Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Resolution 2014-0020 CITY OF ATASCADERO PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION #2014-0008 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 805/461-5035 Findings: 1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment. 2. The project will not achieve short-term goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals and policies. 3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. 4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. Determination: Based on the above findings, and the information contained in the Initial Study 2014-0006 (made a part hereof by reference and on file in the Community Development Department), it has been determined that the above project will not have an adverse impact on the environment. Prepared By: Callie Taylor, Senior Planner Emilie Morse, Planning Intern Date Posted: September 18, 2014 Public Review Ends: October 7, 2014 Attachments: - Location/ Zoning Map - General Plan Designation Map - Aerial Map - Conceptual Site Plan (not currently proposed for construction) - Site Photographs - Scenic Highway Map - Initial Study 2014-0008 Applicant/Owner: County of San Luis Obispo, General Services, 1087 Santa Rosa St., San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 Project Title: PLN 2014-1506 – Former Atascadero Library Site General Plan Amendment 2014-0029 / Zone Change 2014-0174 / Lot Merger 2014-0013 Project Location: 6850 Morro Road, Atascadero, CA 93422 (APN 030-282-033 & 027) 6925 & 6907 Atascadero Ave., Atascadero, CA 93422 (APN 030-282-018 & 032) Project Description: The project consists of a General Plan Amendment (GPA) and Zoning Map Amendment (ZCH) to change the land use designations on parcels previously used as the Atascadero library. Due to the recent relocation of the library to 6555 Capistrano Avenue, the County of San Luis Obispo has submitted an application to redesignate the four (4) existing parcels of the previous library site from a combination of Residential and Public general plan classifications to a combination of Residential and Commercial in order to facilitate the sale of the property. Under the proposed Commercial Retail (CR) zoning, the existing 8221 sq. ft. library building could be repurposed by future owners for commercial purposes, consistent with surrounding commercial uses on Morro Road. A lot merger is proposed in order to combine the two (2) underlying parcels of the library building into one commercial lot. The proposed Residential Multi-Family-20 (RMF-20) zoning of the parcels at 6925 and 6907 Atascadero Avenue would facilitate future residential development consistent with adjacent uses to the north and west. A concept site plan has been provided by the County of San Luis Obispo to demonstrate possible future residential use and parking; however, no development is currently proposed at this time. Existing General Plan Designation: General Commercial, Public Facilities, High -Density Residential Existing Zoning: Commercial Professional/PD-3, Public Facilities, Residential Multi-Family-20 Proposed General Plan Designation: General Commercial, High-Density Residential Proposed Zoning: Commercial Retail, Residential Multi-Family-20 CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 GPA library ISND Final.em ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Environmental Review 2014-0008 Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422 Contact Person and Phone Number: Callie Taylor, Senior Planner City of Atascadero, Phone: (805) 470-3448 General Plan Designation: General Commercial, Public Facilities, High-Density Residential Zoning: Commercial Professional/PD-3, Public Facilities, Residential Multi-Family-20 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting East: General Commercial North: General Commercial & High Density Residential South: General Commercial West: High Density Residential Other public agencies whose approval is required None Applicant/Owner: County of San Luis Obispo, General Services, 1087 Santa Rosa St., San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 Project Title: PLN 2014-1506 – Former Atascadero Library Site General Plan Amendment 2014-0029 / Zone Change 2014-0174 / Lot Merger 2014-0013 Project Location: 6850 Morro Road, Atascadero, CA 93422 (APN 030-282-033 & 027) 6925 & 6907 Atascadero Ave., Atascadero, CA 93422 (APN 030 -282-018 & 032) Project Description: The project consists of a General Plan Amendment (GPA) and Zoning Map Amendment (ZCH) to change the land use designations on parcels previously used as the Atascadero library. Due to the recent relocation of the library to 6555 Capistrano Avenue, the County of San Luis Obispo has submitted an application to redesignate the four (4) existing parcels of the previous library site from a combination of Residential and Public general plan classifications to a combination of Residential and Commercial in order to facilitate the sale of the property. Under the proposed Commercial Retail (CR) zoning, the existing 8221 sq. ft. library building could be repurposed by future owners for commercial purposes, consistent with surrounding commercial uses on Morro Road. A lot merger is proposed in order to combine the two (2) underlying parcels of the library building into one commercial lot. The proposed Residential Multi-Family-20 (RMF-20) zoning of the parcels at 6925 and 6907 Atascadero Avenue would facilitate future residential development consistent with adjacent uses to the north and west. A concept site plan has been provided by the County of San Luis Obispo to demonstrate possible future residential use and parking; however, no development is currently proposed at this time. Existing General Plan Designation: General Commercial, Public Facilities, High-Density Residential Existing Zoning: Commercial Professional/PD-3, Public Facilities, Residential Multi-Family-20 Proposed General Plan Designation: General Commercial, High -Density Residential Proposed Zoning: Commercial Retail, Residential Multi-Family-20 CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 GPA library ISND Final.em Attachment 1 Location / Zoning Map APN 030-282-018 & 030-282-032 Existing Zoning: Residential Multi- Family (RMF-20) & Public Facilities (P) Proposed Zoning: Residential Multiple Family (RMF-20) APN 030-282-033 & 030-282-027 Existing Zoning: Public Facilities (P) & Commercial Professional (CP) Proposed Zoning: Commercial Retail (CR) CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 GPA library ISND Final.em Attachment 2 General Plan Designation Map APN 030-282-033 & 030-282-027 Existing General Plan Designation: Public Facilities (P) & General Commercial (GC) Proposed General Plan Designation: General Commercial (GC) APN 030-282-018 & 030-282-032 Existing General Plan Designation: High Density Residential (HDR) & Public Facilities (P) Proposed General Plan Designation: High Density Residential (HDR) CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 GPA library ISND Final.em Attachment 3 Aerial View Subject Sites: 6805 Morro Road 6925 Atascadero Ave 6907 Atascadero Ave Lot merger of APN 030-282-033 & 030-282-027 Existing library building is constructed across the property line. Proposal to consolidate 2 existing lots into one commercial parcel. CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 GPA library ISND Final.em Attachment 4 Proposed Conceptual Site Plan Reuse of existing library building for commercial space, with associated parking lot Future residential units with parking along Atascadero Ave. Atascadero Ave. Morro Rd. CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 GPA library ISND Final.em Attachment 5 Site Photographs Front of existing library building, view from parking lot Vacant Residential Building On -Site at 6925 Atascadero Ave CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 GPA library ISND Final.em Morro Road frontage Existing Parking Lot On-Site CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 GPA library ISND Final.em Attachment 6 Caltrans Scenic Highway Map Project Site: 6850 Morro Rd and 6907 / 6925 Atascadero Ave CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 GPA library ISND Final.em ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture and Forest Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology /Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology / Water Quality Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population / Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Utilities / Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environmen t, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant effect” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Callie Taylor 9-18-2014 Callie Taylor, Senior Planner Date CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 GPA library ISND Final.em EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, and then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an ef fect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from "Earlier Analyses," as described in (5) below, may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier E IR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effe cts from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance . CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 Page 11 GPA library ISND Final.em Initial Study 2014-0008 PLN 2014-1506 – Former Atascadero Library Site Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 1. AESTHETICS -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? SOURCES: Project Description, Conceptual Site Plan, California Department of Transportation DISCUSSION: 1.a. The proposed rezoning and lot merger will not obscure a designated scenic vista. A scenic vista is described as a “viewpoint that provides expansive views of a highly valued landscape for the benefit o f the general public” (CEQA Guidelines). The property is to be reclassified and rezoned consistent with surrounding High Density Residential and General Commercial properties. No development is currently proposed for the project site with the subject app lication. 1.b. The proposed rezoning will not substantially damage scenic resources. The project site is near Highway 41 which is an eligible state scenic highway but is not officially designated as one (Caltrans Scenic Highway Program). The site does not contain any historic structures and will not disturb any rock outcroppings. 1.c. The proposed project is within the character of the surrounding area. The former library building will remain on the property to be converted into usable office or commercial retail space. At a future date under separate application, the existing vacant home on the Atascadero Avenue site may be replaced with multi-family housing. The property currently is boarded by other multifamily residences and commercial b uildings. Reference Attachment 3 for the most current aerial of project site. 1.d. New multi-family residences at this location are not expected to generate substantial light or glare. No additional lighting is proposed for the commercial building on site. Any future lighting at this site to be designed to eliminate off site glare, consistent with existing City ordinances. Mitigation Measure: No applicable mitigation measures 2. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST RESOURCES -- In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and the forest carbon measurement methodology provided in the Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 Page 12 GPA library ISND Final.em Initial Study 2014-0008 PLN 2014-1506 – Former Atascadero Library Site Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))?? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? SOURCES: Site Plan, Department of Conservation, Atascadero General Plan DISCUSSION 2.a. The property is not shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency as prime farmland. 2.b. The property is not in an agricultural zone and is not under a Williamson Act contract. 