HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-031 Brown & Caldwell - Deisgn Wastewater Treatment CITY • E
GONTpACT�l�C
CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR THE DESIGN OF THE
CITY OF ATASCADERO WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
UPGRADE IMPROVEMENTS, STAGE 1
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF
ATASCADERO, hereinafter referred to as "City", and BROWN AND CALDWELL
hereinafter referred to as "Consultant".
Witnesseth that for and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the
parties hereto agree as follows:
Article 1 - Authorization
A. Consultant will perform the services under this Agreement upon receipt of the
Notice to Proceed issued by the City Manager.
B. The following exhibits are attached hereto, and incorporated herein, by reference
as though here fully set forth.
1. Exhibit A - Fee Proposal, Cost Estimate, Scope of Work
2. Exhibit B - Fee Proposal, Addendum No. 2
3. Exhibit C - Fee Proposal, Addendum No. 3
4. Exhibit D - Fee Schedules
Article 2 - Responsibilities of Consultant
A. Consultant will provide to the City of Atascadero all of the necessary services
required to design the Stage 1 upgrade improvements to the City wastewater
treatment facility as outlined in Exhibit A as modified by Exhibits B and C and as de-
scribed in the Preliminary Design Report prepared by Brown and Caldwell dated May
1997. The services shall include, but not be limited to, the preparation of a
complete, bid-ready set of contract documents (plans, specifications and estimates)
required for the construction of the Stage 1 improvements even if such services are
beyond those outlined in Exhibit A as modified by Exhibits B and C.
B. In the performance of Consultant's service under this Agreement, Consultant agrees
that he will maintain such coordination with City officials as may be requested and
desirable, including primary coordination with the Project Coordinator, herein
designated as the City Engineer.
C. Insofar as they may be applicable to the project contemplated by this Agreement,
Consultant shall render the services outlined in Exhibit A as modified by Exhibits B
Wastewater Treatment Facility Consultant Services Agreement
Stage 1 Upgrade Improvements Page 1 of 7
and C commencing with receipt of a written Notice to Proceed signed by the City
Manager.
Article 3 - Responsibilities of City
A. The City will cooperate with the Consultant on all phases of the services covered by
this Agreement and will make available to him, as his needs indicate, all existing
maps, topographic maps, aerial photographs, soils reports, and other similar data in
possession of City covering the site as selected.
B. At its option, the City will provide the surveying services outlined in Exhibit A. The
Consultant shall provide the City with a detailed schedule which identifies the
required completion date of each
City esurvey tasks no later than fivel'(5)din workXng days fromhibit A. the
schedule shall be submitted to
date the Notice to Proceed is issued.
Article 4 Fee and Provision for Payment
A. The City will pay the Consultant a fee of not to exceed $142,650.00 for the design
services outlined in Exhibit A as modified by Exhibits B and C and as contracted
under this Agreement.
the
B. The City will pay the Consultant n Exhibitfnot A asto exceed mod Pied by ExhibitOs Brand C and as
geotechnical services outlined
contracted under this Agreement.
C. The City will pay the Consultant a fee of not to exceed $8,000.00 for the surveying
services outlined in Exhibit A as contracted under this Agreement. There shall be no
compensation to the Consultant for surveying services should the City elect to
provide such services.
D. The not-to-exceed fee for design, geotechnical and surveying services shall be bid-
considered full compensation for all the services required to prepare a complete,
ready set of contract documents rin Exhibit A apgmodefiedradprovements even by Exhibits B andfCuch
services are beyond those outlined
E. Consultant shall submit mo progressthly xhib t A as modif d by Exhibits Bland C.
completion of each task specified iE
F. Consultant will be paid no later than thiicerAny 0) days lgcable hourly rate receipt by City f
Consultant's progress report and invo y addit onal app
billings as authorized in Article 5 shall be based on the Fee Schedules incorporated
into this Agreement as Exhibit D.
Consultant Services Agreement
Wastewater Treatment Facility
Page 2 of 7
Stage 1 Upgrade Improvements
Article 5 Payment for Extra Services or Changes
Any claim for payment for extra services or changes in the services will be paid by City
only upon certification by the City Manager that the claimed extra service or change was
authorized in advance by the Project Coordinator and the City Manager, and that the
service has been satisfactorily completed. Invoices for extra services which are approved
by the Project Coordinator and City Manager must be submitted by Consultant within
thirty (30) days of completion of such services and must be accompanied by a statement
of itemized costs covering said services.
Article 6 Suspension or Termination of Agreement
A. If Consultant fails to comply with the conditions of the Agreement, City may, by
written notice of the Project Coordinator and the City Manager, suspend the
Agreement and withhold further payments pending corrective action by Consultant or
a decision to terminate the Agreement. After receipt of notice of suspension,
Consultant may not incur additional obligations of Agreement funds during the
suspension unless specifically authorized by the Project Coordinator and the City
Manager.
B. Either party hereto shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon giving ten
(10) days written notice of such termination of this project in its entirety,
notwithstanding any other fee provisions of this Agreement, based upon services
accomplished by Consultant prior to notice of such termination. Consultant shall be
entitled to the reasonable value of his services involved in the termination, as
determined by City, upon a finding which shall be final and conclusive as to the
amount of fee due and owing.
Article 7 - Time of Completion
Consultant agrees to diligently pursue the services under this Agreement and to complete
the all of the services described in Exhibit A as modified by Exhibit B to the point of
providing a complete submittal of contract documents for the Stage 1 upgrade
improvements of the City wastewater treatment facility within 160 working days from
receipt of the written Notice to Proceed signed by the City Manager. Consultant shall
not be responsible for any delay which is caused by City review, action or inaction of
City and/or any state or federal agency, or acts of God, but shall be responsible for his
own fault or negligence or that of any of his subcontractors.
Article 8 - Conflicts of Interest
No member, officer, or employee of City, during his or her tenure, or for one (1) year
thereafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement or the proceeds
thereof.
Wastewater Treatment Facility Consultant Services Agreement
Stage 1 Upgrade Improvements Page 3 of 7
Article 9 - Ownership of Data
The ownership of all data collected for use by Consultant under this Agreement, together
with working papers, drawings, and other materials necessary for a complete
understanding of the plans and necessary for the practical use of the plans shall be
vested in City. Ownership of original drawings and documents shall be vested in City.
Consultant may retain a copy of all work for his own use.
Article 10 - Covenant Against Contingent Fees
Consultant warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other
than a bona fide employee working solely for him, to solicit or secure this Agreement,
and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than bona fide
employee working solely for him, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift,
or any other consideration contingent on or resulting from the award or making of this
Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to annul
this Agreement without liability or, in its discretion, to deduct from the contract price or
consideration or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage
fee, gift, or contingency.
Article 11 - Contract Personnel
The services to be done pursuant to this Agreement shall be done by Brown and
Caldwell and such other personnel in the employ or under the supervision of Consultant
who shall be approved by City. The City official who shall be vested with the right of
approval of such additional personnel or outside contracting parties shall be the City
Manager. City reserves the right to reject any of Consultant's personnel or proposed
outside consultants, and City reserves the right to request that acceptable replacement
personnel be assigned to the project.
Article 12 - Indemnity Clause
Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and save harmless the City of Atascadero, its officers,
agents, and employees, from any and all claims, demands, damages, costs, expenses, and
liabilities arising out of this Agreement or occasioned by the negligent performance of
the provisions hereof including, but not limited to, any negligent act or omission to act
on the part of Consultant or his agents or employees or independent contractors directly
responsible to him, except that the above shall not apply to the negligence or willful
misconduct of City or City's agents, servants, or independent contractors who are directly
responsible to City. This indemnification provision shall apply even if there is concurrent
or joint negligence of indemnitor and indemnitee, and even if there is active or passive
negligence by either or both parties.
Article 13 - Insurance
A. Errors and Omissions Insurance. Consultant shall obtain and maintain, at his own
expense, prior to commencement of the work of this Agreement, professional liability
Wastewater Treatment Facility Consultant Services Agreement
Stage 1 Upgrade Improvements Page 4 of 7
(errors and omissions) insurance, in a company authorized to issue such insurance'in
the State of California, with limits of liability of not less than $1,000,000 to cover all
professional services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Such insurance shall be
kept in force for one (1) year beyond the date of Notice of Completion of the project
as accepted by the City Council.
B. Automobile and Public Liability Insurance. Consultant shall also maintain in full
force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, automobile insurance and public
liability insurance with an insurance carrier satisfactory to City, which insurance shall
include protection against claims arising from personal injury, including death-
resulting therefrom, and damage to property resulting from any actual occurrence
arising out of the performance of this Agreement. The amounts of insurance shall be
not less than the following:
1 . Single limit coverage applying to bodily and personal injury, including death
resulting therefrom, and property damage or a combination thereof in an amount
not less than $500,000.
The following endorsements must be attached to the policy or policies:
1 . If the insurance policy covers on an "accident" basis, it must be changed to
"occurrence".
2. The policy must cover personal injury as well as bodily injury.
3. Broad form property damage liability must be afforded.
4. The City of Atascadero, its officers, employees, and agents, shall be named as
insured under the policy, and the policy shall stipulate that the insurance will
operate as primary insurance and that no other insurance effected by City will be
called upon to contribute to a loss hereunder.
5. The policy shall contain contractual liability, either on a blanket basis or by
identifying this Agreement within a contractual liability endorsement.
