Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 042886 AGENDA - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting ATASCADERO ADMINISTRATION BUILDING FOURTH FLOOR, ROTUNDA ROOM APRIL 28, 1986 7 30 P.M. ** ALL COUNCIL MEMBERS, STAFF MEMBERS AND CITIZENS ARE REMINDED ** PLEASE SPEAK DIRECTLY INTO THE MICROPHONE Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Invocation Roll Call City Council Comments ** PROCLAMATION OF APPRECIATION TO DAVID CATHERINA ON HIS DEPARTURE FROM THE RECREATION DEPARTMENT ** PROCLAMATION PROCLAIMING MAY 4, 1986 AS "LOYALTY DAY" A. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Item A, Consent Calendar , are considered to be routine, and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. Thee will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and considered separately. Vote may be roll call. 1. Approval of Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of April 14, 1986 2. Approval of City Treasurer ' s Report - March 1-31, 1986 3. Approval of City Finance Report - March 1-31, 1986 4. Council Recognition of City Employee of the Month for March by the Employee Recognition Program Committee - Bill White 5. Approval of Proposed Resolution 41-85 - Prohibit Parking on San Andreas between Navarette and E1 Retiro 6. Claim by John L Gannon for $200 - (RECOMMEND DENIAL) 7 Authorization for Expenditure of Funds to the Business Improve- ment Association from Budgeted Appropriation in the Amount of $150 1 8. Approval of Tentative Tract Map 7-85 - 7700/7800 Balboa - Rich/Cuesta Engineering 9. Approval of Tentative Tract Map 20-84 - 5600 West Mall - Bethel Engineering and Associates 10. Tentative Tract Map 2-86 - 9650 Las Lomas - Lee/Sherer 11. Tentative Parcel Map 4-86 - 8855/8905 Corriente - Cassera/Cuesta Engineering B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES, AND REPORTS 1. Falcon Cable T V. to Present 1985 Calendar Year Franchise Payment 2. Proposed Zone Change 2G-85 - Revising the Zoning Map from RSF=Y, Residential Single Family (1 acre minimum with sewer) to RSF-X, Residential Single Family (1/2 acre minimum with sewer) - Coromar Road Area (City Initiated/Lopus) - Proposed Ordinance Number 124 - (FIRST READING) 3. Proposed General Plan Amendment 1D-86 and Zone Change 4-86 - 11455 Viejo Camino (Kankiewicz) a. Proposed Resolution 38-86 Amending General Plan from Suburban Single Family to High Density Multi-family and Including the Area within the Urban Services Line. b. Proposed Ordinance Number 125 Amending the Zoning Map from RS (Suburban Residential) to RMF-8 and 12, High Density Multi-family, 8 and 12 Units per Acre (FIRST READING) 4. Proposed General Plan Amendment 2J-85 and Zone Change 5-85 - City of Atascadero Initiated a. Proposed Resolution Number 45-85 Amending the General Plan text and General Plan Map Land Use Element pertaining to the establishment of high- density single family (10 ,000 square foot) land use designation b. Proposed Ordinance 110 Amending the Zoning Ordinance text relative to the establishment of a "W" suffix for 10,000 square foot minimum residential lots in the LSF and RSF Zoning Districts (FIRST READING) 2 5. General Plan Amendment 1J-86 and Zoning Map Amendments (Zone Change 10-86) Designating Specific Areas for 10, 000 Square Foot Lots a. STUDY AREA "A" (MORRO FLATS AREA) 1. Proposed Resolution Number 39-86 Amending the General Plan from Moderate Density Single Family to High Density Single Family (10,000 square foot lot) 2. Proposed Ordinance Number 126 Amending the Zoning Map from LSF-Y (Limited Single Family) to LSF-W (Limited Single Family, 10, 000 Square Foot Lot) (FIRST READING) b. STUDY AREA "B" (PALOMAR/ARCADE ROAD AREA) : 1. Proposed Resolution Number 40-86 Amending the General Plan from Moderate Density Single Family and High Density Single Family to High Density Single Family (10 ,000 square foot lot size) 2. Proposed Ordinance Number 127 Amending the Zoning Map from LSF-X (Limited Single Family) and RSF-Y (Residential Single Family) to LSF-X (Limited Single Family, 10 , 000 Square Foot Lot Size) (FIRST READING) C. STUDY AREA "C" (FRESNO/TUNITAS ROAD AREA) d. STUDY AREA "D" (LAS LOMAS AREA) 1. Proposed Resolution Number 42-86 Amending the General Plan From Low Density Single Family