HomeMy WebLinkAbout010813 CC Agenda-combined I I
e� d I IIi
iais � n N;To,
ymoo CITY OF A TASCADERO
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
Tuesday, January 8, 2013
City Hall
Council Chambers
6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, California
City Council Closed Session: 5:30 p.m.
City Council Regular Session: 6:00 p.m.
Public Financing Authoritv: Immediately following the
City Council meeting
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION: 5:30 p.m.
1. CLOSED SESSION -- PUBLIC COMMENT
2. COUNCIL LEAVES CHAMBERS TO BEGIN CLOSED SESSION
3. CLOSED SESSION -- CALL TO ORDER
a. Conference with Legal Counsel — Existing Litigation
Government Code Section 54956.9(a)
Save Atascadero v. City of Atascadero, et al.
San Luis Obispo Superior Court Case No. 128230
4. CLOSED SESSION -- ADJOURNMENT
5. COUNCIL RETURNS TO CHAMBERS
6. CLOSED SESSION -- REPORT
REGULAR SESSION — CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council Member Fonzi
ROLL CALL: Mayor O'Malley
Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant
Council Member Fonzi
Council Member Kelley
Council Member Moreno
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call
PRESENTATIONS:
1. Life-Saving Award Presented to Nathan Otter by Atascadero Fire and
Police Departments
2. Recognition of Brady Cherry, former Community Services Director, for
over 18 years of service to the City
A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (All items on the consent calendar are considered to
be routine and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion
if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If
comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the
consent calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an
opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the
item before action is taken. DRAFT MINUTES: Council meeting draft minutes
are listed on the Consent Calendar for approval of the minutes. Should anyone
wish to request an amendment to draft minutes, the item will be removed from
the Consent Calendar and their suggestion will be considered by the City
Council. If anyone desires to express their opinion concerning issues included in
draft minutes, they should share their opinion during the Community Forum
portion of the meeting.)
1. City Council / Planning Commission Special Joint Meeting Draft Action
Minutes — November 29, 2012
■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Council / Planning
Commission Special Joint Meeting Draft Action Minutes of November 29,
2012. [City Clerk]
2. City Council Draft Action Minutes — December 11, 2012
■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Draft Action Minutes
of December 11, 2012. [City Clerk]
3. City Council Special Meeting -- North County Connection Draft Action
Minutes — December 14, 2012
■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Special Meeting --
North County Connection Draft Action Minutes of December 14, 2012.
[City Clerk]
4. City Council Special Meeting — Roundtable Study Session Draft Action
Minutes — December 14, 2012
■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Special Meeting —
Roundtable Study Session Draft Action Minutes of December 14, 2012.
[City Clerk]
5. October 2012 Accounts Payable and Payroll
■ Fiscal Impact: $3,577,425.10.
■ Recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable,
payroll and payroll vendor checks for October 2012. [Administrative
Services]
6. November 2012 Accounts Payable and Payroll
■ Fiscal Impact: $6,677,172.64.
■ Recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable,
payroll and payroll vendor checks for November 2012. [Administrative
Services]
7. Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement with the San Luis Obispo
Regional Transit Authority
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council adopt the Draft Resolution approving the
amended San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority Joint Powers
Agreement. [Public Works]
8. Amendments to Salary Schedule and Approval of New Staff Positions
from Salary Savings
■ Fiscal Impact: $265,100 in net salary savings.
■ Recommendation: Council:
1. Concur with the administrative reorganization as recommended by the
City Manager, and,
2. Extend the existing salary schedule through June 30, 2013 and amend
said schedule to include the following positions:
• Senior Building Maintenance Specialist: Range 18
• Personnel Specialist- Confidential: Range 24c
• Management Analyst I- Confidential: Range 24c
• Public Works Operations Manager: Range 27
• Information Technology Manager: Range 38
[City Manager]
UPDATES FROM THE CITY MANAGER: (The City Manager will give an oral report on
any current issues of concern to the City Council.)
COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to
address the Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has
jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to three minutes. Please state your name for the
record before making your presentation. Comments made during Community Forum
will not be a subject of discussion. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for
Community Forum, unless changed by the Council. Any members of the public who
have questions or need information, may contact the City Clerk's Office, between the
hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at 470-3400, or mtorgerson(aD_atascadero.orq.)
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None.
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. 2013 Strategic Planning Update - Community Development Department/
Economic Development
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council receive and file this report.
[Community Development]
2. Eagle Ranch Specific Plan EIR Consultant Contract Amendment for
Additional Preliminary Studies
■ Fiscal Impact: The fiscal impact of EIR process on the City will be
revenue neutral.
■ Recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to negotiate and
execute change orders with Michael Brandman and Associates (MBA) for
the Eagle Ranch Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Constraints Analysis
in order to include additional preliminary studies and consultant time.
The total cost of the original contract, contract amendments and change
orders shall not exceed $300,000 for Phase 1 prior to beginning the
official EIR process. [Community Development]
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative, Council
Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities.
Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take
action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. The Council may
take action on items listed on the Agenda.)
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: (Mayor O'Malley will be assigning committee
members to the following committees):
Air Pollution Control District (APCD)
California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA) Board
City / Schools Committee (2)
Community Action Partnership of SLO County
County Mayors Round Table
Design Review Committee
Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC)
Finance Committee
Homeless Services Oversight Council
Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA)
League of California Cities — Council Liaison
League of California Cities — CITIPAC Board Member (appointed by League of CA Cities)
Oversight Board for Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment
Agency of Atascadero (Council Member Fonzi appointed by Mayor O'Malley
On December 11, 2012)
S.L.O. Council of Governments (SLOCOG)
S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority (SLORTA)
Appointments made by other entities:
Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Committee (appointed by the Governor)
Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) (appointed by City Selection
Committee)
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND / OR ACTION:
1. City Council
2. City Clerk
3. City Treasurer
4. City Attorney
5. City Manager
F. ADJOURNMENT:
Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that
person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. Correspondence submitted at this
public hearing will be distributed to the Council and available for review in the City Clerk's office.
I, Victoria Randall, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of perjury that
the foregoing agenda for the January 8, 2013 Regular Session of the Atascadero City Council was
posted on January 2, 2013, at the Atascadero City Hall, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422
and was available for public review in the Customer Service Center at that location.
Signed this 2"d day of January, 2013, at Atascadero, California.
Victoria Randall, Deputy City Clerk
City of Atascadero
City of Atascadero
WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 6:00 p.m. unless there is a
Community Redevelopment Agency meeting commencing at 6:00 p.m. in which event the Council meeting will commence
immediately following the conclusion of the Community Redevelopment Agency meeting. Council meetings will be held at
the City Hall Council Chambers, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero. Matters are considered by the Council in the order of
the printed Agenda. Regular Council meetings are televised live, audio recorded and videotaped for future playback.
Charter Communication customers may view the meetings on Charter Cable Channel 20 or via the City's website at
www.atascadero.org. Meetings are also broadcast on radio station KPRL AM 1230. Contact the City Clerk for more
information (470-3400).
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file
in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public inspection during City Hall business hours at the Front Counter of
City Hall, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, and on our website, www.atascadero.org. An agenda packet is also
available for public review at the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road. Contracts, Resolutions and Ordinances will be
allocated a number once they are approved by the City Council. The minutes of this meeting will reflect these numbers.
All documents submitted by the public during Council meetings that are either read into the record or referred to in their
statement will be noted in the minutes and available for review in the City Clerk's office.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting
or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office or the City Clerk's Office, both at (805)
470-3400. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in
assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA
Under Agenda item, "COMMUNITY FORUM", the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having business with the
Council to approach the lectern and be recognized.
1. Give your name for the record (not required)
2. State the nature of your business.
3. All comments are limited to 3 minutes.
4. All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council.
5. No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any other
individual, absent or present
This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes will be
allowed for Community Forum (unless changed by the Council). If you wish to use a computer presentation to support
your comments, you must notify the City Clerk's office at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Digital presentations must
be brought to the meeting on a USB drive or CD. You are required to submit to the City Clerk a printed copy of your
presentation for the record. Please check in with the City Clerk before the meeting begins to announce your presence
and turn in the printed copy.
TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS (from Title 2, Chapter 1 of the Atascadero Municipal Code)
Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will give their
report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is open and
will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being considered to step up to the lectern. If
you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way:
1. You must approach the lectern and be recognized by the Mayor
2. Give your name (not required)
3. Make your statement
4. All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council
5. No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any other
individual, absent or present
6. All comments limited to 3 minutes
The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public comments will be
heard by the Council.
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 01/08/13
Deis r
ASS
CITY OF ATASCADERO
CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSIO
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING
APCD PUBLIC WORKSHOP
DRAFT ACTION MINUTES
Special Meeting — Thursday, November 29, 2012 — 6:30 P.M.
Templeton Elementary School Multipurpose Room
2158 th Street, Templeton, California
CALL TO ORDER - 6:30 p.m.
ATTENDANCE:
Present: Council Members Sturtevant, Fonzi, Clay, Mayor Pro Tem
O'Malley, and Mayor Kelley
Planning Commissioners Bentz, Dariz, Vice Chairperson Schmidt,
and Chairperson Ward
Absent: Planning Commissioners Colamarino, Cooper, and Wingett
Others Present: Recording Secretary Warren Frace
Staff Present: Community Development Director, Warren Frace
Associate Planner, Callie Taylor
Assistant Planner, Alfredo Castillo
City of Atascadero
City Council/Planning Commission Special Joint Meeting of 11/29/12
Page 1 of 2
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 01/08/13
APCD SPONSORED STUDY SESSION
1. PLN 2010-1361, GREENHOUSE GAS PLANNING COMMUNITY WORKSHOP
Applicant: SLO APCD/City of Atascadero, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422
Project Title: PLN 2010-1361 Greenhouse Gas
Project Location: Citywide,Atascadero, CA 93422
Project The cities of Arroyo Grande, Atascadero, Grover Beach, Morro Bay, Pismo Beach,
Description: and Paso Robles and the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District
(APCD)are working to prepare climate action plans to cost-effectively reduce
greenhouse gas emissions,while maintaining or improving the quality of life for
residents and reducing costs for individuals and business. This is the second public
workshop sponsored by APCD to review and provide input on potential greenhouse
gas reduction strategies. This will be an open, inclusive, and collaborative process.
DISCLOSURE OF EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS:
None
The Planning Commission and City Council participated in breakout groups that
reviewed and discussed the following topics:
1) Energy efficiency
2) Transportation / Land Use
3) Solid Waste
The Planning Commission and City Council listened to the APCD moderated Q & A
session.
ADJOURNMENT — 8:05 P.M.
MINUTES PREPARD BY:
Warren Frace, Recording Secretary
City of Atascadero
City Council/Planning Commission Special Joint Meeting of 11/29/12
Page 2 of 2
ITEM NUMBER: A- 2
DATE: 01/08/13
R FT
- y
�i19y
1818 R 1979
\ CAD]Ro CITY OF ATASCADERO
CITY COUNCIL
DRAFT ACTION MINUTES
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
City Hall
Council Chambers
6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, California
6:00 P.M.
REGULAR SESSION — CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M.
Mayor Kelley called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. and Council Member Clay led the
Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Council Members Clay, Fonzi, Sturtevant, Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley
and Mayor Kelley
Absent: None
Others Present: City Clerk / Assistant to City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson
Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Administrative Services Director
Rachelle Rickard, Community Development Director Warren Frace,
Public Works Director Russ Thompson, Community Services
Director Brady Cherry, Police Commander Joe Allen, Fire Chief
Kurt Stone, and City Attorney Brian Pierik.
Atascadero City Council
Draft Action Minutes of December 11,2012
Page 1 of 5
ITEM NUMBER: A- 2
DATE: 01/08/13
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
MOTION: By Council Member Clay and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
O'Malley to approve the agenda.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
PRESENTATION:
1. Commendation to Sue Warren and North County Connection for
Support of Individuals in Recovery.
Mayor Kelley presented a Commendation to Sue Warren thanking her for her efforts for
those in need and her service to Atascadero.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. City Council Draft Action Minutes — November 27, 2012
■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Draft Action Minutes
of November 27, 2012. [City Clerk]
2. Reciting the Fact of the General Municipal Election Held on November
6, 2012.
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council adopt the Draft Resolution, reciting the fact
of the General Municipal Election held on November 6, 2012, declaring
the result and such other matters as provided by law. [City Clerk]
3. City Council 2013 Meeting Schedule
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Council meeting schedule
for 2013. [City Clerk]
MOTION: By Council Member Clay and seconded by Council Member
Sturtevant to approve the Consent Calendar.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.(Resolution No. 2012-056)
COMMUNITY FORUM:
The following citizens spoke during Community Forum: Pastor Haynes, Jerry Clay, Ray
Johnson, Mike Anderson, Pastor Steve Shively, Al Fonzi (Exhibit A), Bob Wilkins,
Dennis Schmidt, Karyn Sturtevant, Susan Warren, and Chuck Ward.
Mayor Kelley closed the COMMUNITY FORUM period.
Atascadero City Council
Draft Action Minutes of December 11,2012
Page 2 of 5
ITEM NUMBER: A- 2
DATE: 01/08/13
Mayor Kelley stated that he was honored to have served as Mayor this year. He also
thanked Jerry Clay for his support. Mayor Kelley encouraged Mr. Clay to throw his hat
into the ring for the vacancy created by Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley's election to Mayor.
OATHS OF OFFICE:
1. Administration of Oaths of Office — Newly-elected Mayor Tom O'Malley
and Council Members Roberta Fonzi and Bob Kelley will be sworn in by
City Clerk Marcia Torgerson.
City Clerk Torgerson conducted the Oath of Office for Mayor Tom O'Malley and Council
Members Roberta Fonzi and Bob Kelley.
Mayor O'Malley stated that he is thankful to be able to serve as the first elected Mayor
in his hometown and in time for the Centennial.
PRESENTATION:
1. Presentation to Outgoing Council Member Jerry Clay
Mayor O'Malley gave a tribute to former Council Member Clay, including a PowerPoint
presentation of his life and service to Atascadero.
Former Council Member Clay thanked everyone for their kind words.
CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION:
1. Options for Filling Vacancy on City Council
■ Fiscal Impact: The fiscal impact will depend on the decision of the City
Council.
■ Recommendations: City Council:
1. Nominate candidates and vote to fill the City Council vacancy; OR
2. Determine a process to fill the City Council vacancy and direct the City
Clerk to implement the process; OR
3. Direct the City Clerk to place a Resolution on the next agenda, calling
for a Special Election to fill the City Council vacancy. [City Clerk]
City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson gave the staff
report and answered questions from the Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
The following citizens spoke on this item: Jerry Clay, Mike Anderson, Don Ritter, Dave
May, Bob Wilkins, Heather Moreno, and Dennis Schmidt.
Atascadero City Council
Draft Action Minutes of December 11,2012
Page 3 of 5
ITEM NUMBER: A- 2
DATE: 01/08/13
Mayor O'Malley closed the Public Comment period.
There was Council discussion on this issue. Former Council Member Jerry Clay asked
if he could speak again. Mayor O'Malley stated that he would make an exception and
re-open the public comment period for Mr. Clay, without setting a precedent.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Jerry Clay asked to be appointed to the vacant position.
Mayor O'Malley closed the Public Comment period.
MOTION: By Council Member Fonzi and seconded by Council Member
Sturtevant to appoint Heather Moreno to fill the City Council
vacancy.
Motion passed 3:1 by a roll-call vote. (Kelley opposed)
City Clerk Torgerson conducted the Oath of Office for Council Member Heather Moreno.
2. Council Appointment of Mayor Pro Tem. The new Mayor will accept
nominations from the Council Members and will appoint a Mayor Pro
Tem.
Mayor O'Malley asked if there was any public comment.
PUBLIC COMMENT: Jerry Clay, and Sue Warren.
Mayor O'Malley closed the Public Comment period.
Mayor O'Malley called for nominations for Mayor Pro Tem.
MOTION: By Council Member Kelley and seconded by Council Member
Fonzi to appoint Council Member Sturtevant as Mayor Pro
Tem.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
UPDATES FROM THE CITY MANAGER:
City Manager Wade McKinney gave an update on projects and issues within the City.
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None.
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: None.
Atascadero City Council
Draft Action Minutes of December 11,2012
Page 4 of 5
ITEM NUMBER: A- 2
DATE: 01/08/13
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS:
The City Council Members made brief announcements.
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS:
Manor Pro Tem Sturtevant
1. City / Schools Committee — Working on the Education Specifications
Committees being formulated from the Junior High and the Fine Arts
Academy.
2. League of California Cities — Council Liaison — In January 2013, the City
Council Members will be attending the League's New Mayor and City Council
Conference in Sacramento.
Council Member Kelley
1. Lighthouse Project — Council Member Kelley has shared with the other
Mayors in the County information about the Lighthouse Project, as they are all
very interested in the Program.
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND / OR ACTION:
City Council
Mayor O'Malley — Announced that he is appointing Roberta Fonzi and Wade
McKinney to the Atascadero Oversight Board.
F. ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor O'Malley adjourned the meeting at 7:33 p.m.
MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C.
City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager
The following exhibit is available for review in the City Clerk's office:
Exhibit A— Handout from Al Fonzi
Atascadero City Council
Draft Action Minutes of December 11,2012
Page 5 of 5
ITEM NUMBER: A- 3
DATE: 01/08/13
SPECIAL MEETING
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
Friday, December 14, 2012
12:30 p.m.
City of Atascadero City Hall
6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, California
DRAFT ACTION MINUTES
ROLL CALL:
Present: Council Members Fonzi, Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant, and Mayor
O'Malley
Absent: Council Members Kelley and Moreno
Others Present: City Clerk / Assistant to City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson
Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Administrative Services Director
Rachelle Rickard, and Finance Technician Lynda Horejsi.
MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. North County Connection In-Lieu Affordable Housing Fund Allocation
Fiscal Impact:
Recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute
any additional agreements necessary for $100,000 from the In-Lieu Affordable
Housing Fund to North County Connection for one low-income affordable
housing unit on the property at 8600 Atascadero Avenue.
Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard gave the staff report and answered
questions from the Council.
The City Council had questions about the extension and the confusion on the need for a
commercial appraisal.
PUBLIC COMMENT: None
City of Atascadero
City Council Special Meeting of 12/14/12
Page 1 of 2
ITEM NUMBER: A- 3
DATE: 01/08/13
Rabobank representative Carol Bezkostny was called and the Council asked her
questions over the phone.
There was Council consensus to recess the meeting to 2:05 p.m. to allow staff
to acquire additional information.
Mayor O'Malley recessed the meeting at 12:56 p.m.
Mayor O'Malley reconvened the meeting at 2:12 p.m.
Ms. Bezkostny attended the reconvened meeting and answered additional questions
from the Council.
Applicant Sue Warren also answered questions from the Council.
MOTION: By Council Member Fonzi and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Sturtevant to authorize the City Manager to negotiate and
execute any additional agreements necessary for $100,000
from the In-Lieu Affordable Housing Fund to North County
Connection for one low-income affordable housing unit on the
property at 8600 Atascadero Avenue.
Motion passed 3:0 by a roll-call vote.
ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor O'Malley adjourned the meeting at 2:42 p.m.
MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C.
City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager
City of Atascadero
City Council Special Meeting of 12/14/12
Page 2 of 2
ITEM NUMBER: A- 4
DATE: 01/08/13
SPECIAL MEETING
Atascadero City Council
Roundtable Study Session
Friday, December 14, 2012, at 1 :00 p.m.
City Hall Council Chambers
6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero
DRAFT ACTION MINUTES
Mayor O'Malley called the meeting to order at 1:04 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Council Member Fonzi, Mayor Pro Tem Sturtevant and Mayor
O'Malley
Absent: Council Members Kelley and Moreno
Others Present: City Clerk / Assistant to City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson
City of Atascadero
Special Meeting — Roundtable Study Session of 12/14/12
Page 1 of 2
ITEM NUMBER: A- 4
DATE: 01/08/13
Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Zoo Director Alan Baker, and
Recreation Coordinator Audrey Banks.
ROUNDTABLE STUDY SESSION:
1 . Promotions Report
Mental Marketing/TJA Advertising summarized Phase I of their efforts to familiarize
themselves with Atascadero. They also shared their process for formulating a
promotional plan for Atascadero.
Invitees: Grigger Jones, Larry Wysong, Jim Wilkins, Linda Hendy, Amar Sohi, Pam
Lyons, J.P. Patel, Joel Clay, Frank Rimkus, Deena Alexander, Cory Black, and Stacie
Jacobs.
MM/TJA answered questions and collected suggestions.
ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor O"Malley adjourned the meeting at 2:05 p.m.
MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C.
City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager
City of Atascadero
Special Meeting — Roundtable Study Session of 12/14/12
Page 2 of 2
ITEM NUMBER: A - 5
' DATE: 01/08/13
-Alascadero Citi Council
Staff Report - Administrative Services Department
October 2012 Accounts Payable and Payroll
RECOMMENDATION:
Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for
October 2012.