2.c. The project does not involve rezoning of forest land or timberland. 2.d.e. The project will not result in a loss of forest land and wil l not result in a conversion of forest land to non -forest use or farmland to non-agricultural uses. Mitigation Measure: No applicable mitigation measures 3. AIR QUALITY -- Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? SOURCES: Air Pollution Control District (APCD) CEQA Air Quality Handbook, 2012; Project Description, Conceptual Site Plan DISCUSSION: 3. a.c.) The proposed project consists of rezoning and general plan redesignation for consistency with surrounding residential and commercial uses. No new development is proposed on the commercial l parcel. A concept plan has been provided for the residential parcels, which identifies a possible four (4) new residential units located on a previously graded, relatively flat infill development site totaling less than one acre in size. According to the Operational Screening Criteria for Project Air Quality Analysis (SLOAPCD, 2012), residential housing development of this size will not exceed the particular matter or APCD Daily Ozone Precursor Significance Threshold of 25 lbs ROG+NOx/Day from CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 Page 13 GPA library ISND Final.em Initial Study 2014-0008 PLN 2014-1506 – Former Atascadero Library Site Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Operational Impacts. Therefore, air quality impacts resulting from four future new residential units are considered to be less than significant and mitigation measures are not requi red. 3.b.) Construction activities, including demolition and site grading, have the potential to produce small quantitie s of air pollution that include dust and equipment exhaust. Air quality impacts from construction would be temporary and short term. No construction is proposed on the project site at this time. At the time of future development, any proposed demolition or new residential units shall be conditioned to comply with all applicable APCD regulations in place at the time of future project proposal, including any conditions pertaining to the control of fugitive dust (PM-10) as showed in Section 2 “Assessing and Mitigating Construction Impacts” of the April 2012 CEQA Air Quality Handbook. 3.d.e) No construction is proposed on the subject site at this time. The rezoning and lot merger shall not expose sensitive receptors to concentrate pollutants or create objectionable odors. Mitigation Measure: No applicable mitigation measures 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife specie s or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservati on Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? SOURCES: Atascadero Native Tree Regulations; General Plan 2025; Conceptual Site Plan, Site Visit, The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory. DISCUSSION: 4.a.b.c. No sensitive species have been found directly on the site. There is no riparian habitat and no wetland habitat within the project site. According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory the nearest CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 Page 14 GPA library ISND Final.em Initial Study 2014-0008 PLN 2014-1506 – Former Atascadero Library Site Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact wetland and riparian habitats to this site are approximately 0.2 miles away. 4.d. The site is located within the City’s urban core and is surrounded by Commercial Professional, Commercial Retail, Residential Multi-Family-20 zones. The Land Use Element EIR concludes that development within the City limits will not have a significant impact on wildlife or wildlife corridors. 4.e. There are currently no trees proposed for removal. Any future tree impacts or removals associated with future development shall be mitigated according to the Atascadero Native Tree Ordinance. 4.f. The site is not located in an area that will conflict with an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Mitigation Measure: No applicable mitigation measures 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in '15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to '15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? _____________________________________________________________________________________________ SOURCES: Project description; Site Plan, CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060 to 15065, Atascadero City GIS Data, Site Visit DISCUSSION: 5.a. There are no known historic resources located on or adjacent to the site based on GIS data collected by the City of Atascadero. No development is proposed at this time that would include earthwork or have an affect archaeological resources. 5.b. There are no known archaeological resources located on or adjacent to the project site based on City GIS data that identifies area of archaeological significance. 5.c. Paleontological resources or unique geologic features are not known to be located on the project site based on City GIS data. 5.d. No known human remains have been found or documented in the vicinity of the project. Mitigation Measure: No applicable mitigation measures 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 Page 15 GPA library ISND Final.em Initial Study 2014-0008 PLN 2014-1506 – Former Atascadero Library Site Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? SOURCES: Project description; Site Plan, City of Atascadero GIS Data DISCUSSION: 6.a. Atascadero lies about 30 miles west of the San Andreas Fault zone and 19 miles east of the San Simeon -Hosgri Fault. Small to moderate earthquakes are common in San Luis Obispo County. The property contains no unusual geological formations. The City of Atascadero GIS Data shows that the project is not located on any known earthquake faults and has a low landslide risk. 6.b. Any future construction activities on the site will be required to comply with sedimentation and erosion control measures prescribed by the Project Engineer and consistent with state regulations. 