The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPC_2007-06-05_AgendaPacketCITY OF ATASCADERO PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Regular Meeting Tuesday, June 5, 2007 — 7:00 P.M. City Hall Council Chambers 6907 El Camino Real Atascadero, California CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Chairperson O'Keefe Vice Chairperson Fonzi Commissioner Jack Commissioner O'Grady Commissioner Slane Commissioner Marks Commissioner Heatherington Chairperson will read the decorum guidelines PLANNING COMMISSION BUSINESS APPROVAL OF AGENDA DISCLOSURE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS: Prior to a project hearing Planning Commission Members must disclose any communications they have had on any quasi-judicial agenda items. This includes, but is not limited to, tentative subdivision maps, parcel maps, variances, conditional use permits, and planned development permits. This does not disqualify the Planning Commission Member from participating and voting on the matter, but gives the public and applicant an opportunity to comment on the ex parte communication. PUBLIC COMMENT (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Commission on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Commission has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to five minutes. Please state your name and address for the record before making your presentation. The Commission may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda) City of Atascadero Planning Commission Agenda CONSENT CALENDAR Regular Meeting June 5, 2007 Page 2 of 6 (All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and non -controversial by City Staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Commission or public wishes to comment or ask questions.) 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON MAY 15, 2007. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORTS 2. PLN 2007-1206, 8970 Montecito Ave. Tree Removal Permit Owner: Kelly Gearhart, Morro Road Homes, LLC, 6205 Alcantara Ave., Atascadero, CA 93422 Applicant: Gearhart Development, 6205 Alcantara Ave., Atascadero, CA 93422 Certified Arborist: Steven Alvarez, A&T Arborist, 1565 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 Project Title: PLN 2007-1206 / Tree Removal Permit 2007-0104 Project 8970 Montecito Ave., Atascadero, CA 93422, Location: (San Luis Obispo County) APN 006-113-002 Project A request to remove one (1) native oak tree totaling 108 inches (dbh) found to be Description: hazardous by a Certified Arborist. The site is currently partially developed with a 2,876 square foot commercial building north of the tree. General Plan Designation: General Commercial (GC) Zoning District: Commercial Tourist (CT) Proposed Environmental Categorical Exemption; 15304 Minor Alterations to Land; Class 4 Determination: 3. PLN 2007-1183, FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PUBLIC HEARINGS (For each of the following items, the public will be given an opportunity to speak. After a staff report, the Chair will open the public hearing and invite the applicant or applicant's representative to make any comments. Members of the public will be invited to provide testimony to the Commission following the applicant. Speakers should state their name and address for the record and can address the Commission for five minutes. After all public comments have been received, the public hearing will be closed, and the Commission will discuss the item and take appropriate action(s).) City of Atascadero Planning Commission Agenda 4. PLN 2006-1119, 7155 Valle Ave. Regular Meeting June 5, 2007 Page 3 of 6 Owners/ Sean Knoph, Greg Wright and Lori Martin, 6590 Valle Ave, Atascadero, CA 93422 Applicants: PLN 2099-0480 / Tentative Parcel Map 2006-0083 Project Title: PLN 2006-1119 / Tentative Parcel Map 2006-0084 Project 7155 Valle Ave, Atascadero, CA 93422 Location: (San Luis Obispo County) APN 029-352-001 Project The project includes a Tentative Parcel Map which proposes a two (2) lot split in the RSF- Description• Y Zone (1 acre minimum lot size.) The existing lot is 2.33 acres gross (2.009 acres net) with an average slope of 33%. Parcel 1 is proposed at 1.0 acres gross on a 43% slope. A building envelope with a 10.6% slope is provided on Parcel 1 for one new residence; Proposed the site is currently vacant. Proposed Parcel 2 contains an existing residence and is Environmental proposed at 1.333 acre gross with a 25% slope. An emergency access easement is Determination: proposed on Parcel 1 to give a secondary emergency access route to Stadium Park. The site is covered by both Coast Live Oaks and Blue Oaks. The project proposal includes the removal of two Live Oaks (58" total DBH) and three Blue Oaks (63" total DBH) for the construction of the new residence, driveway, and emergency access road on proposed Parcel 1. The project will also include street improvements on Valle and Escarpa Ave. General Plan Designation: Single Family Residential (SFR -Y) Zoning District: Residential Single Family (RSF-Y) Proposed Based on the initial study prepared for the project, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is Environmental proposed. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for public review Determination: from 5/16/07 through 6/4/07 at 6907 EI Camino Real, Community Development Department, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. 5. PLN 2099-0480, 5485 Olmeda Ave. Owners: Rodney & Deborah Madruga, 5495 Olmeda Ave., Atascadero, CA 93422 Project Title: PLN 2099-0480 / Tentative Parcel Map 2006-0083 Project 5485 Olmeda Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422 Location: (San Luis Obispo County) APN 029-292-016 Project The project consists of a proposed condominium map over an existing lot of record to create Description: two (2) airspace units on one common lot. The lot is developed with one single-family residence and one additional unit for proposed construction. General Plan Designation: MDR Zoning District: Residential Multi -Family -10 (Maximum 10 du/ac) Proposed Class 15 Categorical Exemption; Minor Land Divisions Environmental Determination: City of Atascadero Planning Commission Agenda 6. PLN 2006-1178,10460 Portal Road Regular Meeting June 5, 2007 Page 4 of 6 Owner: Deborah Puma, 1408 Crown Way, Paso Robles, CA 93446 Applicant: Western Dairy Designers Associates, Inc., 316 West "F" Street, Suite 100, Oakdale, CA Project 95361 Project Title: PLN 2006-1178 / Amendment to building envelope on Lot 14 of TTM 2000-0001 Project 10460 Portal Road, Atascadero, CA 93422 Location: (San Luis Obispo County) APN 054-192-033 Project The proposed project consists of an amendment to the existing building envelope which was Description: approved with TTM 2000-0001 (Rancho de Paraiso subdivision map.) The project proposes modifications to the primary building envelope, and proposes the addition of a second Proposed building envelope on the other side of the lot for a secondary unit. The average slope on site Environmental is approximately 19%. The main residence is proposed at 3,716 square feet with a 1,156 Determination: square -foot attached garage on a 12% slope. The second unit is proposed at 998 square feet with an 821 square foot attached garage/ storage space on a 17% slope. 1,200 cubic yards of cut and 815 cubic yards of fill is required. A blueline creek runs through the property between the two building envelopes. A pedestrian bridge is proposed across the blueline creek. No native tree removals are proposed. 7 Blue Oaks and Valley Oaks will be impacted by the construction of the residences and the septic system. Both residences will connect to a septic system which is designed as a seepage pit (deep pit) disposal system. General Plan Designation: Rural Estate (RE) Zoning District: Residential Suburban (RS) Proposed Based on the initial study prepared for the project, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is Environmental proposed. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for public review Determination: from 5/16/07 through 6/4/07 at 6907 EI Camino Real, Community Development Department, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. 7. PLN 2007-1190, 9525 Gallina Court Owners: Milan & Ruth Vrajich, 9525 Gallina Ct., Atascadero, CA 93422 Project Title: PLN 2007-1190 / Conditional Use Permit for a Residential Care Facility Project 9525 Gallina Court, Atascadero, CA 93422 Location: (San Luis Obispo County) APN 054-272-025 Project The proposed project consists of an application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow 8 Description: residents in a residential care facility. The facility currently is licensed for 6 residents. The increase in the number of residents above 6 requires Conditional Use Permit approval. General Plan Designation: RE Zoning District: RS Proposed Environmental Notice of Exemption Determination: City of Atascadero Planning Commission Agenda 8. PLN 2099-0730, 5493 Traffic Way Regular Meeting June 5, 2007 Page 5 of 6 Owner: City of Atascadero, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 Project Title: PLN 2099-0730 / Conditional Use Permit 2003-0092 Amendment Project 5493 Traffic Way, Atascadero, CA 93422 Location: (San Luis Obispo County) APN 028-361-033 Project The proposed project consists of an application for an Amendment to Conditional Use Permit Description: 2003-0092 to allow an on-site Skate Park Facility. General Plan Designation: Industrial (1) Zoning District: Industrial (1) Proposed Environmental Consistent with Previously Filed Notice of Exemption dated June 17, 2003. Determination: COMMISSIONER COMMENTS AND REPORTS DIRECTOR'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be on June 19, 2007 at City Hall, Council Chambers, 6907 El Camino Real, Atascadero. Please note: Should anyone challenge in court any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to this public hearing. City of Atascadero Planning Commission Agenda Regular Meeting June 5, 2007 Page 6 of 6 City of Atascadero WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING The Planning Commission meets in regular session on the first and third Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m., at City Hall, Council Chambers, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero. Matters are considered by the Commission in the order of the printed Agenda. Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file in the office of the Community Development Department and are available for public inspection during City Hall Annex business hours at the Community Development counter and on our website, www.atascadero.org. An agenda packet is also available for public review at the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road. All documents submitted by the public during Commission meetings that are either read into the record or referred to in their statement will be noted in the minutes and available for review in the Community Development Department. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office, (805) 461-5000, or the City Clerk's Office, (805) 461-5000. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service. TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Chairperson will identify the subject, staff will give their report, and the Commission will ask questions of staff. The Chairperson will announce when the public comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the Commission regarding the matter being considered to step up to the podium. If you wish to speak for, against, or comment in any way: • You must approach the podium and be recognized by the Chairperson • Give your name and address (not required) • Make your statement • All comments should be made to the Chairperson and Commission • All comments limited to 5 minutes (unless changed by the Commission) • No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so, and no one may speak more than twice on any item. If you wish to use a computer presentation to support your comments, you must notify the Community Development Department at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Access to hook up your laptop to the City's projector will be provided. You are required to submit to the Recording Secretary a printed copy of your presentation for the record. Please check in with the Chairperson before the meeting begins to announce your presence and turn in the printed copy. The Chairperson will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public comments will be heard by the Council. TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA Under Agenda item, "PUBLIC HEARINGS", the Chairperson will call for anyone from the audience having business with the Commission to: • Please approach the podium and be recognized • Give your name and address (not required) • State the nature of your business This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Commission's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum (unless changed by the Commission). CALL TO ORDER ITEM NUMBER: 1 DATE: 6-5-07 CITY OF ATASCADERO PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT MINUTES Regular Meeting Tuesday, May 15, 2007 — 7:00 P.M. Vice Chairperson Fonzi called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and Commissioner Slane led the Pledge of Allegiance. Pr)l I rAl I Present: Commissioners Heatherington, Jack, Marks, O'Grady, Slane and Vice Chairperson Fonzi Absent: Chairperson O'Keefe (excused) Others Present: Recording Secretary Grace Pucci Staff Present: Community Development Director Warren Frace, Deputy Community Development Director Steve McHarris, Deputy Public Works Director David Athey, Associate Planner Kelly Gleason, and Assistant Planner Callie Taylor. PLANNING COMMISSION BUSINESS APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: By Commissioner Jack and seconded by Commissioner Heatherington to approve the agenda. Motion passed 6:0 by a roll -call vote. PC Draft Minutes 05/15/07 Page 1 of 10 DISCLOSURE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS: ■ Commissioner Jack: Had a phone conversation with Mr. Eddings regarding the EI Corte project, and he visited the site. He also visited the Vista, Marchant, and Falda sites. He received an email from Robin Houser and forwarded it on to staff. ■ Commissioner Heatherington: Spoke with Royce Eddings and visited the EI Corte site. She also visited the Vista and Marchant sites, and received an email from Robin Houser, which she has not yet read. ■ Commissioner Marks: Visited all sites and had a discussion with the developer for Item #5, met with neighbors on the opposite side of Falda for Item #7, and acknowledged an email from Robin and Gary Houser for Item #8. ■ Commissioner Slane: Attended the meeting on Friday, May 11, at the EI Corte site. ■ Commissioner O'Grady: Visited the EI Corte site, participated in the site visit, and talked with quite a few people on that site. He also visited the Falda and Vista Road sites. ■ Vice Chairperson Fonzi: Visited all the sites and spoke with several of the neighbors and the applicant on the EI Corte site. PUBLIC COMMENT None CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON MAY 1, 2007. 2. PLANNING COMMISSION TIME EXTENSION ON TTM 2004-0062, PLN 2099- 0895 FOR 1565 EL CAMINO REAL (ALVAREZ). MOTION: By Commissioner O'Grady and seconded by Commissioner Slane to approve Item #1. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll -call vote. (Jack abstained) MOTION: By Commissioner Slane and seconded by Commissioner Marks to approve Item #2. Motion passed 6:0 by a roll -call vote. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORTS PUBLIC HEARINGS PC Draft Minutes 05/15/07 Page 2 of 10 3. PLN 2006-1137, 10900 VISTA ROAD, GRADING ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 10% AND AN AMENDMENT TO MOVE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE. Owner & Larry and Ann Mathews, 5952 Bellingham Dr. Castro Valley, CA 94552 Applicant: Project Title: PLN 2006-1137. TRP 2007-0103. Grading on slopes greater than 10% and an Amendment to TTM 1982-0013 to move the building envelope. Project 10900 Vista Road, Atascadero, CA 93422 Location: (San Luis Obispo County) APN 055-161-030 Project The project consists of an application to construct a 4,278 square foot single-family residence Description: on an existing 8.8 acre lot of record. An Amendment is proposed to move the building envelope that was originally established with Tract Map 1382 (November 1990) to a new location approximately 600 feet west, towards the center of the site. The proposed project will require 3,610 cubic yards of cut and 3,610 cubic yards of fill, with a maximum cut of 11 feet and maximum fill of 14 feet. The project includes 580 lineal feet of retaining wall for the 700 foot long driveway. The driveway crosses a drainage swale which requires 163 lineal feet of 24 -inch HDPE storm drain. Native trees are proposed for removal, including one 38 -inch Live Oak and 9 smaller Live Oaks and Scrub Oaks ranging in size from 4 to 6 -inches. The proposed residence will utilize a septic system. General Plan Designation: RE Zoning District: RS-PD2 Proposed Based on the initial study prepared for the project, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is Environmental proposed. The Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for public review at 6907 El Determination: Camino Real, Community Development Department from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Assistant Planner Callie Taylor gave the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. PUBLIC COMMENT Robert Richmond, applicant's architect / representative, addressed issues raised by the Commissioners regarding the road grading and spoke about the project. Mr. Richmond answered questions of the Commission. Larry Mathews, applicant, explained that they did not approve grading to the extent that it occurred and apologized for the mistake. Mr. Mathews answered questions of the Commission. Ann Mathews, applicant, spoke about their desire to live in this area and stated that they had no intention of breaking the rules on this project. Vice Chairperson Fonzi closed the Public Comment period. There was Commission discussion regarding the non -approved grading that had been done on the property and possible consequences for that action. PC Draft Minutes 05/15/07 Page 3 of 10 MOTION: By Commissioner Slane and seconded by Commissioner Marks to adopt Resolution PC 2007-0042, certifying proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-0004, approving an amendment to the location of the building envelope on lot 14 of Tract 1382, and approving the removal of one 38 -inch Live Oak and nine 4-6 inch Live Oaks and Scrub Oaks, based on findings and subject to conditions, and that the applicant will pay the set fines for the illegal grading, and that Fish and Game be contacted to establish whether or not they need to be contacted for the grading impacts on the swale. Motion passed 6:0 by a roll -call vote. Commissioner Heatherington asked the applicant to inform staff of the individual(s) responsible for the grading in order for staff to educate them on the rules and regulations. Mr. Richmond stated he would give that information to staff. 4. PLN 2099-0079, AMENDMENT TO ZCH 2003-0041,11415 ELIANO STREET Owner & Trimark Pacific Homes, L.P., 3130 W. Main Street, Suite A-2, Visalia, CA 93291 Applicant: Project Title: Amendment to Zone Change 2003-0041/PLN 2099-0079 Project 11415 Eliano Street, Atascadero, CA 93422 Location: (San Luis Obispo County) APN 045-312-020 Project An application for an Amendment to a Specific Plan to: 1) add two additional house plans to the Description: three plans currently approved; and 2) approve a standard SFR -2 stucco finish. General Plan Designation: SPI Zoning District: SFR -X Proposed The proposed Amendment is consistent with previously approved CEQA documents. Environmental Determination: Deputy Community Development Director Steve McHarris gave the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. PUBLIC COMMENT Rick Lange, applicant's representative, spoke about the project and the reason for this request, and answered questions of the Commission. Vice Chairperson Fonzi closed the Public Comment period. MOTION: By Commissioner Jack and seconded by Commissioner Slane to adopt PC Resolution 2007-0005 to amend the Woodlands PC Draft Minutes 05/15/07 Page 4 of 10 Specific Plan (SP -1 of Zone Change 2003-0041) to add two new SFR -2 single-family plans, and add a condition of approval to require a light sand finish to all future SFR -2 exterior stucco applications, based on findings and subject to conditions of approval. Motion passed 6:0 by a roll -call vote. Chairperson Fonzi stated for the record that she voted for the amendment but would prefer to have the garages moved further back. 5. PLN 2099-0795,8570 EL CORTE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Owner & Royce Construction & Development, Inc., 10780 Vista Road, Atascadero, CA 93422 Applicant: Project Title: PLN 2099-0795/ZCH 2006-0112, CUP 2006-0178, TTM 2006-0082; Planned Development Project 8570 El Corte, Atascadero, CA 93422 Location: (San Luis Obispo County) APN 030-421-005 Project The proposed project consists of an application for a Zone Change, Conditional Use Permit, and Description: Tentative Tract Map for the construction of 7 new single-family detached homes on individual lots that will be developed under the requirements of the Planned Development Overlay #17. Proposed homes range from approximately 2681 square -feet to 2922 square -feet with two -car attached garages. Two native oak trees are proposed for removal. The project site contains an existing drainage way that contains riparian species and an identified wetland area. The immediate wetland area is proposed to remain and the applicant is proposing stem wall construction for all the units adjacent to the riparian area. The project will take access off of El Corte Road. Frontage improvements will be provided along El Corte Road and La Lima Ave. The development will be served by City sewer. General Plan Designation: Single -Family Residential (SFR -X) Zoning District: Residential Single -Family -X (RSF-X) Proposed Based on the initial study prepared for the project, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed. Environmental The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for public review at 6907 El Camino Determination: Real, Community Development Department, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Associate Planner Kelly Gleason gave the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. Chairperson Fonzi entered a letter from Chuck Ward into the record. (Exhibit A) PUBLIC COMMENT Royce Eddings, applicant, explained the differences between the project as proposed originally and as it is being presented tonight. Mr. Eddings answered questions of the Commission. Aaron Hooks, Delta Sierra Corporation, addressed issues regarding water quality. Bill Nelson stated he thought this was a fine project and gave it his support. PC Draft Minutes 05/15/07 Page 5 of 10 Robert O'Brien acknowledged that the applicant had addressed his concerns regarding drainage and trees, but explained that he thought the project was too dense for the neighborhood and asked the Commission to deny the zone change and permission for building in the current density. Russ Thompson spoke in support of this version of the project and stated this would be a nice addition to the neighborhood, which he overlooks from his home. Katherine McDonald thanked the applicant for reaching out to the neighbors and for the thought put into the details; however she still has concerns regarding the density of the project, and asked the Commission to deny the overlay. Jim O'Connell stated his concerns for the density of the project and traffic in the area. He asked that the Commission stay with the current zoning for the property. Chad Bayer commented that this is a nice project and fits in with the neighborhood. Jim O'Connell indicated that there is a lot of open land behind the home of one of the neighbor's, and asked if this were approved, would it open a door to developing that open space in the future. Mrs. Cardinale stated that she is concerned with the density and the wall to be built between her property and this project, and asked who would be responsible for maintenance of that wall. Vice Chairperson Fonzi closed the Public Comment period. Staff addressed questions raised during the Public Comment period. all A[0016]►yiI LTA Z 11 Jim O'Connell explained his concerns regarding traffic issues for this area and specifically Chalk Mountain Village. Vice Chairperson Fonzi closed the Public Comment period. Deputy Public Works Director David Athey stated he would take Mr. O'Connell's concerns back to a meeting scheduled later this month between the City Engineer, Police Department, and City Operations Department. MOTION: By Vice Chairperson Fonzi and seconded by Commissioner Slane to adopt Resolution PC 2007-0037 recommending the City Council certify Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2006-0031; and, adopt Resolution PC 2007-0038 recommending the City Council introduce an ordinance for PC Draft Minutes 05/15/07 Page 6 of 10 first reading by title only, to approve Zone Change 2006-0112 based on findings; and, adopt Resolution PC 2007-0039 recommending the City Council approve Conditional Use Permit 2006-0178 based on findings and subject to Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring; and, adopt Resolution PC 2007-0040 recommending the City Council approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map 2006-0082 based on findings and subject to Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring, and that the Conditions include the pedestrian bridge be included as part of the connection for pedestrians as approved by the City Engineer, and that this be given the correct zoning designation, and that retaining walls that are put on the project be maintained by the homeowners' association. Motion passed 6:0 by a roll -call vote. Chairperson Fonzi recessed the hearing at 8:49 p.m. Chairperson Fonzi called the meeting back to order at 8:56 p.m. 6. PLN 2007-1208, AMENDMENT TO SIGN PROGRAM AT 2300 EL CAMINO MISSION OAKS Owner: John Wilson/Tom Murrell, 505 Higuera St. #105, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Applicant: Pierre Rademaker Design, 738 Higuera St. Ste. F, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Project Title: PLN 2007-1208; Amendment to sign program at Mission Oaks Project 2300 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 Location: (San Luis Obispo County) APN 049-141-056 Project The proposed project consists of an Amendment to the sign program for Mission Oaks @ The Description: Annex. General Plan Designation: CPK Zoning District: CPK—PD1 Proposed The proposed amendment is consistent with previously approved CEQA documents. Environmental Determination: Assistant Planner Callie Taylor gave the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. PUBLIC COMMENT Pierre Rademaker, applicant, addressed issues raised by the Commission and answered their questions. PC Draft Minutes 05/15/07 Page 7 of 10 Vice Chairperson Fonzi closed the Public Comment period. MOTION: By Commissioner Marks and seconded by Commissioner Jack to adopt Resolution PC 2007-0041 to approve PLN 2007-1208 (amendment to Master Sign Program) based on findings and subject to conditions of approval. Motion passed 6:0 by a roll -call vote. 7. PLN 2006-1161, VARIANCE FOR 3300 FALDA Owner: Francis & Khay Svedas, PO Box 1275, Atascadero, CA 93423 Applicant: James V. Shepard Co., 1900 Spring Street, Paso Robles, CA 93446 Project Title: PLN 2006-1161, VAR 2007-0011 Project 3300 Falda, Atascadero, CA 93422 Location: (San Luis Obispo County) APN 049-302-039 Project An application for a Variance from the front setback. Applicant is proposing to reduce the front Description: setback to 10 feet from the edge of the right of way to the proposed residence due to the steeply sloped lot. General Plan Designation: RE Zoning District: RS Proposed A Mitigated Negative Declaration 2006-0034 was prepared for PPN 2006-0217. The MND was Environmental posted November 29, 2006 through December 18, 2006 and recorded on February 1, 2007. Determination: Assistant Planner Callie Taylor gave the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. PUBLIC COMMENT James Shepard, applicant's representative, stated they agree with the stem wall construction and explained how they would be placing the home on the property and the grading they would like to do. Mr. Shepard distributed plans to the Commission demonstrating how the applicant would like the grading to be done, and answered their questions. Vice Chairperson Fonzi closed the Public Comment period. There was Commission discussion regarding the submitted plans and it was decided that this item should be continued, and staff is to work with the applicant on location of the septic system, flooding, creating a more aesthetically pleasing wall on the south elevation, the fence at the front the home, and correction of the drawings. MOTION: By Commissioner O'Grady and seconded by Commissioner Jack to continue this item. PC Draft Minutes 05/15/07 Page 8 of 10 Motion passed 6:0 by a roll -call vote. 8. PLN 2006-1172, VARIANCE FOR 6200 MARCHANT AVE. Owner & Christopher Austin, 1923 Kleck Road, Paso Robles, CA 93446 Applicant: Project Title: PLN 2006-1172, VAR 2007-0012 Project 6200 Marchant Ave., Atascadero, CA 93422 Location: (San Luis Obispo County) APN 030-221-026 Project A request to allow a front setback Variance for a proposed multi -family development to save an Description: existing native oak tree. The resulting setback would be a minimum of 5 -feet from Alcantara Ave right-of-way. General Plan Designation: MDR Zoning District: RMF -10 Proposed Exempt per section 15303: New construction or conversion of small structures. Environmental Determination: Associate Planner Kelly Gleason gave the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. PUBLIC COMMENT Chris Thomas, applicant's representative, explained the reason for the Variance request. David Lowe expressed concern that this project is not compatible with the existing neighborhood, and stated he is opposed to the idea of narrowing the street through the placement of the homes. He recommended denying the setback but does support the applicant in their project. Daniel Davis stated he felt this would close in the neighborhood and expressed concern that the 5 foot setback might set a precedent for further development of this property. He was also concerned with the appearance of the fencing and visibility at the corner of Alcantara. Vice Chairperson Fonzi closed the Public Comment period. Staff addressed issues raised during the Public Comment period. MOTION: By Commissioner Jack and seconded by Commissioner Marks to adopt Resolution PC 2007-0006 to approve the requested front setback variance subject to findings and conditions of approval, and adding front setback and interior setback PC Draft Minutes 05/15/07 Page 9 of 10 variance, and not exceeding the three foot height at the site triangle at the entrance of Alcantara and Marchant, and allow the rear yard fencing to be adjusted by staff so there is not access for vehicle parking under the tree. Motion passed 6:0 by a roll -call vote. