HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC_2011-08-02_AgendaPacketCITY OF ATASCADERO
PLANNING COMMISSION A GENDA
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, August 2, 2011 — 7:00 P.M.
City Hall
Council Chambers
6907 El Camino Real
Atascadero, California
CALL TO ORDER
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call: Chairperson Bentz
Vice Chairperson Ward
Commissioner Colamarino
Commissioner Cooper
Commissioner Dariz
Commissioner Schmidt
Commissioner Wingett
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
PUBLIC COMMENT
(This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Commission on any matter not
on this agenda and over which the Commission has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to three minutes.
Please state your name and address for the record before making your presentation. The Commission may
take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda)
PLANNING COMMISSION BUSINESS
CONSENT CALENDAR
(All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and non -controversial by City Staff and will
be approved by one motion if no member of the Commission or public wishes to comment or ask questions.)
1. APPROVAL OF ACTION MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING ON JUNE 7, 2011.
racebook
Facebhttp://www.facebook.com/pages/City-of-Atascadero-Planning/175544509158142
City of Atascadero Planning Commission Agenda
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORTS
None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
DISCLOSURE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS:
Regular Meeting, August 2, 2011
Page 2 of 4
Prior to a project hearing Planning Commission Members must disclose any communications they have had on any
quasi-judicial agenda items. This includes, but is not limited to, Tentative Subdivision Maps, Parcel Maps,
Variances, Conditional Use Permits, and Planned Development Permits. This does not disqualify the Planning
Commission Member from participating and voting on the matter, but gives the public and applicant an opportunity
to comment on the ex parte communication.
(For each of the following items, the public will be given an opportunity to speak. After a staff report, the Chair will open the public
hearing and invite the applicant or applicant's representative to make any comments. Members of the public will be invited to provide
testimony to the Commission following the applicant. Speakers should state their name and address for the record and can address the
Commission for three minutes. After all public comments have been received, the public hearing will be closed, and the Commission
will discuss the item and take appropriate action(s).)
2. PLN 2009-1323, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR 5185 VENADO AVE
Property Owner:
Randall Kenney, 5185 Venado Ave., Atascadero, CA 93422
Applicant:
Travis Kenney, 5185 Venado Ave., Atascadero, CA 93422
Project Title:
PLN 2009-1323 / CUP 2009-0240
Project
5185 Venado Ave., Atascadero, CA 93422
Location:
San Luis Obispo County (APN 030-251-005)
Project
The proposed project consists of an application to allow a 4,575 square foot (sf)
Description:
oversized accessory structure in the Residential Single -Family (RSF-Z) zone.
General Plan Designation: SFR -Z Zoning District: RSF-Z
No environmental determination has been made on this application at this time. Since
Proposed
staff is recommending denial, the application is exempt from the CEQA process. Should
Environmental
the Planning Commission recommend approval of the project, staff would need to make
Determination:
an environmental determination to move forward.
Staff is recommending denial of the Conditional Use Permit.
Staff
Recommendation:
2A. ATTACHMENT 6 OF STAFF REPORT
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS AND REPORTS
DIRECTOR'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for August 16, 2011, at City
Hall, Council Chambers, 6907 El Camino Real, Atascadero.
Please note: Should anyone challenge in court any proposed development entitlement listed
on this Agenda, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public
In
`aceb°oo
Facebk http://www.facebook.com/pages/City-of-Atascadero-Planning/175544509158142
City of Atascadero Planning Commission Agenda
Regular Meeting, August 2, 2011
Page 3 of 4
hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning
Commission at, or prior to this public hearing.
rind Facelbn htt //www.facebook.com/pages/City-of-Atascadero-Planning/175544509158142
Faceboak ��
City of Atascadero Planning Commission Agenda Regular Meeting, August 2, 2011
Page 4 of 4
City of Atascadero
WELCOME TO THE ATASCA DERO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
The Planning Commission meets in regular session on the first and third Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. at City
Hall, Council Chambers, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero. Matters are considered by the Commission in the order
of the printed Agenda.
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on
file in the office of the Community Development Department and are available for public inspection during City Hall
business hours at the Front Counter of City Hall, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, and on our website,
www.atascadero.org. An agenda packet is also available for public review at the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro
Road. All documents submitted by the public during Commission meetings that are either read into the record or
referred to in their statement will be noted in the minutes and available for review in the Community Development
Department. Commission meetings are video-taped and audio recorded, and may be reviewed by the public. Copies
of meeting recordings are available for a fee. Contact the City Clerk for more information (470-3400).
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City
meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office or the City Clerk's Office,
both at (805) 470-3400. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will
assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or
service.
TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA
Under Agenda item, "PUBLIC COMMENT", the Chairperson will call for anyone from the audience having business
with the Commission to approach the lectern and be recognized.
1. Give your name for the record (not required)
2. State the nature of your business.
3. All comments are limited to 3 minutes.
4. All comments should be made to the Chairperson and Commission.
5. No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any
other individual, absent or present.
This is when items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Commission's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes will
be allowed for Public Comment Portion (unless changed by the Commission).
TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS (from Title 2, Chapter 1 of the Atascadero Municipal Code)
Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Chairperson will identify the subject, staff will
give their report, and the Commission will ask questions of staff. The Chairperson will announce when the public
comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the Commission regarding the matter being
considered to step up to the lectern. If you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way:
1. You must approach the lectern and be recognized by the Chairperson.
2. Give your name (not required).
3. Make your statement.
4. All comments should be made to the Chairperson and Commission.
5. No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any
other individual, absent or present.
6. All comments limited to 3 minutes.
If you wish to use a computer presentation to support your comments, you must notify the Community Development
Department at 470-3402 at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Digital presentations brought to the meeting on a
USB drive or CD is preferred. Access to hook up your laptop to the City's projector can also be provided. You are
required to submit to the Recording Secretary a printed copy of your presentation for the record. Please check in with
the Recording Secretary before the meeting begins to announce your presence and turn in the printed copy.
The Chairperson will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public
comments will be heard by the Commission.
®Find ebb
Facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/City-of-Atascadero-Planning/175544509158142
ITEM NUMBER: 1
DATE: 8-2-11
CITY OF A TA SCA DERO
PLANNING COMMISSION
DRAFT ACTION MINUTES
Regular Meeting — Tuesday, June 7, 2011 — 7:00 P.M.
City Hall Council Chambers
6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, California
CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 p.m.
Chairperson Bentz called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and Commissioner Schmidt
led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Colamarino, Cooper, Dariz, Schmidt, Wingett, Vice
Chairperson Ward, and Chairperson Bentz
Absent: None
Others Present: Recording Secretary Annette Manier
Staff Present: Community Development Director Warren Frace and Assistant
Planner Alfredo Castillo
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: By Vice Chairperson Ward and seconded by
Commissioner Colamarino to approve the agenda.
Motion passed 7:0 by a roll -call vote.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
PC Draft Action Minutes of 6/7/11
Page 1 of 3
PLANNING COMMISSION BUSINESS
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. APPROVAL OF ACTION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING ON APRIL 19, 2011.
2. APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP 2011-0175 FOR 11750 AND 11800 SANTA
LUCIA ROAD (CAM PBELL/FOLDBERG/TWIN CITIES SURVEYS)
MOTION: By Commissioner Colamarino and seconded by Vice
Chairperson Ward to approve the Consent Calendar.
Motion passed 7:0 by a roll -call vote.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORTS
3. NATIVE TREE MITIGATION REPLANTING PROGRAM UPDATE REPORT
Community Development Director Warren Frace gave an overview of the Native Tree
Ordinance Replanting Program and introduced Cory Meyer and Joan O'Keefe from the
Atascadero Native Tree Association (ANTA). Assistant Planner Castillo gave the staff
report, handed out a map to show where native tree plantings have occurred (Exhibit A),
and stated that this information is also available on ANTA's website. Director Frace and
Assistant Planner Castillo answered questions from the Commission.
There was discussion on what can be done to spend the money in the ANTA account
on hand; can we do something more ambitious? Director Frace answered the
Commission's questions, and will meet with Cory, Joan, and staff to discuss some ideas
on what we could do.
PUBLIC COMMENT
The following people spoke during public comment: Cory Meyer and Joan O'Keefe.
Mr. Meyer and Ms. O'Keefe answered questions from the Commission.
Chairperson Bentz closed the Public Comment period.
PC Draft Action Minutes of 6/7/11
Page 2 of 3
PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS AND REPORTS
None
DIRECTORS REPORT
• Director Frace gave an update on the Walmart/Annex project and the issues with
the interchange structure, which is unresolved, and will be on the next City
Council agenda. Once this issue is resolved, the project can go to a Planning
Commission public hearing.
• Director Frace gave an update on the Eagle Ranch project which is moving
ahead. The applicant will contact the Commission in July for private tours and
this will not be a public meeting. There may be some public workshops in the
Fall. Archeology is a significant component of this project.
ADJOURNMENT - 8:06 p.m.
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for June 21, 2011,
at City Hall, Council Chambers, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero.
MINUTES PREPARD BY:
Annette Manier, Recording Secretary
The following exhibit is available in the Community Development Department:
Exhibit A — Atascadero Native Tree Replanting Handout
Ilcityhalllcdvlpmntl— pc minuteslpc minutes 111pc draft actn minutes 6 7 11.am.docx
PC Draft Action Minutes of 6/7/11
Page 3 of 3
ITEM NUMBER: 2
DATE: 8-2-11
Atascadero Planning Commission
Staff Report - Community Development Department
Alfredo R. Castillo, AICP, Assistant Planner, 470-3436, acastillo@atascadero.org
PLN 2009-1323
Conditional Use Permit 2009-0240
Oversized Accessory Structure
5185 Venado Road
(Kenney)
SUBJECT:
The proposed project consists of an application to allow a 4,575 square foot (sf)
oversized, detached accessory structure in the Residential Single -Family (RSF-Z) zone.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff Recommends:
Planning Commission adopt PC Resolution 2011-0015 denying, without prejudice, PLN
2009-1323 / Conditional Use Permit 2009-0240 based on findings and direct the
applicant to work with staff on options to bring the property and structure into
compliance.
Situation and Facts
1. Applicant: Travis Kenney, 5185 Venado Avenue, Atascadero, CA
93422
2. Property Owner: Randall Kenney, 5185 Venado Avenue, Atascadero, CA
93422
3. Project Address: 5185 Vendado Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422
APN 030-251-005
4. General Plan Designation: Single -Family Residential (SFR -Z)
5. Zoning District: Residential Single -Family (RSF-Z)
6. Site Area:
7. Existing Use:
8. Environmental Status
DISCUSSION:
1.85 acres
Single -Family Residential
Exempt due to recommendation for denial
Background
In October 2006, staff received a code violation compliant alleging that a building shell
and foundation were being constructed at 5185 Venado Ave. City Staff verified that no
construction permits had been issued, and on October 27, 2006 issued a Stop Work
Notice to the property owner to cease all work on the building due to lack of permits.
In November 2006, City staff met with Travis Kenney (the applicant and tenant) to
discuss the Stop Work Order and how to bring the structure to compliance. The
applicant submitted a building permit (BLD 2006-6916) for permission to finish
construction of a 4,575 sf accessory storage building. City staff issued corrections and
requested additional information including the requirement for a CUP. The City received
an additional Code compliant in January of 2007 for traffic and noise related to the
structure and a potential business being run out of it. City staff issued another written
notice of building code violation to the applicant for the structure being constructed
without permits and the lack of abating the code violation.
In August 2008, City Staff met with the applicant to discuss a Conditional Use Permit
(CUP) application. Based on the initial building plan submittal in 2006, staff determined
that a CUP was needed because of the size of the structure. The applicant assured staff
that he would finish the CUP application and resubmit building plans.
Due to the lack of progress in remedying the situation, City Staff notified the applicant of
an impending Notice of Non -Compliance lien to be placed on the property if no action
was taken to remedy the situation. On October 29, 2008, Staff filed a Notice of Non -
Compliance and placed a lien on the subject property due to the lack of submitted
building plans or action to remove the structure.
The City received an additional code complaint in March of 2009. The code complaint
discussed the non -permitted structure and also claimed that an auto salvage and
vehicle repair business was on-site. The complainant alleged numerous tow truck
deliveries that would block the street creating a traffic hazard. In response, a letter is
sent to the property owner and applicant warning them to come into compliance or face
the possibility of "Unsafe and Unlawful" placard placed (Red Tag) on the structure.
The applicant formally submitted for a Conditional Use Permit in March of 2009. Staff
reviewed the application and deemed it "incomplete" due to the lack of information
needed to process the application. In June 2009, the applicant met with City staff on
moving forward based on comments provided by staff.