6.c.d.e. Soil conditions will be reviewed during building permit review for any future project development in accordance with the municipal code. A soils report is required for submittal with a future building pe rmit by the development. The building plans will be required to following the recommendations of the soil report to assure safety of the buildings. Mitigation Measure: No applicable mitigation measures 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS -- Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? SOURCES: Project description, Site Plan, San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (APCD) CEQA Air Quality Handbook, 2012; Atascadero 2014 Climate Action Plan, General Plan 2025, 2004 DISCUSSION: 7.a.b. The proposed project consists of rezoning and General Plan redesignation at this time. This rezoning will enable future residential development. A concept plan has been submitted which identifies a possible four (4) 1,000 CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 Page 16 GPA library ISND Final.em Initial Study 2014-0008 PLN 2014-1506 – Former Atascadero Library Site Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact sq. ft. new residential multi-family units and the repurposing of an existing 8,000 sq . ft. building for commercial use. The project is located on a relatively flat development site totaling about one acre in size. According to the Operational Screening Criteria for Project Air Quality Analysis (SLOAPCD, 2012), a commercial and multi -residential development of this size is not expected to exceed the APCD Annual GHG Bright Line Threshold (3) of 1150 MT CO2e/year from Operational & Amortized Construction Impacts. The Bright -Line numeric threshold of 1,150 MT CO2e/year represents an emissions level below which a project’s contribution to global clima te change would be deemed less than “cumulatively considerable.” Therefore, greenhouse gas emissions resulting from future 4 new residential units and existing commercial structure are considered to be less than significant and mitigation measures are not required. The proposed project is consistent with City and regional plans, policies, and regulations, regarding reduction of emissions of greenhouse gases. The proposed project is consistent with the goals and GHG reduction measures identified in the Atascadero 2014 Climate Action Plan. Mitigation Measure: No applicable mitigation measures 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -- Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or di sposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan area or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people living or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people living or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? SOURCES: Project description; General Plan Land Use Element, Department of Toxic Substances Control: EnviroStor. GIS DISCUSSION CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 Page 17 GPA library ISND Final.em Initial Study 2014-0008 PLN 2014-1506 – Former Atascadero Library Site Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 8a.b.c. The future residential development and existing commercial building do not generate or involve use of significant amounts of hazardous materials. There are no known hazardous materials on the site or nearby according to Department of Toxic Substances Control: EnviroStor. 8.d. The property is not a listed hazardous material site based on the EnviroStor map. 8.e.f. There are no airports within Atascadero, nor are there airport land use p lans that affect the City. 8.g.h. Although GIS determines the site has a medium fire severity level, the site is within the Fire Department’s five minute or less response area. During building permit review, the fire department will verify appropriate fi re hydrant locations and will determine if new buildings or building additions or reuse of existing building for new uses will require fire sprinklers. Mitigation Measure: No applicable mitigation measures 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -- Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of previously-existing nearby wells would drop to a level that would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 Page 18 GPA library ISND Final.em Initial Study 2014-0008 PLN 2014-1506 – Former Atascadero Library Site Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact ____________________________________________________________________________________________ SOURCES: Project description, GIS, FEMA Flood Map, Site Plan, Resolution No. R3-2013-0032 Central Coast Water Control Board, California Department of Conservation DISCUSSION: 9a. Future construction on the multifamily parcels shall be in conf ormance with all water quality standards. 9b. The proposed rezoning and future development will not deplete ground water supplies. Water will be provided by Atascadero Mutual Water Company. 9c.d.f. Future construction activities are subject to review for compliance with City drainage and grading regulations. Drainage will not be permitted to create or intensify any hazards for persons or property in the vicinity. 9e. The Central Coast Water Quality Control Board requires reducing pollutant discharges to the Maximum Extent Practicable and preventing storm water discharges from causing or contributing to a violation of receiving water quality standards in all applicable development projects that require approvals and/or permits issued under the Permittee’s planning, building, or other comparable authority. 9.g.h.i. The proposed development will be outside of the 100 -year flood hazard area. 9.j. The project area is not subject to inundation by a tsunami, according to the California Department of Conservation. Mitigation Measure: No applicable mitigation measures 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? SOURCES: Land Use Element; project description; Lot Line Adjustment Map, Atascadero Municipal Code DISCUSSION: 10.a. The project will not physically divide an established community. The subject site is existing commer cial and future infill residential. 