Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2003-075 RESOLUTION NO. 2003-075 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2002-0072, A MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PD-9 OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT ON APN 049-049-043-002 (805 El Camino Real/Gearhart) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Kelly Gearhart, 6205 Alcantara Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422, (Applicant & Owner), to consider a project consisting of a Planned Development overlay zone change of PD-9 with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and a 33-lot cluster residential tract map with 26 single family lots and a 60-unit senior housing complex, on a 72+/- acre lot located at 805 El Camino Real (APN 049-043-002); and, WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 2003-0054 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is SFR-X (Single Family Residential 1/2 ac minimum), CREC (Commercial Recreation) and OS (Open Space); and, WHEREAS, the site's zoning district is RSF-X (Residential Single Family '/2 ac minimum), LS (Special Recreation) and OS (Open Space) with a Planned Development 9 overlay; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended that a text amendment to PD-9 be approved allowing residential development with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject project application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Master Plan of Development; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a Public Hearing held on October 21, 2003, studied and considered the Master Plan of Development for PD-9, after first studying and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project; and, City of Atascadero Resolution No.2003-075 Page 2 of 26 WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a Public Hearing held on December 9, 2003, studied and considered the Master Plan of Development for PD-9, after first studying and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project,; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Atascadero: SECTION 1. Findings for Approval of Master Plan of Development. The Atascadero City Council finds as follows: 1. The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan and the City's Appearance Review Manual; and, 2. The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Title (Zoning Ordinance)including the PD-9 Ordinance as amended; and, 3. The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use; and, 4. That the proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the character or the immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development; and, 5. That the proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be improved in conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the surrounding neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance with the Land Use Element. SECTION 2. Approval. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session, resolved to approve Conditional Use Permit 2002-0072, A Master Plan of Development for PD-9 subject to the following: 1. EXHIBIT A: Conditions of Approval 2. STAFF REPORT EXHIBIT 1: DeAnza Trail/Alternative Lot Plan Detail 3. EXHIBIT B: Tract Map 4. EXHIBIT C: Master Site Plan Seniors Cottages 5. EXHIBIT D: Master Site Plan Single Family Residential (Sheet 1-2) 6. EXHIBIT E: Senior Cottage Conceptual Landscape and Site Character 7. EXHIBIT F: Senior Cottage Conceptual Elevations and Recreation Center 8. EXHIBIT G: Single Family Conceptual Character Elevations City of Atascadero Resolution No.2003-075 Page 3 of 26 9. EXHIBIT H: Evacuation Plan 10. EXHIBIT I: Graves Creek Bridge 11. EXHIBIT J: UPRR Crossing Bridge 12. EXHIBIT K: Environmental Setback Map 13. EXHIBIT L: Statistical Summary On motion by Council Member Scalise and seconded by Council Member Clay, the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: Council Members Clay, O'Malley, Pacas, Scalise and Mayor Luna NOES: None ABSENT: None ADOPTED: December 9, 2003 CITY ATASCADE0 By: George Ana,Mayor ATTEST: Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., Ci&Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Roy AVIanley, City Att ey City of Atascadero Resolution No.2003-075 Page 4 of 26 EXHIBIT A.Conditions of Approval CUP 2002-0072: PD-9 Master Plan of Development Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program Conditional Use Permit 2002-0072 Planning Services 1. The approval of this use permit shall become final and effective following the end of the referendum period for Zone Change 2003-0069 2. Approval of this Master Plan of Development shall be valid concurrently with the life of Tentative Tract Map 2002-0020 and then indefinitely following final map. The Master Plan of Development approval shall expire and become null and void unless a final map is recorded consistent with the Master Plan of Development. 