HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2002-052 RESOLUTION NO. 2002-052
A RESOLUTION OF THE ATASCADERO
CITY COUNCIL CERTIFYING NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2002-0030
PREPARED FOR ZONE CHANGE 2001-0029, CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 2001-0067, AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2001-0014
(2000 Ferrocarril / Gearhart)
WHEREAS, an application has been received from Kelly Gearhart, 6205 Alcantara
Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422, (Applicant & Owner), to consider a project consisting of a
Planned Development overlay zone change to PD-16 with the adoption of a Master Plan of
Development, and an sixteen-lot cluster residential tract map, on a 31+/- acre lot located at 2000
Ferrocarril Road(APN 049-023-030, 049-291-016, 049-291-005); and,
WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-0030 were
prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA); and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing
following the close of the review period for the Initial Study and Draft Negative Declaration to
consider its adequacy; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a public hearing
held on Tuesday, November 5, 2002, recommended that the City Council certify Mitigated
Negative Declaration 2002-0030,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Atascadero City Council, at a public hearing held on
Tuesday, December 10, 2002, hereby resolves to certify Mitigated Negative Declaration 2002-
0030 based on the following Findings as shown on Exhibit A:
1. The Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA; and,
2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was presented to the Planning Commission, and
the information contained therein was considered by the Planning Commission, prior
to recommending action on the project for which it was prepared; and,
3. The project does not have the potential to create a significant environmental impact;
and,
4. The Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration will be forwarded to the City Council, and
the information therein contained will be considered by the City Council, prior to
taking final action on the project.
City of Atascadero
Resolution No.2002-052
On motion by Council Member Scalise and seconded by Council Member O'Malley, the
foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members O'Malley, Scalise and Mayor Clay
NOES: Council Members Luna and Pacas
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
ADOPTED: December 10, 2002
C '
B
e L. Cl , Sr., Mayor
Attest:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City r
Approved as to form:
() 46 �",/
Roy Panley,'6ty At rney
RECEIVED. D
JUL262
002 O
JI&I L.R010AL0
7 Us County CkA
2918 •• 2978 VI OepuH CITY OF ATAS CADERO
PROPOSED MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION #2002-0030
6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero,CA 93422 805/461-5035
Applicant: Kelly Gearhart, 6205 Alacantara,Atascadero,CA 93422
Project Title: ZCH 2002-0029/CUP 2002-0067/Vesting TTM 2002-0014
Project 2000 Ferrocarril Road(East of Union Pacific Railroad),Atascadero, San Luis
Location: Obispo County APN 049-023-030,049-291-016,049-291-005
Project The proposed project consists of Planned Development Zone Change with a Master Plan of Development
Description: to allow a 16 lot single family residential subdivision with an average minimum lot size of 2.5 acres. One
of the lots will be a 5.76-acre open space lot with an equestrian/pedestrian trail and parking area. The
project will permit the construction of 13 additional single family dwellings. The site has rolling
topography and large flat areas with numerous oak trees and native vegetation. The site is located
between the Salinas River and the Union Pacific Railroad. Access will be provided from a street
extension off of El Camino Real that will require construction of a grade separated railroad crossing. No
water or sewer services are available to the site,and the site will be served by individual wells and septic
systems. The project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation and requires a Planned
Development Overlay for zoning consistency.
General Plan Designation:SE(Suburban Estates)
Zoning District:RS Residential Suburban
Findings:
1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment
2. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals.
3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable.
4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly.
Determination:
Based on the above findings,and the information contained in the initial study 2002-0030(made a part hereof by.
reference and on file in the Community Development.Department),it has been determined that the above project will
not have an adverse impact on the environment when the following proposed mitigation measures are incorporated
into the project(see attachment).
Prepared By: Warren Frace
Date Posted: July 26,2002
Public Review Ends: August 16,2002
Attachments: 1. Mitigation Measures
2. Location Map
3. Site PIan/Tentative Tract Map
rac ZCH 2O 4029.15-bDtD.7$J-02.vmtda v 4 �/
ttin{Date 074602907 A1(
6500 PALMA AVENUE ATASCADERO,CALIFORPIIA 93422 • (805)461-5035 FAX 461-5035
P o.
191a , _ �, 1979
CITY OFATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
Applicant: Kelly Gearhart, 6205 Alacantara,Atascadero,CA 93422
Project Title: ZCH 2002-0029/CUP 2002-0067/Vesting TTM 2002-0014
Project 2000 Ferrocarril Road(East of Union Pacific Railroad),Atascadero, San Luis
Location: Obispo County APN 049-023-030,049-291-016,049-291-005
Project The proposed project consists of Planned Development Zone Change with a Master Plan of Development
Description: to allow a 16 lot single family residential subdivision with an average minimum lot size of 2.5 acres. One
of the lots will be a 5.76-acre open space lot with an equestrian/pedestrian trail and parking area. The
project will permit the construction of 13 additional single family dwellings. The site has rolling
topography and large flat areas with numerous oak trees and native vegetation. The site is located
between the Salinas River and the Union Pacific Railroad. Access will be provided from a street
extension off of El Camino Real that will require construction of a grade separated railroad crossing. No
water or sewer services are available to the site,and the site will be served by individual wells and septic
systems. The project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation and requires a Planned
Development Overlay for zoning consistency.
General Plan Designation:SE(Suburban Estates)
Zoning District:RS Residential Suburban
Lead Agency Name City of Atascadero
and Address: 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero,CA 93422
Contact Person and Warren Frace
Phone Number: City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Avenue,Room 104
Atascadero,CA 93422
General Plan Residential Suburban Estates(SE) 2.5-10 acre minimum lot size.
Designation:
Zoning: Residential Suburban(RS)2.5-10 acre minimum lot size.
Surrounding Land North: Home Depot Commercial Center PD-9
Uses and Setting:
South: Large lot Rural Residential
West: Union Pacific Railroad
East: Salinas River/Atascadero Mutual Water Company property
Other public None.
agencies whose
approval is required
(e.g.,permits,financing
approval,or participation
agreement)
0726/02 ZCH 2002.0029.IS-MN0.7-25-02.wrtd dcc 0 4 C
.�S CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
Attachment 7
Mitigation Measures
3.b.1. The project shall be conditioned to comply with all applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of
fugitive dust(PM-10)as contained in section 6.4 of the Air Quality Handbook. All site grading and
demolition plans notes shall list the following regulations:
A All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering
shall occur at least twice daily with complete coverage,preferably in the late morning and after work is finished
for the day.
B. All clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation activities shall cease during periods of high winds(i.e.greater
than 20 mph averaged over one hour)so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust.
C. All material transported off-site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive
amounts of dust.
D. The area disturbed by clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation operations shall be minimized so as to
prevent excessive amounts of dust.
E. Permanent dust control measured identified in the approved project revegetation and landscape plans shall be
Implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities.
F. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading shall
be sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation becomes established.
G. All disturbed areas not subject to revegetation shall be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders,jute
netting,or other methods in advance by the APCD.
H. All roadways,driveways,sidewalks,etc.to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. In addition,
structural foundations shall be completed as soon as possible following building pad construction.
