HomeMy WebLinkAbout042412 Amended Agenda-combined . yl
'a`$ i979CITY OF A TASCADERO
CITY COUNCIL
AMENDED AGENDA
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
City Hall
Council Chambers
6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, California
City Council Closed Session: 4:45 p.m.
City Council Regular Session: 6:00 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION: 4:45 P.M.
1. CLOSED SESSION -- PUBLIC COMMENT
2. COUNCIL LEAVES CHAMBERS TO BEGIN CLOSED SESSION
3. CLOSED SESSION -- CALL TO ORDER
a. Conference with Legal Counsel — Anticipated Litigation
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section
54956.9: (One case.)
b. Conference with Labor Negotiators Conference with Labor Negotiators
(Govt. Code Sec. 54957.6)
Agency designated representatives: Wade McKinney, City Manager
Employee Organizations: Atascadero Firefighters Bargaining Unit;
Atascadero Police Association; Service Employees International Union,
Local 620; Mid-Management/Professional Employees; Non-Represented
Professional and Management Workers and Confidential Employees
4. CLOSED SESSION -- ADJOURNMENT
5. COUNCIL RETURNS TO CHAMBERS
6. CLOSED SESSION -- REPORT
REGULAR SESSION — CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council Member Sturtevant
ROLL CALL: Mayor Kelley
Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley
Council Member Clay
Council Member Fonzi
Council Member Sturtevant
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call
PRESENTATIONS:
1. Presentation to American Heritage Girls for Volunteer Efforts in the
City
2. Bike Month Update by Angela Nelson, San Luis Obispo Regional
Rideshare Program Coordinator
3. Employee Service Awards
A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (All items on the consent calendar are considered to
be routine and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion
if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If
comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the
consent calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an
opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the
item before action is taken. DRAFT MINUTES: Council meeting draft minutes
are listed on the Consent Calendar for approval of the minutes. Should anyone
wish to request an amendment to draft minutes, the item will be removed from
the Consent Calendar and their suggestion will be considered by the City
Council. If anyone desires to express their opinion concerning issues included in
draft minutes, they should share their opinion during the Community Forum
portion of the meeting.)
1. City Council Draft Action Minutes — April 10, 2012
■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Draft Action
Minutes of April 10, 2012. [City Clerk]
2. March 2012 Accounts Payable and Payroll
■ Fiscal Impact: $2,684,735.39.
■ Recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable,
payroll and payroll vendor checks for March 2012. [Administrative
Services]
3. City Council 2012 Meeting Schedule - Revised
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council approve the revised City Council meeting
schedule for 2012. [City Manager]
4. Weed/Refuse Abatement Program
■ Fiscal Impact: The City recovers costs for administering this program
through the 150% administrative fee, which is placed on the San Luis
Obispo County Special Tax Assessment for the fiscal year 2012-2013
Tax Roll.
■ Recommendation: Council adopt the Draft Resolution, declaring
vegetative growth and/or refuse a public nuisance, commencing
proceedings for the abatement of said nuisances, and placing all
abatement fees on the San Luis Obispo County Special Tax Assessment
for the fiscal year 2012-2013 Tax Roll. [Fire]
5. Final Map 2007-0161 (Parcel Map AT 11-0114) 13000 Atascadero Ave.
(TPM 2005-0080) Kevin McGurty
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendations: Council:
1. Adopt and approve Final Parcel Map 2007-0161 (Parcel Map AT 11-
0114) and reject the offer of dedication for streets, shown on the
map, without prejudice for future acceptance on behalf of the public;
and,
2. Authorize and direct the City Clerk to endorse the Council's approval
and offer of dedication rejection on the Map. [Public Works]
UPDATES FROM THE CITY MANAGER: (The City Manager will give an oral report on
any current issues of concern to the City Council.)
COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to
address the Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has
jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to three minutes. Please state your name for the
record before making your presentation. Comments made during Community Forum
will not be a subject of discussion. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for
Community Forum, unless changed by the Council. Any members of the public who
have questions or need information, may contact the City Clerk's Office, between the
hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at 470-3400, or mtorgerson(aD_atascadero.orq.)
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None.
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Oak Ridge Estates / 3F Meadows PD-11 Project Update — State Route 41
(Morro Road)/Los Altos Road Intersection
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council consider additional information and find that
the proposed improvements at the intersection of State Route 41 (Morro
Road) and Los Altos Road satisfy the requirements of the Atascadero
Municipal Code, Planned Development 11. [Pubic Works]
2. Strategic Planning 2012 — Council Goals and Action Plan
■ Fiscal Impact: The two-year budget is based on the goals developed
through the strategic planning process. While there is no direct impact as
a result of the approval of this work plan, future budgets will be based on
these goals, and specific projects may require the expenditure of funds or
additional resources.
Recommendations: Council:
1. Adopt the goals selected at the Strategic Planning Workshop of
February 24, 2012; and,
2. Approve the related action plans implementing Council Goals. [City
Manager]
3. Downtown Parking Opportunities and Parking Information Campaign
■ Fiscal Impact: Certain projects may incur cost and a funding source would
need to be identified on a project by project basis.
Recommendations: Council provide feedback on proposed downtown
parking opportunities and the "Park Here!" campaign. [City Manager]
4. Housing Element Annual Progress Report 2011 (PLN 2006-1133)
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council direct staff to submit the attached 2011
Housing Element Annual Progress Report to the State of California.
[Community Development]
5. General Plan Amendment 2012 Timing Exception
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council grant an exception to the date for the non-
reserved General Plan Amendment 2011 Cycle A, to allow a General Plan
Amendment to be considered by Planning Commission and City Council
between May 2012 and December 2012 for the Del Rio Road Commercial
Area Specific Plan (a.k.a. Walmart /Annex). [Community Development].
6. Lake Park Frontage Signage
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council approve the proposed text and graphics for the
main monument sign for the Atascadero Lake Park Frontage Project.
[Public Works]
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative, Council
Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities.
Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take
action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. The Council may
take action on items listed on the Agenda.)
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: (The following represent standing committees.
Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary):
Mayor Kelley
1. Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Committee
2. City of Atascadero Design Review Committee
3. City of Atascadero Finance Committee
4. County Mayors Round Table
5. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC)
6. Homeless Services Oversight Council
7. Oversight Board for the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment
Agency of Atascadero
Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley
1. City / Schools Committee
2. Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA)
3. League of California Cities — CITIPAC Board Member
4. SLO Council of Governments (SLOCOG)
5. SLO Regional Transit Authority (SLORTA)
Council Member Fonzi
1. Air Pollution Control District
2. City of Atascadero Design Review Committee
3. City of Atascadero Finance Committee
4. SLO Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) - alternate
Council Member Sturtevant
1. City / Schools Committee
2. Community Action Partnership of SLO County
3. League of California Cities — Council Liaison
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND / OR ACTION:
1. City Council
2. City Clerk
3. City Treasurer
4. City Attorney
5. City Manager
F. ADJOURNMENT
Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that
person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. Correspondence submitted at this
public hearing will be distributed to the Council and available for review in the City Clerk's office.
I, Victoria Randall, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of perjury that
the foregoing amended agenda for the April 24, 2012 Regular Session of the Atascadero City Council
was posted on April 19, 2012, at the Atascadero City Hall, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA
93422 and was available for public review in the Customer Service Center at that location.
Signed this 19`h day of April, 2012, at Atascadero, California.
Victoria Randall, Deputy City Clerk
City of Atascadero
City of Atascadero
WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 6:00 p.m. unless there is a
Community Redevelopment Agency meeting commencing at 6:00 p.m. in which event the Council meeting will commence
immediately following the conclusion of the Community Redevelopment Agency meeting. Council meetings will be held at
the City Hall Council Chambers, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero. Matters are considered by the Council in the order of
the printed Agenda. Regular Council meetings are televised live, audio recorded and videotaped for future playback.
Charter Communication customers may view the meetings on Charter Cable Channel 20 or via the City's website at
www.atascadero.org. Meetings are also broadcast on radio station KPRL AM 1230. Contact the City Clerk for more
information (470-3400).
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file
in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public inspection during City Hall business hours at the Front Counter of
City Hall, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, and on our website, www.atascadero.org. An agenda packet is also
available for public review at the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road. Contracts, Resolutions and Ordinances will be
allocated a number once they are approved by the City Council. The minutes of this meeting will reflect these numbers.
All documents submitted by the public during Council meetings that are either read into the record or referred to in their
statement will be noted in the minutes and available for review in the City Clerk's office.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting
or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office or the City Clerk's Office, both at (805)
470-3400. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in
assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA
Under Agenda item, "COMMUNITY FORUM", the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having business with the
Council to approach the lectern and be recognized.
1. Give your name for the record (not required)
2. State the nature of your business.
3. All comments are limited to 3 minutes.
4. All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council.
5. No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any other
individual, absent or present
This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes will be
allowed for Community Forum (unless changed by the Council). If you wish to use a computer presentation to support
your comments, you must notify the City Clerk's office at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Digital presentations must
be brought to the meeting on a USB drive or CD. You are required to submit to the City Clerk a printed copy of your
presentation for the record. Please check in with the City Clerk before the meeting begins to announce your presence
and turn in the printed copy.
TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS (from Title 2, Chapter 1 of the Atascadero Municipal Code)
Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will give their
report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is open and
will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being considered to step up to the lectern. If
you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way:
1. You must approach the lectern and be recognized by the Mayor
2. Give your name (not required)
3. Make your statement
4. All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council
5. No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any other
individual, absent or present
6. All comments limited to 3 minutes
The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public comments will be
heard by the Council.
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 04/24/12
F1_ ®R F-,l
o�
1915 R NOD
--- C�
E; � CITY OF ATASCADERO
CITY COUNCIL
DRAFT ACTION MINUTES
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
6:00 P.M.
City Hall
Council Chambers
6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, California
REGULAR SESSION — CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M.
Mayor Kelley called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and Council Member Fonzi led the
Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Council Members Clay, Fonzi, Sturtevant, Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley
and Mayor Kelley
Absent- None
Others Present: City Clerk / Assistant to City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson
Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manager Jim Lewis,
Public Works Director Russ Thompson, Police Chief Jerel Haley,
Fire Chief Kurt Stone, and City Attorney Brian Pierik.
Draft Atascadero City Council Minutes
April 10, 2012
Page 1 of 4
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 04/24/12
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley and seconded by Council Member
Fonzi to approve the agenda.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. City Council Draft Action Minutes — March 27, 2012
■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Draft Action
Minutes of March 27, 2012. [City Clerk]
2. City Council and Planning Commission Joint Meetinq Draft Action
Minutes — March 27, 2012
■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Council and Planning
Commission Joint Meeting Draft Action Minutes of March 27, 2012. [City
Clerk]
3. Amendment to City's Section 125 Flexible Benefits Plan for Employees
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendations: Council:
1. Authorize the City Manager to execute the attached Clarifying
Amendment and Certificate of Adopting Resolution, amending the
City's Flexible Benefits Plan for employees; and,
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute future administrative clarifying
amendments and certificates of adopting resolutions for the City's
Flexible Benefits Plan. [City Manager]
4. February 2012 Accounts Payable and Payroll
■ Fiscal Impact: $2,387,270.99.
■ Recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable,
payroll and payroll vendor checks for February 2012. [Administrative
Services]
MOTION: By Council Member Fonzi and seconded by Council Member
Sturtevant to approve the Consent Calendar.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
UPDATES FROM THE CITY MANAGER:
City Manager Wade McKinney gave an update on projects and issues within the City.
Draft Atascadero City Council Minutes
April 10, 2012
Page 2 of 4
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 04/24/12
COMMUNITY FORUM:
The following citizens spoke during Community Forum: Pastor Steve Shively, David
Broadwater (Exhibit A), Mike Brennler, and Ron Rothman.
Mayor Kelley closed the COMMUNITY FORUM period.
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None.
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Oak Ridge Estates / 3F Meadows PD-11 Project Update
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council receive and file this updated project report
[Pubic Works]
Deputy Public Works Director David Athey gave the staff report and answered
questions from the Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
The following citizens spoke on this item: Joe Durvin, Deborah Paskin, Don Ritter,
Mitch Paskin, and Mike Brennler.
Mayor Kelley closed the Public Comment period.
The City Council received this report.
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS:
The City Council Members made brief announcements.
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: None
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND / OR ACTION: None
F. ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Kelley adjourned the meeting at 7:18 p.m.
Draft Atascadero City Council Minutes
April 10, 2012
Page 3 of 4
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 04/24/12
MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C.
City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager
The following exhibit is available for review in the City Clerk's office:
Exhibit A— Prepared statement from David Broadwater
Draft Atascadero City Council Minutes
April 10, 2012
Page 4 of 4
ITEM NUMBER: A- 2
DATE: 04/24/12
EBEA
tCascadero City Council
Staff Report - Administrative Services Department
March 2012 Accounts Payable and Payroll
RECOMMENDATION:
Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for
March 2012.
DISCUSSION:
Attached for City Council review and approval are the following:
Payroll
Dated 3/1/12 Checks # 29429 - 29462 $ 16,102.34
Direct Deposits 232,412.71
Dated 3/15/12 Checks # 29463 - 29495 17,236.91
Direct Deposits 229,353.55
Dated 3/29/12 Checks # 29496 - 29524 19,309.38
Direct Deposits 238,264.54
Accounts Parable
Dated 3/1/12 - 3/31/12
Checks # 132270 - 132598
& EFTs 1082 - 1097 1,932,055.96
TOTAL AMOUNT $ 2,684,735.39
FISCAL IMPACT:
Total expenditures for all funds is $ 2,684,735.39
CERTIFICATION:
The undersigned certifies that the attached demands have been released for pay,.mPnt
and that funds are available for these demands ) `F
Rachelle Rickard, DirectoF78f Administrative Services
ATTACHMENT:
March 2012 Eden Warrant Register in the amount of $ 1,932,055.96
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
1082 03/02/2012 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Payroll Vendor Payment 856.81
132270 03/02/2012 ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN. Payroll Vendor Payment 760.00
132271 03/02/2012 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 40.00
132272 03/02/2012 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS Payroll Vendor Payment 1,254.00
132273 03/02/2012 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC. Payroll Vendor Payment 2,727.49
132274 03/02/2012 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Payroll Vendor Payment 300.00
132275 03/02/2012 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 8,525.00
132276 03/02/2012 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment 410.91
132277 03/02/2012 SEIU LOCAL 620 Payroll Vendor Payment 819.95
132278 03/02/2012 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 Payroll Vendor Payment 311.61
132279 03/02/2012 VANTAGEPOINTTRNSFR AGT 304633 Payroll Vendor Payment 1,811.20
1083 03/05/2012 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEA Payroll Vendor Payment 42,815.35
1084 03/05/2012 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEP Accounts Payable Check 55,521.89
132280 03/05/2012 ALLSTATE WORKPLACE DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 3,912.94
132281 03/05/2012 CSAC- EIA Payroll Vendor Payment 1,172.37
132282 03/05/2012 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES Payroll Vendor Payment 1,643.35
132283 03/05/2012 PREFERRED BENEFITS INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 9,719.97
132284 03/05/2012 SDRMA Payroll Vendor Payment 143,323.30
1085 03/06/2012 RABOBANK, N.A. Payroll Vendor Payment 39,837.85
1086 03/06/2012 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 9,703.44
1087 03/06/2012 EMPLOYMENT DEV, DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1,208.61
132285 03/09/2012 A& R CONSTRUCTION Accounts Payable Check 1,452.00
132286 03/09/2012 A TS APPLIANCE SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 342.34
132287 03/09/2012 AGP VIDEO, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,830.00
132288 03/09/2012 TREVOR R. AGUILAR Accounts Payable Check 180.00
132289 03/09/2012 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC Accounts Payable Check 176.15
132290 03/09/2012 AMERICAN WEST TIRE&AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 80.34
132291 03/09/2012 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS Accounts Payable Check 69.58
132292 03/09/2012 ASSC. OF ZOOS&AQUARIUMS Accounts Payable Check 195.00
132293 03/09/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 172.54
132294 03/09/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 318.49
132295 03/09/2012 ATASCADERO HAY& FEED Accounts Payable Check 912.50
132297 03/09/2012 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 5,278.80
132298 03/09/2012 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 478.95
132299 03/09/2012 ATASCADERO TRAFFIC WAY STORAGE Accounts Payable Check 576.00
City of Atascadero
'Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2012
Check Check
[Number Date Vendor Description Amount
132300 03/09/2012 LAUREN E.AUSTIN Accounts Payable Check 40.00
132301 03/09/2012 BASSETT'S CRICKET RANCH,INC. Accounts Payable Check 122.68
132302 03109/2012 LUCA P. BENEDETTI Accounts Payable Check 179.00
132303 03/09/2012 BERNARDS Accounts Payable Check 175,045.70
132304 03/09/2012 BERRY MAN, INC. Accounts Payable Check 522,70
132305 03/09/2012 BLUEPRINTER Accounts Payable Check 63.02
132306 03/09/2012 NICHOLAS P. BOONISAR Accounts Payable Check 180.00
132307 03/09/2012 ALEX J. BRAZZI Accounts Payable Check 99.00
132308 03/09/2012 GREGORY A. BRAZZI Accounts Payable Check 240.00
132309 03/09/2012 JEFFREY A. BRAZZI Accounts Payable Check 150.00
132310 03/09/2012 BREZDEN PEST CONTROL., INC. Accounts Payable Check 176.00
132311 03/09/2012 SHIRLEY R. BRUTON Accounts Payable Check 129.00
132312 03/09/2012 BURKE,WILLIAMS, &SORENSON LLP Accounts Payable Check 9,825.52
132313 03/09/2012 BUTLER BUSINESS MACHINES Accounts Payable Check 138.35
132314 03/09/2012 CA CODE CHECK, INC. Accounts Payable Check 6,954.89
132315 03/09/2012 CCC-ICC Accounts Payable Check 30.00
132316 03/09/2012 NORMA CERVANTES Accounts Payable Check 100.00
132317 03/09/2012 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS Accounts Payable Check 945.66
132318 03/09/2012 CHEM-DRY OF NORTH COUNTY Accounts Payable Check 387.00
132319 03/09/2012 BRADY CHERRY Accounts Payable Check 600.00
132320 03/09/2012 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 80.00
132321 03/09/2012 KATHLEEN J. CINOWALT Accounts Payable Check 245.00
132322 03/09/2012 CITY OF FRESNO Accounts Payable Check 864.00
132323 03/09/2012 COAST RIDERS POWERSPORTS Accounts Payable Check 341.63
132324 03/09/2012 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT Accounts Payable Check 41.62
132325 03/09/2012 CORELOGIC INF. SOLUTIONS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 100.00
132326 03/09/2012 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 31.39
132327 03/09/2012 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 64.35
132328 03/09/2012 MATTHEW J. CURRY Accounts Payable Check 165,00
132329 03/09/2012 CALEB M. DAVIS Accounts Payable Check 179.00
132330 03/09/2012 DANIEL A. DAVIS Accounts Payable Check 406.00
132331 03/09/2012 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 173.88
132332 03/09/2012 SABRINA M. DEGNAN Accounts Payable Check 30.00
132333 03/09/2012 DOCUTEAM Accounts Payable Check 40.60
132334 03/0912012 D-PREP, LLC Accounts Payable Check 294.00
132335 03/09/2012 ECS IMAGING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 8,953.00
132336 03/09/2012 ED'S FLY MEAT, INC. Accounts Payable Check 103.00
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
132337 03/09/2012 EL CAMINO VETERINARY HOSP Accounts Payable Check 47.50
132338 03/09/2012 GEOFF ENGLISH Accounts Payable Check 34.63
132339 03/09/2012 BRANDON S. ERICKSON Accounts Payable Check 44.00
132340 03/09/2012 ESCUELA DEL RIO Accounts Payable Check 80.00
132341 03/09/2012 EWING IRRIGATION GOLF INDUSTRL Accounts Payable Check 48.13
132342 03/09/2012 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 692.70
132343 03/09/2012 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL Accounts Payable Check 72.00
132344 03/09/2012 FIRST STRING SPORTS Accounts Payable Check 1,731.84
132345 03/09/2012 FIRST TRANSIT, INC. Accounts Payable Check 18,637.56
132346 03/09/2012 FLUID RESOURCE MANAGEMENTJNC. Accounts Payable Check 5,010.14
132347 03/09/2012 KEN FORMAN Accounts Payable Check 218.12
132348 03/09/2012 FOSTER FARMS DAIRY Accounts Payable Check 35.22
132349 03/09/2012 WARREN FRACE Accounts Payable Check 300.00
132350 03/09/2012 FRAZEE INDUSTRIES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 360.51
132351 03/09/2012 GALLS, LLC Accounts Payable Check 68.45
132352 03/09/2012 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 1,924.92
132353 03/09/2012 ANDREW J. GEFTAKYS Accounts Payable Check 74.00
132354 03/09/2012 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 341.74
132355 03/09/2012 MATTHEW R. GIL Accounts Payable Check 60.00
132356 03/09/2012 GOLDING CONCRETE SAWING Accounts Payable Check 250.00
132357 03/09/2012 JASON C. GOOSSENS Accounts Payable Check 44.00
132358 03/09/2012 NATHAN B. GOOSSENS Accounts Payable Check 168.00
132359 03/09/2012 BRADLEYA. HACKLEMAN Accounts Payable Check 733.50
132360 03/09/2012 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 2,165.50
132361 03/09/2012 MELINDA A. HARTMAN Accounts Payable Check 283.20
