HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC_2014-09-09_Agenda Packet
CITY OF ATASCADERO
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
Tuesday, September 9, 2014
City Hall Council Chambers, 4th floor
6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, California
(Enter on Lewis Ave.)
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION: 5:00 P.M.
1. CLOSED SESSION -- PUBLIC COMMENT
2. COUNCIL LEAVES CHAMBERS TO BEGIN CLOSED SESSION
3. CLOSED SESSION -- CALL TO ORDER
a. Conference with Labor Negotiators
Government Code Section 54957.6
Agency designated representatives: Rachelle Rickard, City Manager
Employee Organization: Atascadero Firefighters Bargaining Unit
City Council Closed Session: 5:00 P.M.
City Council Regular Session: 6:00 P.M.
Successor Agency to the Community Immediately following
Redevelopment Agency of Atascadero: conclusion of the City
Council Regular Session
b. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Govt. Code 54957)
Title: City Manager
4. CLOSED SESSION -- ADJOURNMENT
5. COUNCIL RETURNS TO CHAMBERS
6. CLOSED SESSION – REPORT
REGULAR SESSION – CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant
ROLL CALL: Mayor O’Malley
Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant
Council Member Fonzi
Council Member Kelley
Council Member Moreno
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call
PRESENTATIONS:
1. September Recovery Month Proclamation
2. Patriotism Week Proclamation
3. Skate Park Presentation by Kevin Campion
A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (All items on the consent calendar are considered to
be routine and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion
if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If
comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the
consent calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an
opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the
item before action is taken. DRAFT MINUTES: Council meeting draft minutes
are listed on the Consent Calendar for approval of the minutes. Should anyone
wish to request an amendment to draft minutes, the item will be removed from
the Consent Calendar and their suggestion will be considered by the City
Council. If anyone desires to express their opinion concerning issues included in
draft minutes, they should share their opinion during the Community Forum
portion of the meeting.)
1. City Council Draft Action Minutes – August 12, 2014
Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Draft Action Minutes
of August 12, 2014. [City Clerk]
2. June Disbursements
Fiscal Impact: $1,555,973.64
Recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable,
payroll and payroll vendor checks for June 2014 [Administrative Services]
3. July Disbursements
Fiscal Impact: $2,558,342.50
Recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable,
payroll and payroll vendor checks for July 2014 [Administrative Services]
4. June Treasurer’s Report
Fiscal Impact: None
Recommendation: Council receive and file the City Treasurer’s report for
quarter ending June 30, 2014 [Administrative Services]
5. Amendment Number 1 to the Cooperation Agreement for the
Community Development Block Grant Program Fiscal Years 2015/16
through 2017/2018
Fiscal Impact: The approval of Amendment No. 1 will provide an extension
of the CDBG funding to include the 2017/2018 fiscal year term.
Recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to execute
Amendment Number 1 to the Cooperation Agreement between the County
of San Luis Obispo and the City of Atascadero for joint participation in the
Community Development Block Grant Program for Fiscal Years
2015/2016 through 2017/2018. [Public Works]
6. Municipal Ordinance Banning the Possession of Synthetic Spices
and/or Synthetic Bath Salts
Fiscal Impact: None
Recommendation: Council adopt on second reading, by title only, the
proposed ordinance to ban the possession and sale of synthetic spice
and/or synthetic bath salts. [Police]
7. Title 3 Amendment - Cardroom Ordinance - Increase in the Maximum
Number of Card Tables - Removal of Betting Limits
Fiscal Impact: The amendment should have a modest positive fiscal
impact on the City.
Recommendation: Council adopt on second reading, by title only, the
proposed ordinance amending the City’s Cardroom Ordinance.
[Community Development]
UPDATES FROM THE CITY MANAGER: (The City Manager will give an oral report on
any current issues of concern to the City Council.)
COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to
address the Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has
jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to three minutes . Please state your name for the
record before making your presentation. Comments made during Community Forum
will not be a subject of discussion. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for
Community Forum, unless changed by the Council. Any members of the public who
have questions or need information, may contact the City Clerk’s Office, between the
hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at 470-3400, or mtorgerson@atascadero.org.)
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. PLN 2014-1499 - ZCH 2014-0173 / TPM 2014-0101 / CUP 2014-0282 –
4-Unit Single-Family Planned Development Overlay #7 (PD-7) - 10380 El
Camino Real (Michaud / Henderson)
Ex Parte Communications:
Fiscal Impact: The City has developed standard conditions of approval for
new development projects that require the cost of maintenance and
emergency services to be funded by the project.
Recommendations:
Planning Commission Recommends the Council:
1. Adopt Resolution A certifying Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration
2014-0006; and,
2. Introduce for first reading, by title only, Draft Ordinance A approving
Zone Change 2014-0173 for a Planned Development #7 overlay,
based on findings; and,
3. Adopt Resolution B approving Conditional Use Permit 2014 -0282 to
include the Master Plan of Development based on findings and subject
to Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring; and,
4. Adopt Resolution C approving Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 2014 -
0101, based on findings and subject to Conditions of Approval and
Mitigation Monitoring. [Community Development]
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Transfer of PG&E Rule 20A Credits To the City of Paso Robles
Fiscal Impact: None
Recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to execute the
Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Atascadero and the
City of Paso Robles to Transfer $500,000 of PG&E Rule 20A Credits . [City
Manager]
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative, Council
Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activ ities.
Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take
action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. The Council may
take action on items listed on the Agenda.)
Mayor O’Malley – Veterans’ Services
At Mayor O’Malley’s request, there was Council consensus at the August 12 th
Council meeting to direct staff to place the issue of appointing a liaison with all
veterans’ organizations on the next Council agenda.
Mayor O’Malley’s Recommendation: Council appoint Council Member Fonzi to
be the Council’s liaison to veterans’ organizations in our area.
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: (The following represent standing committees.
Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary):
Mayor O’Malley
1. City / Schools Committee
2. County Mayors Round Table
3. Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA)
4. SLO Council of Governments (SLOCOG)
5. SLO Regional Transit Authority (RTA)
Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant
1. City / Schools Committee
2. City of Atascadero Finance Committee
3. League of California Cities – Council Liaison
Council Member Fonzi
1. Air Pollution Control District
2. Oversight Board for Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment
Agency of Atascadero
3. SLO Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo)
Council Member Kelley
1. Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Committee
2. City of Atascadero Design Review Committee
3. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC)
4. Homeless Services Oversight Council
Council Member Moreno
1. California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA ) Board
2. City of Atascadero Finance Committee (Chair)
3. City of Atascadero Design Review Committee
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND / OR ACTION:
1. City Council
2. City Clerk
3. City Treasurer
4. City Attorney
5. City Manager
F. ADJOURNMENT TO THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF ATASCADERO
Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that
person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. Correspondence submitted at this
public hearing will be distributed to the Council and available for review in the City Clerk's office.
I, Lori Mlynczak, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of perjury that
the foregoing agenda for the September 9, 2014 Regular Session of the Atascadero City Council was
posted on September 3, 2014, at the Atascadero City Hall, 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, CA
93422 and was available for public review in the Customer Service Center at that location.
Signed this 3rd day of September, 2014, at Atascadero, California.
Lori Mlynczak, Deputy City Clerk
City of Atascadero
City of Atascadero
WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 6:00 p.m. Council
meetings will be held at the City Hall Council Chambers, 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero. Matters are considered by the
Council in the order of the printed Agenda. Regular Council meetings are televised live, audio recorded and videotaped
for future playback. Charter Communication customers may view the meetings on Charter Cable Chan nel 20 or via the
City’s website at www.atascadero.org. Meetings are also broadcast on radio station KPRL AM 1230. Contact the City
Clerk for more information (470-3400).
Copies of the staff reports or other doc umentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file
in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public inspection during City Hall business hours at the Front Counter of
City Hall, 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, and on our website, www.atascadero.org. Contracts, Resolutions and
Ordinances will be allocated a number once they are approved by the City Council. The minutes of this meeting will
reflect these numbers. All documents submitted by the public during Council meetings that are either read into the record
or referred to in their statement will be noted in the minutes and available for review in the City Clerk's office .
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting
or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager’s Office or the City Clerk’s Office, both at (805)
470-3400. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in
assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA
Under Agenda item, “COMMUNITY FORUM”, the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having business with the
Council to approach the lectern and be recognized.
1. Give your name for the record (not required)
2. State the nature of your business.
3. All comments are limited to 3 minutes.
4. All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council.
5. No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any other
individual, absent or present
This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council’s attention. A maximum of 30 minutes will be
allowed for Community Forum (unless changed by the Council). If you wish to use a computer presentation to support
your comments, you must notify the City Clerk's office at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Digital presentations must
be brought to the meeting on a USB drive or CD. You are required to submit to the City Clerk a printed copy of your
presentation for the record. Please check in with the City Clerk before the meeting begins to announce your pre sence
and turn in the printed copy.
TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS (from Title 2, Chapter 1 of the Atascadero Municipal Code)
Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will give their
report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is open and
will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being considered to step up to the lectern. If
you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way:
1. You must approach the lectern and be recognized by the Mayor
2. Give your name (not required)
3. Make your statement
4. All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council
5. No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or ne gative personal remarks concerning any other
individual, absent or present
6. All comments limited to 3 minutes
The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public comments will be
heard by the Council.
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Atascadero City Council
August 12, 2014
Page 1 of 8
CITY OF ATASCADERO
CITY COUNCIL
DRAFT ACTION MINUTES
Tuesday, August 12, 2014
City Hall Council Chambers, 4th floor
6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, California
(Enter on Lewis Ave.)
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION: 5:00 P.M.
Mayor O’Malley announced at 5:01 p.m. that the Council is going into Closed Session.
1. CLOSED SESSION -- PUBLIC COMMENT - None
2. COUNCIL LEAVES CHAMBERS TO BEGIN CLOSED SESSION
3. CLOSED SESSION -- CALL TO ORDER
a. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
Save Atascadero v. City of Atascadero, et al.
San Luis Obispo County Superior Court Case No. CV 128230
City Council Closed Session: 5:00 P.M.
City Council Regular Session: 6:00 P.M.
Successor Agency to the Community Immediately following
Redevelopment Agency of Atascadero: conclusion of the City
Council Regular Session
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Atascadero City Council
August 12, 2014
Page 2 of 8
b. Conference with Labor Negotiators
Government Code Section 54957.6
Agency designated representatives: Rachelle Rickard, City Manager
Employee Organization: Atascadero Firefighters Bargaining Unit
c. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation
Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
William J. Vetter et al. v. City of Atascadero
Case No. CV 128276
d. Conference with Real Property Negotiators
Government Code Section 54956.8
Property: 11612 Madreselva Lane
Agency Negotiator: City Manager Rachelle Rickard
Negotiating Parties: Bank of America
Under Negotiations: Price and/or terms of payment.
4. CLOSED SESSION -- ADJOURNMENT
5. COUNCIL RETURNS TO CHAMBERS
6. CLOSED SESSION – REPORT
City Attorney Pierik announced that there was no reportable action taken. He also
explained that the City has won the Save Atascadero lawsuit against the City
concerning WalMart.
REGULAR SESSION – CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M.
Mayor O’Malley called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m. and asked Boy Scout Troop
#155 to lead the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Council Members Kelley, Moreno, Fonzi, Mayor Pro Tem
Sturtevant, and Mayor O’Malley
Absent: None
Others Present: City Clerk / Assistant to City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson
Staff Present: City Manager Rachelle Rickard, Deputy Administrative Services
Director Cindy Chavez, Community Development Director Warren
Frace, Interim Public Works Director Douglas Breeze, Police Chief
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Atascadero City Council
August 12, 2014
Page 3 of 8
Jerel Haley, Fire Chief Kurt Stone, Police Commander Joe Allen,
and City Attorney Brian Pierik.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant and seconded by Council
Member Fonzi to approve the agenda.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll call vote.
PRESENTATIONS:
1. Lighthouse Presentation
Commander Joe Allen introduced Wayne Cooper, Donn Clickard, Chris Balogh, & DJ
Pittenger who gave the presentation to the City Council.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. City Council Draft Action Minutes – July 8, 2014
Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Draft Action Minutes
of July 8, 2014. [City Clerk]
2. Historic City Hall Project Bid Award: ACH-13a Exterior Lighting Fixture
and Bulb Purchase
Fiscal Impact: The fiscal impact of this award will be announced at the
August 12, 2014 Council meeting. The award is budgeted in CCHE grant
and City Funds.
Recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to execute a
contract, with the lowest responsible bidder, in an amount to be
determined at the bid opening on August 7th, 2014, for the purchase of
lighting fixtures and bulbs for the Atascadero City Hall Exterior Lighting
Project. [Public Works]
City Manager Rickard pulled Item #A-2.
MOTION: By Council Member Fonzi and seconded by Council Member
Kelley to approve Item #A-1 of the Consent Calendar.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
Item #A-2: City Manager Rickard explained that the Bid Opening for this project was
conducted on August 7, 2014. The lowest bidder was C ED in the amount of
$110,220.00 (Exhibit A)
PUBLIC COMMENT: Ed Veek
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Atascadero City Council
August 12, 2014
Page 4 of 8
Mayor O’Malley closed the Public Comment period.
MOTION: By Mayor O’Malley and seconded by Council Member Kelley to
authorize the City Manager to execute a contract, with CED, in
an amount of $110,220.00, for the purchase of lighting fixtures
and bulbs for the Atascadero City Hall Exterior Lighting
Project.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Contract No. 2014-020)
UPDATES FROM THE CITY MANAGER:
City Manager Rachelle Rickard gave an update on projects and issues within the City.
Mayor O’Malley suggested that he would like to appoint Council Member Fonzi to be the
Council’s liaison to Veterans organizations.
There was Council consensus to direct staff to place the issue of
appointing a liaison with all veterans’ organizations on the next Council agenda.
COMMUNITY FORUM:
The following citizens spoke during Community Forum: Ted Mort, Edward Veek, and
Jerry Clay.
Mayor O’Malley closed the COMMUNITY FORUM period.
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Introduction of a Municipal Ordinance Prohibiting the Possession and
Sale of Synthetic Spices and/or Synthetic Bath Salts
Ex Parte Communications:
Fiscal Impact: None.
Recommendation: Council introduce for first reading, by title only, the
Draft Ordinance adding Title 5, Chapter 16 to the Atascadero Municipal
Code, prohibiting the possession and sale of certain intoxicating chemical
compounds known as synthetic drugs. [Police]
Commander Joe Allen gave the staff report and answered questions from the Council.
Ex Parte Communications: None
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Atascadero City Council
August 12, 2014
Page 5 of 8
PUBLIC COMMENT:
The following citizens spoke on this item: Jerry Clay, and Ed Veek.
Mayor O’Malley closed the Public Comment period.
MOTION: By Council Member Moreno and seconded by Council Member
Kelley to:
1. Introduce for first reading, by title only, the Draft Ordinance
adding Title 5, Chapter 16 to the Atascadero Municipal
Code, prohibiting the possession and sale of certain
intoxicating chemical compounds known as synthetic
drugs; and,
2. Direct staff to return to the Council in six months with an
update report.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
Mayor O’Malley recessed the meeting at 7:42 p.m.
Mayor O’Malley reconvened the meeting at 7:52 p.m.
2. Confirming the Cost of Vegetative Growth/Refuse Abatement
Ex Parte Communications:
Fiscal Impact: The City will receive $43,312.50 from the 2014/2015
property tax rolls in weed abatement / refuse abatement assessments.
Recommendation: Council adopt the Draft Resolution, confirming the
cost of vegetative growth (weeds) and/or refuse (rubbish) abatement.
[Fire]
Fire Chief Kurt Stone gave the staff report and answered questions from the Council.
Ex Parte Communications: None
PUBLIC COMMENT: None
MOTION: By Council Member Kelley and seconded by Council Member
Fonzi to adopt the Draft Resolution, confirming the cost of
vegetative growth (weeds) and/or refuse (rubbish) abatement.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Resolution No. 2014-
055)
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Atascadero City Council
August 12, 2014
Page 6 of 8
3. Title 3 Amendment - Cardroom Ordinance - Increase in the Maximum
Number of Card Tables - Removal of Betting Limits
Ex Parte Communications:
Fiscal Impact: The amendment should have a modest positive fiscal
impact on the City.
Recommendation: Council introduce for first reading, by title only, Draft
Ordinance A amending the City’s Cardroom Ordinance. [Community
Development]
Community Development Director Warren Frace gave the staff report and answered
questions from the Council.
Ex Parte Communications
Mayor O’Malley spoke to Dan Delaney
PUBLIC COMMENT:
The following citizens spoke on this item: Dora Brown, Dan Delaney, Ed Veek, Mike
Jackson, Jamie Kirk and Farah Vadido.
Mayor O’Malley closed the Public Comment period.
Council Member Fonzi stated that she could not support this recommendation due to
the removal of the $500 betting limit.
MOTION: By Council Member Kelley and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Sturtevant to introduce for first reading, by title only, Draft
Ordinance A amending the City’s Cardroom Ordinance.
Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Fonzi opposed)
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Pending General Plan Amendment - Request for Authorization to
Process PLN 2009-1346 - Halcon Road / Viejo Camino -
(ConsciousBuild Atascadero, LLC / Melhouse / Kirk Consulting)
Fiscal Impact: If the project is approved for processing, it should be
required to be fiscally neutral so the added residential units fund their o wn
on-site improvements and maintenance, as well as their fair share of off -
site improvements and impacts to City emergency services.
Recommendation: Council adopt Draft Resolution A authorizing staff to
process a proposed General Plan Amendment application with the
requirement the applicant will be responsible for full staff and/or consultant
costs to process the application. [Community Development]
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Atascadero City Council
August 12, 2014
Page 7 of 8
Community Development Director Warren Frace gave the staff report and answered
questions from the Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
The following citizens spoke on this item: Jamie Kirk, Joseph Massinio, Steve Hughes,
Chris Berry, and Andrew Goodwin.
Mayor O’Malley closed the Public Comment period.
Mayor O’Malley recessed the meeting at 9:43 p.m.
Mayor O’Malley reconvened the meeting at 9:52 p.m.
Council listed their concerns with staff that they want to be addressed in this process.
MOTION: By Council Member Fonzi and seconded by Council Member
Kelley to adopt Draft Resolution A authorizing staff to process
a proposed General Plan Amendment application with the
requirement the applicant will be responsible for full staff
and/or consultant costs to process the application, and
addressing the concerns of the Council.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Resolution No. 2014-
056)
2. Ap proval of Draft Resolution Authorizing a Master Agreement Between
the City of Atascadero and the Successor Agency to the Community
Redevelopment Agency of Atascadero
Fiscal Impact: The fiscal impact of this agreement is unknown at this time.
Any expenditures made as a result of the Master Agreement would be
paid using restricted bond proceeds pursuant to bond covenants.
Recommendation: City Council approve the Draft Resolution authorizing
a Master Agreement between the City of Atascadero and the Successor
Agency to expend excess bond proceeds. [Administrative Services]
Deputy Administrative Services Director Cindy Chavez gave the staff report and
answered questions from the Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT: None
MOTION: By Council Member Moreno and seconded by Council Member
Fonzi to approve the Draft Resolution authorizing a Master
Agreement between the City of Atascadero and the Successor
Agency to expend excess bond proceeds.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Resolution No. 2014-
057)
ITEM NUMBER: A-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Atascadero City Council
August 12, 2014
Page 8 of 8
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: None
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS:
Mayor O’Malley
1. SLO Council of Governments (SLOCOG) – extension of grant money for
Highway 41 pathways, and Del Rio interchange made it to the 2 nd tier list for
future projects.
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND / OR ACTION: None
F. ADJOURNMENT TO THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF ATASCADERO
Mayor O’Malley adjourned the meeting at 10:39 p.m.
MINUTES PREPARED BY:
______________________________________
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C.
City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager
The following exhibit is available for review in the City Clerk’s office:
Exhibit A – 8/7/14 Bid Summary for Exterior Lighting Fixtures & Bulbs Equipment Purchase
ITEM NUMBER: A-2
DATE: 09/09/14
Check
Number
Check
Date Vendor Description Amount
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of June 2014
141568 06/05/2014 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION 40.00Payroll Vendor Payment
141569 06/05/2014 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS 1,229.50Payroll Vendor Payment
141570 06/05/2014 ATASCADERO PROF. FIREFIGHTERS 695.53Payroll Vendor Payment
141571 06/05/2014 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC.2,038.78Payroll Vendor Payment
141572 06/05/2014 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 9,042.69Payroll Vendor Payment
141573 06/05/2014 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 801.28Payroll Vendor Payment
141574 06/05/2014 SEIU LOCAL 620 784.60Payroll Vendor Payment
141575 06/05/2014 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 288.29Payroll Vendor Payment
141576 06/05/2014 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 2,663.79Payroll Vendor Payment
1628 06/06/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 35,537.86Payroll Vendor Payment
1629 06/06/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 56,053.76Payroll Vendor Payment
1630 06/06/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 95.97Payroll Vendor Payment
1631 06/06/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 389.85Payroll Vendor Payment
1632 06/06/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 1,524.12Payroll Vendor Payment
1633 06/06/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 989.25Payroll Vendor Payment
1634 06/06/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 1,568.77Payroll Vendor Payment
1635 06/06/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 2,360.03Payroll Vendor Payment
1636 06/06/2014 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 874.61Payroll Vendor Payment
141577 06/09/2014 ATASCADERO TRAFFIC WAY STORAGE 676.00Accounts Payable Check
141578 06/09/2014 U.S. POSTMASTER 200.00Accounts Payable Check
1637 06/10/2014 RABOBANK, N.A.43,766.10Payroll Vendor Payment
1638 06/10/2014 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT 10,761.25Payroll Vendor Payment
1639 06/10/2014 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT 995.35Payroll Vendor Payment
141579 06/13/2014 A & R CONSTRUCTION 1,286.00Accounts Payable Check
141580 06/13/2014 A.D. STARR 1,489.77Accounts Payable Check
141581 06/13/2014 KEITH AGGSON 77.00Accounts Payable Check
141582 06/13/2014 AGP VIDEO, INC.2,770.00Accounts Payable Check
141583 06/13/2014 ALAMEDA ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTOR 149.97Accounts Payable Check
141584 06/13/2014 MARITZA ALMQUIST 20.41Accounts Payable Check
141585 06/13/2014 ALTHOUSE & MEADE, INC.3,527.49Accounts Payable Check
141586 06/13/2014 AMERICAN SOCCER COMPANY, INC.169.73Accounts Payable Check
141587 06/13/2014 AMERICAN WEST TIRE & AUTO INC 1,122.73Accounts Payable Check
141588 06/13/2014 AMI PIPE & SUPPLY, INC.139.89Accounts Payable Check
141589 06/13/2014 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS 848.15Accounts Payable Check
ITEM NUMBER: A-2
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHEMENT: 1
Check
Number
Check
Date Vendor Description Amount
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of June 2014
141591 06/13/2014 AT&T 614.94Accounts Payable Check
141592 06/13/2014 ATASCADERO HAY & FEED 867.00Accounts Payable Check
141593 06/13/2014 ATASCADERO NEWS 916.70Accounts Payable Check
141594 06/13/2014 ATASCADERO RADIATOR, INC.45.00Accounts Payable Check
141595 06/13/2014 ATD, INC.1,120.00Accounts Payable Check
141596 06/13/2014 BASSETT'S CRICKET RANCH,INC.293.31Accounts Payable Check
141597 06/13/2014 BATTERY SYSTEMS 171.06Accounts Payable Check
141598 06/13/2014 BERRY MAN, INC.915.95Accounts Payable Check
141599 06/13/2014 JOHN BLAIR 145.00Accounts Payable Check
141600 06/13/2014 SHIRLEY R. BRUTON 416.70Accounts Payable Check
141601 06/13/2014 C & H CYCLES 489.99Accounts Payable Check
141602 06/13/2014 CA CODE CHECK, INC.10,390.62Accounts Payable Check
141603 06/13/2014 KATE CAPELA 51.95Accounts Payable Check
141604 06/13/2014 CENTRAL VALLEY TOXICOLOGY,INC.65.00Accounts Payable Check
141605 06/13/2014 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 985.94Accounts Payable Check
141606 06/13/2014 CHEVRON & TEXACO BUS. CARD 917.46Accounts Payable Check
141607 06/13/2014 KATHLEEN J. CINOWALT 209.30Accounts Payable Check
141608 06/13/2014 CITY OF ATASCADERO 360.00Accounts Payable Check
141609 06/13/2014 COAST ELECTRONICS 15,465.25Accounts Payable Check
141610 06/13/2014 COBAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.859.50Accounts Payable Check
141611 06/13/2014 CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS, LLC.125.00Accounts Payable Check
141612 06/13/2014 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.603.17Accounts Payable Check
141613 06/13/2014 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER 64.54Accounts Payable Check
141614 06/13/2014 DAKOS LAND SURVEYS, INC.500.00Accounts Payable Check
141615 06/13/2014 BRIAN S. DAVIN, JR.306.00Accounts Payable Check
141616 06/13/2014 DANIEL A. DAVIS 455.00Accounts Payable Check
141617 06/13/2014 DIGITAL MARKETING ZONE 27.50Accounts Payable Check
141618 06/13/2014 DOCUTEAM 110.40Accounts Payable Check
141619 06/13/2014 EL CAMINO CAR WASH 19.99Accounts Payable Check
141620 06/13/2014 EL CAMINO VETERINARY HOSP 381.19Accounts Payable Check
141621 06/13/2014 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS 147.87Accounts Payable Check
141622 06/13/2014 ESCUELA DEL RIO 360.00Accounts Payable Check
141623 06/13/2014 FEDERAL EXPRESS 115.60Accounts Payable Check
141624 06/13/2014 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL 144.00Accounts Payable Check
141625 06/13/2014 FIRST TRANSIT, INC.19,981.74Accounts Payable Check
141626 06/13/2014 FLYMEAT.COM 81.40Accounts Payable Check
141627 06/13/2014 FOOD FOR LESS 157.92Accounts Payable Check
ITEM NUMBER: A-2
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHEMENT: 1
Check
Number
Check
Date Vendor Description Amount
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of June 2014
141628 06/13/2014 WARREN FRACE 300.00Accounts Payable Check
141629 06/13/2014 GARCIA'S RESTAURANT 17.40Accounts Payable Check
141630 06/13/2014 GAS COMPANY 1,002.03Accounts Payable Check
141631 06/13/2014 GEM AUTO PARTS 196.25Accounts Payable Check
141632 06/13/2014 GIBBS INTERNATIONAL, INC.265.74Accounts Payable Check
141633 06/13/2014 GOLDEN STATE COPIER & MAILING 60.99Accounts Payable Check
141634 06/13/2014 GSA - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 613.59Accounts Payable Check
141635 06/13/2014 BRADLEY A. HACKLEMAN 740.40Accounts Payable Check
