HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC_2006-04-04_AgendaPacketCITY OF ATASCADERO
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, April 4, 2006 — 7:00 P.M.
City Hall
Council Chambers
6907 El Camino Real
Atascadero, California
CALL TO ORDER
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call: Chairperson Beraud
Vice Chairperson O'Keefe
Commissioner Fonzi
Commissioner Jones
Commissioner Kelley
Commissioner Porter
Commissioner Slane
PLANNING COMMISSION BUSINESS
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
DISCLOSURE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS:
Prior to a project hearing Planning Commission Members must disclose any communications
they have had on any quasi-judicial agenda items. This includes, but is not limited to, tentative
subdivision maps, parcel maps, variances, conditional use permits, and planned development
permits. This does not disqualify the Planning Commission Member from participating and
voting on the matter, but gives the public and applicant an opportunity to comment on the ex
parte communication.
PUBLIC COMMENT
(This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Commission on any matter not
on this agenda and over which the Commission has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to five minutes.
Please state your name and address for the record before making your presentation. The Commission may
take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda)
CONSENT CALENDAR
(All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and non -controversial by City Staff and will
be approved by one motion if no member of the Commission or public wishes to comment or ask questions)
City of Atascadero Planning Commission Agenda
Regular Meeting April 4, 2006
Page 2 of 4
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING ON MARCH 21, 2006.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORTS
2. 2005 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PUBLIC HEARINGS
(For each of the following items, the public will be given an opportunity to speak. After a staff report, the Chair will open the public
hearing and invite the applicant or applicant's representative to make any comments. Members of the public will be invited to provide
testimony to the Commission following the applicant. Speakers should state their name and address for the record and can address the
Commission for five minutes. After all public comments have been received, the public hearing will be closed, and the Commission
will discuss the item and take appropriate action(s).)
3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2006-0177, PATRIA CIRCLE
Owners:
Mark Owens, 919 Patria Circle, Atascadero, CA 93422
Karen Reed, 924 Patria Circle, Atascadero, CA 93422
Applicant:
Dennis Reed, 2455 Reyna Drive, Hayward, CA 94541
Project Title:
Conditional Use Permit 2006-0177
Project
919 Patria Circle, Atascadero, CA 93422, APN 045-357-016
Location:
924 Patria Circle, Atascadero, CA 93422, APN 045-357-013
General Plan Designation: HDR
Zoning District: RMF-16/PD-7
Project
The project is a request to amend an existing Master Plan of Development to allow enclosure of patio
Description:
areas and/or minor additions, on a case by case basis with Planning Commission approval of a Minor
Conditional Use Permit.
Proposed
Class 1 (e) Categorical Exemption — Addition to existing structure of less than 50% of the existing
Environmental
floor area, in an area served by public services.
Determination:
City of Atascadero Planning Commission Agenda
Regular Meeting April 4, 2006
Page 3 of 4
4. RECONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2003-0040
Owner /
Linda Kennedy, Maverick Construction, P.O. Box 4242, Paso Robles, CA 93447
Applicant:
Phone: 239-0134
Project Title:
5516 Tunitas Avenue Colony House; Tentative Parcel Map 2003-0040 for a 4 -lot PD -7 Subdivision
Project
5516 Tunitas Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422 (Single -Family Residence)
Location:
(San Luis Obispo County) APN 029-081-003.
Project
The proposed project consists of a Reconsideration/Reinstatement of the Tentative Parcel Map (TPM
Description:
2003-0040; AT 03-0108) for a Planned Development — 7 project which is currently under construction.
The Tentative Parcel Map would allow for three new single-family lots and the retention of one lot
with an existing historic single-family home. The project is currently being developed under the
requirements of the PD -7 Overlay District within the Residential Multi -Family (RMF -10) Zoning
District. The original approval of the Tentative Parcel Map expired, in accordance with the Subdivision
Map Act, before the applicants could finish the Final Map process.
General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential — MDR
Zoning District: Residential Multiple Family — RMF -10
Proposed
Consistent with Certified Mitigated Negative Declaration 2003-0034, certified by the Atascadero City
Environmental
Council on October 28, 2003.
Determination:
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS AND REPORTS
DIRECTOR'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be on April 18, 2006 at City Hall,
Council Chambers, 6907 El Camino Real, Atascadero.
Please note: Should anyone challenge in court any proposed development entitlement listed
on this Agenda, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public
hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning
Commission at, or prior to this public hearing.
City of Atascadero Planning Commission Agenda Regular Meeting April 4, 2006
Page 4 of 4
City of Atascadero
WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
The Planning Commission meets in regular session on the first and third Tuesday of each month at 7:00
p.m., at City Hall, Council Chambers, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero. Matters are considered by the
Commission in the order of the printed Agenda.
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the
Agenda are on file in the office of the Community Development Department and are available for public
inspection during City Hall Annex business hours at the Community Development counter and on our
website, www.atascadero.org. An agenda packet is also available for public review at the Atascadero
Library, 6850 Morro Road. All documents submitted by the public during Commission meetings that are
either read into the record or referred to in their statement will be noted in the minutes and available for
review in the Community Development Department.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in
a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office, (805)
461-5000, or the City Clerk's Office, (805) 461-5000. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or
time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be
made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS
Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Chairperson will identify the
subject, staff will give their report, and the Commission will ask questions of staff. The Chairperson will
announce when the public comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the
Commission regarding the matter being considered to step up to the podium. If you wish to speak for,
against, or comment in any way:
• You must approach the podium and be recognized by the Chairperson
• Give your name and address (not required)
• Make your statement
• All comments should be made to the Chairperson and Commission
• All comments limited to 5 minutes (unless changed by the Commission)
• No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity
to do so, and no one may speak more than twice on any item.
If you wish to use a computer presentation to support your comments, you must notify the Community
Development Department at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Access to hook up your laptop to the
City's projector will be provided. You are required to submit to the Recording Secretary a printed copy
of your presentation for the record. Please check in with the Chairperson before the meeting begins to
announce your presence and turn in the printed copy.
The Chairperson will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further
public comments will be heard by the Council.
TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA
Under Agenda item, "PUBLIC HEARINGS", the Chairperson will call for anyone from the audience having
business with the Commission to:
• Please approach the podium and be recognized
• Give your name and address (not required)
• State the nature of your business
This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Commission's attention. A maximum of
30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum (unless changed by the Commission).
CALL TO ORDER
ITEM NUMBER: 1
DATE: 4-4-06
CITY OF ATASCADERO
PLANNING COMMISSION
DRAFT MINUTES
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, March 21, 2006 — 7:00 P.M.
Chairperson Beraud called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and Commissioner Slane
led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Fonzi, Kelley, Porter, Slane and Chairperson
Beraud
Absent: Commissioner Jones and Vice Chairperson O'Keefe
Staff Present: Community Development Director Warren Frace, Public Works
Director / City Engineer Steve Kahn, Deputy Community
Development Director Steve McHarris, Associate Planner Kelly
Gleason, Planning Technician Paul Tabone and Recording
Secretary Grace Pucci.
Community Development Director Warren Frace introduced new Planning Technician
Paul Tabone.
PLANNING COMMISSION BUSINESS
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: By Commissioner Porter and seconded by Commissioner
Kelley to approve the agenda.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll -call vote.
PC Draft Minutes 03/21/06
Page 1 of 6
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING ON MARCH 7, 2006.
2. ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL MAP 2005-0128, 3600 TRAFFIC WAY (TPM 2005-
0171) GENE BARRE
MOTION: By Commissioner Kelley and seconded by Commissioner
Porter to approve Items #1 and 2.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll -call vote. (Commissioner Fonzi
abstained on Item #2 stating she is related to the applicant by
marriage.)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORTS
3. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 2006-0086
Owner:
Atascadero Unified School District, 5601 West Mall, Atascadero, CA 93422
Applicant:
Steve Kahn, City of Atascadero, 6907 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422
Project Title:
Tree Removal Permit 2006-0177
Project
Lewis Avenue Bridge Project Site, APN 029-361-001
Location:
General Plan Designation: Downtown / Open Space
Zoning District: DC, DO / L, P, OS
Project
A request to remove nine existing native trees: eight (8) native Black Walnut trees totaling 119 inches
Description:
(dbh) and one (1) native 5" (dbh) Live Oak tree, for the construction of the Lewis Avenue Bridge. The
bridge will be constructed over Atascadero Creek connecting Lewis Avenue with Capistrano Avenue.
Proposed
On December 15, 2005, the Public Works Department approved the Lewis Avenue Bridge Project.
Environmental
Environmental review was performed by staff in the form of a Precise Plan (PPN-2005-0197) and
Determination:
Mitigated Negative Declaration. The MND identified the nine native trees for removal, requiring a
Tree Removal Permit from the City.
Planning Technician Paul Tabone gave the staff report.
PC Draft Minutes 03/21/06
Page 2 of 6
Public Works Director / City Engineer Steve Kahn answered questions of the
Commission.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
MOTION: By Commissioner Fonzi and seconded by Chairperson Beraud
to adopt Resolution PC 2006-0027 to approve the request to
remove nine native trees subject to the guidelines and
mitigation required by the Atascadero Municipal Code and
Native Tree Ordinance.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll -call vote.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
4. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2005-0076,8290 SANTA YNEZ AVENUE
Owner:
Knute Welsh, 8290 Santa Ynez Ave., Atascadero, CA 93422
Applicant:
Micah Mumford, 7405 San Gabriel, Atascadero, CA 93422
Project Title:
Tentative Parcel Map 2005-0076
Project
8290 Santa Ynez Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422, APN 031-222-008
Location:
General Plan Designation: MDR
Zoning District: RMF -10
Project
The project is a request for a 3 -unit condominium subdivision with one existing dwelling and
Description:
construction of 2 additional dwellings on a Residential Multi -Family — 10 lot.
Proposed
Class 3 (a) Categorical Exemption — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures
Environmental
Determination:
Associate Planner Kelly Gleason gave the staff report and answered questions of the
Commission. A memorandum with an amended resolution was distributed to the
Commission. (Exhibit A)
Ex Parte Communications
■ Chairperson Beraud stated she is friends with the neighbors to the north and had
met with them and showed them the maps and staff report this weekend. In
addition she had visited the site and spoke with the current tenant.
PC Draft Minutes 03/21/06
Page 3 of 6
PUBLIC COMMENT
Micah Mumford, agent for the applicant, spoke about the project and answered
questions of the Commission.
Janet and Mark Anderson, adjacent property owners, expressed several concerns
including: the proximity of the project to their home, the loss of privacy because of the
two-story construction, the density of this and other similar projects intended for their
neighborhood, increased traffic, and safety.
Mathew Thomas, Santa Ynez resident, asked about the watershed that will come off
due to the number of cars in the neighborhood and the lack of gutters, curbs and
sidewalks. He expressed concern regarding the loss of privacy.
Phyllis Thomas stated they were considering removing their pool due to the loss of
privacy with this project and indicated the project would look into her living room.
Chairperson Beraud closed the Public Comment period.
Associate Planner Kelly Gleason and City Engineer Steve Kahn answered questions
raised during Public Comment.
Commissioner Kelley suggested a condition that second story's would have no window
exposure to the east or west, or installation of high windows to maintain privacy.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Micah Mumford stated he has no problem putting 2/0 windows on the east and west
sides.
Mark Anderson stated he was in support of the smaller window or eliminating them all
together.
Chairperson Beraud closed the Public Comment period.