132362 03/09/2012 ETHAN L. HICKS Accounts Payable Check 90.00
132363 03/09/2012 KODIE E. HOOD Accounts Payable Check 88.00
132364 03/09/2012 EVELYN R. INGRAM Accounts Payable Check 1,092.00
132365 03/09/2012 INHOUSE SECURITY SERVICE, LLC Accounts Payable Check 875.05
132366 03/09/2012 ISIS Accounts Payable Check 988,41
132367 03/09/2012 JAKE FANNING CONSTRUCTION Accounts Payable Check 1,738.40
132368 03/09/2012 CAROL D. JANSSEN Accounts Payable Check 687.60
132369 03/09/2012 JIFFY LUBE Accounts Payable Check 31.99
132370 03/09/2012 JK'S UNLIMITED Accounts Payable Check 1,130.03
132371 03/09/2012 JOHASEE REBAR, INC. Accounts Payable Check 2,974,99
132372 03/09/2012 KIRK CONSTRUCTION Accounts Payable Check 2,554.12
132373 03/09/2012 WILLIAM T. KNUCKLES Accounts Payable Check 120.00
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listinq
For the Month of March 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
132374 03/09/2012 L.N. CURTIS & SONS Accounts Payable Check 348.51
132375 03/09/2012 JAMES R. LEWIS Accounts Payable Check 250.00
132376 03/09/2012 LIFEASSIST, INC. Accounts Payable Check 524.75
132377 03/09/2012 ZACHARIAH M. LINDSAY Accounts Payable Check 96.00
132378 03/09/2012 MADRONE LANDSCAPES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 15,514.39
132379 03/09/2012 STEVEN A. MANIER Accounts Payable Check 2.75
132380 03/09/2012 MARK SWITZER EXCAVATING Accounts Payable Check 9,255.26
132381 03/09/2012 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 881.72
132382 03/09/2012 MEDWORKS MEDICAL CENTER Accounts Payable Check 100.00
132383 03/09/2012 MICHAEL BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES Accounts Payabie Check 51,890.84
132384 03/09/2012 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 198.18
132385 03/09/2012 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 55.07
132386 03/09/2012 REON C MONSON Accounts Payable Check 186.00
132387 03/09/2012 MSA-CENTRAL COAST CHAPTER Accounts Payable Check 35.00
132388 03/09/2012 NORTH COAST ENGINEERING INC. Accounts Payable Check 2,504.00
132389 03/09/2012 TIMOTHY R. NOWAK Accounts Payable Check 88.00
132390 03/09/2012 MATTHEW J. O'CONNELL Accounts Payable Check 45.00
132391 03/09/2012 RYAN J. O'CONNELL Accounts Payable Check 121.00
132392 03/09/2012 OFFICE DEPOT INC. Accounts Payable Check 574.38
132393 03/09/2012 JULIE OGDEN-PURCELL Accounts Payable Check 60.00
132394 03/09/2012 OLD CAMOZZI'S SALOON Accounts Payable Check 50.00
132395 03/09/2012 ONTRAC Accounts Payable Check 5.35
132396 03/09/2012 TARA ORLICK Accounts Payable Check 17.76
132397 03/09/2012 PACIFIC COAST GYMNASTICS CENTE Accounts Payable Check 225.40
132399 03/09/2012 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 9,009.73
132400 03/09/2012 FLAVIA PAROTTI Accounts Payable Check 21.44
132401 03/09/2012 PASO ROBLES FORD LINCOLN MERC Accounts Payable Check 356.31
132402 03/09/2012 PASO ROBLES SAFE& LOCK Accounts Payable Check 139.37
132403 03/09/2012 PENFIELD & SMITH ENGINEERS INC Accounts Payable Check 4,522.00
132404 03/09/2012 PEOPLES SELF HELP HOUSING CORP Accounts Payable Check 15,317.70
132405 03/09/2012 SHANNON PERRY Accounts Payable Check 70.00
132406 03/09/2012 SCOTT E. PIPAN Accounts Payable Check 179.00
132407 03/09/2012 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY,INC. Accounts Payable Check 625.05
132408 03/09/2012 PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT Accounts Payable Check 3,456.23
132409 03/09/2012 JERI RANGEL Accounts Payable Check 36.00
132410 03/09/2012 HEIDI REIFERS Accounts Payable Check 25.00
132411 03/09/2012 RACHELLE RICKARD Accounts Payable Check 336.00
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
132412 03/09/2012 ROB DAVIS BACKHOE Accounts Payable Check 500.00
132413 03/09/2012 MICHELLE R. ROGERS Accounts Payable Check 399.00
132414 03/09/2012 ALLISON RYAN Accounts Payable Check 39.02
132415 03/09/2012 S.W. MARTIN &ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 11,083.33
132416 03/09/2012 F I D E L SALAMANCA Accounts Payable Check 99.84
132417 03/09/2012 NEPTALI DEGUZMAN SALINAS Accounts Payable Check 60,00
132418 03/09/2012 KRISTIN M. SCOTT Accounts Payable Check 189.00
132419 03/09/2012 JOHN C. SIEMENS Accounts Payable Check 217.00
132420 03/09/2012 LISSA SLEAN Accounts Payable Check 17.60
132421 03/09/2012 SLO CO HEALTH AGENCY Accounts Payable Check 1,383.00
132422 03/09/2012 SMARTAND FINAL Accounts Payable Check 132.84
132423 03/09/2012 DAVID L. SMAW Accounts Payable Check 180.00
132424 03/09/2012 ELIZABETH STRICKLAND Accounts Payable Check 244.16
132425 03/09/2012 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1,657.00
132426 03/09/2012 RONALD R.TARICA Accounts Payable Check 360.00
132427 03/09/2012 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS Accounts Payable Check 71,61
132428 03/09/2012 RUSS THOMPSON Accounts Payable Check 392.00
132429 03/09/2012 MARCIATORGERSON Accounts Payable Check 14.98
132430 03/09/2012 TOSTE CONSTRUCTION, INC. Accounts Payable Check 13,103.10
132431 03/09/2012 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check 6,252.83
132432 03/09/2012 RENE VASQUEZ Accounts Payable Check 179.00
132433 03/09/2012 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 2,063.67
132434 03/09/2012 WALLACE GROUP Accounts Payable Check 6,287.74
132435 03/09/2012 BRANDON J. WELLS Accounts Payable Check 40.00
132436 03/09/2012 KAREN B.WYKE Accounts Payable Check 73.80
1088 03/15/2012 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON Accounts Payable Check 382,256.25
132437 03/15/2012 CHEVRON &TEXACO BUS, CARD Accounts Payable Check 1,073.22
132438 03/15/2012 SHELL Accounts Payable Check 793.91
132439 03/15/2012 WRIGHT EXPRESS FSC-76 FLEET Accounts Payable Check 222.10
132440 03/15/2012 WRIGHT EXPRESS FSC-76 UNIVERSL Accounts Payable Check 10,896.08
1089 03/16/2012 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Payroll Vendor Payment 856.81
1090 03/16/2012 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEf Payroll Vendor Payment 42,571.61
1091 03/16/2012 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTED Payroll Vendor Payment 56,168.51
132441 03/19/2012 ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN. Payroll Vendor Payment 760.00
132442 03/19/2012 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 40.00
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
132443 03/19/2012 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS Payroll Vendor Payment 1,254.00
132444 03/19/2012 AXA EQUITABLE Payroll Vendor Payment 520.12
132445 03/19/2012 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC. Payroll Vendor Payment 2,727.49
132446 03/19/2012 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC. Payroll Vendor Payment 175.00
132447 03/19/2012 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Payroll Vendor Payment 300.00
132448 03/19/2012 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 8,275.00
132449 03/19/2012 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment 456.14
132450 03/19/2012 SEIU LOCAL 620 Payroll Vendor Payment 809.78
132451 03/19/2012 VANTAGEPOINTTRNSFR AGT 106099 Payroll Vendor Payment 311.61
132452 03/19/2012 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 Payroll Vendor Payment 1,761.20
1092 03/20/2012 RABOBANK, N.A. Payroll Vendor Payment 39,098.54
1093 03/20/2012 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 9,294.33
1094 03/20/2012 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1,144.51
132453 03/23/2012 ADVANCED SEPTIC&SEWER SVC Accounts Payable Check 1,050.00
132454 03/23/2012 TREVOR R.AGUILAR Accounts Payable Check 45.00
132455 03/23/2012 A€RGAS USA, LLC Accounts Payable Check 41.57
132456 03/23/2012 AIR-RITE REFRIGERATION Accounts Payable Check 1,800.00
132457 03/23/2012 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC Accounts Payable Check 176.15
132458 03/23/2012 MARITZAALMQUIST Accounts Payable Check 172.34
132459 03/23/2012 ALPHA FIRE SPRINKLER CORP. Accounts Payable Check 13,890.69
132460 03/23/2012 AL'S SEPTIC PUMPING SVC, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,265.00
132461 03/23/2012 AMERICAN MARBORG Accounts Payable Check 214.84
132462 03/23/2012 AMERICAN WEST TIRE&AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 1,734.70
132463 03/23/2012 AM] PIPE& SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 1,337.05
132465 03/23/2012 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 1,262.40
132466 03/23/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 60.71
132467 03/23/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 706.64
132469 03/23/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 910.87
132470 03/23/2012 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 1,252.45
132471 03/23/2012 ATASCADERO WASTE ALTERNATIVES Accounts Payable Check 100.00
132472 03/23/2012 ATD, INC. Accounts Payable Check 120.00
132473 03/23/2012 ASHLEY AVERY Accounts Payable Check 80.00
132474 03/23/2012 AW DIRECT, INC. Accounts Payable Check 513.58
132475 03/23/2012 JAMES F. BACHMAN Accounts Payable Check 120.00
132476 03/23/2012 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON Accounts Payable Check 2,120.00
132477 03/23/2012 BERRY MAN, INC. Accounts Payable Check 125.45
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
132478 03/23/2012 JUSTIN BLACK Accounts Payable Check 117.96
132479 03/23/2012 ALEX J. BRAZZI Accounts Payable Check 55.00
132480 03/23/2012 GREGORY A. BRAZZI Accounts Payable Check 30.00
132481 03/23/2012 JEFFREYA. BRAZZI Accounts Payable Check 75.00
132482 03/23/2012 BURKE,WILL.IAMS, &SORENSON LLP Accounts Payable Check 2,229.20
132483 03/23/2012 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 11.49
132484 03/23/2012 CA CODE CHECK, INC. Accounts Payable Check 7,373.65
132485 03!23/2012 CAL-COAST MACHINERY, INC Accounts Payable Check 83.40
132486 03/23/2012 COASTAL COPY, LP Accounts Payable Check 244.65
132487 03/23/2012 COASTAL REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 328.82
132488 03/23/2012 COLONY AUTO SERVICE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 979.14
132489 03/23/2012 COMPUCOM Accounts Payable Check 14,790.60
132490 03/23/2012 CORELOGIC INF. SOLUTIONS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 100.00
132491 03/23/2012 COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Accounts Payable Check 36.00
132492 03/23/2012 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 74.33
132493 03/23/2012 CULLIGAN INDUSTRIAL WATER SYST Accounts Payable Check 70.00
132494 03/23/2012 D4 ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 2,342.65
132495 03/23/2012 DARRYUS LOCK AND SAFE Accounts Payable Check 51.48
132496 03/23/2012 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 100.72
132497 03/23/2012 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Accounts Payable Check 864.00
132498 03/23/2012 DIANI BUILDING CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 15,583.76
132499 03/23/2012 DISH NETWORK, LLC Accounts Payable Check 91.99
132500 03/23/2012 JORDON T. DONOVAN Accounts Payable Check 100.00
132501 03/23/2012 DRIVE CUSTOMS Accounts Payable Check 1,389.30
132502 03/23/2012 EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC Accounts Payable Check 25,762.50
132503 03/23/2012 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SPEC., INC. Accounts Payable Check 670.00
132504 03/23/2012 FARWEST LINE SPECIALTIES Accounts Payable Check 74.65
132505 03/23/2012 FASTENAL COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 2,634.77
132506 03/23/2012 FENCE FACTORY ATASCADERO Accounts Payable Check 350.00
132507 03/23/2012 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 304.50
132508 03/23/2012 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL Accounts Payable Check 848.00
132509 03/23/2012 FIRST TRANSIT, INC. Accounts Payable Check 18,212.40
132510 03/23/2012 FRAZEE INDUSTRIES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 198.71
132511 03/23/2012 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 52.44
132512 03/23/2012 ANDREW J. GEFTAKYS Accounts Payable Check 152.00
132513 03/23/2012 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 522.73
132514 03/23/2012 GILBERT'S LANDSCAPES Accounts Payable Check 407.91
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
132515 03/23/2012 GOLDEN STATE COPIER&MAILING Accounts Payable Check 1,868.00
132516 03/23/2012 GOLDEN STATE STEEL Accounts Payable Check 19,440.00
132517 03/23/2012 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 9.39
132518 03/23/2012 H.D. PETERSON Accounts Payable Check 552,40
132519 03/23/2012 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 375.97
132520 03/23/2012 HARVEY'S HONEYHUTS Accounts Payable Check 1,070.72
132521 03/23/2012 JEFF HUMPHREY Accounts Payable Check 36.27
132522 03/23/2012 IMPACT ABSORBENTS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 796.72
132523 03/23/2012 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Accounts Payable Check 328.32
132524 03/23/2012 INGLIS PET HOTEL Accounts Payable Check 429.39
132525 03/23/2012 INTERSPIRO, INC. Accounts Payable Check 355.45
132526 03/23/2012 JAMES R. MURPHY, A LAW CORP. Accounts Payable Check 165.00
132527 03/23/2012 JIFFY LUBE Accounts Payable Check 18.18
132528 03/23/2012 JK'S UNLIMITED Accounts Payable Check 367.50
132529 03/23/2012 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER Accounts Payable Check 1,680.00
132530 03/23/2012 WILLIAM T. KNUCKLES Accounts Payable Check 45.00
132531 03/23/2012 KPRL 1230 AM Accounts Payable Check 320.00
132532 03/23/2012 LANDSCAPES BY STACH Accounts Payable Check 250.00
132533 03/23/2012 LARRY'S AUTOMOTIVE Accounts Payable Check 143.22
132534 03/23/2012 LEHIGH HANSON Accounts Payable Check 6,690.88
132535 03/23/2012 LIFE ASSIST, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,249.25
132536 03/23/2012 MAINLINE UTILITY CO. Accounts Payable Check 900.00
132537 03/23/2012 MICHAEL BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 23,739.00
132538 03/23/2012 MID-COAST MOWER & SAW, INC. Accounts Payable Check 53.21
132539 03/23/2012 MID-STATE SOLID WASTE & RECYCG Accounts Payable Check 245.13
132540 03/23/2012 MILLENNIUM CONSULTING ASSC. Accounts Payable Check 4,010.50
132541 03/23/2012 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 314,90
132542 03/23/2012 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 127.11
132543 03/23/2012 MOSS, LEVY, & HARTZHEIM LLP Accounts Payable Check 2,000.00
132544 03/23/2012 TAMMY NIXON Accounts Payable Check 25.00
132545 03/23/2012 OFFICE DEPOT INC. Accounts Payable Check 934.62
132546 03/23/2012 BARRY OGDEN Accounts Payable Check 60.00
132547 03/23/2012 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 46.83
132548 03/23/2012 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 25,060.06
132549 03/23/2012 PASO ROBLES FORD LINCOLN MERC Accounts Payable Check 3,291.91
132550 03/23/2012 PERFORMANCE SWEEPING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,680.00
132551 03/23/2012 PERRY FORD Accounts Payable Check 14.36
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of March 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
132552 03/23/2012 PERRY'S ELECTRIC MOTORS &CTRL Accounts Payable Check 4,946.95
132553 03/23/2012 PLANT DOCTOR Accounts Payable Check 400.00
132554 03/23/2012 JASON M. PLATZ Accounts Payable Check 95.00
132555 03/23/2012 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY,INC. Accounts Payable Check 850.75
132556 03/23/2012 PRW STEEL SUPPLY, INC. Accounts Payable Check 366.58
132557 03/23/2012 ROB DAVIS BACKHOE Accounts Payable Check 2,000.00
132558 03/23/2012 S.W. MARTIN&ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 11,083.33
132559 03/23/2012 SAN LUIS POWERHOUSE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 135.00
132560 03/23/2012 SAN LUIS SECURITY, INC. Accounts Payable Check 657.00
132561 03/23/2012 SANTA LUCIA SPORTSMEN ASSC INC Accounts Payable Check 280.00
132562 03/23/2012 ROBYN C. SCHMIDT Accounts Payable Check 329.00
132563 03/23/2012 SCOTT DAVIS CONSULTING Accounts Payable Check 1,931.25
132564 03/23/2012 SCOTT T. MURRAY PLUMBING Accounts Payable Check 22,663.80
132565 03/23/2012 SLO COUNTY NEWSPAPERS-TRIBUNE Accounts Payable Check 1,016.00
132566 03/23/2012 SLO INTERNATIONL FILM FESTIVAL Accounts Payable Check 125,00
132567 03/23/2012 DAVID L. SMAW Accounts Payable Check 75.00
132568 03/23/2012 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY Accounts Payable Check 1,095.44
132569 03/23/2012 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO COMM. Accounts Payable Check 31,133.00
132570 03/23/2012 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1,064.00
132571 03/23/2012 SUPERIOR CRANE&TRANSPORT Accounts Payable Check 1,452.00
132572 03/23/2012 TAFT ELECTRIC COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 17,674.11
132573 03/23/2012 LESLIE R.THOMPSON Accounts Payable Check 36.00
132574 03/23/2012 TOMARK SPORTS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 132.29
132577 03/23/2012 U.S. BANK Accounts Payable Check 16,307.74
132578 03/23/2012 U.S. POSTMASTER Accounts Payable Check 600.00
132579 03/23/2012 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST, INC Accounts Payable Check 145.30
132580 03/23/2012 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check 4,086.38
132581 03/23/2012 IWINA M. VAN BEEK Accounts Payable Check 133.00
132582 03/23/2012 MATT VIERRA Accounts Payable Check 181.00
132583 03/23/2012 WELL SEEN SIGN COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 90.09
132584 03/23/2012 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 36.05
132585 03/23/2012 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 924.08
132586 03/23/2012 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 858.00
132587 03/26/2012 BURKE,WILLIAMS, & SORENSON LLP Accounts Payable Check 3,912.00
132588 03/26/2012 CITY OF ATASCADERO Accounts Payable Check 242.00
132589 03/27/2012 CSAC- EIA Payroll Vendor Payment 1,165.95
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listinq
For the Month of March 2012
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amount
132590 03/27/2012 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES Payroll Vendor Payment 1,679.39
132591 03/27/2012 SDRMA Payroll Vendor Payment 149,349.16
132592 03/29/2012 ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN, Payroll Vendor Payment 760.00
132593 03/29/2012 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Payroll Vendor Payment 300.00
132594 03/29/2012 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 8,275.00
132595 03/29/2012 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment 471.51
132596 03/29/2012 SEIU LOCAL 620 Payroll Vendor Payment 802.30
132597 03/29/2012 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 Payroll Vendor Payment 311.61
132598 03/29/2012 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 Payroll Vendor Payment 1,761.20
1095 03/30/2012 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Payroll Vendor Payment 856.81
1096 03/30/2012 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEIti Payroll Vendor Payment 42,007.06
1097 03/30/2012 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEP Payroll Vendor Payment 55,645.46
$ 1,932,055.96
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
DATE: 04/24/12
r
�� 4 r r ri i078'r?
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — City Manager's Office
City Council 2012 Meeting Schedule - Revised
RECOMMENDATION:
Council approve the revised City Council meeting schedule for 2012.
DISCUSSION:
The Council approved the City Council 2012 Meeting Schedule on December 13, 2011 .
Generally the Council meets once in the summer months of July and August, which was
reflected in the original schedule. However, staff has determined that a second meeting
in July may be necessary, so the July 24, 2012 meeting date is being added to the
regular meeting schedule. The attached revised schedule reflects this change.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENT:
City Council 2012 Meeting Schedule-revised
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment
City of At
Office of the City Clerk
Atascadero City Council 2012 Meeting Schedule- Revised
MEETING DATE TYPE OF MEETING
January 10 Regular
January 24 Regular
February 14 Regular
February 28 Regular
March 13 Regular
March 27 Regular
April 10 Regular
April 24 Regular
May 8 Regular
May 22 Regular
June 12 Regular
June 26 Regular
July 10 Regular
July 24 Regular
August 14 Regular
September 11 Regular
September 25 Regular
October 9 Regular
October 23 Regular
November 13 Regular
November 27 Regular
December 11 Regular
Meetings are held at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall,
6907 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422
Phone: 805-470-3400
City CouncihCouncil Meeting Schedule-re02012
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 04/24/12
1918 � f 19 �
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — Fire Department
Weed/Refuse Abatement Program
RECOMMENDATION:
Council adopt the Draft Resolution, declaring vegetative growth and/or refuse a public
nuisance, commencing proceedings for the abatement of said nuisances, and placing
all abatement fees on the San Luis Obispo County Special Tax Assessment for the
fiscal year 2012-2013 Tax Roll.
DISCUSSION:
Atascadero Municipal Code, Section 6-13.03, addresses the abatement of vegetative
growth and/or refuse, which constitute a hazard. Adoption of the proposed Resolution is
the first step in this annual program, which requires City Council action. The Fire
Department conducted its initial inspection during the month of April. There are
approximately 11,110 parcels within the City. The list of parcels identified to have
vegetative growth and/or refuse, which are or may become a public nuisance, is
available for review in the Office of the City Clerk and the Atascadero City Fire
Department.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City recovers costs for administering this program through the 150% administrative
fee, which is placed on the San Luis Obispo County Special Tax Assessment for the
fiscal year 2012-2013 Tax Roll.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Resolution declaring vegetative growth and/or refuse a public nuisance
2. Vegetative Growth Notice
3. Vegetative Growth / Refuse Notice
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
DRAFT RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING VEGETATIVE GROWTH
AND/OR REFUSE A PUBLIC NUISANCE
WHEREAS,the City of Atascadero Fire Department is commencing proceedings for the
abatement of said nuisances; and
WHEREAS, abatement fees will be placed on the San Luis Obispo County Special Tax
Assessment for the Fiscal Year 2012-2013 tax roll,
NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of
Atascadero:
SECTION 1. That vegetative growth and/or refuse are a public nuisance and hereby
declare to be such for the reasons that vegetative growth may attain such a large growth as to
become a fire menace and/or drainage restriction, when mature and said refuse may become a
public nuisance,thereby creating a hazard to public health.
The City Council of the City of Atascadero finds and declares that vegetative growth and/or
refuse on specified parcels of property are seasonal and recurrent nuisances. Such seasonal and
recurrent nuisances shall be abated in accordance with the provisions of City and State laws. No
further hearings need to be held, and it shall be sufficient to mail a notice to the owner of the
property as their address appears upon the current assessment roll.
SECTION 2. A description of the parcel of lots of private property upon which, or in
front of which, said nuisances exist, according to the official Assessment Map of said City of
Atascadero, shall be posted annually in the office of the City Clerk and referred to as Exhibit A
(Vegetative Growth) and Exhibit B (Weeds &Refuse).
SECTION 3. The City Clerk or designee is hereby ordered and directed to mail written
notices of the proposed abatement to all persons owning property described in accordance with
Section 6-13.08 of the Atascadero Municipal Code.
SECTION 4. Pursuant to Section 6-13.10 of the Atascadero Municipal Code, the City
Council shall hear and consider all objections or protests to the required removal of said
vegetative growth and/or refuse. The City Clerk shall post a copy of the public hearing notice in
accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act.
SECTION 5. Pursuant to Section 6-13.17 of the Atascadero Municipal Code, if the
owner does not abate the hazard, it will be abated by the city contractor. The cost of the
abatement plus a 150% administrative fee and county fee will be assessed upon the county
property tax bill, and constitute a lien upon such land until paid.
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
Draft Resolution
Page Two
On motion by Council Member and seconded by
Council Member , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted
in its entirety on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO
By:
Bob Kelley, Mayor
ATTEST:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
Draft Resolution
Page Three
EXHIBITS "A" and"B" ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
City of Atascadero
Fire Department
NOTICE
Dear Atascadero Property Owner:
THIS NOTICE IS NOT SENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
IF YOU RECEIVED THIS NOTICE
YOU ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE WEED ABATEMENT ORDINANCE
Weed abatement season has arrived and parcel inspections were performed throughout the City during
the first two weeks of April. The City's Municipal Code, Section 6-13.08, requires this notification, which
enables the Fire Department to abate dry noxious weeds in an effort to make our neighborhoods safer in
the event of a fire.
THE DEADLINE FOR COMPLIANCE IS JUNE 1, 2012
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE IN MAINTAINING YOUR
VEGETATIVE GROWTH TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 4 INCHES
NOTICE TO DESTROY VEGETATIVE GROWTH (NOXIOUS WEEDS)
Notice is hereby given that on the 24'h day of April 2012, the City Council passed a resolution declaring
that vegetative growth (noxious weeds) constitutes a fire hazard, which must be abated by the cutting of
said vegetative growth (noxious weeds). If the owner does not comply within 30 days of the date of this
letter, it will be abated by the city, and the cost of the abatement will be billed to the property owner
directly, or assessed upon the county property tax bill, and will constitute a lien upon such land until paid.
