HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 052599 Approved as submitted
DATE: 07/13/99
MINUTES
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY,MAY 25, 1999
CLOSED SESSION,6:30 P.M.:
1. Conference with legal counsel - anticipated litigation - significant exposure to
litigation(Govt. Code §54956.9)
NFL Construction v. City of Atascadero
2. Conference with real property negotiators - Lease of Atascadero Unified School
District Facilities
City negotiators: Brady Cherry and Wade McKinney
Session will concern price and terms of payment.
3. Conference with labor negotiator(Govt. Code Sec. 54957.6)
Agency Negotiator: City Manager
Employee organizations: Department Heads, Mid-Management/Professional,
Confidential, Atascadero Fire Captains, Atascadero Firefighters, Service
Employees Intl. Union Local 620, Atascadero Police Assoc.
City Attorney Roy Hanley announced the Council gave direction to the City Manager and the
City Attorney.
REGULAR SESSION, 7:00 P.M.:
Mayor Johnson called the Regular Session to order at 7:05 p.m. and Council Member Luna led
the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Council Members Arrambide, Clay, Lerno, Luna and Mayor Johnson
Absent: None
Others Present: City Clerk Marcia Torgerson and City Treasurer David Graham
Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Police Chief Dennis Hegwood, Fire Chief
Mike McCain, Community Services Director Brady Cherry,
Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard, Community and
Economic Development Director Paul Saldana, Parks and Recreation
Superintendent Geoff English, Assistant City Engineer John Neil and City
Attorney Roy Hanley
CC 5/25/99
Page 1 of 11
Approved as submitted
DATE: 07/13/99
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Council Member Luna asked for clarification of the split meeting. Mr. McKinney explained that
the Redevelopment Agency is requesting a special joint meeting to set a hearing date.
MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide and seconded by Council Member
Clay to approve the agenda.
Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Luna opposed)
PRESENTATIONS:
1. Community Development Department Director Paul Saldana will present new employees
to the Council.
Community and Economic Director Paul Saldana introduced Assistant Planner Jamie Heltsley,
Assistant Planner Phil Dunsmore, and Principal Planner Warren Frace to the City Council.
2. Proclamation declaring May 1999, "Clean Air Month"
Mayor Johnson read the Proclamation and presented it to Paul Allen, a representative of the Air
Pollution Control District.
Mr. Allen accepted the Proclamation and answered questions from the Council.
COMMUNITY FORUM:
John McGoff, 9192 Maple St., expressed his concerns with the uncovered trucks leaving the
Albertson's construction site. He commented that the dust along south El Camino Real is
excessive. Mr. McGoff also stated that he did not agree with the split meeting scheduled tonight.
Mayor Johnson asked the City Attorney for an opinion on the legality of the split meeting. Mr.
Hanley replied that in his opinion, it is not illegal. Council Member Luna asked the Police Chief
about the restrictions of uncovered trucks. Chief Hegwood replied that he would look into the
problem.
Hal Carden, 5355 San Jacinto, thanked the Council for their approach with the Redevelopment
Agency. He repeated the fact that the Chamber has voted to support the Redevelopment
authority.
Raymond Jansen, 6655 Country Club Drive, stated that the role of character in government is
important. He cautioned the Council concerning their moral conduct.
CC 5/25/99
Page 2 of 11
Approved as submitted
DATE: 07/13/99
Frank Kock, 9545 Lakeview Drive, stated that property owners around the Lake have faced such
issues as Agape Home on Santa Rosa, lights around the lake, and now property swapping. He
asked the Council to consider notifying neighbors of issues concerning their neighborhood even
if it's not required by law. He stated that it will give the neighbors a chance to speak on the
issue. Council Member Luna asked if the neighbors were notified about Item#C-l. Mr. Cherry
stated that there was an article in the newspaper and that he did speak with Alan Thomas, but no
direct notification was made.
John McGoff, 9192 Maple St., asked why we didn't just change the Agenda in response to the
April 27, 1999 meeting regarding the Redevelopment Agency meetings. He stated that he felt
the Redevelopment Agency meeting should be held at a time certain. Mr. Hanley clarified that
the Redevelopment Agency meeting tonight is scheduled immediately following the City
Council meeting which is what the bylaws state.