Chairperson Beraud stated she is not comfortable with allowing two story units in a
neighborhood that is entirely one story.
Commissioner Slane stated that one goal of the General Plan is to preserve residential
neighborhoods and that new projects must be compatible with existing neighborhoods
and homes. He indicted that two story units on this side of the street are not compatible
with the neighborhood.
MOTION: By Commissioner Kelley and seconded by Commissioner
Fonzi to adopt Resolution PC 2006-0028 approving Tentative
Parcel Map 2005-0076, a request to establish three (3) airspace
PC Draft Minutes 03/21/06
Page 4 of 6
units on one common lot based on findings and subject to
conditions, and in the design of the two residences in the back
of the property that the walls facing to the east and the west
along the adjoining property lines be limited to 2/0 windows
only to a maximum of 2 feet in height on the 2nd floor, and that
15 gallon landscaping plants to be used and staff to be given
the latitude to put in the ones that would be most appropriate
for a buffer.
Motion passed 3:2 by a roll -call vote. (Slane, Beraud opposed)
Chairperson Beraud stated for the record that she voted against the project because it
is not in the character of neighborhood.
5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2006-0177, PATRIA CIRCLE
TO BE CONTINUED
Owners:
Mark Owens, 919 Patria Circle, Atascadero, CA 93422
Karen Reed, 924 Patria Circle, Atascadero, CA 93422
Applicant:
Dennis Reed, 2455 Reyna Drive, Hayward, CA 94541
Project Title:
Conditional Use Permit 2006-0177
Project
919 Patria Circle, Atascadero, CA 93422, APN 045-357-016
Location:
924 Patria Circle, Atascadero, CA 93422, APN 045-357-013
General Plan Designation: HDR
Zoning District: RMF-16/PD-7
Project
The project is a request to amend a Master Plan of Development to allow enclosure of patio areas
Description:
within a Planned Development resulting in greater than 35% lot coverage.
Proposed
Class 1 (e) Categorical Exemption — Addition to existing structure of less than 50% of the existing
Environmental
floor area, in an area served by public services.
Determination:
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS AND REPORTS
Chairperson Beraud reported that she had requested at the last City Council meeting
that they consider addressing broadcasting of Planning Commission and Council
meetings from the city's website. The issue will be further addressed at the June
strategic planning meeting. She also asked if the motorcycle ordinance is scheduled on
a future agenda. Director Frace said he has not heard that it has.
PC Draft Minutes 03/21/06
Page 5 of 6
DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Community Development Director Warren Frace thanked those Commissioners who
attended the last City Council meeting on condominium conversions and reported that
Council directed staff to come back with an urgency ordinance to freeze the approval of
new condominium conversions received as of March of 2006. The ordinance will be on
the next Council agenda. Director Frace reported that the next City Council meeting will
include a study session at 5:30 p.m. to review a General Plan Amendment for Eagle
Creek Golf Course: all Commissioners are encouraged to attend. In addition the San
Anselmo project has been appealed by a Council Member and will be on their next
agenda, the appeal of the fence Variance will go to Council on May 9th. Director Frace
reviewed the agenda for the next Planning Commission meeting and answered
questions of the Commission.
ADJOURNMENT
Chairperson Beraud adjourned the meeting at 7:55 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled
meeting of the Planning Commission on April 4, 2006.
MEETING RECORDED AND MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Grace Pucci, Recording Secretary
The following exhibit is available for review in the Community Development Department:
Exhibit A — Item #4, Memorandum
PC Draft Minutes 03/21/06
Page 6 of 6
ITEM NUMBER:
K
DATE: 4-4-06
Atascadero Planning Commission
Staff Report - Public Works Department
2005 Five -Year Capital Improvement Program
(City of Atascadero)
SUBJECT:
A review of the City's Five -Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Adopt Resolution PC 2006-0026 notifying the City Council that the Planning
Commission has found the 2005 Five -Year Capital Improvement Program
consistent with the General Plan, based on findings.
Situation and Facts:
1. Applicant: City of Atascadero Public Works Department, 6907
EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422
2. Project Location: Citywide
3. Environmental Status: Consistent with the adopted General Plan EIR and
mitigation monitoring program. Individual CIP
projects are subject to CEQA review.
Background:
The 2002 General Plan identifies the following Policy and Program requiring the City
to prepare, review and approve a Capital Improvement Program that is consistent
with the General Plan Goals, Policies, and Programs, as listed below:
Policy 15.2: Maintain an updated Capital Improvements Program (CIP) that
forecasts needs at least five years into the future and conforms to General plan
policies and programs.
Program 1: The Planning Commission shall annually review the Capital
Improvements Program for consistency with the General Plan and forward its
findings to the City Council.
Staff has prepared this report, attachments, and exhibits for Planning Commission
review, comment, and recommendation to the City Council. Per the General Plan,
this CIP review will occur on an annual basis.
Analysis:
Staff has selected projects for the next five years that will conform to the General
plan policies and programs under the available funding. Listed below are General
Plan Policies and how the Capital Improvement Program complies with them:
• Roads and Bridge Projects
Circulation Element Policy 1.3. Maintain Length of Service (LOS) C or better as the
standard at all intersections and on all arterials and collectors
✓ Interchange Improvement Study and Improvements. Increase capacity and
LOS on interchanges.
Circulation Element Policy 1.1.1. Maintain an updated Capital Improvement Plan and
pursue construction of the circulation system improvements listed in the Table III -11
of the Circulation Element.
✓ Santa Cruz Road, Lewis Ave Bridge, and Garcia Road Bridge are all listed in
Table III -11 of the Circulation Element.
• Drainage Projects
Safety & Noise Element Policy 2.2.2. "Develop a prioritized list of proposed capital
improvement projects for low-lying, flood -prone areas, and seek funding for these
projects."
✓ Drainage Improvement Program. This CIP program focuses projects to mitigate
flooding and drainage impacts. Some of the areas it focuses on are Marchant
Avenue, Traffic Way, Portola Road, San Ramon Road and other areas where
drainage problems occur.
• Facilities Projects
LOC Policy 12.2.2. "Establish a community/youth recreation center in the vicinity of
Downtown."
✓ Construction of new Corporation Yard. This project moved the old Corporation
Yard off a site that can now be used as a Youth Center.
• Parks Projects
LOC Policy 12.2.1. Promote the Zoo, Lake Park, and other City Parks as unique and
valuable attractions.
✓ Lake Park and Zoo Improvements. These projects will improve the Lake Park
and Zoo, per their Master Plans, to enhance the experience and usability of the
facilities.
LOC Policy 12.2.2. "Establish a community/youth recreation center in the vicinity of
Downtown."
✓ Construction of Youth Center. The construction, site improvements and
furnishings for a new Youth Center.
LOC Policy 12.3. "Develop and implement a program to improve water quality in
Atascadero Lake...."
✓ Lake Water Quality. Install and construct improvements to Atascadero Lake,
and the system that fills the Lake, to improve the water quality.
• Miscellaneous Projects
Circulation Element Policy 2.3.4. "Enhance the Downtown streetscape so that it is an
enjoyable experience for pedestrians."
LOC Policy 4.2.3. "Develop a comprehensive streetscape and pedestrian access
plan for the Downtown area.
✓ Downtown Streetscape Projects. Pedestrian and operational improvements
including bulb outs, landscaped medians, street furniture, and lighting for the
Downtown according to the RVC Plan.
✓ Pedestrian Tunnel Improvements. Entrance improvements to the pedestrian
tunnel under US 101 in the Downtown.
LOC Policy 1.3.10. "The City will develop standards and underground districts to
require the under grounding of existing utilities with in the urban core"
✓ Downtown Underground Utility Project. Underground of overhead utilities.
The Planning Commission should review the improvements program for consistency
with the General Plan and forward its findings to the City Council. General Plan
Circulation Capital Improvements Table III -11 (Attachment A), provides a summary
of circulation -related capital improvements to be implemented. The proposed Five -
Year CIP incorporates improvements from this adopted list to be constructed.
Findings:
As identified in the General Plan, and attached as Exhibit A, the Capital
Improvement Plan shall be approved by the City Council with appropriate findings,
as follows:.
(i) The updated Capital Improvements Program forecasts needs at least five years
into the future and conforms to General Plan Goals, Policies and Programs and
the overall intent of the General Plan;
(ii) Implementation of the Capital Improvements Program aides in providing a safe
and efficient circulation system that serves all segments of the community, and
is designed and constructed to preserve rural character; and
(iii) Implementation of the Capital Improvements Program will not create any new
significant and unavoidable impacts to traffic, infrastructure or public services;
and
(iv) The Capital Improvements Program is consistent with the adopted General
Plan EIR and mitigation monitoring program.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. The Planning Commission may find the CIP inconsistent with the General
Plan.
2. The Planning Commission may continue the application and refer the project
back to staff for additional information or analysis.
PREPARED BY: Steve Kahn, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1: General Plan Summary of Circulation Element Capital
Improvements
Attachment 2: General Plan Circulation Mitigation Projects Map
Attachment 3: Draft Resolution 2006-0026
Attachment 1: General Plan Circulation Capital Improvements (Table III -11)
Table III -11: Summary of Circulation Element Capital Improvements
Key
Road Class
Street/Location
Improvement Type
Comments
A-1
Roadway
San Anselmo: US 101 — Monterey
Road
Circulation/access improvements
A-2
Roadway
Via Road: Ensenada — Mercedes —
Traffic Way
Widen lanes, replace bridge, bike & pedestrian
facilities
A-3
Roadway
Curbaril: ECR to US 101
Circulation/access improvements
A-4
Roadway
Santa Barbara: ECR to US 101
Widen to 4 -lanes
A-5
Roadway
Santa Cruz: ECR — Carrizo Road
A-6
Roadway
ECR: Santa Barbara — Via Camino
Widen to 4 lanes; bikeway; Sidewalks
A-7
Roadway
ECR: Via Camino — Santa Rosa
Raised median; channelization; bikeway
A-8
Roadway
ECR: Santa Rosa — Curbaril
Raised median; channelization; bikeway
A-9
Roadway
ECR: Curbaril — SR 41
Raised median; channelization; bikeway
A-10
Roadway
ECR: SR 41— Rosario
Raised median; bulb -outs; channelization; bikeway
A-11
Roadway
ECR: Rosario — San Anselmo
Raised median; channelization; bikeway
A-12
Roadway
ECR: San Anselmo — Del Rio
Raised median; channelization; bikeway
A-13
Roadway
ECR: Del Rio — Santa Cruz
Widen to 4 Lanes; raised median; channelization;
bikeway
A-14
Roadway
Santa Ysabel: Curbaril — SR 41
Widening; bikeway; sidewalks
A-15
Roadway
Traffic Way / Olmeda - San Jacinto
Frontage improvements
A-16
Roadway
Carmelita/Morro Road
Extend as 2 -lane collector south to Morro Road (SR
41)
A-17
Roadway
Halcon Road: Via Camino — Santa
Barbara
Intersection improvements / roadway improvements
to arterial
A-18
Roadway
Traffic Way / Ardilla / Santa Lucia
Roadway / intersection improvements
B-1
Intersection
ECR/Santa Barbara
Intersection Improvements / signal
B-2
Intersection
ECR/Santa Rosa
Intersection improvements
B-3
Intersection
ECR/Juni ero
Signal
B-4
Intersection
ECR/Curbaril
Intersection improvements
B-5
Intersection
ECR/Traffic Way
Intersection improvements
B-6
Intersection
ECR/W. San Anselmo
Intersection improvements
B-8
Intersection
ECR/E. San Anselmo
Intersection improvements / signal
B-9
Intersection
ECR/Del Rio
Intersection improvements
B-10
Intersection
ECR/San Ramon
Signal
B-11
Intersection
ECR/Pueblo Avenue
Signal
C-1
Bride
Santa Lucia at Graves Creek
Reconstruct bridge
C-2
Bride
Garcia Road at Graves Creek
Reconstruct Bridge
C-3
Bridge
Lewis Avenue
Construct bridge across Atascadero Creek
PSR completed; $2
million
C-4
Bride
Santa Cruz west of San Ramon
Bridge across Graves Creek/ extend road
C-7
Bride
Llano at Graves Creek
Construct Bridge
D-1
US 101 / SR
41
ECR/SR 41/ US 101
Reconstruct Interchange; ramp relocation; signals;
widening
Part of SR 41 funded
project
D-2
SR 41
State Route 41: US 101 —San Gabriel Widen to 4 -lanes
D-3
US 101
Santa Barbara/US 101
Interchange Improvement
D-4
US 101
I
Santa Rosa/US 101
Interchange Improvement
D-5
US 101
Curbaril/US 101
Interchange Improvement
Attachment 1: General Plan Circulation Capital Improvements (Table 111-11)
Key
Road Class
Sth•eet/Location
Improvement Type Comments
D-6
US 101
Traffic Way/US 101
Interchange Improvement
D-7
US 101
San Anselmo/US 101
Interchange Improvement
D-8
US 101
Del Rio/US 101
Interchange Improvement
D-9
US 101
Route US 101 within URL
Operational Improvements
Misc.
