HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 010898 - Joint CityMINUTES
' SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCILS AND
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
Thursday, January 8, 1998
7:00 p.m. — Regular Session
Atascadero Lake Park Pavilion
9315 Pismo Ave.
Atascadero, California
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING: 7:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Carden
Mayor Carden, Atascadero, called the Special Joint Meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Color Presentation and Pledge of Allegiance led by Boy Scout
Troop #155, sponsored by the Atascadero Knights of Columbus.
ROLL CALL:
City ofArrovo Grande
City ofAtascadero
City of Grover Beach
Mayor A. K. "Pete " Dougall
Mayor Harold L. Carden, III
Mayor Dee Santos
Michael Lady
Ray Johnson
Robert Reed
Michael Fuller
George Luna
Henry E. "Gene" Gates
Thomas A. Runels
Jerry L. Clay, Sr.
Peter Keith
Steve Tolley
Kenneth Lerno
Ronald Arnoldsen
City of Morro Bay
City of Paso Robles
City of Pismo Beach
Mayor Cathy Novak
Mayor Duane J. Picanco
Mayor John Brown
Rodger Anderson
Tom Baron
Marian Mellow
Dave Elliott
Walter J. Macklin
Hal Halldin
William Peirce
Lee Swanson
Bill Rabenaldt
Janice Peters
Christian E. Iversen
Mary Ann Reiss
City of San Luis Obispo
County of San Luis Obispo
Mayor Allen K Settle
Chairwoman Ruth Brackett
Bill Roalman
Harry L. Ovitt
Dave Romero
Bud Laurent.
Dodie Williams
Peg Pinard
Kathy Smith
Mike Ryan
Joint Councils/Supervisors Meeting
01/08/98
Page 1 of 8
Marcia Torgerson, City Clerk, Atascadero, called roll. All the above-mentioned members were
present except the following:
Council Members Arnoldsen and Gates, Grover Beach; Council Members Baron, Iversen and
Swanson, Paso Robles; Council Member Roalman, San Luis Obispo; and Supervisors Brackett
and Laurent, San Luis Obispo County.
MANAGER'S/ADMINISTRATOR'S PRESENT:
Robert Hunt, Arroyo Grande; Wade McKinney, Atascadero; David Cole, Morro Bay; James
App, Paso Robles; Mike Fuson, Pismo Beach; John Dunn, San Luis Obispo; and Clark Channing
(Interim), San Luis Obispo County.
OTHERS PRESENT:
Senior clerk to the Board of Supervisors Vicki Shelby, San Luis Obispo County; City Clerk
Bonnie Gawf, San Luis Obispo; City Attorney Roy Hanley, Atascadero; and City Clerk Marcia
Torgerson, Atascadero.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
MOTION: By Mayor Settle, San Luis Obispo and seconded by Council Member
Reed, Grover Beach, to approve the agenda.
Motion passed unanimously by a voice vote.
COMMUNITY FORUM:
Susan Litteral, Atascadero, Secretary of the Water Resources Advisory Committee, stated that
the Committee is working on the update to the County Master Water Plan. She stressed that it is
important that input to the Plan comes from throughout the County. She encouraged the
Councils/Board to actively participate in this process.
Ray Jansen, Atascadero, read excerpts of a letter that he has sent to all the Council
Members/Supervisors. The letter expressed his concerns of how government is changing.
Peggy Wilson, Animal News Network, Oceano, spoke concerning importance of funding
spay/neuter programs. She announced that "Spay Day" begins on February 16th and ends on
March 30th
Dennis Schmidt, Atascadero, spoke concerning the Air Pollution Control District. He asked that
the Councils/Supervisors look at the content of the Clean Air Plan (CAP), including the goals
and policies of the CAP. Also, he noted that the CAP discriminates against projects that each of
the communities have been adopting.