The City recovers costs for administering this program through a 150% administrative fee. Reference is
hereby made to the resolution for further particulars and Municipal Code Sections 6-13.01 through 6-
13.17. A copy of said resolution is on file in the office of the city clerk.
All property owners having any objections to the proposed removal of the hazard are hereby notified to
attend a meeting of the City Council of the City of Atascadero to be held MaV 22, 2012 at 6:00 p.m., when
their objections will be heard and given due consideration.
Dated: This 25`h day of April 2012. /s/ Kurt W. Stone
Fire Chief
City of Atascadero, California
6005 LEWIS AVENUE—ATASCADERO, CA 93422— (805)461-5070— FAX (805)466-2907
The deadline for weed/refuse abatement compliance is June 1, 2012
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
On June 1, 2012, the City's contractor begins the abatement process for parcels that are not in
compliance. The contractor's fees, as well as applicable City and County fees/fines are assessed on the
County's tax roll.
The Fire Chief has established the following requirements:
CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS
OF VEGETATIVE GROWTH (NOXIOUS WEEDS)
a) Maximum height of 4 inches;
b) Located within 100 feet of any building or structure, or to the property
line, whichever is nearer;
c) Located within 50 feet from the edge of any improved roadway;
d) Located within 50 feet from each property line;
e) Located within 10 feet on each side of driveways.
EXEMPTIONS:
a) Animal pastures and agricultural fields growing hay or grains. The interior portion of fenced pastures
where the quantity of livestock significantly reduces the vegetative growth, therefore bringing the
parcel into compliance. Agricultural fields must be cut at harvest time. Uncut hay and grain is subject
to abatement.
b) Habitat for endangered or threatened species or any species that is a candidate for listing as an
endangered or threatened species by the State of California or Federal Government.
c) Land kept in a predominantly natural state as habitat for wildlife, plant, or animal communities.
d) Open space lands that are environmentally sensitive parklands.
e) Other lands having scenic values.
Abatement requirements shall remain in effect in waterways where flood preparation measures and
emergency flood control mitigation is necessary.
1) This exemption applies whether the land or water are held in fee title or any lesser interest. This
exemption applies to any public agency, and private entity that has dedicated the land or water areas
to one or more of those purposes or uses, or any combination of public agencies and private entities
making that decision.
2) This section shall not be construed to prohibit the use of properly authorized prescribed burning to
improve the biological function of land or to assist in the restoration of desired vegetation.
3) In the event that any lands adjacent to land or water areas, as described above, are improved such
that they are subject to this chapter, the obligation to comply with Section 6-13.04 shall be with the
person owning, leasing, controlling, operating, or maintaining the occupied dwelling or occupied
structure on the improved lands. All maintenance, activities, and other fire prevention measures
required by Section 6-13.04 shall be required only for the improved land, and water areas as
described above.
Questions regarding weed abatement may be directed to 805-470-3300 or by writing to: City of
Atascadero, Fire Department, Fire Marshal, 6005 Lewis Ave., Atascadero, CA 93422.
PLEASE RETAIN THIS NOTICE FOR ANY RELATED COMMUNICATIONS
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 3
City of Atascadero
Fire Department
Dear Atascadero Property Owner:
THIS LETTER IS NOT SENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
IF YOU RECEIVED THIS NOTICE
YOU ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE WEED ABATEMENT ORDINANCE
An inspection was made on the above stated parcel and your property was identified to be in violation of Municipal
Code Sections 6-13.01 to 6-13.17 and Uniform Fire Code (UFC) Section 1103.2.4. The City's Municipal Code,
Section 6-13.08, requires this notification, which enables the Fire Department to abate all vegetative growth and
refuse that may create a fire or health and safety hazard(s) in our neighborhoods. We have identified Vegetative
Growth/Refuse.
NOTICE TO REMOVE
VEGETATIVE GROWTH(NOXIOUS WEEDS)AND REFUSE
Notice is hereby given that on the 24th day of April 2012, the City Council passed a resolution declaring
that vegetative growth (noxious weeds) and refuse constitute a fire hazard, and health and safety hazard,
which must be abated by the cutting of said noxious weeds, and removal of said health and safety hazard.
If the owner does not comply within (30) days of the date of this letter, it will be abated by the city, and the
cost of the abatement will be billed to the property owner directly, or assessed upon the county property
tax bill, and will constitute a lien upon such land until paid. The City recovers costs for administering this
program through a 150% administrative fee. Reference is hereby made to the Resolution for further
particulars and Municipal Code Sections 6-13.01 through 6-13.17. A copy of said Resolution is on file in
the Office of the City Clerk.
All property owners having any objections to the proposed removal of the health hazard are hereby
notified to attend a meeting of the City Council of the City of Atascadero to be held on May 22, 2012 at
6:00 p.m.when their objections will be heard and given due consideration.
Dated: This 25th day of April 2012
/s/Kurt W. Stone
Fire Chief
City of Atascadero, California
The deadline for weed/refuse abatement compliance is June 1, 2012
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 3
On June 1, 2012, the City's contractor begins the abatement process for parcels that are not in
compliance. The contractor's fees, as well as applicable City and County fees/fines are assessed on the
County's tax roll.
The Fire Chief has established the following requirements:
CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS
OF VEGETATIVE GROWTH (NOXIOUS WEEDS)
a) Maximum height of 4 inches;
b) Located within 100 feet of any building or structure, or to the property
line, whichever is nearer;
c) Located within 50 feet from the edge of any improved roadway;
d) Located within 50 feet from each property line;
e) Located within 10 feet on each side of driveways.
EXEMPTIONS:
a) Animal pastures and agricultural fields growing hay or grains. The interior portion of fenced pastures
where the quantity of livestock significantly reduces the vegetative growth, therefore bringing the
parcel into compliance. Agricultural fields must be cut at harvest time. Uncut hay and grain is subject
to abatement.
b) Habitat for endangered or threatened species or any species that is a candidate for listing as an
endangered or threatened species by the State of California or Federal Government.
c) Land kept in a predominantly natural state as habitat for wildlife, plant, or animal communities.
d) Open space lands that are environmentally sensitive parklands.
e) Other lands having scenic values.
Abatement requirements shall remain in effect in waterways where flood preparation measures and
emergency flood control mitigation is necessary.
1) This exemption applies whether the land or water are held in fee title or any lesser interest. This
exemption applies to any public agency, and private entity that has dedicated the land or water areas
to one or more of those purposes or uses, or any combination of public agencies and private entities
making that decision.
2) This section shall not be construed to prohibit the use of properly authorized prescribed burning to
improve the biological function of land or to assist in the restoration of desired vegetation.
3) In the event that any lands adjacent to land or water areas, as described above, are improved such
that they are subject to this chapter, the obligation to comply with Section 6-13.04 shall be with the
person owning, leasing, controlling, operating, or maintaining the occupied dwelling or occupied
structure on the improved lands. All maintenance, activities, and other fire prevention measures
required by Section 6-13.04 shall be required only for the improved land, and water areas as
described above.
Questions regarding weed abatement may be directed to 805-470-3300 or by writing to: City of
Atascadero, Fire Department, Fire Marshal, 6005 Lewis Ave., Atascadero, CA 93422.
PLEASE RETAIN THIS NOTICE FOR ANY RELATED COMMUNICATIONS
ITEM NUMBER: A- 5
DATE: 04/24/12
1915 ISI 187
A tascadero City Council
Staff Report — Public Works Department
Final Map 2007-0161 (Parcel Map AT 11-0114)
13000 Atascadero Ave. (TPM 2005-0080)
Kevin McGurty
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Council:
1. Adopt and approve Final Parcel Map 2007-0161 (Parcel Map AT 11-0114)
and reject the offer of dedication for streets, shown on the map, without
prejudice for future acceptance on behalf of the public; and,
2. Authorize and direct the City Clerk to endorse the Council's approval and
offer of dedication rejection on the Map.
DISCUSSION:
Tentative Parcel Map 2005-0080 was approved by the Planning Commission on
December 6, 2011. The Tentative Parcel Map approved the division of a 9.93
acre lot into two lots of 1 and 8.93 acres.
Staff has determined that the Parcel Map is in substantial conformance with
approved Tentative Parcel Map. Pursuant to California Government Code
Section 66474.1 the approving legislative body (City Council) cannot deny a
parcel map that is in substantial conformance with the previously approved
tentative map. Also, Pursuant to California Government Code Section
66477.1(a), at the time the legislative body approves a parcel map, the legislative
body shall also accept, accept subject to improvement, or reject any offer of
dedication. There are no offers of dedication on this map.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENT: Final Map 2007-0161 (Parcel Map AT 11-0114)
ITEM NUMBER: A- 5
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment
Final Map 2007-0161 (Parcel Map AT 11-0114)
13000 Atascadero Ave.
Kevin McGurty
C
atit
dryr `•Y i 'a ��! ? sst� � r � �G@�! � 1.
+�� "�0 v t • a <ui9
i Q$YrJSiaBY ,,, 'f
ri a
� Y
ApQ�, \1 t ! !} E
tOr AVIA,90, \ Q
Sn
ssrnw-sKS3-T
b �1l10 t4tM1 �
hp
--
�"�'�£ s Ern
D
:= a
v �
-
gg�� 1
�M , IRµ •�� �\ ♦ .��ts�Y� 1
0
+ ; <
�1 \ \\ � /� �„a] i \ fit•*�to
x
OVOU Om30V)SV'LV -
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
r
1918 m p;i 1978
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — Public Works Department
Oak Ridge Estates / 3F Meadows
PD-11
State Route 41 (Morro Road)/Los Altos Road Intersection
RECOMMENDATION:
Council consider additional information and find that the proposed improvements at the
intersection of State Route 41 (Morro Road) and Los Altos Road satisfy the
requirements of the Atascadero Municipal Code, Planned Development 11.
REPORT IN BRIEF:
This item was previously discussed before Council on April 10, 2012. Staff had
erroneously concluded that the City Engineer could make a decision on this issue
based on Planned Development 11, which allows the City Engineer to make road
design decisions for the City. For most projects this is the case. However, staff has
since discovered that we made a mistake in not presenting this item for a re-
consideration of a previous November 22, 2005 Council action. The November 2005
Council action found that the then proposed improvements did not meet the intent of
the Municipal Code, and the developer was directed to construct the improvements as
originally designed. The developer has since provided additional traffic safety
information and Caltrans input on the preferred project alternative that was rejected by
Council in 2005. Therefore, the Developer is requesting that the November 2005
Council action be reconsidered based on this new information, and the Developer be
allowed to construct the Caltrans preferred intersection alternative.
DISCUSSION:
Background- This staff report describes the current status of the offsite improvement
permit requirements related to the Los Altos/State Route 41 intersection (Los
Altos/SR41). The project update presented in March of 2010 informed Council that the
City had stopped issuing home construction permits. The City had stopped issuing
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
permits because Oak Ridge Estates had not completed their onsite and offsite
subdivision improvements as required by Planned Development 11 (PD-11).
The original 3-F Meadows Ranch project was approved by the City Council in February
1995. The project included a lot line adjustment map (LLA 94005), a zone change
(ZCH 94-001), which created the PD-11 zoning district, a colony road abandonment
(RA 94-001), and the certification of an Environmental Impact Report. The project
resulted in the reconfiguration of 115 existing residential lots on approximately 550
acres. The project created 111 single-family residential lots and one lot for a future
water tank to serve the project. The other three lots were dedicated as 256 acres of
open space. An additional 39 acres of conservation easements were created over the
single-family lots.
Summary: Project construction began in 2003 after the project was acquired by
Castlerock Development. Since then, permits for 26 single-family homes have been
issued and finaled. As a result of the economic downturn, construction on the project
has been very limited since 2006. The last housing permit was issued in the summer of
2007. Currently a limited construction crew is maintaining the site and working on road
improvements.
ITEM NUMBER: c - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Project Map
j /lum •=
Ile
� r 1
r
w w
vp
OF
i• r �
v �
� � r
v r V •
r
V
v V �►
V o • ,
V
V V V V ! .
V
V y
:• V
fto
v V
�a
I, • •i.Z.�f
i v y� • ,
v
t
� � r.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
One of the project requirements listed in PD-11, requires off-site road improvements at
Los Altos/SR41 to be completed within three years of the issuance of Phase I housing
permits. Staff sent a letter dated March 8, 2010, to Castlerock Development, stating
that no further residential building permits will be issued for the project until these
improvements have been completed. Staff has been working with the Oak Ridge
Estates to get the improvement constructed. The remainder of this report focuses on
the offsite improvements at Los Altos/SR41.
Analysis:
Off-Site Improvements
The suspension of project residential permitting is preventing the construction of
additional dwelling units that could contribute additional traffic to Los Altos/SR41 .
Therefore, there are currently no public safety issues caused by the non-compliance
with PD-11. However, the Developer has been working to design and complete the
required off-site improvements at Los Altos/SR41 so permit issuance may resume.
Planned Development 11 requires the developer to construct the following Los
Altos/SR41 improvements:
1. A Left-turn lane shall be constructed on State Highway 41 for eastbound traffic
entering Los Altos Road.
2. Vehicle refuge lanes shall be constructed for vehicles turning left onto State
Highway 41 from Los Altos Road.
3. Provide a minimum of five hundred fifty (550) feet of sight distance at the
intersection of Los Altos Road and State Highway 41 .
4. Advisory and warning signage shall be installed along State Highway 41 to advise
drivers of the approaching intersection with Los Altos Road.
5. Designated right-turn lane shall be constructed on State Highway 41 for westbound
traffic entering Los Altos Road.
The aforementioned improvements must be constructed when the average daily traffic
(ADT) on Los Altos Road reaches five hundred (500) vehicles per day, with the
development of the twenty-seventh lot in Phase 1, or within three (3) years of the
issuance of building permits for Phase 1 , whichever is earlier. The improvements are
now required since it has been over three years since the first building permits have
been issued.
City staff has met with the developer on numerous occasions to discuss the scope of
the Los Altos/SR41 improvements. Castlerock has also been working with Caltrans and
has received direction from Caltrans' staff regarding Caltrans' preferred alternative.
Caltrans has twice provided direction to Castlerock related to Caltrans's preferred
intersection alternative. The first was in June 2005 and more recently in November
2010. A 2005 Caltrans' plan review letter discussed the potential environmental
impacts to the adjacent creek from right turn channelization. The 2005 letter informed
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Castlerock that Caltrans no longer desires right turn channelization and requested that
the intersection be constructed to a Standard 405.7 right turn taper (shown as
Attachment 1 of Exhibit A). The 2005 letter directed Castlerock to proceed with a right
turn taper design. Castlerock subsequently asked the City in 2005 to accept the
improvements that were preferred by Caltrans. The City Engineer presented the
preferred alternative to Council on October 25 and November 22, 2005. Council
rejected the alternative, as discussed below. Since that time Caltrans has reiterated its
position in a 2010 letter re-confirming Caltrans' direction.
Castlerock is requesting that the City reconsider this issue in order to determine if the
intersection improvements requested by Caltrans are consistent with the requirements
of PD-11. In support of their request, Castlerock submitted a detailed traffic
engineering analysis from TPG Consultants. The TPG report supported Caltrans'
direction and provided a supporting traffic analysis. TPG's data indicates that full right
turn channelization was not warranted based on the Final Environmental Impact Report
Traffic data. In addition, Castlerock has submitted another letter from Caltrans that
reiterates the preferred intersection alternative. This letter is included at the end of
Attachment 2.
Consequently, staff decided to obtain an independent analysis of the current and future
traffic conditions resulting from the Oak Ridge Estates development. Staff retained a
traffic engineer, W-trans, to determine whether PD-11's current, Los
Altos/SR41 requirements are still warranted based on applicable traffic evaluation
measures and standards. W-trans' report focused in on the question of whether the
project-generated trips satisfy the warrant for right-turn channelization at Los
Altos/SR41. W-trans' report looked at current and build-out levels of service (LOS) for
the right-turn approach.
FIGURE 1 - SHOWING CURRENT CONDITIONS
t
t 1 EXISTING EDGE OF
ROAD
r'• y �� '
y �♦ t
♦ v . •t
.
1.
EXISTING AC DIKE/EDGE
OF ROAD
r•
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
According to W-trans, the left-turn approach (driving eastbound from Morro Bay)
currently operates at a LOS A, during both the morning and evening peak hours. The
right turn approach (driving westbound from the City) currently operates at LOS B and
C, during the morning and evening peak hours. The report noted that the LOS does not
change with the addition of project traffic that was estimated by the project Final
Environmental Impact Report (FEIR). The project FEIR assumed that 50% of the traffic
would use the SR41/Los Altos Road intersection and 50% would use the connection to
Santa Lucia Road. W-trans also provided a more conservative analysis by assuming
that 75% of the project trips would use Los Altos/SR41 . W-Trans concluded by stating
that full project build-out would not warrant the installation of a westbound right turn
lane on SR41 based on the project EIR as well as their more conservative analysis. W-
Trans further concluded that a right-turn taper is warranted. The existing intersection
does not currently include a full right turn taper (see Figure 1, above).
Under the provisions of PD-11, the City Engineer has the ability to modify road
improvement designs as long as the intent of the improvement is satisfied. However,
Council has previously taken action on this subject so Council will need to make the
decision. The previous Council voted to reject the Caltrans preferred intersection
design on November 22, 2005. The meeting minutes indicate that Council was
concerned about the safety of the new design, lack of additional traffic analysis and
sight distance issues. The staff report and minutes are included as Attachment 1 .
Since that decision, additional traffic safety studies have been completed, the Acting
City Engineer has found the proposed design consistent with the intent of PD-11, and
Caltrans has reiterated its position that the proposed design is the preferred alternative,
both environmentally and operationally.
The City retained an Acting City Engineer In order to address the aforementioned
Council concerns. The current City Engineer cannot make this decision because of a
previous business relationship with Castlerock. Therefore, City staff hired Steve
Sylvester from North Coast Engineering to act as the City Engineer in this instance. Mr.
Sylvester is a California Registered Civil Engineer who has previously worked for the
City of Atascadero as acting City Engineer in the 1990's.
City staff tasked Mr. Sylvester with determining the necessity of a right turn
channelization and refuge lane improvements for Los Altos/SR41 . This review is
necessary since TPG and W-Trans have indicated that full right turn channelization is
not warranted, and Caltrans' has provided Castlerock with direction to prepare an
alternative intersection design. In summary, Mr. Sylvester's task was to determine if the
improvement of a Caltrans Standard 405.7 "standard public road approach intersection"
satisfies the intent of PD-11.
Mr. Sylvester reviewed background documents and visited the intersection as well as
consulted with W-Trans, City staff, and Caltrans. Mr. Sylvester's report is attached as
Exhibit 1. Mr. Sylvester's report makes the following finding and recommendations,
which City staff will direct Castlerock to implement:
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
1. The results of two separate traffic evaluations prepared by registered traffic
engineers (TPG and W-Trans) conclude that right turn channelization is not
warranted for the Los Altos/SR41 intersection.
2. Caltrans has indicated that they are not requiring a full right-turn channelization OF
refuge la e* based on existing plus project traffic volumes, lack of accidents, and
environmental impacts at this location. Caltrans will require that the intersection be
improved to a Standard 405.7 "standard public road approach intersection."
Therefore, the intersection should be improved to meet the requirements of Figure
405.7 "Public Road Intersections" of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual. (See
Figure 2, below)
*Caltrans has clarified in a follow up letter that they have no position for or
against a refuge lane. Caltrans has only provided input on the right turn lane and
sight distance. Additionally, the sight distance Caltrans would require is greater
than the City's PD-11 Requirement by 55 feet. Lastly, the City's analysis
indicates a refuge lane is not warranted. However, Castlerock's current design
includes a refuge area.
3. The current intersection configuration does not meet the Caltrans requirement, and
sight distance and signage are inadequate for existing and project build out
conditions. These items are required to be addressed in PD-11.
4. All other Traffic Safety mitigation measures as required by PD-11, including the sight
distance and signage requirements, should be implemented.
� L
fi. PROPOSED EDGE OF
ROAD
1
kL •,+ ,`.
J / i► ;.
•
FIGURE 2-RIGHT TURN TAPER DESIGN -CALTRANS' PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Lastly, Mr. Sylvester concludes by confirming that "...The intent of the EIR and PD-11
was to mitigate traffic impacts associated with development of the project. Based on
information available at the time, the EIR and PD-11 required right turn and refuge lane
improvements. Based on the updated information provided by the TPG and W-Trans
reports, and the correspondence from Caltrans, it is my professional opinion that the
substitution of a Standard 405.7 "standard public road approach intersection"
improvement at the Los Altos/SR41 intersection would be consistent with the intent of
PD-11 conditions 9-3.656(c)(3) (vi) and (ix) requirements for a "vehicle refuge lane" and
"designated right turn lane..."
Conclusion: Castlerock has submitted additional information that responds to Council's
concerns regarding safety at the intersection and the preferred environmental
alternative. The Acting City Engineer has determined that a Caltrans Standard 405.7
intersection satisfies the intent of the EIR and PD-11 . It appears that Castlerock has
adequately addressed Council's previous concerns in regards to intersection traffic and
safety and Caltrans' preferred environmental alternative. Lastly, Caltrans has the
ultimate authority over the proposed intersection improvements regardless of the City's
requirements. That said, staff will continue to work with Caltrans to insure that the
intent of the improvements conform to the PD-11 requirements as much as possible.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Council may continue the item for more information or revised project design.
2. Council may find that the proposed improvements at the intersection of State Route
41 (Morro Road) and Los Altos Road do not satisfy the requirements of the
Atascadero Municipal Code. Castlerock would be required to construct the
improvements as cited in the Municipal Code. This alternative is not recommended
since Caltrans has stated it prefers the alternative shown graphically in this staff
report. Additionally, the Acting City Engineer has found that the proposed
improvements meet the intent of PD-11 and there will be greater environmental
impacts to the creek that appear to not be able to be mitigated.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Staff Report and Minutes from the November 22, 2005 City Council Meeting
2. Report by Acting City Engineer Steve Sylvester, North Coast Engineering
3. Draft Right Turn Taper Drawing
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
Attachment 1
November 22, 2005 Staff Report and Minutes
"s m l ll�jl"iy m F11
1918 „ m 6 197rto�i
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — Public Works Department
Oak Ridge Estates (3-F Meadows)
Intersection State Route 41 and Los Altos Road Improvements
RECOMMENDATION:
Council find that the proposed improvements for the intersection of State Route 41
(Morro Road) and Los Altos Road meet the requirements of the Atascadero Municipal
Code.
DISCUSSION:
Background:
This agenda item is continued from the October 25th City Council Meeting. At this
meeting, the staff report was given, public testimony was heard and the Council
discussed the item. The Council and public expressed concern that the widened
shoulder for right hand turns, in place of a right hand turn pocket, would not be
adequate for future increased traffic volumes. The Council requested that Caltrans
attend a future meeting to discuss this. Caltrans will attend this meeting to discuss the
issues and answer questions.