and Moderate Density Single Family to High Density Single Family (10, 000 square Foot Lot Size) 2. Proposed Ordinance 128 Amending the Zoning Map from RSF-Y (Residential Single Family, 1/2 Acre) to LSF-W (Limited Single Family, 10 ,000 Square Foot Lot Size) (FIRST READING) e. 9240 ATASCADERO ROAD 1. Proposed Resolution Number 43-86 Amending the General Plan from Moderate Density Single Family to High Density Single Family (1/2 Acre Lot Size) 2. Proposed Ordinance Number 129 Amending the Zoning Map from RSF-Y (Residential Single Family, one acre minimum) to RSF-X (Residential Single Family, 1/2 acre minimum lot size) (FIRST READING) 3 *00 400 C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. City Hall Renovation - Bid Tabulation of Phase IIB Structural (Restrooms Deleted) - Award Bid to La Freniere Construction for $104,200 D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Proposed Resolution 27-86 - Declaring Weeds a Public Nuisance & Commencing Proceedings for the Abatement of Said Nuisances 2. Proposed Revised Bid Procedures/Uniform Construction Cost Accounting E. ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT (ACSD) (Council will recess and convene as the Atascadero County Sanitation District Board of Directors) 1. Reassign Assessment District #3 Engineer (The Board of Directors will adjourn and reconvene as City Council) F. COMMUNITY FORUM G. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION 1. City Council 2. City Attorney 3. City Clerk 4. City Treasurer 5. City Manager 4 NOW MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL (MINUTES APPROVED BY COUNCIL, Regular Meeting, April 28, 1986, 7 : 30 p.m. WITH CORRECTION AS NOTED ON pG 6 , ON 5/12/86) Atascadero Administration Building The Regular Meeting of the Atascadero City Council was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Nelson, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present Councilmembers Handshy, Mackey, Norris & Mayor Nelson Absent: Councilman Molina (Vacation) STAFF Mike Shelton, City Manager ; Dave Jorgensen, Admin. Svcs Director ; Robert Jones, City Attorney/City Clerk; Bud McHale, Police Chief; Mike Hicks, Fire Chief; Henry Engen, Commun. Develop. Director ; Paul Sensi- baugh, Public Works Director; Steve DeCamp, Senior Planner; Cindy Wil- kins, Deputy City Clerk COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS Mayor Nelson read two proclamations - To David Catherina, acknowledging his contributions to Parks & Recreation and the City of Atascadero (most recently, his exten- sive work in the Phase I development of Paloma Creek Park) , as he leaves employment with the City; - Proclaiming May 4, 1986 , Loyalty Day (sponsored by the Veterans of Foreign Wars) A. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Approval of Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of April 14 , 1986 2 Approval of City Treasurer ' s Report - March 1-31, 1986 3. Approval of City Finance Report - March 1-31, 1986 4. Council Recognition of City Employee of the Month for March by the Employee Recognition Program Committee - Bill White 5. Approval of Proposed Resolution 41-86 - Prohibit Parking on San Andreas between Navarette and El Retiro 6. Claim by John L Gannon for $200 (RECOMMEND DENIAL) 7. Authorization for Expenditure of Funds to the Business Improve- ment Association from Budgeted Appropriation in the Amount of $150 1 8. Approval of Tentative Tract Map 7-85 - 7700/7800 Balboa Rich/ Cuesta Engineering 9. Approval of Tentative Tract Map 20-84 - 5600 West Mall - Bethel Engineering and Associates 10. Tentative Tract Map 2-85 - 9650 Las Lomas - Lee/Sherer 11. Tentative Parcel Map 4-85 - 8855/8905 Corriente - Cassera/Cuesta Engineering MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-11 seconded by Councilman Handshy; passed 4:0 by roll-call vote, with Councilman Molina absent. B. HEARINGS, APPEARANCES AND REPORTS 1. Falcon Cable T.V. to Present 1985 Calendar Year Franchise Pay- ment Tom Hatchell, representing Falcon Cable TV, presented a check in the amount of $28,727.00 to Mayor Nelson. 