Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
032613 - CC Agenda-combined
. yl 'a`$ i979CITY OF A TASCADERO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Tuesday, March 26, 2013 City Hall Council Chambers 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, California City Council Closed Session: 5:30 p.m. City Council Regular Session: 6:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION: 5:30 p.m. 1. CLOSED SESSION -- PUBLIC COMMENT 2. COUNCIL LEAVES CHAMBERS TO BEGIN CLOSED SESSION 3. CLOSED SESSION -- CALL TO ORDER a. Conference with Legal Counsel — Existing Litigation Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Save Atascadero v. City of Atascadero, et al. San Luis Obispo Superior Court Case No. 128230 4. CLOSED SESSION -- ADJOURNMENT 5. COUNCIL RETURNS TO CHAMBERS 6. CLOSED SESSION -- REPORT REGULAR SESSION — CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council Member Fonzi ROLL CALL: Mayor O'Malley Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant Council Member Fonzi Council Member Kelley Council Member Moreno APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call PRESENTATION: 1. Proclamation for "Autism Awareness Month" A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the item before action is taken. DRAFT MINUTES: Council meeting draft minutes are listed on the Consent Calendar for approval of the minutes. Should anyone wish to request an amendment to draft minutes, the item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and their suggestion will be considered by the City Council. If anyone desires to express their opinion concerning issues included in draft minutes, they should share their opinion during the Community Forum portion of the meeting.) 1. City Council Draft Action Minutes — February 26, 2013 ■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Draft Action Minutes of February 26, 2013. [City Clerk] 2. City Council / Planning Commission Special Joint Meeting Draft Action Minutes — February 26, 2013 ■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Council / Planning Commission Special Joint Meeting Draft Action Minutes of February 26, 2013. [City Clerk] 3. City Council Draft Action Minutes — March 12, 2013 ■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Draft Action Minutes of March 12, 2013. [City Clerk] 4. Historic City Hall Project Bid Award: ACH-14 Audio-Video System ■ Fiscal Impact: $253,581.85 in budgeted City Hall Project Funds including funding from the 2010 bond issue. ■ Recommendations: Council: 1. Award the bid in the amount of $253,581.85 for the ACH-14 Audio- Video System installation for the Historic City Hall Project to Pro Sound CA, Inc.; and, 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with Pro Sound CA, Inc. in the amount of 253,581.85 for the ACH-14 Audio-Video System installation for the Historic City Hall Project; and, 3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder upon satisfactory completion of the project. [Administrative Services] 5. February 2013 Accounts Payable and Payroll ■ Fiscal Impact: $2,038,449.04. ■ Recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for February 2013. [Administrative Services] 6. Title 9 Planning and Zoning Text Amendments PLN 2012-1444 / ZCH 2012-0167 (City of Atascadero) ■ Fiscal Impact: There are no known fiscal impacts to the City at this time. Additional permit and business license revenue may be derived by applicants wishing to open new indoor recreational business here in the City. ■ Recommendation: Council adopt on second reading, by title only, the Draft Ordinance, to approve PLN 2012-1444 (Zone Text Change ZCH 2012-0167). [Community Development] 7. Establishment of the Atascadero Tourism Business Improvement District (ATBID) ■ Fiscal Impact: None for this action. There will be ongoing costs of administration of the ATBID, which will be partially covered by a 1% administration fee charged against the assessments. ■ Recommendations: Council: 1. Adopt the Draft Resolution declaring the intention to establish the Atascadero Tourism Business Improvement District; and, 2. Set April 9, 2013 as the date of the public hearing on the establishment of the proposed ATBID and the levy of assessments. [City Manager] 8. Agreement with Caltrans for Project Study Report (PSR-PDS) for the Del Rio Road Freeway Interchange Project ■ Fiscal Impact: This action will result in the expenditure of up to $104,000 over an estimated two-year period in budgeted Circulation Impact Fees funds. ■ Recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Caltrans for review of engineering and environmental studies for required planning and design approval of the Del Rio Road Freeway Interchange for an amount not to exceed $104,000. [Public Works] UPDATES FROM THE CITY MANAGER: (The City Manager will give an oral report on any current issues of concern to the City Council.) COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to address the Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to three minutes. Please state your name for the record before making your presentation. Comments made during Community Forum will not be a subject of discussion. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless changed by the Council. Any members of the public who have questions or need information, may contact the City Clerk's Office, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at 470-3400, or mtorgerson atascadero.org.) B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. PLN 2099-0848 / APL 2013-0017 / Amendment to CUP 2005-0157 - Appeal to the City Council - Affordable Housing Requirements (1155 EI Camino Real / Oakhaven Village, LLC) ■ Ex Parte Communications: Ex Parte communications are any communications to a Council Member, concerning a pending matter before the Council, that occur in the absence of the other Council Members. Examples may include conversations, site visits, public meetings, etc. ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendations: Council: 1. Adopt Draft Resolution "A" granting the applicant's appeal and amending condition 14 of Conditional Use Permit 2005-0157 (City Council Resolution 2005-076) to reflect a requirement that the project provide deed restrictions for 12 moderate income units within the project. OR 2. Adopt Draft Resolution "B" denying the applicant's appeal and amending Condition 11 of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) (City Council Resolution 2005-077) consistent with the approved Conditional Use Permit reflecting a requirement that the project provide deed restrictions for two (2) very low, five (5) low income and five (5) moderate income units within the project. [Community Development] C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. Planning Commission Appointments ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendations: Council: 1. In accordance with Ordinance No. 565, adopted on February 26, 2013, select new members to fill the directly appointed Planning Commission positions whose terms will commence March 29, 2013 and continue through December 31, 2014; and, 2. Review the six applications supplied by interested citizens and select two for the at-large positions on the Planning Commission. [City Clerk] 2. Consolidated Fixed Route Transit Service "Term Sheet" Approval • Fiscal Impact: Consolidation of fixed route services in the North County will provide an estimated cost savings of $152,008 to Atascadero in the first year. ■ Recommendation: Council approve the "Term Sheet" between the Cities of Atascadero and Paso Robles, the County of San Luis Obispo, the San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority (RTA) and the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) which defines the roles, responsibilities and financial commitments in connection with the implementation of consolidated fixed route local and regional service in North San Luis Obispo County. A legally binding agreement will be brought back to the Council at a later date once all councils and boards have considered the Term Sheet and the outlined program for consolidation. [Public Works] 3. Storm Water Regulation Update — Oral Report ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendation: Council receive oral report. [Public Works] COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative, Council Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities. Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. The Council may take action on items listed on the Agenda.) D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: (The following represent standing committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary): Mayor O'Malley 1. City / Schools Committee 2. County Mayors Round Table 3. Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA) 4. SLO Council of Governments (SLOCOG) 5. SLO Regional Transit Authority (RTA) Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant 1. City/ Schools Committee 2. City of Atascadero Finance Committee 3. Community Action Partnership of SLO County 4. League of California Cities — Council Liaison Council Member Fonzi 1. Air Pollution Control District 2. City of Atascadero Design Review Committee 3. Oversight Board for Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency of Atascadero 4. SLO Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) - alternate Council Member Kelley 1. Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Committee 2. City of Atascadero Design Review Committee 3. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC) 4. Homeless Services Oversight Council Council Member Moreno 1. California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA) Board 2. City of Atascadero Finance Committee (Chair) E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND / OR ACTION: 1. City Council 2. City Clerk 3. City Treasurer 4. City Attorney 5. City Manager F. ADJOURNMENT: Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. Correspondence submitted at this public hearing will be distributed to the Council and available for review in the City Clerk's office. I, Victoria Randall, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing agenda for the March 26, 2013 Regular Session of the Atascadero City Council was posted on March 19, 2013, at the Atascadero City Hall, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 and was available for public review in the Customer Service Center at that location. Signed this 19`h day of March, 2013, at Atascadero, California. Victoria Randall, Deputy City Clerk City of Atascadero City of Atascadero WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 6:00 p.m. unless there is a Community Redevelopment Agency meeting commencing at 6:00 p.m. in which event the Council meeting will commence immediately following the conclusion of the Community Redevelopment Agency meeting. Council meetings will be held at the City Hall Council Chambers, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero. Matters are considered by the Council in the order of the printed Agenda. Regular Council meetings are televised live, audio recorded and videotaped for future playback. Charter Communication customers may view the meetings on Charter Cable Channel 20 or via the City's website at www.atascadero.org. Meetings are also broadcast on radio station KPRL AM 1230. Contact the City Clerk for more information (470-3400). Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public inspection during City Hall business hours at the Front Counter of City Hall, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, and on our website, www.atascadero.org. An agenda packet is also available for public review at the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road. Contracts, Resolutions and Ordinances will be allocated a number once they are approved by the City Council. The minutes of this meeting will reflect these numbers. All documents submitted by the public during Council meetings that are either read into the record or referred to in their statement will be noted in the minutes and available for review in the City Clerk's office. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office or the City Clerk's Office, both at (805) 470-3400. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service. TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA Under Agenda item, "COMMUNITY FORUM", the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having business with the Council to approach the lectern and be recognized. 1. Give your name for the record (not required) 2. State the nature of your business. 3. All comments are limited to 3 minutes. 4. All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council. 5. No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any other individual, absent or present This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum (unless changed by the Council). If you wish to use a computer presentation to support your comments, you must notify the City Clerk's office at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Digital presentations must be brought to the meeting on a USB drive or CD. You are required to submit to the City Clerk a printed copy of your presentation for the record. Please check in with the City Clerk before the meeting begins to announce your presence and turn in the printed copy. TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS (from Title 2, Chapter 1 of the Atascadero Municipal Code) Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will give their report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being considered to step up to the lectern. If you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way: 1. You must approach the lectern and be recognized by the Mayor 2. Give your name (not required) 3. Make your statement 4. All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council 5. No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any other individual, absent or present 6. All comments limited to 3 minutes The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public comments will be heard by the Council. ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 03/26/13 o� 1915 R NOD --- C� E; � CITY OF ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES Tuesday, February 26, 2013 City Hall Council Chambers 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, California City Council Regular Session: 6:00 p.m. City Council / Planning Commission During Recess of the City Special Joint Meeting — Eagle Ranch Council Regular Session REGULAR SESSION — CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M. Mayor O'Malley called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and Planning Commissioner Ward led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Council Members Kelley, Moreno, Fonzi, Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant, and Mayor O'Malley Absent: None Others Present: City Clerk / Assistant to City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson Atascadero City Council February 26,2013 Page 1 of 5 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard, Community Development Director Warren Frace, Public Works Director Russ Thompson, Police Chief Jerel Haley, Fire Chief Kurt Stone, and City Attorney Brian Pierik. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: MOTION: By Council Member Fonzi and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant to approve the agenda. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. PRESENTATION: 1. Proclamation for "World Spay Day" The City Council presented Sherry Chapman of the North County Humane Society a Proclamation declaring today World Spay Day in Atascadero. COMMUNITY FORUM: The following citizens spoke during Community Forum: Mike Casey, Mitch Paskin, Kevin Rice, Karyn Sturtevant, and Chuck Ward. Mayor O'Malley closed the COMMUNITY FORUM period. RECESS: Mayor O'Malley called a recess at 6:16 p.m. for the City Council / Planning Commission Joint Special Meeting on Eagle Ranch RECONVENE: Mayor O'Malley reconvened the meeting of the City Council at the conclusion of the City Council / Planning Commission Joint Special Meeting at 9:28 p.m. A. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Historic City Hall Project Bid Award: ACH-15 Landscape / Hardscape ■ Fiscal Impact: $529,010.40 in budgeted City Hall Project Funds including funding from the 2010 bond issue. ■ Recommendations: Council: Atascadero City Council February 26,2013 Page 2 of 5 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 03/26/13 1. Award the bid in the amount of $529,010.40 for the ACH-15 Landscape / Hardscape services for the Historic City Hall Project to G. Sosa Construction, Inc.; and, 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with G. Sosa Construction, Inc. in the amount of $ 529,010.40 for the ACH-15 Landscape / Hardscape services for the Historic City Hall Project; and, 3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder upon satisfactory completion of the project. [Administrative Services] 2. California Cultural and Historical Endowment (CCHE) Grant Agreement ■ Fiscal Impact: Increased grant revenues in the amount of $28,850 for fire/life safety, code, and ADA required upgrades of Atascadero's Historic City Hall. ■ Recommendations: Council: 1. Adopt Draft Resolution approving the grant agreement with California Cultural and Historical Endowment for the Historic City Hall Project; and, 2. Authorize the Administrative Services Director to execute the grant agreement. [Administrative Services] 3. Amendment to Planning Commission Terms - Second Reading of Ordinance ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendation: Council adopt on second reading, by title only, the Draft Ordinance, amending Section 2-9.02 of the Atascadero Municipal Code relating to the appointment of Planning Commission Members. [City Manager] 4. Information Technology Consolidation and Simplification Plan ■ Fiscal Impact: The total fiscal impact is the appropriation of $151,000 in Technology Replacement Funds. ■ Recommendations: Council: 1. Authorize the Administrative Services Director to appropriate $151 ,000 in Technology Replacement Funds for the Technology Consolidation and Simplification Plan; and, 2. Authorize the purchase of $133,258.27 in equipment from Helixstorm for the Technology Consolidation and Simplification Plan. [City Manager] 5. Wastewater Master Plan Update Professional Engineering Services Contract Award (Contract for Professional Services) ■ Fiscal Impact: $118,485.00 of budgeted Wastewater funds. ■ Recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with Michael K. Nunley and Associates for professional Atascadero City Council February 26,2013 Page 3 of 5 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 03/26/13 engineering services to update the City's Wastewater and Collection System Master Plans for the amount of$118,485.00. [Public Works] MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant and seconded by Council Member Kelley to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (#A-1: Contract No. 2013-008, #A-2.1: Resolution No. 2013-002, #A-2.2: Contract No. 2013-009, #A-3: Ordinance No. 565, #A-5: Contract No. 2013-010) UPDATES FROM THE CITY MANAGER: City Manager Wade McKinney gave an update on projects and issues within the City. B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Proposed Aggressive Animal Ordinance ■ Ex Parte Communications: ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendation: Council introduce for first reading by title only, the Draft Ordinance adding Section 4-1 .121 to Chapter 1 of Title 4 of the Atascadero Municipal Code, creating an infraction offense for owners of menacing and aggressive animals [Police] Police Chief Jerel Haley gave the staff report and answered questions from the Council. PUBLIC COMMENT: None MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant and seconded by Council Member Kelley to introduce for first reading by title only, the Draft Ordinance adding Section 4-1.121 to Chapter 1 of Title 4 of the Atascadero Municipal Code, creating an infraction offense for owners of menacing and aggressive animals. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. Council Member Fonzi stated that she voted yes on Item #13-1 with reservations. C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: None. Atascadero City Council February 26,2013 Page 4 of 5 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 03/26/13 COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: Council Members Fonzi Kelley brought up the fact that the County is proposing to put in place a Veterans' Court. The Veterans' Court would deal with minor infractions by veterans that are returning from war that may have other issues that need to be considered, such as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). She felt the City Council may want to weigh in on this issue. She asked if staff could review this issue and give the Council a recommendation as to whether they should weigh in. Council Member Kelley stated that he is aware that the North County Connection is considering providing additional help to veterans in the community. Mayor O'Malley asked the City Manager for input. Mr. McKinney stated that he is unaware of these proposals, and can collect more information for the City Council to review. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: Council Member Fonzi 1. SLO Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) — alternate — Paso Robles' sphere of influence was approved. Paso Robles has a purple belt, which is vineyards and tasting rooms that would be exempt from the County's events ordinance. E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND / OR ACTION: None F. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor O'Malley adjourned the meeting at 9:50 p.m. MINUTES PREPARED BY: Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C. City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager Atascadero City Council February 26,2013 Page 5 of 5 ITEM NUMBER: A- 2 DATE: 03/26/13 SPECIAL JOINT MEETING Atascadero City Council Atascadero Planning Commission Request to Begin Eagle Ranch Specific Plan EIR Tuesday, February 26, 2013, 6:00 P.M. DRAFT MINUTES Atascadero City Hall Council Chambers 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, California Mayor O'Malley called the meeting to order at 6:16 p.m. ROLL CALL: Council Present: Council Members Kelley, Moreno, Fonzi, Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant, and Mayor O'Malley Commission Present: Commissioners Bentz, Colamarino, Cooper, Dariz, Wolff, Anderson and Chairperson Ward Absent: None Others Present: City Clerk / Assistant to City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard, Community Development Director Warren Frace, Public Works Director Russ Thompson, Police Chief Jerel Haley, Fire Chief Kurt Stone, and City Attorney Brian Pierik. Joint Meeting of Atascadero City Council &Planning Commission Draft Minutes of February 26,2013 Page 1 of 4 ITEM NUMBER: A- 2 DATE: 03/26/13 Commissioner Colamarino announced that due to the fact that his property is within 500 feet of the project boundary, he will recuse himself from this meeting. STUDY SESSION: 1. Request to Begin Eagle Ranch Specific Plan EIR Joint City Council & Planning Commission Study Session — PLN 2008-1280 (Eagle Ranch, LLC / RRM Design Group) ■ Fiscal Impact: The applicant is responsible for the cost of the EIR process; there is no fiscal impact to the City. ■ Recommendation: The Atascadero Design Review Committee (DRC) recommends: City Council and Planning Commission review the proposed project design and authorize City Staff and the applicant to begin the EIR process with project alternatives. Community Development Director Warren Frace gave the staff report and answered questions from the Council and Planning Commission. Vic Montgomery of RRM, a representative of the project owners, made a presentation of the project and also answered questions from the Council and Planning Commission. Ex Parte Council Member Kelley stated that he has attended most public meetings on this topic and met with the applicant. Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant stated that he has met with some neighboring property owners and the applicant. Mayor O'Malley stated that he attended a City tour of the site, has met with the applicant, and met with some neighboring property owners and their representatives. Council Member Fonzi stated she has a similar list of Ex Parte, and has also talked to LAFCo staff regarding the allocation that is going to be discussed between the City and the County. Council Member Moreno stated that she attended a public workshop, met with neighboring property owners, and has met with the applicant. Joint Meeting of Atascadero City Council &Planning Commission Draft Minutes of February 26,2013 Page 2 of 4 ITEM NUMBER: A- 2 DATE: 03/26/13 PUBLIC COMMENT: The following citizens spoke on this item: Ellen Beraud, David Tissue, O.W. Smith (Exhibit A), Mark Frasier, Mitch Paskin, Kathleen Daley, Paul Hyman(spoke twice), John Rinaldi, Lenore Sheeley, John Daly(spoke twice), Jim Patterson, Nancy Hyman, Terry Grabel (spoke twice), Justin Kerr. Mayor O'Malley closed the Public Comment period. Mayor O'Malley recessed the meeting at 8:44 p.m. Mayor O'Malley reconvened the meeting at 8:57 p.m. Community Director Frace provided a summary of the process from this point forward, through the EIR process, through the annexation process, to the request for approval. There was Council discussion of the proposed project design. MOTION: By Commissioner Bentz and seconded by Commissioner Cooper to recommend the City Council authorize City Staff and the applicant to begin the EIR process with project alternatives, and include the following recommendations from the Design Review Committee: 1. Options for more workforce housing in the Village Center and a smaller senior housing project (total project density stays the same); and, 2. A "Class I" type / off-street trail along entire length of Atascadero Ave. Motion passed 6:0 by a roll-call vote. MOTION: By Council Member Kelley and seconded by Council Member Fonzi to authorize City Staff and the applicant to begin the EIR process with project alternatives, and include the following: 1. Options for more workforce housing in the Village Center and a smaller senior housing project (total project density stays the same); and, 2. A "Class I" type / off-street trail along entire length of Atascadero Ave.; and, 3. Consideration of the possibility of an easement to link up to the ALPS trail; and, 4. Require an additional study of the traffic issues on roads between Atascadero Ave. and Santa Rosa Road. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. Joint Meeting of Atascadero City Council &Planning Commission Draft Minutes of February 26,2013 Page 3 of 4 ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 03/26/13 ADJOURNMENT: Mayor O'Malley adjourned the meeting at 9:27 p.m. MINUTES PREPARED BY: Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C. City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager The following exhibit is available for review in the City Clerk's office: Exhibit A— Prepared statement of O.W. Smith Joint Meeting of Atascadero City Council&Planning Commission Draft Minutes of February 26,2013 Page 4 of 4 ITEM NUMBER: A- 3 DATE: 03/26/13 R FT - y 1818 R 1979 \ -4- CAD]Ro CITY OF ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES Tuesday, March 12, 2013 City Hall Council Chambers 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, California City Council Closed Session: 5:30 p.m. City Council Regular Session: 6:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION: 5:30 p.m. Mayor O'Malley announced at 5:30 p.m. that the Council is going into Closed Session. 1. CLOSED SESSION -- PUBLIC COMMENT - None 2. COUNCIL LEAVES CHAMBERS TO BEGIN CLOSED SESSION 3. CLOSED SESSION -- CALL TO ORDER a. Conference with Legal Counsel — Existing Litigation Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Save Atascadero v. City of Atascadero, et al. San Luis Obispo Superior Court Case No. 128230 4. CLOSED SESSION -- ADJOURNMENT Atascadero City Council Draft Minutes of March 12,2013 Page 1 of 7 ITEM NUMBER: A- 3 DATE: 03/26/13 5. COUNCIL RETURNS TO CHAMBERS 6. CLOSED SESSION -- REPORT City Attorney Pierik announced that there was no reportable action taken. REGULAR SESSION — CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M. Mayor O'Malley called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. and Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Council Members Kelley, Moreno, Fonzi, Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant, and Mayor O'Malley Absent: None Others Present: City Clerk / Assistant to City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard, Community Development Director Warren Frace, Public Works Deputy Director David Athey, Police Chief Jerel Haley, Fire Chief Kurt Stone, and City Attorney Brian Pierik. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant and seconded by Council Member Fonzi to approve the agenda. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. PRESENTATION: 1. Presentation and Overview of Blades on Ice by Owner Derek Ehinger Mr. Ehinger introduced himself to the City Council and showed a video that showcased his ice rink. A. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. City Council Special Meeting / Strategic Planning Draft Action Minutes — January 25-26, 2013 ■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Special Meeting / Strategic Planning Draft Action Minutes of January 25-26, 2013. [City Clerk] Atascadero City Council Draft Minutes of March 12,2013 Page 2 of 7 ITEM NUMBER: A- 3 DATE: 03/26/13 2. City Council Draft Action Minutes — February 12, 2013 ■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Draft Action Minutes of December February 12, 2013. [City Clerk] 3. City Council Special Meeting Draft Action Minutes — February 19, 2013 • Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Special Meeting Draft Action Minutes of December February 19, 2013. [City Clerk] 4. January 2013 Accounts Payable and Payroll ■ Fiscal Impact: $2,798,055.58. ■ Recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for January 2013. [Administrative Services] 5. Aggressive Animal Ordinance ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendation: Council adopt on second reading, by title only, the Draft Ordinance adding Section 4-1 .121 to Chapter 1 of Title 4 of the Atascadero Municipal Code, creating an infraction offense for owners of menacing and aggressive animals. [Police] Mayor O'Malley pulled Item #A-3. MOTION: By Council Member Fonzi and seconded by Council Member Moreno to approve Item #1, 2, 4, & 5 of the Consent Calendar. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Sturtevant abstained on #A-2.) (#A-5: Ordinance No. 566) Mayor O'Malley explained that at the conclusion of the February 19th Council meeting where they interviewed applicants for the at-large Planning Commission positions, there was the following Council consensus: (from February 19, 2013 Council minutes) There was Council consensus to interview the candidates but not vote today. At the City Council meeting of March 26th, the City Council will terminate all Commissioners' terms and directly appoint five members. If any of the existing directly appointed Commissioners are not re-appointed, they will be given the opportunity to express an interest in the at-large positions before the City Council votes to select two citizens for these at-large positions. Mayor O'Malley asked the Council Members to announce who they were going to appoint to the new two-year terms. Each Council Member announced that they are re- appointing their existing Commissioners. Mayor O'Malley stated that since all of the directly appointed Commissioners are being re-appointed, he asked for Council consensus to direct staff to place the at-large Commissioner vote on the March 26, 2013 agenda. Atascadero City Council Draft Minutes of March 12,2013 Page 3 of 7 ITEM NUMBER: A- 3 DATE: 03/26/13 There was Council consensus to place the at-large Commissioner vote on the March 26, 2013 agenda. MOTION: By Council Member Fonzi and seconded by Council Member Kelley to approve Item #A-3 of the Consent Calendar. Motion passed 4:0 by a roll-call vote. (Sturtevant abstained) UPDATES FROM THE CITY MANAGER: City Manager Wade McKinney gave an update on projects and issues within the City. COMMUNITY FORUM: The following citizens spoke during Community Forum: Steve Shiveley, Marlene Lutz, Mitch Paskin, Karyn Sturtevant, Ron DeCarli, Don Ritter (Exhibit A), Michelle Lucey, Mark Hutchinson, Annie Clayton, and John Olson. Mayor O'Malley closed the COMMUNITY FORUM period. Mayor O'Malley asked City Manager McKinney to respond to Mr. Paskin's comments. Mr. McKinney explained the details of the Oak Ridge Estates project and stated that the City has acted appropriately and has enforced all requirements of the project. Mr. McKinney also stated that Mr. Paskin has received numerous documents and response memos from the City to answer his questions. B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Title 9 Planning and Zoning Text Amendment - PLN 2012-1444 / ZCH 2012-0167 (City of Atascadero) ■ Ex Parte Communications: ■ Fiscal Impact: There are no known fiscal impacts to the City at this time. Additional permit and business license revenue may be derived by applicants wishing to open new indoor recreational business here in the City. ■ Recommendation: Planning Commission Recommends: City Council introduce the Draft Ordinance for first reading, by title only, to approve PLN 2012-1444 (Zone Text Change ZCH 2012-0159) based on findings [Community Development] Community Development Director Warren Frace gave the staff report and answered questions from the Council. Atascadero City Council Draft Minutes of March 12,2013 Page 4 of 7 ITEM NUMBER: A- 3 DATE: 03/26/13 PUBLIC COMMENT: The following citizens spoke on this item: Don Ritter, Susan DeCarli, and John Olson. Mayor O'Malley closed the Public Comment period. MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant and seconded by Council Member Fonzi to introduce the Draft Ordinance for first reading, by title only, to approve PLN 2012-1444 (Zone Text Change ZCH 2012-0159) based on findings Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. PLN 2010-1361 - Toolbox & GHG Reduction Measure Review - Central Coast Greenhouse Gas Reduction Planning & Local Climate Action Plan ■ Fiscal Impact: Based on the measures selected by the Planning Commission, it would require two to three full time staff to implement the Climate Action Plan. However, due to existing budget constraints, the City does not intend to hire additional staff to complete these measures. If a Climate Action Plan is adopted by the City Council, the work load would be distributed across several departments (primarily Community Development and Public Works) and existing City staff would be responsible for implementing the actions identified. ■ Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends.- City ecommends.City Council review the greenhouse gas reduction measures which were selected, modified and added by the Planning Commission, and include those measures in a draft Climate Action Plan for the City of Atascadero. [Community Development] Community Development Director Warren Frace gave the staff report and answered questions from the Council. Mayor O'Malley recessed the meeting at 8:03 p.m. Mayor O'Malley reconvened the meeting at 8:14 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENT: The following citizens spoke on this item: Susan DeCarli, Ron DeCarli, and Ted Gilbert. Mayor O'Malley closed the Public Comment period. Atascadero City Council Draft Minutes of March 12,2013 Page 5 of 7 ITEM NUMBER: A- 3 DATE: 03/26/13 MOTION: By Council Member Kelley and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant to adopt the Draft Climate Action Plan proposed by the Planning Commission, with the following additions: • Add Galaxy Theatres and existing commercial developments to our Service Node Credit • Look at CNG fueling stations • Claim additional credit for our Park & Rides within town, as well as any PG&E park & ride programs • Look at additional bike lanes on State Route 41, specifically Morro Road • Commit to additional bike rack requirements • Add our Safe Routes to School Program to our Pedestrian Network Program • Ask for increased credit for our Route 9 Transit Program • Add additional street tree plantings along EI Camino Real • Staff to ask APCD to base our reductions on a per capita target and get a formal response from them Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: The City Council Members made brief announcements. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: Council Member Fonzi 1. City of Atascadero Design Review Committee — At their last meeting they reviewed an apartment building that is proposed for Amapoa. The applicant wanted to trim down the project to the bare bones, but the Committee held its own and she said the building will be very nice. Council Member Kelley 1. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC) — The Board held a discussion with representatives from high tech businesses in San Luis Obispo and Paso Robles who stated they have difficulty finding locations where they can increase their business size. Also, they would like more affordable housing for their employees. E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND / OR ACTION: None Atascadero City Council Draft Minutes of March 12,2013 Page 6 of 7 ITEM NUMBER: A- 3 DATE: 03/26/13 F. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor O'Malley adjourned the meeting at 9:21 p.m. MINUTES PREPARED BY: Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C. City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager The following exhibit is available for review in the City Clerk's office: Exhibit A— Photos from Don Ritter Atascadero City Council Draft Minutes of March 12,2013 Page 7 of 7 ITEM NUMBER: A- 4 DATE: 03/26/13 ranrr �rn pa *-.r Atascadero City Council Staff Report — Administrative Services Historic City Hall Project Bid Award: ACH-14 Audio-Video System RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Award the bid in the amount of $253,581.85 for the ACH-14 Audio-Video System installation for the Historic City Hall Project to Pro Sound CA, Inc.; and, 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with Pro Sound CA, Inc. in the amount of 253,581.85 for the ACH-14 Audio-Video System installation for the Historic City Hall Project; and, 3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder upon satisfactory completion of the project. DISCUSSION: Project. The process of renovating the Historic City Hall has required the building to be `de-constructed', essentially down to its exterior shell. This meant that all components of the previous audio-video system, such as the wiring, speakers, screen and projector, had to be completely removed from the upper rotunda space. These elements, once removed, were no longer usable. Fortunately, this gave staff the opportunity to design a state-of-the-art audio-video system for the new Council Chambers that will serve the City well into the future. The new AV system will greatly improve the viewing and listening capabilities for Council and the public. The new system will be fully digital, which means that both sound and video capabilities will be far superior to the conditions that Council is currently used to. This new system will also bring the City's broadcasting capabilities into compliance with FCC regulations. The new projector will be able to project in full daylight with superior color rendition, which results in more vibrant, color accurate presentations. The new projection screen will be the appropriate aspect ratio for the projector, and will be installed behind the dais. ITEM NUMBER: A- 4 DATE: 03/26/13 This positioning of the projector screen will allow Council and the public to maintain visual contact, without the distraction of turning to view a presentation. Council members will be able to see the images that appear on the projection screen displayed on individual monitors mounted on the dais, allowing them to focus their attention forward toward the public. The speaker lectern will be wireless, and can be located in front of the dais or on either side of the audience as needed. All audio-video functions will be easily controlled by a touch-screen monitor at a moveable desk, and the system will greatly simplify set up and take down for staff, as everything will be installed or will utilize wireless systems. The work involved in this contract will consist of all labor and material to install the new audio and video equipment in the building. This will also include manuals, warranties, user training and a year of maintenance services. Bid Award. This bid package was released for bidding on January 29, 2013. It was posted on the City's web site, in the Atascadero News, and in ten plan rooms. Seven contractors, of which only two were local, attended the mandatory pre-bid job walk- through that as held on February 12, 2013 at 1 :00 pm. Of those firms, only one chose to submit a bid. The bids were opened on March 6, 2013, at 2:00 pm. Pro Sound CA, out of North Hollywood, was the sole responsive bidder with a bid of$253,581.85. Contractor Package bid Pro Sound CA, Inc. $253,581.85 Although only one contractor submitted a bid, the bid price is in line with the consultant's estimate for the work. The majority of this work will fall under the "City Funded" category, meaning it will be funded with bond proceeds from the 2010 Bond Issue. