HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 02/24/2004 1913 19710 CITY OFATASCA DFRO
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
-TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 2004
7:00 P.M.
Atascadero Lake Pavilion
9315 Pismo St.
Atascadero, California
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M.
CLOSED SESSION:
(Immediately following Redevelopment Agency Meeting)
1. PUBLIC COMMENT - CLOSED SESSION
2. Call to Order
a. Conference with Real Property Negotiators-Govt. Code 54956.8
Property: The Printery, 6361 Olmeda Ave.
Negotiator: City Manager Wade McKinney
Negotiating Parties: Masons
Negotiations will include price and/or terms of payment.
b. Conference With Legal Counsel-Anticipated Litigation. Significant
exposure to litigation pursuant to 54956.9(b) of the government
code: One Case
3. Adjourn
4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
1
REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Pro Tem Scalise
ROLL CALL: Mayor Luna
Mayor Pro Tem Scalise
Council Member Clay
Council Member O'Malley
Council Member Pacas
INTRODUCTIONS:
COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to
address the Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has
jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to five minutes. Please state your name and address
for the record before making your presentation. The Council may take action to direct
the staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. A maximum of 30 minutes
will be allowed for Community Forum, unless changed by the Council.)
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative, Council
Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities.
Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take
action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. The Council may
take action on items listed on the Agenda.)
A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (All items on the consent calendar are considered to
be routine and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion
if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If
comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the
consent calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an
opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the
item before action is taken.)
2
1. December Disbursements — December 2003 Accounts Payable &
Payroll
■ Fiscal impact: $922,728.81.
Staff recommendation: City Council approve certified City accounts
payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for December 2003.
Administrative Services]
]
2. City Treasurer's Report December 2003
■ Fiscal impact: None.
■ City Treasurer recommendation: City Council approve the City
Treasurer's report for December 2003. [City Treasurer]
3. Lewis Avenue Bridge Design
■ Fiscal impact: Approval of these contracts would result in the
expenditure of $198,261.00 in Transportation and Community and
System Preservation (TCSP) funds, and $168,138.80 of the
$400,000.00 from Fund 281, which has been designated for design
and construction of this project.
■ Staff recommendation:
1) Council authorize the City Manager to execute contracts with:
a) Morro Group, Inc., in the amount of $116,984.50 for Lewis
Avenue Bridge Environmental Services, and
b) Psomas in the amount of $188,221.5 for Lewis Avenue
• Bridge Professional Engineering Services.
2) Council authorize the Director of Administrative Services to allocate
$168,138.80 from Fund 281 toward environmental and engineering
services for the Lewis Avenue Bridge Project. (Public Works)
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Tentative Parcel Map 2002-0028 (AT 01-091) and Road Abandonment
20020009 9230 Vista Bonita (APN 030-441-015) (Frederick)
■ Fiscal impact: The project would likely have a slight negative impact
on City revenues. As a general rule, single-family dwellings require
services that exceed the revenue generated by the proposed uses.
■ Staff recommendation:
1. Council adopt draft Resolution A certifying the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration 2003-0066 and approving Tentative Parcel
Map 2002-0028 (AT 01-091), a request to subdivide one parcel
totaling 4.33 acres, gross, into two parcels of 1.87 and 2.46 acres
gross, based on findings and subject to conditions.
2. Council adopt draft Resolution B approving a request to abandon a
portion of Vista Bonita, from its intersection with EI Bordo Avenue to
its westerly terminus. (Community Development)
•
3
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. 2004 Community Development Block Grant Allocation (CDBG)
■ Fiscal impact: Available funds are estimated at $225,655 for the 2004
cycle.
■ Staff recommendation: Council forward to the County Board of
Supervisors allocation recommendations for the 2004 Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. [Management]
2. Masonic Temple/Printery Building Disposition
■ Fiscal impact: If the City retains the building there will be costs
associated with the reconstruction and ongoing maintenance and
operations costs.
Staff Recommendation: Council evaluate the City's options and give
staff direction on Council's preferred course of action.
D. ATTORNEY REPORTS:
1. Emergency Resolution
■ Fiscal impact: Unknown
■ City Attorney recommendation:
Council adopt the draft Resolution continuing in full force and effect the
resolutions declaring the existence of a state of emergency and
directing the City Manager to take direct and immediate acts to repair
(City Attorney)
E. COMMITTEE & LIAISON REPORTS: (The following represent standing
committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary.):
Mayor Luna
1. Finance Committee
2. Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA)
3. County Mayor's Round Table
Mayor Pro Tem Scalise
1. Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Board (appointed by Governor)
2. Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) (City Selection Committee
appointment)
3. S.L.O. Council of Governments (SLOCOG)/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority
(SLORTA)
Council Member Clay
1. Water Committees
4
Council Member O'Malley
1. Finance Committee
2. City/ Schools Committee
3. Air Pollution Control District (APCD)
4. League of California Cities - Grassroots Network
5. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC)
Council Member Pacas
1. City/ Schools Committee
2. Atascadero Youth Task Force
F. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
1. City Council
2. City Clerk
3. City Treasurer
4. City Attorney
5. City Manager
G. ADJOURNMENT:
Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that
• person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. Correspondence submitted at this
public hearing will be distributed to the Council and available for review in the City Clerk's office.
I, Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of
perjury that the foregoing agenda for the February 24, 2004 Regular Session of the Atascadero City
Council was posted on February 17, 2004 at the Atascadero City Hall Annex, 6905 El Camino Real,
Suite 6, Atascadero, CA 93422 and was available for public review in the Customer Service Center
at that location.
Signed this 17th day of February 2004 at Atascadero, California.
, c —
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Perk
City of Atascadero
5
City of Atascadero
WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m., at the
Atascadero Pavilion on the Lake,9315 Pismo St., Atascadero. Matters are considered by the Council in the order of the
printed Agenda.
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file
in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public inspection during City Hall Annex business hours at the Central
Receptionist counter and on our website, www.atascadero.org. An agenda packet is also available for public review at
the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road. Contracts, Resolutions and Ordinances will be allocated a number once they
are approved by the City Council. The minutes of this meeting will reflect these numbers. All documents submitted by the
public during Council meetings that are either read into the record or referred to in their statement will be noted in the
minutes and available for review in the City Clerk's office.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting
or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office or the City Clerk's Office, both at (805)
461-5000. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in
assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS
Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will give their
report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is open and
will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being considered to step up to the podium. If
you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way:
• You must approach the podium and be recognized by the Mayor
• Give your name and address (not required)
• Make your statement •
• All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council
• All comments limited to 5 minutes (unless changed by the Council)
• No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so, and no
one may speak more than twice on any item.
If you wish to use a computer presentation to support your comments, you must notify the City Clerk's office at least 24
hours prior to the meeting. Access to hook up your laptop to the City's projector will be provided. You are required to
submit to the City Clerk a printed copy of your presentation for the record. Please check in with the City Clerk before the
meeting begins to announce your presence and turn in the printed copy.
The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public comments will be
heard by the Council
TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA
Under Agenda item, "COMMUNITY FORUM", the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having business with the
Council to:
• Please approach the podium and be recognized
• Give your name and address (not required)
• State the nature of your business
This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes will be
allowed for Community Forum (unless changed by the Council).
TO HAVE ITEMS PLACED ON AGENDA
All business matters to appear on the Agenda must be in the Office of the City Manager 14 days preceding the Council
meeting. Should you have a matter you wish to bring before the Council, please mail or bring a written communication to
the City Manager's office in City Hall prior to the deadline.
6
ITEM NUMBER: A_I
• DATE02/24/04
Ail
1ee�80
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report - Administrative Services Department
December 2003 Accounts Payable and Payroll
RECOMMENDATION:
Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for
December 2003.
DISCUSSION:
Attached for City Council review and approval are the following:
Payroll
Dated 12/04/03 Checks # 18298 - 18367 $ 77,214.78
Direct Deposits 111,234.47
• Dated 12/12/03 Checks # 18368 - 18385 9,660:72
Direct Deposits 4,538.13
Dated 12/18/03 Checks # 18386 - 18460 90,087.29
Direct Deposits 113,351.91
Accounts Payable
Dated 12/1/03 - 12/31/03 Checks # 92619 - 92835
& EFTs 248 - 251 516,641.51
TOTAL AMOUNT $ 922,728.81
FISCAL IMPACT:
Total expenditures for all funds is $ 922,728.81
CERTIFICATION:
The undersigned certifies that the attached demands have been released for nayment
and that funds are available for these demands.
Rachelle Rickard, Director of Administrative Services
Approved by the City Council at a meeting held February 24, 2004.
ATTACHMENT: Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk
December 2003 Eden Warrant Register in the amount of $ 516,641.51
1
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listini;
For the Month of December 2003
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount.
248 12/3/2003 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 118.20
92633 12/4/2003 TOBIN JAMES WINERY Accounts Payable Check 545.04
92634 12/4/2003 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 67.49
92619 12/5/2003 ATASCADERO FIRE DEPT EMP.ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 240.00
92620 12/5/2003 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 30.00
92621 12/5/2003 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASN Payroll Vendor Payment 399.50
92622 12/5/2003 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 182.69
92623 12/5/2003 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 7,105.47
92624 12/5/2003 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 712.10
92625 12/5/2003 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 8,992.22
92626 12/5/2003 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Payroll Vendor Payment 757.90
92627 12/5/2003 KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS Payroll Vendor Payment 88.00
92628 12/5/2003 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Payroll Vendor Payment 606.99
92629 12/5/2003 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM Payroll Vendor Payment 32.31
92630 12/5/2003 SEIU LOCAL 620 AFL-CIO Payroll Vendor Payment 556.
