Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 111390MINUTES NOVEMBER 13, 1990 Mayor Lilley called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Shiers. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Shiers, Nimmo, Dexter, Borgeson and Mayor Lilley Also Present: Muriel Korba, City Treasurer and Lee Dayka, City Clerk Staff Present: Ray Windsor, City Manager; Art Montandon, City Attorney; Mark Joseph, Administrative Services Director; Henry Engen, Community Development Director; Mike Hicks, Fire Chief; and Bud McHale, Police Chief "JZ19"1N I1n[iiL=1Z1t;r Councilman Dexter announced that he had just become a "great- grandfather". Councilwoman Borgeson noted that she had received a letter- from Golden State Developers regarding the possible acquisition of Stadium Park and asked whether the opportunity to purchase had passed. Henry Engen responded that the developers were attempting to determine what types of uses would be acceptable to the City. He reported that he had advised them that they could apply for a General Plan Amendment for an alternate use or wait until adoption of the Parks & Recreation Element. The City Manager indicated that it is not too late to seek acquisition and the mayor directed staff to schedule the matter as an agenda item to explore the options and determine further Council direction. PROCLAMATION= Mayor Lilley read the proclamation for MADW S "Project Red Ribbon", November 20, 1990 - January 1, 1991 and presented it to Marigrace Waage. On behalf of Mothers Against Drunk Driving, Ms. CC11/13/90 Page 1 Waage presented caps to the mayor and city manager. Additionally, she announced that the kick-off ceremony of Project Red Ribbon would be held November 20, 1990 at 8:30 a.m. at the Police Facility and extended an invitation to all. COMMUNITY FORUM: Sarah Gronstrand, 7620 Del Rio Road, urged that serious consideration be given to the drought situation and suggested the forming of a Council subcommittee to develop an educational water conservation program. A. CONSENT CALENDAR: Mayor Lilley read the Consent Calendar, as follows: 1. OCTOBER 9, 1990 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 2. OCTOBER 309 1990 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 3. CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - SEPTEMBER 1990 4. FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT - SEPTEMBER 1990 5. UPDATE ON EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE 6. RESOLUTION NO. 121-90 - AUTHORIZING TEST USE AGREEMENT WITH COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL SERVICES 7. ADOPT WORKERS' COMPENSATION POLICY FOR VOLUNTEERS 8. AUTHORIZE DONATION TO THE CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION CORPS 9. AUTHORIZE FACSIMILE SIGNATURES FOR PAYROLL CHECKS 10. APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDERS FOR THE POLICE FACILITY 11. AWARD OF BID #90-16 FOR INTERDEPARTMENTAL PERMIT TRACKING SYSTEM 12. AWARD OF BID #90-14 FOR REPLACEMENT OF FIRE DEPARTMENT RESCUE -1 MINI -PUMPER 13. ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL TRACT MAP 1382, VISTA ROAD - Finalization of Phase II, Tract Map 820802:1 (Panorama Oaks II - Ibsen/ Gill/Stewart) 14. AUTHORIZATION TO REFUND AMAPOA-TECORIDA FEES: CC11/13/90 Page 2 0 A. IN EXCHANGE FOR A 20' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT ACROSS THE THREE PROPERTIES as 72200 7300 & 7340 ATASCADERO AVENUE (Gardner/G.W. Land Co.) B. IN EXCHANGE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF REGIONAL DRAINAGE FACILITIES - BETTER HOMES & GARDENS BUILDING, MORRO RD. & ATASCADERO AVE. (West/Bewsey-West Construction) Councilman Shiers asked that item A-12 be pulled for further discussion. Councilwoman Borgeson requested that item A-10 also be removed from the Consent Calendar. MOTION: By Councilman Dexter and seconded by Councilman Nimmo to approval items A-1 through A-9, A-11, A-13 and A - 14(a) & (b); motion carried 5:0. 10. APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDERS FOR THE POLICE FACILITY Mark Joseph gave a brief staff report on the change orders clarifying that Council was being asked to approve two change orders representing just over 5% of the contract and confirmed that these changes were deviations from the contract. Councilwoman Borgeson asked the Police Chief whether or not there had been a 5% contingency written into the contract. Chief McHale replied that, although he did not believe that the contract reflected the contingency, he had anticipated that there would be some changes. He reported that the architect had advised that contingencies may range from 3 - 10% of the contract price and indicated that he was pleased that it was held to 5.1% for a project of this magnitude. At the mayor's request, Chief McHale summarized the changes that were in excess of $1,000. He explained that most of the changes were because of State Board of Corrections requirements and fire regulations. Other major changes, he added, included ceiling vents and the necessity to re -pin the stone veneer on the outside building front for seismic