Citywide
Safety improvement program
Misc.
Citywide
Traffic calming ro ects
Misc.
Citywide
Dial -A -Ride improvements
Misc.
Citywide
Regional transit improvements
Misc.
Citywide
Park -and -Ride expansion
Misc.
Citywide
Safe routes to school
Misc.
Citywide
Miscellaneous arterial and collector road
maintenance
Misc.
Citywide
Intersection improvements
Misc.
Citywide
Miscellaneous walkways
Misc.
Lewis/Santa Ysabel
Bike route
Misc.
Curbaril/Salinas River Bridge
Bike route
[!�
Misc.
Atascadero to Templeton
Bike route Multi -jurisdictional
project
ATTACHMENT 3: Draft Resolution PC 2006-0026
Variance
DRAFT RESOLUTION PC 2006-0026
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE 2005
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN
(City of Atascadero)
WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero 2002 General Plan requires the Planning
Commission to; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero 2002 General Plan requires the City maintain an
updated Capital Improvement Plan and pursue its implementation; and,
WHEREAS, the project is consistent with the adopted General Plan EIR and
mitigation monitoring program; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public
hearing on April 4, 2006; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, hereby
resolves to take the following actions:
SECTION 1. Findings of Approval. The Planning Commission finds:
(i) The updated Capital Improvement Program forecasts needs at least five years into the
future and conforms to General Plan Goals, Policies and Programs and the overall
intent of the General Plan;
(ii) Implementation of the Capital Improvement Program aides in providing a safe and
efficient circulation system that serves all segments of the community, and is designed
and constructed to preserve rural character; and
(iii) Implementation of the Capital Improvement Program will not create any new
significant and unavoidable impacts to traffic, infrastructure or public services; and
(iv) The Capital Improvement Program is consistent with the adopted General Plan EIR and
mitigation monitoring program.
SECTION 2. Approval. The Planning Commission finds the 2005 Five -Year Capital
Improvement Program consistent with the General Plan and subject to the following:
EXHIBIT A: 2005 Five Year Capital Improvement Plan
On motion by Commissioner , and seconded by Commissioner the
foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote:
AYES: ( )
NOES: ( )
ABSENT: ( )
ABSTAIN: ( )
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA
Ellen Beraud
Planning Commission Chairperson
Attest:
Warren M. Frace
Planning Commission Secretary
EXHIBIT A: 2005 Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan
The following pages give a brief description of the projects proposed for the Five Year
Capital Improvement Plan. (Projects listed in italics are a part of the Five Year Capital
Improvement Program, but do not have funding in fiscal years 2005-2007.)
CATEGORY A: ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Projects identified in this category construct new roads or improve existing roads with
widening or frontage improvements.
Interchange Improvement Study — Study potential operational improvement to increase
capacity and level of service to the following roads crossing US 101 from EI Camino Real to
westerly connectors: Santa Barbara Road, Santa Rosa Road, Curbaril Avenue, San
Anselmo Avenue and Del Rio Road.
Minor Interchange Improvements — Minor improvements to increase capacity and level of
service to the following roads crossing US 101 from EI Camino Real to westerly connectors:
Santa Barbara Road, Santa Rosa Road, Curbaril Avenue, San Anselmo Avenue and Del
Rio Road.
Interchange Improvements — Increase capacity and level of service to the following roads
crossing US 101 from El Camino Real to westerly connectors: Santa Barbara Road, Santa
Rosa Road, Curbaril Avenue, San Anselmo Avenue and Del Rio Road.
Santa Cruz Road Extension — Extend Santa Cruz Road from Carrizo to EI Camino Real.
This project will widen and pave the section of Traffic Way that is unpaved and will complete
the circulation loop identified in the Circulation Element.
San Gabriel Traffic Signal — Construct traffic signal.
US 101/SR 41 Interchange Improvements — Participation in the California Transit project
to reconstruct the interchange.
Traffic Way Improvements at San Jacinto — Widen road, drainage improvements and
pedestrian facilities on Traffic Way near San Jacinto.
North EI Camino Real Improvements — Road widening and frontage improvements north
of Rosario Avenue.
Collector/Arterial Improvements — Improve circulation on collector and arterial.
Miscellaneous Road Improvement Projects — Miscellaneous road improvement projects
that will improve Atascadero's circulation system.
CATEGORY B: ROAD REHABILITATION PROJECTS
Projects identified in this category are intended to restore deteriorated paving surfaces.
La Linea Rehabilitation and Drainage Improvements — Improve the street drainage
system and rehabilitate the street surface in the La Linea area from EI Camino Real to EI
Centro.
2006 / 2007 Road Rehabilitation Projects — The following roads will be overlayed or
rehabilitated:
San Jacinto Road- EI Camino Real to Nogales Avenue
Curbaril Avenue- State Route 41 to US101
Del Rio Road- EI Camino Real to Chico Road
Minor Street Overlay Projects — Small projects to improve road surfaces.
Street Maintenance District Project — Minor repairs and maintenance of roads within each
maintenance district boundary.
Atascadero Avenue at Golf Course — Rehabilitate road surface.
2007/2009 Road Rehabilitation Projects — Projects to rehabilitate the driving surface of
roads in the years 2007-2008 and 2008-2009, based on the Pavement Management
System.
2009/2010 Road Rehabilitation Projects — Projects to rehabilitate the driving surface of
roads in the year 2009-2010, based on the Pavement Management System.
CATEGORY C: BRIDGE PROJECTS
Projects identified in this category are for bridge construction, replacement and repair
projects.
Lewis Avenue Bridge Project — Construct a bridge across Atascadero Creek at Lewis
Avenue for vehicles, pedestrians and bicycles.
Downtown Pedestrian Bridge Project — Design of Downtown Pedestrian Bridge across
Atascadero Creek.
Garcia Road Bridge Project — Design and construct a bridge replacement on Garcia Road
at a tributary of Graves Creek.
State Route 41 to Traffic Way Connection — Construct a new connection from Traffic Way
to SR 41, near the Via Bridge.
Santa Lucia at Graves Creek — Replace existing bridge.
CATEGORY D: DRAINAGE PROJECTS
Projects identified in this category are drainage improvement projects that are intended to
reduce flooding potential or improve the existing drainage system.
2006/2007 Drainage Improvement Program — Design and construction of drainage
projects located at Marchant Avenue, Traffic Way, Portola Road, Colima Road, San Ramon
Road, Los Osos Road, Santa Lucia Avenue, Carmelita Avenue, Del Rio Road, Monterey
Road, Del Rio Road and EI Camino Real.
2010/2011 Drainage Improvement Program — Design and construction of drainage
projects.
CATEGORY E: FACILITIES PROJECTS
Projects identified in this category are improvements to public facilities.
Construction of New Corporate Yard — Construction of facilities for relocation of
Corporation Yard due to December 22, 2003 earthquake.
CATEGORY F: PARKS PROJECTS
Parks projects identified in this category are for repair and enhancement projects.
Lake Park Restroom Access — Renovate Atascadero Lake Park upper restroom to make it
ADA accessible.
Lake Park Master Plan Improvements — Implement additional phases of park
improvements detailed in the Atascadero Lake Park Master Plan.
Zoo Utility Improvements — Design and installation of new sewer, power, water and
communication systems at the Charles Paddock Zoo.
Construction of Youth Center — The construction, site improvements and furnishings for a
new youth center.
Lake Water Quality — Install and construct improvements to Atascadero Lake, and the
system that fills the Lake, to improve the water quality.
Native Tree Planting and Irrigation — Plant and irrigate native trees in miscellaneous
locations.
CATEGORY G: MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS
Projects identified in this category support multi -modal transportation, routes to school,
miscellaneous road repair and advanced studies for future projects.
Downtown Streetscape, Phase II — Pedestrian and operational improvements including
bulb outs, landscaped medians, street furniture, and lighting for the Downtown according to
the RVC plan.
Pedestrian Tunnel Improvements — Entrance Improvements to pedestrian tunnel under
US 101.
Downtown Underground Utility Project — Undergrounding of overhead utilities.
Union Pacific Railroad Crossing — Construction of a new bridge and modifications to
Union Pacific Railroad operating systems. This project is being funded by a private
developer; no City funds will be used.
Road Slope Stabilization Project — Design and construct roadside improvements to
maximize bank stability.
2004/2005 Sidewalk Project — Miscellaneous pedestrian and accessibility improvements.
Downtown Streetscape, Phases 111 and IV — Pedestrian and operational improvements
including bulb outs, landscaped medians, street furniture, and lighting for the Downtown
according to the RVC plan.
Downtown Parking Lot Improvements — Installation of pavers, landscaping and street
furniture in downtown alley.
2007/2009 Pedestrian and Bicycle Paths — Design and construction of projects to improve
pedestrian and bicycle access.
EXHIBIT A: 2005 Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan Spreadsheet
n
0
C1
0
D
o
w
w
O
O
r
0
o
D
�
�
o
�
n
n�i
�
m
O
D
�
�
�
�
N
lQ
O
D
o
m
�
m
m
nri
0
3
o
m
�
:3
m
�.
m
N.
m
0
0
o
a
0
o
m
�
�
x
�
�
�
�
0
—_
�
�
-Di
m
3
�
3
m
3
�
�
y7i
�
cD
N
J
N
�
0
m
N
�
—
.'
