Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet 091410
i9ia R 19-Mi CITY OF A TA SCA DERO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Tuesday, September 14, 2010 City Hall Council Chambers 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, California Community Redevelopment Agency r Closed Session 5 00 P M City Council Closed Session 5 00 P M (follows RDA Closed Session) Community Redevelopment Agency Special Meeting 6 00 P M City Council Regular Session Immediately following the conclusion of the Community Redevelopment Agency meeting 1 CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION Immediately following conclusion of Community Redevelopment Agency Closed Session 1 CLOSED SESSION -- PUBLIC COMMENT 2. COUNCIL LEAVES CHAMBERS TO BEGIN CLOSED SESSION 3 CLOSED SESSION --CALL TO ORDER a. Conference with Legal Counsel — Anticipated Litigation (Govt. Code Sec. 54956 9 (c)) Initiation of Litigation - One Potential Case 4. CLOSED SESSION --ADJOURNMENT 5 COUNCIL RETURNS TO CHAMBERS 6 CLOSED SESSION -- REPORT REGULAR SESSION — CALL TO ORDER. Immediately following the conclusion of the Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council Member Beraud ROLL CALL. Mayor Fonzi Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley Council Member Beraud Council Member Clay Council Member Kelley APPROVAL OF AGENDA. Roll Call PRESENTATION 1 Update on Savor the Central Coast Event 1110) 2 A. CONSENT CALENDAR. (All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the item before action is taken DRAFT MINUTES Council meeting draft minutes are listed on the Consent Calendar for approval of the minutes Should anyone wish to request an amendment to draft minutes, the item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and their suggestion will be considered by the City Council If anyone desires to express their opinion concerning issues included in draft minutes, they should share their opinion during the Community Forum portion of the meeting ) 1 City Council Meeting Draft Action Minutes —August 10, 2010 ■ Recommendation. Council approve the City Council Meeting Draft action Minutes of August 10, 2010 [City Clerk] 2. Conflict of Interest Code - Biennial Review ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Recommendation. Council adopt the Draft Resolution, updating and amending the Conflict of Interest Code for the City of Atascadero [City Clerk] 3. July 2010 Accounts Payable and Payroll ■ Fiscal Impact: $3,015,611 09 ■ Recommendation. Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for July 2010 [Administrative Services] 4. CSAC - EIA Delegation of Authority ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Recommendation. Council adopt the Draft Resolution delegating authority for CSAC-Excess Insurance Authority governance to the Director of Administrative Services to act on behalf of the City Council (except as to actions that must be approved by the City Council) [Administrative Services] 5. Title 8 Building Code Text Amendments - Title 9 Planning and Zoning Text Amendments - PLN 2010-1364 / ZCH 2010-0159 (City of Atascadero) ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Recommendation. Council introduce for second reading by title only the Draft Ordinance, to approve PLN 2010-1364 (Zone Text Change ZCH 2010-0159) [Community Development] 3 6 Temporary Road Closure — Colony Days Parade Route ■ Fiscal Impact: No net fiscal impact to the General Fund, as the road closure fee covers the staff time and equipment required for traffic control and clean-up related to this event (estimated at $2,600 00) ■ Recommendation. Council adopt the Draft Resolution establishing a temporary Colony Days Parade Route on Saturday, October 16, 2010, and establishing associated tow-away and "No Parking" zones and road closures from October 14 — 17, 2010, at the dates, times and locations as specified in the Draft Resolution [Community Services] 7 Contract for Animal Care and Control Services - FY 2010 - 2013 ■ Fiscal Impact: $239,23300 for the first year, with annual CPI adjustments thereafter ■ Recommendation. Council authorize the Mayor to execute a three-year contract with the County of San Luis Obispo for the continued provision of Animal Control Services from July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2013, in the amount of $239,233 00 for the first year, with annual CPI adjustments thereafter [Police] 8. Transit Bus Purchase ■ Fiscal Impact: The purchase price for the 30-passenger transit bus is $101,17091 ■ Recommendation. Council authorize Staff to proceed with the purchase of a 30-passenger transit bus through the CaIACT/MBTA Purchasing Cooperative from Creative Bus Sales for $101,170 91 [Public Works] 9 Urban Greening Grant Application Approval ■ Fiscal Impact: The adoption of this Resolution will allow future authorizations and/or funding reimbursements to be received by the City on the Charles Paddock Zoo Parking Lot Project. ■ Recommendation. Council adopt the Draft Resolution approving the application for grant funds for the Urban Greening Grant Program under the Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006 (PROPOSITION 84 ) [Public Works] UPDATES FROM THE CITY MANAGER. (The City Manager will give an oral report on any current issues of concern to the City Council ) COMMUNITY FORUM (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to address the Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has jurisdiction Speakers are limited to three minutes Please state your name for the record before making your presentation The Council may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless changed by the Council ) 4 B. PUBLIC HEARINGS None C MANAGEMENT REPORTS 1 Final Draft of Baseline Greenhouse Gas Inventory -- Community-Wide and Government Operations 2005 ■ Fiscal Impact: No current fiscal impact; report completed by grant through APCD ■ Recommendation. Council review and accept baseline greenhouse gas inventory report. [Community Development] 2. Establishment of Speed Limits on Various City Streets ■ Fiscal Impact: The estimated cost of installing a new speed limit sign and post is $250-$350, and to replace an existing speed limit sign is $100 The fiscal impact of this action is approximately $8,000 for materials and labor to be paid out of currently budgeted Street Maintenance funds ■ Recommendation. Council 1 Approve the 2010 Speed Zone Survey Update, dated July 2010, by TPG Consulting Group, Inc , and, 2 Adopt the attached Draft Resolution which formally establishes and/or modifies speed limits on various City streets [Police] COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS (On their own initiative, Council Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda The Council may take action on items listed on the Agenda ) 1 Council Member Ellen Beraud a Tobacco Retail Licensing Ordinance. Council Member Beraud seeks Council consensus to place a Tobacco Retail Licensing Ordinance on a future Council agenda for Council consideration D COMMITTEE REPORTS (The following represent standing committees Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary) Mayor Fonzi 1 Air Pollution Control District 2 County Mayors Round Table 3 Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC) 5 Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley 1 League of California Cities — Council Liaison and CITIPAC Board Member 2 SLO Council of Governments, President (SLOCOG) 3 SLO Regional Transit Authority, President (SLORTA) Council Member Beraud 1 City / Schools Committee 2 Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA) Council Member Clay 1 City / Schools Committee Council Member Kelley 1 Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Committee 2 Atascadero Youth Task Force 3 Homeless Services Oversight Council E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND / OR ACTION 1 City Council 2 City Clerk 3 City Treasurer 4 City Attorney 5 City Manager F ADJOURNMENT Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. Correspondence submitted at this public hearing will be distributed to the Council and available for review in the City Clerk's office I Victoria Randall, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing agenda for the September 14 2010 Regular Session of the Atascadero City Council was posted on September 7 2010 at the Atascadero City Hall 6907 EI Camino Real Atascadero CA 93422 and was available for public review in the Customer Service Center at that location Signed this 7th day of September 2010 at Atascadero, California. Victoria Randall, Deputy City Clerk City of Atascadero 6 City of Atascadero WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 6.00 p m unless there is a Community Redevelopment Agency meeting commencing at 6 00 p m. in which event the Council meeting will commence immediately following the conclusion of the Community Redevelopment Agency meeting Council meetings will be held at the City Hall Council Chambers, 6907 EI Camino Real Atascadero Matters are considered by the Council in the order of the printed Agenda. Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public inspection during City Hall business hours at the Front Counter of City Hall, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero and on our website, www.atascadero.org An agenda packet is also available for public review at the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road. Contracts, Resolutions and Ordinances will be allocated a number once they are approved by the City Council. The minutes of this meeting will reflect these numbers All documents submitted by the public during Council meetings that are either read into the record or referred to in their statement will be noted in the minutes and available for review in the City Clerk's office Council meetings are videotaped and audio recorded, and may be reviewed by the public. Copies of meeting recordings are available for a fee. Contact the City Clerk for more information (470-3400) In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City please contact the City Manager's Office or the City Clerk's Office, both at (805) 470-3400 Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA Under Agenda item, "COMMUNITY FORUM" the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having business with the Council to approach the lectern and be recognized. 1 Give your name for the record (not required) 2. State the nature of your business. 3 All comments are limited to 3 minutes. 4 All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council. 5 No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any other individual, absent or present This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum (unless changed by the Council) TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS(from Title 2, Chapter 1 of the Atascadero Municipal Code) Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will give their report, and the Council will ask questions of staff The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being considered to step up to the lectern If you wish to speak for against or comment in any way- 1 ay1 You must approach the lectern and be recognized by the Mayor 2. Give your name (not required) 3 Make your statement 4 All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council 5 No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any other individual, absent or present 6 All comments limited to 3 minutes If you wish to use a computer presentation to support your comments, you must notify the City Clerk's office at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Digital presentations must be brought to the meeting on a USB drive or CD You are required to submit to the City Clerk a printed copy of your presentation for the record. Please check in with the City Clerk before the meeting begins to announce your presence and turn in the printed copy The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter no further public comments will be heard by the Council. 7 ITEM NUMBER. A -1 DATE. 09/14/10 ruf7�•; JPS NOW n �'9'�' r r' 11970 CITY OF A TASCADERO CITY COUNCIL DRAFT ACTION MINUTES Tuesday, August 10, 2010 600PM City Hall Council Chambers 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, California CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION — CALL TO ORDER 6 00 P M *4w Mayor Fonzi called the meeting to order at 6 02 p m and Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley led the Pledge of Allegiance ROLL CALL. Present: Council Members Clay, O'Malley, Kelley, Beraud and Mayor Fonzi Absent. None Others Present: City Clerk /Assistant to City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard, Community Development Director Warren Frace, Public Works Director Russ Thompson, Community Services Director Brady Cherry, Police Chief Jim Mulhall, Fire Chief Kurt Stone, and Deputy City Attorney Don Davis APPROVAL OF AGENDA. Roll Call MOTION By Council Member Clay and seconded by Council Member Beraud to approve the agenda Motion passed 5.0 by a roll-call vote. CC Draft Action Minutes of 8/10/10 Page 1 of 6 9 ITEM NUMBER. A - 1 DATE. 09/14/10 PRESENTATIONS 1 Presentations to outgoing members of Parks & Recreation Commission Matthew O'Connell, Youth Representative Dan Chacon, Commissioner Mayor Fonzi and the City Council thanked Matthew and Dan for their service to Atascadero and presented each of them with a plaque Matthew and Dan thanked the Council for the opportunity to serve A. CONSENT CALENDAR. 1 City Council Meeting Draft Minutes — July 27, 2010 ■ Recommendation. Council approve the Draft Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010 [City Clerk] Council Member Kelley stated that he read an email from Anita Robinson during the Ex Parte of Item #C-1, and would like that fact added to the minutes MOTION By Council Member Beraud and seconded by Council Member Kelley to approve the Draft Meeting Minutes of July 27, 2010, as amended Motion passed 5.0 by a roll-call vote. 2. June 2010 Accounts Payable and Payroll ■ Fiscal Impact: $1,737,217 74 ■ Recommendation. Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for June 2010 [Administrative Services] MOTION By Council Member Beraud and seconded by Council Member Kelley to approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for June 2010 Motion passed 5.0 by a roll-call vote. UPDATES FROM THE CITY MANAGER. City Manager Wade McKinney gave an update on projects and issues within the City 1400 CC Draft Action Minutes of 8/10/10 Page 2 of 6 10 ITEM NUMBER. A-1 DATE. 09/14/10 COMMUNITY FORUM The following citizens spoke during Community Forum Ted Mort, Jim Patterson, David Broadwater, Joanne Main, Steve Martin, Karyn Sturtevant, and Maggie Cox. Mayor Fonzi closed the COMMUNITY FORUM period. B PUBLIC HEARINGS 1 Title 8 Building Code Text Amendments - Title 9 Planning and Zoning Text Amendments - PLN 2010-1364 / ZCH 2010-0159 (City of Atascadero) ■ Ex Parte Communications ■ Fiscal Impact: There are no fiscal impacts associated with the proposed code text updates ■ Recommendation. Planning Commission Recommends Council Introduce Draft Ordinance A for first reading, by title only, to approve PLN 2010-1364 (Zone Text Change ZCH 2010-0159) [Community Development] Community Development Director Warren Frace gave the staff report and answered questions from the Council PUBLIC COMMENT The following citizens spoke on this item Dan Chacon, Joanne Main, and Diane Mandella Mayor Fonzi closed the Public Comment period. MOTION By Council Member Kelley and seconded by Mayor Fonzi to introduce Draft Ordinance A for first reading, by title only, to approve PLN 2010-1364 (Zone Text Change ZCH 2010-0159), with the following amendments added to 9-3 701 1 Change "certified/licensed by the S to "certified/licensed by a State recognized organization " 2 Substitute Adult Oriented Business for Sexually Oriented Buss ,ess Motion passed 4 1 by a roll-call vote. (Beraud opposed) CC Draft Action Minutes of 8/10/10 Page 3 of 6 11 ITEM NUMBER. A - 1 DATE 09/14/10 2 Confirming the Cost of Vegetative Growth and/or Refuse Abatement ■ Ex Parte Communications 1" 100 ■ Fiscal Impact: The City will receive $124,950 00 from the 2010/2011 property tax rolls in weed abatement / refuse abatement assessments ■ Recommendation. Council adopt the Draft Resolution, confirming the cost of vegetative growth (weeds) and/or refuse (rubbish) abatement. [Fire] Fire Chief Kurt Stone gave the staff report and answered questions from the Council PUBLIC COMMENT None MOTION By Council Member Kelley and seconded by Council Member Beraud to adopt the Draft Resolution, confirming the cost of vegetative growth (weeds) and/or refuse (rubbish) abatement. Motion passed 5.0 by a roll-call vote. (Resolution No 2010- 062) Mayor Fonzi recessed the meeting at 8.12 p.m Mayor Fonzi reconvened the meeting at 8.25 p.m C MANAGEMENT REPORTS 1 Eagle Ranch Specific Plan — Council Direction on Processing of Specific Plan, Environmental Impact Report, and Public Review Process — PLN 2008-1280 / GPA 2008-0022 / SP 2008-0002 / ZCH 2008- 0150 (Eagle Ranch, LLC / RRM Design Group) ■ Fiscal Impact: The fiscal impact of the Specific Plan and EIR process on the City is expected to be minimal The City's cost recovery fees require that planning staff time is covered for the preparation of the Specific Plan and EIR The project EIR will analyze the fiscal impacts of the project on the City of Atascadero Current City policies require residential portions of a project to be revenue neutral to the City The tourist services and resort components of the project are expected to be revenue positive to the City ■ Recommendations. Council 1 Endorse the Eagle Ranch public participation and project processing outline (Attachment 1), and, 2 Direct staff to issue requests for proposals (RFPs) for an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Eagle Ranch Specific Plan Project. [Community Development] `.d# CC Draft Action Minutes of 8/10/10 Page 4 of 6 12 ITEM NUMBER. A - 1 DATE 09/14/10 Community Development Director Warren Frace gave the staff report and answered questions from the Council Also, the Applicant Victor Montgomery of RRM Design Group, made a presentation for the Council on behalf of the Smith family PUBLIC COMMENT The following citizens spoke on this item Diane Mandella, Jim Wilkins, Marty Brown, Tina Salter, Doug Chisolm (spoke twice), Twila Martin, David Broadwater, Bridget Noel, Jim Patterson, John Neil, Jonalie Estenes, and Susan Litteral Mayor Fonzi closed the Public Comment period. MOTION By Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley and seconded by Council Member Kelley to 1 Endorse the Eagle Ranch public participation and project processing outline (Attachment 1 of Staff Report), and, 2. Direct staff to issue requests for proposals (RFPs) for an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Eagle Ranch Specific Plan Project. Motion passed 5.0 by a roll-call vote. 2. Historic City Hall Repair— Historic Cedar Trees — Issues and Options ■ Fiscal Impact: Staff has not estimated the fiscal impact of each of the options due to the unknown construction costs related to tree avoidance ■ Recommendation. Council direct staff to revise and recirculate the City Hall Repair Project Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) (PPN 2004-0141) to allow for the removal of the two Deodar Cedar trees A3 and A4 on the East Mall frontage and one Italian Cypress tree A7 on the West Mall frontage [Community Development] Community Development Director Warren Frace gave the staff report and answered questions from the Council PUBLIC COMMENT The following citizens spoke on this item Jim Patterson, Jim Wilkins, Rachelle Rickard, Tom Lewis, Brian Sturtevant, Chuck Ward, and Karyn Sturtevant. Mayor Fonzi closed the Public Comment period. CC Draft Action Minutes of 8/10/10 Page 5 of 6 13 ITEM NUMBER. A- 1 DATE 09/14/10 MOTION By Council Member Clay and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem O'Malley to direct staff to revise and re-circulate the City Hall Repair Project Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) (PPN 2004-0141) to allow for the removal of all the trees that surround the Historic City Hall except trees Al & A2 on Palma Avenue Motion passed 3 2 by a roll-call vote. (Beraud & Fonzi opposed) COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS None D COMMITTEE REPORTS Council Member Clay Attended the County Mayors Round Table for Mayor Fonzi E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND / OR ACTION None F ADJOURNMENT Mayor Fonzi adjourned the meeting at 10 40 p m 1 MINUTES PREPARED BY Marcia McClure Torgerson, C M C City Clerk/Assistant to the City Manager CC Draft Action Minutes of 8/10/10 Page 6 of 6 14 ITEM NUMBER. A-2 DATE 09/14/10 :p f!,0 o ■ n .wm Pais' 1978 Atascadero City Council Staff Report - City Clerk Conflict of Interest Code - Biennial Review RECOMMENDATION Council adopt the Draft Resolution, updating and amending the Conflict of Interest Code for the City of Atascadero DISCUSSION The Political Reform Act requires every local government agency to review its Conflict of Interest Code biennially (on the even years) to determine if it is accurate and, if needed, to make any necessary amendments The Conflict of Interest Code is a document that designates the positions within an agency that make, or participate in making, governmental decisions that may foreseeably have a material effect on any financial interest. The Code further sets out, in paragraphs called disclosure categories, the specific types of investments, business positions, interest in real property and sources of income that must be reported by the designated positions The City Council is the Code-reviewing body for the City of Atascadero The Political Reform Act requires that this Council adopt any amendments no later than December 30, 2010 This Conflict of Interest Code pertains only to the designated positions listed in Exhibit A. The following officials are exempt from this Code as they are otherwise required to file disclosure statements pursuant to State Law under Govt. Code 87200 Council Members, City Treasurer, Planning Commissioners, City Manager and City Attorney The City Clerk and the City Attorney have reviewed the current Code The proposed amendments to the Conflict of Interest Code incorporate the basic provisions required by Government Code Section 87302 and comply with FPPC regulations The revised list contains a list of designated positions that make, or participate in making, governmental decisions The recommended changes reflect the current staffing of the City of Atascadero The recommended new language is indicated by underlining and the recommended deleted language is indicated by c*r� t. No substantive changes I .r have been suggested 15 ITEM NUMBER. A-2 DATE 09/14/10 FISCAL IMPACT None ALTERNATIVES The Code must be updated The Council is free to add positions to the Code or to suggest any other changes, so long as the changes comply with the Political Reform Act. Changing the disclosure requirements is not recommended It is important that the current positions are accurately described ATTACHMENT Draft Resolution 1400, 16 ITEM NUMBER. A -2 DATE. 09/14/10 DRAFT RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN AMENDED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE WHEREAS, the Political Reform Act requires every local government agency to review its Conflict of Interest Code biennially (in even-numbered years) to determine if it is accurate and up- to-date, or, alternatively,that the Code must be amended, and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Atascadero as follows SECTION 1 Resolution No 2006-092, adopted on October 10,2006, is hereby rescinded. SECTION 2. That the Conflict of Interest Code attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A be, and hereby is, adopted as the Conflict of Interest Code for the City of Atascadero On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote- AYES NOES ABSENT ADOPTED- CITY OF ATASCADERO By- Roberta Fonzi,Mayor ATTEST Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.0 , City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney 17 Exhibit A CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO The Political Reform Act, Government Code Section 81000, et. seg , requires state and local government agencies to adopt and promulgate conflict of interest codes The Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a regulation, 2 Cal Code of Regs Section 18730, which contains the terms of a standard conflict of interest code It can be incorporated by reference and may be amended by the Fair Political Practices Commission after public notice and hearings to conform to amendments in the Political Reform Act. Therefore, the terms of 2 Cal Code of Regs Section 18730 and any amendments to it duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission are hereby incorporated by reference and, along with the attached Appendix in which members and employees are designated and disclosure categories are set forth, constitute the conflict of interest code of the City of Atascadero Designated employees shall file their statements with the City of Atascadero who will make the statements available for public inspection and reproduction (Gov Code Section 81008) Statements for all designated employees will be retained by the City of Atascadero 18 *4%W DESIGNATED EMPLOYEES AND DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES The following positions entail the making or participation in the making of decisions which foreseeably may have a material effect on financial interests Designated Position' Disclosure Category' Assistant City Manager 1 Assistant to the City Manager 1 City Clerk 1 Public Works Director/City Engineer 1 Deputy Public Works Director 1 Associate Civil Engineer 1 Consultants2 1 Community Development Director 1 Deputy Community Development Director 1 Director of Community Services 1 Building Official 1 CiFe n aFsh.,l 1 Fire Marshal Exempt Officials3 1 Administrative Services Director 1 Deputy Administrative Services Director 1 Fire Chief 1 Police Chief 1 Members of all permanent City Commissions, Boards 1 and Committees not otherwise required to file Conflict of Interest Statements Ciro R tt limn Ghief 7 Fire Captain 2 PGIioe-LmewteRant Police Commander 2 Police Sergeant 2 ' In the event that State law or regulations regarding the filing of Conflict of Interest Statements should be amended, this Exhibit shall be changed to include the designated position and category of each official as required by said amendment. 2. Consultants shall be included in the list of designated employees and shall disclose pursuant to the broadest disclosure category in the code subject to the following limitations The City Manager may determine in writing that a particular consultant, although a "designated position", is hired to perform a range of duties that is limited in scope and thus is not required to fully comply with the disclosure requirement described in this Section Such written determination shall include a description of the consultant's duties and, based upon that description, a statement of the extent of disclosure requirements The City Manager's determination is a public record and shall be retained for public inspection by the City Clerk in the same manner and location as this Conflict of Interest Code. 19 3Exempt Officials include the Mayor Members of the City Council, City Treasurer, Members of the Planning Commission, City Manager, and City Attorney, who are all otherwise required to 1400 file disclosure statements pursuant to State Law CATEGORIES OF REPORTABLE ECONOMIC INTERESTS Designated Persons in Category 'T' Must Report: All investments, interests in real property, income, and any business entity in which the person is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or holds any position of management. These financial interests are reportable only if located within and subject to the jurisdiction of the City, or if the business entity is doing business or planning to do business in an area subject to the jurisdiction of the City, or has done business within an area subject to the jurisdiction of the City at any time during the two years prior to the filing of the statement. Designated Persons in Category "T' Must Report: (1) All investments in real property located within or subject to the jurisdiction of the City (2) Investments in any business entity which within the last two years has contracted or in the future foreseeably may contract with the City (3) Income from any source which within the last two years has contracted or in the future foreseeably may contract with the City (4) His or her status as a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or holder of a position of management in any business entity which within the last two years has contracted or in the future foreseeably may contract with the City 82030 INCOME (A) "Income" means (except as provided in subdivision B) A payment received, including but not limited to any salary, wage, advance, dividend, interest, rent, proceeds from any sale, gift, including any gift of food or beverage, loan, forgiveness or payment of indebtedness received by the flier, reimbursement for expenses, per diem, or contribution to an insurance or pension program paid by any person other than an employer, and including any community property interest in the income of a spouse Income also includes an outstanding loan Income of an individual also includes a pro rata share of any income of any business entity or trust in which the individual or spouse owns, directly, indirectly or beneficially, a 10 percent interest or greater "Income," other than a gift, does not include income received from any source outside the jurisdiction and not doing business within the jurisdiction, not planning to do business within the having done 20 business within the jurisdiction during the two years prior to the time any statement ' or other action is required under this title (B) "Income" does not include (1) Campaign contributions required to be reported under Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 84100) (2) Salary and reimbursement for expenses or per diem received from a state, local, or federal government agency and reimbursement for travel expenses and per diem received from a bona fide educational, academic, or charitable organization (3) Any devise or inheritance (4) Interest, dividends, or premiums on a time or demand deposit in a financial institution, shares in a credit union or any insurance policy, payments received under any insurance policy, or any bond or other debt instrument issued by any government or government agency (5) Dividends, interest, or any other return on a security which is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the United States Government or a commodity future registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission of the United States Government, except proceeds from the sale of these securities and commodities futures (6) Redemption of a mutual fund (7) Alimony or child support payments. (8) Any loan or loans from a commercial lending institution which are made in the lender's regular course of business on terms available to members of the public without regard to official status if- (a) Used to purchase, refinance the purchase of, or for improvements to, the principal residence of flier; or (b) The balance owed does not exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000) (9) Any loan from an individual's spouse, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, parent-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, nephew, niece, uncle, aunt, or first cousin, or the spouse of any such person, provided that a loan from any such person shall be considered income if the lender is acting as an agent or intermediary for any person not covered by this paragraph (10) Any indebtedness created as part of a retail installment or credit card transaction if made in the lender's regular course of business on terms available to members of the public without regard to official status, so long as the balance owed to the creditor does not exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000) 21 (11) Payments received under a defined benefit pension plan qualified under Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a) (12) Proceeds from the sale of securities registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the United States Government or from the sale of commodities futures registered with the Commodity Futures Trading commission of the United States Government if the flier sells the securities or the commodities futures on a stock or commodities exchange and does not know or have reason to know the identity of the purchaser 22 ITEM NUMBER. A- 3 DATE 09/14/10 n 1 �ft✓ leis i07e Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Administrative Services Department July 2010 Accounts Payable and Payroll RECOMMENDATION Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for July 2010 DISCUSSION Attached for City Council review and approval are the following Payroll Dated 07/08/10 Checks # 28010 - 28053 $ 27,982 57 Direct Deposits 267,524 20 Dated 07/22/10 Checks # 28055 - 28094 24,370 66 Direct Deposits 236,603 61 Accounts Payable Dated 07/01/10-07/31/10 Checks # 125109 - 125626 & EFTs 848 - 856 2,459,130 05 TOTAL AMOUNT $ 3,015,611 09 FISCAL IMPACT Total expenditures for all funds is $ 3,015,611 09 CERTIFICATION The undersigned certifies that the attached demands have been released for payment and that funds are available for these dema Rach Ile Rickard, Director o Administrative Services ATTACHMENT July 2010 Eden Warrant Register in the amount of $ 2,459,130 05 23 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listinq For the Month of July 2010 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 125109 07/02/2010 ACES TRANSCRIBING&SECRETARIA Accounts Payable Check 11000 125110 07/02/2010 ACTION FAX&PRINTER Accounts Payable Check 23485 125111 07/02/2010 ACTIVE MEDICAL&SAFETY Accounts Payable Check 143.21 125112 07/02/2010 AIRFLOW FILTER SERVICE, INC Accounts Payable Check 30018 125113 07/02/2010 AIR-RITE REFRIGERATION Accounts Payable Check 4,18400 125114 07/02/2010 ALL ABOUT PRODUCE, INC Accounts Payable Check 54140 125115 07/02/2010 ALLY LLC Accounts Payable Check 40080 125116 07/02/2010 AMERICAN MARBORG Accounts Payable Check 10742 125117 07/02/2010 AMERICAN WEST TIRE&AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 24085 125118 07/02/2010 AMI PIPE&SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 112.63 125119 07/02/2010 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS-WEST Accounts Payable Check 10717 125120 07/02/2010 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 38558 125121 07/02/2010 ARMET'S LANDSCAPE, INC Accounts Payable Check 9,87060 125122 07/02/2010 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 16456 125123 07/02/2010 ATASCADERO HAY&FEED Accounts Payable Check 1,11874 125124 07/02/2010 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO Accounts Payable Check 7850 125125 07/02/2010 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO Accounts Payable Check 30 00 125126 07/02/2010 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 1,200 00 125127 07/02/2010 BASSETT'S CRICKET RANCH,INC Accounts Payable Check 108.2' 125128 07/02/2010 BATTERY SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 80 4% 125129 07/02/2010 SHERRY BAZZELL Accounts Payable Check 15882 125130 07/02/2010 BLUEPRINTER Accounts Payable Check 6361 125131 07/02/2010 NICHOLAS P BOONISAR Accounts Payable Check 42.00 125132 07/02/2010 C3 CONSTRUCTION&DEVELOPMENT Accounts Payable Check 82,608 02 125133 07/02/2010 CALPORTLAND Accounts Payable Check 4582.72 125134 07/02/2010 JIM CAMPANA Accounts Payable Check 14500 125135 07/02/2010 SARAH B CARDINALI Accounts Payable Check 22560 125136 07/02/2010 CENTAURI LABS INC Accounts Payable Check 64400 125137 07/02/2010 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL, INC Accounts Payable Check 6000 125138 07/02/2010 KATHLEEN J CINOWALT Accounts Payable Check 161 00 125139 07/02/2010 CORNERS LIMITED Accounts Payable Check 35979 125140 07/02/2010 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 13860 125141 07/02/2010 D B. CONSULTING Accounts Payable Check 3 850 00 125142 07/02/2010 D4 ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 392.97 125143 07/02/2010 DARRYUS LOCK AND SAFE Accounts Payable Check 13516 125144 07/02/2010 DAVEY RESOURCE GROUP Accounts Payable Check 1,71000 125145 07/02/2010 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Accounts Payable Check 1,37300 125146 07/02/2010 MONICA DOMINGUEZ Accounts Payable Check 27.20 125147 07/02/2010 KELLI M. DOWNS Accounts Payable Check 98630 125148 07/02/2010 ED'S FLY MEAT INC Accounts Payable Check 65 7, 24 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listinq For the Month of July 2010 Check Check 'umber Date Vendor Description Amount *MV125149 07/02/2010 ESCUELA DEL RIO Accounts Payable Check 18000 125150 07/02/2010 EWING IRRIGATION GOLF INDUSTRL Accounts Payable Check 59 81 125151 07/02/2010 FASTENAL CO Accounts Payable Check 17637 125152 07/02/2010 FEDERAL EXPRESS Accounts Payable Check 2612 125153 07/02/2010 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC Accounts Payable Check 25331 125154 07/02/2010 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 19140 125155 07/02/2010 FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC INC Accounts Payable Check 10000 125156 07/02/2010 FIRST TRANSIT INC. Accounts Payable Check 21,153 56 125157 07/02/2010 FLUID RESOURCE MANAGEMENT INC Accounts Payable Check 1,24000 125158 07/02/2010 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 42.92 125159 07/02/2010 FREEDOM POWDER COATING Accounts Payable Check 4,55000 125160 07/02/2010 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 15897 125161 07/02/2010 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 39735 125162 07/02/2010 GEMPLER'S Accounts Payable Check 7339 125163 07/02/2010 GOLDING CONCRETE SAWING Accounts Payable Check 40000 125164 07/02/2010 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 870 125165 07/02/2010 H D PETERSON Accounts Payable Check 462.77 125166 07/02/2010 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 376.28 125167 07/02/2010 HOME DEPOT Accounts Payable Check 674.20 125168 07/02/2010 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS Accounts Payable Check 3,88998 X125169 07/02/2010 ICE TEES CUSTOM SCREENPRINTING Accounts Payable Check 67656 125170 07/02/2010 EVELYN R. INGRAM Accounts Payable Check 55062 125171 07/02/2010 JIFFY LUBE/SOUND BILLING Accounts Payable Check 13465 125172 07/02/2010 KABOOM INSTANT RODENT CONTROL Accounts Payable Check 12500 125173 07/02/2010 KCI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC Accounts Payable Check 70000 125174 07/02/2010 L.N.CURTIS&SONS Accounts Payable Check 1,73764 125175 07/02/2010 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC Accounts Payable Check 12572 125176 07/02/2010 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO INC Accounts Payable Check 1,95900 125177 07/02/2010 LEHIGH HANSON Accounts Payable Check 9556 125178 07/02/2010 LISA WISE CONSULTING, INC Accounts Payable Check 76500 125179 07/02/2010 MAINLINE UTILITY CO Accounts Payable Check 2,362.50 125180 07/02/2010 MARK SIMON SEWER MAINTENANCE Accounts Payable Check 30,690 00 125181 07/02/2010 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 27800 125182 07/02/2010 MICHAEL BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 38,785 05 125183 07/02/2010 MICHAEL FREDERICK PAVING INC Accounts Payable Check 3,58602 125184 07/02/2010 MID-COAST GEOTECHNICAL, INC Accounts Payable Check 19000 125185 07/02/2010 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW Accounts Payable Check 26882 125186 07/02/2010 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 70010 125187 07/02/2010 MATTHEW J MIRANDA Accounts Payable Check 5000 125188 07/02/2010 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 10193 125189 07/02/2010 JOHNNY F MITCHELL Accounts Payable Check 30400 25 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of July 2010 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 125190 07/02/2010 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 5 82 125191 07/02/2010 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSC Accounts Payable Check 5597 125192 07/02/2010 NORTH COUNTY SEPTIC SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 11000 125193 07/02/2010 OFFICE DEPOT INC Accounts Payable Check 1,22552 125194 07/02/2010 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 2900 125195 07/02/2010 TARA ORLICK Accounts Payable Check 39 50 125196 07/02/2010 OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 20602 125197 07/02/2010 PACIFIC AUTO GLASS Accounts Payable Check 142.43 125198 07/02/2010 PACIFIC COAST GYMNASTICS CENTE Accounts Payable Check 172.20 125199 07/02/2010 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 22,024 60 125200 07/02/2010 PARADISE COALITION INC Accounts Payable Check 66000 125201 07/02/2010 FLAVIA PAROTTI Accounts Payable Check 19500 125202 07/02/2010 PASO ROBLES FORD LINCOLN MERC Accounts Payable Check 57577 125203 07/02/2010 DEAN PERICIC Accounts Payable Check 63.28 125204 07/02/2010 PETTY CASH-FINANCE DEPARTMENT Accounts Payable Check 31877 125205 07/02/2010 PETTY CASH-FIRE DEPARTMENT Accounts Payable Check 4956 125206 07/02/2010 PETTY CASH-POLICE DEPARTMENT Accounts Payable Check 49762 125207 07/02/2010 JASON M. PLATZ Accounts Payable Check 72.00 125208 07/02/2010 ANDREW G PRATT Accounts Payable Check 30400 125209 07/02/2010 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY INC Accounts Payable Check 1,298 5F 125210 07/02/2010 RADIO SHACK CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 8 644ai►' 125211 07/02/2010 BILL RAINWATER Accounts Payable Check 14500 125212 07/02/2010 ROB DAVIS BACKHOE Accounts Payable Check 15 490 00 125213 07/02/2010 S.D FRANKLIN ELECTRIC INC Accounts Payable Check 1,10000 125214 07/02/2010 S W MARTIN &ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 2,00533 125215 07/02/2010 MICHAEL D SAMANIEGO Accounts Payable Check 1 00800 125216 07/02/2010 SAN LUIS SECURITY INC Accounts Payable Check 1,35450 125217 07/02/2010 KIMBERLY C SEQUEIRA Accounts Payable Check 10500 125218 07/02/2010 SHEPARD ENTERPRISES INC Accounts Payable Check 1,24996 125219 07/02/2010 SCOTT SIMONS Accounts Payable Check 12448 125220 07/02/2010 SLO COUNTY IWMA Accounts Payable Check 5 000 00 125221 07/02/2010 SMART AND FINAL Accounts Payable Check 14838 125222 07/02/2010 DAVID L. SMAW Accounts Payable Check 11400 125223 07/02/2010 SOUZA CONSTRUCTION INC Accounts Payable Check 5,70484 125224 07/02/2010 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN Accounts Payable Check 2,691 00 125225 07/02/2010 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1 47800 125226 07/02/2010 DAVA C SUTHERLAND Accounts Payable Check 23700 125227 07/02/2010 TANKS A LOT HYDRO SCBA&SCUBA Accounts Payable Check 78000 125228 07/02/2010 TASER INTERNATIONAL Accounts Payable Check 59538 125229 07/02/2010 TESCO CONTROLS INC Accounts Payable Check 375 0r 125230 07/02/2010 THE TOP SHOP UPHOLSTERY Accounts Payable Check 330 31d 26 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of July 2010 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount X125231 07/02/2010 JANET TINGLEY Accounts Payable Check 56350 125232 07/02/2010 MARCIA TORGERSON Accounts Payable Check 21 50 125233 07/02/2010 TPG CONSULTING, INC Accounts Payable Check 4,47700 125234 07/02/2010 UNCLE'S BAITS Accounts Payable Check 4080 125235 07/02/2010 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check 54852 125236 07/02/2010 VOID Accounts Payable Check 000 125237 07/02/2010 WALLACE GROUP Accounts Payable Check 2,86794 125238 07/02/2010 WAYNE'S TIRE, INC Accounts Payable Check 3,31768 125239 07/02/2010 WEST COVINA NURSERIES Accounts Payable Check 785 98 125240 07/02/2010 XO PANDORA Accounts Payable Check 1,85000 125241 07/02/2010 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC Accounts Payable Check 411 35 125242 07/02/2010 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC Accounts Payable Check 6,38400 125243 07/02/2010 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC Accounts Payable Check 17615 125244 07/02/2010 ATASCADERO COMMUNITY Accounts Payable Check 31 13300 125245 07/02/2010 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 4800 125246 07/02/2010 ATASCADERO TRAFFIC WAY STORAGE Accounts Payable Check 57600 125247 07/02/2010 LUCA P BENEDETTI Accounts Payable Check 281 00 125249 07/02/2010 CALIFORNIA J.P.I.A. Accounts Payable Check 836 170 00 125250 07/02/2010 CAVENAUGH AND ASSC Accounts Payable Check 99800 125251 07/02/2010 CCAC Accounts Payable Check 20000 '%W 125252 07/02/2010 CCC-ICC Accounts Payable Check 4500 125253 07/02/2010 BRADY CHERRY Accounts Payable Check 30000 125254 07/02/2010 WILLIAM T CLINE Accounts Payable Check 25000 125255 07/02/2010 CNOA REGION VI Accounts Payable Check 20000 125256 07/02/2010 DANIEL E. ERNST Accounts Payable Check 25000 125257 07/02/2010 FIRE CHIEFS ASSC OF SLO CO Accounts Payable Check 1 050 00 125258 07/02/2010 WARREN FRACE Accounts Payable Check 30000 125259 07/02/2010 THOMAS E. GANDY Accounts Payable Check 28100 125260 07/02/2010 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS AS Accounts Payable Check 22500 125261 07/02/2010 DORIAN M. HACHIGIAN Accounts Payable Check 25000 125262 07/02/2010 ICMA Accounts Payable Check 2,55678 125263 07/02/2010 DEBRA K. LEASURE Accounts Payable Check 25000 125264 07/02/2010 JAMES R. LEWIS Accounts Payable Check 25000 125265 07/02/2010 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 50000 125266 07/02/2010 MMASC Accounts Payable Check 6500 125267 07/02/2010 MARTIN E. PARIS Accounts Payable Check 25000 125268 07/02/2010 JOSEPH D PILLOUD Accounts Payable Check 25000 125269 07/02/2010 PROGRESSIVE SOLUTIONS INC Accounts Payable Check 5,11009 125270 07/02/2010 RACHELLE RICKARD Accounts Payable Check 30000 125271 07/02/2010 RICHARD G. ROLSON Accounts Payable Check 70000 ''%wW 125272 07/02/2010 JAMES SCOOLIS Accounts Payable Check 25000 27 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of July 2010 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 125273 07/02/2010 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY Accounts Payable Check 471 0 125274 07/02/2010 RUSS THOMPSON Accounts Payable Check 30000 125275 07/02/2010 TRAINING INNOVATIONS INC Accounts Payable Check 57500 125276 07/02/2010 U S.POSTAL SERVICE/NEOPOST Accounts Payable Check 5 000 00 125277 07/02/2010 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 15000 125278 07/07/2010 S W MARTIN&ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 9,60000 125279 07/07/2010 SDRMA Payroll Vendor Payment 120,263.82 125280 07/09/2010 ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 63000 125281 07/09/2010 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 4000 125282 07/09/2010 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS Payroll Vendor Payment 93000 125283 07/09/2010 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC Payroll Vendor Payment 2,536.16 125284 07/09/2010 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 10 150.77 125285 07/09/2010 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment 1 14730 125286 07/09/2010 SEIU LOCAL 620 Payroll Vendor Payment 855.21 125287 07/09/2010 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 Payroll Vendor Payment 31161 125288 07/09/2010 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 Payroll Vendor Payment 2,77658 848 07/13/2010 RABOBANK, N.A. Payroll Vendor Payment 55,187 74 849 07/13/2010 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYST0 Payroll Vendor Payment 98,343 45 850 07/13/2010 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 17,330 7,%04 851 07/13/2010 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1 30651 852 07/13/2010 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Payroll Vendor Payment 52.14 125289 07/13/2010 ALLSTATE WORKPLACE DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 4,502.24 125290 07/13/2010 CSAC EIA Payroll Vendor Payment 1,18516 125291 07/13/2010 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES Payroll Vendor Payment 1 641 17 125292 07/13/2010 PREFERRED BENEFITS INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 8,65982 125293 07/16/2010 AGP VIDEO INC Accounts Payable Check 3,89000 125294 07/16/2010 AIR-RITE REFRIGERATION Accounts Payable Check 23085 125295 07/16/2010 AMERICAN WEST TIRE&AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 1500 125296 07/16/2010 AMI PIPE&SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 54412 125297 07/16/2010 AQUAMARK POOL CARE Accounts Payable Check 83074 125298 07/16/2010 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 57604 125299 07/16/2010 ARMETS LANDSCAPE, INC Accounts Payable Check 3,63660 125300 07/16/2010 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 8978 125301 07/16/2010 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 1,30538 125303 07/16/2010 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 98497 125305 07/16/2010 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO Accounts Payable Check 19,727 40 125306 07/16/2010 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 1 50697 125307 07/16/2010 ATASCADERO PLUMBING, INC Accounts Payable Check 3544 125308 07/16/2010 BACK TO BASICS EMBROIDERY Accounts Payable Check 86.2'. 