3. The Community Development Department shall have the authority to approve minor changes to the project the (1) increase the intensity of the project by less than 10%, (2) result in a superior site design or appearance, and/or (3) address a construction design issue that is not substantive to the Master Plan of Development. The Planning Commission shall have the final authority to approve any other changes to the MasterPlan of Development and any associated Tentative Maps. 4. All subsequent Tentative Tract Maps and construction permits shall be consistent with the Master Plan of Development contained herein 5. All exterior elevations of proposed units shall be of equivalent architectural character and quality with the Master Plan of Development as shown in Exhibits E, F and G. 6. All site development shall be consistent with the maximum intensities described in the statistical project summary as shown on Exhibit L. 7. All site work, grading and site improvements shall be consistent with the Master Plan of Development as shown in Exhibits C and D. 8. A landscape and irrigation plan for all common areas, street trees and the equestrian staging area shall be provided as part of the subdivision tract improvement plans. Landscape plans for the senior cottages may be deferred until building permits 9. Street trees shall be provided on all streets with 50-foot on-center spacing. 10. Vehicular barriers that permit pedestrian and equestrian access shall be provided at all access points to the Salinas River. 11. The approval of this application shall become final, subject to the completion of the conditions of approval,fourteen (14) days following the Planning Commission approval unless prior to the time,an appeal to the decision is filed as set forth in Section 9-1.111(b)of the Zoning Ordinance. 12. Approval of this Tentative Tract Map shall be valid for two years after its effective date. At the end of the period, the approval shall expire and become null and void unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request received prior to the expiration date. 13. The Tract Map shall be subject to additional fees for park or recreation purposes (QUIMBY Act) as required by City Ordinance. City of Atascadero Resolution No.2003-075 Page 5 of 26 Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program Conditional Use Permit 2002-0072 14. The applicant shall record CC&R's for the subdivision subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer, City Attorney and Community Development Director. The CC&R's shall identify the maintenance responsibilities of all private driveways, roads, bridges, sewer facilities, drainage facilities, common parking areas, site lighting, landscape areas, fencing, and other common facilities. The CC&R's shall also state that all exterior colors, exterior materials, and yard fencing shall be consistent with the overall master plan of development. 15. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Atascadero or its agents, officers, and employees against any claim or action brought to challenge an approval by the city, or any of its entities,concerning the subdivision 16. An irrevocable public recreation, open space and public access easement shall be recorded on Lot 33 and clearly noted on the final map. Lot 33 shall be offered for dedication to the City of Atascadero. 17. Twenty foot (20-foot) public access easements shall be recorded across all trail corridors located outside of street right-of-ways, xceot for along the rear of revised lots 1.2.3.4. 5.6. 7 and 8 where a 12-foot easement shall be provided. 18. A Class I trail shall be provided on the east side Road A continuously to Paso Robles Creek 19. The final map shall include the Graves Creek 100-year flood plain boundary within the Lot 33 open space parcel as shown on Exhibit A. 20. A deed restriction shall be recorded against lots 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32 limiting occupancy of dwelling units to persons defined as seniors(55 years of age). 