Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 042892 Minutes Approved as Submitted 5/26/92 ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL APRIL 28, 1992 MINUTES The Mayor called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. Councilperson Dexter led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Nimmo, Lilley, Borgeson, Dexter and Mayor Shiers Absent: None Also Present: Muriel "Micki" Korba, City Treasurer and Lee Raboin, City Clerk Staff Present: Ray Windsor, City Manager; Henry Engen, Community Development Director; Art Montandon, City Attorney; Mark Joseph, Administrative Services Director; Greg Luke, Public Works Director; Andy Takata, Community Services Director; Mike McCain, Acting Fire Chief and Lt. Bill Watton, Police Department COUNCIL COMMENTS: Mayor Shiers announced that there would be a nationwide effort of prayer for moral rebirth of America on the steps of City Hall on Thursday May 7th at approximately 12:30 p.m. Councilwoman Borgeson reported that she had seen numerous articles in the Atascadero news relating to scholastic and athletic achievements of the local youth. She suggested that the City Council should, through the mayor, acknowledge in some way those outstanding accomplishments. PROCLAMATIONS: Mayor Shiers read the proclamation for "Municipal Clerk's Week", May 3 - 9th, 1992 and presented it to City Clerk, Lee Raboin. He also mentioned that the Clerk had recently been awarded a $200.00 scholarship from the International Institute of Municipal Clerks to go towards tuition costs for continuing education and CC04/28/92 Page 1 certification. Fred Motlo, Atascadero Fire Department; and Maureen Johnson and Art Lehr, both of San Luis Ambulance, were present and jointly accepted the proclamation for "Emergency Medical Services Week", May 10-16, 1992. Mayor Shiers read and presented a proclamation for "National Police Week", May 11-17, 1992 to Lt. Barlow. Mayor Shiers also read proclamations for "Victims of Pornography Week", May 3-9, 1992 and "Small Business Opportunities Day", June 16, 1992. Councilman Nimmo reported that he had received a call from a resident who is a builder by trade who indicated that he was giving up building in Atascadero. He remarked that the caller had stated that he would confine his activities to the City of Paso Robles. _ Councilman Nimmo stated that this was another example of entrepre- neurship in Atascadero not receiving the kind of support and welcome it properly deserves. COMMUNITY FORUM: Jeff Farkas, 4580 Viscano, asked staff to define "chartered franchise". City Attorney, Art Montandon, indicated that he was not familiar with the term but explained the types of franchise agreements granted by the City. Iry Jenkins, Pismo Beach resident, announced that Sanoform Corporation would be taking over Chicago Grande Landfill on May 1, 1992 and noted that certain improvements would be made. He indicated that residents would be happy with the changes and invited questions. Terry Graham, 6205 Conejo Road, spoke in support of the people electing the mayor and asked Councilwoman Borgeson to introduce the concept at the next election. In addition, he criticized a recent decision to change the publication of ordinances in the newspaper. Leo Korba, 10905 Santa Ana Road, responded to a commentary in the Atascadero News regarding the publication of ordinances and thanked the Council for taking the necessary action to save money. He added that the recommendation of staff made sense. In addition, Mr. Korba commented that he was opposed to a mayor running the City and believed City staff appointed by the Council was the only way for a small city to be run. Terry Graham remarked that he did not mean to insinuate that he wanted to see managerial duties taken from the City Manager and CC04/28/92 Page 2 clarified that he thought an elected mayor would end turmoil resulting from staff turnover. Councilman Nimmo asserted that the last four years under the direction of City Manager Ray Windsor had been a productive period and observed that most residents appreciate that. A. COMMITTEE REPORTS (The following represent ad hoc or standing committees. Informative status reports were given, as follows) : 1. S.L.O. Area Coordinating Council/Regional Transit Authority - Councilwoman Borgeson reported that SLOACC and SLORTA had met on April 8, 1992 and highlighted the important issues addressed. (Minutes on file with the City Clerk) 2. Recycling Committee Mayor Shiers reported that the committee had put together a new brochure and were looking at educational programs for use in elementary schools. He noted that a waste audit had been conducted and local business persons were asking for a way to recycle cardboard. 