I. On-site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 mph for any unpaved surface.
J. All unpaved areas with vehicle traffic shall be watered at least twice per day,using non-potable water.
K. Streets adjacent to the project site shall be swept daily to remove silt which may have accumulated from
construction activities so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust from leaving the site.
L. Wheel washers may be required when significant offsite import or export of fill is involved.
3.c.1. A multi-use Class I bicycle,pedestrian and equestrian trail will be provided from Chico Road to the Salinas
River and along the shoulder of the new proposed street.
3.c.2. Large canopy shade trees shall be provided along street frontages to minimize urban heat build-up.
4.e.1. All construction within the drip lines of native trees shall be consistent with the mitigation requirements of
the 5/13/02 arborist report.
4.e.2. A tree fencing protection plan shall be submitted with construction plans and installed prior to permit
Issuance.
4.e.3. All tree removals shall be mitigated consistent with the requirements of the Atascadero Native Tree
Ordinance.
4.e.4. An arborist shall be retained monitor construction,mitigations,and overall tree health.
8.c.1. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)will be required to be approved by the RWQCB prior to
construction.
11.a.1. Deed disclosures shall be recorded against all lots notifying potential buyers that noise levels on
their property will most likely exceed the recommended limits established by the City of
Atascadero when trains are present on the tracks. Advise buyers that noise levels during train
passbys will be very loud,potentially annoying,and perhaps startling.
11.a.2. Locate outdoor living spaces out of direct line-of-sight with the railway to the extent possible.
U�17
07r26102 ZCH 2002-0029.IS-MN0.7-25-02.wr d dcC
v .
CITY OFATASCADERO
INITTAL STUDY
11.a.3. Installed landscaped berms around outdoor living areas that have direct line-of-sight with the
railway.
11.a.4. Construct all housing will stucco siding and concrete or the roofing materials to reduce interior
noise.
11.a.5. Minimize windows that have direct line of sight with railway.
07126102 ZCH 2002.0029.IS-MND3-25-02.wm49oe U D
gz
CITY OFATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
Attachment 2
Location Map
2000 Ferrocarril
Atascadero, CA
Project Site
emazoneshp �` `■■
A ■
X500
�■ ■■
�ae line creeksshl� ■
■
Ry boundarles.sh; ■ ■
i
■■..
'cay Lin,tt:J _ ■. ..........
las cAdata basemr e ■ ■..■■. ■■■" ■ ■
�Rural ResWet i ■` ■"•
RE:Rurat Est ■
:Suburbar '� e
R•Z:Singh S tc� C `
R•Y:Singh
♦♦
R•X:Sing 14
ID ■
R:Medturt T KLY � 7'.r ■■
HDR:High Dr r$' �•►"+ ■■
oC:Generalr µ' x3 ■ _
SC:Service C r ✓ �' "' c / •■■� .■' '■ ...
MU:balxed USd
• fi e4 ^ r. ■•uy ..■'
,7 saw
CPK:Comma••- �,� � ' + r
��. IND:Industria C� -
CREC:Comrr > s
REC:PubloF Q� t
OS:Open Sp fQ
A.Agriculture t
PUB:Public F
Unineotporatr: O
Ilachange .
■ i :^� -�>
RighFot•bV
's
x`aseaderobasems � x '`
3ospere.shp • '` �H„ t't `tt - sM r :.. ' 'c
MODERATEL ■ e ' ' •i Y�� t:t
NOTWELLO ■ • ■ • ac. ;'
NOT W ELLT �
VERY POOR . • ��
7-1 VERY POOR ; `• t u�<\`Va�t\ ;_
0j2
07/26/02 ZCH 2002-0029.IS-MND.7.25-02.wmLdac
r � 1
'moi � :.H --'=���ID .(q► _ ���.
�'��•S • � •vi r'O I u
• �j 1. I�rp� � ,
�y- :�,
�lyf.
4
.+ t��,�� � ��� ;;�'•.Wil_ ,�/ ��i
�wp 0,4%
CIS
olk
�
•.c.+ •
o r
CITY OFATASCADERO
s
IM71A.L STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,involving at least
one impact that is a".Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture Resources ❑ Air Quality
❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology/Soils
❑ Hazards&Hazardous ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality ❑ Land Use/Planning
Materials
❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population/Housing
❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation/Traffic
❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment,and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
® I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will
not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on.an attached sheet have
been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a"potentially significant effect"or"potentially significant
unless mitigated"impact on the environment,but at least one effect 1)has been adequately analyzed in an
earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures
based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT is required,but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there
WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects(a)have been
analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards
and(b)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION,
including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
Warren Frac Dat
Community Development Director
07126102 ZCH 2002-0029.MMN0.7.25-02.mrd di•
CITY OFATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except"No Impact"answers that are adequately supported by the
information sources a Lead Agency cites following each question. A"No Impact"answer is adequately
supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the
one involved(e.g.the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A"No Impact"answer should be explained
where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards(e.g.the project will not expose
sensitive receptors to pollutants,based on a project-specific screening analysis).
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved,including off-site as well as on-site,cumulative as
well as project-level,indirect as well as direct,and construction as well as operational impacts.
3) "Potentially Significant Impact"is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If
there are one or more"Potentially Significant Impact"entries when the determination is made,an EIR is
required.
4) "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated"applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures
has reduced an effect from"Potentially Significant Impact"to a"Less than Significant Impact." The Lead
.Agency must describe the mitigation measures,and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than
significant level(mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses,"may be cross-referenced).
5) Earlier analyses may be used where,pursuant to the tiering,program EIR,or other CEQA process,an effect has
been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses
are discussed.in Section XVII at the end of the checklist.
6) Lead Agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references information sources for potential
impacts(e.g.general plans,zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document
should,where appropriate,include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A
source list should be attached. Other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
07/26/02 ZCH 2002-0029.IS-61ND.7.2542.wrd.d�-
CITY OFATASCADERO
IM77AL STUDY
Initial Study 2002-0030 Potentlatly Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significantwith Significant Impact
Zone Change 2002-0029 Impact Mitigation Impact
Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation
Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014
2000 Ferrocarril Road
1.AESTHETICS--Would the project:
a)Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ED ® 0
b)Substantially damage scenic resources, including, F n ® n
but not limited to,trees, rock outcroppings,and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?
c)Substantially degrade the existing visual character ® El
or quality of the site and its surroundings?
d)Create a new source of substantial light or glare that ® F]
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
SOURCES: Project Description, site plan, site visit
DISCUSSION:
1 a./b./c.The site does not meet the criteria for being a scenic vista,however it is a large natural area that
Js partially visible from public streets. The project will involve large residential lots with 2.5 acre
minimum and the houses will be subject to design guidelines. Site improvements will be limited
to a single rural character street that will require the removal on one native tree. The project will
be consistent with the character of surrounding development. This impact is considered less
than significant.
1.d. Consistent with City policy street lighting will not be required on the street to minimize light and
glare impacts. Lighting will be limited decorative exterior residential lighting which is not a source
of significant light and glare impacts. This impact is considered less than significant.
