HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 0410904Tn4w rrEM I
Approved as Read 4/24/90
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
APRIL 10, 1990
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Pro -Tem Lilley at 7:05
p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Shiers.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Councilmembers Mackey, Borgeson, Shiers and Mayor
ProTem Lilley
Absent: Mayor Dexter
Staff Present: Ray Windsor, City Manager; Arther Montandon, City
Attorney; Henry Engen, Community Development
Director; Andy Takata, Director of Parks,
Recreation & Zoo; Mark Joseph, Administrative
Services Director; Bud McHale, Police Chief;
Gregory Luke, Public Works Director and Lee Dayka,
City Clerk and Lisa Schicker, City Arborist
Mayor ProTem Lilley introduced and welcomed Gregory Luke, the new
Public Works Director. Mr. Luke gave a brief description of his
professional background for those present.
PROCLAMATIONS:
Mayor ProTem Lilley read the following proclamations:
- "Victims' Rights Week" - April 22-28 1990
- "Child Abuse Prevention Month" - The Month of April 1990
- "March of Dimes WalkAmerica Day" - April 21, 1990
- "Earth Week" - April 15, 22, 1990
Recycling Program Presentation by Jim Patterson:
Jim Patterson, Chairman of the Recycling Committee, gave an in-
depth status report on the committee's efforts and concerns. He
reported on the concept of curbside recycling, describing two
types: Material Separation Method and Co -Mingling. He stated
that the program would need to be tailored to the community and
added that the system would apply only to residential customers
CC4/10/90
Page 1
0 0
and offer limited reduction.
Mr. Patterson explained that the economic future of recycling
looks grim and that new markets must be created to complete the
circle. He stated further that the committee was in support of
Wil -Mar Disposal's request for a fee increase and that the
garbage company has been very cooperative with the concerns of
the Recycling Committee.
The committee's chairman spoke in support of mandatory garbage
collection, stating that currently Atascadero does not have an
accurate accounting of how much solid waste it is producing. He
added that in order to meet the strict requirements of new
legislature, the City must focus on source reduction, pursue
curbside recycling, continue with public education programs,
establish regional cooperation to share costs and benefits, and
urged the designation of a City employee whose sole duty would be
to implement these concepts.
Mr. Patterson introduced the members of the Recycling Committee
as Councilwoman Mackey, Craig Dingman, Michelle Velasco, Renee
Silberman, Ron Vilarino, David Crouch and Bill Gibbs.
Additionally he acknowledged Jim Rosa of Wil -Mar Disposal
Company.
Mayor ProTem Lilley thanked Mr. Patterson for his presentation
and asked the public to hold their comments regarding mandatory
garbage pick-up (C-2) until that item of the agenda was called
for.
COMMUNITY FORUM:
Mayor ProTem Lilley opened the meeting for public comments.
There were none.
Chief McHale recognized the work of the Retired Senior Volunteers
Program (RSVP) and reported that there are currently 16 members
from this group working with the Police Department. The Chief
announced that on April 7, 1990, at a County -wide meeting of the
Board of Directors of RSVP, the Atascadero Police Department RSVP
Station received the honor of "Station of the Year". He stated
that the unit is coordinated by Officer Ken Spann and supervised
by Lt. Bill Watton.
The Chief also announced that his department had also received
two awards recognizing Investigator Blair Sims for his efforts
in prevention of child abuse.
CC4/10/90
Page 2
•
•
Mayor ProTem Lilley thanked the Chief, his department and the
senior volunteers.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR:
Mayor ProTem Lilley read the Consent Calendar.