DISCUSSION:
Attached for City Council review and approval are the following:
Payroll
Dated 10/11/12 Checks # 29945 - 29968 $ 12,934.35
Direct Deposits 271,883.58
Dated 10125/12 Checks # 29969 - 29993 13,445.70
Direct Deposits 236,965.41
Accounts Payable
Dated 10/1/12 - 10/31/12
Checks # 134839 - 135160
& EFTs 1178 - 1192 3,042,196.06
TOTAL AMOUNT $ 3,577,425.10
FISCAL IMPACT:
Total expenditures for all funds is $ 3,577,425.10
CERTIFICATION:
The undersigned certifies that the attached demands have been released for payment
and that funds are available for these demands:
ffaa }t/) yfrM1
Rache!'e Rickard. Director o'f Administrative Services
ATTACHMENT:
October 2012 Eden Warrant Register in the amount of $ 3,042,196.06
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of October 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
1178 10/02/2012 RABOBANK, N.A. Payroll Vendor Payment 53,546.08
1179 10/02/2012 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 14,519.35
1180 10/02/2012 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1,315.67
134839 10/04/2012 ALLSTATE WORKPLACE DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 3,506.64
134840 10/04/2012 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA Accounts Payable Check 133,525.00
134841 10/04/2012 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS CO Payroll Vendor Payment 907.33
134842 10/04/2012 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES Payroll Vendor Payment 1,608.40
134843 10/04/2012 PREFERRED BENEFITS INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 9,617.68
134844 10/04/2012 SDRMA Payroll Vendor Payment 143,884.39
134845 10/05/2012 ACTIVE NETWORK, INC. Accounts Payable Check 45.05
134846 10/05/2012 KEITH AGGSON Accounts Payable Check 230.00
134847 10/05/2012 AGP VIDEO, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,960.00
134848 10/05/2012 KATJAAHLSTROM Accounts Payable Check 45.00
134849 10/05/2012 AIRFLOW FILTER SERVICE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 111.10
134850 10/05/2012 AIRGAS USA, LLC Accounts Payable Check 117.74
134851 10/05/2012 ALL SIGNS AND GRAPHICS, LLC Accounts Payable Check 86.51
134852 10/05/2012 ALLAN HANCOCK COLLEGE Accounts Payable Check 127.00
134853 10/05/2012 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC Accounts Payable Check 176.15
134854 10/05/2012 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC. Accounts Payable Check 144.33
134855 10/05/2012 ALPHA FIRE SPRINKLER CORP. Accounts Payable Check 33,829.14
134856 10/05/2012 ALTHOUSE&MEADE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 847.50
134857 10/05/2012 AMERICAN MARBORG Accounts Payable Check 187.20
134858 10/05/2012 AMERICAN WEST TIRE &AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 103.62
134859 10/05/2012 AMI PIPE&SUPPLY, INC. Accounts Payable Check 44.46
134860 10/05/2012 ARCHIE'S ALOHA PEST MGMT. Accounts Payable Check 375.00
134861 10/05/2012 PEGGYARCHULETA Accounts Payable Check 35.00
134862 10/05/2012 KELLYAREBALO Accounts Payable Check 939.91
134863 10/05/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 814.49
134864 10/05/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 899.50
134865 10/05/2012 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 185.40
134866 10/05/2012 ATASCADERO TRAFFIC WAY STORAGE Accounts Payable Check 660.00
134867 10/05/2012 JENAMARIE P. BAIRD Accounts Payable Check 122.50
134868 10/05/2012 TOM BIRKENFELD Accounts Payable Check 45.00
134869 10/05/2012 BLUEPRINTER Accounts Payable Check 63.02
134870 10/05/2012 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC Accounts Payable Check 101.22
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of October 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
134871 10/05/2012 SHIRLEY R. BRUTON Accounts Payable Check 210.00
134872 10/05/2012 CASEY BRYSON Accounts Payable Check 360.16
134873 10/05/2012 BURKE,WILLIAMS, &SORENSON LLP Accounts Payable Check 15,075.25
134874 10/05/2012 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 551.07
134875 10/05/2012 BUTLER BUSINESS MACHINES Accounts Payable Check 297.05
134876 10/05/2012 CA BUILDING STANDARDS COMM. Accounts Payable Check 314.10
134877 10/05/2012 CALPORTLAND CONSTRUCTION Accounts Payable Check 393,147.64
134878 10/05/2012 CDCE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 453.64
134879 10/05/2012 BRADY CHERRY Accounts Payable Check 351.00
134880 10/05/2012 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 80.00
134881 10/05/2012 COAST ELECTRONICS Accounts Payable Check 4,872.53
134882 10/05/2012 COASTAL REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 715.90
134883 10/05/2012 CORELOGIC INF. SOLUTIONS, INC, Accounts Payable Check 100.00
134884 10/05/2012 NICHOLAS E. COUGHLIN Accounts Payable Check 179.00
134885 10/05/2012 COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Accounts Payable Check 12,891.99
134886 10/05/2012 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 111.10
134887 10/05/2012 DAVEY RESOURCE GROUP Accounts Payable Check 285.00
134888 10/05/2012 BRIAN S. DAVIN, JR. Accounts Payable Check 324.00
134889 10/05/2012 DANIELA. DAVIS Accounts Payable Check 367.50
134890 10/05/2012 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Accounts Payable Check 1,010.27
134891 10/05/2012 DIANI BUILDING CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 667,094.50
134892 10/05/2012 CHARLES DICKEY Accounts Payable Check 78.00
134893 10/05/2012 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY CORP. Accounts Payable Check 3,599.46
134894 10/05/2012 DOCUTEAM Accounts Payable Check 168.24
134895 10/05/2012 DOGGIE WALK BAGS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 282.51
134896 10/05/2012 DORMAN HYDRO SEEDING Accounts Payable Check 780.00
134897 10/05/2012 DRIVE CUSTOMS Accounts Payable Check 5,748.13
134898 10/05/2012 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SPEC., INC. Accounts Payable Check 40.00
134899 10/05/2012 EMS PERSONNEL FUND Accounts Payable Check 200.00
134900 10/05/2012 ESCUELA DEL RIO Accounts Payable Check 80.00
134901 10/05/2012 JENNIFER FANNING Accounts Payable Check 11.42
134902 10/05/2012 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 38.63
134903 10/05/2012 FEDERAL EXPRESS Accounts Payable Check 148.55
134904 10/05/2012 FERRAVANTI GRADING & PAVING Accounts Payable Check 24,806.41
134905 10/05/2012 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 143.12
134906 10/05/2012 FLUID RESOURCE MANAGEMENT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,176.00
134907 10/05/2012 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 58.72
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of October 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
134908 10/05/2012 WARREN FRACE Accounts Payable Check 300.00
134909 10/05/2012 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 297.72
134910 10/05/2012 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 357.26
134911 10/05/2012 GILBERT'S LANDSCAPES Accounts Payable Check 407.91
134912 10/05/2012 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 9.46
134913 10/05/2012 GROUND UP DESIGN&CONST. MGMT Accounts Payable Check 6,637.50
134914 10/05/2012 BRADLEYA. HACKLEMAN Accounts Payable Check 763.65
134915 10/05/2012 EDDIE L. HARRIS Accounts Payable Check 57.00
134916 10/05/2012 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 77.20
134917 10/05/2012 TRAVIS HASCH Accounts Payable Check 250.00
134918 10/05/2012 JENE HINTON-RAILSBACK Accounts Payable Check 125.00
134919 10/05/2012 HOME DEPOT Accounts Payable Check 983.06
134920 10/05/2012 IMPACT ABSORBENTS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 305.66
134921 10/05/2012 EVELYN R. INGRAM Accounts Payable Check 714.25
134922 10/05/2012 INHOUSE SECURITY SERVICE, LLC Accounts Payable Check 1,780,63
134923 10/05/2012 JK'S UNLIMITED Accounts Payable Check 188.66
134924 10/05/2012 JOE A. GONSALVES&SON Accounts Payable Check 3,000,00
134925 10/05/2012 JOEBELLA COFFEE Accounts Payable Check 60.00
134926 10/05/2012 KARP LAND SURVEYS Accounts Payable Check 2,192.50
134927 10/05/2012 KPRL 1230 AM Accounts Payable Check 320.00
134928 10/05/2012 L.N. CURTIS& SONS Accounts Payable Check 84.24
134929 10/05/2012 LEHIGH HANSON Accounts Payable Check 322.58
134930 10/05/2012 JAMES R. LEWIS Accounts Payable Check 352.00
134931 10/05/2012 ANDREW LUERA Accounts Payable Check 200.00
134932 10/05/2012 MANUEL MADRIGAL Accounts Payable Check 219.00
134933 10/05/2012 MADRONE LANDSCAPES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 200.00
134934 10/05/2012 MAINLINE UTILITY CO. Accounts Payable Check 525.00
134935 10/05/2012 ERIN MCGRATH Accounts Payable Check 933.28
134936 10/05/2012 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 913.97
134937 10/05/2012 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. Accounts Payable Check 384.96
134938 10/05/2012 MID-COAST GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,650.00
134939 10/05/2012 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW, INC. Accounts Payable Check 163.77
134940 10/05/2012 MID-STATE SOLID WASTE& RECYCG Accounts Payable Check 304.96
134941 10/05/2012 MILLENNIUM CONSULTING ASSC. Accounts Payable Check 1,319.88
134942 10/05/2012 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 839.12
134943 10/05/2012 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 650.22
134944 10/05/2012 REON C MONSON Accounts Payable Check 204.00
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of October 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
134945 10/05/2012 MICHAL S. MOSES Accounts Payable Check 1,098.05
134946 10/05/2012 NATIONAL FIRE FIGHTER WILDLAND Accounts Payable Check 899.02
134947 10/05/2012 OFFICE DEPOT INC. Accounts Payable Check 283.70
134948 10/05/2012 ONTRAC Accounts Payable Check 14.44
134949 10/05/2012 PACIFIC COAST GYMNASTICS CENTE Accounts Payable Check 257.60
134950 10/05/2012 DEAN PERICIC Accounts Payable Check 295.64
134951 10/05/2012 PFEIFFER PARTNERS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 32,757.74
134952 10/05/2012 PH&S PRODUCTS, LLC Accounts Payable Check 336.00
134953 10/05/2012 KEN PHILLIPS Accounts Payable Check 243.09
134954 10/05/2012 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY,INC. Accounts Payable Check 804.14
134955 10/05/2012 PROGRESSIVE SOLUTIONS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 349.00
134956 10/05/2012 RAIN FOR RENT BAKERSFIELD Accounts Payable Check 905.50
134957 10/05/2012 RACHELLE RICKARD Accounts Payable Check 300.00
134958 10/05/2012 ROB DAVIS BACKHOE Accounts Payable Check 1,800.00
134959 10/05/2012 MICHELLE R. ROGERS Accounts Payable Check 714.00
134960 10/05/2012 S.W. MARTIN &ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 11,932.50
134961 10/05/2012 SAN DIEGO REG TRAINING CTR Accounts Payable Check 425.00
134962 10/05/2012 SAN LUIS POWERHOUSE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 519.64
134963 10/05/2012 SCOTT SATTERTHWAITE Accounts Payable Check 294.15
134964 10/05/2012 SCHIMM'S TREE SERVICE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 150.00
134965 10/05/2012 LAURA SCHMIDT Accounts Payable Check 15.00
134966 10/05/2012 JOHN C. SIEMENS Accounts Payable Check 525.00
134967 10/05/2012 WILLIAM F. SIMA, MD, INC. Accounts Payable Check 300.00
134968 10/05/2012 SLO COUNTY SHERIFF Accounts Payable Check 129.00
134969 10/05/2012 SLO COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR Accounts Payable Check 106.60
134970 10/05/2012 SLO COUNTY VISITOR Accounts Payable Check 1,250.00
134971 10/05/2012 SMARTAND FINAL Accounts Payable Check 49.00
134972 10/05/2012 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY Accounts Payable Check 155.82
134973 10/05/2012 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO COMM. Accounts Payable Check 31,133.00
134974 10/05/2012 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1,668.50
134975 10/05/2012 SUPERIOR CRANE&TRANSPORT Accounts Payable Check 528.00
134976 10/05/2012 TAFT ELECTRIC COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 25,381.71
134977 10/05/2012 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS Accounts Payable Check 177.73
134978 10/05/2012 RUSS THOMPSON Accounts Payable Check 300.00
134979 10/05/2012 MARCIATORGERSON Accounts Payable Check 78.83
134980 10/05/2012 UNITED STAFFING ASSOCIATES,LLC Accounts Payable Check 1,584.00
134981 10/05/2012 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check 2,457.36
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of October 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
134982 10/05/2012 IWINA M. VAN BEEK Accounts Payable Check 171.00
134983 10/05/2012 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 1,235.13
134984 10/05/2012 TOM WAY Accounts Payable Check 543.40
134985 10/05/2012 JENNIFER L.WEAVER Accounts Payable Check 36.00
134986 10/05/2012 WELL SEEN SIGN CO., LLC Accounts Payable Check 241.31
134987 10/05/2012 WINE COUNTRY CARPET CARE Accounts Payable Check 200.00
134988 10/05/2012 KAREN B.WYKE Accounts Payable Check 373.65
1181 10/12/2012 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Payroll Vendor Payment 874.61
1182 10/12/2012 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTER Payroll Vendor Payment 43,096.17
1183 10/12/2012 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEP Accounts Payable Check 59,265.25
134989 10/12/2012 ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE.ASSN, Payroll Vendor Payment 760.00
134990 10/12/2012 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 40.00
134991 10/12/2012 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS Payroll Vendor Payment 1,259.50
134992 10/12/2012 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC. Payroll Vendor Payment 2,706.87
134993 10/12/2012 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Payroll Vendor Payment 200.00
134994 10/12/2012 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 28,930.96
134995 10/12/2012 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment 732.07
134996 10/12/2012 SEIU LOCAL 620 Payroll Vendor Payment 748.07
134997 10/12/2012 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 Payroll Vendor Payment 311.61
134998 10/12/2012 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 Payroll Vendor Payment 2,506.20
134999 10/12/2012 CHEVRON&TEXACO BUS. CARD Accounts Payable Check 1,103.70
135000 10/12/2012 JENNIFER FANNING Accounts Payable Check 194.00
135003 10/12/2012 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 47,698.91
135004 10/12/2012 SHELL Accounts Payable Check 829.88
135005 10/12/2012 WRIGHT EXPRESS FSC-76 UNIVERSL Accounts Payable Check 13,828.92
1184 10/16/2012 RABOBANK, N.A. Payroll Vendor Payment 56,564.96
1185 10/16/2012 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 15,556.76
1186 10/16/2012 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1,180.01
135006 10/19/2012 DAVID ANASTASIA Accounts Payable Check 406.20
135007 10/22/2012 A&R CONSTRUCTION Accounts Payable Check 1,775.00
135008 10/22/2012 MATTHEW R.AANERUD Accounts Payable Check 1,200.00
135009 10/22/2012 ACCESS PUBLISHING Accounts Payable Check 828.00
135010 10/22/2012 AGP VIDEO, INC. Accounts Payable Check 2,575.00
135011 10/22/2012 AIRGAS USA, LLC Accounts Payable Check 3.00
135012 10/22/2012 AIR-RITE REFRIGERATION Accounts Payable Check 556.76
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of October 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
135013 10/22/2012 ALL SIGNS AND GRAPHICS, LLC Accounts Payable Check 101.89
135014 10/22/2012 AMERICAN MARBORG Accounts Payable Check 267.20
135015 10/22/2012 AMERICAN WEST TIRE&AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 4,505.05
135016 10/22/2012 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS Accounts Payable Check 36.40
135017 10/22/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 144.99
135018 10/22/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 188.77
135019 10/22/2012 ATASCADERO HAY& FEED Accounts Payable Check 435.97
135021 10/22/2012 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 26,986.70
135022 10/22/2012 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 120.00
135023 10/22/2012 BARRY-OWEN CO., INC. Accounts Payable Check 106.53
135024 10/22/2012 BASSETT'S CRICKET RANCH,INC. Accounts Payable Check 122.76
135025 10/22/2012 BERNARDS Accounts Payable Check 110,831.70
135026 10/22/2012 BERRY MAN, INC. Accounts Payable Check 917.25
135027 10/22/2012 BMI Accounts Payable Check 320.00
135028 10/22/2012 BRADS OVERHEAD DOORS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 135.00
135029 10/22/2012 BURKE,WILLIAMS, &SORENSON LLP Accounts Payable Check 23,985.29
135030 10/22/2012 C3 CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT Accounts Payable Check 7,940.80
135031 10/22/2012 CA CODE CHECK, INC. Accounts Payable Check 7,812.83
135032 10/22/2012 CA PARKS & RECREATION Accounts Payable Check 150.00
135033 10/22/2012 CAL-COAST INSIGNIA Accounts Payable Check 173.62
135034 10/22/2012 CALPORTLAND COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 319.79
135035 10/22/2012 JASON F. CARR Accounts Payable Check 179.00
135036 10/22/2012 CCC-ICC Accounts Payable Check 90.00
135037 10/22/2012 CED CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL Accounts Payable Check 14.61
135038 10/22/2012 CENTRAL COAST SEAFOOD Accounts Payable Check 619.10
135039 10/22/2012 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 20.00
135040 10/22/2012 COAST ELECTRONICS Accounts Payable Check 64,35
135041 10/22/2012 COAST LINE DISTRIBUTING Accounts Payable Check 252.65
135042 10/22/2012 COASTAL COPY, LP Accounts Payable Check 190.31
135043 10/22/2012 CORELOGIC INF. SOLUTIONS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 100.00
135044 10/22/2012 CREDIT BUREAU Accounts Payable Check 40.00
135045 10/22/2012 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 65.40
135046 10/22/2012 DALZELL ENTERPRISES Accounts Payable Check 192.00
135047 10/22/2012 DARRYL'S LOCK AND SAFE Accounts Payable Check 713.41
135048 10/22/2012 BRIAN S. DAVIN, JR. Accounts Payable Check 216.00
135049 10/22/2012 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY& FIRE Accounts Payable Check 1,581.72
135050 10/22/2012 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Accounts Payable Check 1,449.00
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listinq
For the Month of October 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
135051 10/22/2012 DIANI BUILDING CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 378,513.90
135052 10/22/2012 DISH NETWORK, LLC Accounts Payable Check 91.99
135053 10/22/2012 DOCUTEAM Accounts Payable Check 331.20
135054 10/22/2012 JACK DORRIS Accounts Payable Check 20.00
135055 10/22/2012 DRIVE CUSTOMS Accounts Payable Check 800.00
135056 10/22/2012 DANIEL R. DUCLOS Accounts Payable Check 54.00
135057 10/22/2012 EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC Accounts Payable Check 13,852.50
135058 10/22/2012 ED'S FLY MEAT, LLC Accounts Payable Check 101.50
135059 10/22/2012 EL CAMINO CAR WASH LLC Accounts Payable Check 17.95
135060 10/22/2012 EL CAMINO VETERINARY HOSP Accounts Payable Check 184.92
135061 10/22/2012 ESCUELA DEL RIO Accounts Payable Check 160.00
135062 10/22/2012 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 16.29
135063 10/22/2012 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 1,354.72
135064 10/22/2012 AMANDA FERRIE Accounts Payable Check 50.00
135065 10/22/2012 ROBERTA FONZI Accounts Payable Check 38.86
135066 10/22/2012 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 138.19
135067 10/22/2012 FRAZEE INDUSTRIES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 41.23
135068 10/22/2012 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 33.93
135069 10/22/2012 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 663.75
135070 10/22/2012 GILBERT'S LANDSCAPES Accounts Payable Check 407.91
135071 10/22/2012 GSA-INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Accounts Payable Check 751.89
135072 10/22/2012 JEREL HALEY Accounts Payable Check 150.83
135073 10/22/2012 ROCHELLE 0. HANSON Accounts Payable Check 179.00
135074 10/22/2012 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT& COPY Accounts Payable Check 145.21
135075 10/22/2012 HOBBY BODY& PAINT SHOP Accounts Payable Check 690.00
135076 10/22/2012 INGLIS PET HOTEL Accounts Payable Check 353.85
135077 10/22/2012 INHOUSE SECURITY SERVICE, LLC Accounts Payable Check 661.38
135078 10/22/2012 INTERNATIONAL E-Z UP, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,820,87
135079 10/22/2012 INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF Accounts Payable Check 185.00
135080 10/22/2012 INTOXIMETERS Accounts Payable Check 256.90
135081 10/22/2012 IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MGMNT Accounts Payable Check 35.72
135082 10/22/2012 MEGAN A. ISOLA Accounts Payable Check 208.60
135083 10/22/2012 CAROL D. JANSSEN Accounts Payable Check 828.00
135084 10/22/2012 JIFFY LUBE Accounts Payable Check 34.62
135085 10/22/2012 JK'S UNLIMITED Accounts Payable Check 10,445.93
135086 10/22/2012 RUSS R. JOHNSON Accounts Payable Check 200.00
135087 10/22/2012 KARP LAND SURVEYS Accounts Payable Check 747.50
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of October 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
135088 10/22/2012 LANDSCAPES BY STACH Accounts Payable Check 250.00
135089 10/22/2012 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO. INC Accounts Payable Check 1,538.00
135090 10/22/2012 JAMES R. LEWIS Accounts Payable Check 22.00
135091 10/22/2012 MANUEL MADRIGAL Accounts Payable Check 191.84
135092 10/22/2012 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00
135093 10/22/2012 MICHAEL FREDERICK PAVING,INC. Accounts Payable Check 9,079.52
135094 10/22/2012 MICHAEL K. NUNLEY&ASSC, INC. Accounts Payable Check 4,020.00
135095 10/22/2012 MID-COAST GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 190.00
135096 10/22/2012 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW, INC. Accounts Payable Check 37.43
135097 10/22/2012 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 496.02
135098 10/22/2012 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 220.74
135099 10/22/2012 REON C MONSON Accounts Payable Check 75.00
135100 10/22/2012 MOSS, LEVY, & HARTZHEIM LLP Accounts Payable Check 5,000.00
135101 10/22/2012 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY CO. Accounts Payable Check 56.31
135102 10/22/2012 NATLALLIANCE FOR YOUTH SPORTS Accounts Payable Check 69.00
135103 10/22/2012 NBS Accounts Payable Check 5,835.02
135104 10/22/2012 KELLYE R. NETZ Accounts Payable Check 179.00
135105 10/22/2012 NORTHERN ENERGY Accounts Payable Check 48.43
135106 10/22/2012 OFFICE DEPOT INC. Accounts Payable Check 480.75
135107 10/22/2012 PERRY'S PARCEL&COURIER SVC Accounts Payable Check 14.46
135108 10/22/2012 VICTORIA POWELL Accounts Payable Check 144.97
135109 10/22/2012 PRO TOW Accounts Payable Check 65.00
135110 10/22/2012 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY,INC. Accounts Payable Check 297.44
135111 10/22/2012 PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT Accounts Payable Check 3,381.48
135112 10/22/2012 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 48.26
135113 10/22/2012 ERIN RUSSELL Accounts Payable Check 1,192.54
135114 10/22/2012 MARK J. RUSSO Accounts Payable Check 145.00
135115 10/22/2012 S.W. MARTIN &ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 94.33
135116 10/22/2012 SAFETY DRIVERS ED., LLC. Accounts Payable Check 34.30
135117 10/22/2012 SAN LUIS POWERHOUSE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 135.00
135118 10/22/2012 SLO CO FIRE Accounts Payable Check 300.00
135119 10/22/2012 SLO CO FIRE Accounts Payable Check 90.00
135120 10/22/2012 SLO CO HEALTH AGENCY Accounts Payable Check 938.00
135121 10/22/2012 SLO COUNTY HEALTH AGENCY Accounts Payable Check 62,218.50
135122 10/22/2012 SPECIALTY GEAR &TRANSMISSION Accounts Payable Check 160.00
135123 10/22/2012 BRIAN STURTEVANT Accounts Payable Check 33.46
135124 10/22/2012 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1,085.00
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of October 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
135125 10/22/2012 TAFT ELECTRIC COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 19,007.77
135126 10/22/2012 RONALD R. TARICA Accounts Payable Check 270.00
135127 10/22/2012 THE KIPLINGER TAX LETTER Accounts Payable Check 59.00
135128 10/22/2012 LESLIE R. THOMPSON Accounts Payable Check 58.80
135129 10/22/2012 MARCIATORGERSON Accounts Payable Check 34.43
135130 10/22/2012 TRIBUNE Accounts Payable Check 372.00
135136 10/22/2012 U.S. BANK Accounts Payable Check 35,849.95
135137 10/22/2012 ULTREX BUSINESS PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 290.41
135138 10/22/2012 UNITED STAFFING ASSOCIATES,LLC Accounts Payable Check 1,801.80
135139 10/22/2012 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check 1,424.18
135140 10/22/2012 IWINA M.VAN BEEK Accounts Payable Check 95.00
135141 10/22/2012 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 643.22
135142 10/22/2012 WELL SEEN SIGN CO., LLC Accounts Payable Check 198.20
135143 10/22/2012 BRIAN WESTERMAN Accounts Payable Check 1,603.82
135144 10/22/2012 WILLIAM P. WHITE Accounts Payable Check 1,848.16
135145 10/22/2012 WONDRIES FLEET GROUP Accounts Payable Check 55,598.90
135146 10/22/2012 WYSONG CONSTRUCTION CO. Accounts Payable Check 64,966.50
135147 10/22/2012 ZOO MED LABORATORIES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 86.23
1187 10/26/2012 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Payroll Vendor Payment 874.61
135148 10/26/2012 ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN. Payroll Vendor Payment 760.00
135149 10/26/2012 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 40.00
135150 10/26/2012 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS Payroll Vendor Payment 1,259.50
135151 14/26/2012 AXA EQUITABLE Payroll Vendor Payment 520.12
135152 10/26/2012 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT Accounts Payable Check 2,250.00
135153 10/26/2012 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC. Payroll Vendor Payment 2,706.87
135154 10/26/2012 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC. Payroll Vendor Payment 165.00
135155 10/26/2012 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Payroll Vendor Payment 200.00
135156 10/26/2012 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 9,230.96
135157 10/26/2012 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment 812.30
135158 10/26/2012 SEIU LOCAL 620 Payroll Vendor Payment 748.99
135159 10/26/2012 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 Payroll Vendor Payment 311.61
135160 10/26/2012 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 Payroll Vendor Payment 2,506.20
1188 10/29/2012 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 42,256.08
1189 10/29/2012 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEP Accounts Payable Check 59,029.77
1190 10/30/2012 RABOBANK, N.A. Payroll Vendor Payment 41,315.25
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of October 2012
Check Check
Number pate Vendor Description Amount
1191 10/30/2012 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 10,055.34
1192 10/30/2012 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1,096.69
$ 3,042,196.06
ITEM NUMBER: A - 6
DATE: 01/08/13
tsdr City ®unci)
Staff Report - Administrative Services Department
November 2012 Accounts Payable and Payroll
RECOMMENDATION:
Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for
November 2012.
