HomeMy WebLinkAboutPRC_2008-02-21_AgendaPacketCITY OF A TA SCA DERO
PA RKS AND RECREA TION
COMMISSION
AGENDA
Thursday, February 21, 2008
7:00 P.M.
Regular Meeting
Atascadero City Hall Council Chambers
6907 EI Camino Real
Atascadero, California
REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
ROLL CALL:
Chairperson:
Vice -Chairperson:
Commissioner:
Commissioner-
Commissioner-
Commissioner:
ommissioner:Commissioner:Commissioner:
Commissioner:
Student Representative
Student Representative
Jay Sechrist
Barbie Butz
Daniel Chacon
Julie Dunn
Ann Hatch
Jonalee Istenes
Sorrel marks
Paige Buck -Moyer
Ryan Carden
COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to
address the Commission on any matter not on this agenda and over which the
Commission has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to five minutes. Please state your
name and address for the record before making your presentation. The Commission
may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. A
maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless changed by the
Commission.)
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION REORGANIZATION:
1. Commission Appointment of Chairperson — Nominations from the
Commission.
2. Commission Appointment of Vice -Chairperson — Nominations from the
Commission.
COMMISSION/ YOUTH REPRESENTATIVE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS:
(On their own initiative, Commission Members may make a brief announcement or a
brief report on their own activities. Commission Members may ask a question for
clarification, make a referral to staff or take action to have staff place a matter of
business on a future agenda. The Commission may take action on items listed on the
Agenda.)
PRESENTATION:
1. Presentation to Outstanding Community Services Department Volunteer
Jay DeCou.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (All items on the consent calendar are considered to
be routine and non -controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion
if no member of the Commission or public wishes to comment or ask questions.
If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the
consent calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an
opportunity for any member of the public to address the Commission concerning
the item before action is taken.)
1. Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes — November 15, 2007
■ Staff Recommendation: Commission approve the Parks and Recreation
Commission Minutes of the November 15, 2007 meeting. [Community
Services]
2. Parks and Recreation Commission Special Meetina Minutes —
December 20, 2007
■ Staff Recommendation: Commission approve the Parks and Recreation
Commission Special Meeting Minutes of the December 20, 2007 meeting.
[Community Services]
B. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Eagle Scout Project — Stadium Park Trailhead Signs (Swanson)
■ Fiscal Impact: All costs related to this project will be covered through
donations solicited by the Eagle Scout candidate.
■ Recommendation: Commission recommend approval of the proposed
project by Eagle Scout Zac Swanson to install trailhead signs in
Stadium Park. [Public Works]
2. PLN 2007-1243 / PLN 2007-1197 / PLN 2007-1251 General Plan
Amendment & Planned Development 7 Atascadero Avenue Triangle /
6905 Navajoa Avenue (City of Atascadero / MLW Holdings, LLC /
Atascadero Homeowners, LLC)
■ Fiscal Impact: Depending on option chosen, impacts will vary.
■ Recommendation: Commission recommend approval to the City
Council of the Draft Resolution recommending approval of General
Plan Amendment 2007-0019 and Zone Change 2007-0140 consistent
with the City Council's September 2007 direction at Atascadero
Avenue and San Andres. [Community Development]
3. Paloma Creek Park Plavaround Structure — Purchase and Installation
■ Fiscal Impact: Expenditure of $225,000 in previously allocated funds
for the replacement of the Paloma Creek Park playground structure, if
authorized by the City Council.
■ Recommendation: Commission review and recommend approval of
the selected playground structure to City Council. [Community
Services]
C. COMMITTEE & LIAISON REPORTS: (The following represent standing
committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary.):
1. Atascadero Youth Task Force - Next meeting 03/04/08 at 7:15 a.m.,
Atascadero Junior High School Library
2. Mayor/Mayor Pro Tem and Commission Chair/Vice Chair quarterly meeting —
03/03/08 at 12:00 p.m. (agenda to follow)
D. STAFF COMMENTS/ ANNOUNCEMENTS:
1. Mark Your Calendar:
■ 2/23/08 - SLOCAPRA 2008 Parks and Recreation Commissioners
Workshop (Hearst Castle Visitors Center)
■ T -Ball Opening Day — Saturday, March 15'" at 12:00 p.m., at Paloma
Park
■ Zoo Easter Egg Hunt — Saturday, March 22nd (more details to follow)
2. Colony Park Community Center Update
3. New Zoo Website www.CharlesPaddockZoo.org
3. Prescription Trails Brochure
4. Parks Project Update
E. ADJOURNMENT:
THE NEXT PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING MAY BE TENTATIVELY
SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 20, 2008, AT 7:00 P.M.
I, Shannon Sims, Administrative Assistant of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty
of perjury that the foregoing agenda for the February 21, 2008 Regular Session of the
Atascadero Parks and Recreation Commission was posted on Thursday, February 14, 2008 at
Atascadero City Hall, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 and was available for
public review in the Customer Service Center at that location.
Signed this 14th day of February, 2008 at Atascadero, California.
Shannon Sims, Administrative Assistant
City of Atascadero
City of Atascadero
WELCOME TO THE ATASCADER0 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING
The Parks and Recreation Commission meet in regular session on the third Thursday of each month at 7:00 p.m., in the
Atascadero City Hall, located at 6907 El Camino Real, Atascadero. The Parks and Recreation Commission consider
matters in the order of the printed Agenda.
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on
file in the Community Services Department and are available for public inspection during City Hall Annex, 6907 El
Camino Real, during business hours at the Central Receptionist counter and on our website; www.atascadero.org. An
agenda packet is also available for public review at the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road. All documents
submitted by the public during Parks and Recreation Commission meetings that are either read into the record or
referred to in their statement will be noted in the minutes and available for review in the Community Services
Department.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City
meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the Community Services Department at (805) 461-
5000. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed, will assist the City staff
in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS
Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Parks and Recreation Chairperson will identify
the subject, staff will give their report, and the Commission will ask questions of staff. The Chairperson will announce
when the public comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the Commission regarding the
matter being considered to step up to the podium. If you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way:
• You must approach the podium and be recognized by the Chairperson
• Give your name and address (not required)
• Make your statement
• All comments should be made to the Chairperson and Commission
• All comments limited to 5 minutes (unless changed by the Commission)
• No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so, and
no one may speak more than twice on any item.
The Chairperson will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public comments
will be heard by the Commission.
TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA
Under Agenda item, "COMMUNITY FORUM", the Chairperson will call for anyone from the audience having
business with the Parks and Recreation Commission to:
• Please approach the podium and be recognized
• Give your name and address (not required)
• State the nature of your business
This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Commission's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes
will be allowed for Community Forum (unless changed by the Commission).
TO HAVE ITEMS PLACED ON AGENDA
All business matters to appear on the Agenda must be in the Office of the Community Services Department
14 days preceding the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting. Should you have a matter you wish to
bring before the Commission, please mail or bring a written communication to the Community Services
Department in the City Hall Annex prior to the deadline.
ITEM NUMBER: A - 1
DATE: 02/21/2008
CITY OF A TA SCA DERO
PA RKS AND RECREA TION
COMMISSION
DRAFT MINUTES
Thursday, November 15, 2007 - 7:00 P.M.
Regular Meeting
REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M.
Chairperson Sechrist called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. and Commissioner
Istenes led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Hatch, Istenes, Marks, Mathews, Vice Chairperson
Butz and Chairperson Sechrist.
Student Representatives Buck -Moyer and Carden
Absent: Commissioner Chacon (excused)
Others Present: Recording Secretary Grace Pucci
Staff Present: Community Services Director Brady Cherry, Deputy Public Works
Director - Operations Geoff English, Senior Planner Kelly Gleason,
and Recreation Supervisor Jennifer Fanning.
COMMUNITY FORUM:
Russ James, 9470 Marchant Avenue, elaborated on the 9t" Annual Musical Holiday
Walk Around the Lake to be held on December 1 St
PRC Draft Minutes 11/15/07
Page 1 of 6
ITEM NUMBER: A - 1
DATE: 02/21/2008
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
MOTION: By Commissioner Marks and seconded by Commissioner
Mathews to approve the agenda.
Motion passed 6:0 by a roll -call vote.
COMMISSION/ YOUTH REPRESENTATIVE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS:
Vice Chairperson Butz spoke about the Coats for Kids Program and said that any
donations would be greatly appreciated.
Commissioner Hatch reported on the ground breaking for the Veteran's Memorial.
Chairperson Sechrist commented on the Veteran's Memorial ground breaking. He
thought it was well organized and well attended.
Commissioner Istenes reported on the County Parks and Recreation Meeting regarding
the trails in Heilmann Park.
PRESENTATIONS:
1. Presentation to Outstanding Community Services Department Volunteer
Lee Swam.