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS AND REPORTS Commissioner Heatherington stated she wants those who do development in the community to follow the correct procedures. Commissioner O'Grady asked for staff comment and recommendations on how to better communicate the concerns raised by Commissioner Heatherington. Community Development Director Warren Frace explained what actions are available to staff for those who violate the codes. Commissioner Marks questioned whether the Commission could recommend to the City Council compensation of staff time for pursuing violations. Director Frace stated the Commission could make such a recommendation to Council. DIRECTOR'S REPORT Community Development Director Warren Frace updated the Commission on the City Council's ruling on the Creek Setback issue, and explained the police presence at tonight's meeting. Director Frace reviewed the agenda for the June 5t" meeting. ADJOURNMENT Vice Chairperson Fonzi adjourned the meeting at 10:24 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission on June 5, 2007. MINUTES PREPARED BY: Grace Pucci, Recording Secretary The following exhibit is available for review in the Community Development Department: Exhibit A — Chuck Ward, letter. PC Draft Minutes 05/15/07 Page 10 of 10 ITEM NUMBER: 2 DATE: 6-5-07 Atascadero Planning Commission Staff Report - Community Development Department Tree Removal Permit PLN 2007-1206/TRP 2007-0104 (8970 Montecito) SUBJECT: A request to remove one (1) native oak tree totaling 108" (dbh) (consisting of two 54" trunks) found to be hazardous by a Certified Arborist. There is a 2,876 square foot commercial building located adjacent to the tree. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the current condition of the tree, staff recommends: 1. The Planning Commission adopt Resolution PC 2007-0047 to approve the request to remove one (1) 108" (dbh) native oak tree subject to findings and conditions of approval. Situation and Facts: 1. Owner/Applicant: 2. Certified Arborist: 3. Project Address: 4. General Plan Designation 5. Zoning District: BACKGROUND: Morro Road Homes, LLC, 6205 Alcantara Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 A & T Arborist — Steven Alvarez, 1565 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 8970 Montecito, Atascadero, CA 93422 APN: 006-113-002 General Commercial (GC) Commercial Tourist (CT) The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 2006-0085) to create three commercial parcels along Montecito Avenue on August 15, 2006. The native tree in question is the only native tree on the site and was proposed to remain. A 2,876 square foot building was constructed adjacent to the tree (within the drip line) and was determined by the Project Arborist that the construction did not impact the health of the tree. ANALYSIS: Staff has received an updated site inspection letter from an Arborist listing the status of the existing tree. The Arborist states that the 108" tree poses a serious hazard and should be removed immediately. The Arborist filled out a hazard evaluation form for the tree and giving it a hazard rating of 11 out of 12 based on the extent of decay and size of the cavity at the base of the tree, and the location being next to an occupied building and pedestrian sidewalk. Based on this analysis of the current condition of the tree, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission make the required finding for removal of the 108" native tree. Staff has identified finding (i), listed below, as appropriate to this request. If the requested removal is approved, the applicant will be required to mitigate the removal based on the requirements listed in the Atascadero Native Tree Ordinance as shown in the chart below. Evergreen Native Trees (inches) Deciduous Native Trees (inches) Totals dbh notes dbh notes 1 108 -inches 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 Total 108 -inches Total 0 -inches 108 -inches Mitigation Requirement req'd tree replacements: 36 five gal trees req'd tree replacements: 0 five gal trees 36 five gal trees Proposed Replanting 0 five gal trees Proposed Replanting 0 five gal trees 0 five gal trees 0 box trees (24") 0 box trees (24") 0 box trees (24") Remaining Mitigation 36 five gal trees Remaining Mitigation 0 five gal trees 36 five gal trees Tree Fund Payment: $ 1,800.00 Tree Fund Payment: $ $ 1,800.00 FINDINGS: Pursuant to the Tree Ordinance (Ordinance No. 214), "...decisions on native tree removals of 24 -inch dbh-size or larger shall be made by the Planning Commission." In considering any Tree Removal Permit request, at least one of the findings must be made. (i) The tree is dead, diseased or injured beyond reclamation, as certified by a tree condition report from an arborist; (ii) The tree is crowded by other healthier native trees; thinning (removal) would promote healthier growth in the trees to remain, as certified by a tree condition report from an arborist; (iii) The tree is interfering with existing utilities and/or structures, as certified by a report from the site planner; (iv)The tree is inhibiting sunlight needed for existing and/or proposed active or passive solar heating or cooling, as certified by a report from the site planner; (v) The tree is obstructing proposed improvements that cannot be reasonably designed to avoid the need for tree removal, as certified by a report from the site planner and determined by the Community Development Department based on the following factors: a. Early consultation with the City, b. Consideration of practical design alternatives, c. Provision of cost comparisons (from applicant) for practical design alternatives, d. If saving tree eliminates all reasonable use of the property, or e. Saving the tree requires the removal of more desirable trees. Staff has identified finding (i) as applicable in this case based on the provided arborist report. ALTERNATIVES: 1. The Planning Commission can refer the project back to the applicant and staff for additional information. 2. The Planning Commission can approve the requested tree removal. 3. The Planning Commission can deny the tree removal. CONCLUSION: The applicant is proposing to remove one, 108" dbh native tree that has been deemed hazardous by a Certified Arborist. The tree is adjacent to a commercial building that is in use. Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission make the required findings for removal of the tree. PREPARED BY: Mathew Fawcett, Planning Technician ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: Project Location Attachment 2: Current Site Condition Letter Attachment 3: Hazardous Tree Evaluation Attachment 4: Draft Resolution PC 2007-0047 Attachment 1: Project Location 1 71 Odd Y Project Site: a , 8970 Montecito z Zoning: CT (Commercial Tourist) General Plan Designation: GC (General Commercial) Attachment 2: Current Site Condition Update Letter A die T ARDOR=STS~ P.O. BOX 1311 TEMPLETON, CA 9346 (90.i') 4340131 April 10, 2007 RECEIVED APR 1 9 2007 Kelly Gearhart Gearhart Development COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6205 Alcantara Road Atascadero, CA 93422 Addendum #1; for Montecito development, oak tree cavity and hazard. Kelly, attached is a "Tree Hazard Evaluation Form" that was completed for your Montecito development, in addition I have attached three photos that shows the serious hazard the subject tree presents to the adjacent structure. In short the subject tree poses a serious hazard and should be removed immediately. Please let me know if we may be of any further assistance to you for this project. Steven G. Alvarez Certified Arborist #WE -051 I Attachment 3: Hazardous Tree Evaluation EVALUATION OF HAZ.- KD TREES 0 A Photographic Guice to the Evaluation of Hazard Trees in Urban Areas TREE HAZARD EVAL UA TION FORM 2nd Edition SITE CONOmONS Site Character. O residence %(commercial O indusieial C p&—x :C open spas C mural C woodlarlQddrest Landscapehp=Jq, parkway .i raesed bed O connoer C m:und C lawn L_: Nrub border J wind Wok irrigation: �:lgne J16adegWle Cinadeduate Oacei9lve :-tank wedkd - Recent sine dlMMance7 CY) N C; COrWfUenern�idl disbrbarta O grade a tinge 7 ere clearing J sre cltannq dnpline paved 10.25 t 507. 53.75% 75100% Paremenl lined? Y N %dnphnc.1fill snit: 10-25% 25-50% 50-75% 75-100% %dnpline grade lowered: *25% 25.50% 50.75% 75100% Soil problems: ❑ drainage .3 snallow❑compacted 0drangley Csaline Jatraline ❑acidic sena!viNwne idol sw center Jhfston of lad C Cray = e edwisive 13 Owe aspect obsmciions: Ohl ❑ sagnage O fine -d -sod C wew O owned wxS.17 Wldeagrou W urines ; ; IradK L7 adpcenlveg. J Exposure to wind' O single vet ❑ below CartiaN Vaoove canopy ❑ recently e»osed ❑ wwWward. canopy edge ❑ area prone to wndnrow Pfrvailing wind dvectim:/r!�S 1L - Omurerrt d srow✓re Norms ❑ new O seldom ❑ reguory TARGET Use Under Tree: fi(buddvq O paAmg ❑ balfic Elpedestran C ravafim O lanosape O ardsape O stinal Iatures ❑ uffkty ores Can target be mored? Y t�* Can asp be resbided7 Y r4l ompancy: O omsioal use ❑ ntertmnW use wrepuent ux O cort=nt use The Into boil Society of Mboriaelauc assumes no responsibility lot mtdmoro or nxanrtendaaons derived from the of tnts form Specimen: TREE HAZARD EVALUATION FORM, Page I id.Madeess: niNiac r.CR r C, ,c~. t .3 T AL_ I � d NA2M0 MTUWe / Q 7 tap tucapon _SZs - Z3(1- s- lr% le Faellre Sit Tyge1 nalaro nrner Probe pnvaw unie npwn goner Potentia; p pin gable aaprq Ole. 16-7-07 Inspeau nruneaule action needed Needs lunrer inspection odd uee TREE CHARACTERISTICS F tree r. I_ species Qv Kut ern r izl:'c ogn: �[_ r 01 fronts: MergrtL _Spread: Farm: / generaly symnicinc � n indr asymfnerry '= maldr aS/trunGffy _ stump somal _ vad-naded Gown class: _ aornow" 'O c"onwLam Z m6emlldate _ suppressed Live :—. tali.: gf) . Age cia= o young r sena--.ajWnr JG farune --o -ralwat$eescenl Pruning nMWY: a crown cleaned U eatssry ly Mm ed O lopped )crown closed C poitartalto = Down feAlCen lli r cols _. caned/bfaced :J none 1 murrlpt pruning events Approa. dates. /— 3 Special Value: C Specimen :J henUgdMAaric C wid fie C unusual 7—n street Tree C screen _ Nude )?,nd qer o prdKted oy qpv agency TREE HEALTH Foliage calor. ll�nortnal O Worosc ❑ necrotic Epirormks? Y Growth ap;/ructlewc Foliage dfutsity: it normal E , sparse Leal site: )Kegnnal `; st1WI 2 suiom _ —bi es -- egos _ caows Annual spool erawtd ^ cmellernt R average O poor Twig 01eoact? Y (10, J mrbm"-,e r -- guards W—dw.od deYtlopnnent gaverage :1 poor 0 none _: olnler ��❑((''-cedern Vlgw elan ❑ Otalem yy awave O tw G poor SITE CONOmONS Site Character. O residence %(commercial O indusieial C p&—x :C open spas C mural C woodlarlQddrest Landscapehp=Jq, parkway .i raesed bed O connoer C m:und C lawn L_: Nrub border J wind Wok irrigation: �:lgne J16adegWle Cinadeduate Oacei9lve :-tank wedkd - Recent sine dlMMance7 CY) N C; COrWfUenern�idl disbrbarta O grade a tinge 7 ere clearing J sre cltannq dnpline paved 10.25 t 507. 53.75% 75100% Paremenl lined? Y N %dnphnc.1fill snit: 10-25% 25-50% 50-75% 75-100% %dnpline grade lowered: *25% 25.50% 50.75% 75100% Soil problems: ❑ drainage .3 snallow❑compacted 0drangley Csaline Jatraline ❑acidic sena!viNwne idol sw center Jhfston of lad C Cray = e edwisive 13 Owe aspect obsmciions: Ohl ❑ sagnage O fine -d -sod C wew O owned wxS.17 Wldeagrou W urines ; ; IradK L7 adpcenlveg. J Exposure to wind' O single vet ❑ below CartiaN Vaoove canopy ❑ recently e»osed ❑ wwWward. canopy edge ❑ area prone to wndnrow Pfrvailing wind dvectim:/r!�S 1L - Omurerrt d srow✓re Norms ❑ new O seldom ❑ reguory TARGET Use Under Tree: fi(buddvq O paAmg ❑ balfic Elpedestran C ravafim O lanosape O ardsape O stinal Iatures ❑ uffkty ores Can target be mored? Y t�* Can asp be resbided7 Y r4l ompancy: O omsioal use ❑ ntertmnW use wrepuent ux O cort=nt use The Into boil Society of Mboriaelauc assumes no responsibility lot mtdmoro or nxanrtendaaons derived from the of tnts form Specimen: TREE HAZARD EVALUATION FORM, Page I Attachment 3: Hazardous Tree Evaluation EVALUAT. _; TREES FOR HAZARD .11 TREE DEFECTS ROOIOFFECrs. Yusoen cool roc r ElpoTed�n'1dnJ1tRots 7-mft�f pinned coat aca: Rool JttJ aReeltd'Rtyfnatd �"'� •owM1W: Jeq. rlanremtJl Ow PVlenbal IW 'M fah, .`1 ty�CFO':((GL_ ;e.Yfe n�ykyJit 'Rr .N1.131nMalurY OtoY m pone a Iran N Root >HLcar. •rN Sal ntarMq_ Y y ttroten CompouMinq gaoft r% ls� Sa1 cracfnq: r N CROWN OEFECIS: Ir b_o, --�-- — _ leansftmry: ;e—ry Uspec Otrio2 - Faiwe Ddevrgt I - bfr. 2 - maim:T-7;;• d - stunt Ire POM11tid1 . 5a of Part 31gN ^0 d q� --�— S're of pWC t - c6' (IS an): 2 - 6-W • I ant: 3 - 0.30" (,15-7 • ' ---�- urger rn.Iq. ' 2.re+m agm Otte HAZARD ABATEMENT 3 feauex ust . corfsnra use Prune: O remove dNt_ part L reduce d G vown clean Gas ^ 7/$t Cable/Brace: CUbGf' O tro.wf reduce J r�xe G SAape Remo" rrte: l -`NRpyp2N -_ amore IargeC Y N kt kea t"w C : roof sown ❑ d=y - anal O moroor �Y- OtAa: Effect on adjacent trees' O cvannle Notlllatiac t4 owner O mragn 0 po--V V. -Y Data COMMENTS 1_3 Specimen: TREE HAZARD EVALUATION FORM, FIV 2 Attachment 4: Draft Resolution PC 2007-0047 DRAFT RESOLUTION PC 2007-0047 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 2007-0104 TO ALLOW THE REMOVAL OF ONE NATIVE TREE LOCATED AT 8970 MONTECITO AVENUE APN 006-113-002 (TRP 2007-0104) WHEREAS, an application for a Tree Removal Permit has been received from Morro Road Homes, LLC, 6205 Alcantara Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422, Property Owner and Applicant, to allow the removal of one native oak tree totaling 108" (dbh) located at 8970 Montecito, APN 006-113-002, and, WHEREAS; the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed Tree Removal application on June 5, 2007, and considered testimony and reports from staff, the applicants, and the public; and, NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero takes the following actions: SECTION 1. Findings for Approval of Tree Removal Permit. The Planning Commission finds as follows: The tree is dead, diseased or injured beyond reclamation, as certified by a tree condition report from an arborist, If the Planning Commission finds that the tree meets the removal criteria of the Native Tree Ordinance. SECTION 2. Approval. The Planning Commission hereby approves Tree Removal Permit 2007-0102 subject to the following: Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval Exhibit B: Site Plan On motion by Commissioner , and seconded by Commissioner the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: ( ) NOES: ( ) ABSENT: ( ) ABSTAIN: ( ) ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA Joan O'Keefe Planning Commission Chairperson Attest: Warren M. Frace Planning Commission Secretary Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval Tree Removal - PLN 2007-1206/TRP 2007-0104 Conditions Of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation TRP 2007-0104 /Monitoring Measure PR: Pnorto Removal PS: Planning Services 8970 Montecito Avenue BL: Business License BS: Building Services BP: Building Permit FD: Fire Department TO: Temporary Occupancy PD: Police Department F0: Final Occupancy CE: City Engineer WW: Wastewater CA: City Attorney Planning Services 1. The applicant shall mitigate the removal of the trees in PR PS accordance with the requirements of the Atascadero Native Tree Ordinance. Evergreen Native Trees (inches) Deciduous Native Trees (inches) dbh notes 1 108 -inches 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 Total 108 -inches Mitigation Requirement req'd tree replacements: Proposed Replanting 36 five gal trees 0 five gal trees 0 box trees (24") dbh notes Total 0 -inches req'd tree replacements: 0 five gal trees Proposed Replanting 0 five gal trees 0 box trees (24") Totals 108 -inches 36 five gal trees 0 five gal trees 0 box trees (24") Remaining Mitigation 36 five gal trees Remaining Mitigation 0 five gal trees 36 five gal trees Tree Fund Payment: $ 1,800.00 Tree Fund Payment: $ $ 1,800.00 Exhibit B: Proposed Site Plan Tree Removal - TRP 2007-0104 ! fI 108" Live Oak Tree — r)rtfl�f Approved for removal p + Irr,lf r , h L !ij M \ i I lfrrll�Jf I fill 'Jlrrtfli r I �JjJffllll/y SII rrlllrlrllr IIIlrrrJT 'lif i if Building currently occupied. / ! / 5 N !T � � fY D AR OU % ITEM NUMBER: 3 DATE: 6-5-07 Atascadero Planning Commission Staff Report - Public Works Department 2005 Five -Year Capital Improvement Program (City of Atascadero) SUBJECT: Planning Commission annual review and approval of the City's Five -Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt Resolution PC 2007-0045 notifying the City Council that the Planning Commission has found the 2007 Five -Year Capital Improvement Program consistent with the General Plan, based on findings. Situation and Facts: 1. Applicant: City of Atascadero Public Works Department, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 2. Project Location: Citywide 3. Environmental Status: Consistent with the adopted General Plan EIR and mitigation monitoring program. Individual CIP projects are subject to CEQA review. Background: The 2002 General Plan identifies the following Policies and Programs that require the City to prepare, review, and approve a Capital Improvement Program that is consistent with the General Plan Goals, Policies, and Programs, as listed below: • Policy 15.2: Maintain an updated Capital Improvements Program (CIP) that forecasts needs at least five years into the future and conforms to General plan policies and programs. - Program 1: The Planning Commission shall annually review the Capital Improvements Program for consistency with the General Plan and forward its findings to the City Council. Staff has prepared this report, attachments, and exhibits for Planning Commission review, comment, and recommendation to the City Council. Per the General Plan, this CIP review will occur on an annual basis. The last Planning Commission review occurred on April 4, 2006. Analysis: Staff has selected projects for the next five years that will conform to the General plan policies and programs under the available funding. Listed below are General Plan Policies and how the Capital Improvement Program complies with them: 1. ROADS AND BRIDGE PROJECTS a. Circulation Element Policy 1.3. Maintain Length of Service (LOS) C or better as the standard at all intersections and on all arterials and collectors. - Interchange Improvement Study and Improvements. Improvements to increase capacity and level of service to the following roads crossing US 101 from EI Camino Real to westerly connectors: Santa Barbara Road, Santa Rosa Road, Curbaril Avenue, San Anselmo Avenue and Del Rio Road. Increase capacity and LOS on interchanges. b. Circulation Element Policy 1.1.1. Maintain an updated Capital Improvement Plan and pursue construction of the circulation system improvements listed in the Table III -11 of the Circulation Element. - Santa Cruz Road landslide repair will maintain a circulation plan road listed in Table III -11 of the Circulation Element. 2. DRAINAGE PROJECTS a. Safety & Noise Element Polices "Develop a prioritized list of proposed capital improvement projects for low-lying, flood -prone areas, and seek funding for these projects." - Drainage Improvement Program. This CIP program focuses projects to mitigate flooding and drainage impacts. Some of the areas it focuses on are Marchant Avenue and San Jacinto Road. 3. FACILITIES PROJECTS a. LOC Policy 12.2.2. "Establish a community/youth recreation center in the vicinity of Downtown." - Construction of new Corporation Yard. This project moved the old Corporation Yard off a site that can now be used as a Youth Center. 4. PARKS PROJECTS a. LOC Policy 12.2.1. Promote the Zoo, Lake Park, and other City Parks as unique and valuable attractions. - Projects include the renovation of the Atascadero Lake Park upper restroom to make it ADA accessible, the Santa Rosa Road Pedestrian Bridge replacement, and Lake Park Parking Lot Renovations. b. LOC Policy 12.2.2. "Establish a community/youth recreation center in the vicinity of Downtown." - Construction of Youth Center. The construction, site improvements and furnishings for a new Youth Center. Construction of Phase I is currently underway. F�uI�Y�I��_1►1x�1��y�3�111x�1•� a. Circulation Element Policy 2.3.4. "Enhance the Downtown streetscape so that it is an enjoyable experience for pedestrians."; and LOC Policy 4.2.3. "Develop a comprehensive streetscape and pedestrian access plan for the Downtown area. - Downtown Streetscape Projects. Pedestrian and operational improvements including bulb outs, landscaped medians, street furniture, and lighting for the Downtown according to the RVC Plan. - Pedestrian Tunnel Improvements. Entrance improvements to the eastern end of the pedestrian tunnel. b. LOC Policy 1.3.10. "The City will develop standards and underground districts to require the under grounding of existing utilities with in the urban core" - Downtown Underground Utility Project. Underground of overhead utilities. According to Program 1 above, the Planning Commission shall review the improvement program for consistency with the General Plan and forward its findings to the City Council. General Plan Circulation Capital Improvements Table III -11 (Attachment A), provides a summary of circulation -related capital improvements to be implemented. The proposed Five -Year CIP incorporates improvements from this adopted list to be constructed. Findings: As identified in the General Plan, and attached as Exhibit A, the Capital Improvement Plan shall be approved by the Planning Commission with appropriate findings, as follows: (i) The updated Capital Improvements Program forecasts needs at least five years into the future and conforms to General Plan Goals, Policies and Programs and the overall intent of the General Plan; (ii) Implementation of the Capital Improvements Program aides in providing a safe and efficient circulation system that serves all segments of the community, and is designed and constructed to preserve rural character; and (iii) Implementation of the Capital Improvements Program will not create any new significant and unavoidable impacts to traffic, infrastructure or public services; and (iv) The Capital Improvements Program is consistent with the adopted General Plan EIR and mitigation monitoring program. ALTERNATIVES: 1. The Planning Commission may find the CIP inconsistent with the General Plan. 2. The Planning Commission may continue the application and refer the project back to staff for additional information or analysis. PREPARED BY: Steve Kahn, Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: General Plan Summary of Circulation Element Capital Improvements Attachment 2: General Plan Circulation Mitigation Projects Map Attachment 3: Draft Resolution 2007-0045 Attachment 1: General Plan Circulation Capital Improvements (Table III -11) Table III -11: Summary of Circulation Element Capital Improvements Key Road Class Street/Location Improvement Type Comments A-1 Roadway San Anselmo: US 101 — Monterey Road Circulation/access improvements A-2 Roadway Via Road: Ensenada — Mercedes — Traffic Way Widen lanes, replace bridge, bike & pedestrian facilities A-3 Roadway Curbaril: ECR to US 101 Circulation/access improvements A-4 Roadway Santa Barbara: ECR to US 101 Widen to 4 -lanes A-5 Roadway Santa Cruz: ECR — Carrizo Road A-6 Roadway ECR: Santa Barbara — Via Camino Widen to 4 lanes; bikeway; Sidewalks A-7 Roadway ECR: Via Camino — Santa Rosa Raised median; channelization; bikeway A-8 Roadway ECR: Santa Rosa — Curbaril Raised median; channelization; bikeway A-9 Roadway ECR: Curbaril — SR 41 Raised median; channelization; bikeway A-10 Roadway ECR: SR 41— Rosario Raised median; bulb -outs; channelization; bikeway A-11 Roadway ECR: Rosario — San Anselmo Raised median; channelization; bikeway A-12 Roadway ECR: San Anselmo — Del Rio Raised median; channelization; bikeway A-13 Roadway ECR: Del Rio — Santa Cruz Widen to 4 Lanes; raised median; channelization; bikeway A-14 Roadway Santa Ysabel: Curbaril — SR 41 Widening; bikeway; sidewalks A-15 Roadway Traffic Way / Olmeda - San Jacinto Frontage improvements A-16 Roadway Carmelita/Morro Road Extend as 2 -lane collector south to Morro Road (SR 41) A-17 Roadway Halcon Road: Via Camino — Santa Barbara Intersection improvements / roadway improvements to arterial A-18 Roadway Traffic Way / Ardilla / Santa Lucia Roadway / intersection improvements B-1 Intersection ECR/Santa Barbara Intersection Improvements / signal B-2 Intersection ECR/Santa Rosa Intersection improvements B-3 Intersection ECR/Juni ero Signal B-4 Intersection ECR/Curbaril Intersection improvements B-5 Intersection ECR/Traffic Way Intersection improvements B-6 Intersection ECR/W. San Anselmo Intersection improvements B-8 Intersection ECR/E. San Anselmo Intersection improvements / signal B-9 Intersection ECR/Del Rio Intersection improvements B-10 Intersection ECR/San Ramon Signal B-11 Intersection ECR/Pueblo Avenue Signal C-1 Bride Santa Lucia at Graves Creek Reconstruct bridge C-2 Bride Garcia Road at Graves Creek Reconstruct Bridge C-3 Bridge Lewis Avenue Construct bridge across Atascadero Creek PSR completed; $2 million C-4 Bride Santa Cruz west of San Ramon Bridge across Graves Creek/ extend road C-7 Bride Llano at Graves Creek Construct Bridge D-1 US 101 / SR 41 ECR/SR 41/ US 101 Reconstruct Interchange; ramp relocation; signals; widening Part of SR 41 funded project D-2 SR 41 State Route 41: US 101 —San Gabriel Widen to 4 -lanes D-3 US 101 Santa Barbara/US 101 Interchange Improvement D-4 US 101 I Santa Rosa/US 101 Interchange Improvement D-5 US 101 Curbaril/US 101 Interchange Improvement Attachment 1: General Plan Circulation Capital Improvements (Table 111-11) Key Road Class Sth•eet/Location Improvement Type Comments D-6 US 101 Traffic Way/US 101 Interchange Improvement D-7 US 101 San Anselmo/US 101 Interchange Improvement D-8 US 101 Del Rio/US 101 Interchange Improvement D-9 US 101 Route US 101 within URL Operational Improvements Misc. Citywide Safety improvement program Misc. Citywide Traffic calming ro ects Misc. Citywide Dial -A -Ride improvements Misc. Citywide Regional transit improvements Misc. Citywide Park -and -Ride expansion Misc. Citywide Safe routes to school Misc. Citywide Miscellaneous arterial and collector road maintenance Misc. Citywide Intersection improvements Misc. Citywide Miscellaneous walkways Misc. Lewis/Santa Ysabel Bike route Misc. Curbaril/Salinas River Bridge Bike route [!� Misc. Atascadero to Templeton Bike route Multi -jurisdictional project ATTACHMENT 3: Draft Resolution PC 2007-0045 Variance DRAFT RESOLUTION PC 2007-0045 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE 2007 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN (City of Atascadero) WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero 2002 General Plan requires the Planning Commission to; and, WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero 2002 General Plan requires the City maintain an updated Capital Improvement Plan and pursue its implementation; and, WHEREAS, the project is consistent with the adopted General Plan EIR and mitigation monitoring program; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing on June 5, 2007; and, NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, hereby resolves to take the following actions: SECTION 1. Findings of Approval. The Planning Commission finds: (i) The updated Capital Improvement Program forecasts needs at least five years into the future and conforms to General Plan Goals, Policies and Programs and the overall intent of the General Plan; (ii) Implementation of the Capital Improvement Program aides in providing a safe and efficient circulation system that serves all segments of the community, and is designed and constructed to preserve rural character; and (iii) Implementation of the Capital Improvement Program will not create any new significant and unavoidable impacts to traffic, infrastructure or public services; and (iv) The Capital Improvement Program is consistent with the adopted General Plan EIR and mitigation monitoring program. SECTION 2. Approval. The Planning Commission finds the 2007 Five -Year Capital Improvement Program consistent with the General Plan and subject to the following: EXHIBIT A: 2007 Five Year Capital Improvement Plan On motion by Commissioner , and seconded by Commissioner the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: ( ) NOES: ( ) ABSENT: ( ) ABSTAIN: ( ) ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA Joan O'Keefe Planning Commission Chairperson Attest: Warren M. Frace Planning Commission Secretary EXHIBIT A: 2007 Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan The following pages give a brief description Capital Improvement Plan. Projects listed in Year Capital Improvement Program, but do r comprehensive list follows the narrative. of the projects proposed for the Five Year italics and underlined are a part of the Five A have funding in fiscal years 2007-2009. A CATEGORY A: ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Projects identified in this category construct new roads or improve existing roads with widening or frontage improvements. • Interchange Circulation Improvements — Improvements to increase capacity and level of service to the following roads crossing US 101 from EI Camino Real to westerly connectors: Santa Barbara Road, Santa Rosa Road, Curbaril Avenue, San Anselmo Avenue and Del Rio Road. • US 101/SR 41 Interchange Improvements — Participate in the California Department of Transportation project to reconstruct the interchange. CATEGORY B: ROAD REHABILITATION PROJECTS Projects identified in this category are intended to restore deteriorated paving surfaces. • Traffic Way Rehabilitation Project — The project includes the rehabilitation of Traffic Way from Olmeda to Via Ave. The project consists of an overlay of the road surface and will tie in the frontage and ADA improvements being done as part of the Sidewalk Improvements at Colony Park. • Road Slope Stabilization Project — The project will stabilize the slope along Santa Cruz Road, near San Gregorio Road. • Road Rehabilitation — 5 Year Maintenance Projects — Road maintenance treatment for circulation roads paved in the past 5-10 years and road that could use these methods for rehabilitation. These road rehabilitation projects will include the slurry sealing or other appropriate treatment and replacement of pavement markings. • Atascadero Avenue Road Rehabilitation — Major Road Rehabilitation project for Atascadero Avenue from Santa Rosa Road to San Diego Road. This road rehabilitation project will include the road resurfacing, minor drainage improvements, pedestrian access improvements and re -striping. • San Andres Road Rehabilitation — Major Road Rehabilitation project for San Andres Road from Morro Road to Santa Lucia Road. This road rehabilitation project will include the road resurfacing, minor drainage improvements, pedestrian access improvements and re -striping. • Santa Rosa Road Rehabilitation —US 101 to Morro Road -Major Road Rehabilitation project for Santa Rosa Road from US 101 to Morro Road. This road rehabilitation project will include the road