3
N
O
O
(n
(D
0
0
61
0_
`
m
(n
�
v
�
i
(D
�
N
O
0
0
C
O
C
x<
N
O
m
�
L
�
O
0
m
�
3
O
J
n
O
7
(D
Af
N
0
0
m
a
p
c
m
N
N
O
N
O
N
O
m
m
O
W
O
a
O
(D
O
(D
°m
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
0
0
G)
W
a
m
W
n
v
CL
m°
a
m
�
�
n
�
W
0
0
D
N
cn
O
0
0
(n
En
n
0
�
�
�
—
0
O
0
cn
co
0
O
b
O
0
0
0
0
m
m
CD
O
j
o
O
O
°1
�
O
O
D
O
U7
O
W
0
N
D
O
O
3
3
Z
N
W
O
O
m
O
v
v
O
0
�
m
0
p
o
0
0
0
0
o
co
0
0
0
D
0
0
0
0
0
o
w
0
O
Q
�
�
0
0
0
0
C)
m
n
a
m
N
N
A
m
O
O
O
3
0
O
O
O
O
m
m�
�
�
n�
a
O
O
O
O
O
O
(D
(D
m
(,°r
m
CD
A
0'
O
x
N
A
A
-+
A
N
(fi
�
M
O
0
O
0
m
m
�
(D
O
O
W
O
N
O
v
0
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
o,
C�
O
o
m'
m
n
m
O
O
(D
p
Q;
o
m
m
m
(D
CD
m'
m'
D
m
(D
n
cn
CD
Z
UD
�
o
m
m
Z
3
3
a
x
O
O
3
zi
CD
O
m
M
n
N
0
fn
i
G7
N
O
'O
_
O
N
m
W
�
W
N D
O
0
O
N
W
O
O
W
O
O
(I1
O
O
O
(O
O
O
p N
O
O
O
O
O
O
A
O
O
O (D
rn a
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
C>
00
o
A
O
O
N
OJ
co
O
(T
O
O N
O
CD
OJ
p
L1
O
O
N m
O N
O
�3
c
O
N
O d
O
O D
0
0o a
0
N m
CD N
0
o
O0 3
0
o d
0
o (D
CD
(c a
0
N m
O N
o ..
o
tO 3
O
n01
O
G
O
O
+ cD
O
O
O CL
O
O
CD o m
p y N
1
ry
v o 3
A
co
Ut
N
O)
(D 61
0
co
0
Z O
O
0
0
(T
O
O a
0
0
UO
0
0
0
0
0
(D
0
-0
0
0
0
0
0
0
�
o
fn
�
n
n�i
�
m
O
D
�
�
�
�
N
lQ
(D
m
�
m
m
3
0
3
61
�
�
3
m
°
m
om
m
o
m
o
a
.D
�
m
�
�
x
�
�
�
�
0
—_
�
�
�
m
3
�
3
�
3
�
�
y7i
�
o
�
0
�
—
.'
3
N
O
O
(n
(D
�
�
`
m
(n
�
�
i
(D
�
N
O
O
O
O
N
m
�
L
�
0
m
�
3
4
N
N
N
O
N
O
N
O
(O
O
W
O
O
(D
O
(D
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
0
N
cn
CO
0
O
0
0
O
0
O
0
O
O
0
0
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
U7
O
W
0
N
O
O
O
O
(D
A
O
W
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
0
0
�
o
0
0
0
0
o
co
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
�
o
fn
�
n
n�i
�
m
O
D
�
�
�
�
N
lQ
(D
m
�
m
m
3
0
3
61
�
�
3
m
°
m
om
m
o
m
o
a
.D
�
m
�
�
x
�
�
�
�
0
—_
�
�
�
m
3
�
3
�
3
�
�
y7i
�
o
�
0
�
—
.'
3
N
O
O
(n
(D
�
�
`
m
(n
�
�
i
(D
�
N
O
O
O
O
N
m
�
L
�
0
m
�
3
4
N
N
(O
O)
OD
(D
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
CO
W
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
N
A
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
A
A
-+
A
N
(fi
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
N
CO
(O
N
�
(D
O
O
W
O
N
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
EXHIBIT A: 2005 Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan Spreadsheet
n
�
m
�
T.
�
�
m
n
o
m
�_
nri
o
nri
�
�c
(D
O
y
O
�
F
N
7r
CD
73-
�
m
o
0
0�
o
�
o
o
D
3
O
D
?
�
�
D
CL
n
�
�
n
n
3
�
m
7
�
�
�
>
>
n
�
m
m
M
m
0
0
0
0
0
cn
m
o
o
G7
W
c
00
o
f
i
F
o
o
�
f
m
f
O
O
O
O
O
O
OD
O
01
O
O
O
O
W
o'
O
(Ji
�
cn
cn
v_�
u�
�
�
cn
�
O
O
0
�
W
N
Cf�
�
CP
O
O
O
o
m
O
O
n
i
m
m���
O
a�
m
0
O
CT
O
O
O
O
O
6
d
O
O
(D
O
O
O
Z
O
O
—
O
�
3
0
D
T
D
0
n�
r
n�
n�
N�
m
O
d
�
O
N
N
Q7
Ut
O
N
�
A
F
n
0
0
0
ou
O
O
m
a1
o
Ca.
O
O
m
co
O
Q)
O
O
O
O
O
C7
r
�°
m
o
n�
m
0
J
�
m�
'p
o
C
�
�
O
CL
-O
�^
N
o
m
O
�
�
N
N
p
N
=.
3
N
CD
5
(D
m
m�
o
N-
O
C.)
O
CD
C
O
n
c-
CD
m
n
O
cncn
`m
n
En
�
N
(D
O
O p
A
co
N
O
O)
N
O
Q)
N
Ul
O
N O
N
O
Cn
Cn
O
A
O
O
O N
N
O
A
O
W
O
O
O (D
T a
CJ
O
(T�
O
O
O
A
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
O
69
N �
c0
O
o O
-4
N
N
V
N
O O
cD
O
O
C71
O
N O
O
O
O
O
O
O N
W
O
O
a
o
0
O
0
0
0
O
0
Gq
N m
O N
N
CT
O +
V
y
V
O
N
O
N
O
O
O
O
o Q
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N m
O N
CD
N
(I�
O �+
O
y
O
O
O
N
O
0
CD
0 CD
CD a
O
Cl
O
O
O
O
u'
N m
_
O N
O �+
co
`D 3
0
o a
0
69
En
CD o m
p� y N
N
A
V1
01
�
N
N
N
U�
rn
O
0
N
0
O
0
O
0
O)
0
N
cn
O
cn
O
o
N
a
O
o
o
Q < a
A
O
O
O
O
N
O
A
O
W
O
O
fD
0
0
0
0
CT
O
A
0
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Cl
n
�
m
�
T.
�
�
m
n
o
m
�_
nri
o
nri
�
�c
(D
O
y
O
�
F
N
7r
CD
3
�
�
?
�
�
D
CL
n
m
�
n
_
3
�
m
�
3
o
__
m
M
`^
M
W
O
N
Cn
A
O
O
O
CO
O
O
O
O
O
OD
O
01
O
O
O
O
W
O
(Ji
O
O
O
O
0
0
W
N
Cf�
O
CP
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
CT
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
0
0
V
O
N
N
Q7
Ut
O
N
�
A
0
0
0
0
0
ou
O
O
O
a1
O
O
O
O
O
co
O
Q)
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
n
�
m
�
T.
�
�
m
n
o
m
�_
nri
o
nri
�
�c
(D
O
y
O
�
F
N
7r
CD
3
�
�
?
�
�
D
CL
n
m
�
n
_
3
�
m
�
3
o
__
m
M
`^
M
W
O
N
Cn
A
O
O
O
CO
O
O
O
O
O
OD
O
01
O
O
O
O
W
O
(Ji
O
O
O
O
0
0
W
N
Cf�
O
CP
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
CT
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
0
0
V
O
N
N
Q7
Ut
O
N
�
A
0
0
0
0
0
ou
O
O
O
a1
O
O
O
O
O
co
O
Q)
O
O
O
O
O
O
EXHIBIT m2oFive-Year Capital Improvement Plan Spreadsheet
_
/;
,/;
e`
a\
`;
;�
!@;m
_
z;
a
l�,�
2�l;
}§
,3;
:-
;n
;0Z,
r(\(j\;
-.m
}C)
M
@2
)§)
(k
®2
77/``2
-
$ƒ
;
;z,f,z;
@o
3>
/\
\)
\_
-OD
}\{}§/..
!/E�<
!
!
\m
.;
;;%o
)/
}§
�\
\
0-0
�`��%\
`
/k
!k
/
)\�
a
<
\
2
)
2
J
§
ƒ
,3
\
)
\7
\
§§\\7
co)....
j
�k
\\)�
\
2
§
\
k/
0z
\
0
k\
,w\
)
j\(
\\\\\
\
\\
\§
{
j{---
/\§
EXHIBIT A: 2005 Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan
DD
omTTn
'9 A��2'i
C/) MO
A►>>
o
�'
o
y
2
o
m
G>
O
H
m 2
n=
c
-
m
m
w
m
Q
p
C) o n`& v
n>>>
m� >$ w m°�-� dg
cN>
a
y
A
n
m
G>
o
o
m
o
v
O
O
x
d
d
o'
3
w
v
3
D
m
j
7
n
D
A
o^
N
3
ch
-�
3
c Q
m
m
v ' z
R
M'—
o
c
m
m 3 0
�.
N
1
T
N
A
^ o m A n N
O
no
m
N c
n
o
__q
wco
C
� 3� v
o
Jp
o
a
o
0
o
m
m
S N
w
yNi
O
A
0
0
0
0
00
0
0
00I
0
^ n T
(n j C
Z
N
61
O
T
o
c
m
C
2
T
QI
N
T
N
Z
O
�
pO
o
w
W N O
C A Q
Z
D -D1
> D m
N
O
O O O
y W
n
cn-4<v0Dw c)o
-
m
T C O
tp ID d o n
O
Co V
AN
C O
Zz T
ON z
6 N�� d a v Q
� c
C
T 7 D 9 O
.Zl
TO
V 2
~
W C
O
d o
A
m D y
v
n o
z
n
rn
0
0
o n o
o
0
0
o
D
o
o
0
c
0
o
^
?
w
m T m
Fr�r
Nm C
O
O
a
O
o
O
O
O
Z m 2
o w O
o
O
0
0
0
O O O
s-
O
O A
A
m �
m D
mm
/�
T
71
n
m
n m
m
ITEM NUMBER:
3
DATE: 4-4-06
Atascadero Planning Commission
Staff Report - Community Development Department
Conditional Use Permit 2006-0177
Patria Circle Development
919 and 924 Patria Circle
(Mark Owens and Dennis Reed)
SUBJECT:
The proposed project is a request to amend the Master Plan of Development for the
Patria Circle Development to allow for enclosure of private patio areas. The project
was originally approved as a Planned Development in September 1989.
RECOMMENDATION:
If the Planning Commission believes the request meets the intent of the original
approved project:
Adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2006-0029 approving Conditional Use Permit
2006-0177 allowing enclosure of patio areas for 919 and 924 Patria Circle and requiring
a Minor Conditional Use Permit for future requests of additions within the Patria Circle
Development.
SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Owners: Mark Owens
919 Patria Court, Atascadero, CA 93422
Phone: 550-1246
Karen Reed
924 Patria Circle, Atascadero, CA 93422
Phone: 466-7183
2. Applicant: Dennis Reed
2455 Reyna Drive, Hayward, CA 94541
Phone: 510-581-3101
3. Project Address: 919 and 924 Patria Circle, APN 045-357-013 and 016
4. General Plan Designation: High Density Residential
5. Zoning District: Residential Multiple Family, 16 units/acre
6. Site Area: Approximately 5.36 acres
7. Existing Use: Residential
8. Environmental Status: Categorically Exempt, Category 1(e) (Existing
Facilities)
Background:
The subject site is located on the west side of EI Camino Real, east of the State
Hospital property. The west property line is adjacent to Highway 101.