Community Services Director Brady Cherry spoke about Mr. Swam's contributions to
the community and presented him with a commemorative plaque.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR:
None.
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. a) Planned Development Overlay Zone #31: BMX Facility Master Plan
of Development (6575 Sycamore Rd. / Atascadero BMX)
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Commission recommend approval of the
proposed BMX facility with any recommendations regarding facility
design and standards for operation and agreements. [Community
Development]
PRC Draft Minutes 11/15/07
Page 2 of 6
ITEM NUMBER: A - 1
DATE: 02/21/2008
Senior Planner Kelly Gleason gave the staff report and answered questions of the
Commission.
PUBLIC COMMENT — None.
Commissioner Marks recommended adding a condition stating that if a soil amendment
is going to be used for dust control that it be evaluated and reviewed by staff to be sure
it is not one that will be an environmental hazard if the area floods.
MOTION: By Vice Chairperson Butz and seconded by Commissioner
Hatch to recommend approval of the proposed BMX facility
with the recommendation that any additives put into the soil
be approved by City staff.
Motion passed 6:0 by a roll -call vote.
b) Bicycle Moto -Cross (BMX) Track — Colony Park Site Alternative
■ Fiscal Impact: None. The BMX group will install and maintain the
track facility.
■ Recommendations: Commission:
1. Conceptually approve the BMX use at Colony Park on a three
(3) year basis; and
2. Provide any input as may be appropriate on the two (2) Draft
Agreements relating to the Track. [Community Services]
Community Services Director Brady Cherry gave the staff report and answered
questions of the Commission.
Commissioner Mathews expressed concern that this area was originally designated as
a ball field in the Master Plan. If the City strays from the original Plan created by many
stakeholders in the community, many intended uses will be lost. He suggested that the
Master Plan be revised prior to proceeding with any change of use.
Commissioner Istenes spoke in favor of this use as it would create fewer environmental
impacts to the riparian area than a baseball field would.
Chairperson Sechrist commented that if, at the three year point, the City proceeds with
the swimming pool, much of the parking will be lost making this use less feasible.
Regarding the lease, he suggested it should be amended to add the fact that this could
involve a Possessory Interest Tax.
PUBLIC COMMENT — None.
PRC Draft Minutes 11/15/07
Page 3 of 6
ITEM NUMBER: A - 1
DATE: 02/21/2008
Commissioner Mathews suggested adding a condition that within the term of this lease
the Master Plan would be revisited and addressed.
Commissioner Hatch stated she would like to see a cost evaluation on the Colony Park
site versus the Sycamore Road location. She believes the Colony Park site is a great
location but questions whether there is enough land for this use.
Chairperson Sechrist commented that he likes the Colony Park site for the BMX
because he is concerned they may not have the funds to complete the project at the
Sycamore Road site.
MOTION: By Commissioner Marks and seconded by Commissioner
Istenes to approve a conceptual plan for the BMX use at
Colony Park on a three (3) year basis.
Motion passed 6:0 by a roll -call vote.
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. a) Paloma Creek Park Playground Project Site Design
■ Fiscal Impact: Expenditure of $225,000 in previously allocated
funds for the replacement of the Paloma Creek Park playground
structure, if authorized by the City Council.
■ Recommendation: Commission review and recommend approval
of the project. [Community Services/Public Works]
Recreation Supervisor Jennifer Fanning and Deputy Public Works Director - Operations
Geoff English gave the staff report and answered questions of the Commission.
Casey Patterson, the landscape architect retained by the City, explained how the plan
was generated and answered questions of the Commission.
MOTION: By Commissioner Mathews and seconded by Vice Chairperson
Butz to recommend approval of the project.
Motion passed 6:0 by a roll -call vote.
b) Appointment of Paloma Creek Park Playground Equipment
Selection Sub -Committee Member
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Chairperson select a Commissioner to serve on
the Paloma Creek Park Playground Equipment Selection Sub -
Committee. [Community Services/Public Works]
PRC Draft Minutes 11/15/07
Page 4 of 6
ITEM NUMBER: A - 1
DATE: 02/21/2008
Recreation Supervisor Jennifer Fanning gave the staff report.
There was Commission consensus to have Student Representative Buck -Moyer
serve on the Paloma Creek Playground Equipment Selection Sub -Committee.
2. Santa Rosa Road / Atascadero Lake Park Pedestrian Bridae
Replacement Project
■ Fiscal Impact: $75,000 is included in the 2007/2009 Budget to replace
the existing pedestrian bridge. This is sufficient funding to design and
construct the project.
■ Recommendation: Commission receive report on Santa Rosa
Road/Atascadero Lake Park Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Project
and recommend using a prefabricated steel bridge to replace the
existing bridge. [Public Works]
Deputy Public Works Director - Operations Geoff English gave the staff report and
answered questions of the Commission.
MOTION: By Vice Chairperson Butz and seconded by Commissioner
Marks to recommend using a pre -fabricated steel bridge to
replace the existing bridge at Santa Rosa Road, Atascadero
Lake Park Pedestrian Bridge, with the inclusion of the
concrete structures.
Motion passed 6:0 by a roll -call vote.
3. Atascadero Parks and Recreation Commission Tentative 2008 Work
Plan
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Commission review and comment on the Calendar
of agenda items and projects within its jurisdiction for possible
consideration and action in 2008. [Community Services]
Community Services Director Brady Cherry gave the staff report and answered
questions of the Commission.
Commissioner Suggestions. -
1 .
uggestions:
1. Commissioner Istenes stated she would like to have the Alvord Field and Veteran's
Memorial landscape items moved to at least March.
2. Commissioner Marks suggested mapping of community trail systems.
3. Vice Chairperson Butz stated the list as presented was good.
4. Commissioner Istenes suggested adding the Anza Trail and equestrian use to the
list.
PRC Draft Minutes 11/15/07
Page 5 of 6
ITEM NUMBER: A - 1
DATE: 02/21/2008
D. COMMITTEE & LIAISON REPORTS:
1. Atascadero Youth Task Force - Next meeting 12/04/07
Chairperson Sechrist asked for suggestion of topics for the upcoming Council -Chair
Meeting. Topics currently planned for discussion are:
1) Conflict of interest
2) Orientation for new Commissioners and the annual training for all
Commissioners
3) Completion of the Commissioner's Manual
4) Goals of Council for Commissions
5) Scheduling a joint meeting with the Council to discuss goals, etc.
6) Commission's work plan review
Additional suggested topics to add to the list by the Commission were:
1) Encourage the Council to decide whether the City will be involved in the
completion of the RCD Trail Project.
E. STAFF COMMENTS/ ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Community Services Director Brady Cherry announced that the City Council approved
the Commission Norms with a few minor changes. The updated Norms will be
distributed to the Commission in their December agenda packets.
Community Services Director Brady Cherry discussed the December Special Meeting
and Commission holiday potluck.
F. ADJOURNMENT:
Chairperson Sechrist adjourned the meeting at 10:08 p.m. to the next regularly
scheduled meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission on December 20, 2007.
MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Shannon Sims, Administrative Assistant
PRC Draft Minutes 11/15/07
Page 6 of 6
ITEM NUMBER: A - 2
DATE: 02/21/2008
CITY OF A TA SCA DERO
PARKS AND RECREA TION
COMMISSION
DRAFT MINUTES
THURSDAY, December 20, 2007
6:00 P.M.
61:2 =19lt1 N:Is] q 11I_va6i *1*4to] Ll W&IIIl all LTA I
Chairperson Sechrist called the meeting to order at 6:10 p.m. and there was no Pledge
of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners Chacon, Istenes, Marks, Mathews, Student
Representative Paige Buck -Moyer, Vice -Chairperson Butz
and Chairperson Sechrist.
Absent: Commissioner Hatch (excused)
Student Representative Carden (excused)
Staff Present: Community Services Director Brady Cherry, Public Works
Deputy Director -Operations Geoff English, Zoo Director Alan
Baker, Recreation Supervisors Jennifer Fanning and Paula
Anton, Recreation Coordinators Courtney Jones and Ashley
Leiser.
Special Guests Present:
COMMUNITY FORUM:
Julie Dunn and Grace Pucci
Eric Greening encouraged the Commission to be involved in making recommendations
to the City Council on the RCD Creek project. He suggested this item be agendized for
the January Parks and Recreation Commission meeting.
PRC Draft Minutes 12/20//07
Page 1 of 2
ITEM NUMBER: A - 2
DATE: 02/21/2008
COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS:
None.
FNISLl+*4ZIIIKey _144ZIBI11Z;
None.
B. SPECIAL END OF THE YEAR REPORT:
1. 2007 Year in review.
Community Services Director Brady Cherry showed a power point presentation to the
Commission regarding the Department's 2007 events, programs, accomplishments and
answered questions of the Commission.
No Action Was Taken.