3. Economic Opportunity Commission - Councilman Dexter reported that a site had been selected for a second "Head Start" program. 4. City/School Committee - Councilman Dexter announced that the next meeting would be May 21, 1992. 5. Traffic Committee - Councilman Dexter reported that the committee had met and received requests for action. The Public Works Director indicated that these matters would be brought before the Council at the next meeting. 6. Economic Round Table - The City Manager stated that the round table had met, but taken no action because Councilman Lilley was absent. He reported that the next meeting would be May 20, 1992 and discussion would include what future direction the committee will take. Councilwoman Borgeson mentioned that she and Councilman Nimmo had been meeting with the Procurement Committee. In addition, she noted that she and Councilman Dexter had been meeting with the Coalition for the Homeless and requested staff add these two committees to the list of reports given at future meetings. CC04/28/92 Page 3 B. CONSENT CALENDAR: Mayor Shiers read the Consent Calendar, as follows: 1. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 14, 1992 2. CONSOLIDATED TREASURER'S REPORT - MARCH, 1992 3. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 25-89, 5805 CAPISTRANO - Consideration of a one-year time extension (Hotel Park - Messer/Lewis) 4. RESOLUTION NO. 39-92 - DECLARING WEEDS A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND COMMENCING PROCEEDINGS FOR ABATEMENT 5. RESOLUTION NO. 40-92 - SUPPORTING S8 1691: ELIGIBILITY FOR INTERCITY RAIL CORRIDOR BOND FUNDING Councilwoman Borgeson pulled Item #B-1. Eric Greening pulled Item #B-3. MOTION: By Councilman Lilley, seconded by Councilman Nimmo to approve the Consent Calendar with the exceptions of Items #B-1 and B-3; motion carried unanimously by roll call vote. Re: Item B-1 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 14, 1992 Councilwoman Borgeson and Councilman Lilley voiced objection to receiving the minutes too late to review them. MOTION: By Councilman Lilley, seconded by Councilwoman Borgeson to continue Item #B-1 to the next Consent Calendar agenda; motion carried unanimously. Re Item B-3 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 25-89, 5805 CAPISTRANO - Consideration of a one-year time extension (Hotel Park - Messer/Lewis) Eric Greening, 7365 Valle Avenue, asked what effect the proposed Highway 41 realignment would have on this project. Henry Engen, Community Development Director, replied that the precise plan and tentative tract map were designed around access to Highway 41 and explained that the conditions call for guarantees for access either onto Highway 41, by bonding or by providing other kinds of access if the realignment does not occur. Mr. Engen clarified that if the realignment does not go through, staff would meet with the appli- cants to determine how to meet the condition for proper access. Mr. Greening indicated that his concern had been addressed. MOTION: By Councilman Dexter, seconded by Councilman Lilley to CC04/28/92 Page 4 approve the one-year time extension; motion carried 5:0. C. HEARINGS: 1. ORDINANCE NO. 243 ESTABLISHING MANDATORY TRASH COLLECTION CITY-TIDE Greg Luke, Public Works Director, provided background and reviewed the staff recommendation. Individual Council comments followed. Councilwoman Borgeson shared concern about the effect the proposed ordinance would have upon elderly and handicapped residents. In addition, she voiced opposition to the City not going out to bid for garbage service. Councilman Dexter mentioned that the Council had already agreed to give the service to Wil-Mar Disposal and reported that Wil-Mar had purchased equipment based on the approved contract. He asserted that it was not appropriate to debate the matter at that time and suggested that the issue be looked at when the present contract runs out. Councilman Dexter agreed with Councilwoman Borgeson that certain hardship cases may merit some consideration. The Public Works Director indicated that it was difficult to single out who is entitled to preferential treatment and pointed out that Wil-Mar's rate for one-can service (with