Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-076 a RESOLUTION NO 2006-076 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2006-0019 PREPARED FOR ZONE CHANGE 2005-0097, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2006-0088 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2005-0150 ON APN 030-292-022 (8255 San Andres/Barre) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Gene Barre (PO Box 776, Templeton, CA 93465) Applicant and Property Owner, to consider a project consisting of a Zone Change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-family-10) to RMF-10/PD25 (Residential Multi- Family-10 with a Planned Development Overlay 25) with corresponding Master Plan of Development and Vesting Tentative Tract Map located at 8255 San Andres Avenue, (APN 030- 292-022), and, WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2006-0019 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing on June 20, 2006 following the close of the review period to consider the Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the project will have no significant impacts with project specific mitigation measures incorporated, and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing on August 8, 2006, following the close of the review period, to consider the Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, and, NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, hereby resolves to certify Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2006-0019 based on the following Findings, and as shown in Exhibit A. 1 The Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA, and, 2. The Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was presented to the Planning Commission, and the information contained therein was considered by the Planning Commission, prior to recommending action on the project for which it was prepared, and, 3 The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment when mitigation measures are incorporated into the project; and, City of Atascadero Resolution No. 2006-076 Page 2 of 3 4 The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, and, 5 The project does not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable, and, 6 The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly; and, On motion by Council Member Clay and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Pacas, the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote AYES Council Members Clay, Luna, Pacas and Mayor O'Malley NOES None ABSENT One Vacancy ADOPTED August 8, 2006 CITY W TASCA O By Tom O'Malley, ATTEST Marcia McClure Torgerson, C M.0 , City lerk APPROV�D AS TO FQRM �atnck Ffirigl(,;., ity Attorney City of Atascadero Resolution No.2006-076 Page 3 of 3 ill+r Exhibit A Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2006-0019 CITY OF ATASCADERO PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION #2006-0019 6907 M Camino Real Atascadero CA 93422 805/461 5000 Avner/ Faget Bame,PO Box776,Templemn,CA 93465 434-1700 Applicant: Project Title: Zane Change 2005-0097 CUP 2005-0150 TTM200G0088 Planned Drve1opunt25 Project 8255 San Andres Averne,Amscadem,CA 93422 Location (Sm Luis Obispo Camdy)APN 030.292.022 prajQct The pruposedpsojectcondos of mapplicatienfaa a Zane Clum& Candbonal Lice Perin and OsBcription: TertatMTract Map for flucors=ticnoff aanew skde-famnlydretsonfrdiviivallots 4utwlu be develope dmukrihe requiremerds of flu Zawted Deve bpuxrt overky#25.One exktng home is Loramkon-site Im exainghome qualifies as ahistoric cokmyhame Hinenatice trees at proposedforramovtl Mm projectwtlltake access off of Sm Andres Ace ,ftillfrontage imgovemerdsw2lbe provided. GereralPkaDesigution MadimaDensiyResidertial ZanirgDkuict:ResiderumlMilttFarxvly-10(RUF 10) Findings: 1. The project does nothavethe pwrdialtodeaadethe ermirtimmerd. 2. The project willnotachieve short-termtothe disadcarapoflang-t,ermawiranmerdnlgoals 3 The project does nothwe impacts which atkdividualtylimitsdbutnrmula2ruetyconsiderable. 4 Mu project willnotcausesubstzruialadrerseeffectsenbummbeingsether directly orindirectly Determination: Basedanthe above fndungs,andthe h4ca-maticncordaizdedinthe ixiuialsvady2006-0019 Qmade apmthenofbyrefa ace and onfileinthe Community Development.Depattmemd hnsbeen determinedtheabove project will nothweanadverseimpact on the ermimrmmentwhenthe followingproposedmN�igatLonmeasures are incorporated imo the project(see attachment) Prepared By. XdoGleosaxArrociatePdaexuer Date Posted: May 25,2006 Publia Review Ends fine 14 2006 Attachments Locallm/Zoning Magi Aerial Photo Qmdmg and Draauge Plan Floor Plan and Elevations WftkgTerdatnve lYactMap Atboristrepart h1kial Study 2006-0019