21. Prior to recordation of final map, a 30-year affordable housing deed restrictions shall be recorded consistent with the following table. In-lieu fees for remaining un-built units and fractions of units shall be based on 5.00% of the construction valuation of the market rate unit. Fees shall be paid at time of building permit. Rochelle PD-9 Affordable Housing Plan Inclusionary Housing Council Policy Proposed Difference In-Lieu Fee MFR Units 60 units 20%Affordable 12 units Estimated Valuation 100,000.00 Affordable Distribution 20%Very Low 2.0 units 2 units 0 units 0% 37% Low 5.0 units 5 units 0 units 0% 43% Moderate 5.0 units 5 units 0 units 0% 12.0 units 12 units 0 units 0% $ - $0/MFR unit City of Atascadero Resolution No.2003-075 Page 6 of 26 Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program Conditional Use Permit 2002-0072 Inclusionary Housing Council Policy Proposed Difference In-Lieu Fee SFR Units 26 units 20%Affordable 5 units Estimated Valuation 197,000.00 Affordable Distribution 100% Moderate 5.2 units 5.0 units -0.2 units -4% 5.2 units 5.0 units -0.2 units -4% $ 9.850.00 $470/SFR unit 22. Prior to recordation of final map, the applicant shall enter into a legal agreement with the City to reserve 1/2 of the single family residential units for sale to residents or workers within the City of Atascadero, including the affordable units. The agreement shall include the following provisions: a) The units shall be offered for sale to residents or workers within the City of Atascadero for a minimum of 60-days. During this time period offers may only be accepted from Atascadero residents or workers; b) The applicant shall provide reasonable proof to the City that at least one of the qualified buyers is a resident or worker within the City Limits of Atascadero; c) The Atascadero resident or worker restriction shall apply to the initial sale only; d) The applicant shall identify which units will be reserved;and e) The City Attorney shall approve the final form of the agreement. 23. The emergency services and road maintenance costs of the project shall be 100% funded by the project in perpetuity. The service and maintenance cost may be funded through a benefit assessment district or other mechanism established by the developer subject to City approval. The funding mechanism must be in place prior to or concurrently with acceptance of the any final maps. The funding mechanism shall be approved by the City Attorney,City Engineer and Administrative Services Director prior to acceptance of any final map.The administration of the above mentioned funds and the coordination and performance of maintenance activities shall be by the City. a) All Atascadero Police Department service costs to the project. b) All Atascadero Fire Department service costs to the project. C) All streets, sidewalks, streetlights, street signs, roads, emergency access roads, emergency access gates,and sewer mains within the project. d) All parks,trails, recreational facilities and like facilities. City of Atascadero Resolution No.2003-075 Page 7 of 26 Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program Conditional Use Permit 2002-0072 e) All open space and native tree preservation areas. f) All drainage facilities and detention basins. g) All common landscaping areas, street trees, medians, parkway planters, manufacture slopes outside private yards,and other similar facilities. Mitigation Measures 3.c.1. A bicycle and pedestrian pathway will be provided along the bridge and project driveway to Graves Creek. 3.c.2. A pedestrian and bicycle pathway shall be provide through the project with a connection to Graves Creek and the Salinas River. 3.c.3. The following measures shall be noted on the grading plans and implemented during construction: a) All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall occur at least twice daily with complete coverage, preferably in the late morning and after work is finished for the day. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed water should be used whenever possible. b) All clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation activities shall cease during periods of high winds (i.e. greater than 20 mph averaged over one hour)so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. c) All material transported off-site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. d) The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. e) Permanent dust control measured identified in the approved project revegetation and landscape plans shall be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. f) Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading shall be sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation becomes established. g) All disturbed areas not subject to revegetation shall be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders,jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the APCD. h) All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc.to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. In addition, structural foundations shall be completed as soon as possible following building pad construction. i On-site vehiclespeed shall be limited to 15 mph for any unpaved surface. City of Atascadero Resolution No.2003-075 Page 8 of 26 Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program Conditional Use Permit 2002-0072 j) All unpaved areas with vehicle traffic shall be watered at least twice per day, using non-potable water. k) Streets adjacent to the project site shall be swept daily to remove silt which may have accumulated from construction activities so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust from leaving the site. 1) Wheel washers may be required when significant offsite import or export of fill is involved. m) All dirt stock-pile areas should be sprayed daily as needed. 4.a.1. The developed areas of the project will provide a 50-foot setback from riparian canopy and 100- foot setback due to presence of red-legged frog along Paso Robles Creek and Graves Creek. 4.a.2. The tract map shall include an open space habitat easement along the Salinas River and Graves Creek which will includes the archaeological site CA-SLO-493. 4.a.3. Wildlife Migration Corridors along the Salinas River, Paso Robles and Graves Creeks shall be provides on the final map. 4.a.4. BR/mm-1: Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall retain a qualified biological monitor to supervise all construction activities located within or directly adjacent to sensitive communities including riparian forest, and known and potential wetland areas. The biological monitor shall conduct a brief training session prior to commencement of construction to advise construction personnel on the biological sensitivity of various habitats and discuss various measures for minimizing potential construction-related impacts. The biological monitor shall visit construction zones located within or near sensitive areas at a frequency and duration determined appropriate by the City of Atascadero and based on construction timing and sensitivity of resources at issue. During the periodic site visits,the biological monitor will ensure that identified construction zones and access routes remain clearly marked and restricted areas are avoided. Weekly reports will be prepared by the monitor which document construction activities and associated effects on sensitive biological resources. 4.a.5. BR/mm-2: Avoid indirect disturbance of riparian vegetation, including scattered willows, cottonwoods, and valley and coast live oaks,through implementation of the following measures: a) Immediately prior to construction, retain the biological monitor, or qualified botanist, to clearly mark the dripline area of each tree located outside of, but adjacent to proposed development areas. The dripline area of each tree should be marked with highly visible flagging or construction fencing. b) During construction, avoid all soil disturbance, compaction, and grading activities within, and adjacent to, the associated dripline of each tree. The biological monitor should be retained throughout construction activities to ensure that the identified dripline of each tree remains undisturbed, and to supervise all construction activities adjacent to woodland areas. c) Following project implementation, avoid the use of artificial irrigation in areas located adjacent to or within the associated driplines of all remaining oak trees. Revegetate disturbed areas located near remaining oaks, with appropriate native vegetation to minimize the need for artificial irrigation. City of Atascadero Resolution No.2003-075 Page 9 of 26 Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program Conditional Use Permit 2002-0072 4.a.6. BR/mm-3: Designate permanent riparian setbacks for the Salinas River corridor and Graves Creek corridor to preserve sensitive riparian communities. The setback for the Salinas River should extend from the outer edge of the riparian corridor, and southward 50 feet (Refer to Figures 3 and 4 of Biological Assessment for locations of recommended riparian setbacks). The setback for Graves Creek will extend from the outer edges of the riparian corridor, and upland 100 feet, due to the presence of sensitive species. Permanent riparian setbacks of 100 feet will also be designated for the portion of the Salinas River located west of Graves Creek, and for Paso Robles Creek. 