92631 12/5/2003 SLO CREDIT UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 625
92632 12/5/2003 UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY Payroll Vendor Payment 33.00
249 12/9/2003 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 30,330.06
92635 12/9/2003 PUBLIC EMPL RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 27,073.81
92638 12/11/2003 DEL MCCULLEY Accounts Payable Check 800.00
92636 12/12/2003 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1,271.66
92637 12/12/2003 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 36.05
92639 12/12/2003 ALTIRIS Accounts Payable Check 132.00
92640 12/12/2003 SAGE AMTHOR Accounts Payable Check 50.00
92641 12/12/2003 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 246.78
92642 12/12/2003 ATASCADERO FORD Accounts Payable Check 2,409.02
92644 12/12/2003 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 3,912.70
92645 12/12/2003 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 12.39
92646 12/12/2003 ATASCADERO UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST Accounts Payable Check 175.00
92647 12/12/2003 ANN BANKS Accounts Payable Check 12.00
92648 12/12/2003 JUDITH R.BARON Accounts Payable Check 380.8
92649 12/12/2003 BATTERY SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 1116
92650 12/12/2003 BEST BEST&KRIEGER LLP Accounts Payable Check 495.00
2
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of December 2003
heck Check
mber Date Vendor Description Amount
92651 12/12/2003 SURAYA BREEN Accounts Payable Check 75.00
92652 12/12/2003 BRENDLER JANITORIAL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 635.00
92653 12/12/2003 CAL-COAST REFRIGERATION,INC Accounts Payable Check 591.57
92654 12/12/2003 CALIF CONSERVATION CORPS. Accounts Payable Check 25,232.25
92655 12/12/2003 CDW GOVERNMENT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 196.18
92656 12/12/2003 CELLULAR ONE Accounts Payable Check 1,057.44
92657 12/12/2003 CENTRAL COAST REPTILE RESEARCH Accounts Payable Check 273.00
92658 12/12/2003 CHEM CLEAN Accounts Payable Check 95.40
92659 12/12/2003 CHEM SERVE Accounts Payable Check 104.16
92660 12/12/2003 BRADY CHERRY Accounts Payable Check 300.00
92661 12/12/2003 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 80.00
92662 12/12/2003 CIRCLE D LANDSCAPE Accounts Payable Check 662.09
92663 12/12/2003 CITY NATIONAL BANK Accounts Payable Check 22,683.75
92664 12/12/2003 LAWRENCE CLARK Accounts Payable Check 98.48
92665 12/12/2003 JERRY L.CLAY Accounts Payable Check 75.00
92666 12/12/2003 CLEAN WATER SYSTEMS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 35.00
92667 12/12/2003 COASTAL IMAGING SUPPLIES Accounts Payable Check 658.15
92668 12/12/2003 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT Accounts Payable Check 11.40
92669 12/12/2003 VINCE CONDE Accounts Payable Check 34.00
92670 12/12/2003 CONTINENTAL LABOR RESOURCES Accounts Payable Check 868.00
92671 12/12/2003 CIMON CORMIER Accounts Payable Check 51.00
92672 12/12/2003 CORNERSTONE COMMERCIAL CLEANIN Accounts Payable Check 235.00
92673 12/12/2003 COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Accounts Payable Check 167.00
92674 12/12/2003 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 106.50
92675 12/12/2003 CTE COMPUTER TRAINING CENTERS Accounts Payable Check 500.00
92676 12/12/2003 CTM GROUP,INC. Accounts Payable Check 513.10
92677 12/12/2003 CUESTA EQUIPMENT Accounts Payable Check 279.41
92678 12/12/2003 DATAPRINT CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 67.03
92679 12/12/2003 DAVID M FLEISHMAN Accounts Payable Check 25.00
92680 12/12/2003 DAN DAVIS Accounts Payable Check 119.00
92681 12/12/2003 SANDRA N.DEAL PH.D. Accounts Payable Check 290.00
92682 12/12/2003 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 161.61
92683 12/12/2003 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 480.09
92684 12/12/2003 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Accounts Payable Check 1,669.00
92685 12/12/2003 DIGITAL WEST VIDEO Accounts Payable Check 42.50
92686 12/12/2003 ED'S FLY MEAT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 24.50
3
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of December 2003
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
92687 12/12/2003 EL CAMINO BUILDING SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 46.12
92688 12/12/2003 EL CAMINO CAR WASH LLC Accounts Payable Check 46.95
92689 12/12/2003 ESCUELA DEL RIO Accounts Payable Check 64.80
92690 12/12/2003 FAMILY MEDICAL GROUP OF PASO Accounts Payable Check 50.00
92691 12/12/2003 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 102.88
92692 12/12/2003 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 397.92
92693 12/1212003 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL Accounts Payable Check 643.50
92694 12/12/2003 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 837.46
92695 12/12/2003 WARREN FRACE Accounts Payable Check 300.00
92696 12/12/2003 FRAZEE INDUSTRIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 39.15
92697 12/12/2003 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 272.86
92698 12/12/2003 GATEWAY COMPANIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 4,635.36
92699 12/12/2003 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 546.25
92700 12/12/2003 GIBBS SECURITY GATES Accounts Payable Check 123.50
92701 12/12/2003 MIKE GIL Accounts Payable Check 68.00
92702 12/12/2003 GLADWELL GOVERNMENT SVCS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,640.00
92703 12/12/2003 KENNETH GLYNN Accounts Payable Check 15
92704 12/12/2003 CECILIA GOTTFRIED Accounts Payable Check 275.x"
92705 12/12/2003 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 0.75
92706 12/12/2003 H.D.PETERSON Accounts Payable Check 255.00
92707 12/12/2003 ANN HALL Accounts Payable Check 2,554.68
92708 12/12/2003 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 1,231.76
92709 12/12/2003 VALERIE HUMPHREY Accounts Payable Check 107.68
92710 12/12/2003 ICE TEES Accounts Payable Check 648.86
92711 12/12/2003 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Accounts Payable Check 503.77
92712 12/12/2003 J&S SWEEPING SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 400.00
92713 12/12/2003 JB DEWAR INC Accounts Payable Check 122.66
92714 12/12/2003 JESPERSEN'S TIRE SERVICE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 30.00
92715 12/12/2003 JIFFY LUBE#1932 PCJL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 126.47
92716 12/12/2003 JOHN L.WALLACE&ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 990.01
92717 12/12/2003 STEVEN KAHN Accounts Payable Check 335.83
92718 12/12/2003 LESLYN KEITH Accounts Payable Check 21.00
92719 12/12/2003 KEN'S MOBIL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 1,546.63
92720 12/12/2003 DAREN KENNETT Accounts Payable Check 39.13
92721 12/12/2003 KERSEY'S ATASCADERO QUICK LUBE Accounts Payable Check 50
4
City of Ataseadero
Disbursement Listing;
For the Month of December 2003
heck Check
umber Date Vendor Description Amount
92722 12/12/2003 KIM LACEY Accounts Payable Check 17.32
92723 12/12/2003 LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 15,951.59
92724 12/12/2003 LEHR AUTO ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 213.05
92725 12/12/2003 LEXIS NEXIS MATTHEW BENDER Accounts Payable Check 71.65
92726 12/12/2003 LOST COAST DETAILING Accounts Payable Check 180.00
92727 12/12/2003 GEORGE W.LUNA Accounts Payable Check 75.00
92728 12/12/2003 LYNDON'S AUTOMOTIVE Accounts Payable Check 35.00
92729 12/12/2003 LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 187.85
92731 12/12/2003 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK,INC. Accounts Payable Check 361.26
92732 12/12/2003 ANNETTE MANIER Accounts Payable Check 13.14
92733 12/12/2003 MARK'S PLUMBING&WATER TRMNT Accounts Payable Check 550.00.
92734 12/12/2003 ROBERT MAXWELL Accounts Payable Check 414.46
92735 12/12/2003 MCALLISTER OFFICE PAVILION Accounts Payable Check 114.71
92736 12/12/2003 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 500.00
92737 12/12/2003 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. Accounts Payable Check 228.25
92738 12/12/2003 MICHAEL'S WINDOW CLEANING Accounts Payable Check 20.00
• 92739 12/12/2003 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW Accounts Payable Check 2,312.31
92740 12/12/2003 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 70.34
92741 12/12/2003 MOBILITAT Accounts Payable Check 3,000.00
92742 12/12/2003 MORENO STRIPING SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 26,844.18
92743 12/12/2003 MICHAL S.MOSES Accounts Payable Check 927.78
92744 12/12/2003 MOSS,LEVY,&HARTZHEIM Accounts Payable Check 5,000.00
92745 12/12/2003 NEW TIMES Accounts Payable Check 408.00.
92746 12/12/2003 NEWCO DISTRIBUTORS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 104.46
92747 12/12/2003 NEWTON'S SLO SPEEDOMETER Accounts Payable Check 232.18
92748 12/12/2003 NORTH COUNTY BACKFLOW SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 300.00
92749 12/12/2003 THOMAS P.O'MALLEY Accounts Payable Check 75.00
92750 12/12/2003 OFFICE DEPOT INC. Accounts Payable Check 273.63
92751 12/12/2003 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN Accounts Payable Check 96.40
92752 12/12/2003 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 334.77
92753 12/12/2003 BECKY J.PACAS Accounts Payable Check 75.00
92755 12/12/2003 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 35,339.17
92756 12/12/2003 PASO ROBLES SAFE&LOCK Accounts Payable Check 182.22
92757 12/12/2003 PERRY'S PARCEL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 179.59
• 92758 12/12/2003 POSTAL PRIVILEGE Accounts Payable Check 37.83
92759 12/12/2003 PRO MOTION Accounts Payable Check 236.93
5
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of December 2003
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amoun!J0
92760 12/12/2003 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 289.72
92761 12/12/2003 GRACE L.PUCCI Accounts Payable Check 277.50
92762 12/12/2003 QUILL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 359.89
92763 12/12/2003 RADIO SHACK CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 126.46
92764 12/12/2003 RAINBOW MEALWORMS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 202.54
92765 12/12/2003 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 537.43
92766 12/12/2003 RED'S PLUMBING Accounts Payable Check 81.75
92767 12/12/2003 REID ROOFING Accounts Payable Check 22,380.00
92768 12/12/2003 RICK BUTLER BUSINESS MACHINES Accounts Payable Check 300.00
92769 12/12/2003 RACHELLE RICKARD Accounts Payable Check 351.59
92770 12/12/2003 STEVE ROMO Accounts Payable Check 51.00
92771 12/12/2003 RXLASER Accounts Payable Check 334.58
92772 12/12/2003 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SHERIFF Accounts Payable Check 8,140.00
92773 12/12/2003 SAN LUIS PAINTS Accounts Payable Check 249.70
92774 12/12/2003 SAN LUIS PERSONNEL INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,941.10
92775 12/12/2003 STEVE SANDEFFER Accounts Payable Check 158.59
92776 12/12/2003 SANTA MARIA TIRE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,24#
92777 12/12/2003 SBC Accounts Payable Check 5,275.
92778 12/12/2003 SBC Accounts Payable Check 138.47
92779 12/12/2003 SBC/MCI Accounts Payable Check 277.77
92780 12/12/2003 WENDY SCALISE Accounts Payable Check 75.00
92781 12/12/2003 LISETTE SCHOLL Accounts Payable Check 138.60
92782 12/12/2003 JOHN SIEMENS Accounts Payable Check 42.79
92783 12/12/2003 SIGN OUTLET Accounts Payable Check 32.18
92784 12/12/2003 SLOCOMOTION Accounts Payable Check 19.84
92785 12/12/2003 SMART AND FINAL Accounts Payable Check 153.82
92786 12/12/2003 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1,244.40
92787 12/12/2003 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIERS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 633.75
92788 12/12/2003 SYLVESTER'S SECURITY ALARMS Accounts Payable Check 500.00
92789 12/12/2003 T-N-T PEST CONTROL Accounts Payable Check 88.00
92790 12/12/2003 TECHDEPOT Accounts Payable Check 28.32
92791 12/12/2003 TEE'S PLUS Accounts Payable Check 215.27
92792 12/12/2003 TEMPLETON FEED&GRAIN Accounts Payable Check 136.39
92793 12/12/2003 TERRY&PAULSON ENTERPRISE INC Accounts Payable Check 18.00
92794 12/12/2003 TESORO CAR WASH Accounts Payable Check 7-0
6
City of Ataseadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of December 2003
Check Check
mber Date Vendor Description Amount
92795 12/12/2003 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR Accounts Payable Check 668.55
92796 12/12/2003 ULTREX BUSINESS PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 357.17
92797 12/12/2003 USDA RURAL DEVELOPMENT Accounts Payable Check 110.57
92798 12/12/2003 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check 465.39
92799 12/12/2003 JEFF VAN DEN EIKHOF Accounts Payable Check 214.20
92800 12/12/2003 TOM VELASQUEZ Accounts Payable Check 68.00
92801 12/12/2003 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 241.92
92802 12/12/2003 VIDEO PALACE Accounts Payable Check 14.60
92803 12/12/2003 VINTAGE CATERING&CAFE Accounts Payable Check 2,669.40
92804 12/12/2003 NANCY E.WEBBER,PH.D. Accounts Payable Check 290.00
92805 12/12/2003 WILLIAM AVERY&ASSC.,INC. Accounts Payable Check 11,971.26
92806 12/12/2003 WULFING'S POLYGRAPH SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 450.00
250 12/15/2003 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 4,450.34
92807 12/18/2003 RENE VASQUEZ Accounts Payable Check 352.87
92823 12/18/2003 BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA Payroll Vendor Payment 71,034.16
• 92808 12/19/2003 ATASCADERO FIRE DEPT EMP.ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 240.00
92809 12/19/2003 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 30.00
92810 12/19/2003 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASN Payroll Vendor Payment 399.50
92811 12/19/2003 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 182.69
92812 12/19/2003 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 8,285.07
92813 12/19/2003 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 708.35
92814 12/19/2003 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 7,419.15
92815 12/19/2003 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Payroll Vendor Payment 757.90
92816 12/19/2003 KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS Payroll Vendor Payment 88.00
92817 12/19/2003 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Payroll Vendor Payment 611.75
92818 12/19/2003 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM Payroll Vendor Payment 38.04
92819 12/19/2003 PUBLIC EMPL RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 28,153.73
92820 12/19/2003 SEIU LOCAL 620 AFL-CIO Payroll Vendor Payment 596.51
92821 12/19/2003 SLO CREDIT UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 625.00
92822 12/19/2003 UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY Payroll Vendor Payment 33.00
92824 12/22/2003 CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY CHURCH Accounts Payable Check 8,775.00
251 12/23/2003 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 34,414.70
92825 12/30/2003 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA
Payroll Vendor Payment 1,618.36
7
City of Ataseadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of December 2003
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
92826 12/30/2003 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO Payroll Vendor Payment 793.63
92827 12/30/2003 COLONIAL LIFE&ACCIDENT INS. Payroll Vendor Payment 1,586.65
92828 12/30/2003 DELTA DENTAL,ATTN:ACCOUNTING Payroll Vendor Payment 7,661.12
92829 12/30/2003 EQUITABLE LIFE Payroll Vendor Payment 697.76
92830 12/31/2003 HOME DEPOT Accounts Payable Check 1,532.12
92833 12/31/2003 I.M.P.A.C.GOVERNMENT SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 10,148.78
92834 12/31/2003 FINANCE DEPARTMENT PETTY CASH Accounts Payable Check 396.06
92835 12/31/2003 DENISE ANGEL ROBINSON Accounts Payable Check 150.00
$ 516,641.51
r
ITEM NUMBER: A-2
DATE: 022404
taxa 1979
Atascadero City Council December 2003
Staff Report - City Treasurer
December 2003 Investment Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Council approve the City Treasurer's report for December 2003.