In March and November of 2010, the Applicant re -submitted for additional plan checks.
At the request of the applicant, City staff met with the applicant and his consultants to
discuss issues regarding the plan checks and staff's concerns with the structure and its
size.
1
On May 31, 2011, the City received a code compliant alleging that the applicants had
finished the exterior of the building during the 2011 Memorial Day Weekend. In addition
to finishing the building, in violation of the Stop Work Order, the complaint alleged
regular tow truck traffic bringing wrecked vehicles to the subject property's driveway that
effect neighborhood traffic creating traffic hazards. On June 1, 2011, City Staff placed
an "Unsafe and Unlawful" placard on the unpermitted structure that was completed as
alleged in the complaint during a site visit.
Due to the numerous complaints, the size of the structure, the potential auto salvage
use and the applicant's disregard for the City's regulations as demonstrated by the
completion of the structure without permits, Staff has no other option than to bring this
project to the Planning Commission for review and direction.
Surroundina Land Use and Settin
North: Residential Single Family (RSF-Z)
South: Residential Single Family (RSF-Z)
East: Residential Single Family (RSF-Z)
West: Residential Single Family (RSF-Z)
ANALYSIS:
The proposed project consists of a request to allow for an oversized accessory structure
at 5185 Venado Avenue. Residential accessory structures are defined in the
Atascadero Municipal Code (AMC) 9-6.106(b) as "any detached accessory structure
intended for residential accessory uses and accessory storage." Section 9-6.106 of the
AMC provides a clear regulatory framework on the placement and size requirements for
these structures.
9-6.106 Residential Accessory Uses
(1) Limits on Use. An accessory structure may be constructed or used solely for noncommercial
hobbies or amusements; for maintenance of the principal structure or yards; for artistic endeavors
such as painting, photography or sculpture; maintenance or mechanical work on vehicles
owned or operated by the occupants; for an approved home occupation; or for other similar
purposes.
(2) Floor Area. The gross floor area of a detached accessory structure is not to exceed fifty percent
(50%) of the gross floor area of the principal structure.
The gross floor area of the principal dwelling (house) is 2,070 sf. The gross floor area of
the proposed structure is 4,575 sf, which exceeds the allowable threshold of residential
accessory structures. Therefore, the applicant is applying for a CUP.
;es
7.1
- -_. .ig:ing Lot tine
��118 � \ gravel parking -
oQ
4`
h
42" oak
House fo a grade
' tee] beam
/42'Apni, f,
jCOaC- i
slab f
brick -- .� '--�. ' b ,W grade
4. potfa steey beam
rade
�I beorn
1 , �
Existing Site Conditions
The site is approximately 1.85 acres in size. The site slopes upwards with an average
slope of approximately 10 percent. There is an existing single-family residence on site
near the top of the ridge's crest. There are numerous oak trees on the site, especially
on the downside of the ridge to the east.
There were a substantial number of wrecked and/or inoperable vehicles either on site or
located on the adjacent vacant lot during a site inspection on June 9, 2011. The number
of abandoned vehicles are in violation of AMC's accessory storage standards on a
residential lot.
The AMC states the following:
W
!U3 A ccessory Jtora e
(3) Automobiles Stored in Residential Areas. The storage of inoperative vehicles in a residential zone
is limited to one vehicle when stored outdoors. Such storage may be located only where it is
within the buildable area of the site. Inoperative vehicles may be abated as set forth in Chapter 9-
8. Storage of such vehicles within an approved accessory building (Section 9-6.106) is not subject
to limitation on the number of vehicles.
During the June 9, 2011 site visit, staff encountered nine (9) inoperative vehicles on
site, with an additional vehicle on the adjacent lot.
Oil
In addition to the abandoned vehicles, the applicant was storing large quantities of auto
parts and other materials outside of the proposed structure. These parts, although
appearing clean, may contain hazardous material other chemicals that could run off-site
during a major storm event. The abandoned vehicles, coupled with the additional
storage and parts are in violation of AMC's accessory storage standards for scrap and
junk.
9-6.10
.5 Accessory Ntora e
(f) Scrap and Junk. The outdoor storage of scrap, junk and miscellaneous articles and
materials accessory to another use is limited to a maximum area of two hundred (200) square feet,
with a maximum height of five (5) feet unless such storage is entirely within a six (6) foot high
solid wood or masonry fence or within a building. Such storage shall be located only where it is
within the buildable area of the lot. The storage of scrap and junk as a principal use is subject to
the standards of Section 9-6.131. (Ord. 68 § 9-6.103, 1983)
Proposed Accessory Structure
The applicant has constructed a 4,575 square foot accessory structure within the
Residential Single -Family (RSF-Z) zone. The structure is a steel frame building with
corrugated metal siding that is approximately 25 -feet in height. The length of the
structure is approximately 120 -feet and approximately 40 -feet in width. The structure
has three roll -up doors that provide access to vehicles to enter and exit the structure.
The structure itself has additional main doors for ingress and egress at the rear and
sides. The structure includes a large steel frame that cantilevers a slope apparently for
a deck.
The accessory structure is built at the top of the ridge, approximately 12 -feet from the
point where the ridge begins to downslope towards the Ardilla Road neighborhood. The
back of the structure is well hidden due to the tree canopies that surround the proposed
structure.
The structure was built over the existing property line by approximately 10 feet to the
north. The applicant has applied for a Lot Line Adjustment (LLA) to rectify this situation.
The neighboring property owner (Kent Kenney) is a member of the applicant's family
and is a willing participant in the LLA.
The structure was also constructed too close to the existing residence. The AMC
requires accessory structures to be placed with at least 6 -feet from the principal
residence or as required by the Building Code. With the accessory structure closer than
the minimum standard, a fire rated wall nearest the home would need to be placed in
the accessory structure consistent with the California Building Code.
The applicant has shown in previous plan checks attempts to connect the proposed
accessory structure to the existing home to avoid a CUP. In each instance, the applicant
has failed to meet City requirements to attach the structure to the existing residence, in
order to make the structure an addition rather than a new building on the site. Staff has
citied Community Development Department Policy #14 that states "additions must have
a continuous logical internal connection of conditioned space that provides for access to
all portions of the primary structure." The applicant has yet to meet this condition nor did
the applicant make the needed connection when the applicant finished the shell of the
building.
Staff does not believe the structure should be considered an addition due to its size,
bulk, appearance and use. Staff is recommending a CUP be required for any
configuration of this building.
Based on aerial photography, it appears that some native trees were removed without
permits and significant grading had occurred in order to place the structure in the
location it is in. The applicant obtained an Arborist Report that was requested by staff as
a part of the corrections issued for both the building plan submittal and the CUP
submittal. The Arborist Report examined 16 native trees within 20 -feet of the
construction site, consistent with the City's Municipal Code.
The Arborist Report noted that 9 of the 16 native trees were impacted due to the
placement of the building, either through the placement of fill from unpermitted grading
activities or the grading itself. The report notes that a 42 -inch Coast Live Oak has been
50% impacted due to fill. The report is unclear whether the tree will survive due to the
construction activities.
Building Occupancy Classification
Building occupancy classifications refer to categorizing structures based on their usage
and is primarily used for building and fire code enforcement. Typically on a residential
parcel there are two types of building occupancies: "R" -Residential and "U" -Utility and
Miscellaneous. The "R" occupancy refers to residential structures, which include the
311.1 Storage Group S. Storage Group S occupancy includes,
among others, the use of a building or structure, or a portion
thereof, for storage that is not classified as a hazardous occu-
pancy.
311.2 Moderate -hazard storage, Group S-1. Buildings
occupied for storage uses that are not classified as Group S-2,
including, but not limited to, storage of the following:
Aerosols, Levels 2 and 3
Aircraft hangar (storage and repair)
Bags: cloth, burlap and paper
Bamboos and rattan
Baskets
Belting: canvas and leather
Books and paper in rolls or packs
Boots and shoes
Buttons, including cloth covered, pearl or bone
Cardboard and cardboard boxes
Clothing, woolen wearing apparel
Cordage
Dry boat storage (indoor)
Furniture
Furs
Glues, mucilage, pastes and size
Grains
Horns and combs, other than celluloid
Leather
Linoleum
Lumber
Motor vehicle repair garages complying with the maximum
allowable quantities of hazardous materials listed in
Table 3£17.1(1) (see Section 406.6)
Photo engravings
Resilient flooring
Silks
Soaps
Sugar
Tires, bulk storage of
Tobacco, cigars, cigarettes and snuff
Upholstery and mattresses
Wax candles
entire house. The "U" occupancy
typically refers to a garage or other
accessory structure that lack
conditioned space (or the lack of
heating/air conditioning). In the
residential zones, buildings on must
fall into one of these categories.
The proposed accessory structure at
the subject property is classified
under the "S" (Storage) occupancy
due to the large size of the building.
Section 311 of the 2010 California
Building Code (CBC) classifies "S"
occupancies in Table 1.
From this CBC list, the majority of
these storage uses are not
considered "allowed" in any of the
City's residential zones. Based on
site visits and site conditions of the
proposed accessory structure, the
closest intended use for the structure
is the motor vehicle repair garage.
Based on the structures size, fire
sprinklers are required and have not
been installed. The applicant has yet
to provide the City with requested
letter from the Atascadero Mutual
Water Company stating the minimum
design water pressure available for a
fiire sprinkler system to the building. It
is staff's concern that the pressure
necessary for the fire sprinklers would
necessitate a substantial upgrade to the existing residential water system.
Use of Accessory Structure
Based on the occupancy load for the proposed building, the numerous abandoned and
inoperable vehicles, number of auto parts on-site, staff firmly believes that an "auto
repair and service" use is being established at the subject property. Staff issued a
correction to the applicant as a part of their initial CUP in 2009 because the building
plans identified "Hollywoods Hot Rods" as the client. The AMC defines "auto repair and
service" as the following:
9-3.70
Land Use Descriptions
Auto Repair and Services. Service establishments primarily engaged in the repair, alteration,
painting, washing or waxing of automobiles. May also include rental of cars, trucks or trailers;
leasing of cars and trucks. Does not include repair shops which are subordinate to and maintained
by a vehicle dealership
Staff notified the applicant that "auto maintenance, repair, salvage, etc. for commercial
purposes is not allowed as a home occupation business, and cannot be permitted on
the subject site as it is within a residential single family zone" (PLN 2009-1323
Corrections, 5/09).
A recent internet search of "Hollywoods Hot Rods" had multiple listings here in
Atascadero with the subject property as the address of the business. Other listings
show a similar business name at 6915 Sycamore Road in Atascadero, however, no
business license is on file with the City at this location. The applicant has yet to clarify if
they indeed operate a business at either the subject property or at the 6915 Sycamore
Road address.
re in
Findings for a Conditional Use Permit
The Planning Commission must make the following five findings in order to approve a
CUP for an oversized accessory structure. The findings for the CUP are individually
analyzed below:
1. The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan.
Staff Comment: An oversized accessory structure is consistent with the Single
Family Residential (SFR) designation. Staff believes that an automotive repair
and services use would be established if the proposed structure is permitted with
approval of the CUP. This use is inconsistent with the City's General Plan as this
designation is intended for low density housing due to the various environmental
conditions such as steep topography and oak woodlands.
2. The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Title (Zoning
Ordinance).
Staff Comment: The City's Zoning Ordinance allows for an oversized accessory
structure with approval of a CUP. Staff believes that an automotive repair and
services will be or has been established with the building's construction. Auto
maintenance, repair, salvage, etc. for commercial purposes is not allowed as a
home occupation business, and cannot be permitted on the subject site as it is
within a residential single family zone.
The structure was constructed over the existing property line. The applicant has
applied for a lot line adjustment, however the adjustment has not been approved.
The structure was completed with less than 6 -feet in separation from the existing
residential home. A fire rated wall is needed in the proposed structure for
consistency with the City's Code and the California Building Code. Finally, the
structure requires fire sprinklers to be installed. The applicant has yet to address
the fire sprinkler issue at this time.
Based on the lack of satisfaction of all applicable provisions of the Zoning
Ordinance coupled with Staff's site visits, internet listings, numerous vehicles on-
site and on the adjacent empty lot, staff cannot recommend that the structure is
consistent with all applicable provisions of the City's Zoning Ordinance.
3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not,
because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons residing
or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property
or improvements in the vicinity of the use.
Staff Comment: The proposed accessory structure, primarily finished in violation
of the City's "Stop Work" order potentially poses a safety hazard to the subject
property and surrounding neighborhood due to the lack of a fire suppression
system that is required for this type of structure, as well as, the apparent use of
the structure as an automotive repair shop that may store hazardous chemicals
and other waste generated by either a business or as a hobby.
4. That the proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the character or the
immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development.