141636 06/13/2014 CHRISTOPHER HALL 51.00Accounts Payable Check
141637 06/13/2014 RALPH DOUGLAS HARBOTTLE 233.10Accounts Payable Check
141638 06/13/2014 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT & COPY 410.85Accounts Payable Check
141639 06/13/2014 CHRISTOPHER HESTER 98.81Accounts Payable Check
141640 06/13/2014 CHRIS HOREJSI 140.39Accounts Payable Check
141641 06/13/2014 INGLIS PET HOTEL 146.20Accounts Payable Check
141642 06/13/2014 INHOUSE SECURITY SERVICE, LLC 1,040.63Accounts Payable Check
141643 06/13/2014 THE INK CO.117.18Accounts Payable Check
141644 06/13/2014 INTOXIMETERS 96.72Accounts Payable Check
141645 06/13/2014 J. CARROLL CORPORATION 614.66Accounts Payable Check
141646 06/13/2014 CAROL D. JANSSEN 235.80Accounts Payable Check
141647 06/13/2014 JOE A. GONSALVES & SON 3,000.00Accounts Payable Check
141648 06/13/2014 JOEL SWITZER DIESEL REPAIR,INC 1,140.95Accounts Payable Check
141649 06/13/2014 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES, INC.701.89Accounts Payable Check
141650 06/13/2014 KABOOM INSTANT RODENT CONTROL 150.00Accounts Payable Check
141651 06/13/2014 KPRL 1230 AM 320.00Accounts Payable Check
141652 06/13/2014 ANDY C. LARA 36.00Accounts Payable Check
141653 06/13/2014 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 400.00Accounts Payable Check
141654 06/13/2014 DEBRA K. LEASURE 250.00Accounts Payable Check
141655 06/13/2014 LIFE ASSIST, INC.273.75Accounts Payable Check
141656 06/13/2014 THOMAS LITTLE 281.00Accounts Payable Check
141657 06/13/2014 CRAIG C. LOWRIE 100.00Accounts Payable Check
141658 06/13/2014 ANDREW LUERA 281.00Accounts Payable Check
141659 06/13/2014 M.J. BERTACCINI & ASSOCIATES 2,240.00Accounts Payable Check
141660 06/13/2014 MADRONE LANDSCAPES, INC.1,408.00Accounts Payable Check
141661 06/13/2014 MAUL PLUMBING 1,870.92Accounts Payable Check
141662 06/13/2014 BECKY MAXWELL 45.70Accounts Payable Check
141663 06/13/2014 MEDWORKS MEDICAL CENTER 765.00Accounts Payable Check
141664 06/13/2014 MICHAEL BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES 3,000.00Accounts Payable Check
ITEM NUMBER: A-2
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHEMENT: 1
Check
Number
Check
Date Vendor Description Amount
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of June 2014
141665 06/13/2014 MICHAEL K. NUNLEY & ASSC, INC.9,008.45Accounts Payable Check
141666 06/13/2014 MID-COAST MOWER & SAW, INC.142.87Accounts Payable Check
141667 06/13/2014 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE 608.00Accounts Payable Check
141668 06/13/2014 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 266.65Accounts Payable Check
141669 06/13/2014 REON C MONSON 267.00Accounts Payable Check
141670 06/13/2014 HEATHER MORENO 89.60Accounts Payable Check
141671 06/13/2014 NATIONAL FIRE FIGHTER CORP.232.65Accounts Payable Check
141672 06/13/2014 NAVAJO ROCK & BLOCK 495.00Accounts Payable Check
141673 06/13/2014 PAUL NETZ 281.00Accounts Payable Check
141674 06/13/2014 OFFICE DEPOT INC.1,397.18Accounts Payable Check
141675 06/13/2014 THOMAS P. O'MALLEY 89.60Accounts Payable Check
141676 06/13/2014 PACIFIC COAST GYMNASTICS CENTE 20.48Accounts Payable Check
141679 06/13/2014 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 49,418.41Accounts Payable Check
141680 06/13/2014 PASO ROBLES FORD LINCOLN MERC 64.61Accounts Payable Check
141681 06/13/2014 DEAN PERICIC 281.00Accounts Payable Check
141682 06/13/2014 PETERSON U-CART 670.80Accounts Payable Check
141683 06/13/2014 PH&S PRODUCTS, LLC 300.00Accounts Payable Check
141684 06/13/2014 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY,INC.352.51Accounts Payable Check
141685 06/13/2014 PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER 186.06Accounts Payable Check
141686 06/13/2014 RANGE MASTER 702.00Accounts Payable Check
141687 06/13/2014 JERI RANGEL 300.00Accounts Payable Check
141688 06/13/2014 RECOGNITION WORKS 4.57Accounts Payable Check
141689 06/13/2014 RACHELLE RICKARD 500.00Accounts Payable Check
141690 06/13/2014 RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC.750.00Accounts Payable Check
141691 06/13/2014 ROB DAVIS BACKHOE 8,400.00Accounts Payable Check
141692 06/13/2014 CHRISTOPHER R. ROBINSON 281.00Accounts Payable Check
141693 06/13/2014 SAN LUIS POWERHOUSE, INC.404.39Accounts Payable Check
141694 06/13/2014 SENSATIONS APPAREL 535.47Accounts Payable Check
141695 06/13/2014 SERVICE SYSTEMS ASSC, INC.2,000.00Accounts Payable Check
141696 06/13/2014 SHELL 1,515.83Accounts Payable Check
141697 06/13/2014 SHORIN-RYU KARATE 311.50Accounts Payable Check
141698 06/13/2014 JOHN C. SIEMENS 196.35Accounts Payable Check
141699 06/13/2014 SIGNS OF SUCCESS, INC.4,243.03Accounts Payable Check
141700 06/13/2014 SLO COUNTY NEWSPAPERS-TRIBUNE 411.00Accounts Payable Check
141701 06/13/2014 SLO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 106.00Accounts Payable Check
141702 06/13/2014 DELORES P. SOTO 216.00Accounts Payable Check
141703 06/13/2014 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY 523.58Accounts Payable Check
ITEM NUMBER: A-2
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHEMENT: 1
Check
Number
Check
Date Vendor Description Amount
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of June 2014
141704 06/13/2014 STATE WATER RES CONTROL BOARD 340.00Accounts Payable Check
141705 06/13/2014 KURT W. STONE 77.00Accounts Payable Check
141706 06/13/2014 BRIAN STURTEVANT 99.60Accounts Payable Check
141707 06/13/2014 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL 3,951.00Accounts Payable Check
141708 06/13/2014 SUPERIOR CRANE & TRANSPORT 264.00Accounts Payable Check
141709 06/13/2014 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS 427.33Accounts Payable Check
141710 06/13/2014 RUSS THOMPSON 270.00Accounts Payable Check
141711 06/13/2014 MARCIA TORGERSON 384.92Accounts Payable Check
141712 06/13/2014 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE(CMRS-FP)5,000.00Accounts Payable Check
141713 06/13/2014 ULTREX BUSINESS PRODUCTS 7.00Accounts Payable Check
141714 06/13/2014 UNITED STAFFING ASSC., INC.2,613.60Accounts Payable Check
141715 06/13/2014 VERIZON WIRELESS 1,472.53Accounts Payable Check
141716 06/13/2014 VIBORG SAND & GRAVEL, INC.66,508.86Accounts Payable Check
141717 06/13/2014 WELL SEEN SIGN CO., LLC 1,564.00Accounts Payable Check
141718 06/13/2014 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY 185.72Accounts Payable Check
141719 06/13/2014 WEX BANK - 76 UNIVERSL 13,664.26Accounts Payable Check
141720 06/13/2014 WONDRIES FLEET GROUP 25,156.55Accounts Payable Check
141721 06/13/2014 KAREN B. WYKE 513.90Accounts Payable Check
141722 06/13/2014 ZOO MED LABORATORIES, INC.389.75Accounts Payable Check
141723 06/19/2014 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION 40.00Payroll Vendor Payment
141724 06/19/2014 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS 1,271.75Payroll Vendor Payment
141725 06/19/2014 ATASCADERO PROF. FIREFIGHTERS 695.53Payroll Vendor Payment
141726 06/19/2014 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC.2,038.78Payroll Vendor Payment
141727 06/19/2014 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC.125.00Payroll Vendor Payment
141728 06/19/2014 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 9,042.69Payroll Vendor Payment
141729 06/19/2014 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 824.92Payroll Vendor Payment
141730 06/19/2014 SEIU LOCAL 620 812.09Payroll Vendor Payment
141731 06/19/2014 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 288.29Payroll Vendor Payment
141732 06/19/2014 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 2,663.79Payroll Vendor Payment
1640 06/20/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 35,845.16Payroll Vendor Payment
1641 06/20/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 56,654.75Payroll Vendor Payment
1642 06/20/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 120.98Payroll Vendor Payment
1643 06/20/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 469.17Payroll Vendor Payment
1644 06/20/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 1,524.12Payroll Vendor Payment
1645 06/20/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 991.46Payroll Vendor Payment
1646 06/20/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 1,568.77Payroll Vendor Payment
ITEM NUMBER: A-2
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHEMENT: 1
Check
Number
Check
Date Vendor Description Amount
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of June 2014
1647 06/20/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 2,413.28Payroll Vendor Payment
1648 06/20/2014 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 874.61Payroll Vendor Payment
1649 06/24/2014 RABOBANK, N.A.41,114.64Payroll Vendor Payment
1650 06/24/2014 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT 9,785.85Payroll Vendor Payment
1651 06/24/2014 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT 1,007.88Payroll Vendor Payment
141736 06/24/2014 U.S. BANK 21,135.15Accounts Payable Check
141737 06/24/2014 ALLSTATE WORKPLACE DIVISION 2,641.81Payroll Vendor Payment
141738 06/24/2014 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 130,972.99Payroll Vendor Payment
141739 06/24/2014 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS CO 888.21Payroll Vendor Payment
141740 06/24/2014 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES 1,670.24Payroll Vendor Payment
141741 06/24/2014 PREFERRED BENEFITS INSURANCE 9,802.51Payroll Vendor Payment
141742 06/27/2014 MATTHEW R. AANERUD 50.00Accounts Payable Check
141743 06/27/2014 KATHRYN ACOSTA 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141744 06/27/2014 ADVANCED SEPTIC & SEWER SVC 885.00Accounts Payable Check
141745 06/27/2014 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.1,433.70Accounts Payable Check
141746 06/27/2014 AIRFLOW FILTER SERVICE, INC.244.27Accounts Payable Check
141747 06/27/2014 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC 141.00Accounts Payable Check
141748 06/27/2014 ALPHA FIRE SPRINKLER CORP.27,506.30Accounts Payable Check
141749 06/27/2014 AMERICAN MARBORG 107.25Accounts Payable Check
141750 06/27/2014 AMERICAN WEST TIRE & AUTO INC 3,421.38Accounts Payable Check
141751 06/27/2014 ANGEL MEMORIAL GRANITES 2,627.50Accounts Payable Check
141752 06/27/2014 KELLY AREBALO 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141753 06/27/2014 A-STITCH EMBROIDERY 612.00Accounts Payable Check
141755 06/27/2014 AT&T 1,153.88Accounts Payable Check
141756 06/27/2014 AT&T 732.76Accounts Payable Check
141757 06/27/2014 ATASCADERO NEWS 1,120.00Accounts Payable Check
141758 06/27/2014 ATD, INC.179.00Accounts Payable Check
141759 06/27/2014 AURORA WORLD, INC.996.33Accounts Payable Check
141760 06/27/2014 BARRY-OWEN CO., INC.159.14Accounts Payable Check
141761 06/27/2014 BATTERY SYSTEMS 67.90Accounts Payable Check
141762 06/27/2014 ALI BOWMAN 68.50Accounts Payable Check
141763 06/27/2014 BRADS OVERHEAD DOORS, INC.420.00Accounts Payable Check
141764 06/27/2014 AARON BROWN 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141765 06/27/2014 CASEY BRYSON 172.00Accounts Payable Check
141766 06/27/2014 BURTON'S FIRE, INC.4,032.52Accounts Payable Check
141767 06/27/2014 C & H CYCLES 80.00Accounts Payable Check
ITEM NUMBER: A-2
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHEMENT: 1
Check
Number
Check
Date Vendor Description Amount
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of June 2014
141768 06/27/2014 CA CODE CHECK, INC.8,804.67Accounts Payable Check
141769 06/27/2014 CANNON 728.30Accounts Payable Check
141770 06/27/2014 JASON F. CARR 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141771 06/27/2014 CENTRAL VALLEY TOXICOLOGY,INC.215.00Accounts Payable Check
141772 06/27/2014 MATTHEW L. CHESSON 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141773 06/27/2014 KAREN A. CLANIN 165.34Accounts Payable Check
141774 06/27/2014 CO OF SAN LUIS OBISPO SART PRG 1,500.00Accounts Payable Check
141775 06/27/2014 COAST LINE DISTRIBUTING 1,288.72Accounts Payable Check
141776 06/27/2014 COASTAL COPY, LP 328.52Accounts Payable Check
141777 06/27/2014 COLE-PARMER 794.68Accounts Payable Check
141778 06/27/2014 COLONY AUTO SERVICE, INC.330.20Accounts Payable Check
141779 06/27/2014 JOHN COUCH 600.00Accounts Payable Check
141780 06/27/2014 COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 50.00Accounts Payable Check
141781 06/27/2014 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER 135.10Accounts Payable Check
141782 06/27/2014 CULLIGAN/CENTRAL COAST WTR TRT 70.00Accounts Payable Check
141783 06/27/2014 MATTHEW J. CURRY 140.00Accounts Payable Check
141784 06/27/2014 D4 ELECTRIC 794.57Accounts Payable Check
141785 06/27/2014 BRIAN S. DAVIN, JR.288.00Accounts Payable Check
141786 06/27/2014 CALEB M. DAVIS 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141787 06/27/2014 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 113.00Accounts Payable Check
141788 06/27/2014 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2,025.81Accounts Payable Check
141789 06/27/2014 CHARLES DICKEY 44.80Accounts Payable Check
141790 06/27/2014 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES INC 1,496.63Accounts Payable Check
141791 06/27/2014 KELLI M. DOWNS 1,747.20Accounts Payable Check
141792 06/27/2014 ELECTRICRAFT, INC.281.70Accounts Payable Check
141793 06/27/2014 RYAN ENFANTINO 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141794 06/27/2014 EQ-WINE COVERS COMPANY 2,666.00Accounts Payable Check
141795 06/27/2014 KEITH J. FALERIOS 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141796 06/27/2014 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR 573.50Accounts Payable Check
141797 06/27/2014 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL 72.00Accounts Payable Check
141798 06/27/2014 BRYAN FINDLAY 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141799 06/27/2014 FOOD FOR LESS 29.92Accounts Payable Check
141800 06/27/2014 FP MAILING SOLUTIONS 341.85Accounts Payable Check
141801 06/27/2014 GAS COMPANY 250.76Accounts Payable Check
141802 06/27/2014 GEM AUTO PARTS 1,194.31Accounts Payable Check
141803 06/27/2014 CHRISTOPHER HALL 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141804 06/27/2014 AYLA HALLDIN 115.00Accounts Payable Check
ITEM NUMBER: A-2
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHEMENT: 1
Check
Number
Check
Date Vendor Description Amount
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of June 2014
141805 06/27/2014 ROCHELLE O. HANSON 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141806 06/27/2014 CHRISTOPHER HESTER 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141807 06/27/2014 ANN HOCHSTETLER 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141808 06/27/2014 EVELYN R. INGRAM 480.77Accounts Payable Check
141809 06/27/2014 J. CARROLL CORPORATION 452.84Accounts Payable Check
141810 06/27/2014 ZACHARIAH JACKSON 290.00Accounts Payable Check
141811 06/27/2014 JK'S UNLIMITED 4,002.28Accounts Payable Check
141812 06/27/2014 BOB JOSLIN 145.00Accounts Payable Check
141813 06/27/2014 K & M INTERNATIONAL 1,769.75Accounts Payable Check
141814 06/27/2014 KARP LAND SURVEYS 4,170.00Accounts Payable Check
141815 06/27/2014 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER 4,279.10Accounts Payable Check
141816 06/27/2014 KW CONSTRUCTION 15,000.00Accounts Payable Check
141817 06/27/2014 LANTERN PRESS 29.32Accounts Payable Check
141818 06/27/2014 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO. INC 3,995.01Accounts Payable Check
141819 06/27/2014 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION 600.00Accounts Payable Check
141820 06/27/2014 ANDREW M. LUCAS 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141821 06/27/2014 ANDREW LUERA 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141822 06/27/2014 MADRONE LANDSCAPES, INC.6,931.28Accounts Payable Check
141823 06/27/2014 GREGG T. MEYER 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141824 06/27/2014 MID-COAST MOWER & SAW, INC.407.66Accounts Payable Check
141825 06/27/2014 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE 525.32Accounts Payable Check
141826 06/27/2014 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 392.00Accounts Payable Check
141827 06/27/2014 BRETT MOBLEY 110.00Accounts Payable Check
141828 06/27/2014 RAYMOND ROBERT MOLLE 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141829 06/27/2014 NATIONAL FIRE FIGHTER CORP.2,949.80Accounts Payable Check
141830 06/27/2014 KELLYE R. NETZ 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141831 06/27/2014 CLINT NICHOLSON 30.00Accounts Payable Check
141832 06/27/2014 NORTH COAST ENGINEERING INC.5,197.25Accounts Payable Check
141833 06/27/2014 OFFICE DEPOT INC.1,028.21Accounts Payable Check
141834 06/27/2014 ANJANETTE ORDONEZ 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141835 06/27/2014 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, INC.22.87Accounts Payable Check
141836 06/27/2014 RACHELLE PARIS 21.76Accounts Payable Check
141837 06/27/2014 PENFIELD & SMITH ENGINEERS INC 1,187.50Accounts Payable Check
141838 06/27/2014 PERRY'S PARCEL & GIFT 542.45Accounts Payable Check
141839 06/27/2014 PH&S PRODUCTS, LLC 300.00Accounts Payable Check
141840 06/27/2014 PHILLIPS INTERNATIONAL, INC.87.24Accounts Payable Check
141841 06/27/2014 SCOTT E. PIPAN 120.00Accounts Payable Check
ITEM NUMBER: A-2
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHEMENT: 1
Check
Number
Check
Date Vendor Description Amount
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of June 2014
141842 06/27/2014 JENNIFER PRINCE 61.50Accounts Payable Check
141843 06/27/2014 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY,INC.178.22Accounts Payable Check
141844 06/27/2014 PTL ENTERPRISES 106.20Accounts Payable Check
141845 06/27/2014 RAIN FOR RENT BAKERSFIELD 11,269.29Accounts Payable Check
141846 06/27/2014 BILL RAINWATER 145.00Accounts Payable Check
141847 06/27/2014 BRANDON ROBERTS 225.00Accounts Payable Check
141848 06/27/2014 CHRISTOPHER R. ROBINSON 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141849 06/27/2014 SAMUEL RODRIGUEZ 5.00Accounts Payable Check
141850 06/27/2014 ROLSON MUSIC & SOUND 350.00Accounts Payable Check
141851 06/27/2014 REBECCA ROMERO 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141852 06/27/2014 ROSSI TRANSPORT SERVICE 370.88Accounts Payable Check
141853 06/27/2014 ERIN RUSSELL 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141854 06/27/2014 SAWDEY'S, INC.2,531.88Accounts Payable Check
141855 06/27/2014 MICHELE SCHAMBER 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141856 06/27/2014 DIEGO SEGOVIA 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141857 06/27/2014 SCOTT SIMONS 145.00Accounts Payable Check
141858 06/27/2014 RYAN SLOAN 85.00Accounts Payable Check
141859 06/27/2014 DELORES P. SOTO 234.00Accounts Payable Check
141860 06/27/2014 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 2,694.18Accounts Payable Check
141861 06/27/2014 STEPHEN JOSEPH 86.94Accounts Payable Check
141862 06/27/2014 STEVEN STUCKY 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141863 06/27/2014 SUPERIOR CRANE & TRANSPORT 264.00Accounts Payable Check
141864 06/27/2014 JOHN W. TAYLOR 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141865 06/27/2014 TESCO CONTROLS, INC.49,350.00Accounts Payable Check
141866 06/27/2014 TEXAS REFINERY CORP.1,450.28Accounts Payable Check
141867 06/27/2014 KELLY THOMPSON 55.20Accounts Payable Check
141868 06/27/2014 JANET TINGLEY 567.00Accounts Payable Check
141869 06/27/2014 TOYSMITH 284.40Accounts Payable Check
141870 06/27/2014 ANTHONY J. TRAVERSO 72.00Accounts Payable Check
141871 06/27/2014 TY, INC.437.88Accounts Payable Check
141872 06/27/2014 ULTREX BUSINESS PRODUCTS 890.34Accounts Payable Check
141873 06/27/2014 UNITED STAFFING ASSC., INC.792.00Accounts Payable Check
141874 06/27/2014 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS 12,555.46Accounts Payable Check
141875 06/27/2014 IWINA M. VAN BEEK 114.00Accounts Payable Check
141876 06/27/2014 TYSON VAN HORN 75.31Accounts Payable Check
141877 06/27/2014 RENE VASQUEZ 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141878 06/27/2014 VERDIN 442.70Accounts Payable Check
ITEM NUMBER: A-2
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHEMENT: 1
Check
Number
Check
Date Vendor Description Amount
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of June 2014
141879 06/27/2014 VERIZON WIRELESS 335.34Accounts Payable Check
141880 06/27/2014 VIBORG SAND & GRAVEL, INC.9,070.40Accounts Payable Check
141881 06/27/2014 WALLACE GROUP 10,866.95Accounts Payable Check
141882 06/27/2014 WARM FUZZY TOYS 348.41Accounts Payable Check
141883 06/27/2014 WILLIAM P. WHITE 300.00Accounts Payable Check
141884 06/27/2014 JEFF WILSHUSEN 120.00Accounts Payable Check
141885 06/27/2014 ISRAEL WINGATE 145.00Accounts Payable Check
141886 06/27/2014 WISHPETS CO.167.38Accounts Payable Check
$ 1,051,149.05
ITEM NUMBER: A-2
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHEMENT: 1
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
DATE: 09/09/14
Check
Number
Check
Date Vendor Description Amount
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of July 2014
141887 07/03/2014 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC 1,369.00Accounts Payable Check
141888 07/03/2014 ATASCADERO TRAFFIC WAY STORAGE 676.00Accounts Payable Check
141889 07/03/2014 JUSTIN BLACK 178.00Accounts Payable Check
141890 07/03/2014 DANIEL E. ERNST 250.00Accounts Payable Check
141891 07/03/2014 WARREN FRACE 300.00Accounts Payable Check
141892 07/03/2014 PROGRESSIVE SOLUTIONS, INC.5,638.15Accounts Payable Check
141893 07/03/2014 JERI RANGEL 300.00Accounts Payable Check
141894 07/03/2014 RACHELLE RICKARD 500.00Accounts Payable Check
141895 07/03/2014 JAMES SCOOLIS 250.00Accounts Payable Check
141896 07/03/2014 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION 40.00Payroll Vendor Payment
141897 07/03/2014 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS 1,314.00Payroll Vendor Payment
141898 07/03/2014 ATASCADERO PROF. FIREFIGHTERS 695.53Payroll Vendor Payment
141899 07/03/2014 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC.2,038.78Payroll Vendor Payment
141900 07/03/2014 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 25,442.69Payroll Vendor Payment
141901 07/03/2014 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 1,407.11Payroll Vendor Payment
141902 07/03/2014 SEIU LOCAL 620 829.28Payroll Vendor Payment
141903 07/03/2014 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 288.29Payroll Vendor Payment
141904 07/03/2014 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 2,663.79Payroll Vendor Payment
1652 07/07/2014 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 874.61Payroll Vendor Payment
1653 07/08/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 36,285.20Payroll Vendor Payment
1654 07/08/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 55,829.68Payroll Vendor Payment
1655 07/08/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 69.96Payroll Vendor Payment
1656 07/08/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 446.62Payroll Vendor Payment
1657 07/08/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 2,496.02Payroll Vendor Payment
1658 07/08/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 977.40Payroll Vendor Payment
1659 07/08/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 1,568.77Payroll Vendor Payment
1660 07/08/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 2,434.32Payroll Vendor Payment
1661 07/08/2014 RABOBANK, N.A.51,854.25Payroll Vendor Payment
1662 07/08/2014 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT 13,081.72Payroll Vendor Payment
1663 07/08/2014 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT 1,078.59Payroll Vendor Payment
141905 07/11/2014 AIR-RITE REFRIGERATION 4,177.94Accounts Payable Check
141906 07/11/2014 ALL SIGNS AND GRAPHICS, LLC 962.13Accounts Payable Check
141907 07/11/2014 ALTHOUSE & MEADE, INC.541.81Accounts Payable Check
141908 07/11/2014 AMERICAN FLAG AND GIFTS 378.39Accounts Payable Check
141909 07/11/2014 AMERICAN WEST TIRE & AUTO INC 852.77Accounts Payable Check
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
Check
Number
Check
Date Vendor Description Amount
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of July 2014
141910 07/11/2014 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS 97.80Accounts Payable Check
141911 07/11/2014 AT&T 82.85Accounts Payable Check
141912 07/11/2014 AT&T 202.50Accounts Payable Check
141913 07/11/2014 ATASCADERO 76 36.62Accounts Payable Check
141914 07/11/2014 ATASCADERO GIRLS SOFTBALL 935.00Accounts Payable Check
141915 07/11/2014 ATASCADERO HAY & FEED 1,380.17Accounts Payable Check
141917 07/11/2014 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO.24,249.55Accounts Payable Check
141918 07/11/2014 ATASCADERO NEWS 1,147.30Accounts Payable Check
141919 07/11/2014 ATASCADERO UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST 2,700.00Accounts Payable Check
141920 07/11/2014 ATASCADERO YOUTH FOOTBALL 1,137.50Accounts Payable Check
141921 07/11/2014 ATASCADERO YOUTH SOCCER ASSC 2,087.50Accounts Payable Check
141922 07/11/2014 DAVID ATHEY 3.00Accounts Payable Check
141923 07/11/2014 BASSETT'S CRICKET RANCH,INC.205.56Accounts Payable Check
141924 07/11/2014 BAUER COMPRESSORS 1,573.62Accounts Payable Check
141925 07/11/2014 BERRY MAN, INC.986.65Accounts Payable Check
141926 07/11/2014 GREGORY A. BRAZZI 30.00Accounts Payable Check
141927 07/11/2014 LORI BRICKEY 15.34Accounts Payable Check
141928 07/11/2014 SHIRLEY R. BRUTON 435.60Accounts Payable Check
141929 07/11/2014 BURTON'S FIRE, INC.19,163.11Accounts Payable Check
141930 07/11/2014 CA CODE CHECK, INC.8,349.81Accounts Payable Check
141931 07/11/2014 CAL-COAST REFRIGERATION, INC 2,831.82Accounts Payable Check
141932 07/11/2014 CALPORTLAND COMPANY 5,510.97Accounts Payable Check
141933 07/11/2014 JIM CAMPANA 145.00Accounts Payable Check
141934 07/11/2014 CENTRAL COAST R & R LOCK 34.56Accounts Payable Check
141935 07/11/2014 CHEVRON & TEXACO BUS. CARD 595.50Accounts Payable Check
141936 07/11/2014 KATHLEEN J. CINOWALT 115.50Accounts Payable Check
141937 07/11/2014 CITY OF ATASCADERO 1,444.08Accounts Payable Check
141938 07/11/2014 CO OF SAN LUIS OBISPO SART PRG 1,500.00Accounts Payable Check
141939 07/11/2014 COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 137.50Accounts Payable Check
141940 07/11/2014 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER 64.54Accounts Payable Check
141941 07/11/2014 BRIAN S. DAVIN, JR.144.00Accounts Payable Check
141942 07/11/2014 CHARLES DICKEY 145.00Accounts Payable Check
141943 07/11/2014 DOCUTEAM 115.73Accounts Payable Check
141944 07/11/2014 MONICA DOMINGUEZ 74.26Accounts Payable Check
141945 07/11/2014 KERRIN M. EDMONDS 60.00Accounts Payable Check
141946 07/11/2014 KEITH J. FALERIOS 51.00Accounts Payable Check
141947 07/11/2014 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY 42.08Accounts Payable Check
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
Check
Number
Check
Date Vendor Description Amount
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of July 2014
141948 07/11/2014 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR 243.00Accounts Payable Check
141949 07/11/2014 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL 458.00Accounts Payable Check
141950 07/11/2014 FILIPPONI & THOMPSON DRILLING 5,000.00Accounts Payable Check
141951 07/11/2014 BRYAN FINDLAY 170.80Accounts Payable Check
141952 07/11/2014 FLYMEAT.COM 46.20Accounts Payable Check
141953 07/11/2014 FP MAILING SOLUTIONS 341.85Accounts Payable Check
141954 07/11/2014 FRAZEE PAINT 9.66Accounts Payable Check
141955 07/11/2014 GAS COMPANY 329.00Accounts Payable Check
141956 07/11/2014 GEM AUTO PARTS 852.78Accounts Payable Check
141957 07/11/2014 GILBERT'S LANDSCAPES 407.91Accounts Payable Check
141958 07/11/2014 KELLY GLEASON 72.81Accounts Payable Check
141959 07/11/2014 GOLDING CONCRETE SAWING 475.00Accounts Payable Check
141960 07/11/2014 NATHAN B. GOOSSENS 28.00Accounts Payable Check
141961 07/11/2014 GSA - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 358.79Accounts Payable Check
141962 07/11/2014 BRUCE GUERIN 15.00Accounts Payable Check
141963 07/11/2014 BRADLEY A. HACKLEMAN 653.40Accounts Payable Check
141964 07/11/2014 HOBBY BODY & PAINT SHOP 750.00Accounts Payable Check
141965 07/11/2014 INHOUSE SECURITY SERVICE, LLC 759.38Accounts Payable Check
141966 07/11/2014 J. CARROLL CORPORATION 767.71Accounts Payable Check
141967 07/11/2014 CAROL D. JANSSEN 358.50Accounts Payable Check
141968 07/11/2014 JK'S UNLIMITED 181.56Accounts Payable Check
141969 07/11/2014 JOEL SWITZER DIESEL REPAIR,INC 675.76Accounts Payable Check
141970 07/11/2014 HAROLD A. JOHNSTON III 730.80Accounts Payable Check
141971 07/11/2014 K & M INTERNATIONAL 5,103.22Accounts Payable Check
141972 07/11/2014 KABOOM INSTANT RODENT CONTROL 150.00Accounts Payable Check
141973 07/11/2014 LASER TECHNOLOGY, INC.2,004.26Accounts Payable Check
141974 07/11/2014 LAYNE LABORATORIES, INC.867.59Accounts Payable Check
141975 07/11/2014 LEHIGH HANSON 2,878.58Accounts Payable Check
141976 07/11/2014 LIFE ASSIST, INC.1,967.55Accounts Payable Check
141977 07/11/2014 THOMAS LITTLE 130.00Accounts Payable Check
141978 07/11/2014 M.J. BERTACCINI & ASSOCIATES 4,795.00Accounts Payable Check
141979 07/11/2014 ANNETTE MANIER 12.88Accounts Payable Check
141980 07/11/2014 BECKY MAXWELL 22.85Accounts Payable Check
141981 07/11/2014 MEDPOST URGENT CARE-PASO ROBLE 730.00Accounts Payable Check
141982 07/11/2014 MICHAEL K. NUNLEY & ASSC, INC.18,471.95Accounts Payable Check
141983 07/11/2014 MID-COAST GEOTECHNICAL, INC.1,390.00Accounts Payable Check
141984 07/11/2014 MID-COAST MOWER & SAW, INC.441.91Accounts Payable Check
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
Check
Number
Check
Date Vendor Description Amount
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of July 2014
141985 07/11/2014 MID-STATE CONCRETE PRODUCTS 2,714.38Accounts Payable Check
141987 07/11/2014 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE 1,509.17Accounts Payable Check
141988 07/11/2014 MATTHEW J. MIRANDA 97.00Accounts Payable Check
141989 07/11/2014 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 293.68Accounts Payable Check
141990 07/11/2014 BRETT MOBLEY 51.00Accounts Payable Check
141991 07/11/2014 REON C MONSON 312.00Accounts Payable Check
141992 07/11/2014 EMILIE MORSE 3.92Accounts Payable Check
141993 07/11/2014 KATIE MULDER 85.61Accounts Payable Check
141994 07/11/2014 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY CO.32.22Accounts Payable Check
141995 07/11/2014 OFFICE DEPOT INC.635.26Accounts Payable Check
141996 07/11/2014 TARA ORLICK 47.04Accounts Payable Check
141997 07/11/2014 PACIFIC COAST GYMNASTICS CENTE 126.00Accounts Payable Check
142000 07/11/2014 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 49,845.53Accounts Payable Check
142001 07/11/2014 PARADISE COALITION, INC.667.80Accounts Payable Check
142002 07/11/2014 FLAVIA PAROTTI 94.70Accounts Payable Check
142003 07/11/2014 PERRY'S PARCEL & GIFT 22.03Accounts Payable Check
142004 07/11/2014 PETERSON U-CART 1,289.99Accounts Payable Check
142005 07/11/2014 TOM PETERSON 560.00Accounts Payable Check
142006 07/11/2014 PETTY CASH-FINANCE DEPARTMENT 283.85Accounts Payable Check
142007 07/11/2014 PETTY CASH-FIRE DEPARTMENT 83.42Accounts Payable Check
142008 07/11/2014 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY,INC.722.70Accounts Payable Check
142009 07/11/2014 RANGE MASTER 18.00Accounts Payable Check
142010 07/11/2014 VOID 0.00Accounts Payable Check
142011 07/11/2014 RECOGNITION WORKS 48.38Accounts Payable Check
142012 07/11/2014 RENAUD ENTERPRISES, INC.272.40Accounts Payable Check
142013 07/11/2014 REVENUE & COST SPECIALISTS LLC 6,625.00Accounts Payable Check
142014 07/11/2014 ROSSI TRANSPORT SERVICE 2,064.00Accounts Payable Check
142015 07/11/2014 ERIN RUSSELL 388.12Accounts Payable Check
142016 07/11/2014 SAFETY DRIVERS ED., LLC.33.25Accounts Payable Check
142017 07/11/2014 SAN LUIS POWERHOUSE, INC.996.62Accounts Payable Check
142018 07/11/2014 SANTA MARIA MOTORCYCLES, LLC 532.43Accounts Payable Check
142019 07/11/2014 SANTA MONICA SEAFOOD 508.80Accounts Payable Check
142020 07/11/2014 SCOTT O'BRIEN FIRE & SAFETY CO 30.00Accounts Payable Check