10.b. The proposed General Plan Amendment and zoning map change are being proposed in order to enable future use of the site in a manner consistent with surrounding uses. Due to the library’s former location on the s ubject site, the parcels were spot zoned for Public Facilities. Now that the County library is no longer operating on the subject sites, the redesignation will facilitate the sale and reuse of the existing building, and provide for future infill development of residential on Atascadero Avenue. The proposed zoning and future uses will be consistent with adjacent residential and commercial uses. 10.c. The project is consistent with the open space and conservation policies identified in the General Plan. Mitigation Measure: No applicable mitigation measures 11. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 Page 19 GPA library ISND Final.em Initial Study 2014-0008 PLN 2014-1506 – Former Atascadero Library Site Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? SOURCES: Project description; Planning staff site visit. DISCUSSION: 11.a.b. No mining is proposed as a part of this project. No known mineral resources have been identified in the area. Mitigation Measure: No applicable mitigation measures 12. NOISE -- Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground-borne vibration or ground-borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan o r, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people living or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? SOURCES: Project description; Noise Element; Noise Ordinance; Acoustical Design Manual. DISCUSSION: 12a.b.c.d. Future development of the residential multi-family lot is expected to involve some construction equipment and use of impact tools that make noise. Noise levels on the site are thus expected to be raised temporarily. The future residential units and the commercial use of the existing building on site is not expected to generate unacceptable levels of noise. Any electrical or mechanical equipment used for construction of the proposed project is required to comply with the Atascadero Noise Ordinance, Chapter 14 in the Atascadero Municipal Code. Any permanent change in ambient noise levels that might be created by equipment or equipment shelter mec hanical features will be required to be designed to be consistent with the Noise Ordinance. 12.e.f. The project is not located within an airport land use plan or private airstrip. Mitigation Measure: No applicable mitigation measures 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING -- Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 Page 20 GPA library ISND Final.em Initial Study 2014-0008 PLN 2014-1506 – Former Atascadero Library Site Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? _____________________________________________________________________________________________ SOURCES: Project description; General Plan Land Use Element , FEIR. DISCUSSION: 13.a. This project proposes to redesignate the four existing parcels used by the previous library from a combination of Residential and Public general plan classifications to a combination of Residential and Commercial general plan classifications. These classifications are consistent with surrounding uses. This project is less than an acre in size . A concept plan has been provided which identifies a possible four multi-family residential units that could be constructed in the future under the new zoning. These units will not induce direct or indirect substantial population growth in the City of Atascadero. 13.b.c. No housing or persons will be displaced. All buildings on site are currently vacant. Mitigation Measure: No applicable mitigation measures 14. PUBLIC SERVICES -- Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? SOURCES: Project description; Land Use Element EIR. DISCUSSION: Development Impact Fees: Development Impact Fees will be required of any new project for which a building permit is issued. The concept of the impact fee program is to fund an d sustain improvements which are needed as a result of new development as stated in the General Plan and other policy documents within the fee program. Development Impact Fees fall into the following categories: Drainage Fees; Streets, Road, Bridge Fees; Sewer Fees; Public Safety Fees; and Park Fees, Miscellaneous Fees. In addition, school fees are collected by the Atascadero Unified School District. The amount of impact fees to be paid will be determined at the time of issuance of building permit. Fire and Police: Impact fees are charged for new development, to help pay the cost of providing new facilities to serve the expanding city. The Fire Department of the City of Atascadero has indicated that it will be able to adequately service the proposed project. The future applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Fire Department. The City CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 Page 21 GPA library ISND Final.em Initial Study 2014-0008 PLN 2014-1506 – Former Atascadero Library Site Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact of Atascadero Police Department has also indicated that the proposed project poses no problems to the police to adequately service it. Schools: At build out of the General Plan, the city’s population will overburden the existing school system unless additional classroom space is added. The Atascadero Unified School District charges impact fees to fund additional schools as needed. State law restricts mitigation of school impacts to the levying of these fees and other measures adopted by the school district. Provision of adequate facilities for the population is the responsibility of the school district. Development impact will be assessed by the school district, and collected at the time of building permit issuance for each residential unit. Parks: Project Description (rezoning and future new residences) will / will not increase demand on existing City parks and recreation facilities. The City’s Parks & Recreation Commission is committed to finding ways to continue to provide parks and other recreational opportunities to city residents as the city expands, thereby addressing cumulative impacts. Other public facilities: The future construction of four new residential units and the reuse of the existing vacant library building are not expected to have significant impacts on any other public facilities. Mitigation Measure: No applicable mitigation measures 15. RECREATION -- a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?     