2. Proposed Zone Change 2G-85 - Revising the Zoning Map from RSF-Y, Residential Single-Family (1 acre minimum with sewer) to RSF-X, Residential Single-Family (1/2 acre minimum with sewer) - Coromar Road Area (City-Initiated/Lopus) - Proposed Ordinance No. 124 - (FIRST READING) Henry Engen, Commun. Develop. Director, gave staff report. Public Comment Dorothy Lopus, 8205 Coromar (applicant) , speaking on behalf of herself and her husband, spoke in support of their request. MOTION: By Councilman Handshy to read Ord. 124 by title only, seconded by Councilwoman Norris; passed unanimously, with Councilman Molina absent. Mayor Nelson read Ord. 124 by title only. MOTION: By Councilman Handshy that this constitutes the first reading of Ord. 124 , seconded by Councilwoman Norris; passed 3: 1, with Councilwoman Mackey voicing NO and Councilman Molina absent. Second reading will be at the May 12th Council meet- ing. 3 Proposed General Plan Amendment 1D-86 and Zone Change 4-86 - 11455 Viejo Camino (Kankiewicz) a. Proposed Resolution 38-86 Amending General Plan from Suburban Single Family to High den- 2 sity Multi-family and including the area within the Urban Ser- vices Line. b. Proposed Ordinance Number 125 Amending the Zoning Map from RS (Suburban Residential) to RMF- 8 and 12, High Density Multi-family, 8 and 12 Units per Acre (FIRST READING) Henry Engen, Commun. Devel. Director, gave staff report. Public Comment Tom Kankiewicz, applicant, spoke in support of request for zone change; with multi-family units going in around their property, it will no longer have its rural appeal, and the requested rezone would make it conducive to the surrounding properties Terril Graham, 6205 Conejo Rd. , expressed his concern that the City continues to proliferate multi-family housing based on a concept of a domino theory; also, he asked, is this in fact an ex post facto voting for the Urban Services Line (based on the vote that was taken for the new park) , or is this in fact a new and separate proposal? Henry Engen responded to Mr. Graham that there is a rewrite of the Public Services Element (coming to Council at next meeting) of the General Plan which speaks, in part, to the Urban Services Line; there is language legitimatizing the extension of sewer services to the new park, (which is outside City limits) but that would not enable provid- ing sewer services to the two parcels in question, thus their request to be included in the Urban Services Line. In light of Mr. Engen' s response, Mr . Graham asked Council to consider the areas already within the Urban Services Line which are not being served by the treatment plant. Bonita Borgeson, 4780 Del Rio, expressed that, although opposed to 10 , 000 sq ft. lots, she supports the Kankiewicz ' s request; the rezone would give them the opportunity to keep their property at fair market value, in view of the developments surrounding it. Bruno Adamoli , 5800 Llano Rd. , expressed concern about the impacts of growth on the capacity of the treatment plant; Mayor Nelson and Paul Sensibaugh, Pub. Works Director , summarized the findings of the recent sewer system study. Tom Kankiewicz spoke again, saying the Planning Dept. did not sug- gest this application, as Mr . Graham related earlier . Mr . Kankiewicz added that if Council would consider down-zoning their property fur- ther , it would be appropriate to him. Council discussion. MOTION By Councilman Handshy to deny GPA 1D-86 and Zone Change 4-86 without prejudice, seconded by Councilwoman Norris; passed 4 0 by roll-call vote, with Councilman Molina absent 3 %W 140 4. Proposed General Plan Amendment 2J-85 and Zone Change 5-85 - City of Atascadero-Initiated a. Proposed Resolution 45-85 Amending the General Plan text and General Plan Map Land Use Element pertaining to the establishment of high-density sin- gle-family (10,000 sq. ft. ) land use designation b. Proposed Ordinance 110 Amending the Zoning Ordinance text relative to the establish- ment of a "W" suffix for 10 , 000 sq. ft. minimum residential lots in the LSF and RSF Zoning Districts (FIRST READING) Henry Engen, Commun. Develop Director , gave staff report, followed by Council discussion. Public Comment Earl Ferguson, 5556 Tunitas (his property runs from Tunitas to Rosar- io) , expressed concern that if more units are built in that area, which is already narrow and windy, it will be increasingly hazardous. Art Jazwiecki, who has owned his lot on Tunitas