142021 07/11/2014 SHELL 1,107.34Accounts Payable Check
142022 07/11/2014 SHORIN-RYU KARATE 406.35Accounts Payable Check
142023 07/11/2014 SLO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 53.00Accounts Payable Check
142024 07/11/2014 RYAN SLOAN 51.00Accounts Payable Check
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
Check
Number
Check
Date Vendor Description Amount
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of July 2014
142025 07/11/2014 SMART AND FINAL 55.16Accounts Payable Check
142026 07/11/2014 DELORES P. SOTO 54.00Accounts Payable Check
142027 07/11/2014 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY 523.58Accounts Payable Check
142028 07/11/2014 MICHAEL STORNETTA 1,379.62Accounts Payable Check
142029 07/11/2014 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL 1,907.00Accounts Payable Check
142030 07/11/2014 TANKS A LOT HYDRO 22.17Accounts Payable Check
142031 07/11/2014 CALLIE TAYLOR 16.24Accounts Payable Check
142032 07/11/2014 LESLIE R. THOMPSON 48.48Accounts Payable Check
142033 07/11/2014 THE TOP SHOP UPHOLSTERY 90.00Accounts Payable Check
142034 07/11/2014 ULTREX BUSINESS PRODUCTS 355.51Accounts Payable Check
142035 07/11/2014 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS 628.74Accounts Payable Check
142036 07/11/2014 IWINA M. VAN BEEK 504.00Accounts Payable Check
142037 07/11/2014 VERIZON WIRELESS 369.56Accounts Payable Check
142038 07/11/2014 VIBORG SAND & GRAVEL, INC.5,653.45Accounts Payable Check
142039 07/11/2014 GARRETT M. VILLA 22.00Accounts Payable Check
142040 07/11/2014 SANDRA M. WALLSCH-DRURY 232.80Accounts Payable Check
142041 07/11/2014 WILLIAM P. WHITE 378.00Accounts Payable Check
142042 07/11/2014 KAREN B. WYKE 340.20Accounts Payable Check
142043 07/11/2014 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC.544.47Accounts Payable Check
142044 07/12/2014 AMERICAN WEST TIRE & AUTO INC 147.30Accounts Payable Check
142045 07/12/2014 ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION 15.00Accounts Payable Check
142046 07/12/2014 ATASCADERO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 34,290.00Accounts Payable Check
142047 07/12/2014 CA ASC FOR LOCAL ECONOMIC DEV 465.00Accounts Payable Check
142048 07/12/2014 CA FIRE CHIEFS ASSC.300.00Accounts Payable Check
142049 07/12/2014 CA FIRE CHIEFS ASSC.250.00Accounts Payable Check
142050 07/12/2014 CA HIGHWAY PATROL 672.40Accounts Payable Check
142051 07/12/2014 CA POLICE CHIEF'S ASSC 524.00Accounts Payable Check
142052 07/12/2014 CALIFORNIA CITY MGMNT FOUNDATN 400.00Accounts Payable Check
142054 07/12/2014 CALIFORNIA JPIA 535,893.00Accounts Payable Check
142055 07/12/2014 CHEVRON & TEXACO BUS. CARD 261.16Accounts Payable Check
142056 07/12/2014 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER 88.18Accounts Payable Check
142057 07/12/2014 DAN BIDDLE PEST CONTROL SERVIC 135.00Accounts Payable Check
142058 07/12/2014 BRIAN S. DAVIN, JR.54.00Accounts Payable Check
142059 07/12/2014 ECONOMIC VITALITY CORPORATION 5,000.00Accounts Payable Check
142060 07/12/2014 ELECTRONIC GATE SYSTEMS, INC.885.00Accounts Payable Check
142061 07/12/2014 DORIAN M. HACHIGIAN 250.00Accounts Payable Check
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
Check
Number
Check
Date Vendor Description Amount
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of July 2014
142062 07/12/2014 CHESTER L. HOGOBOOM 250.00Accounts Payable Check
142063 07/12/2014 ICMA 200.00Accounts Payable Check
142064 07/12/2014 THE INK CO.204.58Accounts Payable Check
142065 07/12/2014 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 3,523.00Accounts Payable Check
142066 07/12/2014 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 118.02Accounts Payable Check
142067 07/12/2014 NBS 6,044.13Accounts Payable Check
142068 07/12/2014 MARTIN E. PARIS 250.00Accounts Payable Check
142069 07/12/2014 ROLSON MUSIC & SOUND 1,050.00Accounts Payable Check
142070 07/12/2014 SHELL 293.96Accounts Payable Check
142071 07/12/2014 SLO AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIST 3,968.00Accounts Payable Check
142072 07/12/2014 DAVID L. SMAW 60.00Accounts Payable Check
142073 07/12/2014 DELORES P. SOTO 54.00Accounts Payable Check
142074 07/12/2014 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY 529.14Accounts Payable Check
142075 07/12/2014 TRAINING INNOVATIONS, INC.600.00Accounts Payable Check
142076 07/12/2014 IWINA M. VAN BEEK 12.00Accounts Payable Check
142077 07/12/2014 SANDRA M. WALLSCH-DRURY 77.55Accounts Payable Check
142078 07/12/2014 WHYTAL PACIFIC 301.00Accounts Payable Check
142079 07/12/2014 JEFF WILSHUSEN 179.00Accounts Payable Check
142080 07/15/2014 DIVISION OF STATE ARCHITECT 48.60Accounts Payable Check
142081 07/15/2014 WEX BANK - 76 UNIVERSL 13,816.94Accounts Payable Check
142082 07/15/2014 DAVID ANASTASIA 564.88Accounts Payable Check
142083 07/17/2014 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION 40.00Payroll Vendor Payment
142084 07/17/2014 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS 1,314.00Payroll Vendor Payment
142085 07/17/2014 ATASCADERO PROF. FIREFIGHTERS 695.53Payroll Vendor Payment
142086 07/17/2014 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC.2,038.78Payroll Vendor Payment
142087 07/17/2014 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC.125.00Payroll Vendor Payment
142088 07/17/2014 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 10,122.69Payroll Vendor Payment
142089 07/17/2014 ICMA-RC 125.00Payroll Vendor Payment
142090 07/17/2014 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 1,416.82Payroll Vendor Payment
142091 07/17/2014 SEIU LOCAL 620 841.78Payroll Vendor Payment
142092 07/17/2014 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 288.29Payroll Vendor Payment
142093 07/17/2014 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 4,068.41Payroll Vendor Payment
142094 07/17/2014 ICMA-RC 125.00Payroll Vendor Payment
1664 07/18/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 37,393.64Payroll Vendor Payment
1665 07/18/2014 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 874.61Payroll Vendor Payment
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
Check
Number
Check
Date Vendor Description Amount
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of July 2014
1666 07/18/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 75,521.69Payroll Vendor Payment
1667 07/18/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 461.53Payroll Vendor Payment
1668 07/18/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 2,808.55Payroll Vendor Payment
1669 07/18/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 993.28Payroll Vendor Payment
1670 07/18/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 1,624.95Payroll Vendor Payment
1671 07/18/2014 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 2,409.06Payroll Vendor Payment
1672 07/22/2014 RABOBANK, N.A.51,984.07Payroll Vendor Payment
1673 07/22/2014 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT 13,502.63Payroll Vendor Payment
1674 07/22/2014 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT 1,044.48Payroll Vendor Payment
142095 07/22/2014 ALLSTATE WORKPLACE DIVISION 2,641.81Payroll Vendor Payment
142096 07/22/2014 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 131,036.19Payroll Vendor Payment
142097 07/22/2014 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS CO 892.42Payroll Vendor Payment
142098 07/22/2014 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES 1,662.46Payroll Vendor Payment
142099 07/22/2014 PREFERRED BENEFITS INSURANCE 9,802.51Payroll Vendor Payment
142100 07/26/2014 A & T ARBORISTS & VEGETATION 600.00Accounts Payable Check
142101 07/26/2014 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.234.90Accounts Payable Check
142102 07/26/2014 AIRFLOW FILTER SERVICE, INC.1,104.50Accounts Payable Check
142103 07/26/2014 AIRGAS USA, LLC 104.80Accounts Payable Check
142104 07/26/2014 A-JAY EXCAVATING, INC.2,572.50Accounts Payable Check
142105 07/26/2014 ALL SIGNS AND GRAPHICS, LLC 344.00Accounts Payable Check
142106 07/26/2014 ALTHOUSE & MEADE, INC.1,783.83Accounts Payable Check
142107 07/26/2014 AMERICAN DIGITAL CORPORATION 28,489.38Accounts Payable Check
142108 07/26/2014 AMERICAN MARBORG 107.25Accounts Payable Check
142109 07/26/2014 AMERICAN WEST TIRE & AUTO INC 472.53Accounts Payable Check
142110 07/26/2014 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS 144.20Accounts Payable Check
142111 07/26/2014 AT&T 818.45Accounts Payable Check
142112 07/26/2014 AT&T 167.85Accounts Payable Check
142113 07/26/2014 ATASCADERO NEWS 5,183.30Accounts Payable Check
142114 07/26/2014 BASSETT'S CRICKET RANCH,INC.47.93Accounts Payable Check
142115 07/26/2014 BATTERY SYSTEMS 92.75Accounts Payable Check
142116 07/26/2014 BERRY MAN, INC.225.80Accounts Payable Check
142117 07/26/2014 BLUE TARP FINANCIAL, INC.9,249.91Accounts Payable Check
142118 07/26/2014 LORI BRICKEY 136.47Accounts Payable Check
142119 07/26/2014 BURKE,WILLIAMS, & SORENSON LLP 23,638.55Accounts Payable Check
142120 07/26/2014 BURT INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 150.01Accounts Payable Check
142121 07/26/2014 LIBBY CABRAL 70.04Accounts Payable Check
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
Check
Number
Check
Date Vendor Description Amount
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of July 2014
142122 07/26/2014 CALPORTLAND COMPANY 10,945.05Accounts Payable Check
142123 07/26/2014 KATE CAPELA 12.99Accounts Payable Check
142124 07/26/2014 CENTRAL COAST R & R LOCK 34.56Accounts Payable Check
142125 07/26/2014 CENTRAL VALLEY TOXICOLOGY,INC.230.00Accounts Payable Check
142126 07/26/2014 COAST LINE DISTRIBUTING 301.50Accounts Payable Check
142127 07/26/2014 COASTAL COPY, LP 370.10Accounts Payable Check
142128 07/26/2014 COLE-PARMER 270.95Accounts Payable Check
142129 07/26/2014 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.603.17Accounts Payable Check
142130 07/26/2014 DAVE BANG ASSC., INC.174.64Accounts Payable Check
142131 07/26/2014 DEPT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CTRL 200.00Accounts Payable Check
142132 07/26/2014 EL CAMINO VETERINARY HOSP 1,822.36Accounts Payable Check
142133 07/26/2014 ESCUELA DEL RIO 90.00Accounts Payable Check
142134 07/26/2014 FASTENAL COMPANY 483.64Accounts Payable Check
142135 07/26/2014 FEDERAL EXPRESS 5.84Accounts Payable Check
142136 07/26/2014 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC.316.81Accounts Payable Check
142137 07/26/2014 FERRAVANTI GRADING & PAVING 9,200.00Accounts Payable Check
142138 07/26/2014 FIRST TRANSIT, INC.9,866.76Accounts Payable Check
142139 07/26/2014 FLUID RESOURCE MANAGEMENT,INC.1,750.00Accounts Payable Check
142140 07/26/2014 JENNIFER J. FOX 54.00Accounts Payable Check
142141 07/26/2014 FRAZEE PAINT 46.74Accounts Payable Check
142142 07/26/2014 FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY 144.00Accounts Payable Check
142143 07/26/2014 GAS COMPANY 366.93Accounts Payable Check
142144 07/26/2014 GEM AUTO PARTS 738.85Accounts Payable Check
142145 07/26/2014 GILBERT'S LANDSCAPES 407.91Accounts Payable Check
142146 07/26/2014 BARRY HARDY 42.99Accounts Payable Check
142147 07/26/2014 DEBORAH HOLLOWELL 6.47Accounts Payable Check
142149 07/26/2014 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 4,317.30Accounts Payable Check
142150 07/26/2014 J. CARROLL CORPORATION 786.43Accounts Payable Check
142151 07/26/2014 K & M INTERNATIONAL 1,966.05Accounts Payable Check
142152 07/26/2014 KPRL 1230 AM 320.00Accounts Payable Check
142153 07/26/2014 KRITZ EXCAVATING & TRUCKNG INC 454.73Accounts Payable Check
142154 07/26/2014 LAYNE LABORATORIES, INC.34.94Accounts Payable Check
142155 07/26/2014 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO. INC 1,428.00Accounts Payable Check
142156 07/26/2014 LEHIGH HANSON 2,389.72Accounts Payable Check
142157 07/26/2014 MADRONE LANDSCAPES, INC.1,620.00Accounts Payable Check
142158 07/26/2014 MEDWORKS MEDICAL CENTER 785.00Accounts Payable Check
142159 07/26/2014 MENTAL MARKETING, INC.8,376.92Accounts Payable Check
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
Check
Number
Check
Date Vendor Description Amount
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of July 2014
142160 07/26/2014 MEYER TREE CONSULTING 105.00Accounts Payable Check
142161 07/26/2014 MID-COAST MOWER & SAW, INC.84.95Accounts Payable Check
142162 07/26/2014 MIKE DEAN'S MOBILE AUTO REPAIR 67.14Accounts Payable Check
142163 07/26/2014 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE 1,092.73Accounts Payable Check
142164 07/26/2014 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 54.60Accounts Payable Check
142165 07/26/2014 MOUNTAIN SHADES, INC.233.77Accounts Payable Check
142166 07/26/2014 NORTH COAST ENGINEERING INC.13,218.52Accounts Payable Check
142167 07/26/2014 OFFICE DEPOT INC.377.22Accounts Payable Check
142168 07/26/2014 ONTRAC 31.05Accounts Payable Check
142169 07/26/2014 PASO ROBLES FORD LINCOLN MERC 154.77Accounts Payable Check
142170 07/26/2014 PENFIELD & SMITH ENGINEERS INC 1,777.02Accounts Payable Check
142171 07/26/2014 DAVID C. PETERSON, ESQ.910.00Accounts Payable Check
142172 07/26/2014 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPARTMENT 199.77Accounts Payable Check
142173 07/26/2014 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION, INC.128.29Accounts Payable Check
142174 07/26/2014 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY,INC.1,434.40Accounts Payable Check
142175 07/26/2014 RADIATOR SUPPLY HOUSE, INC.2,220.00Accounts Payable Check
142176 07/26/2014 RECOGNITION WORKS 6.45Accounts Payable Check
142177 07/26/2014 RENAUD ENTERPRISES, INC.193.93Accounts Payable Check
142178 07/26/2014 ROB DAVIS BACKHOE 7,150.00Accounts Payable Check
142179 07/26/2014 SAN LUIS POWERHOUSE, INC.1,382.18Accounts Payable Check
142180 07/26/2014 SERVICE SYSTEMS ASSC, INC.2,284.01Accounts Payable Check
142181 07/26/2014 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 3,389.00Accounts Payable Check
142182 07/26/2014 STONEAGE ARTS, INC.385.23Accounts Payable Check
142183 07/26/2014 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL 1,780.00Accounts Payable Check
142184 07/26/2014 DEBRA E. TIDD 275.00Accounts Payable Check
142185 07/26/2014 MARCIA TORGERSON 28.56Accounts Payable Check
142186 07/26/2014 TOSTE GRADING & PAVING, INC.9,927.75Accounts Payable Check
142187 07/26/2014 TRACE ANALYTICS, LLC 310.00Accounts Payable Check
142191 07/26/2014 U.S. BANK 29,341.54Accounts Payable Check
142192 07/26/2014 ULTREX BUSINESS PRODUCTS 150.27Accounts Payable Check
142193 07/26/2014 UNITED STAFFING ASSC., INC.4,930.20Accounts Payable Check
142194 07/26/2014 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS 5,836.65Accounts Payable Check
142195 07/26/2014 VERIZON WIRELESS 1,453.69Accounts Payable Check
142196 07/26/2014 VIBORG SAND & GRAVEL, INC.3,443.08Accounts Payable Check
142197 07/26/2014 WALLACE GROUP 28,131.95Accounts Payable Check
142198 07/26/2014 WILKINS ACTION GRAPHICS 102.73Accounts Payable Check
142199 07/26/2014 WISHPETS CO.78.12Accounts Payable Check
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
Check
Number
Check
Date Vendor Description Amount
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of July 2014
142200 07/26/2014 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICES CO.123.46Accounts Payable Check
142201 07/26/2014 AIRFLOW FILTER SERVICE, INC.42.58Accounts Payable Check
142202 07/26/2014 A-JAY EXCAVATING, INC.4,278.00Accounts Payable Check
142203 07/26/2014 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC 141.00Accounts Payable Check
142204 07/26/2014 AMERICAN WEST TIRE & AUTO INC 18.00Accounts Payable Check
142205 07/26/2014 ATASCADERO HAY & FEED 1,035.00Accounts Payable Check
142206 07/26/2014 BASSETT'S CRICKET RANCH,INC.240.55Accounts Payable Check
142207 07/26/2014 BERRY MAN, INC.928.25Accounts Payable Check
142208 07/26/2014 JUSTIN BLACK 627.24Accounts Payable Check
142209 07/26/2014 BMI 330.00Accounts Payable Check
142210 07/26/2014 BRADS OVERHEAD DOORS, INC.140.00Accounts Payable Check
142211 07/26/2014 GREGORY A. BRAZZI 75.00Accounts Payable Check
142212 07/26/2014 BREZDEN PEST CONTROL, INC.80.00Accounts Payable Check
142213 07/26/2014 C & H CYCLES 343.14Accounts Payable Check
142214 07/26/2014 CA DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE 2,763.25Accounts Payable Check
142215 07/26/2014 KATE CAPELA 159.03Accounts Payable Check
142216 07/26/2014 CENTRAL NEBRASKA PACKING, INC.6,330.17Accounts Payable Check
142217 07/26/2014 CO OF SAN LUIS OBISPO SART PRG 1,500.00Accounts Payable Check
142218 07/26/2014 COLONY AUTO SERVICE, INC.260.04Accounts Payable Check
142219 07/26/2014 COMMUNITY CHURCH OF ATASCADERO 84.00Accounts Payable Check
142220 07/26/2014 LINDA CONWAY 4.04Accounts Payable Check
142221 07/26/2014 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER 38.86Accounts Payable Check
142222 07/26/2014 CULLIGAN/CENTRAL COAST WTR TRT 70.00Accounts Payable Check
142223 07/26/2014 MATTHEW J. CURRY 100.00Accounts Payable Check
142224 07/26/2014 BRIAN S. DAVIN, JR.90.00Accounts Payable Check
142225 07/26/2014 DEEP BLUE INTEGRATION, INC.135.00Accounts Payable Check
142226 07/26/2014 BILL DENZEL 624.00Accounts Payable Check
142227 07/26/2014 MARCUS DUNNING 606.00Accounts Payable Check
142228 07/26/2014 EL CAMINO VETERINARY HOSP 90.05Accounts Payable Check
142229 07/26/2014 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR 409.70Accounts Payable Check
142230 07/26/2014 FIRE CHIEFS ASSC OF SLO CO 50.00Accounts Payable Check
142231 07/26/2014 JENNIFER J. FOX 54.00Accounts Payable Check
142232 07/26/2014 MICHAEL L. GIL 60.00Accounts Payable Check
142233 07/26/2014 KATHLEEN A. HARBOTTLE 476.00Accounts Payable Check
142234 07/26/2014 ETHAN L. HICKS 117.00Accounts Payable Check
142235 07/26/2014 JEFF HUMPHREY 200.00Accounts Payable Check
142236 07/26/2014 K-MAN CYCLERY 61.50Accounts Payable Check
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
Check
Number
Check
Date Vendor Description Amount
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of July 2014
142237 07/26/2014 M.J. BERTACCINI & ASSOCIATES 3,395.00Accounts Payable Check
142238 07/26/2014 SAMUEL H. MCMILLAN 510.00Accounts Payable Check
142239 07/26/2014 RILEY A. METE 156.00Accounts Payable Check
142240 07/26/2014 MID-COAST MOWER & SAW, INC.127.51Accounts Payable Check
142242 07/26/2014 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE 722.52Accounts Payable Check
142243 07/26/2014 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 345.68Accounts Payable Check
142244 07/26/2014 MPI 84.13Accounts Payable Check
142245 07/26/2014 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY CO.64.36Accounts Payable Check
142246 07/26/2014 NORTH COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY 4,750.00Accounts Payable Check
142247 07/26/2014 OFFICE DEPOT INC.1,207.65Accounts Payable Check
142248 07/26/2014 PASO ROBLES FORD LINCOLN MERC 6,345.28Accounts Payable Check
142249 07/26/2014 PEO CHAPTER VF 84.00Accounts Payable Check
142250 07/26/2014 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY,INC.347.90Accounts Payable Check
142251 07/26/2014 MICHAEL D. SAMANIEGO 210.00Accounts Payable Check
142252 07/26/2014 SANTA LUCIA SPORTSMEN ASSC INC 280.00Accounts Payable Check
142253 07/26/2014 SBRPSTC 175.00Accounts Payable Check
142254 07/26/2014 JOHN C. SIEMENS 644.00Accounts Payable Check
142255 07/26/2014 SHARON SINE 56.50Accounts Payable Check
142256 07/26/2014 SLO CO FIRE TRAINING OFFICERS 75.00Accounts Payable Check
142257 07/26/2014 SMART AND FINAL 51.54Accounts Payable Check
142258 07/26/2014 DAVID L. SMAW 210.00Accounts Payable Check
142259 07/26/2014 DELORES P. SOTO 36.00Accounts Payable Check
142260 07/26/2014 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY 523.58Accounts Payable Check
142261 07/26/2014 STATE WATER RES CONTROL BOARD 440.00Accounts Payable Check
142262 07/26/2014 STATE WATER RES CONTROL BOARD 440.00Accounts Payable Check
142263 07/26/2014 MIKA TEMPLE 100.00Accounts Payable Check
142264 07/26/2014 STEVE TIROTTA 135.00Accounts Payable Check
142265 07/26/2014 ANTHONY J. TRAVERSO 54.00Accounts Payable Check
142266 07/26/2014 UNITED STAFFING ASSC., INC.633.60Accounts Payable Check
142267 07/26/2014 BRIDGET M. VAN BEEK 90.00Accounts Payable Check
142268 07/26/2014 IWINA M. VAN BEEK 38.00Accounts Payable Check
142269 07/26/2014 GARRETT M. VILLA 110.00Accounts Payable Check
142270 07/26/2014 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY 317.83Accounts Payable Check
142271 07/26/2014 Z.A.P. MANUFACTURING, INC.2,217.45Accounts Payable Check
142272 07/31/2014 ATASCADERO PROF. FIREFIGHTERS 695.53Payroll Vendor Payment
142273 07/31/2014 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE 9,582.69Payroll Vendor Payment
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
Check
Number
Check
Date Vendor Description Amount
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of July 2014
142274 07/31/2014 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 1,629.78Payroll Vendor Payment
142275 07/31/2014 SEIU LOCAL 620 843.52Payroll Vendor Payment
142276 07/31/2014 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 288.29Payroll Vendor Payment
142277 07/31/2014 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 2,320.00Payroll Vendor Payment
$ 1,724,336.58
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
June 2014
June 2014 Investment Report
RECOMMENDATION:
REPORT IN BRIEF:
Cash and Investments
Checking 541,529$
Zoo Credit Card Deposit Account 14,083
Money Market Accounts -
Certificates of Deposit 7,048,285
Government Securities 10,864,212
LAIF 12,842,928
Cash with Fiscal Agents 1,417,865
Cash in Banks at June 30, 2014 32,728,902$
Deposits in Transit 25,683
Outstanding Checks (299,499)
Cash and Investments at June 30, 2014 32,455,086$
Investment Activity
Securities Purchased:
Purchase Date Description Type Cost Maturity Date
05/14/14 Cit Bank CD 245,000$ 05/14/19
05/21/14 Minnwest Bank CD 245,000 05/21/19
06/24/14 Communityone Bank CD 245,000 06/18/19
06/27/14 Synchrony Bank CD 245,000 06/27/19
Securities Matured:
None
Atascadero City Council
Council receive and file the City Treasurer's report for quarter ending June 2014.
Staff Report - City Treasurer
Page 1 of 11
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 09/09/14
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 09/09/14
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 09/09/14
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 09/09/14
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 09/09/14
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 09/09/14
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 09/09/14
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 09/09/14
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 09/09/14
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 09/09/14
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 09/09/14
ITEM NUMBER: A-5
DATE: 09/09/14
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report – Public Works Department
Amendment Number 1 to the Cooperation Agreement for the
Community Development Block Grant Program
Fiscal Years 2015/16 through 2017/2018
RECOMMENDATION:
Council authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment Number 1 to the
Cooperation Agreement between the County of San Luis Obispo and the City of
Atascadero for joint participation in the Community Development Block Grant Program
for Fiscal Years 2015/2016 through 2017/2018.
DISCUSSION:
Background: On May 27, 2014, Council authorized the continued participation in the
urban county Community Development Block Grant Program for Fiscal Years
2015/2016 through 2017/2018. The County of San Luis Obispo has requested an
amendment to the Original Agreement to provide for two HUD required changes. The
first revision will adjust the fiscal year term to provide a three year period and the
second revision will add a paragraph as required by HUD which clarifies the permitted
use of CDBG funding.
The May 27, 2014 staff report for continued participation in the urban county
Community Development Block Grant Program contained the correct fiscal year term of
2015/2016 to 2017/2018 , however the agreement provided by the County incorrectly
stated Fiscal Years 2015 through 2017. Section 1 of Amendment No. 1 amends the
Original Agreement to read as follows:
The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of three (3) years commencing July 1,
2015 through June 30, 2018.
Amendment No. 1 will also add a paragraph in Section 2 amending Section IV, Use of
Program Funds, of the Original Agreement to include the following:
ITEM NUMBER: A-5
DATE: 09/09/14
The City may not sell, trade, or otherwise transfer all of any portion of CDBG funds to
another metropolitan city, urban county, unit of general local government, or Indian
tribe, or insular area that directly or indirectly receives CDBG funds in exchange for any
other funds, credits or non-Federal considerations, but must use such funds for
activities eligible under Title I of the Act.
Analysis: Staff has reviewed Amendment No. 1 and recommends approval.
Continued participation in the CDBG program with the County provides continued
allocation of CDBG funding to Atascadero.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The approval of Amendment No. 1 will provide an extension of the CDBG funding to
include the 2017/2018 fiscal year term.
ALTERNATIVES:
The Council may direct Staff as they deem appropriate.
ATTACHMENT:
Amendment Number 1 to the CDBG Cooperation Agreement
ITEM NUMBER: A-5
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO
A COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AND THE CITY OF ATASCADERO FOR JOINT PARTICIPATION IN THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM, THE HOME
INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM, THE EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS
GRANT PROGRAM, AND THE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR PERSONS WITH
AIDS PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2015 THROUGH 2017
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of __ , 2014,
by and between the County of San Luis Obispo, a political subdivision of the S tate of
California, hereinafter called “County”; and the City of Atascadero, a municipal
corporation of the State of California, located in the County of San Luis Obispo,
hereinafter called “City”; jointly referred to as “Parties.”
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, in 1974, the U.S. Congress enacted and the President signed a law
entitled, The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, herein called the “Act”.
Said Act is omnibus legislation relating to federal involvement in a wide range of
housing and community development activities and contains eight separate titles; and
WHEREAS, Title I of the Act is entitled “Community Development” and governs
programs for housing and community development within metropolitan cities and urban
counties or communities by providing financial assistance annually for area-wide plans
and for housing, public services and public works programs; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program, the
HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Program, the Emergency Solutions Grant
(ESG) Program, and the Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA)
Program are consolidated under Title I of the Act; and
WHEREAS, the County of San Luis Obispo has requested of the federal
Department of Housing and Urban Development, hereinafter referred to as “HUD”, that
the County be designated as an “urban county”; and
WHEREAS, the County needs to requalify as an urban county and will be eligible
to receive CDBG funds provided that the County’s entitled cities defer their entitleme nt
to the County to enable both the County and the entitlement cities to jointly participate
in the program; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to participate jointly with the County in said
program; and
ITEM NUMBER: A-5
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
WHEREAS, on July 15, 2014, the County and City en tered into a Cooperation
Agreement (the Original Cooperation Agreement) in order for the County to requalify as
an urban county and submitted said cooperation agreement to the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD); and
WHEREAS, HUD reviewed said Original Cooperation Agreement and
determined that it must be amended to provide for a three year term and to include
additional language required by the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development,
and Related agencies Appropriations Act, 2014, Public Law 113-76.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, recitals and other
provisions hereof, the Parties agree as follows:
1. The first sentence of Paragraph C, entitled “C. Term of Agreement – Automatic
Renewal Provision,” of Section I, entitled “SECTION I. General.,” of the Original
Cooperation Agreement is hereby amended and replaced to read as follows:
The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of three (3) years commencing
July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2018.
2. The section entitled “SECTION IV. Use of Program Funds” of the Original
Cooperation Agreement is hereby amended to add a new section “I” that reads as
follows:
I. The City may not sell, trade, or otherwise transfer all of any portion of
CDBG funds to another metropolitan city, urban county, unit of general
local government, or Indian tribe, or insular area that directly or indirectly
receives CDBG funds in exchange for any other funds, credits or non -
Federal considerations, but must use such funds for activities eligible
under Title I of the Act.
3. All other provisions of the Original Cooperation Agreement not specifically
amended herein remain in full force and effect.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment Number 1 to the
Cooperation Agreement to be executed and attested by their proper officer thereunder
duly authorized, and their official seals to be hereunto affixed, all as of the day first
above written.
ITEM NUMBER: A-5
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
____________________, Deputy County Counsel
Date:
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
By:
Chairperson of the Board of Supervisors
Date:
ATTEST:
Julie Rodewald, County Clerk
Date:
CITY OF ATASCADERO
Tom O’Malley, Mayor
Date:
ATTEST:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
Date:
ITEM NUMBER: A-5
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Rachelle Rickard, City Manager
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney
Date:
ITEM NUMBER: A-6
DATE: 09/09/14
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report – Police Department
Municipal Ordinance Banning the Possession of Synthetic Spices
and/or Synthetic Bath Salts
RECOMMENDATION:
Council adopt on second reading, by title only, the proposed ordinance to ban the
possession and sale of synthetic spice and/or synthetic bath salts.
DISCUSSION:
On August 12, 2014 the City Council held a hearing on the proposed changes to Title 5
of the Atascadero Municipal Code and introduced for first reading, by title only, the draft
ordinance in a 5-0 vote. The proposed ordinance regulates the possession and sale of
certain intoxicating chemical substances known as synthetic drugs.
Creating an ordinance to ban possession of spice and bath salts will allow law
enforcement the ability to take enforcement action against persons in possession of
these items and confiscate them. The ordinance will also allow police personnel to
confiscate these products if retailers choose to offer them for sale to community
members, whether or not any sale takes place. This ordinance will give the police
department the ability to effectively address this serious problem in our community.
If the Council adopts this Ordinance on second reading on September 9, 2014, the
Ordinance will go into effect on October 9th.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None. The adoption of this Draft Ordinance would be limited to the time and resources
dedicated to investigations of cases addressing possession of these illegal drugs.
Existing resources of the Police Department would be utilized to address the
investigation of cases related to this proposed ordinance, if any.