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact of this award is $253,581.85 in budgeted City Hall Project Funds including funding from the 2010 bond issue. The current projected uses and sources of funds for the Project are as follows: ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 03/26/13 PROJECTED FUNDING USES Architecture and engineering $ 5,206,550 Construction costs: ACH-2 Penthouse Demolition and Hazardous Materials Abatement(final costs) 146,200 ACH-3 Basement Wall and Floor Demolition (final) 179,660 ACH-4 Basement Electrical Demolition and Temporary Power Installation (estimated final costs) 71,010 ACH-5 Foundation Structural Stabilization (final costs) 3,840,350 ACH-8 Historic Repair& Rehabilitation (bid+ change orders to date) 11,795,630 ACH-11 Structural Steel and Miscellaneous Metals (bid+change orders to date) 439,800 ACH-12 Rough Carpentry (bid+change orders to date) 324,250 ACH-14 Audio Visual System 253,582 ACH-15 Landscape/Hardscape 529,010 ACH-16 Elevator(bid+change orders to date) 277,120 ACH-17 Fire Protection(bid+change orders to date) 260,640 ACH-18 Plumbing (bid+change orders to date) 675,870 ACH-19 Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (bid+change orders to date) 850,480 ACH-20 Electrical (bid+change orders to date) 1,020,620 Minor Construction Contracts 362,790 Total construction costs 21,027,012 Construction management(contract and contract amendment) 3,642,000 General conditions, construction support, and permitting Deputy Inspection Services 390,496 Hazardous Materials Investigation & Monitoring 233,020 Permitting 281,760 Project Management 205,450 Other 153,330 Total testing, inspection, permitting and construction support 1,264,056 Contingency remaining 2,602,091 TOTAL PROJECTED FUNDING USES $33,741,709 PROJECTED FUNDING SOURCES Awarded FEMA/CaIEMA funding $15,982,955 Expected FEMA/CaIEMA funding 3,429,190 California Cultural Historic Endowment Grant 2,015,305 Redevelopment 2010 Bond Funds 13,000,000 Other Funding 334,230 TOTAL PROJECTED FUNDING SOURCES $34,761,680 FUNDING SURPLUS $ 1,019,971 ITEM NUMBER: A- 4 DATE: 03/26/13 Exhibit A ATTACHMENT: Exhibit A —ACH-14 Bid Summary ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 03/26/13 Exhibit A City of Atascadero Office of the City Clerk Bid Summary. TO: Public Works' FROM: Marcia Torgerson, City Clerk BID NO.: 2012-013 OPENED: 3/6/2013 HISTORIC CITY HALL PROJECT: AUDIO-VIDEO SYSTEM 1 Bids were received and openec TOTAL BASE BID Name of Biddcr AMOUNT PRO-SOUND CA INC $253,581.8 ITEM NUMBER: A - 5 DATE: 03/26/13 & a FA �T Atcascadero Citi Council Staff Report - Administrative Services Department February 2013 Accounts Payable and Payroll RECOMMENDATION: Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for February 2013. DISCUSSION: Attached for City Council review and approval are the following: Payroll Dated 2/14/13 Checks # 30152 - 30182 $ 19,311.70 Direct Deposits 239,023.47 Dated 2/28/13 Checks # 30183 - 30214 23 548 15 Direct Deposits 259,726.79 Accounts Payable Dated 2/1/13 - 2/28/13 Checks # 136124 - 136434 & EFTs 1233 - 1252 1,496,838.93 TOTAL AMOUNT $ 2,038,449.04 FISCAL IMPACT: Total expenditures for all funds is $ 2,038,449.04 CERTIFICATION: The undersigned certifies that the attached demands have been-released for p`yment and that funds are available for these demande---� s / Raclhelle ickard, Dire for of Administrative Services ATTACHMENT: February 2013 Eden Warrant Register in the amount of $ 1,496,838.93 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of February 2013 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 1233 02/01/2013 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Payroll Vendor Payment 874.61 1234 02/04/2013 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEI+ Payroll Vendor Payment 41,562.03 1235 02/04/2013 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEP Payroll Vendor Payment 56,429.93 1236 02/04/2013 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEA Payroll Vendor Payment 636.86 1237 02/04/2013 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 252.61 1238 02/04/2013 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTER Payroll Vendor Payment 56.59 136124 02/04/2013 ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN. Payroll Vendor Payment 760.00 136125 02/04/2013 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 9,053.47 136126 02/04/2013 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment 556.40 136127 02/04/2013 SEIU LOCAL 620 Payroll Vendor Payment 710.00 136128 02/04/2013 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 Payroll Vendor Payment 311.61 136129 02/04/2013 VANTAGEPOiNT TRNSFR AGT 304633 Payroll Vendor Payment 2,006.20 1239 02/05/2013 RABOBANK, N.A. Payroll Vendor Payment 41,739.98 1240 02/05/2013 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 10,154.68 1241 02/05/2013 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1,258.98 136130 02/08/2013 ATASCADERO TRAFFIC WAY STORAGE Accounts Payable Check 660.00 136131 02/08/2013 A&R CONSTRUCTION Accounts Payable Check 398.00 136132 02/08/2013 ACCESS PUBLISHING Accounts Payable Check 828.00 136133 02/08/2013 ADDICTION MEDICINE CONSULTANTS Accounts Payable Check 675.00 136134 02/08/2013 ADVANCED SEPTIC &SEWER SVC Accounts Payable Check 250.00 136135 02/08/2013 TREVOR R.AGUILAR Accounts Payable Check 135.00 136136 02/08/2013 ALLABOUT LEARNING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 624.00 136137 02/08/2013 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC Accounts Payable Check 314.00 136138 02/08/2013 AL'S SEPTIC PUMPING SVC, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,575.00 136139 02/08/2013 ALTHOUSE& MEADE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 135.00 136140 02/08/2013 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 29.17 136141 02/08/2013 AMERICAN MARBORG Accounts Payable Check 54.37 136142 02/08/2013 AMERICAN WEST TIRE&AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 2,618.71 136143 02/08/2013 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS Accounts Payable Check 142.75 136144 02/08/2013 ARTHURS CONTRACTING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 72,710.96 136145 02/08/2013 ASSC. OF ZOOS&AQUARIUMS Accounts Payable Check 95.00 136146 02/08/2013 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 84.00 136147 02/08/2013 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 15.69 136148 02/08/2013 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 766.18 136150 02/08/2013 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 3,107.60 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of February 2013 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 136151 02/08/2013 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 360.00 136152 02/08/2013 JAMES F. BACHMAN Accounts Payable Check 240.00 136153 02/08/2013 BASSETC'S CRICKET RANCH,INC. Accounts Payable Check 186.25 136154 02/08/2013 BERNARDS Accounts Payable Check 70,753.86 136155 02/08/2013 BERRY MAN, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,066.68 136156 02/08/2013 GREGORYA. BRAZZI Accounts Payable Check 120.00 136157 02/08/2013 JEFFREY A. BRAZZI Accounts Payable Check 60.00 136158 02/08/2013 SHIRLEY R. BRUTON Accounts Payable Check 222.00 136159 02/08/2013 BURKE,WILLIAMS, &SORENSON LLP Accounts Payable Check 15,897.07 136160 02/08/2013 BUTLER BUSINESS MACHINES Accounts Payable Check 357.68 136161 02/08/2013 CA CODE CHECK, INC. Accounts Payable Check 237.50 136162 02/08/2013 CA CONSERVATION CORP Accounts Payable Check 4,841.35 136163 02/08/2013 CALACT Accounts Payable Check 435.00 136164 02/08/2013 CAL-COAST INSIGNIA Accounts Payable Check 161.62 136165 02/08/2013 CALPORTLAND COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 906.94 136166 02/08/2013 KATE CAPELA Accounts Payable Check 48.71 136167 02/08/2013 JASON F. CARR Accounts Payable Check 179.00 136168 02108/2013 KATHLEEN J. GINOWALT Accounts Payable Check 273.00 136169 02/08/2013 CITY OF FRESNO-POLICE DEPT. Accounts Payable Check 330.00 136170 02/08/2013 COAST ELECTRONICS Accounts Payable Check 586.93 136171 02/08/2013 COLBY JACK CAFE&BAKERY, INC. Accounts Payable Check 250.13 136172 02/08/2013 GUY R. COOPER Accounts Payable Check 1,190.00 136173 02/08/2013 CORELOGIC INF. SOLUTIONS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 100.00 136174 02/08/2013 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 144.00 136175 02/08/2013 DAKOS LAND SURVEYS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 500.00 136176 02/08/2013 DANIEL A. DAVIS Accounts Payable Check 703.50 136177 02/08/2013 SANDRA N. DEAL PH.D. Accounts Payable Check 350.00 136178 02/08/2013 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY&FIRE Accounts Payable Check 1,355.76 136179 02/08/2013 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Accounts Payable Check 534.00 136180 02/08/2013 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Accounts Payable Check 1,860.91 136181 02/08/2013 DIAMONDBACK FIRE& RESCUE, INC Accounts Payable Check 315.01 136182 02/08/2013 DOCUTEAM Accounts Payable Check 366.47 136183 02/08/2013 JORDON T. DONOVAN Accounts Payable Check 44.00 136184 02/08/2013 EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC Accounts Payable Check 3,290.00 136185 02/08/2013 EL CAMINO CAR WASH LLC Accounts Payable Check 150.00 136186 02/08/2013 BRANDON S. ERICKSON Accounts Payable Check 48.00 136187 02/08/2013 EWING IRRIGATION GOLF INDUSTRL Accounts Payable Check 25.80 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of February 2013 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 136188 02/08/2013 FEDERAL EXPRESS Accounts Payable Check 59.40 136189 02/08/2013 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 891.00 136190 02/08/2013 FLUID RESOURCE MANAGEMENTJNC. Accounts Payable Check 896.00 136191 02/08/2013 FLYMEAT.COM Accounts Payable Check 107,90 136192 02/08/2013 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 196.76 136193 02/08/2013 WARREN FRACE Accounts Payable Check 300.00 136194 02/08/2013 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 2,422.13 136195 02/08/2013 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 808.85 136196 02/08/2013 GILBERT'S LANDSCAPES Accounts Payable Check 407.91 136197 02/08/2013 GOLDEN STATE COPIER& MAILING Accounts Payable Check 250.06 136198 02/08/2013 JASON C. GOOSSENS Accounts Payable Check 48.00 136199 02/08/2013 NATHAN 8, GOOSSENS Accounts Payable Check 117.00 136200 02/08/2013 BRADLEYA. HACKLEMAN Accounts Payable Check 1,063.35 136201 02/08/2013 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 450.89 136202 02/08/2013 HARVEY'S HONEYHUTS Accounts Payable Check 844,58 136203 02/08/2013 HELIXSTORM, INC. Accounts Payable Check 2,027.19 136204 02/08/2013 ETHAN L. HICKS Accounts Payable Check 44.00 136205 02/08/2013 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS Accounts Payable Check 907.70 136206 02/08/2013 INGLIS PET HOTEL Accounts Payable Check 146.54 136207 02/08/2013 INHOUSE SECURITY SERVICE, LLC Accounts Payable Check 555.00 136208 02/08/2013 CAROL D. JANSSEN Accounts Payable Check 558.00 136209 02/08/2013 JESPERSEN OLD SCHOOL TIRE&AU Accounts Payable Check 60.00 136210 02/08/2013 JIFFY LUBE Accounts Payable Check 172.78 136211 02/08/2013 JK'S UNLIMITED Accounts Payable Check 237.50 136212 02/08/2013 JOE A. GONSALVES&SON Accounts Payable Check 3,000.00 136213 02/08/2013 JOEL SWITZER DIESEL REPAIR,INC Accounts Payable Check 212.50 136214 02/08/2013 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 59.01 136215 02/08/2013 WILLIAM T. KNUCKLES Accounts Payable Check 60.00 136216 02/08/2013 KPRL 1230 AM Accounts Payable Check 320.00 136217 02/08/2013 LAYNE LABORATORIES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 453.22 136218 02/08/2013 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO. INC Accounts Payable Check 4,678.73 136219 02/08/2013 JAMES R. LEWIS Accounts Payable Check 169.67 136220 02/08/2013 ANDREW LUERA Accounts Payable Check 68.00 136221 02/08/2013 LYNN CARD COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 109.95 136222 02/08/2013 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 500.00 136223 02/08/2013 MEDWORKS MEDICAL CENTER Accounts Payable Check 100.00 136224 02/08/2013 MELIN ENTERPRISES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 200.00 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of February 2013 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 136225 02/08/2013 RILEY A. METE Accounts Payable Check 30.00 136226 02/08/2013 METROPOLITAN TRANSP COMM Accounts Payable Check 2,500.00 136227 42/08/2013 MICHAEL BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 24,275.00 136228 02/08/2013 MID-COAST GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 2,960,00 136229 02/08/2013 MID-STATE SOLID WASTE& RECYCG Accounts Payable Check 307.36 136230 02/08/2013 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 1,123.97 136231 02/08/2013 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 665.34 136232 02/08/2013 REON C MONSON Accounts Payable Check 318.00 136233 02/08/2013 PAUL NETZ Accounts Payable Check 191.00 136234 02/08/2013 NFPA Accounts Payable Check 165.00 136235 02/08/2013 NORTHERN ENERGY Accounts Payable Check 803.21 136236 02/08/2013 OAK COUNTRY LUMBER& RANCH Accounts Payable Check 145.13 136237 02/08/2013 RYAN J. O'CONNELL Accounts Payable Check 48.00 136238 02/08/2013 OFFICE DEPOT INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,527.81 136239 02/08/2013 ONTRAC Accounts Payable Check 5.35 136240 02/08/2013 O`REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 76.64 136241 02/08/2013 TARA ORLICK Accounts Payable Check 29.38 136242 02/08/2013 PACIFIC COAST GYMNASTICS CENTE Accounts Payable Check 304.50 136244 02/08/2413 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 18,668.21 136245 02/08/2013 PACIFIC HARVEST CATERING CO. Accounts Payable Check 407.06 136246 02/08/2013 PASO ROBLES FORD LINCOLN MERC Accounts Payable Check 639.08 136247 02/08/2013 CASEY J. PATTERSON Accounts Payable Check 455.00 136248 02/08/2013 PENFIELD & SMITH ENGINEERS INC Accounts Payable Check 3,448.75 136249 02/08/2013 PERFORMANCE SWEEPING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 600.00 136250 02/08/2013 MICHAEL G. PERRY Accounts Payable Check 40.00 136251 02/08/2013 PFEIFFER PARTNERS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 32,222.09 136252 02/08/2013 SCOTT E. PIPAN Accounts Payable Check 77.00 136253 02/08/2013 PLANT DOCTOR Accounts Payable Check 11,675.00 136254 02/08/2013 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION, INC. Accounts Payable Check 205.24 136255 02/08/2013 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY,INC. Accounts Payable Check 940.14 136256 02/08/2013 PRP COMPANIES Accounts Payable Check 307.00 136257 02/08/2013 JOHN RAMSEY Accounts Payable Check 20.00 136258 02/08/2013 RANGE MASTER Accounts Payable Check 476.17 136259 02/08/2013 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 43.03 136260 02/08/2013 RACHELLE RICKARD Accounts Payable Check 300.00 136261 02/08/2013 MICHELLE R. ROGERS Accounts Payable Check 504.00 136262 02/08/2013 SAFETY DRIVERS ED., LLC. Accounts Payable Check 102.90 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of February 2013 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 136263 02/08/2013 SAN DIEGO REG TRAINING CTR Accounts Payable Check 324.00 136264 02/08/2013 SCOTT OBRIEN FIRE&SAFETY CO Accounts Payable Check 799.27 136265 02/08/2013 JOHN C. SIEMENS Accounts Payable Check 56.00 136266 02/08/2013 SLO COUNTY SHERIFF Accounts Payable Check 86.00 136267 02/08/2013 DAVID L. SMAW Accounts Payable Check 120.00 136268 02/08/2013 SO CA TRAINING OFFICERS ASSC Accounts Payable Check 50.00 136269 02/08/2013 STAPLES&ASSOCIATES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 135.00 136270 02/08/2013 MICHAEL STORNETTA Accounts Payable Check 200.00 136271 02/08/2013 STRIKER MEDIA GROUP, INC, Accounts Payable Check 875.00 136272 02/08/2013 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO COMM. Accounts Payable Check 31,133.00 136273 02/08/2013 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1,722.00 136274 02/08/2013 CALLIE TAYLOR Accounts Payable Check 10.00 136275 02/08/2013 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS Accounts Payable Check 139.63 136276 02/08/2013 BUSS THOMPSON Accounts Payable Check 300.00 136277 02/08/2013 THE TOP SHOP UPHOLSTERY Accounts Payable Check 819.12 136278 02/08/2013 HSIAO-CHING TRENBETH Accounts Payable Check 22,290.00 136279 02/08/2013 UNION BANK, N.A. Accounts Payable Check 2,947.00 136280 02/08/2013 UNITED STAFFING ASSOCIATES,LLC Accounts Payable Check 1,584.00 136281 02/08/2013 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check 807.21 136282 02/08/2013 BRIDGET M. VAN BEEK Accounts Payable Check 96.00 136283 02/08/2013 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 412.37 136284 02/08/2013 GARRETT M. VILLA Accounts Payable Check 30.00 136285 02/08/2013 BRANDON J.WELLS Accounts Payable Check 88.00 136286 02/08/2013 WULFING'S BACKGROUND& POLYGR Accounts Payable Check 1,000.00 136287 02/08/2013 KAREN B.WYKE Accounts Payable Check 717.00 136288 02/08/2013 PAUL JEFFREY ZEHNER Accounts Payable Check 790.00 136300 02/14/2013 CHEVRON &TEXACO BUS. CARD Accounts Payable Check 778.64 136301 02/14/2013 SHELL Accounts Payable Check 647.00 136302 02/14/2013 WEX BANK-76 UNIVERSL Accounts Payable Check 11,903.36 1242 02/15/2013 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Payroll Vendor Payment 874.61 1243 02/15/2013 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEft Payroll Vendor Payment 42,537.82 1244 02/15/2013 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTED Payroll Vendor Payment 58,288.06 1245 02/15/2013 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEf Payroll Vendor Payment 636.86 1246 02/15/2013 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEP Payroll Vendor Payment 8.29 1247 02/15/2013 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEP Payroll Vendor Payment 504.29 1248 02/15/2013 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEP Payroll Vendor Payment 393.64 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of February 2013 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 136289 02/15/2013 ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN. Payroll Vendor Payment 760.00 136290 02/15/2013 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 50.00 136291 02/15/2013 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS Payroll Vendor Payment 1,301.75 136292 02/15/2013 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00 136293 02/15/2013 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC. Payroll Vendor Payment 2,567.32 136294 02/15/2013 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 9,053.47 136295 02/15/2013 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment 552.86 136296 02/15/2013 SEIU LOCAL 620 Payroll Vendor Payment 733.03 136297 02/15/2013 SLO COUNTY SHERIFF Payroll Vendor Payment 640.97 136298 02/15/2013 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 Payroll Vendor Payment 311.61 136299 02/15/2013 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 Payroll Vendor Payment 2,006.20 1249 02/19/2013 RABOBANK, N.A. Payroll Vendor Payment 42,122.29 1250 02/19/2013 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 10,084.23 1251 02/19/2013 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1,319.83 136303 02/20/2013 PICKARD&BUTTERS CONST., INC. Accounts Payable Check 181,720.53 136304 02/20/2013 ALLSTATE WORKPLACE DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 3,201.07 136306 02/20/2013 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA Payroll Vendor Payment 103,069.00 136307 02/20/2013 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS CO Payroll Vendor Payment 866.97 136308 02/20/2013 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES Payroll Vendor Payment 1,645.53 136309 02/20/2013 PREFERRED BENEFITS INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 9,611.73 1252 02/22/2013 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON Accounts Payable Check 267,917.50 136310 02/22/2013 MATTHEW R.AANERUD Accounts Payable Check 400.00 136311 02/22/2013 AGP VIDEO, INC. Accounts Payable Check 3,367.50 136312 02/22/2013 TREVOR R.AGUILAR Accounts Payable Check 60.00 136313 02/22/2013 AIR-RITE REFRIGERATION Accounts Payable Check 4,332.00 136314 02/22/2013 JOE ALLEN Accounts Payable Check 281.00 136315 02/22/2013 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC Accounts Payable Check 173.00 136316 02/22/2013 AMERICAN WEST TIRE&AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 3,937,39 136317 02/22/2013 AMI PIPE& SUPPLY, INC. Accounts Payable Check 2,712.72 136318 02/22/2013 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 746.50 136319 02/22/2013 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 809.91 136320 02/22/2013 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 1,112.40 136321 02/22/2013 AUDREY BANKS Accounts Payable Check 367.59 136322 02/22/2013 BATTERY SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 93.28 136323 02/22/2013 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC Accounts Payable Check 196.10 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of February 2013 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 136324 02/22/2013 ALEX J. BRAZZI Accounts Payable Check 52.00 136325 02/22/2013 GREGORY A. BRAZZI Accounts Payable Check 135.00 136326 02/22/2013 JEFFREY A. BRAZZI Accounts Payable Check 135.00 136327 02/22/2013 TERRY BUCKLEY Accounts Payable Check 78.84 136328 02/22/2013 BUTLER BUSINESS MACHINES Accounts Payable Check 319.75 136329 02/22/2013 CA ASC FOR LOCAL ECONOMIC DEV Accounts Payable Check 465.00 136330 02/22/2013 CA CODE CHECK, INC. Accounts Payable Check 2,645.83 136331 02/22/2013 CCC-ICC Accounts Payable Check 90.00 136332 02/22/2013 CED CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL Accounts Payable Check 4,972.11 136333 02/22/2013 CERTIF-A-GIFT COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 197.26 136334 02/22/2013 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS Accounts Payable Check 962.45 136335 02/22/2013 CO OF SAN LUIS OBISPO SART PRG Accounts Payable Check 1,383.00 136336 02/22/2013 COAST ELECTRONICS Accounts Payable Check 4,977.93 136337 02/22/2013 COASTAL REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 408.89 136338 02/22/2013 CORELOGIC INF, SOLUTIONS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 100.00 136339 02/22/2013 CREDIT BUREAU OF SLO &SB CO. Accounts Payable Check 40.00 136340 02/22/2013 CULLIGAN/CENTRAL COAST WTR TRT Accounts Payable Check 70.00 136341 02/22/2013 DAN BIDDLE PEST CONTROL SERVIC Accounts Payable Check 130.00 136342 02/22/2013 SANDRA N. DEAL PH.D. Accounts Payable Check 350.00 136343 02/22/2013 DIGITAL MARKETING ZONE Accounts Payable Check 69.71 136344 02/22/2013 DISH Accounts Payable Check 104.00 136345 02/22/2013 DOCUTEAM Accounts Payable Check 106.22 136346 02/22/2013 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES INC Accounts Payable Check 1,945.38 136347 02/22/2013 EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC Accounts Payable Check 4,359.00 136348 02/22/2013 EIKHOF DESIGN GROUP, INC. Accounts Payable Check 840.00 136349 02/22/2013 BRANDON S. ERICKSON Accounts Payable Check 48.00 136350 02/22/2013 ESCUELA DEL RIO Accounts Payable Check 80.00 136351 02/22/2013 FEDERAL EXPRESS Accounts Payable Check 6.24 136352 02/22/2013 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 320.23 136353 02/22/2013 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 471.73 136354 02/22/2013 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL Accounts Payable Check 72.00 136355 02/22/2013 FIRST TRANSIT, INC. Accounts Payable Check 20,168.12 136356 02/22/2013 FLUID RESOURCE MANAGEMENT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 6,83924 136357 02/22/2013 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 783.67 136358 02/22/2013 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 75.18 136359 02/22/2013 JOHN GIBBS Accounts Payable Check 20.00 136360 02/22/2013 JASON C. GOOSSENS Accounts Payable Check 96.00 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of February 2013 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 136361 02/22/2013 NATHAN B. GOOSSENS Accounts Payable Check 117.00 136362 02/22/2013 GSA- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Accounts Payable Check 585.97 136363 02/22/2013 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 40022 136364 02/22/2013 HARVEY'S HONEYHUTS Accounts Payable Check 844.60 136365 02/22/2013 ETHAN L. HICKS Accounts Payable Check 44.00 136366 02/22/2013 JOHN HOLLOWAY Accounts Payable Check 20.00 136367 02/22/2013 INGLIS PET HOTEL Accounts Payable Check 354.19 136368 02/22/2013 EVELYN R. INGRAM Accounts Payable Check 830.68 136369 02/22/2013 INSITECIVIL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 950.00 136370 02/22/2013 INTERSPIRO, INC. Accounts Payable Check 42.63 136371 02/22/2013 J. CARROLL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 148.39 136372 02/22/2013 JK'S UNLIMITED Accounts Payable Check 1,477.65 136373 02/22/2013 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 961.62 136374 02/22/2013 WILLIAM T. KNUCKLES Accounts Payable Check 135.00 136375 02/22/2013 KPRL 1230 AM Accounts Payable Check 320.00 136376 02/22/2013 LANDSCAPES BY STACH Accounts Payable Check 250.00 136377 02/22/2013 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO. INC Accounts Payable Check 1,428.00 136378 02/22/2013 ZACHARIAH M. LINDSAY Accounts Payable Check 104.00 136379 02/22/2013 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 453.78 136380 02/22/2013 MEDWORKS MEDICAL CENTER Accounts Payable Check 95.00 136381 02/22/2013 MICHAEL FREDERICK PAVING,INC. Accounts Payable Check 4,949.19 136382 02/22/2013 MID-COAST GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 490.00 136383 02/22/2013 MID-STATE SOLID WASTE& RECYCG Accounts Payable Check 757.58 136384 02/22/2013 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 432.90 136385 02/22/2013 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 178.72 136386 02/22/2013 HEATHER MORENO Accounts Payable Check 46.33 136387 02/22/2013 NORTH COAST ENGINEERING INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,327.50 136388 02/22/2013 OFFICE DEPOT INC. Accounts Payable Check 793.84 136389 02/22/2013 THOMAS P. O'MALLEY Accounts Payable Check 92.68 136390 02/22/2013 ONTRAC Accounts Payable Check 5.35 136391 02/22/2013 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 16,995.25 136392 02/22/2013 PACIFIC HARVEST CATERING CO. Accounts Payable Check 300.00 136393 02/22/2013 PASO ROBLES FORD LINCOLN MERC Accounts Payable Check 13.10 136394 02/22/2013 PC MALL GOV Accounts Payable Check 62.34 136395 02/22/2013 MICHAEL G. PERRY Accounts Payable Check 40.00 136396 02/22/2013 PFEIFFER PARTNERS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 36,759.50 136397 02/22/2013 FRED PFLUM Accounts Payable Check 312.98 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of February 2013 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 136398 02/22/2013 PHONE SUPPLEMENTS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 4,522.77 136399 02/22/2013 TAMMI POMI Accounts Payable Check 20.00 136400 02/22/2013 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY,INC, Accounts Payable Check 122.87 136401 02/22/2013 PVP COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,568.54 136402 02/22/2013 JOE A. RAMIREZ Accounts Payable Check 227.90 136403 02/22/2013 RANGE MASTER Accounts Payable Check 223.51 136404 02/22/2013 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 758.59 136405 02/22/2013 KARA ROWLETT Accounts Payable Check 403.58 136406 02/22/2013 SANTA MARIA TIRE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 631.85 136407 02/22/2013 MICHELE SCHAMBER Accounts Payable Check 77.00 136408 02/22/2013 SCHIMM'S TREE SERVICE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 600.00 136409 02/22/2013 SLO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE Accounts Payable Check 4,752.13 136410 02/22/2013 SLO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE Accounts Payable Check 43.00 136411 02/22/2013 DAVID L. SMAW Accounts Payable Check 60.00 136412 02/22/2013 SOUTH COAST EMERGENCY VEH SVC Accounts Payable Check 678.90 136413 02/22/2013 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY Accounts Payable Check 984.42 136414 02/22/2013 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN Accounts Payable Check 1,191.00 136415 02/22/2013 STATEWIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY&SIGNS Accounts Payable Check 355.50 136416 02/22/2013 LORI STERMER Accounts Payable Check 70.00 136417 02/22/2013 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1,057.50 136418 02/22/2013 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS Accounts Payable Check 220.27 136419 02/22/2013 THOMA ELECTRIC, INC. Accounts Payable Check 360.00 136420 02/22/2013 MARCIATORGERSON Accounts Payable Check 102.72 136421 02/22/2013 TRACY AVIARY Accounts Payable Check 100.00 136422 02/22/2013 TW TELECOM, INC. Accounts Payable Check 9.59 136425 02/22/2013 U.S. BANK Accounts Payable Check 13,822.63 136426 02/22/2013 ULTREX BUSINESS PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 7.00 136427 02/22/2013 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00 136428 02/22/2013 UNITED STAFFING ASSOCIATES,LLC Accounts Payable Check 1,584.00 136429 02/22/2013 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 1,237.06 136430 02/22/2013 GAR RETT M. VILLA Accounts Payable Check 40.00 136431 02/22/2013 NANCY E.WEBBER, PH.D. Accounts Payable Check 450.00 136432 02/22/2013 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 54.94 136433 02/22/2013 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 533.20 136434 02/22/2013 ZOO MED LABORATORIES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 518.71 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of February 2013 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount $ 1,496,838.93 ITEM NUMBER: A- 6 DATE: 03/26/13 Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Community Development Department Title 9 Planning and Zoning Text Amendments PLN 2012-1444 / ZCH 2012-0167 (City of Atascadero) RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt on second reading, by title only, the Draft Ordinance, to approve PLN 2012-1444 (Zone Text Change ZCH 2012-0167). DISCUSSION: This action consists of proposed Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment to the Title 9 Planning and Zoning Code. The proposed text amendment consists of a revision to Section 9-3.13, to allow Indoor Recreation as a conditionally allowable use within the Industrial Zoning District. Requests have been made from industrial property owners and business tenants in regards to utilizing existing buildings along Traffic Way for indoor recreation uses such as gyms. On January 15, 2013, the Planning Commission recommended for approval a zone text change allowing indoor recreation as a conditional use within the Industrial Zoning District. On March 12, 2013, the City Council held a hearing on the proposed zone text change and reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendation. The City Council approved the Planning Commission's recommendation and introduced for first reading by title only, the proposed Draft Ordinance. This Ordinance is being returned to the City Council to be adopted on second reading by title only. If adopted, the Ordinance will become effective on April 25, 2013. ITEM NUMBER: A- 6 DATE: 03/26/13 FISCAL IMPACT: There are no known fiscal impacts to the City at this time. Additional permit and business license revenue may be derived by applicants wishing to open new indoor recreational business here in the City. ATTACHMENT: Draft Ordinance A ITEM NUMBER: A- 6 DATE: 03/26/13 ATTACHMENT: Draft Ordinance A DRAFT ORDINANCE A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE TEXT CHANGE 2012-0167 AMENDING THE ASTASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE PLN 2012-1244 / ZCH 2012-0167 (Citywide/City of Atascadero) The City Council hereby finds and declares as follows: WHEREAS, an application has been received from the City of Atascadero (6907 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422), to consider Zone Change Text Amendments to conditionally allow indoor recreational uses in the Industrial (I) Zoning Districts; and, WHEREAS, the project is consistent with the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the City's General Plan, adopted in June 2002, whereby the EIR assessed impacts associated with"lower intensity businesses" in the Industrial land use designated areas; and, WHEREAS, a Notice of Exemption was prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enact this amendment to Title 9 Planning and Zoning of the Municipal Code; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone Text Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Zoning Text Amendments; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a Public Hearing held on January 15, 2013, studied and considered Zone Change 2012-0167, and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on March 12, 2013 studied and considered Zone Change 2012-0167; and, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: ITEM NUMBER: A- 6 DATE: 03/26/13 SECTION 1. Findings for Approval of a Zone Text Change. The City Council finds as follows: 1. The Planning and Zoning Text Change is consistent with General Plan policies and all other applicable ordinances and policies of the City. 2. This Amendment of the Zoning Ordinance will provide for the orderly and efficient use of lands where such development standards are applicable. 3. The Text Change will not, in itself, result in significant environmental impacts. SECTION 2. Approval. The City Council of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on March 12, 2013 resolved to introduce for first reading by title only, an ordinance that would amend the City Zoning code text as follows: Article 18. I (Industrial) Zone 9-3.311 Purpose. This zone is established to provide suitable locations for heavy manufacturing and industrial uses within the City. (Ord. 364 § 2 (part), Exh. B (part), 1999: Ord. 68 § 9- 3.311, 1983) 3.312 Allowable uses. The following uses shall be allowed in the Industrial Zone. The establishment of allowable uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2.108 (Plot plan) and Section 9-2.109 (Precise plan): (a)All uses listed as allowable uses in the IP (Industrial Park) Zone; (b)Agricultural processing; (c) Lumber and wood products; (d) Concrete, gypsum and plaster products; (e) Glass products manufacturing; (f) Paper products; (g) Paving materials; (h) Structural clay pottery products; (i) Machinery manufacturing; 0) Sexually oriented businesses (see Chapter 5-10). (Ord. 364 § 2 (part), Exh. B (part), 1999: Ord. 300 § 2 (5), 1996; Ord. 68 § 9-3.312, 1983) 9-3.313 Conditional uses. The following uses may be allowed in the Industrial Zone. The establishment of conditional uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2.110 (Conditional use permits): (a) Chemical products; ITEM NUMBER: A- 6 DATE: 03/26/13 (b) Caretaker's residence (see Section 9-6.104); (c) Petroleum refining and related products; (d) Textile mill; (e) Metal industries—Primary; (f)Pipelines; (g) Recycling and scrap (see Section 9-6.131); (h) School—Business and vocational (see Section 9-6.125); (i) Transit stations and terminals; 0)Vehicle and freight terminals; (k) Plastic and rubber products; (1)Recycling centers (see Section 9-6.132); (m)Utility service centers; (n) Sales lots (see Section 9-6.139). (o) Indoor Recreation (Ord. 499 § 2 (part), 2006: Ord. 364 § 2 (part), Exh. B (part), 1999: Ord. 237 § 1 (D)(part), 1992; Ord. 68 § 9-3.313, 1983) 9-3.314 Lot size. There shall be no minimum lot size in the Industrial Zone. (Ord. 364 § 2 (part), Exh. B (part), 1999: Ord. 68 § 9-3.314, 1983) SECTION 3. A summary of this ordinance, approved by the City Attorney, together with the ayes and noes, shall be published twice: at least five days prior to its final passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper published and circulated in the City of Atascadero, and; before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its final passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper published and circulated in the City of Atascadero. A copy of the full text of this ordinance shall be on file in the City Clerk's office on and after the date following introduction and passage and shall be available to any interested member of the public. ITEM NUMBER: A- 6 DATE: 03/26/13 INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on March 12, 2013, and PASSED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero, State of California, on by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: Tom O'Malley, Mayor ATTEST: Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney ITEM NUMBER: A- 7 DATE: 03/26/13 OR Atascadero City Council Staff Report — City Manager's Office Establishment of the Atascadero Tourism Business Improvement District (ATBID) RECOMMENDATIONS: Council: 1. Adopt the Draft Resolution declaring the intention to establish the Atascadero Tourism Business Improvement District; and, 2. Set April 9, 2013 as the date of the public hearing on the establishment of the proposed ATBID and the levy of assessments. DISCUSSION: The lodging businesses in Atascadero have requested the establishment of the "Atascadero Tourism Business Improvement District" in order to levy annual assessments under the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989. The activities to be funded by the proposed levy of assessments against lodging businesses within the ATBID are tourism promotions and marketing programs to promote the City as a tourism destination. The ATBID assessment will be equal to two percent (2%) of the rent charged by the business per occupied room or space per night for all transient occupancies in lodging businesses. Atascadero currently has an existing Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) of ten percent (10%) of the rent charged to transients that stay at lodging businesses, defined as "hotels" in Title 3, Section 3.02 of the municipal code. The ATBID definitions parallel those for the TOT. ATBID assessments will be collected at the same time and in the same manner as the TOT. ITEM NUMBER: A- 7 DATE: 03/26/13 ALTERNATIVES: Do not approve the establishment of the Atascadero Tourism Business Improvement District. FISCAL IMPACT: None for this action. There will be ongoing costs of administration of the ATBID, which will be partially covered by a 1% administration fee charged against the assessments. ATTACHMENT: Draft Resolution declaring the intention to establish the Atascadero Tourism and Business Improvement District ITEM NUMBER: A- 7 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ESTABLISH THE ATASCADERO TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ATBID), DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AN ASSESSMENT ON LODGING BUSINESSES WITHIN SUCH DISTRICT, AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE OF A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE FORMATION OF THE DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City Atascadero ("City") is authorized under The Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989, California Streets and Highways Code section 36500 and following ("BID Law"), to establish a business improvement district and to impose assessments and charges on businesses within such area and use such proceeds to promote tourism for the benefit of designated businesses; and, WHEREAS, representatives of hotels, motels, bed and breakfasts, and similar lodging businesses have undertaken an effort to promote and develop such an area and have requested that the City establish a business improvement district for promoting tourism in the City to be known as the "Atascadero Tourism Business Improvement District" or"ATBID;" and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that establishing the ATBID will provide a useful mechanism to fund tourism promotions, which will benefit the City's lodging businesses and further the public welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO: SECTION 1. Intent to Form ATBID. The City Council hereby declares it intention to establish the Atascadero Tourism Business Improvement District (ATBID) pursuant to the BID Law. SECTION 2. Affected Businesses and Boundaries. The ATBID is proposed to include all of the lodging businesses, including hotels, motels, bed and breakfasts, and each business defined as a "hotel" in Section 3-3.02 of Chapter 3 (Transient Occupancy Tax) of the Atascadero Municipal Code ("Lodging Businesses")within the corporate boundaries of the City. SECTION 3. Activities to be Funded. The activities to be funded by the proposed levy of assessments against Lodging Businesses within the ATBID are tourism promotions and marketing programs to promote the City as a tourism destination, and projects, programs, and activities that benefit Lodging Businesses located and operating within the boundaries of the ITEM NUMBER: A- 7 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment ATBID. The proposed activities will primarily be targeted at increasing transient stays at Lodging Businesses. SECTION 4. Proposed Method and Basis of Levying Assessments, and Timing of Payments. A. Assessment. Each Lodging Business will collect and remit to the City an ATBID assessment equal to two percent (2%) of the rent charged by the Business per occupied room or space per night for all transient occupancies. B. New Lodging Business Subject to Assessment. Any new Lodging Businesses established within the boundaries of the ATBID subsequent to its establishment will be required to collect and remit the applicable ATBID assessment. C. Exemptions. No assessment will be imposed on a Lodging Business for any rent by a transient who is exempt by law from paying any transient occupancy taxes under Chapter 3 (Transient Occupancy Tax) of the Atascadero Municipal Code. D. Extended Stays. No assessments will be imposed on any Lodging Business for any rent by a person who is not deemed a "transient" when such person's stay is longer than 30 consecutive calendar days pursuant to Chapter 3 (Transient Occupancy Tax) of the Atascadero Municipal Code. E. Payment of Assessments. The assessment will be paid at the time the Lodging Business remits its transient occupancy taxes to the City. The assessments will not be included in gross room rental revenue for the purpose of determining the amount of transient occupancy taxes. F. Payment Prerequisite to Business License and Penalties and Procedures for Unpaid Assessments. 