Staff Comment: The proposed oversized accessory structure is inconsistent with
the character of the immediate neighborhood due to the large size of the building
coupled with the use of corrugated metal. This type of building is typically suited
for development in a more light industrial setting rather than a low density
residential neighborhood. Although the oak trees in the rear of the property help
to break up the blank rear fagade, the front elevation of the building can still be
seen from the right-of-way making the building stand out comparative to other
residential homes and accessory structures in the neighborhood.
5. That the proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the
safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be
improved in conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the
surrounding neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance
with the Land Use Element.
Staff Comment: Staff has received code complaints alleging numerous deliveries
of vehicles that block Venado Road and access to resident's homes because of
these deliveries and the need for the tow trucks to prepare to go up a steep
driveway to the proposed structure. Residents have complained that these
deliveries are causing potential traffic hazards, particularly on a curve adjacent to
the subject property.
Based on staff analysis, it does not appear that the Planning Commission can make any
of the five required findings. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the
required findings for denial of the Conditional Use Permit request, without prejudice.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
No environmental determination has been made on this application at this time. Since
staff is recommending denial, the application is exempt from the CEQA process. Should
the Planning Commission recommend approval of the project, staff would need to make
an environmental determination to move forward and may need to return the item back
to the Planning Commission for future consideration.
CONCLUSION:
Based on staff analysis, the requested CUP does not meet required findings for
approval. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the required findings
for denial of the CUP request, without prejudice.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. The Commission could direct Staff to re-agendize the project for approval with
the appropriate environmental determination. The Planning Commission must
make the required findings to approve this project and can make additional
modifications and/ or provide staff with conditions of approval.
2. The Commission may determine that more information is needed on some
aspect of the project and may refer the item back to the applicant and staff to
develop the additional information. The Commission should clearly state the type
of information that is required and move to continue the item to a future date.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1:
Location Map, General Plan, and Zoning
Attachment 2:
Aerial Photo
Attachment 3:
Proposed Site Plan
Attachment 4:
Site Photos
Attachment 5:
Draft Resolution PC 2011-0015
Attachment 6:
Memorandum, 5185 Venado Ave. Case
History/Timeline
Attachment 1: Location Map, General Plan and Zoning
r`=(� • ` +�r� J ..., it �
/91I
a
s
Y ,• i
Attachment 3: Proposed Site Plan
''w
9g
�R
3
IM!
.��� i •
h' { �. �4,
BE
Vie.
-'7=
3c'< J
� �
t
a 6
e�g� a Ea
y5#j 5$
Ag�j® gE{5 a
lady 81 $$ e
�s --
� • t
fJ
''w
�R
1
na I
I s-,
Vie.
-'7=
3c'< J
'
a 6
e�g� a Ea
y5#j 5$
Ag�j® gE{5 a
lady 81 $$ e
— AM
iAleV'�,
_ i4►.
"VI
Attachment 4: Site Photos
4����: �'�� ��
�� .� �
�T-ri '�ae � -a
r :i� �, �:� _-
-__
._ `:moi,'•; .,�4 ,�.
'11 Y
�=
., 1.
'� -
�' r~� T Y �� � r
'� +.
��
,� ! r, �
�,. .�..4
Attachment 5: Draft PC Resolution
DRAFT RESOLUTION PC 2011-0015
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST TO ALLOW AN
OVERSIZED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE, APN 030-251-005
(5185 Venado / Kenney)
WHEREAS, an application has been received from the applicant, Travis Kenney (5185
Venado Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422), and property owner, Randall Kenney (5185 Venado
Avenue, Atascadero, CA) to consider a Conditional Use Permit for an oversized structure at
5185 Venado on APN 030-251-006; and,
WHEREAS, the project is exempt from the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15270, Projects Which Are Disapproved;
and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing
on August 2, 2011; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, hereby
resolves to take the following actions:
SECTION 1. Findings of Disapproval. The Planning Commission finds that:
(i) The Conditional Use Permit does not meet the required five (5) findings consistent
with 9-2.110(b)(3)(iv) of the City of Atascadero Municipal Code due to the following:
WHEREAS, Staff an automotive repair and services use would be established if the
proposed structure is permitted with approval of the CUP. This use is inconsistent with
the City's General Plan as this designation is intended for low density housing due to the
various environmental conditions such as steep topography and oak woodlands;
WHEREAS, An Auto maintenance, repair, salvage, etc. for commercial purposes is not
allowed as a home occupation business, and cannot be permitted on the subject site as it
is within a residential single family zone;
WHEREAS, the oversized accessory structure lacks satisfaction of all applicable
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance;
WHEREAS, the oversized accessory structure, potentially poses a safety hazard to the
subject property and surrounding neighborhood due to the lack of a fire suppression
system that is required for this type of structure;
WHEREAS, the oversized accessory structure is inconsistent with the character of the
immediate neighborhood due to the large size of the building;
WHEREAS, approval of the oversized accessory structures will increase neighborhood
traffic due to deliveries over automobiles causing potential traffic hazards, particularly on
a curve adjacent to the subject property.
SECTION 2. Denial. The Planning Commission does hereby deny Conditional Use Permit
2009-0240, without prejudice to allow a 4,575 square feet oversized accessory structure on APN
030-251-006 (5185 Venado Avenue).
The applicant may submit a revised project for Planning Commission consideration under the
existing CUP application and prior to the one (1) year time limit:
On motion by Commissioner , and seconded by Commissioner the foregoing
resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote:
AYES: ( )
NOES: ( )
ABSENT: ( )
ABSTAIN: ( )
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA
David Bentz
Planning Commission Chairperson
Attest:
Warren M. Frace
Planning Commission Secretary
CITY OF ATASCADERO
Memorandum
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
(Attachment 6 of Staff Report)
Date: July 27, 2011
To: Planning Commission
Warren Frace, Community Development Department
From: Alfredo R. Castillo, AICP, Assistant Planner
Subject: 5185 Venado Avenue Case History
For your review is a chronological history of the code violation cases currently ongoing
at 5185 Venado Avenue. The enforcement case numbers are as follows: ENF 08-0170
(building codes violation) and ENF 06-0156 (no building permit).
The code violation began in October 2006 with a code violation compliant. The
complainant alleged that the property owner at 5185 Venado (Mr. Randall Kenney) had
constructed a building shell and foundation without permits. Initial building records
show no approved permits for construction of an accessory structure. The following are
events that have occurred since the initial code violation compliant form was signed
and turned into the City.
2006
October 27, 2006 — A Stop Work Notice was sent to the property owner to cease and
desist all work on the building due to lack of permits (Attachment 1). Site photos were
taken. (Attachment 1)
November 7, 2006 — City staff met with Mr. Travis Kenney (applicant) who committed to
the City to draft plans and submit them to the City.
November 9, 2006 — A building permit was submitted (BLD 2006-6916) for permission
to finish construction of a 4,575 square foot (sf) accessory storage building.
November 15, 2006 — City staff issues its 1 s` set of corrections to BLD 2006-6916. The
submittal lacked substantial information. (Attachment 2)
File:\\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- 09 PLNs\PLN 2009-1323 CUP 5185 Venado oversized structure\Memo-Timeline.doc
6907 EL CAMINO REAL • ATASCADERO, CA 93422 • (805) 461-5000 • FAX 461-7612
Print Date: 07/27/
-8
vR
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 2 of 34
2007
January 1, 2007 — City staff contacts the applicant and requires him to resubmit a set of
plans within 15 days or face additional code enforcement.
January 23, 2007 — Staff receives an additional code compliant violation form. The
complaint alleges that the building is too large, and that the building and is intended to
be used as a business in a residential area. Potential noise and neighborhood
compatibility issues are cited.
April 10, 2007 — The Case is transferred from the Building Department to the Fire
Department for further code enforcement action.
April 17, 2007 — The City follows up with the Property Owner with a written notice of
building code violations, specifically California Building Code section 106.2(1),
construction without a permit. (Attachment 3)
2008
August 19, 2008 — City Staff reviews Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application with Mr.
Travis Kenney. Based on the initial building plan submittal in 2007, staff determined
that a CUP was needed because of the size of the structure. Staff explained the CUP
process to Mr. Kenney. The applicant assured staff that he would finish the CUP
application and resubmit building plans.
September 24, 2008 — Staff sends a letter placing the applicant on notice of impending
Notice of Non -Compliance order if no remediation to the code enforcement is
completed. (Attachment 4)
October 29, 2008 — Staff continues to have non-compliance on either resubmittal of
building plans or CUP. Staff files a Notice of Non -Compliance and places a lien on the
property. (Attachment 5)
2009
January 23, 2009 — City staff requests an update of the case for those that are involved
in the ongoing code enforcement case.
March 1, 2009 — Additional code violation complaint received. The code complaint
discusses the non -permitted structure. It claims that an auto salvage/dismantling and
vehicle repair business is occurring on-site. The complainant alleges numerous tow
truck deliveries blocking the street and creating a traffic hazard. In addition, there are
wrecked cars that are parked on the road's shoulder.
File: Memo -Timeline Print Date: 07/27/114:35 PM
-8
vR
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 3 of 34
March 12, 2009 — Staff sends an additional letter to Mr. Randall Kenney warning him to
come into compliance due to additional code violation complaints. Staff warns Mr.
Kenney to resubmit plans or have the possibility of "Unsafe and Unlawful" placard on
the unpermitted structure. (Attachment 6)
March 23, 2009 — Staff receives a foreclosure notice regarding 5185 Venado due to the
lien filed. (Attachment 7)
March 27, 2009 — Mr. Travis Kenney formally submits for a Conditional Use Permit
(PLN 2009-1323). Fees are paid.
April 25, 2009 — Staff deems the application for the CUP "incomplete" per the permit
streamlining act.
May 5, 2009 — Applicant picks up corrections from staff on PLN 2009-1323.
(Attachment 8)
June 17, 2009 — The applicant meets with City Staff members on how to proceed
forward based on corrections issued for the CUP application.
2010
March 9, 2010 — Applicant resubmits plan check #2 for BLD 2006-06916.
(Attachment 9)
April 26, 2010 — Applicant picks up corrections based on plan check #2.
June 6 ,2010 — City Staff follows up with applicant based on plan check #2.
October 25, 2010 — Applicant submits plan check #3 for BLD 2006-06916.
November 5, 2010 — City Staff meets with Mr. Travis Kenney and his consultants to
discuss issues regarding plan check #3 and City's concerns with the structure and its
size being on a residential lot.
November 9, 2010 — Applicant picks up corrections for plan check #3. (Attachment 10)
2011
April 13, 2011 — City Staff begins to formulate letter to be sent to Mr. Randall Kenney to
submit a set of plans or face further code enforcement actions. This letter is never sent
to the applicant.
File: Memo -Timeline Print Date: 07/27/114:35 PM
-8
vR
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 4 of 34
May 31, 2011 — City receives a code compliant violation form indicated that over the
Memorial Day weekend, the applicants had finished the exterior of the building. In
addition to the finished building, in violation of the Stop Work Order issued on
10/27/2006, the compliant indicates regular tow truck traffic bringing wrecked vehicles
to the driveway that effect neighborhood traffic creating a potential traffic hazard.
June 1, 2011 — City Staff issues an "Unsafe and Unlawful" placard on the unpermitted
structure. Staff takes photos of additional violations. (Attachment 11)
June 2, 2011 — Applicant submits and pays fees for Lot Line Adjustment (LLA). This
LLA is need as a part of issued correction to address the unpermitted structure built
over property lines.