curbside recycling) is the lowest in the County. Councilwoman Borgeson asserted that the Americans with Disabilities Act now requires cities to serve the handicapped and urged staff to note this state mandate when negotiating contracts for services to the public. Councilwoman Borgeson reported that she had received calls from the public about the rental fee for the yellow curbside recycling bin and asked if the cost could be negotiated. She indicated that some had expressed a desire to buy the bin outright, rather than pay a monthly fee for it. Mr. Luke replied that staff can look at a variety of options and bring them back to the Council. He added that the Council has the ability and power to control the rates. Mayor Shiers referred to Wil-Mar's financial statement (prepared by David K. Smith, Certified Public Accountant) and asked for an explanation of a 116% return" . Mark Joseph advised that the Council receive a specific response from a representative from Wil-Mar (see page 7) • Noting the April 22, 1992 letter from Wil-Mar's attorney Betty Sanders, Councilman Lilley reported that projections for rates and CC04/28/92 Page 5 an economy of scale were different than what he had been led to believe would occur. Mr. Luke, in response, reported that the present program is working sufficiently and Wil-Mar is operating at peak efficiency. He indicated that revenues were expected to be low because in order for Wil-Mar to serve additional customers, it will have to add services. Charges for those services, he clarfied would be based on the rates reflected by Council's chosen policy to encourage trash reduction. Councilman Nimmo suggested that, before going further, Council allow Steve Devencenzi from the San Luis Obispo Area Coordinating Council to give, for the benefit of the public, an explanation of the mandates set forth by the State in AB939. Mr. Devencenzi provided an overview of the legislation and fine provisions. He reported that Atascadero was the only city in the County without mandatory garbage collection. Responding to questions from the Council, Mr. Devencenzi remarked that the State will require a waste generation study to be conducted in the future to compare with one prepared in 1990 to evaluate the reduction in solid waste. He explained that it may be necessary to employ a material recovery facility which would sort out all garbage taken to the landfill, but added that this might be avoided if all cities cooperate in implementing all related programs possible. Public Comments: Jeff Farkas spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance asserting that mandatory pick-up is not needed and that emphasis should be placed on other issues. He mentioned that there was a need for localized way to get rid of cardboard materials. Richard Moen, 4200 Portola, expressed doubt that mandatory pick-up would reduce the amount of solid waste going to the dump and proclaimed that a more effective way would be to encourage the community to do more recycling. In addition, he asked the Council to look into the possibility of Wil-Mar offering the element of curbside pick-up service only. Renee Silberman, member of the Recycling Committee, expressed the views of the committee and indicated support. She mentioned that the curbside recycling program offers pick-up for those so many items, including those that do not have a monetary redemption value. Roger Cook, 10600 Colorado Road, protested an unnecessary tax on senior citizens and proclaimed that it would be better to educate people about how to recycle than impose mandatory pick-up. Gary Kirkland, 4640 Portola Road, spoke in opposition and declared that if Council imposes mandatory pick-up, it should give the CC04/28/92 Page 6 residents a choice of who will be the waste hauler and to what landfill trash can be taken. Al Sherman, 7340 Navajoa, also objected to mandated trash pick-up. He remarked that government should begin regulating products to ensure that they can be recycled. In addition, he suggested that Wil-Mar go back to selling trash bags to be placed on the curb when they are full. Susan Litteral, 8605 San Rafael was opposed and asked how mandatory pick-up would encourage waste reduction. Lindsey Hampton, 8402 Alta Vista, exhibited a variety of plastic and stryofoam containers that Wil-Mar is willing to pick up and proclaimed that she thought the curbside recycling program would indeed encourage more recycling. Ken Gouff, 4400 Portola, voiced