6. The policy shall contain "cross-liability" such that each insured is covered as if
separate policies had been issued to each insured.
7. City shall be given thirty (30) days notice prior to cancellation or reduction in
coverage of the insurance.
C. Workers Compensation Insurance. In accordance with the provisions of Section
3700 of the Labor Code, Consultant shall be insured against liability for workers
compensation or undertake self-insurance. Consultant agrees to comply with such
provisions before commencing performance of any services under this Agreement..
D. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall submit to the City Manager all certificates
of insurance evidencing that Consultant has the insurance required by this Agreement
Wastewater Treatment Facility Consultant Services Agreement
Page 5 of 7
Stage 1 Upgrade Improvements
within ten ((10) days after receipt of Notice of Award. Said certificates shall state the
project number and that the policy shall not be assigned, canceled, or reduced in
coverage without thirty (30) days written notice to City, and that such insurance not
relieve or decrease the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for
payment of damages resulting from any service or operation performed pursuant to
this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform any services under this Agreement until
the required insurance certificates have been submitted to City and approved by these
provisions, or fails or refuses to furnish City required proof that insurance has been
procured and is in force and paid for, City shall have the right, at its discretion, to
forthwith terminate this Agreement.
Article 14 - Status
Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an
independent contractor, and in no event shall any of his personnel or subcontractors be
construed to be employees of City.
Article 15 - Non-Discrimination
Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Presidential Executive Order No. 1.1246
of September 24, 1965, and all other orders, regulations, and laws governing non-
discrimination in employment, including in particular, Section 122(a) of the State and
Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972.
Article 16 - Modification of Agreement
This Agreement may be further modified only by a written amendment signed by both
parties hereto.
Article 17 - Law Governing
This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.
Article 18 - Communications
Communications between the parties to this Agreement may be sent to the following
address:
City: CITY OF ATASCADERO
6500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero, CA 93422
Attn: Steven J. Sylvester, City Engineer
Wastewater Treatment Facility Consultant Services Agreement
Stage 1 Upgrade Improvements Page 6 of 7
Consultant: BROWN AND CALDWELL
16735 Von Karman, Suite 200
Irvine, CA. 72714-4918
ACCEPTED AND AGREED this the t_day of ) 19 'K
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CONS AN
a munici I co rat* Brow and C I well.
By By
arold arde' III, ayor n
ATTEST:
Printed Name
Marcia Torgerson, City CI rk ` I,O'n- VIP
Title
AP ROVED AS TO FORM:
Roy . Hanley, City A orney
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
4tev'en ZJ. Sjy1ter, ity Engineer
K:\U SERS\J B N\94182\B ROW N 02.AG R
Wastewater Treatment Facility Consultant Services Agreement
Stage 1 Upgrade Improvements Page 7 of 7
EXHIBIT A
FEE PROPOSAL
SCOPE OF WORK
COST ESTIMATE
Consultant Services Agreement
Wastewater Treatment Facility
Stage 1 Upgrade Improvements
OF ATASCADERO
DEPARTMENT of PUBLIC WORKS
�i�nnh, ain i�lIl
1918 A V 19791 -
C
Fee Proposal
Wastewater Treatment Facility
Stage 1 Upgrade
OCTOBER 7, 1997
1
BR0WN -AND
C A L D W E L L
October 7, 1997
' Mr. John Neil
Assistant City Engineer
City of Atascadero
I6500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero, California 93422 12-9475-22
Subject: City of Atascadero
Wastewater Treatment Facility Stage 1. Upgrade- Fee Proposal
tDear Mr. Neil:
' In response to your recent request we have revised our August, 1997 fee proposal. In this
submittal we have revised the project scope of work, identified the personnel we plan to assign
to the project, included detailed proposals from our geotechnical and surveying subcontractors,
included our current fee schedule, individual resumes, and updated our fee estimate per changes
in the scope of work.
I Our project team will continue to be managed by Azee Malik. The team is tailored to meet the
specific needs of the Phase 1 design. Individuals we plan to assign to the project are listed
below and their full resumes are included in Attachment A. The Preliminary Design Project
team. will continue to work on the project and they are supported by specialists who have
extensive experience in wastewater treatment plant design.
rProposed Project Team
Project Manager Azee Malik, P.E.
• Technical Advisor Warren Uhte, P.E.
Quality Control Michael Anderson, P.E.
Mechanical Design Kirk Saiki, P.E.
• Process Design Marguerita Stone, P.E.
t' • Structural Design Raymond Nieh, S.E.
• Electrical/Instrumentation Design Alan Vause, P.E.
' Cost Estimation Marc Pritchard, C.C.E.
• Principal-in-Charge Pervaiz Anwar, P.E.
• Geotechnical Subconsultant Fugro West, Inc.
s ' Surveying Subconsultant Engineering Development Associates
Environmental Engineering And Consulting•Analytical Services (� i , JG
ft 61 lam. ;
eAproposa1\9475-22 16735 Vo^ KARMAN, SUITE 200, IRVINE, CA 92714-4918 ! 1
' (714) 660-1070 FAX (714) 474-0940 �
PUBLIC WORKS
nrTv nc AT+(1rJr)C0A
Mr. John Neil
.1
October 7, 1997
Page-2`-
We propose to complete this phase of our contract on a lump sum basis. The Scope of Work
our fee estimate is based on is presented in Attachment B. A detailed breakdown of each task's
effort in hours and dollars to complete the proposed scope of work and our fee schedule is
presented in Attachment C. Our subconsultant proposals are presented in Attachment D.
Project costs are broken down as follows:
Engineering Labor and Expenses $230,630
Geotechnical Services
Sludge Drying Beds and Administration
Building Borings and Report $6,700
Percolation Pond Investigation and Report $2,900
Water Reuse Well Investigation and Report $8,700
Surveying Services
Aerial Control Survey $1,500
State plane Coordinate System $800
Aerial Topographic Mapping $4,200
Detailed Topographic Survey $1,500
Thank you very much for the opportunity to submit this scope of work and engineering services
cost estimate. Please call if you need additional information.
Very truly yours,
SAND CALDWELL
l�
V Pery Anwar
Senior Vice President
C;
Azee Malik
Project Manager
PA:AM:MS
eApcoposa1\9475-22
�I
ITY OF
RW
ATASCADERO
Pervaiz Anwar, P.E.
TViaelAnderson, P.E. Azhar(Azee) Malik, P.E. Warren Uhte, P.E.
GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN TEAM SURVEYING
Fugro West, Inc. ■ Process Design....... . ... Marguerita Stone, P.E. EDA
. Mechanical Design. . . . . ... Kirk Saiki, P.E.
Jon Blanchard, P.E. Michael Stanton, P.E.
PROJECT ENGINEER ■ Structural Design......... Raymond Nieh, P.E. PROJECT ENGINEER
Paul Sorensen, R.G. ■ Electrical/Instrumentation.. Alan Vause, P.E.
SENIOR HYDROGEOLOGIST . Cost Estimation..... . . . .. . Marc Pritchard,C.C.E.
PROJECT TEAM ORGANIZATION
- SCOPE OF WORK
Work Plan This section presents our understanding of the scope of work which Brown
and Caldwell believes necessary to design Stage 1 facilities to upgrade the
City of Atascadero's Wastewater Treatment Plant. The task descriptions
represent our understanding of your needs based on the findings presented in
_ the City of Atascadero's Wastewater Treatment Facility Upgrade
Preliminary Design Report, dated May 1997.
The scope of work presented below is divided into tasks and subtasks.
Project Tasks are listed in the order that they will be performed in the
engineering effort; however, many tasks will proceed simultaneously.
STAGE 1 - FINAL DESIGN
t ;
Task 1.0 Meetings/Quality Control
Task 1.1 Conduct a "kick-off/brainstorming" meeting with the City's engineering and
Kickoff/ operations staff at the start of the design to discuss detailed design
Ll Brainstorming preferences for the Stage 1 treatment plant upgrade facilities. It is
Meeting anticipated that the session will be conducted at the City's offices. Minutes
of the brainstorming session will be prepared and distributed to all
concerned.
Task 1.2 Conduct 40- percent design review meeting with City staff. Prepare and
40 Percent Design distribute meeting notes to all attendees.
Review Meeting
' Task 1.3 Conduct 85 - percent design review meeting with City staff. Prepare and
85 Percent Design distribute meeting notes to all attendees.
Review Meeting
Task 1.4 Conduct in-house review of project work on a routine basis, supervise staff,
QA/QC conduct project cost control and project invoicing.
Task 1.5 Complete at 90- percent project completion an in-house discipline-by-
Coordination Check discipline coordination check of contract documents .
Task 1.6 No meetings are included in this fee proposal.
Council Meeting
Task 1.7 If required, assist City in preparation of technical documentation,
Permit Support correspondence and communication with RWQCB in processing an
Amended Wastewater Discharge.
U1
acupC UJ YYUIn.
Task 2.0 Stage 1 Final Design Project Manual (Drawin a pecifications}
Design, for construction by others, Stage 1 facilities recommended in the
May 1997 Preliminary Design Report and approved by the City. Detailed
design will include design of the following facilities/structures:
4
• "3;- New Floating Aerators
• Effluent Distribution Pipeline
• Percolation Pond Excavation
• Administration Building
• Sludge Dredging System
• Reuse Well
• Sludge Drying Beds (1 through 4)
• Provisions for future landscaping water services and landscape
electrical services
The design of these facilities will includc general/civil, process,
architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, and instrumentation
disciplines. The City will provide generic contract documents in Word
Perfect 6.1. The detailed design does not include: landscaping design.