for 17 years, asked where the multi-family lots in areas A, B, C & D are located, to which Mr. Engen responded. Mr. Jazwiecki expressed his feeling that 10, 000 sq. ft. lots might be acceptable if the majority of property owners in a specific area are in favor of it; he noted that when he first pur- chased his property it was zoned for 32 apartments per acre, and has come through RMF-16 to what it is now at RMF-10; he is concerned with losing the ability to put additional units on the property. Lydia Kellerman, resident, expressed that she feels 10, 000 sq. ft. zoning is most appropriate where there are multi-family units, espec- ially close to town, which gives young families the opportunity to have single-family units relatively close to town. George Highland, 7275 Carmelita, (who clarified that he doesn' t own property in any of the areas under consideration) expressed his con- viction that he believes the General Plan' s basic purpose is to permit the people in the community to set goals for what they visualize as an ideal community for them; he feels these goals can be realistic rather than idealistic, providing the governing body sticks to them. He claimed the maximum population capacity of the Plan has become 42, 000 (from 34, 500 upon its adoption in 1980) . He expressed opposition to 10, 000 sq. ft. lot zoning, feeling it will set a disastrous precedent for the City. Nina Marble, 9125 Pino Solo, expressed opposition to 10 ,000 sq. ft. lots, adding she would support it only with the stipulation that the lot must be zoned for 10 or more per acre before it can become a 10,000 sq. ft. lot, thereby down-zoning and not increasing population density. 4 NOW Celia Moss, 8040 Coromar and President of Atas Homeowners' Assn. , spoke in favor of maintaining Atascadero' s rural character ; in her efforts to find out how people feel about ' affordable housing ' , she did an unofficial survey in front of the Post Office last Thursday, between 9-10 a.m. , which revealed 80-90% of the people she spoke to consistently supported the General Plan, are concerned about the cur- rent amount of growth and basically want to maintain the large lots. Paulette Cooks, expressed that if Council considers rezoning Santa Ynez, both sides of the street should be rezoned to give all owners an opportunity to split their property. Elaine Oglesby, 9195 Santa Lucia Rd. , spoke in opposition to 10 ,000 ft. lots in order to maintain Atascadero' s distinguishing rural char- acter ; she encourages planned, orderly growth, expressing that growth may change the size of a community, but it doesn' t necessarily have to change its character . She implores Council to reject this proposal and confirm its faith in the uniqueness of Atascadero Mike Lucas, 8315 Atascadero Ave. , encourages that Council consider alternatives to 10 ,000 sq. ft. , as he doesn' t see any areas where it really fits. He feels if the 10 ,000 sq. ft. lots concept is adopted by Council, there' s a dedicated group who will rise up and oppose it, and the zoning will be changed back in 2-3 years, which would be very bad for long-range planning. Joe Wilmore, 5500 Llano Rd. (resident since 1950) , spoke in opposition to this proposal based on density concerns and in favor of maintaining rural character. John Stettler , 5510 Rosario, feels that, although there may be a prob- lem between the 10 per acre and 2 per acre that the City now faces, 10,000 sq. ft. lots is not the answer , it would set a precedent that the City could not live up to, and we would all be worse for it. Denny Clark, 4585 Viscano (new resident) , spoke in opposition to large clusters of apartments, such as the 400-unit project, based on his past experience as a law enforcement officer . He feels further time should be taken to study alternatives to 10, 000 sq. ft. lots. Frank Davis, 8920 Curbaril, spoke in favor of 10 ,000 sq. ft. lots for the benefit of young families who may be able to get into a first home. John Bunyea, 8942 Palomar (5-year resident) , spoke in support of affordable housing , which smaller lots might provide. Richard Shannon, 4820 Obispo Rd. , spoke in favor of 10,000 ft. lots; he recalled areas which were previously zoned multi-family and were changed in 1980 (at time of Gen. Plan adoption) to commercial zoning He stated, as a realtor , many people are looking for smaller parcels, and there are very few available. 