Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC_2014-10-28_Agenda Packet CITY OF ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Tuesday, October 28, 2014 6:00 P.M. City Hall Council Chambers, 4th floor 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, California (Enter on Lewis Ave.) REGULAR SESSION – CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council Member Moreno ROLL CALL: Mayor O’Malley Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant Council Member Fonzi Council Member Kelley Council Member Moreno APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call PRESENTATIONS: None A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the item before action is taken. DRAFT MINUTES: Council meeting draft min utes are listed on the Consent Calendar for approval of the minutes. Should anyone wish to request an amendment to draft minutes, the item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and their suggestion will be considered by the City Council. If anyone desires to express their opinion concerning issues included in draft minutes, they should share their opinion during the Community Forum portion of the meeting.) 1. City Council Draft Action Minutes – October 14, 2014  Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Draft Action Minutes of October 14, 2014. [City Clerk] 2. Award Contract for One (1) New Fire Engine & Refurbishment of Engines 7591 & 7592  Fiscal Impact: The fiscal impact would be the expenditure of a total of $962,201. The funds expended would be Bertha Shultz Trust Funds ($659,435), vehicle replacement funds ($179,766) and Fire Facilities Impact Fees Funds ($123,400).  Recommendations: Council: 1. Award a contract to Pierce Manufacturing Inc. for the construction and purchase of one (1) fire engine at a cost of $566,972; and, 2. Award a contract to Pierce Manufacturing Inc. to refurbish E-7591 & E- 7592 at a cost of up to $305,229; and, 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the appropriate agreements; and, 4. Authorize the Director of Administrative Services to appropriate $179,770 in Vehicle Replacement Funds, $123,000 in Fire Facilities Impact Fee Funds & $659,440 from the Bertha Schultz Trust Funds for these purchases. [Fire] 3. Proposition 1B Remaining Project Funding Reprioritization  Fiscal Impact: The impact of the Council action tonight would be the receipt and expenditure of approximately $111,120 in Proposition 1B funds.  Recommendations: Council: 1. Approve the use of approximately $111,120 of Proposition 1B State bond funds left over after the resurfacing of El Camino Real, for use on El Camino Real pedestrian facility upgrades and on the Lakeview Drive overlay project; and, 2. Authorize the Director of Administrative Services to appropriate $45,000 of Proposition 1B Funds for the El Camino Real Safety Upgrade Project; and 3. Authorize the Director of Administrative Services to appropriate an additional $66,120 of Proposition 1B Funds for the Lake View Overlay Project. [Public Works] 4. Extend Contract with Regional Government Services (RGS) For the Services of Public Works Advisor  Fiscal Impact: The cost of the proposed contracted services is offset by the payroll cost savings of the open position of Director of Public Works.  Recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to extend an existing agreement with Regional Government Services Authority (RGS) to provide contract services for a Public Works Advisor on a month to month basis until such time as a permanent appointment is made by the City Manager to fill the open position of Director of Public Works/City Engineer. [City Manager] UPDATES FROM THE CITY MANAGER: (The City Manager will give an oral report on any current issues of concern to the City Council.) COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to address the Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to three minutes. Please state your name for the record before making your presentation. Comments made during Community Forum will not be a subject of discussion. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless changed by the Council. Any members of the public who have questions or need information, may contact the City Clerk’s Office, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at 470-3400, or mtorgerson@atascadero.org.) B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. Colony Park Inclusive Playground Design  Fiscal Impact: None for this action.  Recommendation: The Parks & Recreation Commission recommends: Council adopt draft Resolution A approving the inclusive playground design for Colony Park, consistent with the Colony Park Master Plan. [Police/Recreation] 2. 2015 Special Olympics World Games  Fiscal Impact: It is anticipated that costs would be offset through donations and other fundraising efforts. There would, however, be staff time involved in assisting in organizing the event and participating in the County Host Town committee.  Recommendation: Council direct staff to have the City of Atascadero participate with other San Luis Obispo County cities as a Special Olympics World Game Host Town and to proceed with plans to organize the necessary activities. [City Manager] COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative, Council Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities. Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. The Council may take action on items listed on the Agenda.) D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: (The following represent standing committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary): Mayor O’Malley 1. City / Schools Committee 2. County Mayors Round Table 3. Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA) 4. SLO Council of Governments (SLOCOG) 5. SLO Regional Transit Authority (RTA) Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant 1. City / Schools Committee 2. City of Atascadero Finance Committee 3. League of California Cities – Council Liaison Council Member Fonzi 1. Air Pollution Control District 2. Oversight Board for Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency of Atascadero 3. SLO Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) Council Member Kelley 1. Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Committee 2. City of Atascadero Design Review Committee 3. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC) 4. Homeless Services Oversight Council Council Member Moreno 1. California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA) Board 2. City of Atascadero Finance Committee (Chair) 3. City of Atascadero Design Review Committee E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND / OR ACTION: 1. City Council 2. City Clerk 3. City Treasurer 4. City Attorney 5. City Manager F. ADJOURNMENT Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. Correspondence submitted at this public hearing will be distributed to the Council and available for review in the City Clerk's office. I, Lori Mlynczak, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing agenda for the October 28, 2014 Regular Session of the Atascadero City Council was posted on October 22, 2014, at the Atascadero City Hall, 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422 and was available for public review in the Customer Service Center at that location. Signed this 22nd day of October, 2014, at Atascadero, California. Lori Mlynczak, Deputy City Clerk City of Atascadero City of Atascadero WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 6:00 p.m. Council meetings will be held at the City Hall Council Chambers, 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero. Matters are considered by the Council in the order of the printed Agenda. Regular Council meetings are televised live, audio recorded and videotaped for future playback. Charter Communication customers may view the meeting s on Charter Cable Channel 20 or via the City’s website at www.atascadero.org. Meetings are also broadcast on radio station KPRL AM 1230. Contact the City Clerk for more information (470-3400). Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public inspection during City Hall business hours at the Front Counter of City Hall, 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, and on our website, www.atascadero.org. Contracts, Resolutions and Ordinances will be allocated a number once they are approved by the City Council. The minutes of this meeti ng will reflect these numbers. All documents submitted by the public during Council meetings that are either read into the record or referred to in their statement will be noted in the minutes and available for review in the City Clerk's office . In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager’s Office or the City Clerk’s Office, both at (805) 470-3400. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service. TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA Under Agenda item, “COMMUNITY FORUM”, the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having business with the Council to approach the lectern and be recognized. 1. Give your name for the record (not required) 2. State the nature of your business. 3. All comments are limited to 3 minutes. 4. All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council. 5. No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any other individual, absent or present This is the time item s not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council’s attention. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum (unless changed by the Council). If you wish to use a computer presentation to support your comments, you must notify the City Clerk 's office at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Digital presentations must be brought to the meeting on a USB drive or CD. You are required to submit to the City Clerk a printed copy of your presentation for the record. Please check in with the City C lerk before the meeting begins to announce your presence and turn in the printed copy. TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS (from Title 2, Chapter 1 of the Atascadero Municipal Code) Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will ident ify the subject, staff will give their report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being considered to s tep up to the lectern. If you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way: 1. You must approach the lectern and be recognized by the Mayor 2. Give your name (not required) 3. Make your statement 4. All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council 5. No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any other individual, absent or present 6. All comments limited to 3 minutes The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public comments will be heard by the Council. ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 10/28/14 Atascadero City Council October 14, 2014 Page 1 of 7 CITY OF ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES Tuesday, October 14, 2014 6:00 P.M. City Hall Council Chambers, 4th floor 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, California (Enter on Lewis Ave.) REGULAR SESSION – CALL TO ORDER: Mayor O’Malley called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m. and Council Member Kelley led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Council Members Kelley, Moreno, Fonzi, Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant, and Mayor O’Malley Absent: None Others Present: City Clerk / Deputy City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson Staff Present: City Manager Rachelle Rickard, Administrative Services Director Jeri Rangel, Community Development Director Warren Frace, Interim Public Works Director Doug Breeze, Police Chief Jerel Haley, Fire Chief Kurt Stone, and City Attorney Brian Pierik. ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 10/28/14 Atascadero City Council October 14, 2014 Page 2 of 7 APPROVAL OF AGENDA: MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant and seconded by Council Member Fonzi to approve the agenda. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. PRESENTATIONS: 1. Domestic Violence Awareness Month Proclamation presented to RISE The City Council presented the proclamation to RISE Associate Director Jesse Torrey. 2. SLO Regional Rideshare Presentation by Mallory Jenkins Mallory Jenkins gave a presentation to the City Council concerning Ride Share Month. 3. Employee Service Recognition Awards City Manager Rickard presented service awards to the following employees: 15 Years Becky Maxwell – Part-time Zoo Cashier 5 Years Flavia Parotti – Zookeeper 10 Years David Anastasia – IT/Systems Administrator Rochelle Hanson – Police Corporal Brian Westerman - Fire Engineer Michael Stornetta – Fire Engineer/Paramedic 15 Years Casey Bryson – Fire Captain 30 Years Stephen Sandeffer – Public Works Maintenance Worker A. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. City Council Draft Action Minutes – August 29, 2014  Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Draft Action Minutes of August 29, 2014. [City Clerk] ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 10/28/14 Atascadero City Council October 14, 2014 Page 3 of 7 2. City Council Draft Action Minutes – September 9, 2014  Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Draft Action Minutes of September 9, 2014. [City Clerk] 3. City Council Draft Action Minutes – September 11, 2014  Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Draft Action Minutes of September 11, 2014. [City Clerk] 4. City Council Draft Action Minutes – September 23, 2014  Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Draft Action Minutes of September 23, 2014. [City Clerk] 5. August 2014 Accounts Payable and Payroll Disbursements  Fiscal Impact: $2,058,220.32  Recommendation: Council approve certified accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for August 2014. [Administrative Services] 6. Memorandum of Understanding for the Atascadero Professional Firefighters Local 3600  Fiscal Impact: Changes to the MOU for the Atascadero Professional Firefighters Local 3600 will result in additional costs of approximately $43,000 annually.  