Analysis:
Oak Ridge Estates (also known as 3-F Meadows) is a 111 lot planned development on
the west side of Atascadero. The public improvements and homes for Phase 1 are
under construction. The developer, Castlerock Development, has also begun the work
on construction documents for Phases 2 thru 4.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
The conditions for development for this project are listed in the Atascadero Municipal
Code section 9-3.656 "Establishment of Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 11:
(PD 11)". One of the conditions requires the construction of improvements at the
intersection of State Route 41 and Los Altos Road. The improvements consist of a left
turn lane, a right turn lane, a vehicle refuge lane, signage and sight distance
requirements. The conditions are listed in section 9-3.656 (c) (3) (v) thru (ix). These
improvements were required based on comments by Caltrans to the 3-F Meadows
Environmental Impact Report (See Attachment "A").
The project Civil Engineer, R. Thompson Consulting, has begun the design of the
improvements to this intersection. Padre Associates has produced a Natural
Environmental Study (NES) for the area affected by the construction. The NES has
found that the construction of a right turn lane will have environmental impacts to the
south east corner of the intersection. The impacts are caused by the relocation of a
creek, removal of vegetation and loss of wetlands. (See Attachment B) The specific
impacts, according the NES, are:
• Loss of mixed willow series, a community of special concern
• Removal of 3 coast live oak trees and substantial encroachment on 4 coast live
oak trees
• Possible take of birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, as a result of
construction activities
• Temporary fill and permanent fill in waters of the U.S.
• Temporary fill and permanent fill in jurisdictional wetlands
• Impacts to CDFG defined wetlands
The project Civil Engineer and environmental consultant looked for ways to reduce the
environmental impacts of the improvements, while complying with the conditions of
development listed in PD-11. They found that if they reduced the right turn lane into a
widened shoulder for right hand turns that the impacts were substantially reduced, as
follows (See Attachment C):
• Avoid the loss of mixed willow series, a community of special concern
• Reduce possible take of birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, as a
result of construction activities
• Reduce temporary fill and permanent fill in waters of the U.S.
• Avoid impacts to jurisdictional wetlands
The project Civil Engineer forwarded the two plans to Caltrans for their review and
comment. Caltrans responded as follows: "Although we initially indicated that a right
turn channelization was desired, upon further evaluation we have determined that
reconstructing the intersection to conform to the standard public road approach
intersection, as shown in figure 405.2 of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual, will
serve the traffic needs of this intersection while minimizing impacts to the creek." (See
Attachment D). The developer of Oak Ridge Estates, Castlerock Development, Has
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
requested that the improvement be constructed with a widened shoulder for right hand
turns.
Staff is looking for Council determination that the widened shoulder for right hand turns
will meet the intent of PD-11. Following is the text from the Atascadero Municipal Code
concerning the right hand turn requirement.
(ix) Designated right-turn lanes shall be constructed on State Highway 41 for westbound
traffic entering both Los Altos Road and the driveway serving Lots 109-112.
Improvement plans for the right-turn lanes shall be submitted for review and approval by
Caltrans and the City Engineer prior to approval of the Master Development Plan.
The right-turn lane for Los Altos Road shall be constructed when the ADT on Los Altos
Road reaches five hundred (500) vehicles per day, with the development of the twenty-
seventh lot in Phase 1, or within three (3) years of the issuance of building permits for
Phase 1, whichever is earlier.
Conclusion:
Staff has visited the site, discussed the issue with Caltrans and recommends the
project be built with a widened shoulder for right hand turns. The original Caltrans
recommendation was made without the benefit of a field review, detailed site design or
Natural Environmental Study (See Attachment E).
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Do not find proposed improvements for the intersection of State Route 41 (Morro
Road) and Los Altos Road meet the intent of the requirements of the Atascadero
Municipal Code. The developer would be required to construct the improvements
with a right hand turn pocket. This would have increased environmental impacts.
2. Continue the item for more information or revised project design.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A— Caltrans response letter to Project EIR dated October 26, 1994
Attachment B — Caltrans response letter to plan submittal dated June 15, 2005
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
Attachment A— November 22, 2005 Staff Report
STA7�7 OF CALIFOAP41+k-N-F51NE5S.R,ANSPORTAMN AND MOUSING AGENCY y-ITE wkSOiq,G„r„„
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
00 Gov o,,,
NNUASOGASPO.CA 9l•OH11•
T -r..ut,& letter 35
!I October 26, 1991
3F Meadows Ranch
SLO41-11.45
State Clevinbhouse
I400 Tenth Street,Room 121
Sacramento,CA 95314
3F Meadows Ranch Draft Environmental impact Re fx.)rt
SCH 019-4061014
Calt_ans District 5 staff has reviewed the above referenced docurncnt, The following comments
were generated.as a result of the review:
PruFwsc(1 road cutuicctious to thr State Highway shall have left turn channclizations at the cxpcns: 35.1
of the de%clowr. which will have to meet cutTcnt Caltrans Sutndards, A field review with the
developer will be necessary.
Biologic:--1 and archeological sun'eys must be cumpleted turd cover and proposed work within the 35.2
State highwav richt-of-way. Any impacts found within the State ngltt-of-way must be included in
the envu-onniental docuutcnts,with mitigation measures identified.
Pace IV - D 1. The 1991 traffic volumes im.too old. The document crates ADT for Route 41 as 33.3
6460 on this segment. Our records show an ADT of 95W in 1993. Due to the resulting increase
in right turn muvemenu,a designated right ttun hire will be required.
Thant:you for the uppartunity to comment. If you have any questions,please contact me at(ROS)
549-3683.
Sincereiv.
Larry Newland
Intergovernmental Review Coordinator
SS:ss
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
Attachment B — November 22, 2005 Staff Report
STATE OF CAIIFORNIAn&I!WWSS TRANSPORTA310NAIJUJI ING46� 4CY _ ARI DWSCNW'ARLENEGGER .own
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PERMITS DEPARTMENT
50 HIGUERA STREET
SAN LUIS OBISPO.CA 93401-5415 a
PHONE(805)349-3152
FAX (805)549.3062
TDD(805)$49-3259
hltp://www.daLco.lgv/distW
Flex yore power
Be energy e icieni
June 15,2005
05-SLOG-41-11.45
Permit No.: Not assigned
Mr. Russ Thompson,PE
R.Thompson Consulting
7600 Morro Road
Atascadero CA 93422
Dear Mr.Thompson:
Subject: Preliminary Encroachment Permit Application Review—Castlerock Development-3F
Meadows
Thank you for submitting your Encroachment Permit Application for the off-site
roadway improvements to State Highway 41 at the intersection of Los Altos Road in the
City of Atascadero. With your application you included two improvement plans as we
previously requested. One set of plans included right turn channelization improvements
to Los Altos Road,and the other set showed improvements without a right turn lane.
In comparing and evaluating the two plan sets,as well as reviewing the environmental
impacts inventory you provided,we have concluded that constructing the right turn
channelization would require extensive realignment of the creek and removal of most of
the vegetation within the creek area. Furthermore,we recognize the difficulty and
technical infeasibility of realigning the creek to the north due to environmental impacts
and right of way constraints.
Although we initially indicated that right turn channelization at this location was desired,
upon further evaluation we have determined that reconstructing the intersection to
conform to the standard public road approach intersection,as shown in Figure 405.2 of
the Caltrans Highway Design Manual,will serve the traffic needs at this intersection
while minimizing impacts to the creek. Please proceed with the reduced channelization
design.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter please feel free to call me at
(805)549-3497.
'Caltrans improves mobility scroac ralilornis'
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
Mr.Tkiompson
June 15,2005
Page 2 of 2
Sincerely,
Steve Senet,
District Encroachment Permit Engineer
cc James Kilmer
Paul McClintic
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
11 1918 � � � I 1979
CITY OF ATASCADERO
CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
Tuesday, November 22, 2005
7:00 P.M.
CLOSED SESSION: 6:32 p.m.
(Immediately Following Redevelopment Agency Meeting)
1. PUBLIC COMMENT — CLOSED SESSION — None
2. CALL TO ORDER
a. Conference with legal counsel — Existing Litigation
(Govt. Code Sec. 54956.9 (a))
1. City of Atascadero v. Pacific Gas and Electric
3. ADJOURN: 6:49 p.m.
4. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Attorney Patrick Enright announced that the Council met in closed session and no
reportable action was taken.
REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M.
Mayor Scalise called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and Council Member Luna led
the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Council Members Clay, Luna, Pacas, O'Malley and Mayor Scalise
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
Absent: None
Others Present: City Clerk / Assistant to City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson
and Deputy City Clerk Grace Pucci
Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Administrative Services Director
Rachelle, Rickard, Public Works Director Steve Kahn, Community
Services Director Brady Cherry, Community Development Director
Warren Frace, Police Chief John Couch and City Attorney Patrick
Enright.
COMMUNITY FORUM:
Ann Ketcherside spoke about tree removals in Atascadero and asked for clarification on
the zoning for a private property located in Atascadero.
Eric Greening spoke about appropriate mitigation for tree removals. He also suggested
that local artists be permitted to display their work on the walls of the Council Chamber.
Mitch Paskin spoke about San Marcos Road between Los Altos and the Castle Rock
project and asked that he and his neighbors be kept informed about decisions made for
the project that will affect the road.
Mayor Scalise closed the Community Forum period.
There was Council discussion regarding addressing the issue of Public Art in the
Council Chamber at a strategic planning session.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Mayor Scalise announced that Item #A-2 has been pulled from the agenda.
MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by and seconded by
Council Member Clay to approve the agenda as amended.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS:
None
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
PRESENTATION:
1. Proclamation congratulating the Economic Opportunity Commission on
its 40th Anniversary.
Council Member Luna read the Proclamation and presented it to Jim Patterson, 5'h
District Supervisor and Biz Steinberg, CEO of the Economic Opportunity Commission.
Mr. Patterson spoke about the EOC and the services it provides to the community.
Ms. Steinberg thanked the Council and the community for its efforts in support of their
programs.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. City Council Meeting Minutes — October 25, 2005
■ City Clerk Recommendation: Council approve the City Council meeting
minutes of October 25, 2005. [City Clerk]
2. Final Map 2005-0117 (Tract 2640) 1225 EI Camino Real (TTM 2004-0054)
(ECR 24, LLC)
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendations: Council:
1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2005-0117 (Tract 2640); and,
2. Reject, without prejudice to future acceptance, the offers of dedication
for Streets, Open Space Recreation Easements, Public Utility
Easement and Public Drainage Easement; and,
3. Accept offer of dedication for Public Access Easements; and,
4. Authorize City Manager to execute a Subdivision Improvement
Agreement. [Public Works]
Item #A-2 was pulled from the agenda.
3. Temporary Road Closure / Park Dedication — Holiday Lighting Ceremony
— Winter Wonderland
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council approve Draft Resolution authorizing the
temporary road closure for the community events scheduled to take place
on Friday, December 2, 2005. [Community Services]
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
4. Temporary Road Closure — Holiday Musical Walk Around the Lake
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council approve Draft Resolution authorizing the
temporary road closure for the Holiday Musical Walk Around the Lake on
December 3, 2005. [Community Services]
MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley and seconded by Council Member
Luna to approve Items #A-1, 3, and 4.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Item #A-3 Resolution
No. 2005-094, Item #A-4 Resolution No. 2005-095)
B. MANAGEMENT:
1. Oak Ridge Estates (3-F Meadows) Intersection State Route 41 and Los
Altos Road Improvements
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council find that the proposed improvements for the
intersection of State Route 41 (Morro Road) and Los Altos Road meet the
requirements of the Atascadero Municipal Code. [Public Works]
Public Works Director Steve Kahn gave the staff report and answered questions of the
Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Christine Rogers, Castle Rock Development, spoke about the project and answered
questions of Council.
Paul McClintic, Cal Trans, answered questions of Council.
Council Member Pacas expressed concern with safety issues and the need for a right
turn lane.
Council Member Clay also spoke in favor of a right turn pocket.
Brian Maul, San Marcos Road resident, gave specific examples of his concerns
regarding safety issues at this intersection.
Mitch Paskin, San Marcos Road resident, stated his views regarding safety, tree
removals and retaining walls at this intersection.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
Ralph Bettman, San Marcos Road resident, urged the Council to look ahead at future
impacts at this intersection and expressed his concerns with safety on San Marcos and
Los Altos Roads.
Steve Halmoridge, San Marcos Road resident, spoke about traffic safety at this
intersection.
Russ Thompson, applicant's representative, addressed issues raised during the Public
Comment period.
Mitch Paskin stated that the intersection improvement is Castle Rock's responsibility.
Christine Rogers explained Castle Rock's position on the intersection.
Will Arcularius, San Marco Road resident, spoke about inadequate signage and safety
at this intersection.
Mayor Scalise closed the Public Comment period.
Mayor Scalise stated she was concerned with the permitting process and justifications,
however, clearing brush and trees could contribute to safety at the intersection.
Council Member Luna indicated he had hoped for another alternative to mitigate the
environmental damage; something safe for the next 25 years and good for the
neighborhood, however he does not see that this has happened. He stated he is not
convinced that the original design is not a lot safer.
Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley spoke about the importance of getting full cost recovery. He
expressed concern regarding problems at the state level, safety, and lack of analysis
and indicated he would support going back to the original recommendations.
MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member
Clay to find that the proposed improvements for the
intersection of State Route 41 and Los Altos Road does not
meet the intent of the requirements of the Atascadero
Municipal Code, and the implications of this decision is that
the developer would be required to construct the
improvements with the right hand turn pocket as originally
designed.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
C. COMMITTEE & LIAISON REPORTS:
None
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
D. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
City Attorney
City Attorney Patrick Enright reminded Council of the Special Meeting on
Tuesday, November 29tH
E. ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Scalise adjourned the meeting at 8:25 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled
meeting of the City Council on December 13, 2005.
MEETING RECORDED AND MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Grace Pucci, Deputy City Clerk
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
Attachment 2
Report by Acting City Engineer Steve Sylvester, North Coast Engineering
NORTH COAST ENGINEERING, INC.
Civil Engineering - Land Surveying - Project Development
February 22. 2012
City of Atascadero
Public Works Department
6907 EI Camino Real
Atascadero, CA 93442
Attn David Athey. PE, Deputy Public Works Director
Subject. Los Altosll-lighway 41 Right Turn Channelization and Refuge Lane Review
Oak Ridge Estates Planned Development 11 (PD1 1)
Dear Mr Athey,
As requested by the City of Atascadero (City), North Coast Engineering (NCE) has
prepared the following review of the necessity for right turn channelization and refuge
lane Improvements for the Los Attos]Highway 41 intersection. Our analysis is based on
a review of relevant background documents, conversations with W-Trans Inc., City and
Caltrans staff. and a site visit.
Reference Documents
The following documents, provided by City staff. were reviewed
1. 3F Meadows Environmental Impact Report, December, 1994 by sedes.
2. Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 11 (PD1 1).
3 Correspondence (2) from Steve Senet, Department of Transportation, dated
June 15, 2005 and November 9, 2010.
4. 'Traffic Evaluation for the intersection of SR41 (Morro Road) at Los Altos Road',
by TPG Consulting dated October 29, 2009
5 'Los Altos Road/State Route 41 Intersection Evaluation by W-Trans dated
December 21, 2011
6 Preliminary Intersection plans by RTC (no date).
72S Creston Road,Suite B Paso Robles CA 93446 (805)239-3177 FAX(805)739.0758
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
David Athey
City of Atascadero
February 22,2012
Page 2 of 5
Background
Oak Ridge Estates(formerly 3F Meadows) is a 110 single family home development on
the west side of Atascadero. Approximately 20 residential units have been constructed
and occupied. Primary access to the development is from Los Altos Road at Highway
41 (SR41). A secondary access from Cenegal, Laurel and Santa Lucia Roads is
planned for a future phase of the project.
In 1994 an Environmental impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the project. The EIR
included a review of "Traffic Safety" which established mitigation measures for project
impacts. Mitigation Measure 3.c requires the following road upgrades for SR41 to
mitigate safety hazards created by the increased traffic volume at Los Altos Road:
"2) Develop a refuge lane for vehicles turning left onto Morro Road from Los
Altos Road
"3)Develop right turn lane for West bound Morro Road traffic"
A number of other mitigation measures are required for this location but are not included
in this review. The other mitigation measures include a left turn pocket, and sight
distance and signage improvements.
In 1995, the City approved Planned Development 11 (PD-11) for the project. Among
other development requirements, PD-11 established conditions of approval for the
project. PD-11 incorporated all of the Traffic Safety mitigation measures in the EIR,
including the requirements for the SR41 refuge lane and right turn lane at Los Altos
Road.
The EIR assumed that 50% of total project trips would be directed to the Los
Altos/SR41 intersection, but it does not appear that a formal peak hour trip review or
intersection analysis was prepared. A Level of Service analysis was also not prepared.
The recommendation for the right tum lane appears to be based on a California
Department of Transportation (Caltrans) EIR comment fetter. Caltrans' letter requested
two mitigations,the first was the left turn channelization, and the second was a right turn
lane based on their 1993 traffic volumes.
Caltrans has subsequently changed its position on right turn channelization after they
reviewed plans submitted for an encroachment permit in 2005. A June 15, 2005 letter
from Steve Senet, Caltrans Permit Engineer, to the project's representative, indicates
that Caltrans will no longer require the right turn channelization because of a lack of
traffic accidents, extensive creek realignment requirements, environmental concerns,
and right of way constraints. Caltrans is requiring the intersection meet the
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
David Athey
City of Atascadero
February 22,2012
Page 3 of 5
requirements of the "standard public road approach intersection", which would require
tapers (extensions of paved shoulder)from SR41, but not full right tum improvements or
a refuge lane.
Caltrans has since reiterated their position in a November 9, 2010 letter from Steve
Senet to the project's representative. Mr. Senet states that as long as the project trips
do not increase then Caltrans position of improving the intersection to the "standard
public road approach intersection" would remain. Based on my review of the traffic
analysis reports from TPG Consulting and W-Trans, the total number of project trips has
not changed and therefore Caltrans'determination would still apply.
In order to determine if project traffic conditions have changed, two separate traffic
evaluations have been prepared for this intersection. The first, prepared on behalf of
the developer by TPG Consulting, includes updated traffic counts, a Level of Service
analysis, a speed survey, accident research, and a review of right tum channelization
requirements based on the Caltrans Highway Design Manual. This report followed the
assumptions in the EIR that 50% of project traffic would utilize this intersection. The
report concluded that with project buildout, acceptable levels of service would be
maintained, and that lacking any accident history at the location, right turn
channelization is not warranted. This evaluation is consistent with Caltrans' position.
A second, independent traffic evaluation was prepared by W-Trans on behalf of the
City. This study included a review of projected traffic volumes, a Level of Service
analysis, review of collision history, and a Turn Lane Analysis. This study took a more
conservative approach to trip generation in that it used a higher trip generation factor
per residence, and assumed that 75% of project traffic would utilize this intersection
instead of the 50% used in the EIR and TPG report. W-Trans concluded that even with
the more conservative, increased trip rate and usage percentage, the intersection levels
of service would be acceptable. The City's independent evaluation also is consistent
with Caltrans' position.
In addition, W-Trans reviewed the collision history for the area and determined that
there were two collisions within 150 feet of the intersection in the time period of January
1, 2005 through December 31, 2009. W-Trans determined that the collision rate is a
little over half of the statewide average for accidents near similar intersections.
Therefore, W-Trans concluded, based on all the factors that"While a right-turn taper is
warranted based on anticipated p.m. peak hour volumes under Existing plus Project
conditions, a full right-turn lane is not warranted under these conditions." W-Trans's
conclusion is based on the traffic collision analysis,the level of service analysis, and the
turn lane analysis. W-Trans further concluded that a refuge lane (also referred to as left
turn acceleration lane) is not warranted.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
David Athey
City of Atascadero
February 22,2012
Page 4 of 5
A site visit was conducted during the P.M. Peak Hour by the undersigned on
Wednesday, January 11, 2012. The purpose of the visit was to observe existing
intersection conditions. The following observations were noted:
1. There were no significant delays experienced in making the left turn from Los
Altos Road onto SR41; there were adequate gaps in the cross traffic to allow this
turn.
2. The sight distance to the east towards town appears to be obstructed by existing
vegetation.
3. Signage approaching the intersection (westbound)is inadequate.
4. The existing intersection configuration does not appear to meet the requirements
of a Caltrans 405.7"standard public road approach intersection".
5. Traffic turning right on to Los Altos Road must reduce speed significantly in the
travel lane, due to the lack of an adequate taper as well as the limited sight
distance and inadequate signage. This causes traffic behind the turning vehicle
to slow down and/or encroach in to the oncoming lane to pass the turning
vehicle.
Conclusions and Recommendations
1. The results of two separate traffic evaluations prepared by registered traffic
engineers conclude that right turn channelization is not warranted for the SR41/1-os
Altos Road intersection.
2. Caltrans has indicated that they are not requiring a full right turn channelization or a
refuge lane based on existing plus project traffic volumes, lack of accidents, and
environmental impacts at this location. Caltrans will require that the intersection be
improved to a Standard 405.7 "standard public road approach intersection."
Therefore, the intersection should be improved to meet the requirements of Figure
405.7'Public Road Intersections"of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual.
3. The current intersection configuration does not meet the Caltrans requirement, and
sight distance and signage are inadequate for existing and project buildout
conditions. These items are required to be addressed in PD1 1.
4. All other Traffic Safety mitigation measures as required by PD1 1, including the sight
distance and signage requirements, should be implemented.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
David Athey
City of Atascadero
February 22, 2012
Page 5 of 5
The intent of the EIR and PD11 was to mitigate traffic impacts associated with
development of the project, Based on i-iformation available at the time, the EIR and
PD11 required right turn lane and refuge lane improvements. Based on the updated
information provided by the TPG and N'-trans reports, and the correspondence from
Caltrans, it is my professional opinion that the substitution of a Standard 405.7
'standard public rcad approach intersection" improvement at the SR41/t-os Altos
intersection would be consistent with the intent of PD-11 conditions 9-3.656(c)(3) (vi)
and (ix) requirements for a "vehicle refuge lane" and "designated right-turn lane".
Respectfully submitted, gpF
e
I s yl l,� F
1 " 29743
Steven J. Ive�ter, PE * Exp. s/ i
Principal Engineer sr �*
crvn �
�rFOF CA1 �
SJS/mlp
Attachments
1. Standard 4057 intersection detail
2. PD-11 conditions 9-3.656(c)(3)(vi) and (ix)
3. Correspondence from Steve Senet Department of Transportation, dated June
15, 2005
4. Correspondence from Steve Senet Department of Transportation, dated
November 9, 2010
ITEM NUMBER: C . 1
DATE 04/24/12
Attachment 2
HIGHWAY DESIGN MANUAL 400-31
�y1.2',!
Figur 405.7
Public Road Intersections
f
)\ k -0 � � / Q
-
{� /: 7 ` )\ >
o: 3 t u
� x k
§/ d &
2 9 « G to
..CU | CL
k� CO \ /
ƒ8 &2 C� Q CO �
�G fm x
~ 0k
k �£ Bb >m m G
C2 9 §/� tU Ln
$ G r
( w 2 0 0 0
| Ln <t� x i �
|� | >
x _ q- §
a,k
I —� 2 C � x � \ 2
, � »S -
�
fm u 0 f EE
x
2
.9 222 ¥& q q
N' 4 V �2 �I - § xJ �� - §
5 � ce
�\ > � \ § .20
" k $
EZ
& ® 0vv) 1011
/ Ly
1uj \k _o
u Q LU 3 , k
Cr
: Q>
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
9-3.6%Establishment of Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 11: (PD1 1).
The Planne d D evel opment Overlay Z one No. 11 is establi shed as shown on the ofncial
zoning maps(Section 9-1.102 of this title). The conditions of development are established:
Conditions of Approval.
