Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet 081010
ARCHIVE COPY 0 CITY CLERK 2_ u CITY OFATASCA©ERO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Tuesday, August 10, 2010 600PM City Hall Council Chambers 6907 El Camino Real, Atascadero, California CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 6.00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley ROLL CALL. Mayor Fonzi Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley Council Member Beraud Council Member Clay Council Member Kelley APPROVAL OF AGENDA. Roll Call PRESENTATIONS 1 Presentations to outgoing members of Parks & Recreation Commission Matthew O'Connell, Youth Representative Dan Chacon, Commissioner A. CONSENT CALENDAR. (All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion 1 if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the item before action is taken DRAFT MINUTES Council meeting draft minutes are listed on the Consent Calendar for approval of the minutes Should anyone wish to request an amendment to draft minutes, the item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and their suggestion will be considered by the City Council If anyone desires to express their opinion concerning issues included in draft minutes, they should share their opinion during the Community Forum portion of the meeting ) 1 City Council Meeting Draft Minutes — July 27, 2010 ■ Recommendation. Council approve the Draft Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 [City Clerk] 2 June 2010 Accounts Payable and Payroll ■ Fiscal Impact: $1,737,217 74 ■ Recommendation. Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for June 2010 [Administrative Services] UPDATES FROM THE CITY MANAGER. (The City Manager will give an oral report on any current issues of concern to the City Council ) COMMUNITY FORUM (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to address the Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has jurisdiction Speakers are limited to three minutes Please state your name for the record before making your presentation The Council may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless changed by the Council ) B PUBLIC HEARINGS 1 Title 8 Building Code Text Amendments - Title 9 Planning and Zoning Text Amendments - PLN 2010-1364 / ZCH 2010-0159 (City of Atascadero) ■ Ex Parte Communications ■ Fiscal Impact: There are no fiscal impacts associated with the proposed code text updates ■ Recommendation. Planning Commission Recommends Council Introduce Draft Ordinance A for first reading, by title only, to approve PLN 2010-1364 (Zone Text Change ZCH 2010-0159) [Community Development] 2 2. Confirming the Cost of Vegetative Growth and/or Refuse Abatement ■ Ex Parte Communications ■ Fiscal Impact: The City will receive $124,950 00 from the 2010/2011 property tax rolls in weed abatement / refuse abatement assessments ■ Recommendation. Council adopt the Draft Resolution, confirming the cost of vegetative growth (weeds) and/or refuse (rubbish) abatement. [Fire] C MANAGEMENT REPORTS 1 Eagle Ranch Specific Plan — Council Direction on Processing of Specific Plan, Environmental Impact Report, and Public Review Process — PLN 2008-1280 / GPA 2008-0022 / SP 2008-0002 / ZCH 2008- 0150 (Eagle Ranch. LLC / RRM Design Group) ■ Fiscal Impact: The fiscal impact of the Specific Plan and EIR process on the City is expected to be minimal The City's cost recovery fees require that planning staff time is covered for the preparation of the Specific Plan and EIR. The project EIR will analyze the fiscal impacts of the project on the City of Atascadero Current City policies require residential portions of a project to be revenue neutral to the City The tourist services and resort components of the project are expected to be revenue positive to the .City ■ Recommendations. Council err►' 1 Endorse the Eagle Ranch public participation and project processing outline (Attachment 1), and, 2 Direct staff to issue requests for proposals (RFPs) for an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Eagle Ranch Specific Plan Project. [Community Development] 2. Historic City Hall Repair— Historic Cedar Trees — Issues and Options ■ Fiscal Impact: Staff has not estimated the fiscal impact of each of the options due to the unknown construction costs related to tree avoidance ■ Recommendation. Council direct staff to revise and recirculate the City Hall Repair Project Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) (PPN 2004-0141) to allow for the removal of the two Deodar Cedar trees A3 and A4 on the East Mall frontage and one Italian Cypress tree A7 on the West Mall frontage [Community Development] COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS (On their own initiative, Council Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda The Council may take action on items listed on the Agenda ) D COMMITTEE REPORTS (The following represent standing committees Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary) 3 Mayor Fonzi 1 Air Pollution Control District 2 County Mayors Round Table 3 Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC) Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley 1 League of California Cities — Council Liaison and CITIPAC Board Member 2. SLO Council of Governments, President (SLOCOG) 3 SLO Regional Transit Authority, President (SLORTA) Council Member Beraud 1 City/ Schools Committee 2 Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA) Council Member Clay 1 City / Schools Committee Council Member Kelley 1 Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Committee 2. Atascadero Youth Task Force 3 Homeless Services Oversight Council E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND / OR ACTION 1 City Council 2 City Clerk 3 City Treasurer 4 City Attorney 5 City Manager F ADJOURNMENT Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. Correspondence submitted at this public hearing will be distributed to the Council and available for review in the City Clerk's office. I, Victoria Randall, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Atascadero declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing agenda for the August 10, 2010 Regular Session of the Atascadero City Council was posted on August 3 2010 at the Atascadero City Hall, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 and was available for public review in the Customer Service Center at that location. Signed this 3`d day of August, 2010 at Atascadero, California. Victoria Randall, Deputy City Clerk City of Atascadero 4 City of Atascadero WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 6,00 p m. unless there is a Community Redevelopment Agency meeting commencing at 6 00 p m in which event the Council meeting will commence immediately following the conclusion of the Community Redevelopment Agency meeting Council meetings will be held at the City Hall Council Chambers, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero Matters are considered by the Council in the order of the printed Agenda. Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public inspection during City Hall business hours at the Front Counter of City Hall, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero and on our website www.atascadero.org An agenda packet is also available for public review at the Atascadero Library 6850 Morro Road. Contracts, Resolutions and Ordinances will be allocated a number once they are approved by the City Council. The minutes of this meeting will reflect these numbers. All documents submitted by the public during Council meetings that are either read into the record or referred to in their statement will be noted in the minutes and available for review in the City Clerk's office Council meetings are videotaped and audio recorded, and may be reviewed by the public. Copies of meeting recordings are available for a fee. Contact the City Clerk for more information (470-3400) In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City please contact the City Manager's Office or the City Clerk's Office, both at (805) 470-3400 Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA Under Agenda item 'COMMUNITY FORUM" the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having business with the Council to approach the lectern and be recognized. 1 Give your name for the record (not required) 2. State the nature of your business. 3 All comments are limited to 3 minutes. 4 All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council. 5 No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any other individual, absent or present This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum (unless changed by the Council) TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS(from Title 2, Chapter 1 of the Atascadero Municipal Code) Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will give their report, and the Council will ask questions of staff The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being considered to step up to the lectern. If you wish to speak for against or comment in any way- 1 You must approach the lectern and be recognized by the Mayor 2. Give your name(not required) 3 Make your statement 4 All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council 5 No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any other individual, absent or present 6 All comments limited to 3 minutes If you wish to use a computer presentation to support your comments, you must notify the City Clerk's office at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Digital presentations must be brought to the meeting on a USB drive or CD You are required to submit to the City Clerk a printed copy of your presentation for the record Please check in with the City Clerk before the meeting begins to announce your presence and turn in the printed copy he Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public comments will be Sheard by the Council. 5 J .� ITEM NUMBER. A -1 DATE 08/10/10 r dFr— CITY OF ATASCADE RO CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES Tuesday, July 27, 2010 City Hall Council Chambers 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, California REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING 6 00 P M PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING Immediately following the conclusion of the Community Redevelopment Agency Special Meeting CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION Immediately following the conclusion of the Public Financing Authority Meeting CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION — CALL TO ORDER Mayor Fonzi called the meeting to order at 6 07 p m and led the Pledge of Allegiance 6 ITEM NUMBER. A-1 DATE 08/10/10 ROLL CALL. Present: Council Members Clay, O'Malley, Kelley, Beraud and Mayor Fonzi Absent: None Others Present: City Clerk /Assistant to City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manager Jim Lewis, Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard, Community Development Director Warren Frace, Public Works Director Russ Thompson, Community Services Director Brady Cherry, Police Commander Stephen Gesell, Fire Chief Kurt Stone, and City Attorney Brian Pierik. APPROVAL OF AGENDA. Roll Call MOTION By Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley and seconded by Council Member Clay to approve the agenda. Motion passed 5.0 by a roll-call vote. A. CONSENT CALENDAR. 1 City Council Meeting Draft Minutes — June 22, 2010 ■ Recommendation. Council approve the Draft Meeting Minutes of June 22, 2010 [City Clerk] 2. May 2010 Accounts Payable and Payroll ■ Fiscal Impact: 2,917,057 33 ■ Recommendation. Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for May 2010 [Administrative Services] 3 Mid-Cycle Budget Revisions ■ Fiscal Impact: The Draft Resolution adopts a budget adjustment increasing wastewater expenditures by $75,000 in fiscal year 2009-2010 and decreasing wastewater expenditures by $75,000 in fiscal year 2010- 2011 for no net fiscal impact. ■ Recommendation. Council adopt Draft Resolution A amending the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 fiscal year budgets. [Administrative Services] -40 7 ITEM NUMBER. A -1 DATE 08/10/10 4 Temporary Road Closure — Hot EI Camino Cruise Nite 2010 ■ Fiscal Impact: No net fiscal impact. The cost of putting on the event is approximately $13,750 in budgeted funds and it is anticipated that these costs will be fully recovered through budgeted sponsorships and entry fees ■ Recommendation. Council adopt the Draft Resolution authorizing street closures on Friday, August 20, 2010, from 5 00 p m — 8 30 p m , and 5 00 p m — 11 00 p m for the Hot EI Camino Cruise Nite special event. [Community Services] 5. Purchase of Three Police Patrol Vehicles ■ Fiscal Impact: Approval of the purchase of three police patrol vehicles will result in the expenditure of $80,726 64 of budgeted Vehicle Replacement Funds ■ Recommendation. Council authorize the purchase of three (3) police patrol vehicles from Wondries Fleet Group in Alhambra, California, at a total cost of $80,726 64 [Police] 6 Fats, Oils and Grease Program - Second Reading of Title 7 (Public Works), Chapter 8 Municipal Code Text Amendment ■ Fiscal Impact: The FOG program is staffed with a single full-time employee in the current 2009-2011 budget and is funded through the wastewater fund As the program evolves and is further implemented, staffing levels and program funding will be monitored and modified as needed ■ Recommendation. Council adopt on second reading, by title only, the Draft Ordinance approving amendments to Title 7, Chapter 8 of the Atascadero Municipal Code to include provisions for a Fats, Oils and Grease Control Program [Public Works] MOTION By Council Member Clay and seconded by Council Member Beraud to approve the Consent Calendar Motion passed 5.0 by a roll-call vote. (#A-3 Resolution No 2010-058, #A-4 Resolution No. 2010-059, #A-6 Ordinance No. 551) UPDATES FROM THE CITY MANAGER. City Manager Wade McKinney gave an update on projects and issues within the City 8 ITEM NUMBER. A - 1 DATE. 08/10/10 COMMUNITY FORUM The following citizens spoke during Community Forum Dane Senser spoke twice, Lesley Axtell spoke twice (Exhibit A), Maggie Cox, Steve Martin, Barbie Butz, Jerry Clay spoke on behalf of Kathy Baker, and Mark Greenaway Mayor Fonzi closed the COMMUNITY FORUM period. B PUBLIC HEARINGS 1 Historic City Hall Update - Bonds ■ Fiscal Impact: The bond issue will not exceed $18,000,000 Annual debt service payments are expected to range between $800,000 and $2,000,000 The annual revenues received from the Agency will equal the additional annual debt service expenses There is no cost to adopt the written Financial Reserve Policy ■ Recommendations. Council 1 Adopt Draft Resolution A approving proceedings by the Atascadero Public Financing Authority for the issuance and sale of Lease Revenue Bonds to finance improvements to the City's Historic City Hall and the acquisition and development of other capital improvements throughout the geographic boundaries of the City, approving form and authorizing execution of related documents and approving official actions, and, 2 Adopt Draft Resolution B establishing a Financial Reserve Policy [Administrative Services] Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard gave the staff report and answered questions from the Council She introduced Mark Curran of Piper Jaffray who distributed handouts and explained the Bond process (Exhibits B & C) PUBLIC COMMENT The following citizens spoke on this item John Summer, Executive Director of the San Luis Obispo Visitors and Conference Bureau, David Bentz, Steve Martin, Bruce Bevins, Len Colamarino, Jim Wilkins, George Schroff, and Chuck Ward Mayor Fonzi closed the Public Comment period. MOTION By Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley and seconded by Council Member Clay to 1 Adopt Draft Resolution A approving proceedings by the Atascadero Public Financing Authority for the issuance and sale of Lease Revenue Bonds to finance improvements to the City's Historic City Hall and the acquisition and `w o 9 ITEM NUMBER. A-1 DATE. 08/10/10 development of other capital improvements throughout the **Moogeographic boundaries of the City, approving form and authorizing execution of related documents and approving official actions, and, 2 Adopt Draft Resolution B establishing a Financial Reserve Policy Motion passed 5.0 by a roll-call vote. (#1 Resolution No 2010- 060, #2 Resolution No. 2010-061) C MANAGEMENT REPORTS 1 Project Update #2 (Not a Public Hearing) - PLN 2009-1341 - CUP 2009- 0244 / RAB 2010-0019 - Conditional Use Permit for a 10 Screen Movie Theater/ Retail / Restaurant building, and request to Summarily Vacate a Portion of Atascadero Mall Ave and EI Camino Real - 6320 - 6490 EI Camino Real (Hoff/Wysong) ■ Fiscal Impact: There could be a fiscal impact to the City if the Council agrees to fund the preparation of any of the special studies for the project. The cost proposal for the traffic study is $8,750 The economic feasibly study is estimated to be $15,000 ■ Recommendation. Council provide direction to staff for processing the project application (This agenda item and any public comments are not part of the official public hearing for the project. Staff is providing Council with an update on the project and is requesting direction on how to process the project.) [Community Development] Community Development Director Warren Frace gave the staff report and answered questions from the Council EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley stated that he has had conversations with the property owner, Mr Wysong and Mr Sherer Mayor Fonzi stated she met with Anita Robinson and John McNinch to gather information, with Mr Rousch and Mr Wysong, and Maggie Cox to discuss timeline changes Council Member Kelley stated that he spoke to Frank Rimkus, and met with Larry Wysong regarding the processing of their application PUBLIC COMMENT The following citizens spoke on this item Lee Perkins, Len Colamarino, Tom Comar, Bruce Bevins, George Schroff, Karyn Sturevant, Barbie Butz, and Chuck Ward 14ar 10 ITEM NUMBER. A-1 DATE 08/10/10 Mayor Fonzi closed the Public Comment period. MOTION By Council Member Beraud and seconded by Council Member Clay to direct staff require all studies, continue to require the economic study, parking study and expanded master plan to be provided prior to a public hearing Motion passed 4 1 by a roll-call vote. (Kelley opposed) 2. Historic City Hall Rehabilitation Project Update ■ Fiscal Impact: There is a potential savings of up to a million dollars through the use of the multi-prime bidding strategy over the agency/general contractor method of bidding ■ Recommendation. Council direct staff to move forward with the Historic City Hall Rehabilitation Project and approve construction management multi-prime strategy for bidding as the most cost effective approach [Administrative Services] Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard gave the staff report and answered questions from the Council She introduced the Construction/Project Management firm, Bernards, who gave an update on their progress thus far PUBLIC COMMENT None w� MOTION By Council Member Clay and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley to direct staff to move forward with the Historic City Hall Rehabilitation Project and approve construction management multi-prime strategy for bidding as the most cost effective approach Motion passed 5.0 by a roll-call vote. 3. Final Draft of Baseline Greenhouse Gas Inventory - Community-Wide and Government Operations 2005 ■ Fiscal Impact: No current fiscal impact; report completed by grant through APCD ■ Recommendation. Council review and accept baseline greenhouse gas inventory report. [Community Development] This item was continued 11 ITEM NUMBER. A- 1 DATE 08/10/10 4. Response to 2009-2010 Grand Jury Report - Leaf Blower Hazards in San Luis Obispo County ■ Fiscal Impact: Fiscal impact of preparing and enforcing a leaf blower ordinance is currently unknown ■ Recommendation. Council approve the recommended response to the Grand Jury Report on Leaf Blower Hazards in San Luis Obispo County and direct staff to forward the approved response to the Presiding Judge of the San Luis Obispo Superior Court by July 29, 2010 [Community Development] Community Development Director Warren Frace gave the staff report and answered questions from the Council PUBLIC COMMENT None MOTION By Council Member Clay and seconded by Council Member Kelley to approve the recommended response to the Grand Jury Report on Leaf Blower Hazards in San Luis Obispo County and direct staff to forward the approved response to the Presiding Judge of the San Luis Obispo Superior Court by July 29, 2010 Motion passed 5.0 by a roll-call vote. 5. Revisions to the City's Facility Policies, Procedures and Fees Manual and Amendments and Additions to Fees for City Services ■ Fiscal Impact. Approval of the recommended changes to the City's Facility Policies, Procedures and Fees will result in minor increases in revenue from rental functions Approval of the recommended addition of new fees and amendments to specified fees for City Services will result in some additional revenues, and some minor revenue reductions in field usage rental fees. ■ Recommendations Council 1 Adopt Draft Resolution A amending the City of Atascadero Facility Policies, Procedures and Fees Manual, and, 2 Adopt Draft Resolution B adding new fees and amending specified fees for City Services [Community Services] This item was continued COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS None D COMMITTEE REPORTS None E INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND / OR ACTION None 12 ITEM NUMBER. A - 1 DATE. 08/10/10 F ADJOURNMENT *40 Mayor Fonzi adjourned the meeting at 10 20 p m MINUTES PREPARED BY Marcia McClure Torgerson, C M C City Clerk/Assistant to the City Manager The following exhibit is available for review in the City Clerk's office Exhibit A— Prepared statement from Colonel Bill Hatch read by Lesley Axtell Exhibit B—Standard & Poor's Global Credit Portal for Atascadero Public Financing Authority Exhibit C—Redevelopment Overview and Agency Update 13 ITEM NUMBER. A-2 DATE. 08/10/10 iaia ■ �9 s A tascadero City Council Staff Report Administrative Services Department June 2010 Accounts Payable and Payroll RECOMMENDATION Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for June 2010 DISCUSSION Attached for City Council review and approval are the following Payroll Dated 06/10/10 Checks # 27931 - 27963 $ 19,614 88 Direct Deposits 232,958 53 Dated 06/24/10 Checks # 27965 - 28009 23,481 09 Direct Deposits 238,154 36 Accounts Payable Dated 06/01/10-06/30/10 Checks # 124776 - 125108 & EFTs 836 - 847 1,223,008 88 TOTAL AMOUNT $ 1,737,217 74 FISCAL IMPACT Total expenditures for all funds is $ 1,737,217 74 CERTIFICATION The undersigned certifies that the attached demands have been released for payment and that funds are available for these demand, - Rachelle Rickard, Director of Administrative Services ATTACHMENT June 2010 Eden Warrant Register in the amount of $ 1,223,008 88 Nrr 14 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2010 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 836 06/01/2010 RABOBANK, N.A. Payroll Vendor Payment 41,860.26 837 06/01/2010 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEIN Payroll Vendor Payment 83,161 56 838 06/01/2010 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 12,674 71 839 06/01/2010 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1,28885 124776 06/04/2010 A&T ARBORISTS INC Accounts Payable Check 1,200 00 124777 06/04/2010 ACCENTS Accounts Payable Check 10432 124778 06/04/2010 AECOM USA, INC Accounts Payable Check 1 89000 124779 06/04/2010 KEITH AGGSON Accounts Payable Check 292.00 124780 06/04/2010 AGP VIDEO INC Accounts Payable Check 4,02000 124781 06/04/2010 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC Accounts Payable Check 17615 124782 06/04/2010 AMERICAN MARBORG Accounts Payable Check 5369 124783 06/04/2010 AMERICAN WEST TIRE&AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 78349 124784 06/04/2010 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 322.16 124785 06/04/2010 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 1,24331 124786 06/04/2010 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 17490 124787 06/04/2010 ATASCADERO COMMUNITY Accounts Payable Check 31,133 00 124788 06/04/2010 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO Accounts Payable Check 85080 124789 06/04/2010 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 2,24000 124790 06/04/2010 ATASCADERO TRAFFIC WAY STORAGE Accounts Payable Check 576 Ol. 124791 06/04/2010 JENAMARIE P BAIRD Accounts Payable Check 2450 124792 06/04/2010 BATTERY SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 2585 124793 06/04/2010 BCS, LLC Accounts Payable Check 6,307.29 124794 06/04/2010 TOM BIRKENFELD Accounts Payable Check 292.00 124795 06/04/2010 JOHN BLAIR Accounts Payable Check 11 00 124796 06/04/2010 BMW&YAMAHA OF SANTA CRUZ Accounts Payable Check 231 66 124797 06/04/2010 BRUMIT DIESEL, INC Accounts Payable Check 7403 124798 06/04/2010 BURTON'S FIRE, INC Accounts Payable Check 272.15 124799 06/04/2010 BUTLER BUSINESS MACHINES Accounts Payable Check 6387 124800 06/04/2010 C3 CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT Accounts Payable Check 85,512.64 124801 06/04/2010 CALIFORNIA CODE CHECK Accounts Payable Check 10 773 64 124802 06/04/2010 CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION CORP Accounts Payable Check 3,84500 124803 06/04/2010 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL Accounts Payable Check 15500 124804 06/04/2010 CALPORTLAND Accounts Payable Check 442.30 124805 06/04/2010 JASON F CARR Accounts Payable Check 17900 124806 06/04/2010 CASH Accounts Payable Check 3500 124807 06/04/2010 CENTAURI LABS INC Accounts Payable Check 6000 124808 06/04/2010 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA ASA Accounts Payable Check 77400 124809 06/04/2010 BRADY CHERRY Accounts Payable Check 30000 124810 06/04/2010 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL, INC Accounts Payable Check 20 0( 124811 06/04/2010 KATHLEEN J CINOWALT Accounts Payable Check 26250 15 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2010 Check Check umber Date Vendor Description Amount 124812 06/04/2010 COAST ELECTRONICS Accounts Payable Check 10874 124813 06/04/2010 COASTAL COPY LP Accounts Payable Check 20342 124814 06/04/2010 COASTAL REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 30.29 124815 06/04/2010 COLONY AUTO SERVICE, INC Accounts Payable Check 43542 124816 06/04/2010 COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Accounts Payable Check 34 50 124817 06/04/2010 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 151 60 124818 06/04/2010 CSULB FOUNDATION Accounts Payable Check 60000 124819 06/04/2010 MATTHEW J CURRY Accounts Payable Check 37500 124820 06/04/2010 D4 ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 19737 124821 06/04/2010 DARRYL'S LOCK AND SAFE Accounts Payable Check 17866 124822 06/04/2010 SANDRA N DEAL PH.D Accounts Payable Check 32500 124823 06/04/2010 CYNTHIA L. DECKER Accounts Payable Check 42000 124824 06/04/2010 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 4761 124825 06/04/2010 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Accounts Payable Check 1 74600 124826 06/04/2010 KELLYE R. DILLER Accounts Payable Check 49361 124827 06/04/2010 DRIVE CUSTOMS Accounts Payable Check 32556 124828 06/04/2010 ENTENMANN-ROVIN CO Accounts Payable Check 14862 124829 06/04/2010 EQ-WINE COVERS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 16085 124830 06/04/2010 ESCUELA DEL RIO Accounts Payable Check 72.00 124831 06/04/2010 FEDERAL EXPRESS Accounts Payable Check 5974 124832 06/04/2010 FENCE FACTORY ATASCADERO Accounts Payable Check 12873 124833 06/04/2010 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 18000 124834 06/04/2010 FILIPPONI &THOMPSON DRILLING Accounts Payable Check 59031 124835 06/04/2010 FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC INC Accounts Payable Check 10000 124836 06/04/2010 FIRSTLINE GLOVES INC Accounts Payable Check 15436 124837 06/04/2010 KEN FORMAN Accounts Payable Check 1000 124838 06/04/2010 WARREN FRACE Accounts Payable Check 30000 124839 06/04/2010 FRAZEE INDUSTRIES INC Accounts Payable Check 2165 124840 06/04/2010 FREEDOM POWDER COATING Accounts Payable Check 3,342.00 124841 06/04/2010 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 1,26559 124842 06/04/2010 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 41089 124843 06/04/2010 GIERLICH-MITCH ELL, INC Accounts Payable Check 11,646 66 124844 06/04/2010 KRISTIN B GILES Accounts Payable Check 18000 124845 06/04/2010 KENNETH J GLYNN Accounts Payable Check 102.20 124846 06/04/2010 GOLDEN STATE COPIER&MAILING Accounts Payable Check 1369 124847 06/04/2010 GOLDFARB&LIPMAN LLP Accounts Payable Check 172.14 124848 06/04/2010 KARREN GREEVER Accounts Payable Check 2500 124849 06/04/2010 GROUND UP DESIGN&CONST MGMT Accounts Payable Check 67500 124850 06/04/2010 HAMILTON ESTATE JEWELRY Accounts Payable Check 7500 124851 06/04/2010 BARRY HARDY Accounts Payable Check 14500 124852 06/04/2010 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 30955 16 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2010 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 124853 06/04/2010 KELLIE K. HART Accounts Payable Check 26618 124854 06/04/2010 HARVEY'S HONEYHUTS Accounts Payable Check 49618 124855 06/04/2010 NATHAN HASCH Accounts Payable Check 39596 124856 06/04/2010 HELPING HAND HEALTH EDUCATION Accounts Payable Check 26000 124857 06/04/2010 HENRY SCHEIN, INC Accounts Payable Check 29.25 124858 06/04/2010 CHRISTOPHER HESTER Accounts Payable Check 37866 124859 06/04/2010 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS Accounts Payable Check 1 51951 124860 06/04/2010 IN THE SWIM Accounts Payable Check 121 57 124861 06/04/2010 INGLIS PET HOTEL Accounts Payable Check 44310 124862 06/04/2010 ZACHARIAH JACKSON Accounts Payable Check 24300 124863 06/04/2010 JAMES LEE WITT ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 319894 124864 06/04/2010 JIFFY LUBE/SOUND BILLING Accounts Payable Check 25790 124865 06/04/2010 KANEY Accounts Payable Check 90 92 124866 06/04/2010 DAREN KENNETT Accounts Payable Check 12.00 124867 06/04/2010 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONARY Accounts Payable Check 138.23 124868 06/04/2010 LEE&ASSOCIATES RESCUE EQUIP Accounts Payable Check 40480 124869 06/04/2010 JAMES R. LEWIS Accounts Payable Check 25000 124870 06/04/2010 MADRONE LANDSCAPES INC