HomeMy WebLinkAboutFINAL PC COMMENTSCOMMENTS ATTACHED
ABC CHURCH
M
From:
Phil Dunsmore
Sent:
Fridav, June 16, 2023 9:11 AM
To:
Cc:
Mariah Gasch; Annette Manier
Subject:
RE: Concern over "amplified sound" at ABC Church
Hi Barbara,
Confirming the receipt of your e-mail. We will include this in the public comments for the item.
Phil Dunsmore, Community Development Director CITY OF ATASCADERO Community Development Dept.
6500 Palma Ave., Atascadero CA 93422
Direct (805) 470-3488 ( Office (805) 461-5035 Direct Fax: (805) 470-3489 1 Office Fax (805) 461-7612
https:Hgcc02.safeIinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.atascadero.org%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cama
nier%40atascadero.org%7C1391427a6c2d42c5138708db6e844d44%7Cfa50a07f04724ddca92935f334316bde%7CO%7C0
%7C638225286737198947%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWljoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQljoiV2[uMzliLCJBTil6iklhaWwi
LCJXVC16Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=XNgedoiZQ7710xvRjOmtCmd3z3WABjk6FKapluTXjJw%3D&reserved=0
Dedicated to Atascadero's character and safety by helping people plan and build quality projects City Hall is once again
fully open to the Public. All services are currently active and we are processing permits and performing inspections.
-----Original Message -----
From: Baranek
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2023 9:09 AM
To: Phil Dunsmore <pdunsmore@atascadero.org>
Subject: Concern over "amplified sound" at ABC Church
Dear Community Development dept.: Please deny approval for the ABC Church to use amplified sound at their location.
We own property at , _ Our property is located directly across the creek in back of the ABC Church.
Currently, when school is in session, we hear the school bells and announcements several times daily. Sound travels....
Allowing an amplified sound system in addition to this would impact us negatively and be a disturbance. Thank you for
your consideration. Barbara Baranek
ATTENTION:
This email originated from outside the City's network. Use caution when opening links and attachments.
11 IM ' F 2023
A MAI Z2 ' a),)
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
Phil Dunsmore
Saturday, lune 17, 2023 11:38 AM
Mariah Gasch; Annette Manier
Fwd: Amplified sound at 6225 Atascadero Avenue -ABC Church
From: kcave
Date: June 17, 2023 at 10:39:24 AM PDT
To: pdunsmore@atascadero.org, pc-comments@atascadero.org
Subject: Amplified sound at 6225 Atascadero Avenue -ABC Church
Agenda Item Number: not listed in your letter concerning Notice of Pub
Hearing dated 6-7-23
To: Phil Dunsmore, Community Development Director
Concerning the proposal for amplified sounds concerning the ABC Church,
I am NOT IN FAVOR of this proposed project.
#1 If you allow ABC Church to amplify you are opening this up to all
the other churches in Atascadero.
#2 ABC Church has not listed what they intend to amplify. Sermons? Music?
#3 ABC Church has not mentioned when they intend to amplify. Time?
Weekdays? Evenings?
#4 Our property is located at , and is near the ABC
Church. We already hear the "noise" trom Atascadero High School when
they amplify their announcements.
If ABC Church plans to amplify during the day, sleeping will
become a nightmare for those that work at night and must sleep during
the day.
#5 We must protect our wonderful tenants. They do not need to hear the
amplifications from the ABC Church, or others that will take up this
practice in the future, if allowed.
Kenneth L Cave
1
RECEIVICU
JUN 19 2023
AMN1) n-6037
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
6M
From: Betsy Cave
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2023 12:31 PM
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Subject: Regarding June 20 Hearing of Amplified Sound by ABC Church
To Whom It May Concern:
I am the owner of 4 homes at Atascadero, CA which my husband and I have owned and
rented since 1984. The property is very near the ABC Church. At present, we have 4 families, two of whom have small
children and babies. Some of our tenants work night shifts and sleep during the daytime.
I feel that the amplified i.e. very loud broadcast of music and/or the spoken word will seriously impact quality of life
for our tenants. We do NOT want to lose them due to this potential problem.
I wish to give the following reasons for NOT allowing this to take place:
1) The noise would seriously impact quality of sleep and life for our tenants.
2) In the past, noise from the church's playground has been heard and announcements over the AHS loudspeaker
can be heard at the property, though the high school is several blocks away from the property.
3) There very possibly could be a conflict with individuals' civil rights, one of which (per the US Constitution) is the
right to worship as one wishes.
4) Our potential loss of income and that of the owners at z , Joe and Barbara Baranek, if tenants
moved due to the noise disturbance.
Please consider the health and welfare of the people living in residential homes on nearby properties.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth A. Cave
FRE-CIEIVED
Am N
ATTENTION:
This email originated from outside the City's network. Use caution when opening links and attachments.
1
From: Steve Hannig
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 11:48 AM
To: Code Enforcement
Cc: Planning Commission Public Comments
Subject: Nuisance by neighborhood petition, ABC church
Attachments: scan.pdf
See attached code violation complaint forms. Per code section 9-14.10, this constitutes a Nuisance by neighborhood
petition. Per this code section, the city SHALL serve notice to the property owner to abate said nuisance. In short,
EXISTING activities at ABC are already causing a nuisance to adjoining properties. The city shall require ABC to comply
with code section 9-14.05, exterior noise standards.
cc'd to the Planning Commission, as this pertains to item #3 on the June 20th agenda.
Thank you,
Steve Hannig
ATTENTION:
This email originated from outside the City's network. Use caution when opening links and attachments.
The City has not provided
the attachments
CA
From: Dan Ulrich
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2023 9:18 AM
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Subject: Agenda Item #3, Atascadero Bible Church Amplified Sound
Members of the Planning Commission:
I am writing to express my strong opposition to allowing outdoor amplified sound as described in the meeting agenda
packet.
I have lived on Santa Ynez Ave. south of ABC for 28 years. There have been numerous occasions in the past when
amplified sound (music and voice) has been used for various events at this location. Disrupting and obnoxious are
certainly two words that quickly come to mind each time this has occurred. Have any of you spent time in this
neighborhood when these events have occurred in the past? Not at the event, but in the neighborhood?
Although I understand that the church is in the Public Zone it is also adjacent to a large residential zone and I feel this
use would be very incompatible and not consistent with the character of the immediate neighborhood.
Part of the staff report seems to rationalize additional noise from this use by stating "However, this location is within an
area with very high noise exposure from Highway 101 due to traffic noise". I certainly don't see how adding more noise
to the area can be justified for any of the neighbors, residential or otherwise.
Regarding the Applicant provided noise measurements. I do not profess to be a noise measurement expert by any
means nor am I doubting the expertise of the individual who provide this. But why is this set of numbers being used as
opposed to that of a neutral unbiased sound expert selected by the City? With the information given in the staff report
and a simple search of dBA measuring I found this:
Compared with dB, A -weighted measurements underestimate the perceived loudness,
annoyance factor, and stress -inducing capability of noises with low frequency components,
especially at moderate and high volumes of noise.
That certainly doesn't do much to assure me that this won't be a nuisance to the neighborhood.
The conditions of approval and mitigation outlined in lines 7-12 of Exhibit A do little to change the outcome of this
proposed use. Unwanted, unwelcome and unnecessary added noise in the adjacent neighborhood.
I urge you to adopt Resolution B for the reasons outlined in the findings for denial. It is inconsistent with the adjacent
residential neighborhood, plain and simple.
Sincerely,
Dan Ulrich
JUN 19 2023
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ATTENTION:
This email originated from outside the City's network. Use caution when opening links and attachments.
COMMENTS ATTACHED
RV STORAGE
D
From: Lily Begler
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2023 5:36 PM
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Subject: NO BUILDING ON THE SALINAS RIVER
Hello,
I am writing with major concerns at the prospects of a storage unit facility being built upon our beloved and extremely
important Salinas River. This riparian habitat is home to so many creatures. It's biodiversity is what keeps the greater
ecosystem healthy. We cannot disrupt the important job of one of our riparian keystone species, the American beaver;
who creates habitats for so many other animals that call the river home. They also help filter the water and help to store
it in our ground water. And we should all know by now that water is an essential and limited resource that we need to
protect at all costs.
I am against this building proposal!
Lily Begler
Of Los Osos
ATTENTION:
This email originated from outside the City's network. Use caution when opening links and attachments.
RECEIVE
i.
