HomeMy WebLinkAbout111312 CC Agenda-combined . yl
'a`$ i979CITY OF A TASCADERO
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
City Hall
Council Chambers
6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, California
City Council Closed Session: 5:30 p.m.
City Council Regular Session: 6:00 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION: 5:30 p.m.
1. CLOSED SESSION -- PUBLIC COMMENT
2. COUNCIL LEAVES CHAMBERS TO BEGIN CLOSED SESSION
3. CLOSED SESSION -- CALL TO ORDER
a. Conference with Legal Counsel — Existing Litigation
Government Code Section 54956.9(a)
Save Atascadero v. City of Atascadero, et al.
San Luis Obispo Superior Court Case No. 128230
4. CLOSED SESSION -- ADJOURNMENT
5. COUNCIL RETURNS TO CHAMBERS
6. CLOSED SESSION -- REPORT
REGULAR SESSION — CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Kelley
ROLL CALL: Mayor Kelley
Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley
Council Member Clay
Council Member Fonzi
Council Member Sturtevant
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call
PRESENTATIONS:
1. Proclamation: 25th Anniversary of Coats for Kids of San Luis Obispo
County
2. Proclamation: 75th Anniversary of American Association of University
Women - Atascadero Branch
A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (All items on the consent calendar are considered to
be routine and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion
if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If
comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the
consent calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an
opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the
item before action is taken. DRAFT MINUTES: Council meeting draft minutes
are listed on the Consent Calendar for approval of the minutes. Should anyone
wish to request an amendment to draft minutes, the item will be removed from
the Consent Calendar and their suggestion will be considered by the City
Council. If anyone desires to express their opinion concerning issues included in
draft minutes, they should share their opinion during the Community Forum
portion of the meeting.)
1. City Council Draft Action Minutes — October 23, 2012
■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Draft Action Minutes
of October 23, 2012. [City Clerk]
2. September 2012 Accounts Payable and Payroll
■ Fiscal Impact: $3,064,795.58.
■ Recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable,
payroll and payroll vendor checks for September 2012. [Administrative
Services]
3. September 2012 Investment Report
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council receive and file the City Treasurer's report for
quarter ending September 2012. [Administrative Services]
4. Library Impact Fees Distribution for New Library
■ Fiscal Impact: $20,430 expenditure of Library Impact Fees funds.
■ Recommendations: Council authorize the Director of Administrative
Services to appropriate $20,430 to be remitted to the San Luis Obispo
County Library to be used towards construction of tenant improvements in
the new Atascadero Library Facility. [Administrative Services]
5. Lift Station #2 Engineering Design Contract Award (Contract for
Professional Services
• Fiscal Impact: Up to $44,700 in budgeted wastewater funds.
■ Recommendations: Council authorize the City Manager to execute a
contract with Penfield and Smith, Incorporated for the design of Lift Station
#2 improvements for an amount not to exceed $44,700. [Public Works]
UPDATES FROM THE CITY MANAGER: (The City Manager will give an oral report on
any current issues of concern to the City Council.)
COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to
address the Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has
jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to three minutes. Please state your name for the
record before making your presentation. Comments made during Community Forum
will not be a subject of discussion. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for
Community Forum, unless changed by the Council. Any members of the public who
have questions or need information, may contact the City Clerk's Office, between the
hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at 470-3400, or mtorgerson atascadero.org.)
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Special Interchange Mitigation Fee Update (Santa Barbara Rd at Hwy
101 Interchange, Vieio Camino at EI Camino Real, and San Diego Way at
EI Camino Real)
■ Ex Parte Communications:
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendations: Council:
1. Receive this report on the Santa Barbara Road at Highway 101, Viejo
Camino at EI Camino Real, and San Diego Way at EI Camino Real
special transportation mitigation fees collected from the Dove Creek
and Las Lomas Developments; and,
2. Approve Draft Resolution A approving continued collection of special
fair share traffic mitigation fees for the Dove Creek and Las Lomas
developments to allow for the future installation of alternative US
101/Santa Barbara Road interchange improvements, and signalized
intersections at Viejo Camino at EI Camino Real and San Diego Road
and EI Camino Real. [Public Works]
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Atascadero Road Program Update
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council receive and file this report on the Atascadero
Road Program. [Public Works]
2. Historic City Hall Sidewalk (Design Standard Exception)
■ Fiscal Impact: The modifications of the Downtown Streetscape Standards
for the curb, gutter and sidewalk surrounding Historic City Hall will have a
slightly negative fiscal impact on the City.
■ Recommendation: Council approve modifications to the Downtown
Streetscape Standards for the curb, gutter and sidewalk surrounding
Historic City Hall, and direct staff to finalize the design process. [Public
Works]
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative, Council
Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities.
Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take
action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. The Council may
take action on items listed on the Agenda.)
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: (The following represent standing committees.
Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary):
Mayor Kelley
1. Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Committee
2. City of Atascadero Design Review Committee
3. City of Atascadero Finance Committee
4. County Mayors Round Table
5. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC)
6. Homeless Services Oversight Council
7. Oversight Board for the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment
Agency of Atascadero
Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley
1. City/ Schools Committee
2. Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA)
3. League of California Cities — CITIPAC Board Member
4. SLO Council of Governments (SLOCOG)
5. SLO Regional Transit Authority (SLORTA)
Council Member Fonzi
1. Air Pollution Control District
2. City of Atascadero Design Review Committee
3. City of Atascadero Finance Committee
4. SLO Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) - alternate
Council Member Sturtevant
1. City/ Schools Committee
2. Community Action Partnership of SLO County
3. League of California Cities — Council Liaison
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND / OR ACTION:
1. City Council
2. City Clerk
3. City Treasurer
4. City Attorney
5. City Manager
F. ADJOURNMENT:
Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that
person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. Correspondence submitted at this
public hearing will be distributed to the Council and available for review in the City Clerk's office.
I, Victoria Randall, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of perjury that
the foregoing agenda for the November 13, 2012 Regular Session of the Atascadero City Council was
posted on November 6, 2012, at the Atascadero City Hall, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA
93422 and was available for public review in the Customer Service Center at that location.
Signed this 6t" day of November, 2012, at Atascadero, California.
Victoria Randall, Deputy City Clerk
City of Atascadero
City of Atascadero
WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 6:00 p.m. unless there is a
Community Redevelopment Agency meeting commencing at 6:00 p.m. in which event the Council meeting will commence
immediately following the conclusion of the Community Redevelopment Agency meeting. Council meetings will be held at
the City Hall Council Chambers, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero. Matters are considered by the Council in the order of
the printed Agenda. Regular Council meetings are televised live, audio recorded and videotaped for future playback.
Charter Communication customers may view the meetings on Charter Cable Channel 20 or via the City's website at
www.atascadero.org. Meetings are also broadcast on radio station KPRL AM 1230. Contact the City Clerk for more
information (470-3400).
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file
in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public inspection during City Hall business hours at the Front Counter of
City Hall, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, and on our website, www.atascadero.org. An agenda packet is also
available for public review at the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road. Contracts, Resolutions and Ordinances will be
allocated a number once they are approved by the City Council. The minutes of this meeting will reflect these numbers.
All documents submitted by the public during Council meetings that are either read into the record or referred to in their
statement will be noted in the minutes and available for review in the City Clerk's office.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting
or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office or the City Clerk's Office, both at (805)
470-3400. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in
assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA
Under Agenda item, "COMMUNITY FORUM", the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having business with the
Council to approach the lectern and be recognized.
1. Give your name for the record (not required)
2. State the nature of your business.
3. All comments are limited to 3 minutes.
4. All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council.
5. No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any other
individual, absent or present
This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes will be
allowed for Community Forum (unless changed by the Council). If you wish to use a computer presentation to support
your comments, you must notify the City Clerk's office at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Digital presentations must
be brought to the meeting on a USB drive or CD. You are required to submit to the City Clerk a printed copy of your
presentation for the record. Please check in with the City Clerk before the meeting begins to announce your presence
and turn in the printed copy.
TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS (from Title 2, Chapter 1 of the Atascadero Municipal Code)
Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will give their
report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is open and
will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being considered to step up to the lectern. If
you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way:
1. You must approach the lectern and be recognized by the Mayor
2. Give your name (not required)
3. Make your statement
4. All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council
5. No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any other
individual, absent or present
6. All comments limited to 3 minutes
The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public comments will be
heard by the Council.
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 11-13-12
F1_ 09F-,lp n
o�
1915 R NOD
--- C�
E; � CITY OF ATASCADERO
CITY COUNCIL
DRAFT ACTION MINUTES
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
City Hall
Council Chambers
6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, California
City Council Regular Session: 6:00 p.m.
City Council Closed Session: Immediately following the
conclusion of the City
Council Regular Session
REGULAR SESSION — CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M.
Mayor Kelley called the meeting to order at 6.00 p.m. and Council Member Sturtevant
led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Council Members Clay, Fonzi, Sturtevant, Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley
and Mayor Kelley
Absent: None
Atascadero City Council
Draft Action Minutes of October 23,2012
Page 1 of 6
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 11-13-12
Others Present: City Clerk / Assistant to City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson
Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manager Jim Lewis,
Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard, Community
Development Director Warren Frace, Public Works Director Russ
Thompson, Community Services Director Brady Cherry, Police
Chief Jerel Haley, and City Attorney Brian Pierik.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
MOTION: By Council Member Sturtevant and seconded by Council
Member Fonzi to approve the agenda.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
PRESENTATIONS:
1. Recognition of State of California Special Training Award Recipients
This presentation was deferred to the next meeting.
2. Employee Service Awards
City Manager Wade McKinney presented the following employees with their service
awards-
5 Year Awards:
Charles Dickey, Building Inspector
Matt Chesson, Police Officer
Lynda Horejsi, Finance Technician
Mark Russo, Maintenance Worker
Lisa Cava, Administrative Assistant, City Manager's Office
15 Year Awards
Ellen Perkins, Administrative Assistant, Fire Department
Marcia Torgerson, Assistant to the City Manager
Wade McKinney, City Manager
Atascadero City Council
Draft Action Minutes of October 23,2012
Page 2 of 6
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 11-13-12
3. Advanced Meter Presentation by Southern California Gas
Representatives, Tim Mahoney and Scott Loveless
Mr. Mahoney and Mr. Loveless made a brief presentation and answered questions of
the Council.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. City Council Draft Action Minutes — October 9, 2012
■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Draft Action Minutes
of October 9, 2012. [City Clerk]
2. City Council Draft Action Closed Session Minutes — October 9, 2012
■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Draft Action Closed
Session Minutes of October 9, 2012. [City Clerk]
3. Proposed Amendments to Title 2 of the Atascadero Municipal Code
(AMC) Relating to Personnel System Rules and Election Issues
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendations: Council:
1. Adopt on second reading by title only Draft Ordinance A, amending
Title 2, Chapter 2 of the AMC relating to the Personnel System; and,
2. Adopt on second reading by title only Draft Ordinance B, amending
Title 2, Chapters 7 & 14 of the AMC relating to Election Issues. [City
Clerk]
MOTION: By Council Member Fonzi and seconded by Council Member
Clay to approve the Consent Calendar.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (#A-3.1: Ordinance No.
563, #A-3.2: Ordinance No. 564)
UPDATES FROM THE CITY MANAGER:
City Manager Wade McKinney gave an update on projects and issues within the City.
COMMUNITY FORUM:
The following citizens spoke during Community Forum: Tom Ferrell, Jim Patterson
(Exhibit A), and Karyn Sturtevant.
Mayor Kelley closed the COMMUNITY FORUM period.
Atascadero City Council
Draft Action Minutes of October 23,2012
Page 3 of 6
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 11-13-12
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None.
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Hotel Development at Home Depot Center — Agreement for Deferred
Payment of Development Fees
■ Fiscal Impact: As permits are processed, permit fees of approximately
$110,000 will be paid. The development fees of $610,220 will be paid
over a period of five years, instead of being paid at the completion of the
project. Also, a small amount of interest income would also be realized
annually of approximately $5,000.
■ Recommendation: Council approve the Agreement and related
documents, deferring payment of development fees over a period of five
years for construction of a 130-room suites hotel and banquet facility at
the Home Depot Center. [City Manager]
Assistant City Manager Jim Lewis gave the staff report and answered questions from
the Council.