2.AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: In determining
whether impacts to agricultural resources are
significant environmental effects,lead agencies may
refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and
Site Assessment Model (1997)prepared by the
California Dept.of Conservation as an optional model
to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and
farmland.Would the project:
a)Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,or n F VmN
Farmland of Statewide Importance(Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency,to non-agricultural use?
b)Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use,or a Q
Williamson Act contract?
c)Involve other changes in the existing environment F] F] n
which,due to their location or nature, could result in
07126/02 Page 1 ZCH2O02-0029.IS-MND.7.25-02.wrrf.do(
CITY OFATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
Initial Study 2002-0030 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Zone Chan a 2002-0029 significant Significant with significant Impact
g Impact Mitigation Impact
Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation
Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014
2000 Ferrocarril Road
conversion of Farmland,to non-agricultural use?
SOURCES: Cal. Dept. of Conservation maps, site plan, site visit.
DISCUSSION:
2a. The property is not prime farmland and has never been used for farming. The site has varied
topography, numerous oak trees and native vegetation that would have to be significantly
impacted to accommodate agricultural activities. This is considered a non impact.
2b. The site is not under Williamson Act Contracts. This is considered a non-impact.
2c. The are not any adjacent farmlands that could be impacted by the development of this site. This
is considered a non-impact.
3.AIR QUALITY--The significance criteria
established by the Air Quality Control District in its
CEQA Guidelines may be relied upon to make the
following determinations.Would the project:
a)Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ❑ ❑ ® ❑
applicable air quality plan?
b)Violate any air quality standard or contribute F]substantially to an existing or projected air quality . ❑ ❑
violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ❑
any criteria pollutant for which the project region is Lni ❑ ❑
non-attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard (including releasing
emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
e)Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial F]number of people?
SOURCES:Air Pollution Control District(APCD)CEQA Air Quality Handbook,project description
DISCUSSION:
3a. The project is located in a non-attainment air quality basin where any new development
contributes incrementally to air quality impacts. The project will result in a net increase of 13
single family residences with a net increase of 130 vehicle trips per day. This impact is
considered less than significant.
3b. During the grading and construction phase the potential exists to generate air borne dust(PM-
10)in violation of APCD standards. The following mitigation measure will reduce this-impact to a
level of less than significant.
MITIGATION MEASURES
3.b.1. The project shall be conditioned to comply with all applicable District regulations pertaining to the
07a6ro2 Paget •_tJ�
ZCH 2002-0029.tS-&IND.7-25-02.wmLdo.. _
J CITY OF ATASCADERO
1'iVITL4L STUDY
Initial Study 2002-0030 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significantwith Significant Impact
Zone Change 2002-0029 Impact Mitigation Impact
Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation
Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014
2000 Ferrocarril Road
control of fugitive dust(PM-10)as contained in section 6.4 of the Air Quality Handbook. All site
grading and demolition plans notes shall list the following regulations:
A. All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of
dust. Watering shall occur at least twice daily with complete coverage,preferably in the late
morning and after work is finished for the day.
B. All clearing,grading, earth moving, or excavation activities shall cease during periods of
high winds (i.e.greater than 20 mph averaged over one hour)so as to prevent excessive
amounts of dust.
C. All material transported off-site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent
excessive amounts of dust.
D. The area disturbed by clearing,grading,earth moving,or excavation operations shall be
minimized so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust.
E. Permanent dust control measured identified in the approved project revegetation and landscape
plans shall be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing
activities.
F. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after
initial grading shall be sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation
becomes established.
G. All disturbed areas not subject to revegetation shall be stabilized using approved chemical soil
binders,jute netting,or other methods in advance by the APCD.
H. All roadways,driveways,sidewalks,etc.to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. In
addition,structural foundations shall be completed as soon as possible following building pad
construction.
1. On-site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 mph for any unpaved surface.
J. All unpaved areas with vehicle traffic shall be watered at least twice per day,using non-potable
water.
K. Streets adjacent to the project site shall be swept daily to remove silt which may have
accumulated from construction activities so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust from leaving
the site.
M. Wheel washers maybe required when significant offsite import or export of fill is involved.
3c. The project will result in a net increase of 13 single family residences with a net increase of 130
vehicle trips per day. This impact is considered less than significant with the following mitigation
measures.
MITIGATION MEASURES
3.c.1. A multi-use Class I bicycle,pedestrian and equestrian trail will be provided from Chico Road to the Salinas
River and along the shoulder of the new proposed street.
3.c.2: Large canopy shade trees shall be provided along street frontages to minimize urban heat build-up.
Page 3
07126102 ZCH 2002.0029.1S411,10.7-25-02.wri
CITY OFATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
Initial Study 2002-0030 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Zone Chan a 2002-QQ29 Significant Signiticantwith significant Impact
g Impact Mitigation Impact
Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation
Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014
2000 Ferrocarril Road
3d/e. The project will not be located in an area of substantial pollution concentrations nor will it be a
source of odors. These are considered non impacts.
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES --Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ® ❑
through habitat modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate,sensitive,or special status species in
local or regional plans, policies,or regulations,or by
the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian ® a
habitat or other sensitive natural community identified
in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by
the California Department of Fish and Game or US
Fish and Wildlife Service?
c)Have a substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act(including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool,coastal, etc.)through direct removal,
filling, hydrological interruption,or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any ❑
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or
with established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors,or impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
e)Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources,such as a tree El
preservation policy or ordinance?
f)Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat F-1 1:1 F1
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local,regional,or state habitat
conservation plan?
SOURCES: 11/20/01 Kit Fox/Biological Survey by Sierra Delta Corp., 11/27/01 Botanical Survey by
Sierra Delta Corp., 5/13/02 Arbor Tree Surgery Arborist Report, Project description,site visit, Land Use
Element EIR, GIS Maps
DISCUSSION:
4a/b. A botanical and biological survey was conducted of the site in November 2001 to identifythe
existance of sensitive species of plants or animals within the project area. No sensitive plant
species where found on the site. Impacts to live oaks is covered below. The site is within the
range of the San Joaquin kit fox which is listed and protected as a rare species. The site survey
07!26!02 Page 4 „�
ZCH 2002-0029.IS-MND.7-25-02.vmd.
qu
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
Initial Study 2002-0030 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significantwith Significant Impact
Zone Change 2002-0029 Impact Mitigation Impact
Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation
Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014
2000 Ferrocarril Road
found no kit fox habitat features. The report concludes that development of the site will have no'
Impact on the kit fox or its habitat. This impact is considered to be less than significant.
4c. Although the site a adjacent to the Salinas River it is located on a raised plain that is above the
flood plains. The site was used historically as a quarry and has been significantly altered form its
original condition. There are no streams,drainage courses or wetlands that exist within the
project area. This is considered a non-impact.
4d. Based on the conclusion of the biological survey development of the site will not impact wildlife
movements or migratory corridors.
4e. There are 331 native oak trees on the project site. Of those trees 15 native Live Oak trees on
the site that will be impacted by the development of the project. Of the impacted trees, only one
needs to be removed and the impacts to the remaining 14 trees can be mitigated and preserved.
This impact is considered less than significant with mitigation.