JUN 19 20211 i
2-1-0107
CORKINITY ®EVELQP 17
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
To whom it may concern,
Cameron Gaspord
Saturday, June 17, 2023 9:54 PM
Planning Commission Public Comments
Use of Salinas River Floodplain Land
My name is Cameron Gaspord and I am a Master's student in the Environmental Science and Management program at
CalPoly. It has recently come to my attention that 6 acres of the Salinas River Floodplain are soon to be converted into
storage unit for 267 RVs. I would like to express my concern for the use of this land for this purpose.
Building anything within the bounds of a floodplain inherently comes with high risk. A floodplain by definition is going to
become flooded- as we saw this past January, the Salinas River is no exception to severe flooding. Any persons or
property left within the floodplain during severe weather conditions are likely to be harmed.
Furthermore, converting this land into a storage lot has the potential to degrade the riparian zone and pollute the
Salinas river system. This would harm vegetation and wildlife in this location and potentially downstream of Atascadero
as well. Floodplains provide significant ecosystem services: they are able to capture sediment and debris during flood
events, and the vegetation within the riparian zone acts as a carbon sink. The Salinas river is also home to a beaver
population which further contributes to these ecosystem services. The beavers were already destabilized due to the
January flood events, and land use change at this location may prevent the reestablishment of this population.
Ultimately I believe the best use of this land is for it to be left undeveloped. The best use of floodplain land is to contain
flooding, and any development atop a floodplain is detrimental to that end.
Thank you for your time,
Cameron Gaspord
ATTENTION:
This email originated from outside the City's network. Use caution when opening links and attachments.
JUN 19 2023
us-- 21-0101
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
From:
Jennifer Ho
Sent:
Sunday, June 18, 2023 9:08 PM
To:
Planning Commission Public Comments
Subject:
Concerns Re: 6805 Sycamore Rd
Hi there,
As a UC California Naturalist who would like to see better health outcomes for future generations, I am writing to
oppose Sycamore Rd 6805 Sycamore Rd Atascadero, CA 93422 being turned into an RV storage lot.
This 6 acres of the Salinas River floodplain is a biodiverse riparian habitat that is better off left in -tact. Degrading this
riparian zone by adding construction/buildings would degrade and pollute this important waterway, which damages the
ecology and all that it supports --from wildlife to humans.
The Salinas River is a key natural resource that should be protected and bolstered. I urge you to oppose building an RV
storage lot here. Instead, please collaborate with the local community to deliberate on better communal uses of this
important waterway.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Jennifer H.
ATTENTION: '
This email originated from outside the City's network. Use caution when opening links and attachments.
RECEN ,",
it -IN! - a
.1SE- 2.1— C) to -7
From: Jen Olivares
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 5:40 AM
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Subject: RV Storage Opinion
To The City:
I disagree with and strongly discourage the construction of the RV storage project on Sycamore Ave. This directly
contradicts the promised protection regarding the Salinas River as a "key natural resource that should be protected and
bolstered as a regional attraction for tourism, recreation, and education" as stated on page 14 of the 2045 General Plan.
As a 4th generation North County resident and a State of California Enthusiast and traveler, I have to encourage the city
to consider the long term effects such a project could have on one of the last regions of California largely untouched by
rapid expansion and overpopulation. Let people park their RVs in their drive way. If they can't park it at their house,
they'll simply need to be able to afford a larger lot to accommodate their luxurious second living option. Don't ruin the
natural ecosystem so the upper middle class can evade the perils of purchasing property in the North County. This is not
a solution to the homeless crisis in Atascadero, this is a large, very unsticky bandaid on a busted pipe.
Thank you for reading my comment. Hoping you'll do the right thing and pause on this project.
ATTENTION:
This email originated from outside the City's network. Use caution when opening links and attachments.
JUN 2 0 2023
USE -2A --0 t 0 -1
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
From: Dylan Pearce
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2023 9:21 PM
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Subject: 6805 Sycamore Rd
H i,
Please don't use riparian habitat for storing RVs. There are so many cool critters (including federally and state listed
threatened, endangered and sensitive species) that utilize riparian habitat. We don't need more things potentially
polluting the Salinas River.
Thanks
ATTENTION:
i This email originated from outside the City's network. Use caution when opening links and attachments.
EIV EED
JUN 19 2n9l
From: Meagan Papp
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2023 11:32 AM
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Subject: RV parking in the floodplain is a plain bad idea.
hello,
I am writing this email in strong opposition to the plan to turn 6 acres of Salinas river floodplain, riparian habitat, into RV
parking.
I am a California native who has come to know and appreciate our unique and beautiful variety of habitats. While RVs
are, in a way, as much a part of the California culture and ecosystem, they do not belong parked in a floodplain.
1. River floodplain habitat should be left as undisturbed as possible in order to preserve the natural spaces we have left
in this state, especially those around our precious waterways.
2. Any vehicle can leak, and even though secondary containment can be put in place, accidents can and do always
happen. Leaks from this lot would contaminate the Salinas river.
3. Floodplains are liable to.... flood. Unless you're actively trying to flood out these RVs for the insurance money, why
would you park them in such a place?
I'm confident there are existing lots in your town or county that are already paved and ready to park vehicles on.
Wouldn't that be a better place for such a project?
Sincerely,
Meagan Papp
Tulare, CA
ATTENTION: -Y
This email originated from outside the City's network. Use caution when opening links and attachments.
Fi4
j'. l Yl 19 2023
t,U S�_: Zl - 010-1
CO MUNITY'DEVELOPMENT
From: SLO Beaver Brigade
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2023 2:40 PM
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Cc: Jaime Hendrickson;jneil@amwc.us
Subject: June 20, 2023: Agenda Item 4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR 6805 SYCAMORE ROAD
(CONTINUED FROM 11-15-22) The propose
FfRl
Planning Commissioners and Atascadero Mutual Water Company (AMWC), JUN 19 2023
Please deny the Sycamore RV Storage request. to St 2i — O/ 0 7
Reason 1. Please deny the Sycamore RV Storage Permit on the basis that it doesn't conform to the current General Plan
Land Use, Open Space and Conservation Element Policy 1.3 which states, "Enhance the rural character and appearance
of the City, including commercial corridors, gateways and public facilities." (Page 40 of General Plan
2025, https://www.atascadero.org/files/CD/General%20PIan/Atascadero%20GP%202025.pdf)
Hwy 41 is a current gateway to the City of Atascadero from the East and this property is in the viewshed of Highway 41.
At the November 15, 2022 Planning Commissioners meeting it was recommended the applicant provide a Visibility Study
with the applicant to stake out the property boundaries. I have been a regular visitor to this site and have not seen any
boundaries staked out so that the potential 6 acres of RV's could be visually assessed from the Hwy 41 bridge. This
recommendation has not been honored.
This Project would negatively affect the eastern gateway by visually impacting the current rural, riparian gateway to
the City of Atascadero which goes against our current General Plan 2025.
Reason 2. The City of Atascadero is currently in the process of updating their General Plan. This project does not
conform with the updated findings of the 2045 General Plan which states, "In addition, the Salinas River has
been identified as a key natural resource that should be protected and bolstered as a regional
attraction for tourism, recreation, and education." (From page 14 of the Existing Conditions Atlas, Recreation
and Open Spaces, Challenges and Emerging Opportunities,
httDs://www.atascadero2045.ora/files/managed/Document/62/AGPU Atlas Revised%20Admin%20Draft 01-
24-23.pdf )
As a resident of the City of Atascadero I have participated in numerous Open Houses regarding the update of the
General Plan for 2045. 1 have been encouraged and inspired by the City of Atascadero in their efforts to engage the
community in the long-term vision for how Atascadero should grow and change over the coming years and decades.
Given all the time, thought, money, energy and input that the City of Atascadero and its residents have already
contributed to this updated plan, please deny this project given that it does not address these emerging
opportunities. At a minimum, the Planning Commission should postpone this decision until the General Plan 2045 has
been completed.
Reason 3. The 500 acre property owned by the shareholders of AMWC benefits the City of Atascadero and its residents
and should not be chipped away at and leased to companies that are not enhancing our watersheds or water systems.
I attended a tour of AMWC's water production facilities in April, 2023 led by AMWC General Manager John Neil. The
tour included well, treatment, and Nacimiento Recharge Basin facilities. The section of the Salinas River
floodplain owned by AMWC is well-maintained and beautiful with native trees and plants and access points for
the public to enter and exit for hiking, mountain biking &/or horseback riding. This large, spacious parcel of
AMWC property was reserved in the early 1900's when the Atascadero Colony began and John Neils praised
the foresight of E.G. Lewis and his engineers who reserved this acreage for the water company to
supply and maintain a water system for the over 30,000 then anticipated residents. AMWC has been
able to successfully meet the water supply for this community and to prepare for further growth/droughts by
adding in Nacimiento Recharge Basin facilities within this already existing acreage because of the foresight
of the founders of AMWC. The founders had their sights set on the long-term health of this watershed and its
ability to sustain the then anticipated 30,000 residents, instead of the short-term gain of selling this acreage.