Accounts Payable Check 3,33500 124871 06/04/2010 MARTINELLI LANDSCAPE CONST INC Accounts Payable Check 84500 124872 06/04/2010 DAN MCGAULEY Accounts Payable Check 292.0 124873 06/04/2010 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 50000 124874 06/04/2010 MICHAEL BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 38,035 75 124875 06/04/2010 MID-COAST GEOTECHNICAL, INC Accounts Payable Check 2,32000 124876 06/04/2010 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW Accounts Payable Check 4762 124877 06/04/2010 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 38853 124878 06/04/2010 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 132.00 124879 06/04/2010 JOHNNY F MITCHELL Accounts Payable Check 228 00 124880 06/04/2010 DAVE MUEHLHAUSEN Accounts Payable Check 1996 124881 06/04/2010 WILLIAM M. NASON Accounts Payable Check 4000 124882 06/04/2010 NCI AFFILIATES INC Accounts Payable Check 75375 124883 06/04/2010 NORTH AMERICAN YOUTH ACTIVITIE Accounts Payable Check 1,95300 124884 06/04/2010 NORTH COAST ENGINEERING INC Accounts Payable Check 73500 124885 06/04/2010 OFFICE DEPOT INC Accounts Payable Check 64535 124886 06/04/2010 TARA ORLICK Accounts Payable Check 2400 124887 06/04/2010 OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 3678 124888 06/04/2010 PACIFIC COAST GYMNASTICS CENTE Accounts Payable Check 23800 124889 06/04/2010 PASO ROBLES FORD LINCOLN MERC Accounts Payable Check 1,26797 124890 06/04/2010 LARRY PATAGUE Accounts Payable Check 13000 124891 06/04/2010 PC MECHANICAL, INC Accounts Payable Check 5 369 13 124892 06/04/2010 PFEIFFER PARTNERS INC Accounts Payable Check 47,194 8; y 124893 06/04/2010 JASON M. PLATZ Accounts Payable Check 3600 17 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2010 Check Check umber Date Vendor Description Amount 124894— 06/04/2010 ANDREW G. PRATT Accounts Payable Check 19000 124895 06/04/2010 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY INC Accounts Payable Check 472.29 124896 06/04/2010 QUALITY CODE PUBLISHING LLC Accounts Payable Check 1,52696 124897 06/04/2010 QUILL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 22073 124898 06/04/2010 RADIO SHACK CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 12.98 124899 06/04/2010 RAVATT,ALBRECHT &ASSC INC Accounts Payable Check 2,02580 124900 06/04/2010 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 30.26 124901 06/04/2010 JAMES RICHARDSON Accounts Payable Check 800 124902 06/04/2010 RACHELLE RICKARD Accounts Payable Check 30000 124903 06/04/2010 MICHELLE R. ROGERS Accounts Payable Check 21000 124904 06/04/2010 VOID Accounts Payable Check 000 124905 06/04/2010 SANTA MARIA TIRE, INC Accounts Payable Check 2,740.22 124906 06/04/2010 SCOTT SATTERTHWAITE Accounts Payable Check 292.00 124907 06/04/2010 LINDA SCHMAELING Accounts Payable Check 6000 124908 06/04/2010 SCOTT O'BRIEN FIRE&SAFETY CO Accounts Payable Check 15763 124909 06/04/2010 DAVID L. SMAW Accounts Payable Check 38 00 124910 06/04/2010 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY Accounts Payable Check 691 34 124911 06/04/2010 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1,85800 124912 06/04/2010 TAYLOR RENTAL CENTER Accounts Payable Check 6676 124913 06/04/2010 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS Accounts Payable Check 861 124914 06/04/2010 TESCO CONTROLS INC Accounts Payable Check 37500 124915 06/04/2010 TESORO FLEET SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 6,80085 124916 06/04/2010 RUSS THOMPSON Accounts Payable Check 30000 124917 06/04/2010 TRAILER BARN INC Accounts Payable Check 8805 124918 06/04/2010 TW TELECOM, INC Accounts Payable Check 80666 124919 06/04/2010 ULTREX BUSINESS PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 451 09 124920 06/04/2010 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, N.A. Accounts Payable Check 87500 124921 06/04/2010 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check 2,59994 124922 06/04/2010 IWINA VAN BEEK Accounts Payable Check 3800 124923 06/04/2010 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 2,69945 124924 06/04/2010 VIDEO PALACE Accounts Payable Check 1083 124925 06/04/2010 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 19078 124926 06/04/2010 WILLIAM P WHITE Accounts Payable Check 292.00 124927 06/04/2010 JEFF WILSHUSEN Accounts Payable Check 17900 124928 06/11/2010 ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN. Payroll Vendor Payment 63000 124929 06/11/2010 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 4000 124930 06/11/2010 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS Payroll Vendor Payment 96000 124931 06/11/2010 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC Payroll Vendor Payment 2,53616 124932 06/11/2010 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 9,10077 ' °124933 06/11/2010 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment 54010 18 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2010 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 124934 06/11/2010 SEIU LOCAL 620 Payroll Vendor Payment 85786 124935 06/11/2010 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 Payroll Vendor Payment 311 61 124936 06/11/2010 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 Payroll Vendor Payment 3,61889 124937 06/11/2010 CHEVRON&TEXACO BUS CARD SVC Accounts Payable Check 3,262.15 124938 06/11/2010 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 16,086 34 124939 06/11/2010 SHELL Accounts Payable Check 18983 124940 06/14/2010 ALLSTATE WORKPLACE DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 4,502.24 124941 06/14/2010 CSAC EIA Payroll Vendor Payment 1 19558 124942 06/14/2010 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES Payroll Vendor Payment 1,610.26 124943 06/14/2010 PREFERRED BENEFITS INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 8,31086 124944 06/14/2010 SDRMA Payroll Vendor Payment 120,071 99 840 06/15/2010 RABOBANK, N.A. Payroll Vendor Payment 40,576 70 841 06/15/2010 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 84,281.20 842 06/15/2010 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 12,092.34 843 06/15/2010 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1,29544 124945 06/18/2010 AIR&GAS TECHNOLOGIES INC Accounts Payable Check 4800 124946 06/18/2010 AK&COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 2,50000 124947 06/18/2010 ALL ABOUT PRODUCE, INC Accounts Payable Check 260 75 124948 06/18/2010 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC Accounts Payable Check 50 06440 124949 06/18/2010 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC Accounts Payable Check 2,00856 124950 06/18/2010 AMERICAN MARBORG Accounts Payable Check 16981 124951 06/18/2010 AMI PIPE&SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 3,83304 124952 06/18/2010 SALLY ANDERSON Accounts Payable Check 32.00 124953 06/18/2010 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS-WEST Accounts Payable Check 131 17 124954 06/18/2010 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 49766 124955 06/18/2010 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 13091 124956 06/18/2010 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 61 16 124957 06/18/2010 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 691 45 124958 06/18/2010 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 411 71 124959 06/18/2010 ATASCADERO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Accounts Payable Check 38500 124960 06/18/2010 ATASCADERO HAY&FEED Accounts Payable Check 40405 124961 06/18/2010 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO Accounts Payable Check 7,59070 124962 06/18/2010 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 3,23500 124963 06/18/2010 DAVID ATHEY Accounts Payable Check 5.25 124964 06/18/2010 BASSETT'S CRICKET RANCH INC Accounts Payable Check 6342 124965 06/18/2010 VOID Accounts Payable Check 000 124966 06/18/2010 JUSTIN BLACK Accounts Payable Check 13000 124967 06/18/2010 BOTACH TACTICAL.COM Accounts Payable Check 9,70876 124968 06/18/2010 BURTON'S FIRE, INC Accounts Payable Check 587 33 19 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2010 Check Check umber Date Vendor Description Amount 124969 06/18/2010 C& H DISTRIBUTORS LLC Accounts Payable Check 14345 124970 06/18/2010 CALIFORNIA CODE CHECK Accounts Payable Check 3 458 75 124971 06/18/2010 CALPORTLAND Accounts Payable Check 5 071 01 124972 06/18/2010 KATE CAPELA Accounts Payable Check 3476 124973 06/18/2010 CENTAURI LABS INC Accounts Payable Check 18750 124974 06/18/2010 CENTRAL COAST R&R LOCK Accounts Payable Check 5859 124975 06/18/2010 CENTRAL COAST SEA FOOD Accounts Payable Check 32088 124976 06/18/2010 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL, INC Accounts Payable Check 8000 124977 06/18/2010 CITY MOTORS TOWING INC Accounts Payable Check 33500 124978 06/18/2010 CITY OF ATASCADERO Accounts Payable Check 62363 124979 06/18/2010 CLASSIC COACH WERKS Accounts Payable Check 71592 124980 06/18/2010 COAST ELECTRONICS Accounts Payable Check 1,09913 124981 06/18/2010 CONOCOPHILLIPS Accounts Payable Check 2,34899 124982 06/18/2010 COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Accounts Payable Check 44100 124983 06/18/2010 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 18940 124984 06/18/2010 CULLIGAN INDUSTRIAL WATER SYST Accounts Payable Check 7000 124985 06/18/2010 DAVE BANG ASSC INC Accounts Payable Check 8 771 18 124986 06/18/2010 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 13382 124987 06/18/2010 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Accounts Payable Check 1,503.29 124988 06/18/2010 DISH NETWORK, LLC Accounts Payable Check 9199 124989 06/18/2010 DOCUTEAM Accounts Payable Check 4340 124990 06/18/2010 BRADLEY DYKHOUSE Accounts Payable Check 24300 124991 06/18/2010 ED'S FLY MEAT INC Accounts Payable Check 6450 124992 06/18/2010 EL CAMINO VETERINARY HOSP Accounts Payable Check 18391 124993 06/18/2010 ESCUELA DEL RIO Accounts Payable Check 19800 124994 06/18/2010 EWING IRRIGATION GOLF INDUSTRL Accounts Payable Check 660.22 124995 06/18/2010 FENCE FACTORY ATASCADERO Accounts Payable Check 128.73 124996 06/18/2010 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 48595 124997 06/18/2010 FIRST TRANSIT INC Accounts Payable Check 20,764 19 124998 06/18/2010 FLUID RESOURCE MANAGEMENT INC Accounts Payable Check 3,21750 124999 06/18/2010 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 398 125000 06/18/2010 FRAZEE INDUSTRIES INC Accounts Payable Check 10781 125001 06/18/2010 GALLS AN ARAMARK COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 2448 125002 06/18/2010 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 12802 125003 06/18/2010 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 66889 125004 06/18/2010 GEMPLER'S Accounts Payable Check 7339 125005 06/18/2010 GILBERT'S LANDSCAPES Accounts Payable Check 60000 125006 06/18/2010 GOLDEN BAY MECHANICAL, INC Accounts Payable Check 54796 125007 06/18/2010 GOLDING CONCRETE SAWING Accounts Payable Check 20000 125008 06/18/2010 GOPHER STOMPERS INC Accounts Payable Check 11000 125009 06/18/2010 GRAINGER Accounts Payable Check 263.09 20 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2010 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 125010 06/18/2010 CYNTHIA A.GREEN Accounts Payable Check 10800 125011 06/18/2010 GREENSCAPE AERATION CO Accounts Payable Check 42500 125012 06/18/2010 H.D PETERSON Accounts Payable Check 2000 125013 06/18/2010 HANSEN BRO'S CUSTOM FARMING Accounts Payable Check 14,460 00 125014 06/18/2010 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 4947 125015 06/18/2010 NATHAN HASCH Accounts Payable Check 9000 125016 06/18/2010 HELIXSTORM, INC Accounts Payable Check 10,996 02 125017 06/18/2010 HEWLETT-PACKARD Accounts Payable Check 12,688 68 125018 06/18/2010 LYNELLE HOLLARMAN Accounts Payable Check 32.00 125019 06/18/2010 ICE TEES CUSTOM SCREENPRINTING Accounts Payable Check 305.27 125020 06/18/2010 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Accounts Payable Check 43985 125021 06/18/2010 INTERSTATE BILLING SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 1,94465 125022 06/18/2010 J CARROLL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 12691 125023 06/18/2010 JAMES LEE WITT ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 1,35068 125024 06/18/2010 JESPERSEN'S TIRE SERVICE, INC Accounts Payable Check 2500 125025 06/18/2010 JIFFY LUBE/SOUND BILLING Accounts Payable Check 69.27 125026 06/18/2010 JOEL SWITZER DIESEL REPAIR INC Accounts Payable Check 232.56 125027 06/18/2010 ANN JUTRAS Accounts Payable Check 42.65 125028 06/18/2010 K.D JANNI LANDSCAPING INC Accounts Payable Check 36778 125029 06/18/2010 KAREN'S CUSTOM PAINTING Accounts Payable Check 752.37 125030 06/18/2010 LANDSCAPES BY STACH Accounts Payable Check 690 00 125031 06/18/2010 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO INC Accounts Payable Check 10,100 00 125032 06/18/2010 LEHI VALLEY TRADING COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 6145 125033 06/18/2010 LEHIGH HANSON Accounts Payable Check 33879 125034 06/18/2010 LOCATE PLUS CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 2500 125035 06/18/2010 MADRONE LANDSCAPES INC Accounts Payable Check 2,242.00 125036 06/18/2010 MAINLINE UTILITY CO Accounts Payable Check 2,47500 125037 06/18/2010 MARTINELLI LANDSCAPE CONST INC Accounts Payable Check 1,551 83 125038 06/18/2010 BECKY MAXWELL Accounts Payable Check 81 05 125039 06/18/2010 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 11700 125040 06/18/2010 MEDCO SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 11875 125041 06/18/2010 CORY MEYER Accounts Payable Check 25000 125042 06/18/2010 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 45390 125043 06/18/2010 JOHNNY F MITCHELL Accounts Payable Check 22800 125044 06/18/2010 DAVE MUEHLHAUSEN Accounts Payable Check 1000 125045 06/18/2010 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 15594 125046 06/18/2010 NADOLSKI HEALTH SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 22000 125047 06/18/2010 WILLIAM M. NASON Accounts Payable Check 36900 125048 06/18/2010 NATIONAL FIRE FIGHTER WILDLAND Accounts Payable Check 2,66700 125049 06/18/2010 NCI AFFILIATES INC Accounts Payable Check 335 OC 125050 06/18/2010 NORTH CO COMMUNICATIONS LLC Accounts Payable Check 320 00 NWO 21 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2010 Check Check umber Date Vendor Description Amount 125051 06/18/2010 OFFICE DEPOT INC Accounts Payable Check 57328 125052 06/18/2010 OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 3748 125054 06/18/2010 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 20,918 96 125055 06/18/2010 PASO ROBLES SAFE&LOCK Accounts Payable Check 1500 125056 06/18/2010 PERFORMANCE SWEEPING INC Accounts Payable Check 1,92000 125057 06/18/2010 PERRY'S PARCEL&COURIER SVC Accounts Payable Check 91 97 125058 06/18/2010 DEBBIE PICKERING Accounts Payable Check 12000 125059 06/18/2010 JASON M. PLATZ Accounts Payable Check 21600 125060 06/18/2010 ANDREW G. PRATT Accounts Payable Check 13300 125061 06/18/2010 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY INC Accounts Payable Check 461 30 125062 06/18/2010 PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER, INC Accounts Payable Check 34570 125063 06/18/2010 PUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY Accounts Payable Check 192.60 125064 06/18/2010 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 460 125065 06/18/2010 RITTERBUSH REPAIR SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 1,09450 125066 06/18/2010 ROB DAVIS BACKHOE Accounts Payable Check 14,035 00 125067 06/18/2010 JAMES STEVEN ROBINSON DVM Accounts Payable Check 10,000 00 125068 06/18/2010 ROSSI TRANSPORT SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 681 98 125069 06/18/2010 SAFETY DRIVERS ED LLC Accounts Payable Check 3430 125070 06/18/2010 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SHERIFF Accounts Payable Check 4000 125071 06/18/2010 MICHELE SCHAMBER Accounts Payable Check 561.24 125072 06/18/2010 JOHN C SIEMENS Accounts Payable Check 1,06400 125073 06/18/2010 SLO COUNTY NEWSPAPERS-TRIBUNE Accounts Payable Check 17000 125074 06/18/2010 SMART AND FINAL Accounts Payable Check 10911 125075 06/18/2010 DAVID L. SMAW Accounts Payable Check 7600 125076 06/18/2010 JASON SMITH Accounts Payable Check 292.00 125077 06/18/2010 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1 05000 125078 06/18/2010 TAYLOR RENTAL CENTER Accounts Payable Check 5446 125079 06/18/2010 TESCO CONTROLS INC Accounts Payable Check 52500 125080 06/18/2010 MARCIA TORGERSON Accounts Payable Check 1300 125081 06/18/2010 TOSTE CONSTRUCTION Accounts Payable Check 1,04000 125082 06/18/2010 ANTHONY J TRAVERSO Accounts Payable Check 3600 125085 06/18/2010 U S. BANK Accounts Payable Check 15,616 92 125086 06/18/2010 ULTREX BUSINESS PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 73782 125087 06/18/2010 UNITROUSTINGER SPIKE SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 10650 125088 06/18/2010 UPS Accounts Payable Check 3358 125089 06/18/2010 URBAN FUTURES INC Accounts Payable Check 58500 125090 06/18/2010 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check 3,63896 125091 06/18/2010 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 48862 125092 06/18/2010 WALLACE GROUP Accounts Payable Check 19750 125093 06/18/2010 WILSON LAND SURVEYS INC Accounts Payable Check 85000 125094 06/18/2010 ELAINE WOLFE Accounts Payable Check 1600 22 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2010 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 125095 06/18/2010 XO PANDORA Accounts Payable Check 50000 125096 06/18/2010 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 822.10 125097 06/21/2010 BERNARDS Accounts Payable Check 59,588 94 125098 06/25/2010 ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 63000 125099 06/25/2010 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 4000 125100 06/25/2010 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS Payroll Vendor Payment 96000 125101 06/25/2010 AXA EQUITABLE Payroll Vendor Payment 52012 125102 06/25/2010 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC Payroll Vendor Payment 2 536 16 125103 06/25/2010 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC Payroll Vendor Payment 16000 125104 06/25/2010 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 9,10077 125105 06/25/2010 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment 79679 125106 06/25/2010 SEIU LOCAL 620 Payroll Vendor Payment 85950 125107 06/25/2010 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 Payroll Vendor Payment 31161 125108 06/25/2010 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 Payroll Vendor Payment 1,61889 844 06/29/2010 RABOBANK, N.A. Payroll Vendor Payment 42,772.16 845 06/29/2010 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEA Payroll Vendor Payment 83,246 97 846 06/29/2010 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 12,966.21 847 06/29/2010 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1,305 5F $ 1,223,008 88 23 ITEM NUMBER. B-1 0 DATE 08/10/10 57, lei I r 70 �A7A� ERtI.%, Atascadero City Council Staff Report- Community Development Department Title 8 Building Code Text Amendments Title 9 Planning and Zoning Text Amendments PLN 2010-1364 / ZCH 2010-0159 (City of Atascadero) RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission Recommends Council Introduce Draft Ordinance A for first reading, by title only, to approve PLN 2010-1364 (Zone Text Change ZCH 2010-0159) REPORT-IN-BRIEF One the City Council's highest priority goals is to encourage economic development and simplify the entitlement and construction process Staff presented a list of potential code amendments to the City Council on June 8, 2010 Staff has prepared this code text amendment of the Council's highest priority revisions to the City's zoning ordinance and building code The proposed revisions are grouped into the following components • Amend the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) requirements for non-residential development and establish a formal design review process • Increase the minimum size of second units and allow the greater use of manufactured housing • Reduce minimum setback requirements in the multi-family residential zone • Add a "personal services-restricted" land use definition and restrict the location of such services in the City • Revisions and clarifications to the zoning ordinance and building code for consistency with adopted City Council and Department policies, as well as implementing the goals and policies of the General Plan The Planning Commission held a hearing on the proposed amendments on July 20, 2010 and recommended approval to the City Council on a 7-0 vote The Planning Commission's recommended changes were minor and are summarized in the following table 24 m C U C 4) O O E m C cc O o O Q _ O Ncu _0 cu C O m C o a) p -C N 0 m m cc 'O o ccc 0 a m Eo o ccu fl c p- cn in y G N a) 'O E` oo E aa = a� � �oo°' � � • E O N _n n C C N m O N G y Q. U -('p CO -N m O 41 a) � U c V v O G > c — c is a acr uoi cn o m mLL-E a CDc m aci �. 0 o o > a) 0 ° c� E Za a.N c E c 0 0 00 o a) - CL o N •=5 O Q o (D N _p d p o 0 0L aci E - a) c d > >, a > c O U Q) 0 d -N N C O 41G m L U • • • • • C a) — cn p E-,C -0 •O Q m N C C fV Cr Q a) O C d E m d U C', N U) C- d m o- C a) a rn L �O d �c Q�O p p p -� a) c c 3 C d Y O C 5 C O C p a > cn CO cu > cu 3 u� o -2 EU .N c o (D- o m o' m o� E o Cl. U E m rn o E m is o m E o c 0 C) 0 -0 c E o m �i Q p > C -C d V p O d M N fu -WO E N C m -v N N O Q" m cas�' i E d > y aa)) Jit M c co Eo.o = co 3 3 � m o c a) C o0 U E 30 Y •m @ -ca N L, m 3 E cm .cm.. O) o cc O m O 2 a) � a) N _ � cn co °' m o p-'o c o E 3 o c ::3 o cfla aa) aNi c o 'i Cpo � � N-a OU cca o � 0 aU Cl a) C U C o = 0 m -0 y c O i+ aci w @ m 2 V G1 v'rEoRNc Co �ML O O CO b) N h r W ai d O 0 f6 •O✓ W CL N N l0 0 '5 -C m O cc cn O N d Ic O C a a>i m L Q = � � b � .0 m d 0 a) O p U C v li ,X U Z p o ( m W •oa) 'r 6 toE CD o c ca 3 E N = 0 > Z U U O a) cc x d w 25 c) / C) -0 § . 2 § ) _ \ \ E E \# n a ® § 3 E cc n Cc » 2 =%§ a CD E ° G k ® c ■ a E 7 § W E IA '( / / 2 i / 7 a & o \ � \ \ 2 \ teCD e \ \ ( E� \ - k f \ k ) \ k \ 2 k (k \ E G % f 2 w 0 � ma o ° C = 7 \ g a ) 2 n E § - - 2 f % \ \ fw \ � $ x'0 a) � _ \ m § 2 E - - • f \ f § &I § $ \ � \ ■ W 0) k » o < a n o a _ _ U) .� AW � �} �{ } } ( lop j .V .� �} � �} 26 U O C N m w a0. a) y N � a) O i U d m c C, 0 a _ ._ n m w U C Mn N y c cn *a Y O d -0 (D coU T U O U .�■ ca O a "o U U) w w O O m O) �.. C .� E L a) -O O a) U) c E w o E �� >, m � '� a 0 Cc fn � m d N E p a) a) y a) Co �. a) cn m c �° ` c a) .� O Q U) n N a) > `o m m = v cu m c = 3 to = > > to ca in to a) �' N s o L rn umi R m a) m U) 0 — cn -0 CL o U) L) = o m c 41 cdi .S v cco N a 3 ;g Z CD U 3 c U) U .Q j Z' d ami y m a) Z w c a) c U a) = m m a m m a) 0 2 � o E � � a - cn U) Z > cm � _0 m E c c .> � L � Q■ a) ur CL CL�c — ti a) CU o c a) m E a) m - m 'c o O ` m 0 O N O o o m c m m L a c CL y - -O O 3 c d V m .V y o O N Cl C cn EO m m --c—o N � � C L N a) h C m T L>;, fO � It o o a.a a) a) 0) O o � j c a) ;° m N � _ c m iv c a) a; y U) O C � N f0 N U L 'C Q) V! .N-. O U j E p C "." E m CL O d F1 U . X ca n OU d a a) N U —O Cl c1 L d V a) U) Ln G m O cn O N tM y O V O M M m O) Z Cn W 7 .0 a IX d Q1 U "O Cn -G (D N O N m N ~ a) cn E E a) m a c o o U) O -O 41 C N L a) 2 a) O m O U m a) > C O O7 > a) C C m > Umi C m C m N d1 U C > •C L L C '� U m N O m c 0 0 U N a) E N U o O S Q L U CL a) 3 (1)m C E O O to Cl) L — m w m .S v cu cn $ — a) o = Now w c N � o € O 0 CL a) o n e vi E c c` a) o U) ami mp CA v, :C_ c o Z m o m .0 U) U) J :3L •C O T C L N C m -0 -0 •� c o c) a) a) -O O t m e Q) to v 0 U L T U) to C m O) Mn U a) O' N N41 N F— s .Q N .L..� CL LL U U C F— C ++ >, cl-O > C ca a) O cu 0 0 O D c 0)'o VU) v > E n o to a) c d = a) 0 — L m >_ m a) m o H o a) v) cn c Q- rn c 00) rn > m 'c 2) 0 ., m :C c — m : :— ) mo V u a) m m fO m n > c m a) U) CU c 0) > a _ N m N •c N N :3Y C -m0 m .m is E v) 3 O .v m a) cri U) E c CL to C Y �. N W .0 to a O CL 7 .� F 6 = •>� U) 4) �. CL X -� -E - 0) u„ U ca N c m e a) a) c.) cn no m aEi O m m ` ` d O m W a V N U U tan) tan) m O Cn W cNC „ d' 27 -O 0) N V) U O "p0 m N co o a) O .- C` t�j o O u) O '92 aj — C..) - — _ m - CU O O N Cn U � �-+ CO OU •�' `O E a U m O x � C U 'O d CL C n O O x70 a) to .N C O C -0 O O C -p �" C1 m O N LO E cu E a) cu �• a) N 700 N CT N E -0 cu .0 y CD m•� > N 3 0 o c uoi .co. c a) m _ m75 'Q in O c' 3 = a) vi a) m U -0 U C C0.1 C o E a`) Y o m E o � o a CD '� a) d o L� aUi c cu a N ai c° ac c Q? oo w c li .� ov3 >, cE 2 > c` m mp- jo `° o E o 0 co o CL) a d ( u"") vi a) n o o cn v c a _ E w 'a c U m s n m co C O fa a)a% us �O = n Nm T o o o- coa a) �' S o a) ca - p _c c `' 3 Q Q o a) a N c cn W 0 0' 'n ca c c m C CU m m Nvc ~ -0 0 m o cn-119 o_ o -� c c o LE p) E - O cn �' m R .0 C L1 C C f6 ON O C .y Q. ca b n c co o o--- C S E o `o — C U .� o _) -a c c�a o C E c` y O0 U) N E o - U C 0 rn y •CU cu m �+ C- w E d O -a —L) cnQ) a) C � 3 '' 0 C o n C a) cTi�- � � a) 3 0 3 O a) 0E A CU o m � N CL E -_ nC6 a a) co N _> U- .Lpr C > c::, C N n y .p. N n .0 0 o c -0 x) c a> m E 2 a U (D C mao) o m V5 c m ocm E v , a E m > aQc) ca 3 o) 2 m d� Q o Q c n Q a d> D a — s a) c w o mp C > C w C .L.. 0 3 _0 j O ) C- E U a +- O a 3 � O - „�, V O O to O 0 C O o 0 0 N E .�.. C E m Q) C U On C L W a) w E •O -p E ,O) w w 3 cu C U C m C Cn I► IR n u O E p o a) c c ;a c c o ate, >•` N fa F, L N Q -0 0cu -0 m m O E O O +�+ CU a .0 N C 0) .N U C a) - c o 0 0 _> = E E U o U N O r- N cn U 'X n C � CU a) 7 a) C m O C CN U N O) w0 cu 0 _ E > U 'N a) C m O O Ln O .� a) a - O E a) c o 0 w a Lo (ai c Q) m _ N CV UC .0 N CU .X O O U N m CU •� a3 m U •'� Gn m F- a) m O O Y F- O n Cn cn F .0 Jr- 0 O O '• C CU n (B O' (a >+ N O w N o c a U 2 E v a) n•- o Cd _> Ncx (D = x � •V E .E _ _ •E :° o o o.co (D LIE Om N O o) U C a E U ca in -0 ui o 2 N a Q m 3 ' c E m a`� v c o) o c E C O N C O cu p C 0 m C ma — O U N N a C +L-+ O m 0 �No 3Y -a ccn Mit y �' = l) .0mvoa o - is m a) E un) N a) d Q -0 d CU N c C�O > d N c +., in n 30 'x .5 m cn u� Uj ui mt = n o H.."0 V � 07N -0 1 oO � c o �U)) m V d as C 0a--- L WE m CL) c a) E a .c m LL 72 cc cn m 0 � 3 -c-a • c- m vi fm O) U O C C S a1 0 j m j C1 d Q' in N C cn '�t a O fl.fY C E n N 'O O N -O C a) 'O O N a .� yo3 0) :° m ca cu o) n -3amoa Vc) 28 a� � o m ti a) CL) U C m C C m O o C > 'O O O) >' m •� o cn O U �_ uni o N cu 3 3 'E E o � c o o -a Eo -0 rn C— CU a) D "C Q1 O U O` m a) O N a) .0 CL y a) 0 m ca 'O O C a) U > ON rn � -o O) m 0 o U 3 mo .> o o) E o c x a c o C O E rnlogo N v a) c a) o a) c m n o N Y m ,nr m o `o coo ,� U `� E 5 � m U m o v m d' o c c a a E o uoi c o cno me � m o m ca a) - a) c c cn m o o m y a) n 3 N m a) c o $ .N Q o a) ca a) > c a) v U c a`) ' 'O y N C a c a) o imo � t '� co o 0 .� c v cn o cu 0 v >, c d is . n in c m y m n— in x -a N p m e a) U U) — T a) a) op_ m o o -o a) ti :° m $ °� - .N aUi c m m n Q)'O L••• N >, a) C "O � C Q) m 0 C O a) O O O V7 Q N to Co 7 N U E m U '0 m 7 p , > m � m Uco O U m C L a) O C 0 0 m m .c ca .c E "O C O L O 's m a>j h c o v •� is o p m c o o m cn is m o o p j c .G 3 c m c U) .X .c m co o ami N p s c H a) 0 0) 4 a) m m .� :O m a) O m Y m m L m � L.. m > "O y QI N -O d.- n O)L Q N p .0 C E L Q) U C O` d ._ m a) - a) L O L m C. m — C O y "N U U c d a) .O O n O O m IL 3 N c E a) .r 3 v m o �' o w c `CL n rn a vi p Q m c° N c c c na) c 3 °r° E :a Y a) rn o ca o sm E o o a) 3 Cl) Co 3 3 o 0 0 0 a w Y c c V5 in a) u, O °) E -a -o "o Q =o Q Q Q c..) "cn U a) o c`v o 0 W a) n o o w o o o U o o c a)) v o o a .OO N10 c > 'O m O CooU CO > m Q Oa C Q Q = c O a) a) Q) cv N N > N L "N _m N U O N_ c cv N 3 o o 3 -X cn ac) s o o v o m E a) o U 4) N U U C 42 N a) N _E m n N •0 O � ..L... x y � OL-. O U n= O !CD n m H C ` m i6 O cn d C n U) cnm -C C . O (� cu C 3. m -Cu N O a) - - C o O cn c a) () o 3 E _� aci av'i co a m aUi o ac`) a) m m cn E .2 a) _ > co a n m o aCr = o - .- aa)) a c°)) o � `° N :° cn E c a) a) a) cn c a) w -0 $ cn o a) cn > o a) c .S n c a) o o a) o cn w a) o f c .o a) a) gz 04 N N y N O "C C cQ n t a) m to C Qin -•-• to CL CO Cn L f- Cn L O 0) w a) a) m m m a) ' C v m mOO- = w m 'p O C a) cu E a) m E a) "O U C is C co c .� ca lmn -m0 C "C m C is � C C a) o m C p > _> C m p L o 0 0 " E = o u) m n o � .o m c`a m o a) c . E is C U cn N�'- N ui a) C O „U„ is n• a) cn m > 'V m o o L d C E o O E m C uj.� o O a) c �_ a c a) O �' m o m a) u cn N o s c m m m on c) a) = o . 'D G C = '6 c�'`oa 'O fa N - N E O c n ui N m L C d o m .� m `p C L in o f cu N a L " "O C m D 3 N a) N O Co o 4= (D m U N L C 6 O L O Q) C O C c N N 0 O)S A L "O C� � � ..m_- -� U C '_r O m cn a) d� L C � m a) 3 E U C O C o U Y c in p cn - Er a) � � `o cn m c — -5 a) a) Sia a) — w-2 •n 'o 0 'v o o s ate) `` o o m 0 c w 3 aa) cn Q o co W — is o Y X o X o Q E mo m is V iA ca c o a m'� o cTi Eo a , xa C Z' 41 N N O N O U) - O O cn C O p U U D) N O E O _ O L.. 0 0 U C C r O > > Q) N -0 C O (o L p fo N C O l6 "O C N E U L O a O - 0 L 0 ' C a) a 3 •- fo a) •C C y C a) O co 2 e. N a 0 N a cn L E O CD -0 a) d• O O X O • a "O a a) N N a � a Q) n U C � a) CO yL.., C L n N 3 c ns ..- N O fn a) C _- . U C O .+ O >�• O X Co C _ Y' m co 0 3 a) a D a) a) O c a) D c -0 is p a.. co O -c .D D N a a O m N L U)S _ a n o c w c cv a co -a 15a) o C cn a CL cu CCD cu O C C '�O O ui .O d U co •C m d LM C 0 a) 'O p 0) n 0 L '� N `p 7 .y-. N O N a) co N .N N M a j - . -p O p a) CO 7 L U U N LL.,, L O 0 co0 C _ C ` .0 fn O C C a) L 7 o cn CD `d 0 2 CD CD O N C 0 N 'G d d U) (o > •� O C d E '«O' N V N V to.0-. L -. O) U a p m U a U N c a am o c o ca c) o c 0 m > voi c w w E N c N L a ■.',L fo co C U N �y �' :i+ 0) .O 0 O ` N Y a) 'O .0 U "D = p Voi p Y N o c c cn E0_ cm a)U) n °) c a) ac cn E a) c a) m U) - E cn cn a) N N O N C N co � L m U)i � —� 5 axi H Q N O m w U Q L. Q m U p� s a c Cc w o °) a to N as a) cLn c a) o vi N c w co o m a E O • • • • • • coi v a a 0 p O -00 C Co <; 3 o a v C6of a ns v aCU ov CU a) co c Q C O U 0 0 An N o N 'n rnV C O d •N C cn N m U cu a a) a C -- m p O N N U n L E U N C n 0 ■■■.; •C U X O a f6 V co Z+ a) >, o U 7E5 O to .0 a) C caL N U p L (6 L n ca E c '" E 3 0 3 _ O.C CX U C p N M a -o E in CU cn O cn N C U d axi ou a a) co m a a s o)v > 0) a) v m o �_ c o O 3 Z as Z a`> 2 n ri `. .. a) d p Y N ,N... C C d O Z' O ..0. (� d N a) C) CM a) 2 O p C O T upi N m >. au)) �' rn coy N in a L 3 0 n v .E o y c = o v i Ta C m .:s a 0 0 R 0 m M cn ` m y 7 � v '2 ' 0).y,, O N 0 7 a) N N 0 0 0 co U N fo 0 U O -0 0 m U 0 C ' m Q 0 c CCO cU E d cfo p 0000 •n 0 U a) p }.`.■. cma) in oB 0om nQmU) -'_D a) vci LN a) O.aoi o c Q > N 0 EV COO O cYrn Unc�.