1. MARCH 27, 1990 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
2. MARCH 29, 1990 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES (Study Session)
3. CITY TREASURER'S REPORT - FEBRUARY 1990
4. FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT - FEBRUARY 1990
5. RESOLUTION N0. 36-90 - RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 3-81 AND
AUTHORIZING THE ADJUSTMENT AND SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS AGAINST
THE CITY
6. FINAL PARCEL MAP 16-899 9350 SANTA CRUZ RD. - Subdivision of
one parcel containing approximately 9.63 ac. into two lots
of 4.00 ac. and 5.63 ac. in the RS zone (Lobo Investments,
Inc./Pace)
7. REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURES - ATASCADERO
CRITERIUM, APRIL 29, 1990
S. SOLUTION NO. 38-90 - ESTABLISHMENT OF A NO PARKING ZONE ON
EL CAMINO REAL @ SANTA ROSA ROAD
9. RESOLUTION NO. 37-90 - ESTABLISHMENT OF A NO PARKING ZONE ON
EL CAMINO REAL, 150' NORTH OF THE ENTRANCE TO THE VILLA MAR-
GARITA MOBILE HOME PARK
10. RESOLUTION N0. 39-90 - ESTABLISHMENT OF A NO PARKING ZONE ON
CAPISTRANO FROM THE CALTRANS PARK-AND-RIDE TO THE NORTH EDGE
OF THE HOTEL PARK PROPERTY
11. RESOLUTION N0. 46-94 - ESTABLISHING A ROAD IMPROVEMENT STAN-
DARD DETAIL
12. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION BY-
LAWS
13. RESOLUTION NQ. -_44-90 - CITY OF ATASCADERO WASTE REDUCTION
AND PROCUREMENT POLICY (Recycling Committee)
CC4/10/90
Page 3
Councilwoman Borgeson asked to pull Item #5 for further
discussion.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey and seconded by Councilman
Shiers to approve the Consent Calendar with the
exception of Item #5; passed unanimously by roll call
vote.
5. RESOLUTION NO. 36-90 — RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 3-81 AND
AUTHORIZING THE ADJUSTMENT AND SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS AGAINST
THE CITY
Mark Joseph gave staff report recommending adoption of Resolution
No. 36-90 establishing the Risk Review Committee. He indicated
that the formation of this committee would expedite settlements,
streamline the process, place risk management on a higher
priority and ultimately save the City in litigation and insurance
costs.
Council discussion followed regarding the settlement authority of
$10,000. The City Attorney explained that he had suggested this
figure, but that the City Council had the discretion to change
that amount. Mr. Montandon further explained that this maximum
does not relate to cost savings on insurance premiums. He
reiterated that the Council will be kept informed of all claims
and implied if a claim needs to be settled on an emergency basis,
a special Council meeting can be called to do so. In addition,
he advised that the councilmember appointed to the committee did
not have to be an attorney.
There was no public comment.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey and seconded by Councilman
Shiers to adopt Resolution No. 36-90; passed
unanimously by roll call vote.
B. HgARINGS/APPEARANCES:
1. CONSIDERATION OF HERITAGE TREE REMOVAL REQUEST AS PART OF
PARCEL MAP APPLICATION (44-87) FOR THE PURPOSES OF ROAD
CONSTRUCTION BY OWNER RUSS JOHNSON AT OBISPO ROAD
Henry Engen gave staff report with the recommendation to approve
subject to a 2:1 replacement. Brief discussion followed
regarding the road alignment and possible alternatives.
The applicant was not present.
CC4/10/90
Page 4
There was no public comment.
Councilwoman Borgeson stated that she was in favor of the road
and that it would create better traffic flow.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson and seconded by Councilwoman
Mackey to approve the Heritage Tree Removal based upon
the recommendations of the City Arborist; passed
unanimously by voice vote.
2~ CONSIDERATION OF HERITAGE TREE REMOVAL REQUEST AS PART OF AN
APPLICATION FOR PRECISE PLAN 69_89 FOR THE PURPOSES OF HOME
CONSTRUCTIONw 14400 EL MONTE ROAD (Ranallette)
Mr. Engen gave staff report recommending the arborist's
reluctant approval, with a 4:1 replacement. The Community
Development Director described the property, proposed homesite
and septic system.
Lisa Schicker, City Arborist, reported that she had not consulted
with the applicants or architect before the home had been
designed. She indicated that a pre -design consultation might
have avoided the tree removal and given the Ranallettes a home
just as pleasing. Ms. Schicker reiterated the importance of pre -
site counseling.
Councilman Shiers commented that initially the applicants were
advised that the two trees were dead and asked the City Arborist
if they had been informed that this was not so. Ms. Schicker
responded that she knew the architect was aware of this, but was
not sure if the applicants themselves knew prior to receiving a
copy of her report.
Additional discussion followed regarding the notification of
public. Staff indicated that a Public Notice is printed in the
newspaper and that notice is also posted on the property
indicating the date of City Council hearings.
The applicant, Ann Ranallette, described the house as a two-story
one and indicated that attempts were made to protect the trees,
but that the septic system designated the building site.