28 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of July 2010 Check Check 'umber Date Vendor Description Amount 40,125309 07/16/2010 ALAN BAKER Accounts Payable Check 38667 125310 07/16/2010 AUDREY BANKS Accounts Payable Check 22.25 125311 07/16/2010 BARKS PLUMBING AND APPL. INC Accounts Payable Check 80000 125312 07/16/2010 BATTERY SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 7877 125313 07/16/2010 BCS, LLC Accounts Payable Check 4,972.36 125314 07/16/2010 BLUEPRINTER Accounts Payable Check 6361 125315 07/16/2010 BURKE,WILLIAMS &SORENSON LLP Accounts Payable Check 12,953 08 125316 07/16/2010 BURTON'S FIRE, INC Accounts Payable Check 26639 125317 07/16/2010 C3 CONSTRUCTION&DEVELOPMENT Accounts Payable Check 46,605 04 125318 07/16/2010 CALIFORNIA CODE CHECK Accounts Payable Check 2,71939 125319 07/16/2010 CALPORTLAND Accounts Payable Check 2,84817 125320 07/16/2010 CAL-STATE AUTO GLASS Accounts Payable Check 5500 125321 07/16/2010 KATE CAPELA Accounts Payable Check 17900 125322 07/16/2010 CED CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL Accounts Payable Check 19163 125323 07/16/2010 CENTRAL COAST HEALTHCARE,APMC Accounts Payable Check 11000 125324 07/16/2010 CENTRAL VALLEY TOXICOLOGY INC Accounts Payable Check 17800 125325 07/16/2010 CHEVRON &TEXACO BUS CARD SVC Accounts Payable Check 2,82734 125326 07/16/2010 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL, INC Accounts Payable Check 6000 125327 07/16/2010 CITY OF ATASCADERO Accounts Payable Check 24416 125328 07/16/2010 COAST ELECTRONICS Accounts Payable Check 40416 125329 07/16/2010 COASTAL COPY LP Accounts Payable Check 16639 125330 07/16/2010 CONOCOPHILLIPS Accounts Payable Check 1,94690 125331 07/16/2010 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 1,490.21 125332 07/16/2010 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 4196 125333 07/16/2010 CULLIGAN INDUSTRIAL WATER SYST Accounts Payable Check 16000 125334 07/16/2010 CUSTOM DESIGN SOFTWARE, INC Accounts Payable Check 1,42500 125335 07/16/2010 D4 ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 49455 125336 07/16/2010 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 66348 125337 07/16/2010 DEEP STEAM CARPET CLEANERS Accounts Payable Check 484.25 125338 07/16/2010 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Accounts Payable Check 1,04641 125339 07/16/2010 MONICA DOMINGUEZ Accounts Payable Check 595 125340 07/16/2010 DOVE CREEK COMMUNITY ASSC Accounts Payable Check 2,197 44 125341 07/16/2010 DWIGHT PETERSON LOW BED SVC Accounts Payable Check 24000 125342 07/16/2010 EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC Accounts Payable Check 21650 125343 07/16/2010 EL CAMINO CAR WASH LLC Accounts Payable Check 2990 125344 07/16/2010 EL CAMINO VETERINARY HOSP Accounts Payable Check 7956 125345 07/16/2010 ELECTRICRAFT INC Accounts Payable Check 3 894 76 125346 07/16/2010 ENTENMANN-ROVIN CO Accounts Payable Check 4802 125347 07/16/2010 ESCUELA DEL RIO Accounts Payable Check 72.00 125348 07/16/2010 FEDERAL EXPRESS Accounts Payable Check 2778 '%W 125349 07/16/2010 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 67078 29 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of July 2010 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 125350 07/16/2010 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 72.8 125351 07/16/2010 GEMPLER'S Accounts Payable Check 7340 125352 07/16/2010 CYNTHIA A. GREEN Accounts Payable Check 8775 125353 07/16/2010 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 804 125354 07/16/2010 GROUND UP DESIGN&CONST MGMT Accounts Payable Check 1 16460 125355 07/16/2010 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 31436 125356 07/16/2010 KELLIE K. HART Accounts Payable Check 32760 125357 07/16/2010 HARVEY'S HONEYHUTS Accounts Payable Check 1,091 36 125358 07/16/2010 MIKE HOESE Accounts Payable Check 222.93 125359 07/16/2010 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS Accounts Payable Check 1,01894 125360 07/16/2010 IMPACT ABSORBENTS INC Accounts Payable Check 1,79782 125361 07/16/2010 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Accounts Payable Check 91471 125362 07/16/2010 IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MGMNT Accounts Payable Check 22.78 125363 07/16/2010 JESPERSEN'S TIRE SERVICE, INC Accounts Payable Check 349 90 125364 07/16/2010 JK'S DIESEL UNLIMITED Accounts Payable Check 31908 125365 07/16/2010 JOEL SWITZER DIESEL REPAIR,INC Accounts Payable Check 54733 125366 07/16/2010 L.N. CURTIS&SONS Accounts Payable Check 1,63562 125367 07/16/2010 LANDSCAPES BY STACH Accounts Payable Check 69000 125368 07/16/2010 LEHIGH HANSON Accounts Payable Check 10,245 48 125369 07/16/2010 LOCATE PLUS CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 25 0r 125370 07/16/2010 LOS PADRES COUNCIL Accounts Payable Check 1300basO 125371 07/16/2010 MARTINELLI LANDSCAPE CONST INC Accounts Payable Check 1,551 83 125372 07/16/2010 BECKY MAXWELL Accounts Payable Check 4860 125373 07/16/2010 MID-COAST GEOTECHNICAL, INC Accounts Payable Check 30000 125374 07/16/2010 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW Accounts Payable Check 17098 125375 07/16/2010 DONNA MILLER Accounts Payable Check 1500 125376 07/16/2010 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 31467 125377 07/16/2010 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 71.22 125378 07/16/2010 DIANE NASH Accounts Payable Check 1,22080 125379 07/16/2010 NATIONAL FIRE FIGHTER WILDLAND Accounts Payable Check 8890 125380 07/16/2010 NORTH CO COMMUNICATIONS LLC Accounts Payable Check 32000 125381 07/16/2010 NORTH COAST ENGINEERING INC Accounts Payable Check 45500 125382 07/16/2010 OFFICE DEPOT INC Accounts Payable Check 68393 125383 07/16/2010 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 6050 125385 07/16/2010 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 44,269 38 125386 07/16/2010 PAVEMENT ENGINEERING INC Accounts Payable Check 2,57500 125387 07/16/2010 PFLUMS ATASCADERO MUFFLER Accounts Payable Check 4000 125388 07/16/2010 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY INC Accounts Payable Check 391 81 125389 07/16/2010 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 1632.00 125390 07/16/2010 MICHELLE R. ROGERS Accounts Payable Check 157 5'' 125391 07/16/2010 MARK J RUSSO Accounts Payable Check 145 0%,of 30 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listinq For the Month of July 2010 Check Check lumber Date Vendor Description Amount 125392 07/16/2010 SAFETY DRIVERS ED LLC Accounts Payable Check 3430 125393 07/16/2010 SAN LUIS POWERHOUSE, INC Accounts Payable Check 40906 125394 07/16/2010 SHELL Accounts Payable Check 48707 125395 07/16/2010 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1 05000 125396 07/16/2010 SUPERIOR CRANE&TRANSPORT Accounts Payable Check 48000 125397 07/16/2010 DAVA C SUTHERLAND Accounts Payable Check 23700 125398 07/16/2010 TANKS A LOT HYDRO SCBA&SCUBA Accounts Payable Check 72870 125399 07/16/2010 TAYLOR RENTAL CENTER Accounts Payable Check 2678 125400 07/16/2010 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS Accounts Payable Check 27057 125401 07/16/2010 TESORO FLEET SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 7,17715 125402 07/16/2010 DARIN E.TRAVERSO Accounts Payable Check 24000 125403 07/16/2010 TRIBUNE Accounts Payable Check 30000 125404 07/16/2010 TW TELECOM, INC Accounts Payable Check 78485 125407 07/16/2010 U S BANK Accounts Payable Check 11,373 92 125408 07/16/2010 ULTREX BUSINESS PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 700 125409 07/16/2010 UPS Accounts Payable Check 2.01 125410 07/16/2010 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check 3,24935 125411 07/16/2010 IWINA M.VAN BEEK Accounts Payable Check 572.00 125412 07/16/2010 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 1,79851 125413 07/16/2010 WALLACE GROUP Accounts Payable Check 31611 40wv 125414 07/16/2010 CATHERINE L.WEEKS Accounts Payable Check 44867 125415 07/16/2010 WELL SEEN SIGN COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 23815 125416 07/16/2010 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 188.25 125417 07/16/2010 WILKINS PRINTING Accounts Payable Check 10609 125418 07/16/2010 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 5,30848 125419 07/16/2010 PAUL JEFFREY ZEHNER Accounts Payable Check 72000 125420 07/16/2010 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 617.21 125421 07/16/2010 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC Accounts Payable Check 5 436 32 125422 07/16/2010 ALL ABOUT PRODUCE, INC Accounts Payable Check 19305 125423 07/16/2010 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 38465 125424 07/16/2010 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 681.26 125425 07/16/2010 ATASCADERO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Accounts Payable Check 23 978 00 125426 07/16/2010 BASSETT'S CRICKET RANCH,INC Accounts Payable Check 3508 125427 07/16/2010 CALIF FIRE CHIEFS ASSC Accounts Payable Check 27500 125428 07/16/2010 CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL Accounts Payable Check 20000 125429 07/16/2010 CERTIFIED FOLDER DISPLAY SVC Accounts Payable Check 3,272.26 125430 07/16/2010 CHEVRON&TEXACO BUS. CARD SVC Accounts Payable Check 48500 125431 07/16/2010 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL, INC Accounts Payable Check 6000 125432 07/16/2010 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Accounts Payable Check 4,00000 125433 07/16/2010 COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Accounts Payable Check 15 864 39 `%W 125434 07/16/2010 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 17465 31 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listinq For the Month of July 2010 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 125435 07/16/2010 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 67.24440* 125436 07/16/2010 DISH NETWORK, LLC Accounts Payable Check 8699 125437 07/16/2010 MEGAN J DONOVAN Accounts Payable Check 18.00 125438 07/16/2010 DRIVE CUSTOMS Accounts Payable Check 7000 125439 07/16/2010 ECONOMIC VITALITY CORP OF SLO Accounts Payable Check 5 000 00 125440 07/16/2010 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 41.23 125441 07/16/2010 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 381 70 125442 07/16/2010 FLUID RESOURCE MANAGEMENT INC Accounts Payable Check 85000 125443 07/16/2010 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 2212 125444 07/16/2010 H.D PETERSON Accounts Payable Check 11454 125445 07/16/2010 ICE TEES CUSTOM SCREENPRINTING Accounts Payable Check 8931 125446 07/16/2010 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 2905 125447 07/16/2010 JOHNNY F MITCHELL Accounts Payable Check 1900 125448 07/16/2010 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 1794 125449 07/16/2010 OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 4003 125450 07/16/2010 JASON M. PLATZ Accounts Payable Check 1800 125451 07/16/2010 ANDREW G. PRATT Accounts Payable Check 1900 125452 07/16/2010 ROB DAVIS BACKHOE Accounts Payable Check 1,200 00 125453 07/16/2010 RICHARD G. ROLSON Accounts Payable Check 70000 125454 07/16/2010 S W MARTIN&ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 23,5833- 125455 3,5833"125455 07/16/2010 SAN LUIS OBISPO AIR POLLUTION Accounts Payable Check 1,899 8 ' 125456 07/16/2010 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY VISITOR Accounts Payable Check 5,541 00 125457 07/16/2010 SAN LUIS OBISPO YMCA Accounts Payable Check 6400 125458 07/16/2010 SANTA MARIA TIRE, INC Accounts Payable Check 7995 125459 07/16/2010 SHELL Accounts Payable Check 107.28 125460 07/16/2010 JOHN C SIEMENS Accounts Payable Check 16800 125461 07/16/2010 SMART AND FINAL Accounts Payable Check 12979 125462 07/16/2010 DAVID L. SMAW Accounts Payable Check 1900 125463 07/16/2010 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY Accounts Payable Check 462.80 125464 07/16/2010 TESCO CONTROLS INC Accounts Payable Check 37500 125465 07/16/2010 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 1,54703 125466 07/20/2010 VOID Accounts Payable Check 000 125467 07/20/2010 MARK SIMON SEWER MAINTENANCE Accounts Payable Check 32,638 05 125468 07/20/2010 JOHNNY F MITCHELL Accounts Payable Check 24700 125469 07/23/2010 ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 63000 125470 07/23/2010 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 4000 125471 07/23/2010 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS Payroll Vendor Payment 93000 125472 07/23/2010 AXA EQUITABLE Payroll Vendor Payment 52012 125473 07/23/2010 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC Payroll Vendor Payment 2,5361- 125474 07/23/2010 FLEX-PLAN SERVICES INC Payroll Vendor Payment 160 Obr04 32 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of July 2010 Check Check 'umber Date Vendor Description Amount ,%W- 125475 07/23/2010 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 9,01615 125476 07/23/2010 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP Accounts Payable Check 12500 125477 07/23/2010 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment 1,17052 125478 07/23/2010 SEIU LOCAL 620 Payroll Vendor Payment 84755 125479 07/23/2010 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 Payroll Vendor Payment 31161 125480 07/23/2010 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 Payroll Vendor Payment 2,661.20 853 07/27/2010 RABOBANK, N.A. Payroll Vendor Payment 42,086 96 854 07/27/2010 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEA Payroll Vendor Payment 84,249.23 855 07/27/2010 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 12,490 65 856 07/27/2010 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1,28398 125481 07/28/2010 U S POSTMASTER Accounts Payable Check 474.28 125482 07/30/2010 AGP VIDEO INC Accounts Payable Check 3,23000 125483 07/30/2010 AIRGAS WEST Accounts Payable Check 10665 125484 07/30/2010 ALTHOUSE &MEADE, INC Accounts Payable Check 52500 125485 07/30/2010 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 1,07777 125488 07/30/2010 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 1,158.29 125489 07/30/2010 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 76450 125490 07/30/2010 ATASCADERO RADIATOR, INC Accounts Payable Check 10031 fir+`' 125491 07/30/2010 ATD INC Accounts Payable Check 27500 125492 07/30/2010 BAY LAUREL GARDEN CENTER Accounts Payable Check 6906 125493 07/30/2010 ELLEN BERAUD Accounts Payable Check 6800 125494 07/30/2010 BERNARDS Accounts Payable Check 93,283 11 125495 07/30/2010 BURKE,WILLIAMS &SORENSON LLP Accounts Payable Check 18 132.37 125496 07/30/2010 CALIFORNIA CODE CHECK Accounts Payable Check 42750 125497 07/30/2010 CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION CORP Accounts Payable Check 4,03000 125498 07/30/2010 CENTRAL COAST SPA Accounts Payable Check 38485 125499 07/30/2010 CITY OF ATASCADERO Accounts Payable Check 48700 125500 07/30/2010 COASTAL COPY LP Accounts Payable Check 12676 125501 07/30/2010 DAVEY RESOURCE GROUP Accounts Payable Check 66500 125502 07/30/2010 DOCUTEAM Accounts Payable Check 42.00 125503 07/30/2010 EWING IRRIGATION GOLF INDUSTRL Accounts Payable Check 2,25393 125504 07/30/2010 FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC INC Accounts Payable Check 10000 125505 07/30/2010 FIRST TRANSIT INC Accounts Payable Check 21,852.13 125506 07/30/2010 ROBERTA FONZI Accounts Payable Check 8050 125507 07/30/2010 FRAZEE INDUSTRIES, INC Accounts Payable Check 49737 125508 07/30/2010 GILBERT'S LANDSCAPES Accounts Payable Check 35000 125509 07/30/2010 HANSEN BRO'S CUSTOM FARMING Accounts Payable Check 26,490 00 125510 07/30/2010 NATHAN HASCH Accounts Payable Check 53.90 VAW 125511 07/30/2010 HEWLETT-PACKARD Accounts Payable Check 6,442.09 33 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listinq For the Month of July 2010 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 125512 07/30/2010 HOME DEPOT Accounts Payable Check 79636— 125513 07/30/2010 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS Accounts Payable Check 32473 125514 07/30/2010 INGLIS PET HOTEL Accounts Payable Check 19392 125515 07/30/2010 INTERSPIRO INC Accounts Payable Check 13789 125516 07/30/2010 JOEL SWITZER DIESEL REPAIR,INC Accounts Payable Check 106.25 125517 07/30/2010 K.D JANNI LANDSCAPING INC Accounts Payable Check 36778 125518 07/30/2010 KRITZ EXCAVATING&TRUCKNG INC Accounts Payable Check 1,14000 125519 07/30/2010 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO INC Accounts Payable Check 57500 125520 07/30/2010 MEDWORKS MEDICAL CENTER, INC Accounts Payable Check 32500 125521 07/30/2010 MICHAEL BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 41,809 41 125522 07/30/2010 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW Accounts Payable Check 54919 125523 07/30/2010 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 3075 125524 07/30/2010 NOWDOCS INTERNATIONAL, INC Accounts Payable Check 31881 125525 07/30/2010 OFFICE DEPOT INC Accounts Payable Check 84734 125526 07/30/2010 OLIVE TREE FINE ARTS Accounts Payable Check 74712 125527 07/30/2010 PASO ROBLES FORD LINCOLN MERC Accounts Payable Check 5,482.08 125528 07/30/2010 PERRY'S ELECTRIC MOTORS&CTRL Accounts Payable Check 2,201 01 125529 07/30/2010 PFEIFFER PARTNERS, INC Accounts Payable Check 4,695.28 125530 07/30/2010 PHONE CENTER Accounts Payable Check 1,608.45 125531 07/30/2010 RACHELLE RICKARD Accounts Payable Check 133 0r 125532 07/30/2010 JAMES STEVEN ROBINSON DVM Accounts Payable Check 600 0 125533 07/30/2010 ARMANDO ROJAS Accounts Payable Check 14000 125534 07/30/2010 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SHERIFF Accounts Payable Check 8000 125535 07/30/2010 SANTA MARIA DIESEL SVC INC Accounts Payable Check 2,64497 125536 07/30/2010 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN Accounts Payable Check 78750 125537 07/30/2010 MARCIA TORGERSON Accounts Payable Check 18.70 125538 07/30/2010 TRACE ANALYTICS INC Accounts Payable Check 30600 125539 07/30/2010 ULTREX BUSINESS PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 43364 125540 07/30/2010 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check 2,35568 125541 07/30/2010 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 171 16 125542 07/30/2010 KRISTINA A.ALBRECHT Accounts Payable Check 15000 125543 07/30/2010 ALL ABOUT PRODUCE, INC Accounts Payable Check 33400 125544 07/30/2010 ALL SIGNS AND GRAPHICS LLC Accounts Payable Check 7794 125545 07/30/2010 AMERICAN MARBORG Accounts Payable Check 5373 125546 07/30/2010 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSC Accounts Payable Check 348.00 125547 07/30/2010 AMERICAN WEST TIRE&AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 582.73 125548 07/30/2010 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 22612 125549 07/30/2010 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 16531 125550 07/30/2010 ATASCADERO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Accounts Payable Check 218.73 125551 07/30/2010 ATASCADERO HAY&FEED Accounts Payable Check 435 4' 125552 07/30/2010 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO Accounts Payable Check 799 3boW 34 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of July 2010 Check Check lumber Date Vendor Description Amount *000�1 25553 07/30/2010 BASSETT'S CRICKET RANCH,INC Accounts Payable Check 3508 125554 07/30/2010 BELL'S PLUMBING REPAIR, INC Accounts Payable Check 99400 125555 07/30/2010 MARGE BERLOW Accounts Payable Check 22.00 125556 07/30/2010 NICHOLAS P BOONISAR Accounts Payable Check 2400 125557 07/30/2010 C3 CONSTRUCTION&DEVELOPMENT Accounts Payable Check 61,506 44 125558 07/30/2010 CALIF REDEVELOPMENT ASSC Accounts Payable Check 2,67000 125559 07/30/2010 CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL Accounts Payable Check 66000 125560 07/30/2010 CALIFORNIA POLICE CHIEF'S ASSC Accounts Payable Check 38000 125561 07/30/2010 CAPTO Accounts Payable Check 4000 125562 07/30/2010 SARAH B CARDINALI Accounts Payable Check 370.20 125563 07/30/2010 CASH Accounts Payable Check 60000 125564 07/30/2010 CENTRAL COAST SEA FOOD Accounts Payable Check 45840 125565 07/30/2010 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL, INC Accounts Payable Check 6000 125566 07/30/2010 KATHLEEN J CINOWALT Accounts Payable Check 19950 125567 07/30/2010 CITY OF ATASCADERO Accounts Payable Check 25450 125568 07/30/2010 DON CLICKARD Accounts Payable Check 16000 125569 07/30/2010 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 11910 125570 07/30/2010 DARRYL'S LOCK AND SAFE Accounts Payable Check 1083 125571 07/30/2010 CYNTHIA L. DECKER Accounts Payable Check 70000 125572 07/30/2010 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 1,25698 125573 07/30/2010 ED'S FLY MEAT INC Accounts Payable Check 7650 125574 07/30/2010 EMBLEM ENTERPRISES INC Accounts Payable Check 552.25 125575 07/30/2010 ERIC ESTELLE Accounts Payable Check 11500 125576 07/30/2010 FENCE FACTORY ATASCADERO Accounts Payable Check 12873 125577 07/30/2010 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 19200 125578 07/30/2010 FIRST STRING SPORTS Accounts Payable Check 2,10455 125579 07/30/2010 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 52.56 125580 07/30/2010 ANDREW J GEFTAKYS Accounts Payable Check 90 00 125581 07/30/2010 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 19403 125582 07/30/2010 GOLDEN HILLS AUTO CENTER Accounts Payable Check 1668 125583 07/30/2010 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 977 125584 07/30/2010 H.D PETERSON Accounts Payable Check 108.25 125585 07/30/2010 HANSEN BRO'S CUSTOM FARMING Accounts Payable Check 14 610 00 125586 07/30/2010 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 6950 125587 07/30/2010 HEWLETT-PACKARD Accounts Payable Check 2,615.22 125588 07/30/2010 MICHELE HINES Accounts Payable Check 15000 125589 07/30/2010 JIFFY LUBE/SOUND BILLING Accounts Payable Check 10437 125590 07/30/2010 LANDSCAPES BY STACH Accounts Payable Check 71500 125591 07/30/2010 MARK SIMON SEWER MAINTENANCE Accounts Payable Check 13,987 74 125592 07/30/2010 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 20700 '%NW 125593 07/30/2010 MICHAEL BRANDMAN ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 2,200 49 35 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of July 2010 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 125594 07/30/2010 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW Accounts Payable Check 28 7 125595 07/30/2010 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 82437 125596 07/30/2010 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 2905 125597 07/30/2010 JOHNNY F MITCHELL Accounts Payable Check 7600 125598 07/30/2010 RAYMOND L. MULLIKIN Accounts Payable Check 441 00 125599 07/30/2010 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 3018 125600 07/30/2010 NORTH COUNTY GLASS Accounts Payable Check 2910 125601 07/30/2010 OAK COUNTRY LUMBER&RANCH Accounts Payable Check 88873 125602 07/30/2010 OFFICE DEPOT INC Accounts Payable Check 1,21484 125603 07/30/2010 PACIFIC AUTO GLASS Accounts Payable Check 282.56 125604 07/30/2010 PACIFIC COAST GYMNASTICS CENTE Accounts Payable Check 298.20 125605 07/30/2010 PASO ROBLES FORD LINCOLN MERC Accounts Payable Check 2,73803 125606 07/30/2010 PASO ROBLES HEATING&AIR COND Accounts Payable Check 11800 125607 07/30/2010 LARRY PATAGUE Accounts Payable Check 8000 125608 07/30/2010 PERFORMANCE SWEEPING, INC Accounts Payable Check 12000 125609 07/30/2010 KEN PHILLIPS Accounts Payable Check 45400 125610 07/30/2010 SUSAN PICKARD Accounts Payable Check 11500 125611 07/30/2010 JASON M. PLATZ Accounts Payable Check 3600 125612 07/30/2010 ANDREW G PRATT Accounts Payable Check 11400 125613 07/30/2010 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY INC Accounts Payable Check 618 6F 125614 07/30/2010 RICHARD G. ROLSON Accounts Payable Check 1,050 0 125615 07/30/2010 MICHAEL D SAMANIEGO Accounts Payable Check 37800 125616 07/30/2010 SAN LUIS POWERHOUSE, INC Accounts Payable Check 566.21 125617 07/30/2010 SANTA LUCIA SPORTSMEN ASSC INC Accounts Payable Check 28000 125618 07/30/2010 SLOCAPRA Accounts Payable Check 3000 125619 07/30/2010 SMART AND FINAL Accounts Payable Check 11 58 125620 07/30/2010 DAVID L. SMAW Accounts Payable Check 9500 125621 07/30/2010 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 27500 125622 07/30/2010 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIERS INC Accounts Payable Check 63000 125623 07/30/2010 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS Accounts Payable Check 1 16317 125624 07/30/2010 IWINA M.VAN BEEK Accounts Payable Check 5700 125625 07/30/2010 WELL SEEN SIGN COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 28686 125626 07/30/2010 MARTHA Y WRIGHT Accounts Payable Check 81 00 $ 2,459,130 05 36 ITEM NUMBER. A-4 DATE 9/14/10 rdnn; 'r r: ., .. u 1078�-'7 Atascadero City Council Staff Report— Administrative Services CSAC-EIA Delegation of Authority RECOMMENDATIONS Council adopt the Draft Resolution delegating authority for CSAC-Excess Insurance Authority governance to the Director of Administrative Services to act on behalf of the City Council (except as to actions that must be approved by the City Council) DISCUSSION As of January 1, 2010, the City began obtaining employee group benefit coverage r through the CSAC-Excess Insurance Authority (EIA) The EIA is a risk-sharing pool of California public agencies, and is one of the largest property/casualty and employee benefit public entity risk pools in the nation Governing documents for the EIA insurance and programs are occasionally changed to accommodate new procedures or legal issues In the past, the EIA would require Council to approve each change in governing documents, as well as any changes to the structure of the EIA. The EIA is now allowing the delegation of authority to an individual or position to act on behalf of Council in these matters Such changes to EIA documents would usually be administrative in nature and would not have a significant impact on the coverage provided It is recommended that Council designate the Director of Administrative Services to officially act on behalf of Council with regard to the EIA. FISCAL IMPACT None This delegation of authority is for matters that are administrative in nature and that do not impact group benefit cost or coverage ATTACHMENT Draft Resolution 37 ITEM NUMBER. A-4 DATE 9114110 DRAFT RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, DELEGATING AUTHORITY FOR CSAC- EXCESS INSURANCE AUTHORITY GOVERNANCE TO THE DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TO ACT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero is a member of the CSAC-Excess Insurance Authority (Authority) for group employee benefits, and, WHEREAS, the Authority has determined that it is necessary for each member of the Authority to delegate to a person or position authority to act on the member's behalf in matters relating to the member and the Authority; and, WHEREAS, these matters are primarily administrative in nature and do not impact the City cost or coverage, and, WHEREAS, except as to those actions that must be approved by the City Council, such delegation of authority is necessary in order to carry out the purposes and functions of the Authority with its members, and, WHEREAS, in order to ensure a person or position is delegated with authority to act on the member's behalf in matters relating to the member and the Authority, action by the member's governing body is necessary NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Atascadero as follows Except as to actions that must be approved by the City Council, the Director of Administrative Services is hereby appointed to act in all matters relating to the member and the Authority 38 ITEM NUMBER. A-4 DATE 9/14/10 On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote AYES NOES ABSENT ADOPTED CITY OF ATASCADERO By- Roberta Fonzi, Mayor ATTEST Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.0 , City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney err+' 39 ITEM NUMBER. A-5 DATE 09/14/10 71 - 1 40 1 79 Atascadero City Council Staff Report- Community Development Department Title 8 Building Code Text Amendments Title 9 Planning and Zoning Text Amendments PLN 2010-1364 / ZCH 2010-0159 (City of Atascadero) RECOMMENDATION Council introduce for second reading by title only the Draft Ordinance, to approve PLN 2010-1364 (Zone Text Change ZCH 2010-0159) REPORT-IN-BRIEF One of the City Council's highest priority goals is to encourage economic development and simplify the entitlement and construction process Staff presented a list of potential code amendments to the City Council on June 8, 2010 Staff has prepared a code text amendment of the Council's highest priority revisions to the City's zoning ordinance and building code The proposed revisions are grouped into the following components • Amend the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) requirements for non-residential development and establish a formal design review process • Increase the minimum size of second units and allow the greater use of manufactured housing • Reduce minimum setback requirements in the multi-family residential zone • Add a "personal services-restricted" land use definition and restrict the location of such services in the City • Revisions and clarifications to the zoning ordinance and building code for consistency with adopted City Council and Department policies, as well as implementing the goals and policies of the General Plan The Planning Commission held a hearing on the proposed amendments on July 20, 2010 and recommended approval to the City Council on a 7-0 vote The Planning Commission's recommended changes were minor and are included as a part of this Ordinance 41 ITEM NUMBER. A -5 DATE. 09/14/10 The City Council held a hearing on the proposed amendments on August 10, 2010 and recommended approval of the Draft Ordinance on a 4-1 vote The City Council's revisions were minor and include the following 1 Removal of section 9-6 142 b (8) manufactured homes because the City is no longer required to perform this service The State of California Housing and Community Development has rules in place regarding surrendering of registration 2 Revisions to section 8-3 101 of the Building Code exemptions The Atascadero Fire Department requested additional language to clarify when fire sprinklers are needed for additions The amendment reads as follows Exception 1 . Group R, Division 3 occupancies where the total combined floor area will not exceed 3,000 square feet(278 7 m2) 4-2. Group B and M occupancies whenever single or multiple additions will not exceed 1,000 square feet(92.9 m2) beyond the size of the structure on the effective date of this re ugu ation or the total combined floor area will not exceed 5,000 square feet(464.5 m2), and a second story or greater is not added, and the occupancy is not changed to a more hazardous use. 3 Revisions to section 9-3 701 in regards to massage therapists The amendment reads as follows "Day spas and message therapy where each massage 1400, therapist is certified/licensed by the—,tate a State recognized organization " 4 Substitute "Adult Oriented Business" for "sexually eFieRted bUGORess° in section 9- 3 701 for consistency with the Municipal Code FISCAL IMPACT None ATTACHMENT Draft Ordinance Now 42 ITEM NUMBER. A - 5 DATE. 09/14/10 ATTACHMENT Draft Ordinance DRAFT ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE TEXT CHANGE 2010-0159 AMENDING TITLE 8 AND TITLE 9 OF THE ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE PLN 2010-1364/ZCH 2010-0159 (Citywide/City of Atascadero) The City Council hereby finds and declares as follows WHEREAS, an application has been received from the City of Atascadero (6907 El Camino Real, Atascadero CA 93422), to consider Zone Change Text Amendments regarding the creation of a Design Review Committee, Conditional Use Permit size limitation revisions, land use descriptions for personal services, personal services-restricted and storage, recycling and dismantling of vehicles and material, modification of front setbacks in the RMF zoning district; modification of interior setbacks and open areas, amendments to Chapter 5-Second Residential Units, amendments to residential accessory uses, elimination of interim church uses in the CS and CPK zoning districts, revisions to the recycling and scrap uses, elimination of vehicle storage use requirements for consistency purposes, amendments to the mobilehomes use section, amendments to the non-conforming lots section, revisions to the Chapter 3 exceptions for fire sprinklers in Title 8 of the Building Code and revision to permitted uses in the Downtown Office Zoning District and, WHEREAS, a Notice of Exemption was prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enact this amendment to Title 8 Building Code and Title 9 Planning and Zoning of the Municipal Code, and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) have been adhered to, and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Planning and Zoning Text Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero vobw 43 ITEM NUMBER. A- 5 DATE 09/14/10 at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Planning and Zoning Text Amendments, and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a Public Hearing held on July 20, 2010, studied and recommended PLN 2010-1364/ZCH 2010-0159 for approval, and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on August 10, 2010 studied and considered Zone Change 2010-0159, and, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1 Title 8 of the Atascadero Municipal Code is amended to read as follows 903.2 Where required An approved automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed 1 Throughout all new buildings Exceptions 1 Buildings containing Groups B and M occupancies where floor area is not more than 500 square feet (46 45 m2) and located not less than 10 feet from adjacent buildings on the same property and not less than 5 feet from adjacent property lines 2- Buildings containing Group U occupancies where floor area is less than 2000 square feet (92 9 m2) and located not less than 10 feet from adjacent buildings on the same property and not less than 5 feet from adjacent property lines, unless part of a mixed-occupancy building containing a Group R, Division 3 occupancy 2 -. Throughout an existing building whenever additions exceed ten (10) percent of the total floor area of the existing building and the total combined floor area will exceed 2,000 square feet (185 8 m2), or a second story or greater is added, or the occupancy is changed to a more hazardous use Exceptions 1 Group R, Division 3 occupancies where the total combined floor area will not exceed 3,000 square feet (278 7 m2) 2. Group B and M occupancies whenever single or multiple additions will not exceed 1,000 square feet (92.9 m ) beyond the size 44 ITEM NUMBER. A-5 DATE. 09/14/10 of the structure on the effective date of this regulation or the total combined floor area will not exceed 5,000 square feet (464.5 m2), and a second story or greater is not added and the occupancy is not changed to a more hazardous use. 3 In additions to existing buildings equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system For the purpose of requiring the automatic fire sprinkler systems specified in this chapter, the floor area within the surrounding exterior walls shall be considered as one building An automatic fire sprinkler system need not be installed in spaces or areas in telecommunications buildings used exclusively for telecommunications equipment, associated electrical power distribution equipment, batteries and standby engines, provided those spaces or areas are equipped throughout with an automatic fire alarm system and are separated from the remainder of the building by fire barriers consisting of not less than 1-hour fire-resistance-rated walls and 2-hour fir-resistance-rated floor/ceiling assemblies SECTION 2 Title 9 of the Atascadero Municipal Code is amended to read as follows Chapter 2 Applications, Content, Processing, and Time Limits `err► 9-2.107 Design Review Committee. (a) Purpose The Design Review Committee is established to implement the goals and policies of the General Plan The intent is to ensure that the physical design of new development meets the following objectives. (1) Maintaining the rural character and identity of Atascadero, (2) Enhancing the appearance and character of the City, by reviewing the architecture and site plans for -commercial office industrial single family residential subject to CEQA and multi-family residential projects, (3) Ensuring that development is compatible with surrounding uses and improvements by requiring building designs that provide appropriate visual appearance and site plans to mitigate neighborhood impacts. (b) Design Review Committee—Composition. The City Council shall appoint the Design Review Committee The Development Review Committee shall consist of the following. (1) Two (2) members of the City Council, 45 ITEM NUMBER. A- 5 DATE 09/14/10 (2) Two (2) members of the Planning Commission, (3) One (1) at large member resident of the City. This at large member shall be a resident of the City. The Council shall choose an at large member that best fits the intent of the Design Review Committee. (c) Terms of Service The Design Review Committee members from the City Council and Planning Commission shall serve a two (2) year term. This service term shall commence at the date of appointment. The at large member resident shall have a service term of two (2) years. This term shall begin at the date of appointment by the City Council. (d) Authority. The Design Review Committee has the authority to approve and make recommendation in regards to the architectural appearance, signage, site plan and landscape plan of the following projects. (1) All Multi-family Residential projects. (2) All non-residential projects including. commercial, office, mixed-use, and industrial developments) (3) All Public Facility proiects and buildings (4) Development in an open space zoning district. •r++ (5) Any residential single family residential development requesting a planned development permit. (6) Development projects requiring a precise plan, conditional use permit, zone change or general plan amendment. LZ Meeting. The Design Review Committee shall convene once a week, as needed. This meeting shall consist of the Committee, the Community Development Director, pertinent city staff members and the applicant. -(f) Appearance Review Approval. The Design Review Committee shall take into consideration the following criteria in either approving the design of a project or making recommendations for proiects that require Planning Commission approval. The Design Review Committee may require or recommend additional conditions of approval. The following is a list of criteria that the Design Review Committee shall take into consideration. (1) The goals and policies established by the General Plan, (2) Guidelines and standards for development set forth by the Appearance Review Manual, 46 ITEM NUMBER. A-5 DATE. 09/14/10 (3) The proposed development plan is compatible with and is not detrimental to surrounding land uses and improvements provide appropriate visual appearance, (g) Determination. (1) The Community Development Director shall provide the applicant with correspondence regarding the outcome of the meeting including any additional conditions of approvals that is required or recommended by the Committee. (h) Compliance All requirements imposed by Design Review Committee shall be incorporated into a building permit and completed prior to permit final. Failure to comply with the requirements of Development Review Committee constitutes a violation of this code. (i) Appeals Appeals of decisions from the Design Review Committee shall be made to the Planning Commission and filed within 15 days of the Design Review Committee's decision Any additional appeals shall be consistent with section 9-1.111 of this chapter. If the Design Review Committee cannot reach a decision on a design review issue the Committee may refer this issue to the Planning Commission. 