Recommendations: Council: 1. Approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the Atascadero Professional Firefighters Local 3600; and, 2. Adopt the Draft Resolution Authorizing Employer Paid Member Contributions for the Full-time employees in the Safety-Fire Member Category; and, 3. Approve the Salary Schedule for Fiscal Year 2014 -2015. [City Manager] 7. Oakhaven Onsite Tract Improvements Acceptance and Letter of Credit Release and Reduction - 1155 El Camino Real  Fiscal Impact: None  Recommendations: Council: 1. Accept and certify the satisfactory completion of onsite tract improvements related to Building Permit BLD 2006 -05912, Tract 2614, Oakhaven Development; and, 2. Authorize staff to release the Labor and Material Letter of Credit for $294,979.00, and authorize the reduction of the Performance Letter of Credit for $589,958.00 to 10% of the original amount, or $58,996.00, for the one-year maintenance warranty period; and, ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 10/28/14 Atascadero City Council October 14, 2014 Page 4 of 7 3. Authorize staff to release the 10% Maintenance Warranty Letter of Credit upon satisfactory completion of the one-year maintenance period; and, 4. Authorize staff to release the $6,800.00 monument bond after the City Engineer confirms Tract 2614 surveying is complete. [Public Works] MOTION: By Council Member Fonzi and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (#6.1: Contract No. 2014-025, #6.2: Resolution No. 2014-064) UPDATES FROM THE CITY MANAGER: City Manager Rachelle Rickard gave an update on projects and issues within the City. COMMUNITY FORUM: The following citizens spoke during Community Forum: Pastor Steve Shively, Cole Gentilly, Halley Hahn, Tom Comar, Mitch Paskin, David Broadwater, Dana Cummings, Ray Johnson, Charles Scovell, Len Colamarino, Jerry Clay, and Chuck Ward. Mayor O’Malley closed the COMMUNITY FORUM period. Mayor O’Malley asked staff to respond to questions and comments made during Community Forum. City Manager Rickard and Community Development Director addressed the comments that were made. Mayor O’Malley recessed the meeting at 7:41 p.m. Mayor O’Malley reconvened the meeting at 7:58 p.m. B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Appeal of the Planning Commission’s Approval of the Sylvester’s Tree Removal Permit - PLN 2014-1520 - 6455 El Camino Real / West Mall frontage - (Sylvester’s Burgers)  Ex Parte Communications:  Fiscal Impact: The City will receive $1,066.67 into the Native Tree Fund, a payment for tree mitigation.  Recommendation: Council adopt Draft Resolution A, denying the appeal and upholding Planning Commission’s Tree Removal Permit approval to remove a potentially hazardous 64” Coast Live Oak tree located at 6455 El Camino Real. The Planning Commission’s conditions of approval include tree mitigation through payment of $1,066.67 to t he native tree fund; no on-site replanting is required of the applicant. [Community Development] ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 10/28/14 Atascadero City Council October 14, 2014 Page 5 of 7 Ex Parte Communications Kelley - received several phone calls and spoke to an Arborist Sturtevant - received several emails regarding ideas on how to save the tree O’Malley - received several emails and spoke to the owner of Sylvester’s prior to the Planning Commission meeting Fonzi - received several emails and phone calls, spoke with Mr. Hunt, and she contacted some of the Planning Commissioners regarding confusion on the vote whether replacement or payment into the tree fund Moreno - received emails and spoke to Commissioner Anderson regarding the split on the vote. Also spoke with the owner about his intention. Community Development Director Warren Frace gave the staff report and answered questions from the Council. PUBLIC COMMENT: The following citizens spoke on this item: Brian Englund, Chris Johns, Jerry Clay, Len Colamarino, Chuck Ward, David Broadwater, and Charles Bourbeau. Mayor O’Malley closed the Public Comment period. There was Council consensus on addressing the Downtown Master Plan as it pertains to trees in the near future. MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant and seconded by Council Member Fonzi to adopt Draft Resolution A, denying the appeal and upholding Planning Commission’s Tree Removal Permit approval to remove a potentially hazardous 64” Coast Live Oak tree located at 6455 El Camino Real, including the Planning Commission’s conditions of approval to require tree mitigation through payment of $1,066.67 to the native tree fund, and no on-site replanting is required of the applicant. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Resolution No. 2014- 065) Council Member Moreno stated that she wants to save the tree but the safety of our citizens comes first. C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. Resolution Reaffirming Council Intent Regarding meaning of “Repairing and Maintaining Neighborhood Roads and Other Roadways”  Fiscal Impact: No fiscal impact to tonight’s action.  Recommendation: Council adopt Draft Resolution A reaffirming City Council intent regarding the meaning of the phrase “repairing and ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 10/28/14 Atascadero City Council October 14, 2014 Page 6 of 7 maintaining neighborhood roads and other roadways” as referenced in the Advisory Measure. [City Manager] City Manager Rachelle Rickard gave the staff report and answered questions from the Council. PUBLIC COMMENT: The following citizens spoke on this item: David Broadwater, David Bentz, and Len Colamarino. Mayor O’Malley closed the Public Comment period. Does Not Include: Road Improvements – road widening, bikeways, new roads, roundabouts; or any road work or road improvements at the Del Rio/101 interchange or any traffic mitigation required as part of the WalMart & Annex projects. Mayor O’Malley recessed the meeting at 10:45 p.m. Mayor O’Malley reconvened the meeting at 10:50 p.m. MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant and seconded by Council Member Moreno to adopt Draft Resolution A reaffirming City Council intent regarding the meaning of the phrase “repairing and maintaining neighborhood roads and other roadways” as referenced in the Advisory Measure, with the following amendment to the 4th bullet point: Does Not Include: Road Improvements – road widening, bikeways, new roads, roundabouts; or any road work or road improvements at the Del Rio/101 interchange or any traffic mitigation required as part of the WalMart & Annex projects. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: Council Member Fonzi asked that the Council have the Atascadero Mutual Water Company discuss new legislation regarding ground water basin and sustainability. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: None Council Member Kelley 1. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC) – It was discussed at their last meeting that elected officials on EVC board requires Brown Act compliance. They have removed elected officials from th eir board of directors, but elected officials are still able to participate as liaisons. ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 10/28/14 Atascadero City Council October 14, 2014 Page 7 of 7 E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND / OR ACTION: None F. ADJOURNMENT Mayor O’Malley adjourned the meeting at 11:01 p.m. MINUTES PREPARED BY: ______________________________________ Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C. City Clerk / Deputy City Manager ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 10/28/14 Atascadero City Council Staff Report –Fire Department Award Contract for One (1) New Fire Engine & Refurbishment of Engines 7591 & 7592 RECOMMENDATIONS: Council: 1. Award a contract to Pierce Manufacturing Inc. for the construction and purchase of one (1) fire engine at a cost of $566,972; and, 2. Award a contract to Pierce Manufacturing Inc. to refurbish E-7591 & E-7592 at a cost of up to $305,229; and, 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the appropriate agreements; and, 4. Authorize the Director of Administrative Services to appropriate $179,770 in Vehicle Replacement Funds, $123,000 in Fire Facilities Impact Fee Funds & $659,440 from the Bertha Schultz Trust Funds for these purchases. DISCUSSION: On September 23, 2014 the City Council reviewed the allocation of funds received from the Bertha Schultz Trust Fund. The recommendation included the replacement of a wildland engine E-7573 with a Type I engine. The recommendation also included the refurbishment of E-7591 (a Type I engine) and E-7592 (also a Type I engine). Under Section III Proprietary Equipment and Goods of the Purchasing Policy, there is no bidding required for the awards of these types of contracts as there are qualitative differences between the products being sold. Proprietary vendors are those vendors that “that directly sell their products and do not use distributors or other outlets.” In other words, the City can purchase the same Ford F-150 pickup truck at any number of Ford dealers so it is not a proprietary purchase and is subject to bidding. Fire engines can typically only be purchased directly from the manufacturer and thus are proprietary and subject to the qualitative award process. ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 10/28/14 In accordance with Section III of the Purchasing Policy, a vehicle committee of three members, including the Fire Chief was formed. The vehicle committee has worked for the past 8 months investigating a possible purchase of a new engine to replace the Type III wildland engine E-7573 and the potential refurbishment of E-7591 & E-7592. Purchase of Engine to Replace E-7573 The committee determined that the replacement of E -7573, with a Type I or structure fire type engine will best serve the City of Atascadero. A Type I engine is much more useful and is more flexible, giving the fire department a better tool to meet its primary mission of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and Structure Fire response. This type of engine is “rated” or counted by the Insurance Services Office (ISO) whereas the Type III is not. Additionally, the Type I engine has greater capacities for pumped water flow per minute, equipment storage areas, and extra space for breathing apparatuses. (The department will continue to maintain two Type III wildland engines after this replacement.) Pierce Manufacturing was selected for the following reasons:  The engine will match our two existing Pierce Arrow XT fire engines which have been in service for 10 years and have served the community of Atascadero well.  The purchase of an identical engine will reduce costs for parts as the engines will use identical valves, filters, belts, etc.  The cost of Pierce for the value received is very competitive when compared to other manufacturer’s prices. Refurbishment of E-7591 & E-7592 The committee determined that the refurbishment of E-7591 and E-7592 would cost effectively extend the service life of these two engines. The fire service industry has begun to embrace the concept of fire apparatus refurbishment. Historically, the industr y has not refurbished fire apparatus because Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Federal Department of Transportation (DOT) standards continued to change, making fire apparatus obsolete 10-15 years after its manufacture date. Engines 7591 & 7592 are well built and sit on the best chassis in the industry. Staff purposely specified these engines to be built with longevity as a primary goal. These two engines are ideal for refurbishment and will serve the community 8 years longer than previously planned. While the vehicle committee solicited quotes from other vendors for the refurbishment of the two vehicles, Pierce Manufacturing was chosen by the vehicle committee for the following reasons:  Pierce Manufacturing had superior expertise when it came to refurbishing Pierce engines.  Pierce Manufacturing has a long history of quality workmanship .  Pierce Manufacturing sent (at no cost to the City) an engineer from their refurbishment division to review the existing condition of E-7591 & E-7592 in ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 10/28/14 order to make recommendations and prepare their quote for refurbishment, providing excellent customer service.  The cost proposed by Pierce Manufacturing was competitive wit h quotes received from other entities. Quotes While staff is recommending the award of the purchase of the new engine and the award of the refurbishment of the existing engines, the work will not take place all at once. Work on the engines will be performed sequentially to insure that adequate equipment is always in place to meet the City’s needs. By executing purchase orders for all of the work at once, Pierce has agreed to lock in the price at the amounts quoted. The amounts that Pierce has quoted are good until October 29, 2014 and any purchases made after the October 29, 2014 deadline would be more expensive. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact would be the expenditure of a total of $962,201. The funds expended would be Bertha Shultz Trust Funds ($659,435), vehicle replacement funds ($179,766) and Fire Facilities Impact Fees Funds ($123,400). ALTERNATIVES: 1. Council may not award contract or award contract to alternate company through the bid process. 2. Council may direct staff to continue to use current equipment, making repairs as needed and fund as necessary. 