The City Arborist explained, based on her discussion with the
architect, that she had interpreted the house to be one-story.
She stated that two of the floors have a few, small steps and
that the home has a large floor plan with slightly risen and
sunken levels.
The applicant answered Council questions regarding the condition
CC4/1U/9O
Page 5
0
of the trees. Mrs. Ranallette stated that she had originally
been told the trees were diseased and dying, and acknowledged
that it (time of inspection) may have been a bad time of year for
them. She added that there were over fifty other trees on the
property.
Mayor ProTem Lilley asked the applicant if any attempts to be re-
design the home were made after the Ranallettes were informed
that the trees were healthy. Mrs. Ranallette responded that they
had tried afew other designs, but because of the septic system,
the proposed site was the only one that would work.
Steve Casler, 14500 El Monte, spoke in opposition of the tree
removal request stating that he believed the applicants have
other options for the homesite. He reported that he himself had
worked with the Tree Committee in planning his own home and had
built it without removing any trees. Mr. Casler stated that
approval would impact both his and the applicant's property and
stressed concern for the two large trees. He urged the Council
to deny the request.
Additional discussion followed. Councilwoman Mackey explained
that she had not been able to find the site and therefore could
not vote on the matter. Mayor ProTem Lilley explained that he
was not sure if he had actually seen the site in question and
entertained a motion to continue.
MOTION: By Councilman Shiers and seconded by Councilwoman
Mackey to continue the matter to allow consultation
' between the architect and City Arborist for
consideration of optional building plans; carried 4:0.
�~
CONSIDERATION OF HERITAGE TREE REMOVAL REQUEST»7955 DEL RID
ROAD (Payne)
Henry Engen gave staff report recommending approval with a 2:1
replacement. He indicated that the site was heavily covered with
Oaks and that the applicant was requesting to replace the oak
with two purple leaf plums.
Discussion followed regarding noticing. Mr. Engen reported that
a sign is supposed to be visible from the street and a ribbon
placed upon the proposed tree. Ms. Schicker clarified for
Council that it is the applicant or the applicant's arborist who
is responsible for posting the notices, indicating that her
office sends the applicant the necessary posters and ribbons for
marking at least a week before the meeting.
CC4/10/90
Page 6
Councilwoman Borgeson noted that the applicant would have planted
the purple leaf plum trees anyway and stated that Mr. Payne might
be willing to donate some Oak trees to the City's Oak Nursery.
Councilman Shiers commented that the Tree Ordinance states the
removed trees shall be replaced with a similar native tree and
technically this tree should be replaced with native oaks rather
than the plums.
The applicant, David Payne residing at 7955 Del Rio Road, was
present and stated that he was, indeed, willing to donate two oak
trees to the Oak Nursery.
There was no public comment.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson and seconded by Councilwoman
Mackey to approve the Heritage Tree Removal Request;
passed unanimously by voice vote.
4. CONSIDERATION OF HERITAGE TREE REMOVAL REQUEST, 5715 SANTA
CRUZ (Lindsey/Hilltop Mobile Manor)
Henry Engen gave staff report indicating that the ribbon marking
the tree had been stolen, but that the tree had been identified
with an "X". The staff's recommendation, he explained, was for
approval with a 10:1 replacement.
Ms. Schicker clarified for Council that the applicant was
concerned over the safety of the elderly residents who walk to
the mailboxes daily. She expressed reluctance toward approving
the removal stating that she wished there was an alternative as
few trees get to be that big.
The applicant was not present. Mr. Engen reported that the
manager of the mobilehome park was recovering from surgery.
Council comments followed. Alternatives of moving the mailboxes
and/or driveway were discussed. In addition, issues of
replanting and forest rejuvenation with respect to the revision
of the Tree Ordinance were addressed.
There was no public comment.
MOTION: By Councilman Shiers and seconded by Councilwoman
Borgeson to continue the item until contact can be made
with the owner of the mobilehome park to discuss
alternatives of re -locating the mailboxes and roadway;
motion to continue unanimously carried.
CC4/10/90
Page 7
°
0
C. REGULAR MUN.E.99:
With the concurrence of
order of the first two
#C-2 first.