9-2 449-108 Plot plan. ;; 9-2.40&109 Precise plan 9-2.44W110 Conditional use permit. The conditional use permit is the process used to review land use proposals of a nature or magnitude which could significantly affect their surroundings Such land use proposals include (i) Uses that are shown as conditional uses in a particular zoning district; or (ii) Multiple-family residential developments consisting of twelve (12) or more units, even if such a development is listed as an allowed use in a particular zoning district; or (iii)_NGRFe6idential developments GentaiRing ten thousand (10,000) squaFe feet e allowable use in a p (iii) Nonresidential development containing fifty-thousand (50,000) square feet or more of building footprint area even if such a development is listed as an allowable use in a particular zoning district; or WftW 47 ITEM NUMBER A-5 DATE. 09/14/10 (iv) Outdoor commercial and industrial sales and storage developments as defined by 9-9.102 of ten-thousand (10,000) square feet or more, even if such a " development is listed as an allowable use in a particular zoning district. 9-2.44111 Approved plans 9-2 443-112 Permit time limits 9-2 444113 Substantial site work defined 9-2.44-6-114 Project completion 9-2 445-115 Occupancy or use of partially completed projects 9-2 44116 Occupancy with incomplete site improvements 9-2.44117 Extension of entitlement. 9-2 418-118 Lapse of entitlement. 9-2 42-0-119 Applications deemed approved 9-2.424-120 Applications deemed withdrawn 9-2.422-121 Guarantees of performance. Chapter 3 Zoning Districts Article 29 Land Use Descriptions Storage, Recycling and Dismantling of Vehicles and Material -Establishments primarily engaged in the storage, assembling, breams updismantling, sorting, tempGrary storage and distribution of materials, equipment and vehicles. This use maybe located either outdoors or indoors. IncludesFesyslable endue FeuGable SGFap and waste mateFial „ but is not limited to, -auto wrecking yards, vehicle storage areas,and vehicle impounds lots, recyclable /waste material storage and transfer facilities. This doesDoes not include waste disposal sites, which are separately defined. Does not OnGWe,or temporary storage of toxic or radioactive waste materials Personal Services Service establishments primarily engaged in providing non- medicallservices generally inye'ViRg the Gere of the neFsen which aFe nGt mer iGall Fe. atm was a primary use and may include accessory retail sales of products related to the services provided. These uses include the following. beauty shops (includes permanent makeup when less than 10% of overall sales) and barber shops17, day spas and massage therapy where each massage therapist is certified/license by a State recognized organization, shoe repair shops, saURas and het tubs, dry cleaning pickup stores clothing rental, tailors, tanning salons, and , and Felated ^Gtitie&-._pet grooming services, and other similar uses. Personal Services-Restricted. Service establishments that may have a blighting and/or deteriorating effect upon the surrounding area which may need to be dispersed in order to minimize their adverse impact. Examples of these uses include but not limited to the following. check cashing and/or pay day/same day loans fortune tellers Psychics, palm tarot and card readers tattoo and body piercing services pawn shops 48 ITEM NUMBER. A - 5 DATE. 09/14/10 to which the business of pawn brokering or the business of lending money upon personal property, pawns or pledges is done and hot tubs and saunas that are not an accessory to a permitted use. Sexually Oriented QUc;Ress_Adult Oriented Business Any business defined by the Atascadero Sexually Oriented Business Ordinance (see Chapter 5-10 of this Code) as an adult arcade, adult bookstore, adult novelty store, adult video store, adult cabaret, adult motel, adult motion picture theater, adult theater, massage parlor (excludingdda spa as defined by P&FS, nal sepvnnee State licensed massage therapy) sexual encounter establishment, or nude model studio is a sexually oriented business 9-3 223 Conditional uses. The following uses may be allowed in the Commercial Retail Zone The establishment of conditional uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2 109 (Conditional use permits) (a) Amusement services, (b) Bar/tavern, (c) Caretaker residence (see Section 9-6 104), (d) Eating and drinking places with drive-through facilities, (e) Service station (see Section 9-6 164), (f) Public assembly and entertainment; (g) Indoor recreation services, (h) Animal hospitals (see Section 9-6 110), (i) Auto repair and services (see Section 9-6 168), 0) Churches and related activities (see Section 9-6 121), (k) Food and kindred products (see Section 9-6 128), (1) Pipelines, (m) Outdoor recreation services (see Section 9-6 123), (n) Sports assembly; (o) Transit stations and terminals, 49 ITEM NUMBER. A-5 DATE. 09/14/10 (p) Kennels (see Section 9-6 111), (q) Vehicle and equipment storage (see Section 9-6 183), (r) Auto dealers (new and used) and supplies (see Section 9-6 163) (Ord 473 § 2 (part), 2005 Ord 364 § 2 (part), Exh B (part), 1999 Ord 310 § 3, Exh B (part), 1996 Ord 68 § 9-3 223, 1983) (s) Personal Services-Restricted 9-3 232 Allowable uses The following uses are allowed in the Commercial Service Zone The establishment of allowable uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2 107 (Plot plans) and Section 9-2 108 (Precise plans) (a) All uses listed as allowable uses in the CR (Commercial Retail) Zone, (b) Wholesaling and distribution, (c) Light repair services, (d) Apparel and finish products, where areas of use are less than five thousand (5,000) square feet; (e) Electronic and scientific instruments, where areas of use are less than five *40 thousand (5,000) square feet; (f) Furniture and fixtures, where areas of use are less than five thousand (5,000) square feet; (g) Animal hospitals (see Section 9-6 110), (h) Auto repair and services (see Section 9-6 168), (i) Laundries and dry cleaning plants, Q) Stone and cut stone products, where all areas of use are less than five thousand (5,000) square feet; (k) Contract construction services, (1) Food and kindred products (see Section 9-6 128), (m) Kennels (see Section 9-6 111), (n) Personal Services-Restricted, 50 ITEM NUMBER. A - 5 DATE. 09/14/10 (ori) Sexually oriented businesses (see Chapter 5-10) (Ord 473 § 2 (part), 2005 Ord 364 § 2 (part), Exh B (part), 1999 Ord 300 § 2 (3), 1996, Ord 169 § 2 (part), Exh A (part), 1988 Ord 68 § 9-3.232, 1983) 9-3 243 Conditional uses. The following uses may be allowed in the Commercial Tourist Zone The establishment of conditional uses shall be as provided by Section 9-2 109 (a) Amusement services, (b) Auto, mobilehome and vehicle dealers and supplies (see Section 9-6 163), (c) Bar/tavern, (d) Eating and drinking places with drive-through facilities, (e) Health care services, (f) Sales lots (see Section 9-6 139), (g) Caretaker's residence (see Section 9-6 104), 1r' (h) Pipelines,..- (i) Personal Services-Restricted. (Ord 509 § 2, 2007 Ord 473 § 2 (part), 2005 Ord 68 § 9-3 243, 1983) 9-3 253 Conditional uses. The following uses may be established in the Commercial Park Zone with Planning Commission approval The establishment of conditional uses shall be as provided by Chapter 9-2 of this title (a) Animal hospitals, (b) Auto repair and services (see Section 9-6 168 of this title), (c) Bar/tavern, (d) Chemical products, (e) Concrete, gypsum and plaster products, 51 ITEM NUMBER. A-5 DATE. 09/14/10 (f) Eating and drinking places where areas of use are greater than two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet per store, (g) Eating and drinking places with drive-through facilities, (h) Glass products, (i) Indoor recreational uses, Q) Lumber and wood products, (k) Machinery manufacturing, (1) Membership organizations, (m) Mini-storage, (n) Paper products, (o) Paving materials, (p) Pipelines, (q) Plastics and rubber products, (r) Public assembly and entertainment; (s) Sales lots (see Section 9-6 139 of this title), (t) Structural clay pottery products, (u) Textile mills, (v) Transit stations and terminals, (w) Vehicle and equipment storage (see Section 9-6 183 of this title), (x) Warehousing, (y) Auto dealers (new and used) and supplies (see Section 9-6 163 of this title)17 (Ord 489 § 2 (part), 2006 Ord 473 § 2 (part), 2005 Ord 364 § 2 (part), Exh B (part), 1999 Ord 349 § 3, 1998, Ord 311 § 3, Exh B (part), 1996 Ord 169 § 2 (part), Exh B (part), 1988 Ord 75 § 2 (3), 1984, Ord 68 § 9-3 253, 1983) (z) Personal Services-Restricted. 52 ITEM NUMBER. A-5 DATE. 09/14/10 9-3 262 Downtown district allowable land uses and permit requirements. Allowed Uses and Permit P Permitted Use Requirements for Downtown Zoning CUP Conditional Use Permit required Districts — Use not allowed PERMIT REQUIRED Specific Use LAND USE 1 DC DO Regulations RECREATION, EDUCATION & ASSEMBLY USES Libraries, museums, galleries I P P Chapter 4 General Site and Development Standards 9-4 106 Front setbacks. The front setback is measured at right angles from the nearest point on the front property line to the building line All structures are to be set back a minimum of twenty- five (25) feet from the nearest point on the front property line, except where this section establishes other requirements Front setback landscaping and fencing standards are in Sections 9-4 125(a) and 9-4 128 of this chapter, respectively VOW (a) A, RS, RSF, and -LSF and-RM =Zones and Residential- -in CommeMial and Industrial ZOR All residential uses shall have a minimum front setback of twenty-five (25) feet, except as follows (1) Shallow Lots The front setback shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet for any lot less than ninety (90) feet deep (2) Flag Lots Determination of that portion of the site to constitute the required front yard shall be at the discretion of the applicant. (3) Sloping Lot Adjustment. In any case where the elevation of the natural grade on a lot at a point fifty (50) feet from the centerline of the adjacent street right-of- way is seven (7) feet above or below the elevation of the centerline, a private garage may be located, at the discretion of the applicant, as close as five (5) feet to the street property line, pursuant to Section 9-1 112 of this title, provided that portions of the dwelling other than the garage shall be established at the setback otherwise required (4) Variable Setback Block. Where a residential block is partially developed with single family dwellings having less than the required front setbacks and no uniform front setback is established, the front setback may be adjusted (Section 9-1 112 of this title) at the option of the applicant, as follows 53 ITEM NUMBER. A- 5 DATE. 09/14/10 (i) Prerequisites for Adjustment. Adjustment may be granted only when twenty-five percent (25%) of the lots on the block with the same frontage are developed and the entire block is within a single zone (ii) Allowed Adjustment. The normally required minimum front setback is to be reduced to the average of the front setbacks of the existing dwellings, which include attached garages but not detached garages, to a minimum of ten (10) feet. (b) RMF Zone and residential uses in commercial and industrial zones. All residential units shall have a minimum setback of fifteen (15) feet. All garages shall have a minimum front setback of twenty (20) feet. (bc) CN, CP, CR, CS, CT, CPK, IP and I Zones No front setbacks are required Ground floor residential uses are subject to the setback requirements of subsection (a) of this section (1) Adjacent to Residential Zone Where a commercial or industrial zone has a front setback, including a double frontage setback, on a street where more than fifty percent (50%) of the lots in the same block are zoned for residential use, the front setback shall be twenty-five (25) feet, except that a one story building or parking may encroach into one-half (1/2) the required front setback depth (ds) L, LS and P Zone A minimum ten- (10) foot front setback is required, provided that residential uses are subject to the setback requirements of subsection (a) of this section (ed) Double Frontage Lots (1) Selecting the Setback Location Where double frontage setback locations are not specified by subdivision requirements or other applicable regulations, the applicant may select the front setback street unless fifty percent (50%) of the lots on a double frontage block are developed with the same front yard orientation In that case, all remaining lots are to orient their front setbacks with the majority (2) Double Frontage Setback Requirements A full front setback is to be provided adjacent to one frontage, and a setback of one-half (1/2) the required front setback depth adjacent to the other frontage (fe) Establishment of Front Setback on Zoning Map The Planning Commission may establish greater front setbacks than those required in this section by delineating the setback on the zoning map Procedures specified by Section 9-1 115 of this title shall be followed in establishing such setbacks (Ord 68 § 9-4 106, 1983 Ord 82 § 9-4 106, 1984) 54 ITEM NUMBER. A-6 DATE. 09/14/10 9-4.109 Interior setbacks and open areas Detached buildings located on the same site are to be separated as follows (a) Accessory Buildings An accessory building is to be located no closer than six (6) feet from any principal building or as required by the building code (b) Residential Buildings A pFiRsipal-residential building (including a multifamily dwelling) is not to be located closer than ten (10) feet to another pFifls+pal building (residential or non-residential) ^a,,-te-n (10) feet-, OF GRe half the height of the talleF of the Me whi^heyer is ^r^^+or (c) Exemptions. The following accessory structures are exempt from the provisions outlined in this section. (1) Decks (2) Patio covers and landscape structures (3) Structures under 120 square feet when exempt from a building permit based on adopted building code and consistent with the standards set forth in 9- 6.106(b) 3) (4) Similar accessory structures as determined by the Community Development Director. (ed) Nonresidential Buildings Set by the Wn+feFmBuilding Code (Ord 68 § 9- 4109, 1983) Chapter 5 Residential Second Units 9-5.020 Definitions. As used in this chapter- (a) Primary Unit. A primary unit is a single-family dwelling unit on a single- family residential zoned legal lot of record All other uses and structures on said lot shall be accessory to the primary unit. (b) Second Unit. Second residential units are defined as residential occupancy constructions (R) with a kitchen and full bathroom that is accessory to the primary unit and intended for permanent occupancy by a second household vftw 55 ITEM NUMBER. A-5 DATE. 09/14/10 (c) Guesthouse Guesthouses are defined as residential occupancy construction (R) with a full bathroom, no kitchen or cooking facilities and a full bathroom regardless of number or configuration of rooms and are the same as second units for the purposes of defining use and calculating fees (d) Granny Unit. Granny units are defined as residential occupancy construction (R) with a kitchen and a full bathroom and are the same as second units for the purposes of defining use and calculating fees (e) Detached Accessory Structure A detached accessory structure is a structure located on a residential lot occupied by a primary unit, exclusive of second units (f) Office/Art Studios Studios are defined as any type of residential occupancy construction (R) with no kitchens, no overnight stays, cooking facilities and/or no bathing facilities (one (1) water closet is permitted) Studios shall be limited to four hundred fifty (450) square feet. Studios greater than four hundred fifty (450) square feet shall be considered second units Deed restrictions shall be required for any proposed studio with a water closet limiting the use of the studio (g) Workshops and Garages Workshops and garages are defined as utility occupancy constructions (U) with no kitchens, no cooking facilities and/or no residential occupancy requirements (i e Title 24) A utility bathroom with shower or any other plumbing may be installed with a deed restriction that limits the buildings use to nonresidential purposes State approved wood burning appliances are permissible Attached structures may be permitted consistent with 9-5.060 and 9-6.106. (h) Residential Additions Residential additions (additions) are defined as an increase of habitable floor area to a primary residential unit. Additions shall have a continuous, logical internal connection without deers-of conditioned space that provides for access to all portions of the primary unit and addition Doors may not be used to create two separate living spaces. The addition shall not have a secondary kitchen,_however a wet bar is permissible as defined by 9-5.020.(1). Additions must have a minimum 10-foot of shared common wall A breezeway or similar roof connection of unenclosed or unconditioned space regardless of length, shall not be considered to be a residential addition.-. (i) Recreational Vehicle Recreational vehicles are defined as any vehicle, coach, camper, travel trailer, boat, or similar movable residential facility that does not have a permanent foundation Recreational vehicles are not permitted to be used as any type of second unit or residential accessory use (Ord 454 § 3 (part), 2004) (i) Wet Bar. A wet bar is defined as a small counter equipped with a sink for running water consistent with the following 56 ITEM NUMBER. A - 5 DATE. 09/14/10 (1) A wet bar does not include a stove built in microwave dishwasher, or garbage 'err disposal. (2) A gas line shall not be installed in proximity to a wet bar. (3) A wet bar sink shall have a single trap drain size limited to 1 '/z-inches maximum. (4) A wet bar shall include a counter with a maximum eight foot (8') length and not to exceed 24 square feet of total counter space. (k) Any deviations from the above standards may be approved by the Planning Commission through the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. (1) A wet bar does not include a stove built in microwave dishwasher, or garbage disposal. (2)A gas line shall not be installed in proximity to a wet bar. (3) A wet bar sink shall have a single trap drain size limited to 1 '/2-inches maximum. (4) A wet bar shall include a counter with a maximum eight foot (8') length and not to exceed 24 square feet of total counter space. (k) Any deviations from the above standards may be approved by the Planning Commission through the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. 9-5.040 Permit required. (a) Permit Required A building permit application shall be required for the construction or conversion of any second unit. (Ord 454 § 3 (part), 2004) 9-5.060 Development standards. Second units shall be subject to all development standards of the RS, RSF-Z, LSF-Z, RSF-Y, LSF-Y, RSF-X, or LSF-X zoning districts and/or planned development overlay districts in which the property is located, except as modified in this section (a) Floor Area The total floor area of a second unit shall not exceed eigf}t h6lRdFed (900) squaFe feet Gn 19t6 with a net area ef Q.5 a-Fes er less. The total fl re„ of a second URi+, shall .^,^+eX-Geed one thousand-two hundred (4-,0001_,200) square feet en lot with no+ aFea gFea+or+ho6 All development on a lot, including second units, must conform to the development standards of the underlying zoning 57 ITEM NUMBER. A-6 DATE. 09/14/10 district, including, but not limited to, setbacks, building separations, maximum lot coverage, grading limitations, and native tree preservation " (b) Height. Second units shall conform to the height limits of the underlying zoning district. (c) Setbacks A second unit shall maintain the setbacks required in the underlying zoning district for a primary dwelling Detached second units shall not be considered as detached accessory buildings for the purpose of determining setbacks (d) Building Separations A minimum separation of ten (10) feet shall be maintained between the primary dwelling and a detached second unit. (e) Off-street Parking Off-street parking for the second unit shall be provided as follows and in addition to any required parking for the primary unit: (1) GRe GGYeFed, > , shall be provided for eaGh GeGend unit with Me (2) or n;()Fe One (1) covered parking spot for the first bedroom. An additional uncovered or covered parking spot is required for any additional bedrooms. (2) The off-street parking spaces for second units must be on a paved surface, measure ten (10) feet in width if covered, nine (9) feet in width if uncovered, and twenty (20) feet in depth, tandem spaces may be approved for second units, (3) Parking spaces for second units may not occupy driveways and back-up areas that serve garages for the primary dwelling, nor may they occupy circular drives or hammerhead turnarounds that serve the primary unit (which are intended to provide means by which vehicles can enter a street head-first), (4) Parking spaces for second units may occupy areas for required rear and interior side yards, (5) Primary dwellings with three (3) car garages may allow one (1) bay and the driveway space in front of the bay to be used for a second unit off-street parking, (6) If the lot takes access from a collector or arterial street, as designated in the circulation element of the general plan, parking for second units shall be designed so that vehicles exit forward into the street. (f) Unconditioned Spaces. Structures such as -garages and—workshops attached to second units shall be accessory to the second residential unit and shall be limited to an additional 500 square feet. Any additional unconditioned space in excess of 500 square feet or any garage area not provided with direct interior access to the second unit, shall no longer be considered accessory to the second residential unit 58 ITEM NUMBER. A -5 DATE. 09/14/10 (g#) The total maximum amount of paving for parking for both the primary and ' second unit in a front setback is fifty percent (50%) of the front yard setback area (hg) Architectural Design The design of the second unit shall be compatible with the design and scale of the primary dwelling (using substantially the same landscaping, color, materials and design on the exterior) (ih) Private Open Space Requirement. A second unit shall have a minimum private open space area of two hundred fifty (250) square feet. This required open space shall not be located within a required front yard setback. No portion of an open space area shall have a dimension of less than ten (10) feet in width (ji) Attached Second Units If the second unit is attached to the primary dwelling, each shall be served by separate outside entrances The interior wall(s) of an attached unit which separate it from the main unit shall be fire-rated according to the most recent WAOfOffn-Building Code (Ord 454 § 3 (part), 2004) Chapter 6 Special Uses 9-6 106 Residential accessory uses. The standards of this section apply to the specific types of residential accessory structures listed Agricultural accessory structures for the keeping of animals are subject to Section 9-6 112 (a) Swimming Pools Swimming pools, including hot tubs, spas, and related equipment, may be located within any required side or rear setback, provided that they are no closer than eighteen (18) inches to a property line (additional setbacks maybe required by UgGthe adopted building code), and provided that they are fenced as required by Section 9-6 128 (b) Detached Accessory Structures Any detached accessory structure intended for residential accessory uses and accessory storage (1) Limits on Use An accessory structure may be constructed or used solely for noncommercial hobbies or amusements, for maintenance of the principal structure or yards, for artistic endeavors such as painting, photography or sculpture, maintenance or mechanical work on vehicles owned or operated by the occupants, for an approved home occupation, or for other similar purposes (2) Floor Area The gross floor area of a detached accessory structure is not to exceed fifty percent (50%) of the gross floor area of the principal structure VA■r 59 ITEM NUMBER. A - 5 DATE. 09/14/10 (3) Residential accessory structures 120 square feet or less are exempt from requiring a permit if the structure is incidental to the primary use and meets the following requirements. (i) The structure does not create a nuisance, (ii) The use of the structure is permitted under its zoning, (iii) The structure meets the property's rear and side yard minimum setback requirement of three (3) feet if the structure less than twelve (12) feet in height; (iv) If the structure is more than twelve (12) feet in height, standard setback shall be required regardless of exemption, (v) The accessory structure is located outside of the required front yard setback, NO A minimum six (6) feet of separation is required between accessory structures regardless of exemption, unless otherwise noted by the adopted building code If the accessory structures have less than a six (6) foot setback, the aggregate area of the buildings shall be considered one (1) building and shall require a building permit. (34) Number of Structures The number of non-exempt accessory structures requiring a building permit shall be limited to two (2) structures (c) Mini-bike, motorcycle, dirt bike or similar two (2) or more wheel motor vehicle riding is allowed subject to the following limitations (1) No more than two (2) such vehicles shall be operating at the same time (2) Operation is limited to a maximum of two (2) hours in a day (i) This limit applies even if only one (1) such vehicle is being operated (3) Operation is limited to a maximum of eight (8) hours in a week. (i) This limit applies even if only one (1) such vehicle is operated (ii) A week shall be measured from Monday through Sunday (4) Notwithstanding the above, no such use shall be allowed prior to noon on Sundays 60 ITEM NUMBER. A -5 DATE. 09/14/10 (5) Any violations to the above-mentioned limitations are subject to cost recovery for responses to disturbances, as listed in Section 9-14 14 (d) Exceptions to Accessory Structure Standards (1) Detached accessory structures that ev^eed size rens�irementcdeviate from requirements are subject to the approval of a minor conditional use perm+t- ep rmit. (2) Any detached accessory structure in excess of the two (2) structures permitted or when multiple exempt accessory structures (less than 120 square feet) are constructed on the premise that are no longer accessory uses to the primary unit as determined by the Community Development Director is subject to the approval of a minor conditional use permit. (Ord 454 § 3 (part), 2004 Ord 449 § 1, 2004, Ord 412 § 3, 2003 Ord 68 § 9-6 106, 1983) 9-6 121 Churches and related activities Religious meeting facilities are subject to the following standards (a) Location Church facilities shall be located on a collector or arterial (b) Limitation on Use When located in an RS, RSF or LSF Zone, related activities may be limited to a Sunday school, an accessory residence, and small meeting rooms Schools, gyms and facilities other than the sanctuary designed for large gatherings may be prohibited /n\ Interim use in the GS and GPK Innes A GhUrrh may be as an interim (1) Related aGtivities shall be limited to a SURday SGheel and small meetiRg (2) Days and hours ef eperatien shall be limited te Sundays and week Rights ter n9Fina4l hl 16inecc hours, three (3) years. Thereafter, the Planning G . . Fnay gFaRt a E)Re (I) th e)den�siG -aet te-eXGeed-two (2}years. (Ord 169 § 2 �n'���h. G 6 1 21 1 S93) 9-6 131 ReGyGling and sr.FaP Storage, Recycling and Dismantling of Vehicles and Materials. (a) Location At least five hundred (500) feet from any school, church, hospital, public building, commercial, or residential zone 61 ITEM NUMBER. A - 5 DATE. 09/14/10 (b) Minimum Site Area One acre (c) Parking Requirement. Two (2) spaces, plus one space for each five thousand (5000) square feet of use area (d) Site Design and Operation All outdoor and indoor Recycling facilities,aP4 wrecking yards, and impound lots are subject to all provisions of Section 9-6 140 (Ord 68 § 9-6 131, 1983) 9-6 140 Storage yards Outdoor storage yards, gexcluding the storage of vehicles in ether than a day use parking lot or garage, are subject to the provisions of this section The storage of vehicles in a public or commercial parking lot or garage is subject to Section 9-4 114, the storage of wrecked,sr-abandoned vehiGles, or vehicles being dismantled, is subject to Section 9-6 131, in addition to this section (a) Site Design Standards (1) Access There shall be only one access point to a storage yard for each three hundred (300) feet of street frontage Such access point is to be a maximum width of twenty (20) feet and shall be provided with a solid gate or door (2) Screening A storage yard, except a temporary offsite construction yard, is to be screened from public view on all sides by solid wood, painted metal or masonry fencing, with a minimum height of six (6) feet. All required screening shall be continuously maintained in good condition to assure that its intended purpose is accomplished This requirement may be waived through adjustment (Section 9-1 112), when (i) The side of a storage yard abuts a railroad right-of-way; or (ii) The surrounding terrain, existing vegetation intended to remain or other conditions would make fencing ineffective or unnecessary for the purpose of screening the storage yard from the view of public roads (3) Parking Requirement. None, provided that sufficient usable area is available to accommodate all employee and user parking needs entirely on-site (4) Site Surfacing A storage yard shall be surfaced with concrete, asphalt paving, crushed rock, or oiled earth, and be maintained in a dust-free condition (5) Office Facilities When no buildings exist or are proposed on a storage yard site, one commercial coach may be utilized for an office, provided that such vehicle is equipped with skirting, and installed pursuant to the permit requirements of Title 8 of this Code (the building and construction ordinance) 62 ITEM NUMBER. A - 5 DATE. 09/14/10 (b) Operation Except for vehicles or freestanding equipment, materials within a storage yard are not to be stacked or stored higher than six (6) feet, unless screening requirements have been waived or modified pursuant to subsection (a)(2)(ii) of this section, or unless a higher wall or fence is constructed at the required setback line under an approved building permit. (Ord 68 § 9-6 140, 1983) 9-6 142 individual mobolehomesManufactured Homes When used for permanent residential occupancy, mel sman ufactu red homes are subject to the standards of this section, in addition to Title 8 of this Code (the buildiRg and GenStFUGtOGR eFdiRaRGeBuilding, ) +leh�6Manufactured homes used as temporary offices or dwellings are subject to Section 9-6 172 et seq Mobilehemes-Manufactured homes in mehileheme sales lots are subject to Section 9-6 139 (a) Location A manufactured home is to be located as follows (1) Within an approved mobilehome park or subdivision, (2) On any single-family residential parcel ah subject to the mob+lehame standaFdsmanufactured home standards specified in subsection (b) of this section err (b) Manufactured Home Standards (1) T4c-If a manufactured home is considered a mobilehome, the structure shall be certified under the National Mobilehome Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (2) The manufactured home shall be placed on an approved permanent foundation system An approved foundation system shall include any foundation system approved by the State Department of Housing and Community Development or any foundation designed by an engineer or architect in compliance with applicable provisions of the I Iniferm-adopted Building Code (3) Roof oyerhaR9 reefing material and e)derier siding whish shall e)deRd to At the time of permit application, the Planning Director shall review the architectural features and treatment of the proposed manufactured home with similar features on existing dwelling within the area:hall make the mnhil Tem e GGmpatible The decision of the Planning Director may be appealed to the Planning Commission and the decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council, as set forth in Section 9-1 111 63 DAi. (4) Mobilehemes Manufactured homes shall have a minimum \I', fifteen (20J 5) feet. Manufactured homes with widths less than fifteen (15) fee, permitted with approval by the Design Review Committee. (54) Utility connections including water, sewer, gas and electric shall be made permanent in the same manner as conventional housing Utility shutoff valves shall be accessible and shall not be located under or behind siding or skirting of a manufactured home (65) No additions or other structural modifications shall be made to the ease-structure without prior approval from the State Department of Housing and he City (76) An application shall include all information necessary to comply with State of California regulations, as well as other permit information and fees established by the City for its processing ef a mabilehemeof an application that these items eF lost. When the mobileheme is new and has ReveF been meWehome is new and has never been registered n lvT✓1 ..v.,,v ,v �,v•♦ aw1,M �,awV never VVZ.IT-rti�TT. titiTGq: (c) Storage Unoccupied mobile#emes manufactured homes that are not fixed to a foundation or a prepared permanent site are to be stored only in a mobilehome sales lot, a storage yard, or in a mobilehome park. (Ord 68 § 9-6 142, 1983) 9 6.183 Veh"rle storage. This seGtien applies t al paFking lots, garage and GtheF establishm `MOV 64 ITEM NUMBER. A-5 DATE. 09/14/10 Chapter 7 Non-Conforming Uses 14Ar 9-7 113 Nonconforming lot defined Any lot having an area less than the smallest minimum parcel size required by this title or other ordinances, is a Ie al nonconforming lot if- (a) The lot is shown on a duly approved and recorded subdivision or parcel map, or (b) The lot eligible been issued; a certificate of compliance or a conditional certificate of compliance , 4 9g3) 9-7 114 Use of nonconforming_-lots A legal nonconforming lot may be used developed for any-uses identified as an allowable or conditional use by mate Title 9-3-provided the minimum si*�-r-ea fegt�+ eats- development standards established in for a6 particular uses are are satisfied This includes structures that are partially or completely destroyed that are conforming uses. 65 ITEM NUMBER. A -5 DATE 09/14/10 SECTION 3 A summary of this ordinance, approved by the City Attorney, together with the ayes and noes, shall be published twice at least five days prior to its final passage in the Maio Atascadero News, a newspaper published and circulated in the City of Atascadero, and, before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its final passage, in the Atascadero News, a newspaper published and circulated in the City of Atascadero A copy of the full text of this ordinance shall be on file in the City Clerk's Office on and after the date following introduction and passage and shall be available to any interested member of the public INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on , and PASSED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero, State of California, on by the following roll call vote AYES NOES ABSTAIN ABSENT CITY OF ATASCADERO Roberta Fonzi, Mayor ATTEST Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney 66 ITEM NUMBER. A-6 DATE 09114110 n 1918 �^ � 1979 Atascadero City Council Staff Report- Community Services Department Temporary Road Closure Colony Days Parade Route RECOMMENDATION Council adopt the Draft Resolution establishing a temporary Colony Days Parade Route on Saturday, October 16, 2010, and establishing associated tow-away and "No Parking" zones and road closures from October 14 — 17, 2010, at the dates, times and locations as specified in the Draft Resolution DISCUSSION * ' On Saturday, October 16, 2010, staff is proposing to close EI Camino Real, from Highway 41 to Traffic Way, from 8 00 a m until 1 00 p m , to conduct the annual Colony Days Parade The route for this year's Colony Days Parade is proposed to begin and end at Olmeda Avenue Additional road closures listed on the Draft Resolution (Attachment 1) are required for parade staging and events related to the Parade The Annual Colony Days Parade is coordinated by the Colony Days Committee and Main Street. "Tent City" and festivities following the parade will be centered in and around the Sunken Gardens Palma Avenue and East and West Mall are proposed to be closed in order to serve as a staging area for several of the events and vendor booths FISCAL IMPACT No net fiscal impact to the General Fund, as the road closure fee covers the staff time and equipment required for traffic control and clean-up related to this event (estimated at $2,600 00) ATTACHMENTS 1 Draft Resolution 2 Proposed Parade Route 3 Hwy 41 Detour Route 67 ITEM NUMBER. A-6 DATE. 09/14/10 DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA CREATING A TEMPORARY COLONY DAYS PARADE ROUTE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero that Colony Days parade route is hereby established as Olmeda Avenue to West Mall to Lewis Avenue to Capistrano Avenue to Santa Ysabel Avenue to El Camino Real to Traffic Way and ending at Olmeda Avenue with the Colony Day Festivities centered around the Sunken Gardens BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in order to provide a reserved route for the parade, staging and associated activities, the following actions are required Thursday, October 14,2010 through Sunday, October 17, 2010—24 hours Establish No Parking and tow-away zone • East Mall— South-side only, from 5901B to the entrance to the City Parking Lot Saturday,October 16, 2010—6 00 a.m. until 5 00 p.m. Establish road closure and tow-away zone • East Mall, from El Camino Real to Lewis Avenue • West Mall, from El Camino Real to Olmeda • Palma Avenue, from East Mall to West Mall Saturday,October 16, 2010—8:00 a.m. until 1.00 p.m. (Hard closure at 9.00 a.m.) Establish road closure and tow-away zone • El Camino Real, from Hwy 41 to Traffic Way • Traffic Way, from El Camino Real to Olmeda • Lewis Avenue, from Traffic Way to Capistrano • Capistrano, from Lewis Avenue to Hwy 41 • Hwy 41 from Capistrano/Santa Ysabel to El Camino Real • Palma, from West Mall to Traffic Way • All of West Mall, from El Camino Real to the Capistrano Bridge • Olmeda, from Traffic Way to West Mall PASSED AND ADOPTED at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Atascadero held on the 14 n of September, 2010 68 ITEM NUMBER. A-6 DATE 09/14/10 VANW On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote AYES NOES ABSENT ADOPTED CITY OF ATASCADERO Roberta Fonzi, Mayor ATTEST Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.0 , City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney 69 ITEM NUMBER. A-6 DATE 09114/10 r %VO w -Q AMUT s, t' o �r 9 �• j s 0 Colony Days 2010 - Parade Route I Parade Iftm fto" 6, .t WIav SbV, (Snot nar vws ?. LovAs Bridge 7 ParEngs 3. .JudgmWAnnotwciriq Plattorim �'1li�U#.i'Obos(G Qa ♦AnrK>unt�rip A4.tk�rrr 4. Median.drip(Street nar caws) (%wf a r"10.0fol S. ;carltan HOW *400 70 a y m xgz ' -n D M Zm m m �� 'fin z j};1S3M 9Ad yq ENSb \MRICME G m2 YP 'SaY _ O a PUEBC�j ^j 9 a i � 1NNN�adW ^ j c nM,'on m>Yi>o A Z>p Z O<O" O> l v oora 4 � C "� DXgm sz"o DO 1■ N OZI KNN DA N " T N z O m ��0 v oo O Z ..