objection to the City mandating trash pick-up by Wil-Mar and indicated that the service should be taken to the competitive bid process. Terry Graham, 6205 Conejo Road, suggested that the City may favor mandatory pick-up because it will increase its' revenue from the franchise agreement. In addition, he complained about rate increases at the dump and about certain landfill policies. He declared that County residents were actively working toward protecting the environment and did not need government mandates. Iry Jenkins, responding to Mr. Graham' s comments, invited him to come to the landfill and take all the scrap metal and wood he wanted because Sanoform Corporation has trouble getting rid of it. Ron Silberman, 9210 Lucinda, indicated that some of his neighbors were against mandatory pick-up. He pointed out that these same neighbors were disposing their garbage in a questionable manner. The following speakers provided additional testimony: Richard Moen urged Council to consider the fact that most of the public testimony they have received has been in opposition. Jeff Parkas asserted that some people will not participate regardless of the mandate. Gary Kirkland asked why not allow other entrepreneurs to have an opportunity to provide the recycling component. Roger Cook stated customers should pay for only what they put out at the curb and remarked that education is the only way to promote recycling. Terry Graham mentioned that he hoped those who did not come out to speak did not believe they would have no impact. Marj Mackey, Recycling Committee member, observed that many residents chose to stay home rather than come before Council and speak on items, particularly if they are in favor of them. She CC04/28/92 Page 7 noted that people speak out when they are opposed. Betty Sanders, attorney for Wil-Mar, clarified the intent of her letter to Greg Luke. She stated that her comments were accurate and were not misleading. Ms. Sanders indicated that the City had achieved much because of the efforts of the Recycling Committee and argued that mandatory pick-up is necessary in order to keep an accurate accounting of the City' s solid waste. Attempting to address the mayor's question about "6% return", Ms. Sanders replied that she understood the figure to represent the rate of return on the cost of implementing the services. Dennis Bryant, 7410 Sombrillo, commented that Wil-Mar Disposal was a small company and remarked that he did not know many small companies that could afford to pay their attorney to represent them at 3-hour public hearing. This expense, he said, goes right into the cost to the consumer. Mary Jazwecki, 4780 El Camino Real, asked staff if she would have to pay for garbage service at her residence when she currently has three commercial bins. Mr. Luke indicated that she would. Ms. Jazwecki replied that she was then opposed. Ray Jansen, Recycling Committee member, reported that he had become educated during the course of his involvement with the committee and stated that he believed mandatory pick-up to be in the best interest of the City at large. In addition, he noted that although it is impractical, Wil-Mar is currently picking up some items (like newspaper and plastic milk jugs) that there is no market for. The City Clerk relayed comments presented to her on the telephone by Mrs. Lois Rauch of Atascadero. Mr. and Mrs. Rauch as well as two of their neighbors, she reported, were opposed and urged the Council to give consideration to the elderly and those with low- income. Mrs. Rauch also posed a question regarding whether or not property owners would be required to pay for pick-up service when a home was sitting vacant. Mayor Shiers mentioned that he had received a call from ninety-one year old resident, Dick Frank, who is in a wheelchair and is opposed because he would need someone to assist him getting his can to the curb. --End of Public Testimony--- Individual Council comments followed. Councilwoman Borgeson voiced opposition to mandatory pick-up and urged the community to become more involved in recycling. She suggested that the Council adopt a proclamation in support of recycling and in opposition to non- CC04f28f92 Page 8 recyclable products and that this proclamation be sent out to product manufacturers and grocery stores. Mayor Shiers asked the Public Works Director to respond to the question of empty residence. Mr. Luke explained that the ordinance specifically states that all occupied