ADJOURNNMENT:
Chairperson Sechrist adjourned the meeting at 8:35 p.m. to the next regularly
scheduled meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission on January 17, 2008.
MEETING RECORDED AND MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Brady Cherry, Recording Secretary
The power point exhibit is available for review in the Community Services Department.
PRC Draft Minutes 12/20//07
Page 2 of 2
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 02/21/08
Atascadero Parks and Recreation Commission
Staff Report — Public Works Department
Eagle Scout Project
Stadium Park Trailhead Signs
(Swanson)
RECOMMENDATION:
Commission recommend approval of the proposed project by Eagle Scout Zac
Swanson to install trailhead signs in Stadium Park.
DISCUSSION:
Background: Eagle Scout, Zac Swanson, has requested permission to install trailhead
signs in Stadium Park. Previous trailhead signs were destroyed by vandals.
Upon approval, all work will be coordinated with City of Atascadero Park Maintenance
staff. Prior to construction, all appropriate permits will be required.
Conclusion: Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission
recommend approval of a proposed project to install trailhead signs in Stadium Park.
FISCAL IMPACT:
All costs related to this project will be covered through donations solicited by the Eagle
Scout candidate .
ALTERNATIVES:
None.
ATTACHMENT:
1. Aerial Photograph of Stadium Park Trails
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
Atascadero Parks and Recreation Commission
Staff Report - Community Development Department
PLN 2007-1243 / PLN 2007-1197 / PLN 2007-1251
General Plan Amendment & Planned Development 7
Atascadero Avenue Triangle / 6905 Navajoa Avenue
(City of Atascadero / MLW Holdings, LLC / Atascadero Homeowners, LLC)
RECOMMENDATION:
Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the Draft Resolution
recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 2007-0019 and Zone Change
2007-0140 consistent with the City Council's September 2007 direction at Atascadero
Avenue and San Andres.
REPORT -IN -BRIEF:
The proposed project consists of the following components:
1.) A City initiated General Plan Text Amendment, Land Use Diagram Amendment,
and Zoning Map Amendment. The project site is approximately 2.24 acres and
consists of three parcels. The General Plan Land Use designation on Lot 1 is
proposed to be changed from Recreation to High Density Residential. Currently,
the General Plan requires that the project site be developed with a Master Plan of
Development, including a minimum 1/2 acre pocket park. The City initiated
applications propose to amend the General Plan's Master Plan of Development
Overlay #12 to remove the requirement for a '/2 acre park on the Atascadero
Avenue Triangle site, and to allow two residential units on Lot 1, as directed by the
City Council.
2.) Lots 2 & 3 (MLW Holdings, LLC): The project proposes a PD -7 Overlay with nine
single-family units. The project includes a tree removal application for eight Black
Walnuts, totaling 310 inches DBH.
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
3.) Lot 1 (Atascadero Homeowners, LLCM A PD -7 Overlay is proposed on Lot 1. A
Tentative Parcel Map is included which proposes to create three parcels, two of
which are proposed to be developed with single-family residences, and the third is
proposed as a private landscape feature. Due the General Plan's Master Plan of
Development requirement on the subject site, and fact that the PD -7 does not allow
for a 2 -unit Planned Development, the application is being processed in conjunction
with the application above.
DISCUSSION:
Situation and Facts: PLN 2007-1243/ GPA 2007-0019 / ZCH 2007-0140
1. Applicant: City of Atascadero, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero,
CA 93422
2. Owners: Lot 1: Atascadero Homeowners, LLC, Kelly Gearhart,
6205 Alcantara Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422
Lots 2 & 3: MLW Holdings, LLC, PO Box 604,
Atascadero, CA 93423
3. Project Address: 6905 Navajoa Avenue (San Luis Obispo County)
APN 030-283-005; Lots 1, 2, and 3
4. General Plan Designation: High Density Residential (HDR) & Recreation (REC)
5. Zoning District: Residential Multi -Family -16 (RMF -16) & Recreation (L)
6. Site Area: Approximately 2.24 acres
7. Existing Use: Vacant
8. Environmental Status: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-0027
Situation and Facts: PLN 2007-1197 / ZCH 2007-0145
CUP 2007-0208 / TTM 2007-0101 / TRP 2007-0116
1. Applicant: Adamski, Moroski, Madden & Green, LLP
PO Box 3835, San Luis Obispo, CA 93403
2. Owner: MLW Holdings, LLC
PO Box 604, Atascadero, CA 93423
3. Project Address: 6905 Navajoa Avenue (San Luis Obispo County)
APN 030-283-005; Lots 2 and 3
ITEM NUMBER:
DATE:
4. General Plan Designation: High Density Residential (HDR)
5. Zoning District: Residential Multi -Family -16 (RMF -16)
6. Site Area: Approximately 1.86 acres
7. Existing Use: Vacant
B-2
02/21/08
8. Environmental Status: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-0027
Situation and Facts: PLN 2007-1251
ZCH 2007-0146 / TPM 2007-0091 / CUP 2007-0219
1. Applicant: Adamski, Moroski, Madden & Green, LLP
PO Box 3835, San Luis Obispo, CA 93403
2. Owner: Atascadero Homeowners, LLC, Kelly Gearhart
6205 Alcantara Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422
3. Project Address: 6905 Navajoa Avenue (San Luis Obispo County)
APN 030-283-005; Lot 1
4. General Plan Designation: Recreation (REC) (Proposed to change to High Density
Residential (HDR))
5. Zoning District: Recreation (L) (Proposed to change to Residential
Multi -Family -16 (RMF -16))
6. Site Area: Approximately 0.38 acres
7. Existing Use: Vacant
8. Environmental Status: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-0027
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
Background
Surrounding Land Use and Setting:
North: Residential Multifamily -16 units per acre
East: Public (Atascadero Library), Commercial Retail (Circle K), and Morro Road (Highway 41)
South: Residential Multifamily -10 units per acre
West: Residential Multifamily -10 units per acre and Limited Single Family -X (1/2 acre minimum lot size)
116'00 0570 bbbb blb- r u _.0 F'r,- 6300 6435 wu5:61C+:
V `` UO -
6500 63S
0` boy RMF 16 6S2o �d°� c1 95
657 C R & i
ss\ 'iso c° S, 6681 6600 PD -3 5
s Qs e� 6683
1 I}
1 8190 1— 87
26 / 9 648
&725 C& <'
s7 n RMF -16 F' 635(
........ LSF -X
6735 / o ��
o r .�
6820X43 6860 9 6905 6°�1 0
6880
516 5 � �✓
6870
RMF -10 P
- . 6725
6020 11 I' 69z0 :.sass 693 t CR
%1 6970 e989 6940 i 6 7650
7055
Project Site
6905 Navajoa Avenue
aantreS kVemte� L
7040 +.
/� '..1. loss RMF -10 i
70go ro, 7o5a II >0ss C P °
�8s 7.7 7� 70707"5700 ci�.O
a -7035
The project site, referred to in the General Plan as the "Atascadero Avenue Triangle," is
located just off of Morro Road. The project site is bordered by Navajoa Avenue,
Atascadero Avenue, and San Andres Avenue. The site consists of three underlying
Colony lots, totaling approximately 2.24 acres.
Following the 1992 General Plan Update, the entire site (all three parcels) had a
General Plan Designation of Recreation (REC) and a conflicting Zoning Map
Designation of Residential Multi -Family (RMF -16). The original owner, Wes O'Reily
applied for a multi -family building permit in 2000. Staff determined that the permit could
not be processed because of the General Plan inconsistency and recommended the
owner request to have the property's land use redesignated in the General Plan Update
that was in process at the time. The owner resubmitted the request which was
considered during the General Plan Update. During the General Plan Update hearings,
there was considerable public comment and Council discussion about the need for a
park next to the library. Many members of the public requested that the City retain the
park designation for the entire site and the City build a park. The Council decided to
designate the corner near Morro Road for a'/2 -acre park and designate the remainder of
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
the site for 10 residential units. The General Plan created a Master Plan of
Development Overlay (MPD Overlay #12) requirement for the site (refer to following
maps.) The MPD Overlay currently allows for 10 residential units and a '/2 -acre park
that is required to be developed concurrently with the housing project.
At the time of the General Plan Update, it was not known that the site had three
underlying lots of record. Sometime in the last several years, Kelly Gearhart purchased
the site and proposed a Planned Development consistent with the General Plan.
In May of 2006, the project proposed by Kelly Gearhart was reviewed by the Council
with regards to the issue of park improvements and maintenance. At that meeting, the
Council decided to defer the improvement and acquisition of the park and require the
developer to provide a passive landscaped open space area in the location of the park.
The project was eventually withdrawn and MLW Holdings, LLC purchased two of the
parcels. Currently, the two MLW Holdings parcels (Lots 2 and 3) are designated for
residential multi -family units, and the third parcel (Lot 1) is owned by Atascadero
Homeowners, LLC and designated as Recreation.
