The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC_2021_10_26_AgendaPacket CITY OF ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA In accordance with City Council Resolution No. 2021-066 and the requirements of AB 361, the City Council Meeting will not be physically open to the public and City Council Members will be teleconferencing into the meeting. HOW TO OBSERVE THE MEETING: To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, the meeting will be live-streamed on SLO-SPAN.org, on Spectrum cable Channel 20 in Atascadero, and on KPRL Radio 1230AM and 99.3FM. The video recording of the meeting will repeat daily on Channel 20 at 1:00 am, 9:00 am, and 6:00 pm and will be available through the City’s website or by visiting https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_ZwJ7a031S3KXauEym9ehaA. HOW TO SUBMIT PUBLIC COMMENT: Members of the public are highly encouraged to participate in live public comment through the Zoom platform using the link above or by calling 805-538-2888 to listen and provide public comment via phone. If you wish to comment but not via a live platform, please email public comments to cityclerk@atascadero.org by 12:00 pm on the day of the meeting. Such email comments must identify the Agenda Item Number in the subject line of the email. The comments will be forwarded to the City Council and made a part of the administrative record. If a comment is received after the deadline for submission but before the close of the meeting, the comment will still be included as a part of the administrative record of the meeting but will be forwarded to the City Council the next business day. Please note, email comments will not be read into the record. AMERICAN DISABILITY ACT ACCOMMODATIONS: Any member of the public who needs accommodations should contact the City Clerk’s Office at cityclerk@atascadero.org or by calling 805-470-3400 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed. The City will use their best efforts to provide reasonable accommodations to afford as much accessibility as possible while also maintaining public safety in accordance with the City procedure for resolving reasonable accommodation requests. City Council agendas and minutes may be viewed on the City's website: www.atascadero.org. Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public inspection on our website, www.atascadero.org. Contracts, Resolutions and Ordinances will be allocated a number once they are approved by the City Council. The Minutes of this meeting will reflect these numbers. All documents submitted by the public during Council meetings that are either read into the record or referred to in their statement will be noted in the Minutes and available for review by contacting the City Clerk's office. All documents will be available for public inspection by appointment during City Hall business hours. Page 1 of 217 CITY OF ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Tuesday, October 26, 2021 City Hall Council Chambers, 4th floor 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, California COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION: 5:00 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL 2. CLOSED SESSION -- PUBLIC COMMENT 3. COUNCIL LEAVES TO BEGIN CLOSED SESSION 4. CLOSED SESSION -- CALL TO ORDER a. Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Govt. Code 54956.8) Real Property: 9510 Calle Milano, Atascadero, CA 93422 Agency Negotiator: Rachelle Rickard, City Manager Negotiating Parties: Curtis J. Coleman and Julie A. Coleman Subject of Negotiations: Price and terms of payment. 5. CLOSED SESSION – ADJOURNMENT 6. COUNCIL RETURNS 7. CLOSED SESSION – REPORT (IF ANY) Announcement(s) of any reportable action(s) taken in Closed Session that occur(s) after the adjournment of Regular Session will be made at the beginning of the next Regular City Council meeting as Closed Session is not recorded or videotaped. City Council Closed Session: 5:00 P.M. City Council Regular Session: 6:00 P.M. Page 2 of 217 REGULAR SESSION – CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Pro Tem Newsom ROLL CALL: Mayor Moreno Mayor Pro Tem Newsom Council Member Bourbeau Council Member Dariz Council Member Funk APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call Recommendation: Council: 1. Approve this agenda; and 2. Waive the reading in full of all ordinances appearing on this agenda, and the titles of the ordinances will be read aloud by the City Clerk at the first reading, after the motion and before the City Council votes. PRESENTATIONS: None. A. CONSENT CALENDAR: (All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the item before action is taken.) 1. City Council Draft Action Minutes – October 12, 2021 ▪ Recommendation: Council approve the October 12, 2021 Draft City Council Regular Meeting Minutes. [City Clerk] 2. September 2021 Accounts Payable and Payroll ▪ Fiscal Impact: $4,201,762.16 ▪ Recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for September 2021. [Administrative Services] 3. El Camino Real Downtown Infrastructure Enhancement Project Design Award ▪ Fiscal Impact: Award of this contract will result in the expenditure of approximately $710,000 of Atascadero Downtown Infrastructure State Budget Allocation funds. ▪ Recommendations: Council: 1. Award a contract to Wallace Group for $598,811 to provide design engineering and construction document preparation for the El Camino Real Downtown Infrastructure Enhancement Project (Project No. C2017T01). 2. Authorize the Director of Administrative Services to allocate $3,000,000 in City of Atascadero Downtown Infrastructure State Budget Allocation Funds to the El Camino Real Downtown Infrastructure Enhancement Project. [Public Works] Page 3 of 217 4. Atascadero Lake Park Improvements for Proposition 68 Parks and Recreation Grant Per Capita Program Funds ▪ Fiscal Impact: The City of Atascadero is eligible to receive $177,952 through the Per Capita Program. The Program requires a 20% local match ($35,590) bringing the total budget amount of the project to $213,524. ▪ Recommendation: Council direct staff to apply for per capita funding through the California Department of Parks and Recreation - Proposition 68 California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate, Costal Protection and Outdoor Access for All Per Capita Program for Lake Park Improvements. [Public Works] 5. Virtual Meetings – AB 361 Requirements ▪ Fiscal Impact: None. ▪ Recommendation: Council adopt Draft Resolution making findings consistent with the requirements of AB 361 to continue to allow for the conduct of virtual meetings. [City Manager] UPDATES FROM THE CITY MANAGER: (The City Manager will give an oral report on any current issues of concern to the City Council.) COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to address the Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Cou ncil has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to three minutes. Please state your name for the record before making your presentation Comments made during Community Forum will not be a subject of discussion. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Commun ity Forum, unless changed by the Council. Any members of the public who have questions or need information may contact the City Clerk’s Office, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at (805) 470-3400, or cityclerk@atascadero.org.) B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None. C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. Affordable Housing Impact Fee Nexus Studies Update ▪ Fiscal Impact: Project costs are covered by grant funding received through Senate Bill 2 (SB 2). ▪ Recommendation: Council review and comment on the nexus study provided by EPS consultants for a potential affordable housing fee program as part of an affordable housing strategy. [Community Development] 2. Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study ▪ Fiscal Impact: The study has no direct costs beyond previously approved consultant costs. ▪ Recommendation: Council receive and file the Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study. [Fire Department] Page 4 of 217 D. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS: (On their own initiative, Council Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities. The following represent standing committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary): Mayor Moreno 1. City Selection Committee 2. County Mayors Round Table 3. Regional Economic Action Coalition (REACH) 4. SLO Council of Governments (SLOCOG) 5. SLO Regional Transit Authority (RTA) Mayor Pro Tem Newsom 1. City / Schools Committee 2. Design Review Committee 3. League of California Cities – Council Liaison 4. Visit SLO CAL Advisory Committee Council Member Bourbeau 1. City of Atascadero Finance Committee 2. City / Schools Committee 3. Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA) 4. SLO County Water Resources Advisory Committee (WRAC) Council Member Dariz 1. Air Pollution Control District 2. California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA) Board 3. City of Atascadero Finance Committee Council Member Funk 1. Atascadero Basin Ground Water Sustainability Agency (GSA) 2. Design Review Committee 3. Homeless Services Oversight Council E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND / OR ACTION: (Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. The Council may take action on items listed on the Agenda.) 1. City Council 2. City Clerk 3. City Treasurer 4. City Attorney 5. City Manager ADJOURN Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. Correspondence submitted at this public hearing will be distributed to the Council and available for review in the City Clerk's office. Page 5 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 10/26/21 Atascadero City Council October 12, 2021 Page 1 of 5 CITY OF ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES Tuesday, October 12, 2021 City Hall Council Chambers, 4th floor 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, California COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION: 5:30 P.M. Mayor Moreno called Closed Session to order at 5:30 p.m. 1. ROLL CALL Present: By Teleconference - Council Members Bourbeau, Dariz and Funk, Mayor Pro Tem Newsom, and Mayor Moreno Absent: None Others Present: None Staff Present: By Teleconference – City Manager Rachelle Rickard, Administrative Services Director Jeri Rangel, City Attorney Brian Pierik, Deputy City Manager/City Clerk Lara Christensen, and IT Manager Luke Knight 2. CLOSED SESSION -- PUBLIC COMMENT – None 3. COUNCIL LEAVES TO BEGIN CLOSED SESSION IT Manager Knight did not attend this portion of the meeting. 4. CLOSED SESSION -- CALL TO ORDER City Council Closed Session: 5:30 P.M. City Council Regular Session: 6:00 P.M. Page 6 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 10/26/21 Atascadero City Council October 12, 2021 Page 2 of 5 a. Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Govt. Code 54956.8) Real Property: 6009 Del Rio Road (APN 049141038 – City Property), 2000 Ramona Road (APN 049141039 – City Property), 2455 El Camino Real (APN 049151056 – People Self Help Housing Property), 6105 Olmeda Avenue (APN 029091001 – State of California Property), Atascadero, California, 93422 Agency Negotiator: Rachelle Rickard, City Manager Negotiating Parties: People Self Help Housing and State of California Subject of Negotiations: Purchase price and/or terms of payment. 5. CLOSED SESSION – ADJOURNMENT 6. COUNCIL RETURNS 7. CLOSED SESSION – REPORT (IF ANY) City Attorney Pierik reported that there was no reportable action from Closed Session REGULAR SESSION – CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 P.M. Mayor Moreno called the meeting to order at 6:0 0 p.m. and Council Member Bourbeau led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: By Teleconference - Council Members Bourbeau, Dariz and Funk, Mayor Pro Tem Newsom, and Mayor Moreno Absent: None Others Present: None Staff Present: By Teleconference – City Manager Rachelle Rickard, Administrative Services Director Jeri Rangel, Community Development Director Phil Dunsmore, Fire Chief Casey Bryson, Public Works Director Nick DeBar, Police Chief Robert Masterson, City Attorney Brian Pierik, Deputy City Manager/City Clerk Lara Christensen, and IT Manager Luke Knight APPROVAL OF AGENDA: MOTION: By Council Member Funk and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Newsom to: 1. Approve this agenda; and, 2. Waive the reading in full of all ordinances appearing on this agenda, and the titles of the ordinances will be read aloud by the City Clerk at the first reading, after the motion and before the City Council votes. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. Page 7 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 10/26/21 Atascadero City Council October 12, 2021 Page 3 of 5 PRESENTATIONS: 1. Proclamation Recognizing October 2021 as Domestic Violence ACTION Month The City Council presented a proclamation to Jennifer Adams, CEO of Lumina Alliance. 2. Proclamation Recognizing September 15 - October 15, 2021 as National Hispanic Heritage Month The City Council presented a proclamation to CR Lara, President of the Latino Outreach Council 3. Proclamation Recognizing October 3-9, 2021 as Fire Prevention Week The City Council presented a proclamation to members of Atascadero Fire & Emergency Services. A. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. City Council Draft Action Minutes – September 28, 2021 ▪ Recommendation: Council approve the September 28, 2021 Draft City Council Regular Meeting Minutes. [City Clerk] 2. Lift Station No. 13 and Force Main Replacement Project - Engineering Design Services Award ▪ Fiscal Impact: $280,735.00 ▪ Recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to execute a contract for $280,735 with MKN & Associates to provide engineering design services for the Lift Station No. 13 and Force Main Replacement Project (Project No. C2020W02). [Public Works] 3. Annexation of the 11885 Halcon Road Subdivision into Community Facilities District 2005-1, Annexation No. 24 (AT 18-0123) ▪ Fiscal Impact: Assessments for this annexation are estimated to be $2,226 annually, adjusted each year for inflation. ▪ Recommendation: Council adopt Draft Resolution, declaring its intention to annex territory, into Community Facilities District 2005-1 (Public Services) as Annexation No. 24 and to authorize the levy of special taxes therein (11885 Halcon Road: AT 18-0123). [Community Development] MOTION: By Council Member Bourbeau and seconded by Council Member Funk to approve the Consent Calendar. (#A-2: Contract No. 2021- 031) (#A-4: Resolution No. 2021-068) Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. UPDATES FROM THE CITY MANAGER: City Manager Rachelle Rickard gave an update on projects and issues within the City. Page 8 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 10/26/21 Atascadero City Council October 12, 2021 Page 4 of 5 COMMUNITY FORUM: The following citizens spoke by telephone or through the webinar on this item: None. Mayor Moreno closed the COMMUNITY FORUM period. B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None. C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. The El Camino Plan - Corridor Study Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant ▪ Fiscal Impact: The study has no direct costs beyond previously approved consultant and staff costs. ▪ Recommendation: Council receive and file the final Draft El Camino Plan. [Community Development] Community Development Director Dunsmore gave the report and answered questions from the Council. PUBLIC COMMENT: The following citizens spoke by telephone or through the webinar on this item: Geoff Auslen Mayor Moreno closed the Public Comment period. Council received and filed the final Draft El Camino Plan D. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS: The following Council Members made brief announcements and gave brief update reports on their committees since their last Council meeting: Mayor Moreno 1. County Mayors Round Table 2. SLO Council of Governments (SLOCOG) 3. SLO Regional Transit Authority (RTA) Mayor Pro Tem Newsom 1. Design Review Committee Council Member Bourbeau 1. Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA) Council Member Dariz 1. California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA) Board Page 9 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 10/26/21 Atascadero City Council October 12, 2021 Page 5 of 5 Council Member Dariz noted attending the CJPIA annual Board Meeting and Risk Management Educational Forum on October 6-8 in San Diego. Council Member Funk 1. Atascadero Basin Ground Water Sustainability Agency (GSA) 2. Design Review Committee E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND / OR ACTION: F. ADJOURN Mayor Moreno recessed the Regular Meeting at 8:05 p.m. MINUTES PREPARED BY: ______________________________________ Lara K. Christensen City Clerk APPROVED: Page 10 of 217 •••ir?i(^mwraE.