-Z pO T > mm 061 TO D OO iC OA 0 CC M Z7 o°�" 70M C) O 0 00 f'l n � > ��nls w m m �R�fM�a sa w�mRa'1 w n COLONYDAYS 2M CITY OF HOFNVAY 41 DETOUR ROUE ATASCADERO 71 ITEM NUMBER. A-7 DATE. 09/14/10 n 1918 ■ 1979 ASSCADF�// Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Police Department Contract for Animal Care and Control Services FY 2010 - 2013 RECOMMENDATION Council authorize the Mayor to execute a three-year contract with the County of San Luis Obispo for the continued provision of Animal Control Services from July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2013, in the amount of $239,233 00 for the first year, with annual CPI adjustments thereafter DISCUSSION ` ' For many years, the City has contracted with the County of San Luis Obispo for the provision of animal care and control services The Contract includes emergency and non-emergency response of Animal Services officers for injured and stray animals, investigative service for animal bites, abuse and neglect; sheltering and quarantine services, dog licensing, animal adoption, and other services as required either by State law or City Municipal Code The most recent contract extension with the County expired on June 30, 2010 All other incorporated cities in the County also contract with the County for animal services and these contracts also expired on June 30, 2010 The Police Department administers the contract on behalf of the City The last three year contract with the County expired on June 30, 2009 In May 2009, in preparation for a new three-year contract, the City was notified that the contract costs being proposed by the County would substantially increase Contract costs had already increased since 2006 largely because the County had not been achieving full cost recovery from the cities utilizing their services However, the cost increases being proposed for 2009 through 2012 caused concern for all of the cities involved Staff representing all seven contract cities worked with the County to form a committee to conduct an in-depth study and analysis of the animal services being provided to the cities and the associated costs The study team was comprised of representatives from San Luis Obispo County Administration and the County Health 73 Agency, the County Animal Services Manager, the Police Chiefs from the Cities of San Luis Obispo and Arroyo Grande, and the City of San Luis Obispo Finance 1000 Director In 2010, the Council authorized a contract extension for the County to provide animal control services through June 30, 2010 in order to allow the team to complete the study Similar contract extensions were executed by the other contract cities Since then, the study has been completed, however, additional time was needed to implement the recommended actions from the study in order to impact service costs Therefore the one-year contract extension was approved ending June 30, 2010 On Wednesday, May 19, 2010, the various city police chiefs met with the County to review the contract language On June 19, 2010, the County submitted the document to each City in preparation for Council review The contract cost to Atascadero at that time was $244,87500 On June 301h, the County identified a cost savings for the City of Atascadero in the amount of $5,642 00, bringing the new final contract amount from $244,875 00 down to $239,233 00 FISCAL IMPACT The fiscal impact of approving this contract is $239,233 00 for the first year, with annual •,,,,r CPI adjustments thereafter The adoption of the " Service-based Method" will increase the City' s costs for this three-year contract using the new allocation method as discussed in the attached " Study Findings" Document In addition, this three-year contract under consideration includes an annual adjustment in City fee rate determined by calculating the percentage increase of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustment during the preceding calendar year This adjustment will be calculated by the County no later than May 1St of each year and will become effective on July 1St of that year Additionally, in the event of significant changes (increase or decrease) in financial conditions identified as operating costs or revenue received to the extent that these changes result in a 10% increase/decrease in the total County Animal Services General Funds required, the County will consider an increase/decrease to City fees above or below the annual adjustment in City fees Notification of the significant change in financial condition will be made to the City within 30 days prior to an increase/decrease in the rate After many years of substantial increases to the animal services contract costs, the County has reached " full cost recovery" for each municipality Although pricing will adjust for inflation each year, large adjustments are not anticipated 74 ALTERNATIVES 1 Council could choose not to approve the Animal Services Contract with the County This would leave the City without the ability to provide such services and without a viable in-house or contract alternative Many of the services are required by law Therefore, staff does not recommend this alternative 2 The Council could direct staff to negotiate different contract terms to increase or decrease services and associated costs Extensive discussions have occurred with County representatives regarding the services provided Services as proposed in the contract are necessary (and many are legally mandated) and the costs are reasonable Thus, service reductions would not be desirable nor is it believed that continued negotiation with the County would result in a reduction in contract costs ATTACHMENTS 1 Study Findings 2 Contract for Animal Care and Control Services from July 1 , 2010 to June 30, 2013 in the amount of 5239,233 00 75 Attachment 1 Study Findings The Animal Services Committee met approximately six times during the study period The County representatives on the committee were open and collaborative in their approach and provided an abundance of information to the City representatives to increase understanding about the Animal Services function, including laws governing the treatment of animals and the costs involved in providing the services The committee experience proved to be extremely worthwhile and productive, and the group has agreed to continue as a new Animal Care and Control Coordination Group in order to maintain open lines of communication and collaboration among the County and the contract cities In the future, the group will focus on reasonable methods to promote responsible ownership of animals through licensing and micro-chipping in order to reduce costs for the contract cities and the County and promote increased safety for pets The following are key findings from the committee' s analysis of the animal services being provided to the cities 1 Program costs are reasonable The County provides a wide variety of animal services, many of which are driven by legal requirements and community expectations The total budget for the Animal Services Division for FY 2010-11 is about $2 4 million, down from $2 7 million the previous year Costs would be significantly higher were it not for the use of county jail inmates and volunteers who work in the Kennel About 45% of the budget is for the operations of the County Animal Shelter, the remainder of the budget is for field services (about 52%) and education (3%) Revenue generated through animal licensing and service fees off-set some of the program costs for the County and contract cities The study committee reviewed the animal services budget in detail and is satisfied that costs are reasonable and appropriate for the services being provided In addition, the County has been very responsible in controlling and reducing costs in order to help balance the County budget and to be sensitive to the fiscal challenges facing the cities 2 Data collection is accurate Services provided are allocated to each city or to the County (unincorporated areas) based on the location of service calls and/or the address of animal owners using the various services The County utilizes specialized computer software to track services, animals and owners in order to 77 Attachment 1 allocate costs and monitor activity trends Address information is accessed from the U S Postal Service zip code database which tends to be very accurate *at# Audits of calls for service in several cities indicated a high rate of accuracy of data collection and address coding 3 A new cost allocation methodology was needed- In the past, the County allocated costs to the contract cities using a method that assigned a " service factor" to each city, which measured certain services to determine if a city was using more or fewer services in proportion to the city' s population Analysis of this method revealed that it is deficient in accurately allocating costs and revenue based on the services used by each city In addition, this method proved to be complex and confusing to users In order to develop a new cost allocation methodology, the committee compared the two other cost allocation methods used by various counties in California a) Per Capita Method. With this method, costs and revenue are allocated to contract cities and the County based solely on the percentage of resident population in each jurisdiction This method is very straight-forward and easy to administer However, it assumes each city and the County are using about the same level of service proportional to their population (i a each resident is using about the same amount of services and generating about the same amount of revenue) An analysis of actual usage of animal control services by each city revealed this was not the case Some cities tend to use services at a much higher frequently than others, and some cities generated significantly greater revenue than others Allocating costs and revenue based on a per-capita model would result in cities that use fewer services and/or generate more revenue having to effectively subsidize those cities that use a disproportionately higher share of services b) Service Factor Method. This is the method currently used by the County Costs and revenue are allocated to the cities and County based on the assignment of a Service factor to each city, which measures certain services to determine if each city is using more or fewer services in proportion to the city' s population Analysis of this method revealed that it is deficient in accurately allocating costs and revenue based on the services used, and the revenue generated, by each contract city In addition, this method has proven to be complex and confusing to users c) Service-based Method. This model allocates costs and revenues to the cities (and to the County for unincorporated areas) based on each city' s actual use of services and revenue generated Usage is measured by allocating actual field calls, animal impounds, and licenses issued (allocated by 78 Attachment 1 address of animal owner) This method provides a more direct and *ftlK measurable relationship between the actual amount of service being provided to a city, combined with the actual revenue generated by a city through animal licenses and other fees, and the costs charged to the city for that service Cities that have a lower rate of service and/or generate more off-setting revenue pay lower contract fees than cities with higher usage rates After considering all three cost allocation methods, staff from each contract city and the County agreed that the service-based methodology described above is the most fair and accurate way to allocate costs and revenue The new three-year contract being proposed reflects this new cost allocation method Contract Provisions and Costs The proposed contract provides for the provision of Animal Care and Control services to the City for three years, through June 30th, 2013 Services include, but are not limited to • Sheltering and medical care of stray, owner surrendered, confiscated, and quarantined household animals • Reunification of sheltered animals with owners or adopted into new homes • Receipt and publication of lost and found animal reports • Response to calls for service from the Police Department or residents for stray or loose animals, dangerous or vicious animals, bite and neglect/abuse investigations, potential rabies exposure investigations and quarantines, pick up of deceased animals • Regulation of breeders and sales of domestic animals • Animal-related nuisance investigation • Enforcement of state and local animal-related laws The contract fee for FY 2010-11 is $239,233 00 The fee will be increased annually for inflation based in the percentage increase of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) during the preceding calendar year Should the CPI decrease, service fees will remain unchanged In addition, the City or the County may request a service fee rate review once each year if desired The proposed contract fee was calculated using the new Service-based methodology, which resulted in an increase in cost for the City The new methodology revealed that the City of Atascadero is utilizing animal services at a higher rate than all the other cities in the County, with the exception of the City of Paso Robles, however this usage rate was not accurately reflected in the prior cost allocation methodology As such, cities using significantly lower rates of service 79 Attachment 1 were paying more than their fair share and other cities were paying less The new cost allocation methodology corrects for this, resulting in higher rates for two cities, Atascadero and Paso Robles, and lower rates for the other five cities For comparison, the City paid $199,440 00 per year for service using the old cost allocation methodology The proposed contract represents a $39,793 00 increase in costs from the previous year with the same level of service for City residents The transition to a Service-based cost allocation model was supported by staff representatives from all the contract cities This finding was unfortunate for the City of Atascadero However, the study also identified opportunities for revenue increases and cost savings measures which were able to offset the total cost of providing animal services countywide After many years of substantial increase to the animal services contract costs, the County has reached " full cost recovery" for each municipality Although pricing will adjust for inflation each year, large adjustments are not anticipated A group comprised of local law enforcement and County officials will continue to meet regularly to work toward offsetting costs through various proposed policy changes and new and/or increased revenues 80 Attachment 2 *4%W CONTRACT FOR ANAUL CARE AND CONTROL SERVICES THIS CO-NTRACT is inade and entered into by and between tile County of San Luis Obispo,a public entity in the State of California. (-County")and,Atascadero.an incorporated city in the State of California.('City ). WITNESSETH. WHEREAS CounrN has established the,Division of Aniniz.I Services to provide animal care and control functions including the enforcement of the ordinances of San Luis Obispo County Code Title 9 and of California state codes pertaining to the care,keeping,and management of animals.and WHEREAS County through Anneal Services.maintains and operates an aninial shelter and a humane edtication progran2,-and 'WTHEREAS, Cit.,, is desirous of contracting with County for the provision of such senlice'S'. NOW THEREFORE,in consideration of the covenants.conditions,agreements.and stipulations set forth herein,the parties hereby agree that County, shall perform the servaces described herein for the compensation set forth herein,subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein. 1 Services- The parties agree to perforin the services described in ExIbubit A,attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if sen forth in Rill at this point. 2 I Compensation- The parties agree to the compensation described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in fiIII at this point 3 Duration. The parties agree to the duration described in Exhibit C.attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full at this point. 4 General Conditions- The parties agree to the general conditions described in Exhibit D attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in fall at thus point, 5 Notices. Notices required in this contract shall be.provided to COUNTY CITY Eric Anderson.DVM Jim Mulhall,Chief of Police Animal Services Manager City of Atascadero PO Box 3760 5 501 El Camino Real San Luis Obispo.CA 93406 Atascadero CA 934-12 Page I of 2 *4w 81 Attachment 2 I\ WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this agreement as of the state set forth below CITY OF AT.ASCADERO An Incorporated City in the State of C alifornia Bv- N1AYOR Date Ciry of Atascadexo ATTEST By- CITY CLERK Date City of Arascadero COUNTY COUNSEL. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL EFFECT WARREN R.JENSEN County Counsel Bt'. KATHY BOUCHARD Date Deputy County Counsel COL `TY OF S-A.N LUIS OBISPO A Public Entity in the State of California By- FRANK XIECHAN11 Date Chairtuan of the Board of Supervisori, ATTEST Bv- JULIE RODENVALD Date County Clerk and Ex-Officto Clerk- of the Board of Supen,-isors Page 2 of 2 1%00� 82 Attachment 2 *41W CONTIEUCT FOR ANINIAL CARE AND CONTROL SERVICES EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES 1) County Obligations.The County shall perfonn the followmg duties.. a,) Shelter Sen? es i) Maintain,or cause to be.maintained-an annual slielterwheteat stray owner surrendered-confiscated,quarantined and custodial)}'impounded household pets are received and provided with appropriate care,housing,and shelter sen'tceii in accordance with state regulations local ordinances arid policies governing the humane treatment of such animals. n) Provide sernces allowing sheltered annuals to be returned to their owners adopted into new homes,or to be humanely.euthanized. tri)Provide for the receipt and publication of lost and found animal reports. iv) Provide services for the hutnatie euthanasia of household pets and for the disposal of there remains. b) Ficid ServIcas i) Receive and respond to public calls for service related to alleged violation of local or state codes pertaining to the care keeping,treatment,and managernent of alumals. ii) Provide for the response to any of the follo-,ving circunistances 24 hours a day seven days a week: (1)Domestic annuals posing in active and present threat to public safety (2)Domestic adinnals winch are severely injured,ill,or in eminent risk and Nvhose owner is unictiovni,or unavailable (.3)Domestic or wild aininal demonstrating signs of possible rabies infection. (4) Calls for assistance from law enforcenient or eniergencN,response persoimel- (5)Reported annual biles where the animal remains in the area unconfined and whose owner is utilmovm or unavailable. (6) Loose livestock roarrung on roadways or other public areas. Exhibit A,Page 1 of 3 I%W 83 Attachment 2 in) Provide for the response to ani-of the following during Aiumal Services normal business hours (l) Pick up and impoundment of unlimited nunibeis of stray confined,domestic animals (2) Pack tap and disposal of unlunited nuinbers of dead domestic animals from roadways,parks,and tither public areas. (3) Pick up and transfer to shelter of ottmed animals for surrender or euthanasia (4) Pick up of dead owned animals for disposal iv) Provide for the necessary medical treatment and emergency care for domestic animals picked up by Animal Services Personnel and for those domestic animals presented directlw to veterinarians by private citizens and einergency response personnel. v) Provide for the receipt,processing and investigation of animal bite reports as well as the subsequent giuirantuie of animals in accordance with state codes pertaining to rabies control. vil, Receive and respond to reports of animals domestic or wild *which are suspected to be rabid or to have been exposed to rabies infection and attempt to affect their capture Captured animals will be processed in accordance with state codes pertaining to rabies control. vii)Receive and process all applications related to the keeping and sale of household pets inspect and regulate permitted operations in accordance with Racal and state codes. vuO Provide for the recording,investigation,administrative hearings,acid issuance of findings and orders related to aiuinal mirsaiaces.aniriral seizures or confiscations,and dangerous or vicious animals_Nuisances winch remain unresolved following the issuance of an abatement order will be processed to court through the Cih,Attomey s office irk Assist in the preparation and filing of court documents related to the civil anchor criminal prosecution of cases involving violation of municipal codes pertaining to the care,treatment.and keeping of domestic animals. x) Provide for the preparation,filing and civil or criminal prosecution of cases involving violations of California state codes pertaining to the care,treatment_and keeping of domestic animals_ c) eportPng Provide to the Cite quarterly service activity and financial reports reflecting field services_licensing. shelter operations,and huniane education programs-Reports will detail this infom-cation for both the individual quarter and year-to-date_ Exhibit A.Nage 2 of_i 84 Attachment 2 2) Cily Obligation,-The City shall perform the following duties. a) Ordinance Conjorpnitv Adopt,either by direct incorporation in the n-mincipal code or by way,of reference.aninial control ordinances which are in conformity,to and are not in substantial conflict or in variation from Chapter 9 of the Sail Luis Obispo County Code. b) P-osecufton qfAlknicipa, Cade Violations Throu gh the City Attorney provide for the preparation,filing and civil or criminal prosecution of cases involving violation of municipal codes pertaining to the care,treatment and keeping of animals,including all such codes incorporated into the municipal code by way of reference. c) Assistance. Provide such assistance and support to Anu-nal Services personnel as may be reasonably necessary to safely and effectively execute the operations required by this contract within the&tv limits. 3) Animal Care and Control Coordination Group.The County and City agree to meet and confer penodicaRv along with other parties contracting for like services,during the term of this Contract-Specifically the Animal Services Manager will coorduatr at least one meeting each January I,-lay and September to.review and discuss current 155Ues as they relate to the fiscal and practical application of this contract.Additional meetings may be held from time to time as becomes necessary **AW Exhibit A,Page 3 of 3 I%W 85 Attachment 2 CONTRACT FOR X-N-ENLAI. CARE AND CO"-N'TROL SERVICES EXHIBIT B COMPENSATION 1) first year Base service Fee:The City agrees to pay to the County,the amount of S239,231 for services provided under this Conti-act during the first year of service- Annual Service Fee Adiustment:After the first year ofservice under this Contract and in the event that a City Service Fee Determination has not been conducted pursuant to paragraph 4 of this exhibit within the preceding twelve N 2)months.then an annual adjustment for inflation will be.made to the City Service Fee Inflationary adjustments will.be calculated by the count;;no later than May l'of each year and will become effective on July I"of that year The inflationai-v adjustment factor will be determined by calculating the percentage increase of the.Consunier Price Index(CPI)during the preceding calendar year-With regard to its application to the terms of this Contract the Consumer Price Index(CPI).refers to the Consinner Price Index-for Urban TMge Eamers andCle?!ral Morkers,Loslngeies- Ri ide-Oran Ver" g7v Sransrin,71.4rra as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics In the event there is a decrease m the CPI during the preceduig calendar year service fees will remain,unchanged. 3) Implementation of modified fees Prior to the annual adjustment in the City service fee of in the event of a neiv City service fee determination-rites,shall be adjusted follownig notification from the Health Agency',.-Director to City N'o fiwdier action by either party is necessary to implement said rates. 4) CM!Service Fee Determination.There shall be regular,periodic reviews of service fee assessed to the City at the following tunes or minder the following circumstances a) Senlee Fee Detennhirrion for Subbsequen, Conn-acts.A service fee determination will be completed by County 60 days prior to the termination of the contract for the purpose of setting service fees for the subsequent contract tenni. U) --Innuai Rei ieit at Option of Count .),or Other Contracting Parties The Countv City, or any other party contracting with the County for lik-eservices during the term of this contract shall have the nJyiT to require a service fee determination be performed on the upcoming fiscal year s service fees by serving a written request for a rate review on the other contracting parties prior to Nlav 1"of the preceding fiscal year The rate determination will be completed bv tile County prior to June 30 and new City service fees shall go into effect beginning July 1"of the following fiscal rear. Exhibit B,Page I of 2 86 Attachment 2 S) Cate Fee Determination Methodology The County shall use a service based methodology=for determining city service fees_The service based methodology shall be based on four key facets of Animal Services operations. • Field Service • Licensing • Shelter Operations. + Education Services. a.) Determination o„f'Cost of Service—The cost of providing services to the City will be calculated by determining the average percentage of service allocated to the City over the preceding three years for each of the four facets of operations and multiplying this percentage against Animal Services operational cost for each facet_Combined,this then represents the City's total service cost in proportion to the County andall other contracting parties_ b) Ovd'it for Fees—The average annual revenue generated from fees or fines assessed directly to residents of the City by Animal Services over the preceding three years will be applied against the City s total service cost. c) Determination of Service Fee The fee assessed to the City for provision of services outlined in this contract shall be determined by subtracting the average revenue as determined by item 6b of this exhibit from the average cost of service as determined by item 6a of this exhibit. 6) Billing—County shall bill City for contracted services in quarterly increments.City shall remit payment to the County within thirty(3€)days of receipt of billing_ Exhibit B Page 2 of 2 `fur' 87 Attachment 2 CONTIUCT FOR N-LUL CARE AND C O.N-TROL SERV'IC'ES EXHIBIT C DUKXTION 1) Effective Date.This contract shall be effective July 1 2010 of fifteen(15)days following,of the date of the signature of the Count- whiclievef is later The County shall be the last to sign this contract. 2) Duration--The teen of this Contract shall expire June 30 2013'anless tenuniated sooner as provided in Exhibit D Exhibit C page Page I of I 88 Attachment 2 *OW CONTFUCT FOR ANINLkL CARE AND CONTROL SERVICES EXHIBIT D GENETLAL CONDITION'S 1) Termination Either party may terunuate this contract at any time b-, y giving the otlnei par ty thirty(30)days written notice of termination-Tennination for convenience shall have no effect upon the rights and obligations of the parties ansuig out of anv service-5 provided occurring prior to the effective date of such termination.Countvs-all be paid for all work satisfactorily completed prior to the effective date of termination. in the event that the contract is terininated prior to the conclusion of a quarterly billing cycle the City shall remit to the County a prorated amount based upon the number of days of service relative to the total number of days in the billing cycle. 2) Indeminfication.Nothing in the provisions of this Contract is intended to create duties or obligations to,or rights in third parties not party to this contract.or affect the legal liability of either party to contract.by imposing any standard of care respecting the regulation and enforcement of laws regarditiq animals different from the standard of care imposed by law It is understood and agreed that neither C itv nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by the County under or in connection with any work-,authority or jurisdiction delegated to the County under this Contract.It is also understood and agreed that pursuant to Government Code 89's 4,County shall defend,indemn& and swre harinless the City all officers-,and employees from all claims,suits or actions of every name.kind,and description brought forth or on account of injuries or death of any person or daniage to property resulting from anything done or onutted to be done by the County under flus Contract except as otherwise provided by Statute. It is understood and agreed that neither County nor anv officer or employee thereof.is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by the City tender or in connection with any work,authority orjunsdiction delegated to the City under this Contract.It is also understood and agreed that pursuant to Government Code Section 89S 4 the City shall defend,indemnify and save harmless the County all officers and employees from all claims,suits or actions of every narne,kind and description brought fourth on account of ukluries or death of any person or damage to property resulting from anything done or omitted to be done by City under connection with any work,authority or jurisdiction delegated to the City under this Agreement except as otherwise provided by Statute 3) Notices:.4aiv notice payment.statement.or demand required or permitted to be.given hereunder by either party to the other shall be effected b),personal delivery in writing or by mail.postage prepaid,Mailed notices shall be addressed to the parties at the addresses Exhibit D Page 1 of 3 89 Attachment 2 appearing below but each party may change its address byv.,ritten notice in accordance with tills section.Mailed notices shall be deemed communicated as of three days after mailing. Notices for Comity shall be addressed to Eric Anderson Aninial.Services Manager PO Box 1760 San Luis Obispo California 93406 Notices for Contractor shall be addressed to Jim Mulliall,Chief of Police Citv of Atascadero 5;05 El Cammo Real Alascaderc, CA 93422 4) Status of the,Parties'Officers,'Ernployee&Agents. Neither parrVs,officers,employees., agents,partners.other contractors or subcontractors shall be deemed to be employees of the other party at any time Nothing ill this contract shall be construed as creating a civil senrice employer-employee relationship or a joint venture relationship No officer employee,agent, partner,other contractor or subcontractor of the other party shall be eligible for membership in or any benefits from any plan for hospital-surgical.,or medical insurance or for memberstup in any retirement program,paid vacation,paid sick leave,other leave,with or without pay collective bargaining rights,grievance procedures_appeals to he Civil Selz ire proce s� a t Commission or any other benefits which inures to or accities to an cliployee,of the other parry The only perforniance and rights due the other p-.0y are those specifically stated ui this contract. i) Governing Law and enue. This Contract shall be governed by and construed ui accordance with the laws of the State of California.Additionally this contract has been formed and shall be performed m Sail Luis Obispo County-the venue for any legal action on the contract shall be in San Luis Obispo Comiry 6) Entire Agreement This Contract embodies the complete agreement of the parties hereto, superseding all oral or written previous and contemporary agreenients,between the parties relating to matters herein,and except as othem-isie provided herein.cannot be modified without the Prior written agreement of the parties. 7) Severability- In case ariv one or more of the provisions contained in this Contract shall for any reason be field to be invalid,illegal,or unenforceable in any respect.such mvanditv illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision thereof and this Contract shall be considered as if such invalid,illegal.or unenforceable pro-vision had never been contained ni this Contract. 8) Successors and Assigns. Tills Contract shall be buiding upon and insure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs.executors,administrators.successors and-except as otherwise provided in this Contract,their assigns. Exhibit D Page 2 of 3 90 Attachment 2 9) Captions. The captions to the -annus clauses of this Contract are,for information purposes only and shall riot alter the substance of the terms and conditions of this Contract. 10)Authorization. Each of the parties represents and warm,at&to the other that this Contract has been duly authorized bv all ilecessary corporate or govern cental action on the pan of the representing parriland that tins Contract is fully bindnig on such part' Exhibit.D Page 3 of 3 91 ITEM NUMBER. A-8 DATE 09/14/10 1918 1979 Atascadero City Council Staff Report- Public Works Department Transit Bus Purchase RECOMMENDATION Council authorize Staff to proceed with the purchase of a 30-passenger transit bus through the CalACT/MBTA Purchasing Cooperative from Creative Bus Sales for $101,17091 DISCUSSION Background. At the City Council meeting of May 12, 2009, Council approved the purchase of two transit vehicles through the State of California Department of General Services procurement program The first of the two vehicles was purchased and received, however Caltrans cancelled the statewide Paratransit Bus contract and is no longer offering this procurement option The California Association for Coordinated Transportation (CaIACT) and the Morongo Basin Transit Authority (MBTA) formed a Vehicle and Materials Purchasing Cooperative for the procurement of transit vehicles and transit shelters The procurement and award procedures were approved by the State of California Department of Transportation Division of Mass Transportation as meeting all Federal Transit Administration requirements for third party contracts Staff is proposing to purchase one 30-passenger transit bus for the fixed route transit system This vehicle replaces a high mileage vehicle In addition, the bus is a larger capacity vehicle than the type currently in use and will alleviate a capacity problem the system is currently experiencing FISCAL IMPACT The purchase price for the 30-passenger transit bus is $101,170 91 Funds in the amount of $117,000 for the purchase of this vehicle have been made available through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and have been programmed through the NAW San Luis Obispo Council of Governments 93 ITEM NUMBER. A-9 DATE 09/14/10 p ■l 0 ■ 1918 797-9 � 1979 4440* h A tascadero City Council Staff Report- Public Works Department Urban Greening Grant Application Approval RECOMMENDATION Council adopt the Draft Resolution approving the application for grant funds for the Urban Greening Grant Program under the Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006 (PROPOSITION 84 ) DISCUSSION City staff has applied for an Urban Greening Grant (Proposition 84) for parking lot improvements at the Charles Paddock Zoo The Grant does not require matching funds and will be used to construct new parking facilities in the undeveloped dirt parking area The project is proposed to include green features such as pervious paving, bio- swales and other low impact design features to provide parking while minimizing impacts to Atascadero Creek. Attached is a draft resolution authorizing the submittal of the project and the City Manager, or his designee, to execute ail manner of documents and agreements with the State of California The authorizing resolution must be submitted to the State prior to award of any grant funding FISCAL IMPACT The adoption of this Resolution will allow future authorizations and/or funding reimbursements to be received by the City on the Charles Paddock Zoo Parking Lot Project. ATTACHMENT Draft Resolution 95 ITEM NUMBER. A-9 DATE 09/14/10 DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE URBAN GREENING GRANT PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE DRINKING WATER, WATER QUALITY AND SUPPLY, FLOOD CONTROL, RIVER AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2006 (PROPOSITION 84) WHEREAS, the Legislature and Governor of the State of California have provided funds for the program shown above, and, WHEREAS, the Strategic Growth Council has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of this grant program, establishing necessary procedures, and, WHEREAS, said procedures established by the Strategic Growth Council require a resolution certifying the approval of application(s) by the Applicants governing board before submission of said application(s)to the State; and, WHEREAS, the applicant, if selected, will enter into an agreement with the State of California to carry out the Project. WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero wishes to delegate authorization to execute these agreements, certifications and any amendments thereto to the City Manager or his designee NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero 1 Approves the filing of an application for the Charles Paddock Zoo Green Parking Lot; and, 2 Certifies that applicant understands the assurances and certification in the application, and, 3 Certifies that applicant or title holder will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project consistent with the land tenure requirements, or will secure the resources to do so, and, 4 Certifies that it will comply with the provisions of Section 1771 8 of the State Labor Code regarding payment of prevailing wages on Projects awarded Proposition 50 Funds, and, 5 If applicable, certifies that the project will comply with any laws and regulations including, but not limited to, legal requirements for building codes, health and safety 14110 96 ITEM NUMBER. A-9 DATE. 09/14/10 codes, disabled access laws, environmental laws and, that prior to commencement of construction, all applicable permits will have been obtained, and, 6 Certifies that applicant will work towards the Governor's State Planning Priorities intended to promote equity, strengthen the economy, protect the environment, and promote public health and safety as included in Government Code Section 65041 1, and, 7 Appoints the City Manager, or designee, as agent to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to applications, agreements, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project(s) PASSED AND ADOPTED at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Atascadero held on the 14th of September, 2010 CITY OF ATASCADERO Roberta Fonzi, Mayor ATTEST Marcia McClure Torgerson,C.M.0 , City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney 97 ITEM NUMBER. C-1 DATE. 09/14/10 n r 1918 1979 Atascadero City Council Staff Report— Community Development Department Final Draft of Baseline Greenhouse Gas Inventory Community-Wide and Government Operations 2005 RECOMMENDATION Council review and accept baseline greenhouse gas inventory report. REPORT-IN-BRIEF '%` The final draft of the baseline greenhouse gas inventory has been completed and is being presented for City Council and public review This report identifies baseline emissions for the year 2005, and will be used to assist the City in identifying opportunities for future emissions reductions DISCUSSION Background. Assembly Bill 32 was adopted by the California State Assembly in 2006 to combat global warming and reduce GHG emissions AB 32 establishes a State goal of reducing GHG emissions within California to 1990 levels by the year 2020, which is approximately a 30% reduction from "business-as-usual" emissions levels projected for 2020 The first step in reducing emissions and initiating compliance with AB 32 is to create a baseline inventory of our current emissions levels In March 2009, City Council adopted a resolution to join ICLEI (Local Governments for Sustainability) and accepted a grant from the San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District (SLO APCD) to conduct a greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory Over the last year, the SLO APCD's consultant, PMC, has worked with City staff to compile all of the City's data into a final report which identifies both community—wide and government operations emissions for the baseline year of 2005 99 ITEM NUMBER. C-1 DATE 09/14/10 Analysis. The City of Atascadero's GHG emissions inventory is split into two sections , community-wide and municipal government operations The community-wide inventory is a broad look at total emissions produced by all activities within city boundaries Community—wide emissions are included in the inventory because cities can create policies and programs which they can use to help influence development and activities within their jurisdictions Municipal emissions are a subset of the larger community-wide emissions inventory This part of the inventory analyzes emissions which are produced through the City government operations For the City of Atascadero, municipal operations create about 2 3% of the total emissions within the City boundaries Although this is only a small portion of total emissions, local government emissions reporting is important in order to establish the City as a climate leader in the community In this way, the City can lead by example in energy efficiency and climate-friendly operations This GHG Inventory report found that the overall community produced 176,234 metric tons of CO2e in the base year 2005, and City government operations produced 4,128 metric tons of CO2e, or 2 3% of the total emissions within City boundaries City contribution to community emissions Municipal 2.3% j Communit r u Wide 977% Community-wide Emissions Summary The GHG Inventory identified transportation as the largest portion of community-wide emissions within the City of Atascadero, making up 61 4% of total emissions The majority of these emissions (56 4%) come from travel on local roads, while about 43 6% of transportation emissions come from highway travel The City likely does not have jurisdictional control to reduce emissions from the highway transportation sector, 100 ITEM NUMBER. C-1 DATE 09/14/10 however, ICLEI and State protocol require that these emissions be accounted for in local inventories This keeps information consistent throughout the State and avoids double-counting of emissions The next largest contributor to community-wide emissions (33 3%) is the built environment, consisting of residential, commercial, and industrial natural gas and electricity consumption for buildings The residential sector contributes 66% to the built environment emissions within the City of Atascadero Commercial and industrial buildings make up the other 34% Solid waste in landfills is responsible for 5 2% of community-wide emissions Most of the waste emissions come from the disposal of paper products (55 8%), the rest coming from food waste, plant debris, and wood/textiles Community-wide emissions by sector Waste 5.2% �F• z Other 0.1% �w Residential 22.0% Transportation 61.4% "s 1 , 3 Gommercial1 Z •f Industrial 11.3% 101 ITEM NUMBER. C-1 DATE 09/14/10 Municipal Operations Emissions Summary 1410* The GHG Inventory found that the largest contributor to City government emissions is the City's wastewater treatment plant, making up 70 7% of the emissions produced by the municipal operations Electricity consumption from the wastewater facilities makes up only 9% of the total emissions attributable to wastewater The majority of the emissions produced by the wastewater treatment facility (91%) are methane, a greenhouse gas which is produced from solid waste decomposition as a result of the open lagoon system which the City uses for treatment. This lagoon type system is inexpensive to operate, however, since these are uncovered lagoons, a large amount of greenhouse gas is emitted into the atmosphere No other local cities operate this type of treatment facility themselves, so the results for the City of Atascadero's GHG inventory are different than those of the other cities in the area Municipal Operations emissions by sector Transit Fleet Vehicle Fleet 5.2% Streetilghts 9.7% Employee &Traffic Buildings Commute Signals &Facilities ` 4.5% X1.0% 7 7% ,�` Water Solld Waste , ;- Dehvery 1.2% 0.02% 1"001 k3 3 y 717 Wastewater, Facilities 70.7% 102 ITEM NUMBER. C-1 DATE 09/14/10 While the wastewater treatment plant is a major contributor to the government `%W operations emissions, it is important not to overlook other sectors and sources In order to clearly see other opportunities for reductions within government operations, PMC has provided a chart which analyzes the remaining municipal emissions with the wastewater treatment facility taken out of the equation Municipal operations GHG emissions by sector *with wastewater treatment plant removed Solid Waste 4.1% r E s � Water Delivery 0.1% Streetlights&Trafficx Signals 3.3% f x:s i; a3 t". 