safety. Councilwoman Borgeson expressed concern for a number of specific charges and stated that she believed some of these items should have been planned for by the architect. Mayor Lilley inquired if there was a consensus to continue the matter for a public hearing with the architect present to address the issues, or to approve the change orders. CC11/13/90 Page 3 • Councilwoman Borgeson stated tha to determine if there had been Joseph reported that staff had overall budget for the project; contract. n U t she wanted to see the contract a 5% contingency built in. Mark added an additional 5% to the but stated it was not part of the Councilman Dexter indicated that a contingency of this size was not uncommon and spoke in favor of approving the change orders. Councilman Shiers remarked that he would like further information on a couple of items. Councilman Nimmo commented that while he did have a couple of minor questions, they were not significant enough to delay approval of the change orders. Councilwoman Borgeson suggested that, rather than hold a public hearing, staff be directed to prepare a report for the next meeting that would address some of the Council's specific concerns. The mayor asked the City Manager if, assuming it would fit into the schedules of the architect and contractor, the matter could be placed on the next agenda. Mr. Windsor indicated that it could. MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson and seconded by Councilman Shiers to continue the matter until the next regularly scheduled meeting coupled with an invitation to the architect and general contractor to attend and respond to concerns of the Council regarding the change orders; motion unanimously passed by roll call vote. 12. AWARD OF BID #90-14 FOR REPLACEMENT OF FIRE DEPARTMENT RESCUE -1 MINI—PUMPER Councilman Shiers pointed out that staff had not recommended the lowest bidder and asked the Fire Chief if the vendor could, in fact, meet the specifications. Brief discussion followed. Chief Hicks explained that Central States Fire could not meet bid specifications of delivery within 120 days. MOTION: by Councilman Shiers and seconded by Councilwoman Borgeson to follow staff recommendation and award the bid to Fire -Bann Corporation for $90,698.00 plus tax; motion carried 5:0 by roll call vote. CC11/13/90 Page 4 B. HEARINGS/APPEARANCES: 1. CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHMENT OF MANDATORY SOLID WASTE PICK—UP AND CURBSIDE RECYCLING THROUGHOUT THE CITY Mayor Lilley introduced the item and explained that the State had imposed upon local governments Assembly Bill 939 (AB939) mandating local governments to establish a solid waste management plan subject to the approval of State legislature. He reported that the plan must include provisions for each city to reduce its' solid waste by 25% by the end of 1994 and to further reduce its' total solid waste stream by 50% prior to the year 2000. The mayor added that funding had not been provided. Mayor Lilley announced that the City's Recycling Committee has been active and have addressed the challenge imposed by the State, and along with Wil -Mar Disposal, have been exploring options. He explained that some of the issues include a decision relating to mandatory waste pick-up, curbside recycling, "green" (yard) waste and defining the City's solid waste stream. The mayor stated that there is no free way to meet the legislative mandate and emphasized that it was vital to determine which option was the best way for the City of Atascadero to meet those requirements. Councilwoman Borgeson reported that she had heard from many members of the public over the past four days and stated that the community is already recycling. Mark Joseph gave a brief overview of the related reports, which included recommendations from the Recycling Committee, staff reports on curbside recycling, mandatory solid waste collection and the extension of Wil -Mar Disposal's contract; as well as an old appliance disposal service proposal and a rate analysis for Wil -Mar Disposal. Mr. Joseph indicated that staff has recommended that if the contract with Wil -Mar is extended, there be some significant contract language changes in order to accommodate both a rate review and clarification of responsibilities regarding mandatory pick-up. In addition, the Administrative Services Director, explained that staff had two primary recommendations: 1) adoption of a volume -based rate structure and 2) a thorough review six to nine months after the new rates are adopted. Renee Silberman, Recycling Committee Chairperson, reported that the committee was recommending that the Council adopt mandatory collection and support a volume based rate structure, as well as CC11/13/90 Page 5 a curbside recycling program. She described the recommended curbside pick-up program as a three -bin system which would provide a convenient means for the community to recycle. In addition, Ms. Silberman stated that the committee was eager to devise ways to recycle all materials, not just those with redemption value, and further