--End COMMUNITY FORUM—
Joint Councils/Supervisors Meeting
01/08/98
Page 2 of 8
Chairman Ryan, San Luis Obispo County, stated that the Board of Supervisors are very glad to
be present tonight. He announced that the Board of Supervisors are going to participate in
discussions but will not be taking any action tonight. They will take any action that is taken here
back to the full Board and take action on it at a later date. He also said that has had a discussion
with Mayor Carden, Atascadero, regarding the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors attending
the Mayor's meetings and he feels this will be a positive step towards the sharing of ideas within
the County.
A. ACTION ITEMS:
A JOINT RESOLUTION URGING THE STATE LEGISLATURE AND THE
GOVERNOR TO APPROVE RESTORING OF PROPERTY TAXES.
[Robert Reed, Councilmember of Grover Beach, will give background]
[Allen Settle, Mayor of San Luis Obispo, will give report and present resolution]
Recommendation: Approve Joint Resolution.
Time: 30 minutes
Council Member Reed, Grover Beach, gave background information on this item.
Mayor Settle, San Luis Obispo, stated that the purpose of this Joint Resolution is to encourage
The State Legislature to place on their agenda for this term a measure asking for the return of
these funds to cities. He explained that the Joint Resolution could be modified.
MOTION: Mayor Settle, San Luis Obispo, moved to approve the Joint Resolution urging
the State Legislature and the Governor to Approve Restoring of Property Taxes.
Council Member Romero, San Luis Obispo, suggested changing of title of the Joint Resolution
by eliminating "And Authorizing Restored Property Taxes" and "Such As Public Safety And
Public Works", but leaving in "To Be Used For Local Government Needs." He also suggested
eliminating in the sixth paragraph, "such as public safety and public works construction and
maintenance." Mayor Settle, San Luis Obispo, agreed with the suggested amendments and asked
that his motion be amended to include them.
SECOND: Council Member Romero, San Luis Obispo, seconded the motion including the
following amendments:
1. In the title, eliminate "And Authorizing Restored Property Taxes" and
"Such As Public Safety And Public Works"; but leave in "To Be Used
For Local Government Needs. "
2. In the sixth paragraph, eliminate "such as public safety and public
works construction and maintenance."
Mayor Carden, Atascadero, stated that, before accepting the motion, he wanted to discuss the
letter that Chairman Ryan, San Luis Obispo County, had sent to all mayors (see Attachment A).
Supervisor Ovitt, San Luis Obispo County, read and explained portions of Chairman Ryan's
letter as some members had not received it. He stated that the Board's main concerns were: 1)
Joint Councils/Supervisors Meeting
01/08/98
Page 3 of 8
They needed to include the agreed upon approach of the League of California Cities and the
California State Association of Counties which would focus on the state capping the property tax
shift (ERAF) at a base year and return the growth amount to local government, and 2) They
needed to amend the language that would earmark the funds. In doing so, the funds could go
back to the general funds for the discretion of the local entities.
Mayor Settle, San Luis Obispo, stated that he agreed with Supervisor Ovitt's comments.
Mayor Novak, Morro Bay, stated that she felt that if the State will not return some of the ERAF
monies, one possible approach would be that by earmarking the funds for public works and
public safety, the State would consider the return of some of the funds.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Gere Sibbach, County Auditor/Controller, asked the Council Members/Supervisors to remember
that the ERAF transfer also affected special districts, not just cities and counties. He suggested
adding special districts, at a minimum the County library system which lost approximately 10%
of its total funding.
Alice Porter, 9420 Marchant Way, asked is this Joint Resolution affects Proposition 13. Mayor
Carden answered, no.
Eric Greening, Atascadero, stated he agreed with Mr. Sibbach that the library took a large cut
and that should be restored. He stated that he supported this Joint Resolution as amended.
--End PUBLIC COMMENT—
Lengthy discussion ensued including clarification of wording.