^"Atascadero City CouncilStaff Report- Administrative Services DepartmentSeptember 2021 Accounts Payable and PayrollRECOMMENDATION:Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checksfor September 2021.DISCUSSION:Attached for City Council review and approval are the following:PayrollDated 9/2/21 Checks # 35231 -35240Direct DepositsDated 9/16/21 Checks #35241 -35250Direct DepositsDated 9/30/21 Checks # 35251 - 35262Direct Deposits$Accounts PayableDated 9/1/21-9/30/21Checks #168666-168938&EFTs 4155-4182TOTAL AMOUNT11,512.32337,880.5211,914.29340,191.7711,373.52308,243.513,180,646.23$ 4,201,762.16FISCAL IMPACT:Total expenditures for all funds is$ 4,201,762.16CERTIFICATION:The undersigned certifies that the attached demands have been released forpayment and that funds are available for these demands..At^l.J^rf l^angel c))ire(itor of Administrative ServicesATTACHMENT:September 2021 Eden Warrant Register in the amount of$ 3,180,646.23ITEM NUMBER: A-2DATE: 10/26/21Page 11 of 217 Check Number Check Date Vendor Description Amount City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of September 2021 4155 09/02/2021 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS HSA 8,721.82Payroll Vendor Payment 168666 09/02/2021 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS HEALTH 192,568.65Payroll Vendor Payment 168667 09/02/2021 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS CO 1,823.15Payroll Vendor Payment 168668 09/02/2021 MEDICAL EYE SERVICES 1,706.60Payroll Vendor Payment 168669 09/02/2021 PREFERRED BENEFITS INSURANCE 8,317.80Payroll Vendor Payment 168670 09/02/2021 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION 80.00Payroll Vendor Payment 168671 09/02/2021 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS 1,741.50Payroll Vendor Payment 168672 09/02/2021 ATASCADERO PROF. FIREFIGHTERS 1,027.05Payroll Vendor Payment 168673 09/02/2021 MASS MUTUAL WORKPLACE SOLUTION 7,504.65Payroll Vendor Payment 168674 09/02/2021 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 1,442.49Payroll Vendor Payment 168675 09/02/2021 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 2,626.87Payroll Vendor Payment 168676 09/02/2021 SEIU LOCAL 620 819.25Payroll Vendor Payment 168677 09/02/2021 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 357.85Payroll Vendor Payment 168678 09/02/2021 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 7,362.44Payroll Vendor Payment 168679 09/02/2021 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 706276 746.00Payroll Vendor Payment 4156 09/03/2021 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 467.07Payroll Vendor Payment 4157 09/03/2021 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 22,107.10Payroll Vendor Payment 4158 09/03/2021 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 29,420.86Payroll Vendor Payment 4159 09/03/2021 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 1,943.09Payroll Vendor Payment 4160 09/03/2021 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 2,697.76Payroll Vendor Payment 4161 09/03/2021 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 5,066.24Payroll Vendor Payment 4162 09/03/2021 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 9,150.09Payroll Vendor Payment 4163 09/03/2021 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 8,444.49Payroll Vendor Payment 4164 09/03/2021 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 13,270.42Payroll Vendor Payment 4165 09/07/2021 RABOBANK, N.A. 69,713.08Payroll Vendor Payment 4166 09/07/2021 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT 22,288.50Payroll Vendor Payment 4167 09/07/2021 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT 2,673.13Payroll Vendor Payment 168680 09/10/2021 13 STARS MEDIA 662.90Accounts Payable Check 168681 09/10/2021 29TONIGHT, INC. 759.17Accounts Payable Check 168682 09/10/2021 AGM CALIFORNIA, INC. 4,663.00Accounts Payable Check 168683 09/10/2021 ALTHOUSE & MEADE, INC. 450.00Accounts Payable Check 168684 09/10/2021 KELLY AREBALO 1,636.26Accounts Payable Check 168685 09/10/2021 AT&T 547.80Accounts Payable Check 168686 09/10/2021 AT&T 770.65Accounts Payable Check 168687 09/10/2021 ATASCADERO HAY & FEED 1,643.96Accounts Payable Check 168689 09/10/2021 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. 35,862.20Accounts Payable Check 168690 09/10/2021 ATASCADERO PICKLEBALL CLUB,INC 633.30Accounts Payable Check 168691 09/10/2021 A-TOWN HUMBLE PIES 85.00Accounts Payable Check 168692 09/10/2021 AURORA WORLD, INC. 139.40Accounts Payable Check 168693 09/10/2021 RICHARD BARTEL 10.00Accounts Payable Check 168694 09/10/2021 BASSETT'S CRICKET RANCH,INC. 223.34Accounts Payable Check 168695 09/10/2021 BELL'S PLUMBING REPAIR, INC. 180.00Accounts Payable Check 168696 09/10/2021 KEITH R. BERGHER 290.00Accounts Payable Check ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 12 of 217 Check Number Check Date Vendor Description Amount City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of September 2021 168697 09/10/2021 BERRY MAN, INC. 926.90Accounts Payable Check 168698 09/10/2021 BURT INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 545.79Accounts Payable Check 168699 09/10/2021 CA HIGHWAY PATROL 200.00Accounts Payable Check 168700 09/10/2021 CCI OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 243.69Accounts Payable Check 168701 09/10/2021 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 4,348.97Accounts Payable Check 168702 09/10/2021 CLEVER CONCEPTS, INC. 47.95Accounts Payable Check 168703 09/10/2021 CRYSTAL CREAMERY, INC. 453.26Accounts Payable Check 168704 09/10/2021 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER 20.00Accounts Payable Check 168705 09/10/2021 NICHOLAS DEBAR 300.00Accounts Payable Check 168706 09/10/2021 JOE DEBRUIN, PH.D. 360.00Accounts Payable Check 168707 09/10/2021 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 191.00Accounts Payable Check 168708 09/10/2021 DESTINATION TRAVEL NETWORK 75.00Accounts Payable Check 168709 09/10/2021 DOOMSDAY SKATE, LLC 210.00Accounts Payable Check 168710 09/10/2021 PHILIP DUNSMORE 300.00Accounts Payable Check 168711 09/10/2021 EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC 4,144.00Accounts Payable Check 168712 09/10/2021 EIKHOF DESIGN GROUP, INC. 24,869.36Accounts Payable Check 168713 09/10/2021 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY 724.99Accounts Payable Check 168714 09/10/2021 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, LLC 1,187.10Accounts Payable Check 168715 09/10/2021 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL 162.00Accounts Payable Check 168716 09/10/2021 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 267.75Accounts Payable Check 168717 09/10/2021 HARRIS STAGE LINES, LLC 900.00Accounts Payable Check 168718 09/10/2021 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINTING 296.61Accounts Payable Check 168719 09/10/2021 IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MGMNT 126.96Accounts Payable Check 168720 09/10/2021 JK'S UNLIMITED, INC. 15,901.97Accounts Payable Check 168721 09/10/2021 K & M INTERNATIONAL 2,230.42Accounts Payable Check 168722 09/10/2021 KIRK CONSTRUCTION 150,549.35Accounts Payable Check 168723 09/10/2021 KNECHT'S PLUMBING & HEATING 3,537.56Accounts Payable Check 168724 09/10/2021 LIFE ASSIST, INC. 2,112.93Accounts Payable Check 168725 09/10/2021 JACKSON LIGHT 1,600.00Accounts Payable Check 168726 09/10/2021 MATTHEW LOUGHERY 843.92Accounts Payable Check 168727 09/10/2021 MADRONE LANDSCAPES, INC. 387.00Accounts Payable Check 168728 09/10/2021 MARBORG INDUSTRIES 312.28Accounts Payable Check 168729 09/10/2021 MICHAEL K. NUNLEY & ASSC, INC. 12,029.15Accounts Payable Check 168730 09/10/2021 MID-COAST GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 2,860.00Accounts Payable Check 168731 09/10/2021 EDWARD J. MILLER, JR. 300.00Accounts Payable Check 168732 09/10/2021 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE 670.29Accounts Payable Check 168733 09/10/2021 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 155.18Accounts Payable Check 168734 09/10/2021 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 1,385.00Accounts Payable Check 168735 09/10/2021 MR. B'S AUTO GLASS 55.00Accounts Payable Check 168736 09/10/2021 MV TRANSPORTATION, INC. 19,633.30Accounts Payable Check 168737 09/10/2021 MWI ANIMAL HEALTH 931.98Accounts Payable Check 168738 09/10/2021 DANIELLE NUNES-HAKANSON 73.58Accounts Payable Check 168739 09/10/2021 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 547.18Accounts Payable Check ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 13 of 217 Check Number Check Date Vendor Description Amount City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of September 2021 168740 09/10/2021 RON OVERACKER 281.00Accounts Payable Check 168742 09/10/2021 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 35,042.79Accounts Payable Check 168743 09/10/2021 PASO ROBLES CHEVROLET 295.00Accounts Payable Check 168744 09/10/2021 PASO ROBLES GLASS 6,480.00Accounts Payable Check 168745 09/10/2021 PEAKWIFI, LLC 650.00Accounts Payable Check 168746 09/10/2021 DEAN PERICIC 2.26Accounts Payable Check 168747 09/10/2021 PFLUMS ATASCADERO MUFFLER 121.75Accounts Payable Check 168748 09/10/2021 PHILLIPS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 1,074.00Accounts Payable Check 168749 09/10/2021 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION, INC. 59.86Accounts Payable Check 168750 09/10/2021 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY,INC. 450.79Accounts Payable Check 168751 09/10/2021 PROSOUND BUSINESS MEDIA, INC. 99.00Accounts Payable Check 168752 09/10/2021 QUINCY ENGINEERING, INC. 20,493.31Accounts Payable Check 168753 09/10/2021 SHIRLEY L. RADCLIFF-BRUTON 1,305.60Accounts Payable Check 168754 09/10/2021 RAINSCAPE, A LANDSCAPE SVC CO. 10,329.55Accounts Payable Check 168755 09/10/2021 JERI RANGEL 300.00Accounts Payable Check 168756 09/10/2021 READYREFRESH BY NESTLE 68.51Accounts Payable Check 168757 09/10/2021 RHODE ISLAND NOVELTY 1,016.40Accounts Payable Check 168758 09/10/2021 RACHELLE RICKARD 799.49Accounts Payable Check 168759 09/10/2021 KIRK ROLES 90.00Accounts Payable Check 168760 09/10/2021 ROLSON MUSIC & SOUND 2,375.00Accounts Payable Check 168761 09/10/2021 CHRISTINA K. SILVA 567.00Accounts Payable Check 168762 09/10/2021 SLO COUNTY HEALTH AGENCY 93,760.00Accounts Payable Check 168763 09/10/2021 SOUZA CONSTRUCTION, INC. 624,873.75Accounts Payable Check 168764 09/10/2021 SPEAKWRITE, LLC. 644.83Accounts Payable Check 168765 09/10/2021 SPECIALIZED EQUIPMENT REPAIR 66.74Accounts Payable Check 168766 09/10/2021 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY 1,004.73Accounts Payable Check 168767 09/10/2021 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL, INC. 1,700.00Accounts Payable Check 168768 09/10/2021 SWANK MOTION PICTURES, INC. 550.00Accounts Payable Check 168769 09/10/2021 TESCO CONTROLS, INC. 8,500.00Accounts Payable Check 168770 09/10/2021 STEVE TIROTTA 141.32Accounts Payable Check 168771 09/10/2021 ULTREX LEASING 263.18Accounts Payable Check 168772 09/10/2021 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AM), INC 49,970.63Accounts Payable Check 168773 09/10/2021 DAVID VAN SON 179.00Accounts Payable Check 168774 09/10/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS 2,092.57Accounts Payable Check 168775 09/10/2021 WALSH ENGINEERING 807.50Accounts Payable Check 168776 09/10/2021 WARM FUZZY TOYS 282.46Accounts Payable Check 168777 09/10/2021 WCJ PROPERTY SERVICES 803.25Accounts Payable Check 168778 09/10/2021 WELL SEEN SIGN CO., LLC 469.69Accounts Payable Check 168779 09/10/2021 WEST COAST AUTO & TOWING, INC. 158.78Accounts Payable Check 168780 09/10/2021 WEX BANK - 76 UNIVERSL 13,488.48Accounts Payable Check 168781 09/10/2021 WEX BANK - WEX FLEET UNIVERSAL 7,964.79Accounts Payable Check 168782 09/10/2021 WHITLOCK & WEINBERGER TRANS. 5,558.25Accounts Payable Check 168783 09/10/2021 WILKINS ACTION GRAPHICS 124.08Accounts Payable Check ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 14 of 217 Check Number Check Date Vendor Description Amount City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of September 2021 168784 09/10/2021 KAREN B. WYKE 699.90Accounts Payable Check 168785 09/10/2021 XO PANDORA 150.00Accounts Payable Check 168786 09/10/2021 ZOO MED LABORATORIES, INC. 1,002.07Accounts Payable Check 168787 09/10/2021 2 MEXICANS, LLC 1,030.00Accounts Payable Check 168788 09/10/2021 ALTHOUSE & MEADE, INC. 143.75Accounts Payable Check 168789 09/10/2021 APPLIED TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. 23,164.91Accounts Payable Check 168790 09/10/2021 ATASCADERO HAY & FEED 151.37Accounts Payable Check 168791 09/10/2021 AVILA TRAFFIC SAFETY 42.68Accounts Payable Check 168792 09/10/2021 CARQUEST OF ATASCADERO 220.40Accounts Payable Check 168793 09/10/2021 K & M INTERNATIONAL 4,503.57Accounts Payable Check 168794 09/10/2021 KID TEES 268.20Accounts Payable Check 168795 09/10/2021 KNECHT'S PLUMBING & HEATING 1,476.89Accounts Payable Check 168796 09/10/2021 PASO ROBLES FORD LINCOLN MERC 375.00Accounts Payable Check 168797 09/10/2021 PAVEMENT ENGINEERING, INC. 30,075.00Accounts Payable Check 168798 09/10/2021 PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE, LLC 53.97Accounts Payable Check 168799 09/10/2021 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY 287.46Accounts Payable Check 168800 09/10/2021 KURT W. STONE 1,200.00Accounts Payable Check 168801 09/10/2021 WATER SYSTEMS CONSULTING, INC. 6,576.25Accounts Payable Check 4168 09/14/2021 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON 623,706.25Accounts Payable Check 4169 09/16/2021 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS HSA 8,721.82Payroll Vendor Payment 168802 09/16/2021 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION 80.00Payroll Vendor Payment 168803 09/16/2021 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS 1,741.50Payroll Vendor Payment 168804 09/16/2021 ATASCADERO PROF. FIREFIGHTERS 1,027.05Payroll Vendor Payment 168805 09/16/2021 MASS MUTUAL WORKPLACE SOLUTION 18,355.31Payroll Vendor Payment 168806 09/16/2021 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 1,533.66Payroll Vendor Payment 168807 09/16/2021 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 2,626.87Payroll Vendor Payment 168808 09/16/2021 SEIU LOCAL 620 821.41Payroll Vendor Payment 168809 09/16/2021 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 357.85Payroll Vendor Payment 168810 09/16/2021 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 14,188.59Payroll Vendor Payment 168811 09/16/2021 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 706276 746.00Payroll Vendor Payment 4170 09/17/2021 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 467.07Payroll Vendor Payment 4171 09/17/2021 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 22,125.18Payroll Vendor Payment 4172 09/17/2021 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 29,742.64Payroll Vendor Payment 4173 09/17/2021 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 1,927.13Payroll Vendor Payment 4174 09/17/2021 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 2,698.04Payroll Vendor Payment 4175 09/17/2021 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 5,066.24Payroll Vendor Payment 4176 09/17/2021 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 8,901.50Payroll Vendor Payment 4177 09/17/2021 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 8,489.23Payroll Vendor Payment 4178 09/17/2021 CALIF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM 13,188.00Payroll Vendor Payment 4179 09/21/2021 RABOBANK, N.A. 69,812.38Payroll Vendor Payment 4180 09/21/2021 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT 22,229.38Payroll Vendor Payment 4181 09/21/2021 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT 2,947.26Payroll Vendor Payment 168812 09/24/2021 KELLY AREBALO 85.50Accounts Payable Check ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 15 of 217 Check Number Check Date Vendor Description Amount City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of September 2021 168813 09/24/2021 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 4,394.59Accounts Payable Check 168814 09/24/2021 COLETTE LAYTON 1,938.00Accounts Payable Check 168815 09/24/2021 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO. INC 1,428.00Accounts Payable Check 168816 09/24/2021 MEYER TREE CONSULTING 215.00Accounts Payable Check 168817 09/24/2021 NORTH COAST ENGINEERING INC. 61.00Accounts Payable Check 168818 09/24/2021 SLO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 210.00Accounts Payable Check 168819 09/24/2021 SMART AND FINAL 142.98Accounts Payable Check 168820 09/24/2021 WHITLOCK & WEINBERGER TRANS. 