Mark Hume, Chief Financial Officer of Westar, gave a brief presentation and answered
questions of the Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT: None
MOTION: By Mayor Kelley and seconded by Council Member Fonzi to
approve the Agreement and related documents, deferring
payment of development fees over a period of five years for
construction of a 130-room suites hotel and banquet facility at
the Home Depot Center.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Contract No. 2012-014)
2. Public Relations and Marketing Program
■ Fiscal Impact: The City Council approved at their August 14, 2012
meeting, $176,000 for the Promotions Program; appropriating $131,120
from General Fund Reserves and reallocating $44,880 from the Transfer
to RDA for Tourism Fund account.
■ Recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to negotiate and
execute a contract with the successful candidate for the Public Relations &
Marketing Program, with the effective date of November 1, 2012. [City
Manager]
City Manager Wade McKinney gave the staff report and answered questions from the
Council.
Atascadero City Council
Draft Action Minutes of October 23,2012
Page 4 of 6
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 11-13-12
Mark Elterman of Mental Marketing gave a brief presentation and answered questions
of the Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT: None
MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley and seconded by Council Member
Fonzi to authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a
contract with Mental Marketing and TJA Advertising for the
Public Relations & Marketing Program, with the effective date
of November 1, 2012.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Contract No. 2012-015)
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS:
The City Council Members made brief announcements.
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: None
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND / OR ACTION: None
F. ADJOURN TO CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION:
Mayor Kelley adjourned the meeting at 7:39 p.m. to the Closed Session.
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION: Immediately following the conclusion of the
City Council Regular Session
Mayor Kelley announced at 7:40 p.m. that the Council is going into Closed Session.
1. CLOSED SESSION -- PUBLIC COMMENT- None
2. COUNCIL LEAVES CHAMBERS TO BEGIN CLOSED SESSION
Atascadero City Council
Draft Action Minutes of October 23,2012
Page 5 of 6
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 11-13-12
3. CLOSED SESSION -- CALL TO ORDER
a. Conference with Legal Counsel — Existing Litigation
Government Code Section 54956.9(a)
Save Atascadero v. City of Atascadero, et al.
San Luis Obispo Superior Court Case No. 128230
4. CLOSED SESSION -- ADJOURNMENT
5. COUNCIL RETURNS TO CHAMBERS
6. CLOSED SESSION -- REPORT
City Attorney Pierik announced that there was no reportable action taken.
ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Kelley adjourned the meeting at 8:00 p.m.
MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C.
City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager
The following exhibit is available for review in the City Clerk's office:
Exhibit A— Flyer handout from Jim Patterson
Atascadero City Council
Draft Action Minutes of October 23,2012
Page 6 of 6
ITEM NUMBER: A- 2
\,k, DATE: 11/13/12
'T
k.
tacader® City Council
Staff Report - Administrative Services Department
September 2012 Accounts Payable and Payroll
RECOMMENDATION:
Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for
September 2012.
DISCUSSION:
Attached for City Council review and approval are the following:
Payroll
Dated 9/13/12 Checks # 29894 - 29919 $ 23,670.76
Direct Deposits 276,577.22
Dated 9/27/12 Checks # 29920 - 29944 16,040.10
Direct Deposits 266,989.57
Accounts Payable
Dated 9/1/12 - 9/30/12
Checks # 134542 - 134838
& EFTs 1165 - 1177 2,481,517.93
TOTAL AMOUNT $ 3,064,795.58
FISCAL IMPACT:
Total expenditures for all funds is $ 3,064,795.58
CERTIFICATION:
The undersigned certifies that the attached demands have been released for payment
and that funds are available for these dema ds '
FS t�
Rach lle Rickard, Director of Administrative Services
ATTACHMENT:
September 2012 Eden Warrant Register in the amount of $ 2,481,517.93
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
1165 09/04/2012 RABOBANK, N.A. Payroll Vendor Payment 68,482.70
1166 09/04/2012 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 19,728.68
1167 09/04/2012 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1,419.81
134542 09/07/2012 KELLYAREBALO Accounts Payable Check 363.70
134544 09/07/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 412.91
134545 09/07/2012 BERNARDS Accounts Payable Check 96,515.60
134546 09/07/2012 KATE CAPELA Accounts Payable Check 175.00
134547 09/07/2012 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Accounts Payable Check 4,066.80
134548 09/07/2012 DIANI BUILDING CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 418,290.76
134549 09/07/2012 EL CAMINO VETERINARY HOSP Accounts Payable Check 43.50
134550 09/07/2012 INGLIS PET HOTEL Accounts Payable Check 414.62
134551 09/07/2012 LISA WISE CONSULTING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 3,944.00
134552 09/07/2012 MANUEL MADRIGAL Accounts Payable Check 174.83
134553 09/07/2012 MADRONE LANDSCAPES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 7,592.76
134554 09/07/2012 PAULA MARTINEZ Accounts Payable Check 234.21
134555 09/07/2012 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 20.00
134556 09/07/2012 O'REILLYAUTOMOTIVE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 89.83
134557 09/07/2012 REPUBLIC ELEVATOR COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 68,490.00
134558 09/07/2012 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN Accounts Payable Check 33.95
134559 09/07/2012 TYSON VAN HORN Accounts Payable Check 112.60
134560 09/09/2012 AFSS Accounts Payable Check 25.00
134561 09/09/2012 AFSS SOUTHERN DIVISION Accounts Payable Check 50.00
134562 09/09/2012 AIRGAS USA, LLC Accounts Payable Check 150.40
134563 09/09/2012 AIR-RITE REFRIGERATION Accounts Payable Check 369.67
134564 09/09/2012 ALL SIGNS AND GRAPHICS, LLC Accounts Payable Check 125.65
134565 09/09/2012 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC Accounts Payable Check 143.22
134566 09/09/2012 ALPHA FIRE SPRINKLER CORP. Accounts Payable Check 65,317.76
134567 09/09/2012 AMERICAN WEST TIRE &AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 2,902,24
134568 09/09/2012 DAVID ANASTASIA Accounts Payable Check 266,88
134569 09/09/2012 KELLYAREBALO Accounts Payable Check 806.91
134570 09/09/2012 ASSC. OF ZOOS &AQUARIUMS Accounts Payable Check 47.50
134571 09/09/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 153.95
134573 09/09/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 472.34
134574 09/09/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 634.19
134575 09/09/2012 ATASCADERO HAY& FEED Accounts Payable Check 1,031.06
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listinq
For the Month of September 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
134576 09/09/2012 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 1,781.90
134577 09/09/2012 ATASCADERO TRAFFIC WAY STORAGE Accounts Payable Check 660.00
134578 09/09/2012 ATASCADERO UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST Accounts Payable Check 5,055.00
134579 09/09/2012 BASSETT'S CRICKET RANCH,INC. Accounts Payable Check 87.47
134580 09/09/2012 BERNARDS Accounts Payable Check 83,660.11
134581 09/09/2012 BERRY MAN, INC. Accounts Payable Check 612.10
134582 09/09/2012 BOB'S CRANE SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 4,575.00
134583 09/09/2012 SHIRLEY R. BRUTON Accounts Payable Check 165.00
134584 09/09/2012 BUTLER BUSINESS MACHINES Accounts Payable Check 698.11
134585 09/09/2012 CA CODE CHECK, INC. Accounts Payable Check 9,751.96
134586 09/09/2012 CA FIRE CHIEFS ASSC Accounts Payable Check 250.00
134587 09/09/2012 CAL-COAST REFRIGERATION, INC Accounts Payable Check 849.86
134588 09/09/2012 JASON F. CARR Accounts Payable Check 179.00
134589 09/09/2012 JASON F. CARR Accounts Payable Check 179.00
134590 09/09/2012 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS Accounts Payable Check 997.71
134591 09/09/2012 BRADY CHERRY Accounts Payable Check 300.00
134592 09/09/2012 KATHLEEN J. CINOWALT Accounts Payable Check 136.50
134593 09/09/2012 COAST ELECTRONICS Accounts Payable Check 1,069.59
134594 09/09/2012 COASTAL COPY, LP Accounts Payable Check 141.36
134595 09/09/2012 COASTAL REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 28.83
134596 09/09/2012 NICHOLAS E. COUGHLIN Accounts Payable Check 179.00
134597 09/09/2012 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 72.20
134598 09/09/2012 MATTHEW J. CURRY Accounts Payable Check 115.00
134599 09/09/2012 DAKOS LAND SURVEYS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,180.00
134600 09/09/2012 DARRYUS LOCK AND SAFE Accounts Payable Check 99.65
134601 09/09/2012 BRIAN S. DAVIN,JR. Accounts Payable Check 270.00
134602 09/09/2012 DISH NETWORK, LLC Accounts Payable Check 91.99
134603 09/09/2012 DMV RENEWAL Accounts Payable Check 89.00
134604 09/09/2012 DOWNEY BRAND, LLP Accounts Payable Check 73.00
134605 09/09/2012 ED'S FLY MEAT, LLC Accounts Payable Check 55.25
134606 09/09/2012 EIKHOF DESIGN GROUP, INC. Accounts Payable Check 970.00
134607 09/09/2012 ELECTRONIC GATE SYSTEMS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 75.00
134608 09/09/2012 ESCUELA DEL RIO Accounts Payable Check 160.00
134609 09/09/2012 FEDERAL EXPRESS Accounts Payable Check 50.82
134610 09/09/2012 FERRAVANTI GRADING& PAVING Accounts Payable Check 60,400.05
134611 09/09/2012 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 674.70
134612 09/09/2012 KEN FORMAN Accounts Payable Check 10.00
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
134613 09/09/2012 WARREN FRACE Accounts Payable Check 300.00
134614 09/09/2012 DAVID A. GARIBAY Accounts Payable Check 270.00
134615 09/09/2012 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 339.10
134616 09/09/2012 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 289,54
134617 09/09/2012 GLENN'S REPAIR & RENTAL Accounts Payable Check 321.25
134618 09/09/2012 GOLDEN STATE COPIER &MAILING Accounts Payable Check 56.51
134619 09/09/2012 BRADLEYA. HACKLEMAN Accounts Payable Check 643.50
134620 09/09/2012 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 217.88
134621 09/09/2012 HARVEY'S HONEYHUTS Accounts Payable Check 830.51
134622 09/09/2012 YVONNE HELMS Accounts Payable Check 14.00
134623 09/09/2012 VALERIE HUMPHREY Accounts Payable Check 31.08
134624 09/09/2012 J. CARROLL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 981.66
134625 09/09/2012 CAROL D. JANSSEN Accounts Payable Check 883.50
134626 09/09/2012 JIFFY LUBE Accounts Payable Check 25.84
134627 09/09/2012 JOE A. GONSALVES & SON Accounts Payable Check 3,000.00
134628 09/09/2012 BOB JOSLIN Accounts Payable Check 27.93
134629 09/09/2012 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER Accounts Payable Check 1,736.00
134630 09/09/2012 LANDSCAPES BY STACH Accounts Payable Check 250.00
134631 09/09/2012 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES Accounts Payable Check 475.92
134632 09/09/2012 DIANE LEVITAN, PH.D Accounts Payable Check 2,650.00