Please do not begin the trend of chipping away at this acreage for short-term gains at the expense of longer
term health. This project does not enhance, maintain, benefit, our water system or watershed health.
Please deny this project.
Additional Thought: While this area of concern is currently zoned Industrial Parka nd the storage of RV vehicles is
considered a light industrial use, the possibility of adjusting the zoning along the Salinas River corridor in the updated
General Plan 2045 has been expressed at various General Plan Open Houses. Historically, industry has been placed
along river corridors to allow for removal of industrial waste via river systems. This long outdated mode of dealing with
industrial waste still lingers in our General Plan.
Take a moment to imagine entering the City of Atascadero from the east, and instead of meeting 262 stored RVs, you
were greeted with a Salinas River Center, educating locals and tourists on the benefits of this watershed, the Monterey
Bay Marine Sanctuary where this river meets the ocean, the wildlife this river supports, the CalPoly research that is
currently being conducted in this section of the Salinas River, and more. Imagine the tourism dollars coming into the
City from visitors excited to get outside and see what this area has to offer. The City of Atascadero logo is encircled by
cattails, a wetland plant. Wouldn't it make sense to support and celebrate our wetland areas that are so integral to
this City, in this highly visible location rather than turn it into an eyesore? Let's create the conditions for this reality to
occur by denying this project today.
Thank you for considering our concerns.
Audrey Taub
Atascadero Resident
AMWC shareholder
on behalf of the San Luis Obispo Beaver Brigade
O
Audrey Taub
Beavers = Water
SLO Beaver Brigade
Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/slobeaverbrigade
City of Atascadero
General Plan Land Use, Open Space and Conservation Element
Policy 1.3: Enhance the rural character and appearance of the City, including commercial
corridors, gateways and public facilities.
Programs:
1. Update and maintain the Appearance Review Manual to include provisions for rural
character design features, street trees, landscaping, parking, fencing, screening, and
architectural design (except for single family development), with standards tailored to
specific areas of the City, including commercial corridors, and gateways such as
Highway 101 and Morro Road.
2. Require landscaping and/or screening to buffer non-residential uses from residential
areas.
3. Continue to support the Neighborhood Preservation Program.
4. Update and maintain the Sign Ordinance with higher standards for the quality and
visual impact of signs.
5. Develop incentives to encourage existing uses to upgrade to contemporary design
standards, including frontage and parking lot landscaping, and the screening of
loading and service areas.
6. Work with Caltrans to implement a freeway landscape and maintenance plan for the
Highway 101 corridor.
7. Develop a program to abate uses solely devoted to outdoor storage.
8. Beautify the City's primary entryways indicated in by creating Civic Gateways. The
freeway and other vehicular approaches to Atascadero shall be made more attractive
through judicious application of the elements including landscaping, civic
monuments, and rural character site development.
9. Continue abatement programs to remove unsafe buildings, and require the cleanup
of premises and vacant lots with code violations. Clean-up campaigns and
beautification of existing facilities and neighborhoods shall be encouraged.
10. The City will develop standards and undergrounding districts to require the
undergrounding of existing utilities within the Urban Core.
11. New utilities will be undergrounded in all proposed subdivisions and development
projects.
Final Plan Page II -19 June 25, 2002
W
U
a
A
z
4!!4
z
0
F
d
w
a
w
a
L
a� O
L lL
G
C O
ra Q -
L CL
rara
:�j V
_D =
rO QJ
L L
LL-
Q)
-C
L
L LL- O
C O v
ro L L- ro
Lra u
O
a a ro
roE roQ
v � c
L
OC c
L C >
a ro
C
Ln C O
C ro O ra C ra C -Li
ro L
QJ L NQ) D V ra C ro
LL QJ S L >> Q1 C C O - N L r0 N
C E •- > ro O C -Q C Q1 ro QJ o I Q) Ql "-p V
OV N1 fa O ��u v O �-p'd O CL�� -Ln �� u O Q)
O -Y w ra Ql 3 to C to V") L L Q) E L QJ L L -` W A C L
V d �-J C V) Q) QJ QJ r, C ra QJ `_ ,, Ql L L O J E
L 1 C•- r- ra `- -0 C 0 ra C O L
u O N ro ra .0 ra O N N a ro ra ro Q- LL- Ql O 'L
Ui) O v O aJ C L U L O .� v � -->- ro O
r0 U� a L _ N C Q) > C L
L dJ v to L CO fl C� C L •- ro LLj OL L � ra L
iri E o >.E.� a'�� o o Es c�� v a E>�-c c Q'
L. � N� u Ln> O u u U � L Q1 u a �C U C O- ro O
'p L 4J L n O O L >, Cu 3 Q) O_1 L Ln L- CDL QJ L ro a Ln O
C U U > U C O C C ro to > to ro E C L c D QJ r0 ro
y�j - X . C N ra LO In rl'a V -� E S � �W N O i r0 C
Y p n O- p N s L `- O L QJ N a L rp L C
O
0a C--0 O C)roti raLdO r0 O
a> opO U O
U V) O U O Q) to L CoU roC0C vCC
i
v _
ro v 0
V
N-0 r°
a . v
to
ro
L V �
p
Co C
C
L
O
O
=p O
•O ro C/1
c s
C
i O ro
Uo
C ro
O E U
ro L
-0
ros
C:
o C d I-
v
y >
QUJ C -O
U Ql
v
C r
C
r^
U QJ O
N
O to
4J
U i C
O 7D p
N C U
1 O ra
ra
.tn ra
C
L C
rLo
-O to to
J L!1
-p
L C
L
O
QJ Ln
V)
QJ to
"D
Ql O -LJ
_0U _0J
L ra
CO
L U C
u LL.
V1
>U
L Q)
L ro O
Ql V1
QI Lo
O v
L
ra Q
V �
L 1
ro O
C v u
ro
>
E -Eau
°J
c
v
v
Ln tai
toil O Q) QJ
Ln p 01 a) L L 7D
Q) Q c> 0 0=
Qat p tvn p E -o
ro a)to ro N C
j N ro L LO Q) ro Q)
to a u
L
N 3 L v ro d rroo v
ro L Q) -p u a to L
(1) a Ln (IJ L Z ro
L >t C- i C
> ra — a V, p N to
u
aO ro > > >L o,O
ro-0 m E— E s Q ro c o
Q1 O E r O O" N C C uL
O u 0 c .0 ru L L U O U
O06 - to C u> C i QJ �• C
LL -
Ln C y L JL/ ro 01 to to
M > O � L to QJ C O1 �
CFu
L ,C 0 0 c) E O •� ra
ra
G) Q) C Qaj v u C a O"ef C N ro cz L
O �--) o s Ln a L E ro ro ro L
vloEro�>f aEa,vGm)
LA
0 to
V
� QJ tL L C
Q) C >, L O O 'O
r0 C —Cu QJ Q) to Q_
to ,-j > to L41 C O
C Z) O ro ru
L QJ C V L O
-Lo U O C E to C QJ rp L >j
C c> m x -o ra E O
L C) ro
OU tri V) OL ro - ro "O c O
n O a :)❑ f` u
O a
U� O a OLO C
L o o ra c >' c' a o i°
� O C ° a ro J -j J_j
1if J O •> `O X ro U
•- LL > O -C
C ro O ro O p ro '- -p
rp O O>p to v U a C N
v O Q aJ Q ra L
O 0-0 LL- V a L p L
0 >, � ro C v ro ra L ` p _O
�C OS Oo E� �
LJ
N3cu
�
N O w 00 Cro N
m>? O O p 0) v Lo rYa O
O -p m 3-0--0 ra LL O N
a
L
U�oa�•cc•vc
v _
ro v 0
V
N-0 r°
O
J
�
>
L,u�
c) m
o
ros
C:
o C d I-
v
s
c J N
aN 0
N 'E
o c O rcns
v
c
° NL ro
rCa - v
ro
V) E�
p
C
r�LJ =m
•N
C
E�
QJ
�;
QJ L �L
N C U
1 O ra
ra
.tn ra
C
L
V C L
U v o o
v ro
-O
a Ql Ol •E
O a
o C o
N
Q1
X C rraa
0 0_
x0 ra
M
ra C
O O
N O d
`
C
O dJ
a
s t
L�
Q)
to L (-- -7j ro
L
a
0- 7D
un
lL L (�U'l Q)
o
Z
C -O
O L
L
L Q) F
a
C)->�
O
O O L-�
ra ra u C
N L >
C U rLo u
>
O
m
> >, •U -� L
> ra L
QLJ
LrldJ
r0 C
E Q, u s
L
L
L
to to C ro
.0
Q7 >, ro
ro QJ L
Q1
r0
C L E L
L ra E .? O
Q) J
. -
&A
LL- D_ O
lL
Nru
.' U .L
Q
-0
rp L. tri L,
L
L (a L
> to
L
L
(a
L Q- .- -O Q) L/)
p >
ca
L
V
L2
E O
Q1 O
C
C a' C
V yJ
ra ro v
a
a O ro L T
V L
M
Ql C QJ
L• L U
O ra
Q)
L u
'� LL .- O
O U
Q)
ra
O
a In .N Ln N it
O
.0 .=�
a
V1
ro X C
Q
l>-, L to
O
E
U.
