The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution 2010-074 RESOLUTION NO 2010-074 amw RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2010-0006 PREPARED FOR THE 2010 DRAFT BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (City of Atascadero) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, California, directed staff to develop a Bicycle Transportation Plan to be implemented Citywide, and, WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2010-0006 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and, WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing on October 21, 2010 following the close of the review period to consider the Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, and, WHEREAS, the Parks and recreation Commission has determined that the proposed Bicycle Transportation Plan will have no significant impacts with project specific mitigation measures incorporated, and, rrrr WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing on November 23, 2010, following the close of the review period, to consider the Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, and, NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, hereby resolves to certify Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2010-0006 based on the following Findings, and as shown in Exhibit A. 1 The Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA, and, 2. The Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission, and the information contained therein was considered by the Parks and Recreation Commission, prior to recommending action on the project for which it was prepared, and, 3 The proposed Bicycle Transportation Plan does not have the potential to degrade the environment when mitigation measures are incorporated into the project, and, 4 The proposed Bicycle Transportation Plan will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, and, am City of Atascadero Resolution No. 2010-074 Page 2 of 3 5 The proposed Bicycle Transportation Plan does not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable, and, 6 The proposed Bicycle Transportation Plan will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly On motion by Council Member Beraud and seconded by Council Member Clay, the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote AYES Council Members Beraud, Clay, Kelley and Mayor Fonzi NOES None ABSENT Council Member O'Malley ADOPTED November 23, 2010 CITY OF ATASCADERO By, Roberta Fonzi, Mayor ATTEST � 1 Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.0 , VitRIerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. f I&- Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney Yl.r City of Atascadero Resolution No. 2010-074 Page 3 of 3 Exhibit A; Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2010-0006 ilr Due to the size of Exhibit A,it is not attached to the Resolution. However, it may be viewed in its entirety in the Office of the City Clerk Or am Exhibit A: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2010-0006 RESO No. 20010-074 Exhibit A CITY OF ATASCADERO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ADOPT PROPOSED INUTIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Environmental Coordinator of the City of Atascadero has completed a review of the following project and is proposing the following environmental determination: Owner/Applicant: City ofAtascadero, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 Project Title: PLN -2010-1374, Atascadero Bicyc le Transportation Plan Project Location: Citywide Project The City of Atascadero's Bicycle Transportation Plan is a planning document which Description: provides a blueprint for the development of a comprehensive bicycling system throughout the City. The plan is designed to facilitate safe, comfortable, convenient, and enjoyable bicycle transportation by all cyclists. The plan proposes both physical projects, such as new bike lanes, striping, and sigaage, as well as policies to encourage growth of the City's bikeway network The General Plan Circulation Diagram and the General Plan Circulation Element Goals, Policies, and Programs have been used as guides in the development of the 2010 Bicycle Transportation Plan for consistency in order to ensure consistency with the 2002 adopted General Plan. With the adoption of the Bicycle Transportation Platy, the City will be eligible for various Federal, State and County grants in connection with projects that promote bicycling. The proposed plan contains specific information required by Section 891.2 of the California Streets and Highttays Code and addresses all of the requirements needed to be eligible for State grants under the Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) program. Environmental Begins: September 22, 2010 Review Dates: Ends: October 21, 2010 Informational September 28, 2010: DraftRexiew and Comment (Joint City Council /Commission meeting) Meeting: Tentative October 21, 2010: Parks and Recreation Commission, 7:00 p.m. Hearing Dates: November 23, 2010: City Council, 6:00 p.m. Hearing City Hall Council Chambers Location: 6907 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 Proposed Based on the Initial Study prepared for the project, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed. Environmental The Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for public review from 9122/10 through I OLI1!10 at Determination: 6907 El Camino Real, Community Development Department from 8:30 a.m. to 5.00 pm. Monday through Friday. Arty interested person stay review the proposed,Witigated Negative Declaration and project files Questions should be directed to Callie Taylor, Associate Planner at 470-3445. Warren Frace, Comtmmity Development Director Date Fi.:Hh+Tmli}¢may T.ietD 1P1y1C8:1aA1f 6907 EL CAMLNO REAL • ATASCADERO, CA 93422 • (805) 461-5000 • EAX 461-7612 nirt!41�nn it �RCAI►iT�' CITY OFATASCADERO NOTICE OF DETERMINATION 6907 El Camino Real Atascadero, CA 93422 805.161.5000 To: ® CountyClerl-,CowtyofSanLuis Obispo From: Q'aaenFrace, City ofAtascadero subject: Filing of.Notice of Determination in Compliance with Section 2115: of the Public Resources Code Owner/Applicant; City ofAtascadero, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 Project Title: PLN -2010-1374, Atascadero Bicycle Transportation Plan Project Location: Cit}wide Project The City ofAtascadero's Bicycle Transportation Plan is a planning document which Description: provides a blueprint for the development of a comprehensive bicycling system throughout the City. The plan is designed to facilitate safe, comfortable, convenient, and enjoyable bicycle transportation by all cyclists_ The plan proposes both physical projects, such as new bike lanes, striping, and signage, as well as policies to encourage growth of the City's bike, ay network. The General Plan Circulation Diagram and the General Plan Circulation Element Goals, Policies, and Programs have been used as guides in the development of the 2010 Bicycle Transportation Plan for consistency in order to ensure consistency with the 2002 adopted General Plan. With the adoption of the Bicycle Transportation Plan, the City -will be eligible for various Federal, State and County grants in connection with projects that promote bicycling. The proposed plan contains specific information required by Section 891.2 of the California Streets and Highways Code and addresses all of the requirements needed to be eligible for State grants tinder the Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) program. STATE CLEARINGHOUSE M. — This is to certify that the City of Amscadero, the ® leadla ❑ responsible agency approved die above-described project on November 23, 2010 and made the follotsing determinations: 1. The project ❑ will N gill not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. ❑ An Environmental Impact Report was prepared and certified for this project pursuant to the promsions of CEQA and reflects the independent judgment of the Lead Agency. ❑ A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and reflects the independent judgment of the Lead Agency. ® A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and reflects the independent judgment of the Lead Agency. 3. Mitigation measures ®v ere ❑ were not made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A Statement of Overriding Considerations E] was ® was not adopted for this project. 5. Findings ® were ❑ were not made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA 6. The location and custodian of the documents which comprise the record of proceedings for the Final EIR (Hith comments and responses) or Mitigated Negative Declaration are specified as follows: Custodian: IParren Frace, Community Development Director Location: Cortintnrtin,DevelopntentDeparnnent, 6907E1 Cmnhio Real, Atascadero, C4 93422 Warren Frace, Community Development Director Date hY.HavPmn\0'.