Attachment: Attachment 1 — Inspection Correction Notice/Stop Work Notice/Site Photos
Attachment 2 — BLD 2006-6916 Corrections
Attachment 3 — Fire Dept. Letter
Attachment 4 — Building Codes Letter
Attachment 5 — Notice of Non Compliance
Attachment 6 - Notice of Violation Letter dated 3-12-09
Attachment 7 — Foreclosure Notice
Attachment 8 — Corrections
Attachment 9 - Corrections
Attachment 10 — Corrections
Attachment 11 — Additional site photos as of 6-1-11
File: Memo -Timeline Print Date: 07/27/114:35 PM
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 5 of 34
.p�psee°Fno
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Attachment 1
M Y OF ATASCADERO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
❑ BUILDING SERVICES 6907 EI Camino Real
❑ PLANNING SERVICES Office Line (805) 461-5000
INSPECTION CORRECTION NOTICE
Building Inspection Request Line (805)466-8099
Planning Inspection Request Line (805)461-5000
PERMIT # 200 - ADDRESS:
TYPE OF INSPECTION:
WORK DOES NOT COMPLY WITH Atascadeno Municipal Code ,California Codes OR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SET BY PLANNING SERVICES
BUILDING SERVICES ❑ PLANNING SERVICES
STOP WORK — OFFICE COPY
STREET ADDRESS:
W
VIOLATION: &YI
DATE: INSPECTOR:
nATE: PLANNER:
❑ DO NOT PROCEED
❑ NO FURTHER INSPECTION UNTIL ABOVE COMPLETED
❑ RE -FEE WARNING
❑ RECALL INSPECTION
❑ OK WITH ABOVE CORRECTIONS
❑ NO APPROVED PLANS/INSPECTION RECORDS
❑ NO ACCESSIPERMISSION TO ACCESS
INSPECTOR: DATE:
PLANNER: DATE:
❑ CONTACT BUILDING SERVICES ❑ CONTACT PLANNING SERVICES
File: Memo -Tin 1114:35 PM
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 6 of 34
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Attachment 1
File: Memo -Timeline
Print Date: 071271114:35 PM
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 7 of 34
-8
vR
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Attachment 2
13 APPLICANTS COPY 13FILE COPY
�1�" City of Atascadero
Community Development Department / Public Works
°1 Plan Review/Permit Processing
SEISMIC ZONE 4 - CLIMATE ZONE 4 - WIND ZONES 70 M.P.H - EXPOSURE ZONE °B" OR -C"
ZONING ORDINANCE -TREE ORDINANCE-ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE -2001 C.B.C.-2000 C.E.C.-2001 C.F.C.-
ENGINEERING STANDARDS -CALIFORNIA STATE ENERGY COMPLIANCE (TITLE 24)
IMPORTANT
A SET OF YOUR PLANS MAY BE MARKED UP WITH COMMENTS IN RED INK (IN ADDITION
TO THIS LIST). IF SO, IT IS STAMPED ON THE COVER SHEET TO IDENTIFY IT. PLEASE
RETURN THE RED -LINED SET WHEN YOU RESUBMIT. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY DELAY
YOUR PROJECT UNNECESSARILY.
Plan Check Corrections: BLD -2006-6916
Planning Division Corrections Call 470-3470
Plan Checked By: Debra L.
Date of Plan Review: 11.15.2006
1. Please submit a vicinity map.
2. Please submit a residential building record.
3. An arborist report is required to address all construction impacts to native trees on site.
4. Per Municipal Code Section 9-6.106(b2)
(b2)The gross floor arect of a detached accessory structure isnot to exceed fifti, percent (50%) of the gross floor area
of the principal structure,
The proposed structure exceeds the allowed 50% of the principal structure, therefore per Municipal Code
Section 9-6.106(dl ) a Conditional Use Permit is required.
(dl )Detached accessory structures that exceed size reyuiraments are subject to the approval of a minor conditional
use permit.
Please Submit a CUP application with all required documents. An application has been included for your
convenience.
5. Was a portion of the existing (main) structure removed to make way for the proposed accessory structure?
6. Were any trees removed for the construction of the site? If so please apply for apply for a Tree Removal
Permit. Note all removed trees on plans.
Building Division Corrections
Plan Checked By: Ken Forman
Date of Plan Review: November 15, 2006
Call 470-3438
1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan and topo plan to scale showing all structures on the property.
Page 3 of 3
FI.e- BLD -2006-6916. dal
Punted'. 11 15'2D06
File: Memo -Timeline Print Date: 07/27/114:35 PM
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 8 of 34
April 17, 2007
RANDALL KENNEY
5185 VENADO AVE
ATASCADERO, CA 93422 3229
-8
vR
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Attachment 3
City of Atascadero
Fire Department
RE: Notice of Violation: Construction without a Permit
Address: 5185 VENADO
I am following up on a code violation complaint at the above listed property. After
reviewing files from the City Building Department, it appears there is still a violation on
your property. The following violations exist:
Construction without a Permit — California Building Code Section 106.2 (1)
Contact the City Building Department immediately.
You are required to comply with this order and correct the violation(s) within 10 days. If you
have not corrected the violation(s) or submit a correction plan approved by this office within the
above -stated time, you will receive a fine and or the violation will be prosecuted as a
misdemeanor, pursuant to the Atascadero Municipal Code.
Sincerely,
Thomas Peterson
Fire Marshal/Code Officer
File: Memo -Timeline Print Date: 07/27/114:35 PM
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 9 of 34
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Attachment 4
i
CITE' OF ATASCADERO
7 iaxs r
September 24, 2008
Randall Kerney
5185 Venado Ave.
Atascadero, CA 93422
RE: ACCESSORY STRUCTURE BUILT WITHOUT PERMITS
5185 VENADO AVE., APN 030-251-005
Dear Mr. Kenney:
This letter is to remind you of our ongoing concern over the 4,575 sq. ft. accessory stricture you
constructed on your property without required City permits and approvals.
On October 27, 2006, a STOP WORK notice was placed on this building as a result of a citizen
complaint. On November 9, 2006, you applied for the required permit. You picked up plan check
corrections on November 15, 2006, and we have not heard from you since. Our efforts to inform
you of this delay in adequate progress have so far been ignored. Our office still receives
complaints about this unpermitted structure, and it appears that you are currently occupying this
structure without required approvals.
Please be advised that construction and use of a building without required permits and approvals
is a violation of Section 8-2.102 of the Atascadero Municipal Code. The Atascadero Municipal
Code further requires that corrected plans be returned to the City within six months of notification
of plan check corrections in order to keep a proposed project active.
You are hereby notified that if you do not return your corrected plans to the City for further
processing by October 10, 2008, enforcement action will be taken, including but not limited to a
lien in the form of a NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE recorded on your property and/or a
citation issued with a monetary fine. In the event enforcement action is necessary, you will be
liable for all costs associated with the enforcement action, whether the action is administrative,
injunctive, or legal, and for all damages suffered by the City of Atascadero, as a result of such
efforts to abate the violation.
6907 EL CAMINO REAL ATASCADERO, CA 93422 1 (805) 461-50,00; FAX (805) 461-7612
File: Memo -Ti 'M
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 10 of 34
* i 9% '
ww_
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Randall Kenney
5185 Venado Ave.
September 24, 2008
Page 2 of 2
Please feel free to contact me at 470-3438 if I can be of assistance, or if you have questions
regarding this ]e
1
Siinccerely
I�
Ken Forman
Building Official
cc: Tom Peterson, Fire Marshal
Dave Muehlhausen, Senior Building Inspector
Violation case file
\\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- Building Services\05. Inspection and Enforcemem,5.05 ENF Cases\5185 Venado\5185 venado pre -notification 9-23-
08.kf.doc
File: Memo -Timeline Print Date: 071271114:35 PM
11-
IpTasce°sRo
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 11 of 34
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
Juilding Official, City of Atascadero
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
City of Atascadero
Community Development Dept.
6907 El Camino Real
Atascadero, CA 93422
No fee per Government Code Section 6103
NOTICE OF NON - COMPLIANCE
OWNER'S NAME: Randall Kenney
ADDRESS: 5185 Venado Ave. CITY: Atascadero STATE: CA ZIP 93422
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: CY ATAS ATAS BL KB LT 15 APN: 030-251-005
DESCRIPTION OF NOTICE.
eursuant to Section 8-2.110 of the Atascadero Municipal Code, A Notice of Non -Compliance has been issued
by the Building Official of the City of Atascadero on the above reference property.
The Building Official of the City of Atascadero has determined that the following violation(s) of the City Code
exist at the above referenced property.
1 Section 8-2,102 (b) of the Atascadero Municipal Code: Required Construction of detached accessory
structure without required permits and approvals.
I certify under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing document is true and correct and that the owners of the
property have been notified of the violations.
Executed on this2!:
of October 120 08 , at Atascadero County of San Luis Obispo,
State of California.
Signed
Kenneth M. Forman, Building Official, City of Atascadero
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
_,tate of California
County of San Luis Obispo
On Oct. 24, 2008
Date
personally appeared
File: Memo .............
beforeme, Annette L. Manier, Notary Public
(Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer
Kenneth M. Forman
(Name(s) of Signer(s)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 12 of 34
March 12, 2009
Randall Kenney
5185 Venado Ave.
Atascadero, CA 93422
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Attachment 6
CITY OF ATASCADERO
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
RE: UNPERMITTED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AT 5185 VENADO AVE.
APN 030-251-005
Dear Mr. Kenney:
This letter is to remind you of our ongoing concern of the unpermitted 4,575 sq. ft. accessory
structure on your property. As you know, this violation complaint began in October of 2006. On
November 9, 2006, you applied for a building permit, and at one time you met with a planner to
discuss the required Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application. Since that time, there has been
no recorded effort on your part to move the process forward. As a result of this lack of progress,
on October 24, 2008 the City recorded a Notice of Non -Compliance on your property. A recent
additional complaint filed with the City indicates you are now operating a commercial business
out of the unpermitted structure.
As you have been informed, there are two options for abating this violation; one is to obtain a
permit for the structure and complete it per the requirements of the Atascadero Municipal Code;
the other is to obtain a demolition permit, remove all unpermitted work, and restore the site to an
approved condition. In order to avoid additional code enforcement action, you must submit an
application for the required CUP, or obtain a permit to demolish the structure by March 27,
2009. Regardless of the proposed action you chose to take, you must vacate the structure and
eliminate any use or occupancy until all permits, inspections and approvals are secured.
File: Memo -Timeline Print Date: 071271114:35 PM
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 13 of 34
Please be advised that if you do not submit an application to legalize the structure by March 27,
2009, and cease use of the structure until all permits, inspections and approvals are secured, the
City will post the structure Unsafe and Unlawful, order the structure vacated until all approvals
are in place, and forwarded this case to the City Attorney for prosecution. In the event additional
code enforcement action is taken, you will be liable for all costs, including administrative costs,
staff time and City Attorney time, in abating this Municipal Code violation.
The City is hopeful that this case will be resolved in a cooperative manner, without unnecessary
costs and time delays.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, the City's code enforcement program, or the
requirements to correct your violation, please feel free to contact me directly at 470-3438, or at
kforman@atascadero.org. Thank you for your attention and cooperation in this important matter.
Sincerely,
Ken Forman
Building Official
cc: W. Frace, Community Development Director
B. Pierik, City Attorney
D. Muehlhausen, Senior Building Inspector
T. Peterson. Fire Marshal
\\Cityhall\cdvlpmnt\- Building Services\05. Inspection and Enforcement\5.05 ENF Cases\5185 Venado\5185 venado 3 12 09.docx
File: Memo -Timeline Print Date: 071271114:35 PM
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 14 of 34
Attachment 7
Recording requested by:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A FULL,
TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
Quality Loan Service Corp
RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
When recorded mail to:
RECORDED ON: February 17, 2009
Quality Loan Service Corp (fit
AS DOCUMENT NO: 09.7202 BK: / PG:
v�
2141 5th Avenue
BY: s/ Title Court Automation
San Diego, CA 92101
LSI TITLE COMPANY (CA)
i:;Nu" CL, 1}?,A4 f''LL,
Space above this line lar R—dees use
TS No.. CA -09.24548840--
Loan -No.: 1005846223
IMPORTANT NOTICE
NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND ELECTION TO SELL
UNDER DEED OF TRUST
IF YOUR PROPERTY IS IN FORECLOSURE BECAUSE YOU ARE BEHIND IN
YOUR PAYMENTS, IT MAY BE SOLD WITHOUT ANY COURT ACTION. You
may have the legal right to bring your account in good standing by paying all of your past due payments
plus permitted costs and expenses within the time permitted by law for reinstatement of your account
(normally five business days prior to the date set for the sale of your property). No sale may be set until
three months from the date this notice of default is recorded (which date of recordation appears on this
notice), This amount is $16,655.91 as of 2/12/2009 and will Increase until your account becomes current.
While your property is in foreclosure, you still must pay other obligations (such as insurance and
taxes) required by your note and deed of trust or mortgage. if you fail to make future payments on the
loan, pay taxes on the property, provide insurance on the property, or pay other obligations as required in
the note and deed of trust or mortgage, the beneficiary or mortgagee may insist that you do so in order to
reinstate your account in good standing. In addition, the beneficiary or mortgagee may require as a
condition of reinstatement that you provide reliable written evidence that you paid all senior liens, property
taxes, and hazard Insurance premiums.
Upon your written request, the beneficiary or mortgagee will give you a written Itemization of the
entire amount you must pay. You may not have the pay the entire unpaid portion of your account, even
though full payment was demanded, but you must pay all amounts in default at the time payment is made.
However, you and your beneficiary or mortgagee may mutually agree in writing prior to the time the notice
of sale is posted (which may not be earfier than the three-month period stated above) to, among other
things, (1) provide additional time in which to cure the default by transfer of the property or otherwise; or
(2) establish a schedule of payments in order to cure your default; or both (1) and (2).