> 3 , ) - n a) 00 aas E > o •D oa) CD Q c � o c a) on vc W- n`°'N -0 aa2 =° d E vco o °) vmyaiaci CP a cn N 0 L) aNU) w o r co 0oE oQo OO ON U) a .2, N cn n U Oa -o E w (i 0) 3 cn u > a) 200 iO n m r na - u) •bZ a) ), x N E co a a) io o co U) o c �o U n a) cn c o 0 CL— n (6 O_.2 cu cn m `-... cn) ) US C6 H N in in y U) �. N co .0 .N V N N �y.� 30 m c m N a� U (D O) C N NC v, o cn a) m `m w c o a) U U a) c 'E c u+ cn -� 2 •E a- m Cc u' ` cn a) t U E a) o 'S E E f w c COcr O) C •' cn a) Q a) a) 'c `o mo � 0 0 d; m a, a ca O cO U �; m co a) C v n o v E E o) — m c 2 q LU e o f cc IL cn w c O N C O m Ucn > O-L m C a) 0 a) a) 0 a) _ C O U m >` C C U O cu 0 cu -0 v (A E +=� N c r i 4 'D O U -Do �p E Qin Qr mO U � M LU � a) E cn CD CIO L ¢ U ca ,TCD L N a) U C G) N O C 3 Y O a) o a a) m N f° U a c 3 co m o `rMl N — m T is U D ,.. N U � •� U) = C C N C c o c E a) a) (Oj O , m a) E N •C U O a) f w0 C C a) a) F— cu U1 O U d cn m a) a) a .- Eo m c` ami rn U cca 7 E O C M a) Qw •� N N C " -. ai a) m rn o m ca .E aa) A "a CO �_ -� N Y QI V U °) N m a) o• a) c a) N o o Y cn E o 3 cn a) c c o 41 m w m U u) m o a) v o cD -o : c o m V -0 p > a) = m iii m o O d T� - U L T O Q d U ca m U m m m o mom m s rn x _ v m c L • L E L N O m y ,c ~ O '- T c7) a) 'n N s c •m p v) p '_ �, o c V ¢ o ccU m v-ti o W CM cui E y m m E c OC O v U v a) O .0 L O X o) N - m -0 C an U a) 40 31 R U tD L 3 rn ca m G y a 0 a 0 Ucc CN ay .L-• i31 p N C '� GO toll N 0 d C U U C d C .00 0 U V w d O w G 'O [6 U w N ' 00 CD CG rC U N U CO .fl r CG6 N cc l6 O U:d G ca r '17 •0 CO O 0 to CD N d O U O 3 Q R3 C N U N N Q p 0 to O w 0 N Q O dO O Y N ..O L 0 N L w > N u 0 r -0 N Q O Ea 3 to N o M °' E cm 41. c W 72 a o o 3' E Q Q to G0 " � U O O C co 0 (D U p) 0 E V .�',.m U 0 +� p 6� O to w 0 t4 C L .0 A. 0 Q co .-• LA o cn c� tD w ca o c w cc G co N cD o >E o G m N to o Y) Ta 9a Go o f ai cc) W CT) cL C/) w W C CA c N r C3� b O (n � •3 ind C GO N 0 C j in d O N L NC OY co O tT --I-- N o 03 �•- 'in m Q U N (d tT .L. �' d CO 06, w C 0 O C O N 3 C G O •p C Cn E N N 'C C caN a7 N N (4 O co w G N U rC 7 G p w O O C Un w y = E -O G .✓ tll 'j p N N H O d 3: 7 V "a G tD 't6 111 G w E vi — c tD op ca m N c- N N tD tD 0 y ca �:. d N N 0 wo N Dn G T7 U L C w a) C („) w d'G co TS b 0 N S-• O 7 C 0 +C. C ?� N O CJS Q L.. 'CS .E 7 .X16 CO C t4 C w O CCS) fa 7 •v-0 w O N 'E r p !- •G y cr O ton d 0 0 cp 0 c, P �- .G .t7 _76 CD 0 N d N tD O O G U @ M C a co F- co N U'w 0 *-- w tt7 Ctl -O N O c6 rc N 0 o C Cc y > d a> ti a m 0aa) y o c tD tD _ o f w CO R to p L y y L w U N Y 0 t7) N 7 Q M O CC 0 O _ 'H Q E o w Q 3 a) to a aGi � 3 c`s u, � •N d ° c � = o s 3 a) ca � ' _ c E j5 "b► -C 7) 0 V N 0 O C 7 0 �. CD d N N S] .r .� ?� y U C C ti a5 N o y m tD ON ai m a>co (na rn L c _ cc y W . c fA A p y c°n' > fl s� o 0 a.C C G 3 E 3 w C s ca a u 0 s m o o w N u o a> ani c6 ui m � o �o ? y = mn tD N G 3 w � C�3 0 �- M= 4 0 0 0 L '"' w N t0 > C U G tD O ca d 0 Go r' o n r°, ca Q L 6 c cn o -a w E 0 -a u 3: o 'er 0 �- o m :° o p — o is E 'in �' '> i N n'a w wa n`> > °' c d o o a � o tD ? 'v y c C O a? O r + Q C 0 t1 O Cl) C6 �•- N .a N ca C W cn II�..� C U N w f6 Q tD u CO C6 ..L-• .4 0 0 CO (CS CD J rC d C -a C Q i O X f to N O cn G C (d' ` 6> N E LO m r 0 d U 0 G Co m � ': C` -O C tD O U Co C 'l7 co.. L1G C O co ce)d OD N R+=CO 0 w U UCZ ¢ O- O G N Nd r W; r > a� a w r C 3 3 L N U N y Q Co 0 0 0 0 ~ r r O r c cn y d y0- ti vOi a U ii y d c L o N c0 N d p "O C c cc f0 U d V r- R N L•' O O r d h 0 d CO ` N > {O _ w ++ c62 .L.+ .� Q C N _ y c6 •p U C ._ C o d c = O C O O_ N w O d C O y L G C. '.. Q'— � c0 d � O � ,: c0 E E 01 C O in A2V p .3 �; O w �- � c .` N c .L, m 0 V as E a L O 41, p U W chi tOt O G O W .S. C9 CC N N N N Q,. d c6 C. Cf Z N -NO L O W C G - N p O .0 -O O t) O C N E a) 0) m E ai mm is •N O N O o O tO.f cNp c0 C .+ O y, d a pQ O N E O Q O N c N r ..Ln O`.. O N � ti V O N U •E R c Q w E i0 d O 'a O� N 3: -P O tm n 0 R p > "O .� O c G U EO U m O` ` d r =`O O m C G d V 410 •C C. w R cG O N O d c6 L .� p w Nd C� o O N 7N O E -a N O � ° _ O tr O ' C O C c cm E 3 O .0 U L p N E O U C O N O O C N C- O N O U E d c6 C N O E O 0 3 > cn O c c n c c > G c ca m m 0 a d o 7 C N ca O d cd .L-. ` NO c c a� is a� N E o CCD Q N L E . O E ._ cn N c N O = P E C O 'O > A q� O1 N � Z � con05 -0 N � "O C 0 U C -p _ 3 C cc cu C p c 0. N O O -0 N Q O N LL to C O E N N m CM c 0 0U .N.. O C- O 2 E C d O N = E a� E E N N N C N O N a o N m c is 0- a > o W cA o m 3 cu 0 c cn a) � m m v o in d cmc Zn C Ncu (O W — C 0 7 N N L N o cn E - o cu = E W > cd c x c a) N cn C C. N d+ U CL... C V E M C. •3 to E p .N c 0 O N 0 7 � N d L 7 O L D m c c N U c .. 3 O (4,100 � is N N ccci E r -.e Q y G L 1,, c L - cn c c o f6 n O - •Ei c U cn _ °� v c c Cu p .O `o r� a`� env O a � � � � � 03 O y = .Y L w � m m a) m v E co m co �' O• s p f- V p r' E �' N_ .N C O C M d O N '►- L v :Im cn -0L O C C N cn c CD N 07 E cod C co ` N C c NO O y N w C fB (C N N O p o LO 'O C N C N o d Q M L .�.�- L N Ci m N E Z L E - = o c U m a to m w n E E `- o � _0 cz ca,n >'L.r C 1- C•C L ~ C N N ..0_. .0 0 7 N X s E o v'E v> Q E o c> Q > > in U cn rn co .6 .- W N M d 33 a o ° ai E m rn c•v ca E n � �_ " C:, m o o. m p E N N O 0 cn O O O O O E w to C N c r om fA R R a) N p y s N 'I O O O V m O O �■ ` •i aOj d1 E ■+ d w dcuw 'a 'O > y > O Qf td la uS C a) c o O -. h 3 va a) C, $ rn 7 O d O = " M R C E N C — C " O V w N U t0 •C ° d N . Q N d i w h C Q d N V x -0 w o o c a >+ 3 3 CU o y s ecv c 3 c d W O NCL C U) O E c •2. E U= 3 (D �a o a) n a) CL m a' o o CL Cv ° InE 5:E; N = O N vt � i 'O C O w, 'y N .� .N ` w C M d y N N w O M C6Q c uj N 3o E co a c a) v) C:, � o E O vi (n aD '3 a cn M:' v rn = c c vi .; a' Yo ° N y E 30 c CO f6 .� C a to c .x N0 -- CL -- L_ N E a�in (q U m 0 v 'a m c w _ -0 O lC N O - Op UE O L N M :5O W..'O C d V N O•O i.1 N R C N E a�j O.� G w — V O A C71 ` !a y N d o m L_ d co o 0 E as cm c `° G) Hoa c dCD O o a� 3 _ U) E � C N ry m E M Q C6 3 d ■ V 34 DISCUSSION Summary: The Planning Commission on July 20, 2010 recommended PLN 2010-1364/ ZCH 2010- 0159 to the City Council for approval with the following recommended changes 1 Recommend change to proposed section 9-2.107 (b)(3) to have an at large member be open to any resident of the City as opposed to an at large member that is a "qualified design professional" The recommendation reads as follows One (1) at large member resident of the City This at large member shall be a resident of the City_ and be a Ejualified design rfe fessfo al if a design fa f s »Ρal is .,n.,.,.,ilable theirThe C►tv Council shall geese-appoint an at large member tha4 west f4s the intent efat its discretion to serve on the Design Review Committee 2 Recommend change to article 29 section 9-3 701 for the proposed "personal services-restricted" land use definition to be more encompassing The recommendation reads as follows Personal Services-Restricted Service establishments that may have a blighting and/or deteriorating effect upon the surrounding area which may need to be dispersed in order to minimize their adverse impact. Examples of these uses include the following but not limited to check cashing and/or pay day/same day loans, fortune tellers, psychics, palm, tarot and card readers, tattoo and body piercing services pawn shops to which the business of pawn brokering, or the business of lending money upon personal property, pawns or pledges is done, and hot tubs and saunas that are not an accessory to the primary use. 3 Recommend change to section 9-4 109 to remove the word "principal" from the code section The recommendation reads as follows (a) Accessory Buildings. An accessory building is to be located no closer than six (6) feet from any pr-fnerpal-building or as required by the building code. (b) Residential Buildings. A pr-i-neipal-residential building(including a multifamily dwelling) is not to be located closer than ten (10) feet to another pFHie+pa4-building (residential or non-residential) 4 Recommend change to section 9-5 020 Guesthouse definition to clarify that a bathroom is permitted The recommendation reads as follows (c) Guesthouse. Guesthouses are defined as residential occupancy construction (R) with a full bathroom, no kitchen or cooking facilities regardless of number or configuration of rooms and are the same as second units for the purposes of defining use and calculating fees 5 Recommend change to section 9-6 142 (4) manufactured homes widths smaller 35 than 15 feet may be approved with Design Review Committee approval The recommendation reads as follows (4) Manufactured homes shall have a minimum width of fifteen (15) feet. Manufactured homes with widths less than fifteen (15) feet may be permitted with approval by the Design Review Committee 6 Recommend change to section 9-7113 (b) clarifying that a certificate of compliance (coc) shall be issued prior to the City recognizing that a lot is legal The recommendation reads as follows (b) The lot has,errs been issued eligible �a certificate of compliance or a conditional certificate of compliance (Ord. 68 § 9-7 113, 1983) Staff recommends the following changes based on additional research that staff was directed by the Planning Commission and the Atascadero Fire Department. 7. Recommend removal of section 9-6 142 b (8) manufactured homes because the City is no longer required to perform this service The State of California Housing and Community Development has rules in place regarding surrendering of registration The recommendation reads as follows indieia. if any of these items afe not available, the ownef shall subffitt te4he-G� tha4 these iteffis afe mfssing or lest. When the fflobfiehome is new and has flever- been fegister-ed with the Department of Motor Vehieles, the owner shall stibmit to the r" statement f+em the FAebileheme dealer-selling the mebileheme stating that the mobil ,a Jh been registered. •..vv..valV lllV au new v� l,tl llA 114J never 7-8. Recommend the following revisions to section 8-3 101 of the Building Code exemptions The Atascadero Fire Department requested additional language to clarify when fire sprinklers are needed for additions The recommendation reads as follows Exception 1 . Group R, Division 3 occupancies where the total combined floor area will not exceed 3,000 square feet(278 7 mz) 4--2. Group B and.M occupancies whenever single or multiple additions will not exceed 1,000 square feet(92.9 mz) beyond the size of the structure on the effective date of this repulation or the total combined floor area will not exceed 5,000-square feet(464 S mil and a second story or heater is not added, and the occupancy is not changed to a more hazardous use 36 Analysis. 1 Conditional Use Permit(CUP) requirements The City's zoning ordinance identifies additional review necessary for certain development applications The City requires a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for uses conditionally permitted in a zone, as well as for multi-family residential developments of twelve (12) or more units and non-residential developments with more than ten thousand (10,000) square feet of building or outdoor storage area, even if such a developments are listed as an allowable use in a particular zoning district. These additional CUP requirements require additional entitlement for uses that are "allowed" in the zoning ordinance such as small banks, drug stores, and other smaller commercial uses that exceed more than 10,000 square feet. This additional entitlement may add additional expenses to uses deemed an economic benefit to the City The intent of this policy is to give City Council members and Planning Commissioners a greater role in approving non-residential projects By adopting the Design Review Committee and giving the committee a stake in enhancing the appearance and development of the City, the need for a review for small, non-residential development may no longer be warranted Staff and Planning Commission is recommending that larger, non-residential projects, including outdoor storage facilities should still require a CUP (e g shopping centers with anchors such a supermarket, drugstore and satellite retail pads, "big box" retail establishments and impound lots) because these projects may impact the quality of life in Atascadero Staff recommends that non-residential developments containing more than 50,000 square feet (sf) or more of building footprint should require a CUP These developments at more than 50,000 sf tend to be the larger, neighborhood oriented shopping centers / plazas that begin to draw more issues associated with quality of life impacts, and therefore should be more closely scrutinized by both the Planning Commission and City Council 37 Proposed Text Change: 9-2.109 Conditional Use Permit. The conditional use permit is the process used to review land use proposals of a nature or magnitude which could significantly affect their surroundings. Such land use proposals include (i) Uses that are shown as conditional uses in a particular zoning district; or (ii) Multiple-family residential developments consisting of twelve (12) or more units, even if such a development is listed as an allowed use in a particular zoning district; or (iii)-Nenr-esidefifial developments eentaining ten thousand (10,000) squafe feet or-fRefe a building of at4deer-star-age afea, even if stieh a development is listed as an allowable use in a pal4tetfl nb . dist iet ' (iii)----Nonresidential development containing,fifty-thousand(50,0 square feet or more of building footprint area, even if such a development is listed as an allowable use in a particular zoning district; or —...(Iv)----- Outdoor commercial_and_industrial sales a'n'd.storage developments._as defined by 9-9., 102. of ten thousand (10,000) square feet or more, even if such a development is listed as an allowable use in a articular zoning district. 38 2. Establishment of Design Review Committee . Staff is proposing the establishment of a Design Review Committee (DRC) The DRC would provide formal appearance review that is currently performed at the staff level for projects that require an appearance review, as well as additional projects that require additional entitlements such as a Conditional Use Permit, Precise Plan and other types of development consistent with the City's General Plan The DRC would be similar to an architectural review commission and consist of members from both the City Council and Planning Commission and a design professional from the Community that would serve as an "at large member" The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that this "at large member" not be limited as a member with design experience, but rather be a member appointed by the Council at its discretion The DRC would ensure high quality design of projects that fosters unity and cohesiveness in Atascadero The DRC would give the City Council and Planning Commission members a greater control over the architectural standards of the community The DRC would meet as a committee The committee will have a standing meeting time once a week and will meet as necessary The Community Development Director will inform the committee of a meeting to take place one week ahead of time The Director will provide information to the committee and the applicant is invited to participate The committee will meet to discuss the design and appearance of the project only and make a decision on the project's appearance The applicant is informed of the decision through a correspondence, as well as conditions of approval based on the outcome of the committee's meeting The applicant may appeal a decision of the Design Review Committee to the Planning Commission if no additional discretionary permit is sought. This appeal will be similar to an appeal to the City Council if a project is denied by the Planning Commission Proposed Text Change: 9-2.107 Design Review Committee. (a) Purpose. The Design Review Committee is established to implement the goals and policies of the General Plan. The intent is to ensure that the physical design of new development meets the following obiectives. (l) Maintaining the rural character and identity of Atascadero. (2) Enhancing the appearance and character of the City, by reviewing the architecture and site plans for commercial, office, industrial. large single family residential and multi-family residential projects, 39 (3) Ensuring that development is compatible with surrounding uses and improvements by requiring building designs that provide appropriate visual appearance and site plans to mitigate neighborhood impacts. (b) Design Review Committee—Composition.The City Council shall appoint tine Design Review Committee. The Design Review Committee shall consist of the following: (1) Two (_2)members of the City Council, (2) Two(2) members of the Planning Commission, (3) One (1) at large member resident of the City. This at large member shall be a resident of the City. The City Council shall appoint an at large member at its discretion to serve on the Design Revienv Committee. (c) Terms of Service. The Design Review Committee members from the City Council and Planning Commission shall serve a two (2)year term. This service term shall commence at the date of appointment The at large member resident shall have a service term of two(2) years. This term shall begin at the date of appointment by the City Council. (d) Authority. The Design Review Committee has the authority to approve and make recommendation in regards to the architectural appearance, signage site plan and landscape plan of the following projects. (1) All Multi-faintly Residential projects. (2) All non-residential rojects including: commercial, office, mixed-use, and industrial developments). (3) All Public Facilitvprojects and buildings. (4) Development in an open space zoning district. (5) Any residential single family residential development requesting a planned development permit. (6) Development projects requiring a precise plan refer to chapter 9-2.108). (e) Meeting. The Design Review Committee shall convene once a week, as needed. This meeting shall consist of the Committee the Community Development Director, pertinent city staff members and the applicant. tf Appearance Review Approval The Design Review Committee shall take into consideration the following criteria in either approving the design of a project or making recommendations for projects that.require Planning Commission approval. The DesiLT, Review Committee may require or recommend additional conditions of approval. The following is a list of criteria that the Design Review Committee shall take into consideration. (1) The goals and policies established by the General Plan, 40 (2) Guidelines and standards for development set forth by the Appearance Review Manual, ' (3) The proposed development plan is compatible with, and is not detrimental to surroundjRg land uses and improvements provide appropriate visual appearance. (g) Determination. (1) The Community Development Director shall provide the applicant with correspondence regarding the outcome of the meetiiig, including any additional conditions of approvals that is required or recommended by the Committee. (h) Compliance. All requirements imposed by Design Review Committee shall be incorporated into a building permit and completed prior to permit final. Failure to comply with the requirements of Development Review Committee constitutes a violation of this code. (i) Appeals. Appeals of decisions from the Design Review Committee shall be made to the Planning Commission and filed within 15 days of the Design Review Committee s decision. Any additional appeals shall be consistent with section 9-1.111 of this chapter. If the Design Review Committee cannot reach a decision on a.design review issue the Committee may refer this issue to the Planning Commission. 3. Land use definition for "Personal Services" update and codification of "Personal Services-Restricted"with related update of definitions for consistency purposes Based on direction received from the City Council, staff was asked to review the land use descriptions of personal services and how the City can limit certain types of uses such as tattoo parlors, body piercing, check cashing and fortune telling Residents and Council members have expressed concern that these types of personal services may create a blighting condition when concentrated in neighborhoods The existing zoning allows "personal" services in many commercial zones throughout the City either as an allowable use or through a CUP Staff proposes the following revisions be made to the zoning ordinance similar to other cities in the County that reflect restrictions in the "personal services" category because of the potential neighborhood blighting these uses may create The following revisions to the zoning ordinance are proposed to clarify the personal services definition, bring consistency with the City's Adult Oriented Business and separate those uses that may induce blight. 41 Proposed Text Change: 9-3.701 Purpose. (Article 29 Land Use descriptions) Personal Services. Service establishments primarily engaged in providing non-medical services generally involving the eafe of the per-son whieh are not medioally related, as a primary use and may include accessory retail sales of products related to the services provided. These uses include the followin- beauty shops (inchides permanent makeup when less than 10% of overall sales),and barber shops, beauty a-ad barber- shops; day spas and massage therapy where each massage therapist is licensed by the State, shoe repair shops, saunas and het tubs, dry cleaning pickup stores and small seale dfy ,leaner-s without pielaip and del' �^ � clothing rental, dating and eseei4 seiwiees tailors, tanning salons, and, -and- efiv lies petogr oming services. To coincide with the revisions of the "personal services" definition, a new definition is proposed for personal services that may be blight inducing This category includes uses such as tattoo parlors, body piercing, check cashing and other similar uses that "may have a blighting and/or deteriorating effect upon the surrounding area which may need to be dispersed in order to minimize their adverse impact." These uses are restricted to certain zoning districts in the City The "personal services-restricted" use would be an "allowed" use in the Commercial Services (CS) zoning district and would be a conditional use in the Commercial Retail (CR), Commercial Park (CPK) and Commercial Tourist (CT) The "personal services- restricted" would be prohibited in residential zones, Commercial Professional (CP) and Commercial Neighborhood (CN) zoning district. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council a modification to the definition to allow staff flexibility in uses that are defined in the definition The Commission recommends the insertion of"and not limited to" to provide this flexibility Proposed Text Change: 9-3.701 Purpose. (Article 29 Land Use descriptions) Personal Services-Restricted. Service establishments that may have a blighting and/or deterioratinfz effect upon the surrounding area which may need to be dispersed in order to minimize their adverse impact. Examples of these uses include the but not limited to the following: check cashing and/or pay day/same day loans, fortune tellers, psychics; palm, tarot and card readers; tattoo and body piercingservices, pawn shops to which the business of pawn brokering, or the business of lending money upon personal propene, pawns or pledges is done; and hot tubs and saunas that are not an accessory to the a permitted use. With the redefining of "personal services" staff is proposing a clarification in the "sexually oriented business" definition for massage parlors This clarification is intended to differentiate between a "day spa" as defined by the proposed "personal services" definition and massage parlors 42 Proposed Text Change: 9-3.701 Purpose. (Article 29 Land Use descriptions) Sexually Oriented Business Any business defined by the Atascadero Sexually Oriented Business Ordinance (see Chapter 5-10 of this Code) as an adult arcade, adult bookstore, adult novelty store, adult video store, adult cabaret, adult motel, adult motion picture theater, adult theater, massage parlor (excluding State Licensed massage therap , , sexual encounter establishment, or nude model studio is a sexually oriented business. 4 Land use definition for"recycling and scrap" Recycling and scrap uses have evolved over the years to more sophisticated operations since this definition was created Scraping and recycling now comes in the form of indoor or outdoor uses, and may include a variety of materials ranging from common household items such as aluminum to copper, paper product wastes and recycling operations involving automobiles These newer uses may present a conflict with existing neighborhoods Staff is proposing to redefine this definition to include impound lots, and other outdoor uses that may be detrimental when located adjacent to residential neighborhood and to keep these uses together to utilize special use regulations found in chapter 6 Proposed Text Change: 9-3.701 Purpose. (Article 29 Land Use descriptions) Roeyeling and Ser-a^ Storage, Recycling and.Dismantling of Vehicles and Material. Establishments primarily engaged in the storage, assembling, '' fe dismantling, sorting, tempor-aFy storage and distribution of materials,equipment and vehicles. This use maybe located either outdoors or indoors. Includesfeeyelable or sable ^ and waste materials but is not limited to,auto wrecking yards, vehicle storage areas, vehicle impounds lots,recyclable/waste material storage and transfer facilities. This does, ineluding auto eekers engaged in dismantli ^ not include waste disposal sites,which are separately defined or.-Dees net fne-lude temporary storage of toxic or radioactive waste materials 43 5. Modification of front setback in Residential Multi-family(RMF)Zoning District The 25 foot front yard setback is inconsistent with the City's objective to maximize density and is inconsistent with many of the infill PD standards Staff is proposing a change to the front setback for the residential multi-family zone as well as residential uses in commercial and industrial zones Proposed Text Change: 9-4.106 Front setbacks. (a) A, RS, RSF, and LSF an Zones and Residential Uses in r^.,,mer-eial ^ ' ind str al Zones All residential uses t fnd ste dwellings al and nd "+"al uses shall have a minimum front setback of twenty-five (25) feet, except as follows O RMF Zone and residential uses in commercial and industrial zones. All residential units Shall have a minimum setback of fifteen (15)feet. All garages shall have a minimum front setback of twenty (20) feet. 6. Clarification of Interior Setbacks and Open Areas Staff proposes a clarification of interior setbacks and open area code section This clarification includes minimum building separation, consistent with the California Building Code, and exemptions to interior setbacks for better use by staff, residents, and developers whom review the code for development projects The Planning Commission recommends removing the term "principal" from the ordinance, as this may be confusing in the code's interpretation Proposed Text Change: 9-4.109 Interior setbacks and open areas. Detached buildings located on the same site are to be separated as follows. (a) Accessory Buildings. An accessory building is to be located no closer than six(6)feet from any principal building or as required by the building code (b) Residential Buildings.A pray residential building(including a multifamily dwelling) is not to be located closer than ten(10)feet to another building(residential or non- residential). , whiehe (c) Exemptions The following accessory structures are exempt from the provisions outlined in this section. (1) Decks 44 (2) Patio covers and landscape structures (3) Structures under 120 square feet when exempt from a building permit based on adopted building code and consistent with the standards set forth in 9-6.106(b)(3) (4) Similar accessory structures as determined by the Community Development Director. (ed) Nonresidential Buildings Set by the Building Code (Ord. 68 § 9-4 109, 1983) 7 Clarification and Modification of Chapter 5 Residential Second Units Staff has adopted official department policies in regards to the development and use of second units on single family lots These policies include regulation of studios, wetbars, the use of workshops and garages and unconditioned spaces These policies are available to the public, however they typically surface during the permit review process and are currently not codified With this update, staff proposes to codify these policies In addition, staff is proposing to increase the allowed size of a second unit to the maximum size allowed by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), which is 1,200 square feet (sf) regardless of lot size This would encourage existing homeowners to take advantage of larger size second units, as well as assist in contributing to the City's affordable housing stock. Planning Commission recommended a text change to section 9-5 020 (c), Guest Houses, clarifying that a bathroom is permitted Proposed Text Change: 9-5.020 Definitions. As used in this chapter- (a) Primary Unit.A primary unit is a single-family dwelling unit on a single-family residential zoned legal lot of record. All other uses and structures on said lot shall be accessory to the primary unit. (b) Second Unit. Second residential units are defined as residential occupancy constructions (R) with a kitchen and full bathroom that is accessory to the primary unit and intended for permanent occupancy by a second household. (c) Guesthouse Guesthouses are defined as residential occupancy construction(R)with a full bathroom,no kitchen or cooking facilities and a full bat4feem regardless of number or configuration of rooms and are the same as second units for the purposes of defining use and calculating fees. (d) Granny Unit. Granny units are defined as residential occupancy construction(R)with a kitchen and a full bathroom and are the same as second units for the purposes of defining use and calculating fees 45 (e) Detached Accessory Structure A detached accessory structure is a structure located on a NOW residential lot occupied by a primary unit, exclusive of second units (f) Office/Art Studios. Studios are defined as any type of residential occupancy construction (R) with no kitchens, no overnight stays, cooking facilities and/or no bathing facilities (one(1)water closet is permitted) Studios shall be limited to four hundred fifty(450) square feet. Studios greater than four hundred fifty(450) square feet shall be considered second units. Deed restrictions shall be required for any proposed studio with a.water closet limiting the use of the studio. (g) Workshops and Garages. Workshops and garages are defined as utility occupancy constructions(U)with no kitchens, no cooking facilities and/or no residential occupancy requirements (i.e Title 24) A utility bathroom with shower or any other plumbin.r may be installed with a deed restriction that limits the buildings use to nonresidential purposes.