Task 2.1 Prepare for inclusion in the contract documents, drawings and specifications
GeneraUCivil for general design elements. General design includes preparation of location
Design and vicinity map, index of drawings, and project referencing system and
symbols and abbreviations. Civil design will include site layout, horizontal
survey control data, paving and grading, drainage, and outside
interconnecting piping.
Task 2.2 Prepare, for inclusion in the contract documents, process and
Process and instrumentation diagrams (P&ID's). P&ID's show system layouts and the
Instrumentation relationship of systems and subsystems to one another. The diagrams show
.Diagram Design process pipe, mechanical equipment, equipment controls, interlocks, and
design criteria.
Task 2.3 Prepare for inclusion in the contract documents, drawings and specifications
Architectural Design for architectural design elements. Architectural design includes building
exterior elevations; floor, ceiling and roof plans and sections; and material
selections.
Task 2.4 - Prepare for inclusion in the contract documents, drawings and specifications
Mechanical Design for mechanical design elements. Mechanical design includes selection of
mechanical equipment, arrangement of equipment and piping.
U
2
i
Task 2.5 Prepare for inclusion in the contract documents, drawings and
Structural Design specifications for structural design elements. Structural design includes
design of process structures, buildings, foundations, piping supports,
handrails, and structures.
Task 2.6 Prepare for inclusion in the contract documents, drawings and
Electrical Design specifications for electrical design elements. Electrical design includes
service analysis of power utility service, power requirements, electrical
distribution systems, motor control centers, lighting and circuit diagrams,
and electric motors and switchgear.
Task 2.7 Prepare for inclusion in the contract documents, drawings and
Instrumentation Design specifications for instrumentation design elements. Instrumentation design
will include an evaluation of specific control systems for various processes
and systems specified. Control panels will be designed, control systems
configured and display components selected.
Task 2.8 Submit six copies each to the City of 40, and 85 percent contract
Design Submittals documents.
Task 2.9 Submit to the City four sets of half size drawings, and four sets of contract
Final Contract specifications, four sets of full-size drawings, and one set of originals for
Documents reproduction by City for bidding purposes. All plans submitted will be
prepared on plan sheets with the City's Standard title block. Full size
sheets will be 24-inches by 36-inches. Project specifications will be in CSI
format.
Task 3.0 Geotechnical Services
Task 3.1 Complete additional geotechnical investigations that may be required to
Geotechnical site the administration building, sludge drying beds, percolation ponds,
Services and reuse well at the proposed plant site. Drill two boring, complete
subsurface percolation pond exploration, prepare reuse well drilling
specifications and test well, and prepare a geotechnical report
documenting findings. The percolation pond boring will determine if there
is adequate separation exists between the bottom of the excavated
percolation ponds and the groundwater. The geotechnical report will
include all the data necessary for the design of the proposed facilities, such
as the following including; Groundwater conditions, soil compressibility,
shear strength, moisture content, grain size, expansion potential,
settlement potential, and soil compaction characteristics, foundation
bearing capacity, lateral pressures and remedial grading and drainage,
geologic and seismic hazards including liquefaction potential. This task
will be performed by Fugro West, Inc.'s office located in San Luis Obispo,
California.
..J
3
"",.1,.. J ..v1 n
Task 3.2 Complete site aerial control survey, aerial topographic mapping, and
Survey Services detailed topographic survey to establish survey control and existing
topography for new facilities. This work will be completed by Engineering
Development Associates, a subcontractor.
Task 4.0 Construction Cost Estimates
Task 4.1 Upon 40 percent project completion prepare construction cost estimate.
Prepare 40-Percent
Construction
Estimate
Task 4.2 Prepare final construction cost estimate that updates construction estimate
Prepare Final prepared for 40 percent completion level of design.
Construction
Estimate
4
IL $ —
0 � $
0
O U _ c\i
S S
a M
N
69
O O
C
E (D
co
Q
i
ro
0
CD
Cli
Cl) N
f—
N
O
CL L
m
Q, c o0i
CL
.°' �a
Z) CY)
� o
M �
a)
oro = _ p (n
CD in �r co co Un
'm r E
CD 73
i Q
Q C O cN
O m p 2 N N N ao � co co N O cD (D v N �f c
E S co N cr) N N N N N N N QOj d
m
U m ro F-
t— E
L a
m
C', y N N N co O (D CD O co c0 N c0 CO O O O
r
m ,Q `OIL
r r r r r r
UJ L
ro
ro L L
t!! O ro
Q1 r N
S y 0
0 y C C
CD m
o = m c E E
0.2
:9 r N (o a °zs � ro m m
o o .o o c°' .� ao 5 E = =
io ro ay i5 y � Z ti 0 ^ � � � QQ
> > > E �' E a� � E � yyh (. 9 (a X22 = c
rom om Q a
� — rouc u me(n m C: —
12cu TE T
p LU cn 8 �
C y E E E T Q E U .E m p .a _ .o o ` an d 0.
L m >, >, T m > — _
aocncncnQcn = I aQ (D 0 CDwm c -6 -0 - �
L O L N Cl) Cn � UJ (n &5 &5
O C m N N
3N
E- C Z
CL
0 0 N 7�
0 U
n
Ln
N C
O •- O
�. V
O
C Co
E
W
co
o L
S
N
Ln
(D
O �
CL O
N
m
(SII
D) En c4
a•-
Z) H
— O
m �
p ro f co O u-)
CD U)
'o E
ch a En i Q m
(n C m
`p E 0 = L CT Cr N C7 N N N N — co
cII m
U m M F-
H E
co � T � N � � ; � 'T �' (D r � C-1) �
N N
0 p N r
y n.
co
6 j
O
.a
N
C Ln
O
06
O !A (A N r
•� m •�
D Lo y C T
C a _
C •N i CD y m C Q m Cff Q r-
cu 0 C C C
m 'CC Q � (C4 U) co m c
m c� p m C .� C C�a. (n C U
a C � C p CL C -0 0 O
d 0I lia_ CDCL0C C/) Qa_ 22 CLdIn a
O C a
3
Fro 0 z
`k / . ® \
g - �
r
7 \ g
/ � It �
/
= o
E
E2 <
3
f k
w ®
0
/ &
q
/ o
0-CD
/
— c
0
L = 2 ®
� cis� .5 2 #
— 5 _ 0 - \
Jf I / � � � � � 7 C\j f C\j C\j c 2 % i — — # � � \ CLz
.2:,2J m
@ m
0 / / w
/ w _
27 / - - - - - CCcC7 X222 C) \ UR
\ 3 o 0
k
\ k
. o k /
U)
/ \ .
.. 2 £
_§ R § s9 \o
Wn2 # a
CL
ƒ \ fk7 ? gig 0 £ ` ®
3c - � 3 § � � —f \ k2 $ 2kk � 0
/ 2 J f f \ 2 / / CO CD -!2 ZZ
2 c a $ 7 � @ §
m a m m = c = _ > 0 n. 0 _
3 \ / OCO ƒ ƒ% § \cc _ .\ - 2 _ ± c 2§ _kk
D
c — � o >, m m m7v- « § § s a m O 0 mO O _ cz = Q 2
_
\ / / / \ \ _\ § § § \/ E =
2 a a'' \ 2 . _ . _ 0 — ^ m
CD w » y » a \ \ \ \ / 2 R \ E / 0 \ \ \ \ \ \
G oR@gR f � mggq mLLII IE 3323232
Ln
\ �/ w
k C14
/ R /
a5�
vi 3 § o)
U v
Do o_
O U
rn
co
o e
7E v o
0
0
C N
N Q
m
O O
d �
L �
O
o C
CL N
m
Ln
CIICA
Cr cm _6 r-
a._ 0 m
CD p
7t-
'n co
iL c r
CZ m
vn Q `n
cz a `.q v
Q m ►. = c0 0 to CO co NN fD 'f' (D CO (D 'ITco m
•- .- '-co( D to
oEo .-
U m m
F-
F- E
CD N
cz UJ ^ N N c0 T (D to CO (D co N c0 (D N N CV N T CO CO N
y co T O O
m O OL .— co
U
m
L
o
U)
c c �
0 0Z6 t
(D N CO
c m E r3) y c 3 y y y m
CD W m � 5 b o m m m Ec: 2_,
a N
d m c v>a c ro o' c a� c v, c $ o is CO (ap o c c
mom — m m ro m — � cpm m m .5
° U m •°
m
cn ,
co
m CO 0) L0E .N En iEn vE� uE� Fn c)
0ooJi c _j
a ooca o g � o gaanCL a_ :3CL VCLcaCL
0
N
O C D
3
E
F- 0Z
d �
8 S 8 c
v3 r r r z3 88 �8pp 888 v
Q Q 6 60933 69 69 69
U �
r
LO
Q
tQ t] N N C C
pppp _ CQ CA CA C
H 69 69 669 69
N
69.
p co CO QOi
C p
� co
0 Q
c4
QO O O O O
L r
r �
_ co
N COO O O
Cl r� 8 o
Oi O N n
a. N
m
cc LO CD co p Ln
CE. (7 N N RO Cr cC CA
Z) N
_ r �
CD
O C pLO v � cow v vi v v � 6w
m ii c
CD
co 5
p a
psi 0 � 0 = L 00CO00 0
00 000 ® d
�6 m 8
U E
a
y
W cn O IT 'T CO cn co
3 ^ r CA N N r r r r (p
y w r
m U o r
o a•
CE
ca
o o o o r
o n.