ITEM NUMBER: A-6
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Ordinance A
ITEM NUMBER: A-6
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
DRAFT ORDINANCE A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, ADDING TITLE 5, CHAPTER 16 TO THE
ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE, PROHIBITING THE POSSESSION
AND SALES OF CERTAIN INTOXICATING CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS
KNOWN AS SYNTHETIC DRUGS
WHEREAS, the City Council is committed to protecting the public health, safety and
welfare of the community, and to meet these goals it is necessary for the City Council to adopt
measures, from time-to-time, to meet threats to the public health, safety, and welfare; and
WHEREAS, recreational use of Psychoactive Bath Salts, Psychoactive Herbal Incense, and
similar products commonly known as “Synthetic Drugs” has been documented to cause
hallucinations, agitation, psychosis, aggression, suicidal and homicidal ideations, cannibalism, and
death; and
WHEREAS, Synthetic Drugs are extremely dangerous and are gaining popularity at an
alarming rate among high school and college-aged individuals, as well as among parolees and
probationers; and
WHEREAS, those drugs are widely available in stores throughout the City, despite the
State of California’s and the federal government’s attempt to ban such drugs; and
WHEREAS, California State Law, under Health & Safety Code sections 11357.5 (banning
synthetic cannabinoid compounds and derivatives) and 11375.5 (banning synthetic stimulant
compounds and derivatives) and 11401 (banning “analogs” of controlled substances) (collectively
“State Synthetic Drug Laws”), and Federal law, under the Controlled Substances Act (the “CSA”)
(21 U.S.C. § 801, et seq.), prohibit Synthetic Drugs; and
WHEREAS, although the State Synthetic Drug Laws and the CSA prohibit certain
compounds that are used to create synthetic drugs, they are not comprehensive enough to eliminate
the possession of all Synthetic Drugs in the City; and
WHEREAS, the makers of Synthetic Drugs continually alter the composition of the
compounds in their products so as to not come under the prohibition of the State Synthetic Drugs
Laws, the CSA, and other laws and regulations that attempt to prohibit the sale of Synthetic Drugs;
and
WHEREAS, to avoid the continuing threat to public health, safety and welfare that would
occur if Synthetic Drugs were permitted in the City, the City finds it necessary to declare that an
individual or business which possesses Synthetic Drugs as defined herein is a threat to public health,
safety and welfare and is therefore subject to the City’s administrative, criminal and civil
enforcement procedures (set forth in Title 12 of the Atascadero Municipal Code) and in the case of a
ITEM NUMBER: A-6
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
business, revocation of a business license pursuant to Chapter of the Atascadero Municipal Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Title 5, Chapter 16 is added to the Atascadero Municipal Code to read as follows:
Chapter 16 Psychoactive Bath Salts, Psychoactive Herbal Incense, and other Synthetic Drugs
Sections:
16.01 Purpose and Intent
16.02 Definitions
16.03 Possession of Synthetic Drugs Prohibited
16.04 Public Nuisance
16.05 Confiscation of Synthetic Drugs
16.06 Suspension or Revocation of Business License
16.07 Penalties
16.08 Seizure of Evidence
16.09 Exclusions
16.01 Purpose and Intent
A. The purpose and intent of this Chapter is to provide the City with measures to address the
dangers to the community posed by Synthetic Drugs that are not regulated by State or Federal law.
B. The City Council finds the dangers of Synthetic Drugs, which have been documented to
cause hallucinations, agitations, psychosis, aggression, suicidal and homicidal ideations,
cannibalism, and death, require regulation.
C. This Chapter shall not apply to any activity already regulated by State or Federal drug laws,
or any other applicable State or Federal law or regulation.
16.02 Definitions
The definitions and provisions contained in this section shall govern the construction of words and
phrases used in this chapter. The definition of each word or phrase shall constitute, to the extent
applicable, the definition of each word or phrase which is derived from it, or from which it is a
derivative, as the case may be.
A. “Business” shall have the same meaning as the term is defined in Title 3, Chapter 5 of this
Code.
B. “Distribute,” “distributing,” and “distribution” shall mean to furnish, give away, exchange,
transfer, deliver or supply, whether for monetary gain or not.
ITEM NUMBER: A-6
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
C. “Person” shall include any natural person, business, firm, company, corporation, public
corporation, club, trust, partnership, association and/or similar organization.
D. “Possess,” “possessing,” and “possession,” shall mean to have for consumption, distribution,
or sale in one’s actual or constructive custody or control, or under one’s authority or power, whether
such custody, control, authority and/or power be exercised solely or jointly with others.
E. “Provide,” “providing,” and “provision” shall mean offering to distribute or sell a product or
substance to any person.
F. “Psychoactive Bath Salts,” shall mean any crystalline or powder product that contains a
synthetic chemical compound that, when consumed, elicits psychoactive or psychotropic stimulant
effects. The term “Psychoactive Bath Salts” includes without limitation:
1. Products that elicit psychoactive or psychotropic stimulant effects and contain any of the
following substances:
(a) Salvia Divinorum or Salvinorum A; all parts of the plant presently classified botanically as
Salvia Divinorum, whether growing or not, the seeds thereof, any extract from any part of such
plant, and every compound, manufacture, salts derivative, mixture or preparation of such plant, its
seeds or extracts;
(b) Cathinone (2-amino-1-phenyl-1-propane), 4-methylmethcathinone (2 methylamino-1-(4-
methylpheny)propan-1 one), 4 methoxymethcathi- none (1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2(methylamine)
propan-1-one), MDPV (methylenedioxypyrovalerone), methylene (3,4-methylenedioxy-
Nmethylcathinone), methcathinone (2-(methylamino)-1-phenyl-propan-1-one), flephedrone (4
fluoromethcathinone), 3-FMC (3-fluoromethcathinone), ethcathinone (2-ethylamino-1 -phenyl-
propan-1 –one), butylone β-keto Nmethylbenzodioxolylbutamine), a-PPP (a
pyrrolidinopropiophenone),MPPP(4-methyl- pyrrolidinopropiophenone), MDPPP (3’,4’
methylenedioxy-apyrrolidinopropiophenone), ά-PVP (1-phenyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-pentanone),
naphyrone (1-naphthalen-2-yl -2-pyrrolidin-1-ylpentan-1-one), 6-APDB (6(2aminopropyl)2,3
dihydrobenzo-furan), and analogs of MDA (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine);
(c) any derivative of the above listed compounds;
(d) any synthetic substance and its isomers with a chemical structure similar to the above listed
compounds;
(e) any chemical alteration of the above listed compounds; or
(f) any other substantially similar chemical structure or compound; and
2. Products that elicit psychoactive or psychotropic stimulant effects and are marketed under
any of the following trade names: Bliss, Blizzard, Blue Silk, Bonzai Grow, Charge Plus, Charlie,
Cloud Nine, Euphoria, Hurricane, Ivory Snow, Ivory Wave, Lunar Wave, Ocean, Ocean Burst,
ITEM NUMBER: A-6
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
Pixie Dust, Posh, Pure Ivory, Purple Wave, Red Dove, Scarface, Snow Leopard, Stardust, Vanilla
Sky, White Dove, White Night, and White Lightning.
G. “Psychoactive Herbal Incense” shall mean any organic product consisting of plant material
that contains a synthetic stimulant compound that, when consumed, elicits psychoactive or
psychotropic euphoric effects. The term “Psychoactive Herbal Incense” includes without limitation:
1. Products that elicit psychoactive or psychotropic euphoric effects and contain any of the
following substances:
(a) cannabicyclohexanol (2-[(1R,3S)-3-hydroxycyclohexyl]- 5-(2 methylnonan-2-yl)phenol),
JWH-018 (naphthalen-1-yl -(1-pentylindol-3 yl) methanone), JWH-073 (naphthalen-l-yl -(1-
butylindol-3 yl)methanone), JWH- 200 (1-(2-morpholin-4-ylethyl)indol-3-yl) naphthalen-1-
ylmethanone, HU-210 or 1.1-dimethylheptyl-11-hydroxy-delta8-tetrahydrocannabinol) (6aR,10aR)-
9- (Hydroxymethyl)- 6,6 dimethyl-3-(2-mehtyloctan-2-yl)- 6a ,7, 10, 10 atetra-hydrobenzo[c]
chromen-1-ol), CP 47, 497 (2 - [ ( 1R, 3S ) -3- hydroxycyclo hexyl] – 5 -(2-methyloctan-2-
yl)phenol) and the dimethylhexyl, dimethyloctyl and dimethylnonyl homologues of CP-47, 497,
AM-2201 (`1-[(5- fluoropentyl)-1H-indol-3-yl]-(naphthalen-1-yl)methanone), 1-Pentyl-3 (2-
methoxyphenylacetyl)indole (also known as JWH-250), 1-Hexyl-3-(1- naphthoyl)indole (also
known as JWH-019), 1-Pentyl-3-(4-chloro-1- naphthoyl)indole (also known as JWH-398), N-
benzylpiperazine (also known as BZP), 1-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine (also known as
TFMPP);
(b) any derivative of the above listed compounds;
(c) any synthetic substance and its isomers with a chemical structure similar to the above listed
compounds;
(d) any chemical alteration of the above listed compounds; or
(e) any other substantially similar chemical structure or compound; or
(f) any other synthetic cannabinoid; and
2. Products that elicit psychoactive psychotropic euphoric effects and are marketed under any
of the following trade names: Scooby Snax, K2, K3, Spice, Genie, Smoke, Potpouri, Buzz, Spice
99, Voodoo, Pulse, Hush, Mystery, Earthquake, Stinger, Ocean Blue, Serenity, Fake Weed, and
Black Mamba.
H. “Psychoactive or psychotropic stimulant effects” shall mean affecting the central nervous
system or brain function to change perception, mood, consciousness, cognition, and/or behavior in
ways that are similar to the effects of cocaine, methylphenidate or amphetamines.
I. “Psychoactive or psychotropic euphoric effects” shall mean affecting the central nervous
system or brain function to change perception, mood, consciousness, cognition, and/or behavior in
ways that are similar to the effects of cannabis.
ITEM NUMBER: A-6
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
J. “Sell,” “selling,” and “sale” shall mean to furnish, exchange, transfer, deliver, or supply for
monetary gain.
K. “Synthetic Drug” shall include Psychoactive Bath Salts and Psychoactive Herbal Incense, as
those terms are defined hereinabove.
16.03 Possession of Synthetic Drugs Prohibited
A. It is unlawful for any person to possess any Synthetic Drug within the City.
B. The enforcing officer may consider any of the following evidentiary factors to determine if
the product is a Synthetic Drug:
1. The product is not suitable for its marketed use (such as crystalline or powder being
marketed as “glass cleaner”);
2. The product contains a warning label that is not typically present on products that are used
for that product’s marketed use (such as “not for human consumption,” “not for purchase by
minors,” or “does not contain chemicals banned by section 11357.5”);
3. The product resembles an illicit street drug (such as cocaine, methamphetamine or
marijuana); or
4. The product’s name or packaging uses images or slang referencing an illicit drug.
16.04 Public Nuisance
A. The storage, provision, sale, or distribution of any Synthetic Drug from any property,
structure, or building in the City and any possession of any Synthetic Drug in the City is declared to
be a public nuisance.
B. Civil Remedies Available; Remedies Cumulative. In addition to the penalties provided in
Title 12, any violation of any provision of this Chapter shall constitute a public nuisance and may be
abated by the City by civil process by means of a restraining order, a preliminary or permanent
injunction, or in any manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisance. All remedies
herein are cumulative and non-exclusive.
16.05 Confiscation of Synthetic Drugs.
Because the use of Synthetic Drugs has been documented to cause hallucinations, agitation,
psychosis, aggression, suicidal and homicidal ideations, cannibalism, and death, any violation of
this Chapter presents a grave and imminent danger not only to the person consuming the Synthetic
Drug, but also to the public at large. Any Police Officer who issues a criminal citation under this
Chapter shall confiscate any Synthetic Drugs and store them, pending the conclusion of the criminal
case.
ITEM NUMBER: A-6
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
16.06 Suspension or Revocation of Business License.
No person holding a validly issued City business license and owning or operating a business in the
City may use that business to provide, distribute, or sell any Synthetic Drug or any substance
claimed or represented to be a Synthetic Drug. A violation of this Chapter by the holder of a validly
issued City business license shall constitute grounds for suspension or revocation of a business
license in accordance with the procedures set forth in Title 3 of this Code.
16.07 Penalties
A. Failure to comply with any of the requirements of this Chapter is a misdemeanor punishable
by imprisonment in the County jail for a period not exceeding six (6) months, or by fine not
exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both, provided that the City Attorney may specify in
the accusatory pleading that the offense shall be an infraction if he/she determines that such action
would be in the interest of justice.
B. Each person committing, causing, or maintaining a violation of this Chapter or failing to
comply with the requirements set forth herein shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each
and every day during any portion of which any violation of any provision of this Chapter is
committed, continued, maintained, or permitted by such person and shall be punishable accordingly.
16.08 Seizure of Evidence
Any products or substances possessed in violation of any provision of this Chapter shall be seized
and stored in accordance with law.
16.09 Exclusions
A. This Chapter shall not apply to drugs or substances lawfully prescribed or to intoxicating
chemical compounds that have been approved by the Federal Food and Drug Administration or are
specifically permitted by California law.
B. This Chapter shall not apply to drugs or substances that are prohibited by State or Federal
law, including without limitation, the State Synthetic Drug Laws, and the Federal Controlled
Substances Act.
C. This Chapter shall not be deemed to prohibit any act that is permitted, prohibited, or
preempted by any State or Federal law or regulation.
ITEM NUMBER: A-6
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
SECTION 2. A summary of this ordinance shall be published twice: at least five days prior to
its final passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper published and circulated in the City of
Atascadero, and; before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its final passage, in the
Atascadero News, a newspaper published and circulated in the City of Atascadero. A copy of
the full text of this ordinance shall be on file in the City Clerk’s Office on and after the date
following introduction and passage and shall be available to any interested member of the public.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on _____________, and PASSED
and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero, State of California, on
____________, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
CITY OF ATASCADERO
______________________________________
Tom O’Malley, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________________
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________________
Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney
ITEM NUMBER: A-7
DATE: 09/09/14
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report – Community Development
Title 3 Amendment
Cardroom Ordinance
Increase in the Maximum Number of Card Tables
Removal of Betting Limits
RECOMMENDATION:
Council adopt on second reading, by title only, the proposed ordinance amending the
City’s Cardroom Ordinance.
DISCUSSION:
This action consists of a proposed Municipal Code Text Amendment to Title 3. The
proposed text amendment consists of a revision to Section 3-5.105 that allows the
following:
Increase the number of card tables in Atascadero from five card tables to six card
tables;
Allow a single cardroom to operate all six card tables;
Remove the $500 betting limit, allowing the card room to allow unlimited betting
at their discretion;
Allow simultaneous hands or betting squares.
On August 12, 2014, the City Council held a hearing on the proposed Municipal Code
text changes and introduced for first reading, by title only, the Draft Ordinance on a 4-1
vote.
Analysis: City Staff, including the City Attorney and Police Chief , have met numerous
times over the past year with the applicant to refine the cardroom ordinance
amendment. In addition, the City Attorney has worked closely with the California
Gambling Commission on the proposed changes. The full text of the proposed changes
are contained in the attached draft ordinance.
ITEM NUMBER: A-7
DATE: 09/09/14
The City Attorney, Police Department, and California Bureau of Gambling Control have
all reviewed the proposed changes and have no objections to the proposed changes
and have considered the following:
Increasing the number of tables in Atascadero from five to six tables and allowing
a single cardroom to operate all of the tables would likely make Outlaws more
competitive with other cardroom in the County. Increased sales at Outlaws
would have a modest economic benefit to the City of Atascadero.
Code text change increasing the number of card tables
The Police Department is not concerned with the removal of the $500 betting
limit. Crime has not been an issue with the local card room and there is no
evidence State wide that there are any public safety issues related to unlimited
betting. According to Ms. Brown, unlimited betting will only be allowed on a
limited basis and is primarily needed for marketing purposes.
Allowing simultaneous hands or betting squares will allow the cardroom to offer
games like Black Jack the option to split hands.
ITEM NUMBER: A-7
DATE: 09/09/14
Code text change removing betting limits and allowing simultaneous hands
FISCAL IMPACT:
The amendment should have a modest positive fiscal impact on the City.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Ordinance A
ITEM NUMBER: A-7
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
DRAFT ORDINANCE A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO AMENDING TITLE 3 OF THE ATASCADERO
MUNICIPAL CODE, AMENDING THE CARDROOM ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, an application has been received from Dora Brown, owner of Outlaws Card
Parlour requesting amendment to Section 3-5.105 of the Card Room ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council held a public hearing to consider the proposed
ordinance amendments at a regular meeting on August 12, 2014, where public testimony was
considered prior to making a decision; and,
WHEREAS, for all of the reasons set forth herein, the City Council of the City of
Atascadero (“City”) desires to amend its requirements regarding the number of gambling tables
and betting limits in the City; and,
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero DOES ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. The City Council finds as follows.
The legislature, in enacting the Gambling Control Act, indicated its intent to have
concurrent jurisdiction with local governments over gambling establishments in the State
and to provide uniform, minimum standards of regulations of permissible gambling
activities and the operation of lawful gambling establishments. As long as it is not
inconsistent with the Act, any City or county has the authority to prohibit any gambling
activity and impose more stringent local controls or conditions upon gambling than are
imposed by the Act or by the Commission. The City may also inspect gambling premises
to enforce applicable state and local laws, impose a local tax or license fee, and enact,
amend, or enforce any local ordinance relating to licensing of gambling establishments.
In 2005 the Legislature amended the Gambling Control Act to authorize a city or county
to amend its ordinance, without voter approval, to increase the number of tables allowed
in an gambling establishment up to 24.99%, or two tables, whichever is greater, when
compared to the number operated on January 1, 1996.
Any amendment to the city’s cardroom ordinance must be submitted to the Division of
Gambling Control for review and comment before the ordinance is adopted.
The City amends its ordinance to increase the number of card tables at any establishment
to four. In addition, in any amendment to the cardroom ordinance, the City will review
the other provisions in the ordinance, including hours of operation, work permits,
licenses, games played, and any fees or taxes imposed.
ITEM NUMBER: A-7
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
Section 2: Section 3-5-105 of the Atascadero Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
ITEM NUMBER: A-7
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
ITEM NUMBER: A-7
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
ITEM NUMBER: A-7
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
ITEM NUMBER: A-7
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
ITEM NUMBER: A-7
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
ITEM NUMBER: A-7
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
SECTION 3: A summary of this ordinance, approved by the City Attorney, together with the
ayes and noes, shall be published twice: at least five days prior to its final passage in the
Atascadero News, a newspaper published and circulated in the City of Atascadero, and; before
the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its final passage, in the Atascadero News, a newspaper
published and circulated in the City of Atascadero. A copy of the full text of this ordinance shall
be on file in the City Clerk’s Office on and aft er the date following introduction and passage and
shall be available to any interested member of the public.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on _____________, and PASSED
and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero, State of California, on
____________, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO
_____________________________ _________________________
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., Tom O’Malley, Mayor
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Brian Pierik, City Attorney
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report - Community Development Department
PLN 2014-1499
ZCH 2014-0173 / TPM 2014-0101 / CUP 2014-0282
4-Unit Single-Family Planned Development Overlay #7 (PD-7)
10380 El Camino Real
(Michaud / Henderson)
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Planning Commission Recommends the Council:
1. Adopt Resolution A certifying Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2014 -
0006; and,
2. Introduce for first reading, by title only, Draft Ordinance A approving Zone
Change 2014-0173 for a Planned Development #7 overlay, based on findings;
and,
3. Adopt Resolution B approving Conditional Use Permit 2014-0282 to include the
Master Plan of Development based on findings and subject to Conditions of
Approval and Mitigation Monitoring; and,
4. Adopt Resolution C approving Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 2014-0101, based
on findings and subject to Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring.
REPORT-IN-BRIEF:
The proposed project consists of an application for a Zone Change, Conditional Use
Permit (CUP) and Tentative Tract Map. The Zone Change request would place a
Planned Development #7 overlay on the site, subject to a Master Plan of Development
(CUP) that would allow four (4) new single-family residences to be constructed. The
Tentative Parcel Map would create a four (4) lot subdivision on the existing 0.37 acre lot
at 10380 El Camino Real.
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
DISCUSSION:
Situation and Facts:
1. Applicant/Representative: Frank Henderson, 2029 Alturas Rd.
Atascadero CA 93422
2. Owners: Leo & Carol Michaud, 8090 Cristobal Ave.
Atascadero, CA 93422
3. Project Address: 10380 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422
(San Luis Obispo County) APN 056-383-021
4. General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential (MDR)
5. Zoning District: Residential Multifamily-10 (RMF-10)
6. Site Area: 0.37 acres
7. Existing Use: Vacant
8. Environmental Status: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2014-0006
Background: On August 5, 2014 the Planning Commission held a public hearing for the
proposed project and zoning code amendment and recommended that the City C ouncil
approve the proposed project, on a 6 -0 vote.
The project site is a vacant undeveloped parcel in the Residential Multi -Family-10
(RMF-10) zone. The Zoning Ordinance allows the establishment of a Planned
Development Overlay No. 7 (PD-7) in the Multi-Family Zone, which requires a minimum
of 4 single-family units, consistent with the PD-7 site development standards and
appearance review, as analyzed within this report. The PD-7 overlay zone was
originally established in 1987 to allow for the creation of detached single-family homes
on individual lots within the City’s multi-family zoning district.
Properties to the north, south, and east are Residential Multi Family–10, primarily
developed with small lot single-family homes. The subject property is located across
the street from the Atascadero State Hospital.
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Surrounding Land Use and Setting:
North: SFR uses/ Multi-family zone East: Atascadero State Hospital / Public zone
South: SFR uses/ Multi-family zone West: SFR uses/ Multi-family zone
Project location: 10380
El Camino Real
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Analysis: The proposed project consists of a four-lot residential subdivision on a 0.37
acre (16,239 square foot) parcel under the requirements of a PD-7 Overlay Zoning
District. The proposed lot sizes are approximately 4,086 square feet each.
Each home is designed with a two-car attached garage with additional uncovered
spaces provided in the driveway to fulfill the guest-parking requirement. Each unit is
consistent with the PD-7 requirement of providing a minimum 40% parcel landscaping,
and building footprints of less than 35% of the parcel area. Each lot is proposed to
utilize the same floor plan for a 1,423 square foot home.
A Master Plan of Development will include all site development and architectural design
standards for the project. The Master Plan of Development will be approved in the form
of a Conditional Use Permit as required by the Zoning Ordinance. The Planning
Commission can make any future amendments to the Master Plan of Development in
the future.
Project Summary Table
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Appearance Review
DRC Review
The Design Review Committee discussed the proposed project on May 28, 2014. The
DRC made the following recommendations to the Planning Commission and City
Council regarding the project proposal:
1. Architecture: The DRC recommended revisions to architecture as follows:
a. Increase porch projection to include a minimum of 5-feet
b. Lowering of the porch roofline
c. Variety of materials and colors to provide for articulation of the design
features. The DRC did not recommend the addition of a stone base
treatment.
d. The inclusion of high quality architectural grade garage doors.
2. Fencing: The DRC recommended elimination of the fencing at the terminus of the
shared driveway at the edge of the drainage easement. Fencing is to remain at
the rear yard of unit 4.
3. Trash service: The DRC deferred to the Planning Commission for discussion and
recommendation for alternatives.
4. Driveway maintenance: The DRC recommended establishment of a maintenance
agreement over an HOA based on the size of the project.
Modifications have been made to the plans by the applicant to address DRC
recommendations. Conditions of approval have been included in the attached
resolutions regarding paint colors, materials, and garage doors of the units, trash
service and on-site shared maintenance.
Site Plan, Circulation, Parking
The site plan has been proposed to meet the requirements of the Atascadero Municipal
Code and the appearance review requirements of the General Plan. Planned
Development #7 requires specific building and garage setbacks. Staff has reviewed
each lot and building placement for setback consistency. A fire truck turnaround in
provided between lots 3 and 4 which shall be signed for no parking.
Access is provided off of El Camino Real via a 20-foot wide shared driveway. Each lot
contains two (2) covered parking spaces in the attached garage with two (2) additional
uncovered guest parking spaces in the private driveway, consistent with the PD-7
requirements.
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Site Plan
El Camino Real
Single-family residential
house on a small 4,086
square foot lot
Front door with covering
Individual waste storage
Shared driveway /
common maintenance
Fire Department turn
around
All parking in driveways
and garages
Typical front yard
landscape areas by
developer
Public Drainage
Easement
Fenced rear yards to be
landscaped by owner
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Proposed Color Board
Architecture, Materials, Color
The applicant is proposing a traditional 2-story home design with wood siding,
articulated roof lines, eaves, contrasting two tone color scheme with building trim, and
trellis elements. There is one floor plan design which is proposed to be repeated on
each of the four lots. The west elevation on Lot 1 would be enhanced with a larger
porch entryway feature for architectural enhancement facing El Camino Real.
Per PD-7 standards, the upper floor is designed to step back from the ground floor
façade to break up the massing and increase opportunities for architectural articulation.
The associated PD-7 standards include provisions requiring that the second floor be a
maximum of 75% of the main floor area and that the rear setback increase from 10-feet
to 15-feet for the upper floor.
A color board has been submitted by the applicant, which proposes to utilize the same
color scheme on all of the four units. The applicant has stated that he is agreeable to
revising the color scheme to include more historical color palette with deep earth toned
colors and traditional trim accents. A condition has been included in the resolution that
the applicant work with staff to modify the color board, and that four distinct color
schemes be provided for each of the four units.
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Elevations
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conceptual Landscape Plan
Landscape Design
A preliminary landscape plan has been designed as a conceptual plan with limited plant
materials. Staff has included a condition of approval requiring that a complete
landscape and irrigation plan be prepared by a landscape professional and submitted
with building permits. Plant densities shall be increased to provide co verage in the front
yard and visible side yards of each unit. A mixture of drought tolerant trees, shrubs and
ground cover shall be utilized to create a complete landscape with closer plant spacing
according to the size of the plant species . Street trees shall be provided along the El
Camino Real frontage and along the interior shared driveway. Landscape maintenance
will be the responsibility of the individual property owner.
.
Atascadero Municipal Code Section 9-4.125 (Landscape Standards) requires that a 5-
foot landscape setback be provided along the property line of multi-family parcels. This
is required in order to visually soften and add greenery to the property line, especially
where an asphalt driveway is bordered by solid property line fencing. An exception to
this requirement is allowed in locations where a reciprocal access easement exists with
the adjacent lot. The applicant has designed the subdivision without the landscape
Only a few plants
identified in each
planter area.
Condition to include
complete landscape
coverage and closer
plant spacing
Asphalt driveway
directly adjacent to
wood fence; no
landscaped side
setback provided.
Easement proposed to
provide future access
to adjacent parcel.
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
setback and is proposing to provide an easement for future shared access with
neighboring parcel to the south. The adjacent parcel is currently developed with one
single-family residence, and is not proposing to subdivide at this time. However, there
is future potential for subdivision of this adjacent parcel to the south, and with the
easement, access to the future subdivision would be provided on the driveway of the
10380 El Camino Real parcel. A condition has been included that the access easement
be dedicated on the subject parcel at time of Final Map.
Trash Service
Trash and recycling is proposed as individual bin containers for each lot. All trash
storage units will be screened from view behind fence s in the rear side yards. The
Atascadero Waste Management company has stated that they will provide individual
trash pick-up along the interior shared driveway, provided that their trucks are able to
utilize the fire truck turn around area so that they do not have to back up onto El Camino
Real. A release form will be required to be signed by the property owner to allow the
trucks to utilize the private asphalt driveway for pick up.
Due to the property location directly on El Camino Real, the City Public Works
Department has concerns regarding trash pick-up on the main arterial street. Each bin
must be placed 3-feet apart and there is a potential for up to 12 bins along the projec t
frontage. This would conflict with the existing on -street parking and bike lanes on El
Camino Real, creating an ongoing problem. Trash trucks having to stop in the driving
lane to pick up the bins on the arterial and would block traffic. Therefore, the project is
conditioned that in the event that Waste Management determines pick -up cannot be
provided on the interior shared driveway, then a shared dumpster shall be provided on
site, to be located at the back of fire truck turnaround.
Wastewater
The four units on the project site will connect to the existing City sewer service in El
Camino Real.
Site Drainage & Stormwater
Due to the limited area of onsite detention/retention, site drainage has been designed to
flow into an underground detention facility. The underground storage will utilize
StormTech chambers located under the shared driveway, which will both intercept and
retain the stormwater. A preliminary hydrology analysis has been submitted to show
that the proposed underground facility will fulfill the City requirement to maintain historic
site run-off; run-off shall not be increased by the proposed development. Overflow
during heavy rain events will be released into the existing common drainage channel
along the west property line, which is currently within a public drainage easement. LID
best management practices will be incorporated into the overall site and individual unit
designs to comply with stormwater requirements.
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Drainage Feature/ Wetland Area
There is an existing drainage swale at the rear of the property which is designated as a
jurisdictional wetland by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). The
drainage swale is within a public drainage easement which collects water from the
surrounding neighborhood. The drainage feature, known as “Perkins Ditch” is
characterized as a freshwater wetland dominated by cattail. The City has a CDFW
maintenance permit to do mowing and other maintenance in this area according to the
permit allowances. Maintenance of this public drainage easement is typically done bi-
annually, as feasible; however, the City does not guarantee maintenance on a regular
basis.
A biological report / wetland assessment was completed by Terra Verde Environmental
Consulting on May 2, 2014, in order to assess the drainage feature and determine
jurisdictional analysis and recommendations to avoid and/or minimize po tential project
related impacts. Recommendations have been incorporated as mitigation measures in
the proposed Draft Mitigated Negative Decla ration. An 11-foot setback is provided
between the proposed development and the centerline of the swale. All proposed
development is located beyond the top of bank of the drainage feature and outside
CDFW jurisdictional limits. Fencing shall be installed during construction to protect the
drainage area.
In order to maintain protection of the biological area and limit public access in the
drainage easement, Staff is recommending that a 5-foot wrought iron/black tubular view
fence be installed across the rear property line at the back of the project to block access
to the swale. A gate could be installed in order to allow the property owner on Lot 4 to
access the exterior side of the unit adjacent to the swale and to allow City maintenance
staff to access the easement if needed. The option of whether or not to include the
fence was discussed throughout the project development process, but was not included
in the resolutions which were drafted and adopted by the Planning Commission on
August 5, 2014. For the September 9, 2014 City Council review, Staff will be
recommending to the City Council that a condition be added to have the developer
install open view fencing along the entire length of public drainage easement on the
subject property to limit access.
Native Tree Removal
Three (3) small live oak trees, ranging in size from 5 -inches to 9-inches DBH, are
proposed for removal. The trees are located along the southern property line, adjacent
to the neighbor’s residence, and are not associated with the drainage area or wetland to
the west of the site. All of the trees removed as part of the project shall be mitigated
according to the Atascadero Native Tree Ordinance by either payment of mitigation fees
to the native tree fund, or replanting on site.
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Affordable Housing
The City Council’s Inclusionary Affordable Housing Program states that all residential
developments that require a legislative approval shall either provide deed restricted
affordable units or pay affordable housing in -lieu fees. This program requires the
proposed project to either provide one deed-restricted moderate-income unit for a 30-
year period, or pay an in-lieu fee equivalent to 5% of the construction value of each
residence. This condition has been included in the attached resolutions.
Project Benefits
As with all Planned Development overlay districts, certain development standards are
modified in exchange for high quality architectural and site design, affordable housing
provisions, and the establishment of financial mechanisms to cover any increased costs
to police and fire services associated with the new development.
One of the required findings for approval of a planned development rezone is that the
project offers certain redeeming features and public benefit to compensate for the
requested modification and smaller lot sizes allowed by the planned development
zoning. The benefits are divided into two levels, Tier 1 and Tier 2. All of the Tier 1
benefits are considered by the City Council to be mandatory elem ents of a Planned
Development project. Tier 2 benefits will not apply to all projects but should be
incorporated when applicable. The City Council must find that the project meets all of
the Tier 1 benefits as underlined below, including higher quality architectural and
landscape design and affordable housing.