L—
L
w rLa Q a) ro
O
Q) � ro u
Q)
Q ra
E
L
V
v •L Q)
Ln
vi r, L o o
ru
0
O Q- U L -O
D a L L
O ,n L
O
C U U
3: ra C d
O N O
i C Q1 J o ra
-p
O n
CL
O
ro
C>
C •tn
ra 01 Q) N L
ti
O O C
U L
L r0 QJ
U
ra
C C Z
O
D
O
ra c C O
U C C QJ ro
N]
rD
p ro C
L a-0
LL
O
L> ro M N N
w
H
�> —ru - E E a>
Q�j ro i
.0
C crl C O
N C v
p
L0 OL C Q1 C
V'
>
LU -
OLo>
O> v
Ln
Q
0 - o-
O
ro
OO
0 Ln
rC Q OO
a Cro ON
Of
Od Qv0
J
� O
CO
Q CV
From: John Zarate
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 7:52 AM
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Subject: Salinas River RV Storage vs Beaver Habitat
Haku and greetings,
I am writing on behalf of our cousins, the Beavers (and other residents), who live and own the land upon which you're
wanting to build storage units for 267 RVs.
This plan for storage units is not acceptable for destroying habitat which serves so much wildlife and, as a habitat for so
much life, provides balance to our lands.
Human conveniences will never outweigh the needs of our cousins' nations: The Beavers (and others) are our relatives
and without respecting their minimal needs of clean, open land, we will bring ruin upon our own.
All in the name of building storage facilities?
No
Not acceptable.
This Chumash stands against this building plan: Do not proceed.
Thank you,
John Khus
The Northern Chumash Bear Clan and
The Coastal Band of the Chumash Nation
ATTENTION:
This email originated from outside the City's network. Use caution when opening links and attachments.
E
JUN 2 0 7073
Li E-21-oI'D I
1
Comments previously
submitted from 11-15-22's
Planning Commission Meeting
From: Fred Frank
Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 3:24 PM
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Subject: Item #2: Proposed RV storage adjacent to Salinas river Comments
Dear Mr. Dunsmore,
I recently saw a small posting by the City about a proposal to allow a RV storage on Atascadero Mutual Water Company
property near the Salinas river. I strongly oppose this idea for the following reasons:
1) Storing vehicles near the river on highly permeable soil risks ground water contamination from oil and fuel
leakage. It is likely that many of the stored vehicles will be old and poorly maintained. Regular inspection for
leakage would be difficult and expensive.
2) A lot full of RVs of various sizes, colors and states of repair would be less than aesthetically pleasing regardless
of efforts toward screening.
3) Currently this property is used by many people for walking, bird watching, model airplane and miniature vehicle
racing, as well as, dog walking, horse riding, etc. Others like myself, just enjoy the view of our verdant river and
an unobstructed view of Pine mountain.
4) Maintenance of this storage operation would be demanding and costly since vegetation will grow under and
around the stored vehicles. The use of persistent herbicides near the river is problematic and would likely be
opposed by many people.
5) While the city and the water company may share some revenue from this venture. I can see many problems
associated with shared management of this operation.
6) Security would be difficult. Effective fencing on this sandy soil is difficult since it is nearly impossible to prevent
tunneling beneath in hidden areas. Cameras are likely to be vandalized.
7) Storing RVs could present a fire hazard that would be difficult to deal with if a fire were to occur.
8) Transients may attempt to occupy these RVs and this could lead greater issues and a policing problem in our
community.
The open space currently provided by this property demands little from the City but is a remarkably valuable asset to an
untold number of its citizens.
Please deny this proposal.
Thank You,
Fred Frank
t.g
NOV 9 2022
ATTENTION:
This email originated from outside the City's network. Use caution when opening links and attachments.
From: Gina Planeta
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 9:24 PM
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Subject: Agenda Item #2 - Conditional Use Permit at 6805 Sycamore Rd
Dear Planning Commission,
I would like to ask that the commission consider making these plans known to the general public before making their
decision. This area that is up for possible development is used by many in the community who I think would miss it
greatly.
I drive this route four times most days to take my daughter to school. On almost every pass I see people. Sometimes it's
people walking their dogs. Sometimes it's families walking. Often it's a group of folks who get together to fly their RC
planes. The area is used daily. Re-routing a historic trail and taking away riverfront open space for RV storage seems
like a very poor trade for the community.
It's one of the few spots in town where the river can be easily accessed and easily viewed from the road. It's a tiny bit of
scenic space in town. To drive that route daily and see just a wall of fencing and RV's would be a great
disappointment.
In addition, I don't believe Curbaril and Sycamore are well maintained enough to handle 200+ Rv's coming in and out
from their travels. Many of these RV's would have to come from the Curbaril side because of the trestle on
Capistrano. The trestle has a clearance of 13' 2", while fifth -wheel trailers are routinely 13' tall. That narrow margin is
nail-biting at best for the driver. With the tight, blind turn and no shoulders, RVs and trailers will avoid this route. In the
most recent rain the city had to put out a flooded sign on the roadway before the proposed site. In addition there are a
significant number of people who use the area between the end of Curbaril and the industrial part to exercise. Most
days I pass two older gentlemen walking, an older couple who use it as their bike route, and today I saw a gentleman
taking his ponies for a walk.
I truly don't believe this is the best use of that space and I think many of the residents of Atascadero would feel the
same way if they knew what was going on. Especially those of us living in this area of town.
Thank you so much for your time and consideration,
Gina and Briano Planeta
ATTENTION:
This email originated from outside the City's network. Use caution when opening links and attachments.
Nov 1 4 2022
(k Sr, 21-010
COMPn11NITY DEVELOPMENT
From:
Cindee Yandow
Sent:
Monday, November 14, 2022 9:25 PM
To:
Planning Commission Public Comments
Subject:
2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AT 6805 SYCAMORE ROAD
To whom it may concern,
I am writing this email to say I am not in favor of the proposed business at 6805 Sycamore Road for RV
Storage. I am the last house on Curbaril Ave, with the riverbed across the street. I drive this road 2xs a day
sometimes up to 6. This would be very sad and ugly site to see.
There are many reasons this is a bad idea. We shouldn't be ruining a historical trail. It should be left for
everyone to enjoy and walk, run, bike, fly remote control airplanes, ect. There is a homeless problem already
in the riverbed this will only attract them more which will cause break-ins, even if the area is "secure". I work
in the storage industry for Self Storage Management of California, we manage over 50 storage facilities in
California with one here in Atascadero (U Store -It Mini Storage). RVs are a huge problem and get broken into
often and people try to sneak and live in them. We have very few sites that we allow vehicle storage and that
ones we do have onsite residences where we have a live in manager. There were issues at Mike Deans Auto
Repair where they use to have RV storage (with —50 RVs) with homeless and breaks ins at 4990 Traffic Way,
Atascadero, CA 93422 and that was located on a main road. If they want to open a business like this it should be
somewhere else, not here.
Thank you, concerned tax payer, home owner, business owner of Atascadero.
Cindee Yandow
Yandow Realty Group
ATTENTION:
This email originated from outside the City's network. Use caution when opening links and attachments.
NOV 1 4 2022
me a`- Owl
From: Lori Toft
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 11:01 PM
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Subject: Agenda item #2
The San Batista de Anza trail does not BELONG to Atascadero... it's part of Californias history! That our city
administration thinks it can just move the historic trail in order to store 262 RVs? I can't believe anyone thinks this is ok!
We should be ashamed! And what a horrible eyesore that facility would be! As a lifelong city resident I am very much
opposed to this proposal and hope the planners can make a decision that honors our people, town and history!
Thank you.
Lori Toft
ATTENTION:
This email originated from outside the City's network. Use caution when opening links and attachments.
!