357.50Accounts Payable Check 168821 09/24/2021 13 STARS MEDIA 3,717.10Accounts Payable Check 168822 09/24/2021 A & T ARBORISTS & VEGETATION 10,200.00Accounts Payable Check 168823 09/24/2021 ACTIVE 911, INC. 494.00Accounts Payable Check 168824 09/24/2021 ADAMSKI,MOROSKI,MADDEN, 1,451.00Accounts Payable Check 168825 09/24/2021 AGP VIDEO, INC. 1,425.00Accounts Payable Check 168826 09/24/2021 AK & COMPANY 1,750.00Accounts Payable Check 168827 09/24/2021 ALPHA ELECTRIC SERVICE 300.00Accounts Payable Check 168828 09/24/2021 ALTHOUSE & MEADE, INC. 180.00Accounts Payable Check 168829 09/24/2021 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSC 720.00Accounts Payable Check 168830 09/24/2021 AMERICAN WEST TIRE & AUTO INC 3,776.49Accounts Payable Check 168831 09/24/2021 AMERIGAS 128.33Accounts Payable Check 168833 09/24/2021 AT&T 1,157.79Accounts Payable Check 168834 09/24/2021 AT&T 1,205.69Accounts Payable Check 168835 09/24/2021 AVILA TRAFFIC SAFETY 67.97Accounts Payable Check 168836 09/24/2021 BELL'S PLUMBING REPAIR, INC. 260.00Accounts Payable Check 168837 09/24/2021 JOSE R. BENITEZ 120.00Accounts Payable Check 168838 09/24/2021 BREZDEN PEST CONTROL, INC. 170.00Accounts Payable Check 168839 09/24/2021 CASEY BRYSON 118.00Accounts Payable Check 168840 09/24/2021 BURKE,WILLIAMS, & SORENSON LLP 34,202.70Accounts Payable Check 168841 09/24/2021 CA DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE 2,516.00Accounts Payable Check 168842 09/24/2021 CALLYO 2,160.00Accounts Payable Check 168843 09/24/2021 CAR EL, INC. 3,396.40Accounts Payable Check 168844 09/24/2021 CARQUEST OF ATASCADERO 55.51Accounts Payable Check 168846 09/24/2021 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 4,241.74Accounts Payable Check 168847 09/24/2021 COASTAL REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES 122.61Accounts Payable Check 168848 09/24/2021 COBAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 125.00Accounts Payable Check 168849 09/24/2021 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 387.00Accounts Payable Check 168850 09/24/2021 DEPT. OF THE CA HIGHWAY PATROL 905.85Accounts Payable Check 168851 09/24/2021 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES INC 6,560.36Accounts Payable Check 168852 09/24/2021 EARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC 2,505.00Accounts Payable Check 168853 09/24/2021 EL CAMINO CAR WASH 100.00Accounts Payable Check 168854 09/24/2021 EMERGENCY VEHICLE SPECIALISTS 10,410.57Accounts Payable Check 168855 09/24/2021 ESTRELLA WARBIRDS MUSEUM, INC 500.00Accounts Payable Check 168856 09/24/2021 JENNIFER FANNING 77.00Accounts Payable Check 168857 09/24/2021 FENCE FACTORY ATASCADERO 3,044.93Accounts Payable Check ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 16 of 217 Check Number Check Date Vendor Description Amount City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of September 2021 168858 09/24/2021 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, LLC 568.80Accounts Payable Check 168859 09/24/2021 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL 4,371.00Accounts Payable Check 168860 09/24/2021 GAS COMPANY 475.66Accounts Payable Check 168861 09/24/2021 GIERLICH-MITCHELL, INC. 106,934.45Accounts Payable Check 168862 09/24/2021 KELLY GLEASON 45.58Accounts Payable Check 168863 09/24/2021 MARK D. GREENAWAY 30.00Accounts Payable Check 168864 09/24/2021 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINTING 1,522.06Accounts Payable Check 168865 09/24/2021 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS 1,514.97Accounts Payable Check 168866 09/24/2021 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1,248.86Accounts Payable Check 168867 09/24/2021 JPW COMMUNICATIONS 1,000.00Accounts Payable Check 168868 09/24/2021 STEVEN KAHN 207.18Accounts Payable Check 168869 09/24/2021 KPRL 1230 AM 820.00Accounts Payable Check 168870 09/24/2021 KRITZ EXCAVATING & TRUCKNG INC 687.26Accounts Payable Check 168871 09/24/2021 KW CONSTRUCTION 18,437.57Accounts Payable Check 168872 09/24/2021 L.N. CURTIS & SONS 3,187.39Accounts Payable Check 168873 09/24/2021 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO. INC 2,584.33Accounts Payable Check 168874 09/24/2021 KENNETH LERNO 129.53Accounts Payable Check 168875 09/24/2021 LIFE ASSIST, INC. 802.31Accounts Payable Check 168876 09/24/2021 MARBORG INDUSTRIES 400.00Accounts Payable Check 168877 09/24/2021 MARK'S TIRE SERVICE 1,977.10Accounts Payable Check 168878 09/24/2021 MEDINA LIGHT SHOW DESIGNS 1,900.00Accounts Payable Check 168879 09/24/2021 METRO MEDIA 495.00Accounts Payable Check 168880 09/24/2021 MEYER TREE CONSULTING 1,897.50Accounts Payable Check 168881 09/24/2021 MID-COAST GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 1,980.00Accounts Payable Check 168882 09/24/2021 MINER'S ACE HARDWARE 275.86Accounts Payable Check 168883 09/24/2021 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 536.08Accounts Payable Check 168884 09/24/2021 MOSS, LEVY, & HARTZHEIM LLP 7,000.00Accounts Payable Check 168885 09/24/2021 NORTH COAST ENGINEERING INC. 1,523.50Accounts Payable Check 168886 09/24/2021 NOWDOCS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 387.15Accounts Payable Check 168887 09/24/2021 OASIS EQUIPMENT RENTAL 428.34Accounts Payable Check 168888 09/24/2021 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 1,134.70Accounts Payable Check 168889 09/24/2021 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC 955.07Accounts Payable Check 168890 09/24/2021 DAWN PATTERSON 87.36Accounts Payable Check 168891 09/24/2021 PERRY'S PARCEL & GIFT 27.96Accounts Payable Check 168892 09/24/2021 PFLUMS ATASCADERO MUFFLER 200.00Accounts Payable Check 168893 09/24/2021 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY,INC. 1,882.89Accounts Payable Check 168894 09/24/2021 QUADIENT, INC. 696.75Accounts Payable Check 168895 09/24/2021 RAMINHA CONSTRUCTION, INC. 93,871.11Accounts Payable Check 168896 09/24/2021 RANGE MASTER 3,429.98Accounts Payable Check 168897 09/24/2021 READYREFRESH BY NESTLE 129.09Accounts Payable Check 168898 09/24/2021 ROB REYNOLDS CONSTRUCTION, INC 131,731.77Accounts Payable Check 168899 09/24/2021 SAM'S TREE 805, INC. 975.00Accounts Payable Check 168900 09/24/2021 SAN LUIS POWERHOUSE, INC. 945.79Accounts Payable Check ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 17 of 217 Check Number Check Date Vendor Description Amount City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of September 2021 168901 09/24/2021 SANCON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 12,000.00Accounts Payable Check 168902 09/24/2021 SIGTRONICS CORP. 947.77Accounts Payable Check 168903 09/24/2021 SLO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 597.00Accounts Payable Check 168904 09/24/2021 RYAN SMITH 250.00Accounts Payable Check 168905 09/24/2021 SOUTH COAST EMERGENCY VEH SVC 609.79Accounts Payable Check 168906 09/24/2021 BRUCE ST. JOHN 222.92Accounts Payable Check 168907 09/24/2021 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY 367.20Accounts Payable Check 168908 09/24/2021 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 232.96Accounts Payable Check 168909 09/24/2021 SWANK MOTION PICTURES, INC. 550.00Accounts Payable Check 168910 09/24/2021 MADALYN TARR 40.25Accounts Payable Check 168911 09/24/2021 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS, LLC 500.53Accounts Payable Check 168912 09/24/2021 THOMSON REUTERS - WEST 175.10Accounts Payable Check 168917 09/24/2021 U.S. BANK 33,335.16Accounts Payable Check 168918 09/24/2021 ULTREX BUSINESS PRODUCTS 30.40Accounts Payable Check 168919 09/24/2021 ULTREX LEASING 263.18Accounts Payable Check 168920 09/24/2021 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AM), INC 4,357.59Accounts Payable Check 168921 09/24/2021 USA BLUE BOOK 459.64Accounts Payable Check 168922 09/24/2021 DAVID VAN SON 118.00Accounts Payable Check 168923 09/24/2021 VERDIN 12,754.60Accounts Payable Check 168924 09/24/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS 327.46Accounts Payable Check 168925 09/24/2021 VINO VICE, INC. 528.00Accounts Payable Check 168926 09/24/2021 VITAL RECORDS CONTROL 826.40Accounts Payable Check 168927 09/24/2021 WALLACE GROUP 10,525.86Accounts Payable Check 168928 09/24/2021 WELL SEEN SIGN CO., LLC 3,700.72Accounts Payable Check 168929 09/24/2021 WEST COAST AUTO & TOWING, INC. 130.00Accounts Payable Check 168930 09/24/2021 WHITLOCK & WEINBERGER TRANS. 570.00Accounts Payable Check 168931 09/24/2021 WOODS HUMANE SOCIETY 4,750.00Accounts Payable Check 4182 09/30/2021 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS HSA 8,721.82Payroll Vendor Payment 168932 09/30/2021 ATASCADERO PROF. FIREFIGHTERS 1,027.05Payroll Vendor Payment 168933 09/30/2021 MASS MUTUAL WORKPLACE SOLUTION 7,730.49Payroll Vendor Payment 168934 09/30/2021 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 1,080.20Payroll Vendor Payment 168935 09/30/2021 SEIU LOCAL 620 792.85Payroll Vendor Payment 168936 09/30/2021 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 106099 357.85Payroll Vendor Payment 168937 09/30/2021 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 304633 6,310.41Payroll Vendor Payment 168938 09/30/2021 VANTAGEPOINT TRNSFR AGT 706276 746.00Payroll Vendor Payment $ 3,180,646.23 ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 18 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: A-3 DATE: 10/26/21 Atascadero City Council Staff Report – Public Works Department El Camino Real Downtown Infrastructure Enhancement Project Design Award RECOMMENDATIONS: Council: 1. Award a contract to Wallace Group for $598,811 to provide design engineering and construction document preparation for the El Camino Real Downtown Infrastructure Enhancement Project (Project No. C2017T01). 2. Authorize the Director of Administrative Services to allocate $3,000,000 in City of Atascadero Downtown Infrastructure State Budget A llocation Funds to the El Camino Real Downtown Infrastructure Enhancement Project. REPORT IN BRIEF: The El Camino Real Downtown Infrastructure Enhancement Plan (the Project) has been developed and refined since the Project was formally initiated in August 2017. Over the following three years, multiple options were considered, with preferred design alternatives refined through a process of public input, City department review, Council direction, and technical analysis of traffic modeling and safety cons iderations. The selected alternative was approved by Council in August 2020. The City is now in a position to initiate final engineering design services to provide detailed plans, specifications and estimates to make the Project “shovel ready”. DISCUSSION: Background The approved El Camino Real Downtown Infrastructure Enhancement Plan is a planning level document that outlines recommendations for road improvements incorporating enhanced pedestrian and bicycle access along with increased parking opportunities and safer crosswalks. The primary goal is public safety for all roadway users: pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists. A second goal is to enhance economic development in the downtown by creating a zone that slows traffic speeds, enhances appearance and safety, and increases parking. The Plan extents include the El Camino Corridor from the intersection of Highway 41 to the intersection of Rosario Avenue. Page 19 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: A-3 DATE: 10/26/21 The overall objective for the reconstruction of this segment of roadway has been consistent since inception in 2017 - to develop a holistic corridor plan within the Downtown El Camino Real Corridor that considers the needs and goals of all multimodal users, residents, businesses, and City leaders. The Project was formally initiated in 2017, with KTUA of San Diego hired in November 2017 to assist the City in the analysis and development of a corridor plan. Central Coast Transportation Consulting (CCTC) of Morro Bay worked as a sub consultant to KTUA to provide traffic engineering and operations analysis. Project objectives, identified early in the process, have driven the conceptual design. These objectives include the following: • Provide public safety for all roadway users by incorporating complete streets and “road diet” concepts and principles • Enhance economic development by supporting existing and future merchants with additional parking • Support Downtown business synergy through a partnership in crafting a downtown traffic calming plan • Enhance the streetscape of El Camino Real by creating a se nse of place and arrival into the Downtown • Create safe pedestrian connections and crossings while enhancing the walkability of Downtown • Slow vehicular speeds to increase safety and visibility, including an analysis of impacts to level of service (LOS). • Enhance the ability to host more special events in the Downtown area • Accommodate multi-modal transportation, where feasible After evaluation of multiple options, a traffic analysis was conducted in early 2018, and a series of public outreach/feedback workshops were in initiated in August 2018. Twelve workshop events took place, both in person and virtually, that included a presentation and small breakout sessions with City staff. Participants included residents, business owners, and other interested persons who completed feedback survey forms that contained questions to assist the City in determining appropriateness of the draft concept plans. The draft concept plans were revised based upon feedback and presented, along with a summary of public feedback, to the Council at their August 11, 2020 meeting. Council approved the concept plans for the Project at that meeting. As part of the FY 2021-2023 Budget, funds were authorized to provide design engineering services to take the Plan from concept drawings to a Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) package ready for bidding and construction. Analysis Staff prepared a Request for Proposal (RFP) and solicited proposals in July 2021 from qualified consultants to provide design services and prepare construction plans and specifications for the Project. Most engineering projects are largely the responsibility of the Public Works Department and involve a clearly defined design objective requiring preparation of plans, specification and estimates for bidding. In contrast, the El Camino Real Downtown Infrastructure Enhancement Project will incorporate multiple departments within the City, most notably Community Development and Public Works. While the Page 20 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: A-3 DATE: 10/26/21 concept plan has been developed and approved by Council, the upcoming design process is extensive and will include refining design concepts, defining cohesive design elements and materials types, identification of engineering constraints and opportunities, and preparation of a complete bid package for construction. It is anticipated that this process will include opportunities for public and Council review and input, and significant interdepartmental coordination with the selected consultant design team to ensure the Project meets current and future needs. Major components of this design effort are as follows: - Topographic Survey, Geotechnical Investigation and Utility Research and Coordination - Preliminary Engineering and Cost Estimating o Concept Refinement o Conceptual Streetscaping and Landscaping Plan o Stormwater Facilities and Downtown Watershed Plan Implementation o Preliminary Cost Estimating - Preparation of Design Plans, Specifications and Estimates o Civil Improvements o Landscaping and Irrigation o Electrical and Lighting o Traffic Signal Modifications Staff received five proposals from highly qualified consultants including Wallace Group, Quincy Engineering, Rick Engineering, GHD and BKF Engineers. Proposals were individually reviewed and scored by a selection committee comprised of Public Works and Community Development staff based upon experience with similar projects, responsiveness to City needs, experience of key personnel , and other factors. Staff invited the top three rated consultant teams for in person interviews, held on September 23, 2021. After completion of interviews, staff determined that the design team led by Wallace Group was best qualified to provide engineering services for this project. The consultant team includes KTUA, CCTC, Earth Systems Pacific, and Kittleson & Associates. Amongst other qualifications, this team provides continuity, as the core members were involved throughout the conceptual design process. Wallace Group provided a detailed fee estimate worksheet with their proposal that included labor hours/costs, reimbursable expenses, and subconsultant fees for the work scope identified in the City’s request for proposals. Staff reviewed Wallace Group’s work scope and fee and have determined that it is reasonable. Staff is recommending awarding a contract with Wallace Group on a labor plus reimbursable basis for an estimated maximum fee of $598,811 for design engineering services for the Project. Design work is anticipated to take approximately ten months to complete. Staff anticipates having a PS&E package ready for bidding in the fall of 2022. At this time, full construction funding sources are not finalized, but efforts to fully fund the project will be undertaken by staff concurrent with engineering design efforts. The adopted budget (FY21/22) includes $650,000 in Local Transportation Funds for the Project. In addition to the available Local Transportation Funds, State Senator Laird was Page 21 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: A-3 DATE: 10/26/21 successful in securing a $3,000,000 State budget