(a) Planning Division.
(1) To ensure conformance with the provisions of the PD-11 Overlay Zone,a master
plan of development shall be prepared which satisfies all of the following conditi ons pri or to the
recordati on o f any final do cument impl ementing Lot Line A dj ustment 94-0 0 5. The Master
D evel opment Plan shall consist of the one(1)inch equal s forty(40) feet plans entitl e d"Pre ci se
Road Alignment/Lot Grading Plan,"amended and supplemented,as required by these
conditions.
(2) A Miti gati on Monitoring Pro gram,prepared in confnrmancewith the Mitigation
Monitoring Plan contained in the final EIR fnr this proj ect, shall be prepared and implemented
prior to the commence-
mentofany construction.Preparation o f the Miti gati on Monitoring Pro gram shall be the
financial responsibility of the appli cant
(3) The applicant shall demonstrate,to the satisfaction of the City Attorney,that
adequate title and/or interest has been obtained for the existing C olony rights-of-way within the
project boundary prior to approval of the Master Development Plan.
(4) The Master D evel opment Plan shall show the location of building envelopes,
leach field areas,and driveways for lots whose average slope exceeds thirty percent(30%). The
buil ding,l ea ch fi el d and driveway 1 o cati ons shall b e subj ect to the revi ew and approval o f the
Community Development Director.
(5) Open space easements to provide wildlife corridors shall be provided in
conformance with the recommendations of the Final EIR. Limits on fencing and other
detrimental uses within easement areas shall be restricted by the proj ect CC and R's. The
location ofthe easements and CC and restrictions shall be subject to the revi ew and approval
of the C ommunity D evel opment Director.
(6) The"Open Space'lots(Lots A,B and C)as shown on Exhibit B shall be offered
for dedication to the City.
(7) Road Abandonment 94-001 shall be completed and all necessary documents shall
be recorded prior to, or simultaneously with the recordation of any final documen(s)
implementing LLA 94-005.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
(8) Retaining walls shall be used wherever feasible to reduce the amount of grading
necessary 8br the construction of roads and homes. Grading plans shall be reviewed by the City
Engineer and Community Development Director to ensure that proposed grading does not
exceed that necessary to develop the site.
(9) Road maintenance agreements,in a Sbrm approved by the City Attorney,shall be
prepared and recorded Sbr each group of lots which share a driveway or other common access.
The agreements may be made a part of the CC and R's,or may be recorded as deed restrictions,
or may b e recorded as separate roa d maintenance agre ements.
(10) The applicant shall prepare a Comprehensive Restoration Plan(CRP)as part of
the road improvement plans. The CRP shall be prepared by a qualified professional and shall
address plant lists,planting methods(to include slope preparation,mulching and slope
protection),and a maintenance program,including weed control and irrigation. The CRP shall be
reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Community Development Director prior to the
issuance ofpemuts for road construction.
(11) The lot line adjustment shall not result in the establishment of any greater number
ofIots that are nonconforming due to lot sizethan currently exists. The lot line adjustment shall
not result in the establishment of any lot which is smaller than the smallest currently existing
Colony lot within the subject site.
(b) FireDepartment.
(1) Water Supply.
(i) Prior to final occupancy release by the City,the minimum required fire flow shall
be one thousand(1000)gallons per minute at twenty(20)psi residual pressure fibra one-
hundred-twenty(120)minute duration in residential development, or as approved by the Fire
Chief. The required fire flow will increase,as provided in UFC Appendix III-A,based on square
feet o f residential construction,with a fiftypercent(50%) fire flowcredit for automatic sprinkler
systems.
V erification must be provided from water company or fire department records in
established areas or by a proof of design test at the completion of new on-site water main
construction. Homes designated strictly as model homes and/or sales offices,but with no
residential occupancy,shall be granted exemption from the required fire flow as approved by the
Fire Chief.
(ii) Underground fire service mains and appurtenances shall con8bnn to HFPA 24
minimum standard and plans are reviewed by the Fire Department prior to installation. The
underground main size shall be a minimum of eight(8)inch diameter.
If combustible building materials are used,a temporary onsite water tank with an
approved Fire Department connection shall be installed prior to any stockpiling or installing any
combustible materials.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
(iii) Fire Hydrants. The minimum number and distribution of fire hydrants is one(1)
hydrant every five hundred(500) fleet as provided in UFC Appendix III-B. The fire hydrant will
be Atascadero Mutual Water C ompany specification with one four and one-half(41/z)inch and
one or more two and one-half(2/z)inch outlets.Existing hydrants may be adequate,provided
they consist of a minimum of one four and one-half(41/)inch and one two and one-half(21/)
inch outlet.
New hydrant color will be Safety Yellow for public right-of-way and Safety Red for
private right-of-way. All hydrants in the public right-of-way to have"Blue Dot' highway
reflector installed on the adjacent street of drivev,ay to clearly identify the fire hydrant location.
(iv) The dwellings shall be equipp ed with a residential automatic fire sprinMer
system. The sprinkler system will be designed and install ed according to NFPA Pamphlet No. 1
3D. The fire department requires a minimum one(1)inch water meter for resi dential sprinkler
systems.
(2) Fire Apparatus Access.
(i) If combustible construction materials are used,all required public access
roadways shall be completed to a minimum width of twenty(2 0) feet, or as described in
subsections(a.)and(b)below,capable of supporting forty thousand(40,000)pounds,with an
all-weather surface,to within one hundred fifty(15 0)feet ofall stockpiles and all sides of
buildings with combustible construction. The access roadways to be posted"No Stopping/Fire
Lane" and shall not be us ed for the storage of materials. Proposed private roads,driveways or
extensions of existing roads shall be designed and constructed as follows:
a. Single-fimilyresidential access road. A vehi cular acces s to more than one parcel
or vehicular access to a single parcel with more than two (2)buildings or more than three(3)
dwelling units shall be twelve(12) fleet width for one-way traffic and sixteen(16)fie et width for
two-way traffic. The road shall also provide for a ten(10) foot fuel modification area on each
side.
b. Driveway. A vehicular access to a single parcel with one(1) or two (2)buildings,
having no more than three(3)dwelling units on a single parcel and any number of accessory
buildings.
Length Required Width
0-49 feet 12 feet
50-99 feet 14 feet
Greater than 16 feet
200 feet (Note 1 and Note 2)
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
NOTE:
1. For driveways exceeding three hundred(300) fleet,turnaround shall be provided at
the building site and must be within fifty(5 0) feet of the dwelling.
2. For driveway exceeding eight hundred(800) feet,a turnout shall beprovidedat
the midpoint or every four hundred(40 0) feet.
(ii) Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance of not
less than thirteen(13)feet and six(6)inches. Driveways shall have not less than fifteen(15)feet
of vertical clearance.
(iii) Fire apparatus access roads and driveways shall be designed and maintained to
support the imposed loads of forty thousand(40,000) pounds at twenty-five(2 5) miles per hour,
and shall be provided with a surface so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities.
(iv) The turning radius o f a fire apparatus access road shall have horizontal inside
radius curvature ofnot less than twenty-eight(2 8) feet insi de radius and forty-eight(4 8)feet
outside radius.
(v) All dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of one hundred fifty(150)
feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for turning around of fire apparatus.
The bulb or cul-de-sac radius shall not be less than forty(4 0) fleet. The hammer-head T shall
extend a minimum o f thirty(3 0) feet to each side of the centerline of the entry road and be
eighteen(18) feet wide. The turnaround shall extend forty(4 0) feet from the entry road and be
a minimum of eighteen(18) feet wide. Where parcels are zoned five(5)acres or larger,
turnarounds shall be provided at intervals of approximately one thousand three hundred twenty
(1,320) feet, or as approved by the Fire Chief. Each dead-end road shall have a turnaround
constructed at its terminus.
(vi) The minimum level of improvement is determined by the grade of the access road
or driveway provi ding access from the road to the building site or parisingarea as follows(UFC
10.204):
Surface Mirdmum Grade
All-Weather Less than 12 percent
Nonskid(Note 1) 12 percent to 16 percent
Nonskid(Note 2) Over 16 percent
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
Note 1. Surface shall be asphalt or concrete in the City of Atascadero Engineering Standard
Specifications and Drawings including a nonskid finish(brushed concrete or equivalent
pavement).
Note 2.A driveway/access road that would provide a grade greater than sixteen percent(16%)
and less than twenty percent(20%)and is designed by a Registered Civil Engineer may be
considered on a case-by-case basis by the Fire Chief.
(vii) The maximum length of dead-end road,including all dead-end roads accessed
from the dead-end roads, shall use the following cumulative lengths as a guideline for approval
by the Fire Chi ef,regardl ess o f the rnunb er o f parcel s served:
Parcels less than 1 acre 800 feet
Parcels 1 ac. to 4.66 ac. 1320 feet
Parcels 5 ac. to 19.99 ac. 2640 feet
Parcels 20 +ac. 5290 feet
All lengths shall be measured from the edge of the roadway surface at the intersection
that begins from the road to the end of the dead-end road surface at its farthest point.Where a
dead-end road crosses areas of differing zones,the shortest allowable length shall apply.
(3) Fuel Management. All parcels shall comply with the fire department's wildland
fuel management program The hazardous vegetation that the program is concerned with is
seasonal and recurrent in nature. Theretre,the operation of the program is planned on a
continuous annual basis.
(c) Engineering Division.
(1) Road Improvements—General.
(i) All road improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the City
Engineering Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or as directed by the City
Engineer.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
(ii) An encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineering Department
prior to the start of construction. The applicant shall enter into a Plan Check/Inspection
agreement with the City.
(iii)Road improvement plans prepared by a registered civil engineer shall be submitted
for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to approval of the Master Development Plan.
Road improvement plans shall conform to the requirements of the City Standard
Specifications, Section 2—Preparation of Plans. R-value testing shall be done,and pavement
sections designed by a registered civil engineer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
(2) Road Improvements—On-Site.
(i) The following roads shall be fully improved to a Rural Hillside Collection
Section(City Std. 404), or as approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of building
permits. The structural section shall be based on a T.I. =5.0.
b. San Marcos Road from the proj ect boundary to the intersection of Cenegal Road
(prior to Phase I);
a. Cenegal Road from the proj ect boundary to the intersection of San Marcos Road
(prior to Phase II);
(ii) All other roads within the proj ect boundary shall be fully improved to a Rural
Hillside Local Section(City Std. 402),or as approved by the City Engineer pri or to the issuance
o f buil ding p ermits. The structural section shall be based on a T.I. =4.0.
(iii)The minimum right-of-wayvizi dth for all on-site roads shall be fifty(50) fleet
(iv)All cul-de-sacs shall meet the requirements of City Standard 415,Typical Cul-de-Sac
for rural areas with an unobstructed turning radius of forty(4 0) feet and a paved radius of thirty-
four(34) feet,or as approved by the City Fire Marshal. Areas not paved within the forty(40)
foot unobstructed turning radius shall be designed and maintained to support imposed loads of
forty thousand(40,000)pounds at twenty-five(2 5)miles per hour and shall be provided with a
surface which provides for all weather driving capabilities.
(v) Slope easements shall be provided on each side of the right-of-way as needed to
accommodate cut slopes,fill slopes and/or retaining structures.
(vi)Curve widening shall be constructed on all on-site roads in conformance with Section
4,Paragraph F of the City Standard Specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer.
(vii) On-site road ahgnments shall be designed such that all existing stre ets,roads and
alleys outside the proj ect boundary,which intersect the proj ect boundary,are provided with,and
capable of obtaining,access from the on-site roads. Road alignments outside the project
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
boundary,which intersectthe project boundary,shall be clearly shown on the improvement
plans.
(viii) The applicant shall install all necessary street name and traffic signs as well as all
necessary traffic striping and markings as required by the City Engineer.
(ix) The applicant shall offer to dedicate all road rights-of-way for m-site roads to the
City. The irrevocable offer of dedication shall be filed prior to, or simultaneouslywith,the
recordation of any final document implementing Lot Line Adjustment 94-005.
(3) Road Improvements—Off-Site.
(i) Curve widening shall be constructed on Los Altos Road from Highway 41 to San
Marcos Road where curve radii is less than two hundred(200)feet. Curve widening shall be
constructed in conformance with Section 4,Paragraph of the City Standard Specifications,or
as approved by the City Engineer.Plans for the curve widening shall be submitted for reviewand
approval by the City Engineer prior to the approval of the Master Development Plan.
The curve widening on Los Altos Road shall be constructed when the ADT on Los Altos
Road reaches five hundred(5 00)vehicles per day,with the development of the twenty-seventh
lot in Phase 1, or within three(3)years of the issuance of building p errnits for Phase 1,
whichever is earlier.
(ii) A "Stop" sign and stop bar shall be constructed at the intersection of Los Altos
Road and San Marcos Road and shall be constructed with the development of Phase 1 of the
proj ect and prior to the issuance of building permits.
(iii) San Marcos Road between Los Altos Road and the project boundary shall be
improved preparatory to acceptance of this portion of road into the City maintained system.
Curve widening shall be constructed where curve radii is less than two hundred(200)
feet. Curve widening shall be constructed in conformance with Section 4,Paragraph F of the
City Standard Specifications,or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for the
curve widening shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to
approval of the Master Development Plan
San Marcos Road between Los Altos Road and the proj ect boundary shall be improved
prior to the development of Phase 1 of the project and prior to the issuance of building permits.
(iv) The applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City for the portion
of San Marcos Road between Los Altos Road and the proj ect boundary. The agreement shall
guarantee that damage to the road which results from construction traffic generated by the
development of the project is properly repaired. The agreement shall be reviewed and approved
by the City Engineer and the City Attorney. The agreement shall remain in-force throughout
construction of Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the proj ect.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
A maintenance security in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and the City Engineer
shall be posted for the portion of San Marcos Road between Los Altos Road and the proj ect
boundary. The maintenance security shall remain effective until final acceptance of both Phase 1
and Phase 2 of the proj ect.
(v) Left-turn lanes shall be constructed on State Highway 41 for eastbound traffic
entering both Las Altos Road and the driveway serving Lots 109-112. Improvement plans for the
left-turn lanes shall be submitted for review and approval by Caltrans and the City Engineer prior
to approval of the Master Development Plan.
The left-tum lanes for Los Altos Road shall be constructed when the ADT on Los Altos
Road reaches five hundred(5 00)vehicles per day,with the development of the twenty-seventh
lot in Phase 1,or within three(3)years of the issuance of buil ding permits for Phase 1,
whicheveris earlier.
The left-tum lanes for the driveways accessing Lots 109-112 shall be constructed with
the development of any portion of Lots 109-112.
(vi)Vehicle refuge lanes shall be constructed for vehicles turning left onto State Higliway
41 from both Los Altos Road and the driveway serving Lots 109-112. Improvement plans for the
refuge lanes shall be submitted for reviewand approval by Caltrans and the City Engineer prior
to approval of the Master Development Plan.
The vehicle refuge lane for Los Altos Road shall be constructed when the ADT on Los
Altos Road reaches five hundred(500)vehicles per day,with the development of the twenty-
seventh lot in Phase 1, or within three(3)years of the issuance of building permits for Phase 1,
whicheveris earlier.
The vehicle refuge lane for the driveways accessing Lots 109-112 shall be constructed
with the development ofany portion of Lots 109-112.
(vii) The improvements required to achieve a mininmm of five hundred fifty(550) feet of
sight distance shall be constructed at the intersection of Los Altos Road and State Highway 41
and at the intersection of the driveway serving Lots 109-112 and State Highway 41.
Improvement plans for the site distance improvements shall be submitted fnr review and
approval by Caltrans and the City Engineer prior to approval of the Master Development Plan.
The site distance improvements for Los Altos Road shall be constructed when the ADT
on Los Altos Road reaches five hundred(500) vehicles per day,with the development of the
twenty-seventh 1 ot in Phas e 1,or withinthree(3)years of the issuance ofbuil ding permits for
Phase 1,whichever is earlier.
The site di stanceimprovemerds for the driveways acces sing L ots 109-112 shall be
constructed with the development of any portion of Lots 109-112.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
(viii)Advisoryand warning signage shall be installed along State Highway 41 to advise
drivers of the approaching intersection with Los Altos Roadand the driveway serving Lots 109-
112. Signage shall be installed which indicates a left-turn lane ahead. Improvement plans for the
signage improvements shall be submitted for review and approval by Caltrans and the City
Engineer prior to approval of the Master Development Plan
The signage improvements for Los Altos Road shall be constructed when the ADT on
Los Altos Road reaches five hundred(500)vehicles per day,with the development of the
twenty-seventh 1 of in Phas a 1,or within three(3)years o f the i ssuance o f buil ding p ermits for
Phase 1,whichever is earlier.
The signage improvements for the driveways accessing Lots 109-112 shall be constructed
with the development ofany portion of Lots 109-112.
(ix)Designated right-tum lanes shall be constructed on State Highway 41 for westbound
traffic entering both Los Altos Road and the driveway serving Lots 109-112. Improvement plans
for the right-tum lanes shall be submitted for reviewand approval by Caltrans and the City
Engineer prior to approval of the Master Development Plan
The right-turn lane for Los Altos Road shall be constructed when the ADT on Los Altos
Road reaches five hundred(5 00)vehicles per day,with the development of the twenty-seventh
lot in Phase 1, or withinthree(3)years of the issuance of buil ding permits for Phase 1,
whichever is earlier.
The right-turn lane for the driveways a cces sing L ots 109-112 shall b e constructed with
the development of any portion of Lots 109-112.
(x) Curve widening shall be constructed on the following roads where curve radii is
Iessthan two hundred(200) feet,. Curve widening shall be constructed in conformance with
Section 4,Paragraph F of the City Standard Specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer.
Plans for the curve widening shall be subrnitted for reviewand approval by the City Engineer
prior to the approval of the Master Development Plan.
a. Laurel Avenue from Santa Lucia Road to Cenegal Road.
b. C enegal Road from Laurel Avenue to the proj ect boundary.
The curve widening shall be constructed when the ADT on Laurel Avenue reaches five
hundred(500) vehicles per day,with the development ofthe thirty-eighth lot in Phase 2, or
withinthree(3)years ofthe issuance of buil ding permits for Phase 2,whichever is eariier.
(xi)A three-foot wide Class II base or other all weather surface walkway shall be
provided along one side Cenegal Road from the proj ect boundary to Laurel Avenue and along
Laurel Avenue from Cenegal Road to Santa Lucia Road, or as approved by the City Engineer.
Improvement plans for the walkways shall be submitted for reviewand approval by the City
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
Engineer and Community Development Director prior to approval of the Master Development
Plan.
The three-foot-wide pedestrian walkway shall be constructed when the ADT on Laurel
Avenue reaches five hundred(500)vehicles per day,with the development of the thirty-eighth
lot in Phase 2, or within three(3)years of the issuance of building permits for Phase 2,
whichever is earlier.
(4) Drainage.
(i) All drainage improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the City
Engineering Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or as directed by the City
Engineer.
(ii) A grading and drainage plan for each lot,prepared by a registered civil engineer,
shall be submitted for reviewand approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of building
permits. A registered civil engineer shall provide a written statement that all work has been
completed and is in full compliance with the approved plans and the Uniform B wilding C ode
(UB C).
(iii)An erosion control plan addressing interim erosion control measures to be used
during the construction shall be submitted for reviewand approval by the City Engineer. Erosion
control measures shall be in-pla ce b etwe en October Istand April 1st.
Prior to issuance of Grading Permits,and if required under the Clean Water Act(CWA),
the applicant shall obtain the necessary permits in compliance with the requirements of the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES).
(5) Utilities.
(i) All relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities shall be the responsibility of
the applicant.
(ii) The applicant. shall submit a composite utility plan signed and approved by a
representative for each public utility company along with the improvement plans.
(iii) The applicant shall install all new utiliti e s(water, gas, electric, cable TV and
telephone)underground. Fire hydrants shall be installed at locations as required by the City Fire
Marshal. Utilities shall be extended to the property line frontage of each parcel or its public
utility easement.
(iv)Any utility trenching in existing streets shall be overlayed to restore a smooth riding
surface to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
(6) General.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
(i) A Preliminary Soils Report shall be prepared for the property to determine the
presence of expansive soil or other soil problems and shall make recommendations regarding
grading of the proposed site. A final soils report shall be submitted by the soils engineer prior to
the final inspection and shall certify that all grading was inspected and approved and that all
work done is in accordance with the plans and the preliminary report.
(ii) All improvements shall be covered with a one hundred percent(100°!0)
Performance Guarantee and a fifty percent(50%)Labor and Materials Guarantee until the
improvements are deemed substantially complete by the City Engineer. Prior to the
final inspection o f the improvements, and before the other guarantees mentioned in this
conditionare released,a ten(10)percent Maintenance Guarantee shall be postedto cover the
improvements fora period of one year fro mthe date of the final inspection. The guarantee
amounts shall b e based on an engineer's estimate submitted by the proj ect engineer and
approved by the City Engineer. The guarantees posted for this project shall be approved by
the City Attorney.
(iii) A mylar copy and a blue line print of as-built improvement plans, signed by the
registered engineer who prepared the plans,shall be provided to the City Engineer prior to the
final inspection.
(iv) The applicant shall acquire title or interest in any off-site land that may be
required to allow for the construction ofthe improvements. The applicant shall bear all costs
associated with the necessary acquisitions.
(v) All improvements shall be completed or bonded for prior to the approval of the
Master Development Plan. If the improvements are to be bonded,the applicant shall enter into a
PerfbrmanceAgreementwith the City. The form and content o f the P erformance Agreement
shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney. (Ord. 409 § 3,2003;
Ord. 286 § 3 Exh. C, 1995)
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
s1w�.aFCieeUl4Yk�-1fUS�ESS.�aAhSl18TAI7U1AhRH0US,k,�1GEZYL' _—- _—_ ALWLDSL1WA@',jagu^!,Uaws,^ W
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PERMITS DEPARTMENT
50 Fi1Gt:F:RA SIRFFT
SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401-5415
PIKINE(SOS)549-3152
FAX (SOS)Ss9-3062
TDD(305)549.3259
ccw�r ew +��of RECEIVED
JUL ()8 2005
June 15.2005
COMMUhm GEVELOPA NT
05-SLO4l-11.45
Permit No.: Not assigned
Mr.Russ Thompson,PE
R.Thompson Consulting
7600 Morro Road
Atascadero CA 93422
Dear Mr-Thompson:
Subject: Preliminary Encroachment Permit Application Review—Castlerock Development-3F
Meadows
Thant:you for submitting your Encroachment Permit Application for the off-site
roadway improvements to State Highway 41 at the intersection of Los Altos Road in the
City of Amseadero. With your application you included two improvement plans as we
previously requested. One act of plans included right turn chiumelization improvements
to Los Altos Road,and the other set showed improvements without a right turn lane.
In comparing and evaluating the two plan sets,as well as reviewing the environmental
impacts inventory you provided,we have concluded that constructing the right turn
channelization would require extensive realignment of the creek and removal of most of
the vegetation within the creek arca. Furthermore,we recognize the difficulty and
technical infeasibility of realigning the creek to the north due to environmental impacts
and right of way constraints.
Although we initially indicated that right turn channelization at this location was dcsimd,
upon further evaluation we have determined that reconstructing the intersection to
conform to the standard public road approach intersection.as shown in Figure 405.2 of
the Caltrans Highway Design Manual.will serve the traffic needs at this intersection
while minimizing impacts to the creek. Please:proceed with the reduced channeti7,ation
design.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter please feel free to call me at
(805)549-3497.