Mayor Novak, Morro Bay, asked that the motion be repeated in full including the amendments to
the Joint Resolution. Council Member Romero, San Luis Obispo, reviewed the motion.
The motion passed unanimously by a voice vote.
2. A JOINT RESOLUTION CONCERNING FEDERAL REGULATION
COORDINATION AND PERMITTING RELATIVE TO FLOOD PREVENTION.
[Allen Settle, Mayor of San Luis Obispo, will give report and present resolution]
Recommendation: Approve Joint Resolution.
Time: 30 minutes
Mayor Settle, San Luis Obispo, gave a brief report regarding this item. He reviewed the
proposed amendments suggested in the letter from Chairman Ryan, San Luis Obispo County (see
Attachment A). He stated that he found the proposed amendments generally acceptable.
MOTION: Mayor Settle, San Luis Obispo, moved to adopt the revised Joint Resolution(see
Attachment A) that will improve the permit process so as to protect our county,
Joint Councils/Supervisors Meeting
01/08/98
Page 4 of 8
its citizens and propertyfrom flood damage through an improved permit
process.
SECOND: Council Member Williams, San Luis Obispo seconded the motion.
Council Member Luna, Atascadero, asked for clarification of the wording in the Joint Resolution
in the paragraph starting with, "NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED."
Mayor Settle, San Luis Obispo, explained that the process is much more streamlined. The idea is
to have the Federal Government to recognize a unified permit that will allow us the flexibility to
protect our property without having to go back on a yearly basis for renewals.
Tim Nanson, County Engineer, San Luis Obispo, confirmed that any decision the Army Corps of
Engineers makes, can be appealed by the EPA. They also have to go through multiple other
agencies to receive approval, i.e. Fish and Wildlife Service and FEMA.
Ron DeCarli, Executive Director of SLOCOG staff, explained that under the ISTEA passed in
1990, there were several streamlining provisions. The most important was early consultation and
delegation of portions or the responsibilities.
PUBLC COMMENT
Eric Greening, Atascadero, urged the Councils/Supervisors to table this issue until they get more
information.
--End PUBLIC COMMENT—
Council Member Luna, Atascadero, asked that the wording he questioned earlier be deleted.
Mayor Settle, San Luis Obispo, stated that he would have no problem deleting the wording in the
last three lines in the paragraph Council Member Luna is concerned with and adding, "to follow
reasonable and expeditious standards." Council Member Williams, San Luis Obispo (the
second) agreed.
Mayor Carden, Atascadero, repeated the motion for clarification: Adopt the revised Joint
Resolution( see Attachment A) with the amendment to delete the last three lines of the paragraph
starting with, "NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED" and adding, "California to follow
reasonable and expeditious standards."
Motion passed unanimously by a voice vote.
3. A RECOMMENDATION THAT THE CITIES AND COUNTY SUPPORT IN
CONCEPT THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO GAIN GREATER FISCAL
STABILITY FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT.
[Cathy Novak, Mayor of Morro Bay, will give report]
Joint Councils/Supervisors Meeting
01/08/98
Page 5 of 8
Recommendations: 1. The Cities and County support in concept the constitutional
amendment.
2. Each City and County individually support, by resolution, the
final constitutional amendment package presented to the
Legislature.
Time: 30 minutes
Mayor Novak, Morro Bay, gave a brief report and explained her recommendations.
There was brief discussion on this item and Mayor Novak clarified her request to the members.
MOTION: Council Member Reed, Grover Beach, moved to conceptually support the
constitutional amendment, and that the cities and counties along with CSAC
and the League of California Cities, work towards a united effort.
SECOND: By Council Member Luna, Atascadero.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Michael Kovacs, unincorporated Atascadero, questioned the need for this item.
Gere Sibbach, County Controller/Auditor, asked if the motion, as it is presented now, going to
support a constitutional amendment or is it in support of specific language only. Mayor Carden
responded that the motion is to conceptually support the constitutional amendment and work
with CSAC and the League towards a united effort. Mr. Sibbach stated that he had some
concerns regarding the language.