reported that once a curbside program is initiated it could begin to develop a program for yard waste collection. Ms. Silberman emphasized that solid waste is a community problem and that mandatory pick-up would fairly distribute the cost of waste recycling and disposal, plus allow for monitoring of the waste stream as required by AB939. She reiterated that the Recycling Committee was in favor of an adjustment to the garbage collection rate structure to provide an incentive to reduce waste and advocated pre -cycling. The committee chairperson also reported that the committee had conducted a small, informal survey to find out if residents of Atascadero are ready for curbside recycling and reported that this survey indicated that the community is willing to participate in curbside recycling for a small fee. Concluding her report, Ms. Silberman thanked the Council for their cooperation and recent appointments to the committee. William J. Douglas, senior citizen of Atascadero, rendered his protest to mandatory pick-up and reported that because he was on a fixed income the added fee would be a burden to him. Betty Sanders, attorney representing Wil -Mar Disposal, spoke in support of mandatory pick-up and pointed out that one of the functions of a city is to provide for the collection of solid waste. The State, she said, has now given cities a mandate and if it is not met, a fine of $10,000/day will be assessed. Additionally, Ms. Sanders addressed the issue of extending Wil - Mar's contract. She reported that if mandatory pick-up and curbside recycling are adopted, Wil -Mar must make expenditures of over $300,000 and would, therefore, like some kind of guarantee that they will still be in business two years from now. The attorney also reported that Wil -Mar Disposal had been providing garbage pick-up service since 1975 and has done a good job over the years with few complaints about the service. Ms. Sanders, stated that the City is obligated, pursuant to State law, to encourage solid waste enterprise and quoted from AB939 as it relates to provisions for solid waste handling services. CC11/13/90 Page 6 �� �� �� �� Concluding her statements, Ms. Sanders emphasized that mandatory collection is the rule, and Atascadero is the exception. George Zidbeck, 1869 San Fernando Road, stated that while he was not against recycling or solid waste reduction, he strongly opposed mandatory pick-up. Gene Humphrey, San Marcos Road resident, urged the Council not to enforce mandatory pick-up because it represented the taking of one more right. He encouraged the provision of some kind of device for yard clippings. Steve Gordon, 4465 Viscano, expressed his concerns and suggested that the Council study the matter thoroughly and possibly hold a workshop to look at options. He stated that he opposed mandatory pick-up and the projected 70% increase in rates. Jerry Bond, 484O Verano, reported that he recycles and shares garbage pick-up service with his neighbors. He indicated that he, too, opposed mandatory pick-up. Tricia Stanley, 7775 Morro Road #3, announced that she was pro - recycling and that she strongly supported the recycling of glass, metal cans, phone books, newspapers, cardboard and aluminum cans. She suggested that the City implement spring and fall clean-up days when residents could have their green waste picked up. Ms. Stanley stated that she was in support of the recommendations made by Recycling Committee, but was concerned where she personally could store a three -bin container in her apartment and asked that the community be given the option to take their own recyclables in for redemption. Whitey Thorpe, 8015 Santa Ynez, referred to an attempt made in 1980 by a citizen, Kelly Gearhardt, to provide an alternative garbage pick-up service. He stated the community was denied the choice and proclaimed that competition in business is the key to the american way. Additionally, Mr. Thorpe debated comments made by attorney Betty Sanders, strongly opposed mandatory pick-up and spoke in support of a proposal by Dennis Bryant to provide a white goods pick-up and disposal service. Vic Smart, 8930 Palomar, reported that he no longer uses the services of Wil -Mar and has since elected to take his garbage to the dump himself. He acknowledged the difficulty of the present task and pointed out that the community will also have to face the issue of hazardous waste materials control. Mr. Smart stated that he did not believe that imposing mandatory pick-up would result in the reduction of solid waste and stressed the need for CC11/13/9O Page 7 i • a viable means of control and reduction. In addition, Mr. Smart asserted that there must also be a decision made as to where some items that are currently non -recyclable are going to be stored. Jerry Clay, 7285 Sycamore, stated that some responsibility should be put upon the landfill to recycle materials and spoke against imposing an additional cost to the consumer for picking up recyclables. He noted that he was recycling and that many others in the community were as well. Mr. Clay urged the Council