U I U U) C �cc
E E °
w w N C13 E
c G s m
oU -Er
o cu CD > Z
Q a, U) c
c y O O y m 'D (n m m ca U)
Cl 2 2 U Z `� rc � )
N Cp C
Cl) m CD > U � $ E
G U iII �2 a m i:-- o U a
c w c c •� _ cca o m w c a I-
CL s � m 0
oZ w w CD FL
4' "a-= `m > �vmcuro
CD C) 0pcp c c
CJ (= rn F- 0cAc� nm � cnQu> Qo
N r (V
O CCD
Cl) C
3
F- O Z
tiRO
fAX ME1�IpRAMWM ._.
Fugro West,ine.
1012 Pacific Stye Ce�omta 83401
iteA
San Luis Otiupo,
Tel. (g05) 542-0797 • Fax (605)542-9311
to Stone Date: Tuesday, July 22, 1997
To: 8� 7-92-7440
C ( Project No. 9
page 1 of.
Fax No. 255-7106
Fotlaw via mail: ❑Yes ® No
From: Jonathan D.Blanchard
r
SuNect: Atascadero WAP Copies.
Enclosures: Plate 1 -Fee Estimate Summary
Fee Schedule(1/97) servweS for the Stage 1
prepared as our proposal to provide geotechduW as a bass for
This fax was p Wastewater Treatment. This proposal was Prepare
pgrade Project for the • • • budding and s}u4e
I3 pf O� services for the design of the 60�-Enol�gk
Fugro to provide geotechnical engineer
on��g will be an approximately ` '
drying bed.We understand that e:with 2-to Moot high Pcrk=ta
is
story building. The sludge drying bed� e��on grade
below. Our fee estiz�u
and a pole-barn type coves building.
=opc of
attached
s , To iratiate the projoet, we request that updated
Task 1 -Project Initiation and Data Review. site be provided to us. We will then
project pians or other Pertinent information available for the
• Obtain San Luis Obispo County via Permits for one boring in excess of 25 feet deep;
• Visit the site to mark the Proposed exploration locatims;and
Sem Alert (USA) to review the boring locations relative to underground
Contact Underground a to, or injury resorting from busied
utilities. Fugro will not be responsible for location o damage marked'at the sift.
suuctures or underground utUes that are not brought to our attention and propcY
ubsarfsee F-*oration. We will excavate and log two drillholes. A s>unma'y of the
Task Z . S on the planned borings follows: -
locations and depths
; "' 1 boring to 54 feet
AdminbAratM Dullding
1 boring to 20 feet
Drift soft
2 borings toteiing 70 feet
TOTALS:
win be drilled using a truck mounted rig equipped for hollow-sun-auger drilling The lay
depth
The borings depth or well cued layers
of the borings
may be tiimted if the formation is encountered ai a shallo les for field classification and to
result in refusal to drilling. The borings will be used to obtain camp
n440FAXD
FAX MEMORANDUM pR -
fugro West,Inc.
1012 Pacific Street,Suite A
San Luis Obispo, California 93401
Tel. (805) 542-0797 0 Fax. (805)542-9311
evaluate some of the geotechnical properties of the soil encored using blow-counis obtained from
drive penetration tests. We propose that the borings be sampled at approximately 5-foot intervals with
either standard penetration split spoon, or modified California samplers, and by taking cuttings retrieved
from the auger fligbts. Samples from the field exploration program will be recovered for subsequent
laboratory testing. The borings will be backfilled with the excavated materials. Cutting left:from the drilling
will be spread out and left on-site.
Hazardous Materials and Buried Utilities. Specifically excluded from our scope of services is the search
for, and evaluation of, hazardmn materials. In the event that hazardous materials are encountered during
exploration, we will be required to follow protocols as governed by local and state agwxu& Work
performed in association with the discovery of contaminated conditions will be performed.on-a time-and-
expense basis according to Fee Schedule rates, the cost for which is not provided for in this proposal.
Task 3 - Laboratory Testing. Upon completion of the exploration program and after review of
field data, we will perform laboratory tests on selected samples obtained from the borings.for one of the
site investigated. The testa will help to classify and characterize the soils wed The types and
' numbers of laboratory tests that we tentatively expect to perform may include, but are not limited to:
moisture and density relationships, grain size distribution, strength tests, compaction, and plasticity. The
tentative numbers of tests are shown on Platt 1. The actual types and members of laboratory tests will be
based upon the conditions encountered during exploration.
Task 4 - Geotechnical Evaluation and ReportyR a Rsites investigated will be evaluated
for design. On the basis of the above tasks, we will provide geotechnical opinions and recommendations
regarding the following.
• Soil and ground water conditions encountered;
• Site preparation and grading for building areas;
• Suitability of the sail sacountered for use as compacted fill;
• Site coefficient for use with the California Code of Regulation(UBC)seismic design critc,*.
• Preliminary liquefaction potential of the soil encountered based on a qualitative raview of field
and laboratory data;
• Wbether additional field exploration, laboratory testing or analysis is needed to assess the
potential for liquefaction;
• Shallow foundation design(bearing capacity, settlement, embedment depths);
• Resistance to lateral loads(frictional and passive values
• Active and at-rest pressures for retaining structures; and
• Site drainage considerations.
-2 -
8/4/97
j .
v
. .nne+ ri .. t rnr 9a.r rnn rnir a.n_nn_ rr"t
FAX MEMORANDUM �, a lm
Fugro West,Inc.
1012 Pacific Street, Suits A
San Luka Obispo, Caitfomis 93401
Tel. (805) 542-0797 0 Fax (805)542-9311
We may recommend additional evaluation items if the geotechnical conditions revealed by our
field exploration differ from those assumed to prepare this proposal.
We will prepare a geotechnical engineamg report that presents the findings, conclusions, and
recommendations of the study. Included within the report will be a boring location plan, drill hole logs,
and laboratory test results. Faun copies of the report will be provided.
FSTMATED COSTS
We will provide geotechnical engneering services on a time and expense basis, in accordance with
Fee Schedule Rates. A copy of out current Fee Schedule (January 1997) is attached.. A summary of the
estimated hours and fees to provide the scope of services is presented on the attached Plates 1 - Fee
Estimate Summary. We understand that the estimated total fee should not be exceeded without prior
written authorization from the client.
SCHED=
We expect that we can initiate the services as described above within 1 week of receiving written
authorization to proceed. We expect that field work can coke within one week after that. Field
activities will be scheduled according to site access conditions, the prevailing weather boas, and the
availability of subcontractors. Schedules for permits may vary depending on the schedule of the agency
granting the permits. We expect that the report can be submitted within 6 weeks after the completion of
field work. We can provide recommendations to the design team as information becomes available.
Please call if you have any questions or require additional information.
-3 -
8/4/47
1
t
pm)oa tW 97-02-7440
Brown and Caidwe�
1<
Taal EstlnMled Fse
TO* per Taatr
Task d "0"'
Isf/+turiar.+wc 1�0 f116 sloo iso sao
,...••""�`"..'�" 8 $880
t. coor�nceon and t11l1tes[ 2 6
2 Fold EvioraieoeL
va
2 10 12 $980
3.l.at+at>Itorp Teailry
Unit Pncee per FOG Sel,edula(sa+baa*) $1,010
t.Geoleef+tdCal EvaMaaOan and RePott 2
B 18 4 4 M+
2 TTt 2 32T7 4 4 54 $5.330
TGTALS:
Ung NO. 8m +4 Copts
r
tY axpMassT
Oucslde E)PWW— Coat tlnie F�
"Rig Yobi:inoa(Pr bow 3115 t 1`Tb s
Wt d at 520 sscn HsA Dd*q 0-�") 3135 4 1.13 SS21-
0 L1rt�ia at$s0 asrlr Gr=A amd DOWN(P-sac" p 4.15 �
natlw�a at$70 erelt 6vopoA vowob ow dah s" 1 1 373
ian at 3300 earln�o=WwRaBpins(pw 861'1 0tndau at 3120 sari 1P+MM and Crays 0*(Dr dM 0 1.15
i N� ;100 arkemrma�eta►Ca d P3KM 0 1nl(Gtn at 3�M eeeh: mAW Phomwwb RAPM&Mfi— 0t s0
prossbn at 370 sael,: pyre and Rwo&cd- 0 1 $0
S1wr at 3200 eeett 2 s100 1 1 s1D0
R-vakA at 3220 eum Gager wee Pomiul ondq� 1 1.15 364
CornpecWn Come at:140 each: 1
Co Tashtr at 3120 each:
Sand E4L&W nt at 370 gear
mru ua EWOOMI31,OTC S�r 4
ESTIMATED TOTAL FEE! 58,719
aawc
,�+
mow 0%
s dWdTOW ra 0%
co
FEL ESTIMATE-GEOTECHNICAL
WastewaW Treatrncnt Plant Stage 1 UPgrade PLATE 1
Ains=defo,Caftmia -
J .l , ♦ n n �1 i'r• r n n n 'a • i n ri n r
GRO
a.®.�.s
FUGRO WEST, INC.