4.a.7. BR/mm-4: If direct disturbance of the southern embankment of the Salinas River, located in the northern portion of the site, cannot be completely avoided, a permit must be obtained from the Corps to discharge dredged or fill material into Waters of the U.S., pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The permit must be obtained from the Corps prior to initiation of any ground disturbance activities in the vicinities of identified drainages. A Streambed Alteration Agreement will also be required from the CDFG for disturbance of any portion of the channel located beneath the top of bank. The applicant should contact the Corps and CDFG well in advance of project implementation to determine specific permitting requirements and mitigation responsibilities associated with disturbance of the identified drainages and associated wetlands. 4.a.8. BR/mm-5: To avoid or minimize indirect impacts to areas qualifying as Waters of the U.S. located down-slope from proposed development areas, including areas associated with the Salinas River and Graves Creek implement the following measures: a) Clearly mark the boundaries of all construction areas using highly visible flagging and construction fencing. Limit all private and construction vehicle traffic to areas located within designated access route and construction areas. b) Implement appropriate erosion control measures during construction and limit construction activities to dry weather to avoid increased surface water runoff and erosion on site, and sedimentation in nearby drainages. Install appropriate erosion control devices (i.e., hay bales, silt fences) around the perimeter of each construction zone and areas experiencing disturbance of the ground surface. Erosion control devices should be checked on a daily basis by construction personnel, and periodically by the biological monitor,to ensure proper function. c) Avoid stockpiling any soil in areas located adjacent to drainages, or in areas that have potential to experience significant runoff during the rainy season. d) Following completion of construction-related activities, immediately revegetate all disturbed and barren areas with appropriate native vegetation to reduce the risk of erosion from the site and sedimentation in adjacent ephemeral drainages. Areas experiencing only temporary disturbance should be replanted with only native species that are characteristic of various habitats of the project area. 4.a.9. BR/mm-6: To reduce the potential for inadvertent release of fuel from construction areas to aquatic habitats, avoid all cleaning and refueling of equipment and vehicles within the vicinities of existing drainages and associated seasonal wetland habitat. Stage and re-fuel vehicles only in appropriately marked construction staging areas. City of Atascadero Resolution No.2003-075 Page 10 of 26 Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program Conditional Use Permit 2002.0072 4.a.10. BR/mm-7: Retain a qualified biologist throughout the duration of construction activities to monitor for California red-legged frog (CRLF), as well as southwestern pond turtle, California horned lizard, western toad, and other sensitive species that have potential to occur in construction zones. The monitor should be pre-approved by the USFWS and CDFG to move CRLF from affected areas to appropriate habitats on-site, but away from construction zones. At a minimum, the CRLF monitor should remain on site throughout the duration of all construction activities that take place within 300 feet of the Graves Creek riparian corridor, due to the presence of a known population of the species. 