to wait on the matter a while and watch what happens. Steve Williams, Ensenada Avenue resident, opposed mandatory pick- up and the removal of a right to make a choice. He stated that his major concern was for who sets the rates and whether or not all the programs were mandatory. The mayor called for a recess at 8:50 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:10 p.m. Don Kline, 5300 San Anselmo, proclaimed that mandatory pick-up is another infringement on the god -given rights of freedom and urged Council not to impose it. He indicated that he and many others already recycle. Mr. Kline reported that he had read that Wil - Mar was operating in the "red" and opposed strongly to requiring that the citizens of Atascadero bring them out it. Barbara Rider, 10150 San Marcos Road, remarked that she had been recycling for over twenty years and spoke in support of mandatory pick-up and curbside recycling. She suggested that the City communicate with other cities who provide curbside services and asked the community to begin putting pressure on the producers in an effort to cut down on non -recyclable packaging. Russ Wright, 7115 Gregorio Road, stated that he personally was against mandatory pick-up, but if it were imposed, could support the implementation of a volume -based rate structure. Ron Villarino, 10605 Realito Avenue, stated that while some people do recycle, a large majority of people do not. He reported that Atascadero is the only city that does not have mandatory pick-up and advocated elective curbside recycling. Mr. Villarino stated that the only way to start reducing is to make it convenient for those who presently do not recycle and noted that his experiences have shown that there is not much money to be made in the recycling business. He voiced support for allowing the garbage company, because of its' knowledge, to provide the curbside pick-up service, rather than contracting with a separate private company. CC11/13/90 Page 8 Larry Sherwin, 2755 Campo Road, spoke in opposition to mandatory pick-up and expressed concern for the upkeep of the private road that serves his residence and those of other neighbors who jointly paid to have the road put in. In addition, Mr. Sherwin explained that his children collected recyclable materials for redemption as a way to earn spending money and objected to having that privilege taken away. Roger Cook, 10600 Colorado Road, disputed mandatory pick-up, but urged a volume based rate structure if it is imposed. Pat Kusack, Arroyo Grande resident, spoke on behalf of Atlas Performance Industries. He commented that his company provides roll -off refuse services in Santa Maria and the unincorporated areas of Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo counties and were interested in providing their services to Atascadero. He cautioned, when and if the contract comes up for renewal or goes out to bid, that there be no mandatory arrangement or exclusive franchise. James Patterson, member of the Recycling Committee, addressed comments made by others relating to recommendations made by the committee. He clarified that the proposed curbside service is not mandatory and explained that the recommendation for the optional service was to provide a convenient, easy to use system for recycling to be used by those who are not currently recycling. Mr. Patterson reported that the programs throughout the county that are the most successful are those that are convenient for people to use. He added that it has been proven that when there is a curbside recycling program, there is a significant reduction of the solid waste stream. Mr. Patterson, in an effort to clear up any misconceptions about the proposed rate increases, reported that the staff's proposal of a one -can service, which would include the option to curbside recycle, would cost $7/month. The current rate, he explained, for one can garbage collection is $6/month, emphasizing that this recommendation did not constitute a 70% increase. He stated that a volume based rate structure is essential and clarified that it was the Recycling Committee who had recommended curbside recycling and mandatory pick-up, not Wil -Mar Disposal. In conclusion, Mr. Patterson stated that the community at large will benefit from a program that will provide a service uniformly to the entire community at a rate that is fairly distributed among the residents of Atascadero. Harry Russell, 3585 El Camino Real, stated that he was opposed to CC11/13/90 Page 9 mandatory pick-up but recognized that sometimes the public is not given a choice. He relayed empathy and support to the Council for the difficult choices they were faced with. Mike Sanders, 9550 Curbaril, spoke in opposition to mandatory pick-up because it was just another bill for his small family. Mari Mackey, Recycling Committee member, spoke on behalf of Mr. John Nelson of Atascadero who opposed mandatory pick-up. She stated that she did not agree with Mr. Nelson but had been asked to relay his opinion. Ms. Mackey stated that she personally was in favor of mandatory pick-up and