In early 2007, legal issues were raised by the property owners regarding the park
requirement for this project. In September of 2007, the City Council discussed the
issues and options surrounding the General Plan's '/2 acre park requirements.
Atascadero Homeowners, LLC requested that the City amend the General Plan to
eliminate all requirements for a public park on the site. As an alternative, the owner of
the park parcel made an initial offer to sell the property to the City for $300,000, should
the City choose to purchase and develop the site.
There are three legal issues which were raised by the applicant's attorney surrounding
the park requirement for this project. The Council considered these issues at the
September 2007 meeting.
1.) Is the General Plan requirement for the dedication and improvement of a
half -acre park, as a condition to developing a 10 -unit residential
subdivision, constitutional?
City Attorney's Opinion:
Federal and State constitutional law restrict the City's ability to compel the
dedication of land as a condition of granting discretionary approvals. The well
known Nollan-Dolan line of Supreme Court cases provides that any requirement
that a property owner dedicate property must be related to the impacts of the
proposed development and that the amount or value of the property to be
dedicated must be roughly proportional to those impacts. In other words, there
must be a "nexus" between the compelled dedication and the impacts, and the
amount of land dedication sought must be "roughly proportional" to the impact of
the project. To compel the dedication of some or the entire 0.47 acre site for a
pocket park, the City must be able to show that the dedication will mitigate the
impacts of the residential development and that the amount of land that must be
dedicated is not disproportional to those impacts.
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
2.) Is there a nexus between the development of the 10 residential units and
the need for a park?
City Attorney's Opinion:
There is certainly a nexus between the housing project and the need for
additional park area, including the improvements. The more difficult question is
whether the requirement for a half -acre parcel is roughly proportional to the
impacts on the City's parks and recreation and the need for the improvements.
Based on the analysis done under the Quimby Act, the City would be imposing a
dedication in excess of the normal exaction for parks.
The City Parkland Dedication requirement is five (5) acres of property for
each 1,000 person residing in the city to be devoted to public parks, public
recreational trails and/or public recreation facilities. The requirements in
this case, assuming 10 units, with an average of three (3) persons per unit
would require a dedication of 0.15 acre of parkland. The half acre
requirement is over three times the parkland dedication requirement, and
does not factor in the requirement to install the improvements
While the General Plan is the constitution for development throughout the City,
and is the vehicle through which competing interests and the needs of the
citizenry are balanced and meshed, it must be consistent with the general laws of
the State of California, and the Federal and State Constitutions. In this case, the
applicant argues that the General Plan requirement for the park dedication is
unconstitutional in that it violates the Fifth Amendment of the United States
Constitution.
3.) Is the exaction roughly proportional between the impacts of the
project on park and recreational facilities?
City Attorney's Opinion:
To demonstrate rough proportionality, the City must document the connection
between the exaction and the projected impact of the proposed development.
Findings must establish the required reasonable relationship between the
required exaction and the impact. This requires an assessment of whether this
condition is in reasonable proportion to the burden created by the new
development. This may be possible, but the courts will give the findings a
heightened level scrutiny since the exactions are imposed on a few parcels and
not on a broad class of property owners.
At the September 2007 discussion, the City Council agreed that the City does not have
the funds to purchase or maintain a public park, and the Council directed staff to work
on a General Plan Amendment to eliminate the requirement for the '/2 acre park on Lot
1. At the Council's direction, Lot 1 would be rezoned from Recreation to High Density
Residential. The Council discussed the option for the owner to develop Lot 1 with two
residences, recommending that the site include additional landscape buffer or
affordable housing.
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
ANALYSIS:
Part 1: City Initiated General Plan Amendment and Zone Map Change:
Based on City Council's direction at the September 2007 meeting, staff has prepared a
General Plan Amendment and Zone Change consisting of the following items:
1. Amendment proposed to change the General Plan Land Use Designation on Lot 1 of
APN 030-283-005 from Recreation (REC) to High Density Residential (HDR).
2. Amendment proposed to change the Atascadero Municipal Code Zoning Designation
on Lot 1 of APN 030-283-005 from Recreation (L) to Residential Multi -family, with 16
units per acre (RMF -16).
3. Amend the Master Plan of Development requirements identified in the General Plan
Land Use, Open Space, and Conservation Element Table II -5, Master Plan of
Development Overlay #12: "Atascadero Avenue Triangle." The proposed
amendment would keep the master plan requirement on the site so that all three
parcels would be planned and developed together. However, the requirement for the
'/z acre pocket park is proposed to be removed, and Lot 1 would be allowed to be
developed with up to two residences.
Atascadero
=' Avenue
"Lot 3 *,
�. Morro Road
Lot 2.'�r
Lot 1
Lots 2&3:
• Owner: MLW Holdings, LLC
• Currently zoned RMF -16
• Housing site (10 units max allowed by
current General Plan requirements)
• Proposed development includes PD -7
for 9 single-family residential units
Lot 1:
• Owner: Atascadero Homeowners, LLC
• Current zoning: Recreation
• Currently includes General Plan
Requirement for 1/2 park
• Proposed to be rezoned to RMF -16
• Proposed General Plan amendment to
remove'/2 acre park requirement
• Proposed development includes PD -7
for 3 lots, including 2 single-family
residential units and a private park
parcel at the corner
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
Existing General Plan Text:
City of:> tascade-rc
General Plan Land Use, Open Space and Conservation Element
Table II -5: Master Plan of Development Overlav Areas.
Overlay'
Location
EIR Maxinium Density
Special Features
Number
I
Rochelle Single Family Project
50 single family residential units
=oues:rian staging area with Salinas
max.
R ver : Ce Anza Trail access requirc:i
• Trail connection to EI Camino Rea
revireo
2
Woodlands Specific Plan
269 residential units max:
Specific Plan approval required
143 single family units max
Minimum 0 - open space required
126 mufti -family units max
3.
Dove Creek Mixed Used Center
200 dweling units max
300,000 square feet ofGeneral
Plan Master Plan of
commercial develo mens
Development Overlay #12
4.
Neighborhood Shopping Center:
Commercial Center 80,0 s=
"Atascadero Avenue Triangle"
South San Anselmo at
EI Camino Real
Development Standards
5
Neighborhood Shopping Center:
Commercial Center 1 000 sf
proposed to be amended.
Northeast Del Rio at
EI Camino Real
1/2 acre park would not be
required. Proposed amendment
would allow up to 10 residential
units on Lots 2 and 3, and up to
2 residential units on Lot 1. Lot
1 shall include additional
landscape buffer in place of the
pocket park.
6
Southeast Del Rio at
EI Camino Real
Commercial Cert 15--1. -
7
Single Family Cluster
Development
56 clustered et rate ur ,:
'.i acre densi _
4 deed re cted affordat ,�
bonus uni {moderate incomes
[25% de di bonus]
The Master Plan of
8.
Mixed Use Center
Nixed se Commercial Cer*.e
Portola /US 101
'70. 0 sf
Development Overlay shall
1.
Neighborhood Shopping Center
Neilf borhood Commercial
continue to remain as a
Southeast Curbaril at El Camino
ter 20,000 square feet
requirement of this site to
Real
ensure compatibility of the
10.
Northend Annexation
o increased intensity mocH-c
development on the site
• _ .: is access :o Paso mob es Greek
•-o aired.
1 'I .
Eagle Ranch •A^ _i::_ .
Development of existing 400
Specific Plan requ red
colony lots
Historic colony lots and roads to oe
reconfigured and clustered to T n
~?pacts
• 'ublic open space; :ra Is and parkas Lo
be provided.
1
Atascadero Avenue Triangle0
res cential units with a
Docket park shall be mproved
minimum 112 acre pocket park
concu•rently win housirg p,ciect.
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
Proposed General Plan Text Change:
Proposed text change to the EIR Maximum Density and Special features of Master Plan
of Development #12: "Atascadero Avenue Triangle."
017Rrlav
Number
Cify cf A ascaderc
General P'mi Land Use, Open Space ind Conser,.,a[ on Element
Table II -5:
Location
Master Plan of Dev elopnient Overlay Areas.
EIR Maxininui Density I Special Features
12.
Atascadero Avenue Triangle
e 10 dwelling units
• Development on Lot 1 shall
combined max on Lots
include additional landscape
2 & 3
buffer
• 2 dwelling units max on
Lot 1
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
Part #2: Proposed Development Projects:
Two separate applications for Planned Developments have been submitted for
development of the three parcels, since the parcels are the under ownership of two
different entities. The first application proposes a Planned Development 7 on Lots 2
and 3, consisting of nine single-family units, each on individual lots. A second
application has been submitted for Lot 1, also for a Planned Development 7. The
second application consists of two single-family units on individual lots, and a third lot
which would be developed with a private, fenced landscape area to be owned and
maintained by the current owner, Atascadero Homeowners Association.