Leland Stout, 8380 Santa Rosa Road, stated that he lives near some property owned by the City.
He stated that when he bought the property he was assured that it would not be built upon;
however, now the Council has traded the lots. Mayor Johnson informed Mr. Stout that the
subject matter was an agenda item and asked if he could please postpone his comments.
Mayor Johnson closed the Community Forum period.
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS:
Council Member Clay asked that we get more aggressive concerning the dust problem at the
Albertson site.
Council Member Luna asked if it was a possibility for the Highway Patrol to weigh the trucks to
insure that they are not overloaded. Chief Hegwood replied that it was possible.
Council Member Clay stated that the Children's Day in the Park turned out great.
Mayor Johnson stated that the Coalition for Decency has stated that the City should purchase the
vacant property next to Diamond's Adult World. He stated that this property is already in
escrow and the City is not in a position to purchase it. Mr. McKinney explained that the
Coalition had contacted him and requested the Redevelopment Agency purchase the property.
He explained that it was not possible for the Agency to purchase the lot at the time.
Mr. Hanley explained that the City is not allowed to drive a business out of town just because we
don't want it in town.
Mayor Johnson also stated that it was reported to him that Mr. Diamond owned the Pawnshop
across the street. He stated that he had the matter researched and found the information was to be
untrue.
CC 5/25/99
Page 3 of 11
Approved as submitted
DATE: 07/13/99
A. CONSENT CALENDAR: Roll Call
1. Amendment to Contract between the City of Atascadero and the California Public
Employees' Retirement System - Fiscal Impact: None (Staff recommendation: Council
adopt Ordinance No. 358, on second reading by title only, authorizing the Mayor to
execute an amendment to the contract between the City Council of the City of Atascadero
and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees'Retirement System)
[Wade McKinney]
MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Arrambide to approve Item #A-1.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Weed Abatement - Hearing of Objections - Fiscal Impact: None (Staff recommendation:
Council hear and consider all objections to the proposed removal of vegetative growth
and/or refuse and allow or overrule any objections. Following the hearing, authorize the
Fire Chief to proceed and perform the work of abatement) [Mike McCain]
Fire Chief Mike McCain gave the staff report and answered questions of Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Bob Sparling, 7500 San Palo Road, stated that his property should be exempt as he has cattle
grazing in the area. Fire Chief McCain responded that his notice was an oversight and to
disregard it.
Mayor Johnson closed the Public Comment period.
MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Lerno to
approve the authorization of the Fire Chief to proceed and perform
the work of abatement.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
2. General Plan Amendment 98006 / Zone Change 98009 - 9800 El Camino Real (U.S.
Postal Service) -Fiscal Impact: Increase in property tax revenue (Planning Commission
recommendations: 1) Council adopt Resolution No. 1999-027, approving General Plan
Amendment 98006, and 2) Council introduce for first reading by title only, Ordinance
No. 359, approving Zone Change 98009) [Paul Saldana]
CC 5/25/99
Page 4 of 11
Approved as submitted
DATE: 07/13/99
Community and Economic Development Director Paul Saldafia gave the staff report and
answered questions of Council.
Council Member Luna gave a short presentation using overheads regarding uses allowed in
Commercial Retail and Commercial Services zoning including sexually oriented businesses in
certain situations. He stated that he would support a change to Commercial Tourist but not to
Commercial Service or Commercial Retail.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Rush Kolemaine, P.O. Box 1990, asked if there is an application for the development of this
parcel. Mr. Saldana responded that there was none. Mr. Kolemaine stated that he agreed with
Council Member Luna.
Mayor Johnson closed the Public Comment period.
Mayor Johnson asked the City Attorney to explain the limitations of property use for adult
oriented businesses. Mr. Hanley explained the City chose to utilize the dispersal method to have
a double restriction in order to minimize the number of sexually oriented businesses allowed.
Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide suggested re-zoning this site to Commercial Tourist in lieu of
Commercial Service.
MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Arrambide to adopt Resolution No. 1999-027, approving General Plan
Amendment 98006.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Arrambide to introduce for first reading by title only, Ordinance No.