Following the expiration of the time period referred to in the first paragraph of this notice, unless the
obligation being foreclosed upon or a separate written agreement between you and your creditor permits a
longer period, you have only the legal right to stop the sale of your property by paying the entire amount
demanded by your creditor.
To find out the amount you must pay, or arrange for payment to stop the foreclosure, or 0 your
property is in foreclosure for any other reason, contact:
Indymac Bank FSB
C/O Quality Loan Service Corp.
2141 5th Avenue
San Diego, CA 92101
619.645-7711
File: Memo -Timeline
j= L1) LUL 4
ti AZA,
I
1�
Print Date: 07/27/114:35 PM
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 15 of 34
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Attachment 8
„+Q p
❑ APPLICANTS COPY ■ FILE COPY
City of Atascadero
Planning Entitlement Review Process
Community Development Department / Public Works
The issues identified in the following section need to be resolved prior to processing your application.
Please respond in writing and plan revisions.
Items of Incompleteness: PLN -2009-1323
Planning Division Corrections Contact Callie Taylor 470-3448
With next submittal, include 4 full size copies of all required pages of the plan set. Include one 8 Y2 by
11 copy of all pages. The metal building plan set by American Buildings Company is not required. A
detailed floor plan, elevations, sections, and site plan/survey are required for a CUP. Contact staff to
review corrections and requirements for resubmittal. A complete plan set will be required at time of
submittal with next plan check.
1. Include a site plan, drawn to scale, showing all structures on the property. Identify property lines, setbacks,
driveway, fire truck turnaround, septic system, & all trees within 50' of the proposed structure/improvements.
The site plan which was submitted does not show the actual location of the unpermitted structure in relation to
the property lines and is not scaled to the underling site plan. Include a scale on the site plan.
2. City records show that the unpermitted structure is too close to the side property line (see attached aerial
photo). A 10' rear setback and a 5' side setback from the structure to the property lines is required. A survey
of the property line may be required to ensure that minimum setbacks are being met.
3. Identify the distance between the proposed structure and the existing residence, porch, & other structures.
Planning requires a 6 foot minimum setback between structures. Building & Fire may require additional
setbacks for fire protection. According to the site survey by McMillian Land Survey's, minimum setbacks are
not being met. The unpermitted structure may need to be modified to be permitted.
4. Please submit detailed architectural elevations drawn to scale to accurately represent the proposed structure.
Show all doors, utility doors, windows, light fixtures, awnings, materials changes, architectural details, etc.
Show the roof slope, height changes across the fagade, and any other details to accurately represent the
proposed building. Include a scale on the drawing. Label each elevation. Identify roof material, slope, &
overhang on elevations.
5. On the floor plan, identify all interior partitions/walls, columns, doors, utility doors, rooms, bathrooms, etc.
Show exterior wall depth. Include detail of the connection between siding and the metal structures. Identify
any electricity, plumbing, sinks, heating, or air conditioning in the structure. Building shall comply with City
polices regarding second units & accessory structures.
6. Submit a section drawing of the structure & the site. The section drawing should show the elevation changes
on the hillside in relation to the structure.
7. Submit an arborist report and tree protection plan signed by a certified arborist.
8. In order to approve a Conditional Use Permit for an oversized structure, the Planning Commission has to make
a finding that the structure is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Staff recommends including
landscape, awnings, trellises, porches, architectural details, etc. to enhance the building and create a structure
that is compatible with the residential surroundings.
Please note that even with added architectural details, the Planning Commission may not be able to make the
findings to permit an accessory structure at 4575 sq. ft. as this greatly exceeds the standard size allowances of
the Municipal Code.
9. Submit landscape plan. Include landscape which will help blend the building into the site / surroundings.
10. Submit a residential building record from the County to identify the size of the main residence.
11. The grading plan notes that soil has been pushed over the side of the hill. Any erosion will need to be repaired
/ maintained. Grading plan also identifies a change in grade from one side of the building to the other. Has
Page 2 of 3
File: Memo PM
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 16 of 34
❑ APPLICANTS COPY ■ FILE COPY
i^ City of Atascadero
s3.o 9� Planning Entitlement Review Process
Community Development Department 1 Public Works
grading been done to install the building? Explain. Submit grading plan if grading has occurred or needs to be
completed.
12. It appears that the unpermitted building is being used for a commercial business. The building plans identify
"Hollywood Hot Rods" as the client at 5185 Venado, and there are multiple listings online & in the phone book
which identify 5185 Venado as a commercial auto/ salvage business. Auto maintenance, repair, salvage etc,
for commercial purposes is not allowed as home occupation business, and can not be permitted on the subject
site as it is within the Residential Single -Family zone. Commercial businesses shall be not allowed on site
without the approval of a business license through the City of Atascadero and any businesses on site must be
in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed building shall not be permitted for commercial use.
13. Please call to schedule a site visit with staff (Building, Planning, & Fire department to meet on site).
Building Division Corrections Contact Ken Forman 470-3438
1. Provide a survey of the property (including property lines), if necessary, to verify information for Public Works
comment #1. Based on City aerial photos and plat maps, the proposed structure does not appear to meet
minimum setbacks to property lines or to other structures.
2. Your project will require a geotechnical investigation (soils report) for your project site. Recommendations
specific to the foundation design are to be included on the foundation plan. [CBC 1802 and AMC]
3. Your project requires a fire sprinkler system. The fire sprinkler plans must be submitted prior to issuance of a
building permit. [AMC]
Public Works Corrections Contact Joseph Chouinard, PE: 470-3490
1. Please provide a complete site plan, drawn to a standard scale, showing the accurate locations of all buildings,
setbacks, driveways, parking areas, trees, utilities, and existing grade contours. Include a vicinity map on the
plans.
2. It appears that there is more impervious surface with the addition of this building. Please provide preliminary
drainage calculations, prepared by a registered engineer, indicating the additional stormwater runoff with the
addition of this project. Provide preliminary grading and drainage plans identifying the area(s) for stormwater
detention.
3. Please note that the project will be conditioned as follows: In accordance with Municipal Code section 9-4.160,
the applicant shall slurry seal Venado Avenue across the frontage of the property to a width of % the street plus
10'. If existing buildings are located on the parcel, these improvements are only required if the constructed
value of the proposed buildings plus site improvements exceeds 25% of the value of existing buildings plus site
improvements. In order to qualify for this exemption, the applicant will need to provide copies of assessor's
information on the valuation of the existing building and site improvements as well as construction cost
estimates of the proposed buildings plus site improvements.
Fire Marshal Corrections Contact [Tom Peterson, Fire Marshall: 461-5070
1. Exterior walls not clearly shown on plans. If the structure has three side walls or is fully enclosed fire sprinklers
will be required.
2. Identify the following on site plan: driveway location, width, slope, and material, fire hydrant or standpipe
location, fire truck turn around, & tum outs along driveway (CT per Tom Peterson).
—end of corrections —
Page 3 of 3
File: Memo -Timeline Print Date: 071271114:35 PM
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 17 of 34
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Attachment 9
13 Please return this document with your resubmittal.
City of Atascadero
Community Development Department / Public Works
"MD
Plan Review/Permit Processing
SEISMIC ZONE PER CBC 1613 - CLIMATE ZONE 4 - WIND ZONES 70 M.P.N - EXPOSURE ZONE "B" OR "C"
ZONING ORDINANCE -TREE ORDINANCE-ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE -
2007 C.B.C. 12007 C.E.C. 12007 C.M.C./ 2007 C.P.0 / 2007 C.F.0
ENGINEERING STANDARDS / CALIFORNIA STATE ENERGY COMPLIANCE
Resubmittal Instructions:
1. Provide a response document for each correction list. This can be a separate document or a copy of the
correction sheet with written responses to each correction (Please be specific with sheet number, detail #, etc.).
Changes made should be highlighted by clouding in the added or omitted information.
2. Submit a list identifying any changes to the plan or previously submitted documents that are not the result of
correction responses. (i.e. added or reduced square -footage)
3. Resubmittals are only accepted before 4:30 P.M. on regular business days. All submittals must be made at the
front counter and must be checked in by department staff.
***If you have any questions regarding the following corrections or the permit process, please do not
hesitate to contact the Community Development Department at (805) 461-5000 or the plan checker(s) listed
on the correction sheets. ***
Plan Check Corrections: 2006-06916
Planning Division Corrections Contact: Alfredo R. Castillo, AICP: 470-3436
1 2"d Request: Please submit detailed architectural floor plans on sheet 2 (floor plan) clearly
identifying any interior walls, sinks, bathrooms, doors, utility doors, exterior wall depth, etc. Identify
any electricity, plumbing, sinks, heating, or air conditioning in the unpermitted structure.
2 2"d Request: Label tree on site plan to coincide with arborist report.
3. Arborist report indicates 50% impact to tree #10. Trees impacted over 40% require a mitigation
deposit. Arborist would need to be consulted to see of fill can be reduced or additional mitigation is
required to preserve the tree.
4. Modify Elevations to properly show the height of the existing residence and the unpermitted
structure. The height of the existing primary residence appears to be inaccurate in the front
elevation.
5. Based on the re -submittal, the unpermitted structure is partially encroaching on the neighboring
property (APN 030-251-032). Please submit a lot line adjustment to rectify this situation. This line lot
adjustment would need to include the minimum 5 -foot side yard setback. Please see enclosed Lot
Line Adjustment package for submittal requirements. Certificate of Compliance to record the Lot
Line Adjustment must be completed prior to permit issuance.
File: Memi Page 2 of 3 6/9/2011 3:07 PM
-8
v
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 18 of 34
O Please return this document with your resubmittal.
City of Atascadero
Community Development Department / Public Works
CAD
Plan Review/Permit Processing
6. Section 9-5.020(h) states that "additions shall have a continuous, logical internal connection without
doors of conditioned space that provides for access to all portions of the primary unit and addition."
Based on your proposed site plan and architectural plans, the addition, as shown, contains no
logical internal connections. Please revise the architectural floor plans to include a logical internal
connection to the addition in order to qualify for an "addition" to the residence rather than an
accessory structure. If this cannot be properly remedied, then please schedule a meeting with staff
(building, planning) to discuss next course of action (CUP may be required with additional
requirements).
7. It appears that the unpermitted building is being used for a commercial business. The building plans
identify "Hollywood Hot Rods" as the client at 5185 Venado, and there are multiple listings online &
in the phone book which identify 5185 Venado as a commercial auto/ salvage business. Auto
maintenance, repair, salvage etc, for commercial purposes is not allowed as home occupation
business, and can not be permitted on the subject site as it is within the Residential Single -Family
zone. Commercial businesses shall be not allowed on site without the approval of a business
license through the City of Atascadero and any businesses on site must be in conformance with the
Zoning Ordinance. The proposed building shall not be permitted for commercial use. Please
provide a written response to this comment.
8. Project will be conditioned to remove sea -train prior to issuance of final building permit.
9. If a CUP (Conditional Use Permit) is required, the building will be subject to appearance review, and
Planning Commission consideration. Colors, materials, landscaping information will be required.
Public Works Corrections Contact David Athey: 470-3424
10. The drainage analysis, Table 4, Detention System Analysis needs to be expanded to 480 min.
Adjust the design of the system according to the greatest OV. The time intervals the City will accept
are 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, 300, 360, 420 and 480
minutes.
11. Drainage on the northern portion of the lot is directed, in a concentrated flow, to the rear slope. This
water is likely to erode this slope. The concentrated flow needs to be sheet flow once it leaves the
swale. You can modify the drainage so it will not erode or treat it in another fashion.
12. Show or describe where the water that exits the basin will flow to. Water must leave the site in its
historic flow path.
Building Division Corrections Contact [Building]: 461-5000
1. See attached plan check comments.
2. Provide a response for each comment in the space provided.
3. Please return redlines with your resubmittal.
Page 3 of 3
618/2011 3:07 PM
File: Memo -Timeline Print Date: 07/27/114:35 PM
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 19 of 34
City of Atascadero
Community Development Department
RESIDENTIAL PLAN
6907 El Camino Real
CORRECTIONS &
Atascadero, CA 93422'
®,,
i�
COMMENTS
E
188
Checked By:
Ken Forman, Building Official r
California Code Check, Inc.
sA>rASCAD
Scott Martini, RE
Phone: (805) 461-5000
(805)541-4490
Date: March 24, 2010
BUILDING PERMIT #: B06-06916 SUBMITTAL: Original
PROJECT ADDRESS: 5185 Venado Ave.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Workshop/Garage
USE OF STRUCTURE: Workshop/Garage + Deck FLOOR AREA: 4656 ft' + 900 ft'
OCCUPANCY: U-1 or S-3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION`. V -N STORIES: ONE
FIRE SPRINKLERS: Not Specified
SOILS REPORT: Mid -Coast Geotechnical Inc. #10979 9-9-05;
INSTRUCTIONS:
A. This plan review has been made to verify conformance to minimum requirements of codes and ordinances
adopted by the City of Atascadero. Codes in effect for this project include the 2001 editions of the California
Building Code (CBC), California Plumbing Code (CPC), & the California Mechanical Code (CMC); the 2004
California Electrical Code, and the 2005 California Energy Code. The CBC is based upon the 1997 Uniform
Building Code; the CPC and CMC are based on the 2000 editions of the Uniform Plumbing Code, and Uniform
Mechanical Code respectively, published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical
Officials (IAPMO). The California Electrical Code is based on the 2002 edition of the National Electrical Code
published by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). Applicable code sections are referenced after
each item in this list.