The applications must be processed together for two reasons:
1.) General Plan Master Plan of Development Overlay #12: The General Plan
requirements have been proposed to be amended by the City initiated General Plan
Amendment, however, the site is still required to provide a Master Plan of
Development per the General Plan Overlay #12 shown in Table II -5. A Master Plan
of Development will ensure consistent development throughout this highly visible
site.
2.) Proposed 2 -unit PD -7: One of the requirements of the Planned Development 7
Overlay states that, "A proposed planned development project shall consist of no
fewer than four (4) residential units". The application on Lot 1 includes only two
residential units. A special finding must be made to approve this separate
application. It is staff's opinion that a 2 -unit PD -7 would be acceptable in this
circumstance based on the two applications with a total of 11 units. The resolutions
have been conditioned that the projects be developed together, and that one joint
homeowners association be provided for all 11 units to create consistency
throughout the project (Conditions 10 and 11.)
Both site plans have been designed to meet the requirements of the Atascadero
Municipal Code and the appearance review requirements of the General Plan. Lot
sizes in both projects range from 5700 to 8700 sq. ft. in size. The residences are
proposed at approximately 1567 sq. ft. with two -car garages. A total of 4,040 cu. yards
of fill would be required to develop the 11 units on all three lots.
As a Planned Development, the City Council must find that each project provides high
quality architectural, landscape, and site design to warrant the granting of special
development standards for a Planned Development project. The following sections
provide an analysis of these requirements.
Site Plan and Circulation
Both site plans have been designed to take access off the public street frontages. The
11 single family units each have private driveways that meet the guest parking
requirement of the PD -7. The units each face the street adjacent to the property,
consistent with
The site plan
Development 7.
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
the surrounding single family residences on the adjacent properties.
s designed to meet all of the setback requirements of a Planned
Frontage improvements are proposed along all street frontages, including Atascadero
Avenue, Navajoa Avenue, and San Andres Avenue. The streets would be widened as
to City requirements, and sidewalks are included along all frontages. Driveways and
frontage improvements have been designed to retain the existing native trees where
possible.
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
Landscape Design and Private Landscape Feature
The Preliminary Landscape Plan has been designed to retain existing mature native
trees where feasible. Proposed landscaping includes drought tolerant shrubs and
accent plants. In staff's opinion, the proposed Landscape Plan and palette, as
conditioned, meets the Planned Development appearance review requirements.
A third parcel for landscape is proposed at the corner of Atascadero Avenue and San
Andres is designed to act as a buffer between the residences and Morro Road. The
landscape area would be fenced and gated for private use by the current owner,
Atascadero Homeowners Association. The lot is not proposed for use by the adjacent
planned development and will not be maintained by a homeowners association. A
condition has been included in the resolution to ensure maintenance of the park by the
private property owner: "The private open space feature at the corner of Atascadero
Avenue and San Andres shall be maintained by the property owner. All landscape shall
be maintained in good condition and the site shall be kept free of litter and graffiti"
(Condition #10.)
Pathways with decorative pavement are included through the private landscape feature.
A dry pond made of cobble rocks is located at the front of the area. A dry creek
meanders through the area and combines with the landscape on the residential lot next
door. Ground cover is made up of low shrubs and perennials. Larger trees line the
back of the area to provide privacy for the adjacent residential properties. A statue is
proposed at the center of the private landscape feature.
The proposed private landscape feature includes a decorative wall and fence along the
property line at the corner facing Morro Road. Access gates would be located on each
street frontage, and would allow the area to be locked for security purposes. The wall
is proposed at 2'-8' in height with a wrought iron fence on top. The fence/wall
combination has been proposed by the applicant at six feet in height. The Atascadero
Municipal Code limits fences within the front setback to a three foot maximum height in
order to provide adequate visibility and an open, neighborhood feeling along street
frontages. The Planning Commission discussed this issue and recommended a
condition be added to limit the fence height to five feet (Condition 25.) A five foot fence
still exceeds the Municipal Code height limit and requires an exception to be approved
by City Council with the approval of the proposed planned development.
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
Landscape Plan, Lot 1
2 units and 3rd lot with a private landscape feature
'A
Landscape Plan, Lots 2 & 3
9 Single -Family Units
ITEM NUMBER:
DATE:
Sketch of proposed Private Landscape Feature
Proposed wall/fence around landscape feature
Conditioned by Planning Commission to be no more than 5 feet in height
% PLAT POST TOP
>/Y 14 MMT
ELEVATION, L—A >CST BiACKST
STREET SIDE Sncco FINISH SECTI(
Y.O. coNN0Y0RATM A -A
TIL[
'-�6' COMMEMORATIVE WALL
N.T.S.
B-2
02/21/08
RAdClT
PINiSN
NNlYORATM
XK WALL
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
Conclusion
With the approval of the City -initiated General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map
Amendment, the proposed development projects, as conditioned, would be consistent
with the requirements of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The proposed GPA
would amend the Master Plan of Development requirement of the Atascadero Avenue
Triangle to no longer require a '/2 acre park on the subject site. A Master Plan of
Development would still be required for the three sites to ensure that cohesive
development occurs on the parcels. The General Plan and Zoning Designation would
be amended, and Lot 1 would be allowed to be developed with up to two residences.
It is staff's opinion that the proposed development projects, as conditioned, meet the
minimum requirements of the General Plan and all applicable provisions of the Zoning
Ordinance. The projects incorporate appearance review of architectural design,
materials, and landscaping, and incorporate architectural themes into the site and
building designs, as conditioned. Native trees have been preserved where feasible and
required conditions and mitigation measures have been appropriately incorporated into
the project. As analyzed within the project Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative
Declaration, the proposed Master Plan of Development would have no significant
environmental impacts and will not be detrimental to the general public or working
persons health, safety, or welfare. Based on the analysis in the preceding sections, it
appears that all of the required findings for project approval can be made.
ALTERNATIVES
1. The Parks and Recreation Commission may make recommendations about the
General Plan and Zoning Amendments and/or project design.
2. The Parks and Recreation Commission may recommend that the City Council
deny the requested project. The Commission should state why they feel the
project should be denied. If the Commission denies the City initiated General
Plan Amendment and Zone Change, the two development applications can not
be approved.
PREPARED BY: Callie Taylor, Associate Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1:
Location, General Plan, and Zoning Map
Attachment 2:
Letter from neighbor
Attachment 3:
Planning Commission Minutes
Attachment 4:
Parks and Recreation Commission Draft Resolution for
Recommendation of Approval
Attachment 5:
Parks and Recreation Commission Draft Resolution for
Recommendation of Denial
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
Attachment 1: Location, General Plan and Zoning Map
d5�
F/ A% RMF 16 63?o
& .`
1* C25
e"00
0%CR &
so 6", '% - 8885s PD -3
07908723
o --, 6, -SS �� E795 05 6875 635
9920 r 68656885 f i
_RS ; LSF -X des W60 T 8895 0
9980 0
6905
6070d3
-_
ewo P Project Site
eM :.No. 6130 ; RMF -16
CR �� ��x�jaa�.Axertu.e
O O "91 894
I�
OWA
lb� `- t
I s�' �' �, 1-077�� CP 5 00 �1
Lots 2 & 3:
• Currently zoned RMF -16
• Housing site (10 units max allowed
by current General Plan
requirements)
Lot 1:
• Current zoning: Recreation
• Currently includes General Plan
Requirement for 1/2 park
• Proposed to be rezoned to RMF -16
• Proposed General Plan amendment
to remove'/2 acre park requirement
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
Attachment 2: Letter from Neighbor
Dear Atascadero Council Members:
My name is Mary Martindale and I live at 6895 Atascadero AV. My concerns
about the Navajoa Avenue Development are the following.
My first concern is about changing the General Plan for Lot 1 from Recreation
to High Density Residential. Why? Our sweet small town is being eaten up with
concrete and needs dirt and trees in order to breathe.
I hope that the roads will be the first on the Developers' list and that the
Developer will pay for the so-called improvement. Lots 2 & 3 will have nine 2 -
car garages, 18 new cars. Lot 1 will have at least four new cars. Atascadero AV
and San Andres AV are heavy with High School traffic now, and of course the
school will only grow.
And there are two other developments in the immediate vicinity: across Navajoa
and 1/2 block down Atascadero AV. It's amazing to me the number of new cars
the City Council thinks we can tolerate.