1. No business license or tax certificate will be issued under Chapter 5 of the Atascadero Municipal Code unless the ATBID assessment payment is current. 2. Penalties and interest will be assessed upon any unpaid assessment in the manner specified in Section 3-3.08 of the Atascadero Municipal Code until such time as the current assessment is paid in full; provided, however, that if there is concurrently a delinquency of the transient occupancy tax as well as the assessment, a single penalty of$200 will be imposed under Section 3-3.08(a) in addition to the 10%penalty on the amount of the unpaid assessment. G. City Administrative Fee. City will retain one percent (1%) of the collected assessments for its administrative fees and costs. SECTION 5. Public Hearing on Proposed ATBID. The City Council sets April 9, 2013 as the date of the public hearing on the establishment of the proposed ATBID and the levy ITEM NUMBER: A- 7 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment of assessments. The public hearing will be held at 6:00 .mm. or as soon thereafter as practicable, in the City of Atascadero Council Chambers, 6907 El Camino Real, Atascadero, California 93422. SECTION 6. Protest Procedures. A. At the public hearing, the testimony of all interested persons for or against the establishment of the ATBID, the extent of the ATBID, and the specified types of tourism promotion activities will be heard. A protest may be made orally or in writing by any owner of a Lodging Business that will be within the ATBID boundaries and subject to the ATBID assessment. B. Any protest pertaining to the regularity or sufficiency of the proceedings must be in writing and clearly state the irregularity or defect to which the objection is made. C. Written protests must be received by the City Clerk, City of Atascadero, before the close of the public hearing and may be delivered or mailed to the City Clark, Atascadero, 6907 El Camino Real, Atascadero, California 93422. A written protest may be withdrawn in writing at any time before the conclusion of the public hearing. D. Each written protest must contain a written description of the Lodging Business in which the person signing the protest is interested sufficiently to identify the business. If the person signing the protest is not shown on the official records of the City of Atascadero as the owner of the business, then the protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that the person is the owner of the business. E. A written protest that does not comply with this section will not be counted in determining a majority protest. F. At the conclusion of the public hearing, if protests are received from the owners of Lodging Businesses in the proposed ATBID which will pay 50% or more of the assessments proposed to be levied and protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protest to less than 50% (i.e., there is a majority protest), no further proceedings to create the ATBID, as contained in this resolution of intention, will be taken for a period of one year from the date of the finding of a majority protest by the City Council. If the majority protest is only against specified types of activities within the ATBID, those types of activities will be eliminated. SECTION 7. Further Information. Further information regarding the proposed ATBID may be obtained from the City Manager's Office, City of Atascadero, 6907 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422. SECTION 8. Notice of Hearing. The City Clerk is directed to provide notice of the public hearing on the proposed ATBID in accordance with the BID Law. ITEM NUMBER: A- 7 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment SECTION 9. Effective Date. This resolution will take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council. On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: Tom O'Malley, Mayor ATTEST: Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney ITEM NUMBER: A- 8 DATE: 03/26/13 ii nAp' iiia' X79'x7 CAD_- _;sem moi Atascadero City Council Staff Report — Public Works Department Agreement with Caltrans for Project Study Report (PSR-PDS) for the Del Rio Road Freeway Interchange Project RECOMMENDATION: Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Caltrans for review of engineering and environmental studies for required planning and design approval of the Del Rio Road Freeway Interchange for an amount not to exceed $104,000. DISCUSSION: The City has retained qualified consultants to prepare the Caltrans required Project Study Report (PSR-PDS) for the Del Rio Road Freeway Interchange Project. The interchange improvements required as mitigations for the Del Rio Specific Plan Area are to be located within the Highway 101 right-of-way and require an extensive review and approval process through Caltrans. Caltrans requires an agreement with the City so that they are reimbursed for their staff time involved with this review and approval process. Based on initial meetings with Caltrans District 5 staff, and review of the Del Rio Road Interchange Improvement Project, the attached "Cooperative Agreement" has been developed. The standard Caltrans agreement establishes the roles of each party, reimbursement to Caltrans of staff time expended on the project, the timeframe in which Caltrans has to respond to documents submitted to them by the City, responsibilities of each party related to hazardous materials, indemnity, prevailing wage, and other issues such as termination of the agreement. FISCAL IMPACT: Council has previously directed staff to proceed with the Del Rio Freeway Interchange Improvement Project. This action will result in the expenditure of up to $104,000 over an estimated two-year period in budgeted Circulation Impact Fees funds. These Circulation Impact Fees are collected for circulation system capital projects identified in ITEM NUMBER: A- 8 DATE: 03/26/13 the latest Development Impact Fee analysis, as well as part of the Fair Share Mitigation Fees conditioned on the Walmart and Annex project approvals. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Council may reject staff's recommendation and direct staff to renegotiate the terms of the agreement. ATTACHMENT: Exhibit A — Proposed Cooperative Agreement ITEM NUMBER: A- 8 DATE: 03/26/13 Exhibit A EXHIBIT A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT Project Study Report— Project Development Support (PSR-PDS) This Agreement, effective on , is between the State of California, acting through its Department of Transportation, referred to as CALTRANS, and: City of Atascadero, a body politic and municipal corporation or chartered city of the State of California, referred to hereinafter as CITY. RECITALS 1. PARTNERS are authorized to enter into a cooperative agreement for improvements to the state highway system (SHS)per the California Streets and Highways Code sections 114 and 130. 2. CITY desires that a project initiation document (PID) is developed for operational improvements to the Highway 101/Del Rio Road Interchange within the SHS and is referred to herein as PROJECT. 3. PARTNERS acknowledge that this Agreement is only applicable for a Project Study Report-Project Development Support (PSR-PDS) PID. 4. California Government Code section 65086.5 authorizes CALTRANS to perform as reimbursed work: (i) Preparation of PIDs at the request of local agencies. (ii) Review and approval of PIDs developed by others. 5. CITY is willing to develop the PID and is willing to fund one hundred percent(100%) of the PID's costs and fees, including costs to reimburse CALTRANS. If, in the future, CALTRANS is allocated state funds and Personnel Years (PYs) for PID review of this PROJECT, CALTRANS will agree to amend this Agreement to change the reimbursement arrangement for PID review. CALTRANS will review and approve the PID prepared by CITY; will provide relevant proprietary information in the form of existing data dumps, spreadsheets, and maps and will actively participate in the project delivery team(PDT)meetings, and will complete any work elements identified in the SCOPE SUMMARY of this Agreement. All CALTRANS' activities will be done as reimbursed work. 6. PARTNERS hereby set forth the terms, covenants, and conditions of this Agreement,under which they will complete the PID. ITEM NUMBER: A- 8 DATE: 03/26/13 Exhibit A ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 7. CITY will prepare a PID for PROJECT at its sole cost and expense and at no cost to CALTRANS. The PID shall be signed on behalf of CITY by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California. 8. CALTRANS will complete the work elements that are assigned to it on the SCOPE SUMMARY which is attached to and made a part of this Agreement by reference. CITY will complete the work elements assigned to it on the SCOPE SUMMARY. Work elements marked with "N/A" on the SCOPE SUMMARY are not included within this Agreement. Work elements are outlined in the Workplan Standards Guide for the Delivery of Capital Projects available at www.dot.ca. og v/hq//rojmgmt/guidance.htm. 9. CALTRANS will complete a review of the draft PID and provide its comments to CITY within 60 calendar days from the date CALTRANS received the draft PID from CITY. CITY will address the comments provided by CALTRANS. If any interim reviews are requested of CALTRANS by CITY, CALTRANS will complete those reviews within 30 calendar days from the date CALTRANS received the draft PID from CITY. 10. After CITY revises the PID to address all of CALTRANS' comments and submits the PID and all related attachments and appendices, CALTRANS will complete its review and final determination of the PID within 30 calendar days from the date CALTRANS received the draft PID from CITY. Should CALTRANS require supporting data necessary to defend facts or claims cited in the PID, CITY will provide all available supporting data in a reasonable time so that CALTRANS may conclude its review. The 30 day CALTRANS review period will be stalled during that time and will continue to run after CITY provides the required data. 11. CALTRANS will perform its review and approval in accordance with the provision of the current Project Development Procedures Manual. CALTRANS' review and approval will consist of performing independent quality assurance (IQA)to verify that quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA)meets department standards and determination that the work is acceptable for the next project component. However, CALTRANS' review and approval does not involve any work necessary to actually develop or complete the PID. No liability will be assignable to CALTRANS, its officers and employees by CITY under the terms of this Agreement or by third parties by reason of CALTRANS' review and approval of the PID. 12. PID preparation, except as set forth in this Agreement, is to be performed by CITY. Should CITY request CALTRANS to perform any portion of PID preparation work, except as otherwise set forth in this Agreement, CITY shall first agree to reimburse CALTRANS for such work and PARTNERS will amend this Agreement. ITEM NUMBER: A- 8 DATE: 03/26/13 Exhibit A INVOICE AND PAYMENT 13. CITY agrees to pay CALTRANS, an amount not to exceed $104,000. 14. CALTRANS will draw from any CALTRANS administered state and/or federal funds that CITY has committed to CALTRANS for this PROJECT. 15. CALTRANS will invoice CITY for a $26,000 initial deposit after execution of this Agreement and thirty(30)working days prior to the commencement of PROJECT expenditures. 16. Thereafter, CALTRANS will submit to CITY monthly invoices for estimated monthly costs based on the prior month's expenditures. 17. After PARTNERS agree that all work is complete for the PROJECT, CALTRANS will submit a final accounting for all costs. Based on the final accounting, CALTRANS will refund or invoice as necessary in order to satisfy the financial commitments of this Agreement. 18. If an executed Program Supplement Agreement (PSA) or STIP Planning, Programming, and Monitoring Program Fund Transfer Agreement (PPM) exists for this PROJECT then CITY will abide by the billing and payment conditions detailed for the fund types identified in the PSA or PPM. 19. If CITY has received Electronic Funds Transfer(EFT) certification from CALTRANS then CITY will use the EFT mechanism and follow all EFT procedures to pay all invoices issued from CALTRANS. 20. If CALTRANS reimburses CITY for any costs later determined to be unallowable, CITY will reimburse those funds. 21. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, PARTNERS will pay invoices within 30 calendar days of receipt of invoice. GENERAL CONDITIONS 22. Per Chapter 603, amending item 2660-001-0042 of Section 2.00 of the State Budget Act of 2012, the cost of any engineering services performed by CALTRANS towards any local government agency-sponsored PID project will only include direct costs. Indirect or overhead costs will not be applied during the development of the PID document. 23. The PID shall be prepared in accordance with all State and Federal laws, regulations, policies,procedures, and standards that CALTRANS would normally follow if CALTRANS was to prepare the PID. ITEM NUMBER: A- 8 DATE: 03/26/13 Exhibit A 24. PARTNERS will not incur costs beyond the funding commitments established in this Agreement. 25. If HM-I or HM-2 is found within the PROJECT limits, CITY will immediately notify CALTRANS. 26. CITY, independent of PROJECT, is responsible for any HM-1 found within PROJECT limits and outside the existing SHS right of way. CITY will undertake or cause to be undertaken HM MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES related to HM-1 with minimum impact to PROJECT schedule. 27. PARTNERS agree to consider alternatives to PROJECT scope and/or alignment, to the extent practicable, in an effort to avoid any known hazardous materials within the proposed PROJECT limits. 28. CALTRANS' acquisition or acceptance of title to any property on which any HM-1 or HM-2 is found will proceed in accordance with CALTRANS' policy on such acquisition. 29. CALTRANS, independent of PROJECT, is responsible for any HM-1 found within the existing SHS right of way and will pay, or cause to be paid, all costs for HM MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES related to HM-1. CALTRANS will undertake, or cause to be undertaken, HM MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES related to HM-I with minimum impact to PROJECT schedule. 30. CALTRANS' obligations under this Agreement are subject to the appropriations of resources by the Legislature, the State Budget Act authority, and the allocation of funds by the California Transportation commission. 31. Neither CITY nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage, or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CALTRANS and/or its agents under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction conferred upon CALTRANS or under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that CALTRANS, to the extent permitted by law, will defend, indemnify, and save harmless CITY and all of its officers and employees from all claims, suits, or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth under, including,but not limited to,tortious, contractual, inverse condemnation, or other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CALTRANS and/or its agents under this Agreement. 32. Neither CALTRANS nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage, or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY and/or its agents under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction conferred upon CITY or under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that CITY, to the extent permitted by law,will defend, indemnify, and save harmless CALTRANS and all of its officers and employees from all claims, suits, or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth under, including,but not limited to, tortious, contractual, inverse condemnation, or other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY and/or its agents under this Agreement. ITEM NUMBER: A- 8 DATE: 03/26/13 Exhibit A 33. If work is done under contract (not completed by CITY's own employees) and is governed by the California Labor Code's definitions of a"public works" (section 1720(a)), that CITY will conform to sections 1720-1815 of the California Labor Code and all applicable regulations and coverage determinations issued by the Director of Industrial Relations. 34. This Agreement is intended to be PARTNERS' final expression and supersedes all prior oral understanding pertaining to PROJECT. 35. This Agreement will terminate 180 days after PID is signed by PARTNERS or as mutually agreed by PARTNERS in writing. However, all indemnification articles will remain in effect until terminated or modified in writing by mutual agreement. ITEM NUMBER: A- 8 DATE: 03/26/13 Exhibit A DEFINITIONS HM-1 —Hazardous material (including,but not limited to, hazardous waste) that may require removal and disposal pursuant to federal or state law whether it is disturbed by PROJECT or not. HM-2—Hazardous material (including,but not limited to, hazardous waste) that may require removal and disposal pursuant to federal or state law only if disturbed by PROJECT. HM MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES—Management activities related to either HM-1 or HM-2 including, without limitation, any necessary manifest requirements and disposal facility designations. PARTNER—Any individual signatory party to this Agreement. PARTNERS—The term that collectively references all of the signatory agencies to this Agreement. This term only describes the relationship between these agencies to work together to achieve a mutually beneficial goal. It is not used in the traditional legal sense in which one PARTNER's individual actions legally bind the other parties. SCOPE SUMMARY—The attachment in which each PARTNER designates its responsibility for the completion of specific work elements as outlined by the Guide to Capital Project Delivery Workplan Standards (previously known as WBS Guide) available at http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq//roj mgmt/guidanc e.htm. ITEM NUMBER: A- 8 DATE: 03/26/13 Exhibit A CONTACT INFORMATION The information provided below indicates the primary contact information for each PARTNER to this Agreement. PARTNERS will notify each other in writing of any personnel or location changes. Contact information changes do not require an amendment to this Agreement. The primary Agreement contact person for CALTRANS is: Richard Rosales, Project Manager 50 Higuera Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Office Phone: (805) 549-3792 The primary Agreement contact person for CITY is: Russell S. Thompson, Director of Public Works 6907 El Camino Real Atascadero, CA 93422 Office Phone: 805-470-3180 ITEM NUMBER: A- 8 DATE: 03/26/13 Exhibit A SIGNATURES PARTNERS declare that: 1. Each PARTNER is an authorized legal entity under California state law. 2. Each PARTNER has the authority to enter into this Agreement. 3. The people signing this Agreement have the authority to do so on behalf of their public agencies. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CITY OF ATASCADERO By: By: TIMOTHY M. GUBBINS WADE G. McKINNEY District Director City Manager Certified as to funds: Attest: By: By: Julia Bolger Marcia McClure Torgerson Resource Manager City Clerk Approved as to form and procedure: By: Brain A. Pierik City Attorney ITEM NUMBER: A- 8 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment SCOPE SUMMARY H WORK ELEMENT v U z 0.100.05.05.xx-Quality Management Plan X 0.100.05.05.xx-Risk Management Plan X 0.100.05.05.xx- Communication Plan X 0.100.05.10.xx- Cooperative Agreement for PA&ED Phase X 0.100.05.10.xx-Independent Quality Assurance (IQA) X 0.100.05.10.xx-Project Development Team Meetings X X 1.150.05.05 -Review of Existing Reports Studies and Mapping X 1.150.05.05.xx-Provision of Existing Reports,Data, Studies, and Mapping X 1.150.05.10 - Geological Hazards Review X 1.150.05.10.xx-Provision of Existing Geological Information X 1.150.05.15 -Utility Search X 1.150.05.15.xx-Provision of Existing Utility Information X 1.150.05.20 -Environmental Constraints Identification X 1.150.05.20.xx-Provision of Environmental Constraints Information X 1.150.05.25 - Traffic Forecasts/Modeling X 1.150.05.25.xx-Provision of Existing Traffic Forecasts/Modeling Information X 1.150.05.30 - Surveys and Maps for PID X 1.150.05.30.xx-Provision of Existing Surveys and Mapping X 1.150.05.35 -Problem Definition X 1.150.05.45 -As-Built Centerline and Existing Right of Way X 1.150.05.xx-Provision of Existing District Geotechnical Information X 1.150.10.05 -Public/Local Agency Input X 1.150.15.05 -Right of Way Data Sheets X 1.150.15.10 -Utility Relocation Requirements Assessment X 1.150.15.15 -Railroad Involvement Determination X 1.150.15.25 -Preliminary Materials Report X 1.150.15.35 -Multimodal Review X 1.150.15.40 -Hydraulic Review X 1.150.15.50 - Traffic Studies X 1.150.15.55 - Construction Estimates X 1.150.20.05 - Initial Noise Study X 1.150.20.10 -Hazardous Waste Initial Site Assessment X 1.150.20.15 - Scenic Resource and Landscape Architecture Review X 1.150.20.30 - Initial Records and Literature Search for Cultural Resources X 1.150.20.50 - Initial Water Quality Studies X 1.150.20.60 -Preliminary Environmental Analysis Report Preparation X 1.150.20.65 -Initial Paleontology Study X 1.150.25.05 -Draft PID X ITEM NUMBER: A- 8 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment Cn H � WORK ELEMEN. 1.150.25.20 -PID Circulation, Review, and Approval X 1.150.25.25 - Storm Water Data Report X 1.150.35 -Required Permits During PID Development X 1.150.40 -Permit Identification During PID Development X 1.150.45 -Base Maps and Plan Sheets for PID X ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Community Development Department PLN 2099-0848 / APL 2013-0017 / Amendment to CUP 2005-0157 Appeal to the City Council Affordable Housing Requirements (1155 EI Camino Real / Oakhaven Village, LLC) RECOMMENDATIONS: The affordable housing conditions for the Master Plan of Development (CUP) and Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) are inconsistent due to a clerical error in 2005. Staff recommends the City Council take one of the following actions to resolve this inconsistency. Council: 1. Adopt Draft Resolution "A" granting the applicant's appeal and amending condition 14 of Conditional Use Permit 2005-0157 (City Council Resolution 2005-076) to reflect a requirement that the project provide deed restrictions for 12 moderate income units within the project. OR 2. Adopt Draft Resolution "B" denying the applicant's appeal and amending Condition 11 of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) (City Council Resolution 2005-077) consistent with the approved Conditional Use Permit reflecting a requirement that the project provide deed restrictions for two (2) very low, five (5) low income and five (5) moderate income units within the project. REPORT-IN-BRIEF: The applicant is appealing the affordable housing requirement as conditioned in Master Plan of Development (CUP) 2005-0157, requiring deed restriction for two (2) very low, five (5) low, and five (5) moderate income units be provided within the ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 project. Having relied on the Vesting Tentative Tract Map resolution, staff and the applicant assumed the project was required to provide twelve (12) deed restricted moderate income units when restarting the project was discuss in 2012. After the applicant acquired the project, staff discovered that the Master Plan of Development (CUP) (City Council Resolution 2005-076), contained language requiring that the project provide deed restrictions for two (2) very low, five (5) low, and five (5) moderate income units. In conflict with this requirement, City Council Resolution 2005-077 for Vesting Tentative Map contained language requiring the applicant deed restrict twelve (12) moderate income units. Staff and the City Attorney have reviewed the project history and determined that in 2005 a clerical error between the Planning Commission and City Council hearings occurred that lead to this discrepancy. Staff is recommending the City Council correct this clerical error by determining the affordable housing requirements for the project. DISCUSSION: Situation and Facts: 1. Appellant: Oakhaven Village LLC, 3160 Ocean Terrance, Marina, CA 93933 2. Project Owner/Applicant: Oakhaven Village LLC, 3160 Ocean Terrance, Marina, CA 93933 3. Project Address 1155 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 4. General Plan Designation: High Density Residential (HDR) 5. Zoning District: Residential Multi-Family (RMF-20) / Planned Development (PD-26) 6. Site Area 5.5 acres 7. Existing Use Vacant 8. Environmental Status: Certified Negative Declaration per City Council Resolution 2005-075 Background: On July 19, 2005 the Planning Commission recommended the City Council approve a Planned Development overlay zone, a Master Plan of Development (CUP) and Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) for a 62-unit small lot single family residential home development within the residential multi-family zone ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 (RMF-20). The Planning Commission's recommendation of approval to the City Council included a motion to modify the inclusionary affordable housing condition that was originally included in the conditions of approval for both the CUP and the VTTM. On August 9, 2005, the City Council held a public hearing to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval of the project. The staff report was revised and included a revision of the inclusionary affordable housing discussion to reflecting the Planning Commission's modification. However, the CUP and VTTM resolutions had the following affordable housing conflicts: Council Resolutions Inclusionary housing condition Council Resolution 2005-076 two (2) very low income units, Master Plan of Development (CUP) five (5) low income units five (5) moderate income units (see attachment 3 — condition 14) Council Resolution 2005-077 twelve (12) moderate income units Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM) (see attachment 4 — condition 11) On a 3-0 roll call vote, the City Council adopted Resolution 2005-076 and Resolution 2005-077, with two different affordable housing conditions. The two resolutions were signed with the clerical error. The original applicant commenced building plans and submitted subdivision improvement plans and for Final Map approval from 2005 through 2007. It is unknown if the original applicant was aware of the error in the resolutions. Due to the collapse of the housing market, the developer lost the project in foreclosure. In 2012, the property was purchased by Oakhaven Village LLC. The applicant met with staff numerous times in 2012 to discuss modifications to the project. During the meetings, staff and the applicant reviewed the VTTM resolution and all assumed the project condition for 12 deed restricted moderate income units was correct. On December 18, 2012, the Planning Commission approved PC Resolution 2012- 0021 amending Conditional Use Permit 2005-0157. The Staff Report and Resolution reflected the inclusionary housing language that was contained in City Council Resolution 2005-076. City Council Resolution 2005-076 two (2) very low income units, master plan of development five (5) low income units (CUP) five (5) moderate income units ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 The applicant did not raise the issue of the inconsistent affordable housing requirement until after the Planning Commission's approval in December. City Staff met with the applicant on January 17, 2013 to discuss the differences in the affordable housing condition from both resolutions. Staff informed the applicant that only the City Council could modify the affordable housing policy and recommended the applicant file an appeal. The applicant filed an appeal and is requesting that the City Council modify the affordable housing unit conditions of approval. Analysis: The following events occurred based on the project record: 1. Staff produced a Report for the July 19, 2005 Planning Commission Hearing. In this Staff Report, Staff interpreted the Affordable Housing Requirement to consist of twelve (12) moderate income units because the proposed product consists of single family residential homes. 2. At the July 19, 2005 Planning Commission hearing, staff clarified that the Affordable Housing Requirement for a multi-family land use may be applicable. This was done during the presentation of the Staff Report to the Planning Commission. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission make this change as a part of its motion to recommend approval of the project to the City Council. 3. On July 19, 2005, the Planning Commission adopted PC 2005-0047 recommending that the City Council approve Conditional Use permit 2005- 0157 (Master Plan of Development) and PC 2005-0048 recommending that the City Council approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map 2005-0067 with changes to the conditions of approval that included modifications to the inclusionary housing condition to reflect the inclusion of two (2) very low, five (5) low, and five (5) moderate deed restricted units throughout the development, consistent with the City's Council's Affordable Housing Policy. 4. Staff revised its report to the City Council to reflect the Inclusionary Affordable Housing changes as recommended by the Planning Commission. Specifically, the staff report states "A condition of approval has been added to ensure that this requirement is met (Condition CUP 14, 15/TTM 11, 12)." 5. Staff revised condition 14 of Resolution 2005-076, Master Plan of Development (CUP) to reflect the Inclusionary Affordable Housing Changes, as recommended by the Planning Commission to read two (2) very low, five (5) low, and five (5) moderate deed restricted units throughout the development. 6. Staff did not revise condition 11 of Resolution 2005-076, Vesting Tentative Map to reflect the Inclusionary Affordable Housing Changes. This condition stated that twelve (12) moderate deed restricted units were to be constructed throughout the development. ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 7. On August 9, 2005, the City Council held a public hearing to approve the Oakhaven Development. 8. On August 9, 2005, the City Council, on a 3-0 roll call vote, adopted Resolution 2005-076, Master Plan of Development and Resolution 2005-077, Vesting Tentative Tract Map, with differing language in regards to the affordable housing requirements. It has been determined that a clerical error occurred. Appellant Justification The appellant is requesting the City Council amend condition 14 of Conditional Use Permit 2005-0157 to reflect a requirement that the project be required to provide twelve (12) deed restricted moderate income units because the project is a single family residential project, consistent with the single family use as described in the City's Inclusionary Housing Policy. Staff Comment: The project is a single family land use since it proposes 62 single- family homes, on individual lots for individual buyers for which the City Council may interpret that the applicant provide 100% Moderate Income, deed restricted units; however the project is located in a multi-family land use area (High Density Residential designation / Residential Multi-Family Zoning district) and thus the distribution of affordable units in multi-family and mixed use commercial land use areas also may be applicable. Since there is a clerical error that needs to be resolved between the conflicting resolutions, the City Council has complete discretion to resolve the conflict as it sees fit. CONCLUSION: Staff is supportive of the project changes that the applicant is proposing. The DRC has recommended the project redesign to be approved by the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission has approved the redesign. The remaining issue prior to finalizing the subdivision map is the affordable housing condition. The Inclusionary Housing Policy was adopted by the City Council in 2003 to ensure affordable housing be included for various income groups throughout the City. Ultimately this is a Council decision. Staff is supportive of either the multi-family designation of two (2) very low, five (5) low and five (5) moderate deed restricted income units or the inclusion of twelve (12) moderate deed restricted units. In 2011 and 2012, similar units as proposed in Oakhaven were sold that fall within the price guidelines for moderate income housing units as established by San Luis Obispo County. ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 The Council may chose either option or discuss alternatives that it deems consistent with the Inclusionary Housing Policy. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. The City will continue to collect development impact fees on affordable housing units; however, staff time is spent in the administration of deed restricted units including income verification, maintenance of files and recordation of the units. ALTERNATIVES: 1. The City Council may propose alternatives to the Inclusionary Housing Policy that it deems consistent with the intent of the Policy. This alternative should be clearly stated in any motion. 2. The Council may determine that more information is needed on some aspect of the project and may refer the item back to the applicant and staff to develop the additional information. The Council should clearly state the type of information that is required and move to continue the item to a future date. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: Location Map, Zoning and General Plan Attachment 2: Aerial Map Attachment 3: 2005 Council Resolution No. 2005-076, Conditional Use Permit Attachment 4: 2005 Council Resolution No. 2005-077, Vesting Tentative Map Attachment 5: Draft Resolution A: Granting the applicant's appeal and amending condition 14 of Conditional Use Permit 2005-0157 Attachment 6: Draft Resolution B: Denying the applicant's appeal and amend Condition 11 of City Council Resolution 2005-077 ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 1: Location Map,General Plan and Zoning Project Site ] RM F-20 1 W ` tl� Existing General Plan Designation: HDR Existing Zoning District: RMF-20/PD-26 ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 2: Aerial Map d39 r. "-5 mm— or y� r I Oakhaven " Village ~ =:r ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 3: 2005 Council Resolution 2005-076(CUP) RESOLUTION NO.2005-076 A RESOLUTION OF 711E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 21054)157(MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT)ON APN 049-042-018 (1155 El Camino ReaVWehn Group LI.C) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Wehn Group Ur (934 Sycamore Canyun.Paso Robles,CA 93446)Applicant and Property Owmcr,to consider a project consisting of a Zone Change from RMF-16 (Residential Multi-family 16) to RMF 161 PD26(Residential Multi-Family-16 with a Planned Development Overlay 26) with corresponding Ma,tcr Plan of Development and vesting'I'entitive Tract Map on a 5.47-acre site located at 1155 EI Camino Real.