4.a.11. BR/mm-8: To avoid take of active raptor nests, any necessary tree removals should be conducted between September 15 and February 15, outside of the typical breeding season. If any tree removals are determined to be necessary between February 15 and September 15, a raptor nest survey should be conducted by a qualified biologist prior to project implementation and any planned tree removals. The results of the raptor nest survey should be submitted to CDFG, via a letter report. If the biologist determines that a tree slated for removal is being used by raptors for nesting at that time, construction in the vicinity of the nest should be avoided until after the young have fledged from the nest and achieved independence. If no nesting is found to occur in the vicinity of proposed development,construction activities could then proceed. 4.a.12. BR/mm-10: Any public or private access trails retained or created as part of the proposed project should be limited to pedestrian and equestrian traffic only. Restrict the use of all off-road vehicles and construct appropriate barriers at existing river access points. Post signs at regular intervals along public access points to the river that discuss the sensitivity of the adjacent Salinas River corridor and identify allowable and restricted uses. Signs should primarily be posted along the outer edge of the designated setback for the Salinas River. 5.b.1 Prior to any tract improvement within the areas of CA-SLO-492,493, 1076, and 1077,a Phase 2 Archaeological Report shall be prepared. All future development shall be conform to the required mitigations of the Phase 2 study. The sites shall be fenced until mitigation is complete. 5.b.2. A Phase 3 mitigation plan shall be developed for all work proposed in CA-SLO-492, 493, 1076, and 1077. 5.b.3. A deed disclosure shall be included on included on any future lots that cross sites CA-SLO-492, 493, 1076, and 1077 notify owner of the possibility of underlying archaeological deposits. 5.b.4. If human remains are discovered during construction all work shall cease immediately and the Atascadero Community Development Department and County Coroner shall be notified by the contractor. No further work shall occur in the area until authorized by the Atascadero Community Development Department. 6.b.1. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall be prepared and approved by the Water Quality Control District prior to the issuance of construction permits. 6.b.2. Erosion/sedimentation and revegetation plans that demonstrates how sensitive riparian areas will be protected from siltation during and after construction shall be included in the construction plans and approved by the City Engineer. 6.b.3. As part of the construction plans, the applicant shall submit a drainage plan which includes the proper design and placement of sediment/greasetraps to prevent the discharge of pollutants. As a condition on the drainage plan, the applicant shall maintain the catch basin/greasetraps on a regular basis to remove pollutants, reduce high pollutant concentrations during the first flush of City of Atascadero Resolution No.2003-075 Page 11 of 26 Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program Conditional Use Permit 2002-0072 storms, prevent clogging of the downstream conveyance system, and maintain the catch basins sediment trapping capacity. 7.g.1. Prior to approving construction plans, the PUC application for a bridge crossing of the UPRR railroad tracks shall be approved by the PUC. 7.g.2. A second access road and/or an alternative emergency 7.g.3. Prior to final map, the Fire Department shall approve a mitigation plan to provide adequate access to the senior cottages. 8.c.1. All residential portions of the site shall be outside of the Flood Hazard Zone. 8.c.2. As part of the grading plan, the City Engineer shall determine whether the FEMA Flood Hazard Zone is being changed by the project. If so, the applicant shall obtain all necessary approvals from FEMA to change maps prior to approval of construction plans. 8.c.3. All grading and drainage facilities shall be designed consistent with the City's NPDES standards. 8.c.4. A storm water pollution prevention plan shall be approved prior to construction. 11.a.1. The project shall provide a 100-foot noise setback buffer with dense landscaping plantings and evergreen trees along the UPRR frontage. Reconfiguration of building sites on lots 23 and 24 will be required. 11.a.2. Disclose to potential buyers that 24-hour average noise levels may exceed the recommended limits established by the City of Atascadero. 