MITIGATION MEASURES
4.e.1. All construction within the drip lines of native trees shall be consistent with the mitigation requirements of
the 5/13/02 arborist report.
4.e.2. A tree fencing protection plan shall be submitted with construction plans and installed prior to permit
issuance.
4.e.3. All tree removals shall be mitigated consistent with the requirements of the Atascadero Native Tree
Ordinance.
4.e.4. An arborist shall¢e retained monitor construction,mitigations,and overall tree health.
4f. There are no adopted conservation plans within the project vicinity. This is considered a non-
impact.
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES --Would the project:
a)Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource as defined in
'15064.5?
b)Cause a substantial adverse change in the ❑ E rVS/1 D
significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to
'15064.5?
c)Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological EJ 1:1 n
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d)Disturb any human remains, including those interred F] F VN
outside of formal cemeteries?
SOURCES: Phase 1 Archaeological Assessment CA Signer&Associates 11/27/01, Project description,
site visit, Land Use Element EIR
DISCUSSION:
5a-d. The project site was used a quarry by the railroads at the late 19 'century and again in the
1930's. Consequently any archaeological resources that may have existed on the site have been
Page 5 .'
07/16/02 ZCH 2002-0029.I&MND.7.25-02.x
CITY OFATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
Initial Study 2002-0030 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant with Significant Impact
Zone Change 2002-0029 Impact Mitigation Impact
Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation
Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014
2000 Ferrocarril Road
removed. Although the site is within a larger area known to have significant archaeological
resources development of this site will not impact any archaeological resources due to past
mining operations. This impact is considered less than significant.
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS--Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial ® FJ
effects, including the risk of loss, injury,or
death Involving:
I)Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as EJ D
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State
Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication
42.
ii)Strong seismic ground shaking? a ❑
iii)Seismic-related ground failure, including ® ❑
liquefaction? El
iv)Landslides? E-1 ❑ ❑
Cul
1421
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of f—t'
topsoil? L_J
Ei
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, E El ® ❑
or that would become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on-or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading,subsidence, liquefaction or
collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil,as defined in Table
18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code(1994),creating
substantial risks to life or property?
e)Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the F] ® ❑
use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal
systems where sewers are not available for the
disposal of wastewater?
SOURCES: Geotechnical Engineering and Percolation Report Buena Geotechnical Services 12/19/02,
Project description,site visit,Atascadero Zoning Ordinance
DISCUSSION:
6a. A geotechnical engineering report has been prepared for the project including each building site.
The primary threat to wood frame single family structures involves soil failures and liquefaction.
Uri
07a6ro2 Page 6 ZCH 2002.0029 JS-MN0.7-2s02.wrr
4-71 CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
Initial Study 2002-0030 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significantwith Significant Impact
Zone Change 2002-0029 Impact Mitigation Impact
Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation
Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014
2000 Ferrocarril Road
The risk of liquifaction on the site has been determined to be low based on soil density. This
impact is considered to be less than significant.
6b. The site is relatively flat with limited grading required. The risk of erosion is low. This impact is
considered less than significant.
6c. The soils have been found to be suitable for construction. This impact is less than significant.
6d. The soil expansion index is very low to low. No impact.
6e. The project will be served by on site septic systems. Three percolation boring test were
conducted on each lot. Percolation rates range from 5 to 30 minutes per inch which are
considered very good for septic systems. This impact is considered to be less than significant.
7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS--
Would the project:
a)Create a significant hazard to the public or the R F]
environment through the routine transport, use,or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b)Create a significant hazard to the public or the aEJ
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
c)Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or n R
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
d)Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and,as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e)For a project located within an airport land use plan
area or,where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
living or working in the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, F] ❑ El
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
living or working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with
an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h)Expose people or structures to a significant risk of F
loss, injury or death involving wildland fires,including
07126/02Page 7 ZCH 2002.0029.IS-MNDJ-25-02:
ANN-
CITY OFATASCADERO
IMTL9L STUDY
Initial Study 2002-0030 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant with Significant Impact
Zone Change 2002-0029 Impact Mitigation Impact
Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation
Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014
2000 Ferrocarril Road
where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or
where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
SOURCES:Project description,Atascadero Fire response maps,Atascadero Land Use Element EIR.
City of Atascadero Chief Building Official
DISCUSSION:
7a. The project will not involve the transport or disposal of hazardous materials.
7b. The project is located adjacent to the Union Pacific Railroad which routinely transports
hazardous materials in railcars. Due to the large lot configuration and low density of the project
only six units will be adjacent to the railroad tracks. The minimum setback of these six units is
110 feet from center line of tracks. In addition,the units are approximately 20-feet above the
tracks. This impact is considered to be less than significant.
7c. The project will not emit hazardous material.
7d. The site is not listed as a hazardous material site.
7e,f The project is not within 2-miles of an airport.
7g. The project will not impact any evacuation routes or plans.
7h. The site is within a moderate risk wildland fire hazard area. Roof construction requirement and
Atascadero Fire standards applied during building permits reduce this impact to a level of less
than significant.
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY--Would the
project:
a)Violate any water quality standards or-waste FJD Q
discharge requirements? Inj
b)Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or F ® ❑
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such
that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a
lowering of the local groundwater table level(e.g.,the
production rate of previously-existing nearby wells
would drop to a level that would not support existing
land uses or planned uses for which permits have
been granted)?
c)Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of F] ® El
the site or area,including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river,in a manner which would
result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site?
d)Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of
the site or area,including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river,or substantially increase
the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that
would result in flooding on-or off-site?
e)Create or contribute runoff water which would
0726102 Page 8 ZCH 2002.0029.IS-MND.7.26-02.wmfdoc
sM� CITY OF ATASCADERO
" y INITIAL STUDY
Initial Study 2002-0030 potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significantwith Significant Impact
Zone Change 2002-0029 Impact Mitigation Impact
Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation
Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014
2000 Ferrocarril Road
exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater IVI
drainage systems or provide substantial additional El n
sources of polluted runoff?
f)Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ❑
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area
as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or
Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard
delineation map?
h)Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures
that would impede or redirect flood flows?
I) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of
loss, injury or death involving flooding, including
flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? El
MN
tf. Ld Y Dw tL-.-Y.d.. Lw Y.•.�w. - _ .._ _ .... ..
J NNIrn fj. _
Site outside
of flood
.<..,. rt._ plain
K.rw
AM
NIM..�r. �-7,«<•, �f - y� Yf. y;,�-i,. -
�":n . .-..moi _ ..+'.•" i „_.� �. •-`""-"..•,r-�,�jT%i - %:.'
i:«:Iw.a• �, vI� yam_�+�•c��"
<frWr.-.tom r
%C KwMIH Thl ��ir6^f�
r r.
:10•�^
w.I...ww<Vw1
Kvr•N.I...r C.. - 1 .��s
c•tr..c.....r zr .S a. 3 .? s j y O r.,.
00
.CKr.IN ...L. 4 Y S �'i�t•.'t�j p
:ii f.,1..
,)a.w-..
.l
z..
r
-�f
L y.T
G--0rAMVA)M=1a 9..cPWM1L7A461J Iw.AiSlPasa Tv.