resurfacing, minor drainage improvements, pedestrian access improvements and re -striping. • El Camino Rehabilitation- Rosario to San Anselmo - Major Road Rehabilitation project for EI Camino Real from Rosario to San Anselmo. This road rehabilitation project will include the grinding and removal of some of the existing road surfacing, repaving and re -striping. • San Fernando Road Rehabilitation Proiect - Major Road Rehabilitation project for San Fernando Road from Graves Creek Road to Balboa Road. This road rehabilitation project will include the road resurfacing, minor drainage improvements, pedestrian access improvements and minor re -striping. • Local Road Paving Proiect - Road Rehabilitation projects for 11 of the worst condition local roads throughout Atascadero. These road rehabilitation projects will include the road resurfacing, minor drainage improvements and replacement of pavement markings. • Minor Street Overlay Projects — Small projects to improve road surfaces through out Atascadero. • Street Maintenance District Project— Minor repairs and maintenance of roads within each maintenance district boundary. • 2006 / 2007 Road Rehabilitation Projects — The project includes the rehabilitation of two separate stretches of road: San Jacinto Road from EI Camino Real to Nogales Avenue and Del Rio Road from EI Camino Real to Chico Road. The project will include pedestrian access improvements and drainage improvements in each area. • 2007/2008 Road Rehabilitation Projects — Projects to rehabilitate the driving surface of roads in the years 2007-2008, based on the Pavement Management System. • 200812009Road Rehabilitation Projects — Projects to rehabilitate the driving surface of roads in the year 2008-2009, based on the City's Pavement Management System and index. • Minor Street Overlay Projects — Small projects to improve road surfaces throughout the City. • Street Maintenance District Project— Minor repairs and maintenance of roads within each maintenance district boundary. • 2009/2010 Road Rehabilitation Proiects — Projects to rehabilitate the driving surface of roads in the year 2009-2010, based on the City's Pavement Management System and index. • 2010/2011 Road Rehabilitation Projects — Projects to rehabilitate the driving surface of roads in the year 2010-2011, based on the City's Pavement Management System and index. • 2011/2012 Road Rehabilitation Projects — Projects to rehabilitate the driving surface of roads in the year 2010-2011, based on the City's Pavement Management System and index. CATEGORY C: BRIDGE PROJECTS Projects identified in this category are for bridge construction, replacement and repair projects. • Lewis Avenue Bridge Project — Construct a landmark bridge across Atascadero Creek at Lewis Avenue for vehicles, pedestrians and bicycles. • Downtown Pedestrian Bridge Project — Design of Downtown Pedestrian Bridge across Atascadero Creek between Colony Square and East Mall. • Santa Lucia Bridge Railing (aLlano Road— Replace bridge railing on Santa Lucia Bridge. • Santa Rosa Bridge Widenings Atascadero Lake — Widen the Santa Rosa Bridge @ Atascadero Lake for vehicular and bicycle access. CATEGORY D: DRAINAGE PROJECTS Projects identified in this category are drainage improvement projects that are intended to reduce flooding potential or improve the existing drainage system. • 2006/2007 Drainage Improvement Program — Design and construction of drainage projects located at Portola Road, Colima Road, San Ramon Road, Santa Lucia Avenue, Monterey Road, Del Rio Road and EI Camino Real. • 2006 Marchant Avenue Drainage Project — Design and construction of drainage project located at Marchant Avenue. • San Jacinto at Traffic Way Drainage Project— Design and construction of drainage enhancement project located at San Jacinto and Traffic Way. • Drainage System Atlas -The Atlas will be used to develop future drainage projects, track drainage facility condition, and provide drainage facility locations. The project consists of hiring a consultant to survey and map the entire city drainage system. The survey will include GPS coordinates of facility locations, dynamic - updateable maps of drainage facilities, drainage facility condition rating; and locations where drainage facilities are needed. • Drainage Enhancement Project - Enhance and improve drainage problems throughout the city. City drainage infrastructure improvements need to be completed in order to alleviate drainage problems throughout the City. The drainage improvements will reduce loses due to flooding • Amapoa Drainage Study- Perform study to improve drainage in the area bounded by Portola, Amapoa and Azucena Roads. CATEGORY E: FACILITIES PROJECTS Projects identified in this category are improvements to public facilities. • Construction of New Corporate Yard — Construction of facilities for relocation of Corporation Yard. • Construction of Colony Park Community Center— This project includes the planning, design, and construction of a 19,000 square foot, concrete and steel framed community center. The Colony Park Community Center will include a full-size gymnasium, teen center, dance room, arts and crafts room, computer lab, cafe, restrooms and kitchen. • Earthquake Repairs — Historic City Hall — Repair of earthquake damage to historic City Hall, including architecture and engineering services, storage of bricks that have fallen from the building, construction bidding and contract negotiation, testing and abatement of mold and pigeon guano, and a portion of construction and construction administration. • CCHE - Historic City Hall Rehabilitation — Construction and rehabilitation of selected elements in Historic City Hall. The project includes deferred maintenance items, rehabilitation relating to historic elements, and life safety system upgrades. • FEMA Administration- City Hall Repairs — The cost associated with hiring consultants and conducting tests in order to verify damage to Historic City Hall. These tests are necessary in order to provide FEMA with necessary documentation and to appeal funding decisions by FEMA. • Programming of Historic City Hall— The costs associated with determining space needs and interior layouts in preparation for the move back into Historic City Hall. CATEGORY F: PARKS PROJECTS Parks projects identified in this category are for repair and enhancement projects. • Lake Park Restroom Access — Renovate Atascadero Lake Park upper restroom to make it ADA accessible. • Santa Rosa Pedestrian Bridge — Replace existing pedestrian bridge on the Lake Park pathway near Santa Rosa Avenue. • Lake Park Parking Lot Renovations — Repair, re -stripe, and repave Pavilion/Park/Zoo parking lot and repair, and re -stripe Lake Park parking lot at Morro Road and Largo. CATEGORY G: MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS Projects identified in this category support multi -modal transportation, routes to school, miscellaneous road repair and advanced studies for future projects. • Downtown Streetscape, Phase 11 — Pedestrian and operational improvements for the Downtown according to the RVC plan. This includes bulb outs, landscaped medians, street furniture, lighting, widening of sidewalk in the Sunken Gardens, pedestrian tunnel improvements and paving of EI Camino Real from Traffic Way to Rosario and from West Mall to Highway 41. • Downtown Underground Utility Project — Undergrounding of overhead utilities in the downtown area. PG & E will be contributing $1.5 million towards the project and the Redevelopment Agency will contribute $160,000 for preliminary work and connections. Road Slope Stabilization Project— Continue funding the design and construction of the Santa Cruz Landslide. The project has moved from the investigation phase to the repair design phase. This landslide is located on Santa Cruz road and threatens to close the road should additional failures occur. The landslide appears to be a combination of rotational failure and mudflow that has occurred along and to the east and north of the pre-existing landslide that was repaired. • Atascadero Ave Ped Access -Morro Road to High School— Improvements to the pedestrian corridor along this stretch of Atascadero Ave. • Santa Lucia Road Multi Purpose Trail — Design and construct multi purpose trail along Santa Lucia Road from Ardilla to Portola Road. • Sidewalk Improvements — Construct access improvements at various locations along the right-of-way in Atascadero. • Downtown Streetscape Improvements, Phase 111- Pedestrian and operational improvements for the Downtown according to the RVC plan. This includes bulb outs, landscaped medians, street furniture, lighting, widening of sidewalk and other improvements. • Historic City Hall Parking Lot Improvements — Improvements and enlarging the Historic City Hall Parking Lot. O L p Y C O O y E •C'C f9 07 K O of4o�0CL V a) n 0 p n 01 N cn C C C C O C N m` O > C E N a) Q T 7 Q V O 3�wL T m a) 6 3 �o�a�ci c O ca m E N m V > U 'O w 7 0W CL E a) & a) Ed V U N ( C N OL C ,O N N O N O ,O O L D.L-..Lw a) C a) N T m.�-• f6 N R C9 S Y N C Lj mEoN C C tm c o o n a a)- w n� c w o n O � D c ON E D C N f0 E t a C a m 0 o c O O v c o O j> E O 10 O j N O CL V 0 O a1 N c D (A V E a) E V V O.0 O != N a) E N N V U O 'O > Q N L OV O 2 N 0 ? asE O n> nc � o O w a N O E E .N.. - w N U V N U a) C In B O- N o N a) C > N C OL N y V O U v no C m `� a o 0 O n C >�> 7 o o n w> o n E E > c 2 N 0 V > C N C N f6 N E OL Op U V M C N O U. U E 'Np '-� V O C~ C O f0 C N D O V N C O N d• a N O O V C C O N m U " fl x cu p O d C N O 7 C N CU N > d 7 «L+ y N> t0 O � O N C r w U f5 0 0 q w O J v r3 N a) tm ami wa} aa) n °' > n � x m T a m a, X n R > o. o O uJ x rs f9 O C a) m O n > N L.O+ O .O+ O J ` Y �_ tm 00 10 W y Ix 0 0 N x 0 d > Oc a >o la N9 o ° Crs 0CmuE-0o m o 0o Zp Jo �n (�> QiU 0mo CL c LL N w o oo AV rs IUD)c" aCN c '� o o = '� d x 0 3 o oy , m IX 'r 3 c 'o_ M M U J W U c y= o rs - O R R a o Q& E a° O :° t O O N N U 2 O p=j pCj 7 O a7 �7 �7 IB ri r3 I— z o E y o 0 d o X �� O �.E o� O O O O N C` O O ¢ m 0 .. . C LL LLQ 2 E � OC y �y Uo o 0 Eic y ia m n cc > m '^ o�n i UUJ2 a(x ch u (U ot aacC�i omo0>m ww.2U)ooaoF-—mCL wcLo Q— 02Q-0 < > 'Fa a-4mmo4) cc oomma ooaS 00 2 o oy .9o 01U)v0o O N'oc o o��— 0amcia0 au 0 U o D'0 mci N m �o m¢ N �'- N md' V C•C N m._ �.-m m.- o_.-.- ai c uL v"i v"i>C7C� oC��a a? mOC7 m$�Q�tLL� o m m� m o f0 �o� m v �? �g�ooc mo�ccv $oU ��m�ccvm=mL'=`O—m ccaUo� o�UU C7=¢¢C7mcnOcncnZ�w�m�mtn�Ucn=U2wcncnwa¢aUww c a •� c E m 0 o c c c oQ �° N .fl rs rs O 0 N rs N W C m ° C rs V C W O° C P3 rs N rs 0 "o o o 0 41 T a.I 7 AI 0 O C13 " es T y� 0 rs Al - 0 W 0 N m c� crc"�.0" c—c�cy c�aoccM cc,M�c�cr cc�m o cy 0uU)awc9MuU)tnInU) U) U)P U)U) U)cn14cn U)atnmUw N m c m m C m N O v a� O _ V N O N Y O v_r EcLi o CD w > > m v > 00 ¢o v�U ¢ON a U1 Q N O T _ O O m cm f4 O C m N = N N 0 2 O «4 _c g E _ O m=E-0c o9m Q) 10—o v ��T3m=W- 3 min vOia��O��O uZ� o RV V)Qm u�i N yCuui��2€ 0 o O c p o o.c m o 0) 2 b m 0 N m 0 M m m o y ��Q o mU o m� O 0 m v-rwQ� o y �Q� a�Q mQtnU�U m N 2 O0fC9OH°00oOmN OmoOmoZ"'=Oy>0000000•c a T�tn E o m c E EU Dom c wa)a �p o>LL1D� m `�"" U moo N o o o o m N O o 0 o t o 0 0,jo y m o o o E u o c c �ocQ��v tummy cmU¢yyoo��i�do;v�`u°�093 : o c c zF �oo�aNimU�VE oU� m�E 000m Z00cn M75 ° @f0LMMMM0 S ��Q cU) U)w0w0O�w>a)J0222U)n.ixacnp¢f-=2=v)v)cna � c v m d d M O c C C ° > > W G Q 'O O O O 4-0 •• o a' a' a' T T T 0 r3 rs E M. o f C C O rs L C C C C C C rs C_ rs rs C G T- - O d C 0 0 7 0 W > E o y w- '�O O ` rs CQ i'i'J C C QU ice+ rs rs 41 m 0 u 0 0 0 U� U c U c 0 V1 c� C c C c c c c a '3 o a N ,� � a � 00 O ______`_ p� `` a_ O d : o f i rs rs rs rs rs Ps y O rs O� rs 1pcy Q' W W W W W W F-W01-F-N!W �� fnafn0M0V) 0V)UJ>0J QaU U rs 0 a' 5; EXHIBIT A: 2007 Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan Spreadsheet CAPITAL PROJECTS Five Year Capital Improvement Plar CATEGORY A: ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Interchange Circulation Improvements I $ 290,000 IS 1,600,000 Is 1,890,000 US 101 / Highway 41 Interchange Improvements 1 400,0001 1 1 1 400,000 CATEGORY B: ROAD REHABILITATION PROJECTS 2006/2007 Road Rehabilitation Project 250,000 660,000 350,000 Santa Lucia Bridge Railing @ Llano Road 35,000 100,000 910,000 Estimated Project Title Proposed Proposed Estimated Estimated Estimated Total for Five 2007.2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Year Period CATEGORY A: ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Interchange Circulation Improvements I $ 290,000 IS 1,600,000 Is 1,890,000 US 101 / Highway 41 Interchange Improvements 1 400,0001 1 1 1 400,000 CATEGORY B: ROAD REHABILITATION PROJECTS 2006/2007 Road Rehabilitation Project 250,000 660,000 350,000 Santa Lucia Bridge Railing @ Llano Road 35,000 100,000 910,000 Traffic Way Road Rehabilitation Project 585,000 Amapoa Drainage Study 80,000 80,000 585,000 Road Slope Stabilization Project 518,500 518,500 Road Rehabiliation- 5 Year Maintenance 50,000 450,000 500,000 Atascadero Avenue Road Rehabilitation 49,500 643,500 693,000 San Andres Road Rehabilitation 50,000 300,000 350,000 Santa Rosa Road Rehabilitation -US 101 to Morro Road 65,000 845,000 910,000 EI Camino Rehabilitation- Rosario to San Anselmo 50,000 650,000 700,000 San Fernando Road Rehabilitation Project 58,500 760,500 819,000 Local Road Paving Projects 126,370 1,400,000 1,526,370 Minor Street Overlay Projects 217,060 291,020 305,000 312,000 320,000 1,445,080 Street Maintenance District Project 57,400 57,400 CATEGORY C: BRIDGE PROJECTS Lewis Avenue Bridge Project 1,586,170 1,586,170 Downtown Pedestrian Bridge Project 100,000 250,000 350,000 Santa Lucia Bridge Railing @ Llano Road 35,000 100,000 135,000 Santa Rosa Road Bridge Widening at Atas Lake 50,000 250,000 300,000 CATEGORY D: DRAINAGE PROJECTS 2006/2007 Drainage Improvement Program 20,000 20,000 2006 Marchant Avenue Drainage Project 348,000 348,000 San Jacinto at Traffic Way Drainage Project 20,000 130,000 150,000 Drainage Enchancement Project 25,000 250,000 275,000 Amapoa Drainage Study 80,000 80,000 EXHIBIT A: 2007 Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan Spreadsheet CAPITAL PROJECTS Five Year Capital Improvement Plar CATEGORY E: FACILITIES PROJECTS New Corporate Yard 370,540 370,540 Colony Park Community Center 4,666,490 4.666,490 Estimated Project Title Proposed Proposed Estimated Estimated Estimated Total for Five 387,600 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Year Period CATEGORY E: FACILITIES PROJECTS New Corporate Yard 370,540 370,540 Colony Park Community Center 4,666,490 4.666,490 Earthquake Repairs- Historic City Hall 900,000 9,740,000 13,902,000 24,542,000 CCHE - Historic City Hall Rehabilitation 240,000 3,760,000 4,000,000 Fire Station #2 Living Quarters Addition 40,000 347,600 387,600 CATEGORY F: PARKS PROJECTS Lake Park Restroom Access 249,720 2,306,200 249,720 Alvord Field Enhancement Project 25.000 125.000 150,000 Lake Park Sign and Frontage Improvements 30,000 240,000 270,000 Zoo Wall and Signage 30,000 240,000 270,000 Zoo Restroom Project 47,000 216,000 263,000 Zoo Entrance Improvement Project 50,000 450,000 500,000 Santa Rosa Pedestrian Bridge 75,000 43,830 75,000 Lake Park Parking Lot Renovation 25,000 100,000 125,000 Paloma Park Playground Project 225,000 220,000 225,000 Colony Park Master Plan Improvements 40,000 380,000 420,000 Paloma Park Improvements 60,000 500,000 560,000 Lake Park Master Plan Improvements Historic City Hall Parking Lot Improvements 50,000 500,000 550,000 CATEGORY G: MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS Downtown Streetscape Improvements II 500,000 2,306,200 2,806,200 Downtown Underground Utility Project 40,000 1,620,000 1,660,000 Sidewalk Improvements at Colony Park 325,850 325,850 Creek Improvements 300,000 500,000 800,000 Parking Improvements 500,000 500,000 Wayfinding Program 43,830 419,770 250,000 713,600 Maiden Statue Renovation 70,000 150,000 220,000 Sidewalk Improvements 35,000 200,000 235,000 Downtown Streetscape Improvements III 100,000 1,400,000 1,500,000 Historic City Hall Parking Lot Improvements 500,000 500,000 EXHIBIT A: 20057 Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan Spreadsheet CAPITAL PROJECTS Five Year Capital Improvement Plar CATEGORY H: WASTEWATER PROJECTS Surge Tank Replacement -Pump Station #1 50,000 50,000 Supervisory Control & Data Acquisition System 25,000 275,000 300,000 Estimated Project Title Proposed Proposed Estimated Estimated Estimated Total for Five 500,000 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Year Period CATEGORY H: WASTEWATER PROJECTS Surge Tank Replacement -Pump Station #1 50,000 50,000 Supervisory Control & Data Acquisition System 25,000 275,000 300,000 Treatment Plant Road Repairs 60,000 60,000 Pump Station #11 Upgrade Project 35,000 35,000 Lift Station # 5 Relocation 500,000 500,000 Pump Sation Odor Control 75,000 75,000 Treatment Plant Fencing 44,000 44,000 ECR Sewer Main Replacement -at Del Rio Road 90,000 780,000 870,000 Lft Station # 6 Renovation 50,000 250,000 300,000 $ 13,234,560 $ 23,045,090 $ 16,784,000 S 7,108,870 S 2,300,000 $ 63,667,520 ITEM NUMBER: 4 DATE: 6-5-07 Atascadero Planning Commission Staff Report — Community Development Department PLN 2006-1119 Tentative Parcel Map 2006-0084 7155 Valle Ave. (Knoph) SUBJECT: The proposed project includes a Tentative Parcel Map which proposes a two lot split in the RSF-Y Zone (1 acre minimum lot size.) The existing lot is 2.33 acres gross (2.009 acres net) with an average slope of 33%. Proposed Parcel 2 (which contains an existing residence) is proposed at 1.33 acres. Parcel 1 is proposed at 1.0 acres and includes a building envelope for one new residence. An emergency access easement is proposed on Parcel 1 to give a secondary emergency access route to Stadium Park. The project proposal includes the removal of 2 Live Oaks (58" total DBH) and 3 Blue Oaks (63" total DBH) for the construction of the new residence, driveway, and emergency access road on proposed Parcel 1. The project will also include street improvements on Valle and Escarpa Ave. RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends: The Planning Commission adopt Resolution PC 2007-0050 certifying the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-0008, approving the removal of 2 Live Oaks and 3 Blue Oaks, and approving Tentative Parcel Map 2006-0084 (AT 06-0047), a request to subdivide one lot totaling 2.33 gross acres into two (2) parcels containing 1.0 acres and 1.333 acres each, based on findings and subject to conditions. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Owners: Sean Knoph, Greg Wright and Lori Martin 6590 Valle Ave, Atascadero, CA 93422 2. Project Address: 7155 Valle Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422 APN # 029-352-001 3. General Plan Designation: Single Family Residential (SFR -Y) \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER: 4 DATE: 6-5-07 4. Zoning District: Residential Single Family (RSF-Y) (one -acre min) 5. Site Area: 2.33 acres 6. Existing Use: One existing residence 7. Environmental Status: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration posted May 16, 2007 - June 4, 2007. DISCUSSION: Background The site contains one existing residence on Valle Avenue. The lower portion of the site has historically been used as a secondary emergency access route to Stadium Park, which is located to the north of the subject site. Surrounding parcels are zoned RSF-Y with one acre minimum lot sizes. Stadium Park e i` Project Site 7155 Valle RSF- / \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc .�• .tom„ �� .�;ry�' 'v 'v'+, �.�r ' � ,�,g rq �" r' �, �-'•`Mtn*�,"� ".fit .� s'Tl w �� rt_. i�`a..,-: h'" } 1 I ` ITEM NUMBER: 4 DATE: 6-5-07 Subdivision Design The proposed Tentative Parcel Map is a two lot split in the RSF-Y zone (1 acre minimum lot size.) Parcel 2 (which contains an existing residence) is proposed at 1.333 acres gross with a 25% slope. Parcel 1 is proposed at 1.0 acres gross on a 43% slope. Both lots meet the minimum acreage for a lot split in the RSF-Y zone. The proposed improvements on the site will be confined to Parcel 1 where a new single- family residence and an access road to Stadium Park are proposed. The Tentative Parcel Map has identified an adequate building site for the new residence which avoids most of the trees and steep slopes located on the site. While the average slope of the entire lot would be 43%, the 11,700 square foot building envelope would have an average slope of 10.6%, and would be accessed off the proposed driveway on Valle Avenue. An emergency access easement is proposed on Parcel 1 to give a secondary emergency access route to Stadium Park. The 20 -foot wide emergency access easement shall be dedicated with the recordation of the Final Parcel Map. A 16 -foot wide paved road shall be installed by the property owner at the time of building permits. The road shall be designed with a slope of less than 20% and shall be located along the driveway of the proposed residence. Proposed Parcel 2: 1.333 gross acres Proposed Parcel 1: 25% slope 1.0 gross acres Contains Existing Residence 43% slope 10.6% slope building envelope 2 r, � 0 Proposed Tentative Parcel Map 2006-0084 & Grading Plan \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER: 4 DATE: 6-5-07 rrse.r. '. 10�• " C '� 3 PR6PC 4 /' *' .• . NfONG T.RER LEGEND _ ` i 1 - CA1 iFFf lr 'fi' Sr.Y'rL"M r'R'A'k. 1 0 s,NGLE TP )Nk KI TRIJ171i Emergency access 1RUf1k S,r£ E:9EL road to Stadium Park cES SHOW1 ARE L"E PAKS UN OiHERYASE SIZE LARCL REPR WLyp I h l�r.f/ 01AUEIEP AT CHEST HEIGHT {�• ll �__1 Y. r .. LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE �,DIA.9II� 1I* 9 K •� lilt- 3�p4�G A PKPC 1 -A6Ptl1�pA10xt�jlGl'��'�•`�a�u'f1 ! y� �{�J4.I Y/�l�l � ��' p" y �i �,°�I k `-. - '� p� (yz-"�rky-�`5��•� y. II I �l f f ! f f �� dA��l��• �I� ll h 3 F.r '�0.YL'4�y tl rt s/ V Ilii "Il Rr, 00" LK � 5 OAK le• ` I � yi,F } rJG� ,; (% I�io ' Cwt { iy �`t�au{ ~ I l qty i j i S II ifdi�TJEia" r. lcK rF Igctl^' r Ff=Fw �, + ! � � l,r'�°�� ° �� I ,fit �� _ ,�,. oAr: I • r r�. �, .l 3 - a � >•+`"/ f '"'--�` j �`��' SAK OAK j"i + r�vz�e �R aex ra /% s !1 rOw,An=rvrv_ __ « ! A 414 KI titin'} r- .O 25y F'i w 1 b- � 4 � � ELEY. 1Q57.d5.3 •RCRG � f _" �� f / T.rs 9�P•�A� - =— 9 oAx24. 4°Maim ✓ /f' r s 4 Mb "sb urr , .x ti. , � /tr IAPN 029-35-5-00 `R _Eb ERNEST A 5255 ESC .APPA AvEr, PARCEL PM 15 ANON 029-353 u('4 r oPI 1 oQPh�JL� R cow*,'IR 'ERlrOk M ARNOLE� FANAll1' DOWN N�[N 171 VALI E .AVENI. C �'/ ` "','f{A' ~-•Q�' S19P� 1G:� / tl ' n+19fi1451' ZO' 1U'0 ID r= 2o F:' � SR AL,E I_1t .: rrnr EWER �pa2. N T,e7R,25-74; tail i:UNTO!VR AA`±F.R .. MUM l•RD' " HIPC. OPEN, aWC f7lR L 6 1 G!{! . f {R1 Urjv DOWN Is _-_- R p+ rltsAloS) /�6TESS� „ kk 1 ruA l Lr na,Irb rai.Ill�/hrdVln� Alf 1 Ei[v.•Io.S6A`4!r/iQti . R c^y. r�� {fdpilRr r< 4'6!![ Proposed Lot 1: Grading Plan Detail \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER: 4 DATE: 6-5-07 Native Trees The site is covered by both Coast Live Oaks and Blue Oaks. An Arborist Report has been provided which identifies native tree impacts. Tree protection fencing and arborist monitoring shall be required. The project proposal includes the removal of 2 Live Oaks (58" total DBH) and 3 Blue Oaks (63" total DBH) for the construction of the new residence, driveway, and emergency access road on proposed Parcel 1. In addition, tree 9 and tree 10 will be impacted approximately 50%. Tree mitigation fees shall be paid for the removed trees and bonds shall be required for trees 9 and 10. Bonds may be refunded one year after the completion of the residence if an Arborist Report is submitted to the City to verify that the trees are in good health and were able to survive the construction. Tree Removal Mitigation Fees: $1,533.33 Evergreen Native Trees (inches) dbh notes 1 29 -inches LO Tree #5 2 29 -inches LO Tree #15 Total 58 -inches Mitigation Requirement Tree Fund Payment: $ 483.33 Bonds for Trees 9 & 10: $1.083.33 Evergreen Native Trees (inches) dbh notes Total 0 -inches Mitigation Requirement Deciduous Native Trees (inches) Tree Fund Payment: $ 1,050.00 Deciduous Native Trees (inches) dbh notes 1 30 -inches B0 Tree #9 2 35 -inches BO Tree #10 Total 65 -inches Tree Fund Payment: $ Tree Fund Payment: $ 1,083.33 \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc Totals 121 -inches $ 1,533.33 Totals 65 -inches $ 1,083.33 dbh notes 1 16 -inches BO Tree #6 2 32 -inches BO Tree #8 3 15 -inches BO Tree #16 Total 63 -inches Tree Fund Payment: $ 1,050.00 Deciduous Native Trees (inches) dbh notes 1 30 -inches B0 Tree #9 2 35 -inches BO Tree #10 Total 65 -inches Tree Fund Payment: $ Tree Fund Payment: $ 1,083.33 \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc Totals 121 -inches $ 1,533.33 Totals 65 -inches $ 1,083.33 ITEM NUMBER: 4 DATE: 6-5-07 Public Improvements: The City Engineer has conditioned that the applicant improve Valle Avenue and Escarpa Avenue as shown on the conceptual grading plan. Escarpa shall be widened to 15 -feet with a transition to 20 -feet wide at the Valle Intersection. Valle Avenue shall be widened to 20 -foot minimum width. The applicant shall connect to the City sewer system as shown on the conceptual grading plan submitted with the Tentative Map. Atascadero Mutual Water Company will provide water to the new residence, and future utilities to the new lot will be required to be placed underground. Environmental Review: A Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is attached to this report for the Planning Commission review. The Initial Study concluded there would be no significant harm to the environment as a result of this subdivision. A proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project and certification of the Mitigated Negative Declaration is included in draft Planning Commission Resolution 2007-0050. General Plan : Staff has reviewed the project with the 2002 General Plan Land Use, Open Space, and Conservation Goals, Policies, and Programs and has noted the following: • Policy 1.1 Program 2: Concentrate higher density development downtown and within the Urban Core • Policy 7.1 Program 4: Require lot line adjustments and tentative subdivision maps on site with 25 percent or greater native tree canopy cover to establish locations of building sites, driveways and leach fields that will minimize native tree impacts. • Policy 15.1: Growth should be directed to areas where services can be provided in a cost effective manner. The project location is just south of Highway 41 East near EI Camino Real. A building envelope is provided on a slope of 10.6% and in a location which limits tree removals. City sewer services are provided. CONCLUSIONS: The subdivision is consistent with the 2002 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The parcel configurations are consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance requirements and the size and shape of the proposed lots are consistent with the character of the \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER: 4 DATE: 6-5-07 immediate neighborhood. If approved, the project would allow for the construction of one additional single-family residence. Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the Tentative Parcel Map as conditioned. ALTERNATIVES: 1. The Commission may approve the subdivision subject to additional or revised project conditions. The Commission's motion to approve needs to include any new or revised project conditions. 2. The Commission may deny the subdivision if it is found to be inconsistent with the General Plan or any of the other required findings. The Commission's motion to deny must include a finding basis for denial. 3. The Commission may continue the hearing and refer the item back to staff for additional information or analysis. Direction should be given to staff and the applicant on required information. PREPARED BY: Callie Taylor, Assistant Planner ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Location Map (General Plan & Zoning) Attachment 2 — Aerial Photo Attachment 3 — Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Attachment 4 — Arborist Report Attachment 5 — Draft Resolution PC 2007-0050 \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER: 4 DATE: 6-5-07 ATTACHMENT 1: Location Map (General Plan / Zoning) TPM 2006-0084 7155 Valle Ave. ,w 1W oil Sddtadium��. Zone: Residential Single Family - 1 acre minimum (RSF-Y) Land Use Designation: Single Family Residential - 1 acre minimum (SFR -Y) \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 ATTACHMENT 2: Aerial Photo 7155 Valle Avenue \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 ATTACHMENT 3: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration See Following \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER: 4 DATE: 6-5-07 ATTACHMENT 4: Arborist Report 2-13-07 Knoph Residence Tentative Parcel Map 06-0047 7155 Valle Atascadero, California I -his tree protection plan is in regard to the vacant land located at the corner of Valle and Escarps in Atascadero, California. The lot is located in a small valley with both coast live oaks (Quercus agrifblia) and blue oaks (Quercus douglasrr). A paved emergency access to Stadium Park will be located on the property. This access will impact four trees approximately 45-50%. All four trees will have a small gravity block wall to retain soil from the tree trunks. All will probably survive as long as the grading for the driveway/access road is no deeper than eight inches within the drip line. The total diameter of these trees is 126 inches. Trees #15 and #16 will have to be removed for the home. Their diameter is a combined 44 inches. Utilities shall be routed down the driveway. Many trees require monitoring during the construction phase. It is the responsibility of the owner to provide a copy of this tree protection plan to any and all contractors and subs that work within the drip line of any native tree. It is highly recommended that each contractor sign and acknowledge this tree protection plan. This project shalt require an on-site pre -construction meeting with the city, owner, gradin; contractor and the arborist. Topics will include fencing, monitoring and requirements for a positive final occupancy letter. All trees potentially impacted by this project are numbered and identified on both the grading plan and the spreadsheet. Trees are numbered on the grading pians and in the field with an aluminum tag. Tree protection fencing is shown on the grading plan. In the field, trees to be saved have yellow tape and trees to be removed have red tape. Tree Rating System A rating system of 1-10 was used for visually establishing the overall condition of each tree on the spreadsheet. The rating system is defined as follows: Ratln Condition 0 Deceased Evidence of massive past failures, extreme disease and is in severe decline. 2 May be saved with attention to class 4 pruning, insect/pest eradication and future monitoring. \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER: 4 DATE: 6-5-07 3 Some past failures, some pests or structural defects that may be mitigated by class IV pruning. 4 May have had minor past failures, excessive deadwood or minor structural defects that can be mitigated with pruning. 5 Relatively healthy tree with little visual structural and or pest defects. 6 Healthy tree that probably can be left in its natural state. 