allocation for the City to be used for downtown infrastructure. While the exact grant requirements have not yet been received by the City, it is anticipated that the State will require that the funds be spent quickly. Staff is recommending that the City use the State Downtown Infrastructure funds on the Project, before using any other available funds including the budgeted Local Transportation Funds. This will help ensure that the funds are spent in a timely manner. As the design is developed and community input received, it is anticipated additional design services may be necessary. Staff is estimating a total cost of about $710,000 for this phase of the Project. This estimated cost would include the base contract cost of $598,811 for Wallace Group, anticipated supplemental design services, and staff time A preliminary construction cost estimate of about $7,600,000 was prepared by staff for the concept plan that includes construction contingencies, administrative support, inspection, testing, and other construction related costs. This estimate is very preliminary since design elements are not yet known. The final design phase will allow a much more accurate cost estimate by identifying actual design elements and actual work scope and quantities. The final design process will provide the City an opportunity to evaluate various options and associated costs to include in the final construction plans and specifications. FISCAL IMPACT: Award of this contract will result in the expenditure of approximately $7 10,000 of Atascadero Downtown Infrastructure State Budget Allocation funds. Conceptual Design Phase 131,160$ Final Design Design Engineering Contract (Wallace group)598,811$ Design Engineering Contingency (10%)59,880 Design Support 50,000 708,691 Construction costs 5,000,000 Testing, inspection and support (15%)750,000 Construction Contingency (20%)1,000,000 Total Estimated Expenditures after conceptual design phase 7,589,851$ Circulation System Funds 131,160$ Local Transportation Funds 650,000 California State Budget Allocation 3,000,000 Total Available Revenue after conceptual design phase 3,781,160$ Net Funding (Shortfall) after conceptual design phase (3,808,691)$ ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES ESTIMATED REVENUES Page 22 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: A-3 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: El Camino Real Downtown Infrastructure Enhancement Concept Plan Page 23 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: A-3DATE: 10/26/21ATTACHMENT: 1Page 24 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 Atascadero City Council Staff Report – Public Works Department Atascadero Lake Park Improvements for Proposition 68 Parks and Recreation Grant Per Capita Program Funds RECOMMENDATION: Council direct staff to apply for per capita funding through the California Department of Parks and Recreation - Proposition 68 California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate, Costal Protection and Outdoor Access for All Per Capita Program for Lake Park Improvements. DISCUSSION: Background On October 22, 2019, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2019 -080, authorizing an application for the Per Capita Grant Program with the State Department of Parks and Recreation. The Per Capita Program is part of the California voter approved Proposition 68, the Parks and Water Bond Act of 2018 (Senate Bill 5). Proposition 68 bond proceeds have created grant programs for drought, water, parks, climate, coastal protection, and outdoor access. Specifically, the Per Capita Program provides $177,952 to the City for local park rehabilitation, creation and improvements. Under this program, grant recipients are encouraged to utilize awards to rehabilitate existing infrastructure and to address deficiencies in neighborhoods lacking access to the outdoors. The process to obtain these grant funds was initiated by the City Council’s adoption of the Resolution on October 22, 2019 and subsequent submission to the Office of Grants and Local Services (OGALS) in November 2019. As part of that Council agenda item, staff provided preliminary considerations of needs for park and recreation improvements at Paloma Creek Park, Colony Park Community Center, Atascadero Lake Park and the Zoo with the intent to come back before the Council with a final recommendation for the allocation of the grant funding. Since that time, staff continued to review and prioritize the needs of the City’s parks and recreation features, focusing on replacement and enhancement to maximize community safety and access. Analysis As part of the Measure D-20 outreach and prioritization, the City identified repairs and replacements to various infrastructure and amenities at Atascadero Lake Park to be a Measure D-20 Tier 1 priority. Staff is recommending that the Council allocate anticipated Prop. 68 grant funding toward sidewalk improvements to meet ADA accessibility requirements, along with replacement of the lake pier, at Atascadero Lake Park. These improvements are located along the shoreline in and around the paddleboat rental and lake Page 25 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 pier (behind the band shell). Given the condition of these aging facilities, coupled with the increased popularity of fishing and new energy with a new paddleboat vendor, staff considered these improvements to be an excellent beneficiary of Proposition 68 funding. The Atascadero Lake Park pier, portions of which were likely built over 70 years ago, received its last significant rebuild in 1996. The pier is utilized by community members to enjoy the views of Atascadero Lake and recreational fishing. Atascadero Lake Park is one of the community’s major attractions and is a popular public space throughout the year for residents and visitors alike while offering a number of amenities, including the Charles Paddock Zoo. The pier is constructed primarily of wood, with wood pilings and a concrete foundation that rests on the lake bed. The pier is currently in a state of disrepair and has been closed since the summer due to rotten structural wood members and railing. Funding from the grant would be used for the design and construction of a replacement pier that would meet ADA requirements. The sidewalk betweeen the pier and the paddleboat concessionaire (behind the band shell), and leading from the upper restrooms, does not meet current ADA standards. Access to this area is challenging, primarily during the summer months when many community events are held at the park. Specifically, the grant funding would be used to replace sidewalks and construct a ramp near the paddleboat vendor to allow accessibility to the vendor and new pier. Should the Council choose to move forward with these improvements, staff will include a detailed description of the project and required environmental documents with the grant application package. The proposed design of the new pier will feature floating platforms attached to the pathway, enabling the gangway slope to adjust based upon the height of the water level. The p ier is also proposed to extend further into the lake with a ‘T’ shape end, allowing additional room for visitors and fisherpersons to access the lake. The grant application is due to OGALS by December 31, 2021. Per the grant requirements, the park improvements must be completed by June 30, 2023. The Prop 68 grant match for the pier and sidewalk improvements are part of the City’s 2021-23 Budget. Should the City not receive the per capita grant funding, staff will come back to Council with a funding plan and prioritization of park safety projects. Lake Park Pier Portion of sidewalk to receive ADA upgrades Page 26 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The California Environmental Quality Act does not apply to the recommended action in this report, because the action does not constitute a “Project” under CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15378. The grant application will include the required environmental report, which will be conducted by the Planning Department. FISCAL IMPACT: The City of Atascadero is eligible to receive $177,952 through the Per Capita Program. The Program requires a 20% local match ($35,590) bringing the total budget amount of the project to $213,524. The matching funds for the grant are budgeted as part of the Measure D-20 Parks Repair and Replacement line item. ALTERNATIVES: Council may choose not to approve the proposed Atascadero Lake Park improvements with anticipated funding by the Per Capita Program. Should this occur, staff requests specific direction on projects to pursue for funding by the grant. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Preliminary site map 2. Per Capita Program Procedural Guide Page 27 of 217 Legend Proposed Pier Replacement Sidewalk/Path Improvements ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 28 of 217 1 2018-2019 California State Budget, Chapter 29 Budget Item 3790-101-6088 (b) - $185,000,000 shall be available for the Local Park Rehabilitation, Creation in Urban Areas Program, consistent with subdivision (a) of Section 80061 of the Public Resources Code. Procedural Guide for the California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access for All Act of 2018 PER CAPITA PROGRAM September 2020 State of California The Natural Resources Agency Department of Parks and Recreation Office of Grants and Local Services (OGALS) “Creating Community through People, Parks, and Programs” Send correspondence to: Street Address for Overnight Mail: Mailing Address: Calif. Dept. of Parks and Recreation Office of Grants and Local Services 1416 Ninth Street, Room 918 Sacramento, CA 95814 Calif. Dept. of Parks and Recreation Office of Grants and Local Services P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 Phone: (916) 653-7423 Website: http://www.parks.ca.gov/grants ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 29 of 217 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Department Mission The mission of the California Department of Parks and Recreation is to provide for the health, inspiration, and education of the people of California by helping to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological diversity, protecting its most valued natural and cultural resources, and creating opportunities for high-quality outdoor recreation. Community Engagement Division Mission The mission of the Community Engagement Division is to encourage healthy communities by connecting people to parks, supporting innovative recreational opportunities, embracing diversity, fostering inclusivity, and delivering superior customer service, with integrity for the enrichment of all. The Office of Grants and Local Services Mission The mission of the Office of Grants and Local Services is to address California’s diverse recreational, cultural and historical resource needs by developing grant programs, administering funds, offering technical assistance, building partnerships and providing leadership through quality customer service. OGALS VISION GOALS To Be: •A leader among park and recreation professionals. •Proactive in anticipating public park and recreation needs and how new legislation and grant programs could best meet these needs. •Honest, knowledgeable and experienced grant administration facilitators. •Sensitive to local concerns while mindful of prevailing laws, rules and regulations. •Perceptive to opportunities for partnerships, growth and renewal where few existed before. •Committed to providing quality customer service in every interaction and transaction. •Responsive to the needs of applicants, grantees, nonprofit organizations, local governments, legislative members, and department employees. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 30 of 217 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS PER CAPITA PROGRAM DESCRIPTION ........................................................................ 4 Eligible Recipients (PRC §80062) ...................................................................................... 4 Eligible Projects.................................................................................................................. 5 GRANT PROCESS OVERVIEW........................................................................................ 6 Authorizing Resolution ....................................................................................................... 7 APPLICATION PACKET ................................................................................................. 10 Application Packet Checklist ............................................................................................ 11 Per Capita Project Application Form ................................................................................ 12 Per Capita Match ............................................................................................................. 13 Acquisition Projects .......................................................................................................... 14 Development Projects ...................................................................................................... 16 Development Project Scope/Cost Estimate Form ............................................................ 19 Funding Sources Form ..................................................................................................... 20 CEQA Compliance Certification ......................................... ............................................. 21 Land Tenure ..................................................................................................................... 22 Site Plan ........................................................................................................................... 24 Sub-leases or Agreements ............................................................................................... 24 Photos .............................................................................................................................. 24 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction and Carbon Sequestration ................................. 24 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................ 26 Status Report ................................................................................................................... 26 Bond Act Sign .................................................................... ............................................. 28 Deed Restriction............................................................................................................... 29 GRANT PAYMENTS ....................................................................................................... 33 Payment Request Form ................................................................................................... 35 Grant Expenditure Form ................................................................................................... 35 Project Completion Packet ............................................................................................... 37 PER CAPITA CONTRACT .............................................................................................. 42 ACCOUNTING AND AUDITS .......................................................................................... 48 Accounting Requirements ................................................................................................ 49 Audit Checklist ................................................................................................................. 50 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 50 Public Resources Code relating to the Proposition 68 Per Capita program ..................... 51 Allocation Tables .............................................................................................................. 54 ALLOCATION TRANSFER ............................................................................................. 54 DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................. 55 Words and terms shown in SMALL CAPS are in the definitions section. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 31 of 217 4 Per Capita Program Summary Background This program originates from Proposition 68, placed on the ballot via Senate Bill 5 (DeLeon, Chapter 852, statutes of 2017), and approved by voters on June 5, 2018. Funds for the program were appropriated via State Budget item 3790-101-6088(b). Legislative program information is found in the Public Resources Code (PRC) beginning at §80000 (see page 51). OGALS retains the right to waive requirements not mandated by statute. Funds are provided for two programs, as described below: General Per Capita Program: $185,000,000 Funds are available for local park rehabilitation, creation, and improvement grants to local governments on a per capita basis. Grant recipients are encouraged to utilize awards to rehabilitate existing infrastructure and to address deficiencies in neighborhoods lacking access to the outdoors (PRC §80061(a)). Urban County Per Capita: $13,875,000 Additional funds are available for Per Capita grants to cities and districts in urbanized counties (a county with a population of 500,000 or more) providing park and recreation services within jurisdictions of 200,000 or less in population. An entity eligible to receive funds under this subdivision shall also be eligible to receive funds available under the General Per Capita Program (PRC §80061(b)). Eligible Recipients (PRC §80062) Sixty percent (60%) of the General Per Capita funds are allocated to the following entities based on population. The minimum allocation is $200,000. • Cities • Eligible Districts, other than a regional park district, regional park and open-space districts, and regional open-space districts1 Forty percent (40%) of the General Per Capita funds are allocated to the following entities based on population. The minimum allocation is $400,000. • Counties • Regional park districts, regional park and open space districts, and regional open space districts Allocations Visit OGALS’ Per Capita webpage at www.parks.ca.gov/percapita for allocations. 1 For purposes of this chapter, “district” means any regional park district, regional park and open-space district, or regional open-space district formed pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with §5500) of Chapter 3 of Division 5, any recreation and park district formed pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with §5780) of Division 5, or any authority formed pursuant to Division 26 (commencing with §35100). With respect to any community or unincorporated region that is not included within a district, and in which no city or county provides parks or recreational areas or facilities, “district” also means any other entity, including, but not limited to, a district operating multiple-use parklands pursuant to Division 20 (commencing with §71000) of the Water Code. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 32 of 217 5 Eligible Projects •PROJECTS must be capital outlay for recreational purposes, either acquisition or DEVELOPMENT. Do not submit combined acquisition and DEVELOPMENT projects, rather submit separate APPLICATION PACKETS for each PROJECT type. •Multiple PROJECTS may be completed under one contract; each PROJECT requires a separate APPLICATION PACKET. •A PROJECT can only have one location. One PROJECT serving several parks is not permitted. •GRANTEES are encouraged to partner with other GRANTEES on PROJECTS (PRC §80063(b)). See page 54 for information on allocation transfers. Match PROJECTS not serving a “severely disadvantaged community” (median household income less than 60% of the statewide average) require a 20% match (see page 13) (PRC §80061(c)). No Supplanting GRANTEES must use Per Capita grant funds to supplement existing expenditures, rather than replace them (PRC §80062(d)). For example, a GRANTEE has a budget for recreational capital expenditures of $500,000 per year, and is receiving a $200,000 allocation under the Per Capita program. The budget cannot be reduced to $300,000, with the Per Capita funds making up the difference. Similarly, if a PROJECT has been approved by the governing body, and a funding source has been identified, Per Capita funds cannot be swapped in as a new funding source unless the prior funding source is applied to other identified recreational capital projects. GRANTEES should keep all documents indicating intent to use Per Capita grant funds for PROJECTS. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 33 of 217 6 Grant Process Overview The GRANT PERFORMANCE PERIOD is shown on the contract. Visit OGALS’ Per Capita webpage at www.parks.ca.gov/percapita for deadlines and current information on each step in the process listed below. 1.OGALS Mandatory Grant Administration Workshops will be held statewide. All recipients are required to attend. 2.Resolution: GRANTEE passes one resolution approving the filing of all applications associated with the contract, and provides a copy to OGALS. 3.APPLICATION PACKET(s): The GRANTEE defines the PROJECT SCOPE(s) and amount of GRANT funds needed for each PROJECT. As PROJECTS are identified, the GRANTEE submits individual APPLICATION PACKET(s) to OGALS. OGALS reviews each APPLICATION PACKET and sends a letter of approval to the GRANTEE or requests additional information. 4.Contract: OGALS sends a contract to the GRANTEE once the OGALS has received and approved APPLICATION PACKET(S) equaling the total contract amount. a.The contract section, beginning on page 42, includes a sample contract. b. The GRANTEE must return the contract signed by the AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE to OGALS. c.OGALS returns a copy of the fully executed contract to the GRANTEE. 5.Payments and end of GRANT PERFORMANCE PERIOD: GRANTEE requests payments for eligible costs. The grant payments section, beginning on page 33, provides payment request instructions and forms. a. The GRANTEE may request payments after each PROJECT is approved by OGALS. b. The GRANTEE completes PROJECT SCOPE(s). c.The GR ANTEE sends PROJECT COMPLETION PACKET(s) to OGALS. d.OGALS processes the final payment request after each PROJECT is complete as documented by the GRANTEE in the PROJECT COMPLETION PACKET, and as verified by OGALS by conducting a site inspection. 6.Accounting and Audit: DPR’s Audits Office may conduct an audit. The GRANTEE is required to retain all PROJECT records, including source documentation with original signatures, for five years following issuance of the final GRANT payment or PROJECT termination, whichever is later. The Accounting and Audit Section, beginning on page 48, provides directions and an Audit Checklist for DPR audit and accounting requirements. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 34 of 217 7 Authorizing Resolution GRANTEE passes one resolution approving the filing of all APPLICATION PACKETS associated with the contract, and forwards a copy to OGALS. The Authorizing Resolution on the following page may be reformatted; however, the language provided in the resolution must remain unchanged. The Authorizing Resolution serves two purposes: 1.It is the means by which the GRANTEE’S Governing Body agrees to the terms of the contract; it provides confirmation that the GRANTEE has the funding to complete, operate and maintain PROJECTS associated with the contract. 2. Designates a position title to represent the Governing Body on all matters regarding PROJECTS associated with the contract. The incumbent in this position is referred to as the AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. Resolution items 4, 5, 7, 8 and 9 are required by Proposition 68. Complete the highlighted areas of the Authorizing Resolution (beginning on following page). The AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE can delegate signatory authority to other individuals (by position title) either in entirety or for particular documents. This may be included in item 11 of the resolution, or the AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE may submit a letter (on letterhead) or email to OGALS delegating authority. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 35 of 217 8 Resolution Form Resolution Number: (insert number here) RESOLUTION OF THE (Title of Governing Body/City Council, Board of Supervisors) OF (City, County, or District) APPROVING APPLICATION(S) FOR PER CAPITA GRANT FUNDS WHEREAS, the State Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the responsibility by the Legislature of the State of California for the administration of the Per Capita Grant Program, setting up necessary procedures governing application(s); and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the State Department of Parks and Recreation require the grantee’s Governing Body to certify by resolution the approval of project application(s) before submission of said applications to the State; and WHEREAS, the grantee will enter into a contract(s) with the State of California to complete project(s); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the (grantee’s governing body) hereby: 1.Approves the filing of project application(s) for Per Capita program grant project(s); and 2.Certifies that said grantee has or will have available, prior to commencement of project work utilizing Per Capita funding, sufficient funds to complete the project(s); and 3.Certifies that the grantee has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project(s), and 4.Certifies that all projects proposed will be consistent with the park and recreation element of the [city/county/district’s] general or recreation plan (PRC §80063(a)), and 5.Certifies that these funds will be used to supplement, not supplant, local revenues in existence as of June 5, 2018 (PRC §80062(d)), and 6.Certifies that it will comply with the provisions of §1771.5 of the State Labor Code, and 7.(PRC §80001(b)(8)(A-G)) To the extent practicable, as identified in the “Presidential Memorandum--Promoting Diversity and Inclusion in Our National Parks, National Forests, and Other Public Lands and Waters,” dated January 12, 2017, the [city/county/district] will consider a range of actions that include, but are not limited to, the following: (A)Conducting active outreach to diverse populations, particularly minority, low- income, and disabled populations and tribal communities, to increase awareness within those communities and the public generally about specific programs and opportunities. (B)Mentoring new environmental, outdoor recreation, and conservation leaders to increase diverse representation across these areas. (C)Creating new partnerships with state, local, tribal, private, and nonprofit organizations to expand access for diverse populations. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 36 of 217 9 (D)Identifying and implementing improvements to existing programs to increase visitation and access by diverse populations, particularly minority, low-income, and disabled populations and tribal communities. (E)Expanding the use of multilingual and culturally appropriate materials in public communications and educational strategies, including through social media strategies, as appropriate, that target diverse populations. (F)Developing or expanding coordinated efforts to promote youth engagement and empowerment, including fostering new partnerships with diversity-serving and youth-serving organizations, urban areas, and programs. (G)Identifying possible staff liaisons to diverse populations. 8.Agrees that to the extent practicable, the project(s) will provide workforce education and training, contractor and job opportunities for disadvantaged communities (PRC §80001(b)(5)). 9.Certifies that the grantee shall not reduce the amount of funding otherwise available to be spent on parks or other projects eligible for funds under this division in its jurisdiction. A one-time allocation of other funding that has been expended for parks or other projects, but which is not available on an ongoing basis, shall not be considered when calculating a recipient’s annual expenditures. (PRC §80062(d)). 10.Certifies that the grantee has reviewed, understands, and agrees to the General Provisions contained in the contract shown in the Procedural Guide; and 11.Delegates the authority to the (designated position, not name of person occupying position), or designee to conduct all negotiations, sign and submit all documents, including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, and payment requests, which may be necessary for the completion of the grant scope(s); and 12.Agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and guidelines. Approved and adopted the day of , 20 . I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Number was duly adopted by the (grantee’s governing body) following a roll call vote: Ayes: Noes: Absent: (Clerk) ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 37 of 217 10 Application Packet •GRANTEE may submit multiple APPLICATION PACKETS. •Separate APPLICATION PACKETS are required for each PROJECT site and/or PROJECT type. •Provide all APPLICATION PACKET items in the order shown in the following checklist. •Submitted documents need not contain original signatures; but the GRANTEE must keep all original signed documents. •GRANTEES are encouraged to submit documents digitally, as .pdf files. Do not send the APPLICATION PACKET as one file. E-mail each checklist item to the PROJECT OFFICER as a separate digital file, labeled using the digital file names indicated on the application checklist. •If submitting hard copies, number all pages of the APPLICATION PACKET. Any costs incurred prior to finalizing the contract are at the GRANTEE’S own risk. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 38 of 217 11 State of California – The Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Application Packet Checklist GRANTEES must complete the checklist below and submit it with the APPLICATION PACKET. An APPLICATION PACKET is not complete unless all items on the checklist are submitted. Each PROJECT requires its own APPLICATION PACKET. Check if included Check if not applicable Application Item Procedural Guide Page # Check when signed by AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Application Packet Page # Application Packet Checklist Digital file name: checklist.pdf Pg. 11 Pg. Application Digital file name: application.pdf Pg. 12 Pg. Development Project Scope/Cost Estimate, or Digital file name: devscope.pdf Pg. 19 Pg. Acquisition Requirements Digital file names: acqscope.pdf & acqdocs.pdf Pg. 14 Pg. Funding Sources Form Digital file name: fundingsources.pdf Pg. 20 Pg. Per Capita Match Calculator Digital file name: match.pdf Pg. 13 Pg. CEQA Compliance Certification Digital file name: ceqa.pdf Pg. 21 Pg. Land Tenure documentation Digital file names: ownership.pdf or nonownership.pdf Pg. 21 Pg. Sub-Leases or Agreements Digital file name: otheragreements.pdf Pg. 24 Pg. Site Plan Digital file name: siteplan.pdf Pg. 24 Pg. GHG Emissions Reduction Worksheet (at completion) Digital file name: emissions.pdf Pg. 24 Pg. Photos Digital file name: photos.pdf Pg. 24 Pg. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 39 of 217 12 State of California – The Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Per Capita Project Application Form PROJECT NAME REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT $ PROJECT SITE NAME and PHYSICAL ADDRESS where PROJECT is located including zip code (substitute latitude and longitude where no street address is available) MATCH AMOUNT (if project is not serving a severely disadvantaged community) $ LAND TENURE ( all that apply) Owned in fee simple by GRANTEE Available (or will be available) under a ( ) year lease or easement NEAREST CROSS STREET Project Type (Check one) Acquisition☐Development☐ COUNTY OF PROJECT LOCATION GRANTEE NAME AND MAILING ADDRESS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AS SHOWN IN RESOLUTION Name (typed or printed) and Title Email address Phone GRANT CONTACT-For administration of grant (if different from AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE) Name (typed or printed) and Title Email address Phone GRANT SCOPE: I represent and warrant that this APPLICATION PACKET describes the intended use of the requested GRANT to complete the items listed in the attached Development PROJECT Scope/Cost Estimate Form or acquisition documentation. I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California, that the information contained in this APPLICATION PACKET, including required attachments, is accurate. Signature of AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE as shown in Resolution Date Print Name: Title: ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 40 of 217 13 Per Capita Match PROJECTS that do not serve severely disadvantaged communities (median household income less than 60% of the statewide average) must include 20% match from the GRANTEE (PRC §80061(c)). Costs incurred to provide match must be eligible costs. Calculate match using the Per Capita match calculator at https://www.parksforcalifornia.org/percapita; submit the report with the APPLICATION PACKET. Costs incurred to provide match must be eligible costs. State funds are not allowed for match. Eligible match sources are: •Federal funds •Local funds •Private funds •IN-HOUSE EMPLOYEE SERVICES •Volunteer labor – must maintain time and attendance records showing actual hours worked (see https://independentsector.org for volunteer hourly wage value) Match and Eligible Costs The match is 20% but grantee must show 25% in additional costs if match is required. For example: Determining the match amount: PROJECT amount: $125,000 20% match: ($25,000) GRANT amount: $100,000 Submitting costs for reimbursement GRANT amount: $100,000 25% in additional costs: $25,000 PROJECT amount: $125,000 In summary, the 20% match calculation is based on the PROJECT amount, not on the GRANT amount. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 41 of 217 14 Acquisition Rules Acquisition Projects 1.Purchase price cannot exceed the appraised value, even if the GRANTEE is willing to pay the difference. 