(APN 0•I9 n12 018):and. WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designwiun is HDR (Iligh Density Residcnual);and. WHEREAS, the Planning Commissiun has recommended that the site's Zoning v►strict be changed from RMF-l6(Residential Multi Family 16)to RNIF-16 with PD26 (Residential Multi Family 16 with a Planned Development Overlay 26);and, WHEREAS,the PD 26 Overlay Distort requires the adoption of a Master Pian of f-%evejopmem,approved in the form of a Conditional Use Permit.and, WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Mitiguted Negative Declaration 2(X)5- 0028 were prepared for the project andd made available for public tevicw in xcordunce with the requirements of die Culifarnia Environmental Quality Act(CEQA1;und, WHEREAS. the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and It"] guidelines for implemenlatinn of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)have been adhered tu;and, WHERF-1S,a timely and properly noticed Public Herrring upon the subject Zone Change applicblion was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence,oral anti &K-umentary. wus admitted on behalf of said Master Plan of Development:and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the Cily of Ataxadcru, ut a duly noticed Public Nearing held un July 19,2005 studied and considered the Conditional Use Permit 2005-01.57(Waster Plan of Development),after first studying and considering the Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project,and ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 City of Abwcadero Resolution No.1005-1176 Pape 2 of 31 WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Atascadero,at a duly noticed Public (fearing held on August 9, 2005,studied and considered Conditional Use Permit 2005- 0157 (Master Plan of Development), after first studying and considering the Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project,and, NOW, '(HEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atauadem takes the following actions- SECTION 1. Findinz for Approval or Conditional Use Permit. The City Council finds as follows: 1. The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan and the City's Appearance Review Manuel;and, 2 The propxsed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of the 'Title (zoning Ordinance)including provisions of the PD-26 Overlay Zone;and, 3. The establishment,and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not. because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case,be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use;and, 4. The proposed project or use will not he inconsistent with the character or the immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development;and, 5. The proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project,either existing or to be improved in con'junciion with the pniject, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the surrounding neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance with the Land Use Elcment. 6. The Master Plan of Development standards or processing requirements will enhance the opportunity to best utilize special characteristics of an area and will have a beneficial effect on the area;and 7. Benefits dcnved from the Master Plan of Development and Custom PD overlay zone cannot be reasonably achieved through existing development standards or proccssing requirements;and, 8. The proposed project will not result in substantial detrimental effects on the enjoyment and use of adjoining properties;and, 9. The modified height will not exceed the lifesaving equipment capabilities of the Fire Department L ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 City of Ataseadere Ret►lutlon No.2005-076 Poge 3 of 31 %W SECTION 2.Flndines for Approval of Tree Retrieval, The City Council finds as follows: 1. The trees arc obstructing proposed improvements that cannot he rrasonably designed to avoid the need for tree removal,ac certified by a report from the Site Planner and determinLd by the Community TJrvclupmcni Department based on the following factors: • Early consultation with the City; • Consideration of practical design alternatives; • Provision of cost comparisons (from applicant) for practical design alternatives; • If saving fire eliminates:ill reasonable uses of the properly;or • If saving the tree i"utres the removal of more desirable trees_ SECTION I Aporoval. The City Council of the City of Atascadero,in a regular session assembled on August 9,2fV5 resolved to approve Conditional Use Permit?(1(15 0157(Master Plan of Development)and Tree Removal Permit subject to the following: EXHIBf f A. Conditions of approval/Mitigation Monitor,ng Program EXHIBIT B. Master Plan of Development EXI1fBTT C: Floor Plan A '%W EXHIBIT D: Floor Plan A Sections and Elevations EXHIBIT E. Floor Plan B EXHIBIT F: Fluor Plan B Sectums and Elevations EXHIBIT G: Floor Plan C EXHIBIT 11-- Flom,Plan C Swoons and Elevations EXHIBIT 1: Project Site Sections and Entry EXHIBIT J: Preliminary Landscape Plan EXHIBTTK: Tree Protection Plan EXHIBIT I.: Grading.Drainage and Utility Plan(2 sheets) %W ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 City of Alascadero Resolution No.2005-076 Page 4 or J1 err On nuition by Council Member O'Malley and secondcd by Council Member Pacas,the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call v u1e: AYES: Council Members O'Malley.Pacas and Mayor Scalise NOES: None ABSENT: Council Members Clay and Lama ADOPTED: August 9.2005 CITY OF ATASC PERO Wen 5culi Aiayor ATTEST: Marcia McClure Torgerson.C.M.C. .ity C1ed, `► ) APPRUy6, tiriy S TO : - ;Al-tomcy Patrice-n ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 City of Atuccatlero Resolution No.2005-076 Page5ofm E%NISIT Ar ConaiUons of Approval t Mltigatlen Mar toeiag Program Pisnned 0eveloprrieat_26 JCUP 200941571ZCH 20054161JTTY 20060067 Conditions of Approval,' Tlydsb aeepe"Oft"Y lAlU6Ylan Mitigation Monitoring Program 0110"kerins noeom o pa- iia n tsu... 66 aau�rfintr The Vlltaga at Oakhaven ivrr vn... intw.cr.+ utt 4rpr 2CH 2005-0101,CUP 2005-0157,TTM 2005 0067 rM waw. ;water rr 5*,Ipa. itrpq lO tw owm Planing Services I. The approval of this zone c wge and use permit shall become final and FM Ps aRYcirm 30 days iotlavAr g rily Council approval 2 The approval of this use panda shell become total and effective for the !M p8 purposes of issuing bulling permits 11"(301 days following Uxr City Counal approval of ZCH 2006-0096 and ZCH 200"101 upon second readrig, urtlese prior b that isne,an appeal to the decision as filed as set lath In Socwn 9-1 111(b)of the Zcnirx)Ordnance. 3, The Catrntinny Dweeioprnent Departmra aha*have Ino aulhorily to approve P$,CE Clie Ioluwl xV meta changes to the protect that(1 I rnodlty the site pian proted by less then 10%,(2l restC In a supenor site deWn or appearance,andlor (31 ad9ress a construction dosign issue that Is not s tbslanb•.*to Clio►,taster Plan of Development. Any cVwf changes to the Mostar Plan 0 Devaioprneqt shat L5 subpd to Cie CowcA approval.Any assoclaleva Tentative Maps tnless shat ce srblad to Planting Commission approvef A Approval of utas Conditional Use PermR shall be vaMd far ierelve 11—2)months Bpi FSI P Mar its oRootwo dale At the enact the period,the approval&Hall expire aril become rxill and veld unless me prujrxl hes received a txwd.Jing peffml. 5 hold tietmlasa aha Cdy of Ongoing Ps Alaacsdero or is agants officers,aw antployeos agertsl any Oauit ot action btoughl t0 challenge an approves by the aty,or arty d its entllles,com:emng the sibdrvwlon L6 AN stbsequeM Taraelhre Map and consirucllon parrots steep be cordowera BP 1 FM Ps,CE �;.-�L�— with Uta Master Piot d Oweelopmm oontmed baron. F&Vw Plan oI Dave0climetd as.&*own In EXIII81T 8.D.F and ti Hath the ifollowing rrodAtcaAxts. • A4 e>terlw maleriil linOws Isak,w,J it s, dount,windows,light t+><tures, gare}e doors)stall be durat:le,nigh quality,and con stmt with the w chiloc a,M apouaiance ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 City of Atawadero Resolution No.2005.076 Page 7 of 31 Conditions of Approval I ye.ina fl-W—WNllty stinr Mitigation Monitoring Program aAudterYy sum n.w-y iwtw � Tho V!llage of Onkhnven r,... � rDr«aw.... M•Kr r4••+.• ®bY�h•w cc py W+• ZCH 2005 0101,CUP 2005-0157, rTM 2005-0067 n r.„�.•• vnr•.r..rr ,., a WNMd nUM— • —Froni yard areas sham be iandscaf aW with drought rolerarlt epeoles, subject to stall approval, • Outdorx lurnttra shall be irclydod on fie rnproveraenl piens and sheen be maintained by the homeowners assoaatlon,subiea to sant appronaf • Oak Wow"be Incorporated in 10 the detention basin lertdscspirtg, 13.The developer arwor subsequent owner sltaa aw ne responwisitty for the — — eonirluaf maintenance of all tan lscape and crsrimon areas,consistent with EXHIBIT J. 14. Affordable Housing pegrrkement The aroicant shalt nlo¢d restrict a &Fm—p PS,CA rranrman ol 12 restdeneal units luf 30 y,aa,s fa or to or ccricunerttry,will the trial map The vicome reslrwewns sf at tie as follcw•s: • 2 very-low income units 5 low-incoma reds Now 5 moderale incorne units All urwfs salol be dislrbuled dvcaighout the protect,subject to staff approval. t 5 Wwkfofce frauehwg Prior to recordlafion of 1stAI map,the appficaro SlisU enter BP PS,CA ��- 7 into a legal agteemenl vMh Ilre City to reserve'k of the rails lot sale to residents or workaris within the City od Atescadetu,nckiding the affordable urds the ayrarrmonl"g rwckide the tdirnwrrig proti ssona: • fire iurts shall be offered for sale to residents or workers within the City of Atascadero for a minimum of 60-dnys During this sore period clefs may only be accepted from Alascadero restdenta or workers, • The applrcani shall WWda roasonntde proof to the CAV that at load one of the qualified t:uyers Is a reside%or worker within the Cay Limos of Atascadero; t • The Atascadero tesidenl or w7vker resdlction shell apply to the Initial sale only; The applic"shall k1r>rrtdy rwhrch units wil be reserved;and The City Allnley sham approve tie Md term of the agreement. 16. A Trp Prelethal Plan steam be submitted 20th subsegrrant buiding perms GPMP for anrrosc ritiont within the drip Ine of natna rreus located on the sublect pasoel and arty add scent properties.The appicanl vA contract wash a cettllied arbortet to moues am activity within the drip lines of eWsbng native oak trees. 17 An address matter to include address tar W'nils sivill be ionated al the OPJBP PS P'AW street across hint Tho address marker stall be compatible with am V presort arhilecture ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 4: 2005 Council Resolution 2005-077(Vesting Tentative Tract Map) RESOLUTION NO.2005-077 %W A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2005-0067,A SIXTY-TWO LOT SUBDIVISION CONSISTENT WITH A MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT ON APN 049-042-018 (1155 EI Camino Real/Wehn Group LLC) WHEREAS, art application has been received 1'ronl Wehn Group LLC(934 Sycamore Canyon,Paso Robles,CA 934461 Applicant and Preperty(honer,to consider a project consisting of a?.one Change from RMF-16(Residential Mul i-ramily-16) In RMF-16/ PD26 Mcsidenriat Multi-Family 16 with a Planned Developrrrerit Overlay 26) with corresponding Master Plan of Development and Vesting Tentative Tract tvlap on a {.47-acre site located at 1151 F1 Camino Rcal.(APN 049-W2-0111;anti. WHEREAS.the Rite's General Plat Designation is HDR filigh Density Residential): and, WHEREAS,the Planning Commission has resomincnded that the site's 7.ontng District he changed from RMF-16(Rexidenlial Mulfi-Family-16)to RMF-16/PD26(Residential Multi- Farnily-161Planned Developownt Overlay 261:and. WHEREAS,an Initial Study and Dialt Mitigated Negative Declaration 2005-N121 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with die requirernents of the Califoinia Envitonmental Quality Act(CEQA);and. WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation aril public notice of environmental documents,as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the Califortim Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)have been adhered to:nnd, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Vesting Tentative'Dract Map;)),plication oras held by the Planning Ccwnntisston of the City of Atrascadero at which hearing evidence.oral and documentary,was admitted on behalf of said Master Plan t)f Development;and. WHEREAS, the Planning Ctunrnission td tbte City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on July 19. 2005 studied and considered Tentative Tract Map 2005-0067, after first studying and considering the Propomd Mitigated Negative Declatation prepared for the project.and WHEREAS.the City Council of the City of At.wadero,at a duly noticed Public Heating held on August 9. 3085, studied and considered Tentative Tract Map 2Ub44X)67, after first studying and considering the Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project; rrr and. ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Olv of Atwwadrro ReaAulion No.2t1115•r177 Page 2 of 17 `► NOWTHEREFORE.the City Council of the City of Atascadero takes the following actions: SECTION 1. Findings or Appn►val for Vesting Tentative Tract Map,the City Council finds as follows: I, The proposed subdivision,design and improvements as conditioned,is consistent with the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements,including provisions of the PD-26 overlay district 2. "fhc proposed suWivision,as conditioned,is consistent with the proposed Planned fkvekyrment Overlay District-26 Master Plan of Development(CUP 20054)167). I The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the density of development proposed. 5. 'The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmcntnl damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. 6. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with casements acquired by the public at large for access through,or the use of property within,the proposed subdivision:or substantially equivalent alternative easements are provided, 7. Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions(CC&R's)or equivalent shall he required that incorporate the Master Plan of Development conditions of approval to ensure that the site retains the proposed qualities(architecture,colors.materials,plan amenities,fencing,and landscaping)over time. R. The proposed subdivision design and type of improvements proposed will not be detrimental to the health,safety or welfare of the general public. ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 City of Arascadero Rmolulkm No.2(X64177 hire 3 of 17 SECTION 2. ApprovaL The City Council of the City of Atascadero, in a regular `. session assembled on August 9.2o15. resolved to approve Vesting Tentative'Tract Map('1-I'M 2005-(H)67)subject to the following: 1. Exhibit A: Vesting Tentative Tract Map 2005-(X)67 2. Fxhibit B:Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program. On motion by Council Member O'Malley anti seconded by Council Member Pacas,the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: Council Members O'Malley.Pacas and Mayor Scalise NOES: Note ABSENT: Council Memt)crrs Clay and tuna ADOPTED: August 9,2005 Cff'Y OF ATASC,IrtUERO ` Y. N' dy Sc- isc,Mayor A-1-FEST: Marcia McClure Torgerson,C.M_C„ .ity Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Patrick Emig t.. ity Attofmy ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Of of Atwodcro Resolution No.2W."77 Paye,t of 17 EKlubll A!Voaling*r•ntatWv Tract Mop r r Will fit 1 tt 1, r • •� ~� X65���� � f slit I� i • �. JW 1 ILI ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 City of.Afasradero Resolution No.2005-077 Palte 7 of 17 rI Conditions of Approval trr.a R„°oroieurry —Mtwtlfaw - \r 1 Mitigation Monitoring Program u'cr%n.f TNrm7'^�. The Village at Oakhaven �St�elo f til K..a«rb. It nc.ts..s.. Vesting Tentative Tract Map rurwrwr Lf=rev.. TTM 20050067 ID 10-0a "Y° . rbrp.q :!q a.w n is wp.in .rwa':rt.r,.Y r s r•r�s.n t cj Resirinit5 she$ keep all trash recepladas **Nn the units -- destpnnted Irayr storage area i d) Garngux shall bo maavmfied and used lot vehicle parking e) No boars.RVs of of+•,er type of recreatan vet trie Indy oocwy a goose or resdert parking space, incrusting wow an individual 9.arage. 1) A lrovisirri lot:evww arxi approval by the C*V Community Ckn%4opmonl Department for any changes to the r.cans Item m4f ,lc+to me abow rer"emer!cs pilot to are Ganges hairy recorded or lakina e@ecL 11. Allordable Housing fiequirenrerrt GPOSP MCA mk rnein of 12 reskferkinl units for 30 years,at the mockeraW income rsW Al uruls shat be distrdwInd Ihreuglxxn the propri,sab)ect to s:afl approval 12. Workiorr;o 1lousrrg Prior to t000dalior of fatal map.the applrarr¢Shat 13P PS•CA to residents or workers Ndhin the City of Atiscrxinro,indhrtding tiro allordahk+roils Tiro a7eammt nhat include the fdlorwrg pr mstons: • Thn ows shall he offered Nit sate to residents of workers wi0xn the City of Atascadem for a minimum of 60--jays. Wing Itvs time period offers may only be accepted train Afascadero rosctents or work": • I he applicant elrall provide reaxrurblo profit to the City that al least ono of the qualr6od buyers is a re6siarrf or wnrker #Mbin the City Lmits of Alascadero. • the Alaseadoro residMrt or worker taslrialian shall apply to the initial sale only, • The a>F h-ATY.ahei ui[nafy which urrrls Y%-dl he msarvnd,and The Cay Atlomey stall approve the final lwn of ere agreement. 13. 1 he devoioper nnd,'or sruirxqueru owner still aMxno msponvhiily for Ongolnq ——PS the oenanued(I Aniftmi :e of al!landscape and conrrion aeons 1A Deed noflficelion shall Us recoryad against Iola 21,25,end 25 erpressirg the requirements SW mainlenarse rospxnabillfles of the tarIdsc-spo bultor. City Engirwer Conditions PROJECT SPECIFIC CONDITIONS ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 5: Draft Resolution A Granting the applicant's appeal and amending condition 14 of Conditional Use Permit 2005-0157 DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO GRANTING THE APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2005- 0157 AMENDING CONDITION 14 TO REQUIRE TWLEVE (12) DEED RESTRICTED MODERATE INCOME UNITS APN 049-042-018 1155 EL CAMINO REAL (OAKHAVEN VILLAGE, LLC WHEREAS, an application has been received from Oakhaven Village LLC, 3160 Ocean Terrace, Marina, CA 93933, (Owner and Applicant) to consider an appeal to Conditional Use Permit 2005-0157 condition 14 that requires that the developer set aside 30 year deed restricted affordable housing units for two (2) very low, five (5) low, and five (5) moderate income throughout the development at 1155 El Camino Real (APN 049-042-018); and, WHEREAS, the site's current General Plan Designation is High Density Residential (HDR); and, WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is Multi-Family Residential (RMF-20) with a Planned Development Overlay(PD-26); and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing on July 19, 2005, the Planning Commission adopted PC 2005-0047 recommending that the City Council approve Conditional Use permit 2005-0157 (Master Plan of Development) and PC 2005-0048 recommending that the City Council approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map 2005-0067 with changes to the conditions of approval that included modifications to the inclusionary housing condition to reflect the inclusion of two (2) very low, five (5) low, and five (5) moderate deed restricted units throughout the development, consistent with the City's Council's Affordable Housing Policy; and, WHEREAS, Staff revised its report to the City Council to reflect the Inclusionary Affordable Housing changes as recommended by the Planning Commission; and, WHEREAS, Staff reported to the City Council that conditions of approval had been added to ensure that this requirement is met(Condition CUP 14, /TTM 11); and, ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing on August 9, 2005, the City Council, on a 3-0 roll call vote, adopted Resolution 2005-076, Master Plan of Development and Resolution 2005-077, Vesting Tentative Tract Map; and, WHEREAS, it was the intent of the City Council that the project conditions of approval include twelve (12) moderate deed restricted units throughout the development, consistent with the City's Affordable Housing Policy; and, WHEREAS, a clerical error had occurred on City Council Resolution 2005-076 (CUP), Condition 14 that does not reflect the project conditions as intended by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the proposed project was required to provide inclusionary housing due the approval of a Planned Development Overlay, which requires a legislative approval by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the inclusionary housing policy requires the that twenty (20) percent of the total project is set aside for affordable housing; and, WHEREAS, the project is proposing the development of sixty-two (62) small lot single family residential homes; and, WHEREAS, the City's inclusionary housing policy requires that single family residential uses set aside twenty (20) percent of its total units to moderate income qualified home buyers, and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Conditional Use Permit application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said application; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on December 19, 2012, approved amendments to Conditional Use Permit 2005-0157, after first studying and considering the testimony and the environmental determination prepared for the project, and, WHEREAS, an appeal of the project was received within the 14 day project appeal period by the project applicant and property owner at 1155 El Camino Real, and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on March 26, 2013, studied and considered the appeal of Conditional Use Permit 2005-0157, after first studying and considering the materials prepared for the project, and, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero takes the following actions: ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 SECTION 1. Findings for Granting the Appeal and amending CUP 2005-0157. The City Council finds as follows: 1. The proposed project is a single family residential use, 2. The percentage of units within the project must be affordable shall be twenty (20) percent of the total project. 3. The distribution of affordable units in single family land use areas shall 100% Moderate. 4. The project is required to provide twelve (12) deed restricted affordable housing units for the moderate income group. SECTION 3. Amendment. The City Council of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on March 12, 2013, resolved to grant the appeal and amended Conditional Use Permit 2005-0157 subject to the following: EXHIBIT A: Conditions of approval /Mitigation Monitoring Program EXHIBIT B: Master Plan of Development (2012 Amendment) EXHIBIT C: Floor Plan A(2012 Amendment) EXHIBIT D: Floor Plan A Sections and Elevations (2012 Amendment) EXHIBIT E: Floor Plan B (2012 Amendment) EXHIBIT F: Floor Plan B Sections and Elevations (2012 Amendment) EXHIBIT G: Floor Plan C(2012 Amendment) EXHIBIT H: Floor Plan C Sections and Elevations (2012 Amendment) EXHIBIT 1: Floor Plan D (2012 Amendment) EXHIBIT J: Floor Plan D Section and Elevations (2012 Amendment) EXHIBIT L: Project Site Sections and Entry(2012 Amendment) EXHIBIT M: Preliminary Landscape Plan (2012 Amendment) EXHIBIT N: Tree Protection Plan EXHIBIT O: Grading, Drainage and Utility Plan(2 sheets) EXHIBIT P: Approved Street Sections EXHIBIT Q: Proposed Circulation Layout On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 CITY OF ATASCADERO By: Tom O'Malley, Mayor ATTEST: Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Brian Pierik, City Attorney ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT A:Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program Planned Development-26/CUP 2005-0157/ZCH 2005-0101/TTM 2005-0067 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning Services BL:Business BS:Building Services The Vi//age at Oakhaven License FD:Fire Department GP:Grading Permit PD:Police Department BP:Building Permit CE:City Engineer FI:Final Inspection WW:Wastewater ZCH 2005-0101, CUP 2005-0157, TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary CA:City nttomey Occupancy F0:Final Occupancy Planning Services 1. The approval of this zone change and use permit shall become final FM PS and effective 30-days following City Council approval. 2. The approval of this use permit shall become final and effective for FM PS the purposes of issuing building permits thirty(30)days following the City Council approval of ZCH 2005-0099 and ZCH 2005-0101 upon second reading,unless prior to that time,an appeal to the decision is filed as set forth in Section 9-1.111(b)of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The Community Development Department shall have the authority to BP/FM PS,CE approve the following minor changes to the project that(1)modify the site plan project by less than 10%, (2)result in a superior site design or appearance,and/or(3)address a construction design issue that is not substantive to the Master Plan of Development. Any other changes to the Master Plan of Development shall be subject to City Council approval.Any associated Tentative Maps unless shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. 4. Approval of this Conditional Use Permit shall be valid for twelve(12) BP/FM PS menths twenty-four(24)months after its effective date. At the end of the period,the approval shall expire and become null and void unless the project has received a building permit. 5. The applicant shall defend,indemnify,and hold harmless the City of Ongoing PS Atascadero or its agents, officers,and employees against any claim or action brought to challenge an approval by the city,or any of its entities,concerning the subdivision 6. All subsequent Tentative Map,Subdivision Improvement Plans and BP/FM PS,CE construction permits shall be consistent with the Master Plan of Development contained herein,as amended. 7. All exterior elevations,finish materials and colors shall be consistent BP PS with the Master Plan of Development as shown in EXHIBIT B, D, F and H,J,and M with the following modifications: ■ All exterior material finishes(siding,trim,doors,windows,light fixtures,garage doors)shall be durable, high quality,and consistent with the architectural appearance. ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning Services BL:Business BS:Building Services The Vi//age at Oakhaven License FD:Fire Department GP:Grading Permit PD:Police Department BP:Building Permit CE:City Engineer FI:Final Inspection WW:Wastewater ZCH 2005-0101, CUP 2005-0157, TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary CA:City Attomey Occupancy F0:Final Occupancy ■ Stucco siding shall be smooth troweled or light sand finish. ■ Roofs shall be architectural grade dimensional shingles. 8. All site development shall comply with the standards of the Planned BP PS, BS Development 26 Overlay District. 9. All site work,grading,and site improvements shall be consistent with BP/FM PS, BS,CE the Master Plan of Development as shown in EXHIBIT BSI .M,O, P and Q,with the following modifications: \Nhero foaoihle and a apprGved by the fro depaictmen+ IGGpe J streets or por+iens thereof shall be.J osigRed as on way Street sections and widths shall be consistent with Exhibits P and Q.One-Way looped streets may be utilized as approved by the Fire Department and where designed in Exhibit Q. ■ Should the width of pavement decrease around the proposed neighborhood park,sidewalks shall be provided around the open space area. ■ The applicant shall work with staff to maximize pedestrian connections throughout the project with additional sidewalks where feasible,the inclusion of speed tables,and crosswalks. ■ The use of river-rock base or other similar material may be utilized on Plan B. ■ Prosect amenities such as signage,mailboxes,and other decorative features shall be approved by Staff and/or the Design Review Committee as directed by the Planning Director. 10. All project fencing shall be installed consistent with EXHIBIT B, I and GP/BP PS J subject to the following modifications: ■ Fencing material and treatment shall comply with the PD26 standards. ■ Final fence location shall be subject to staff approval with a detail drawing to be included as a part of the Subdivision Improvement Plan. 11. €iaal Selection of colors and materials shall be subjeGt te``a GP/BP PS appreval and consistent with the master plan of development Exhibits, D, F, H and J.Any deviations from these colors and materials shall be subject to Staff and/or DRC approval as determined by the Planning Director. 12. A final landscape and irrigation plan shall be approved prier to the of h,hiding permits as a part of the Subdivision Improvement Plan and included a&n +te improvements plarl ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning Services BL:Business BS:Building Services The Vi//age at Oakhaven License FD:Fire Department GP:Grading Permit PD:Police Department BP:Building Permit CE:City Engineer FI:Final Inspection WW:Wastewater ZCH 2005-0101, CUP 2005-0157, TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary CA:City Attomey Occupancy FO:Final Occupancy consistent with EXHIBIT JX,and as follows: ■ All exterior meters,air conditioning units and mechanical equipment shall be screened with landscape material. ■ All areas shown on the landscape plan shall be landscaped by the developer prior to the final of aRY SiRgle b6i ldiRg^ FRit GR site individual lot building permits and/or subdivision improvement plan. ■ Final tree list shall be submitted with building permits subdivision improvement plan,subject to staff approval. ■ Street and open space trees shall be minimum 15-gallon size and double staked. ■ Front yard areas shall be landscaped with drought tolerant species and be consistent with the City's Water efficient landscape ordinance.All landscaping will be subject to staff approval. ■ Outdoor furniture shall be included in common open space areas and shown on the subdivision improvement plans and shall be maintained by the homeowners association,subject to staff approval. ■ Oak trees shall be incorporated in to the detention basin landscaping. 13. The developer and/or subsequent owner shall assume responsibility for the continued maintenance of all landscape and common areas, consistent with EXHIBIT J. 14. Affordable Housing Requirement: The applicant shall deed restrict a GP/BP PS,CA minimum of 12 residential units for 30 years, prior to or concurrently with the final map.The income restrictions shall be as follows: • 12 moderate income units All units shall be distributed throughout the project,subject to staff approval. 15. Workforce Housing: Prior to recordation of final map,the BP PS,CA applicant shall enter into a legal agreement with the City to reserve%of the units for sale to residents or workers within the City of Atascadero,including the affordable units. The agreement shall include the following provisions: ■ The units shall be offered for sale to residents or workers within the City of Atascadero for a minimum of ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning Services BL:Business BS:Building Services The Vi//age at Oakhaven License FD:Fire Department GP:Grading Permit PD:Police Department BP:Building Permit CE:City Engineer FI:Final Inspection WW:Wastewater ZCH 2005-0101, CUP 2005-0157, TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary CA:City Attomey Occupancy FO:Final Occupancy 60-days. During this time period offers may only be accepted from Atascadero residents or workers; ■ The applicant shall provide reasonable proof to the City that at least one of the qualified buyers is a resident or worker within the City Limits of Atascadero; ■ The Atascadero resident or worker restriction shall apply to the initial sale only; ■ The applicant shall identify which units will be reserved; and The City Attorney shall approve the final form of the agreement. 16. A Tree Protection Plan shall be submitted with subsequent building GP/BP PS permits for encroachment within the drip line of native trees located on the subject parcel and any adjacent properties.The applicant will contract with a certified arborist to monitor all activity within the drip lines of existing native oak trees. 17. An address marker to include address for all units shall be located at GP/BP PS the public street access point.The address marker shall be compatible with the project architecture. 18. The emergency services and facility maintenance costs listed BP PS below shall be 100%funded by the project in perpetuity. The service and maintenance costs shall be funded through a community facilities district established by the City at the developer's cost. The funding mechanism must be in place prior to or concurrently with acceptance of the final maps. The funding mechanism shall be approved by the City Attorney, City Engineer and Administrative Services Director prior to acceptance of any final map. The administration of the above mentioned funds shall be by the City. Developer agrees to participate in the community facilities district and to take all steps reasonably required by the City with regard to the establishment of the district and assessment of the property. ■ All Atascadero Police Department service costs to the project. ■ All Atascadero Fire Department service costs to the project. ■ Off-site common City of Atascadero park facilities maintenance service costs related to the project. 19. All tract maintenance costs listed below shall be 100%funded by the BP PS project in perpetuity. The service and maintenance cost shall be funded through a Home Owners Association established by the developer subject to City approval. The Home Owners Association must be in place prior to, or concurrently with acceptance of any final ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning Services BL:Business BS:Building Services The Vi//age at Oakhaven License FD:Fire Department GP:Grading Permit PD:Police Department BP:Building Permit CE:City Engineer FI:Final Inspection WW:Wastewater ZCH 2005-0101, CUP 2005-0157, TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary CA:City Attomey Occupancy FO:Final Occupancy maps. The Home Owners Association shall be approved by the City Attorney, City Engineer and Administrative Services Director prior to acceptance of any Final Map. The administration of the above mentioned funds, and the coordination and performance of maintenance activities, shall be the responsibility of the Home Owners Association. a) All streets, bridges, sidewalks, streetlights, street signs, roads, emergency access roads, emergency access gates, and sewer mains within the project. b) All parks, trails, recreational facilities and like facilities. c) All open space and native tree preservation areas. d) All drainage facilities and detention basins. e) All creeks, flood plains, floodways, wetlands, and riparian habitat areas. f) All common landscaping areas, street trees, medians, parkway planters, manufactured slopes outside private yards, and other similar facilities. g) All frontage landscaping and sidewalks along arterial streets 20. Prior to final map recordation, the applicant shall submit CC&Rs for BP PS, BS review and approval by the Community Development Department. The CC&R's shall record with the Final Map and shall include the following: i. Provisions for maintenance of all common areas including access, parking, street trees, fencing and landscaping in perpetuity. ii. A detailed list of each individual homeowner's responsibilities for maintenance of the individual units. iii. Residents shall keep all trash receptacles within the unit's designated trash storage area. iv. Garages shall be maintained and used for vehicle parking. V. No boats, RV's or other type of recreation vehicle may occupy a guest or resident parking space, including within an individual garage. vi. A provision for review and approval by the City Community Development Department for any changes to the CC&R's that relate to the above requirements prior to the changes ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning Services BL:Business BS:Building Services The Vi//age at Oakhaven License FD:Fire Department GP:Grading Permit PD:Police Department BP:Building Permit CE:City Engineer FI:Final Inspection WW:Wastewater ZCH 2005-0101, CUP 2005-0157, TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary CA:City Attomey Occupancy FO:Final Occupancy being recorded or taking effect. vii. No parking shall be allowed on a driveway that is less 18- feet in length. 21. Approval of this permit shall include the removal of 4 Native Trees, BP PS, BS totaling 76 inches dbh. The applicant shall be required to pay mitigation fees or provide replantings on-site per the requirements of the Atascadero Native Tree Ordinance. Any additional removals shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. 22. The applicant shall work with staff to enhance the architecture of the rear elevations for the units facing EI Camino Real 23. Driveway lengths for residential units shall be a minimum of 18-feet BP PS, BS in length to meet on-site parking requirements. Driveways than cannot meet this standard shall be no longer than 10-feet in length to prevent driveway parking and additional parking shall be found on- site. 24. A minimum of Eight (88) common area parking spots shall utilize BP PS, BS porous paving, grasscrete or other pervious surface that are adjacent to the drip line of a native tree as approved by the City Engineer to accommodate parking as shown in Exhibit Q.Additional shared parking may utilize pervious surfaces to reduce storm water runoff as approved by Planning Staff and City Engineer. 25. Additional landscaping be utilized for the units when facing a public BP PS, BS street to soften the appearance of a"blank"fagade.This landscaping shall be approved by Staff as a part of the Subdivision Improvement Plan. 26. Final Map shall be consistent with the lot line layout and common FM PS, BS open spaces areas as amended by the Master Plan of Development. 27. Entry Feature and signage shall be consistent with materials and BP PS, BS colors as approved within the master plan of development. Entry feature shall be approved by Staff and will require a building permit. 28. A deed notification shall be recorded as a part of the issuance of BP PS building permits notifying Lots 24,25 and 26 that adjacent single family residential has, by right, the ability to keep and raise farm animals, consistent with the City's Municipal Code. Language shall be submitted for this deed notification and shall be approved by staff prior to recordation. City Engineer Conditions ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning Services BL:Business BS:Building Services The Vi//age at Oakhaven License FD:Fire Department GP:Grading Permit PD:Police Department BP:Building Permit CE:City Engineer FI:Final Inspection WW:Wastewater ZCH 2005-0101, CUP 2005-0157, TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary CA:City Attomey Occupancy FO:Final Occupancy PROJECT SPECIFIC CONDITIONS Drainage: 29. Obtain approval by the City Engineer of the grading &drainage plan BP,GP CE and the storm drain design&facilities. 30. Submit calculations to support the design of any structures or pipes. BP,GP CE Closed conduits shall be designed to convey the 10-year flow with gravity flow, the 25-year flow with head, and provide safe conveyance for the 100 year overflow. 31. Provide for the detention of the 50 year developed storm runoff, BP,GP CE while metering out the 2 year undeveloped storm runoff. Metered runoff must follow existing drainage patterns. 32. Show the method of dispersal at all pipe outlets. Include BP,GP CE specifications for size & type. Drainage calculations must show where water flows offsite, and analyze downstream facilities to ensure adequate capacity. 33. Acquire drainage easements where needed. Drainage shall cross lot BP,GP CE lines only where a drainage easement has been provided. 34. Concentrated drainage from off-site areas shall be conveyed across BP,GP CE the project site in drainage easements.Acquire drainage easements where needed. Drainage shall cross lot lines only where a drainage easement has been provided. If drainage easement cannot be obtained the storm water release must follow the exact historic path, rate and velocity as prior to the subdivision. Public Improvements and Maintenance: 35. The applicant shall work with the City Engineer to verify adequate sight distance at the project entry/exit. ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning Services BL:Business BS:Building Services The Vi//age at Oakhaven License FD:Fire Department GP:Grading Permit PD:Police Department BP:Building Permit CE:City Engineer FI:Final Inspection WW:Wastewater ZCH 2005-0101, CUP 2005-0157, TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary CA:City Attomey Occupancy FO:Final Occupancy 36. The applicant must provide for the repair and maintenance of on-site FM CE shared improvements.This includes roads,sidewalks,street trees, streetlights, private sewer system,drainage facilities, recreation areas and common landscaping.The two methods that may be used are: a. Homeowners Association.This private organization would be responsible for the maintenance, repair and replacement of the facilities. b.Assessment District and Landscape and Lighting District. Funds for the maintenance, repair and replacement of the facilities would be collected on the property tax bill and distributed to the City. The final form shall be acceptable to the City Engineer and City Attorney shall appr4eye the final form prior to map recordation. 37. All public improvements shall be constructed in conformance with BP,GP CE the City of Atascadero Engineering Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or as directed by the City Engineer. 38. The grade lines and location of fGr all public improvements shown on BP,GP CE the tentative map may be subject to change or adjustment by the City Engineer 39. Construction plans shall include plan and profile of sanitary sewer, BP,GP CE storm drain lines,and waterlines. 40. Full frontage improvements are required with this development. BP,GP CE These include curb, gutter, sidewalk and street pave out. Public Improvement plans shall be submitted detailing the design. Final alignment and configuration of EI Camino Real shall be determined by the City Engineer. This may require reconfiguration of roadway to allow for parking, bicycle lanes,and/or turn lanes. 41. All handicap ramps shall be constructed to current accessibility/ADA BP,GP CE requirements. , iRG1161diRg+ho„ of+r Innoforl.dnmo6 42. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a BP,GP CE grading and drainage plan with a separate sheet(s) devoted to sedimentation and erosion control, prepared by a registered civil engineer for review and approval by the City Engineer. The owner shall develop Storm water Pollution Prevention Plan and comply with the latest Statewide Construction Storm water Permit. A SWPPP shall be provided to the City prior to building permit issuance. SANITARY SEWER CONDITIONS ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning Services BL:Business BS:Building Services The Vi//age at Oakhaven License FD:Fire Department GP:Grading Permit PD:Police Department BP:Building Permit CE:City Engineer FI:Final Inspection WW:Wastewater ZCH 2005-0101, CUP 2005-0157, TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary CA:City Attomey Occupancy FO:Final Occupancy 43. The Public Works Department shall approve all wastewater facilities BP,GP CE facility prior to construction. This includes pumps, gravity and force mains,cleanouts, manholes and connections. 44. Applicant shall pay all applicable sewer eXteRSinn (aFlRexatinn`fees BP,GP CE upon issuance of building permits. Roimb,-roomont foo;droll he payable upon act,sol rAnnertinn of fho building sewer to the p phGn sewer system 45. Gravity mains and other sewer facilities within the subdivision shall BP,GP CE be privately owned and maintained. 46. Gravity mains within the subdivision shall be eight (8) inches in BP,GP CE diameter. 47. Gravity mains onsite shall end in a manhole. BP,GP CE STANDARD CONDITIONS 48. All public improvements shall be constructed in conformance with BP,GP CE the City of Atascadero Engineering Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or as directed by the City Engineer. 49. In the event that the applicant is allowed to bond for the public FM CE improvements required as a condition of this map,the applicant shall enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City Council. 50. An engineer's estimate of probable cost shall be submitted for review FM CE and approval by the City Engineer to determine the amount of the bond. 51. The Subdivision Improvement Agreement shall record concurrently FM CE with the Final Map. 52. The applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and/or alteration BP,GP CE of existing utilities. 53. The applicant shall install all new utilities (water, gas, electric, cable BP,GP CE TV and telephone) underground. Utilities shall be extended to the property line frontage of each lot or its public utility easement. 54. The applicant shall monument all property corners as required by the FM CE Subdivision Map Act and for construction control. and Property Corners shall promptly replace them if disturbed. 55. The applicant shall acquire title interest in any off-site land that may FM CE be required to allow for the construction of the improvements. The applicant shall bear all costs associated with the necessary acquisitions. The applicant shall also gain concurrence from all ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning Services BL:Business BS:Building Services The Vi//age at Oakhaven License FD:Fire Department GP:Grading Permit PD:Police Department BP:Building Permit CE:City Engineer FI:Final Inspection WW:Wastewater ZCH 2005-0101, CUP 2005-0157, TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary CA:City Attomey Occupancy F0:Final Occupancy adjacent property owners whose ingress and egress is affected by these improvements. 56. Slope easements shall be provided as needed to accommodate cut FM CE of fill slopes. 57. Drainage easements shall be provided as needed to accommodate FM CE both public and private drainage facilities. 58. The final map shall be signed by the City Engineer prior to the map FM CE being placed on the agenda for City Council acceptance. 59. Prior to recording the tract map, the applicant shall submit a map FM CE drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein. The map shall be submitted for review and approval by the City in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 60. Prior to recording the tract map, the applicant shall set monuments FM CE at all new property corners. A registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate by certificate on the parcel map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. 61. Prior to recording the map, the applicant shall complete all FM CE improvements required by these conditions of approval or provide adequate bonds per the requirements of the Atascadero Municipal Code and Subdivision Map Act. 62. Prior to recording the tract map, the applicant shall have the map FM CE reviewed by all applicable public and private utility companies(cable, telephone, gas, electric, Atascadero Mutual Water Company). The applicant shall obtain a letter from each utility company indicating their review of the map. The letter shall identify any new easements that may be required by the utility company. A copy of the letter shall be submitted to the City. New easements shall be shown on the map. 63. Upon recording the final map, the applicant shall provide the City FM CE with a blaGk liRe Glear Mylar(9.4 Mil)Gepy and a blue IiRe PFORt ef the FeGerded map. PDF format electronic copy on CD ROM or DVD ROM. 64. Prior to the final inspection of any public improvements,the applicant FM CE shall submit a written statement from a registered civil engineer that all work has been completed and is in full compliance with the approved plans. 65. Prior to the final inspection, the applicant shall submit a written BP,GP CE certification from a registered civil engineer or land surveyor that all ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning Services BL:Business BS:Building Services The Vi//age at Oakhaven License FD:Fire Department GP:Grading Permit PD:Police Department BP:Building Permit CE:City Engineer FI:Final Inspection WW:Wastewater ZCH 2005-0101, CUP 2005-0157, TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary CA:City Attomey Occupancy FO:Final Occupancy survey monuments have been set as shown on the final map. 66. An encroachment permit shall be obtained prior to any work within BP,GP CE City rights of way. 67. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall submit a BP,GP CE grading and drainage plan prepared by a registered civil engineer for review and approval by the City Engineer. Atascadero Mutual Water Company 68. Before the issuance of building permits,the applicant shall submit plans to AMWC for the water distribution facilities needed to serve the project. AMWC shall review and approve the plans before construction begins on the water system improvements. All water distribution facilities shall be constructed in conformance with AMWC Standards and Details and the California Waterworks Standards (Code of Regulations Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 16). All cross-connection devices shall conform to AWWA and California Department of Health Services standards. 69. Before the start of construction on the water system improvements,the applicant shall pay all installation and connection fees required by AMWC. Subject to the approval of AMWC,the applicant may enter in to a"deferred connection" agreement. 70. Before issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain a "Will Serve"letter from AMWC for the newly created lots within the subdivision. 71. The applicant shall provide AMWC with easements for those water facilities proposed for operation and maintenance by AMWC that are constructed outside of publicly maintained right-of-ways. AMWC shall review the form and content of the easements before recordation. 72. The water mains required to serve the project shall be laid out in a grid or looped pattern and shall connect to the existing water mains system in EI Camino Real at two points of connection. 73. The applicant shall provide AMWC with easements for those water facilities proposed for operation and maintenance by AMWC that are constructed outside of publicly maintained right-of-ways. AMWC shall review the form and content of the easements before recordation. ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning Services BL:Business BS:Building Services The Vi//age at Oakhaven License FD:Fire Department GP:Grading Permit PD:Police Department BP:Building Permit CE:City Engineer FI:Final Inspection WW:Wastewater ZCH 2005-0101, CUP 2005-0157, TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary CA:City Attomey Occupancy FO:Final Occupancy 74. The applicant shall submit a hydraulic analysis to AWMC for the water system improvements for the project. The analysis should take into account the fire flows required by the California Building Code and/or Fire Code and requirements of the California Waterworks Standards. The applicant is responsible for designing and constructing water system improvements that will provide water at pressures and flows adequate for the domestic and fire protection needs of the project 75. The applicant is responsible for designing and constructing water system improvements that will provide water at pressures and flows adequate for the domestic and fire protection needs of the project. 76. The applicant shall obtain a separate landscape-irrigation meter from AMWC for the common areas within the project. 77. Before construction of the water system improvements,AMWC shall review and approve the landscape plans for the common areas within the project.The landscape plan submittal shall incorporate the following ■ Plant list w/ Water Use Classification of Landscape Species (WUCOLS) rating specified. Preference shall be given to plants with very low(VL)and low(L)WUCOLS ratings. ■ Justification for use of plants with WUCOLS rating of M or greater. ■ Total landscaped area including hardscapes (patios, walks & decks) and planted areas and excluding sidewalks, driveways, streets or parking. ■ The size and shape of turf areas shall promote for efficient irrigation shall be no less than 8-feet wide. Turf type shall be warm-season grasses. Turf areas shall be kept to a minimum and shall be limited to functional areas only. A goal of the landscape design should be a total turf area of no more than 10%of the total landscaped area 78. Before construction of the water system improvements,AMWC shall review and approve the irrigation plans for the common areas within the project. The irrigation plan submittal shall include the following ■ Landscape irrigation meter location and size. ■ Backflow prevention device type, location, and manufacturer ■ Flow and precipitation rate for each circuit ■ Irrigation schedules including schedules for establishment period and post establishment period ■ Total anticipated water application per circuit per month for both schedules ■ Total landscape water application. ■ Use drip irrigation where ever possible ■ A check valve shall be installed on the lowest head in each sprinkler circuit ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning Services BL:Business BS:Building Services The Vi//age at Oakhaven License FD:Fire Department GP:Grading Permit PD:Police Department BP:Building Permit CE:City Engineer FI:Final Inspection WW:Wastewater ZCH 2005-0101, CUP 2005-0157, TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary CA:City Attomey Occupancy FO:Final Occupancy Atascadero Fire Department 79. Internal prosect roadway width and turning radius shall comply with GP,BP FD City Ladder Truck turning radius standards. Subdivision Improvement Plans shall not be issued without department approval of the circulation system. 80. "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" signs or red painted curbing shall be BP,FL FD placed in required locations as determined and approved by the Fire Department. 81. All fire hydrant locations must be approved by the Fire Marshal BP,FL FD Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure 1.c.1:The project shall maintain a minimum 35-foot setback B PS 1.c.1 from the eastern property line.A mi9nimum 10-foot wide landscape buffer shall be P installed by the developer prior to final and a deed restriction shall be recorded against parcel 24, 25, and 26 requiring continued maintenance of the landscape buffer.The buffer area shall include evergreen screen trees such as live oaks and/or cedars. Mitigation Measure 1.d.1: All lighting shall be designed to eliminate any off site B PS 1.d.1 glare. All exterior site lights shall utilize full cut-off, "hooded"lighting fixtures to P prevent offsite light spillage and glare. Any luminaire pole height shall not exceed 14-feet in height, limit intensity to 2.0 foot candles at ingress/egress, and otherwise 0.6 foot candle minimum to 1.0 maximum in parking areas. Fixtures shall be shield cut-off type. Mitigation Measure 3.b.1: The project shall be conditioned to comply with all B BS 3.b.1 applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust(PM-10)as P contained in the ApFil 2003 latest Air Quality Handbook. ■ Asbestos has been identified by the state Air Resources Board as a toxic air contaminant. Serpentine and ultramafic rocks are very common in the state and may contain naturally occurring asbestos. Under the State Air Resources Board Air Toxics Control Measure (ATCM)for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations, prior to any grading activities at the site,the project proponent shall ensure that a geologic evaluation is conducted to determine if naturally occurring asbestos is present within the area that will be disturbed. If Naturally Occurring Asbestos(NOA)is found at the site the applicant must comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations. . If NOA is not present, an exemption request must be filed with the District. If NOA is found at the site the applicant must comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM. This may include development of an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan and an Asbestos Health and Safety Program for approval by the APCD. Should Naturally Occurring Asbestos be identified within the area of construction, and the worked area will be less than orequal to one acre, ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning Services BL:Business BS:Building Services The Vi//age at Oakhaven License FD:Fire Department GP:Grading Permit PD:Police Department BP:Building Permit CE:City Engineer FI:Final Inspection WW:Wastewater ZCH 2005-0101, CUP 2005-0157, TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary CA:City Attomey Occupancy FO:Final Occupancy then the dust control measures identified below are required. If the disturbed area is greater than one acre, additional requirements may include but are not limited to 1)an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan which must be approved by the District before construction begins, and 2)an Asbestos Health and Safety Program will also be required for some projects. ■ Dust Control Measures for Construction and Grading Operation Projects One Acre or Less: No person shall engage in any construction or grading operation on property where the area to be disturbed is one(1.0)acre or less unless all of the following dust mitigation measures are initiated at the start and maintained throughout the duration of the construction or grading activity: (A)Construction vehicle speed at the work site must be limited to fifteen(15)miles per hour or less; (B)Prior to any ground disturbance, sufficient water must be applied to the area to be disturbed to prevent visible emissions from crossing the property line; (C)Areas to be graded or excavated must be kept adequately wetted to prevent visible emissions from crossing the property line; (D)Storage piles must be kept adequately wetted,treated with a chemical dust suppressant, or covered when material is not being added to or removed from the pile; (E)Equipment must be washed down before moving from the property onto a paved public road; and (F)Visible track-out on the paved public road must be cleaned using wet sweeping or a HEPA filter equipped vacuum device within twenty- four 24 hours Mitigation Measure 3.b.1: Naturally Occurring Asbestos(NOA)has been identified B PS 3.b.1 by the state Air Resources Board as a toxic air contaminant. Serpentine and P ultramafic rocks are very common in the state and may contain naturally occurring asbestos. Under the State Air Resources Board Air Toxics Control Measure (ATCM)for Construction, Grading, Quarrying,and Surface Mining Operations, prior to any grading activities at the site,the project proponent shall ensure that a geologic evaluation is conducted to determine if naturally occurring asbestos is present within the area that will be disturbed. If naturally occurring asbestos is found at the site the applicant must comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations. These requirements may include but are not limited to 1)an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan which must be approved by the District before construction begins, and 2)an Asbestos Health and Safety Program will also be required for some projects. Mitigation Measure 4.e.1: The Grading Plan shall identify tree protection fencing B PS 4.e.1 around the drip line, or as recommended by the project arborist, of each existing P on-site or off-site native tree. ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning Services BL:Business BS:Building Services The Vi//age at Oakhaven License FD:Fire Department GP:Grading Permit PD:Police Department BP:Building Permit CE:City Engineer FI:Final Inspection WW:Wastewater ZCH 2005-0101, CUP 2005-0157, TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary CA:City Attomey Occupancy FO:Final Occupancy Mitigation Measure 4.e.2: Grading and excavation and grading work shall be G PS 4.e.2 consistent with the City of Atascadero Tree Ordinance. Special precautions when P working around native trees include: 1. All existing trees outside of the limits of work shall remain. 2. Earthwork shall not exceed the limits of the project area. 3. Low branches in danger of being torn from trees shall be pruned prior to any heavy equipment work being done. 4. Vehicles and stockpiled material shall be stored outside the drip line of all trees. 5. All trees within the area of work shall be fenced for protection with 4-foot chain link,snow or safety fencing placed per the approved tree protection plan. Tree protection fencing shall be in place prior to any site excavation or grading. Fencing shall remain in place until completion of all construction activities. 6. Any roots that are encountered during excavation shall be clean cut by hand and sealed with an approved tree seal. ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning Services BL:Business BS:Building Services The Vi//age at Oakhaven License FD:Fire Department GP:Grading Permit PD:Police Department BP:Building Permit CE:City Engineer FI:Final Inspection WW:Wastewater ZCH 2005-0101, CUP 2005-0157, TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary CA:City Attomey Occupancy FO:Final Occupancy Mitigation Measure 4.e.3: The developer shall contract with a certified arborist G PS 4.e.3 during all phases of project implementation. The certified arborists shall be P responsible for monitoring the project during all phases of construction through project completion,as follows: (a) A written agreement between the arborist and the developer outlining an arborist monitoring schedule for each construction phase through final inspection shall be submitted to and approved by planning staff prior to the issuance of building/grading permits. (b) Arborist shall schedule a pre-construction meeting with engineering/planning staff,grading equipment operators, project superintendent to review the project conditions and requirements prior to any grubbing or earth work for any portion of the project site. All tree protection fencing and trunk protection shall be installed for inspection during the meeting. Tree protection fencing shall be installed at the line of encroachment into the tree's root zone area. (c) As specified by the arborist report and City staff: ■ Prune all trees in active development areas to be saved for structural strength and crown cleaning by a licensed and certified arborist; ■ Remove all debris and spoils from the lot cleaning and tree pruning. ■ In locations where paving is to occur within the tree canopy, grub only and do not grade nor compact. Install porous pavers over a three-inch bed of '/inch granite covered with one-inch pea gravel for screeding. If curbs are required, use pegged curbs to secure the porous pavers. Pegged curbs are reinforced six to eight curbs poured at grade with a one-foot by one-foot pothole every four to six linear feet. ■ All trenching or grading within the protected root zone area, outside of the tree protection fence shall require hand trenching or preserve and protect roots that are larger than 2 inches in diameter. ■ No grading or trenching is allowed within the fenced protected area. ■ Any roots that are 4 inches in diameter or larger are not to be cut until inspected and approved by the on-site arborist. (d) Upon project completion and prior to final occupancy a final status report shall be prepared by the project arborist certifying that the tree protection plan was implemented, the trees designated for protection were protected during construction, and the construction-related tree protection measures are no longer required for tree protection. Mitigation Measure 5.b.1: Should any cultural resources be unearthed during site G PS,BS development work,the provisions of CEQA-Section 15064.5,will be followed to P reduce impacts to a non-significant level. B P Mitigation Measure 6.b: The grading permit application plans shall include G CE 6.b erosion control measures to prevent soil,dirt, and debris from entering the storm P drain system during and after construction. A separate plan shall be submitted for this purpose and shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer at the time of Building Permit application. (See section 8 of the document). ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure PS:Planning Services BL:Business BS:Building Services The Vi//age at Oakhaven License FD:Fire Department GP:Grading Permit PD:Police Department BP:Building Permit CE:City Engineer FI:Final Inspection WW:Wastewater ZCH 2005-0101, CUP 2005-0157, TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary CA:City Attomey Occupancy FO:Final Occupancy Mitigation Measure 6.c.d: A soils report shall be required to be submitted with a G BS 6.c.d future building permit by the building department.The building plans will be P required to follow the recommendations of the soils report to assure safety for residents and buildings. Mitigation Measure 8e.f.1: Storm water Pollution Prevention Plan B CE 8.e.f (SWPPP)/Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted and approved by the City P Engineer prior to the issuance of the building permit. The plan shall include storm water measures for the operation and maintenance of the project for the review and approval of the City Engineer. The Building Permit application plans shall identify Best Management Practices (BMPs)appropriate to the uses conducted on site that effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants into storm water runoff. Mitigation Measure 8.e.f.2: The developer is responsible for ensuring that all B BS,PS,CE 8.ef.2 contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such measures P are implemented. Failure to comply with the approved construction Best Management Practices will result in the issuance of correction notices,citations, or stop work orders. Mitigation Measure 11.d: All construction activities shall comply with the City of 0 BVIRS 11.d Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours of operation. n 9 0 i n 9 Mitigation Measure 15.a.b.1: Full frontage improvements shall be required along EI B BS,PS 15.a.b.1 Camino Real. Internal project circulation shall be designed to enhance flow and P minimize traffic conflicts by implementing traffic calming measures and utilizing one-way streets as appropriate and as approved by the Community Development Director. Mitigation Measure 15.c.1: The Contractor shall maintain one lane for traffic at all 0 BS,PS 15.c.1 times. Traffic control shall be in accordance with the current Caltrans manual for n traffic control and work area traffic control handbook. No street or lane closures 9 shall be permitted unless previously arranged for and granted by the City 0 Engineering Department. n n 9 ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT B: Master Plan of Development/Site Plan-2012 Amendment or • •• •••. •`moi• • • _•� 11 I'IJn `later flan tot of-velop -nt ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT B: Master Plan of Development/Site Plan-2012 Amendment � r � 1 r j 4 ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT C: Floor Plan A-2012 Amendment I I 1 i I 1 I 10.. ��.�,.. t.nug �•. L �i�nnn.11� flan;\ it ar.+to su I I I � I I I I I i.�dinn i'�lnV L- - — � - - — J L Ist Flaw Znd Floor 3rd Fltxsr Plan A-Floor ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT C: Floor Plan A-2012 Amendment rrl Wu.i. waw 01- WAD 4OL- ". PLOLV WRDCR SFR PLAN "A" rt,I AL L ON 1)]L I L)N Ell AREA- Sr ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT D: Floor Plan A Sections and Elevations-2012 Amendment Lf FA b ♦ a nr u..� 7� 'F'ti,tl liutl.lin:ti c• ttonn I l lc � ,ili. ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT D: Floor Plan A Sections and Elevations-2012 Amendment WrAR KI Ak RiAk r.nnw� r.•r.na ...n rw.n.v SOIEMB A] SCREW A•2 904EME A3 SM PLANA'CDLM SO C MES See File for 'Building Elevations' ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT E: Floor Plan B-2012 Amendment A, IL I , 1st Floor <nJ tlxr W-4 tir. Plan 13 - Fluor Pla ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT E: Floor Plan B-2012 Amendment •v IIK 8 =MIA 6r L SFR PLAN„B" ,rLWhL cLmufrKxkD A 7F A i gmtW ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT F: Floor Plan B Sections and Elevations-2012 Amendment • 1 u�Ilk Plan B - Eleva tloiis RM i M i M; '-Ick wl ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT F: Floor Plan B Sections and Elevations-2012 Amendment r - - T—"t all ig mlqql i-. i +- SCHEME B-I %MIME B-2 WHEME B-; ScmmE h7 CN`ION 2 SFA PIAN'B'CXXOR SMEMM The use of river rock base is an additional option as approved by the Planning Commission. See File for 'Building Elevations' ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT G: Floor Plan C-2012 Amendment I I 1 � f I I I 1'1,711 C - Hot 1'1�� ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT G: Floor Plan C-2012 Amendment T1 x - ... raw SFR PLAN "C" TMALCK*4�, 'ED AZEA-LEA Sf- ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT H: Floor Plan C Sections and Elevations-2012 Amendment r IL 1 e _ t _ Real i Plan C - Elevations & Building Sectioi . ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT H: Floor Plan C Sections and Elevations-2012 Amendment L� IL 11 f— 4 FRn�Cf FRO17 .aa,r 1 •lV -� M -a-M11LttV IIL� •••• •.v. rwrU.rvr�wt Rw`7WY'a.�.:•.i .'� .. ►w.YfaNAYiV�11�W MR %THEME C I REAR SCHEME C-2 SFR PLAN V COLDR SCI IE.NES Jk�`7�A47AC3TY:Z1tFL.. RP.AR SCHLW C•] See File for 'Building Elevations' ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT 1: Floor Plan D-2012 Amendment y .• l SFR PLA "M ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT J: Floor Plan D Sections and Elevations-2012 Amendment k 9 FROK I' 17YD � r REAR :.v.I NLVRY�tTVV 41AMI $63.MKIT �[iY[1L�D.- 1T{aT�MOtIH SCHEME D-3 MK MA\ SFR PLAN"D'COLOR SC14EME ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT L: Project Site Sections and Entry-2012 Amendment `F -Jrit r 100" ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT L: Project Site Sections and Entry-2012 Amendment � `'l rr ! M v`1 J`- r� r Cy_ ry r V r+- Project signage shall Landscaping to be be consistent with consistent with residential materials approved landscaping and colors plan ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT-M: Preliminary Landscape Plan-2012 Amendment 1 1 x nerd Y w i L ur l4•nFr I 1(mrs wM.wl un r.",*N ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT-M: Preliminary Landscape Plan-2012 Amendment 41 13 rte,_ r.. HEM�y� IMMf M�. •.�i tib_.• �.w w_ . V� f}yyJ .��r.ti�w.ai��. riu•+irw.�i«nw�:Mr....iia Nw Tyr""low 4 Who Mq IAMDOCAIt �•a iD ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT N:Tree Protection Plan 4 Ali if IT-ff- 7,Tf WTIF6 ` 035 _ I A & T ARBORISTS P.O. BOX 1311 TEMPLETON, CA 93465 (805)4340131 11-29-12 Dan Silverio Cc Alfredo Castillo Re Oakhaven additional parking spaces We reviewed the additional parking spaces that are planned to be added to the Oakhaven project_ We feel the construction of these spaces will not cause any long term impacts to the native oaks as long as the following mitigation measures are followed: • The existing grade may not be lowered more than six inches before base is applied. • Asphalt is preferred for the curbing rather than concrete as it won't require a footing • We will need to monitor during the grading for the spaces under the drip lines. Please let us know if there are any questions Chip Tamagni Certified Arborist#WE 6436-A ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT O=Grading, Drainage and Utility Plan W CL > Z $ z J N Hi i Lj z � 9 O >Imi.4 - ..ate"WON Orr { *l 1 ••�;=; ��-� '^ is �,.`� r'r� � �� �� • -__ +_-" _ '-tyre. I Grading/Drainage/Utilities Shall be consistent with approved site plan layout in Exhibit B ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT O: Grading, Drainage and Utility Plan Grading/Drainage/Utilities Shall be consistent with approved site plan layout in Exhibit B R � _> rL F- b ft- g < til I1� — Er ZCO Uj N s Z � ►_ �'15 C b n ,I•j yl > �1 �I lit • f' � I ��. w w 12 ON ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT P:Approved Street Sections APPROVED STREET SECTIONS TRACT 2614.OAK HAVEN ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 EXHIBIT Q: Proposed Circulation Layout i ::7' • r ••� a Lr �• Proposed one-way 1. �• ` street 1 1 a 1 !• �. '� �. Common area parking to utilize �' ,• ... permeable surface ' s• ..7 41 s a All streets to be two-way with exception of noted street ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 6: Draft Resolution B Denying the applicant's appeal and amend Condition 11 of City Council Resolution 2005-077 (VTTM) DRAFT RESOLUTION B RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DENYING APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2007-0157 AND AMENDING CONDITION 11 OF CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2005-077, VESTING TENATIVE TRACT MAP, DUE TO A CLERICAL ERROR APN 049-042-018 1155 EL CAMINO REAL (OAKHAVEN VILLAGE, LLC) WHEREAS, an application has been received Oakhaven Village, LLC, 3160 Ocean Terrace, Marina, CA 93933, (Owner and Applicant) to consider an appeal to Conditional Use Permit 2005-0157 at 1155 El Camino Real (APN 049-042-018), condition 14 that requires that the developer set aside 30 year deed restricted affordable housing units for two (2) very low, five (5) low, and five (5) moderate income throughout the development at 1155 El Camino Real (APN 049-042-018); and WHEREAS, the site's current General Plan Designation High Density Residential (HDR); and, WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is Multi-Family Residential (RMF-20) with a Planned Development Overlay(PD-26); and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing on July 19, 2005, the Planning Commission adopted PC 2005-0047 recommending that the City Council approve Conditional Use permit 2005-0157 (Master Plan of Development) and PC 2005-0048 recommending that the City Council approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map 2005-0067 with changes to the conditions of approval that included modifications to the inclusionary housing condition to reflect the inclusion of two (2) very low, five (5) low, and five (5) moderate deed restricted units throughout the development, consistent with the City's Council's Affordable Housing Policy; and, WHEREAS, Staff revised its report to the City Council to reflect the Inclusionary Affordable Housing changes as recommended by the Planning Commission; and, 7 ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 WHEREAS, Staff reported to the City Council that conditions of approval had been added to ensure that this requirement is met(Condition CUP 14, /TTM 11); and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing on August 9, 2005, the City Council, on a 3-0 roll call vote, adopted Resolution 2005-076, Master Plan of Development and Resolution 2005-077, Vesting Tentative Tract Map; and, WHEREAS, it was the intent of the City Council that the project conditions of approval included two (2) very low, five (5) low, and five (5) moderate deed restricted units throughout the development, consistent with the City's Affordable Housing Policy; and, WHEREAS, a clerical error had occurred on City Council Resolution 2005-077 (Vesting Tentative Tract Map), Condition 11 that does not reflect the project conditions as approved by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Conditional Use Permit amendment application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said application; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on December 19, 2012, approved the Conditional Use Permit 2005- 0157, after first studying and considering the testimony and the environmental determination prepared for the project, and, WHEREAS, an appeal of the project was received within the 14 day project appeal period by the project applicant, and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on March 26, 2013, studied and considered the appeal, after first studying and considering the materials prepared for the project, and, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero takes the following actions: SECTION 1. Findings Denying the appeal of Planning Commission's approval of an amendment to Conditional Use Permit 2005-0157. The City Council finds as follows: 1. It was the intent of the Council in 2005 to require two (2) very low, five (5) low, and five (5) moderate deed restricted units be provided as a condition of project approval. SECTION 2. Amendment. The City Council of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on March 26, 2013, resolved to uphold the Planning Commission's approval of an amendment to Conditional Use Permit 2005-0157 and amend Condition of ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Approval #11 of its August 9, 2005 approval of Vesting Tentative Map due to a clerical error consistent with the following: EXHIBIT A: Vesting Tentative Tract Map EXHIBIT B: Amended Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Map On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: Torn O' Malley, Mayor ATTEST: Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Brian Pierik, City Attorney ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Exhibit A:Vesting Tentative Tract Map _ 1! :I .1J. �� � K •I a 1 � i ! all ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Exhibit B: Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring Program Tentative Tract Map 2005-0067 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Permit BS:Building Services The Village at Oakhaven SIP:Subdivision FD:Fire Department Improvement Plans PD:Police Department Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE:City Engineer TO:Temporary WW:Wastewater TTM 2005-0067 Occupancy CA:City Attorney FI:Final inspection AMWC:Water Comp. FO:Final Occupancy Planning Services 1. The approval of this use permit shall become final and effective FM PS for the purposes of issuing building permits thirty(30)days following the City Council approval of ZCH 2005-0099 and ZCH 2005-0101 upon second reading,unless prior to that time,an appeal to the decision is filed as set forth in Section 9- 1.111(b)of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Approval of this Tentative Tract Map shall be valid for two FM PS years after its effective date. At the end of the period, the approval shall expire and become null and void unless an extension of time is granted pursuant to a written request received prior to the expiration date. 3. The Community Development Department shall have the FM PS authority to approve minor changes to the project that(1)result in a superior site design or appearance, and/or (2) address a design issue that is not substantive to the Tentative Tract Map and that the Final Map is in substantial conformance with the Tentative Map. 4. The granting of this entitlement shall apply to the property On going PS located at(APN 049-042-018)regardless of owner. 5. The Final Map shall be drawn in substantial conformance with FM PS the approved tentative map, and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein, shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 6. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the FM PS City of Atascadero or its agents, officers, and employees against any claim or action brought to challenge an approval by the city,or any of its entities,concerning the subdivision. 7. The Tract Map shall be subject to additional fees for park or FM PS recreation purposes (QUIMBY Act) as required by City Ordinance. 