HomeMy WebLinkAbout112211 - Agenda Packet 112211 Amended Agenda-Combined Tf Flu,
ooMDED l 'j' gRRiDp
1978`'
1918 R
�E CITY OF ATASCADERO
CITY COUNCIL
AMENDED AGENDA
Tuesday, November 22, 2011
City Hall
Council Chambers
6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, California
City Council Regular Session 6:00 p.m.
City Council Closed Session: Immediately following conclusion of
the City Council Regular Session
REGULAR SESSION — CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor O'Malley
ROLL CALL: Mayor O'Malley
Mayor Pro Tem Kelley
Council Member Clay
Council Member Fonzi
Council Member Sturtevant
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call
PRESENTATIONS:
1 . Christina Lefevre Latner from Friends of the Library will provide an update on
the new Library facility design plans and fundraising progress
2. Fire Captain Matt Miranda will provide an update on the PG&E Grant
progress relating to the Disaster Response Trailer
A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (All items on the consent calendar are considered to
be routine and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion
if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If
comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the
consent calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an
opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the
item before action is taken. DRAFT MINUTES: Council meeting draft minutes
are listed on the Consent Calendar for approval of the minutes. Should anyone
wish to request an amendment to draft minutes, the item will be removed from
the Consent Calendar and their suggestion will be considered by the City
Council. If anyone desires to express their opinion concerning issues included in
draft minutes, they should share their opinion during the Community Forum
portion of the meeting.)
1. City Council Draft Action Minutes — October 25, 2011
■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Draft Action
Minutes of October 25, 2011 . [City Clerk]
2. City Council / Community Redevelopment Agency Special Joint
Meeting Draft Action Minutes — October 25, 2011
■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Council / Community
Redevelopment Agency Special Joint Meeting Draft Action Minutes of
October 25, 2011 . [City Clerk]
3. September 2011 Accounts Payable and Payroll
■ Fiscal Impact: $2,870,956.30.
■ Recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable,
payroll and payroll vendor checks for September 2011 . [Administrative
Services]
4. Change Order for Affordable Housing Professional Services
Consultant Contract
■ Fiscal Impact: Approval of this recommendation will result in the
additional expenditure of up to $40,000 in affordable housing funds.
■ Recommendations: Council:
1 . Authorize the City Manager to sign Change Order #1 in the amount of
$40,000 to extend the Urban Futures Incorporated for affordable
housing on-call professional services; and,
2. Authorize the Director of Administrative Services to appropriate $32,000
from the Production of Affordable Units Fund for professional services
related to the Affordable Housing Assistance Strategy and related to
producing affordable housing units; and,
3. Authorize the Director of Administrative Services to appropriate $8,000
from the In Lieu Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund for professional
services related to the Affordable Housing Assistance Strategy and
related to producing affordable housing units; and,
4. Authorize the City Manager to approve any minor additional change
orders up to $10,000 for affordable housing on-call professional
services. [Community Development]
5. Integrated Police Mobile Data Computer Systems and Interview Room
Surveillance System
■ Fiscal Impact: The fiscal impact of this project is $156,258.77 in
budgeted funds.
■ Recommendation: Council award purchase to Coban Technologies in
the amount of $156,258.77 for nine (9) mobile data computers with
integrated in-car video, three (3) integrated automatic license plate
readers and one interview room surveillance system. [Police]
6. Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) License To Serve Beer and Wine
PLN 2011-1423 / ABC 2011-0014, 6005 EI Camino Real (Colby Jack
Cafe, Inc.)
■ Fiscal Impact: None
■ Recommendation: Council adopt Draft Resolution A finding that public
convenience or necessity would be served by allowing the issuance of a
Type 41 ABC license for the on-site sale of beer and wine at Colby Jack
Cafe, Inc. at 6005 EI Camino Real
UPDATES FROM THE CITY MANAGER: (The City Manager will give an oral report on
any current issues of concern to the City Council.)
COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to
address the Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has
jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to three minutes. Please state your name for the
record before making your presentation. Comments made during Community Forum
...:11 .__1 L_- _..1-:__i _r r:__..__:_._ n ..-_ _t nn .a__ ...:n L_- _n_...__I t_._
have questions or need information, may contact the City Clerk's Office, between the
hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at 470-3400, or mtorgerson(@_atascadero.org.)
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Title 8 Building Code Text Amendment - Dormant Building Permit
Application Extension Program - Phase 4 Option
■ Fiscal Impact: Through Phase 4, it is likely that between $90,000 and
$180,000 in outstanding plan check fees will be collected by the City.
■ Recommendation: Council introduce for first reading by title only, Draft
Ordinance A to create a Phase 4 Dormant Building Permit Program
consistent with staff's recommendations. [Community Development]
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Project Design Approval - Atascadero Creek Pedestrian Bridge and
"Centennial Plaza"
■ Fiscal Impact: None. The bridge, plaza, creek trail and parking lot area
rehabilitation project has an approved total budget cap of $3,068,560.
■ Recommendation: Design Review Committee Recommends:
The City Council approve the schematic design of "Centennial Plaza"
and Atascadero Creek trail. [Community Development]
2. 2010 Census Summary Report
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council receive and file the attached 2010 Census
Report. No action is required. [Community Development]
3. Amendments to Existing Executive Management Contracts to be
Consistent with AB 1344
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council amend the existing contract between the City
of Atascadero and the City Manager and provide the City Manager with
authority to amend executive management employee contracts
consistent with the provisions of AB 1344. [City Manager]
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative, Council
Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities.
Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take
action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. The Council may
take action on items listed on the Agenda.)
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: (The following represent standing committees.
Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary):
Mayor O'Malley
1 . City / Schools Committee
2. County Mayors Round Table
3. Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA)
4. League of California Cities — CITIPAC Board Member
5. SLO Council of Governments (SLOCOG)
6. SLO Regional Transit Authority (SLORTA)
Mayor Pro Tem Kelley
1 . Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Committee
2. Atascadero Youth Task Force
3. City of Atascadero Design Review Committee
4. City of Atascadero Finance Committee
5. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC)
6. Homeless Services Oversight Council
Council Member Fonzi
1 . Air Pollution Control District
2. City of Atascadero Design Review Committee
3. City of Atascadero Finance Committee
4. SLO Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) - alternate
Council Member Sturtevant
1 . City / Schools Committee
2. Community Action Partnership of SLO County
3. League of California Cities — Council Liaison
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND / OR ACTION:
1 . City Council
2. City Clerk
3. City Treasurer
4. City Attorney
5. City Manager
F. ADJOURN TO CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION: Immediately following conclusion of the
City Council Regular Session, which begins
at 6:00 p.m.
1. CLOSED SESSION -- PUBLIC COMMENT
2. COUNCIL LEAVES CHAMBERS TO BEGIN CLOSED SESSION
3. CLOSED SESSION -- CALL TO ORDER
a. Conference with Real Property Negotiators
(Govt. Code Sec. 54956.8)
Property Address: APN 031-381-001
7805 Pismo Avenue, Atascadero, CA
City Negotiator: Wade McKinney, City Manager
Negotiating Parties: Robert J. Gumer
Under Negotiation: Instruction to negotiator will concern price and terms
of payment.
b. Conference with Real Property Negotiators
(Govt. Code Sec. 54956.8)
Property Address #1 : APN 030-292-027
8555 San Andres Avenue, Atascadero, CA
City Negotiator: Wade McKinney, City Manager
Negotiating Parties: Gene Rauch
Property Address #2: APN 030-292-067
8575 San Andres Avenue, Atascadero, CA
City Negotiator: Wade McKinney, City Manager
Negotiating Parties: Yvonne High
Property Address #3: APN 030-301-033
8560 San Andres Avenue, Atascadero, CA
City Negotiator: Wade McKinney, City Manager
Negotiating Parties: Roger Bartholomew
Under Negotiation: Instruction to negotiator will concern price and terms
of payment.
C. Conference with Labor Negotiators (Govt. Code Sec. 54957.6)
Agencydesignated representatives: Wade McKinney, City Manager
Employee Organizations: Atascadero Firefighters Bargaining Unit;
Atascadero Police Association; Service Employees International Union,
Local 620; Mid-Management/Professional Employees; Non-Represented
Professional and Management Workers and Confidential Employees
4. CLOSED SESSION -- ADJOURNMENT
e r+r%l 1k1r+11 M17 rl lr%KIC+ -rte f%"A RArlr"MC-
Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that
person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. Correspondence submitted at this
public hearing will be distributed to the Council and available for review in the City Clerk's office.
I, Lisa Cava, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of perjury that the
foregoing amended agenda for the November 22, 2011 Regular Session of the Atascadero City Council
was posted on November 18, 2011, at the Atascadero City Hall, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA
93422 and was available for public review in the Customer Service Center at that location.
Signed this 18th day of November, 2011, at Atascadero, California.
Lisa Cava, Deputy City Clerk
City of Atascadero
City of Atascadero
WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 6:00 p.m. unless the
Community Redevelopment Agency meeting commencing at 6:00 p.m. in which event the Council meeting will comr
immediately following the conclusion of the Community Redevelopment Agency meeting. Council meetings will be f
the City Hall Council Chambers, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero. Matters are considered by the Council in the or
the printed Agenda. Regular Council meetings are televised live, audio recorded and videotaped for future pla,
Charter Communication customers may view the meetings on Charter Cable Channel 20 or via the City's web,,
www.atascadero.org. Meetings are also broadcast on radio station KPRL AM 1230. Contact the City Clerk for
information (470-3400).
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are
in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public inspection during City Hall business hours at the Front Cour
City Hall, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, and on our website, www.atascadero.org. An agenda packet is
available for public review at the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road. Contracts, Resolutions and Ordinances N
allocated a number once they are approved by the City Council. The minutes of this meeting will reflect these nun
All documents submitted by the public during Council meetings that are either read into the record or referred to it
statement will be noted in the minutes and available for review in the City Clerk's office.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City mE
or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office or the City Clerk's Office, both at
470-3400. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City
assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA
Under Agenda item, "COMMUNITY FORUM", the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having business wi
Council to approach the lectern and be recognized.
1. Give your name for the record (not required)
2. State the nature of your business.
3. All comments are limited to 3 minutes.
4. All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council.
5. No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any
individual, absent or present
This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes N
allowed for Community Forum (unless changed by the Council). If you wish to use a computer presentation to si
your comments, you must notify the City Clerk's office at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Digital presentationE
be brought to the meeting on a USB drive or CD. You are required to submit to the City Clerk a printed copy o
presentation for the record. Please check in with the City Clerk before the meeting begins to announce your pre
and turn in the printed copy.
TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS (from Title 2, Chapter 1 of the Atascadero Municipal Code)
Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will give
report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is ope
will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being considered to step up to the lectE
you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way:
1. You must approach the lectern and be recognized by the Mayor
2. Give your name (not required)
3. Make your statement
4. All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council
5. No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any
individual, absent or present
6. All comments limited to 3 minutes
The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public comments
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 11/22/11
FIT
lots R 1979
\A 'rango
CITY OF A TA SCA DERO
CITY COUNCIL
DRAFT ACTION MINUTES
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
City Hall
Council Chambers
6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, California
City Council Closed Session: 5:00 p.m.
City Council Regular Session: 6:00 p.m.
Joint Study Session of the Immediately following the
City Council and Community conclusion of the City Council
Redevelopment Agency of Regular Session
Atascadero
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION: 5:00 P.M.
Mayor O'Malley announced that the Council is going into Closed Session at 5:00 p.m.
1. CLOSED SESSION -- PUBLIC COMMENT - None
2. COUNCIL LEAVES CHAMBERS TO BEGIN CLOSED SESSION
3. CLOSED SESSION -- CALL TO ORDER
a. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
(Government Code Section 54957)
Title: CITY MANAGER
4. CLOSED SESSION -- ADJOURNMENT
5. COUNCIL RETURNS TO CHAMBERS
6. CLOSED SESSION -- REPORT
Mayor O'Malley announced that there was no reportable action taken.
REGULAR SESSION — CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M.
Mayor O'Malley called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and Council Member Sturtevant
led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Council Members Clay, Fonzi, Sturtevant, Mayor Pro Tem Kelley
and Mayor O'Malley
Absent: None
Others Present: City Clerk / Assistant to City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson
Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manager Jim Lewis,
Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard, Community
Development Director Warren Frace, Public Works Director Russ
Thompson, Acting Police Chief Steve Gesell, and City Attorney
Brian Pierik.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call
MOTION: By Council Member Fonzi and seconded by Council Member
Sturtevant to approve the agenda.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. City Council Draft Action Minutes — September 27, 2011
■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Draft Action
Minutes of September 27, 2011 . [City Clerk]
2. City Council Draft Action Minutes — October 11, 2011
■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Draft Action
Minutes of October 11 , 2011 . [City Clerk]
3. August 2011 Accounts Payable and Payroll
■ Fiscal Impact: $3,461 ,048.70.
■ Recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable,
payroll and payroll vendor checks for August 2011 : [Administrative
Services]
4. Confirm the Appointment of the Police Chief
■ Fiscal Impact: None. The Police chief annual salary of $136,941 .72 is
included in the Police Department's FY2011-2013 Budget.
■ Recommendation: Council confirm the appointment of Jerel Haley as
Police Chief. [City Manager]
5. Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund
■ Fiscal Impact: The City will receive the $100,000 grant of SLESF
restricted funds and will utilize it for frontline police services.
■ Recommendation: Council designate and approve spending plan for
2011/2012 Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF)
monies in the amount of $100,000 to be used for frontline police
services. [Police]
Citizen Broadwater pulled Items #A-1 & 2.
MOTION: By Council Member Fonzi and seconded by Council Member
Sturtevant to approve Items #A-3, 4, & 5 of the Consent
Calendar.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
Mr. Broadwater expressed his displeasure with the change to action minutes prepared
for the City Council meetings.
MOTION: By Council Member Fonzi and seconded by Council Member
Sturtevant to approve Items #A-1 & 2 of the Consent Calendar.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Kelley & Sturtevant
abstained on Item #A-2 due to absence)
UPDATES FROM THE CITY MANAGER:
City Manager Wade McKinney gave an update on projects and issues within the City.
COMMUNITY FORUM:
The following citizens spoke during Community Forum: Bob Lloyd, Jerry Reeve, Mike
Brennler, and David Broadwater.
Mayor O'Malley closed the COMMUNITY FORUM period.
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None.
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Vacation Leave Accrual
■ Fiscal Impact: The Fiscal Impact will depend upon the option selected by
the City Council regarding vacation accrual.
■ Recommendation: Council provide direction to City Staff regarding
vacation leave accrual options. [City Attorney]
City Attorney Brian Pierik gave the staff report and answered questions from the
Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
The following citizens spoke on this item: Joan O'Keefe, Mike Brennler, and David
Broadwater.
Mayor O'Malley closed the Public Comment period.
MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Kelley and seconded by Council Member
Fonzi to direct staff to work with the employee groups through
the meet and confer process, as part of the comprehensive
Personnel Rules update, to modify the current vacation leave
accrual rule. Staff is to make sure that the new rule will be
consistent, clear, reasonable and comfortable to all
employees. Also, the definitions of administrative leave and
furlough should be included in the Personnel Rules.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
2. Modifications to the Restaurant Stimulus Loan Program
■ Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact as a result of making
modifications to the program; however, if modifications are made, staff
anticipates requests for funds.
■ Recommendation: Council provide direction to staff on whether or not to
modify provisions of the existing Restaurant Stimulus Loan Program. [City
Manager/ Office of Economic Development]
Assistant City Manager Jim Lewis gave the staff report and answered questions from
the Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
The following citizens spoke on this item: Dennis Schmidt, and Karyn Sturtevant.
Mayor O'Malley closed the Public Comment period.
There was Council consensus to bring this issue back to the City Council
during the Council's Strategic Planning in 2012, which will be scheduled
after we receive the decision from the California Supreme Court
regarding the RDA issue.
3. Strategic Planning 2011 — Update on Council Goals
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council:
1 . Provide feedback or additional direction if necessary; and,
2. Receive and file this report on the progress being made relative to the
City Council's three goals. [City Manager]
City Manager Wade McKinney gave the staff report and answered questions from the
Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT: None
The City Council received and filed this report.
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS:
Mayor O'Malley asked for Council consensus to have a Roundabout presentation at a
future City Council meeting.
There was Council consensus to direct staff to have a
Roundabout presentation at a future City Council meeting.
Council Member Fonzi announced that Alice Rew has donated an additional
$100,000.00 to the Atascadero library. Ms. Fonzi stated that the City has already
presented a Resolution of Appreciation to Ms. Rew for her previous donation, and
asked for Council consensus to direct staff to prepare another.
There was Council consensus to direct staff to prepare a
Resolution of Appreciation for Alice Rew for her additional donation of $100,000.
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: None
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND / OR ACTION:
City Manager
Mr. McKinney announced that the November 8t" Council meeting has been
cancelled. The next City Council meeting will be on November 22nd
F. ADJOURN TO JOINT STUDY SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF ATASCADERO.
Mayor O'Malley adjourned the meeting at 7:55 p.m.
MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C.
City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager
ITEM NUMBER: A- 2
DATE: 11/22/11
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING
Atascadero City Council
Community Redevelopment Agency of Atascadero
Study Session
DRAFT ACTION MINUTES
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
(Immediately following the City Council Regular Session
which starts at 6:00 p.m.)
City Council Chambers
6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero
Mayor O'Malley called the joint meeting to order at 8:05 p.m.
Council Member Clay announced that he will be stepping down for this meeting as he
holds the mortgage on one of the properties being discussed tonight.
Council Member Fonzi also announced that she will be stepping down for this meeting
as her home is within 500 feet of one of the properties being discussed tonight.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Council Member Sturtevant, Mayor Pro Tem Kelley and Mayor
O'Malley
Board Members Sturtevant, O'Malley, and Vice Chairperson Kelley
Absent: Council Members Clay and Fonzi recused themselves
Others Present: City Clerk / Assistant to City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson
Staff Present: Assistant City Manager Jim Lewis, Community Development
ROUNDTABLE STUDY SESSION:
1 . Initial Review of Affordable Housing Proposals - Agency Low- and
Moderate-Income Housing Fund
■ Fiscal Impact: None.
■ Recommendation: Council/Board review the affordable housing proposals
that have been received and provide staff direction with respect to the
proposals that should be further processed for potential future consideration.
[Community Development]
Community Development Director Warren Frace gave the staff report, introduced
Steven Dukett of Urban Futures, Inc, who also gave a report, and they both answered
questions from the Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
The following citizens spoke on this item: Mike Bryne of ECHO, Carol Hatley of
Housing Authority of SLO, Susan Warren of North County Connection, Caleb Roope of
Pacific Companies, Cheryl Flores of People's Self-Help Housing Corporation, Jonathan
Emami of ROEM Development Corporation, Pearl Munak of Transitional Food &
Shelter, Inc., Mike Zappas of Hidden Oaks, Jerry Rioux, Jim Patterson, and Al Fonzi.
Mayor O'Malley closed the Public Comment period.
Mayor O'Malley recessed the meeting at 9:57 p.m.
Mayor O'Malley reconvened the meeting at 10:10 p.m.
The Council/Board went through the list of proposed projects and gave staff direction to
focus on the following projects for future consideration from the RDA/Council:
• EI Camino Homeless Organization (ECHO)
• North County Connection (NCC)
• People's Self-Help Housing Corporation (PSHHC)
• ROEM Development Corporation (ROEM)
• Hidden Oaks Association
ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor O'Malley adjourned the joint meeting at 10:48 p.m.
MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C.
City Clerk / Assistant to the City Manager
ITEM NUMBER: A — 3
DATE: 11/22/11
P
Atascad ro Cif Council
Staff Report - Administrative Services Department
September 2011 Accounts Payable and Payroll
RECOMMENDATION:
Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for
September 2011 .