PD Location Tier 1 Benefits Tier 2 Benefits
Inside of Urban Core
PD-7
PD-17
Custom PD’s
a) Affordable / Workforce Housing
b) High Quality Architectural Design
c) High Quality Landscape Design
d) Buffering between Urban and
Suburban zones (large lot sizes,
increased setbacks, landscape
buffers, etc.)
e) Higher density to meet Housing
Element goals
a) Pocket Parks in larger projects
b) Trails / Walkways for Pedestrian
Connectivity
c) Historic Preservation
Tentative Parcel Map
A four (4)-lot parcel map is proposed as part of the project consistent with the Master
Plan of Development. The Parcel Map has been conditioned by the City Engineer to
meet all City standards. The applicant will be required to record CC&R’s for t he map
that will include maintenance and access of any common areas, including the project
underground drainage detention basins, shared driveway, and south property line fence.
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
General Plan Consistency
The General Plan MDR land use designation permits a maximum density of 10 dwelling
units per acre with the approval of the Planned Development Overlay Zone.
Implementing General Plan programs requires appearance review of architectural
design, materials, street trees, and landscaping to maintain and retain the rural
atmosphere of the city, and to protect the environment and incorporate architectural
themes into the site and building design.
The proposed project is consistent with the following General Plan Land Use and
Housing Element Policies:
Land Use Policy 1.1: “Preserve the rural atmosphere of the community and assure
“elbow room” in areas designed for lower density development by guiding new
development into the Urban Core to conform to the historic Colony land use patterns of
the City and to respect the natural environment, hillside area and existing
neighborhoods”.
Land Use Program 1.1.7: “Within the Urban Core encourage infill development or
revitalization or reuse of land already committed to urban development where utilities
and public services exist.”
The Planning Commission has determined that the project is consistent with the goals
and policies of the Land Use Element and the Housing Element. The project will
provide four (4) new single-family dwellings that fulfill an important housing need within
the community. As conditioned, the project incorporates architectural and landscape
elements that are consistent with the character of the surrounding neighborhood, and
the General Plan’s appearance review requirement.
Findings:
Planned Development Overlay
The following findings for the proposed Zone Change for a planned development
overlay shall be made in order to approve the proposed project:
1. Modification of development standards or processing requirements is
warranted to promote orderly and harmonious development.
2. Modification of development standards or processing requirements will
enhance the opportunity to best utilize special characteristics of an area and
will have a beneficial effect on the area.
3. Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably achieved
through existing development standards or processing requirements.
4. The proposed project offers certain redeeming features to compensate for the
requested zone change.
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditional Use Permit (Master Plan of Development)
As previously mentioned, a Master Plan of Development is required for the PD-7, and is
approved through the Conditional Use Permit process. The proposed Master Plan of
Development sets development standards related to architectural design, site design,
landscape, signage, and specific development standards required by the zoning
ordinance. The Conditional Use Permit process provides the opportunity for the public,
the Planning Commission, and the City Council to review the specifics of land use
proposals, such as architectural design, site design, landscape, and specific standards
of the Zoning Ordinance. The following five findings must be made to approve a
Conditional Use Permit:
1. The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan and the C ity’s
Appearance Review Manual.
Staff Comment: The use and appearance is consistent with the Medium Density
Residential designation of the General Plan and General Plan Land Use Element
Policy 1.1 and 1.1.7. The project has been reviewed by the Design Review
Committee and found to be consistent with the Appearance Review Manual , as
conditioned.
2. The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Title (Zoning
Ordinance) including the PD-7 Ordinance.
Staff Comment: As conditioned, the project satisfies all PD-7 Zoning Code
provisions, incorporating high-quality architectural and neighborhood design.
3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not,
because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons residing
or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property
or improvements in the vicinity of the use.
Staff Comment: The proposed residential project will not be detrimental to the
general public or working persons’ health, safety, or welfare.
4. That the proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the character or the
immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development.
Staff Comment: The project has been designed to be consistent with the existing
neighborhood character, with detached single-family homes on small multifamily
zoned lots. An access easement will be provided to allow shared ac cess to the
adjacent parcel to the south when that lot develops.
5. That the proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the
safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
improved in conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the
surrounding neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance
with the Land Use Element.
Staff Comment: The proposed project and use is consistent with the traffic
projections and road improvements anticipated within the General Plan. A single-
family residential subdivision use in the proposed location is consistent and
compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood. The General Plan
identifies this site as Multi-Family Residential with a maximum density of 10 dwelling
units per acre (du/ac) with a minimum lot area of 0.5 acres net. Smaller lot sizes
allowing up to 10 du/ac may be allowed through a Planned Development Overlay.
Based on staff’s analysis in the preceding sections, it appears that all of the required
findings for approval of a Master Plan of Development (Conditional Use Permit) can be
made. The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan Land Use and Housing
Elements.
Proposed Environmental Determination
Staff has prepared a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration that was circulated to public
agencies and interested members of the public on July 17, 2014. The Environmental
Analysis identified concerns regarding potential impacts to aesthetics, air quality,
biology, cultural resources, geology and soils, water quality, noise, and traffic.
Mitigation measures pertaining to these areas are included. A finding is proposed that
this project would not have a significant effect on the environme nt based upon the
implementation of the identified mitigation measures.
Planning Commission is recommending that the City Council certify Proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration 2014-0006. No written public comments were received during the
public review period for the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
Conclusion: The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and Atascadero
Municipal Code, as analyzed within this staff report. The project has been reviewed by
the City’s Design Review Committee and recommendations have been included in the
revised plans and/or conditioned in the attached resolutions. As analyzed within the
project Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration, the proposed Master Plan
of Development would have no signif icant environmental impacts and will not be
detrimental to the general public or working person’s health, safety, or welfare. The
Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed project and recommends that the City
Council approve the 4-unit planned development as conditioned.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Based on findings from the Taussig Study, revenue from new residential development ,
including property tax revenues, vehicle licensing fees, sales taxes, and other revenues ,
is insufficient to cover the maintenance and emergency services costs of new
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
development. Based on the revenue projections from the Taussig Study, the City has
developed standard conditions of approval for new development projects that require
the cost of maintenance and emergency services to be f unded by the project. A
standard condition of approval has been included requiring emergency services and
facility maintenance costs to be 100% funded by the project by annexing into the City’s
Community Facilities District. Annexation shall occur prior to final map acceptance.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. The Council may make modifications to the project and/or conditions of approval
for the project.
2. The Council may determine more information is needed on some aspect of the
project and may refer the item back to th e applicant and staff to develop the
additional information. The Council should clearly state the type of information
required and move to continue the item to a future date.
3. The Council may deny the project. The parcel would retain its designation of
Residential Multifamily -10. The Council should specify the reasons for denial of
the project make findings for such action.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1: Location Map, General Plan, and Zoning
Attachment 2: Supplemental Perspective Drawings by Applicant
Attachment 3: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study
Attachment 4: Draft Resolution A
Attachment 5: Draft Ordinance A
Attachment 6: Draft Resolution B
Attachment 7: Draft Resolution C
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Attachment 1: Location Map, General Plan, and Zoning
Existing Designations:
-General Plan: Medium Density Residential
-Zoning District: Residential Multi-Family - 10
Proposed Designations:
-General Plan: Medium Density Residential
-Zoning District: Residential Multi-Family – 10 / Planned Development #7 overlay
Project location: 10380
El Camino Real
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Attachment 2: Perspective Drawings by Applicant
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Attachment 3: Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study
See following
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
PROPOSED MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION #2014-0006
6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 805/461-5035
Findings:
1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment.
2. The project will not achieve short-term goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals and policies.
3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable.
4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly.
Determination:
Based on the above findings, and the information contained in the Initial Study 2014-0006 (made a part hereof by
reference and on file in the Community Development Department), it has been determined that the above project will
not have an adverse impact on the environment when the following mitigation measures are incorporated into the
project (see attachments).
Prepared By: Callie Taylor, Senior Planner
Date Posted: July 17, 2014
Public Review Ends: August 5, 2014
Attachments: - Location/ Zoning Map
- Aerial Map
- Site/Landscape Plan
- Tentative Parcel Map #AT 14-0028
- Grading Plan
- Floor Plans & Elevations
- Biological Report/Wetlands Assessment, Terra Verde Environmental
- Site Photos
- National Wetlands Inventory Map
- Hazard Risk Maps, EnviroStor Map, Airport Location Relative to Project Site
- Tsunami Inundation Risk
- Initial Study 2014-0006
Applicant/Owner: Leo Michaud, 8090 Cristobal Ave. Atascadero, CA 93422
Project Title: 4-lot Planned Development #7 PLN 2014-1499
Zone Change 2014-0173 / Tentative Parcel Map 2014-0101 / Conditional Use Permit 2014-0282
Project Location: 10380 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422
(San Luis Obispo County) APN: 056-383-021
Project
Description:
The project consists of an application to subdivide an existing 0.37 acre lot at 10380 El Camino
Real in order to create a four (4) unit small lot single-family development in a multi-family
residential zone. The proposed project is an infill development within the City’s urban service
area, and is designed to be consistent with the standards of a Planned Development overlay zone
#7. Applications include a Zone Change (ZCH), Master Plan of Development (CUP), and a 4 lot
Tentative Parcel map (TPM). Each new lot is proposed at approxi mately 4,086 square feet in size.
One (1) detached single family residential unit, 1423 square feet in size, would be developed on
each lot. Each unit would have an attached 2 car garage and two (2) guest parking spaces located
in the private driveway. The units are proposed to be located off a shared driveway which takes
access off El Camino Real. There is a City maintained neighborhood drainage feature, known as
“Perkins Ditch” and characterized as a freshwater wetland dominated by cattail, which is located at
the rear of the property and will be avoided by the proposed development. All proposed
development is located beyond the top of bank of the drainage feature and outside CDFW
jurisdictional limits. Three (3) small live oak trees, ranging in size from 5-inches to 9-inches DBH,
are located along the southern property line and proposed for removal.
General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential (MDR)
Zoning District: Residential Multifamily-10 (RMF-10)
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
Environmental Review 2014-0006
Lead Agency Name
and Address:
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422
Contact Person and
Phone Number:
Callie Taylor, Senior Planner
City of Atascadero, Phone: (805) 470-3448
General Plan
Designation:
Medium Density Residential (MDR)
Zoning: Residential Multi-Family-10 (RMF-10)
Surrounding Land
Uses and Setting
East:
MDR
North: MDR, HDR
South: MDR
West: P
Other public
agencies whose
approval is required)
None
Applicant/Owner: Leo Michaud, 8090 Cristobal Ave. Atascadero, CA 93422
Project Title: 4-lot Planned Development #7 PLN 2014-1499
Zone Change 2014-0173 / Tentative Parcel Map 2014-0101 / Conditional Use Permit 2014-0282
Project Location: 10380 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422
(San Luis Obispo County) APN: 056-383-021
Project
Description:
The project consists of an application to subdivide an existing 0.37 acre lot at 10380 El Camino
Real in order to create a four (4) unit small lot single-family development in a multi-family
residential zone. The proposed project is an infill development within the City’s urban service area,
and is designed to be consistent with the standards of a Planned Development overlay zone #7.
Applications include a Zone Change (ZCH), Master Plan of Development (CUP), and a 4 lot
Tentative Parcel map (TPM). Each new lot is proposed at approximately 4,086 square feet in size.
One (1) detached single family residential unit, 1423 square feet in size, would be developed on
each lot. Each unit would have an attached 2 car garage and two (2) guest parking spaces located in
the private driveway. The units are proposed to be located off a shared driveway which takes access
off El Camino Real. There is a City maintained neighborhood drainage feature, known as “Perkins
Ditch” and characterized as a freshwater wetland dominated by cattail, which is located at the rear of
the property and will be avoided by the proposed development . All proposed development is
located beyond the top of bank of the drainage feature and outside CDFW jurisdictional limits.
Three (3) small live oak trees, ranging in size from 5-inches to 9-inches DBH, are located along the
southern property line and proposed for removal.
General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential (MDR)
Zoning District: Residential Multifamily-10 (RMF-10)
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Attachment 1
Location/ Zoning Map
Zoning: Residential Multi-Family-10
General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential
Surrounding Zoning: Residential Multi-Family-10, Residential Multi-Family-20, Public
Project location:
10380 El Camino
Real
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Attachment 2
Aerial Map
Project Site
10380 El Camino Real,
Atascadero
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Attachment 3
Site / Landscape Plan
El Camino Real frontage
1423 sq. ft. detached
Single-family residential
house on a small 4,000
square foot lot
Front door with covering
Shared driveway /
common maintenance
Fire Department turn
around
All parking in driveways
and garages
Front yard landscape
areas by developer
City maintained
drainage swale at rear
of lot to be avoided
Fenced rear yards to be
landscaped by owner
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Attachment 4
Tentative Parcel Map #AT 14-0028
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Attachment 5
Grading Plan
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Attachment 6
Floor Plans & Elevations
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Attachment 7
Biological Report, Wetland Assessment
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Attachment 8
Site Photos
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Attachment 9
National Wetlands Inventory Map
Project Site:
10380 El Camino
Real, Atascadero
No wetlands mapped on or adjacent
to project site per US Fish &
Wildlife Service Database
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Attachment 10
Hazard Risk Maps
Fire Hazard Risk
Note: High Fire severity zone
Project Site:
10380 El Camino
Real, Atascadero
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Flood Risk
Note: Not in or adjacent to flood zone
Project Site:
10380 El Camino
Real, Atascadero
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Landslide Risk
Project Site:
10380 El Camino
Real, Atascadero
Note: Low risk for landslide;
parcel is mostly flat
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Liquefaction Risk
Note: Low risk for liquefaction
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Fault Line Map
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Attachment 11
Department of Toxic Substances Control: EnviroStor
Project Site:
10830 El Camino Real,
Atascadero
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Attachment 12
Airport Location Relative to Project Site
10380 El Camino Real,
Atascadero
Paso Robles Airport-
Land Use Plan
Boundaries (2005)
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Attachment 13
Tsunami Inundation Risk
Project Site
10830 El Camino Real
Atascadero
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program
4-lot Planned Development #7 10380 El Camino Real
PLN 2014-1499 / ZCH 2014-0173 / TPM 2014-0101 /
CUP 2014-0282
Timing
FM: Final Map
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
TO: Temporary
Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
AMWC: Water Comp.
Mitigation
Measure
Mitigation Measure 1.d. 1: All lighting shall be designed to eliminate any
off site glare. All exterior site lights shall utilize full cut -off, “hooded”
lighting fixtures to prevent offsite light spillage and glare. Any lumin aire
pole height shall not exceed 12-feet in height, limit intensity to 2.0 foot
candles at ingress /egress. No light shall be permitted to spill off-site.
Fixtures shall be shield cut-off type.
BP BS/PS 1.d.1
Mitigation Measure 3.b.1: The project shall be conditioned to comply with
all applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust
(PM-10) as contained in Section 2 “Assessing and Mitigating Construction
Impacts.”
2.3.1 Standard Mitigation Measures for Construction Equi pment
Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to
manufacturer’s specifications;
Fuel all off-road and portable diesel power equipment with ARB
certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (non-taxed version suitable for
use off-road);
Use diesel construction equipment meeting ARB’s Tier 2 certified
engines or cleaner off-road heavy duty diesel engines, and
comply with State off-Road Regulations;
Use on-road heavy duty trucks that meet ARB’s 2007 or cleaner
certification standard for on-road heavy duty diesel engines, and
comply with State On-Road Regulation;
Construction or trucking companies with fleets that do not have
engines in their fleet that meet the engine standards identified in
the above two measures (e.g. captive or NOx exempt area fleets)
may be eligible by proving alternative compliance;
All on and off-road diesel equipment shall not idle for more than 5
minutes. Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas
and or job sites to remind drivers and operators of the 5 minute
idling limit;
Diesel idling within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors is not
permitted;
Staging and queuing areas shall not be located within 1,000 feet
of sensitive receptors;
Electrify equipment when feasible;
Substitute gasoline-powered in place of diesel-powered
equipment, where feasible; and
Use alternatively fueled construction equipment on - site where
feasible, such as compressed natural gas (CNG), liquefied natural
gas (LNG), propone or biodiesel.
2.4 Fugitive Dust Mitigation Measures: Expanded Li st
A. Reduce the amount of the disturbed areas where possible;
B. Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to
prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased watering
BP BS/PS 3.b.1
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program
4-lot Planned Development #7 10380 El Camino Real
PLN 2014-1499 / ZCH 2014-0173 / TPM 2014-0101 /
CUP 2014-0282
Timing
FM: Final Map
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
TO: Temporary
Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
AMWC: Water Comp.
Mitigation
Measure
frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15
mph. Reclaimed (non-potable) water should be used whenever
possible;
C. All dirt stock pile areas should be sprayed daily as needed;
D. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved
project revegetation and landscape plans should be implemented
as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing
activities;
E. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates
greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with a
fast germinating, non-invasive grass seed and water until
vegetation is established;
F. All disturbed soil area not subject to revegetation should be
stabilized using approved chemical soil binder, jute netting, or
other methods approved in advance by the APCD;
G. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. to be paved s hould be
completed as soon as possible. In addition, building pads should
be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil
binders are used;
H. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15
mph on any unpaved surface at the c onstruction site;
I. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to
be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard
(minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer)
in accordance with CVC Section 23114;
J. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved
roads onto streets, or wash off trucks and equipment leaving the
site;
K. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is
carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with
reclaimed water should be used where feasible;
L. All of these fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be shown on
grading and building plans;
M. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or person to
monitor the fugitive dust emissions and enhance the
implementation of the measures as necessary to minimize dust
complains, reduce visible emission below 20% opacity, and to
prevent transport of dust offsite. Their duties shall include
holidays and weekend periods when work may not be in progress.
The name and telephone number of such persons shall be
provided to the APCD Compliance Division prior to the start of
any grading, earthwork or demolition.
Mitigation Measure 3.b.2: The project shall be conditioned to comply with
all applicable APCD regulations pertaining to Naturally Occurring Asbestos
(NOA). Prior to any grading activities a geologic evaluation should be
conducted to determine if NOA is present within the area that will be
disturbed. If NOA is not present, and exemptions request must be filed with
the District. If NOA is found at the site, the applicant must comply with all
requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM. This may include
development of an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan and an Asbestos Health
BP BS/PS 3.b.2
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program
4-lot Planned Development #7 10380 El Camino Real
PLN 2014-1499 / ZCH 2014-0173 / TPM 2014-0101 /
CUP 2014-0282
Timing
FM: Final Map
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
TO: Temporary
Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
AMWC: Water Comp.
Mitigation
Measure
and Safety program for approval by the APCD. Technical Appendix 4.4 of
the SLO County APCD CEQA Air Quality Handbook includes a map of
zones throughout San Luis Obispo County where NOA has been found
and geological evaluation is required prior to any grading.
Mitigation Measure 3.b.3: The project shall be conditioned to comply with
all applicable APCD regulations pertaining to demolition. Demolition
activities can have potential negative air quality impacts, including issues
surrounding proper handling, demolition, and disposal of asbestos
containing material (ACM). Asbestos containing materials
could be encountered during demolition of existing buildings or can also be
found in utility pipes/pipelines (transite pipes or insulation on pipes). If
utility pipelines are scheduled for removal or relocation or a building(s) is
proposed to be removed or renovated, various regulatory requirements
may apply, including the requirements stipulated in the National Emission
Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (40CFR61, Subpart M - asbestos
NESHAP). These requirements include but are not limited to: 1) notification
to the APCD, 2) an asbestos survey conducted by a Certified Asbestos
Inspector, and, 3) applicable removal and disposal requirements of
identified ACM.
BP BS/PS 3.b.3
Mitigation Measure 3.b.4: Developmental burning of vegetative material is
prohibited within San Luis Obispo County. There shall be no
developmental burning of vegetation on site.
BP BS/PS 3.b.4
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.1: All construction, structures, permanent fences
and grading shall be located beyond the top of bank of the rear drainage
feature known as “Perkins Ditch”. There shall be no removal of vegetation
surrounding the wetland or drainage feature. An 11 foot setback shall be
maintained to the centerline of the drainage ditch according to the
proposed site section drawings (MND Attachment 6.)
BP BS/PS 4.b.c.1
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.2: High‐visibility flagging or fencing shall be
installed along the top of the bank to ensure that the drainage feature is
avoided during construction. Signage will be also installed in association
with the flagging/fencing designating the drainage feature as an
environmentally sensitive area. All construction activities and personnel
shall remain outside of the flagged/fenced area, and flagging/fencing shall
be maintained for the duration of
construction.
BP BS/PS 4.b.c.2
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.3: No refueling or maintenance of vehicles or
equipment shall occur within 100 feet of the drainage feature.
BP BS/PS 4.b.c.3
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.4: Spill clean‐up kits and secondary containment
shall be made available and used to prevent spills or leaks from entering
the drainage.
BP BS/PS 4.b.c.4
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.5: Appropriate Best Management Practices (e.g.,
silt fencing, straw wattles, etc.) shall be installed, as necessary, to avoid
BP BS/PS 4.b.c.5
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program
4-lot Planned Development #7 10380 El Camino Real
PLN 2014-1499 / ZCH 2014-0173 / TPM 2014-0101 /
CUP 2014-0282
Timing
FM: Final Map
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
TO: Temporary
Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
AMWC: Water Comp.
Mitigation
Measure
and/or minimize silt and sedimentation impacts to the drainage feature.
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.6: Any graded areas shall be stabilized with
erosion control hydroseed consisting of native species matching the
existing plant species within the tributary stream. The seed and plant
material shall not contain any introduced plant species. See biological
report for identified plant species.
BP BS/PS 4.b.c.6
Mitigation Measure 4.e.1: All tree removals shall be mitigated according to
the Atascadero Native Tree Ordinance. Mitigation shall include either
replanting on site, or payment of mitigation fees to the Native Tree fund.
BP PS 4.e.1
Mitigation Measure 4.e.2: Grading and excavation and grading work shall
be consistent with the City of Atascadero Tree Ordinance. Special
precautions when working around native trees include:
1. All existing trees outside of the limits of work shall remain.
2. Earthwork shall not exceed the limits of the project area.
3. Low branches in danger of being torn from trees shall be pruned
prior to any heavy equipment work being done.
4. Vehicles and stockpiled material shall be stored outside the drip
line of all trees.
5. All trees within the area of work shall be fenced for protection with
4-foot chain link, snow or safety fencing placed per the approved
tree protection plan. Tree protection fencing shall be in place
prior to any site excavation or grading. Fencing shall remain in
place until completion of all construction activities.
6. Any roots that are encountered during excavation shall be clean
cut by hand and sealed with an approved tree seal.
BP PS 4.e.2
Mitigation 5.b.1: In the event that archaeological resources are discovered
on the property, all work on the project shall stop. When a project will
impact an archeological site, the Atascadero Community Development
Department shall first determine whether the site is a historical resource. If
a lead agency determines that the archaeological site is an historical
resource, it shall refer to the Public Resources Code Sections for
guidance. If an archaeological resource is neither a unique archaeological
nor an historical resource, the effects of the project on those resources
shall not be considered a significant effect on the environment.
BP/GP PS/BS 5.b.1
Mitigation 5.d.1: In the event that human remains are discovered on the
property, all work on the project shall stop and the Atascadero Police
Department and the County Coroner shall be contacted. The Atascadero
Community Development Department shall be notified. If the human
remains are identified as being Native American, the California Native
American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be contacted at (916) 373 -
3710 within 24 hours. A representative from listed tribes shall be notified
and present during the excavation of any remains.
Ongoing PS 5.d.1
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program
4-lot Planned Development #7 10380 El Camino Real
PLN 2014-1499 / ZCH 2014-0173 / TPM 2014-0101 /
CUP 2014-0282
Timing
FM: Final Map
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
TO: Temporary
Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
AMWC: Water Comp.
Mitigation
Measure
Mitigation Measure 6.b.1: Any grading permit application plans shall
include erosion control measures to prevent soil, dirt, and debris from
entering the storm drain system during and after construction. A separate
plan shall be submitted for this purpose and shall be subject to review and
approval by City Staff at the time of Building Permit application.
BP BS/PS 6.b.1
Mitigation Measure 6.b.2: All cut and fill slopes shall be hydro seeded with
an appropriate erosion control method (erosion control blanket, hydro -
mulch, or straw mulch appropriately anchored) immediately after
completion of earthwork. All disturbed slopes shall have appropriate
erosion control methods in place. Duration of the project: The contractor
will be responsible for the clean-up of any mud or debris that is tracked
onto public streets by construction vehicles.
BP BS/PS 6.b.2
Mitigation Measure 6.c.d.1: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the
applicant will submit a soils report to Building Department. The building
plans will be required to follow the recommendations of the soils report to
assure safety for residents and buildings. The soils report will ensure that
the proposed project site and building location will not be subject to
geological events.
BP BS/PS 6.c.d.1
Mitigation Measure 9.e.f.1: The developer is responsible for ensuring that
all contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such
measures are implemented. Failure to comply with the approved
construction Best Management Practices will result in the issuance of
correction notices, citations, or stop orders.
BP BS/PS 9.e.f.1
Mitigation Measure 9.e.2.
i) Limit disturbance of creeks and natural drainage feature
ii) Minimize compaction of highly permeable soils
iii) Limit clearing and grading of native vegetation at the site to the
minimum area needed to build the project, allow access, and
provide fire protection.
iv) Minimize impervious surfaces by concentra ting improvements on
the least-sensitive portions of the site, while leaving the
remaining land in a natural undisturbed state
v) Minimize storm water runoff by implementing one of more of the
following site design measures:
(1) Direct roof runoff into cisterns or rain barrels for reuse
(2) Direct roof runoff onto vegetated areas safely away from
building foundations and footings, consistent with
California Building code
(3) Direct runoff from sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios,
driveways, and/or uncovered parking lots on to
vegetated areas safely away from building foundations
and footings, consistent with California building code
(4) Construct driveways uncovered parking lots, walkways,
and patios with permeable surfaces. (Central Coast
Water Control Board, 2013)
BP BS/PS 9.e.2.
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
Exhibit A
Mitigation Monitoring Program
4-lot Planned Development #7 10380 El Camino Real
PLN 2014-1499 / ZCH 2014-0173 / TPM 2014-0101 /
CUP 2014-0282
Timing
FM: Final Map
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
TO: Temporary
Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
AMWC: Water Comp.
Mitigation
Measure
Mitigation Measure 12.d.1: All construction activities shall comply with the
City of Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours of operation.
BP BS/PS 12.d.1
Mitigation Measure 16. e.1: The proposed home shall be compliant with
Atascadero Fire Department Standards including the appropriate slope of
driveway, materials used to construct the driveway (paved), and a required
fire turnaround on site. (Atascadero Fire Department)
BP BS/PS 16.e.1
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forest
Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology /Soils
Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology / Water
Quality
Land Use / Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation/Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Mandatory Findings of
Significance
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have
been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the en vironment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant effect” or “potentially significant
unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an
earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures
based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there
WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been
analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards
and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION,
including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
Callie Taylor, Senior Planner Date
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14
MND PART 2
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the
information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is
adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to
projects like the one involved (e.g., the proje ct falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be
explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not
expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis).
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on-site, cumulative as
well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, and then the checklist
answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less
than significant. "Potentially Significant Impac t" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may
be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an
EIR is required.
4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant W ith Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of
mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant
Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect
to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from "Earlier Analyses," as described in (5) below, may be
cross-referenced).
5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA pr ocess, an effect has
been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief
discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for re view.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such
effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated,"
describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and t he
extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential
impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a p reviously prepared or outside document
should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals
contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should
normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environment al effects in
whatever format is selected.
9) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impac t to less than significance.
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14 Page 38
MND PART 2
Initial Study 2014-0006
4-lot Planned Development #7
10380 El Camino Real PLN 2014-1499
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
1. AESTHETICS -- Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not
limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
SOURCES: Project Description, Site Plan, Elevation Drawings, California Department of Transportation
DISCUSSION:
1.a. The proposed project does not obscure a designated scenic vista. A scenic vista is described as a “viewpoint that
provides expansive views of a highly valued landscape for the benefit of the general public.” (CEQA Guidelines). The
property is a vacant infill residential multifamily site, surrounded by similar multifamily and single -family residences.
1.b. The proposed project will not substantially damage scenic resources. Trees proposed for removal will be
mitigated according to the Atascadero Native Tree Ordinance. The project site is not near a state scenic highway and
does not contain an historic structure. The project site will not disturb any rock outcroppings.
1.c. The proposed project is within the character of the surrounding area. The site is currently vacant and previously
graded, with very little vegetation on site. The new homes will be bordered by other multifamily and single-family
residences. Reference Attachment 1 of the most current aerial of project site .
1.d. New single family residences at this location are not expected to generate substantial light or glare. All proposed
lighting will be residential in nature. Project conditions will require any lighting at this site to be designated to eliminate
off site glare.
Mitigation Measure 1.d. 1: All lighting shall be designed to eliminate any off site glare. All exterior site lights shall
utilize full cut-off, “hooded” lighting fixtures to prevent offsite light spillage and glare. Any luminaire pole height shall
not exceed 12-feet in height, limit intensity to 2.0 foot candles at ingress /egress. No light shall be permitted to spill off-
site. Fixtures shall be shield cut-off type.
2. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST RESOURCES -- In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are
significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site
Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing
impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are
significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of
Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment
Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and the forest carbon measurement methodology provided in the
Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland
of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown o n the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract?
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14 Page 39
MND PART 2
Initial Study 2014-0006
4-lot Planned Development #7
10380 El Camino Real PLN 2014-1499
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of,
forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section
12220(g)), timberland (as defined in Public Resources Code
Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production
(as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))??
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest
land to non-forest use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which,
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of
farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land
to non-forest use?
SOURCES: Site Plan, Department of Conservation, Atascadero General Plan
DISCUSSION
2.a. The property is not shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of
the California Resources Agency as prime farmland.
2.b. The property is not in an agricultural zone and is not under a Williamson Act contract.
2.c. The project does not involve rezoning of forest land or timberland.
2.d.e.. The project will not result in a loss of forest land and will not result in a conversion of forest land to non-forest
use or farmland to non-agricultural uses.
3. AIR QUALITY -- Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or
air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable
air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially
to an existing or projected air quality violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air
quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed
quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number
of people?
SOURCES: Air Pollution Control District (APCD) CEQA Air Quality Handbook, 2012; Project Description, Site Plan
DISCUSSION:
3. a.c.) The proposed project consists of four (4) new residential units located on a previously graded, relatively flat
infill development site totaling less than one-half acre in size. According to the Operational Screening Criteria for
Project Air Quality Analysis (SLOAPCD, 2012), Single Family Housing development of this size will not exceed the
particular matter or APCD Daily Ozone Precursor Significance Threshold of 25 lbs ROG+NOx/Day from Operational
Impacts. Therefore, air quality impacts resulting from the project’s 4 new residential units are considered to be less
than significant and mitigation measures are not required.