DISCUSSION:
Attached for City Council review and approval are the following:
Payroll
Dated 11/8/12 Checks # 29995 - 30017 $ 14,414,43
Direct Deposits 244,179.79
Dated 11/21/12 Checks # 30018 - 30038 13,228.36
Direct Deposits 247,735.51
Accounts Payable
Dated 11/1/12 - 11/30/12
Checks # 135161 - 135551
& EFTs 1193 - 1205 6,157,614.55
TOTAL AMOUNT $ 6,677,172.64
FISCAL IMPACT:
Total expenditures for all funds is $ 6,677,172.64
CERTIFICATION:
The undersigned certifies that the attached demands have been released for payent
and that funds are available for these demandil':
Rache le Rickard, Director of Administrative Services
ATTACHMENT:
November 2012 Eden Warrant Register in the amount of $ 6,157,614.55
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of November 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
135161 11/03/2012 A&TARBORISTS&VEGETATION Accounts Payable Check 450.00
135162 11/03/2012 KEITH AGGSON Accounts Payable Check 206.00
135163 11/03/2012 AIRGAS USA, LLC Accounts Payable Check 38.53
135164 11/03/2012 ALL SIGNS AND GRAPHICS, LLC Accounts Payable Check 775.26
135165 11/03/2012 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC Accounts Payable Check 143.22
135166 11/03/2012 AL'S SEPTIC PUMPING SVC, INC. Accounts Payable Check 760.00
135167 11/03/2012 ALTHOUSE&MEADE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,068.48
135168 11/03/2012 AMERICAN WEST TIRE&AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 1,820,20
135169 11/03/2012 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS Accounts Payable Check 199.30
135170 11/03/2012 ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION Accounts Payable Check 15.00
135171 11/03/2012 DAVIDARNESON Accounts Payable Check 2,230.00
135175 11/03/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 1,599.65
135176 11/03/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 984.35
135177 11/03/2012 ATASCADERO HAY& FEED Accounts Payable Check 56.82
135179 11/03/2012 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 19,913.45
135180 11/03/2012 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 3,790.00
135181 11/03/2012 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 247.20
135182 11/03/2012 ATASCADERO TRAFFIC WAY STORAGE Accounts Payable Check 660.00
135183 11/03/2012 AURORA WORLD, INC. Accounts Payable Check 322,27
135184 11/03/2012 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON Accounts Payable Check 1,750.00
135185 11/03/2012 BASSETT'S CRICKET RANCH,INC. Accounts Payable Check 203.49
135186 11/03/2012 BERNARDS Accounts Payable Check 80,412.20
135187 11/03/2012 BERRY MAN, INC. Accounts Payable Check 763.05
135188 11/03/2012 CLEMENS BOCK Accounts Payable Check 7,500.00
135189 11/03/2012 NICHOLAS P. BOONISAR Accounts Payable Check 90.00
135190 11/03/2012 DENNIS BRADSHAW Accounts Payable Check 3,600.00
135191 11/03/2012 CASEY BRYSON Accounts Payable Check 206.00
135192 11/03/2012 CA CODE CHECK, INC. Accounts Payable Check 12,187.05
135193 11/03/2012 CALPORTLAND CONSTRUCTION Accounts Payable Check 20,691.98
135194 11/03/2012 LISA CAVA Accounts Payable Check 389.05
135196 11/03/2012 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS Accounts Payable Check 1,953.31
135197 11/03/2012 BRADY CHERRY Accounts Payable Check 300.00
135198 11/03/2012 KAREN A. CLANIN Accounts Payable Check 49.00
135199 11/03/2012 COAST LINE DISTRIBUTING Accounts Payable Check 149.50
135200 11/03/2012 COLBY JACK CAFE & BAKERY, INC. Accounts Payable Check 400.24
135201 11/03/2012 COLONY AUTO SERVICE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 110.24
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of November 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
135202 11/03/2012 JERI CORGILL Accounts Payable Check 698.44
135203 11/03/2012 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 84.80
135204 11/03/2012 CWEA Accounts Payable Check 140.00
135205 11/03/2012 THE DAVEY TREE EXPERT COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 380.00
135206 11/03/2012 BRIAN S. DAVIN, JR. Accounts Payable Check 270.00
135207 11/03/2012 DANIELA. DAVIS Accounts Payable Check 318.50
135208 11/03/2012 EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC Accounts Payable Check 10,419.00
135209 11/03/2012 ECS IMAGING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 6,515.69
135210 11/03/2012 EDA DESIGN PROFESSIONALS Accounts Payable Check 720.00
135211 11/03/2012 ED'S FLY MEAT, LLC Accounts Payable Check 100.90
135212 11/03/2012 EIKHOF DESIGN GROUP, INC. Accounts Payable Check 12,875.00
135213 11/03/2012 EWING IRRIGATION GOLF INDUSTRL Accounts Payable Check 159.59
135214 11/03/2012 JENNIFER FANNING Accounts Payable Check 4.50
135215 11/03/2012 FARWEST LINE SPECIALTIES Accounts Payable Check 2,898.97
135216 11/03/2012 FENCE FACTORYATASCADERO Accounts Payable Check 600.66
135217 11/03/2012 FERRAVANTI GRADING& PAVING Accounts Payable Check 31,333.25
135218 11/03/2012 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL Accounts Payable Check 543.00
135219 11/03/2012 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE Accounts Payable Check 18,512.00
135220 11/03/2012 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE Accounts Payable Check 4,612.00
135221 11/03/2012 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE Accounts Payable Check 2,622.00
135222 11/03/2012 FIRST TRANSIT, INC. Accounts Payable Check 18,187.49
135223 11/03/2012 KEN FORMAN Accounts Payable Check 10.00
135224 11/03/2012 WARREN FRACE Accounts Payable Check 300.00
135225 11/03/2012 GALLS, LLC Accounts Payable Check 42.77
135226 11/03/2012 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 596.30
135227 11/03/2012 STEPHANIE GEE Accounts Payable Check 75.00
135228 11/03/2012 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 205.36
135229 11/03/2012 GREEN TRADING USA Accounts Payable Check 140.51
135230 11/03/2012 BRADLEY A. HACKLEMAN Accounts Payable Check 762.15
135231 11/03/2012 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 81.24
135232 11/03/2012 HARVEY'S HONEYHUTS Accounts Payable Check 859,58
135233 11/03/2012 ZACHARIAH JACKSON Accounts Payable Check 206.00
135234 11/03/2012 CAROL D. JANSSEN Accounts Payable Check 436.20
135235 11/03/2012 JIFFY LUBE Accounts Payable Check 50.15
135236 11/03/2012 JK'S UNLIMITED Accounts Payable Check 1,958.45
135237 11/03/2012 JOE A. GONSALVES& SON Accounts Payable Check 3,000.00
135238 11/03/2012 K&M INTERNATIONAL Accounts Payable Check 346.25
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of November 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
135239 11/03/2012 KARP LAND SURVEYS Accounts Payable Check 4,358.50
135240 11/03/2012 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER Accounts Payable Check 1,302.00
135241 11/03/2012 BRIAN KIRKER Accounts Payable Check 75.00
135242 11/03/2012 KPRL 1230 AM Accounts Payable Check 320.00
135243 11/03/2012 JAMES R. LEWIS Accounts.Payable Check 250.00
135244 11/03/2012 MADRONE LANDSCAPES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 200.00
135245 11/03/2012 MAINLINE UTILITY CO. Accounts Payable Check 525.00
135246 11/03/2012 BECKY MAXWELL Accounts Payable Check 67.93
135247 11/03/2012 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 897.03
135248 11/03/2012 MID-COAST GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 6,080.00
135249 11/03/2012 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW, INC. Accounts Payable Check 15.00
135250 11/03/2012 MID-STATE SOLID WASTE & RECYCG Accounts Payable Check 624.32
135251 11/03/2012 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 171.20
135252 11/03/2012 MATTHEW J. MIRANDA Accounts Payable Check 206.00
135253 11/03/2012 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 194.72
135254 11/03/2012 REON C MONSON Accounts Payable Check 225.00
135255 11/03/2012 MOSS, LEVY, & HARTZHEIM LLP Accounts Payable Check 2,500.00
135256 11/03/2012 DAVE MUEHLHAUSEN Accounts Payable Check 78.00
135257 11/03/2012 OFFICE DEPOT INC. Accounts Payable Check 719.10
135258 11/03/2012 PACIFIC COAST GYMNASTICS CENTE Accounts Payable Check 401.80
135259 11/03/2012 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 1,000.00
135260 11/03/2012 PERFORMANCE SWEEPING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 480.00
135261 11/03/2012 PFEIFFER PARTNERS, INC, Accounts Payable Check 42,183.79
135262 11/03/2012 PG&E CFM/PPC DEPARTMENT Accounts Payable Check 53,196.14
135263 11/03/2012 PICKARD& BUTTERS CONST., INC. Accounts Payable Check 147,203.44
135264 11/03/2012 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY,INC. Accounts Payable Check 813.50
135265 11/03/2012 PATRICIA RABOLINI Accounts Payable Check 100.00
135266 11/03/2012 JERI RANGEL Accounts Payable Check 15.00
135267 11/03/2012 RHODE ISLAND NOVELTY Accounts Payable Check 215.07
135268 11/03/2012 RACHELLE RICKARD Accounts Payable Check 336.00
135269 11/03/2012 CHRISTOPHER R. ROBINSON Accounts Payable Check 206.00
135270 11/03/2012 JOHN C. SIEMENS Accounts Payable Check 448.00
135271 11/03/2012 SLO CO HEALTH AGENCY Accounts Payable Check 1,383.00
135272 11/03/2012 SLO COUNTY SHERIFF Accounts Payable Check 43.00
135273 11/03/2012 RICHARD A. SMITH Accounts Payable Check 54.00
135274 11/03/2012 RYAN SMITH Accounts Payable Check 145.00
135275 11/03/2012 STATE WATER RES CONTROL BOARD Accounts Payable Check 195.00
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of November 2012
Check Check
Number Hate Vendor Description Amount
135276 11/03/2012 KURT W. STONE Accounts Payable Check 113.00
135277 11/03/2012 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO COMM. Accounts Payable Check 31,133.00
135278 11/03/2012 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1,695.00
135279 11/03/2012 TACTICAL COMMAND INDUSTRIES Accounts Payable Check 4,118.40
135280 11/03/2012 RUSS THOMPSON Accounts Payable Check 300.00
135281 11/03/2012 TOSTE CONSTRUCTION, INC. Accounts Payable Check 41,851.28
135282 11/03/2012 TW TELECOM, INC. Accounts Payable Check 36.08
135283 11/03/2012 UNION BANK, N.A. Accounts Payable Check 2,807.00
135284 11/03/2012 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check 4,189.02
135285 11/03/2012 IWINA M. VAN BEEK Accounts Payable Check 114.00
135286 11/03/2012 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 2,496.26
135287 11/03/2012 WALLACE GROUP Accounts Payable Check 7,949.75
135288 11/03/2012 BRIAN WESTERMAN Accounts Payable Check 605.85
135289 11/03/2012 WILLIAM P. WHITE Accounts Payable Check 206.00
1193 11/08/2012 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Payroll Vendor Payment 874.61
1194 11/08/2012 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEP Payroll Vendor Payment 42,231.20
135290 11/08/2012 ALLSTATE WORKPLACE DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 3,506.64
135291 11/08/2012 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS CO Payroll Vendor Payment 878.11
135292 11/08/2012 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES Payroll Vendor Payment 1,629.37
135293 11/08/2012 PREFERRED BENEFITS INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 9,538.10
135294 11/08/2012 SDRMA Payroll Vendor Payment 145,445.28
1195 11/09/2012 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTED Payroll Vendor Payment 59,297.15
135295 11/09/2012 ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN. Payroll Vendor Payment 760.00
135296 11/09/2012 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 40.00
135297 11/09/2012 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS Payroll Vendor Payment 1,259.50
135298 11/09/2012 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC. Payroll Vendor Payment 2,706.87
135299 11/09/2012 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Payroll Vendor Payment 200.00
135300 11/09/2012 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 9,230.96
135301 11/09/2012 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment 644.21
135302 11/09/2012 SEIU LOCAL 620 Payroll Vendor Payment 748.99
135303 11/09/2012 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 Payroll Vendor Payment 311.61
135304 11/09/2012 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 Payroll Vendor Payment 2,506.20
1196 11/13/2012 RABOBANK, N.A. Payroll Vendor Payment 43,897.26
1197 11/13/2012 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 11,001.22
1198 11/13/2012 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1,061.52
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of November 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
135305 11/15/2012 CHEVRON&TEXACO BUS. CARD Accounts Payable Check 1,352.30
135306 11/15/2012 SHELL Accounts Payable Check 1,044.12
135307 11115/2012 SLO COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Accounts Payable.Check 3,959,869.19
135308 11/15/2012 WEX BANK- 76 UNIVERSL Accounts Payable Check 14,500.74
135309 11/19/2012 ACCESS PUBLISHING Accounts Payable Check 75.00
135310 11/19/2012 ADAPTIVE DRIVING SYSTEMS, INC Accounts Payable Check 100.00
135311 11/19/2012 ADVANCED SEPTIC&SEWER SVC Accounts Payable Check 375.00
135312 11/19/2012 KEITH AGGSON Accounts Payable Check 577.79
135313 11/19/2012 AGP VIDEO, INC, Accounts Payable Check 3,027.50
135314 11/19/2012 A-JAY EXCAVATING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,914.00
135315 11/19/2012 AL'S SEPTIC PUMPING SVC, INC. Accounts Payable Check 2,645.00
135316 11/19/2012 AMERICAN WEST TIRE&AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 2,862.84
135317 11/19/2012 AMI PIPE&SUPPLY, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,265.02
135318 11/19/2012 A-MOBIL Accounts Payable Check 205.00
135319 11/19/2012 KELLYAREBALO Accounts Payable Check 395.90
135320 11/19/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 136.50
135321 11/19/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 242.55
135322 11/19/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 79.52
135323 11/19/2012 ATASCADERO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Accounts Payable Check 105.84
135324 11/19/2012 ATASCADERO HAY& FEED Accounts Payable Check 383.24
135325 11/19/2012 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 500.00
135326 11/19/2012 BATTERY SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 2,141.13
135327 11/19/2012 SHIRLEY R. BRUTON Accounts Payable Check 151.50
135328 11/19/2012 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,447.88
135329 11/19/2012 CA CODE CHECK, INC, Accounts Payable Check 4,077.50
135330 11/19/2012 CALPORTLAND COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 281.30
135331 11/19/2012 JASON F. CARR Accounts Payable Check 179.00
135332 11/19/2012 JOSEPH M. CARRO Accounts Payable Check 378.00
135333 11/19/2012 CED CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL Accounts Payable Check 988.87
135334 11/19/2012 CENTRAL COAST HEALTHCARE,APMC Accounts Payable Check 180.00
135335 11/19/2012 KATHLEEN J.CINOWALT Accounts Payable Check 259.00
135336 11/19/2012 CO OF SAN LUIS OBISPO SART PRG Accounts Payable Check 1,383.00
135337 11/19/2012 COASTAL COPY, LP Accounts Payable Check 139.91
135338 11/19/2012 COASTAL REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 107.68
135339 11/19/2012 CORELOGIC INF, SOLUTIONS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 100.00
135340 11/19/2012 COUNTY CLERK RECORDER Accounts Payable Check 62.00
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of November 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
135341 11/19/2012 CREDIT BUREAU Accounts Payable Check 40.00
135342 11/19/2012 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 917.39
135343 11/19/2012 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 100.25
135344 11/19/2012 CT INTERNATIONAL Accounts Payable Check 141.57
135345 11/19/2012 CULLIGAN/CENTRAL COAST WTR TRT Accounts Payable Check 70.00
135346 11/19/2012 MATTHEW J. CURRY Accounts Payable Check 165.00
135347 11/19/2012 D4 ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 150.00
135348 11/19/2012 BRIAN S. DAVIN,JR. Accounts Payable Check 234.00
135349 11/19/2012 DIAMONDBACK FIRE& RESCUE, INC Accounts Payable Check 322.96
135350 11/19/2012 DIANI BUILDING CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 506,829.57
135351 11/19/2012 DISH NETWORK, LLC Accounts Payable Check 98.99
135352 11/19/2012 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY CORP. Accounts Payable Check 1,450.75
135353 11/19/2012 DOCUTEAM Accounts Payable Check 127.99
135354 11/19/2012 DRIVE CUSTOMS Accounts Payable Check 4,175.76
135355 11/19/2012 ECONOMIC VITALITY CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 5,000.00
135356 11/19/2012 KERRIN M, EDMONDS Accounts Payable Check 9.00
135357 11/19/2012 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SPEC., INC. Accounts Payable Check 20.00
135358 11/19/2012 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 245.39
135359 11/19/2012 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 199.50
135360 11/19/2012 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL Accounts Payable Check 437.00
135361 11/19/2012 FLUID RESOURCE MANAGEMENT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 3,030.30
135362 11/19/2012 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 105,94
135363 11/19/2012 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 571.23
135364 11/19/2012 GOLDING CONCRETE SAWING Accounts Payable Check 200.00
135365 11/19/2012 BARRY HARDY Accounts Payable Check 39.68
135366 11/19/2012 EDDIE L. HARRIS Accounts Payable Check 38.00
135367 11/19/2012 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT& COPY Accounts Payable Check 394.32
135368 11/19/2012 EVELYN R. INGRAM Accounts Payable Check 896.06
135369 11/19/2012 J. CARROLL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 1,018.81
135370 11/19/2012 CAROL D. JANSSEN Accounts Payable Check 331.20
135371 11/19/2012 JK'S UNLIMITED Accounts Payable Check 6,000.18
135372 11/19/2012 KPRL 1230 AM Accounts Payable Check 320.00
135373 11/19/2012 L.N. CURTIS& SONS Accounts Payable Check 1,185,12
135374 11/19/2012 LANDSCAPES BY STACH Accounts Payable Check 250.00
135375 11/19/2012 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO. INC Accounts Payable Check 305.00
135376 11/19/2012 MADRONE LANDSCAPES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 17,302.65
135377 11/19/2012 MAINLINE UTILITY CO. Accounts Payable Check 450.00
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of November 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
135378 11/19/2012 DAN MCGAULEY Accounts Payable Check 200.00
135379 11/19/2012 MID-COAST GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 3,133.00
135380 11/19/2012 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW, INC. Accounts Payable Check 402.36
135381 11/19/2012 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 589.45
135382 11/19/2012 MISSION COMMUNITY BANK Accounts Payable Check 5,090.39
135383 11/19/2012 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 618.04
135384 11/19/2012 SHERI MOEN Accounts Payable Check 60.00
135385 11/19/2012 REON C MONSON Accounts Payable Check 102.00
135386 11/19/2012 MICHALS. MOSES Accounts Payable Check 2,038.80
135387 11/19/2012 MOTION PICTURE LICENSING CORP. Accounts Payable Check 558.21
135388 11/19/2012 MPI Accounts Payable Check 84.31
135389 11/19/2012 JOEL MUELLER Accounts Payable Check 60.00
135390 11/19/2012 NEUTRAL POSTURE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,801.80
135391 11/19/2012 O.C.TANNER Accounts Payable Check 2,063.68
135392 11/19/2012 OFFICE DEPOT INC. Accounts Payable Check 257.61
135393 11/19/2012 O'REILLYAUTOMOTIVE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 99.53
135396 11/19/2012 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 43,932.72
135397 11/19/2012 PASO ROBLES SAFE & LOCK, INC. Accounts Payable Check 213.37
135398 11/19/2012 DEAN PERICIC Accounts Payable Check 11.75
135399 11/19/2012 PERRY'S PARCEL&COURIER SVC Accounts Payable Check 29.34
135400 11/19/2012 PH&S PRODUCTS, LLC Accounts Payable Check 294.00
135401 11/19/2012 DUANE POWELL Accounts Payable Check 244.16
135402 11/19/2012 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLYJNC. Accounts Payable Check 522.27
135403 11/19/2012 PROVANTAGE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 12,915.00
135404 11/19/2012 RADIO SHACK CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 6.96
135405 11/19/2012 RAMINHA CONSTRUCTION, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,266.00
135406 11/19/2612 ROCKWOOD GENERAL CONTRACTORS Accounts Payable Check 85,714.41
135407 11/19/2012 MICHELLE R. ROGERS Accounts Payable Check 406.00
135408 11/19/2012 SAFETY DRIVERS ED., LLC. Accounts Payable Check 34.30
135409 11/19/2012 SAN LUIS POWERHOUSE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,599.18
135410 11/19/2012 SANTA BARBARA SEASONS Accounts Payable Check 3,450.00
135411 11/19/2012 SANTA MARGARITA CONST, CORP. Accounts Payable Check 45,813.46
135412 11/19/2012 SCHIMM'S TREE SERVICE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 250.00
135413 11/19/2012 ROBYN C. SCHMIDT Accounts Payable Check 462.00
135414 11/19/2012 SCMAF Accounts Payable Check 20.00
135415 11/19/2012 SCOTT DAVIS CONSULTING Accounts Payable Check 1,612.50
135416 11/19/2012 SCOTT O'BRIEN FIRE& SAFETY CO Accounts Payable Check 308.32
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listinq
For the Month of November 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description. Amount
135417 11/19/2012 SETINA MFG CO., INC. Accounts Payable Check 574.62
135418 11/19/2012 SLO CO FIRE Accounts Payable Check 340.00
135419 11/19/2012 SLO COUNTY LIBRARY Accounts Payable Check 20,430.00
135420 11/19/2012 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY Accounts Payable Check 49221
135421 11/19/2012 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN Accounts Payable Check 709.97
135422 11/19/2012 SUPERIOR CRANE&TRANSPORT Accounts Payable Check 528.00
135423 11/19/2012 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIERS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 400.00
135424 11/19/2012 SWRCB FEES Accounts Payable Check 12,131.00
135425 11/19/2012 TAFT ELECTRIC COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 41,910.84
135426 11/19/2012 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS Accounts Payable Check 33.49
135427 11/19/2012 TOOLS FOR BUSINESS SUCCESS Accounts Payable Check 1,140.00
135428 11/19/2012 THE TOP SHOP UPHOLSTERY Accounts Payable Check 225.80
135429 11/19/2012 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST, INC Accounts Payable Check 1,725.13
135430 11/19/2012 UNITED STAFFING ASSOCIATES,LLC Accounts Payable Check 1,584.00
135431 11/19/2012 UNIVAR USA, INC. Accounts Payable Check 5,408.41
135432 11/19/2012 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check 4,883.58
135433 11/19/2012 IWINA M.VAN BEEK Accounts Payable Check 533.00
135434 11/19/2012 VIBORG SAND&GRAVEL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 3,884.11
135435 11/19/2012 TOM WAY Accounts Payable Check 264.45
135436 11/19/2012 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 314.28
135437 11/19/2012 WHYTAL PACIFIC Accounts Payable Check 404.56
135438 11/19/2012 WULFING'S BACKGROUND& POLYGR Accounts Payable Check 250.00
135439 11/19/2012 KAREN B.WYKE Accounts Payable Check 369.00
135440 11/19/2012 BRIAN KIRKER Accounts Payable Check 55.00
1199 11/21/2012 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Payroll Vendor Payment 874.61
1200 11/26/2012 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEP Payroll Vendor Payment 42,113.94
1201 11/26/2012 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEA Payroll Vendor Payment 58,490.26
1202 11/26/2012 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEP Payroll Vendor Payment 261.28
135441 11/26/2012 ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN. Payroll Vendor Payment 760.00
135442 11/26/2012 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 40.00
135443 11/26/2012 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS Payroll Vendor Payment 1,259.50
135444 11/26/2012 AXA EQUITABLE Payroll Vendor Payment 520.12
135445 11/26/2012 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC. Payroll Vendor Payment 2,706.87
135446 11/26/2012 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC. Payroll Vendor Payment 165.00
135447 11/26/2012 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 9,230.96
135448 11/26/2012 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment 565.08
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of November 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
135449 11/26/2012 SEIU LOCAL 620 Payroll Vendor Payment 713.70
135450 11/26/2012 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 Payroll Vendor Payment 311.61
135451 11/26/2012 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 Payroll Vendor Payment 2,506.20
1203 11/27/2012 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 11,519.01
1204 11/27/2012 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1,071.72
1205 11/27/2012 RABOBANK, N.A. Payroll Vendor Payment 45,171.85
135452 11/28/2012 KURT LARMEE Accounts Payable Check 500.00
135455 11/28/2012 U.S. BANK Accounts Payable Check 19,816.13
135456 11/30/2012 ALLABOUT LEARNING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 240.00
135457 11/30/2012 ALL SIGNS AND GRAPHICS, LLC Accounts Payable Check 102.96
135458 11/30/2012 ALTHOUSE&MEADE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,420.50
135459 11/30/2012 AMERICAN MARBORG Accounts Payable Check 107.20