Highway 101
I /
1® -
State Hospital
Property
Patria Court
Project Site
g;r'nia
-
I EI Camino Real I
The property is zoned high density residential with a Planned Development No. 7
Overlay, and was developed in the early 1990's as a mix of single-family and multi-
family pre -fabricated residential buildings on a total of 42 lots. The application was
originally approved by the City Council on August 14, 1990 as a mobile home
subdivision. After a series of amendments to the Master Plan of Development, the
project was re -approved to construct prefabricated, "stick built" homes. The footprints
are "U" shaped and are basically the same for all 42 units. Staff has reviewed the
original project file and notes that this existing residential development does not
conform to the PD -7 site development standards, i.e. setbacks, building coverage,
private open space, parking, and appearance review. Staff believes that the project
was mistakenly approved as a PD -7 when it should have been considered as an
independent planned development. As a result, staff is forwarding this application to the
Planning Commission as an amendment to the CUP (Master Plan of Development) to
allow modifications to the residential homes without triggering a complete Zone Change
application. Since the proposed project is adding a bedroom on one of the properties
with the possibility of similar proposals in the future, staff has focused analysis on the
impact of site coverage and residential/guest parking within this neighborhood
development.
Analysis
The project is a mix of two and three bedroom units. The two bedroom units are
approximately 1,000 square feet in size, not including the garage, and the three
bedroom units are 1,200 to 1,350 square feet.
A — Entry Court D — Dining G — Courtyard K — 3' high wall
B — Entry E — Kitchen H — Garage L — 6' high wall
C — Living Area F — Bedroom J — Covered Area M — Adjacent Unit
919 Patria Circle
The applicant at 919 Patria Circle is requesting to enclose 195 square feet in order to
provide a third bedroom. 919 Patria is Plan A — Two Bedroom as shown above on a at
919 3,482 square foot lot. Design standards for residential multi -family, 16 -units per
acre zoning allows for 50% maximum site coverage. The existing development equals
approximately 1,514 square feet or 43% site coverage. The addition of 195 square feet
would result in1,709 square feet or 49% site coverage.
Area of Enclosure
FAMM
�a
919 Patria Circle
urwrn., ••�•a••
The applicant at 924 Patria Circle is requesting to enclose 208 square feet in order to
provide additional living space. 924 Patria is Plan B — Three Bedroom as shown above,
on a 3,950 square foot lot. Design standards for residential multi -family, 16 -units per
acre zoning allows for 50% maximum site coverage. The existing development equals
approximately 1,739 square feet or 44% site coverage. The addition of 208 square feet
would result in 1,947 square feet or 49% site coverage.
A specific finding and condition of approval have been added to the draft resolution
acknowledging and limiting any proposed additions to a maximum of 50% site
coverage.
Parking
The majority of the properties have a 15-6" foot wide garage door and a 15-8" wide by
17 -foot long concrete driveway with a 30" concrete rolled curb in most locations. At the
time of original approval, it appears that the project was approved assuming the code
requirements for single-family development parking which requires two covered parking
spaces per dwelling with no guest parking requirements. Designated guest parking has
not been provided for this development. The interior street has been painted red in
some locations to prevent parking in these areas and it appears that there is available
parking on the interior street during the evening hours.
To date, residents have been able to park their vehicles with some overhang of the
curb, however staff is unaware of any neighborhood parking disputes. Since the
neighborhood has already been developed and the parking appears to function
adequately, the primary issue of allowing additional bedrooms to be developed which,
by code, requires additional parking. In an effort to address this issue, a specific finding
and a condition of approval have been added to the draft resolution acknowledging and
requiring that any property within the development that proposes a room addition as a
bedroom or which could function as a future bedroom, shall have a concrete paved area
in front of the garage of not less than 8 feet wide by 17 feet in length, to allow for
parking in the driveway.
Conditional Use Permit Findinqs
In order to approve the Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission is required to
make the following findings:
1. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan.
Staff Comment: The use is consistent with the HDR land use designation.
2. The proposed use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance.
Staff Comment: As conditioned, the project satisfies all zoning code provisions. A
condition of approval (Condition No. 9) has been added to insure that all future
requests for residential additions in this development comply with the Zoning
Ordinance's requirement limiting the maximum site coverage to 50%. In addition, all
future residential additions shall demonstrate there is a concrete paved area in front
of the garage of not less than 8 feet wide by 17 feet in length prior to submittal of a
Minor Conditional Use Permit application (Condition No. 10).
3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use should not,
because of the circumstances and conditions applied in this particular case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons residing
or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to the
property or improvements in the vicinity and the use.
Staff Comment: The existing residential facilities and the proposed additions should
not be detrimental to the general public or the working population's health, safety, or
welfare.
4. The proposed use will not be inconsistent with the character of the immediate
neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development.
Staff Comment: The proposed project will continue to meet the design standards of
the Residential Muli-Family-16 zoning district. The project will not be inconsistent
with the neighborhood character.
5. The proposed use will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe capacity of
all roads providing access to the project; either existing or to be improved in
conjunction with the project.
Staff Comment: As conditioned, the proposed project is not expected to generate
significant traffic. Implementation of the conditions of approval would allow the
Planning Commission to determine that this project and any future proposals will not
have a significant impact on parking issues on a case by case basis.
Environmental Determination
Categorical Exemption Class 1 (e): Additions to existing structures provided that the
addition will not result in an increase of more than: (1) 50 percent or the floor area or
the structures before the addition or 2,500 square feet, whichever is less.
A Notice of Exemption has been prepared for the project as identified in draft Planning
Commission Resolution 2006-0030.
CONCLUSION:
Staff analysis identifies the project as being approved and developed with inadequate
parking as compared to the current code requirements for residential multi -family
development. Approving additions could be utilized as bedroom space could create
additional on-site parking demand. If the Planning Commission decides to approve the
proposed project, this would allow additions to two of the existing units and would
establish the requirement for Minor Conditional Use Permit approval prior to approval of
additions for other units. Minor Conditional Use Permits would be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Commission and would provide the opportunity to review
additions on a project by project basis to ensure parking issues remain adequately
addressed before additions are constructed and allow an opportunity for public
notification and hearing.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. The Planning Commission may approve Conditional Use Permit 2006-0177 with
modified conditions of approval.
2. The Planning Commission may deny Conditional Use Permit 2006-0177 based
on appropriate findings. To deny the application, the Commission must find that
it is inconsistent with one of the required findings. The motion to deny must
include a finding for denial.
3. The Planning Commission may continue the application and refer the project
back to staff for additional information or analysis. Direction should be given to
staff and the applicant.
PREPARED BY: Kerry Margason, Associate Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1: Zoning and General Plan Designation
Attachment 2: Aerial Photo
Attachment 3: Draft Resolution PC 2006-0029
ATTACHMENT 1: Zoning and General Plan Designation
Zoning District: RMF -16
919 and 924 Patria Circle
APN 045-357-013 and 016 (1.3 acre portion)
low,
1. 51F
a�l
Aft-
ATTACHMENT 3: PC Resolution 2006-0029
DRAFT RESOLUTION PC 2006-0029
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2006-0177,
TO AMEND A MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT
AT 919 and 924 Patria Circle
(919 and 924 Patria Circle /Mark Owens and Dennis Reed)
WHEREAS, an application has been received from Mark Owens, 919 Patria Circle and
Dennis Reed, on behalf of Karen Reed, 924 Patria Circle, CA 93422 (Property Owners), and to
consider Conditional Use Permit 2006-0177, amending the Master Plan of Development for the
Patria Circle Development (APN 045-357-013 and 016); and,
WHEREAS, the proposed project is located within the High Density Residential land
use designation of the City of Atascadero's General Plan Land Use Diagram; and,
WHEREAS, the proposed project is located in the Residential Mult-Family -16 zoning
district; and,
WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption (Class 1) was prepared for the project in
accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the
proposed Conditional Use Permit application on April 4th, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. and considered
testimony and reports from staff, the applicants and the public.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission takes the following actions:
SECTION 1. Findings for approval of Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission
finds as follows:
1. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan; and,
2. As conditioned, the proposed project satisfies all applicable provisions of the
Zoning Ordinance; and,
3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not,
because of the circumstances and conditions applied in this particular case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious
to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use; and,
4. The proposed project will not be inconsistent with the character of the immediate
neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development; and,
5. The proposed project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe
capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be
improved in conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of
the surrounding neighborhood that would result from the full development in
accordance with the Land Use Element.
6. In accordance with Zoning Ordinance Requirements for the RMF -16 zoning
district, all future addition requests shall be limited to a maximum of 50% site
coverage.
7. All future addition requests shall demonstrate an existing concrete paved area in
front of the garage of not less than 8 feet wide by 17 feet in length.
SECTION 2. Approval of Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission does hereby
approve Conditional Use Permit 2006-0177 allowing for residential additions to 919 and 924
Patria Court and establishing the requirement for Minor Conditional Use Permit approval for any
future residential additions in the Patria Court development (APN 045-357-013 and 016)
consistent with the following Exhibits:
EXHIBIT A:
Notice of Exemption
EXHIBIT B:
Conditions of Approval
EXHIBIT C:
Addition — 919 Patria Circle
EXHIBIT D:
Addition — 924 Patria Circle
On motion by Commissioner , and seconded by the foregoing
resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote:
AYES: ( )
NOES: ( )
ABSENT: ( )
ABSTAIN: ( )
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA
Ellen Beraud
Planning Commission Chairperson
Attest:
Warren M. Frace
Planning Commission Secretary
EXHIBIT A: Notice of Exemption / CUP 2006-0177
Draft Resolution PC 2006-0029
CITY OF ATASCADERO
NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
6907 El Camino Real Atascadero, CA 93422 805.461.5000
TO: File Date Received for Filing
FROM: City of Atascadero
Community Development Department
6907 El Camino Real
Atascadero, CA 93422
SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in Compliance with Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code
Proiect Title: Patria circle development
Proiect Location (Include County):
919 and 924 Patria Circle, Atascadero, CA 93422 (San Luis Obispo County)
Proiect Description: Amendment to master plan of development for patria circle
development allowing for enclosure of patio area to 919 and 924 Patria Circle and
establishing requirement for minor conditional use permit approval for all future addition
requests.
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City ofAtascadero
Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project:
Mark Owens, 919 Patria Circle, Atascadero, CA 93422
Dennis Reed for Karen Reed, 2455 Reyna Drive, Hayward, CA 94541
Exempt Status:
❑ Ministerial (Sec. 21080 (b)(1); 15268)
❑ Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a))
❑ Emergency Project (Sec.21080 (b)(4); 15269(b)(c))
® Categorical Exemption (Sec. 15301, Existing Facilities)
Reasons why project is exempt: Class 1(e) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Section 15301,
Existing Facilities) exempts additions to existing dwellings of less than 50% of the existing floor area when the
project is served by public services.
Date: March 8, 2006
Kerry Margason
Associate Planner
Contact Person: Kerry Margason, Associate Planner, City of Atascadero (805) 461-5000
EXHIBIT B: Conditions of Approval
Draft Resolution PC 2006-0018
CUP 2006-0177
Conditions of Approval
Timing
Responsibility
Mitigation
CUP 2006-0177
/Monitoring
Measure
PS: Planning Services
Patria Circle Development
P
BL: Business License
GP: Grading Permit
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
BP: Building Permit
PD: Police Department
FI: Final Inspection
CE: City Engineer
Mark Owens and Dennis Reed
TO: Temporary Occupancy
WW: Wastewater
F0: Final Occupancy
CA: City Attorney
Standard Conditions
1. The approval of this use permit shall become final and
BP
PS
effective for the purposes of issuing building permits,
provided the required conditions of approval have been
satisfied, fourteen (14) days following the Planning
Commission approval unless prior to the time, an
appeal to the decision is filed as set forth in Section 9-
1.111(b) of the Zoning Ordinance.