J
07126/02 Page 9 zCH2O02.0029.IS-MNo.7-25_02.wmt. ��
A-..i.—�41
CITY OFATASCADERO
rNTFL4L STUDY
Initial Study 2002-0030 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant with Significant Impact
Zone Change 2002-0029 Impact Mitigation Impact
Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation
Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014
2000 Ferrocarril Road
SOURCES:Well Completion Report 2-7-02 Central Coast Drilling, GIS FEMA Maps, Project description,
site visit.
DISCUSSION:
8a. The project will not discharge any wastewater.
8b. The majority of the site is not served by the Atascadero Mutual Water Company.The project will
require on-site wells for domestic water service for 13 of the dwelling units. Test wells indicate
ground water at 30-feet with a estimated yield of 10 GPM. The construction of 13 single family
wells is not considered a significant impact to ground water supply.
8c. Development of the site will result in substantial grading and earthwork. This has the potential to
create erosion and off-site siltation: A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)will be
required to be approved by the RWQCB prior to construction. This impact will be less than
significant following mitigation.
8d/e Grading and drainage plans for the site indicate that minimal changes will be made to the site
and the area of impermeable surface will not be significantly increased. This impact is
considered less than significant.
8g/h The proposed development above both the 100 and 500-year flood hazard area. This impact is
considered to be less than significant.
8i. The project site outside of the area subject to inundation if the Salinas Dam above Santa
Margarita were to fail. Due to the low density of the project and proximity of nearby High ground,
evacuation of the site could reasonable be completed if the dam were to fail. This impact is
considered to be less than significant.-
8j.
ignificant:8j. The site is not subject to seiche, tsunami or mudflows.
MITIGATION MEASURES
8.c.1. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)will be required to be approved by the
RWQCB prior to construction.
9. LAND USE AND PLANNING -Would the project:
a)Physically divide an established community?
b)Conflict with any applicable land use plan,policy,or F] ❑
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the
project(including, but not limited to the general plan,
specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning
ordinance)adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
c)Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation E
plan or natural community conservation plan? 11 N
SOURCES: Land Use Element,project description,City of Atascadero Zoning Ordinance
DISCUSSION:
9a-c. The proposed use is an allowable use at this property and does not conflict with the General Plan
07rz6102 Page 10
ZCH 2002-0029.IS-MN0.7-2S-02.vard..I
CITY OFATASCADERO
« ' INITIAL STUDY
Initial Study 2002-4030 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Signiftcantwith Significant Impact
Zone Change 2002-0029 Impact Mitigation Impact
Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation
Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014
2000 Ferrocarril Road
or any known habitat conservation plan for this area.
10. MINERAL RESOURCES--Would the project:
a)Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important E E] 11/2211
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
SOURCES: Project description
DISCUSSION:
10a-b. The site is the former location of a gravel quarry that was abandoned 70 years ago. Due to its
small size, limited access and proximity to residential neighborhoods,the site is not considered
an ideal site for mining operations. This impact is considered less than signficant.
11. NOISE—Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels
in excess of standards established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance,or applicable standards of
other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
ground-borne vibration or ground-borne noise levels?
c)A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise D
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
d)A substantial temporary or periodic increase in
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan
or,where such a plan has not been adopted,within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the
project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within.the vicinity of a private airstrip, F D F]
would the project expose people living or working in
the project area to excessive noise levels?
SOURCES:Noise Mitigation Analysis and Recommendation: Dohn Associates Acoustical Consulting
f '
V
Page 11
07126102 2CH 2002-0029,IS-MND.7-2S-02.vrts._....-
k
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
Initial Study 2002-0030 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant with Significant Impact
Zone Change 2002-0029 Impact Mitigation Impact
Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation
Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014
2000 Ferrocarril Road
1/5/02, Project description
DISCUSSION:
11 a/b The project will be located along the Union Pacific Railroad which is a source of infrequent but
significant noise. When trains on traveling on the tracks a noise level contour of 65 Ldn is found
175 feet from center line of tracks. The minimum residential setback is 110 feet from centerline.
Although sound attenuation walls could reduce this noise level to meet City Standards of 60 Ldn
they are not recommended due to there visual impacts and infrequent nature of the noise. When
trains are not present the site's Ldn is approximately 50. The following mitigation measures
would reduce this impact to a level of less than significant.
11 c. The project will not produce noise.
lid. There is some potential for a temporary Increase in noise generation or exposure to noise as a
result of a construction activities. Compliance with the City's noise ordinance will reduce this
impact to a level of less than significant.
11 a/f. The project is not in the vicinity of an airport.
MITIGATION MEASURES
11.a.1. Deed disclosures shall be recorded against all lots notifying potential buyers that noise levels on
their property will most likely exceed the recommended limits established by the City of.
Atascadero when trains are present on the tracks. Advise buyers that noise levels during train
passbys will be very loud, potentially annoying,and perhaps startling.
11.a.2. Locate outdoor living spaces out of direct line-of-sight with the railway to the extent possible.
11.a.3. Installed landscaped berms around outdoor living areas that have direct line-of-sight with the
railway.
11.a.4. Construct all housing will stucco siding and concrete or tile roofing materials to reduce interior
noise.
11.a.5. Minimize windows that have direct line of sight with railway.
12. POPULATION AND HOUSING --Would the
project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area,
either directly(for example,by proposing new homes
and businesses)or indirectly(for example,through
extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b)Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c)Displace substantial numbers of people, F]necessitating the construction of replacement housing
07as02 Page 12
_ i1b7
ZCH 2002-0029 JS-h1N0.7-25-02.wml d,_ _ _
n-,
CITY OFATASCADERO
s INITIAL STUDY
Initial Study 2002-0030 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Signiricantwith Significant Impact
Zone Change 2002-0029 Impact Mitigation Impact
Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation
Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014
2000 Ferrocarril Road
elsewhere?
SOURCES: Project description, City of Atascadero Land Use Element EIR
DISCUSSION:
12a-c: The project will provide additional housing. These impacts are considered benefical.
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a)Would the project result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with the provision of new
or physically altered governmental facilities, need for
new or physically altered governmental facilities,the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios,response times or other performance
objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection? rglFJ V\J
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks? aF-1 IFNI
Other public facilities? F El F]
SOURCES: Project description, Land Use Element EIR
DISCUSSION:
13a-d. The addition of a 13 new dwellings at this location will not significantly alter the need for any
public services beyond what is anticipated in the approved Land Use Element EIR. This impact
is considered to be less than significant.
14. RECREATION -
a)Would the project increase the use of existing F] ❑ ® F
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of
the facility would occur or be accelerated?
b)Does the project include recreational facilities or F] E VmNi F]
require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on
07/26102 page 13 2cH 2002.0029.Is-MNO.7.25-02.wmf.dt- _ .,
CITY OF ATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
Initial Study 2002-0030 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Zone Change 2002-0029 Significant Significantwith Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation
Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014
2000 Ferrocarril Road
the environment? .
SOURCES:Project description
DISCUSSION:
14a. Residential development of the site has been anticipated by the General Plan, including the
parks and recreation element.That element provides policies and programs for development of
parks as needed. The project will provide a linear 5.76 acre open space parcel and bikeway
consist with the General Plan. This impact is less than significant.