359, approving Zone Change 98009 with the following amendment:
Commercial Service is changed to Commercial Tourist.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
3. Appeal of Planning Commission Approval of Automobile Sales Lot - Conditional Use
Permit 99002 - 5000 San Palo Road (Gearhart) - Fiscal Impact: Increase in sales and property
tax revenue (Staff recommendation: Council adopt Resolution No. 1999-029, upholding the
Planning Commission's action approving the Conditional Use Permit, with conditions.) [Paul
Saldana]
Community and Economic Development Director Paul Saldana gave the staff report and
answered questions of Council.
CC 5/25/99
Page 5 of 11
Approved as submitted
DATE: 07/13/99
Council Member Luna expressed concern that a car lot would be in a Commercial Tourist area.
He also expressed concern for additional traffic in the area. Mr. McKinney stated that he did not
believe that there were impact fees to assist in possible road or bridge improvements.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Bill Zimmerman, 6225 Lomita Road,the Appellant, explained his concerns with the Planning
Commission's decision. He stated that he opposed the item due to lack of safety and
proper infrastructure.
Eric Greening, 6600 Lewis Ave., stated that he would save his comments concerning traffic until
the next item. He asked if anyone was aware of a motel that shared space with a car sales lot that
was successful.
Dorothy McNeil, 8765 Sierra Vista, stated that she doesn't feel we have a need for an additional
car lot in our town.
Bob Sparling, 7500 San Palo, stated that there is considerable traffic coming from San Palo to
San Anselmo and believes that traffic will be increased with this project.
Ruth Rentschler, 6004 San Palo Road,expressed in a prepared statement(read by City Clerk) her
concerns of the car lot being moved to this site (see attachment A).
Mayor Johnson closed the Public Comment period.
Mayor Johnson stated that it was his understanding that it was possible that San Palo would not
be used as an exit thus traffic on that road may not be an issue. He also stated that the traffic
issue could be brought up as a separate item. Mr. Saldana confirmed the statement to be true.
MOTION: By Council Member Luna to uphold the appeal and send it back to
the Planning Commission with the stipulation that the conditions put
in by staff and deleted by the Planning Commission be reinserted.
Motion failed due to the lack of a second.
MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide and seconded by Mayor Johnson to
approve Resolution No. 1999-029 upholding the Planning
Commission's action approving the Conditional Use Permit,with
conditions.
Motion passed 2:1 by a roll-call vote.
(Luna opposed,Lerno and Clay abstained)
CC 5/25/99
Page 6 of 11
Approved as submitted
DATE: 07/13/99
4. Appeal of Planning Commission Approval - Tentative parcel Map 99002 (AT 99-040) -
6105 San Anselmo and 4700 San Palo Roads (Gearhart) - Fiscal Impact: None (Staff
recommendation: Council adopt Resolution No. 1999-030, upholding the Planning
Commission's action approving the tentative map, based on findings and subject to
conditions) [Paul Saldana]
Community and Economic Development Director Paul Saldana gave the staff report and
answered questions of Council.
Council Member Luna expressed concern for the possibility of the irregular lots to being a blight
issue.
PUBLIC COMMENT
William Zimmerman, 6225 Lomita Road, Appellant, stated that with signal lights controlling
traffic he could support this project. He explained in detail why he feels traffic signals should be
required with this project(see attachment B).
Mayor Johnson asked the City Attorney to comment concerning a tie vote. Mr. Hanley
explained that in a tie situation, the opposition is the prevailing side.
Council Member Luna asked what type of action a change in the General Plan would be and
what would happen in the case of a tie vote. Mr. Hanley replied that it would be legislative and
a tie vote would take it directly to the Council if the prevailing side did not chose to rehear the
item before the close of the meeting.
Eric Greening, 6600 Lewis Ave., stated that he agrees with the Appellant that traffic control is
important. Also, he reminded the Council that CalTrans is going to make Highway 101 six lanes
which will increase the traffic in this area.
Mayor Johnson closed the Public Comment period.
