HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Resolution 21-0010PC RESOLUTION 2021-0010 t
CITY OF ATASCADERO
PLANNING
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AMENDMENT AMND21-0054, AN AMENDMENT TO
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 02-91 TO ALLOW FOR AN EXPANSION
OF UNITS FOR THE EMPIRE APARTMENTS ON APN 030-271-019
5880 ARDILLA ROAD
ARRIS STUDIO ARCHITECTS
WHEREAS, an application was received from Arris Studio Architects, 1327 Archer Street, Suite
220, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, Applicant, and San Luis Obispo Non-profit Housing Corporation, 478
Leff Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, Owner, to consider an Amendment to Conditional Use Permit
02-91 to allow an expansion to an existing multi -family development up to thirty-two units; and
and
WHEREAS, the site has a General Plan Designation of High Density Residential (HDR);
WHEREAS, the property is in the Residential Multi -Family (RMF -24) zoning district; and
WHEREAS, twenty-four (24) units per acre maximum density is allowed in High Density Multi-
family (RMF -24) zone and the 1.10 -acre site has a base density of up to twenty-seven (27) units; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65915 allows a density bonus of up to thirty-five percent
(35%) above what is allowed by the zoning code for designating at least twenty percent (20%) of the units
for low income; and
WHEREAS, the project includes one -hundred percent 100% low income restricted affordable
units; and
WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of
environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and
WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Major Conditional
Use Permit Amendment application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at
which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Conditional Use Permit; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed Conditional Use Permit application
on July 20, 2021, at 6:00 p.m. and considered testimony and reports from staff, the applicants, and the
public.
NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, California, takes the
following actions:
SECTION 1. CEQA. The Planning Commission finds as follows:
1. The proposed project is Categorically Exempt (Class 32) from the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA") and
CEQA Guidelines (Title 14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq.) CEQA pursuant to
CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, because it includes in -fill development.
SECTION 2. Findings for approval of Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission
finds as follows:
1. The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan; and
Fact: The use is consistent with the Residential Multi -Family designation of the General Plan and
General Plan Land Use Element Policy 1. 1, preserving the rural atmosphere, 1.1.7, infill within the
urban core, and Housing Element Policies 1.1, providing households for all income levels, 1.3,
encouraging the production of housing with an emphasis on affordable to the persons with
disabilities, and 2. 1, facilitating housing development that is affordable to lower income households
by providing concessions.
2. The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance; and
Fact: As proposed, the project will meet the property's setback, height and other site design
requirements. The use of the structure will be limited to uses permitted by the Zoning Ordinance.
The project, with Planning Commission approval of this Conditional Use Permit, satisfies all
applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance related to residential accessory structures.
The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because of the
circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or
welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be
detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use; and
Fact: The proposed residential development will not be detrimental to the general public or working
person's health, safety, or welfare.
4. The proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the character of the immediate
neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development; and
Fact: The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood by providing a higher
density residential development along Ardilla Ave. with topographic and landscape buffering to
adjacent single-family land uses. The project has been designed.to enhance the appearance of an
existing multi -family project with compatible architecture and project landscaping. The General
Plan identifies the project site as a prime multi -family site.
The proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe capacity of all
roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be improved in conjunction with the
project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the surrounding neighborhood that would result
from full development in accordance with the land use element; and
Fact: The proposed project and use is consistent with the traffic projections and road improvements
anticipated within the General Plan and as proposed by the applicant.
6. The proposed project is in compliance with any pertinent City policy or criteria adopted by
ordinance or resolution of the City Council; and
Fact: The proposed additional units are within the maximum density allowed for the high density
residential multifamily zoning district. The proposed amendment, with staff recommended
conditions, is compliant with all related zoning codes and plans.
Findiny_s for approval of a landscape_ exception. The Planning Commission finds as follows:
7. Existing vegetation topography or structural arrangement preclude the need for landscaping.
Fact: The site is developed with an existing building and parking lot. Adding additional landscaping
would reduce the number of parking spaces on an already constrained site. The applicant has
maximized the available area for landscaping.