134633 09/09/2012 JAMES R. LEWIS Accounts Payable Check 250.00
134634 09/09/2012 LISA WISE CONSULTING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 4,175.00
134635 09/09/2012 GINA LUTZ Accounts Payable Check 200.00
134636 09/09/2012 MAINLINE UTILITY CO. Accounts Payable Check 1,500.00
134637 09/09/2012 BECKY MAXWELL Accounts Payable Check 66.99
134638 09/09/2012 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 500.00
134639 09/09/2012 GREGG T. MEYER Accounts Payable Check 179.00
134640 09/09/2012 MICHAEL K. NUNLEY&ASSC, INC. Accounts Payable Check 3,720.00
134641 09/09/2012 MID-STATE CONCRETE PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 2,251.98
134642 09/09/2012 MID-STATE SOLID WASTE & RECYCG Accounts Payable Check 390.78
134643 09/09/2012 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 670.78
134644 09/09/2012 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 193.77
134645 09/09/2012 ROBERT MOLLE Accounts Payable Check 179.00
134646 09/09/2012 N COUNTY WOMEN'S RESOURCE CTR Accounts Payable Check 11,000.00
134647 09/09/2012 NATL ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH SPORTS Accounts Payable Check 45.69
134648 09/09/2012 NATL MISSISSIPPI RIVER MUSUEM Accounts Payable Check 59.19
134649 09/09/2012 NORTH COUNTY GLASS Accounts Payable Check 90.35
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
134650 09/09/2012 NORTHERN ENERGY Accounts Payable Check 80.00
134651 09/09/2012 OFFICE DEPOT INC. Accounts Payable Check 427.48
134652 09/09/2012 TARA ORLICK Accounts Payable Check 22.76
134655 09/09/2012 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 48,348.35
134656 09/09/2012 PASO ROBLES FORD LINCOLN MERC Accounts Payable Check 28,260.38
134657 09/09/2012 PASO ROBLES FORD LINCOLN MERC Accounts Payable Check 528.96
134658 09/09/2012 PASO ROBLES SAFE& LOCK, INC. Accounts Payable Check 605.55
134659 09/09/2012 PC MALL Accounts Payable Check 1,187.26
134660 09/09/2012 SHERRY PERRY Accounts Payable Check 57.00
134661 09/09/2012 THE PETTING ZOO, INC. Accounts Payable Check 414.26
134662 09/09/2012 SCOTT E. PIPAN Accounts Payable Check 281.00
134663 09/09/2012 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,183.09
134664 09/09/2012 RACHELLE RICKARD Accounts Payable Check 300.00
134665 09/09/2012 ROCKWOOD GENERAL CONTRACTORS Accounts Payable Check 32,936.67
134666 09/09/2012 MICHELLE R. ROGERS Accounts Payable Check 588.00
134667 09/09/2012 ROTARY CLUB OF ATASCADERO Accounts Payable Check 500.00
134668 09/09/2012 SAFETY DRIVERS ED., LLC. Accounts Payable Check 102.90
134669 09/09/2012 SAN LUIS POWERHOUSE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 318.27
134670 09/09/2012 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY Accounts Payable Check 492.21
134671 09/09/2012 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN Accounts Payable Check 1,853.78
134672 09/09/2012 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO COMM. Accounts Payable Check 31,133.00
134673 09/09/2012 SUN BADGE COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 43.32
134674 09/09/2012 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL_ Accounts Payable Check 2,831.00
134675 09/09/2012 JOHN W.TAYLOR Accounts Payable Check 179.00
134676 09/09/2012 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS Accounts Payable Check 121.28
134677 09/09/2012 TESCO CONTROLS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 12,225.00
134678 09/09/2012 LESLIE R.THOMPSON Accounts Payable Check 36.60
134679 09/09/2012 RUSS THOMPSON Accounts Payable Check 300.00
134680 09/09/2012 STEVE TIROTTA Accounts Payable Check 129.29
134681 09/09/2012 TW TELECOM, INC. Accounts Payable Check 11.41
134682 09/09/2012 U.S. POSTMASTER Accounts Payable Check 50.00
134683 09/09/2012 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check 2,573.52
134684 09/09/2012 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 1,627.73
134685 09/09/2012 WEST COAST AUTO &TOWING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 520.16
134686 09/09/2012 KAREN B.WYKE Accounts Payable Check 489.00
1168 09/14/2012 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Payroll Vendor Payment 874.61
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
1169 09/14/2012 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEh Payroll Vendor Payment 44,315.25
1170 09/14/2012 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEP Payroll Vendor Payment 59,169.42
134687 09/14/2012 ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN, Payroll Vendor Payment 760.00
134688 09/14/2012 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 40.00
134689 09/14/2012 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS Payroll Vendor Payment 1,259.50
134690 09/14/2012 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT Accounts Payable Check 1,248.00
134691 09/14/2012 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC. Payroll Vendor Payment 2,706.87
134692 09/14/2012 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Payroll Vendor Payment 300.00
134693 09/14/2012 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 9,580.96
134694 09/14/2012 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment 1,433.04
134695 09/14/2012 SEIU LOCAL 620 Payroll Vendor Payment 763.84
134696 09/14/2012 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 Payroll Vendor Payment 311.61
134697 09/14/2012 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 Payroll Vendor Payment 2,281.20
134699 09/14/2012 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 28,484.00
134700 09/14/2012 CHEVRON &TEXACO BUS. CARD Accounts Payable Check 1,313.15
134701 09/14/2012 SHELL Accounts Payable Check 666.37
134702 09/14/2012 WRIGHT EXPRESS FSC-76 FLEET Accounts Payable Check 106.18
134703 09/14/2012 WRIGHT EXPRESS FSC-76 UNIVERSL Accounts Payable Check 15,009.52
1171 09/18/2012 RABOBANK, N.A. Payroll Vendor Payment 60,453.52
1172 09/18/2012 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 16,707.61
1173 09/18/2012 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1,273.48
134704 09/21/2012 29TONIGHT, CO. Accounts Payable Check 74.18
134705 09/21/2012 A&TARBORISTS &VEGETATION Accounts Payable Check 2,000.00
134706 09/21/2012 ACCESS PUBLISHING Accounts Payable Check 75.00
134707 09/21/2012 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 7,913.16
134708 09/21/2012 ALL SIGNS AND GRAPHICS, LLC Accounts Payable Check 53.63
134709 09/21/2012 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC. Accounts Payable Check 420.50
134710 09/21/2012 AMERICAN MARBORG Accounts Payable Check 65.00
134711 09/21/2012 AMERICAN WEST TIRE&AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 2,402.62
134712 09/21/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 185.51
134713 09/21/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 162.47
134714 09/21/2012 ATASCADERO HAY& FEED Accounts Payable Check 230.76
134715 09/21/2012 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 1,000.00
134716 09/21/2012 BASSETT'S CRICKET RANCH,INC. Accounts Payable Check 43.60
134717 09/21/2012 BELL'S PLUMBING REPAIR, INC. Accounts Payable Check 110.00
134718 09/21/2012 BERRY MAN, INC. Accounts Payable Check 339.40
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
134719 09/21/2012 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC Accounts Payable Check 2,394.20
134720 09/21/2012 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00
134721 09/2112012 BURKE,WILLIAMS, & SORENSON LLP Accounts Payable Check 23,052.88
134722 09/21/2012 CA CODE CHECK, INC. Accounts Payable Check 798.75
134723 09/21/2012 CA HIGHWAY PATROL Accounts Payable Check 300.00
134724 09/21/2012 CAL-COAST REFRIGERATION, INC Accounts Payable Check 440.70
134725 09/21/2012 CALPORTLAND COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 276.55
134726 09/21/2012 CENTRAL COAST R& R LOCK Accounts Payable Check 769.88
134727 09/21/2012 CENTRAL VALLEY COMMUNITY BANK Accounts Payable Check 2,805.30
134728 09/21/2012 CERTIFIED FOLDER DISPLAY SVC Accounts Payable Check 4,390.17
134729 09/21/2012 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 120.00
134730 09/21/2012 KAREN A. CLANIN Accounts Payable Check 24.50
134731 09/21/2012 TIMOTHY CLEAVER Accounts Payable Check 145.00
134732 09/21/2012 COAST ELECTRONICS Accounts Payable Check 3,701.30
134733 09/21/2012 COAST LINE DISTRIBUTING Accounts Payable Check 422.71
134734 09/21/2012 COASTAL COPY, LP Accounts Payable Check 136.32
134735 09/21/2012 COASTAL REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 267.46
134736 09/21/2012 COMPUCOM SYSTEMS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 21,430.09
134737 09/21/2012 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 371,26
134738 09/21/2012 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 132.10
134739 09/21/2012 CULLIGAN/CENTRAL COAST WTR TRT Accounts Payable Check 70.00
134740 09/21/2012 MATTHEW J. CURRY Accounts Payable Check 165.00
134741 09/21/2012 D4 ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 1,939.45
134742 09/21/2012 BRIAN S. DAVIN, JR. Accounts Payable Check 270.00
134743 09/21/2012 CALEB M. DAVIS Accounts Payable Check 562,00
134744 09/21/2012 SANDRA N. DEAL PH.D. Accounts Payable Check 270.00
134745 09/21/2012 DANIEL R. DUCLOS Accounts Payable Check 54.00
134746 09/21/2012 EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC Accounts Payable Check 18,908.50
134747 09/21/2012 EIKHOF DESIGN GROUP, INC. Accounts Payable Check 4,808.00
134748 09/21/2012 EL CAMINO CAR WASH LLC Accounts Payable Check 29.90
134749 09/21/2012 ESCUELA DEL RIO Accounts Payable Check 80.00
134750 09/21/2012 EWING IRRIGATION GOLF INDUSTRL Accounts Payable Check 690.62
134751 09/21/2012 EXECUTIVE INFORMATION SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 22,869.00
134752 09/21/2012 KEITH J. FALERIOS Accounts Payable Check 1,600.00
134753 09/21/2012 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 67.56
134754 09/21/2012 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 416.51
134755 09/21/2012 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL Accounts Payable Check 1,848.00
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
134756 09/21/2012 FILIPPONI &THOMPSON DRILLING Accounts Payable Check 50.00
134757 09/21/2012 FIRST TRANSIT, INC. Accounts Payable Check 38,286.61
134758 09/21/2012 FITNESS EDGE EXERCISE EQUIP. Accounts Payable Check 215.00
134759 09/21/2012 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 150.97
134760 09/21/2012 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 269.55
134761 09/21/2012 GOLDEN STATE STEEL Accounts Payable Check 25,247.70
134762 09/21/2012 GRAINGER Accounts Payable Check 349.81
134763 09/21/2012 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 2.90
134764 09/21/2012 GROUND UP DESIGN & CONST. MGMT Accounts Payable Check 807.50
134765 09/21/2012 GSA- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Accounts Payable Check 604.34
134766 09/21/2012 H.D. PETERSON Accounts Payable Check 301.60
134767 09/21/2012 EDDIE L. HARRIS Accounts Payable Check 54.00
134768 09/21/2012 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT& COPY Accounts Payable Check 78.55
134769 09/21/2012 HARVEY'S HONEYHUTS Accounts Payable Check 746.51
134770 09/21/2012 VALERIE HUMPHREY Accounts Payable Check 52.00
134771 09/21/2012 CAROL D. JANSSEN Accounts Payable Check 41.25
134772 09/21/2012 JIFFY LUBE Accounts Payable Check 34.44
134773 09/21/2012 K& M INTERNATIONAL Accounts Payable Check 244.40