Mr. McKinney explained that he reviewed the traffic issue with the traffic engineer. He stated
that we anticipate 10 vehicle trips per day per lot, while the build out trips per day at Monterey
and San Anselmo is currently is 2,700 trips. Mr. McKinney acknowledged that there is a
circulation problem at this intersection. He explained that this intersection like other
intersections in town may warrant the addition of a signal or other traffic control measures. He
stated that as we can study these areas, we need to do that. He also said that the Council's capital
budget has impacted traffic planning considerably. Mr. McKinney also stated that the Council
has the legal and legislative right to condition the properties to place a signal. The City can
condition those identifiable impacts offsite. However, in places where we have impact fees,
we've identified regional or long-range impacts that can be a more generalized fee so that they
provide traffic improvements throughout the City. Mr. McKinney concluded that to try to make
the leap that there is a traffic problem, and the problem is going to worsen, and then try to tie
these three lots; you can't legally make that nexus.
CC 5/25/99
Page 7 of 11
Approved as submitted
DATE: 07/13/99
Mayor Johnson wanted to clarify that as he understood the situation; we would be asking one
development, rather than all those who contribute to the impact,to carry the cost of impact for
the current 2,700 trips. Mr. McKinney affirmed that as he understood it,that is the appeal.
Mayor Johnson asked if CalTrans has a problem with the light as it is currently structured. Mr.
McKinney responded, yes.
MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide and seconded by Mayor Johnson to
approve the adoption of Resolution No. 1999-030, upholding the
Planning Commission's action approving the tentative map, based on
findings and subject to conditions.
Motion passed 2:1 by a roll-call vote
(Luna opposed, Clay and Lerno abstained)
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Purchase Property (adjacent to Atascadero Lake Park) - APN #031-361-003, #031-361-
011, #031-361-012, 4031-361-015, & #031-361-017
Sell Surplus Property (on Santa Rosa and Sycamore Roads) - APN#028-092-009, #056
322-010, and#056-322-011 -Fiscal Impact: Exchange of$225,000 of City property and
payment of$75,000 from park funds - (Staff recommendation: Council authorize City
Manager to purchase 5 parcel/s at the southwest corner of the intersection of Portola
Road and Morro Road for $300,000 and sell two lots on Santa Rosa Road and one on
Sycamore Road for$225,000 plus associated closing costs) [Wade McKinney]
Community Services Director Brady Cherry gave the staff report and answered questions of
Council.
Mayor Johnson asked for clarification of the park impact fees. Mr. Cherry replied that they
would be used for capital improvements.
PUBLIC COMMENT
John McNeil, 8765 Sierra Vista, asked how the prices for the properties under discussion were
arrived at. Mr. Cherry stated that an appraisal was conducted by Pete Geffre, Jr., Appraisal
Service.
Alan Thomas, 9520 Marchant Way, stated that he is in favor of the City acquiring the property
on Morro Road adjacent to the park. He also stated that he is in favor of the City swapping
property to accomplish this. Mr. Thomas expressed support for the suggestion to condition the
use of the properties being swapped to Mr. Gearhart to be single-family residential only.
Frank Kock, 9545 Lakeview Drive, stated that he feels this is a good deal for the City. He did
express his concern that the neighborhood was not notified on this issue and asked that this item
CC 5/25/99
Page 8 of 11
Approved as submitted
DATE: 07/13/99
be continued to a later meeting after the neighbors are notified. He agreed with Mr. Thomas that
the properties being swapped to Mr. Gearhart be conditioned to have single-family residents 18ft.
maximum in height only.
Bill Zimmerman, 6225 Lomita Road, suggested the previous owner clean up the property prior to
take-over by the City.
Leland Stout, 8380 Santa Rosa Road, stated that he feels the lot bordering the lake should remain
zoned Recreational.
Barbara Combs, 9005 Lakeview, stated that she has created a walk path across the corner of her
property to facilitate walkers. She asked that, in the future, the public be notified concerning the
trading or negotiating of City property.
Rush Kolemaine, P.O. Box 1990, stated that he feels this is a win-win situation. However, he
commented that the neighbors have a right to be notified of an item such as this.
Frank Kock, 9545 Lakeview, stated that the Council should remember that Mr. Gearhart would
have a difficult time developing the lots he's selling to the City. He asked the City to be cautious
of the fact when reviewing appraisals.
Kelly Gearhart, 6205 Alcantara, stated that he wanted to explain some of the background of these
properties. He reported that the City tried to buy these properties in the past for $400,000 but the
previous owners refused to sell to the City because they were unhappy dealing with the City. He
asked that the people be more careful in regards to assumptions made and invited the public to
contact him with questions or comments.