11.a.3. Advise buyers that noise levels during train passbys will be very loud, potentially annoying and perhaps startling 11.a.4. Advise buyers that noise levels due to operation of trucks, forklifts and loading operations at the Home Depot commercial center will frequently be loud and potentially annoying. 11.a.5. Locate outdoor living spaces out of direct line-of-site of railroad and Home Depot commercial center. Fire Department Conditions 24. All fire hydrants and access roads to be installed prior combustible construction to take place. 25. Relocate fire hydrants w/consultation w/fire dept. re: possible reduction on number of hydrants required. 26. Automatic Fire Sprinklers required for senior housing portion of project. 27. Provide for secondary emergency access according to the following: aprovide a plans that shows and describes the installation/construction for evacuation of City of Atascadero Resolution No.2003-075 Page 12 of 26 Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program Conditional Use Permit 2002-0072 residents. The plan shall depict safe routing across the Union Pacific Railroad to the west side. Location of access point shall be midway into senior residential portion of project. b) Show on plan a dedicated easement for possible future secondary multi use access to be used by vehicles, pedestrian, bike and equestrian traffic that facilitates use of the SLOCOG access plan. This dedicated easement plan shall show routing to the North, Northeast direction from the senior housing portion of the project. Residents within proposed project shall have full deed disclosure of said easement. City Council Conditions 28. The master plan of development shall incorporating the revised trail corridor#2 and revised lot plan as shown on Staff Report Exhibit 1. 29. Improvement plans shall be reviewed by Bill Obermeyer(748-9009)and Myra Douglas (466-8061) for approval of the location and length of the fencing along trail corridor#2. Any disagreements regarding the location and length of the fencing along trail corridor#2 shall be resolved by the City Council. -end of conditions- City of Atascadero Resolution No.2003-075 Page 13 of 26 Trail Corridor 1 Trail Corridor 2 Required by City Council condition #28 f , d :S * S Illi Equestrian staging area Connection to AMWC's DeAnza trail corridors City of Atascadero Resolution No.2003-075 Page 14 of 26 Staff Report Exhibit 1: DeAnza Trail/Alternative Lot Plan Detail Rp Trail!Alternative Lot Plan Detail Add 12400t wide fenced Widen and De nza trail at relooate lots top of bank next to trail s Sir Lor i as T ss h � is EXHIBIT B:Tract Map CUP 2002-0072: Development "A' \ \\\ +7� As, ij I/L A Ord to be added to1 ; , `- �•7�- � C '`�, i�' w ' '` � Graves Creek ill open space • F�"4"� 'No Nit Illlill�l��ll�l� �1amended by �,���� fLotlayout � ,\ condition,,,,� � �1 , 1 .-.V s JI. - �IIII1111IIIIW In 1IllilllNllllr y ., OR 1p�( •�� J �•, �� r'C 'a�Y�,�IJi��.N r� ,s",i1_ �Y E�✓11 ���;(�'(1��I1r hi11'�It� City of Atascadero Resolution No.2003-075 Page 16 of 26 EXHIBIT C:Master Site Plan Seniors Cottages CUP 2002-0072: PD-9 Master Plan of Development IZ NN it t Entire Seniors /i�'r+ilr rpl;� i � :/ � �' i � �"� � -�__�___• site to be landscaped. + ��/r(WINIf r r Jr n I Class 1 trail ', Mrr +n ► �'- I with 20-foot II +r 111 + II public access 1 + /1 Y rPf'lIr( ++ r 'I �V"• h •� 1� easement Nq �Jr 4 b Y rrrt It ki iI a 1�111 � `•'C ' -�V �° 'X Ia ill it / '� 1 �� ' g � • � -- �4 Iq/ �� � 1, � � •fir -�„" �- __'_ -- � �n •�' ��`' � ��i 6IMF it Graves Creek bridge with Class 1 trail Q% oil w �\�+� 11 f" t C"~\•4 \I .. ^\ � �1i';'aeL�.t '� ��f11�i•+ i ' ! City of Atascadero Resolution No.2003-075 Page 17 of 26 EXHIBIT D:Master Site Plan Single Family Residential(Sheet 1) CUP 2002-0072: PD-9 Master Plan of Development Vis''-- ~ 1♦1a� jl►►� 111 I� 1 , —�_ � _. '• •�I .•; �' _ ► ii ► _ hI Class 1 trail } "1 f /r ► ♦�1� � .; r with 20-foot ► public access easement I ��: � ► � rr � rr t f �—' err Y� iI • � �,.t;,. t ..��� ! \ I�!� i' ��if�i��♦ Fill slopes to r i a t - ♦ ► • ty//� be landscaped I nr 1 ' ► I iii � - i�•i r ► r / � I f � I i I 1 . J ���� t l ♦ ►♦��! it ► (� ��\\ i I trit;t� Lot layout >� (• ► I� ►►� ►► t` __ `/' '4rtr r r amended by u" I � rt ► ►� I l t \c ; i i Itr u r/ i�i� condition 028 II ► t ► �` ` i ►i \\``tt\�\� \t\\ �` �� �: �r ��►'r��`�ei�tllrr It I\N it It l ►I�►� 1T "C—\ .