-.5'�tatq-qpproKed wood burning Appliances are-permissible. Attached structures may be permitted consistent with 9-5 060 and 9-6.106. (h) Residential Additions.Residential additions(additions)are defined as an increase of habitable floor area to a primary residential unit.Additions shall have a continuous, logical internal connection without deers-of conditioned space that provides for access to all portions of the primary unit and addition. Doors may not be used to create two separate living spaces The addition shall not have a secondary kitchen,however a wet bar is permissible as defined by 9-� 0?0 (j) Additions must have a minimum 10-foot of shared common wall.A breezeway or similar roof connection of unenclosed or unconditioned space regardless of length shall not be considered to be a residential addition °err► (i) Recreational Vehicle Recreational vehicles are defined as any vehicle, coach, camper, travel trailer, boat, or similar movable residential facility that does not have a permanent foundation. Recreational vehicles are not permitted to be used as any type of second unit or residential accessory use. (Ord. 454 § 3 (part), 2004) (i) Wet Bar.A wet bar is defined as a small counter equipped with a sink for running water consistent with the following: (]).A wet bar does not include a stove built in microwave dishwasher,.or garbage disposal. (2)A gas line shall not be installed in proximity to a wet bar Q)..A wet bar sink shall have.a single trap drain size limited to 1 '/z-inches maximum (4)A wet bar shall include a.counter with a maximum eight foot(8') length and not to exceed 24 square feet of total counter space. (k) Any deviations from the above standards may be approved by the Planning Commission throuigh the issuance of a.Conditional Use Permit. 46 Proposed Text Change: 9-5.060 Development standards. Second units shall be subject to all development standards of the RS, RSF-Z, LSF-Z, RSF-Y, LSF-Y, RSF-X, or LSF-X zoning districts and/or planned development overlay districts in which the property is located, except as modified in this section. (a) Floor Area. The total floor area of a second unit shall not exceed eight hun fed (onm squar-e feet on lots with a iiet area of 0.5 aer-es of less. The total flear-afea of a seeand tinit shall ne exeeed-one thousand-two hundred(1,908200) square feet an lets with ^ net afea gfeatef than 0.5 Refes All development on a lot, including second units, must conform to the development standards of the underlying zoning district, including, but not limited to, setbacks, building separations, maximum lot coverage, grading limitations, and native tree preservation (b) Height. Second units shall conform to the height limits of the underlying zoning district. (c) Setbacks. A second unit shall maintain the setbacks required in the underlying zoning district for a primary dwelling. Detached second units shall not be considered as detached accessory buildings for the purpose of determining setbacks. (d) Building Separations.A minimum separation of ten (10)feet shall be maintained between the primary dwelling and a detached second unit. (e) Off-street Parking. Off-street parking for the second unit shall be provided as follows and in addition to any required parking for the primary unit: (1) One (1) covered parking spot for the first bedroom An additional uncovered or covered parking spot is required for any additional bedrooms One eevered,off street-parlangsPAee, shall be , (2) The off-street parking spaces for second units must be on a paved surface; measure ten (10)feet in width if covered,nine(9) feet in width if uncovered, and twenty(20)feet in depth, tandem spaces may be approved for second units, (3) Parking spaces for second units may not occupy driveways and back-up areas that serve garages for the primary dwelling, nor may they occupy circular drives or hammerhead turnarounds that serve the primary unit(which are intended to provide means by which vehicles can enter a street head- first), (4) Parking spaces for second units may occupy areas for required rear and interior side yards, (5) Primary dwellings with three (3) car garages may allow one (1)bay and the driveway space in front of the bay to be used for a second unit off-street parking; 47 (6) If the lot takes access from a collector or arterial street, as designated in the circulation element of the general plan,parking for second units shall be designed so that vehicles exit forward into the street. (f) Unconditioned Spaces. Structures such as garages and workshops attached to second units Shall be accessory to the second residential unit and shall be limited to an additional 500 square feet. Any additional unconditioned space in excess of 500 square feet or any garage area not provided with direct interior access to the second unit, shall no longer be considered accessory to the second residential unit. (gf) The total maximum amount of paving for parking for both the primary and second unit in a front setback is fifty percent(50%)of the front yard setback area. (hg) Architectural Design. The design of the second unit shall be compatible with the design and scale of the primary dwelling(using substantially the same landscaping, color, materials and design on the exterior) Qh) Private Open Space Requirement. A second unit shall have a minimum private open space area of two hundred fifty(250)square feet.This required open space shall not be located within a required front yard setback.No portion of an open space area shall have a dimension of less than ten(10)feet in width. Gi) Attached Second Units. If the second unit is attached to the primary dwelling, each shall be served by separate outside entrances. The interior wall(s)of an attached unit which separate it from the main unit shall be fire-rated according to the most recent U44emaBuilding Code. (Ord. 454 § 3 (part), 2004) 8. Clarification and Consistency of Residential Accessory Structures Staff is proposing clarification and consistency of residential accessory structures that require a building permit. Codification of this exemption will assist staff and residents with clarity on what types of structures are exempt from a building permit and bring the AMC consistent with the California Building Code Proposed Text Change: 9-6.106 Residential accessory uses. The standards of this section apply to the specific types of residential accessory structures listed. Agricultural accessory structures for the keeping of animals are subject to Section 9-6 112. (a) Swimming Pools. Swimming pools, including hot tubs, spas, and related equipment,may be located within any required side or rear setback, provided that they are no closer than eighteen(18) inches to a property line(additional setbacks maybe required by UgGthe adopted building code), and provided that they are fenced as required by Section 9-6 128 (b) Detached Accessory Structures Any detached accessory structure intended for residential accessory uses and accessory storage: 48 (1) Limits on Use An accessory structure may be constructed or used solely for noncommercial hobbies or amusements, for maintenance of the principal structure or yards, for artistic endeavors such as painting, photography or sculpture; maintenance or mechanical work on vehicles owned or operated by the occupants, for an approved home occupation, or for other similar purposes. (2) Floor Area. The gross floor area of a detached accessory structure is not to exceed fifty percent(50%)of the gross floor area of the principal structure. (3) Residential accessory structures 120 square feet or less are exempt from requiring a permit if the structure is incidental to the primary use and meets the following requirements. (i) The structure does not create a nuisance, (ii) The use of the structure is permitted under its zoning (iii) The structure meets therp operty s rear and side yard minimum setback re uirement of three(3)feet if the structure less than twelve (12) feet in height, (iv) If the structure is more than twelve(12)feet in height, standard setback shall be required re#,ardless of exemption, (V) The accessory structure is located outside of the required front yard setback; NO A minimum six(6) feet of separation is required between accessory structures regardless of exempt onyunteSs._otherwise noted by the adopted building code. If the_acc.essory structures have less than a six (6) foot setback, the a��g_re_szate area of the buildmgs shall be considered one (1) building and shall require a building permit. (34) Number of Structures. The number of accessory structures requiring a building permit shall be limited to two(2) structures. (c) Mini-bike, motorcycle, dirt bike or similar two (2) or more wheel motor vehicle riding is allowed subject to the following limitations (1) No more than two (2) such vehicles shall be operating at the same time. (2) Operation is limited to a maximum of two (2)hours in a day (i) This limit applies even if only one (1) such vehicle is being operated. (3) Operation is limited to a maximum of eight(8) hours in a week. (i) This limit applies even if only one(1) such vehicle is operated. (ii) A week shall be measured from Monday through Sunday (4) Notwithstanding the above, no such use shall be allowed prior to noon on Sundays. 49 (5) Any violations to the above-mentioned limitations are subject to cost recovery for responses to disturbances, as listed in Section 9-14 14 (d) Exceptions to Accessory Structure Standards. (1) Detached accessory structures that edeeedfequifeffients deviate from requirements are subject to the approval of a minor conditional use permit. (2) Any detached accessory structure in excess of the two(2) structures permitted or when multiple exempt accessory structures(less than 120 Square feed are constructed on the premise that are no longer accessory uses to the primary unit as determined by the Community Development Director is subject to the approval of a minor conditional use permit. (Ord. 454 § 3 (part), 2004 Ord. 449 § 1, 2004, Ord. 412 § 3, 2003 Ord. 68 § 9-6 106, 1983) 9 Elimination of Interim Church Uses Previous City Attorneys have advised the department to eliminate interim uses as these uses typically establish a right to remain Interim uses are hard for staff to enforce, thus staff is recommending removal of "interim" church uses from the code Proposed Text Chancre: 9-6.121 Churches and related activities. Religious meeting facilities are subject to the following standards (a) Location. Church facilities shall be located on a collector or arterial. (b) Limitation on Use. When located in an RS, RSF or LSF Zone,related activities may be limited to a Sunday school,an accessory residence, and small meeting rooms Schools, gyms and facilities other than the sanctuary designed for large gatherings may be prohibited. (6) interim uses in the GS and GPK Zones.A ehufeh may be allowed as an interim use i GS or C=PK Zone, subjeet te the f ll . „g standar-Els-- (4) tard.,-El - (2) Days and hatir-s of operation shall be limited to Sundays and week nights aftef nefffial business hours; (3) The initial entitlement te operate shall be limited to a pefied fiet to exeeed thfee yeafs. Thefeafter,the Planning Commissien may gfapA a one (1) time extension not to exeeed-tw-A ('22) . , 1983) 50 10 Update of "recycling and scrap" uses and modification of additional sections for consistency With the proposed new definition, staff is proposing modification of the following sections for consistency purposes These special use requirements enable staff to better regulate these uses With the new definition and combining of uses, the need for AMC 9-6 183-Vehicle Storage would be obsolete, thus staff is recommending this section be eliminated Proposed Text Change: 9-6.131 Storage, Reeycling,and Dismantling of Vehicles and Materials. (a) Location.At least five hundred(500) feet from any school, church, hospital, public building, commercial, or residential zone (b) Minimum Site Area. One acre (c) Parking Requirement. Two (Z) spaces, plus one space for each five thousand (5,000) square feet of use area. (d) Site Design and Operation. All outdoor and indoor recycling Reey O facilities and wrecking yards. and impound lots are subject to all provisions of Section 9-6 140 (Ord. 68 § 9-6 131, 1983) Proposed Text Channe: 9-6.140 Storage yards. Outdoor storage yards,ineluding-exdudin( the storage of vehicles ins-than a day use parking lot or garage, are subject to the provisions of this section. The storage of vehicles in a public or commercial parking lot or garage is subject to Section 9-4 114, the storage of wrecked or abandoned vehicles, or vehicles being dismantled, is subject to Section 9-6 131, in addition to this section. Proposed Text Change: This section applies te eafnmeFeial par-king lots, gar-age and other-establishments engaged in the storage of vehicles for a fee of without fiee as a principal use,whether-owned and eperated publiely e pr-ivately. The sterage of vehiejes for-sale is subjeet to Seetion 9 6.139. The star-age E)f vehieles in Ffli'}lpa" .,1 and industrial zenes is ,l eet to SerA.. n 6.140. (a) Ltmita4ien an Use. Vehiele storage establishments in the eemmer-eial zenes afe to be e 51 11 Update of"Individual Mobilehomes" The individual mobile homes section was last updated in 1983 Since that time, the quality of design and durability of "mobilehomes" has increased The term "mobilehome" is no longer used "Manufactured home" is now commonly used to refer to this type of use These structures are available in variety of designs and sizes At the time of the adoption of the code, a "double-wide" (two 10-foot long modulars) were the only structures that could meet the required codes to be used as a residence Manufactures have developed smaller modules that have been approved for residential occupancy Staff is proposing an update to this code section to allow for smaller manufactured homes, substituting terminology, and streamlining architectural review of these structures Planning Commission recommended a change to this section The Commission recommended that an applicant have the ability to have a smaller modular home width than the revised 15 ft. This would only be granted if the Design Review Committee (DRC) approved such a design The second change is one that the Planning Commission recommended staff explore prior to the Council hearing Section 9-6 142 (8) deals with the City transferring title and licenses of manufactured homes, mobile homes etc The State Department of Housing and Community Development has taken over this function, thus the City no longer needs to perform this action Staff is recommending removal of this text language Proposed Text Change: 9-6.142 individual mobitehemesManufactured homes. When used for permanent residential occupancy, individual fnebilehemesmanufactured homes are subject to the standards of this section, in addition to Title 8 of this Code(the building and eeflStf let^^ efdinaneeBuilding) Manufactured homes Mebilehemes used as temporary offices or dwellings are subject to Section 9-6 172 et seq Manufactured home sales lots are subject to Section 9-6 139 (a) Location.An individual manufactured home m^'�„ ilehor-neis to be located as follows. (1) Within an approved mobilehome park or subdivision, (2) On any single-family residential parcel abject to the manufactured home fflobilehome standards specified in subsection (b)of this section. (b) Manufactured homes Mebileheme Standards. (1) if a manufactured home is considered a Pit-mobilehome,the structure shall be certified under the National Mobilehome Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (2) The manufactured home mobileheffie shall be placed on an approved permanent foundation system.An approved foundation system shall include any foundation system approved by the 52 State Department of Housing and Community Development or any foundation designed by an engineer or architect in compliance with applicable provisions of the Unife i3i-4dopted Building Code. (3) Roof aver-hangs, reefing matef:ial and exter-ior siding whieh shall extend to the ground shall be eampatiblewith other dwellinl9ts existing xA,ithin the sur+eundmg area. At the time of permit application,the Planning Director shall review the architectural features and treatment of the proposed manufactured home mobil epae—with similar features on existing dwelling within the area aad shall....,',o the mebilehome eempatThe decision of the Planning Director may be appealed to the Planning Commission and the decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council, as set forth in Section 9-1 111 (4) Manufactured homes Nelobilehomes shall have a minimum width of fifteen(2815) feet. Manufactured homes with widths less than fifteen (15) feet may be permitted with approval by the Desi ng_Review Committee. (5) Utility connections including water, sewer, gas and electric shall be made permanent in the same manner as conventional housing. Utility shutoff valves shall be accessible and shall not be located under the mebilehames or behind siding or skirting of a manufactured home. (6) No additions or other structural modifications shall be made to the manufactured home mobilehewithout prior approval from the State Department of Housing and C-mmnunity Develop nit and the 4ase.,,ere Planning Depai4 *the City (7) An application shall include all information necessary to comply with State of California regulations,as well as other permit information and fees established by the City for its processing of a ma"��lehomean application. , the owner-E)f the Faebileheme shall surrender-to the Qt�,the eeftifirsate of owner-ship, heense pla4es, or- deeals, and other-depaAment of motor-vehieles registration indioia. if any of these items a,-e not available_� the awneF shall submit to the City a"statement of faets" on the appropriate Depatiment ef N4eter-Vehic, for-pa indieating tha4 these items are missing or-lest. When the mebilehome is new and has never-been mabileheme dealer selling the mobilehome stating that the mebileheffle is fiew and has fiever-been registered: (c) Storage Unoccupied manufactured homes mobilehomes-that are not fixed to a foundation or a prepared permanent site are to be stored only in a ^w ;e sales lot, a storage yard, or in a mobilehome park. (Ord. 68 § 9-6 142, 1983) 12. Clarification of Non-Conforming Lots definition of uses With the tightening of mortgage lending practices, staff has received numerous calls in regards to uses on legal, non-conforming lots A legal, non-conforming lot is defined as a lot that has been created and recorded with the County that does not meet the City's minimum lot size for a particular zoning district. Typically lenders, as well as residents, are confused with whether existing structures may be "rebuilt" or additions may be permitted on legal, non-conforming lots Staff proposes the following text change to aid Ifto 53 lenders and homeowners with clarifying what type of structures are permitted on non- conforming lots The Planning Commission recommended modification to section 9-7113 (b) The Commission recommends that a certificate of compliance be "approved", prior to the City recognizing it is a legal lot rather than a lot being only "eligible" for a certificate of compliance Proposed Text Change: 9-7.113 Nonconforming lot defined. Any lot having an area less than the smallest minimum parcel size required by this title or other ordinances, is a legal nonconforming lot if- (a) £(a) The lot is shown on a duly approved and recorded subdivision or parcel map, or (b) The lot has, or-is eligible been issued a certificate of compliance or a conditional certificate of compliance (Ord. 68 §9-7 113, 1983)- 9-7 114 Use of nonconforming lots. A legal nonconforming lot may be useddeveloped for�u_ses identified as an allowable or conditional use by CItaptef-Tit_le 9� provided the minimum" urdevelo meat standards dents established for a particular use Q ° ' "„ ' ° s” =a= �are satisfied. This includes structures that are partially or completely destroyed that are conforming use sAW. 68 § o 7.114, 1983 13. Revision to Building Code for Fire Sprinkler Exceptions Staff is proposing a revision to chapter 3 of the Title 8-Building of the Atascadero Municipal Code This revision pertains to the fire sprinkler exceptions for additions to commercial buildings The existing exemption for additions is currently ten percent (10%) of the total floor area of the existing building This lower allowance is prohibitive to business owners whom wish to expand existing buildings rather than buying or leasing new buildings By modifying these standards to thresholds acceptable to the Fire Department, the City will continue to meet and achieve its economic development goals The Atascadero Fire Department requested a closer examination of the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval Working with Staff, the Fire Department has seen and approved the changes to the text language the Planning Commission recommended 54 Proposed Text Change: 8-3.101 Modifications of the California Building Code. 903.2 Where required. An approved automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed. 1 Throughout all new buildings Exceptions 1 Buildings containing Groups B and M occupancies where floor area is not more than 500 square feet(46 45 m2)and located not less than 10 feet from adjacent buildings on the same property and not less than 5 feet from adjacent property lines. 2. Buildings containing Group U occupancies where floor area is less than 1000 square feet (92 9 m2)and located not less than 10 feet from adjacent buildings on the same property and not less than 5 feet from adjacent property lines, unless part of a mixed-occupancy building containing a Group R, Division 3 occupancy 23 Throughout an existing building whenever additions exceed ten (10) percent of the total floor area of the existing building and the total combined floor area will exceed 2,000 square feet(185 8 m2), or a second story or greater is added, or the occupancy is changed to a more hazardous use Exception 3. Group R, Division 3 occupancies where the total combined floor area will not exceed 3,000 square feet(278.7 m2) 4. Group B and M occupancies whenever single or multiple additions will not exceed 1,000 square feet 92.9 n12)beyond the size of the structure on the effective date of this regulation or the total combined floor area will not exceed 5,000 square feet(464.5 m2). and a second story or -reater is not added,and the Occupancy is not changed to a more hazardous use. 14 Revision to Downtown Office (DO) Permitted Uses Staff is proposing consistency with the Downtown Commercial (DC) by making "libraries, museums, and galleries" an allowed use within this zoning district. These uses are not in conflict with existing uses as well as the Downtown Revitalization Plan 55 Proposed Text Change: 9-3.262 Downtown district allowable land uses and permit requirements. Allowed Uses and Permit Requirements P Permitted Use for Downtown Zoning Districts CUP Conditional Use Permit required — Use not allowed PERMIT REQUIRED Specific Use LAND USE (1) DC DO Regulations RECREATION, EDUCATION & ASSEMBLY USES Libraries, museums galleries P —P Proposed Environmental Determination The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Section 15061 (3) Review for Exemption) exempts activities which are covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. The proposed Text Amendment will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts associated with this project application Conclusion. The Text Amendments discussed in the staff report are consistent with General Plan and create consistency and clarification and allow for clear interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance, the primary implementation tool of the General Plan The creation of the Design Review Committee meets the Goals and Policies associated with enhancing the appearance and rural character of the City The CUP amendment is consistent with the City's General Plan to retain and expand existing businesses and attract new businesses to improve the availability of goods and services Land use descriptions are proposed to be updated for logical interpretation and ensuring that development is compatible with existing and surrounding neighborhoods, consistent with the General Plan Multi-family residential setbacks are proposed to be modified consistent with Planned Developments (PD) that have been approved with similar setbacks and encourages infill development in the urban core Amendments proposed to the interior setbacks and open areas are provided for clarification purposes for staff and residents, as well as consistency with the 2007 California Building Code (CBC) Update of the Second Residential Unit Chapter brings consistency with adopted Community Development Department policies with the zoning text as well as consistency with State Housing Policies and the 2007 CBC *wr 56 The proposed amendment to the residential accessory structures defines exempt structures for clarity and consistency with the California Building Code Updates of "mobilehomes" recycling and scrap and "interim church uses" are updates for consistency with new definitions and State guidelines and interpretations Amendment to the non-conforming lot definitions is for clarity purposes to define what is a legal lot, as well as permitted and conditionally permitted uses, consistent with the zoning code The fire sprinkler exception from the CBC amendments is consistent with the General Plan's goals and policies in regards to retaining and expanding existing businesses. The proposed amendment to the Downtown Office (DO) permitted uses allows for libraries, museums, and galleries in this zone which is consistent with the intent of this zone FISCAL IMPACT There are no fiscal impacts associated with the proposed code text updates ALTERNATIVES 1 The City Council may make modifications to the proposed text amendments 2 The City Council may determine that more information is needed on some aspect of the proposed text amendments and may refer the item back to staff to develop the additional information The Council should clearly state the type of information that is required and move to continue the item to a future date 3 The City Council may deny the proposed text amendments The Council should specify the reasons for denial of the amendments and recommend an associated finding with such action ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 Notice of Exemption Attachment 2 Proposed Zoning Matrix Modification Attachment 3 Draft Ordinance A -ri' 57 ATTACHMENT 1 Notice of Exemption tiw CITY OF ATASCADERO NOTICE OF EXEMPTION 6907 El Camino Real Atascadero,CA 93422 805 461.5000 TO- File FROM: City of Atascadero Community Development Department 6907 El Camino Real Atascadero,CA 93422 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in Compliance with CEQA Sections 15061and 15062 Project Title ZONING ORDINANCE.CODE TEXT AMENDMENT Project Location(Include County) Citywide,Atascadero,CA 93422(San Luis Obispo County) Project Description Proposed Building Code and Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments to portions of Title 8 Building Code and Title 9 Planning and"Zoning.Proposed text amendments consist of revisions for clarification purposes with existing department policies and introduction of language that is consistent with the Goals and Policies of the City's General Plan.Text amendments including the following: • Establishment of a Design Review Committee(proposed AMC 9-2.107) • Amend Conditional Use Permit process(AMC 9-2.109),amend land use description for personal .services" • Codify new land use description for personal services-restricted" • Amend land use description for sexually oriented business"(AMC 9-3.701) • Amend land use description of`recycling and scrap (AMC 9-3.701) • Modify front setbacks in the RMF zoning district(AMC 9-4.106) • Amend Interior setbacks and open areas(AMC 9-4.109) • Amend Chapter 5-Second Residential Units • Amend residential accessory structures(AMC 9-6106) • Elimination of interim church uses in the CS and CPK zones(AMC 9-6.121) • Amend of`recycling and scrap uses and amend additional sections for consistency(AMC 9-6.131, AMC 9-6.140,and AMC 9-6.183) • Amend Individual Mobile homes"(AMC 9-6.142) • Update non conforming lot definitions(AMC 9-7113 and 9-7114) • Revision of the Building Code exemptions to fire sprinklers(AMC 8-3.101) • Amendment uses in the Downtown Office zoning district(AMC 9-3262). Name of Public Agency Approving Project City of Atascadero Name of Person or Agency C=3ing Out Project Community Development Department,City of Atascadero 58 ATTACHMENT 1 Notice of Exemption CITY OF 41ASCADERO NOTICE OF EXE)WITION Page 2 of 2 E>xentpt Status. Reasons whY preyed i.s'e,%ernpt: 'Cllr California environmental Quality Act(('I;QA)(Section 15061.0)Review far C:xenrptianf exempts activities which are covered by the p eneral rule that(TI'QA applies only to prujccts,which terve the lx.Nemiat for causing,a significant effect on the envimimrent. Date: July 2i1,2010 wa��— 0, f Alfredo R.Castillo.A101 Assistant Planner Page 2 of 2 59 ATTACHMENT 2: Proposed Zoning Matrix Modifications City of Atascadoro Zoning M4Catri Special Land Line Use £See Use Dallnitioti A RS RSF LSF RMF CN CP CR C8 CT CP1C W, DO IF, I L LS P Hegularivn 7saista d lebttc ' 77 Amusement Services CUP CLIP CUP y A A CLIP Churches&Related CUP* -,JP" DIP, CUP' CLIP' CUP" � Cu-* 9-&121 4cUvities indoor fiecrealion ;IP CLIP A(6; "L;P A C'.€P A .Up A Services Ubrades,Museums CUP CUP cur CUP A A A A A A A A A r 4' Ia Membership A A UP CUP A CSP Organizations Outdoor Recreation CUP' CUP` A' A 1P` A' 94123 Services Public Assembly& CLIP CUP A "'UP CUP CIDP A Entertainment Public Parks& A A Playgrounds Rural Sports&Group P' CUP" A Cup- 9-6.124 Facilities Social&Service A A A CUP organizations 1111101 Sports Assembly ;up CUP A t;uP Temporary Events A A' A' A' A" A' A' A A' A' A" A A` A 9-6.177 777 L�IIJij. 7 77777T Bed and Breakfast .. CUP CL+P CUP CUP n.. A A A(8', CUP A ,A Hotels,Motels A A A Cup Cup Recreational Vehicle A '-LIP* CUP' Ci-' 9-6.180 Parks 17) Barjavern CIDP CUP ..UP A Eating&Drinking Places A A A A A A A .JP CUR ,jr .:UP {14' 10)' .._...._......._._--......_..----.