14b. Construction of the bikeway will occur on a flat parcel next to the railroad. No additional adverse
impacts are anticipated.
15.TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC--Would the
project:
a)Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in ❑
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the ❑
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
Intersections)?
b)Exceed, either individually or cumulatively,a level of ❑
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or
highways?
c)Result In a change in air traffic patterns,including ❑ ❑
either an increase in traffic levels or a change in
location that results in substantial safety risks?
d)Substantially increase hazards due to a design ❑ ❑
feature(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections)
or incompatible uses (e.g.,farm equipment)?
e)Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ❑
f)Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ ❑ ❑
g)Conflict with adopted policies, plans,or programs ❑
Li supporting alternative transportation (e.g.,bus ❑
turnouts, bicycle racks)?
SOURCES: Project description,Site plans
DISCUSSION:
15a. The project will take primary access from EI Camino Real off a new collector street that is
Identified the General Plan. This road will require the construction of a grade separated railroad
or2e102 Page 14
ZCH 2002.0029.ISMND.7-25.02.wrsdr'
CITY OFATASCADERO
s IMTIAL STUDY
Initial Study 2002-0030 Potentiaily Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant with Significant Impact
Zone Change 2002-0029 Impact Mitigation Impact
Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation
Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014
2000 Ferrocarril Road
crossing at EI Camino Real that has been approved under a separate project. The project will
generate approximately 130 daily trips which will not significantly impact a collector street. This
Impact Is considered less than significant.
15b. The 130 daily trips will not exceed any standards. No impact.
15c. No impact
15d. There are no increased circulation hazards associated with the project. No impact.
15e. The project will provide a new emergency access connection between EI Camino Real and
Ferrocarril Avenue. This is considered a beneficial impact.
15f. No special parking requirements.
15g. Project proposes bikeways consistent the General Plan. Beneficial impact.
16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS --Would the
project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the F] IFNI
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b)Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities,the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm
water drainage facilities or expansion of existing
facilities,the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources,or
are new or expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider that serves or may serve the project
that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's
projected demand in.addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
f)Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted
capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste
disposal needs?
g)Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
SOURCES: Project description,site plans.
DISCUSSION:
16a. The project will be served by on site septic systems. No impact.
r. M`7
U 6 .0
Page 15 - •A a
07/26102 � ZCfi 2002-0029.1$-MN0.7-25-02.wmt.
s
CITY OFATASCADERO
IM77AL STUDY
Initial Study 2002-0030 Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant with Significant Impact
Zone Change 2002-0029 Impact Mitigation Impact
Conditional Use Permit 2002-0067 Incorporation
Tentative Tract Map 2002-0014
2000 Ferrocarrii Road
16b. The project will be served by on site wells. No impact.
16c. The project will require minor grading and drainage improvements due to the large lots. No
impact.
16.d. The project will be served by on site wells. No impact.
16e/g. The project will be served by City solid waste pick-up services. Less than significant impact.
17.MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE--
a)Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment,substantially*reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
Wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b)Does the project have impacts that are individually Q
limited, but cumulatively considerable?("Cumulatively
considerable"means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
c)Does the project have environmental effects that will F F
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
SOURCES
1. 5/13/02 Arbor Tree Surgery Arborist Report
2. 11/27/01 Botanical Survey by Sierra Delta Corp
3. 11/20/01 Kit Fox/Biological Survey by Sierra Delta Corp
4. Phase 1 Archaeological Assessment CA Signer&Associates 11/27/01
5. Geotechnical Engineering and Percolation Report Buena Geotechnical Services 12/19/02
6. Well Completion Report 2-7-02 Central Coast Drilling
7. Noise Mitigation Analysis and Recommendation:Dohn Associates Acoustical Consulting 1/5/02
8. 2025 General Plan, City of Atascadero,2002
9. Zoning Ordinance, part of Municipal Code, City of Atascadero,as amended through 2001.
10. Project description: includes:
07n6102 Page 16 �� •�
ZCH 2002-0029.ISMN0.7-25.02.wmf.da
.&
CITY OFATASCADERO
INITIAL STUDY
Tentative tract map
Written project description
Preliminary grading plan
Master Plan of Development
11. 2025 General Plan EIR Crawford, Multari, &Starr,certified 2002
5. CEQA Handbook,Air Quality Control District,August 1995
6. Acoustical Design Manual, Brown-Buntin Associates, 1991
T. Noise Ordinance, City of Atascadero, 1992
8. Flood Insurance Rate Map, community-panel number 060700 0004 B, Federal Emergency
Management Agency,January 20, 1982
9. Trip Generation, Institute of Traffic Engineers
10. State Water Resources Quality Control Board, Basin Plan
v i
07r26/02 Page 17 _
ZCH 2002.0029.IS-MN0.7-25-02.wmt.
City of Atascadero
Resolution No.2002-052
APCD Letter
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL DISTRICT 7REIVED
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
I 2002EVELOPMENT
August 19,2002
Warren Frace
City of Atascadero
Community Development Department
6500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero,CA 93422
SUBJECT: Negative Declaration Comments for the Gearhart Ferrocarril Road Residential Suburban
Sub xctuf'rojsct.2000 Ferrocarril Road,Atascadero
Mr.Frace,
Thank you for including the San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District(District)in the development
plan review process. We have completed our review of the project referral for the.Planned Development
Zone Change with a Master Plan of Development to allow a 16 lot single family residential suburban
subdivision on an approximately 38.5 acre site with approximately 6 acres of open space and 13 dwellings
having 2.5 acre minimum lot sizes.
GENERAL.,. .
The first Land Use Planning Strategy in the District's Clean Air Plan(CAP)is,"Planning Compact
Communities". Maintaining compact city and village areas reduces reliance on the automobile by
enhancing the viability of public transit and maximizing the potential for walking and bicycling to work,
shopping,and other destinations. A more compact community results in fewer vehicle trips and fewer
vehicle miles traveled. Therefore,vehicle emissions are reduced by compact community development.
While the proposed project is within the Urban Reserve Line,it is located near the urban fringe.The
District recommends prioritizing higher density development in the urban core prior to increased low-
density development at the urban fringe. Should the project be approved however,we have the following
conuritents regarding thy::proposal;
,SPECIFIC COMMENTS
Commendations
District staff evaluated the potential operational project impacts by running the URBEMIS 2001 computer
model,a tool for estimating vehicle travel,fuel use and the resulting emissions related to this land use
project. The results of the model demonstrated that operational impacts will likely be close to the CEQA
mitigation threshold value of IO lbs of emissions per day. In an effort to mitigate the incremental
contributions to air quality impacts that result from the operational phase of this project,a multi-use
Class 1 bicycle,pedestrian,and equestrian trail encompassing approximately 6 acres will be built.This
measure will not only tend to reduce vehicle emissions by offering a local attraction to the residence,but it
will likely also help to build community interaction. This measure is to be commended as being consistent
with suggested transportation control measures in the CAP.