NOV ] 4 2022
�Sr �1-alc�l
From: Cleis Slezak >
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 9:07 AM
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Subject: Meeting ID: 832 5023 8111 Resolution # 2022-071 AB 361
I strongly oppose the planned RV storage facility going in on/near the DeAnza trail in Atascadero.
There is no good reason for a commercial establishment going in next to a historic trail. Not only
would it be an eyesore but it sets a bad precedent for further development where there should be
none. Please vote NO on this proposal.
Thank you, Cleis Slezak (resident of the county in Atascadero for 42 years)
A ETT NTION:
This email originated from outside the City's network. Use caution when opening links and attachments.
k
i
NOV 15 2022 j�
From: Kate Montgomery
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 11:05 AM
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Subject: Agenda #2
To the Atascadero Planning Commission
Tuesday November 15, 2021
Concerning the proposed RV storage facility on AMWC property:
It's not illegal but it's a terrible, inappropriate idea to use the Salinas River corridor for vehicle storage. We could
be working to protect and celebrate this precious and unique landscape. Which many already do on a daily basis in
a creative variety of recreational uses.
The deAnza trail, in the National Park Service, celebrates this land, describing on the City's website the wildlife and
stating "AMWC and the City of Atascadero allow the public to use their properties that front on the Salinas
River. Allowable uses include horseback riding, hiking, and bicycling." and "It is AMWC's and the City's desire to
maintain these precious riparian corridors so we can all enjoy them for many years to come."
No amount of landscaping and fencing can make this project ok. Pollution
from the variety of toxic liquids associated with large vehicles just upstream is inevitable. All night lighting of any
kind is unacceptable in wildlife areas. 200 RV's will be an eyesore, especially in this natural area where we enjoy
and expect a view of native oaks and willows below Pine Mountain.
Has the National Park Service been consulted? Is there a way for local citizens to have our input to the NPS, which
oversees the deAnza Trail?
I have a question. Why was this sweet riverfront property ever designated industrial use in the first place? Who
benefits? There are big flat empty lots in town and along the freeway far from sensitive habitat, the river and the
mountain. These areas could be fenced and landscaped for RV parking.
Many of us were shocked to learn about this project just in the past few days. Hopefully the City will take the time
to review everyone's issues and decide not to allow this project. Hopefully more appropriate land use practices
will be established at next year's General Plan update.
Thank you for reading!
Kate MontRomery
ATTENTION:
This email originated from outside the City's network. Use caution when opening links and attachments.
NOV 15 2022
From: Ernest Houston
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 11:07 AM
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Subject: Public Comment: Regular Meeting 11.15.2022, Agenda Item #2
Attachments: CityofAtascaderoPlanningComm_2022.11.15.pdf
Please see attached document, public input from Northern Chumash Tribal Council, pertaining to agenda item #2,
regular meeting November 15, 2022.
Ernest R. Houston
Northern Chumash Tribal Council
Tribal Cultural Resource Monitor
ATTENTION:
This email originated from outside the City's network. Use caution when opening links and attachments.
NOV 15 2022
',�san"r,ir
} Northern Chumash Tribal Council
north ernchumash.org chumashsanctuary.org
City of Atascadero Planning Commission
City Hall Council Chambers
6500 Palma Avenue, 4' Floor
Atascadero, California 93422
Regular Meeting, Tuesday, November 15, 2022
Regarding: n Item #2.Conditional UsC Pgrmitat 6805 SycamoreRoa
CHUMASH HERITAGE
National Marine Sanctuary
The Northern Chumash Tribal Council (NCTC) is concerned that the project site area may present the
risk of accidental discovery of previously undiscovered cultural artifacts given its proximity to the Salinas
River and its riverbank, the high likelihood that pre -colonial native peoples resided in this vicinity, and the
relatively undisturbed condition of the site.
Therefore, the Northern Chumash Tribal Council requests:
1. An archaeological record search encompassing the project site and the '/Z mile area surrounding it,
2. A Phase 1 archaeological survey at the work site, and if needed, an Extended Phase 1 survey,
3. Review of complete information discovered or generated to include maps, grading plans, photography,
and reports,
4. On-site consultation with NCTC representatives,
4. If archaeological investigation indicates probability of the presence of cultural artifacts, NCTC will ask
that one of our tribal cultural resource monitors be present during soil disturbance/excavation work.
Respectfully submitted,
Ernest R. Houston
Cultural Resource Monitor
Northern Chumash Tribal Council
For
Violet Sage Walker
Tribal Chairwoman
Northern Chumash Tribal Council
ENVIRONMENTAL & LAND -LYSE CONSULTING
EDUCATIONAL SERVICES TEACHING NATURE, NATIVE CULTURES & FARMING
PO Box 6533, Los Osos, CA 93412 (805) 356-6149
From: Suzy Reynolds
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 11:28 AM
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Subject: Comment agenda # USE21-0107
November 15, 2022
Planning Commission
City of Atascadero
Good day,
My name is Doug Reynolds. My wife, Suzy, and I have been residents of Atascadero since 1980. We raised two
daughters who attended school in Atascadero. The oldest taught English at the high school for 16 years.
Suzy and I are avid walkers and one of our routes takes us along Sycamore on the De Anza trail. During COVID, we
noticed the trash accumulation along Sycamore. We needed something to keep us busy, so we decided to pick up trash
in this area. During the first few months, we gathered enough trash to ask permission of Russ from Classic Coach to use
his dumpster for the large bags. Currently, we pick up the litter as needed and are able to take advantage of the
"Orange Bag" program in Atascadero to dispose of these bags. We participate in regular river clean up with the local
"Beaver Brigade." As you can see, we are actively involved with our community.
We are concerned about the detrimental effect of the proposed facility in this area. The facility would dominate the
area from 6805 Sycamore to the 41 bridge, eliminating the view of the Salinas river and surrounding areas. A variety of
activities would be affected: hiking, biking, dog training, equestrians, and river exploration.
Walking would be diverted to the roadside (current speed limit is 40 mph) and separated with a split rail fence. This
scenario could be hazardous to anyone that close to the road. Many cars do not currently obey the posted speed limit.
We do not feel the economic benefit of this proposed business would offset the negative impact on the beauty of this
area. It will not bring new jobs and the tax benefit to the city would be minimal. We are not in favor of this project.
Respectfully,
Doug and Suzy Reynolds
E(',3' El
NOV 15 2022
use Zt-0101
1-'11 4Wbt=-:cVi lVtA tIt I
ATTENTION:
This email originated from outside the City's network. Use caution when opening links and attachments.
From: Dug Chisholm
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 12:13 PM
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Subject: 11/15/22 meeting: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AT 6805 SYCAMORE ROAD
To the Planning Commission: u�;E'a.l _ 0101
NOV 15 2022
We have been Atascadero residents since 1976, and we have both
been outdoor enthusiasts, though we are getting older and are
somewhat less active than in years past.
I practiced psychiatry from 1977 to 2020, and I have been very
active in the Atascadero Land Preservation Society (ALPS),
including helping to spearhead the purchase and upgrade the land
at the lower entrance to Stadium Park and writing the grant that
secured the bulk of funding for the Three Bridges Oak Preserve.
My spouse, Mary Alice, has been a nurse during most of those
years, including a stint as the school nurse for AUSD. She is
currently very active in the ALF Food Pantry (formerly Atascadero
Loaves and Fishes).
The De Anza trail is one of the hiking opportunities in Atascadero
that we have enjoyed. It was brought to our attention that an RV
storage facility is planned for 6805 Sycamore. We understand that
the zoning can accommodate such use, but we would encourage
the Commission to review carefully the potential benefits and
detriments that might result. The project would not create any
additional jobs, but it would perhaps generate a small amount of tax
revenue for the City. It would definitely change the visual
experience for people hiking (or driving) on Sycamore. It could
affect the safety of hikers walking along Sycamore.
If the Planning Commission is going to approve this use, we
strongly encourage requiring adequate setback from the street with
adequate safe space for a sidewalk or trail. Also, there is a
planned 6 foot fence, and the RV's will be much taller than that, so
we would also encourage some stringent requirements for
landscaping, such as a tall and thick screen of greenery.
We apologize for this late submission, but we just learned of this
proposed use today.
Dugald and Mary Alice Chisholm
ATTENTION:
This email originated from outside the City's network. Use caution when opening links and attachments.
2
From: Mike
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 12:27 PM
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Subject: Sycamore RV Storage - PC Meeting 11/15/2022
NOV 15 2022 i
(A- �F—
Planning Commissioners and Atascadero Mutual Water Company (AMWC),
Please oppose the Sycamore RV Storage project.