134774 09/21/2012 KANEY Accounts Payable Check 358.85
134775 09/21/2012 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO. INC Accounts Payable Check 2,856.27
134776 09/21/2012 LEHIGH HANSON Accounts Payable Check 321.93
134777 09/21/2012 MADRONE LANDSCAPES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 19,460.93
134778 09/21/2012 MAINLINE UTILITY CO. Accounts Payable Check 525,00
134779 09/21/2012 MEDWORKS MEDICAL CENTER Accounts Payable Check 95.00
134780 09/21/2012 METROPOLITAN PARK DISTRICT OF Accounts Payable Check 120.00
134781 09/21/2012 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW, INC. Accounts Payable Check 75.40
134782 09/21/2012 MID-STATE SOLID WASTE& RECYCG Accounts Payable Check 1,223.67
134783 09/21/2012 MILLENNIUM CONSULTING ASSC. Accounts Payable Check 1,986.55
134784 09/21/2012 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 749.07
134785 09/21/2012 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT Accounts Payable Check 2,273.79
134786 09/21/2012 MISSION COMMUNITY BANK Accounts Payable Check 15,693.08
134787 09/21/2012 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 327.12
134788 09/21/2012 MOSS, LEVY, & HARTZHEIM LLP Accounts Payable Check 1,000.00
134789 09/21/2012 NORTH COUNTY GLASS Accounts Payable Check 96.14
134790 09/21/2012 NOWDOCS INTERNATIONAL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 330.85
134791 09/21/2012 OFFICE DEPOT INC. Accounts Payable Check 701.08
134792 09/21/2012 DAWN PATTERSON Accounts Payable Check 52.00
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
134793 09/21/2012 PAVEMENT ENGINEERING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 9,150.00
134794 09/21/2012 PC MALL GOV Accounts Payable Check 134.06
134795 09/21/2012 PERRY'S PARCEL&COURIER SVC Accounts Payable Check 294.90
134796 09/21/2012 PFEIFFER PARTNERS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 31,727.47
134797 09/21/2012 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLYJNC. Accounts Payable Check 432.80
134798 09/21/2012 RAMINHA CONSTRUCTION, INC. Accounts Payable Check 19,886.98
134799 09/21/2012 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 69.71
134800 09/21/2012 SANTA LUCIA SPORTSMEN ASSC INC Accounts Payable Check 179.20
134801 09/21/2012 SANTA MARGARITA CONST. CORP. Accounts Payable Check 141,237.74
134802 09/21/2012 SCOTT OBRIEN FIRE&SAFETY CO Accounts Payable Check 524.09
134803 09/21/2012 SIGN CRAFT Accounts Payable Check 75.00
134804 09/21/2012 SLO CO HEALTH AGENCY Accounts Payable Check 1,383.00
134805 09/21/2012 SMITHSONIAN NATL ZOOLOGICAL PK Accounts Payable Check 242.42
134806 09/21/2012 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY Accounts Payable Check 363.99
134807 09/21/2012 STRIKER MEDIA GROUP, INC. Accounts Payable Check 875.00
134808 09/21/2012 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 753.00
134809 09/21/2012 TRIBUNE Accounts Payable Check 186,00
134810 09/21/2012 TURF STAR, INC. Accounts Payable Check 61.47
134811 09/21/2012 TY, INC. Accounts Payable Check 97.20
134815 09/21/2012 U.S. BANK Accounts Payable Check 21,898.37
134816 09/21/2012 ULTREX BUSINESS PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 284.01
134817 09/21/2012 UNITED STAFFING ASSOCIATES,LLC Accounts Payable Check 3,375.90
134818 09/21/2012 UNIVAR USA, INC. Accounts Payable Check 4,519.52
134819 09/21/2012 US FOODS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 647.92
134820 09/21/2012 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check 5,536.60
134821 09/21/2012 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 274.79
134822 09/21/2012 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 187.59
134823 09/21/2012 WILKINS ACTION GRAPHICS Accounts Payable Check 272.64
134824 09/21/2012 WILLIAMS FLOORING AMERICA, INC Accounts Payable Check 1,280.00
134825 09/25/2012 FEDERAL EXPRESS Accounts Payable Check 345.42
1174 09/26/2012 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON Accounts Payable Check 382,251.61
1175 09/28/2012 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Payroll Vendor Payment 874.61
1176 09/28/2012 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTE9 Payroll Vendor Payment 43,059.51
1177 09/28/2012 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM Accounts Payable Check 58,453.17
134826 09/28/2012 ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN. Payroll Vendor Payment 760.00
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listin
For the Month of September 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
134827 09/28/2012 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 40.00
134828 09/28/2012 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS Payroll Vendor Payment 1,259.50
134829 09/28/2012 AXA EQUITABLE Payroll Vendor Payment 520.12
134830 09/28/2012 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC. Payroll Vendor Payment 2,706.87
134831 09/28/2012 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC. Payroll Vendor Payment 165.00
134832 09/28/2012 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Payroll Vendor Payment 300.00
134833 09/28/2012 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 9,330.96
134834 09/28/2012 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment 698.60
134835 09/28/2012 SEIU LOCAL 620 Payroll Vendor Payment 731.11
134836 09/28/2012 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 Payroll Vendor Payment 311.61
134837 09/28/2012 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 Payroll Vendor Payment 2,506.20
134838 09/28/2012 PICKARD & BUTTERS CONST., INC. Accounts Payable Check 86,284.57
$ 2,481,517.93
ITEM NUMBER: A - 3
DATE: 1/113/12
f
Atascad r ity Council September 201
Staff Report - City Treasurer
September 2012 Investment Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Council receive and file the City Treasurer's report for quarter ending September 2012,
REPORT IN BRIEF:
Cash and investments
Checking $ 782,309
Zoo Credit Card Deposit Account 7,507
Money Market Accounts 385
Certificates of Deposit 11,001,000
Government Securities 11,027,667
LAI F 22,570,106
Cash with Fiscal Agents 1,787,204
Cash in Banks at September 30, 2012 $ 47,176,178
Deposits in Transit -
Outstanding Checks (674,242)
Cash and Investments at September 30, 2012 $ 46,501,936
Investment Activity
Securities Purchased:
Purchase Date Description Type Cost Maturity Date
07/24/12 Federal Home Loan Bank gov't security $ 507,200 06/09/17
07/24/12 Federal Home Loan Bank gov't security 507,461 06/19/17
08/29/12 Federal Home Loan gov't security 506,280 07/28/17
Mortgage Corp
09/27/12 Federal Home Loan Bank gov't security 500,250 09/08/17
09/27/12 Federal Farm Credit Bank gov't security 502,445 09/21/17
Page 1 of 12
Investment Activity (continued)
Securities Matured:
Maturity Date Description Type Original Cost Amount Matured
07/09/12 GE Money Bank CD $ 150,000 $ 150,000
07/16/12 American Express CD 150,000 150,000
Centurion Bank
07/17/12 First Business Bank CD 250,000 250,000
07/24/12 EagleBank CD 250,000 250,000
08/27/12 Lake Forest Bank & Trust CD 250,000 250,000
08/27/12 North Shore Community CD 250,000 250,000
Bank
08/31/12 Enterprise National Bank CD 95,000 95,000
Securities Sold/Called Prior to Maturity:
None _
Other Reportable Activities:
None
Page 2 of 12
CITY OF ATASCADERO
TREASURER'S REPORT
CASH&INVESTMENTS A CTIVITY SUMMAR Y
for the quarter ending September 30, 2012
CHECKING FISCAL
ACCOUNTS INVESTMENTS .AGENT TOTALS
Balance per Banks at
July 1, 2012 $ 294,314 $ 53,122,266 $ 1,417,647 54,834,227
Receipts 3,638,062 28,256 369,557 4,035,875
Disbursements (11,693,924) - (11,693,924)
Transfers In 13,045,000 4,493,636 - 17,538,636
Transfers Out (4,493,636) (13,045,000) - (17,538,636)
Balance per Banks at
September 30,2012 789,816 * $ 44,599,158 $ 1,787,204 47,176,178
Deposits in Transit
Outstanding Checks (674,242)
Adjusted Treasurer's Balance $ 46,501,936
* This balance includes the balance of the Zoo Credit Card Deposit Account, which is the account
established to receive the point of sale credit card transactions from the Zoo Gift Shop, and to disburse
fees charged by the credit card processing service.
Page 3 of 12
'n .•+
g M N 'h .h-� M W 10 10 of M
W N h V M! N '/1 fT h N O O cY O
Q Vl C1 M G1 G
69
P M
M 00 h if1 N '/1 h N O O Pke, O
� f\FhOO•� g O
O N(N
N
fig
O_ 00 S O pO S S S O S S S O O S O
M O O O O O O O O C O C S C O
O C O Ci C vl v; vi vl O ai viO O C; cs v
n eq c c c a O v rq o o <r
� V1 N N N N N N N N
C W N
U 2
R �
C
0. q
V
O 000 OO S S S O O S O O S O S S
M O O O O O C O pO O O O C CL O
v. O V Vim' O S O 7
V � h v01 h C4 N N N C N N
(cn N N N N N
69
e o 0 o e e 22
O vs °v\t h
MN O V' N --
QO C fV N fV N C4 N
� Lt1N
e e
In /1
a
e ,2 r• h N N ' 'fl �O .�.. O O G h N q v
.p F N C [I' N M N h S
N N N N N N ni N N <
OC-I�C tn\ a
U ti
tz
'� N N :tl RS td W cd (tl �6 RS cC N F c3 - RS
o _
c c a c c °o n a
<c wc o o� wO wo wC wo w0 0 o� w 1-0
w
C O 0 0
v
F
U u u v
g Q o o g o o
CL
0.
C
M
E< E� f�L� i� �w eK] iat x m0
q eGid o z o c o F-
0
°�
tl1 V
.Y
is a x .oL'
c 7 °C `u `S, i 3 ✓ c
V u 7 '
4L� u5 9z0 ax aL°° w��
b
pp � � OR
L4
Q H a IT h �D N N -,r f .-� 00 OD M
pv o ry kA o
N N N M N
�v
00 w en
N V MIn
N N 00 n n
�O �A N t� oo
O V d'
N N N N .-. � N N N A A N N N N N N
vi
b O O O C O O O C O po po O O O
' O O C O C O O O O O O p O 6 O O O
O
O O Q O O
GL Vi Vi '/i V7 h C O h h vi v1 O
h � -- N N N N ^" N N N N N N N N N
C
[� � ro ro ro ro ro m ro m m ro �a y o w w
c
�C
0.q
g S 0 0 o C g o o o
1 v v v v o o v "rr v v v v a a v
y N N N N N N N N
N N N N N
�a
oG 8 ` h o
r o ao vl
4" ti c c h G to v o f oD
eq
QQ10 oa � c � � � c �U
C� y^
m a ro a ro m m 'all
a m a a m m o ro
y 4 a a a a a a a a
F R R F ^ 6 Q C C C R ya Q
o c c o o c o o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0
w w w G w w w mow- w w w
u 16
U v u u
00 O O O O 00 00
wTy' fr t� O. v1 h O O O N l3 t� 1� O N T
V N N O O C`ytcC`Cn M Cl) O R O O �Qp �Tp O "I
0.
a,
c
a
iD4 x eLIS m
R
Vy o e CO a� v ° u o w w ro vi¢, ag
aL
a s d c y 1• c > °u x c w1 c v ? d $ 7 c V
�c �.w cw � o � „ oo c We
mu
W ^ M M tt1 M M M_ M m y M_ M w
V M
!Z
� Y1 O O Q M C�
Q C O fel ery+5 t^. M q G 6 C O N
10 �1 !V Cd Vi
O O C O O O O O O G O O �-+ o
Q i% 41 O n a �2 an i O yep} M
w oo
TO b O 01 i% �O c O
ti n v 01 a� 01 0+ d oe 1 vi vi 10 16 N 7
V _
In N
r\
h o n n 0 M 1n v1 ',Cy' 1n 1n m c1 M
M V M N v� m n n o m m
I4 GV M O llt� n ' M OM M O l 1fl O
On Q M Q O+ 10
lC 1U V) Y1 vn M 01 n vl V1 v1 61 kA
N 1n O N N N O In v) N N N N
ffi
,ti O O O O O O O O O O C O O O O
O O O O 1C n M 00 G G C O O O C
d 00 P q O N M M LO C� O O O O O O
o0 N v; v1 vi V n vi v1 h O
n n v v v
ONx oo rn v v cr aa, v)
N N N
oo
N
d 0 0 o ro m R q r. a cs
Pn0 n v' v M Ny'
G O O O OG O o O O O O O O
0 0 o O O c 0 o O c o G C
c g o 0 0 o c c o 0 0 0 0 0
p C vt v1 �n C O O G d N vi v1 to n O
O G G1 V V `7 C1
N N N N
a
b9
Q OO O e e O O e e e O O e e e
'J 00 in q v1 v1 v1 00 N O O O O O U'1
W o0 N N M n 1CO O O O O O N N
v N N N - - N N N N N N N N N
W N e e e e e e e e e e e e o
a ti $0 80 o1n n Ln o o q o 0 0 0 0 $ In v
W N NI 7 r- VZ V) ut O O O O N N --
+r Er V N N cV tV ..r N N CV N N N r4
fid a\� F
0
d
C o C C C
Go cl) Q
O O OC O O O O A
E E w- 4 E E E F s 4
o > C "'ED
0 u v 0 v rl) v v v rl) u
w1"� v� 01 0o O C 01 M M 7 � o�NN oN0 01 v1 i� c�
ai A N Z� M r, N Y i yip Q L� 1�Cpp
p O O O O O O O O O O
A
u �
G
O r
F
c r .Sc t c p
p
Ghy` EM E uN Ermi `2� oz Y < Rz F4
F "' ?G
d O
E c _ yr G sn G n GG T _ a a' c c 1i r n G.