B. Before approval for code compliance or issuance of a building permit, the plans and application for this
construction require the information, revisions and corrections indicated below. The approval of plans and
specifications does not permit the violation of any section of applicable codes, ordinance, or law.
C. In the "RESPONSE" space below each item, please indicate the sheet number and detail where revisions have
been made. Changes made should be highlighted by clouding in the added or omitted information. Resubmit
red marked original plan sets; the number of corrected sets of plans & calculations as required by the
IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE THIS PLAN REVIEW PROCESS PLEASE PROVIDE THE NAME AND
PHONE NUMBER OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO PREPARED THESE PLAN REVIEW RESPONSES.
NAME: PHONE:
1\Caadicelplan check\ATASTC-06\W; B06-6916 5185 Venado SFR Garage Workshop.doc
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 20 of 34
Plan Check #: B06-06916 City of Atascadero
Project Address: 5185 Venado Ave. 6907 El Camino Real
Description: Residential Garage/Workshop Atascadero, CA 93422
Date: March 24, 2010 Page 2 of 6
PLAN CHECK LIST FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS
Read the instructions on cover sheet before making corrections and resubmitting plans for approval. Indicate on the
"RESPONSE:" line below the correction items, the sheet, detail, and/or page in the calculations where the correction can be
found. If you do not respond to each correction item, we will assume that the correction has not been done and the plans will
be returned to you for further corrections.
GENERAL
1. All sheets of the revised plans are required to be stamped and signed by the California -licensed architect or engineer
responsible for the plan preparation. Please include the California license number, seal, current date of license expiration
and the date the plans are signed. [CA Business and Professions Code Sec. 5536.1, 6735]
RESPONSE:
2. The Architect or Engineer of Record for this project shall be responsible for reviewing and coordinating all submittal
documents prepared by others for compatibility with design of the building. This shall include wood truss package,
foundation plans, details and calculations, and the metal building plans, details, and calculations. The Architect or
Engineer of Record shall be designated on the title sheet of the plans (Eric Goblet as per Sheet 1 of the Civil plans?).
[CBC Sec. 106.3.4.1 ] Provide documentation to show that documents have been reviewed and approved as required.
RESPONSE:
3. Provide a note on the Title Sheet of the plans stating: "This project shall comply with the 2001 California Codes based
on the 1997 UBC, 2000 UMC, 2000 UPC; the 2004 California Electrical Code based upon the 2002 NEC; and the 2005
Residential Energy Standards." Coordinate Sheet 1 of the Civil Plans and Sheet 1 of the building plans accordingly.
[CBC Sec. 106.3]
RESPONSE:
4. Specify building occupancy and type of construction on the title sheet of the plans. Justify building occupancy on the
plans in accordance with CBC Sec. 311.1 or 312.2.2. [CBC Sec. 1063]
5. Correct the floor area on Sheet 1 of the building plans to be consistent with the dimensioned floor plans. [CBC Sec.
106.3]
6. Project Soils Engineer shall review and approve grading plans, foundation plans, and associated details and specifications
for consistency with the requirements of the soils report. [CBC Sec. 1803.2, 1804, 1806.2, 18151 Provide documentation
to show that plans have been reviewed and approved as required.
RESPONSE:
7. Work done without permits: [CBC Sec. 107.5.1, 108.1]
A. Concrete [Sec. 1701.5 Item I
B. Bolts installed in concrete (if required by calculations) [Sec. 1701.5 Item 21
C. Reinforcing Steel [Sec. 1701.5 Item 4]
D. Welding (Exception: Welding performed in a City -certified fabricator's shop) [Sec. 1701.5 Item 5]
E. High strength bolts. [Sec. 1701.5 Item 6]
F. Piling, drilled piers, and caissons [Sec. 1701.5 Item 11]
%Twdiublan 0k\ATASTC-06\SM\B06-6916 5185 VmWo SFR Garage Workshop.dm
File: Memo -Timeline Print Date: 071271114:35 PM
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 21 of 34
Plan Check #: B06-06916 City of Atascadero
Project Address: 5185 Venado Ave. 6907 El Camino Real
Description: Residential Garage/Workshop Atascadero, CA 93422
Date: March 24, 2010 Page 3 of 6
Note: The Special Inspector shall be a qualified person who shall demonstrate competence to the satisfaction of the
Building Official. Names a& qualifications of special inspector(s) shall be submitted to Building Department for approval.
RESPONSE:
SITE PLAN
9. Show and dimension all building roof and floor projections on the Site Plan consistently with the other submitted plans
(i.e. deck as shown on metal building plans). Building footprint is shown inconsistently on the Site Plan and Foundation
Plan at the southeast end of the building. Revise as necessary for consistency. [CBC Sec. 106.3]
RESPONSE:
10. Provide documentation from the project Soils Engineer to justify approval of cut slopes steeper than 2:1 as shown on the
Grading Plan. [CBC Appendix 3312.21
RESPONSE:
11. Show location of all trees 8" or more in diameter on the Site Plan. Show accurate drip lines of trees. Show tree
protection complying with the City of Atascadero Tree Ordinance and Tree Protection Guidelines. Show location of tree
protection fencing and trunk protection locations and details on Site Plan. [AMC]
12. Plans show off-site grading proposed. Provide written, notarized approval from the adjacent property owner authorizing
proposed work prior to permit issuance.
13. Show on the plans the proposed location of property line from lot line adjustment proposed on Sheet 2 of the Civil plans.
Show the setback dimensions from the property lines to the proposed building [CBC Sec. 106.3] Requirements based on
proximity to property line:
a. Maintain at least 30" between roof fascia and side property line where roof overhangs required windows. [CBC
Sec. 1204]
b. Projections beyond the exterior wall shall not extend beyond a point 1/3 the distance to the property line from an
assumed vertical plane located where fire -resistive protection of openings is first required due to location on
property, or more than 12 inches into the area where openings are prohibited. [CBC Sec. 503.2]
c. Combustible projections located where openings are not permitted or where protection of openings is required
shall be of one-hour or heavy timber construction. [CBC Sec. 705]
d. Exterior walls less than 3 feet from an adjacent property line shall be of one-hour construction. [CBC Table 5-A]
e. Provide a parapet wall 30 inches in height constructed of one-hour construction upon the wall referred to in item
"d" above. The uppermost 18" of the parapet adjacent to the roof surface shall be noncombustible. [CBC Sec.
709.4.2]
RESPONSE:
specified does not appear to be correct. [CBC Sec. 106.3]
RESPONSE:
16. Provide complete dimensions for the building addition on the Floor Plans. Unable to verify floor area of the addition
with plans as provided. [CBC Sec. 106.3]
RESPONSE:
%\Candice\plan check\ATASTC4*\SM 06-6916 5185 Ve-1. SFR Garage Workshop d -
File: Memo -Timeline Print Date: 07/27/114:35 PM
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 22 of 34
Plan Check #: B06-06916 City of Atascadero
Project Address: 5185 Venado Ave. 6907 El Camino Real
Description: Residential Garage/Workshop Atascadero, CA 93422
Date: March 24, 2010 Page 4 of 6
17. Dimension the separation between the garage and the residence buildings on the Floor Plan. [CBC Sec. 1633.2.11]
18. Specify building height on the title sheet of the plans and on the elevations. [CBC Sec. 106.3]
RESPONSE:
19. Residential Fre Sprinklers:
a. Per City Ordinance 458, Fire Sprinklers are required for this project. Please provide sprinkler layouts and
calculations which shall be approved prior to permit issuance (additional fee). [AMC, CFC]
b. Provide a letter from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company stating the minimum design pressure of the
sprinkler system. Incorporate this information onto the cover page of the plans. [BSP]
c. A single -check backflow prevention valve is required on sprinkler system. Provide Manufacturer and Model
Number of the device. [CPC, AMC]
d. Provide calculations for fire sprinkler system that shows a head loss across the backflow prevention device and
the water meter. [CFC]
RESPONSE:
20. The total area of a private garage used only as a parking garage for private or pleasure -type motor vehicles where no
repair work is done or fuel dispensed may be 3000 square feet, maximum. More than one 3000 -square -foot Group U-1
occupancy may be located in the same building, provided each 3000 -square -foot area is separated by area separation
walls complying with CBC Sec. 504.6. [CBC Sec. 312.2.2]
RESPONSE:
21. Area Separation Walls: [CBC Sec. 504.6] Provide accurate details on the plans for area separation walls as required.
a. Shall not be less than two-hour fire -resistive construction in Type V buildings. [Sec. 504.6.2]
b. The total width of all openings in such walls shall not exceed 25% the length of the wall in each story. All
openings shall be protected by a fire assembly having a 1-1/2 hour fire -protection rating in two hour fire -
resistive walls. [Sec. 504.6.2]
c. Shall extend horizontally to the outer edges of horizontal projecting elements such as balconies, roof overhangs,
canopies, marquees, or architectural projections extending beyond the floor area as defined in Sec. 207. [Sec.
504.6.3]
d. Shall extend vertically from the foundation to a point at least 30 inches above the roof. [CBC Sec. 504.6.4]
e. Parapets shall have noncombustible faces for the uppermost 18 inches, including counterflashing and coping
materials. [Sec. 504.6.5]
f. Include structural framing and connection details for proposed construction.
RESPONSE:
22. Specify one-hour fire -resistive construction between garage and residence to the roof sheathing. When such separation
supports an upper floor, the ceilings, posts and beams must be similarly protected (earase side only: 5/8 -inch Tvoe "X"
25. Provide guardrails as required at the garage deck. Guardrails are required at open -sided walking surfaces that are more
than 30" above the grade or floor below, and shall comply with the following: [CBC Sec. 509]
a. Shall be 36" minimum in height.
b. Openings shall be spaced so that a 4" diameter sphere shall not pass.
c. Details and calculations shall be provided for guard connections to resist the forces prescribed by CBC Table 16-13.
RESPONSE:
\\Candice\plan checkWASTC-M M /3064916 5185 Venda SFR Garage Workshop.doc
File: Memo -Timeline Print Date: 07/27/114:35 PM
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 23 of 34
Plan Check #: B06-06916 City of Atascadero
Project Address: 5185 Venado Ave. 6907 El Camino Real
Description: Residential Garage/Workshop Atascadero, CA 93422
Date: March 24, 2010 Page 5 of 6
26. Smoke Detector Requirements: [CBC Sec. 310.9.1.2, 310.9.1.3, 310.9.1.4]
a. Provide smoke detectors in each new and existing sleeping rooms and at a point centrally located in the hallway
or area giving access to each separate, new and existing, sleeping area.
b. A smoke detector shall be installed on each story and in the basement
c. When sleeping rooms are on an upper level, a smoke detector shall be placed at the ceiling of the upper level in
close proximity to stairway.
d. In dwelling units where the ceiling height of a room open to the hallway serving the bedrooms exceeds that of
the hallway by 24 inches or more, smoke detectors shall be installed in the hall way and in the adjacent room.
e. In new construction, the required smoke detectors shall receive their primary power from the building wiring
and shall be equipped with a battery backup. Smoke detectors may be solely battery operated when installed in
existing sleeping rooms and hallways
RESPONSE:
27. Specify roof pitch on the roof plan and show roof drainage. [CBC Sec. 1506]
RESPONSE:
28. Sheet E-11 of the metal building plans shows skylights proposed. Provide specifications on the plans for proposed
skylights to demonstrate compliance with CBC Sec. 2409 or 2603.7, and to show equivalent to minimum Class `A'
roofing as required by City ordinance.
RESPONSE:
29. Specify rake flashing on the plans, which is indicated as "Not by ABC" on the metal building plans. [CBC Sec. 106.3]
RESPONSE:
30. Provide an electrical plan to show locations of required electrical outlets and light fixtures proposed. [CEC Art. 210.8,
210.52, 210.70] It is possible additional comments may follow.
