Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 0410070 1 �io�oroi ,I CITY OF A TASCADEROCITY COUNCIL AGENDA Tuesday, April 10, 2007 Closed Session: 6:00 p.m. Redevelopment Agency: 6:30 p.m. City Council: 7:00 P.M. City Hall Council Chambers 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, California • CLOSED SESSION: 8:00 P.M. 1. PUBLIC COMMENT — CLOSED SESSION 2. CALL TO ORDER a. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Govt. Code Sec. 54957.6) Agency Designated Representatives: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manager Jim Lewis Employee Organizations: Department Heads, Confidential, Atascadero Police Association, Atascadero Professional Fire Fighters Association Local 3600, Unrepresented Employees: Part -Time Employees. b. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Govt. Code Sec. 54956.8) Property: Easement from Capistrano Avenue to Stadium Park along APN# 029-105-028 Agency Negotiator: Patrick Enright, City Attorney Negotiating Parties: Dr. Gary Renzaglia Under Negotiation: Instruction to negotiator will concern price and terms of payment. • c. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -- Existing Litigation (Govt. Code Sec. 54956.9 (a)) 1. Citv of Atascadero v. Pacific Gas and Electric 1 3. ADJOURN • CLOSED SESSION REPORT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M. REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council Member O'Malley ROLL CALL: Mayor Luna Mayor Pro Tem Brennler Council Member Beraud Council Member Clay Council Member O'Malley COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to • address the Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to five minutes. Please state your name for the record before making your presentation. The Council may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum, unless changed by the Council.) APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call PRESENTATIONS: 1. Proclamation declaring April 2007 "Month of the Child" and "Child Abuse Prevention Month" and April 14, 2007 "Day of the Child." COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative, Council Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities. Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. The Council may take action on items listed on the Agenda.) 2 A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (All items on the consent calendar are considered to • be routine and non -controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the item before action is taken.) 1. City Council Strategic Planning Workshop Notes — February 23-24, 2007 ■ City Clerk Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Strategic Planning Workshop Notes of February 23-24, 2007. [City Clerk] 2. CKV Council Strategic Planning Workshop Minutes — February 23-24, 2007 ■ City Clerk Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Strategic Planning Workshop Minutes of February 23-24, 2007. [City Clerk] 3. City Council Meeting Minutes — February 27, 2007 ■ City Clerk Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Meeting Minutes of February 27, 2007. [City Clerk] 4. City Council Meeting Minutes — March 13, 2007 ■ City Clerk Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Meeting • Minutes of March 13, 2007. [City Clerk] 5. February 2007 Accounts Payable and Payroll Disbursements ■ Fiscal Impact: $2,448,838.51. ■ Recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for February 2007. [Administrative Services] 6. Acceptance of the Offers of Dedication Tract 2495 (Apple Valley) ■ Description: Acceptance of the Offers of Dedication and rejection of maintenance of the public improvements will allow the property owners of Apple Valley to fund the maintenance of the improvements. ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendations: Council: 1. Adopt the Draft Resolution accepting the Offers of Dedication on Tract 2495 for a) Streets; b) Public Pedestrian Access Easements; c) Public Landscape Easement; d) Public Utility Easement; e) Public Drainage Easement; f) Public Sewer Easement; g) Lots 71, 72, 73; and • 2. Reject the improvements in the areas of dedication for maintenance. [Public Works] 3 • 7. Final Map 2006-0144 (Parcel Map AT 06-0113) 8905 Montecito Road (TPM 2006-0085) (Gearhart) ■ Descriotion: Tentative Parcel Map approved the division of 1.11 acres into three (3) lots. ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendations: Council: 1. Adopt and Approve Final Map 2006-0144 (Parcel Map AT 06-0113); and, 2. Reject, without prejudice to future acceptance on behalf of the public, the offers of dedication for Public Utility, Drainage, and Pedestrian Access Easement.; and, 3. Authorize and direct City Clerk to endorse the City Council's approval on the Map. [Public Works] 8. Final Mao 2004-0079 (Parcel Map AT 01-091) 9230 Vista Bonita (TPM 2002-0028) (Fredrick) ■ Description: Tentative Parcel Map approved the division of 4.33 acres into two lots of 1.87 and 2.46 acres. • ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendations: Council: 1. Adopt and Approve Final Map 2004-0079 (Parcel Map AT 01-091). 2. Order the abandonment of Vista Bonita Avenue (formerly EI Dorado Avenue) as shown on the Map of Tract 5 in accordance with Government Code Section 66445j, with the filing of Parcel Map AT 01- 091, and reserving the easements so designated on Parcel Map AT 01-091 as: a. For Private Access and Public Drainage Purposes and all uses incidental thereto for the use and benefit of the present or future owners of the lots affected by such easements, and b. For Public use and the benefit of the several Public Utility Companies and Atascadero Mutual Water Company ("AMWC") which are authorized to serve in said subdivision, easements for public utility purposes, delineated on said map as "Public Utility Easement" or "P.U.E." 3. Authorize and direct City Clerk to endorse the City Council's approval on the Map and Certify that the City Council ordered the abandonment of Vista Bonita Avenue as shown on the map. [Public Works] • M 9. Final Map 2006-0149 (Tract 2681) 2865 Ferrocarril Road (TTM 2004 - • 0059)(Tharp) ■ Description: Final Map 2006-0149 creates a five lot residential sub,+ivision. ■ Fiscal Impact: None. • Recommendations: Council: 1. Adopt and Approve Final Map 2006-0149 (Tract 2681). 2. Reject, without prejudice to future acceptance on behalf of the public, the offers of dedication for all Public Roads and the Public Easement for equestrian and pedestrian purposes, as shown on the map. 3. Authorize and direct City Clerk to endorse the City Council's approval. [Public Works] B. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. Adopt -A -Road Program ■ Description: This program would provide an additional tool to assist with the litter removal aspect of road maintenance. ■ Fiscal Impact: Some City staff time will be necessary for the direction and coordination of the program participants, and purchase and installation of recognition signs will cost approximately $200.00 per sign. ■ Recommendation: Council authorize the Public Works Director to • implement an Adopt -A -Road Program. [Public Works] 2. Eagle Creek Golf Course Reuse — Study Session ■ Disclosure of Ex Parte Communications ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendation: Council provide direction to staff and Planning Commission on how to proceed with amendments to the Eagle Creek Golf Course project. [Community Development] 3. Adoption of Commissioner Norms ■ Description: Adoption of this Resolution will create conduct guidelines for Commissioners. • Fiscal Impact: None. • Recommendation: Council adopt Draft Resolution adopting Norms for the Planning Commissioners and Parks and Recreation Commissioners. [City Attorney] 4. Adoption of General Plan Amendment Policy ■ Description: General Plan Amendment Policy would reflect current City process in written form. • Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendation: Council adopt Draft Resolution establishing a policy for amending the General Plan. [City Attorney] 61 D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: (The following represent standing committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary): • Mayor Luna 1. County Mayor's Round Table 2. Finance Committee 3. S.L.O. County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Water Resources Advisory Committee 4. Nacimiento Water Purveyors' Contract Technical Advisory Group 5. North County Water Purveyors Group Mayor Pro Tem Brennler 1. Air Pollution Control District (APCD) 2. Economic Opportunity Commission (EOC) 3. Atascadero Youth Task Force Council Member Beraud 1. Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA) 2. City / Schools Committee Council Member Clay 1. City / Schools Committee Council Member O'Malley • 1. S.L.O. Council of Governments (SLOCOG) / S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority (SLORTA) 2. Finance Committee 3. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC) 4. League of California Cities — Council Liaison E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: 1. City Council 2. City Clerk 3. City Treasurer 4. City Attorney 5. City Manager - a. Commission Attendance Reports 0 • F. ADJOURNMENT: • Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. Correspondence submitted at this public hearing will be distributed to the Council and available for review in the City Clerk's office. I, Victoria Randall, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing agenda for the April 10, 2007 Regular Session of the Atascadero City Council was posted on April 3, 2007 at the Atascadero City Hall, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422 and was available for public review in the Customer Service Center at that location. Signed this 3rd day of April, 2007 at Atascadero, California. Victoria Randall, Deputy City Clerk City of Atascadero • 7 City of Atascadero WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m., at the City Hall • Council Chambers, 6907 EI Camino Real, Atascadero. Matters are considered by the Council in the order of the printed Agenda. Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public inspection during City Hall business hours at the Central Receptionist counter and on our website, www.atascadero.orp. An agenda packet is also available for public review at the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road. Contracts, Resolutions and Ordinances will be allocated a number once they are approved by the City Council. The minutes of this meeting will reflect these numbers. All documents submitted by the public during Council meetings that are either read into the record or referred to in their statement will be noted in the minutes and available for review in the City Clerk's office. Council meetings are recorded and may be reviewed by the public. Copies of meeting recordings are available for a fee. Contact the City Clerk for more information (470-3400). In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office or the City Clerk's Office, both at (805) 470-3400. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service. TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS (from Title 2, Chapter 1 of the Atascadero Municipal Code) Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will give their report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being considered to step up to the podium. If you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way: 1. You must approach the podium and be recognized by the Mayor 2. Give your name and address (not required) 3. Make your statement . 4. All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council 5. No person shall be permitted to make slanderous, profane or negative personal remarks concerning any other individual, absent or present 6. All comments limited to 5 minutes (unless changed by the Council) 7. No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so, and no one may speak more than twice on any item. If you wish to use a computer presentation to support your comments, you must notify the City Clerk's office at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Access to hook up your laptop to the City's projector will be provided. You are required to submit to the City Clerk a printed copy of your presentation for the record. Please check in with the City Clerk before the meeting begins to announce your presence and turn in the printed copy. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public comments will be heard by the Council. TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA Under Agenda item, "COMMUNITY FORUM", the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having business with the Council to: • Please approach the podium and be recognized • Give your name and address (not required) • State the nature of your business This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum (unless changed by the Council). TO HAVE ITEMS PLACED ON AGENDA All business matters to appear on the Agenda must be in the Office of the City Manager 14 days preceding the Council. meeting. Should you have a matter you wish to bring before the Council, please mail or bring a written communication to the City Manager's office in City Hall prior to the deadline. r CITY OF ATASCADERO PROCLAMATION "Month of the Child" and "Child Abuse Prevention Month"- April 2007 "Day of the Child" - April 14, 2007 "Children's Opportunities — Our Responsiblities" WHEREAS, Saturday, April 14, 2007, will commemorate the 29`h annual "Day of the Child" celebration during Children's Day in the San Luis Obispo Mission Plaza. A day where children and families interact with the agencies and programs providing services throughout the County; and WHEREAS, The month of the child and child abuse prevention month is a time to recognize that children's opportunities are our responsibilities, and to commit ourselves to ensuring that each and every child experiences a quality early environment — at home, at child care, at school and in the community — that will promote their optimal development; and WHEREAS, The City of Atascadero recognizes that every moment in a child's life is an opportunity for that child to learn, and that the quality of these experiences may determine whether a child succeeds in school and in life, and that all children need caring and loving adults in their lives; and WHEREAS, The activities of this month will provide an opportunity to acknowledge youth and early care and education programs and their dedicated staff, and to raise the awareness of the community, employers and elected officials of the need to improve the quality, availability, and accessibility of such programs; And, may we remember to listen to and watch the children around us, to have patience and to allow them the opportunity to enjoy the journey of childhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, George Luna, Mayor of the City of Atascadero, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby proclaim April 2007 as the "Month of the Child" and "Child Abuse Prevention Month" and April 14, 2007 as "Day of the Child". WITNESS THE OFFICIAL SEAL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO: Dr. George Luna, Mayor City of Atascadero, California April 10, 2007 a • • 10 • G El�rz�a �I Irl �ildl I`,�� r, February 23, 2007 ITEM NUMBER: A - 1 DATE: 04/10/07 City of Atascadero Notes from the Annual Strategic Planning Workshop February 23/24, 2007 Mayor Luna opened the Council meeting; took roll call, and turned it over to Dr. Bill Mathis. Discussion was held with Council members regarding changes _a.�,Mg place in the City of Atascadero. How Councils are different? • New group, new Council members Discussion with Dr. Bill and Council/City Manager regarding where we're headed o Understanding where each is coming from ■ Values/Culture o Exercise with Council members - when you discover you're "riding a dead horse" best strategy is to dismount. ■ 1. Personal basis ■ 2. Business basis [Great discussion with all Council Members] • Dr. Bill — Discussion of "Less is More" Public Comment • Concern that Council Norms be followed Dr. Bill discussed open communication and strategy to help the Council get to know each other... Getting to know the Council Members 1. Council Members' stories 2. What they learned from the election? 3. How they make decisions? 4. 2 Talents they can each contribute? 5. 2 Pet peeves? 6. 2 Areas of interest? www.MathisAssociates.com City of Atascadero - Annual Strategic Planning Workshop Tom - Memories of the good old days in Atascadero; history in town, relationships with people, wants the restoration of historical town. Learned - Community is polarized; majority appreciate the positive approach Decisions - Wants facts, cost, analytical, history, future impacts and fairness for all Talents - Sees both sides needed; inspires folks to positive direction Pet Peeves - Mean-spirited, dishonesty - healing needed through working together Interests - Campaign reform, regional tourism, stadium/zoo - ecotourism, natural potential - people centered events/community events Ellen - She's an athlete - on track; this has kept her focused and disciplined Learned - There is power in public education; don't believe everything in the newspaper Decisions - Gathers information, all facts, all viewpoints; follows rules, listens to public, asks questions of staff Talents - Stays on track Pet Peeves - Unjust criticism; lack of respect Interests - Building public trust; eliminating distrust; working on openness; urban forests - less destruction; open spaces; public participation Jerry - He is committed to Atascadero - all his life Decisions - What's best for community; he is verbal, asks questions; his mind is mostly made up 0 Talents - History of Atascadero; experiences; role in representing the working folks Pet Peeves - When people cave in under pressure; when staff gets punished in public meetings Interests - Wal-Mart; super grocery store George - Worked toward consensus in creating Redevelopment; worked with staff; was successful. He would like to work through a consensus approach for more projects. Learned - The community doesn't want super Wal-Mart; Council wants openness Decisions - Does homework, studies General Plan; listens to public Talents - Open to ideas; is very patient with public Pet Peeves - Listening to nonsense Interests - City commitment; climate control; campaign finance reform Mike - Raised in military family - Germany to California, poor neighborhood - fought for survival = don't judge book by its cover. Learned - By speaking from the heart - they listened; good people in Atascadero Decisions - Wants to educate himself, studies; please offer information and assistance to him; wants to have hands on - listen and compromise www.MathisAssociates.com 1) 12 City of Atascadero - Annual Strategic Planning Workshop • Talents - Honesty, is trustworthy Pet Peeves - He isn't past Councilmember! Wants to work together Interests - Commercial growth - inside the General Plan; campaign reform Straight Talk / Courageous Conversations with Council members - Issues and baggage from election Comments about Staff during election? Do you still feel that way? Problem regarding: o How do we trust each other? How do we work together? ■ Quit sniping at City Council meetings; earn each other's trust ■ Televise the meetings - show the people what's going on ■ Stop bickering at each other; don't shut down communication ■ Mike will meet with Jerry Thought we would let 'by-gones be by-gones' - don't want division; want to work with other City Council Members - has been offended that we haven't tried harder to work with each other. o Don't criticize on the dais; please respect each other on the dais - want to keep the 'peace of the Council' in meetings • Campaign finance -discussion of fairness; receiving money from developers; image of wrong -doing or unethical conduct o Need to support FPPC guidelines o Central Coast Taxpayers Group (for Wal-Mart) influenced the election o May 30th meeting was not good... it hurt the City Dr. Bill - Negative comments shouldn't be said - especially while on the dais. Need to speak as unified body on the dais - not "those guys", "you guys", etc.; it's disruptive to the discourse. Need to move forward. We will work together to further our trust; focus our real attention on the business being done. We're on the dock; let's work together to set sail. We have to be responsible for our own behavior. We represent our constituents - do not always think alike. Wade discussed Council setting the example for the public at Council meetings. Need to be diplomatic. Roles of Council, City Manager, Staff, Direction and responsibilities. The conversation was helpful for all to have - clear communication and courageous conversations. `Strength in diversity' www.MathisAssociates.com 3 13 City of Atascadero - Annual Strategic Planning Workshop Rating Communication Rules for Effective Team Building Rating: Worst = 1 - Best = 10 • Staying on Topic - • Cross Talk - • Allow others to finish ideas - • All opinions are okay - • Crystal Balling - Best part about tonight - Rating = 5; Could be better Rating = Not bad, we do pretty well Rating = Pretty well most the time Rating = 5; sometimes 3'/2 Rating = Sometimes we do this Jerry - Good to clear the air; we made progress Tom - It's helpful for me that we detoured from the agenda into a good conversation. It was helpful to get off task and discuss the fundamental barrier between us. We know what to work on; we want to clear all baggage - tonight was worth the time. Ellen - Best part was that we spent time together, listened to each other; got rid of some of our baggage. It's not finished, but we're in the same boat moving forward; we have things we want to get done. Mike - We put our cards on the table - very important. We need to choose our words carefully; I have my opinions; we all need to look at things this way. George - We didn't get completely past the election; when we discuss goals tomorrow we will establish more trust. Wade - The discussion was good to have so we can get on to the business. We're moving forward. Jerry - Diversity is good. Meeting adjourned at 8:57. 