We need more open space within the city limits, not less. We need less encroachment on the Salinas
River basin, not more.
This area has historically been used by many people as an outdoor space to enjoy and use. We
greatly appreciate AMWC for allowing this use.
I am now saddened and dismayed to see the AMWC has changed their mind and decided go forward
with this project on their property located within the river basin. How and when did the AMWC
decide to proceed with this project? Looking through their meeting minutes for the last 15 months, I
see no discussion about this project, therefore no indication to the shareholders that this project was
under consideration. If revenue is the driving force for the project, I believe the shareholders would
rather have an increase in their water rates.
While the city and AMWC may share some revenue from this venture, I believe the project is short
sided and once in place the land will forever be damaged.
Other reasons I don't endorse this project:
- The Salinas River is a critical habitat and pathway for many animals. It is also a riparian area that
needs to be protected and helped, not encroached upon.
- Storing up to 262 large vehicles near the river on permeable soil seems like it would risk ground
water contamination from oil and fuel leakage. Regular inspection for leakage will be required and
any leakage would need to have the soil removed and remediated.
1. — This storage lot will be less than aesthetically pleasing regardless of efforts toward screening.
2. - Vegetation maintenance will be required as vegetation will grow under and around the stored
vehicles. The use of herbicides near the river is problematic.
- Security will be difficult regardless of fencing. Transients will attempt to occupy these RVs. Cameras
and lighting will be required.
3.
From the City website Trails handbook:
Atascadero is located in the heart of the Central Coast, offering a blend of natural beauty and rural
lifestyle. Its comfortable climate and atmosphere are influenced by the beautiful Pacific Ocean on the
West, and also by the Salinas River and open countryside to the East. Local scenery includes oak -
studded hills, creeks, and scenic vistas of the Santa Lucia Mountains. Atascadero has a rich history,
with many recreational opportunities to fit your individual style. This trail guide booklet will give you
the inside scoop into some of the best trails that the City of Atascadero has to offer. Enjoy!
Anza Trail: This historic trail passes through Atascadero in close proximity to the Salinas River. The
Atascadero Mutual Water Company and the City of Atascadero opened segments of the trail for
public use. The trail is lined with beautiful oaks and other native vegetation. Trail markers are
extremely easy to find and lead you easily along all the trails. This trail consists of abundant wildlife
and native vegetation that makes this hike one of a kind. Enjoy the easy trail in the morning or at
night for a unique experience.
Thank you for your consideration,
Mike Orvis
ATTENTION: i
This email originated from outside the City's network. Use caution when opening links and attachments. }
From: Dorsey Johnston
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 3:21 PM
To: Planning Commission Public Comments
Cc: Zoe Corral
Subject: Agenda Item #2. 11/15/22 proposed RV Storage
City of Atascadero,
My name is Dorsey Hogue -Johnston and I represent Mason Family Trust along with being one
of the owners of the
property located at 6905 - 6915 Sycamore Road, located to the south of this proposed
project.
We are opposed to the project for the following reasons.
1. Environmentally there are many hazards due to storage of these vehicles that will leak oils
and fuels into our city water system.
2. This project will attract and encourage more trash and traffic from the homeless. Providing
them with many hiding places to set up camp. I see security being an issue.
3. This project will be directly against the back of our buildings and increasing the problems that
already occur in this area. Theft, vandalism, and vagrants wandering thru our businesses
are a common issue at the Sycamore Industrial Park. in the past we have had gas
stolen, mental health issues with the homeless wandering around and water stolen.
4. The area of the proposed project is an area that is used daily by many of our city residents
who walk their dogs, get out for daily exercise and fresh air. You also have the community of
RC pilots who are down there using that area on a regular basis.
5. The increased traffic this project will generate on Curbaril Road, and Sycamore Roads will be
a problem. These roads are not maintained, designed, or set up to handle 200+ RV's coming
and going from this area.
6. There is always the enhanced fire potential due to all the combustible materials being in such
a tight confined area. The chance for a fire getting out of control and damaging our property is
enhanced with this project.
We strongly oppose this project.
Please vote NO.
Thank you for your time,
Sincerely,
Dorsey Hogue -Johnston
Co-owner
Mason Family 1993 Trust
NOV 15 2022
t: S a 1 - 010 -
CCMMIiNiTY LiEVELGFMENT
From: Karen Gleason
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 7:47 AM
To: City Clerk <cityclerk@atascadero.org>
Subject: 6805 Sycamore Road, open space, D' Anza trail.
I strongly disagree with making this now open space area a parking lot for RV's. This area is used by so
many different people., dog walkers, horse back riders, joggers, hobby plane and cars. I feel this would
further destroy the historic D' Anza trail by introducing more motorized vehicles, motorcycles in
particular which is already a problem in the Salinas River area. If the trail is rerouted then it will surely be
destroyed by motorcycles. This area should be kept open for the public to use and not become an
unsightly parking lot for RV's. As an Atascadero Horsemen member, we use this part of the river for trail
riding and already have a hard time sharing this space with motorcycles. Motorcycles have access to the
river in so many different areas, that it is impossible to keep them out and if we diminish the open space
then it becomes a much more hazardous area for motorcycles and equestrians side by side. Let's keep
this space open for public access and try to keep motorized vehicles off the D' Anza trail. Thank you,
Karen Gleason, Salinas River open space enthusiast.
NOV 15 2022
USEZl—C�in -i
Annette Manier
From: Annette Manier
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2022 8:52 AM
To: jandkspantry@gmail.com
Subject: Email comments re: 6805 Sycamore
Hi Karen Gleason,
Your email comments were directed to the City Clerk's email, instead of the Planning Commission email box (which is
comments@atascadero.org).
Your comments were forwarded late yesterday to the Commission prior to the meeting, so they did read them.
I will be posting these online today. The meeting was continued to a future Planning Commission meeting, date
uncertain.
Thank you,
Annette Manier, Administrative Assistant
CITY OF ATASCADERO
Community Development Dept.
6500 Palma Ave., Atascadero CA 93422
Direct (805) 470-3402 1 Office (805) 461-5035
Direct Fax: (805) 470-3403 1 Office Fax (805) 461-7612
www.atascadero.or
Dedicated to Atascadero's character and safety by helping people plan and build quality projects
City Hall is open to the public by appointment only. Lobby hours are 9 a.m. —12 p.m., and 1 p.m. — 4 p.m. We
are closed for lunch between 12-1.
-----Original Message -----
From: Wendy Ogle
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 8:52 AM
To: City Clerk <citvclerk@atascadero.or>
Subject: Conditional Use Permit at 6805 Sycamore Road
To whom it may concern:
I am a resident here in Atascadero and very upset about this, I think it should be denied. I am
disabled and it's hard to find places for walking that feels like your in nature, if they do this I will no
longer be able to go on my walks with nature. We already have plenty storage facilities in town, why are
they trying to ruin our riverbed views!?! I wish you could experience the pain I go thru just to have a
natural walk in nature and they want to ruin it, please don't pass this. Has there even been any studies
of what it may do to our riverbed, why lose our nature to this? Our town is already growing too fast
don't make us (your crippled) lose one of our last natural places to walk with nature. I can't walk up our
great hills but I love walking the riverbeds and edges. The ADA should be involved with any kind of
development along the riverbed and I haven't heard or seen anything about them involved on this. Do
our council members even think about what this will do to your constituents with disabilities? Take time
and think, don't pass this I want to continue my walks in nature!!!
Wendy Ogle
NOV 15 2022
uSE 21- 010'1
OEVFLOPMENT
Annette Manier
From: Annette Manier
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2022 8:44 AM
To: atarisophia@gmail.com
Subject: Public Comment re: 6805 Sycamore
Hi Wendy,
Your email comments were directed to the City Clerk's email, instead of the Planning Commission email box (which is
comments@atascadero.or).
Your comments were forwarded late yesterday to the Commission prior to the meeting, so they did read them.
I will be posting these online today. The meeting was continued to a future Planning Commission meeting, date
uncertain.
Thank you,
Annette Manier, Administrative Assistant
CITY OF ATASCADERO
Community Development Dept.
6500 Palma Ave., Atascadero CA 93422
Direct (805) 470-3402 1 Office (805) 461-5035
Direct Fax: (805) 470-3403 I Office Fax (805) 461-7612
www.atascadero.orL
Dedicated to Atascadero's character and safety by helping people plan and build quality projects
City Hall is open to the public by appointment only. Lobby hours are 9 a.m. —12 p.m., and 1 p.m. — 4 p.m. We
are closed for lunch between 12-1.
WATER COMPANY COMMENTS
USE z I oio-7
ITEM 3
RV Storage at 6805 Sycamore Rd.