RESPONSE:
31. Specify on the plans whether the garage/workshop is conditioned or unconditioned. Complete energy compliance
documentation is required for new conditioned spaces to demonstrate compliance with the 2001 CEnC and the 2005
Residential Energy Standards. If the building is unconditioned, provide mandatory measures on the plans indicating
lighting requirements of CEnC Sec. 150(k). Provide required compliance forms, completed and signed, as a part of the
plans as required.
STRUCTURAL
32. Provide foundation and retaining wall calculations, prepared and stamped and signed by a California -licensed architect or
engineer, to justify the foundation system shown and detailed on the drawings. FCBC Sec. 1806.2. 1807. 1808. 18091
c. Installation procedures
d. Field inspection and reporting procedures (to include procedures for verification of installed bearing capacity
where applicable)
e. He load test requirements
aC=dia\piandm*\ATnswc06SSMM-69165ta5 vmadosrnc age workshop.a«
File: Memo -Timeline Print Date: 071271114:35 PM
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 24 of 34
Plan Check #: B06-06916
Project Address: 5185 Venado Ave.
Description: Residential Garage/Workshop
Date: March 24, 2010
35.
metal building plans. [CBC Sec. 106.3]
at portal frame at
City of Atascadero
6907 El Camino Real
Atascadero, CA 93422
Page 6 of 6
on the Foundation Plan, as shown on Sheet AB -1 of th1
36. Show and provide details for foundations at columns at line 4 on the Foundation Plan, as shown on Sheet AB -1 of the
metal building plans. [CBC Sec. 106.3]
37. Dimension maximum retained height in retaining wall detail 4/S-1 on the Foundation Plan. [CBC Sec. 1611.6]
RESPONSE:
38. Steel columns are shown installed in pockets in the exterior foundation wall on the Foundation Plan: [CBC Sec. 106.3,
1402, 1633.2.11]
a. Dimension the separation between the steel column and the surrounding foundation wall on the plans or details.
b. Show appropriate corrosion protection and prevention of water ponding at the column base is to be provided.
RESPONSE:
39. Deformation Compatibility: All structural framing elements and their connections, not required by design to be a part of
the lateral force -resisting system, shall be designed and/or detailed to be adequate to maintain support of design dead plus
live load when subjected to the expected deformations caused by seismic forces. [CBC Sec. 1633.2.41 Provide
justification and detailing on the plans.
40. All parts of the structure shall be tied and interconnected and connections shall be capable of transmitting the seismic
force induced by the parts being connected. [CBC Sec. 1633.2.5] Otherwise, buildings shall be separated in accordance
with CBC Sec. 1633.2.11. Provide justification and detailing and on the plans.
RESPONSE:
41. Provide plans, details, and calculations for "deck" construction as shown in the details on Sheet E-09 of the metal
building plans. The building plans show roll -up doors to access the deck; verify designed for vehicle loads as required.
[CBC Sec. 2205.7]
RESPONSE:
42. Specify all framing members on the metal building plans, including columns, beams, purlins, struts, girts, etc. [CBC Sec.
106.31 (i.e. MF -1, FNIX, FP -2X, etc.)
RESPONSE:
43. Cross-reference the metal building structural details to locations where occurs on the metal building plans, sections, and
RESPONSE:
Administrative Information and Instructions:
Please return the originally submitted set of plans along with 2 new revised sets. If the original marked -up set is not returned
and/or a response is not provided for EACH correction item, a recheck will NOT be done and the plans will be returned.
kkCanW,6fl. ch.WATASUIC-06MAB06.6916 5185 W do SFR Garage Wo,bhop.da
File: Memo -Timeline Print Date: 07/27/114:35 PM
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 25 of 34
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Attachment 10
❑ Please return this document with your resubmittal.
4
Ci of Atascadero
f �. ! Community Development Department / Public Works
C-rere'y �i .vso4!
Plan Review/Permit Processing
SEISMIC ZONE PER CBC 1613 - CLIMATE ZONE 4 -WIND ZONES 70 M.P.H - EXPOSURE ZONE "B" OR "C"
ZONING ORDINANCE -TREE ORDINANCE-ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE.
2007 C.B.C. / 2007 C.E.C. 12007 C.M.C./ 2007 C.P.0 / 2007 C.F.0
ENGINEERING STANDARDS / CALIFORNIA STATE ENERGY COMPLIANCE
Resubmittal Instructions:
1. Provide a response document for each correction list. This can be a separate document or a copy of the
correction sheet with written responses to each correction (Please be specific with sheet number, detail #, etc.).
Changes made should be highlighted by clouding in the added or omitted information.
2. Submit a list identifying any changes to the plan or previously submitted documents that are not the result of
correction responses. (i.e. added or reduced square -footage)
3. Resubmittals are only accepted before 4:30 P.M. on regular business days. All submittals must be made at the
front counter and must be checked in by department staff.
***If you have any questions regarding the following corrections or the permit process, please do not
hesitate to contact the Community Development Department at (805) 461-5000 or the plan checker(s) listed
on the correction sheets. ***
Plan Check Corrections: 2006-06916
Planning Division Corrections Contact Alfredo R. Castillo, AICP: 461-5000
1. 2nd request. Based on the re -submittal, the unpermitted structure is partially encroaching on the
neighboring property (APN 030-251-032). Please submit a lot line adjustment to rectify this situation.
This line lot adjustment would need to include the minimum 5 -foot side yard setback. Certificate of
Compliance to record the Lot Line Adjustment must be completed prior to issuance of a building
permit.
2. 3'd request. Please submit detailed architectural floor plans on sheet 2 (floor plan) clearly identifying
any interior walls, sinks, bathrooms, doors, utility doors, exterior wall depth, etc. Identify any
electricity, plumbing, sinks, heating, or air conditioning in the unpermitted structure. If there are no
additional details, please note on corrections response.
3. Arborist report indicates 50% impact to tree #10. Trees impacted over 40% require a mitigation
deposit. A bond will be required for this tree to ensure protection prior to issuance of a building
permit.
4. Project will be conditioned to remove sea -train prior to issuance of final building permit. No action
required.
Page 2 of 3 6/8/2011 3:08 PM
File: Memo -Timeline Print Date: 07/27/114:35 PM
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 26 of 34
= 0 Please return this document with your resubmittal.
A.i City of Atascadero
Community Development Department / Public Works
Plan Review/Permit Processing
Public Works Corrections Contact David M. Athey, PE: 461-5000
5. See redline corrections. Add notes on Sheet One. Resubmit redlines with next submittal.
6. Applicant shall slurry seal Vanado Avenue prior to final unless valuation numbers are provided to Public Works
7. All areas that are treated with mulch and are on slopes greater than 10% must be track walked to crimp in the
mulch. Otherwise, a mat or net must be used. All mat with plastic netting used for binding must be animal
friendly so as not to trap snakes and other animals in the mesh.
8. Public Works will not approve plans until the lot line adjustment is recorded at the County.
Building Division Corrections Contact [Building]: 461-5000
1. See attached plan check comments. Provide a response for each comment in the space provided. Please
return redlines with your resubmittal.
Page 3 of 3
8/8/2011 3:08 PM
File: Memo -Timeline Print Date: 07/27/114:35 PM
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 27 of 34
City of Atascadero
Community Development Department
RESIDENTIAL PLAN
6907 El Camino Real
CORRECTIONS &
Atascadero, CA 93422
p, ®, NMI
11
COMMENTS
n
.0-..
Checked By:
Ken Forman, Building Official tela �1
x9'91 California Code Check, Inc.
CAD
i Scott Martini, RE
Phone: (805) 461-5000
(805)541-4490
Date: November 2, 2010
BUILDING PERMIT #: B06-06916 SUBMITTAL: Second
PROJECT ADDRESS: 5185 Venado Ave.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Workshop/Garage
USE OF STRUCTURE: Workshop/Garage 4. Doe FLOOR AREA: 46-56 4575 ft2 99t} ftp
OCCUPANCY: S-3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V -N STORIES: ONE
FIRE SPRINKLERS: Not Specified
SOILS REPORT: Mid -Coast Geotechnical Inc. 410979 9-9-05;
INSTRUCTIONS:
A. This plan review has been made to verify conformance to minimum requirements of codes and ordinances
adopted by the City of Atascadero. Codes in effect for this project include the 2001 editions of the California
Building Code (CBC), California Plumbing Code (CPC), & the California Mechanical Code (CMC); the 2004
California Electrical Code, and the 2005 California Energy Code. The CBC is based upon the 1997 Uniform
Building Code; the CPC and CMC are based on the 2000 editions of the Uniform Plumbing Code, and Uniform
Mechanical Code respectively, published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical
Officials (IAPMO). The California Electrical Code is based on the 2002 edition of the National Electrical Code
published by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). Applicable code sections are referenced after
each item in this list.
B. Before approval for code compliance or issuance of a building permit, the plans and application for this
construction require the information, revisions and corrections indicated below. The approval of plans and
specifications does not permit the violation of any section of applicable codes, ordinance, or law.
C. In the "RESPONSE" space below each item, please indicate the sheet number and detail where revisions have
been made. Changes made should be highlighted by clouding in the added or omitted information. Resubmit
red marked original plan sets; the number of corrected sets of plans & calculations as required by the
jurisdiction; and this correction sheet. A separate sheet for responses may be used.
D. Plan check fee provides for the initial plan check and one recheck. There may be an additional plan check fee
for any additional plan checks.
E. Submit a list showing any changes to the plan or previously submitted documents that are not the result of this
plan review.
F. Application for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by
limitation. An extension of 180 days may be granted upon written request. (107.4 UBC}
G. SPECIAL NOTE: Please first review the red marked set of drawings as they may serve as a guide to
clarify comments/corrections as specified within this list.
IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE THIS PLAN REVIEW PROCESS PLEASE PROVIDE THE NAME AND
PHONE NUMBER OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO PREPARED THESE PLAN REVIEW RESPONSES.
NAME: PHONE:
%%Candim\plan chmk%ATAS1PC-061SMIB06-6916-115185 Venado SFR G=Se Workahop.doc
File: Memo -Timeline Pnnt Date: 07/27/114:35 PM
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 28 of 34
Plan Check #: B06 -06916 -II City of Atascadero
Project Address: 5185 Venado Ave. 6907 El Camino Real
Description: Residential Garage/Workshop Atascadero, CA 93422
Date: November 2, 2010 Page 2 of 5
1. OK
2. The Architect or Engineer of Record for this project shall be responsible for reviewing and coordinating all submittal
documents prepared by others for compatibility with design of the building. This shall include wood truss package,
foundation plans, details and calculations, and the metal building plans, details, and calculations. The Architect or
Engineer of Record shall be designated on the title sheet of the plans (Eric Gobler as per Sheet 1 of the Civil plans?).
[CBC Sec. 106.3.4.1] Provide documentation to show that documents have been reviewed and approved as required.
RESPONSE: Eric Gobler is civil engineer for grading, drainage, and erosion control only. Calvin will coordinate
all documents
Provide documentation to show the foundation plans and calculations, metal building plans and calculations, and an
submittal documents have been reviewed and approved by the project Engineer of Record.
3. Provide a note on the Title Sheet of the plans stating: "This project shall comply with the 2001 California Codes based
on the 1997 UBC, 2000 UMC, 2000 UPC; the 2004 California Electrical Code based upon the 2002 NEC; and the 2005
Residential Energy Standards." Coordinate Sheet 1 of the Civil Plans and Sheet 1 of the building plans accordingly.
[CBC Sec. 106.3]
RESPONSE: Note modified Civil sheet 1
Scope of General Notes" note #1 on Sheet Al needs to be revised consistently.
RESPONSE:
4. Specify building occupancy and type of construction on the title sheet of the plans. Justify building occupancy on the
plans in accordance with CBC Sec. 311.1 or 312.2.2. [CBC Sec. 106.3]
RESPONSE: See letter on Al. Type VB Group S-2
Please clearly speck the building occupancy and type of construction on lite title sheet of the plans in order for plan
review to be completed.
RESPONSE:
5. Correct the floor area on Sheet 1 of the building plans to be consistent with the dimensioned floor plans. [CBC Sec. 106.3]
RESPONSE: See sheet Al
Item remains; dimensioned plans show 4575 s f. garage/shop building, Sheet AI specifies 4474 s f.
RESPONSE:
6. Project Soils Engineer shall review and approve grading plans, foundation plans, and associated details and specifications
for consistency with the requirements of the soils report. [CBC Sec. 1803.2, 1804, 1806.2, 1815] Provide documentation
to show that plans have been reviewed and approved as required.
RESPONSE: See does from Mid -Coast Geo
Letter from sails engineer dated 8-11-10. If subsequent changes are made to the plans or the soils report at future
submittal, the revised/final plans shall be reviewed & approved by the soils engineer reflecting those dates. No further
comment at this time'.