Bob Rose, Templeton, stated that he did not believe that we need another constitutional
amendment. He suggested that what we need is to elect legislators that recognize where state
government, city and county government borders exist.
--End PUBLIC COMMENT—
Mayor Novak, Morro Bay, clarified for the public that this constitutional amendment would
require a two thirds vote of both houses to be passed. She also stated that to have it on the
November 1998 ballot would require a 50% voter approval.
There was brief discussion on this item.
Motion passed unanimously by a voice vote.
B. INFORMATION ITEMS:
1. ELECTRIC INDUSTRY DE -REGULATION: AN INFORMATIONAL BRIEFING ON
OPTIONS FACING LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.
[Cathy Novak, Mayor of Morro Bay, will give information presentation]
[Allen Settle, Mayor of San Luis Obispo, will present request of aggregating possibilities]
Joint Councils/Supervisors Meeting
01/08/98
Page 6 of 8
Recommendation: City Managers explore all options and report back findings to all
Cities and County within four months.
Time: 30 minutes
Mayor Novak, Morro Bay, gave a brief report and explained her recommendation. She
explained that she felt that the City Managers/County Administrator should work together and
explore all options.
MOTION: By Mayor Novak, Morro Bay, to approve Item #13-1.
SECOND: By Mayor Brown, Pismo Beach.
--No PUBLIC COMMENT—
There was brief discussion on this item.
Motion passed unanimously by a voice vote.
Mayor Carden, Atascadero, stated that he thinks they have set a record tonight. He went on to
say that since there is still time left, he would accept short closing comments.
Mayor Brown, Pismo Beach, stated he appreciated the efforts of the Atascadero City
management, especially the City Clerk's office, for putting this facility at our disposal with all
the arrangements.
Chairman Ryan, San Luis Obispo County, thanked the Cities for inviting the County to this
meeting. He stated that they will take the Joint Resolutions that the Cities have passed tonight
and put them on their agenda and take action on them as soon as possible.
Mayor Novak, Morro Bay, stated she agreed with Mayor Brown, Pismo Beach, and thanked the
the Cities and the County Board members who attended.
Mayor Dougall, Arroyo Grande, welcomed Chairman Ryan, San Luis Obispo County, and stated
he agrees with the Chairman joining the mayors' meeting.
Mayor Settle, San Luis Obispo, stated that he agrees with the previous speakers and looks
forward to the next meeting. He expressed his hope that they all follow-up on the items
discussed tonight.
Council Member Reed, Grover Beach, thanked all who attended and help bring information to
the meeting. He also thanked Atascadero for hosting the event.
Mayor Santos, Grover Beach, invited Chairman Ryan to the next mayors' meeting.
Mayor Picanco, Paso Robles, stated he agrees with the previous speakers and moved to adjourn
the meeting.
Mayor Carden, Atascadero, thanked everyone for coming. He stated that Chairman Ryan will be
Joint Councils/Supervisors Meeting
01/08/98
Page 7 of 8
1
present at the next mayors' meeting. He also thanked the Atascadero City staff for coordinating
this meeting.
ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Carden adjourned the Special Joint Meeting of the City Councils
and the Board of Supervisors of San Luis Obispo County at 8:25.p.m.
MINUTES RECORDED AND PREPARED BY:
Oletl� 012,
—Ti2
Marcia M. Torgerson, City Cle
ATTACHMENTS: A — Letter from Chairman Ryan, dated 1/6/98
Joint Councils/Supervisors Meeting
01/08/98
Page 8 of 8
COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, Room 370 • SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA 93408-2040 • 805.781.5450
January 6, 1998
Mayor Harold L. Carden
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Ave.