2.Land cannot be acquired through eminent domain. 3.Associated acquisition costs, such as appraisals, escrow fees, title insurance, etc., combined must be less than 25% of the PROJECT costs. 4.A deed restriction must be recorded on the property after the acquisition is complete (see page 29). 5.Land must be open to the public for recreational purposes within three years from the date the final payment is issued by the State Controller’s Office (SCO).2 6.GRANTEE must provide Title Insurance. 7.PROJECTS must be consistent with the park and recreation element of the [city/county/district’s] general or recreation plan (PRC §80063(b)). 8.Per Capita funds must be used to supplement, not supplant, local revenues in existence as of June 5, 2018 (PRC §80062(d)). Acquisition Grant Scope/Cost Estimate Provide the following information on a document signed by the AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE: •A brief description, for example, “Acquisition of approximately (enter total acreage to be acquired) for the development of park by (enter date no later than three years from the date final payment is issued by the SCO).” •Estimated total costs for land and relocation •Estimated total costs other than the purchase price and relocation costs, such as appraisals, escrow fees, title insurance fees, deed restriction recordation costs Acquisition Documentation For each parcel to be acquired, submit these documents: 1.An appraisal conducted within the last twelve months 2.A separate letter from an independent third party, AG rated appraiser certified by the California Office of Real Estate Appraisers stating the appraisal was reviewed, and was completed using acceptable methods 3.County Assessor’s parcel map, showing parcel number and parcel to be acquired 4.Estimated value of each parcel to be acquired with a description of how that value was determined (such as the listed price on MLS, in-house estimation, website evaluation, assessed value) 5.Acreage of each parcel to be acquired 6.A description of any encumbrances that will remain on the property, such as grazing, timber, mineral rights or easements 2 Grantees will see this date on their project complete letter – “A final payment was issued by the SCO on xx/xx/20xx” ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 42 of 217 15 7.A brief description of the intended recreational use of the land with the estimated date by which the site will be open to the public for recreational purposes For easement acquisitions, in addition to the requirements above, provide: 8.A copy of the proposed easement guaranteeing the authority to use the property for the purposes specified in the application. For relocation costs, in addition to the requirements above, provide: 9.A letter signed by the AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, listing the relocation costs for each displaced tenant, certifying that the relocation amount does not exceed the maximum allowed pursuant to Government Code §7260-7277. Eligible Acquisition Costs •IN-HOUSE EMPLOYEE SERVICES – see accounting rules (page 48) •GRANT/PROJECT administration and accounting •Public meetings/focus groups/design workshop •Appraisals, escrow fees, surveying, other costs associated with acquisition •Cost of land Ineligible Acquisition Costs – Cannot be charged to the grant •Costs to fulfill any mitigation requirements imposed by law (PRC §80020) •Acquisitions where purchase price is greater than appraised value •Costs for land acquired through eminent domain or condemnation •Costs incurred outside the GRANT performance period •Development costs ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 43 of 217 16 Development Project Rules Development Projects 1.PROJECTS must be consistent with the park and recreation element of the GRANTEE’S general or recreation plan (PRC §80063(b)). 2.Per Capita funds must be used to supplement, not supplant, local revenues in existence as of June 5, 2018 (PRC §80062(d)). 3.Contracted work must comply with the provisions of §1771.5 of the State Labor Code. 4.GRANTEE must have adequate liability insurance, performance bond, or other security necessary to protect the State and GRANTEE’S interest against poor workmanship, fraud, or other potential loss associated with the completion of the PROJECT. 5.PRE-CONSTRUCTION COSTS may not exceed 25% of the PROJECT amount. 6.The primary purpose of any building constructed or improved must be public recreation. For example, renovating a gymnasium that includes office space for staff is eligible; renovating GRANTEE’S office building is not. 7.PROJECTS must be accessible, including an accessible path of travel to the PROJECT. Eligible Development Costs All costs must be incurred within the GRANT PERFORMANCE PERIOD. Costs listed below are examples of eligible costs, and not inclusive. Contact OGALS if you have any questions regarding a PROJECT cost. Eligible Pre-construction Costs – up to 25% of PROJECT costs; incurred prior to groundbreaking as determined by the GRANTEE •Public meetings, focus groups, design workshops •Plans, specifications, construction documents, and cost estimates •Permits •CEQA •Bid preparation and packages •IN-HOUSE EMPLOYEE SERVICES prior to groundbreaking •GRANT/PROJECT administration and accounting prior to groundbreaking Eligible Construction Costs – up to 100% of the PROJECT costs; incurred after groundbreaking. •Construction – necessary labor and construction activities to complete the PROJECT, including site preparation (demolition, clearing and grubbing, excavation, grading), onsite implementation and construction supervision •Equipment – Equipment use charges (rental and in-house) must be made in accordance with GRANTEE ’S normal accounting practices. •Bond and other signs •Premiums on hazard and liability insurance to cover personnel or property •Site preparation •Purchase and installation of equipment: security cameras, lighting, signs, display boards, sound systems, video equipment, etc. •Construction management: including site inspections and PROJECT administration ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 44 of 217 17 Distinguishing capital outlay (eligible) from maintenance and repair (not eligible): •Capital outlay – building something new, or for existing structures, activities intended to boost the condition beyond its original or current state. •Repairs – activities performed to a section of a structure that are intended to allow the continued use. •Maintenance – activities intended to be performed on a regular basis to maintain the expected useful life of a structure. Examples: Roof – replacing broken shingles is maintenance; fixing a hole is repair; replacing the roof is capital outlay. Playground – adding additional fall material is maintenance; fixing the chains on a swing set is repair; replacing the play structures is capital outlay. Windows – repairing the glazing is maintenance; replacing broken panes is repair; replacing the windows is capital outlay. •Miscellaneous: other costs incurred during the construction phase, such as transporting materials, equipment, or personnel, and communications •IN-HOUSE EMPLOYEE SERVICES after groundbreaking •GRANT/PROJECT administration and accounting after groundbreaking Ineligible Development Costs – Cannot be charged to the grant •PRE-CONSTRUCTION COSTS that exceed 25% of the PROJECT costs •Development to fulfill any mitigation requirements imposed by law (PRC §80020) •All non-capital costs, including interpretive and recreational programming, software and software development •Construction or improvements to facilities that are not primarily designated for recreational purposes, such as park district offices •Construction outside the boundaries of the recreation facility •Furniture or equipment not site specific and not necessary for the core function of a new facility (non-capital outlay) •Costs incurred before or after the GRANT PERFORMANCE PERIOD •Indirect costs – overhead business expenses of the GRANTEE’S fixed or ordinary operating costs (rent, mortgage payments, property taxes, utilities, etc.) •Food and beverages •Out-of-state travel •Fundraising and grant writing •Repairs – activities performed to a section of a structure that are intended to allow the continued use. •Maintenance – activities intended to be performed on a regular basis to maintain the expected useful life of a structure. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 45 of 217 18 Accounting Rules for In-House Employee Services GRANTEES must follow these accounting practices for services performed by its employees to be eligible for reimbursement: •Maintain time and attendance records as charges are incurred, identifying the employee through a name or other tracking system, and that employee’s actual time spent on the PROJECT. •Time estimates, including percentages, for work performed on the PROJECT are not acceptable. •Time sheets that do not identify the specific employee’s time spent on the PROJECT are not acceptable. •Costs of the salaries and wages must be calculated according to the GRANTEE’S wage and salary scales, and may include benefit costs such as vacation, health insurance, pension contributions and workers’ compensation. •Overtime costs may be allowed under the GRANTEE’S established policy, provided that the regular work time was devoted to the same PROJECT. •May not include overhead or cost allocation. These are the costs generally associated with supporting an employee, such as rent, personnel support, IT, utilities, etc. •If planning to claim IN -HOUSE EMPLOYEE SERVICES costs, provide a sample timesheet for OGALS review to confirm these accounting practices are being followed. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 46 of 217 19 State of California – The Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Development Project Scope/Cost Estimate Form GRANTEE: PROJECT Name Install new Renovate existing Replace existing Recreation Element Pool, aquatic center, splash pad Trails or walking paths Landscaping or irrigation Group picnic, outdoor classrooms, other gathering spaces Play equipment, outdoor fitness equipment Sports fields, sports courts, court lighting Community center, gym, other indoor facilities Restroom, concession stand Other: Other: Minor elements which support one or more of the recreation elements checked above: benches, lighting, parking, signage, etc. PRE-CONSTRUCTION (costs incurred prior to ground-breaking, such as design, permits, bid packages, CEQA); up to 25% of total PROJECT cost. $ Construction $ Total PROJECT cost $ Subtract GRANTEE match if not in severely disadvantaged community (20% of total PROJECT cost, see page 13) Less match -$ Total GRANT amount requested $ The GRANTEE understands that all elements listed on this form must be complete and open to the public before the final grant payment will be made. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Signature Date Print Name and Title Development project scope (Describe the project in 30 words or less): Project Scope Items -  all that apply: ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 47 of 217 20 State of California – The Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Funding Sources Form GRANTEE: PROJECT Name PROJECTS funded by the program are not complete until the PROJECT SCOPE is complete, and the PROJECT is open to the public. PROJECTS will: •Be entirely funded by the GRANT, or •Require funds in excess of the GRANT. If the PROJECT requires funds in excess of the GRANT, the SCOPE of the PROJECT may be either the SCOPE of the larger project, or a subset of the larger project. For example, if the PROJECT is $100,000 towards construction of a $500,000 park, the SCOPE can be the $500,000 park, or a $100,000 element of the park, such as a playground, that can be complete and open to the public. ☐The PROJECT will be entirely funded by the GRANT, or ☐The PROJECT requires funds in excess of the GRANT: ☐The SCOPE is the same as the scope of the larger project, or ☐The SCOPE is a subset of a larger project, the scope of that larger project is: Larger project cost: $ Anticipated completion date: List all funds that will be used. Submit revised Funding Sources form should funding sources be added or modified. Funding Source Date Committed Amount Per Capita/State of California July 1, 2018 $ $ $ I represent and warrant that I have full authority to execute this Funding Sources Form on behalf of the GRANTEE. I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California, that this status report, and any accompanying documents, for the above- mentioned GRANT is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Signature Date Print Name and Title ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 48 of 217 21 State of California – The Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CEQA Compliance Certification GRANTEE: Project Name: Project Address: Is CEQA complete? Yes No Is completing CEQA a PROJECT SCOPE item? Yes No What document was filed, or is expected to be filed for this project’s CEQA analysis: Date complete/expected to be completed Notice of Exemption (attach recorded copy if filed) Notice of Determination (attach recorded copy if filed) Other: If CEQA is complete, and a Notice of Exemption or Notice of Determination was not filed, attach a letter from the Lead Agency explaining why, certifying the project has complied with CEQA and noting the date that the project was approved by the Lead Agency. Lead Agency Contact Information Agency Name: Contact Person: Mailing Address: Phone: ( ) Email: Certification: I hereby certify that the above referenced Lead Agency has complied or will comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and that the project is described in adequate and sufficient detail to allow the project’s construction or acquisition. I further certify that the CEQA analysis for this project encompasses all aspects of the work to be completed with grant funds. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Signature Date Print Name and Title FOR OGALS USE ONLY CEQA Document Date Received PO Initials  NOE NOD ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 49 of 217 22 Land Tenure The purpose of the land tenure requirement is to verify that the GRANTEE has sufficient legal rights to the property to fulfill the terms of the contract. •PROJECT amounts up to $100,000 require at least 20 years of land tenure at the site to be acquired or developed. •PROJECT amounts greater than $100,000 require at least 30 years of land tenure at the site to be acquired or developed. •The 20- or 30-year land tenure requirement begins on July 1, 2018. •The GRANTEE remains responsible for fulfillment of the terms of the contract, even if the GRANTEE’S land tenure agreement changes within the contract PERFORMANCE PERIOD. Land Tenure Ownership Documentation If the GRANTEE owns the PROJECT site in fee simple, provide one of the following: •Deed or deed recordation number, or •Title report, or •Tract map or assessor’s map with owner’s name Land Tenure Non-Ownership Documentation If the GRANTEE does not own the PROJECT site in fee simple, provide: •Land Tenure Agreement Checklist (page 22) •Signed land tenure agreement If the grantee does not own the project site in fee simple, and the existing land tenure agreement does not meet the requirements in the Land Tenure Checklist, provide •Land Tenure Agreement Checklist (page 22) •Signed land tenure agreement •An explanation as to how the existing land tenure agreement adequately protects the State’s interest. OGALS will review and determine if the land tenure is sufficient. Land Tenure Agreement Checklist If the GRANTEE does not own the land in fee simple, complete this checklist. Attach a copy of the signed land tenure agreement. Identify the page numbers where the required items can be found in the land tenure agreement and highlight the provisions in the agreement where the information is located. All items are required. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 50 of 217 23 Land Tenure Checklist GRANTEE: PROJECT Name  Page Required Item □ Type of agreement: For example: lease, joint powers agreement, easement, memorandum of understanding, etc. □ Parties to the agreement (land owner must be public agency or utility) and date signed: Party Date Signed □ Term of the agreement: years □ Agreement end date: •Grant amounts up to $100,000 require at least 20 years of land tenure. •Grant amounts above $100,000 require at least 30 years of land tenure. •The land tenure requirement begins on July 1, 2018. □ Renewal option: Must include an option, which can be non-binding, for the GRANTEE to renew the agreement beyond the original 20 or 30 year term. □ Termination clause: Any of the following is acceptable: •No termination clause – the agreement is non-revocable. •Termination clause specifies the agreement is revocable only for cause. •The termination clause cannot allow the land owner to revoke the agreement without cause, i.e., at will. □ Site Control, Roles and Responsibilities should the GRANT be awarded, the agreement: •Authorizes the GRANTEE to proceed with the construction PROJECT. The GRANTEE may delegate construction to other entities. •Establishes when the general public can use the PROJECT and gives GRANTEE permission to operate the PROJECT site (such as scheduling recreational programs). The GRANTEE may delegate operational roles to other entities but is bound through the contract provisions to ensure full public access for the duration of the land tenure period. •Identifies which entity will maintain the PROJECT site. The GRANTEE may delegate maintenance to other entities but is bound through the contract provisions to ensure maintenance of the PROJECT site for the duration of the land tenure period. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 51 of 217 24 Site Plan Provide a drawing showing where all the items listed in the project scope/Cost Estimate Form will be located. To ensure that any building use meets the requirements of the program, include the function and approximate square footage of each room within buildings that are part of the scope, and the approximate total square footage of the buildings. It does not need to be a detailed engineering rendering. Sub-leases or Agreements Provide a list of all other leases, agreements, memoranda of understanding, etc., affecting PROJECT property or its operation and maintenance. Photos Provide photos that will establish a “before” comparison for the site to be improved. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction and Carbon Sequestration.3 If your PROJECT involves tree planting, follow the instructions below and submit with the PROJECT COMPLETION PACKET. Before getting started, gather the following PROJECT information: •Tree species •Size of trees at planting •Information on the distance and direction to the nearest building (if applicable) •Information on the age and climate control of any nearby buildings (if applicable) •Information about the tree’s growing conditions Getting started: 1.Navigate to the i-Tree site at https://planting.itreetools.org and select the tab for a new project. 2.On the Location map, select your state, county and city, and then click Next. 3.Configure the project parameters4: •“Electricity emissions factor” enter 285 and select kilograms •“Fuel emissions factor” enter 53.1 and select kilograms •“Years for the project” is the age of the trees 40 years from when they are planted. So, if the trees will be four years old at the time of planting, enter 44. •“Tree mortality” enter 0 4.Tree Planting Configurations •Enter the tree groups for the project; create a new group for each new species or for each new location. •Species – select the species; add multiple species by creating new groups. 3 PRC §80001(b)(7) 4 Project parameters are from the California Air Resources Board’s “Quantification Methodology for the California Natural Resources Agency Urban Greening Grant Program.” ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 52 of 217 25 •DBH – tree diameter four feet above the ground at time of planting. •Distance to nearest tree – select from drop down menu •Tree is (north, south, east or west) of Building – select the direction the tree is located to the nearest climate-controlled building. •Climate controls – select the type of climate controls the nearby building has installed. If a tree is more than 60 feet away from a climate-controlled building, select “none.” •Condition – select the overall health of the trees at the time of planting. •Exposure to sunlight – select the amount of sun that reaches the tree, based on its surroundings. •Number of trees – enter the number of trees that are the same species and the same characteristics (e.g. distance to building, location in respect to building, exposure to sunlight, etc.) If some of these characteristics change, multiple lines of the same species should be input into the tool. Once all the groups are entered, click next 5.Print the report in landscape mode, and submit it to OGALS. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 53 of 217 26 Special Requirements •Status Reports (page 26) •Bond Act Sign (page 28) •Deed Restriction (page 29) Status Report OGALS will send a Status Report every six months until receipt of a PROJECT COMPLETION PACKET. Payment requests will not be processed if Status Reports are overdue. See sample on following page. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 54 of 217 27 Sample Status Report – Due xx/xx/20xx (30 days from mail date) Grantee: Project Number: Project Name: Project Scope: Project Phase: □ Pre-Construction/Pre-Acquisition □ Acquisition and/or Construction When will you submit your next payment request? For ho w much? Estimated date of project completion: Potential obstacles affecting completion: Is the project: On Time? yes/no Within Budget? yes/no Within Scope? yes/no If no, explain: Describe grant-funded work completed since last status report submitted on (DATE): Are CCC or certified local corps working on this project? Yes/No Provide photos showing work completed since (DATE) Describe grant-funded work expected to be completed by (MailDate + 6 mos) If there have been any changes to the proposed funding for this project, attach a revised Funding Sources Form. Provide information on payments to be submitted over the next three years: Between 7/1/20 and 6/30/21 Between 7/1/21 and 12/31/21 Between 1/1/22 and 6/30/22 Between 7/1/22 and 12/30/22 Between 1/1/23 and 6/30/23 Between 7/1/23 and 12/30/23 After 1/1/24 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ The purpose of this data is to help the State estimate borrowing needs; you will not be held to these estimates. I represent and warrant that I have full authority to execute this Grant Progress Status Report on behalf of the Grantee. I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California, that this status report, and any accompanying documents, for the above-mentioned Grant is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Signature Date Print Name and Title (*Certification to above information requires a signature by a person authorized in the resolution) ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 55 of 217 28 Bond Act Sign A sign acknowledging the California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access for All Act of 2018 as the funding source for the project must be installed during construction and at completion (PRC §80001(b)(3)). If appropriate, the same sign can be used during construction and completion. Sign requirements The sign must be available during construction, at the final inspection of the PROJECT, and remain in place for a minimum of four (4) years from date of PROJECT completion. There is no minimum or maximum size other than the minimum size for the logo, as long as the sign contains the required wording. Sign Language All signs must contain the following language: GAVIN NEWSOM, GOVERNOR Wade Crowfoot, Secretary for Natural Resources Armando Quintero, Director, California Department of Parks and Recreation Use the names of the current officials. The name of the director of the local agency or other governing body may be added. The sign may also include names (and/or logos) of other partners, organizations, individuals and elected representatives. Logo All signs must display the Parks and Water Bond Act logo (shown on the cover of this guide). Display the logo to maximize visibility and durability. Download the logo at http://resources.ca.gov/grants/logo-art/. The logo must measure a minimum of 24″ tall. Exceptions may be approved, when appropriate, at OGALS’ discretion. Sign Construction All materials used shall be durable and resistant to the elements and graffiti. Sign Cost The cost of the sign(s) is an eligible PROJECT cost. Permanent signage is encouraged. Appropriateness of Signs For projects where the required sign may be out of place or affected by local sign ordinances, OGALS may authorize a sign that is more appropriate to the project. State Approval GRANTEE shall submit the proposed number, locations, size, and language of signs for preliminary review. Final payments will not be processed until post completion signage has been approved and installed. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 56 of 217 29 Deed Restriction The Deed Restriction restricts the title to the property, safeguarding the property for purposes consistent with the GRANT for the duration of the CONTRACT PERFORMANCE PERIOD. If the GRANTEE owns the PROJECT land, a Deed Restriction must be recorded on the title to the property before OGALS will approve any grant payments. If the GRANTEE is acquiring land, a deed restriction is required before the PROJECT is complete. A Deed Restriction is not required if the GRANTEE does not own the PROJECT land, such as where the GRANTEE is improving property it has access to under a lease agreement. Deed Restriction Instructions 1.The GRANTEE must own the PROJECT land and have an encumbered contract for the GRANT amount. 2.The PROJECT OFFICER will send the Deed Restriction to the GRANTEE. Do not alter the Deed Restriction. The GRANTEE takes the following steps: 1.Add ownership information to Paragraph I of the Deed Restriction: [formal name of GRANTEE] Insert ownership information as it appears on the deed. 2.Create 3 copies (GRANTEE copy, OGALS copy and recorder’s copy) of the Deed restriction and the required attachments: (1)Exhibit A: Label this attachment “Exhibit A (Legal Description of Property).” Include a formal legal description of every parcel of property to which grant funds will be used for the development and/or acquisition thereof. This information can be obtained from the grant deed or title policy. (The assessor’s parcel number or a street address is NOT a valid legal description.) and, (2)Exhibit B: Label this attachment “Exhibit B (Grant Contract)” and include a complete copy of the Grant Contract and provisions signed by the AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE and the State of California. 3.Notarize it: Take the following documents to a notary. OGALS recommends submitting these documents to the OGALS PROJECT OFFICER for review prior to notarizing. •Unsigned and undated Deed Restriction •Exhibit A (Legal Description of Property) •Exhibit B (Grant Contract) The AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE dates and signs the Deed Restriction signature page in the presence of a notary. The notary will complete a Notary Acknowledgement (Civil Code §1189). 4.Record it: Take the notarized documents bulleted above to the County Recorder’s Office of the county in which the property is located. Ask the County Clerk to record the Deed Restriction with Notary Acknowledgement, Exhibit A, and Exhibit B, on the title to the property. 5.Send it: Send a copy of the notarized and recorded documents bulleted above to the OGALS PROJECT OFFICER. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 57 of 217 30 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: California Department of Parks and Recreation Office of Grants and Local Services WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Office of Grants and Local Services PO Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 Attn: [Project Officer] DEED RESTRICTION I.WHEREAS, insert ownership information as it appears on the deed (hereinafter referred to as “Owner(s)” is/are recorded owner(s) of the real property described in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated herein by reference (hereinafter referred to as the “Property”); and II.WHEREAS, the California Department of Parks and Recreation (hereinafter referred to as “DPR”) is a public agency created and existing under the authority of section 5001 of the California Public Resources Code (hereinafter referred to as the “PRC”). And III.WHEREAS, Owner(s) (or Grantee) received an allocation of grant funds pursuant to the California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access For All Act of 2018 Per Capita Program for improvements on the Property; and IV.WHEREAS, on (enter date), DPR’s Office of Grants and Local Services conditionally approved Grant [project number], (hereinafter referred to as “Grant”) for improvements on the Property, subject to, among other conditions, recordation of this Deed Restriction on the Property; and V.WHEREAS, but for the imposition of the Deed Restriction condition of the Grant, the Grant would not be consistent with the public purposes of the Per Capita Program and the funds that are the subject of the Grant could therefore not have been allocated; and ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 58 of 217 31 VI.WHEREAS, Owner(s) has/have elected to comply with the Deed Restriction requirement of the Grant, so as to enable Owner(s), to receive the Grant funds and perform the work described in the Grant; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the issuance of the Grant funds by DPR, the undersigned Owner(s) for himself/herself/themselves and for his/her/their heirs, assigns, and successors-in-interest, hereby irrevocably covenant(s) with DPR that the condition of the grant (set forth at paragraph(s) 1 through 5 and in Exhibit B hereto) shall at all times on and after the date on which this Deed Restriction is recorded constitute for all purposes covenants, conditions and restrictions on the use and enjoyment of the Property that are hereby attached to the deed to the Property as fully effective components thereof. 1.DURATION. This Deed Restriction shall remain in full force and effect and shall bind Owner(s) and all his/her/their assigns or successors-in-interest for the period running from July 1, 20xx to June 30, 20xx (20 years) or June 30, 20xx (30 years). 2.TAXES AND ASSESMENTS. It is intended that this Deed Restriction is irrevocable and shall constitute an enforceable restriction within the meaning of a) Article XIII, section 8, of the California Constitution; and b) section 402.1 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code or successor statue. Furthermore, this Deed Restriction shall be deemed to constitute a servitude upon and burden to the Property within the meaning of section 3712(d) of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, or successor statue, which survives a sale of tax-deeded property. 3.RIGHT OF ENTRY. DPR or its agent or employees may enter onto the Property at times reasonably acceptable to Owner(s) to ascertain whether the use restrictions set forth above are being observed. 4.REMEDIES. Any act, conveyance, contract, or authorization by Owner(s) whether written or oral which uses or would cause to be used or would permit use of the Property contrary to the terms of this Deed Restriction will be deemed a violation and a breach hereof. DPR may pursue any and all available legal and/or equitable remedies to enforce the terms and conditions of this Deed Restriction up to and including a lien sale of the property. In the event of a breach, any forbearance on the part of DPR to ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 59 of 217 32 enforce the terms and provisions hereof shall not be deemed a waiver of enforcement rights regarding such breach, or any subsequent breach. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of these restrictions is held to be invalid, or for any reason becomes unenforceable, no other provision shall be affected or impaired. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Signature Date Print Name and Title Business Name (if property is owned by a business): Additional signature, if required Date Print Name and Title ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 60 of 217 33 Grant Payments Payments may be requested after a PROJECT is approved and the contract is encumbered. Payment requests are processed through the State Controller’s Office and mailed to the GRANTEE approximately six to eight weeks from the date OGALS approves the request. Payment Rules 1.A Grant Expenditure Form (see page 35) is required with all reimbursement and final payment requests. 2.Payment requests prior to groundbreaking are limited to 25% of the PROJECT amount. 3.Payments before the final payment may not exceed 80% of the PROJECT amount. 20% of the PROJECT amount is retained for the final reimbursement. 4.A deed restriction is required prior to processing any reimbursement payments except an acquisition ADVANCE. 5.Group costs together to avoid frequent payment requests. Reimbursement requests greater than $10,000 are encouraged. 6. For PROJECTS where match is required, GRANTEES must show eligible costs equal to 125% of the requested reimbursement amount (see page 13). 7. Complete CEQA prior to requesting any construction reimbursement. 8.Provide a sample timesheet to the PROJECT OFFICER prior to incurring any IN-HOUSE EMPLOYEE SERVICES costs, and if claiming IN-HOUSE EMPLOYEE SERVICES costs, provide a sample timesheet with each reimbursement payment request. 9.Provide a summary list of bidders, recommendation by reviewer of bidders, awarding by governing body and contract agreement to the PROJECT OFFICER prior to requesting reimbursement for costs on contracts requiring a bid process. 