14 www.MathisAssociates.com M • r� • City of Atascadero - Annual Strategic Planning Workshop • Saturday, February 24, 2007 - 8:30 a.m. City Council, All Staff, Facilitator, and Public Mayor welcomed, called roll, and the meeting began with all Staff Reports. Questions from Council; answers from staff and discussion... Update on accomplishments over the past year. • Enhance Public Safety • Improving City's Financial Condition • Construction of Youth/Senior Recreation Center • Continuing Emphasis on Road Maintenance • Repair of the Historic City Hall Building Public Comment: • We welcome this discussion; was glad to hear that we will hear a public process regarding the transit center - would like full public outreach and involvement. • Member of the Board of Supervisors - Echoing some of what he heard this morning; basically the same message as the County's message - cost escalation vs. costs for maintaining, balancing the budget, etc. Will have to be more creative in the future; working regionally, establish partnerships among community, county, reaching out in this process to communicate the needs with the citizens. Similar challenges; working together, rethink our levels of service - what is acceptable for increasing revenue, working efficiently without reducing services? Where do we cut? Maybe we could raise funds for deferred maintenance through Mayor's dinner, other events, etc. transportation, we haven't begun... there us little money for expansion and capacity is limited. Park and ride, alternatives, etc., need to think smarter, together, long-term, smart growth; same issues are going on everywhere. We need to be part of the dialog - keep it alive in working together to solve some of the regional problems. Need to work regionally, communicate better regarding the challenges we all face - think beyond the boundaries with cities, counties in solving internal issues. • The job is to generate the money to keep the bare minimum of what we have; need to raise the salaries of Public Safety. Look at the advancements the city has made; it has come on the backs of city employees. www.MathisAssociates.com 5 15 City of Atascadero - Annual Strategic Planning Workshop • Need to know how we're going to maintain the quality of life; want to talk • about the zoo. We need to advance this city's quality of life through retrenching, maintaining and expanding what we have. Ideas of paths, youth center, etc. are great but this isn't where our dollars need to be. The zoo is part of the educational program — good for all. Tourist draw and revenue generator for the City. Don't look at building new or stretching for future — look at what we have and maintain in this area. o Response from Council; the City has always been supportive of the zoo. Regarding deferred maintenance — need to have a required linkage for deferred maintenance every time we spend for new work. Some roads are more important than others; exit roads, roads for safety, emergency access, are priorities for keeping improved. o Roads are calculated, estimated travel, highest priority road (circulation roads), etc. • Atascadero State Hospital — encouraged that the City get involved with people at the hospital regarding ASH and policymakers, mayor pro tem, etc. — They are doing this. Staff is directed to send a second letter — will be put on Council Agenda. • Discussion with Council and staff regarding goals, brainstorming, Council's direction, costing out by Staff — bringing to the budget. Citizen comments on goals for 2007/08 • Citizen from Paso Robles — serves on zoo society; urges council to support the zoo. The zoo is for the region. Improve zoo funding — follow attendance history. • Important to build on the past; City's economic development strategy project report spells out businesses, new, closed, retention, apartments, sales taxes — all components of the big picture — big dollar sign. Revisit the strategy of last couple of years for next couple of years — create a business report card. Assets we have are in the biking trails, hiking trails, historic downtown — historical activities, and tourism activities that will preserve and enhance. • Chamber of Commerce may already have much of the data that the City has already developed — there is a partnership with them — staff is working on this right now and will be here by budget time. www.MathisAssociates.com 6 16 • City of Atascadero - Annual Strategic Planning Workshop • Encourage and participate in regional partnership, land use planning, transportation, public safety, and economic development. Zoo is pari of conservation, environment, etc. The County supports this already. This is the time to work together in all of these areas. • Little League person — Reinforcing Parks & Recreation — deferred maintenance programs are needed — outdoor programs and facilities need to be taken care of; 280 kids signed up, need lighting for tournament;, need restroom facility; want to have community love to be here. Deterioration in fencing, need dirt brought in, outfield grass is wearing out, borders/fencing coming undone, etc. Reinforce need for deferred maintenance with parks; need to develop the master plan, unsafe playground equipment has been removed; need playground for kids to play. Tourism is an absolute must. Impleme nt the Master Plan for the Zoo. Housing needs study for what we need it apartments, housing. Campaign finance recommended. • Campaign reform is necessary before next election. Progress in C iinate protection. Need to improve our strategies. Open spaces, trees, ( uality of life. City arborist, grants person for open space — would pay off in many ways. • Appreciation of board and City staff for support of the zoo. Notice the themes, tourism, cooperation, Need funding, marketing for the z03. Pursue the Master Plan. Deferred maintenance of Zoo Park and the zoo. Need more support from City for the zoo, increase in signage, conservation/education standpoint. • Tree ordinance needs to be brought back; the forest is old, aginc , and dying. Need to look at open space. Our forest is the hallmark o' Atascadero, history is also. Need new trees now. • Need to consolidate efforts, the City expand the tourism commit e:e to provide a place for people from all arms of tourism • Expand commercial development — seek the retail that we nee(. Keep an open mind regarding commercial developments, revenue. Kee public safety as priority; major goal that needs to be sustained in our (,ity. • Use City's guideline as a hook that we can use as a marketing xool. Recreation equipment, group projects, tree ordinance, econorr c development. Need to have standards — electric that is high le rel; business will be attracted. www.MathisAssociates.com 7 17 City of Atascadero - Annual Strategic Planning Workshop Last night we saw the human side of Council members — it was amazing to see them working and communicating together. Atascadero has done an amazing job. We need economic development that is sustainable and compatible today. Need to use Highway 101 through the City — how do we tap this? Grapes are the number #1 crop grown here. How can we capture people off the Highway 101 — leverage into what makes this City so special. Capture the beauty! Need the road map for where we want to go. What can we do to create a vision? • Want to hear about City Council transparency — televising City Council meetings; also on Charter Cable — all are approved to be done. Municipal policies need to be put on the website. Have Brown Act rules available for citizens, on the web. Preserving downtown, CalTrans needs to be intervened with, want to bring m�, business into the City — but cannot. Change turn -lanes to accommodate traffic. Some landscaping is hazardous to traffic. Regarding old City Hall — don't go back to the old City Hall. Lease it out. We have a good City Hall right now. Need a parking garage right now. City Park — crown jewel in the City. Put the pool in. Historical homes, rotes, need sidewalks. Open system needed. Thanks the City, staff etc. for caring about the town. Support of the Babe 40Ruth Field has been good over several years. Snack bar, restroom, roof are all rotting. Lights are very old. We've been improving it ourselves. Need to address the de -composing facilities, lighting and redo all. Question for Council is, what's manageable? And what's achievable? Council needs to keep this in mind as they go down the road. We need 5-6 achievable goals. Public Comment • Pleased to see Council work for community - not personal issues; taking to a r igher level • Coun :il are terrific people; good to see them talking. Want tourism, wine festivi LI... • Election was shock to all — rough! The voters spoke • Likes -,eeing Council respect each other; okay to disagree — hearts are in the ric it place — working together • RespEct of each other (Council) is important to the people; willing to work together civilly • Commissions have helped with Council Members • www.MathisAssociates.com 8 City of Atascadero -- Annual Strategic Planning Workshop Council Discussion after Public Comment • Tom - Tourism - facing 35-40% increase in hotels; risk is that occupancy is high risk; need regional collaboration, analysis, wine study. Infrastructure needs to be improved and maintained for events, transportation coming through the City. Need economic report; wants bed & breakfast businesses in City. Signage needed in town. Need accreditation for zoo; regarding Tourism, PR material, brochures, marketing the assets we have, develop portable assets to be moved to other locations. Private / Public partnerships needed. o Questions, remarks - Pretty ambitious agenda regarding tourism. Would like to start commercial development in town - can initiatives be tied to results desired? Need to make sure that what we do for tourism is also good for our town. Need to get more revenue first. Need signage for our assets - golf courses, etc. o Council direction needs to be specific; involve the public for their vision. Town meetings to get ideas, consensus, and support. o The General Plan spells out with proposal - Council needs to be part of this prior to the Plan being finalized. 40 o Need community workshop to assess what we want to do; get community input; bring it all together so we can give direction to staff. Focus attention on annex for retention. Shopping needs help - recruitment, etc. Council's Direction to Staff; City Manager Wade McKinney briefed Council on the current economic development policy in place regarding previous direction from Council. Council concurred with the current policy and emphasized that development should conform to the General Plan. Televising Council Meetings - Council meetings will be televised. Economic Base - Council directed staff to prepare action plans developing the City's economic base. The plans should include: ❑ A process to work with the development at Del Rio and EI Camino Real. ❑ A process to create citywide policies regarding commercial development ❑ Continuation on the current Economic Strategy within the confines of the General Plan. Tourism - Council directed staff to report on what is currently being done or spent regarding tourism including Chamber of Commerce, Main Street and www.MathisAssociates.com 9 Wel City of Atascadero - Annual Strategic Planning Workshop others. The Council agreed to review a report prepared by community members interested in tourism (as suggested by Steve Martin) which would include options, possibilities and alternative ways to pay for and provide tourism. This issue would be reviewed as a potential work plan under `Enhance the City's Economic Base' and needs to come back for discussion at a future meeting. Openness and Transparency — Campaign Finance — Council directed staff to prepare a management report so Council can discuss concerns and issues; limits on campaign contributions, ordinances from other cities in the County, campaign signs — everything related to campaign reform. Council Norms — Are more inclusive of Ethics. Dr. Bill suggested that Council hold a separate one day session of Council Norms at a later time. Staff will schedule with Council. Employee Satisfaction Survey — Through best practices of employees, find out how satisfied, what training they might need; provide statistics on employee retention by department. Consultant who will ensure there is confidentiality. Code Enforcement Complaints — Confidentiality — Those who make complaints can do this up -front — after it has been confirmed, to ensure there is actually a violation — prior to any names being released. City Attorney will come back with a report that includes rules. • Independent Investigations — Review Personnel and Procedures to update regarding Personnel Procedures; want independent analysis; appeal process. All issues are conducted by City Manager and/or City Attorney — not City Council. Add information sheet to give the process for personnel grievances. Council Meetings; length; controversial issues — Not limiting people's right to speak; controversial issues — need to have time limit of 11 p.m. for Council meetings. Could plan third Council meeting to catch up and get things done. Council Member can make a motion to adjourn at any time. Prioritizing Goals and Objectives... 1. Improving the City's Economic Base (5) 2. Continue Emphasis on Roads (5) 3. Repair City Hall Building (4) 4. Enhance Public Safety (3) 5. Campaign Reform (3) 6. Natural Resource Program (2) Meeting was adjourned at 3:10 p.m. www.MathisAssociates.com 10 20 • ITEM NUMBER: A - 2 DATE: 04/10/07 0 SPECIAL MEETING ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Strategic Planning Workshop Friday, February 23, 2007, 5:30 p.m. Saturday, February 24, 20079 8:30 a.m. DRAFT MINUTES Friday, February 23, 2007 City Council Team Development: Mayor Luna called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. He asked all present to introduce themselves. All Council Members were present. Mayor Luna explained the agenda for tonight's meeting. Public Comment Eric Greening questioned the reconsideration process and how it was handled in the media. Mayor Luna closed the Public Comment Period Facilitator, Dr. Bill Mathis, stated that Atascadero has new Council Members and this change means the Council is moving in a new direction. In an effort to get to know each other better, Dr. Mathis asked the Council Members to share personal information about themselves by answering a list of the same questions. The City Council chose to ask questions of each other and discuss sensitive issues that developed during the election. The Council conducted a lengthy discussion on these issues. Dr. Mathis and the Council had a discussion on how well they communicate and how they function as a team. 0 Mayor Luna adjourned the meeting at 9:00 p.m. 1 21 ITEM NUMBER: A - 2 DATE: 04/10/07 Saturday, February 24, 2007 0 City Council Goal Setting: Mayor Luna called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m. All Council Members were present, as were all of the Executive Management Team, including the City Attorney. The Executive Management Team gave individual oral reports to update the City Council on staff's progress on the Council's goals. The Council asked questions and discussed various issues presented by staff, including public safety, the City's financial status, deferred maintenance on infrastructure, Community Center update, roads, and the Historic City Hall. Public Comment Comments were received from the following: Eric Greening, Jim Patterson, David Broadwater, Hal Carden, and Dan O'Grady. Mayor Luna closed the Public Comment period. The public was asked to add any additional items to the lists posted on the walls of issues they felt the Council should consider for the goals.0 By consensus, the Council agreed that the following issues are already in process, or are to be placed on a future agenda: 1. Transparency • Televising Council meetings is being done. • Combine Council Norms and Ethics policy ❑ Schedule Study Session within 6 months to create 2, City Employee Satisfaction Survey ■ Staff to bring back to Council several sample surveys • Staff to provide to Council statistics on employee retention by department 3. Code Enforcement Complaints - Confidentiality ■ Council consensus to have City Attorney bring back to Council — Council Members and Commissioners as complainants are not confidential (3:2, Luna and Beraud opposed) 4. Independent Investigations ■ Update Personnel Rules ■ Provide links on City's website to State agencies and documents 22 K ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 04/10/07 5. Length of Council meetings ■ Staff to bring back an Ordinance which includes possible public comment timing variable, ending meetings at 11:00 p.m., and the movement of controversial issues at separate meetings. There was Council consensus to create the following list of goals for 2007-2009: 1. Enhance the City's Economic Base 1. Continue the Emphasis on Road Maintenance 2. Repair the Historic City Hall 3. Continue to Enhance Public Safety 4. Campaign Finance Reform 5. Create a Natural Resources Program MOTION: By Council Member O'Malley and seconded by Council Member Clay to adjourn the meeting. Motion passed 3:2, with Beraud & Clay opposed Meeting adjourned at 3:10 p.m. 0 MINUTES PREPARED BY: Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C. City Clerk • 3 23 • • • 24 • ITEM NUMBER: DATE: CITY OF ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES Tuesday, February 27, 2007, 7:00 P.M. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION INTERVIEWS AND APPOINTMENT: 5:30 P.M. A-3 04/10/07 1. Parks and Recreation Commission Interviews & Appointment ■ City Clerk Recommendation: Council interview the three candidates and select, by ballot two citizens for the Parks and Recreation Commission. Mayor Luna reported that three candidates were interviewed by the City Council for two positions on the Parks and Recreation Commission. He announced that Jonalee Istenes and Barbie Butz were selected to fill the positions. REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M. Mayor Luna called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and Council Member Beraud led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Council Members Beraud, Clay, O'Malley, Brennler, and Mayor Luna Absent: None Others Present: City Clerk / Assistant to City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson, Deputy City Clerk Grace Pucci Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manager Jim Lewis, 0 Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard, Community CC Draft Minutes 02/27/07 Page 1 of 11 25 Development Director Warren Frace, Community Services Director Brady Cherry, Public Works Director Steve Kahn, Fire Chief Kurt Stone, Deputy Community Development Director Steve McHarris, Deputy Executive Director of Redevelopment Marty Tracey, Deputy Public Works Director Geoff English, Associate Planner Kelly Gleason, and City Attorney Patrick Enright. COMMUNITY FORUM: Pastor Tom Farrell, Atascadero Bible Church, led those present in prayer. Robert Winslow, Project Manager EDA Design Professionals representing Wal Mart, read from a prepared statement reporting on events that occurred over the weekend and explaining that Wal Mart would be resubmitting a revised application along with that of the Rottman Group for the Annex Project. Eric Greening commented on the following topics: 1) the recent Strategic Planning Session, 2) looking at opportunities for acquiring and maintaining open space, and 3) the Carrizo Plans National Monument Advisory Committee. Tom Comar, spokesperson for Oppose Wal Mart, explained that they support good economic development at the Annex, and feel a Wal Mart super center is opposed to this philosophy. He urged the City Council to look at a Big Box Ordinance again. Joan O'Keefe spoke about applause and heckling at City Council meetings and its divisive nature. She urged Council to follow the format of the Board of Supervisors and make it clear that there are rules of decorum and ask people to leave if they don't follow those rules. Mayor Luna closed the Community Forum period. Council Member O'Malley reported on the weekend demonstration at the State Hospital and the Council's commitment to support the employees of the city's largest employer. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: MOTION: By Council Member Beraud and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Brennier to approve the agenda. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll -call vote. PRESENTATIONS: 1. Proclamation declaring March 2007 as "Grand Jury Awareness Month." 9 CC Draft Minutes 02/27/07 26 Page 2 of 11 Mayor Pro Tem Brennler read the Proclamation and presented it to Sandra Parker who spoke about the Grand Jury function and purpose. David Claus, current Grand Jury member, reported on the Grand Jury and explained their mission. 2. Employee Service Award Presentations City Manager Wade McKinney presented Employee Service Awards to Zoo Director Alan Baker and Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: Mayor Luna reported on a meeting scheduled for March 9th at City Hall dealing with the problems taking place at Atascadero State Hospital, and announced that he has appointed Mayor Pro Tem Brennler and Council Member O'Malley to attend. Council Member Beraud reported on the Strategic Planning Session. Council Member Clay stated it is important that the public treat city staff in a respectful way. • Mayor Luna read from the Municipal Code regarding public decorum during Council meetings. A. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. City Council Meeting Minutes — January 23, 2007 ■ City Clerk Recommendation: Council approve the City Council meeting minutes of January 23, 2007. [City Clerk] 2. Final Map 2006-0141 (Parcel map AT 05-0043) 7195 Santa Ysabel (TPM 2005-0079) (Eddings) ■ Description: The conversion of one existing dwelling to an airspace condominium and the establishment of two additional airspace units on one common lot. ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendations: Council: 1. Accept Final Parcel Map 2006-0141 (Parcel Mat AT 05-0043); and, 2. Reject, without prejudice to future acceptance, the offers of dedication for Streets and Public Utility Easement on behalf of the public; and, 3. Authorize and direct the City Clerk to endorse the Council's approval on the Map. [Public Works] CC Draft Minutes 02/27/07 Page 3 of 11 27 3. Final Map 2006-0142 (Tract 2757) 5547 Tunitas Avenue (TTM 2005-0075) (Gustafson) ■ Description: This subdivision creates four airspace condominiums on one common lot. ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendations: Council: 1. Adopt and Approve Final Map 2006-0142 (Tract 2757); and, 2. Reject, without prejudice to future acceptance, the offer of dedication for Public Utility Easement on behalf of the public; and, 3. Authorize and direct the City Clerk to endorse the Council's approval on the Map. [Public Works] 4. Final Map 2006-0150 (Parcel Map AT 05-0114) 10665 & 10675 Realito Ave. (LLA 2006-0079) (loppini, Bevans Family Trust, Rasband Family Trust) ■ Description: A lot line adjustment changing the configuration of three lots. No additional lots were created. ■ Fiscal Impact: None. Recommendations: Council accept and approve Final Parcel Map 2006- 0150 (Parcel Map AT 06-0114). [Public Works] 5. Final Acceptance of Public Improvements for Tract 2002-0026 / Landscape Maintenance Award and Park Maintenance Agreement (Apple Valley) . ■ Fiscal Impact: The City is responsible for 50% (estimated at $35,210 per year) of the cost of maintaining the park. The Landscaping contracts are estimated at $35,400 per year. The funding agreement will reimburse the City $125,000 over five years. ■ Recommendations: Council: 1. Adopt Draft Resolution, accepting the public improvements, certifying completion of the required public improvements, and releasing the bonds for Tract 2002-0026; and, 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Gilberts Landscape's for the maintenance and upkeep of landscaping in the Apple Valley, Landscape and Lighting Assessment District; and, 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a five-year funding agreement with Midland Pacific Building Corporation for the maintenance and upkeep of Apple Valley Park. [Public Works] MOTION: By Council Member Clay and seconded by Council Member Beraud to approve Items #A-1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll -call vote. (Item #A-5.1 Resolution No. 2007-006, Item #A-5.2 Contract No. 2007-003, Item #A-5.3 Contract No. 2007-004) • CC Draft Minutes 02/27/07 28 Page 4 of 11 • B. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. Historic Atascadero Printery Building Restoration Strategy Update ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendations: Council receive and file the attached report. [Community Development] Community Development Director Warren Frace gave the staff report and answere(; questions of Council. Mayor Luna announced he is appointing Parks and Recreation Commissioner Ric < Mathews, Planning Commissioner Pam Heatherington, and Lon Allen of the Atascader :) Historical Society, to the Printery Working Group. PUBLIC COMMENT Kelly Gearhart, applicant, answered questions of Council and explained his vision or the Printery as a community event center. Joan O'Keefe expressed her concern for the interior of the building and urged that .h-3 condition of the windows be addressed. She asked several questions including � /ho . would be responsible for the cost of the Historic Consultant, whether this the same or a new permit, and whether the building is still up for sale. 0 Mayor Luna closed the Public Comment period. Director Frace reported that the Redevelopment Agency is hiring the His oric Consultant, and the permit is the same. 2. Community Facilities District 2005-1 Annexation Nos. 7, 8, 9 and 10 ■ Description: Adoption of these Resolutions is part of the final nec& .sary steps for the establishment of annexation Nos. 7, 8, 9, and 1C (the Annexations) to fund new police, fire, and park services for hese developments. ■ Fiscal Impact: Approval of these annexations will generate an a inual revenue to the City of $462 per house, which is subject to an E inual escalator. ■ Recommendations: Council: 1. Conduct the public hearings on each proposed annexation, and direct the City Clerk to collect and count the ballots; and, Council to recess until ballots are counted. CC Draft Minutes 02/27/07 Page 5 of 11 29 2. Adopt Draft Resolution A, making certain findings, certifying the results of an election and adding property to Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services), Annexation No. 7 (Navajoa Ave Planned development); and, 3. Adopt Draft Resolution B, making certain findings, certifying the results of an election and adding property to Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services), Annexation No. 8 (Villages at Oakhaven); and, 4. Adopt Draft Resolution C, making certain findings, certifying the results of an election and adding property to Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services), Annexation No. 9 (Santa Ysabel Planned Development); and, 5. Adopt Draft Resolution D, making certain findings, certifying the results of an election and adding property to Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services), Annexation No. 10 (Chico Road Planned Development). [Community Development] Community Development Director Warren Frace gave the staff report and answered questions of Council. PUBLIC COMMENT — No public comment was received for any of the annexations. Mayor Luna asked City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson the following questions for • each of the annexations: ■ Have any written protests been received and if so do they constitute a majority protest? Response — No. ■ /-,re there less than 12 voters in the district? Response — Yes. ■ Have the property owners consented to election? Response — Yes. ■ Goes the City Clerk concur with the holding of the election? Response — Yes. Mayor Luna recessed the hearing at 8:00 p.m. Mayor Luna called the meeting back to order at 8:06 p.m. City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson reported the following election results: ■ R :solution A — Yes on both A and B ■ Resolution B — No on A and yes on B (Council will be unable to vote on this item) ■ Resolution C — Yes on both A and B ■ Resolution D — Yes on both A and B MOTION: By Council Member O'Malley and seconded by Council Member Clay to adopt Draft Resolution A, making certain findings, certifying the results of an election and adding property to Community Facilities District No. 2005-1, Annexation No. 7 (Navajoa Ave Planned development); and, adopt Draft Resolution C, making certain findings, certifying CC Draft Minutes 02/27/07 30 Page 6 of 11 • the results of an election and adding property to Community Facilities District No. 2005-1, Annexation No. 9 (Santa Ysabel Planned Development); and, adopt Draft Resolution D, making certain findings, certifying the results of an election and adding property to Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services), Annexation No. 10 (Chico Road Planned Development). Motion passed 5:0 by a roll -call vote. (Item #B-2.2 Resolution No. 2007-007, Item #B-2.4 Resolution No. 2007-008, Item #B-2.5 Resolution No. 2007-009) 3. 2007 Communitv Development Block Grant_(CDBG) Allocation ■ Fiscal Impact: Available funds are estimated at $191,570 for the 2007 cycle. In addition, prior year funds in the amount of $50,000 are recommended for reallocation. ■ Recommendation: Council forward to the County Board of Supervisors allocation recommendations for the 2007 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. [Public Works] Public Works Director Steve Kahn gave the staff report and answered questions of Council. is PUBLIC COMMENT • Wanda McFarlane, Director of Caring Callers, spoke about the program and its activities in assisting area seniors. John Lauffer, President EI Camino Homeless Organization (ECHO), thanked Council for their continued support and spoke about the services offered at the shelter. Sylvia Bernard, Executive Director Good Samaritan Shelter, stated they are collaborating with ECHO regarding substance abuse issues and explained the services they offer on site to help their families become self sufficient. Kayla Wilburn, EOC Health Services, thanked Council for their past support, spoke about the services they offer, and asked Council to reconsider funding their program. Joan O'Keefe asked about the Good Samaritan Shelter, what is involved with the development plan and what will be the accountability. Sylvia Bernard addressed the questions raised by Mrs. O'Keefe. Mayor Luna closed the Public Comment period. CC Draft Minutes 02/27/07 Page 7 of 11 31 MOTION: By Council Member O'Malley and seconded by Council • Member Beraud to adopt the recommendations of the Finance Committee and forward them to the County Board of Supervisors as recommended. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll -call vote. 4. City Wayfinding Program (Citywide, City of Atascadero) PLN 2006-1180 ■ Description: Review and approval of Wayfinding Committee recommendations concerning signage to provide vehicular and pedestrian guidance to destinations of interest throughout the City. Fiscal Impact: There is no proposed phasing or funding of the wayfinding program included with this report. ■ Recommendation: The Wayfinding Committee recommends Council approve Draft Resolution A, adopting the Atascadero Wayfinding Program, to be implemented as funding becomes available. [Community Development] Deputy Community Development Director Steve McHarris gave the staff report and answered questions of Council. Pierre Rademaker, consultant, gave the design presentation and answered questions of Council • PUBLIC COMMENT Jay DeCou spoke about the importance of signage and stated that the sign on the Freeway is too small. He recommended a gift catalogue campaign to raise funds. Steve Martin, Executive Director Atascadero Main Street, stated Main Street supports this type of program for the downtown and commented that this type of signage is essential for promoting tourism as a revenue source for the city. Joanne Main, Executive Director Atascadero Chamber of Commerce stated she served on this committee, is proud of their work, and explained the importance of giving Atascadero an identity. Mayor Luna closed the Public Comment period. MOTION: By Council Member O'Malley and seconded by Council Member Clay to approve Draft Resolution A, adopting the Atascadero Wayfinding Program, to be implemented as funding becomes available, and to continue to work on a plan to have this funded through public/private partnerships when possible. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll -call vote. (Resolution No. 2007-010) CC Draft Minutes 02/27/07 32 Page 8 of 11 . 5. Fiscal Year 2005-2006 Audit ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendation: Council review and accept the financial audit for the period ended June 30, 2006. [Administrative Services] Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard gave the staff report and answered questions of Council. Kathy Nifineger, Glenn Burdette Phillips and Bryson, independent CPAs, spoke about the audit process and answered questions of Council. PUBLIC COMMENT — None 6. Financial Reserve Policy ■ Description: This report has been compiled, in preparation for the upcoming budget cycle, to assist in evaluating the City's fiscal position and the level of appropriate reserves. ■ Fiscal Impact: None. • Recommendation: Council provide direction to staff regarding the financial reserve policy. [Administrative Services] Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard gave the staff report and answered questions of Council. PUBLIC COMMENT — None Council Member Clay stated he believes the city has had a good policy in recent years and spoke in favor of staying the course. Council Member O'Malley expressed concern with the current financial situation in terms of the recent economic downturn and recommended the city not reduce its reserves at this time. Council Member Beraud indicated the city should stay the course in terms of maintaining a large reserve to complete projects currently underway. Mayor Luna stated he concurs with retaining a large reserve, which can give the city opportunities such as Paloma Park. He stated the economy is going south and the city must have a conservative fiscal policy. Mayor Pro Tem Brennler stated that continuing a substantial reserve is the prudent thing to do. CC Draft Minutes 02/27/07 Page 9 of 11 33 7. Request to Rename Traffic Way • ■ Description: Atascadero Main Street Association Board of Directors has requested that the City change the name of Traffic Way between EI Camino Real and Tunitas Avenue. ■ Fiscal Impact: Unknown at this time. ■ Recommendation: Council direct staff on how to proceed with the request from the Atascadero Main Street Association to rename Traffic Way. [City Manager] MOTION: By Council Member Clay and seconded by Council Member O'Malley to continue Item #B-7 to the March 13, 2007 City Council Meeting. Motion passed 5:0 by a voice vote. C. COMMITTEE REPORTS: Mayor Luna 1. Finance Committee: Discussed the CDBG funds last week. Mayor Pro Tem Brennler 1. Air Pollution Control District (APCD): There will be new state requirements for agricultural engines, and on March 1, 12:00 noon at the APCD office there will be a workshop where the community can learn about the new state requirements and available grant information. Council Member Beraud 1. City / Schools Committee: Learned about the school lunch program; the state has adopted healthier guidelines. The Atascadero Athletic Foundation is considering two projects: a pool and putting in artificial turf for the upper fields above the stadium. Council Member Clay 1. City / Schools Committee: Regarding developing ball fields at San Benito, they spoke with the Youth Football organization and asked them to prepare something for their school board meeting. To date they have not heard back. Council Member O'Malley 1. S.L.O. Council of Governments (SLOCOG) / S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority (SLORTA): The 101/41 interchange is on target, and the city is getting some help for landscaping costs. At the state level there is support for the local recommendation to put major funding into Highway 46. There is also support from SLOCOG for the regional transit application. 2. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC): Emphasis has been on tourism, and a sub committee is producing a wine study. There will also • be a presentation tomorrow from John King regarding a Black Ranch Resort CC Draft Minutes 02/27/07 34 Page 10 of 11 and conference center. Council Member O'Malley will be distributing a brochure at the meeting highlighting activities and public/private partnerships in Atascadero. D. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: City Manager City Manager Wade McKinney asked for two volunteers for the next Business visit scheduled for March 9th. An email will be sent tomorrow to remind Council that there will be a California Summit for Safe Communities scheduled for March 19th in Sacramento. Mr. McKinney distributed his follow up notes from the Strategic Planning Session, reviewed these and stated staff will be developing action plans from this with ideas that can be used for all departments that will further these objectives. E. ADJOURNMENT: . Mayor Luna adjourned the meeting at 10:12 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council on March 13, 2007 • MINUTES PREPARED BY: Grace Pucci, Deputy City Clerk CC Draft Minutes 02/27/07 Pagel 1 of 11 35 • • 36 • ITEM NUMBER: A - 4 DATE: 04/10/07 CITY OF ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES Tuesday, March 13, 2007,7:00 P.M. REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M. Mayor Luna called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and Girl Scout Troop 479 led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Council Members Beraud, Clay, O'Malley, Brennler and Mayor Luna Absent: None Others Present: City Clerk / Assistant to City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson, Deputy City Clerk Grace Pucci Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manager Jim Lewis, Community Development Director Warren Frace, Community Services Director Brady Cherry, Police Chief John Couch, Fire Chief Kurt Stone, Deputy Public Works Director Geoff English, and City Attorney Patrick Enright. COMMUNITY FORUM: Jason Byard, representing the Ministerial Association, led those present in prayer. Joanne Main, Executive Director Atascadero Chamber of Commerce, announced that the Chamber is hosting the Empower Hour on March 20th, 7:30 a.m. at the Carlton Hotel, and Dave Rasmussen of Cal Trans will address the meeting regarding the highway realignment. CC Draft Minutes 03/13/07 Page 1 of 9 37 Joan O'Keefe expressed concern regarding the process for disbursement of CDBG funds and questioned the funding for Good Samaritan Shelter. She urged that the process be more transparent in the future with more oversight. Terry Richardson stated she supports Wal Mart for many reasons beyond shopping and employment opportunities and hoped Council would allow it to come into Atascadero. Mark Phillips asked about the campaign finance reform proposals, and summarized some articles he has been reading on the negative effects of Wal Mart on other towns. sorrel Marks spoke about the General Plan and Municipal Code and their promise to protect citizens from the harmful effects of exposure to excessive noise, and to preserve the tranquility of residential areas. She played a recording, which she had made on her patio, of the noise made by motorcyclists on an adjoining property, and asked the Council to honor the promises in the General Plan and stop the nuisance. Tino Santos spoke in support of Wal Mart, its low prices, and the jobs it brings to the community. Mayor Luna closed the Community Forum period. There was Council discussion of the motorcycle track issue raised by Mrs. Marks. There was Council consensus to have staff take the issue through a public process and have the Planning Commission consider all aspects with an update on the current status of the Motorcycle Ordinance and alternatives, then sending the item back to the City Council for further consideration. Council Member Clay stated he was not in favor of a reconsideration of the Ordinance. He thinks this is a good family sport and would not like to make lawbreakers out of those who enjoy this activity. Council Member O'Malley asked staff to clarify that any project for the Del Rio area would require a full EIR and economic analysis. Community Development Director Frace reviewed the steps involved in the process for development of the Del Rio area. Council Member Beraud referenced the comments made by Mrs. O'Keefe and stated she would like more information in the packet in the future when CDBG funds are considered. Mayor Luna stated that in the future it would be appropriate for the Council to receive the full packet of information for CDBG funds. CC Draft Minutes 03/13/07 Page 2 of 9 ! APPROVAL OF AGENDA: MOTION: By Council Member Beraud and seconded by Council Member O'Malley to approve the agenda. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll -call vote. PRESENTATIONS: 1. Proclamation declaring March 11 — 17, 2007 "Girl Scouts Make the World a Better Place Week." Council Member Clay read the Proclamation and presented it to Colleen Palermo who thanked the Council and spoke about the girls in their troop and their activities in helping others. The Girl Scouts distributed cookies to those present. 2. Proclamation declaring Atascadero "Tree City USA" 2007. Council Member Beraud read the Proclamation and presented it to Cory Meyer who spoke about activities in the community in recognition of Arbor Day, and their accomplishment in completing the Native Tree Inventory. • 3. San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department presentation on the Mosquito Abatement Program. Kim Katrina gave the presentation and answered questions of Council. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: Council Member Clay discussed the positive results of his investigation into Wal Mart's employment practices and commented that the downtowns in other cities with Wal Marts are doing well. Council Member O'Malley spoke of his concerns regarding business recruitment and retention, tenant improvements and Conditional Use Permits. He suggested the Finance Committee work with staff to review the permit streamlining process and report back to Council. Mayor Luna asked staff to provide an update report on the permit streamlining process. Council Member O'Malley expressed concern regarding trash along the state highways, and stated a task force is being organized to look at this issue which will include County Supervisors and representatives from each city and other organizations. It was decided that Council Members O'Malley and Beraud would participate in the task force. CC Draft Minutes 03/13/07 Page 3of9 39 Council Member Clay stated his concerns about the Mission Oaks Annex. 0 Council Member Beraud stated her appreciation of the comments she has received through the city's website, and believes that people don't want a super center at Del Rio. A. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Draft Minutes of the Special Joint Meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission held on February 8, 2007 ■ City Clerk Recommendation: The City Clerk recommends that the City Council receive and file the Draft Minutes of the Special Joint Meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission held on February 8, 2007; the Council cannot approve these minutes as there was not a quorum of the Council present. [City Clerk] 2. City Council Meeting Minutes — February 13, 2007 ■ City Clerk Recommendation: Council approve the City Council meeting minutes of February 13, 2007. [City Clerk] 3. City Council Special Joint Meeting Minutes — February 20, 2007 ■ City Clerk Recommendation: Council approve the City Council Special Joint Meeting minutes of February 20, 2007. [City Clerk] 4. December 2006 Investment Report ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendation: Council approve the City Treasurer's report for December 2006. [City Treasurer] 5. January 2007 Accounts Payable and Payroll ■ Fiscal Impact: $2,226,031.78. ■ Recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and vendor checks for January 2007. [Administrative Services] 6. Final Map 2006-0136 (Parcel Map AT 04-0052) 3325 Chico Road (TPM 2004-0059) (Myers) ■ Description: The division of 2.1 acres into two lots. ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendations: Council: 1. Adopt and approve Final Parcel Map 2006-0136 (Parcel Mat AT 04- 0052). 2. Authorize and direct the City Clerk to endorse Final Parcel Map 2006- 0136. [Public Works] CC Draft Minutes 03/13/07 Page 4 of 9 all • 7. City Inspection Services ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendations: Council authorize the addition of Earth Systems, Inc. to the established list of qualified inspection firms. [Public Works] MOTION: By Council Member O'Malley and seconded by Council Member Clay to approve Items #A-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll -call vote. E. PUBLIC HEARING: Interim Uraencv Ordinance Establishinq a Moratorium on Conversion of Residential Units to Condominiums ■ Fiscal Impact: None. ■ Recommendations: Council adopt the attached Draft Interim Urgency Ordinance establishing a moratorium on conversions of residential units to condominiums. This action extends the moratorium for 12 months. [City Attorney] City Attorney Patrick Enright gave the report. 0 PUBLIC COMMENT — None • MOTION: By Council Member Clay and seconded by Council Member Beraud to adopt the attached Draft Interim Urgency Ordinance establishing a moratorium on conversions of residential units to condominiums. This action extends the moratorium for 12 months. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll -call vote. (Ordinance No. 507) C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. Request to Rename Traffic Way ■ Description: Atascadero Main Street Association Board of Directors has requested that the City change the name of Traffic Way between EI Camino Real and Tunitas Avenue. ■ Fiscal Impact: None at this time. ■ Recommendation: Council direct staff on how to proceed with the request from the Atascadero Main Street Association to rename Traffic Way. [City Manager] Assistant to City Manager Marcia McClure Torgerson gave the staff report. CC Draft Minutes 03/13/07 Page 5 of 9 41 PUBLIC COMMENT • Ron Wreesman, Board Member Atascadero Main Street, spoke of Main Street's support for renaming Traffic Way, and about the Tourism Assessment Report and its suggestion to rename Traffic Way because it is not appealing to tourists and shoppers. Mr. Wreesman answered questions of Council. Ann Fletcher stated she supports the recommendation to change the street name and suggested selecting a name that reflects the history and character of the community and downtown area. She was in favor of renaming the entire road up to Carrizo Road. Joanne Main, Chamber of Commerce, stated a name change was a good idea and suggested renaming it La Plaza Avenue or Street, as there are historic maps that have that road. She would like to see sufficient time given to phasing in a name change to allow businesses to get their phone book listings corrected. Donna Hathaway stated the road has been called Traffic Way for a long time and she doesn't see the object of changing that now. Eric Greening suggested that as the street goes to the historic Estrada Adobe, it might be appropriate to call it Estrada Avenue, as there would be a connection with local history. Mayor Luna closed the Public Comment period. Council Member Clay stated he would not like to see the entire road changed, and if a portion is changed it should have two signs, including Traffic Way, to lessen confusion. Council Member Beraud indicated she would like something identifying the street as a downtown exit, and requested additional information on the financial impacts to businesses, the legal aspects, and Cal Trans issues. She stated it was a good idea but more information and public input is needed. Council Member O'Malley agreed that this should go to staff to outline the issues in terms of Cal Trans Signs, businesses signage, etc. and with an overview of the cost analysis. At that point he would suggest sending it to Main Street for their help in organizing a public process for selecting a name. Mayor Pro Tem Brennler indicated he was receptive to a name change but would like information on the cost to the taxpayer. He agreed that Main Street can simultaneously participate. Mayor Luna summarized the discussion by stating that Council supports a name change but is concerned with the costs involved and implementation. CC Draft Minutes 03/13/07 Page 6 of 9 42 • • City Manager Wade McKinney stated with direction from Council staff can create an outline and bring information back. There was CouncE z,onsensus to have staff outline the information requested and send it to Main Street 2. Consideration of Naminq the Recreation Center and Renaming Traffic Aa!y Park ■ Description: Selection of names for the Traffic Way Park and the Recreation Center from the list provided by the sub -committee. Fiscal Impact: Signs are budgeted for the new Recreation Center building. ■ Recommendation: Council review the Parks and Recreation Commission's top five suggested names for each facility, and provide direction on the naming of the facilities. [Community Services] Community Services Director Brady Cherry gave the staff report and answered questions of Council. PUBLIC COMMENT Sandv Jack, Parks and Recreation Commissioner, distributed a list of other names suggested for the renaming (Exhibit A), and spoke about the process they had used. Mayor Luna closed the Public Comment period. MOTION: By Council Member O'Malley and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Brennler to select "Colony Park" as the name for the park. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll -call vote. MOTION: By Council Member O'Malley and seconded by Council Member Clay to propose "Colony Park Community Recreation Center" for the building. Council Member O'Malley withdrew his motion. MOTION: By Council Member O'Malley and seconded by Council Member Clay to select "Colony Park Community Center" for the building. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll -call vote. CC Draft Minutes 03/13/07 Page 7 of 9 43 D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: • Mayor Luna 1. County Mayor's Round Table: It was suggested that there be a special League of California meeting for San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara County to train Council members in the running of a meeting. There was also discussion about area mayors who did not sign the mayor's climate control agreement. 2. North County Water Purveyors Group: It was reported that Atascadero is at about 1/3 of its annual rainfall and that this is the second drought year in a row. Mayor Pro Tem Brennler 1. Atascadero Youth Task Force: 2007 Central Coast Monster Skate Park Series will be kicked off on March 31St and will run through June 2"d. April 9- 12 will be the Spring Break Skate Board Camp. On May 19th the 18th Children's Day at the Park will be held at the Lake Park. Council Member O'Malley 1. Council Member O'Malley spoke about the Mayors Climate Control Initiative. 2. S.L.O. Council of Governments (SLOCOG) / S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority (SLORTA): Received funding at state level for widening Highway 46 coming • out of Paso Robles. 1. Finance Committee: Staff is monitoring the major projects in the community and are trying to be business friendly and proactive. 2. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC): Hosted the wine study at the Paso Robles Inn, and will be participating in regional tourism planning. 3. League of California Cities — Council Liaison: Regional meeting is coming up. E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: City Council Council Member Clay stated he does not like to see the spontaneity taken out of meetings, and Council must be careful of trying to suppress peoples' emotions. Mayor Luna agreed there should be spontaneity but indicated there was an intimidation factor from applause and heckling, and that Council must enforce the ordinances and make everyone comfortable at meetings. CC Draft Minutes 03/13/07 Page 8 of 9 50 • • City Manager City Manager Wade McKinne�r asked if Council would like anything specific on the agenda for the March 26' meeting of the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, and the Commission Chairs and Vice Chairs. Council Member O'Malley suggested including an item to encourage a pro business stance. Mr. McKinney reported that staff is inventorying illegal banners in accordance with the Sign Ordinance. P. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Luna adjourned the meeting at 9:32 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council on March 27, 2007. MINUTES PREPARED BY: 0 Grace Pucci, Deputy City Clerk • The following exhibit is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Exhibit A — Sandy Jack, list of names for park and recreation center CC Draft Minutes 03/13/07 Page 9 of 9 45 • r � J L` 46 • • ITEM NUMBER: A — 5 DATE: 04/10/07 Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Administrative Services Department February 2007 Accounts Payable and Payroll RECOMMENDATION: Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for February 2007. DISCUSSION: Attached for City Council review and approval are the following: Payroll Dated 2/8/07 Dated 2/22/07 Accounts Payable Dated 2/1/07 - 2/28/07 FISCAL IMPACT: Checks # 23743 - 23793 Direct Deposits Checks # 23794 - 23836 Direct Deposits Checks # 109212 - 109597 & EFTs 521 - 530 TOTAL AMOUNT Total expenditures for all funds is $ 45,809.02 206,899.71 40,865.82 210,094.29 1,945,169.67 $ 2,448,838.51 $ 2,448,838.51 CERTIFICATION: The undersigned certifies that the attached demands have been released for payment and that funds are available for these demands. n (-? Aot- Rache'le Rickard, Director of Administrative Services ATTACHMENT: February 2007 Eden Warrant Register in the amount of $ 1,945,169.67 47 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of February 2007 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 0 109212 02/02/2007 A -JAY EXCAVATING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 465.00 109213 02/02/2007 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC. Accounts Payable Check 2,978.24 109214 02/02/2007 ALLSTATE SIGN & PLAQUE Accounts Payable Check 334.17 109215 02/02/2007 ALTHOUSE & MEADE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 4,986.50 109216 02/02/2007 AMERICAN MARBORG Accounts Payable Check 157.93 109217 02/02/2007 API, ATLAS PERFORMANCE INDUST Accounts Payable Check 205.00 109218 02/02/2007 AQUAMARK POOL CARE Accounts Payable Check 146.54 109219 02/02/2007 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 300.75 109220 02/02/2007 ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENG Accounts Payable Check 3,375.00 109221 02/02/2007 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 39.16 109222 02/02/2007 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 1,297.52 109223 02/02/2007 AT&T YELLOW PAGES Accounts Payable Check 262.92 109225 02/02/2007 AT&T/MCI Accounts Payable Check 1,055.43 109226 02/02/2007 ATASCADERO COMMUNITY Accounts Payable Check 31,133.00 109227 02/02/2007 ATASCADERO FORD Accounts Payable Check 2,448,65 109228 02/02/2007 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 182.25 109229 02/02/2007 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 2,158.50 109230 02/02/2007 ROBERT J. BAGBY Accounts Payable Check 154.66 109231 02/02/2007 JENNY BALSON Accounts Payable Check 11.75 109232 02/02/2007 BAY LAUREL GARDEN CENTER Accounts Payable Check 78.78 109233 02/02/2007 BCS, LLC Accounts Payable Check 5,592.71 109234 02/02/2007 BIOMEDICAL CLINICAL ENGINEER Accounts Payable Check 200.00 109235 02/02/2007 BLUE RIDGE MEDICAL INC Accounts Payable Check 42.86 109236 02/02/2007 BLUEPRINTER Accounts Payable Check 367.33 109237 02/02/2007 CAL -COAST REFRIGERATION, INC Accounts Payable Check 466.01 109238 02/02/2007 CANNON ASSOCIATES Accounts Payable Check 8,868.47 109239 02/02/2007 CAPTO Accounts Payable Check 40.00 109240 02/02/2007 CELLULAR ONE Accounts Payable Check 25.30 109241 02/02/2007 CENTRAL COAST SANDBLASTING,LLC Accounts Payable Check 1,225.00 109242 02/02/2007 CERTIFIED FOLDER DISPLAY SVC Accounts Payable Check 696.62 109243 02/02/2007 BRADY CHERRY Accounts Payable Check 423.00 109244 02/02/2007 CHEVRON Accounts Payable Check 2,184.80 , 109245 02/02/2007 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL Accounts Payable Check 180.00 109246 02/02/2007 JOSEPH CHOUINARD P.E. Accounts Payable Check 5,571.2 109247 02/02/2007 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Accounts Payable Check 140.00 E• City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing Description Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Amount 50.00 58.92 2,038.33 1,451.51 500.00 231.75 80.50 210.00 71.86 263.21 790.43 1,524.95 134.69 658.78 116.15 217.50 48.60 2,841.14 539.40 52.50 115.70 204.00 100.00 300.00 109.83 30.00 3,416.15 120.75 250.00 3,700.00 4,216.00 75.00 246.16 7,967.62 204.72 229.17 we For the Month of February 2007 heck Check tuber Date Vendor 109248 02/02/2007 CLEARS, INC. 109249 02/02/2007 COASTAL COPY, LP 109250 02/02/2007 COASTLINE EQUIPMENT 109251 02102/2007 COLONY AUTO SERVICE, INC. 109252 02/02/2007 GUY COOPER 109253 02/02/2007 COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 109254 02/02/2007 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER 109255 02/02/2007 D4 ELECTRIC 109256 02/02/2007 DARRYUS LOCK AND SAFE 109257 02/02/2007 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY 109258 02/02/2007 DELTA MICROIMAGING, INC. 109259 02/02/2007 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 109260 02/02/2007 DOGGIE WALK BAGS COMPANY 109261 02/02/2007 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES INC 109262 02/02/2007 DRIVER ALLIANT INSURANCE 109263 02/02/2007 EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC 109264 02/02/2007 ESCUELA DEL RIO 109265 02/02/2007 EWING IRRIGATION GOLF INDUSTRL 109266 02/02/2007 FAILSAFE TESTING 109267 02/02/2007 FENCE FACTORY ATASCADERO 109268 02/02/2007 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR 109269 02/02/2007 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL 109270 02/02/2007 FIRST AM REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS 109271 02/02/2007 WARREN FRACE 109272 02/02/2007 FRAZEE INDUSTRIES, INC. 109273 02/02/2007 NATHAN FULLER 109274 02/02/2007 GAS COMPANY 109275 02/02/2007 GEM AUTO PARTS 109276 02/02/2007 GILBERT'S LANDSCAPES 109277 02/02/2007 GOLDFARB & LIPMAN, LLP 109278 02/02/2007 GOLDING CONCRETE SAWING 109279 02/02/2007 JEFFREY R. GONZALEZ 109280 02/02/2007 MARGARET GOODRICH 02/02/2007 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION, INC. 9109281 109282 02/02/2007 GRAY LIFT, INC. 109283 02/02/2007 GRISANTI HARDWARE Description Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Amount 50.00 58.92 2,038.33 1,451.51 500.00 231.75 80.50 210.00 71.86 263.21 790.43 1,524.95 134.69 658.78 116.15 217.50 48.60 2,841.14 539.40 52.50 115.70 204.00 100.00 300.00 109.83 30.00 3,416.15 120.75 250.00 3,700.00 4,216.00 75.00 246.16 7,967.62 204.72 229.17 we City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of February 2007 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amount 109284 02/02/2007 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT & COPY Accounts Payable Check 367.65 109285 02/02/2007 CAROL HASS Accounts Payable Check 60.00 109286 02/02/2007 HOME DEPOT Accounts Payable Check 663.98 109290 02/02/2007 I.M.P.A.C. GOVERNMENT SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 13,768.23 109291 02/02/2007 ICE TEES Accounts Payable Check 167.31 109292 02/02/2007 J. CARROLL Accounts Payable Check 268.02 109293 02/02/2007 TOM JAMASON Accounts Payable Check 25.00 109294 02/02/2007 JESPERSEN'S TIRE SERVICE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 77.50 109295 02/02/2007 JIFFY LUBE/SOUND BILLING Accounts Payable Check 100.42 109296 02/02/2007 COURTNEY JONES Accounts Payable Check 141.10 109297 02/02/2007 STEVEN KAHN Accounts Payable Check 300.00 109298 02/02/2007 WYATT KASFELDT Accounts Payable Check 307.19 109299 02/02/2007 LUKE KNIGHT Accounts Payable Check 398.63 109300 02/02/2007 KOCH CALIFORNIA LIMITED Accounts Payable Check 148.00 109301 02/02/2007 ZACHARY D. KOPP Accounts Payable Check 72.00 109302 02/02/2007 KPRL 1230 AM Accounts Payable Check 145.44 109303 02/02/2007 KRONICK,MOSKOVITZ,TIEDEMANN,& Accounts Payable Check 13,326.8 109304 02/02/2007 LA TIERRA VENTURES, LLC Accounts Payable Check 460.00 109305 02/02/2007 LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 16,469.21 109306 02/02/2007 LANDSCAPES BY STACH Accounts Payable Check 880.00 109307 02/02/2007 JAMES R. LEWIS Accounts Payable Check 250.00 109308 02/02/2007 ASHLEY LIESER Accounts Payable Check 459.13 109309 02/02/2007 LIGHTHOUSE UNIFORM Accounts Payable Check 1,030.00 109310 02/02/2007 LOCATE PLUS CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 15.00 109311 02/02/2007 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK, INC. Accounts Payable Check 307.20 109312 02/02/2007 HARVEY OR DONNA MARSHALL Accounts Payable Check 196.69 109313 02/02/2007 MARTINELLI LANDSCAPE CONST INC Accounts Payable Check 793.65 109314 02/02/2007 BECKY MAXWELL Accounts Payable Check 70.93 109315 02/02/2007 MCALLISTER OFFICE PAVILION Accounts Payable Check 426.25 109316 02/02/2007 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 512.00 109317 02/02/2007 SAM MCMILLAN Accounts Payable Check 50.00 109318 02/02/2007 MEGA DOOR INSTALLATION -SOUTH Accounts Payable Check 11,200.00 109319 02/02/2007 MID -COAST GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,325.00 109320 02/02/2007 MID -COAST MOWER & SAW Accounts Payable Check 153.65 109321 02/02/2007 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 422.5 Wt City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing Amount 72.00 112.22 8,773.21 4,702.64 335.00 240.21 80.00 2,771.76 2,504.08 37.53 91.77 3,603.80 3,075.58 893.75 129.67 5,157.20 249.50 2,320.00 196.37 427.50 128.40 48.23 3,427.00 141.58 4,500.00 300.00 17,034.50 2,054.88 270.00 1,094.45 74.76 12.91 60.00 100.79 499,126.95 2,137.67 51 For the Month of February 2007 heck Check tuber Date Vendor Description 109322 02/02/2007 MIKE R. MISLAVSKY Accounts Payable Check 109323 02/02/2007 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 109324 02/02/2007 MTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 109325 02/02/2007 MUNIFINANCIAL Accounts Payable Check 109326 02/02/2007 NCI AFFILIATES, INC Accounts Payable Check 109327 02/02/2007 NOWDOCS INTERNATIONAL, INC. Accounts Payable Check 109328 02/02/2007 MATTHEW J. O'CONNELL Accounts Payable Check 109329 02/02/2007 OCEANO SAND CO. Accounts Payable Check 109330 02/02/2007 OFFICE DEPOT INC. Accounts Payable Check 109331 02/02/2007 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN Accounts Payable Check 109332 02/02/2007 OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 109333 02/02/2007 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 109334 02/02/2007 PADRE ASSOCIATES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 109335 02/02/2007 PENFIELD & SMITH Accounts Payable Check 109336 02/02/2007 PERRY'S PARCEL & COURIER SVC Accounts Payable Check 109337 02/02/2007 PFEIFFER PARTNERS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 109338 02/02/2007 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 109339 02/02/2007 PSOMAS Accounts Payable Check 109340 02/02/2007 PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER, INC. Accounts Payable Check 109341 02/02/2007 GRACE L. PUCCI Accounts Payable Check 109342 02/02/2007 QUILL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 109343 02/02/2007 RADIO SHACK CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 109344 02/02/2007 RAMINHA CONSTRUCTION, INC. Accounts Payable Check 109345 02/02/2007 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 109346 02/02/2007 REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY Accounts Payable Check 109347 02/02/2007 RACHELLE RICKARD Accounts Payable Check 109348 02/02/2007 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SHERIFF Accounts Payable Check 109349 02/02/2007 SAN LUIS PERSONNEL INC. Accounts Payable Check 109350 02/02/2007 SAN LUIS POWERHOUSE Accounts Payable Check 109351 02/02/2007 SANTA MARIA TIRE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 109352 02/02/2007 SCOTT O'BRIEN FIRE & SAFETY CO Accounts Payable Check 109353 02/02/2007 SANDY SCOTT Accounts Payable Check 109354 02/02/2007 MICHELLE SEO Accounts Payable Check 0109315 02/02/2007 SHELL SOUZA CONSTRUCTION INC. Accounts Payable Check 109356 02/02/2007 Accounts Payable Check 109357 02/02/2007 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN Accounts Payable Check Amount 72.00 112.22 8,773.21 4,702.64 335.00 240.21 80.00 2,771.76 2,504.08 37.53 91.77 3,603.80 3,075.58 893.75 129.67 5,157.20 249.50 2,320.00 196.37 427.50 128.40 48.23 3,427.00 141.58 4,500.00 300.00 17,034.50 2,054.88 270.00 1,094.45 74.76 12.91 60.00 100.79 499,126.95 2,137.67 51 Check Number 109358 109359 109360 109361 109362 109363 109364 109365 109366 109367 109368 109369 109370 109371 109372 109373 109374 109375 109376 109377 109378 109379 521 109380 109381 109382 109397 109383 109384 109385 109386 109387 109388 109389 52 Check Date 02/02/2007 02/02/2007 02/02/2007 02/02/2007 02/02/2007 02/02/2007 02/02/2007 02/02/2007 02/02/2007 02/02/2007 02/02/2007 02/02/2007 02/02/2007 02/02/2007 02/02/2007 02/02/2007 02/02/2007 02/02/2007 02/02/2007 02/02/2007 02/02/2007 02/02/2007 02/05/2007 02/08/2007 02/08/2007 02/08/2007 02/08/2007 02/09/2007 02/09/2007 02/09/2007 02/09/2007 02/09/2007 02/09/2007 02/09/2007 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of February 2007 Vendor STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL KURT W. STONE T -BAR -H RANCH, INC. TAYLOR RENTAL CENTER TEMPLETON UNIFORMS TESORO FLEET SERVICES KRISTIN K. THAYER CHRISTOPHER DANIEL THOMAS TRIBUNE U.S. BANK U.S. POSTAL SERVICE/NEOPOST UNION ASPHALT, INC. UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, N.A. UNITED STAFFING ASSOCIATES UPS VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS VERIZON WIRELESS TOM WAY WESTERN FARM SERVICE, INC. WHITLOCK & WEINBERGER TRANS. SUSAN M. WILLIAMS MARCUS C. WOLF MID -STATE BANK CAL PERS VOID JAMES F. MULHALL STATE WATER RES CONTROL BOARD ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN. ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASN FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 401 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Description Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Amount 206.66 86.00 150.00 41.10 501.31 6,447.77 275.00 30.00 804.76 3,375.00 5,000.00 511.69 875.00 4,240.00 7.18 2,782.65 1,763.83 204.00 1,127.17 24,270.00 233.10 60.00 88.50 1,440.00 0.00 800.00 332.00 700.00 20.00 650.94 207.69 11,479.99 272.38 866.59 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listinq For the Month of February 2007 Check tuber Check Date Vendor Description Amount 109390 02/09/2007 KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS Payroll Vendor Payment 44.00 109391 02/09/2007 JULIA E. KORBA-CONROY Payroll Vendor Payment 311.54 109392 02/09/2007 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Payroll Vendor Payment 403.93 109393 02/09/2007 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM Payroll Vendor Payment 46.19 109394 02/09/2007 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEIN Payroll Vendor Payment 77,974.39 109395 02/09/2007 SEIU LOCAL 620 Payroll Vendor Payment 748.62 109396 02/09/2007 UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY Payroll Vendor Payment 31.00 525 02/12/2007 MID -STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 58.00 522 02/13/2007 MID -STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 40,776.13 523 02/13/2007 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 9,189.85 524 02/13/2007 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 674.75 109398 02/14/2007 AFLAC Payroll Vendor Payment 3,961.20 109399 02/14/2007 BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA Payroll Vendor Payment 99,165.44 109400 02/14/2007 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA Payroll Vendor Payment 1,791.81 109401 02/14/2007 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00 109402 02/14/2007 DELTA DENTAL, ATTN: ACCOUNTING Payroll Vendor Payment 8,337.60 109403 02/14/2007 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT Accounts Payable Check 2,589.79 109404 02/14/2007 THE STANDARD UNIT 22 Payroll Vendor Payment 1,686.66 109405 02/17/2007 A -JAY EXCAVATING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 31,553.53 109406 02/17/2007 AAZK, INC. Accounts Payable Check 40.00 109407 02/17/2007 ACTION TOWING & RECOVERY, LLC Accounts Payable Check 54.00 109408 02/17/2007 ACTIVE NETWORK, INC. Accounts Payable Check 6,650.00 109409 02/17/2007 AHERN RENTALS Accounts Payable Check 367.45 109410 02/17/2007 AIRGAS WEST Accounts Payable Check 71.04 109411 02/17/2007 ALL ABOUT PRODUCE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 805.35 109412 02/17/2007 JOE ALLEN Accounts Payable Check 128.00 109413 02/17/2007 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS Accounts Payable Check 194.49 109414 02/17/2007 PAULA ANTON Accounts Payable Check 35.89 109415 02/17/2007 API, ATLAS PERFORMANCE INDUST Accounts Payable Check 205.00 109417 02/17/2007 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 1,070.27 109418 02/17/2007 GINA ARIAS Accounts Payable Check 26.68 109419 02/17/2007 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 43.71 109420 02/17/2007 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 51.91 109421 02/17/2007 AT&T/MCI Accounts Payable Check 859.86 53 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listinq For the Month of February 2007 Check Check Accounts Payable Check Number Date Vendor 109422 02/17/2007 ATASCADERO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 109423 02/17/2007 ATASCADERO COMMUNITY LINK 109424 02/17/2007 ATASCADERO FORD 109426 02/17/2007 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. 