135460 11/30/2012 AMERICAN WEST TIRE&AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 287.94
135462 11/30/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 1,035.76
135463 11/30/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 636.18
135464 11/30/2012 ATASCADERO HAY&FEED Accounts Payable Check 387.49
135465 11/30/2012 ATD, INC. Accounts Payable Check 97.00
135466 11/30/2012 BASSETT'S CRICKET RANCH,INC. Accounts Payable Check 186.87
135467 11/30/2012 BERRY MAN, INC. Accounts Payable Check 885.65
135468 11/30/2012 BREZDEN PEST CONTROL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 160.00
135469 11/30/2012 RAY BUBAN Accounts Payable Check 49.00
135470 11/30/2012 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 99.13
135471 11/30/2012 BUTLER BUSINESS MACHINES Accounts Payable Check 351.78
135472 11/30/2012 CA CODE CHECK, INC. Accounts Payable Check 5,056.22
135473 11/30/2012 CA CONSERVATION CORP Accounts Payable Check 7,808.32
135474 11/30/2012 CED CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL Accounts Payable Check 492.28
135475 11/30/2012 CENTRAL COAST R& R LOCK Accounts Payable Check 161.12
135476 11/30/2012 CENTRAL COAST SEAFOOD Accounts Payable Check 181.50
135477 11/30/2012 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS Accounts Payable Check 982.98
135478 11/30/2012 CO OF SAN LUIS OBISPO SART PRG Accounts Payable Check 1,383.00
135479 11/30/2012 COAST ELECTRONICS Accounts Payable Check 702.00
135480 11/30/2012 COAST LINE DISTRIBUTING Accounts Payable Check 215.67
135481 11/30/2012 COASTAL REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 131.68
135482 11/30/2012 COLONY AUTO SERVICE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 279.66
135483 11/30/2012 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 159.60
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of November 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
135484 11/30/2012 CULLIGAN/CENTRAL COAST WTR TRT Accounts Payable Check 70.00
135485 11/30/2012 DARRYUS LOCK AND SAFE Accounts Payable Check 6.44
135486 11/30/2012 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Accounts Payable Check 558.00
135487 11/30/2012 DRIVE CUSTOMS Accounts Payable Check 2,855.51
135488 11/30/2012 EL CAMINO VETERINARY HOSP Accounts Payable Check 2,231.80
135489 11/30/2012 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SPEC., INC. Accounts Payable Check 20.00
135490 11/30/2012 ESCUELA DEL RIO Accounts Payable Check 200.00
135491 11/30/2012 FEDERAL EXPRESS Accounts Payable Check 5.96
135492 11/30/2012 FERRELL'SAUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 2,022.44
135493 11/30/2012 FIRST TRANSIT, INC. Accounts Payable Check 21,355.98
135494 11/30/2012 FLY MEAT.COM Accounts Payable Check 45.95
135495 11/30/2012 KEN FORMAN Accounts Payable Check 10.00
135496 11/30/2012 GARRY BRILL PRODUCTIONS Accounts Payable Check 150.00
135497 11/30/2012 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 519.05
135498 11/30/2012 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 554.30
135499 11/30/2012 GRANT WRITING USA Accounts Payable Check 425.00
135500 11/30/2012 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 4.05
135501 11/30/2012 GSA- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Accounts Payable Check 602.98
135502 11/30/2012 THE GUTTERMAN RAIN GUTTERS Accounts Payable Check 173.00
135503 11/30/2012 BRADLEYA. HACKLEMAN Accounts Payable Check 534.90
135504 11/30/2012 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 223.30
135505 11/30/2012 HOME DEPOT Accounts Payable Check 1,103.76
135506 11/30/2012 JEFF HUMPHREY Accounts Payable Check 145.00
135507 11/30/2012 IMPACT ABSORBENTS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 721.43
135508 11/30/2012 INHOUSE SECURITY SERVICE, LLC Accounts Payable Check 767.75
135509 11/30/2012 INSITECIVIL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 3,800.00
135510 11/30/2012 J. CARROLL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 623.64
135511 11/30/2012 TOM JAMASON Accounts Payable Check 125.95
135512 11/30/2012 JK'S UNLIMITED Accounts Payable Check 4,897.02
135513 11/30/2012 K&M INTERNATIONAL Accounts Payable Check 165.09
135514 11/30/2012 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER Accounts Payable Check 1,386.00
135515 11/30/2012 LIFE ASSIST, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,081.05
135516 11/30/2012 LUBE N GO Accounts Payable Check 255.27
135517 11/30/2012 MID-COAST GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,820.00
135518 11/30/2012 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW, INC. Accounts Payable Check 25.69
135519 11/30/2012 MILLENNIUM CONSULTING ASSC. Accounts Payable Check 640.20
135520 11/30/2012 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 424.60
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of November 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
135521 11/30/2012 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 402.87
135522 11/30/2012 REON C MONSON Accounts Payable Check 225.00
135523 11/30/2012 MICHAL S. MOSES Accounts Payable Check 951.20
135524 11/30/2012 OFFICE DEPOT INC. Accounts Payable Check 69.68
135525 11/30/2012 O'REILLYAUTOMOTIVE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 25.48
135526 11/30/2012 PACIFIC COAST GYMNASTICS CENTE Accounts Payable Check 373.10
135527 11/30/2012 PASO ROBLES FORD LINCOLN MERC Accounts Payable Check 41.56
135528 11/30/2012 PERFORMANCE SWEEPING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 960.00
135529 11/30/2012 PHILLIPS INTERNATIONAL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 240.60
135530 11/30/2012 PLUS 4 ENGINEERING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 78.90
135531 11/30/2012 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY,INC. Accounts Payable Check 869.00
135532 11/30/2012 PRP COMPANIES Accounts Payable Check 305.00
135533 11/30/2012 REDWOOD TOXICOLOGY LABORATORY Accounts Payable Check 142.93
135534 11/30/2012 CHRISTOPHER R. ROBINSON Accounts Payable Check 200.00
135535 11/30/2012 ERIN RUSSELL Accounts Payable Check 648.90
135536 11/30/2012 JOHN C. SIEMENS Accounts Payable Check 329.00
135537 11/30/2012 SLO CO FIRE Accounts Payable Check 450.00
135538 11/30/2012 SLO COUNTY RECORDER Accounts Payable Check 62.00
135539 11/30/2012 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY Accounts Payable Check 734.46
135540 11/30/2012 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN Accounts Payable Check 440.73
135541 11/30/2012 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1,001.00
135542 11/30/2012 TOYSMITH Accounts Payable Check 152.21
135543 11/30/2012 TY, INC. Accounts Payable Check 72.90
135544 11/30/2012 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE/NEOPOST Accounts Payable Check 5,000.00
135545 11/30/2012 UNCLE'S BAITS Accounts Payable Check 62.85
135546 11/30/2012 UNITED STAFFING ASSOCIATES,LLC Accounts Payable Check 1,584.00
135547 11/30/2012 US NIGHTVISION CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 3,075.61
135548 11/30/2012 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check 4,519.92
135549 11/30/2012 WEST COAST AUTO&TOWING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 50.00
135550 11/30/2012 WHYTAL PACIFIC Accounts Payable Check 137.03
135551 11/30/2012 ZOO MED LABORATORIES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 382.81
$ 6,157,614.55
ITEM NUMBER: A- 7
DATE: 01/08/13
mi rloi,� m
191s � : 1979
A tascadero City Council
Staff Report — Public Works Department
Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement with the
San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority
RECOMMENDATION:
Council adopt the Draft Resolution approving the amended San Luis Obispo Regional
Transit Authority Joint Powers Agreement.
DISCUSSION:
The County of San Luis Obispo and all of the cities within the County, including
Atascadero, are members of the Regional transit Authority (RTA). The purpose of the
Authority is to operate and administer the countywide transportation agency. In 1990,
the parties were signatories to the original Joint Powers Agreement (JPA). The JPA
was subsequently amended in 1998. Recently, the Executive Director reported to the
Board that the JPA does not provide member cities with the ability to appoint alternate
representatives. In addition, the JPA does not expressly provide the organization with
the ability to incur debt.
RTA staff worked with the RTA Counsel to review the current JPA document and to
develop language that would address the two issues noted above. In redrafting the
agreement, RTA's Counsel also took the opportunity to update the documents. These
changes are relatively minor and relate to changing references to the organization from
"SLORTA" to "RTA" and changing the title from "Transit Manager" to "Executive
Director" where appropriate. All changes to the JPA must be ratified by each member
agency and the County. The final JPA must also be submitted to the Secretary of State
within 30 days of the effective date of the amended JPA.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact to the City associated with adoption of the amended Joint
Powers Agreement.
ITEM NUMBER: A- 7
DATE: 01/08/13
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Resolution
2. Amended Joint Powers Agreement
3. Joint Powers Agreement demonstrating recommended changes with str;U ts
and underlining.
ITEM NUMBER: A- 7
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 1
DRAFT RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE AMENDED JOINT
POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND THE
INCORPORATED CITIES WITHIN THE COUNTY FOR THE SAN LUIS
OBISPO REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, Section 6500 et seq. of the California Government Code (Title 1, Div. 7,
Chapter 5, Article 1) provides for agreements between two or more public agencies to jointly
exercise any power common to the contracting parties, subject to certain mandatory provisions
contained therein; and,
WHEREAS, the Cities and County have previously entered into a joint powers
agreement for the formation of the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments for the purpose of
providing, among other things, a regional transit joint powers agreement; and,
WHEREAS, the Cities and the County have previously entered into a joint powers
agreement to provide regional transportation services in 1990, and the Cities and the County
amended said joint powers agreement in 1998; and,
WHEREAS, there is further need to amend the agreement to provide for alternate
members, permit the organization to incur debt, and make other minor modifications.
NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED, THAT
1. The amended San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority Joint Powers Agreement as
incorporated herein by reference is hereby approved; and,
2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign the amended agreement on behalf of the City of
Atascadero.
On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
ITEM NUMBER: A- 7
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 1
CITY OF ATASCADERO
Tom O'Malley, Mayor
ATTEST:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney
ITEM NUMBER: A- 7
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
SAN LUIS OBISPO REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
WITNESSETH:
This Agreement is made and entered into this 9'" day of March, 1990, and amended on
2nd day of September, 1998, and further amended on , 2012, by and
among the incorporated cities of Arroyo Grande, Atascadero, EL Paso de Robles,
Grover Beach, Morro Bay, Pismo Beach and San Luis Obispo, all being municipal
corporations in the County of San Luis Obispo, California (hereinafter called "Cities")
and the County of San Luis Obispo, a body politic and corporate, and a subdivision of
the State of California, (hereinafter called "County").
WHEREAS, Section 6500 et seq. of the California Government Code (Title 1,
Div. 7, Chapter 5, Article 1) provides for agreements between two or more public
agencies to jointly exercise any power common to the contracting parties, subject to
certain mandatory provisions contained therein; and
WHEREAS, the Cities and County have previously entered into a joint powers
agreement for the formation of the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments for the
purpose of providing, among other things, for a regional transportation agency; and
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments, at a regularly held
meeting on May 10, 1989, voted to consolidate the administration of several
transportation systems through a regional transit joint powers agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:
ARTICLE I
General Provisions
Section 1 . Purpose: The purpose of this Agreement is to exercise the common
powers of the member agencies for the formation of a Joint Powers Agreement with full
power and authority to own, operate and administer a county-wide public transportation
system within the boundaries and over the territory over which the Joint Powers Agency
has jurisdiction.
Section 2. Name: The official name of the entity shall be San Luis Obispo
Regional Transit Authority and hereafter referred to as RTA.
ITEM NUMBER: A- 7
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
ARTICLE II
Organization
Section 1. Board Members: The membership of the RTA Governing Board shall
be the same as the membership of the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments
(hereinafter referred to as SLOCOG).
Section 2. Board Meetings - Voting - Quorum: Regular meetings shall be
generally held in the first week of July, September, November, January, March and May
or as specified in a biannually adopted meeting calendar. Special meetings may be
called by the President or upon written request of at least three (3) members of the RTA
Board.
Voting and quorum provisions shall be the same as those provided in the
SLOCOG Joint Powers Agreement.
Section 3. Officers: The officers of SLOCOG shall serve as officers of RTA.
Section 4. Executive Director: The RTA Board shall designate an Executive
Director to operate RTA. The Executive Director shall serve at the pleasure of the RTA
Board, with delegated powers to certify documents of the RTA Board as required by the
law and to assume such duties and responsibilities as the Board may direct.
Section 5. Members:
1. The County of San Luis Obispo and all cities incorporated in the County of
San Luis Obispo presently or in the future, are declared eligible for
membership.
2. Member city agencies may elect to have an alternate member(s) from
their city council in addition to any official member, but said alternate(s)
shall be able to vote only in the absence of the official representative.
3. Membership shall be contingent upon the execution of this Joint Powers
Agreement.
Section 6. Boundaries and Service Levels: The service area boundaries shall be
all of the area within the boundaries of San Luis Obispo County as designated by the
RTA Board. Any additional services beyond the level recommended by the Regional
Transportation Plan or mandated in the Unmet Transit Needs Hearing (PUC Section
99401.5) may be instituted, but shall require unanimous approval of affected
jurisdictions, with costs for the extra service to be distributed on the basis of formula
developed by the RTA Board members representing the affected jurisdictions.
ITEM NUMBER: A- 7
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
Section 7. Committees:
1. Committees and subcommittees may be established as RTA may deem
appropriate.
2. Membership on "ad-Hoc" policy committees shall be at the discretion of
the President. Nothing herein shall be construed to limit membership on
these aforesaid committees to officials of the member agencies. The
President may appoint any individual deemed qualified to serve on a
committee.
3. Standing committees shall include the:
a. Regional Transit Advisory Committee (RTAC) serving as a
Regional Transit Productivity Committee to advise the Board on the
efficiency and effectiveness of the transit system.
b. An Executive Committee comprised of the President, Vice
President and the past President and at least one representatives
from the county of San Luis Obispo (if none of the above) shall
advise the Executive Director and RTA on: draft agendas,
personnel issues, budget and Overall Work Program; controversial,
sensitive and major policy issues; and shall facilitate the annual
performance evaluation of the Executive Director. Items for review
shall be selected by the Executive Director in consultation with the
President. All Committee members may include agenda items as
they desire. For purposes of conducting business, two members
shall constitute a quorum.
4. No committee shall commit RTA on any matter or questions of policy.
Such matters or questions can only be decided by RTA.
5. All committees shall receive clerical assistance from RTA staff and, by
agreement, SLOCOG staff for the purpose of maintaining minutes of
meetings and other such duties as the Executive Director may direct. The
chair of each committee shall sign the original copy of the minutes
indicating verification of contents upon committee adoption. Copies of
minutes of all meetings shall be sent to members of RTA and the
Executive Director.
ARTICLE 111
Financial Provisions
Section 1. Budget: The Executive Director shall prepare an annual budget for
RTA adoption prior to commencement of each fiscal year. The approval of the Annual
ITEM NUMBER: A- 7
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
Budget shall be in accordance with those procedures prescribed by the Joint Powers
Agreement of SLOCOG.
Accounting practices to be applied will conform with those used by San Luis
Obispo County, consistent with Transportation Development Act rules and regulations.
A Consolidated Fund balance and cash balance will carry forward from one year
to the next.
The budget may additionally carry funds for future fiscal years where necessary
to develop a multi-year Capital Improvement Program and to reflect obligations under
state or federal funding agreements, to the extent allowable by California law.
No member Agency shall be required to expend any of its general fund monies
to support the operations of RTA. The operation of the transit system shall be funded
from revenues derived from operations, member Transportation Development Act fund
contributions, grants, and any other appropriate revenue sources. Each member
agency shall make an annual contribution to RTA in accordance with the adopted
budget.
Any formula may be amended upon approval of all jurisdictions affected by that
formula and ratified by RTA.
All population percentages utilized shall be those annually adopted by SLOCOG
for allocating Transportation Development Act Funds based annually on estimates
prepared by the State Department of Finance pursuant to Section 2227 of the Revenue
and Taxation Code for cities and by the County Planning Department for
unincorporated communities.
Section 2. Expenditures: RTA may establish procedures and policies to insure
competitive prices for the purchases of goods and services. Formal bidding shall not be
required unless directed specifically by RTA or unless required by state or federal law.
Particularly in the purchase of equipment, including buses, RTA may consider the
design, maintenance and operating costs, and other similar factors in determining the
most suitable equipment and need not purchase equipment having the lowest initial
cost.
Section 3. Treasurer and Auditor: Pursuant to Government Code Section 6505.5,
the Treasurer of the County of San Luis Obispo is hereby designated as Treasurer of
RTA. The Treasurer shall have the powers and duties set forth in Government Code
Section 6505.5. The Auditor/Controller of the County of San Luis Obispo is designated
as the Auditor of RTA pursuant to Government Code Section 6505.5.
Section 4. Annual Audit: RTA shall cause an annual audit to be prepared and
filed in accordance with Government Code Section 6505 and Public Utilities Code
Section 99245.
ITEM NUMBER: A- 7
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
Section 5. Annual Report: The Executive Director shall prepare and submit an
annual report of the operations to the RTA Board, SLOCOG and State Controller within
90 days of the end of the fiscal year pursuant to Public Utilities Code, Section 99243.
Section 6. Periodic Reporting: The RTA Board may require periodic reporting of
ridership, finances, or other information. It shall be the responsibility of the Executive
Director to provide such reports in a form acceptable to the RTA Board.
ARTICLE IV
Authority
Section 1. Powers: RTA shall have all Powers necessary to carry out the
purpose of this Agreement, except the power to tax. Its power to expend funds shall be
limited only by the availability of funds as set forth in ARTICLE III: Finances, Section 1.
The Powers of RTA specifically include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. To solicit bids and negotiate contracts from private enterprise for services
and/or operation.
2. To sue or be sued.
3. To employ agents, employees and contract for professional services.
4. To make and enter contracts, including labor, purchase agreement and
employment contracts.
5. To acquire, convey, construct, manage, maintain and operate necessary
equipment, building and improvements.
6. To acquire and convey real and personal property.
7. To incur debts, liabilities and obligations, as well as obligations of financial
assistance from State and Federal agencies, and to obligate RTA to
operate the improvements, equipment or transportation system in
accordance with the terms and conditions of said financial assistance.
Section 2. RTA is a Public Legal Entity: RTA is a public entity duly formed and
existing under the laws of the State of California. It is a separate and distinct legal entity
from its member agencies. The debts, duties and obligations created pursuant to this
Agreement, shall be solely the obligations of RTA and not those of its officers,
employees, members of the Board of Directors or the member agencies.
ITEM NUMBER: A- 7
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
ARTICLE V
Miscellaneous Provisions
Section 1. Withdrawal of Member: A withdrawing member's financial obligation
under this Section is limited to the withdrawing member's pro-rata share of the currently
adopted operating budget based upon ARTICLE III, Section 1 within the service area of
the obligated commitments affecting the withdrawing member and any SLOCOG's
finding as to unmet transit needs that are reasonable to meet pursuant to Public Utilities
Code Section 99401.5.
Section 2. Amendment of Agreement: No amendment to this Agreement shall be
made without the consent of all member agencies at the time of the amendment.
Section 3. Ratification - Effective Date: This Agreement shall be deemed
effective as to those parties executing this agreement upon their execution of the
agreement.
Section 4. Assignability: In the event it is deemed in the best public interest to
have RTA operated by another individual or entity, whether public or private, and
provided that the assignment complies with State and Federal laws, the agency on
affirmative vote of the majority in accordance with Section 2 of ARTICLE II, may sell,
lease or assign all of its real and personal property and cease operations upon such
terms and conditions as RTA determines to be reasonable.
Section 5. Termination: This Agreement shall continue in full force and effect
until rescinded by a majority of the member agencies.
Section 6. Notification to Secretary of State: Pursuant to Government Code
Section 6503.5, RTA shall cause a notice of the execution of this Agreement to be
prepared and filed with the Office of the Secretary of the State of California, within thirty
(30) days after the effective date of any amendment to this Agreement. Until such filings
are completed, RTA shall not incur indebtedness of any kind.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the
day and year first hereinabove written.
ITEM NUMBER: A- 7
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
City of Arroyo Grande
By: Date:
Resolution No.
Clerk
City of Atascadero
By: Date:
Resolution No.
Clerk
City of Grover Beach
By: Date:
Resolution No.
Clerk
City of Morro Bay
By: Date:
Resolution No.
Clerk
City of Paso Robles
By: Date:
Resolution No.
Clerk
City of Pismo Beach
By: Date:
Resolution No.
Clerk
ITEM NUMBER: A- 7
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
City of San Luis Obispo
By: Date:
Resolution No.
Clerk
County of San Luis Obispo
By: Date:
Resolution No.
Clerk
Approved as to form and legal effect:
TIM MCNULTY
County Counsel
By:
Deputy County Counsel
Date:
ITEM NUMBER: A- 7
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 3
SAN LUIS OBISPO REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
WITNESSETH:
This Agreement is made and entered into this 9t" day of March, 1990, and
amended on 9/2/$82nd day of September, 1998, and further amended on
2012, by and among the incorporated cities of Arroyo Grande,
Atascadero, EL Paso de Robles, Grover Beach, Morro Bay, Pismo Beach and San Luis
Obispo, all being municipal corporations in the County of San Luis Obispo, California
(hereinafter called "Cities") and the County of San Luis Obispo, a body politic and
corporate, and a subdivision of the State of California, (hereinafter called "County").