5 r 4"0' Jaime Lopez-Balbontin, resident, spoke in favor of an alternative to 10, 000 sq. ft. lots by down-zoning some 2 1/2 to 10-acre lots; in favor of preserving rural character . Linda Hardy, 9705 Las Lomas, said that about 3 1/2 years ago, some neighbors initiated a petition in favor of 10 ,000 sq. ft. lots, which she and her husband fought all the way; now, however, condominium and apartments surround their once rural property, and they are for the rezone to 10,000 sq. ft. lots only to break even on their property. They are against a City-wide rezone Bill Poe, 10600 Realito, spoke in favor of 10 ,000 sq. ft. lots, and he offered some statistical (density) comparisons to other cities. Jon Langford, 8755 Junipero, thinks we need a clear definition of ' rural' . He feels it' s a misconception that 10 , 000 sq. ft. lots would change the character of Atascadero drastically and double the popula- tion and favors this proposal in his hopes to attain affordable hous- ing. He expressed faith in the City' s Engineering Dept. and their efforts to provide adequate public services. Rich Ashby, 8855 El Centro, spoke in favor of this proposal based on the need to provide affordable housing. Randy Farr , 5940 River Rd. (18-year resident) , spoke in favor of 10,000 sq. ft. lots in determined areas so we can progress instead of coming to a standstill. Bonita Borgeson, 4780 Del Rio Rd. , agreed with the comments of Mr . Highland and Mrs. Oglesby; she feels this issue should be put before the people, and that the issue appears to be Rural Atascadero vs. A Freeway City. She asked Council and the audience to ask themselves, "Did you move here for 10,000 sq. ft. lots or for the rural charac- ter?" . Discussion came back to Council, and each expressed their views. MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey to deny GPA 2J-85 (Proposed Res. No. 45-85) and Zone Change 5-85 (Proposed Ordinance 110) , second- ed by Mayor Nelson; failed by 2: 2 roll-call vote, with Councilmembers Norris and Handshy voting NO and Councilman Molina absent. MOTION: By Councilman Handshy to provide for a revision to the General Plan Land Use Element text to provide for a new land use designation allowing for 10,000 sq. ft. residential mini- mum lot sizes, and to revise Zoning Ordinance Sections 9-3.154 and 9-3. 164 to provide for 10,000 sq. ft. minimum residential lots * MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey to bring this item back in two weeks for decision by a full Council, seconded by Councilwoman Norris; passed 3 1, with Councilman Handshy voicing NO and Councilman Molina absent. * Add Motion seconded by Councilwoman Norris; failed by 2 2 roll- call, with Councilwoman Mackey and Mayor Nelson voting NO and Councilman Molina 6 absent (Correction announced at Council meeting of 5/12/86 by Councilman Handshy ) COUNCIL RECESSED FOR A FIVE-MINUTE BREAK. 5. General Plan Amendment 1J-86 and Zoning Map Amendments (Zone Change 10-86) Designating Specific Areas for 10,000 Square Foot Lots: a. STUDY AREA "A" (MORRO FLATS AREA) 1. Proposed Res. No. 39-86 2. Proposed Ord. No. 126 b. STUDY AREA "B" (PALOMAR/ARCADE ROAD AREA) 1. Proposed Res. No. 40-86 2. Proposed Ord. No. 127 c. STUDY AREA "C" (FRESNO/TUNITAS ROAD AREA) d. STUDY AREA "D" (LAS LOMAS AREA) 1 Proposed Res. No. 42-86 2. Proposed Ord. No. 128 e. 9240 ATASCADERO ROAD 1. Proposed Res. No. 43-86 2 Proposed Ord. No. 129 Mayor Nelson announced, as a result of previous motion, public hearing regarding Item B-5 are continued to next meeting, Council would hear testimony from persons wishing to address concerns regarding study areas. Public Comment Lydia Kellerman, resident, addressed the Tunitas area (Study Area "C") and supports 10 , 000 sq. ft. there because the area is becoming very dangerous due to increasing multiple units; increasing the potential number of units would only make things worse there. She read a letter addressed to Council from Robert & Cathryn Beach, who reside on Bajada expressing they favor a zone change on Bajada, Tunitas and Rosario from multi-family to single-family due to density and safety