3433 Roberto Court•San Luis Obispo,CA 93401•805-781-5912•FAX:8OS-7811002
info@slocleanaicorg 4r www.slocleanairorg
printed on recycled paper
City of Atascadero
Resolution No.2002-052
Gearhart Ferrocarril Road Residential Suburban Subdivision Project
August 19,2002
Page 2 of 3
Construction Phase Mitigation
The construction phasemitigation measures listed as Attachment 1 to the Negative Declaration should
minimize the potential for nuisance dust issues with the following minor modifications:
1. Add the following sentences at the end of Item A:
Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed I I mph.
Reclaimed(nonpotable)water should be used whenever possible.
2. In Item G,add the word"approved"after the word"methods"
All dirt stock-pile areas should be sprayed daily as needed.
These additions are to maintain consistency with the dust control measures identified in the District CEQA
Air Quality Handbook dated August 1997. Full implementation of these dust control measures during the
project construction phase will minimize the air quality impacts and reduce the potential for nuisance'
concerns to nearby properties. Further,specifying that all grading and demolition plans include the
fugitive dust control'measures is a good means.of ensuring adherence to the dust control measures.
The District also recommends inclusion of the following energy efficiency mitigation.methods in order to
reduce the demand on electrical supply and reduce emissions at the power plant source.
• increase attic and wall.insulation beyond Title 24 requirements
• Use built-in energy efficient appliances
• Use double paned windows
• Use energy efficient interior lighting
Trip reduction benefits can be realized by ensuring that the new homes are built with'flexibility in the
internal wiring/cabling to allow telecommuting,teleconferencing,and telelearning to occur simultaneously
at several locations throughout the homes.
CAUTIONS
,..�
ftm4c 'about.t)tis developnfttproilM'
OW
1. Asbcstos:
It was not clear from the project referral information if there are currently structures on the property. If
there are,demolition of these structures has potential negative air quality impacts,including issues
surrounding properdemolition and disposal of asbestos containing material(ACM). If there are any
demolition of structures,this project would be subject to the requirements stipulated in the National
Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants(NESHAP). These include,but are not limited to:
1)notification requirements to the District,2)asbestos survey conducted by a Certified Asbestos
Inspector,and 3)applicable removal and disposal requirements of identified ACM. Please contact
Tim Fuhs of the APCD Enforcement Division at(805)781-5912 for further information.
2. Naturally Occurring Asbestos:
Asbestos has been identified by the state Air Resources Board as a toxic air contaminant.Serpentine is
City of Ataseadero
Resolution No.2002-052
Gearhart Ferrocarril Road Residential Suburban Subdivision Project
August 19,2002
Page 3 of 3
a very common rock type in the state and was identified by the Board as having the potential io contain
naturally occurring asbestos. Under the recent State Air Resources Board Air Toxics Control Measure
(ATCM)for Construction,Grading,Quarrying,and Surface Mining Operations,prior to any grading
activities at the site,a geologic analysis will be necessary to determine if serpentine rock is
present. If naturally occurring asbestos is found at the site an Asbestos Health and Safety
Program and an Asbestos Dust Control Plan is required to be approved by the District before
construction begins. If you have any questions regarding these requirements,contact Karen Brooks of
the APCD Enforcement Division at(805)781-5912.
3 'F _^
within San Luis Obispo County. Under certain circumstances where no technically feasible
alternatives are available,limited developmental burning under restrictions may be allowed. This
requires prior application,payment of fee based on the size of the project,District approval,and
issuance of a bum permit by the District and the local fire department authority. The applicant is.
required to furnish the District with the study of technical feasibility(which includes costs and other
constraints)at the time of application. If you have any questions regarding these requirements,contact
Karen Brooks of our Enforcement staff at(805)7$1-5912.
4. Toxic Diesel Exhaust:
Building the homes and open-space use area near the Union Pacific Railroad tracks could potentially
result in exposures to toxic diesel emissions from the train engines,particularly if engines were to idle
in that location. Since this area is ldcely single tracked,trains will likely remain in the area for
extended periods of time and therefore the risk and potential for nuisance odor complaints should be
low.
The District thanks you for the opportunity to review this project and if you have any questions or
comments,please feel free to contact me at 781-5912.
l Sincerely,
JIM
Andy Mutziger
Air Quality Specialist
cc: David Dixon,APCD Engineering Division
Tim Fuhs,APCD Enforcement Division
Karen Brooks,APCD Enforcement Division
kI Arg
HAOISTLAMRESPONSM253$.doc
City of Atascadero
Resolution No.2002-052
Atascadero Mutual Water Company Letter
5006 EL CAWW REAL • P.O.DOX(t M • ATWADERO,CA 66423 • 4U-"7B
AaGa cAero MuUW Water Company
September 11,2002
Mr.Warren Frace SEPCity of Atascadero
CommunityC
ity Development Department
6500 Palms Avenue coF
Atascadero,CA 93422
Subject: 2000 Ferrocarrll Road/De Anza Estates
TTM 2002-0014
Dear Warren:
At their September 4,2002 meeting,the AMWC Board of Directors provided us with
additional direction regarding the subject project. The Board felt annexation into the AMWC
service area would be the most appropriate means of supplying water to the proposed
subdivision for both fire suppression and domestic uses. Therefore,the Board recmrmends
that the City require the developer to annex the property into the AMWC service area.
Furthermore,the Board recommended that other areas within the City not currently within the
AMWC service area be included in the annexation.
Apropos to your August 29,2002 later,we are providing you with the following conditions of
approval Intended to mitipate the environmental Impacts of the project.Note that Condition
Nos.2 and 3.c exclude both septic tanks within IW%etof the nOdhOdy tract
boundary. it is does not appear practical to install 50-foot sanitary seals on the private welts
due to the relative shallowness of the aquifer. The 150-foot setback reduces the potential for
contamination of the community wells to a level of insignificance.
1. Prior to recording the final map,the applicant shall make every effort to annex the
property Into the AMWC service area. The annexation is required to provide the
subdivision with an adequate,safe and rehab source of water for domestic and fire
suppression uses.if annexation into the AMWC service area fails for reasons beyond the
control of the applicant,the applicant shall perform well tests on each lot to the
satsfadion of the City Engineer. The final map shall not record until the well tests reveal
there is an adequate,safe,reliable and long-term water supply available for each lot.
2. The applicant shall provide a 150-foot wide exdusionary easement contiguous to the
northerly bad boundary that expressly prohibits construction of septic systems or wells.
The applicant shall provide the easement by separate insbumerd,shall show the
easement on the final map,and shall address the restrictions In the CC&Ks for the
pro1ed
City of Ataseadero
Resolution No.2002-052
Warren Frere
osh 1102
De Anna Estaft
Paps 2 of 3
3. The applicant shall record instruments separate from and concurrent with the final map
that discloses tine Rk wing to ati property owners within the subdivision. AMWC shag
�
e content of the instruments motive to these Conditions of
al before 11hey record.
A. AMWC operates community water wells on the parcel adjacent to
subdivision(the`River Paroon and that operation said communitywells will
have Influence over and Interfere with the private wells conetruc ied on the lots
within the subdivision.