8. The emergency services and facility maintenance costs BP PS listed below shall be 100%funded by the project in perpetuity. The service and maintenance costs shall be funded through a community facilities district established by the City at the developer's cost. The funding mechanism must be in place prior to or concurrently with acceptance of ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Permit BS:Building Services The Village at Oakhaven SIP:Subdivision FD:Fire Department Improvement Plans PD:Police Department Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE:City Engineer TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary WW:Wastewater Occupancy CA:City Attorney FI:Final inspection AMWC:Water Comp. F0:Final Occupancy the final maps. The funding mechanism shall be approved by the City Attorney, City Engineer and Administrative Services Director prior to acceptance of any final map. The administration of the above mentioned funds shall be by the City. Developer agrees to participate in the community facilities district and to take all steps reasonably required by the City with regard to the establishment of the district and assessment of the property. ■ All Atascadero Police Department service costs to the project. ■ All Atascadero Fire Department service costs to the project. ■ Off-site common City of Atascadero park facilities maintenance service costs related to the project. 9. All tract maintenance costs listed below shall be 100%funded BP PS by the project in perpetuity. The service and maintenance cost shall be funded through a Home Owners Association established by the developer subject to City approval. The Home Owners Association must be in place prior to, or concurrently with acceptance of any final maps. The Home Owners Association shall be approved by the City Attorney, City Engineer and Administrative Services Director prior to acceptance of any Final Map. The administration of the above mentioned funds, and the coordination and performance of maintenance activities, shall be the responsibility of the Home Owners Association. ■ All streets, bridges, sidewalks, streetlights, street signs, roads, emergency access roads, emergency access gates,and sewer mains within the project. ■ All parks, trails, recreational facilities and like facilities. ■ All open space and native tree preservation areas. ■ All drainage facilities and detention basins. ■ All creeks, flood plains, floodways, wetlands, and riparian habitat areas. ■ All common landscaping areas, street trees, medians, parkway planters, manufactured slopes outside private yards, and other similar facilities. ■ All frontage landscaping and sidewalks along arterial streets ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Permit BS:Building Services The Village at Oakhaven SIP:Subdivision FD:Fire Department Improvement Plans PD:Police Department Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE:City Engineer TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary WW:Wastewater Occupancy CA:City Attorney FI:Final inspection AMWC:Water Comp. F0:Final Occupancy 10. Prior to final map,the applicant shall submit CC&Rs for review BP PS and approval by the Community Development Department. The CC&R's shall record with the Final Map and shall include the following: a) Provisions for maintenance of all common areas including access, parking, street trees, fencing and landscaping in perpetuity. b) A detailed list of each individual homeowner's responsibilities for maintenance of the individual units. c) Residents shall keep all trash receptacles within the unit's designated trash storage area. d) Garages shall be maintained and used for vehicle parking. e) No boats, RV's or other type of recreation vehicle may occupy a guest or resident parking space, including within an individual garage. f) A provision for review and approval by the City Community Development Department for any changes to the CC&R's that relate to the above requirements prior to the changes being recorded or taking effect. 11. Affordable Housing Requirement: The applicant shall deed GP/BP PS,CA restrict a minimum of 12 residential units for 30 years,prior to or concurrently with the final map.The income restrictions shall be as follows: ■ 2 very-low income units ■ 5 low-income units ■ 5 moderate income units All units shall be distributed throughout the project,subject to staff approval 12. Workforce Housing: Prior to recordation of final map,the BP PS,CA applicant shall enter into a legal agreement with the City to reserve 1/2 of the units for sale to residents or workers within the City of Atascadero, including the affordable units. The agreement shall include the following provisions: ■ The units shall be offered for sale to residents or workers within the City of Atascadero for a minimum of 60-days. During this time period offers may only be accepted from ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Permit BS:Building Services The Village at Oakhaven SIP:Subdivision FD:Fire Department Improvement Plans PD:Police Department Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE:City Engineer TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary WW:Wastewater Occupancy CA:City Attorney FI:Final inspection AMWC:Water Comp. F0:Final Occupancy Atascadero residents or workers; ■ The applicant shall provide reasonable proof to the City that at least one of the qualified buyers is a resident or worker within the City Limits of Atascadero; ■ The Atascadero resident or worker restriction shall apply to the initial sale only; ■ The applicant shall identify which units will be reserved;and The City Attorney shall approve the final form of the agreement. 13. The developer and/or subsequent owner shall assume Ongoing PS responsibility for the continued maintenance of all landscape and common areas. 14. Deed notification shall be recorded against lots 24,25,and 26 expressing the requirements and maintenance responsibilities of the landscape buffer. City Engineer Conditions PROJECT SPECIFIC CONDITIONS Drainage: 15. Obtain approval by the City Engineer of the grading & BP,GP CE drainage plan and the storm drain design&facilities. 16. Submit calculations to support the design of any BP,GP CE structures or pipes. Closed conduits shall be designed to convey the 10-year flow with gravity flow, the 25-year flow with head, and provide safe conveyance for the 100 year overflow. 17. Provide for the detention of the 50 year developed storm BP,GP CE runoff,while metering out the 2 year undeveloped storm runoff. Metered runoff must follow existing drainage patterns. 18. Show the method of dispersal at all pipe outlets. Include BP,GP CE specifications for size & type. Drainage calculations must show where water flows offsite, and analyze downstream facilities to ensure adequate capacity. 19. Acquire drainage easements where needed. Drainage BP,GP CE shall cross lot lines only where a drainage easement has been provided. ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Permit BS:Building Services The Village at Oakhaven SIP:Subdivision FD:Fire Department Improvement Plans PD:Police Department Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE:City Engineer TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary WW:Wastewater Occupancy CA:City Attorney FI:Final inspection AMWC:Water Comp. F0:Final Occupancy 20. Concentrated drainage from off-site areas shall be BP,GP CE conveyed across the project site in drainage easements. Acquire drainage easements where needed. Drainage shall cross lot lines only where a drainage easement has been provided. If drainage easement can not be obtained the storm water release must follow the exact historic path, rate and velocity as prior to the subdivision. Public Improvements and Maintenance: 21. The applicant must provide for the repair and FM CE maintenance of on-site shared improvements.This includes roads,sidewalks,street trees,streetlights, private sewer system,drainage facilities, recreation areas and common landscaping.The two methods that may be used are: a. Homeowners Association.This private organization would be responsible for the maintenance,repair and replacement of the facilities. b.Assessment District and Landscape and Lighting District. Funds for the maintenance, repair and replacement of the facilities would be collected on the property tax bill and distributed to the City. The City Engineer and City Attorney shall approve the final form prior to recordation. 22. All public improvements shall be constructed in BP,GP CE conformance with the City of Atascadero Engineering Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or as directed by the City Engineer. 23. The grade lines for all improvements shown on the BP,GP CE tentative map may be subject to change or adjustment by the City Engineer 24. Construction plans shall include plan and profile of BP,GP CE sanitary sewer,storm drain lines,and waterlines. 25. Full frontage improvements are required with this BP,GP CE development. These include curb, gutter, sidewalk and paveout. Public Improvement plans shall be submitted detailing the design. Final alignment and configuration of EI Camino Real shall be determined by the City Engineer. This may require reconfiguration of roadway to allow for parking and bicycle lanes. ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Permit BS:Building Services The Village at Oakhaven SIP:Subdivision FD:Fire Department Improvement Plans PD:Police Department Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE:City Engineer TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary WW:Wastewater Occupancy CA:City Attorney FI:Final inspection AMWC:Water Comp. F0:Final Occupancy 26. All handicap ramps shall be constructed to current ADA BP,GP CE requirements, including the use of truncated domes. 27. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall BP,GP CE submit a grading and drainage plan with a separate sheet(s) devoted to sedimentation and erosion control, prepared by a registered civil engineer for review and approval by the City Engineer. SANITARY SEWER CONDITIONS 28. The Public Works Department shall approve all BP,GP CE wastewater facilities prior to construction. This includes pumps, force mains, cleanouts, manholes and connections. 29. Applicant shall pay sewer extension (annexation) fees BP,GP CE upon issuance of building permit. Sewer Connection and Reimbursement fees shall be payable upon actual connection of the building sewer to the public sewer system. 30. Gravity mains and other sewer facilities within the BP,GP CE subdivision shall be privately owned and maintained. 31. Gravity mains within the subdivision shall be eight (8) BP,GP CE inches in diameter. 32. Gravity mains onsite shall end in a manhole. BP,GP CE STANDARD CONDITIONS 33. All public improvements shall be constructed in BP,GP CE conformance with the City of Atascadero Engineering Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or as directed by the City Engineer. 34. In the event that the applicant is allowed to bond for the FM CE public improvements required as a condition of this map, the applicant shall enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City Council. 35. An engineer's estimate of probable cost shall be FM CE submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer to determine the amount of the bond. 36. The Subdivision Improvement Agreement shall record FM CE concurrently with the Final Map. ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Permit BS:Building Services The Village at Oakhaven SIP:Subdivision FD:Fire Department Improvement Plans PD:Police Department Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE:City Engineer TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary WW:Wastewater Occupancy CA:City Attorney FI:Final inspection AMWC:Water Comp. F0:Final Occupancy 37. The applicant shall be responsible for the relocation BP,GP CE and/or alteration of existing utilities. 38. The applicant shall install all new utilities (water, gas, BP,GP CE electric, cable TV and telephone) underground. Utilities shall be extended to the property line frontage of each lot or its public utility easement. 39. The applicant shall monument all property corners for FM CE construction control and shall promptly replace them if disturbed. 40. The applicant shall acquire title interest in any off-site FM CE land that may be required to allow for the construction of the improvements. The applicant shall bear all costs associated with the necessary acquisitions. The applicant shall also gain concurrence from all adjacent property owners whose ingress and egress is affected by these improvements. 41. Slope easements shall be provided as needed to FM CE accommodate cut of fill slopes. 42. Drainage easements shall be provided as needed to FM CE accommodate both public and private drainage facilities. 43. The final map shall be signed by the City Engineer prior FM CE to the map being placed on the agenda for City Council acceptance. 44. Prior to recording the tract map, the applicant shall FM CE submit a map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein. The map shall be submitted for review and approval by the City in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 45. Prior to recording the tract map, the applicant shall set FM CE monuments at all new property corners. A registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate by certificate on the parcel map,that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. 46. Prior to recording the map, the applicant shall complete FM CE all improvements required by these conditions of approval 47. Prior to recording the tract map,the applicant shall have FM CE the map reviewed by all applicable public and private ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Permit BS:Building Services The Village at Oakhaven SIP:Subdivision FD:Fire Department Improvement Plans PD:Police Department Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE:City Engineer TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary WW:Wastewater Occupancy CA:City Attorney FI:Final inspection AMWC:Water Comp. F0:Final Occupancy utility companies (cable, telephone, gas, electric, Atascadero Mutual Water Company). The applicant shall obtain a letter from each utility company indicating their review of the map. The letter shall identify any new easements that may be required by the utility company. A copy of the letter shall be submitted to the City. New easements shall be shown on the map. 48. Upon recording the final map,the applicant shall provide FM CE the City with a black line clear Mylar(0.4 mil)copy and a blue line print of the recorded map. 49. Prior to the final inspection of any public improvements, FM CE the applicant shall submit a written statement from a registered civil engineer that all work has been completed and is in full compliance with the approved plans. 50. Prior to the final inspection, the applicant shall submit a BP,GP CE written certification from a registered civil engineer or land surveyor that all survey monuments have been set as shown on the final map. 51. An encroachment permit shall be obtained prior to any BP,GP CE work within City rights of way. 52. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant BP,GP CE shall submit a grading and drainage plan prepared by a registered civil engineer for review and approval by the City Engineer. Atascadero Mutual Water Company 53. Before the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit plans to AMWC for the water distribution facilities needed to serve the project. AMWC shall review and approve the plans before construction begins on the water system improvements. All water distribution facilities shall be constructed in conformance with AMWC Standards and Details and the California Waterworks Standards(Code of Regulations Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 16). All cross-connection devices shall conform to AWWA and California Department of Health Services standards. 54. Before the start of construction on the water system improvements,the applicant shall pay all installation and connection fees required by AMWC. Subject to the approval of AMWC, the applicant may enter in to a "deferred connection"agreement. ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Permit BS:Building Services The Village at Oakhaven SIP:Subdivision FD:Fire Department Improvement Plans PD:Police Department Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE:City Engineer TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary WW:Wastewater Occupancy CA:City Attorney FI:Final inspection AMWC:Water Comp. F0:Final Occupancy 55. Before issuance of building permits,the applicant shall obtain a"Will Serve" letter from AMWC for the newly created lots within the subdivision. 56. The applicant shall provide AMWC with easements for those water facilities proposed for operation and maintenance by AMWC that are constructed outside of publicly maintained right-of-ways. AMWC shall review the form and content of the easements before recordation. 57. The water mains required to serve the project shall be laid out in a grid or looped pattern and shall connect to the existing water mains system in EI Camino Real at two points of connection. 58. The applicant shall provide AMWC with easements for those water facilities proposed for operation and maintenance by AMWC that are constructed outside of publicly maintained right-of-ways. AMWC shall review the form and content of the easements before recordation. 59. The applicant shall submit a hydraulic analysis to AWMC for the water system improvements for the project. The analysis should take into account the fire flows required by the Uniform Fire Code and requirements of the California Waterworks Standards. The applicant is responsible for designing and constructing water system improvements that will provide water at pressures and flows adequate for the domestic and fire protection needs of the project 60. The applicant is responsible for designing and constructing water system improvements that will provide water at pressures and flows adequate for the domestic and fire protection needs of the project. 61. The applicant shall obtain a separate landscape- irrigation meter from AMWC for the common areas within the project. 62. Before construction of the water system improvements,AMWC shall review and approve the landscape plans for the common areas within the project. The landscape plan submittal shall incorporate the following ■ Plant list w/ Water Use Classification of Landscape Species (WUCOLS) rating specified. Preference shall be given to plants with very low VL and low L ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Permit BS:Building Services The Village at Oakhaven SIP:Subdivision FD:Fire Department Improvement Plans PD:Police Department Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE:City Engineer TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary WW:Wastewater Occupancy CA:City Attorney FI:Final inspection AMWC:Water Comp. F0:Final Occupancy WUCOLS ratings. ■ Justification for use of plants with WUCOLS rating of M or greater. ■ Total landscaped area including hardscapes (patios, walks & decks) and planted areas and excluding sidewalks, driveways, streets or parking. ■ The size and shape of turf areas shall promote for efficient irrigation shall be no less than 8-feet wide. Turf type shall be warm-season grasses. Turf areas shall be kept to a minimum and shall be limited to functional areas only. A goal of the landscape design should be a total turf area of no more than 10% of the total landscaped area 63. Before construction of the water system improvements,AMWC shall review and approve the irrigation plans for the common areas within the project. The irrigation plan submittal shall include the following ■ Landscape irrigation meter location and size. ■ Backflow prevention device type, location, and manufacturer ■ Flow and precipitation rate for each circuit ■ Irrigation schedules including schedules for establishment period and post establishment period ■ Total anticipated water application per circuit per month for both schedules ■ Total landscape water application. ■ Use drip irrigation where ever possible ■ A check valve shall be installed on the lowest head in each sprinkler circuit Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure 1.c.1:The project shall maintain a minimum BP PS 1.c.1 35-foot setback from the eastern property line.A mi9nimum 10- foot wide landscape buffer shall be installed by the developer prior to final and a deed restriction shall be recorded against parcel 24, 25, and 26 requiring continued maintenance of the landscape buffer. The buffer area shall include evergreen screen trees such as live oaks and/or cedars. Mitigation Measure 1.d.1: All lighting shall be designed to BP PS 1.d.1 eliminate any off site glare. All exterior site lights shall utilize full cut-off, "hooded" lighting fixtures to prevent offsite light spillage and glare. Any luminaire pole height shall not exceed 14-feet in height, limit intensity to 2.0 foot candles at ingress/egress, and otherwise 0.6 foot candle minimum to 1.0 maximum in parking areas. Fixtures shall be shield cut-off type. Mitigation Measure 3.b.1: The project shall be conditioned to BP BS 3.b.1 comply with all applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust PM-10 as contained in sections 6.3, 6.4 ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Permit BS:Building Services The Village at Oakhaven SIP:Subdivision FD:Fire Department Improvement Plans PD:Police Department Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE:City Engineer TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary WW:Wastewater Occupancy CA:City Attorney FI:Final inspection AMWC:Water Comp. F0:Final Occupancy and 6.5 of the April 2003 Air Quality Handbook. ■ Asbestos has been identified by the state Air Resources Board as a toxic air contaminant. Serpentine and ultramafic rocks are very common in the state and may contain naturally occurring asbestos. Under the State Air Resources Board Air Toxics Control Measure (ATCM)for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations, prior to any grading activities at the site,the project proponent shall ensure that a geologic evaluation is conducted to determine if naturally occurring asbestos is present within the area that will be disturbed. If Naturally Occurring Asbestos (NOA)is found at the site the applicant must comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations. . If NOA is not present, an exemption request must be filed with the District. If NOA is found at the site the applicant must comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM. This may include development of an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan and an Asbestos Health and Safety Program for approval by the APCD. Should Naturally Occurring Asbestos be identified within the area of construction, and the worked area will be less than or equal to one acre,then the dust control measures identified below are required. If the disturbed area is greater than one acre, additional requirements may include but are not limited to 1)an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan which must be approved by the District before construction begins, and 2)an Asbestos Health and Safety Program will also be required for some projects. ■ Dust Control Measures for Construction and Grading Operation Projects One Acre or Less: No person shall engage in any construction or grading operation on property where the area to be disturbed is one(1.0)acre or less unless all of the following dust mitigation measures are initiated at the start and maintained throughout the duration of the construction or grading activity: (A)Construction vehicle speed at the work site must be limited to fifteen(15)miles per hour or less; (B)Prior to any ground disturbance, sufficient water must be applied to the area to be disturbed to prevent visible emissions from crossing the property line; (C)Areas to be graded or excavated must be kept adequately wetted to prevent visible emissions from crossing the property line; D Storage piles must be kept adequately wetted, ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Permit BS:Building Services The Village at Oakhaven SIP:Subdivision FD:Fire Department Improvement Plans PD:Police Department Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE:City Engineer TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary WW:Wastewater Occupancy CA:City Attorney FI:Final inspection AMWC:Water Comp. F0:Final Occupancy treated with a chemical dust suppressant, or covered when material is not being added to or removed from the pile; (E)Equipment must be washed down before moving from the property onto a paved public road; and (F)Visible track-out on the paved public road must be cleaned using wet sweeping or a HEPA filter equipped vacuum device within twenty-four(24) hours Mitigation Measure 3.b.1: Naturally Occurring Asbestos(NOA) BP PS 3.b.1 has been identified by the state Air Resources Board as a toxic air contaminant. Serpentine and ultramafic rocks are very common in the state and may contain naturally occurring asbestos. Under the State Air Resources Board Air Toxics Control Measure (ATCM)for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations, prior to any grading activities at the site,the project proponent shall ensure that a geologic evaluation is conducted to determine if naturally occurring asbestos is present within the area that will be disturbed. If naturally occurring asbestos is found at the site the applicant must comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM for Construction, Grading, Quarrying, and Surface Mining Operations. These requirements may include but are not limited to 1)an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan which must be approved by the District before construction begins, and 2)an Asbestos Health and Safety Program will also be required for some projects. Mitigation Measure 4.e.1: The Grading Plan shall identify tree BP PS 4.e.1 protection fencing around the dripline,or as recommended by the project arborist, of each existing on-site or off-site native tree. ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Permit BS:Building Services The Village at Oakhaven SIP:Subdivision FD:Fire Department Improvement Plans PD:Police Department Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE:City Engineer TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary WW:Wastewater Occupancy CA:City Attorney FI:Final inspection AMWC:Water Comp. F0:Final Occupancy Mitigation Measure 4.e.2: Grading and excavation and grading GP PS 4.e.2 work shall be consistent with the City of Atascadero Tree Ordinance. Special precautions when working around native trees include: 7. All existing trees outside of the limits of work shall remain. 8. Earthwork shall not exceed the limits of the project area. 9. Low branches in danger of being torn from trees shall be pruned prior to any heavy equipment work being done. 10. Vehicles and stockpiled material shall be stored outside the dripline of all trees. 11. All trees within the area of work shall be fenced for protection with 4-foot chain link, snow or safety fencing placed per the approved tree protection plan. Tree protection fencing shall be in place prior to any site excavation or grading. Fencing shall remain in place until completion of all construction activities. 12. Any roots that are encountered during excavation shall be clean cut by hand and sealed with an approved tree seal. ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Permit BS:Building Services The Village at Oakhaven SIP:Subdivision FD:Fire Department Improvement Plans PD:Police Department Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE:City Engineer TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary WW:Wastewater Occupancy CA:City Attorney FI:Final inspection AMWC:Water Comp. F0:Final Occupancy Mitigation Measure 4.e.3: The developer shall contract with a GP PS 4.e.3 certified arborist during all phases of project implementation. The certified arborists shall be responsible for monitoring the project during all phases of construction through project completion, as follows: (a) A written agreement between the arborist and the developer outlining a arborist monitoring schedule for each construction phase through final inspection shall be submitted to and approved by planning staff prior to the issuance of building/grading permits. (b) Arborist shall schedule a pre-construction meeting with engineering/planning staff, grading equipment operators, project superintendent to review the project conditions and requirements prior to any grubbing or earth work for any portion of the project site. All tree protection fencing and trunk protection shall be installed for inspection during the meeting. Tree protection fencing shall be installed at the line of encroachment into the tree's root zone area. (c) As specified by the arborist report and City staff: ■ Prune all trees in active development areas to be saved for structural strength and crown cleaning by a licensed and certified arborist; ■ Remove all debris and spoils from the lot cleaning and tree pruning. ■ In locations where paving is to occur within the tree canopy, grub only and do not grade nor compact. Install porous pavers over a three-inch bed of%inch granite covered with one-inch pea gravel for screeding. If curbs are required, use pegged curbs to secure the porous pavers. Pegged curbs are reinforced six to eight curbs poured at grade with a one-foot by one-foot pothole every four to six linear feet. ■ All trenching or grading within the protected root zone area, outside of the tree protection fence shall require hand trenching or preserve and protect roots that are larger than 2 inches in diameter. ■ No grading or trenching is allowed within the fenced protected area. ■ Any roots that are 4 inches in diameter or larger are not to be cut until inspected and approved by the on-site arborist. (d) Upon project completion and prior to final occupancy a final status report shall be prepared by the project arborist certifying that the tree protection plan was implemented, the trees designated for protection were protected during construction, and the construction-related tree protection measures are no longer required for tree protection. ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Permit BS:Building Services The Village at Oakhaven SIP:Subdivision FD:Fire Department Improvement Plans PD:Police Department Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE:City Engineer TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary WW:Wastewater Occupancy CA:City Attorney FI:Final inspection AMWC:Water Comp. F0:Final Occupancy Mitigation Measure 5.b.1: Should any cultural resources be GP,BP PS,BS unearthed during site development work,the provisions of CEQA -Section 15064.5,will be followed to reduce impacts to a non- significant level. Mitigation Measure 6.b: The grading permit application plans GP CE 6.b shall include erosion control measures to prevent soil, dirt, and debris from entering the storm drain system during and after construction. A separate plan shall be submitted for this purpose and shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer at the time of Building Permit application. (See section 8 of the is document). Mitigation Measure 6.c.d: A soils report shall be required to be GP BS 6.c.d submitted with a future building permit by the building department.The building plans will be required to follow the recommendations of the soils report to assure safety for residents and buildings. Mitigation Measure 8e.f.1: A Stormwater Pollution Prevention BP CE 8.e.f Plan (SWPPP)/Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the building permit. The plan shall include storm water measures for the operation and maintenance of the project for the review and approval of the City Engineer. The Building Permit application plans shall identify Best Management Practices (BMPs) appropriate to the uses conducted on site that effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants into storm water runoff. Mitigation Measure 8.e.f.2: The developer is responsible for BP BS,PS,CE 8.ef.2 ensuring that all contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such measures are implemented. Failure to comply with the approved construction Best Management Practices will result in the issuance of correction notices, citations, or stop work orders. Mitigation Measure 11.d: All construction activities shall comply Ongoing BVIRS 11.d with the City of Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours of operation. Mitigation Measure 15.a.b.1: Full frontage improvements shall be BP BS,PS 15.a.b.1 required along EI Camino Real. Internal project circulation shall be designed to enhance flow and minimize traffic conflicts by implementing traffic calming measures and utilizing one-way streets as appropriate and as approved by the Community Development Director. ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Conditions of Approval/ Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program /Monitoring Measure GP:Grading Permit PS:Planning Services BP:Building Permit BS:Building Services The Village at Oakhaven SIP:Subdivision FD:Fire Department Improvement Plans PD:Police Department Vesting Tentative Tract Map FM:Final Map CE:City Engineer TTM 2005-0067 TO:Temporary WW:Wastewater Occupancy CA:City Attorney FI:Final inspection AMWC:Water Comp. F0:Final Occupancy Mitigation Measure 15.c.1: The Contractor shall maintain one Ongoing BS,PS 15.c.1 lane for traffic at all times. Traffic control shall be in accordance with the current Caltrans manual for traffic control and work area traffic control handbook. No street or lane closures shall be permitted unless previously arranged for and granted by the City Engineering Department. ITEM NUMBER: C - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 7679 . lrr r 1975 Atascadero City Council Staff Report — City Clerk Planning Commission Appointments RECOMMENDATIONS: Council: 1. In accordance with Ordinance No. 565, adopted on February 26, 2013, select new members to fill the directly appointed Planning Commission positions whose terms will commence March 29, 2013 and continue through December 31, 2014; and, 2. Review the six applications supplied by interested citizens and select two for the at-large positions on the Planning Commission. DISCUSSION: Directly Appointed Planning Commissioners: The City Council discussed the Planning Commission during their Strategic Planning Workshop in January. The Council directed staff to bring forward an Ordinance that would amend the Municipal Code concerning the terms for Planning Commissioners. At that time the Municipal Code listed that directly appointed Planning Commissioners shall have a term of four years, and at-large Planning Commissioners shall have a term of two years. The City Council decided to adopt an Ordinance that would amend this language to state that all Planning Commissioners shall have two-year terms, and shall be appointed in the December following a General Municipal election. That Ordinance was adopted on February 26, 2013 and goes into effect March 28th. The Ordinance states: SECTION 2. The terms of appointment for the directly appointed members of the Planning Commission for the term of 2013-2014 shall commence on March 29, 2013 and shall continue through December 31, 2014. To effectuate the appointment of new directly appointed members of the Planning Commission for terms commencing on March 29, 2013, all persons holding appointed office as directly appointed members of the Planning Commission on March 28, 2013 shall have their term of appointment terminated on that day. At the meeting of the City Council on March 26, 2013, or thereafter, the City Council shall select new members to fill the directly appointed Planning Commission positions as set forth in Section 1 of this ordinance. ITEM NUMBER: C - 1 DATE: 03/26/13 Therefore, the current directly appointed Planning Commissioners' terms will be terminated on March 28, 2013. The Ordinance directs that at the Council meeting of March 26th or thereafter, the City Council shall select new members to fill the directly appointed Planning Commission positions. Staff is recommending that the City Council appoint their directly appointed Commissioners at their March 26, 2013 meeting. These Commissioners terms will begin March 29th and continue through to December 31, 2014. At-Large Planning Commissioners: The Atascadero Municipal Code states that the two at-large positions on the Planning Commission shall be appointed by a majority of the entire Council. The terms for these positions are two years, expiring on December 31 of each even-numbered year. The City Clerk solicited applications for the two Planning Commission at-large positions from the members of the public pursuant to State Law. Six applications for the Planning Commission were received (see Attachment 2), and the City Council interviewed the candidates on February 19, 2013. The City Council decided at that time to postpone their vote for the at-large candidates until after the Council appointed their new two-year term directly-appointed Planning Commissioners. This decision was made to ensure that if any of the existing directly appointed Planning Commissioners were not re- appointed, they would be given an opportunity to express an interest in being considered for one of the two at-large positions. The City Council Members, at their March 12, 2013 meeting, announced that they would all be reappointing their existing directly-appointed Planning Commissioners; therefore, staff is recommending the City Council select two citizens from the six candidates they interviewed on February 19, 2013 for the at-large Planning Commission positions. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Municipal Code regarding Commissions 2. Applications Chapter 9 PLANNING COMMISSION Attachment 1 Atascadero Municipal Code Up Previous Next Maln Collapse Search Print No Frames Title 2 ADMINISTRATION Chapter 9 PLANNING COMMISSION 2-9.01 creation:Composition. There is created a Planning Commission for the City which shall consist of seven(7)members who shall not be officials or employees of the City,but who shall be residents of the City.(Ord. 101 §2(part), 1985) 2-9.02 Members: Appointment: Terms of office. The City Council shall appoint members of the Planning Commission as follows:two(2)members shall be appointed by a majority vote of the entire Council.Those two(2)positions shall be appointed for terms of two (2)years commencing January 1,2005 and expiring December 31,2006.Except as modified below,the remaining five(5)members shall be directly appointed by each individual City Council Member in the December following the election at which the City Council member is elected.The terms of appointment for the directly appointed members of the Planning Commission shall be four(4)years and expire on December 31,or until the appointing Council Member vacates office.Appointments may be made after the commencement of a term to fill a vacancy or removal,in which case the term of office shall be for the balance of the unexpired term. In the event that a member at large(appointed by a majority vote of the entire Council)resigns or is removed,the vacancy shall be filled by a majority vote of the entire City Council.In the event that a member directly appointed by a City Council Member resigns or is removed,the vacancy shall be filled by the individual City Council Member that made the appointment of the resigning or removed Planning Commission Member.All members shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council and may continue to serve after expiration of the stated term,with the approval of the City Council,until such time as a successor is selected according to the procedures set for the above.(Ord.411 § 1,2003:Ord,327§2,1997;Ord.291 § 1,1995:Ord.200§ 1, 1990:Ord. 101 §2 (part),1985) 2-9.03 Absence from meetings._. Absence of a member of the Planning Commission from three(3)consecutive meetings,or fiorn four(4) meetings during a calendar year,without formal consent of the Planning Commission noted in its official minutes,shall be reported by the.Planning Director to the City Council for consideration of removal from office. (Ord.200§2, 1990:Ord. 101 §2(part), 198 5) 2-9.04 Members:Removal from office. A member of the Planning Commission serves at the pleasure of the City Council and may be removed from office,with or without cause,by a majority vote of all the members of the City Council.