110W Of the remaining emissions contributed, after removing the wastewater treatment plant from the equation, the data shows that the City's vehicle and transit fleet make up about 51% of the remaining emissions Transit includes the City buses, and the vehicle fleet includes City cars and trucks operated by the Fire, Police, Community Services, Community Development, Public Works, and other City departments The City employee commute is calculated separately, contributing 15 3% of the government emissions The other main contributors to municipal emissions were government buildings and facilities, making up 26 2% of the remaining municipal emissions The source of these emissions includes energy consumption by facilities owned and operated by the municipality, excluding the wastewater treatment plant. The facilities included in this analysis consist of City Hall, fire and police stations, recreation facilities, the Charles Paddock Zoo, parks, and other City facilities 103 ITEM NUMBER. C-1 DATE 09/14/10 Next steps This GHG Inventory report will serve as a baseline to measure future emission levels against, and will assist the City in determining areas of greatest opportunity to reduce current emissions The figure below illustrates the business as usual forecast, as well as where the City needs to be in 2020 in order to comply with AB 32 GHG Forecast in Relation to Reduction Targets 250,000 Business-as- �°°' usual forecast Actual 227 647 metric Reduction 225,000 tons CO2e by =77,848 2020 242,428 metric metric tons tons Ca-ze by 2025 (44.2%)by 200,000 2020; 2005 baseline 111,720 levels metric 17£,234 metric tons 175,000 toms CO`e (63.4%) by 15%Below 2005 2025 baseline levels= below 149 799 metric 154,OOQ tons COze by business- 2020 pursuing as-usual 0reduction by 2 2055 0=35,247 125,000 metric tons CO�e 2005 2020 2025 The completed emissions inventory will gives the City baseline emissions data in order to create a future Climate Action Plan (CAP) to plan out how to reduce emissions Currently, the Cities of Paso Robles, Arroyo Grande, Grover Beach, Morro Bay, Pismo Beach, and the City of Atascadero have agreed to take part in a joint Sustainable Planning and Incentives Program Grant application to acquire funds for the creation of individual CAP's tailored each city PMC has been contracted by the SLO APCD to write the grant application for the Small Cities of SLO County Climate Action Plan Grant. The application for the grant was recently submitted for the August 31, 2010 deadline If the grant is awarded for the SLO County Climate Action Plan Grant, PMC and the six cities involved would begin working on the CAP as soon as February of 2011 Staff will provide the Council with an update on the CAP timeline once grant applications are reviewed and awarded Conclusion. The final draft of the baseline greenhouse gas inventory has been completed and is being presented for City Council and public review The report identifies the major sources of City emissions, including transportation, buildings, and waste, and therefore will be able to focus on the greatest opportunities for emissions reductions with the future Climate Action Plan 104 ITEM NUMBER. C-1 DATE 09/14/10 FISCAL IMPACT No current fiscal impact; report completed by grant through APCD ALTERNATIVES The Council may choose to send the greenhouse gas inventory report back to staff and the consultant for additional analysis or clarification ATTACHMENT Final GHG Inventory Report Prepared by PMC April 2010 105 **Aw CITY OF ATASCADERO Community-Wide and Government Operations 2005 Baseline Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Prepared for- 01d, AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT wolla"` SAN LUIS OBISPO AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO Prepared by, 860 WALNUT STREET, SUITE B SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-2725 April 2010 107 BASELINE EMISSIONS INVENTORY Credits and Acknowledgements Report prepared by PMC for the San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District on behalf of the City of Atascadero PMC PROJECT TEAM Tammy Seale Project Manager Jaime Hill Associate Planner Jillian Rich, Associate Planner Scott Kaiser Assistant Planner WITH ASSISTANCE FROM: Air Pollution Control District Atascadero Waste Alternatives Larry Allen, Air Pollution Control Officer Mike La Barbara, Municipal Marketing Aeron Arlin Genet, Planning and Outreach Pacific Waste Services, Inc. Manager Melissa Guise, Air Quality Specialist Jim Wyse President Dean Carlson Air Quality Engineer PG&E City of Atascadero John Bohman, Green Communities and Warren Frace, Director, Community Innovator Pilots Development Southern California Gas Company Callie Taylor, Associate Planner, Colby Morrow, Environmental Affairs Community Development Program Manager Customer Programs Geoff English, Deputy Director Public /CLE/—Local Governments for Works Department Rachelle Rickard, Director Administrative Sustainability Services Jonathan Strunin, Program Officer Justin Black, Public Works, Chief Plant Allison Culpen Program Associate Operator Lori Brickley, Finance Tech California Air Resources Board Amanda Muether, Dispatch Tom Scheffelin Analyst, Transportation Analysis Section County of San Luis Obispo Jon Taylor P E. Manager Transportation Janice Campbell Agriculture Department Analysis Section IWMA Peter Cron, Analyst ,%W City of Atascadero 109 BASELINE 1 EMISSIONS INVENTORY Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 1 Introduction 7 1 1 Purpose of a GHG Inventory 7 1.2 Climate Change—Legislative Background 9 1 3 The Cities for Climate Protection Campaign 12 14 Local Sustainability and Climate Change Mitigation Activities 13 2 Community and Government Operations Inventory Methodology 15 21 Baseline and Forecast Years 15 2.2 The Two Inventories Community-wide and City Government Operations 15 2.3 Data Collection and Methodology 17 2.4 Data Sources 18 2.5 Data Limitations .20 2.6 Clean Air and Climate Protection Software 2009 .22 3 Community GHG Inventory Results .24 31 Community-Wide Emissions by Scope 24 3.2 All Scope Emissions by Sector 26 33 Transportation .27 34 The Built Environment(Residential, Commercial Industrial) 29 35 Waste 31 36 Other—Off-road Agricultural Equipment 32 37 Community Emissions by Source 33 38 Per Capita Emissions 35 4 City Government Operations GHG Emissions Inventory Results 36 41 City Government Operations Inventory Results 36 4.2 Building Sector 37 43 Vehicle and Transit Fleet 38 44 Employee Commute 39 45 Streetlights and Traffic Signals 41 46 Water and Sewage 41 47 Waste 43 48 Other—Miscellaneous Equipment 43 49 City Emissions by Source 43 5 Forecast 46 6 Conclusion and Next Steps 48 Aftw City of Atascadero '.•- COMMUNITY-WIDE GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS List of Figures Figure ES-1 Community GHG Emissions by Sector 2 Figure ES-3 City Government Portion of Community-Wide GHG Emissions 3 Figure ES-2 City Government Operations GHG Emissions by Sector 3 Figure ES-4 2020 and 2025 City of Atascadero Business-as-usual GHG Emissions Forecast 5 Figure ES-5 Business-as-usual Forecast in Relation to State-Recommended Reduction Targets 6 Figure 1-1 The Greenhouse Gas Effect 7 Figure 1-2. California Climate Change Emissions and Targets 10 Figure 1-3 The ICLEI Five-Milestone Process 12 Figure 2-1 The Relationship Between Community-wide and City Government Inventories 16 Figure 2-2. GHG Emissions Scopes. 18 Figure 3-1 2005 Community GHG Emissions by Scope .25 Figure 3-2• 2005 Community GHG Emissions by Sector .26 Figure 3-3 Community GHG Emissions by Fuel Source .27 Figure 3-4 Built Environment GHG Emissions by Sector .29 Figure 3-5 Built Environment GHG Emissions by Source .29 Figure 3-6 Residential GHG Emissions by Source 30 Figure 3-7 Commercial/ Industrial GHG Emissions by Source 30 Figure 3-8 Waste GHG Emissions by Type 32 Figure 3-9- Community GHG Emissions by Source 34 Figure 4-2. City Government Operations GHG Emissions by Sector 36 Figure 4-1 City Government Operations Contribution to Community-Wide GHG Emissions36 Figure 4-3 Building GHG Emissions by Source 37 Figure 4-4 Vehicle Fleet Fuel Consumption per Year by Type 39 Figure 4-5 GHG Emissions from Wastewater Treatment Plant 42 Figure 4-6 City Government Operations GHG Emissions by Source 44 Figure 4-7 City Government Operations GHG Emissions by Sector with Wastewater Treatment Plant Removed 45 Figure 5-1 2020 and 2025 Business-as-usual Projected Growth in Community-wide GHG Emissions 46 Figure 6-1 GHG Forecast in Relation to Reduction Targets 49 •- City of Atascadero 112 BASELINE • EMISSIONS • List of Tables Table 2-1 Data Sources for Community Analysis, 2005 19 Table 2-2 Data Sources for City Government Operations Analysis, 2005 .20 Table 3-1 GHG Emissions Sources Included in 2005 Community Inventory by Scope and Sector .24 Table 3-2 Community GHG Emissions per Sector per Scope (Metric Tons of CO2e) .25 Table 3-3 Community GHG Emissions by Sector(Metric Tons of CO2e) .27 Table 3-4 Transportation GHG Emissions by Road Type .28 Table 3-5 Transportation GHG Emissions by Fuel Source .28 Table 3-6 Residential GHG Emissions by Source .30 Table 3-7 Commercial/Industrial GHG Emissions Sources 31 Table 3-8 Waste GHG Emissions by Waste Type 32 Table 3-9- Community GHG Emissions by Source 34 Table 4-1 2005 City Government Operations GHG Emissions by Sector 37 Table 4-2 Building Sector GHG Emissions by Source 2005 38 Table 4-3 Days of City Employee Travel by Commute Mode 40 Table 4-4 Employee Commute VMT by Vehicle and Fuel Type 41 Table 4-5 City Government Operations GHG Emissions by Source 44 Appendices Appendix A. CACP2009 Detailed Report for Community-Wide Emissions, 2005 Appendix B- CACP2009 Detailed Report for City Government Operations Emissions, 2005 Appendix C- Detailed Methodology for Community-Wide Inventory Appendix D- Detailed Methodology for City Government Operations Inventory Appendix E. City Employee Commute Survey, 2009 City ofAtascadero '-•- 113 BASELINE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY Executive Summary wbatare foHQ Climate change is quickly becoming o high phohh/ among po|icynnakeroond residents alike. In K8anoh 2009 the City Council made o commitment to evaluating Adanmadeoo'o contribution to oppir global climate change through the development ofaCommunity- Wide and City Government Operations Baseline Greenhouse Goa (GHG) Emissions Inventory (inventory) This Inventory identifies the major sources of greenhouse gas emissions within the city' and provides m baseline against which future progress can be nnaaounad This Inventory includes two components (1) o community-wide analysis and (2) oCity government operations analysis it is important to nota that the Qty government operations inventory is a subset of the community inxontory, olloodyely, WOOL meaning that all City government operations emissions are included in the oonnnnencia|/induotria|, tnanoportotion, vvomte. or P. "other" categories of the community-wide inventory The City government operations inventory should not be added to the oonnnnunih/ona|ynia, rather it should be looked at as o slice of the complete picture. Specifically, this Inventory does the following pq * Calculates GHGo �onn community-wide activities, bn including City government openadono, within the City's jurisdictional boundary incalendar year 2OO5 M. * |denti�eathe rn joraouroeoofQraanhouaegao �nniooione from community-wide sources and City Qoxarnnnard operations, ° Provides City decision-makers and the community with adequate information to inform policy decisions, and * Forecasts how emissions will grow in the community if no behavioral changes are made. � In this report, the tonn city' nah*no to the area inside the jurisdictional boundary of the City of Absauadeno whereas 'City government" refers to those activities which are under the operational control ofCity agencies. c 'Community-wide or community" refers to all activities within the city (as defined above) including those from businesses, industrial processes, residents vehicles and City government operations. City of Atascader7o 115 COMMUNITY-WIDE GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS The 2005 community-wide and City government operations baseline GHG Inventory represents a key step in the City of Atascadero s efforts to improve air quality enhance sustainability and ensure the safety and comfort of its residents for generations to come. In addition, this Inventory allows the City to quantitatively track and take credit for its numerous efforts related to energy efficiency and the mitigation of global climate change. COMMUNITY-WIDE GHG INVENTORY RESULTS The community of Atascadero emitted approximately 176 234 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent(CO2e) in the baseline year 2005 As shown in Figure ES-1 the transportation sector was by far the largest contributor to emissions (61 4%) producing approximately 108,223 metric tons of CO2e in 2005 Emissions from the residential sector were the next largest contributor (22%) producing approximatelyCOMMUNITY 38 803 metric tons of CO2e. The commercial EMISSIONS BYSECTOR and industrial sectors accounted for a combined 11 3% of the total. Emissions from solid waste —Waste 5.2% comprised 5.2% of the total and emissions from y / —Othero.1% other sources such as agricultural equipment � comprised 0 1% u Residential Transportation 22.0% The majority of emissions from the 61.40A transportation sector were the result of gasoline M consumption in private vehicles traveling on local roads, US 101, and state highways GHG figures from the waste sector are the estimated ,k ..:. Commercial/ future emissions that will result from the Industrial 11.3% decomposition of waste generated by city residents and businesses in the base year 2005, with a weighted average methane capture factor of 60 0% 3 3 In 2005 the San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District reported methane capture rates for the Chicago Grade and Cold Canyon landfills. The methane recovery factors of the landfills are based on the system operations at that time. Atascadero 116 BASELINE GREENHOUSE EMISSIONS • - CITY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS GHG INVENTORY RESULTS City government operations and facilities produced approximately 4128 metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions in 2005 As displayed in Figure ES-2, this represents approximately 2 3% of total community-wide emissions in the city City government emissions result from waste, energy consumption from water and wastewater facilities, buildings streetlights and other facilities, fuel consumption by the vehicle and transit fleet and employee commutes and miscellaneous equipment. The largest contributor to the City's emissions (70 7%), was from the wastewater facilities producing 2,920 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent. The vehicle fleet was the second largest contributor to the City's emissions (9 7%) producing 402 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent(refer to Figure ES-3) GOVERNMENTFIGURE ES-2: CITY GOVERNMENT• • • NS BY PORTION OF • SECTOR • Transit Fleet Vehicle Fleet_ 5.2% 1; Streetlights 9.7% �' �l Employee &Traffic Municipal Buildings Commuto Signals &Fsc(Ikles�„� i 4.5% -1• 2.3% 7.7% .�.�=;6 f Water Solid Waste__.. _Delivery t yza Communit -�- Wide Wastewater Facilities g7 7% 70.7% City government operations emissions are a subset of the total community-wide emissions as outlined above. However, similar to the way in which businesses and factories perform their own facility-scale GHG Inventories this Inventory analyzes City emissions separately to identify cost- saving and emissions-reducing strategies in the future The methodology for estimating emissions from local government operations is guided specifically by the Local Government Greenhouse Gas Inventory Protocol developed by the California Air Resources Board ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability and the California Climate Registry r1n►r City of Atascadero `.•- 117 COMMUNITY-WIDE AND GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS 2005 . NIS DATA LIMITATIONS This Community-Wide and City Government Operations Baseline GHG Emissions Inventory captures the major sources of greenhouse gases caused by activities within the city per standard practice However it is important to note that some likely emission sources were not included in the Inventory either because of privacy laws, lack of data, or a lack of reasonable methodology for calculating emissions. It is estimated that the sources not included in the inventory comprise less than 5 0% of total emissions in the city It is likely that as greenhouse gas inventories become more common methodology and accessibility to data will improve The sources that could not be included due to privacy laws lack of data availability and/or a reasonable methodology include the following• • Refrigerants from City government operations facilities and vehicles; • Freight and passenger trains, • Propane, wind or solar energy consumed by the community-at-large, • Recreational off-road equipment and vehicles and • Residential septic tanks systems " These limitations are explained further in this document. FORECAST AND NEXT STEPS If consumption trends continue the pattern observed in 2005 emissions will reach 227 647 metric tons of COZe by 2020 or a 29.2% increase over 2005 baseline levels. By 2025 emissions will reach 242,428 metric tons of COze or a 37 6% increase over 2005 baseline levels. •- City of Atascadero 118 BASELINE GREENHOUSE EMISSIONS • fir►' FIGURE ES-4: 2020 AND 2025 CITY OF ATASCADERO EMISSIONS • - j 275,000 2.50,000 225,000 200,000 175 000 .._ ■Other 150,000 Wale 125,000 __ _...... ■Transportation 100,000 _..................... ■Commercial/Industrial Residential 75,000 50,000 _. _,... 25,000 T a ilr► aIn Axa- I 0 2005 2020 2025 With this information, the City can make an informed determination of a reduction target. Conformance with the State of California's recommended reduction of 15% below present levels by 2020 would result in a 44.2% reduction below the city's business-as-usual emissions. By 2025 the reduction would increase to 63 4% below business-as-usual (Figure ES-5) 4 4 AB 32 Scoping Plan, page 27 states that CARB encourages local governments to 'move toward establishing similar goals for community emissions that parallel the State commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 15 percent from current levels by 2020 http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scopingplan.htm City of Atascadero -..- 119 COMMUNITY–WIDE AND GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS 2005 FIGURE ES-5: BUSINESS-AS-USUAL FORECAST • • RECOMMENDEDr • 250,000 Business-as- Actual �r usual forecast 227,647 metric Reduction 225,000 tons CO2e by =77,848 2020;242,428 metric metric tons tons CO2e by 2025 (44.2%) by 200,000 2020; 2005 baseline 111,720 levels metric 176,234 metric 175,000 .....,,..tons CO2e tons (63.4°/x) by 15%Below 2005 2025 baseline levels= below 150,000 149,799 metric tons CO2e by business- 2020 pursuing as-usual 80%reduction by 125,000 2050=35,247 metric tons CO 2005 2020 2025 It is likely that the city's emissions are already below the business-as-usual forecast due to •n sustainability efforts initiated by the City since 2005 -•- City of Atascadero —01 120 BASELINE • EMISSIONS • � rrr' 1. Introduction In March 2009 the City Council adopted a resolution to join ` yQ. ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability (ICLEI) and to ;' ntergru� �f �'� authorize the preparation of a greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) baseline inventory In committing to the project, the City of ,1CLI -= ,y Atascadero embarked on an ongoing coordinated effort to y reduce the GHG emissions that cause global warming, to 3, improve air quality, and to reduce costs. This section introduces the Inventory, defines key terms usedMI throughout the Inventory, and provides an overview of climate pg �8t1t� �t7 change science and regulation in California. V, 1 1 PURPOSE OF A GHG INVENTORY This Inventory represents completion of the first step in the City's climate protection process. As advised by ICLEI, quantifying recent-year emissions is essential to establish (1) a baseline against which to measure future emission levels, and (2) an understanding of where the highest percentages of emissions are coming from, and, therefore, the greatest opportunities for emissions reductions. This Inventory presents estimates of greenhouse gas emissions in 2005 resulting from the community as a whole. Climate Change -Legislative FIGURE 1-1: Background Scientific consensus holds that the world's GREENHOUSETHE population is releasing greenhouse gases faster than the earth s natural systems can absorb them. These gases are released as byproducts of fossil fuel combustion waste disposal energy use land-use changes, and other human activities. This release of gases, such as carbon dioxide (CO2) methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N20) creates a blanket around the earth that allows light to pass through but traps heat at the surface preventing its escape into space (Figure 1-1) Known as the greenhouse Source:Tufts University effect, models show that this phenomenon could lead to a 2'F to 10°F temperature City of Atascadero 121 COMMUNITY-WIDE AND GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS 2005 increase over the next 100 years. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warns that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities.5 Although used interchangeably there is a difference between the terms "climate change" and "global warming According to the State, climate change refers to any long-term change in average climate conditions in a place or region, whether due to natural causes or as a result of human activities.6 The use of the term "climate change is becoming more prevalent because it encompasses all changes to the climate, not just temperature. Additionally, the term "climate change" conveys temporality, implying that climate change can be slowed with the efforts of local, regional, state national and world entities Changes in the earth's temperature will have impacts for residents and businesses in the City of Atascadero. Some of the major impacts to the Central Coast expected to occur include the following separated by sector 78 • Coastline. The San Luis Obispo County coastline could face inundation as a result of sea level rise and global warming As temperatures rise, the ocean waters rise as well due to thermal expansion and the melting of glaciers and snowpack. The state's 2009 Climate Change Impacts Assessment (the 2009 Scenarios Project) estimates that sea levels will rise by 12 to 18 inches by 2050 and 21 to 55 inches by 2100 This level of sea rise has the potential to negatively affect groundwater salination as well as the size and attractiveness of local beaches, which could affect property values and the tourism industry in the county; • Reduced Water Supply The 2009 Scenarios Project estimates a decrease in precipitation of 12 -35% by 2050 Higher temperatures are also expected to increase evaporation and make for a generally drier climate In addition more precipitation will fall as rain rather than snow, which will cause snow to melt earlier in the year and not in the warmer drier months when water is in higher demand, 5 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report, Working Group 1 2007 Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis, Summary for Policy Makers. 6 California Natural Resources Agency 2009 California Climate Adaptation Strategy Discussion Draft. August 2009 7 California Climate Change Center Our Changing Climate. Assessing the Risks to California (2006) www climatechange.ca.gov 8 Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Proposed CEQA Guideline Amendments for Greenhouse Gas Emissions.April 2009 •..- • City of Atascadero 122 BASELINE GREENHOUSE EMISSIONS • • Agriculture Climate change could cause a shift in the type and location of agriculture in the area. As saltwater intrudes into coastal aquifers and groundwater resources decrease it is possible that some crops will be forced out of the area, which affects the local economy and food supply Water supplies to agriculture may be 20 -23% below demand targets between 2020 and 2050; • Public Health Climate change could potentially threaten the health of residents of Atascadero Heat waves are expected to have a major impact on public health as will decreasing air quality and an increase in mosquito breeding and mosquito-borne diseases. There is also expected to be an increase in allergenic plant pollen and an increase in the frequency of wildfires. The elderly, young and other vulnerable populations will need assistance as they will not have the resources to deal with the costs and adapt to the expected changes. Although one city cannot resolve the issue of climate change, local governments can make a positive impact through cumulative local action. Cities and counties have the ability to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through effective land use and transportation planning, wise waste management, and the efficient use of energy The City can achieve multiple benefits including lower energy bills improved air quality economic development, reduced emissions, and better quality of life through err►' • Energy efficiency in City facilities and vehicle fleet; • Sustainable purchasing and waste reduction efforts, • Land use and transportation planning and • Efficient management of water resources. This Inventory serves as a baseline measurement for implementing and tracking the effectiveness of these efforts 1.2 CLIMATE CHANGE— LEGISLATIVE BACKGROUND California continues to be a leader in addressing climate change in the United States and in the world In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger issued a landmark Executive Order establishing progressive greenhouse gas emissions targets for the entire state. Executive Order (EO) S-3-05 makes the following goals. • By 2010 reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 2000 levels, City of Atascadero 123 COMMUNITY-WIDE GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS 2005 • By 2020 reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels • By 2050 reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 80% below 1990 levels To support these reduction targets, the California legislature adopted the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 also known as Assembly Bill (AB) 32. The law requires the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to develop regulatory and market mechanisms that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 as shown in Figure 1-2 below To achieve this goal, CARB developed a set of early action measures in 2007 for priority implementation in 2010 These early action measures became part of the AB 32 implementation plan, or Scoping Plan, approved in December 2008. The Scoping Plan identifies a variety of GHG reduction activities including direct regulations, monetary and non-monetary incentives, voluntary actions market-based mechanisms such as a cap-and-trade and an implementation fee regulation to fund the program. The Scoping Plan also identifies local governments as essential partners" and calls for cities and counties to adopt GHG reduction targets consistent with AB 32. FIGURE 1-2: CALIFORNIA CLIMATE CHANGE EMISSIONS AND TARGETS 700 ........ ...................................._....._.................._..._........._._........._....� —174 MMTCO2E Reduction 600 N 500 1990 Emission Baseline h Cc 400 . LK, � • .}� 2Cr G W 4 � _ 300 u 1 �5 O_ U � 200 R 80%Reduction 341 MMTCOZE 4 100 lz ; 1.. 3 0 1990 2000 2010 2020 2050 Year ..- City of Atascadero 124 BASELINE • EMISSIONS • In support of the AB 32 reduction targets, California adopted Senate Bill (SB) 97 in August 2007 which formally acknowledges that climate change is an important environmental issue that requires analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) In response to SB 97, the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) submitted their proposed amendments to the CEQA Guidelines for greenhouse gas emissions in April 2009 These proposed amendments will provide guidance to public agencies regarding the analysis of mitigation and the effects of GHG emissions in CEQA documents. The Natural Resources Agency is required to certify and adopt the amendments before January 1, 2010 9 Although EO S-3-05 and SB 97 have made California a national leader in climate change policy there is much more to come The California legislature passed numerous bills in recent years concerning energy use, land use, transportation and other climate change topics. These bills will result in the guidance and funding necessary for local governments to move forward with climate action efforts. At the same time the State is working to form regional approaches to reducing greenhouse gas emissions in response to the passage of Senate Bill 375 SB 375 aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by linking transportation funding to land use planning It also requires Metropolitan Planning Organizations including the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments, to include a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) in their Regional Transportation Plans (RTPs) for reducing suburban sprawl. The bill also creates incentives for implementation of sustainable communities strategies and sustainable transportation plans Additional efforts are under way to affect the overall transportation sector by mandating fewer emissions from vehicles including Assembly Bill 1493, signed into law in 2002, which will require carmakers to reduce emissions from new passenger cars and light trucks beginning in 2009 US Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) approved the new emissions standards in June 2009 The State is also preparing for climate change resiliency in order to adapt to the inevitable effects of climate change. In November 2008 Governor Schwarzenegger signed Executive Order S-13-08 which asked the Natural Resources Agency to identify how state agencies can respond to rising temperature, changing precipitation patterns, sea level rise, and extreme natural events The order requires the Natural Resources Agency to develop a Climate Adaptation Strategy (CAS) to analyze climate change impacts to the state and recommend strategies to manage those threats. The Natural Resources Agency released a discussion draft of the CAS in August 2009 9 Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Proposed CEQA Guideline Amendments for Greenhouse Gas Emissions.April 2009 City of Atascadero '.•- 125 COMMUNITY-WIDE AND GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS 21 • The scale and pace at which the State of California is addressing this issue necessitates that local governments accelerate efforts to combat climate change 1.3 THE CITIES FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION CAMPAIGN By adopting a resolution to join ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability, the City of Atascadero is now part of an international movement of local governments. More than 1,000 local governments, including over 500 in the United States, have joined ICLEI s Cities for Climate Protection (CCP) campaign The CCP campaign provides a framework for local communities to identify and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, organized along five milestones as represented in Figure 1-3 below- FIGURE • PROCESS Leadership Commitment Milestone 1 I Inventory Emissions ` -.......... _ _ __�._..._._ ......_. ... Milestone 2 1 Establish Target Milestone 5 Milestone 3 Monitor/Evaluate Develop Climate ! Progress Action Plan Milestone 4 Implement Climate Action Plan G€srxr� rls This report represents the completion of the first CCP milestone, and provides a foundation for future work to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the City of Atascadero -..- City of Atascadero 126 BASELINE GREENHOUSE EMISSIONSINVENTORY 1.4 LOCAL SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION ACTIVITIES Many of the air pollution programs already in place throughout San Luis Obispo County reduce ozone forming pollutants and toxic emissions but they also have ancillary benefits and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The County, cities, and the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) implement rules and regulations, clean fuels programs, CEQA mitigation measures, grants, the Transportation Choices Program, pollution prevention activities, energy efficiency and conservation measures, water conservation programs, partnerships, and general public outreach that directly or indirectly address climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The APCD Board, approved the first report or plan to address climate change in the county The plan, (Options for Addressing Climate Change in San Luis Obispo County (2005)) identifies the following seven actions that could be implemented to specifically address greenhouse gases (GHG) at the local level: 1) Prepare a countywide inventory of greenhouse gas emissions, 2) Target a percentage of mitigation grant funds for greenhouse gas emission reductions, err 3) Evaluate and quantify the GHG reduction benefits from existing district programs; 4) Develop public education and outreach campaigns on climate change, 5) Encourage and provide support for local governments to join the Cities for Climate Protection program, 6) Develop partnership with Cal Poly for addressing climate change and 7) Join the California Climate Registry and encourage local industry participation As of November 2008 the APCD has initiated, promoted or supported all of the implementation actions to address climate change and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the county The APCD joined the California Climate Registry and conducted its greenhouse gas emissions inventory in the fall of 2008 The APCD facilitates regular meetings of Climate Change Stakeholders, a local group of city and county representatives that shares resources to address climate change To encourage and support local greenhouse gas emissions inventories the APCD is providing technical assistance to all of the incorporated cities to assist or perform GHG government operations and community-wide emissions inventories, similar to this Inventory, for all of the incorporated cities in San Luis Obispo County '%W City of Atascadero •-•- 127 COMMUNITY—WIDEAND GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS 2t t The APCD also coordinates the Central Coast Clean Cities Coalition (C5) C5 is a partnership of public/private entities whose goal is to promote the use of alternative fuels vehicles (AFV) on the Central Coast. By working with area fleet operators, C5 sponsors training seminars, public events, and grant funding workshops related to use of alternative fuels. The City of Atascadero has been pursuing energy efficiencies through such measures as. • Construction of new and improvement of existing bike lanes and sidewalks through the Safe Routes to School Program to encourage walking and biking to schools (ongoing) • The construction of bicycle lanes sidewalks, and multi-use trails throughout the City • Adoption of Native Tree Ordinance (1998), • Native tree reforestation projects at various sites throughout the City; • Partnership with SLO Green Build to promote energy efficiency in new development; • Joined PG&E's Climate Smart Program to purchase carbon credits to offset emissions from City Hall, • Replacement of high pressure sodium light bulbs with energy efficient light emitting diodes (LED) bulbs in street and traffic lights, • Development of a solar financing district through AB 811 to encourage the installation of solar panels and reduce dependence on traditional energy sources (ongoing), and • Development of a Water Conservation Landscape Ordinance(2009) City of Atascadero ., 128 BASELINE • EMISSIONS • NOW 2. Community and Government Operations Inventory Methodology The first step toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions is to identify baseline levels and sources of emissions in the city This information can later inform the selection of a reduction target and possible reduction measures to be included in a climate action plan This section outlines the methodology used to calculate the community and City government operations10 inventories, including the difference between the two inventories, and the data collection process, data sources, GHG emission scopes, data limitations, and means of calculation 2.1 BASELINE AND FORECAST YEARS The year 2005 was selected as the baseline year for the Inventory due to the availability of reliable data and consistency with other cities in San Luis Obispo County The State of California uses 1990 as a reference year to remain consistent with the Kyoto Protocol, and also because it has well-kept records of transportation trends and energy consumption in that year However, cities and counties throughout California typically elect to use 2005 or 2006 as a baseline year because of the more reliable recordkeeping from those years and because of the large amount of growth that has occurred since 1990 This Inventory uses a forecast year of 2020 to be consistent with the State of California GHG Inventory" forecast year and AB 32 target, both of which reference 2020 In addition, it is likely that any forecast beyond 2020 would have a significant margin of error because of unknown population growth rates and new technology The business-as-usual forecast has also been extended to 2025 in consideration of the City's General Plan Horizon 2.2 THE TWO INVENTORIES: COMMUNITY-WIDE AND CITY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS This Inventory is separated into two sections community-wide and City government operations Per ICLEI protocol, the City has completed an assessment of activities throughout the community and a more detailed analysis of City government operations including streetlights 10 In this report, the term city" refers to the incorporated area (the jurisdictional boundary of the City of Atascadero) whereas 'City" refers to those activities that are under the operational control of City agencies. 'Community-wide or community" refers to all activities within the city (as defined above) including those from businesses, industrial processes, residents, vehicles, and City government operations. 11 California Greenhouse Gas Inventory http.//www arb ca.gov/cc/inventory/inventory htm City of Atascadero '.•- 129 COMMUNITY—WIDE AND GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS 2005 building energy use, fleet vehicles and more. The City government operations inventory was conducted consistent with the Local Government Operations Protocol developed by the California Air Resources Board (CARE) ICLEI The Climate Registry and the California Climate Action Registry(CCAR) It is important to note that the City government operations inventory is a subset of the community inventory meaning that all City government operations are included in the commercial/industrial transportation waste, or "other" categories of the community-wide inventory The City's government operations inventory should not be added to the community analysis, rather it should be looked at as a slice of the complete picture as illustrated in Figure 2-1 Although City operations are a small contributor to the community's overall emissions levels, an inventory allows the City to track its individual facilities and vehicles and to evaluate the effectiveness of its emissions reduction efforts at a more detailed level RELATIONSHIPF FIGURE 2-1: THE • 1 GOVERNMENTCITY • ResidentialCommunity- Wide Greenhouse Gas Inventory •mmercial Transportation Other HighwayWaste Industrial Electricity Electricity LocalNatural Gas Natural Gas oadVMT Landfilled Waste equipment Ci City city City Government Government • Government Buildings, Employee• - ommute Landfilled Waste Wastewater Collection a • Treatment •.•- City ofAtascadero 130 BASELINE GREENHOUSE EMISSIONS • Once completed these inventories provide the basis for policy development, the quantification of emissions reductions associated with proposed measures, the creation of an emissions forecast, and the establishment of an informed emissions reduction target. 2.3 DATA COLLECTION AND METHODOLOGY Creating the community and City government operations emissions inventories required the collection of information from a variety of sources. Sources for community data included the Pacific Gas and Electric Company(PG&E) the Southern California Gas Company Caltrans, the California Air Resources Board the California Integrated Waste Management Board and the County of San Luis Obispo City government operations data sources included PG&E, the Southern California Gas Company, Atascadero Waste Alternatives and documentation from multiple City departments including Planning, Public Works Finance, Police Fire and more Data from the year 2005 were used in both inventories, with the following exceptions • A subset of waste data by type was not available for 2005 therefore this study utilizes a California statewide waste characterization study conducted in 2003-2004 • City employee commuting trips were calculated using an employee survey conducted in 2009 and r • Propane, wind and solar power used in both the community-wide and City government inventories. For community activities and City operations, emissions sources are categorized by scope Scopes help us identify where emissions originate from and what entity retains regulatory control and the ability to implement efficiency measures. The scopes are illustrated in Figure 2- 2 and defined as follows. • Scope 1 Direct emissions sources located within the community mostly from the combustion of fuels. Examples of Scope 1 sources include use of fuels such as gasoline and natural gas • Scope 2. Indirect emissions that result because of activities within the community limited to electricity district heating, steam and cooling consumption An example of a Scope 2 source is purchased electricity used within the community These emissions should be included in the community-wide analysis, as they are the result of the community's electricity consumption City of Atascadero 131 COMMUNITY-WIDE GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS 2005 • Scope 3. All other indirect emissions that occur as a result of activity within the community Examples of Scope 3 emissions include methane emissions from solid waste generated within the community which decomposes at landfills either inside or outside of the community EMISSIONSFIGURE 2-2: GHG • • CO2 SFG CHq Ngo HFCs PCFs SCt�RE"l c+•acgz SCOPIE-2, SCUPg$ rwr�ar�r �Ha�a�at •4sii�1.'IitKiBEt;HtE�;;t7rr.C17Y � ;3�' �' „�,�""�"""'�; v,�xrrrn�x�xxcv rm�aar���iaanru Source: NZBCSD (2002), The Challenge of GHG Emissions. the 'why' and 'how' of accounting and reporting for GHG emissions:An Industry Guide,New Zealand Business Council for Sustainable Development,Auckland may,. Appendices A and B of this report separate the community and City government operations emissions by scope Each sector is labeled with a 1 2, or 3 that corresponds to the scopes above. 2.4 DATA SOURCES The data used to complete this Inventory came from multiple sources, as summarized in Tables 2-1 and 2-2. Utility providers supplied electricity and natural gas consumption data associated with commercial, industrial residential and City government buildings in 2005 Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) information was obtained from the 2005 Highway Performance Maintenance System (HPMS) developed by Caltrans and refined with County Geographic Information System (GIS) data. These data sources are further explained in the sector-specific discussions of this document. -•- City of Atascadero -400 132 BASELINE GREENHOUSE EMISSIONS • SOURCESTABLE 2-1: DATA • COMMUNITY 446 Electricity consumption kWh PG&E Residential Natural gas consumption yy Therms Southern California Gas . tW- 0400' -040�' has Local road VMT for Annual average VMT Cal Trans HPMS data unincorporated areas Highway and interstate Annual average VMT Cal Trans HPMS data Transportation VMT for SLO County Portion of highways and interstates within City of Highway miles County GIS shape files Atascadero yraa Emissions from off-road Tons/year of N2O CO2 California Air Resources Other-Off-Road agricultural equipment and CH4 Board OFFROAD2007 model Agricultural Equipment Portion of agricultural land within the City of Square feet County GIS shape files Atascadero City of Atascadero 133 COMMUNITY-WIDE GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS 2005 SOURCESTABLE 2-2: DATA • R CITY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS ANALYSIS, 11 .�< ,fid. w .,. ;, n, _�.. >dt x,• .. •I1M1t11AiiOt1 kt11 ;0 A Electricity consumption kWh PG&E Data Records Buildings&Facilities Natural gas Southern California Gas consumption Therms Company Data Records 411 1.C�it1SilYtptiClt� r4d:. '... Vis, Y , , 0., MS Ins' Mph, Ipwid VeFilct�:; " K 44 &ill4 t na 11 l! Viale hype ,. Employee Commute Sample of employee Annual VMT Commuter Survey(June commuting patterns 2009) Street ,dorlg fir. " Sa Electricity consumption kWh PG&E Data Records~ Methane and nitrous Water/Sewage oxide released in the Public Works wastewater treatment Tonnes Department Data process Records hual wagte> lQ� . Masts 9. dro > x st�a lartdfi�l, Y��` ��emaiGhre . 