DISCUSSION:
Attached for City Council review and approval are the following:
Payroll
Dated 911/11 Checks # 29048 - 29082 $ 17,069,98
Direct Deposits 235,385.97
Dated 9115/11 Checks # 29083 - 29118 22,476.66
Direct Deposits 247,817.17
Dated 9129/11 Checks # 29119 - 29148 27,783.60
Direct Deposits 268,433.52
Accounts Payable
Dated 9/1/11 - 9/30/11
Checks # 130207 - 130551
& EFTs 999 - 1011 2,051 ,989.40
TOTAL AMOUNT $ 2,870,956.30
FISCAL IMPACT:
Total expenditures for all funds is $ 2,870,956,30
CERTIFICATION:
The undersigned certifies that the attached demands have been released for payment
and that funds are available for these demands:
�,.^�x/�i 4.+"l.^�.>"V.+�=r ! 6.'�n..• p ale.III
Rach lle Rickard, Director of Administrative Services
Vp
ATTACHMENT:
September 2011 Eden Warrant Register in the amount of $ 2.051 .989.40
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2011
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amo
999 09/05/2011 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Payroll Vendor Payment '
1000 09/06/2011 RABOBANK, N.A. Payroll Vendor Payment 4'
1001 09/06/2011 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 10(
1002 09/06/2011 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1(
1003 09/06/2011 EMPLOYMENT DEV, DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment
130207 09/06/2011 ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN, Payroll Vendor Payment
130208 09/06/2011 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment
130209 09/06/2011 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS Payroll Vendor Payment
130210 09/06/2011 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT Accounts Payable Check c
130211 09/06/2011 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC. Payroll Vendor Payment
130212 09/06/2011 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment i
130213 09/06/2011 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment
130214 09/06/2011 SEIU LOCAL 620 Payroll Vendor Payment
130215 09/06/2011 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 Payroll Vendor Payment
130216 09/06/2011 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 Payroll Vendor Payment
130217 09/08/2011 ALLSTATE WORKPLACE DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment
130218 09/08/2011 CSAC - EIA Payroll Vendor Payment 1
130219 09/08/2011 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES Payroll Vendor Payment 1
130220 09/08/2011 PREFERRED BENEFITS INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment c
130221 09/12/2011 MATTHEW R. AANERUD Accounts Payable Check
130222 09/12/2011 AECOM USA, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1
130223 09/12/2011 ALL SIGNS AND GRAPHICS, LLC Accounts Payable Check 1
130224 09/12/2011 ALTHOUSE & MEADE, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130225 09/12/2011 AMERICAN MARBORG Accounts Payable Check
130226 09/12/2011 AMERICAN WEST TIRE &AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check
130227 09/12/2011 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS-WEST Accounts Payable Check
130228 09/12/2011 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check
130229 09/12/2011 LYNN ARCHIBALD Accounts Payable Check
130230 09/12/2011 ARCHIE'S ALOHA PEST MGMT. Accounts Payable Check
130231 09/12/2011 AT&T Accounts Payable Check
130232 09/12/2011 AT&T Accounts Payable Check
130233 09/12/2011 ATAS COMM REDEV AGENCY Accounts Payable Check 31
130234 09/12/2011 ATASCADERO HAY& FEED Accounts Payable Check 2
130235 09/12/2011 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2011
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amo
130237 09/12/2011 ATASCADERO WASTE ALTERNATIVES Accounts Payable Check
130238 09/12/2011 BASSETT'S CRICKET RANCH,INC. Accounts Payable Check
130239 09/12/2011 BERNARDS Accounts Payable Check 8E
130240 09/12/2011 BERRY MAN, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130241 09/12/2011 JUSTIN BLACK Accounts Payable Check
130242 09/12/2011 DANIEL L. BROWN Accounts Payable Check
130243 09/12/2011 BURKE,WILLIAMS, & SORENSON LLP Accounts Payable Check 2e
130244 09112/2011 ROCKY J. BUSBY Accounts Payable Check
130245 09/12/2011 BUTLER BUSINESS MACHINES Accounts Payable Check
130246 09/12/2011 CA CODE CHECK, INC, Accounts Payable Check 1 C
130247 09/12/2011 CA HIGHWAY PATROL Accounts Payable Check
130248 09/12/2011 VOID Accounts Payable Check
130249 09/12/2011 CAL-COAST REFRIGERATION, INC Accounts Payable Check
130250 09/12/2011 KATE CAPELA Accounts Payable Check
130251 09/12/2011 CENTRAL CA ASA Accounts Payable Check
130252 09/12/2011 CERTIF-A-GIFT COMPANY Accounts Payable Check
130253 09/12/2011 CHANNEL COUNTIES DIVISION Accounts Payable Check
130254 09/12/2011 BRADY CHERRY Accounts Payable Check
130255 09/12/2011 CHEVRON & TEXACO BUS. CARD Accounts Payable Check
130256 09/12/2011 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130257 09/12/2011 KATHLEEN J. CINOWALT Accounts Payable Check
130258 09/12/2011 CLEARS, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130259 09/12/2011 TIMOTHY CLEAVER Accounts Payable Check
130260 09/12/2011 COAST ELECTRONICS Accounts Payable Check
130261 09/12/2011 COASTAL COPY, LP Accounts Payable Check
130262 09/12/2011 COASTAL REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES Accounts Payable Check
130263 09/12/2011 COLONY AUTO SERVICE, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130264 09/12/2011 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check
130265 09/12/2011 DAY-TIMERS, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130266 09112/2011 CYNTHIA L. DECKER Accounts Payable Check
130267 09/12/2011 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check
130268 09/12/2011 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES INC Accounts Payable Check
130269 09/12/2011 DRIVE CUSTOMS Accounts Payable Check
130270 09/12/2011 EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC Accounts Payable Check 19
130271 09/12/2011 ED'S FLY MEAT, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130272 09/12/2011 BRYAN ELLIS Accounts Payable Check
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2011
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Arno
130274 09/12/2011 EWING IRRIGATION GOLF 1NDUSTRL Accounts Payable Check
130275 09/12/2011 FEDERAL EXPRESS Accounts Payable Check
130276 09/12/2011 FENCE FACTORY ATASCADERO Accounts Payable Check
130277 09/12/2011 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130278 09112/2011 FERRAVANTI GRADING & PAVING Accounts Payable Check 3f
130279 09/12/2011 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check
130280 09/12/2011 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL Accounts Payable Check
130281 09/12/2011 FIRST TRANSIT, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1_1
130282 09/12/2011 FLEET SERVICES-TESORO FLEET Accounts Payable Check
130283 09/12/2011 FOSTER FARMS DAIRY Accounts Payable Check 1
130284 09112/2011 WARREN FRACE Accounts Payable Check
130285 09/12/2011 FRAZEE INDUSTRIES, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130286 09/12/2011 DAVID A. GARIBAY Accounts Payable Check
130287 09/12/2011 GARRY BRILL PRODUCTIONS Accounts Payable Check
130288 09/12/2011 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check
130289 09/12/2011 ANDREW J. GEFTAKYS Accounts Payable Check
130290 09/12/2011 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check
130291 09/12/2011 STEPHEN GESELL Accounts Payable Check
130292 09/12/2011 BRADLEY A. HACKLEMAN Accounts Payable Check 1
130293 09/12/2011 KATHLEEN A. HARBOTTLE Accounts Payable Check
130294 09/12/2011 BARRY HARDY Accounts Payable Check
130295 09/12/2011 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT& COPY Accounts Payable Check
130296 09/12/2011 HARVEY'S HONEYHUTS Accounts Payable Check
130297 09/12/2011 HELIXSTORM, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1
130298 09/12/2011 EVELYN R. INGRAM Accounts Payable Check
130299 09/12/2011 CAROL D. JANSSEN Accounts Payable Check
130300 09/12/2011 JIFFY LUBE Accounts Payable Check
130301 09/12/2011 ANN JUTRAS Accounts Payable Check
130302 09/12/2011 KEY TERMITE& PEST CONTROL,INC Accounts Payable Check
130303 09/12/2011 LANDSCAPES BY STACH Accounts Payable Check
130304 09/12/2011 JAMES R. LEWIS Accounts Payable Check
130305 09/12/2011 MARCOR ENVIRONMENTAL, LP Accounts Payable Check 8
130346 09/12/2411 BECKY MAXWELL Accounts Payable Check
130307 09112/2011 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check
130308 09/12/2011 MEDWORKS MEDICAL CENTER, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130309 09/12/2011 CORY MEYER Accounts Payable Check
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2011
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amo
130311 09/12/2011 MICHAEL FREDERICK PAVING,INC. Accounts Payable Check 21
130312 09/1212011 MID-COAST MOWER& SAW, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130313 09/12/2011 MID-STATE SOLID WASTE & RECYCG Accounts Payable Check
130314 09/12/2011 MILLENNIUM CONSULTING ASSC. Accounts Payable Check
130315 09/12/2011 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check
130316 09/12/2011 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION Accounts Payable Check
130317 09/12/2011 NORTH COAST ENGINEERING INC. Accounts Payable Check
130318 09/12/2011 O.C. TANNER Accounts Payable Check
130319 09/12/2011 OFFICE DEPOT INC. Accounts Payable Check
130320 09/12/2011 ONTRAC Accounts Payable Check
130321 09/12/2011 ISMERAI ORTIZ Accounts Payable Check
130322 09/12/2011 OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check
130323 09/12/2011 PACIFIC AUTO GLASS Accounts Payable Check
130324 09/12/2011 PACIFIC HARVEST CATERING CO. Accounts Payable Check
130325 09/12/2011 PASO ROBLES FORD LINCOLN MERC Accounts Payable Check
130326 09/12/2011 PFEIFFER PARTNERS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 5�
130327 09/12/2011 PIERSON ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check
130328 09/12/2011 JASON M. PLATZ Accounts Payable Check
130329 09/12/2011 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY,INC. Accounts Payable Check
130330 09/12/2011 PRW STEEL SUPPLY, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130331 09/12/2011 PUBLIC SAFETY SYSTEMS, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130332 09/12/2011 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check
130333 09/12/2011 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL Accounts Payable Check
130334 09/12/2011 RACHELLE RICKARD Accounts Payable Check
130335 09/12/2011 MICHELLE R. ROGERS Accounts Payable Check
130336 09/12/2011 SAFETY DRIVERS ED., LLC_ Accounts Payable Check
130337 09/12/2011 SANTA LUCIA BANK Accounts Payable Check 1
130338 09/12/2011 SANTA MARGARITA CONST, CORP. Accounts Payable Check 1
130339 09/12/2011 SCOVELL TREE SURGERY Accounts Payable Check
130340 09/12/2011 SHELL Accounts Payable Check 1
130341 09/12/2011 SLO CO HEALTH AGENCY Accounts Payable Check
130342 09/1212011 SMART AND FINAL Accounts Payable Check
130343 09/12/2011 DAVID L. SMAW Accounts Payable Check
130344 09/12/2011 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY Accounts Payable Check
130345 09/12/2011 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN Accounts Payable Check 1
130346 09/1212011 STREET SMART SIGNS, INC. Accounts Payable Check
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2011
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amoi
130348 09/12/2011 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1
130349 09/12/2011 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIERS, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130350 09/12/2011 BUSS THOMPSON Accounts Payable Check
130351 09/12/2011 ULTREX BUSINESS PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check
130352 09/1212011 IWINA M. VAN BEEK Accounts Payable Check
130353 09/12/2011 VANDERWERT MOBILE LOCKSMITHING Accounts Payable Check
130354 09/12/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 2
130355 09/12/2011 VIDEO PALACE Accounts Payable Check
130356 09/12/2011 WEST COAST AUTO &TOWING, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130357 09/12/2011 ACTIVE NETWORK, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1
130358 09/12/2011 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check
130359 09/12/2011 ATASCADERO LAND PRESERVATION Accounts Payable Check 2
130360 09/12/2011 ATASCADERO UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST Accounts Payable Check 9
130361 09/12/2011 JIFFY LUBE Accounts Payable Check
130362 09/12/2011 KCI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130363 09/12/2011 MEDWORKS MEDICAL CENTER, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130364 09/12/2011 MOSS, LEVY, & HARTZHEIM LLP Accounts Payable Check 3
130365 09/12/2011 JAMES STEVEN ROBINSON DVM Accounts Payable Check 1
130366 09/12/2011 ATASCADERO MAIN STREET, INC. Accounts Payable Check 28
130367 09/12/2011 FLEET SERVICES-76 FLEET Accounts Payable Check 2
130368 09/12/2011 FLEET SERVICES-76 UNIVERSAL Accounts Payable Check 3
130369 09/16/2011 ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN, Payroll Vendor Payment
130370 09/16/2011 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment
130371 09/16/2011 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS Payroll Vendor Payment 1
130372 09/16/2011 AXA EQUITABLE Payroll Vendor Payment
130373 09/16/2011 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC. Payroll Vendor Payment 2
130374 09/16/2011 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC. Payroll Vendor Payment
130375 09/16/2011 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 8
130376 09/16/2011 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment
130377 09/16/2011 SEIU LOCAL 620 Payroll Vendor Payment
130378 09/16/2011 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 Payroll Vendor Payment
130379 09/16/2011 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 Payroll Vendor Payment 1
130383 09/16/2011 U.S. BANK Accounts Payable Check 16
130384 09/16/2011 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check
130385 09/16/2011 MINERS ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check
9'211']44` 11(/46217()44 C('lITT t-)'MDICAI CIDC S?_ CACCTV fn Aneni in4c C]� inhln f''hnnli
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2011
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Arno
130387 09/16/2011 BRIAN WESTERMAN Accounts Payable Check 1
130388 09/16/2011 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 1
130389 09/16/2011 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check
1004 09119/2011 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Payroll Vendor Payment
1005 09/20/2011 RABOBANK, N.A, Payroll Vendor Payment 4E
1008 09/20/2011 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1 12
1009 09/20/2011 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1
130390 09/21/2011 ALAN BAKER Accounts Payable Check
130391 09/21/2011 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check
130392 09/21/2011 HAMNER, JEWELL& ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 1
130393 09/21/2011 MADRONE LANDSCAPES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 7
1006 09/22/2011 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 4�
1007 09/22/2011 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEh Payroll Vendor Payment 61
130394 09/22/2011 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO Accounts Payable Check 12E
1010 09/26/2011 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON Accounts Payable Check 382
130395 09/26/2011 SDRMA Payroll Vendor Payment 131
130396 09/26/2011 MATTHEW R. AANERUD Accounts Payable Check
130397 09/26/2011 AFSS-SOUTHERN DIVISION Accounts Payable Check
130398 09/26/2011 AGP VIDEO, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130399 09/26/2011 AHERN RENTALS Accounts Payable Check
130400 09/26/2011 A-JAY EXCAVATING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 2
130401 09/26/2011 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC Accounts Payable Check
130402 09/26/2011 ALPHA FIRE SPRINKLER CORP. Accounts Payable Check 4
130403 09/26/2011 AMERICAN MARBORG Accounts Payable Check
130404 09/26/2011 AMERICAN WEST TIRE &AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 1
130405 09/26/2011 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check
130406 09/26/2011 PAULARANGORIN Accounts Payable Check
130407 09/26/2011 AT&T Accounts Payable Check
130408 09/26/2011 AT&T Accounts Payable Check
130411 09/26/2011 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 1
130412 09/26/2011 AT&T Accounts Payable Check
130414 09/26/2011 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 24
130415 09/26/2011 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 3
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2011
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amoi
130417 09/26/2011 JUSTIN BLACK Accounts Payable Check
130418 09/26/2011 BLUEPRINTER Accounts Payable Check
130419 09/26/2011 BMI Accounts Payable Check
130420 09/26/2011 BOETHING TREELAND FARMS, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130421 09/26/2011 AARON BROWN Accounts Payable Check
130422 09/26/2011 DANIEL L. BROWN Accounts Payable Check
130423 09/26/2011 BURKE,WILLIAMS, & SORENSON LLP Accounts Payable Check 3E
130424 09/26/2011 BURTON'S FIRE, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130425 09/26/2011 ROCKY J. BUSBY Accounts Payable Check
130426 09/26/2011 CALSENSE Accounts Payable Check
130427 09/26/2011 CED CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL Accounts Payable Check
130428 09/26/2011 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130429 09/26/2011 CLEARWATER COLOR NURSERY Accounts Payable Check
130430 09/26/2011 COLONY AUTO SERVICE, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130431 09126/2011 CORELOGIC INF. SOLUTIONS, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130432 09/26/2011 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check
130433 09/26/2011 CULLIGAN INDUSTRIAL WATER SYST Accounts Payable Check
130434 09/26/2011 MATTHEW J. CURRY Accounts Payable Check
130435 09/26/2011 CWEA MEMBERSHIP Accounts Payable Check
130436 09/26/2011 DARRYUS LOCK AND SAFE Accounts Payable Check
130437 09/26/2011 TRACI DECASTRO Accounts Payable Check
130438 09/26/2011 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check
130439 09/26/2011 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Accounts Payable Check 1
130440 09/26/2011 DIANI BUILDING CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 6 r
130441 09/26/2011 DISH NETWORK, LLC Accounts Payable Check
130442 09/26/2011 DOCUTEAM Accounts Payable Check
130443 09/26/2011 EIKHOF DESIGN GROUP, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130444 09/26/2011 ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS Accounts Payable Check 14
130445 09/26/2011 ESCUELA DEL RIO Accounts Payable Check
130446 09/26/2011 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check
130447 09/26/2011 FIRST TRANSIT, INC. Accounts Payable Check 2C
130448 09/26/2011 FLUID RESOURCE MANAGEMENT,INC. Accounts Payable Check
130449 09/26/2011 FRAZEE INDUSTRIES, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130450 09/26/2011 DAVID A. GARIBAY Accounts Payable Check
130451 09/26/2011 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check
130452 09/26/2011 ANDREW J. GEFTAKYS Accounts Payable Check
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2011
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description AmoE
130454 09/26/2011 GILBERTS LANDSCAPES Accounts Payable Check
130455 09/26/2011 GOPHER STOMPERS, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130456 09/26/2011 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check
130457 09/26/2011 HAMNER, JEWELL&ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 3
130458 09/26/2011 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT& COPY Accounts Payable Check
130459 09/26/2011 HOME DEPOT Accounts Payable Check
130460 09126/2011 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS Accounts Payable Check
130461 09/26/2011 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Accounts Payable Check
130462 09/26/2011 INGLIS PET HOTEL Accounts Payable Check
130463 09/26/2011 JAMES GARDINER ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 2
130464 09/2612011 JIFFY LUBE Accounts Payable Check
130465 09/26/2011 JK'S UNLIMITED Accounts Payable Check 1
130466 09/26/2011 JOEL SWITZER DIESEL REPAIR,INC Accounts Payable Check
130467 09/26/2011 JED H. JOYCE Accounts Payable Check
130468 09/26/2011 KANEY Accounts Payable Check
130469 09126/2011 KCI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130470 09126/2011 KNUCKLEHEAD GRAPHICS Accounts Payable Check
130471 09/26/2011 KPRL 1230 AM Accounts Payable Check
130472 09/26/2011 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO. INC Accounts Payable Check 2
130473 09/26/2011 JAMES R. LEWIS Accounts Payable Check
130474 09126/2011 LINKO DATA SYSTEMS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 5
130475 09/26/2011 MADRONE LANDSCAPES, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130476 09/26/2011 MAINLINE UTILITY CO. Accounts Payable Check 1
130477 09126/2011 MARCOR ENVIRONMENTAL, LP Accounts Payable Check 3
130478 09/26/2011 MICHAEL W, MERCHANT Accounts Payable Check 1
130479 09126/2011 METROPCS WIRELESS, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130480 09/26/2011 MICHAEL BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 87
130481 09/26/2011 MID-COAST GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1
130482 09/26/2011 MID-COAST MOWER & SAW, INC. Accounts Payable Check
130483 09/26/2011 MID-STATE SOLID WASTE& RECYCG Accounts Payable Check
130484 09/26/2011 MILLENNIUM CONSULTING ASSC, Accounts Payable Check
130485 09/26/2011 MINERS ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check
130486 09/26/2011 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check
130487 09/26/2011 MOSS, LEVY, & HARTZHEIM LLP Accounts Payable Check 6
130488 09/26/2011 DAVE MUEHLHAUSEN Accounts Payable Check
130489 09/26/2011 NATIONAL PEN CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2011
Check Check
Number Date Vendor Description Amot
130491 09/26/2011 OFFICE DEPOT INC. Accounts Payable Check 1
130492 09/26/2011 TARA ORLICK Accounts Payable Check
130493 09/26/2011 P,I.D.T.-PACIFIC INST OF Accounts Payable Check 1
130494 09/26/2011 PACE Accounts Payable Check
130497 09/26/2011 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 44
130498 09/26/2011 PASO ROBLES FORD LINCOLN MERC Accounts Payable Check
130499 09/26/2011 PASO ROBLES SAFE& LOCK Accounts Payable Check
130500 09/26/2011 PASO ROBLES TRUCK CENTER Accounts Payable Check
130501 09/26/2011 PASO ROBLES VET MEDICAL CLINIC Accounts Payable Check
130502 09126/2011 PC MECHANICAL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 7
130503 09/26/2011 PERRY'S ELECTRIC MOTORS & CTRL Accounts Payable Check 4
130504 09/26/2011 PERRY'S PARCEL& COURIER SVC Accounts Payable Check
130505 09/26/2011 PETTY CASH-FIRE DEPARTMENT Accounts Payable Check
130506 09/26/2011 CONNIE PILLSBURY Accounts Payable Check
130507 09/26/2011 JASON M, PLATZ Accounts Payable Check
130508 09/26/2011 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1
130509 09126/2011 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check
130510 09/26/2011 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 1C
130511 09/26/2011 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT Accounts Payable Check
130512 09/26/2011 ROB DAVIS BACKHOE Accounts Payable Check 5
130513 09/26/2011 ROSSI TRANSPORT SERVICE Accounts Payable Check
130514 09/26/2011 S.B.R.P.S.T.C. Accounts Payable Check
130515 09/26/2011 S.W. MARTIN &ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 31
130516 09/26/2011 SAN LUIS PERSONNEL INC. Accounts Payable Check
130517 09/26/2011 SAN LUIS POWERHOUSE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1
130518 09/26/2011 STEVE SANDEFFER Accounts Payable Check
130519 09/26/2011 SANTA LUCIA SPORTSMEN ASSC INC Accounts Payable Check
130520 09/26/2011 SCOTT O'BRIEN FIRE & SAFETY CO Accounts Payable Check
130521 09/26/2011 GEORGE SITYAVITZ Accounts Payable Check
130522 09/26/2011 SLO COUNTY SHERIFF Accounts Payable Check 4
130523 09/26/2011 SLO COUNTY SHERIFF Accounts Payable Check
130524 09/26/2011 DAVID L. SMAW Accounts Payable Check
130525 09/26/2011 STATE WATER RES CONTROL BOARD Accounts Payable Check
130526 09/26/2011 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1
130527 09/26/2011 SUPERIOR CRANI* &TRANSPORT Accounts Payable Check
130528 09/26/2011 TAC TEAM Accounts Payable Check
City of Atascadero
Disbursement Listing
For the Month of September 2011
Check Check
Number Cate Vendor Description Amoi
130530 09/26/2011 TOSTE CONSTRUCTION, INC. Accounts Payable Check 8
130531 09/26/2011 TRIBUNE Accounts Payable Check
130532 09/26/2011 DEREK TRINIDADE Accounts Payable Check
130533 09/2612011 ULTREX BUSINESS PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check
130534 09/26/2011 UNIVAR USA, INC. Accounts Payable Check 6
130535 09/26/2011 URBAN FUTURES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1
130536 09/26/2011 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check
130537 09/26/2011 IWINA M. VAN BEEK Accounts Payable Check
130538 09126/2011 RENE VASQUEZ Accounts Payable Check
130539 09/26/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check
130540 09/26/2011 VOICE PRINT INTERNATIONAL, INC Accounts Payable Check 17
130541 09126/2011 WALLACE GROUP Accounts Payable Check 7
130542 09/26/2011 WEST COVINA NURSERIES Accounts Payable Check
130543 09/26/2011 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check
130544 09/26/2011 WULFING`S BACKGROUND& POLYGR Accounts Payable Check
130545 09/26/2011 YESTERDAYS SPORTSWEAR Accounts Payable Check
1011 09/30/2011 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Payroll Vendor Payment
130546 09/30/2011 ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN. Payroll Vendor Payment
130547 09/30/2011 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment e
130548 09/30/2011 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment
130549 09/30/2011 SEIU LOCAL 620 Payroll Vendor Payment
130550 09/30/2011 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 Payroll Vendor Payment
130551 09130/2011 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 Payroll Vendor Payment 1
$ 2,051
ITEM NUMBER: A- 4
F 7,F15 �gi�pi�r fn tit 4
_em
M� DATE: 11/22/11
i979
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — Community Development Department
Change Order for Affordable Housing
Professional Services Consultant Contract
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Council:
1 . Authorize the City Manager to sign Change Order #1 in the amount of $40,000 to
extend the Urban Futures Incorporated for affordable housing on-call professional
services; and,
2. Authorize the Director of Administrative Services to appropriate $32,000 from the
Production of Affordable Units Fund for professional services related to the
Affordable Housing Assistance Strategy and related to producing affordable housing
units; and,
3. Authorize the Director of Administrative Services to appropriate $8,000 from the In
Lieu Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund for professional services related to the
Affordable Housing Assistance Strategy and related to producing affordable housing
units; and,
4. Authorize the City Manager to approve any minor additional change orders up to
$10,000 for affordable housing on-call professional services.
DISCUSSION:
Background: In September 2010, the Community Redevelopment Agency of
Atascadero (RDA) entered into a contract with Urban Futures Incorporated (UFI) for
"Affordable Housing On-call Professional Services" with a contract amount not to
exceed $39,999.00. The contract Scope of Work included analysis of options for the use
of RDA Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds (LMI funds) for property acquisition
and housing rehabilitation programs. Additional professional services related to
affordable housing and the RDA could be added later by contract change order.
In January 2011 , the Atascadero Redevelopment Agency contracted with the City of
Atascadero to have the City produce affordable housing units for the Agency. This
resulted in the transfer of the RDA's LMI funds to a restricted City fund. Funds in this
Production of Affordable Units Fund must be used to produce a contracted number of
units for the RDA and anv remainina funds at the end of the contract must be returned
ITEM NUMBER: A- 4
DATE: 11/22/11
to the RDA. These funds have the same restrictions and requirements as the original
RDA LMI funds.
On March 29, 2011 , the City Council and Redevelopment Agency Board held a joint
study session where UFI presented options for use of the LMI Housing Fund to provide
affordable housing in compliance with the California Community Redevelopment Law
requirements. The Council/Board identified priorities for the types of projects that would
be appropriate for the contracted LMI Housing Funds, and directed staff and the
consultant (UFI) to meet with affordable housing builders and non-profits to obtain
proposals for projects. Over the next several months, Staff and UFI met with housing
groups and reviewed proposals for consistency with State Affordable Housing Law and
the Council's/Agency's priorities.
In June 2011 , Governor Brown signed legislation that effectively dissolved
redevelopment agencies statewide and requires a special payment in order to re-
establish the agencies. This unprecedented and illegal action by the State significantly
complicated and slowed UFI's progress on the housing strategy. Due to UFI's expertise
on redevelopment agency issues, the City requested UFI prepare special analysis and
recommendations regarding the State's action. Together, these unexpected changes
have contributed to a need to increase the original contract amount.
Analysis: As a result of the State's redevelopment agency raid, and additional meetings
and project analysis requested by the Board/Council at the March 29, 2011 meeting,
UFI has performed services above the original 2010 contracted amount of $39,999.
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to sign a change
order in the amount of $40,000 to extend the UFI contract for affordable housing on-call
professional services. This would provide an increase of $40,000 above the original
Scope of Work for the additional meetings and project analysis which have been
completed to date, and to cover any future on-call affordable housing consulting
services by UFI which the City may need, as the RDA moves forward to allocate the
LMI funds.
Staff recommends that the Council make a finding consistent with the City's purchasing
policy to utilize an exception to the formal bidding process. Staff believes that due to
extenuating circumstances and UFI's experience with the City of Atascadero and
knowledge regarding redevelopment agency affordable housing issues, that UFI should
be allowed a contract extension. The extenuating circumstances that have significantly
slowed and complicated the process and led to the cost overrun on the original contract,
are the State of California's raid of Redevelopment Agency funds and the subsequent
Supreme Court stay.
ITEM NUMBER: A- 4
DATE: 11/22/11
Staff's recommendation is consistent with the formal bidding exception found in Section
II 3.1 .h.4 of the City of Atascadero Purchasing Policy listed below:
Section // 3. 1.h.4 — City of Atascadero Purchasing Policy
When there are extenuating circumstances that would make formal bidding not the most cost
effective approach. This often relates to qualitative, artistic or proprietary software/technological
issues. The appropriate department head shall prepare a report to Council[Board in this Case]
requesting an exemption from the formal bidding procedures.
An exception to the formal bidding process for an extension to UFI's contract can be
made as long as the Council makes the following findings in the affirmative:
1. The State of California's raid on Redevelopment Agency funds has created a
unique extenuating circumstance that created cost overruns to the original
contract. Since the consultant's work is 75% complete, formal bidding of the
remaining work is not the most cost effective approach.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of this recommendation will result in the additional expenditure of up to
$40,000 in affordable housing funds.
Based on the expected services to be provided, the proposed funding allocation is as
follows:
80 % Allocation Production of Affordable Housing Units Fund (contracted escrow $ 32,000
funds held by City. Originated from RDA Low/Moderate Income
Housing Funds)
20% Allocation In Lieu Low/Moderate Income Housing Funds $ 8,000
The $32,000 allocation from the Production of Affordable Units Fund has an element of
risk due to the on-going litigation regarding the State's confiscation of RDA funds. If the
State were to prevail and the contracted LMI funds were confiscated, then the City
would be obligated to back fill these funds. If this did occur, the City's In-Lieu
Low/Moderate Income Housing Funds could be used to cover any outstanding contract
obligations.
ITEM NUMBER: A- 4
DATE: 11/22/11
ALTERNATIVES:
1 . The Council could direct staff to bid the remainder of the work.
2. The Council could defer or discontinue work on the Affordable Housing Strategy.
ATTACHMENTS:
1 . Attachment 1 : January 14, 2011 RDA staff report.