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14 Page 40
MND PART 2
Initial Study 2014-0006
4-lot Planned Development #7
10380 El Camino Real PLN 2014-1499
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
3.b.) Construction activities, including site grading, have the potential to produce small quantities of air pollution that
include dust and equipment exhaust. Air quality impacts from construction will be temporary and short term. The
project shall be conditioned to comply with all applicable APCD regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust
(PM-10) as showed in Section 2 “Assessing and Mitigating Construction Impacts” of the April 2012 CEQA Air Quality
Handbook.
3.d.e) The construction of the proposed project will not concentrate pollutants or create objectionable odors.
Mitigation Measure 3.b.1: The project shall be conditioned to comply with all applicable District regulations pertaining
to the control of fugitive dust (PM-10) as contained in Section 2 “Assessing and Mitigating Construction Impacts.”
2.3.1 Standard Mitigation Measures for Construction Equipment
Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to manufacture r’s specifications;
Fuel all off-road and portable diesel power equipment with ARB certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (non-taxed
version suitable for use off-road);
Use diesel construction equipment meeting ARB’s Tier 2 certified engines or cleaner off -road heavy duty
diesel engines, and comply with State off -Road Regulations;
Use on-road heavy duty trucks that meet ARB’s 2007 or cleaner certification standard for on -road heavy duty
diesel engines, and comply with State On-Road Regulation;
Construction or trucking companies with fleets that do not have engines in their fleet that meet the engin e
standards identified in the above two measures (e.g. captive or NOx exempt area fleets) may be eligible by
proving alternative compliance;
All on and off-road diesel equipment shall not idle for more than 5 minutes. Signs shall be posted in the
designated queuing areas and or job sites to remind drivers and operators of the 5 minute idling limit;
Diesel idling within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors is not permitted;
Staging and queuing areas shall not be located within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors;
Electrify equipment when feasible;
Substitute gasoline-powered in place of diesel-powered equipment, where feasible; and
Use alternatively fueled construction equipment on- site where feasible, such as compressed natural gas
(CNG), liquefied natural gas (LNG), propone or biodiesel.
2.4 Fugitive Dust Mitigation Measures: Expanded List
N. Reduce the amount of the disturbed areas where possible;
O. Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the sit e.
Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non -
potable) water should be used whenever possible;
P. All dirt stock pile areas should be sprayed daily as needed;
Q. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project revegtaion and landscape plans should
be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities;
R. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial gradin g
should be sown with a fast germinating, non -invasive grass seed and water until vegetation is established;
S. All disturbed soil area not subject to revegetation should be stabilized using approved chemical soil binder,
jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the APCD;
T. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. to be paved should be completed as soon as possible. In addition,
building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used;
U. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the
construction site;
V. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two
feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC
Section 23114;
W. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or wash off trucks and
equipment leaving the site;
X. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visib le soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water
sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where feasible;
Y. All of these fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be shown on grading and building plans;
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14 Page 41
MND PART 2
Initial Study 2014-0006
4-lot Planned Development #7
10380 El Camino Real PLN 2014-1499
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Z. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or person to monitor the fugitive dust emissions and
enhance the implementation of the measures as necessary to minimize dust complains, reduce visible
emission below 20% opacity, and to prevent transport of dust offsite. Their duties shall inclu de holidays and
weekend periods when work may not be in progress. The name and telephone number of such persons shall
be provided to the APCD Compliance Division prior to the start of any grading, earthwork or demolition.
Mitigation Measure 3.b.2: The project shall be conditioned to comply with all applicable APCD regulations pertaining to
Naturally Occurring Asbestos (NOA). Prior to any grading activities a geologic evaluation should be conducted to
determine if NOA is present within the area that will be disturbed. If NOA is not present, and exemptions request must
be filed with the District. If NOA is found at the site, the applicant must comply with all requirements outlined in the
Asbestos ATCM. This may include development of an Asbestos Dust Mitigat ion Plan and an Asbestos Health and
Safety program for approval by the APCD. Technical Appendix 4.4 of the SLO County APCD CEQA Air Quality
Handbook includes a map of zones throughout San Luis Obispo County where NOA has been found and geological
evaluation is required prior to any grading.
Mitigation Measure 3.b.3: The project shall be conditioned to comply with all applicable APCD regulations pertaining to
demolition. Demolition activities can have potential negative air quality impacts, including issue s surrounding proper
handling, demolition, and disposal of asbestos containing material (ACM). Asbestos containing materials
could be encountered during demolition of existing buildings or can also be found in utility pipes/pipelines (transite
pipes or insulation on pipes). If utility pipelines are scheduled for removal or relocation or a building(s) is proposed to
be removed or renovated, various regulatory requirements may apply, including the requirements stipulated in the
National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (40CFR61, Subpart M - asbestos NESHAP). These
requirements include but are not limited to: 1) notification to the APCD, 2) an asbestos survey conducted by a Certified
Asbestos Inspector, and, 3) applicable removal and disposal requirements of identified ACM.
Mitigation Measure 3.b.4: Developmental burning of vegetative material is prohibited within San Luis Obispo County.
There shall be no developmental burning of vegetation on site.
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife
Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal,
etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption,
or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14 Page 42
MND PART 2
Initial Study 2014-0006
4-lot Planned Development #7
10380 El Camino Real PLN 2014-1499
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan,
or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
SOURCES: Atascadero Native Tree Regulations; General Plan 2025; Site Plan, Site Visit, National Wetland Inventory;
Biological Report/Wetland Assessment by Terra Verde Environmental Consulting (May 2, 2014); Arborist e valuation for
tree removals, Henry Curtis Certified Arborist WE-6345A.
DISCUSSION:
4.a.b.c To the west of the project site, along the rear property, there is an existing City maintained drainage feature
known as “Perkins Ditch” located within an easement in favor of the City. The drainage feature collects water from the
surrounding developed multifamily zoned neighborhood during storm events, and is regularly maintained by the City
according to the City’s annual swale maintenance permit with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW .)
A biological report / wetland assessment was completed by Terra Verde Environmental Consulting on May 2, 2014, in
order to assess the drainage feature and determine jurisdictional analysis and recommendations to avoid and/or
minimize potential project related impacts. The biological report (see Attachment 7) states that the habitat within the
drainage feature is characterized as freshwater wetland dominated by cattail (Typha sp.), a wetland obligate. The
Corps 2013 Regional Wetland Plant List for the Arid West Region was consulted to determine the wetland indicator
status of all species identified. Water was present within the drainage at the time of the survey at a depth of
approximately one foot or less. Wildlife observed during the survey was limited to a pair of mallard (Anas
platyrhynchos) and Sierran treefrog (Pseudacris sierra) tadpoles. The lower portion of the drainage feature to the
downstream culvert at San Rafael Court and El Camino Real was also inspected as part of the survey confirming
connectivity to an unnamed blue line stream and tributary to the Salinas River (refer Attachment D of Biological report‐
Representative Site Photographs). In summary, the drainage feature was determined to be CDFW jurisdiction per
Section 1600 of the Fish and Game Code and likely jurisdiction of the Corps and RWQCB per the CWA due to periodic
connectivity via surface flows to the traditionally navigable waters of the Salinas River and ultimately the Pacific Ocean.
All development and associated storm water conveyance structures proposed with the project at 10380 El Camino
Real are proposed to be built upland of the drainage feature, beyond the top of bank, and outside the limits of the
jurisdictional area. An 11-foot setback is maintained between the proposed development and the centerline of the
wetland drainage feature. There shall be no removal of vegetation surrounding the wetland or drainage feature during
construction of the proposed project. Although no direct impacts to the drainage are expected, the following avoidance
and minimization measures are included to ensure protection of the subject drainage feature during the construction
phase.
4.d. The site is located within the City’s urban core, and is s urrounded by medium density multifamily zone and small
lot single family housing. The Land Use Element EIR concludes that development within the City limits will not have a
significant impact on wildlife or wildlife corridors
4.e An Arborist evaluation has been submitted to address tree impacts associated with the proposed development.
There are three (3) native live oaks trees, ranging in size from 5 -inches DBH to 9-inches DBH, which are proposed for
removal. The trees are located along the southern p roperty line, adjacent to the neighbor’s residence, and are not
associated with the drainage area or wetland to the west of the site. All of the trees removed as part of the project
shall be mitigated according got the Atascadero Native Tree Ordinance.
4.f. The proposed project is not located in an area that will conflict with an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. .
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.1: All construction, structures, permanent fences and grading shall be located beyond the top
of bank of the rear drainage feature known as “Perkins Ditch”. There shall be no removal of vegetation surrounding
the wetland or drainage feature. An 11 foot se tback shall be maintained to the centerline of the drainage ditch
according to the proposed site section drawings (MND Attachment 6.)
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14 Page 43
MND PART 2
Initial Study 2014-0006
4-lot Planned Development #7
10380 El Camino Real PLN 2014-1499
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.2: High‐visibility flagging or fencing shall be installed along the top of the bank to ensure that
the drainage feature is avoided during construction. Signage will be also installed in association with the
flagging/fencing designating the drainage feature as an environmentally sensitive area. All construction activities and
personnel shall remain outside of the flagged/fenced area, and flagging/fencing shall be maintained for the duration of
construction.
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.3: No refueling or maintenance of vehicles or equipment shall occur within 100 feet of the
drainage feature.
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.4: Spill clean‐up kits and secondary containment shall be made available and used to
prevent spills or leaks from entering the drainage.
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.5: Appropriate Best Management Practices (e.g., silt fencing, straw wattles, etc.) shall be
installed, as necessary, to avoid and/or minimize silt and sedimentation impacts to the drainage feature.
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.6: Any graded areas shall be stabilized with erosion control hydroseed consisting of native
species matching the existing plant species within the tributary stream. The seed and plant material shall not contain
any introduced plant species. See biological report for identified plant species.
Mitigation Measure 4.e.1: All tree removals shall be mitigated according to the Atascadero Nativ e Tree Ordinance.
Mitigation shall include either replanting on site, or payment of mitigation fees to the Native Tree fund.
Mitigation Measure 4.e.2: Grading and excavation and grading work shall be consistent with the City of Atascadero
Tree Ordinance. Special precautions when working around native trees include:
7. All existing trees outside of the limits of work shall remain.
8. Earthwork shall not exceed the limits of the project area.
9. Low branches in danger of being torn from trees shall be pruned pri or to any heavy equipment work being
done.
10. Vehicles and stockpiled material shall be stored outside the drip line of all trees.
11. All trees within the area of work shall be fenced for protection with 4 -foot chain link, snow or safety fencing
placed per the approved tree protection plan. Tree protection fencing shall be in place prior to any site
excavation or grading. Fencing shall remain in place until completion of all construction activities.
12. Any roots that are encountered during excavation shall be clea n cut by hand and sealed with an approved
tree seal.
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
a historical resource as defined in '15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
an archaeological resource pursuant to '15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
SOURCES: Project description; Site Plan, CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060 to 15065, Atascadero City GIS Data, Site
Visit
DISCUSSION:
5.a. There are no known historic resources loca ted on or adjacent to the site based on GIS data collected by the City
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14 Page 44
MND PART 2
Initial Study 2014-0006
4-lot Planned Development #7
10380 El Camino Real PLN 2014-1499
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
of Atascadero.
5.b. There are no known archaeological resources located on o r adjacent to the project site based on City GIS data
that identifies area of archaeological significance.
5. c. Paleontological resources or unique geologic features are not known to be located on the project site based on
City GIS data.
5. d. No known human remains have been found or documented in the vicinity of the project.
Mitigation 5.b.1: In the event that archaeological resources are discovered on the property, all work on the project
shall stop. When a project will impact an archeological site, the Atascadero Community Development Department shall
first determine whether the site is a historical resource. If a lead agency determines that the archaeological site is an
historical resource, it shall refer to the Public Resources Code Sections for guidance. If an archaeologica l resource is
neither a unique archaeological nor an historical resource, the effects of the project on those resources shall not be
considered a significant effect on the environment.
Mitigation 5.d.1: In the event that human remains are discovered on the property, all work on the project shall stop and
the Atascadero Police Department and the County Coroner shall be contacted. The Atascadero Community
Development Department shall be notified. If the human remains are identified as being Native Ameri can, the
California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be contacted at (916) 373-3710 within 24 hours. A
representative from listed tribes shall be notified and present during the excavation of any remains.
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated
on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area
or based on other substantial evidence of a known
fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or
that would become unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B
of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial
risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of
septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the disposal of
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14 Page 45
MND PART 2
Initial Study 2014-0006
4-lot Planned Development #7
10380 El Camino Real PLN 2014-1499
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
wastewater?
SOURCES: Project description; Site Plan, City of Atascadero GIS Data
DISCUSSION:
6.a. The City of Atascadero GIS Data shows that the project is not located on any known earthquake faults , and the
property contains no unusual geological formations. Refer to Attachment 7.
6.b. Construction activities on the site will be required to comply with sedimentation and erosion control measures
prescribed by the Project Engineer and consistent wit h state regulations.
6.c.d.e. Soil conditions will be reviewed during building permit review in accordance in accordance with the municipal
code. Soils report is required for submittal with a future building permit by the development. The building plans will be
required to following the recommendations of the soil report to assure safety of the buildings.
Mitigation Measure 6.b.1: Any grading permit application plans shall include erosion control measures to prevent soil,
dirt, and debris from entering the storm drain system during and after construction. A separate plan shall be submitted
for this purpose and shall be subject to review and approval by City Staff at the time of Building Permit application.
Mitigation Measure 6.b.2: All cut and fill slopes shall be hydro seeded with an appropriate erosion control method
(erosion control blanket, hydro-mulch, or straw mulch appropriately anchored) immediatel y after completion of
earthwork. All disturbed slopes shall have appropriate erosion control metho ds in place. Duration of the project: The
contractor will be responsible for the clean-up of any mud or debris that is tracked onto public streets by construction
vehicles.
Mitigation Measure 6.c.d.1: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant will submit a soils report to Building
Department. The building plans will be required to follow the recommendations of the soils report to assure safety for
residents and buildings. The soils report will ensure that the proposed project site and bu ilding location will not be
subject to geological events.
7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS -- Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or
indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
b) Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of
an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the
emissions of greenhouse gases?
SOURCES: Project description, Site Plan, San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (APCD) CEQA Air
Quality Handbook, 2012; Atascadero 2014 Climate Action Plan, General Plan 2025, 2004
DISCUSSION:
7.a.b. The proposed project consists of four (4) new residential units located on a previously graded, relatively flat
development site totaling less than one-half acre in size. According to the Operational Screening Criteria for Project
Air Quality Analysis (SLOAPCD, 2012), a single-family housing development of this size is not expected to exceed the
APCD Annual GHG Bright Line Threshold (3) of 1150 MT CO2e/year from Operational & Amortized Construction
Impacts. The Bright-Line numeric threshold of 1,150 MT CO2e/yr. represents an emissions level below which
a project’s contribution to global climate change would be deemed less than “cumulatively considerable.” This
threshold is equivalent to a project size of approximately 70 single -family dwelling units. Therefore, greenhouse gas
emissions resulting from the project’s 4 new residential units are considered to be less than significant and mitigation
measures are not required.
The proposed new residences are consistent with City and regional plans, policies, and regulations, regarding
reduction of emissions of greenhouse ga ses. The General Plan anticipates 4 residences to be constructed on the
subject parcel. The site is currently underutilized vacant land within the medium density multifamily area. The subject
site is proposed as infill development of a vacant site within the City’s urban service boundary. The site is in close
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14 Page 46
MND PART 2
Initial Study 2014-0006
4-lot Planned Development #7
10380 El Camino Real PLN 2014-1499
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
proximity to surrounding commercial, services, and transit. The proposed project is consistent with the goals and GHG
reduction measures identified in the Atascadero 2014 Climate Action Plan.
8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -- Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal
of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-
quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government
Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan area
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people living or working
in the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstr ip, would
the project result in a safety hazard for people living or
working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
SOURCES: Project description; General Plan Land Use Element, Department of Toxic Substances Control:
EnviroStor. GIS
DISCUSSION
8a.b.c. The proposed residential development does not generate or involve use of significant amounts of hazardous
materials. There are no known hazardous materials on the site or nearby according to Department of Toxic
Substances Control: EnviroStor. See Attachment.
8.d. The property is not a listed hazardous material site based on the EnviroStor map.
8e.f. The property is not near an airport. See Attachment.
8g.h. Although GIS determines the site has a high fire severity level, the site is within the Fire Department’s five minute
or less response area. During building permit review, the fire department will verify appropriate fire hydrant locations
and will determine if the new buildings or building additions will require fi re sprinklers.
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14 Page 47
MND PART 2
Initial Study 2014-0006
4-lot Planned Development #7
10380 El Camino Real PLN 2014-1499
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -- Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the
local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of
previously-existing nearby wells would drop to a level that
would not support existing land uses or planned uses for
which permits have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, in a manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount
of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding
on- or off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems
or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that
would impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a
result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
SOURCES: Project description, GIS, FEMA Flood Map, Site Plan, Resolution No. R3-2013-0032 Central Coast Water
Control Board, California Department of Conservation
DISCUSSION:
9a. .The construction of the proposed four residences will not violate water quality standards.
9b. The project will not deplete ground water supplies. Water will be provided by Atascadero Mutual Water Company.
9c.d.f. Construction activities are subject to review for compliance with City drainage and grading regulations.
Drainage will not be permitted to create or intensify any hazards for persons or property in the vicinity.
9e. The Central Coast Water Control Board requires reducing pollutant discharges to the Maximum Extent Practicable
and preventing storm water discharges from causing or contributing to a violation of receiving water quality standards
in all applicable development projects that require approvals and/or permits issued under the Permittee’s planning,
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14 Page 48
MND PART 2
Initial Study 2014-0006
4-lot Planned Development #7
10380 El Camino Real PLN 2014-1499
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
building, or other comparable authority.
9.g.h.i. The proposed residence will be outside of the 100-year flood hazard area. Refer to Attachment.
9.j. The project area is not subject to inundation by a tsunami , according to the California Department of
Conservation. See Attachment.
Mitigation Measure 9.e.f.1: The developer is responsible for ensuring that all contractors are aware of all storm water
quality measures and that such measures are implemented. Failure to comply with the approv ed construction Best
Management Practices will result in the issuance of correction notices, citations, or stop orders.
Mitigation Measure 9.e.f.2:
i) Limit disturbance of creeks and natural drainage feature s.
ii) Minimize compaction of highly permeable soils.
iii) Limit clearing and grading of native vegetation at the site to the minimum area needed to build the project,
allow access, and provide fire protection.
iv) Minimize impervious surfaces by concentrating improvements on the least -sensitive portions of the site, while
leaving the remaining land in a natural undisturbed state
v) Minimize storm water runoff by implementing one of more of the following site design measures:
(1) Direct roof runoff into cisterns or rain barrels for reuse.
(2) Direct roof runoff onto vegetated areas safely away from building foundations and footings,
consistent with California Building code.
(3) Direct runoff from sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios , driveways, and/or uncovered parking lots onto
vegetated areas safely away from building foundations and footings, consistent with California
building code.
(4) Construct driveways uncovered parking lots, walkways, and patios with permeable surfaces. (Central
Coast Water Control Board, 2013)
10. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan,
local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or
natural community conservation plan?
SOURCES: Land Use Element; project description; Lot Line Adjustment Map, Atascadero Municipal Code
DISCUSSION:
10.a. The project will not physically divide an established community. The subject site is infill, vacant multifamily.
10.b. The General Plan identifies the proposed homes as a compatible use in the RMF-10 Zone. The proposed use is
also consistent with City ordinances that perm it the construction and use of a Planned Development #7 Single Family
Residential units. The site’s zoning and use is consistent with the General Plan.
10.c. The project is consistent with the open space and conse rvation policies identified in the General Plan.
Mitigation Measure: No applicable mitigation measures
11. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and the
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14 Page 49
MND PART 2
Initial Study 2014-0006
4-lot Planned Development #7
10380 El Camino Real PLN 2014-1499
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general
plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
SOURCES: Project description; Planning staff site visit.
DISCUSSION:
11.a.b. No mining is proposed as a part of this project. No known mineral reso urces have been identified in the area.
Mitigation Measure: No applicable mitigation measures
12. NOISE -- Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in
excess of standards established in the local general plan or
noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
ground-borne vibration or ground-borne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of
a public airport or public use airport, would the project
expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would
the project expose people living or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
SOURCES: Project description; Noise Element; Noise Ordinance; Acoustical Design Manual.
DISCUSSION:
12a.b.c.d. Construction is expected to involve some construction equipment and use of impact tools that make noise.
Noise levels on the site are thus expected to be raised temporarily. The future home is not expected to generate
unacceptable levels of noise. Any electrical or mechanical equipment used for construction of the proposed project is
required to comply with the Atascadero Noise Ordinance, Chapter 14 in the Atascadero Municipal Code. Any
permanent change in ambient noise levels that might be created by equipment or equipment shelter mechanical
features will be required to be designed to be consiste nt with the Noise Ordinance.
12.e.f.) The project is not located within an airport land use plan or private airstrip. Refer to Attachment 9.
Mitigation Measure 12.d.1: All construction activities shall comply with the City of Atascadero Noise Ordinance for
hours of operation.
13. POPULATION AND HOUSING -- Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14 Page 50
MND PART 2
Initial Study 2014-0006
4-lot Planned Development #7
10380 El Camino Real PLN 2014-1499
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
SOURCES: Project description; General Plan Land Use Element , FEIR.
DISCUSSION:
13.a.) Four new homes will be built where the general plan anticipates additional housing. Additional housing units
identified by the general plan have been studies by the FEIR, thus making this a less than significant impact.
13.b.c.) No housing or persons will be displaced.
Mitigation Measure: No applicable mitigation measures
14. PUBLIC SERVICES -- Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with
the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public
services:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
SOURCES: Project description; Land Use Element EIR.
DISCUSSION:
Development Impact Fees: Development Impact Fees will be required of any new project for which a building permit is
issued. The concept of the impact fee program is to fund and sustain improvements which are needed as a result of
new development as stated in the General Plan and other policy documents within the fee program. Development
Impact Fees fall into the following categories: Drainage Fees; Streets, Road, Bridge Fees; Sewer Fees; Public Safety
Fees; and Park Fees, Miscellaneous Fees. In addition, school fees are collected by the Atascadero Unified School
District. The amount of impact fees to be paid will be determined at the time of issuance of building permit.
Fire and Police: Impact fees are charged for new development, to help pay the cost of providing new facilities to serve
the expanding city. The Fire Department of the City of Atascadero has indicated that it will be able to adequately
service the proposed project. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Fire Department. The City of
Atascadero Police Department has also indicated that the proposed project poses no problems to the police to
adequately service it.
Schools: At build out of the General Plan, the city’s population will overburden the existing school system unless
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14 Page 51
MND PART 2
Initial Study 2014-0006
4-lot Planned Development #7
10380 El Camino Real PLN 2014-1499
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
additional classroom space is added. The Atascadero Unified School District charges impact fees to fund additional
schools as needed. State law restricts mitigation of school impacts to the levying of these fees and other measures
adopted by the school district. Provision of adequate facilities for th e population is the responsibility of the school
district. Development impact will be assessed by the school district, and collected at the time of building permit
issuance for each residential unit.
Parks: Project Description (new residences) will / will not increase demand on existing City parks and recreation
facilities. The City’s Parks & Recreation Commission is committed to finding ways to continue to provide parks and
other recreational opportunities to city residents as the city expands, thereby addressing cumulative impacts.
Other public facilities: The construction of the project is not expected to have significant impacts on any other public
facilities.
Mitigation Measure: No applicable mitigation measures
15. RECREATION --
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require
the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that
might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
SOURCES: Project description; Parks and Recreation Element.
DISCUSSION:
15.a. Residents are expected to use existing parks and recreational facilities, but the numbers are not expected to
result in substantial physical deterioration of any facilities. Development impact fees will be collected to bring this
impact to less than significant levels.
15.b. The project does not involve construction of recreational facilities.
Mitigation Measure: No applicable mitigation measures
16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -- Would the project:
a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy
establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance
of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of
transportation including mass transit and non-motorized
travel and relevant components of the circulation system,
including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways
and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass
transit?
b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management
program, including, but not limited to level of service
standards and travel demand measures, or other standards
established by the county congestion manageme nt agency
for designated roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14 Page 52
MND PART 2
Initial Study 2014-0006
4-lot Planned Development #7
10380 El Camino Real PLN 2014-1499
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
results in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or
otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such
facilities?
SOURCES: Land Use Element; Circulation Element; Project Description; ITE Trip Generation Rates (8th edition),
Atascadero Fire Department, City of Atascadero Engineering Standards
DISCUSSION:
16a.b. The Circulation Element in the Atascadero General Plan identifies policies and programs to address cumulative
trips in Atascadero. The projected amount of generated trips for the project is 10 (ten). The project is consistent with
polices and mitigations discussed in the Circulation Element.
16.c. No changes will occur to air traffic patterns.
16.d. The proposed project will not substantially increase hazards due to a design feature.
16.e. The proposed project will have adequate emergency through appropriate mitigations. GIS data shows that
although the project site has a high fire risk, the site has a less than 5 minutes fire response.
16.f. The proposed project will not affect th e circulation in the area. The home will have no significant impact of the
performance of circulation in the area.
Mitigation Measure 16. e.1: The proposed home shall be compliant with Atascadero Fire Department Standards
including the appropriate slope of driveway, materials used to construct the driveway (paved), and a required fire
turnaround on site. (Atascadero Fire Department)
17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS --Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new
or expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider that serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand
in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14 Page 53
MND PART 2
Initial Study 2014-0006
4-lot Planned Development #7
10380 El Camino Real PLN 2014-1499
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
SOURCES: Project description; Land Use Element; Hydrology and Water Quality Element
DISCUSSION:
Water: The Atascadero Mutual Water Company (AMWC) will provide water. All property within the City limits is
entitled to water from the AMWC. The project is not expected to require a significant quantity of water for the proposed
use.
Water is pumped from several portions of the largest underground basin in the county, the Paso Robles Formation,
using a series of shallow and deep wells. The water company anticipates that it will be able to meet the city’s needs
through build out and beyond:
Water demand at build out is estimated to be at 16,000-20,000 acre-feet per year (AFY). The City is projected to have
enough water to meet the demand with the approval of the Nacimiento Water Project which has allocated the City an
additional 3,000 AFY with a flow rate of 3.48 million gallons per day (mgd).
Sewer: The project will be served by on-site septic. Sewer discharge will be handled by an on City sewer connection.
The Hydrology and Water Quality Element confirms that the average daily flow of the projected housing need (RHNA)
is well within the capacity of the upgraded wastewater treatment system as part of the General Plan Housing Element.
Storm Water. On-site storm water drainage will be managed by the construction of a earth swale, installation of 1 CY
rock rip rap slope protection over erosion control fabric, as well as tracking straw into newly graded slopes or hydro
seed with erosion control native seed mix.
18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE --
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history
or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with the
effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects,
and the effects of probable future projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental effects that will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
d) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term
environmental goals to the disadvantage of long term
environmental goals?
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
07/18/14 Page 54
MND PART 2
DISCUSSION: The project site is an undeveloped residential site which is currently being proposed for four (4)
single-family residences through a Planned Development #7, consistent with the General Plan and Zoning
Ordinance provisions. The proposed project has been analyzed as required by CEQA and the Atascadero Municipal
Code. Project-related impacts have been identified and mitigation measures have been included within the proposal
to reduce the effect of the proposed project as described herein.
SOURCES:
General Plan 2025, City of Atascadero, 2004
California Department of Conservation
Zoning Ordinance, part of Municipal Code, City of Atascadero, as amended through March 2012.
CEQA Air Quality Handbook, Air Pollution Control District San Luis Obispo County, Ap ril 2012
Acoustical Design Manual, Brown-Buntin Associates, 1991
Flood Insurance Map FEMA Flood Map 08-09-1704V-060700,
Site Plan Resolution No. R3-2013-0032 Central coast Water Control Board
CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15060 to 15065
City of Atascadero, GIS Data
Atascadero Fire Department
City of Atascadero Engineering Standards
California Department of Toxic Substances Control: Envirostor
ITE Trip Generation Rates (8th edition)
Atascadero Climate Action Plan 2014
PROJECT SOURCES:
Project Description
Site Survey, Vesting tentative Map #AT 14-0028
Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Grading Plan
Elevations, Floor Plans, Site Sections
Biological Report/Wetland Assessment by Terra Verde Environmental Consulting (May 2, 2014)
Arborist evaluation for tree removals, Henry Curtis Certified Arborist WE-6345A.
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 3
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT 4: Draft Resolution A
PD-7 – ZCH 2014-0173, CUP 2014-0282, TPM 2014-0101
Approval of Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration
DRAFT RESOLUTION A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING
PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2014-0006
PREPARED FOR ZONE CHANGE ZONE CHANGE 2014-0173,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2014-0282, AND TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP 2014-0101,
ON APN 056-383-021
(10380 El Camino Real / Michaud)
WHEREAS, an application has been received from Leo Michaud (8090 Cristobal Ave.
Atascadero, CA 93422), Applicant and Property Owner, to consider a project consisting of a
Zone Change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family-10) to RMF-10/PD-7 (Residential Multi-
Family-10 with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of
Development and a four lot Tentative Parcel Map on APN 056-383-021; and,
WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2014-0006
were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing
on August 5, 2014 following the close of the review period to consider the Initial Study and
Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the project will have no
significant impacts with project specific mitigation measures incorporated; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing on
September 9, 2014 following the close of the review period to consider the Initial Study and
Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero hereby resolves to
certify Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2014-0006 based on the following Findings as
shown in Exhibit A:
1. The Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance
with CEQA; and,
2. The Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was presented to the Planning
Commission and City Council, and the information contained therein was
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
considered by the Planning Commission and City Council, prior to recommending
action on the project for which it was prepared; and,
3. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment when
mitigation measures are incorporated into the project.
4. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term
environmental goals.
5. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable.
6. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either
directly or indirectly.
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
On motion by Council Member ______________________, and seconded by Council Member
___________________, the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA
______________________________
Tom O’Malley, Mayor
Attest:
______________________________
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Brian Pierik, City Attorney
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Exhibit A: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2014-0006
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT 5: Draft Ordinance A
PD7 - Zone Change 2014-0173; Approval of Proposed Zoning Map Change
DRAFT ORDINANCE A
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
ZONE CHANGE 2014-0173 AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION OF APN 056-383-021 FROM RMF-10 (RESIDENTIAL
MULTI-FAMILY-10) TO RMF-10 / PD-7 (RESIDENTIAL
MULTI_FAMILY-10 WITH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY #7)
ON APN 056-383-021
(10380 El Camino Real / Michaud)
The City Council hereby finds and declares as follows:
WHEREAS, an application has been received from Leo Michaud (8090 Cristobal Ave.