REPORT IN BRIEF:
Cash and Investments
Checking $ 408,004
Money Market Accounts 341
Certificates of Deposit 5,363,134
Government Securities 1;742,500
LAIF 16,331,454
Cash with Fiscal Agents 143,673
Cash in Banks at December 31, 2003 $ 23,989,106
Deposits in Transit -
Outstanding Checks (117,916)
Cash and Investments at December 31, 2003 $ 23,871,190
Investment Activity
Securities Purchased:
None
Securities Matured:
None
Securities Sold/Called Prior to Maturity:
None
Other Reportable Activities:
None
Page 1 of 11
9
CITY OF ATASCADERO
TREASURER'S REPORT
CASH& INVESTMENTS ACTIVITY SUMMARY
FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER 2003
CHECKING FISCAL
ACCOUNT INVESTMENTS AGENT TOTALS
Balance per Banks at
December 1, 2003 $ 295,105 $ 21,767,060 $ 143,612 $ 22,205,777
Receipts 2,740,733 369 61 2,741,163
Disbursements (957,834) -
Transfers In - 1,670,000 - 1,670,000
Transfers Out (1,670,000) - - (1,670,000)
Balance per Banks at
December 31, 2003 $ 408,004 $ 23,437,429 $ 143,673 23,989,106
Deposits in Transit -
Outstanding Checks (117,916)
Adjusted Treasurer's Balance $ 23,871,190
10 Page 2 of 11
q h b V N w O O M
000 N N V O
O �n N N N N m N
V N
W \
V �
• O r- V N w O. O M - 'n O �o :r -N
[� V O1 T
W
wIo 00 '.00 1O
'J OD r h Vi r r Qo N r C, C, b w
".00 a, 00
69
�o O O O O O M oo O O O O O - O M
N h V Vi O O O O Cl O N O O O O :O O �D
V M Vi O O O O O O r- O O O O O O O
10 h � vi vi 'lam
m D\ D\ (1 C\ U 'V' of .ol O+ C\ C+ Cl of P
10
4
69
a C �d cid cq F N cd N �d cd ctl td l�
G v C K 1L' C �L v ❑ Z �.,�L �L v
U
ti
y q
a �O -O 0 O O Cl M O O O 0 .. O C) O O
7 O O O. - O O O O
Obi -� a,
7 a ( T C \. ol - r- In:C \ C\ ' rl-
_.O,
69
q e e o 0 o
v e o o a
C W v v v a t(om ClC,Iq w� o o N
-tt a a
'�CWN
U �WME,
o v o 0 0 0 0 0
Iq IP 1� v o 0 0
v
U 4 W V
Y
u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
W d w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o o o o
W [�. o o u 4)
> w s s a ro a ro Cs v ro a s ro
V c z tr
U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U
o 0 0 0 N 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
q M h 00 M N N M �o .-.. _ N
O O O' O O O O O O O Cl
4
94
O
F
F�'r �i •S i Y y •� O � 0.1 Y Y C
rt C R
Oa Q
Q Y `o 0 U zp a Y
.^°. O ry w CG u o y L .� O a' U0 G W .c fl '= Z p
EV x C Y o Z M a C Y 0 c �° u ,'`j ra o d 0. C $ d
a .a C1 W W O W A 7 n C7 F0 Q U G1 v� d W U
m
0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
F o o m o r o 0 o r v o N C, v
q ^ N N N N M M h o rn
O O O O O O O O O O O O ^ O
GL
N O N 7 V V'1 V1 00 •-• Vl O M O\ v1
,D M 7 O N M r N til �n 10 N
V ` N N N NN N N N
V �
O vl r 10 a, w O OMCl -It w _ Vl T N N r O O - •
M r N M Iq N
D\ D1 a,of
� O �
69
O, O O O O O O O O O - O ..O O O : O O
h Cl O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
0o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O tl v v r" C7, r" r a v of o, o,
cz
rn o, o, o, rn o, rn a Cla a o, a, o, o, a
ti h
O j
ti
ro o06
ro
� O
4 ~
A �
0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O o O
0 0 0 0 o O o o O o O Cl Cl Cl O Cl
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
V o rn a rn ar, Cl C, a rn C7, rn ol rn rn ol rn
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
V oo o v v v, o 0 o n o o ,n
O h W h N N � r N N N M 00 O O 00 O '. O ID
W O O 00 'd' M M M M M V M MM
Q d O v1 V'1 O vl O
h W Oh N N r r N N N M W O O o0 O O a
N M �
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 .o o c o 0 0 0 o c
W
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A
W w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
d a 0 0 0 0 0
vj d a�
a� a�a� a� m a� a� �; a) id 0 0
•w- w^ w w w- w w w w w- w^ w w w e,- w
U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U
h O N N N N N N N N N N N M N
O O O O O O O
O O O O Cl O O O O O
L
10,
y L
h Y Y Y y Y
Ud d Y W A c u F o Z
°/dd o � U is cd ° z
W _`�, c .° Y M, w >G
m o o Aa E = A > °g ,o 1 Z coo � � aiv •
e 7 F d .E o •� h eLn e b Y u 3 a C1 a °n
c i e
tiw U Z a. a] a. r AC7 � AA C7 C7 arU cqa O .a A Uw U .a
r 7 O V V 00 ,a
O N N -• M M O O N N N O
Q
N i+1 O Cl O O .. --� O O O O O '.
12
Wh00 C', o D o n v o v n n r v
ti ^. f v v v o r oo. r o
N N 0 o0 ,O rn �° rn N b r r �- 00 V
U c 00 O, lD O ^� - h OM. Vl 7
00 M N O, M Vl o, r ,O
�• N
00 "C r" '4 r- ,D
N M
d9
C> O O o O O O O O O O Cl O O o' O O
O O O O o o O O O O O O O o C. '.O O
O o O O o O O O O O O O O O O: O o
0 W v v n a ro v r' o; o; r` r" r" °, o 0
c,o, o, o C', o C7, o 0 0, a, o 0 0 0,. o O
Ir Fr M M
O j
o
ti
4 A
Oo 0 0 o O o O O O O Cl 0 0 0 0 0
C> O o Cl O O o O O O O o Cl 0 0 0 Cl
o O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 C
U a or, a C,, C, C, a C,, a or, m C, a, ol C, C, o 0
M M
p e o 0 0 0 0 o e e o 0 0 0 0
0 0 o v5 v o 0 0. o 0
ti 0 0 0 0 0, v, r o 00 00 .- v, I
W O MO p M v v v v v v v r 7 r m M ri m
y N eC n n o v o o O o o O n n O Cl o
a o o O o 0 0 0, 1� r 0 00 00 v
r' y I M R 'Ir 7 7 7 M M M V M M M- N M
v � W �
j
[r o 0 0
a
N a 0. C. 0. aa aa
N 0 'Co
4) u
W A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A
W w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
W u u u u Q u li u u E E
v v o v v v v v v v v
w w w w w w w w w^ w ,w^ w w w- w i
N 0 o o ° N o 0 0 0
U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U:
4,4
Q'
M
p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c
4 I
b
0
u Y L ? G G U
rA
IV
Y
0. ►� o e Q W = Y = o rz
U v ea A
op edea °a oC�7
p° U cw cc
a s o
z °' en — c ° „ = z c U a o c i. g n U o x
40
v U z F x oa U o ti z U w 3 w v U e H v U x u v w U w U
w
r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r ao
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o o v o
O N N M O O N M
M DD W a0 0p
p 0 O O Cl O O O Cl O O - -- p
13
10 ' O, V r-
P4 C-1
N 0
000
O O M. O N O ,O ,O O V V 7 Vl
O\ O M N N O M v'1 Q, 00
W t` n b DD h •..• h M M Vl ,D O N O� dr h
l- Oi 00 O ,O ,O O 0i ,D -r- Cl
N O, (71 N M O, C N T P N O, O Q1 O, N
~ N
6'9
O O O O O Q\ O O O O O O C, O O Q\
O O O O O ,D O O O O O Cl O O N
O O O O
O 6v m 00 w O h N h O Oi O+ O D1 Do OQ h h
T O, a\ h -It O\ O, 'n O, T 'O C, Q, CT Q\ M
N M N N 7 _
C W a"
V � �
H N O R c0 \cC �: p c0 t0 ctl \w id ca O O
C q
0 0 o O O o O Cl 0 o O O o O o rn
O o 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 o a
0 0 o O O o 0 0 o O o o O o o
W rn rn ol v a o a C, o rn a a rn �
N
LLi , N
69
q e o e o o e e e e e o o e o Q
N O O O O. O O N V1 'A O O O 09 O O
O O T .-� N N M 'n 00 W V'1 O V
W O M M M M N N N M aV M M M mV M M
Q w N
ti
Cl O O O O N v1 vl O O O V1 O -O
�Cl! M 'Il 00 [, h '.O
M M M N N N M N M m m M V' M M W
V [
N cV ctl � � cd � cd at � td cd R cd C
hIQ
ti
..
F a a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0
a) d d v v v a4i aai v aai a�'i aai ani
W A A A q q q q q q q
W w w w w w w w w w w
O O O O C C O O O O O - O
lu N N a) N a) N m 0
�y m ro 6 6 as
r > > > > >
U U U C7 C7 U C7 C7 U U C7 U U U U
101,
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
(� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
7 ,o DO O O v1 N O 'n 00 r-
O Z-)q . Q O O N�o 0 0 ,o r- a a r- o0 00 0o a o o
Cl o 0 o O o o O o o O O
0.
l 00 l a 11 It
-
0. � cq ca a c `y oC�7 x 10, Y
wd � d
V ti c Y aro d o as o` u rn d F. ar X Pa . „ Ucc
W ` � � o � a 0 cM °a � o : EM Ci YQ ° � db ? c
G b c x # x # o xu tm x # d I e°ny
is bo
cl
Cd 0
V) Cd K x ar d G
d v o d � d o a� aq d a abi 7 '� U 3
wu wU Q wU wv H ¢ 3 � wU .9 �
W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
F
It ,o a O Cl cn o0 OV1 00 [� h O N ,o
O O M :z N N M O O !Z4
,o ,O �D \O fl- W[� f� h m m a O O
Q O O O O O O O O Cl O O O --
14
NO �
• h r- v
en
N e
en
.-+ N
69 69
h� h r- O
V�
0 w N
d O N
j N- H -
'^ y
AGM
o
u
a� o 0
en
N
�L
69 (A w
O
obi ; O
O
O h�
W
Awry ii 3 `y
U M q W w
d
h �
oma „
g cCd
ti
cn
wv '
� ¢ o
o y
� bo
w b w
0
ti b ° v o
o E .� b
U
N ti
� e O
w 16 > s
-14
tis ' caw N
d to
h �
15
City of Atascadero
Investments by Type
December 2003
Gov't Cash with
Securities Fiscal
Certificates of Deposit 7% Agent
1% Other
23% 0%
-------------
LA1F
69%
Investment December 2003
LAIF $ 16,331,454
Certificates of Deposit 5,363,134
Government Securities 1,742,500
Cash with Fiscal Agent 143,673
Other 341
$ 23,581,102
Page 8 of 11
16
City of Atascadero
Investments by Maturity
• December 2003
One Month
to One Year One to Five Years
Within 5% 25%
One Month
1% < .;
{
`e°fit r`
•
On Demand
69%
Investment December 2003
On Demand $ 16,331,795
Within One Month 191,556
One Month to One Year 1,107,731
One to Five Years 5,806,346
$ 23,437,429
Page 9 of 11
17
City of Atascadero
Investments by Custodial Agent
December 2003
•
RBC Dain Rauscher Bank of
21% New York City of
Penson Financial Corp. 1% Atascadero
9% 0%
State of California •
69%
Custodial Agent December 2003
State of California $ 16,331,454
Penson Financial Corp. 2,112,625
RBC Dain Rauscher 4,945,347
Bank of New York 143,673
City of Atascadero 48,003
$ 23,581,102
•
Page 10 of 11
18
City of Atascadero
Investment Yield vs. 2-Year Treasury Yield .