WHEREAS, Section 6500 et seq. of the California Government Code (Title 1,
Div. 7, Chapter 5, Article 1) provides for agreements between two or more public
agencies to jointly exercise any power common to the contracting parties, subject to
certain mandatory provisions contained therein; and
WHEREAS, the Cities and County have previously entered into a joint powers
agreement for the formation of the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments for the
purpose of providing, among other things, for a regional transportation agency; and
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments, at a regularly held
meeting on May 10, 1989, voted to consolidate the administration of several
transportation systems through a regional transit joint powers agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:
ARTICLE I
General Provisions
Section 1 . Purpose: The purpose of this Agreement is to exercise the common
powers of the member agencies for the formation of a Joint Powers Agreement with full
power and authority to own, operate and administer a county-wide public transportation
system within the boundaries and over the territory over which the Joint Powers Agency
has jurisdiction.
Section 2. Name: The official name of the entity shall be San Luis Obispo
Regional Transit Authority and hereafter referred to as SLORTARTA.
ARTICLE II
Organization
Section 1. Board Members: The membership of the SLORT°RTA Governing
Board; shall be the same as the membership of the San Luis Obispo Council of
Governments (hereinafter referred to as SLOCOG).
ITEM NUMBER: A- 7
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 3
Section 2. Board Meetings - Voting - Quorum: Regular meetings shall be
generally held in the first week of July, September, November, January, March and May
or as specified in a biannually adopted meeting calendar. Special meetings may be
called by the President or upon written request of at least three (3) members of the
SLORT-ARTA Board.
Voting and quorum provisions shall be the same as those provided in the
SLOCOG Joint Powers Agreement.
Section 3. Officers: The officers of SLOCOG shall serve as officers of the Tart
Aytherit-yRTA.
Section 4. MapagefExecutive Director: The SLORTARTA Board shall designate
nay TraRSit nn eran Executive Director to operate SLORTARTA. The
manager.Executive Director shall serve at the pleasure of the SLORTARTA Board, with
delegated powers to certify documents of the SLORTARTA Board as required by the
law and to assume such duties and responsibilities as the Board may direct.
Section 5. Members:
1. The County of San Luis Obispo and all cities incorporated in the County of
San Luis Obispo presently or in the future, are declared eligible for
membership.
2. Member city agencies may elect to have an alternate member(s) from
their city council in addition to any official member, but said alternate(s)
shall be able to vote only in the absence of the official representative.
3. Membership shall be contingent upon the execution of this Joint Powers
Agreement.
Section 6. Boundaries and Service Levels: The service area boundaries shall be
all of the area within the boundaries of San Luis Obispo County as designated by the
SLORTARTA Board. Any additional services beyond the level recommended by the
Regional Transportation Plan or mandated in the Unmet Transit Needs Hearing (PUC
Section 99401.5) may be instituted, but shall require unanimous approval of affected
jurisdictions, with costs for the extra service to be distributed on the basis of formula
developed by the SLORTARTA Board members representing the affected jurisdictions.
Section 7. Committees:
1. Committees and subcommittees may be established as SLORTARTA
may deem appropriate.
2. Membership on "ad-Hoc" policy committees shall be at the discretion of
the President. Nothing herein shall be construed to limit membership on
these aforesaid committees to officials of the member agencies. The
ITEM NUMBER: A- 7
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 3
President may appoint any individual deemed qualified to serve on a
committee.
3. Standing committees shall include the:
a. Regional Transit Advisory Committee (RTAC) serving as a
Regional Transit Productivity Committee to advise the Board on the
efficiency and effectiveness of the transit system.
b. An Executive Committee comprised of the President, Vice
President and the past President and at least one representatives
from the county of San Luis Obispo (if none of the above) shall
advise the Transit Manage-Executive Director and SLORTA RTA
on: draft agendas, personnel issues, budget and Overall Work
Program; controversial, sensitive and major policy issues; and shall
facilitate the annual performance evaluation of the RegiORal Tronci+
nn KjefExecutive Director. Items for review shall be selected by
the TraRSit Manage-Executive Director in consultation with the
President. All Committee members may include agenda items as
they desire. For purposes of conducting business, two members
shall constitute a quorum.
4. No committee shall commit SLO,RTARTA on any matter or questions of
policy. Such matters or questions can only be decided by SLOQTARTA.
5. All committees shall receive clerical assistance from S'�TARTA staff
and, by agreement, SLOCOG staff for the purpose of maintaining minutes
of meetings and other such duties as the Tronci+ Manage-Executive
Director may direct. The chair of each committee shall sign the original
copy of the minutes indicating verification of contents upon committee
adoption. Copies of minutes of all meetings shall be sent to members of
SLORTARTA and the TraRSi+ Manage Executive Director.
ARTICLE III
Financial Provisions
Section 1 . Budget: The Q na' Tronci Manage-rExecutive Director shall
prepare an annual budget for Transit o„+h„ri+„RTA adoption prior to commencement of
each fiscal year. The approval of the Annual Budget shall be in accordance with those
procedures prescribed by the Joint Powers Agreement of SLOCOG.
Accounting practices to be applied will conform with those used by San Luis
Obispo County, consistent with Transportation Development Act rules and regulations.
A Consolidated Fund balance and cash balance will carry forward from one year
to the next.
ITEM NUMBER: A- 7
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 3
The budget may additionally carry funds for future fiscal years where necessary
to develop a multi-year Capital Improvement Program and to reflect obligations under
state of-or federal funding agreements, to the extent allowable by California law.
No member Agency shall be required to expend any of its general fund monies
to support the operations of the Transit AlitherityRTA. The operation of the transit
system shall be funded from revenues derived from operations, member Transportation
Development Act fund contributions, grants, and any other appropriate revenue
sources. Each member agency shall make an annual contribution to the Trai t
A erityRTA in accordance with the adopted budget.
Any formula may be amended upon approval of all jurisdictions affected by that
formula and ratified by the T-FaRslt A i ithnr4RTA.
All population percentages utilized shall be those annually adopted by SLOCOG
for allocating Transportation Development Act Funds based annually on estimates
prepared by the State Department of Finance pursuant to Section 2227 of the Revenue
and Taxation Code for cities and by the County Planning Department for
unincorporated communities.
Section 2. Expenditures: The Transit AuthorifiiRTA may establish procedures
and policies to insure competitive prices for the purchases of goods and services.
Formal bidding shall not be required unless directed specifically by the Transit
n�nth—rityRTA or unless required by state or federal law. Particularly in the purchase of
equipment, including buses, the Transit AutherityRTA may consider the design,
maintenance and operating costs, and other similar factors in determining the most
suitable equipment and need not purchase equipment having the lowest initial cost.
Section 3. Treasurer and Auditor: Pursuant to Government Code Section 6505.5,
the Treasurer of the County of San Luis Obispo is hereby designated as Treasurer of
the Transit AutheritRTA. The Treasurer shall have the powers and duties set forth in
Government Code Section 6505.5. The Auditor/Controller of the County of San Luis
Obispo is designated as the Auditor of this Transit Ai itherit„RTA pursuant to
Government Code Section 6505.5.
Section 4. Annual Audit: The Transit Ai itherityRTA shall cause an annual audit to
be prepared and filed in accordance with Government Code Section 6505 and Public
Utilities Code Section 99245.
Section 5. Annual Report: The Regienal Transit MonolvorExecutive Director shall
prepare and submit an annual; report of the operations to the Transit Auth„rltyRTA
Board, SLOCOG and State Controller within 90 days of the end of the fiscal year
pursuant to Public Utilities Code, Section 99243.
Section 6. Periodic Reporting: The Transit A,itherit„RTA Board may require
periodic reporting of ridership, finances, or other information. It shall be the
responsibility of the Regional Transit ManExecutiveDirector and GentraGtOF (i
ITEM NUMBER: A- 7
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 3
apprepriate4-to provide such reports in a form acceptable to the Transit A„th„rityRTA
Board.
ARTICLE IV
Authority
Section 1 . Powers: The Transit Autherlt\/RTA shall have all Powers necessary to
carry out the purpose of this Agreement, except the power to tax. Its power to expend
funds shall be limited only by the availability of funds as set forth in ARTICLE III:
Finances, Section 1. The Powers of the Tom;a„sit u hherityRTA specifically include, but
are not limited to, the following:
1. To solicit bids and negotiate contracts from private enterprise for services
and/or operation.
2. To sue or be sued.
3. To employ agents, employees and contract for professional services.
4. To make and enter contracts including labor, purchase agreement and
employment contracts.
5. To acquire, convey, construct, manage, maintain and operate necessary
equipment, building and improvements.
6. To acquire and convey real and personal property.
7. To incur debts, liabilities and obligations, as well as obligations of financial
assistance from State and Federal agencies and to obligate the Transit
A��therityRTA to operate the improvements, equipment or transportation
system in accordance with the terms and conditions of said financial
assistance.
Section 2. TraRsot A,itheritvRTA is a Public Legal Entity: The
Auth-rityRTA is a public entity duly formed and existing under the laws of the State of
California. It is a separate and distinct legal entity from its member agencies. The debts,
duties and obligations created pursuant to this Agreement, shall be solely the
obligations of the Transit A,ithr4RTA and not those of its officers, employees,
members of the Board of Directors or the member agencies.
ARTICLE V
Miscellaneous Provisions
Section 1. Withdrawal of Member: A withdrawing member's financial obligation
under this Section is limited to the withdrawing member's pro-rata share of the currently
adopted operating budget based upon ARTICLE III, Section 1 within the service area of
the obligated commitments affecting the withdrawing member and any SLOCOG's
ITEM NUMBER: A- 7
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 3
finding as to unmet transit needs that are reasonable to meet pursuant to Public Utilities
Code Section 99401.5.
Section 2. Amendment of Agreement: No amendment to this Agreement shall be
made without the consent of all member agencies at the time of the amendment.
Section 3. Ratification - Effective Date: This Agreement shall be deemed
effective as to those parties executing this agreement upon their execution of the
agreement.
Section 4. Assignability: In the event it is deemed in the best public interest to
have the TFaRSit Ai ithnrityRTA operated by another individual or entity, whether public
or private, and provided that the assignment complies with State and Federal laws, the
agency on affirmative vote of the majority in accordance with Section 2 of ARTICLE II,
may sell, lease or assign all of its real and personal property and cease operations
upon such terms and conditions as the TraRsit AutherityBTA determines to be
reasonable.
Section 5. Termination: This Agreement shall continue in full force and effect
until rescinded by a majority of the member agencies.
Section 6. Notification to Secretary of State: Pursuant to Government Code
Section 6503.5, the Transit o„theri+„RTA shall cause a notice of the execution of this
Agreement to be prepared and filed with the Office of the Secretary of the State of
California, within thirty (30) days after the effective date of any amendment to this
Agreement. Until such filings are completed, the Tinh�tyRTA shall not incur
indebtedness of any kind.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the
day and year first hereinabove written.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and
year first hereinabove written.
City of Arroyo Grande
By: Date:
Resolution No.
Clerk
City of Atascadero
By: Date:
Resolution No.
Clerk
ITEM NUMBER: A- 7
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 3
City of Grover Beach
By: Date:
Resolution No.
Clerk
City of Morro Bay
By: Date:
Resolution No.
Clerk
City of Paso Robles
By: Date:
Resolution No.
Clerk
City of Pismo Beach
By: Date:
Resolution No.
Clerk
City of San Luis Obispo
By: Date:
Resolution No.
Clerk
County of San Luis Obispo
By: Date:
Resolution No.
Clerk
ITEM NUMBER: A- 7
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 3
Approved as to form and legal effect:
TIM MCNULTY
County Counsel
By:
Deputy County Counsel
Date:
ITEM NUMBER: A- 8
DATE: 01/08/13
� nAp'
iiia' X79'x7
CAD_-
_;sem moi
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — City Manager's Office
Amendments to Salary Schedule and Approval of New Staff Positions
from Salary Savings
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Council:
1. Concur with the administrative reorganization as recommended by the City
Manager, and
2. Extend the existing salary schedule through June 30, 2013 and amend said
schedule to include the following positions:
• Senior Building Maintenance Specialist: Range 18
• Personnel Specialist- Confidential: Range 24c
• Management Analyst I- Confidential: Range 24c
• Public Works Operations Manager: Range 27
• Information Technology Manager: Range 38
DISCUSSION:
A few key employees have recently left the organization or will soon be leaving. These
employees have been important to the success of the organization and will be missed.
With their departure and these positions being vacant, a significant salary savings is
realized.
As the City moves forward to the challenges of 2013 and beyond, the Management
Team has been concentrating on what is needed to be successful in the future as
opposed to what is lost in these transitions. The team investigated many alternatives
and opportunities. A priority that was agreed to was to continue to maintain capacity,
invest in the future and "put more boots on the ground" so the City has the hands
needed to do the work as the economy begins to recover.
ITEM NUMBER: A- 8
DATE: 01/08/13
Based on the work of the Management Team, and input from our employees and
employee unions/associations, a plan has been assembled to guide the City through the
next several years. The plan involves:
• Deleting 4 positions, mostly management (creates salary savings),
• Reorganizing work and management responsibilities,
• Adding positions to fill strategic City needs ,
• Reclassifying several employees who have been and will continue to work out of
class as we expect more from them.
The following summarizes the actions taking place:
Deleted Positions:
1. Assistant City Manager
2. Community Services Director
3. Deputy Director Operations Public Works
4. Inspector - Environmental Compliance
New Positions:
1. Maintenance Worker 1 — PW Operations Range 8
2. Maintenance Worker 1 — Wastewater Range 8
3. Senior Building Maintenance Specialist: Range 18
4. Personnel Specialist- Confidential: Range 24c
5. Management Analyst I- Confidential: Range 24c
6. Public Works Operations Manager: Range 27
7. Information Technology Manager: Range 38
The two Maintenance Worker 1 positions will be added personnel; the remaining
positions will be internal recruitments or reclassifications. Several positions (Personnel
Specialist-Confidential, Senior Building Maintenance Specialist and Public Works
Operations Manager) were reclassified to recognize the higher levels of expertise and
responsibility being expected of those employees. In some instances, the
reclassifications required new titles to properly reflect the duties and responsibilities
being performed by the employee. As such, the City's salary schedule must be
amended to include these new titles. All reclassified positions will be moved to existing
salary ranges, thus the following ranges on the salary schedule will be amended to
read:
ITEM NUMBER: A- 8
DATE: 01/08/13
CLASSIFICATION RANGE STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E
Engineering Technician II
Recreation Coordinator
Senior Building Maintenance Specialist 18 3,504.63 3,679.87 3,863.83 4,057.03 4,259.85
Accounting Specialist-Confidential
Personnel Specialist-Confidential
Management Analyst I-Confidential 24c 4,155.98 4,363.78 4,581.97 4,811.07 5,051.63
Executive Assistant
GIS Analyst 1 25 4,155.98 4,363.78 4,581.96 4,811.07 5,051.61
Building Maintenance Supervisor
Bldg Inspector/Plans Examiner
Capital Projects Manager
Public Works Operations Manager 27 4,363.78 4,581.97 4,811.07 5,051.61 5,304.19
Database Programmer
Information Technology Manager 38 5,708.69 5,994.12 6,293.79 6,608.47 6,938.88
Note: Proposed changes to the above ranges on the currently published salary schedule are shown in bold. No other changes to the
existing salary schedule are being proposed.
The personnel actions being taken are an important initiative for the organization and
will move the City toward continued success as we enter 2013. These actions impact
the total organization and deal with the most critical concerns expressed by our
employees. They are consistent with the City Council's Mission Statement:
The City of Atascadero is committed to building community by fostering an
outstanding quality of life with excellent public service, stewardship of the
environment, preservation of our heritage and promotion of economic prosperity.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Salary savings from deleted or frozen positions: $658,300
Cost of new positions: ($342,600)
Cost of Reclassifications: ( 50,600)
Total Impact (Net Salary Savings) $265,100
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
r�mh" ,4 L
�I 1918 r
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — Community Development
2013 Strategic Planning Update
Community Development Department /
Economic Development
RECOMMENDATION:
Council receive and file this report.
DISCUSSION:
Background: Since 2009, the City Council's number one goal has been to grow the
City's economy and to create a "business friendly" culture and atmosphere at City Hall.
Great strides have been made in both of these areas and work continues to be done.
Many of the City's economic development and business friendly priorities involve the
Community Development Department. In addition to these priorities, the Community
Development Department has a number of other projects and mandates that will require
attention over the next budget cycle.
Summary: This report provides an overview of the City's accomplishments and
upcoming programs, projects and mandates. Over the next budget cycle, the
Community Development Department will need to allocate staff resources to the
following-
1.
ollowing:1. Office of Economic Development
2. Design Review Committee
3. Permit Streamlining / Customer Service
4. Economic Development Hot Spots
5. 2013 California Building Code Adoption
6. Dormant Permit Program
7. Historic City Hall Return / New Permit Center
8. Public Record Request Improvements
9. Zoning Code Update
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
10. Walmart / Annex
11. Eagle Ranch
12. Marriott Spring Hill Suites Hotel
13. Housing Tract Restarts
14. Housing Element Implementation / 2014 Regional Housing Needs Allocation
15. Native Tree Planting
16. Climate Action Plan
17. Stormwater Regulations
18. SLOCOG Salinas River Trail Master Plan
19. Affordable Housing Policy
Analysis:
1. Office of Economic Development Efforts
The Office of Economic Development (OED), created by the staff in 2009, has been the
driving force in managing the City's economic development programs, improving the
City's development processes, and building a "business friendly" climate that is the talk
of the County. In addition to being the primary contact for new business contacts,
commercial projects, and business relocations, the OED has focused on several
programs aimed at building up the City's commercial base and making it easier to do
business in Atascadero. Specifically to date, activities have included:
• Revising the business license application to make it easier to fill out and
understand.
• Reducing plan check timelines from 6-8 weeks to 2-4 weeks.
• Revising forms and counter materials to make them easier to understand and
easier to fill out.
• Creating of a new webpage with relevant information, interactive exhibits and a
comment/concerns submittal function, such as the Business Roadmap.
• Continuing dormant permits so they would not expire. The bulk of projects
underway today are the result of many of these permits being revived.
• Installing new permitting software and features that has facilitated and expedited
the permitting process.
• Creating clearer communications between the City and permit applicants to
ensure that processes and steps are more easily understood and that
requirements and timelines are clearly explained.
• Coordinating a number of small business success seminars and other important
educational forums that focused on financing, marketing and promotion.
• Increasing the number of over-the-counter permits available.
• Improving processes for staff review prior to project submission including
inspector site visits.
These visits to projects in the field have been very popular and provided not only
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
a great outreach tool and educational experience for staff, but have saved
applicants tens of thousands of dollars in fees to engineers, architects and other
professionals as corrections and resubmittals have been reduced.
The improvements have been received well and the City of Atascadero enjoys a very
good reputation within the development community for being "Business Friendly." Cities
across the County have also looked to the City of Atascadero for business friendly
ideas.
� • t
]EItm
raeSs perrni��
The OED prepared this "Roadmap"
checklist to assist new businesses in
open up in Atascadero.
❑ ltil
Pit 1a Beqin
City of Atascadero
_ ❑ Mile Post 4
rK II I , Pay fees and pick
I u�i�t X16 up permit
�.;, i• 1� I h
Cat
,• 1 i yl
i ..
• '' ' City
■
❑ Mile Post 2 t
Submit plans for
City review Mlle Post 7
❑ Mile Post 1 .�, Completion
Brinq in plans for t to check Oil ❑Final Inspections
preliminary review pachmt�PpS"roupa55 �� ❑BusinesstLice License
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
2. Design Review Committee (DRC)
Another key improvement in facilitating the development process has been the City
Council's creation of the Design Review Committee (DRC) in 2011 . The DRC
composition of two Council Members, two Planning Commissioners and an at large
member has been well received by the public. Applicants have consistently praised the
DRC process and appreciate being able to get a final design decision on a project
quickly.
The DRC has been able to resolve and expedite a number of development projects
such as the redesign of the Las Lomas apartments and tract homes. The DRC was
able to meet quickly and balance the concerns of the developer and neighbors. Without
the DRC, the Las Lomas project would have become bogged down in multiple Planning
Commission meetings and possible appeals. The DRC has also been very effective
r� ii� n iinrr ��mm�rni�l —hi+ren+i — —1 cirrn�rv� nrrir-n+c
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
3. Permit Streamlining/Customer Service
On September 27, 2012, staff from the Community Development, Public Works and Fire
Departments and the City Manager's Office met to evaluate the City's current process
and discuss ways things could continue to be made easier for our customers.
Discussions were very positive and a permit improvement work program was produced.
The following improvements will be implemented over the next 12-months:
• Update permit checklists with additional information to improve usefulness.
• Create a single inspection line to call for inspections.
• Hold "contractor workshops" with staff and California Code Check.
These workshops will create a forum to discuss questions and concerns about
the plan check process. The first workshop is scheduled for mid-January.
• Update the City's website to make it easier to navigate and find forms. As part of
this update, create a one-stop "form center" where all forms can be accessed.
• Utilize paid Cal Poly interns more as permit loads increase to handle day-to-day
questions and service needs allowing full-time staff to focus on larger projects
such as the hotel, Colony Square, Eagle Ranch, Walmart, etc.
• Improve the intake process to ensure complete plan sets are submitted;
communicate the importance of complete plans to the customers in speeding up
the plan check process.
• Begin field testing mobile computing for building inspections and finals.
• Hold a meeting with realtors to discuss the realities and timing of development-
related records requests.
• Develop a kiosk that would allow electronic records to be accessed by the public.
• Improve communications with customers to ensure requirements are clear,
understood, and that the staff conveys a helpful tone.
4. Economic Development Hotspots
In 2011 , the City Council identified a series of economic development "Hot Spots" in the
community that should be prioritized for City assistance. The idea was that the
Redevelopment Agency would provide assistance to prepare these sites for commercial
development. With the loss of RDA, the City's resources to assist Hot Spots are limited,
but creative solutions, like the Spring Hill Suite fee deferral are still possible. The
following Hot Spot sites were identified:
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
Site Status
1. Home Depot Center • Spring Hill Suite Hotel CUP approved
• Fee deferral agreement approved
• Next — expedite building permits
2. Walmart/Annex (Del Rio site) . General plan amendment / EIR approved
• Assisting on Annex site marketing
• Interchange design starting
• Lawsuit preparation
3. K-Mart Shopping Center corner . Sears/K-Mart opposed to corner property
sale. Staff tried several times to suggest
alternatives. Development will be difficult.
• Taco Bell has passed on site
4. Downtown / Hoff Property . Damaged buildings demolished
• On-going coordination meetings with
Hoff/Alvord family
• Assistance package possible (see following
section #13)
5. Colony Square . Phase 2 CUP amendment approved
• Building pad re-fencing done
• Marketing and tenant recruitment
coordination on-going
6. Spencer's Center/ • Meeting with representative of both
DeCou Lumber Property properties
• DeCou master plan concept prepared by
staff
7. Montecito Road abandoned . Abandoned motel units demolished
motel . Site marketing package prepared by staff
Staff has concentrated on these Hot Spots for development opportunities. Below is a
brief update on each:
1. Home Depot Center. The Home Depot center is adding a Hotel.
2. Walmart / Annex (Del Rio site). Walmart/Annex is still in litigation.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
3. K-Mart Shopping Center corner. The K-Mart shopping Center has had some
interest, although the corner property owner has been unwilling to work with
potential buyers.
4. Downtown / Hoff Property. The Hoff property has been a significant staff focus
as it is in the center of downtown. Until recently when the buildings were
demolished, it continued to be unsightly and was becoming an attractive
nuisance. Unfortunately, the owners of the property are not in a position
financially to begin development of the site. Incentives may be necessary to get
the project moving.