2. SOLID WASTE*
0
Council, Mayor ProTem Lilley reversed the
items of regular business taking up Item
A. LANDFILL FEE INCREASE
B. CONSIDERATION OF MANDATORY GARBAGE C��LL���%��
The City Manager advised that the two sub -matters be discussed as
Mark Joseph gave background on the landfill fee increase request
which would include "tipping fees" to cover the costs of a
comprehensive recycling study as required by new State
Legislation (AB939). He added that there would also be a minor
increase in the franchise fee the City collects to ensure Wil -
Mar's recovery of costs. Mr. Joseph reported that staff's
recommendation was for adoption of Resolution No. and
answered Council questions regarding the fees.
Councilwoman Borgeson stated that she was reluctant to approve a
rate increase of this size on the citizens of Atascadero. She
expressed that it is only fair for Wil -Mar to recover their
increased costs, but indicated that she had a problem with
funding the study because only those who take Wil -Mar's service
will be paying for it.
Councilwoman Mackey clarified that the Recycling Study is to be
a County -wide preparation of a nine -element report to the State
due by July 1991 and will be expensive to complete. She reported
that the Technical Committee for the Solid Waste Task Force had
recommended the increased "tipping fee" of $1.00 per ton in order
to fund this study.
Councilwoman Borgeson reiterated that Wil -Mar customers in
Atascadero will be paying this extra dollar. Councilwoman Mackey
indicated that the issue of mandatory garbage collection has been
raised, in part, to spread the costs to all.
Representing Wil -Mar Disposal CO-_,__Ln_c,
Luci Dalton, on behalf of Betty R. Sanders of the law firm of
Wright & Sanders, read the attached letter (see Exhibit A) asking
Council to grant Wil -Mar Disposal's request for a fee increase
and support the concept of mandatory garbage collection.
CC4/1O/90
Page 8
0 •
David K. Smith, C.P.A., answered questions from Council regarding
the preparation of the proposal submitted by Wil -Mar Disposal.
He clarified that the 5% franchise fee is charged by the City and
the $1.00 tipping fee is mandated by the County, and that it was
quite appropriate for Wil -Mar to pass these increases on to its'
customers. The accountant stated that whether or not it is fair
for the governing agencies to assess these fees is another issue
altogether, one which Wil -Mar has no control over.
With respect to mandatory garbage collection, Mayor ProTem Lilley
asked Mr. Smith if the proration of the landfill increase would
need to be re -calculated. The CPA responded that it would not,
as the costs have been determined on a per -yard basis. He stated
that if mandatory pick-up became a reality, other costs would
need to be re-examined and advised that the cost per service may
decline in some areas.
Public Comments:
George Zidbeck, 1869 San Fernando Road, recognized the need for a
dumping fee increase stating that he will pay for it at the dump.
He suggested a one-time fee for all residents of the County to
pay for the Recycling Study, but opposed the mandate of full -
garbage pick-up.
Whitey Thorpe, 8825 Santa Ynez, opposed mandatory collection
stating that citizens should take more responsibility for their
garbage. He declared that government has had too much control
and stressed the benefits of burning, salvaging and composting.
He insisted that Wil -Mar's recent addition of the 2 -can garbage
container has already allowed for an increase in fees. He urged
the Council to accept free enterprise, even in trash collection.
Jerry Bond, 4840 E1 Verano, supported the landfill rate increase
but strongly opposed mandatory garbage collection.
Bob Nimmo, 7375 Bella Vista, stated that the City cannot allow
the garbage company to go broke and implied that most
responsible citizens would accept mandatory garbage pick-up and
the rate increase rather than having a city that is cluttered
with trash. He expressed concern over the fact that
irresponsible citizens are dumping their garbage into other
people's dumpsters and asserted that it was time for the issue
of mandatory garbage collection be constructively addressed.
Mr. Nimmo urged the Council to take positive action on both
matters.
Mike Tobey, 8193 San Dimas, objected to mandatory garbage
CC4/10/90
Page 9
collection claiming that it would be
He additionally opposed the commercial
businesses should not be charged more
stressed that the differential is wrong
probably cancel all services if passed.
an invasion of his rights.
rate increase stating that
than residents. Mr. Tobey
and noted that he would
Larry Sherwin, 2755 Campo Road, opposed mandatory garbage pick-
up. He reported that three of his neighbors have recently spent
$60,000 to put in the road he lives ,lust off of and that the road
is not City -maintained. He expressed concern over the wear and
tear it would receive from the added traffic of garbage trucks.