2.5 DATA LIMITATIONS It is important to note that calculating community-wide greenhouse gas emissions with precision is a complicated task. The ICLEI Clean Air and Climate Protection (CACP2009) software relies on numerous assumptions and is limited by the quantity and quality of available data. Because of these limitations it is useful to think of any specific number generated by the model as an approximation of reality, rather than an exact value The city's actual 2005 greenhouse gas emissions are likely to be slightly greater than what are reported in this document due to three main factors: (1) data limitations, (2) privacy laws and (3) a lack of a reasonable methodology to collect or model emissions data The following paragraphs highlight emissions that cannot be included in a GHG Inventory under current science and policy direction or due to lack of reliable data - City of Atascadero 134 BASELINE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY Data Limitations Lack of available data prevented the calculation of emissions from community-wide freight and passenger trains, off-road vehicles and equipment, propane use, and City government operations refrigerants For rail, port, and other off-road vehicles, as well as equipment emissions the California Air Resources Board OFFROAD 2007 software provides emissions from rail activities, however these numbers are aggregated for the entire San Luis Obispo County area, including incorporated, unincorporated, and state or federally owned land. Lack of data availability also prevents the calculation of emissions fromrp opane (liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG) created within the city's boundaries. Propane is basically an unregulated fuel in California (except for storage and safety issues which are regulated) Because it is an unregulated commodity, no data is collected by the state on propane sales or usage. Another sector that was excluded from the inventory is City government operations refrigerants. The City of Atascadero made a best effort to gather data on the amount of refrigerants consumed by fleet vehicles, HVAC systems, and City government operations facilities, however City records were not suited to this purpose. It is recommended that the City look into amending its record keeping so that the amount of refrigerants purchased and consumed within a year is recorded. Privacy Laws This Inventory does not separately analyze site-level emissions from specific sources such as refineries or large industrial emitters. The emissions from industrial energy consumption and related transportation are included under the commercial/industrial category but will not be analyzed independently as part of this Inventory for two reasons. 1) State privacy laws prevent us from obtaining site-level energy consumption data from utility providers Notably the California Public Utilities Commission 15/15 rule 12 prevents us from analyzing industrial emissions separately from commercial emissions. 2) It is the responsibility of the emitter whether it is a large refinery or household to perform their own energy audit and subsequent reduction process. Efforts to require site- level energy audits and greenhouse gas emissions reporting are being continually 12 Commercial and Industrial Electricity and Natural Gas were combined into one section due to the California 15/15 rule. The 15/15 rule was adopted by the California Public Utilities Commission in the Direct Access Proceeding (CPUC Decision 97-10-031)to protect customer confidentiality City of Atascadero 135 COMMUNITY-WIDE GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS 2005 expanded and required by the California Climate Action Registry U S Environmental Protection Agency, and California Air Resources Board Lack of a Reasonable Methodology There is a lack of reasonable methodology for estimating life cycle emissions for the community and therefore, emissions associated with the production and disposal of items consumed by a community are not included in the Inventory For instance, a life cycle assessment would estimate the emissions associated with the planning, production, delivery and disposal of each car currently in the city In contrast, this analysis only captures how much that car drives within the city Despite these limitations, the Clean Air and Climate Protection (CACP) software 200913 and ICLEI methodology provide the best-available snapshot of the city's greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally the CACP2009 tool is utilized to promote consistency among municipalities throughout the country and the world Sector-specific data limitations or methodological issues are explained thoroughly in Appendices C and D However it is important to note that the emissions identified in this report are primarily greenhouse gases that the community has directly caused and has the ability to reduce through ' implementation of conservation actions, a Climate Action Plan, rk , Nwo or corresponding efforts 2.6 CLEAN AIR AND CLIMATE PROTECTION �tU SOFTWARE 2009 The City government operations and community-wide inventories use the Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 (CACP2009) i ` software package developed by ICLEI in partnership with the 1 National Association of Clean Air Agencies (NACAA) and Torrie Smith Associates This software calculates emissions resulting t from energy consumption vehicle miles traveled and waste � � t generation The CACP2009 software calculates emissions using `;..., specific factors (or coefficients) according to the type of fuel used 13 The Clean Air and Climate Protection (CACP2009) software 2009 was developed by the State and Territorial Air Pollution Program Administrators and the Association of Local Air Pollution Control Officials (SAPPA/ALAPCO) the International Council for Local Environmental Issues (ICLEI) and Torrie Smith Associates. •- City of Atascadero _M610 136 BASELINE GREENHOUSE EMISSIONS • err' CACP2009 aggregates and reports the three main greenhouse gas emissions (CO2, CH4, and N20) and converts them to equivalent carbon dioxide units, or CO2e Equalizing the three main greenhouse gas emissions as CO2e allows for the consideration of different greenhouse gases in comparable terms. For example methane (CI-14) is 21 times more powerful than carbon dioxide on a per weight basis in its capacity to trap heat, so the CACP2009 software converts one metric ton of methane emissions to 21 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents 14 The emissions coefficients and quantification method employed by the CACP2009 software are consistent with national and international inventory standards established by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1996 Revised IPCC Guidelines for the Preparation of National Inventories) and the US Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Reporting Guidelines (EIA form 1605) 14 The potency of a given gas in heating the atmosphere is defined as its Global Warming Potential, or GWP For more information on GWP see: IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Working Group I Chapter 2, Section 2.10 fir+ City of Atascadero 137 COMMUNITY-WIDE GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS 2 • 1 3. Community GHG Inventory Results The City of Atascadero contains primarily residential and commercial land uses In the 2005 baseline year, there were approximately 27 596 people 8 550 jobs, and 10 009 households in the city 15 The following section provides an overview of the emissions caused by activities within the jurisdictional boundary of the city and analyzes the emissions in terms of scope, sector source and population 3.1 COMMUNITY-WIDE EMISSIONS BY SCOPE Although there are countless items that can be included in a community-wide emissions inventory, as discussed in Chapter 2 this Inventory includes Scope 1 Scope 2, and Scope 3 sources from the following sectors, consistent with the ICLEI protocol • Residential • Commercial / Industrial • Transportation • Waste • Other—Off-Road Agricultural Equipment Emissions. Table 3-1 summarizes the scopes of each sector in this analysis. EMISSIONSTABLE 3-1: GHG • URCES INCLUDED IN 2005 COMMUNITY •RY BY SCOPE AND • 11-AD4,51- 77 MAN ....,.rs.......... Residential Natural Gas Electricity --- -77 010 Transportation Gasoline&Diesel --- --- F 3 ,x 3 u 3 Other Off-Road Agricultural --- --- Equipment 15 Population and job data calculated from the ERA Report prepared for the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments,July 2006 revision. Household data calculated through US census data. Page 24 City of Atascadero 138 BASELINE GREENHOUSE EMISSIONS • COMMUNITYFIGURE 3-1: 2005 Including all sectors and scopes, the EMISSIONSGHG • community emitted approximately 176,234 metric tons of CO2e in 2005 As shown in Figure 3-1 and Table 3-2, the majority of Scope 3 community GHG emissions were Scope 1 5.26 N Scope 7 (78.2%), with Scope 2 (16 6%) and Scope 3 78.2% (5.2%) constituting the remainder The largest portion of Scope 1 emissions Scope 2 came from the transportation sector (refer to 16.696 " Table 3-2 and Figure 3-1) These emissions qualify as Scope 1 because they involve the direct combustion of fuel within the jurisdictional boundary of the city The second largest source of Scope 1 emissions was residential natural gas use. Residential uses also generated the largest percentage of Scope 2 emissions Emissions from waste operations account for the majority of Scope 3 emissions, with inventoried off-road emissions contributing a minor portion 1%WTABLE 3-2: COMMUNITY GHG EMISSIONS • SCOPE TONS OF • 3, 3 i r... ,TM., .. oll Residential �{ 22,911 15 892 -- 38,803 141 Transportation 108,223 --- --- 108,223 Others --- --- 148 148 Percentage of Total 78.2% 166% 5.2% 1000% CO2e 16 The other" category includes emissions from off-road agricultural equipment. These sources are categorized as other'to correspond with the ICLEI CACP2009 software 'fir. City of Atascadero •..- 139 COMMUNITY-WIDE AND GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS 2005 ."901 3.2 ALL SCOPE EMISSIONS BY SECTOR As noted above the community emitted approximately 176 234 metric tons of CO2e in calendar year 2005 In addition to analyzing the data by scope, it can also be aggregated by sector As depicted in Figure 3-2 and Table 3-3 below the transportation sector was the largest emitter (61 4%) in 2005 Emissions from the residential sector were the next largest contributor (22%) while the commercial and :-.. .. industrial sectors accounted for a combined 11 3% of thefVhat is >.rbl�o ` 0 026, i�r�iC,n total Emissions from solid waste comprised 5.2% of the :r_1 total and emissions from other sources such as agricultural 17f3 1tiet13t� "df' "�IS equipment comprised 01% of the total. The majority of ! emissions from the transportation sector were the result of =bctitr,baltitat�s. under> Land ,ri ItiQi f gasoline consumption in private vehicles traveling on local reasu"fe°a c� n,: i�rrpetr : i'ae roads, US 101, and state highways GHG emissions fromti0.1il"e1`ftis is. 1s , ... the waste sector are the estimated future emissions that will equulentl1f3 y ,aIeCit result from the decomposition of waste generated by city '" ! U;1'1013�CaufE Mid residents and businesses in the base year 2005 with a resds1; weighted average methane capture factor of 60%. i qr. i t4 Fe �ruM3 07 FIGURE 3-2: 2005 COMMUNITY • . - Waste 5.2% —Other 0.1% Residential Transportation22 ' _, 61.4% '' ...Commercial J Industrial 11.3% •- City of Atascadero .� 140 BASELINE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY TABLE 3-3: COMMUNITY GHG EMISSIONS BY SECTOR (METRIC TONS OF CO E) :' i• .,....�.. ;. 40 F CO2e 38 803 19 977 108,223 9 083 148 176,234 (metric tons) Energy Use 670 824 327 542 1 540,285 n/a n/a 2,538 651 (MMBtu) 3.3 TRANSPORTATION As with the majority of California ; FIGURE 3-3: COMMUNITY GHG municipalities,18 travel by on-road motorized EMISSIONS BY FUEL SOURCE vehicle constitutes the greatest percentage of greenhouse gas emissions in the city (614%) Diesel The Inventory does not include trains or off-road 1695 recreational vehicles as there is no feasible methodology for calculating emissions from these sources. The majority of the emissions in the transportation sector came from travel on local roads (56 4%) in the city (Table 3-4) Approximately 43 6% of the greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation sector resulted from highway travel. Of the total emissions in the transportation sector an estimated 83 9% was due to gasoline consumption, with the —Gasoline remaining 16 1% coming from diesel use (see 84% Figure 3-3 and Table 3-5) 17 The "other" category includes emissions from off-road agricultural equipment. This source is categorized as other'to correspond with the ICLEI CACP2009 software. 18 For a list of California cities and counties that have developed GHG Inventories, refer to the California Office of Planning and Research's website hftp.//www.opr ca.gov City of Atascadero - 141 COMMUNITY-WIDE AND GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS 2 • • TABLE • : TRANSPORTATION GHG EMISSIONS • COZe(metric tons) 61 079 47 144 108,223 .i h F 33 /3aJ 1 3I3�� � {� j h'h y ti,• .fit„c. �,3 i,,, j ,,C " .,.c, N 3 ',:». Y, Energy Use (MMBtu) 869 026 671,259 1 540,285 TABLE 3-5: TRANSPORTATION GHG EMISSIONSSOURCE 01 h COze(metric tons) 90 809 17 414 108,223 3 9 K.r Energy Use (MMBtu) 1 302,375 237 910 1 540,285 These emissions result from the gasoline and diesel consumption of vehicles traveling within the city including those that are just passing through. As a result, it is likely that the City does not have jurisdictional control to reduce the transportation emissions from the majority of this sector However ICLEI and State protocol require that these emissions be included in a local inventory in order to capture all emissions within the area and calculate their effect on the local community The Inventories for all San Luis Obispo cities and the county use this methodology for consistency and to avoid double-counting of transportation emissions This analysis of highway transportation emissions assumes constant levels of travel along all highways in the county The Caltrans data includes aggregated vehicle miles traveled (VMT) along highways for the whole county, including incorporated and unincorporated areas. This data was allocated to municipal jurisdictions using the proportion of highway miles in the city and other incorporated and unincorporated areas, traffic counts were not used to measure actual traffic levels at specific locations This could mean that the community-wide transportation emissions are slightly inflated or understated, however, there is currently no feasible methodology to calculate emissions for individual jurisdictions with traffic data levels Further discussion of the transportation sector methodology is included in Appendix C Emissions that resulted from the air and rail travel of city residents were not included in the transportation sector analysis. As science and data collection methodology develop it is likely •- City of Atascadero 142 BASELINE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS • - that the greenhouse gas emissions from air rail and boat travel could be estimated as a Scope 3 items. Please see Appendix C for more detail on methods and emissions factors used in calculating emissions from the transportation sector 3.4 THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT (RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL) With all scopes aggregated, 33 3% of total community-wide emissions in the year 2005 came from the "built environment. The built environment is comprised of the residential, commercial and industrial natural gas and electricity consumption. This analysis does not include emissions from other types of energy such as propane solar, and wind due to lack of reliable sales, construction, or consumption data The commercial and industrial sectors are combined in this Inventory due to the mandatory aggregating of commercial and industrial data by PG&E previously referenced. In 2005 emissions from the built environment were split roughly 66-34% between the residential sector and the commercial/industrial sector (see Figure 3-4) All of the emissions calculated from the built environment were the result of local natural gas consumption (Scope 1) and local consumption of electricity generated outside of the city (Scope 2) Overall electricity consumption and natural gas consumption were split evenly (50-50%) as the cause of emissions from the built environment in 2005 as shown in Figure 3-5 %W ENVIRONMENTFIGURE 3-4: BUILT ENVIRONMENT EMISSIONSGHIG • - GHG EMISSIONSSOURCE Residential Electricity 50% Commercial J Industrial Natural6as f 34% 50% fir+' City ofAtascadero -..- 143 COMMUNITY-WIDE • • GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS 2005 Approximately 61% of emissions in the residential sector resulted from combustion of natural gas for heating and cooking (see Figure 3-6 and Table 3-6), while over 99% of emissions in the commercial/industrial sector came from natural gas usage (see Figure 3-7 and Table 3-7) COMMERCIAL/FIGURE 3-6: RESIDENTIAL GHG FIGURE 3-7: EMISSIONS • URCE INDUSTRIAL GHG EMISSIONS BY SOURCE Electricity. Natural Gas 67% 59% .a Electricity / 41% Natural Gas 33% It is useful to consider the causes behind significant variations in data when developing policies and programs to reduce emissions from each sector For example, the policies that would aim to reduce emissions from the commercial/industrial sector may differ from those aiming to reduce emissions from the residential sector based upon the information above (and in the figures and tables below) In this regard this Inventory provides valuable insight into policy development strategies. TABLE •: RESIDENTIAL GHG EMISSIONS BY SOURCE CO2e(metric tons) 15,892 22,911 38 803* 3 Energy Use(MMBtu) 231 309 1435123 666 432 •- City of Atascadero 144 BASELINE GREENHOUSE INVENTORYEMISSIONS fir►' COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIALTABLE 3-7: • SOURCES Mml CO2e(metric tons) 13 374 6 603 19,977 a N 3 Energy Use (MMBtu) 295 700 240 473 536 173 3.5 WASTE Solid waste disposed of at managed landfills was responsible for 5.2% of total emissions for the community The CACP2009 software calculates methane generation from waste sent to landfill in 2005 and accounts for the reported methane recovery factors among the two utilized landfills (Cold Canyon and Chicago Grade) which have a 60% weighted average The Chicago Grade Landfill accepted approximately 99% of the community's solid waste, while less than 1% went to Cold Canyon The methane recovery factors of the landfills are well documented by the San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District based on the system operations at that time For more fir►. information, please see detailed methodology in Appendix C Waste emissions are considered Scope 3 emissions because they are not generated in the base year, but will result from the decomposition of waste generated in 2005 over the full 100- year+ cycle of its decomposition. In 2005 the community sent approximately 31,122 52 tons of waste to landfill. The 2004 California Statewide Waste Characterization Study provides standard waste composition for the State of California. Identifying the different types of waste in the general mix is necessary because during decomposition various materials generate methane within the anaerobic environment of landfills at differing rates. Carbonaceous materials such as paper and wood would actually sequester the methane released in managed landfills, thereby offsetting some or all of the emissions from food and plant waste However, GHG sequestration at the landfills has been set to zero, based on guidance in the Local Government Operations Protocol which recommends eliminating the effect of landfill sequestration for both government operations inventories and community inventories, to be consistent with the principle that local government operations and community inventories should not account for emissions sinks. Figure 3-8 and Table 3-8 show the estimated percentage of emissions coming from the various types of organic, methanogenic waste City of Atascadero 145 COMMUNITY-WIDE AND GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS 2005 FIGURE 3-8: WASTE GHG EMISSIONS BY TYPE 0 000 Paper Products 5,071 5 000 j 4 000 . p 3 000 Food Waste 1,989 2 000 Wood/Textiles g 1,490 1 000 ....., ' Plant Debris 533 _.__ .. ' TABLE 3-8: WASTE GHG EMISSIONS BY WASTE TYPE CO2e(metric tons) 5071 1 989 533 1 490 9 083 �j{ •, 0,j�.it x f rJjQ33 \ /a S b tP 3 9 AN Energy Use(MMBtu) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.6 OTHER— OFF-ROAD AGRICULTURAL EQUIPMENT Off-road agricultural equipment including tractors, mowers, balers, combines tillers and other equipment produced approximately 0 1% of emissions in 2005 or 148 metric tons CO2e. This calculation was performed using the California Air Resources Board OFFROAD2007 model and inputted into the other' category in CACP2009 The OFFROAD model generates emission inventories by equipment type, accounting for age within a given year(2005) The OFFROAD software has the ability to calculate emissions from other types of off-road vehicles such as recreational vehicles, motor boats, and more. However, since data is aggregated by county this information is only usable if it can be divided by jurisdiction within the county in a reasonable manner As a reminder this emissions inventory is a snapshot of emissions caused by activities within the city in the year 2005 Therefore, absent a methodology •- City of Atascadero �fto 146 BASELINE EMISSIONS INVENTORY for estimating the portion of off-road vehicles driven or used within various jurisdictions, OFFROAD data cannot be allocated to different jurisdictions. As current practice and methodology stands, population data is not an acceptable measure of emissions per jurisdiction To complete the analysis of impacts associated with agriculture activities, the Inventory allocated total agricultural emissions by the percentage of agricultural and open space land contained in each jurisdiction For consistency county agriculture and crop GIS data from 2007 was utilized to determine acreage within each jurisdiction. The city held a very minor part of agricultural land (0.23%) and therefore only a small portion associated off-road agricultural equipment emissions. �• ,g,,,. _�.y�'aa� i�ssY�t>r� =vit�:3n�fi _3�� ���'�! .moi. �+„y$y. .. A # .i'1 •aiI€�' �SiM� .7i'dF�r[, 'rM !1' k} I > TI3StS' 8!t H "a . Mr Qui ' h” 31t; ��Qt1e G�$ Crf� ► '1e"t1it ,tl �5 Tat W'ol1s:' 1k `1 � f{ t1d Air' 06d at 00 Qou WIh � 1 saq.. H t� olrn rrajal rtny lat � il : , ".',. . �?�. t>d tfariil��n aff Oh�l ,us "' ark i� ��©n t a a}tcs�ed >, ,r o�402-14 agn u[tur ;. 00 NO F% z el 3.7 COMMUNITY EMISSIONS BY SOURCE In addition to viewing emissions by sector and by scope policy and programs development can benefit from an analysis of emissions according to their raw fuel or waste source. Figure 3-9 and Table 3-9 below demonstrates that more than half (51 5%) of all community emissions come from the consumption of gasoline on local roads and highways. Natural gas (16 7%) and electricity (16 6%) consumption from the built environment are the next most significant figures, with the remainder coming from diesel, off-road equipment and various waste products. Methane released from the City's wastewater treatment plant is not included in this figure because the wastewater treatment plant is considered a point source emitter Point source emitters are not captured at the community-wide scale in greenhouse gas emissions inventories. ,%W City of Atascadero '-•- 147 COMMUNITY-WIDE GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS 2005 COMMUNITYFIGURE 3-9: • SOURCE 90809- 90,000 080990,000 80,000 70,000 d 60,000 N 50,000 C O 1- 40,000 29,266 29,514 30,000 ` 17 414 20,000 q' E 10,000 9 083 148 0 Electricity Natural Gas Gasoline Diesel Off-Road 1 Solid Wast Energy Fuel Methane TABLE ' : COMMUNITY GHG EMISSIONSSOURCE 10 I' mww"', 011,11;l"J","1 Electricity 29,266 16.6% will 6 Gasoline 90 809 51.5% Xnfr It SIS yfi ggr, �d3 X3 Off-Road Equipment 148 01% Fj ON n„ 3 TOTAL 176,234 100% -•- City of Atascadero 148 BASELINE • EMISSIONS • 3.8 PER CAPITA EMISSIONS , . Per capita emissions can be a useful metric for measuring ' ��� !' � progress in reducing greenhouse gases and for comparing one In�r+�ntoy, _ vaTbon" �r�o�piri»t community's emissions with neighboring cities and against regional and national averages. Currently it is difficult to make ' s �ra �ates+�r�ii$si€�n�- meaningful comparisons between local inventories because of j8" ds ." tins" variations in the scope of inventories conducted For instance p f lest ,-Irifan: to purity th2it this Inventory takes in to account emissions from agricultural off- we ow""h.�?mi b- fil let .;A road vehicles, which many inventories like the Sonoma County corbo -' i r +: t e GHG Inventory do not. Only when ICLEI, the California Air ' Resources Board, and other organizations adopt universal reen..gbse;gg$'*nqris reporting standards will local inventories be prepared in a ride �r"a+erszwe rtt is utd` consistent manner and therefore be comparable ;r Jude:=t e.emisst< s'from Simply dividing total community greenhouse gas emissions by so,WOM thie ) cit population in 2005 27,596 yields a result of 6 79 metric tonsoias%iiipitn assaeted'wrih Y p p 1s ( ) Y� CO2e per capita. It is important to understand that this numbers y}yj y��.y�yj w ►y $ µ is not the same as the carbon footprint of the average individual difcirr)ttiaisyenate living in the City of Atascadero It is also important to note that r 'nib iri E3 t the per capita emissions number for the city is not directly `p pal�t comparable to every per capita number produced by otherp . � ' als:may:reduce th �r emissions studies because of differences in emission inventory arban' otprttatby buying a�allj�apxo�i�c;ed�0c?de and methods. �ec�treicin ? � es'tCt� � 19 Population in 2005 derived from the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments Long Range Socio- Economic Projections (Year 2025) July 2006 Revision. City of Atascadero ..- 149 COMMUNITY—WIDE AND GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS 21 1 4. City Government Operations GHG Emissions Inventory Results The City of Atascadero government is comprised of seven departments. City Manager Administrative Services, Police and Fire Services, Community Development, Community Services, and Public Works. This Inventory accounts for the 128 people employed by the City and City-owned and/or —operated buildings and facilities in 2005 This chapter reviews the results of the City government operations inventory by sector including employee commuting emissions. 4.1 CITY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS INVENTORY RESULTS City government operations and facilities produced approximately 4128 metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions in 2005 As displayed in Figure 4-1 this approximately 2.3% of total community-wide emissions City government emissions result from waste energy consumption from wastewater facilities, buildings, streetlights and other facilities, fuel consumption by the vehicle and transit fleet and employee commutes, wastewater treatment processes, and miscellaneous equipment. The wastewater facilities and processes were the largest contributor to the City's emissions (70 7%) with 2,920 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent. The vehicle fleet (9 7%) was the second largest contributor to the City's emissions with 402 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent. (Refer to Figure 4-2 and Table 4-1 below) , GOVERNMENTFIGURE 4-1: CITY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS CONTRIBUTIONTO OPERATIONS GHG EMISSIONS COMMUNITY-WIDE • • Transit Fleet_ VehicleFlaet_ 5.2% � Streetlights 9.7% .„. Employee &Traffic Municipal Buildings Commute Signals 2.3% 4.5% 7.79E „xF r�/ Water Solid Wastea Delivery 1.2% f{ff 1 0.132% 9 Vk Community/ Wide Wastewater-/ Facilities 977% 70.7% •- City of Atascadero 150 BASELINE GREENHOUSE EMISSIONS • As mentioned in the Introduction these emissions are a subset of the community emissions inventory discussed in Chapter 3. The City's government operations emissions are separately analyzed in this section in a manner that is similar to how an industry or business would produce a facility-scale greenhouse gas audit. The Local Government Greenhouse Gas Inventory Protocol developed by the California Air Resources Board, The Climate Registry, the California Climate Action Registry, and ICLEI guides the methodology for estimating emissions from local government operations Local government emissions reporting is deemed significant in order to establish local governments as climate leaders in the community so that they can lead by example and pave the way for energy efficiency improvements. TABLE 4-1: 2005 CITY GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS EMISSIONSGHG • N COze (metric 317 402 214 185 40 1 2,920 49 4128 tons) ,I. Irr+ Energy Use (MMBtu) 5 054 5,672 3,073 2,621 615 10 4 032 n/a 21 077 4.2 BUILDING SECTOR The building sector includes greenhouse gas ! FIGURE 4-3: BUILDING GHG emissions from energy consumption in facilities, EMISSIONS BY SOURCE owned and operated by a municipality but does not included facilities located at the wastewater Natural Gas ,. treatment plant. Electricity consumption in 21. r facilities located at the wastewater treatment plant are included in the Wastewater Facilities Sector This inventory calculates electricity and natural gas consumption in City-owned and -operatedF ` facilities. The facilities included in this analysis ° ` �i include City Hall, fire and police Stations, x recreation facilities, Charles Paddock Zoo parks, and numerous other facilities As depicted in ' Eiecr, qty F. ,F Figure 4-3 and Table 4-2, the majority of emissions resulted from electricity consumption (785%) City of Atascadero '-•- 151 COMMUNITY-WIDE AND GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS 2005 It should be noted that the historic Administration Building has been unoccupied since 2004 In 2004, an earthquake damaged the historic building and forced the City to move its government offices to another building in downtown. Subsequently, this Inventory does not include energy consumption in the historic Administration Building Estimated emissions for City Hall are from a more energy efficient building where government offices were located in 2005 The City has been working with the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) to obtain the necessary funding to restore the building to pre-earthquake condition Once the building has been repaired to pre-earthquake condition, the City plans to upgrade the building These upgrades will likely increase the efficiency of the Administration Building, however, because there was no baseline emissions calculated the amount of increase in efficiency is unknown The City plans to move its government offices back to the Administration building within the next couple of years. The relocation is likely to affect the business-as-usual forecast. SECTORTABLE 4-2: BUILDING • SOURCE, 11 CO2e(metric tons) 249 68 317 SHE V Energy Use (MMBtu) 3 781 1,273 5 054 These emissions and associated consumption data will be useful in determining significant sources of energy consumption from City facilities. This will allow for the City to designate priority facilities for energy efficiency retrofits and conservation outreach. 4.3 VEHICLE AND TRANSIT FLEET City-owned and -operated vehicles emitted approximately 407 metric tons of CO2e, or 3 7% of total City government emissions. This sector includes gasoline and diesel consumption from all departments in the City operating vehicles, including the Fire and Police Departments, Community Services, Public Works, and Community Development. This sector also includes the transit fleet operated by the City This estimate is based on 2005 fuel billing record data provided by the Finance Department for most departments. The Police Department provided their own fuel consumption data as their records are were more complete than the fuel billing records. •- City of Atascadero 152 BASELINE • EMISSIONS77::] INVENTORY The majority of fuel used by the City is FIGURE 4-4: VEHICLE FLEET FUEL gasoline (54%) with the remainder diesel CONSUMPTION PER - BY TYPE (46%) (see Figure 4-4) When compared to the total emissions per fuel type, diesel Diesel emissions actually produce less CO2e for 37% the vehicle types used by the City However there are other non-COze �1 emissions from diesel-like particulate x£ j 3 g " matter that make such a comparison y misleading to the reader The trend for diesel to emit less COZe in this case does not necessarily mean that the City should Gas 6391 _ aim to convert more vehicles to r. conventional diesel. There are multiple clean and alternative fuel options available, including biodiesel conversion, electric vehicles, hybrid vehicles smaller vehicles, and shared vehicles 4.4 EMPLOYEE COMMUTE ,% r This sector estimates greenhouse gas emissions from City employees traveling to and from work in 2005 The estimate is based on a June 2009 online survey conducted by the City a blank version of which is included as Appendix F Approximately 69 employees responded to the survey with usable information, meaning that all essential questions were answered This results in approximately a 58% response rate, the results of which were applied to the City employment total for 2005 The online survey found that most City employees travel to and from work by car Employees were asked how many days of the week they travel by each commute mode including driving alone (which includes motorcycles), carpooling vanpooling public transit, bicycling walking telecommuting, and other The results show that employees get to and from 77 4% of their workdays by personal vehicle The second most popular mode of transportation was bicycling (10 7%) followed by walking and other means such as skateboarding with a combined 7.2% of the total. City of Atascadero '-•- 153 COMMUNITY—WIDE • • GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS 20 • • - '-3: DAYS OF •YEE TRAVEL BY COMMUTE MODE Drive Alone 12},,792 77�y4��%r Vanpool 52 0.3% Bicycle 1 768 107% Nc Other 676 41% r ,, ,, Q * These figures for commute mode were combined with each respondent's travel distance to work, car model (if any) and fuel type (if any) The results show vehicle miles traveled (VMT) annually per vehicle type and fuel type (see Table 4-4) These VMT numbers were then adjusted for the total employee population in 2005 and entered into the CACP2009 software to obtain CO2e Driving patterns were assumed to be constant for the purposes of this study- therefore, the 2009 sample was applied directly to the 2005 employee population Only one modification to the sample data was made in order to account for the large increase in hybrid car sales between 2005 and 2009 The proportion of hybrid to traditional vehicles was roughly two-thirds less in 2005 than in 2009 according to State sales data.20 The 2009 surrey results, adjusted for 2005 employee totals, resulted in an estimate of 185 metric tons CO2e in 2005 from commuter travel to and from work. This figure comprises 4 5% of total greenhouse gas emissions released from City government operations. The calculation does not include employee business travel or travel during lunchtime hours. 20 www hybridcars corn •- • City of Atascadero 154 BASELINE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY EMPLOYEETABLE 4-4: • y. * 56 197 86 Gasoline 120 997 07 Gasoline Light Truck/SUV/Pickup 31308 Diesel 54476 Diesel 3 r c y... 'a:r.3�, ?� >ww ,',`�., 1.3 ,,.gam Passenger Vehicle 138 885 77 Gasoline 183 403 96 Gasoline Total 235,069 16 373,975 86 Employee business travel is usually included in a City government GHG Inventory per protocol however, we could not include it in this baseline analysis due to data limitations. The City maintains financial records of when employees travel by air or vehicle to conferences and other events, however it does not keep records of business travel destinations. As such, this Inventory could not accurately account for GHG emissions from employee business travel A minor adjustment to City recordkeeping would allow the data to be included in the next City government operations GHG inventory 4.5 STREETLIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS The electricity consumed by City streetlights and traffic signals in calendar year 2005 resulted in approximately 40 metric tons of CO2e, or approximately 1 0% of total City government emissions This Inventory accounts for approximately 289 streetlights and 9 traffic signals. 4.6 WATER AND SEWAGE The City of Atascadero does not provide potable water to its residents. The Atascadero Mutual Water Company provides residents with drinking water and, therefore the City does not have regulatory control over the distribution of potable water within the City Emissions associated with the pumping and distribution of potable water is included in the commercial/industrial sector of the community-wide section of the Inventory This inventory provides emissions from the collection treatment, and disposal of wastewater In 2005, electricity consumption from wastewater facilities in the City emitted approximately 263 metric tons of CO2e, or 9 0% of total emissions related to wastewater (see Figure 4-5) This category includes energy use at the Wastewater Treatment Plant and the numerous lift stations City of Atascadero 155 COMMUNITY-WIDE GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS 2 ! ! and pumps necessary to convey effluent to the treatment plant. Point-source emissions that arise from the wastewater treatment system due to fermentation of discarded biomass in the lagoons resulted in an additional 2,657 metric tons of CO2e increasing the percentage of total emissions attributed to wastewater facilities to 70 7% of government operations emissions. EMISSIONSFIGURE 4-5: GHG • WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT _Electricity , 9.0% 4� \4 Methane- 91.D% The wastewater treatment plant consists of four aerated lagoons and is a cost effective way to treat wastewater However aside from the aeration of these lagoons, the City does not use additional processes to treat the influent. As organic matter is broken down through the process of lagoons, methane is released into the atmosphere. Approximately half (50%) of the community is served by sewer and the other 50 percent on septic. Due to a lack of methodology for calculating emissions resulting from septic systems, these emissions are not included in the Inventory While this Inventory identifies methane from the wastewater treatment plant as the major contributor to the government's operations emissions, emissions from other sectors and sources within government operations should not be overlooked entirely This Inventory is meant to identify the sources of emissions from the City's operations. It does not recommend or mandate improvements or upgrades to the wastewater treatment plant. Upgrading the wastewater treatment plant to reduce greenhouse gas emissions would likely require a complete redesign of ..- City of Atascadero 156 BASELINE GREENHOUSE EMISSIONSr the wastewater treatment plant and be very costly Emissions associated with government operations are broken down further in Section 4.9 4.7 WASTE Similar to the Community-Wide analysis waste produced by City facilities was calculated using the methane commitment method The CACP2009 calculates the methane expected to be released from this landfilled waste over the course of its lifetime In 2005, Atascadero Waste Alternatives estimates City facilities sent a total of 168 65 tons of waste to landfill, producing 49 metric tons of CO2e, or 1.2% of total emissions. Unlike other sectors analyzed the emissions from waste disposed of in 2005 will occur over multiple years as the waste breaks down over time This category includes only those emissions generated by waste produced at City facilities and does not include the total emissions released from the landfill 4.8 OTHER— MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT Emissions from miscellaneous equipment such as general service equipment and equipment used at park facilities would be included in the 'other' category of the Inventory Due to data limitations, emissions from these 'other' sources could not be quantified The Finance Department keeps record of miscellaneous equipment; however, fuel billing records do not identify fuel purchased for miscellaneous equipment versus fleet vehicles. A minor adjustment in City recordkeeping will allow for future inventories to quantify these emissions. 4.9 CITY EMISSIONS BY SOURCE It can also be helpful to view overall City government emissions by source As shown in Table 4.5 and Figure 4 6 the majority of emissions are from methane produced at the wastewater treatment plant during the treatment of wastewater (64 4%) Electricity (13 4%) consumption in City-owned buildings, streetlights, and water and wastewater facilities is the second largest source of emissions. Gasoline consumption by the vehicle and transit fleets account for 13 7% of government operations emissions and natural gas, miscellaneous equipment, diesel and solid waste contributed in decreasing amounts to the remaining 8 5% of the overall City greenhouse gas emissions. Since the majority of greenhouse gas emissions are associated with the wastewater treatment plant and water treatment processes and strategies to reduce emissions at the treatment plant would require an expensive redesign of the plant, Table 4.5 also breaks down emissions by source with emissions from the wastewater treatment plant and water treatment processes excluded. Viewing emissions without the wastewater treatment plant (see Figure 4.7) will aide the City in identifying other sources of emissions within their operations that are equally as important in reducing the City's overall greenhouse gas emissions. City of Atascadero '.•- 157 COMMUNITY-WIDE AND GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS 2005 GOVERNMENTTABLE 4-5: CITY OPERATIONS GHG EMISSIONS BY SOURCE 00 C' r° slalf A[Seic it IWASio x t 'r►axB,.:!�?116R1C�; s ���'���A`CI�1'�. ,, ..'��'� ,�4`' ,•', l`# 1'1 .. , } Electricity 552 134% 289 239% Gasoline 567 137% 567 469% Solid Waste Decomposition 49 1.2% 49 41% (Methane) F. TOTAL 4 128 100% 1,207 100% .ow GOVERNMENTFIGURE 4-6: CITY OPERATIONS GHG EMISSIONS BY SOURCE 3,000 2,500 O 2,000 V C 1,500 F- u w 1,000 d 500 0 Electricity Natural Gas Gasoline Diesel Solid Waste Wastewater Decomposition Treatment Processes `-•- City of Atascadero rlriM� 158 BASELINE G . e • EMISSIONS INVENTORY � FIGURE 4-7: CITY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS EMISSIONSGHG BY SECTOR WITH WASTEWATER TREATMENT REMOVED Wastewater Buildings& Facilities Facilities z&2% Water Delivery o01 Streetlights &rff, srk-------' > \\ 0.46A © « _Vehicle Fleet Employee---' 33.3% 33.3%� R2 Commute 1.7% \ d ±2K \ \ Transit Flee *4w' 177% City dgm2dr 159 COMMUNITY—WIDE AND GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS 2 • • S. Forecast The emissions forecast for the City of Atascadero represents a business-as-usual prediction of how community-wide GHG levels will change over time if consumption trends and behavior continue as they did in 2005 These predictions are based on the community inventory results included in this report and statistics on job household and population growth from the City The analysis shows that if behavior and consumption trends continue as business-as-usual emissions will reach 227 674 metric tons of CO2e by 2020 or a 29.2% increase over 2005 baseline levels (see Figure 5-1) By 2025 emissions will reach 242,428 metric tons of CO2e or a 37 5% increase over 2005 baseline levels FIGURE 5-1: 2020 AND 2025 BUSINESS-AS-USUAL PROJECTED GROWTH • . EMISSIONS 275,000 250 000 225,000 200000 __._.