2. Approval of this Conditional Use Permit shall run with
BP
PS
the land and shall be in full force and effect for the
Patria Circle development.
3. The granting of this Conditional Use Permit shall apply
ongoing
PS
to the Patria Circle development as shown on Tract
2061, filed for record in Book 16, at Page 81 of Maps, in
the Office of the County Recorder, County of San Luis
Obispo, State of California.
4. The Community Development Department shall have
BP
PS
the authority to approve minor changes to the project
that (1) result in a superior site design or appearance,
and/or (3) address a construction design issue that is
not substantive to the Conditional Use Permit.
5. This Conditional Use Permit is for addition of 195
Ongoing
PS
square feet to 919 Patria Circle and addition of 208
square feet to 924 Patria Circle and to establish
requirements for Minor Conditional Use Permit approval
for all future residential addition requests.
Project Conditions
6. All future additions to any unit within said Tract 2061
Ongoing
PS, BS
shall first receive review and approval of the Atascadero
Planning Commission through the Minor Conditional
Use permit application process.
7. All conditions of CUP 05-89 remain in full force and
Ongoing
PS, BS
effect, except as herein amended.
8. All construction activities shall comply with the City of
BP/FO
PS, BS
Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours of operation.
Excessively loud noise shall be prohibited and shall be
subject to CUP reconsideration of operations and use
Conditions of Approval
Timing
Responsibility
Mitigation
CUP 2006-0177
/Monitoring
Measure
PS: Planning Services
Patric Circle Development
P
BL: Business License
GP: Grading Permit
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
BP: Building Permit
PD: Police Department
FI: Final Inspection
CE: City Engineer
Mark Owens and Dennis Reed
TO: Temporary Occupancy
WW: Wastewater
F0: Final Occupancy
CA: City Attorney
by the Planning Commission.
9. Site coverage shall not exceed 50%.
BP
PS
10. Prior to submittal of minor conditional use permits for
BP
PS
any future residential additions, the applicant shall
demonstrate that the existing driveway for the unit in
question includes a minimum dimension of 8 feet wide
by 17 feet long, not including rolled curb.
If the existing driveway does not meet this requirement,
the minor conditional use permit application shall not be
accepted for processing and the request for residential
addition shall be denied.
EXHIBIT C: Addition to 919 Patria Court
PATRIACR.
go
AW
• _LL,LLL
S •
S LY
l` tW1 i�, a� tOy� kAgl •. ��
Ilk
1 raa
�W1�
Kim—
No'
Addition Area
1 d 1 som
EXHIBIT D: Addition to 924 Patria Circle
ITEM NUMBER: 4
DATE: 4-4-06
Atascadero Planning Commission
Staff Report - Community Development Department
Reconsideration of
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 2003-0040
5516 Tunitas Avenue
(Maverick Construction/Linda Kennedy)
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt draft Resolution PC 2006-0030
approving reconsideration of Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 2003-0040 (AT 03-0108)
subject to findings and conditions.
REPORT- IN - BRIEF:
The proposed project consists of an application to reconsider and approve a vesting
Tentative Parcel Map 2003-0040 (AT 03-0108) which expired on October 28, 2005
during a change of ownership for the subject property. This parcel map was originally
approved in conjunction with Zone Change 2003-0045 and Conditional Use Permit
(CUP 2003-0094) establishing a Planned Development No. 7 overlay on the site subject
to a Master Plan of Development (CUP) that allows for three (3) new single-family
residences to be constructed in addition to the one (1) existing single-family colony
house. The vesting Tentative Parcel Map would create a four (4) lot subdivision. The
project includes retention of an existing single-family residence.
Situation and Facts:
1. Applicant / Representative: Linda Kennedy, Maverick Construction, P.O. Box 4247,
Paso Robles, CA 93447, Phone: 239-0134
2. Project Address: 5516 Tunitas Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422
(San Luis Obispo County) APN 029-081-003
3. General Plan Designation: General Plan Designation: Medium -Density Residential
(10 units/acre)
4. Zoning District: RMF -10 (Residential Multiple Family)
ITEM NUMBER: 4
DATE: 4-4-06
5. Site Area: 0.59 acre
6. Existing Use: Single Family Residence
7. Environmental Status: Consistent with Certified Mitigated Negative Declaration
2003-0034 (Certified by City Council on October 28,
2003)
DISCUSSION:
Background: On September 16, 2003, the Planning Commission reviewed this project
and recommended that the City Council approve the project as conditioned. The
Commission recommended project approval on a 7-0 vote.
The City Council reviewed and approved the project on October 28, 2003. The
Subdivision Map Act allows for two -years to either final the vesting tentative parcel map
or request a time extension.
The applicants were almost finished with the process to final the map when the property
changed ownership and time ran out.
The Zone Change and Conditional Use Permit are still in effect and the property is
currently under construction according to the Master Plan of Development.
Project Definition: The proposed project consists of three new single-family homes and
retention of one existing single-family home located on individual lots that will be
developed under the requirements of the PD -7 overlay district within the RMF -10
(Residential Multi -Family) zoning district.
Affordable Housing: At the time of original approval of this tentative map, the City
Council had implemented an interim inclusionary affordable housing program to include
a fixed percentage of units within residential developments that require a legislative
approval to be reserved as deed restricted affordable units or contribute to in -lieu fees
for future projects. This interim program allowed the project applicant a choice of either
setting aside one housing unit at the moderate rate for a period of 30 years, or paying
an in -lieu fee based on 2.50% of the construction valuation of each of the market rate
units.
In November 2005, the City Council amended the interim inclusionary program to
require an in -lieu fee of 5% of the construction valuation of each of the market rate
units. Staff is recommending that condition no. 9 of the Tentative Parcel Map be
modified with this approval to reflect the change in the in -lieu fee rate.
ITEM NUMBER: 4
DATE: 4-4-06
Tentative Parcel Map: A four -lot parcel map is proposed as part of the project
consistent with the Master Plan of Development. The parcel map has been conditioned
by staff to meet all City standards including street frontage improvements. The
applicant will be required to record CC&R's for the map that will include maintenance
and access of common areas (Condition TPM 11).
Proposed Environmental Determination: The proposed project is consistent with the
Certified Mitigated Negative Declaration and all mitigation measures.
Conclusion: The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and Atascadero
Municipal Code, as analyzed within this staff report.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. The Commission may make modifications to the project and/or conditions of
approval for the project.
2. The Commission may determine more information is needed on some aspect of
the project and may refer the item back to the applicant and staff to develop the
additional information. The Council should clearly state the type of information
required and move to continue the item to a future date.
3. The Commission may deny the project. The parcel would retain its designation
of Residential Multi -Family. The Council should specify the reasons for denial of
the project and make an associated finding with such action.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1: Location Map, Zoning and General Plan
Attachment 2 Planning Commission and City Council Meeting Minutes
Attachment 3 Draft Resolution A - Proposed Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
ITEM NUMBER
DATE: 4-4-06
Attachment 1: Location Map, General Plan and Zoning
Attachment 2 - Planning Commission Minutes of 9/16/03 and City Council Minutes of
10/28/03
Minutes of the September 16, 2003 Planning Commission hearing can be located at
www.atascadero.org. Choose the Planning Commission link and then the meeting link. Once in
the meeting area, click on the downward pointing arrow next to the "All Dates" box, scroll down
and choose the date. The Planning Commission recommended this project to the City Council
on a 7-0 vote.
Minutes of the October 28, 2003 City Council hearing can be located at www.atascadero.org.
Choose the City Council link and then the meeting link. Once in the meeting area, click on the
downward pointing arrow next to the "All Dates" box, scroll down and choose the date. The
City Council approved this project on a 5-0 vote.
ATTACHMENT 3: Draft Resolution PC 2006-0030
DRAFT PC RESOLUTION 2006-0030
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO APPROVING THE RECONSIDERATION OF
VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2003-0040 (AT 03-0108)
A FOUR -LOT MAP CONSISTENT WITH
A PD -7 OVERLAY ZONE OF APN 029-081-003
(5516 Tunitas Avenue / Kennedy)
WHEREAS, an application has been received from Maverick Construction, Linda
Kennedy (P.O. Box 4247, Paso Robles, CA 93447) Applicant and Property Owner to reconsider
and reinstate a four lot residential Vesting Tentative Parcel Map on APN 029-081-003 and,
WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is MDR (Medium -Density Residential);
and,
WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is RMF -10 (Residential Multi -Family) with
a PD 7 Overlay; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed
Public Hearing held on September 16, 2003, studied and considered Tentative Parcel Map 2003-
0040, after first studying and considering the Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared
for the project; and,
WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a Public Hearing held on October 28, 2003,
studied and considered Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 2003-0040, after first studying and
considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project; and,
WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a Public Hearing held on October 28, 2003,
certified the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approved the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
2003-0040; and
WHEREAS, during the application process to have the Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
recorded, the property did change ownership and the tentative parcel map expired.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of
Atascadero:
SECTION 1. Findings of Approval for Vesting Tentative Parcel Map:
1. The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the General Plan and
applicable zoning requirements.
2. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the
General Plan and applicable zoning requirements.
3. The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the proposed Planned
Development Overlay District #7 Master Plan of Development (CUP 2003-0094).
4. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed.
5. The site is physically suitable for the density of development proposed.
6. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision will not cause substantial
environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish and wildlife or
their habitat.
7. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public
at large for access through, or the use of property within, the proposed subdivision; or
substantially equivalent alternative easements are provided.
8. The applicants will provide a deed restriction on the colony house located on Parcel D
which will prevent the site from being further subdivided or from being altered in any
manner which would result in the degradation of the house's historical significance.
9. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be required that incorporate
the planned development conditions of approval to ensure that the site retains the
historic qualities (historic buildings, architecture, colors, materials, street amenities,
fencing, and landscaping) over time
10. The proposed subdivision design and type of improvements proposed will not be
detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public.
11. The Required 45 -foot lot width for Parcel 4 (Unit C) is achieved with a 4 -foot jog in
the property line to preserve the open front yard historic setting.
12. The Standard guest parking space for Parcel 3 (Unit D) is not provided to preserve the
historic site setting.
SECTION 2. Approval. The Atascadero Planning Commission in a regular session assembled
on April 4, 2006, resolves to approve the reconsideration of Vesting Tentative Parcel Map (TPM
2003-0040) subject to the following:
1. Exhibit A: Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 2003-0040
2. Exhibit B: Conditions of Approval / Mitigation Monitoring Program.
On motion by Commissioner , and seconded by Commissioner
the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following
roll call vote:
AYES: ( )
NOES: ( )
ABSTAIN: ( )
ABSENT: ( )
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA
Ellen Beraud
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Warren Frace
Planning Commission Secretary
Exhibit A: Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 2003-0040
cg c aid t 1
s 3 $ s10 CO
" �!
b d '4t
06
ii s e
m �
r
f
ff` 7,f -
a
®I
.0
1 a S O
®I
Exhibit B: Conditions Of Approval / Mitigation Monitoring Program
Conditions of Approval /
Timing
Responsibility
Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program
/Monitoring
Measure
GP: Grading Permit
PS: Planning Services
5516 Tunitas Avenue
BP: Building Permit
SIP: Subdivision
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
Tentative Parcel Map
ImprovementPVesting
FM: Final Map
PD: Police Department
CE:
CE: City Engineer
TPM 2003-0040
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
F0: Final Occupancy
AMWC: Water Comp.