109427 02/17/2007 ATASCADERO NEWS 109428 02/17/2007 ATASCADERO SAW SHOP 109429 02/17/2007 DAVID ATHEY 109430 02/17/2007 AVAYA INC. 109431 02/17/2007 AZA 109432 02/17/2007 B.W.S. DISTRIBUTORS, INC. 109433 02/17/2007 ANN BANKS 109434 02/17/2007 BASSETT'S CRICKET RANCH,INC. 109435 02/17/2007 BAUER COMPRESSORS 109436 02/17/2007 CINDY K. BENSON 109437 02/17/2007 BMW MOTORCYCLES OF VENTURA CO. 109438 02/17/2007 PETER BOONISAR 109439 02/17/2007 BUTLER BUSINESS MACHINES 109440 02/17/2007 CAL -COAST REFRIGERATION, INC 109441 02/17/2007 CANNON ASSOCIATES 109442 02/17/2007 CENTRAL COAST CONTAINERS 109443 02/17/2007 CENTRAL COAST SANDBLASTING,LLC 109444 02/17/2007 CENTRAL COAST STRIPING, INC. 109445 02/17/2007 CHEM CLEAN 109446 02/17/2007 CHEVRON 109447 02/17/2007 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL 109448 02/17/2007 JOSEPH CHOUINARD P.E. 109449 02/17/2007 KATHY J. CINOWALT 109450 02/17/2007 CITY OF PASO ROBLES 109451 02/17/2007 CJAA 109452 02/17/2007 COAST ELECTRONICS 109453 02/17/2007 COASTAL COPY, LP 109454 02/17/2007 COASTAL IMAGING SUPPLIES 109455 02/17/2007 CONOCOPHILLIPS 109456 02/17/2007 COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 109457 02/17/2007 CRISNIC SIGNS & DESIGNS 109458 02/17/2007 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER 54 Description Amount 10 Accounts Payable Check 250.00 Accounts Payable Check 1,500.00 Accounts Payable Check 393.57 Accounts Payable Check 2,443.75 Accounts Payable Check 996.25 Accounts Payable Check 30.30 Accounts Payable Check 60.14 Accounts Payable Check 22.42 Accounts Payable Check 650.00 Accounts Payable Check 14.09 Accounts Payable Check 20.00 Accounts Payable Check 117.47 Accounts Payable Check 976.57 Accounts Payable Check 282.10 Accounts Payable Check 704.56 Accounts Payable Check 148.00 Accounts Payable Check 175.80 Accounts Payable Check 1,026.39 Accounts Payable Check 4,978.30 Accounts Payable Check 150.00 Accounts Payable Check 300.00 Accounts Payable Check 600.00 Accounts Payable Check 239.28 Accounts Payable Check 1,656.27 Accounts Payable Check 80.00 Accounts Payable Check 4,984.96 Accounts Payable Check 214.00 Accounts Payable Check 12,853.50 Accounts Payable Check 35.00 Accounts Payable Check 629.25 Accounts Payable Check 153.82 Accounts Payable Check 302.45 Accounts Payable Check 1,030.65 Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check 287.50 240.9210 Accounts Payable Check 179.50 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of February 2007 Check Check tuber Date Vendor Description Amount 109459 02/17/2007 CTM GROUP, INC. Accounts Payable Check 53.55 109460 02/17/2007 DARRYL'S LOCK AND SAFE Accounts Payable Check 172.18 109461 02/17/2007 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 272.47 109462 02117/2007 DELTA MICROIMAGING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 2,562.44 109463 02/17/2007 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Accounts Payable Check 1,451.00 109464 02/17/2007 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES INC Accounts Payable Check 181.25 109465 02/17/2007 EAST -WEST FORESTRY ASSC, INC. Accounts Payable Check 2,500.00 109465 02/17/2007 ED'S FLY MEAT, INC. Accounts Payable Check 56.00 109467 02/17/2007 ESCUELA DEL RIO Accounts Payable Check 252.00 109468 02/17/2007 EWING IRRIGATION GOLF INDUSTRL Accounts Payable Check 1,237.52 109469 02/17/2007 EXECUTIVE INFORMATION SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 20,725.00 109470 02/17/2007 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 536.21 109471 02/17/2007 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL Accounts Payable Check 204.00 109472 02/17/2007 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 429.49 109473 02/17/2007 FRAZEE INDUSTRIES, INC. Accounts Payable Check 135.77 109474 02/17/2007 NATHAN FULLER Accounts Payable Check 90.00 109475 02/17/2007 FURNITURE INSTALLATION TEAM Accounts Payable Check 1,130.00 109476 02/17/2007 GALL'S INC. Accounts Payable Check 337.46 109477 02/17/2007 THOMAS E. GANDY Accounts Payable Check 166.96 109478 02/17/2007 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 725.55 109479 02/17/2007 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 447.56 109480 02/17/2007 GILBERT'S LANDSCAPES Accounts Payable Check 250.00 109481 02/17/2007 KELLY GLEASON Accounts Payable Check 17.19 109482 02/17/2007 KENNETH GLYNN Accounts Payable Check 450.80 109483 02/17/2007 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION, INC. Accounts Payable Check 7,967.62 109484 02/17/2007 GREENSCAPE AERATION CO. Accounts Payable Check 1,250.00 109485 02/17/2007 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 112.16 109486 02/17/2007 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT & COPY Accounts Payable Check 542.96 109487 02/17/2007 HENRY SCHEIN, INC. Accounts Payable Check 0.99 109488 02/17/2007 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS Accounts Payable Check 2,408.76 109489 02/17/2007 HOME DEPOT Accounts Payable Check 409.38 109490 02/17/2007 CHRIS HOREJSI Accounts Payable Check 85.78 109491 02/17/2007 HSM ELECTRONIC PROTECTION SCVS Accounts Payable Check 420.00 02/17/2007 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Accounts Payable Check 660.23 10109492 109493 02/17/2007 EVELYN INGRAM Accounts Payable Check 795.90 55 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of February 2007 Check Check Accounts Payable Check Number Date Vendor 109494 02/17/2007 JESPERSEN'S TIRE SERVICE, INC. 109495 02/17/2007 JIFFY LUBE/SOUND BILLING 109496 02/17/2007 STEVEN KAHN 109497 02/17/2007 WYATT KASFELDT 109498 02/17/2007 KD'S MOBILE DETAILING 109499 02/17/2007 ZACHARY D. KOPP 109500 02/17/2007 GREG C. KRAUS 109501 02/17/2007 LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES, INC. 109502 02/17/2007 ASHLEY LIESER 109503 02/17/2007 LIGHTHOUSE UNIFORM 109504 02/17/2007 MAINLINE UTILITY CO. 109505 02/17/2007 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK, INC. 109506 02/17/2007 SHARON A. MARINI 109507 02/17/2007 ROBERT MAXWELL 109508 02/17/2007 MCALLISTER OFFICE PAVILION 109509 02/17/2007 MEDWORKS, INC. 109510 02/17/2007 MID -COAST GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 109511 02/17/2007 MID -COAST MOWER & SAW 109512 02/17/2007 MIDLAND PACIFIC 109513 02/17/2007 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE 109514 02/17/2007 MIKE R. MISLAVSKY 109515 02/17/2007 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 109516 02/17/2007 MTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 109517 02/17/2007 JAMES F. MULHALL 109518 02/17/2007 NEOPOST, INC. 109519 02/17/2007 NORTH COAST ENGINEERING INC. 109520 02/17/2007 MATTHEW J. O'CONNELL 109521 02/17/2007 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 109522 02/17/2007 OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY 109523 02/17/2007 PACIFIC COAST GYMNASTICS CENTE 109525 02/17/2007 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 109526 02/17/2007 PACIFIC HARVEST CATERING CO. 109527 02/17/2007 PASO ROBLES SAFE & LOCK 109528 02/17/2007 KATHLEEN A. PENCE 109529 02/17/2007 DEAN PERICIC 109530 02/17/2007 PFEIFFER PARTNERS, INC. 56 Description Amount Accounts Payable Check 636.15 Accounts Payable Check 100.64 Accounts Payable Check 51.00 Accounts Payable Check 285.00 Accounts Payable Check 2,550.00 Accounts Payable Check 56.00 Accounts Payable Check 10.00 Accounts Payable Check 16,635.03 Accounts Payable Check 206.51 Accounts Payable Check 515.00 Accounts Payable Check 3,225.00 Accounts Payable Check 309.60 Accounts Payable Check 130.00 Accounts Payable Check 574.00 Accounts Payable Check 3,621.61 Accounts Payable Check 347.00 Accounts Payable Check 1,120.00 Accounts Payable Check 3,609.59 Accounts Payable Check 60.00 Accounts Payable Check 494.37 Accounts Payable Check 24.00 Accounts Payable Check 94.69 Accounts Payable Check 3,000.00 Accounts Payable Check 128.00 Accounts Payable Check 695.62 Accounts Payable Check 5,267.50 Accounts Payable Check 70.00 Accounts Payable Check 749.81 Accounts Payable Check 229.25 Accounts Payable Check 404.60 Accounts Payable Check 25,203.37 Accounts Payable Check 524.50 Accounts Payable Check 70.00 Accounts Payable Check 6,768.75 Accounts Payable Check 70.00 Accounts Payable Check 16,100.00 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of February 2007 Check umber Check Date Vendor Description Amount 109531 02/17/2007 PIERRE RADEMAKER DESIGN Accounts Payable Check 1,800.00 109532 02/17/2007 PLUS 4 ENGINEERING, INC. Accounts Payable Check 83.13 109533 02/17/2007 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION, INC. Accounts Payable Check 66.45 109534 02/17/2007 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 378.78 109535 02/17/2007 PSOMAS Accounts Payable Check 3,415.50 109536 02/17/2007 PSYCHOLOGICAL CORPORATION, INC Accounts Payable Check 300.00 109537 02/17/2007 GRACE L. PUCCI Accounts Payable Check 150.00 109538 02/17/2007 RADIO SHACK CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 71.31 109539 02/17/2007 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 67.58 109540 02/17/2007 REDWOOD TOXICOLOGY LABORATORY Accounts Payable Check 33.00 109541 02/17/2007 ROSSI TRANSPORT SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 53.63 109542 02/17/2007 SAFETY-KLEEN INC. Accounts Payable Check 355.25 109543 02/17/2007 SAN LUIS OBISPO CLERK -RECORDER Accounts Payable Check 64.36 109544 02/17/2007 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SHERIFF Accounts Payable Check 2,251.39 109545 02/17/2007 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY VISITOR Accounts Payable Check 250.00 109546 02/17/2007 SAN LUIS PERSONNEL INC. Accounts Payable Check 4,127.60 •109547 02/17/2007 SAN LUIS SECURITY Accounts Payable Check 990.00 577.90 109548 02/17/2007 SANTA MARIA TIRE, INC. Accounts Payable Check 109549 02/17/2007 SBC PACIFIC BELL Accounts Payable Check 3,248.79 109550 02/17/2007 LISETTE SCHOLL Accounts Payable Check 299.60 109551 02/17/2007 SENSATIONS APPAREL Accounts Payable Check 1,645.75 109552 02/17/2007 JOHN SIEMENS Accounts Payable Check 75.60 109553 02/17/2007 SIGMUND PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC Accounts Payable Check 60.00 109554 02/17/2007 SIGN OUTLET Accounts Payable Check 473.54 109555 02/17/2007 SIGTRONICS CORP. Accounts Payable Check 52.31 109556 02/17/2007 SIMS FIRE PROTECTION, INC. Accounts Payable Check 346.25 109557 02/17/2007 SOUTH COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT, IN Accounts Payable Check 881.21 109558 02/17/2007 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1,601.40 109559 02/17/2007 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIERS, INC. Accounts Payable Check 28.90 109560 02/17/2007 TED MILES JEEP Accounts Payable Check 910.94 109561 02/17/2007 TELE -COMMUNICATION, INC. Accounts Payable Check 176.40 109562 02/17/2007 TEMPLETON FEED & GRAIN Accounts Payable Check 93.84 109563 02/17/2007 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS Accounts Payable Check 56.38 109564 02/17/2007 TESORO FLEET SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 7,560.40 • 109565 02/17/2007 KRISTIN K. THAYER Accounts Payable Check 125.00 57 Check Number 109566 109567 109568 109569 109570 109571 109572 109573 109574 109575 109576 109577 109578 109579 109580 109581 109598 109582 109583 109584 109585 109586 109587 109588 109589 109590 109591 109592 109593 109594 109595 109596 109597 526 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of February 2007 Check Date Vendor 02/17/2007 THE TIMBERSMITH, INC. 02/17/2007 CHRISTOPHER DANIEL THOMAS 02/17/2007 TRIBUNE 02/17/2007 ULTREX BUSINESS PRODUCTS 02/17/2007 VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SVCS 02/17/2007 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/17/2007 WALLACE GROUP 02/17/2007 TOM WAY 02/17/2007 THOMAS WHALEY 02/17/2007 WHITLOCK & WEINBERGER TRANS. 02/17/2007 SUSAN M. WILLIAMS 02/17/2007 WILSON LAND SURVEYS, INC. 02/17/2007 ALEXANDER J. WOLF 02/17/2007 MARCUS C. WOLF 02/17/2007 WYSONG CONSTRUCTION 02/17/2007 PAUL JEFFREY ZEHNER 02/22/2007 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 02/23/2007 02/23/2007 02/23/2007 02/23/2007 02/23/2007 02/23/2007 02/23/2007 02/23/2007 02/23/2007 02/23/2007 02/23/2007 02/23/2007 02/23/2007 02/23/2007 02/23/2007 02/23/2007 02/27/2007 ATASCADERO FIRE EMPLOYEE ASSN. ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASN AXA EQUITABLE FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION CITIPAC HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 401 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS JULIA E. KORBA-CONROY NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEP SEIU LOCAL 620 UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY MID -STATE BANK Description Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Amount • 5,000.00 90.00 87.00 492.10 1,495.69 625.21 1,943.85 102.00 281.00 9,547.50 17.08 1,609.00 72.00 30.00 431,271.00 3,460.00 4,241.60 0 700.00 20.00 650.94 403.57 207.69 20.00 11,479.99 272.38 866.59 44.00 311.54 345.62 46.19 77,085.17 749.94 31.00 40,654.35• City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of February 2007 AftCheck Check umber Date Vendor 527 02/27/2007 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT 528 02/27/2007 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT 529 02/28/2007 BANK OF NEW YORK 530 02/28/2007 BANK OF NEW YORK • Description Payroll Vendor Payment Payroll Vendor Payment Accounts Payable Check Accounts Payable Check Amount 9,156.41 680.26 3,770.01 20,531.97 $ 1,945,169.67 59 Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Public Works Department ITEM NUMBER: A-6 DATE: 04/10/07 Acceptance of the Offers of Dedication for Tract 2495 (Apple Valley) (The acceptance of the Offers of Dedication and rejection of maintenance of the public improvements will allow the property owners of Apple Valley to fund the maintenance of the improvements.) RECOMMENDATIONS: Council adopt the Draft Resolution accepting the Offers of Dedication on Tract 2495 for a) Streets; b) Public Pedestrian Access Easements; c) Public Landscape Easement; d) Public Utility Easement; e) Public Drainage Easement; f) Public Sewer Easement; g) Lots 71, 72, 73; and reject the improvements in the areas of dedication for maintenance. DISCUSSION: Background: On February 27, 2007 the City Council accepted as complete, the public improvements for Tract 2495, a 70 -unit single-family residential development on a 28 - acre site between Del Rio Road and Conejo Road, one block West of U.S. Highway 101. The City Council rejected the "Offer of Dedication" on the map at this meeting. The conditions of this development project included the construction of roads, storm drain facilities, sanitary sewer facilities, common area landscaping, trails and other related public improvements. The conditions also required the residents of this development maintain these public improvements in perpetuity. A Landscape and Lighting Assessment District and a Benefit Assessment District (Districts) were established to cover the cost for the maintenance and upkeep of the landscaping and infrastructure improvements. 61 ITEM NUMBER: A-6 DATE: 04/10/07 Analysis: Muni -Financial is the firm that was hired to create these Districts at Apple Valley. In consultation with Muni -Financial it was determined that the property that is maintained in the Districts must be held by the City in accordance with the legislations on District formation. The method to achieve this is to accept the Offers of Dedication and reject the maintenance of the improvements. Conclusion: The acceptance of the Offers of Dedication and rejection of maintenance of the public improvements will allow the property owners of Apple Valley to fund the maintenance of the improvements. FISCAL IMPACT: No direct additional costs to the City since the Districts will fund the maintenance of the improvements in Tract 2495. ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolution 62 • • • DRAFT RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, TO ACCEPT THE OFFERS OF DEDICATION, AND NOT ACCEPT MAINTENANCE, IN ORDER FOR THE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT TO PAY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS (APPLE VALLEY) WHEREAS, The City Council previously approved Tentative Tract Map 2002-0026, a 70 -unit single-family residential development on a 28 -acre site between Del Rio Road and Conejo Road, one block West of U.S. Highway 101, and; WHEREAS, The conditions of this development project included a public park, public road improvements, storm drain facilities, sanitary sewer facilities, common area landscaping, trails and other related public improvements, and; WHEREAS, The project developer, Midland Pacific Building Corporation, has completed all of the required public improvements, per the Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract 2002-0026 (Tract 2495); and, WHEREAS, A Benefit Assessment District and a Landscape and Lighting District were created to allow the property owners to fund the maintenance of Tract 2495 public improvements, as required by the project conditions of approval; and, WHEREAS, the City Council must first Accept the Offers of Dedication, and not accept maintenance, in order for the Benefit Assessment District and Landscape and Lizn ghting District to pay for maintenance of the public improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Atascadero SECTION 1. The City Council Accepts the Offers of Dedication on Final Map 2495 for: a. Streets b. Public Pedestrian Access Easements c. Public Landscape Easement d. Public Utility Easement e. Public Drainage Easement f. Public Sewer Easement g. Lots 71, 72 and 73 • 63 SECTION 2. The City Council does not accept maintenance of the public or private improvements of Tract 2495. The maintenance will be funded by the property owners in Tract 2495 through a Benefit Assessment District and a Landscape and Lighting District. On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO Dr. George Luna, Mayor ATTEST: • Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C., City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Patrick L. Enright, City Attorney HE • • • A tascadero City Council Staff Report - Public Works Department ITEM NUMBER: A - 7 DATE: 04/10/07 Final Map 2006-0144 (Parcel Map AT 06-0113) 8905 Montecito Road (TPM 2006-0085) (Gearhart) (Tentative Parcel Map approved the division of 1.11 acres into three (3) lots.) RECOMMENDATIONS: Council: 1. Adopt and Approve Final Map 2006-0144 (Parcel Map AT 06-0113); and, 2. Reject, without prejudice to future acceptance on behalf of the public, the offers of dedication for Public Utility, Drainage, and Pedestrian Access Easement.; and, 3. Authorize and direct City Clerk to endorse the City Council's approval on the Map. DISCUSSION: Tentative Parcel Map 2006-0085 was approved by the Planning Commission on August 15, 2006. The Tentative Parcel Map approved the division of 1.11 acres into three lots of 11,662, 13,889 and 22,705 square feet. Staff has determined that the Parcel Map is in substantial conformance with approved Tentative Parcel Map. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66474.1 the approving legislative body (City Council) cannot deny a parcel map that is in substantial conformance with the previously approved tentative map. Also, Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66477.1(a), at the time the legislative body approves a parcel map, the legislative body shall also accept, accept subject to improvement, or reject any offer of dedication. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENT: Exhibit A: Final Map 2006-0144 (Parcel Map AT 06-0113) 65 Exhibit A Final Map 2006-0144 (Parcel Map AT 06-0113) 8905 Montecito Road Kelly Gearhart _ ITEM NUMBER: A - 7 DATE: 04/10/07 C as "s q4R _ g7@ F q F n ® 6�5r N�tl 2 5tS VIE,; g h �f W OF N . ssas�Fs«s ass��sKsq„s«R�::a B N <g / ® kap a�tis au -.8d 0:00H 0- it — "`� I� a iia £ < 8 �Rn ®® I x 3 §R888a R A & 8 tlR � JI S P SRk� I r y yvs�i E I ® M e 785 ON N5 p � Z 1a, qp� E p5 a SANTA ROSA RD• •• C • s A tascadero City Council Staff Report - Public Works Department ITEM NUMBER: A - 8 DATE: 04/10/07 Final Map 2004-0079 (Parcel Map AT 01-091) 9230 Vista Bonita (TPM 2002-0028) (Fredrick) (Tentative Parcel Map approved the division of 4.33 acres into two lots of 1.87 and 2.46 acres.) RECOMMENDATIONS: Council: 1. Adopt and Approve Final Map 2004-0079 (Parcel Map AT 01-091); and, 2. Order the abandonment of Vista Bonita Avenue (formerly EI Dorado Avenue) as shown on the Map of Tract 5 in accordance with Government Code Section 66445j, with the filing of Parcel Map AT 01-091, and reserving the easements so designated on Parcel Map AT 01-091 as: a. For Private Access and Public Drainage Purposes and all uses incidental thereto for the use and benefit of the present or future owners of the lots affected by such easements, and b. For Public use and the benefit of the several Public Utility Companies and Atascadero Mutual Water Company ("AMWC") which are authorized to serve in said subdivision, easements for public utility purposes, delineated on said map as "public Utility Easement" or "P.U.E." 3. Authorize and direct City Clerk to endorse the City Council's approval on the Map and Certify that the City Council ordered the abandonment of Vista Bonita Avenue as shown on the map. DISCUSSION: Tentative Parcel Map 2002-0028 was approved by the City Council on February 24, 2004. The Tentative Parcel Map approved the division of 4.33 acres into two lots of 1.87 and 2.46 acres. Staff has determined that the Parcel Map is in substantial conformance with approved Tentative Parcel Map. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66474.1 the approving legislative body (City Council) cannot deny a parcel map that is in substantial conformance with the previously approved tentative map. Also, Pursuant to California 67 ITEM NUMBER: A - 8 DATE: 04/10/07 Government Code Section 66477.1(a), at the time the legislative body approves a parcel map, the legislative body shall also accept, accept subject to improvement, or reject any offer of dedication. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Final Map 2004-0079 (Parcel Map AT 0 1 -09 1) Sheet 2 Exhibit B: Final Map 2004-0079 (Parcel Map AT 01-091) Sheet 3 .: • • ITEM NUMBER: A - 8 DATE: 04/10/07 Exhibit A, Sheet 2 Final Map 2004-0079 (Parcel Map AT 01-091) 9230 Vista Bonita Avenue Michael Fredrick 1 ` 133HS 1 3 S .� TS AV y$ N S1 5 6 to t \\\ IN \\ \\\ \ ,y�`•, ig r� \\\ \\\\\\� \\\\ \�\ \\\ \\ \ M N ' n w < ' •\�\\\ \ \\ \� \\�\\\\ \\\\ IL \\\ \\ w \\\ \\ dd- Lon IgO XN W Ya V � F\\\ S �\\\\\ \ \\\ ♦ P w♦ Ra�- an ✓ /�1 \ \\\ \ \\ \ ¢gy p a <Z /� \' \\\\\\\\\\\ tl �\ \ \\\\\\\ \�\\\ \ 12 . r e \\\ \ �.\\\\ a x 1 1 R o Z 0 E O_. t m au - a gg� u - Z aaa Y- - `� mp p$ �j7dQ c M Ulf ao. au'I 4 W ITEM NUMBER: A - 8 DATE: 04/10/07 Exhibit B, Sheet 3 Final Map 2004-0079 (Parcel Map AT 01-091) 40 9230 Vista Bonita Avenue Michae: Fredrick 70 / fIIPP� \V�1 0 6 S 7 7 :- \ p, F ata 3Y�pgg ar„ � � gp 6 axppe • EJ e F i B i V1 W .1r mNn 70 S A 7 7 \N • EJ e F i B i mNn OgMON Q! OAC a \ , ppyYy� 4 m \ U � a�C a �qa ¢ 111•• I N Y �4 aag � � .q�� "� �"2 ` MSA •Z 1 3 3 H S 3 3 S 70 • • 11 A tascadero City Council Staff Report - Public Works Department ITEM NUMBER: A - 9 DATE: 04/10/07 Final Map 2006-0149 (Tract 2681) 2865 Ferrocarril Road (TTM 2004 - 0059) (Tharp) (Final Map 2006-0149 creates a five lot residential subdivision.) RECOMMENDATIONS: Council: 1. Adopt and Approve Final Map 2006-0149 (Tract 2681); and 2 Reject without prejudice to future acceptance on behalf of the public, the offers of dedication for all Public Roads and the Public Easement for equestrian and pedestrian purposes, as shown on the map; and 3. Authorize and direct City Clerk to endorse the City Council's approval. DISCUSSION: Tentative Tract Map 2004-0059/Tract 2681 was approved by the City Council on September 26, 2006. Final Map 2006-0149 creates a five lot residential subdivision. Staff has determined that Final Map 2006-0149 is consistent with approved Tentative Tract Map 2004-0059. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66440 the approving legislative body (City Council) cannot deny a final map that is consistent with an approved tentative map. The legislative body is also required to accept, accept subject to improvement, or reject on behalf of the public, any real property offered for dedication for public use in conformity with the terms of the offer of dedication. The City Council, by this action, will reject all offers of dedication. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENT: Exhibit A: Final Map 2006-0149 (Tract 2681) Sheet 2 71 ITEM NUMBER: A-9 DATE: 04/10/07 Exhibit A Final Map 2006-0149 (Tract 2681) 2865 Ferrocarril Avenue Gary Tharp P ru ea:g1;ga�gtEM �\ 1 S� m �r � w3bI9I� h ,•� z 7 1 5 s° P r L� I ot I -ell I r1 og ° s 9e�oAh A uj SAS u� 0 21 RP R wRg�g f �pp w• O 4 8 8 x E$ a Y� a 1ti6 ^I YigG 'i 1, �0�� u� g • k �L�� ✓1 PRO i%%7RI3 SiF / y tl8 r6 -�� dMO�, )/yb J/�/Jdd eBex Ooh ZI<7 Drd E6� asn9a tea Nb3ktn ka �a ' gs�asg�av as ! ac 72 0 ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 04/10/07 Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Public Works Department Adopt -A -Road Program (This program would provide an additional tool to assist with the litter removal aspect of road maintenance.) RECOMMENDATION: Council authorize the Public Works Director to implement an Adopt -A -Road Program. DISCUSSION: Background: The City of Atascadero maintains approximately 140 miles of road, the highest per -capita road mileage of all cities within San Luis Obispo County. The Public Works Operation Division is responsible for maintenance in the City of Atascadero right-of-way. They pave approximately one mile of road per year, fill pot -holes as needed, trim vegetation in the Right of Way, repair and replace signs, complete minor drainage projects, install street markings, maintain vehicles and respond to emergency situations. The Division concentrates on the highest priority road maintenance needs, based primarily on safety and quality circulation for the traveling public. Often times, routine litter removal and beautification projects are neglected due to time constraints and limited staffing levels. Analysis: The Atascadero High School Interact Club Advisor and Atascadero High School Teacher, Mary Corey contacted the City of Atascadero Public Works Department, requesting permission to "Adopt" a few sections of roads around Atascadero High School and pick up litter. The Interact Club wants to organize their and other school clubs in the program. The Atascadero High School Interact Club request prompted the Public Works Department to consider the formation of a formal Adopt -A - Road program, similar to programs in place in the City of Paso Robles. An Adopt -A - Road program would provide for litter removal that is not currently being addressed on a routine basis by City staff. Attached are draft Adopt -A -Road Program Guidelines which provide an outline of the program goals as well as the rules and requirements for program participants. City staff considers the program to be an additional and valuable tool to assist with the litter removal aspect of road maintenance. Some City staff time will be necessary for the direction and coordination of the program participants. In addition, expenditure of 73 ITEM NUMBER: B - 1 DATE: 04/10/07 existing Public Works funds will be required to pay for recognition signs. The purchase and installation of recognition signs will cost approximately $200.00 per sign. 0 Conclusion: Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the Public Works Director to implement an Adopt -A -Road Program. FISCAL IMPACT: Authorization of the Adopt -A -Road program will result in the expenditure of existing Public Works funds for recognition signs and miscellaneous supplies. ATTACHMENT: Draft Adopt -A -Road Program Guidelines 74 • 0 • CITY OF ATASCADERO ADOPT -A -ROAD PROGRAM The Adopt -A -Road Program is a fun and worthwhile program that will give you, your company, school or organization recognition while saving taxpayer dollars. You can adopt a City road and beautify a part of Atascadero in Partnership with the City of Atascadero. This is a great way to promote community pride. T:\CM Group\Agendas- Working Folder\City Council\041007A - ADOPT A ROAD PROGRAM-2007.doc1 75 Who Can Participate? •'• Individuals ❖ Neighborhood Groups •'• Organizations ❖ Businesses •'• Schools You Participate By: i Removing litter, along a designated road section. ➢ Other landscaping and beautification projects. Recognition: Aside from your own satisfaction, there is public recognition as well. The City of Atascadero will place recognition signs on your adopted road. Your contributions will also be acknowledged with a certificate of appreciation when your sponsorship term is complete. Your Commitment: Pick up litter for a one- year period on a section of a road a minimum of twice a month. How To Get Started: ✓ Contact the program coordinator for an application package at: (805) 470-3148. ✓ Return the application for processing by the City of Atascadero Public Works Department. ✓ If your requested area is available, an Adopt -A -Road permit will be issued to your group. Our Commitment ■ We provide free trash bags and dispose of the trash your collect. ■ We pay for and install recognition sign(s). ■ We do not require insurance for volunteer participants. We do, however, require that you or your representative execute a responsibility waiver. 2 T:\CM Group\Agendas- Working Folder\City Council\041007A- ADOPT A ROAD PROGRAM-2007.doc2 76 0 • 0 Recognition Signs rL The City of Atascadero will place recognition signs at the beginning of your adoption term. These signs may vary in size according to local conditions. The decision to place signs, their size, content and location is at the sole discretion of the City. This is determined before your permit is issued. 4 Each sign includes a recognition panel with your name. No products, slogans, phone numbers, road names or directions are permitted on the sign. What Roads are Adoptable? There is a list of roads at the end of this application package, or you can call the coordinator for information. High traffic roads or roads with potentially hazardous conditions will not be considered. • What if a Section is Already Taken? You may still be able to adopt that particular section by putting your name on a waiting list. If the current adopter discontinues, you will have a chance to adopt that section according to your place on the list; or if the current adopter's permit expires you will have that same chance. General Rules: ❖ Do not consume alcoholic beverages or drugs before entering or while in the City right-of-way. ❖ Notify the City of Atascadero Public Works Department at 470- 3148, prior to each work event. ❖ Review and follow safety requirements. ❖ Perform work satisfactorily. ❖ Participants must realize and acknowledge that they are working in a potentially hazardous environment and diligently follow all 3 T:\CM Group\Agendas- Working Folder\City Council\041007A- ADOPT A ROAD PROGRAM-2007.doc3 77 safety requirements. The program depends on the common sense and responsibility of individual participants. 0 ❖ Participants hold the City harmless for death, injury or property damage that might have been prevented by their action. ❖ Participants must be at least 12 years of age and participants under 18 must be accompanied by an adult. ❖ Read, understand conform to provisions in your permit. ❖ Provide a copy of the safety requirements to each participant. ❖ Attend an initial safety meeting and discussion before you begin your project. ❖ Conduct a safety meeting with your group at least once a month. Especially where schools and children are involved. ❖ You cannot transfer your permit to others. ❖ Wear visibility hats, orange vests and gloves whenever you are in the City right-of-way or on City property- put them on ahead of time. ••• Wear sturdy shoes or boots. ❖ Light-colored clothing, long -sleeve shirts and long pants and sunscreen are suggested. BEWARE OF POISON OAK. ❖ Do not work when it is raining or foggy or when the street, sidewalk or road in your work area is wet or icy. ❖ Discontinue your work before dusk. ❖ Do not touch potentially hazardous materials such as chemicals, weapons, sharp objects or dead animals. ❖ Avoid overexertion and drink plenty of water. • 4 T:\CM Group\Agendas- Working Folder\City Council\041007A - ADOPT A ROAD PROGRAM-2007.doc4 • Access and Parking Rules: ➢ Park outside the City right-of-way and walk to your designated area, whenever possible. ➢ If you drive to designated work areas consolidate people into as few vehicles as possible. ➢ Vehicles used to transport workers, equipment or materials to work areas may be temporarily parked in the right-of-way to unload and load workers and equipment - then must be moved to a safe out-of-the-way area. ➢ Never park on a bridge, in an underpass or on any other structures. ➢ Do not park in grassy areas where your vehicle's exhaust system could start a fire. ➢ If you are working some distance from your vehicle, display a copy of your permit in your vehicle's windshield for Police . identification. Improperly parked vehicles may be ticketed or towed by the City Police. When you leave a work site in your vehicle, use your signals, consider the speed of the traffic, wait for an adequate gap in traffic and pull onto the pavement carefully. When on Foot Rules: ✓ Exit and enter your vehicle on the side away from the traffic whenever possible. ✓ Walk and work facing oncoming traffic wherever possible- be alert and keep an eye on traffic. ✓ Do not walk on the paved street areas and stay away from the roadway edge. ✓ Do not enter tunnels or drainage facilities. ✓ Use caution when crossing streets and use crosswalks and signals where available. 5 T:\CM Group\Agendas- Working Folder\City Council\041007A - ADOPT A ROAD PROGRAM-2007.doc5 79 ADOPT -A -ROAD PROGRAM SAFETY REQUIREMENTS FOR PARTICIPANTS While working in the City right-of-way, remember: SAFETY FIRST!! To protect yourself and others, your group must meet the following safety requirements: 1) Stay off the road, roadway, bicycle paths and shoulders. This includes unpaved shoulders. 2) Do not attempt to cross freeway traffic lanes. Use caution when crossing streets, roads and conventional highways. Use crosswalks and signals where available. 3) Face oncoming traffic as you work and keep an eye on traffic. Be prepared to move quickly, if necessary. C, 4) Work in small groups (3 to five persons). DO NOT BUNCH UP. Larger groups should be broken up into smaller ones and dropped off at different locations. • 5) Do not work in the roads. 6) Discontinue work before dusk. 7) Do not attempt to work when fog or other conditions reduce visibility for drivers. 8) Do not touch or attempt to remove materials that you suspect may be toxic or hazardous. Items to avoid include: chemicals, smelly substances, suspicious packages, chemical drums or containers, weapons, syringes or hypodermic needles, dead animals and broken glass. Notify the City Police Department of the location of weapons or suspected toxic substances immediately (461-5051). 9) Do not try to compact trash bags. Injuries from broken or jagged objects may occur. 10) Wear orange safety vests, visibility hats and gloves whenever you are on the roadside, street or right-of-way. 6 T:\CM Group\Agendas- Working Folder�Qty Council\041007A - ADOPT A ROAD PROGRAM-2007.doc6 ME LJ • 11) Wear long pants and substantial leather shoes or boots with ankle support. Watch your footing and stay off of steep slopes, drainage facilities or places that you might fall. 12) Light-colored clothing, long sleeve shirts and sunscreen lotion are recommended. 13) Do not run, throw objects or engage in horseplay or any other activity that may distract drivers. 14) Avoid overexertion. Drink plenty of water, especially on warm, humid days. 15) Do not consume alcoholic beverages or drugs before entering, or while in the right-of-way, roadside or street. 16) Be alert for places where snakes may be located. Also be alert for stinging insects and poisonous plants (e.g. poison oak/ivy). • I, we certify that I, we have read the above safety requirements and understand them in full. • 7 T:\CM Group\Agendas- Working Folder\City Council\041007A - ADOPT A ROAD PROGRAM-2007.doc7 H 0 • • �E A tascadero City Council ITEM NUMBER: B - 2 DATE: 04/10/07 Staff Report — Community Development Department Eagle Creek Golf Course Reuse Study Session RECOMMENDATION: Council provide direction to staff and Planning Commission on how to proceed with amendments to the Eagle Creek Golf Course project. DISCUSSION: Background: The property in question was originally zoned as Commercial Tourist. In 1991 the property was rezoned to Special Recreation and High Density Single Family with the PD -8 overlay district. The rezoning and PD -8 allowed for the construction of the golf course, driving range and 13 single family units. Eagle Creek Planned Development Overlay Zoning Code Text 9-3.652 Establishment of Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 8: (PD8). Planned Development Overlay Zone No. 8 is established as shown on the Official Zoning Maps (Section 9-1.102). The following development standards are established: (a) A Master Plan of Development shall be approved prior to any development of the site. The Master Plan shall be processed in the same manner as a conditional use permit except that the Master Plan may be submitted and processed in the same manner set forth for the processing of a tentative map. (b) In approving a Master Plan of Development for the site, the uses allowed shall be limited to: (1) Single-family dwellings; (2) Residential accessory uses (See Section 9- 6.106); (3) Crop production and grazing; (4) Farm animal raising (See Section 9-6.111); (5) Home occupation (See Section 9-6.105); (6) Temporary dwelling (See Section 9-6.176); (7) Agricultural accessory uses (See Section 9- 6.109); ITEM NUMBER: B - 2 DATE: 04/10/07 (8) Outdoor recreation services, limited to a golf course and/or tennis and swim club (See Section 9- 6.123); (9) Pipelines. (c) No uses shall be established, or expanded, unless approved pursuant to a Master Plan following a public hearing. (d) The grove of oak trees located on the slope between the top of the knoll and the intersection of Santa Barbara and Atascadero Roads shall be preserved. In approving a Master Plan, or Tentative Map, efforts shall be made to place this extreme western portion of the property into open space easement, or otherwise ensure its preservation. (e) Any substantial expansion of recreational uses beyond a nine -hole golf course shall require preparation of a traffic study. The result of that traffic study and recommendation shall appear on the consent calendar of the City Council. (f) Residential uses shall be subject to Appearance Review. (Ord. 338 § 2, 1998: Ord. 221 § 3, Exh. B, 1991) CROSS SECTION R LGLE STREET kwo_rw If.5 ACRCc U.S. HIGHWAY 101 SOUMMURD .,16 -EAGLE CREEK TENTATIVE TRACT ivli1 2019 A SUBDrASID11 OF PARK RESV. 'A'. WIS 21 AM ANC ALL IN BLLOCK 72. AT SCADERO CAIORy. City 01 Atosc.0.r0. Cdil0.ni0 Ct Iy Of Sw lois ODi", • • ITEM NUMBER: B - 2 DATE: 04/10/07 In 1998 PD -8 was amended to allow the golf course and driving range to take access off of Atascadero Road rather than Santa Barbara Road as originally required. In 2000 the owner applied for a zone change and PD master plan amendment to remove the outdoor driving range and add four additional single family units. The request was approved on April 10, 2001. 2001 Master Plan of Development • • i to, �xsn ITEM NUMBER: B - 2 DATE: 04/10/07 In 2005 the golf course was closed to the public and watering and maintenance of the course ceased. The owner applied for a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and PD Master Plan Amendment in December 2005. The original amendment proposal called for the creation of two additional single family residential lots, a cell tower and a youth football field. This proposal was agendized for a study session with the City Council, Planning Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission on March 28, 2006. During the study session the neighbors expressed significant concern regarding the intensity of the football field use. The Council referred the item back to the staff and applicant to come up with new alternatives that were less intensive than the football field. Analysis: In response to the Council's direction from last year, the applicant has submitted a revised concept for the golf course site. The new proposal involves converting the existing club house into a single family unit on a 10 acre lot and leaving the golf course and its facilities as is. Proposed 2007 Master Plan of Development • • • ITEM NUMBER: B - 2 DATE: 04/10/07 3,546 SF - Proposed Floor Plan - Proposed 2007 Master Plan of Development ITEM NUMBER: B - 2 DATE: 04/10/07 Although this latest proposal is clearly a lower intensity use of the land, the following issues need to be clarified for the proposal to move through the approval process. 40 1. What is the "public benefit" of PD -8 without the golf course? Applicant's response: `The public benefit of this proposed situation will enable the City of Atascadero to place desired maintenance conditions on the property, through this conversion, so that the remaining property will be enhanced and sustained as the City's gateway." Staff is unsure what public benefit the project would have once the golf course is eliminated. 2. What if any use restrictions will be placed on the 10 acre single family lot? • Staff would recommend that an open space and drainage easement be required over the flood planes that cross the 10 acre lot. 3. Should the underlying LS zoning district that permits recreational uses and RV parks be removed from the property to prevent future Master Plan Amendments? • The applicant is proposing to leave the existing CREC (Commercial Recreation) general plan designation and LS (Special Recreation) zoning on . the 10 acre parcel. • Staff would recommend that the 10 acre site have a General Plan Amendment and rezoning to change the use to residential to prevent future requests for recreational and commercial uses on the site. As an alternative, PD -8 should be revised to eliminate Crop production and grazing; Farm animal raising Agricultural accessory uses Outdoor recreation services, limited to a golf course and/or tennis and swim club 4. What happens to the existing golf course improvements like the sand traps, lake, bridges, irrigation system, well, driving range, cart paths, and trees that are spread across 12 separate residential lots? Applicant's response: "Previous easement area for golf course over individual lots have been deeded back to the owners. Each owner responsible to maintain and restore their entire lot now. 1) Sand traps on individual lots will be at owner discretion; sand traps on lot 40 ITEM NUMBER: B - 2 DATE: 04/10/07 proposed for converted residence will remain. A selling feature of this lot will be the potential of having a private golf course area should a future buyer choose to utilize them. 2) Lake — to remain, as above 3) Bridges — to remain 4) Irrigation — to remain 5) Well — to remain 6) Driving range - to be removed 7) Cart paths — there are none 8) Trees — to remain, dead trees will be removed on lot proposed for converted residence" • Staff is concerned about the current appearance of the abandoned golf course. It appears that the applicant's proposal is to leave the site as is permanently. Many of the non native trees were dependent on the irrigation of the turf and will probably slowly decline and die without supplemental irrigation. 5. Is the new fencing acceptable? Applicant's response: "[The fencing is] permanent. There will be landscape treatment (vines, rose bushes or similar) planted along the fencing." • Staff would recommend that landscaping and irrigation of the fencing be a project requirement. 6. What will happen with the golf course shop and storage buildings? • Applicant's response: "These buildings will remain. They will become residential outbuildings (shop, shed, etc.)