� t.J.ds P.rJD—W1Y10t;70AH 6907 EL C,,LNIPi'O REAL • ATASCADERO, CA 93422 • (805) 461-5000 • F_AX 461-7612 r.k rrin io CAU ; CITY OFATASCADERO PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION #2010-0006 6907 El Camino Real Atascadero, CA 93422 805/461-5000 Owner/Applicant: City ofAtascadero, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 Project Title: PLN -2010-1374, Atascadero Bicycle Transportation Plan Project Location: CitYuddc Project The City of Atascadero's Bicycle Transportation Plan is a planning document winich Description: provides a blueprintfor the development of a comprehensive bicycling system throughout the City. The plan is designed to facilitate safe, comfortable, convenient, and enjoyable bicycle transportation by all cyclists. The plan proposes both physical projects, such as new bike lanes, striping, and signage, as well as policies to encourage growth of the City's bikeway network The General Plan Circulation Diagram and the General Plan Circulation Element Goals, Policies, and Programs have been used as guides in the development of the 2010 Bicycle Transportation Phan for consistency in order to ensure consistency Wath the 2002 adopted General Plan. With the adoption of the Bicycle Transportation Plan, the City will be eligible for various Federal, State and County grants in connection with projects that promote bicycling. The proposed plan contains specific information required by Section 891.2 of the California Streets and Highways Code and addresses all of the requirements needed to be eligible for State grants tinder the Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) program Findings: 1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment. 2. The project will not achieve short -tern to the disadvantage of long-tenn environmental goals. 3_ The project does not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. 4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. Determination: Based on the above findings, and the information contained in the Initial Study 2010-0006 (made a part hereof by reference and on file in the Community Development Department), it has been determined that the above project will not have anadverse impact on the enviromnent when the folloAing mitigation measures are incorporated into the project (see attachment)_ Prepared By: Date Posted: Public Review Ends: Attachments: Callie Taylor, Associate Planner XatrLeuis, Planning Intern September 22, 2010 October 21, 2010 - Initial Study 2010-0006 - Draft Bicycle Transportation Plan NU: >il.F—MMA. Wit—iauacea+.w 6907 EL CADII1'O REAL • ATASCADERO, C.A. 93422 • (807 461-5000 • FAX 461-7612 CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Environmental Review 2010-0006 Owner/Applicant: City of Atascadero, 6907 El Camino ReaL Atascadero, CA 93422 Project Title: PI -N-2010-1374, Atascadero Bicycle Transportation Plan Project Location: Cigmride Project The City of Atascadero's Bicycle Transportation Plan is a planning document which Description: provides a blueprint for the development of a comprehensive bicycling system throughout Designation: the City. The plan is designed to facilitate safe, comfortable, convenient, and enjoyable Zoning: bicycle transportation by all cyclists. The plan proposes both physical projects, such as new Surrounding Land bike lanes, striping, and signage, as well as policies to encourage growth of the City's Uses and Setting: bikeway netwrork. The General Plan Circulation Diagram and the General Plan Circulation Other public Element Goals, Policies, and Programs have been used as guides in the development of the agencies whose 2010 Bicycle Transportation Plan for consistency in order to ensure consistency with the approval is 2002 adopted General Plan. required (e.g., permits, With the adoption of the Bicycle Transportation Plan, the City will be eligible for Carious financing approval, or Federal- State and County grits in connection with projects that promote bicycling. The participation agreement) proposed plan contains specific information required by Section 891-2 of the California Streets and Highways Code and addresses all of the requirements needed to be eligible for State grants under the Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) program Lead Agency Name City of Atascadero and Address: 6907 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 Contact Person and Callie Taylor, Associate Phumer Phone Number: City of Atascadero, Phone: (80.5)470-3448 General Plan Citywide Designation: Zoning: Citywide Surrounding Land N/A Uses and Setting: Other public - San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) to determine agencies whose consistency with the adopted Regional Transportation Plan (RTP); approval is - California Department of Transportation, Bicycle Unit, to detelnriue required (e.g., permits, consistency with State Code requirements and to certify the plan. financing approval, or participation agreement) 101WIG Bike Plan ISMND_dx CITY OF ATASCADERO =LAL STUDY Exhibit A Temng Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program !Monitoring Measure PLN 2010-1374 FUF;�„" 6-Grar"gF I B�.BuhlyP—a P': pt—N 5— B&Buix* smkm M: Tnry ray Daupaey FD.FRD[palM f9:Pk. O.P.V.-M Bicycle Transportation Plan FC F_rWh VM CE:C@JEIp_ FO: FhN Dcapanq %VN:%V.fW.Mr G Ciy"_7 FYNrM�Crnp. Mitigation Measure 1.b.1: Bike routes along creeks will generally follow BP BSIPS 1.b.1 the path of the creek, but will move to City streets where necessary to avoid steep slopes, heavily forested areas, sensitive habitats, or unmanageable terrain. Mitigation Measure 1.d.1- Class I bike path lighting shall comply with City BP BSIPS 1.d.1 standards. Any lighting along creeks shall be designed to shine away from the creek corridor or not be installed at locations where impacts cannot be mitigated. Mitigation Measure 3.b.1. The project shall be conditioned to comply with BP BSIPS all applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust (PM -10) as contained in sections 6.3, 6.4 and 6.5 of the April 2003 Air Quality Handbook. Section 6.3: Construction Eouioment • Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to manufacturers specifications. • Fuel all off-road and portable diesel powered equipment, including but not limited to bulldozers, graders, cranes, loaders, scrapers, backhoes, generator sets, compressors, auxiliary power units, with ARB certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (Non -taxed version suitable for use off-road). • Maximize to the extent feasible, the use of diesel construction equipment meeting the ARB's 1996 or newer certification standard for off-road heavy-duty diesel engines. Section 6.4: Activity Management Techniques • Develop a comprehensive construction activity management plan designed to minimize the amount of large construction equipment operating during any given time period. • Schedule of construction truck trips during non -peak hours to reduce peak hour emissions. • Limit the length of the construction workday period, if necessary. • Phase construction activities, if appropriate. Section 6.5: Fugitive PM10 All of the following measures shall be included on grading, demolition and building plan notes: A. Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible. B. Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site_ Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non -potable) water should be used whenever possible. C. All dirt stockpile areas should be sprayed daily as needed_ D. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project re -vegetation and landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities_ E. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with a fast- torlsrlB Bite Plan ISMND.d- CTTY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Exhibit A Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program iMonitoring Measure PLN 2010-1374 FIA Fra u„ W: 0-frg pe.4 57_SLi)wg Nnt ": "IV 5l..1— 55: Bud; 5tn1' TO: Te ;*wy C_Py .J FO: Fie OK vA — PO:Nre Department Bicycle Transportation Plan Y p FL Fivisp aw CE Cy DO— 1NYtCanreax FD: Fital Cccdparty CA:CtyAW-y AW&C:%VaWCC p. germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation is established. F. All disturbed soil areas not subject to re -vegetation should be stabilized using approved chemical soil binder, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the APCD. G. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc, to be paved should be complete as soon as possible. In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used_ H. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site. I. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114. J. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or wash off trucks and equipment leaving the site. K. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where feasible. L. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the dust control program and to order increased watering, as necessary, to prevent transport of dust off site. The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the APCD prior to land use clearance for map recordation and land use clearance for finish grading of any structure. Mitigation Measure 3.b.2: The project shall be conditioned to comply with BP BS,PS 3.b.2 all applicable APCD regulations pertaining to Naturally Occurring Asbestos. Prior to any grading activities at the site, the project proponent shall ensure that a geologic evaluation is conducted to determine if NOA is present within the area that will be disturbed. If NOA is not present, an exemption request must be filed with the District (see Attachment 1)_ If NOA is found at the site the applicant must comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM. This may include development of an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan and an Asbestos Health and Safety Program for approval by the APCD. Refer to the APCD web page at httpYA,Yww.slocleanair.org/business/asbestos.asp for more information or contact Tim Fuhs of the Enforcement Division at 781-5912. Bp PS 4.a.b.c.d. Mitigation Measure 4.a.b.c.d: Biological evaluations shall be completed for projects which may have potential impact to creeks, the Salinas River, riparian or wetland areas. Surveys for sensitive and special status plant and animal species shall be conducted on a project by project basis where necessary to avoid potential habitats. Surveys for Riparian Habitat and Special -status Plant Species shall be conducted where appropriate. The City shall work with a qualified biologist to modify projects or mitigate 10115110 Bike Plan ISMND.d- L: - CITY OFATASCADERO IIVPFIAL STLIDY Exhibit A Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program !Monitoring Measure PLN 2010-1374 FIA. Fra Vip `°'Bud's"`"" PS'. Cbm 5-- wmicn;5 ,rn 3 D? Ter' . Petrtlt iG: Tenp,!ry 0—p -i 1o:rn•0ew^ner, PD: -'k.DFW..T Bicycle Transportation Plan ru r-linve4m cechiag— ,Nv:,lasr�ar FO: Fi,]I CtawnGy 4tiCityAtbnry AM1NC: WWCnry. disturbance of any wetlands, sensitive species or habitats, riparian areas, or wildlife corridors. The City shall ensure compliance with applicable local, state and federal regulations. Proper specific CEQA documents and associated mitigations, as well as consultation with any pertinent agencies shall be undertaken for all projects that have the potential to disturb waterways or sensitive habitats. Mitigation Measure 4.e.1: Grading and excavation and grading work shall Ba PS 4.e.1 be consistent with the City of Atascadero Tree Ordinance. Special precautions when working around native trees include: 1. All existing trees outside of the limits of work shall remain. 2. Earthwork shall not exceed the limits of the project area. 3. Low branches in danger of being torn from trees shall be pruned prior to any heavy equipment work being done. 4. Vehicles and stockpiled material shall be stored outside the drip line of all trees. 5. All trees within twenty feet of construction work shall be fenced for protection with 4 -foot chain link, snow or safety fencing placed per the approved tree protection plan. Tree protection fencing shall be in place prior to any site excavation or grading. Fencing shall remain in place until completion of all construction activities. 6. Any roots that are encountered during excavation shall be clean cut by hand and sealed with an approved Vee seal. 7. Utilities such as water, gas, power, cable, storm drainage, and sewer should be redirected from under the canopy of any trees that are to remain. 8. Where a building is placed within the canopy of a tree the foundation should be redesigned so that it bridges across any root systems. 9. Any foundation or other structure that encroaches within the drip line of trees to be saved shall be dug by hand. 10. At no time shall tree roots be ripped with construction equipment. Mitigation Measure 4.e.2: Individual project site plan shall identify all I BP BS1PS 4.e.2 protection and enhancement measures recommended by the Certified Arborist in the Tree Protection Plan. Tree protection fencing shall be installed at the locations called out in the Tree Protection Pian. Mitigation Measure 4.e.3: Tree removal permits shall be obtained for any BP Bs/ps 4.e.3 native trees which need to be removed for construction of a proposed project. Tree removals shall be permitted and mitigated according to the Atascadero Native Tree ordinance. Tree mitigation fees shall be paid or trees shall be planted as mitigation per the requirements of the Atascadero Native Tree Ordinance. Mitigation Measure 4.e_4: Erosion control hydroseedlslope stabilization BP PS 4.e.4 near creeks or drainage swales shall consist of native species matching the existing plant species within the tributary stream. The seed and plant material shall not contain any introduced plant species. 10/15110 Bike Plan ISMND.d- CITY OFATASCADERO MTL L STUDY Exhibit A Timing Responsibility Mitigation Mitigation Monitoring Program !Monitoring Measure PLN 2010-1374 FMFi•,vu,p G1.c"Org;*. ` 55 WI ? serVx s aP 81i&9 Perot TO: Trryiray FO: Fie Orps .W- Bicycle Transportation Plan OuuWq F`FLU-Paam :o: Paix O.Rn-nt CECr4eq'ue FO:Fhat OCGVpirty M -3Y351 A r Cil'civ Aw-f A.%= Wim Cay. Mitigation 5.a.b.c.1: If potential cultural resources are found during Ongoing P5 5.a.b.c.1 construction, construction shall cease until a qualified archaeologist determines the extent of the resource, and the. Community Development Director approves appropriate protective measures. Mitigation 5.d.1: In the event that human remains are discovered on the Ongoing P5 s.d.t property, all work on the project shall stop and the Atascadero Police Department and the County Coroner shall be contacted. The Atascadero Community Development Department shall be notified. irthe human remains are identified as being Native American, the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be contacted at (916) 653- 4082 within 24 hours. A representative from both the Chumash Tribe and the Salinan Tribe shall be notified and present during the excavation of any remains. Mitigation Measure 6.b.1: Grading plans shall be submitted for each Bp BS/PS 6.b.1 proposed bikeway on a project by project basis. These plans shall Include erosion control measures to prevent soil, dirt, and debris from entering the storm drain system during and after construction. Separate plans shall be submitted for this purpose and shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer at the time of Building Permit application. Mitigation Measure 6.b.2: All cut and fill slopes shall be hydro seeded with BP Bsips 6.b.2 an appropriate erosion control method (erosion control blanket, hydro - mulch, or straw mulch appropriately anchored) immediately after completion of earthwork between the months of October 15 through April 15. All disturbed slopes shall have appropriate erosion control methods in place_ Duration of the project: The contractor will be responsible for the clean up of any mud or debris that is tracked onto public streets by construction vehicles. Mitigation Measure 9.e -t1: The contractor is responsible for ensuring that Bp BS.IPS 9.e.f.1 all workers are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such measures are implemented. Failure to comply with the approved construction Best Management Practices will result in the issuance of correction notices, citations, or stop orders. Mitigation Measure 12.d.1: All construction activities shall comply with the BP Bslps 12.4.1 City of Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours of operation. 10/15110 Bite Plan ISMND.d- CITY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ® Aesthetics ❑ Biological Resources ®Greenhouse Gas Emissions ® Land Use / Planning F-1 Population /Housing xTransportation/Traffic ❑Agriculture and Forest Resources ® Cultural Resources ❑Hazards & Hazardous Materials ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Public Services ❑ Utilities / Service Systems ® Air Quality ❑ Geology /Soils ®Hydrology / Water Quality ❑ Noise ❑ Recreation ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance On the basis of this initial evaluation_ ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ® I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I fund that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the enyiromnent, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required_ ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant effect" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in ail earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets_ An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Callie Taylor Associate Plamer 10115110 Bike Plan ISMND.dm EVALL?ATTON OF E1S'VIIi0Ni TENTAL LIIPACTS: CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported it the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one Involved (e -g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved. Including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational Impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the Impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there Is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact" The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from "Earlier Analyses," as described in (5) below, may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses maybe used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed In an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis, c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to Incorporate Into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement Is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. S) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. iaim70 Eike Plan ISMND_d.c ilkCITY OF ATASCADERO * � =1AL S=Y Initial Study 2010-0006 Potentially Less Than Less Than Ho Significant Significant with Significant Impact PLN 2010-1374, Bicycle Transportation Plan Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation 1. AESTHETICS —Would the project a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? L1 E El b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not El El limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings V\J within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that ® ❑ would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? SOURCES: Atascadero Bicycle Transportation Plan, Atascadero General Plan, Atascadero Municipal Code. DISCUSSION: 1.a. The proposed bikeways will not affect any scenic vista view corridors_ 1.b. The proposed bikeways will not have an affect on and historic buildings or scenic highways. Proposed bikeways are primarily designed to be located along existing or streets and highways in previously developed areas_ Bicycle transportation and facilities shall be included with new development as shown on the proposed facilities map. Bike routes along creeks will generally follow the path of the creek, but will move to City streets where necessary to avoid steep slopes, heavily forested areas, sensitive habitats, or unmanageable terrain. Most proposed bike paths are located in areas with relatively level terrain that does not include significant rock outcroppings. Bike path projects would typically be routed around any rock outcroppings, trees, or historic structures as necessary. Class I and II bikeway projects may potentially result in damage to or the removal of existing native oak trees. Any native trees which are impacted by new bike facilities will be managed and mitigated per the Native Tree Ordinance_ 1.c. Implementation of Class II bike lanes and Class III bike routes involves the installation of signs and/or pavement markings on streets. For some Class II projects, minimal street widening may also be required. Class I trails would include paving, signs and possibly bridges or other structures. These impacts shall be minimal and shall have a less than significant impact. 1.d. Class 11 bike lanes and Class III bike routes will be lit by existing street lights, and Class I bike trails typically do not include lighting. In such cases where additional lighting will be required, lighting will be consistent with the Atascadero Municipal Code and will be shielded as to not incur excessive light spill -off. Mitigation Measure. l .b.1: Bike routes along creeks will generally follow the path of the creek, but will move to City streets where necessary to avoid steep slopes, heavily forested areas, sensitive habitats, or unmanageable terrain. Mitigation Measure 1_d.1: Class I bike path lighting shall comply with City standards. Any lighting along creeks shall be designed to shine away from the creek corridor or not be installed at locations where impacts cannot be mitigated. 2. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST RESOURCES — In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of C:Oowments and Setbngslssim Ucal SeWngslTeniporary Internet FilesiContent0udcokN0ZWS20ElBike Plan ISMND.doc ' CITY OFATASCADERO ` INITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2010-0006 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact PLN 2010-1374, Bicycle Transportation Plan Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's Inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project: and the forest carbon measurement methodology provided in the Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board- Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland El F ❑ of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring air quality plan? Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? El c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, El D El Z forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined in Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))?? ® d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - land to non -forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed SOURCES: Atascadero Bicycle Transportation Plan , Land Use Element EIR DISCUSSION 2.a. There are no bike paths proposed to be located on agriculturally zoned properties. Bike paths will be implemented primarily within urban and built-up land areas. Less than significant Impacts to agricultural resources are anticipated with the Implementation of the 2010 Bicycle Transportation Pian. 2.b- No bike pathways are proposed for lands zoned for agriculture or under a Williamson Act contract. 2_c. The Bicycle Transportation Plan does not involve rezoning of forest land or timberland. Bike paths will primarily be placed within urban and built-up areas. 2.d.e. Neither forestland nor farmland will not be lost in the creation of bike pathways. 3. AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially El 0 to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net Increase of any ® ❑ criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? 10715!10 Page C:1Ooe nt% and Seaing.hv-m L ... I SeW.Ua ITemP ,y Internet Files CmienLOutiwklMOZ4YS20E1Sike Plan ISMND.d= CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2010-0006 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact PLN 2010-1374, Bicycle Transportation Plan Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number El ❑ ® ❑ of people? SOURCES: Atascadero Bicycle Transportation Plan , Air Pollution Control District (APCD) CEQA Air Quality Handbook DISCUSSION: 3.a_) The Bicycle Transportation Plan is consistent with the planning maps, policies, goals and programs of the 2002 Atascadero General Plan_ The Circulation Element of Atascadero's General Plan includes a goal to "Provide and promote alternative modes of travel to reduce traffic congestion and improve air quality by providing viable transit alternatives-" The Bike Plan has been developed in conjunction with representatives from the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) and the San Luis Obispo County Bicycle Coalition in order to ensure consistency with regional plans. The Atascadero Bike Plan is consistent with the San Luis Obispo County Bikeways Plan (2005), SLOCOG's Regional Transportation Plan (2005), and the San Luis Obispo County Clean Air Plan (2001). Implementation of the Bicycle Transportation Plan should increase bicycle ridership and therefore have a positive effect on air quality_ Increased levels of bicycling should reduce vehicle trips and miles traveled, therefore reducing emissions of pollutants. As a result, implementation of the BTP will not conflict with air quality planning. 3.b -c-) Construction activities associated with installing bike lanes and trails to implement the BTP, may include grading and paving which will generate an increase in quantities of criteria pollutants and particulate matter, including dust and equipment exhaust. Air quality impacts for the entirety of any road widening projects or projects requiring substantial grading and paving will be evaluated separately by individual environmental documents. Implementation of all bikeway projects shall be conditioned to comply with all applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust (PM -10) as contained in sections 6.3, 6.4 and 6.5 of the April 2003 Air Quality Handbook. Maintenance activities for all bikeways will include weed control, street/trail sweeping, trash collection, asphalt repair and other low -frequency maintenance activities. It is expected that the benefits of increased bicycle transportation will outweigh the potential impact of infrequent maintenance activities_ The impact is less than significant_ 3.d.) The construction of bikeway projects would result in brief periods of elevated pollutant concentrations, due to paving and construction equipment_ The pollutant concentrations are expected to dissipate before they cause adverse effects to sensitive populations_ In addition, all projects should be brief enough to not affect one particular population for a long enough time to have any notable effect. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant. 3.e.) Normal use of bikeways would not create any odors, but construction and maintenance of bikeways could generate temporary odors_ The impacts would be less that significant Mitigation Measure 3.b.1: The project shall be conditioned to comply with all applicable District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust (PM -10) as contained in sections 6.3, 6.4 and 6.5 of the April 2003 Air Quality Handbook. Section 6.3= Construction Equipment Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to manufacturer's specifications. Fuel all off-road and portable diesel powered equipment, including but not limited to bulldozers, graders, cranes, loaders, scrapers, backhoes, generator sets, compressors, auxiliary power units, with ARB certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (Non -taxed version suitable for use off-road). Maximize to the extent feasible, the use of diesel construction equipment meeting the ARB's 1996 or newer certification standard for off-road heavy-duty diesel engines. Section 6 47 Activity Management Techniques + Develop a comprehensive construction activity management plan designed to minimize the amount of large construction equipment operating during any given time period- + Schedule of construction truck trips during non -peak hours to reduce peak hour emissions- . Limit the length of the construction workday period, if necessary. + Phase construction activities, if appropriate. MUM Page 10 C:1Doamrents and Se"slssim local SeaingsWernporary Intemet FileslContenLOutlookVAOZWS29E49te Plan ISUNDAm ' C= OFATASCADERO INITIAL STCIDY Initial Study 2010-0006 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact PLN 2010-1374, Bicycle Transportation Plan Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Section 6.5: Fugitive PM10 All of the following measures shall be included on grading, demolition and building plan notes: A. Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible. B. Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems In sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non - potable) water should be used whenever possible. C. All dirt stockpile areas should be sprayed daily as needed. D. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project re -vegetation and landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. E. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with a fast -germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation is established. F. All disturbed soil areas not subject to re -vegetation should be stabilized using approved chemical soil binder, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the APCD. G. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc, to be paved should be complete as soon as possible_ In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. H. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site. I. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114. J. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto streets, or wash off trucks and equipment leaving the site. K. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers with reclaimed water should be used where feasible_ L. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons to monitor the dust control program and to order increased watering, as necessary, to prevent transport of dust off site. The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the APCD prior to land use clearance for map recordation and land use clearance for finish grading of any structure. Mitigation Measure 3b.2: The project shall be conditioned to complywith all applicable APCD regulations pertaining to Naturally Occurring Asbestos. Prior to any grading activities at the site, the project proponent shall ensure that a geologic evaluation is conducted to determine if NOA is present within the area that will be disturbed. If NOA is not present, an exemption request must be filed with the District (see Attachment 1). If NOA is found at the site the applicant must comply with all requirements outlined in the Asbestos ATCM. This may include development of an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Plan and an Asbestos Health and Safety Program for approval by the APCD_ Refer to the APCD web page at http:/Avtvw.slocleanair.org/business✓asbestos.asp for more information or contact Tim Fuhs of the Enforcement Division at 781-5912. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ® ❑ through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat ® ❑ or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? 10!1&10 Page 11 C:1Doeum nts and Settingsisshmkf-ocal SefanaskTemporary Internet FileaZonientOudookWOZwS20EISIke Plan ISMND_doc ' CPIY OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2010-0006 Potentially LesaThan Leas Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact PLN 2010-1374, Bicycle Transportation Plan impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting D El biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? SOURCES: Atascadero Bicycle transportation Plan, Land Use Element EIR, Atascadero Tree Ordinance DISCUSSION. 4.a. Some proposed projects in the BTP may be located in areas that support special -status plant or animal species. Construction of bikeways along Atascadero Creek and the Salinas River may adversely impact, either directly or indirectly through habitat modifications, some plants and animal species. The City would attempt to avoid Impacts to sensitive species whenever possible by rerouting bike paths or utilizing a qualified biologist to assess potential impacts and incorporate mitigation on a project by project basis. Any new bike routes or facilities shall comply With applicable local, state and federal regulations regarding sensitive or special status species In order to reduce potential impact to a less than significant level. 4.b. Riparian habitat occurs along the banks of Atascadero Creek and Salinas River_ Bikeways are proposed to travel along these waterways, and therefore have the potential to impact riparian habitat. The level of impact for specific bikeway projects is not know at this time, and would depend on extent of disturbance and actual habitat loss. Mitigation will be required to reduce the impact to less than significant through biologist evaluation on a project specific basis. 4.c. According the General Plan EIR, the extent of wetlands within buildable Atascadero is not fully documented. Images from the National Wetlands Survey signify the existence of a minimal amount of wetlands area. Bikeways my possibly Intrude on these wetlands. The City will design bikeways to avoid impacts to wetlands where feasible, and will implement mitigation measures to reduce the impact to less than significant through biologist evaluation on a project specific basis. 4.d. Some proposed bike paths would be located in open space corridors along Atascadero Creek and Salinas River. These areas serve as habitat for migratory animal species, including fish and birds. The proposed bikeways would not substantially alter the continuity of habitat corridors, although construction activities may temporarily interfere with the movement animals. Mitigation measures will be Implemented to reduce the Impact to less than significant through biologist monitoring and pre -construction surveys. 4e -f- The General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element includes policies related to biological issues. These policies are generally related to the preservation and rehabilitation of riparian corridors and native oak woodlands. The General Plan notes that Class I bike trails are permitted within open space areas. Any new bikeways near creeks or wetlands shall be designed to minimize Impacts per the General Plan. The City Native Tree Ordinance contains standards for the protection of native oak trees, as well as mitigation for native tree removals. The provisions of the Native Tree Ordinance would be applied to any bicycle projects that may impact 10115,10 Page 12 C:100ooments and Scnings ssims Low1 Setdnp Temp.—y Intemet FileslConteniOutloakWOZWS20E4Eike Plan ISMND.doe CITY OF ATASCADF-RO BgIML SMDY Initial Study 2010-0006 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significantwith Significant Impact PLN 2010-1374, Bicycle Transportation Plan Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation a native tree, such as requiring arborist reports, protective fencing, payment to the tree fund, etc Implementation of the City's Native Tree Ordinance would reduce the impact to less than significant level. Mitigation Measure 4.a.b.c.d: Biological evaluations shall be completed for projects which may have potential impact to creeks, the Salinas River, riparian or wetland areas. Surveys for sensitive and special status plant and animal species shall be conducted on a project by project basis where necessary to avoid potential habitats. Surveys for Riparian Habitat and Special -status Plant Species shall be conducted where appropriate. The City shall work with a qualified biologist to modify projects or mitigate disturbance of any wetlands, sensitive species or habitats, riparian areas, or wildlife corridors. The City shall ensure compliance with applicable local, state and federal regulations. Proper specific CEOA documents and associated mitigations, as well as consultation with any pertinent agencies shall be undertaken for all projects that have the potential to disturb waterways or sensitive habitats. Mitigation Measure 4.e.1: Grading and excavation and grading work shall be consistent with the City of Atascadero Tree Ordinance. Special precautions when working around native trees include: 11. All existing trees outside of the limits of work shall remain. 