premises shall have refuse service. Councilman Dexter pointed out the on-going occurrence of illegal dumping in the creeks and reported that the City has received numerous complaints from merchants who have had others dump garbage in their commercial dumpsters. He remarked that the trash service was inexpensive and convenient and said he was in favor of mandatory pick-up because it was the only way to meet State mandates. Councilman Nimmo commented that public service carries with it an obligation to take responsible action and indicated he would support the ordinance. Mayor Shiers asked staff how other communities handle special circumstances. Greg Luke advised that, although a number of surveys have been done and there are a variety of rate structures for different needs, staff was not recommending any exemptions from the program. Councilman Lilley voiced confidence in the recommendation of the Recycling Committee and staff. He stated that there were no other practical, rational alternatives to date and emphasized that the Council has the right to release Wil-Mar if they feel it is not providing good service. Mayor Shiers remarked that Wil-Mar's subsidy does encourage recycling and spoke in support of mandatory pick-up. He argued that the garbage service and subscription to cable television were not comparable because illegal dumping is a public health and safety issue. He noted that when others dispose of their garbage inappropriately, it is imposing costs on others. MOTION: By Councilman Nimmo, seconded by Councilman Dexter to waive the reading in full and approve by title only; motion carried unanimously. MOTION: By Councilman Lilley, seconded by Councilman Nimmo to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 243 on first reading. Discussion on the motion: Councilwoman Borgeson stated that mandatory pick-up will not stop illegal dumping completely and stressed that the City needs to educate the public. Mayor Shiers commented that while he believed mandatory pick-up CC04/28/92 Page 9 would reduce solid waste and control illegal dumping, he did not believe it was the only alternative. He mentioned that the Council does have control over Wil-Mar's rates and has the power to audit their books and chose to either grant or deny any requests for rate increases. The City Manager pointed out that the City Council does not have control over the rates at the landfill. Vote on the motion: Motion to adopt on first reading an ordinance implementing mandatory garbage collection carried 4:1 with Councilwoman Borgeson voting in opposition. Mayor Shiers called a break at 10:05 p.m. At 10:20 the meeting resumed. 2. ZONE CHANGE 91-016/TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 91-006,8005 and 8025 AMAPOA - Request for tentative tract map to subdivide two con- tiguous parcels into seven (7) parcels ranging in size from 3,095 to 41810 square feet, along with a zone change request to add a planned development overlay (PD7) to the underlying residential multiple-family zoning of the site (Miller/Mon- tanaro A. Ordinance No. 244 - Amending Map 17 of the official zon- ing maps by rezoning certain real properties at 8005 and 8025 Amapoa Ave. from RMF/10 (FH) to RMF/10 (FH) (PD7) (ZC 91016: Miller/Montanaro) (Recommendation to waive reading in full and approve on first reading, by title only) Henry Engen presented the staff report and recommendation to approve the project based on the Conditions of Approval. He confirmed that the project met the criteria set for in the Planned Development Standards ordinance. Warren Miller, co-applicant, provided background on the project and objected to several conditions of approval (#2, 41 13 & 20(b) ) . He declared that it was unfair for he and his partner to bear the costs of the entire drainage system and debated the need for interior fencing. He mentioned that he was also concerned about language relating to traffic devices and asked that specific requirements be spelled out. Mr. Miller indicated that the most critical concern was Condition #20(b) relating to drainage and passed out to Council a map prepared by Cuesta Engineering to illustrate the area (see Exhibit A) . He voiced opposition to the drainage requirements and asked about the status of the fees already collected in Amapoa-Tecorida drainage area. CC04/28/92 Page 10 Mr. Luke noted that there was approximately $80,000 in the Amapoa- Tecorida fund. He provided history of the drainage problems in the area