USE 21-0107 /VSM Leasing & Rentals LLC
Atascadero Design Review Committee
Staff Report - Community Development Department
RV Storage, 6805 Sycamore Road
MEETING
DATE
PROJECT PLANNER
APPLICANT CONTACT
PLN NO.
7/28/22
Mariah Gasch
VSM Leasing & Rentals
USE 21-0107
Associate Planner
LLC
RECOMMENDATION
Staff Recommends to the DRC:
Review Plans for a new business that includes outdoor Recreational Vehicle (RV) storage
and direct the applicant to make any modifications to the site as necessary prior to
proceeding to the Planning Commission for a review of a Conditional Use Permit.
PROJECT
GENERAL PLAN
ZONING
ASSESOR
PARCEL
SITE
ADDRESS
DESIGNATION
DISTRICT
NUMBER Sy
AREA
6805 Sycamore Road Industrial (1)/ Industrial 028-121-001 23.24 -acre site
Open Space Park (IP)/ 6 -acre lease area
(OS) Open
Space (OS)
/PD 31
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project includes a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a 6 -acre outdoor recreational
vehicle (RV) storage yard in the Industrial zone. The site is proposed to be used for the storage
of up to 262 RVs on a portion of the site that is currently owned by Atascadero Mutual Water
Company in the Industrial zone.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The City of Atascadero's environmental review process incorporates the requirements in implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act. Persons, agencies, or organizations interested in obtaining more
information regarding the environmental should contact the Community Development Department.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED BY CONTACTING THE ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AT
hftR://www.ataseadero.org
RV Storage 6805 Sycamore Rd.
USE 21-0107 / VSM Leasing and Rentals LLC
Aerial Map
Abe(705
Area of storage use:
w xy .47
471
u5 „i,A3kftt51
Not a Part �z
DISCUSSION:
Project Description
The proposed project includes a six -acre outdoor recreational vehicle (RV) storage yard in the
Industrial zone. The site is proposed to be used for the storage of up to 262 vehicles outdoors.
Outdoor vehicle storage in excess of 10,000 square feet is subject to the review and approval of
a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. In order to approve the use, the
Commission must make a series of use permit findings. If approved, the project is also subject to
conditions of approval.
Background
The subject site is located on the north side of Sycamore Avenue, adjacent to the Salinas River.
The site is owned by Atascadero Mutual Water Company (AMWC) and contains an existing
fenced construction yard with storage buildings. In 2007, the City Council adopted a zone text
change to establish a new site-specific Planned Development #31 Overlay Zone with a
corresponding Master Plan of Development. The intent of the zone text change was to allow for
a private bicycle motocross (BMX) facility to locate on the property. The BMX facility was never
constructed and aside from the existing construction yard, the site has remained vacant. The
planned development states that all other uses listed as allowed or conditionally allowed are
subject to the requirements of the Zoning Code.
Design Review Committee I City of Atascadero I www.atascadero.org I fb.me/planningatascadero
understand the reasoning why they want this but
its could invite more encampments being the ITEM 3
eller vegetation provides shade and coverage for V Storage 6805 Sycamore Rd.
9h encampments. VSM Leasing and Rentals LLC
Landsca .
The applicant provided a landscaiJ plan proposing new landscaping along the realigned
De Anza Trail and Sy more Road. Staff is recommending a revision to the landscaping
plan to focus taller getation along the interior fence adjacent to the RV storage lot. This
recommendation also includes adding shorter species between the De Anza Trail and
Sycamore Road to avoid the trail from becoming a hidden corridor. The applicant's
landscape plan did not include landscaping between the existing construction yard onsite
and Sycamore Road. Staff is requesting that the landscape plan be extended to include
this portion since it is a part of the subject's parcel. This landscaping should be consistent
with what is proposed on the opposite side of the driveway. There are six Coast Live Oak
trees that will remain onsite and be protected during construction. Minimal landscaping is
proposed throughout the RV parking areas. Atascadero Municipal Code (AMC) 9.4-125
requires 5% of the lot in an Industrial zone to be landscaped. The applicant has not
provided overall lot coverage of landscaping so this will be verified prior to the Planning
Commission hearing. If the proposed landscape plan does not meet the 5% requirement,
staff will support an exception due to the industrial nature of the use.
Fencing, lighting and security I understand they
There is an existing six -foot -tall chain link fence along the a want to try and and
around the current construction yard. This chain link fencE beautify the area of
Sycamore Road. There is also an existing chain link fence aloi but it is still an p to
the existing parking area for the trail. Staff is recommending that Industrial area and tin
a hidden corridor, the applicant replace the existing chain link f the wooden rail will
fence of either metal or wood. The applicant is proposing ne be a maintenance ated
chain link fencing around the RV storage lot. AMC 9-4.128 reqi problem. If the City ted
chain link fencing to be screened with evergreen vegetation. Tt is going to maintain it to
the De Anza Trail will be heavily screened with landscaping then it is a different cing
around the rear of the site does not have landscape screening. I story. g an
exception to this standard due to the industrial nature of the site and its use. The rear
property line abuts a tall berm along the Salinas River and the applicant is proposing an
infiltration bio swale along the entire fence line. Adding landscaping to this side would
extend into proposed RV spaces, potentially creating the need for a site redesign and
reducing the number of parking spaces onsite. The applicant is proposing a powered gate
that will be keypad controlled. There will be no regular onsite workers. Therefore, the RV
storage will be self-service.
The submittal shows several new light poles throughout the site with a maximum height
of 20 feet tall. Staff is recommending this maximum height be reduced 16 feet for each
light pole. This will reduce the light spilling onto adjacent parcels. The applicant is
proposing lights that dim low levels light until motion is detected. This will reduce negative
impact on the surrounding area while providing security for the business. They are also
proposing the installation of five new security cameras on five of the proposed lights poles.
The applicant has a pre-existing contract with a local security company. They plan to
continue using them for this site for 24-hour security coverage.
Design Review Committee I City of Atascadero I www.atascadero.org I fb.melplanningatascadero
ITEM 3
RV Storage 6805 Sycamore Rd.
USE 21-01071VSM Leasing and Rentals LLC
Storage Yard Conditions
The Industrial zone is the appropriate location for intensive uses such as outdoor storage
yards. However, such land uses can be detrimental to the City if not properly designed
and adequately maintained. If approved, the use permit to allow a storage yard will run
with the land, regardless of the business owner/operator. The accumulation of storage
containers, illegal businesses, transient camps, inoperable vehicles, feral animals, and
the storage of miscellaneous junk and debris are possible negative impacts brought about
by this land use. Conditions of approval and an annual site review are very important to
prevent this property from falling into a deteriorated site. Staff is considering the following
conditions be added for the Planning Commission review of the use permit:
1. All landscaping, fencing and site improvements shall be maintained in good order.
Any dead or non-performing landscape items shall be replaced within 30 days. Any
damaged fencing, lighting, or site improvements shall be replaced immediately.
2. No changes to fencing, landscaping, or site improvements may be installed without
prior approval by the City.
3. No cargo containers, inoperable vehicles, inoperable boats or inoperable RV's
shall be stored on-site. Only currently registered, operable vehicles or RV's may
be stored on-site.
4. No storage of vehicles in any location other than in the designated on-site parking
areas as identified in the site plan approved by Planning Commission may be
stored on any portion of the site.
5. No other land use shall be allowed in conjunction with the RV storage unless
specifically approved by the City.
6. No washing of vehicles, RV's or Boats or other equipment may occur on-site.
This should be per dumping of RV waste or water tanks may occur on site at any time.
permit conditions r storage, paving, stockpiling, grading, or use of the site shall be allowed within
not a subjective D feet of the top of the bank of Atascadero Creek. —I -- -- - - -- - - -,
review by anie realignment of the De Anza Trail shall be consistent with what is proposed.
individual. ie trail shall be completed and fully landscaped to the satisfaction of the
Lammunity Development Director prior to building permit final.
10. The existing chain link fence adjacent to Sycamore Road and the realigned De
Anza Trail shall be replaced with a split rail fence with a maximum height of 4 feet
tall.
1. Taller vegetation shall be focused between the RV storage lot and the realigned
De Anza Trail.
Inderstand the , All new fencing chain link fencing shall be vinyl coated with a dark neutral color.
asoning why they The maximum fence height shall not exceed 6 feet.
ant this but this 3. Maximum height of new light poles shall not be taller than 16 feet for each light
)uld invite more pole. The lights shall be set to dim low level light until motion is detected.