C..0 4-
1D Vi Z� n W 35 Ci v'i i:� N
c A o 0 0 0 0 0 o c o o o
a v C oC O 00 n h N N O M 10 n o0
7 V 7 C' M v1 'n 7 C C- V
10 �D ami
m r n o+ 00 00 0o v M t� oo � N N m m r m 10 M � v w v � v v
p�a N � N (A N N v� 7 V
yp.V N N � N N N � N N h N h N N
!i
Fn O CCJJ O `CS [eeV{� .p
N
N F N N N N
0
N 7 m m
N
a. a
O O O 6 C O O O O O O O O O O
`Y � V � '�V p h Cft h O V1 V1 O Vi O Vi N1
O
C„V N N N N � N N hl h N N v1 N Crl N N
�t Q
cem
O I+. W � �• � � o g g o o � M o o
N
rnIn
E� h
Bi
a
oG pp C i Q 6 G C a
o 0 o o o c o
A o O O D N O N p O O
4
to
O G O
F
4y1 v Y m .r CA X00 vti7 0
i
S
� ,>,,,� c•_ � rt ,� o y t„u a: >,en as A y
o f G � y E °'m O � � d Irn• �vt� m y "'' � v� � E w� b E 8
f
oz u s °
QV f�v� GO¢ Cax ft.0 r/iC.. ? 7 Gi.U Sz+U 0..1 fix G:.0 Ci3 zV
rre O �t c' -+ N `
N
C, 0 ^ c s
0
A .mss o v1 p v $ 6 v 9vNN1
W O h 10R Le) <4 M 00 O O
� M M
O 1/1 ,,upps 1/1 O �A Ln O 1A M It �t l-
E.i r- N 00 oo0 n ON, �V�p1 ON, 0pp0 OR N O 90
O P O vp. W oho
V1 Le) v) V1 �/'� V7 Ln V1 K In O'er h h b
Ir
O O 1/1 O O O O Y1 op V N
n � N N N V �p Do N V im"
0 O O ^ ^ O O O O O ON W Oho Gq
1n kj)c> v1 vi v1 c> 1n v> 1n v1 t o oo C},
U
H1 v) N e
N A
O Cl O O v1 h �y R h N i
lo
a 0C t, n 'lo N N N O
ss s
pp pp pp O O O O O O P O p An
O T+
O O O S O O O O O
itj O O C O Ci O O O O to n h fry
W p O O O O O O O O O dt 0o oo M S
v u E
Grl
rG rn n oo °h° Irl ph n n n
e \ e ae a e
> ao
Z
W
ti
tot Q Q Q ¢ Q Q Q Q Q Q f
~ V
� iCi d
Q
y�y 01
H �
W cn rn n s n vs w c p y
�
Z w `> appp u w o3 ww� v t U
3 �
OO+ h h F ,EG
a O O O O O O .Q"o. O Go,
C' Q
y O
O -
a a a
`d r_ 6
c O c o
u U U U x y a y v
.e c oc a c' a
-� rMi I fG 'i3. Sxn aCl 'y y W r, Z V
F Y ec o eT^ c! car c o cv ch oo cNE x
oo m + 6 w N a C `o O v
�- m0 I< �� �� c, �Q SO
U� ur- Q u Cih wh d W uoo
�" M M EM E EcM+ EM EM 8M Em °' h o o •y y c"a
o a o 0 0 o e F u
Q pxLpO m CCS .. CC `.App WW�ppp a 3� ors
g ti� a
F+" 2 a L e, e� L� L� L q S+q � '�•• r+ 'd Y'F� �\
Q Gr �+rn v v2 C&n u h d v: d
frw V ix.U fa+V w U :;l V c R1 w p m � � . ':.•..
e C
G y
C
Q ^ [NfO
O O O O O O O Cl C k
�L Q 6 U = F
City of Ataseadero
Investments by Type
September 2012
Government Securities Cash with
241'/4 Fiscal Agent
4%
Certificates
of Deposit 4 8
24%
Investment September 2012
L,AIF $ 22,570,106
Certificates of Deposit 11,001,000
Government Securities 1.1.,027,667
Cash with Fiscal Agent 1,787,204
Other 385
$ 46,386,362
Page 9 of 12
City of Ataseadero
Investments by Maturity
September 2012
One to Five Years
38%
One Month
to One Year
0
I 0/o
Within
One Month
2%
On Demand
50%
Investment September 2012
On Demand $ 22,570,491
Within One Month 795,000
One Month to One Year 4,379,000
One to Five Years 16,854,667
$ 44,599,158
* Cash with.fiscal agent is not included in the totals for this graph because the amounts are restricted based on
bond covenants,and therefore,the City doesn't not retain the option to liquefy these funds at will.
Page 10 of 12
City of Atascadero
Investments by Custodial Agent
September 2012
Bank of
Union Bank „.,�'�,��Mi
47%
State of California
49%
Custodial Agent September 2012
State of California $ 22,570,106
Union Bank 22,024,052
Bank of New York 1,787,204
Other -
$ 46,386,362
Page 1.1 of 12
City of Ataseadero
Investment Yield vs. 2--Year Treasury Yield
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2012
1.60%
f 1.40% - F -
1.20%
I
1.00°i° 'W_._. _._..._.__........__......_�, ___...._. _�.�_. .___
07
-
0.80% -----..----- — —' ...------ - ---=- -
0.60/0
i
i� 0.40°!° -. _ _ ____._ ____. :77
0.20%
Ew.
t 0.00%
��*� �'�� ��� ��� ��~ o�� ��� Q^� �^rl'
IV " ti ti ti ti ti N ti
�c a�°r
�c City Yield 2-Yr Treasury Weighted Portfolio Yield i
2-Yr
Treasury
Weighted
Portfolio
City Yield Yield
September 2010 1.42% 0.77%
December 2010 1.31% 0.77%
March 2010 1.10% 0.82%
June 2011 1.11% 0.58%
September 2011 1.08% 0.44%
December 2011 1.08% 0.45%
March 2012 1.02% 0.48%
June 2012 0.95% 0.43%
September 2012 1,01% 0.41%
Page 12 of 12
ITEM NUMBER: A- 4
DATE: 11-13-12
isis IT 1979
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — Administrative Services Department
Library Impact Fees Distribution for New Library
RECOMMENDATION:
Council authorize the Director of Administrative Services to appropriate $20,430 to be
remitted to the San Luis Obispo County Library to be used towards construction of
tenant improvements in the new Atascadero Library Facility.
DISCUSSION:
Because the City's residents and businesses have an interest in maintaining library
service levels, the Council established a Library Facilities Impact Fee that is charged on
all new development. These fees have being accumulating in the Library Expansion
Facilities Fees Fund, to be used for the expansion of the library facility space and the
library collection.
In December 2010, the County purchased a new library facility at 6555 Capistrano
Avenue, rather than expand the existing library. The purchase, construction and
furnishing of the new library facility has a total project cost of approximately $5,719,820.
The County's policy with regard to any large library project requires that half of the
project funding must come from the community. The Friends of the Atascadero Library
(Friends) have been that community connection, actively raising funds for the new
library project. In order for tenant improvements to begin, Friends have been given a
deadline of December 2012 to finish raising the remaining $130,000 for the full local
share.
In December 2010, the City contributed $254,750, a combination of impact fees and
other funds that had been set aside for library expansion, toward the acquisition of the
new facility. Since that time $20,430 in funds has accumulated in the library expansion
fund. Since all City contributions are applied toward the amount that must be raised by
Friends, it has been requested that the City release all available Library Expansion
Funds in order to help meet the Friends' deadline.
ITEM NUMBER: A- 4
DATE: 11-13-12
Staff has received a letter from Brian Reynolds, Director of the San Luis Obispo County
Library, requesting that the current funds in the Library Expansion Facilities Fees Fund
be sent to the County Library, to help the Friends meet their half of the new library's net
project cost. In compliance with the use of Library Expansion Funds, these funds will be
used for tenant improvements.
ALTERNATIVES:
The City Council may decide not to authorize payment of this contribution to the new
library.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact will be a $20,430 expenditure of Library Impact Fees funds. These
funds have been earmarked for Library expansion and will not impact City operations.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
ITEM NUMBER: A- 5
DATE: 11-13-12
sATAsr—-----
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — Public Works Department
Lift Station #2 Engineering Design Contract Award
(Contract for Professional Services)
RECOMMENDATION:
Council authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with Penfield and Smith,
Incorporated for the design of Lift Station #2 improvements for an amount not to exceed
$44,700.
DISCUSSION:
Background: Lift Station #2 is a pre-existing sewage pumping station located in front of
the Atascadero State Hospital at 10333 EI Camino Real. The existing sewage pumping
station was installed in 1986, to provide sewer services to South Atascadero. Recently,
staff has noted significant changes in influent flow and adverse structural conditions due
to original design shortcomings at this wastewater facility. The most significant
shortcoming is "dead zones." Dead zones form in the corners of the concrete wet well
because of the wet well's rectangular shape. These dead zones allow solids to
accumulate, which results in the discharge of hydrogen sulfide gas throughout the
wetwell. The hydrogen sulfide gas has led to the complete failure of Lift Station #2's
wetwell coating which protects the concrete structure from corrosion. The loss of the
coating means the structural concrete is now being affected. Lift station #2's wet well is
located under the sidewalk and northbound slow lane of EI Camino Real. so loss of
structural integrity is a problem that needs to be addressed.
Earth Systems Pacific was retained by the City to provide an evaluation of Lift Station
#2's wet well structural integrity in May, 2012. Earth Systems Pacific's evaluation report
confirmed the sewage pumping station's wet well coating has failed throughout the
structure; and, as a result, the concrete wet well, piping, and lids have undergone
significant corrosion. Therefore, staff is moving forward with the redesign of Lift Station
2 because of the changed flow characteristics and the associated corrosive activity.
The City Council allocated funds in fiscal year 2012/2013 for the redesigning of Lift
Station #2. The redesigning of Lift Station #2 will aid in overcoming the aforementioned
original design shortcomings by evaluating current and future flow needs, sewage pump
ITEM NUMBER: A- 5
DATE: 11-13-12
horse power, wet well shape and inefficiencies, nuisance odor control options, and
safety measures. Furthermore, the design improvements at this site will aid in
minimizing sanitary sewer overflows to the nearby riparian area. Lastly, an engineer's
estimate will be provided to staff by the design consultant for budgeting construction
costs in fiscal years 2013-2015.
Analysis: City staff solicited proposals for Lift Station #2 Engineering Design Services.
The Request for Proposals were due on September 20, 2012. Three proposals from
engineering firms were received. The proposals were reviewed for accuracy and
compliance with the proposal requirements and ranked based on graded criteria.
Penfield and Smith received the highest ranking of the three proposers. Staff has
negotiated the price and services needed for this project with Penfield and Smith. The
fee for the design services to be provided by Penfield and Smith is $44,700.00.
Conclusion: Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to
execute a contract with Penfield and Smith in the amount of $44,700.00, for the design
of Lift Station #2.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Lift Station #2 re-design contract is funded by wastewater funds that were
appropriated within the 2011-2013 City budget.
FUNDING USES
Design $ 44,700
Contingency(12%) 5,300
Total Estimated Cost $ 50,000
FUNDING SOURCES
Lift Station No. 2 Design
Wastewater Reserve Funds 50,000
Total Funding Sources $ 50,000
PROJECTED FUNDING SHORTFALL $
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Reject staff's recommendation and direct staff to reconsider the design firm choice.
ATTACHMENT:
None.
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11-13-12
1978 r�
A tascadero City Council
Staff Report — Public Works Department
Special Interchange Mitigation Fee Update
(Santa Barbara Rd at Hwy 101 Interchange, Viejo Camino at EI Camino
Real, and San Diego Way at EI Camino Real)
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Council:
1. Receive this report on the Santa Barbara Road at Highway 101, Viejo Camino at
EI Camino Real, and San Diego Way at EI Camino Real special transportation
mitigation fees collected from the Dove Creek and Las Lomas Developments;
and,
2. Approve Draft Resolution A approving continued collection of special fair share
traffic mitigation fees for the Dove Creek and Las Lomas developments to allow
for the future installation of alternative US 101/Santa Barbara Road interchange
improvements, and signalized intersections at Viejo Camino at EI Camino Real
and San Diego Road and EI Camino Real.