SECTION 3. Approval. The Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session
assembled on July 20, 2021, resolved to approve Conditional Use Permit AMND21-0054, subject to the
following:
EXHIBIT A:
Conditions of Approval
EXHIBIT B:
Site Plan
EXHIBIT C:
Floor Plans
EXHIBIT D:
Elevation Drawings
EXHIBIT E:
Landscape Plan
On motion by Commissioner Anderson, and seconded by Commissioner Keen, the foregoing resolution is
hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Anderson, Carranza, Hughes, Keen, van den Eikhof (5 )
NOES: None (0 )
ABSENT: McIntyre, Schmidt (2 )
ABSTAINED: None (0 )
ADOPTED: July 20, 2021
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA
Jeff v n ikho
Planning Commission Chairperson
AT ST::
Phil Dunsmore
Planning Commission Secretary
EXHIBIT A: Conditions of Approval
AIVIND 21-0054
Conditions of Approval
Timing
AMND 21-0054
5880 Ardilla Ave.
BL: Business License
GP: Grading Permit
Addition to existing residential multi -family
BP: Building Permit
FI: Final Inspection
TO: Temporary Occupancy
FO: Final Occupancy
Planning Services Conditions
1. This Conditional Use Permit shall allow the accessory structure described in the
Ongoing
attached exhibits and located on APN 030-271-019.
2. The approval of this use permit shall become final and effective for the purposes of
Ongoing
issuing building permits fourteen (14) days following the Planning Commission
approval unless an appeal to the decision is filed as set forth in Section 9-1.111(b) of
the Zoning Ordinance.
3. The Community Development Department shall have the authority to approve the
BP
following minor changes to the project that (1) modify the site plan project by less
than 10%, (2) result in a superior site design or appearance, and/or (3) address a
construction design issue that is not substantive to the Master Plan of Development.
The Planning Commission shall have the final authority to approve any other changes
to the Master Plan of Development and any associated Tentative Maps unless
appealed to the City Council.
4. Approval of this Conditional Use Permit shall be valid for twenty-four (24) months
BP
after its effective date. At the end of the period, the approval shall expire and
become null and void unless the project has received a building permit and started
construction on the project.
5. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Atascadero or its
Ongoing
agents, officers, and employees against any claim or action brought to challenge an
approval by the City, or any of its entities, concerning the construction or use of the
detached accessory structure.
6. All exterior elevations, finish materials and colors shall be consistent with what is shown
BP / FI
in EXHIBIT D.
7. The applicant shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan concurrently with their
BP / FI
building permit submittal.
8. The developer and/or subsequent owner shall assume responsibility for the
Ongoing
continued maintenance of all landscape and common areas, consistent with
EXHIBIT D.
9. Trash receptacles are to be fully shielded from adjacent properties.
BPI Ongoing
10. The applicant shall submit a Parking Management Plan, to be approved by the
FI
Community Development Director, and record the plan prior to requesting a final
planning inspection.
11. The applicant shall add a new six foot tall fence along the eastern property line prior
BP
to requesting a final planning inspection.
12. Prior to issuance of building permits, the owner shall record a deed restriction
BP
designating the project as 100% affordable to low income households for a minimum
term of 55 -years.
City Engineer Conditions
13. A preliminary Storm Water Control Plan (SWCP) must be completed showing how the proposed project will
comply with City and State regulations (Regional Water Quality Control Board Res. No. R3-2013-0032). The
preliminary SWCP shall be completed using the City standard form and should include preliminary calculations
supporting any required treatment or storage areas associated with Drainage Management Areas (DMA).
14. The remodel of existing facilities and the new facilities are subject to the current City sewer fees and said fees
shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits.
15. The applicant shall work with the City Engineer to determine if frontage improvements are feasible and/or
warranted prior to issuance of building permits.
16. The applicant shall work with the City Engineer to determine if additional street lighting is feasible and/or
warranted prior to issuance of building permits.
Fire Department Conditions
17. Show non-skid surface where required per the Fire Code.
m
'm
x
X
W
C?
t�
d N
_G Z
E Q
m
3
is
0
:ri.,
..� .a .rs
t
w
RMW-
Z
Ln
l4
4 C
C Q
CL
'aZ
� Z
J Q
W
H
m
K
W
44
w
It