1012 Pacific Street,Suite A
San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
October 3, 1997 Tel:(805)542-0797
Project No. 97-92-7440 Fax:(805)542-9311
Brown and Caldwell
16735 Von Karman
Irvine, California 92606-4953
Attention:Ms. Marguerita Stone
Subject: Proposal for Additional Geotechnical Engineering Services, Atascadero Wastewater
Treatment Plant, Stage I Upgrade, Atascadero, California
Dear Ms. Stone:
Fugro submitted a faxed proposal, dated July 22, 1997, to provide geotechnical
engineering services to Brown and Caldwell for the Stage 1 Upgrade to the Atascadero
Wastewater Treatment Plant. Our services outlined in that proposal were to provide geotechnical
engineering services for the design of the administration building and drying beds. We understand
that the City of Atascadero has requested that we expand our scope of services to include drilling
an additional boring in the new percolation pond area, and to design a water reuse well for the
facility. Our proposed scope of work to provide the additional services requested is summarized
below. A summary of our fee estimate for the overall project, and by task is attached.
PERCOLATION POND AREA
Our scope of services for the percolation pond area is summarized below.
Task 1 - Subsurface Exploration. We will excavate one drill hole in the area of the
proposed percolation ponds. The purpose of the boring will be to record the depth to ground
water in the percolation pond area, and to characterize the soil conditions in this area. Fort e
purposes of preparing this proposal, we have assumed that ground water will be encountered at
depths of less than 50 feet below the existing ground surface,
h to 1te with
10-foot
truck-mounted equipment will be provided to us. The doll hole will be sampled aS
intervals according to procedures outlined in our previous proposal. In the event that the drill hole
rovide
needs to be drilled to depths in excess of 50 feet to encounter ground watercheduletlrates
the
additional drilling -services on a time and expense basis according to our fee s
cost for which is not provided for in this proposal.
Task 2 - Laboratory Testing. We will provide limited laboratory testing to assist in
characterizing the soil conditions in the percolation pond area. The types of tests we expect to
ter content, soil unit weight, and grain size distribution.
perform are for wa
1
D:WCUMENT.SV 1 BT97927"0'AW w%n440ADD.DOC
J A member of the Fugro group of companies with offices throughout the world
October 3,
Project No. 97-92-7440
Task 3 - Evaluation and Report. We will summarize the data collected from the
additional boring and tests, and incorporate the additional information into our report.
WATER REUSE WELL
Fugro personnel have worked with virtually every drilling contractor in Santa Barbara,
San Luis Obispo, Ventura, and Kern counties. We are familiar with the hyrdrogeologic conditions
along the Salinas River and will be able to quickly identify the contractors that have the required
personnel, equipment, and expertise to complete the well. Our proposed scope of services for the
water reuse well follows:
Task 1 - Project Initiation and Data Review. We will review available geologic and
hydrogeologic reports and data, and confer with the City and Brown and Caldwell to select a drill
site for the well, and prepare estimated project costs. We will recommend a preliminary well
diameter, casing material, and expected well production capacity. A preliminary cost estimate will
be prepared as part of this task which can be used for budgetary planning purposes.
Task 2 - Prepare Technical Drilling Specifications. We will prepare the technical
portions of the specifications and bid documents for the water reuse well. We will prepare an
itemized bid form for uniform bidding, provide a review of contractor bid submittals and provide
recommendations for contract approval: The specifications will provide guidance for the location,
timing of construction, and type of well to be constructed; including well sizing, screening type
and intervals, construction materials, drilling and development methods, drilling fluid disposal
requirements, and completion (construction) details. We will work with the City staff and Brown
and Caldwell in reviewing the bids and evaluating that the contractor meets necessary
requirements.
Task 3 - Drill and Construct Well. During test hole drilling, we will observe and
collect samples of the borehole cuttings, prepare a lithologic log of the soil and rock materials
encountered, provide monitoring of the drilling mud properties, and, in conjunction with the
driller, develop a record of the drilling operations.
Following the initial drilling, the test hole will be developed into the completed well. We
will provide a design and observe the completion of the well construction and development. On
the basis of the results of the test hole drilling, a final well construction design will be prepared
and presented to the drilling contractor to follow during well construction. The well construction
design will provide specific information on well construction details, including the diameter and
depth of the borehole to be drilled, the material type, diameter, and screened interval of the casing
and screen to be installed, the gravel pack gradation specifications, surface sanitary seal
specifications, well development procedures, and pumping tests specifications. We will then
monitor the construction and development of the production well. The test hole will be reamed
0:1DocuMENT.5117 WM7gV440.AWMT7"OAM-DOC
—��� - 2 -
"as Beam
October 3, ,
Project No. 97-92-7440
out to the desired final diameter, the casing and well screen installed, the gravel pack installed,
and a surface seal placed to the recommended depth. The well will then be developed to remove
drilling fluid from the gravel pack and formation using biodegradable chemical treatment, surging,
jetting, intermittent pumping, and/or other appropriate techniques.
Task 4 - Observe Aquifer Pumping Tests. We will observe the pump testing of the
well and analyze test data. The tests will probably consist of a 6- to 10-hour step-drawdown
pumping test, a 24-hour(minimum) constant discharge test, and a 4- to 8-hour recovery test. The
drilling contractor will provide the necessary equipment and manpower to conduct the tests; the
water level in the pumping well will be monitored throughout the pumping tests by means of a
computerized data logger and pressure transducers supplied by Fugro.
Task 5 - Prepare Letter Report. We will summarize the project results in a letter
report, including conclusions for the long term production capability of the well and optimum
pumping rates. The work performed during construction, development, and testing of the well
will be documented in the summary report, which will also provide conclusions and
recommendations for the long-term production capability of the well. Specific recommendations
will be provided for permanent pump size, control and power requirements, optimum pumping
M
rates, and operational pumping schedule.
We trust this letter meets your needs at this time. If you have questions please contact the
undersigned.
Sincerely,
FUGRO WEST, INC.
onathan D. Blanchard, P.E.
Project Engineer
Copies: 1 - Addressee
i
i
S
4
0,.\DOCUMENT.Sv7Ml92744o,/W VA 7ssoAM.DOC
—g�� -3 -
i�AX MEMORANDUM
Fugro Wast, Inc. -
1012 Paeific Street, Suite A
San Luis Obispo,California 93401
Tei. (805)542-0797 ' Fax (505)542-9311 ;
To- Azhar Malik Date. Tuesday, October 07, 1997
Brown and Caldwell Project No. 97-92-7440
Fax No. 714.474-0940 Page 1 of 1
From: Jonathan D. Blanchard Follow via ma I: ❑ Yes No
Subject: Atascadera WWTP Upgrade mss:
Marguerite.asked me to forward to yw some of our client ref for this project. Also, are will prepare
a letter proposal for our original scope of work that was faxed 1.0 ou. -
BUdIffiss
fiendenronWhsle Rech Pipeline Vui 'bittty Assessment, City of San Luis
an Luis Obispo Obispo WastewmW Tr t Plant Expansion. City of Sen LUIS
Department Obispo Water Rune Prof
955 Morro Street
San Luis Obispo, Callbmia 93403
TeL(805)781-7215
Mr.George GibsonNacimierto Water Supply I Ira ed,Loa Osos Wastewater.Project
County of San Luis Obispo
County Govemmsnt Center, Room 207
Sen Luis Obispo,Califomia 93408
Tel_ (805)731-4489
Mr. Stephen J. Sylvester Cambria Comrrwnity Sw ic4a Oistr)ct Desallnatlon Facility, Twin
North Coast Engin"irng Bridges Replacement Prq :
725 Creston Road,Suite 9
Paso Robles, Caiifomia 83448
' Tel. (805) 2393127
I
s Please call if you have questions or require additional informs ai.