12. Earthwork shall not exceed the limits of the project area_ 13. Low branches in danger of being tom from trees shall be pruned prior to any heavy equipment work being done - 14 -Vehicles and stockpiled material shall be stored outside the drip line of all trees. 15.AII trees within twenty feet of construction work shall be fenced for protection with 4 -foot chain link, snow or safety fencing placed per the approved tree protection plan. Tree protection fencing shall be in place prior to any site excavation or grading. Fencing shall remain in place until completion of all construction activities. 16.Any roots that are encountered during excavation shall be clean cut by hand and sealed with an approved tree seal. 17. Utilities such as water, gas, power, cable, storm drainage, and sewer should be redirected from under the canopy of any trees that are to remain. 18. Where a building is placed within the canopy of a tree the foundation should be redesigned so that it bridges across any root systems. 19.Any foundation or other structure that encroaches within the drip line of trees to be saved shall be dug by hand - 20 -At no time shall Vee roots be ripped with construction equipment. Mitigation Measure 4.e.2: Individual project site plan shall identify all protection and enhancement measures recommended by the Certified Arborist in the Tree Protection Plan. Tree protection fencing shall be installed at the locations called out in the Tree Protection Plan. Mitigation Measure 4.e.3: Tree removal permits shall be obtained for any native trees which need to be removed for construction of a proposed project Tree removals shall be permitted and mitigated according to the Atascadero Native Tree ordinance. Tree mitigation fees shall be paid or trees shall be planted as mitigation per the requirements of the Atascadero Native Tree Ordinance. Mitigation Measure 4.e.4: Erosion control hydroseed/slope stabilization near creeks or drainage swales shall consist of native species matching the existing plant species within the tributary stream. The seed and plant material shall not contain any introduced plant species_ 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project. a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of ❑ a historical resource as defined In '15064-5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change In the significance of ® Elan archaeological resource pursuant to '15064.5? El El c) Directly or Indirectly destroy a unique paleontological 7 El ® ❑ 101an0 Page "13 C:1Doaments and SettirrgsksimslLecal SettlnpslTemQorary Intemet FileslCo tentOudl klMOZwS29eBike Plan ISMND.da = CITY OFATASCADERO INPITt1L ST TIDY Initial Study 2010-0006 Potentially Less Than Less Than Wo Significant Significant with Significant Impact PLN 2010-1374, Bicycle Transportation Plan Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation resource or site or unique aeoloalc feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? SOURCES: Atascadero Bicycle Transportation Plan; Land Use Element EIR: U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards. DISCUSSION: Most bike routes and lanes will be implemented along existing roadways. However, some projects will involve road widening, or creation of new, separate bike paths. Earthwork activities associated with new bikeway projects may lead to the discovery of unknown archaeological resources, in which case any required cultural resources investigation would be performed. Most bikeway projects will be implemented along existing developed roads where the likelihood of finding cultural resources is very low. Mitigation 5.a.b-c. is If potential cultural resources are found during construction, construction shall cease until a qualified archaeologist determines the extent of the resource, and the Community Development Director approves appropriate protective measures. Mitigation 5.d.1: In the event that human remains are discovered on the property, all work on the project shall stop and the Atascadero Police Department and the County Coroner shall be contacted. The Atascadero Community Development Department shall be notified. If the human remains are identified as being Native American, the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be contacted at (916) 653-4082 within 24 hours_ A representative from both the Chumash Tribe and the Salinan Tribe shall be notified and present during the excavation of any remains. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS —Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: I) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated 171 on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist forthe area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. III Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ❑ Iii) Seismic -related ground failure, Including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ❑ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ® El ❑ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? torlaao Page 14 C:IDnts and Settirpslssi-1l Sen npslTenpo ary InMmet Files)ContentOutleokWOZSVS2BE4Bike Plan ISMND.doc ' C17Y OFATASCADERO LNUL L S=Y Initial Study 2010-0006 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact PLN 2010-1374, Bicycle Transportation Plan Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B El of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of 171 VIIJ septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? SOURCES: Atascadero Bicycle Transportation; Land Use Element EIR DISCUSSION: 6.a. Atascadero lies about 30 miles west of the San Andreas Fault zone and 19 miles east of the San Simeon-Hosgri Fault. Small to moderate earthquakes are common in San Luis Obispo County_ Bikeway projects will inevitably be placed in areas at risk from earthquakes and ground shaking. Risk from these natural occurrences will not be affected or increased due to bikeway projects, and therefore, there is no impact. 6.b. Loss of topsoil may occur in the creation of new bike paths, particularty along Atascadero Creek and the Salinas River. Construction activities on each particular project site will be required to comply with sedimentation and erosion control measures prescribed by the City Engineer. The impact will be less than significant with mitigation. 6.c.d.e Soil conditions at specific bikeway project sites will be reviewed during building permit review In accordance with the municipal code. Mitigation Measure 6.b.1: Grading plans shall be submitted for each proposed bikeway on a project by project basis. These plans shall include erosion control measures to prevent soil, dirt, and debris from entering the storm drain system during and after construction. Separate plans shall be submitted for this purpose and shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer at the time of Building Permit application. Mitigation Measure 6.b.2: All cut and fill slopes shall be hydro seeded with an appropriate erosion control method (erosion control blanket, hydro -mulch, or straw mulch appropriately anchored) Immediately after completion of earthwork between the months of October 15 through April 15_ All disturbed slopes shall have appropriate erosion control methods in place. Duration of the project: The contractor will be responsible for the clean up of any mud or debris that is tracked onto public streets by construction vehicles. 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS — Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ® Elindirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of ❑ an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? SOURCES: Atascadero Bicycle Transportation Plan; General Plan; Land Use Element EIR DISCUSSION: 7_a.b. The proposed BTP would include minimal sources of greenhouse gas emissions, primarily during construction. However, as a alternative transportation project, the BTP would be beneficial in temis of minimizing greenhouse gas emissions. Increased bicycle ridership should in turn decrease vehicle trips, and contribute to lower green house emissions over time. S. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS --Would the project: IDl15110 Page 15 C:1Docuttxnts and Stnbngs\ssim%acal SeningsUenvormy Internet FileslConlentOuacokfMOZWS?gESike Plan ISMND.d- CITY OF ATASCADERO VVTTTAL STUDY Initial Study 2010-0006 Potentially Less Than Less Than 110 Significant Significantwith Significant Impact PLN 2010-1374, Bicycle Transportation Plan Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal ❑ Elof hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ®Elenvironment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- ❑ ❑ ® ❑ quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ❑ hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would It create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan area or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people living or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people living or working In the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically Interfere with an ❑ ❑ ® ❑ adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? SOURCES: Atascadero Bicycle Transportation Plan; General Plan Land Use Element DISCUSSION 8a.b.c. During the construction of bike trails and lanes, hazardous materials such as gasoline, diesel fuel, asphalt and other petroleum products may be used. Some proposed bikeway projects will be within /.