The Use Permit shall be subject to additional review upon receipt of operational
Icampments complaints. Additional mitigation may be warranted upon verification of recurring
!ing the taller
!getation provides noise or operational disturbances that impact residential properties.
jade and
)verage for teh
Icamaments.
Design Review Committee I City of Atascadero I www.atascadero.org I fb.melplanningatascadero
ITEM 3
RV Storage 6805 Sycamore Rd.
USE 21-0107 1 VSM Leasing and Rentals LLC
Analysis
The land use proposed, Outdoor Vehicle and Equipment Storage is a conditionally
allowed use in the Industrial Zoning district. Section 9-6.140 of the City's Zoning
Regulations provides a set of site design standards for storage yards in addition to the
provisions of the use permit (Attachment 4).
The applicant is proposing to complete the project in two phases. The first phase consists
of 138 RV spaces, a new perimeter fence along the Phase 1 area, site grading with Class
II base finish (in Phase 1 areas only), construction of an entrance gate and completion of
the required stormwater basin. Phase 2 includes the addition of 124 parking spaces,
removal of the dividing fence between the two phases and extension of the new vinyl
coated chain link fence adjacent to the Salinas River.
The De Anza Trail currently traverses through this property and culminates from a small
parking lot along Sycamore Road. Due to this development, the trail will need to be
realigned along Sycamore Road. Staff is also adding a condition that the realignment of
the De Anza Trail, and the improvements to fencing and landscaping, be completed with
Phase 1.
Pror)osed Site Plan
�`
Design Review Committee I City of Atascadero I www.atascadero.org I fb.me/planningatascadero
ITEM 3
RV Storage 6805 Sycamore Rd.
USE 21-0107 / VSM Leasing and Rentals LLC
DRC Discussion items:
1. Landscaping
2. Fencing, lighting and security
3. Proposed project conditions
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1: Site Plan
Attachment 2: Landscape Plan
Attachment 3: Site Photos
Attachment 4: AMC 9-6.140
Attachment 5: DRC Notice of Action
Design Review Committee I City of Atascadero I www.atascadero.org I fb.melplanningatascadero
¢
F
Z
W
0 -
LU
0
z
w
Q.
Q.
O
J
W
W
}
H
Z
g
O
U
O
x
w
0
U)
0
wW ca
U
cn
H �
Z
1¢— .
Z
O
U
}
m
w
z
a
m
O
w
m
}
z
0
a
0
LL
Z
N
w
L
d
E
s
v
Q
.v
4
i
O
111
Z
Q
F—
m
O
W
m
a
z
O
Q
O
LL
z
z
O
H
0
D
Q
Q
E—
�$
Z
a LL
,( 1
_
Q W
4e�{
$
.v
4
i
O
111
Z
Q
F—
m
O
W
m
a
z
O
Q
O
LL
z
z
O
H
0
D
Q
N
W
N
AS
ITEM 3
RV Storage at 6805 Sycamore Rd.
USE 21-0107 / VSM Leasing $ Rentals LLC
Attachment 3: Site Photos
USE 21-0107
Existinq Site (Facing Northwest)
Existing Site (Facing Northeast)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED BY CONTACTING THE ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AT
http://www.atascadero.org
ITEM 3
RV Storage 6805 Sycamore Rd.
USE 21-01071 VSM Leasing and Rentals LLC
View of the site from Sycamore Road
Existinq construction yard
Design Review Committee I City of Atascadero I www.atascadero.org I fb.melplanningatascadero
ITEM 3
RV Storage at 6805 Sycamore Rd.
USE 21-0107 / VSM Leasing & Rentals LLC
De Anza Trail Entrance
*-41
Location of new automated nate
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED BY CONTACTING THE ATASCADERO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AT
hftr)://www.atascadero.or
ITEM 3
RV Storage 6805 Sycamore Rd.
USE 21-0107 / VSM Leasing and Rentals LLC
Attachment 4: AMC 9-6.140
USE 21-0107
4-6.140 Storage yards.
Outdoor storage yards. excluding the storage of vehicles in a dap use parking lot or garage, are subiect to the provisions of thus section. l he storage of vehicles in a public
or commercial parking lot or garage is subject to Section 94.114; the storage ol'wrecked. abandoned or vehicles being disrrtantled. is subject to Section 9.6-131. in addition to
this section.
(a) Site Design Standards -
11) Acccss. Thcre shall be only one I I i access point to a storage yard for tech three hundred. 1300) t'eet of street frontage. Such access point is to be a maximum width of
twenty (20) Leet and shall be provided with a solid gate or door.
42) Screening. A storage yard, except a temporary offsite construction yard, is to be screened from public view on all sides by solid wood, painted metal or nvtsomy
feortcing with a minimum height of six (6) Leet Alt required screening shalt be ewttinuously ntaintaino d in good vonditton to assure that its intended purpposc is accomph shed.
This requirement may be waived through administrative use permit 4 vroval (Section 9.1.112), when:
ti) The side of a storage yard abuts a railroad right-of-way. or
iii) Me surrounding terrain, existing vegetation intended to remain or other conditions would make fencing ineffective or unnecessary for the purpose of screening the
storage yard from the view of publie roads.
(3) Parking Requirement. None, provided that sufficient usable area is available to accommodate all employer: and user parking needs entirely on-site.
(4) Site Surfacing. A storage yard shall be surfaeLd with concrete. asphalt paving. crushed rock, or ailad earth. and be maintamed in a dust-fice condition.
(5) Office }acilities. When no buildings exist or are proposed on a storage yard site. one 41) commercial couch may be utilized for an office. provided that such vehicle is
equippeoi with skirting, and installed pursuant to the permit requimmernas of'litle k of this; Code ( the Building and Construction Ordinance)
(b) taperation bxeepi for vchiek4 or freestanding equipment. materials within a storage yard are not to be stacked ur stored highcr titan six (6) feet. unless octet nhrg
requirements have been waived or modified pursuant to subsection 4a)(2)(ii) of this section, of unless a higher wall or fence is constructed at the required setback line under an
approved building permit. (Ord- 614 4 4, 2017. Ord. 552 § 2.2010; Ord. 68 § 9-6.140. 19H.1)
N\
Design Review Committee I City of Atascadero I www.atascadero.org I fb.melplanningatascadero
ITEM 3
RV Storage 6805 Sycamore Rd.
USE 21-0107 / VSM Leasing and Rentals LLC
Attachment 5: DRC Notice of Action
USE 21-0107
CITY OF ATASCADERO
_;
Community Development Department
6500 Palma Avenue I Atascadero, CA 93422 1 Phone: (805) 461-5035 1 www.atascadero.org
Project #: Use 21-0107
Project Title: RV Storage Lot
Planner/ Project Manager: Mariah Gasch
DRC Review Date(s): 7/28/22
Final Action: ❑ DRC
Refer to comments above.
Conditions & Recommendations:
1. All landscaping, fencing and site improvements shall be maintained in good order. Any dead or non-
performing landscape items shall be replaced within 30 days. Any damaged fencing, lighting, or site
improvements shall be replaced immediately.
2. No changes to fencing, landscaping, or site improvements may be installed without prior approval
by the City.
3. No cargo containers, inoperable vehicles, inoperable boats or inoperable RV's shall be stored on-
site. Only currently registered, operable vehicles or RV's may be stored on-site.
4. No storage of vehicles in any location other than in the designated on-site parking areas as identified
in the site plan approved by Planning Commission may be stored on any portion of the site.
5. No other land use shall be allowed in conjunction with the RV storage unless specifically approved
by the City.
6. No washing of vehicles, RV's or Boats or other equipment may occur on-site.
7. No dumping of RV waste or water tanks may occur on site at any time.
8. No storage, paving, stockpiling, grading, or use of the site shall be allowed within 30 feet of the top
of the bank of Atascadero Creek.
9. The realignment of the De Anza Trail shall be consistent with what is proposed. The trail shall be
completed and fully landscaped to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director prior to
building permit final.
10. The existing chain link fence adjacent to Sycamore Road and the realigned De Anza Trail shall be
replaced with a split rail fence with a maximum height of 4 feet tall.
11. Taller vegetation shall be focused between the RV storage lot and the realigned De Anza Trail.
12. All new fencing chain link fencing shall be vinyl coated with a dark neutral color. The maximum fence
height shall not exceed 6 feet.
13. Maximum height of new light poles shall not be taller than 16 feet for each light pole. The lights shall
be set to dim low level light until motion is detected.
14. The Use Permit shall be subject to additional review upon receipt of operational complaints.
Additional mitigation may be warranted upon verification of recurring noise or operational
disturbances that impact residential properties.
`*"�' Design Review Committee I City of Atascadero I www.atascadero.org I fb.me/planningatascadero