__.._.___...__ .___..[___........._.--.--.._............. ____.......... .._._. _ __ _--.._ ...... _ ........_— ............. r._.___ Eating&Drinking Pres CUP CUP u'uP CLIP -.'P with DrWo—Through Facilities Accessory Storage .,. A A' A A" 1 A A A' A A' A" A• A A•. 9-8.103 Parking Lots L ICUP A Allowed Use ++ Usted in Downtown Only;does not Apply to other zones Special Use Regulation Last Updated SAW CUP Conditional Use Permit Requlfed Blank Not Permitted Use (3) See Special Use Key on Last Page Page 2 of f 1114w" 60 ATTACHMENT 2: Proposed Zoning Matrix Modifications City of Atascadero Zoning Matrix Land Use Special A RS RSF LSF RMF CN CP CR CS CT CPK DC DO iP I L LS P R use{see Use t7efinitian} egulanan General Sertrlaas ,: Continued Broadcasting Studios CSP CSP CSP CSP A A A A CUP A A A A Business Support ..CUP CUP CUP CUP A" A' A' A A A A A CUP Services ;51 (5S S} tTa1 18) (19) 1181 Cerneteries I I CUP CUP CUP Contract Construction A A A A Services Funeral Services A A CUP Kennels A. CUP' CUP' CUP, A` 9.9.111 Laundries&Dry Cleaning A A A A Plants Light Repair Services A A A A A A A A Medical Marijuana CUP` 6-13.101 Dispensary 124 Mini-Storage cup CUP Personal Services CUP CUP CUP CUP A A A A A(6) A (51 (5) i5) (5l) CUP CUP {101 Personal Services CUP A CUP CUP Restricted Printing&Publishing A A Service Stations CUP' CUP' CUP' A' 9.9.194 Studios—Art,Dance, ++ a +« :+ + +, ++ »a +« A CUP w «, Martial Arts,Mkisic...++ AgNCttturs/tlatga, n F< Agricultural Accessory A' A A' A' 9.9.109 Uses Ag Processing A CUP CUP A Crop Production& A' CUP" A" 9.9.113 Grazing Farm ArA nal Raising A" A A' CUP" A' 9.6,112 Farm Equipment& A A A A A Supplies Farm Labor Quarters A' Horticultural Specialties A' A A' A' A A' CUP" 9-6118 (19) {16i CUP, (20} A Allowed Use *+ Listed in Downtown Only,does not apply to other zones Special Use Regulation Last Updated 9115109 CUP Conditional Use Permit Required Slank Not Permitted Use (3) See Special Use Key on Last Page Page 4 of a 61 ATTACHMENT 3: Draft Ordinance A DRAFT ORDINANCE A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE TEXT CHANGE 2009-0155 AMENDING TITLE 8 AND TITLE 9 OF THE ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE PLN 2010-1364/ZCH 2010-0159 (Citywide/City of Atascadero) The City Council hereby finds and declares as follows WHEREAS, an application has been received from the City of Atascadero (6907 El Camino Real, Atascadero CA 93422), to consider Zone Change Text Amendments regarding the creation of a Design Review Committee, Conditional Use Permit size limitation revisions, land use descriptions for personal services, personal services-restricted and storage, recycling and dismantling of vehicles and material, modification of front setbacks in the RMF zoning district; modification of interior setbacks and open areas, amendments to Chapter 5-Second Residential Units, amendments to residential accessory uses, elimination of interim church uses in the CS and CPK zoning districts, revisions to the recycling and scrap uses, elimination of vehicle storage use requirements for consistency purposes, amendments to the mobilehomes use section, amendments to the non-conforming lots section, revisions to the Chapter 3 exceptions for fire sprinklers in Title 8 of the Building Code and revision to permitted uses in the Downtown Office Zoning District and, WHEREAS, a Notice of Exemption was prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enact this amendment to Title 8 Building Code and Title 9 Planning and Zoning of the Municipal Code, and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) have been adhered to, and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Planning and Zoning Text Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Planning and fir+ Zoning Text Amendments, and, 62 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a Public Hearing held on July 20, 2010, studied and recommended PLN 2010-1364/ZCH 2010-0159 for approval, and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on August 10, 2010 studied and considered Zone Change 2010-0159; and, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1 Title 8 of the Atascadero Municipal Code is amended to read as follows 903.2 Where required An approved automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed 1 Throughout all new buildings Exceptions 1 Buildings containing Groups B and M occupancies where floor area is not more than 500 square feet (46 45 m2) and located not less than 10 feet from adjacent buildings on the same property and not less than 5 feet from adjacent property lines 2. Buildings containing Group U occupancies where floor area is less than 2000 square feet (92 9 m2) and located not less than 10 feet from adjacent buildings on the same property and not less than 5 feet from adjacent property lines, unless part of a mixed-occupancy building containing a Group R, Division 3 occupancy 2 Throughout an existing building whenever additions exceed ten (10) percent of the total floor area of the existing building and the total combined floor area will exceed 2,000 square feet (185 8 m2), or a second story or greater is added, or the occupancy is changed to a more hazardous use Exceptions 1. Group R, Division 3 occupancies where the total combined floor area will not exceed 3,000 square feet (278 7 m2) 2 Group B and M occupancies whenever single or multiple additions will not exceed 1,000 square feet (92.9 m2) beyond the size of the structure on the effective date of this regulation or the total * 63 combined floor area will not exceed 5,000 square feet (464.5 m2), and a second story or greater is not added, and the occupancy is not changed to a more hazardous use. 3 In additions to existing buildings equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system For the purpose of requiring the automatic fire sprinkler systems specified in this chapter, the floor area within the surrounding exterior walls shall be considered as one building An automatic fire sprinkler system need not be installed in spaces or areas in telecommunications buildings used exclusively for telecommunications equipment, associated electrical power distribution equipment, batteries and standby engines, provided those spaces or areas are equipped throughout with an automatic fire alarm system and are separated from the remainder of the building by fire barriers consisting of not less than 1-hour fire-resistance-rated walls and 2-hour fir-resistance-rated floor/ceiling assemblies SECTION 2 Title 9 of the Atascadero Municipal Code is amended to read as follows Chapter 2 Applications, Content, Processing, and Time Limits 9-2.107 Design Review Committee. (a) Purpose. The Design Review Committee is established to implement the goals and policies of the General Plan. The intent is to ensure that the physical design of new development meets the following obiectives. (1) Maintaining the rural character and identity of Atascadero, (2) Enhancing the appearance and character of the City, by reviewing the architecture and site plans for-commercial office, industrial, single family residential subiect to CEQA and multi-family residential proiects, (3) Ensuring that development is compatible with, surrounding uses and improvements by requiring building designs that provide appropriate visual appearance and site plans to mitigate neighborhood impacts. (b) Design Review Committee—Composition. The City Council shall appoint the Design Review Committee. The Development Review Committee shall consist of the following. (1) Two (2) members of the City Council, 64 (2) Two (2) members of the Planning Commission, (3) One (1) at large member resident of the City. This at large member shall be a resident of the City. The Council shall choose an at large member that best fits the intent of the Design Review Committee. (c) Terms of Service. The Design Review Committee members from the City Council and Planninq Commission shall serve a two (2) year term. This service term shall commence at the date of appointment. The at larqe member resident shall have a service term of two (2) years This term shall begin at the date of appointment by the City Council. (d) Authority. The Design Review Committee has the authority to approve and make recommendation in regards to the architectural appearance, signage, site plan and landscape plan of the following projects. (1) All Multi-family Residential proiects. (2) All non-residential projects including. commercial, office, mixed-use and industrial developments). (3) All Public Facility proiects and buildings (4) Development in an open space zoning district. (s) Any residential single family residential development requesting a planned development permit. (6) Development projects requiring a precise plan, conditional use permit zone change or general plan amendment. (e) Meeting. The Design Review Committee shall convene once a week as needed. This meeting shall consist of the Committee the Community Development Director, pertinent city staff members and the applicant. -(f) Appearance Review Approval The Desiqn Review Committee shall take into consideration the following criteria in either approving the design of a project or making recommendations for projects that require Planning Commission approval The Design Review Committee may require or recommend additional conditions of approval The following is a list of criteria that the Design Review Committee shall take into consideration. (1) The goals and policies established by the General Plan (2) Guidelines and standards for development set forth by the Appearance Review Manual, 65 (3) The proposed development plan is compatible with, and is not detrimental to surrounding land uses and improvements provide appropriate visual appearance, (q) Determination. (1) The Community Development Director shall provide the applicant with correspondence regarding the outcome of the meeting, including any additional conditions of approvals that is required or recommended by the Committee. (h) Compliance. All requirements imposed by Design Review Committee shall be incorporated into a building permit and completed prior to permit final. Failure to comply with the requirements of Development Review Committee constitutes a violation of this code. (i) Appeals. Appeals of decisions from the Design Review Committee shall be made to the Planning Commission and filed within 15 days of the Design Review Committee's decision. Any additional appeals shall be consistent with section 9-1.111 of this chapter. If the Design Review Committee cannot reach a decision on a design review issue the Committee may refer this issue to the Planning Commission. 9-2.4407-108 Plot plan 9-2.408-109 Precise plan 9-2.409-110 Conditional use permit. The conditional use permit is the process used to review land use proposals of a nature or magnitude which could significantly affect their surroundings Such land use proposals include (i) Uses that are shown as conditional uses in a particular zoning district; or (ii) Multiple-family residential developments consisting of twelve (12) or more units, even if such a development is listed as an allowed use in a particular zoning district, or MGFe of building or eutdeeF storage aFea, even of GUGh a develeprnent is listed as aR r ll.,w.,hlc Use in ,-aFtiG !aF ZGR ng dicarStFmGt (iii) Nonresidential development containing fifty-thousand (50,000) square feet or more of building footprint area even if such a development is listed as an allowable use in a particular zoning district; or I%W 66 (iv) Outdoor commercial and industrial sales and storage developments as defined by 9-9.102 of ten-thousand (10,000) square feet or more, even if such a development is listed as an allowable use in a particular zoning district. 9-2.44-2-111 Approved plans 9-2.444-112 Permit time limits 9-2.444-113 Substantial site work defined 9-2.446-114 Project completion 9-2.446-115 Occupancy or use of partially completed projects. 9-2.447-116 Occupancy with incomplete site improvements 9-2.44 -117 Extension of entitlement. 9-2 449-118 Lapse of entitlement. 9-2 42119 Applications deemed approved 9-2.424-120 Applications deemed withdrawn 9-2.4121 Guarantees of performance Chapter 3 Zoning Districts Article 29 Land Use Descriptions Storage, Recycling and Dismantling of Vehicles and Material -Establishments primarily engaged in the storage, assembling, breaking tpdismantling, sorting, temporary steFage and distribution of materials, equipment and vehicles. This use maybe located either outdoors or indoors. lncludesFeGyGlable and/OF reg sable .SGFap and waste Fnate4a4- but is not limited to, -auto wrecking yards vehicle storage areas,and vehicle impounds lots recyclable / waste material storage and transfer facilities. This doesDaes not include waste disposal sites, which are separately defined Does net ORG6de,_or temporary storage of toxic or radioactive waste materials Personal Services Service establishments primarily engaged in providing non- medical services geneFally involving the Gare of the person whiGh are net R;ediGally related, i^^'„. ,.as a primary use and may include accessory retail sales of products related to the services provided. These uses include the following beauty shops (includes permanent makeup when less than 10% of overall sales),and barber shops,; day spas and massage therapy where each massage therapist is license by the State shoe repair shops, saunas and hot tubs, .pry cleaning pickup stores and small 6Gale dry clothing rental, tailors, tanning salons, and aatiR9 and esseFt seR�iees, aGtiVitle& pet grooming services, and other similar uses. Personal Services-Restricted. Service establishments that may have a blighting and/or deteriorating effect upon the surrounding area which may need to be dispersed in order to minimize their adverse impact. Examples of these uses include but not limited to the following. check cashing and/or pay day/same day loans fortune tellers Psychics, palm, tarot and card readers tattoo and body piercing services pawn shops 1440 67 to which the business of pawn brokering, or the business of lending money upon *""'' personal property, pawns or pledges is done, and hot tubs and saunas that are not an accessory to a permitted use. Sexually Oriented Business. Any business defined by the Atascadero Sexually Oriented Business Ordinance (see Chapter 5-10 of this Code) as an adult arcade, adult bookstore, adult novelty store, adult video store, adult cabaret, adult motel, adult motion picture theater, adult theater, massage parlor (excluding day spa as- defoRed b sepAca6 State licensed massage therapy), sexual encounter establishment, or nude model studio is a sexually oriented business. 9-3 223 Conditional uses The following uses may be allowed in the Commercial Retail Zone The establishment of conditional uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2 109 (Conditional use permits) (a) Amusement services, (b) Bar/tavern, (c) Caretaker residence (see Section 9-6 104), (d) Eating and drinking places with drive-through facilities, 1%W (e) Service station (see Section 9-6 164), (f) Public assembly and entertainment; (g) Indoor recreation services, (h) Animal hospitals (see Section 9-6 110), (i) Auto repair and services (see Section 9-6 168), 0) Churches and related activities (see Section 9-6 121), (k) Food and kindred products (see Section 9-6 128), (1) Pipelines, (m) Outdoor recreation services (see Section 9-6 123), (n) Sports assembly; (o) Transit stations and terminals, Nwor 68 (p) Kennels (see Section 9-6 111), (q) Vehicle and equipment storage (see Section 9-6 183), (r) Auto dealers (new and used) and supplies (see Section 9-6 163) (Ord 473 § 2 (part), 2005 Ord 364 § 2 (part), Exh B (part), 1999 Ord 310 § 3, Exh B (part), 1996 Ord 68 § 9-3 223, 1983) (s) Personal Services-Restricted 9-3.232 Allowable uses The following uses are allowed in the Commercial Service Zone The establishment of allowable uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2 107 (Plot plans) and Section 9-2 108 (Precise plans) (a) All uses listed as allowable uses in the CR (Commercial Retail) Zone, (b) Wholesaling and distribution, (c) Light repair services, (d) Apparel and finish products, where areas of use are less than five thousand (5,000) square feet; (e) Electronic and scientific instruments, where areas of use are less than five thousand (5,000) square feet; (f) Furniture and fixtures, where areas of use are less than five thousand (5,000) square feet; (g) Animal hospitals (see Section 9-6 110), (h) Auto repair and services (see Section 9-6 168), (i) Laundries and dry cleaning plants, Q) Stone and cut stone products, where all areas of use are less than five thousand (5,000) square feet; (k) Contract construction services, (1) Food and kindred products (see Section 9-6 128), (m) Kennels (see Section 9-6 111), (n) Personal Services-Restricted, 69 (2+i) Sexually oriented businesses (see Chapter 5-10) (Ord 473 § 2 (part), 2005 Ord 364 § 2 (part), Exh B (part), 1999 Ord 300 § 2 (3), 1996, Ord 169 § 2 (part), Exh A (part), 1988 Ord 68 § 9-3 232, 1983) 9-3 243 Conditional uses. The following uses may be allowed in the Commercial Tourist Zone The establishment of conditional uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2 109 (a) Amusement services, (b) Auto, mobilehome and vehicle dealers and supplies (see Section 9-6 163), (c) Bar/tavern, (d) Eating and drinking places with drive-through facilities, (e) Health care services, (f) Sales lots (see Section 9-6 139), (g) Caretaker's residence (see Section 9-6 104), (h) Pipelines,:- 0) ipelines0) Personal Services-Restricted. (Ord 509 § 2, 2007 Ord 473 § 2 (part), 2005 Ord 68 § 9-3.243, 1983) 9-3 253 Conditional uses The following uses may be established in the Commercial Park Zone with Planning Commission approval The establishment of conditional uses shall be as provided by Chapter 9-2 of this title (a) Animal hospitals, (b) Auto repair and services (see Section 9-6 168 of this title), (c) Bar/tavern, (d) Chemical products, (e) Concrete, gypsum and plaster products, 70 (f) Eating and drinking places where areas of use are greater than two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet per store, (g) Eating and drinking places with drive-through facilities, (h) Glass products, (i) Indoor recreational uses, 0) Lumber and wood products, (k) Machinery manufacturing, (1) Membership organizations, (m) Mini-storage, (n) Paper products, (o) Paving materials, (p) Pipelines, (q) Plastics and rubber products, (r) Public assembly and entertainment; (s) Sales lots (see Section 9-6 139 of this title), (t) Structural clay pottery products, (u) Textile mills, (v) Transit stations and terminals, (w) Vehicle and equipment storage (see Section 9-6 183 of this title), (x) Warehousing, (y) Auto dealers (new and used) and supplies (see Section 9-6 163 of this title)1- (Ord 489 § 2 (part), 2006 Ord 473 § 2 (part), 2005 Ord 364 § 2 (part), Exh B (part), 1999 Ord 349 § 3, 1998, Ord 311 § 3, Exh B (part), 1996 Ord 169 § 2 (part), Exh B (part), 1988 Ord 75 § 2 (3), 1984, Ord 68 § 9-3 253, 1983) (z) Personal Services-Restricted. 71 9-3 262 Downtown district allowable land uses and permit requirements. Allowed Uses and Permit P Permitted Use Requirements for Downtown Zoning CUP Conditional Use Permit required Districts — Use not allowed PERMIT REQUIRED Specific Use LAND USE (1) DC DO Regulations RECREATION, EDUCATION & ASSEMBLY USES Libraries, museums, galleries I P P Chapter 4 General Site and Development Standards 9-4 106 Front setbacks. The front setback is measured at right angles from the nearest point on the front property line to the building line All structures are to be set back a minimum of twenty- five (25) feet from the nearest point on the front property line, except where this section establishes other requirements. Front setback landscaping and fencing standards are in Sections 9-4 125(a) and 9-4 128 of this chapter, respectively (a) A, RS, RSF, and -LSF and RMF Zones and R sidential Uses+'R GGmmeFGial and InidustFial Zr.R All residential uses �. u �v vvuser, shall have a minimum front setback of twenty-five (25) feet, except as follows (1) Shallow Lots The front setback shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet for any lot less than ninety (90) feet deep (2) Flag Lots Determination of that portion of the site to constitute the required front yard shall be at the discretion of the applicant. (3) Sloping Lot Adjustment. In any case where the elevation of the natural grade on a lot at a point fifty (50) feet from the centerline of the adjacent street right-of- way is seven (7) feet above or below the elevation of the centerline, a private garage may be located, at the discretion of the applicant, as close as five (5) feet to the street property line, pursuant to Section 9-1 112 of this title, provided that portions of the dwelling other than the garage shall be established at the setback otherwise required (4) Variable Setback Block. Where a residential block is partially developed with single family dwellings having less than the required front setbacks and no uniform front setback is established, the front setback may be adjusted (Section 9-1 112 of this 1%MW title) at the option of the applicant, as follows 72 (i) Prerequisites for Adjustment. Adjustment may be granted only when twenty-five percent (25%) of the lots on the block with the same frontage are developed and the entire block is within a single zone (ii) Allowed Adjustment. The normally required minimum front setback is to be reduced to the average of the front setbacks of the existing dwellings, which include attached garages but not detached garages, to a minimum of ten (10) feet. (b) RMF Zone and residential uses in commercial and industrial zones. All residential units shall have a minimum setback of fifteen (15) feet. All garages shall have a minimum front setback of twenty (20) feet. (bc) CN, CP, CR, CS, CT, CPK, IP and I Zones. No front setbacks are required Ground floor residential uses are subject to the setback requirements of subsection (a) of this section (1) Adjacent to Residential Zone Where a commercial or industrial zone has a front setback, including a double frontage setback, on a street where more than fifty percent (50%) of the lots in the same block are zoned for residential use, the front setback shall be twenty-five (25) feet, except that a one story building or parking may encroach into one-half (1/2) the required front setback depth (ds) L, LS and P Zone A minimum ten- (10) foot front setback is required, provided that residential uses are subject to the setback requirements of subsection (a) of this section (ed) Double Frontage Lots (1) Selecting the Setback Location Where double frontage setback locations are not specified by subdivision requirements or other applicable regulations, the applicant may select the front setback street unless fifty percent (50%) of the lots on a double frontage block are developed with the same front yard orientation In that case, all remaining lots are to orient their front setbacks with the majority (2) Double Frontage Setback Requirements A full front setback is to be provided adjacent to one frontage, and a setback of one-half (1/2) the required front setback depth adjacent to the other frontage (fe) Establishment of Front Setback on Zoning Map The Planning Commission may establish greater front setbacks than those required in this section by delineating the setback on the zoning map Procedures specified by Section 9-1 115 of this title shall be followed in establishing such setbacks (Ord 68 § 9-4 106, 1983 Ord 82 § 9-4 106, 1984) 73 9-4.109 Interior setbacks and open areas Detached buildings located on the same site are to be separated as follows (a) Accessory Buildings An accessory building is to be located no closer than six (6) feet from any principal building or as required by the building code (b) Residential Buildings A prinGipal-residential building (including a multifamily dwelling) is not to be located closer than ten (10) feet to another pr+nsipal building (residential or non-residential) fhbein .(!0) feet, OF ^^e half the height E)T� taller of the tw e b uildings WhinheveF is greater (c) Exemptions. The following accessory structures are exempt from the provisions outlined in this section. (1) Decks (2) Patio covers and landscape structures (3) Structures under 120 square feet when exempt from a building permit based on adopted building code and consistent with the standards set forth in 9- 6.106(b)(3) ,%W (4) Similar accessory structures as determined by the Community Development Director. (ed) Nonresidential Buildings Set by the Wnifefm-Building Code (Ord 68 § 9- 4109, 1983) - 4109, 1983) Chapter 5 Residential Second Units 9-5.020 Definitions. As used in this chapter- (a) Primary Unit. A primary unit is a single-family dwelling unit on a single- family residential zoned legal lot of record All other uses and structures on said lot shall be accessory to the primary unit. (b) Second Unit. Second residential units are defined as residential occupancy constructions (R) with a kitchen and full bathroom that is accessory to the primary unit and intended for permanent occupancy by a second household `ftw 74 (c) Guesthouse Guesthouses are defined as residential occupancy construction (R) with a full bathroom, no kitchen or cooking facilities regardless of number or configuration of rooms and are the same as second units for the purposes of defining use and calculating fees (d) Granny Unit. Granny units are defined as residential occupancy construction (R) with a kitchen and a full bathroom and are the same as second units for the purposes of defining use and calculating fees (e) Detached Accessory Structure A detached accessory structure is a structure located on a residential lot occupied by a primary unit, exclusive of second units (f) Office/Art Studios Studios are defined as any type of residential occupancy construction (R) with no kitchens, no overnight stays, cooking facilities and/or no bathing facilities (one (1) water closet is permitted) Studios shall be limited to four hundred fifty (450) square feet. Studios greater than four hundred fifty (450) square feet shall be considered second units Deed restrictions shall be required for any proposed studio with a water closet limiting the use of the studio (g) Workshops and Garages Workshops and garages are defined as utility occupancy constructions (U) with no kitchens, no cooking facilities and/or no residential occupancy requirements (i e Title 24) A utility bathroom with shower or any other plumbing may be installed with a deed restriction that limits the buildings use to nonresidential purposes State approved wood burning appliances are permissible Attached structures may be permitted consistent with 9-5 060 and 9-6.106. (h) Residential Additions Residential additions (additions) are defined as an increase of habitable floor area to a primary residential unit. Additions shall have a continuous, logical internal connection without deer-,of conditioned space that provides for access to all portions of the primary unit and addition Doors may not be used to create two separate living spaces. The addition shall not have a secondary kitchen., however a wet bar is permissible as defined by 9-5.020.0). Additions must have a minimum 10-foot of shared common wall A breezeway or similar roof connection of unenclosed or unconditioned space regardless of length, shall not be considered to be a residential addition.-. (i) Recreational Vehicle Recreational vehicles are defined as any vehicle, coach, camper, travel trailer, boat, or similar movable residential facility that does not have a permanent foundation Recreational vehicles are not permitted to be used as any type of second unit or residential accessory use (Ord 454 § 3 (part), 2004) (i) Wet Bar. A wet bar is defined as a small counter equipped with a sink for running water consistent with the following -440 75 (1) A wet bar does not include a stove, built in microwave, dishwasher, or garbage disposal (2) A gas line shall not be installed in proximity to a wet bar. (3) A wet bar sink shall have a single trap drain size limited to 1 '/2-inches maximum. (4) A wet bar shall include a counter with a maximum eight foot (8') length and not to exceed 24 square feet of total counter space. (k) Any deviations from the above standards may be approved by the Planning Commission through the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. (1) A wet bar does not include a stove, built in microwave, dishwasher, or garbage disposal. (2)A gas line shall not be installed in proximity to a wet bar. (3)A wet bar sink shall have a single trap drain size limited to 1 '/2-inches maximum. (4)A wet bar shall include a counter with a maximum eight foot (8') length and not to exceed 24 square feet of total counter space. (k) Any deviations from the above standards may be approved by the Planning Commission through the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. 