7-9 Have had proper arboricultural pruning and attention or have no apparent structural defects. 10 Specimen tree with perfect shape, structure and foliage in a protected setting (i.e. park, arboretum). The following mitigation measures/mcthods must be fully understood and followed by anyone working within the drip line of any native tree. Any necessary clarification will be provided by us (the arborists) upon request. 1. Fencing: The proposed fencing shall be shown in orange ink on the grading plan. It must be a minimum of 4' high chain link, snow or safety fence staked at the edge of the drip line or line of encroachment for each tree or group of trees. The fence shall be up before any construction or earth moving begins. The owner shall be responsible for maintaining an erect fence throughout the construction period. The arborist(s), upon notification, will inspect the fence placement once it is erected. After this time, fencing shall not be moved without arborist inspection/approval. If the orange plastic fencing is used, a minimum of four zip ties shall be used on each stake to secure the fence. All efforts shall be made to maximize the distance from each saved tree. The fencing must be constructed prior to the city pre -construction meeting for inspection by the city and the arborists. 2. Soil Aeration Methods: Soils within the drip line that have been compacted by heavy equipment and/or construction activities must be returned to their original state before all work is completed. Methods include water jetting, adding organic matter, and boring small holes with an auger (18" deep, 2-3' apart with a 24" auger) and the application of moderate amounts of nitrogen fertilizer. The arborist(s) shall advise. 3. Chip Mulch: All areas within the drip line of the trees that cannot be fenced shall receive a 4-6" layer of chip mulch to retain moisture, soil structure and reduce the effects of soil compaction. 4. Trenching Within Drip Line: All trenching for foundations within the drip line of native trees shall be hand dug. All major roots shall be avoided whenever possible. All exposed roots larger than I " in diameter shall be clean cut with sharp pruning tools and not left ragged. A Mandatory meeting between the arborists and grading/trenching contractor(s) shall take place prior to work start. This activity shall be monitored by the arborist(s) to insure proper root pruning is talking place. 5. Grading Within The Drip Line: Grading should not encroach within the drip line unless authorized. Grading should not disrupt the normal drainage pattern around the trees. Fills should not create a ponding condition and excavations should not leave the tree on a rapidly draining mound. \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER: 4 DATE: 6-5-07 6. Exposed Roots: Any exposed roots shall be re-covered the same day they were exposed. If they cannot, they must be covered with burlap or another suitable material and wetted down 2x per day until re -buried. 7. Equipment Operation: Vehicles and all heavy equipment shall not be driven under the trees, as this will contribute to soil compaction. Also there is to be no parking of equipment or personal vehicles in these areas. All areas behind fencing are off limits unless pre -approved by the arborist. 8. Existing Surfaces: The existing ground surface within the drip line of all native trees shall not be cut, filled, compacted or pared, unless shown on the grading plans and approved by the arborist. 9. Construction Materials And Waste: No liquid or solid construction waste shall be dumped on the ground within the drip line of any native tree. The drip line areas are not for storage of materials either. 10. Arborist Monitoring: An arborist shall be present for selected activities (trees identified on spreadsheet and items bulleted below). The monitoring does not necessarily have to be continuous but observational at times during these activities. It is the responsibility of the owner(s) or their designee to inform us prior to these events so we can make arrangements to be present. It is the responsibility of the owner to contract (prior to construction) a locally licensed and insured arborist that will document all monitoring activities. • pre -construction fence placement • any utility or drainage trenching within any drip line • All grading and trenching near trees requiring monitoring on the spreadsheet 11. Pre -Construction Meeting: An on-site pre -construction meeting with the Arborist(s), Owner(s), Planning Staff, and the earth moving team shall be required for this project. Prior to final occupancy, a letter from the arborist(s) shall be required verifying the hcalth/condition of all impacted trees and providing any recommendations for any additional mitigation. The letter shall verify that the arborist(s) were on site for all grading and/or trenching activity that encroached into the drip line of the selected native trees. and that all work done in these areas was completed to the standards set forth above. 12. Pruning: Class 4 pruning includes -Crown reduction pruning shall consist of reduction of tops, sides or individual limbs. A trained arborist shall perform all pruning. No pruning shall take more than 25% of the live crown of any native tree. Any trees that may need pruning for road/home clearance shall be pruned prior to any grading activities to avoid any branch tearing. 13. Landscape: All landscape under the drip -line shall be drought tolerant or native varieties. Lawns shall be avoided. All irrigation trenching shall be routed around drip \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER: 4 DATE: 6-5-07 lines; otherwise above ground drip -irrigation shall be used. It is the owner's responsibility to notify the landscape contractor regarding this mitigation. 14. Utility Placement: All utilities and sewer/storm drains shall be placed down the roads/driveways and when possible outside of the drip lines. The arborist shall supervise trenching within the drip line. All trenches in these areas shall be exposed by air spade or hand dug with utilities routed under/over the roots. Roots greater than 2 inches in diameter shall not be cut. 15. Fertilization and Cultural Practices: As the project moves toward completion, the arborist(s) may suggest either fertilization and/or mycorrhiza applications that will benefit tree health. Mycorrhiza offers several benefits to the host plant, including faster growth, improved nutrition, greater drought resistance, and protection from pathogens. The included spreadsheet includes trees listed by number, species and multiple stems if applicable, diameter and breast height (4.5'), condition (scale from poor to excellent), status (avoided, impacted, removed, exempt), percent of drip line impacted, mitigation required (fencing, root pruning, monitoring), construction impact (trenching, grading), recommended pruning and individual tree notes. If all the above mitigation measures are followed, we feel there will be no additional long-term significant impacts to the remaining native trees. A &. T Arborists strongly suggests that the responsible party (owner of their designee) make copies of this report. Any reproduction by A & T Arborists or changes to this original report will require an additional charge. Please let us know if we can be of any future assistance to you for this project Steven G. Alvarez Certified Arborist #WC 0511 Chip Tamagni Certified Arbo 'st #WE 6436-A \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc r r Of 0) O LL l, -- w w W = Q O Q 00 Qw W J J Z Ln OLLI ti Ud F- O O � Y 0 w w W) 0 M N T— ITEM NUMBER: 4 DATE: \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc 6-5-07 z z _ D U z 4 mo 0 z M o Z � z U � a 00 0 Z O 0 0 pz L7 w Q U ' O j Y }W O co ~ Z K U 0a 0 w 3 Z j O Z t O K ZO r m ° w Or m r QrQ w Z Z U o. O CO CW OU L Q G LL , m a, O _ � r ¢ O r 0 „ _ Z W � s W � u U 0 O W LL w O K 0 Y Z tD a U Z 'v 0oPJ� U 0: z o 1:� O y U w O iti Q Z a Y O J WZ W W W> W W K 0: Q r r r r a LLI ~ U Z -_ Q d wO W i -LZ Z J Q U m Z U 1-- � Q � Q m d U U Z rn W W W W W W W LLJ W LLJ w W LLI W W W w z Q Z Z Z Z� Z Z Z�,Q Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z =)<-i0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wo Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z O z LLJ 25 00 00 0 0 0 0 Un Cn w w Un w (n (n zLLJ LLJ z (JO Un O� W LLJ W W W W W LLJ LLJ LLJ 0 LLI 0 LLJ LLJ w W Ci >- >- >- >- ?- >- ?- >- >- >- Z Z >- Z >- >- Z Z >- >- W Z J Q O - - � Z Z Z Z Z.- U' a0 LL LL LL LL LL U LL LL O O LL LL LL O O LL. LL_ Z Z Z Z Z LLILL ga U) V W W W F- LLJ W W Z a U U U U U U U U U U Z Z U Z U U Z Z Z O 0 0 0 O O O C� 0 0 0 0 CD CD 0 C7 0 0 C3 Ur. (D W F- Z J Q \ o \ 0 O 0 O 0 o \ o 0'o 0 0 " 0 O \ O o o o O \ O O 0 O 0 0 0 - LL a 2 T o Ln Ln O o � CD oO o o Ln o 0 O 0 O O o o �o �D 0O a - - - - � C d - � Q Q - - Q cr- Q Q Q - U ~ N O W NW w p V [7' [t Lo qC7 N V ;T V' V' N (n rt q 't'q- N ~O L) Y= N co M 00 N O (D O CV It (3) 0 LO N O LO — N O CA Ln CA 00 Lo N 0 X X X N �- C O CO C O � X X � N �- �- X N N CY) N N M (0 to U.1 LJ- LLJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W J J J J J m m m m m m m m m J m m J J J IL LLJ w t r N M Co ti 00 Q� C `-' N M S LA w ti 00 c) O �— �— N H \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc 6-5-07 z z _ D U z 4 mo 0 z M o Z � z U � a 00 0 Z O 0 0 pz L7 w Q U ' O j Y }W O co ~ Z K U 0a 0 w 3 Z j O Z t O K ZO r m ° w Or m r QrQ w Z Z U o. O CO CW OU L Q G LL , m a, O _ � r ¢ O r 0 „ _ Z W � s W � u U 0 O W LL w O K 0 Y Z tD a U Z 'v 0oPJ� U 0: z o 1:� O y U w O iti Q Z a Y O J WZ W W W> W W K 0: Q r r r r a ITEM NUMBER: 4 DATE: 6-5-07 `.• U It trLK' p - ._ ' i s, LRrf 70 �iiApruN{ 13r g G SILtTP.UrI'r cLE C- c• AAt PRnNd S' dAR ! 2t .spy„6.. r_1r MULTIPLE 19I.1- OAKI dip 12' TRUNK SIZE L;.... ;lal r IE 1 4 I K'I OAr!- ��_ � �.�/. a7 w66y3L-/� rJbT£ Sit 6' SpiYF AF' f+ R rp!rvi y ALL TREE^ SainMR1 ARE E'. _i� NpTEEI S?iHEP.w15E SIZE -(TOSiW1 rr.� 6 .4 ;tii q If _ TRU"K WWFTER AT 'HE._ nxA Elr4 If/jy.5l, - LGLATrgNS ARE y ' S GJU 4 I rf GF r; y;' 7 PR4N4 1 A•,�- Gni Li ! 1 hRGrlr I 11 r� ow'�} T3yE1 ! JO•�B=.I. 3,rkrra,T OAK %A- f sFK04l4aG+ tour* 1,12' "I PIPE, T'ErONO N .$I DAK I an .'!� - � � r r1C� �. G Fq+'? � 6' a k *awr 1.S' a I SII I'f I� �f�� IOA _ Ra OA "Lid-OAx4 F to BAv. 1' •,p�<T�) 1 7P a RONO 0 AK 3' S a.' OAK G75 �l f'Af1-i6'7D. y�: �,• + 1 SCF 60� $FAKE I Mp�l• //�,I ,r 1r F*R iR a� i Ip.e Ct li 6.,r✓Ay' -+,�f,. � •`a _..1 1 '3 FROND !�. y6 FyCT `. ,'r , 'L i1 r L I 2A 19i i 1y IV's hOAK � 711% � _� fi 1 J F:, s4 ' APN029- �s ERNEST ., 5255 ESCARF X PARCEL 16 PM I -�-'•�_.- =-- nF/ �. - - P ,✓ %'� - u�,,. +°CPN {}29—.��51._., . taWiv � ! ver a?EN"R I RLICE M ARNOLD FAMiL 7171 VALLE AVEN �r� Q s1r 1 ` pC511061 row r E a a`' EEE>' _rwase' 20, Tu' n �. ✓- c �nx SCALE 1"= 20' 71-028 N Gtr r Y 3s a 25 35, (1a) �'Ti� ,� EER -W n I R BCIi•00' E 25.50 {R'y CONTOUR laYi'£Rr'dL = „�+ e�' {� SF3b'Si" F 75.5+1` {Rtj 1 L. ENCLANC o� 1' ?dtJE v�1 i FOIOs 1' 1RlM+ y L�stOlc1G (/:°M Oz.OPE!a grfC eFftJR Tree Protection Plan \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER: 4 DATE: 6-5-07 ATTACHMENT 5: Draft Resolution PC 2007-0050 TPM 2006-0084, 7155 Valle Avenue DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. PC 2007-0050 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING PLN 2006-1119 / TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2006-0084 (AT 06-0047), ESTABLISHING A SUBDIVISION OF ONE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL LOT INTO TWO PARCELS 7155 VALLE AVENUE (KNOPH) WHEREAS, an application was received from Sean Knoph, 6590 Valle Ave, Atascadero, CA 93422, and Greg Wright and Lori Martin, 6590 Valle Ave, Atascadero, CA 93422 (Owners/Applicants), for a Tentative Parcel Map to establish a subdivision of an existing 2.33 acre lot into two (2) lots containing 1.0 acres and 1.33 acres gross each; and, WHEREAS, the proposed project has a General Plan Designation of Single Family Residential, minimum lot size 1 acre (SFR -Y) and is in conformance with the Land Use Element of the General Plan and all other applicable General Plan policies; and, WHEREAS, the site is located in the Residential Single Family, minimum lot size 1 acre (RSF-Y) which allows for the proposed use and density when certain findings are made; and, WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-0008 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the proposed Tentative Parcel Map application on June 5, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. and considered testimony and reports from staff, the applicants, and the public. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission takes the following actions: SECTION 1. Certification of Negative Declaration. The Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, hereby certifies Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-0008 based on the following findings: 1. The Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act; and, 2. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment; and \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER: 4 DATE: 6-5-07 3. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals; and, 4. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable; and, 5. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. SECTION 2. Approval for Tentative Parcel Map, the Planning Commission finds as follows: 1. The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements. 2. The design and improvement, as conditioned, of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements. 3. The site is physically suitable for the density of development proposed. 4. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. 5. The subdivision is consistent with the character of the immediate neighborhood. 6. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through, or the use of property within, the proposed subdivision; or substantially equivalent alternative easements are provided. 7. The proposed subdivision design and type of improvements proposed will not cause serious public health problems. 8. The proposed subdivision will be accomplished without detriment to the adjacent properties. SECTION 3. Findings for tree removal. The Planning Commission finds as follows: 1. The tree is obstructing proposed improvements that cannot be reasonably designed to avoid the need for tree removal, as certified by a report from the Site Planner and determined by the Community Development Department based on the following factors: • Early consultation with the City; • Consideration of practical design alternatives; • Provision of cost comparisons (from applicant) for practical design alternatives; • If saving tree eliminates all reasonable uses of the property; or • If saving the tree requires the removal of more desirable trees. \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER: 4 DATE: 6-5-07 SECTION 4. Approval. The Planning Commission does hereby approve Tentative Parcel Map 2006-0084 to establish a subdivision of an existing 2.33 gross acre lot into two (2) lots containing 1.0 acres and 1.33 acres net each, subject to the following Conditions and Exhibits: EXHIBIT A: Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-0008 EXHIBIT B: Conditions of Approval EXHIBIT C: Tentative Parcel Map 2006-0084 (AT 06-0047) On motion by Commissioner and seconded by Commissioner , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: ( ) NOES: ( ) ABSENT: ( ) ADOPTED: ABSTAINED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA Joan O'Keefe Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Warren Frace Planning Commission Secretary \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER: 4 DATE: 6-5-07 EXHIBIT A: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-0008 TPM 2006-0084 / PLN 2006-1119 CITY OF ATASCADERO M v P EW rul» is It /•7• Fzz, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT sY DctH'N CITY OF ATASCADERO NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Atascadero Planning Commission will be holding a public hearing to consider the following project and environmental determination. The public is encouraged to attend. Applicant: Scan Knoph 6590 Valle Ave, Atascadcro, CA 93422 Owner, Sean Knoph 6590 Valle Ave, Atascadero, CA 93422 Greg Wright and Lori Martin, 6590 Valle Ave, Atascadero, CA 93422 Project Title: PLN 2006-1119 t TPM 2006-0084 Project 7155 Valle Ave, Atascadero, CA 93422 Location: APN 029-352-001 Project The proposed project is located at the comer of Valle Avenue and Fscarpa Avenue. The project Description: includes a Tentative Parcel Map which proposes a two lot split in the RSF-Y zone (I acre minimum lot size.) The existing lot is 2.33 acres gross (2.009 acres net) with an average slope of 33%. Proposed Parcel I (which contains an existing residence) is proposed at 1 acre gross with a 43% slope. Parcel 2 is proposed at 1.333 acres on a 25% slope. A building envelope with less than 20% slope is provided on Parcel 2 for one new residence: the site is currcntly vacant. An emergency access casement is proposed on Parcel 2 to give a secondary emergency access route to Stadium Park. The site is covered by both Coast Live Oaks and Blue Oaks. The project proposal includes the removal of two Live Oaks (58" total DBI I) and three Blue Oaks (63" total DBH) for the construction of the new residence, driveway. and emergency access road on proposed Parcel 2. The project will also include street improvements on Valle and Escarpa Ave. General Plan Designation: Single Family Residential (SFR -Y) Zoning District: Residential Single Family (RSF-Y) Environmental Begins: May 16, 2007 Review Dates: Finds: June 4, 2007 Hearing Date: June 5, 2007 Hearing City Hall, Council Chambers; 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 Location: Proposed Based on the initial study prepared for the project, a Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental is proposed. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for public Determination: review from 5/16107 through 6/4/07 at 6907 EI Camino Real, Community Development Department, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Any Interested person may review the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and project f les. Questions should be directed to Callie ravlor, Assistant Planner at 461-5000, est 3448. Community Development Deputy Director RY k a..)u'Mh)<Md 6907 EL CAMINO REAL • ATASCADERO, CA 93422 • (805) 461-5000 • FAX 461-7612 \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 EXHIBIT B: Conditions of Approval / Mitigation Monitoring TPM 2006-0084 Conditions Of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure TPM 2006-0084 / PLN 2006-1119 PS: Planning Services BL: Business License BS: Building Services Address: 7155 Valle Avenue GP: Grading Permit BP: Building Permit FD: Fire Department PD: Police Department FI: Final Inspection CE: City Engineer TO: Temporary WW: Wastewater Occupancy CA: City Attorney F0: Final Occupancy Standard Planning Conditions 1. The approval of this application shall become final, subject to the FM PS completion of the conditions of approval, fourteen (14) days following the Planning Commission approval unless prior to the time, an appeal to the decision is filed as set forth in Section 9- 1.111(b) of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall be valid for two years FM PS after its effective date. At the end of the period, the approval shall expire and become null and void unless a final map has been recorded or an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request received prior to the expiration date. 3. The Community Development Department shall have the authority FM PS to approve minor changes to the project that (1) result in a superior site design or appearance, and/or (2) address a construction design issue that is not substantive to the Tentative Parcel Map. 4. A parcel map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved FM PS tentative map, and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein, shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 5. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City Ongoing CA of Atascadero or its agents, officers, and employees against any claim or action brought to challenge an approval by the city, or any of its entities, concerning the subdivision. 6. The parcel map shall be subject to additional fees for park or FM PS recreation purposes (QUIMBY Act) as required by City Ordinance. Project Planning Conditions 7. Each lot shall have yards as required by the zoning regulations, FM PS including a ten (10) foot setback along any accessway, whether easement or lot line. 8. Prior to issuance of construction permits all tree mitigation fees GP/BP PS shall be paid \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 Conditions Of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure TPM 2006-0084 / PLN 2006-1119 PS: Planning Services BL: Business License BS: Building Services Address: 7155 Valle Avenue GP: Grading Permit BP: Building Permit FD: Fire Department PD: Police Department FI: Final Inspection CE: City Engineer TO: Temporary WW: Wastewater Occupancy CA: City Attorney F0: Final Occupancy 9. All recommendations and tree protection measures, as outlined GP/FM BS/PS in the Tree Protection Report, prepared by A&T Arborists shall be implemented prior to and during all construction activity on the project site. 10. All utilities shall be located within roadways and driveways and GP/BP PS/BS outside the driplines of native trees. City Engineer Project Conditions 11. The applicant shall connect to the City sewer system as GP, BP CE shown on the conceptual grading plan submitted with the Tentative Map. 12. The applicant shall improve Valle Avenue as shown on the FM CE conceptual grading plan submitted with the Tentative Map. 13. The applicant shall improve Escarpa Avenue as shown on FM CE the conceptual grading plan submitted with the Tentative Map. 14. The parcel map shall include a deed restriction on current FM CE and future owners that the proposed paved emergency access road to Stadium Park shall be completed prior to issuance of building permits City Engineer Standard Conditions 15. In the event that the applicant bonds for the public GP, BP CE improvements required as a condition of this map, the applicant shall enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City Council. 16. An engineer's estimate of probable cost shall be submitted GP, BP CE for review and approval by the City Engineer to determine the amount of the bond. 17. The Subdivision Improvement Agreement shall record FM CE concurrently with the parcel map. 18. A six (6) foot Public Utility Easement (PUE) shall be GP, BP CE provided contiguous to the property frontage. 19. The applicant shall acquire title interest in any off-site land GP, BP CE that may be required to allow for the construction of the improvements. The applicant shall bear all costs associated with the necessary acquisitions. The applicant shall also gain concurrence from all adjacent property owners whose \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 Conditions Of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure TPM 2006-0084 / PLN 2006-1119 PS: Planning Services BL: Business License BS: Building Services Address: 7155 Valle Avenue GP: Grading Permit BP: Building Permit FD: Fire Department PD: Police Department FI: Final Inspection CE: City Engineer TO: Temporary WW: Wastewater Occupancy CA: City Attorney F0: Final Occupancy ingress and egress is affected by these improvements. 20. Slope easements shall be obtained by the applicant as GP, BP CE needed to accommodate cut or fill slopes. 21. Drainage easements shall be obtained by the applicant as GP, BP CE needed to accommodate both public and private drainage facilities. 22. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for FM CE review in conjunction with the processing of the parcel map. 23. The parcel map shall be signed by the City Engineer prior to FM CE the map being placed on the agenda for City Council acceptance. 24. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall pay all FM CE outstanding plan check/inspection fees. 25. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall bond FM CE for or complete all improvements required by these conditions of approval. 26. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall submit FM CE a copy of a valid tax bond. 27. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall bond FM CE for or set monuments at all new property corners. A registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate by certificate on the parcel map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. 28. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall submit FM CE a map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein. The map shall be submitted for review and approval by the City in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 29. All existing and proposed utility, pipeline, open space, or FM CE other easements are to be shown on the parcel map. If there are building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the parcel map. The applicant shall show all access restrictions on the parcel map. 30. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall have FM CE the map reviewed by all applicable public and private utility companies cable, telephone, gas, electric, Atascadero \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 Conditions Of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure TPM 2006-0084 / PLN 2006-1119 PS: Planning Services BL: Business License BS: Building Services Address: 7155 Valle Avenue GP: Grading Permit BP: Building Permit FD: Fire Department PD: Police Department FI: Final Inspection CE: City Engineer TO: Temporary WW: Wastewater Occupancy CA: City Attorney F0: Final Occupancy Mutual Water Company). The applicant shall obtain a letter from each utility company indicating their review of the map. The letter shall identify any new easements that may be required by the utility company. A copy of the letter shall be submitted to the City. New easements shall be shown on the parcel map. 31. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall GP, BP CE submit plans and supporting calculations/reports including street improvements, underground utilities, composite utilities, and grading/drainage plans prepared by a registered civil engineer for review and approval by the City Engineer. 32. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall GP, BP CE submit calculations to support the design of any structures or pipes. Closed conduits shall be designed to convey the 10 -year flow with gravity flow, the 25 -year flow with head, and provide safe conveyance for the 100 -year overflow. 33. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall GP, BP CE provide for the detention and metering out of developed storm runoff so that it is equal to or less than undeveloped storm runoff. 34. Drainage basins shall be designed to desilt, detain and GP, BP CE meter storm flows as well as release them to natural runoff locations. 35. A mechanism for funding and maintenance of the storm GP, BP CE drain facilities shall be provided. 36. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall GP, BP CE show the method of dispersal at all pipe outlets. Include specifications for size & type. 37. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall GP, BP CE show method of conduct to approved off-site drainage facilities. 38. Concentrated drainage from off-site areas shall be GP, BP CE conveyed across the project site in drainage easements. Acquire drainage easements where needed. Drainage shall cross lot lines only where a drainage easement has been provided. If drainage easement cannot be obtained the storm water release must follow the exact historic path, rate and velocity as prior to the subdivision. 39. All public improvements shall be constructed in GP, BP CE conformance with the City of Atascadero Engineering \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 Conditions Of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure TPM 2006-0084 / PLN 2006-1119 PS: Planning Services BL: Business License BS: Building Services Address: 7155 Valle Avenue GP: Grading Permit BP: Building Permit FD: Fire Department PD: Police Department FI: Final Inspection CE: City Engineer TO: Temporary WW: Wastewater Occupancy CA: City Attorney F0: Final Occupancy Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or as directed by the City Engineer 40. Off-site streets shall be improved consistent with the GP, BP CE tentative parcel map. 41. Alignment of frontage improvements shall be approved by GP, BP CE the City Engineer. 42. All utilities shall be undergrounded on project frontage GP, BP CE 43. Applicant shall pay sewer extension (Annexation), BP CE Connection and Reimbursement fees (if applicable) upon issuance of building permit. Mitigation Measures 44. The project shall be conditioned to comply with all GP BS, PS, CE 3.b.1 applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust (PM -10) as contained in sections 6.3, 6.4 and 6.5 of the April 2003 Air Quality Handbook. Section 6.3: Construction Equipment ■ Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to manufacturer's specifications. ■ Fuel all off-road and portable diesel powered equipment, including but not limited to bulldozers, graders, cranes, loaders, scrapers, backhoes, generator sets, compressors, auxiliary power units, with ARB certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (Non - taxed version suitable for use off-road). ■ Maximize to the extent feasible, the use of diesel construction equipment meeting the ARB's 1996 or newer certification standard for off-road heavy-duty diesel engines. ■ Install diesel oxidation catalysts (DOC), catalyzed diesels particulate filters (CDPF) or other District approved emission reduction retrofit services (Required for projects grading more than 4.0 acres of continuously worked area). Section 6.4: Activity Management Techniques ■ Develop a comprehensive construction activity management plan designed to minimize the amount of large construction equipment operating during any given time period. ■ Schedule of construction truck trips during non -peak hours to reduce peak hour emissions. ■ Limit the length of the construction workday period, if necessary. ■ Phase construction activities, if appropriate. Section 6.5: Fugitive PM10 All of the following measures shall be included on grading, demolition and building plan notes: \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 Conditions Of Approval TPM 2006-0084 / PLN 2006-1119 Address: 7155 Valle Avenue Timing BL: Business License GP: Grading Permit BP: Building Permit FI: Final Inspection TO: Temporary Occupancy F0: Final Occupancy Responsibility /Monitoring PS: Planning Services BS: Building Services FD: Fire Department PD: Police Department CE: City Engineer WW: Wastewater CA: City Attorney Mitigation Measure A. Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible. B. Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non -potable) water should be used whenever possible. C. All dirt stockpile areas should be sprayed daily as needed. D. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project re -vegetation and landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. E. Exposed ground areas that are plann4ed to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with a fast -germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation is established. F. All disturbed soil areas not subject to re -vegetation should be stabilized using approved chemical soil binder, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the APCD. G. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc, to be paved should be complete as soon as possible. In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. H. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site. I. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114. J. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or was off trucks and equipment leaving the site. K. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where feasible. L. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the dust control program and to order increased watering, as necessary, to prevent transport of dust off site. The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the APCD prior to land use clearance for map recordation and land use clearance for finish grading of any structure. 45. The project shall be conditioned to comply with all BP, GP BS, PS, CE 3.16.2 applicable Air Pollution Control District mitigation measures for Naturally Occurring Asbestos. Under the ARB Air Toxics Control Measure (ATCM) for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations, prior to any grading activities at the site, the project proponent shall ensure that a geologic evaluation is conducted to determine if NOA is present within the \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 Conditions Of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure TPM 2006-0084 / PLN 2006-1119 PS: Planning Services BL: Business License BS: Building Services Address: 7155 Valle Avenue GP: Grading Permit BP: Building Permit FD: Fire Department PD: Police Department FI: Final Inspection CE: City Engineer TO: Temporary WW: Wastewater Occupancy CA: City Attorney F0: Final Occupancy area that will be disturbed. If NOA is not present, an exemption request must be filed with the District. If NOA is found at the site the applicant must comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM. This may include development of an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan and an Asbestos Health and Safety Program for approval by the APCD. 46. The building permit site plan shall identify all protection BP PS 4.e.1 and enhancement measures recommended by the Certified Arborist in the Tree Protection Plan. Tree protection fencing shall be installed at the locations called out in the Tree Protection Plan. 47. The developer shall contract with a certified arborist BP PS 4.e.2 during all phases of project implementation. The certified arborists shall be responsible for monitoring the project during all phases of construction through project completion, as follows: (a) A written agreement between the arborist and the developer outlining an arborist monitoring schedule for each construction phase through final inspection shall be submitted to and approved by planning staff prior to the issuance of building/grading permits. (b) Arborist shall schedule a pre -construction meeting with engineering /planning staff, grading equipment operators, project superintendent to review the project conditions and requirements prior to any grubbing or earth work for any portion of the project site. All tree protection fencing and trunk protection shall be installed for inspection during the meeting. Tree protection fencing shall be installed at the line of encroachment into the tree's root zone area. (c) As specified by the arborist report and City staff: ■ Prune all trees in active development areas to be saved for structural strength and crown cleaning by a licensed and certified arborist; ■ Remove all debris and spoils from the lot cleaning and tree pruning. ■ In locations where paving is to occur within the tree canopy, grub only and do not grade nor compact. Install porous pavers over a three-inch bed of % inch granite covered with one -inch pea gravel for screeding. If curbs are required, use pegged curbs to secure the porous pavers. Pegged curbs are reinforced six to eight curbs poured at grade with a one - foot by one -foot pothole every four to six linear feet. ■ All trenching or grading within the protected root zone area, outside of the tree protection fence shall require hand trenching or preserve and protect roots that are larger than 2 inches in diameter. \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 Conditions Of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure TPM 2006-0084 / PLN 2006-1119 PS: Planning Services BL: Business License BS: Building Services Address: 7155 Valle Avenue GP: Grading Permit BP: Building Permit FD: Fire Department PD: Police Department FI: Final Inspection CE: City Engineer TO: Temporary WW: Wastewater Occupancy CA: City Attorney F0: Final Occupancy ■ No grading or trenching is allowed within the fenced protected area. ■ Any roots that are 4 inches in diameter or larger are not to be cut until inspected and approved by the on-site arborist. (d) Upon project completion and prior to final occupancy a final status report shall be prepared by the project arborist certifying that the tree protection plan was implemented, the trees designated for protection were protected during construction, and the construction -related tree protection measures are no longer required for tree protection. 48. Erosion control hydroseed/slope stabilization shall BP PS 4.e.3 consist of native species matching the existing plant species within the tributary stream. The seed and plant material shall not contain any introduced plant species. 49. Should any human remains be discovered on the BP, GP PS 5.d.1 property, all work on the project should stop and the County Coroner contacted. If the human remains are identified as being Native American, the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) should be contacted at (916) 653-4082. 50. The grading permit application plans shall include erosion BP, GP CE/PS 6.10.1 control measures to prevent soil, dirt, and debris from entering the storm drain system during and after construction. A separate plan shall be submitted for this purpose and shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer at the time of Building Permit application. 51. All cut and fill slopes shall be hydroseeded with an BP CE/PS 6.b.2 appropriate erosion control method (erosion control blanket, hydro -mulch, or straw mulch appropriately anchored) immediately after completion of earthwork between the months of October 15 through April 15. All disturbed slopes shall have appropriate erosion control methods in place. Duration of the project: The contractor will be responsible for the clean-up of any mud or debris that is tracked onto public streets by construction vehicles. 52. A soils report shall be required to be submitted with a BP CEPS 6.c.1 future building permit by the building department. 53. The developer is responsible for ensuring that all GP/BP CE 8.e.f.1 contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such measures are implemented. Failure to comply with the approved construction Best Management Practices will result in the issuance of correction notices, \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 Conditions Of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure TPM 2006-0084 / PLN 2006-1119 PS: Planning Services BL: Business License BS: Building Services Address: 7155 Valle Avenue GP: Grading Permit BP: Building Permit FD: Fire Department PD: Police Department FI: Final Inspection CE: City Engineer TO: Temporary WW: Wastewater Occupancy CA: City Attorney F0: Final Occupancy citations, or stop orders. 54. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan GP/BP CE 8.e.f.2 (SWPPP)/Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the building permit. The plan shall include storm water measures for the operation and maintenance of the project for the review and approval of the City Engineer. The Building Permit application plans shall identify Best Management Practices (BMPs) appropriate to the uses conducted on site that effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants into storm water runoff. 55. All construction activities shall comply with the City of GP/BP PS/BS 11.d.1 Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours of operation. \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ITEM NUMBER: 4 DATE: 6-5-07 EXHIBIT C: Tentative Parcel Map 2006-0084 (AT 06-0047) 2 0 a s 2 w aaq�i N� < W xya� Q•'OL� SRR J\• .. l �' !i'. N m 4 � ♦ =@$e 3�F ! a•�42 �rllC!0 E / � •0' 345 �� P �; � \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 06 PLNs\PLN 2006-1119 7155 Valle Ave\PLN 2006-1119 staff report.doc ti C ITEM NUMBER: 5 DATE: 6-5-07 Planning Commission Staff Report Staff Report - Community Development Department PLN -2099-0480 Tentative Parcel Map 2006-0083 (AT 06-0084) 5485 Olmeda Avenue (Madruga) SUBJECT: The project consists of a proposed condominium map over an existing lot of record to create two (2) airspace units on one common lot. The lot is developed with one single- family residence and one additional unit is proposed for construction. RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends: Planning Commission adopt Resolution PC 2007-0051 approving Tentative Parcel Map 2006-0083, a request to establish two (2) airspace units on one common lot, based on findings and subject to conditions of approval. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant/Owners: Rodney and Deborah Madruga, 5495 Olmeda Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422 2. Project Address: 5485 Olmeda Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422 APN: 029-292-016 3. General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential 4. Zoning District: Residential Multi -Family - 10 (Maximum 10 du/ac) 5. Site Area: 0.222 acre 6. Existing Use: One existing residence 7. Environmental Status: Categorical Exemption: Class 3, construction & conversion of small structures \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER: 5 DATE: 6-5-07 And Class 15, Minor Land Divisions DISCUSSION: Background The property is located on Olmeda Avenue near Rosario Avenue within the RMF -10 Zoning District. The parcel is relatively flat and is currently developed with one existing residence. City sewer will serve the property and water is available from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company. Condominium Design The proposed map will create two (2) airspace units on one legal lot of record. One new unit is proposed behind the existing unit. A second driveway is proposed at 12 feet in width with pavers (Condition 13), and landscaping on both sides of the driveway. Proposed Site Plan \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER: 5 DATE: 6-5-07 The new two-story, three bedroom residence is proposed with 1,100 square feet of living space, plus a 420 square foot attached garage. The existing residence contains two bedrooms. Both the existing and proposed residences have attached two car garages. One additional designated guest parking space is located towards the rear of the lot and additional parking is available in the driveways in front of both residences, for a total of at least six spaces, as required by the Zoning Ordinance. Front Elevation: New Unit A minimum of 300 square feet of private open space for each unit is provided in the front, side, and rear yards of each unit. A landscape plan and fencing plan have been provided by the applicant. Drought tolerant plant species shall be installed, and the existing front lawn shall be replaced with drought tolerant plantings (Condition 14.) The subdivision is consistent with the General Plan Medium Density Residential Land Use Designation and Residential Multi -family Zoning regulations. Native Trees Four native Live Oaks are located on or near the site. No native trees are proposed for removal. Arborist Report and tree protection plans have been provided which identify native tree impacts ranging from 10% to 30%. Arborist monitoring shall be required for construction around tree #1 (23" Live Oak) and tree protection fencing shall be installed prior to construction (Condition 12.) \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER: 5 DATE: 6-5-07 Public Improvements The project has been conditioned to construct curb, gutter, and sidewalk along the Olmeda Avenue frontage (Condition 42). All utilities to the new unit and along the project frontage shall be undergrounded (Condition 44). Environmental Review: As proposed, the project qualifies for a Class 3(b) and a Class 15 Categorical Exemption, which exempts the conversion and/or construction of multi -family projects of less than four units, which do not otherwise create a negative impact. CONCLUSION: The proposed condominium map, as conditioned, is consistent with the 2002 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance and the airspace configurations are consistent with the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance. Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the Tentative Parcel Map as conditioned. ALTERNATIVES: 1. The Commission may approve the map subject to additional or revised project conditions. The Commission's motion to approve must include any new or revised project conditions. 2. The Commission may deny the map if it is found to be inconsistent with the General Plan or any of the other required findings. The Commission's motion to deny must include a finding basis for denial. 3. The Commission may continue the hearing and refer the item back to staff for additional information or analysis. Direction should be given to staff and the applicant on required information. PREPARED BY: Callie Taylor, Assistant Planner ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 -- Location Map (General Plan & Zoning) Attachment 2 — Architecture plans for proposed unit Attachment 3 — Site improvement Plans Attachment 4 — Arborist Report Attachment 5 -- Draft Resolution PC 2007-0051 \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER: 5 DATE: 6-5-07 ATTACHMENT 1: Location Map (General Plan / Zoning) TPM 2006-0083 5485 01meda Avenue de RMF -10 RMF -10 RMF -10 - -------- - - --- - - - - - - - - ... ... .. 5485 01meda Ave.. . . ......... 4 Zone: Residential Multi -Family - 10 du/ac (RMF -10) Land Use Designation: Medium Density Residential (MDR) \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER: 5 DATE: 6-5-07 ATTACHMENT 2: First Floor Plan: New Unit Architectural Plans: TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Avenue \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER: 5 DATE: 6-5-07 ATTACHMENT 2: Second Floor Plan: New Unit Architectural Plans: TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Avenue 0v 4r 2!r�- /0 uPTOF - �'- a F �I r7 �r. 2030 •N. 2030 &,H, i ER AT f 6 fdim3 BAT L INE. — 13 .Avr AF] AF1SD jllot/ B MASTER DROOM� BEDRM 2 f OJ l 14) j .. A,W1 AF i L { API q u � PFI equaed to have a wWth not lea" Then the width of the door h-23 .e+vsd wtnV4it reaE1 erwtl a length not less than 36 UPPER F=L O R PLAN /} tl'PYeL C So lGA'� Sec. t0lr1p3.3 .t7j ,swO as terr9M111,11 o4a) in fixed or arwr.hi.-- ck of BEDROOM 3 1 . AF s,,;tdl Elcalr and 1"iati! Fl. Furnaces located in an attic or in an i.Mer space shall be accessible by an Opening passageway of sufficient $ite to permit ren of the largest piece of the fumace or the w heeter (30'x30 minimurn continuous fFOm \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER: 5 DATE: 6-5-07 ATTACHMENT 2: Front & Rear Elevations: New Unit Architectural Plans: TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Avenue \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER: 5 DATE: 6-5-07 ATTACHMENT 2: Front & Rear Elevations: New Unit Architectural Plans: TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Avenue 6. ma yyy 4 7. X 8. De W 10. '@ 11. 12. RIGHT ELEVATION m-- LEFT ELEVATION \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER: 5 DATE: 6-5-07 ATTACHMENT 3: Site Improvement Plans TPM 2006-0083 5485 01meda Avenue \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\ -TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083548501meda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc Is �1 ILI E) 000 a till i ate. z tllyl! r }} t1l, -- 4-4 \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\ -TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083548501meda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER: 5 DATE: 6-5-07 =t'•' : , � eel ' � ! � ! I _ { $li \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc e � F cv �J 0 R d IC R � I ` i B =t'•' : , � eel ' � ! � ! I _ { $li \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER: 5 DATE: 6-5-07 _• ____ _� f ! `'' \ i' .I i"',, '` $ is z I(s a 1 y �171 ►- ,�--• i irk :� I� I � II < �� ' ,_4C3 Ni t 1 i i t ilii! }'a {I i if:�a�;a. o � �� @�dsgE,,jls� gtt �#!li � ��1.•�i� � �� • { tF14�;��i11�� 9gl�ei`�I�'� llf�1:: ��! + tepp a p! � t !tiliS {{{{a{HHU ia{{{{{u's,{ I� .. Nicol 011110 \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc fPi r r r 1 °ell \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc LEGEND I 0 15gal, I sgal. 5gal. 15gal- I 5gal. 5gal. 5gal, 5gal. 5gal, Install landscape with automatic irrigation for each redideme. Plant trees and shrubs with soil amendment. Cover planted areas with 4 inches Humus. LANDSCAPE PLAN PKFPARED BY: I QM DAWSON CSL# 790359 "00PORIT31 , . ArASCADD4, (805) 462-25W ITEM NUMBER: 5 DATE: 6-5-07 Landscape Plan \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc 14ndscape Legend �7Lagersimmia indica Crept myrde tree cerci5 occidentalis Wcslem redbud Buddicia davidii Honcray bush ptatallis at-ifoija Landon plane tree Pislacia chmensis Chinese pistacia 14melocal is sp. Day fil) Cislus sp. Sunset rockrose Ribes, Ovata ey Sugar bush 0 R.smannus offliciahs Rosemary 15gal, I sgal. 5gal. 15gal- I 5gal. 5gal. 5gal, 5gal. 5gal, Install landscape with automatic irrigation for each redideme. Plant trees and shrubs with soil amendment. Cover planted areas with 4 inches Humus. LANDSCAPE PLAN PKFPARED BY: I QM DAWSON CSL# 790359 "00PORIT31 , . ArASCADD4, (805) 462-25W ITEM NUMBER: 5 DATE: 6-5-07 Landscape Plan \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 ATTACHMENT 4: Arborist Report & Tree Protection Plan TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Avenue A & T ARBORISTS P.O. BOX 1311 TEMPLETON, CA 93465 (805) 434-0131 8-31-06 Rod Madruga APR 2 7 2007 5485 Olmeda I This tree protection plan is in regard to the planned lot split and second ho]COWONITi OE1;Ei OPM1tENT above named -address. There are three coast live oaks (Quercus agrifolia) located on the property and an additional coast live oak on the property to the east. Access to the planned second home will use an existing driveway next the garage of the front home. The driveway appears to be elevated on approximately 8-10 inches of fill. Pavers will be required within the drip line of tree #I. The storm drain appears too close to the tree and will treed to be moved. A potential new path is outline on the plans. The electrical, water and gas trenches are also very close to tree #1. They may not be able to be moved due to required distances for the existing home and the sewer line. All utility trenches shall be hand dug and airspaded. The arborists shall be on hand for all digging within the drip line oftree #1. No roots larger than 1" shall be cut without arborist approval. The final occupancy letter shall include pictures of these exposed trenches that show the conduit(s) being routed under roots. The owner shall notify the arborists for the trenching activity. If monitoring is not performed, tree #1 will have to be bonded per city requirements. The post holes for the fence near trees #2 and #3 shall be hand dug. All roots >1" in diameter shall be cut with sharp tools. It is the responsibility of the owner to provide a copy of this tree protection plan to any and all contractors and subs that work within the drip line of any native tree. It is highly recommended that each contractor sign and acknowledge this tree protection plan. This project shall require an on-site pre -construction meeting with the city, owner, grading contractor and the arborist. Topics will include fencing, monitoring and requirements for a positive final occupancy letter. All trees potentially impacted by this project are numbered and identified on both the grading plan and the spreadsheet. Trees are numbered on the grading plans and in the field with an aluminum tag. Tree protection fencing is shown on the grading plan. In the lield, trees to be saved have yellow tape and trees to be removed have red tape. Tree Rating System A rating system of 1-10 was used for visually establishing the overall condition of each tree on the spreadsheet. The rating system is defined as follows: Rating Condition Deceased \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 1 Evidence of massive past failures, extreme disease and is in severe decline. 2 May be saved with attention to class 4 pruning, insect/pest eradication and future monitoring. 3 Some past failures, some pests or structural defects that may be mitigated by class IV pruning. 4 May have had minor past failures, excessive deadwood orminor structural defects that can be mitigated with pruning. 5 Relatively healthy tree with little visual structural and or pest defects. 6 Healthy tree that probably can be left in its natural state. 7-9 Have had proper arboricultural pruning and attention or have no apparent structural defects. 10 Specimen tree with perfect shape, structure and foliage in a protected setting (i.e. park, arboretum). The following mitigation measures/methods must be fully understood and followed by anyone working within the drip line of any native tree. Any necessary clarification will be provided by us (the arborists) upon request. 1. Fencing: The proposed fencing shall be shown in orange ink on the grading plan. It must be a minimum of 4' high chain link, snow or safety fence staked at the edge of the drip line or line of encroachment for each tree or group of trees. The fence shall be Lip before any construction or earth moving begins. The owner shall be responsible for maintaining an erect fence throughout the construction period. The arborist(s), upon notification, will inspect the fence placement once it is erected. After this time, fencing shall not be moved without arborist inspection/approval. If the orange plastic fencing is used, a minimum of four zip ties shall be used on each stake to secure the fence. All efforts shall be made to maximize the distance from each saved tree. The fencing must be constructed prior to the city pre -construction meeting for inspection by the city and the arborists. 2. Soil Aeration Methods: Soils within the drip line that have been compacted by heavy equipment and/or construction activities must be returned to their original state before all work is completed. Methods include water jetting, adding organic matter, and boring small holes with an auger (18" deep, 2-3' apart with a 24" auger) and the application of moderate amounts of nitrogen fertilizer. The arborist(s) shall advise. 3. Chip Mulch: All areas within the drip line of the trees that cannot be fenced shall receive a 4-6" layer of chip mulch to retain moisture, soil structure and reduce the effects of soil compaction. 4. Trencbing Within Drip Line: All trenching for foundations within the drip I ine of native trees shall be hand dug. All major roots shall be avoided whenever possible. All exposed roots larger than 1" in diameter shall be clean cut with sharp pruning tools and not left ragged. A Mandatory meeting between the arborists and grading/trenching contractor(s) shall take place prior to work start. This activity shall be monitored by the arborist(s) to insure proper root pruning is talking place. \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 5. Grading Within The Drip Line: Grading should not encroach within the drip line unless authorized. Grading should not disrupt the normal drainage pattern around the trees. Fills should not create a ponding condition and excavations should not leave the tree on a rapidly draining mound. 6. Exposed Roots: Any exposed roots shall be re-covered the same day they were exposed. If they cannot, they must be covered with burlap or another suitable material and wetted down 2x per day until re -buried. 7. Paving Within The Drip Line: Pervious surfacing is preferred within the drip line of any native tree. This includes coring vertical tubing approximately 4 feet on center within the drip line and backfilling with Mychorizza, slow release fertilizer and pea gravel. 8. Equipment Operation: Vehicles and all heavy equipment shall not be driven under the trees, as this will contribute to soil compaction. Also there is to be no parking of equipment or personal vehicles in these areas. All areas behind fencing are oil limits unless pre -approved by the arborist. 9. Existing Surfaces: The existing ground surface within the drip line of all native trees shall not be cut, filled, compacted or pared, unless shown on the grading plans and approved by the arborist. 10. Construction Materials And Waste: No liquid or solid construction waste shall be dumped on the ground within the drip line of any native tree. The drip line areas are not for storage of materials either. 11. Arborist Monitoring: An arborist shall be present for selected activities (trees identified on spreadsheet and items bulleted below). The monitoring does not necessarily have to be continuous but observational at times during these activities. It is the responsibility of the owner(s) or their designee to inform us prior to these events so we can make arrangements to be present. It is the responsibility of the owner to contract (prior to construction) a locally licensed and insured arborist that will document all monitoring activities. • pre -construction fence placement • any utility or drainage trenching within any drip line • All grading and trenching near trees requiring monitoring on the spreadsheet 12. Pre -Construction Meeting: An on-site pre -construction meeting with the Arborist(s), Owner(s), Planning Staff, and the earth moving team shall be required for this project. Prior to final occupancy, a letter from the arborist(s) shall be required verifying the health/condition of all impacted trees and providing any recommendation, for any additional mitigation. The letter shall verify that the arborist(s) were on site for all grading and/or trenching activity that encroached into the drip line of the selected native trees, and that all work done in these areas was completed to the standards set forth above. \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 13. Pruning: Class 4 pruning includes -Crown reduction pruning shall consist of reduction of tops, sides or individual limbs. A trained arborist shall perform all pruning. No pruning shall take more than 25% of the live crown of any native tree. Any trees that may need pruning for road/home clearance shall be pruned prior to any grading activities to avoid any branch tearing. 14. Landscape: All landscape under the drip -line shall be drought tolerant or native varieties. Lawns shall be avoided. All irrigation trenching shall be routed around drip lines; otherwise above ground drip -irrigation shall be used. It is the owner's responsibility to notify the landscape contractor regarding this mitigation. 15. Utility Placement: All utilities and sewer/storm drains shall be placed down the roads/driveways and when possible outside of the drip lines. The arborist shall supervise trenching within the drip line. All trenches in these areas shall be exposed by air spade or hand dug with utilities routed under/over the roots. Roots greater than 2 inches in diameter shall not be cut. 16. Fertilization and Cultural Practices: As the project moves toward completion, the arborist(s) may suggest either fertilization and/or mycorrhiza applications that will benefit tree health. Mycorrhiza offers several benefits to the host plant, including faster growth, improved nutrition, greater drought resistance, and protection from pathogens. The included spreadsheet includes trees listed by number, species and multiple stems if applicable, diameter and breast height (4.5'), condition (scale from poor to excellent). status (avoided, impacted, removed, exempt), percent of drip line impacted, mitigation required (fencing, root pruning, monitoring), construction impact (trenching, grading), recommended pruning and individual tree notes. If all the above mitigation measures are followed, we feel there will be no additional long-term significant impacts to the remaining native trees. A & T Arborists strongly suggests that the responsible party (owner of their designee) make copies of this report. Any reproduction by A & T Arborists or changes to the original report will require an additional charge. Please let us know if we can be of any future assistance to you for this project. Steven G. Alvarez Certified Arborist #WC 0511 ChipTamagni cry Certified Arborist #WE 6436-A \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE 6507T. \c�ityh m%GlPmn @e mPL m SemmmqDos%TPU -Tenta WeParcelUam\TPUBBTPUyoemg &b omQa Ave\T Py2mmomlPC j� �2 2 \ m s 0- _ . � . kb o Z Z �k tz a= }§ ] F- k R° / ¢ 0 m O O O �k t 2 fƒ 2 2 2 K7o / _ °�§ / § Co $§) \ � ƒ � � § �& ® ° )»2 k§� I � � e U) e o \\$\( \ f§°2° \� � Q - 0 -,� we W § k " 0 m § $ / % 2 c ƒ =7 u u % § k q o� om 0 � wP ƒ a r m # « wj 2� )|& ~ - 2 } k � � � � Co * §Q§\} ¥ � §$66� i k o o O O � (■$(I � ƒ 2 � a � 2 e ± � :m 't- q Cl)V r1- 00 a) � � r- 00 CD o _ -�, \c�ityh m%GlPmn @e mPL m SemmmqDos%TPU -Tenta WeParcelUam\TPUBBTPUyoemg &b omQa Ave\T Py2mmomlPC e SEJum Tree Protection Plan ITEM NUMBER: 5 DATE: 6-5-07 1 IF ":1.74 • yi7 f to 79 fS: • • r. 101.6. `aW + W 414 17�.f, CntYtE 110%3.19 / / snln Iw iwla 9a 71 M r �t l1 4 +14 �1 1 .. IR ` +�i.r _ 20 R-93100' / '. �' y (•• -also' "t g. 9962 yo=,..� _=iZ°.•,"r: i 1 ,.. �' _ _ �� 9 .�. .N +1.5 i r , •. l �J�'"J�� 97.39 - ?`en�..•�J It rV ! SOA MC / OLMEDA A' t-. 0Lh1EuA AVENUE [,Y1 \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER: 5 DATE: 6-5-07 ATTACHMENT 5: Draft Resolution PC 2007-0051 TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Avenue DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. PC 2007-0051 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2006-0083, (PLN 2099-0480) ESTABLISHING TWO AIRSPACE UNITS ON ONE COMMON LOT AT 5485 OLMEDA AVENUE (Madruga) WHEREAS, an application was received from Rodney & Deborah Madruga, 5495 Olmeda Avenue, Atascadero, CA (Owner/Applicant), to consider a Tentative Parcel Map for conversion of one existing dwelling to an airspace condominium and to establish an additional airspace unit for a new second residence on one common lot; (total of two (2) airspace units on one common lot); and, WHEREAS, a Categorical Exemption (Class 3(b) and Class 15) was prepared for the project in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is Medium Density residential (MDR); and, WHEREAS, the site's zoning district is RMF -10 (Residential Multi -family — 10 du/ac); and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Tentative Parcel Map application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at which both oral and documentary evidence was admitted on behalf of said projects; and, NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission takes the following actions: SECTION 1. Findings for approval of condominium Mau. The Planning Commission finds as follows: 1. The proposed map, as conditioned, is consistent with the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements. 