Staff have instigated a variety of options to move the project forward and at this
time believe the best alternative would be a third party acquire or partner with
existing owners in the development of the 1.5 acre parcel along with site
improvements and public parking. The former redevelopment agency paid to
have a site plan developed which is located below.
..
►lorltl �
• ts[Icm 1 r
dbodmlM In
sk..l m akm a r 7`l
.• / r
Maim Lobby to rIII
YCM o111
s I I••
•n°t,nwn garb[11M , r 1 r Th IV
wo snco•i sot'u.•r ! '" I
IS C t I •°%
to np«An. Pn-1all I ,lc— ttim.lb t � AIMO t.I 1 Nrgl wkh - 1
,I la aacw al 10 Moll YI—coma"10
•Il\rl'•!r:A°IN•Iprrminn WII°Yq t � t
I •t ' Cf 1 - (
• "'--I- I � .-+_•=moi_.-, •f�� .,y... � -
Uutao 5411 Area '�Oata00r obro wlln Soo A'ire ��-rrob l lraJ 71p��I-,J
Ihla IIR4�.1 JO!Y at �_ Aaalvulwr Stir—I Carnot L Ih.. WWII UUl IJrNo ARIA
Slq•nprt�[�Inle•eec Ann = 1•0dor•rtons Indo Pasco Aroa
A Camino Ramal
IMMI-0109 0t L-W.[1011,11th his n -
6
Outdoor Dlnlnq Area ■ �- o
•
•. � t W
r
Hott Property concept master plan prepared by the Atascadero Hedevelopment Agency
Staff has developed a potential incentive package. The package has been
shared with the property owners and potential development partners and
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
appears to be a viable incentive for spurring on development. A development
package could include one, some or all of the following items:
a. Development Fee Credits currently exist on the site based on the
buildings that were demolished. The credits have an estimated
value of $100,000 based on 10,000 square foot of building space
demolished at approximately $10 per square foot. The credits
could be advertised and add significant value to the project.
b. A fee deferral for balance of development fees could be offered
similar to what was done for the Marriot Spring Hill Suites. A
deferral could take place over 2-3 years and have a value of
approximately $100,000.
c. Street abandonments and public easement abandonments would
be necessary to develop the project as designed and could be done
at cost to the City and not the developer since the City has a public
interest in the project.
d. The City could consider contributing some funding to the frontage
and street improvements at and around the site.
e. The City could purchase or potentially enter into a long-term lease
for some parking spaces on the site to secure long-term public
parking. This would provide revenue to the project developer.
f. The City could commit to assist with business attraction efforts.
This would include creating materials to market the site and the
City's incentives. Additionally, the staff could meet with brokers
and business representatives.
g. As a joint partner on the project (public parking space development,
abandoning property, etc.) the City could waive certain entitlement
fees (CUP, lot line adjustments, etc.). The City could also take the
lead on any environmental work.
h. The City could prepare draft grading plan.
i. The City could facilitate discussions of property acquisition between
buyer, listing agent and property owner if desired.
j. The City could provide a preliminary economic analysis of area
including maps with traffic counts.
k. The City could consider allowing construction of a freeway pole
sign which would have significant value to potential tenants.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
5. Colony Square. Colony Square has amended the original development plans
which they are now marketing. The City helped with an event parking plan and
marketed alternative parking to assist the center.
6. Spencer's Center / DeCou Lumber Property. Staff has been working with the
property owners on site redesigns and potentials for getting greater private
investment. A potential site plan developed by staff is depicted below.
8550 4 86351 1� 666s �, 'l - 731,
9
8639
P7P3
8600
New street
a> connection to
0
shopping center P,
i•
.8710 70 ' 8789
O
8790
oyb;. 8740ItSo no Rd i eo7o
i.
8720 8740 t
O 6740
6740
8720 -
1 9060
New townhouses
') "( (Phase 3)
Chinese Buffet o
New shared
,8850
parking z
0038
8850. � _R ? �/ 6
t �
9030'..
Access Easement
New Retail
(Phase 2)
Remodel Store
'ss (Phase 1) '
\
Otl
DeCou Master Plan concept prepared by staff
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
7. Montecito Road abandoned motel. The Montecito site has been cleared.
Council should review the Hot Spots and make any changes necessary. The
Hoff property incentive proposals will be discussed at the strategic planning
workshop.
5. 2013 California Building Code Adoption
The State of California adopts an updated building code every three years known as the
California Building Code (CBC). The next CBC will become effective on January 1,
2014, and it is mandatory that the City of Atascadero adopt and enforce the code by
that date. The City may adopt local amendments that address unique local
circumstances as long as they are based on climatic, topographical or geological
conditions, and the amendments are more stringent than the CBC. These amendments
are referred to as the local building code and are contained in Title 8 of the Atascadero
Municipal Code. Staff will begin working on the local amendment process in July of
2013, with the goal of bringing the CBC plus local amendments to the City Council for
approval in the Fall of 2013.
The State has made significant changes to code in the past two cycles including new
accessibly requirements, mandatory residential fire sprinklers, a new residential code,
use of the international code as the model code, creation of a new Green Building Code
and more stringent energy requirements (Title 24). Staff expects significant changes to
the Green Building Code, energy requirement-, and anain
O \
oAo -ip Ro ni- ng
job
code
a� a�
C�of A�A ca/#,
0 2s 24.Pst I�moon calif 2gnp�tpa�o/
�atnom Patz 2.'jotu -l'-s.- Sten ornla 6 ? Vo%9(aat
1111e 2A, g�Udtn9 6 (Y' Co/Id/�9 me z S�a
Ce gids 1d6�Ommt9awetnatlor
e 2� a on t 2�,h18S1 on
abed on th � /
B �i 5,k ® nternaaonal&OSi
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
6. Dormant Permit Program
Development activity in the City of Atascadero was at record levels in 2007 when the
recession hit. Numerous residential subdivision projects were under construction at the
time and many hundreds of building permits were ready to issue when the economy
came to a standstill. By early 2008, the City realized that all of these permits were at
risk of expiring and moved forward proactively with a Dormant Permit Application
Program to extend the life of the permits until the economy recovered. The Dormant
Permit Program amended the Municipal Code to keep project entitlements and building
permits active. The purpose was to allow these projects to quickly be restarted once
the economy recovered.
The City's Dormant Permit Application Program has been revised and extended three
times. The program requires permits to be updated to meet current building code
requirements, but looks in the original fees and plans. Today there is ample evidence
the Dormant Permit Application program has brought substantial benefit to the
community as a number of dormant and bankrupt residential projects have recently
come back to life, including:
• Dove Creek townhouse and cottages
• Las Lomas apartments and single-family residential
• Villas at Montecito townhouses
• Peoples Self Help Housing single-family residential
• Southside Villas condominiums
• Oakhaven townhouses
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
r
w�
J
f
- L
Dove Creek Townhomes under construction in 2013. These permits were kept active under the Dormant
Permit Program.
The Dormant Permit Program is self-funding and actually is a source of revenue, since
outstanding permit fees are collected when the dormant permit is issued. To date
$338,000 in permit fees have been collected on dormant permits.
The current, Phase 4, extension the Dormant Permit Program runs until 12/31/13. Staff
thinks that the program is nearing the end of its usefulness, since the majority of the
permits under the program will be issued by the end of 2013. Staff will bring a report to
Council in the Fall of 2013 to review the status of the Dormant Permit Program and
whether the program should be extended again or allowed to expire.
7. Historic City Hall Return/New Permit Center
The Community Development Department along with the rest of City Hall staff is
planning to move back into Historic City Hall in the Spring of 2013. Relocation of the
entire permitting process, customer service functions and file storage will be a
significant undertaking that will require substantial staff resources to plan for and
implement. It is expected staff productivity and permit processing will be impacted
during the move.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
• -i i i i
00MMINITY
DEVELOPMENT
- PUBLIC WORKS
COMNUNRY
SERVICES
CRY MANAGER
i 0
�r ADMINISTRATIVE
'-� SERVICES
REDEVLOPMENT
- CDwERENCE
7
til
M
i
I
I �
14
1 �
a
1
L
1
A O Q O ! _.
Permit and customer service center in the lower rotunda of
the Historic City Hall.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
8. Public Record Request Improvements
Public records requests for building permit records continue to be a major time
commitment for staff, averaging 10 to 20 staff hours per week. As a result of tougher
lending standards, many residential loans are contingent on providing building permit
records that show all structures on a property were legally permitted. It is routine for
buyers and agents to request complete permitting records on a property at the last
minute to close an escrow. Staff attempts to accommodate these urgent requests, but it
is a challenge since the historic permit files are not digitized. The use of Cal Poly
interns and the time on Fridays when the counter is closed are invaluable in preparing
records requests.
The last 10 years of permits are digitized but older permits are stored in file cabinets or
on aging microfiche. Staff is looking into the possibility of digitizing the microfilm and
microfiche records to speed up the process.
AD
•' .dW W
Staff must search microfilms regularly for permit record requests.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
9. Zoning Code Update
The City's Zoning Code requires regular updating to reflect changing trends in society
and business. Staff is tracking a list of potential code updates that should be
considered in 2013. The following amendments will likely be processed as a
combination of individual amendments and a larger more comprehensive update.
• Front Yard Setbacks flexibility update
• Indoor Recreation Use in the Industrial district.
• Mobile food vendors
• Extended stay hotels
• Cargo containers
• Temporary Events
• Update of land use definitions
E
r
W
ilk
Updating the front setback ordinance would allow structures like this trellis in the front yard
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
10. Walmart/Annex
The Walmart / Annex project General Plan Amendment and EIR were approved by City
Council in June. Walmart is holding off on the preparation of engineering and
architectural plans until the CEQA lawsuit is resolved. Staff and the City Attorney are
working on responding to the lawsuit in preparation for a March hearing. Staff is also
assisting in the marketing of the Annex site and has met with an Arizona commercial
developer about developing the property. Public Works has hired a consultant to begin
work on the Del Rio Road / US 101 interchange improvement design and permits.
46
- r
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
11. Eagle Ranch Specific Plan and Annexation
The Eagle Ranch Specific Plan continues to evolve and progress towards the
Environmental Impact Report. In March of 2012, a joint session of the Planning
Commission and City Council reviewed the Eagle Ranch project. Although the City
Council expressed support for the overall project concept and approach, there were a
number of fiscal and neighborhood compatibility issues that needed to be addressed.
Over the past 9 months, the project applicant has met with various neighborhood
groups numerous times and completely redesigned the project to improve the project's
finances and to enhance compatibility with the surrounding neighborhoods.
November 2012— revised Eagle Ranch site plan
Large lots added
next to existing Atascadero Ave.
neighborhoods I entry redesigned to
minimize traffic
impacts and send
� r traffic to the Santa
Barbara Road / US
101 interchange
1,4 illy
Ile
W
4
41
Project density
reduced from 680
lots to 494 lots r
� Village Center Smallest lot size
relocated to earlier increased to % acre
phase minimum
Conceptual Site Plan `
'lot Tc --cale .tip.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
Significant Changes Since 4-2012
�. <
.,N- EAGLE RANCH
On December 13, 2012, the City hosted a neighborhood workshop to review the latest
project proposal. The meeting was well attended with more than 100 residents showing
up for the presentation and workshop. At the meeting, staff and the applicant presented
the latest project design, explained the changes and provided a summary of the latest
traffic analysis. Following the presentation, four breakout sessions were held to focus
on the following areas:
• Atascadero Ave. / Ortega Rd.
• San Rafael Rd. / San Carlos Rd.
• San Diego Rd. (west) / Tolosa Rd.
• Overall project design issues
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
Each group produced a list of project issues and priorities. Staff has posted those
issues on the City's website and has invited the public to submit additional comments.
The groups identified traffic, neighborhood impacts, trails, access, and compatibility with
existing neighborhoods as key issues.
I .
•
December 13, 2012 Neighborhood Workshop
W
W
speed amend like � :;,,a,.
V increase . internal tur shortcut
ffi �nfrabttucture need = r0 osed
r a.,,.-0 �n access p�perE I p o
krz:!,,_ trail :;rnon �
� sanra ae atascaderoave u. a �
4-, highway
- new service concerned cz west U �`
�+ gas �� povublc • emergency -.• truck ernscn Typei
r. .._, r - maintenance
ti sand1e o �m-ow, maintain W 'impacts
E o g zoning 3 o tau ,character
ct-
water f un.Jr .,nd ' y •-•"• i)pselcmrntxry
public r speeding existing o along, anun,l
neighborhood
l,nu -pu c;ewttii O t S u� ,� roa cera!"r
far. ,-
ft E�'o �'I t`lo os`i roads
school .arxhmus w
3 � �-+ � r natural O
Connection
1
12/13/12 meeting key words
This "Wordle" word cloud, graphically represents the frequency that key words were
raised during the neighborhood workshop.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
The project applicant is now in the process of fine tuning the project plan to incorporate
the latest changes such as a redesigned Atascadero Ave / San Rafael intersection
design. The next steps in the process will be a Design Review Committee meeting on
January 31, 2013 and a joint Planning Commission / City Council meeting on February
26, 2013. The purpose of the February meeting will be for the Council to formally
review the project design, take public testimony, and then give direction on whether to
begin the Environmental Impact Report process. In preparation for this meeting, staff
will be preparing additional information on traffic and fiscal impacts for the City Council's
information.
If the preparation of the Environmental Impact Report is approved, staff would then
begin the process with Michael Brandman and Associates which is currently under
contract. A Notice of Preparation and scoping meeting would need to be prepared in
early spring of 2013. The remainder of the year would focus on the preparation of the
Draft Environmental Impact Report, the Specific Plan and the project's tentative tract
map. All of these tasks will require a significant allocation of planning staff time, which
will be reimbursed by the applicant.
I Ati �J
r
1. i .r.
V � 1N
Jr
r,
1 - �,
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
12. Spring Hill Hotel
The 130 room Spring Hill Hotel conditional use permit amendment and fee deferral
agreement were both approved recently. Staff is currently working with Westar's
engineer on the lot line adjustment. Staff has been contacted by the project architect
regarding the project site plan, but no building plans have been submitted to the City for
review. The building department is prepared to expedite the plan check process once
the plans are submitted to the City.
The Planning Commission conditioned the project to allow for an expanded conference
room space so larger events accommodating up to 500 people could be held. The
applicant has expressed reservations about enlarging the conference room space.
air
icing
El
The 130 room Spring Hill Suite Hotel at the Home Depot Shopping Center.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
13. Housing Tract Restarts
As a result of the Council's successful Dormant Permit Program, many abandoned
residential subdivision developments are coming back to life. Although these projects
are already approved, the new buyers and the current housing market necessitate the
project plans be revised. Planning and building staffs are finding that restarting
residential projects require a significant amount of staff time to assist the new owner
and process changes. Because these permits have already been approved by the City,
much of the staff time is not reimbursed. Currently, the City's Assistant Planner is
spending most of his time working on these dormant project restarts. The following
dormant residential projects are being reactivated:
Project Residential Units
Remaining
Dove Creek: 279 single-family residential units 56 units
Las Lomas: 279 single-family residential and multi- 187 units
family residential units
Southside Villas: 72 multi-family residential units 56 units
Montecito Estates: 32 single-family residential units 16 units
Vintage Homes: 12 single-family residential units 12 units
Oakhaven: 62 attached single-family residential 62 units
units
West Front Village: 32 single-family residential units 27 units
Oak Grove 2: 24 single-family residential units - 24 units
People Self Help Housing
Total 440 units
Revised Oakhaven elevations—approved by Planning Commission on December 18, 2012
N
J`t
- t
�Au I '!
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
14. Housing Element Implementation/2014 Regional Housing Needs
Allocation
In 2013, the City of Atascadero will receive its Regional Housing Needs Allocation
(RHNA) from San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG). According to
SLOCOG staff, the City's allocation of statewide affordable units will be slightly less
than the current allocation. In order to comply with State requirements, the City will
need to update its Housing Element in 2014. One of the steps to receiving approval of
the 2014 Housing Element is to complete the implementation measures required by the
2008 allocation. The City's housing consultant, Lisa Wise Consulting, is currently
working on these tasks. Staff is currently working to bring the following items to the
Planning Commission and City Council before the summer of 2013:
• Updated Affordable Housing Density Bonus ordinance
• SB-2 Emergency Shelter and Transitional Housing site selection and ordinance
• Updated Fair Housing Policy
• Single-Room Occupancy ordinance
Staff and Lisa Wise Consulting have been meeting with ECHO to coordinate on the SB-
2 Emergency Shelter Ordinance. A Citywide, affordable housing, "stakeholder" meeting
will be held in the beginning of 2013 to discuss affordable housing issues.
Funding for a consultant to prepare the 2014 Housing Element update will be needed in
the next budget cycle.
15. Native Tree Planting
The City continues to collect tree mitigation funds for native trees that are removed as
part of development activities. This program is an important part of maintaining the
City's native woodlands and trees that lend Atascadero much of its character. The
program is also an important mitigation program under CEQA that allows development
projects to avoid complicated mitigation programs for tree removals. The mitigation
program was incorporated into the Walmart / Annex EIR and was not challenged in the
subsequent lawsuit.
City staff, in cooperation with the Atascadero Native Tree Association (ANTA), has been
working together for a number of years on native tree replanting projects. These
projects, which are paid for with mitigation funds, have allowed thousands of native
trees to be replanted throughout the community. The project is so successful and
unique, that San Luis Obispo County has funded tree planting in Atascadero to mitigate
tree removals in the County. The following areas have been planted in Atascadero:
• Atascadero Creek at Carmelita
• Heilmann Grove at the Salinas River
• Las Lomas Open Space
• Paloma Creek Park
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
• Stadium Park
• Chico Road Linear Park
• De Anza Horse Arena
• Seedling give-away program
City staff is currently working with Althouse and Meade, a local biologist that specializes
in environmental restoration, to identify the next round of planting sites. One of the sites
they will investigate is the possibility of planting oaks within the US 101 Caltrans right-
of-way. This location would have the dual benefits of regenerating native oak trees and
improving the visual character of the City's 101 gateway.
ATASCADERO NATIVE TREE REGENERATION SITES
ATMLAI*WG i RfFK Rf"RVAT)ON AT A_V.AFIERO T'RFfK RFSFRVATK:N
A•ASCACIERO CREEK RESERVATION NEST ST PORTOLA BRICIA rUPSTREAMI AT PCRiIOIA BROW I[K*MISTRF.AM,
►IRAN IpACNs �` � '� _ •. -- ted• _ `�
ryAuly BAT l.raal 1
M.I?u►. • 1�
Ca1lullw 1141, A ' • I •- �i
Hdilwi�Ra4 Barr
££OAX
�S
�nTrrr,lT,ti�Ro�o.a O'�I.INCS
Ax W
coAA„TA c1,�+4n %F
Tur
... „� rte. "••1.. _^�.{
NrMuo
./� _�•y•DRi~ '^.�rp�y� '1 - \'
vAq�y01y�\TapA mow+- .�
�•V AT�m��+.,a�.�krry��'-�+b�ry�woieNAM�
�••
•-..4 w "� - Tuee Plaritd►ig
r TNT d MANA&V.
I.uAN\IIN1IrR\4r..41r•
1
1
\
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
16. Climate Action Plan
The City of Atascadero has agreed to participate in the San Luis Obispo Air Pollution
Control District's Climate Action Plan (CAP) grant for small cities. The City Council has
appointed the Planning Commission to act as the City's steering committee for the
City's CAP. City staff has been attending meetings and working with APCD staff and
their consultant over the past year on the CAP. In November, APCD issued the CAP
toolbox and held Countywide workshops to discuss the proposed greenhouse gas
reduction measures.
City staff is attending training how to operate the toolbox model and will be scheduling a
workshop with the Planning Commission to formulate a draft version of the City's CAP.
APCD's goal is to have Atascadero complete its CAP before the summer of 2013. Staff
anticipates this will require a significant staff commitment for the first half of 2013.
FIGURE 1: SUMMARY OF ATASCADERO'S
GHG EMISSIONS AND REDUCTION TARGET
180,000 �- Business-as-
UsualForecast
170,000
a —1-2005 Baseline
"
O 160,000
V
i•
L • ♦�q0jo
150.000
E
W •
140,000 •
l7 P�
• ` rrycq �Vq• • •
130,000
O"'a•a AD •• • r''4
120,000 2005 ph'f" y ��+c. �!
N G
1/0
o e �•O�r�'% r w
sa°�eq�nso�•"�a,,,adeo„�y�'� °� y'�c�ya e 441
a>U
i1
wba
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
17. Stormwater Regulations
In September 2012, the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)
adopted its Post-Construction Stormwater Management Requirements. As a part of this
approval, the City of Atascadero will need to modify its existing Municipal Code and
engineering standards to reflect these new regulations passed by the RWQCB. These
new rules will take effect in September 2013 and the City will need to have new
standards in place by this time.
These regulations adopted by the RWQCB will affect all new development and infill
projects that create or replace 2,500 square feet or more of impervious surface. The
City will need to adopt new engineering standards and ordinances that reflect the
following: reduction of stormwater runoff on project sites; treatment of water quality as a
result of stormwater runoff generated by new and infill development; and, retention of
stormwater runoff on-site. The regulations are tiered, so that larger projects will have to
meet all three goals, whereas smaller projects will focus solely on reducing stormwater
runoff on-site.
In addition to these new ordinances and standards, the City will need to submit for
approval of an area of the City known as "Urban Sustainability Area" that will help
reduce some of these new regulations in areas of the City where we want to continue to
encourage infill development such as Downtown and the EI Camino Real Corridor. Staff
will work with our local builders and contractors to inform them of the new regulations
handed down by the RWQCB, as well as standard and ordinance modifications that will
hp takinn nlarP within the gnl i ralPndAr \/Par
tip' ate'
r -
,p
T, s
"V
Storm�'��tcr
anent
prag�
ALJ i
r' AA.y
lot drainage system with bio-swale.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
18. SLOCOG Salinas River Trail Master Plan
Planning staff has been working with SLOCOG and the City of Paso Robles on a Trail
Master Plan project for the Salinas River. The trail would follow the de Anza Historic
trail and ultimately connect Santa Margarita to San Miguel. Staff will continue to provide
assistance to the trail master plan project over the next year.
f.
SLOCOG community workshop— Templeton Community Center, December 2012
Summary of SLOCOG Grant
The Congressionally-authorized Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail runs
approximately 1200 miles from Nogales, Arizona to the San Francisco Bay area and
represents the south to north overland route used by the Anza Expedition to establish
the Spanish presidio at San Francisco. Since the National Parks Service does not own
the land associated with the Anza Trail, the program is administered through
partnerships with federal, state and local governments, non-profit groups, and private
landowners. The vision for the Anza Trail includes a continuous non-motorized
recreation trail for hiking, biking, and horseback riding. Throughout the project area there
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
are numerous gaps in the Anza Trail as well as deficiencies in access and mobility for
the non-motorized traveler.
As a first step for San Luis Obispo County, a Trail Master Plan is needed to define both
feasible short-term and desirable long-term alignments for the trail through the North
County Region. Once completed, the SLO North County Salinas River Corridor Segment
of the Anza Trail Master Plan will serve as a guide so that different partners can
construct individual segments over time and ensure that these pieces will ultimately be
part of a cohesive regional trail system. SLOCOG, as lead agency, will convene a
Steering Committee to oversee development of the Master Plan comprised of Caltrans
District 5, the City of Atascadero, City of Paso Robles, and the County of San Luis
Obispo.
This plan would identify how best to expand the circulation system and enhance modal
choices and connectivity to meet the local, regional, State and federal complete streets
goals and needs. Developing a trail system along the Salinas River Corridor would not
only benefit the recreationalist but the commuter as well. Serving 5 communities within a
35 mile corridor allows for commute travel for work, school and shopping. By providing
non-motorized connections between these communities the existing transportation
system is preserved by reducing the use by single occupant vehicles on the system.