T:S"114 i W ravK=`bi)i q we nW r�lilJmu
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
Mr.Tbompsoo
June 15,2005
Page 2 of 2
Sincerely,
Steve Scnet,
District Encroachmcnt Permit Engineer
cc James Kilmer
Paul McClintic
i
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
aA$1lFCAlIFORVIA-0R131[ _7RAh'sll�gr�,. 7,y t� irlN:M:ENI,_Y
—Axr.�I:o xl lwnRlFw�c�;li.cynAlilM
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
30 HIGUERA STREET
SAN LUIS OBISPO.CA 93401-5415
'HONE (803)549.3101
FAX (805)549-3329
TTY 1311
t 'i' wtv.(Jot.ca.wyv,dut05! Fkx)wrpowr'
B!enelRy f�[e0nf
November 9,2010
Roy E.Ogden, Esquire
Ogden&Fricks LLP
656 Santa Rosa Street,Suite 213
San Luis Obispo,California 93401
Dear Mr.Ogden:
CASTLEROCb SUBDIVISION
This letter is in response to your request for Caltrans to update its position on the need for right
turn channelization at Los Altos Road as part of the off-site improvements for the Castlerock
Subdivision. So long as the subdivisiou plans have not seen changes iliac would increase the
number of trips generated by the project at this intersection since we last reviewed this project in
2005.we can maintain our historical position on this issue.
We previously reviewed substantially complete engineering drawings for the right turn
channelization.and found that there were substantial environmental constraints associated with
altering porrions of the adjacent creek,as well as a demonstrated need for additional right of way
for a right turn channelization project. We find that upgrading the intersection to the standard
public road approach intersection,shown in Figure 405.2 of the Caltrans Highway Design
Manual,would provide a satisfactory design to accommodate vehicles turning right onto Los
Altos Road.
If you require any other information or wish to discuss this matter further please do not hesitate to
call me at(805)549-3206.
Sincerel ,
teve Sonet
District Five F.ner(kichment Permit Engineer
'Caftmnw i"J fmw•rs maway fn'!mw r ahtornfo"
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 3
Attachment 3
Draft Right Turn Taper Drawing
Standard 405.7 Intersection
�a
RIGHT TURN TAPER
WIDENING — 12' WIDE
2�
EXISTING LEFT TURN
-,�
-- -« -- -y-- -- - LANE -----_� `�_- --- -4.
-._- :�
EXISTING REFUGE
AREA TO REMAIN
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 04/24/12
r'P-V,' 1rF7-
r
�� r r !� r 1070 r-7
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — City Manager's Office
Strategic Planning 2012
Council Goals and Action Plan
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Council:
1. Adopt the goals selected at the Strategic Planning Workshop of February 24,
2012; and,
2. Approve the related action plans implementing Council Goals.
DISCUSSION:
The City Council met at a special meeting on February 24, 2012 to develop goals and
related action plans for the City. The annual Strategic Planning meeting was a success
and involved a great deal of discussion on priority issues. The meeting focused on
continued efforts and refinement for the City's top strategic initiatives and a discussion
of the Council strategy to deal with the elimination of Redevelopment. The minutes of
the meeting are attached. The goals reconfirmed at the meeting were:
1. Pursue Economic Development
2. Enhance Public Safety
3. Stabilize the City's Finances
These goals will continue to form the foundation for the City's work plan. Promotion was
discussed as a specific action item within the Economic Development Goal. The City
Council wanted to maintain and refocus promotion efforts which incorporate tourism. A
list of general promotion issues was developed. Staff has since refined the action plans
to outline the work that will be done as it relates to each goal. Attached are Action
Plans for each goal.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 04/24/12
FISCAL IMPACT:
The two-year budget is based on the goals developed through the strategic planning
process. While there is no direct impact as a result of the approval of this work plan,
future budgets will be based on these goals, and specific projects may require the
expenditure of funds or additional resources.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Pursue Economic Development Action Plan
2. Enhance Public Safety Action Plan
3. Stabilize the City's Finances Action Plan
4. City Council Minutes of February 24, 2012 Strategic Planning Workshop.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
Pursue Economic Development
Action Plan
2012-13
Goals
• Retain and Expand Local Businesses
• Encourage Residents to Shop Locally
• Attract More People to the Community
• Promote the Community and Its Quality of Life
• Develop Focused Tourism Opportunities
• Create Local Jobs
Values
• Spend Time on Good Investments
• Focus on Hot Spots
• Leverage Resources
• Move at a Quick Pace
• Involve Partners
Promote the Community
• Prepare a letter available to be sent to banks, businesses, potential new
businesses, etc. that outlines all of the success the community is enjoying. The
letter will be updated regularly.
• Frequently issue press releases about the community's successes.
• Feature ribbon cuttings and events that showcase progress in the community.
• Prepare a well-designed and informative promotional package for potential
businesses and companies with demographic information, testimonials, economic
graphs, charts, traffic counts, rental comparisons, etc.
• Promote the City's customer service and business friendly attitude on a regional
and statewide basis.
• Participate more actively in meetings with commercial brokers to promote
economic opportunities and the good things happening in Atascadero.
• Create a "Love Atascadero" Campaign where people could sponsor services
provided by the City or provide events or creative/artistic talents on public
property that further contribute to the City's appearance and quality of life.
• Better utilize cable channel 20 to promote the community.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
Continue to Develop Atascadero's Tourism Market
• Implement the Atascadero Tourism Strategy
• Consider joining a neighboring Tourism Business Improvement District. Proceeds
would be used to market hotels, connect to regional marketing activities and
provide support to them during major events.
• Further develop the Atascadero Wine Association and create additional ties
between the community and wineries.
• Remain active in the San Luis Obispo Visitor and Conference Bureau and
cooperate with regional advertising/promotions.
• Leverage efforts of the VCB and the statewide Visit California Campaign.
• Redesign www.VisitAtascadero.com to focus on the components outlined in the
strategy.
• Participate in Savor the Central Coast
• Create distinct hotel packages and cross marketing with regional events.
• Develop a social media presence to develop tourism.
• Create and maintain a tourism master calendar that includes regional events.
Development
• Create an interactive, web-based, visual database of economic development hot
spots to be used by staff and others to assist in locating businesses.
• Conduct a thorough review of the City's streamlined permit process and discover
additional ways to make the process even better and easier for applicants.
• Create a 'best practices" document and other forms to assist people going
through the state's Title 24 energy conservation and calculation process.
Downtown
• Work with Main Street and property owners to highlight and manage parking
opportunities downtown.
• Initiate a campaign to educate customers on where to park downtown which
would include signage, brochures, and slides before movies.
• Coordinate a "Rediscover ECR/41" campaign highlighting the new businesses in
the area. Include specials, a celebration, and future opportunities at Colony
Square.
Existing Projects
Walmart / Annex Project
o FEIR Hearings in June 2012
o Caltrans interchange improvement coordination
o Expedited building permit review process
❑ Eagle Ranch
o Redesign of Project components based on public workshops and
meetings.
ITEM NUMBER: C -2
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
o County Property Tax Negotiations
Commercial Hot Spots
❑ Hoff Property
o Continue to meet with the owners to discuss design and development
alternatives.
o Market the site to potential businesses looking to locate in the community.
❑ Kmart Center
o Continue to meet with center owners and businesses to discuss long term
success of the shopping center.
❑ Home Depot Center
o Continue to aggressively market site for hotel and retail use.
❑ Colony Square
o Market site to potential businesses.
o Continue to investigate and implement additional parking options.
o Work with developers to move forward on additional project phases.
❑ Traffic Way Industrial Area
o Develop initial planning/design for high-tech business park.
o Work with existing businesses to facilitate expansion and modernization.
❑ Morro Road
o Complete work at the new entrance to the zoo.
o Complete the Lake Park frontage improvements.
o Seek tourist oriented businesses for development along Highway 41.
o Implement wayfinding signage along Highway 41.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
Enhance Public Safety
Action Plan
2012-13
Goals
• Enhance Public Safety Services
• Maintain Emergency Preparedness
Values
• Spend Time on Good Investments
• Focus on Hot Spots
• Leverage Resources
• Move at a Quick Pace
• Involve Partners
Emergency Planning
❑ Modernize and maintain an Emergency Operations Center
o Facilitate and participate in Regional Crisis Exercise and EOC Activation
(Annually)
F- Update Hazard Mitigation Plan (Every 5 Years)
I_ Maintain Emergency Operations Plan
Completion of Disaster Response Trailer as donations are available (95%
complete)
Facilitate meetings and training between Fire and Police (Ongoing)
Develop City-wide wildland fuel mapping and pre-fire plans (Winter 2012)
Continue to provide support, training, oversight and governance to the North
County CERT Program (Ongoing)
In conjunction with Community Development and Public Works, Police and Fire
will develop specific requirements for the WalMart project during preconstruction,
construction and project completion.
Technology
❑ Maintain current technology
o Prepare Police, Fire, Public Works, Parks and Transit radio systems for FCC
mandated "Narrow Banding" and evaluate systems (June 2012)
■ Narrow banding is complete.
• Gaps in service have necessitated installation of improved
antennas. Evaluation of the system will be ongoing until June 2012
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
to see if the new antennas corrected the problem.
I Leverage technology solutions to improve core service delivery
o Research cost effective solutions to mobile data computer concerns (Fall
2011)
o Participate in regional initiative to integrate Police Records Management
Systems to improve service delivery (Ongoing)
• Current installations in neighboring agencies have indicated a need
for caution prior to proceeding.
o Enable internet access from mobile data computers (Completed)
o Replace Police in-car video equipment. (Completed)
o Upgrade/Improve Atascadero's 911 system ( 2nd Qtr. 2012)
❑ Solicit partners to share costs at City controlled radio sites (Ongoing)
Training
Maintain appropriate training levels
o Meet State & Federal Training Standards (Ongoing)
• In an effort to stay current with State training mandates the Police
have begun utilizing the Fresno training facility for 'perishable
skills" training.
o Identify training opportunities that increase safety for public safety
employees and reduce liability for the City. (Ongoing)
❑ Investigate grant and outside funding opportunities for training Fire and Police
personnel
o Continue training partnership with Cuesta College Paramedic & EMT
Program (Ongoing)
o Leverage California Peace Officers Association funding whenever available
(Ongoing)
❑ Leverage resources with other agencies
o Police will work with Office of Traffic Safety to continue to provide DUI
enforcement and education in the community (Ongoing)
L Asset Seizure training for Police (2012-2013)
Eagle Ranch
Monitor Eagle Ranch planning process for Public Safety impacts (Ongoing
through 2012)
o Radio Propagation Study and City impacts
o Response plans
o Urban Interface Fire Hazard impacts & risk
o Continue to evaluate the challenges to Police and Fire Deployments
Focus on Core Services
❑ Maintain current Strategic Plans & update as necessary (Ongoing)
L Enhance enforcement through Municipal Code amendments
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
Complete ISO process and present to the Council & public (Spring/Summer
2012)
Revise and automate Police General Orders (Completion-June 2012)
o Minor setback has necessitated the extended date.
Maintain adequate patrol levels (Ongoing)
o Evaluate alternative deployment models with existing staffing levels to
ensure acceptable emergency response times and core service delivery
(Ongoing)
o Monitor workload impact of commercial development
❑ Measure response standards (Ongoing)
o Response times to emergency calls for service
o Queuing of Fire & Police emergencies
0 911 call processing
o Use RMS data, CAD and GIS to evaluate "Hot Spots" for response times
Implement programs for neighborhood impacts and community involvement
o Re-establish Crime Free Multi Housing training (Spring 2012 —
Ongoing)
o Develop Zone Supervision Areas and create a map link to the zone
areas on the City's website (Summer 2012)
o Utilize technology for neighborhood connections through social
media (2012)
o Peace Officer Memorial (May 2012)
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 3
Stabilize the City's Finances
Action Plan
2012-13
Goals
• Maintain a Conservative Budget
• Develop Revenue
• Keep Council and Staff Informed About Financial Condition
• Maintain a Strong Finance Team
• Oppose State Takeaways
• Manage Reserves
Values
• Spend Time on Good Investments
• Focus on Hot Spots
• Leverage Resources
• Move at a Quick Pace
• Involve Partners
Budget
❑ Maintain Council budget policies (Ongoing)
❑ Insure appropriate fees and subsidy policies (Ongoing)
❑ Identify positive opportunities (Ongoing)
Balance the Budget with increased revenues, reduced expenditures and reserves
(Ongoing)
❑ Maximize use of grants and alternative funding sources as appropriate (Ongoing)
❑ Minimize operating and capital project costs when appropriate (Ongoing)
Continue Economic Development
This goal is addressed under the previous action plan, "Pursue Economic
Development."
Implement a More Expansive Volunteer Program
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 3
Continue current successful volunteer programs in the Police Department, Zoo
and other departments (Ongoing)
Implement expanded volunteer program (Ongoing)
Continue Monitoring and Reporting of Financial Information on a Regular
Basis
❑ Current reporting levels are appropriate.
❑ Provide a mid-cycle budget update to the City Council. (July 2012)
❑ Provide routine financial reports to the City Council on a quarterly basis
(February, May, August, and November). (Ongoing)
❑ Provide bi-weekly expenditure reports to department heads to track expenses.
(Ongoing)
Conduct monthly budget meetings with department heads to review expenses of
the previous month. (Ongoing)
❑ Provide monthly disbursement reports to the City Council. (Ongoing)
❑ Provide detailed investment reports to the City Council on a quarterly basis.
(Ongoing)
❑ Provide timely updates to the City Council if there are material changes to
revenues, expenses or the City's financial outlook. (Ongoing)
Provide regular updates to Council and community through City Manager news
articles (Ongoing)
Continue Effective Fiscal Stewardship in the Local and State Environments
Monitor State Budget implementation. (Ongoing)
Continue engaging in legislative lobbying concerning the State budget (Ongoing)
L Reach out to community organizations for awareness of issues; make them
effective coalition partners (Ongoing)
❑ Educate the public; engage them when appropriate (Ongoing)
❑ Maintain informed and well-trained staff (Ongoing)
❑ Monitor and evaluate local, State, and national economy for trends (Ongoing)
❑ Coordinate with County and State officials to meet all requirements related to the
dissolution of Redevelopment and operation of newly formed Successor Agency
(Ongoing)
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 4
Approved March 13, 2012
Strong Council, Strong Staff, Strong City
Atascadero City Council
Strategic Planning 2012
Friday, February 24, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.
City Hall — Council Chambers
6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero
MINUTES
Friday 9:00 a.m.
Li Call the meeting to order and Welcome — Mayor
Mayor Kelley called the meeting to order at 9:03 a.m. and welcomed everyone to this
Special Session of the City Council to conduct Strategic Planning.
Minutes - City Council Strategic Planning Workshop
February 24, 2012
Page 1 of 8
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 4
Approved March 13, 2012
Present: Council Members Clay, Fonzi, Sturtevant, Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley
and Mayor Kelley
Absent: None
Others Present: City Clerk / Assistant to City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson
Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manager Jim Lewis,
Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard, Community
Development Director Warren Frace, Public Works Director Russ
Thompson, Community Services Director Brady Cherry, Police
Chief Jerel Haley, Fire Chief Kurt Stone, City Attorney Brian Pierik,
and Administrative Assistant Lisa Cava.
Li PUBLIC COMMENT — Sue Warren
Li Purpose of the Workshop
• Review and prioritize financial condition, programs and projects
• Review priorities for 2011-13
• Continue to build trust and improve working relationships
• Review specific Council policies
• Have Fun!
City Manager Wade McKinney explained about the process for this meeting, and that
to allow more time for the discussion of the issues facing the City, we were going to
forego the Exercise.
Li Exercise "Win All You Can"
This exercise was withdrawn from the agenda.
Li Getting Started
Mr. McKinney reviewed the ground rules for this Workshop:
• Be open, share, and listen.
Minutes - City Council Strategic Planning Workshop
February 24, 2012
Page 2 of 8
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 4
Approved March 13, 2012
• Risk new ideas,
• Problem solving v. blame fixing
• Share responsibility for results
• Be positive — humor
• Have fun
The City Council worked through an exercise where they discussed Building Trust and
Respect between Council Members and between Council Members and Staff. The
Council identified the following actions which build or take away from Trust, Respect
and Teamwork.
What develops Trust?
Between City Council Members: Between City Council Members and
• Trying to understand Staff:
• Camaraderie • Don't blindside
• Socializing • Work through City Manager
• Compromising • Openness/honest
• Forget/forgive/move on • Clear expectations
• No micro-managing
• "wearing same uniforms"
• Being positive in public
• Follow-through
• Constant communication
• Predictability
• Trust others to do the right thing
What takes away from Trust?
Between City Council Members: Between City Council Members and
• Lack of communication (Brown Staff:
Act) • Not following chain of command
• Bickering/being "small" • Hallway huddles
• Rumors • Inconsistent messages
• Personal agendas • Lack of information
• Jealousy • Need context for questions
• Let us see you coming
What develops Respect?
• Shared goals
Between City Council Members: • Everyone working together
Minutes - City Council Strategic Planning Workshop
February 24, 2012
Page 3 of 8
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 4
Approved March 13, 2012
• Clear expectations Between City Council Members and
• Equality Staff:
• Admiration • Clear questions
• Doing what they say • Understanding needs
• Active listening • Share credit
• Walk the talk • Trust Council's priorities
• Work through cm
• No blindsiding
• Get questions early
What detracts from Respect?
Between City Council Members: Between City Council Members and
• Big egos Staff:
• Doing something different than • Arrogance
what they say • Suspicion
• Personal agendas • Being dismissive
• Dishonesty • Lack of feedback
• Not listening to all sides
• False perceptions
What develops Teamwork?
• Delegate
Between City Council Members: . Best team ever— character, trust,
• Common goals care
• Pulling in the same direction . More updates on committees —
• CM treating Council Members distribute notes.
equally
• Trust
• Respect
• Working through issues
• Appreciate differences & skills
• Optimism
Between City Council Members and
Staff:
• Common goals
• Clear expectations
• Support
• Team work #1
• Recognize skills
• Confidence in others
Minutes - City Council Strategic Planning Workshop
February 24, 2012
Page 4 of 8
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 4
Approved March 13, 2012
What takes away from Teamwork?
Between City Council Members:
• One person cowboys
• Controversy
• Non-acceptance of decisions
• Poor communication
• Losing sight of goals
❑ Review 2011-13 process
The City Council reviewed their 2011-2013 goals and briefly discussed the City's
successes on working towards those goals:
• Grow the City's Economy and Pursue Economic Development
• Enhance Public Safety
• Stabilize the City's Finances
❑ Strategic Discussion
The City Council reviewed the General Fund financial condition and underlying
assumptions. The Council determined that a targeted promotion effort would lead to
more revenue and agreed to increase the revenue projections by $44,000 (equal to
1% of TOT) to be used for promotions. The Council provided the following comments
as a definition for promotions:
❑ Promoting City of Atascadero
❑ Advertising
❑ Promote Atascadero lifestyle
❑ Promote events
❑ Target business events
❑ Have mini-conventions
❑ Identify and expand venues
❑ Expand & package events for multiple days/nights & activities
❑ Promote Atascadero as HUB
❑ Develop business events
❑ Share information
❑ Invest in portable resources
❑ Make use of/hold events in Stadium Park
❑ Identify & promote venue options/create event-venue spreadsheet/handout
❑ Utilize Channel 20
❑ Branding
Minutes - City Council Strategic Planning Workshop
February 24, 2012
Page 5 of 8
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 4
Approved March 13, 2012
❑ Work with schools on sporting events/competitions
❑ Softball/basketball tourneys
❑ Develop mobile apps
❑ Develop promotional materials
❑ Promote interconnection between business types
❑ Encourage area-wide value nights
❑ Encourage the Daffodil Program
The City Council next reviewed the existing Redevelopment Projects, prioritized them
to be initiated as the City's budget will allow:
1. Downtown Parking
2. Downtown Pedestrian Bridge (bridge only)
3. City Hall Parking Lot
4. Sunken Gardens Electrical Upgrade
5. Wayfinding
6. Archway Sign/Banner
❑ Public Comment — Karyn Sturtevant
Mayor Kelley adjourned the meeting for lunch at 12:00 p.m.
Mayor Kelley resumed the meeting at 12:30 p.m.
❑ Council Issues
• Eagle Ranch
o Not happy with progress
There was Council consensus that if the County is not interested in working
with the City, we are in no rush to approve.
• ADA
o Stay ahead of the curve — Be proactive
• Asset Acquisition
o Investigating
• Centennial Vision
o Community Event
Minutes - City Council Strategic Planning Workshop
February 24, 2012
Page 6 of 8
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 4
Approved March 13, 2012
• City finances
o Keep public informed with news articles from the City Manager
• County Environmental Directives
o Find the loopholes
o Work towards local control
• Development projects
o Already discussed
• Economy
o Already discussed
• Elimination of RDA
o Already discussed
• Fourth of July Event
o No support for Council sanction
• Gangs
o Will discuss at City/School Committee meeting
• Local Control, (countywide agencies, Property Tax)
o Philosophical position
• Parking
o OED will review options and return to Council
• Plastic Bags — advisory ballot
o No support
• Public Safety
o Already discussed
• Remote Caller Bingo
o Process application
• Road Improvements — '/z cent sales tax?
o Maybe in 2014
• Tourism
o Let's call this Promotion and Marketing
o Top priority
• Zoo funding
o Re-direct the Zoo Society to focus on donations
o Council supports the Zoo
Li Public Comment - Al Fonzi
There was Council consensus to direct staff to prepare a thank you letter
to the Vetter Estate for their Zoo donation.
There was Council consensus to make it the Mayor's prerogative
to decide how Public Comment will be handled.
Minutes - City Council Strategic Planning Workshop
February 24, 2012
Page 7 of 8
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 4
Approved March 13, 2012
Li Review Council Norms
The Council reviewed their Norms and made a few updates. They included language
to get better reporting on Regional Boards and eliminated the periodic meeting with
Commission Chairs.
Li Next steps and burning issues list
The City Council then reviewed issues raised during the day which were:
• No. County Homeless — System of Care.
o Continue to monitor.
• Council Information.
o Council Members and Staff members need to continue to provide each
other information and feedback.
• ICSC relationships/conference.
o Continue our involvement.
• Hot Spot Design Assistance.
o Use the material we have already developed.
o Maintain as a priority, don't spend more money.
• "Turbocharge" Promotion for Community/Funding.
o Explained above.
• Downtown letter about service reductions/positive tone.
o Develop a letter to downtown businesses about the impacts of RDA and
the City's commitment.
• Keep public updated on City Finances
Public Comment — Linda Hendy
Li Celebrate!
The City Council and Staff concluded the meeting with positive comments about the
work accomplished and the strength of the Council/Staff team.
Kelley adjourned the meeting at 3:30 p.m.
MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C.
City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager
Minutes - City Council Strategic Planning Workshop
February 24, 2012
Page 8 of 8
ITEM NUMBER: C - 3
DATE: 04/24/12
(XQ ,,1979
t
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — City Manager's Office
Downtown Parking Opportunities and
Parking Information Campaign
RECOMMENDATION:
Council provide feedback on proposed downtown parking opportunities and the "Park
Here!" campaign.