." • Staff is concerned about the large shop building on Atascadero Avenue. This building is over 2000 square feet and looks like a house on the exterior. At a minimum, clear deed restrictions for this building will be needed to prevent it from being used for residential or commercial purposes. ATTACHMENT: Attachment 1: Applicant's Proposal EAGLE CREEK PROPOSAL KIRK CONSULTING 12/1/06 BACKGROUND: City Council had a Joint Study Session on March 28, 2006 to discuss the potential development at 13000 Atascadero Road (A -PN 045-391- 015, 016), formerly known as "Eagle Creek Golf Course". The location of the property is in South Atascadero on the west side of Highway 101, adjacent to the Santa Barbara Road on/off ramps. The site is bordered on the south and west sides by Eagle Ranch, the east side by Highway 101, and large lot residential development along the northern portions of the site (RS: 2.5-10 acre lot minimum). Adjacent residential development includes 18 homes, 13 one-half acre parcels to west of the golf course (Tract 2049 / 2279), four 1.5 acre lots (Tract 2415) and one +/- 2.0 acre parcel on the south side of the golf course. The proposal discussed at the workshop included the modification of the existing use(s) of the property, formerly known as Eagle Creek Golf Course. The property is composed of an overall 9.93 acres that is currently designated as Commercial Recreation (CREC) under the General Plan Mixed Use Land Use Designation section with a corresponding zoning district as Special Recreation "LS", with Planned Development "PD -8" and Flood Hazard "FH" overlays. The proposal presented at the workshop included the following components: • Conversion of the existing maintenance building to residential use (interior alterations only) • Conversion / modification of the existing club house facilities(s) to a single family residence including the construction of a new garage; • Zone Text Amendment to modify allowed uses within PD -8 overlay, • Youth recreational field, home and visitor seating, small concession stand, parking for recreational uses. • Co -location cellular facility • Environmental Enhancement/Mitigation project areas In order to process this proposal the following entitlements would be required for approval: • General Plan Amendment • Zone Change • Tentative Parcel Map • Conditional Use Permit .W • At the Joint Study Session, Council members had the opportunity to hear from the public including the applicant, youth football affiliates, and neighbors. The overall neighborhood consensus seemed to agree that they did not want to see a youth recreational field in their back yard. Neighbors expressed concerns that they enjoyed the golf course, "open area"; adjacent to their property and that their focal reasoning for purchasing a home in the neighborhood was driven by this amenity. Neighborhood consensus expressed the wish to see the prior golf course remain as open landscape. Youth football affiliates expressed their desire and need for a youth recreational field in Atascadero and even North County. Leaders within the youth football organization as well as coaches and team members voiced their opinions as to why a field is needed in the area and how they appreciated the applicant for proposing the generous idea. As a result of the public comment period, City Council members concluded that the recreational field may not be the best alternative for this site. Council directed the applicant to come up with additional alternatives to bring to Council and the public at another joint study session. Several alternatives have been evaluated 13y the applicant and one of these seems to be the most logical for proposal for the site at this time. This alternative is further explained below and will be evaluated by staff and then forwarded on to a City Council public workshop for discussion and recommendations from Council. 91 Proposal: • Conversion / modification of the existing club house facilities(s) to a single family residence including the construction of a new garage The existing clubhouse facility is on 9.9 acres. This proposal does not propose to adjust existing property lines or parcel size. The property has an existing workshop building that fronts Atascadero Road. Maintenance of the parcel will be provided by the owner. The existing clubhouse consists of two separate buildings. The proposed residential conversion would adjoin the two buildings into a 3,546 sf one-story home with a loft. 1st Floor - Existing Floor Plan - 'A • • • • • 3.546 SF - Proposed Floor Flan - General Plan and Zoning Compliance: This proposal is for an amendment to the Master Plan of Development (CUP 2005-0025) to allow residential use. The intent of the proposal is to convert an existing clubhouse building into a single family residence and add an additional detached garage. Residential uses are allowed in the LS zoning district with a minimum parcel size requirement of 1.5 acres. Additionally, single family residential uses area specifically listed as an allowed use in the PD -8 overlay. The project is consistent with the city's Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan. 93 justification: This is a reasonable proposal because it provides less of an impact than any of the previous alternatives submitted. Converting this parcel into residential use, would not result in any significant construction or alteration of the existing view corridor. The only construction would be to combine the two existing structures (clubhouse) into one residence and to add a new detached garage. Additionally, the proposal would simply maintenance responsibilities of the previous golf coarse area and return previous easement areas to the neighboring parcels. 94 El • CD $ a r e R e g i gy II li 1 t- 116 G a I S ^✓✓✓ �tG `,1 I ! / r;� 11 � \\\\ t} `'`:7 h .'a�. r.��d. IK•-����iv. �.r lFl�:11 I i'�!';�;� .yf i'r���? fill S. 1 ��r •�, �1i�•+'Ir 1 ' _ \!II 115 _ / �:' ��\ , I u ' 3 ,I �ilJ. .. �•il h � II\ { S• � 4 ':'�!� I • "< �. : � � � _ 111 1'I't'• _ � r' "` t1, � I � 11 - - .•..ln ''lr � !iiir'�I!Il,• I •%'' ( '• i � r f �F I � •' YS I 1 i �'�I'1, �IIy 1, r „ ..V, "-.-,�J 1,.• I�yll''►r ' �i41' II(!IIGi dill all ��al l-- � \ '- iii ll!I,•%��;f it` �j111• .� \: 'Il r; IIUI��'.'t'+,�i �I�1r i C 1 I11\. Ij"1"'ll � 1, 11 � 1 4 ass A .•. II rl II �- 1 r 4�- � �, '• 4111 1 111\`` � 45,,,.:11 � "''' y -j\•. '� _ / � ., y /I� till l _ • 0 as j ng 95 96 Z 0 w LL Atascadero City Council Staff Report - City Attorney's Office ITEM NUMBER: B - 3 DATE: 04/10/07 Adoption of Commissioner Norms (Adoption of this Resolution will create conduct guidelines for Commissioners.) RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt Draft Resolution adopting Norms for the Planning Commissioners and Parks and Recreation Commissioners. DISCUSSION: Commissioner Norms In 2001, the City Council adopted Council Norms for the Council and the Council has amended them every year since during their Strategic Planning workshops. No Norms have been adopted for the Commissioners. Pursuant to the direction of the City Council, this office reviewed the Council Norms and drafted Norms for each of the Commissions. At the Council meeting of December 12, 2006, the Council considered the draft Council Norms and directed staff to make corrections to the Norms, receive input from City staff on the Norms and forward the Commission Norms to each of the Commissions for their review and comment. The direction was to bring the matter back to the Council on the Consent Calendar. The Council Norms will be considered by the Council at its Strategic Planning workshop to be held on May 5. Staff received comments from staff and from the Planning Commission and the Parks and Recreation Commission on the Norms. Each Commission made changes to the draft Norms, and they are set forth in a compare -rite version which is attached hereto. We also received comments from Staff members that were not included in the draft Norms, and have attached a copy of their comments to this Report. The City Attorney's office does not recommend the Council include these suggestions into the Norms. It is in the Council's discretion as to what revisions they desire to make to the Draft Norms for each Commission. • 97 ITEM NUMBER: B - 3 DATE: 04/10/07 Planning Commission The Planning Commissioners made changes to the draft Planning Commissioner Norms as are set forth in the compare -rite version which is attached to this report. Most of the changes are not substantive, i.e. change "hot' to "controversial"; "influence" to "lobby" "acknowledge" to "recognize", but others are more substantive. For instance, in number 5, the original version had the commissioners notifying the council member who appointed them, the change is that the commissioner shall notify the Community Development Director, with quarterly reports to the Council. Also, in number 15, commissioner may not contact staff members regarding "routine" inforn-iation requests. Park and Recreation Commission Norms The Parks and Recreation Commission also met to consider the Norms. The Commission did not formally vote on the Norms, but I have attached a copy of the minutes with their comments. Most of their comments were incorporated with the comments of the Planning Commission and therefore, their Norms are the same with modifications necessary for different departments and meeting times. Conclusion: The City Council may adopt any of the proposed changes to the Norms, and may amend as the Council deems appropriate. is FISCAL IMPACT: None ALTERNATIVES: The City Council may decide to not adopt the Commissioner Norms. ATTACHMENTS: • Draft Resolution on Commissioner Norms • Draft Norms including proposed changes • Staff suggestions • Excerpt of minutes from Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting, January 18, 2007 • DRAFT RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ESTABLISHING NORMS FOR COMMISSIONERS WHEREAS, the City Council in 2001 adopted Council Norms and has amended the Council Norms from time to time; and WHEREAS, the Council has never adopted Norms with the Commissions and desires to adopt Norms for each Commission at this time; and WHEREAS, on December 12, 2006, the Council considered Norms for the Planning Commissioners and the Parks and Recreation Commissioners and directed staff to receive input from each of the Commissions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission considered the Norms and gave comments to the Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this resolution is to adopt Norms for the Planning Commission and the Parks and Recreation Commission. Section 2. Commission Norms. The City Council hereby adopts the Planning Commission Norms and the Parks and Recreation Norms as set forth in Exhibits A and B to this Resolution. Section 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon passage by the City Council. • On motion by and seconded by , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO Dr. George Luna, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torg erson, C.M.C. City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Patrick L. Enright City Attorney 100 • • • • EXHIBIT A CITY OF ATASCADERO PLANNING COMMISSIONER NORMS ( ,20 1. When we disagree, we do it without being disagreeable. 2. We will work to further our supportvomnd trust of each differences on issues or projects y 3. The Chairperson and Vice Chairperare select( Commission's first meeting in ebrua x 4. Respect the skills and persoWve of all Commissio less of annually at the 5. Commissioners shall notify th " appeRts tnern Community Development Director when they, ar to be absent from a Commission meeting. Commission attendancere e,.reported to the Citv Council quarterly.'`° 5 6. The CommissioRers nd Staff should n©teblindside each other in public; if there is a-Rsianifican"kIssue ora ;question a ComilaElssioner has on an agenda item, that Commissioner �shpuld bntact the Director" of Community Development prior to the meeting time p mid A 8-7. Co . 3'astoners shout ; ninform "`Vby Staff when an unusual event occurs that uld be concerned about regarding a matter +n -relating to the duties f the Coo n. $agenda ite is known to be a #Gtcontroversial issue Gall contact the Direc� f Commu` Development to let him know. 8 9. There shall mutu��l respect Prem-bethbetween Staff and Commissioners of their respectiv s and responsibilities. 10. Commissioners shall w}e�erecognize the Council as policy makers and Staff as administering the Council's adopted policies. 8 11. Commissioners shall not attempt to coerce or +nfleer+oelo� by Staff in the making of appointments, the awarding of contracts, the selection of consultants, the processing of development applications, and the granting of City licenses or permits. Individual Commissioners shall not attempt to change or interfere with the operating policies and practices of any City department. 101 City of Atascadero Commissioner Norms Page 2 44-12. If a Commissioner visits a s;te has ex parte contact or receives information and evidence on any quasi-judicial matter pending befoTe the Commission, the Commissioner shall disclose all such information and/ evidence acquired from such contacts, which is not otherwise included 01,4he written or oral Staff report during the public hearing and before the public comment period is opened. Matters are "pending" when an application has been filed 42713. Commissioners may, but are not required to.,„,clarify their votes' hep voting. No”N 5"�gr x-14. Commission Agendas and Staff Repgs • Include as much information asflgpossble • JJs Include summaries and provt"tback-up information • No late reports • Work to have"agendas out by the Wednesday prior to the 4-4715. Commissioner relations with City • Commissioners will may co `ct anv staff member regarding information requests Commissioners ill roti (controversial issbes .through the Director of Community � a -UQ,veloprnent Comms,stoner all notattend internal Staff meetings or meetings betweenSIA ,. Staff afihird persons unless invited by City Staff or 0 11 directed by� ' ouncil or Commission to do so. i�. AM,( ` i 4-5 1 16. Commir Conduct during Public Meetings ,x • Be"O" "Icoming to speakers and treat them with care and respect ,g . • Be fair and equitable in allocating public hearing time to individual speakers • Give the appearaRGe efPractice active listening • Ask for clarification, but avoid debate and argument with the public a --f• The chair shall enforce decorum rules during the meeting for the Commission and public 102 • • • City of Atascadero Commissioner Norms Page 3 • The Commission will conduct the m of Order. 17. Commissioners shall comply with eeG#GRSecti Municipal _Code. 4--715. The City Council and Plannrn peFiGd; annualI . 19. Commissioners shall with an employee. low 05 of the Atascadero will revieWt1i.ese norms Director 103 EXHIBIT B 0 CITY OF ATASCADERO PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSIONER NORMS ( , 2007) 1. When we disagree, we do it without being disagreeable. 2. We will work to further our supportt;�nd trust of each other %' ardless of Nfll differences on issues or projects. 3. The Chairperson and Vice Chairpers`o��„ ,ariei ` selected annually at the Commissions first meeting in February., 4. Respect the skills and perspective of all Commissionets 1�k31 5. Commissions. hall notify the Comm ,uni dwvices Director whethe Gemm* n eedsthey are going to be absent 4frocecit!! a , r mission meeting. Commission attendance records will be reported dR „unci! uarterly. a ,. quarterly. 5-6. The Commis yrs. d Staff should n6t blindside each other in public; if there is ansi nifica l sue or '.question a Corm aissioner has on an agenda item, that Commissione ould r .ntact the Directo7 of Community Services prior to the meetina timer) rr &7. Co � ssioners should' 'nformeby Staff when an unusual event occurs that ui1,,{it r die putlre��uld be con d about regarding a matter relating to the duties of Sithe Commig 8. h%6µagenda items ,pis known to be a #etcontroversial issue-eaII contact the Dire6Cof Commuhity Services to let him know. 8-.9. There shall' be_ mutual respect from bethbetween Staff and Commissioners of their respectiv`6,`*q sand responsibilities. x:10. Commissioners shall aGkRew-ledgere nine the Council as policy makers and Staff as administering the Council's adopted policies. 4-9 11. Commissioners shall not attempt to coerce or lobby Staff in the making of appointments, the awarding of contracts, the selection of consultants, the processing of development applications, and the granting of City licenses or permits. Individual Commissioners shall not attempt to change or interfere with the operating policies and practices of any City department. 104 • • • City of Atascadero Commissioner Norms Page 2 4-1-12. If a Commissioner visits a ex parte contact or receives information and evidence on any quasi-judicial matter pending before the Commission, the Commissioner shall disclose all such information andlfz,�evidence acquired from such contacts, which is not otherwise included ina written or oral Staff report during the public hearing and before the pubc�cin3ment period is opened. Matters are "pending" when an application has beon filed`$ 4-2-.13. Commissioners may, but are not required, clarify their votes % en voting. « . �,:,.. 414. Commission Agendas and Staff Repo • Include as much informations poss,i;I • U-selnclude summaries and provitack=up information • No late reports • Work to have.,gendas out by he Wednesday prior to th 44:15. Commissioner relations with • Commissioners w4 rewtine information ay � � Fany staff member regarding aq ests`f`� and Commissioners al i sues through the Director of Community services • Cor friJssie' s�shall not attend internal Staff meetings or meetings between�ity 9i :Sand 4hird persons unless invited by City Staff or directed bj�'� he Council` or Commission to do so. u F �r 4-5 16. Commtsl4goner Conduct during Public Meetings _ • e,w_t oming to speakers and treat them with care and respect • Be -fair and equitable in allocating public hearing time to individual speakers Give the appearaRGe Practice active listening • Ask for clarification, but avoid debate and argument with the public 4.6• The chair shall enforce decorum rules during the meeting for the Commission and public 105 City of Atascadero Commissioner Norms Page 3 • The Commission will conduct the meeting following Roberts Rules of Order. 17. Commissioners shall comply with sest+eeSectiora 2-13. 11.05 of the Atascadero Municipal Code.'� 4-718. The City Council and Parks and Recreation Commission wI ...iew these norms pe�iGdiGallyaD Dually. 19. Commissioners shall n with an employee. the Commu'Aftm Devd1ooment Services of a problem 106 • • Commission Norms — Staff Suggestions 0 8. At the request of a member of the public, the Commission will vote to agendize an item for discussion in the public forum. 15 • • ■ Commissioners will treat staff in all matters the way they would want to be treated if similarly situated. ■ Commissioners will contact the City Manager regarding public complaints or newspaper stories that come to their attention, and make arrangements to speak with any affected staff member before making private or public promises, pronouncements, findings, condemnation, take provocative action, and/or in any other way legitimize unverified information without first seeking to learn all the facts. 107 Excerpt from Atascadero • Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes January 18, 2007 1. Review of Draft Commissioner Norms ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Recommendation: Commission Provide feedback as may be appropriate to City Council [City Attorney] Commissioner Discussion Commissioner Jack stated that Commissioner Norms numbers 8 and 9 are not necessary, and that Item 16, page 20, bullet #3, could be worded differently, i.e. "Be attentive to all presenters by being an active listener." Commissioner Marks referred to Norm number 6 on page 19, and commented that she would prefer not using slang. She suggested rewording that Norm, deleting the first phrase to read "If there is an issue or a question a Commissioner or staff has on an agenda item, they should contact the Director of Community Services prior to the meeting so that staff might be adequately prepared to address such issues during the public meeting." 0 Chairperson Mathews suggested the following wording: "Commissioners and/or staff should contact the Director of Community Services prior a meeting if there is an issue or question that a Commissioner or staff person has on an agenda item." Student Representative Buck -Moyer suggested inserting the following statement at the end of number 6: "Nurture a good relationship between Commissioners and staff so neither party was caught unaware of an issue in a public meeting." Commissioner Ausman stated he was confused by the request for Norms, and has strong concerns about the constitutionality of dictating behavior and not appreciating that people act and behave in different ways. Commissioner Butz suggested there might be an orientation session with a video before becoming a Commissioner, and commented that she is a little distressed with all of this. Commissioner Jack suggested that Norms number 6 and 8 could be combined into one. PUBLIC COMMENT — None We • Atascadero City Council Staff Report - City Attorney's Office ITEM NUMBER: B-4 DATE: 04/10/07 Adoption of General Plan Amendment Policy (General Plan Amendment Policy would reflect current City process in written form.) RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt Draft Resolution establishing a policy for amending the General Plan. • DISCUSSION: In the last several years, the City has received applications for several major developments, including Colony Square, West Front, Eagle Ranch and Del Rio/EI Camino Real. In each case, the projects required significant legislative determinations from the Council, either in the form of a general plan or zoning code amendment, and sometimes changes to both. The Council held a public hearing/workshop prior to processing the applications in order to receive input from the community and to comment on the project. The intent of the Draft Resolution is not to make any substantial changes to the practice the City has followed for the last several years, but rather, reflect this practice in written form. General Plan Amendments The Council may amend all or part of the adopted General Plan if the Council deems it to be in the public interest. Government Code section 65358 provides: If it deems it to be in the public interest, the legislative body may amend all or part of an adopted General Plan. An amendment to the General Plan shall be initiated in the manner specified by the legislative body. Notwithstanding Section 66016, a legislative body that permits persons to request an amendment of the General Plan may require that an amount equal to the estimated costs of preparing the amendment be deposited with the planning agency prior to the preparation of the amendment. (Emphasis added). 