9-5.040 Permit required. (a) Permit Required A building permit application shall be required for the construction or conversion of any second unit. (Ord 454 § 3 (part), 2004) 9-5.060 Development standards. Second units shall be subject to all development standards of the RS, RSF-Z, LSF-Z, RSF-Y, LSF-Y, RSF-X, or LSF-X zoning districts and/or planned development overlay districts in which the property is located, except as modified in this section (a) Floor Area. The total floor area of a second unit shall not exceed ekJ4# hURdFed (800) squape feet on !Gtl-; Wath -;; met area of 0.5 aGFe6 GF T-hp-- h9t;;' fing area of a seGond „n,+ shall not eXGee J one thousand-two hundred (a;0001 ,200) square feet on hie, with a net area gFeater than 0 5 aures All development on a lot, including second units, must conform to the development standards of the underlying zoning 76 district, including, but not limited to, setbacks, building separations, maximum lot NINO coverage, grading limitations, and native tree preservation (b) Height. Second units shall conform to the height limits of the underlying zoning district. (c) Setbacks A second unit shall maintain the setbacks required in the underlying zoning district for a primary dwelling Detached second units shall not be considered as detached accessory buildings for the purpose of determining setbacks (d) Building Separations A minimum separation of ten (10) feet shall be maintained between the primary dwelling and a detached second unit. (e) Off-street Parking Off-street parking for the second unit shall be provided as follows and in addition to any required parking for the primary unit. (1) , shall be provided for eaGh 6eGend UR*t with twe (2) oF mere ,One (1) covered parking spot for the first bedroom. An additional uncovered or covered parking spot is required for any additional bedrooms. (2) The off-street parking spaces for second units must be on a paved surface, measure ten (10) feet in width if covered, nine (9) feet in width if uncovered, and twenty (20) feet in depth, tandem spaces may be approved for second units, (3) Parking spaces for second units may not occupy driveways and back-up areas that serve garages for the primary dwelling, nor may they occupy circular drives or hammerhead turnarounds that serve the primary unit (which are intended to provide means by which vehicles can enter a street head-first), (4) Parking spaces for second units may occupy areas for required rear and interior side yards, (5) Primary dwellings with three (3) car garages may allow one (1) bay and the driveway space in front of the bay to be used for a second unit off-street parking, (6) If the lot takes access from a collector or arterial street, as designated in the circulation element of the general plan, parking for second units shall be designed so that vehicles exit forward into the street. (fl Unconditioned Spaces. Structures such as _garages and—workshops attached to second units shall be accessory to the second residential unit and shall be limited to an additional 500 square feet. Anv additional unconditioned space in excess of 500 square feet, or any garage area not provided with direct interior access to the second unit, shall no longer be considered accessory to the second residential unit 77 (gf) The total maximum amount of paving for parking for both the primary and second unit in a front setback is fifty percent (50%) of the front yard setback area (hg) Architectural Design The design of the second unit shall be compatible with the design and scale of the primary dwelling (using substantially the same landscaping, color, materials and design on the exterior) (ih) Private Open Space Requirement. A second unit shall have a minimum private open space area of two hundred fifty (250) square feet. This required open space shall not be located within a required front yard setback. No portion of an open space area shall have a dimension of less than ten (10) feet in width @) Attached Second Units If the second unit is attached to the primary dwelling, each shall be served by separate outside entrances The interior wall(s) of an attached unit which separate it from the main unit shall be fire-rated according to the most recent Uniform Building Code (Ord 454 § 3 (part), 2004) Chapter 6 Special Uses 9-6 106 Residential accessory uses The standards of this section apply to the specific types of residential accessory structures listed Agricultural accessory structures for the keeping of animals are subject to Section 9-6 112 (a) Swimming Pools Swimming pools, including hot tubs, spas, and related equipment, may be located within any required side or rear setback, provided that they are no closer than eighteen (18) inches to a property line (additional setbacks maybe required by UBG he adopted building code), and provided that they are fenced as required by Section 9-6 128 (b) Detached Accessory Structures Any detached accessory structure intended for residential accessory uses and accessory storage (1) Limits on Use An accessory structure may be constructed or used solely for noncommercial hobbies or amusements, for maintenance of the principal structure or yards, for artistic endeavors such as painting, photography or sculpture, maintenance or mechanical work on vehicles owned or operated by the occupants, for an approved home occupation, or for other similar purposes (2) Floor Area The gross floor area of a detached accessory structure is not to exceed fifty percent (50%) of the gross floor area of the principal structure 78 _ (3) Residential accessory structures 120 square feet or less are exempt from requiring a permit if the structure is incidental to the primary use and meets the following requirements. (i) The structure does not create a nuisance (ii) The use of the structure is permitted under its zoning, (iii) The structure meets the property's rear and side yard minimum setback requirement of three (3) feet if the structure less than twelve (12) feet in height; (iv) If the structure is more than twelve (12) feet in height, standard setback shall be required regardless of exemption, (v) The accessory structure is located outside of the required front yard setback; (vi) A minimum six (6) feet of separation is required between accessory structures regardless of exemption unless otherwise noted by the adopted building code If the accessory structures have less than a six 6 foot setback the aggregate area of the buildings shall be considered one (1) building and shall require a building permit. (34) Number of Structures The number of non-exempt accessory structures requiring a building permit shall be limited to two (2) structures (c) Mini-bike, motorcycle, dirt bike or similar two (2) or more wheel motor vehicle riding is allowed subject to the following limitations (1) No more than two (2) such vehicles shall be operating at the same time (2) Operation is limited to a maximum of two (2) hours in a day (i) This limit applies even if only one (1) such vehicle is being operated (3) Operation is limited to a maximum of eight (8) hours in a week. (i) This limit applies even if only one (1) such vehicle is operated (ii) A week shall be measured from Monday through Sunday (4) Notwithstanding the above, no such use shall be allowed prior to noon on Sundays 1"0 79 (5) Any violations to the above-mentioned limitations are subject to cost recovery for responses to disturbances, as listed in Section 9-14 14 (d) Exceptions to Accessory Structure Standards (1) Detached accessory structures that eXGeed siz rem,ireme # deviate from requirements are subject to the approval of a minor conditional use peFmit-. ep rmit. (2) Any detached accessory structure in excess of the two (2) structures permitted or when multiple exempt accessory structures (less than 120 square feet) are constructed on the premise that are no longer accessory uses to the primary unit as determined by the Community Development Director is subject to the approval of a minor conditional use permit. (Ord 454 § 3 (part), 2004 Ord 449 § 1, 2004, Ord 412 § 3, 2003 Ord 68 § 9-6 106, 1983) 9-6 121 Churches and related activities Religious meeting facilities are subject to the following standards (a) Location Church facilities shall be located on a collector or arterial (b) Limitation on Use When located in an RS, RSF or LSF Zone, related activities may be limited to a Sunday school, an accessory residence, and small meeting rooms Schools, gyms and facilities other than the sanctuary designed for large gatherings may be prohibited (G) Interiim� , „ce gi in the GS and GPK ZGRes A nh„rnh may he allowed ed asa + an RtPrhm Use in the (1) Related aGthvitieS shall be 4nited te a SURday 6Ghool and small meeting reG, , (2) Days and hewF6 of operatiGn shall be limited to Sundays and week nights e)densien RGt to eX-GeNye (2) years.r(QFd 169 § 7 (paFt) Exh r 1988. QFd 68 § 9_ 6.121, 98.3) 9-6 131 ReGYGIinq and srr-ap Storage, Recycling and Dismantling of Vehicles and Materials. (a) Location At least five hundred (500) feet from any school, church, hospital, public building, commercial, or residential zone 80 (b) Minimum Site Area One acre (c) Parking Requirement. Two (2) spaces, plus one space for each five thousand (5000) square feet of use area (d) Site Design and Operation All outdoor and indoor Recycling facilities,and wrecking yards, and impound lots are subject to all provisions of Section 9-6 140 (Ord 68 § 9-6 131, 1983) 9-6 140 Storage yards Outdoor storage yards, inGluding excluding the storage of vehicles in ether than a day use parking lot or garage, are subject to the provisions of this section The storage of vehicles in a public or commercial parking lot or garage is subject to Section 9-4 114, the storage of wrecked,eFabandoned vehisle6,or vehicles being dismantled, is subject to Section 9-6 131, in addition to this section (a) Site Design Standards (1) Access There shall be only one access point to a storage yard for each three hundred (300) feet of street frontage Such access point is to be a maximum width of twenty (20) feet and shall be provided with a solid gate or door (2) Screening A storage yard, except a temporary offsite construction yard, is to be screened from public view on all sides by solid wood, painted metal or masonry fencing, with a minimum height of six (6) feet. All required screening shall be continuously maintained in good condition to assure that its intended purpose is accomplished This requirement may be waived through adjustment (Section 9-1 112), when (i) The side of a storage yard abuts a railroad right-of-way; or (ii) The surrounding terrain, existing vegetation intended to remain or other conditions would make fencing ineffective or unnecessary for the purpose of screening the storage yard from the view of public roads (3) Parking Requirement. None, provided that sufficient usable area is available to accommodate all employee and user parking needs entirely on-site (4) Site Surfacing A storage yard shall be surfaced with concrete, asphalt paving, crushed rock, or oiled earth, and be maintained in a dust-free condition (5) Office Facilities When no buildings exist or are proposed on a storage yard site, one commercial coach may be utilized for an office, provided that such vehicle is equipped with skirting, and installed pursuant to the permit requirements of Title 8 of this Code (the building and construction ordinance) 81 (b) Operation Except for vehicles or freestanding equipment, materials within a storage yard are not to be stacked or stored higher than six (6) feet, unless screening requirements have been waived or modified pursuant to subsection (a)(2)(ii) of this section, or unless a higher wall or fence is constructed at the required setback line under an approved building permit. (Ord 68 § 9-6 140, 1983) 9-6 142 individual mobs lehomesManufactured Homes When used for permanent residential occupancy, "Rdiv+dual mobolehemesmanufactured homes are subject to the standards of this section, in addition to Title 8 of this Code ( Building) AAehileheme6 Manufactured homes used as temporary offices or dwellings are subject to Section 9-6 172 et seq Mobilehomes Manufactured homes in mobileheme-sales lots are subject to Section 9-6 139 (a) Location A manufactured home n ffiRdividual mebilehGrne is to be located as follows (1) Within an approved mobilehome park or subdivision, (2) On any single-family residential parcel abjeot-subiect to the meb+teheme +dardemanufactured home standards specified in subsection (b) of this section (b) Mebileheme-Manufactured Home Standards (1) The-If a manufactured home is considered a mobilehome, the structure shall be certified under the National Mobilehome Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (2) The manufactured home shall be placed on an approved permanent foundation system An approved foundation system shall include any foundation system approved by the State Department of Housing and Community Development or any foundation designed by an engineer or architect in compliance with applicable provisions of the UnifeFm adopted Building Code (3) {?eef everhang6 reefing material and 9)derier siding WhiGh ish-All P-)de R.d to the gFOURd shall be GOmpatible with etheF dwelliRgs existing within the SUFFOURding aFe-a- At the time of permit application, the Planning Director shall review the architectural features and treatment of the proposed , manufactured home with similar features on existing dwelling within the area and shall metro the mehileheme semffa#+f31e The decision of the Planning Director may be appealed to the Planning Commission and the decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council, as set forth in Section 9-1 111 82 (4) MebilehomesManufactured homes shall have a minimum width of tweRty fifteen (2-G15) feet. Manufactured homes with widths less than fifteen (15) feet may be permitted with approval by the Design Review Committee. (64) Utility connections including water, sewer, gas and electric shall be made permanent in the same manner as conventional housing Utility shutoff valves shall be accessible and shall not be located under the mehilehemes „ror behind siding or skirting of a manufactured home (65) No additions or other structural modifications shall be made to the mobeleheme structure without prior approval from the State Department of Housing and Gernml Inity Development apnd the AtaSGa dere Planning 1lopar-tmen4the City (76) An application shall include all information necessary to comply with State of California regulations, as well as other permit information and fees established by the City for its processing of a rnebilehomeof an application 3e items aFe not available, the G)WReF shall submit tG the Git" 11 „ that these items are missing or lest. WheR the mobileh i and has neveF been registeFed with the DepaFtmeRt of Meter VehiGles, the ewneF shall submit te the City a 1400, mebmieheme ie new and has never been registered! IIVIIIV IV ,IV�• MI,M M VYVI AJVVTZTVT�TJiI I-C>� (c) Storage Unoccupied mebiiel}emes-manufactured homes that are not fixed to a foundation or a prepared permanent site are to be stored only in a mebileheme sales lot, a storage yard, or in a mobilehome park. (Ord 68 § 9-6 142, 1983) 9--6.183 Veh"Gle storage. This seGtiGR applies tG GGMmeFGial paFk*Rg 19tS, garage and other establishments ZORes are to be limited tG the temperaFy parking of autemobiles, buses and se4f- .400 83 Chapter 7 Non-Conforming Uses 9-7 113 Nonconforming lot defined Any lot having an area less than the smallest minimum parcel size required by this title or other ordinances, is a legal nonconforming lot if- (a) The lot is shown on a duly approved and recorded subdivision or parcel map, or (b) The lot has, ^r 06 ^'i^ihbeen issued; a certificate of compliance or a conditional certificate of compliance 9-7 114 Use of nonconforming_lots A legal nonconforming lot may be used developed for muses identified as an allowable or conditional use by GhapteFTitle 9-3-provided the minimum site development standards established in Chapt^•c ° 3 and ° for a6 particular uses are 06 are satisfied This includes structures that are partially or completely destroyed that are conforming uses. .ses. , 84 SECTION 3 A summary of this ordinance, approved by the City Attorney, together with the ayes and noes, shall be published twice at least five days prior to its final passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper published and circulated in the City of Atascadero, and, before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its final passage, in the Atascadero News, a newspaper published and circulated in the City of Atascadero A copy of the full text of this ordinance shall be on file in the City Clerk's Office on and after the date following introduction and passage and shall be available to any interested member of the public INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on , and PASSED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero, State of California, on by the following roll call vote AYES NOES ABSTAIN ABSENT CITY OF ATASCADERO *40,00 Roberta Fonzi, Mayor ATTEST Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.0 , City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney 85 ITEM NUMBER. B -2 DATE 08/10/10 I ais�1 r r a Atascadero City Council Staff Report— Fire Department Confirming the Cost of Vegetative Growth and/or Refuse Abatement RECOMMENDATION Council adopt the Draft Resolution, confirming the cost of vegetative growth (weeds) and/or refuse (rubbish) abatement. DISCUSSION On April 27, 2010 Council adopted Resolution No 2010-018, declaring vegetative growth and/or refuse a public nuisance, and authorized the Fire Chief to proceed with the abatement process On April 29, 2010 notices were mailed to property owners, informing them of the City's abatement requirements An itemized list of the abatement assessments were posted with the City Clerk and at the Fire Department. A total of 132 parcels were abated FISCAL IMPACT The City will receive $124,950 00 from the 2010/2011 property tax rolls in weed abatement/ refuse abatement assessments ATTACHMENTS 1 Draft Resolution 2 Abatement Assessments City FY 09/10 ;%WW 3 Abatement Assessments City FY 10/11 86 ITEM NUMBER. B -2 DATE 08/10/10 *400 DRAFT RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE COST OF VEGETATIVE GROWTHIREFUSE ABATEMENT WHEREAS, the Government Code of the State of California, Section 39500, et seq , provides that cities may declare vegetative growth (weeds) and refuse (rubbish) a public nuisance for the purpose of vegetative growth (weeds) and refuse (rubbish) abatement; and WHEREAS, the Atascadero City Fire Department did abate said nuisances within the provision of the Government Code, Section 39500, et seq , and WHEREAS, the cost of the work of abatement, including a 150% administrative fee, as shown on the Preliminary Special Tax Listing for 2010/2011 Tax Roll was submitted in accordance with Government Code Section 39574, and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Atascadero received the cost report and held a hearing to receive objections of any property owners liable to be assessed for the work of abatement. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Atascadero SECTION 1 That the report of abatement costs is confirmed as presented, and SECTION 2. That the costs of abatement constitutes a special assessment against the described parcels and shall be a lien on the property in accordance with Government Code Section 39577, and SECTION 3. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit to the proper officials of the County, a certified copy of the report for filing. On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member ,the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote AYES NOES ABSENT ADOPTED- 87 ITEM NUMBER. B -2 DATE 08/10/10 CITY OF ATASCADERO By- Roberta Fonzi,Mayor ATTEST Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney fir✓ 88 ITEM NUMBER. B -2 DATE. 08/10/10 ABATEMENT ASSESSMENTS CITY FY 2009/2010 CO TAX ROLL 2010/2011 l3ate at Contractor'' .Admin TotaI bfss Counter AI'N Gust' Fee Abatemer� Abatement.. _ Fee Asessr :ebt Book 28 9/17/09 028-162-021 $ 180 00 $ 270 00 $ 450 00 $ 200 $ 452.00 Total (Book 28) $18000 $ 270 00 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 Book 29 $ - Total (Book 29) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Book 30 6/10/10 030-261-011 $ 36000 $ 54000 $ 90000 $ 2.00 $ 902.00 6/4/10 030-281-014 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 6/4/10 030-281-015 $ 12000 $ 18000 $ 30000 $ 2.00 $ 302.00 6/4/10 030-281-016 $ 6000 $ 9000 $ 15000 $ 2.00 $ 152.00 7/15/09 030-282-003 $ 36000 $ 54000 $ 90000 $ 2.00 $ 902.00 7/15/09 030-282-024 $ 60000 $ 90000 $1,50000 $ 2.00 $ 1,502.00 6/4/10 030-283-007 $ 48000 $ 72000 $1,20000 $ 2.00 $ 1,202.00 6/4/10 030-283-008 $1,20000 $ 1,80000 $3,000 00 $ 2.00 $ 3,002.00 7/17/09 030-421-001 $ 42000 $ 63000 $1,05000 $ 2.00 $ 1,052.00 Total (Book 30) $3,78000 $5,67000 $9,450.00 $18.00 $ 9,46800 Book 31 Book 31 (continued) $ - 6/7/10 031-161-044 $ 6000 $ 9000 $ 15000 $ 2.00 $ 152.00 6/7/10 031-161-045 $ 6000 $ 9000 $ 15000 $ 2.00 $ 152.00 6/7/10 031-161-046 $ 6000 $ 9000 $ 15000 $ 2.00 $ 152.00 6/7/10 031-161-047 $ 6000 $ 9000 $ 15000 $ 2.00 $ 152.00 6/7/10 031-161-048 $ 6000 $ 9000 $ 15000 $ 2.00 $ 152.00 6/7/10 031-161-049 $ 6000 $ 9000 $ 15000 $ 2.00 $ 152.00 6/7/10 031-161-050 $ 12000 $ 18000 $ 30000 $ 2.00 $ 302.00 6/7/10 031-161-051 $ 6000 $ 9000 $ 15000 $ 2.00 $ 152.00 6/8/10 031-231-002 $ 42000 $ 63000 $1,05000 $ 2.00 $ 1,052.00 7/15/09 031-231-028 $ 72000 $1,08000 $1,80000 $ 2.00 $ 1,802.00 6/28/10 031-231-028 $ 84000 $1,26000 $2,10000 $ 2.00 $ 2,102.00 89 ITEM NUMBER. B -2 DATE 08/10/10 ;yam, 6/29/10 031-244-010 $ 78000 $1,17000 $1,95000 $ 2.00 $ 1,952.00 Total (Book 31) $ 3,300 00 $ 4,950.00 $ 8,250.00 $ 24 00 $ 8,27400 Book 45 6/11/10 045-321-020 $1,02000 $1,53000 $2,55000 $ 2.00 $ 2,552.00 6/11/10 045-321-022 $1,44000 $2,16000 $3,60000 $ 2.00 $ 3,602.00 Total (Book 45) $2,46000 $3,69000 $6,150.00 $ 400 $ 6,15400 Book 49 6/23/10 049-033-042 $ 162000 $2430 00 $405000 $ 200 $ 4,052.00 6/18/10 049-047-001 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 6/18/10 049-047-002 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 6/18/10 049-047-003 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 6/18/10 049-047-004 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 6/18/10 049-047-005 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 6/18/10 049-047-006 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 6/18/10 049-047-007 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 6/19/10 049-047-008 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 6/19/10 049-047-009 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 200 $ 452.00 6/19/10 049-047-010 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 6/19/10 049-047-011 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 200 $ 452.00 6/19/10 049-047-012 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 200 $ 452.00 6/19/10 049-047-013 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 6/19/10 049-047-014 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 6/20/10 049-047-015 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 200 $ 452.00 6/20/10 049-047-016 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 200 $ 452.00 6/20/10 049-047-017 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 6/20/10 049-047-018 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 6/20/10 049-047-019 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 200 $ 452.00 6/20/10 049-047-020 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 200 $ 452.00 6/20/10 049-047-021 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 200 $ 452.00 6/21/10 049-047-022 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 6/21/10 049-047-023 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 6/21/10 049-047-024 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 6/21/10 049-047-025 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 6/21/10 049-047-026 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 7/13/09 049-071-017 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 '14W 7/17/09 049-071-026 $42000 $63000 $1,05000 $ 2 00 $ 1,052.00 90 ITEM NUMBER. B -2 DATE. 08/10/10 6/23/10 049-071-026 $60000 $90000 $1,50000 $ 2.00 $ 1,502.00 7/13/09 049-073-009 $42000 $63000 $1,050 00 $ 2.00 $ 1,052.00 6/17/10 049-101-012 $12000 $ 18000 $30000 $ 200 $ 302.00 Book 49 (continued) 6/17/10 049-104-010 $12000 $ 18000 $30000 $ 200 $ 302.00 6/17/10 049-104-013 $12000 $ 18000 $30000 $ 2.00 $ 302.00 6/17/10 049-104-014 $12000 $ 18000 $30000 $ 2.00 $ 302.00 6/17/10 049-104-017 $12000 $ 18000 $30000 $ 2.00 $ 302.00 6/17/10 049-104-019 $12000 $ 18000 $30000 $ 2.00 $ 302.00 6/17/10 049-112-005 $1,26000 $1,89000 $3,15000 $ 200 $ 3,152.00 6/8/10 049-223-033 $60000 $90000 $1,50000 $ 200 $ 1,502.00 7/20/09 049-231-005 $30000 $ 45000 $75000 $ 200 $ 752.00 7/21/09 049-241-043 $12000 $ 18000 $30000 $ 2.00 $ 302.00 Total (Book 49) $10,92000 $16,38000 $27,30000 1 $ 82.00 $ 27,382.00 Book 50 7/16-09 050-031-048 $ 42000 $ 63000 $1,05000 $ 2.00 $ 1,052.00 7/20/09 050-031-052 $ 6000 $ 9000 $ 15000 $ 200 $ 152.00 7/14/09 050-221-023 $ 78000 $1,17000 $1,95000 $ 2.00 $ 1,952.00 7/20/09 050-331-002 $ 24000 $ 36000 $ 60000 $ 200 $ 602.00 $ - Total (Book 50) $ 1,50000 $ 2,250.00 $3,750.00 $ 8.00 $ 3,758.00 Book 54 6/8/10 054-043-006 $ 1,98000 $ 2,97000 $4,95000 $ 2.00 $ 4,952.00 7/14/09 054-162-004 $ 1,02000 $ 1,53000 $2,55000 $ 200 $ 2,552.00 7/21/09 054-192-002 $ 30000 $ 45000 $ 75000 $ 200 $ 752.00 7/21/09 054-192-020 $ 24000 $ 36000 $ 60000 $ 2.00 $ 602.00 Total (Book 54) $ 3,5400T0 $ 5,310 00 $8,850.00 $ 8.00 $ 8,858.00 Book 55 7/22/09 055-341-008 $ 300 00 $ 450 00 $ 75000 -$ 200 $ 752.00 7/22/09 055-361-009 $ 12000 $ 18000 $ 30000 $ 2.00 $ 302.00 Total (Book 55) $ 420 00 $ 630 00 $1,050.00 $ 4 00 $ 1,054 00 Book 56 7/22/09 056-162-034 $900 00 1 $1,35000 $2,250 00 j $ 2.00 1 $ 2,252.00 91 ITEM NUMBER. B -2 DATE 08/10/10 7/21/09 056-312-025 $30000 $45000 $75000 $ 2.00 $ 752.00 Total (Book $ $ 56) 1,200.00 1,80000 $3,000.00 $ 400 $ 3,00400 Gran T to $ ,�ttt l00.001, 1-1`68"2'0"0' � $154,0W � �8j40 ��?0 92 ITEM NUMBER. B -2 DATE 08/10/10 ABATEMENT ASSESSMENTS CITY FY 2010/2011 CO TAX ROLL 2010/2011 wi Total Coit , Date o1 Contractor ,`iAdm.in 'Of Cou r J" rN Abatement AM Fee ►batement" Fae .. .;Assessment: Book 28 7/16/10 028-042-050 $ 36000 $ 54000 $ 90000 $ 2.00 $ 902.00 7/22/10 028-071-047 $ 42000 $ 63000 $ 1,05000 $ 2.00 $ 1,052.00 7/16/10 028-271-013 $ 12000 $ 18000 $ 30000 $ 2.00 $ 302.00 7/16/10 028-292-013 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 7/16/10 028-331-006 $ 6000 $ 9000 $ 15000 $ 2.00 $ 152.00 Total (Book 28) $ 1,14000 $ 1,71000 $ 2,85000 $ 10.00 $ 2,86000 Book 29 7/26/10 029-302-028 $ 24000 $ 36000 $ 60000 $ 2.00 $ 602.00 7/7/10 029-347-020 $ 12000 $ 18000 $ 30000 $ 2.00 $ 302.00 Total (Book 29) $ 36000 $ 54000 $ 90000 $ 400 $ 90400 Book 30 , 7/27/10 030-101-042 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 7/14/10 030-123-034 $ 54000 $ 81000 $ 1,35000 $ 2.00 $ 1,352.00 7/14/10 030-421-001 $ 24000 $ 36000 $ 60000 $ 2.00 $ 602.00 7/14/10 030-491-001 $ 6000 $ 9000 $ 15000 $ 2.00 $ 152.00 7/14/10 030-511-001 $ 48000 $ 72000 $ 1,20000 $ 2.00 $ 1,202.00 Total (Book 30) $ 1,50000 $ 2,25000 $ 3,75000 $ 10 00 $ 3,76000 Book 31 7/17/10 031-071-021 $ 30000 $ 45000 $ 75000 $ 2.00 $ 752.00 7/15/10 031-114-001 $ 36000 $ 54000 $ 90000 $ 2.00 $ 902.00 7/15/10 031-114-005 $ 30000 $ 45000 $ 75000 $ 2.00 $ 752.00 7/15/10 031-121-001 $ 42000 $ 63000 $ 1,05000 $ 2.00 $ 1,052.00 Total (Book 31) $ 1,38000 $ 2,07000 $ 3,45000 $ 8.00 $ 3,458.00 Book 45 7/24/10 045-311-008 $ 1,56000 $ 2,340 00 $ 3,900 00 $ 2.00 $ 3,902.00 7/24/10 045-311-015 $ 1,14000 $ 1,71000 $ 2,85000 $ 2.00 $ 2,852.00 93 ITEM NUMBER. B -2 DATE 08/10110 `4w 7/12/10 045-342-009 $ 1,380 00 $ 2,070 00 $ 3,45000 $ 2.00 $ 3,452.00 7/26/10 045-357-020 $ 6000 $ 9000 $ 15000 $ 2.00 $ 152.00 7/16/10 045-441-024 $ 24000 A 36000 $ 60000 $ 2.00 $ 602.00 $ - Total (Book $ 45) $4.38000 $ 6,57000 10,950.00 $ 10 00 $10,960.00 Book 49 7/23/10 049-104-006 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 7/23/10 049-104-007 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 200 $ 452.00 7/23/10 049-104-021 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 7/23/10 049-104-022 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 7/23/10 049-104-023 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 7/23/10 049-104-024 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 7/23/10 049-104-025 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 7/23/10 049-104-026 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 7/23/10 049-104-031 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 7/26/10 049-225-008 $ 6000 $ 9000 $ 15000 $ 2.00 $ 152.00 7/19/10 049-271-002 $ 12000 $ 18000 $ 30000 $ 2.00 $ 302.00 7/19/10 049-271-024 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 7/19/10 049-281-005 $ 6000 $ 9000 $ 15000 $ 2.00 $ 152.00 Total (Book 49) $ 2,04000 $ 3,06000 $ 5,10000 $ 26.00 $ 5,126.00 Book 50 Book 50 7/19/10 050-021-037 $ 6000 $ 9000 $ 15000 $ 2.00 $ 152.00 7/10/10 050-081-001 $ 90000 $ 1,35000 $ 2,25000 $ 2.00 $ 2,252.00 7/10/10 050-091-021 $ 54000 $ 81000 $ 1,35000 $ 2.00 $ 1,352.00 7/9/10 050-181-002 $ 1,32000 $ 1,98000 $ 3,30000 $ 2.00 $ 3,302.00 7/20/10 050-242-003 $ 84000 $ 1,26000 $ 2,10000 $ 2.00 $ 2,102.00 7/2/10 050-312-013 $ 1,14000 $ 1,71000 $ 2,85000 $ 2.00 $ 2,852.00 7/10/10 050-312-017 $ 54000 $ 81000 $ 1,35000 $ 2.00 $ 1,352.00 7/19/10 050-331-002 $ 18000 $ 27000 $ 45000 $ 2.00 $ 452.00 7/17/10 050-341-006 $ 48000 $ 72000 $ 1,20000 $ 2.00 $ 1,202.00 7/1/10 050-362-006 $ 96000 $ 1,440 00 $ 2,400 00 $ 2.00 $ 2,402.00 Total (Book 50) 1 $ 6,96000 $10,440.00 $17,400.00 $ 20.00 $17,420.00 Book 54 7/21/10 054-091-026 $ 1,680 00 $ 2,520 00 $4,200 00 $ 2.00 $ 4,202.00 *✓ 94 ITEM NUMBER. B —2 DATE. 08/10/10 7/19/10 054-192-023 $ 6000 $ 9000 $ 15000 $ 2.00 $ 152.00 7/20/10 054-231-044 $ 36000 $ 54000 $ 90000 $ 2.00 $ 902.00 7/19/10 054-301-019 $ 12000 $ 18000 $ 30000 $ 2.00 $ 302.00 7/19/10 054-301-020 $ 12000 $ 18000 $ 30000 $ 2.00 $ 302.00 7/27/10 054-311-049 $ 54000 $ 81000 $ 1,35000 $ 2.00 $ 1,352.00 Total (Book 54) $ 2,88000 $ 4,32000 $ 7,20000 $ 12.00 $ 7,212.00 Book 56 7/16/10 056-091-051 $ 36000 $ 54000 $ 90000 $ 2.00 $ 902.00 7/19/10 056-301-009 $ 96000 $ 1,44000 $ 2,40000 $ 2.00 $ 2,402.00 7/15/10 056-312-007 $ 12000 $ 18000 $ 30000 $ 2.00 $ 302.00 7/17/10 056-402-010 $ 6000 $ 9000 $ 15000 $ 2.00 $ 152.00 7/17/10 056-491-006 $ 54000 $ 81000 $ 1,35000 $ 2.00 $ 1,352.00 Total (Book 56) $ 2,04000 $ 3,06000 $ 5,10000 $ 10.00 $ 5,110.00 a ' .Ci,TtaJ" $22£68a« . .$34 �t3 95 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE 08/10/10 '1918'I r r ,."! r 1979 Atascadero City Council Staff Report— Community Development Department Eagle Ranch Specific Plan Council Direction on Processing of Specific Plan, Environmental Impact Report, and Public Review Process PLN 2008-1280 / GPA 2008-0022 / SP 2008-0002 / ZCH 2008-0150 (Eagle Ranch, LLC / RRM Design Group) RECOMMENDATIONS Council 1 Endorse the Eagle Ranch public participation and project processing outline (Attachment 1), and, 2 Direct staff to issue requests for proposals (RFPs) for an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Eagle Ranch Specific Plan Project. REPORT-IN-BRIEF The Eagle Ranch Specific Plan proposes the annexation of an undeveloped 3,450± acre area adjacent to Atascadero's southern boundary, to the City of Atascadero The majority of the site is part of the Historic Atascadero Colony and contains approximately 452± undeveloped Colony lots and a network of un-built Colony roads, originally established by E G Lewis' 1914 Atascadero Colony Map The Specific Plan will propose reconfiguring these existing lots and roadways, and will identify a variety of land uses including housing, commercial uses, parks, trails, open space, and tourist- serving facilities The applicant has requested authorization from the City to initiate the EIR process concurrently with the development of the project design and Specific Plan The concurrent processing is proposed in order to incorporate the studies and findings of the EIR into the early stages of the project design A timeline for the concurrent processing of the EIR and Specific Plan and a schedule for public participation is provided for Council authorization 96 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE 08/10/10 Project Summary' 1 Applicant: RRM Design Group, Victor Montgomery 3765 S Higuera Street, Ste 102 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 2 Owner- Eagle Ranch, LLC P O Box 25010 Ventura, CA 93002 3 Project Addresses See attached maps 4 Assessor Parcel Numbers See project files 5 General Plan Designations Unincorporated within Sphere of Influence Identified for future annexation 6 Zoning District: No City zoning districts or pre-zonings have been established 7 Project Area 3,460 acres 8 Existing Use Cattle Ranch 97 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE 08/10/10 DISCUSSION Background. Eagle Ranch is an undeveloped 3,450± acre 4, area located adjacent to Atascadero's Atascadero southern boundary The majority of the site is part of the Historic Atascadero Colony which "•• ,+ contains approximately 452± undeveloped •""'•••. Colony lots The area has been used 41 historically for ranching and agricultural w .,....,g,.