S. Development and operation of community`^ell$and other water-related
faclfilfes on the River Parcel will be of an industrial nature. Impacts to the
subdivision will result lrcm operations on the River Parcel that produce
intermittent and continuous noise and dust Other activities will include the
drilling of wells,excavation of reoovery ponds,construction of pipelines,
hailing,handling and storage of hazardous materials,and mon of
well and treatment buildings.
C. The existence of an easement that prohibits construction of septic systems or
wells within 154•feet of the norlheeV trail boundary.
D. The possible future uses of the River Parcel that could include residential
subdivisions,public parks or other uses.
E. Prohibitions on the export of water from the private wells within the
subdivision or transfer of water between properties within the subdivision.
4. Alt proposed trail access points on to AMWC property,the Salinas River or the De Anza
trail snail Include appropriate$ignage and vehicular barriers to prevent property damage,
damage to the riparian environment,vandalism,uses inconsistent with AMWC policies,
or other inappropriats or illegal uses. All access points shall be adequately maintained by
the City or an entity established to nwoltain the,V to the month em frac Access
to ryry WC property
k
where the proposed roadway Contiguous to AMWC P
controlled in a manner consistent with other access points
In addition to the conctitiorrs Of approval listed above that are required to mitigate the
environmental impacts of the project,the following conditions of app
roval related to to
tentative tract map should be incorporated into the project:
1. The applicant shall provide a 30-foot wide access and water main easement across
Parcel 1 of Parcel Map AT 01.060 recorded In 58-PM-37 m the office of�eastty
Recorder(APN 491-005). The easement"pa more or less,
SAY
boundary of Parcel 1. The easement shell be bounded on the south by the existing W
fcot wide access and water main easemaswt aeras Parol 1 andParceof Parcels l and
2 of said parcel
rnap and shall be bounded on the north by Me northwesterlyboundary
2. The easement shall connect the existing dirt roadway on the River Parcel(APN 49•
011-001)to the existing access and water main easement aeras Parcel 1 and Parcel 2
that benefits AMWC-
City of Ataseadero
Resolution No.2002-052
Warren Frace
09/11/'02
De Anna Estates
Paps 3 of 3
2. The applicant OWN retain the existing 50-000 wide access and water maln easement that
benefits AMWC sense Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 of Parcel Map A7 01.0®0. Said map is
recorded in 56-PM-37 In the office of the County Recorder(APN's 49.281-005.024).
Recording of the final map shall not eliminate or otherwise alter'the existing 30-loot wile
access and water main easernent across Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 that benefits AMWC.
3. The applicant shall provide a 604NA wide access and water main easement to AMWC
across the proposed subdivision. The easemant shall follow#10 roadway alignment
shown on tentative map.
4. The applicant shall provide 10•foot wide water line saaemenis to AMWC. The
easer vvb shall be parallel to the side lot lines of Lot Nos.1 through 5 and be bounded
on the south by the proposed road right-of way shown on the tentative map and on the
north by the northerly tract boundary. The easements shell be In a form approved by
AMWC.
5. The applicant shall provide an access and water main easement across the property to
north of the River Parcel(connrnonly referred to as the Rochelle Property)to AMWC. The
easement shall include any bridge,at-grade crossing,underpass or other means
of the to
cross the Union Pacific Railroad rigM-of way to gain access to the property east
tracks.
6. Ail access rights granted by the appiiaent to AMWC relative to these conditions of
approval shall be equal or superior to the rights granted the property owners
within of the
subdivision. The easements shall benefit AMWC and all future ptiparty owners
River Parcel or subdivisions thereof. The applicant shall not place restr"ons on the
access rights granted by the easements required by these conditions of approval such
as,but not limited to,prohibitions against hauling hazardous materials or large equipment
or hours of use.
Respectfully Yount,
oho B.Neeil�
Director of Operations
City of Atascadero
Resolution No.2002-052
Upper Salinas-Las Tablas Resource Conservation District Letter
VpperSafinas-Las Ta6fas 44source Conservation(District
65 Main Street Suite 108,Templeton,CA 934651(805)434-0396 eV 4/faa(434-0284
RECE1WEDJ
AUG`21 2002
Erosion Cooftel 04sssistance Jorograw COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
August 20,2002
Warren l?face `` .�,n
Community Development Department
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero,CA 93422
RE: Review of Zone Change/CUP,Applicant:Kelly Gearhart ZCH 2002-0029/CUP 2002-0067
Site Location,2000 Ferrocarril Rd(east of Union Pacific RR)
Dear Warren,
Thank you for referring the above Zone Change and Conditional Use Permit proposal to our
agency. The project is located adjacent to the Salinas River and has numerous mature trees and a
wide drainage swale through the center of the site. The swale is located just above 100-year flood
level. The swale is approximately 25 feet below the terrace elevation. It carries the drainage from
a large area of Atascadero west of Traffic Way.
We are working in a cooperative program with the City,State Fish and Game,Regional Water
Quality Control Board,State Water Resources Control Board,NRCS,the Monterey Bay National
Marine Sanctuary and others to determine measures to reduce erosion,limit sedimentation,address
flooding and improve habitat along the Salinas River.. The Salinas River is a corridor for migrating
steelhead that travel to the few remaining steelhead habitats in our region upstream of Atascadero.
Projects near the River should incorporate measures that will enhance the habitat conditions in the "
River.
The property contains many cottonwoods,sycamores and oaks. The removal of these trees should
be considered to be significant. The design of the subdivision(contained in the Initial Study)does
not address cluster measures that could protect most of these trees.
The preliminary subdivision design most notably lacks any grading plans. The amount of grading
to traverse the deep drainage swale will be considerable. The roadway slopes are not indicated. At
2 to 1 slope,the grading will result in the removal of many more trees than indicated in the Initial
City of Atascadero
Resolution No.2002-052
ECAP Review
Study. The amount of trees to be removed.cannot be determined until after the grading design is
completed.
In addition,the lowland area of the property is a wide swale that floods periodically from the
drainage waters from the developed area west of Traffic Way. This swale contains sediments from
upland erosion. It is recommended that no development be permitted in the swale and that the
swale be designed as a large sediment basin to continue to capture future sediments. This will help
to address the high sediment problems in the Salinas River.
REVISED SUMMARY OF OUR CONCLUSIONS:
tg 49 exec t, ;c eyed; Grading ry
}iatts tl to lie s> the'propose roadways and possible future building sites.
2. The site drainage should address the increased runoff to the Salinas River. It is
recommended that the drainage swale be designed as large sediment basin to trap sediments
and prevent them from entering the Salinas River. The swale periodically floods during the
winter. This swale could be a tremendous resource as a wetland area adjacent to the River.
3. The proposed removal of Sycamores,oaks and cottonwoods should be considered to be a
significant environmental affect. The site layout,if redesigned for cluster of homes,could
mitigate this significant environmental affect. -
4. The project should include a provision for a pedestrian trail along the Salinas River.The
River is an amenity that should be better utilized by the City.
Again,I hope that our comments are helpful. We would be happy to review the grading,drainage,
tree protection and erosion control plans.
S' cerel
onal J.Funk
^7 Executive Director
- -- - _.
0-
x r;
ri'> a 3r.
cc Amanda,Tt
Dave Highland,Dept.of Fish and Gain
2