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003
•
3.50%
3.00%
, ar
2.50% : +
2.00% �°
1.50% tj
1.00%
0.50%
0.00%
61SP Ori O� On' 5PrL0 rp T, rL0 rL0 �O �O ry0 T, 1P rl0 rp T
Qee` e`
e` o�Fie`
O � � O
City Yield 2-Yr Treasury Yield
2-Yr
Treasury
City Yield Yield
December 2002 2.89% 1.84%
January 2003 2.81% 1.74%
February 2003 2.64% 1.63%
March 2003 2.57%
April 2003 2.46% 1.62%
May 2003 2.36% 1.42%
June 2003 2.28% 1.23%
July 2003 2.22% 1.47%
August 2003 2.23% 1.86%
September 2003 2.23% 1.71%
October 2003 2.21% 1.75%
November 2003 2.18% 1.93%
December 2003 2.11% 1.91%
•
Page 11 of 11
19
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
DATE: 02/24/04
•
i9is is e
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report- Public Works Department
Lewis Avenue Bridge Consultant Agreements for
Environmental Services and Professional Engineering Services
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Council authorize the City Manager to execute contracts with:
• a) Morro Group, Inc. in the amount of $116,984.50 for Lewis Avenue Bridge
Environmental Services, and
b) Psomas in the amount of $188,221.5 for Lewis Avenue Bridge Professional
Engineering Services
2. Council authorize the Director of Administrative Services to allocate $168,138.80
from Fund 281 toward environmental and engineering services for the Lewis
Avenue Bridge Project.
DISCUSSION:
Background: Lewis Avenue is an east-west collector road that runs parallel to EI
Camino Real. West of the existing discontinuity at Atascadero Creek, Lewis Avenue
services City Hall, Atascadero Junior High School, and Downtown as well as providing
an important east-west collector link to Traffic Way. East of Atascadero Creek, Lewis
Avenue connects to Santa Ysabel Avenue to create a collector route to Curbaril
Avenue. A bridge on Lewis Avenue, over Atascadero Creek, will connect this east-west
collector system. The Bridge has been identified as an important circulation element in
the original Atascadero Colony Plan, the Atascadero Downtown Revitalization Plan
(July 2000) and the Circulation Element (July 2002).
20
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
DATE: 02/24/04
A Project Study Report dated August 31, 2001 was produced by Bengal Engineering for
the proposed bridge on. Lewis Avenue. The study addressed design alternatives,
environmental concerns and funding.
This project is federally financed by the Transportation, Community and System
Preservation (TCSP) Program and is subject to all requirements of that grant. The City
established a 4% Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goal for this project.
Analysis: On October 31, 2003, Requests for Proposals (RFP) for both Environmental
Services and Professional Engineering Services were published in the Telegram
g g
Tribune.
In accordance with Caltrans' Consultant Selection Guidebook, the "One-Step RFP"
method was used. Generally, procedures are as follows:
1. Advertise for Proposals.
2. Receive Proposals and review for responsiveness.
3. Consultant Selection Committeep erforms reference checks, confirms DBE
requirements are met, and evaluates and ranks each proposal.
4. Top-ranked consultant is asked to submit a Cost Proposal.
5. City compares consultant's Cost Proposal with the Engineer's Estimate and
negotiates the contract.
Five proposals for Environmental Services and four for Professional Engineering
Services were received on November 18, 2003 as follows: •
Engineering Services:
Bengal Engineering, Goleta
John L. Wallace and Associates, San Luis Obispo
Psomas, Sacramento
URS, Santa Barbara
Environmental Services:
Morro Group, San Luis Obispo
Padre Associates, San Luis Obispo
Piedra Environmental Consultants, San Luis Obispo
Rincon Associates, San Luis Obispo
URS, Santa Barbara
They were reviewed and ranked by the Consultant Selection Committee on December
4, 2003. Morro Group, Inc. was found to be the most qualified Environmental firm and
Psomas the most qualified Professional Engineering firm. Cost Proposals were
received and staff negotiated contracts with each firm.
Conclusion: Staff recommends that the City Council award contracts to Morro Group,
Inc. for Lewis Avenue Bridge Environmental Services, and to Psomas for Lewis Avenue •
Bridge Professional Engineering Services.
21
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
DATE: 02/24/04
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of these contracts would result in the expenditure of $198,261.00 in
Transportation and Community and System Preservation (TCSP) funds, and
$168,138.80 of the $400,000.00 from Fund 281, which has been designated for design
and construction of this project.
EXPENDITURES
Environmental Services Contract $116,984.50
Professional Engineering Services Contract $188,221.50
Contingency— 10% $30,596.90
Staff Coordination — 10% $30,596.90
Total Estimated Expenditure: $366,399.80
REVENUES
Transportation and Community and System $198,261.00
Preservation TCSP Funding
Fund 281 for Design and Construction $400,000.00
Total Revenues: $598,261.00
Construction funding for this project has not been totally allocated. $230,000.00 is
remaining in Fund 281 for construction. These funds are proposed to be used for a
match to leverage state or federal funding for construction. Staff will continue to look for
funding sources. The goal is to construct this project in the summer of 2006 or 2007.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Do not award the contract. Direct staff to request additional proposals.
•
22
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
ilia ■ ie e
A tascadero City Council
Staff Report - Community Development Department
Tentative Parcel Map 2002-0028 (AT 01-091) and
Road Abandonment 2002-0009
9230 Vista Bonita (APN 030-441-015)
(Frederick)
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The Planning Commission recommends:
1. Council adopt draft Resolution A certifying the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration 2003-0066 and approving Tentative Parcel Map 2002-0028 (AT 01-
091), a request to subdivide one parcel totaling 4.33 acres, gross, into two
parcels of 1.87 and 2.46 acres gross, based on findings and subject to
conditions.
2. Council adopt draft Resolution B approving a request to abandon a portion of
Vista Bonita, from its intersection with EI Bordo Avenue to its westerly terminus.
REPORT-IN-BRIEF:
The project consists of a request to subdivide one 4.33 acre lot into two lots of 1.87 and
2.46 acres, gross and abandon Vista Bonita Road. The site is located on the south
side of Vista Bonita, west of EI Bordo Avenue. The property is steep, with average
slopes over 30%. Although proposed Parcel 1 was not intended for residential
development, building envelopes for both proposed parcels have been identified on
slopes under 20%.
Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission heard this project at a public
hearing on December 16, 2003. The Commission recommended approval of the
project with changes to the conditions of approval. Specifically, the Commission
recommended (1) changes to Planning Condition 8 to allow for the use of septic
systems on the lots and (2) that Parcel 1 be permitted as a residential building lot, with
all future grading to be restricted to the proposed footprint area.
23
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
At the time of the environmental analysis, Staff evaluated the project as a cellular •
facility on lot 1 and a residential building site on lot 2. The proposal to allow residential
development on lot 1 was first brought up during the Planning Commission hearing.
Staff recommended the Commission refer this item back for additional staff and
environmental analysis of residential development on lot 1. Staff's concern was that
proper fire access to tot 1 does not exist and that development of lot 1 may require
substantial grading that could create significant visual impacts.
The mitigated negative declaration contains a mitigation measure (Mitigation Measure
9.b.1) that requires an open space easement over proposed Parcel 1. This mitigation
measure is in conflict with the Planning Commission's recommendation. In addition,
staff has not evaluated the potential impacts of additional grading on proposed Parcel
1, septic systems, or emergency response impacts for an additional residential parcel
on an access road that will exceed 20% slope.
Although the Planning Commission is recommending approval of the project, staff has
withdrawn its recommendation of approval,that was originally forwarded to the Planning
Commission.
SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Applicant/Owner: Michael Frederick, P.O. Box 573, Atascadero, •
California 93423; (805) 466-5060
2. Representative: Wilson Land Surveys, 7600 Morro Road, Atascadero,
California 93422; (805) 466-2445
3. Project Address: 9230 Vista Bonita, Atascadero, California 93422
APN 030-441-015
4. General Plan Designation: SFR-Z (Single Family Residential, 1.5 to 2.5 acre
minimum)
5. Zoning District: SFR-Z (Residential Single Family, 1.5 to 2.5 acre
minimum)
6. Site Area: 4.33 acres, gross
7. Existing Use: Cell Site/Vacant
8. Environmental Status: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration.
24
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
DISCUSSION:
•
Background. The site is located t on the south side of Vista Bonita, west of EI Bordo
Avenue. The surrounding parcels are generally developed with single-family
residences on lots of 1 acre or greater.
I p
Chalk Mountain Golf Course
r
EI Camino Real
Highway 101
Vista Bonita Avenue
r ��I
Project Site
EI Bordo Avenue
There are existing cellular sites within the area of proposed Parcel 1. Planning
Commission Resolution 2001-038 approved the cellular sites in August of 2001.
Proposed Parcel 2 has previously been graded and has an existing building pad area.
25
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
z
Cellular
Towers Building Area
Parcel 1
Parcel 2
Analysis: Minimum lot size for Residential Single Family-Z parcels is based on
performance standards and ranges between 1.5 and 2.5 acres, gross. Minimum lot
size for the parcels in question were calculated as follows:
•
26
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
IZ n
Nlinimum,�t.Size=Grteria.For the Residential Sin le°Fame o e
Lot Size Factors
Distance from
Center of 0-4,000=.08;4-6,000=.10;
Community 6-8,000=.12 >8,000 0.12
>20 min/inch=.30;20-59
Septic Suitability min/inch=.50; >60 min/inch=
(perk rate) .70 Sewer 0.3
0-20%=.3, 21-30%=.50,
Average Sloe 31%and over=.70 0.7
City accepted road=.15
Paved road less than 15%=.15;
Paved road more than 15%=20;
All weather less than 15%=.25;
All weather more than 15%=.30;
Access Condition Unimproved surface=.40 0.2
Average Lot Size
Within 1500 Feet
(acres) 1.021 0.20
Minimum
Lot Size= 1.523
• M iumum<<Lot Size=Ci iteria:For the.Resid6ntialx,Sin le Family zone
. Lot Size Factors
Distance from �
Center of 0-4,000=.08, 4-6,000=.10
Community 6-8,000=.12 >8,000 0.12
>20 min/inch=.30
Septic Suitability 20-59 min/inch=.50
(perk rate) >60 min/inch= .70 Sewer 0.3
0-20%=.3, 21-30%= .50,
Average Sloe 31%and over=.70 0.7
City accepted road=.15
Paved road less than 15%=.15
Paved road more than 15%=20
All weather less than 15%= .25
All weather more than 15%=.30
Access Condition Unimproved surface= .40 0.2
Average Lot Size
Within 1500 Feet
(acres) 1.02 0.2
Minimum
Lot Size= 1.523
27
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
The proposed lot sizes meet the minimum lot size requirement for parcels using City
sewer facilities. General Plan Policy 5.2.5 does not permit the creation of new lots •
when average slopes are 30% or greater, unless a building envelope with slopes of
20% or less can be established. Both lots have building areas with slopes of 20% or
less. In addition, staff recommended a condition of approval for the subdivision
requiring an open space easement over all of Parcel 1, which is currently used as a
cellular facility site. This condition was removed by the Planning Commission.