Sincerely,
Mary Martindale
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
ATTACHMENT 3: Planning Commission Minutes
5. PLN 2007-1197. PLN 2007-1243. PLN 2007-1251, 6905 NAVAJOA AVE.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
Owners:
Lot 1: Atascadero Homeowners, LLC, Kelly Gearhart, 6205 Alcantara Avenue,
Atascadero, CA 93422
Lots 2 & 3: MLW Holdings, LLC, P.O. Box 604, Atascadero, CA 93423
Applicants:
General Plan Amendment: City of Atascadero, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA
93422
Planned Development Proiect: Adamski, Moroski, Madden & Green, LLP, P.O. Box
3835, San Luis Obispo, CA 93403
Project Title:
PLN 2007-12431 PLN 2007-12511 PLN 2007-1197
General Plan Amendment for Atascadero Avenue 11 -Unit Residential Planned
Development
Project Location:
6905 Navajoa Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422
(San Luis Obispo County) APN 030-283-005; Lots 1, 2, and 3
Project
The project consists of an application for a City initiated General Plan Text
Description:
Amendment, Land Use Diagram Amendment, and Zoning Map Amendment. The
project site is approximately 1.9 acres and consists of three parcels. The General
Plan Land Use designation on Lot 1 would be changed from Recreation to High
Density Residential. Currently. the General Plan requires that the project site be
developed with a Master Plan of Development, including a minimum'/: acre park on
Lot 1. This application proposes to amend the Master Plan of Development to
remove the requirement for a % acre park, and allow two residential units on Lot 1.
Two separate applications have been submitted for the development of the parcels.
1.) Lot 1: A PD -7 Overlay is proposed on Lot 1. A Parcel Map is included which
proposes to create three parcels, two of which will be developed with single-family
residences, and the third is proposed as a private park.
2.) Lots 2 & 3: The project proposes a PD -7 Overlay with nine single-family units.
The project includes a tree removal application for 8 Black Walnuts, totaling 310
inches DBH.
Lot sizes in both projects range from 5700-8700 sq. ft. The residences are
proposed at approximately 1567 sq. ft. with two -car garages. A total of 4,040 cu.
yards of fill will be required to develop the 11 units. Drainage basins are
incorporated into the site plan and the residences would connect to City sewer.
General Plan Designation: High Density Residential (HDR) & Recreation (REC)
Zoning District: Residential Multi -Family -16 (RMF -16) & Recreation (L)
Proposed
Based on the Initial Study prepared for the project, a Negative Declaration is
Environmental
proposed. The proposed Negative Declaration is available for public review from
Determination:
December 27, 2007 through January 15, 2008 at 6907 EI Camino Real. Community
Development Department, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Associate Planner Callie Taylor gave the staff report and answered questions of the
Commission.
[21111,114 111111901i3k1r,IITi1:11kg1I
Ty Green, applicant's representative; stated there would be no homeowners association
for this project, spoke about the buffer area; and explained why the original park idea
has gone away. Mr. Green answered questions of the Commission.
Kelly Gearhart, applicant, answered questions of the Commission.
PC Draft Minutes 01/15/08
Page 5 of 8
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
Sharon Turner stated her support for the development of this site and asked several
questions regarding traffic safety, the need for stop signs to slow traffic, noise buffers
and the fence proposed for the site.
Brian Newsome expressed concern regarding the corner of the landscape buffer and
the drainage at that site. Mr. Newsome asked for a condition that the drainage in the
area be looked at seriously.
Kelly Gearhart addressed traffic and drainage issues raised by the previous speakers.
Sharon Turner asked about a homeowners association for the project and if the road
could be paved on all three sides.
Chairperson O'Keefe closed the Public Comment period.
City Engineer Steve Kahn addressed issues raised during the Public Comment period.
Commissioner Heatherington stated she had a hard time getting past 1/10 of an acre
not being for the public, and questioned if it would be a gift of public funds.
Community Development Director Frace stated this was not a gift of public funds and
explained the requirement under the city's ordinances and sub division map act.
Commissioner O'Grady spoke of the vision of the General Plan and stated the
elimination of the public park at this location is a cut to that plan. He commented that
the benefits of this project were dubious and was concerned with the slow housing
market at this time and its affect on this project. In addition he stated that given the
amount of money the Council has been authorizing for consultants, the maintenance
costs for this park was not a burden; rather it was a question of priorities.
Chairperson O'Keefe recessed the hearing at 9:25 p.m
Chairperson O'Keefe called the meeting back to order at 9:30 p.m.
MOTION: By Commissioner Slane and seconded by Commissioner Jack
to adopt Resolution PC 2008-0004 recommending that the City
Council certify Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2007-
0027; and, adopt Resolution PC 2008-0005 recommending that
the City Council approve General Plan Amendment 2007-0019.
amending the development requirements identified in General
Plan Table 11-5, Master Plan of Development Overlay #12:
"Atascadero Avenue Triangle." and changing the General Plan
Land Use Designation on Lot 1 of APN 030-283-005 from
Recreation (REC) to High Density Residential (HDR): and.
adopt Resolution PC 2008-0006 recommending that the City
PC Draft Minutes OV15?OB
Page 6 of 8
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
Council introduce an Ordinance for first reading by title only.
to approve Zoning Map Amendment 2007-0140. changing the
Atascadero Municipal Code Zoning Designation on Lot 1 of
AON 030-283-005 from Recreation (L) to Residential Multi-
family, with 16 units per acre (RMF -16); and, adopt Resolution
PC 2008-0007 recommending that the City Council introduce
an Ordinance for first reading by title only, to approve Zone
Change 2007-0145 to allow a 9 -unit PD -7 and Zone Change
2007-0146 to allow a 2 -unit PD -7 based on findings: and, adopt
Resolution PC 2008-0008 recommending that the City Council
approve Conditional Use Permit 2007-0208 (Master Plan of
Development for 9 -unit PD -7) based on findings and subject to
Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring: and, adopt
Resolution PC 2008-0009 recommending that the City Council
approve Tentative Tract Map 2007-0101 to create nine parcels
on Lots 2 and 3. based on findings and subject to Conditions
of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring. Adopt Resolution PC
2008-0010 recommending that the City Council approve
Conditional Use Permit 2007-0219 (Master Plan of
Development for 2 -unit PD -7 and private park) based on
findings and subject to Conditions of Approval and Mitigation
Monitoring: and. adopt Resolution PC 2008-0011
recommending that the City Council approve Tentative Parcel
Map 2007-0091 to create three parcels on Lot 1, based on
findings and subject to Conditions of Approval and Mitigation
Monitoring. The following changes will be made to the
conditions:
1. A traffic warrant study to be done concerning Atascadero
Avenue and San Andreas streets and how traffic impacts
that.
2. Reduce the fence size of the buffer zone to five foot.
3. Accept the staff recommendations for the change of colors
and architecture
4. Conditions No. 9. of both the Master Plan of Development
and Map shall read: All tract maintenance costs listed
below shall be 100-y,, funded by the project in perpetufty.
The bulleted list to remain unchanged.
5. Conditions No. 10 of both the Master Plan of Development
and Map shall read: The private open space feature at the
corner of Atascadero Avenue and San Andreas shall be
maintained and owned by the property owner. All
landscape shall be maintained in good condition and the
site shall be kept free of litter and graffiti.
Motion passed 5:2 by a roll -call vote. (O'Grady. Heatherington
opposed)
PC Draft Minutes 01.'15.'08
Page 7of8
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
ATTACHMENT 4: Parks and Recreation Commission Draft resolution for Recommendation of Approval of
General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, and Planned Development Projects
1.11:7:11W8;7x1111111111M[1120IM:Z.19919111 vp
RESOLUTION OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2007-0019, AMENDING
THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DIAGRAM DESIGNATION OF LOT 1
OF APN 030-283-005 FROM RECREATION (L) TO HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (HDR) AND AMENDING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
GENERAL PLAN MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY #12
AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE 2007-0145,
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP DESIGNATION FROM
RECREATION (L) TO RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY WITH 16 UNITS
PER ACRE (RMF -16) AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A 9 -UNIT
AND A 2 -UNIT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AS PROPOSED
(ATASCADERO AVENUE TRIANGLE)
APN 030-283-005; Lots 1, 2, and 3
6905 Navajoa Avenue
(City of Atascadero / Atascadero Homeowners, LLC / MLW Holdings, LLC)
WHEREAS, an applications have been received from the City of Atascadero, 6907 El
Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422, (Applicant), Atascadero Homeowners, LLC, 6205
Alcantara Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422, (Applicant and Property Owner), and MLW
Holdings, LLC, P.O. Box 604, Atascadero, CA 93423, (Applicant and Property Owner) to
consider a project consisting of an amendment to the requirements of the General Plan Master
Plan of Development Overlay #12: "Atascadero Avenue Triangle," a General Plan Land Use
Diagram Amendment from Recreation (REC) to High Density Residential (HDR), and a Zoning
Map Change from L (Recreation) to RMF -16 (Residential Multi -family) on a 0.38 -acre site
located at 6905 Navajoa (Lot 1 of APN 030-283-005) and two Planned Development Projects
consisting of nine units and two units each located at 6905 Navajoa (Lots 1, 2,and 3 of APN 030-
283-005); and,
WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject applications
was held by the Parks and Recreation Commission of the City of Atascadero on February 21,
2008 at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said project;
and,
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
NOW THEREFORE, the Parks and Recreation Commission of the City of Atascadero,
hereby resolves to recommend that the proposed project be approved by the City Council
consistent with the following:
Exhibit A: General Plan Land Use Diagram Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment
Exhibit B: General Plan Table II -5 Amendment; Amendment of Master Plan of
Development Overlay #12 Requirements
Exhibit C: Site Plan: Lot 1 of APN 030-283-005
On motion by Commissioner , and seconded by Commissioner
, the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO
ME
ATTEST:
Chairperson
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
Exhibit A: General Plan Land Use Diagram Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment
uenerai rian Lana use wagram
Amendment
APN 030-283-005: Lot 1:
Existing General Plan Land Use:
REC (Recreation)
Proposed General Plan Land Use:
HDR (High Density Residential — 16 units per
acre)
e-umng rviap wmenamenz
APN 030-283-005; Lot 1:
Existing Zoning:
L (Recreation)
Proposed Zoning:
RMF -16 (Residential Multi -family — 16 units per
acre
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
Exhibit 13: General Plan Table II -5; Amendment of MPD Overlay#12 Development Requirements
=r#u cf:ito�s��derc
General Paan Land Use, Open Space and Con_.ervar-on Element
Table II -5: Master Plan of Developnient v-erlay Areas.