2. Attachment 2: January 14, 2011 RDA / City agreement.
ITEM NUMBER: A- 5
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 1
Attachment 1: January 14, 2011 RDA staff report
OFT-Fr'. rn
1918 �; 197$r-7
`A�SCAUF,�,Oj
Community Redevelopment Agency of Atascadero
Staff Report — Executive Director
Production of 24 Affordable Housing Units Contract
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Agency Board:
1 . Adopt the Draft Resolution irrevocably allocating funds for the production of 24
affordable housing units; and
2. Authorize the Executive Director to execute a Financing Contract with the City of
Atascadero for the production of 24 affordable housing units.
DISCUSSION:
One of the fundamental purposes of redevelopment is to increase and improve the community's
supply of low and moderate income housing. In addition to being a purpose that is dictated by
the State Health and Safety Code, the Agency Board has indicated, through past actions, that
affordable housing is a priority.
Since the Board's adoption of the Housing Production Plan, 183 market rate residential dwelling
units have been constructed within the Redevelopment Agency Project Area, which requires
that 28 low to moderate income units be provided (11 very low income units and 17 low /
mnrlornfo inrnmo i inifcl Tho Anonry hnc thi is fnr cnnncnrorl fho nrnrli irtinn of fni it IAN xrory In\A/
ITEM NUMBER: A- 5
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 1
income units within the Project Area, which leaves a remaining obligation to produce twenty-four
(24) additional affordable housing units.
Section 33334.3 of the Health and Safety Code stipulates that the Agency may use Low /
Moderate Income Housing funds to pay for services provided through interagency agreements,
for the purpose of producing affordable housing units. Among the Board's past actions is the
adoption of an Affordable Housing Funds Policy, which allows the City to facilitate in the
financial participation of affordable housing projects. The City currently employs a staff of
professionals with a full range of skills and experience to manage the development of affordable
housing projects. The expertise of City staff is currently used by the Agency, as these
individuals have contacts in the community and can best ensure that the appropriate developers
are selected to build the required affordable housing units.
Affordable housing projects require land use entitlements, engineering, architecture,
construction, financing, and legal agreements. The City currently employs planners, civil
engineers, architectural plan checkers, building inspectors, finance experts, and attorneys that
have the experience and capability to implement any type and size of affordable housing
project. In the past 10 years, this staff has assisted in the development of the following
affordable projects:
• A 19 unit very low income senior housing project at 9705 El Camino Real in
partnership with the Housing Authority of San Luis Obispo (HASLO)
• A four (4) unit very low income housing project at 5440 Traffic Way in partnership
with Habitat for Humanity.
Due to this level and range of experience and expertise, City staff is able to best leverage the
affordable housing funds, making the City a proper entity to assist the Agency in providing
affordable housing.
In order to protect funding for the production of the remaining 24 affordable housing units, the
City and Agency need to formalize and document the Agency's commitment to complete the
project. Staff is recommending that the Board take the following two actions:
(1 ) Adopt the attached draft resolution approving the expenditure of Low /
Moderate Income Housing funds, approving the execution of the Financing
Contract irrevocably committing a total of $5,543,800 of these Agency funds
to the project.
(2) Authorize the Executive Director to execute a Financing Contract with the
City to provide funding for the completion of the project. This Contract
commits the Agency to pay a total of $5,543,800 for the production of the
remaining 24 affordable housing units. This commitment is a legally binding
financing agreement with the City and once pledged, cannot be reversed.
The Agency will not pay the City any additional administrative funds.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Fxnenditure of $5.333.800 in I_nw/MndPratA Incnme Hnusina funds_
ITEM NUMBER: A- 5
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 1
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Resolution
2. Draft Financing Contract - Production of 24 Affordable Housing Units
ITEM NUMBER: A- 5
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 1
RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF ATASCADERO,
CALIFORNIA, IRREVOCABLY ALLOCATING FUNDS
FOR THE PRODUCTION OF 24 AFFORDABLE
HOUSING UNITS
WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Atascadero (the "City") has adopted the
Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area (the "Redevelopment Plan"); and,
WHEREAS, the Community Redevelopment Agency of Atascadero (the "Agency") and
the Agency Board of Directors ("Board") is vested with responsibility pursuant to the
Community Redevelopment Law (Part 1 of Division 24 of Health and Safety Code of the State
of California) (the "Law") to implement the Redevelopment Plan in the Project Area; and,
WHEREAS, Sections 33000 et. seq. of the Law states that one of the fundamental
purposes of redevelopment is to increase and improve the community's supply of low and
moderate income housing; and,
WHEREAS, the Law requires that 20% of the tax increment revenues received by the
Agency be placed in a Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund ("LMIHF"). The LMIHF funds
are to be used to increase, improve and preserve the supply of low and moderate income housing
in the Project Area and within City limits (H&S 33334.2); and,
WHEREAS, The Agency must replace low and moderate income housing that is
removed as a result of a redevelopment project (the replacement rule, H&S 33413(a)); and,
WHEREAS, 15% of all housing constructed in a redevelopment project area must be
affordable to low and moderate-income persons and families (the inclusionary rule, H&S
33413(b)); and,
WHEREAS, the Law requires that each redevelopment agency shall adopt a Housing
Production Plan, in conjunction with its Implementation Plan, which is consistent with the
governing General Plan Housing Element. In addition, Sections 33413.5 and 33334.5 require
replacement housing plans for any units that will be demolished within the Project Area; and,
WHEREAS, on July 6, 1999, the Agency adopted the Housing Production Plan in
conjunction with its Implementation Plan, and amended it on June 10, 2008; and,
WHEREAS, on November 28, 2006, the Agency approved a funding request from
Habitat for Humanity; and,
WHEREAS, on November 27, 2007, the Agency authorized execution of an agreement
with Tierra West Advisors, LLC to provide affordable housing policy and strategy development
consultant services; and,
ITEM NUMBER: A- 5
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 1
WHEREAS, on November 25, 2008, the Agency adopted an Affordable Housing Funds
Policy (the "Housing Policy"), allowing the City to facilitate in the financial participation of
affordable housing projects; and,
WHEREAS, on December 8, 2009, the Agency appropriated $500,000 from the LMIHF
for the purpose of a loan program for downtown affordable housing and related retail uses,
finding the program consistent with the Housing Policy; and,
WHEREAS, on August 27, 2010, the Agency executed an agreement with Urban Futures
Inc. to provide affordable housing on-call professional services; and,
WHEREAS, since the Housing Production Plan's adoption, 183 market rate residential
dwelling units have been constructed within the Redevelopment Agency Project Area, which
requires that 28 low to moderate income units be provided (11 very low income units and 17 low
/moderate income units); and,
WHEREAS, the Agency has sponsored the production of four (4) very low income units
within the Project Area, which leaves a remaining obligation to produce twenty-four (24)
additional affordable housing units (the "Project"); and,
WHEREAS, the Project conforms to the General Plan of the City; and,
WHEREAS, the Agency may enter into a binding contract (the "Contract") with the City
pursuant to which the Agency will irrevocably commit the LMIHF funds to the Project and due
to the Agency's previous commitment to the Project as described above, the Agency desires to
do so; and,
WHEREAS, a staff report to the Agency at its meeting held on January 14, 2011 (the
"Staff Report," incorporated herein by reference), which sets forth fact supporting the findings
made in this Resolution pursuant to the Law, has been prepared to accompany this Resolution;
and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 33334.3 of the Law, the Agency may use LMIHF funds
to pay for services provided through interagency agreements, including usual indirect costs
related thereto, for the purpose of producing affordable housing units; and,
WHEREAS, the City provides a full staff of planning, construction and finance
professionals, who are experienced in the planning, financing and construction of affordable
housing projects.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Community Redevelopment Agency of
Atascadero:
ITEM NUMBER: A- 5
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 1
1. That the Agency reaffirms its financial commitment to the Project and desires that
the Project move forward in a manner that will most effectively comply with the
Housing Policy and the Housing Production Plan.
2. That the Board directs the Executive Director of the Agency to execute the
Contract with the City irrevocably committing LMIHF funds to the City for the
Project And requiring that the LMIHF funds be held in a separate account
("LMIHF account").
3. That the Board approves the expenditure of the LMIHF funds to enter into an
agreement with the City for the production of 24 affordable housing units, of
which seven (7) will be very low income units and seventeen (17) will be low /
moderate income units, as set forth in the contract, between the Agency and the
City and submitted to the Agency in connection with consideration of this
Resolution.
4. That the Agency authorizes the Executive Director of the Agency to segregate
$5,543,800 within the LMIHF accounts to be held in a separate LMIHF account
upon execution of the Agreement governing the use of and accounting for the
LMIHF funds.
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that this resolution will become
effective upon the effective date of approval by the Agency's Board of Directors.
On motion by Board Member and seconded by Board Member
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF ATASCADERO
By:
Roberta Fonzi, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C.,
Board Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Brian A. Pierik, Agency General Counsel
ITEM NUMBER: A- 5
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 2
Attachment 2: January 14, 2011 RDA/ City agreement
FINANCING CONTRACT
PRODUCTION OF 24 AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS
THIS FINANCING CONTRACT ("Contract") is made and entered into this 14th day of
January, 2011 by and between the CITY OF ATASCADERO, a general law city and municipal
corporation ("City") and the COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
ATASCADERO, a public body, corporate and politic ("Agency"). Hereinafter, City and Agency
shall be referred to collectively as the "Parties" and singularly as the "Party."
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City Council previously adopted a Redevelopment Plan (the
"Redevelopment Plan") for a redevelopment project area (the "Project Area"); and,
WHEREAS, the Agency is vested with responsibility pursuant to the Community
Redevelopment Law (Part 1 of Division 24 of Health and Safety Code of the State of California)
(the "Law") to implement the Redevelopment Plan both within and without the Project Area;
and,
WHEREAS, Sections 33000 et. seq. of the Law states that one of the fundamental
purposes of redevelopment is to increase and improve the community's supply of low and
moderate income housing; and,
WHEREAS, the Law requires that 20% of the tax increment revenues received by the
Agency be placed in a Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund ("LMIHF"). The LMIHF funds
are to be used to increase, improve and preserve the supply of low and moderate income housing
in the Project Area and within City limits (H&S 33334.2); and,
WHEREAS, The Agency must replace low and moderate income housing that is
removed as a result of a redevelopment project (the replacement rule, H&S 33413(a)); and,
WHEREAS, 15% of all housing constructed in a redevelopment project area must be
affordable to low and moderate-income persons and families (the inclusionary rule, H&S
33413(b)); and,
WHEREAS, the Law requires that each redevelopment agency shall adopt a Housing
Production Plan, in conjunction with its Implementation Plan, which is consistent with the
governing General Plan Housing Element. In addition, Sections 33413.5 and 33334.5 require
replacement housing plans for any units that will be demolished within the Project Area; and,
WHEREAS, since the Housing Production Plan's adoption, 183 market rate residential
A—_11— —4, U--- --, +_-+_A _4U.r +t- A ___- D--;--+ A--- —U-1,
ITEM NUMBER: A- 5
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 2
requires that 28 low to moderate income units be provided (11 very low income units and 17 low
/ moderate income units); and,
WHEREAS, the Agency has sponsored the production of four (4) very low income units
within the Project Area, which leaves a remaining obligation to produce twenty-four (24)
additional affordable housing units (the "Project"); and,
WHEREAS, the Project conforms to the General Plan of the City; and,
WHEREAS, the Agency is authorized by the California Redevelopment Law to enter into
a binding contract with the City pursuant to which the Agency will irrevocably commit the
LMIHF funds to the Project and due to the Agency's previous commitment to the Project the
Agency intends to provide funding in the amount of $5,543,800.00 ("the LMIHF Funds") to
assist the City with the cost of the Project because the Project will directly benefit the Project
Area; and,
WHEREAS, the City provides a full staff of planning, construction and finance
professionals, who are experienced in the planning, financing and construction of affordable
housing projects; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 33334.3 of the Law, the Agency may use LMIHF funds
to pay for services provided through interagency agreements, including usual indirect costs
related thereto, for the purpose of producing affordable housing units; and,
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public meeting of the Agency was held on January 14, 2011
wherein the Agency adopted Resolution No. making all required findings for the use
of the LMIHF Funds for the Project pursuant to Section 33445.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto state and agree as follows:
1. The purpose of this Contract is to set forth the understanding and agreement of the
Parties with respect to the Agency's commitment to fund the Project through reimbursement of
the City's share of Project costs, up to a defined amount. The contents of this Contract are
intended to be as comprehensive as possible with respect to the Agency's commitment of
LMIHF Funds (as defined in paragraph 3 of this contract) to the Project yet not exhaustive with
respect to additional issues and expenses that may arise relative to the development of the
Project. In the event that issues and expenses occur that are not identified in this Contract, the
Parties agree to work together in good faith to resolve each matter.
2. The Agency anticipates that the Project will address the goals and objectives of
the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area and will be of benefit to the Project Area by
increase, improving and preserving the supply of low and moderate income housing in the
Project Area and within City limits. The Agency has agreed to commit a total sum of five
million five hundred forty-three thousand eight hundred dollars and no cents ($5,543,800.00)
("LMIHF Funds") to the Project to pay for the Project's direct benefit to the Project Area.
Within thirty ('101 h„cinPcc d vc of the Partiec eXPrntina thic Cnntrart Acwnry
ITEM NUMBER: A- 5
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 2
shall segregate the sum of five million five hundred forty-three thousand eight hundred dollars
and no cents ($5,543,800.00) within the Agency's accounts to be held in a separate account
("LMIHF Account") to pay the Project costs. The Agency Funds shall be held in the LMIHF
Account until 2 months from the latest of the date the project is completed or the date of the final
invoice. The City shall request reimbursement from the Agency for Project costs actually
incurred and the Agency shall reimburse the City from the LMIHF Funds from the LMIHF
Account.
4. In contemplation of the provisions of Section 895.2 of the California Government
Code imposing certain tort liability jointly upon public entities solely by reason of such entities
being Parties to an agreement as defined in Section 895 of said code, the Parties hereto, as
between themselves pursuant to the authorization contained in Sections 895.2 and 895.6 of said
code, will each assume the full liability imposed upon it or any of its officers, agents or
employees by law for personal injury, property damage or loss to third Parties caused by a
negligent or wrongful act or omission of that party occurring in the performance of the Contract.
To achieve the above stated purpose, each party indemnifies and holds harmless the other party
for any damage, loss, cost or expense arising out of its own negligent or wrongful acts or
omissions.
5. These obligations, as set forth herein, are binding on the successors, assigns or
heirs, including any private or public entities, of both parties.
6. This Contract shall be governed by the laws of California and represents the entire
agreement of the Parties as to the subject matter of this Contract.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Agency have approved the foregoing
FINANCING CONTRACT effective January 14, 2011, and caused the same to be executed by
their duly authorized officers as set forth below.
AGENCY CITY
By: By:
Wade G. McKinney Wade G. McKinney
Executive Director City Manager
ATTEST: ATTEST:
By: By:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C. Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C.
Board Secretary City Clerk
Date: Date:
ITEM NUMBER: A- 5
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 2
APPROVED AS TO FORM APPROVED AS TO FORM
Community Redevelopment Agency City of Atascadero
of Atascadero
By: By:
Brian A. Pierik, Agency General Counsel Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney
ITEM NUMBER: A- 5
DATE: 11/22/2011
, 1
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — Police Department
Integrated Police Mobile Data Computer Systems
and Interview Room Surveillance System
RECOMMENDATION:
Council award purchase to Coban Technologies in the amount of $156,258.77 for nine
(9) mobile data computers with integrated in-car video, three (3) integrated automatic
license plate readers and one interview room surveillance system.
DISCUSSION:
The Police Department's patrol vehicles are equipped with in-car video and mobile data
computers. Both have either reached or surpassed their recommended life span and
are in need of replacement. Both SLESF funds and Technology replacement funds
have been budgeted for this replacement.
In accordance with Section 111.3 of the purchasing policy, a selection committee has
been evaluating in-car video systems, mobile data computers and tablet computers for
approximately one year. Rather than opting to purchase separate products from
different vendors, the committee narrowed its focus on an integrated solution from a
single vendor. Coban Technologies was selected over two other vendors offering two
more expensive products.
The selected solution is ideal for the City and Police Department for several reasons:
• The system is Microsoft server-based, simplifying integration, and is the
preferred operating system of the City's Technology Department.
• Staff can manage the behavior of the units in the cars and perform system
updates without having to go from car to car to make the changes.
• A single computer operates the camera system.
• The selected solution has a faster processor than other products.
• This product has a fully developed backend solution. It provided the most control
over evidence, its management, and the management of policies related to
operations and evidence.
ITEM NUMBER: A- 5
DATE: 11/22/2011
• If the manufacturer should go out of business anytime in the future, all files and
evidence would continue to be available due to the products "open architecture"
system.
Additionally, the Police Department Interview Room Surveillance System is antiquated
and in need of replacement. Coban manufactures a contemporary digital system that is
both desirable to staff and more affordable than comparable systems examined. This
system is also preferable as it would integrate seamlessly with the in-unit video system
and backend server. Other vendors examined would necessitate the purchase of an
additional server and evidence management software to manage the videos.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact of this project is $156,258.77 in budgeted funds as follows:
Project Funding Uses:
Purchase of equipment $ (156,258.77)
Total Project Uses $ (156,258.77)
Project Funding Sources:
2010/2011 SLESF Grant: In-Car Video Cameras $ 82,000.00
2011/2011 SLESF Grant: Integrated Mobile Data Computers $ 37,000.00
2011/2012 SLESF Grant: Surviellance Equipment $ 16,000.00
Technology Equipment& Replacement Fund-Mobile Data Computer $ 35,000.00
Total Project Funding Sources $ 170,000.00
Total surplus budget for project: $ 13,741.23
ALTERNATIVES:
1 . Council could not award the purchase to Coban Technologies at this time and
direct staff to look for alternate vendors or equipment. This option is not
recommended as an extensive search was conducted to find the right systems
"fit" for the department.
2. Council could decide not to replace the mobile data computer systems, the in-car
video systems and the other needed equipment. This option is not
recommended as the equipment increases the efficiency of the department and
helps protect the City from future liabilities.
ATTACHMENTS: None
ITEM NUMBER: A-6
DATE: 11/22/11
1918 0 1978
�ATAsrAn�O/i
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — Community Development Department
Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) License
To Serve Beer and Wine
PLN 2011-1423 / ABC 2011-0014
6005 EI Camino Real
(Colby Jack Cafe, Inc.)
(Request to allow an Alcoholic Beverage Control license for the
on-site sale of beer and wine at the new Colby Jack Cafe at the Carlton Hotel)
RECOMMENDATION:
Council adopt Draft Resolution A finding that public convenience or necessity would b
served by allowing the issuance of a Type 41 ABC license for the on-site sale of beer ani
wine at Colby Jack Cafe, Inc. 6005 EI Camino Real.
DISCUSSION:
The applicant has applied through the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) for
Type 41 license for the on-site sale of beer and wine. ABC defines a Type 41 license as:
ON SALE BEER & WINE — EATING PLACE - (Restaurant) Authorizes the sale of bee
and wine for consumption on or off the premises where sold. Distilled spirits may not be o
the premises (except brandy, rum, or liqueurs for use solely for cooking purposes). Mu:
operate and maintain the licensed premises as a bona fide eating place. Must maintain suitabl
kitchen facilities, and must make actual and substantial sales of meals for consumption on th
premises. Minors are allowed on the premises.
The applicant is moving their business to the Carlton Hotel, and is requesting an AB(
license in order to serve beer and wine at their restaurant in the new location.
ITEM NUMBER: A-6
DATE: 11/22/11
The site is zoned (DC) Downtown Commercial and has a General Plan Land Usl
Designation of (D) Downtown. Restaurants are an allowed use in the Downtowi
Commercial zone. Restaurants may serve alcohol as part of the permitted eating ani
drinking use without additional use approvals per the Atascadero Zoning Ordinance.
Analysis: ABC requires a letter of convenience from the City in order to issue a new bee
and wine license at this location. Section 23958.4 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Ac
requires the local governing body of the area to determine that the license will serve publi
convenience or necessity. This process is only required when it is found that "Undue
Concentration" of liquor licenses exists within the area. In this case, the Department c
Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) has identified that there is an undue concentration c
liquor licenses within the area. The proposed site is located in census tract numbe
0125.02, which allows up to twelve (12) ABC licenses within the area without Counc
review. There are currently fifteen (15) licenses existing within the census tract, an
therefore ABC requires a finding of public convenience or necessity from the locE
governing body (City Council) in order to issue a new license.
The Atascadero Police Department has reviewed the proposed application has does nc
have any concerns or opposition regarding the issuance of an additional license at thi
location for the proposed business.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1 . Location Map
2. Draft Resolution A
Attachment
Attachment 1: Location Map
m�
P �
o /
Y
Add
i
�aq�e
/ am
/ Q /
a'D
Colby Jack Cafe
6005 EI Camino Real
APN 029-342-023
i
i
i
a
�o.
01
q0
7
9
Y��7
Attachment ;
Attachment 2: Resolution A
DRAFT RESOLUTION A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT A
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE WILL BE SERVED BY ALLOWING THE
ISSUANCE OF A TYPE 41 ABC LICENSE AT 6005 EL CAMINO REAL
ON APN 029-342-023
(COLBY JACK CAFE, INC.)
WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jack and Natalie Dorris (Colby Jac
Cafe, Inc, 6005 El Camino Real, Atascadero CA 93422) Business Owner and Applicant, to reque:
that the Council make a finding or public convenience or necessity to allow the department c
Alcoholic Beverage Control to issue a Type 41 license for on-site sale of beer and wine at a a
existing restaurant at 6005 El Camino Real, (APN 029-342-023); and,
WHEREAS, the site's current General Plan Designation is D (Downtown); and,
WHEREAS, the site's current Zoning Designation is DC (Downtown Commercial); and,
WHEREAS, the Atascadero Police Department has reviewed the requested Type 41 on-sal
beer and wine license and does not believe it presents any public safety concerns; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that public convenience or necessity will b
served by the issuance of a Type 41 on-sale beer and wine license for an existing restaurant at 6005 F
Camino Real; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero considered the proposed applicatio
at a public meeting on November 22, 2011; and,
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, hereby resolves to approv
PLN 2011-1423.
Attachment ;
On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member
the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO
By:
Tom O'Malley, Mayor
ATTEST:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
� I-
�
197e,-7
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — Community Development Department
Title 8 Building Code Text Amendment
Dormant Building Permit Application Extension Program
Phase 4 Option
RECOMMENDATION:
Council introduce for first reading by title only, Draft Ordinance A to create a Phase 4
Dormant Building Permit Program consistent with staff's recommendations.
DISCUSSION:
Background: Dormant building permit applications are applications that have not
complied with the processing timeframes as stated in the Atascadero Municipal Code
(8-2.102) and as referenced below:
105.3.2 Time limitation of application.
1. Expiration of Plan Review. Applications for which no permit is issued within 180
days following date of notification of approval/ready for issuance by the Building Division,
or applications within 180 days following date of notification of permit corrections to be
picked up or returned, shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for
review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building official.
In September of 2008, Council approved Dormant Building Permit Application Extension
Program Phase 1 . Phase 1 required project owners to pay all outstanding plan check
fees by February 28, 2009, and pay all additional fees and secure the permit by June
30, 2010. This program extended the life of 458 dormant permit applications. Project
owners were informed that this would be a one-time-only program, and the ramification
of not participating was that the permit application would be cancelled and all
outstanding plan check fees would be required to be paid. Unpaid fees would be sent to
a collection agency. Owners of 214 permit applications participated in Phase 1 , and
$211 ,660 in outstanding plan check fees were paid.
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
In June of 2009, Council approved Dormant Building Permit Application Program Phase
2. This second phase of the program was designed to keep the remaining 292 project
applications that did not participate in Phase 1 viable. Phase 2 required all outstanding
permit fees be paid by June 30, 2010, and project plans be updated to the current
Building Code by June 30, 2010. The deadline for picking up permits under Phase 2
was June 30, 2010. The Phase 2 program had limited participation.
In June of 2010, Council approved Dormant Building Permit Application Program Phase
3. This latest phase required all outstanding plan check fees be paid and all plans be
brought up to current building code by December 31 , 2011 . The third phase of the
Program provided permit applications from both Phase 1 and Phase 2 with an additional
18 months before expiration. Phase 3 modified Phase 1 and Phase 2 as follows:
• Phase 1 : Projects that participated in Phase 1 and paid all outstanding plan
check were allowed an extended deadline, up December 31 , 2010, to start
construction on the project. After June 30, 2010, a $150 processing fee was
added to cover the cost of staff time.
• Phase 2: Projects that were in Phase 2 but had not recorded any progress
pursuant to the Dormant Permit Application Program were allowed an extended
timeframe to December 31 , 2011 .
Summary of Previous Permit Extension Programs
Time Frame Phase 1 Permits Phase 2 Permits
Expires June 30, • Deferred outstanding plan
2010 All outstanding plan check check fees
fees had to be paid . All plans must be brought
up to current code
Phase 3 Permits (Current Program)
July 1, 2010 to • Deferred outstanding plan
June 30, 2011 Phase I permits may be check fees
issued . All plans must be brought
• $150 processing fee up to current code
• $150 processing fee
July 1 to All Phase 1 and 2 permits must be brought up to the 2011
December 31, 2011 building code.