3. Council may postpone purchase with the understanding that the City will lose $26,000 due to a price increase which is set to take place October 30, 2014. ITEM NUMBER: A-3 DATE: 10/28/14 Atascadero City Council Staff Report – Public Works Department Proposition 1B Remaining Project Funding Reprioritization RECOMMENDATIONS: Council: 1. Approve the use of approximately $111,120 of Proposition 1B State bond funds left over after the resurfacing of El Camino Real, for use on El Camino Real pedestrian facility upgrades and on the Lakeview Drive overlay project; and, 2. Authorize the Director of Administrative Services to appro priate $45,000 of Proposition 1B Funds for the El Camino Real Safety Upgrade Project; and 3. Authorize the Director of Administrative Services to appropriate an additional $66,120 of Proposition 1B Funds for the Lake View Overlay Project. DISCUSSION: Council approved a $412,957 appropriation of Proposition 1B funding for local road maintenance in 2012. Council’s 2012 approval directed the funds toward the 2012 El Camino Real Slurry Seal Project. The project included resurfacing El Camino Real (from Vons to El Bordo Road) and resurfacing the roads directly around City Hall. This project was successfully completed in 2013, under budget, leaving remaining unspent Proposition 1B funds available for reallocation. Proposition 1B funds generally can be used for safety, traffic reduction, rehabilitation and preservation of local streets and highways. The funds must be allocated by the City Council in a public meeting and the funds must be allocated to the project prior to expenditure of the project. Although included in the 2012 ECR Slurry Seal Project, the 2012 Cou ncil staff report and reports submitted for Proposition 1B did not list the work around City Hall. Because only the work on ECR was called out, State representatives have recommended that we do not use the Proposition 1B funds on the resurfacing road work done around City Hall ITEM NUMBER: A-3 DATE: 10/28/14 (East Mall, Palma, West Mall & Lewis Ave.) The resurfacing work on the roads around City Hall cost a little over $30,000. Capital Projects funds (originally transfers for road repairs from the City’s General Fund) were used instead of Proposition 1B funds to pay for this roadwork around City Hall. This leaves a remaining balance of $111,120 of unallocated Proposition 1B funds. Staff is recommending that the money be used on additional local road maintenance and safety upgrade projects on El Camino Real. The City has until June 30, 2016, to spend the remaining Proposition 1B funds. Staff is proposing to use an estimated $45,000 on lighted midblock crosswalk safety upgrades on El Camino Real and any remaining funds on the upcoming Lakeview Drive Overlay project. There are three lighted crosswalks on El Camino Real from Highway 41 to Rosario Avenue. These three lighted crosswalk systems are safety enhancements, since there are no signals to stop traffic. The flashing crosswalk lights alert drivers to the presence of pedestrians. The existing lighted crosswalk systems are first generation and are reaching the end of their working life. In addition, the maintenance costs of the outdated equipment are increasing every year. Therefore, staff is proposing to replace these three systems with a more durable product. The proposed replacement lights are more reliable and maintenance parts are readily available. It is becoming more difficult to obtain repair parts for the older existing systems. The Lakeview Drive Overlay project is designed and ready to be released for bid. The project is on hold until spring, when warmer weather arrives, and the Lake Sediment Removal project is completed. If Council approves staff’s recommendation, the remaining Proposition 1B funds would be used toward this project. Conclusion: Staff is recommending that of the remaining $111,120 Prop 1B funds be used for performing the pedestrian lighted crosswalk upgrades on El Camino Real, and for the Lakeview Drive Overlay project. The lighted cross walk upgrades would consist of replacing the in-pavement lights and controllers and the Lakeview Road project includes a curb to curb overlay along with re- striping of lanes, bike lanes, pavement markings and lake pathway improvements. The lighted crosswalk upgrades would have an approximate 8-year life expectancy. The Lakeview Overlay will have a 20-30 year lifespan, typical to all overlay projects. FISCAL IMPACT: The impact of the Council action tonight would be the receipt and expenditure of approximately $111,120 in Proposition 1B funds. ATTACHMENTS: None ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/28/14 Atascadero City Council Staff Report – City Manager’s Office Extend Contract with Regional Government Services (RGS) For the Services of Public Works Advisor RECOMMENDATION: Council authorize the City Manager to extend an existing agreement with Regional Government Services Authority (RGS) to provide contract services for a Public Works Advisor on a month to month basis until such time as a permanent appointment is made by the City Manager to fill the open position of Director of Public Works/City Engineer. DISCUSSION: RGS is a management and administrative services provider that provides highly qualified personnel, among other professional services, to public sector agencies. RGS is an independent contractor that provides all salaries, benef its, insurance, liability coverage and taxes of the employees; the people working for or at the direction of RGS are employees or agents of RGS and are not employed by the City. Upon the departure of Russ Thompson, the City’s former Director of Public W orks and City Engineer, the City Manager executed an agreement with RGS to provide temporary employment services for a Public Works Advisor. Since July 27th, RGS has been providing the City with the services of Douglas Breeze to lead the Public Works Department on an interim basis. A recruitment process for the full-time position of Director of Public Works/City Engineer was opened in July. Applications have been received and reviewed, and the first round of interviews of seven well-qualified candidates for the position has now been completed. A review of those interview scores and comments is currently underway. We are optimistic that a finalist for the position will be appointed within a few weeks. However, depending upon which candidate is finally selected, the actual on-boarding process including a thorough background check and allowing the candidate to give ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/28/14 adequate notice at their current place of employment, could take some time. We are anticipating the agreement with RGS may need to be extended in order to accommodate these factors. Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to extend the existing agreement with RGS, if necessary, until such time as a successful candidate can assume the duties of the position. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact of the extension of the agreement for service for an additional two months, which includes the daily rate of $750 per day for approximately 14 days per month plus travel and housing costs, is estimated to be approximately $24,000 of General Funds. The cost of the proposed contracted services is offset by the payroll cost savings of the open position of Director of Public Works. ALTERNATIVES: Council could elect to not authorize the City Manager to extend the existing agreement. ATTACHMENTS: None ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/28/14 Atascadero City Council Staff Report – Recreation Division Colony Park Inclusive Playground Design RECOMMENDATION: The Parks & Recreation Commission recommends: Council adopt draft Resolution A approving the inclusive playground design for Colony Park, consistent with the Colony Park Master Plan. DISCUSSION: Background: Based on public comments received by the City Council in May of 2013, the City Council directed Staff to explore options for a public / private partnership to develop an inclusive special needs playground Inclusive special needs playgrounds take into account the needs of children with varying capabilities, including those with physical or sensory limitations. Staff met several times with the resident group now known as “Parents For Joy” to review options to develop a playground suitable for all children including those with special needs. As a result of this collaboration, Colony Park was identified as the ideal location for development of this type of recreational facility. In January of 2014, the City Council approved amendments to the Colony Park Master Plan that included the following: 1. Move Recreation Center and parking lot to as built locations. 