Mr. Sherwin urged the Council to allow people to get rid of their
own garbage as long as they do it in the appropriate place. He
added that animals are responsible for getting into garbage and
spreading it through our town.
Ralph Gatos, 7770 Valle, commended the Recycling Committee for
its' earlier report describing it as eye-opening. He supported
the committee's suggestion of allowing pick-up of individual
trash bags, stating that he and his wife do not generate much
garbage but opposed mandatory collection. Mr. Gatos asked if
Wil -Mar had a vacation credit. Mr. Gibbs answered that it does.
Mayor ProTem Lilley called for a recess at 9:22 p.m. The meeting
reconvened at 9:45 p.m.
Mr. Lilley recapped the issues and reported that staff
recommendation with respect to mandatory garbage collection was
for further review and Council direction.
Lengthy Council discussion followed. Councilwoman Borgeson
stated that trash pick-up services should be put out to bid to
ensure cost-effectiveness. She indicated that she was not in
favor of mandatory garbage pick-up and that the concept requires
more staff research.
Acknowledging earlier public comment regarding the issue of
competition, Councilman Shiers indicated that monopolies are
typically granted by government agencies because of the large
economies of scale. He stated that it is often cheaper, on a
per-unit basis, to have only one firm provide service. The
Councilman noted that fees should be decreased if we are going to
have mandatory trash pick-up and only have one company provide
that service if, in fact, it can do so because of large economies
of scale. He added that further review of the fee structure
should be done and recommended giving direction to staff to study
what might happen to fees with mandatory garbage pick-up and
establish if the per-unit costs could be reduced if only one
CC4/10/90
Page 10
company provides service or if there is room for competition.
Councilwoman Mackey reported that she had been approached by two
citizens who were against mandatory garbage collection and
recognized that there are those who will not be happy with this
concept. She advised that Atascadero is the only city in the
County which does not have mandatory garbage collection. She
continued that the County is mandating that the urbanized areas
in the rest of the County under their jurisdiction have
mandatory collection and explained that she could not see how
Atascadero could avoid it. Ms. Mackey questioned whether
mandatory garbage collection would be required within the Urban
Services Line or within the total City limits and concurred that
the issue needs more staff study. In addition, Councilwoman
Mackey was in support of a pass-through increase for Wil -Mar and
suggested a flat percentage for both residential and commercial
customers.
Mayor ProTem Lilley stated that although he was hesitant to
regulate his neighbors, he failed to see how the City could meet
the goal of 25% reduction in waste within five years unless
everyone is part of the system. Mr. Lilley continued that he was
in favor of mandatory garbage pick-up and that unless the Council
was ready to impose this regulation in the very -near future, was
in support of approving the present rate increase. He expressed
concern about the fee structure and although he supported Wil -
Mar's request to recoup their added fees, stressed that the
Council has an obligation to the community to ensure that the
rates are prorated fairly. Additionally, Mr. Lilley's comments
echoed those of Councilman Shiers with respect to the economies
of scale.
Councilwoman Mackey asked for an explanation of the rate
percentages. Mark Joseph reported that he had based the
percentages on the current service level and pass-through figures
calculated by Mr. Smith. He added that the additional AH939
study and franchise fees are based on one dollar per ton. If
those fees were deducted, he speculated, there would still be a
variation in percentages.
Mr. Smith noted that if the City were to establish mandatory
garbage pick-up, it would require a complete re -analysis of the
rate structure. He stated that if the City imposes mandated
pick-up, some costs would decrease on a per customer basis, but
other costs may increase because of the added services. The CPA
advised that the rates reflect a direct pass-through based on a
per -yard cost and added that no percentages were considered at
the time he completed his analysis.
CC4/10/90
Page 11
Councilwoman Borgeson expressed concern about the franchise fee
increase. The City Attorney advised that the 5% increase could
be deleted. Mr. Joseph explained that administratively there may
be some implications for Wil -Mar and that the City would lose
that additional revenue.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson and seconded by Mayor ProTem
Lilley to adopt Resolution 45-90, passed unanimously by
roll call vote.
Additional discussion followed regarding mandatory garbage pick-
up. The City Manager suggested, in light of comments from Wil -
Mar's CPA and Council, that the issue be referred back to staff
with direction to meet with Wil -Mar to provide applicable data to
report back for further review as part of another formal, noticed
hearing.