and explained that the monies were intended for more regional drainage needs. Councilwoman Borgeson asked the Public Works Director if the fees established in 1981 had every been updated. Mr. Luke indicated that they had not. Councilman Nimmo objected to the applicants being conditioned to mitigate the drainage problems of existing and future development in addition to being required to pay into the fund. He exclaimed that it should be one or the other. Mr. Luke reported that the project was a substantial development and advised that logical improvement is required at that location. Councilman Nimmo stated that the criteria ought to be what is fair and equitable and mentioned that other lots, now undeveloped, should pay their fair share. Responding to inquiry from Councilman Dexter, the Public Works Director reported that there was not, in place, a mechanism for recovering from future development the cost for drainage improvements. He added that the Amapoa-Tecorida fees may be out of date and Council could ask staff to re-examine those fees. (By motion, Council resolved to extend the meeting beyond 11:00 p.m. ) David Montanaro, co-applicant, noted Condition #2 relating to the location and orientation of Unit V. He submitted a revised plan (see Exhibit B) which he thought would satisfy both staff and applicants. He asked that the verbiage in the condition be modified to reflect the change, indicating that he would submit full-size plans to the Community Development Department. Mr. Montanaro also addressed the drainage issue and proclaimed that he and Mr. Miller were being taken advantage of. He argued that it was unfair to be expected to pay over $5,000 in drainage fees in addition to being required to install over $15,000 in drainage improvements. Councilwoman Borgeson asked the applicants if they had been aware the property was in a flood zone when it was purchased and if they had paid a lesser price because of it. Mr. Montanaro replied that they had known the land was in the flood zone and had paid full price as comparable with other properties without such problems. He pointed out that they had not considered they would be expected to install a drainage system under the street and this cost had not been factored into the individual lot cost. Council questions of staff and lengthy discussion followed. The Community Development Director indicated concurrence for the CC04/28/92 Page 11 modification offered on Unit V. He also mentioned that the City Council had the power to give the applicants a credit for drainage fees. Councilwoman Borgeson and Mayor Shiers indicated support. Relating to internal fencing, Councilman Lilley suggested that a decision to construct an inside fence be left up to the buyers. Mr. Miller proposed that two or three types of fencing be approved and let the individual property owners make the choice. Mr. Montanaro added that the C.C.&R. 's would spell this out. MOTION: By Mayor Shiers, seconded by Councilman Lilley to waive the reading in full and approve by title only; motion unanimously carried. MOTION: By Mayor Shiers, seconded by Councilman Lilley to approve Ordinance No. 244 on first reading with Conditions of Approval as modified and with the understanding that Amapoa-Tecorida drainage area fees will be waived; motion carried 5:0. (Note: Conditions modified were #1, 2, 20(b) and 24) . D. REGULAR BUSINESS: 1. ATASCADERO LAKE PARR PAVILION - EQUIPMENT UPDATE Andy Takata provided the staff report and recommendation to approve certain purchases to be paid for out of the General Fund Reserves. There were no questions or additional comments from the Council or the public. MOTION: By Councilman Nimmo, seconded by Councilwoman Borgeson to direct staff to pursue the purchase of remaining furniture and equipment needed to complete the Atascadero Lake Park Pavilion project; motion carried 5:0 by roll call vote. 2. ORDINANCE NO. 242 - ADDING CHAPTER 9 TO TITLE 5 OF THE ATASCA- DERO MUNICIPAL CODE, ADOPTING SURFACE MINING AND RECLAMATION PLAN REGULATIONS (Recommendation to waive reading in full and approve on second reading, by title only) Mayor Shiers mentioned that this matter was back for second reading and adoption. There were no comments from the Council. CC04/28/92 Page 12 Public Comment: John Flaherty, 11900 Cenegal Road, indicated that he had been involved in the issues for over a year and was supportive of the ordinance. He stated that although he did not wish to delay the