Atascadero, CA 93422), Applicant and Property Owner, to consider a project consisting of a
Zone Change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family-10) to RMF-10/PD-7 (Residential Multi-
Family-10 with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of
Development and a four lot Tentative Parcel Map on APN 056-383-021; and,
WHEREAS, the site’s General Plan Designation is MDR (Medium-Density Residential);
and,
WHEREAS, the site’s current Zoning District is RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family-10);
and,
WHEREAS, the Atascadero Municipal Code allows for a Planned Development to be
established in the RMF-10 zoning district allowing a maximum of 10 dwelling units per acre;
and,
WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 2014-0006 were
prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of the
City to enact this amendment to the Official Zoning Map to protect the health, safety and welfare
of its citizens by applying orderly development of the City; and,
WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of
environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and,
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone
Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which
hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Zoning amendments;
and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed
Public Hearing held on August 5, 2014 studied and considered Zone Change 2014-0173, after
first studying and considering the Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the
project, and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing
held on September 9, 2014, studied and considered Zone Change 2014-0173, after first studying
and considering the Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project; and,
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findings for Approval of a Zone Change to the Official Zoning Map of
Atascadero Changing the existing site zoning to RMF-10/PD7. The City Council finds as
follows:
1. Modification of development standards or processing requirements is warranted to
promote orderly and harmonious development.
2. Modification of development standards or processing requirements will enhance the
opportunity to best utilize special characteristics of an area and will have a beneficial
effect on the area.
3. Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably achieved through
existing development standards or processing requirements.
4. Proposed plans offer certain redeeming features to compensate for the requested
modification.
SECTION 2. Approval. The City Council of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session
assembled on September 9, 2014, resolved to introduce for first reading by title only, an
ordinance that would rezone the subject site consistent with the following:
1. Exhibit A: Zone Change Map
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
SECTION 3. A summary of this ordinance, approved by the City Attorney, together
with the ayes and noes, shall be published twice: at least five days prior to its final passage in
the Atascadero News, a newspaper published and circulated in the City of Atascadero, and;
before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its final passage in the Atascadero News, a
newspaper published and circulated in the City of Atascadero. A copy of the full text of this
ordinance shall be on file in the City Clerk’s office on and after the date following introduction
and passage and shall be available to any interested member of the public.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on ____________, and PASSED
and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero, State of California, on
____________, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA
______________________________
Tom O’Malley, Mayor
Attest:
______________________________
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Brian Pierik, City Attorney
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Exhibit A: Official Zoning Map Change 2014-0173 (Planned Development Overlay #7)
Existing Designations:
-General Plan: Medium Density Residential
-Zoning District: Residential Multi-Family - 10
Proposed Designations:
-General Plan: Medium Density Residential
-Zoning District: Residential Multi-Family – 10 / Planned Development #7 overlay
Project location:
10380 El Camino Real
Planned Development
#7 overlay
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT 6: Draft Resolution B
PD-7 Master Plan of Development (CUP 2014-0282)
DRAFT RESOLUTION B
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2014-0282 (MASTER PLAN OF
DEVELOPMENT) ON APN 056-383-021
(10380 El Camino Real / Michaud)
WHEREAS, an application has been received from Leo Michaud (8090 Cristobal Ave.
Atascadero, CA 93422), Applicant and Property Owner, to consider a project consisting of a
Zone Change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family-10) to RMF-10/PD-7 (Residential Multi-
Family-10 with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of
Development and a four lot Tentative Parcel Map on APN 056-383-021; and,
WHEREAS, the site’s General Plan Designation is MDR (Medium-Density Residential);
and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended that the site’s Zoning District
be changed from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family-10) to RMF-10 with PD7 (Residential
Multi-Family-10 with a Planned Development Overlay 7); and,
WHEREAS, the PD-7 Overlay District requires a Master Plan of Development to be
approved in the form of a Conditional Use Permit; and,
WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 2014-0006 were
prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and,
WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of
environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and,
WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Conditional
Use Permit application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which
hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Master Plan of
Development; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed
Public Hearing held on August 5, 2014, studied and considered the Conditional Use Permit
2014-0282 (Master Plan of Development), after first studying and considering the Proposed
Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project, and,
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing
held on September 9, 2014, studied and considered Conditional Use Permit 2014-0282 (Master
Plan of Development), after first studying and considering the Proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration prepared for the project, and
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council takes the following actions:
SECTION 1. Findings for Approval of Conditional Use Permit. The City Council of
the City of Atascadero finds as follows:
1. The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan and the City’s
Appearance Review Manual; and,
2. The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Title (Zoning
Ordinance) including the PD-7 Ordinance; and,
3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because
of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to
the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in
the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity of the use; and,
4. That the proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the character or the
immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development; and,
5. That the proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe
capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be improved
in conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the
surrounding neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance
with the Land Use Element; and,
6. The Master Plan of Development standards or processing requirements will enhance
the opportunity to best utilize special characteristics of an area and will have a
beneficial effect on the area; and
7. Benefits derived from the Master Plan of Development and PD overlay zone cannot
be reasonably achieved through existing development standards or processing
requirements.
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
SECTION 2. Findings for Approval of Tree Removal. The City Council finds as
follows:
1. The trees are obstructing proposed improvements that cannot be reasonably designed
to avoid the need for tree removal, as certified by a report from the Site Planner and
determined by the Community Development Department based on the following
factors:
Early consultation with the City;
Consideration of practical design alternatives;
Provision of cost comparisons (from applicant) for practical design alternatives;
If saving tree eliminates all reasonable uses of the property; or
If saving the tree requires the removal of more desirable trees.
SECTION 3. Approval. The City Council of the City of Atascadero, in a regular
session assembled on September 9, 2014, resolved to approve Conditional Use Permit 2014-0282
(Master Plan of Development) subject to the following:
1. EXHIBIT A: Conditions of Approval / Mitigation Monitoring Program
2. EXHIBIT B: Master Plan of Development (Site Plan)
3. EXHIBIT C: Statistical Project Summary
4. EXHIBIT D: Landscape Plan
5. EXHIBIT E: Grading and Drainage Plan
6. EXHIBIT F: Floor Plans, Elevations
7. EXHIBIT G: Site Sections
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
On motion by Council Member ____________________, and seconded by Council
Member__________________, the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA
By:_____________________________
Tom O’Malley, Mayor
Attest:
_____________________________________
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________________
Brian Pierik, City Attorney
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
EXHIBIT A: Conditions of Approval / Mitigation Monitoring Program
PD-7 Master Plan of Development (CUP 2004-0138) ZCH 2004-0090
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
PD-7 Master Plan of Development
CUP 2014-0282 / ZCH 2014-0173
Timing
BL: Business License
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
FI: Final Inspection
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
Mitigation
Measure
Planning Services
1. The approval of this zone change and use permit shall become final
and effective following City Council approval.
BP PS
2. Approval of this Master Plan of Development shall be valid
concurrently with the life of Tentative Parcel Map 2014-0101 and then
indefinitely following Final Map. The Master Plan of Development
approval shall expire and become null and void unless a Final Map is
recorded consistent with the Master Plan of Development.
FM PS
3. Subsequent changes to the Master Plan of Development shall be
approved by the Planning Commission, independent of Council
action.
On-going PS
4. The Community Development Department shall have the authority to
approve the following minor changes to the project the (1) modify the
site plan project by less than 10%, (2) result in a superior site design
or appearance, and/or (3) address a construction design issue that is
not substantive to the Master Plan of Development. The Planning
Commission shall have the final authority to approve any other
changes to the Master Plan of Development and any associated
Tentative Maps.
BP / FM PS
5. All subsequent Maps and construction permits shall be consistent with
the Master Plan of Development contained herein.
BP / FM PS
6. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Atascadero or its agents, officers, and employees against any claim
or action brought to challenge an approval by the city, or any of its
entities, concerning the project.
BP / FM PS
7. All exterior elevations, finish materials and colors shall be consistent
with the Master Plan of Development as shown in EXHIBITS F and G
to include the following, subject to staff approval:
The applicant shall submit a new color board which reflects a
historical color palette with earth-toned colors and deep accents,
consistent with the selected architectural style, subject to final
staff approval. Four (4) distinct color schemes shall be provided,
one for each unit. A two toned paint scheme shall be utilized for
the walls, with a third trim color utilized on the building and
window trim.
All garage doors shall be recessed and not be flush with the
exterior.
BP PS
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
PD-7 Master Plan of Development
CUP 2014-0282 / ZCH 2014-0173
Timing
BL: Business License
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
FI: Final Inspection
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
Mitigation
Measure
All garage doors shall be of architectural grade and high durable
quality and painted to match or compliment the final approved
building colors. Garage doors may either be purchased from the
factory in a color approved by staff, or may be purchased in a
primer finish to be painted in a color approved by staff. Garage
door specifications to be identified on plans prior to building
permit issuance
8. All site development shall be consistent with the maximum intensities
described in the statistical project summary as shown in EXHIBIT B
AND C.
BP/FM PS
9. All site work, grading, and site improvements shall be consistent with
the Master Plan of Development as shown in EXHIBITS B through G
with the following minor site modification:
The landscape plan shall be modified to reflect high quality
landscape, as required by the Planned Development overlay.
A landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a
landscape professional and shall be consistent with the Water
Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Plant palettes shall include a
mixture of drought tolerant trees, shrubs, and ground cover
plants. Plant spacing and density shall be adequate to provide
complete coverage in all front yards and visible side yards,
based on the size and species of plants specified.
Street trees shall be planted along El Camino Real and along
the interior private driveway, spaced at 30-foot on center
minimum. Street trees installed on El Camino Real shall be
specified as 24-inch box sized London Planes, and planted per
Public Works specifications
BP/FM PS
10. All project fencing shall be installed consistent with EXHIBIT B, D & G
subject to the following modifications:
The design of all fencing shall be of high architectural quality,
durability, and compatible with the selected architectural building
design, subject to staff approval.
6-foot solid wood fences shall be designed to match the
architectural style and shall utilize wood trim pieces along the top
to cap the fence; dog eared fence tops shall not be installed.
Fences shall be stained or clear coated
Fencing along the El Camino Real frontage and in the front
setbacks of any of the units shall be open split rail fencing,
maximum height of 3-feet, as identified on the site plan and site
sections.
A 5-foot high black metal fence shall be installed in the rear yard
BP/FM PS
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
PD-7 Master Plan of Development
CUP 2014-0282 / ZCH 2014-0173
Timing
BL: Business License
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
FI: Final Inspection
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
Mitigation
Measure
of Lot 4 along the westerly property line, adjacent to the drainage
feature.
No fencing shall be installed at the end of the driveway adjacent
to the drainage feature.
Any existing perimeter fencing shall be repaired as required to
perform as fully and aesthetically functional to match new fencing
and project conditions.
11. A final landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted with building
permits and/or site improvement permits.
Landscaping shall be installed in all front yards and visible side
yards by the developer prior to final of each building permit.
All exterior meters, air conditioning units, and mechanical
equipment shall be screened with landscape material.
Trash/recycle container areas shall be screened with fencing or
landscape.
All landscape maintenance shall be the responsibility of the
individual property owner, with the exception of the landscape
along El Camino Real frontage and the drainage swale.
Maintenance of the El Camino Real frontage landscape and
street trees shall be identified in the maintenance agreement.
The property owner of Lot 4 shall coordinate with the City Public
Works Department regarding maintenance of the jurisdictional
wetland/drainage swale at the rear of the project; no work shall
be done in this area without City and Department of Fish and
Wildlife permits.
BP PS
12. Individual trash receptacle bins shall be provided for each unit and
shall be brought to the front of each private driveway weekly for pick
up by Waste Management. Trash, recycling and green waste bins
shall be picked up on the interior shared driveway, and not on El
Camino Real. The fire truck turnaround area shall remain obstructed
to allow for trash truck access and turnaround.
A letter confirming pick up on the private driveway shall be
prepared and signed by the trash pick-up company prior to the
issuance of onsite improvement permits. The property owner
shall provide Waste Management with any driveway access
release agreements as required by Waste Management in
order to provide this service on site.
If for any reason the waste management company is unable to
provide individual bin pick on the private driveway, then a
shared dumpster shall be constructed and utilized by the four
units. The dumpsters shall be located at the back of the fire
truck turnaround. A solid masonry enclosure shall be
constructed of split face block or stucco finish, with painted
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
PD-7 Master Plan of Development
CUP 2014-0282 / ZCH 2014-0173
Timing
BL: Business License
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
FI: Final Inspection
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
Mitigation
Measure
solid metal doors. Landscape screening shall be installed
around the trash enclosure. Provisions for trash pick-up shall
be included in the project’s shared maintenance agreement
and easements shall be located to allow access to the trash
enclosure.
Individual trash, recycle and green waste bins shall not be
permitted to be located on El Camino Real for pick up.
13. Affordable Housing Requirement: The applicant shall either
designate one unit as moderate-income unit, deed-restricted for a 30-
year period, or pay an in-lieu fee of 5% of the valuation of the four
market rate units. Deed restriction shall be recorded concurrent with
final map, or in-lieu fees shall be paid at time of building permit
issuance.
FM, BP PS, CE
14. All exterior material finishes (siding, accent materials, lighting, garage
doors) shall be durable, high quality, and consistent with the
architectural appearance of each home.
BP
PS
15. The shared driveway and the fire truck turnaround shall be signed as
“no parking”
BP PS/FD
16. A deed notification shall be recorded on Lot 4 to notify the property
owner of the City easement for maintenance of the drainage feature,
and to notify the property owner of the Department of Fish and Wildlife
jurisdictional boundaries of the wetland area.
FM PS
17. An easement shall be dedicated and recorded on favor of the
adjacent parcel to the south (APN 056-383-022) to allow shared
access of the interior driveway along the property line of the subject
parcel at APN 056-383-021. If the adjacent property develops in the
future, it shall be permitted to utilize the 20-foot driveway on the
subject parcel for shared access.
FM PS
18. Specifications and location for the mailboxes shall be identified with
building permits and on/off site improvement permits for review and
approval by City staff and the post office. If located on El Camino
Real frontage, one shared mailbox receptacle shall be permanently
installed, allowing adequate access around the mailbox so not to
block the sidewalk. Mailboxes shall be installed prior to permit final.
BP/FO PS
19. Prior to final map, the applicant shall submit CC&Rs for review and
approval by the City Engineer, City Attorney, and Community
Development Department. The CC&R’s shall record with the Final
Map and shall include the following:
a. Provisions for maintenance of all common areas including
access, fire turn around, street trees, fencing and
landscaping.
BP
PS
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
PD-7 Master Plan of Development
CUP 2014-0282 / ZCH 2014-0173
Timing
BL: Business License
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
FI: Final Inspection
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
Mitigation
Measure
1. The CC&R’s shall state that all exterior colors, exterior
materials, yard fencing, and site landscaping shall be
consistent with the overall master plan of development.
b. A detailed list of each individual homeowner’s
responsibilities for maintenance of the individual units.
c. Individual unit’s responsibility for keeping all trash
receptacles behind fences at rear side yards.
d. A provision for review and approval by the City
Community Development Department for any changes to
the CC&R’s that relate to the above requirements prior to
the changes being recorded or taking effect.
20. The emergency services and facility maintenance costs listed below
shall be 100% funded by the project in perpetuity. The service and
maintenance costs shall be funded through a community facilities
district established by the City at the developer's cost. The funding
mechanism must be in place prior to or concurrently with acceptance
of the final maps. The funding mechanism shall be approved by the
City Attorney, City Engineer and Administrative Services Director prior
to acceptance of any final map. The administration of the above
mentioned funds shall be by the City. Developer agrees to participate
in the community facilities district and to take all steps reasonably
required by the City with regard to the establishment of the district and
assessment of the property.
All Atascadero Police Department service costs to the project.
All Atascadero Fire Department service costs to the project.
Off-site common City of Atascadero park facilities maintenance
service costs related to the project
FM PS
21. All tract maintenance costs listed below shall be 100% funded by the
project in perpetuity. The service and maintenance cost shall be
funded through a maintenance agreement or Home Owners
Association established by the developer subject to City approval.
The maintenance agreement or HOA shall be approved by the City
Attorney, City Engineer and Administrative Services Director, must be
in place prior to, or concurrently with acceptance of any final maps.
The administration of the above mentioned funds, and the
coordination and performance of maintenance activities, shall be the
responsibility of the Home Owners Association, or the individual
property owners as outlined in the maintenance agreement.
All streets, sidewalks, shared driveways, shared and sewer
mains within the project.
All drainage facilities and detention basins.
All common landscaping areas, street trees, parkway planters,
manufactured slopes outside private yards, and other similar
FM PS
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
PD-7 Master Plan of Development
CUP 2014-0282 / ZCH 2014-0173
Timing
BL: Business License
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
FI: Final Inspection
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
Mitigation
Measure
facilities.
All frontage landscaping, street trees and sidewalks along arterial
roads, including the El Camino Real frontage
City Engineer Standard Conditions
1. All public improvements shall be designed and constructed in
conformance with the City of Atascadero Engineering Department
Standard Specifications and Drawings and/or as directed by the City
Engineer.
FM/FO PW
2. In the event that the applicant is allowed to bond for the public
improvements required as a condition of this map, the applicant shall
enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City
Council.
FM PW
3. An engineer’s estimate of probable cost shall be submitted for review
and approval by the City Engineer to determine the amount of the
bond.
FM PW
4. The Subdivision Improvement Agreement shall record concurrently
with the Final Map.
FM PW
5. An encroachment permit shall be obtained prior to the issuance of
building permit.
BP PW
6. A six (6) foot Public Utility Easement (PUE) shall be provided
contiguous to the El Camino Real property frontage.
FM PW
7. The applicant is responsible for the relocation and/or alteration of any
existing utilities that need to be relocated.
BP PW
8. The applicant shall install all new utilities (water, gas, electric, cable
TV and telephone) underground from the point of connection
established by the public utility provider. Utilities shall be extended to
the property line frontage of each lot or its public utility easement.
BP PW
9. The applicant shall monument all property corners for construction
control and shall promptly replace them if disturbed.
FM PW
10. The applicant shall acquire title interest in any off-site land that may
be required to allow for the construction of the public improvements.
The applicant shall bear all costs associated with the necessary
acquisitions. The applicant shall also gain concurrence from all
adjacent property owners whose ingress and egress is affected by
these improvements.
FM PW
11. Slope easements shall be provided, as needed, to accommodate cut
or fill slopes.
FM PW
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
PD-7 Master Plan of Development
CUP 2014-0282 / ZCH 2014-0173
Timing
BL: Business License
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
FI: Final Inspection
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
Mitigation
Measure
12. Drainage easements shall be provided, as needed, to accommodate
both public and private drainage facilities.
FM PW
13. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for review in
conjunction with the processing of the parcel map.
FM PW
14. All existing and proposed utility, pipeline, open space, or other
easements are to be shown on the parcel map. If there are building
or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on
the parcel map. The applicant shall show all access restrictions on
the parcel map.
FM PW
15. The Final Map shall be acceptable to the City Surveyor or City
Engineer prior to the map being placed on the agenda for City Council
acceptance.
FM PW
16. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall submit a map
drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map
and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein. The map shall
be submitted for review and approval by the City in accordance with
the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance.
FM PW
17. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall set monuments
at all new property corners. A registered civil engineer or licensed
land surveyor shall indicate by certificate on the parcel map, that
corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they
will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced.
FM PW
18. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall pay all
outstanding plan check/inspection fees.
FM PW
19. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall complete all
improvements required by these conditions of approval.
FM PW
20. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall have the map
reviewed by all applicable public and private utility companies (cable,
telephone, gas, electric, Atascadero Mutual Water Company). The
applicant shall obtain a letter from each utility company indicating their
review of the map. The letter shall identify any new easements that
may be required by the utility company. A copy of the letter shall be
submitted to the City. New easements shall be shown on the parcel
map
FM PW
21. Prior to the final inspection of any public improvements, the applicant
shall submit as-built drawings and a written statement from a
registered civil engineer that all work has been completed and is in full
compliance with the approved plans.
BP PW
22. Prior to the final inspection, the applicant shall submit a written
certification from a registered civil engineer or land surveyor that all
BP PW
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
PD-7 Master Plan of Development
CUP 2014-0282 / ZCH 2014-0173
Timing
BL: Business License
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
FI: Final Inspection
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
Mitigation
Measure
survey monuments have been set as shown on the Final Map.
City Engineer Project Conditions
22. Driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with City
standards and shall include a 4-foot wide unobstructed pedestrian
sidewalk around the approach. If necessary, applicant shall supply
public pedestrian easement to allow for 4-foot wide unobstructed
pedestrian sidewalk.
FM/BP PW
23. All sewer laterals serving buildings where the finish floor is less than
12-inches above the next upstream manhole shall be fitted with a
backflow prevention device.
FM/BP PW
24. The project plan submittal shall include a detailed hydrology report
addressing storm water run-off for the pre- and post-development
(on-site). The analysis shall be prepared consistent with City and
State standards for storm water detention/retention and treatment
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
FM/BP PW
25. The project shall be designed in compliance with the Cities post-
construction drainage standards and specifications and in
accordance with stormwater regulations/orders adopted by the
State of California (effective March 6, 2014). Projects that propose
2,500 sq. ft. or more of impervious surface area shall prepare a
stormwater analysis demonstrating how the proposed design is
capable of supporting the water management zone criteria and
post-construction performance requirements prior to submittal of
construction documents.
FM/BP PW
26. Stormwater detention/retention as well as water quality shall
conform to the City and State requirements.
FM/BP PW
27. New water facilities and services shall be designed and
constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Atascadero
Mutual Water Company.
FM/BP PW
28. Wastewater discharge shall conform to City requirements and shall
connect to a public sewer main, to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.
FM/BP PW
29. Wastewater fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. FM/BP PW
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure 1.d. 1: All lighting shall be designed to eliminate any
off site glare. All exterior site lights shall utilize full cut-off, “hooded”
lighting fixtures to prevent offsite light spillage and glare. Any luminaire
pole height shall not exceed 12-feet in height, limit intensity to 2.0 foot
candles at ingress /egress. No light shall be permitted to spill off-site.
Fixtures shall be shield cut-off type.
BP BS/PS 1.d.1
Mitigation Measure 3.b.1: The project shall be conditioned to comply with
all applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust
BP BS/PS 3.b.1
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
PD-7 Master Plan of Development
CUP 2014-0282 / ZCH 2014-0173
Timing
BL: Business License
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
FI: Final Inspection
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
Mitigation
Measure
(PM-10) as contained in Section 2 “Assessing and Mitigating Construction
Impacts.”
2.3.1 Standard Mitigation Measures for Construction Equipment
Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to
manufacturer’s specifications;
Fuel all off-road and portable diesel power equipment with ARB
certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (non-taxed version suitable for
use off-road);
Use diesel construction equipment meeting ARB’s Tier 2 certified
engines or cleaner off-road heavy duty diesel engines, and
comply with State off-Road Regulations;
Use on-road heavy duty trucks that meet ARB’s 2007 or cleaner
certification standard for on-road heavy duty diesel engines, and
comply with State On-Road Regulation;
Construction or trucking companies with fleets that do not have
engines in their fleet that meet the engine standards identified in
the above two measures (e.g. captive or NOx exempt area fleets)
may be eligible by proving alternative compliance;
All on and off-road diesel equipment shall not idle for more than
5 minutes. Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing
areas and or job sites to remind drivers and operators of the 5
minute idling limit;
Diesel idling within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors is not
permitted;
Staging and queuing areas shall not be located within 1,000 feet
of sensitive receptors;
Electrify equipment when feasible;
Substitute gasoline-powered in place of diesel-powered
equipment, where feasible; and
Use alternatively fueled construction equipment on- site where
feasible, such as compressed natural gas (CNG), liquefied
natural gas (LNG), propone or biodiesel.
2.4 Fugitive Dust Mitigation Measures: Expanded List
A. Reduce the amount of the disturbed areas where possible;
B. Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to
prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased watering
frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15
mph. Reclaimed (non-potable) water should be used whenever
possible;
C. All dirt stock pile areas should be sprayed daily as needed;
D. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved
project revegetation and landscape plans should be implemented
as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing
activities;
E. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates
greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with
a fast germinating, non-invasive grass seed and water until
vegetation is established;
F. All disturbed soil area not subject to revegetation should be
stabilized using approved chemical soil binder, jute netting, or
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
PD-7 Master Plan of Development
CUP 2014-0282 / ZCH 2014-0173
Timing
BL: Business License
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
FI: Final Inspection
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
Mitigation
Measure
other methods approved in advance by the APCD;
G. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. to be paved should be
completed as soon as possible. In addition, building pads should
be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil
binders are used;
H. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15
mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site;
I. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to
be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard
(minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer)
in accordance with CVC Section 23114;
J. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved
roads onto streets, or wash off trucks and equipment leaving the
site;
K. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is
carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with
reclaimed water should be used where feasible;
L. All of these fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be shown on
grading and building plans;
M. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or person to
monitor the fugitive dust emissions and enhance the
implementation of the measures as necessary to minimize dust
complains, reduce visible emission below 20% opacity, and to
prevent transport of dust offsite. Their duties shall include
holidays and weekend periods when work may not be in
progress. The name and telephone number of such persons
shall be provided to the APCD Compliance Division prior to the
start of any grading, earthwork or demolition.
Mitigation Measure 3.b.2: The project shall be conditioned to comply with
all applicable APCD regulations pertaining to Naturally Occurring
Asbestos (NOA). Prior to any grading activities a geologic evaluation
should be conducted to determine if NOA is present within the area that
will be disturbed. If NOA is not present, and exemptions request must be
filed with the District. If NOA is found at the site, the applicant must
comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM. This may
include development of an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan and an
Asbestos Health and Safety program for approval by the APCD. Tech nical
Appendix 4.4 of the SLO County APCD CEQA Air Quality Handbook
includes a map of zones throughout San Luis Obispo County where NOA
has been found and geological evaluation is required prior to any grading.
BP BS/PS 3.b.2
Mitigation Measure 3.b.3: The project shall be conditioned to comply with
all applicable APCD regulations pertaining to demolition. Demolition
activities can have potential negative air quality impacts, including issues
surrounding proper handling, demolition, and disposal of asbestos
containing material (ACM). Asbestos containing materials
could be encountered during demolition of existing buildings or can also
be found in utility pipes/pipelines (transite pipes or insulation on pipes). If
utility pipelines are scheduled for removal or relocation or a building(s) is
proposed to be removed or renovated, various regulatory requirements
may apply, including the requirements stipulated in the National Emission
Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (40CFR61, Subpart M - asbestos
BP BS/PS 3.b.3
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
PD-7 Master Plan of Development
CUP 2014-0282 / ZCH 2014-0173
Timing
BL: Business License
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
FI: Final Inspection
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
Mitigation
Measure
NESHAP). These requirements include but are not limited to: 1)
notification to the APCD, 2) an asbestos survey conducted by a Certified
Asbestos Inspector, and, 3) applicable removal and disposal requirements
of identified ACM.
Mitigation Measure 3.b.4: Developmental burning of vegetative material is
prohibited within San Luis Obispo County. There shall be no
developmental burning of vegetation on site.
BP BS/PS 3.b.4
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.1: All construction, structures, permanent fences
and grading shall be located beyond the top of bank of the rear drainage
feature known as “Perkins Ditch”. There shall be no removal of
vegetation surrounding the wetland or drainage feature. An 11 foot
setback shall be maintained to the centerline of the drainage ditch
according to the proposed site section drawings (MND Attachment 6.)
BP BS/PS 4.b.c.1
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.2: High‐visibility flagging or fencing shall be
installed along the top of the bank to ensure that the drainage feature is
avoided during construction. Signage will be also installed in association
with the flagging/fencing designating the drainage feature as an
environmentally sensitive area. All construction activities and personnel
shall remain outside of the flagged/fenced area, and flagging/fencing shall
be maintained for the duration of construction.
BP BS/PS 4.b.c.2
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.3: No refueling or maintenance of vehicles or
equipment shall occur within 100 feet of the drainage feature.
BP BS/PS 4.b.c.3
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.4: Spill clean‐up kits and secondary
containment shall be made available and used to prevent spills or leaks
from entering the drainage.
BP BS/PS 4.b.c.4
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.5: Appropriate Best Management Practices
(e.g., silt fencing, straw wattles, etc.) shall be installed, as necessary, to
avoid and/or minimize silt and sedimentation impacts to the drainage
feature.
BP BS/PS 4.b.c.5
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.6: Any graded areas shall be stabilized with
erosion control hydroseed consisting of native species matching the
existing plant species within the tributary stream. The seed and plant
material shall not contain any introduced plant species. See biological
report for identified plant species.
BP BS/PS 4.b.c.6
Mitigation Measure 4.e.1: All tree removals shall be mitigated according to
the Atascadero Native Tree Ordinance. Mitigation shall include either
replanting on site, or payment of mitigation fees to the Native Tree fund.
BP PS 4.e.1
Mitigation Measure 4.e.2: Grading and excavation and grading work shall
be consistent with the City of Atascadero Tree Ordinance. Special
precautions when working around native trees include:
1. All existing trees outside of the limits of work shall remain.
2. Earthwork shall not exceed the limits of the project area.
3. Low branches in danger of being torn from trees shall be pruned
prior to any heavy equipment work being done.
BP PS 4.e.2
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
PD-7 Master Plan of Development
CUP 2014-0282 / ZCH 2014-0173
Timing
BL: Business License
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
FI: Final Inspection
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
Mitigation
Measure
4. Vehicles and stockpiled material shall be stored outside the drip
line of all trees.
5. All trees within the area of work shall be fenced for protectio n
with 4-foot chain link, snow or safety fencing placed per the
approved tree protection plan. Tree protection fencing shall be in
place prior to any site excavation or grading. Fencing shall
remain in place until completion of all construction activities.
6. Any roots that are encountered during excavation shall be clean
cut by hand and sealed with an approved tree seal.
Mitigation 5.b.1: In the event that archaeological resources are
discovered on the property, all work on the project shall stop. When a
project will impact an archeological site, the Atascadero Community
Development Department shall first determine whether the site is a
historical resource. If a lead agency determines that the archaeological
site is an historical resource, it shall refer to the Public Resources Code
Sections for guidance. If an archaeological resource is neither a unique
archaeological nor an historical resource, the effects of the project on
those resources shall not be considered a significant effect on the
environment.
BP/GP PS/BS 5.b.1
Mitigation 5.d.1: In the event that human remains are discovered on the
property, all work on the project shall stop and the Atascadero Police
Department and the County Coroner shall be contacted. The Atascadero
Community Development Department shall be notified. If the human
remains are identified as being Native American, the California Native
American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be contacted at (916) 373-
3710 within 24 hours. A representative from listed tribes shall be notified
and present during the excavation of any remains.
Ongoing PS 5.d.1
Mitigation Measure 6.b.1: Any grading permit application plans shall
include erosion control measures to prevent soil, dirt, and debris from
entering the storm drain system during and after construction. A separate
plan shall be submitted for this purpose and shall be subject to review and
approval by City Staff at the time of Building Permit application.
BP BS/PS 6.b.1
Mitigation Measure 6.b.2: All cut and fill slopes shall be hydro seeded
with an appropriate erosion control method (erosion control blanket,
hydro-mulch, or straw mulch appropriately anchored) immediately after
completion of earthwork. All disturbed slopes shall have appropriate
erosion control methods in place. Duration of the project: The contractor
will be responsible for the clean-up of any mud or debris that is tracked
onto public streets by construction vehicles.
BP BS/PS 6.b.2
Mitigation Measure 6.c.d.1: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the
applicant will submit a soils report to Building Department. The building
plans will be required to follow the recommendations of the soils report to
assure safety for residents and buildings. The soils report will ensure that
the proposed project site and building location will not be subject to
geological events.