O'Vealay Location EIR hvlaxciniuni Density Special Features
Number
12.
Atascadero Avenue Triangle
. 10 dwelling units
• Development on Lot 1 shall
combined max on Lots
include additional landscape
2 & 3
buffer
• 2 dwelling units max on
Lot 1
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
Exhibit C: Site Plan: Lot 1 of APN 030-283-005 (Current Pocket Park to be Substituted for a 2 -unit Planned
Development and a Private Landscape Feature)
U�UJ
,,\LLJ
a. OC •' `
.
I
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
ATTACHMENT 5: Parks and Recreation Commission Draft resolution for Recommendation of Denial of
General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, and Planned Development Projects
DRAFT RESOLUTION FOR DENIAL
RESOLUTION OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
DENIAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2007-0019, ZONE CHANGE
2007-0149 AND ASSOCIATED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
(ATASCADERO AVENUE TRIANGLE)
APN 030-283-005; Lots 1, 2, and 3
6905 Navajoa Avenue
(City of Atascadero / Atascadero Homeowners, LLC / MLW Holdings, LLC)
WHEREAS, an applications have been received from the City of Atascadero, 6907 El
Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422, (Applicant), Atascadero Homeowners, LLC, 6205
Alcantara Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422, (Applicant and Property Owner), and MLW
Holdings, LLC, P.O. Box 604, Atascadero, CA 93423, (Applicant and Property Owner) to
consider a project consisting of an amendment to the requirements of the General Plan Master
Plan of Development Overlay #12: "Atascadero Avenue Triangle," a General Plan Land Use
Diagram Amendment from Recreation (REQ to High Density Residential (HDR), and a Zoning
Map Change from L (Recreation) to RMF -16 (Residential Multi -family) on a 0.38 -acre site
located at 6905 Navajoa (Lot 1 of APN 030-283-005) and two Planned Development Projects
consisting of nine units and two units each located at 6905 Navajoa (Lots 1, 2,and 3 of APN 030-
283-005); and,
WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject applications
was held by the Parks and Recreation Commission of the City of Atascadero on February 21,
2008 at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said project;
and,
NOW THEREFORE, the Parks and Recreation Commission of the City of Atascadero,
hereby resolves to recommend that the proposed project be denied by the City Council.
ITEM NUMBER: B - 2
DATE: 02/21/08
On motion by Commissioner , and seconded by Commissioner
, the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO
C
ATTEST:
Chairperson
ITEM NUMBER: B - 3
DATE: 02/21/08
Atascadero Parks and Recreation Commission
Staff Report - Community Services & Public Works
Paloma Creek Park Playground Structure
Purchase & Installation
RECOMMENDATION:
Commission review and recommend approval of the selected playground structure to
the City Council.
DISCUSSION:
Background: Paloma Creek Park is a public park on the south end of Atascadero. The
park has soccer fields, a little league field, two lighted softball fields and a group picnic
area. Paloma Creek Park's playground was highly used by many of the different user
groups at the park, but it was completely removed over a year ago due to outdated
equipment and safety issues. With no playground, the park offers no other structured
play for children while at the park. In this fiscal year there was funding provided to
replace the playground area at Paloma Creek Park.
Analysis: The Commission previously approved the Site Design for a new playground
area as well as other park amenities (11-15-07). Staff sent out a Request for Proposal
to over ten playground companies asking them to submit a proposal for the specified
playground area at Paloma Creek Park (Attachment A). There were six proposals
submitted by the January 25, 2008 deadline. The Paloma Creek Park Playground
Selection Committee (Attachment B) met on January 31, 2008 to review the submitted
playground proposals. From that meeting the Committee selected three companies to
return and present their proposal.
On February 7, 2008 three playground companies presented their playground proposals
to the Committee. At the conclusion of the presentations, the Committee selected the
company that was their top pick for playground design and equipment, Dave Bang
Assoc., Inc. (Attachment C).
Conclusion: Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission approve the
proposed Playground equipment for the Paloma Creek Park Playground area.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Expenditure of $225,000 in previously allocated funds for the replacement of the
Paloma Creek Park playground structure, if authorized by the City Council.
ATTACHMENTS:
A — Request for Proposal for Paloma Creek Park Playground Equipment
B — Playground Selection Committee
C — Dave Bang Playground schematic
D — Approved Paloma Creek Park Site Design Plan
City of Atascadero
Request for Proposals for Design, Provide and Install Playground Equipment
REQUEST FOR PR OPOSAL
City of A tascadero
6907 El Cam in o R eal, A tascadero, CA 93422
PROPOSAL DUE: January 25, 2008
CITY OF ATASCADERO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
Design, Provide and Install Playground Equipment
A single playground in the City of Atascadero
The City of Atascadero is soliciting proposals from qualified vendors to design, provide
and install play equipment for a play area as outlined herein. The enclosed document
identifies the budget ceiling for the project.
BACKGROUND
The City of Atascadero is interested in the installation of play equipment and play areas
in the Paloma Creek Park and in providing new equipment with greater play value to
meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act, and Consumer Products
Safety Commission guidelines.
SCOPE OF WORK
The City seeks to contract for the design, provision and installation of all play
equipment, related disability access surfacing, surfacing material and other necessary
improvements to complete a new playground at the Paloma Creek Park site. Bidders
must be prepared to comply with all state, federal and local requirements for play
equipment.
PROPOSAL PROCESS
The proposal process will consist of a written presentation (10 copies) and an potential
oral presentation for a selected number of proposers at a later date. The following shall
be included in your written proposal:
1. A scaled drawing for the park site showing proposed equipment, surfacing,
accessibility access, concrete header if necessary and other necessary
improvements to provide a completed playground. Design requirements for the
site are attached. The bidder will be responsible for verifying exact conditions
and dimensions in the field.
2. A storyboard or folder showing proposed equipment (one copy only).
3. A breakdown of cost of: equipment; installation of equipment; installation of new
surfacing material (in necessary) critical path material to satisfy federal ADA
standards, and other necessary improvements as shown in the criteria for site or
determined to be necessary by the contractor for a complete job.
PLAYGROUND REQUIREMENTS
The proposed playgrounds must conform to and meet the following guidelines:
• ASTM 1292 -Impact Attenuation of Safety Surfaces
• H ASTM F 1487 -01 -Safety Performance Specifications for Playground
Equipment for Public Use
• ASTM 1951 -Method to Test Accessibility of Safety Surfacing for Playgrounds
• CPSC Publication 325 -Handbook for Public Playground Safety
• Play structures must be age appropriate with the proper signage
• All structures shall be designed and installed to facilitate future relocation while
maintaining the structural integrity
• All products shall bear the certification seal of International Play Equipment
Manufacturers Association (IPEMA) and shall meet of exceed ADA "Final
Accessibility Guidelines for Play Area."
IMPORTANT, COST PROPOSALS MUST BREAK OUT COSTS AS DESCRIBED TO
CLEARLY IDENTIFY COST BY ELEMENTS BELOW:
• Design costs.
• Equipment costs.
• Installation of equipment.
• Installation of surfacing material.
• Cost of other site improvements required.
4. A brief description of the proposed schedule and how the project would be
organized.
5. A City of Atascadero Business License is required upon approval of proposal.
6. The installing contractor must be certified by the National Playground Safety
Institute and have a current California State General Contractor's License A or B
and a certification (D-34) for playground installation.