•.„ purposes and includes numerous structures ,, has Eagle Ranch that were used for these purposes The site is Mcr, characterized by sloping, oak covered hillsides y�f and many areas with extremely steep, ••• mountainous terrain Other unique features tx or 5$ include the headwaters of Atascadero Creek . Santa Margarita which originate on the ranch Eagle Ranch Site Area with Existing Colony Lots and Roads ;p h . ° � j+ ,� �apbWnd�Bpeo�IcPl�nwea , t A YMIIMIrIA = 9y N44 9 98,M � 7 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE 08/10/10 The City's 2002 General Plan identifies the Eagle Ranch property as a future master plan area to include reconfiguration/clustering of existing colony lots and roadways, resort facilities, and inclusion of public open space, conservation easements, trails, and recreation areas, prior to annexation into the City (see following policies) The General Plan requires that a Specific Plan be approved by the City to provide a comprehensive development plan for the property that addresses issues including • Clustering of colony lots • Public facilities • Circulation facilities • Parks • Open space • Conservation easements • Resort facilities • Fiscal analysis of service costs General Plan Policies related to Eagle Ranch LOC 1.2.8 Cooperate with LAFCO and the County to incorporate the Eagle Ranch into the City's Sphere of Influence for eventual annexation (Completed in 2003) LOC 1.2.9 It is the City's position, that Eagle Ranch shall be developed within the City 141001 and any development of the site prior to annexation will be opposed. LOC 1.2.10 Prior to the annexation of Eagle Ranch a Specific Plan shall be approved by the City which will provide a comprehensive development plan for the property that address issues including, clustering of Colony lots, public facilities, circulation facilities, parks, open space, conservation easements, and a fiscal analysis of service costs. LOC 1.2.11 Update and maintain the Zoning Ordinance to designate the Eagle Ranch property as a future Specific Plan area to be subject to future environmental and site-specific review prior to annexation. Table H-5: Nfaster Plan of Development Overlay Areas. 0 v nl�V QTR 3�i�tia�lixlr�l�ensliy t*+�� ate$= 11 Eagle Ranch annexation Development of existing 400 0 Specific;Plan required colony lots 0 Hat=colony lots and roads to be reconfigured and clustered to minimize impacts. • Public open space trails and parics to be provided. TTThe General Plan identifies Eagle Ranch Resort r'aalsf'es as Master Plan of Development Area #11 99 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE 08/10/10 On June 24, 2003, the City approved bringing the Eagle Ranch property within the City's Sphere of Influence, consistent with the City's General Plan Policy LOC 1 2 8 The current Eagle Ranch General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan application represents the next step in the planning and entitlement process Project Applications The Eagle Ranch Specific Plan project will require the following entitlements from the City of Atascadero • General Plan Amendment • Prezoning • Annexation / LAFCO reorganization • Specific Plan • Vesting Tentative Tract Map • Multiple Conditional Use Permits • Environmental Impact Report On May 27, 2008, the City Council approved a resolution to authorize the processing of a General Plan Amendment and begin the annexation process for the Eagle Ranch project (Attachment 4) Community Meetings With the 2008 authorization, Council directed staff to initiate the General Plan Amendment to be reviewed and processed in a manner to facilitate citizen participation and public outreach as an important component of the planning process The property owners of the Eagle Ranch held a neighborhood "Open House" on January 17, 2008, at the Lake Pavilion where the public met the owners and their project development team City staff was also available to answer questions and listen to the community's thoughts and ideas The applicant provided background information on the history of the ranch and the preliminary project concepts Suggestions from the community for land uses beyond residential development ranged from provisions for open space, parks, trails, equestrian center and dude ranch to a high-end hotel with spa and wine tasting facilities On September 25, 2008, a second community meeting was held at the Lake Pavilion The owners and their project development team presented the opportunities and constraints within the project, as well as conceptual land use possibilities at this meeting City staff was available to answer questions and listen to the community The public was able to provide comments at the meeting through a digital survey which provided questions and images of possible project design components and land use options In 2009 the applicants and their project development team continued working on a conceptual layout and preliminary project proposal Conceptual design analysis has 100 ITEM NUMBER. C - 1 DATE 08/10/10 taken into consideration the information from the two previous public meetings, as well as further site mapping of the project site, including trees, slopes, historic resources, and other site analysis and constraints In early 2010, the applicant contacted City staff to discuss restarting work on the project. Staff has been meeting with the applicant over the past several months in order to work out some preliminary project design issues, and create a process for moving the project forward with the Specific Plan, EIR, and public participation Analysis. Project Description A conceptual project description and preliminary land use plan have been developed by the applicant based on the site constraints, previous community meetings, as well as preliminary meetings with staff and the Council As proposed, the project would use a clustered approach in order to minimize the impact on the site and maximize open space Preliminary surveys and analysis have been conducted to identify major site constraints Steep slopes, historical and cultural resources, native trees, creeks, riparian areas, wetlands, and areas of potential biological importance have been identified and mapped A constraints map has been provided by the applicant to identify areas to be avoided and areas most feasible for development. Constraints Map , Dark areas indicate unconstrained areas best , suited for development �yf Grey areas are suited for ,r �.f""' open space. r ��t+ �N�`�,. P,rDfect Area 3;4-66 Acts a T ,*,w ■anon W r MOWr 40ino a W,no=* ■,* lrvtdirlttttti. to 101 ITEM NUMBER: C- 1 DATE 08/10/10 Conceptual Land Use Plan The applicant has identified the following major project components ■ Single-family Residential — Preliminary, 452 colony lots reconfigured into clustered lots ranging from 8,000 square feet to 1 acre ■ Village Center— small scale retail, offices in middle of project. ■ Multi-Family Residential — Preliminarily, 90 multi-family dwellings including affordable units and senior housing near the Village and Park. ■ Highway Commercial — along US 101/Santa Barbara interchange ■ Resort Hotel —Tourism component. ■ Parks — A neighborhood public park is proposed adjacent to a creek side setting and within walking distance of the Village ■ Open Space — The majority of the 3,500 acre site is proposed to remain as open space to be utilized for agricultural activities and conservation ■ Schools — reviewing the need for a possible school site at Eagle Ranch ■ Roads — Roads are, to the extent practicable, aligned to coincide with existing ranch roads ■ Trails — Public pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian trails are proposed and conceptually designed to lead to the Village Center and to connect with the i%W surrounding neighborhood Conceptual Land Use Plan Landscape Buffer •�,I+ 1r v w. ► � •'. ' Ott t f -; , 102 ITEM NUMBER. C - 1 DATE. 08/10/10 The conceptual land use plan closely mirrors the areas identified as having the least environmental constraints such as slopes, creeks, and native trees The preliminary land use map identifies potential locations for the roads, trails, commercial, development, residential areas, and possible connections to existing City roads Specific Plan The adoption of a Specific Plan is necessary in order to develop and implement a master plan to regulate development within the overall project area The Specific Plan will become the regulatory framework that implements the General Plan and its policies/programs, as well as, establishes the standards by which development shall occur within the plan area Specifically, it would incorporate precise design standards and guidelines that could provide flexibility by superseding the City's existing Zoning Code, Public Works standards, and other regulations Most importantly, the specific plan would also provide policies for the installation and financing of infrastructure throughout the project area The City's General Plan identifies specific plans as the preferred method to implement large planning projects in Atascadero General Plan policy requires specific plans for all projects involving more than 100 residential dwelling units An easy way to understand a Specific Plan is that it is similar to a Planned Development Overlay (PD) PDs, however, are limited to use on parcels under a single ownership and cannot regulate off-site infrastructure and financing requirements Specific plans were created in State law to accommodate master planning of larger planning areas with complex infrastructure and financing requirements A specific plan creates a bridge between the broad policies of the General Plan and the specific regulations of the Zoning Ordinance while providing flexibility within the existing zoning codes and creating site-specific standards and requirements The Eagle Ranch Specific Plan will be prepared and funded by the applicant's project development team and will be reviewed by City staff Environmental Review/ CEQA Due to the size and scope of the proposed project, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will be required in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) The EIR will contain analysis of the proposed project as well as various project alternatives that could feasibly attain most of the project objectives Among the factors that may be taken into account when addressing the feasibility of alternatives are site suitability, economic viability, availability of infrastructure, General Plan consistency, other plans or regulatory limitations, and jurisdictional boundaries The EIR would also include a "no project" alternative which would allow the Council to compare the impacts of approving the proposed project with the impacts of not approving the proposed project or any of the project alternatives 100 103 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE. 08/10/10 Concurrent EIR/Specific Plan Process The Eagle Ranch project applicant has requested that the Council authorize the processing of the Eagle Ranch EIR simultaneously with the development of the Specific Plan in order to incorporate the EIR analysis and recommendations in the early phases of the project design Often, EIRs are processed after a project has been completely designed, leading to discovery of issues late in the process which may require major redesign of the project, or a series of mitigation measures applied to "fix" the projects shortcomings The staff and the applicant believes that by conducting the EIR review early in the planning process, the project design can easily incorporate the observations, technical information, and recommendations of independent environmental professionals as part of the basic project design and Specific Plan Self-Mitigating Plan The applicant has completed many environmental and site analyses through project consultants already, however, the EIR process requires an independent EIR consultant to further investigate and analyze many of these studies through the CEQA process Through the traffic study, economic analysis, archeological study, biological study, and other analysis required by the EIR, the conceptual site plan can be refined and developed according to the EIR consultant's recommendations Staff believes that this concurrent Specific Plan / EIR approach will create a more environmentally conscious site plan and a more comprehensive project design Issues such as the location and number of road connections, location width and of roads and trails, amount of commercial space, size of lots, and other major project design features can be developed in the initial phases to meet the recommendations of the EIR findings This concurrent approach reduces the amount of major redesign that is often required after the EIR analysis is complete The applicant sees this concurrent approach as a proactive, effective, and efficient approach to identifying environmental issues Independent EIR Consultant Due to the comprehensive scope of an EIR, its preparation would require an experienced and qualified professional consultant under contract and management by the City In order to ensure compliance with CEQA regulations, the City (not the applicant) would contract directly with the environmental consultant. The cost of preparing the EIR and Specific Plan will be the full responsibility of the applicant. The City will directly manage the environmental consultant and will control the scope of work. A complete EIR will be prepared as required by CEQA, consistent with standard EIR components for public review and comment. Request for Proposal Process The City's Purchasing Policy provides a process for the hiring of professional services consultants Staff will be following the Purchasing Policy to select consultants for the EIR. The first step in the process is the issuance of a Request for Proposal (RFP) to qualified consultants requesting a proposal to perform a professional service for the City 104 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE. 08/10/10 City council authorization is requested for staff to issue a Request for Proposals for an EIR consultant. Public Participation Process Under the Council's General Plan Amendment policy, a community participation process is encouraged for General Plan Amendments. Neighborhood meetings are conducted to allow community input on the proposed design and character of the project including the site plan and architecture In 2008, the applicant held two community meetings for the Eagle Ranch project. Two additional neighborhood meetings are proposed to receive input and refined the project design Multiple City Council meetings will be scheduled to review the project as the plans are refined Once the preferred project is selected by the City Council, the EIR consultant will begin the formal EIR scoping process to identify the environmental issues that will be addressed under the EIR. When the Draft Specific Plan and Draft EIR are completed, they will be released simultaneously for public comment and review Following the review process, drafts will be prepared for public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council The timeline spans are projected to be from August 2010 to the end of 2012 105 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE. 08/10/10 err' Eagle Ranch Public Review Process Activity/Event Public Review Opportunity RFP Process Aug Dec 2010 Authorization of EIR consultant process Yes Selection&Retention of EIR Consultant Yes Concept site planning/preliminary road grading/feasibility Project Review and Refinement Jan Jun 2011 Council Review of Concept Plan/ Economics /Issue Scoping Yes Neighborhood meeting#3 Yes Preliminary EIR studies&site environmental investigations Tribal Consulation Process Refine environmental constraints mapping Constraints and Site Planning Integration Refined site plan,constraints&statistics Applicants Neighborhood Meeting#4 Yes Council Selection of Preferred Project Yes Start preparation of Vesting Tentative Map Draft EIR/Specific Plan Jul 2011 Mar 2012 Notice of Preparation(NOP) Yes EIRScoping Council Meeting Yes NOW Preparation&review of Admin. Draft Specific Plan Preparation&review of Draft Specific Plan Begin preparation of Admin draft EIR Timelines for the Planning Commission Review of Draft SP Yes EIR process will be City Council Review of Draft SP Yes developed by the consultants and Preparation of DEIR&Mitigation measures included in the Finalization of Vesting Subdivision Map contracts 45 Day DEIR Public Review Period Yes Response to Public Comments FEIR/Mitigation Monitoring Program Public Hearings April Dec 2012 Planning Comm Hearing GPA,SP and DEIR and VTM Yes City Council Hearing of GPA,SP and DEIR and VTM Yes City prepares&Files Application to LAFCO LAFCO reviews Annexation&Public Hearing Yes go, 106 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE. 08/10/10 Conclusion. The Eagle Ranch Specific Plan offers potential for a well-designed, high quality residential development with increased economic and tourism opportunities for the City Preliminary project design and site analysis have been prepared by the applicant over the past several years The applicant is now requesting to move forward with the development of the Specific Plan in conjunction with the processing of the Environmental Impact Report The concurrent processing of the Specific Plan and EIR will allow the project area to develop to its full potential while minimizing the potential for negative impacts on the community and the environment. This process will include a comprehensive public participation process The EIR will be prepared by a consultant that is hired by the City at the expense of the project applicant. FISCAL IMPACT The fiscal impact of the Specific Plan and EIR process on the City is expected to be minimal The City's cost recovery fees require that planning staff time is covered for the preparation of the Specific Plan and EIR. The project EIR will analyze the fiscal impacts of the project on the City of Atascadero Current City policies require residential portions of a project to be revenue neutral to the City The tourist services and resort components of the project are expected to be revenue positive to the City ALTERNATIVES 1 The City Council may direct staff to modify either the EIR RFP process or the public participation process 2 The City Council may refer the item back to staff for additional analysis or clarification of specific issues The Council should provide direction on issues that require additional analysis ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 Public Participation Outline Attachment 2 May 27, 2008 Council Resolution to process GPA Attachment 3 Eagle Ranch Specific Plan Area Map Attachment 4 Eagle Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Review Correspondence Attachment 5 Eagle Ranch Conceptual Project Description Attachment 6 Eagle Ranch Conceptual Project Statistics Attachment 7 Eagle Ranch Milestones Timeline Attachment 8 Eagle Ranch Existing Lots Attachment 9 Eagle Ranch Conceptual Land Use Plan Attachment 10 Eagle Ranch Conceptual Constraints Plan Attachment 11 Eagle Ranch Suitable Development Areas & Uses, Roads, Trails &Access 107 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE 08/10/10 *4%W Attachment 1 Public Participation Outline Eagle Ranch Public Review Process Activity/Event Public Review Opportunity RFP Process Aug Dec 2010 Authorization of EIR consultant process Yes Selection&Retention of EIR Consultant Yes Concept site planning/preliminary road grading/feasibility Project Review and Refinement Jan Jun 2011 Council Review of Concept Plan/ Economics /Issue Scoping Yes Neighborhood meeting#3 Yes Preliminary EIR studies&site environmental investigations Tribal Consulation Process Refine environmental constraints mapping Constraints and Site Planning Integration Refined site plan,constraints&statistics Applicants Neighborhood Meeting#4 Yes Council Selection of Preferred Project Yes Start preparation of Vesting Tentative Map Draft EIR/Specific Plan Jul 2011 Mar 2012 Notice of Preparation(NOP) Yes EIRScoping Council Meeting Yes Preparation&review of Admin.Draft Specific Plan Preparation&review of Draft Specific Plan Timelines for the Begin preparation of Admin draft EIR EIR process will be developed s the Planning Commission Review of Draft SP Yes consultants and City Council Review of Draft SP Yes included in the Preparation of DEIR&Mitigation measures contracts Finalization of Vesting Subdivision Map 45 Day DEIR Public Review Period Yes Response to Public Comments FEIR/Mitigation Monitoring Program Public Hearings April Dec 2012 Planning Comm Hearing GPA,SP and DEIR and VTM Yes City Council Hearing of GPA,SP and DEIR and VTM Yes City prepares&Files Application to LAFCO LAFCO reviews Annexation&Public Hearing Yes 108 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE 08/10/10 Attachment 2: May 27,2008 Council Resolution to process GPA RESOLUTION NO 2008-048 am RESOLU'T'ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING STAFF TO.PROCESS A GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DIAGRAM AMENDMENT PLN 2008-1280/GPA 2008-0022/SP 2008-0002/ZCH 2008-0150 FOR THE EAGLE RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN (Eagle Ranch,LLC/RR.M Design Group) WHF,RF,AS, an application has been received from RRM Design Group, 3765 S. Higuera Street,Ste 102, San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 (Applicant)and Eagle.Ranch, LLC,P.O Box 25010,Ventura,CA 93002(Property Ow71er),to consider a project consisting of a General Plan Land Use Diagram Amendment for a Specific Plan and City Annexation project on a 3,450± acre project site located southwest of the City incorporated limits(APN: 045-302-011 051-391-003, 051.401.001, 051-011-004 051-391-002, 051-411.002, 051-411-003, 051421-001 051- 431-001 051441.001 051451-001 031461-002,051471-001 051.481-001 051-491-001 051-501-001 051-501-002, 051-501-003, 051-511-003, 051-511-002, 051-511-001 051-521-001, 051-521-004 051 531-003,051-541-001 051-541-002,051-541-003,051-551-003,051-551-004 051-551-001051-561-002, 051-571-001 051-581-001 051-591-003, 051-591-001 051.601-003, 051-601-002, 051-611-001 051- 611-002,051-621-001,051-631-005,051-631-002,051-641-002,051-641-001 051-641-003,051-651-001 051.661.001 051-671-001 051-681-001 051-691-012, 051-691-007 051.691-008, 051-691-015, 051- 691-009,051-691-014 051-691-013,051-701-001 051-701-002,056-271-001 059-012-018 059.121-002, 059-121-003, 059-121-004, 059-121-007 059-121-008, 059-131-015, 059-131-014 059-201-013, 059- 201-007 059-211-004 059-351-006,059-351-005,059-351-004 059.361-004 059-361-002,059-361-001 059-371-001 058-381-002,059-381-002,051-391-002,059.391-002,059-401-001);and, WHEREAS, the Atascadcro City Council considered authorizing staff to process the proposed application at a public meeting on May 27 2008 consistent with the City's General Plan Amendment Policy,and, WHEREAS,the project area is included in the City's Sphere of Influence;and, WHEREAS,the Atascadero General provides a policy direction for the processing of a specific plan and annexation for the project area;and, NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, hereby resolves to authorize staff to process the requested General Plan Land Use Diagram and Text Amendment for The Eagle Ranch General Plan Text.Amendment to allow a Specific Plan on the project site. The General Plan shall be processed concurrently with a Specific Plan. A series of Neighborhood and Community workshops along with one or more joint Planning Commission/ City Council study sessions will be required. Staff will return to the City Council with a detailed project description and a defined Specific Plan project area,subject to the following exhibits: r 109 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE 08/10/10 City of Atascadero Resolution No.2008-048 Page 2 of 5 EXHIBIT A. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DIAGRAM EXHIBIT B LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT C• EXISTING PROJECT SITE AERIAL On motion by Council Member O'Malley,and seconded by Council Member Clay the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES Council Members Beraud,Clay Luna,O'Malley and Mayor Brennler NOES None ABSTAIN- None ABSENT None ADOPTED May 27,2008 CIVOATCADERO,CA M' j Nermler tw ,� Mayor ATTEST ?/1 Marcia McClure Torgerson,C.M.C.,ly Clerk A.PPRO ED AZ., Brian Pieriyk,City Attorney '�Mlrlr"' 110 +v: v «� a ��yywy'r►1\� �'Ip�f �xi •���6f�Mw�' if.. Rrp4A��O�4°,.f*o�4`°sdddp +"r4 4 s"�+.far��i��'�mow'"" .•,� .: ,�"��rM�lliry.R>M+ts\4�6kK"r� 1 ;W+`a�'�' ihy4.lt•,,,, ,�O''�^�ayoV Piny`�:`uScper"d: irk vri�y ipa Y`�"iry�''rh $ 1►tll'+�'"e d% � ,,i�g`s a�.t t nab ��z r5 w."GINA a 4ls.,arasr9t le ►a�:yaA#"v�,r �� �.�UI *�{•,�a+�►*�i►�nsyl/�i�.'.r =hi air � ` � � "�,. u G 1f�� tit 1at" rra �' ti�/ tin 4'a�er, A4v. ♦ YdFya.011�� N�se� �• tp� 46.�t �� r � - 1 elf ', 'SYY ''� /PYLr.w�`}tR4+� .• �d 49i y "` `,�� t A� ! r s-y- �"�� � '� Y wi�'r1t1 � �r,$,yd?��''t.`,s�� �f fF �y �+"'`'/••'� �5io, !► !{�t� �ti+�1.,�' �:•\�4"�a•1�1 G.��.t,ice' g � ,,� � �t i • 71/i! ' ✓ I.t ��Mei t>��r M � r�rf T��B did f ','®m�►rtl` vis*,j ��•'} Y�� �Nay�,r►M} yr0l,�,�°,�+99tYaYr9'Fiia'. �A,Na � a./ r � t� v+fAr�py4�p�was,;,ttss0.�'a:�!rdilid�s' _ '►�A �,\r' �,,. i �\� l!E!q� �►F�by "' �aMs.$ �''i vt tir Ai+; ' '4 �`NR i' ..R ♦ �� 'AV 4.+� .A.N`tT* .rrd � ♦�V �o � ����i�ai*�►�*�j►�ti�"L�a����t�������•c''°k�O�°''�+�y_r_:�+%�',: t{i ���1+ ��%� iYll��}ate�a�����{���N��ili1�s+`J� r'r,�" +w����ros•+',��vt� � I� � �fi��iA�r4•r r 4G� �C�.'' 1t��i. ,M' �"'i'O �'`rn X11 \ 4s���3•r�*t�`'� t - --- �I tiA11k'!t�".,.a n.� r- arid►y�,ir��jt ' ���dy"«&�a "��4�� t°x lllr► _44e� "; `a� b i" l ��� G •.�' 'yam.q-ZAP"P"-10 y� so now S AS AMS!A WON wry. �} �• �� � 4S" ���4���� e , , � Ro !��� d e 9. }i-a"� Arm Pp lk elk,t t r ji 0 f ) J R v an ?� � b 3 r Sw.. ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE 08/10/10 Attachment 3: Eagle Ranch Specific Plan Area Map acv Hair �• O 3 «, r M �P IS O � O .1f � an Gabriel..../ w i Ta Marra Bay Oao 'o t r � A i cif ...• .. § �- ero P. Y 3 v 01 gs7 Psf `\ y �i, , ' to Santa Margar itn SSW n N � P �t� 234 A' Atascadero Sphere of influence %low Ta SLO 114 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE. 08/10/10 Attachment 4: Eagle Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Review Correspondence rrm group �� creating environments people enjoy July 12 2010 RRM Design Group 3765 S.Higuera St.,Ste.102 Warren Frace San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 Planning Director P-(805)543.1794 City of Atascadero P{805}543 4609 6907 El Camino Real Atascadero CA 93422 www,rrmdesign.com Re: Eagle Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Review Dear Warren Consistent with our recent discussions this letter is to request that the City Council authorize staff to proceed with preparation of a scope of work issuance of a request for proposals interviews, and selection and retention of an Environmental Impact Report preparation consultant for Eagle Ranch Specific Plan Why is the applicant requesting the retention of this consultant at this time?Eagle Ranch may be a unique opportunity for the City to accomplish many of Its goals as stated in the General Pian and envisioned in the City Economic Development Strategy As such, it deserves careful attention to planning and environmental issues Planning for Eagle Ranch warrants a proactive, effective, and efficient approach to identifying environmental issues We believe that the City the public, and the applicant will be better served by having independent environmental review conducted as early in the planning process as possible It will allow the project Specific Plan and Project Design to incorporate the observations technical information and recommendations of environmental professionals as part of the basic design and Specific Plan process rather than a series of mitigation measures applied to 'fix"the project late in the design and public review process.An example of an issue(one of many)where early independent environmental review/involvement will be critical is Native Oak Trees City retention of a certified arborist to assess the impacts and options for road routing, trail routing and development envelope configurations early in the process will allow the development of solutions that incorporate environmental stewardship into the Specific Plan standards and project layout 'by design not 'by mitigation Likewise the Oak Tree Standards developed for the Specific Plan (even at the Public draft stage)will reflect professional arboreal conservation and protection standards and approaches This approach to environmental review will result in a better designed project and it is more accurate, effective,and efficient The applicant understands that the City will contract with the environmental consultant,control the consultant's scope,work effort,work activities and contact with the applicant. Likewise, the applicant understands that the City environmental consultant will prepare a full and complete EIR for public review and comment.The applicant understands that this effort by the City environmental consultant will be accomplished at the applicant's expense consistent with City policies COMMUNITY I PUBLIC SAFETY I RECREATION I EDUCATION I URBAN ARCHITECTS I ENGINEERS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS 1440 A(99orr"Gorpn ation vktnr Ma.U.) my AmhiW1#r11,90 1 bry Mt::hael,HCR t3rtb9S,t S+l477f.I i<f'fHtkul,iA IY W 1 115 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE 08/10/10 *000 rrm group �� Eagle Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Review creating environments people enjoy July 12, 2010 Page 2of2 Thank you for your consideration of this request to begin independent environmental review of Eagle Ranch Specific Plan at this time. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact us at our office at(805) 543-1794 Sincerely RRM DESIGN GROUP Victor itgo AIA cc: G ft Eagle Ranch Smith Eagle Ranch J. Ferber, RRM Design Group T Walters RRM Design Group :rlrr:, tu,lh:�,r:r,SrIY.+2!)1fl!It)I(flrTt:agar.-R:tnt':r.4T,',l-r:rr:l.5f t!'r il�'.f.p1nrtu7e.nr eti' resWui::Ir:rrce`+;r"r�.r,..t;r ('iiy.ra:.Irr�ftrnrtarrro r»cufrnr+f•fi, l)dr, 116 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE 08/10/10 `rrM�f Attachment 5: Eagle Ranch Conceptual Project Description EAGLE RANCH VTM AND SPECIFIC PLAN rrm group Conceptual Project Description creating environments people enjoy" July 13, 2010 1 Recent Planning Activity Milestones See attached Milestones Timeline 1998 through 8/2010 2. Overall Approach and Vision -The applicants overall vision for the Eagle Ranch is driven by a desire to have the project: • Reflect and build upon the history and heritage of Eagle Ranch • Continue Eagle Ranch agricultural operations. • Be consistent and compatible with the character of the"Colony the existing community and the City concept of 'elbow room as expressed in the General Plan (Goal LOC.1). • Use a clustered settlement approach that causes less environmental impact but is more environmentally balanced and economically rewarding than implementation of the existing 4552 lots of record • Create a small Village Center to create a 'central gathering place for residents and visitors to Eagle Ranch • Keep large areas of Eagle Ranch in open space with limited public access to retain the conservation values and agriculture operations existing on the Ranch • Create a public park and trails system for access to the surrounding neighborhood and limited areas of the ranch consistent with the protection of open space and active agriculture operations • Be identified as a highly desirable, premier place to live In Atascadero the north county and the state based upon the Eagle Ranch planning and development approach. • Be economically feasible to Implement. • Contribute positively to the fiscal condition of the City • Complete the environmental review City and LAFCO entitlements process in an efficient manner and within a reasonable time frame. 3. Site Planning Approach-See attached Conceptual Land Use Plan The site planning approach is to identify areas where the residential entitlements of the existing lots of record can be clustered to reduce environmental Impacts and use the routing of existing ranch roads where feasible to serve the clustered lots and other uses. In order to create a neighborhood, the planning approach incorporates many elements of the City s General Plan such as affordable housing,a Village Center commercial area to serve residents' daily needs and provide a central sense of place and a public park/trails system radiating from the village area to residential clusters within the project and connecting to the existing surrounding neighborhood The plan will incorporate a Highway Commercial economic development area and an area identified for a future Resort Hotel/Dude Ranch to be consistent with the City Economic Development Vision 4. Constraints Currently Identified -See attached Maps • Biology-Preliminary biological analysis was performed by consultants for the applicant to identify broad categories and approximate locations of potential area of biological importance These included plants animals and fish. • Slopes-Topographical mapping of the site has been completed to identify slopes on the site.Slopes are a significant constraint to development on the site. • Flood-Base mapping for the site has incorporated FEMA mapping as a preliminary planning guideline however the FEMA maps are thought tobe somewhat antiquated and not reflective of specific site analysis. , Igoe 117 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE 08/10/10 vftw 21 Eagle Ranch VTM and Specific Plan rrmrou in Conceptual Project Description creating environments people enjoy July 13, 2010 • Archaeology- Preliminary archaeological field reconnaissance was conducted and likely locations of cultural resources were identified These preliminary identifications act as a guide in planning/design but may need further investigation to closely determine the nature, extent, and importance of the resources • Historical -Extensive effort has been expended in describing the history, remaining historical resources and significance of Eagle Ranch throughout recent history • Traffic-A preliminary review of the capacity of the Santa Barbara interchange was conducted to determine its remaining capacity Further analysis specific to the project will need to be conducted • Geology-A preliminary review identified geological features such as ancient landslide areas to be avoided by new development. 5. Land Uses Proposed -See attached Conceptual Overall Project Statistics for areas, percentages,and comparisons • Highway Commercial-Approximately 10 acres is proposed in a location convenient to US 101/Santa Barbara interchange. • Village Center-Approximately 5 acres is proposed for uses to serve the daily needs of Eagle Ranch residents This area will likely contain retail shops or offices, postal facilities, meeting spaces and other functions needed and used by residents daily The Village Center will reduce vehicle trips and provide a central gathering and focal "place for the Eagle Ranch neighborhood • Resort Hotel-Two feasibility studies have been completed by the applicant looking at the viability of this type of use. Both studies confirm the value of open space as an"attractor"for this use, and indicate potential future market support for a modest size but"upscale facility A critical prerequisite for a Resort Hotel is the need for Eagle Ranch to be well established as a high quality neighborhood place in advance of Resort Hotel development. A second prerequisite is for the City to have a vibrant, active tourism support infrastructure and track record of frequent successful community events before Resort Hotel operators will attempt to develop. * Single Family Residential -Preliminary site studies are based upon 452 SFD units reflecting the number of existing lots of record However, the final number of homes may vary depending upon the financial feasibility of the project once all agency requirements are determined and costs accounted for A variety of single family detached lot sizes are anticipated varying from approximately 8 000sf to over 1 acre. • Multi-Family Residential- Multi-Family dwellings are proposed in the area near the Village and Park. These units may be affordable dwellings and perhaps senior housing These units may be for sale and/or rental housing. • Parks-A neighborhood public park is proposed its size will reflect at least the City parklands standards&requirements The location considered is mostly flat land adjacent to a creek side setting and within walking distance of the Village. The park is envisioned to be focused primarily on passive activities (picnic, BBQ, etc.) some children s play structures, horseshoes volleyball, and limited open turf areas to accommodate group and family play • Open Space- Within the City portion of Eagle Ranch, significant open space areas are envisioned Likely measured in thousands of acres Much of the open space will continue to be utilized for agricultural activities.The intent is to provide limited public access through and/or adjacent to these areas via public trails for pedestrian, bicyclists, and equestrians. *4010, 118 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE. 08/10/10 Eagle Ranch VTM and Specific Plan rrm group ill Conceptual Project Description creating environments people enjoy' July 13, 2010 • Roads/Traiis - Roads are to the extent practicable aligned to coincide with existing ranch roads New roads will be necessary to reach some development areas Trail systems are likewise aligned to follow existing ranch roads where practicable Trails will be open to the public. To accommodate equestrian trail users a staging area will be developed to accommodate small trucks and trailers for visiting riders • Schools- Discussions with the District are ongoing regarding the necessity for a school site at Eagle Ranch 6. Onsite Circulation Proposed -See attached Conceptual Overall Project Statistics for lengths and attached Conceptual Road and Trail Cross Sections for design • Roads -A variety of road widths are proposed in order to facilitate the terrain being traversed by the roads Road widths are in general kept as narrow as practicable in order to be in keeping with the vision for the project and to avoid impacts to trees and other resources • Trails - Public pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian trails are proposed and conceptually designed to lead to the Village Center and to connect with the surrounding neighborhood. 7 Public Services/utilities Approach- • Water-The project will be served by Atascadero Mutual Water Company(AMWC) The existing lots of record are 'Colony" lots and therefore are shareholders and must be served by AMWC. AMWC has prepared a water supply analysis to review their ability to serve and concluded that capacity for Eagle Ranch is available An application is pending with AMWC to annex a portion of the Eagle Ranch site that Ono is inside the City SOI but not currently within the Colony boundary The annexation area is the site of the Eagle Ranch Headquarters and site of the proposed Resort Hotel/Dude Ranch. • Sewer-Service will be provided by the City • Law Enforcement-Service will be provided by the City • Fire/Life Safety- Service will be provided by the City S. Affordable Housing -Affordable Housing Is proposed within the Eagle Ranch to comply with City requirements Approximately 90 units are anticipated to be developed mostly as attached dwellings near the Village Center 9, Phased Approach -Eagle Ranch will be a phased project guided by the Specific Plan and the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map. At this time the phase locations and sequence are unknown. 10. Entitlements Process & Environmental Review - • City-City approvals required are General Plan Amendment/Pre-zoning Specific Plan and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map • City-Certification of an Environmental Impact Report. • LAFCO-The City will be the applicant to annex the Eagle Ranch project area into the City corporate limits this will require approval by LAFCO 11 "Green" Features & Objectives of the Conceptual Plan- • Village Center- reduces vehicle trips and vehicle miles travelled by providing a place for residents' daily need's and needs of visitors onsite and accessible via bike, walking and horseback • Highway Commercial - Provides a potential place to accommodate overnight visitors to the Eagle Ranch neighborhood provide places for Eagle Ranch residents 119 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE. 08/10/10 Eagle Ranch VTM and Specific Plan rrm group Conceptual Project Description treating environments people enjoy' July 13, 2010 to obtain meals,goods and services on a scale somewhat larger than the commercial facilities in the Village Center For the City, highway commercial is one critical leg of the three legged stool of environment, economy and social justice that is part of balanced development. For the residents highway commercial contributes to reduction of vehicle trips and miles travelled as it is accessible via bike, pedestrian and equestrian trails • Road Design Approach-Roads within Eagle Ranch are designed to be as narrow as practicable to accommodate passenger and emergency vehicles. Improvements within the roadway are minimized to maintain a rural appearance and at the same time limit disturbance, minimize structural improvements (paved drainage swales etc.) minimize grading that disturbs the environment, retain native oak trees and allow maximum maintenance of natural functions to accommodate drainage, etc. • Oak Tree Retention, Removal and Disturbance Standards Maintain native oak trees to the greatest extent practicable and consistent with the City regulations Use early involvement of City retained environmental professionals and a professional arborist in the Eagle Ranch site plan development, in the field review of the site planning as it is developed, and finally in the creation of Specific Plan standards • Retain Open Space&Conservation Values-Observe City creek setback requirements and creek policies. Avoid disturbance of identified critical creek habitat areas such as steelhead fishery habitat and other critical areas. In large contiguous areas where settlement is not anticipated retain open space, continue agriculture operations and retain conservation values and features Allow controlled public access via a well defined system of trails to accommodate pedestrians, bicyclists and equestrians. Where needed limit public access in favor of retaining conservation and environmental values Attachments Milestones Timeline Conceptual Land Use Plan Maps Aerial Base with Topo and Conceptual Constraints Map Conceptual Overall Project Statistics Conceptual Road and Trail Cross Sections 120 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE 08/10/10 ' Attachment 6: Eagle Ranch Conceptual Project Statistics EAGLE RANCH CONCEPTUAL OVERALL PROJECT STATISTICS 16-JUI-13 Note..Statistics are for entire Project Area-3,460 ac Item Acreage %of project SUMMARY Developed Areas 585 'x° 16.9% Open Space Areas 2 8 f 5 ?; 8:3.1°x•° Total Land Use 3,460,11 100.0% Item lAcreage l:rrts '5P Retail of Project Cammercial Areas 13 village Commercial 4 .tin iii ItwarCorr�mer0 ciar 13 8 .4% Resort Hotel 54.3'5�4 3 Total Commercial 73.5 2.1°11°. Item d create %af Project Open Space Areas Sig Val €fi4 3 � s.4% 3 _ Park 13 6i 0 % 4' � ' andscape Buffer 155. 6pen Space Rerriainder ',775 611 .80.2% Total Open Space 2,875.0 83.1% Item 'Acreage ;tots" inits Density dulac p j°roafProject Residential Developnient.Areas Single Family 4661 452 8,00#1sf to la 13.5"r'a lw9uli-Eami3y .-,�»,�,.,»,�..�» 9C# .»»»»».w,....�..»�» 9»4:'..�,�,»„��,.-.,.�,»u 0.3°% Total Residential 476,8 542 13.8% Item Paved Miles lPaved ac. 90 cf FToject Roads Main Loop _ 32 24 337 98 d� 0.3% internal „ro , ry0 97 15 3 �0.6°f° secondary gess 1' 10 0.75" 0.9 0.09Y0 ».,. 6 Li.31n Lt-61'-0-0r° Total Roads 12.40 30.:6 0.9% Item 'width Pa+t*d .files ;Acreage cxF Prajoct Traits Class I I,11�ilty-L se 12 S ' 63 2.5 0.1% Equestrian(Existing Road) 5 26�'� � , oUestriart 6 Staging area Total Trails 9.711 4.0 0A% 121 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE 08/10/10 *4W Attachment 7 Eagle Ranch Milestones Timeline Eagle Ranch Milestones Timeline July 12, 2010 Dates Activity 12/98 Owner files notice of Williamson Act non-renewal 2000 Owner encourages City to Amend City of Atascadero SOI 2000-2002 County approves 452 Certificates of Compliance for existing lots w/in SO[, 33 2002 City approves SOI amendment 06/03 City LAFCO Owner enter into MOU 20OS2006 Consultants conducts preliminary env special studies No, traffic, goe, cultural, historic) 12/05 1 st Resort Hotel Feasibility Report by ERA 01/07 10/08 Owner conducts site analysis & concept design 02/07 Owner enter into exclsive agreement to negotiate Conservation Easement with Land Conservancy of SLO 06/07 Owner conducts neighborhood outreach meeting #1 06/07 Owner establishes Eagle Ranch web site 12107 Owner meets with Atascadero Unified School District 01/08 Owners meets with staff to review access, roads, City service capacity 02/08 City accepts application for Specific Plan and GPA 03/08 City staff County staff, Owner joint meeting 05/08 City Council Authorization to Proceed with Specific Plan 06/08 2nd Resort Hotel Feasibility report to Owners by ERA 06/2008.07/2008 Owner applies to annex Resort Hotel site area to Atascadero Mutual water Company 07/08 Owner meets with City staff to review- Resort Hotel Feasibility Report, Affordable Housing, Parks Trails, City conducts SWOT analysis 07/08 Owner meets with Cal Trans to review condition & status of Santa Barbara Interchange 09/08 Joint CC/PC meeting to review approach and direction 10/08 Meeting with staff to review Parks/Traits 10/08 Meeting with Supervisor Patterson update on progress 10/08-04/10 Owner continues conceptual site analysis and design 01/09 Willamson Act Contract expires 06/09 Meeting with AUSD 09/09 Owner conducts neighborhood outreach meeting #2 12/09 ATMWC completes water supply analysis for Eagle Ranch and annexation of Resort 04/10 Owner restarts project, establish regular meetings w/staff 04/10 Owner requests EIR consultant selection process to begin 05/10 On site meeting to review conceptual road alignments w/City staff 06/10 Meeting with staff to review Parks/Trails 07/10 Owners submit Council Update materials (site concept, timeline road, trails, etc,) 08/10 City Council Eagle Ranch Update meeting *4W 122 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE 08/10/10 Attachment 8: Eagle Ranch Existing lots t "` Tn w_a 0 V Y� k "p" .� 3aff *�' he ��-64 a .1 `—-- v � k .J Ili, ' ".rr...'w�wirer Y,w�..� �►F+ryryi �T, W 123 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE 08/10/10 Attachment 9: Eagle Ranch Conceptual Land Use Plan MEMW w KU r 6u ui 41Q. 41 05 Z fl .' fUi� �' J'k Tie '� F 4 e a) U . �� 0 ' ft 0 U1 CL OL ri 14W 124 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE 08/10/10 Attachment 10: Eagle Ranch Conceptual Constraints Plan IL *-00100 q 31 . 0 6 w"Y'201 iv Immmm z A4 gi a Z5 fi Ism ,aV QQI 'C CO fj ai U- rc U U W 2 tt U 125 ITEM NUMBER. C -1 DATE 08/10/10 *mw Attachment 11 Eagle Ranch Suitable Development Areas & Uses, Roads, Trails &Access rnrr { a; s `�" p'pa ♦R'Y Mme;' %k c •'}��� f��Y�II �}� J �+.a. it a`q '� .:.,�, .�..0 > �... ,:?a.�...'�'" 126 ..r' ..r+ ITEM NUMBER. C -2 DATE 08/10/10 'm ■im A p 1918 1 9 Atascadero City Council Staff Report— Community Development Department Historic City Hall Repair Historic Cedar Trees - Issues and Options RECOMMENDATION Council direct staff to revise and recirculate the City Hall Repair Project Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) (PPN 2004-0141) to allow for the removal of the two Deodar Cedar trees A3 and A4 on the East Mall frontage and one Italian Cypress tree A7 on the West Mall frontage DISCUSSION Background. There are seven large and mature trees located in the lawn areas surrounding City Hall Six of the trees are Deodar Cedars and the seventh tree is an Italian Cypress tree Based on historic photographic evidence and the size of the trees, staff has concluded that all of these trees were planted within the first ten years of the completion of City Hall The arborist estimates that these trees are about 90 years old Deodar Cedars typically have a life span around 130 years The 2006 Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the City Hall repair project stated that all of these trees would be preserved during the repair project. As part of the City Hall deconstruction permit process, staff requested the City Arborist, Davey Resource Group (Davey), prepare a tree protection plan (TPP) for City Hall that would preserve the seven trees consistent with the MND Davey prepared the TPP in close consultation with City staff and Bernards Construction The trees have been identified as trees Al through A7 A description and map of each tree is provided on the following pages 128 ITEM NUMBER. C -2 DATE 08/10/10 Administration Building Renovation Site. Significant Trees (y Al —Deodar cedar (Cedrtrs deodara) Location: South side approximately feet front theedge of the building to trunk) DBH (Diameter at Breast Height) 48 inclies Carroll-,-Radius (measured froin trunk): 24 feet Tree Characteristics tree has co-doininarnt structure. two Previous lunb failures and air unhealed scar at the priniaty branch ninon. Some paining has been performed to acliie-e side-xallc and street clearance, 2.—Deodar cedar (Cedars deodara) Location: South side canopy touches building DBH: Ss inches (combined) Cauopv Radius 2 feet Tree Characteristics stics tree has co- dominant structure and siznlfrcant .-- deachi-ood, 5oi»e pruning has been performed to achieve sidewalk.and stn°eet clearance A3—Deodar cedarC edr us deodara) Location: East side. approximately 31 feet from edge of buildiiia(to trunk-) DBH: 4S inches Canopy Radius 27 Tree Characteristics Tree has significant learn toxN ards street and overall poor sti-tncttu�e �� �� mss. A4—Deodar cedar(Cedars deodara) Location: East side. canopy touches building DBH *;4 inches C'anopv Radius 28 feet Tree Characteristics Tree has co-donnnant..poor stricture, and evidence of inzultiple previous hilib failures. Overall canopy is combined Z-ith that of A3 EMMOOMM -40 129 ITEM NUMBER. C -2 DATE 08/10/10 l —Deodar cedar (Cedrus deadara) ..:, Location: Northside approximately 35 feet err from front steps. and 45 feet from building. , DBH 49 inches Cauopt•Radius 25 feet Tree Characteristics Tree has overall =ood structure with soiree cturent clearance pruning o-,er street. Note: old handicap access ramp should be removed for ecluilyiuent access. 1' A6—Deodar cedar(Cedrus deodara) Location: North side. approximately 41 feet from fi•ont steps, and 1 feet , from building DBH: ;3 inches Cauopv Radices 32 feet Tree Characteristics Tree leans and has poor structure Asphalt driN eway under canopy A7—Italian cypress (Cupressus seinperilrens) Location: SoutInvest side. approxniiately 21 feet from building DBH: 42 inches Canopy Radices N:A Tree Characteristics Tree developed nuilti-trunk forin because of previous sheer'.prtuiing. Only Italian cypress oil site.but is approximately the same aage as the other site trees. 130 ITEM NUMBER. C -2 DATE 08/10/10 Appendix D - Tree Protection Action Key DBH TPZ Recommended Preservation Measures Approx ideal Tree 4) (Diameter Common canopy Protection at 4.5 feet Name Radius Zone U! P a 6 Comments Additional Notes I �5 above (FT) Radius in 8 lu 0=- grade) Feet it - �2 I `5 it$ (� I li ei .2 a. (15x DBI - Hy- to W U, 0 V6 to 2 g] cc Co-dominant DEODARstructure broken Al 48 CEDAR 24 72 1 1 x x X1 x X1 X X X limbs Codominant structure large DEODAR deadwood,canopy A2 88 CEDAR 32 87 x X X X X I X X Mufti-Stern touches building Poor structure, DEODAR X X1 X X X significant lean X X A3 48 CEDAR 27 72 x towards street Co-dominant structure,poor *AWO structure,broken DEODAR limbs.canopy A4 f4 CEDAR 28 811 x x X1 x x x x x combined with A3 DEODAR A5 49 CEDAR 25 74 x x x x I X1 x I X� x Good structure DEODAR A6 53 CEDAR 32 80 x x x x X1 X1 X1 x I I Poor structure,lean ITALIAN Multi-stem due to A7 42 CYPRESS 7 63 x x X� Xi X1 x I shearing *M01 131 ITEM NUMBER. C-2 nATC naioi nioi n Site Map Showing Significant Trees ............ ............... Fenced, tree protection zones under trees LEWISAVENUE ............... ............ "==- ....... 24 ...... ........ ................................ w. . ......... CITY HALL Work area around trees A3 and A4 is very limited. ............ .......... ................... Nill 0 0 in s iM a Mumma 0;a 0 a -------- RA&M.AAVENUE Root protection area to allow matting X, works access around trees. 0 SUNKEN GARDEN 132 ITEM NUMBER. C -2 DATE 08/10/10 Analysis. `OO Some of the Trees are Obstructing Construction Based on Bernards review of the TPP, it has been determined that trees A3 and A4 (East Mall) will be very difficult to work around Both of these trees are very close to the building The work plan calls for excavation of the perimeter of the building foundation and free standing scaffoldings on the exterior This would require approximately a 20 foot clear area around the building In order to accomplish this, significant pruning of trees A3 and A4 would be required and much of the root protection zone would be disturbed As a result, there is a high probability that these two trees would not survive the construction process despite the City's best efforts at protection In addition to trees A3 and A4, Bernards has general concerns about the working around any trees on the site including • Stability and maintenance of root protection drive path matting • Constraints on perimeter foundation excavations and stockpiles • Safety of crews and equipment working on root protection matting areas • Increased costs of avoiding, pruning and working around trees The Trees are Historic Features of City Hall In order to accommodate the repair work, staff has reviewed the possibility of removing certain trees around City Hall Neither the Deodar Cedar or the Italian Cypress are native trees that are protected by the City's Tree Protection Ordinance However, the trees are part of the historic setting of the Atascadero City Hall and therefore covered under the National Register of Historic Places designation 133 ITEM NUMBER. C -2 DATE 08/10/10 Based on historic photographic evidence and the size of the trees, staff has concluded that all of these trees were planted well within the first ten years of the completion of City Hall ,„ r c This picture from the : r 1 � early to mid 1920's clearly shows the Deodar Cedars had - �... _,,,,. .•._.... .W - been growing for a few years. k. �..:.,.., '•' iii I {{7 tar When the trees were planted is important in determining if they were part of the building's period of historic significance Since these trees were planted during the time E G Lewis used the building as the Atascadero Colony Administration Building, these trees are part of the building's period of historic significance that is covered by the National Register designation The second part of historic significance is whether the trees are a character-defining features of the historic site In this case, staff has concluded that the two Deodar Cedars on the Palma frontage across from the Sunken Gardens and the two Deodar Cedars on Lewis Avenue across from the Junior High are significant character-defining features that frame the building and define the character of the site However, the two Deodar Cedars on East Mall (tree A3 and A4) and the Italian Cypress on West Mall (tree A7) have limited off-site visibility and tend to block view of City Hall rather than enhance views of City Hall Staff believes these trees have limited value as character- defining features of the site 134 ITEM NUMBER. C -2 DATE 08/10/10 Council Options Staff has identified three main options for the Council to consider The pros and cons of each option are discussed in the following sections • Option 1 — Remove trees A3, A4, and A7 (recommended action) • Option 2 — Preserve all trees (alternative action) • Option 3 — Remove all of the trees (alternative action) Option 1 - Remove Tree A3, A4 and A7 Option 1 involves the removal of the two deodar cedar trees on East Mall (A3 and A4) and the Italian Cypress on West Mall (A7) The four deodar cedar trees on Palma and Lewis Avenue would be protected during construction Trees A3 and A4 have structure and health issues The two trees have grown together and against the building compromising the structures of these trees In addition, the canopy of tree A3 is beginning to thin, indicating that this tree is in decline The Italian Cypress, (tree A7) is also in poor condition, and likely at the end of its life span Based on the following factors • Limited character-defining importance • Obstruction of construction work • High likelihood of damage from construction • Poor condition Staff thinks that the proper findings could be made to support an amendment of the MND to allow trees A3, A4 and A7 to be removed with mitigation measures Pros. • A balanced approach to historic preservation, cost and safety • CEQA findings and mitigation measures can be identified • The majority of construction impacts are eliminated • Trees A3, A4, and A7 are in poor condition and not visually significant. Cons • CEQA must be revised • Tree protection measures will be required for trees Al, A2, A5 and A6 Option 2 — Preserve all trees (alternative action) Option 2 involves preserving all seven trees around City Hall This is the option that is currently described in the adopted MND for the project. The City arborist has prepared a TPP to protect all seven trees However, both the arborist and Bernards think that the two Deodar Cedars on West Mall (A3 and A4) will be heavily impacted by construction activity including root damage and canopy pruning 135 ITEM NUMBER. C-2 DATE. 08/10/10 The arborist is concerned that these trees will likely be damaged during construction and may not survive long term In addition, protecting these trees will increase impact on the Palma and Lewis Avenue Deodar Cedars by redirecting construction work and activity Pros • Consistent with CEQA, no additional environmental work required Cons • Significantly complicates construction process • Will add the most costs to construction • Trees A3 and A4 will be heavily pruned and damaged by construction Option 3 — Remove all Trees (alternative action) Option 3 involves the removal of all seven trees from the site This option would simplify the construction process and eliminate the need for tree protection measures This option would also require a careful revision of the CEQA document to address the historic setting issue Removing all of trees will significantly change how the building looks, especially from the Sunken Gardens and has the most potential to create controversy Pros. • Eliminates all tree protection requirements • Eliminates the need for construction crews to work around trees Cons • Will significantly change the appearance of City Hall, especially from the Sunken Gardens • Will require significant revision to the CEQA document to address potential historic impacts • Will take the longest time to complete • Cost of removing and replacing all of the trees is not insignificant. FISCAL IMPACT Staff has not estimated the fiscal impact of each of the options due to the unknown construction costs related to tree avoidance ALTERNATIVES 1 The Council may direct staff to protect all of the trees during construction 2 The Council may direct staff to amend the MND to remove additional trees or all of the trees 136 ITEM NUMBER. C -2 DATE 08/10/10 The removal of any of the four remaining Deodar Cedars may have the potential to create a potentially significant historic impact that would require additional analysis in the MND Staff would recommend that a historic professional be retained to make a professional determination about the historic significance of the additional trees 3 The Council may refer this item back to staff for additional analysis 108001 137