Atascadero, CA 93422
Dear Mayor Carden:
RECEIVED
JAN -- 81998
I
!ATASCADERO CITY MANAGER
HARRY L. OVITT, Supervisor District One
LAURENCE L. LAURENT, Supervisor District Two
PEG PINARD, Supervisor District Three
RUTH E. BRACKETT, Supervisor District Four
MICHAEL P. "MIKE" RYAN, Supervisor District Five
On behalf of the San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors, I would like to express our
appreciation for being invited to participate in the January 8 Joint Cities/County meeting. A
majority of our Board has indicated that they will be in attendance in the capacity of a "Committee
of the Whole." We welcome the opportunity to join in discussions on the various topics included
on the agenda you forwarded to us. To this end, we have reviewed the agenda items and would like
to offer the following preliminary comments:
A-1 A Joint Resolution Urging the State Legislature and the Governor to Approve Restoring of
Property Taxes.
Board Comments:
We believe it is important to be in sync with the actions being taken on a statewide
basis by the League of California Cities(League) and the California State Association
of Counties(CSAC). At the recently concluded CSAC Annual Meeting in San Mateo
a report was given that CSAC and the League were jointly working on a common
approach to this issue. More recently, we were informed that this common approach
was further explored in a CSAC/League Joint Task Force on Revenue meeting in
December(minutes attached). That meeting resulted in an agreed upon approach to
this issue which would focus on the state capping the property tax shift (ERAF) at
a base year and returning the growth amount to local government. The proposed
resolution included in the material sent to us,for the January 8 meeting does not
include this element, i.e. returning the growth. Further, the proposed resolution calls
upon the Governor and the Legislature to restore the property taxes to meet local
needs such as public safety, building, and the maintenance of public facilities. Such
language could lead to "earmarking" of funds which might be restored. The effort
being undertaken by CSAC and the League contains no earmarking provisions and
will urge the return of the growth amount as strictly discretionary revenue. We
would recommend that our joint meeting endorse the noted effort by CSAC and the
League rather that adopting the specific resolution included in the material.
A-2 A Joint Resolution Concerning Federal Regulation Coordination and Permitting Relative to
Flood Prevention.
Board Comments:
We would propose certain revisions in the resolution. To highlight these for you, we
have included a strike out version, noting the revisions, and a full "clean . copy."
These revisions add certain clarification verbiage to note references to the "Clean
Water Act" and to a letter sent by Governor Wilson to President Clinton in October
relative to avoiding a repeat of San Luis Obispo County's situation wherein we were
approved for emergency work by numerous Federal and State agencies, only to be
sued by the Environmental Protection Agency for having done the work without
proper permits. The revision also proposes to substitute clarification- language-
relative
anguagerelative to the freedom of the Department of the Army "not to issue permits" with the
highlighted language shown just above the strikeout section. This new section also
addresses the insufficiency of congressional funding to properly implement the
permit review process. Finally, in the first `BE IT RESOLVED" section, two minor,
additions are included to indicate that expedition of the permit process is needed
especially during emergencies, and the necessary work also includes road systems.
A-3 A Joint Resolution to Support The League of California Cities' Campaign to Freeze the
State's Taking From Local Funding Sources.
Board Comments:
The memo from Mayor Novak of Morro Bay spoke to the general issue of fiscal
stability. Attached to the memo was a draft constitutional amendment put together
by the League of California Cities tentatively entitled "Right to Fiscal Stability."
The Mayor's memo recommends that: (1) the Cities and County support in concept
the constitutional amendment to gain greater fiscal stability for local government;
and (2) Each ' City and County individually support, by resolution, the final
constitutional amendment package presented to the Legislature. This proposed
constitutional amendment was also the subject of the recent CSAC/League Joint Task
Force on Revenues. It was agreed at the meeting that the proposed amendment
would be modified by the League to include the element of a cap on the growth of
the property tax shift (ERAF). With this proviso, the proposed amendment would
be jointly supported by the League and CSAC, as would CSAC's effort, noted, above
in Staff Comments associated with item A-1, to get that growth returned to local
government. We would recommend our joint meeting conceptually support such an
amendment, but based upon a unified effort by the County and Cities to support
language as agreed upon by CSAC and the League of California Cities.