• All outstanding plan check fees must be paid.
• $150 processing fee
January 1, 2012 All permits expired
• Outstanding plan check fees turned over for collections
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
At this time, 357 permits remain in the Dormant Permit Application Extension Program.
These projects range from individual single family homes to large residential master
planned subdivision tracts. Many of these projects have the potential to bring valuable
new housing to the community as well as stimulate the local economy. On the other
hand, some projects are unlikely to be constructed, and divert staff efforts away from
other projects.
Staff is proposing that Council adopt Phase 4 of the Program that would provide an
addition two-year extension with the same rules as Phase 3. As part of Phase 4, staff is
recommending time extensions be limited to certain dormant projects that have the
possibility of being constructed, while permits that no longer appear viable be cancelled.
Permit Extension Criteria
Projects to be extended under Phase 4 have been selected based on the following
criteria (refer to Attachments 2a and 2b for permit lists):
Extend Permits (2a) Cancelled Permits (2b)
Status of Recorded final map or active Expired tentative map
subdivision maps tentative map
Scope of project Part of master plan of Stand-alone project, individual
development single-family residence
Status of other Part of ongoing project, No permits have been pulled,
permits within same partially constructed project no activity on associated
project permits
Information from Interest in developing No interest or capability to
property owner develop now or in near future
Based on the above criteria, staff recommends that 265 individual permits (27 separate
projects), be extended under Phase 4 until December 31 , 2013. The remaining 92
dormant permits under the existing Phase 3 timeline would expire on December 31 ,
2011 .
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
Time Extension Benefits
There are a number of benefits to the Phase 4 of the Dormant Building Permit
Application Extension Program:
• It allows time for owners and potential investors to analyze the project for viability
and work out potential financing.
• It allows planning entitlements, development impact fees, and AMWC meter fees
to remain in effect based on date of project application.
• It provides additional opportunity to recover outstanding plan check fees still
owed to the City.
• It provides that these remaining projects, if built out, will be constructed based on
current building code requirements.
• It cancels non-viable old permits, providing the opportunity for new projects to be
developed.
Conclusion
Staff recognizes the need to support viable construction projects and keep permits
active in an effort to produce quality, code compliant development throughout the City.
A new Phase 4 of the Dormant Building Permit Application Extension Program would
extend permit expiration dates, allowing additional time for select major projects to build
out.
As part of the proposed Phase 4 of the Program, dormant permits will be canceled that
no longer appear viable. Outstanding fees that remain on these permits will be turned
over to collections.
FISCAL IMPACT:
A total of $440,000± in outstanding plan check fees remain due for all dormant permit
applications remaining from Phase 3. Seventy-five (75) of the permit applications in
Phase 3 will be canceled if permits are not issued by December 31 , 2011 , which means
that outstanding plan check fees in the amount of $79,000± would be turned over to
collections. Through Phase 4, it is likely that between 25-50% of the remaining
$361 ,000± in outstanding plan check fees will be collected by the City.
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
ALTERNATIVES:
1 . The Council could take no action and thereby allow all permits currently in Phase
3 of the Dormant Building Permit Application Extension Program to expire on
December 31 , 2011 . Staff would cancel all remaining dormant permit applications
and turn over outstanding plan check fees to collections.
2. The Council could make changes to the recommended Dormant Building Permit
Application Extension Program Phase 4.
3. The Council could refer the item back to staff for additional analysis.
ATTACHMENTS:
1 . Draft Ordinance A Modifying Title 8 Section 105.3.2.3
2. Dormant Spreadsheets
2a) Permits to extend
2b) Permits to cancel
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 1
Attachment 1: Draft Ordinance A
DRAFT ORDINANCE A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE
ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE BY REPLACING
SECTIONS 8-2.102(C) AND 8-2.102(E)
OF THE LOCAL BUILDING CODE
The City Council hereby fords and declares as follows:
WHEREAS, the National, State and local economy have experienced a significant
economic downturn from 2007 to 2011; and,
WHEREAS, this economic downturn has had a considerable negative effect on the
construction industry, especially the local residential construction sector; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero now has a backlog of over 350 building permit
applications for new residential and commercial projects with outstanding plan check fees of
over $450,000; and,
WHEREAS, the building code requires building permit applications to be deemed
abandoned after 180 days of inactivity; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council determined that it was in the economic interests of the
City of Atascadero to provide relief to the construction industry by extending the permit
extension deadlines; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved a Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 Dormant
Building Permit Application Extension Program that will expire on January 1, 2012, and
WHEREAS, staff has prepared a Phase 4 Dormant Permit Application Extension
Program code text amendment that would provide an addition time extension to inactive building
permit application; and,
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 1
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1:
Section 8-2.102(c) of the Atascadero Municipal Code is amended to read as follows:
105.3.2 Time limitation of application.
(a) --: Expiration of Plan Review. Applications for which no permit is issued
within 180 days following date of notification of approval/ready for
issuance by the Building Division, or applications within 180 days
following date of notification of permit corrections to be picked up or
returned, shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for
review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the
building official. In order to renew action on an application after
expiration, the applicant shall resubmit plans and pay a new plan review
fee. No extension is allowed except by written appeal to the Building
Official. The Building Official is authorized to grant one extension of time
for an additional period not exceeding 180 days. No application shall be
extended more than once.
(b) -2-. Fee refund. Application fees and permit fees are assessed to cover the
cost of providing permit issuance services and therefore are not refundable
once service has been obtained. A full refund (100%) can only be given
when a cancelled application was submitted and/or reviewed due to staff
error. Refunds for cancelled applications will not include submittal fees,
document imaging fees, and plan review fees (once a plan review has been
completed). Refunds must be requested in writing and within one (1) year
of application submittal date. Refunds for cancelled permits will include
up to 80% of the permit fee, provided no work has commenced and the
request for refund is within one (1) year from permit issuance. Refunds
must be requested in writing and within one (1) year of permit issuance.
Refunds will not be processed for applications and/or permits that have
been suspended or revoked, or that have expired due to limitation.
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 1
industrial addition, submitted to the City of Ataseader-o on oF b
Septembe ' 2008' may pt into n e time Only p inntio extension. I
7
all oiitstanding plan eheek fees
must be paid i,, full or-before Fevfuafy 28, 2009, n,-,.a n subsequent
fees.issued on or-before june 30, 2010. Any building permit appheation o
subsequent buildin,' .-gulated by this pr-ogr-atn that does not fneet.
new plans, and new plan eheek and pefmit
(c) Phase IV — 2012 Dormant Building Permit Application Extension
Program.
In addition to the processing timeframes provided for in Section 105.3.2.1,
select dormant permit applications currently covered in Dormant Permit
Application Extension Program Phase III shall be provided application
extensions consistent with the following:
1. Dormant permits selected to be part of Phase IV:
a. Permit applications ,granted an additional time extension under
Phase IV are to be selected based on the following
qualifications:
i. Status of subdivision map
ii. Scope of project
iii. Status of other permits within the same project
iv. Information from property owner
b. Building permit applications that are included in Phase IV
Dormant Building Permit Application Extension Program are
extended to December 31, 2013 provided that prior to
issuance, (1) all outstanding_plan check fees are paid, (2)a
$150.00 processing fee is paid, and (3) building construction
plans have been revised to meet the current Building Code
requirements.
c. Phase IV dormant permit applications that have not been issued
by December 31, 2013 will become null and void, and all
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 1
unpaid fees for services rendered will be due to the City of
Atascadero in full.
2. Dormant permits not selected to be part of Phase IV: Building
permit applications that have not been issued by December 31,
2011 will become null and void, and all unpaid fees for services
rendered will be due to the City of Atascadero in full.
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 2a
Attachment 2a: Dormant Spreadsheet, Permits to Extend
Address Street Owner Description Cancel Fees Issue Fees Map Status
12715 Escabroso Castlerock/31'Meadows SFR 2,066.91
12628 Cabazon Castlerock/31'Meadows SFR 1,867.11
12630 Cabazon Castlerock/31'Meadows SFR 1,505.91
12660 Cabazon Castlerock/31'Meadows SFR 1,564.71
12680 Cabazon Castlerock/31'Meadows SFR 1,731.71
San Marcos Castlerock/31'Meadows Stock 9,813.66
San Marcos Castlerock/31'Meadows Stock#19 1,447.58
19,997.59 -
Andy Charnley Stock Review 1,683.57 7,170.34 TTM 2003-0029 EXP 11/21/2013
9425 La Quinta Andy Charnley SFR 1,937.13 17,277.95 TTM 2003-0029 EXP 11/21/2013
9435 La Quinta Andy Charnley SFR 1,732.95 17,581.26 TTM 2003-0029 EXP 11/21/2013
9445 La Quinta Andy Charnley SFR 998.56 16,209.38 TTM 2003-0029 EXP 11/21/2013
9455 La Quinta Andy Charnley SFR 1,732.95 17,622.72 TTM 2003-0029 EXP 11/21/2013
9465 La Quinta Andy Charnley SFR 998.56 16,209.38 TTM 2003-0029 EXP 11/21/2013
9475 La Quinta Andy Charnley SFR 1,724.78 17,733.19 TTM 2003-0029 EXP 11/21/2013
9485 La Quinta Andy Charnley SFR 1,807.13 17,017.95 TTM 2003-0029 EXP 11/21/2013
9495 La Quinta Andy Charnley SFR 1,772.07 15,023.21 TTM 2003-0029 EXP 11/21/2013
14,387.70 141,845.38
9160 Seville JRM Enterprises Bldg"D" 6,441.00 - TM 2624 FINALED
11260 Pamplona JRM Enterprises Bldg"E" 3,113.47 TM 2624 FINALED
11220 Pamplona JRM Enterprises Bldg"F" 3,234.76 TM 2624 FINALED
0 JRM Enterprises Bldg"G" - TM 2624 FINALED
0 JRM Enterprises Bldg"H" TM 2624 FINALED
11200 Pamplona JRM Enterprises Bldg"I" TM 2624 FINALED
0 JRM Enterprises Bldg"J" TM 2624 FINALED
0 JRM Enterprises Bldg"K" - TM 2624 FINALED
11204 Madrid JRM Enterprises Bldg"L" 5,121.80 TM 2624 FINALED
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 2a
19,812.82 -
0 STOCK PLAN WEHN UnitA 1,149.43 1,149.44 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
0 STOCK PLAN WEHN Unit A-Reverse 1,149.43 1,149.43 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
0 STOCK PLAN WEHN Unit B 1,148.40 1,148.40 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
0 STOCK PLAN WEHN Unit B-Reverse 1,148.40 1,148.40 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
0 STOCK PLAN WEHN Unit C 1,303.68 1,303.68 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
0 STOCK PLAN WEHN Unit C-Reverse 1,303.68 1,303.68 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 12 - - FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 13 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 14 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 15 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 16 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 17 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 18 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 19 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 20 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 21 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 22 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 23 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 24 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 25 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 26 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 27 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 28 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 29 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 30 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 31 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 32 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 33 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 34 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 35 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 36 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 37 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 38 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 2a
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 39 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 40 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 41 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 42 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 43 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 44 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 45 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 46 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 47 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 48 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 49 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 50 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 51 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 52 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 53 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 54 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 55 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 56 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 57 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 58 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 59 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 60 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 61 FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
1155 ECR Ruth Wehn Unit 62 - - FMP-2006-0130 EXP 8/9/2014
7,203.02 7,203.03
LOT 23 Regio Fetyko/Doya Relocate SFR 952.30 1/0/1900
5457 Atalaya Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR 1,425.98 24,746.93
5461 Atalaya Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR 1,573.40 25,283.59
5453 Atalaya Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR 1,447.82 24,798.26
5447 Atalaya Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR 1,595.24 25,144.90
5441 Atalaya Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR 1,573.40 25,093.57
5435 Atalaya Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR 1,447.82 24,798.26
need options to
5427 Atalaya Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR calc fees
5423 Atalaya Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR 1,573.40 25,093.59
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 2a
5421 Atalaya Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR 1,425.98 24,746.93
need options to
5419 Atalaya Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR calc fees
1281 Copado Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR 1,573.40 25,093.59
1275 Copado Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR 1,425.98 24,746.93
1271 Copado Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR 1,447.82 24,798.26
1265 Copado Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR 1,573.40 25,093.57
5416 Atalaya Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR 1,447.82 24,798.26
5420 Atalaya Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR 1,573.40 25,093.59
5424 Atalaya Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR 1,573.40 25,093.57
5428 Atalaya Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR 1,447.82 24,798.26
5432 Atalaya Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR 1,573.40 25,093.57
5436 Atalaya Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR 1,447.82 24,798.26
need options to
5444 Atalaya Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR calc fees
5448 Atalaya Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR 1,425.98 24,746.93
5454 Atalaya Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR 1,573.40 25,093.59
5456 Atalaya Fetyko/ECR 24 SFR 1,447.82 24,798.26
1225 ECR Fetyko/Doya STOCK,1602R 545.25 545.25
1225 ECR Fetyko/Doya STOCK,1602R 23.50 23.50
1225 ECR Fetyko/Doya STOCK,689 325.25 325.25
1225 ECR Fetyko/Doya STOCK,1328R 671.14 671.14
34,111.94 525,317.81
0 Halcon Hertel/Atas Town Homes Pool House 622.16 TTM-2007-0100 EXP 2/19/2013
9355-9363 Ranada Hertel/Atas Town Homes Townhomes 9701.23 29443.62 TTM-2007-0100 EXP 2/19/2013
9360-9368 Riberena Hertel/Atas Town Homes Townhomes 4083.51 27088.48 TTM-2007-0100 EXP 2/19/2013
9361-9369 Riberena Hertel/Atas Town Homes Townhomes 4107.73 29433.48 TTM-2007-0100 EXP 2/19/2013
9371-9379 Codencia Herte l/Atas Town Homes Townhomes 4703.16 30729.41 TTM-2007-0100 EXP 2/19/2013
9381-9389 Cielo Azul Hertel/Atas Town Homes Townhomes 4107.73 29433.48 TTM-2007-0100 EXP 2/19/2013
9380-9388 Cielo Azul Hertel/Atas Town Homes Townhomes 4317.73 21163.62 TTM-2007-0100 EXP 2/19/2013
9341-9359 Dechado Hertel/Atas Town Homes Apartments 3882.56 41929.73 TTM-2007-0100 EXP 2/19/2013
9281-9299 Ciruela Hertel/Atas Town Homes Apartments 5682.56 43729.73 TTM-2007-0100 EXP 2/19/2013
9250-9568 Ciruela Hertel/Atas Town Homes Apartments 5682.56 43729.73 TTM-2007-0100 EXP 2/19/2013
9301-9319 Dechado Hertel/Atas Town Homes Apartments 5682.56 43729.73 TTM-2007-0100 EXP 2/19/2013
9280-9298 Ciruela Hertel/Atas Town Homes Apartments 5678.02 37585.13 TTM-2007-0100 EXP 2/19/2013
9321-9339 Dechado Hertel/Atas Town Homes Apartments 5678.02 43702.06 TTM-2007-0100 EXP 2/19/2013
9210-9228 Ciruela Hertel/Atas Town Homes Apartments 5678.02 43702.06 TTM-2007-0100 EXP 2/19/2013
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 2a
9230-9248 Ciruela Hertel/Atas Town Homes Apartments 5,682.56 43,729.73 TTM-2007-0100 EXP 2/19/2013
9550 Via Cielo Hertel/Atas Town Homes SFR 1,901.29 12,930.67
11457 Monte Verde Hertel/Atas Town Homes 2nd Unit 1,368.11 10,486.96
9660 Via Cielo Hertel/Atas Town Homes 2nd Unit 806.91 9,352.53
9658 Via Cielo Hertel/Atas Town Homes SFR 1,845.45 15,924.33
9505 Via Cielo Hertel/Atas Town Homes SFR 1,697.97 14,550.95
88,592.40 616,105.16
11105 Avion Trimark SFR 475.43 - TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11165 Eliano Trimark SFR 475.43 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11100 Avion Trimark SFR 475.43 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11105 Eliano Trimark SFR 475.43 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11115 Avion Trimark SFR 791.90 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11110 Avion Trimark SFR 791.90 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11185 Eliano Trimark SFR 791.90 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11125 Eliano Trimark SFR 791.90 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11115 Eliano Trimark SFR 682.88 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11290 Eliano Trimark SFR 475.43 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11260 Eliano Trimark SFR 475.43 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11240 Eliano Trimark SFR 475.43 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11195 Eliano Trimark SFR 475.43 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11215 Eliano Trimark SFR 475.43 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11245 Eliano Trimark SFR 475.43 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11275 Eliano Trimark SFR 475.43 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11285 Eliano Trimark SFR 791.90 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11280 Eliano Trimark SFR 791.90 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11270 Eliano Trimark SFR 682.88 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11250 Eliano Trimark SFR 791.90 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11220 Eliano Trimark SFR 791.90 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11205 Eliano Trimark SFR 682.88 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11225 Eliano Trimark SFR 791.90 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11235 Eliano Trimark SFR 682.88 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11255 Eliano Trimark SFR 791.90 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
11265 Eliano Trimark SFR 682.88 TM 2525-2-RECORDED
16,563.13
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 2a
Mixed Use-Res.
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Portion 2,716.50 6,315.27 TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
Mixed Use-Retail
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Portion 849.37 12,260.19 TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Retail/Commercial 2,744.40 50,728.09 TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Duplex Stock 706.65 3,398.07 TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Triplex Stock 1,934.98 5,025.55 TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Triplex 1,748.49 - TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Triplex 1,748.49 TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Triplex 1,748.49 TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Triplex 1,748.49 TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Triplex 1,748.49 TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Triplex 1,748.49 TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Triplex 1,748.49 TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Triplex 1,748.49 TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Triplex 1,748.49 TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Duplex 1,175.46 TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Duplex 1,175.46 TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Duplex 1,175.46 TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Duplex 1,175.46 TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Duplex 1,175.46 TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Duplex 1,175.46 TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Duplex 1,175.46 TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Duplex 1,175.46 TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Duplex 1,175.46 TTM-2003-0044 EXP 10/12/2014
35,267.45 77,727.17
11717 Salvia Lane Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,418.99
9152 Sheerin Court Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,242.87
9150 Sheerin Court Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,641.11
9151 Sheerin Court Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,617.68
9153 Sheerin Court Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,242.87
9155 Sheerin Court Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,334.71
11711 Salvia Lane Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,418.99
9156 Trigo Court Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,242.87
9154 Trigo Court Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,618.18
9155 Trigo Court Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,641.11
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 2a
9157 Trigo Court Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,242.87