The lots will take access off of Vista Bonita Avenue as a private driveway. The
applicant is requesting abandonment of Vista Bonita with this application. City Council
Resolution 24-97 previously abandoned the most westerly portion of Vista Bonita in
May of 1997. If approved, this abandonment request would relinquish the remaining
portion of Vista Bonita Avenue.
L.,
L01 C;
N
�Z m
� Z— O
a � ��?'`� �wocna_
Jew a ZZw3Z
own 0 0
LLIaaa �O ZQaUQ�' N
WOa8LL a
V)MLL
o a0 o W(aF pa U
SOB n EL 0 En 10
Q�a o •
Requested Abandonment
sw
N m N
Q oa wm J
�•- FO Um
as Q¢ 0
dQ JWWP
n
_m o Q a<
= J
W C N n
N
r W'd
N
¢
Ji nr
urn ¢
4J
Previously Abandoned
_M CC Resolution 24-97
JI
N
N O
0
Q y!
nQaF i
5¢
� OJ N O v
O
2z0 Z X3
600Vf= 9
U J o Cpq
iV
N D W�pOF
MI M C n e
r
28
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
The Public Works Department and the Fire Department have both reviewed the
abandonment request and determined that, due to the steepness of Vista Bonita
Avenue, the road will not meet City standards and therefore, abandonment is
appropriate at this time. The Fire Department has not evaluated the project in light of
the additional residential unit proposed on lot 1.
'Environmental Review: The Initial Study concludes that there will be no significant
harm to the environment as a result of this subdivision. A proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration has been prepared for the project. Staff is concerned about the adequacy
of the environmental review since the Commission changed the project description to
allow residential development on Lot 1.
Public Improvements: The City Engineer's office is not requesting public improvements
at this time.
1
5i
I+�I yhl '• � y I �!
1„
1
t
\ 5i
q
§
,1
II �
Proposed Tentative Parcel Map for TPM 2002-0028
•
29
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
Conclusion:
The original subdivision project was consistent with the General Plan and Zoning •
Ordinance. The parcel configurations are consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance
requirements and the size and shape of the proposed lots are consistent with the
character of the immediate neighborhood.
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the tentative
parcel map and road abandonment with changes to Planning Condition No. 8 to allow
the use of septic systems and to allow proposed Parcel 1 to be developed in the future
with a residential unit. Absent a building footprint and grading plan for lot 1 staff has not
been able to analyze if the project meets all applicable City standards and the
requirements of CEQA.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City revenues. As a general
rule, single-family dwellings require services that exceed the revenue generated by the
proposed uses.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. The City Council may continue the hearing and refer the item back to staff and/or
the Planning Commission for additional information or analysis. Direction should be
given to staff and the applicant on required information.
2. The City Council may approve the subdivision subject to additional or revised project
conditions. The Council's motion to approve needs to include any new or revised
project conditions.
3. The City Council may deny the subdivision if it is found to be inconsistent with the
General Plan or any of the other required findings. The Council's recommendation
to deny must include a finding basis for denial.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1 Draft Resolution A
Attachment 2 Draft Resolution B
•
30
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
ATTACHMENT 1: Draft Resolution A
• TTM 2002-0028
9230 Vista Bonita Avenue
DRAFT RESOLUTION A
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2002-0028 TO
DIVIDE ONE RESIDENTIAL LOT INTO TWO RESIDENTIAL LOTS ON
THE SOUTH SIDE OF VISTA BONITA
(APN 030-441-015)
(FREDERICK)
WHEREAS, Michael Frederick, P.O. Box 573, Atascadero, California 93423
(Applicant/Owner) applied for a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide one lot totaling 4.33 acres
into two parcels of 1.87 and 2.46 acres, gross; and,
WHEREAS, the proposed project has a General Plan Designation of SFR-Z (Single
Family Residential, 1.5 to 2.5 acre minimum) and, as conditioned, is in conformance with the
Land Use Element of the General Plan and all other applicable General Plan policies; and,
WHEREAS, the site is located in the RSF-Z (Residential Single Family, 1.5 to 2.5 acre
minimum) zoning district, which allows for the proposed use and density when certain findings
are made; and,
WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 2003-0066 were
prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA); and,
WHEREAS,the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the
proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and Tentative Parcel Map application on December 16,
2003 at 7:00 p.m. and considered testimony and reports from staff, the applicants, and the public;
and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended the City Council certify Mitigated
Negative Declaration 2003-0066; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended the City Council approve TPM
2002-0028 with the following changes:
1. Revise Planning Condition 8 to allow for the use of septic systems on the resulting
lots, and
2. All residential development on Proposed Parcel 1.
31
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council takes the following actions: •
SECTION 1. Certification of Negative Declaration. The City Council of the City of
Atascadero, hereby certifies Mitigated Negative Declaration 2003-0066 based on the following
findings:
1. The Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance
with CEQA; and,
2. The Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was presented to the Planning
Commission, and the information contained therein was considered by the
Planning Commission, prior to recommending action on the project for which it
was prepared; and,
3. The Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was presented to the City Council
and the information contained therein was considered by the Council, prior to
taking action on the project for which it was prepared; and,
4. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment when
mitigation measures are incorporated into the project.
5. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term
environmental goals.
6. The project does not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable.
7. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either
directly or indirectly.
SECTION-2. Findings for approval of subdivision.The City Council finds as follows:
1. The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the General Plan and
applicable zoning requirements.
2. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the
General Plan and applicable zoning requirements.
3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed.
4. The site is physically suitable for the density of development proposed.
•
32
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
5. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision will not cause
• substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish and
wildlife or their habitat.
6. The subdivision is consistent with the character of the immediate neighborhood.
7. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the
public at large for access through, or the use of property within, the proposed
subdivision; or substantially equivalent alternative easements are provided.
8. The proposed subdivision design and type of improvements proposed will not
cause serious public health problems.
SECTION 3. Approval. The City Council does hereby approve Tentative Parcel Map
2002-0028 (AT 01-091) to subdivide one parcel totaling 4.33 acres into two parcels of 1.87 and
2.46 acres each, subject to the following Conditions and Exhibits:
EXHIBIT A: Mitigated Negative Declaration
EXHIBIT B: Conditions of Approval
EXHIBIT C: Tentative Parcel Map 2002-0028
•
i
33
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
On motion by Council member and seconded by Council member
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following •
roll call vote:
AYES: ( )
NOES: ( )
ABSENT: ( )
ABSTAINED: ( )
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA
George Luna, Mayor
ATTEST:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
34
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
EXHIBIT A: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration
• Draft Resolution A
TPM 2002-0028
® CITY 0.FATASCADER0
PROPOSED MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECL4R4TTION #2003-0066
6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero,CA 93422 80 5146 1-5 03 5
Applicant: Michael Frederick,'P.O.Box 573,Atascadero,CA 93423 (805)466-5060
Project Title: Tentative Parcel Map 2002-0028 and Road Abandonment 2002-0009
Project Vista Bonita Avenue,Atascadero,C,JggR*,
Location: (San Luis Obispo County)APN'030-441-015
ProJect A proposed subdivision of a 4.33 acre,gross,lot into two individual parcels of 1.87 and 2.46 acres,
Description' gross,each. Proposed parcel l is currently developed with cellular facilities,which willb a confined
to that lot and proposed parcel 2 could be developed with a single-family residence. The property
will utilize the City's wastewater facilities and Atascadero Mutual Water Company will provide
water services. Abandonment of Vista Bonita Avenue,from El "Avenue,westerly to the qW de
sac terminus of Vista Bonita Avenue is also proposed.
General Plan Designation: SFR-Z,1.5 to 2.5 acre minimum,based on performance standards
. Zoning District: RSF-Z,1.5 to 2.5 acre minimum,based on performance standards
Findings:
1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment.
2. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvarnage of long-term environmental goals.
3. The project does not have jMpAgJ..ty.. )are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable.
4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly.,
Determination:
Bas ed on the above findings,and the information contained in the initial study 2003-0056(made a p art hereof by
reference and on file in the C ommunity Development Department),it has been determine d'that the ab ove proje ct will
not have an adverse impact on the environment when the following proposed mitigation measures are incorporated
into the project(see attachment).
Prepared By: Kerry A ftZaso.n,Associate Plamer
Date Posted: December 3,2003
Public'Review Ends: December 23,2003
Attachments: Vicinity
Tentative Parcel Map
Road Abandonment Exhibit
Aerial Photo
Initial Study 2003-0066
• L4�:'C+t„34L�i:.S"iY�.�^aasm.nuxFax pfYSiS i�w;
6501''$ t,M;k i " ;,S, FR.ta ., I F 0 Rl I 2 (q464 5V3-4 AY 6, 0;
35
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
EXHIBIT B: Conditions of Approval •
Draft Resolution A
TPM 2002-0028
Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program Timing Responsibility Mitigation
/Monitoring Measure
TPM 2002-0028(AT 01-091) PM: Parcel Map
GP:Grading Prmt PS:Planning Services
9230 Vista Bonita Avenue BP:Building Prmt BS:Building Services
TO:Temporary FD:Fire Department
Occupancy PD:Police Department
FO:Final CE:City Engineer
Occupancy WW:Wastewater
PI: Public CA:City Attorney
Improvements AMWC: Atascadero
Mutual Water Company
Planning Services -Standard Planning Conditions
1. The approval of this application shall become final, Ongoing PS
subject to the completion of the conditions of approval,
fourteen (14) days following the Planning Commission
approval unless prior to that time, an appeal to the
decision is filed as set forth in Section 9-1.111(b) of the
Zoning Ordinance.
2. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall be valid for FM PS
two years after its effective date. At the end of the
period, the approval shall expire and become null and •
void unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to
a written request received prior to the expiration date,
or a final map is recorded with the County Recorder's
Office.
3. The Community Development Department shall have FM PS
the authority to approve minor changes to the project
that (1) result in a superior site design or appearance,
and/or (2) address a construction design issue that is
not substantive to the Tentative Parcel Map.
4. A Parcel map drawn in substantial conformance with FM PS
the approved tentative map, and in compliance with all
conditions set forth herein, shall be submitted for
review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision
Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance.
5. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold Ongoing CA
harmless the City of Atascadero or its agents, officers,
and employees against any claim or action brought to
challenge an approval by the City, or any of its entities,
concerning the subdivision.
6. The final map shall be subject to additional fees for FM PS
park or recreation purposes (QUIMBY Act) as required
by City Ordinance.
36
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program Timing Responsibility Mitigation
/Monitoring Measure
TPM 2002-0028(AT 01-091) PM: Parcel Map
GP:Grading Prmt PS:Planning Services
9230 Vista Bonita Avenue BP:Building Prmt BS:Building Services
TO:Temporary FD:Fire Department
Occupancy PD:Police Department
FO:Final CE:City Engineer
Occupancy WW:Wastewater
PI: Public CA:City Attorney
Improvements AMWC: Atascadero
Mutual Water Company
Project Specific Conditions
FU FSS
rev.&Ned-and approved by the Gammun4y
8. GP/BP PW/PS/BS
Septic systems to
be allowed on these parcels.
9. All future development shall be consistent with the PM PS
Conditions of Approval detailed in Planning
Commission Resolution No. 2001-038.
10. All future proposals for cellular facilities shall be Ongoing PS
required to amend the existing Conditional Use
Permits and shall be required to co-locate on existing
facilities.
11. Prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant PM PS
shall submit a landscaping plan for all areas
previously disturbed and for the area surrounding the
gate on Vista Bonita. This landscaping plan shall be
reviewed and approved by the Community
Development Department and the landscaping shall
be installed prior to recordation of the final map.
Engineering Standard Conditions
12. In the event that the applicant is allowed to bond for FM CE
any public improvements required as a condition of
this map, the applicant shall enter into a Subdivision
Improvement Agreement with the City Council
13. An engineer's estimate of probable cost shall be FM CE
submitted for review and approval by the City
Engineer to determine the amount of the bond.
14. The Subdivision Improvement Agreement shall FM CE
record concurrently with the Final Map.
• 15. The applicant shall enter into a Plan Check/inspection FM CE
agreement with the City.
37
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program Timing Responsibility Mitigation
/Monitoring Measure
TPM 2002-0028(AT 01-091) PM: Parcel Map
GP:Grading Prmt PS:Planning Services
9230 Vista Bonita Avenue BP:Building Prmt BS:Building Services
TO:Temporary FD:Fire Department
Occupancy PD:Police Department
FO:Final CE:City Engineer
Occupancy WW:Wastewater
PI: Public CA:City Attorney
Improvements AMWC: Atascadero
Mutual Water Company
16. The applicant shall acquire title interest in any off-site FM CE
land that may be required to allow for the construction
of the improvements. The applicant shall bear all
costs associated with the necessary acquisitions.
The applicant shall also gain concurrence from all
adjacent property owners whose ingress and egress
is affected by these improvements.
17. Slope easements shall be obtained by the applicant FM CE
as needed to accommodate cut or fill slopes.
15. Drainage easements shall be obtained by the FM CE
applicant as needed to accommodate both public and
private drainage facilities. The applicant shall
address storm water detention prior to grading and
drainage approval.
18. A current preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be FM CE
submitted for review in conjunction with the
processing of the parcel map.
19. The final map shall be signed by the City Engineer FM CE
prior to the map being placed on the agenda for City
Council acceptance.
20. Prior to recording the final map, the applicant shall FM CE
pay all outstanding plan check/inspection fees.
21. Prior to recording the final map, the applicant shall FM CE
complete all improvements required by these
conditions of approval.
22. Prior to recording the final map, the applicant's FM CE
surveyor shall set monuments at all new property
corners. A registered civil engineer or licensed land
surveyor shall indicate by certificate on the parcel
map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a
date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable
the survey to be retraced.
23. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall FM CE
submit a map drawn in substantial conformance with
the approved tentative map and in compliance with all .
conditions set forth herein.The map shall be
38
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program Timing Responsibility Mitigation
• /Monitoring Measure
TPM 2002-0028(AT 01-091) PM: Parcel Map
GP:Grading Prmt PS:Planning Services
9230 Vista Bonita Avenue BP:Building Prmt BS:Building Services
TO:Temporary FD:Fire Department
Occupancy PD:Police Department
FO:Final CE:City Engineer
Occupancy WW:Wastewater
PI: Public CA:City Attorney
Improvements AMWC: Atascadero
Mutual Water Company
submitted for review and approval by the City in
accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the
City's Subdivision Ordinance.
24. All existing and proposed utility, pipeline, open space, FM CE
or other easements are to be shown on the final map.
If there are building or other restrictions related to the
easements,they shall be noted on the final map. The
applicant shall show all access restrictions on the
final map.
25. Prior to recording the final map,the applicant shall FM CE
have the map reviewed by all applicable public and
private utility companies (cable, telephone, gas,
electric, Atascadero Mutual Water Company). The
applicant shall obtain a letter from each utility
. company indicating their review of the map. The
letter shall identify any new easements that may be
required by the utility company. A copy of the letter
shall be submitted to the City. New easements shall
be shown on the final map.
26. All public improvements shall be constructed in FM CE
conformance with the City of Atascadero Engineering
Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or
as directed by the City Engineer.
27. The applicant shall be responsible for the relocation FM CE
and/or alteration of existing utilities.
28. The applicant shall install all new utilities (water, gas, FM CE
electric,cable TV and telephone) underground.
Utilities shall be extended to the property line frontage
of each lot or its public utility easement.
29. Prior to the final inspection of any public FM CE
improvements, the applicant shall submit a written
statement from a registered civil engineer that all
work has been completed and is in full compliance
with the approved plans.
. 30. The applicant shall monument all property corners for FM CE
construction control and shall promptly replace them
39
it
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program Timing Responsibility Mitigation
/Monitoring Measure
TPM 2002-0028(AT 01-091) PM: Parcel Map
GP:Grading Prmt
PS:Planning Services •
BS:Building Services
BP:Building Prmt ,
9
9230 Vista Bonita Avenue g FD:Fire Department
TO:Temporary
Occupancy PD:Police Department
FO:Final CE:City Engineer
Occupancy WW:Wastewater
PI: Public CA:City Attorney
Improvements AMWC: Atascadero
Mutual Water Company
if disturbed.
Engineering Project Specific Conditions
31. An ingress, egress and utility easement shall be FM CE
retained over Vista Bonita Avenue.
32. A road maintenance agreement shall be prepared for FM CE
maintenance of the private driveway, prior to
recordation of the final map. The agreement shall be
reviewed and approved by the City Engineer,
Community Development Director and the City
Attorney. After approval, the road maintenance shall
record concurrently with the final map.
Building/Fire Marshal:
33. Interior fully automatic fire sprinklers will be required for GP FD/PS/BS •
all new residential development.
34. All roads, access ways and driveways shall be built to GP FD/PS/BS
Fire Department standards, including turnouts and/or
turnarounds, as required. The short stretch of grade @
22% shown on the tentative map will be acceptable
due to the shallow bury of utilities.
35. All residential structures shall be within 800 feet of a GP FD/PS/BS
fire hydrant as measured along the road and
driveways. Water tanks will not be an acceptable
method of providing emergency water supplies.
Water Company:
36. The applicant shall design and construct the water FM AMWC
system improvements needed to serve the
subdivision. The water system improvements
required to serve the subdivision shall be private,
shall be operated and maintained by the applicant
and shall be isolated from the AMWC system with an
appropriate back-flow prevention device. The
applicant is responsible for designing and
constructing water system improvements that will
deliver water at the pressures and flows needed to
serve the subdivision. •
40
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program Timing Responsibility Mitigation
• /Monitoring Measure
TPM 2002-0028(AT 01-091) PM: Parcel Map
GP:Grading Prmt PS:Planning Services
9230 Vista Bonita Avenue BP:Building Prmt BS:Building Services
TO:Temporary FD:Fire Department
Occupancy PD:Police Department
FO:Final CE:City Engineer
Occupancy WW:Wastewater
PI: Public CA:City Attorney
Improvements AMWC: Atascadero
Mutual Water Company
37. AMWC expressly reserves and retains all rights and
privileges grated to it, among other things, to construct
and operate water facilities over, along, upon and
through the segment of the roadway alignment that is
to be abandoned. Said rights and privileges were
granted to AMWC by that certain Deed, dated October
20, 1914, and recorded in the Office of the County
Recorder, County of San Luis Obispo, State of
California, in Volume 113, at page 56.
MITIGATION MEASURES
Mitigation Measure 3.b.1: The project is conditioned to BS BS/PS 3.b.1
comply with all applicable District regulations pertaining to the
• control of fugitive dust(PM-10)as contained in sections 6.3,6.4
and 6.5 of the April 2003 Air Quality Handbook.
Section 6.3: Construction Equipment
• Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune
according to manufacturer's specifications.
• Fuel all off-road and portable diesel powered
equipment, including but not limited to bulldozers,
graders,cranes, loaders, scrapers, backhoes,
generator sets, compressors, auxiliary power units,
with ARB certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (Non-
taxed version suitable for use off-road).
• Maximize to the extent feasible, the use of diesel
construction equipment meeting the ARB's 1996 or
newer certification standard for off-road heavy-duty
diesel engines.
• Install diesel oxidation catalysts (DOC), catalyzed
diesels particulate filters (CDPF) or other District
approved emission reduction retrofit services
(Required for projects grading more than 4.0 acres of
continuously worked area).
Section 6.4: Activity Management Techniques
• Develop a comprehensive construction activity
management plan designed to minimize the amount
of large construction equipment operating during any
given time period.
• Schedule of construction truck trips during non-peak
41
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program Timing Responsibility Mitigation
/Monitoring Measure •
TPM 2002-0028(AT 01-091) PM: Parcel Map
GP:Grading Pant PS:Planning Services
9230 Vista Bonita Avenue BP:Building Prmt BS:Building Services
TO:Temporary FD:Fire Department
Occupancy PD:Police Department
FO:Final CE:City Engineer
Occupancy WW:Wastewater
PI: Public CA:City Attorney
Improvements AMWC: Atascadero
Mutual Water Company
hours to reduce peak hour emissions.
• Limit the length of the construction workday period, if
necessary.
• Phase construction activities, if appropriate.
Section 6.5: Fugitive PM10
All of the following measures shall be included on
grading, demolition and building plan notes:
A. Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible.
B. Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the
site. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph.
Reclaimed (non-potable)water should be used whenever possible.
C. All dirt stockpile areas should be sprayed daily as needed.
D. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project re-vegetation and landscape plans
should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities.
E. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial
grading should be sown with a fast-germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation is
established.
F. All disturbed soil areas not subject to revegatation should be stabilized using approved chemical soil
binder,jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the APCD.
G. All roadways, driveways,sidewalks, etc, to be paved should be complete as soon as possible. In
addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders
are used.
H. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the
construction site.
I. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least
two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance
with CVC Section 23114.
J. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or was off trucks and
equipment leaving the site.
K. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water
sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where feasible.
L. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the dust control program and to
order increased watering, as necessary, to prevent transport of dust off site. The name and telephone
number of such persons shall be provided to the APCD prior to land use clearance for map recordation
and land use clearance for finish grading of any structure.
Mitigation Measure 4.e.1: The Grading Plan shall identify tree BP Ps 4.e.1
protection fencing around the drip line of each existing on-site tree
and/or native shrub mass within 20 feet of construction activity.
•
42
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program Timing Responsibility Mitigation
/Monitoring Measure
TPM 2002-0028(AT 01-091) PM: Parcel Map
GP:Grading Prmt PS:Planning Services
9230 Vista Bonita Avenue BP:Building Prmt BS:Building Services
TO:Temporary FD:Fire Department
Occupancy PD:Police Department
FO:Final CE:City Engineer
Occupancy WW:Wastewater
PI: Public CA:City Attorney
Improvements AMWC: Atascadero
Mutual Water Company
Mitigation Measure 4.e.2: Grading and excavation and grading BP PS 4.e.2
work shall be consistent with the City of Atascadero Tree
Ordinance. Special precautions when working around native trees
include:
1. All existing trees outside of the limits of work shall remain.
2. Earthwork shall not exceed the limits of the project area.
3. Low branches in danger of being torn from trees shall be
pruned prior to any heavy equipment work being done.
4. Vehicles and stockpiled material shall be stored outside
the drip line of all trees.
5. All trees within the area of work shall be fenced for
protection with 4-foot chain link,snow,or safety fencing
placed per the approved tree protection plan. Tree
protection fencing shall be in place prior to any site
excavation or grading. Fencing shall remain in place until
completion of all construction activities.
6. Any roots that are encountered during excavation shall be
clean cut by hand and sealed with an approved tree seal.
. Mitigation Measure 6.b: All disturbed areas, not shown on the BP BS 6.b
project landscape plan for landscaping shall be hydro seeded with a
native seed mix. Erosion control measures shall include an erosion
control blanket for all 2:1 fill slopes.Affected areas that previously
contained native shrubs and vegetation shall be replanted with
similar plant species per an approved landscape plan.
Duration of the project:The contractor will be responsible for the
clean up of any mud or debris that is tracked out on to El Bordo Rd
and/or the private access drive by construction vehicles.