7. Work done without permits: [CBC Sec. 107.5.1, 108.1]
a. Prior to plan approval provide a report from a building materials laboratory verifying the following: 1) Slab
thickness and reinforcement, vapor barrier. 2) Foundation width and depth, reinforcement and anchor bolts.
b. As a condition for issuing a building permit, the following is required and is to be noted on the plans: "The
Building Inspector is to verify by inspection the following: 1) Expose an exterior wall to verify typical framing,
connections, nailing, insulation, electrical, and any other conditions as deemed necessary by the inspector. 2) All
changes/deficiencies as a result of plan review shall be corrected, completed and inspected."
RESPONSE: To be reviewed/approved personally with building dept.
Letter from Mid -Coast Geotechnical dated 3-5-10 found to address item (a). Additional documentation may be
required if subsequent changes are made to the plans at future submittal Please provide the note requested in item
(b) on the plans.
RESPONSE:
S. The owner or the project engineer/architect, acting as the owner's agent, shall employ special inspector(s) to provide
inspection(s) of the following types of work during construction. [CBC Sec. 1701 ] Please provide a readily -identifiable
note on the cover sheet clearly listing special inspections required for the t►roiect:
A. Concrete [Sec. 1701.5 Item 1]
B. Bolts installed in concrete (if required by calculations) [Sec. 1701.5 Item 2]
kTWWicalpkn check4AiAS1PC-061SM�B"6 6916-115185 Vmado SFR Garage Workshop.doc
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 29 of 34
Plan Check #: B06 -06916 -II City of Atascadero
Project Address: 5185 Venado Ave. 6907 El Camino Real
Description: Residential Garage/Workshop Atascadero, CA 93422
Date: November 2, 2010 Page 3 of 5
C. Reinforcing Steel [Sec. 1701.5 Item 4]
D. Welding (Exception: Welding performed in a City -certified fabricator's shop) [Sec. 1701.5 Item 5]
E. High strength bolts. [Sec. 1701.5 Item 6]
F. Piling, drilled piers, and caissons [Sec. 1701.5 Item 11 ]
Note: The Special Inspector shall be a qualified person who shall demonstrate competence to the satisfaction of the
Building Official. Names & qualifications of special inspector(s) shall be submitted to Building Department for approval.
RESPONSE: Reports provided by Mid -Coast. Mid -Coast is approved
Item remains
RESPONSE:
9. Show and dimension all building roof and floor projections on the Site Plan consistently with the other submitted plans
(i.e. deck as shown on metal building plans). Building footprint is shown inconsistently on the Site Plan and Foundation
Plan at the southeast end of the building. Revise as necessary for consistency. [CBC Sec. 106.3]
RESPONSE: See plans. Deck is not to be constructed
Building footprint still needs to be shown consistently on the site plan and the floodfoundation plans.
RESPONSE:
10. OK 11. OK
12. Plans show off-site grading proposed. Provide written, notarized approval from the adjacent property owner authorizing
proposed work prior to permit issuance.
RESPONSE: Owners are to apply for lot line adjustment
Item remains.
13. Show on the plans the proposed location of property line from lot line adjustment proposed on Sheet 2 of the Civil plans.
Show the setback dimensions from the property lines to the proposed building [CBC Sec. 106.3] Requirements based on
proximity to property line: Plans show minimum 10 foot setback from the proposed property lines to the building,
exterior wall and opening protection is not required for Group S-2 occupancy proposed Item is acceptable subject to
the finalization of lire lot line adjustment and subsequent changes being reviewed and approved No further comment
at this time.
14. thru 19. OK
20. The total area of a private garage used only as a parking garage for private or pleasure -type motor vehicles where no
repair work is done or fuel dispensed may be 3000 square feet, maximum. More than one 3000 -square -foot Group U-1
occupancy may be located in the same building, provided each 3000 -square -foot area is separated by area separation
walls complying with CBC Sec. 504.6. [CBC Sec. 312.2.2]
RESPONSE: See description on sheet A-1. Group S-2 Type VB
Plans have changed to show Group S-2 occupancy proposed However it appears the appropriate occupancy per Sec.
311.1 would be Group S-3 as the use is specified as "Garare" on the floor plan, and conflicts with the Planninr
Division corrections which specify this is a commercial project identired as "Hollywood Hot Rods". Please revise
plans to specify occupancy and use consistently. As a commercial occupancy the building is required to comply with
the following. (Please note that if the building is changed back to Group U-1 occupancy at future submittal, the
requirements for U-1 will need to be re -checked and additional comments may apply)
a. Provide justifrcatlon on the plans to clarify if the proposed garage is to be used for repair or storage of motor
vehicles that does not involve open flame or welding. This would require a Group H-4 occupancy
classification. [CBCSec. 311.1, 307.1.11
b. Update die permit application to reflect revised occupancy change as necessary. (CBC Sec. 10631
RESPONSE:
c. The building shall be accessible and comply with the requirements of CBC Chapter 11 B. Show requirements
on the plans for site accessibility, complying entrances and exits, sanitaryfacilities, etc. [CBC Sec. 101.17.111
RESPONSE:
d Doors, thresholds, and landings shall comply with the requirements of CBC Sec. 1003.3.1 and 1133B.2
e. Provide minimum plumbing fixtures as per CPC Table 4-1 or CBC Chapter 29
RESPONSE:
\1Cwdicelpla check\ATASTC-06\SM0G6-6916415195 Ve do SFR Garage W orkahop.doc
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 30 of 34
Plan Check #: B06 -06916 -II City of Atascadero
Project Address: 5185 Venado Ave. 6907 El Camino Real
Description: Residential Garage/Workshop Atascadero, CA 93422
Date: November 2, 2010 Page 4 of 5
f. Provide complete electrical, mechanical, and plumbing plans prepared and signed by a licensed architect,
engineer, or the contractor which will be responsible for lite work. [CA Business and Professions Code Sec.
5536.11 67351
The one-hour occupancy separation between the Group S-2 and the residence must be continuous to file roof
sheathing; see Detail 41A5. [CBC Sec. 302.2, Table 3-B1
RESPONSE:
Floors shall drain to an approved oil separator or trap discharging to sewers in accordance with the CTC.
[CBC Sec. 31 L2.3.11
RESPONSE:
Provide required ventilation per CEnC Sec. 12L
21. thru 23. OK
24. Sizes and locations of exterior wall openings for roll -up doors and windows are shown/specified inconsistently on Sheet 2
of the building plans and on Sheets E-14 and E-15 of the metal building plans. Revise for consistency. [CBC Sec. 106.3]
RESPONSE: See plan
Height of the roll -up doors at the front of the building are specified as 18' on the Floor Plan; metal building plans
Sheet E-15 shows 16'. Please revisefor consistency.
RESPONSE:
25. thru 27. OK
28. Sheet E-11 of the metal building plans shows skylights proposed. Provide specifications on the plans for proposed
skylights to demonstrate compliance with CBC Sec. 2409 or 2603.7, and to show equivalent to minimum Class 'A'
roofing as required by City ordinance. No response provided; item remains.
RESPONSE:
29. OK
30. Provide an electrical plan to show locations of required electrical outlets and light fixtures proposed. [CEC Art. 210.8,
210.52, 210.70] It is possible additional comments may follow.
RESPONSE: See sheet A-2
Lighting does not appear adequate to provide minimum I footcandle to all portions of the building (means of egress)
as required by CBC Sec. 1003.2.9.1, nor provide required light as per Sec. 1202.1.
RESPONSE:
31. Specify on the plans whether the garage/workshop is conditioned or unconditioned. Complete energy compliance
documentation is required for new conditioned spaces to demonstrate compliance with the 2001 CEnC and the 2005
Residential Nonresidential Energy Standards. If the building is unconditioned, provide mandatory measures on the plans
indicating lighting requirements of CEnC Sec. 150(k). Provide required compliance forms, completed and signed, as a
part of the plans as required.
RESPONSE: No mandatory measures are req'd for unconditioned res. garage
Item remains. Garage was revised and proposed as nonresidential Group S-3 occupancy at 2"d SubmittaL
STRUCTURAL
32. Provide foundation and retaining wall calculations, prepared and stamped and signed by a California -licensed architect or
engineer, to justify the foundation system shown and detailed on the drawings. [CBC Sec. 1806.2, 1807, 1808, 1809]
Retaining wall foundations supporting the garage slab shall be designed for vehicular surcharge loading. [CBC Sec.
1611.6]. Structural plan check remains to be completed; it is possible additional comments may follow.
RESPONSE: (E) Wes have been lost. By inspection, the foundation design exceeds reactions shown by ABC. I
did l page cale for retaining wall — OK
Complete foundation calculations are required for this project; item remains. /CBC Sec. 1806.4
RESPONSE:
33. Provide calculations for the metal building, to justify the submitted plans. [CBC Sec. 2205] Structural plan check
remains to be completed for this item; it is possible additional comments may follow.
RESPONSE: See ABC package
Calculations were not provided or reviewed; item remains.
RESPONSE:
NCandice�plan checklATAS1PC-06'SMlD"16-n 5185 Venado SFR Curage Workshop dm
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 31 of 34
Plan Check #: B06 -06916 -II City of Atascadero
Project Address: 5185 Venado Ave. 6907 El Camino Real
Description: Residential Garage/Workshop Atascadero, CA 93422
Date: November 2, 2010 Page 5 of 5
34. Pier and pile foundations shall be designed and installed on the basis of a foundation investigation as defined in CBC Sec.
1804. The investigation and report shall be expanded to provide recommendations for pier or pile foundations, including
the following, at a minimum: [CBC Sec. 1807.1, 1807.3]
a. Recommended pile types and installed capacities
b. Driving criteria
c. Installation procedures
d. Field inspection and reporting procedures (to include procedures for verification of installed bearing capacity
where applicable)
e. Pile load test requirements
RESPONSE: Documentation by Mid Coast Geo.
Design criteria & installation recommendations not found in the soil report or documentation provided. Item remains.
35. Show and provide details for foundations at portal frame at line E on the Foundation Plan, as shown on Sheet AB -1 of the
metal building plans. [CBC Sec. 106.3]
RESPONSE: Sheet A-3
Provide a detail for the foundation and anchorage at the portal frame columns; detail on Sheet A-3 only shows the
placement of the columns. Include calculations to justify for frame reactions per metal building design and placement
upon foundation system proposed.
RESPONSE:
36. Show and provide details for foundations at columns at line 4 on the Foundation Plan, as shown on Sheet AB -1 of the
metal building plans. [CBC Sec. 106.3]
RESPONSE: Sheet A-3
Provide a detail for the foundation and anchorage of these columns.
RESPONSE:
37. Dimension maximum retained height in retaining wall detail 4/S-1 on the Foundation Plan. [CBC Sec. 1611.6]
RESPONSE: 5 ft. max as -built condition (see my talc)
Provide dimensions on the plans as requested.
RESPONSE:
38. Steel columns are shown installed in pockets in the exterior foundation wall on the Foundation Plan: [CBC Sec. 106.3,
1402,1633.2.11]
a. Dimension the separation between the steel column and the surrounding foundation wall on the plans or details.
b. Show appropriate corrosion protection and prevention of water ponding at the column base is to be provided.
RESPONSE: Inside dimension of pocket is 24"x40". Clearance is 7"-8" on sides and 4" at rear. Column flange is
8" wide. Col's covered by canopy
Provide dimensions on the plans. Columns appear to be exposed to the weather; therefore item (b) remains applicable.
39. thru 41. OK
42. Specify all framing members on the metal building plans, including columns, beams, purlins, struts, girts, etc. [CBC Sec.
106.3] (i.e. MF -1, FP -IX, FP -2X, etc.)
RESPONSE: See manufacturers drawings
Item remains.
RESPONSE:
43. OK
44. Provide wood truss plans, details and calculations at re -submittal (not allowed as a deferred submittal per City policy).
c. All truss -to -truss connections shall be specified on the pians or the truss design drawings. Remains.
RESPONSE:
45. OK 46. OK
Administrative Information and Instructions:
Please return the originally submitted set of plans along with 2 new revised sets. If the original marked -up set is not returned
and/or a response is not provided for EACH correction item, a recheck will NOT be done and the plans will be returned.
RCaidice�plan checklATASTC-06\SMS06.6916-115185 Venado SFR G—ge workshop doc
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 32 of 34
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Attachment 11
File: Memo -Timeline
Print Date: 071271114:35 PM
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 33 of 34
1�
File: Memo -Timeline
Print Date: 07/27/114:35 PM
CITY OF ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
5185 Venado Code Enforcement
July 27, 2011
Page 34 of 34
File: Memo -Timeline Print Date: 07127/114:35 PM