9159 Trigo Court Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,334.71
11708 Salvia Lane Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,418.99
9161 Sulivan Court Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,242.87
9163 Sullivan Court Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,618.18
9162 Sullivan Court Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,641.11
9160 Sulivan Court Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,242.87
11710 Salvia Lane Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,334.71
11714 Salvia Lane Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,334.71
9165 Casero Court Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,242.87
9164 Casero Court Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,618.18
9166 Casero Court Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,641.11
9164 Casero Court Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,242.87
11716 Salvia Lane Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 11,418.99
11805-
11811 Cumbre Court Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 42,567.07
116019-
11625 Cardelina Lane Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 42,539.06
9178-9172 Pato Lane Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 42,539.37
11317-
11311 Cuervo Way Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 42,539.37
11610-
11616 Cardelina Lane Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 42,539.37
11611-
11617 Cardelina Lane Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 42,539.37
11618-
11626 Cardelina Lane Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 52,415.38
9162-9157 Pato Lane Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 52,415.38
9152-9160 Pato Lane Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 52,415.38
9151-9159 Pato Lane Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 52,415.38
11319-
11327 Cuervo Way Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 52,415.38
9171-9179 Pato Lane Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 52,415.38
11301-
11309 Cuervo Way Corona Dove Creek paid plan check 52,415.38
- 896,165.69
4705-4711 ECR JRW Group/Acacia Community Rm 1,839.80
4705-4711 ECR JRW Group/Acacia Residential 3,181.78
4705-4711 ECR JRW Group/Acacia Retail 1,596.11
4705-4711 ECR JRW Group/Acacia Residential 3,070.65
4705-4711 ECR JRW Group/Acacia Residential 2,677.46
4705-4711 ECR JRW Group/Acacia Residential 16,928.01
need eng est to
4705-4711 ECR JRW Group/Acacia Improvements 1,526.34 calc fees
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 2a
6580-6590 Serra Caliber Homes Duplex 1,255.23 22,235.42 MAP EXPIRED-NO ENTITLEMENTS
6560-6570 Serra Caliber Homes Duplex 1,330.38 18,785.46 MAP EXPIRED-NO ENTITLEMENTS
6540-6550 Serra Caliber Homes Duplex 1,342.98 22,128.05 MAP EXPIRED-NO ENTITLEMENTS
6545-6555 Serra Caliber Homes Duplex 1,342.98 22,128.05 MAP EXPIRED-NO ENTITLEMENTS
6565-6575 Serra Caliber Homes Duplex 1,342.98 18,816.05 MAP EXPIRED-NO ENTITLEMENTS
6585-6595 Serra Caliber Homes Duplex 1,259.91 18,617.67 MAP EXPIRED-NO ENTITLEMENTS
7,874.46 122,710.70
6905 ECR Colony Square Bldg B/C Res 11,972.26 -
6905 ECR Colony Square Bldg B/C Com 3,253.80
6905 ECR Colony Square Bldg D Res 13,942.75
6905 ECR Colony Square Bldg D Com 1,241.26 -
30,410.07
13006 Atascadro Eagle Creek SFR conversion 1,825.30 28,457.14 TTM
13000 Atascadero Atascadero Homeowners LLC 2,532.40 TTM
Commerical Bldg undetermined at
0 West Front West Front Properties A 1,565.45 this time
Commerical Bldg undetermined at
0 West Front West Front Properties B 2,561.51 this time
4,126.96
TTM-2006-0088/FMP-2007-0154 EX
8235 San Andreas GDBI LLC SFR,UNIT A 1,338.93 27,534.65 8/8/2014
TTM-2006-0088/FMP-2007-0154 EX
8255 San Andreas GDBI LLC SFR UNIT B 1,287.88 26,940.35 8/8/2014
TTM-2006-0088/FMP-2007-0154 EX
8215 San Andreas GDBI LLC SFR UNIT C 1,393.80 27,144.06 8/8/2014
TTM-2006-0088/FMP-2007-0154 EX
8205 San Andreas GDBI LLC SFR UNIT D 1,099.72 26,995.28 8/8/2014
TTM-2006-0088/FMP-2007-0154 EX
8255 San Andreas GDBI LLC Carport 153.00 250.25 8/8/2014
TTM-2006-0088/FMP-2007-0154 EX
0 San Andreas GDBI LLC Off-Sites 1,105.63 2,227.75 8/8/2014
undetermined at TTM-2006-0088/FMP-2007-0154 EX
0 San Andreas GDBI LLC Off-Sites 322.83 this time 8/8/2014
6,701.79 111,092.34
10700 Aliso MLW Holdings SFR UNIT 1 1,151.73 28,819.53 NO ENTITLEMENTS
10704 Aliso MLW Holdings SFR UNIT2 1,127.98 28,515.77 NO ENTITLEMENTS
10708 Aliso MLW Holdings SFR UNIT 3 1,127.98 28,515.78 NO ENTITLEMENTS
10709 Aliso MLW Holdines SFR UNIT4 1,127.98 28,515.77 NO ENTITLEMENTS
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 2a
10705 Aliso MLW Holdings SFR UNIT 5 1,098.77 28,478.86 NO ENTITLEMENTS
10703 Aliso MLW Holdings SFR UNIT 6 1,226.39 - NO ENTITLEMENTS
Public
0 Avenida Maria MLW Holdings Improvements 628.50 NO ENTITLEMENTS
7,489.33 142,845.71
Public undetermined at
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Improvements 461.50 this time
Public undetermined at
0 Navajoa MLW Holding Improvement 658.50 this time FMP-2008-0167 EXP 2/26/2015
Public undetermined at
7845 Navajoa Zachary&Michelle Millsner Improvements 682.00 this time TTM-2007-0090 EXP 6/17/2015
undetermined at
0 Vista Bonita Charnley Land Development Improrvements 471.50 this time TTM 2003-0029 EXP 11/21/2013
Public
5310 Carrizo Road Fred Machado Improvement 7,481.50 14,879.51 TM#2625 RECORDED
San Rafael
0 Road Kelly Gearhart Improvements 7,255.71 17,071.59 NO ENTITLEMENTS
5610 Maravilla Paritosh Patel SFR 1,298.89 17,173.64 TTM 2005-0081 EXP 6/12/15
5600 Maravilla Paritosh Patel SFR 1,315.27 17,173.64 TTM 2005-0081 EXP 6/12/16
5630 Maravilla Paritosh Patel SFR 1,315.27 17,134.20 TTM 2005-0081 EXP 6/12/17
5620 Maravilla Paritosh Patel SFR 1,298.89 17,134.23 TTM 2005-0081 EXP 6/12/18
5650 Maravilla Paritosh Patel SFR 1,298.89 17,199.82 TTM 2005-0081 EXP 6/12/19
5640 Maravilla Paritosh Patel SFR 1,326.19 17,199.82 TTM 2005-0081 EXP 6/12/20
5605 Maravilla Paritosh Patel SFR 1,315.27 17,173.64 TTM 2005-0081 EXP 6/12/21
5615 Maravilla Paritosh Patel SFR 1,298.89 17,134.20 TTM 2005-0081 EXP 6/12/22
5635 Maravilla Paritosh Patel SFR 1,287.97 17,108.03 TTM 2005-0081 EXP 6/12/23
5625 Maravilla Paritosh Patel SFR 1,298.89 17,134.20 TTM 2005-0081 EXP 6/12/24
5645 Maravilla Paritosh Patel SFR 1,298.89 17,134.23 TTM 2005-0081 EXP 6/12/25
5655 Maravilla Paritosh Patel SFR 1,298.89 17,134.23 TTM 2005-0081 EXP 6/12/26
5625 Maravilla Paritosh Patel SFR 631.00 694.00 TTM 2005-0081 EXP 6/12/27
16,283.20 206,527.88
Public undetermined at
0 Principal Hamish Marshall Improvements 461.50 this time
0 Rosario Greg Ravatt SFR LOT 1 paid plan check 13,894.60
0 Rosario Greg Ravatt SFR LOT 2 paid plan check 13,894.60
0 Rosario Greg Ravatt SFR LOT3 paid plan check 13,894.60
0 Rosario Greg Ravatt SFR LOT 4 paid plan check 13,894.60
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 2a
this time
5105 Chauplin Don Messer SFR paid plan check 25,637.48 NO MAP
5305 Chauplin Don Messer SFR paid plan check 19642.47 NO MAP
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 2b
Attachment 2b: Dormant Spreadsheet, Permits to Cancel
Last
Address Street Owner Description Activity Cancel Fees Issue Fees Map Status
TTM-2005-0074 EXP
5437 Olmeda Roger Emmons SFR 4/11/2007 1,491.87 11/21/2013
TTM-2005-0074 EXP
5435 Olmeda Roger Emmons SFR 4/11/2007 1,664.07 11/21/2013
TTM-2005-0074 EXP
5439 Olmeda Roger Emmons SFR 4/11/2007 1,584.87 11/21/2013
4,740.81
7065 Navajoa William Moses SFR 8/19/2005 528.26 1,966.95 NO MAP
7065 Navajoa William Moses SFR 8/19/2005 380.26 1,756.45 NO MAP
7065 Navajoa William Moses SFR 8/19/2005 380.26 1,756.45 NO MAP
1,288.78 5,479.85
5092 Palma Roger Grant SFR 7/17/2007 1,884.26 18,228.67 NO MAP
5094 Palma Roger Grant SFR 7/17/2007 1,694.26 17,848.65 NO MAP
5096 Palma Roger Grant SFR 7/17/2007 1,694.26 18,245.65 NO MAP
5,272.78 54,322.97
Santa
0 Ysabel Royce Construction SFR 8/29/2007 2,202.17 13,050.37 NO MAP
Santa
0 Ysabel Royce Construction SFR 8/29/2007 2,057.72 13,280.57 NO MAP
Santa
0 Ysabel Royce Construction SFR 8/29/2007 1,920.88 12,769.06 NO MAP
6,180.77 39,100.00
10790 Vista Royce Construction 2nd Unit 12/7/2007 1,618.86 20,824.23 NO MAP
Central Coast Dev
9700 Las Lomas Inc SFR 1/4/2005 732.43 1,870.47 NO MAP
Central Coast Dev
9700 Las Lomas Inc 3-PLEX 1/18/2005 1,547.51 15,248.78 NO MAP
2,279.94
8105-
8107 Amapoa Timothy Karp SFR 4/1/2008 2,658.36 24,582.67 NO MAP
8109-
8111 Amapoa Timothy Karp SFR 4/1/2008 2,793.56 24,227.84 NO MAP
5,451.92
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 2b
8310 Santa Ynez Knute Welsh SFR 9/4/2007 1,514.68 21,253.36 MAP EXP 3/2008
8300 Santa Ynez Knute Welsh SFR 8/29/2007 1,221.52 20,611.19 MAP EXP 3/2008
0 Santa Ynez Knute Welsh Improvements 9/20/2007 281.67 527.85 MAP EXP 3/2008
3,017.87
Santa Frank&Lonnie
10747 Lucia Rocha SFR 4/18/2008 1,718.96 20,903.06
EI Camino undetermined at
11505 Real Jon Lanford Assembly Hall 3/23/2003 1,273.71 this time
undetermined at
0 Navajoa Morro Glen SFR 12/19/2007 1,175.14 this time
undetermined at
0 Navajoa Morro Glen Duplex 12/19/2007 1,254.20 this time
2,429.34
undetermined at TTM 2007-0099 EXP
0 Amapoa Steve Severance SFR 1/7/2008 1221.80 this time 8/19/2014
undetermined at TTM 2007-0099 EXP
0 Amapoa Steve Severance SFR 1/7/2008 1483.86 this time 8/19/2014
undetermined at TTM 2007-0099 EXP
0 Amapoa Steve Severance SFR 1/7/2008 2259.27 this time 8/19/2014
4964.93
TPM-2006-0083 EXP
5485 Olemeda Rodney Madruga SFR 1/2/2007 1,459.94 4,385.31 6/5/2014
Old Morro Scott&Roxanne Mc
13750 Road Mann SFR 1/30/2008 2,259.08 17,235.31 NO ENTITLEMENTS
Atascadero undetermined at
0 Vista Homeowners LLC SFR 10/9/2007 1,072.81 this time WITHDRAWN BY APPLICANT
Atascadero undetermined at
0 Vista Homeowners LLC SFR 10/9/2007 1,072.81 this time WITHDRAWN BY APPLICANT
Atascadero undetermined at
0 Vista Homeowners LLC SFR 10/9/2007 1,072.81 this time WITHDRAWN BY APPLICANT
Atascadero undetermined at
0 Vista Homeowners LLC SFR 10/9/2007 1,072.81 this time WITHDRAWN BY APPLICANT
4,291.24
Traffic Atascadero undetermined at
5955 Way Homeowners LLC Commercial 11/28/2007 1,452.64 this time
Atascadero
8895 San Rafael Homeowners LLC SFR 3/31/2008 3,764.57 30,721.29
Atascadero
5650 Ardilla Homeowners LLC SFR 5/20/2008 1,427.32 24,139.38
Atascadero
8210 Coromar Homeowners LLC SFR 2/20/2008 1,389.10 23,872.92
Atascadero
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 2b
San Atascadero Public undetermined at
0 Andres Homeowners LLC Improvement 3/20/2008 658.50 this time
Atascadero Public undetermined at
0 East Mall Homeowners LLC Improvements 8/18/2008 798.50 this time
Atascadero
6525 Navarrette Homeowners LLC SFR 2/1/2008 1,666.87 22,940.86
Santa undetermined at
6855 Lucia Michael Messer SFR 7/10/2008 407.64 this time NO ENTITLEMENTS
Santa undetermined at
6855 Lucia Michael Messer SFR 7/10/2008 407.64 this time NO ENTITLEMENTS
Santa undetermined at
6855 Lucia Michael Messer SFR 7/10/2008 407.64 this time NO ENTITLEMENTS
1,222.92
EI Camino Morro Road Homes Commercial
5730 Real LLC Bldg 5/13/2008 2,596.18 39,308.57
EI CaminoPublic undetermined at
2600 Real Myrna Bennett Improvements 12/18/2007 764.20 this time
Ardilla Public undetermined at
3265 Road DLG Development Improvements 3/17/2008 461.50 this time
EI Camino undetermined at
940 Real Westar Assoc. Gas Station 3/17/2008 358.50 this time
N.EI
Camino Public undetermined at
0 Real Westar Assoc. Improvements 4/11/2008 628.50 this time
987.00
EI Camino Public undetermined at
0 Real Morro Road LLC Improvements 5/18/2008 652.00 this time
Gearhart
0 Linda Vista Development Improvements 10/1/2007 4,718.89 4,718.89 WITHDRAWN BY APPLICANT
4675 Navidad David Graves SFR 2/1/2007 1,794.58 -
3556 Maricopa David Graves SFR 8/14/2006 1,326.83 -
4595 Portola David Graves SFR 6/21/2006 1,121.87 14,151.74
4590 Portola David Graves SFR 6/21/2006 1,492.14 16,079.68
0 Ardilla DLG Development SFR 8/14/2006 1,362.15 -
7,097.57 30,231.42
6910 Navajoa Randy Young SFR 1/3/2007 1,340.12 14,053.41 NO MAP
6924 Navajoa Randy Young SFR 1/8/2007 1,327.26 14,993.28 NO MAP
6914 Navajoa Randy Young SFR 1/3/2007 1,327.26 24,743.28 NO MAP
ITEM NUMBER: B - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 2b
6920 Navajoa Randy Young SFR 1/3/2007 1,123.14 22,278.12 NO MAP
5,117.78 76,068.09
6200 Marchant Chris Austin SFR 8/13/2007 945.03 4,132.78 NO MAP
6220 Marchant Chris Austin SFR 8/13/2007 1099.03 15,248.78 NO MAP
2044.06
NO MAP/ -NEW
Las Lomas Patrick Kennedy SFR 1/4/2005 732.43 1,870.47 OWNERSHIP
NO MAP/- NEW
9700 Las Lomas Patrick Kennedy 3plex 1/18/2005 1,547.51 3,639.93 OWNERSHIP
2,279.94
Old Morro
135000 Rd Bradley Steveson SFR 3/5/2007 paid plan check 17,280.13 NO ENTITLEMENTS
San David/Patricia
10560 Marcos Rd Kutzmann SFR 7/14/2008 paid plan check 22,123.34 NO ENTITLEMENTS
Conversion to cant calc-no sgft
13500 Old Morro Bradley Steveson 2nd Unit 3/5/2007 provided NO ENTITLEMENTS
13705 Santa Ana Charles Bennett SFR 8/15/2007 1,800.34 NO ENTITLEMENTS
0 Valle Sean Knoph SFR 4/20/2007 1,733.08 19,331.40 NO ENTITLEMENTS
Traffic
3170 Way Robert Rucker SFR 10/12/2005 1,297.38 3,683.68 NO ENTITLEMENTS
Lomitas Tamara Molfino 2nd Unit 1 8/10/2006 1 241.00 1,114.79 NO ENTITLEMENTS
Morro undetermined at
8005 Road SLO County Driveway 7/28/2008 140.00 this time
EI Camino Public undetermined at
2600 Real Myrna Bennett Improvements 12/18/2007 764.20 this time
Traffic EMERG.BY-
5599 Way City of Atascadero PASS BASIN 7/30/2008 City Projcet FCity Project
undetermined at
6345 Marchant Tom Sandercock Duplex 11/16/2007 761.58 1 this time
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
197
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — Community Development Department
Project Design Approval
Atascadero Creek Pedestrian Bridge and "Centennial Plaza"
RECOMMENDATION:
Design Review Committee Recommends:
The City Council approve the schematic design of "Centennial Plaza" and Atascadero
Creek trail.
DISCUSSION:
The Design Review Committee (DRC) and Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed
the Centennial Plaza project on September 15, 2011 . The Committee and Commission
provided the following direction:
1 . Move the pathway closer to Atascadero Creek.
2. Relocate the sculpture outside of the plaza.
3. Provide a sign for the plaza.
4. Incorporate memorial bricks into the plaza.
5. Consider a time capsule in the plaza.
6. Incorporate additional historic features around the plaza.
7. Include Wayfinding signs.
8. Provide plenty of lighting and electrical hook-up capacity.
The project architect, Thom Jess of Arris Studio Architects incorporated these changes
into the project (refer to color attachment for a full set of plans).
The revised plans were reviewed by the DRC on November 10, 2011 . At the meeting,
tha AtacrnrlPrn Hictnrirral gnriatx/ rani iPctarl tha nath alinnmant ha rhnnnarl to nrnvirla
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
additional space for the Tent City event that is held during Colony Days. The DRC
asked staff to hold a follow-up meeting with the Historical Society to investigate
alternative alignments for the pathway. After reviewing the issue, staff and the
Historical Society have mutually agreed to move the Tent City event to the Sunken
Gardens. This location will provide more space and better visibility for the event. Staff
believes that any impacts to the grass can be mitigated with the cooperation of the
Historic Society.
The Historic Society also raise a concern about the pathway connect to the Colony
House entry walk. Since this area will need to be rebuilt once the parking lot is
reconstructed, staff is recommending that this leg of the trail be deferred to Phase 4
and built as part of the parking lot project.
The DRC is recommending Council approval of the schematic design of "Centennial
Plaza" and Atascadero Creek trail with the following additional change:
• All benches should have a "no sleep" center arm rail.
t Itm
13 KI
I I I I I
1 1
Idol I I I I I
1 I
® _ L
r -
- ...� .. .... ...... ..................... ...............
■
ROSE
G
GARDEN
- HISTORIC
SOCIETY
s
This section of path should be deferred to Phase 4
when the parking lot is reconstructed.
0 dpcmmnncpd nranifo nnfh will ho incfnllpd in fho
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
CITY OF ATASCADH
CENTERED AT TOP C
^ PLATA SIGN SPANNI
Centennial Plaza BETWEEN COLUMNS
Entry feature and � ARCHEDSMAPEREF
wayfinding sign SHAPE OFPEDESIRL
(2)4-SQUARE STEEL
EACH SIDE OF SIGN
WAYFINDING SIGN
MOUNTED ON POST
P
CONCRETE BASE W,
r RECESSED PANEL SO
Plaza includes °�` ELEMENTS USED ATI
CAMINO REAL GRID
memorial bricks and
time capsule location
lightingPLAZA ENTRANCE SIGNAGE
and additional li
g g• AT MA.L STREET
SUNKEN GARDEN
_ O �aP acA
East MallFP
__
r
1C IB lA 2 3 4 , 5 6 7 d 9 11 12 13 15 , 16
ID I I I I
tIDIWof
� ❑ 1E�_
25 X10TE CITY AREA
° ( L
ROSE p
GARDEN
AT CADEROCREEK
MY
1\
r soft trail next to creek - r-
bank.
New connections to EG Lewis sculpt
Trail relocated closer to Rose Garden. located at plaza
water with lookout feature. terminus
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
1
East Mall _ - NEW CROSSWALK TO
•' CORNER OF SUNKEN
VIEW ACCESS -
CENTERED ON �I NEW cuae Cur
------- --- ---.P.LA-ZA _,---------- =r--- -- --
1 S 16 LANDSCAPING AROUI
OF ENTRY SIGN STRUC
ACORN LIGHT FIXTURE WAYFINDING SIGNAGE
wlT+i rn i AMP "�--- BRICK WALKWAY OOv
i CENTER WITH DEDICA'
I FUNDRAISER BRICKS
OVERHEAD SIGN FRAMING --
ENTRANCE TO PLAZA
STEEL PARK BENCH
ALONG EDGES OF PL)
1
��.
TREE PLANTED IN CITY
STANDARD IRON TREE GRATE I J DECORATIVE CONCRI
ORIENTED-NORTH".(P
LOCATION OF TIME G
CONCRETE BANDING TO
DEFINE PAVING PATTERN
DECORATIVE I❑ ❑ EC
I CONCRETE PASTAMPED& VING
STREET LIGHT POLES I f -
- IN GROUND UP-LIGHTI
I TO HIGHLIGHT STATUE
TEXTURED CONCRETE
PAVING AROUND FUTURE I I ___ FUTURE LOCATION OF
E.G.LEWIS STATUE ' _ LEWIS MEMORIAL STAT
L� T
RAISED CURVED PLANTER WITH - CURVED CEDAR PERC
LOW STONE&CONCRETE _ TO FORM BACKGROU
WALLS TO MATCH HISTORICAL. _ TO STATUE AND TERMI
SOCIETY GARDEN WALLS __ TO LONG VIEW THRU I
_ - EXISTING LIGHT POLE
O TO BE REMOVED
To EI Camino Real
To Lewis Ave
CG r
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
Background: The 2005 Downtown Revitalization Plan (following page) envisioned an
Atascadero Creek pedestrian bridge and creekside trail that would connect Downtown
to Colony Square. With the completion of the Galaxy Theatre at Colony Square, the
pedestrian bridge has become the number one priority for the Redevelopment Agency.
Staff is currently working on the environmental review and engineering for the
pedestrian bridge, which is scheduled to be installed next summer, 2012.
One of the primary purposes of the pedestrian bridge is to connect the Sunken Gardens
to Colony Square. This will improve pedestrian circulation throughout the Downtown,
which will benefit businesses and make more public parking available for Colony
Square. In order to make this connection to the Sunken Gardens and East Mall, the
City has acquired a lot along East Mall. The 2,500 square foot lot will allow for a
straight line pedestrian connection between East Mall and Colony Square via the
pedestrian bridge.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
Downtown Revitalization Plan Vision
C.1L13 V)1 V l:\
\ 1
\ 'iCSFwy wkc( .
��Yg7lenenklim fhb \� .
114:nM`�
4l-4 Gti A Y Aa s A \
-A'
eta
�ftcu�L1n.lnra'r M,rr':-F. 4•I+ ��_. � •r/� 1 � <;...c.,.s ..
IJe_I r�ul GxMf�l�- �tt1.hc•'+ � � I ' \ 'rss.w rt s Ncr-
��b�at.prY, <r�+a►r<r.� nai Fri[vE u t. � � K�z�•. l`
-
.,r+K+Or+`(" � fL"�Krs✓_:V.y`_ 1 ,.. ., ,j�_ ..-__ 1 I � _
2005 Downtown
twrF,(_c.rr+.,G h
Revitalization Pla
iiiaVraL W�o..34r J1
... Y---.++1�'S11�LVwff0.1J •�:U@.G�t-^:." ^� }1rFi'�wnJ_._.
y,rLy..14S tl OE�l.Je �� fid' f" p r
- a�
V1 7 d "_ten
it U • ;� r
1
East Mall Pedestrian
• /� w connection /
opportunity site
AIM
r y Pedestrian Bridge
. i
Creekside Trail
connection from EI
P Camino Real to Lew
x �` Avenue
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
- � � ,/
e c
enuc
ca
f Parki
ng
��►► P tBank
Amer
♦ �_ City O@i,
link
ri u e Administration `pF�`nart wn
Building
.... yOk. ,
oll
fir¢ H
♦ 1� p.d+
OPS
un
GardennkeY 3y - -
r s �' U r
Pte'
a O Eaisdng j Q 16�.tt�t
I
� Motel
I' -kill,
Pedestrian bridge alignment was �*
intended to follow an open view
corridor between Historic City Hall T %,e De� r U
J
kand the theater rotunda. Mlk
ti Qa 1 /`tto«L:n. _ �fiil-titttt 1
Olsen-Parcelli
5901 f-ast-Mall-If
P`
`�
c ` G
d�oo'R o
n
Axial-view-corridor- `
O betweenCity-Hall-and- ;
Galaxy Theatrell
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
Analysis: In order to fully realize the potential of the pedestrian bridge project, staff has
prepared a conceptual Master Plan of the Downtown Atascadero Creek block. The
plan envisions a number of possible improvements that would enhance pedestrian
circulation and access to the creek as well as creating a new public gathering place
tentatively called "Centennial Plaza." The project would provide the following features
and public benefits:
• Pedestrian connection to Colony Square
• Improved Downtown parking
• Downtown restroom for Sunken Garden / Transit Center
• Creekside trail
• Creek restoration and improved public access with interpretive signage
• Improved visibility and police monitoring of Creek
• ADA parking for City Hall and Colony House
• Relocation of Colony houses from Walmart project area (EIR mitigation requirement)
• Public enhancement project for Atascadero's Centennial celebration in 2013.
• Enhanced location for Tent City / Colony Days
• Public Art
OJ
lAd
., .r..r,sn1uc � �` ��� r•e..,c vcr..,r. .n ,
1
�.
Cl
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 11/22/11
FISCAL IMPACT:
The bridge, plaza, creek trail and parking lot area rehabilitation project has an approved
total budget cap of $3,068,560. The cost estimate of the trail and plaza will be provided
with the 60% completion submittal from the project engineer in December. Staff will
work closely with engineering team to value engineer the project to ensure the entire
project remains within the approved budget parameters.
ALTERNATIVES:
1 . The Council can make minor modifications to the project design elements.
2. If the Council is not satisfied with the overall concept, the item should be referred
back to the DRC for reconsideration.
ATTACHMENTS:
1 . "Centennial Plaza" schematic architectural plans.
Attachmei
=amid 16.
.41
/ A*- •. I
A A
Atascadero Pcdcstrian A taaco crc
v P e d e s c r I
• Bridge P1 +
Bridge Plaza
Co
i
• CevN fMN
Attachmei
� s
East moil --- -—
,.:
IC ri U
O III
li
I.
U 0 ,_L _
15'x tQ? .V ARFA 1
rl �
v. r
r — "
®SCOW LbPn rMkte»In LgZ rww' \ r s c a d
t r
4 M'ww3'wSGWA U ti r i d g e P
Ij
Pedestrlan Bridge Plaza & Creek Walk Overall Plan
rc;1Mfi►,n M19,c,r1
Ovcr it:'Fin
Attachmei
1 ti
t -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -
T
0
.9
E
7T
A; A'
F~ovol cp tom AmD-wew-
MAN$1011M ur*"341 W."
AMA AMWC(t"9lICW.S
f`PftCCW--t L—J�-'I
10 CMA'- Ax,hl.
Aft. WAJ KWAV AWAM(^WAIM Cl
qsA--*-0.ft M11- .rnAt rs a c a d 4
P e d le o t r I
H ridge PI
...a•. J A e
PRO.
Pedestrian Creek Walk Southern Portion
4N4 I Pe Jcstd^Oc-rk W-il
T7 E
Attachmei
� � KLts1tNM MbG:
I I. .sNA ur(xKa 4`RT
.ADK fIMC"Al . _ _� ® ®' -- r..t MnwuAfo•i
1VEAigMMR lifts AVC
♦JV W.7P C7ttA:t Klfi/. �
'h.Mffrl lWVn Ai•A AI'ii.'- __
14cc�JKADIV=
1.-41 Cf1Y Att&
�NfX C~tiC.�'�MA1.Ma• , 1 — 1 `
s1:VMJxn•ri_, - -
ttr.,
$Ay:c
1n/ .ui uec'1. Y�
11VIwAi1•^AW.Y.M ♦-
( I ufrf
- _it. !..'c „-j..L•':f<�... `.gyp � _
Ir Ate orcaAlrsm
wAttA+A•wJ1M^pOloom
®
Ac-w-4lowlawnl.v.r r—wt !`'AICti E�.i�JrDf A t :t A c a
i' c d c 6 t t
4 wwvTcw�a:MG' Ii ridge P
Pedestrian Creek Walk - Northern Portion r
�...:. Vj
cicGc�k,,,,, .•. ,yt-c- n
Attachmei
-- �ynvA•AK•tw,7 007 —._—.�._----
� aucalo.f ru a a�
} East mall PZW CW.-4MAtCn
,t wAlA,Yw r,INYi Cf1h.-a�s 1•rwaE►+OAACf).
cer-t2amial !laza
r rwty rmcsrlw IrtCt
vl f it+.::::-•'` -�raw cuts C.r
y
it r/Daae[t'[a[•Oi7T :.FVi=?='i:.f.
Qu�•Ipalb[ww _—�— ---- --
,t t
y wxwrCT.BRt tA •►.G A1-� w.C >mICATtl Mb4
VY.G.,r�r,lw.c-.
LO•A:a�l A4M M�
M-.eS15 rAAL>NM h
C4M�J rot eT7 M
C ••wA•fY..w\
1
av7lwl�oVm*C#.*,VIM In
t
� -- S[;et MAIK RN0�
ALCWP MAS Cr RAM
IMFFt AWIOry Clle
SrA►CJA7 M.Iw tet!wAn J 1 CLC'* ivt C�[ %GuMN
gafuo-#_v%r IpcxpI
�L1CA'17.r^•r Ase cAnu ry
erneaett aA1 eNb+a I CO
WIC!/A41)'Ki•AI}eOl
:D COLCIM
1
1
ter, t
l fO Ml'MICK SIAM
2tlJel0 Cf'NOR•k 1 r
rA�IK ARo�rouitVM 1r� It114 tOCi\Mr[:%EC,
WWO"StArti
rAtn c.r n n► e wcut+M COCA&SWINA
low t7:ss L
C%0,4 -- IA 10 r.+ew aABcc.�:^Iw
MAUS 101AA1Ck np,rICA:� v TQ ftA1Ut APO Tlripta
fOgM C-A4 wAl.f to t?A H'w•1•e0 p"
vm%u J•sA omt
O Ir atw.rfTO
TO N Con eo R.,
I
•U_�"1•'-1T �4•Iw01V�1hMAG �}f-.