' .•."._... .. • 1 ... ..-....n.. , ♦ n n -i i r r n n T � !1 T •I n_A T_ 1 f^f
Project No.97-92-7440 13R0
Brawn and Caldwell
n
O 9 N
o , o z y Total Estimated Fee
D M Task
Task a $ ours Per Task
Q U O C
1"7 F"swan RrtMmow.. $130 $115 $100 sw $80 $70 S55 SW $40
1.Oeotacnnlcal lnvesdyation
1. Coordination and Utilities: 2 6
8 $660
2. Field Exploration: 2 10 12 $980
3. Laboratory Testing: Unit Prices per Fee Schedule(see below) $1,010
4. Geotechnical Evaluation and Report 2 8 16 4 4 34 $2,680
TOTALS: 2 12 1 32 4 4:1 1 54 $5,330
LaboratoryExpenses No. Outside Expenses Unit No. Billing Costs
Cost Units Factor
Moisture Unit Weight at$20 each: 10 Drill Rig Mobilb2tion(per hour) $115 4 1.15 $529
Atterberg Limits at$80 each: 1 HSA Drilling(per hour) $135 4 1.15 $621
Seive Analysis at$70 each: 1 Grout and Bentonite(per sack) 0 1.15 $0
Consolidation at$300 each: support Vehicle(per day) $75 1 1 $75
Expansion Index at$120 each: 1 Traffic Closure/Flagging(per day) 0 1.15 so
Triaxial(UU)at$100 each: Traffic Signing and Cones only(per day) 0 1.15 $0
Triaxial(CU)at$300 each: Field Expenses(ConeretafCold Patch) 0 1 $0
Une.Compression at$70 each: Aerial Photograph Reproductions 0 1 $0
' Direct Shear at$200 each: 2 Plans and Reproduction 0 1 so
R-value at$220 each: Fax/Postage/OvernigM $100 1 1 $100
Compaction Curve at$140 each: 1 County Well Pemrits(each) $56 1 1.15 $64
Corrosively at$120 each:
Sand Equivalent at S70 each:
TOTAL LAS ExPENSEs: $1,010
$1,389
PtrcanageR, BASIC: $6,719
Annual Ratehcrease: 0% PERCOLATION-POND: $2,881
IndiredRate: 0% WATER REUSE WELL: $8,640
Car&gwxy AVow to Eaonowd Tom Fec 0%
MULnPUM 1.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL ALL TASKS): $18y240
FEE ESTIMATE-GEOTECHNICAL-BASIC
Wastewater Treatment Plant Stage 1 Upgrade
„� Atascadero, California PLATE 1
Project o. - -
Brown and Caldwell
ABU
m
c
Task is a a -a Ta�slr Estimated Fee
-a. to a N t Hours per Task
1"7 FM scar RalwWoar. $130 $115 $100 $90 S80 $70 $55 . $50 $40
2 percolation Pond Drilling
1. Feld Exploration: 6 6 $480
2- Laboratory Testing: Unit Prices per Fee Schedule(see below) $720
3. Geotechnical Evahration and Report 4 4 2 1 11 $840
TOTALS: 0 0 1 0 1 4 1 10 1 0 2 1 0 17 $2,040
Laboratory Expenses No. Outside Expenses Unit No. Billing Costs
Cost Units Factor
Moisture Unit Weight at$20 each: 6 Drill Rig(dobil'tatior(per hour) $115 0 1.15 $0
Atterberg Limits at$80 each: HSA Drilling(per hour) $135 5 1.15 $776
Seive Analysis at$70 each: 2 Grout and Bentonite(per sack) 0 1.15 so
Consolidation at$300 each: Support Vehicie(per day) 1 1 s0
Expansion Index at$120 each: Traft Closurimflagging(per day) 0 1.15 s0
Triaxial(U U)at$100 each: Traffic Signing and Cones only(per day) 0 1.15 so
Triaxial(CU)at$300 each: Field Expenses(Concrelelcold Patch) 0 1 s0
Unc.Compression at$70 each: Aerial Photograph Reproductions 0 1 so
Direct Shear at$200 each: Ptans and Reproduction 0 1 $0
R-value at$220 each: Fight 1 1 s0
Compaction Curve at$140 each: County weu Permits(each) $56 1 1.15 $64
Falling Head Penn.at$230 each: 2
Sand Equivalent at$70 each:
TOTAL Las DMIDIS:s: $720
$841
PercentageRatim ESTIMATED TOTAL FEE: $2,881
Annual Rate Increase: 0%
Ind"uea Rata: 0%
Corfu ryAj to Es&rW*d ToniF*w 0%
MULTIPLIER: 1.00
FEE ESTIMATE -GEOTECHNICAL-PERCOLATION PONDS
Wastewater Treatment Plant Stage 1 Upgrade
VX3 Atascadero, California PLATE 2
i -
Project No.97-92-7440
Brown and Caldwell �'aR0
m m a Total
Task g 8 2 o -2a` Task Estimated Fee
a a Hours Per Task
1"7 FM sear RMWHO r: $130 $115 $100 SW $80 $70 255 250 $40
3.Water Reuse Well
1. Project Initiation and Data Review: 8 2 10 $880
2 Prepare Technical Specifications: 2 12 2 4 20 $1,820
3. Drill and Construct Wei: 16 16 $1,600
4. Observe Auifer Pumping Tests: 16 4 20 $1,920
5. Prepare Letter Report 2 8 4 4 4 22 $1,640
TOTALS: 4 0 1 60 0 6 1 0 t 4 8 6 88 $7,860
Laboratory Expenses No. Outside Expenses Unit No. Billing Costs
Cost Units Factor
Moisture Unit Weight at$20 each: Drill Rig Mobilization(per hour) $115 0 1.15 s0
Atterberg Limits at$80 each: HSA Drilling(per hour) $135 0 1.15 $0
Seive Analysis at$70 each: Grout and Bentonite(per sack) 0 1.15 s0
Consolidation at$300 each: Support Vehicle(per day) $75 2 1 $150
Expansion Index at$120 each: Hermit 1000C and Transducer (per day) $135 3 1.15 $466
Triaxial(UU)at$100 each: Traffic Signing and Canes only(per day) 0 1.15 $0
Triaxial(CU)at$300 each: Field Expenses(ConcretalCotd Patch) 0 1 $0
Unc.Compression at$70 each: -Aerial Photograph Reproductions 0 1 $0
Direct Shear.at$200 each: Pians and Reproduction 0 1 s0
R-value at$220 each: Fax/PostagdOvernight $100 1 1 $100
Compaction Curve at$140 each: County Wen Permits(each) $56 1 1.15 $64
Corrosivity at$120 each:
Sand Equivalent at$70 each:
TOTAL LAS SU ENSEB SO
_ $780
Petty„tags Ratex ESTIMATED TOTAL FEE: $8,640
Annual Rate kxxease: 0%
Indirect Rats: 0%
Contkgrrrcy AppW to EAWndW Tout F. 0%
MULTIPLIEPt 1.00
3
FEE ESTIMATE—GEOTECHNICAL-WATER REUSE WELL
Wastewater Treatment Plant Stage 1 Upgrade
Atascadero, California PLATE 3
J W -
�f
OCT-03-97 IS- 19 FROM= I P 'NE I D= 7 1' '740940 PAGE 1.
. .:.. RDAMVROPMW
� ~
October,3, 1297
MwqAft skxw VIA FACSIN E:
Brown & Gaidwom (M) 474-MO
i$T85 Yon Karnwl, Suns 200
kvkA CA 9290849M
Rai proposd for Survepq Senrft w CRy of Africa"*wASUMSW T rsatnwt
Fac"4W&ft - 6rvwn & Caldwell # 9475
VMA Proposal me- 1120)
Thur*you for requesting a proposal from EDA for surveYkV S&Mcss necxsswl far ttM
LVWWD of tt WesWMW Treamwt Fsci ty in AUMcadero,CA- WO fes!asft m
l would bg ft appropriate method for :'napping a protect Of tris size.
Tha tooft" soCp6 of setVIM outlines ttv a c titges VM vv* provide, niocV YALi an
emoted fee fa MOft CSft po Y.
AERIAL.CONTROL SURVEY (.32 CODE)
9j aerial parials and pgtm*V
=traf stavey. TKm survey wig be.based on an offud roost, county and for sty
moncxnenss for tl o
now tha site. Ws w al toceted wdsilnp .
balls of bsarkig% hcwwnw, no boinlWYwM bo shown on *a
_ Sa mora noc tae .
For prv)ecta of*b type► k is often ad A to odent trio Pmpa on a stats plans
��a� �f� m
cooldr9de_ f"U g3 shown on your plans, it ural be neosssar� tie ow do C�Trans
is locet$d apprcxirna*tV ow MOO 80uth of the
PUM
option Fee: s eoo
!
PLANNING
CIVIL NGINEER IN
r E A N 0 S U R V E Y I N G
FAX tsot-549-6704
1320 NI AK OSY. ppSQUROBLl:S O:AA93401
93446 • 805-237-$033 FAX 805-237-3797
744 a
T
OCT-03-97 IS: 19 FROH: IRVINF ID: 7144740940 PAGE 2/7
• M��C�StO�
OotCgW $ 1987
Page 2
2- AERtAL TOPM"PHiC MAPPWQ (,32 CODF)
rg phaW of work wI! be wb-co racWd to Golden SLOW Ae&l���acd
((BUZ), San Luis Ob*x , C L Tris d P WN b8
Om (1) fva oontoum. Only meas wl'kh aro unobstructed by"0 wilt
show cor=w Mxnmllm GSAS wig read a mhnv n+of two(2)we"to ovros
wpograpft MORD. qOW Omw over the site may debry the f6^TThq product wit be avabbs In dqW tOMIK compere whh D•
Estisr� Fos; $4.200
g, DETAILED TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY(.31 CODE)
You may wish to have certain crftW iaatures 10' t Boas a Wcund
w rygy, 'Tris rttlgt>t lode lova kig the =rws of tt'1e
P r" and tow IWW% mss, vetoes and corwift
$fig, Tft ecope cf work couldbe doirW
fee rengt- • for bt�e�tirIg
Pur Oo j we are prov�d� Y� with
I Fm s 900' $1 law
SCHEDULE
we con set the sera panels and perkxm. tt>a sucv'ey within one (1) weak of a
. 384S con have t v tit.$OW Prodva reaciY wtth�:2'3 wed#ol0w+n9
OF Smw=AND COOAPENSATiON
' t# sen+ es described herekt,wid in sccorde6 with the ffr- ed
d p orn of AQrs•crM(12/15/94 r6VWM), to Pocated harelr+ ealsbk A.
f .a�CBuoR feee�
AddMortffi dent�ec�,charged at COSI,may lnduc* SigchstQes.
ovaTlig'tt �gvs and Dew rqxponabW and
and few ttammuY to work.
You w#s be bl3ted ft-o".
vvl�t b
due and Paye*upon your receipt of cur
' MV kwoice-
9 M proposal is a=Ptvi* u-4 ym sww%ith the tQrma and condom
ptom sign,
EN GINEERIUS DSvELOaMENT ASS 0CiAlE 49_8658 FAX 805.549-8704
t
1320 1iIP0M0 ST. • SAN LUIS WSPO: CA 93403 8C5_ �.