DISCUSSION:
Atascadero has long planned and worked towards creating a downtown that is the
social, cultural and entertainment hub of the community. For years the City has worked
with developers, property owners, the Main Street Association and the citizenry to attain
this goal. Several things have occurred in recent years to make this goal a reality. The
City has invested in the downtown area through public improvements such as
streetscape improvements, the construction of Lewis Avenue Bridge, and improvements
to lighting and the Sunken Gardens. Additionally, the City guaranteed the construction
loan for Colony Square resulting in a new movie theater and restaurants for the
community and also funded an aggressive downtown stimulus program resulting in
more attractive signs and storefronts downtown. Main Street working with business
owners, has created several new events in the area including the Art and Wine Tour,
and Valentine's Day and Halloween festivities.
As a result of these investments, the private sector has responded and several new
restaurants, galleries and shops have opened. Business has increased downtown and
more people are spending time and money there, particularly around the Carlton area
and at Colony Square. With this success, parking, particularly near these areas, is
becoming more difficult to find during peak times. Access to parking is essential for
continued economic growth in the downtown area. This report outlines options and
strategies for making the most of the downtown parking inventory and outlines a public
education campaign.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 3
DATE: 04/24/12
In 2006, the City conducted a parking study for downtown. The study included several
strategies, several of which have been implemented. Staff has reviewed the study and
had discussions with several downtown businesses and property owners about
additional actions that can be taken. Strategies have been identified as ones that can
be implemented in the short-term, intermediate-term and long term.
SHORT-TERM
• Conduct a facilitated meeting with downtown business and property owners to
discuss shared parking, employee parking, parking opportunities etc. A meeting
was promoted by the Main Street Association and conducted on April 23rd. The
details and results of this meeting will be discussed this evening.
• Encourage business owners to send a memo to employees designating
employee parking areas on public streets away from the downtown core
(examples could be Olmeda, Lewis Avenue, East and West Mall).
• Obtain temporary approval to use private lots in vacant areas (Jack and the Box,
Hoovers, etc.) for employee and additional customer parking.
• Obtain voluntary property owner consent to use private parking in the rear of
businesses for public parking.
• Work with Bank of America to try to obtain shared parking with theater. Potential
advertising as incentive at theater.
• Develop temporary sandwich boards ("overflow theater parking", "employee
parking", etc.) to direct people into auxiliary parking lots. Signs would be put up
only during times of peak demand and taken down at end of evening. Signs
would be placed and kept by private businesses (Galaxy, Colby Jack, etc.)
INTERMEDIATE TERM
• Restripe portions of EI Camino Real through downtown (need funding source).
• Designate/identify additional parking opportunities at Colony Square?
LONG TERM
• Restripe West Mall, designate as a one way street (need funding source).
• Parking opportunity on the Hoff Property across from the Sunken Garden/West
Mall.
• City Hall/Administration Building parking lot becomes available again.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 3
DATE: 04/24/12
FISCAL IMPACT:
Certain projects may incur cost and a funding source would need to be identified on a
project by project basis.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
ITEM NUMBER: C -4
DATE: 04/24/12
A tascadero Planning Commission
Staff Report — Community Development Department
Housing Element
Annual Progress Report 2011
(PLN 2006-1133)
RECOMMENDATION:
Council direct staff to submit the attached 2011 Housing Element Annual Progress
Report to the State of California.
DISCUSSION:
Background: The State of California requires all cities to file an Annual Housing
Element Progress Report to the Department of Housing and Community Development
(HCD). The purpose of the Housing Report is to monitor the implementation of the City's
General Plan Housing Element and progress toward meeting the City's Regional
Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). The allocations are targets for the production of
affordable housing for various income groups throughout the City.
Table 1
State of California Income Level Definitions
Very Low Income Lower Income Moderate Income Above Moderate
50% of County 80% of County 120% of County Greater than 120% of
Median Median Median County Median
San Luis Obispo County Median Income for a Family of Four(4):$72,500 for 2010
These regional housing allocations are required to be used by the City when updating
the housing element. They are the basis for assuring that adequate sites and zoning are
available to accommodate at least the number of units allocated. These housing
allocation numbers are not housing unit quotas that the City must achieve within the
ITEM NUMBER: C -4
DATE: 04/24/12
time frame of their next housing element update, but housing targets that the City must
provide zoning for and reduce obstacles to development.
City Staff and its consultants have updated the City's Housing Element. This updated
housing element was approved by the City Council in early 2011 and was certified by
HCD in the spring of 2011. The housing programs progress report from the Housing
Element is included as an attachment.
Analysis: For 2011, the City issued building permits on 29 new residential units. Table 2
shows the breakdown of new residential units for 2011 that were issued by income type.
Table 2
2011 New Residential Housing Units Building Permits Issued
Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate Total
Permitted Units Issued 0 0 15 11 26
r4
c Secondary Units Issued 0 1 1 1 3
N
Total 0 1 16 12 29
The current allocation sets housing needs for a seven year period ending in 2014. As of
December 31, 2011, Atascadero had met approximately 55% of its total housing
allocation. Table 3 shows the percentage that the City has met for each income
category for the 2007-2014 reporting period. These percentages only reflect units that
have been issued a building permit and do not reflect entitled units or the units from the
various projects that have been approved. Table 4 provides a breakdown of total units
produced for the 2007-2014 reporting period.
Table 3
RHNA Totals By Percentage 2007-2014
Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate Total
Percentage of Target Goal 13% 14% 30% 83%
Total Units Issued 8 10 26 162 206
ITEM NUMBER: C -4
DATE: 04/24/12
Table 4
2007-2014 Atascadero Share of Re ional Housing Need (RHNA)
Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate Total
2007-2014 Reporting Period Totals 106 i•1 88 196 4o2
Permitted Units Issued ? 0 121
r,
c Secondary Units Issued 0 2 0 1 1
N
Subtota! 2 2 -- --
ao
Permitted Units Issued 4 0
g Secondary Units Issued 0 4
~ Subtota! 0 J _'
Permitted Units Issued 0 0 0 i
Secondary Units Issued 0 0 3 I 1
N
Subtotal C 0 3
Permitted Units Issued 0 0 i=
o -
o Secondary Units Issued G 1 1
N
Subtotal 2 0 1 _
ri
Permitted Units Issued 0 15 .1 h
c Secondary Units Issued 0 1 1 1
N
Subtota! C to _-
Toro!Un rs!slued 2007-2011 8 1 26
Remain lne RHHA 98 b-11 62 32 25u
Over the last year there have been many inquiries regarding the purchase of lots within
some of the City's larger approved projects including Las Lomas (Woodridge) for both
the single-family and multi-family lots, and West Front Village. Of the 29 total units
issued, 15 of these issued units were a part of the Dove Creek development. Staff also
finaled permits in developments including West Front Village, Regio Place, and the
Villas at Montecito. Many of these large scale projects halted construction activities in
2008 due to the significant tightening of credit and capital, and the downturn of the
housing market. These larger projects include affordable housing production
requirements as a part of their conditions of approval. As a result of the City's dormant
permit program, construction of these projects have restarted quickly.
In addition to some of the larger developments, other smaller developments have been
picked up out of foreclosure. Most notably, Oak Grove Phase II off of EI Camino Real
was purchased by People's Self Help Housing, which in turn plans to complete the
entire project for a variety of very low, low and moderate income levels. Some of these
projects have gone before the Planning Commission for amendments to entitlements.
Staff expects other larger previously approved projects may also require amendments
to their approved plans for various reasons.
2011 Affordable Housing Production
Calendar year 2011 saw an increase in building production by 123% versus 2010. The
increase in housing production is welcomed news for our local economy and is a
ITEM NUMBER: C -4
DATE: 04/24/12
continued positive sign of a slowly improving economy as production ramps up and
demand for new housing continues to increase.
The City issued 29 residential building permits for new housing unit construction. Of the
total building permits issued, a total of 18 units were considered affordable. The majority
of these affordable units were located in the Dove Creek development. All permits that
were issued at Dove Creek in 2011 have sales prices that fall below the "moderate"
income group maximum sales price for both 3 bedroom and 4 bedroom units
established by San Luis Obispo's County's Previously Approved Project Formula (July
2011 Formula for consistency with 2011 July RHNA income limits). As of February 24,
2012, the Dove Creek Community Sales Manager verified that six (6) of the 2011 issued
housing permits have already been sold with sales prices below the County's maximum
sales price for moderate income units.
Additionally, one (1) second unit is considered affordable for the moderate income level
group and one (1) second unit is considered affordable for the low income level group.
These groups are defined as "affordable" if the cost per square foot for a typical rent in
Atascadero ($1.09/sf based on the San Luis Obispo Multi-Family Housing Rental
Survey) multiplied by the square footage of the second unit. If the rent falls within an
income category, that unit is deemed affordable for that income type.
The median home price in Atascadero for a new or existing home or condo in 2011
according the California Realtors Association was $309,200. This median home price
still gives the ability for moderate income wage earners to become homeowners for the
first time in many years. Median home price is expected to increase slightly or remain
flat for 2012, and the affordability for new or existing homes remains high for the City.
Dissolution of the Atascadero Redevelopment Agency
The Atascadero Redevelopment Agency was formally dissolved on February 1 , 2012,
consistent with AB 1x 26 as upheld by the State Supreme Court. The City has yet to
receive information regarding if and when it can utilize the existing RDA Housing set
aside funds that had accumulated prior to the dissolution of the Agency.
In 2011 , the RDA selected five (5) projects to move forward with funding various
aspects of these projects. At this time this funding is on hold. In addition, some of the
Housing Element programs that were tied to RDA funding utilize either the housing set
aside fund, or other funding mechanism that the RDA provided to fund affordable
housing both within the boundaries of the RDA and outside of the project area. These
programs are listed as "suspended" in the annual progress report that will be submitted
to HCD. With the dissolution of the RDA, the City lost a key financial mechanism that
provided grants, loans, and matching funds in helping to achieve goals of RHNA for the
2007-2014 reporting year.
Conclusion: The City expects an increase in the number of issued permits for 2012.
Currently, staff is working with developers at Las Lomas for both the multi-family portion
ITEM NUMBER: C -4
DATE: 04/24/12
and single-family portion, and People's Self-Help Housing who expect to commence
construction in 2012. Developers at Dove Creek have expressed to staff that
constructed units are selling well and indicate that more units will be pulled this year for
the townhomes and cottages. Staff will continue to work with these developers, lot
owners, and other seeking to jump start previously approved projects, as well as verify
sales prices for the larger developments to ensure that the City is credited for affordable
units if sales prices remain below the County's maximum sales prices established for
affordable housing.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1 2011 Housing Element Annual Progress Report Submittal to HCD
2 2011 RHNA Income Limits
3 2011 San Luis Obispo County Previously Approved Project Formula
ITEM NUMBER: C -4
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
ATTACHMENT 1: 2011 Housing Element Annual Progress Report Submittal to HCD
Att.trhrrwnt t
ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
;CCR Tale:S 5620: i
Jurisdiction I:IVdAIAWa6vo
Rove"Ing Period ;6" 2014
Table A
Annual sullding Actk+Ry Repod 9mmmy-New Con+ttuchon
Very Low.,Low-,and Msed4ncome Multitarmy Pro)ird
II..... M.A r.M
Nwwlw�tiww•,t,w,rw r•M,111�eM .r.,. �..�x.i i w IM,MI OnrO
t•r...l l..a� ..�n. �•i 1.r�.11�..��.MOM
AM•ebMrrcwwArrr.w.u�ww. Wrp T»e„ a..rTaraAitidA
bY>wre l•r.Mw t•Mr P,MP we leen.,., MwrM,•rYYe eAt•r1.�1Y
tmry Ye At NO LAIN n•INM W bAl `w l rwreN r•relr•Ir•w•d
r4bit WW N C�Lr are•y. wry 1 r Iv. MMeI.M Nn.. ..H' h.reryl,ele Irl,w eY/rMoewPr
M.•. �..M IM��rrrMre•r,rM wM
do"" (rMrr Iowa IwrwM. No"ON lllwY an
•+Iw eW r/e�uNrr1
M�h•tr
No rh1'
a nn
r—
vimporo• tir rr►
Oars C1w0 KA, la O 7 1Wa1t waq 06000
ianay d 1aAmq nwe"
Ipmry
Oa+Creo 9F 0 17 12 �OMd
aRar�ntla nwrnp
Prwm
a Mn 43"d utwat) Su a 1 2 sm aantt suY.y
ItrlTatl nit+t•MaoaaMaewaMrMMti•r+TNA7 f Is
IA tenwrwrwtr'.-+�du ► t to 13 .19
t11)Te1rl errrw eit le4Meew••11$
*No* Thow Iw)w o•Yu4M/y
ITEM NUMBER: C -4
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
Obis" 1
Mr�ws
ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implelrrentatlon
t4CR INie 115W102i
Jurisdiction Qry or At"40 rO
Ro"ding P•rlod 200? ]ot•i
Table Al
A twuAI Buildlncj Activity Report Summary-hilts Rehabdit.Me d,Ptesetvell and Acgtrted plrlsu•W
to GC Section 65583 11(m 1)
Ir.-ntN I hN.1.1 Wr IM rr.aM11•M,11doo"W"Wh-•/I MACW M�r�nulwl•►�p•A I N Iq w�NMwrI N r�/�pI�N•�1wM•rr�r NNtfr r/q�
I.al.r Bolo 4044'..1 A MVrAM• 011tM.6W l Ii1x1I
14114',4d"1 lit M.•-.r1•I—.
AN.1t lw• earl 9 111114 i1.�rp1o•MVW.dMµlYlr dltlMrMl�are.•rA rM1<wglr..rNr
lir "Nttw MGwwmrwltr[nM YwaInNMI1
maxims• I
1."" lwww
IlrWhole a.mnAsl.•q u n
(Mptgk .Nw M ter at 416 4 n
171A.gwb.ndlin► u u u �.
Al NO tM•►t 1---
t• this now 16 vaulwly
Table AJ
Annual building Activity Report Summary lot Above MWerabdincom Lk*s
(nol including those unds reported on TAW&A)
of
bingo family 2•A Left Units 7ocond Ural Mobil.Ibm.• f.. Mirnb.r
Infl II uNh
r. N ltv+C6r rrelpA t•-. 12 2 0 1 0 0
Neeaas
� r!l.hh rrMRRiwt I•J 1. 11 r 1
Abve YeMrere
'ticks This now Is rt41114"
ITEM NUMBER: C -4
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
,CCR Tf le 25 §6_01
Junsdlcbon COatAINCedw
Rtpodmg Period 2OD7 2014
Table B
Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress
Pormittod Units Issutd by AQordlWYty
Embfcwneurow 0640ywe,mefell Tow of 2007 ;(r. JtO 2011 ?1:
w.QfocA wousoa rwr S«E.wroo I I i I 201J 7{)11
is1o1 t1rts Ts1a1
P"t" U DW Rsr►M"W i.
becomes,I. b. yew roof ro, 140 yea Yew V40 Tow ar
(601*&*) bylawL&•
? S 6 T E
R�W�tIN a u ? 0 s
NhC�+r M1w�
ort
�ierslN 0 0 0 0 0
Deed 0 0 0 0
tPi Nonro.d >4 9 0 0 0 1 p
rtindN
0 0 0 0 0
ibOyrfn QM1tfK ,� _,
on 7 r t6 �(
rgUtlN
` 191 121 t
a42
bsloe oui...:... .�..•t, 1y1 ',? a :9
Mob r.w oof.Wq**WWII kpw a cant hoo"60%we wffuMs in 11W very 10w WWC4W rnorsN uMa 12-
ITEM NUMBER: C -4
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housb►Q Element Implementation
.ful.a.n..,
Civ ditwo Nr.
N.nnrt1•,y h.r..A � JIIII! .
IAble C
Pruptum Im{dernelllo0on 9telu40
f•rn)an Dw�n1.r. Mas.Iny r-uW.nr.rrTu•I Now•Nwermwl0aMNwor111NN,
Ith t.—1 2L.nr -�++•i$1.• •' ••.II.Nlf la n.nM1.y);n Mn1MI11A.nMVfnl.In Mnfflll.Mn1•
N12,IwEn.ilA .rq ►•:.I,+,.r. ":t.ary��d.Mf114$I Irl r.Alrrq.►rrou
Nm.N r,�,�„r.. '•,01101)1040 ^ � ouYM o1►flr�w�11g140Inwalrlwl
.. rN....,r.1.11M,i1n.Ia PI.1 ant N.iunPp'.•.Mlalta 111M
.tiro aarylwa oats*A.”►i.ono w-41'f *We!&M a
II IIIh RI dIn1NMl11.•• .Iwa,o.0111.401•X:0'11..•
r�ill ra 200.0"d-ft 00 fu'.IN W IwPWI r
Iv01."a1.R/Ma(>t1ot..', p/1ia f1,>.Io 11M P.11NI V�1hM f/f[1o{Tf/y so(11NI)IMI Ca'lJ♦Mh
WWII fonts AI Inafl w(1p f.W aN)M ln.W Na{Vara
'.I Mr0101UM1a roof•rfr p aISA of Me n-morl; - I
i•Inn
%a 01.1 M4""low n,•....
1•J Nwla ow"Ma.Ie- ,Am 011)$1 WM N ct.•• '"MT n.w140.c 1".$1.1.12.+4,W411•)•140 PIP W aara1011a
1�f-71111 INIMA - O a Karl of the%A s"-.Apia F sovoc11
- raA Impnha(+•p•40luflwf
s r 01•Ih aw P.
Nr-4144.12 d 11)01"b"Well NA ,Wts we c'mW ou Q..V!rA,pW.
1,7{.a1MIwaM Pp.Iw�IJKlufMi ���h .1)IM7 Ia M1Ah.hY11E u1nl n/r.MN.�iaJA
N[a11011Aana(�11/,N"Vrrlp
•r S,ror.r M M.n fla,M,I ry Ml t..wlrlrny Mi UI.•f.,.yp.r1+$h1.?a{N Rwn h
I n/r.l Ymv.lu,1 ict 01 WM► A Plo z b•W,—A.•.1 ala lha W.d..Aw600 laf..6fAv
.• .InPIPttM pIIMhMUf arts
..M+Iwy wan oW evc6la d 11.,:94frq 1.4.a1.P 40-1 w
ilal.awp AaunmHrw h1.ma m.rnah".ens tl r/.
•r.....a....i�.r.,r.� 'n Into
GAN A..avyrA M.
i :i':!.'.r u1.-1 1 .'. rJiri •'AI4M40Wa la Nll lal,ap.u..J IZ I.f,Irl7r kax,.l-Wr
1140 Mato heWMrWY Aims +'aa ,'"11110401 soon■a11+1114WevRl
.. ...r .SIJ eolse11aa0al+eyafalarll•p1.M.eaU.e.rll40aa t,1.
��al n nn nee d,.ro 111e A.ubr.n N r1.■MC•h
n•,M40rIqIln,Nq{.44y I.1M1w7 :.}� .. Arla'a1l.aa{n40lfe lr rv.r01s.l.w•1 hru.. . . 710
•.viNM.ha40&oVi Ih..M vLIM NM.hI••. F
WWI moll rplea.y16
I I t7 A"MI wra,.rrv10 hwq lU.nt40 '
11sPn.a
1•I!upsonp 2n�1a1 li.Y,a". An waa },I) m ma la,l,en:e
r.ne5+',xU.'rW
�yr1 1 14 Mo1M,ran,. NA On'pItno +anal n:•nM1U.,.r1..wprylroplhr.Mdllnl•NMInw
p...R.M ma.4w.
sm NA lrla ••hs m tap,"u%W"mu,flan_1
'wft • •.vm4hv Mew G,wWalom Pm. 2wpP.
wIPN.I,•hlst.Mn ecm gtftM III IM/ cm-'pooIY,Pp111M I.p1111gp P~faP hNfl.ar.inlr�dl.•l
., r me unto r,O a.lAlu N uM.1"lr p,1.,.•I..r•.
.�.f nwnum
ITEM NUMBER: C -4
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
C::R'a*
Jv,eicter
Ibve"►re e
Table C
Pragtum bapienatat n SUtus
Aqw—Dspov"t • xrvpDO YrvweaeNevwr Ga,er./eAC1/sfetlone00la
�}������ a,eairaf L,tAfi al a{(IID�fr'ir✓rFR�xiQ!n4f L'1i•_w y�p�TOfli y aailYi t:t.�^WgN.i1i�
:.�^re r-7^r.e��c*tirt!•.ur.:c.±rM►±t72'<��._ir.�w+�wr
�eerh�r oil dN r sma of e,eg. nroe..wettben
17 IV 30 OWD aw-kvom lq�%09
7ete�i,l4
SJ v es r
1 r H=aeM.wrt+.tJra!w Seen t VA Y_)y, <agrti tacwarma.00me:,e.uf ti.onporN_Ys:
'e�et'O:dY Wvf `rn4
1 r ry AmsrQ 1hr ssfrq ol.ao to 'o<Z*ntmdeeme."son*tweartE b R1if-Za e
OSM etarrrte4Oerrie b nWaw IVA --,Jag p efeteefr%Gdmt TR►CN AM rel Is tow
ensftoarm us" -[mr-OrmttedPAC-wfsrafft
r rryT.,otlsyeeyertwww r
311E Zww we rap
-�es.et to caster a ea altar•
2t I -W&b&- �!Md3r yy.MC1p efeINCPMrs1thYJir,w-
how",feaal DOURO nrsi - ;st• -c;00 ti d1tzM K T%e ws:vMV@ ID"09 Nt le
CY,c.9r u,r.•y_.,a 1 -"a•wi. - • t"'�a ryepr!+1
=er'f&^A-a lSF."tik r kr4+712 sKsafa X owo
7 2 AiacsY Aron e:+�i�j:;rtn� _ •a�JKv� tM:�rfeua:r y he ic4aa wM OF.,�.a:f.�:
w a6At tar 0"41 WA -611 ac rM'l•nf t+*`,Af*e,rn t 7 J;wM V*CKV1#smQ
a ftnezrq Wet
r.S!Cfree.ae It 34":a s's"A d MelOfee"06V"w.rs
2 1 S fMawl aAr+3ws O: . r.064W MM.M l nstWVJ C-V%M 5L3 Gl004 tieu"
-nyA
S 2 1 CA/e�a 70. i.VRI nr:.r c,x WA we cptdw W arstan tt+a aster ZLro o ywrw i+:
WNW --aeG etc Odom U0et7t
212 unmew G15 vuswo d Ilse e:y cs ww"b/cats GtS llse a wgsra b rem c
t•">tfr��1!!) IOA irQt ea!seen
)1IF"PWJ eMMWAsfll r,owl tnOaeG to,rme.eeW a+eeRVOM wulba.►x,marc mMt
sawnew Lilep ba=s WA ��' a aC drernr•es m":oe.eerts:r'aa we.ra
GEM,
)r:Essay Coww"Wo 040""t IVA tw-ai, _'afts 0"Cak a OA4rr to merea,w-.as tfta:snag.
'7sY@
r�--
f•J T1*2e aaprl m WA 4"M ,.awe+eeb tie/arae.d tt.l.vae'e Orel ttowe 9.w
2/s AS 3t I fro, SOA °"tots"am C.M.felprs,M do b army""(-btc
+/16.71+))=Acer eelu')b((•3h�fMrfS
d[S6Ztat a Mei :ee�b c:earw:3:Mr:.ena6 try:tf`M w P`Otu to%-a'.