® AcO .IOn••f,_`.et wIMSJ:AN'
o! I' .• .1 � 1 r
►f�tth
- Pedestrian Bridge Plaza Plan
T_r 'G fc It chl'Ir Brl��<
p �
Attachmei
4 wAYnMhG SIGNAGE
4#'Ar4M00.W, ----- - p
CIfY C}
AIASCA?:k,
eUu�lw
Nl MCS CriilN�t�Y.�+
OALOJI nkAV4h 414)3-(-
COIOW SO.An crote
y:)A
tFrM•;:U�XI CE(OYK�D 2�
UAVIC N4.R�A'N SSD
OA1At•r/fA1t13
t a a C: a C
l
P e d c s t r I
Bridge Plat
-• Pedestrian Bridge - Colony Square Connection --
�.+._
Plaza Entry
-:, Gateway
Y, r
J
w� �
i
Z
�{1�r � �► sur � i
'i
/ too
00
000
jo
' �`` ♦ ♦ Q
Bridge P,
31
1 �
l�
Attachmei
•Y `'� .1 1 11�'1 1 C C' � � 1 C
off!
ilk
eu
P e d
Bridge P1
r �� � :o� rCtU•
i
w..nen i,,..k Ing Towards
3T.a:..: a:r�.1�i,••otkMf WIAn�
mow``.
Attachmei
-.:f.:-.'1.rf - 1 � (fit ��y�.fA•JS_o7ero�•ert
��-"1�• w:f"�-Jv' }L C.• Y Frowowa F-3a!Qar&pao
vy
L�
A ta s c A d
P e d e s t r i
Bridge PI
C o.
.f
. Socflon Along
Creek
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
F 7,F15 �gi�pi�r fn tit 4
_em
—, � DATE: 11/22/11
i979
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report — Community Development Department
2010 Census
Summary Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Council receive and file the attached 2010 Census Report. No action is required.
DISCUSSION:
Background: The U.S. Census is a 10-year population count with results used to
allocate congressional seats, electoral votes and funding for federal government
programs. The Census is mandated by the U.S. Constitution. In addition to a population
count, the Census provides statistical data that gives a snapshot of our nation on April
1 , 2010.
For the 2010 U.S. Census, the Federal Government utilized what was known as the
"short" form, which consisted of 10 questions. Those questions included:
• the type of living arrangement of the person(s);
• the number of people they were living with;
• the type of housing they lived in and whether it was owner- or renter-occupied;
• telephone number;
• names of all persons in a household and their relationship to the head of
household
• the respondent's sex
• the respondent's age and date of birth;
• whether the respondent was of Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin;
• the respondent's race;
• and whether or not the respondent sometimes lives or stays somewhere else.
The U.S. Census Bureau released data for the State of California and its cities in April
of 2011 . This is not an estimate, but an actual count on April 1 , 2010. In addition, the
Census Bureau will begin releasing statistical estimated data known as the American
Community Survey in October of 2011 . These data include detailed information such as
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 11/22/11
income ranges, job sector data, vehicle miles traveled, and other information that was
not a part of Census 2010 "short form."
Analysis: The official population for the City of Atascadero on April 1 , 2010 was 28,310
persons. The City grew in population by 7.1% compared to Census 2000, adding 1 ,899
new residents to the City in that 10-year span. The City is now the third largest city in
San Luis Obispo County, surpassed by Paso Robles since the last Census. The City
had the third largest population gain in the County in terms of percentage in that 10-year
span, behind Paso Robles and Arroyo Grande respectively. The City is now the 243rd
most populous City in the State, a drop from 231St most populist city in the State in
2000.
San Luis Obispo County Population Comparison
N 140
H 120
3
0
H 100
80
60 ElCensus 2
❑Census 2
40 --
20 Fri
0
I-1-1 � I I EE Fo .
aae
, °`�` t� Q
°``
.41* 0a° S
G° ce e�
° 9yr ° 0
IPO A0
° Ot
OPt
vy
yar ya
Population Make-Up
The City's total population of 28,310 includes 1 ,100 institutionalized patients at the
Atascadero State Hospital, or 3.9% of the total population. Of the City's total population,
50.8% is male and 49.2% is female. The City's median age is approximately 41 years.
The median age of the City's residents increased when compared to Census 2000 by
2.8 years. The 2010 Census revealed that 21 .4% of the City's population is under the
age of 18 while 78.6% is over the age of 18. The City's population over the age of 62
has grown since the last Census, increasing from 13.5% to 18.9% of the total
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 11/22/11
2010 Atascadero Population by Age
62 and Over
17%
❑ Under 16
El 18 to 62
❑62 and Over
Under 16
18 to 62 19
64
The City's largest population group identified in the 2010 Census is White alone, which
comprised of 76.8% of the population. Hispanic/Latinos make up the largest minority
group, at 15.6% of the City's total population. This represents a 5% increase in the
Hispanic/Latino population when compared to Census 2000. Of the remaining minority
populations, 2.3% of the population identified themselves of Asian descent; 1 .9% of the
population identified themselves as African American; and 2.4% of the population
identified themselves as belonging to more than one race. Additionally, the City has
smaller percentages of residents that identified themselves as native Hawaiian and
other Pacific Islander, or some other race.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 11/22/11
2010 City of Atascadero Population Make-Up
Hispanic/Latino
16%
African American
2%
Asian
2%
Other Race
0%
❑White Alone
Two or More Races
2% ❑Hispanic/Latino
❑African American
❑Asian
■Other Race
❑Two or More
Races
White Alone
78%
Housing Statistics
As expected, the City had a significant increase in the number of total housing units
between 2000 and 2010. There were a total of 11 ,505 residential units throughout the
City on April 1 , 2010. This represents a 16.8% increase in units compared to 2000 when
9,848 units were counted. A total of 1 ,657 units were constructed during this time
period. The City saw the second largest number of housing units produced in the
County; only Paso Robles saw a larger increase. The average household size is 2.51
persons per unit. This represents a decrease compared to Census 2000 where the
average household size was 2.61 persons per unit.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 11/22/11
Table 1
San Luis Obispo County Housing Units Comparison
City 2000 Total 2010 Total Percentage
Housing Housing Change
Units Units
Paso Robles 8,791 11,426 30.0%
Atascadero 9.848 11,505 16.8%
Unincorporated 40,451 48,550 16.6%
County
Arroyo Grande 6,750 7,628 13%
San Luis Obispo 19,306 20,553 6.5%
Morro Bay 6,251 6,320 1.1%
Pismo Beach 5,496 5,585 1.6%
10,737 units were considered "occupied" on April 1 , 2010. Of these units, 59.3% were
owner-occupied units, while 34% were considered renter-occupied units. As a
percentage breakdown, these percentages remained virtually the same when compared
to the 2000 Census.
Of the total units, 768 were considered "vacant" or not occupied at the time of the
Census. This represents 6.7% of the total housing units. Compared to 2000, the
vacancy rate has more than doubled. The current economic climate is likely the primary
factor in this rate doubling.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 11/22/11
Total Percentage of Housing Units 2010-Atascadero
Owner Occupied
59%
❑Owner Occupied
❑Renter Occupied
❑Vacant
Renter Occupied
34%
Vacant
7%
Family households, those households with at least one member of the household
related by birth, marriage, or adoption, make up 69% of the total occupied units, while
non-family households make up only 31% of the total occupied units.
General Plan Assumptions
The General Plan provides City staff with a population projection necessary to formulate
the assumptions for future growth in the community. The City's General Plan assumed
an annual growth rate average of 1 .25% through the year 2020. The General Plan
estimated that the City's Population would be approximately 29,904 persons. The actual
annual growth rate between that 10-year span was 0.71%, about 40% slower than
expected.
Table 2 — General Plan Assumption
Atascadero Growth Rate 2010 Population
General Plan 1.25% 29,904 persons
(Projection)
2010 Census 0.71% 28,310 persons
(Actual)
niff-ranrra _n r;d0/ 1 -1 r;qd narcnnc
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 11/22/11
The General Plan contains a projected potential development table. These numbers
help craft future development of commercial, residential units and infrastructure. As of
Census 2010, the City had 11 ,505 residential units. The General Plan projected that the
City would have 13,701 units by 2020. Based on this projection, the City has a
development potential of over 2,200± residential units for the remainder of the General
Plan (2025).
Conclusion: The City has increased in population over the last 10 years. Although the
City has increased the number of residents, Census 2010 captured a large number of
vacant units within the City, more than likely due to the recent recession and foreclosure
crisis that the nation has faced.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENT:
1 . Census 2010 Short Form Results
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 1
Attachment 1: Census 2010 Short Form Results
U.S. Census Bureau
AN1ERIC
Fact Fi nder
DP-1 Profile of General Population and Housing Characteristics:2010
2010 Demographic Profile Data
NOTE:For more information on eonfiderriality protection,nonsamplirg error,and defnd�ors,see http:blvww census.gov'prodcer2010,'profletd.pef.
GEO:Atascadera city,California
Subject Number Percent
SEX AND AGE
Total population 28,310 1C4.0
Jrder f years 1,688 59
5 to 9 years 1,631 5.8
C to 14 ears 1,67' 59
15 to 19 years 1,722 6.1
20 to 24 years 1,656 58
25 to 29 years 2,026 7.2
30 to 34 year. 1.779 .33
35 to 39 years 1,649 5.8
40 tc-4,-.ears 1,790 6.3
45 to 49 years 2,208 7.8
513 to 54 years 2,474 8.7
55 to 59 years 2,466 8.7
6C tc E4 years 1.894 6.7
65 to E9 years 1,198 4.2
7C tc 74 years 826 29
75 to 79 years 625 2.2
SC t-^84 years 507 1 8
85 years and over 530 1.9
Mad ar aye(yeas} 41.0 (X;
16 years and over 22,967 81 1
'e year_.ane over 22,242 796
21 years and over 21,316 75.3
62 years anc over 4,722 167
65 years and over 3.686 13.0
Me a populaticr 14,379 50.8
Under 5 years 843 3.0
5 to 9 years 82' 29
10 to 14 years 826 2.9
15 to 19 year. 920 3.2
20 to 24 year 885 3.1
25 to 29 years 1,052 3.7
30 to 34 years 988 3.4
35 tc 29 years 883 3.1
40 to 44 years 959 3.4
45 tc 49 years 1.'4' 4 C
50 to 54 years 1,216 4.3
55 tc E9 years 1,224 43
60 to E4 years 988 3.5
65 tc E9 years 582 2.1
70 to 74 years 391 1.4
75 tc 79 years 278 1.0
8C tc 84 years 224 0.8
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 1
Subject Number Fwasid
Pled ar aye(yea-s. 4G.0 (X)
16 year_-anc ove- 11,697 41 3
18 years anc over 11,311 40.0
21 years anc ove- 10,791 38.1
62 years anc over 2,195 7.8
65 year=anc ove- 1,653 5.8
Female pcpL.laaor 13,931 49.2
Under 5 yea-. 825 2.9
5 to 9 years 810 2.9
10 to 14 years 845 3 C
15 to 19 years 802 2.8
20 to 24 years 77' 2.7
25 to 29 years 974 3.4
30 tc 34 years 81' 2.9
35 to 39 years 766 2.7
40 tc 44 years 83' 2.9
45 to 49 years 1,087 3.8
50 to 54 years 1,258 4.4
55 to 59 years 1,242 4.4
60 to 64 years 896 3.2
65 to 69 years 616 22
70 to 74 years 435 1.5
75 to 79 years 347 1.2
8C tc 84 years 283 1.0
85 years and over 352 1.2
M-ad ar age';ea 3 42.2 (X)
16 years and over 11,270 39.8
18 years anc over 1C.931, 38.6
21 years anc over 10,525 372
62 year anc over 2,527 8.9
65 years and over 2,033 7.2
RACE
Total population 28,310 100.0
One Race 27,284 96.4
White 24,457 86.4
Black or African American 585 2.1
American Indian and Alaska Native 295 1.0
Asian 685 2.4
Asian Indian 58 02
Chinese 94 0.3
Filipino 264 0.9
Japanese 76 0.3
Korean 6' 02
Vietnarese 3' 0.1
Other As ar[1] 101 0.4
Native I-av:aiiar anc Other Pacific Islander 57 0.2
Native Hawaiian 17 0.1
Guaman ar or Ct•amoro 5 0.0
Samoan 20 0.1
Other Pacific Islander[2] 15 0.1
Some Other Race 1.205 4.3
Two or Mare Races 1,026 3.6
White.American Indian and Alaska Native[3] 3319 1.1
'Atite.Asiar[3] 228 0.8
White;Black or African American[3] 24 0.4
'A'hite.Some Other Race[3] g0.6
Race alone or in combination wi-h ore cr^ncre V.t•ar
races:]41
1Nhi-e 2:.403 897
Black or African Amencan 774 2.7
American Indian and Alaska Na-rae 704 2 5
2 of 4 C,9119-2C1'
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 1
Subject Number Percent
Asian 997 3.5
Native Hawa ia-3-o Ona,Pacific 1=arcer .1= D A
Some Other Race 1,447 5.1
HISPAN C OR LATINC
Total population 28,310 100.0
Hispanic or Lat no;o`any rata) 4,429 15.6
Main 3.678 13.0
Puerto Rican 99 03
Cuban 24 0.1
CZter H spanic or Latiro 15'. B28 2.2
Not Hispanic or Latino 23,881 84.4
-11SFAN C OR LATINO AND RACE
Taal population 28,310 100.0
-I spanic or Lat no 4,429 156
YJhite alone 2.715 9.6
B ack or African Ame-ican a ora 34 0.1
Arrerar Indiar anc Aaska Native alone 116 0.4
As ar alone e3 D.2
Native I-av:aiiar anc Ottar Dac,fc slancer alone 6 0.0
Some 0.1-ar Raca a one 1,'72 41
Two or More Races 343 1.2
Not H ispan c or L.atiro 23,88' 844
1,i alone 21,742 76.8
B ack o-A`rican Ame-ica-a ora 55' 1 9
A'rercar Indiar and Aaska Native alone 179 0.6
As air alone 642 2.3
Native Hai anc Otter macf.:; slancer alone 51 0.2
Some 0c1-er Ra--e a:;-e 33 3.1
Two or More Races 683 2.4
R=LAT CNSI-I'
Total pcpLlaaor 28,310 100 0
n tcJSe c ds 26,986 553
Househcder 10,737 37 9
Soc•.ise[E] 5,69' 23 1
Ch Id 7,323 25.9
Owr cmild urder 18 years 5,398 19 1
Other relatives 1,390 4.9
Jnder 19 years 49C, 1 e
65 years and over 227 7.8
Ncnrelatives 1.855 66
Under 19 tear 142 05
65 ear anc o':e- 94 D 3
m
Unan-ac oalne• 773 2.7
In croup qLarers 1,324 47
Institutionalized populaton 1.100 3.9
Male 1,030 3.6
Female 70 0.2
Ncnirsttuticrial¢ed popLlatior 224 08
Male 145 0.5
Female 79 0.3
HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE
Taal nouseholds 10,737 100.0
Family households(families)[7] 7,404 69.0
Y.rith own children uncer'9 year 3,09' 288
Husband-wife family 5.681 529
With ae•n chi ldrer under 18 yeas 2,13' 199
Male householder,no wife present 538 5.0
With own chi Idrer urder 18 yeas 286 2.7
Female householder,no husband present 1,185 11.0
With own chi ldrer under 18 yeas 674 63
3 o14 09+19/201'
ITEM NUMBER: C - 2
DATE: 11/22/11
Att. 1
Subject Number Percent
Nonfamily households[7] 3,333 31.0
Hcuseno der living alone 2,497 23.3
Male 1,071 10.0
65 years and over 240 2.2
Female 1,426 13.3
65 years and over 639 6.0
Households with individuals under 18 years 3,428 31.9
Households with individuals 65 years and over 2,609 24.3
Average household size 2.51 (X)
Average family size[7] 2.94 (X)
HOUSING OCCUPANCY
Total housing units 11,505 100.0
Occupied housing units 10.737 93.3
Vacant housing units 788 6.7
For rent 244 2.1
Rutted,not occupied 18 0.2
For sale only 151 1.3
Sold,not occupied 21 0.2
For seasonal.recreational,or occasional use 139 12
All other vacants 195 1.7
Homeowner vacancy rate(percent)[8] 2.2 (X)
Rental vacancy rte(percent}:9] 5.8 (X)
HOUSING TENURE
Occupied housing units 10,737 100.0
Owner-occupied housing units 6.827 63.6
Population in avner-occupied housing units 17,470 (X)
Average household size of owner-occupied units 2.56 (X)
Renter-occupied housing units 3,910 36.4
Population in renter-occupied housing units 9.516 (X)
Average no:isehold size of rentor-ccojp ed arts 2.43 (X)
X Not appl:able.
[1]Other Asian alone,or two or more Asian categores.
[2]Other Pac f c Islander alone,or two or more Native Hawa tan and Other Pacific Isiarder categones.
[3]One of the four most commonly reported multip4-race combinations nationwide in Cersus 2000-
[4)In combination with one or more of the other races listed The sx numbers may add to more than the total poou`ation.and the sot percentages ma
add to more than 100 percent because individuals may report more than one race.
[5]This category is composed of people whose origins are from the Dominican Reouolic,Spain,and Spanish-speakirg Central or Scith Arne-ican
countries.It also includes general origin responses sucl-as'Latino"or"Hisparic.'
[6]'Spouse'represents spouse of the househoder.It does rot refect all spouses it a household.Responses of'same-sax spouse'were ectad
during processing to"unmarried partner."
[7]'Family households"consist of a householder and one or more other pecole elated to the hoi senolder by b rth,marriage,or adoption They do n;
include same-sex marred couples even if the marriage was pe•for-rec n a state ssuing marriage certificates for same-sex couples.Same-sex coupl
households are included in the family households category ff there,s a:least one add tonal person related to the householder ay birt"i or adoption.
Same-sex couple nouseholds with no relatives of the householder present are tabu ated in ronfamity households.'Nonfamily househc ds'cons st of
people livirg a ore and households which do not have any members related to the no.isenader.
[8]The homeowrer vacarcy rate is the proportion of the homeowner inventory that is vacant'for sale.'It is computed by divid ng the total number of
vacant units'for sale only'by the sum of owner-occupied units,vacant units that are"for sae only.'and vacant units that have been sold but not yet
occupied:and then multiplying by 100.
[9]The rental vacancy rate is the proportion of the rental inventory that is vacant'for rent.''t is computed by d viding the total number of vacant units
'for rent"by the sum of the renter-occupied units,vacant units that are'for rent,"and vacart units that have been rented but not yet occupied.and
then multiplying by 100.
Source:U.S.Census Bureau,2010 Census.
ITEM NUMBER: C - 3
DATE: 11/22/11
t
isi`a R isie r7
CM
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report - City Manager's Office
Amendments to Existing Executive Management Contracts
to be Consistent with AB 1344
RECOMMENDATION:
Council amend the existing contract between the City of Atascadero and the City
Manager and provide the City Manager with authority to amend executive
management employee contracts consistent with the provisions of AB 1344.
DISCUSSION:
As a result of the crisis in the City of Bell and Vernon last year, the state legislature
drafted several bills in an attempt to address local government corruption,
transparency, compensation and process. While many of the bills did not pass
through the legislature, AB 1344 was passed and signed by the Governor.
This bill would, on and after January 1 , 2012, prohibit an employment contract for a
local agency executive, defined as the City Manager or Department Heads, from
providing an automatic renewal of a contract that provides for an automatic
compensation increase in excess of a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA). In other
words, if a contract renews from year to year, automatic cost of living increases in
excess of a COLA are not allowed. Increases in excess of a COLA would need to
be approved by the City Council. Contracts will be amended to clarify the City's
adherence to this provision.
Additionally, this bill would, on and after January 1 , 2012, require a contract
executed or renewed between a local agency and an officer or employee of the local
agency to include a provision that requires an officer or employee of a local agency
who is convicted of a crime involving an abuse of his or her office or position, as
defined, to fully reimburse the local agency for specified payments made by that
local agency to the officer or employee. The bill would also require an officer or
------I-- -- - --r 11- - I- -- --A- - .- ----- -,-1- -1 --r - .--- --�- -.-- -- --- -I---- - --r 1-.-
ITEM NUMBER: C - 3
DATE: 11/22/11
agency in the absence of a contractual obligation between the agency and the
officer or employee. Contracts will be amended to reflect these new requirements.
Finally, this bill would require the legislative body, or the presiding officer of the
legislative body, to provide notice of each meeting, including special meetings, on
the local agency's Internet website, if the local agency has one, as specified. In
addition, this bill would prohibit any legislative body from holding a special meeting
regarding the salary, salary schedule, or other form of compensation for any local
agency executive. However, the bill does not prohibit the discussion of the budget
during a special meeting.
Based on this language, changes need to be made to the contracts for the City
Manager and Department Heads. The recommended changes are as follows:
CITY MANAGER
Section 3 of the 2001 Employment Agreement between the City and Wade G.
McKinney shall be amended to include the following provision:
2. In the event that City Manager is convicted of a crime involving an abuse of
his office or position, as defined in California Government Code section 53243.4,
City Manager shall be required to fully reimburse the City in accordance with
California Government Code sections 53243, 53243. 1, and/or 53243.2.
Section 5.1 .a of the 2001 Employment Agreement between the City and Wade G.
McKinney reads:
Any across the board salary increases extended to City employees are
automatically provided to the City Manager.
In accordance with AB 1344, this section shall be deleted and the remaining
sections will be renumbered accordingly.
All other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONTRACTS
The City Manager shall amend all Employment Agreements between the City and its
Department Heads as provided below:
All termination provisions shall provide that In the event the Department Head is
convicted of a crime involving an abuse of his office or position, as defined in
California Government Code section 53243.4, the Department Head shall be
rontiinnrl fn hiffil raimhiirco tho ('if l in nrrnrr1nnrA With ('alifnrnin ('-r)unrmmnnt ('nAn
ITEM NUMBER: C - 3
DATE: 11/22/11
All other provisions of the Employment Agreements shall remain in full force and
effect.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact as a result of these contract amendments.
Attachment i
URBAN I FUTURES I .1 nciclwporattd.
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: October 17, 2011
TO: Warren Frace, Community Development Director
Callie Taylor, Associate Planner
FROM: Steven H. Dukett, Managing Principal
SUBJECT: Affordable Housing Projects and Programs Analysis
This report summarizes the results of the affordable housing meetings we recently
conducted with interested affordable housing agencies and community based
organizations. It also summarizes the results of separate discussions among the "City's
Working Group" with respect to the potential of the City/Agency establishing certain
single-family rehabilitation programs. The "City's Working Group" consisted of staff of
the City and Urban Futures, Inc. ("UFI").
This report consists of five (5) sections and two (2) exhibits. The report's sections
include: i) a synopsis of proposals; ii) an analyses of the Agency's funding capacity in its
Low- and Moderate-Income ("LMI' Housing Fund; iii) an analysis of the Agency's
funding prioritization options; iv) recommendations for eligible proposals; and v) an
analysis of funding alternatives for incomplete or ineligible proposals.
For the purpose of consistency, a more expansive description of each proposal along
with applicable site photographs, site plans and project elevations as well as a project
location map are included within Exhibit "A". In addition and for quick reference
purposes, a copy of the 2011 San Luis Obispo County Affordable Housing Worksheet is
included as Exhibit"B".
1. SYNOPSIS OF PROPOSALS
El Camino Homeless Organization (ECHO): ECHO is requesting an "undefined"
amount of Agency assistance to help them through the acquisition and development
process required for their proposed homeless shelter, which is located outside of the
Atascadero Redevelopment Area. ECHO has not yet prepared a business plan for their
project. Consequently, they have not requested a specific funding amount from the
Crestview Corporate Center-3111 N.Tustin Street,Suite 230,Orange,CA 92865-1753
Tel:(714)283-9334 www.urbanfuturesinc.com Fax:(714)283-5465
Page 2
Agency and, as such, their proposal is considered incomplete. The matter of
considering funding for ECHO may be possible once a viable business plan has been
prepared.
Habitat for Humanity.- Habitat initially requested assistance to acquire a bank-owned
site that could be developed as a 10-lot subdivision that could also include a
neighborhood park. The site is surrounded by Atascadero, Navajoa and San Andres
Avenues and is commonly known as the "Gerhart Site". However, due to uncertainties
associated with the current owner, the amount of assistance could not be defined. As a
consequence, during .July 2011, Habitat advised Atascadero staff that the Gerhardt Site
remains unavailable and, as such, Habitat would not be able to proceed with a project
on that site at this time. As a result, Habitat withdrew their proposal from consideration
during the current funding round.
Housing Authority of Sari Luis Obispo (HASL®)e HASLO is requesting $925,000 of
Agency financial assistance to acquire the existing 12-unit San Palo Inn, which is
located outside of the Atascadero Redevelopment Area. . Although the San Palo Inn is
a motel, it is effectively operating as and appears to outwardly be an apartment
complex that serves somewhat transient lower income clientele. Given the risk that the
San Palo Inn could ultimately become an eyesore and a magnet for public safety calls
(i.e., police and fire), this proposal deserves consideration.
North County Connection (NCC): NCC is requesting a $100,000 grant to help them
acquire the property they currently lease so that they can continue to operate their
social services programs on the site. NCC's proposal does not involve the creation of
affordable housing units and consequently is not eligible for funding from the LMI
Housing Fund. If the City is interested in assisting the NCC, then it may be that
matching SLO County's $35,000 Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG'�
allocation would be a reasonable starting point for consideration. The Council may also
wish to consider using a portion of the City's In-Lieu Affordable Housing funds for this
request.