B-1 Electric Industry Deregulation: An Informational Briefing on Options Facing Local
Governments.
Board Comments:
The thrust of this item calls for a consolidation of efforts by the Cities and County
which would encompass and maximize potential savings in the purchase of
electricity following deregulation. The. County's General Services Department is
heading up our effort in this regard. In discussing this matter with the General
Services Director' we were informed that savings in electrical power costs will
depend on several factors, and that at this time we do not have sufficient information
to determine if a solo joint Cities/County effort would result in an economy of scale
sufficient to generate significant savings. It may take further aggregation with other
units of government, such as the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) or
perhaps with the State. In this respect, certain coordination efforts have already been
initiated by the City Managers and the County Administrator, and more recently by
SLOCOG. We are certainly in favor of exploring and enhancing this collaborative
effort. On an "on -the -ground" basis, it would be helpful if the various Cities'
departments charged with this effort contact and coordinate their activities with the
County General Services Department.
Again, Mayor Carden, we look forward to Thursday's meeting, and to the potential of future such
meetings. In this latter regard, we believe it would be productive for such future meetings if the
Chairperson of the Board of Supervisors were included in the development of the agendas for the
meetings. To this end I look forward to working with you and the other mayors to usher in a new
era of cooperation and coordination among our organizations.
Sincerely,
MICHAEL P. "MIKE" RYAN, Chairman
Board of Supervisors
attachments
cc: Each City Mayor
c:wpwin\wpdocskmrMarden.1tr/m1
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCILS OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
AND THE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
URGING THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES TO STREAMLINE THE
PROCESS LOCAL AGENCIES MUCH FOLLOW TO OBTAIN PERMITS TO
CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS TO REPAIR DAMAGE CAUSED BY
DISASTROUS FLOODING AND TO PROTECT IMPROVED AND
UNIMPROVED WATERWAYS FROM FUTURE FLOOD DAMAGE
WHEREAS, the Federal Government has adopted the National Environmental Policy Act
Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Government did thereby assume regulatory authority over
placement of fill and excavation of material from within all waterways and wetlands and
protection of biological organisms. living within the waterways and wetlands; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Government has defined all work to, in, on or within those
waterways and wetlands to be under their jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, local agencies are thus required to obtain permission of the Federal
Government prior to addressing the needs of their citizens; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Government has spread the implementation of the National
Environmental Policy Clean Water Act and Endangered Species Act among a myriad of agencies
and under a myriad of regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Government has established the Department of the Interior and
the Department of Commerce and assigned them the responsibility to protect certain wildlife; and
WHEREAS, the Department of the Interior has not established guidelines, for its
assigned area of responsibility, that allow the local agency to address the needs of its -citizens; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Commerce has not established guidelines, for its assigned
area of responsibility, that allow the local agency to address the needs of its citizens; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Army is given authority. to issue permits prior to any
dredging or filling in waterways or wetlands,'and has adopted certain Nationwide Permits; and
WHEREAS, the Department of the Army has not issued permits or issued permits
expeditiously for projects in accordance with either its Exemption or Natior_wide Permit system
protocols, even though said projects are consistent with regulations under its authority, and
WHEREAS, the Department of the Army has stated that Congress has not provided
sufficient funds to properly implement the review process, and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Protection Agency has the authority to direct the
Department of the Army to restrict or reject a permit application; and
WHEREAS, the current practice of issuing permits has not been effective in either
protecting the environment or the -citizens within urban areas due to internal Federal
inconsistencies, missing communication, and non-existent. coordination; and
WHEREAS, Governor Pete Wilson in a letter addressed to President Clinton on October
6, 1997 urged that "A clearly stated policy is needed to avoid a repeat of San Luis Obispo