commented that perhaps the word "universal" could have been used instead of mandatory. She spoke in high regard of Wil -Mar Disposal and asserted that the company has done a good job. She reported that she was supportive of curbside recycling and that Bill Gibbs, of Wil -Mar, has been receptive to the idea for a number of years and had simply been waiting for the City to get around to it. David Smith, C.P.A., addressed the Council pointing out that Wil - Mar is not operating in the "red". He stated that he had provided a cost breakdown in response to the City's request and noted the company's profit is low -return for output. Wil -Mar, he continued is trying to provide a service at a fee and make a profit. The accountant then shared that he personally does not recycle and asserted that most people in the community also do not. Council Comments: Councilwoman Borgeson clarified that under AB939, the State may impose the $10,000/day fine if the City does not present an adequate plan and, in addition, the element must have a waste diversion implementation schedule to achieve a 25% reduction of the solid waste sent to the landfill by January 1, 1995. She noted that there are a number of exceptions and provisions for jurisdictions which cannot meet such goals and a one year extension is possible if the city is acting in good faith. Councilwoman Borgeson also clarified that Atascadero is not the only city in the County that does not have mandatory pick-up. The City of Paso Robles, she explained, has not yet made citywide garbage collection mandatory. In addition, Councilwoman Borgeson stated that she agreed that the City must have a plan in place, but noted she differed with CC11/13/90 Page 10 0 0 staff's recommendation for implementation. She stated that there were still some unanswered questions relating to green waste, white (appliance) waste and the storage of newspaper. Councilman Nimmo expressed his appreciation to the Recycling Committee and to all those members of the public who came to speak on the matter. He stated that, in his opinion, State Legislature has finally done something constructive by mandating each city to have a plan in place by 1991 and reduce the flow of all waste, including hazardous waste. Councilman Nimmo stated that he hoped the Council would exert some leadership and do some public relations work to educate the public about what has to be done and what the options are. He commented that the Council must rise above popular opinion and do what is required by AB939 and that it also must do what is best to protect the environment for future generations. Councilman Dexter concurred with Councilman Nimmo and stated that it was unfortunate the word "mandatory" was attached. He spoke in support of recycling, whether it be done at the curb or otherwise, and stated that it along with a volume based rate structure would provide incentive. Councilman Shiers also thanked those who had come to speak on the issue. He indicated that at some point the community must face the issue that landfills are filling up, that it will be extremely expensive to buy land for new landfills and costly to meet all the EPA requirements. He agreed with Councilwoman Borgeson that there are issues that need to be studied further. Councilman Shiers concurred with the Recycling Committee and the staff's recommendations for a volume based rate structure. In addition, he stated that if mandatory pick-up is imposed, the responsible position would be to put that service out to bid. Concluding, Councilman Shiers commented that this is an important problem and advocated more public information to clarify the issues. Mayor Lilley stated that the time has come for the society to bite the bullet and recognize that continued growth along with a vital economy must be balanced out so as not to accelerate the depletion of landfills and exacerbate needless pollution. He indicated that the society has to collectively solve the problem as voluntary efforts will not resolve it. One reason for the mandatory element, the mayor noted, is to establish an inventory of who is taking service so that an effective solid waste program can be implemented fairly. CC 11/13/90 Page 11 0 Mayor Lilley thanked the committee for its' studious, responsive efforts, and thanked Wil -Mar Disposal for their cooperation. The mayor expressed the desire to explore other options and commented that his only criticism with the Recycling Committee report was of their recommendation to work on the reduction of green waste after other plans have been implemented. He explained that green waste represents the largest section, in excess of 50%, of the solid waste stream and that if the issue of efficient reduction of green waste was solved 100%, State mandates would be met for the next ten years. Concurring with other members of Council, Mayor Lilley indicated that he wanted to conduct further inquiries before adopting mandatory pick-up and suggested that the matter be continued for more discussion with a decision made sometime by the first of the new year. Councilwoman