Pacific Companies: Pacific is requesting a $3,180,000 loan to provide gap financing
for the development of Phase I of the Village at Oakhaven, which is a 30 unit multi-
family affordable housing project located at the northern end of the Atascadero
Redevelopment Area. To the extent that the Agency wishes to assist the development
of this project by providing gap financing in tandem with Low Income Housing Tax
Credits ("LIHTC"), then the Oakhaven project is worthy of further consideration.
However, given the $3,180,000 price tag, the Agency can only afford to assist one such
project at this time. Therefore, the merits of the Pacific proposal must be contrasted
against the ROEM proposal.
People's Self-Help Housing Corporation (PSHHC)a PSHHC is requesting $1
million-worth of assistance to provide down payment assistance loans to 24 low- and
Page 3
moderate-income home buyers. PSHHC has acquired the Oak Gove II 24-lot
subdivision (Tract 2640) from a bankruptcy trustee and will use their Mutual Self-Help
Program to develop the property. To the extent that the Agency wishes to assist with
the development of new affordable single-family homes, then consideration should be
give to the PSHHC proposal.
ROEM Development Corporation (ROEM)5 ROEM is requesting a $3,755,000 loan
to provide gap financing for the development of the Acacias apartment complex, which
is a 40 unit multi-family affordable housing project located within the Atascadero
Redevelopment Area. To the extent that the Agency wishes to assist the development
of this project by providing gap financing in tandem with funding made available with
LIHTCs and private activity bonds, then the Acacias project is worthy of further
consideration. However, given the $3,755,000 price tag, the Agency can only afford to
assist one such project at this time. Therefore, the merits of the ROEM proposal must
be contrasted against the Pacific proposal.
Transitional Food & Shelter, Inc. (TFS): TFS is proposing that the Agency acquire
for $599,000 and then lease with an option to purchase two duplexes located at 7860
Sinaloa Avenue for their future use as a special client homeless shelter. The property is
within the Atascadero Redevelopment Area. However, the TFS proposal is not eligible
for funding from the Agency's LMI Housing Fund. The City and TFS should work
together in an effort to identify and obtain alternative funding. Further, TFS has not yet
prepared a business plan and funding strategy for the relocation and rehabilitation
components of their project. Consequently, that component of their proposal is
considered incomplete. The matter of considering funding for TFS may be possible
once a viable business plan and funding strategy has been prepared for the relocation
and rehabilitation components of their project.
Housing Rehabilitation Programs: In addition to the consideration of the proposals
received from the interested affordable housing agencies and community based
organizations as described above, the City's Working Group also considered the
possibility of establishment of several City/Agency operated single-family rehabilitation
programs. Three program concepts are presented below:
® An Emergency Repairs Program (a small scale grant program -- $10,000 maximum);
® A Home Beautification Program (a mid-scale grant program -- $25,000 maximum);
and
® A Housing Improvement Program (a larger scale loan program -- $50,000
maximum).
In keeping with the foregoing, if the establishment of the housing rehabilitation
programs is desired, then it is recommended that the Agency consider allocating a first-
year budget for the programs in the amount of $670,000.
Page 4
II. ANALYSIS OF THE AGENCY'S FUNDING CAPACITY IN ITS LMI HOUSING
FUND
Based on financial data obtained from the City needed for the preparation of a Fiscal
Impact Analysis that compared the effects of ABX1 26 and ABX1 27, UFI has estimated
that the Agency had an approximately $4.15 million uncommitted cash balance in its
LMI Housing Fund as of June 30, 2011. This estimated was derived as follows:
Source Amount
June 30, 2010 Fund Balance' $3,445,975
June 30, 2010 Interest Earned' 121111
Estimated FY 2010-11 Tax Increment2 678,000
Estimated FY 2010-11 Interest Earnings2 16,000
TOTAL: $4,152,086
Notes: 1. From FY 2009-10 Agency Financial Statements; and 2, UFI estimate.
In addition, it is anticipated that the Agency will add another $694,000 in cash to its
LMI Housing Fund during FY 2011-12 (i.e., $678,000 from tax increment and $16,000
from interest earnings). Therefore and for planning purposes, the Agency should have
approximately $4.85 million available for worthy LMI Housing projects and/or programs
during FY 2011-12.
The above is contrasted against $9,530,000-worth of funding requests for projects or
programs that are eligible for LMI Housing Fund assistance (the projects that are not
eligible for LMT Housing Fund assistance, have an incomplete proposal or the proposal
was withdrawn are not included within that total), These funding requests are
compared, as follows:
Funding Assisted New Cost/ Covenants Cost/
Applicants' Reauested Units Units Unit obtained Covenant
Pacific (new MFR units) $3,180,000 30 30 $106,000 30 $106,000
ROEM (new MFR units) 3,755,000 42 42 $93,875 42 $93,875
HASLO (converted MFR units) 925,000 12 0 $77,834 6 $154,167
PSHHC (new SFR units) 1,000,000 24 24 $42,000 24 $42,000
HRP (rehabed SFR units)Z 670,000 24 0 $21,7003 N/A
Totals: $9,530,000 132 96 N/A 102 N/A
Notes; 1. ECHO, Habitat,NCC&TFS are not included due to the reasons described above.
2. HRP is a multi-year program.
3. $21,700 is the approximate average cost per unit only if the funding limits are reached for each project.
Page 5
It is important to mention that another possible source of funding for some of the
proposals received could be the City's Affordable Housing In-Lieu fund, which has a
current available balance of approximately $480,000.
III. ANALYSIS OF THE AGENCY°S FUNDING PRIORITIZATION OPTIONS
Since the above is almost equal to 200% of the available funding, it is necessary that
the Agency prioritize its funding decisions. Although there are a variety of ways to look
at this matter, there are three (3) options that seem to stand out as obvious
possibilities. They are:
Option 1: Only select the PSHHC, HASLO and HRP proposals. Under this scenario,
the maximum commitment the Agency could make would be $2,595,000,
which would leave a fund balance of approximately $226 million in the
LMI Housing Fund.
Option 2: Select either the Pacific project or the ROEM project for the development
of new multi-family residential units and select one additional proposal
(i.e., PSHHC, HASLO or HRP). Under this scenario, the maximum
commitment the Agency could make would be the combination of the
ROEM and the PSHHC proposals, which would equal $4,755,000, and
would leave a balance of approximately $95,000 in the LMI Housing
Fund.; or
Option 3: Only select either the Pacific project or the ROEM project for the
development of new multi-family residential units. Under this scenario,
the maximum commitment the Agency could make would equal
$3,755,000, which would leave a fund balance of approximately $1.1
million in the LMI Housing Fund; or
In addition to the foregoing, it may be possible that a portion of the proposal from
ECHO could be eligible for funding from the LMT Housing Fund if the applicant prepares
a viable business plan for their project. Therefore, if the Agency is interested in further
considering ECHO's proposal, then the Agency may wish to work with ECHO to assist
them in the preparation of a business plan for their project. The matter of considering
funding for ECHO may be possible once a viable business plan has been prepared.
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ELIGIBLE PROPOSALS
It is recommended that the Agency Board consider the projects and programs described
in this report and provide staff direction with respective to the merits, priority, funding
levels, follow-up actions, etc., as may be appropriate, for each.
Page 6
To the extent that the Agency Board wishes to consider entering into a binding
agreement for any of the projects or programs described above in the future, the
consideration of such agreements may only occur after the matter of the CRA/League
of California Cities lawsuit with respect to the Redevelopment Restructuring Acts (i.e.,
ABX1 26 & ABX1 27) has been adjudicated by the California Supreme Court. As of the
date of this report, the Supreme Court has indicated that it is their intent to rule on the
matter by January 15, 2012.
V. FUNDING ALTERNATIVES FOR INCOMPLETE OR INELIGIBLE PROPOSALS
As noted above, several of the proposals received were either incomplete (i.e., lacking a
specific request and a business plan) or are by their very nature ineligible for Agency
LMI Housing Funds. Nevertheless and in each case, the applicants provide significant
and valuable services to their client base and by inference the community as a whole.
Therefore, it is beneficial to review the possibility of funding alternatives for such
proposals.
ECHO: As described above and within Exhibit "A", the ECHO proposal is incomplete.
Therefore, if the Agency is interested in investigating ECHO's proposal, there are at
least four (4) approaches that may be explored to enable ECHO to complete a business
plan:
1. The Agency (via staff and consultants) could take an active role by providing
technical assistance to help ECHO develop a viable business plan and funding
strategy; or
2. ECHO could joint venture with another organization to help develop a viable
business pian and funding strategy; or
3. The City could provide ECHO with a small technical assistance grant from available
City/Agency resources to enable ECHO to hire its own experts to develop a viable
business plan and funding strategy; or
4. The Agency could recommend that ECHO use a small portion of its $300,000
reserves to hire its own experts to develop a viable business plan and funding
strategy.
The matter of considering funding for ECHO may be possible once a viable business
plan has been prepared.
NCC: As described above and within Exhibit"A", if the City is interested in assisting the
NCC, then there are at least two options to consider; i) the City could consider equally
matching the SLO County $35,000 CDBG contribution (i.e., $35,000); and ii) another
Page 7
possible source of funding could be the City's Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fund, which
has a current available balance of approximately $480,000.
TFS: As described above and within Exhibit "A", the TFS proposal is incomplete. As
the narrative above describes, if the City is interested in assisting the TFS, then there
are at least three funding options to consider:
o The City and TFS could work together in an eff=ort to identify and obtain alternative
funding, such as Emergency Shelter Grant ("ESG") funding (provided by HUD);
® Since the project site is within the Atascadero Redevelopment Area, the Agency
could consider the use of non-LMI Housing Fund resources; and
® Another possible source of funding could be the City's Affordable Housing In-Lieu
fund, which has a current available balance of approximately $480,000.
However, funding should be contingent upon TFS completing a business plan for the
relocation of existing tenants and the remodeling of the existing facilities. Given the
foregoing, if the Agency is interested in investigating TFS's proposal, there are at least
three (3) approaches that may be explored to enable TFS to complete a business plan:
1. The Agency (via staff and consultants) could take an active role by providing
technical assistance to help TFS develop a viable business plan and funding strategy
for the relocation and rehabilitation components of their project; or
2. TFS could joint venture with another organization to help develop a viable business
plan and funding strategy for the relocation and rehabilitation components of their
project; or
3. The City could provide TFS with a small technical assistance grant from available
City/Agency resources to enable TFS to hire its own experts to develop a viable
business plan and funding strategy for the relocation and rehabilitation components
of their project.
The matter of considering funding for TFS may be possible once a viable business plan
and funding strategy for the relocation and rehabilitation components of their project
has been prepared.
Epilogue: The process of seeking out affordable housing projects and programs for
consideration by the Agency has been very rewarding and productive endeavor.
Atascadero is very fortunate to be the focal point of interest and service delivery for so
many exceptionally qualified community-based organizations and housing entities. It is
no surprise that the Agency is over-subscribed with respect to funding requests.
Although the process of prioritization and allocation will undoubtedly be a difficult one,
Page 8
the outcome is sure to be of benefit to the City as a whole and to the low- and
moderate-income target population in particular. It is our firm's fervent wish that the
information is this report is not only useful to the Agency, but engages an on-going
process dedicated to improving, creating and/or preserving decent, safe and affordable
housing within Atascadero. In addition, without your involvement, support and
encouragement, this report would not have been possible.
S H D:ntm
Attachments
Page 9
EXHIBIT" A"
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSALS
For the purpose of consistency, the following narrative provides a more expansive
description of each the affordable housing-related proposals described in the foregoing
report. As applicable, project site photographs, site plans and/or renderings are also
included. Further, the last page of this Exhibit is a project location map.
ECHO: ECHO is a non-profit public service organization established in 2000 by a group
of private citizens to provide meals and shelter to the hungry and homeless in north
San Luis Obispo County. Over the last 11 years, ECHO has served approximately
138,000 hot home-cooked meals and provided 81,000 bed nights to the poorest people
in the community. These services were provided primarily through hundreds of
volunteers who cooked and served the meals, chaperoned the clients at night, and
provided the support services needed to operate the 35 bed shelter. ECHO's Client
Services team provides counseling and assistance to help clients become independent
and self-sufficient and to find affordable housing for themselves and/or their families.
For the past 5-6 years, ECHO has operated from facilities provided rent free by the First
Baptist Church of Atascadero, which is located at 6370 Atascadero Mall next to the
Atascadero High School and Atascadero Bible Church. The First Baptist Church has
advised ECHO that due to growth in their congregation and the needs of their ministries
for more space, it is necessary the ECHO relocate to another facility by May, 2012.
For the years 2008 through 2010, ECHO averaged approximately $168,000 in total
income versus about $104,000 in expenses. Approximately 52% of ECHO's income
comes from government and private grants. Approximately 511/0 of their income comes
from fundraising activities and the remainder comes from private and corporate
donations. ECHO uses its resources to compensate its three part-time staff members,
i.e., a shelter manager, case manager and volunteer coordinator and to pay expenses
for shelter administration, operations and utilities. Over the last several years, ECHO
has saved about $300,000 that could be used for the homeless shelter project.
ECHO is interested in acquiring a 0.95-acre parcel located at 6320 Atascadero Mali (APN
030-191-011) ("Site") from the Atascadero Bible Church (ABC), which is adjacent to
ECHO's current facilities. ECHO has advised that ABC will sell the Site to them for its
secured debt, which is estimated at $300,000. The Site includes four (4) residential
multi-family housing buildings with a total of eight (8) dwelling units. These units are
rented to low- and moderate-income persons. ECHO reports that several of the units
are in need of renovation; however, they have not prepared a rehabilitation cost
estimate. In addition, there is an undeveloped portion of the Site that ECHO believes is
sufficient in size to build an approximately 4,000 square foot homeless shelter and
Page 10
administrative office. ECHO is researching the suitability and economic feasibility of
developing a pre-manufactured, modular building on the Site; however, they have not
prepared a development budget or an operating pro forma for the project.
ECHO has indicated that if they are successful in reaching an agreement with ABC, they
do not believe they are in a position to manage the housing units on a long-term basis.
Their vision is to ultimately use the existing units for ancillary services and for
temporary housing for their clients once the existing tenants relocate in the future on
their own accord. Given the limited availability of affordable housing units in the
community, the voluntary relocation of existing tenants could take a period of years to
complete. ECHO has not forecasted the economic effect of the transition of the
residential units.
On an overall basis, ECHO has not yet prepared a business plan for their project.
Consequently, they have not requested a specific funding amount from the Agency.
Without a business plan, ECHO may not yet be ready to tackle a development project or
take on property management responsibilities at this time. However, if the Agency
wishes to consider ECHO for funding, it is likely that the Agency will need to guide
ECHO through the entire process, from conceptualization and business plan
development through project completion. This type of City involvement would be very
time intensive, and the Agency would need to dedicate City staff or hire a consultant to
develop, construct, and manage the project. Other possibilities might include ECHO
joint venturing with another organization that would have experience with project
development and property management matters or ECHO could hire technical experts
to help them through this process.
In addition, the California Community Redevelopment Law ("CCRL") does not provide
general authority to redevelopment agencies to use Low- and Moderate-Income ("LMI'
Housing funds for homeless shelters (see CCRL §33334.2(e)). Homeless shelters are
typically built or acquired with alternative funding (e.g., non-housing redevelopment
funding for projects located within a redevelopment area [or are of direct benefit to a
redevelopment area] could be used. In this case, the Site is outside of the Atascadero
Redevelopment Area. However, costs associated with acquiring and renovating the
existing units, providing site and frontage improvements, and that would otherwise
bring the property up to standard (if conditions of development require it) can be
funded wholly or partially from the LMI Housing Fund. Unfortunately, the potential
impact on LMI funds cannot be established without a project business plan.
Given the above, if the Agency is interested in investigating ECHO's proposal, there are
at least four (4) approaches that may be explored:
1. The Agency (via staff and consultants) could take an active role by providing
technical assistance to help ECHO develop a viable business plan and funding
strategy; o
Page 11
2. ECHO could joint venture with another organization to help develop a viable
business plan and funding strategy; or
3. The City could provide ECHO with a small technical assistance grant from available
City/Agency resources to enable ECHO to hire its own experts to develop a viable
business plan and funding strategy; o
4. The Agency could recommend that ECHO use a small portion of its $300,000
reserves to hire its own experts to develop a viable business plan and funding
strategy.
The matter of considering funding for ECHO may be possible once a viable business
plan has been prepared.
Photos of the site are provided on the following page.
x'.LY"h. J>. �. „ .A`L .1:..7 t R `a..,t� ���. •1y-�``�."�`tY�`L��%x q� '.�... 1.`-.``-,,,'��r^. \ 1�+�
,...:, .. «_ ....._.:xS.Y„�c�2?�z. :..s...-a1 .it?��.,�w�.,�.�...�...,r..;"2,........�'C`�"i,...Xn:,.•>..- �.-.�'3'\�''ri..�e,.
` wymate-
vis
MW
set
x s
M
• �
f •
FIT x °p g E
Aup
r° a
ry �
IOWA-
2
x
a
i s
z
.ice Wi: ,x.,r•;-r,fis
;..,
oy
OF
NAM
Page 13
Habitat for Humanity- During the interview, Habitat's Executive Director explained
the Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative ("NRI") that, among other things, includes the
Brush With Kindness ("BWK") Program. The BWK Program is viewed as an
enhancement to Habitat's core mission of creating more single-family units for very-low-
income homebuyers. Basically, the BWK Program provides assistance to lower-income
homeowners who need help sprucing up their properties that are located within a
neighborhood in which Habitat is developing a new home.
Habitat is actively looking for single-family home sites along the Central Coast, including
Atascadero. Habitat initially requested assistance to acquire a bank-owned site that
could be developed as a 10-lot subdivision that could also include a neighborhood park.
The site is surrounded by Atascadero, Navajoa and San Andres Avenues and is
commonly known as the "Gerhart Site". However, due to uncertainties associated with
the current owner, the amount of assistance could not be defined. Several other
potential sites in Atascadero were also mentioned as well as a general interest in any
others that may become available.
Habitat needs assistance in acquiring buildable lots and needs soft financing from the
Agency to make such acquisitions feasible. Habitat estimates that the construction of a
typical 3-bedroom home will cost between $120,000 and $140,000. Habitat effectively
fills an important affordable housing niche.
During July 2011, Habitat advised Atascadero staff that the Gerhardt Site remains
unavailable and, as such, Habitat would not be able to proceed with a project on that
site at this time. As a result, Habitat withdrew their proposal from consideration during
the current funding round.
A site pian and elevations are on the following page.
Page 14
€ Atasras�ero ►venue "Tragl�Park,"P� ;:`$
Site Plan View:
...............:..
,
�..:........
..........
............
................:.. 5
E
a�.
Y
r•
lily
Raw
Asx lilt,
d
A 5 y
SAW got
ViUr.;
(€ ��r'`
Y
�$''it
0]°
.. : <m5.t LWi 3
}
:
4 -
E
:
_
�ex`: ;ted:=-3
.Vy
, c
. Wi
:..:..........
... . . .. . :....... .. ...
BEEN;.
NONE a,
.................INNER,
................ .
...:::..:..:..........:...............
..........
.:.:..... .:
......... .....
. ...........
........ ..
=u:
:wU ;
...::......:.:..
T..
. .. v.: .. .<�
c,
a.
,
: - .
,S :•� <
NO
YM1.
•.:-:,-�...,^�•s�,,.. �i2`\",\\ `�'- tea\o os.-
�• k
:......_. hk<s;;..'.�'•r��:.:.:....: ...:..:::..:c'::�:"� X93
•fir-•,�`�^��
-
,. .. ,.-.,.-.—,.,«.,'3
Page 15
HASLO: HASLO is requesting Agency financial assistance to acquire the existing 12-
unit San Palo Inn, located at 4900 San Palo Road, just south of San Anselmo Road and
east of the US 101 Freeway. The site is located outside of the Atascadero
Redevelopment Area. The surrounding area is predominately a rural residential single-
family neighborhood in good overall condition. The units are behind a defunct
automobile sales lot that is slated to be redeveloped as a medical office facility in the
near term. Although the San Palo Inn is a motel located in the Commercial Tourist
zone, it is effectively operating as and appears to outwardly be an apartment complex
that serves somewhat transient lower income clientele. The units are arrayed in six
duplex-style buildings in which each rentable unit has a kitchen and separate bedroom.
The manager's unit has two bedrooms. Given the obvious lack of proper property
management and tenant selection, the property appears to be headed toward decline.
The property is currently listed for sale with an asking price of $925,000. As a general
rule, listing amounts tend to set the upper limit of value/cost and are usually a starting
point for negotiations that could result in a lower acquisition cost. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, if the purchase and sale price was $925,000, then the Agency's cost per unit
would be $77,834. However, since the San Palo Inn is located outside of the
Atascadero Redevelopment Area, the CCRL limits the inclusionary housing credits the
Agency could receive to 50% of affordability covenants obtained. As a result, the
Agency would earn 6 inclusionary housing credits if all 12 of the units were restricted as
to occupancy and affordability. On this basis, the Agency's cost per countable
affordability covenant would be $154,167. Additional funding may be needed to make
necessary improvements or to correct deferred maintenance on the units or the site. It
is anticipated that all or a portion of such work could be funded from the project's cash
flow.
A General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and CUP Amendment would be required to
be processed in order to permit the change from motel to residential units. HASLO did
not specify an affordability structure, other than they tend to gravitate to the very-low-
income population and would provide 55-year long affordability covenants consistent
with the needs of the Agency. Therefore, subject to further negotiations, the San Palo
Inn project could provide 11 very-low-income units and 1 moderate income unit (i.e.,
the Manager's unit). HASLO proposes soft residual receipts-based financing from the
Agency. Given the risk that the San Palo Inn could ultimately become an eyesore and a
magnet for public safety calls (i.e., police and fire), this proposal deserves
consideration.
Site photos are on the following pages.
lousing Autht�xity o Sari Luis Obisg i €
M.
K
t
1.s A.
�aa,Ex.
Lmor
=tai.
L•':;AIwSi:.., b - M 7 i S �'�.ti��a .,;nr.::. .:
.A
:Y n
a br:g �t SNE
q ..'
,y
.M�
v
ro
`�:^ •tic:..
0 ti
�3
r
......._ ......:.:.r+'-,:."�_:..:_. ..<.:5;;?:=air:x.:=�::�;;:;..;:.a•:�::_._::....::::.:..7.r_<,,...:,_...
..........:..:....:...—,..._..._,...,,::.;:•.�:mea•=::=�:x>:.-:�:-:versa:=... - _ -
s.xr�i�x=.i
r:
Page 17
North County Connection: The NCC is a non-profit corporation that provides
specialized social services and resources targeted at assisting individuals and families
prevent or recover from substance abuse, other addictions and related problems. NCC
is currently located at 8600 Atascadero Avenue, which is an approximately two-acre site
located in a rural residential single-family neighborhood. The site was formerly used as
a church, a pre-school and for residential purposes. NCC is currently renting the
property. The site is located outside of the Atascadero Redevelopment Area.
The property owner has offered to sell the site to NCC for $450,000 (the assumed
appraised value). The site is currently encumbered with one secured loan with a
balance of $185,000, The seller is willing provide NCC with a seller's purchase money
loan in the amount of $265,000, which is the difference between the $450,000
purchase price and the $185,000 remaining balance on the existing loan. NCC has
obtained a commitment from SLO County for $35,000 of CDBG funding to contribute
toward the $185,000 gap. NCC is seeking funding from other entities to fund the
$150,000 remaining gap. They have requested that the Agency provide $100,000 of
this amount. NCC felt confident that they could raise $50,000 from small donors.
If NCC is able to purchase the site, they intend to ultimately remodel the existing
building so that a few transitional housing units could be provided to their clientele.
NCC estimates that an additional $50,000 would be needed for this purpose. The site
at 8600 Atascadero is a 2.14-acre SFR-X (1/2 acre minimum) zoned property. Based on
the lot size and zoning, there is potential to subdivide the existing lot to create
additional lots that could be further developed with housing opportunities for NCC. If
the property is subdivided, some lots could be sold off to create profits for construction
of housing on the remaining lots. They have also considered buying the adjoining
residential property located at 8400 Atascadero, Avenue (same owner) for the purpose
of providing additional transitional housing units. The acquisition of the property and
the continued operation of their social services program will not require any new
Planning entitlements. A Conditional Use Permit Amendment would be required in
order to begin to provide overnight use of the property for clients. A Parcel Map or
Planned Development overlay would be needed in order to subdivide the property or
develop it with additional housing units in the future.
The residential component of their ultimate concept is currently not before the Agency
for consideration at this time. With that as a given, NCCs proposal to acquire the 8600
Atascadero Avenue property is solely for the purpose of continuing their ability to offer
social services to their clients on the site. As such, NCCs proposal is not eligible for LMI
Housing Fund consideration. Therefore, alternative funding would need to be
identified. Federal CDBG funding may be a reasonable place to start a search. In
addition, because the site is not within a redevelopment area, it would be difficult, but
not necessarily impossible to use non-housing redevelopment funding. In any event, it
seems that if the City is interested in assisting the NCC, then it may be that equally
matching the SLO County CDBG contribution (i.e., $35,000) would be a reasonable
Page 18
starting point for consideration. Another possible source of funding could be the City's
Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fund.