(Ord.200§3, 1990:Ord. 101 §2(part), 1985) 2-9.05 Vacancies. A vacancy on the Planning Commission occurring by death,resignation,removal,or any other cause before the expiration of the term of the member shall be filled by appointment for the unexpired term by the Council. (Ord. 101 §2(part),1985) 2-9.06 Planning Commission members shall be entitled to remuneration for expenses in accordance with the procedure approved by resolution of the Council.(Ord, 101 §2(part), 1985) 2-9.07 Powers,duties,and functions. The powers,duties,and functions of the Planning Commission shall be all those powers,duties,and functions of a Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Adjustment as provided in Chapters 3 and 4 of Title 7, commencing with Section 65 100 of the Government Code of the State(the Planning and Zoning Law),as the same may be hereafter amended.The Planning Commission shall perform such other duties and functions as may be directed or designated by the Council not inconsistent with State law.(Ord. 101 §2(part), 1995) 2-9.08 Organization. -------- As of February I st annually,or as soon thereafter as is feasible,the Planning Commission shall elect a chairman and a vice-chairman from among its members.The chairman shall preside over meetings,appoint appropriate committees,sign resolutions and direct the affairs of the Commission.In the absence of the chairman,the duties of this office shall be performed by the vice-chairman.The Commission shall conduct meetings pursuant to adopted rules for the transaction of business,shall keep a public record of its resolutions, transactions,findings,and determinations and shall hold regularly scheduled meetings in the Rotunda Room, fourth floor,Administration Building,6500 Palma Avenue,Atascadero,every first and third Tuesday evening at seven p.m.,and on such other days,at such other times,as may be designated in order for a special meeting. When the day for any regular meeting of the Planning Commission falls on a legal holiday,the meeting shall not be held on such holiday but should be held at the same hour on the next succeeding day there-after which is not a holiday,or at such other time as shall be determined and noticed by the Planning Commission.(Ord.291 §2, 1995:Ord. 142§2,1986:Ord. 101 §2(part), 1985) 2-9.09 P!qRqi!lg mission;Relations to Council and staff. (a) The City Council establishes policies citywide and specifically as they relate to the duties of the Planning Commission.The Planning Commission is advisor to the Council except where the Council has delegated specific authority to the Commission.City staff administers the policies of the Council,forwards recommendations of the Commission to the Council and administers Planning Commission actions on issues delegated to the Commission by the Council.The Planning Commission may recommend to the Council topics to be included in the City's work program. (b) The Commission and its members shall work through the Community Development Director,except for the purpose of inquiry,in carrying out the Commission's responsibilities. (c) Commissioners shall not attempt to coerce or influence staff in the making of appointments,the awarding of contracts,the selection of consultants,the processing of development applications,or the granting of City licenses or permits.Commissioners shall not attempt to change or interfere with the operating policies and practices of any City department. (d) Commissioners shall not attend internal staff meetings or meetings between City staff and third persons unless invited by City staff or directed by Council to do so.Commissioners may attend meetings of private organizations that staff may attend.Commissioners may attend any public meeting of the City or any public agency.(Ord.504§3,2007) Attachment 2 - - -.-.._.......__. ill Please return to: <TrV CLERK I t o r a 6907 EI Camino Real Atnscadern,CA 93422 , CAI) l;' CITY OF ATASCADERO PI,ANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION Please Note: You must rneet the miuhnum qualifications of being a registered voter and resident.of the City. Minimum qualifications are subject to verification. Please complete the Supplernental Questionnaire,which avi-Tinpanies this application. APPLICATION FOR: PLANNING COMMISSION NAME: _l �q t_'IFF Email Address: ADDRESS: Flume Phone: TC s`£`G! C/e,/I Ct 44rrk Phone: _ IYLAILING ADDRESS(if different): Are you a resident of the City of Alascadero? Flow Long? J"i) C e Are you a registered voter? Yes No OCCUPATION: ZZ EMPLOYMENT- Present or last employer's name,address and phone number; ,3�� LV �tr� �G;�hg J-40 Position held and length of employment: /o, c./.7,,,. 0 1 E:DUCA'TION: t"%€3 city of Atascadero. Planning Commission Application Paget �fF� Applicant's Name RELEVANT TRAINING, EXPERIENCE, CERTIFICA'T'ES OF 'DRAINING. LICENSES OR PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: G /61r���C�,p�( Y.cr:CA .fc.?car t�anr Pi�r./r:S / Vr,'r% rtiC � hazer 'r' 094.f l,jort�ent 1/�� -__ _ Ae �Er r.rTnzC,!-r Cc:�<� //ieetyo,- ail cs vcr � J .J.�G f r^sac/ C r✓c;n Pr E:-,�.! ��?t��� .'�r ref k't f Gtr;�'J r;nTJ' t,,vrt✓ Y•!.,f ;'�•-,Cdr!C��:.I ,�n�r�cf t"'T u^`;f•'G'�Lr irti°�O,yfr7n «7` ��'��,5t.......,�.. /9 e? `IFI , d ,-, l /�/-- r-� —�`qe> ---=�-----�'Fe �' c 1` / fir:dW•h ec•E/O.QI, zTd VF 'v I r�Rn �fagQ:"G(�ylCfpp7/ all el7JhP LNVOLVE NT IN COMMUNITY,VOLUNTEER,PROFESSIONAL AND/OR ACADi IYCC ORGANIZATIONS: Ln/IL..ed i✓7 a Ge 7,10 �°�cft /� f s' a7f'L-/ f� � t.G�,-�. �'� �1 Can, cn.�. •a i',`j' � ''d a,,2 s" _._. ._ OTHER CITY COMMISSIONS,COMMITTEES OR BOARDS PREVIOUSLY OR CURRENTLY SERVING ON: C Y(Il C-7 Il_ /r dlu i'('�> �`� � -7 Haw did you learn about this vacancy? Newspaper Article_ t/ Newspaper Ad Community Group Word of Mouth__— LibraryCity Balt Place of Employment Other(specify): Please complete the following supplemental greestionnaire. reel free to atlacit a resume or other irtforrnatiorr about yourself: I hereby certify,under penalty of perjury,drat the information on this application and attached supplement are true and COITeC t. Signature: �_. `_< Date: _ �/�r�Y/ 2i-) This application and supplement are"public documents"and are as,ailabie for review upon request. Applicants are advised they may be requested to fide a Statement of Econonvc Interest, pursuant to the Fair Political Practices regulations. Information will be provided by the City Clerk. City of Atascadero Plamning Commission Application Page 3 Charles Sourbeau Applicant's Name CITY OF ATA5CADERO SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE PLANNING COMPAISSION i. Please explain why you would like to serve on the Planning Commission, I have always had an interest in and stayed abreast of planning and development issues in Atascadero. I now have the time to be more actively involved. 2. Have you ever attended a meeting of the Planning Commission? —X—Yes —No 3. What is it about the Planning Commission that interests you? What qualities, experience,and expertise would you bring to the Planning Commission? I am interested in the future of Atascadero and the Planning Commission plays an important role in that regard. I am a longtime resident of our City and am familiar with our local government and the issues facing our community, I read or ask for as much information as possible about an issue before forming a strong opinion or making a decision. I am genuinely interested in the input of others. I feel these qualities makes me a responsible and fair decision maker. 4. In your view,what is the function of the Planning Commission? To provide recommendations to the City Council regarding planning and development activities in the City. To make decisions on projects that do not require City Council review but cannot be decided at the staff level. S. How would you see your role as a member of the Planning Commission? I see myself as being thorough in reviewing Staff provided materials,visiting all project sites,and listening to public input,so that I may ask thoughtful questions,make informed decisions, and contribute to a Planning Commission that best serves the community, City of Atascadero Planning Commission Application Page Charles Bourbeau Applicant's Name 6. What are the current issues facing the Planning Commission? I believe the biggest issues facing the Planning Commission in the next two years will be the Eagle Ranch project, dealing with the Climate Action Plan mandated by AB32, and the ongoing issue of promoting successful economic development in the City. 7. Are you familiar with the City's General Plan,and if so, describe briefly your views about the document? I am familiar with the structure of the General Plan and the nature of the required elements. I believe the General Plan should serve as the primary guide to managing the development of the City but that it should be changed when necessary to reflect changing circumstances or to take advantage of critical opportunities. 8. If appointed,what specific goals would you like to see the Planning Commission achieve? Where possible,I would like to see the Planning Commission facilitate an environment that encourages economic development, particularly that which would provide local jobs and improve sales tax and transient occupancy tax revenue. 9. If there is additional information you would like to share about yourself, please use the following space provided(optional). I have the time,the knowledge, and the interest to be an effective Planning Commissioner. I certify that the foregoing information is true and correct. Signature; -� Z Qate: C# / J� {} _.. , G7 J � /i J I t Ptmw return to: '� `_ k�•� 69117 E!C:tnuao Real t les"� 1979 Atuscodero.CA 9U22 -- �r CITY OF ATASCADERO PIS NI KING CO:dIIo-•[TSSION A.PPI,ICATION Please Noie: You lrnrst meet the minimum qualifications of being a registered Yoter and rtsident of the City. Minimum qualifications are subject to verification. Please complete the Supplemental Questionnaire,whit;h accompanies this application. >?P>.lCArION OR: PLA, NI IG COMMISSION fNAME.�l : ' V _._..__.... _.......__ .,_...._.. i✓rrtail Address: - R1 SIDCNTI. MONr ADDRESS: __ Herne Phone: .. Work Phone: - -- MAH-ING ADDRESS of differow: Are you a resident of the City of Atascadern? 7 cz- ..._.__ How Uine? Are you a registered voter? Yes... No pccvPnxtoN: EMPLOYMENT-Present or last employers name,address and phone number: P (AW- 4��gl,C�C r-74-,!�ALIO rl,;RY6-- 1 0 &it/ lOA/// _ _ - Position held and length of ployment: _azW_ - >DUCKrION: � �0/ -7 - __ _ ---- ��7'%�'� .-�� �/������R�.SYS_-�_._.✓-���� �/`��..� _.... . .--- . City of Atascadero Planning Commission Application Page 2 /i✓' Applicant's Name RELEVANT TRAINING, EXPERIENCE. CERTIFICKIMS OF TRAINING. LICENSES OR PROFESSIONAL REG191'RATION: ZP7 1IvVOI..VI=MPIr"I'IN COMMUNITY,VQi.LT1'sER.PROF1?SSIQN AND/ORA DI.MIC ORGANIZATIONS: 10 OTHER CITY Col�vJMISSIONS,C.OM1\41`1-1-EES OR BOARDS PIT-MOUSLY OR CURRENTLY SFRV ING ON: Iiow did you learn about this vacancy? Newspaper Article Newspaper Ad Community Group—,_ Ward of Mouth Library City Nall Place of Employment Other(specify): Please complete the following supplemental questionnaire. Feel free to attach a re.suine or other information about yourself. I hereby certify.under Penalty of perjury,that the information on this application and attached supplement are true and correct. } Signatu Date: ._._.._.__._..-- "Phis application and supplement are"public doctsnettts"And are available for review upon request. Applicants are advised they may be requested to file a Statement of Economic interest, pursuant to the Fair Political Practices regulations. Infornw;ion-will be pro-doed by the City Clcrk. by of Atascadero Planning Commission Application Page 3 Applicant's Mame CITY OF ATASCA®ER4 SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE PLANNING COMMISSION 1. Please explain why you would like to serve on the Planning Commission. eS S"4- ii, 4Ye�Uel 66 OA 771, C !� 2. Have you ever attended a meeting of the Planning commission? XYs _No 1 What is it about the Planning Commission that interests you? What qualities, experienceand expertise would you bring to the Planning Commission? /4vo 'S�� � - 51 4. to your view,what is the function of the Planning Conn ' sion? KI 1z / ple- /// 5. How would you see your role as a member of the Planning Commission? ?elml 3o yp7z'- -29 City of Atascadero Planning Commission Application J 111A. / I) Page 4 zj� Applicant's Name 6. What are the current issues facing the Planning Co mission? 14Z k nlwl Vx C7 - 1V, 7. Are you familiar with the City's General Plan,and if so, describe briefly your views about the document. dA-1 VA 7Z 8. If appointed,what specific goals would you like to see the Planning Commission achieve? a)4;ell 17X- -& 9. If there is additional information you would like to share about yourself, please use the following space provided (optional). —7"- C 124 5/- V a 2-1 A��' '/ 64 4;& - ' —� 41 ZZ 01 A here cern� that t foregoing information is r e andrre cc ct. Signal"e; Date: ell—-3 Y. t'tease reivrn tu: CITY CLFRKr r K \lVJy 6907 El Camino Real rer�l Aiascadero,CA 93422 C! CITY OF ATASCADlEIiO PLANNING CONMISSION APPLICATION Please Note: You must meet the minimum qualifications of twing a registered voter and resident of the City. Mininitun qualifications are subject to verification. Please complete the Supplenrerttal Questionnaire,which accompanies this application. APPLICAUON POR: PLANNING CONMUSSION NAME: (� N`l�� tJ� AA I._Q__1 Email Address: - RESIDEMIAL ~ ADDRESS: __.. _.. Home Phone: _ A26CA 0et� Ck��1L4 Work Phone: MAILING ADDRESS(if diffcreitt): Are you a resident of the City of Atascadero? �C� How Long? � Are you a registered voter? Yes 1V No OCCUPATION: W 4 0yV P-V v 0 P- EMPLOYMENT-Present or last employer's name,address and phone number: Von f�'Q������k� Position held and length of employment: EDUCATION: I City of Atascadero Planning Commission Applicationy', / Page 2 � it b Appl'icant's Name RELEVANT TRAINING, EXPERIENCE, CERTIFICATES OF TRAINING, LICENSES OR PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: INVOLVEMENT IN COMMUNITY,VOLUNT .R,PROFESSIONAL AND/OR ACADEMIC ORGANIZATIONS: air Pie 10 MIF x OTHER CITY COMMISSIONS,COMMITTEES OR BOARDS PREVIOUSLY OR CURRENTLY SERVING ON: Mow did you learn about this vacancy? �� Newspaper Article � Newspaper Ad--X Cornmuniiy Group Ward of Mouth >� Library City Hall Y1'-- Place of Employment Other(specify):,_ -6 _ ,Please complete the following supplemental questionnaire. Feel free to attach a resume or other information about yourself. I hereby certify,under penalty of perjury,that the information on this application and attached supplement are true and Correct. } n Signature: _ Bate: This application and supplement are"public documents"and are available for review upon request. Applicants are advised they may be requested to rile a Statement of Economic Interest, pursuant to the Fair Political Practices regulations. Information will be provided by the City Clerk. City of Atascadero Planning Commission Application ;r �^ f Page 3 L Applicant's Name CITY OF ATASCADERO SUPPLEMENTAL. QUESTIONNAIRE PLANNING COMMISSION 1. Please explain why you would like to serve on the Planning Commission. 0,0 HIT �>F, (2,-Ur 0"C -TO `rkj� C"rj,� L) M l� .02 2. Have you ever attended a meeting of the Planning Commission? kes —No 3. What is it about the Planning Commission that interests you? What qualities, experience and expertise would you bring to the Planning Commission? �1 1(2 4, In your view,what is the function of the Planning Commission? r�iellt rmjecr/� I ro Amir Mr-t-,—n. � TO �1�'r O��G c� �ytt2r�-�t�-. � 5. How would you see your role as a member of the Planning Commission? t City of Atascadero {t t Planning Commission Application (( �� Cv� f J 1 Page 4 �{1`-[ _ r i t Applicant's Name 6. What are the current issues facing the Planning Commission? A(-V ate FLAri t 7. Are you familiar with the City's General Plan,and if so,describe briefly your views about the document. 1�U r�-f f CSD vett`� 1-MC 16 8. if appointed,what specific goals would you like to see the Planning Commission achieve? 9• if there is additional information you would like to share about yourself, please use the following space provided (optional). I hereby certify that the foregoing information is true and correct. Baf " Signature: '`' "✓ (�f'`1�`�( 4' Date, 1�(O `�r G'2� f✓, Please return to: J CITY Ctl?1tK a YI 6907 F1 Camino heal 101 Atascadero,CA 93422 CITY OF ATASCADERO PLANNING COVIMSSION APPLICATION Please Note: 'You most meet the minitvu,u gratifications of being a registered voter and resident of the City. Mininimn qualifications are subject to verification. Please complete the Supplemental Questionnaire,which accompanies this application. APPLICAY[ON FOR: (PLANNING C011M SSION NAME; ,yt..__�jot t'� _ q�� e _ Email Address: RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS: Home Phone: tea! -s�=�°� W4dc Phone: MAILING ADDRESS(f different): Are you a resident of the City of Atasoadero? . _ How Long? Are you a registered voter? .Yes No OCCUPATION,. EMPLOYMENT-Present or last employer's name,address and phone number: Position held and length of employment: EDUCATION: cave IA-1 '-rh !t'✓ nl�it. aum� j�u-� 017 s�s ®ate, a,.� �a,,",r �, City of Atascadero Planning Commission Application Page 2 Chu k c! Applicant's Name RELEVANT TRAINING, EXPERIENCE, CERT'IFICAT'ES OF TRAINING, LICENSES OR PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: i 1 5 4,+'/h!� .®e+° f a c c a �, C_._ +ro c r 1 is Cell-s re9c�r�_> - ��' d�P a`-k4�t �3. 5�. d'oer���$�>raS�� r 8r+aen•t •�, d�o++�+C.Ss C��•,S�il� l�q�:,,�txtar��r�� ,� �'rv7`�8���``�� 114 INVOLVEivIF:NT IN CoMmUMTY,VOLUNTEER,PROFESSIONAL.AND/OR ACADEMIC ORGANI7ATIONS: A(� wQ4s, V - -x��Tu!9 0Srdnt �(,�¢��ecac• Fn �z,� �G►��.h�._�►_.�2_�... ' �r+r�Eia��..C �1P�'1Z3�mss} OTHER CITY COMMISSIONS,COMIvIMEES OR BOARDS PREVIOUSLY OR CURRENTLY SERVING ON: y ~� p. I VYt Stec t>sws e/9jA{9" Oatl,444 �7'(T .G I lYl�1! ryC�l�F�� �v°s ���c.i�•Tr� � �}rrieiarc�,('h�e�r3�j' �c�C.e�+tiat�.�q'� �t;�:l`+�ry Gfp►�sowro• .-aGD�vC.� _ <C+hY'YV17Vk1"/--C G:h(ki�°�''+`b°�, (�l�a�»ti��+Cn�,ar>ao;s tc r• �s��' 'clow did you learn about this vacancy? Newspaper Article Newspaper Ad Community Group Word of Mouth Library- City Hall ZPlace of Employment'_ Other(specify):_. Please complete the following supplemental questionnaire. Feel free to attach a resume or other information about yourself, I hereby certify,under penalty of perjury,that the information on this application and attached supplement are true and correct. Signature: _ 2 ' Date: _ This application and supplement are"publit documents"and are available for review upon request. Applicants are advised they may be requested to file a Statement of Economic Interest, pursuant to the Fair 'Political Practices regulations. Information will be provided by the City Clerk J Cr Y OF ATASCADERO SUPPLEMENTAL.E,UES-nONNAJRE 1 please explain why you would 1€Ice to serve or+the Planning Commission. to d JG g . -• 'd 1 ®6 e t^� t�CL e,ir9 ' to`i °i}'�4 Y��.,�1 C� I 2_ Have you ever attended a meeting of the Planning Commission? Vves _ No 3. What is ft about the Planning Commission that interests you? What qualftles, experience and expertise would you bring to the Planning Commission? Z' 6 0 a^-N 1 V-& B m 0y�ar,�l ,� c e, 1.1 rn 4, In your view,what is the junction of ti'ie planning Commission? �r a y � U 'Y C ' a r v ���.�� l�Yf� .E�� �z�/���e' °�� �'&�►ra Fr a+�f.�e `�„�� �1tl E��,I�� 5. How would you see your role as a member-of the Planninq Commission? All t 1'p r � " Leo af'fa f Citi+of Atascadero Planning Con-)rnission Supplernental Questionnaire Page. 6. What are the current issues.facing the Planning Commission? 4-1 R.141prl 7. Are you familiar with the City's general Plan,and if so,describe briefly your v iews about the document T"_ o rtn. t A) 8. If appointed,what specific goals would you like to seethe Planning Cammission achieve? r � ,N. r P-j a 10 e- a. Y /SSS j, jzjQ W*tsh' '' 11i d P-, 7` t , Tht eil y g. if there"is addittional information you would Ike to share about yourself, please use the fallowing space provided(optional). fu t4 o e,/AiLo FS e,.c�xlaely op, r t> � d d 4 r rte+ Vfr . /}ca�«aS Agri`' t�""aattPIP � .,� hQ Vr +�5}� Gt 4 C( a-A e— r of C.( had I hereby certifyat the forego iia iormaAun is true and corre(;C ` Signature: bate: ',j », � ` ?f Muse rettlr7l to, J My CLERK IV tf 6907 91 Cimino Rtalwo J A 1'� 2 Atascadero,CA 9M22 'J Ci 1'y 01r:A-r'A.:,'-AiA DERO � CITY OF ATASCADIER0 CITY CLEIRK's OFFIC C- PLANNING COM MSSION APPLICATION Fjc&Note, Vou nnxst meet the adWrman qualificabom of being a registered voter and t-esident of the City. Milumunt qualir)ci'dws are subject to werinotiom Please complete the Supplemental Quesdonnaire,Whid,accompanks this application: APPLICATION FOR- PLANNING COMMISSION A NAW Email Address: RF-SMEN1 ADDRESS. Rome Phone-, Work Phone: MAILING ADDRESS firdiffermt): Are you a resident of the City of Atascadero?_Y_41'A__ 14owlong? Are you a registered voter? Yes No OCCUPATION- Hlq� Ych o 6 L 'c(I ENWLOYW-NT-Present or last employer's name,address and phone number: e-' 4 ocl Position held and length of employment: EDUCATION: r City of Atascadero Planning Commissi n.Application Page 2 Applicant's Name ILEI LVANI' 'TRAINING, FXPER7ENCE, CERTIFICATES OF TRAINING, LI:CEA;SFS OR PRGF'I✓SSIONAL REGISTRATION. ----.. Ncl n e7/n-1 Ot urn rer I s t.V,n _-- INIV OLVENtEN'IAN CONIMUNIT'Y,VOLUNTEER,PROFESSIONAL A.NDIOR ACADEMIC ORGANIZATIONS: wvtS-S 4(-0.n0�0 y n ) nig t��Y1�Y".t dtZLl,,'t r: J OTIiF ITY COMMISSIONS,COMMITTEES OR BOARDS PREVIOUSLY OR CURR'FN'I°L:Y SERVING ON: �.i..t t'"--�=v"'tlL-.fc✓ '►�"� v't't-s�'JJ _�i ��'!,�[ (,�d l'Y!v�� 5.Sr :-vf How did you learnt about this vacancy? Newspaper Article— Newspaper Ad Community Groin Word of Mout], Library— City Ball 21CPlace of Employment„_„_,_., Other(specify): Please complete Ifte following Supplemental questionnaire, Feel free to attach a resume or rather Information about-yoursetr I hereby certify,under penalty of perjury,that the information on this application and attached supplement are true and correCl- Signature: _— bate: 'I'ltis application and supplement are"pultl3c documeuW'and are available for review upon request. Applicants are athised they mar be requested to Me a Statetuent of Feonomnie Interest, pursuant to the Fair Political Practices regulations. Inforatation will be provider)by the City Clerk. City of Atascadero Planning Commission Application Page 3 Applicahs i4a'r-nl–e CITY OF ATASCADERO SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE PLANNING COMMISSION 1, Please explain why you would like to serve on the Planning Commission. cerin V%"" S7 2, J-18ve you ever attended a meeting of the Planning Commission? Xyes —No 3. What is it about the Planning Commission that interests you? What qualifies,experience and expertise would you bring to the Planning Commission? C6 V-1 C k C, S I V" e. 4. In your view,what is the function of the Planning Com MA-\A oci VrV 5. How would you see your role as a member of the Planning Commission? JE 4-c> cz---6 vi0 Jv— \'n U o tvsJ C '3' City of Atascadero Planning Commission Application y � L . Page 4 Y App cant's Name 6. What are the curreentyiss�reess facing the Planning Commission? y kh-VI 4k� , ," ~ I, 16 Ce p CAI Q'L 7. Are you familiar with the City's General Plan,and if so, describe briefly your views about the document. Ar+L I�'i Fn nes 0 \,/ 3. If appointed,wh t specific goals would you l see the Planning omrrrls achle owe -Flywc/ \4 4-Cyvt-��2,�„ � �-�cs� <�;q� 9. If there is additional information you would like to share about yourself, please use the following space provided (optional). I hereby certify that the foregoing Information is true and correct. Signature: Date: Please reiuni to: s �� CITY CURK 'its r a 6947 El Camsno Real Atascadero,CA 93422 C14D�n�, l CITY OF AT ASCADERO PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION Please Note: You must meet kite minimum qualifications of being a registexed voter and resident of the City. Minimum qualifications are subject to verificatiom Please complete the Supptementai Questionnaire,which accompanies flus application. APPLICATION FOR: PLANNING CONBUSSION NAME: Saaft U Email Address: RESIDENT ADDRESS:1wwwN*wftwK--- Home Phone: C � I CA Work Plione: MAILING ADDRESS(if different):_ Are you a resident of the City of Atascadero? .S How Dong? --J-- y►'1 o ni�s _ Are you a registered voter? Yes__-X—_ No OCCIIPATTON: —gf L.' EMPLOYMENI'-Present or last employer's name,address and phone number: O rem"\ � Position held and length of employment: EDUCATION: Maskr - City of Atascadero Planning Commission Application Page 2 5 n A fit'55 Applicant' Name RELEVANT TRAINING, EXPERIENCE, CERTIFICATES OF TRAINING, LICENSES OR PROFESSIONAL, REGISTRATION: ,, fo s _�,�� Let �dS4t3 tv� tt �1C �[nn�rtiSl�ok�iQyl� cill�vsc�ar�(>ti�h�af . J�_�C*?tm � - re Ga'S GZ. CA a 1 A&42r, ki t)'e- z t*5 asetY►1c2N �f" a� (A(-44iu'� 00 P2 'v�S.�C ��EEokric a5 L; cokvtzr Mn n/'dam ba1r yw < �i 0� 1&1,sjZ cr INVOLVEMENT'IN COMMUNITY',V j- DEER,PROFESS] AL AND/OR ACADEMIC ORGAN -KNONS: r;acs �� zvt E�. Cr 13 r tiG �,- nc�_$ (�j► r?at cr�c, -S om-Kbyx .5 r ga-11 veli Ry b C jTV OTHER CITY'COMMISSIONS,COMMITTEES OR BOARDS PREVIOUSLY OR CURRENTLY SERVING ON: �- zt Sr a c�_� o•.. D�'��e r C't _.:__.__._ � �__ i�r�a..�1 res 41"s- - How did you learn about this vacancy? Newspaper Article )( Newspaper Ad Community Group.- Word of Mouth Library City Hall Place of Employment Other(specify): please complete the following supplemental questionnaire. Feel free to attach a resume or other information about yourself. I hereby certify,under penalty of perjury,that the information on this application and attached supplement are true and correct. Signatur Date: "' 2-9 —2p 13 _ This application and supplement are"public documents" and are available for review upon request. Applicants are advised they may be requested to file a Statement of Economic interest, pursuant to the Fair Political Practices regulations. Information will be provided by the City Clerk. City of Atascadero Planning Commission Application Page 3 Applicant's Naoie CITY OF ATASCA®ER0 SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE PLANNING COMMISSION 1, Please explain why you would like to serve on the Planning Commission, h f� 5e-e- cil�e�c �5fv"-r-es 2. Have you everattended a meeting of the Planning Commission? Yes No 3. What is it about the Planning Commission that interests you? What qualities, experience and expertise would you bring to the Planning Commission? e— 4. in your view,vhat is the function of the Planning Commission? 5. How would you see your role as a member of the Planning Commission? City of Atascadero Planning Commission Application Page 4 Applicant's Namd 6. What are the current issues facing the Planning Commission? Se, , 7. Are you familiar with the City's General Plan,and if so, describe briefly your views about the document. 8. if appointed,what specific goals would you like to see the Planning Commission achieve? e;e 9. if there is additional information you would like to share about yourself, please use the following space provided(optional). 5e e Ga C � (LSI rn 2 I hereby certify that the foregoing information is true and correct. Signature: Date: - 2�l- City of Atascadero Supplemental Questionnaire Planning Commission Responses of Scott Burgess 1.Why on PC-Atascadero is now my home,and 1 want to contribute positively to its future while recognizing its past. 1 am interesting in making Atascadero an even better community,and I believe I have a lot to offer in terms of professional planning credentials and local government experience. 1 have the time and the motivation to give back to this community. I have no ulterior motives other than improving Atascadero as a representative citizen. 3.What interests you -I have academic and professional training and experience in planning. Without a vision,a plan,and implementing ordinances,a city does not know and cannot achieve what its citizens want. Planning and land use actions will have the most influence on the livability,character,design,vitality and sustainability of a community. I have served as staff to and trained planning commissions,and I have reviewed their actions as a city councilor. 4.Functions of PC-The Planning Commission is made up of citizens appointed by the City Council to provide both a legislative(long range planning and ordinance development) and quasi-judicial(land use and development review) functions. Its actions are both final and advisory. Planning Commissioners are made up of and listen to citizens,but by their appointment and service,they provide more knowledgeable,ongoing,and representative citizen input to staff and the City Council. The Commission must act within federal,state,and local laws and ordinances in balancing the needs and wants of the citizens,protecting the environment,honoring private property rights,and providing for a vibrant economy. 5.Role as a PC-I would study the plans and ordinances of the City of Atascadero and read the applications and staff reports provided. I would listen to the staff, citizens,applicants and fellow commissioners. I would continue to learn about my community. Finally, I would use this information together with my experience and knowledge to make recommendations and take actions that I believe are in the best interests of the community,today and in the future. 6.Current issues- • Del Rio Rod Commercial Area Specific Plan--Wal-Mart Supercenter • Eagle Ranch • South Fl Camino Real Visioning Project • Air Pollution Control District Climate Action Plan • Colony Square Page I of 2 City of Atascadero Supplemental Questionnaire Planning Commission Responses of Scott Burgess • Increased activity as the economy improves While some of these issues have been before the Planning Commission,l believe the subsequent actions and outcomes will have significant impacts on the community and will require additional legislative or quasi-judicial actions by the Planning Commission. 7.General Plan,familiarity and views-The current General Plan was adopted in 2002 and updated in 2004,with some land use updates more recently. Even the 2002 plan was an"update"of the comprehensive planning done in 1980 following incorporation. Even so,the Plan is comprehensive in its coverage of issues affecting the community and specificallythe adopted Framework Principles dealing with the natural environment,community appearance and character,secure revenue base and welt-planned neighborhoods. In most cases,the language of a General Plan is only as good as its implementing ordinances in response to growth pressures, unplanned circumstances,and available funds. One personal observation is whether statements as to a vibrant downtown (e.g.Goal LOC 4,Policy 4.1,3.) are strong enough,especially in their implementation. It seems that Atascadero has many attributes-history,size,zoo,gateway to the beach,etc_-to attract businesses and have a stronger downtown that is less auto-dependent. For example,the commercial land uses around the Sunken Garden seem to favor professional offices, which more logically could be focused.on Morro Road. The zoning should allow and encourage dining,galleries and other mixed uses that attract day and evening pedestrian activities. 8.Goals like to see PC achieve- Encourage policies and actions that build a sense of place and pride in community;preserve Atascadero's history;encourage sustainability; focus on actions that reduce long-term casts or will result in long- term savings;preserve open space; encourage economic vitality. 9.Additional information-see attached resume Page 2 of 2 SCOTT A. BURGESS Atasca ero, 22 Telephone; E-Mail: SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE Leadership and Management • State legislative agency director • General manager of a marine construction firm • City manager a full-service city • Directed and managed a statewide association of local governments • Managed staffs of 2 to 133 employees • Staffed boards of directors, elected bodies, and appointed boards and commissions • Managed facilities and projects requiring intergovernmental and interdisciplinary cooperation • Negotiated and directed staffs under different collective bargaining agreements Entrepreneurial, Program Development, and Planning • Planned,negotiated,financed,and managed the purchase and improvements of facilities and land Initiated,acquired legislative authorization,formed, and operated corporations for risk management, municipal investments, and emergency medical services • Planned, managed, and conducted international, statewide and regional conferences and training programs • Completed strategic plans, comprehensive land use plans, and a variety of specific master plans for infrastructure;wrote and administered community development codes • Established and reorganized organizations and major programs • Provided professional, consultant services to businesses and government Legislative Affairs and Communications • Legislative Administrator for the Oregon State Legislature • Elected twice to the West Linn City Council by the voters,and Council President by the Council • Served as a lobbyist for eight years in the state legislature; currently a legislative agency director • Wrote legislation, testified in committee hearings, and successfully lobbied for and against the passage of legislation Researched,wrote,and presented policy and technical papers for professionals, elected officials, and the general public • Designed and implemented citizen involvement and public information programs Developed and conducted conflict resolution and problem solving exercises • Made numerous public and radio and television presentations Finance • Developed and managed organization budgets in excess of$30 million • Procured funding for and managed capital projects for buildings and community infrastructure • Developed multi-million dollar risk management and investment pools • Analyzed state and federal legislation and budgets and their program and fiscal impacts • Obtained and administered federal and state grants • Negotiated contracts with state and regional agencies resulting in significant cost savings EMPLOYMENT 2008-2012 Legislative Administrator Legislative Administration Committee Oregon State Legislature Salem, Oregon 2002—2007 General Manager Advanced American Construction, Inc. Portland, Oregon AeSUm6 Scott A. Burgess Page 2 of 2 1993-2001 City Manager City of West Linn West Linn, Oregon 1992- 1993 Owner/Consultant WESTLINK Port Orford and Salem, Oregon 1988 - 1992 Executive Director Alaska Municipal League Joint Insurance Association, Inc. Juneau, Alaska 1984 - 1992 Executive Director Alaska Municipal League Juneau, Alaska 1982 - 1983 Director Department of Community Planning and Development Fairbanks North Star Borough Fairbanks, Alaska 1976 - 1982 Planning Administrator Office of Community Development City of Beaverton Beaverton, Oregon 1975 - 1976 Executive Director EMSOR, Inc. (emergency medical services) Charleston, West Virginia 1973 - 1975 Health Planner Health Planning Council, Inc. Charleston,West Virginia EDUCATION 1982 Master of Public Portland State University Administration Portland, Oregon 1973 Bachelor of City University of Virginia Planning Charlottesville, Virginia HONORS AND SPECIAL EXPERIENCES • Member, City of West Linn City Council, 2005—2011; Council President, 2005-2007, 2010-11; Council liaison to West Linn Task Force on Sustainability • Member, South Fork Water Board, 2005 -2011 • Member, Metro Greenspaces Policy Advisory Committee,2005 -2007 • President, Oregon City and County Management Association, 1999-2000 Chairman, Host Committee, ICMA 1999 Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon • Member, Strategic Planning Committee, Hatfield School of Government, Portland State university, 1999 • Businessman of the Year, West Linn Chamber of Commerce, 1996 • Commissioner, Port of Port Orford, 1992 • Honored by the 17(f'Alaska Legislature for my service with the Alaska Municipal League, May 5, 1992 • Chairman,Alaska Legislative Task f=orce on Governmental Rales, 1991 to 1992 Member, Advisory Council for the Center of Management and Public Administration, University of Alaska Southeast, 1990 to 1992 • Board Member, National League of Cities, 1985 to 1987 • Lived in U.S_ Foreign Service posts in Beirut, Lebanon; Salzburg,Austria; Belize City, Belize; and, Montreal, Canada, 1952 to 1968 ITEM NUMBER: C - DATE: 03/26/13 �a CAD Atascadero City Council Staff Report — Public Works Department Consolidated Fixed Route Transit Service "Term Sheet" Approval RECOMMENDATION: Council approve the "Term Sheet" between the Cities of Atascadero and Paso Robles, the County of San Luis Obispo, the San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority (RTA) and the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) which defines the roles, responsibilities and financial commitments in connection with the implementation of consolidated fixed route local and regional service in North San Luis Obispo County. A legally binding agreement will be brought back to the Council at a later date once all councils and boards have considered the Term Sheet and the outlined program for consolidation. DISCUSSION: On May 8, 2012 Council received a presentation from Nelson / Nygaard Consulting Associates, authors of the North County Transit Plan. At that time, the consultant provided an overview of the Plan along with recommendations for enhancing, consolidating and monitoring transit services in the North County. The final report was presented to the SLOCOG Board on June 6, 2012. Since that time, the North County Technical Committee, comprised of representatives of SLOCOG, RTA and the cities of Atascadero and Paso Robles, have met to negotiate the terms and conditions of the potential implementation of consolidated transit service in the North County. Public participation in this process, beginning with the North County Transit Plan over two years ago, has been extensive. Most recently staff solicited comments regarding the proposed consolidation and held a public workshop to answer questions and concerns before moving forward. All comments received were in favor of consolidation for many of the reasons listed in the study. ITEM NUMBER: C - 2 DATE: 03/26/13 Throughout the study and subsequent negotiation process, the City emphasized the importance of the following: • Retention of local control • Cost effective service • Elimination of duplicate fixed route service on the EI Camino Real corridor • Continued operation of Atascadero Dial-a-Ride • Protection of Local Transportation Funds (LTF) for road maintenance. The alternative selected results in the consolidation of the entire Paso Robles transit operation and only Atascadero's fixed route operation, leaving the City to continue to operate its Dial-a-Ride (DAR) service. It estimates that this consolidation would result in an estimated initial annual savings of $364,000 to the North County Providers. This savings is a result of eliminating duplicate fixed route service in both Paso Robles and Atascadero. However, the proposed consolidation of fixed route and retention of DAR will present future challenges for the City. Historically the City relied on fixed route service revenue to meet the overall transit operation required fare box recovery ratio (typically 20%). Historically DAR has struggled to realize a ratio of 12% to 15% on its own. During MOU development, staff actively sought sustainable solutions for the City's DAR operation. Staff has estimated the increased overhead of a "DAR Only" scenario at $37,621. The North County Technical Committee agreed to increase City transit revenue off the top of anticipated consolidation savings in that amount, and lower the fare box recovery ratio to 15%. The purpose of the Term Sheet is to define the roles, responsibilities and financial commitments in connection with the implementation of consolidated fixed route local and regional service in North San Luis Obispo County. A legally binding agreement will be brought back to the Council at a later date once all Councils and Boards have considered the Term Sheet and the outlined program for consolidation. The major components are: • Service Improvements and Reduced Costs - A portion of the annual cost savings, not to exceed $50,000 in the first fiscal year, shall be used to fund one additional Route 9 express run. The net reduced costs, or savings, will be split 45% to Paso Robles and 55% to Atascadero (see Figure 13, Page 13 of Attachment 2 — "Optional Methodologies for Distribution of Cost Savings"). • Vehicles and Capital Equipment — The Cities shall transfer title of their fixed route vehicles to RTA. Bus stop signs, benches and other minor capital equipment projects will be developed as part of the annual RTA capital budget-making process. RTA will be responsible for the cleaning and maintenance of all local transit passenger amenities. ITEM NUMBER: C - 2 DATE: 03/26/13 • Atascadero Dial-A-Ride — This service will continue to operate with the required farebox ratio reduced from 20% to 15%. The additional administrative costs incurred as a stand-alone service will make it a challenge to meet 15% and performance will be closely monitored. • Technical Committee and Policy Oversight — The North County Urbanized Technical Committee formed for the North County Transit Plan will continue to function as the lead body for planning and oversight of the consolidated service. The Committee consists of staff from the City of Atascadero, the City of Paso Robles, RTA and SLOCOG. FISCAL IMPACT: Consolidation of fixed route services in the North County is expected to realize an annual cost savings to the North County providers of $364,000 the first fiscal year. From this savings an additional Route 9 express run at a cost not to exceed $50,000 per year will be funded. Staff has negotiated $37,621 to cover the additional Dial-A- Ride overhead costs. The remaining $276,379 is to be split 45% to Paso Robles and 55% to Atascadero. Estimated Cost Savings: Gross Operational Savings by Consolidating Fixed Route: $364,000 Additional Route 9 Express Run: -$ 50,000 $314,000 Additional Funds to Atascadero Dial-a-Ride: -$ 37,621 Net Overall Operational Savings $276,379 First Year Paso Robles - 45% Share: $124,371 First Year Atascadero - 55% Share: $152,008 ALTERNATIVES: Do not participate in fixed route consolidation. Continue to operate local service as is with the probability of incurring penalties for failure to meet required farebox ratios. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Term Sheet 2. Nelson Nygaard, White Paper on Optional Methodologies for Distribution of Cost Savings. ITEM NUMBER: C - 2 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 1 Attachment 1 Term Sheet,North County Transit Consolidation Parties • City of Atascadero(Atascadero) • City of Paso Robles(Paso Robles) • County of San Luis Obispo(County) • San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority(RTA) • San Luis Obispo Council of Governments(SLOCOG) Purpose • To set forth the roles.responsibilities and financial connnitments in connection with the implementation of consolidated fixed route local and regional service in North San Luis Obispo County. • This Term Sheet reflects the intentions of all parties to proceed with implementation of the preferred option known as Alternative 3B,defined in the 2012 North County Transit Plan.It consists of consolidated fixed route services in North County and Dial-A- Ride services in Paso Robles to be operated by RTA. Term of Azreemnemt . This agreement shall cover a minimum of a five-year tinmefranme. The agreement shall be effective on May 1.2014 and shall continue.until or unless terminated earlier as provided herein. RTA will furnish sufficient personnel to complete all phases of the tasks.The service performance will be evaluated each year. The term will be automatically extended annually starting on July 1.2019.umless the agreement is ternnimmated as described below. • Either party may terminate this agreement at any time by giving the other party One Hundred Eighty(180)days written notice of such termination.Termination shall have no effect upon the rights and obligations of the parties arising out of the transaction occurring prior to the effective date of such termination.RTA shall be paid for all work satisfactorily completed prior to the effective date of such termination. • If.through any cause within its control.either party fails to fiilfill in a timely and professional manner its obligations under this Agreement.or if either party violates any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement.either party shall have the right to terminate the agreement immediately upon giving written notice thereof to the party.Termination shall have no effect upon the rights and obligations of the parties arising out of any transaction occurring prior to the effective date of such termination.RTA shall be paid for all work satisfactorily completed prior to the effective date of such termination. ITEM NUMBER: C - 2 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 1 Sharing of Cost- • A total of$364.379 is saved if all North County services are Savings operated under RTA.The City of Atascadero will retain operation of its Dial-A-Ride: so$38,000 is reduced from the calculated savings. The net cost savings is agreed to be$326.379. • The$326,379 reduced costs will be split 47%to Paso Robles ($153,398)and 53%to Atascadero($172,980). • North County services will be funded by a variety of sources including FTA Section 5307, Small Transit Intensive Cities (STIC).TDA.STA and a subsidy from Cuesta College in addition to Passenger Fares. • A portion of the overall annual cost savings(or costs deferred) not to exceed$50.000 in the first fiscal year shall be used to find one additional Route 9 express roundtrip in the first year the nen- service is rolled out in FY 2014x'15:this annual finding would be provided by the North Countyjurisdictions for the life of this agreement. • Ridership and financial data for this additional new express run will be nuoiutored and reported electronically by RTA to the North County Urbanized Technical Conunittee on a quarterly basis.In the 2d year.FY 2015/16.another express run would be introduced assuming it is justified by ridership demand and agreed to by all parties. Atascadero • Atascadero agrees to participate on the Policy Oversight and Responsibilities Technical Committee.which is comprised of staff members from all of the Parties to this agreement. • Atascadero shall transfer title of its El Camino Shuttle fleet to RTA for demand response use the North County. • Atascadero Dial-A-Ride would continue as a stand-alone service and will be operated by the City of Atascadero.It will incur minor additional administrative costs that will make it challenging to achieve the newly required 15%farebox recovery ratio.Atascadero will negotiate with SLOCOG on a mutually acceptable reduced farebox ratio for a period of one to two years. During this time.the parties will review the service quality and performance of Paso Robles Dial-A-Ride under an RTA operation.Based on the evaluation.Atascadero might consider transitioning the Atascadero Dial-A-Ride to RTA. 2 ITEM NUMBER: C - 2 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 1 Paso Robles • Paso Robles agrees to participate on the Policy Oversight and Responsibilities Technical Committee.which is comprised of staff members from all of the Parties to this agreement. • Paso Robles shall transfer title of its vehicles to RTA.which will operate them in North County. Count.Responsibilities . County agrees to participate on the Policy Oversight and Technical Committee which is comprised of staff members from all of the Parties to this agreement. RTA Responsibilities . RTA agrees to participate on the Policy Oversight and Technical Committee.which is comprised of staff members fiom all of the Parties to this agreement. • RTA will need tNvo new positions to operate all fixed route services in North County and general public dial-a-ride services ui Paso Robles:a Transit Supervisor and Road Supervisor. Since the Transit Supervisor position will have similar roles and responsibilities to the Paso Robles Transit Services Coordinator position. RTA will negotiate with Paso Robles to transfer the majority of the salary and benefits costs to RTA. The two positions should be tilled before the end of the second half of FY 2013114.several months in advance of the start of the service consolidation when the new service is scheduled for implementation preferably in May 2014.A Hiring Committee will be formed by RTA and include representatives from Atascadero. Paso Robles.County.RTA and SLOCOG to fill the Transit Supervisor position. • To the extent possible under the Collective Bargaining Agreement.priority for the staffmg of driver positions on local Paso Robles routes should be given to current drivers of these routes.provided the current diners possess all qualifications required by RTA. • RTA will develop a plan_for where and how the North County fleet will be maintained after it is transferred to RTA.Factors to consider include costs(maintenance costs/mile.deadhead mileage. storage.service deployment(fixed route and Dial-A- Ride)and other special 3 ITEM NUMBER: C - 2 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 1 RTA Responsibilities circumstances).Atascadero.Paso Robles and RTA must agree to (Continued) this plan. • RTA will collect data and prepare electronic quarterly reports documenting key performance indicators agreed to by all parties. The Policy Oversight and Technical Committee shall monitor the service and if warranted.then the parties shall mutually agree to make modifications to the service. SLOCOG . SLOCOOG agrees to participate on the Policy Oversight and Responsibilities Technical Committee. • SLOCOG agrees to negotiate with Atascadero to determine an acceptable alternate farebox recovery ratio for the Atascadero Dial-A-Ride service. Miscellaneous . Planning—The senvice schedules for local.regional and express routes will be finalized including agreed upon service levels within each jurisdiction. The proposed bus stops for the regional and express service will be identified. • Fares—The fiill base fare on local fixed route service in Paso Robles and on the Atascadero Saturday Traveler will be$1.50 in the initial years of the transition.A 50%discount will be offered to eligible seniors and people with disabilities.The RTA Route 9 fares are distance-based and range between$1.50 and$3.00.The RTA 31-day passes will be accepted on the local North County services:those will replace current monthly passes on the municipal systems as well as the current need to secure Regional 31 day passes to travel across systems.Also part of the service integration will be acceptance of discount passes for K-12 students.It is expected that the free ride program for Cuesta students will remain in place for all North County transit services. • Vehicles—All fixture replacement and expansion vehicles needed exclusively for North County transit services will be partially fimded using State or Federal firnds:the local share by jurisdiction will be negotiated as part of the annual budget-making process. • Other Capital Equipment—Bus stop signs.benches and other required minor capital equipment projects will be developed as part of the annual RTA capital budget-making process.Minor capital project costs will be shared between Atascadero.Paso Robles.County and RTA:the proportional jurisdiction amounts 4 ITEM NUMBER: C - 2 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 1 Miscellaneous will be negotiated as part of the annual capital budget-making (Continued) process.All four entities will partner on seeking non-TDA fluids to fiilly implement these minor capital projects.RTA will be responsible for the cleaning and maintenance of all local transit passenger amenities. • Marketing—Marketing activities.promotional materials.printed schedules.etc.will be developed cooperatively by Regional RideshareiSLOCOG.Atascadero.Paso Robles.County and RTA. RTA will have the lead on the marketing program with local input from each City and regional input fiom Regional Rideshare. Efforts will be made to achieve economies of scale in the design and production costs for the north county transit marketing program.This may entail cost sharing involving RTA and Regional Rideshare • Policy Oversight and Technical Committee—The North County Urbanized Technical Committee formed for the North County Transit Plan will continue to finction as the lead body for planning and oversight of the consolidated service.The Committee shall consist of staff from Atascadero.Paso Robles. County.RTA and SLOCOG. The Committee will review and monitor the service and make recommendations to the RTA Board regarding any changes to the consolidated fixed route and dial-a-ride services.fares and other important elements.The RTA Board has final decision-making authority. • Amendment—This agreement may be amended by the«-ntten consent of all parties ITEM NUMBER: C -2 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 2 Attachment 2 0 1 Sun Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) White Paper on Optional Methodologies for Distributing Cost Savings — Consolidated Service North County Service Plan January 11 , 2013 NEl50N tiVGAA'iD ITEM NUMBER: C -2 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 2 Wlate Paper on Optional Methodologies for Dishibv6mg Cod Savings—Censo1kkd d Sfviw No0h County Swvk*Plan !in Luis Obispo Lvunal of lovernrnents(SLOCOG) OPTIONAL METHODOLOGIES FOR DISTRIBUTING COST SAVINGS INTRODUCTION Based on the findings from the North County Transportation Plan(adopted 2o12),the preferred alternative(313)describes a fixed route cost swings of approximately S364,000 as a result of service consolidation.The cost swings are the result of consolidating Paso Robles and Ataseadero fixed route services under the RTA and eliminating duplicative services on select corridors in North County.The plan calls for a slight increase in Dial-A-Ride costs due to additional administrative costs associated urith the City of Atascadero operating it as a stand-alone service.%%*hen combining the fixed route cost savings ulth the increased Dial-A-Ride costs,the net cost swings(as compared to existing)is approximately$326,380_ This%%rite paper is untended to describe ho%v the cost s-Mings of$326,380 could be distributed to the three entities that contribute to transit services in North County.These include the City of Atascadero, City of Paso Robles and San Luis Obispo County. Use of TDA Funds For most California transit services,TDA funds are the largest single source of operating revenue; operations in North County are no exception.TDA Local Transportation Funds(LTF)are intended to be "transit first"funding,meaning tl►at ftmds are expected to be spent on transit projects to the extent that such projects are needed to fill all"transit needs that are reasonable to meet".There is no universally accepted definition of"reasonable to meet",and individual jurisdictions must make their own determination.The San Luis Obispo Council of Government(SLOCOG)administers an annual"unmet needs-process to ensure that all reasonable transit needs are nnet.TDA funds can be used for capital expenditures or operations or a combination thereof,and,importantly,they pro%ide an important source of local match for federal transit capital or operations funding. The follouing figure outlines the average composition of LTF fund expenditures in North County o%er the past three}ears.When averaging fiscal years 2010-2012,2011-2012,2012-2013(projected),San Luis Obispo County(including all areas under its jurisdiction),gill spend approximately$3.36 million in LTF funds,«ith 71%going towards transit services.Atascadero spends approximately$878.o00,Where just over half goes to%,,w&transit.Finally.Paso Robles uill annually spend approximately$9i2,000 LTF funds.The vast majority of these funds(98%),MU go tonards transit service. NelsonNygaard Consuflutq Aswoates Inc I t ITEM NUMBER: C -2 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 2 White Paper on Opiionar Methodologies for Disintxfing Cosi Savings—Consokkded Service North County Service Plan San Luis Obispo CounrAl of Govemmenb lSL000Gj Figure t Local Transportation Fund Usage in North County(Fiscal Year Average 2010.2013)' Local Transportation Funds (2010-2013 toes. oo, 60% —029% o% eo% 50% •; . 30% 10% M► San Un ObWo Carty Atascadelo Paso Rabies S3 363 644 $877964 5911 940 ■Ttyrrt Otrroi GUIDING PRINCIPLES the following guiding principles,endorsed by the North County Technical Committee,are intended to guide boy.•cost sa%inngs should be redistributed runongst the three entities Tbey are: n. First-Year Estimated Cost Savings is S326,379 and shall be re-calculated when budgets for FY 2014/15 are adopted. 2 Formula based on service quantity(hours or miles)shall be based on fixed route services only. 3. County niches any sayings in unincorpornted study area lx,invested in tmiIn orporated service arra transit scr%icm. 4 Total Umual Cost Sayings(net of service costs)split between Atascaderoand Paso Robles and RTA. 5. Atasmdero and Paso Robles have total authority in how they-use"cost swings within pnrrnnetetx of TDA rules and regulations. 6. The North County jurisdictions can apply cost sa%ings towards additional ser%ices in North County.The RTA must apply cost san ngs toward additional services or capital projects. 7. SLOCOG will ensure flexibility in calculating the Atascadero DAR Farebox Recovery Ratio. METHODOLOGIES FOR DISTRIBUTING COST SAVINGS Based on the principles listed above,this section presents several proposed methods for distributing anticipated cost sa\•in&s resulting from transit seduce consolidation in North County.A different,yet separate question is how funding should be allocated between the three jurisdictions in North County. Among the methods described in this section,no single option reflects one"ideal-methodology.All have merit and characteristics that result in slightly different outcomes and are based on different inputs.The Other-includes audt read maranante and other rn scerenrxn transportation aeocabore Nelson-.Nygaard Consuring Associates Inc.12 ITEM NUMBER: C -2 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 2 While Popor on Opbonal MWhodologies for Distribuhng Col Savings—Consokkoed Service North County S•rvic•Pion San Luis Dbispo Council of Governments ISLOCOG) objective of analyzing different methodologies is to promote discussion and consider the possibility of hybrid methods to capture the priorities and preferences for distributing cost savings,Some key factors to consider when crafting an appropriate cost distribution methodology include: • Is it fair and equitable to all parties? • Is the methodology logical and easy to adrmntster? • Does the methodology support the preferred alternative(313)? • Does the methodology meet each jurisdiction's objectives which include; - Maintaining maximum use/flexibility of funding for all services - Maintaining same service area where ridership continues to warrant it - Continue to serve major trip generators • Does the methodology meet the above statement of principles? In the following section,seven different methods are described and anal}zed.The output of these methods is a percentage distribution that includes Atascadero,Paso Robles and unincorlwnttml portions of San Luis Obispo County and their proportional share based on the method described.The seven rue thods(A-G)are: ■ (A)Population split between jurisdictions (Paso Robles,Atascadero,and unincorporated communities in North Count•serice area) • (B)Population split between jurisdictions(Paso Robles,Atascadero and Templeton only) ■ (C)Service bouts provided within each jurisdiction • (D)Service miles provided within each jurisdiction • (E)Service stops provided within each jurisdiction • (F)Quantity of serice hours eliminated • (G)Quantity.of service miles eliminated For reference,Figure 2 and Figure 3 shoes•existing and future propnxd transit serice in North County. Figure ii,on page rr presents a summary each option including a brief description the percentage distribution for each jurisdiction and the corresponding cost savings.It should be noted that a methodology based on passenger boardings in each jurisdiction was discussed and dismissed.Collecting passenger boarding data on an annual basis is burdensome,costly and not reflective of seasonal changes in ridership. Nelson�Nygaard Consulfng Associates Itx_13 ITEM NUMBER: C - 2 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 2 White Paper on Optional Methodologies For Distnbuting Cost Savings—ConsoiidoW Service North County Service Pian 5a n Luis Gbspo Council oI overnmerls i SLGC N Figure 2 Existing North County Transit Services • bheA~U"w X11►\IFHI1litl'\I1 i 1� L t'Jw Rpp!o� SAN Lt TIS ORISK)COUNTY N si: tIn 4/ Abnodwo r �-� RTA Routs 9 Pao E,o m Rom!A 16 Paw Er�g89 Rorie C !.�IWw�MSI l.wr h Atbar�o TranaA El GrrrnO ShAk(Wbddeys onto - - AnKa0wo TraW Satudq Tr&miw YSr ilbrlr 93 swee © ParMar�t6tirlr �. Two Ceraw a 2 4 Gr•,9axww" AAilm Urban canrnuroes b Sart len OIKpe 1 aw a.ns 1111,00M R SRI Netson'tNygeard Consulting Associates Inc. 14 ITEM NUMBER: C -2 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 2 While Popo on Optional Methodologies for DishiixAing Cost Savings—ConsolldaW Service North Courtly Service Pian San Luis COspo Council of Governments 1SLOCOG) Figure 3 Proposed North County Transit Services •-i hn a.:,i� ,I�r MONTT.RLY COUN1Y ►ae now" AI gr„ .r SAN 1 I'IS OBISP1)MUM TY aae� ftncAdwo 0 0— RtARaaaf%**Cas*E*6W .a.� R1A Roar i 1lptar CounA Rsylstr' lira duo kwasm ml aceta RoahAaemP40 a MSTRaWra] t� RTARtparaCwr�fon ithurrSoo n 81 It. GMrr,R^r1 TNOWN Pont, ■ so cam*law Ann O 2 4 Crr Batrda.w t.Sr Irs tbasa �Mom UUas Cansnmaes Iw Ialr fwti Ce> ` NefsW,Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc-15 ITEM NUMBER: C -2 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 2 White Popoff on Optional Mathodologirs for Disirib fling Cost Savings–Consolidated Service North County Service Plan San Luis Otvspo Counol of Governments ISLOCOG (A,B) POPULATION SPLIT BETWEEN JURISDICTIONS "[leis method is based on the actual population split between Atascadero,Paso Robles and unincorporated portions of North San Luis Obispo County that would be served by the consolidated transit service plan. The swings would be split between the proportional shares of population in each of the three jurisdictions. Based on population estimates from the North County Transit Plan,taking 2oio and 202o data and extrapolating it for 2013,estimates ha%•e been made on population percentages for Atascadero,Paso Robles and unincorporated portions of North County(including San Miguel,Santa Margarita and Templeton).Based on these estimates,the percentage distribution for each jurisdiction is 40%,44%and 16%,rmlx-direly.Figure 4 prrnides the results of this methodology. Figure 4 Method(A)-Population Split Between Jurisdictions Jurisdiction Populatilotill Disuribution Cost Savings Allocation' Atascadero 211-120 404e $130,050 Paso Robles 30.378 444,o $145.140 Unincorporated North 10.712 1640 551.180 County(Santa Margama Sen Miguel,Templeton) As a variation on this methodology,a second approach is to distribute cost swings based on the population distribution between the major cities being sen-ed within North County-including Atascadero,Paso Robles and Templeton(not including Santa Margarita and San Miguel) Based on these estimates,the percentage distribution for each jurisdiction is 42%,47%and 119b,respectireh•i%rith the results displayed in Figure 5 below_ Figure 5 Method(B)-Population Split Behveen Jurisdictions Jurisdiction POPUMOOM Distribution Cost Savings Allocation'i Atascadero2-2 C 42°0 $137.380 Paso Robles 30.378 47% $153.320 Templeton 7,071 11% $35.680 4%Iile population data for these methods are relatively straightforward to acquire and would lea-s-e little question about accuracy-it may not be the appropriate or best metric to distribute cost sai-ings.As an example,college students who compose a proportion of the ridership may not be counted as part of local population data.Cal Poly and Cuesta College students reh•on North County transit services yet a population bn5ed formula utay not reflect their usage during the acadenu r rar. 1-fourver SIM—OG uses a population formula to allocate I TF among all jurisdictions County gide. Popu!ailion based on.Nc*icunry Transit Plan.rterpda*d for 2013 estirnated population Based on estimated cost savings of 5325 379 for omsohdeted servkes a Norte Wunty Rounded °Ibid Nelson',Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc 16 ITEM NUMBER: C - 2 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 2 White Paper on Optional Methodologies for Dishibuiiing Cost Savings—Consolidated Service North County Service Pion San Luis Obispo Council of Govefnmems;SLOCOG) (C) SERVICE QUANTITY (HOURS)5 This method is based on units of service provided%%thin each jurisdiction. For this method,a unit of service is defined as revenue service hours(time penod++drere vehicles are in fired route service).A total of iq,o42 filed route service hours are estimated for the preferred alternative(Alternative 38). Hours are then allocated between Atascadero.Paso Robles and the unincorporated county, RTA Route 9 revenue hours Hithin the City of San Luis Obispo were excluded from the analysis.The proportional share of service hours within in each junsdiction is calculated and the jurisdiction t+ith the largest proportional share will receive the largest cost saxings. To determine the service hours in each jurisdiction,calculations were made to determine the amount of "ruining time-experienced for in-service vehicles for all daily services.While this calculation is feasible,it is challenging because of service-time variability caused by factors such as congestion,loading time,and other operational considerations In the course of a service day,these factors may be small on a trip-by- trip basis,but they can quickly add up over a day-long period.Furthermore•route running time vanes on a trip-b3•-trip basis.For example,current Route g Express trips have different running times in each jurisdiction as compared to Route 9 local trips. For the estimates presented in this report,service time for each transit service was determined by using existing transit schedules and estimating the time each service spends in each jurisdiction,based on a round trip_Once the round trip proportions for each service were determined,it is multiplied by the frequent~•of each service throughout a typical service day. Since many services in North Count-(aside from services x+ithin Paso Robles and At•tscadero)travel over stretches of their route without stops(e.g.,San Luis Obispo city limit to Santa Margarita or bet+�een Atascadero to Templeton),there is a disproportion amount of time that is allocated to unincorporated portions of the county,even though no bus stop,are vathin those:segments.However,as described below, the vast majority of service hours are%ilhnr Paso Robles due to the all-day,bi-directional service provided by the current Paso Express. Based on an estimate of service hours that will be required for the preferred alternative,the percentage shares for Atascadero,Paso Robles,and unincorporated portions of North County are 1796,59%and 24% of service hours,respectively.This information and the associated cost sa+iugs allocation can be found in Figure 6_Thr findings described helow include all unincorporated areas north of Santa Margarita(based on the-proposed Route 9 scludnle).This assumes that not all trips nre scheduled to directly serve Santa Margarita and not all trips are scheduled to travel to San Miguel. Figure 6 iAethod(C)-Service Hours Split Between Jurisdictions' Annual Service Hours Jurisdiction (Estimated)- Distribution Cost Savings Allocation Atascalero 2.976 174m S55.M Paso Robles 10.338 59°o 5191 350 Unincorporated North 4.319 24°0 $79.g40 County This rnethod can be applied only to 6 ted route services and canrot be useo practcall fora dial-a{ae system ^Estmated based a+Vure se^rce r.North Coanti Excludes service south of Santa Margarita Nelson',Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc ,7 ITEM NUMBER: C -2 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 2 White Paper on Optional Methodologies for DisA rAim inq Cost Savings—Cmtsollidaled Service Nath County Service Plan San Luis Obispo Council of Governments{SLOCOG) Since Paso Robles and unincorporated county have nearly 85%of the service hours,employing service hours as the sole method may not be fair and equitable.This method may be more desirable if used in combination with other methods. (D) SERVICE QUANTITY (MILES)8 Service quantity based on service miles is similar to the previous service hour's method.The vehicle miles method is based upon service routing and number of service miles provided within the boundaries of each jurisdiction for a scheduled service day,The savings would be split beh%wrt the proportional shares of vehicle miles in each jurisdiction(with the juisdiction with the greatest number of service miles obtaining the largest share of cost savings).Because of the long-distance nature of RTA Route 9 and higher highway speeds,the unincorporated portions of the county would experience the largest portion of cost savings. Similar to determining revenue hours,this method requites estimating each route(and frequency throughout the day)and the number of miles traveled by that route in each jurisdiction.Given that routes do not frequently change,this method is relatively simple and may be easily calculated ba.ed oil route maps or Geographic Information Sy stems(GTS)resources. Based on the preferred Alternative 38 route nerirork and service schedule,it is estimated that Atascadero, Paso Robles,and unincorporated portions of the county(including portions of routes in San Luis Obispo) the mileage split is 20%,36%and 44%,respectively.This information,along with the associated cost savings allocation i<shown in Figure 7. Figure 7 Method(D)-Service Miles Split Between Jurisdictions' Annual Service Mil" Jurisdiction (Estimatodl"i Distribution Cost Savings Allocation Atascadero 72.2'8 20`^o 564,420 Paso Robes 133,169 36% $118.790 Unincorporated North 160.485 44% $143.160 County (E) SERVICE STOPS PROVIDED 1-o provide a method that reflects actual service provided within each jurisdiction,another strategy is based on the number of service stops(stop served within a service day).This turthod lakes into account the total number of bus stops in each jurisdiction and includes how often each stop is served within a service day.Stops in lituited-stop locations(such as San Miguel)are only counted based on the number of trips scheduled for each stop per day_17tis method is similar to the service hours method since it reflects service frequency(number of times a bus stop is served per day).However,it more accurately reflects the amount of actual service a jurisdiction receives based on the number of bus stops within its geographical boundaries. The service stops method is also straightforward to determine based on the physical location of a stop (within a jurisdictional boundary or not)and based on the scheduled number of trips per day stopping at "Th s meth-.d can be apdied only to Axed rove se-rres and cannot be used practcallr for a dal-a-rxde system. Esluneed bawl on future serma n Nath Ccuntj E-ckAes sernce w:1M San Luis Obispo Neisonl4ygaard ConskAr g Associates Inc.18 ITEM NUMBER: C - 2 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 2 While Paper on Optional Methodologies for Distributing Cort Savings—Consolidated Service North County Service Plan San Luis Obispo Council of Governments(SLOCOG) that location.Given the proposed route nehvork,number of stops,and stops per day,approximately 7%, 83%and io%of the service stops are within Atascadero,Paso Robles and unincorporated North County, respectively_Paso Robles has the largest proportion of stops due to the the bi-directional routes within the city limits(existing Paso Express A and B).The distribution of stops in this method and associated cost savings allocation are presented in Figure 8. Figure 8 Method(E)-Service Stops Provided in Each Jurisdictiontt Daily Jurisdiction Providled Distribution Cost Savings Allocation Atescadero 44 7% $23,740 Paso Robles 17 501 83% $270,270 Unincorporated North County 60 1D% $32,370 Based on the service stops prodded method,Paso Robles would}field the largest share of cost savings_ (F) QUANTITY OF SERVICE HOURS ELIMINATED 7ltmugh ser%ice consolidation,two semices will be eliminated in North County resulting in an overall reduction(sa%ings)of semice hours,Both the EI Camino Shuttle and Parvo Express Route C will be served by RTA Route 9 under Alterrratil-T 3B.This method determines the number and percentage of hours eliminated and allocates the cost smings aMOrdingly to each jurisdiction. 11ne two routes that will be eliminated udder Alternative 3B are Route C and the El Camino Shuttle.This anahsis determines the amount of time saved(i.e.service hours)within each jurisdiction based on those services_To simplify the analysis,the total round trip time within each jurisdiction was detertninned for each service.This round trip time reflects the future time saved as a result of service elimination of these routes in Alternative 3B. County does not counibute to El Camino Shuttle or Route C elimination. Templeton would continue to be served by the re-aligned RTA service Figure 9 Method(F)-Quantity of Service Hours Eliminated in Each Jurisdiction Estimated Schedule Time Reduced lRound Trip.Combined Paso Express Route C and El Camino Shuttle)" Distribution Cost Savings Allocation Atascadero 42 minutes 39% $128,110 Paso Robles 40 minutes 37% $122,010 Unincorporated North 25 minutes County 23% $76.260 'Estimated based or„Itematnve 38 in North County '.'This is based on 19 unique Paso Express stops Hithin Paso Robles rRoutes A and 81 t3 Estimated senxe hours saved from uithn each jlrisdiarrn are estimated usirg to proportional xhedu;e time for both Paso Express Rime C and the Ei Camoo Shuttle The times listed here represent the summed round-trip time in each r.rnsdKUon for both services Nelsorri,Nygeard Consuthng Associates Inc I Q ITEM NUMBER: C - 2 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 2 White Paper on Optional Mothodotogiea for Distributing Cost Savings—Consolidaled Swvke Nodh County Service Pla- San Les Obispo Council of Gove-nments ISLOCOGi (G) QUANTITY OF SERVICE MILES ELIMINATED Similar to the set-'ice hours elin►it►ated method,this method assigned the percentage share of ul les eliuutuated iii each jurisdiction. The ivsuhts are presented iu Figure 9 below. Figure 10 Method(G)-Quantity of Service Miles Eliminated in Each Jurisdiction Estimated Distance Reduced(Round Trip, Combined Paso Express Route C and El Camino Shuttle)14 Distribution Cost Savings Allocation Atascadero 159 43% $140.680 Paso Rabies 12.3 33% $108.550 Uruncorperated North County 8.7 24% $77.140 14 Esbmeled ser.,ce miPs saved from•NAtm each jurMiction are esameed using the propmonal distance for both Paso Express Rcute C and the EI Camino Shuttle The distances listed here represer:the summed mileage n each pnsdi:tron for bot ser%es Nelsors'-Nygaard Consulting Asscoa.es Inc I 'C, ITEM NUMBER: C - 2 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 2 s4 9 S - e 3 s Wo _ b 91 6 2 f A r M t u 4 E $ � s to PC 2 O � P W � n w s =� kA 3 §S oto f7 ITEM NUMBER: C -2 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 2 a � G /0 o a� F a � � � � v a � H C O a � 1 r C d T U f r d a i� ITEM NUMBER: C -2 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 2 While Paper on Oplional Methodologies foe Distributing Cost Savings—Consolidated Service North County Service Plan San Lincs Obispo Council of Governments tSLOCOGI HYBRID METHOD (COMBINATION OF FACTORS) The previous methods outline various approaches for.allocating cast savings between three jurisdictions in North County.An alternative strategy may be a combination of these methods to incorporate a balance of different priorities.A combination method might be based partly on population,partly on service hours,partly on serice utiles,etc.A combination of factors can be useful when a particular method fagots one entity or can be desirable to reflect the complexity involved in developing a fair and equitable formula. One disadvantage of a method or formula based on a combination of factors is that it could result in all administrative burden to recalculate out an annual basis.Ratter than an unlimited number of combinations of factors,this option will be used as a negotiation process-to make sure the forinula is fair and equitable,supports Alternative 313 and meets each cites objectives described above(see page 2). When agreement is reached on a methodology for splitting the savings,it should be considered a five-year pian rather than re-negotiating each year(unless a per-determined threshold is excer tied - i.e.,an increase of greater that'5%for Otte Or both jurisdictions would trigger a renegotiation process). Based on feedback from the three jurisdictions,a hybrid approach has been recommended by the North Cnu'ty Urbanized Technical Committee.It has also been suggested that the cost savings be split between only the cities within the service area(Atascadero and Paso Robles).The result of these calculations is shown below and is summarized in Figure 13.Rather than benefit from the cost savings,the county would benefit by service being reinstated to dowvtowv Templeton with a detailed schedule to be finalized by RTA • Using a combined and weighted averages"between Methotl B(Population split between jurisdictions)and Elethod F(Quantity of service hours eliminated),the outcoute is 51% Atascadero and 49%Paso Robles. • Using a combined and weighted average-between Jfettod B and Diethod G(Quantity of service miles eliminated),the outcome is 55%Atascadero and 45%Paso Robles. Figure 13 Summary of Hybrid Method Proposalsm Hybrid Method:Combined(6)and IF) Hybrid Method Combineid(6)and(0) Percentage Split Cost Savings Paremtage Spgt Cost Savings Distribution Distribution Atascadero 51% $165.231 55% $179.727 Paso Robles 49% $161 148 45% 5146.652 USE OF COST SAVINGS Depending on the selected method,the estimated cost sayings for each jurisdiction varies significantly. Under the hybrid method,the annual savings for Pass Robles on the low end is nearly$147,000 and for Atascadero it is S165,000.If neither of the hybrid methods are preferred,then other combinations could also be considered as described in Figure 13 alxn•e. 1e In itrS example catctlabon.15%is weghted to%wds McT.od B voth 85r eA-igMed towards Vothod F 14 In Itis exartple calWaton.15%b weghted tomirds lde+lod B ulith 85'x.-Atighiied towards Method G. M Estimated Fixed Route Cost SwmW ttra Consaldatlon S326,379 Ne+son;NyWrd Consulting.Associates Inc.1 13 ITEM NUMBER: C -2 DATE: 03/26/13 Attachment 2 White Papez on Optional Methodologies for Distributing Cost Savings—Consolidaled Service North County service Plan San L,-;:s Obcspo Cr L;nol of Governments iSLOCOG) Regardless of the final method selected,the cost savings could be used by each jurisdiction for streets/roads,transit improvements or a combination ilterm)f. &ich jurisdiction currently devotes a percentage their TDA funds for transit%%ith Paso Robles cou n sting 98%for this purpose.The consultant reconuuends that the North Counh,Technical Committee agree to reinvest at least some of the savings on transit enhancements If funds are used to enhance transit service,then the top priority for Route 9 in North County is more express service beyond the 2 northbound and 3 southbound trips in Alterative A The cost for providing one express round trip is approximately$So,000 annually. Other priorities for regional seiNice include later evening or earlier morning service ou weekdays or weekends.If cost sayings are used for local service,then the priorities are for Sunday service to Atascadero and Paso Robles or to test neer-services connecting Atascadero with Morro Bay via Highway 41 or Paso Robles to Shandon along HighWkv 46. NescnNygaard Consulting AssooMes Inc 114