DISCUSSION:
Background: During the tentative map stages of the Las Lomas (Woodlands) and
Dove Creek developments, there were separate mitigated negative declarations
prepared for each project which included traffic analysis reports with traffic mitigation
measures for all of the projects. In the mitigated negative declarations, there were
mitigation measures that included traffic improvements at the Santa Barbara Road/US
101 Interchange, Viejo Camino at EI Camino Real, and San Diego Way at EI Camino
Real.
Based on the traffic studies, the City Engineer determined that special development
impact fees, in addition to the City's standard TIF fees, were required to fully mitigate
traffic impacts from the projects. The City Council included these specific development
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11-13-12
impact fees as mitigation measures in its adoption of the projects' mitigated negative
declaration and related conditions of approval for both maps.
The City Council has also adopted Capital Improvement Plans which have included the
proposed improvements to the Santa Barbara Road/101 Interchange, Viejo Camino at
EI Camino Real, and San Diego Way at EI Camino Real intersections.
Government Code Section 66001 (d)(1)(A) to (D) requires:
(d) (1) For the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into the account or fund, and
every five years thereafter, the local agency shall make all of the following findings with
respect to that portion of the account or fund remaining unexpended, whether committed
or uncommitted:
(a) Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put.
(b) Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for
which it is charged.
(c) Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing
in incomplete improvements identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a).
(d) Designate the approximate dates on which the funding referred to in
subparagraph (c) is expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.
The date of the first deposit of the fees was on October 15, 2007. To date the City has
collected:
Santa Barbara Rd — Highway 101 Interchange: $413,701.26
Viejo Camino at EI Camino Real: $ 44,332.40
San Diego Way at EI Camino Real: $ 57,112.53
Total Collected Special Mitigation Fees: $515,146.19
The City Staff has been periodically performing planning level reviews, traffic counts
and general observation of the interchange and intersections since that time. The
Santa Barbara Road interchange is currently being surveyed to facilitate further
preliminary planning and design work.
The interchange and intersection projects are important to the community in
Atascadero. The special traffic mitigation funds collected are for a specific mitigation
purpose and the City still intends to apply those funds to those improvements. City staff
has been actively planning for the interchange improvements and there are new
contracts for additional study. The interchange improvements will be needed once the
Las Lomas Specific Plan (Woodlands), and Dove Creek projects are completed. The
special impact fees are structured to be paid as units are completed. Since the housing
projects are only partially complete due to the recession and bankruptcies, the City has
not collected the necessary funds for the improvements.
Conclusion: Staff recommends that the City Council continue to collect the special
transportation mitigation fee for the planning, design and eventual construction of a
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11-13-12
modern roundabout at the northbound on-ramp of Highway 101 at Santa Barbara Road,
and signalized intersections at the other two locations. Traffic continues to increase at
the project sites as development occurs, and the conclusions of the traffic studies and
environmental impact reports are still valid.
The City continues to progress towards the installation of the projects and needs to
acquire sufficient funds to eventually install the facilities. The fees to be collected will
pay for a portion of the projects. Along with similar special traffic impact fees to be
determined for the Eagle Ranch project, the City's standard TIF fee funds collected by
all development within the City as outlined in the Master Facilities Plan are expected to
fund the balance of the projects.
It is anticipated improvements to the interchange and intersections will occur sometime
after June 30, 2018. This will be contingent on the progress of the Eagle Ranch
development, and build-out of projects at the south end of the City.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENT:
1. Draft Resolution A
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11-13-12
Attachment
Attachment: Draft Resolution A-Approval of Continued Collection of Special Fair Share
Traffic Impact Fees
Dove Creek Area Specific Plan (TTM 2003-0033)
Las Lomas (Woodlands) Specific Plan Area (TTM 2003-0027)
DRAFT RESOLUTION A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING CONINUED COLLECTION OF SPECIAL FAIR SHARE
TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEES
DOVE CREEK AREA SPECIFIC PLAN
LAS LOMAS (WOODLANDS) SPECIFIC PLAN AREA
WHEREAS,pursuant to Government Code Sections 66000 through 66008:
The City of Atascadero approved special fair share traffic mitigation fees for two projects
based on common traffic analysis reports and concurrent environmental determinations and
mitigation measure development("Projects"), namely;
(1) Dove Creek Development, pursuant to Conditional Use Permit 2003-0099, and
Tentative Tract Map 2003-0033; and ,
(2) Las Lomas Development (formerly Woodlands), pursuant to Specific Plan 2003-
0001, and Tentative Tract Map 2003-0027; and,
WHEREAS, the approval of the projects was based on detailed traffic analyses of the
projects impacts on City streets and interchanges, and required mitigation measures to minimize
environmental impacts, maximize community compatibility (General Plan Table II-5), and to
promote orderly and harmonious development; and,
WHEREAS, the determination of the special fair share traffic mitigation fee was made
by the City Council and approved by the original developers of the projects; and,
WHEREAS, since the time of the approved environmental determination and tentative
maps the projects have been partially developed and have paid the required mitigation fees as
building permits have been applied for and issued; and,
WHEREAS, the fees and mitigation measures were originally made in accordance with
laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11-13-12
Attachment
set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act(CEQA); and,
WHEREAS, traffic has continued to increase at the Santa Barbara Road and Highway
101 interchange, Viejo Camino and El Camino Real intersection, and the San Diego Road and El
Camino Real intersection; and,
WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject of by the
City Council of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was
admitted on behalf of said fees; and,
WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Council, at a Public Hearing held on November 13,
2012, studied and considered continued collection of Special Fair Share Traffic Mitigation Fees
for the Dove Creek and Las Lomas projects, and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Atascadero City Council makes the
following findings, determinations and recommendations with respect to the continued collection
of Special Fair Share Traffic Mitigation Fees:
SECTION 1. Findings for approval of continued collection of Special Fair Share
Traffic Mitigation Fees:
The Atascadero City Council finds as follows:
The proposed continued collection of Special Traffic Mitigation Fees is consistent with the
following findings pursuant to Government Code Section 6600 1(d)(1)(A)to (D):
1. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66001(d)(1)(A), the Council finds that the
purpose to which the fee is to be put is to fully mitigate the traffic impacts related to the
development of the projects on the following intersections and/or interchanges:
a. Modern roundabout at the northbound on-ramp at the Santa Barbara Road and
Highway 101 interchange; and,
b. Traffic signal installation and related improvements at the intersection of
Viejo Camino and El Camino Real; and,
c. Traffic signal installation and related improvements at the intersection of San
Diego Road and El Camino Real; and,
2. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66001(d)(1)(B), there is a reasonable
relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it charged based upon the
improvements specified in the project traffic impact studies and the corresponding engineer's
estimates of design and construction costs for the proposed traffic mitigations as specified in
the mitigated negative declarations for each project, and,
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11-13-12
Attachment
3. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66001(d)(1)(C), the sources and amounts
of funding anticipated to complete financing in incomplete improvements identified are:
a. Santa Barbara Road Northbound On-ramp Roundabout = $1,395,000
(Dove Creek 34.0%, Las Lomas 21.6%)
b. Viejo Camino at El Camino Real Intersection = $ 166,148
(Dove Creek 33.4%, Las Lomas 18.4%)
c. San Diego Road at El Camino Real Intersection = $ 227,475
(Dove Creek 31.4%)
4. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66001(d)(1)(D), the approximate date on
which the funding referred to in Finding No. 3 above is expected to be deposited into the
appropriate account or fund is within ten years (November 2022) to complete the necessary
improvements to the project sites; and,
5. The fees proposed represent the fair share of the required traffic mitigation for the
two developments, and the City continues to collect the balance of the other required funds
through its Development Impact Fees from all development within the City in order to pay
the City's share of this and other projects; and,
6. A duly noticed public hearing has been held to receive and consider public
testimony regarding the proposed continued collection of Special Fair Share Traffic
Mitigation Fees; and,
7. The proposed fees are in the public interest and protect the health, safety and
welfare of public by ensuring the orderly development of the City.
8. The proposed fees are in conformance with the adopted General Plan Goals,
Policies, and Programs and the overall intent of the General Plan.
As described below, the proposed fees are in conformance with the environmental
determinations for the Projects, mitigation measures, and the adopted General Plan Goals,
Policies and Programs and the overall intent of the General Plan.
SECTION 2. Approval. The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session assembled
on November 13, 2012 approved the continued collection of Fair Share Traffic Mitigation Fees
consistent with the following:
1. Dove Creek Development, Tentative Tract Map 2003-0033
2. Las Lomas Development(formerly Woodlands), Tentative Tract Map 2003-0027
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11-13-12
Attachment
On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member
the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO
By:
Bob Kelley, Mayor
ATTEST:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 11-13-12
1978 r�
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — Public Works Department
Atascadero Road Program Update
RECOMMENDATION:
Council receive and file this report on the Atascadero Road Program.
REPORT-IN-BRIEF:
The City is currently implementing the 2011-2013 portion of the Capital Improvement
Program where the Council budgeted a $2.6 million dollar investment in City streets.
Completion of Streetscape 3, Atascadero Avenue Cold In-Place Recycling (CIR), and
the San Fernando Road Overlay are examples of projects recently completed. Funding
has consistently been a challenge to adequately maintain City roads due to the many
miles of roads relative to our population, available funding, and the unique topography
and soil conditions on the west side of town.
The Atascadero Road Program was developed to focus the City's efforts in maintaining
and protecting the roads of Atascadero in an organized, efficient and cost-effective
manner. Over the last ten years the City has made good progress in improving the
overall condition of our roads.
This report will explain the issues in more detail, give an update on the progress we
have made to date, and outline planned road maintenance in the near future.
DISCUSSION:
Background: Atascadero has 138 miles of city-maintained roads and 29 miles of non-
City-maintained roads. This is the most road miles per capita of any city in the County.
Atascadero's rural nature, relatively low population and high road miles typically
translate to low funding levels, since many road maintenance funds (i.e. Gas Tax
revenue) are derived from population statistics.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 11-13-12
Since 2005 the City has made an $11.6-million dollar investment in City streets. This
funding has been focused primarily on Downtown projects and rehabilitation projects on
arterial and collector roads, as roads with the highest daily traffic volumes and worst
pavement condition receive priority. There are three general types of roads that the City
maintains:
1. Arterial - Largest and highest capacity roads in town, typically two lanes in
each direction with a median or center turn lane, bike lanes and on-street
parking.
2. Collector — Roads designed to collect traffic from local streets and move it
to arterial streets, typically one or two lanes in each direction, some with
bike lanes and on-street parking.
3. Local — Neighborhood roads and cul-de-sacs typically providing access for
subdivisions, minimal widths.
Recent local road projects have included projects such as the Old Morro Road
Landslide Repair and the overlay of EI Verano Avenue. These projects were funded
based on eliminating failed pavement, and related safety issues.