Mitigation Measure 6.c.d: A soils report shall be required to be BP BS 6.c.d
submitted with any future building permits by the building
department.The building plans will be required to follow the
recommendations of the soils report to assure safety for residents
and buildings.
QRS 9.b
Mitigation Measure 11 A All construction activities shall comply BP BS/PS 11.d
with the City of Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours of operation.
r
43
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
EXHIBIT C: Tentative Parcel Map
Draft Resolution A
TPM 2002-0028
[ s s
-Y���sld
-Mill
00
� � e
's ! : 9 70
yly
•
44
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
ATTACHMENT 2: Draft Resolution B
• TPM 2002-0028
9230 Vista Bonita Avenue
DRAFT RESOLUTION B
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO SUMMARILY VACATING A PORTION
OF VISTA BONITA AVENUE
PURSUANT TO SECTION 8331 OF THE
CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
(ROAD ABANDONMENT #2002-0009)
WHEREAS, Michael Frederick, P.O Box 573, Atascadero, California 93423 (Owner /
Applicant), applied for a Road Abandonment to abandon Vista Bonita Avenue right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project area has a General Plan Designation of SFR-Y (Single
Family Residential, 1 acre minimum) and the project is in conformance with the Circulation
Element of the General Plan and all other applicable General Plan policies; and
• WHEREAS, the Vista Bonita Avenue right-of way, as shown on the attached Exhibit A,
has not been improved for vehicular travel for a period of five consecutive years and no public
money has been expended for maintenance on the street during such period; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the
proposed Road Abandonment on December 16, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. and considered testimony and
reports from staff, the applicants, and the public; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends summarily vacating a portion of
Vista Bonita Avenue to the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the
proposed Road Abandonment on February 24, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. and considered testimony and
reports from the Planning Commission, staff, the applicants, and the public;
NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council takes the following actions:
SECTION 1. Environmental Review. The City Council has certified the proposed
Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for TPM 2002-0028 and RAB 2002-0009.
SECTION 2. Findings of Approval. The City Council finds as follows:
•
45
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
1. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan.
2. Vista Bonita ta Avenue, proposed to be abandoned has been not passable for vehicular •
travel for a period of five consecutive years and no public money has been expended for
maintenance on the street during such period.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Atascadero does
hereby approve Road Abandonment 2002-0009 as shown on Exhibit A and subject to Conditions
of Approval contained in Exhibit B.
•
46
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
On motion by Council member and seconded by Council member
• , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: ( )
NOES: ( )
ABSENT: ( )
ABSTAINED: ( )
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA
George Luna, Mayor
•
ATTEST:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
i
47
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
EXHIBIT A: Vista Bonita Road Abandonment Map
Draft Resolution B
RAB 2002-0009
LJ O
� 0� LL-
OF E
r
0 0 t—Z M
z Z— O
w
'L MWotn¢
Lj
0)o a LLJ
oJ0 0
Z w< y OD�O m¢N(/)J N
CL W Z QHQ V II
�.. HLL-
Q o LLI0 z
}
0 0
,n Qo f1Q Zw J
moo wOFaUo N-
oZLi
z= n dSUU(n N
¢aa o
m sLL
N
M
< m O W p ~O.
O 0� Oz U)a moll J
J ¢^ �0 UOQ
CLs Q¢ o
CL�- ¢N
(� Q J,LLJ 00I
MM M Q J
W N
O Q a¢
fix/ O
LO
WN
N J I
H W�
U,m
OJ �� O Of
I CL
WObi d
U
�J
Q Q
aF
F Q `
o fYvl�n�/j
to
to
w to I ry
N cp
O
O a� .Y 1 W
w t
�h
>W 0 M M ct)
W<�.ON O
OZ0Wo t
o OmZ�z ~ 9' q
r%f Cf Q G
O
d
O OJ oq
pp
r �!
to
N O Q�
M M
n n
48
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 02/24/04
EXHIBIT B: Vista Bonita Road Abandonment Conditions of Approval
Draft Resolution B
RAB 2002-0009
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and/or alteration of existing
utilities within the existing Vista Bonita Avenue right of way.
2. The applicant shall enter into a Plan Check/Inspection agreement with the City. All
outstanding plan/check inspection fees shall be paid prior to the final inspection.
3. The applicant shall have the map reviewed by all applicable public and private
utility companies (cable, telephone, gas, electric, Atascadero Mutual Water
Company). The applicant shall obtain a letter from each utility company, which
indicates their review of the map. The letter shall identify any new easements that
may be required by the utility company. Letters from utility companies shall be
submitted to the City prior to recordation of the parcel map.
4. The applicant shall acquire title or interest in any off-site land that may be required
to allow for the construction of the an improvements to relocate existing utilities.
p Y
The applicant shall bear all costs associated with the necessary acquisitions. The
i applicant shall also gain concurrence from all property owners whose ingress and
egress is affected by these improvements.
5. Parcel Map AT 01-091 shall be recorded concurrently with the abandonment of the
existing Vista Bonita Avenue right of way.
6. As part of the abandonment procedure, the City shall retain a storm drain
easement and public utility easement covering the right of way. A metes and
bounds description shall be prepared and found acceptable. This shall be shown
on the document to be recorded.
7. The property owner shall indemnify and hold harmless the city from claims that
may arise from the abandonment procedure. This agreement shall be reviewed
and found acceptable by the City Attorney.
8. A slope maintenance easement shall be provided on the sides of the right of way
as needed to maintain cut or fill slopes.
•
49
ITEM NUMBER: C-1
DATE: 02/24/04
■ ■� . m
9"
CAD�f
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report Public Works Department
2004 Community Development Block Grant Allocation
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council forward to the County Board of Supervisors allocation recommendations
for the 2004 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds as follows:
:
• Atascadero Redevelopment Agency— Streetlight Replacement 25,000
City of Atascadero —ADA Improvements — City Facilities and 67,679
Infrastructure
North County Women's Resource Center/Shelter— Interior Painting 4,000
0 *€
pad
City of Atascadero— Homeless Services 2,345
Community Link— Senior Health Fair 1,000
Community Services Foundation — Youth Activity Scholarship Fund 7,000
EI Camino Homeless Organization —Operating Expenses 15,000
E.O.C. — Forty Wonderful Program — Health Screening 1,000
Literacy Council — Atascadero Program 1,500
Loaves and Fishes — Groceries 6,000
,
City of Atascadero�
— Code Enforcement 50,000
&.
City Program Administration Costs — Maximum 20% 45,131
50
ITEM NUMBER: C-1
DATE: 02/24/04
DISCUSSION:
Background: Preparation of the 2004 CDBG Consolidated Plan began in the fall of
2003. - Workshops were held throughout the County to solicit public comment on
community needs. The County published a request for CDBG proposals. The City
received 23 applications for CDBG funds totaling $401,481. The City has an estimated
$225,655 in CDBG funds available.
CDBG funds are available for community development activities, which meet at least
one of the three national objectives:
1. A benefit to low and moderate-income persons;
2. Aid in the prevention or elimination of blight;
3. Address urgent needs that pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or
welfare of the community.
In order for a program to qualify under the low and moderate income objective, at least
51% of the persons benefiting from the project or program must earn no more than
80% of the area median. Additionally, at least 70% of the CDBG funds must be spent
toward this objective.
The following criteria should also be used to guide selection of CDBG programs:
1. The proposal is consistent with the national objectives and eligibility criteria of
•
the HUD CDBG program;
2. The proposal is consistent with the Urban County Consolidated Plan;
3. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan and other City codes/ordinances.
4. The proposal will achieve multiple community development objectives;
5. The proposal can be implemented in a timely manner, without significant
environmental, policy, procedural, legal,or fiscal obstacles to overcome; and
6. The project is not financially feasible without CDBG funding.
51
I
ITEM NUMBER: G-1
DATE: 02/24/04
Summary: The following is a summary by category of each application received:
PUBLIC FACILITIES
Atascadero Redevelopment Agency— Street Light Replacement
Funds Requested: $25,000
Recommended Funding: $ 25,000
The proposed project is designed to increase pedestrian safety by providing pedestrian
lighting in the downtown core area. Improved lighting will support downtown
revitalization efforts in support of evening shopping and events.
City of Atascadero — ADA Improvements— City Facilities and Infrastructure
Funds Requested: $100,000
Recommended Funding: $67,679
This project provides for the removal of accessibility barriers at all city facilities. Project
includes, in part, sidewalk modifications, bathroom compliance upgrades, door
hardware replacements, audible and visual warning systems, ramping issues and
access to facilities.
North County Women's Resource Center— Interior Painting
• Funds Requested: $4,000
Recommended Funding: $4,000
North County Women's Resource Center provides assistance to women and children
who are victims of domestic violence. Approximately 95% of their clients meet the low
to very low-income criteria. The proposed project would clean, patch and paint interior
walls of the Atascadero Shelter.
PUBLIC SERVICES
City of Atascadero — Homeless Services
Recommended Funding: $2,345
To create a fund for various homeless service needs that arise during the 2004 cycle.
Atascadero Community Link— Senior Health Faire
Funds Requested: $1,050
Recommended Funding: $1,000
Annual Health Faire, which provides health screening and information regarding
services available to seniors such as insurance, recreation, safety, housing and
nutrition.
•
52
ITEM NUMBER: C-1
DATE: 02/24/04
Atascadero Community Services Foundation — Youth Activity Scholarship Fund
Funds Requested: $7,500
Recommended Funding: $7,000
The Community Services Foundation has established a scholarship fund to assist
families of low-income youth to participate in recreational and social activities. Because
this program is limited to low-income youth, the benefit criteria will be met.
EI Camino Homeless Organization — Intake Workers and Operating Expenses
Funds Requested: $15,000
Recommended Funding: $15,000
ECHO operates a facility to provide meals for the homeless. They provide space for
clients to meet with counselors, housing specialists, medical personnel and volunteers.
Economic Opportunity Commission — Forty Wonderful Program
Funds Requested: $2,000
Recommended Funding: $1,000
E.O.C. is requesting funding from all agencies for the "Forty Wonderful Program" which
is designed to improve access to medical services, early detection and intervention of
chronic diseases and reduce mortality for low-income women age 40 and older. •
Literacy Council — Atascadero Program
Funds Requested: $3,000
Recommended Funding: $1,500
This organization is requesting funds to recruit and prepare volunteers as tutors. Client
information will be collected to ensure compliance with income.
Loaves and Fishes — Groceries for Needy Families
Funds Requested: $6,000
Recommended Funding: $6,000
Loaves and Fishes operate an emergency food pantry for very low and low-income
residents. They are requesting funds to purchase groceries.
•
53
ITEM NUMBER: C-1
DATE: 02/24/04
CODE ENFORCEMENT
City of Atascadero— Code Enforcement
Funds Requested: $50,000
Recommended Funding: $50,000
This program would provide code enforcement services for low income, deteriorated
and redevelopment areas where addressing the violations could be expected to arrest
the decline of the area.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FUNDING THIS YEAR
Atascadero Christian Home— Site Improvements
Funds Requested: $42,500
Recommended Funding: Not recommended for funding this cycle
Atascadero Christian Home is requesting funds to purchase a salad bar, a pendant
alarm system, and construct upgrades to their facility including enclosing a breezeway
and driveway repair.
The Family Care Network— Laundry Facility
Funds Requested: $25,000
• Recommended Funding: Not recommended for funding this cycle
With the planned expansion of the existing facility, the laundry room will be remodeled
for additional living units. The Applicant is requesting funds to construct a new laundry
facility.
Atascadero Redevelopment Agency — Sidewalk Construction in Redevelopment
Area
Funds Requested: $15,000
Recommended Funding: Not recommended for funding this cycle
Project would provide for completing sections of sidewalk in the downtown core area.
Big Brothers/Big Sisters — Mentoring Program
Funds Requested: $7,500
Recommended Funding: Not recommended for funding this cycle
This organization is requesting funding to be used for Empowerment Training for at-risk
children and their guardians and for volunteer training for Big Brothers and Big Sisters.