2. Move playground (inclusive playground) and spray park to open areas east of the Recreation Center. 3. Decrease the area designated for the “future swim complex”, but still provide adequate area for an Olympic size swimming pool. 4. Show the basketball, bocce and petanque courts in the as built location 5. Indicate the amphitheater could be built along the Atascadero Creek. ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/28/14 2014 Amended Colony Park Master Plan 1 2 3 4 5 Area of Master Plan Amendment ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/28/14 Proposed Ramp Access Rubberized solid surface is provided With the master plan amendments approved, City Staff worked with “Parents for Joy” on conceptual designs for installation of an inclusive playground. In July of 2014 City Staff presented the conceptual designs for the inclusive playground to the Atascadero Parks and Recreation Commission. The Commission unanimously approved the design as presented. Analysis: “Parents For Joy” initially identified three (3) playground manufacturers that provided conceptual designs for the proposed playground. Based on conceptual design schemes submitted, the proposal submitted by Gametime was selected based on the following criteria:  Conceptual plans and sketches of the playground design u tilized input from Parents For Joy and City staff;  Primary design feature of the playground utilized a tree structure similar to oak trees, which are a native to the City;  The proposed structure is in character of the community. Conceptual Playground Design “Parents For Joy” worked with Gametime to select play features that will take special needs into account, while at the same time allowing them to play alongside children without disabilities The design of the structure provides the ability for outdoor play for those children with physical or sensory disabilities. The tree structure is designed with ramps capable of giving wheelchair bound children the ability to enjoy the sensation of being elevated within the tree. The design features of the playground include the following: ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/28/14  Rubberized solid surfacing that is poured in place (PIP) that makes the entire playground accessible for those children with disabilities that require wheelchairs and other devices;  Fully accessible tree structure with slides;  Rock-n-Raft boat like structure that seats up to six (6) and accommodates a wheelchair that rocks gently back and forth to simulate a boat ride;  A merry-go-around that has space for up to 12 children with four (4) seats that have attached seatbelts for additional safety;  Different types of slides, including a metal slide facing north to reduce sun exposure and heat and allow for children with cochlear implants the ability to utilize a slide;  12 swings including standard belt swings, infant/tot swings four (4) zero-g swings and two adaptive swings with harness systems;  An arch swing for use with both adults and children;  An egg rock that can be used to rock back and forth that doubles as a safe space for children when they are overstimulated;  Dragonfly teeter-totter that can accommodate up to three (3) children;  Additional periphery equipment such as logs, vine climbers, leaf spinners for additional stimulation and activity play;  Shade structures located in strategic locations to allow for play during all times of the day. In addition, features for the playground that will cater to the sensory needs of children with disabilities is included in the proposed playground structure and area. The majority of these structures that cater to the sensory needs are provided by the manufacturer. Gametime has agreed to work with other vendors for those structures they do not provide. Construction Time Frame and Funding “Parents For Joy” are working with local area vendors and cont ractors to encourage them to donate work and supplies to the project. Approval of the design concept will allow “Parents For Joy” to finalize cost estimates for the playground and move forward with their fundraising efforts. This will also allow the group to proceed with solicitation of contractors for donations of labor and materials. Summary: The 2014 Colony Park Master Plan amendment relocated the proposed playground to an open area next to the Community Center building. The proposed “all-inclusive” playground would include play structures and activities for all children, including those with disabilities. The playground is designed to provide access at all levels to give children a healthy sense of play and to be among their peers as equals. The prop osed playground would become a community asset and be a draw not just for residents within the City, but for all parents around the County. With a recommendation of approval, this would allow for “Parents of Joy” and City Staff to research available grant funding and raise the funds needed for this project. ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/28/14 FISCAL IMPACT: None for this action. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Council may make minor changes to the project as recommended. 2. Council may determine that more information is needed on some aspect of the project and may refer the item back to staff to develop the additional information. 3. Council may decide not to approve the project as recommended. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Colony Park Master Plan Amendment 2014-1 2. Location Map 3. Playground Design Renderings 4. Proposed Playground Site Plan 5. Park Design Overlay 6. Draft Resolution A ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/28/14 Attachment 1: Colony Park Master Plan Amendment 2014-1 ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/28/14 Attachment 2: Location Map / Aerial Photo Inclusive Playground location ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/28/14 Attachment 3: Playground Design Renderings ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/28/14 ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/28/14 Attachment 4: Proposed Playground Site Plan ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/28/14 Attachment 5: Park Design Overlay ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/28/14 Attachment 6: Draft Resolution A Council Approval of Inclusive Playground Design DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING THE INCLUSIVE PARK DESIGN PLAN FOR COLONY PARK LOCATED AT APN 028-361-033 (CITY OF ATASCADERO) WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero (6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422), recognizes the need for an inclusive playground to be built at Colony Park (formerly Traffic Way Park); and, WHEREAS, the Colony Park Master Plan amendments were approved by the City Council on February 11, 2014; and, WHEREAS, the Colony Park Master Plan revision designated an area for an inclusive (special needs compatible) playground to be built; and, WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero has worked with Parents For Joy to identify appropriate play structures and design in the development of a special needs playground within Colony Park; and, WHEREAS, Parents For Joy have identified Gametime as the preferred vendor for the playground design and construction; and, WHEREAS, the Atascadero Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed playground design at their July 24, 2014 meeting and are recommending approval; and, WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the proposed playground design October 28, 2014 at 6:00 p.m. and considered testimony and reports from staff and the public. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero takes the following actions: ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/28/14 SECTION 1. Approval. The City Council of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on October 28, 2014, resolved to approve the Colony Park Inclusive Playground Design, subject to the following: EXHIBIT A: Colony Park Master Plan Amendment 2004-1 EXHIBIT B: Proposed Playground Site Plan EXHIBIT C: Conceptual Playground Renderings On motion by Council Member ______________________, and seconded by Council Member ___________________, the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: ______________________________ Tom O’Malley, Mayor ATTEST: Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________________ Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/28/14 EXHIBIT A: Colony Park Master Plan Amendment 2014-1 5599 Traffic Way Inclusive Playground location ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/28/14 EXHIBIT B: Proposed Playground Site Plan 5599 Traffic Way Boat play structure Accessible ramps Area of swings Play structure area Poured in Place (PIP) rubberized court Throughout site ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/28/14 EXHIBIT C: Conceptual Playground Renderings 5599 Traffic Way ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/28/14 Atascadero City Council Staff Report – City Manager’s Office 2015 Special Olympics World Games RECOMMENDATION: Council direct staff to have the City of Atascadero participate with other San Luis Obispo County cities as a Special Olympics World Game Host Town and to proceed with plans to organize the necessary activities. DISCUSSION: Los Angeles will host the Special Olympics World Games next summer. Over 7,000 athletes will participate from 177 countries. Special Olympics has developed the Host Town Program to help athletes acclimate to the area and climate before the games begin. They are in the process of recruiting approximately 100 host towns to provide housing, meals, activities, transportation and practice facilities the three days prior to the games. Because the cities within San Luis Obispo County are small jurisdictions, accommodating these requests could prove difficult for each city individually. Therefore, several cities within the County are proposing to jointly serve as countywide Host Towns. This will result in a much more feasible level of responsibility for each jurisdiction. The cities within San Luis Obispo County would be responsible for hosting approximately 100 athletes. Cal Poly University has agreed to provide dor m rooms, breakfasts and practice facilities. This will leave the participating Host Towns to provide lunch and evening activities, as well as transportation to and from Cal Poly. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/28/14 It is tentatively proposed that North County host the athletes for an afte rnoon and evening event on July 21st, Morro Bay be responsible for a luncheon event on July 22 nd, San Luis Obispo will organize a dinner and Farmers’ Market evening event on July 22 nd, and South County be responsible for the activities of July 23 rd. Staff recommends that the City of Atascadero participate in this joint countywide effort. Tentative preliminary plans include hosting the athletes at the July 21, 2015 Tuesday Evenings in the Park event with an Elks Bar-B-Q dinner along with a tour of the Charles Paddock Zoo. It is recommended the City of Atascadero involve our local service clubs, and the Chamber of Commerce in the planning and fundraising for this event. It has been proposed that a countywide committee be established to include a city, chamber of commerce, and community representative from each jurisdiction, along with Special Olympics and Cal Poly representatives, in order to agree on the overall schedule and to make arrangements for transportation. Each jurisdiction would then form its own committee to plan each individual event. The Host Town program offers an opportunity to support an excellent organization and provides significant benefits to thousands of people with disabilities throughout the world, and provides an opportunity for members of the community to get involved with this worthwhile event. In addition, it will provide the City with recognition as a participating Host Town. The first step of this joint Host City effort is to schedule an official announcement. A representative from the World Games would be here for the announcement and it has been tentatively recommended the official announcement be held in San Luis Obispo with all the Mayors in mid-November. FISCAL IMPACT: It is anticipated that costs would be offset through donations and other fundraising efforts. There would, however, be staff time involved in assisting in organizing the event and participating in the County Host Town committee. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Council may decide to not participate in the Host Town program. 