2. The design and improvement of the proposed map, as conditioned, is consistent with the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements. \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 3. The site is physically suitable for the density of development proposed. 4. The design and improvement of the proposed map will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. 5. The map is consistent with the character of the immediate neighborhood. 6. The design of the condominium map will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through, or the use of property within, the proposed subdivision; or substantially equivalent alternative easements are provided. 7. The proposed condominium map design and type of improvements proposed will not cause serious public health problems. SECTION 2. Approval. The Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on June 5, 2007 resolved to approve Tentative Parcel Map 2006-0083 (AT 06-0084) subject to the following: EXHIBIT A: CEQA Exemption EXHIBIT B: Conditions of Approval EXHIBIT C: Tentative Parcel Map 2006-0083 (AT 06-0084) \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER: 5 DATE: 6-5-07 On motion by Commissioner and seconded by Commissioner , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: ( ) NOES: ( ) ABSENT: ( ) ADOPTED: ABSTAINED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA Joan O'Keefe Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Warren M. Frace Planning Commission Secretary \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc EXHIBIT A: Proposed Categorical Exemption TPM 2006-0083 Finding of Exemption TO: ® File FROM: City of Atascadero 6907 El Camino Real Atascadero, CA 93422 ITEM NUMBER: 5 DATE: 6-5-07 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in Compliance with Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code Project Title: Tentative Parcel Map 2006-0083 (AT 06-0084): Rodney & Deborah Madruga Project Location (Include County): 5485 Olmeda Avenue, Atascadero, California 93422 (San Luis Obispo County) Project Description: The project will create 2 airspace condominium units allowing individual sale and ownership of two detached units within a multi -family project. One unit is existing and one additional unit is proposed to be built. Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Atascadero Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: Rodney & Deborah Madruga Exempt Status: ❑ Ministerial (Sec. 21080 (b)(1); 15268) ❑ Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)) ❑ Emergency Project (Sec.21080 (b)(4); 15269(b)(c)) ® Categorical Exemption (Sec. 15303, Construction or Conversion of Small Structures & Sec. 15315, Minor Land Divisions) Reasons whyproject is exempt: Class 3(b) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Section 15303) exempts the conversion and/or construction of small structures including multi -family projects of less than 4 units and which do not otherwise create a negative impact. Class 15 of CEQA (Section 15315) exempts the division of residentially zoned property in urbanized areas zoned into four or fewer parcels. Date: May 31, 2007 Callie Taylor Assistant Planner \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 EXHIBIT B: Conditions of Approval / Mitigation Monitoring TPM 2006-0083 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation TPM 2006-0083 /Monitoring Measure FM: FINAL MAP PS: Planning Services Address:548501meda Avenue BL: Business License GP: Grading Permit BS: Building Services FD: Fire Department BP: Building Permit PD: Police Department FI: Final Inspection CE: City Engineer TO: Temporary WW: Wastewater Occupancy CA: City Attorney F0: Final Occupancy Standard Planning Conditions 1. The approval of this application shall become final, subject to FM PS the completion of the conditions of approval, fourteen (14) days following the Planning Commission approval unless prior to that time, an appeal to the decision is filed as set forth in Section 9-1.111(b) of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall be valid for two FM PS years after its effective date. At the end of the period, the approval shall expire and become null and void unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request received prior to the expiration date, or a final map is recorded. 3. The Community Development Department shall have the FM PS authority to approve minor changes to the project that (1) result in a superior site design or appearance, and/or (2) address a construction design issue that is not substantive to the Tentative Parcel Map. 4. A parcel map drawn in substantial conformance with the FM PS approved tentative map, and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein, shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 5. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Ongoing CA City of Atascadero or its agents, officers, and employees against any claim or action brought to challenge an approval by the city, or any of its entities, concerning the subdivision. 6. The parcel map shall be subject to additional fees for park or FM PS recreation purposes (QUIMBY Act) as required by City Ordinance. Project Planning Conditions 7. Prior to final map, the applicant shall submit CC&Rs for review FM PS/PW and approval by the Community Development Department. The CC&R's shall record with the Final Map and shall include the following: a. Exclusive use easements for private yard areas. \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 Conditions Of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation TPM 2006-0083 /Monitoring Measure FM: FINAL MAP PS: Planning Services Address:548501meda Avenue BL: Business License GP: Grading Permit BS: Building Services FD: Fire Department BP: Building Permit PD: Police Department Fl: Final Inspection CE: City Engineer TO: Temporary WW: Wastewater Occupancy CA: City Attorney F0: Final Occupancy b. Provisions for maintenance of all common areas including access, parking, street trees, fencing and landscaping. c. Maintenance and upkeep of all common areas. d. A detailed list of each individual homeowner's responsibilities for maintenance of the individual units. e. Individual unit's responsibility for keeping all trash receptacles within the unit's garage. f. A provision for review and approval by the City Community Development Department for any changes to the CC&R's that relate to the above requirements prior to the changes being recorded or taking effect. 8. This map shall be for the approval of airspace units only. Prior FM PS/PW to recordation of the final map, the applicant shall submit a condominium plan for recording concurrently with the final map. A qualified licensed professional shall prepare the final map and the condominium plan. 9. The color scheme of the new unit shall be consistent with Lot BP PS 2 of tract 2562 (located behind the subject residence) 10. Arborist monitoring shall be required for construction within the FI PS drip line of tree #1 (23" Live Oak.) Tree protection fencing shall be installed prior to permit issuance. A letter from the project arborist shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to final to certify that all work has been done as to the requirements of the tree protection plan. 11. Pavers or decorative concrete (stamped & colored) shall be BP PS used for the new driveway. 12. All landscape shall be drought tolerant. The existing lawn BP PS along Olmeda shall be replaced with drought tolerant plantings. City Engineer Project Conditions 13. Applicant shall provide a pedestrian access easement along FM CE the frontage on Olmeda Avenue consistent with the tentative map. \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 Conditions Of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation TPM 2006-0083 /Monitoring Measure FM: FINAL MAP PS: Planning Services Address:548501meda Avenue BL: Business License GP: Grading Permit BS: Building Services FD: Fire Department BP: Building Permit PD: Police Department Fl: Final Inspection CE: City Engineer TO: Temporary WW: Wastewater Occupancy CA: City Attorney F0: Final Occupancy 14. Applicant shall improve Olmeda Avenue to City standard 405 GP, BP CE across the frontage of the project. Improvement width to be 1/2 the street plus 10'. City Engineer Standard Conditions 15. In the event that the applicant bonds for the public GP, BP CE improvements required as a condition of this map, the applicant shall enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City Council. 16. An engineer's estimate of probable cost shall be submitted for GP, BP CE review and approval by the City Engineer to determine the amount of the bond. 17. The Subdivision Improvement Agreement shall record FM CE concurrently with the Final Map. 18. A six (6) foot Public Utility Easement (PUE) shall be provided GP, BP CE contiguous to the property frontage. 19. The applicant shall acquire title interest in any off-site land that GP, BP CE may be required to allow for the construction of the improvements. The applicant shall bear all costs associated with the necessary acquisitions. The applicant shall also gain concurrence from all adjacent property owners whose ingress and egress is affected by these improvements. 20. Slope easements shall be obtained by the applicant as GP, BP CE needed to accommodate cut or fill slopes. 21. Drainage easements shall be obtained by the applicant as GP, BP CE needed to accommodate both public and private drainage facilities. 22. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for FM CE review in conjunction with the processing of the parcel map. 23. The final map shall be signed by the City Engineer prior to the FM CE map being placed on the agenda for City Council acceptance. 24. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall pay all FM CE outstanding plan check/inspection fees. 25. Prior to recording the map, the applicant shall bond for or FM CE complete all improvements required by these conditions of approval. 26. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall submit a FM CE copy of a valid tax bond. \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 Conditions Of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation TPM 2006-0083 /Monitoring Measure FM: FINAL MAP PS: Planning Services Address:548501meda Avenue BL: Business License GP: Grading Permit BS: Building Services FD: Fire Department BP: Building Permit PD: Police Department Fl: Final Inspection CE: City Engineer TO: Temporary WW: Wastewater Occupancy CA: City Attorney F0: Final Occupancy 27. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall bond for FM CE or set monuments at all new property corners. A registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate by certificate on the parcel map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. 28. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall submit a FM CE map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein. The map shall be submitted for review and approval by the City in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 29. All existing and proposed utility, pipeline, open space, or other FM CE easements are to be shown on the parcel map. If there are building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the parcel map. The applicant shall show all access restrictions on the parcel map. 30. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall have the FM CE map reviewed by all applicable public and private utility companies (cable, telephone, gas, electric, Atascadero Mutual Water Company). The applicant shall obtain a letter from each utility company indicating their review of the map. The letter shall identify any new easements that may be required by the utility company. A copy of the letter shall be submitted to the City. New easements shall be shown on the parcel map. 31. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall GP, BP CE submit plans and supporting calculations/reports including street improvements, underground utilities, composite utilities, and grading/drainage plans prepared by a registered civil engineer for review and approval by the City Engineer. 32. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall GP, BP CE submit calculations to support the design of any structures or pipes. Closed conduits shall be designed to convey the 10 - year flow with gravity flow, the 25 -year flow with head, and provide safe conveyance for the 100 -year overflow. 33. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall GP, BP CE provide for the detention and metering out of developed storm runoff so that it is equal to or less than undeveloped storm runoff. 34. Drainage basins shall be designed to desilt, detain and meter GP, BP CE storm flows as well as release them to natural runoff locations. 35. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall GP, BP CE show the method of dispersal at all pipe outlets. Include \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 Conditions Of Approval Timing Responsibility Mitigation TPM 2006-0083 /Monitoring Measure FM: FINAL MAP PS: Planning Services Address:548501meda Avenue BL: Business License GP: Grading Permit BS: Building Services FD: Fire Department BP: Building Permit PD: Police Department Fl: Final Inspection CE: City Engineer TO: Temporary WW: Wastewater Occupancy CA: City Attorney F0: Final Occupancy specifications for size & type. 36. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall GP, BP CE show method of conduct to approved off-site drainage facilities. 37. Concentrated drainage from off-site areas shall be conveyed GP, BP CE across the project site in drainage easements. Acquire drainage easements where needed. Drainage shall cross lot lines only where a drainage easement has been provided. If drainage easement cannot be obtained the storm water release must follow the exact historic path, rate and velocity as prior to the subdivision. 38. All public improvements shall be constructed in conformance GP, BP CE with the City of Atascadero Engineering Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or as directed by the City Engineer 39. Off-site streets shall be improved consistent with the tentative GP, BP CE parcel map. 40. Project shall include construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk GP, BP CE along entire frontage. 41. Alignment of frontage improvements shall be approved by the GP, BP CE City Engineer. 42. All utilities shall be undergrounded on project frontage GP, BP CE 43. Applicant shall pay sewer extension (Annexation), Connection BP CE and Reimbursement fees (if applicable) upon issuance of building permit. \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 EXHIBIT C: Tentative Parcel Map AT 06-0084 TPM 2006-0083 \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc 9 9i: i 1' s H!�F6�ist¢t gg Mt3 4= f � li O � II 11dill+FI: 1111111 - J � Y i \ � • '. 1h H 6 � T' \ I pi I .� I I 1 i I x i . I I I I �a \\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- pre 06 PLNs (Old Planning Docs)\- TPM - Tentative Parcel Maps\TPM 06\TPM 2006-0083 5485 Olmeda Ave\TPM 2006-0083.PC SR.ct.doc ITEM NUMBER: 6 DATE: 6-5-07 Atascadero Planning Commission Staff Report - Community Development Department PLN 2006-1178 Amendment to the Building Envelope on Lot 14 of Tentative Tract Map 2000-0001 (Tract 2396), 10460 Portal Road (Puma) SUBJECT: The project consists of a proposal to amend the location of the approved building envelope and add a second building envelope on lot 14 of Tract 2396 (Rancho De Paraiso.) One main residence and one second unit are proposed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Planning Commission adopt Resolution PC 2007-0049, certifying proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-0006, approving an amendment to the location of the building envelope and the addition of a second building envelope on lot 14 of Tract 2396, based on findings and subject to conditions. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Owners: Deborah Puma 1408 Crown Way, Paso Robles, CA 93446 Applicant: Western Dairy Designers Associates, Inc. 316 West "F" Street, Suite 100, Oakdale, CA 95361 2. Project Address: 10460 Portal Road, Atascadero, CA 93422 APN 054-192-033 3. General Plan Designation: Rural Estate 4. Zoning District: Residential Suburban 5. Site Area: 3.96 net acres 6. Existing Use: Vacant site 7. Environmental Status: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-0006 DISCUSSION: Background: Tentative Tract Map 2000-0001 was approved for the Rancho de Paraiso subdivision in 2001. Building envelopes were identified and recorded on an additional map sheet as a condition of the project development. Building envelopes were identified to protect native trees and steep slopes throughout the development. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THIS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHEET IS PROVIDED TO DELINEATE THE LOCAT10N OF FUTURE BUILDING SITES THAT ARE IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP. g — LOT 5 �\ + `4 LOT 1�� t LOT 9 \ a LOT 10 a LC1T 1$ LOT 17 1 LOT 11 LOT 12 LOT 13 Approved building envelope Lot 14, 10460 Portal Road �OT 14 TRACT 2396 AS REQUESTED 8, RANCHO DE PARAISO BEING A SUBONMON OF LOTS M. t1, 17 a 19 OF ATAL SS -042 AND LOTS 22-27 INCI.USI E OT ATAL 00-019 AND A DEDOATION OF PORTIONS OF LOTS 29, 29, 30 k S7 OF ATAL 00-049 IN T1rE CITY OF ATASCADERO, OOUNTY OF SAN Of OSISP6, STATE OF CALIF6RNIA APN: DATE: APRIL 2001 FILENAME: MD125 Rhe Po Iw TMd 2396 F'mw Map FIELD SOOK; 1114 tit pulM ■1: SCwe pgq[C1f d7b MINTER vgT1; TIM I' -Z1' -2964M0125 M0125 5 OF S CUESTA TITLE 16670D �/I►iil■a�_T� C\ � r SHEET 4 In 2001, when Tract 2396 was established, second units were not permitted in Atascadero. The tract was therefore designed with building envelopes to accommodate only one house on each lot. A condition regarding the building envelopes was adopted with TTM 2000-0001 to allow a mechanism for changing the location of the approved building envelope. If future construction is inconsistent with the "building site details" a Precise Plan would be completed and CEQA review would address any new environmental impacts of the proposed construction. However, the possibility of adding a second envelope on a lot was not addressed at the time the map was adopted since they were not allowed anywhere in the City. In addition to the building envelopes, a condition was included to limit the amount of cut and fill for the construction of new residences within the Rancho de Paraiso subdivision. (See diagram below.) Conditions of Approval of Original Tentative Tract Map 2000-0001: Mitigation Monitoring Program Timing Responsibility Mitigation /Monitoring Measure San Gabriel Raod / Escondido Road / Portal Road G.P Gr�adNPPw t PS: fty QSwAm TTM 2000-0009 / RA 2001.0003 l Zone Change 2001-0013 OP. UdN P«Rt BS FO. FV OocupwcWanry F: Ful Occupancy Va- 0 patrw0f PI: Pubic !r p oveme els Fish and Gams CE city 5*— RW=: R&p" war ouaAty cannot Board Ck Cay Atmxy MfvVC: AMX.-4eM Planning Services 1. Future building envelopes shall be in substantial FM PS 1.c. conformance with the 'Building Site Details" submitted with the Tentative Tract Map application and attached to the initial study. The building sites shall be delineated by a survey point and corresponding radius on the final map. 2. The maximum grading permitted on any site shall not BP PS 1.c. exceed 8 feet in overall height (cut or fill) measured from natural to finish grade. Where 8 feet of cut would be exceeded for the building pad, a second floor or split level shall be used. Yard areas shall be minimized to reduce the amount of cut or fill required. Retaining walls shall be incorporated where there is a proposed grade difference of 8 feet to achieve a natural transition. 3. If future construction on a lot is inconsistent with the BP PS 1.c. "Building Site Details" a Precise Plan application will be required to be approved for the residence. Grading: The General Plan encourages the preservation of the contours of the hills and states that buildings built on hillsides shall conform to the topography using the slope of the land as the basis of the structure. This primary goal of the City's General Plan is difficult for staff to implement without having agrading ordinance in effect. Staff has conditioned the project such that the placement of the new homes be consistent with the Building Site Details submitted for the project. The building sites on the details are limited to areas under 20 percent slope. Additionally, the project conditions require the building envelopes to be delineated by a survey point and corresponding radius on the final map. If future construction on a lot is inconsistent with the `Building Site Details" or requires more than 8 -feet of cut or fill (see discussion below) a Precise Plan application will be required to be approved for the residence. �traa�r una -ro I C+wv wave of, I *a.cr�a-ness'� 4 � � M a-Pftr ~ c. irr c,rrb -ro rVW Me 'fib I .4-rwr W -P - W - Wiwi. (14.x) rhr-mrrTwm Iz%*/- WAWr614 4-� Vt-Agriwal %44-k*, vebwwccl, e d -s Ow4 Sn Ya Jeira&% kN4 - Mu4pWCO-1 In 2003, Atascadero adopted a second unit ordinance to allow second living units on properties which meet certain criteria. The second unit ordinance allows for a 1000 square foot unit, plus an attached garage, in addition to the main residence on the property. The property must be on one acre or larger in order to connect the second unit to a septic system. Site Description The subject property is Lot 14 of Tract 2396 in Rancho de Paraiso. The site is located on the corner of Portal Road and Escondido Road. A blueline creek runs through the center of the property and along Escondido Road. The site contains several native oak trees including mostly Blue Oaks and Valley Oaks. The site is approximately 3.96 acres net (4.73 acres gross) and has an average slope of 19%. Several easements run through the property, including Escondido Road and Portal Road, as well as PG&E, PUE, Navy, and drainage easements. View from Atascadero Road tuward� Poral O'oad %\ ith Property entrance in the background VIC%v Il-oun [lie -;'1111C inici:;c':tiwi. Farin,-, A %V View of the proposed 2° unit site from Escondido Rd Site Photos Analysis: An Amendment is being proposed on Lot 14 of Tract 2396 to approve an alternative location for the primary building envelope, and to establish a second building envelope on the opposite side of the blueline creek. The primary residence is proposed to take access off Portal Road, and the second unit will take access off of Escondido Road. The amendment is being proposed to amend the building envelopes on Lot 14 only. The changes would be shown as an addendum to the Additional Map Sheet which was originally recorded with the final map for Tract 2396. Due to the fact that the subdivision was designed to accommodate only one house on each lot, the Fire Department has concerns about allowing second units on all lots within the Rancho de Paraiso subdivision. Portal Road is extremely steep and narrow, making it difficult for fire trucks to access residences in an emergency. To allow second units on all lot within the subdivision could potentially double the number of residences on this difficult road. The subject property on Lot 14 does not pose a problem for emergency access because the second unit will take access off of Escondido Road. However, any other properties within the tract will have to apply for an amendment on an individual basis in order to establish a second building envelope on any additional lots. Escondido Road Po oad Second Unit Primary Unit `�' Blueline Creek The main residence on the subject site is proposed at 3,716 square feet with a 1,156 square foot attached garage on a 12% average slope. The second unit is proposed at 998 square feet with an 821 square foot attached garage/ storage space on a 17% slope. 1,200 cubic yards of cut and 815 cubic yards of fill will be required for the construction of the two residences. Due to the size of the garage attached to the second unit (821 square feet, which is more than 50% of the size of the second unit) the garage will be considered an accessory structure to the main unit. A maximum of two accessory structures are allowed per the zoning ordinance. Building envelopes are proposed by the applicant which encompass all of the grading which will be done with construction of the two residences. The envelopes have been designed to avoid the majority of the tree canopies and the blueline creeks on site. A separate building envelope is proposed for the septic system. The septic is designed as a seepage pit (deep pit) disposal system due to the limited flat area and soil suitability on site. A pedestrian bridge is proposed between the two residences, to be located over the blueline creek in the center of the property. Bridges are an allowed use within blueline creek setbacks as stated in the creek setback ordinance currently under review. Conditions have been included in the draft resolution which require the applicant to receive approval from Fish and Game, Army Corps of Engineers, and the Water Quality Board prior to permit issuance. These conditions are consistence which those originally adopted with TTM 20000-0001. Native Trees: No native tree removals are proposed. 7 Blue Oaks and Valley Oaks will be impacted by the construction of the residences and the septic system. Impacts range from 10% to 45%. Arborist monitoring will be required for several trees during construction. An arborist report is included as Attachment 4 of this report. The submitted tree protection plan was designed in the beginning stages of the project development. Since that time, the septic has been redesigned as a deep pit system to limit the area required for the leach fields. The draft resolution has been conditioned to require a revised arborist report to identify any changes in tree protection and construction impacts prior to building permit issuance. Tree Removals: When comparing the originally approved building site with the applicant's project proposal, staff noticed that two trees shown on the original site survey were not shown on the current plans. During a site investigation, it was discovered that two native trees, an 18 -inch White Oak and a 19 -inch Live Oak were removed on the vacant site without a tree removal permit. The applicant has been able to provide documentation that the trees were removed prior to the time that they purchased the property (see Attachment 3.) A letter from the project arborist states that based on the chippings found on site, the trees were probably removed prior to last year when the applicant purchased the site. Building Site Detail showing approved building site and site survey done with TTM 2000-0001: Tree mitigation fees and penalty have not been issued for the illegal tree removals since the applicant has been able to show that the removal took place prior to their purchase of the lot. Staff has provided a tree mitigation fee schedule for Planning Commission review should the Commission choose to charge any mitigation or penalty fees. When trees are removed without a permit, the tree mitigation fees are usually doubled as a penalty for not obtaining a permit or going through the review process. Standard mitigation for these tree removals would be $458.33, and a double fee for removal without a permit would be $916.66 should the Commission chose to charge the applicant for the removals. Evergreen Native Trees (inches) dbh notes 1 19 -inches Live Oak Total 19 -inches Mitigation Requirement Tree Fund Payment: $ 158.33 Environmental Review: Deciduous Native Trees (inches) dbh notes 1 18 -inches White Oak Total 18 -inches Tree Fund Payment: $ 300.00 Totals 37 -inches $ 458.33 A proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. The proposed document is attached for Planning Commission review. CONCLUSION: The proposed building envelope amendment and second building envelope addition, as conditioned, are consistent with the 2002 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the amendment to the building envelope on Lot 14 of Tract 2396 and establish a second envelope as conditioned. ALTERNATIVES: 1. The Commission may approve the map amendment with modified project conditions. 2. The Commission may continue the hearing and refer the item back to staff for additional information or analysis. Direction should be given to staff and the applicant on required information. 3. The Commission may deny the map if it is found to be inconsistent with the General Plan or any of the other required findings. The Commission's motion to deny must include a finding basis for denial. PREPARED BY: Callie Taylor, Assistant Planner ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 -- Location Map (General Plan & Zoning) Attachment 2 — Original building site — approved with TTM 2000-0001 Attachment 3 — Tree Removal information: provided by applicant Attachment 4 — Arborist report Attachment 5 — Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-0006 Attachment 6 — Draft Resolution PC 2007-0049 ATTACHMENT 1: Location Map (General Plan / Zoning) 10460 Portal, Atascadero, CA 93422 � Illi Project Site: 10460 Portal Rd. ot 14 Zoning: RS (Residential Suburban) General Plan Designation: RE (Rural Estate) ATTACHMENT 2: Building envelope location approved with TTM 2000-0001 J w 0 w 0 z 0 m I 0 O 00 d WE a V ATTACHMENT 3: Information regarding unpermitted tree removals Provided by applicant ?va&%g Z)44 D dqw �4Qaociates. 