Loaves and Fishes — Utility Support for Center
Funds Requested: $5,000
• Recommended Funding: Not recommended for funding this cycle
Loaves and Fishes are requesting funds for payment of gas and electric charges at
their building at 5411 EI Camino Real.
54
ITEM NUMBER: C-1
DATE: 02/24/04
Economic Opportunity Commission — Senior Health Screening •
Funds Requested: $5,000
Recommended Funding: Not recommended for funding this cycle
E.O.C. is also requesting funds from all agencies to support the Senior Health
Screening program. Funds would cover testing and expenses.
Economic Opportunity Commission —Teen Parenting Program
Funds Requested: $3,600
Recommended Funding: Not recommended for funding this cycle
The Teen Parenting Program ensures that pregnant and parenting teens receive health
and education support.
Homeless Housing Project— Motel Voucher Program
Funds Requested: $10,000
Recommended Funding: Not recommended for funding this cycle
The Homeless Housing Project is requesting funds to provide motel vouchers to the
homeless population.
Homeless Housing Project— Vehicle expenses for Furniture Program
Funds Requested: $3,000 •
Recommended Funding: Not recommended for funding this cycle
The Homeless Housing Project is requesting funds to help cover the cost of operating a
truck which is used to pickup donated furniture and distribute to previously homeless
families when housing is obtained.
Dream for Kids Foundation Scholarships
Funds Requested: $5,000
Recommended Funding: Not recommended for funding this cycle
Funds are requested to start a scholarship program, which would provide vocational,
educational and professional scholarships to youth in the foster care system.
Economic Opportunity Commission — Home Repair Program
Funds Requested: $12,000
Recommended Funding: Not recommended for funding this cycle
This program provides needed home repairs for lower income families, seniors and
disabled individuals. These repairs include the removal of architectural barriers, roof
repairs, plumbing repairs, etc.
i
55
ITEM NUMBER: C-1
DATE: 02/24/04
Cuesta College— Small Business Development Center
Funds Requested: $3,000
Recommended Funding: Not recommended for funding this cycle
Funds are requested to provide business consulting for existing and start-up
businesses for low to middle income residents and business owners in San Luis Obispo
County.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Available funds are estimated at $225,655 for the 2004 cycle.
ALTERNATIVES:
Council may modify the grant recommendations made by Staff. However, awards must
meet program requirements, providing a minimum of 70% of funding for benefit to low
and moderate-income persons, and no more than 15% can be allocated to public
service items.
56
ITEM NUMBER: C-2
DATE: 02/24/04
sa � ■
iais e
CADF�/
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report - City Manager's Office
Masonic Temple/Printery Building Disposition
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Council evaluate the City's options and give staff direction on Council's preferred course
of action.
DISCUSSION:
• In August of 2003 the City Council voted to return the Printery building to the
Atascadero Masonic Temple Association. The agreements to facilitate the return were
not completed prior to the San Simeon Earthquake. The Printery sustained significant
damage in the quake. Since the building remains in public ownership it maybe eligible
for public assistance funds through FEMA and OES. This could provide for the
rehabilitation of the structure and eventual use as a youth center consistent with the
original agreement with the Masons. The City Council discussed the opportunities
associated with the Printery and their current policy of returning the building to the
Temple Association at their recent Strategic Planning Workshop. The Council directed
the City Manager to discuss options with the Masons and return the item to the Council
Agenda.
The City of Atascadero and the Atascadero Masonic Temple Association have shared
ownership and occupancy of the historic Printery building since 1994, when the
Atascadero Masonic Temple Association donated 99% ownership to the City of
Atascadero. The donation contemplated the building being renovated for the purposes
of a Youth Center. The Atascadero Masonic Temple Association in a letter dated
February 24, 2000, requested the return of the building in accordance with the original
intent and spirit of the Joint Occupancy Agreement, and the Council concurred in 2003.
Even though the building sustained damage in the quake, the Masons and their project
developer, Kelly Gearhart, are willing to complete the agreement and have the building
transferred to the Masons and eventually Mr. Gearhart. The property has been listed
on the California Register of Historic Places and the National Register of Historic
57
ITEM NUMBER: C-2
DATE: 02/24/04
Places; thus, it is a significant resource under CEQA. Therefore, any attempt to
demolish, alter or develop the building or property is subject to CEQA review.
The Council has been evaluating an option wherein the City would maintain ownership
of the building and use the public assistance funds to rehabilitate the structure as 'a
combined youth center/Masonic Hall. There are questions regarding the eligibility of the
project and funding available. This option would keep the building under public
ownership, preserving the public access to the historical structure. It also includes an
ongoing cost for maintenance, which would be partially offset if used as a youth center.
The Masonic Temple Association is concerned about the future of the building and
facilities for their various groups. The current agreement does require the City to
provide reasonable meeting facilities after 60 days. The Masonic Lodge has indicated
that the Pavilion is likely unsatisfactory for their needs although the Eastern Star group
is open to the possibility of meeting in the Boy Scout room. Any meetings will require
storage space for their furniture and props as well as space in the Pavilion facility.
The Association apparently prefers to have the building returned to them allowing the
transfer to Mr. Gearhart and eventually a new building for their use. They are
concerned that the renovation to the building could take many years displacing them for
an exaggerated period. They also fear that the City may not maintain the new building
in a fashion that meets their needs. They were frustrated with the City's management
of the Printery building in the pre-earthquake period. •
The two options being considered, returning the building to the Masons and keeping it,
are consistent with the General Plan goals of preserving the Printery.
FISCAL IMPACT:
If the City retains the building there will be costs associated with the reconstruction and
ongoing maintenance and operations costs.
58
ITEM NUMBER: D- 1
DATE: 02/24/2004
n
• 191$ � 1978
Atascadero City Council
City Attorney Report
Emergency Resolution
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council adopt the draft Resolution continuing in full force and effect the resolutions
declaring the existence of a state of emergency and directing the City Manager to take
direct and immediate acts to repair or replace public facilities and authorize the mayor
to execute it.
DISCUSSION:
• Government Code sections 8550 et se rant emergency powers to Cities in dealing
q 9 g yp g
with a natural disaster such as an earthquake. As the Director of Emergency Services
the City Manager is authorized to issue a declaration declaring a state of emergency.
The declaration gives the city certain powers and immunities that do not exist in the
absence of such a declaration. The declaration is also required for many FEMA or other
reimbursement purposes. Such a declaration by the Director/City Manager must be
ratified by the City Council within seven (7) days and the City Council must thereafter
review the matter again within 21 days in order for the declaration to remain in force
and effect. The City Council met in emergency session on December 24, 2003 and
passed such a resolution. This regular council meeting is within 21 days of the prior
resolution.
Pursuant to Public Contract Code section 22050 the City Manager has the authority
under the declared emergency to take immediate action to procure necessary
equipment, services, and supplies for the purposes of repairing and or replacing public
facilities. Such acts must also be ratified within seven (7) days by action of the City
Council and the City Council may direct that the City Manager continue to take such
direct actions without following contract bid procedures. To do so the City Council must
find, based upon facts contained in the minutes (but not required to be in the resolution
or in a written staff report) that the emergency will not permit a delay resulting from a
competitive solicitation for bids and the action is necessary to respond to the
emergency. This action requires a 4/5 vote for approval, or if less than 5 are present a
unanimous vote of the City Council. This action must likewise be reviewed within 21
59
ITEM NUMBER: D- 1
DATE: 02/24/2004
days for the powers to continue. The City Council also ratified and so directed the City
Manager at its meetings of December 24, 2003, January 13, 2004, January 27, 2004
and February 10, 2004. The City Council, if it finds that the facts still warrant based
upon the presentation of staff, may also continue the contracting procedures in full
force and effect.
The conditions expressed in the oral reports of December 24, 2003, January 13, 2004,
January 27, 2004 and February 10, 2004 still exist. City facilities and City services are
not yet restored to the level that we can provide services at the expected level. If we
were to have to follow normal contracting procedures we would be unduly delayed (by
weeks) in our ability to restore the public facilities. We will continue to place these
declarations on all regular agendas until the cause for the suspension of contracting
procedures no longer exists and until the emergency is no longer current. We are still
suffering aftershocks and additional damage to public facilities. The full extent of the
damage and the reasonable measures to fix them are not yet known.
FISCAL IMPACT: Unknown
ALTERNATIVES: None
ATTACHMENT: Draft Resolution
60
DRAFT RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
CONTINUING PROCLAMATION OF EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL
EMERGENCY AND AUTHORIZING EMERGENCY CONTRACTING
PROCEDURES
(by City Council of Atascadero acting through its Mayor)
WHEREAS, Atascadero Municipal Code Title 4 Chapter 4, Emergency
Organization and Functions, empowers the Director of Emergency Services to proclaim
the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency when said city is affected or
likely to be affected by a public calamity and the City Council is not is session; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Emergency Services of the City of Atascadero did
find;
That conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property have arisen
within said city, caused by earthquake; and
That the City Council of the City of Atascadero is not in session (and cannot be
immediately be called into session);
WHEREAS, the Director of Emergency Services did, based upon those findings,
declare a local emergency pursuant to local, State, and Federal Law, on December 23,
2003; and
WHEREAS, the City Council convened for an emergency meeting pursuant to
State Law at the earliest possible time and within 7 days .of such proclamation on
December 24, 2003, which meeting was duly noticed pursuant to the emergency
meeting procedures contained in the Ralph M. Brown Act; and
WHEREAS, The City Council also ratified and authorized the use of emergency
contracting powers by the City Manager; and
WHEREAS, The City Council revisited the issues and proclaimed the
continuation of the emergency and re directed the City Manager to take direct and
immediate action to restore public facilities on January 13, 2004, January 27, 2004, and
February 10, 2004; and
WHEREAS, The City Council is required to revisit those resolutions within at
least 21 days for them to remain in force, and
WHEREAS, the conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property,
and the conditions authorizing the use of emergency contracting powers by the City
61
Manager did and still exist within Atascadero, caused by earthquake and subsequent
after shocks.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY PROCLAIMED that:
1. The Resolutions proclaiming an emergency and authorizing and direct the City
Manager to take direct and immediate action to restore public buildings and services are
hereby continued in full force and effect; and
2. A local emergency now and still exists throughout the City of Atascadero; and
IT IS FURTHER PROCLAIMED AND ORDERED that during the existence of
said local emergency the powers, functions, and duties of the emergency organization
of this city shall be those prescribed by state law, by ordinances, and resolutions of this
city, as approved by the City Council
This resolution was unanimously adopted by the City Council of the City of Atascadero
on February 24, 2004 in Atascadero, California, and the Mayor was directed to execute
it.
Dated: By:
Dr. George Luna, Mayor
City Of Atascadero .
62
COUNCIL MEETING
02/24/04
EXHIBIT A
ATASCADERO HEALTH COLLABORATIVE
• A partnership with the Atascadero Youth Task Force
5805 Capistrano Ave, Suite G, Atascadero, Ca. 93422
(805) 466-5465 Fax: (805) 466-5343
Web address: atascaderoyouth.com
Email: link@calinet.com
February 18, 2004
City Council
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Ave
Atascadero, Ca 93422
Dear Council Members:
The Health Collaborative encourages you to support the CBDG grant request of the Atascadero
Youth Task Force for partial funding of the annual SENIOR HEALTH FAIRE. This important
event provides seniors with an opportunity to receive various health screenings, flu shots, and
vital information relating to senior issues, particularly health related services.
For three years the Atascadero Health Collaborative in cooperation with the Atascadero Youth
Task Force has sponsored this event providing the seed money to establish this as an annual
community service event. In those three years over 600 seniors have benefited from this event.
The Health Collaborative will continue to support this effort with volunteers and funds. The
CBDG grant will provide the balance of the necessary funds to make this year's Health Faire a
success.
Thank you for your kind consideration and we are looking forward to another great SENIOR
HEALTH FAIRE.
Sincerely,
Dale Magee
Coordinator, Atascadero Health Collaborative