b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? SOURCES: Project description; Parks and Recreation Element. DISCUSSION: 15.a. Residents are expected to use existing parks and recreational facilities, but the numbers are not expected to result in substantial physical deterioration of an y facilities. Development impact fees will be collected to bring this impact to less than significant levels. 15.b. The project does not involve construction of recreational facilities. Mitigation Measure: No applicable mitigation measures 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -- Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 Page 22 GPA library ISND Final.em Initial Study 2014-0008 PLN 2014-1506 – Former Atascadero Library Site Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? SOURCES: Land Use Element; Circulation Element; Project Description; ITE Trip Generation Rates (8th edition), Atascadero Fire Department, City of Atascadero Engineering Standards DISCUSSION: 16a.b. The Circulation Element in the Atascadero General Plan identifies policies and programs to address cumulative trips in Atascadero. The project is consistent with polices and mitigations discussed in the Circulation Element. 16.c. No changes will occur to air traffic patterns. 16.d. The proposed project will not substantially increase hazards due to a design feature. 16.e. The proposed project will have adequate emergency through appropriate mitigations. The site is within the Fire Department’s five minute or less response area. 16.f. The proposed project will not affect the circulation in the area. The rezoning is consistent with surrounding uses and will have no significant impact of the performance of circulation in the area. Mitigation Measure: No applicable mitigation measures 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS --Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 Page 23 GPA library ISND Final.em Initial Study 2014-0008 PLN 2014-1506 – Former Atascadero Library Site Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted c apacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? SOURCES: Project description; Land Use Element; Hydrology and Water Quality Element DISCUSSION: Water: The Atascadero Mutual Water Company (AMWC) will provide water. All property within the City l imits is entitled to water from the AMWC. The project is not expected to require a significant quantity of water for the proposed use. Water is pumped from the Atascadero sub-basin portion of the Paso Robles Formation, using a series of shallow and deep wells. The water company anticipates that it will be able to meet the city’s needs through build out and beyond: Water demand at build out is estimated to be at 16,000-20,000 acre-feet per year (AFY). The City is projected to have enough water to meet the demand with the approval of the Nacimiento Water Project which has allocated the City an additional 3,000 AFY with a flow rate of 3.48 million gallons per day (mgd). Sewer: Sewer discharge will be handled by an on City sewer connection. The Hydrology and Water Quality Element confirms that the average daily flow of the projected housing need (RHNA) is well within the capacity of the upgraded wastewater treatment system as part of the General Plan Housing Element. Storm Water. On-site storm water drainage for future development will be managed according to City regulations. 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE -- a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?  d) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long term environmental goals? CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 09/19/14 Page 24 GPA library ISND Final.em DISCUSSION: This project site is currently vacant due to the recent relocation of the Atascadero library to 6555 Capistrano Avenue. The four (4) parcels on site are to be redesignated and rezoned to Commercial Retail and Multi- Family Residential in order to facilitate in the sale of this propert y. The future development may include four (4) multifamily units and reconfigure the existing parking lot. All of these changes are consistent with surrounding uses and the Atascadero General Plan and Zoning Ordinance provisions. The proposed project has been analyzed as required by CEQA and the Atascadero Municipal Code. Project -related impacts have been identified as less than significant, and a Negative Declaration has been prepared . SOURCES: California Department of Transportation The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory General Plan 2025, City of Atascadero, 2004 California Department of Conservation Zoning Ordinance, part of Municipal Code, City of Atascadero, as amended CEQA Air Quality Handbook, Air Pollution Control District San Luis Obispo County, April 2012 Acoustical Design Manual, Brown-Buntin Associates, 1991 Flood Insurance Map FEMA Flood Map 08-09-1704V-060700, Site Plan Resolution No. R3-2013-0032 Central Coast Water Control Board CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15060 to 15065 City of Atascadero, GIS Data Atascadero Tree Ordinance Atascadero Fire Department City of Atascadero Engineering Standards California Department of Toxic Substances Control: Envirostor PROJECT SOURCES: Project Description Conceptual Site Plan Site Visit