9�cc. 316 West F Street, Ste 100 Oakdale, CA 95361 (209) 646.6674 www.dalrydesigners.com City of Atascadero 6907 EI Camino Real Atascadcro, California 93422 805-461-5000 Attention: Callie Taylor Reference RTTM Application Lot 14, APN 054-192-033 Rancho Dc Paraiso Tract 2396 Dear Callie Taylor; PL, ry - OLOU6 'I 11 b Doing this application process, it has been brought to our attention several native oak trees that were noted with the original TTM application #TTM 2000-0001 are now not on Lot 14. There apparently has been no application for the removal of these trees on record and the question has risen if Deborah Puma is responsible for the tree removal. This property was owned by James and Ronda Thorpe as documented with a copy of a preliminary title report prepared by Cuesta Title dated Tuesday, March 07, 2006. This report marks the beginning of the purchase escruu for the property purchase by Deborah Puma. The escrow closed in late April, 2006. I have been able to put a time line to the period at which the trees were visible on an aerial and later gone from an aerial picture. Note the copies of photos from Zillow.com: • Photo page 1: Trees are present. • Photo page 2: No construction on Portal Road. • Photo page 3: A foundation layout for a new home at the south west comer of San Gabriel Road and Escondido Road. Note the copies of photos from Goggle Earth: • Photo page 4: Trees are gone. • Photo page 5: The new home at the south west comer of San Gabriel Road and Escondido Road is nearing completion. These photos attest to a time line between which the trees are there and a time at which they are not there. It is obvious they were removed between these time periods. Simply by checking the permit application and inspection dates during the construction process of the house at the south west comer of San Gabriel Road and Escondido Road one can pin point the time line. Considering it is a known fact the trees were not at the site at the time just prior to the opening of escrow by Deborah to purchase the property, these dates will exonerate Deborah from the responsibility for the removal of the trees. Considering this data, I presume these missing trees will not have any involvement with our RTTM application and or Deborah Puma in any manor. I presume the City of Atascadero may or may not choose to pursue the questioning of Jamcs Thorpc to determine if he owned the property during the time period identified and address the issue with him. Thank you, David Avila Enclosures: ATTACHMENT 3: Information regarding unpermitted tree removals Provided by applicant ZMow - Real Estate Search Results Recently Sold r All other homes Me: A! y Beds: Ary Baths: Any Size: n Leh' Any Tyoe: Any Sold within:_ Any. Reset all setections 11 me Fob Page 3 of 4 �W p 2007 NAVTE d 2007 Glab X lorer and Suppliers I U 2007 Prom Sort by. Statu,5 Price Zestimkate*■ 0# Up Size* Lot. Built Typet Sold Days* Offered on by Your result Save as $808,038 4 2.5 -- 43,124 2004 SF 10005 Favorite in hscondida 1Y Zillo I Rd See comas Mao thls house -- No homes can be displayed at this zoom level http:lhvww. zillow.comisearchlSearch.ht:n"raddrstrthood=I 0005%20escondido%20rd&city... 2/13/2007 ATTACHMENT 3: Information regarding unpermitted tree removals Provided by applicant Lillow - Rcai Estate Search ResWts Page 3 of 4 Recently Sold I— All other homes fth e: Any Dds:.Any Mbs; AU Size Any Lot: Anw Type: Anv Sold within: Anv RCeet altl seleetionc r IN'Y � %� 2iliow.com 2007 NAVTE c) ZOD7 GobeX IQmr and Suppliers Cc) 2007 Proxix Sort bv: 5 atus Price Zestimate** fid Baa Size* Lot Built Typet Sold Days# Offered Ott by .Vk Your result Save as $808,036 4 2.5 -- 43,124 2044 SF -- -- e 10005 Favorite in L5condlo My Zillow J fad See comps I Map this house -- No homes can be displayed at this zoom level http:l/www. zi Uow. comiscarch/Search.hlm?addrstrthood=10005 %,20escondido%20rd&city... 2/13/2007 ATTACHMENT 3: Information regarding unpermitted tree removals 10005 escomdido toad, a'scadoro.ceF] Y- A,^40T Na�ae" imre9� � a4pT Digifel� 6e Pu,n1-, 15'2@'23.77' N 120'31'1677'w m.. 13nm St....... Eve a(l ic Ia1`j(—}130330m ATTACHMENT 3: Information regarding unpermitted tree removals Provided by applicant )IF ATTACHMENT 3: Information regarding unpermitted tree removals Provided by applicant Eib Edit Record hayigate Fgfm Repoqs Format Tab Help Jump �J Main 1 Routing Status Contractors I Parcels I CustornFields;J Fees I Fee Summarf fictions Routing History Conditions Permit Type -7 Permit# BLD -2002.2154 Address 110005 ESCONDIDO ApUS uite I City JATASCADERO statep—D zip 193422 J Permit Information Master Permit Routing Queue rp;"--It Applied [1012812002 Project J status ]final Approved [04109/2003 Description CONSTRUCT A 2,550 FT2 FOUR BEDROOM 5FR W/ATTACHED 792 FT2 GARAGE Issued 194/14/2903 145 FT2 PORCH Final 0710° 7[004. Submitted IDoug Butz - 466.5699 Clock Stepped Days F 612 Expires FT26 �11003 . Owner ION First Name JBU-1z F5860 TRAFFIC WAY Last N ame PTS T R U-C—T A ATASCADERO CA 93422-2553 Phone 1(805) 4665699 fv- OwneilsApplicant? Applicant Last NamFBUTZ CONSTRUCTION _J First N... 5860 TRAFFIC WAY Phone 1(805) 4E6-5699 Cust # 100924 IATAS CAD E R 0 CA 93422 Lender Last Name First Name Phone StartLive view AXI... Inbox-Microt... f. InForumBold z '711161/ ATTACHMENT 4: Arborist Report P.O. BOX 1311 TEMPLETON, CA 9346 4605) 434.0131 January 24. 2007 Deborah Puma 1408 Crown Way Paso Roblcs, CA 93446 MAR 2 6 2007 COMMUNITY OfUi' 0PMENT RE: Addendum for tree protection plan at Track 2396, lot 414. APN 054-192-033, Escondido Road- Atascadero Cali fornki. Deborah; 1n the later part of November 2006 we met at the proposed development stated above, one of the items we examined and discussed was the two inissing oak trees near the center of the lot. During our exarmnation we found wood chips near the location of the missing trees that appeared (Torn a erwnp routing machine. The chips haci the previous year's annual weeds grow;ng L�,ithin them which mould indicate that the trees were removed prior to your purchzj.�� (j=. t.ine lj)t. Please let us know if we may be of amr fn: thrr assistance to you on this project. Steven G. Alvarez Certified Arborist AWE -0511. ATTACHMENT 4: Arborist report 0 0 v� cn LLLt- WUJ LU LU n ul r oQ ¢Z OL 06 J LUd d � � Q [x ci F m LL! cl `G P 3: LLfp LL.z ch (b Gl cb CY U) i Lu N cera r N � n(0 N Lia LO w LLS 0 t11V CV [V N c7 P- p5 fi Q LU N N N N C") r N N z 0 Wl UJ UJ LU LU UJ Uj LLI LY u .z z z z z z Z Z ui W W W LU S co cn LLJ 0 p 21 5 >- .>- >- LLLa >- LLL! '>- z >- LLS > W Ix Z a a- La_ o- am ca,. o. aQ=ww�� mar Lt) o �`' LL b 0: LL L.L. Ll. &- Li., LL LL f!a GJ U E- U H c U i-- L7 LU O F.. C.7 U LU O 00 i7UC'7C7UzC7C?z m {V O CNN O. N 0 LO N. i7 a h fA� Z 0 h � — _ — Q L.1 t1) W _O � r3 IWN £V M G7 mcolglcl x Q i"7 LL'? (O to co t:0 cq W [] �� r? N 0 � N ttil h LU N LU v® J O C] Q Q O 00 W LL a m M 7 7 `1 ' co w w t SV MCO t` :, 4m QrMm,gTto(Di%-COC r CD M r r T T rt r %- r r r P ATTACHMENT 4: Arborist report - �r I �� (Tree Protection Plan conditioned to be updated with building permit review to reflect redesigned septic system) lag o Y f ox (Tree Protection Plan conditioned to be updated with building permit review to reflect redesigned septic system) ATTACHMENT 5: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-0006 See Following ITEM NUMBER: 6 DATE: 6-5-07 ATTACHMENT 6: Draft Resolution PC 2007-0049 PLN 2006-1178 DRAFT RESOLUTION PC 2007-0049 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2000-0001, ESTABLISHING A NEW BUILDING ENVELOPE LOCATION AND A SECOND BUILDING ENVELOPE ON LOT 14 (10460 Portal Road / Puma) WHEREAS, an application was received from Owner, Deborah Puma 1408 Crown Way, Paso Robles, CA 93446, and Applicant, Western Dairy Designers Associates, Inc. 316 West "17" Street, Suite 100, Oakdale, CA 95361, to consider an Amendment to the building envelope for Lot 14 of Tentative Tract Map 2000-0001 to establish a new building envelope location and a second building envelope at APN 054-192-033; and, WHEREAS, a proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the project in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the site's current General Plan Designation is Rural Estate (RE); and, WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is Residential Suburban (RS); and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject amendment application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero on June 5, 2007, at which both oral and documentary evidence was admitted on behalf of said project; and, NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero takes the following actions: SECTION 1. Findings for certification of proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 1. The Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA; and, 2. The Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was presented to the Planning Commission, and the information contained therein was considered by the Planning Commission, prior to recommending action on the project for which it was prepared; and, ITEM NUMBER: 6 DATE: 6-5-07 3. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment when mitigation measures are incorporated into the project. 4. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. 5. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. 6. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. SECTION 2. Findings for approval of amendment to the building envelope and the addition of a second building envelope on Tentative Tract Map 2000-0001 The Planning Commission finds as follows: 1. The proposed amendment, as conditioned, is consistent with the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements; and, 2. The site is physically suitable for the development proposed; and, 3. The design and improvement of the proposed building site will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat; and, 4. The amendment is consistent with the character of the immediate neighborhood; and, 5. The proposed amendment and type of improvements proposed will not cause serious public health problems. SECTION 3. Approval The Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on June 5, 2007 resolved to approve an amendment to the building envelope on lot 14 of Tract 2396 subject to the following: EXHIBIT A: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-0006 EXHIBIT B: Conditions of Approval EXHIBIT C: Revised building envelope attachment page for Tract 2396 EXHIBIT D: Proposed building envelopes EXHIBIT E: Site Plan EXHIBIT F: Grading Plan EXHIBIT G: Site Sections EXHIBIT H: Site Elevations EXHIBIT I: Bridge detail ITEM NUMBER: 6 DATE: 6-5-07 On motion by Commissioner and seconded by Commissioner , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: ( ) NOES: ( ) ABSENT: ( ) O•' D ABSTAINED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA Joan O'Keefe Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Warren M. Frace Planning Commission Secretary ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 EXHIBIT A: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-0006 PLN 2006-1137 RECEIVED {' tAg 1 S 2007 slowilia�� CITY OF ATASCADERO : ,e^^soh—, JUL,E L. RODEWALD rera C COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF ATASCADERO NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 1S HEREBY GIVEN that the Atascadero Planning Commission will be holding a public hearing to consider the following project and environmental determination. The public is encouraged to attend. Applicant: Western Dairy Designers Associates, Inc. 316 West "F" Street, Suite 100, Oakdale, CA 95361 Owner. Deborah Puma 1408 Crown Way, Paso Robles, CA 93446 Project Title: PLN 2006-1178 / Amendment to building envelope on Lot 14 of TTM 2000-0001 Project 10460 Portal Road, Atascadero, CA 93422 Location: APN 054-192-033 Project The proposed project consists of an amendment to the existing building envelope which was approved Description: with TTM 2000-0001 (Rancho de Paraiso subdivision map.) The project proposes modifications to the primary building envelope, and proposes the addition of a second building envelope on the other side of the lot for a secondary unit. The average slope on site is approximately 19%. The main residence is proposed at 3,716 square feet with a 1.156 square foot attached garage on a 12% slope. The second unit is proposed at 998 square feet with an 821 square foot attached garage/ storage space on a 17% slope. 1,200 cubic yards of cut and 815 cubic yards of fill is required. A blucline creek runs through the property between the two building envelopes. A pedestrian bridge is proposed across the blucline creek. No native trcc removals arc proposed. 7 Blue Oaks and Valley Oaks will be impacted by the construction of the residences and the septic system. Both residences will connect to a septic system which is designed as a seepage pit (deep pit) disposal system. General Plan Designation: Rural Estate (RE) Zoning District: Residential Suburban (RS) Environmental Begins: May 17, 2007 Review Dates: Ends: June 5, 2007 Hearing Date: June 5, 2007 Hearing City Hall. Council Chambers Location: 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 Proposed Based on the initial study prepared for the project, a Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental is proposed. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for public Determination: review from 5!17/07 through 615/07 at 6907 EI Camino Real, Community Development Department, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Any interest on may re � proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and project files. Questions should be dire Callie T Stant Planner at 461-5000, ext 3448. %/17/0-7 warren Frace, Community Development Director Date F.N R INN 6907 EL CAMINO REAL • ATASCADERO, CA 93422 • (805) 461-5000 1 FAX 461-7612 ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 EXHIBIT B: Conditions of Approval / Mitigation Monitoring PLN 2006-1178 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility/ Mitigation PLN 2006-1178 Monitoring Measure FM: Fnal Map PS: Planning Services 10460 Portal Road BL: Business License GP: Grading Permit BS: Building Services FD: Fire Department BP: Building Permit PD: Police Department FI: Final Inspection CE: City Engineer TO: Temporary WW: Wastewater Occupancy CA: City Attorney F0: Final Occupancy Planning Conditions 1. The approval of this application shall become final, subject to FM PS the completion of the conditions of approval, fourteen (14) days following the Planning Commission approval unless prior to that time, an appeal to the decision is filed as set forth in Section 9-1.111(b) of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The Community Development Department shall have the FM PS authority to approve minor changes to the project that (1) result in a superior site design or appearance, and/or (2) address a construction design issue that is not substantive to the Tentative Tract Map. 3. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Ongoing CA City of Atascadero or its agents, officers, and employees against any claim or action brought to challenge an approval by the city, or any of its entities, concerning the amendment. 4. The building envelope on lot 14 of Tract 2396 shall be GP/BP PS amended as shown in Exhibit D. The identified building envelope shall compass all grading and structures on site. The septic shall be located within the septic system envelope. 5. All conditions of Tentative Tract Map 2000-0001 shall be GP/BP PS adhered to with the exception of the revised building envelope location on Lot 14. 6. The revised building envelope shall encompass all building GP/BP PS footprints and building pad grading as shown in Exhibits C and D. A copy of the approved building envelope shall be kept on file with Community Development Department with the previously approved Tract 1382 building site attachments. 7. The second envelope and approved second unit shall apply to Lot 14 of Tract 2396 only. Any future second envelopes requested within the tract shall apply for an amendment and be processed individually based on site suitability. 8. The applicant shall submit permits or letters of no impact from the Department of Fish and Game, Water Quality Board, and the Army Core of Engineers prior to permit issuance. 9. A revised arborist report shall be submitted prior to building permit issuance. The revised arborist report shall identify ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility/ Mitigation PLN 2006-1178 Monitoring Measure FM: Final Map PS: Planning Services 10460 Portal Road BL: Business License BS: Building Services GP: Grading Permit FD: Fire Department BP: Building Permit PD: Police Department Fl: Final Inspection CE: City Engineer TO: Temporary WW: Wastewater Occupancy CA: City Attorney F0: Final Occupancy changes made to the septic system location. The arborist shall monitor construction around tree as identified in the arborist report. A letter shall be submitted to the Community Development department prior to final of the residences to ensure hat all work was completed as to requirements of the tree protection plan. City Engineer Project Conditions 7. All Public Works Department conditions of approval for Tract GP, BP CE 2396 continue to apply to this project. City Engineer Standard Conditions 8. The applicant shall acquire title interest in any off-site land that GP, BP CE may be required to allow for the construction of the improvements. The applicant shall bear all costs associated with the necessary acquisitions. The applicant shall also gain concurrence from all adjacent property owners whose ingress and egress is affected by these improvements. 9. Slope easements shall be obtained by the applicant as GP, BP CE needed to accommodate cut or fill slopes. 10. Drainage easements shall be obtained by the applicant as GP, BP CE needed to accommodate both public and private drainage facilities. 11. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall GP, BP CE submit calculations to support the design of any structures or pipes. Closed conduits shall be designed to convey the 10 - year flow with gravity flow, the 25 -year flow with head, and provide safe conveyance for the 100 -year overflow. 12. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall GP, BP CE provide for the detention and metering out of developed storm runoff so that it is equal to or less than undeveloped storm runoff. 13. Drainage basins shall be designed to desilt, detain and meter GP, BP CE storm flows as well as release them to natural runoff locations. 14. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall GP, BP CE show the method of dispersal at all pipe outlets. Include specifications for size & type. 15. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall GP, BP CE show method of conduct to approved off-site drainage facilities. ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility/ Mitigation PLN 2006-1178 Monitoring Measure FM: Final Map PS: Planning Services 10460 Portal Road BL: Business License BS: Building Services GP: Grading Permit FD: Fire Department BP: Building Permit PD: Police Department Fl: Final Inspection CE: City Engineer TO: Temporary WW: Wastewater Occupancy CA: City Attorney F0: Final Occupancy 16. Concentrated drainage from off-site areas shall be conveyed GP, BP CE across the project site in drainage easements. Acquire drainage easements where needed. Drainage shall cross lot lines only where a drainage easement has been provided. If drainage easement cannot be obtained the storm water release must follow the exact historic path, rate and velocity as prior to the subdivision. 17. Applicant shall submit erosion control plans and a Storm GP, BP CE Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) if area disturbed by the project is equal to or greater than 1.0 acres. The Regional Water Quality Control Board shall approve the SWPPP. 18. All utilities shall be undergrounded on project frontage GP, BP CE Mitigation Measures 19. All nondecorative exterior lighting shall be shielded to direct BP BS, PS, CE 1.d.1 light toward buildings or the ground. 20. The project shall be conditioned to comply with all BP, GP BS, PS, CE 3.b.1 applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust (PM -10) as contained in sections 6.3, 6.4 and 6.5 of the April 2003 Air Quality Handbook. Section 6.3: Construction Equipment ■ Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to manufacturer's specifications. ■ Fuel all off-road and portable diesel powered equipment, including but not limited to bulldozers, graders, cranes, loaders, scrapers, backhoes, generator sets, compressors, auxiliary power units, with ARB certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (Non - taxed version suitable for use off-road). ■ Maximize to the extent feasible, the use of diesel construction equipment meeting the ARB's 1996 or newer certification standard for off-road heavy-duty diesel engines. ■ Install diesel oxidation catalysts (DOC), catalyzed diesels particulate filters (CDPF) or other District approved emission reduction retrofit services (Required for projects grading more than 4.0 acres of continuously worked area). Section 6.4: Activity Management Techniques ■ Develop a comprehensive construction activity management plan designed to minimize the amount of large construction equipment operating during any given time period. ■ Schedule of construction truck trips during non -peak hours to reduce peak hour emissions. ■ Limit the length of the construction workday period, if necessary. ■ Phase construction activities, if appropriate. Section 6.5: Fugitive PM10 All of the following measures shall be included on grading, ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 Conditions of Approval PLN 2006-1178 10460 Portal Road Timing FM: Final Map BL: Business License GP: Grading Permit BP: Building Permit Fl: Final Inspection TO: Temporary Occupancy F0: Final Occupancy Responsibility/ Monitoring PS: Planning Services BS: Building Services FD: Fire Department PD: Police Department CE: City Engineer WW: Wastewater CA: City Attorney Mitigation Measure demolition and building plan notes: A. Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible. B. Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non -potable) water should be used whenever possible. C. All dirt stockpile areas should be sprayed daily as needed. D. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project re -vegetation and landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. E. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with a fast -germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation is established. F. All disturbed soil areas not subject to re -vegetation should be stabilized using approved chemical soil binder, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the APCD. G. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc, to be paved should be complete as soon as possible. In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. H. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site. I. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114. J. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or was off trucks and equipment leaving the site. K. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where feasible. L. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the dust control program and to order increased watering, as necessary, to prevent transport of dust off site. The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the APCD prior to land use clearance for map recordation and land use clearance for finish grading of any structure. 21. Residential Wood Combustion: Under APCD Rule 504, BP, BS, PS, CE 3.b.2 only APCD approved wood burning devices can be installed in new dwelling units. These devices include: All EPA -Certified Phase II wood burning devices; Catalytic wood burning devices which emit less than or equal to 4.1 grams per hour of particulate matter which are not EPA -Certified but have been verified by a nationally- ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility/ Mitigation PLN 2006-1178 Monitoring Measure FM: Final Map PS: Planning Services 10460 Portal Road BL: Business License BS: Building Services GP: Grading Permit FD: Fire Department BP: Building Permit PD: Police Department Fl: Final Inspection CE: City Engineer TO: Temporary WW: Wastewater Occupancy CA: City Attorney F0: Final Occupancy recognized testing lab; Non -catalytic wood burning devices which emit less than or equal to 7.5 grams per hour of particulate matter which are not EPA -Certified but have been verified by a nationally - recognized testing lab; Pellet -fueled woodheaters; and Dedicated gas-fired fireplaces. 22. Creek setbacks shall be consistent with General Plan LOC BP, GP BS, PS, CE 4.b.1 Policy 8.2. A twenty foot setback measured from the ordinary high water mark of the blueline stream shall be maintained. There shall be no grading or structures within the creek setback, with the exception of the pedestrian bridge. 23. Permits or letters of no impact shall be obtained from the BP, GP BS, PS, CE 4.b.2 necessary regulatory agencies prior to building permit issuance. Permits shall be required from the Department of Fish and Game, Army Corps of Engineers, and the Water Quality Board. Any additional mitigation measures required by these regulatory agencies shall be implemented. 24. The pedestrian bridge shall be designed to not disrupt the BP, GP BS, PS, CE 4.b.3 riparian area or water flow within the creek. 25. All work in the stream shall be confined to June 15 to BP, GP BS, PS, CE 4.b.4 October 15. ■ No equipment will be operated in live (wet) stream channels. ■ Any runoff during construction shall be diverted so as not to enter the stream. Sediment catchment basins, erosion control mats, fabric fences, or other appropriate means shall be used when such diversion are necessary. ■ Wash water containing mud or silt from construction operations shall not be allowed to enter the stream. ■ Structures and associated materials not designed to withstand high seasonal flows shall be removed to areas above the high water mark before such flows occur. ■ No debris, soil, silt, bark, sawdust, rubbish, cement or concrete or washing thereof, oil or petroleum products or other organic or earthen material from construction or associated activity or whatever nature shall be allowed to enter into or placed where it may be washed by rainfall or runoff into the stream. When operation are completed, any excess materials or debris shall be removed from the work area. No rubbish shall be deposited within 150 feet of the high water mark of the stream. 26. The building permit site plan shall identify all protection and BP, GP BS, PS, CE 4.e.1 enhancement measures recommended by the Certified Arborist in the Tree Protection Plan. Tree protection fencing shall be installed at the locations called out in the Tree Protection Plan. The Precise Grading Plan shall identify ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility/ Mitigation PLN 2006-1178 Monitoring Measure FM: Final Map PS: Planning Services 10460 Portal Road BL: Business License GP: Grading Permit BS: Building Services FD: Fire Department BP: Building Permit PD: Police Department Fl: Final Inspection CE: City Engineer TO: Temporary WW: Wastewater Occupancy CA: City Attorney F0: Final Occupancy tree protection fencing around the dripline of each existing on-site tree and/or native shrub mass within 20 feet of construction activity. 27. Grading and excavation and grading work shall be BP, GP BS, PS, CE 4.e.2 consistent with the City of Atascadero Tree Ordinance. Special precautions when working around native trees include: ■AII existing trees outside of the limits of work shall remain. ■Earthwork shall not exceed the limits of the project area. -Low branches in danger of being torn from trees shall be pruned prior to any heavy equipment work being done. -Vehicles and stockpiled material shall be stored outside the dripline of all trees. ■AII trees within the area of work shall be fenced for protection with 4 -foot chain link, snow or safety fencing placed per the approved tree protection plan. Tree protection fencing shall be in place prior to any site excavation or grading. Fencing shall remain in place until completion of all construction activities. -Any roots that are encountered during excavation shall be clean cut by hand and sealed with an approved tree seal. 28. The developer shall contract with a certified arborist during BP, GP BS, PS, CE 4.e.3 all phases of project implementation. The certified arborists shall be responsible for monitoring the project during all phases of construction through project completion, as follows: (a) A written agreement between the arborist and the developer outlining a arborist monitoring schedule for each construction phase through final inspection shall be submitted to and approved by planning staff prior to the issuance of building/grading permits. (b) Arborist shall schedule a pre -construction meeting with engineering /planning staff, grading equipment operators, project superintendent to review the project conditions and requirements prior to any grubbing or earth work for any portion of the project site. All tree protection fencing and trunk protection shall be installed for inspection during the meeting. Tree protection fencing shall be installed at the line of encroachment into the tree's root zone area. (c) As specified by the arborist report and City staff: ■ Prune all trees in active development areas to be saved for structural strength and crown cleaning by a licensed and certified arborist. ■ Remove all debris and spoils from the lot cleaning and tree pruning. ■ In locations where paving is to occur within the tree canopy, grub only and do not grade nor compact. Install porous avers over a three-inch bed of 3/4 inch granite covered with ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility/ Mitigation PLN 2006-1178 Monitoring Measure FM: Final Map PS: Planning Services 10460 Portal Road BL: Business License BS: Building Services GP: Grading Permit FD: Fire Department BP: Building Permit PD: Police Department Fl: Final Inspection CE: City Engineer TO: Temporary WW: Wastewater Occupancy CA: City Attorney F0: Final Occupancy one -inch pea gravel for screeding. If curbs are required, use pegged curbs to secure the porous pavers. Pegged curbs are reinforced six to eight curbs poured at grade with a one - foot by one -foot pothole every four to six linear feet. ■ All trenching or grading within the protected root zone area, outside of the tree protection fence shall require hand trenching or preserve and protect roots that are larger than 2 inches in diameter. ■ No grading or trenching is allowed within the fenced protected area. ■ Any roots that are 4 inches in diameter or larger are not to be cut until inspected and approved by the on-site arborist. (d) Upon project completion and prior to final occupancy a final status report shall be prepared by the project arborist certifying that the tree protection plan was implemented, the trees designated for protection were protected during construction, and the construction -related tree protection measures are no longer required for tree protection. 29. Erosion control hydroseed/slope stabilization shall consist BP, GP BS, PS, CE 4.e.4 of native species matching the existing plant species within the tributary stream. The seed and plant material shall not contain any introduced plant species. 30. Should any human remains be discovered on the property, BP PS 5.d.1 all work on the project should stop and the County Coroner contacted. If the human remains are identified as being Native American, the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) should be contacted at (916) 653- 4082. 31. The grading permit application plans shall include erosion GP PS, BS, CE 6.b.1 control measures to prevent soil, dirt, and debris from entering the storm drain system during and after construction. A separate plan shall be submitted for this purpose and shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer at the time of Building Permit application. 