Planning Services
1. The approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall become
FM
PS
final and effective following approval of Zone Change
2003-0040 and CUP 2003-0094.
2. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall be valid for
FM
PS
two years after its effective date. At the end of the period,
the approval shall expire and become null and void unless
an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written
request received prior to the expiration date.
3. The Community Development Department shall have the
FM
PS
authority to approve minor changes to the project that (1)
result in a superior site design or appearance, and/or (2)
address a design issue that is not substantive to the
Tentative Tract Map and that the Final Map is in
substantial conformance with the Tentative Map.
4. The Parcel Map shall be subject to additional fees for park
FM
PS
or recreation purposes (QUIMBY Act) as required by City
Ordinance.
5. The applicant shall record CC&R's for the subdivision
FM
PS
subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer,
City Attorney and Planning Services. The CC&R's shall
identify the maintenance responsibilities of all private
driveways, sewer facilities, drainage facilities, common
parking areas, site lighting, landscape areas, fencing, and
other common facilities. The CC&R's shall also state that
all exterior colors, exterior materials, yard fencing and site
landscaping shall be consistent with the overall master
plan of development.
6. The granting of this entitlement shall apply to the property
On going
PS
located at 5516 Tunitas Avenue (APN 029-081-003)
regardless of owner.
7. The Final Map shall be drawn in substantial conformance
FM
PS
with the approved tentative map, and in compliance with
all conditions set forth herein, shall be submitted for
review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision
Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance.
8. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless
FM
PS
the City of Atascadero or its agents, officers, and
Conditions of Approval /
Timing
Responsibility
Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program
/Monitoring
Measure
GP: Grading Permit
PS: Planning Services
5516 Tunitas Avenue
BP: Building Permit
SIP: Subdivision
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
Improvement Plans
FM: Final Map
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
TPM 2003-0040
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
FO: Final Occupancy
AMWC: Water Comp.
employees against any claim or action brought to
challenge an approval by the city, or any of its entities,
concerning the subdivision.
9. Affordable Housing Requirement: The applicant shall
FM
PS, CE
either set aside one housing unit at the moderate category
rate for a period of 30 years, or pay an in-lieu fee based
on 2.50 5% of the valuation of each of the market rate
units.
10. The colony house lot shall include a deed restriction
GP
PS, CE
preventing the site from being subdivided or from being
altered, which degrades the historic significance of the
property.
11. The applicant will be required to record CC&R's for the
FM
PS, CE
map that will include maintenance and access of
common areas.
Building Services
12. A soils investigation prepared by a licensed
FM
PS, BS, CE
Geotechnical Engineer is to be provided for the project.
The report is to be provided at the time of building
permit submittal along with the building plans for review
by the Building Division. Recommendations contained
in the report are to be incorporated into the project
plans.
Fire Marshal
13. Driveway to be paved with decorative pavers. Final
FM
PS, CE
paver selection to compliment historic colony house,
subject to staff approval.
14. Show location of existing and any proposed fire
FM
CE
hydrants.
15. Provide a letter from the Atascadero Mutual Water
FM
CE
Company stating the minimum expected water available
to the site. Amount available must meet minimum
requirement specified in the California Fire Code.
16. Note that approved address signage is to be provided.
FM
CE
17. Note on plans that fire lanes shall be delineated to
FM
CE
restrict parking as required by the Fire Authority.
City Engineer Standard Conditions
18. In the event that the applicant is allowed to bond for the
BP
BS
public improvements required as a condition of this
map, the applicant shall enter into a Subdivision
Improvement Agreement with the Planning
Commission.
Conditions of Approval /
Timing
Responsibility
Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program
/Monitoring
Measure
GP: Grading Permit
PS: Planning Services
5516 Tunitas Avenue
BP: Building Permit
SIP: Subdivision
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
Improvement Plans
FM: Final Map
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
TPM 2003-0040
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
FO: Final Occupancy
AMWC: Water Comp.
19. An engineer's estimate of probable cost shall be
BP
PW
submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer
to determine the amount of the bond.
20. The Subdivision Improvement Agreement shall record
BP
PW
concurrently with the Final Map.
21. All public improvements shall be constructed in
BP
PW
conformance with the City of Atascadero Engineering
Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or
as directed by the City Engineer.
22. The applicant shall enter into a Plan Check/Inspection
BP
BS
agreement with the City.
23. The applicant shall be responsible for the relocation
BP
PW
and/or alteration of existing utilities.
24. The applicant shall install all new utilities (water, gas,
BP
BS
electric, cable TV and telephone) underground. Utilities
shall be extended to the property line frontage of each
lot or its public utility easement.
25. The applicant shall monument all property corners for
BP
PW
construction control and shall promptly replace them if
disturbed.
26. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted
BP
PW
for review in conjunction with the processing of the
parcel map.
27. All existing and proposed utility, pipeline, open space,
BP
PS/PW
or other easements are to be shown on the parcel map.
If there are building or other restrictions related to the
easements, they shall be noted on the parcel map. The
applicant shall show all access restrictions on the parcel
map.
28. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall
BP
PS/PW
submit a map drawn in substantial conformance with
the approved tentative map and in compliance with all
conditions the City in accordance with the Subdivision
Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance forth
herein shall submit set for review and approval.
29. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant's
BP
PW
surveyor shall set monuments at all new property
corners or shall indicate, by certificate on the final map,
that corners have been set or shall be set by a date
specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the
survey to be retraced.
Conditions of Approval /
Timing
Responsibility
Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program
/Monitoring
Measure
GP: Grading Permit
PS: Planning Services
5516 Tunitas Avenue
BP: Building Permit
SIP: Subdivision
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
Improvement Plans
FM: Final Map
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
TPM 2003-0040
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
FO: Final Occupancy
AMWC: Water Comp.
30. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall
BP
BS
pay all outstanding plan check/inspection fees.
31. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall
BP
PW
have the map reviewed by all applicable public and
private utility companies (cable, telephone, gas, electric,
Atascadero Mutual Water Company). The applicant
shall obtain a letter from each utility company, which
indicates their review of the map. The letter shall
identify any new easements, which may be required by
the utility company. A copy of the letter shall be
submitted to the City. New easements shall be shown
on the parcel map.
32. Upon recording the final map, the applicant shall
BP
PW
provide the City with a black line clear Mylar (0.4 mil)
copy and a blue line print of the recorded map.
33. Prior to the final inspection of any public improvements,
BP
PW
the applicant shall submit a written statement from a
registered civil engineer that all work has been
completed and is in full compliance with the approved
plans.
City Engineer - Site Specific Conditions
34. The applicant shall construct new curb and gutter, in
BP
PS/PW
accordance with City Standards, as shown on
improvement plans, along entire frontage.
35. The applicant shall saw cut and remove existing asphalt
BP
PW
concrete roadway as shown on plans and repave to
new curb and gutter, in accordance with City Standards.
36. The applicant shall address storm water detention prior
BP
PW
to grading and drainage approval.
37. The applicant shall pay sewer Extension (Annexation)
BP
PW
and Connection fees upon issuance of building permit.
38. Each building shall be individually connected to the
BP
PW
public sewer via a 4" gravity lateral to which each
individual 2" force main will be connected.
39. Building plans shall be include detail of sewage sumps
BP
BS
and pumps, control panel and alarm systems.
Atascadero Mutual Water Company
40. Prior to the recordation of the Final Parcel Map, the
BP
BS
applicant shall submit plans showing the water
distribution facilities required to serve the project for
Conditions of Approval /
Timing
Responsibility
Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program
/Monitoring
Measure
GP: Grading Permit
PS: Planning Services
5516 Tunitas Avenue
BP: Building Permit
SIP: Subdivision
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
Improvement Plans
FM: Final Map
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
TPM 2003-0040
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
FO: Final Occupancy
AMWC: Water Comp.
review and approval by the Atascadero Mutual Water
Company. All new water distribution facilities shall be
constructed in conformance with Atascadero Mutual
Water Company Standards.
41. Prior to the recordation of the Final Map, the applicant
BP
BS
shall obtain a " Will Serve " letter from the Atascadero
Mutual Water Company.
42. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall
BP
BS
pay all installation and connection fees required by the
Atascadero Mutual Water Company.
43. Show all fire suppression appurtenances required by
BP
BS
the Atascadero Fire Department.
44. Prior to the recordation of the Final Parcel Map, the
BP
BS
applicant shall submit plans showing the water
distribution facilities required to serve the project for
review and approval by the Atascadero Mutual Water
Company. All new water distribution facilities shall be
constructed in conformance with Atascadero Mutual
Water Company Standards.
45. A 5 -foot drainage easement shall be recorded on the
BP
PW
final map along the south property line of Parcel A and
Parcel B and the east property line of Parcel B.
46. Existing drainage patterns from adjacent properties
BP
PW
shall not be obstructed.
47. All drainage from improvements shall cross property
BP
PW
lines within drainage easements.
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure 1.c.1: If exterior lighting is proposed, it
BP
PS
1.c.1
shall be designed to eliminate any off site glare. All exterior
site lights shall utilize full cut-off, "hooded" lighting fixtures to
prevent offsite light spillage and glare. Any luminaire pole
height shall not exceed 16 -feet in height, limit intensity to 2.0
foot candles at ingress/egress, and otherwise 0.6 foot candle
minimum to 1.0 maximum within the private street. Fixtures
shall be shield cut-off type and compatible with historic setting,
subject to staff approval.
Mitigation Measure 3.b.1: The project shall be conditioned to
BP
BS
3.b.1
comply with all applicable District regulations pertaining to the
control of fugitive dust (PM -10) as contained in sections 6.3,
6.4 and 6.5 of the April 2003 Air Quality Handbook.
Section 6.3: Construction Equipment
• Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune
according to manufacturer's specifications.
• Fuel all off-road and portable diesel powered
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
5516 Tunitas Avenue
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
TPM 2003-0040
Timing
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
SIP: Subdivision
Improvement Plans
FM: Final Map
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
AMWC: Water Comp.
Mitigation
Measure
equipment, including but not limited to bulldozers,
graders, cranes, loaders, scrapers, backhoes,
generator sets, compressors, auxiliary power units,
with ARB certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (Non -
taxed version suitable for use off-road).
• Maximize to the extent feasible, the use of diesel
construction equipment meeting the ARB's 1996 or
newer certification standard for off-road heavy-duty
diesel engines.
• Install diesel oxidation catalysts (DOC), catalyzed
diesels particulate filters (CDPF) or other District
approved emission reduction retrofit services
(Required for projects grading more than 4.0 acres of
continuously worked area).
Section 6.4: Activity Management Techniques
• Develop a comprehensive construction activity
management plan designed to minimize the amount
of large construction equipment operating during any
given time period.
• Schedule of construction truck trips during non -peak
hours to reduce peak hour emissions.
• Limit the length of the construction workday period, if
necessary.
• Phase construction activities, if appropriate.
Section 6.5: Fugitive PM10
All of the following measures shall be included on grading,
demolition and building plan notes:
A. Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible.
B. Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient
quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site.
Increased watering frequency would be required
whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non -
potable) water should be used whenever possible.