County's situation, when the County had approval from numerous Federal and State Agencies for
emergency work only to be sued by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency'; and
WHEREAS, local agencies must prepare plans, conduct environmental studies and
hearings to meet the already strict requirements of the State of California regarding protection of
the environment; and
WHEREAS, the local agency, with clear, concise Federal guidelines and adopted
standards from the State of California, via its permitting process, could enforce the Federal
regulations thus enhancing the process and eliminating the confusion and frustration created by
multiple Federal permitting agencies; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Councils )'the cities of San
Luis Obispo County and the County Board of Supervisors that we urge the ?resident and
Congress of the United State of America to move forthrightly and expeditiously to simplify the
process of permitting, especially during emergencies, the work necessary in lakes, creeks,
waterways, wetlands and to road systems by directing the agencies to adopt fair and equitable
standards for use in California and delegate authority to the local agencies and to the State of
California to follow those reasonable standards in the process of meeting the needs of their
citizens in a way similar to the process the Department of Transportation established for
implementation of the ISTEA program for the construction and maintenanc- of highways.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Councils and the Board of Supervisors of
San Luis Obispo County believe this matter is of great urgency for the units of local government
and is of the highest public interest both to people residing within cities and counties and
therefore, to the citizens of the United States.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Arroyo Grande
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Atascadero
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Grover Beach
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Morro Bay
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Paso Robles
ATTEST: .
Mayor, City of Pismo Beach
City Clerk
,ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of San Luis Obispo
ATTEST:
County Clerk
Chair, County Board of Supervisors
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCILS OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
AND THE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
URGING THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES TO STREAMLINE THE
PROCESS LOCAL AGENCIES MUCH FOLLOW TO OBTAIN PERMITS TO
CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS TO REPAIR DAMAGE CAUSED BY .
DISASTROUS FLOODING AND TO PROTECT IMPROVED AND
UNIMPROVED WATERWAYS FROM FUTURE FLOOD DAMAGE
WHEREAS, the Federal Government has adopted the National Environmental Policy Act
?ti1fi and the Endangered Species Act; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Government did thereby assume regulatory authority over
placement of fill and excavation of material from within all waterways and wetlands and
protection of biological organisms living within the waterways and wetlands; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Government has defined all work to, in, on or within those.
waterways and wetlands to be under their jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, local agencies are thus required to obtain permission of the Federal
Government prior to addressing the needs of their citizens; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Government has spread the implementation of the National
Environmental Policyteat y :ate 'f? C. and Endangered Species Act among a myriad of agencies
and under a myriad of regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Government has established the Department of the Interior and
the Department of Commerce and assignment* i ed them the responsibility to protect certain
wildlife; and
WHEREAS, the Department of the Interior has not established guidelines, for its
assigned area of responsibility, that allow the local agency to address the needs of its citizens; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Commerce has not established guidelines, for its assigned
area of responsibility, that allow the local agency to address the needs of its citizens; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Army is given authority to issue permits prior to any
dredging or filling in waterways or wetlands, and has adopted certain Nationwide Permits; and
W>l�l�.AS,.ttt� l�epar�;m��:��th� �rtny.has nit, �s�ued p�rmitS. Ar. �ssu�:�,;p��t��
:C:.;ryvr::i r;•:.•:.v•{:r.}:•}:ti::.}}:•i:::!•i:•}i:•}}•::::: r: •::.y:::rtr.Y i.; ::::::::r::::::::::::.�{::::::::::•:::................:: ::: ..:::: rrrr.:..•
.•.rr:.•.::.. .t .i.: .. .... .... .......:::::::.i.::.s,s vr: Lx:.:..v:.�: nv..... ...... n{.........�. .. ..: .. :�.. {;:.}:¢}:w•••i:•i: ;v{tiry;J;.}::{•.i::}::::: i::i::i�:::. :' ::'. ... .{i: •::...•: ::..{... {{; .... .. .....