7. A completed audit by a CPSI using forms acceptable to the City of Atascadero.
Contractor Statement of Qualifications/Experience
A complete description of capability and history of the CONTRACTOR should be
included. History of similar projects completed within the last three years, including
project cost and client contact information. CONTRACTOR must posses a current and
appropriate California State Contractors License to perform the work proposed. Provide
the number and type of all licenses held.
References
Proposals should include a brief history and introduction of the company or firm, and the
firm's understanding of the services to be performed. Provide a list of at the last three
public or private references for whom have provided product/services similar to those
proposed. References are to include agency, address, contact person, title, phone
number.
EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS
A panel of City of Atascadero staff and appointed Community Committee members will
review the written proposals and hear the oral presentation. The City will negotiate a
final design and contract with the vendor rated first for the project.
Overall responsiveness to the Request for Proposals is an important factor in the
evaluation process.
Evaluation of proposals will be based on:
• Responsiveness to the RFP and the criteria for the site;
• Equipment designs and concepts presented;
• Originality and creativity;
• Safety;
• Overall play value of the design and equipment proposed;
• Durability and ease of maintenance of the equipment proposed;
• Ability to meet budget, although cost will not be the sole deciding factor;
• Ability to put together a design and construction system which will be able
to perform all aspects of the project, possess appropriate California
contractor's license, and can meet the insurance requirements;
• Ability of proposed design to comply with the requirements of the
Americans with Disabilities Act and the Consumer Products Safety
Council as well as International Playground Equipment Measure
Association Guidelines, and the degree to which the design would allow
participation by those with various disabilities;
• Compatibility of design with overall park setting; and
• Reasonableness of suggested schedule. Schedule should assume award
of contract approximately thirty (30) days after oral presentation with
submittal of necessary bonds and insurance following award before a
notice to proceed is given.
Final award will be made by the City Council. No other officer or agent may obligate or
bind the City.
PROPOSAL DEADLINE
The deadline for receiving proposals is 5:00 p.m. on January 25, 2008. Proposals
should be signed by an authorized individual to bind the firm, and must be valid for at
least 90 days.
Please submit 10 copies of the proposal to:
Geoff English
Public Works Deputy Director
City of Atascadero
6907 EI Camino Real
Atascadero, CA 93422
SCHEDULE
• Request for Proposals mailing by December 14, 2007.
• Proposals must be received no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, January 25,
2008.
• Presentation approximately February 6, 2008.
• Contract(s) Award(s) approximately February 26, 2008.
• Preferred installation period will be March -June 2008.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
For questions, please contact:
Jennifer Fanning
Community Services Supervisor
City of Atascadero
(805) 470-3426
jfanning@atascadero.org
Information Required for Submittal of a Request for Proposal
Taxpayer Id#
Representative Name Title
Address
City State Zip Code
Phone Number ( ) Cell Number ( )
E-mail:
List the last three clients who purchased playground equipment.
Aqencv Name
Contract Amount
Type of Equipment
Contact Person
Agency Name
Contract Amount _
Type of Equipment
Contact Person
Agency Name
Contract Amount _
Type of Equipment
Phone ( )
Phone ( )
Contact Person Phone ( )
DESIGN CRITERIA FOR PALOMA CREEK PARK PLAYGROUND
11665 Viejo Camino, Atascadero CA
SCOPE OF WORK
Surfacing: Currently is a dirt undefined area.
Accessibility: Comply with Americans with Disabilities Act. Providing of
activities for those with disabilities are required.
Play Values Desired: In reviewing the installation of the playground to comply with
the US Playground Guidelines the play area should be
designed for ages 2 to 12 years. Two separate play areas
are desired to offer an area for 5 to 12 years as well as
preschool ages, and swings must be included as a feature in
the play area. The preferred playground would be sports -
theme based.
General Information: This site is the City's sports park, which includes softball
fields, soccer/multi-use fields, and Little League field.
Total allowable budget: $150,000.
Paloma Creek Park
Playground Selection Committee
Company Contact Address Phone #
CALL Program
Dustie Kaczmarek
11700 Viejo Camino
P&R Commission
Paige Buck -Moyer
9547 Durango Rd.
Children's Center
Janice Felde
11850 Viejo Camino
Neighborhood Rep
Bordeaux ApartmentsTheresa Cybulski
9309 Bocina Lane
City Parks Staff
Tom Jamason
6907 EI Camino Real
Ex -officio volunteer Jonalee Istenes 8885 Marchant Ave.
466-0766
461-3330
466-4769
674-3499
464-0461
PL/1YV11�R1D_
PALOMA CREEK PARK PLAYGROUND
Q
CHALLENGERS
.w.wv.ra.v
.N..aai w.� eor
rs ris �s.e
#AS.
.o.nAryr..nw
wrus r+w.
.a.lOO
CASOEPM/t1
:ate
0244M
O!
T-0'
WIMIF
M*h Tung
dave
bang associates,
►a b. IMI Tom► G r.11
PLANTING SYMBOL LEGEND
LAWN AREA, TALL DWARF FESCUE
ORNAMENTAL (LOW GROWING) PERENNIALS,
GROUND COVERS AND SHRUB PLANTING AREA
NO -MOW GRASS
—L — CREEPING RED FESCUE
2" LAYER OF D.G. PAVING.
DIUM ACCENT TREE
RROW SHADE TREE
RGE ACCENT TREE
ADE TREE
EXSTG. BASEBALL FIELD
24 /
32
X,:N
n > �
I ~
16
12 /
>.
Ft
30 15
1§��0:
/ _ n•-�.(�"41, �Tj�j�^�' •:
\ 14
PLAY
47141P.ilk
�0f I R T •'• .,k' ' a; w'' x, -p ,, r „w� �w� �w� ivus- aw
0�k
f ' ,j
11 ,..rr{�c�t' �,•, .-� � s , w ;,� t'a
"riLF
kk94°•'4r�;� rv�`.t e - �� �� y� 1�
x `7 :•� 1 g_,o��`�i�� 1 r,�Q�,,.n.� ;.•r -a L•'1�s�f�'`K�iN��,�,'jF,`i!��1�"c�
f/. 28
34 '•,, Cf.' 4"`
PLAZA � 'z' ' a
a \ 25
<
I�
4 12
m
10 r
u 1<
en
f
BULL PEN
•
FULL BB COURT
27
23
MAINT. YARD
-J
EXSTG.
BLDG.
22
/
JRE GARDE\
I I
I / /
F 27
25
F3%
24
CALL -OUT NOTES
EXSTG. BASEBALL FIELD
Cl
O
oo
I'll
W
m o
m
LANDSCAPE PLAN
1. Existing berm in lawn area.
2. Existing A.C. walkway.
3. Trash can location.
4= Shade structure outline with post location.
7
5= Small BBQ. Location.
33
6. Picnic table location.
7. Existing flagpole monument, to remain=
34
8. Existing lawn area to remain.
IL IL
9. Tree well location.
4
D
10. Group BBQ.
11. Play fountain location.
®
12. Raised planter.
\
13. 2-5 Yr. Play Structure location.
14. Tot Swing location=
J
15. Swing location.
W
16. 5-12 Yr. Play Structure location.
F_
P
17. Safety Zone as required by manufacturer.
18= Play area containment curb (wall).
19. Soil berm (3' tall) with creeping red
fescue (no mow) grass.
20. Backdrop wall for stage.
21. Seating for audience.
22. New chain link fencing with gates.
23. Low retaining wall.
24. Existing c.l= fencing.
25. Existing tree to remain.
26= Machine poured concrete curb (edging).
27. Soil berms for screening and future
garden area.
28. Bench location.
29= 1211 min. depth of Engineered Wood Fiber
(EWF) Play Surfacing.
30. Accessible access ramp location=
31. Raised (1211) stage=
32. Soil berm.
33. Concrete paving.
34. Pavement accent band.
Cl
O
oo
I'll
W
m o
m
LANDSCAPE PLAN
SCALE: 1"=16'-O"
DATLO: NOV. 21, 2007
JOB NO:
SHEET NO.
of
0c)
X < O
<QW
°' °<
z
w
J
IL
�W0)
LU®<
IL IL
OD<
LL
.90
®
®�
R
J
IL I
W
0
F_
P
Ix
IL
SCALE: 1"=16'-O"
DATLO: NOV. 21, 2007
JOB NO:
SHEET NO.
of
0
a
w
PALOMA
CREEK PARK
This is a playground designed for all ages, bringing the sports
theme into the play area.
For the 2-5 year olds there is climbing, sliding and crawl
through spaces which children love.
For ages 5-12 there is rock climbing walls, crescent climbers,
tall spiral slide, 2 -stories of fun and more...
For the children that cannot stop playing video games, we have
something to get off the couch for ... NEOS.
There is something for everyone
City of Atascadero
le
Pffli
�7111I:
w
sl
"1m
11
1
7
RK
�711II_��1:
"1m
49
kt*4 a4a