concerns. Jim Neelands, 5615 Bajada (Study Area C) , 27-year resident, expressed traffic safety concerns in that area and believes 10 , 000 sq. ft lot zoning would help there, and he encourages any zoning revision which would reduce the area' s potential for increased density. Mrs. Kellerman spoke again, announcing that she counted a total of 41 units (15 houses) on Tunitas. C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1 City Hall Renovation - Bid Tabulation of Phase IIB Structural (Restrooms Deleted) - Award Bid to La Freniere Construction for $104,200 7 Paul Sensibaugh, Public Works Director , gave staff report and introduced Mr. Richard Kopecky of Fred Schott & Associates, who are making recommendations on the structural renovation, Phase IIB. No public comment. MOTION By Councilwoman Mackey to approve acceptance of the bid from La Freniere Construction for $104, 200 , seconded by Council- woman Norris; passed 4 :0 by roll-call vote, with Councilman Molina absent. D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Proposed Resolution 27-86 - Declaring Weeds a Public Nuisance & Commencing Proceedings for the Abatement of Said Nuisances Mike Hicks, Fire Chief, gave staff report, noting that parcel owners will be notified of the requirement to abate weeds through a direct mailing (labels provided from County Assessor ' s Ofc. ) this year in- stead of posting properties as in the past. Public Comment Doug Lewis, resident, suggested that property owners be reminded of the availability of rental equipment which may encourage them to do the work themselves. MOTION By Councilwoman Mackey to approve Res. No. 27-86, seconded by Councilman Handshy; passed 4:0 , with Councilman Molina absent 2. Proposed Revised Bid Procedures/Uniform Construction Cost Account- ing Paul Sensibaugh, Public Works Director, gave staff report, with additional comments from Mike Shelton, City Manager . MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey to extend meeting past 11: 00 p.m. , seconded by Councilman Handshy; passed unanimously. Public Comment Art Jazwiecki, resident, asked if the trade journals are local, County or State-wide; Mr . Sensibaugh responded that they are local. Mr. Jazwiecki encourages the use of local contractors. MOTION: By Councilwoman Mackey to bring back this proposal in ordinance form, seconded by Councilman Handshy; passed 4 0 , with Councilman Molina absent. 8 MOTION: By Councilwoman Norris to recess as Council and convene as Atascadero County Sanitation District Board of Directors, seconded by Councilman Handshy; passed unanimously. E. ATASCADERO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT (ACSD) 1. Reassign Assessment District #3 Engineer Paul Sensibaugh, Public Works Director, gave staff report. Public Comment John Faulkenstein, Cuesta Engineering, introduced himself to Council. MOTION By Director Handshy to accept staff recommendation to termi- nate contract between ACSD and Kennaly Engineering and enter into contract with Cuesta Engineering, seconded by Director Mackey; passed 4:0 by roll-call vote, with Director Molina absent. MOTION: By Director Handshy to adjourn as ACSD Board of Directors and reconvene as City Council, seconded by Director Norris; passed unanimously. F. COMMUNITY FORUM Steve Devencenzi , representing the Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee, gave an update report from the last CTAC meeting. The two main issues discussed were: (1) Expansion of the regional handicapped system, and (2) a commuter bus linking San Luis Obispo and the South County. The next CTAC meeting is scheduled for May 6th. Lydia Kellerman, resident, expressed she appreciates the difficulty of the decision facing Council regarding the 10 ,000 sq. ft. issue; she hopes if they approve, the rezones will be strictly placed where it lends to an area (there should be a separation between multi-family and acreage) . She also inquired as to revitalizing the old downtown area and suggests gardens be placed along the creek for a congregation area. G. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION No comments. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 11 30 P.M. 9 RECORDED BY: ROBERT M. JES, City Clerk PREPARED BY: CINDY WILKINS, Dep. City Clerk 10