.:... •'ed�tbua�C :�ciz� :t`d�'�ota trt���'��z`dari��Wxlh<:exlhex tts:z�ezn tibrt �r�€atzoc..lv�i��'�.r:;f:<..:5>�m
•..: x...... "':ti4:£{f:i:4:•}i:•i}i}'r'::......:: ..........: ..: .:. v::.•ry x:4y.}:•}:::w}};.}w::.:'•%:•i:':S�'4:•}:'r:•}'4::?:"i:':{4i::{{^}i:•:::-}}}•: •.:.; wni•::::.:.: y.: nr :}::.ii'•}{�:•:
... /... ;,,{;}}}::.: ...::: ..... :......: ..::}:::iris: i.{{}i:{•}£,v,::;}'::::•}:..f.......:..::......}:::.}:•.•.:.:!... ...... ..i.....i..: y... ;....•....0;.:.i:•:.:.:r::.......::nr..:..+.•}:}:...:•.:::.: ::i:::;;ty:::{i}: : �.
pr��ocbls, even.though sai�,•Prglects a��.cons�stent with.regu�ations under zts;a�athont�,,and
C��AS,.��e�epa:ment,z�fth�At-myha� sta�ed�hat �ongress.`�a�•rtot fsr4vt�leti
stY..��;ct��i.�t���•tis,pi'�p;�rl�;�mp�etrlent,��er�rn.�w.prtrce�ss,• aid
WHEREAS, the Depa, tinent 9,11V lily has the freedom to not i0aU%. JJVA1111La fbll0*i1nP
theit own liationwide Permit syste tho urh that might be internally c'onsistent_vvith its
implementation of regulations undeL its authotity; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Protection Agency has the authority to direct the
Department of the Army to restrict or reject a permit application; and
WHEREAS, the current practice of issuing permits has not been effective in either
protecting the environment or the citizens within urban areas due to interne.l Federal
inconsistencies, missing communication, and non-existent coordination; and
WHEREAS, local agencies must prepare plans, conduct environmental studies and
hearings to meet the already strict requirements of the State of California regarding protection of
the environment; and
WHEREAS, the local agency, with clear, concise Federal guidelines and adopted
standards from the State of California, via its permitting process, could enforce the Federal
regulations thus enhancing the process and eliminating the confusion and frustration created by
multiple Federal permitting agencies; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Councils of the cities of San
Luis Obispo County and the County Board of Supervisors that we urge the President and
Congress of the United State of America to move forthrightly and expeditiously to simplify the
process of permittingthe work necessary in lakes, creeks,
waterways, andwetlands t i °road: steins by directing the agencies to adopt fair and equitable
standards for use in California and delegate authority to, the local agencies and to the State of
California to follow those reasonable standards in the process of meeting the needs of their
citizens in a way similar to the process the Department of Transportation established for
implementation of the ISTEA program for the construction and maintenan ;e of highways.
BE IT FURTHERRRESOLVED that the City Councils and the Board of Supervisors of
San Luis Obispo County believe this matter is of great urgency for the units of local government
and is of the highest public interest both to people residing within cities and counties and
therefore, to the citizens of the United States.
ATTEST:
City Clerk Mayor, City of Arroyo Grande
ATTEST:
City Clerk Mayor, City of Atascadero
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ATTEST:
Mayor, City of Grover Beach
Mayor, City of Morro Bay
Mayor, City of Paso Robles
Mayor, City of Pismo Beach
Mayor, City of San Luis Obispo
Chair, County Board of Supervisors
City Clerk
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ATTEST:
County Clerk
Mayor, City of Grover Beach
Mayor, City of Morro Bay
Mayor, City of Paso Robles
Mayor, City of Pismo Beach
Mayor, City of San Luis Obispo
Chair, County Board of Supervisors