Members of Council made further comments reflecting their
concerns. Mayor ProTem Lilley asked for a cost estimate if pick-
up became mandated.
Councilwoman Mackey asked for an evaluation of costs for pick-up
within the City limits versus within the Urban Services Line.
She also made note of the letter received from Dean E.
Wooldridge, Jr. of Atascadero who requested consideration of
lower rates for certain households.
Councilwoman Borgeson reiterated that a bid process should be
used if mandatory pick-up is considered. She continued that
issues of maintaining the roads and liability should be addressed
as well.
The City Manager indicated that staff will go over all concerns
of Council and come back with an in-depth report.
Councilman Shiers stated that he would like to see the cost study
be done as completely as possible with an indication of how much
mandatory garbage pick-up will actually go towards reducing the
amount of solid waste.
Mayor ProTem Lilley asked for specific, comparative information
on what kind of effect the various recycling programs within the
City would have with and without mandatory garbage collection.
Mr. Lilley referred back to the scheduled agenda, Item #C-1.
CC4/10/90
Page 12
0
1. CONSIDERATION OF FISCAL PLANNING MODEL SERVICES -
RECOMMEN—
DATION OF REVIEW PANEL AND STAFF
Henry Engen gave staff report with the recommendation to
authorize the City Manager to negotiate and enter into a contract
with Crawford, Multari and Starr to prepare Task 3: Long -Range
Financial Analysis and General Plan Policies review for a Fiscal
Planning Model, not to exceed $40,000. Mr. Engen introduced
Michael Multari and Dr. Steven French from the consulting firm,
who were present in the audience.
The Community Development Director responded to questions from
Council. Councilwoman Mackey asked what the payment terms would
be, to which Mr. Engen stated that the firm was flexible and open
for negotiation.
Councilwoman Borgeson inquired if additional staff would be
needed. The City Manager clarified that no additional personnel
would be hired in order to complete the study.
Councilwoman Borgeson indicated support and elaborated on the
benefits. The City Manager added that the study would give the
Council a number of tools to allow for more effective decisions
with respect to land use.
Mayor ProTem Lilley endorsed the study stating that it
represented a part of responsible government and entertained a
motion to approve.
MOTION: By Councilman Shiers and seconded by Councilwoman
Borgeson to direct staff to enter into negotiations for
Task 3 with the consultants, Crawford, Multari and
Starr; unanimously passed by roll call vote.
The City Manager indicated, for the record, that Mayor Dexter was
in support of the fiscal planning model.
(Item C-2 discussed previously)
3, - ESTABLISHMENT OF STOP SIGN ON OLD
MORRO ROAD EAST AT THE INTERSECTION WITH LOS OSOS ROAD
(Traffic Committee recommendation)
Henry Engen gave background and staff recommendation to approve
Resolution No. 19-90 which would establish a stop sign on Old
Morro Road East at Los Osos Road. He stated that the present
stop sign would remain.
CC4/1O/9O
Page 13
M
i
i
Mike Tobey, 6193 San Dimas, asked the Police Chief how many
incidents had been reported in that area. Chief McHale explained
that the incident rate there was very low. Mr. Tobey suggested
that other areas need the attention more than this one and asked
to leave well enough alone.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson and seconded by Mayor ProTem
Lilley to deny both requests and leave the intersection
unchanged; motion carried 3:1 with Councilwoman Mackey
voting against the denial.
4. DISPOSITION OF SAN BENITO LOT:
A. RESOLUTION N0. 42-90 — ABANDONING A PORTION OF SAN
BENITO ROAD SUBJECT TO FOUR (4) CONDITIONS
B. RESOLUTION NO. 43-90 — AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A PUR—
CHASE AND SALES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND MICHAEL
L. FREDERICK FOR THE CITY PROPERTY CONTAINED WITHIN THE
SAN BENITO ROAD ABANDONMENT
Henry Engen gave background and recommendation to approve both
resolutions. He explained the sales agreement and conditions of
approval noting that as a condition of the sale, the
nonconforming lot of record would be merged with the adjoining
property owned by Mr. Fredericks, and that the City would retain
an easement for potential sewer and pump station.
Greg Ravatt, architect representing Mr. Frederick, addressed the
Council offering to answer any questions. There were none.