___._...__._......_.__._,_, 175,000 — --- _._ ,_,,, _......._ ■Other 150,000 Waste 125,000 --.—.-..- --_.,____. --,_ ■Transportation 100,00(1 r Commercial/industrial Residential 75,000 _.._... 50,000 ... �� . . ....... . 0 0 y y 2005 2020 2025 The forecast does not quantify emissions reductions from State or federal activities including AB 32, the renewable portfolio standard and SB 375 Additionally, it does not take into account reduction activities already underway or completed since 2005, the results of which likely put the community's emissions on a track well below the business-as-usual linear projection -•- City of Atascadero 160 BASELINE GREENHOUSE EMISSIONS • Forecasts were performed by applying household job, and population growth rates to 2005 community-wide greenhouse gas emissions levels. Baseline data and estimated growth were obtained from a long-range projections report developed by the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments in 2006 as revised in May 2009 The "mid-range" cases for population, job, and household growth were used in this forecast estimation City government operations emissions are not separately analyzed as part of this forecast due to a lack of reasonable growth indicators for the City government sector However an increase in emissions is not expected for existing facilities and operations in the City government operations sector If anything the City expects that emissions within the scope of the 2005 City government operations inventory will decrease because of energy efficiency improvements fleet upgrades, and the consolidation of Fire and Police Services with adjacent jurisdictions At the same time, it is likely the City will have to expand services and infrastructure to accommodate the expected growth in the region, which could add new sources of emissions to the City government operations inventory that did not exist in 2005 City of Atascadero Page 161 COMMUNITY-WIDE GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS 2005 6. Conclusion and Next Steps The City of Atascadero has made a formal commitment to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions. This report lays the :. groundwork for those efforts by estimating baseline emission levels against which future progress can be demonstrated This analysis found that the community was responsible for emitting 176,234 metric tons of CO2e in the base year 2005, with the transportation sector contributing the most (61 4%) to this I t �tw 3 0a total As a component of the community-wide analysis City F 4 MUN government operations produced 4 128 metric tons of CO2e or g � ,., 0110, 2 3% of the total. In addition to establishing the baseline for tracking progress over time, this report serves to identify the major sources of city emissions, and therefore the greatest A opportunities for emission reductions. In this regard, the MIM emissions inventory ought to inform the focus of the City's , '. Climate Action Plan If no action is taken, this report found that v 7l u � business-as-usual (worst case scenario) emissions will likely rise �� t y by 29.2% by 2020 and 37 5% by 2025 3 v It is important to note that in order to remain consistent with greenhouse gas reduction methodology, all future quantifications 20Z �F of reduction activities must be subtracted from this `business-as- - �- usual' line Not doing so would be assuming that emissions remain at constant 2005 levels while reduction activities are underway In reality, the City's climate action efforts will be working against a rising emissions level due to job population and household growth Figure 6-1 below shows the business-as-usual emissions forecast in relation to 2005 baseline levels and the 15% reduction below 2005 levels recommended by the State Attorney General and Air Resources Board.21 The difference between the business-as-usual forecast and the reduction targets is actually 44.2% in 2020 and 63 4% in 2025, which makes the State's recommended reduction goal challenging, but still feasible As noted in the Forecast section, it is likely that the City's 21 The AB 32 Climate Chance Scoping Plan Document prepared by the Air Resources Board calls for reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by cutting approximately 30 percent from business-as- usual emission levels projected for 2020 or about 15 percent from today's levels. •- '• City of Atascadero 1010, 162 BASELINE GREENHOUSE EMISSIONS • sustainability efforts have already caused emissions to fall below the business-as-usual linear projection line, thus making the 77,848 metric tons CO2e reduction by 2020 achievable FORECASTFIGURE 6-1: GHG • TO REDUCTION 250,000 Business-as- Actual y� usual forecast Reduction 227,647 metric tons CO2e by =77,848 225,000 2020;242,428 metric metric tons tons CO2e by 2025 (44.2%)by 200,000 2020; 2005 baseline 111,720 levels metric 176,234 metric tons 175,000 tons CO2e (63.4%) by 15%Below 2005 2025 baseline levels= below 149,799 metric 150,000 tons CO2e by business- tons pursuing as-usual 80%reduction by 2050=35,247 125,000 metric tons CO2e *rW 2005 2020 2025 As the City moves forward to the next milestones in the process, including designation of emission reduction targets and development of a Climate Action Plan the City should identify and quantify the emission reduction benefits of projects that have already been implemented since 2005 as well as the emissions reduction benefits of existing General Plan policies. The benefits of both existing strategies can be tallied against the baseline established in this report to determine the appropriate set of strategies that will deliver the City to its chosen emissions reduction goal. �1rr► City of Atascadero '-•- 163 APPENDIX A: CACP DETAILED REPORT FOR COMMUNITY- WIDE EMISSIONS, 2005 *rr 165 4/6/2010 Page 1 Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005 Detailed Report CO2 N2O CH Equiv CO2 Energy (tonnes) (kg) (kg) (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) Residential San Luis Obsipo APCD,CA 1 SoCal Gas Company Residential Natural Gas Natural Gas 22,725 428 2,527 22,911 13.0 428,287 Subtotal 1 SoCal Gas Compar 22,725 428 2,527 22,911 13.0 428,287 Source(s): Southern California Gas Co.data provided by Colby Morrow Air Quality Manager Customer Programs Environmental Affairs;office:559.324.0109 or email CLMorrow@semprautilities.com. Notes: 1 Conversion of 1 MCF=10 therms was used. 2.Default Fuel CO2 Set. 3.CEC Emission Factor for Natural Gas RCI Average Set 2 PG&E Residential Electricity Electricity 15,762 355 935 15,892 90 242,538 Subtotal 2 PG&E Residential E 15 762 355 935 15,892 9.0 242,538 Source(s): All PG&E data was provided by John Bohman,Pacific Gas and Electric Company Green Communities and Innovator Pilots,415-973-0040 or jzbx@PGE.com. Notes: The 'PG&E California"electricity coefficient set is based on the 2005 PG&E eCO2 emission factor of 0 489 lbs/kWh of delivered electricity This emissions factor is certified by the California Climate Action Regisry Criteria air pollutant emission factors for electricity are derived from the NERC Region 13-Western Systems Coordinating Council/CNV Average Grid. Subtotal Residential 38,487 783 3 462 38,803 22.0 670,824 Commercial San Luis Obsipo APCD,CA 1 SoCal Gas Company Commercial Natural Gas Natural Gas 6,438 121 716 6,491 3.7 121,340 Subtotal 1 SoCal Gas Compar 6,438 121 716 6 491 3.7 121,340 Source(s): Southern California Gas Co.data provided by Colby Morrow Air Quality Manager Customer Programs Environmental Affairs;office:559.324.0109 or email CLMorrow@semprautilities.com. Notes: This report has been generated for San Luis Obsipo APCD CA using ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software. 1%W 167 4/6/2010 Page 2 Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005 `"41101 Detailed Report CO2 N2O CH Equiv CO2 Energy (tonnes) (kg) (kg) (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) 1Conversion of 1 MCF=10 therms was used. 2.Default Fuel CO2 Set. 3.CEC Emission Factor for Natural Gas RCI Average Set 2 PG&E Commercial+Industrial Electricity Electricity 13,264 298 787 13,374 7.6 204102 Subtotal 2 PG&E Commercial 13,264 298 787 13,374 7.6 204102 Source(s): All PG&E data was provided by John Bohman, Pacific Gas and Electric Company Green Communities and Innovator Pilots;415-973-0040 or jzbx@PGE.com. Notes: 1 The 'PG&E California"electricity coefficient set is based on the 2005 PG&E eCO2 emission factor of 0.489 lbs/kWh of delivered electricity This emissions factor is certified by the California Climate Action Regisry Criteria air pollutant emission factors for electricity are derived from the NERC Region 13-Western Systems Coordinating Council/CNV Average Grid.2.Commercial and Industrial electricity are combined due to the 15/15 Rule,which was adopted by the CPUC in the Direct Access Proceeding(CPUC Decision 97 10-031)to protect customer confidentiality The 15/15 rule requires that any aggregated information provided by the Utilities must be made up of at least 15 customers and a single customer' Subtotal Commercial 19 703 420 1,503 19,864 11.3 325,442 Industrial San Luis Obsipo APCD,CA 1 SoCal Gas Company Industrial Natural Gas Natural Gas 111 2 12 112 0.1 2,100 Subtotal 1 SoCal Gas Compar 111 2 12 112 0.1 2,100 Source(s): Southern California Gas Co.data provided by Colby Morrow Air Quality Manager Customer Programs Environmental Affairs;office:559.324.0109 or email CLMorrow@semprautilities.com. Notes: 1 Conversion of 1 MCF=10 therms was used. 2.Default Fuel CO2 Set. 3 CEC Emission Factor for Natural Gas RCI Average Set Subtotal Industrial 111 2 12 112 01 2,100 This report has been generated for San Luis Obsipo APCD CA using ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software. -41111 168 4/6/2010 Page 3 Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005 Detailed Report CO2 N 2 0 CH Equiv CO2 Energy (tonnes) (kg) (kg) (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) Transportation San Luis Obsipo APCD,CA 1 Highway Community VMT Diesel 7,361 21 1047 7,389 4.2 100,960 Gasoline 38,745 2,895 5,359 39,755 22.6 570,299 Subtotal Highway Communit 46,106 2,916 6,406 47145 26.8 671,259 Source(s) 1 Emissions factors for gas and diesel per vehicle class provided by EMFAC 2007 v2.3 run by Tom Scheffelin,California Air Resources Board Planning and Technical Support Division,Tscheffe@arb.ca.gov Manipulated by Jaime Hill,PMC, jhill@PMCworld.com to convert EMFAC vehicle classes to those used in CACP 2. Highway road segments derived from San Luis Obispo County GIS shapefiles for roads and political boundaries,provided by Bobby Jo Close,Mapping Systems Specialist at the County of San Luis Obispo.Manipulated by John DeMartino,PMC, jdemartino@PMCworld.com. Notes. 1 Diesel Heavy Duty Vehicles includes Transit Buses,based on a weighted average of Trucks representing 98 7%of the category and Transit Buses representing 3.3%. 2. Gasoline Passenger Vehicles includes Motorcycles,based on a weighted average of Passenger Vehicles representing 98.7%of the category and Motorcycles representing 1.3%. 3 Highway maintained miles differ slightly from HPMS data. It is likely that the County's GIS 123shapefile is more detailed than Caltrans figures.1326 2.The City's highway VMT was calculated by using GIS to find the portion of highway road segments in unincorporated County land and multiplying it by total County highway VMT 1 On-Road Community VMT Diesel 9,985 30 1459 10,025 5.7 136,950 Gasoline 49,736 3,847 5,972 51054 29.0 732,076 Subtotal 1 On-Road Communh 59 721 3,876 7 431 61 079 347 869,026 Source(s): 1 Emissions factors for gas and diesel per vehicle class provided by EMFAC 2007 v2.3 run by Tom Scheffelin,California Air Resources Board Planning and Technical Support Division,Tscheffe@arb.ca.gov Manipulated by Jaime Hill,PMC, jhill@PMCworld.com to convert EMFAC vehicle classes to those used in CACP Notes. 1 Diesel Heavy Duty Vehicles includes Transit Buses,based on a weighted average of Trucks representing 98 7%of the category and Transit Buses representing 3.3%. 2. Gasoline Passenger Vehicles includes Motorcycles,based on a weighted average of Passenger Vehicles representing This report has been generated for San Luis Obsipo APCD CA using ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software. *r' 169 4/6/2010 Page 4 Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005 Detailed Report CO2 N2O CH Equiv CO2 Energy (tonnes) (kg) (kg) (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) 98 7%of the category and Motorcycles representing 1.3%. Subtotal Transportation 105,827 6,792 13,837 108,223 614 1,540,285 Waste San Luis Obsipo APCD,CA 3 Community Solid Waste Chicago Grade Disposal Method Managed Landfill Paper Products 0 0 241,287 5,067 2.9 Food Waste 0 0 94,629 1 987 1 1 Plant Debris 0 0 25,393 533 0.3 Wood or Textiles 0 0 70,890 1 489 0.8 Subtotal 3 Community Solid W 0 0 432,198 9 076 5.2 1 Total waste tonnage for the City in 2005 provided by the 2005 Disposal Quarterly Reports prepared by San Luis Obispo County Integrated Waste Management Authority on 6/17/05,9/27/05, 12/27/05 and 3/6/06,provided by Peter Cron,peron@iwma.com. 2.Percentages of waste share by type for landfill tonnage provided by CIWMB 2004 Statewide Waste Characterization Study http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/Publications/default.asp?pubid=l 097 3.Chicago Grade landfill reports a methane recovery factor of 60%.Chicago Grade total gas generated= 157 47 mmcf/yr Total gas transferred= 94 48 mmcf/yr 4 Cold Canyon landfill reports a methane recovery factor of 60%.Cold Canyon total gas generated=700 mmcf/yr Total gas transferred=400 mmcf/yr Notes: 1 Waste Type data not collected by landfill.State average waste characterization data is used for residential,commercial,and self haul waste. 3 Community Solid Waste Cold Canyon Disposal Method Managed Landfill Paper Products 0 0 199 4 0.0 Food Waste 0 0 78 2 0.0 Plant Debris 0 0 21 0 00 Wood or Textiles 0 0 59 1 0.0 Subtotal 3 Community Solid W 0 0 357 7 0.0 Source(s): 1 Total aste tonnage for the City in 2005 provided by the 2005 Disposal Quarterly Reports prepared by San Luis Obispo County Integrated Waste Management Authority on 6/17/05,9/27/05, 12/27/05 and 3/6/06,provided by Peter Cron,peron@iwma.com. 2.Percentages of waste share by type for landfill tonnage provided by CIW MB 2004 Statewide Waste Characterization Study http://www ciwmb.ca.gov/Publications/default.asp?pubid=1097 3 Chicago Grade landfill reports a methane recovery factor of 60% Chicago Grade total gas generated= 157 47 mmcf/yr Total gas transferred= 94 48 mmcf/yr This report has been generated for San Luis Obsipo APCD CA using ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software. 'rltl� 170 4/6/2010 Page 5 Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005 Detailed Report CO2 N 2 0 CH Equiv CO2 Energy (tonnes) (kg) (kg) (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) 4 Cold Canyon landfill reports a methane recovery factor of 60%.Cold Canyon total gas generated=700 mmcf/yr Total gas transferred=400 mmcf/yr Notes: 1 Waste Type data not collected by landfill.State average waste characterization data is used for residential,commercial,and self haul waste. Subtotal Waste 0 0 432,555 9 084 5.2 Other San Luis Obsipo APCD,CA 1 Agricultural Equipment Carbon Dioxide 147 0 0 147 0.1 Methane 0 0 30 1 0.0 Nitrous Oxide 0 2 0 1 0.0 Subtotal 1 Agricultural EWipm 147 2 30 148 0.1 Source(s)- I CO2,CH4 and N20 emissions calculated using the California Air Resources Board OFFROAD2007 modeling tool. 2.The portion of agricultural land per jurisdiction in SLO County calculated by John DeMartino,PMC, icteiTiartinoia,PMC"world com<Tnailto:jdernartino(a%I'MCworld.cotTiI using County GIS shape files. Notes I OFFROAD aggregates off-road agricultural equipment emissions for the entire county Emissions were separated by jurisdiction based on the proportion of agricultural land per jurisdiction.This analysis was completed sing GIS shapefiles of land use patterns in the county 2. OFFROAD includes the following agricultural equipment:2-wheel tractors,agricultural mowers,agricultural tractors, balers,combines,hydro power units,other agricultural equipment,sprayers,swathers and tillers. Subtotal Other 147 2 30 148 0.1 Total 164,276 7,999 451,399 176,235 100.0 2,538,652 This report has been generated for San Luis Obsipo APCD CA using ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software. ` Ili►' 171 *41olf: APPENDIX B: CACP DETAILED REPORT FOR CITY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS EMISSIONS, 2005 "err 173 4/6/2010 Page 1 Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005 Detailed Report CO2 N2O CH Equiv CO2 Energy Cost (tonnes) (kg) (kg) (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) ($) Buildings and Facilities San Luis Obsipo APCD,CA 1&2 6109 ECR Ste.B Electricity 1 0 0 1 0.0 11 506 Natural Gas 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 39 Subtotal 1&2 6109 ECR Ste. 1 0 0 1 0.0 12 545 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com).Natural gas data retrieved from The Gas Company billing statements.Billing statements were provided by the Finance Department Richelle Rickard(805-470-3428). 1&2 C/W Dance Hall Electricity 35 1 2 36 0.9 543 24 435 Natural Gas 4 0 0 4 01 74 1,029 Subtotal 1&2 C/W Dance Hal 39 1 3 40 1.0 618 25,464 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com).Natural gas data retrieved from The Gas Company billing statements.Billing statements were provided by the Finance Department Richelle Rickard(805-470-3428). 1&2 City Hall(6901 ECR Ste.A) Electricity 11 0 1 12 0.3 176 6,865 Natural Gas 4 0 0 4 0.1 75 896 Subtotal 1&2 City Hall(6901 15 0 1 16 0.4 251 7 761 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com).Natural gas data retrieved from The Gas Company billing statements.Billing statements were provided by the Finance Department Richelle Rickard(805-470-3428). 1&2 City Hall(on Palma) Electricity 3 0 0 3 0.1 41 2,343 Natural Gas 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 120 Subtotal 1&2 City Hall(on Pa 3 0 0 3 0.1 41 2,463 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com).Natural gas data retrieved from The Gas Company billing statements.Billing statements were provided by the Finance Department Richelle Rickard(805-470-3428). 1&2 Fire Dept#1 Electricity 9 0 1 9 0.2 136 5,149 Natural Gas 6 0 1 6 0.1 115 1 497 Subtotal 1&2 Fire Dept#1 15 0 1 15 04 251 6,646 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com).Natural gas data retrieved from The Gas Company billing statements.Billing statements were provided by the Finance Department Richelle Rickard(805-470-3428). This report has been generated for San Luis Obsipo APCD CA using ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software. 175 4/6/2010 Page 2 Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005 Detailed Report CO2 N2O CH Equiv CO2 Energy Cost (tonnes) (kg) (kg) (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) ($) 1&2 Fire Station#2 Electricity 5 0 0 5 0.1 70 2,721 Natural Gas 7 0 1 7 0.2 131 1 709 Subtotal 1 &2 Fin:Station#2 11 0 1 12 0.3 201 4 430 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com).Natural gas data retrieved from The Gas Company billing statements.Billing statements were provided by the Finance Department Richelle Rickard(805-470-3428). 1&2 Multi-Purpose Building @ Zoo Electricity 11 0 1 11 0.3 169 7 425 Natural Gas 17 0 2 17 0.4 325 3,693 Subtotal 1&2 Multi-Purpose E 28 1 3 28 0.7 494 11 118 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests @pge.com).Natural gas data retrieved from The Gas Company billing statements.Billing statements were provided by the Finance Department Richelle Rickard(805-470-3428). 1&2 Police Station Electricity 52 1 3 52 1.3 798 32,225 Natural Gas 18 0 2 18 04 333 3,791 Subtotal 1&2 Police Station 70 2 5 70 17 1 131 36,016 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com).Natural gas data retrieved from The Gas Company billing statements.Billing statements were provided by the Finance Department Richelle Rickard(805-470-3428). 1&2 Rec Center Electricity 2 0 0 2 0.0 26 1768 Natural Gas 1 0 0 1 0.0 20 356 Subtotal 1 &2 Rec Center 3 0 0 3 0.1 47 2,124 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com).Natural gas data retrieved from The Gas Company billing statements.Billing statements were provided by the Finance Department Richelle Rickard(805-470-3428). 1&2 Recreation Hall Electricity 18 0 1 18 0.4 277 10,365 Natural Gas 9 0 1 9 0.2 161 2,023 Subtotal 1&2 Recreation Hall 27 1 2 27 0.6 438 12,388 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com).Natural gas data retrieved from The Gas Company billing statements.Billing statements were provided by the Finance Department Richelle Rickard(805-470-3428). This report has been generated for San Luis Obsipo APCD CA using ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software. v 176 4/6/2010 Page 3 Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005 Detailed Report CO2 N 2 0 CH Equiv CO2 Energy Cost (tonnes) (kg) (kg) (tonnes) (%) (MM Btu) ($) 1&2 Yard-Dar Garage Electricity 2 0 0 2 0.0 29 1,344 Natural Gas 0 0 0 0 0.0 4 170 Subtotal 1&2 Yard-Dar Garay 2 0 0 2 0.1 33 1,515 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com).Natural gas data retrieved from The Gas Company billing statements.Billing statements were provided by the Finance Department Richelle Rickard(805-470-3428). 19401 Marchant Natural Gas 2 0 0 2 0.0 30 470 Subtotal 19401 Marchant 2 0 0 2 0.0 30 470 Natural gas data retrieved from The Gas Company billing statements.Billing statements were provided by the Finance Department Richelle Rickard (805-470-3428). 2 Zoo&Parking Lot Electricity 18 0 1 18 04 270 9,117 Subtotal 2 Zoo&Parking Lot 18 0 1 18 0.4 270 9,117 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 BBQ Area Electricity 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 100 Subtotal 2 BBQ Area 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 100 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Chalk Mountain Repeater Electricity 0 0 0 0 0.0 6 352 Subtotal 2 Chalk Mountain Rel 0 0 0 0 0.0 6 352 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests @pge.com). 2 City Park Electricity 10 0 1 10 0.2 147 5,407 Subtotal 2 City Park 10 0 1 10 0.2 147 5,407 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 City Rec Office Electricity 2 0 0 2 01 36 1,686 Subtotal 2 City Rec Office 2 0 0 2 0.1 36 1 686 This report has been generated for San Luis Obsipo APCD CA using ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software. I%W 177 4/6/2010 Page 4 Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005 Detailed Report CO2 N2O CH Equiv CO2 Energy Cost (tonnes) (kg) (kg) (tonnes) (%) (MM Btu) ($) Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests @pge.com). 2 El Camino Real&Traffic Way Electricity 1 0 0 1 0.0 12 620 Subtotal 2 El Camino Real&7 1 0 0 1 00 12 620 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Horse Arena @ Paloma Park Electricity 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 128 Subtotal 2 Horse Arena @ Pal, 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 128 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Marchant Avenue Electricity 4 0 0 4 0.1 65 2,944 Subtotal 2 Marchant Avenue 4 0 0 4 01 65 2,944 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Reptile Cage r1 Electricity 6 0 0 6 0.1 86 3,336 Subtotal 2 Reptile Cage 6 0 0 6 01 86 3,336 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Restrooms @ Lake Park Electricity 1 0 0 1 00 10 526 Subtotal 2 Restrooms @ Lake 1 0 0 1 0.0 10 526 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Restrooms @ Traffic Way Park Electricity 2 0 0 2 0.1 37 1728 Subtotal 2 Restrooms @ Traffi 2 0 0 2 01 37 1 728 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 San Marcos Road Repeater Electricity 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 115 Subtotal 2 San Marcos Road f 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 115 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). This report has been generated for San Luis Obsipo APCD CA using ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software. 178 4/6/2010 Page 5 Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005 Detailed Report CO2 N2O CH Equiv CO2 Energy Cost (tonnes) (kg) (kg) (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) ($) 2 Santa Rosa Road 500F Electricity 2 0 0 2 00 24 1,370 Subtotal 2 Santa Rosa Road 5 2 0 0 2 0.0 24 1,370 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Serena Court Electricity 1 0 0 1 0.0 20 876 Subtotal 2 Serena Court 1 0 0 1 0.0 20 876 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Shop Storage Bldg Electricity 0 0 0 0 0.0 5 242 Subtotal 2 Shop Storage Bldg 0 0 0 0 0.0 5 242 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Sports Fields @ Portola I%W Electricity 2 0 0 2 0.1 37 1,508 Subtotal 2 Sports Fields @ Po, 2 0 0 2 0.1 37 1,508 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Sports Fields @ Traffic Way Electricity 48 1 3 48 1.2 735 31,687 Natural Gas 0 0 0 0 00 4 169 Subtotal 2 Sports Fields @ Trz 48 1 3 48 1.2 739 31,856 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Sunken Gardens Electricity 1 0 0 1 0.0 13 512 Subtotal 2 Sunken Gardens 1 0 0 1 0.0 13 512 Electricity data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). Subtotal Buildings and Facilities 313 7 22 316 77 5,055 173,364 This report has been generated for San Luis Obsipo APCD CA using ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software. 140W 179 4/6/2010 Page 6 Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005 Detailed Report CO2 N 2 0 CH Equiv CO2 Energy Cost (tonnes) (kg) (kg) (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) (S) Streetlights&Traffic Signals San Luis Obsipo APCD,CA 2 Streetlights 9315 Pismo Ave(4 Lights) Electricity 0 0 0 0 0.0 7 435 Subtotal 2 Streetlights 93151 0 0 0 0 0.0 7 435 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Streetlights East Mall(150 Lights) Electricity 15 0 1 15 04 234 17,930 Subtotal 2 Streetlights East A 15 0 1 15 04 234 17,930 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Streetlights ECR&East Mall(46 Lights) Electricity 4 0 0 4 01 64 6,451 Subtotal 2 Streetlights ECR 6 4 0 0 4 01 64 6,451 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Streetlights Service ID#4949700002(6 Lights) Electricity 1 0 0 1 0.0 14 919 Subtotal 2 Streetlights Servic 1 0 0 1 0.0 14 919 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Streetlights Service ID#4949700022(30 Lights) Electricity 6 0 0 6 01 93 6,401 Subtotal 2 Streetlights Servic 6 0 0 6 0.1 93 6,401 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Streetlights Service ID#4949700026(6 Lights) Electricity 1 0 0 1 0.0 19 1,666 Subtotal 2 Streetlights Servic 1 0 0 1 00 19 1,666 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Streetlights Service ID#4949700028(43 Lights) Electricity 4 0 0 4 01 63 8,514 Subtotal 2 Streetlights Servic 4 0 0 4 01 63 8,514 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). This report has been generated for San Luis Obsipo APCD CA using ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software. v411111111� 180 4/6/2010 Page 7 Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005 Detailed Report CO2 N2O CH Equiv CO2 Energy Cost (tonnes) (kg) (kg) (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) ($) 2 Streetlights Service ID#4949700032(2 Lights) Electricity 0 0 0 0 00 5 153 Subtotal 2 Streetlights Servic 0 0 0 0 00 5 153 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Streetlights Service ID#494970008(2 Lights) Electricity 0 0 0 0 0.0 2 282 Subtotal 2 Streetlights Servic 0 0 0 0 0.0 2 282 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Traffic Signal Curbaril&ECR Electricity 1 0 0 1 0.0 15 650 Subtotal 2 Traffic Signal Curt 1 0 0 1 0.0 15 650 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Traffic Signal Del Rio Rd. &ECR Electricity 2 0 0 2 00 28 1 152 Subtotal 2 Traffic Signal Del I 2 0 0 2 0.0 28 1 152 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Traffic Signal HWY 41&NWC West Mall Electricity 0 0 0 0 00 7 383 Subtotal 2 Traffic Signal HW 0 0 0 0 0.0 7 383 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Traffic Signal Junipero&ECR Electricity 1 0 0 1 00 10 110 Subtotal 2 Traffic Signal Junii 1 0 0 1 0.0 10 110 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Traffic Signal Palomar&ECR Electricity 1 0 0 1 0.0 9 424 Subtotal 2 Traffic Signal Palo 1 0 0 1 0.0 9 424 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). This report has been generated for San Luis Obsipo APCD CA using ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software. 181 4/6/2010 Page 8 Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005 Detailed Report CO2 N2O CH Equiv CO2 Energy Cost (tonnes) (kg) (kg) (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) ($) 2 Traffic Signal San Anse/mo&ECR Electricity 1 0 0 1 0.0 10 463 Subtotal 2 Traffic Signal San 1 0 0 1 00 10 463 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Traffic Signal Santa Rosa&ECR Electricity 1 0 0 1 0.0 12 567 Subtotal 2 Traffic Signal Sanl 1 0 0 1 00 12 567 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Traffic Signal State Hospital&ECR Electricity 1 0 0 1 0.0 10 481 Subtotal 2 Traffic Signal Stat, 1 0 0 1 0.0 10 481 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Traffic Signal Traffic&ECR Electricity 1 0 0 1 0.0 13 598 " Subtotal 2 Traffic Signal Trafl 1 0 0 1 0.0 13 598 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). Subtotal Streetlights&Traffic Si 40 1 2 40 1.0 613 47,579 Water Delivery Facilities San Luis Obsipo APCD,CA 2 Aeration System @ Lake Park Electricity 0 0 0 0 0.0 3 292 Subtotal 2 Aeration System @ 0 0 0 0 0.0 3 292 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Irrigation Control#1 Electricity 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 152 Subtotal 2 Irrigation Control#1 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 152 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com).Service ID#4949700200 This report has been generated for San Luis Obsipo APCD CA using ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software. 182 4/6/2010 Page 9 Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005 Detailed Report CO2 N2O CH Equiv CO2 Energy Cost (tonnes) (kg) (kg) (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) ($) 2 Irrigation Control#2 Electricity 0 0 0 0 00 4 241 Subtotal 2 Irrigation Control#2 0 0 0 0 0.0 4 241 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com).Service IN 4949700085 2 Irrigation Control#3 Electricity 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 89 Subtotal 2 Irrigation Control#3 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 89 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com).Service ID#4949700080 2 Lake Aeration System Electricity 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 87 Subtotal 2 Lake Aeration Syste 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 87 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Water Fountain Pump Electricity 0 0 0 0 00 2 117 Subtotal 2 Water Fountain Pur 0 0 0 0 0.0 2 117 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). Subtotal Water Delivery Facilities 1 0 0 1 0.0 10 978 Wastewater Facilities San Luis Obsipo APCD,CA 2 Lift Station#1 Electricity 2 0 0 2 01 32 1,378 Subtotal 2 Lift Station#1 2 0 0 2 0.1 32 1,378 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com).Service IN 4949700205 2 Sewer Lift Electricity 22 0 1 22 0.5 340 15,039 Subtotal 2 Sewer Lift 22 0 1 22 0.5 340 15,039 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com).Service IN 4949700095 This report has been generated for San Luis Obsipo APCD CA using ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software. 183 4/6/2010 Page 10 Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005 Detailed Report CO2 N2O CH Equiv CO2 Energy Cost (tonnes) (kg) (kg) (tonnes) (%) (MM Btu) ($) 2 Sewer Lift#12 Electricity 5 0 0 5 0.1 74 3,326 Subtotal 2 Sewer Lift#12 5 0 0 5 01 74 3,326 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com). 2 Sewer Lift Pump Electricity 0 0 0 0 0.0 5 351 Subtotal 2 Sewer Lift Pump 0 0 0 0 0.0 5 351 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com).Service ID#4949700145 2 Sewer Lift Pump#2 Electricity 0 0 0 0 0.0 3 266 Subtotal 2 Sewer Lift Pump#2 0 0 0 0 0.0 3 266 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com).Service ID#4949700215 2 Sewer Lift Pump#3 Electricity 0 0 0 0 0.0 6 400 `'401111If Subtotal 2 Sewer Lift Pump#3 0 0 0 0 00 6 400 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com).Service ID#4949700100 2 Sewer Lift Pump#4 Electricity 6 0 0 6 0.1 94 4192 Subtotal 2 Sewer Lift Pump#4 6 0 0 6 0.1 94 4 192 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com).Service ID#4949700180 2 Sewer Lift Station Electricity 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 130 Subtotal 2 Sewer Lift Station 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 130 Data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com).Service ID#4949700190 2 Wastewater Treatment Plant Electricity 226 5 13 228 5.5 3 478 116,941 Methane 0 0 126,500 2,657 644 0 0 Subtotal 2 Wastewater Treatm 226 5 126,513 2,884 69.9 3 478 116,941 Electricity consumption data recieved from PG&E(ghgdatarequests@pge.com).Methane data was calculated using amount of BOD5 removed from the wastewater treatment process in kg per day and the percent of BODS removed at the end of the treatment process.This data was provided by This report has been generated for San Luis Obsipo APCD CA using ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software. v� 184 4/6/2010 Page 11 *40* Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005 Detailed Report CO2 N2O CH4 Equiv CO2 Energy Cost (tonnes) (kg) (kg) (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) ($) Justin Black,Public Works Department(805)470-3132,and entered into ICLEI's Wastewater Calculator to calculate tonnes of CH4 released per year Tonnes of CH4 was entered into CACP for total CO2e. Subtotal Wastewater Facilities 262 6 126,516 2,921 70.8 4,033 142,024 Solid Waste Facilities San Luis Obsipo APCD,CA 3 All Facilities Carbon Dioxide 49 0 0 49 1.2 0 0 Subtotal 3 All Facilities 49 0 0 49 1.2 0 0 Data provided by Mike LaBarbera(805.466.3636)at Atascadero Waste Alternatives. Subtotal Solid Waste Facilities 49 0 0 49 1.2 0 0 Vehicle Fleet San Luis Obsipo APCD,CA 1 ComDev Gasoline 14 1 1 14 0.3 207 4,250 Subtotal 1 ComDev 14 1 1 14 0.3 207 4,250 All vehicle fuel consumption records provided by the Finance Department.Records consisted of gas card billing statements.Gas cards are maintained by individual Departments.Community Development assigned gas cards to specific vehicles.This information was provided by Annette Manier Community Development Department,(805-470-3470).Light Trucks MY 1999 includes 2 Ford Rangers.Light Trucks MY 2004 includes 1 Ford Explorer 1 Fire Dept. Diesel 60 0 0 60 1.5 829 14,537 Gasoline 12 1 1 12 0.3 172 2,298 Subtotal 1 Fire Dept. 72 1 1 72 1.8 1,001 16,835 All vehicle fuel consumption records provided by the Finance Department.Records consisted of gas card billing statements.Gas cards are maintained by individual Departments.Fire Department assigned gas cards to specific vehicles;however the fleet has changed since 2005 and it was difficult to match present card information with specific vehicles in 2005.It was assumed all diesel consumption was by firetrucks and unleaded gasoline by the remaining fleet vehicles.Unleaded gasoline was distributed evenly between the six vehicles.Gas card information was provided by Ellen Perkins,Fire Department,(805-470-3300).Diesel Heavy-Duty Vehicles(All MY)includes Vehicle Numbers 501 502,503,507 and 574 Light Trucks MY 19987 to 1993 includes 2 Chevy Blazers. Light Trucks MY 2001 includes 2 Ford F250 Light Trucks MY 2004 includes 1 Chevy Tahoe Fire Command Vehicle. 1 Parks Gasoline 23 3 2 24 0.6 342 0 Subtotal 1 Parks 23 3 2 24 0.6 342 0 All vehicle fuel consumption records provided by the Finance Department.Records consisted of gas card billing statements.Gas cards are This report has been generated for San Luis Obsipo APCD CA using ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software. VOW 185 4/6/2010 Page 12 Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005 Detailed Report CO2 N2O CH Equiv CO2 Energy Cost (tonnes) (kg) (kg) (tonnes) (%) (MM Btu) ($) maintained by individual Departments.Light Trucks MY 1987 to 1993 includes 1 1980 Cushman Scooter 1 1986 Ford Ranger 1 1980 Chevy Truck, 1 1990 GMC Truck.Heavy Duty Vihicles MY 2002 includes 1-2002 Dodge Truck 3/4 Ton dump bed. 1 Police Department Diesel 1 0 0 1 0.0 11 0 Gasoline 130 7 6 132 3.2 1,910 0 Subtotal 1 Police Department 131 7 6 133 3.2 1,922 0 All vehicle gas consumption data provided by Terry Buckley Police Department(ext.3258).The Police Department tracks vehicle fuel consumption. Police Department personnel use government credit cards in addition to assigned gas cards to purchase fuel.These purchases do not show up in the gas card billing statements provided by the Finance Department. Unleaded gasoline was distributed evenly between the 23 vehicles.Passenger Cars MY 2005 includes 3 Ford Crown Victoria and 1 BMW Motorcycle.Passenger Cars MY 2004 includes 1 Ford Crown Victoria.Passenger Cars MY 2003 includes 1 Ford Crown Victoria and 1 Dodge Intrepid.Passenger Cars MY 1999 includes 2 Ford Crown Victoria and 1 Ford Taurus.Passenger Cars MY 2001 includes 3 Ford Crown Victoria.Passenger Cars MY 2000 includes 2 Ford Crown Victoria.Passenger Cars MY 1998 includes 1 Ford Taurus.Passenger Cars MY 1997 includes 2 Dodge Intrepid.Passenger Cars MY 1995 includes 2 Ford Crown Victoria. Passenger Cars MY 1984 to 1993 includes 1 1955 Chevy Light Trucks MY 2004 includes 1 Ford Expedition.Light Trucks MY 1987 1993 includes 1 1989 Jeep.Diesel Heavy-Duty Vehicles includes 1 1981 Chevy Bus. 1 PW Building Maintenance Gasoline 6 1 0 7 0.2 94 1,827 Subtotal 1 PW Building Mainte 6 1 0 7 0.2 94 1,827 All vehicle fuel consumption records provided by the Finance Department.Records consisted of gas card billing statements.Gas cards are maintained by individual Departments.Unleaded gasoline was distributed evenly between the three vehicles.Light Trucks MY 2002 includes 1 Ford F150 Light Trucks MY 1987 to 1993 includes 1 Chevrolet(C-11). 1 PW Operations Gasoline 1 0 0 1 0.0 11 319 Subtotal 1 PW Operations 1 0 0 1 0.0 11 319 All vehicle fuel consumption records provided by the Finance Department.Records consisted of gas card billing statements.Gas cards are maintained by individual Departments.Light Trucks MY 2005 includes 1 Ford Explorer 1 PW Streets Gasoline 6 0 1 6 01 88 1,922 Subtotal 1 PW Streets 6 0 1 6 0.1 88 1,922 All vehicle fuel consumption records provided by the Finance Department.Records consisted of gas card billing statements.Gas cards are maintained by individual Departments.Unleaded gasoline is evenly distributed between the nine vehicles within the fleet.Heavy Duty Vehicles MY 1985 to 1986 includes 1 1980 3/4 Ton Chevy Utility Truck, 1 1981 5 YD Ford Dump Truck,1 1982 5 YD Ford Dump Truck,and 1 1984 1 Ton Chevy Service Truck. Heavy Duty Vehicles MY 1990 to 1995 includes 1 1990 GMC 1 Ton Service Truck.Light Trucks MY 1987 to 1993 includes 1 1973 Chevy 1/2 Ton, 1 1989 1/2 Ton Chevy Pick-up and 1 1990 1/2 Ton GMC Pick-up.Light Trucks MY 2002 includes 1 1/2 Ton Dodge Pick- up. This report has been generated for San Luis Obsipo APCD CA using ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software. 186 4/6/2010 Page 13 Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005 Detailed Report CO2 N2O CH Equiv CO2 Energy Cost (tonnes) (kg) (kg) (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) ($) 1 Wastewater Diesel 125 0 0 125 3.0 1717 0 Gasoline 12 1 1 12 0.3 178 0 Subtotal Wastewater 137 1 1 138 3.3 1,894 0 All vehicle fuel consumption records provided by the Finance Department.Records consisted of gas card billing statements.Gas cards are maintained by individual Departments.Diesel fuel was distrubeted evenly between the Front End Case Loader and Aquatech Sewer Jet Truck. Unleaded gasoline was distributed evenly between the remainder of the fleet.Diesel Heavy Duty Trucks All MY includes 1-Front End Case Loader and 1 Aquatech Sewer Jet Truck.Light Trucks MY 1987 to 1993 includes 1 1984 Chevy truck and 1 1992 GMC medium duty with crane.Light Trucks MY 1999 includes 1 Ford F250 Heavy Duty Vehicles MY 2003 includes 1 Ford F550 Super Duty Light Trucks MY 2003 includes 1 Dodge Ram 1 Zoo Gasoline 8 1 1 8 0.2 113 2,302 Subtotal 1 Zoo 8 1 1 8 0.2 113 2,302 All vehicle fuel consumption records provided by the Finance Department.Records consisted of gas card billing statements.Gas cards are maintained by individual Departments.Unleaded gasoline was distributed evenly between the four vehicles.Light Trucks MY 1987 to 1993 includes 1 1979 Chevy Luv 4x4 1 1985 Dodge Sedan, 1 1990 Chevy S-10,and 1 Isuzu Trooper Subtotal Vehicle Fleet 398 15 13 403 9.8 5,672 27 456 Employee Commute San Luis Obsipo APCD,CA 1 Employee Commute Diesel 48 0 1 48 1.2 652 0 Gasoline 134 10 15 137 3.3 1,969 0 Subtotal 1 Employee Commuti 181 10 16 185 4.5 2,621 0 Passenger Cars Alt.Method includes motorcycles. Subtotal Employee Commute 181 10 16 185 4.5 2,621 0 Transit Fleet San Luis Obsipo APCD,CA 1 Dail-A-Ride Gasoline 116 8 3 119 2.9 1712 26,725 Subtotal 1 Dail-A-Ride 116 8 3 119 2.9 1 712 26,725 All vehicle fuel consumption records provided by the Finance Department.Records consisted of gas card billing statements.Gas cards are maintained by individual Departments.Transit Fleet information was provided by Amanda Muether Dispatch,(805)XXX-XXXX.Heavy Duty Vehicles MY 2002 includes 1 Chapion Type III Bus.Heavy Duty Vehicles MY 2005 includes 1 Eldorado Aerotech Bus.Heavy Duty Vehicles MY 2003 includes 2 Ford Type III Bus.Heavy Duty Vehicles MY 2000 includes 1 Eldorado Champion Bus This report has been generated for San Luis Obsipo APCD CA using ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software. 187 4/6/2010 Page 14 Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005 Detailed Report CO2 N 2 0 CH Equiv CO2 Energy Cost (tonnes) (kg) (kg) (tonnes) (%) (MMBtu) ($) 1 North County Shuttle(Fixed Route) Gasoline 92 7 3 95 2.3 1,361 26,950 Subtotal l North County Shuttl 92 7 3 95 2.3 1,361 26,950 All vehicle fuel consumption records provided by the Finance Department.Records consisted of gas card billing statements.Gas cards are maintained by individual Departments.Transit Fleet information was provided by Amanda Muether Dispatch,(805)461 5000 Heavy Duty Vehicles MY 2003 includes 1 Ford Type III Bus with Graphics. Subtotal Transit Fleet 209 14 6 213 5.2 3,073 53,675 Total 1453 54 126,575 4128 100.0 21,076 445,076 "VIII This report has been generated for San Luis Obsipo APCD CA using ICLEI's Clean Air and Climate Protection 2009 Software. 