matter he did have some proposed changes and outlined them. Brief discussion followed. The City Attorney reported that he had not heard of the changes suggested by Mr. Flaherty until now and advised that Council adopt the ordinance as written. He added that the ordinance could be amended at a later date. Mr. Engen pointed out that the ordinance had been modeled after the State's and that the State had already given approval to the ordinance as introduced. The City Manager proposed, to avoid delay, that Council adopt the ordinance and direct staff to meet with Mr. Flaherty to discuss suggested changes and determine further action. MOTION: By Councilman Lilley seconded by Councilwoman Borgeson to adopt Ordinance 242 by title only; motion carried 5:0 by roll call vote. E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION ANDIOR ACTION: 1. City Council: A. Public Smoking Issue - Clarification of Direction Councilman Dexter reported that he had conducted an informal survey and had changed his position on a smoking ban. Referring to his memo dated 4/6/92, he highlighted suggestions for efforts to educate the youth about the harmful effects of smoking and proposed that staff be directed to develop an ordinance banning cigarette machines. He also proposed that a coalition for a smoke-free environment be formed and suggested membership could comprise of a member of the City Council, representatives from the County Health Department, Chamber of Commerce, school district, Police Department and members of the public-at-large. Brief discussion ensued. Councilwoman Borgeson criticized Councilman Dexter for changing his mind on the matter and for putting the staff and public to so much trouble. The mayor, Councilman Lilley and Councilman Nimmo indicated that they could support the suggested made by Councilman Dexter. By consensus, Council directed staff to draft an ordinance banning cigarette machines. CC04/28/92 Page 13 2. City Treasurer Micki Korba remarked that she served as a member on the City's Economic Round Table and wanted to state for the record that she had absolute faith in the integrity of each member. She commented that all are dedicated individuals who are giving their time and abilities. In addition, the City Treasurer reported on the City's investment with the Orange County Investment Pool and stated that Orange County is no longer allowing cities outside of the county to participate. Ms. Korba also reported that she had recently attended the Annual State Municipal Treasurer's Conference and had learned much valuable information. She asked Council, while deliberating about next year' s budget, to consider the importance of continuing support for educational seminars and workshops for the City Clerk and the City Treasurer. She noted that if knowledge is limited and contacts are eliminated, it could be costly to the City. S. City Manager Mr. Windsor asked Council to set a closed session for 6: 15 p.m. on Tuesday, May 12, 1992 for the purpose of discussions relating to pending litigation and personnel matters. By unanimous consensus, Council agreed to meet in closed session as recommended. MOTION: By Councilman Lilley, seconded by Councilman Dexter to adjourn the meeting; motion passed. THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 12:30 P.M. TO A CLOSED SESSION ON TUESDAY, MAY 12, 1992 AT 6:15 P.M. MINUTES RECORDED AND PREPARED BY: LEE RABO N City Clerk Attachments: Exhibit A (Map - Miller/Montanaro) Exhibit B (Site Plan - Miller/Montanaro) CCo4/28/92 Page 14 x ` •., . Shy .4 a.•aJ w ;,fi �'' y • •,Vr,N*.' .\•> •! - =2,0` ar • � ' EXHIBIT A i s YO •� l , " fi(/:• ...` - r *�-i-ter r . . ':a+ .�" � /�j t OL1' IT j ' #C 9 • . ,-/' _ c • \ � ms's 71 .fit 11 t i 1 ��~'. : '` K g�5i � T' i� :\i� .• •��•�•' .� (} • t ` i f/'f•. / - '...-��r� � rye`' • ' +C.•"' AIJ 4yff � •� oa 1 + .� •..111..---... •�- . y �V�•• '�•,,'� :.! ` 9!!!!!! �• •�1` i • ►..,• 'i� � may` !/,. ; / • F �'11�-�6 , // � • .rrrs, z Az 41t— .: •_ ,:`� ' �,� r'yVY J'y[y�` _ 'max' �X'[Y,F� `J �'/ .. ` ` ✓``r �` � =i/A .- ° ` a ."a 1.. ��i...\ •.WR' i ! i.� •.. AIS Ir ` . J-- .,. , / _. � � .. �'. • .� •,-•• dpi • /01 v \ V • "�* /CSLL • y '2 • • \ A •�' e��•ti 41 OV 34 W N k ' _ lbl 101 RQA /� • 1, � j `• `�.. `t\ �. � ...�.....�—� •Y_ ��.:� `�.� +� ♦. 'd CC4/28/92 < < EXHIBIT B a J� Y d jS�a� Jae` V .s. s I � •u! 140 40. . u . .In J n � 6 ,�� ( Y ��z,• J Q •�oaf � ' j c z Ali O W ! r g t cr rota Ij s tr t J{ y J � c r/Yl'�r 4 t