The location of greatest concern within the project area is the distance between the City
of Atascadero and the Community of Templeton. While this segment is only a 112 mile
between communities, it is the only one that is connected by the US 101 only. There is
no off highway connection between these communities and a cyclist must either use the
freeway or travel six miles east to make the connection. Implementation of this plan
would solve the problem of this connection thereby increasing the safety of the users of
the system.
19. Affordable Housing Policy
In 2003, the City of Atascadero adopted a local inclusionary, Affordable Housing Policy.
The policy required that all residential projects seeking a legislative entitlement approval
from the City Council (general plan amendment, zone change or planned development)
would be required to provide 20% of the units as affordable units. Depending on the
density and size of the project, there were different affordability rates for the units and
different requirements related to whether the units had to be constructed within the
project. Projects that needed only a conditional use permit, like an apartment complex
or just a tentative tract map were exempt from the affordable policy.
Prior to the recession, the policy worked well and produced 110 deed restricted
affordable units within the City of Atascadero. However, since the recession, declining
home values and foreclosures have created challenges for staff to handle as units are
resold. In addition, many developers including Eagle Ranch have claimed that the
Affordable Housing Policy no longer makes sense and is discouraging the production of
housing due to increased costs.
Staff is looking for Council direction on the future of the Affordable Housing Policy.
Adoption of the original policy required a significant amount of staff and City Council
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
effort to produce. Amending the current policy would be time consuming and would
likely require the assistance of an outside consultant.
2003 City Council Inclusionary Housing Policy
Adopted by City Council June 24,2003
Amended by City Council November 25, 2003
Inclusionary Section Interim Policy
A. Project Requirements a) All residential projects that require legislative approval are
subject to the inclusionary requirement as follows
a Projects of 1.10 units pay in-lieu fee or build units
b Projects of 11 or more units must build units or
receive a Council approval to pay in-lieu fees
B. Percent Affordable 1 The percentage of units within a project that must be
affordable shall be 20%.
2 The distribution of affordable units in single family land use
areas shall be as follows
a 100%Moderate
3. The distribution of affordable units in multi-family and mixed
use commercial land use areas shall be as follows.
a 20%Very Low Income
b 37%Low Income
c 43%Moderate
4. In-lieu fees shall be collected for all fractional units up to 0 499
units,fractional units of 0 50 and greater shall be counted as
1 0 units.
5 All inclusionary units shall be deed restricted for a period of 30
years.
C. Exceptions 1. Projects that do not require a legislative approval from the City
shall not be subject in the interim policy
2 Projects that qualify for the State density bonus are exempt
form additional inclusionary housing requirements
3 Second units are exempt from the inclusionary requirement
D. Affordable Housing 1 The exterior design and quality standards for affordable units
Standards shall be comparable to those of market rate units Affordable
units may be of a smaller size and utilize less expensive
interior finishes
2. Affordable units shall be distributed throughout a project site
and not concentrated in one location
3. Inclusionary units shall be built concurrently with market rate
units. A construction timeline shall be approved by the City
Council prior to construction
E. In-Lieu Fees 1 In-lieu fees for units and fractions of units shall be based on
5 00°io of the construction valuation of the market rate unit
F. Alternatives 1 The developer may request and the City Council may approve
any of the following alternatives to on-site construction or
payment of in-lieu fees for inclusionary units:
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 01/08/13
CONCLUSION:
These projects and policy areas represent significant efforts facing Atascadero in the
2013-15 period. These issues will be discussed at the Council strategic planning
workshop. The purpose of this report is to provide the Council information and
background in preparation for those discussions.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 01/08/13
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — Community Development Department
Eagle Ranch Specific Plan
EIR Consultant Contract
Amendment for Additional Preliminary Studies
RECOMMENDATION:
Council authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute change orders with Michael
Brandman and Associates (MBA) for the Eagle Ranch Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
Constraints Analysis in order to include additional preliminary studies and consultant time.
The total cost of the original contract, contract amendments and change orders shall not
exceed $300,000 for Phase 1 prior to beginning the official EIR process.
DISCUSSION:
Background: In 2010, the Eagle Ranch project applicant requested the processing of the
Eagle Ranch EIR simultaneously with the development of the Specific Plan. This
concurrent processing was authorized by the City Council in order to incorporate the EIR
analysis and recommendations in the early phases of the project design. Often, EIRs are
processed after a project has been completely designed, leading to discovery of issues late
in the process which may require major redesign of the project, or a series of mitigation
measures applied to "fix" the projects' shortcomings. The concurrent Specific Plan / EIR
approach for Eagle Ranch was developed in order to create a proactive, effective, and
efficient approach to identifying environmental issues before a final project design is
completed.
In 2010, the City issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and advertised Statewide for a
qualified consultant to prepare an EIR for the Eagle Ranch Specific Plan. Upon interviewing
several firms, Michael Brandman and Associates (MBA) was selected as the most qualified
consultant based on their work experience, references and staff assigned to the project. At
a meeting on January 11, 2011, the City Council authorized the City Manager to negotiate
and execute a contract with MBA for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for
the Eagle Ranch Specific Plan.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 01/08/13
In order to ensure compliance with CEQA regulations, the City (not the applicant) has
contracted directly with the environmental consultant to complete the EIR Constraints
Analysis. The City directly manages the environmental consultant and controls the scope of
work. However, the cost of preparing the EIR and Specific Plan is the full responsibility of
the applicant. The entire EIR consultant contract is reimbursed to the City by the project
applicant with a 10% City administration fee to cover any overhead costs to the City.
Consistent with Council authorization, the City Manager negotiated a multiphase EIR
contract in April 2011 (refer to Attachment 2, MBA's Preliminary Scope of Work). The
contract is scoped with three phases:
(1) Phase 1: Technical Background Data Collection
(2) Phase 2: Preliminary Analysis of Conceptual Land Use Diagram
(3) Environmental Impact Report.
The total cost of all three phases was estimated at $641,520. The contract for the Phase 1
& 2 "Preliminary Constraints Analysis" was estimated to cost $113,200. The Preliminary
Constraints Analysis included site surveys by biological and archeological consultants,
preliminary review of traffic impacts at the interchanges, and a preliminary Fiscal Impact
Analysis. The City authorized $113,200 to MBA for the Phase 1 & 2 Constraint Analysis,
and decided the Phase 3 contract would be executed separately once the project
description and extent of environmental constraints was determined.
Analysis: As a result of traffic concerns raised by neighborhood groups, the concerns of
local Native American tribes to have more active role in the archaeological consultation
process, and the City's request for additional fiscal analysis, the Phase 1 & 2 scope of work
exceeded the original $113,200 contract amount. Several change orders have been
processed to add the following additional items to the current EIR Constraints Analysis
contract with MBA:
• MBA contracted with both the Northern Chumash Tribal Council and the Salinan
Tribe to have them present during archeological surveys and consult regarding
findings & potential building areas
• Expanded study area to consider additional potential building areas plus road and
interchange improvement areas (additional archeological and biological surveys)
• Extended Phase 1 Archaeological studies for additional analysis of specific findings
• Additional Traffic Analysis to study local offsite roads
• Atascadero Ave. intersection/roundabout study for traffic calming & directing trips
south to Santa Barbara interchange
• The additional traffic analysis coordinated with RCS to determine fair share cost
analysis for the future interchange improvements
• Traffic Consultant attendance at meetings and neighborhood workshop
• Update traffic analysis report based on 2012 updated project description
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 01/08/13
• David Taussig & Associates, Inc. ongoing discussions on Fiscal Analysis and 2012
updates to report to reflect redesign of project and County Tax Share negotiations
Most of these added items would have been studied later during the official EIR process,
however, the applicant and the City requested this information earlier in order to be able to
respond to community concerns early in the process. The early EIR review, ongoing
design, response and redesign of the project have helped to create a largely self-mitigating
plan which incorporates the observations, technical information, and recommendations of
independent environmental professionals as part of the basic project design and Specific
Plan.
Since the Constraints Analysis costs have gone above the original estimated $113,200, staff
felt it was necessary to update the Council on the EIR budget and Constraints Analysis
status, and request approval of the amended contract for the additional studies. Based on
the additional studies and services needed, staff is estimating that the costs for the Phase 1
& 2 Constraints Analysis, will be around $300,000. Staff is requesting that Council
authorize the City Manager to execute change orders as necessary up to a total contract
amount (contract, contract amendments and change orders) of $300,000 in order complete
Phases 1 & 2. This will allow sufficient funding to cover the additional analyses performed
to date, as well as some additional studies and consultation, if needed in upcoming weeks
or months prior to beginning the formal EIR. In accordance with the City's fee schedule, all
costs of the contract are paid for by the Eagle Ranch.
The proposed MBA EIR contract amendment is for the additional studies to be included in
the Phase 1 & 2 EIR Constraints Analysis only. When a final project description is ready,
Council will review the proposed project at a noticed public hearing prior to authorizing the
formal EIR process to begin. Staff and the applicant hope to bring the updated project
design and proposed project description to City Council as soon as February 2013 in order
to begin the formal EIR later this year.
An updated Phase 3 EIR contract will be brought to the City Council for approval prior to
beginning work on the EIR.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact of the EIR process on the City will be revenue neutral. The City's cost
recovery fees require that planning staff time is covered for the preparation of the Specific
Plan and EIR. The entire EIR consultant contract budget is reimbursed to the City by the
project applicant with a 10% City administration fee to cover any overhead costs to the City.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Accounting Spreadsheets
2. MBA Scope of Work (March 22,2011)
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 1
Attachment 1: Accounting Spreadsheets
MBA EIR Phase 1 Constraints Analysis Contracts
Date +10%City
Description Requested Consultant Fee Overhead Applicant to pay
Constraints Analysis (Original) 4/15/2011 $113,200.00 $11,320.00 $124,520.00
Change Order: Expanded study area, 7/1/2011 $82,052.00 $8,205.20 $90,257.20
added archeology areas, Native American
participation
Change Order: Added 37 acre area, 10/24/2011 $41,485.00 $4,148.50 $45,633.50
extended Phase 1 archaeological
investigation, additional traffic analysis
Change Order: W-Trans Atascadero Ave 10/29/2012 $14,550.00 $1,455.00 $16,005.00
study, interchange cost share
coordination, & updated traffic report
Change Order: W-Trans attendance at 1/8/2013 $2,275.00 $227.50 $2,502.50
12/13/12 neighborhood workshop
Totals $253,562.00 $25,356.20 $278,918.20
Consultant Fee 10%City Applicant to pay
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
Attachment 2: MBA Scope of Work(March 22, 2011)
Eagle Ranch Specific Plan and Annexation-Environmental Services
PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF WORK: MARCH 22,2011
Preliminary Scope of Work
This preliminary scope of work outlines Michael Brandman Associates'(MBA's)proposed overall
involvement in the Eagle Ranch Specific Plan process through certification of the Final Environmental
Impact Report(EIR). Due to the complexity of the project,only Phases 1 and 2 are described with a high
degree of specificity_Details associated with Phase 3 will be provided following completion of Phases 1
and 2_
Also included is:he sccpe of work for the Public Facilities Financing Plan(PFFD)that will be prepared by
David Tauss g& Assccates under contract to MBk This work product while not intended for inclusion in
the EIR.grill support the spe:if c plan.
PHASE 1:Technical Background Data Collection andAnalysis
The purpose of this Phase is to 1)provide the MBA team with a thorough understanding of the project site
environmental opportunities and constraints and previously prepared studies and 2)identify additional
technical studies that will be required in order to assist the design team(i-e.,RRM Design Group)in the
formulation of the specific plan and for MBA's use in preparing of the EIR_
Task 1: Project Kick-off Meeting and Site Visit
The MBA team will participate in a tour of the project site,with special attention devoted to areas
potentially proposed for development,including roadway,utility alignments,and other infrastructure
improvements. We would recommend that the tour be led by the property owner,design team.and
include various City staff.
This task will also include a meeting involving RRM,City staff,and the MBA project team. The purpose for
this meeting is to receive a presentation on the conceptual land use plan,in addition to obtaining and
reviewing all of the site studies.constraints mapping slope analysis,etc.and other relevant reference
materials previously prepared by RRM and the applicant team. This will help to ensure the MBA project
team is using the appropriate base date(i-e.,maps and databases)and avoid duplication in subsequent
studies.
Task 2: Peer Review of Technical Studies
-I-i=MEA team will conduct a peer review of all technical studies completed to date.The fo'lowing
t>ch n cal studies have been prepared by the project proponent:
■ Biological Constraints Map,Morro Group,8/19/05
■ Biological Constraints Report,Morro Group,1/18/06
■ Cultural Landscape Map,Authentic Resources Team,undated
• Cultural Landscape Report,Authentic Resources Team.undated
■ Heritage Study,Vol.1,Thor Conway,10/7/05
• Heritage Study.Vol.2,Thor Conway,10/7/05
• Engineering Geology&Preliminary Geotechnical Planning Study,Kleinfelder.8,/25,.%05
1
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
Eagle Ranch Specific Plan and Annexation-Environmental Services
PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF WORK MARCH 22,20U
The MBA team will conduct peer reviews of these studies and determine either that they are adequate or
that additional investigation and analysis are warranted.Following are our initial observations regarding
the cultural and biological resources reports_
Biological Constraints Map/Report-Initial Observations. One of MBA's senior biologists co-ducted a
cursory review o`the mapjrepert prepared by Ivloro Group. Overall.R is very detailed and well drafted
study. That said,there are a few issues of particular mention at this point More specifically,in order to
produce an adequate environmental document,the entire"project site'should be evaluated and mapped.
In addition.the document is very general in terms of potential for sensitive species. A more detailed
habitat assessment is required to identify suitable habitat areas for the sensitive plant and wildlife species
that could potentially within the project site.The document makes a good case for conducting surveys,but
does not identify the appropriate locations for them to occur. With a more detailed habitat assessment,
any required protocol surveys can be narrowed to focus only within areas of suitable habitat. There are
also a few inconsistencies with regard to survey routes;three surveys were conducted over a two-year
period,but there is no identification on the maps provided in the document as to where they occurred.
We also note that the biological constraints report contains no analysis of existing oak trees,which will
need to be conducted by MBA's arborist in accordance with City requirements.
Colturel Rasorrees Reports-Initial Observations. One of MBA's senior cultural resource specialists
conducted a cursory review o`the reperts prepared by Authentic Resources Team and Thor Conway. The
Heritage Study Report(Volumes 1 and 2)appears to be prel-ii-ary in nature.It should also be noted that
these reports are somewhat dated and may need to be updated to consider the most current project site
and development area_ Of particular note.the report provides very few evaluations of the sites that have
been identified and recorded.which is required to determine their significance in the context of the
California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA).
The Guttural Landscape Report(undated)seems to be more recent and is in a more finished state. That
said,this report would provide an adequate foundation document for the EIR. Once impact areas are fully
determined.the prehistoric sites noted in the report would need to be evaluated following the outline
provided therein for the purposes of making the appropriate significance finding in the EIR. Unlike the
Heritage Study Report,this document evaluates resources from both a CEQA and Section 106 level,which
would be beneficial if regulatory permits are required from the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers.
Neither studies contain any reference to Native American consultation. As noted in earlier meetings and
discussions,such consultation is very critical,given the intended involvement of local Chumash and
Salman groups in this project- A thorough Native American consultation should occur as part of this and
ongoing phases of the project.
Finally.the Cultural Landscape Report recommends a paleontological investigation,which we agree should
be conducted by MBA in accordance with CEQA.
Deliverable:Memorandum describing results o`peer revietos.
Phase 2:Preliminary Analysis of Conceptual land Use Diagram
The purpose of this Phase is to conduct a preliminary analysis of the conceptual land use plan prepared by
the design team. This important phase of the work program is where the design team and MBA will work
collaboratively and iteratively to achieve the highest possible degree of`self mitigation"in the specific pla-
land use diagram.
i
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
Eagle Ranch Specific Plan and Annexation-Environmental Services
PRELIMINARY&COPE OF WORK. MARCH 22,2011
Task 1:Preliminary Environmental Constraints Analysis/Interchange Traffic
Sensitivity Analysis/Fiscal Impact Analysis
The MBA team will conduct a thorough preliminary analysis of the conceptual land-use diagram in order to
identify any potential environmental,traffic,or fiscal impacts that,through either conceptual plan re-
design or policy implementation,could result in mitigation of impacts. Particular attention will be given to
agricultural resources,biological resources,cultural resources,flooding/hydrology,slopes,traffic,
wildlife/emergency access,and fiscal impacts.as noted below. MBA will utilize Geographic Information
Systems in the preparation of necessary maps and exhibits.
Agricultural Suitability Analysis.MBA will conduct a preliminary analysis of the project site in order to
ident y areas suitaole fcr crop production,including but not limited to wine grapes.
Agricultural Suitability Subtask 1.This task will involve the collection of Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program(FMMP)maps and summarization of acreage of FMMP lands within the project area.
Agricultural Suitability Subtask 2.MBA will determine which parcels,if any,are under Williamson Act
contracts.We will determine the contract status of any parcels under Williamson Act
Agricultural Suitability Subtask 3.MBA will use the Agricultural LSSA Model to determine the quality of land
for agricultural uses(this takes into account irrigation and soil types',-Maps that will be produced include a
soil map and a zone of influence map and include identification of areas suitable for agricultural
resources.
Biological constraints Analysis.MBA will examine the entire Ranch Area tc evaluate the applicability of
the genera.plan:com^iunity nap contained within the 2006 Morro Group Report MBA will conduct a
more detailed habitat assessment to identify the suitable habitat areas for the sensitive plant and wildlife
species that potentially occur within the project site in order to corroborate the findings from the Morro
Group conducted in 2006. On a separate note,these surveys will also be utilized in preparing the
biological resource assessment for the EIR. Additionally,as mentioned previously,this effort would also
allow the focused identification of suitable habitat areas(i.e.,species with a moderate to high potential for
occurrence)for required protocol surveys. Upon completion of the aforementioned tasks,MBA can provide
input with regard to sensitive biological resources and potential areas of avoidance. This evaluation will
allow for any necessary refinements to the Conceptual Land Use Plan in an effort to reduce biological
impacts and assist in the selection of easily developable areas.
Cultural Resources Constraints Analysis.A critical component of identifying potential cultural resources
constraints s the preparation cf an ove,ay map with the survey areas included in the Heritage Study of
October 2005. This will allow us to identify the reed for additional surveying based on the proposed
development in the Conceptual Land Use Plan dated July 2010. A second overlay with all previously
identified cultural resources from the Heritage Study,data from a new Cultural Resources Records Search.
and information from the Authentic Resources Team Report(undated but with reference to a 2008
investigation)would also be useful for comparison with the existing Conceptual Land Use Plan. The goal of
this overlay is to identify known cultural resources that could be directly or indirectly impacted by
development of the property. Based on this information,an attempt could be made to avoid a particular
cultural resource site. For those sites that were chosen not to be avoided further,Phase 2 testing may be
warranted to determine a site's significance_ Followingthese studies,recommendations for refinements
to the Conceptual Land Use Plan could be made based on cultural resources constraints in conjunction
with other environmental considerations. A more detailed overview of the constraints analysis is provided
below.
19RI
3
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
Eagle Ranch Specific Plan and Annexation-Environmental Services
PRELIMINARY&COPE OF WORK: MARCH 22,2011
MBA will retain Albion Environmental to assist MBA,particularly as it relates to Native American
consuttation,,iliaison and the overall Amassment of cultural resources.Under contract to MBA,Albion
Environmental,Inc.will:
• Review existing data for coverage and comparison with current project plans;
■ Conduct sample and ground-truthing surveys to determine the accuracy of existing surveys;
• Conduct limited additional archaeological surveys of proposed development areas not previously
investigated:and.
• Consult with Native American representatives to integrate concerns and discriminate resou'ce
findings_
It is understood that the constraints analysis should produce data that will be viable for later phases of
planning and environmental review(e.g.,CEQA,NEPA.NHPA.SB 18).
Cultural Resources Subtask i Albion will meet with MBA and project stakeholders to review current
project plans and methodologies for the constraints analys.s.
Assumption:One on-site meeting with Albion and sta.Keholders.
Cultural Resources Subtask 2.Albion will:
• Review the existing report(Heritage Discoveries,Inc.,2005)to extract and digitize site location
and site type data;
• Review data and proposed conservation plans from the historic landscape report;
• Review soils and geological maps;
■ Incorperate existing survey and soils and geological information into project GIS layers;
• Compare existing archaeological survey with project plans;
■ Determine areas that require additional survey;and,
• Identify areas sensitive for buried resources that may require extended survey during later phases
of resource identification_
Assumptions:
1. Resource data from the existing survey are available as hardcopy only,therefore Albion will
digitize site locations from existing site records.
2. MBA will provide GIS lavers depicting proposed development
Cultural Resources Subtask 3.Albion will conduct ground-truthing survey of selected areas within the
areas of proposed development that were previously surveyed.New survey data will be used to assess the
accuracy of the previous survey(Heritage Discoveries,Inc.,2005).
Assumption:Ground•truthingsurvevs will cover 70 acres(-20%of original survey).
Cultural Resouroas Subtask 4.Albion will conduct intensive archaeological survey of areas of proposed
development that have not been surveyed.
330
4
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
Eagle Ranch Specific Plan and Aonciation-Environmental Senices
PRELIMINARY BCOPE OF WORK: MARCH 22,2011
The overall goals of the archaeological portion of the investigation are to identify resources.assist the
applicant in avoiding impacts to resources,or if necessary,assist the applicant in mitigation through
archaeological evaluation and data recovery.Please note that the archaeological surveys proposed in this
phase of the investigation are sample surveys only,initiated to determine if the previous survey is accurate
and reliable for project planning and CEQA purposes,and to assess the potential for resources on
previously unsurveyed parcels.These sample surveys are likely to result in recommendations for more
intensive surveys of unsurveyed portions of the project area that may be impacted_It is also possible that
the existing survey is inadequate and resurvey of portions of the project area will be recommended. The
initial recommendations of 300 additional acres of surveying are a result of a cursory review the existing
reference materials and the cultural resources teams'knowledge of the project area. However,these
recommendations will be finalized after the sample surveys are completed. Note,the present scope does
not address any possible archaeological evaluation or data recovery.
Assumption:New archaeological survey will cover no more than 300 acres
Cultural Resources Subtask 6.Albion will establish and maintain a consultation relationship with
representatives of the Northern Chumash Tribal Council and the Salinan Tribe.We will meet with these
representatives to describe and discuss the constraints analysis,provide a summary of existing data,and
relate findings from new archaeological inventory.
Assumptions:
1. Consultation will be with these representatives only,and not with other groups of Chumash or
Salinan.
2. Four onsite or local area meetings will be required,with addition time allocated to
correspondence between meetings.
3. Consultation under S8-18 will occur during later phases of planning,and may include additional
Chumash and Salinan tribal representatives.Albion will assist in that effort as needed under a
separate scope ofservicea.
Cultural Resources Subtask 6.Albion will report findings in regular progress reports,a constraints
memorandum,and a summary cultural resources survey report
Note,the survey report,which will be utilized for the purposes of preparing the EIR(costs provided under
Phase III of this attachment),will contain background research,a summary of previous studies,current
survey methods and findings,and importantly,recommendations for additional studies that may be
required for completing CEQA/NEPA review(i.e.,additional survey or Phase II testing,archaeological
evaluation,mitigation measures,development of treatment plan).Information contained in the cultural
resources survey report will be used address impacts to cultural resources required during the CEQA
review process.