744 ()AK ST. ` PASO ROBLES. CA 93440 • 905-237-1039 • fAX 805-231-3797-
OCT-03-S7
1S:20 FROM: IRVTNE ID+714474 @94@ r.+.c a.
O=W 9, 1597
Pops
date and retum ttrs ohgVW to cu., ofoe. For Your oornenlenoe, we rwe used a
dup�cate origins! for }rout foes.
be alid forO days om ft d heremcW o. once again,
proposal. ft mom
'Thin pcopose�
tt you for requestlr,p a propvsai from EDA.
BEVE .OPMENT ASSOCIATES
pta
ACCEPTED
t t�itYi feed 00 ab*ve, and the S=d»d actt= A - Standard Proviskmm of
Apr09flfeAt(12/15 4fwli W), heMn by r etww Cgs and agm to thO
b[rrtf Ind C� Set!Orth In MIS propos&L
EDA
1r= -
Dots
BF�O�YN &CALDWELL
Bata
FM Sd*dL to
pAriff 06
ca G dden SM Aadel Savays, Inc.
ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES
-649-8704
3401 805-549- 658 FAX so5
1320 NIPOMO ST. , SAN LUIS OBISPO. CA 3448 805-237-1033 FAX 805-237-3797
i 744 OAK ST. : Pa$0- ROBLES. CA 9
I
EXHIBIT B
FEE PROPOSAL
ADDENDUM NO. 2
Consultant Services Agreement
Wastewater Treatment Facility
Stage 1 Upgrade Improvements
BROWN AND
C ^^ L D W i Vint Facsbnile Transmission
February 26, 1998
Mr.John Neil
Assistant City Engineer
City of Atascadaro
6500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero,California 93422 12-9583-03
subject Adde 6=No.2 to City of Atascadere
Waswwater Treatm=Facility
Stage 1 Upgrade—Fee Proposal
Dear W.Neil:
As requested, we agree to the following changes to our scope of wank identified in our Fee
Proposal of October 7, 1997,and Addendum of November 10, 1997:
• Delete addition of three aerators in the aerated Iagoon.
• Delete design of new water reuse well and geotechnical report related to reuse
well investigation.
Our revised:fee estimate based on the above changes is as follows:
End Labor and Expenses $217,430
Geotechnical Services
Sludge Drying Bods and Administration Building Report $ 6,700
Percolation Pond Xuvestigation and Report S 2,900
Surveying Services(Optional Task)
Aerial Control Survey $ 1,500
State Plane Coordinate System S 800
Aerial Topographic Mapping $ 4,200
- Detailed Topographic Survey $ 1,500
E*.*WffenWEngWe0,VAnd Conw hV•Ae*yVCv8�
0145 16735 vox KAAMAX, Si:m. 200, IRv)NY, CA 92714-4918
(714) 660.1070 Fax (714) 474.0440
FEB-26-199 15:10 P.02
� k,
Mr.John Neil
February 26, 1998
Page 2
Thank you very much for the opportunity to submit this revised engineexi ng services cost
es=atr-Please call me if you need fwrtber assistance.
Very traly yours,
BROWN AND CALDVVkL,
QKAA-�.I!
Azee MAU,P.E.
Project Manager
AM;jc
m
101415
FEB-26-1998 15:10 P•0„
•
EXHIBIT C
FEE PROPOSAL
ADDENDUM NO. 3
Consultant Services Agreement
Wastewater Treatment Facility
Stage 1 Upgrade Improvements
BROWN AND
C A L D W E L L
April 30, 1998
Mr. John Neil
Assistant City Engineer
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero, California 93422 12-9583-03
Subject: Addendum No. 3 to City of Atascadero
Wastewater Treatment Facility
Stage 1 Upgrade—Fee Proposal
Dear Mr. Neil:
As requested, we agree to the following changes to our scope of work identified in our Fee
Proposal of October 7, 1997, and Addendum of November 10, 1997:
• Deletion of three aerators in the aerated lagoon.
• Deletion of new water reuse well and geotechnical work related to reuse well.
• Deletion of Administration Building and geotechnical work related to the
building.
Our revised fee estimate based on the above changes is as follows:
Engineering Fee (Labor and Expenses) $142,650
Geotechnical Services
Sludge Drying Beds and
Percolation Pond Investigation Report $ 6,210
Surveying Services (Optional Task)
Aerial Control Survey $ 1,500
State Plane Coordination System $ 800
Aerial Topographic Mapping $ 4,200
Detailed Topographic Survey $ 1,500
Environmental Engineering And Consulting•Analytical Services ; 1
mAproposa1\9583-03\101488.docl 6 7 3 5 V o N K.A R M.I N. S U i TE 2 0 0, 1 R V I N E, C A 9 2 714.4 918 'I a l _ J 19% 3�'
(7 14) 660-1070 FAX (714) 474-0940
PUBLIC WORKS
S 1
r1TV r''.
Mr. John Neil
April 30, 1998
Page 2
Thank you very much for the opportunity to submit this revised engineering services cost
estimate. Please call me if you need further assistance.
Very truly yours,
BROWN AND CALDWELL
Azee Malik
Project Manager
AM:re
mAproposal\9583-03\I01488.doc
EXHIBIT D
FEE SCHEDULES
Consultant Services Agreement
Wastewater Treatment Facility
Stage 1 Upgrade Improvements
+ COMPENSATION RATE TABLE C R0.pwt� GQ`pw
Number Personnel Classification Code Rate
ENGINEERING
108 I Executive L $147 . 50
109 Executive Engineer L 147 . 50
110 Chief Engineer L 147 . 50
111 Managing Engineer K 132 . 80
112 Supervising Engineer J 122 . 00
113 Principal Engineer I 117 . 00
114 Senior Engineer H 102 . 30
115 Engineer G 88 . 50
116 Associate Engineer F 76 . 70
11.7 Assistant Engineer E 63 . 90
TECHNICAL
350 Chief Designer J $122 . 00
351 Supervising Designer I 117 . 00
352 Principal Designer H 102 . 30
353 Senior Designer G 88 . 50:
354 Designer r 76 . 70
355 Assistant Designer E 63 . 90
130 Managing Computer Drafting I 117 . 00
633 Supervisor Computer Drafting G 88 . 50
634 Lead Operator Computer Drafting F 76 . 70
635 Senior Operator Computer Drafting E 63 . 90
637 Operator Computer Drafting D 49 . 20
ADMINISTRATIVE
490 I Executive Secretary E $63 . 90
491 II Secretary D 49 . 20
492 I Secretary C 44 . 30
496 III Clerk C 44 . 30
494 II Clerk B 37 . 40
495 I Clerk A 31. 50
561 Manager Accounting G 88 . 50
562 III Accountant F 76 . 70
564 II Accountant E 63 . 90
565 I Accountant D 49 . 20
566 Senior Accounting Clerk D 49 . 20
670 - IV Word Processor E 63 . 90
671 III Word Processor D 49 . 20
672 II Word Processor C 44 . 30
673 I Word Processor B 37 . 40
EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 28 , 1996 TO DECEMBER 26, 1997
. j
own
FUGRO WEST, INC.
1012 Pada¢Sweet,Suits A
San Dula Obispo,CA 83491
Tat(am SCIA 7
FM(WS)$4'9311
FEE SCHEDULE
FOR CONSULTING SERVICES
PERSONNEL HOURLY RATE
Professional Staff
SeniorPrincipal.....................................................................................................5 180
Principal...............................................................................................................- 130
Assocists.....................................................................................................----_.._.. 115
Senior.................................................................................................................... 100
Projed.........................................................................................------...---------------.. 90
Staff............................................-..------------------------....------...................................... SO
Assistant.....................................................................................................:.......... 70
Senior Fold Technician/CADD-GIS Operator--------------------------------------------------------------------- 65
Field Technician/CADD-Gi5 Operator-----------------------------------
--------------------.._._.................... 60
TechnicalAssistant.....................................................................---........................._........ 55'
111ustrator....................................................................................................... .......... .... 55
GISTechnician................................................................................................................... 50
WordProcessor...................................................................................................... ...... 50
OfficeAssistant...................................................................................---......---..........-------- 40
Fees for expert witness preparation, testimony, court appearances, or
depositions will be billed at the rate of$200 per hour.
OTHER DIRECT CHARGES
Subcontracted SeMees---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cost.Pius.16%
Outside Reproduction.......................................................................................... Cost.Pius 15%
OutsideLaboratory. ............................._.......--------•------------ .....---...._................. Cost Plus-15%_
Out-of-Pocket Expenses ......................................................................................Cost Plus 159 -
Traveiand Subsistence....................................................................................:... Cast Plus 1S%
PickupTrucks and Vans.......... .......................................................................................S76,02y
Automobile Mleage (outside 50-mile radius)............................................................... $0.35/Mile
FIELD INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT(Sea Separate Schedule on Page 2)
GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY TESTING (See Separate Schedule on Page.3)
aw�r.00Rro�oroieov�.00* A rt1onZw of the Fugro group of companies vMh otncea throughout foe wood. January 1,997
cn_.i c, 6 n-ic -rivno r i cc Ptic crio ` o - i.,r- tin—on_) cci
Fee 8chedute
January 1997
FIELD INSTRUMENTATIONIEOUIPMENT FEE
Air Entrainment Gauge(ASTM C231) ....................................................... .$25/day
ch
Asphalt
Pat Probe ------------------•-----• ..........................................................................$141bucket
Inclin
and Readout Device........................................... ..._...............$1101day
Nuclear Gauge(CPN Model MC-3).....................