32. The developer is responsible for ensuring that all GP PS, BS, CE 8.e.f.1 contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such measures are implemented. Failure to comply with the approved construction Best Management Practices will result in the issuance of correction notices, citations, or stop orders. 33. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)/Erosion GP PS, CE 8.e.f.2 Control Plan shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the building permit. The plan shall include storm water measures for the operation and maintenance of the project for the review and approval of the City Engineer. The Building Permit application plans ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 Conditions of Approval Timing Responsibility/ Mitigation PLN 2006-1178 Monitoring Measure FM: Final Map PS: Planning Services 10460 Portal Road BL: Business License BS: Building Services GP: Grading Permit FD: Fire Department BP: Building Permit PD: Police Department Fl: Final Inspection CE: City Engineer TO: Temporary WW: Wastewater Occupancy CA: City Attorney F0: Final Occupancy shall identify Best Management Practices (BMPs) appropriate to the uses conducted on site that effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants into storm water runoff. 34. All construction activities shall comply with the City of BP, GP PS, BS, CE 11.d.1 Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours of operation. ITEM NUMBER: 6 DATE: 6-5-07 EXHIBIT C: Revised Building Envelope Attachment Sheet for Tract 2396 ITEM NUMBER: 6 DATE: 6-5-07 EXHIBIT D: Proposed Building Envelopes ITEM NUMBER: 6 DATE: 6-5-07 EXHIBIT E: Site Plan ITEM NUMBER: 6 DATE: 6-5-07 EXHIBIT F: Grading Plan EE7 �® N l 5z 3ai 'Sl q$ j a a w w a .. z .n5'9� z a 0 f �I c IN \\ cry' J \ANN QZ \N �\` -. \N,\,\�\ d ♦ ff,y f C3a � ITEM NUMBER: 6 DATE: 6-5-07 EXHIBIT G: Site Sections Q 5+47, 6188 sOS'66g 1+45.8440 r27.44 121.82 k t � # z 1+19.1907 In 122.40 1.18.5497 119.33 m e a _ MO,+fiB.'S3�J 0+68.0384 '119.06 U7 r, W o z U z Lu Lyy \ iii 0+13.3632 y 117.40 106.97 *,+ 0+12.8622 111,00 tr 0+216763 m "' n 116.89 g t — 0+00,4000 112.97 b -w> 0+17.0308 117.00 �� 116.44 g Se sir ra a m m 0 0+00.0004 t1a.69 ITEM NUMBER DATE: 6-5-07 ITEM NUMBER: 6 DATE: 6-5-07 EXHIBIT I: Bridge Detail SL Z 0 q01 a r o Zw x� Ow .. L p L z cc O u;tp Q r' 'n x aU wLL a W Z Q w. o' W Z LL w a W3p �1-Z0O om O auiyu u= Lu Wj ZOZV,j 6U F- fr: po Zi: Lu N U W W O p o 0 a U Z r N o O W r W 3 o F a, a W w x Q a Y x u 0 Q wFCK -u W��U� om LL Z J W O z W U L J to > QO¢o C) O > �¢ 0 Z W 'S ►, Q D= W a UQF W Xp p�0 FW- w�z wm 23aira z at9 -_QJ Q 0 I J U En CL W Ucr m V)OJ w H �„ J Q j 3 N Z w C O Oz W Y R C] Z W F.. jF RJB J Cl)J O YV F - OF- 0WUJ W y a z \ (1{ K J 1 wW .1 \ O=m 0 S' Q Y cco Q 1 W J_ > ITEM NUMBER: 7 DATE: 6-5-07 Atascadero Planning Commission Staff Report - Community Development Department PLN 2007-1190 Conditional Use Permit: Residential Care Facility Use 9525 Gallina Ct — Paradise Valley Care (Vrajich) SUBJECT: The proposed project consists of an application to allow an increase from 6 clients to 8 clients at an existing residential care facility located at 9525 Galina Ct. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission adopt Resolution PC 2007-0048 approving PLN 2007-1190 (Conditional Use Permit) based on findings and subject to Conditions of Approval. Situation and Facts 1. Owner: Ruth and Milan Vrajich, 9525 Gallina Ct., Atascadero, CA 93422 2. Project Address: 9525 Gallina Ct., Atascadero, CA 93422 (San Luis Obispo County) APN 054-272-025 3. General Plan Designation: Rural Estates (RE) 4. Zoning District: Residential Suburban (RS) 5. Site Area: 2.6 acres net 6. Existing Use: Residential Care Facility — 6 clients maximum 7. Environmental Status: Class 1, Categorical Exemption Section 15301: Existing Facilities DISCUSSION: Proiect Definition The proposed project consists of a request to establish a residential care facility serving 8 clients. Paradise Valley Care was established in 1999 and currently, the facility accommodates 6 clients. The Atascadero Municipal Code exempts residential care facilities serving 6 residents or less from review. The applicant is applying to establish a larger care facility with the ability to serve 2 additional clients. Background 9525 Gallina Ct Llano Rd Santa Lucia Rd Surrounding Land Use and Setting: North: Residential Suburban South: Residential Suburban East: Residential Suburban West: Residential Suburban The project site is within the Rural Estates General Plan Land Use Designation and is zoned Residential Suburban, which allows for residential care facilities that serve greater then 6 clients with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. ANALYSIS: Parkina / Traffic / Circulation The increase from 6 clients to 8 clients will not create a significant increase in traffic. The site includes an existing parking area which accommodates residents, visitors, and employees. Adequate access is provided to the site off of Gallina Court. General Plan Consistency The proposed project is consistent with the following General Plan Housing Element Policy: Goal HOS 1: Promote diverse and high quality housing opportunities to meet the needs of all segments of the community In staff's opinion the proposed 8 -client residential care facility is consistent with the surrounding neighborhood and will not create significant impacts to neighborhood traffic. The Fire Department has reviewed the site and has determined that there is adequate emergency access. The proposed project provides increased housing opportunities for seniors. Findings The Planning Commission must make the following five findings to approve the requested use: 1. The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan and the City's Appearance Review Manual. Staff Comment: The use is consistent with the housing elements goals outlined in the General Plan. 2. The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Title (Zoning Ordinance.) Staff Comment: The proposed use is consistent with all zoning ordinance requirements. 3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use. Staff Comment: The proposed use will not be detrimental to the general public or working persons health, safety, or welfare. 4. That the proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the character or the immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development. Staff Comment: The proposed increase in senior clients will not negatively impact the surrounding neighborhood. 5. That the proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be improved in conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the surrounding neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance with the Land Use Element. Staff Comment: The proposed project and use, is consistent with the traffic projections and road improvements anticipated within the General Plan. Based on staff's analysis in the preceding sections, it appears that all of the required findings for approval of a Conditional Use Permit can be made. Environmental Determination The project qualifies for a Class 1 categorical exemption. Conclusion The proposed project is a request to allow 2 additional residents at an existing residential care facility. The proposed increase will not create substantial impacts to the surrounding neighborhood and/or environment. The use is compatible with the Residential Suburban Zoning Designation and will provide an increase in opportunities to elderly persons requiring an additional level of care. ALTERNATIVES 1. The Commission may recommend modifications to the project and/or conditions of approval for the project. 2. The Commission may determine that more information is needed on some aspect of the project and may refer the item back to the applicant and staff to develop the additional information. The Commission should clearly state the type of information that is required and move to continue the item to a future date. 3. The Commission may deny the project. The parcel would retain its designation of Residential Suburban and would be allowed to continue to operate with a maximum of 6 clients. The Commission should specify the reasons for denial of the project and make an associated finding with such action. PREPARED BY: Kelly Gleason, Associate Planner ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: Location Map, General Plan and Zoning Attachment 2: Class 1 Categorical Exemption Attachment 3: Draft Resolution PC 2007-0048 Attachment 1: Location Map, General Plan and Zoning 9525 Gallina Ct Zoning: RS (Residential Suburban) General Plan Designation: RE (Rural Estates) Attachment 2: Class 1 Categorical Exempt •„=� CITY OF ATASCADER O NOTICE OF EXEMPTION 6907 M CamBio real Atascadero. CA 93422 805.4615000 TO: ® Fie Dds Received for MnZ ❑ Office of Plumkq and Research 1400 Teeth Swet Saae wau, CA 95814 FRObd: Citycf Atuc adeno Comrmaiuy Developmerm Dep unnan 6907 E3 Camaro Real) Atuc adero, CA 93422 SUBJECT: Minj f h%&eaf Ddemiulimirt Camp&=eai&Serf= 21152 dtheP>Mic Reaowces Coae Project Title PARADISE VALLEYCARE Project Location [Include County) 4305 Pismo Street Atescndao, CA 93422(52e Inns Mispo CbxxV) Project Description The pro posed project consists of a request to establish a residential care facnky serving 8 clients. Paradise Valley Care was established in 1999 and currently, the facAtyacconaneodates 6 clients. The Atascadero Munkipal code exempts residential care facAties serving 6 residents orkssfrone review. The applicant is applying to establish a larger care faciRy kWh the abiftyto serve 2 additional clients. Name of Public Agmcv Avprmkir Proiect City rg•-tiaacaBra+o Name of Person er Agency Carving Out Proiect Rash mad M ma &gVA 9525 M Ct &ascadw, Ca 93922 Exw3pt Stilus: D Miakurial(Sec.2108D(bX1l 15268) D Declared Ehergmcy(Sec.21080(bi(3k 15269(a)) D E>auVricyProject(Seca1080(bX4k15269(bXc)) ® CaegoriealEkemption(Sec.15301.E)dttingFac alties) Reasons why project is exmpt: C39S4.1.91�ik9.,.�, 4D�X.�6L.(.CCFiQdh ¢®Dva .�aal sal 71wadditimof2residmua2the e:cis tug care facU tywillnotaede a,P bstaztialimpactofe wtormeranlAdm. Date: Aday 25, 2007 Kelly Gleason Associtta Plarma CoaemeAm+oa StuaG.McHsm;, l]payCaa�mo3rIiub�omQl7�cto4 CiyofAexa3mo (805 ji X1.3000 ATTACHMENT 4: Draft Resolution PC 2007-0048 DRAFT RESOLUTION PC 2007-0048 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING PLN 2007-1190 REQUEST TO ESTABLISH AN 8 -CLIENT RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY LOCATED AT 9525 GALLINA COURT APN 054-272-025 (Vrajich) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Ruth and Milan Vrajich (9525 Gallina Ct, Atascadero, CA 93422) Owner and Applicant to consider the establishment of an 8 - client residential care facility at the site of an existing 6 -client facility at 9525 Gallina Ct. (APN 054-272-025); and, WHEREAS, the site's current General Plan Designation is Rural Estates (RE); and, WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is Residential Suburban (RS); and, WHEREAS, Residential Care Facilities serving 8 or more clients is a Conditional Use in the RS Zone; and, WHEREAS, the project is Class 1 Categorically Exempt for Infill Projects in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Conditional Use Permit application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said application; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on June 5, 2007 studied and considered the PLN 2007-1190; and, NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero takes the following actions: SECTION 1. Findings for approval of Conditional Use. The Planning Commission finds as follows: 1. The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan and the City's Appearance Review Manual; and, 2. The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Title (Zoning Ordinance); and, 3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use; and, 4. That the proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the character or the immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development; and, 5. That the proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be improved in conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the surrounding neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance with the Land Use Element. SECTION 2. Approval. The Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on June 5, 2007 resolved to approve the PLN 2007-1190 subject to the following: EXHIBIT A: Conditions of Approval On motion by Commissioner , and seconded by Commissioner the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA Joan O'Keefe Planning Commission Chairperson Attest: Warren M. Frace Planning Commission Secretary EXHIBIT A: Conditions of Approval / Mitigation Monitoring Program PLN 2007-1190 Conditions of Approval / Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS: Planning BL: Business License Services BS: Building 9525 Gallina Ct GP: Grading Permit Services PLN 2007-1190 BP: Building Permit FI: Final Inspection FD: Fire Department PD: Police TO: Temporary Department Occupancy CE: City Engineer F0: Final Occupancy WW: Wastewater FM: Final Map CA: City Attorney Planning Services 1. This conditional use permit shall be for an 8 -resident residential care FM PS facility located at 9525 Gallina Ct (APN 054-272-025) regardless of owner. 2. The approval of this use permit shall become final and effective for the FM PS purposes of issuing building permits fourteen (14) days following the Planning Commission approval unless prior to the time, an appeal to the decision is filed as set forth in Section 9-1.111(b) of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The Community Development Department shall have the authority to BP/FM PS, CE approve the following minor changes to the project that (1) modify the site plan project by less than 10%, (2) result in a superior site design or appearance, and/or (3) address a construction design issue that is not substantive to the Master Plan of Development. The Planning Commission shall have the final authority to approve any other changes to the Master Plan of Development and any associated Tentative Maps unless appealed to the City Council. 4. Approval of this Conditional Use Permit shall be valid for twelve (12) BP/FM PS months after its effective date. At the end of the period, the approval shall expire and become null and void unless the project has received a building permit. 5. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Ongoing Atascadero or its agents, officers, and employees against any claim or action brought to challenge an approval by the city, or any of its entities, concerning the subdivision. 6. The facility shall meet or exceed all standards as required by the UBC Ongoing BS/FM and any superseding local ordinances related to building safety and/or fire codes and regulations. ITEM NUMBER: 8 DATE: 6-5-07 Atascadero Planning Commission Staff Report - Community Development Department Conditional Use Permit 2003-0092 Amendment Colony Park Outdoor BMX Park 5493 Traffic Way (City of Atascadero, Geoff English) SUBJECT: The proposed project, amending Conditional Use Permit (CUP 2003-0092), is a request to replace the rear paved parking lot for the Mobley's Indoor Skate Park with an outdoor BMX park; and a request to reduce the approved 26 on-site parking spaces to 12 spaces. RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends: The Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. PC 2007-0046 approving Conditional Use Permit 2003-0092 subject to the findings, conditions and exhibits as attached. SITUATION AND FACTS: 1. Applicant: City of Atascadero, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 2. Project Address: 5493 Traffic Way, Atascadero, CA 93422 (APN 028-361-033) 3. General Plan Designation: Industrial ( I ) 4. Zoning District: Industrial ( I ) 5. Existing Use: Outdoor BMX park and indoor skating facility 6. Environmental Status: Consistent with Certified Mitigated Negative Declaration # 2005-0050 STAFF ANALYSIS: 1. Project Summary: The proposed Conditional Use Permit Amendment consists of a request to replace the rear parking with an outdoor BMX track on the existing asphalt; and a request to reduce the required on-site parking. CUP 2003-0092 originally permitted an indoor youth and community recreation center at an existing 9,800 square foot warehouse facility, and 26 on-site parking spaces, as identified on the CUP site plan. The site is a 0.761 -acre net parcel and is surrounded on each side by industrial and public uses. Immediately adjacent to the proposed site is a public park facility with two sports fields. The permitting of the outdoor BMX park attached to the community recreation center is consistent with the Colony Park Master Plan which has been approved by the City Council and Parks and Recreation Commission. The eastern edge of the site borders Atascadero Creek and has been paved with asphalt for decades. The property is currently occupied and operated by Mobley's. Colony Park Surrounding Land Use and Setting: North: Industrial West: Industrial South: Traffic Way Park East: Atascadero Creek 2. Background: CUP 2003-0092 originally permitted an indoor Youth and Community Recreation Center at an existing 9,800 square foot warehouse facility, and 26 on-site parking spaces. On June 17, 2004, the City Council adopted the Colony Park Master Plan which identifies the proposed project site as an indoor skate park. More recently, the City contracted with Mobley's, a private local business, to operate the indoor skate park facility. Outdoor BMX park ramps were recently constructed by Mobley's without permits. However, Mobley's has agreed to work with staff on bringing the facility into conformance with codes and regulations which requires approval of this Conditional Use Permit Amendment. 3. Design and Appearance: The Conditional Use Permit Amendment requires site design and appearance review. The project includes newly constructed ramps on the rear parking lot. New facade improvements to the existing building were not implemented due to cost constraints and the construction of a new recreation center. The proposed project requests utilization of the buildina as it exists today. Site Plan. Circulation. and Parkin Proposed w/ 12 parking spaces •�/• i i f, • 'y. Z � � ;i b� 01 i' I Itit is=•� is { t /�,/^`\J1 ---- { 01.6 The proposed site design eliminates 14 on-site parking spaces. However, the Planning Commission may modify the parking standards through a Conditional Use Permit approval based upon specific findings of fact that the characteristics of a use or its immediate vicinity do not necessitate the number of parking spaces, type of design, or improvements required and that reduced parking will be adequate to accommodate on the site all parking needs generated by the use. Parking for phase one of Colony includes 149 parking spaces with overflow parking at the proposed swim complex.(See figure below.) LEGEND A SOFTBALL FIELD (200 FT FENCE) B SOFTBALL FIELD (225FT FENCE) C WARM UP AREA D BATTINGCAGES(2) E INDOOR OUTDOOR SKATE AND BMX PARK F OUTDOOR CLIMBING WALL G WATER SPRAY PLAY AREA / H PLAYGROUND (8.12 YEAR OLDS) I PLAYGROUND (UNDER 5 YEARS OLD) J BASEKETBALL COURT K SMALL OUTDOOR STAGE AND AMPHITHEATER SPACE L GROUP PICNIC 8 BBO AREA (50.75 PEOPLE) M OVERHEAD SHADE STRUCTURE N 35' BUFFER WITH TRAILS 8 PICNIC TABLES 0 CONCESSION BUILDING (APPROX 400 SOFT)/ P MASS PARK ENTRY 0 TURN AROUND. DROP OFF 8 PICKUP R LARGE TIMBER CONSTRUCTION PARK AND., RAIL FENCE WITH COLUMNS / S ENTRY 8 TURN -OUT EXIT ONLY / • i T� II 1 II I 3 IIL I II I Phase 1: Colonv Park Source: bfgc Architecture Document dated October 25, 2005 NORTH APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1"=150' General Plan Consistency: The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element Policy 12.2.2: "Establish a community/youth recreation center in the vicinity of downtown". The addition of the outdoor facility also meets the recreation goals set by the General Plan including goals targeted at providing a greater variety of recreation opportunities to City residents. As analyzed above, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. 4. Environmental Determination: The proposed project is consistent with Precise Plan 2005-0185's Certified Mitigated Negative Declaration # 2005-0050. 5. Conditional Use Permit Findings: The Conditional Use Permit process provides the opportunity for the public and the Planning Commission to review land use proposals, including architectural design, site design, landscape, and specific standards of the Zoning Ordinance. There are five standard findings required for the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. It is staff's opinion that all of the following findings can be made for the proposed project, subject to the conditions and exhibits as attached. 1. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan. Staff Comment: The use is consistent with the Industrial Land Use Designation and General Plan Policy 12.2.2. 2. The proposed use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff Comment: As conditioned, the project satisfies all zoning code provisions. 3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in this particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental of injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and the use. Staff Comment: The existing outdoor BMX park will not be detrimental to the general public or working persons health, safety, or welfare. 4. The proposed use will not be inconsistent with the character of the immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development. Staff Comment: The proposed use is compatible with the adjacent Traffic Way Park and, as conditioned, will be consistent with the surrounding uses and neighborhood. 5. The proposed use will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be improved in conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the surrounding neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance with the Land Use Element. Staff Comment: The existing facility and use are consistent with the traffic projections and road improvements anticipated within the General Plan. As conditioned, the existing on-site parking and circulation meets the zoning ordinance requirements. 6. The characteristics of the proposed use or its immediate vicinity do not necessitate the number of parking spaces, type of design, or improvements required by this title and that reduced parking will be adequate to accommodate on the site all parking needs generated by the use. Staff Comment: Although the proposed facility and use are consistent with the Colony Park master site plan, the reduced parking will reduce the overall park parking, resulting in the inability to accommodate parking associated with some of the future park amenities such as the amphitheater, sports courts, play structures, and swimming complex. As conditioned, the proposed project could be approved. CONCLUSION: The proposed City Recreational Center is consistent with the goals and policies established in the General Plan and the Colony Park Master Plan. The project has been conditioned to integrate appropriately within the context of surrounding uses and meets all site development and appearance review requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the proposed outdoor BMX park. ALTERNATIVES: 1. The Planning Commission may add to or modify project conditions for the proposed Amendment to the Conditional Use Permit. 2. The Planning Commission deny the proposed Amendment to the Conditional Use Permit. The Commission must make findings of denial. 3. The Planning Commission may continue the hearing and refer the project back to staff for further analysis. Direction should be given to staff and the applicant on required additional information. PREPARED BY: Mathew Fawcett, Planning Technician Steve McHarris, Deputy Community Development Director ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: Location map Attachment 2: Certified Negative Declaration 2005-0050 Attachment 3: Traffic Analysis Attachment 4: Draft Planning Commission Resolution 2007-0046 Attachment 7: Location Map: 5493 Traffic Way Attachment 2: Certified Negative Declaration 2005-0050 See the following. Attachment 3: Parking Analysis Table 3. Assumed Parking Uses and Spaces Use Assumed Parking Spaces Peak Summer Weekday Recreation Center (12,000 s.f. @ 2 spaces per 1000 s.f.) Basketball Courts (1.5 courts) Amphitheater (capacity of 50 people) Play Structure (capacity of 50 people) Baseball/Soccer Fields (2) Skate Park 24 54 (practices), 36 (games) 20 20 48 (practices), 68 (games) 10 Total Peak Parking: 196 Peak Weekend Day Recreation Center 12,000 s.f. @ 2 spaces per 1000 s.f. 24 Basketball Courts 1.5 courts 54 (practices), 36(games) Amphitheater (capacity of 50 people) 20 Play Structure (capacity of 50 people) 20 Baseball/Soccer Fields 2 48 (practices), 136(games) Skate Park 10 Total Peak Parking: 264 Typical Weekday Recreation Center 12,000 s.f. @ 1 space per 1000 s.f. 12 Basketball Courts 1.5 courts 32 (practices), 36(games) Amphitheater not used formal) 0 Play Structure used by 25 people) 10 Baseball/Soccer Fields 2 48 (practices), 68(games) Skate Park assumed low use 0 Total Peak Parkin :126 Source: Orosz Engineering Group, Inc. Attachment 4: Draft Planning Commission Resolution 2007-0046 DRAFT RESOLUTION PC 2007-0046 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO PERMIT AN OUTDOOR BMX PARK IN THE INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT (APN 028-361-033) (PLN 2099-0730 Amendment to CUP 2003-0092: 5493 Traffic Way, City Recreation Center) WHEREAS, An application has been received from the City of Atascadero, 6907 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA (Applicant) to consider Amendment to Conditional Use Permit 2003-0092 to permit an outdoor BMX park; and, WHEREAS, the proposed project is located within the I (Industrial) land use designation of the City of Atascadero's General Plan Land Use Diagram; and, WHEREAS, the proposed project is located within the Industrial (I) zoning district where an indoor recreational use is subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit; and, WHEREAS, consistent with Certified Mitigated Negative Declaration # 2005-0050; and, WHEREAS, the characteristics of the proposed use or its immediate vicinity do not necessitate the number of parking spaces, type of design, or improvements required by this title and that reduced parking will be adequate to accommodate on the site all parking needs generated by the use; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the proposed amendment to Conditional Use Permit 2003-0092 application on June 5, 2007 at 7:00 p.m., and considered testimony and reports from staff, the applicants, and the public; and, NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission takes the following actions: SECTION 1. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. The Planning Commission finds as follows: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan; and, 2. The proposed project satisfies all applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance; and, 3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in this particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use; and, 4. The proposed project will not be inconsistent with the character of the immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development; and, 5. The proposed project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be improved in conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the surrounding neighborhood that would result from the full development in accordance with the Land Use Element. 6. The characteristics of the proposed use or its immediate vicinity do not necessitate the number of parking spaces, type of design, or improvements required by the municipal code and the reduced parking will be adequate to accommodate on the site all parking needs generated by the use, as conditioned. SECTION 2. APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. The Planning Commission does hereby approve PLN 2099-0730 an Amendment to Conditional Use Permit 2003-0092 to establish an outdoor BMX park at 5493 Traffic Way, Atascadero, CA. (APN 028-361-033), consistent with the following Exhibits: EXHIBIT A: Conditions of Approval EXHIBIT B: Site Plan Proposed EXHIBIT C: Photographs of Building Elevations On motion by Commissioner , and seconded by Commissioner the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: ( ) NOES: ABSENT: ( ) ABSTAIN: ( ) ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA Joan O'Keefe Planning Commission Chairperson Attest: Warren M. Frace Planning Commission Secretary EXHIBIT A: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PLN 2099-0730 Amendment to CUP 2003-0092 Condition of Approval Timing Responsibility PLN 2099-0730 Amendment to CUP 2003-0092 /Monitoring PS: Planning Services BL: Business License BS: Building Services BP: Building Permit FD: Fire Department TO: Temporary Occupancy PD: Police Department F0: Final Occupancy CE: City Engineer WW: Wastewater CA: City Attorney Standard Conditions 1. The approval of this Amendment to CUP 2003-0092 shall On Going PS become final and effective for the purposes of issuing building permits, provided the required conditions of approval have been satisfied, fourteen (14) days following the Planning Commission approval unless prior to the time, an appeal to the decision is filed as set forth in Section 9-1.111(b) of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Approval of this Amendment to Conditional Use Permit 2003- On Going PS 0092 shall be valid for twelve (12) months after its effective date. At the end of the period, the approval shall expire and become null and void unless the applicant has received a building permit or applied for an extension of entitlement. 3. The granting of this Amendment to Conditional Use Permit On Going PS 2003-0092 shall apply to APN 028-361-033, regardless of owner. Project Conditions 1. The Community Development Department shall have the authority to BP PS approve minor changes to the project that (1) result in a superior site design or appearance, and/or (2) address a construction design issue that is not substantive to the Conditional Use Permit, (3) Adjust project intensity <10%). 2. Fire lane stripping shall be painted on the asphalt at the side and rear BP FD/PS of the building; no structures or obstructions shall be placed or encroach within the striped area. Striping shall be subject to fire department approval. 3. The Community Services department shall identify additional parking BP CS/PS spaces prior to adding/constructing any new trip -generating Colony Park facilities such as the amphitheater, sports courts, or the swim complex. 4. The rear perimeter property line shall be surveyed and fence placed BP CS/PW along property line by the City Community Services Department. EXHIBIT B: Proposed Site Plan PLN 2099-0730 Amendment to CUP 2003-0092 ^' AT"C"Mo CMUK RAM p/off / /�inrts Him N SMITING COYYERCYL UU 11 INI Q \ O • / 1 • ♦ .ccns � E(1 KYESSi01F a•a. v: `�` � � ivr(Z ro aEVAn 1 � � � E 1 1 1 � 1 1 I1 / EAETRIO ;t1 _� r COYYERCUM use I / I .. J • N� y � EXHIBIT B: Photographs of Building Elevations PLN 2099-0730 Amendment to CUP 2003-0092