BP BS/PS 6.c.d.1
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
PD-7 Master Plan of Development
CUP 2014-0282 / ZCH 2014-0173
Timing
BL: Business License
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
FI: Final Inspection
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
Mitigation
Measure
Mitigation Measure 9.e.f.1: The developer is responsible for ensuring
that all contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that
such measures are implemented. Failure to comply with the approved
construction Best Management Practices will result in the issuance of
correction notices, citations, or stop orders.
BP BS/PS 9.e.f.1
Mitigation Measure 9.e.2.
i) Limit disturbance of creeks and natural drainage feature
ii) Minimize compaction of highly permeable soils
iii) Limit clearing and grading of native vegetation at the site to the
minimum area needed to build the project, allow access, and
provide fire protection.
iv) Minimize impervious surfaces by concentrating improvements on
the least-sensitive portions of the site, while leaving the
remaining land in a natural undisturbed state
v) Minimize storm water runoff by implementing one of more of the
following site design measures:
(1) Direct roof runoff into cisterns or rain barrels for reuse
(2) Direct roof runoff onto vegetated areas safely away
from building foundations and footings, consistent with
California Building code
(3) Direct runoff from sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios,
driveways, and/or uncovered parking lots onto
vegetated areas safely away from building foundations
and footings, consistent with California building code
(4) Construct driveways uncovered parking lots, walkways,
and patios with permeable surfaces. (Central Coast
Water Control Board, 2013)
BP BS/PS 9.e.2.
Mitigation Measure 12.d.1: All construction activities shall comply with the
City of Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours of operation.
BP BS/PS 12.d.1
Mitigation Measure 16. e.1: The proposed home shall be compliant with
Atascadero Fire Department Standards including the appropriate slope of
driveway, materials used to construct the driveway (paved), and a
required fire turnaround on site. (Atascadero Fire Department)
BP BS/PS 16.e.1
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
EXHIBIT B: Master Plan of Development (Site Plan)
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
EXHIBIT C: Statistical Summary of Project
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
EXHIBIT D: Preliminary Landscape Plan
Condition 9: The landscape plan shall be modified to reflect
high quality landscape, as required by the Planned
Development overlay. A landscape and irrigation plan shall be
prepared by a landscape professional and shall be consistent
with the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Plant palettes
shall include a mixture of drought tolerant trees, shrubs, and
ground cover plants. Plant spacing and density shall be
adequate to provide complete coverage in all front yards and
visible side yards, based on the size and species of plants
specified.
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
EXHIBIT E: Grading and Drainage Plan
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
EXHIBIT F: Elevations & Floor Plans
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
EXHIBIT G: Site Sections
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT 7: Draft Resolution C
TPM 2014-0101 Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
DRAFT RESOLUTION C
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2014-0101, A FOUR LOT
SUBDIVISION CONSISTENT WITH A PD-7 MASTER PLAN OF
DEVELOPMENT ON APN 056-383-021
(10380 El Camino Real / Michaud)
WHEREAS, an application has been received from Leo Michaud (8090 Cristobal Ave.
Atascadero, CA 93422), Applicant and Property Owner, to consider a project consisting of a
Zone Change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family-10) to RMF-10/PD-7 (Residential Multi-
Family-10 with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of
Development and a four lot Tentative Parcel Map on APN 056-383-021; and,
WHEREAS, the site’s General Plan Designation is MDR (Medium-Density Residential);
and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended that the site’s Zoning District
be changed from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family-10) to RMF-10 with PD7 (Residential
Multi-Family-10 with a Planned Development Overlay 7); and,
WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 2014-0006 were
prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and,
WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of
environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and,
WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Tentative
Parcel Map application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at
which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said application; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed
Public Hearing held on August 5, 2014, studied and considered the Tentative Parcel Map 2014-
0101, after first studying and considering the Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared
for the project, and,
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing
held on September 9, 2014, studied and considered Tentative Parcel Map 2014-0101, after first
studying and considering the Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project;
and,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero takes the following
actions:
SECTION 1. Findings of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map, the City Council of the
City of Atascadero finds as follows:
1. The proposed subdivision, design and improvements as conditioned, is consistent with
the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements.
2. The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the proposed Planned
Development Overlay District #7 Master Plan of Development (CUP 2014-0282).
3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed.
4. The site is physically suitable for the density of development proposed.
5. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision will not cause substantial
environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish and wildlife or their
habitat.
6. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at
large for access through, or the use of property within, the proposed subdivision; or
substantially equivalent alternative easements are provided.
7. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R’s) shall be required that incorporate the
planned development conditions of approval to ensure that the site retains the qualities
(architecture, colors, materials, street amenities, fencing, and landscaping) over time.
8. The proposed subdivision design and type of improvements proposed will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public.
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
SECTION 2. Approval. The City Council of the City of Atascadero, in a regular
session assembled on September 9, 2014, resolved to approve Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 2014-
0101) subject to the following:
1. Exhibit A: Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 2014-0101
2. Exhibit B: Conditions of Approval / Mitigation Monitoring Program.
On motion by Council Member ______________________, and seconded by Council Member
_________________________, the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA
By:______________________________
Tom O’Malley, Mayor
Attest:
______________________________________
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________
Brian Pierik, City Attorney
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Exhibit A: Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 2014-0101
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Exhibit B: Conditions of Approval / Mitigation Monitoring Program
Tentative Parcel Map 2014-0101
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
Tentative Parcel Map
TPM 2014-0101
Timing
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
SIP: Subdivision
Improvement Plans
FM: Final Map
TO: Temporary
Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
AMWC: Water Comp.
Mitigation
Measure
Planning Services
1. The approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall not become
final and effective following approval of Zone Change 2014-0173 and
CUP 2014-0282.
FM PS
2. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall be valid for two
years after its effective date. At the end of the period, the approval shall
expire and become null and void unless an extension of time is granted
pursuant to a written request received prior to the expiration date.
FM
PS
3. The Community Development Department shall have the
authority to approve minor changes to the project that (1) result in a
superior site design or appearance, and/or (2) address a design issue
that is not substantive to the Tentative Parcel Map and that the Final
Map is in substantial conformance with the Tentative Map.
FM
PS
4. The Parcel Map shall be subject to additional fees for park
or recreation purposes (QUIMBY Act) as required by City Ordinance.
FM
PS
5. The granting of this entitlement shall apply to the property
located at 10380 El Camino Real (APN 056-383-021) regardless of
owner.
On going PS
6. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless
the City of Atascadero or its agents, officers, and employees against
any claim or action brought to challenge an approval by the city, or any
of its entities, concerning the subdivision.
FM PS
7. The Final Map shall be drawn in substantial conformance
with the approved tentative map, and in compliance with all conditions
set forth herein, shall be submitted for review and approval in
accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City’s Subdivision
Ordinance.
FM PS
8. Affordable Housing Requirement: The applicant shall either designate
one unit as moderate-income unit, deed-restricted for a 30-year period,
or pay an in-lieu fee of 5% of the valuation of the four market rate units.
Deed restriction shall be recorded concurrent with final map, or in-lieu
fees shall be paid at time of building permit issuance.
FM, BP PS, CE
10. A deed notification shall be recorded on Lot 4 to notify the property
owner of the City easement for maintenance of the drainage feature,
and to notify the property owner of the Department of Fish and Wildlife
FM PS
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
Tentative Parcel Map
TPM 2014-0101
Timing
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
SIP: Subdivision
Improvement Plans
FM: Final Map
TO: Temporary
Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
AMWC: Water Comp.
Mitigation
Measure
jurisdictional boundaries of the wetland area.
11. An easement shall be dedicated and recorded on favor of the adjacent
parcel to the south (APN 056-383-022) to allow shared access of the
interior driveway along the property line of the subject parcel at APN
056-383-021. If the adjacent property develops in the future, it shall be
permitted to utilize the 20-foot driveway on the subject parcel for
shared access.
FM PS
12. Prior to Final Map, the applicant shall submit CC&Rs for review and
approval by the City Engineer, City Attorney, and Community
Development Department. The CC&R’s shall record with the Final Map
and shall include the following:
a. Provisions for maintenance of all common areas including access,
fire turn around, street trees, fencing and landscaping.
b. The CC&R’s shall state that all exterior colors, exterior materials,
yard fencing, and site landscaping shall be consistent with the
overall master plan of development.
c. A detailed list of each individual homeowner’s responsibilities for
maintenance of the individual units.
d. Individual unit’s responsibility for keeping all trash receptacles
behind fences at rear side yards.
e. A provision for review and approval by the City Community
Development Department for any changes to the CC&R’s that
relate to the above requirements prior to the changes being
recorded or taking effect.
BP
PS
13. The emergency services and facility maintenance costs listed below
shall be 100% funded by the project in perpetuity. The service and
maintenance costs shall be funded through a community facilities
district established by the City at the developer's cost. The funding
mechanism must be in place prior to or concurrently with acceptance of
the final maps. The funding mechanism shall be approved by the City
Attorney, City Engineer and Administrative Services Director prior to
acceptance of any final map. The administration of the above
mentioned funds shall be by the City. Developer agrees to participate
in the community facilities district and to take all steps reasonably
required by the City with regard to the establishment of the district and
assessment of the property.
All Atascadero Police Department service costs to the project.
All Atascadero Fire Department service costs to the project.
Off-site common City of Atascadero park facilities maintenance
service costs related to the project
FM PS
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
Tentative Parcel Map
TPM 2014-0101
Timing
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
SIP: Subdivision
Improvement Plans
FM: Final Map
TO: Temporary
Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
AMWC: Water Comp.
Mitigation
Measure
14. All tract maintenance costs listed below shall be 100% funded by the
project in perpetuity. The service and maintenance cost shall be
funded through a maintenance agreement or Home Owners
Association established by the developer subject to City approval. The
maintenance agreement or HOA shall be approved by the City
Attorney, City Engineer and Administrative Services Director, must be
in place prior to, or concurrently with acceptance of any final maps.
The administration of the above mentioned funds, and the coordination
and performance of maintenance activities, shall be the responsibility
of the Home Owners Association, or the individual property owners as
outlined in the maintenance agreement.
All streets, sidewalks, shared driveways, shared and sewer mains
within the project.
All drainage facilities and detention basins.
All common landscaping areas, street trees, parkway planters,
manufactured slopes outside private yards, and other similar
facilities.
All frontage landscaping, street trees and sidewalks along arterial
roads, including the El Camino Real frontage
FM PS
City Engineer Standard Conditions
1. All public improvements shall be designed and constructed in
conformance with the City of Atascadero Engineering Department
Standard Specifications and Drawings and/or as directed by the City
Engineer.
FM/FO PW
2. In the event that the applicant is allowed to bond for the public
improvements required as a condition of this map, the applicant shall
enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City Council.
FM PW
3. An engineer’s estimate of probable cost shall be submitted for review
and approval by the City Engineer to determine the amount of the
bond.
FM PW
4. The Subdivision Improvement Agreement shall record concurrently
with the Final Map.
FM PW
5. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to the issuance of
building permit.
BP PW
6. A six (6) foot Public Utility Easement (PUE) shall be provided
contiguous to the El Camino Real property frontage.
FM PW
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
Tentative Parcel Map
TPM 2014-0101
Timing
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
SIP: Subdivision
Improvement Plans
FM: Final Map
TO: Temporary
Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
AMWC: Water Comp.
Mitigation
Measure
7. The applicant is responsible for the relocation and/or alteration of any
existing utilities that need to be relocated.
BP PW
8. The applicant shall install all new utilities (water, gas, electric, cable TV
and telephone) underground from the point of connection established
by the public utility provider. Utilities shall be extended to the property
line frontage of each lot or its public utility easement.
BP PW
9. The applicant shall monument all property corners for construction
control and shall promptly replace them if disturbed.
FM PW
10. The applicant shall acquire title interest in any off-site land that may be
required to allow for the construction of the public improvements. The
applicant shall bear all costs associated with the necessary
acquisitions. The applicant shall also gain concurrence from all
adjacent property owners whose ingress and egress is affected by
these improvements.
FM PW
11. Slope easements shall be provided, as needed, to accommodate cut
or fill slopes.
FM PW
12. Drainage easements shall be provided, as needed, to accommodate
both public and private drainage facilities.
FM PW
13. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for review in
conjunction with the processing of the parcel map.
FM PW
14. All existing and proposed utility, pipeline, open space, or other
easements are to be shown on the parcel map. If there are building or
other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the
parcel map. The applicant shall show all access restrictions on the
parcel map.
FM PW
15. The Final Map shall be acceptable to the City Surveyor or City
Engineer prior to the map being placed on the agenda for City Council
acceptance.
FM PW
16. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall submit a map
drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and
in compliance with all conditions set forth herein. The map shall be
submitted for review and approval by the City in accordance with the
Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance.
FM PW
17. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall set monuments at
all new property corners. A registered civil engineer or licensed land
surveyor shall indicate by certificate on the parcel map, that corners
have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be
sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced.
FM PW
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
Tentative Parcel Map
TPM 2014-0101
Timing
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
SIP: Subdivision
Improvement Plans
FM: Final Map
TO: Temporary
Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
AMWC: Water Comp.
Mitigation
Measure
18. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall pay all
outstanding plan check/inspection fees.
FM PW
19. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall complete all
improvements required by these conditions of approval.
FM PW
20. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall have the map
reviewed by all applicable public and private utility companies (cable,
telephone, gas, electric, Atascadero Mutual Water Company). The
applicant shall obtain a letter from each utility company indicating their
review of the map. The letter shall identify any new easements that
may be required by the utility company. A copy of the letter shall be
submitted to the City. New easements shall be shown on the parcel
map
FM PW
21. Prior to the final inspection of any public improvements, the applicant
shall submit as-built drawings and a written statement from a registered
civil engineer that all work has been completed and is in full
compliance with the approved plans.
BP PW
22. Prior to the final inspection, the applicant shall submit a written
certification from a registered civil engineer or land surveyor that all
survey monuments have been set as shown on the final map.
BP PW
City Engineer Project Conditions
23. Driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with City
standards and shall include a 4-foot wide unobstructed pedestrian
sidewalk around the approach. If necessary, applicant shall supply
public pedestrian easement to allow for 4-foot wide unobstructed
pedestrian sidewalk.
FM/BP PW
24. All sewer laterals serving buildings where the finish floor is less than
12-inches above the next upstream manhole shall be fitted with a
backflow prevention device.
FM/BP PW
25. The project plan submittal shall include a detailed hydrology report
addressing storm water run-off for the pre- and post-development
(on-site). The analysis shall be prepared consistent with City and
State standards for storm water detention/retention and treatment to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
FM/BP PW
26. The project shall be designed in compliance with the Cities post-
construction drainage standards and specifications and in
accordance with stormwater regulations/orders adopted by the State
of California (effective March 6, 2014). Projects that propose 2,500
sq. ft. or more of impervious surface area shall prepare a stormwater
analysis demonstrating how the proposed design is capable of
supporting the water management zone criteria and post-
construction performance requirements prior to submittal of
FM/BP PW
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
Tentative Parcel Map
TPM 2014-0101
Timing
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
SIP: Subdivision
Improvement Plans
FM: Final Map
TO: Temporary
Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
AMWC: Water Comp.
Mitigation
Measure
construction documents.
27. Stormwater detention/retention as well as water quality shall
conform to the City and State requirements.
FM/BP PW
28. New water facilities and services shall be designed and constructed
in accordance with the requirements of the Atascadero Mutual
Water Company.
FM/BP PW
29. Wastewater discharge shall conform to City requirements and shall
connect to a public sewer main, to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.
FM/BP PW
30. Wastewater fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. FM/BP PW
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure 1.d. 1: All lighting shall be designed to eliminate any off
site glare. All exterior site lights shall utilize full cut-off, “hooded” lighting
fixtures to prevent offsite light spillage and glare. Any luminaire pole height
shall not exceed 12-feet in height, limit intensity to 2.0 foot candles at
ingress /egress. No light shall be permitted to spill off-site. Fixtures shall
be shield cut-off type.
BP BS/PS 1.d.1
Mitigation Measure 3.b.1: The project shall be conditioned to comply with
all applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust
(PM-10) as contained in Section 2 “Assessing and Mitigating Construction
Impacts.”
2.3.1 Standard Mitigation Measures for Construction Equipment
Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to
manufacturer’s specifications;
Fuel all off-road and portable diesel power equipment with ARB
certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (non-taxed version suitable for
use off-road);
Use diesel construction equipment meeting ARB’s Tier 2 certified
engines or cleaner off-road heavy duty diesel engines, and
comply with State off-Road Regulations;
Use on-road heavy duty trucks that meet ARB’s 2007 or cleaner
certification standard for on-road heavy duty diesel engines, and
comply with State On-Road Regulation;
Construction or trucking companies with fleets that do not have
engines in their fleet that meet the engine standards identified in
the above two measures (e.g. captive or NOx exempt area fleets)
may be eligible by proving alternative compliance;
All on and off-road diesel equipment shall not idle for more than 5
minutes. Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas
and or job sites to remind drivers and operators of the 5 minute
idling limit;
Diesel idling within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors is not
permitted;
BP BS/PS 3.b.1
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
Tentative Parcel Map
TPM 2014-0101
Timing
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
SIP: Subdivision
Improvement Plans
FM: Final Map
TO: Temporary
Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
AMWC: Water Comp.
Mitigation
Measure
Staging and queuing areas shall not be located within 1,000 feet
of sensitive receptors;
Electrify equipment when feasible;
Substitute gasoline-powered in place of diesel-powered
equipment, where feasible; and
Use alternatively fueled construction equipment on- site where
feasible, such as compressed natural gas (CNG), liquefied natural
gas (LNG), propone or biodiesel.
2.4 Fugitive Dust Mitigation Measures: Expanded List
A. Reduce the amount of the disturbed areas where possible;
B. Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to
prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased watering
frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15
mph. Reclaimed (non-potable) water should be used whenever
possible;
C. All dirt stock pile areas should be sprayed daily as needed;
D. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved
project revegetation and landscape plans should be implemented
as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing
activities;
E. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates
greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with a
fast germinating, non-invasive grass seed and water until
vegetation is established;
F. All disturbed soil area not subject to revegetation should be
stabilized using approved chemical soil binder, jute netting, or
other methods approved in advance by the APCD;
G. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. to be paved should be
completed as soon as possible. In addition, building pads should
be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil
binders are used;
H. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15
mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site;
I. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be
covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard
(minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer)
in accordance with CVC Section 23114;
J. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved
roads onto streets, or wash off trucks and equipment leaving the
site;
K. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is
carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with
reclaimed water should be used where feasible;
L. All of these fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be shown on
grading and building plans;
M. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or person to
monitor the fugitive dust emissions and enhance the
implementation of the measures as necessary to minimize dust
complains, reduce visible emission below 20% opacity, and to
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
Tentative Parcel Map
TPM 2014-0101
Timing
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
SIP: Subdivision
Improvement Plans
FM: Final Map
TO: Temporary
Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
AMWC: Water Comp.
Mitigation
Measure
prevent transport of dust offsite. Their duties shall include holidays
and weekend periods when work may not be in progress. The
name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to
the APCD Compliance Division prior to the start of any grading,
earthwork or demolition.
Mitigation Measure 3.b.2: The project shall be conditioned to comply with
all applicable APCD regulations pertaining to Naturally Occurring Asbestos
(NOA). Prior to any grading activities a geologic evaluation should be
conducted to determine if NOA is present within the area that will be
disturbed. If NOA is not present, and exemptions request must be filed with
the District. If NOA is found at the site, the applicant must comply with all
requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM. This may include
development of an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan and an Asbestos Health
and Safety program for approval by the APCD. Technical Appendix 4.4 of
the SLO County APCD CEQA Air Quality Handbook includes a map of
zones throughout San Luis Obispo County where NOA has been found
and geological evaluation is required prior to any grading.
BP BS/PS 3.b.2
Mitigation Measure 3.b.3: The project shall be conditioned to comply with
all applicable APCD regulations pertaining to demolition. Demolition
activities can have potential negative air quality impacts, including issues
surrounding proper handling, demolition, and disposal of asbestos
containing material (ACM). Asbestos containing materials
could be encountered during demolition of existing buildings or can also be
found in utility pipes/pipelines (transite pipes or insulation on pipes). If utility
pipelines are scheduled for removal or relocation or a building(s) is
proposed to be removed or renovated, various regulatory requirements
may apply, including the requirements stipulated in the National Emission
Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (40CFR61, Subpart M - asbestos
NESHAP). These requirements include but are not limited to: 1) notification
to the APCD, 2) an asbestos survey conducted by a Certified Asbestos
Inspector, and, 3) applicable removal and disposal requirements of
identified ACM.
BP BS/PS 3.b.3
Mitigation Measure 3.b.4: Developmental burning of vegetative material is
prohibited within San Luis Obispo County. There shall be no
developmental burning of vegetation on site.
BP BS/PS 3.b.4
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.1: All construction, structures, permanent fences
and grading shall be located beyond the top of bank of the rear drainage
feature known as “Perkins Ditch”. There shall be no removal of vegetation
surrounding the wetland or drainage feature. An 11 foot setback shall be
maintained to the centerline of the drainage ditch according to the
proposed site section drawings (MND Attachment 6.)
BP BS/PS 4.b.c.1
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.2: High‐visibility flagging or fencing shall be
installed along the top of the bank to ensure that the drainage feature is
avoided during construction. Signage will be also installed in association
with the flagging/fencing designating the drainage feature as an
environmentally sensitive area. All construction activities and personnel
BP BS/PS 4.b.c.2
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
Tentative Parcel Map
TPM 2014-0101
Timing
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
SIP: Subdivision
Improvement Plans
FM: Final Map
TO: Temporary
Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
AMWC: Water Comp.
Mitigation
Measure
shall remain outside of the flagged/fenced area, and flagging/fencing shall
be maintained for the duration of construction.
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.3: No refueling or maintenance of vehicles or
equipment shall occur within 100 feet of the drainage feature.
BP BS/PS 4.b.c.3
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.4: Spill clean‐up kits and secondary containment
shall be made available and used to prevent spills or leaks from entering
the drainage.
BP BS/PS 4.b.c.4
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.5: Appropriate Best Management Practices (e.g.,
silt fencing, straw wattles, etc.) shall be installed, as necessary, to avoid
and/or minimize silt and sedimentation impacts to the drainage feature.
BP BS/PS 4.b.c.5
Mitigation Measure 4.b.c.6: Any graded areas shall be stabilized with
erosion control hydroseed consisting of native species matching the
existing plant species within the tributary stream. The seed and plant
material shall not contain any introduced plant species. See biological
report for identified plant species.
BP BS/PS 4.b.c.6
Mitigation Measure 4.e.1: All tree removals shall be mitigated according to
the Atascadero Native Tree Ordinance. Mitigation shall include either
replanting on site, or payment of mitigation fees to the Native Tree fund.
BP PS 4.e.1
Mitigation Measure 4.e.2: Grading and excavation and grading work shall
be consistent with the City of Atascadero Tree Ordinance. Special
precautions when working around native trees include:
1. All existing trees outside of the limits of work shall remain.
2. Earthwork shall not exceed the limits of the project area.
3. Low branches in danger of being torn from trees shall be
pruned prior to any heavy equipment work being done.
4. Vehicles and stockpiled material shall be stored outside the drip
line of all trees.
5. All trees within the area of work shall be fenced for protection
with 4-foot chain link, snow or safety fencing placed per the
approved tree protection plan. Tree protection fencing shall be
in place prior to any site excavation or grading. Fencing shall
remain in place until completion of all construction activitie s.
6. Any roots that are encountered during excavation shall be clean
cut by hand and sealed with an approved tree seal.
BP PS 4.e.2
Mitigation 5.b.1: In the event that archaeological resources are discovered
on the property, all work on the project shall stop. When a project will
impact an archeological site, the Atascadero Community Development
Department shall first determine whether the site is a historical resource. If
a lead agency determines that the archaeological site is an historical
resource, it shall refer to the Public Resources Code Sections for guidance.
If an archaeological resource is neither a unique archaeological nor an
historical resource, the effects of the project on those resources shall not
be considered a significant effect on the environment.
BP/GP PS/BS 5.b.1
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
Tentative Parcel Map
TPM 2014-0101
Timing
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
SIP: Subdivision
Improvement Plans
FM: Final Map
TO: Temporary
Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
AMWC: Water Comp.
Mitigation
Measure
Mitigation 5.d.1: In the event that human remains are discovered on the
property, all work on the project shall stop and the Atascadero Police
Department and the County Coroner shall be contacted. The Atascadero
Community Development Department shall be notified. If the human
remains are identified as being Native American, the California Native
American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be contacted at (916) 373-
3710 within 24 hours. A representative from listed tribes shall be notified
and present during the excavation of any remains.
Ongoing PS 5.d.1
Mitigation Measure 6.b.1: Any grading permit application plans shall
include erosion control measures to prevent soil, dirt, and debris from
entering the storm drain system during and after construction. A separate
plan shall be submitted for this purpose and shall be subject to review and
approval by City staff at the time of Building Permit application.
BP BS/PS 6.b.1
Mitigation Measure 6.b.2: All cut and fill slopes shall be hydro seeded with
an appropriate erosion control method (erosion control blanket, hydro -
mulch, or straw mulch appropriately anchored) immediately after
completion of earthwork. All disturbed slopes shall have appropriate
erosion control methods in place. Duration of the project: The contractor
will be responsible for the clean-up of any mud or debris that is tracked
onto public streets by construction vehicles.
BP BS/PS 6.b.2
Mitigation Measure 6.c.d.1: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the
applicant will submit a soils report to Building Department. The building
plans will be required to follow the recommendations of the soils report to
assure safety for residents and buildings. The soils report will ensure that
the proposed project site and building location will not be subject to
geological events.
BP BS/PS 6.c.d.1
Mitigation Measure 9.e.f.1: The developer is responsible for ensuring that
all contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such
measures are implemented. Failure to comply with the approved
construction Best Management Practices will result in the issuance of
correction notices, citations, or stop orders.
BP BS/PS 9.e.f.1
Mitigation Measure 9.e.2.
ii) Limit disturbance of creeks and natural drainage feature
iii) Minimize compaction of highly permeable soils
iv) Limit clearing and grading of native vegetation at the site to the
minimum area needed to build the project, allow access, and
provide fire protection.
v) Minimize impervious surfaces by concentrating improvements on
the least-sensitive portions of the site, while leaving the remaining
land in a natural undisturbed state
vi) Minimize storm water runoff by implementing one of more of the
following site design measures:
(1) Direct roof runoff into cisterns or rain barrels for reuse
(2) Direct roof runoff onto vegetated areas safely away from
BP BS/PS 9.e.2.
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
10380 El Camino Real
Tentative Parcel Map
TPM 2014-0101
Timing
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
SIP: Subdivision
Improvement Plans
FM: Final Map
TO: Temporary
Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
AMWC: Water Comp.
Mitigation
Measure
building foundations and footings, consistent with
California Building code
(3) Direct runoff from sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios,
driveways, and/or uncovered parking lots onto vegetated
areas safely away from building foundations and
footings, consistent with California Building Code.
(4) Construct driveways uncovered parking lots, walkways,
and patios with permeable surfaces. (Central Coast
Water Control Board, 2013)
Mitigation Measure 12.d.1: All construction activities shall comply with the
City of Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours of operation.
BP BS/PS 12.d.1
Mitigation Measure 16. e.1: The proposed home shall be compliant with
Atascadero Fire Department Standards including the appropriate slope of
driveway, materials used to construct the driveway (paved), and a required
fire turnaround on site. (Atascadero Fire Department)
BP BS/PS 16.e.1
ITEM NUMBER: C-1
DATE: 09/09/14
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report - City Manager’s Office
Transfer of PG&E Rule 20A Credits
To the City of Paso Robles
RECOMMENDATION:
Council authorize the City Manager to execute the Memorandum of Understanding
Between the City of Atascadero and the City of Paso Robles to Transfer $500,000 of
PG&E Rule 20A Credits.
DISCUSSION:
PG&E collects and annually allocates Rule 20A work credits to communities for the
purpose of directing a portion of their anticipated capital outlay budget towards
undergrounding of electric facilities within an approved Underground Utility District.
When a community is ready to adopt an Underground Utility District , they must apply to
PG&E so that PG&E may begin the undergrounding work. From the time a community
applies for a District to be formed to actual credits being available for expenditure, the
process usually takes 7-10 years. This is because the Rule 20A credits are only a
“credit” (not real cash) and the actual cash available is dependent on PG&E’s actual
budget for capital outlay.
The City of Paso Robles began their Undergrounding District request in early 1995.
Due to the downturn in the economy, and because the City of San Francisco used most
of the available Rule 20A funds, it was not until 2012 that PG&E notified the City of
Paso Robles that they now have actual budget available that can be adopted for the
undergrounding of overhead utilities along Riverside from 12th to 17th streets. In the
meantime, the City of Paso Robles received a grant and began preparations to repave
Riverside Avenue from 10th to 17th streets.
When PG&E went out to bid for the undergrounding work, they found that Paso’s
available Rule 20A credits had a shortfall of nearly $500,000. Paso needs the
undergrounding work to happen because of the grant they have received to repave this
road; they do not want to lose the opportunity to take advantage of grant funding.
ITEM NUMBER: C-1
DATE: 09/09/14
As Rule 20A credit “lending” is frequently done between communities, PG&E suggested
that the City of Paso Robles contact us to determine if they could “borrow” $500,000 of
our Rule 20A credit.
The City of Atascadero currently has $3,066,797 of credits in our Rule 20A account.
Until recently, these funds could only be used to cover the cost to underground the
PG&E main lines and could not be used to cover the cost to underground connections
to individual businesses and or residences. Because of the fiscal impact to individual
businesses, the City has not actively applied to use the Rule 20A credits available to the
City. The City does not have a current application in for an underground utility district
and if the City applied today, it would be an estimated 7 -10 years before the credits
would become available for our use. As such, these Rule 20A credits are currently
available for loan to another City without having an immediate impact on the City of
Atascadero.
Paso Robles receives an annual Rule 20A credit of $84,816. If the Council approves a
loan of $500,000 of our Rule 20A credits, the City of Paso Robles would make annual
“payments” in the amount of $84,816 back to Atascadero via credit transfers. The
repayment/credit transfers would take place over the course of six years beginning in
June, 2015 until the full $500,000 has been “repaid.” The City does not receive
“interest” on its’ Rule 20A credits held by PG&E, thus the City of Paso Robles is
proposing a no interest loan and asking for our assistance as a neighboring City. The
City of Paso Robles is willing to reimburse the City of Atascadero for staff time spent
preparing the documents and administering the loan.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None. Loaning Rule 20A PG&E credits has no direct fiscal impact on the City; however
the loan would reduce the credits in the City of Atascadero Rule 20A account. These
credits would be built back up over the following six years as the City of Paso Robles
transfers their annual earned Rule 20A credits to the City of Atascadero in order to
repay the loan.
ALTERNATIVES:
The Council may decide against loaning PG&E Rule 20A credits to the City of Paso
Robles.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Request for Loan of Rule 20A funds from Jim App of the City of Paso Robles
2. Draft Memorandum of Understanding between the Cities of Atascadero and Paso
Robles to Transfer PG&E Rule 20A Credits
ITEM NUMBER: C-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 1
ITEM NUMBER: C-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 2
ITEM NUMBER: C-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 2
ITEM NUMBER: C-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 2
ITEM NUMBER: C-1
DATE: 09/09/14
ATTACHMENT: 2