Alan Thomas, 9520 Marchant Way, stated that no one was criticizing Mr. Gearhart,just voicing
his or her thoughts and concerns.
Mayor Johnson closed to the Public Comment period.
Council Member Luna explained that several years ago the City had borrowed 2 million dollars
to build the Police Department, the Pavilion, and to obtain these lots. He also asked for
clarification of restrictions for property use. Mr. McKinney stated that any houses built would
have to conform the existing neighborhood.
MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Arrambide to authorize City Manager to purchase 5 parcels at the
southwest corner of the intersection of Portola Road and Morro Road
for $300,000 and sell two lots on Santa Rosa Road and one on
Sycamore Road for$225,000 plus associated closing costs.
Motion passed 3:0 by a roll-call vote.
(Clay, Lerno abstained)
CC 5/25/99
Page 9 of 11
Approved as submitted
DATE: 07/13/99
2. Weed Abatement - Awarding of Contractor Bid - Fiscal Impact: None (Staff
recommendation: Council determine Hallett's Backhoe Service Inc. not to be a
responsible bidder and award the contract to Jack R. Bridwell) [Mike McCain]
Fire Chief Mike McCain gave the staff report and answered questions of Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT: None
MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Clay to
award the contract to Jack R. Bridwell.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
3. Information Bulletin
Mr. McKinney presented the Information Bulletin and answered questions of the Council.
Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard gave a brief update concerning the Eden
system.
Mayor Johnson called a recess of City Council meeting to the Redevelopment Agency
Meeting at 10:45 p.m.
Mayor Johnson called to reconvene the City Council meeting after the Redevelopment Agency
Meeting at 11:1 S p.m..
4. Set Date for Redevelopment Hearing - Fiscal Impact: None (Staff recommendation:
Council adopt Resolution No. 1999-028, setting June 29, 1999 as the date of the joint
public hearing on the redevelopment plan) [Paul Saldana]
This item was moved to after Section F.
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS:
Integrated Waste Management Authority
Council Member Luna announced that he was elected the vice president of the IWMA at the last
meeting.
F. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: None
CC 5/25/99
Page 10 of 11
Approved as submitted
DATE: 07/13/99
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: Continued
4. Set Date for Redevelopment Hearing - Fiscal Impact: None (Staff recommendation:
Council adopt Resolution No. 1999-028, setting June 29, 1999 as the date of the joint
public hearing on the redevelopment plan) [Paul Saldana]
Mr. Saldafia briefly presented the staff recommendation.
PUBLIC COMMENT: None
MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Arrambide to adopt Resolution No. 1999-028, setting June 29, 1999 as
the date of the joint public hearing on the redevelopment plan.
Motion passed 3:0 by a roll-call vote.
(Clay, Lerno abstained)
G. ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Johnson adjourned the City Council meeting at 11:27 p.m. to the next Regular Session
scheduled on June 8, 1999.
MEETING RECORDED BY:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Cl k
MINUTES PREPARED BY:
�Z�db.&d
Melanie Whaley, Deputy City Cler
ATTACHMENTS: A-Prepared Statement of Ruth Rentschler.
B-Handout of Bill Zimmerman's.
CC 5/25/99
Page 11 of 11
City of Atascadero
City Council Meeting
May 25, 1999 Minutes
Attachment A
My name is Ruth Rentschler; I live at 6004 San Palo Road in Atascadero,
immediately adjacent to the project under discussion, Conditional Use
Permit #99002.
I am speaking in favor of the appeal by Mr. Zimmerman of the Planning
Commission"s approval to allow an automobile sales lot at 5000 San Palo
Road.
There is a reason a used car lot requires a conditional use permit in a
CT zoning area. It is out of place here and should be restricted to a
more compatible area, it's present location for instance. . The city has
an abundance of these lots now.
I don't see how another used car lot would make our city more attractive
to tourists, who, I 'm sure do not come here to go car shopping as a rule.
An attractive motel, not cabins behind a car lot, would be a better choice
coupled with an up-scale restaurant to attract tourists.
But, if you decide not to agree with me I request consideration and
protection for the long established residential neighborhood.