188 vmwe APPENDIX C: DETAILED METHODOLOGY FOR COMMUNITY-WIDE INVENTORY `fir 189 APPENDIX C: DETAILED METHODOLOGY FOR COMMUNITY-WIDEINVENTORY Detailed Methodology for Community-Wide Inventory The following is a detailed explanation of data sources and methodology for calculating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in each sector of the community-wide analysis The purpose of this appendix is to provide transparency of this Inventory, outline data limitations and give guidance for future City inventories to maintain methodological consistency ELECTRICITY AND NATURAL GAS Note. We attempted to collect energy production/consumption data besides that from natural gas and electricity such as propane solar, and wind however the data was not available in the level of detail necessary to meet the protocol for this Inventory Residential Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) and Southern California Gas Company (SoCal Gas Co ) provided residential electricity and natural gas consumption data. Specifically, data was provided by • John Bohman, Analyst with PG&E Green Communities and Innovator Pilots (izbx(a�pge.com) • Colby Morrow Southern California Gas Company & San Diego Gas and Electric Company Air Quality Manager Customer Programs Environmental Affairs (cl morrow@semprautilities.com) The raw data received from PG&E and SoCal Gas Co is summarized in the chart below This raw data was inputted into the CACP2009 software in kWh and therms. CACP2009 Average Grid Electricity RCI Average, and Fuel CO2 coefficient sets were amended per PG&E and State guidance (see 'electricity and natural gas coefficients section) TABLE 1: RESIDENTIAL ENERGY USE 01 3 i PG&E Electricity 2 71 063 501 kWh 15 892 [, Ak Eyk City of Atascadero '-•- 191 APPENDIX C: DETAILED METHODOLOGY FOR COMMUNITY-WIDEINVENTORY Commercial/industrial Commercial and industrial electricity were combined into one section by PG&E due to the California 15/15 Rule The 15/15 Rule was adopted by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) in the Direct Access Proceeding (CPUC Decision 97-10-031) to protect customer confidentiality The 15/15 Rule requires that any aggregated information provided by the utilities must be made up of at least 15 customers. A single customer's load must be less than 15 percent of an assigned category If the number of customers in the complied data is below 15 or if a single customer's load is more than 15 percent of the total data, categories must be combined before the information is released The Rule further requires that if the 15/15 Rule is triggered for a second time after the data has been screened already using the 15/15 Rule, the customer must be dropped from the information provided As a result, PG&E aggregated commercial and industrial energy consumption in Atascadero into one report. SoCal Gas Co separated commercial and industrial gas usage (shown in the chart below) into two reports. It would have been misleading to present an 'Industrial' for only natural gas emissions therefore, the SoCal Gas Co emissions were aggregated with commercial as well. Data for this sector was provided by- • John Bohman Analyst with PG&E Green Communities and Innovator Pilots Ozbx@pge com) • Colby Morrow Southern California Gas Company & San Diego Gas and Electric Company Air Quality Manager Customer Programs Environmental Affairs (cimorrow@semprautilities.com) Raw data received from these sources is reflected in the table below CACP2009 Average Grid Electricity, RCI Average, and Fuel CO2 Coefficient Sets were amended to reflect California standards (See 'electricity and natural gas coefficients' section) •- City of Atascadero 192 APPENDIXDETAILED METHODOLOGY • • ■ INVENTORY COMMTABLE 2: ■ *40 lot � Pi 0 , m PG&E Commercial+ 2 59 802,016 kWh 13,374 Industrial Electricity t .,s8•r 6. daisy' ;,`. 1 r.E s7Q „ SoCal Gas Co Industrial 1 21 004 Therms 112 Natural Gas Electricity and Natural Gas Coefficients Electricity and natural gas coefficients are defaulted to national averages in the CACP2009 software To make the Inventory more accurate and representative of the city's real impact on climate change tailored coefficient sets for California were obtained Sources and coefficient values are summarized in the table below TABLE 3: PG&E COEFFICIENT SETS ---------------- w. - 7i .. 6 , Average Grid John Bohman, Analyst with PG&E Green Electricity Set Lbs/MWh 489 CO2 Communities and Innovator Pilots azbx@pge.com) " �11r' City ofAtascadero '..- 193 APPENDIX C: DETAILED METHODOLOGY FOR • • INVENTORY TABLE 4: SOCAL GAS CO COEFFICIENT -Calei[cliP1t~ "alu - Fuel CO2 Set kg/MMBtu 53 060 Coefficient set provided by CACP2009 #` �?±30"t 1ttetler tYu IOd 1i.; klr � �ii>Isatu Resieie ►a 4 9"C14' #� o al'04a 1 Cd> ; RCI Average Set- kg/MMBtu 0 001 N20 Coefficient set created by the CEC and provided Commercial 0 0059 CH4 by SoCal Gas Co R (- reragtM. ;. ;> .., iicsereitec TRANSPORTATION Community On-Road VMT Community on-road vehicle miles traveled (VMT) are miles traveled on locally maintained roads within the City of Paso Robles. State roads, highways, and interstate routes are not included in this calculation Local VMT data was obtained from the Caltrans Highway Performance Maintenance System (HPMS) 2005 Report. The raw data obtained from this report is reflected in the table below TABLE 5: CALTRANS HPIVIS DATA FOR SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, 2005 f @ R► II' fid,,i V, Arroyo Grande 0 5852 5852 1 0 199 7 199 70 Grover Beach 0 4087 4087 0 9881 9881 Cities: tt Paso Robles 655 112.82 11937 389 253.29 25719 64 San Luis Obispo 1 0 1 121 08 1 12108 0 44381 44381 • •- City ofAtascadero 194 APPENDIX DETAILED METHODOLOGY • COMMUNITY—WIDE INVENTORY io Fes. . State Highway 27841 8547 36388 2,432.14 2,84985 5,281 98 Other US Fish& 1919 0 1919 672 0 672 Wildlife Service n 9 qy a SAN LUIS OBISPO Total 1,445.22 901.63 2,342.71 3,214.95 4716.5 7,931.44 The rural and urban daily vehicle miles of travel (DVMT) were then converted to annual VMT by multiplying by 365 days/year The HPMS DVMT average includes lessened travel on weekends, Ir` which means this methodology is appropriate ADJUSTEDTABLE 6: CALTRANS HPMS DATA FOR • 2005 77 77 Arroyo Grande 72,890 500 Grover Beach 36 065 650 Paso Robles 93 847 350 San Luis Obispo 161 990 650 Total 961 347 950 �111r✓ City of Atascadero '-•- 195 APPENDIX C: DETAILED METHODOLOGY FOR COMMUNITY-WIDEINVENTORY Highway VMT Highway VMT are miles traveled on highways and interstate routes. Highway VMT data was also given in the Caltrans HPMS report; however it is aggregated by county rather than by city As such, we calculated the city's VMT by determining the portion of total highway road segments within the incorporated area This was done using Geographic Information Systems (GIS)to 'clip' a map of highway roads in the San Luis Obispo County by jurisdictional boundary The analysis concluded that 4.29% of total state and federal highways and roads are included in the city Using this as an indicator of VMT, we concluded that approximately 82.76 million VMT occurred in the city in 2005 This methodology of distributing VMT by road segment length is supported by ICLEI however it does assume constant levels of traffic along all roads within the county The levels of traffic along each road segment in each jurisdiction are unavailable, therefore this methodology is the best available at this time. This analysis includes the following State Routes. • US 101 • SR 41 JURISDICTION,TASLE 7: STATE HIGHWAY VMT PER 00 his" Im Arroyo Grande 43683 1.2147% 23 419 197 36 Grover Beach 0.9577 0.2663% 5 134 376 99 Paso Robles 106936 2.9737% 57,329 868.21 San Luis Obispo 110.3831 2.8873% 55,665 080 01 V rflhidtooi t ount 9, b Total 35961 999996% 1 927 915 122.74 -•- City ofAtascadero 196 APPENDIX C: DETAILED METHODOLOGY FOR COMMUNITY-WIDEINVENTORY Transportation Coefficients By default, the CACP 2009 software uses a national average distribution of vehicles by type (passenger vehicle, light truck, heavy truck, etc) national average fuel economies per vehicle type (miles per gallon), and national average emissions coefficients. In order to provide an accurate assessment of the emissions within the city we obtained county-specific emissions data from the California Air Resources Board EMissions FACtors (EMFAC) software The EMFAC2007 model calculates emission rates from all motor vehicles such as passenger cars to heavy-duty trucks, operating on highways, freeways and local roads in California. In the EMFAC model, the emission rates are multiplied with vehicle activity data provided by the regional transportation agencies to calculate the statewide or regional emission inventories. The EMFAC analysis was performed by the California Air Resources Board for San Luis Obispo County Specifically the data was provided by- Tom yTom Scheffelin, California Air Resources Board Planning and Technical Support Division, Tscheffe@arb.ca gov This data was then manipulated to fit the format of CACP2009 which uses different vehicle classification categories than EMFAC For instance, CACP2009 defines "heavy duty truck" as trucks with a gross vehicle weight of over 8 000 pounds, which includes EMFAC classifications for Light Heavy-Duty Trucks (LHDT) 1, LDHT 2, Medium Heavy-Duty Trucks (MHDT) and Heavy Heavy-Duty Trucks (HHDT) Additionally, CACP2009 does not include categories for transit buses or motorcycles. To account for these vehicle types the fuel efficiency for the Diesel Heavy Duty Vehicles was manipulated to include Transit Buses, based on a weighted average of Trucks representing 98 7% of the category and Transit Buses representing 3.3% Similarly the emission factors for Gasoline Passenger Cars was manipulated to include Motorcycles based on a weighted average of Passenger Vehicles representing 98 7% of the category and Motorcycles representing 1 3% For simplicity in re-running this analysis for future Inventories, tailored coefficients and VMT distributions were only applied to five vehicle types, which included the following EMFAC vehicle classifications. 1) Heavy truck: LHDT1, LHDT2, HHDT, OB MHDT 2) Light truck/SUV/Pickup: MDT 3) Passenger Vehicle Passenger Car, LDT1, LDT2 4) Transit Bus Urban Bus (UB) School Bus (SB) 5) Motorcycle Motorcycle (MC) City of Atascadero '-•- 197 APPENDIX C: DETAILED METHODOLOGY FOR COMMUNITY-WIDEINVENTORY For each of the five vehicle classes above, a weighted average was calculated using the EMFAC coefficients and their portion of total vehicle miles traveled WASTE The methane commitment method embedded in CACP2009 is based on the EPA's WAste Reduction Model (WARM) for calculating lifecycle emissions from waste generated within the jurisdictional boundary of the city in 2005 The analysis does not use the waste-in-place method which calculates emissions from all waste generated in 2005 and all waste already existing in the landfill before the baseline year The waste sector takes into account the waste sent to landfill from city residents, businesses, and institutions It does not calculate emissions from the total amount of waste sent to county landfills (Cold Canyon and Chicago Grade) in 2005 since those landfills accept waste from the unincorporated county and incorporated cities Solid waste tonnage data per jurisdiction was provided by• • "2005 Disposal Report" by quarter, prepared by the San Luis Obispo Integrated Waste Management Board on 3/6/06 Document provided by Peter Cron, San Luis Obispo County Integrated Waste Management Authority (peron@iwma.com) Since the composition of waste sent to landfill in 2005 is unknown for the city the following statewide average waste composition study was utilized • CIWMB 2004 Statewide Waste Characterization Study http.//www ciwmb ca.gov/Publications/default.asp?pubid=1097 The Waste Characterization Study's distribution of waste by type was then converted into the five categories included in the CACP2009 software which resulted in the following waste characterization • Paper Products. 20 5% • Wood/Textiles- 19.2% • Food Waste 12% • All other waste 39% • Plant Debris 9 3% The CACP2009 software does not have the ability to assign an individual methane recovery factor to each landfill; therefore, we took a weighted average (60%) based on the portion of -•- City of Atascadero 198 APPENDIX C: DETAILED METHODOLOGY FOR COMMUNITY-WIDEINVENTORY waste in each landfill. The methane recovery factors of the landfills are well documented by the San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control District based on the system operations at that time Table 8 includes methane recovery factors for the Chicago Grade and Cold Canyon landfills. COMMUNITYTABLE 8: . WASTE, 2005 40, ME WWWWSMM Data from Chicago Grade 60% 15747 9448 APCD 2005 31 097 Inventory u Other— Off-road agricultural equipment Off-road agricultural equipment emissions were calculated using the OFFROAD2007 modeling software developed by the California Air Resources Board. The tool calculates total emissions per off-road category per emission type (CH4, N20, CO2, etc) for the entire county, including incorporated and unincorporated areas. To separate the aggregate 2005 emissions outputs for off-road agricultural equipment in the city we used agriculture and crop GIS shape files provided by San Luis Obispo County These shape files were clipped with the jurisdictional boundaries within the county by PMC to yield the following results: *111r+ City of Atascadero '- - • 199 APPENDIX C: DETAILED METHODOLOGY FOR COMMUNITY-WIDEINVENTORY TABLE OFF-ROAD AG EMISSIONSJURISDICTION, 1 1 �l�b i /.�y� AM k 40 lil Arroyo Grande 36510 0 11% 00010 00164 799719 Ata 7402 A Grover Beach 28710 009% 00008 00129 628867AIM Paso Robles 2,51750 078% 00066 01134 5514356 q .... San Luis Obispo 311.20 010% 00008 00140 681655 Un Vin 'i 777 , : Total 322,608.20 10000% 08498 145283 70 664 4118 The OFFROAD software calculates emissions from other sources of off-road equipment as well including recreational vehicles and watercrafts, however, these emissions were not included because there was no feasible methodology for separating these emissions per jurisdiction within the county Population is proven to not be an accurate indicator of consumption rates. To remain consistent with protocol and practice emissions must be separated in a spatial manner similar to how highway emissions are determined by road segment length within each jurisdiction. It should also be noted that many location-sources of off-road emissions, such as recreational vehicle emissions, occur in State Parks or Beaches outside of the jurisdiction of each city or the county 2020 AND 2025 FORECAST The 2020 and 2025 forecasts calculate business-as-usual growth based on population job, and household growth rates. Employment and population baseline data was obtained from the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments report, "Long Range Socio-Economic Projections (Year 2030)" prepared by Economic Research Associates (ERA) in May 2006, Revised July 2006 Land identified as agricultural or open space uses provided by San Luis Obispo County City of Atascadero *420 200 APPENDIX C: DETAILED METHODOLOGY FOR COMMUNITY—WIDE • Employment and population projections were obtained from the May 2009 Revision Mid-range estimates of growth were used in both instances It should be noted that these forecasts do not take into consideration any planned or actual efficiency or conservation measures after 2005 For example the State Renewable Energy portfolio has advanced significantly since 2005 but the forecast calculates 2020 energy emissions by assuming constant emissions factors VOW City of Atascadero 201 APPENDIX D: DETAILED METHODOLOGY FOR CITY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS INVENTORY 203 APPENDIX i DETAILED METHODOLOGY • GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS INVENTORY Detailed Methodology for Government Operations GHG Emissions Inventory The detailed methodology for government operations is much less complex than the community-wide methodology explanation Since the government operations GHG emissions inventory is a facility-scale study, data records are much more reliable and consistent. In addition the Local Government Operations Protocol provides us a verified guide for calculating emissions in each sector BUILDING The building sector includes all emissions from natural gas and electricity consumed in City- owned and - operated facilities. The kWh of electricity and therms of natural gas were then entered into the CACP2009 software where they were converted to CO2e For a complete list of buildings included in this sector, please see the detailed CACP2009 report in Appendix B The building sector used the PG&E verified Average Grid Electricity Set and the CEC Emission Factor for Natural Gas RCI Average Set, as defined in Appendix C The analysis did not use the PG&E natural gas coefficient for the fuel CO2 set because natural gas comes entirely from the Southern California Gas Company VEHICLE FLEET The vehicle fleet sector includes gasoline and diesel vehicles from the following City departments: • Community Development • Police • Community Services • Public Works • Fire Gasoline and diesel consumption for calendar year 2005 was obtained from fuel billing statements provided by the Finance Department. The Police Department provided their own fuel usage data as there record keeping was more complete. Specific sources of data within each organization are outlined in the notes of Appendix B Ir' City of Atascadero 205 APPENDIX METHODOLOGY FOR GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS INVENTORY For the vehicle fleet, we used the County EMFAC coefficients for gasoline and diesel described in Appendix C These are weighted averages per multiple vehicle types in San Luis Obispo County EMPLOYEE COMMUTE Employees were surveyed in June 2009 using an online survey instrument. The questions, attached as Appendix E, asked employees about their current commuting patterns. Of those questions, we used the following for our analysis. • What is your approximate one-way distance to work (in miles)? Please indicate the most direct distance to work, discounting midway destinations that would be taken whether or not you drove to work each day (i a dropping off children at school) • Please indicate the type of transportation you take to work each day in your average work week. Please note that there are two types of carpooling O Drive alone O Public transit O Carpool with fellow City O Motorcycle employees O Bicycle O Carpool with drivers not employed by the City O Walk O Vanpool O Telecommute O Other • What type of vehicle do you drive? • What type of fuel does your vehicle use? • If you carpool with fellow City employees how many City employees ride with you? If you carpool with a different number each day please indicate the average. Approximately 69 employees responded to the survey with usable information meaning that all essential questions were answered Answers with mileage left blank or with highly inconsistent data (ex: saying they walked three days to work, biked two, and drove five) were omitted In -•- City ofAtascadero 206 APPENDIX D: DETAILED METHODOLOGY FOR GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS INVENTORY addition, if a respondent did not describe their 'other' category of transportation the entry was omitted To perform this analysis, we took the following steps. 1) Separate entries by what type of vehicle they own and operate (compact, midsize car full-size car, small truck, medium-small truck, large truck, motorcycle or don't drive") Within each new group, separate the entries by diesel gasoline or hybrid 2) For each group of entries with the same vehicle type and technology multiply the number of miles to work by 2 (to get round-trip estimate) and then by the number of drive alone' days for each entry Multiply the number of miles to work by the number of 'carpool' days (half of the 'drive alone' emissions) Note If a respondent entered that they motorcycle to work, but own a car as well, the motorcycle miles were moved to the motorcycle category) Adjust for hybrids (see below) 3) Add all miles per vehicle type and technology and multiply by 52 18 work weeks/year 4) Calculate the multiplier to adjust survey response data to the entire 2005 employee population In 2005, there were 128 employees. This, divided by the 69 survey entries, gives us our multiplier of 1 74 5) Multiply the mileage per vehicle per technology type by the multiplier 6) Divide the number of hybrid miles by three and add the difference to the 'passenger car' category This is to account for the large increase in hybrid sales between 2005 and 2009 (Source Hybridcars com sales statistics) 7) Manipulate the vehicle classes to fit the CACP2009 software categories 8) Enter final miles into the CACP2009 software per vehicle type and fuel 14AW •- City ofAtascadero 207 APPENDIX D: DETAILED METHODOLOGY • GOVERNMENTOPERATIONS INVENTORY TABLE11 • COMMUTE Light Trucks 56 197 86 Gasoline 107 536.92 Gasoline 31308 Diesel 6 645 64 Diesel � 3 3' " tt� / . w '�'� + 3/"�,r ✓ :o, o Fes+ �3 Passenger Vehicle 138 885 77 Gasoline 34 785 80 Gasoline a Total 306,62116 Gasoline 61017611 Gasoline 20 819 82 Diesel 41 43144 Diesel The CACP2009 software does not provide a method of calculating emissions from hybrid cars. As a result, these emissions were divided by 2.20 based on the difference between average fuel economy of a 2005 Toyota Prius and the average fuel economy included in the 2005 SLO EMFAC data and then entered into the CACP2009 software under 'passenger vehicle' (Source www fueleconomy gov) STREETLIGHTS The City's Finance Department provided billing information for the electricity used to operate City streetlights and traffic signals. The total kWh were entered into the CACP2009 software using the verified PG&E Average Grid Electricity Set outlined in Appendix C WATER/ SEWAGE This sector calculates emissions from energy consumption at City-owned and operated wastewater facilities and point-source emissions that arise due to fermentation of degraded biomass in the wastewater lagoons. The Finance Department provided the electricity consumption for each of the water facilities. Operational data provided by the Wastewater Treatment Plant Manager was utilized to determine total methane and nitrous oxide emissions using ICLEI's Wastewater Emissions Data tool. Both of these sources are outlined in Appendix City of Atascaderc -..- �ago 208 APPENDIX D: DETAILED METHODOLOGY FOR GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS INVENTORY B These totals were entered into the CACP2009 software with the PG&E Average Grid Electricity Set outlined in Appendix C WASTE Atascadero Waste Alternatives reported solid waste tonnage produced by City operations. The City produced 168 65 tons of waste in 2005 that was sent to managed landfill. The waste composition was unknown for the city; therefore the California averages provided by the 2004 California Integrated Waste Management Board Waste Characterization Report were used A weighted average methane recovery factor of 60% was used in this analysis, as outlined in Appendix C •..- City of Atascadero 209 APPENDIX E: CITY EMPLOYEE COMMUTE SURVEY, 2009 low 211 APPENDIX E: CITY EMPLOYEE COMMUTE City Employee Commute Survey, 2009 1) What is your approximate on-way distance to work (in miles)? Please indicate the most direct distance to work, discounting midway destinations that would be taken whether or not you drove to work each day (i e. dropping off children at school) 2) Please indicate the type of transportation you take to work each day in your average work week. Please note that there are two types of carpooling Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Drive Alone 0 El 0 0 Carpool with fellow City employees 0 [ 0LD Carpool with other drivers not Q', employed by the City Vanpool 0 0 0' 0' Public transit ED a 0 0 0 Motorcycle 0 0 0' 0' 0 Bicycle 0 0 0 0' 0' Walk 13 0 0 0 Telecommute 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0' 0 0', 0 l 3) What type of vehicle do you drive? El Compact/Sub-Compact car(Civic, Corolla, Focus, Neon Cavalier Jetta or similar) 0 Mid-size car(Accord, Camry Passat, Monte Carlo Sable, Sebring or similar) Full-size car(Impala, Intrepid Taurus, Crown Victoria, Bonneville,Town Car or similar) 0' Small Truck/SUV/Pickup(RAV4 Chev S10 Pickup (4 cylinder) PT Cruiser or similar) C] Medium-Small Truck/SUV/Pickup(Minivan, Sonoma Pickup Truck or similar) Medium-Large Truck/SUV/Pickup(Durango, Safari Cargo Van, Ford F150 or similar) [ ' Large Truck/SUV/Pickup(Suburban, Expedition Navigator Ford E250/350/450 or similar) 0 Motorcycle 0 1 don't drive alone or drive a carpool City of Atascadero '-•- 213 • EMPLOYEE COMMUTE SURVEY, 2008 otrii� 4) What type of fuel does your vehicle from question 3 use? 0 Gasoline E3 Diesel Biodiesel Hybrid Electric Q' I don't drive to work or drive a carpool Q Other(Specify) 5) If you carpool or vanpool with fellow City employees, home may City employees ride with you? If you carpool with a different number each day please indicate the average. If 'not applicable, please enter '0" Enter#of people r.rlll •- City of Atascadero 214 ITEM NUMBER. C -2 DATE 09/14/10 -i 19Y8'1 R 1978} � CADF�; Atascadero City Council Staff Report— Public Works Department Establishment of Speed Limits on Various City Streets RECOMMENDATIONS Council 1 Approve the 2010 Speed Zone Survey Update, dated July 2010, by TPG Consulting Group, Inc., and, 2 Adopt the attached Draft Resolution which formally establishes and/or modifies speed limits on various City streets *awl DISCUSSION The State of California Vehicle Code (CVC) requires that an Engineering and Traffic Survey be conducted every five years, with the survey's results being used to establish or adjust the posted speed limits on streets where radar would be used as an enforcement tool The surveys, conducted in conjunction with these report recommendations, were conducted in conformance with the CVC requirements The City retained TPG Consulting Inc., licensed traffic engineers to conduct a speed survey of 35 road segments in town The speed survey was conducted by using radar and an unmarked vehicle to chart the speed of vehicles in each direction The recorded speeds are calculated to determine the critical speed, that is, the speed at which 85% of the vehicles are traveling Once the critical speed is determined, by law the posted speed can be set and enforced within 5 miles per hour of this speed The California Department of Transportation Traffic Manual states, "In matching existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community, engineering judgment may indicate the need for a further reduction of five miles per hour " The factors considered in such a reduction are • Multiple unprotected crossings, • Residential / School Zone, Iftw • Limited sight distance - vertical / horizontal curvature, • Accident problems, 215 ITEM NUMBER. C -2 DATE 09/14/10 • Substandard cross-section, • Poor intersection spacing, • Poor driveway characteristics, and, • Unusually heavy pedestrian activity The City Engineer has determined that the following road segments qualify for either a modified speed limit from current posted limits, and / or the reduction in speed 85th Road Boundaries Posted Percent., Recommended Segment Speed Study Speed Speed Decreased Sneed Limit EI Camino Real San Diego Rd to Santa Barbara Rd 50 45 45 No Previous Posted Speed Limit Curbaril Ave Morro Rd to EI Camino Real None 37 35 Del Rio Rd San Benito Rd to end None 36 30 San Anselmo Rd Del Rio Rd to Falda Ave None 37 35 San Benito Rd EI Camino Real to Del Rio Rd None 35 30 Traffic Way Orillas Way to Carrizo Rd None 44 45 Viejo Camino ECR to Santa Barbara Rd None 45 40 Increased Speed Limit Atasc. Avenue Santa Rosa Rd to San Rafael Rd 25 35 35 Atasc. Avenue San Rafael Rd to Santa Barbara Rd 45 50 50 Sycamore Rd Curbaril Ave to Capistrano Rd 35 41 40 EI Camino Real Marco Ave to Rosario Ave 40 45 45 San Gabriel Rd Monita Rd to Morro Rd 35 43 45 Santa Lucia Rd Ardilla Rd to Portola Rd 35 44 40 Traffic Way Rosario Ave to Orillas Way 35 42 40 Capistrano Ave Sycamore Rd to West Mall 30 40 35 Palomar Ave ECR to End 25 &30 35 30 ,No# 216 ITEM NUMBER. C -2 DATE. 09/14/10 Five of the streets in the above table were determined to meet the State's criteria for a 5-mph reduction of the critical speed (85th percentile) and are recommended for a reduced speed limit, they are • Del Rio Road San Benito Rd to End • San Benito Road EI Camino Real to Del Rio Road • Viejo Camino Rd EI Camino Real to Santa Barbara Rd • Capistrano Road Sycamore Rd to West Mall • Palomar Road EI Camino Real to End In all cases for these streets the number of pedestrian and bicycle users along the street segments, lack of sidewalk or suitable shoulder, proximity to schools or parks and generally residential nature of the areas trigger the need for the 5-mph reduction Similarly, thirteen other streets in the study area, that have posted speed limits, were also determined by the City Engineer to meet the State's criteria for a 5-mph reduction of the critical speed (85th percentile) In these cases the currently posted speed limits will not change, they are • Atascadero Ave Morro Rd to Curbaril Ave • Atascadero Ave Curbaril Ave to Santa Rosa Rd • EI Camino Real Rosario Ave to Morro Rd • EI Camino Real Morro Rd to Palomar Ave • Monterey Rd San Anselmo Rd to Del Rio Rd • Portola Rd Ardilla Ave to Morro Rd • Portola Road Morro Road to Atascadero Ave • San Anselmo Road Falda Ave to EI Camino Real • Santa Lucia Ave Ardilla Ave to Portola Rd • Santa Rosa Road Atascadero Ave to Morro Rd • Santa Ysabel Ave Morro Rd to Curbaril Ave • Traffic Way Olmeda Ave to Rosario Ave • Junipero Ave EI Camino Real to End This determination is attached to, and becomes part of, the traffic and speed survey 217 ITEM NUMBER. C-2 DATE 09/14/10 Speed surveys are valid for five years, and can be extended an additional three years upon certification by an engineer that no significant changes have been made in the *400 area governed by the survey A complete list of the 35 road segments, existing posted speed limits, 85th percentile speed, and the recommended speed limit is listed below ATASCADERO SPEED SURVEY Posted Speed Critical Speed Recommended Speed Posted Speed Study Segment Boundaries Limit (W Percentile) Limit Change? Atascadero Ave Morro Road to Curbaril Avenue 35 41 36 No Atascaderp Kite Carbaril Avenue to Santa Rosa Road 35 4Q 36 No Atascadero Ave Santa Rosa Road to San Rafael Road 25 35 35 Yes Atascadero iwiit, San Rafael Road to Santis Barbara Rd 46 50 66 Yes Curbaril Avenue Morro Road to EI Camino Real NPS 37 36 No CurbarR Av44e, EI Camino Real to Valle Avenue 40 42 40 fd0 Curbaril Avenue Valle Avenue to Sycamore Road 40 42 40 No Sycamore.l7oaO Curbartl Avenue to Capistrano Ave 36 41 40 Yee Del Rio Road San Benito Road to End NPS 36 30 No EI Camhw tsa - Santa Cr4i Road to Del Mo Road 45 45 46 No EI Camino Real Del Rio Road to Marco Lane 45 44 46 No EI Camilo"- Marco Lane to Rosario Avenue 40 45 46 Yes EI Camino Real Rosario Avenue to Morro Road 25 32 26 No El Comlao=Real; Morro Road to PalamarAvonue 35 40 35 Mo EI Camino Real Palomar Avenue to Ash Street 40 40 40 No EI Camino Remi Ash Street to Satz Alego Road 46 44 45 No EI Camino Real San Diego Road to Santa Barbara Rd 50 45 46 Yes Motrt®re -lRead San Anselmo Rd to Del Rio Road 36 42 36 No Portola Road Ardilla Road to Morro Road 35 40 35 No Pottolo Ro# Morro Road to Atascadero Ave 35 36 35 No San Anselmo Rd Del Rio Road to Falda Road NPS 37 36 No San Ansetmb4ld Faida Road to El Camino Real 38 41 36 No San Benito Road EI Camino Real to Del Rio Road NPS 35 30 No San Gabriel Roird Monne Road to Marro Road 36 43 46- Yes Santa Lucia Road Ardilla Road to Portola Road 35 44 40 Yes Santa Lucia.Awd' Portols Road to Laurol Road. 40 41 40 No Santa Rosa Road Atascadero Ave to Morro Road 35 38 36 No Santa Ysabol[Au* Morro Road to Curbaril Avenue 2$ 34 26 No Traffic Way Olmeda Avenue to Rosario Avenue 35 41 36 No TrafticMij, Rosario Avenue to Orillaa3 Way 36 42 -40 Y** Traffic Way Orillas Way to Carrizo Road NPS 44 45 No Junipero Avon" EI Camino Real to End 26 30 26 No Capistrano Ave Sycamore Road to West Mall 30 40 36 Yes Palomar Awinja0 a Camino Ram to End 2"Q 35 30 Viejo Camino EI Camino Real to Santa Barbara Rd NPS 45 40 No 218 ITEM NUMBER. C -2 DATE 09/14/10 FISCAL IMPACT VAW- The estimated cost of installing a new speed limit sign and post is $250-$350, and to replace an existing speed limit sign is $100 The fiscal impact of this action is approximately $8,000 for materials and labor to be paid out of currently budgeted Street Maintenance funds ALTERNATIVES 1 Council may reject staff's recommendation and direct staff to disapprove the Speed Study This is not recommended as it would reduce or eliminate the enforceability of use of radar when challenged in court. 2 Council may reject staff's recommendation and direct staff to re-study certain road segments and return a modified Speed Study to City Council at a later date ATTACHMENT Draft Resolution 219 ITEM NUMBER. C -2 DATE 09/14/10 DRAFT RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS ON VARIOUS ROADWAYS WHEREAS, Division 11, Chapter 7, Article 1 of the California Vehicle Code (Section 22348 et seq ) provides the mechanism for local authorities to "determine and declare" a prima facie speed limit in excess of 25 mph, and less than 70 mph on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey; and, WHEREAS, Section 4-2 501, et. seq, of the Atascadero Municipal Code allows the City Engineer, through an engineering and traffic survey, to determine the appropriate speed limit for streets within the City; and, WHEREAS, an engineering and traffic survey performed by TPG Consulting, Inc dated July 2010, as approved by the City Engineer, has determined the appropriate and safe speeds on various city streets, and, WHEREAS, after analyzing the engineering and traffic survey, the Traffic Engineer determined the proposed speed limits using the 85th percentile from the survey NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Atascadero directs the City Engineer to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings to indicate the prima facie speeds determined by engineering speed survey listed on attached Exhibit A. 220 ITEM NUMBER. C-2 DATE. 09/14/10 On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member VIAW the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote AYES NOES ABSENT ADOPTED CITY OF ATASCADERO By Roberta Fonzi, Mayor ATTEST Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M C., City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney City Attorney 221 ITEM NUMBER. C -2 DATE 09/14/10 EXHIBIT "A" ,ago, ATASCADERO SPEED SURVEY P oste d Speed Critical Speed Recommended Speed Posted Speed Study Segment Boundaries Limit (85th Percentile) Limit Change? Atascadero Ave Morro Road to Curbaril Avenue 35 41 36 No AtascaderwAipe Curbaril Avenue to Santa Rasa Road 35 40 36 No Atascadoro Ave Santa Rosa Road to San Rafael Road 25 35 36 Yes AtascadercAlve San Rafael Road to Santa Barbara Rd 45 50 -60 Yeg Curbaril Avenue Morro Road to El Camino Real NPS 37 36 Yes Curbaril Avem[9 El Camino Real to Valle Avenue 40 42 40 No Curbaril Avenue Valle Avenue to Sycamore Road 40 42 40 No Sycamore. iad Curbaril Avenue to Capistrano Ave 35 41 40 yes Del Rio Road San Benito Road to End NPS 36 30 Yes El Camtnp#mat Santa Cruz Road to pei.Rio Road 45 46 46 No EI Camino Real Del Rio Road to Marco Lane 45 44 45 No EI Oamhaa eai Marco Lane to Rosa ria Avenue 40 45 46 yos EI Camino Real Rosario Avenue to Morro Road 25 32 26 No EI Camino Raaf Morro Road to Palomar Avenue 35 40 36 No EI Camino Real Palomar Avenue to Ash Street 40 40 40 No El Camino R+aal Ash Street to San Diego Road 45 44 46 No EI Camino Real San Diego Road to Santa Barbara Rd 50 45 46 Yes Monterey Read - SanAnselmo Rd to Del Rio Road 35 42 36 No Portola Road Ardilla Road to Morro Road 35 40 36 No Portola Rostl Morro Road to Atascadero Ave 35 38 36 IJo San Anselmo Rd Del Rio Road to Folds Road NPS 37 35 Yes San Anselrh�* Faida Road to EI Camino Real 36 41 38 -Nb San Benito Road El Camino Real to Del Rio Road NPS 35 30 Yes San Gabrlel.Rirad Monita Road to Morro Road 35 43 46 Yea Santa Lucia Road Ardilla Road to Portola Road 35 44 40 Yes Santa)Lucla Road Portola Road to Laurel Road 40 41 40 No Santa Rosa Road Atascadero Ave to Morro Road 35 38 35 No Santa YsabefAve Morro Road to Curbaril Avenue 25 34 Zg No Traffic Way Olmeda Avenue to Rosario Avenue 35 41 36 No Traffic Warr? Rosa do Avenue to prtilas Way 35 42 40 Y" Traffic Way Orillas Way to Carrizo Road NPS 44 46 Yes JuniparOAvetuua - 91 Camino Real to End 26 30 25 No Capistrano Ave Sycamore Road to West Mall 30 40 36 Yes Palomar Avenue El Camino Real to End 25/30 35 30 Yes* Viejo Camino El Camino Real to Santa Barbara Rd NPS 45 40 Yes -000 222 ITEM NUMBER. CC Annemts &Reports- AM DATE 09/14110 NOW Excerpts from the June newsletter of the Tobacco Free Coalition No Butts About It, Tobacco Retail Licensing Pays Off-- Grover Beach Sting Finds Merchants Obeying the Law This sting stung only one On Wednesday, April 28, 2010 the Grover Beach Police Department conducted a tobacco law enforcement operation to see if local businesses would sell tobacco to minors Eighteen stores and gas stations were visited and only one was caught allowing a juvenile decoy to purchase tobacco products Grover Beach Is a great example of how a community can better protect their youth Before 2005 Grover Beach had an illegal tobacco sales rate of 46%, meaning nearly half of the stores surveyed had sold tobacco to a child So in order to decrease youth access to kids, the City adopted a Tobacco Retail Licensing ordinance, which requires all retailers to obtain a license to sell tobacco products The annual fee for the license is applied towards the costs associated with administering and enforcing the license Additionally, the ordinance sets up a series of penalties for the store owners if their establish-ment is caught selling tobacco to minors The fear of license suspension and revocation is significant motivation for compliance with the law The Tobacco Retail Licensing Ordinance, along with its strong enforcement, has paid off for the City Since 2005 the City has seen a steady drop In their illegal sales of tobacco to minors with the latest decoy operation finding only the one store out of fourteen in violation, a 6% illegal sales rate Now Grover Beach has a far lower illegal sales rate than the State average of 14 6 % and Is used as a model These numbers clearly show how effective a Tobacco Retail License can be in decreasing tobacco sales to minors and the City of Grover Beach is to be applauded In their achievement and their continued commitment to protecting the youth of the community Along with Grover Beach other communities In the area that have decided to adopt a Tobacco Retail License to address the illegal sales of tobacco and work to decrease their youth smoking rates are- Arroyo Grande, the City of San Luis Obispo and San Luis Obispo County, all have shown a marked decrease in their sale of tobacco to children Of the local cities yet to tackle the issue of youth access to tobacco are Atascadero, Morro Bay, Paso Robles and Pismo Beach Know of someone interested in learning more about how to reduce youth smoking and access to tobacco in their community, or the sale of tobacco products to minors? They're encouraged to call Amber Alewlne at the Tobacco Control Program at (805) 781-5564 223 ITEM NUMBER. CC Anncmts &Reports- Att.2 DATE 09/14/10 PRESS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Christina Lefevre San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department August 16, 2010 (805) 781-5564 Eight Retailers in Atascadero Caught Selling Tobacco to a Minor Atascadero, CA —In a tobacco compliance check conducted on Monday, August 9, 2010, eight citations were issued in Atascadero stores for selling tobacco to a 17 year-old minor decoy Although the majority of retailers were found in compliance with the law, despite aggressive tobacco retailer training, consistent enforcement of tobacco laws and a strong community education campaign, which included rewarding retailers in compliance with the laws, 32% of Atascadero retailers were found illegally selling tobacco to kids. The compliance check conducted by the Atascadero Police Department, in collaboration with the San Luis Obispo County Tobacco Control Program surveyed twenty-five stores licensed to sell tobacco products. All seventeen of the stores who refused to sell tobacco to the minor verified the decoy's identification and should be commended Of the eight stores which sold illegally tok,„r+ the minor, half verified identification and still sold to the minor, while the other half failed to even ask for identification Four of the eight stores cited had previously been involved in illegal sales to a minor in the past year Periodic checks of this type are conducted in cities and unincorporated areas throughout the county, in an ongoing effort to reduce youth access to tobacco products Under Penal Code 308(a), it is illegal to sell tobacco products to anyone under the age of 18 This third in a series of compliance checks in Atascadero since last November generated an illegal sales rate for the City of 32%, an increase over the last two surveys, November 2009, 22%, and March 2010, 23%---the current average for illegal sales in the State of California is 126% "These illegal sales could have been avoided by simply asking for identification and checking it carefully," said Christina Lefevre, Health Education Specialist with the SLO County Tobacco Control Program "Unfortunately, there is not enough emphasis placed on the importance of following the law As a result, youth gain access to a deadly addiction that is extremely costly from a public health perspective We suggest retailers always check ID carefully no matter how confident someone appears." Lefevre said Over the past year, merchant education has been conducted by the Tobacco Control Program throughout the County and offered to retail tobacco stores. Informational materials and sign! were distributed, and managers were educated about training clerks to ask for identification and"" 224 ITEM NUMBER. CC Anncmts &Reports- Att.2 DATE. 09/14/10 their responsibility for posting signs, etc. Following the last tobacco compliance check in March, certificates of appreciation were awarded and letter of thanks sent by Atascadero Mayor Roberta Fonzi to the stores found in compliance "We appreciate retailers who make the extra effort to follow the law and protect youth, such as Maria Morales, the owner of 7-Eleven on EI Camino Real, who conducts independent surveys of her store, and although her clerk was cited on Monday, she contacted our office immediately to ask what more her business could do to prevent sales to minors," said Lefevre. "There's also Nizar Patel, the owner of the Arco AM/PM on San Anselmo, a retailer getting it right. Since having taken over the store they have not received any tobacco violations and recently attended a voluntary State Board of Equalization training offered in conjunction with our program to learn more about what they could do to safeguard themselves and the community " In addition, some retailers, such as Food For Less, have chosen to discontinue the sale of tobacco altogether These retailers are working to decrease illegal access of tobacco and should be applauded for their commitment to uphold the law and to the youth of our community Anyone interested in learning more about how to reduce youth smoking and access to tobacco in their community, or the sale of tobacco products to minors is encouraged to call Christina Lefevre at the Tobacco Control Program at (805) 781-5564 Tobacco Retailers Cited for Sale of Tobacco to a Minor: 1 CVS 8320 EI Camino Real 2 Discount Cigarette 8457 EI Camino Real 3 EI Camino Liquor, Inc. 7403 EI Camino Real 4 San Anselmo Unocal 76 6105 San Anselmo Road 5 Shell 8000 Morro Road 6 Spencer's Fresh Markets 8665 EI Camino Real 7 The Club Smoke Shop 5735 El Camino Real 8 7-Eleven Store #2133-25473 C 8000 EI Camino Real Tobacco Retailers Found In Compliance. 1 Walgreens #07210 8005 EI Camino Real 2 Rite Aid #5827 7055 EI Camino Real 3 Atascadero Tesoro 6305 Morro Road 4 VPPS Atascadero 8955 Montecito Avenue 5 Chalk Mountain Liquor & Deli 9990 EI Camino Real 6 STAGE Coach Liquor 5145 EI Camino Real 7 Vons #2314 7135 EI Camino Real 8 Circle K Food Stores #1197 6930 Morro Road 9 Circle K Food Stores #1232 4381 EI Camino Real *""` 10 Atascadero Shell Foodmart 9155 San Gabriel Rood 225 ITEM NUMBER. CC Anncmts & Reports- Att.2 DATE. 09/14/10 11 Shores Service 6700 El Camino Real 12 Arco AM/PM 6100 San Anselmo Road 13 Cigarette 4 Less 4060 EI Camino Real 14 Albertson's Supermarket #6390 8200 EI Camino Real 15 Chevron 6280 Morro Road 16 Paloma Creek Mart 11250 Viejo Camino 17 Atascadero Shell 2000 EI Camino Real 226