Flood Zone/Hydrology Analysis.MBA will research relevant data sources,particularly FEMA maps.for
information concern ng the presence of 10-and 100-year flood zones in areas proposed for development
and infrastructure improvements.MBA will produce a map that depicts areas subject to potential flooding
and other hydrologic issues those pose potential constraints to development
Slope Analysis.MBA will research relevant data sources for existing slope stability information and will
loduce�ope map of the site where development,including infrastructure,is proposed. In relation to
5
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
Eagle Ranch Specific Plan and Annexation-Environmental Services
PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF WORK MARCH 22,20U
potential constraints(i.e.,landslides,etc.),MBA will graphically delineate those portions of the site that
may be unsuitable for development
Traffic SeasHivity Analysis.As a subtask under contract to MBA,W-Trans will calculate potential trip
generation and distribution in order to calculate the potential traffic impact of the project on the Santa
Barbara Road/U.S.101 interchange and primary access roadways. W-Trans will discuss the results of this
preliminary analysis with Cattrans. The purpose of this preliminary traffic analysis and consultation is to
determine early in the design process what project-related traffic volume would trigger the need for
reconstruction of the interchange or expansion of primary roadways.
Traffic Subtask 1.Existing traffic volumes for the study area will be collected from past studies and new
sample counts at up to six locations. The study periods for the traffic study will include the weekday a.m.
and p.m.peak hours. The study area will include the Santa Barbara Road,/US 101 interchange.the Santa
Rosa Road/US 101 interchange,and primary access roads including Atascadero Avenue,San Gabriel
Road.Santa Barbara Road and Santa Rosa Road.
Traffic Subtask 2.Existing roadway and intersection Levels of Service for the study area will be determined
using the new traffic volumes.
Traffic Subtask 3.Using output from the SLOCOG traffic model,future building 2035 traffic volumes will be
determined for the study area and LOS conditions determined.
Traffic Subtask 4.Based on a description provided,the project vehicle trip generation and distribution will
be estimated in order to determine project traffic volume increases in the study area. The impacts to
intersection and roadway LOS will be determined under Existing plus Project and Future plus Project
conditions.
Traffic Subtask 5.A constraints analysis will be conducted to determine the ability of the study area to
accommodate the additional project traffic. This constraints analysis will be conducted for the study area
with 1)existing geometric road facilities and 2)with City Capital Improvement projects(which may be
unfunded). These CIP projects will at least include the roundabout intersections at the Santa Barbara
Road interchange which were established in the US 101 Interchange Study.2008. For scenarios which do
not accommodate the project traffic,the maximum acceptable level of project traffic will be determined.
The maximum threshold will be presented as a vanable formula which the project applicants can use to
determine the combined amount of residential and commercial acreage to develop.
Wlldfire/Emergency ConnectMty Ana"hii.MBA will conduct a preliminary analysis of potential wildland
fre hazare ano po nts of connection for emergency vehicle access(i.e.,firefighting equipment)and
emergency evacuation.The potential for site development to constrain existing emergency connectivity for
points beyond the project site will also be assessed-
Wildfire/Emergency Connectivity Analysis Subtask 1.MEA will research relevant data for existing wildland
fire hazard infcrmaton.
Wldfire/Emergency Con nectivity Ana"is Subtask 2. N'SA w•II research CalFire maps regardi-g existing
fL.el load and f re hazards.
Wildfire/Emergency Connectivity Analysis Subtask 3.In order to it strate the wildland urban interface,
N'BA w II map high risk areas where t,e edge o`urban areas would oe located adjacent to open areas that
may be sub ec:-c f re hazards-
6
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
Eagle Ranch Specific Plan and Annemtion-Environmental Services
PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF WORK MARCH 22,2011
Wildfire/Emergency Connectivity Analysis Subtask 4.MBA will consult with local Fire and Police personnel
regarding emergency access and the prel-i nary layout of the proposed transportation network.
Fiscal Impact Analysis..As a subtask under contract to MBA David Taussig and Associates(DTA)will
p,epare a Fiscal Impact Assessment(FIA)that assessesthe potential fiscal impact the preferred plan and
plan alternatives would have on the City's General Fund,as described below.DTA will prepare tables
identifying applicable fiscal impacts and a two-page summary of the FIA's conclusions.
In preparing the FIA,DTA will mainly utilize the Multiplier Methodology-emphasizing average City
revenues and expenditures-to evaluate the fiscal impacts of the Project's proposed development on the
City's General Fund. Under this fiscal analysis approach,DTA will thoroughly review the City's current
annual operating budget to determine the projected revenues associated with the buildout of the Project,
as well as the projected costs associated with the provision of municipal services to the future
residents/employees of the Project To a lesser extent,DTA will utilize the Case Study Methodology-
emphasizing marginal expenditures and revenues-to determine certain projected revenues and costs
associated with the buildout population of the Project,such as propertytaxes,sales taxes,and public
infrastructure maintenance costs.
FW Subtask L Background Project and Fiscal Research.This Task involves identifying selected fiscal
parameters relevant to the Project;collecting Project land-use alternatives and public infrastructure data,
such as lane miles of public roads and acres of landscaped areas;and obtaining material required for the
FLA from the City,such as their current annual operating budget.Specifically,DTA would conduct the
following activities under this task
■ Review proposed Project land-use alternatives by land-use type.including gross and net acres.
unit size,floor-area ratio,building square footage.etc.;:11
• Review projected market prices and,/or project valuation for each Project land-use alternative,by
land-use type;:a
• Review any unique public improvements associated with the proposed land-use designations of
the Project,including major backbone roads,park and open space acreage,recreational activity
areas,etc.;(1)
• Determine demographic characteristics of each land-use alternative by land-use type,including
population per household/facility and employment genera:io-by each non-residential land-use
type(if applicable):
• Obtain and identify breakdown of the one percent(1'%)general property tax levy(from the County
of San Luis Obispo Auditor-Controller),by tax rate area,in which the Project is currently located.
FLA Subtask 2.Fiscal Revenue Analysis.DTA will generally employ the Case Study Methodolo&to project
certain applicable City revenues resulting from the Project's residents,such as certain types of sa es and
property taxes_ Specifically,DTA will calculate annual recurring property tax revenues to the City based on
the tax rate areas)in which the Project is located.
Where applicable,DTA will employ the Multiplier Methodology to calculate other municipal revenues,such
as motor vehicle license fees,gas taxes,fines and forfeitures,and state subventions. Under this
methodology,DTA will conduct a thorough analysis of the City's current annual operating budget for each
applicable revenue category.
Tc he Y"i ed rc J_a b;r:e C:¢and or other Project cowuhm"-.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
Eagle Ranch Specific Plan and Annexation-Environmental Services
PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF WORK: MARCH 22,2011
FIA Subtask 3.Fiscal Expenditure Analysis.DTA will largely employ the Multiplier Methodology in the FIA to
calculate applicable City costs related to the Project land-use alternatives. This task includes a thorough
analysis of the City's current annual operating budget,as well as other relevant City documents(i.e.,
service area studies prepared by various City departments),for application to the FIA for the Project-
Furthermore.
rojectFurthermore.DTA will utilize the Case Study Methodology to identify public infrastructure maintenance
requirements for the Project. utilizing the public infrastructure data collected under Subtask 1.DTA will
quant the proposed infrastructure maintenance costs for the Project utilizing comparable cost
informatio^from DTA's municipal cost database and/or information provided by City staff.
FLA Subtask 4.Analysis of Project Fiscal Impacts
4.1.Projection of Annual Recurring City Revenues and Expenditures.Based on the review and findings of
Subtases 1-3,this task involves an analysis and estimation of the Project's fiscal impact on the City
General Fund under each specific land-use alternative. Specifically,DTA will project the total annual
recurring revenues to the City that would result from the Project's buildout and estimate the recurring
fiscal costs for the provision of public services and operation/maintenance of public facilities.
4.2.Projection of Net Fiscal Impact to the City General Fund.The FIA will include an evaluation of the fiscal
balance of the Project analyzing the projected overall surplus/deficit that the Project will create on the City
General Fund at buildout under each land-use alternative. If DTA projects a net annual shortfall for any of
the Project land-use alternatives,DTA shall provide a succinct description of various public financing
measures that may be undertaken by the City to mitigate arry fiscal imbalance.
Dellverab!e:Mer-orandums describing results of preliminary constraints analysis.
Task 2: Public Outreach - Review of Conceptual Land Use Diagram and Potential
Impacts(Neighborhood Meetings)
In th s task two neighborhood meetings(i.e.,public workshops)are proposed that would involve the design
team in presenting the conceptual land-use plan and the MBA team in describing environmental resources
of the site and the results of the preliminary constraints analysis. Comments made by attendees would be
noted and could affect the assessment or resources and/or the conceptual plan design.
Deliverable:Memorandums describing results of public outreach meetings.
Phase 3:Enuironmemal Impact Report
A detailed description of the tasks and associated fee for this Phase will be determined following
completion of Phases 1 and 2. A not-to-exceed cost estimate is provided.
The purpose of this phase is to produce a full-scope,project-level environmental impact report that is fully
complaint with CEQA,relevant case law.and City specifications,and which is legally defensible. Following
is a skeletal framework for the scope of work. This framework will be further developed and additional
details provided following the completion of the preceding Phases.
Task 1:Prepare Project Description
Based on materials provided by the design team,as well as MBA's knowledge of the site and proposed
project acquired through completion of Phases 1 and 2,MBA will prepare a detailed project description
1111
8
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
Eagle Ranch Specific Plan and Annexation-Environmental Services
PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF WORK: MARCH 22,20U
suitable for inclusion in the Notice of Preparation. This narrative.accompanied by graphic exhibits,would
also be the foundation for the expanded project description in the EIR.
Task 2:Notice of Preparation and Environmental Scoping Process
MBA will prepare the Notice of Preparation(NOP)for the EIR. Since a full-scope EIR is anticipated.no
Initial Study will be prepared_ MBA will coordinate with City staff to conduct scoping meetings and will be
responsible for collecting and compiling all responses to the NOP. Two scoping meetings are
recommended,one for public agencies and one for the general public and private organizations.
Task 3:Additional Technical Studies
Based on completion of Tasks 1 and 2 in Phase 1,the purpose of this task is to prepare new and/or
supplement existing technical studies or analysis required to guide the formulation of the specific plan and
supportthe EIR. With the exception of the infrastructure studies to be performed by the applicant,
additional technical studies required will be completed by the MBA team.Generally,this work effort falls
into the following categories:
1) Redo or augmentation of previously prepared studies-This could be warranted as a result of one
or more of the following circumstances:a)Changes in regulatory environment,b)Changes in site
conditions,and c)Inadequacy of earlier analyses.
2) Conduct new studies-At a minimum,the following new studies will be needed:a)Oak tree.b)
Surface hydrology and water quality,c)Traffic,d)Air quality.e)Greenhouse gases.f)Noise,and g)
Phase 1 Environmental Ste Assessment(hazards analysis).
Task 4:Administrative Draft EIR
MBA will prepare the Adminstra:ive Daft EIR and submit copies to the City for review,which will include
the following sections:
• Project Description
• Cumulative Projects Identification
• Effects Found to be Not Significant
• Thresholds of Significance
■ Effects Ident:`ied as Potentially Significant
■ Aesthetics,Light.and Glare-if analysis of photo-simulations is required.MBA assumes that these
exhibits will be provided by RRM.
• Air Quality
• Biological Resources-The site is heavily forested i0th oaks.This section will include an analysis
of potential impacts on oak trees.Depending upon the results of the constraints analysis and the
areas of potential tree impact,MBA will coordinate with the City/applicant on detailed approach
to oak tree study.
• Cultural Resources -Native American resources related to two tribes may be present.Based on
the results of the constraints analysis and preliminary consultations with the tribal
representatives,MBA will retain Albion Environmental,a local Native American specialist,to
assist MBA in the overall analysis of cultural resources.
• Geology,Soils.and Seismicity-RRM will update geotechnical studies.as cecessary.
•,_„ nhouse Gas Emissions
1=1
9
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
Eagle Ranch Specific Plan and Annexation-Environmental Services
PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF WORK: MARCH 22,2011
■ Hazards and Hazardous Materials-This will be based on a Phase 1 ESA that wiii be prepared by
MBA.
■ Hydrology and Water Quality-RRM will provide storm drainage and.rater quality studies and
plans.
• Land Use and Planning
■ Noise
• Population/Employment/Housing
■ Public Services,Utilities and Services-This section will incorporate the public facility and smote
impact analysis prepared by David Taussig and Associates.
• Transportation-This section will incorporate the transportation analysis prepared by VI-Trans.
■ Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
• Growth-Inducing Impacts
' '%
A te•natives to the Proposed Project
Task 5: Draft EIR
IVBA n 11 respond to comments on the Administrative Draft EIR provided by City. 'Ne will complete
necessa y revisions,and publish the Draft EIR for public review. Once the document is deemed
acceptable for public distribution,MBA will take responsibility for distribution of the Draft EIR.
Task 6:Administrative Final EIR
NIBA will preoa-e.v•:_e- esponses to comments received on the Draft EIR that raise environmental issues
a-d suom;then-`or City staff review after the close of the public comment period. The responses to
comments will be prepared based upon the CEQA Guidelines and the Citys environmental review and
compliance procedures.
Task 7:Final EIR
MBA n II re';ise the'%ritten responsesto cc n rents oased upon ccmrrents from Citystaff.
Task 8: Public Hearing Attendance
MBA personnel,particularly the Project Manager,will be present at public meetings and hearings to
develop an understanding of the public's comments a-d concerns,be available to answer questions on
environmental issues,and make presentations on the EIR.
Task 9:Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
MBA will prepare a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Prcgrari(01VIRP)for adoption at the time of the
CEQA findings.
Task 10:CEQA Notices
MBA will prepare certain CEQA-required notices in compliance with State legislation and guidelines
Task 11'Project Management and Coordination
MBA will place top priority on working as a partner with the City and project team members during the
entire environmental process. We will help anticipate controversial issues,devise solutions,and provide
&.xnerLen,wronmental compliance consultation. Understanding our client's objectives and ensuring they
10
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
Eagle Ranch Specific Par?and Annevation-Environmental Services
PREUMINARYSCOPE OF WORK: MARCH 22,2011
are reflected in the environmental review and analyses are key aspects of our approach.This scope of
work assumes regular interaction with the City,other project team members,as necessary,and requires
frequent information sharing among project team members.
Public Facilities Financing Plan
The following tasks will be undertaken by David Taussig&Associates(DTA)under contract to MBA The
Public Facilities Financing Plan(PFFP)is intended to support the specific plan.The objective of the PFFP is
to ensure that public facilities are adequately financed in a timely manner and are allocated in a way that
is equitable,financially feasible,and consistent with City guidelines and policies.
DTA's specific objectives in assisting in the preparation of the PFFP shall be to(1)Confirm the required
facilities costs and phasing(2)Confirm the anticipated residential and non-residential development and
absorption rates within the Project and,if necessary,outside the Project but within the area of benefit of
the proposed facilities(3)Prepare a cost allocation analysis that distributes facilities costs by land use
category to projected development to occur within the Project and outside the Project but within the area
of benefit of the proposed facilities(4)Compute the amounts charged to development within the Project
and outside the Project but within the area of benefit of the proposed facilities under a development
impact fee program,and(5)Prepare a summary memorandum of the PFFD.
PFFP Task 1: Review and Confirm Facilities Costs and Demographic Data
This task involves identifying and evaluating facilities costs and demographic data m.Specifically.DTA will
conduct the following activities under this task:
• Review data provided by all parties and their consultants regarcing costs associa:ec wit-_he
facilities;
■ Review the projected facilities construction phasing schedule as p,cv deo by all parties and their
consultants;
■ Review data provided by all parties and their eonsuzants regarcing existing land uses and future
projected development within t^e Projec_-
PFFP Task 2:Summarize Facilities Cost and Phasing Data
DTA will prepare a matrix table that lists the facilities costs fo,each year of construction in 2011 dollars
through buildout.based on the project phasing schedule.
PFFP Task 3:Allocate Facilities Costs
This task,involves allocating the facilities costs to projected land uses within the Project and,if necessary.
outside the Project but within the area of benefit of the proposed facilities.Specifically,DTA will conduct
the following activities under this task:
• Project average household size and residential dwelling unit data by land use category,as well as
commercial acreage and anticipated employment. It is assumed that land use,development
absorption,infraa&ll type and construction cost data will be provided by the City,landowners
aiWorodierconsultants. Apportion facilities costs between projected land uses.based on
benefit criteria(e.g.,vehicle trip ends,gallons of water and sewer usage,drainage coefficients.
To to pro•:dad roDTA by:he Cid:.:4 mow nip.and or o:ker Project consrirm.:-.
11
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
Eagle Ranch Specific Plan and Annexation-Environmental Sen-ices
PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF WORK MARCH 22,2031
etc.). Prepare summary tables allocating facilities costs assigned to each land use type within the
Project and outside the Project but within the area of benefit of the proposed facilities;
• Based on this apportionment,calculate the appropriate facilities costs for future single family and
multi-family dwelling units,as well as per acre,per building square foot or per room for future
hotel,commercial,and industrial development;
• Prepare a list of facilities costs assigned to each land use category of development within the
Project and outside the Project but within the area of benefit of the proposed facilities.The
apportionment would be comparable to the amo nts charged to development under a
development impact fee program. DTA would not be preparing an official or legally defensible AB
1600 Fee Justification Study,containing all of the data analysis and legal justifications statutorily
required for one of these studies.
PFFP Task 4: Prepare Public Facilities Financing Plan Memorandum
DTA will prepare a summary memorandum containing a discussion and analysis of the assumptions,
methodology and findings of the Public Facilities Financing Plan discussed under Tasks 1-3. Contained
within this memorandum will be a qualitative description of the various fee programs and land-secured
public financing mechanisms and reimbursement mechanisms available for the financing of facilities.
Financing programs to be qualitatively evaluated may include pay-as-you-go financing(e.g.,impact fees.
development cc-diticns of approval,etc.).annexable community facilities distracts.and assessment
districts.
PFFP Task 5: Meetings
At the City's request.DTA will attend meetings and/or participate in conference calls with City staff and/or
other stakeholders to discuss Project information,the Citys goals and objectives,DTA's assumptions,
and/or the conclusions of the analyses.
Work Schedule:
This schedule identifies major milestones and deliverables.Schedule assumptions are shown below.
ESTIMATE
WORK TASKS,PRODUCTS,AND MILESTONES COMPLETION
Phase 1:Technical Background Data Collection and Analysis
Task.t Project Kick-off Meeting and Site Vmit(assume approiL 3V16/11) 1
Task 2:Peer Review of Technical Studies 4
Deliverable:Provide memo on peer review results 4
Phase 2:Preliminary Analysis of Conceptual Land Use Diagram
Task is Preliminary Environmental Censtra n-s Ana lys s,%Interchange Taff c Sensitivity 12
Analysis;Fiscal Impact Analysis
1�
ITEM NUMBER: C -2
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
Eagle Ranch Specific Plan and Anne tion-Environmental Services
PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF WORK: MARCH 22,2011
Deliverable:Provide memo on results of envirormen ai constrarn,s an,,a��515 12
Task 2:Public Outreach-Review of Conceptual Land Use Diagram and Potential 14
Impacts(Neighborhood Meetings)
Deliverable:Provide memo on results of public outreach meetings 15
Phase 3:Environmental Impact Report
'ask=:Prepare P•ojec:Descript cn 16
Task 2:Notice of Preparatcn and Environmental Scop ng Process 18
Deliverable.Release NOP 18
End NOP Period 22
Conduct Public Scoping Session 20
Task 3:Additional Technical Studies 24
Task 4:Administrative Draft EIR
Deliverable:Submit Administrative Draft EIR to City 36
Receive City Comments on Administrative Draft EIR 38
Deliverable:Submit Sareencheck Administrative Draft to City 40
Receive City comments on Screencheck Administrative Draft EIR 42
Task 5:Draft EIR
Deliverable.Submit Draft EIR to City 43
Distribute Draft EIR for Public Review(45 days) 44
End Public Review Period 50
Task 6:Administrative Final EIR
Deliverable:Submit Administrative Draft Final EIR to City 54
13
13
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
Eagle Ranch Specific Plan and Annexation-Environmental Services
PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF WORK: MARCH 22,2011
ESTEMYE
VMRIK TASKS,PRODUCTS, . MILESTONES
Receive City Comments on Administrative Final EIR 57
Task 7:Final EIR
Deliverable:Submit Final EIR to City 60
Task 8:Public Hearing Attendance TBD
Task 9:Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Deliverable:Submit Draft MMRP to City 52
Receive City Comments on Draft MMRP 54
Deliverable:Submit Final MMRP to City 58
Task 10:CEO.A Notices As required
Task=1:P,oject Management and Coordination Ongoing
The assumptions used,n determining the above project schedule are:
1. Conceptual site plans,previous studies,project-related information.base maps,and ph=graohs
wi l be provided to MBA at the project initiation meeting.
2. Final project description s identified by week 16.
3. A set amount of time is shown for the City's review of each deliverable_ If review schedules
change,the elapsed time of other tasks will be maintained.Review of del,verables.Review of
deliverables by parties ctler than the City shall be determined by the City and could affect
schedule.
4. All technical repots prepared by others will be competed and deemed adequate by Week 24-
5. Admin,strat-we Daft Specific Plan will be available by week 36.
6. The review period for the NOP will be the State-mandated 30 days_
7. The review period for the EIR will be the State-mandated 45 days.
Fee:
The following is a preliminary est,mate of fees for completion of the work tasks descnbed above. The cost
for Phase 3 is estimated;the scope of work and associated cost will be further refined following
completion of Phases.1 and 2.This fee is inclusive of all costs,including meetings,studies,field surveys.
and mapping,except as specifically noted herein.
-.
Professional Labor
PHASE 1:Technical Background Data Cofection and Anatvsis 5�•�'
Total Phase 1 Fee S18.000
14
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 01/08/13
Attachment 2
Eagle Ranch Specific Plan and Annexation-Environmental Services
PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF WORK: MARCH 22,2011
PHASE 2:Preliminary Analysis of Conceptual Land Use Diagram $10,000
Agr cultural Suitability Analysis(MBA) 2,000
Biological Constraints Analysis(MBA) 7.500
Cultural Resource Constraints Analysis(MBA) 30.E
Flood Zone/Fydrolo&Analysis(MBA) 2,000
Slope Analysis(MBA) 2.000
Traffic Sensitivity Analysis(W-Trans) 21-200
Wildfire/Emergency Connectivity Analysis(MBA) 2.000
Fiscal Analvs s(DTA) 18,000
Total Phase 2 Fee $950200
PHASE 3:Environmental Impact Report and Technical Studies S400.000-450,000
Total Phase 3 Fee 5400,000-450,000
PUBLIC FACILITY FINANCING PLAN(DTA)("NOT part of EIR)
Total Professional Fee S533,200-583,200
Assumptions used in determining the above fees are:
1. DTA's fee includes two meetings in either Atascadero or San Luis Obispo.Attendance at additional
out-of-office meetings by DTA personnel beyond those included in the scope of work are not
included and would be billed at a cost of$3.000 per occurrence.Fees are shown in Phase 2.but
may be applied elsewhere in this scope of work.
2_ W-Trans'fee includes a study area consisting of up to ten study intersections,attencance at the
Project kickoff meeting,attendance at two additional meetings,and two public hearings.
Additional meetings would be at a cost of$2,200 per occurrence and hearings would be S2,800
per occurrence.Fees are shown in Phase 2,but may be applied elsewhere in this scope of work.
3. Costs for all meetings and field work are included,except as specificauly noted in the scope of
work.
1311
15