Since the inception of the Atascadero Road Program, the City has paved 18 miles of
Circulation Plan roads and eight miles of local roads through the various funding
programs. Recent Atascadero Road Program successes have included the following
road projects:
Collector and Arterial Roads
1. EI Camino Real Resurfacing (Streetscape 2) — Hwy 41 to Rosario Avenue
2. EI Camino Real Resurfacing (Streetscape 3) — Rosario Avenue to San Anselmo Road
3. Santa Rosa Road Rehabilitation (ARRA) — Hwy 41 to Highway 101
4. Atascadero Avenue CIR— Hwy 41 to San Gabriel Road
5. Traffic Way Overlay— EI Camino Real to Bajada Avenue
6. Del Rio Road — San Anselmo Road to Potrero Road
7. Santa Cruz Road — EI Camino Real to Obispo Road
8. Ardilla Ave —San Anselmo Rd to Portola Road
9. Capistrano Avenue —West Mall Ave to Sycamore Avenue
10. Curbaril Avenue — Morro Rd to Highway 101
11. Del Rio Road — EI Camino Real to San Anselmo Road
12. EI Camino Real —Viejo Camino to EI Bordo Road
13. Graves Creek Road — Monterey Road to San Fernando Road
14. San Jacinto Road — EI Camino Real to Nogales Avenue
Local Streets
1. San Fernando Road Rehabilitation — Balboa Rd. to Graves Creek Road
2. Old Morro Road Landslide Repair
3. San Ramon Road Overlay— Hwy 101 Bridge to Santa Cruz Road
4. La Linea Avenue Overlay— EI Camino Real to EI Dorado Avenue
5. San Jacinto Avenue — EI Camino Real to Dolores Avenue
6. Rosario Avenue — EI Camino Real to Fresno Avenue
7. Plata Lane — EI Camino Real to end
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 11-13-12
8. San Diego Road Overlay—Atascadero Avenue to Colorado Road
9. Viejo Camino Overlay
10. Mountain View Rd — Portola Road to Santa Rosa Road
Bridge Projects
1. EI Camino Real Bridge Railing
2. Lewis Avenue Bridge
3. Garcia Road Bridge
Due to the economic downturn and the financial realities of federal, state and local
funding, future funding is projected to be substantially reduced, and likely will not allow
the City to maintain the historic level of road funding. Road maintenance and
rehabilitation for City streets have been budgeted at:
Fiscal Budget 2005-2007 $2.6 million
Fiscal Budget 2007-2009 $3.0 million
Fiscal Budget 2009-2011 $3.4 million
Fiscal Budget 2011-2013 $2.6 million
And, the current 5-year Capital Improvement Plan (not including the Del Rio Road
Interchange project) budgets the following road funds:
Fiscal Budget 2013-2015 $0.6 million
Fiscal Budget 2015-2017 $0.5 million
As these figures indicate, the current economic downturn is reducing the City's ability to
invest in road maintenance and repair. Fewer road repair and pavement preservation
projects will result in lower quality roads citywide, and higher long-term road
maintenance costs. In response to reduced funding, staff has now changed the focus
from overlays and road rehabilitations to the implementation of lower cost pavement
preservation surface treatments. It is a widely accepted industry standard that spending
funds on preservation (crack filling, seal coating, chip seals, etc.) delays or prevents
major restoration projects, and results in lower long-term costs.
Below is the "pavement preservation curve" that depicts the value of spending money
on preservation as opposed to allowing roads to deteriorate to the point that full depth
replacement is required:
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 11-13-12
PAVEMENT PRESERVATION1
Typical pal'.
dye,
- e�0 Spending$1 on
.40%Drop eft^/ pavement preservation
0 Good in Quality �, before this point...
'
...eliminates or
'o VKLT
� r i
c
c i v 75%of Life delays spending
.. Farr ----------------
-
d $6 to$14 on
E rehabilitation or
reconstruction
L Poor - here.
40%Drop i
in Quality y
Very Poor
12%oilite 'd"b..
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time(Years) ell
Sower:Nat ional Center l or(hvrvnent Neserca-iron.
Future funding of road maintenance and other infrastructure needs in the City will likely
require new funding sources, i.e. a citywide assessment, '/2-cent sales tax measure (as
Paso Robles attempted), bond measure, etc. Sales tax and local bond measures are
common throughout California. SLOCOG recently hired a consultant to poll County
residents on their potential support of such a measure for regional and local
transportation projects and received mixed results.
Atascadero Road Program Update
The Atascadero Road Program is based on our own local pavement management
strategy. Pavement management is the process of planning the maintenance and
repair of City streets, in order to optimize pavement conditions over the entire network.
Pavement management incorporates life cycle costs into a more systematic approach to
minor and major road maintenance and reconstruction projects. The needs of the entire
network as well as budget projections are considered before projects are executed.
Pavement management encompasses the many aspects and tasks needed to maintain
a quality pavement inventory, and ensure that the overall condition of the road network
can be sustained at desired levels.
Public Works staff are currently implementing a new in-depth analysis and monitoring of
road conditions within the City, using the StreetSaver pavement management system.
This software is the accepted industry leader in pavement management technology.
The road network and GIS information has been entered into the program, and this
winter the Operations staff will finalize a citywide evaluation and rating of all streets
within the City.
The resulting data will help the City compete for State and Federal funds by allowing us
to predict the effectiveness of requested grant monies invested in our roads. The City
will have an enhanced Pavement Condition Index (PCI) for all Circulation Plan roads
and local roads in the City. The rating scale is 100 being best and 0 being worst.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 11-13-12
Currently City roads overall are roughly estimated at a PCI of 70, which is considered
"fair," and is average compared to other cities in the County.
In addition to the new management software, some of the highlights of the current
Atascadero Road Program are:
• Strategies: Near future strategies for road repair, maintenance and
rehabilitation are to use our funds on a "safety first" basis with circulation system
roads having priority.
• Pot Holes: Public Works Operations staff continually identify and repair pot
holes and failed trenches, conduct routine road inspections to identify and repair
road problems as they are found, and enforce utility company repairs of failed
trenches.
• Funding: Strive for consistent and adequate funding for road maintenance.
This includes the use of the General Fund for road paving. Current budget
programs $2.6 million for road maintenance and rehabilitation.
• Trench Cuts: Trench Cut Ordinance. Studies have concluded that utility
trenching degrades and shortens the life of the surface of the road. This
degradation increases the frequency and cost of maintaining the road surface.
The Ordinance requires that trench cuts be constructed to City standards and
inspected. In-house inspection of projects in City right-of-ways has been
improved and is resulting in more contractor oversight and better workmanship.
• Neighborhood Road Repair: Approved provisions for non-licensed persons
to work in the Colony right-of-way. This has helped citizens maintain their non-
City-maintained roads.
• Development Requirements: Approved ordinance for road improvement
requirements for the construction and maintenance of roads for new
developments to mitigate the impact on the circulation system.
• Development Maintenance: Require development projects to provide
funding for future road maintenance of project roads through benefit assessment
districts or homeowner associations. Local streets within subdivisions are no
longer accepted into the City maintained road system.
• Paving Machine: Purchased paving machine and equipment to allow City
maintenance staff to pave local roads.
• Cold Mix: Creation of a Cold Mix Program. This Program makes asphalt-
patching cold mix material available to residents to fill potholes on non-City
maintained roads. The cold mix is available at Fire Station #1 off Traffic Way.
The public can access and load the material into their vehicles off of the Traffic
Way driveway ramp at no charge.
• Road Loan Program: This is a City-backed program that allows low interest
loans to neighborhoods that want to maintain and pave their non-City-maintained
road. A local bank loans the funds to the homeowners for the work, and the City
guarantees the loan, which provides a low fixed rate for the homeowner.
Residences on Otero Road, Ortega Road and Encinal Avenue have taken
advantage of this program, and their roads have been repaved.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 11-13-12
• Road Repaving: Local roads are repaved and repaired by in-house personnel
where possible and contractors.
• Staffing: The Streets and Parks divisions have been combined into a single
Facility Maintenance staff, of which four full-time staff members are allocated to
roads. We include Parks-allocated operations staff in the annual local road
repair projects like the Crack Fill Program, as needed. Staff has crack filled over
six miles of City streets over the past 18 months.
Analysis: Funding levels and road rehabilitation costs will drive what we can do in the
future. Future Capital Improvement Plan budgets show a significant decrease in road
maintenance funds.
Costs for Road Maintenance:
Listed below are current approximate costs for road maintenance.
Slurry / Chip Seal $ 80,000/mile
Overlay $ 300,000/mile
Cold-in-Place Recycling $ 400,000/mile
Overlay with fabric and leveling course $ 500,000/mile
Reconstruction $1,000,000/mile
These costs include design, inspection and minor surface drainage improvements for a
24-foot wide road by a contractor at prevailing wage.
Backlog in Road Maintenance
Listed below are two primary categories of roads, the miles of road, and the estimated
costs to perform needed maintenance on the roads.
Road Type Miles of Road Cost
Circulation Plan Roads 61 $16,600,000
City Maintained Local Roads 77 $14,000,000
Circulation roads that are in need of immediate pavement restoration are:
• Santa Barbara Road West — Atascadero Avenue to US 101
• EI Camino Real — San Anselmo Road to Del Rio Road
• Santa Lucia Avenue — Highway 101 to Santa Ana Road
• San Anselmo Road — EI Camino Real to Del Rio Road
• Portola Road — Hwy 41 to Ardilla Avenue
For order of magnitude estimating, if the City were to undertake a Citywide chip-seal
program of local neighborhood roads and perform 7.7 miles per year, it would cost
approximately $800,000 per year for ten years to resurface all neighborhood roads in
town. This does not include the significant full-depth repairs needed on some roads.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 11-13-12
Another area of immediate concern is the replacement of existing corrugated metal
culverts that are essentially rusted out. A recent survey of all storm drains under City
streets has identified numerous immediate replacement projects where the invert of the
culverts have completely disintegrated. Six such culverts were replaced this year alone.
Existing Funding Sources and Balances
Listed below are funding sources that the City uses for road maintenance and
rehabilitation on an annual basis:
• Gas Tax Fund. This amount varies from year to year depending on the amount
collected by the State. All of these funds and funds from the general fund are
currently used to operate the Streets Division, including signal operations and
maintenance, street crews, asphalt patching, street striping, street sign maintenance
and replacement and other street maintenance costs.
• Urban State Highway Account Funds. The funds are authorized through TEA and
These funds are allocated annually by formula through San Luis Obispo Council of
Governments (SLOCOG). They are distributed to the City through project grants.
• Transportation Development Act Funds (TDA). These funds are used to operate
Atascadero Transit and pay the Cities share of San Luis Obispo Regional Transit
Authority costs. Any remaining TDA funds (also known as LTF funds) can be, and
are used on road projects.
• State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). These funds are allocated
through San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG). The amount of these
funds and the frequency of the awards vary depending on state politics,
programming and fund balances. Currently, the California Transportation
Commission (CTC) is not allowing any of these funds to be used for road
maintenance and rehabilitation due to the need for funding of new roads and bridges
and capacity increasing projects.
• Maintenance Districts. These are older roads that have funding collected from the
residences on the road, through property taxes, to maintain the road. They may only
be used on roads they are collected for. The amount of funds collected in these
districts is very small and is currently insufficient for current regular maintenance
costs. The City uses the funds for minor pavement patching and shoulder
maintenance once funds accumulate.
• Assessment Districts. The City has required new development to maintain any roads
that they build, for their subdivision, due to the shortfall in funding for existing roads.
Several large subdivisions (Las Lomas and De Anza) have chosen creation of
Benefit Assessment Districts (BADs) to maintain the roads. An engineer's report
determines how much needs to be collected, and the amount is collected on the
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 11-13-12
property tax bill, and annual property owner meetings are held. The City receives the
funds and maintains the roads.
• Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006
(Proposition 113). This State proposition will provide one time funds for local road
maintenance. The final increment of Prop 1 B funds will be used in the spring for the
EI Camino Real Resurfacing Project between Von's and Santa Rosa Road.
Staff has projected existing revenue sources over the next five years and applied them
to the 5-Year Capital Improvement Program as approved in the 2011/2013 City Budget.
This analysis shows that the 5-Year Capital Program has been greatly reduced under
current budget projections. This does not account for potential State government raids
on existing funding or above average inflation.
Local Road Maintenance
Council budgeted roughly 50% of road funds to local roads in the 2011/2013 budget.
Public Works operations division continues to perform "crack fill" sealing on City-
maintained local roads in the spring and fall each year. Contract services such as street
sweeping essentially have been eliminated to meet budget constraints.
The criteria used in selecting City-maintained local roads for paving is as follows:
• City-maintained local roads identified in the Circulation Element.
• Poor condition of road surface where safety impacts are evident (pot holes, base
failure, and extreme alligator cracking).
• Population served by the road, highest ADT (Average Daily Traffic) gets priority. We
will select local roads that serve the most residences.
• Minimize traffic control costs. Public Works has a small maintenance staff, and
proper traffic control can require considerable manpower. We look for roads that
can easily be closed to through-traffic or where traffic control does not create
significant costs.
Staff has completed the major road repair projects in the 2011-2013 budget. Unless
additional unanticipated Gas Tax funding is realized, only crack filling and pot hole
repairs are budgeted in the upcoming two to three years.