109 ITEM NUMBER: B-4 DATE: 04/10/07 The Council is not required to direct Staff to process applications to amend the General Plan, but if it does, then the City may recover all of the costs of preparing the amendment from the applicant. A General Plan amendment may be initiated by the Council, Planning Commission and staff; however, it is in the discretion of the Council as to whether it permits private property owners to request a General Plan amendment. Some cities have policies that specify that the application may be from a private property owner (or the majority of the property owners). Those cities often impose conditions prior to filing the application, for example, the requirement to meet with staff, hold puhlic meetings with neighbors, and complete certain studies and reports. Since a General Plan amendment is a legislative act, there is no statutory right conferred on individuals or property owners allowing them to file for a General Plan amendment and C ,ie the City process it. However, if the City does give the right to the property owner, Bien the City must follow its policies on receiving and accepting applications from private owners. This policy clearly permits private owners to apply for a General Plan amendment, and entails the process the City will follow in processing the application. Atascadero's General Plan Amendment Process The City's General Plan is the only document that mentions amending the General Plan, and it is unclear as to whether or not the City will process applications from private owners. However, there is the implication that such applications would be processed since historically the City has processed them from private owners. The recommendation here is that the City adopt a written policy as authorized, pursuant to Government Code section 65358. General Plan Amendment Policy The attached policy incorporates the City Council's practice in recent years to review major development projects prior to being processed by staff and reviewed by the Planning Commission. The policy defines a major land use map amendment as any parcel(s) in excess of one-half acre, and any text amendment changes to the General Plan. Upon receiving an application to amend the General Plan, the Council would hold a public hearing, often in the form of a workshop. The purpose of the hearing would be to provide the Council and public an opportunity to comment on the project and make any recommended suggestions/concerns to the property owner. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Council would either direct staff to process the application or direct staff not to process the application (i.e., the Council has no interest in amending the General Plan). The attached policy also provides that if the Council directs the General Plan amendment to be processed, then the applicant must enter into an advancement of funds and/or reimbursement agreement with the City to cover all costs associated with processing the application. This includes, but is not limited to, legal, engineering, planning, and environmental fees. 0 110 ITEM NUMBER: B-4 DATE: 04/10/07 • Conclusion: The Council may adopt the General Plan and may amend as the Council deems appropriate. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ALTERNATIVES: 1. The Council may decide to not adopt the Policy. 2. The Council may decide to adopt the Policy with modifications. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution 2. Pages 11-51-54 from the General Plan on General Plan Amendment Process 0 • 111 DRAFT RESOLUTION • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT POLICY WHEREAS, State law requires that all cities prepare and adopt general plans; and, WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero adopted its General Plan in 2002; and, WHEREAS, the General Plan is the blueprint of the City and over time, various sections of it may need to be updated or revised to respond to changing conditions; and, WHEREAS, Government Code section 65350 et. seq. provides that a general plan may be amended from time to time; and, WHEREAS; a general plan amendment is a legislative act and such changes "shall be initiated in the manner specified by the legislative body" (Government Code section 65358); and, WHEREAS; the City Council of the City of Atascadero is the legislative body of the City; and, WHEREAS; the City Council may amend all or any part of a proposed general plan . amendment or zone change if the Council deems it to be in the public's interest; and, WHEREAS; the City has historically forwarded proposals to amend the general plan to the Council for consideration whether to process the application or not; and, WHEREAS; an earlier determination on whether to process a general plan amendment application helps to minimize time, energy, and costs for both the City and potential applicants; and, WHEREAS, the City has an interest in preserving resources and acting in an efficient manner; and, WHEREAS, the General Plan provides guidelines in amending the General Plan and this Policy will help to implement that goal; and WHEREAS, the Council desires to adopt written policies consistent with the Council's practice regarding the processing of general plan amendments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Resolution is to adopt a written policy for the • processing of amendments to the City's General Plan. 112 Section 2. General Plan Amendment Policy. The City Council hereby adopts the General Plan Amendment Policy as set forth in Exhibit A to this Resolution. Section 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon passage by the City Council. On motion by and seconded by , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: U Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, C.M.C. City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Patrick L. Enright City Attorney • CITY OF ATASCADERO Dr. George Luna, Mayor 113 EXHIBIT A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT POLICY Section 1 —Amendments The City Council may, from time to time, following review by the Planning Commission, amend, supplement, change, or repeal the text or maps in the City's General Plan. All amendments shall be reviewed and processed in such a manner as to facilitate citizen participation. If a proposed amendment is inconsistent with other text/maps in the General Plan, changes to these other areas must also be proposed. State Law requires a General Plan to be internally consistent. State Law also limits the number of times that the General Plan can be amended. Section 2 — Type of Amendments Amendments will be reviewed and processed as major or minor amendments, or as corrections. A. Maior Land Use Map Amendments. An application to amend any land use designation in excess of one-half acre in the General Plan or any area requiring a master plan. B. Minor Land Use Map Amendments. All other amendments that are not classified as major amendments. C. Text Amendments. An application to amend the text of the General Plan. These will be major amendments. Section 3 — Processing of General Plan Amendment Submittals The decision to process an amendment to the General Plan may be accomplished by one of the following methods: * For major amendments, a majority vote of the City Council. * For minor amendments, the Director of Community Development shall process all completed applications. • A. Major Land Use Map Amendments. Applications for major amendments to the general plan will be accepted by the Director of Community Development. Upon the initial review of the application, and determination being made by the Director of Community Development that the General Plan amendment is a major amendment, the Director shall prepare a staff report to the Council within ninety (90) days of the submittal of the application. The Director of Community Development shall present the application for the amendment to the General Plan, along with any other submittal and any conceptual plans . submitted therein, for the Council's consideration. The Council shall give direction to the 114 Director of Community Development on whether the Council desires that the general plan amendment be processed. If the Council directs the processing of the general plan amendment, the Director of Community Development shall determine if the application is complete. Fully completed applications for major general plan amendments shall be processed in accordance with state law and this policy, after the applicant has entered into an advancement of funds and/or reimbursement agreement with the City to cover all costs associated with processing the application. If the Council directs the Director of Community Development not to process the application, then the application shall be deemed denied, and no further action shall be taken by staff on the application. B. Minor Land Use Map Amendments. Fully completed applications for minor amendments will be accepted and processed in accordance with this policy, at any time during the year. C. Text and Map Amendments. Application for a text and/or map amendment to the General Plan shall be made to the Director of Community Development on a standard form provided for this purpose. The application for any Text and Map Amendment shall include: • 1. The applicant's name, address, and interest in the amendment; 2. The language of the proposed amendment to the General Plan; and 3. Statements in support of the application, including a list of the present conditions justifying the proposed amendment. Section 4—Additional Information Additional information may be requested from the applicant, which will be considered in evaluating proposed amendment requests. The following additional information should be provided: A. A description of any special features shown on the required map. B. Any special General Plan policies being proposed by the applicant to perhaps mitigate impacts on special site features or address concerns of adjacent property owners. C. Any information regarding the proposed amendment, such as its effect on special site features or surrounding areas or other information, the applicant feels is important when considering the request. D. Statements reflecting the present conditions justifying the proposed amendment; statements showing that the parcel fulfills the criteria for establishment of the proposed district or, in the absence of the ability to comply, statements as to why the 115 presumption against the amendment should be overcome; and any other factors or reasons in support of the proposed amendments. Section 5—General Plan Amendment Review Process A. Pre -application Review Process—All Proposed Amendments Prior to filing an application for a general plan amendment, the applicant will meet with the Director of Community Development, or his or her designee, to informally discuss the proposed amendment. This stage allows the applicant the opportunity to receive informal guidance, address possible conflicts when they can be easily resolved, establish tentative meeting schedules and simplify the process to reduce delays. B. Neighborhood Meetings—Magor Amendments To help facilitate open citizen participation in the review process of general plan amendments, the applicant should be required to hold a neighborhood meeting. The purpose of the meeting for the neighborhood potentially impacted by the proposed amendment is for the general plan amendment to be presented to citizens of the area neighborhoods and for the citizens to identify, list, and discuss issues related to the amendment. Working with the applicant, the citizens can seek solutions for the issues they identify. Neighborhood meetings are to be held subsequent to the pre - application meeting and prior to submittal of the application so the citizens can express their views before time and effort have been expended by the applicant on the formal submittal. At the neighborhood meeting stage, the applicant should attempt to resolve as many issues as possible before submitting the formal application. The applicant is responsible for organizing, scheduling, and supplying all materials for the neighborhood meeting. The applicant will provide to the City information on the meeting date, time, location, and purpose of the meeting at least 15 days priorto the meeting. The applicant shall notify all property owners and residents within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the project and all homeowner associations within 1,000 feet of the project. A written summary of the meeting shall be prepared by the applicant and submitted with the application. C. Study Session. The study session is an informative meeting where staff presents the basic facts of the amendment request to the commission. At this time, staff does not make approval or denial recommendations but may recommend expansion of notification areas. Staff may also introduce other relevant information to the commission such as: consistency with General Plan policy objectives and existing General Plan policies; potential impacts on floodplain, steep slopes, and wildlife habitat; transportation and wastewater treatment facilities; existing neighborhoods and development; build -out potential and urban form; accessibility to activity centers and emergency services; and cumulative impacts of proposed amendments. 116 • Section 6—Staff Review A. Staff will review amendment requests in two phases: (1) an initial review prior to the City Council and/or Planning Commission study session and (2) a supplemental analysis prior to the City Council and/or Planning Commission public hearings. B. Supplemental Analysis. Following the City Council and/or Planning Commission study session, staff will perform a supplemental analysis to address issues not covered in the initial review, to evaluate potential impacts due to any expansion of the amendment area, to address issues raised at the study session and, where appropriate, to perform more complex analyses such as computer modeling to assess impacts on transportation and wastewater facilities. C. Timing. The time necessary to perform the supplemental analysis depends on the nature and complexity of each request. The schedule presented to the City Council and/or Planning Commission during the study session will reflect the relative complexity of the various amendment requests as well as the need to expeditiously process amendment requests. D. Staff Recommendation. Following completion of the supplemental analysis and the public review process, staff will recommend approval, approval with changes, or denial, based on the criteria provided for City Council and/or Planning Commission consideration. Section 7—Severability This policy is consistent with and supplements the amendment process set forth in General Plan p. II -51 et. seq. In the event that any terms in this Policy are not consistent with the City's General Plan, the policies and goals of the General Plan control. In the event that any section or term of this Policy is held invalid or unconstitutional by a California or Federal Court of competent jurisdiction, such portions shall be deemed separate, distinct and independent provisions, and the invalidity of such provisions shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. • 117 City ofAtascadero General Plan Land Use, Open Space and Conservation Element Policy 15.8: Support expansion of the County library. Programs: 1. Work with the County to designate an appropriate site for an expanded County library, including adequate parking. Policy 15.9: Ensure high quality educational facilities and services are provided to the community. Programs: 1. Work with the School District to review land use decisions involving provision of educational facilities. Policy 15.10: Require public agency and private utilities development projects in the City to conform to City site improvement standards. Programs: 1. Support expansion of Atascadero State Hospital facilities and functions only when impacts can be adequately mitigated. 2. Require all local utilities to notify the City of projects and comply with all applicable ordinances. F. Implementation and Adoption Once adopted, local units of government are mandated to implement general plans (Government Code Section 65103(c)). State law also requires local governments to have a subdivision ordinance, building regulations and open space zoning, all of which are tools for plan implementation. Other plan implementation measures are derived from State laws requiring consistency of local actions with the adopted general plan including the zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, specific plans and the capital improvement program. Policy 16.1: The General Plan shall be adopted by City Council resolution. G. General Plan Amendments 1. General Plan Amendment Process Over time, various sections of the General Plan will need to be updated or revised to respond to changing conditions. The policies presented in the General Plan contain some degree of flexibility, but any General Plan Amendments must be judged by relatively fixed criteria. Final Plan 118 Page II -51 June 25, 2002 • City of Atascadero General Plan Land Use, Open Space and Conservation Element The following process must be followed in reviewing and approving any proposed General Plan Amendments 2. Amendment Applications Applications to amend the General Plan shall be accompanied by detailed information to document the scope and impact of the amendment request. This information should include revised text, tables and diagrams for all affected elements. For example a change to the Land Use Element must include an analysis of impacts to the Housing and Circulation Elements. Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, all application amendments shall include an environmental analysis for consistency with the certified EIR and mitigation monitoring program. Since a significant amount of public resources has been invested in the preparation of the General Plan and EIR any proposals to amend the General Plan must document the need for such changes. The application will include a discussion of the environmental, economic, social, or technical issues which justify the need to amend the General Plan. 3. Submittal of Supplemental Studies Any application to amend the General Plan must be accompanied by studies which analyze the Amendment's effects, compared to the adopted General Plan and EIR. At a minimum the following issues must be addressed: General Plan Amendment Requirements • Conformance with the adopted General Plan Goals, Policies, and Programs and the overall intent of the Plan. Compatibility with existing development, neighborhoods, and the environment. Analysis of traffic, infrastructure, and public service impacts. Consistency with adopted EIR and mitigation monitoring program. 4. Staff Analysis City staff will review all of the above submitted material and provide a staff report to the Planning Commission and the City Council. Staff may also request additional information beyond the studies mentioned above. The staff report will analyze whether the proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and whether the need to amend the General Plan can be supported by the conclusions of the supplemental studies. Final Plan Page II -52 June 25, 2002 119 City of tascadero General Plan Land Use, Open Space and Conservation Element 5. Public Hearings Consistent with section 65358(b), no element of the General Plan shall be amended more than four (4) times per calendar year. Two cycles of amendments shall be reserved for City use and the remaining two cycles shall be available for other amendment applications. More than one amendment application maybe considered during a cycle provided it is heard on the same public hearing date. The dates for the non -reserved General Plan amendment cycles shall be as follows, the City Council may grant exceptions to the dates prior to Planning Commission hearing. General Plan Amendment Cycles Cycle A Planning Commission 15' Tuesday of March City Council 4'h Tuesday of March Cycle B Planning Commission 151 Tuesday of September City Council 4'h Tuesday of September Cycle C Reserved for City amendments (may be heard at any meeting) Cycle D Reserved for City amendments (may be heard at any meeting) Both the Planning Commission and the City Council shall hold a public hearing on the General Plan Amendment application, in accordance State Law Government Code. In approving the amendment the following findings shall be made. General Plan Amendment Findings 1. The proposed amendment is in the public interest. 2. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the adopted General Plan Goals, Policies, and Programs and the overall intent of the General Plan. 3. The proposed amendment is compatible with existing development, neighborhoods and the environment. 4. The proposed amendment will not create any new significant and unavoidable impacts to traffic, infrastructure, or public services. 5. The proposed amendment is consistent with adopted EIR and mitigation monitoring program. 6. Exceptions Minor adjustments to General Plan boundaries and diagrams may be approved with a simplified process that does not require additional studies. Minor adjustments would include Final Plan Page II -53 June 25, 2002 120 11 City of tascadero • General Plan Land Use, Open Space and Conservation Element changes that modify boundaries to follow more logical locations without increasing density or changing entitlements. H. Severability Clause In the event that any goal, policy, or program, or portion of any element of the General Plan is held invalid or unconstitutional by a California or Federal Court of competent jurisdiction, such portions shall be deemed separate, distinct and independent provisions, and the invalidity of such provisions shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions there. 1. Environmental Impact Report 1 Mitigation Monitoring Program In conjunction with the preparation of the General Plan an Environmental Impact Report (GPEIR) #SCH 2001121027 was prepared consistent with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The EIR was certified with a Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring Program. The Mitigation Monitoring Program is incorporated into the General Plan to ensure implementation (Table II -7). The General Plan EIR is intended to be utilized for "Tiering" consistent with Section 15152 of the CEQA Guidelines. • Projects that are determined to be consistent with the General Plan and the EIR may incorporate the analysis, mitigation, and overriding considerations into subsequent Negative Declarations. 0 - Final Plan Page II -54 June 25, 2002 121 r� • • 122