Kemlavel............... ......_.......__...... -- -- - ....-- -------------- ---------------- �
Downhole Soil Samplers (234-gnch California Ilner, SPT)............... - ._...----,$751day
..... . ...................
CPN Corp. Hydroprobe............................. ...$75/day
Double-Ring tn>�trometer.............................•---....._.._.......................--••----........__........... .
......................................................... ...........$75/day
FeldFitttef.................._............................................................................. .S25Junft
Positive Displacement Pump.---------•........ ......................
ISM Petistalttc Air Pump................................................................................................$25/day
Hermit 10000 and Transducer ........
................... .............$135/day
Transducer(in situ) ...................................................................... ...
.........:.......... :SS5/day
ay
HemUt 2000 and 2-Transducers ............................................................................... .S2S0/day
Conductivity Probe (in situ) ............... . ................................... ..... 35&day
.... .,.. ................
.............
5HP Submersible Pump(2 days) ...................... ........5323
.......................................................:..
5HP Submersible pump (additional days) ,--_-_.-
Water Sampling Pump(Well Wizard) .......................................................................
Submersible Test Pump(initial two days)............................ .. ....$325Jtest
SubmsrslblQ Tess Pump(each additional day)................_...........................................
....s55/day
Temperature-pH-Conductivity Meter................................................................................$25/day
Water Level Recorder.......................
..............................................................................520/daY
15HP Submersible pump(2 days)... .....................................
I 5HP Submersible Pump(additional days) ......................................................................." day
2-Inch Diameter water meter ........................................... ..........$20/day
4-inch Diameter water meter ..................................................
........................................
daY
Water Sampling Pump (Bladder Pump or Electric Submersible)......................... ... ..-5200lday
Well SailerStandard................ .
Well Hailer-Disos
paWa................................................ ................$25/day
................................................. each
Portable Phototonizatlon Detector(PID)............................................ .....$100/day
Portable Flame Ionization Detector(PID/FID)........................................................ $1 v0/day
Stainless Steel Hand Auger Sampler...................................... ..........$Mdey
..... .........
Brass or Stainless Steel Sample Sleeves............................... .......;1 Waach
Generator
Hnmer............................................ ............................................. ...
. ._.............. �
Rotary �
...........................................................$40iday
Fisher TW-6 Metal Detector..................................................................................
Charges for other specialized equipment and calibration gases
will be quoted on a project-specific basis.
_ 022 PAO� Y
nn n. n . - r+•�e+ `iiv�i� i� �.• • � nn� �ii'•� inn ria . Lr in nn �rnt
I
Fee Schedula
January 1897
LABORATORY AND FIELD SOIL TESTING FEES
CLASSIFICATION TESTS EARTH yyORK TESTS
Moixh"or WmW Cone"(ASTM D2216) i 5 Standard Proctor,3 port(ASTM DW___ S 1-
Plastic and Uquid Vantterg)Lkrrlde(ASTM D4314„ S 80 ModAed Proctor.3 pont(ASTM 01557,CALL 216).. S i 20
Sflelr*W Umt(ASTIA D427).—........„.—. S 80
SpwfAc Greg(ASTM 0854) $ 70 Check
r�o* ...—..._..._.._..„.
Et7ufvahant(ASTM D241 S 50
-----„- - ._ S 70
Orpanie Canlarrf(ASTM D2974)_..___—.._ S 60 R-halos(Aar TM D28"..---....-._--_..-_.•_-- — — S •220
Sakkey in Ffydrodriorlo Add(ASTM D24”—..._.... $ 40 CDR(One Port)(ASTM of DOM
—r •— S 2W
(ASTM D2499) ._—...._ S 50 Santpsvah Adrrtbdcse�...___--. --Add S s0
Rode Cawft�
4lSTM D2iM.—..-_--....--..... S 50
GRAIN-SIZE ANALYSES PERMEABILITY
Constant Mead(Ona C*Vdr*V Sbesi)ASTM 62434)S 230
Pe r+t (ASTM
ow( _.1140) —._ S. 70 Fs*V Fuad(Ona Confir”Stress) _ �
Pasairrg sZ00 Skiva(ASTM D1140)_._ S 40 TrW"Pertnsabcey in F%mble Wad Paenamnmiw vah
tlfrt
FfAnwy w ((ASTM D422)..._............. _ ... $ 00 BadW*W"Sabtsa6 (One e CorW Shear)
D422) —_—.—__. S 140 (ASTM W" _.. S 290
AdcftionW Carft"Sbess—_-._._Add Par Sbaas S 100
DENSITY MEASUREMENTS Coee�toe+edserr�resix>a�tge......._...„__.._.._.._.. i 90
TOW and Dry Dertsdes(*ft moNlesa eoetent) CYCLIC TESTS
(ASTM D2937I-- — .—_ S 20
Matdmsm and bltimum Den6ilks
(ASTM D4�,ASTM 04254)..--...—.— $ 180 Cyodo arbeimM(marc tS00 oydea) — ♦ 860
SMees•Cenehoided OYodO SintpM Shear
VOLUME CHANGE TESTS mx&mum 5000ydas_.—._---.— Stow
1Mh Sbesa 8A”-.-._....._r...__. dd S 100
r lncrwrmttal C4rm0ktmGM marc 12 Loads(161st marc) _ Rss�in-CWftiled��$11F06$h 5 shale„...:. S 060
With F-sml Rebound(ASTU 02435)—...-
2 35) _.— i 250 ��'3 COf&*V NaTM-04MS) S 060
Wth httetmedlob Rebound and Relood.. ....— i app- CONCRETE AND ASPHALT
Cakpse or Swell +rartett!_ .. .. .. — ..Add i 50
Lards 4terdnwa Beyond is tet;OL lnerartwrt.---- S 30, ew"*s CwWe"Jon Tears .__.... . .(ad of i 42
With Firm!Rebaa+d VWM iD4 to 321st nrmc Mold or Addbw W Ted..„_. ...... ._;. S 14
�)—...„ _. i 3W Cydrrdor Lloeda VAlh Lids.._----. ._, S 3
With Wsff dfats Repand and Reload___._ S 400 Mortar or Grout Cubs Caroession Tesb — S 18
Evamelon ktdec.._—. _— „ S 120 Nxabddy per Fradiort ,._,.. . _ S 100
Co”or swM------ —___.—_—. $ 60 Aspembe Cowefm htatdnrum Density( _.. i 100
Cenrpacted SW"chaps..._.._._ . Add S 80_. _ AsphaR Concr+Ms EtdrscSort 150
STATIC STRENGTH TESTS MISCELLANEOUS
Eland Pet,bender_...._._ _.__. i -3 Sail Che **y for Cmasion
Sch"ft wrisS b�rs Barts(ASTM --5- X-� S _--_ S 1:03
D4641�—.. „ „ .._ S 20 Tube Culdng, „CIA 20
T?wAw Uncorrlhsd CantpssaiM Sid(ASTM Ml 66) S 70 Remolded or Cempacbd SpecirtterL. _ .Add' ! !30
Triamal Urrcw*wd Compression,Rick
(ASTU D2MM_...__.......—.......__.-.-.—„......_.-.- S 100 PfeD°ratl°n of Spedd Teske,3pedrrxxl Admbttuse,
TrWxW Unoonr&b"d Und&hW(ASTM DWSM„._ 3 100 or Mand Trbrer*V per persorrrsi rates
TraueiW CineodAWad Drained
Sb�S�-- ----- --— = 350 NOTES.,
mum-stow..._........—.—.—._—..— S 650 1) Ratos for otrw eats and erft vublim a con be Marctshee an
Trtatdd ConaoMeyed Unarat”(wrpore preesum) ro*mxL
S#rgie SN90(ASTM DfM.._.._...__.._..._......_ 3 300 2) The howAre are k=kmdod W NO CHARGE. vimud
Trim" S e00 chwa l wow
m 1 cplh and vokmm.dwr4s jmes.
(recpae pressure) density w@b eY biow oomorwaim,
8irrgk�*Ae-•----------•
$ 800 Wnvb ahnr,--t t edam,and vd wm Chrb9s tats.
►Auttl-ses�e _.. ... .... „ . ._ ....„_,.....„ 41,600 3) eeuB►•ee+ve 7b VM beet corrins or 3 corininv wemuser-
D*ed Shear,341dnt Quids Teat„., .—......... S 160 4) Ruch am6W.nerAz roe faring unmah duled omthl woo
Direct Shrew,Mull-Stage(ASTM Dom)_-•—•...--.. $ 200 to a 256i a mchwgk
R"WuW Sbwiglh...__.__.. ..Add S S0 5) Toa*V for cw&�=AV&”(EPA Iwai C b D)vndl'be
Sknpte Shrasr..—.—_ — — S 45004vroiead at 1.3 tkv Wad n oc
Canpaetod SorngM Scrrharpe_..._...— . __.Ade s 60 6) 3wr-*andpnwtt or Gibe metsfde coeds d Cast+ISI
7) Panemd Mnia br dad wporeiV W Pw+Wd+W robes
8) R49W reprodudlon cods Par pwworrai raba
3 b+rc�eawa.onar�mr
— PAGE 3
I
n