Site photos are on the following page.
Page 19
w-
�' 8600 Atastac9ero Rvesaize(Existing BICC situ. M1#
Site Location Aerial View:
Ik
r 4
S` t7 f
J r
j a
\
\ L t
t
Site Location Street Level Views`
i
F is Y" ss'S- 'r•�^,?r r x3Lsa",r'r.9 '� "\'*,'n `3 Aa'r'a r;r '�'r?� -,.,{? "m' A r�
�,H ��3,z�;c� ��c_�`�-�`xv e x�.t'<,�,.F,""''�,`'`r u.•�;�^u�:' 'rva 4�?^,�..,%�>•�.`i.,y.-����r.;�. �v.,.,-r � 1
�� 'i�.,»w�,,..,.�.��=�,� a>•rY�,.re �n x�',^., u .�' z � fid^.-Q x�rh .fir�r,�.�����'.�' �`�?`:' �� ..w-���`�-�"v
v .YR,"hi'�X'1,,,'F�, C ,�✓T \ -.{ § h� S.r _ .. y y..+.IZ^( Y „ ,C � JW
�.�� �'?xiz�`3-rr�' s �r sw•�c '� ..3rK �` ��kyFy"�"� � "y �.�Z ,q x C'," '
., 'vweu,.�:,.. ��"z• aw...mtw^.• .__ ...,�a>�yuyn.z�f;_ .:«1 ^:..n �'.......r. ::.i� ,. -
Page 20
Pacific Companies.- Pacific is a competent and proven developer with extensive
experience with California Tax Credit Allocation Committee ("CTCAC'� and California
Debt Limit Allocation Committee ("CDLAC") funding mechanisms. Pacific is proposing to
develop Phase I of the Village at Oakhaven, an entitled 62 townhome development site
located on the east side of EI Camino Real, south of Santa Cruz Road, between the
Hilltop Mobile and Ru Park and the Camino Del Roble Mobile Estates. The site consists
of 5.65 acres at the northern end of the City. Phase I is proposed to consist of 30 units
within the western half of the property. The proposed density is approximately 11
dwelling units per acre, which appears to be compatible with the adjoining mobilehome
parks, but reflects a somewhat greater density than most of the rural residential single-
family housing within close proximity to the site.
As proposed, Phase I will require approximately $8.7 million to develop. Pacific
proposes to fund the project with 4% LIHTCs (from CTCAC), a commercial first loan,
gap financing from the Agency and deferred developer fees. The proposed affordability
restrictions would be 30% at 50% and 70% at 60% (i.e., 9 very-low-income (50%)
units, 20 low-income (60%) and one manager unit (120°/x, assumed)). The Agency
would receive 55-year long covenants on all units. Pacific projects the financing gap for
their project to be $3,180,000, for which they are requesting soft residual receipts-
based financing from the Agency. Pacific proposes a 30-year term with 3% simple
interest. Under this scenario, the Agency's cost per unit would be $106,000. It is
unknown when Phase II would be feasible.
Notwithstanding Pacific's expertise, the Oakhaven project is designed for townhomes,
not apartments. In that regard, townhome developments usually are less dense than
apartment projects and tend to be more expensive to develop due to the less efficient
use of the land. For comparison purposes, the Oakhaven project has a density of about
11 dwelling units per acre as compared to the ROEM project (which is designed as an
apartment project, as further described below) that has more than twice the density at
about 23.5 dwelling units per acre.
To the extent that the Agency wishes to assist the development of new multi-family
affordable units by providing gap financing in tandem with LIHTCs, then the Oakhaven
project is worthy of further consideration. However, given the price tag, the Agency
can only afford to assist one such project at this time. Therefore, the merits of the
Pacific proposal must be contrasted against the ROEM proposal.
A site plan and elevations are on the following page.
Page 21
`° a± "aT Dash e P
. . .... . . . .. .. ..
Site Plan View:
ML-
�g
g,
9 1f� :...
w
�a >
g �
5i.te Pla.h
Master aha evela�itia _
!.. <> � ! ter• ,.� ',�
{{{
_
%:;:P
Page 22
PSHHC. PSHHC, is a non-profit corporation dedicated to providing affordable housing
and programs leading to self-sufficiency for low-income families, seniors, and other
special needs groups along California's Central Coast. PSHHC offers a variety of
affordable single-family and multi-family housing programs. One of their core programs
is the Mutual Self-Help Program, which assists lower income families finance and build
their own homes. Over the years, they have assisted over 1,500 families reach this
goal within the Central Coast Region. The Mutual Self-Help Program is similar to
Habitat's single-family housing program, but PSHHC does it on steroids! The primary
difference between the two approaches is that the PSHHC Mutual Self-Help Program is
oriented at producing single-family residences in large batches, not one or two at a time
that is more typical of Habitat.
PSHHC has acquired the Oak Gove IT 24-lot subdivision (Tract 2640) from a bankruptcy
trustee and will use their Mutual Self-Help Program to develop the property. They
anticipate obtaining primary "first-lien" financing for this project from the U. S.
Department of Agriculture ("USDA") Rural Development Administration. PSHHC has
requested $1 million of Agency assistance to create a fund from which land acquisition
financing may be provided to income-eligible homebuyers. PSHHC envisions the
amount of each loan could vary depending on need; however, on an overall basis the
loans are expected to average about $42,000 per family. The concept is that the
Agency loan would be structured as a soft second lien loan for the homebuyers. The
term of this type of loan would generally track with the first loan's term, and in some
instances, may take longer to repay. In addition, each family would be credited with
equity consistent with their contributed home construction labor.
Consistent with CCRL § 33334.3(f)(1)(C), the minimum term of the Agency's
affordability covenant for a "self-help" housing project must be 15 years. However,
with respect to the PSHHC proposal, if the Agency were to fund self-help program silent
second down payment assistance loans, then the term of the affordability covenant
would be 15 years or the date that the Agency's loan is fully repaid, whichever is
longer. It is important to note that since the Oak Gove II 24-lot subdivision is located
within the Atascadero Redevelopment Area, the Agency will incur a four (4) unit
inclusionary housing obligation (i.e., 15% of the 24 unit project when rounded equals
4). Given that the project is intended to be 100% affordable, it is in the Agency's best
interests to provide PSHHC enough funding for at least four (4) silent second down
payment assistance loans (i.e., $168,000) in order to avoid the occurrence of a four (4)
unit inclusionary housing deficit.
A site plan and elevations are on the following page.
Page 23
�:.f..5.wc�• '�.�.,vc`,��..c...�,� :._ u�,...b, �.,...� ��•�� ,.. �..;,��,a,:.,:..i:;,'� �,.�o41c4.'�1,"i�-�� ��c'ti'�a,+is,
r
t �2�5-E1 Camino#teal J Malaya:St,(oak:'Grgrie�l PD)
Site Plan View: t
,
- � 5ei
:r
v
r
• ...r _ .may
n a`
:
i
i
�.y
•.-`.�.' .M..^M.µ.•, 'p.-. ML .'«,<,g�.-.:..,,-.-.,`•...-.-..;,,-(_.-.-_.,.,«_....-.p_.,-..>..,,. _..,_.�t i....�x` .-:_.._ .... .......�.�.�-.m:.
.. .'-'
g
-- ,;;.,vim-• - - -
_..
F [�
p
:s
} �� 'TFY �� -��.�aNJF Y 4F� .✓'.: �'s`+'3p'-4�'yrK`v y �uS•,,. .
f 1 •
AI elZ'•.�nitr.4i•ZYlJt: �Z1[vt�.'. �4.,FSGYi (.'fiY.CL SS«.:N;' :i
..,....,-.«....:,,.....,.._.«.............-....ems,____._....._._. .... ........._„_. ........,.-....,...,.._..... _,._.,._.,......_.-.».........��....... ..,......... ...-._W..�..�...--.-......,,-...._:.«......-.�.���..-.,..........�.�::.
Page 24
ROEM: POEM is a competent and proven developer with extensive experience with
CTCAC and CDLAC funding mechanisms. ROEM is proposing to develop a 40-unit multi-
family apartment project on an approximately 1.7-acre site located at 4711 El Camino
Real, which is between San Anselmo Road and San Jacinto Avenue on the east side of
the street. The project is known as the Acacias Development, The site is just north of
downtown and is within the El Camino Real commercial corridor. The residential
neighborhoods located easterly of the site are typical of smaller lot urban
developments. The project is designed to take public access from El Camino Real and
will not contribute to local residential traffic patterns. The 40-unit project is fully
entitled, with an approved density of about 23.5 dwelling units per acre. ROEM has
also informed staff that they are open to discussing a redesign of the project if the
Agency would like to see any changes in design or density to make the project more
feasible. They have recently completed construction of a similar low- and moderate-
income apartment development in San Luis Obispo, known as "The Village at Broad
Street."
ROEM estimates that the project will require approximately $10.8 million to develop.
They propose to fund the project with 4% LIHTCs (CTCAC), private activity bonds
(CDLAQ and gap financing from the Agency. The proposed affordability restrictions
would be 10% at 50% and 90% at 60% (i.e., 4 very-low-income (50%) units, 35 low-
income (60%) units and one manager unit (120%, assumed)). The Agency would
receive 55-year long covenants on all units. ROEM projects the financing gap for their
project to be $3,755,000, for which they are requesting soft residual receipts-based
financing from the Agency. Under this scenario, the Agency's cost per unit would be
$93,875.
To the extent that the Agency wishes to assist the development of new multi-family
affordable units by providing gap financing in tandem with funding made available with
LIHTCs and private activity bonds, then the Acacias Apartments project is worthy of
further consideration. However, given the price tag, the Agency can only afford to
assist one such project at this time. Therefore, the merits of the ROEM proposal must
be contrasted against the Pacific proposal.
A site plan and elevations are on the following page.
Page 25
040�° c> ,t �'•ti'"+:an u"^£`�...r a, �, 4. o-, u T., ::'� '.._`.o-.' £c��:•:- L':" 'r-•, ?=- -�,
47 El Camino Real (Acacias PD
}
Site Plan View:
C Y
#4
f ; ' a. J J'�..h.vat'..i...wf..��Wl••
...rt
'.:........_..............
...... W �..
:
-i— _ a > •'"`-'"`--• �S
�.. WX
a
'3YiCz�FX.�'.'3`T •� .'_ i'�.4- - �'� -4. �'mStae _
- C
•�.._��..'w. ,_, xP..'+_. �. �--ter^-.^
mz �4 d
...$x .gD ..xa y, d ep iw• >a
....
iF°>§�.....____........�x.. r.,.x. ..mi.. .. ... .. w.G.' ....._...............
ti4.1 2P.
r t:
j j cht-1-711-7i, -�g:f�9 i h r-0 rtr c. r 1
�W
. .. .......:.:..
_._.._ .
L '
111 ,
WILDING A- FRGN"l
BU +xON, T
.
0
BUILDINGS A&B END .4.:. .
-BUILDING C END
I ICEY3k�l'I'ES
i �.•' �; ���., �" ;..: •ter., -.�.
.' or _
....... ..._..._.........,„
Page 26
Transitional Food & Shelter, Inc.., TFS, a 100% volunteer non-profit organization,
currently rents five apartments located at 5455 El Camino Real and rents motel rooms
from time-to-time as client needs require and their resources will allow. The TFS rental
units are used to provide temporary shelter to extremely-low income persons who are
homeless, have a severe disability or medical condition and need short-term shelter to
recover from a medical calamity or until otherwise transitioned into more permanent
housing. Although TFS temporarily houses their clients within their leased and rented
facilities, their core purpose is to provide social services, either directly or through
referral, to their clients.
TFS is proposing that the Agency acquire and then lease with an option to purchase two
duplexes located at 7860 Sinaloa Avenue to TFS. The property is within the boundaries
of the Atascadero Redevelopment Project Area, The property is currently listed for
$599,000 and is occupied. The use of the property by TFS would ultimately require the
relocation of the existing tenants. Subsequent to relocating existing tenants, TFS would
transition their clients from the El Camino Real location to the Sinaloa Avenue location.
Experience suggests that implementing a relocation program for low- and moderate-
income tenants would be a sensitive, lengthy and expensive undertaking. In addition,
certain physical modification must be made to the property so that it may accommodate
the operations of TFS. TFS has not yet developed a scope of work for their renovation
plan or a funding strategy for their required improvements. Although TFS has
acknowledged that costs for relocation and physical modifications would be incurred,
they have not yet prepared a business plan for these portions of their project. Further
analysis would be required to determine what such costs could be and how TFS would
fund them.
As noted previously, the CCRL does not provide general authority to redevelopment
agencies to use Low- and Moderate-Income C'LMI'} Housing funds for homeless
shelters (see CCRL §33334.2(e)), Homeless shelters are typically built or acquired with
alternative funding (e.g., non-housing redevelopment funding for projects located
within a redevelopment area [or are of direct benefit to a redevelopment area] could be
used. In this case, the property identified is within the Atascadero Redevelopment
Area. TFS, has confirmed that they are willing to work with the City in an effort to
identify and obtain alternative funding. Therefore, if the City is interested in assisting
the TFS, then there are at least three (3) funding options to consider:
® The City and TFS could work together in an effort to identify and obtain alternative
funding, such as Emergency Shelter Grant ("ESG") funding (provided by HUD);
® Since the project site is within the Atascadero Redevelopment Area, the Agency
could consider the use of non-LMI Housing Fund resources; and
* Another possible source of funding could be the City's Affordable Housing In-Lieu
fund, which has a current available balance of approximately $480,000.
Page 27
Further, funding should be contingent upon TFS completing a business plan for the
relocation of existing tenants and the remodeling of the existing facilities. Given the
foregoing, if the Agency is interested in investigating TFS's proposal, there are at least
three (3) approaches that may be explored:
1. The Agency (via staff and consultants) could take an active role by providing
technical assistance to help TFS develop a viable business plan and funding strategy
for the relocation and rehabilitation components of their project; or
2. TFS could joint venture with another organization to help develop a viable business
plan and funding strategy for the relocation and rehabilitation components of their
project; or
3. The City could provide TFS with a small technical assistance grant from available
City/Agency resources to enable TFS to hire its own experts to develop a viable
business plan and funding strategy for the relocation and rehabilitation components
of their project.
The matter of considering funding for TFS may be possible once a viable business plan
and funding strategy has been prepared for the relocation and rehabilitation
components of their project.
Site photos are on the following page.
&gw7l, , `w.,
s ,_'
- -.,a,''�,.'�1 .�. -'�- z �;x.:.^s:°�`^•�""a�w:A xi%ate' "?.-., _.:�M.. 'a��u-.. .� .mmmt•
i+
I
c;...',,��.MI
.:
l
't '^� c•f E, ,
a o
,
(� k "'RST.'.. '.•R
.......,; a
mm
rag * f f
-
.s�
_ `}rx- ...4.....� Mom -
............
qu.\.va.a •. \�,..*a^a '``'� _ �was z ���� ��,��'• ����a'.xhrc�:,:
�:Tc \ 1T..� �.. '<�\�..,.tE >:�,\ ,` � Ccs.''' -:`2` F�'�';xr,,.e�c Vic,, y•.
k4, M."`-.��-§ .:�,. '4'`,•'"' •�,,'.x� �..:..fi;-!'.e'Xw"a-:
T'Sav' '•z ,z..,, ;,+ Lh ^y'� n'—:in„'„ '% �''s, aa�.��ai`��R;-=..?_' } =
Page 29
Housing Rehabilitation Programs: In addition to the consideration of the proposals
received from the interested affordable housing agencies and community based
organizations described above, the City's Working Group also considered the possibility
of the establishment of a City/Agency operated single-family housing rehabilitation
program ("HRP"), The goal of these programs is to help and induce homeowners to
repair their houses, who otherwise could not afford to do so, and to beautify the
neighborhoods in which those homes exist. The HRP concepts that were reviewed by
the City's Working Group are summarized below. It is important to note that these
program concepts would require the preparation of detailed policy guidelines and
operational "desk manuals" prior to their implementation. In each case, an applicant
would have to prove both "economic" and "physical" need to be eligible.
Emeraencv Repairs Program (City-Wide)
The purpose of the Emergency Repairs Program ("ERP") would be to assist very-low-
income Atascadero homeowners whose income does not exceed 50% of the County
median income (see Exhibit "B"), as adjusted by family size by providing grants for
emergency repairs to structural, mechanical, plumbing or electrical components of their
home. It is suggested that the grant maximum limit be $10,000. It is recommended
that the cost of installing smoke detectors, water heater strapping, and "low flow"
toilets be granted as an addition to the $10,000 limit.
Home Beautification Program (City-Wide at 80% and RDA at 120%)
The purpose of the Home Beautification Program ("HBP") would be to assist low- to
moderate-income Atascadero homeowners by providing grants to correct any exterior
physical deficiency that is visible from a public right-of-way. The HBP would have two
income eligibility tiers. It would be available City-wide to low-income homeowners
whose income does not exceed 80% of the County median income (see Exhibit "B"), as
adjusted by family size. It would be available within the redevelopment project area to
moderate-income homeowners whose income does not exceed 120% of the County
median income (see Exhibit "B"), as adjusted by family size. The purpose of the
eligibility tiers is to place emphasis on improving homes that are located within the
redevelopment area (i.e., to assist in alleviating conditions of physical deterioration). It
is suggested that the grant maximum limit be $25,000. It is recommended that the
cost of installing smoke detectors, water heater strapping, and "low flow" toilets be
granted as an addition to the $25,000 limit.
Page 30
Housinq_1MgLQyement
The purpose of the Housing Improvement Program ("HIP`} would be to assist low- to
moderate-income homeowners by providing low- and no-interest deferred loans to
rehabilitate their single-family owner-occupied residences in the City of Atascadero,
The HIP would fund general rehabilitation with a priority on health and safety related
renovations. Room additions and the initial construction of luxury items would be
ineligible. The HIP would have two income eligibility tiers. It would be available City-
wide to low-income homeowners whose income does not exceed 80% of the County
median income (see Exhibit "B"), as adjusted by family size. It would be available
within the redevelopment project area to moderate-income homeowners whose income
does not exceed 120% of the County median income (see Exhibit "B"), as adjusted by
family size. The purpose of the -eligibility tiers is to place emphasis on improving homes
that are located within the redevelopment area (i.e., to assist in alleviating conditions of
physical deterioration). It is suggested that the loan maximum limit be $50,000. It is
recommended that the cost of installing smoke detectors, water heater strapping, and
"low flow" toilets be granted as an addition to the $50,000 limit.
It is suggested that all Program deferred loans have a term of 30 years and bear simple
interest (i.e., non-compounding) at the rates as noted below.
Family Income Interest Rate Term
80% or less of County median 0% Deferred for 30 years
More than 80%, but not more that 100% 1% Deferred for 30 years
More that 100%, but not more than 120% 2% Deferred for 30 years
Deferred loans are due on the earliest event of sale, transfer or expiration of 30 years.
It is suggested that HIP loans not be in a junior position beyond a third trust deed.
Further, it is suggested that the combination of all indebtedness secured by the assisted
property (including the HIP loan) not exceed 100% of the assisted property's post
rehabilitation estimated value.
Regulatory Agreement for HBP and HIP
It is suggested that as a prerequisite to funding, eligible applicants agree to enter into a
Regulatory Agreement with the Agency that requires the home owner to maintain the
exterior improvements financed by either the NBP and/or HIP for 10 years (which is the
theoretical economic life of the improvements) from the date that the certificate of
completion is executed. The Regulatory Agreement would be recorded with the County
of San Luis Obispo and would run with the land. Pursuant to the Regulatory
Agreement, if after a 30-day notice to cure the home owner remains in default (i.e.,
fails to maintain or initiate the maintenance of the improvements), then the Agency will
Page 31
have the right, but not the obligation, to perform the needed maintenance and may lien
the property for the cost of such work.
Coordination of Housing Prq ram Components
It is recommended that the Agency's Housing Programs be coordinated, meaning that
subject to applicant income eligibility, they could be used in conjunction with one
another. The coordination of the Programs would ensure the highest possible
community impact.
If the Agency desires to establish the housing rehabilitation programs described above,
it is recommended that the budget for these programs be established in incremental
units with the idea of setting a goal for the number of projects per category to be
funded and then multiplying those numbers by the maximum funding limits per
category. In other words, if the Agency wished to fund 12 ERPs, then the capital
budget for the ERP would be $120,000 (i.e., 12 x $10,000 = $120,000).
In addition, the Agency will need to fund the operating costs for managing the housing
rehabilitation programs. Because of the labor-intensive nature of assisting home-
owners who typically are not experts at assessing rehabilitation needs and/or
contracting for home improvements, it is recommended that the Agency fund the
operating costs of its housing rehabilitation programs at a ratio of approximately 1 to 4
as compared to the capital portion of the housing rehabilitation programs. For
example, if the capital portion of the housing rehabilitation programs was $400,000,
then the operating budget should be at least $100,000. In this example, the total
budget for the housing rehabilitation programs would be $500,000. In addition, given
the need for specialized skills to operate housing rehabilitation programs, it is
recommended that the Agency consider performing the bulk of its program operations
though a professional services agreement with a qualified vendor or vendors.
The first year budget for the housing rehabilitation programs should also include an
allocation for establishing program policies and procedures (i.e., a complete desk
manual for each of the programs). UFI believes an allocation of $20,000 should be
sufficient to cover these expenses.
In keeping with the foregoing, if the establishment of the housing rehabilitation
programs described above is desired, then UFI recommends that the Agency consider
allocating a first-year budget for the programs in the amount of $670,000. This
recommendation is based on the following:
Page 32
Program Unit Goals Unit Max Total
ERP 12 $10,000 $120,000
HBP 8 $25,000 2001000
HIP 4 $50,000 200,000
Operations 1 25% of above 1301000
Establishment 1 LS 20,000
TOTAL: $670,000
Further, the above total amount is slightly less than the tax increment that is projected
to accrue to the LMI Housing Fund during FY 2011-12 and therefore the funding level
should be sustainable over time.
LOCATION MAP
A location map for the site-based proposals is provided on the following page.
r t
d" '4yW
1225 El Cam6o 1.Alalaya Sat,
owa
tiff
bw
} ■ '3"
+� `��, ire �'` �� ar" ��'� ��A*-.tt" ,fir. �■+
! 67
ROEM BewOPMOlt 'r
f 4711 El Comm Rew
x
kcadas
'■+w"w ar. �� '��#''" '� "'f„, is ``
900 San Palo
Urmntly San Palo Inn
WON W,
ECHO
i i
6-320 AWOL, :. Shefter
law
`aet" r� "� .A,:fi..•r# 'rte :_
Habitti for HumantyAtasc
°.■R -s ■
Ave
.ai?.' -�`Ynr6 'f��'`:
�f »«.c..'�. :�,i�
r��eAgl i C&bre«1
;0
�y x
ing NCC site
Page 34
EXHIBIT"'B"
2011 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
AFFORDABLE HOUSING WORKSHEET
A copy of the 2011 San Luis Obispo County Affordable Housing Worksheet is included
on the following page.
N N r
H L
V g K n¢ Y O p
t
o" x
y'w
N
d� o
P £
b„ 2
Q
N n G J
cr T
t Xii
y A u Y
m N c 6 n C M 6 4 0 0 c n n O D
a
mgr _ d
R
N°
d =
y N a N
.•-t O m _ 'o � N � A �
IT
w Y H C T
•� `^ � S NNNN W N 0 N N N� '�" M O FD Q. E w � 0
o c c « o m = E a
mH w d E
_ w �
m o
w o
u"P ° °o uoi 8£ S C a v' v ui a
' C 6 `Y Q'S b 9 C N a O °yy 4 y Y D« m m o• V £ u0i 6 a0
mo a ego 9 Y � m
M 2„
m 4 C O 4 S p A C
m
e 3 H M1 $ ' n ry n`�^. ` w C %n N I C O ge c w u y o
�{
m
VF N U p pp a F �' p � p� 2
~im o N f a €x goo�d =` E � sf I t
J2 3
w f Y .S-°' ; R : pp m f -'' Y i $' • 2 � N � m c � .c° d u° v° u U° c Y s
3,:
Z
r�
C y
ci .o v v
m 2<11
fo �
a a a a i s n
Ng
°e o
n
a�N
L
E Y O O
a �
� o ~
x O O
10
o�NQ
m r
M�
r'{
u
6 �
r O
x p H
N N
O
O
c E H o Nry �a .n
s g o
H EEDD m [�• d
{ O O Y
4 � �• 1+0,Q+ �� .N C
V
S p NpN
�05 L H
S e r s A c R a
_ L,. A
y s x
a3an
E N r9E < «� ° mss
fLi .tt a r r 5 3 � y w
Vi m
•R d m o �.. u
$s 4 A
•3 o w Q N E � L _ _ v
M "
S c a$ E a 3 c'
s'o E g n n H •°- s° '�° A ° r v
`
MrSoj
ol
2`o�•m
�•a
T ✓ p Y �•U �`O a 6 a � 9 9 L w Y