C. All dirt stockpile areas should be sprayed daily as needed.
D. Permanent dust control measures identified in the
approved project re -vegetation and landscape plans
should be implemented as soon as possible following
completion of any soil disturbing activities.
E. Exposed ground areas that are plann4ed to be reworked
at dates greater than one month after initial grading should
be sown with a fast -germinating native grass seed and
watered until vegetation is established.
F. All disturbed soil areas not subject to re -vegetation should
be stabilized using approved chemical soil binder, jute
netting, or other methods approved in advance by the
APCD.
G. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc, to be paved
should be complete as soon as possible. In addition,
building pads should be laid as soon as possible after
Conditions of Approval /
Timing
Responsibility
Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program
/Monitoring
Measure
GP: Grading Permit
PS: Planning Services
5516 Tunitas Avenue
BP: Building Permit
SIP: Subdivision
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
Improvement Plans
FM: Final Map
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
TPM 2003-0040
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
FO: Final Occupancy
AMWC: Water Comp.
grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.
H. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not
exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the
construction site.
I. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials
are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of
freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load
and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114.
J. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit
unpaved roads onto streets, or was off trucks and
equipment leaving the site.
K. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil
material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water
sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where
feasible.
L. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or
persons to monitor the dust control program and to order
increased watering, as necessary, to prevent transport of
dust off site. The name and telephone number of such
persons shall be provided to the APCD prior to land use
clearance for map recordation and land use clearance for
finish grading of any structure.
Mitigation Measure 4.e.1: The building permit site plan shall
GP
BS
4.e.1
identify all protection and enhancement measures
recommended by the Certified Arborist in the Tree Protection
Plan. Tree protection fencing shall be installed at the locations
called out in the Tree Protection Plan.
Mitigation Measure 4.e.2: The developer shall contract with a
GP
BS
4.e.2
certified arborist during all phases of project implementation.
The certified arborists shall be responsible for monitoring the
project during all phases of construction through project
completion, as follows:
(a). A written agreement between the arborist and the
developer outlining a arborist monitoring schedule for
each construction phase through final inspection shall be
submitted to and approved by planning staff prior to the
issuance of building/grading permits.
(b). Arborist shall schedule a pre -construction meeting with
engineering /planning staff, grading equipment operators,
project superintendent to review the project conditions and
requirements prior to any grubbing or earth work for any
portion of the project site. All tree protection fencing and
trunk protection shall be installed for inspection during the
meeting. Tree protection fencing shall be installed at the
line of encroachment into the tree's root zone area.
(c). As specified by the arborist report and City staff:
■ Prune all trees to be saved for structural strength and
crown cleaning by a licensed and certified arborist;
Conditions of Approval /
Timing
Responsibility
Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program
/Monitoring
Measure
GP: Grading Permit
PS: Planning Services
5516 Tunitas Avenue
BP: Building Permit
SIP: Subdivision
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
Improvement Plans
FM: Final Map
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
TPM 2003-0040
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
FO: Final Occupancy
AMWC: Water Comp.
■ Remove all debris and spoils from the lot cleaning
and tree pruning.
■ All trenching or grading within the protected root zone
area, outside of the tree protection fence shall require
hand trenching or preserve and protect roots that are
larger than 2 inches in diameter.
■ No grading or trenching is allowed within the fenced
protected area.
■ Any roots that are 4 inches in diameter or larger are
not to be cut until inspected and approved by the on-
site arborist.
■ Apply any additional recommendations of the project
arborist.
(d). Upon project completion and prior to final occupancy a
final status report shall be prepared by the project arborist
certifying that the tree protection plan was implemented,
the trees designated for protection were protected during
construction, and the construction -related tree protection
measures are no longer required for tree protection.
Mitigation Measure 4.e.3: Project manager should be
GP
BS
4.e.3
responsible for instructing workers about tree protection goals,
implementing protection of root zones, and installing and
maintaining protective fencing.
Mitigation Measure 4.e.4: Protective fencing is required
GP
BS
4.e.4
between all construction activities and native trees. The
fencing shall consist of five-foot tall orange plastic, with steel t -
posts sunk into the ground, eight feet apart. The fencing shall
be installed prior to any site disturbance or construction, and
shall remain in place until all construction is complete.
Mitigation Measure 4.e.5: No grading, trenching, materials
GP
BS
4.e.5
storage, soil storage, debris, or site disturbance shall occur
within the protected area. No concrete, plaster, or paint
washout shall be allowed within the tree protection zone.
Mitigation Measure 4.e.6: Excavation for buildings A and B
GP
BS
4.e.6
shall employ techniques that minimize the amount of soil
removed. Vertical cuts are preferred. Any back cuts greater
than six feet from the north wall of building A and west wall of
building B, shall be supported with shoring.
Excavation for the west side of building B, the north side of
building A, shall be done using special procedures for the
upper three feet of soil, to avoid tearing of roots. Heavy
equipment may be used to remove soil to within two feet of the
anticipated edge of cut. Then roots will be uncovered by hand,
and cut cleanly with a sharp hand saw at the lie of finish cut.
This will avoid tearing of roots. The soil may then be removed,
using heavy equipment. Below three feet depth, heavy
equipment may be used for the entire excavation.
Construction of sidewalk and steps from Rosario Avenue to
buildings A and B shall minimize excavation to less than four
Conditions of Approval /
Timing
Responsibility
Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program
/Monitoring
Measure
GP: Grading Permit
PS: Planning Services
5516 Tunitas Avenue
BP: Building Permit
SIP: Subdivision
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
Improvement Plans
FM: Final Map
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
TPM 2003-0040
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
FO: Final Occupancy
AMWC: Water Comp.
inches of cut or fill below the walk.
Mitigation Measure 4.e.7: If living roots two inches in diameter
GP
BS
4.e.7
or more are encountered during trenching or excavation, they
shall be cleanly cut by the contractor, with a sharp handsaw, to
remove the frayed end. Do no paint the cut ends of roots.
Keep the roots moist by covering the excavation edge with
plastic sheeting. Backfill the excavation as soon as possible.
Mitigation Measure 4.e.8: Excavation for the west side of
GP
BS
4.e.8
garage D will be by hand in all areas within fifteen feet of the
trunk of tree #1. Any large roots encountered will be
preserved, and the foundation will span over the root.
Cushioning for the root shall be blocks of Styrofoam, four
inches thick, over the top and sides of the root.
Mitigation Measure 4.e.9: Tree pruning should be done by a
GP
BS
4.e.9
qualified ISA certified arborist or ISA tree worker. A.N.S.I. A-
300 and Z-133 standards for tree care and the City Of
Atascadero Tree Ordinance shall be used and followed at all
times.
Mitigation Measure 5.a.1: The proposed project shall
GP
PS, BS, CE
5.a.1
incorporate the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and
Illustrated Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings. The
standards shall apply to the exterior rehabilitation of the
Colony house, construction of the new detached garage for the
colony house, design of the proposed three homes, and
proposed landscape improvements to the overall project site,
subject to staff review and approval.
Mitigation Measure 5.a.2: Replacement of any exterior
GP
PS, BS, CE
5.a.2
materials or design features on the original colony homes shall
be consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and
Illustrated Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings. This
shall include the replacements of any doors and windows with
solid wood framing of similar design and appearance. Vinyl,
vinyl -cladding, and metal materials are not permitted.
Mitigation Measure 5.a.3: The proposed project shall include
GP
PS, BS, CE
5.a.3
Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) or
equivalent mechanism that incorporate the planned
development conditions of approval to ensure that the site
retains the historic qualities (historic buildings, architecture,
colors, materials, fencing, and landscaping) over time.
Mitigation Measure 5.b.1: Should any cultural resources be
GP
PS, BS, CE
5.b.1
unearthed during site development work, the provisions of
CEQA -Section 15064.5, will be followed to reduce impacts to
a non-significant level.
Conditions of Approval /
Timing
Responsibility
Mitigation
Mitigation Monitoring Program
/Monitoring
Measure
GP: Grading Permit
PS: Planning Services
5516 Tunitas Avenue
BP: Building Permit
SIP: Subdivision
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
Improvement Plans
FM: Final Map
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
TPM 2003-0040
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
FO: Final Occupancy
AMWC: Water Comp.
Mitigation Measure 6.15.1: The grading permit application plans
GP, BP
PS, BS, CE
6.b.1
shall include erosion control measures to prevent soil, dirt, and
debris from entering the storm drain system during and after
construction. A separate plan shall be submitted for this
purpose and shall be subject to review and approval of the City
Engineer at the time of Building Permit application.
Mitigation Measure 6.b.2: All cut and fill slopes shall be hydro
GP, BP
PS, BS, CE
6.b.2
seeded with an appropriate erosion control method (erosion
control blanket, hydro-mulch, or straw mulch appropriately
anchored) immediately after completion of earthwork between
the months of October 15 through April 15. All disturbed
slopes shall have appropriate erosion control methods in
place. Duration of the project: The contractor will be
responsible for the clean up of any mud or debris that is
tracked onto public streets by construction vehicles.
Mitigation Measure 6.c.d: A soils report shall be required to be
GP, BP
PS, BS, CE
6.c.d.1
submitted with a future building permit by the building
department. The building plans will be required to follow the
recommendations of the soils report to assure safety for
residents and buildings.
Mitigation Measure 6.d.1: All recommendations contained
GP, BP
PS, BS, CE
6.d.1
within the project geotechnical investigation by GSI dated
2/27/03 shall be incorporated into the building plans and
adhered to during construction through project completion.
Mitigation Measure 8e.f.1: A Storm Water Pollution Prevention
BP
PS, BS ,CE
8.0.1
Plan (SWPPP)/Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted and
approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the
building permit. The plan shall include storm water measures
for the operation and maintenance of the project for the review
and approval of the City Engineer. The Building Permit
application plans shall identify Best Management Practices
(BMPs) appropriate to the uses conducted on site that
effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants into storm water
runoff.
Mitigation Measure 8.e.f.2: The developer is responsible for
BP
PS, BS, CE
8.e.f.2
ensuring that all contractors are aware of all storm water
quality measures and that such measures are implemented.
Failure to comply with the approved construction Best
Management Practices will result in the issuance of correction
notices, citations, or stop orders.
Conditions of Approval /
Mitigation Monitoring Program
5516 Tunitas Avenue
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
TPM 2003-0040
Timing
GP: Grading Permit
BP: Building Permit
SIP: Subdivision
Improvement Plans
FM: Final Map
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FI: Final inspection
FO: Final Occupancy
Responsibility
/Monitoring
PS: Planning Services
BS: Building Services
FD: Fire Department
PD: Police Department
CE: City Engineer
WW: Wastewater
CA: City Attorney
AMWC: Water Comp.
Mitigation
Measure
Mitigation Measure 11.d.1: All construction activities shall
GP, BP
PS, BS, CE
11.d.1
comply with the City of Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours
of operation.
Construction activities shall be limited to the following hours of
operation:
7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday
• 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Saturday
• No construction on Sunday
Further, particularly loud noises shall not occur before 8 a.m.
on weekdays and not at all on weekends.
The Community Development Director upon a determination
that unusually loud construction activities are having a
significant impact on the neighbors may modify the hours of
construction.
Failure to comply with the above-described hours of operation
may result in withholding of inspections and possible
construction prohibitions, subject to the review and approval of
the Community Development Director.
A sign shall be posted on-site with the hours of operation and
a telephone number of the person to be contacted in the event
of any violations. Staff shall approve the details of such a sign
during the Grading Plan/Building Permit review process.