Screening with plants and trees or fencing and elimination of the not
required southeasterly driveway facing my property combined with some
kind of traffic control would greatly decrease the impact.
Planning Staff's recommendations explain in more detail the sensitivity of
this issue,
Noise and lighting standards should also be addressed,
I hope the City Council will seriouly consider the impact this project
would have on the neighborhood and the city and instead consider a more
attractive use for everyone concerned, tourists and residents.
+ City of Atascadero
City Council Meeting
May 25, 1999 Minutes
- Attachment B
Section 10. Roll Call Vote.
A roll call vote shall be taken upon the passage of all
resolutions, and be entered in the minutes of the Commission
showing those Commission members voting aye, those voting no, and
those not voting or absent. Upon the request of any Commission
member, a roll call -vote shall be taken and recorded on any vote.
The call of the roll shall not be interrupted. Any member of the
Commission may change his/her vote before the next order of
business is taken up.
Section 11 . Affect of Tie Votes.
(a) Legislative Actions : The affect of a tie vote on a
k matter before the -Planning Commission where the Commission is
acting in a legislative capacity shall constitute "no
recommendation" on the -part of the Commission. The item shall be
x transmitted to the City Council for their action with no
ecommendation from the Commission.
(b) Adjudicatory Actions: The affect of a tie vote on a
matter before the Planning Commission where the Commission is
acting in an adjudicatory capacity shall constitute a denial on
the part of the Commission. Said denial shall be final unless
the matter is appealed to the City Council.
Section 12. Quorum.
A majority of the Commission shall constitute a quorum for the
transaction of business. When there is no quorum for a regular
, meeting, the Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson, or any Commission
member shall adjourn such meeting, or, if no Commission member is
present, the Community Development Director shall adjourn the
meeting. ,
Section 13. Preparation of Minutes.
The minutes of the Commission shall be kept by the Community
Development Director or his/her assistant and shall be neatly
produced and kept in a file for that purpose, with a record of each
particular type of business transacted set off in paragraphs with
proper subheads; provided, however, the Community Development
Director shall be required to make a record only of such business
as was actually passed upon by a vote of the Commission and shall
not be required to record any remarks of Commission members or of
any other person; and, provided further, the Community Development
Director shall* attempt to record the names and addresses of persons
addressing the Commission, the title of the subject matter to which
their remarks related, and whether they spoke in support of or in
opposition to such matter.
a
Whenever the Commission acts in a quasi-judicial proceeding such as
in certain zoning matters, the Community Development Director shall
compile a summary of the testimony of the witnesses.
Section. 14 . Reading of the Minutes.
Unless the reading of the minutes of a regular meeting is requested
by a Commission member, such minutes may be approved without
reading if the Community Development Director has
previously furnished each Commission member with a copy thereof.
Section 15. Rules of Debate.
(a) Presiding officer may debate and vote. The presiding
officer may move, second, and debate from the chair, subject only
to such limitations of debate as are by these rules imposed on all
Commission members, and shall not be deprived of any of the rights
and privileges of a Commission member by reason of his/her acting
as the presiding officer.
(b) Getting the floor: Improper references. Every
Commission member desiring to speak shall address the chair and,
upon recognition by the presiding officer, shall confine himself or
herself to the question under debate, avoiding all personalities
and indecorous language.
(c) Interruptions_. A Commission member once recognized shall
not be interrupted when speaking unless it shall be to call him or
her to order or -as otherwise provided by this section. If a
Commission member, while speaking, shall be called to order, he or
she shall cease speaking until the question of order has been
determined and, if in order, he or she shall be permitted to
proceed.
(d) Basic Chart of Motions. The attached chart shall govern
the Commission's actions on motions.
(e) Motions to reconsider. A motion to reconsider any action .�
taken by the Commission at a regular meeting may be made only on
the day such action was taken or at the, next succeeding adjourned
or regular.•meeting provided it is listed on the posted agenda.
Such a motion shall be made by one of the prevailing side but may
be seconded by any Commission member and may be made at any time.
It shall be debatable. Nothing in this section shall be construed
to prevent any Commission member from making or remaking the same
or another motion at a subsequent meeting of the Commission.
Section 16. Addressing the Commission.
Any person desiring to address the Commission during a regular
meeting shall first secure the permission of the presiding officer
5