�te
+te. eTaftl)1►i `�'�� ,v h%Twit pnpbwm — i
ITEM NUMBER: C -4
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementalion
i CCR Too 25 WV.
Re94nrnry P1rHe W :014
TAW@C
ftWom Impl111na17lallon SlAlus
1�..r}�■� t r..,.,[n._ Hwwq►r.W rin#rev."Resort 6evowmer"GM NNdn NMJ
1[y.IrM4nq F+.nslnt PmglaR NI`■.I Cult•t1 Orol/sa it 41;wWmn r%4u411C LcA[n.1 w11,M te-Wr ome COMIt"tlrl 10 m.�nrnl.nrrnr
1-pn..w•nM an}r}w4Vp t of 1,. -4 44 hW-Woed 11 Or.Aa,eny.rM-ef
Nltwr M fveyrw OreaOw Tie1 Nifa ft"of pmwm 1motowa~
In/ 111.*'MM:1•I:.�,.�'., ry4 yr�,� •�"ub.[ticanlrarsR�wak■InkrtnrwW+oahardrtlawll'
rt NMno.a Ifif p41/rrn
-.'1fr ..1MIWM NYufp1►I OJINr(1�r./i ,
1 1!frr■IMIII 1:s1.IM11/r4 WA �Q•11O "r:rrYnro Meth VaI.Ish Ine I.ar NI nna. '.v I ' ..
rtnd rni rare%cd lah It•el"Iepf rrudwWgp,ws
'wdfN w•pam"W Otn•NOW.tcAruold-
4 1 A 98 J C440100144, W JOIJ .Rv 71a1 Inlleed a wp0sed 4w oon psolm d Mn unlH.1*-
:alh'fct•1 W+how drs to Vs dl[r041ta11 at IIIf RDA
4 11 ACIA Cn11Cllmf..Wn Z-,W.rn. gelp "W.SAaf Carl I1Y.a to t nn"IMM AOA IMNI"IM nes.r1•
•yA qp
l3ua,brp 0011sn ano.ct er r.1q,Ara-y Atalny pa'[le
Men AC[.Tfn.]fKn[ .Ir r r
1's NhYYn W t •yA I01) _.elOwlI-
4}1 re Y W.Qtry.ts s-votom 04 1 nwk 7y4,I0e04l.net tvn tau-04.1 4+b W1r dssnMml cl Ae'
In:'.ne hnWrhn f !uM■ Mwptwvle) ar.Mk lr4 ON Owe r^Wg A OLOM ro.=artr...tt.r W.9
fn1 adlnn nn wen w.wte.d aue b In.dltlt►smr d ale
41 I L.vMspl Redeod.ottolt r ondl 411 unh Irrt+nd.11 'Ns t1 Yp'1Wn gr1l brCrntnue4:nc.Alslmay.et1 Qty 0•.
Ins tWrr Ce Ihr ClY►1tul.lp qt noms tW4
•Mfrr.)er•nae teen ouvetw r4 Ile.Mthe deMe411oh r4 Orn
4$1Hnwwp 11/flebelMAn.uhds Mones .u•l••Ide.l '+I1I.ovor•n1At to!Mlrued ane dgdMtn s pwlr Q•l tp-•ar-
n the tuRo v•Y the C Cr t I*Nvog so eM It/•t
4 14 a/k:IdaQY►IoukfW M41�1WM1n •"'.'"dr w11.,1,QrN.6.1 utlCr W+-.res;Wrt to wa4a1.IRI dtU
(-.046641 'Y. .,,nO I�uwlp t1rM•K Iur MM p41.rfM Ila,f.Nl ynO Oral mp Ps"M*
s4a1►
4)1)'14 i fn OweI01w 0000"41 T'.r'.Lk Inwal 1 MR ormto me l/uWAtl1 at MIA nne the
�� It}unl•. "11�'! 1.1QSIt nal town%,JUWd.d due 141.7'l3t•WIYe G Re KJA
4 S 4 waM ve"newpalel to O'MN
firt=o 1I,41C111 kr v.rY tnua•nf•.1' l one ".nd W-,49l KI A Nn4t are ne kelaw d-*W&6
YAY 411Wnr e1(e
S 1 1 urt4or tdnd rconreRt 4pd WA 1h`rel Bleed rtr;nr;rrlc• .lwsrf e.1�0earn p
wtplclmaM lTpIr1I-r firhtl/,d 1rryM'')*w*,n 4 M.1nyA'h
1 1 f oMltMh on Inatltnpby 0%6 :10(01111144'{In 0011A windwer(AR bey IManytllR and
taelly 4ti..bprlaa +M aratrt 0n wwlxlr"ewltnem n powt ono r W nab
1411 h1_,�ncnr� .
S I 1 N..►wtneN Martel and Woo N MAN d"We w.41w11 h.mt fw"ro1l1 Md When-
LcnlQrutiW+1 mtailugl -s Ire mN&%Y1h 1►. IN a1 Wtw d Me c4A.H rrM"Voro
1 I:Iry Y 4111001101e fiaWlN p1,011I WA 1..111 1/'•49:Akt s"shit I.alkr.tt
r �,11111n1IYnh
611CAnWIdMnpIIAROn4rMMn0 WA <nd'u.santncK.Mfor nIs01W=ImO
Qua 1petlk 0/0tr:t
ITEM NUMBER: C -4
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
.bbMM �:p a ltwcraim
Table C
ping 1W*k=w4Ns e*am
-.F w L1�rr00•• 1MI..M 0""Pon Poop*"ftoA•Otl•••IM111f C�tN tIM011�
�4 <vsI•j C1swwY=•.;qR•t�rr'•A' Kr: Y•s1 Cr M 0"V W4 ftbapg WAF 0001 w W WA*9awsttl•tt1 w"Wwta b tlt•tas*ww t•
^ssw•�rl 4+d Mts/q�Or*t sl Daw1p q*r~a so Mr/p 01Www t
•1 2 a1ff+trl•c stns tatasq
•QslOrwt Mx t1M iM tttrarort:�. n�MSW got"mow to•tr•OslwwtstavN C+/nw'e•co•YN
aup"s A' Tr tweew"M sets•t 00111'
•-,W aaN9 We DOW POP100 000*00 r 2010 b A• wM
t 1!an rst woffmary ,ya m 4b t�•�t0ntq etOt•sww T+t•CA► At b•tn t•1pU n
•tf+wew DMI t.ate�tr t.�W tt•H trrt Os•R p aa+�.�
a a•rta...t
t
14 aYstattt ps•or•t•a 0"matoaOr+�r+e pM trA angofs' xa mot w saYtM la NUN prolnta
!1 Aw Grp
lit spa Nt ue %a to.-A It Vs••"Lobe••e0 w A t s•tth•Yc•W M pts-..
•ndOK�lor SpOt�b 1tt110•t0 10A a►galq
0 10 trra•ww tot
viu
ttiDn 1f1ot41W b t± 1rA�twss►o"
4 1 t�•Ro•m000o•ttcy•C•cta0 trA �1! fi6d t7•DrOMWtis ca•AtA%r WS M ttW" Tt»Oa 6OW M t•Or�ttjko 11 t"ROA
t Re.to N�*a WA 261! Atft s•p'tt0at/1st�DltOrw dM tltftstt• Tt..M tt"At•is V*dlil*IOOst H t••t1GA
ITEM NUMBER: C -4
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
ATTACHMENT 2: 2011 RHNA Income Limits
PLN 2006-1133
State Income Limits for 2011 5 of 8
See instructions on last page to use these income limits to determine applicant ellgibilit and caicolat affordable housing cost and rent
Number of Persons in Household
County Income Category 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Riverside County Extremely Low 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 21,600 23,200 24,800 26,400
4-Person Very Low Income 23,350 26,700 30,050 33,350 36,050 38,700 41,400 44,050
Area Median Income: Lower Income 37,350 42,700 48,050 53,350 57,650 61,900 66,200 70,450
62,500 Median Income 43,750 50,000 56,250 62,500 67,500 72,500 77,500 82,500
Moderate Income 52,500 60,000 67,500 75,000 61,000 87,000 93,000 99,000
Sacramento County Extremely Low 15,800 18,050 20,300 22,550 24,400 26,200 26,000 29,800
4-Person Very Low Income 26,300 30,050 33,800 37,550 40,600 43,600 46,600 49,600
Area Median Income: Lower Income 42,100 48,100 54,100 60,100 64,950 69,750 74,550 79,350
75,100 Median Income 52,550 60,100 67,600 75,100 81,100 87,100 93,100 99,150
Moderate Income 63,050 72,100 81,100 90,100 97,300 104,500 111,700 118,950
San Benito County Extremely Low 16,450 16,800 21,150 28,500 25,400 27,300 29,150 31,050
4-Person Very Low Income 27,450 31,350 35,250 39,150 42,300 45,450 48,550 51,700
Area Median Income: Lower Income 43,900 50,150 56,400 62,650 67,700 72,700 77,700 82,700
78,300 Median Income 54,800 62,650 70,450 78,300 84,550 90,850 97,100 103,350
Moderate income 65,750 75,150 84,550 93,950 101,450 109,000 116,500 124,000
San Bernardino County Extremely Low 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 21,600 23,200 24,800 26,400
4-Person Very Low Income 23,350 26,700 30,050 33,350 36,050 38,700 41,400 44,050
Area Median Income: Lower Income 37,350 42,700 48,050 53,350 57,650 61,900 66,200 70,450
62,500 Median Income 43,750 50,000 56,250 62,500 67,500 . 72,500 77,500 82,500
Moderate Income 52,500 60,000 67,600 75,000 81,000 87,000 93,000 99,000
San Diego County Extremely Low 17,200 19,650 22,100 24,550 26,550 28,500 30,450 32,450
4-Person Very Low Income 28,700 32,800 36,900 40,950 44,250 47,550 50,800 54,100
Area Median Income; Lower Income 45,850 52,400 58,950 65,500 70,750 76,000 81,250 86,500
74,900 Median Income 52,450 59,900 67,400 74,900 80,900 86,900 92,900 98,850
Moderate income 62,950 71,900 80,900 89,900 97,100 104,300 111,500 118,650
San Francisco County Extremely Low 22,450 25,650 28,850 32,050 34,650 37,200 39,750 42,350
4-Person Very Low Income 37,400 42,750 48,100 53,400 57,700 61,950 66,250 70,500
Area Median Income: Lower Income 59,850 68,400 76,950 85,450 92,300 99,150 106,000 112,800
101,600 Median Income 71,100 81,300 91,450 101,600 109,750 117,850 126,000 134,100
Moderate Income 85,350 97,500 109,700 121,900 131,650 141,400 151,150 160,900
San Joaquin County Extremely Low 13,750 15,700 17,650 19,600 21,200 22,750 24,350 25,900
4-Person Very Low Income 22,900 26,200 29,450 32,700 35,350 37,950 40,550 43,200
Area Median Income: Lower Income 36,650 41,850 47,100 52,300 56,500 60,700 64,900 69,050
65,400 Median Income 45,800 52,300 58,850 65,400 70,650 75,850 81,100 86,350
Moderate Income 54,950 62,800 70,650 78,500 84,800 91,050 97,350 103,600
San Luis Obispo County Extremely Low 15,650 17,850 20,100 22,300 24,100 25,900 27,700 29,450
4-Person Very Low Income 26,050 29,800 33,500 37,200 40,200 43,200 46,150 49,150
Area Median Income; Lower Income 41,650 47,600 53,550 59 5W 64,300 69,050 73,800 78,550
74,400 Median Income 52,100 59,500 66,950 74,400 80,350 86,300 92,250 98,200
Moderate Income 62,500 71,450 80,350 89,300 96,450 103,600 110,750 117,900
See instructions on last page to use these income limits to determine applicant eligibility and calculate affordable housing cost and rent
ITEM NUMBER: C -4
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 3
ATTACHMENT 3: 2011 San Luis Obispo County Previously Approved Project Formula
PLN 2006-1133
Affordable Housing Standards For Previously Approved Projects
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING
County Government Center San Luis Obispo,Calitomia 93408 Tele one f 8051 781-5600
This bulletin summanzes the county's affordable housing standards for previously approved projects. It applies to projects
approved by the Comity,and to subdnrision applications accepted for processing,prior to the following dates:
January 2007 for Inland area,or July 2009 for Coastal Zone area.
Income limits:
The state defines family income groups as follows: 'Very Low Income"is defined by Health and Safety Code
Section 50105 as 500/.of county median income; "Lower Income"is defined by Health and Safety Coda Section
0079.5 as 80%of county median income; "Moderate Income"is defined by Health and Safety Code Section
0093 as 120%of county median income. Effective June 17,2010 the income limits for San Luis Obispo County
are shown below:
Persons in Very Low Lower ktcome Median Income Moderate
Family Income Income
3 sb�3.550 66,950 W,350
$37.2(10C&4.3W $80.350
$74.400 $89,300
540.200 $96,4506 543,200 $86,300 $103,6007 $46.150 $92,250 $110,750
Rents and sales prices:
ontlilly Ra rite(1T Initials Prices 2
Unit ¢e Very Law Lower Income ra a Very ow owerModerate Income
(Bedrooms) Income Income Income Income
io
3 $1.004.38 $1.20525 $1,734.00 $170.342 $259,531 $403,357
4 $1,078.75 $1.294.50 $1,784.00 $182.956 1 $278,749 $433226
Novi mmnun rents wain above nciucte toss IX umtles based on uUq aeavances determined W ne Horsing AWnruy d San Lus Obispo
'Fair I4vW Rate-rekreae tH HUD annusilr 10cloberl
Note 2: MUM=sales prices warn above are t+esea on assunpton rhal specism rnancinn is not commmeo to project,and
triererae.resect 11th DtsW Cost o(Fuas vioex of 1.36o9L,wtli n s emectne Troiign Jury 201 t,acaram to Te
Federal HOME!Loan Barer to San Ftancr=witerest rate tiMne:415-616-2600,ariarwr.Mb9.CoT'cmrnon"xnor"-aspl.
Updated:7/5(2011
ITEM NUMBER: C - 5
DATE: 04/24/12
P—M m iillii'i'ji F in
1918��, 1979
L�-
�
CAD
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — Community Development Department
General Plan Amendment 2012 Timing Exception
RECOMMENDATION:
Council grant an exception to the date for the non-reserved General Plan Amendment
2011 Cycle A, to allow a General Plan Amendment to be considered by Planning
Commission and City Council between May 2012 and December 2012 for the Del Rio
Road Commercial Area Specific Plan (a.k.a. Walmart / Annex).
DISCUSSION:
The General Plan Land Use, Open Space and Conservation Element outlines the
process and requirements for General Plan Amendments. Consistent with California
Government Code Section 65358(b), no Element of the General Plan may be amended
more than four (4) times per calendar year. Two cycles of amendments are reserved
for City use on City projects, such as a Housing Element Update. The remaining two
cycles are available for other amendment applications, including private development
projects.
Page II-52 of the General Plan identifies the following dates for the non-reserved
General Plan Amendment cycles for non-City initiated projects. The General Plan
states that the City Council may grant exceptions to the dates identified for each
cycle prior to Planning Commission hearing.
General Plan Amendment Cycles
Cycle A Planning Commission 1" Tuesday of March
City Council 4th Tuesday of March
Cycle B Planning Commission 1;t Tuesday of September
City Council 4th Tuesday of September
Cycle C Reserved for City amendments (may be heard at any meeting)
Cycle D Reserved for City amendments (may be heard at any meeting)
ITEM NUMBER: C - 5
DATE: 04/24/12
Staff is recommending that the City Council grant an exception, as allowed by the
General Plan, to move the 2012 Cycle A Planning Commission and City Council hearing
dates to anytime between May and December 2012. Since there are currently no other
GPA applications pending for a 2012 hearing date, this exception will allow flexibility to
process a General Plan Amendment for the Del Rio Road Commercial Area Specific
Plan in late spring or summer 2012. If this request is not granted, the project hearing
will be delayed to September 2012.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ALTERNATIVES:
Council could choose not to approve an exception to the General Plan Amendment
2012 Cycle A timing. The next private development General Plan Amendment would
not be heard by Planning Commission or City Council until the Cycle B dates in
September 2012.
ATTACHMENT:
Attachment 1 — General Plan Section Regarding Exception
Attachment 2 — Draft Resolution Approving Exception to GPA Timing
ITEM NUMBER: C - 5
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
Attachment 1: General Plan Section Regarding Timing and Exception
City of Ataswdero
General Plan Land Use,Open Space and Conservation Element
5. Public Hearings
Consistent with section 65358(b),no element of the General Plan shall be amended more than
four(4)times per calendar year. Two cycles of amendments shall be reserved for City use and
the remaining two cycles shall be available for other amendment applications. More than one
amendment application maybe considered during a cycle provided it is heard on the same
public hearing date. The dates for the non-reserved General Plan amendment cycles shall be as
follows,the City Council may grant exceptions to the dates prior to Planning Commission
hearing.
General Plan Amendment Cycles
Cycle A Planning Commission 1"Tuesday of March
City Council 4� Tuesday of March
Cycle B Planning Commission 1 Tuesday of September
City Council 4"'Tuesday of September
Cycle C Reserved for City amendments(may be heard at any meeting)
Cycle D Reserved for City amendments(may be heard at any meeting)
Both the Planning Commission and the City Council shall hold a public heating on the General
Plan Amendment application,in accordance State Law Government Code. In approving the
amendment the following findings shall be made.
General Plan Amendment Findings
1. The proposed amendment is in the public interest.
2. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the adopted General Plan Goals,
Policies,and Programs and the overall intent of the General Plan.
3. The proposed amendment is compatible with existing development,neighborhoods
and the environment.
4. The proposed amendment will not create any new significant and unavoidable
impacts to traffic,infrastructure,or public services.
5. The proposed amendment is consistent with adopted EIR and mitigation monitoring
program.
6. Exceptions
Minor adjustments to General Plan boundaries and diagrams may be approved with a
simplified process that does not require additional studies. Minor adjustments would include
Final Plan Page II-53 June 25,2002
ITEM NUMBER: C - 5
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
Attachment 2: Draft Resolution
DRAFT RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AN EXCEPTION TO THE TIMING
OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CYCLE A FOR 2011
(City of Atascadero)
WHEREAS, The General Plan Land Use, Open Space and Conservation Element allows
each General Plan Element to be amended no more than four(4) times per calendar year; and,
WHEREAS, two cycles of amendments are reserved for City use, and the remaining two
cycles are available for other amendment applications; and,
WHEREAS, the General Plan identifies Cycle A as a non-City reserved GPA cycle with
Planning Commission hearing scheduled for the first Tuesday of March, and City Council
hearing scheduled for the fourth Tuesday of September; and,
WHEREAS, the General Plan states that the City Council may grant exceptions to the
dates identified for each cycle prior to Planning Commission hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero considered the proposed
exception at a public meeting on April 24, 2012; and,
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, hereby resolves to
approve an exception to the timing of Cycle A for the 2012 calendar year to allow Planning
Commission and City Council hearings for General Plan Amendment Cycle A to be held
anytime between May 2012 and December 2012.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 5
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member
the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll
call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO
By:
Bob Kelley, Mayor
ATTEST:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney
ITEM NUMBER: C - 6
DATE: 04/24/12
n FR m l''lll� ff IF �
C4 7
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — Public Works Department
Lake Park Frontage Signage
RECOMMENDATION:
Council approve the proposed text and graphics for the main monument sign for the
Atascadero Lake Park Frontage Project.
DISCUSSION:
The Lake Park Frontage Project is under construction. The contractor has submitted
final monument signage details and they are presented tonight for Council's approval.
Background: The Lake Park Frontage Project includes three sign elements, namely:
1. Main monument sign for the Lake Park, Zoo and Pavilion
2. Veterans Memorial monument sign
3. Event banner holder
The original architectural rendering of the main monument sign depicted specific
graphics for "Atascadero Lake Park," "Charles Paddock Zoo" and "Veterans Memorial"
(see Attachment 1). There was also a placeholder location in the Lake Park Frontage
design for a Veterans Memorial monument sign along Morro Road to be separately
funded and constructed by the Veterans Memorial Foundation (see Attachment 2).
Their plans have been finalized and funding is currently ongoing. The banner holder is
also included in the frontage project and the design is unchanged (see Attachment 3).
Summary: Considering significant progress on the stand-alone Veterans Memorial
monument sign design, permitting and fundraising efforts, Staff now recommends the
placement of the "Pavilion" text on the City's main monument sign at the Zoo parking lot
driveway. The Pavilion facility does not currently have a sign on Morro Road and would
benefit from the additional wayfinding.
The company manufacturing the main monument sign has recommended the lettering
size and simplified graphics as shown on the proposed main monument sign submittal
ITEM NUMBER: C - 6
DATE: 04/24/12
(see Attachment 4). Staff supports the proposed changes, as they will be more legible
and effective for traveling motorists in locating the facilities and attractions at the Lake
Park.
Staff recommends Council approve the proposed text on the main monument sign as
presented.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the original text and graphic design of the main monument sign.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Original main monument sign detail
2. Veterans Memorial sign detail
3. Banner holder detail
4. Proposed main monument sign detail
ITEM NUMBER: C - 6
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 1
ORIGINAL MAIN MONUMENT SIGN CONCEPT:
SOLAR PANE: LOCATION
FOR SIGN LIGHTING
1
ROOF'OPEN STRUCTuii`'1'L'R
ALP M16% GUMM5 ti
C[Tv 0f ATASOA CR0
I ETCH D BLACK
K MA
ETCHES BLACK{tARS1t
CONCRETE SIGN RASE
Im S.F]
STAIN:[5S SIM LrTTERS
Lake Park 9
c I L� P.irtw.i- IS AND-OFfI p
lop cont CnuluN CAP
�•� STONE COLLM%
Memorial CONC. COLUNN CAP
STONE_Et ri
�6
J --
LTAiltil`iR iT[L
—Ib'� i-'. i,'i' — trine wew:•�uut—�,—
sK3M
SCALE. 3/8' 1•-0.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 6
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 2
PROPOSED VETERANS SIGN:
FAQ
OF VE IV ANS _;a
:r MFWGR[AL
FREEDOM - 4 ,
t
ITEM NUMBER: C - 6
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 3
BANNER HOLDER (NO CHANGE):
' - - Crt=ATW Mir!w
DAL CELCOATlue
Atfft PIAL
� yYAq/P16 IMPNN!'
Yr I`ADM MMe*
to WAWA
0A IETAL PAWED
— k"017 Mir
i
17C/IC.OCl�11M JP
51CNC 4ASi
' Y
FA �..•' Pfi.
PM&tiff i owm
IRI.1+TWa_lfwj" ai.ti'+R 97tq/i
i
h BANDER HCHOER
„I
ITEM NUMBER: C - 6
DATE: 04/24/12
Attachment 4
PROPOSED LETTERING AND TEXT:
cvnc.,-grtOr� LOGO INSET AND PAINTEI
T-b U4"
r•8 ur'-
R6"
Lake Park FONTS:HOLLAND T11
6-211x' ALL LETTEPJNG PAIN
GREEN
4'-11112"
ZOO
1"X 52"ACCENT LIN1
4-3112" - PAINTED BLACK
Pavilion Or-3
1� FOOMG
-7 3l4 15 MY OVERS)
NOTE: ONLY SIGN FACE AND FOOTING SHOWN. BASE, COLUMNS AND
TRELLIS/ROOF SAME AS ORIGINAL DESIGN. NO CHANGES TO MATERIALS,
COLORS OR FINISHES.