\`�\ ' ♦ i n,kbi Ili Y�sr�1 It�1 i , i � iflt ff ii i lift i/1 jiiff City of Atascadero Resolution No.2003-075 Page 18 of 26 EXHIBIT D:Master Site Plan Single Family Residential(Sheet 2) CUP 2002-0072: PD-9 Master Plan of Development tita r _ 1111 /,f— ,Z( \ '+� 1 i i - 1 ! , r� 1 ' z,• r Equestrian Staging area * and future ,� r I �, � i �• �. .;�:, rrr 1 I � � � 1 ::s • Ir � ., r rr I I public park � �•. , (V t i//ir /i/rrari hl r rirrr4�rr r fit �`_ _.. • �r iii �iii'� I 111 1 1 _ r i rrr rfiii ii1�1� Lot layout 1111 t I amended b 1 1 . 1 dll�t Y r'�Ir jrt II 1i�11`� condition#28 �Irr 1 ;r rrrlrilrrlly� 1 X111 1 r►r !! yr 1 r �� 1 I Ip 1 _ i'i 1�_.��rr i1 � �: ; r/ wr rh M + �—•—•--• .1 �.�,.---, i r lr�r rriJ i. . 1 ����� I , i ■�j _� �• Illt� r �! I If I •a ` ( `` ,11� 1 �11 , INr (ra me no City of Atascadero Resolution No.2003-075 Page 19 of 26 EXHIBIT E:Senior Cottage Conceptual Landscape and Site Character CUP 2002-0072: PD-9 Master Plan of Development � r f_ 3 iz Y; �F I yll r� } t 6 a A ` C 3 X§ 3( d s I City of Atascadero Resolution No.2003-075 Page 20 of 26 EXHIBIT F:Senior Cottage Conceptual Elevations and Recreation Center CUP 2002-0072: PD-9 Master Plan of Development p C -t�fc Typical senior cottage elevations WQ � N § 9 c 3 � E. t., sr r' Recreation center elevation City of Atascadero Resolution No.2003-075 Page 21 of 26 EXHIBIT G:Single Family Conceptual Character Elevations CUP 2002-0072: PD-9 Master Plan of Development The following elevations represent conceptual architecture of single family houses with a Mediterranean character. Actual elevations will vary. gg s F I�V - `I T uh III w 3 �m EXHIBIT H:Evacuation Plan CUP 2002-0072: l: VO I Ai /�' i'1 �� \._. "•ane t'�E+''�,,'��+� y H�� ���-� ,tl�►its\�;����,�,' \:` ,r i �}!' ILI �.,. ��►1%��� to � /J all imp tell *Iwo r WOW Qft 111111111: x� � 111111111: ...,� IIIIIIIIi � � �" ' ` ¢r�►` ra��1 �wui,� r ��• y • �`�!� A II M5 �Illy�::��E1 a; 441%� �►�ii�rrt�l�rl}�st�r'��r._ I If City of Atascadero Resolution No.2003-075 Page 23 of 26 EXHIBIT 1:Graves Creek Bridge CUP 2002-0072: PD-9 Master Plan of Development i � iE✓'C .� E � ( _ 1 ,S, k j-+� }i' �' r S It t ► n 1 TT ai; i L F 1_i_ I tia; 1 It 11 i t ( r T f II F yi- .t, t i-. i i Tn ----------------- 14 to r t r s Jr/14 t{ �i 1! Ti ii a t �a,t i;ti T t4 4 p \ i 6 : � �����I• � 3037��l 411ff C ��� ai�ii, �ikn�ii�g i�;��ai a''F= 1f r ---- _' f u:■-�.1 ������ /15u'diri�l�i����'�� � ■■�ii � yl. p,..�l'.�w•�':r I � i� 1((�11I i9 �l>�tiin: 3�i� � - � ►.i. �EEp111�_�i��l��il w 15��• ��liyi1l1l1i��.;��E`�� f 11� ��11�11 IJ11 I I�,I#111��f���l�� � ���� ■II 1�.�FII',„1;�r��+l 41 nli4riil�Ili��� '�i ■ — 1,•� gl�i2i��a`ii �i. � n',�;Pflf�\ _i����■ �I � � II e 1��� I 1 e s �n 1 w kkkrI(pny7I n 1I n 1 limn lu r� n mm momm It IN All .1019 I 111111 AI 1 11,1({. ■1.,I{1 y 1 1,����{{11,I {Y 1. ■ ■� R� it ILII JDI a �a ; i' �'_� f' -�— \il. 11 h'/ f 1� ■ ■ �■ InNil 0 ������ Di'�illl�iirl��1 � �ii G i�i■�' �_ � ■■ -I \ n M. ' i ,., ,�''.'�` �►"~�+�..'� his �'�� r;, }dyi'. All l fl . '14.1-�'%./ .`�� ►'.✓ �' t/t� i�*:�%�,y,R IN i , XH amended by ond 111111111: �� i�;�` `��1 t� �►%�,��;;s''' ��. ; „r '4 40,r, # a t� i!` �, lad►'!'"'' \ wl •t� ���, f r 1 City of Atascadero Resolution No.2003-075 Page 26 of 26 EXHIBIT L: Master Plan of Development Statistical Summary CUP 2002-0072: PD-9 Master Plan of Development LOT NUMBER: ACRES UNITS: COVERED PARKING STALLS: DENSITY(UNITS/ACRE): LOT 27 4.40 ACRES 12 .UNITS 12 COVERED PARKING STALLS 9.8 UNITS PER ACRE LOT 28 3.38 ACRES 11 UNITS 11 COVERED PARKING STALLS 9.9 UNITS PER ACRE LOT 29 0.84 ACRES 9 UNITS 9 COVERED PARKING STALLS 10.7 UNITS PER ACRE LOT 30 0.92 ACRES 12 UNITS 12 COVERED PARKING STALLS 13.0 UNITS PER ACRE LOT 31 1.03 ACRES 8 UNITS 8 COVERED PARKING STALLS 7.7 UNITS PER ACRE LOT 32 1.10 ACRES 1 8 UNITS. 8 COVERED PARKING .STALLS 7.2 UNITS PER ACRE TOTAL 11.7 ACRES 60 UNITS 60 COVERED PARKING STALLS 9.7 UNITS/ACRE AVG *LOT 27 - (4) PARKING SPACES *LOT 28 - (30) PARKING SPACES ORIGINAL REMAINDER PARCEL OF LOT 16 0.56 AC PARCEL MAP AT 99-164 75.40 AC LOT 17 0.62 AC PROPOSED (NET) LOT 18 0.72 AC LOT 1 1.23 AC LOT 19 0.43 AC LOT 2 0.46 AC LOT 20 0.37 AC LOT 3 0.38 AC LOT 21 0.42 AC LOT 4 0.32 AC LOT 22 0.30 AC LOT 5 0.48 AC LOT 23 0.34 AC LOT 6 0.49 AC LOT 24 0.79 AC LOT 7 0.45 AC LOT 25 0.83 AC LOT 8 0.54 AC LOT 26 0.62 AC LOT 9 0.35 AC LOT 27 4.41 AC LOT 10 AC LOT 28 3.38 AC LOT i 1 0.40 AC LOT 29 0:84 AC LOT 12 0.48 AC LOT 30 0.92 AC LOT 13 0.52 AC LOT 31 1.03 AC LOT 14 0.54 AC LOT 32 1.10 AC LOT 15 0.49 AC LOT 33 45.90 AC Lot sizes amended by condition #28