-mile of a school, but the construction of bikeways does not pose an undue risk to students. Contractors would be required to comply with applicable federal, state and local regulations for handling hazardous material, reducing this impact to a less than significant level. 8d. There are three properties within the City of Atascadero that are. No bikeway projects are proposed on sites identified as hazardous materials sites; therefore, there Is no impact. Be.f.) There are no airports within Atascadero, nor are there airport land use plans that affect the City. 8.g. Bikeway construction may involve temporary closure of traffic lanes, which will need to be approved by the Public Works Department as specific projects are permitted. The impact is less than significant. 8.h. All proposed bike paths are within Fire Department 5 minute or less response area. S. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -- Would the project: 10115110 Page '16 C:11locutrcnts and SeCinyskstms%awl SeainpslTem{wrary Internet Fil"IContentOu9-ktih40ZWS29ETike Plan ISMNDdoc CITY OFATASCADERO - INITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2010-0006 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significantwith Significant Impact PLN 2010-1374, Bicycle Transportation Plan Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ❑ ❑ ❑ requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ❑ ❑ ❑ substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of ❑ ❑ ® ❑ previously -existing nearby wells would drop to a level that would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site ❑ ❑ ® ❑ or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? ❑ ❑ ❑ d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site ❑ ❑ ❑ or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ capacity or existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as ❑ ❑ ❑ mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures that ❑ ❑ ❑ would impede or redirect flood flows? 1) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ❑ ❑ ® El or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ ❑ ❑ SOURCES: Atascadero Bicycle Transportation Plan, General Plan DISCUSSION: 9a. The construction of bike paths will not violate water quality standards. 9b. The bikeway projects will not deplete ground water supplies. Water will be provided by Atascadero Mutual Water Company to any future facilities. 9c.d.e.f. Some proposed bike paths would be paved with asphalt, which will minimally increase impervious surface. However, unlike roadways traveled by motor vehicles, the quality of runoff water should not be significantly contaminated. Construction activities associated with new bike paths are subject to review for compliance with City drainage and grading regulations. Drainage will not be permitted to create or intensify any hazards for persons or property in the vicinity. The impact will be less than significant. 9.g.h.i.j. No housing is proposed. Some bikeways will be located within the 100 year flood hazard area, but personal risk should not be increased. No permanent structures shall be lotted within the flood zone. The project area is not subject to innundation by a tsunami. 10135110 Page 17 C:1 -rits and Set;inyalssimsSLocal SettinpsSTem{wnty Internet Files1Content0utlookW0ZWSN0Sike Plan ISMND.doc CITY OFATASCADERO =L4L SnIDY Initial Study 2010-0006 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant significant with significant Impact PLN 2010-1374, Bicycle Transportation Plan Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation Mitigation Measure 9.e.f.1: The developer is responsible for ensuring that all contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and that such measures are implemented. Failure to comply with the approved construction Best Management Practices will result in the Issuance of correction notices, citations, or stop orders. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ❑ regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ SOURCES: Atascadero Bicycle Transportation Plan, Land Use Element; Circulation Element; DISCUSSION: 10.a. The project will not physically divide an established community. Rather, It will better connect the City as a whole and provide for alternative transportation and recreation potential throughout the City. 10.b. The General Plan identifies key two policies in its Circulation Element calling for implementation of bikeways: CIR 2.1: Provide for a comprehensive system of creekside trails, roadside pathways, equestrian trails, multi -use trails and bikeways to connect neighborhoods, schools, commercial, and recreation areas, In accordance with the Bikeway and Trail Plan. CIR 2.2: Accommodate bicycles at major destinations including downtown, bus stops, schools, and other public facilities. The BTP fulfills these key policies and is consistent with the Bikeway and Trail Diagram which was adopted in the 2002 General Plan. 10.c. The project is consistent with the open space and conservation policies identified in the General Plan. Biological impacts shall be evaluated on a project by project basis. Bikeways shall be rerouted to avoid sensitive terrain or habitats. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result In the loss of availability of a locally -important ❑ ❑ Elmineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? SOURCES: Project description; Planning staff site visit. DISCUSSION: 11.a.b. No mining is proposed as a part of this the BTP. There are no known significant mineral resources in Atascadero_ 12. NOISE — Would the project result in: 1011511D Page 18 C:Oocu n is and Settinpsls%-ms Local SeuingslT—porary Internet FiksSContent.OuticoklMOZWSZ9E1Sike Plan ISMND.doc '-'NEW,: �' �' CTIi'OFATASCADERO .yt , B%UTIAL ST 1DY Initial Study 2010-0006 Potentially Less Than Less Than No ground -borne vibration or ground -borne noise levels? Significant Significant with Significant Impact PLN 2010-1374, Bicycle Transportation Plan Impact Mitigation Impact ❑ in the project vicinity above levels existing without the Incorporation a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels inI01 PYfPCC of ctanriarrlc Pctahlmhpri in the Inial non—ni nian nr til noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ❑ ❑ ❑ ground -borne vibration or ground -borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels ❑ ❑ in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient ® ❑ ❑ noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would ❑ ❑ the project expose people living or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? SOURCES: Atascadero Bicycle Transportation Plan; Noise Element; Noise Ordinance; Acoustical Design Manual DISCUSSION: 12a.b.c.d.) Construction is of bikeways is expected to involve some heavy machinery and use of impact tools that make noise. Noise levels at various construction sites are thus expected to be raised temporarily. All construction activities shall comply with the City of Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours of operation. The use of the bikeways will incrementally increase generation of noise, particularly at proposed bikeways adjacent to Atascadero Creek and Salinas River. The impact is less than significant. 12.e.f.) No proposed bikeways are located within an airport land use plan or private airstrip. Mitigation Measure 12.d. 1: All construction activities shall comply with the City of Atascadero Noise Ordinance for hours of operation. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING -• Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth In an area, either El El ❑ directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ❑ ❑ ❑ necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the El ❑ ❑ construction of replacement housing elsewhere? SOURCES: Atascadero Bicycle Transportation Plan; General Plan Land Use Element. DISCUSSION: 13.a.b.c.) The proposed bikeways in the BTP will facilitate non -vehicular access to and from existing developed ian5iia Page 19 c:toac— nh and SettinpAsstms{Loeol SetanasUeoparary Intemet PilesiContentOuticokttdOZwS2PEtSike Plan ISMNDAda AA �; CITY OF ATASCADERO IATHML STUDY Initial Study 2010-0006 Potentially Leas Than Leas Than No Significant Significantwilh Significant Impact PLN 2010-1374, Bicycle Transportation Plan Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation areas within the City_ Implementation of the BTP will neither directly nor indirectly create population growth_ No nuusulg ui persons will oe alsplacea. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES — Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ Police protection? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Schools?❑ El 171 Parks? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑ SOURCES: Atascadero Bicycle Transportation Plan; Land Use Element EIR DISCUSSION: New bicycle pathways as proposed by the BTP will incrementally increase the demand for maintenance services as well as patrol by City Police. The impact is less than significant. 15. RECREATION — a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational ❑ ❑ ❑171 facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require El ❑ ® ❑ the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? SOURCES: Parks and Recreation Element. DISCUSSION: 15.a.b.) Non -motorized access to recreational facilities and parks will increase due to the BTP. Bicyclists are expected to use existing facilities, but the numbers are not expected to result in substantial physical deterioration of any facilities or require construction of additional recreational facilities. Implementation of the Bicycle Transportation Plan will have a positive effect on recreational opportunities within Atascadero. 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC --Would the project_ a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ❑ ❑ ® ❑ establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of 10115110 Page 20 CADowments and SetGngslss %n Loaal SettingslTenporary Inlemet Fi1esZm!enL0ullooklM0ZWS2QE%Bike Plan ISRIND.doe C= OF ATASCADERO INITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2010-0006 Potentially Less Than Less Than NO Significant Significant with Significant Impact PLN 2010-1374, Bicycle Transportation Plan Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation transportation includinq mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, Including but not limited to Intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ❑ ❑ ❑ program, Including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, Including either ❑ ❑ ❑ an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ❑ ❑ ❑ (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e} Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs F-1 ❑ El public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? SOURCES: Atascadero Bicycle Transportation Plan, Land Use Element; Circulation Element; DISCUSSION: 16a.b. The BTP increases availability of traffic modes and alternative transportation access to the City. Construction of bikeways may temporarily hinder traffic, but the implemented BTP will improve traffic patterns- The plan is consistent will the Circulation Element of the General Plan, and has a less than significant impacL 16.c. The BTP will not affect air traffic patterns. There is no impact_ 16_d. Bikeway projects proposed by the BTP will be designed and constructed in accordance with all applicable safety standards, including minimum width, clearance to obstructions, sight distance and lighting_ The Impact is less than significant 16_e. The Construction of bikeway projects may temporarily obstruct emergency response, but use of implemented bicycle lanes will not affect and may benefit emergency response_ The impact is less than significant 161 The BTP is consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan. Implementation of the plan will encourage the use of bicycles and provide long-term beneficial Impacts to alternative transportation and Atascadero's circulation as a whole. The proposed bikeways should have an overall positive impact on transportation and circulation by incrementally reducing the dependence of private vehicles. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS --Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ❑ ❑ applicable Regional Water quality Control Board? b) Require or result In the construction of new water or ❑ wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water 10115710 Page 21 C:Mocuments and Setingstssirrail.—I SeMnpsl7enmrary Internet FileslConten�Ou:IcokUAOZwS2PEl8ike Plan ISMND.doc 9: ':x = CITY OF ATASCADERO `�i3 ✓ ItVITIAL STUDY Initial Study 2010-0006 Potentially Less Than Lena Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact PLN 2010-1374, Bicycle Transportation Plan Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of whirh rnuid rause sinnifirant envirnnrnontal ❑ I01 ill effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ❑ El Elproject from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment El ❑ provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to ❑171 accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and ❑ regulations related to solid waste? SOURCES: Atascadero Bicycle Transportation Plan; Land Use Element EIR DISCUSSION: Water The Atascadero Mutual Water Company (AMWC) will provide water to all bikeway projects as necessary. All property within the City limits is entitled to water from the AMWC. The bikeway projects are not expected to require significant quantities of water. Water is pumped from two portions of the largest underground basin In the county, the Paso Robles Formation, using a series of shallow and deep wells. The water company anticipates that it will be able to meet the city's needs through buildout and beyond: Water demand at buildout under the LUE is estimated at about 8,500 acre-feet per year (AFY). The total available groundwater supply greatly exceeds demand, according to the findings of the Long -Term viability of Water study. However, the water company does not currently have the deep wells needed to tap Into the total amount needed at buildout. The water company Is currently developing plans for installing wells where they will be most effective and will not conflict with water rights of others_ According to the Water Company, development of additional wells is expected to keep pace with construction In the city, so that water supply will not be interrupted. storm water. The impervious surfaces will result from new bike trails and lanes, which will incrementally increase the amount of water entering the City s creek system. The amount of introduced impervious surfaces is not expected to result in the need for modifications to any major drainage facilities. The potential impact is less than significant. 18, MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE -- a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate Important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ❑ limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a tonena Page 22 CADamr nts and seeinpIssimsU. 1 Seltines\Tempora tntemet FileslContentOutlookVdOZWS2BE1Site Plan ISMND.dw CITY OFATASCADERO INITIAL STLZDY Initial Study 2010-0006 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant with Significant Impact PLN 2010-1374, Bicycle Transportation Plan Impact Mitigation Impact incorporation project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will ❑ ❑ Elcause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either len�l directly or indirectly? d) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term ❑ ❑ ❑ environmental goals to the disadvantage of long term environmental goals? DISCUSSION: The City of Atascadero's Bicycle Transportation Plan is a planning document which provides a blueprint for the development of a comprehensive bicycling system throughout the City. The plan is designed to facilitate safe, comfortable, convenient, and enjoyable bicycle transportation by all cyclists while increasing the use of alternative transportation. The plan proposes both physical projects, such as new bike lanes, striping, and signage, as well as policies to encourage growth of the City's bikeway network. The General Plan Circulation Diagram and the General Plan Circulation Element Goals, Policies, and Programs have been used as guides in the development of the 2010 Bicycle Transportation Plan for consistency in order to ensure consistency with the 2002 adopted General Plan_ The plan is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The proposed plan has been analyzed as required by CEQA and the Atascadero Municipal Code. Project -related impacts have been identified and mitigation measures have been included within the proposal to reduce the effect of the proposed project as described herein_ SOURCES: General Plan Land Use Element, City of Atascadero, 2002 Zoning Ordinance, part of Municipal Code, City of Atascadero, as amended through 1999. Land Use Element Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Crawford, Multari, & Clark, adopted 2002 CEQA Handbook, Air Quality Control District, August 1995 General Plan Safety Element, City of Atascadero, 2002 General Plan Circulation Element, 2002 General Plan Noise Element, adopted 2002 Acoustical Design Manual, Brown-Buntin Associates, 1991 Noise Ordinance, City of Atascadero, 1992 PROJECT SOURCES: Atascadero Draft Bicycle Transportation Plan II175710 Page 23 C:10ocoments and Setlinpslssim meal SettinsstTemporary Internet Files Contenr.Ot t]—WOZWS29ElBike Plan ISMND.doo