Circulation Plan Road Maintenance
Circulation Plan Roads are roads that have higher volumes of traffic and affect a larger
percentage of the community. They are also roads that are eligible for State and
Federal funding. Council budgeted roughly 50% of road funds to Circulation Roads, or
$1.1 million in the 2011/2013.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 11-13-12
Bike Lanes, Pedestrian Access and Trails
An additional consideration when paving Circulation Roads is the extent of
improvements to better accommodate bicycles and pedestrians. Many of Atascadero's
roads are narrow, on hillside terrain and do not have desired shoulder space for bike
lanes and pedestrian paths. Public Works staff evaluates road rehabilitation projects to
determine where improvements can be made for bicyclists and pedestrians, in
accordance with the recently adopted Bicycle Master Plan. The costs to construct or
improve bike lanes and pedestrian paths in coordination with a road rehabilitation
project can result in a significant project cost increase.
In many locations throughout Atascadero, road widening to accommodate bike lanes
and pedestrian paths would result in substantial grading, installation of retaining walls,
drainage reconfigurations, and tree removal or utility pole relocations. Below is an
example of the potential cost increases related to the installation of bike lanes and
pedestrian paths on two past road rehabilitation projects:
Scheduled road rehabilitation Cost for road surface Cost with pedestrian and
project rehabilitation only bike lane improvements
San Jacinto — ECR to Nogales $ 266,200 $ 482,600
Del Rio- Obispo to San Anselmo $ 522,500 $ 874,800
Sub-Total costs w/o Contingency $ 788,700 $ 1,357,400
or inspection
Inspection Services @ 5% $ 39,500 $ 67,900
Contingency @ 20% $ 157,740 $ 271,500
Total projected project cost $ 985,940 $ 1,696,800
Based on the Engineer's estimates, the cost to include pedestrian and bicycle
improvements to these projects would have been approximately $568,700.00, not
including the additional inspection cost and contingency. This Engineer's estimate is
based on a road widening project that would accommodate a bike lane in each direction
and a four-foot wide decomposed granite pathway on each road shoulder.
In order to pay for these additional improvements, funding would need to be diverted
from other scheduled road rehabilitation projects.
Emergency Access Routes
Background: Atascadero is a unique City in the way it was first subdivided. In most
cities, lots are created in subdivisions and the roads are constructed at the same time.
In Atascadero the entire Colony was subdivided into lots in 1914 and the roads were
built at different times. This left some road sections unbuilt.
Staff continues to work with several neighborhoods to identify potential funding
opportunities to add a second access. Current neighborhoods with identified second
access / emergency access needs are:
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 11-13-12
• Barranco Road / Carmelita Ave
• San Diego Road / Toloso Road
• Llano Road / Balboa Road
Conclusions:
• City staff estimates that the total cost of all currently needed maintenance and
rehabilitation is $46.1 million for City maintained roads and bridges.
• City staff estimates that it would be necessary to allocate a minimum of $2.3
million per year to maintain the current pavement condition of the road system.
• The City continues to make progress on implementing its Pavement
Management Program, however stable future funding for road rehabilitation
projects remains in question.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 11-13-12
1918 I.Lim �� 19781 i
sA'�S
A tascadero City Council
Staff Report — Public Works Department
Historic City Hall Sidewalk
(Design Standard Exception)
RECOMMENDATION:
Council approve modifications to the Downtown Streetscape Standards for the curb,
gutter and sidewalk surrounding Historic City Hall, and direct staff to finalize the design
process.
REPORT IN BRIEF:
The City, as well as several private developers, has completed streetscape projects
using the adopted Downtown Design Standards for sidewalk, lighting and landscape
details in the Downtown area. These projects included specific materials and color
requirements. The color and material requirements are based on staff, City Council and
public input during the planning, study and implementation of the Council's vision for
the Downtown. Through this public process, the design elements for the Streetscape
projects were adopted, and improvements since that time have been guided by those
standards.
The Historic City Hall Project, as any City project, is subject to these same standards
and is required to install street improvements in accordance with these adopted
standards. However, due to the sensitive historic nature of the building and the
surrounding grounds, the project architect, Pfieffer Partners, has expressed concerns
about the incompatibility of the adopted Downtown Standards with respect to colors,
materials and lighting.
Staff is requesting the City Council provide direction on proposed modifications to the
Downtown Standards, specifically for the block containing the Historic City Hall. Based
on this direction, staff will finalize the design and bring the projects to construction.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 11-13-12
DISCUSSION:
Background: The City Council approved the Atascadero Downtown Revitalization Plan
on July 25, 2000. The purpose of The Downtown Revitalization Plan is to:
• Implement the City's General Plan and Redevelopment Plan with a detailed focus
on the Downtown Area;
• Develop a community consensus on an overall vision for the Downtown Area;
• Coordinate public and private investments in the area to realize the vision; and
• Enhance the Downtown's character with public improvements constructed using
approved streetscape design elements.
The implementation of the Revitalization Plan has included public and private
Downtown Streetscape Projects on EI Camino Real, Traffic Way, East and West Mall,
Palma Avenue, and currently on Capistrano Avenue (Transit Center). Elements of
Atascadero Streetscape are medians, bulb outs, enhanced sidewalks, decorative
streetlights, benches, urns, trash cans, street trees and other elements.
The City Council approved the specific design elements for Atascadero Streetscape on
September 24, 2002. The City Council later endorsed the Implementation Strategy for
the Atascadero Downtown Revitalization Plan March 8, 2005. This Strategy provides
for street and other improvements, and approved a Downtown Revitalization Plan
Vision for the Downtown area shown below:
f Pedestrian", _
Bridge
t
Ped
a i
e+. 5
Bridge fr-�
, l
r —
Downtown Revitalization Area
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 11-13-12
This Strategy listed specific Goals and Priorities, which apply to Streetscape, as follows:
Goals
• Establish a safe, pedestrian friendly scale and character that distinguishes
Downtown Atascadero from other commercial areas in the City.
• Improve the Downtown circulation system for vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians.
• Improve the appearance of EI Camino Real and reduce its impact as a
pedestrian barrier through traffic calming measures.
Priority
• Install street lighting improvements to improve pedestrian safety and security.
• Install streetscape improvements to improve pedestrian safety and provide traffic
calming.
With these goals and priorities in mind, the City Council has directed completion of four
phases of Streetscape projects, the Lewis Avenue Bridge, and the modification of the EI
Camino Real Bridge.
Analysis: The Historic City Hall is on the National Registry of Historic Buildings and is
subject to the State Historic Building Code (SHBC). The SHBC requires a higher
standard with respect to construction methods, materials and appearance standards.
The project architect is charged with maintaining these high standards and providing
overall attention to detail during the design and construction process to ensure the
appearance of the building, grounds and frontage improvements are consistent with the
historic nature of the building.
In that capacity the architect has recommended that the sidewalk color, paver materials
and color, landscaping, and street lighting around the frontage of the building be
modified to more closely mimic the details of the restored building, while still
maintaining the goals of the Downtown Revitalization Plan.
The following are pictures of the adopted and current streetscape design elements:
ITEM NUMBER: C -2
DATE: 11-13-12
k �-
i�
Picture 1 — Downtown style sidewalk with tumbled roman pavers
Picture 2 — Planted Urn on Bulb-out.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 11-13-12
Picture 3 — EI Camino Real Streetscape Scene (at Carlton Hotel)
The project architect and City staff are recommending the following modifications to the
adopted Downtown Design Standards so that the frontage improvements more closely
match onsite improvements.
1. Substitute mixed assorted color brick for the standard Air Vol Block
"Brown Charcoal Blend - Tumbled Roman 1" paver and soldier band.- The
architect and landscape designer have expressed concern that the standard
colors and shapes for the paver and soldier band do not tie into the colors and
period of the building. They are recommending a mixed brick blend for the
standard streetscape paver and soldier band. The mixed brick blend is intended
to be a transition between the colors and textures of the standard downtown
streetscape and the building's historic colors and textures. The amount of
banding and paving will still conform with the City's downtown standards.
2. Replace additional decorative street lighting with the Enhanced Exterior
Lighting Package for the Project. Current downtown standards require that
street lights be installed along the street frontage at approximately 75-feet on
center. The Project currently has street lights at three of the four corners,
however at least five additional lights would need to be installed to meet the
current downtown standards. Our exterior lighting consultants and the project
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 11-13-12
architect have expressed concern that these additional street lights will conflict
with and compete with the proposed enhanced exterior lighting package. The
current proposed Enhanced Exterior Lighting Package includes repairing the
historical landscape globe lights (2 on each of the four sides), up-lighting the
columns at the front and back of the building, washing the top of the dome with
light, lighting the dome portico at the front and back of the building, lighting each
of the 4 tablature inscriptions, washing the upper dome with light, washing the
walls below the skirt roof with light, up-lighting the marble columns, moving the
existing 3 street lights to more appropriate locations (behind the sidewalk and at
the corner) and adding a street light to the fourth corner. The lighting levels from
the proposed Enhanced Exterior Lighting Package would provide the improved
pedestrian safety and security, while highlighting the building and improving the
view corridor from EI Camino Real and Highway 101.
3. Incorporate park benches, bike racks, trash cans, and electrical within the
project landscape rather than along the project frontage- The standard
downtown streetscape requires benches, bike racks, trash cans and electrical
outlets to be placed along the sidewalk. In order to maintain the view shed and
historical look of the project, staff and the designers are recommending that
these amenities be placed within the Project landscape.
4. Eliminate street trees, and tree grates- The standard downtown streetscape
requires street trees and the appropriate tree grates to be placed between the
street and the sidewalk at an approximate interval of 35-feet on center. It is
estimated that 12 street trees would be normally required around City Hall within
the curb, gutter and sidewalk. In order to avoid blocking the view of the building
and more in keeping with the historical landscape of the building, staff is
proposing that street trees not be installed around the building.
The construction of the City Hall frontage improvements is scheduled to begin this
winter and conclude by spring of 2013 prior to the completion of the City Hall
Restoration.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The modifications of the of the Downtown Streetscape Standards for the curb, gutter
and sidewalk surrounding Historic City Hall will have a slightly negative fiscal impact on
the City. The higher quality materials and lighting standards being proposed are
expected to cost slightly more than the standard downtown streetscape requirements.
If the modifications are approved, the Sitescape Bid Package and the Enhanced
Exterior Lighting Bid Package are expected to be brought before Council early in 2013.
Projected costs are to be funded from budgeted Historical Rehabilitation funds.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 11-13-12
ALTERNATIVES:
The City Council may decide to direct staff to incorporate all, part or none of the above
recommended changes to the Downtown Standards for the Historic City Hall
Rehabilitation Project.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A — Downtown Redevelopment Map
Exhibit B — Street Improvement Plans
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 11-13-12
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
HOW
r
1 '
I-ALA IR
t
A' y
t
. r O
r t =7
Cl
47
t
f
0
I
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 11-13-12
Exhibit B
Exhibit B
IMPROVFV.FNT PIANS FOR
ROTUNDA BUILDING
STREETSCAPE
. O
Lam`
CITY OF ATASCADERO dt'�
Z ..� COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO we MAP
STATE OF CALIFORNIA � S
AdjhF
sig
%-=r up
ITEM NUMBER: C -2
DATE: 11-13-12
Exhibit B
01 _
UF
r w PALMA AVE.
r.
i -
C2
� t
WEST MALL.
pe 0
•
` i �� <
4
wnaon.ww wr ue.,.suw xz
- o
Wkkhof
C3
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 11-13-12
Exhibit B
LEWIS AVE.
}...�
01)
1. .M..... f I L 7
� r
wwr'nnr.t.n.wr •wwnct�..-w nrrr
IfY16 AVf►IUf ffC AOflf �
w' s
�khot _
gr
roup
ITEM NUMBER: C -2
DATE: 11-13-12
Exhibit B
W WM a.YM ur/IW WlIM dli,b�ri _
30
V3� ,519 ® l�/�ri���i � •'�_`� -'11
L
\ \ MAST VA - '""" } 8
_ ...`... r........-...... ....... -..._......................a..- — - -•-•--.--.xc;_�
MAL
w• - LASI MI 11C::I
7KOIIU � 11
nit
-
'r- Ikhof
W.I
O •�-� w.wc aw f OY CS
TTt
LLF
' 'r O<
era- u
"law v
qr-
1�T i3� I •~ �� �i , �_y� ,,�L� ��"��:�,-"'ram'_'
sL_izs-
`' at- ,.� -- c
IH
gig _ _. -__-r-•- �. Iknor
ss�s z
A•e�g a lopOr- pr u
C6