2. Council may provide other direction to staff. ATTACHMENTS: Special Olympics W orld Games Host Town Flyers     www.LA2015.org Special Olympics World Games Los Angeles 2015 HOST TOWN PROGRAM JULY 21 – 24, 2015 What is the Host Town Program? The Host Town Program is a very special 3-day program that takes place prior to the Opening Ceremony of the Special Olympics World Games 2015. At their Host Towns, athletic delegations from around the world will be welcomed and celebrated. Their Host Town’s schedule of events will include getting to know community members, taking part in cultural activities unique to your area, and--of course--practicing and resting for the games. The Special Olympics athletes will feel truly celebrated and Host Town members will make friends for life. When are the Host Towns? Delegations arrive on July 21 and delegations depart on July 24, 2015. What communities can be Host Towns? Host Towns can be the largest cities or the smallest towns in Southern California—and, in some cases, they can also be civic groups and clubs. Communities located from San Luis Obispo to San Diego are eligible. Altogether, there will be approximately 100 Host Towns. How many athletes would spend time at a Host Town? Host Towns will have the opportunity to roll out the red carpet for approximately 100 athletes--typically one or two delegations. What does a Host Town have to do? The Host Town will be responsible for 100% of the costs of hosting their delegations, which includes expenses such as lodging and food. The World Games 2015 has experience advising Host Towns and can provide suggestions for securing in-kind donations and holding fundraisers. Why should my community become a Host Town? You and your neighbors will be taking part in the largest humanitarian and athletic event Los Angeles has seen since the 1984 Olympics. Over 7,000 athletes will show courage, determination and joy as they spend four days in your community and then go on to compete in 25 different events during the World Games. Your community will serve a very special role, welcoming Special Olympic athletes to SoCal and getting to know them. After these three never-to-be-forgotten days, the athletes will be changed for the better…and so will you. For more information contact: Joann Klonowski, Vice President, Host Town Program Joann.Klonowski@LA2015.org | Office: (213) 892-6038 | Mobile: (213) 369-1510 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/28/14           www.LA2015.org Special Olympics World Games Los Angeles 2015 HOST TOWN PROGRAM JULY 21 – 24, 2015 It’s easy to get started! Use the resources of your community to set up your Host Town Accommodations – You will need to identify approximately 50 double-occupancy rooms for the athletes in or near your community. Talk to local colleges and universities about a donation of dormitory space. Or, speak to hotel chains in your area—many will want to be part of the Special Olympics experience either by donating space or providing rooms at a discount. Make sure you have plenty of volunteers on hand to welcome the athletes, show them to their rooms and assist with baggage. Training Facilities – You should make sure that the athletes have a way to practice their skills prior to the Games or just have an opportunity to work out. Check with local schools to find out what facilities might be available, including a gym with training facilities, a soccer-style field and a track. Food – You will want to supply nutritious food and plenty of water. As with any athlete, it is important that they be given healthy breakfasts, lunches and dinners. Make arrangements with local restaurants, civic clubs, and colleges to provide meals for athletes. Involve community members in a giant Pot Luck. Ask local markets for food donations. Transportation – You should determine your transportation needs. The World Games 2015 will be responsible for bringing the Special Olympics athletes to and from your community. You will need to arrange transportation to bring them to local events during their visit. Speak to local bus companies, car dealers or car rental agencies to see whether they can contribute their services or provide a discounted rate. Activities – You should plan some great activities to introduce the athletes to your community and spread the word about the World Games. Arrange for 2 two-hour events to be held on July 22 and July 23, and a possible activity on July 21 if the delegation arrives earlier in the day. Be sure to highlight what is unique about your community, such as a historic site. Bring in local artists, writers, and performers to create special events. Look for interesting places to hold cultural events. Security – You will need to supply basic oversight of your events to make sure your three days go smoothly. Recruit local volunteers to be on site. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/28/14 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/28/14 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/28/14           350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 200, Los Angeles, California 90071 USA www.LA2015.org HONORARY CO-CHAIRS President of the United States Barack Obama First Lady of the United States Michelle Obama HONORARY HOSTS Governor of California Jerry Brown Mayor of Los Angeles Eric Garcetti BOARD OF DIRECTORS Chair Rob Friedman Debi Anderson Rick Caruso Mark Davis Anita DeFrantz Donna de Varona Dr. Edward Ellison Todd Goldstein Rafer Johnson Michelle Kerrick Andrew Knox Sherry Lansing Cindy McCain William O’Brien David O’Connor Maidie Oliveau Dustin Plunkett Donna Pulini Susan Saint James Barry Sanders David Simon Bryan Stockton Dick Van Kirk       Special  Olympics  World  Games  Los  Angeles  2015  truly  is  an  international  event.  Without  the   participation  of  the  many  local  programs  around  the  world,  the  Special  Olympics  movement  wouldn’t   continue  let  alone  the  World  Games.  The  most  recent  count  of  participating  delegations  registered  177   countries  –  all  are  listed  below.       Algeria Andorra Afghanistan Albania Argentina Armenia American Samoa Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Baharain Barbados Bangladesh Belarus Belgium Belize Bermuda Bharat / India Benin Bhutan Bolivia Bonaire Bosnia & Herzogovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Cayman Islands Cambodia Camerun Canada Chad Chile China Chinese Taipei Colombia Congo Comoros Costa Rica Cote  d’Ivoire     Croatia Cuba Curacao Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Estonia Faroe Island Fiji Finland France Georgia Republic Germany Ghana Gibraltar Great Britain Greece Guadeloupe Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan / Nippon Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Korea Kosovo (under UNSCR 1244/99) Kyrgyz Republic Kuwait Laos Latvia Lebanon Libya Lithuania Luxembourg Macau FYR Macedonia Malawi Mali Malaysia Malta Maldives Mauritania Mauritus Mexico Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Montserrat Myanmar Namibia Netherlands New Zealand Nepal Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Panama ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/28/14         350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 200, Los Angeles, California 90071 www.LA2015.org Papua New Guinea Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Romania Russia Rwanda San Marino Samoa Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia &Montenego Seychelles Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Somalia South Africa Spain Serendib (Sri lanka) St.Kitts & Nevis St.Lucia St.Martin St. Vincents Sudan Suriname Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Tajikistan Tanzania Togo Tongan Thailand Timore Leste Trinidad &Tobago Tunisia Team USA Turkey Turkmenistan Uganda United Arab Emirates Uruguay Uzbekistan Ukraine Venezuela Vietnam Virgin Islands Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe       ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/28/14