There was no public comment.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey and seconded by Mayor ProTem
Lilley to approve Resolution 42-90; passed unanimously
by voice vote.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey and seconded by Mayor ProTem
Lilley to approve Resolution 43-90; unanimously carried
by roll call vote.
5. PROPOSED ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF MARCHANT WAY RIGHT—OF—
WAY ADJACENT TO LOT 79 AT 9590 MARCHANT WAY AND PROPERTY
EXCHANGE BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AND MURRAY WARDEN:
A. RESOLUTION NO, 40-90 — ABANDONING A PORTION OF MARCHANT
WAY SUBJECT TO FIVE (5) CONDITIONS
CC4/10/90
Page 14
B. RESOLUTION Nips 41-90 —
TION THERETO
EXCHANGING PROPERTIES IN RELA—
Henry Engen gave his report recommending approval of both
resolutions stating that by doing so, the Council could clean up
this property issue.
Brief Council discussion followed. Mr. Warden was present and
availed himself for questions. There was no public comment.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey and seconded by Councilman
Shiers to approve Resolution No. 40-90; passed
unanimously by voice vote.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey and seconded by Councilman
Shiers to approve Resolution No. 41-90; motion
unanimously carried by roll call vote.
b. HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION EVENT - June 2. 1990
The City Manager recapped that Council had discussed this item
and had agreed to participate in a county -wide household
hazardous waste collection day. He stated that the original
estimated cost to the City, based on a per capita basis formula,
was for around $28,000. Mr. Windsor referred to a letter
received from G.H. Rowland, M.D., County Health Director and
explained that those costs have escalated considerably. He
indicated that the per capita basis funding has been changed to
an individual participant basis and reported that the estimated
cost would be $90 to $100 per participant for disposing of
household hazardous waste. He advised that he was uncomfortable
with now not having any indication of what the true cost would
be.
Additionally, he stated that the location would not be in the
North County as originally hoped for, but in San Luis Obispo,
and speculated a lower participation because of this.
Councilwoman Mackey indicated that it has been determined that
three events are needed, but that the Solid Waste Commission had
voted to go ahead with one event for now. She reported that
there is no way of knowing what the actual cost will be until a
collection day is held. Ms. Mackey explained that the County
will bill the City for each Atascadero participant after the
fiscal year and added that each person will be required to show
identification and fill out a detailed form.
CC4/10/90
Page 15
Council discussion followed regarding the cost and site location.
Mayor ProTem Lilley stated that he would like to see some
cooperation with the City of Paso Robles to put together a
hazardous waste disposal day in the North County. He stated that
it was of questionable merit to ask the people in this area to
load up their hazardous materials and drive Cuesta Grade to
dispose of them. He added that he would expect a poor turn -out
and expressed concern that the drive to San Luis Obispo itself
will not deter participation. Councilwoman Mackey advised that
there has not been a representative from Paso Robles at the
meetings. The City Manager offered to make inquiries as to
possible locations in Paso Robles.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey and seconded by Councilman
Shiers to extend the meeting past 11:00 p.m.; all were
in favor.
Discussion continued. The City Manager relayed his discomfort
over this matter stating that there are too many unknowns and was
hesitant to commit the Council to something they were
uncomfortable with. Mayor ProTem Lilley expressed opposition to
the last-minute changes and lack of exact costs.
Mr. Windsor added that he feels dissention among all the
communities about whether or not to be involved in this event.
Councilwoman Mackey agreed, but reiterated her support of going
ahead with a one -day event despite the lack of firm figures.
The City Manager agreed with the councilwoman and recommended
going ahead with the event. He added that the City needs a
program to determine what the affects are to be and supported a
cooperative effort with other communities in the North County to
establish a collection location which would meet State standards.
MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey and seconded by Councilwoman
Borgeson to confirm with County of San Luis Obispo
Atascadero's participation in a one -day hazardous waste
event on June 2, 1990 at Camp San Luis; motion carried
3:1, with Mayor ProTem Lilley opposing.
7. ATASCADERO BABE RUTH — REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL NON—PROFIT
ORGANIZATION FUNDING
The City Manager gave staff report recommending approval.
Councilwoman Borgeson was in support. There was no public
comment.
CC4/10/90
Page 16
MOTION: By Councilwoman Borgeson and seconded by Councilwoman
Mackey to approve the request for additional funds;
passed unanimously by roll call vote.