Borgeson agreed with the mayor's comments relating to green waste. In addition, she concurred with Councilman Shiers's statements relating to putting the matter of refuse pick-up out to bid. Councilwoman Borgeson stated that she had no problem with Wil -Mar Disposal as the provider of service over the years and added that she hoped that they would bid for the contract. The City Manager asked the Council to bear in mind that Wil -Mar still has two years to run on their contract and in addition to that, have also asked for an interim rate increase. Mayor Lilley outlined the various options as follows: 1) to act upon a requested increase of approximately 7-9%, 2) make policy decisions on mandatory pick-up and curbside recycling or 3) continue the matter for further hearing by the Council in response to those issues. Councilman Dexter suggested that Council, if it decides to support curbside recycling, may want to consider some type of anti -scavenger ordinance to protect the contractor responsible for pick-up. Councilwoman Borgeson suggested deferring the decision on the rate increase requested by Wil -Mar. Councilman Nimmo disagreed stating that the matter could not be continued any longer and indicated that he would be prepared to support the rate increase and defer the other matters. Councilwoman Borgeson asked Mark CC11/13/90 Page 12 Joseph to clarify whether or not Wil -Mar was in the "red". Mr. Joseph responded that at the current rates, Wil -Mar would most likely start losing money and indicated that some kind of rate increase needs to be addressed. He suggested that if Council defers for now the matter of mandatory pick-up and decides to pass an interim general rate increase, that staff be directed to work with Wil -Mar to come up with a volume based rate. Councilwoman Borgeson concurred with this concept. Brief discussion followed. Mayor Lilley proposed that Council submit in writing any additional specific concerns and asked the City Manager if staff would be in a position to report back prior to January 15, 1991. He also clarified that the request would include a proposal for a rate structure increase independent of either mandatory pick-up or curbside recycling. Mr. Windsor indicated a preference for the second meeting in January to allow staff ample time to prepare and distribute the information. Councilwoman Borgeson proposed conducting a workshop sometime before the end of January. The City Manager noted that because of the holiday season there would probably not be adequate time to hold such a study session. MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson and seconded by Councilman Nimmo to continue the matter until the second meeting in January of 1991; motion unanimously passed. C. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: 1. City Councils A. Committee Reports (The following status reports were given, as follows): 1. City/School Committee - The City Manager reported the committee would meet again during the month of December. 2. North Coastal Transit/S.L.O. Area Coordinating Council - Councilwoman Borgeson announced that the Coordinating Council would be meeting on the following day and that she would have a report at the next meeting. 3. Traffic Committee - No report. 4. Solid/Hazardous Waste Mgmt. Committee - No report. 5. Recycling Committee - Councilman Shiers reported that cc 11/13/90 Page 13 this committee had met the previous week and had formed sub -committees; one of which would be looking into the issue of green waste. 6. Economic Opportunity Commission - No report. 7. H.I.A. - The City Manager announced that the downtown parking lot would be completed on November 15, 1990 and suggested the planning of an opening ceremony. Mayor Lilley thanked the Streets Department and asked staff to schedule a date for a ribbon -cutting ceremony. 2. City Attorney The mayor asked Mr. Montandon to contact Jalynne Giles of Wells Fargo Bank regarding the closure of the Colony Roads issue. 3. City Clerk - No report 4. City Treasurer Muriel Korba announced that she would be out of the state during the next regular meeting and would, therefore, not have a report until the December meeting. 5. City Manager Mr. Windsor announced meeting dates as follows: November 27, 1990 at 7:00 p.m. for the regular meeting November 29, 1990 at 6:00 p.m. for a joint study session with the Planning Commission to review the Draft Fiscal Plan Model December 11, 1990 at 7:00 p.m. to meet in regular session to discuss the revised Tree Ordinance, the Downtown Master Plan and some tree removals. The City Manager proposed that Council defer the second meeting in December because it would fall on Christmas Day. MOTION: By Councilman Dexter and seconded by Councilman Nimmo to defer the second meeting in December; motion passed. MOTION: By Councilman Nimmo and seconded by Councilman Dexter to adjourn the meeting until November 27, 1990; motion unanimously carried. CC11/13/90 Page 14 • THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 10:45 P.M. MINUTES RECORDED AND PREPARED HY: LEE City CCii/13/90 Page 15 •