D. :
1. City Councils
A. CoMmittee Reports (The following represents ad hoc or
standing committees. Informative status reports will
be given, as felt necessary.):
1. City/School Committee - The City Manager announced the
next meeting as May 9, 1990.
2. North Coastal Transit - Councilwoman Borgeson stated
that there would be an upcoming meeting and that she
would bring back a report at another date.
The City Manager announced that as part of Earth Week,
April 17, 1990 has been designated as Free Transit Day.
and asked Council for approval to participate. Council
was in agreement and the Mr. Windsor stated that he
would see that the City received the necessary
publicity.
3. S.L.O. Area Coordinating Council - No report.
4. Traffic Committee (Bee Items A-8, 9, 10 & C-3)
5. Solid/Hazardous Waste Mgmt. Committee (See Items C -2-A
& B)
6. Recycling Committee (See Item A-13)
7. Economic Opportunity Commission - No report.
B. B.I.A. (See Item A-12)
9. Downtown Steering Committee - Henry Engen announced
that a public hearing had been scheduled for May 10,
1990 at 7:00 p.m. to review the Draft Atascadero
Downtown Master Plan. Mayor ProTem Lilley stated that
this was a major event and wanted to see lots of
publicity.
10. General Plan Subcommittee - Henry Engen reported that
the next meeting would be April 11, 1990 at 4:00 p.m.
CC4/10/9O
Page 17
Councilwoman Mackey announced that she would be away during the
regular meeting of the Council scheduled for April 24, 1990.
2. City Attorney - No report.
3. City Clerk - No report.
4, City Attorney - No report.
5~ City Manager
Mr. Windsor announced that the city -sponsored Big Chill Night
was a success and that $1,000 was to be donated to the Lake
Pavilion Fund. In that regard, he explained that he had been
contacted by the committee who asked that the $5,000 donated by
Warner Bros. be released to them to be placed into the same
account so that advantage could be taken of the additional
interest earned. Council was in concurrence.
Mayor ProTem Lilley recognized Andy Takata, Director of Parks,
Recreation & Zoo for the department's efforts.
The City Manager, addressing a separate item, asked Council to
schedule a closed session for the purpose of hearing a
presentation from Becker & Bell on up -coming employee
negotiations and to discuss the proposed purchase of property
located in the 9000 Block of Morro Road. He suggested a meeting
date of Thursday, April 19, 1998 at 3:00 p.m. stating said
meeting would be held in the Club Room. Discussion followed and
Council agreed to that date.
THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 81:20 P.M. TO A CLOSED SESSION ON
THURSDAY* APRIL 19v 1990 AT 3sOO P.M.
-------- -`'
CITY LLhKK
Attachment: Exhibit A (Sanders)
CC4/1O/9O
Page 18
r
WILLIAM D. WRIGHT (RETIRED)
BETTY R. SANDERS
City Council
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero, CA 93422
WRIGHT & SANDERS
A LAW CORPORATION
5950 ENTRADA AVENUE
ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93422
Ladies and Gentlemen of the Council:
4 Exh. A
April 10, 1990
TELEPHONE
(805) 466-9026
FAX
(805) 466-9098
I have asked that this letter be read to you in my
absence, an absence which I sorely regret.
As many of you know, I believe very strongly that
mandatory collection of solid waste is extremely important for all
the citizens of Atascadero.
You have been advised of the necessity to reduce the
solid waste stream in order to comply with new State law. You
doubtless know the penalty for non-compliance.
I further believe that each of you appreciates the value
of preserving our environment and that each of you understands the
necessity of fuel involvement by all of us in this endeavor.
For this reason we believe that mandatory solid waste
collection is a logical first step toward waste reduction mandated
by State law. If we are to have a viable plan for waste reduction
we must be able to identify source generation.
Further, a curbside recycling plan can only operate
effectively if there is full participation by everyone. It would
bepatently unfair to expect the residents currently paying for
garbage collection to subsidize the ones who do not. Therefore,
from an equity point of view, mandatory collection is the fairest
and least burdensome method for achieving our goal.
We therefore respectfully request that this Council
direct staff to go forward with all due diligence to prepare a
resolution adopting mandatory collection within the city limits of
the City of Atascadero.
Very t.ruly yours,
BETT"SANDERS
.
BRS/baw