10. Provide construction progress photos, including a photo with the construction sign visible on the PROJECT site (see page 28), with all construction payment requests. 11. OGALS may withhold payment if the GRANTEE has outstanding issues, such as: •breach of any other contract with OGALS •an unresolved audit exception •an outstanding conversion •park sites closed or inadequately maintained •overdue Project Status Reports •other unmet grant requirements ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 61 of 217 34 Payment Request Form Instructions •All payment request types (reimbursement, final, ADVANCE) require this form. •Payment requests may be submitted by e-mail to the PROJECT OFFICER. •Round all amounts to the nearest whole dollar. •A Grant Expenditure Form (see page 35) is required with all reimbursement and final payment requests. •Complete the Payment Request Form as follows: 1.PROJECT Number - Number assigned by OGALS when this PROJECT was approved. 2.Contract Number - As shown in Certification of Funding section of the contract 3.APPLICANT - GRANTEE name as shown on the contract 4.PROJECT Title - Name of the PROJECT as shown in the Application 5.Type of Payment – check appropriate box on form 6.Payment Information – always round to the nearest dollar. 7.Send Warrant To - AGENCY name, address and contact person 8.Signature of AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE according to the Resolution ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 62 of 217 35 Payment Request Form ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 63 of 217 36 Grant Expenditure Form All payment requests require a summary of costs incurred. An electronic version of the grant expenditure form is available at www.parks.ca.gov/grants. GRANTEES may use their own spreadsheet if it contains the required information shown below. Keep copies of invoices or warrants with the PROJECT records, available to OGALS on request. Only provide the following information to OGALS: PROJECT Number: Warrant/ Check #(1) Date(2) Recipient(3) Purpose(4) Pre-Construction Amount(5) Construction Amount(6) PRE-CONSTRUCTION Subtotal (5) $ Construction Subtotal (6) $ Grand Total (5) + (6) $ List only ELIGIBLE COSTS charged to the GRANT. Column (1) Electronic payment numbers/electronic funds transfer numbers in the “Warrant/Check Number” column are acceptable. Include an “EP” next to the electronic payment numbers/electronic funds transfer numbers. If IN-HOUSE EMPLOYEE SERVICES or GRANTEE’S own equipment was used, a work order or other tracking number can be used instead of a check/warrant number. Column (2) Date payment was made to recipient. If IN-HOUSE EMPLOYEE SERVICES were used, provide the date range with a summary of actual hours worked, and a sample timesheet. Column (3) Name of Contractor, IN-HOUSE EMPLOYEE SERVICES, or other entity providing services and/or materials. Column (4) SCOPE item related to the expenditure and a brief description, such as “playground design,” “community center permits,” “walkway materials,” “sports field construction.” Column (5) PRE-CONSTRUCTION costs eligible for up to 25% of the GRANT. Column (6) DEVELOPMENT costs eligible for up to 100% of GRANT. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 64 of 217 37 Project Completion Packet PROJECT COMPLETION PACKETS must be submitted by March 31st of the year the contract expires. GRANTEES are encouraged to submit documents digitally, as .pdf files. E-mail the documents to the PROJECT OFFICER as separate digital files, labeled as the document item. GRANTEES should follow up with PROJECT OFFICER to confirm documents were received. The final payment (not less than 20% of the PROJECT amount) will be processed after PROJECT COMPLETION and the following occurs: 1.Approval of the PROJECT COMPLETION PACKET (page 37). 2.Site inspection by the PROJECT OFFICER to verify PROJECT COMPLETION. To request the final payment and complete the PROJECT, the GRANTEE must submit the following documents: 1.Payment Request Form (page 35) 2.Grant Expenditure Form (page 35) 3.Final Funding Sources Form (page 20) 4.GHG Emissions Reduction Worksheet (page 24) 5.PROJECT COMPLETION Certification Form (page 38) 6.Photo of the bond act sign and location (page 28) 7.Recorded Deed Restriction, if not already provided (page 29) 8.Completed CEQA, if not already provided (page 21) 9.Notice of Completion (optional)5 10.Audit checklist with items checked that GRANTEE will retain for five years following receipt of final payment (page 50) For acquisition PROJECTS, the GRANTEE must submit these additional documents: 1.A copy of the recorded deed to the property 2.A map sufficient to verify the description of the property including parcel numbers and acreage 3.Copy of title insurance policy 4.Copy of title report 5 OGALS recommends that the GRANTEE file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder pursuant to State of California Civil Code §3093. Filing the Notice of Completion is not a PROJECT COMPLETION requirement. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 65 of 217 38 State of California – The Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Project Completion Certification Form Grantee: Project Number: Grantee contact for audit purposes Name: Address: Phone: ( ) Email: Project completion – list the grant scope items: Provide revised Funding Sources Form Interest earned on advanced funds: $ Interest spent on eligible costs: $ Was a Notice of Completion filed with the County Recorder or other appropriate entity? Yes / No Certification: I hereby certify that all Grant funds were expended on the above-named Project and that the Project is complete and we have made final payment for all work done. I have read California Penal Code §118 and understand that every person who testifies, declares, deposes, or certifies under penalty of perjury and willfully states as true any material matter which he or she knows to be false, is guilty of perjury, which is a felony punishable by imprisonment in state prison for two, three, or four years. Furthermore, I have read California Penal Code §72 and understand that every person who, with the intent to defraud, presents for allowance or for payment to any state board or officer, or to any county, city, or District board or officer, authorized to allow or pay the same if genuine, any false or fraudulent claim, bill, account, voucher, or writing, is guilty of a felony-misdemeanor punishable either by imprisonment in county jail for a period of not more than one year, by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, or both, or by imprisonment in state prison, by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars, or both. I represent and warrant that I have full authority to execute this Project Completion Certification on behalf of the Grantee. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing certification of Project Completion for the above-mentioned Grant is true and correct. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Signature Date Print Name and Title ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 66 of 217 39 Advance Payments •OGALS reserves the right to disapprove ADVANCE payment requests. •Past performance, GRANTEE capacity, and the GRANTEE’S financial resources will all be considered before issuing an ADVANCE. •GRANTEES that are unable to finance a considerable portion of their PROJECTS are encouraged to seek an allocation transfer (page 54). •ADVANCE payments may be requested for costs the GRANTEE will incur within the next six months. •ADVANCE funds must be placed in an interest-bearing account. Any interest earned on those funds must be spent within six months of receipt. •The sum of DEVELOPMENT ADVANCES cannot exceed 50% of the PROJECT amount. Pre-Construction Advance Payment Type Maximum Request When to Request Documents to Send to PROJECT OFFICER Costs to be incurred in next six months Preconstruction estimate shown on Development Project SCOPE/Cost Estimate Form After the contract has been encumbered •Payment Request Form •ADVANCE justification (see below) •Sample timesheet if funds will be spent on IN-HOUSE EMPLOYEE SERVICES Construction Advance Payment Type Maximum Request When to Request Documents to Send to PROJECT OFFICER Costs to be incurred in next six months No more than 50% of the grant amount. After the contract has been encumbered, and construction will commence during the next six months •Payment Request Form •ADVANCE justification (see below) •Bid documents (see page 33, number 9) •Copy of signed contract and a notice to proceed or IN-HOUSE EMPLOYEE SERVICES schedule •Filed NOD or NOE (page Error! Bookmark not defined.) •Sample timesheet if funds will be spent on IN-HOUSE EMPLOYEE SERVICES Advance Justification Provide the following information: •Explanation as to why an ADVANCE is needed instead of a reimbursement. Describe any hardships the GRANTEE will experience if a reimbursement were issued instead of an ADVANCE. •A payment schedule, with a month-by-month estimate, for up to six months, showing the anticipated amount needed, and to whom the funds will be paid (IN-HOUSE EMPLOYEE SERVICES or name of contractor). The six-month period should begin six to eight weeks after payment request is submitted. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 67 of 217 40 •A funding plan, indicating how the GRANTEE intends to provide cash flow to the percentage of the PROJECT exceeding the 50% ADVANCE limit. •A statement indicating the GRANTEE will put the advanced funds into a separate, interest bearing account, and spend any interest earned on the PROJECT. •An acknowledgement that all invoices and contracts pursuant to which payments are made shall be made available to OGALS on demand. Clearing the Advance ADVANCES must be cleared with six months of receipt, or earlier. ADVANCES should be cleared incrementally, that is, as costs are incurred. An ADVANCE is cleared as follows: •Submit a grant expenditure form (see page 35) documenting expenditures of eligible costs equal to the ADVANCE amount plus any earned interest (or 125% of the ADVANCE amount if match is required). •Submit photos of construction completed and the construction sign (see page 28) with the ADVANCE funds (for construction ADVANCES). •Return the balance of unspent GRANT funds to OGALS no later than thirty days after the end of the six-month ADVANCE period. •OGALS will then return the GRANT funds to the contract balance. OGALS cannot return interest to the contract balance. Subsequent Payments ADVANCE payments must be cleared before any payments will be approved. This requirement may be waived in cases where a PROJECT requires timely payments to contractors, and the remaining balance of unspent ADVANCED funds cannot cover the next PROJECT payment. The following are required to request a waiver: 1.A letter to the PROJECT OFFICER, signed by the AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, explaining why the waiver is needed. 2.A statement in the letter that the majority of ADVANCED funds has been cleared. 3.A payment schedule with month by month estimates detailing the anticipated amount needed including the unspent balance of previously ADVANCED funds, along with the additional requested reimbursement or ADVANCE. Acquisition Advance into Escrow Payment Type When to Request Documents to Send ADVANCES up to 100% of the GRANT and MATCH amounts After the contract is encumbered and escrow is open See following instructions 1.Escrow letter 2.Title report cover page 3.Payment request form The following items are required to request an ADVANCE payment into escrow: 1.A letter on the GRANTEE’s letterhead, addressing all of the following elements, and signed by the GRANTEE’s AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE: ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 68 of 217 41 a)Name, address and telephone number of the title company or escrow holder, and the escrow account number to which the GRANT funds will be disbursed. b)Copy of the property appraisal and written concurrence (page 14). c)GRANT contract number and amount of GRANT funds requested. d)A statement by the GRANTEE that “the preliminary title report shows that there are no liens, easements, or any other restrictions that would prevent completion of the PROJECT SCOPE and fulfillment of the contract provisions.” e)A statement by the GRANTEE that “all funds (exclusive of the GRANT funds to be provided under this agreement) needed for the completion of the acquisition of the property or properties have been secured and have been or will be deposited to escrow on or about the same date as the requested GRANT funds.” In making this statement, the GRANTEE is entitled to reasonably rely on the representations of the seller. 2.Cover page of the preliminary title report. 3.Payment Request Form. The “Send Warrant To” item 7 on the Payment Request Form must be completed using the title company’s or escrow holder’s name, mailing address, and contact person (see page 35). After approval by OGALS, the payment will be mailed by the State Controller’s Office to the designated escrow company within approximately 30 working days. Returning Unexpended Advanced Funds for Acquisition If all or a portion of GRANT funds ADVANCED to the title or escrow company are not expended, the unused portion of the ADVANCED funds must be returned to OGALS within 60 days after completion of the acquisitions), within 60 days of the acquisition withdrawal, or within 60 days after the end of the GRANT PERFORMANCE PERIOD, whichever is earliest. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 69 of 217 42 Per Capita Contract State of California – The Natural Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Sample Grant Contract Per Capita Grant Program GRANTEE: Grantee Name GRANT PERFORMANCE PERIOD is from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2024 CONTRACT PERFORMANCE PERIOD is from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2048 The GRANTEE agrees to the terms and conditions of this contract (CONTRACT), and the State of California, acting through its Director of the Department of Parks and Recreation, pursuant to the State of California, agrees to fund the total State grant amount indicated below. The GRANTEE agrees to complete the PROJECT SCOPE(s) as defined in the Development PROJECT SCOPE/Cost Estimate Form or acquisition documentation for the application(s) filed with the State of California. The General and Special Provisions attached are made a part of and incorporated into the Contract. Total State grant amount not to exceed $ [GRANT amount] GRANTEE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Signature Date Print Name and Title STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Signature Date Print Name and Title CERTIFICATION OF FUNDING (FOR STATE USE ONLY) AMOUNT OF ESTIMATE $ CONTRACT NUMBER FUND ADJ. INCREASING ENCUMBRANCE $ APPROPRIATION ADJ. DECREASING ENCUMBRANCE $ ITEM VENDOR NUMBER UNENCUMBERED BALANCE $ LINE ITEM ALLOTMENT CHAPTER STATUTE FISCAL YEAR T.B.A. NO. B.R. NO. INDEX Funding Source OBJ. EXPEND I hereby certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance. SIGNATURE OF ACCOUNTING OFFICER DATE ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 70 of 217 43 I.RECITALS This CONTRACT is entered into between the California Department of Parks and Recreation (hereinafter referred to as “GRANTOR,” “DEPARTMENT” or “STATE”) and [grantee name] (hereinafter referred to as “GRANTEE”). The DEPARTMENT hereby grants to GRANTEE a sum (also referred to as “GRANT MONIES”) not to exceed $grant amount, subject to the terms and conditions of this CONTRACT and the 20xx/xx California State Budget, Chapter xx, statutes of 20xx, Item number – 3790-xxx-xxxx (appropriation chapter and budget item number hereinafter referred to as “PER CAPITA GRANT”). These funds shall be used for completion of the GRANT SCOPE(S). The Grant Performance Period is from July 1, 20xx to June 30, 20xx. II.GENERAL PROVISIONS A.Definitions As used in this CONTRACT, the following words shall have the following meanings: 1.The term “ACT” means the California Drought, Water, Parks Climate, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access for All Act of 2018, as referred to in section I of this CONTRACT. 2.The term “APPLICATION” means the individual project APPLICATION packet for a project pursuant to the enabling legislation and/or grant program process guide requirements. 3.The term “DEPARTMENT” or “STATE” means the California Department of Parks and Recreation. 4.The term “DEVELOPMENT” means capital improvements to real property by means of, but not limited to, construction, expansion, and/or renovation, of permanent or fixed features of the property. 5. The term “GRANTEE” means the party described as the GRANTEE in Section I of this CONTRACT. 6.The term “GRANT SCOPE” means the items listed in the GRANT SCOPE/Cost Estimate Form or acquisition documentation found in each of the APPLICATIONS submitted pursuant to this grant. 7.The term “PROCEDURAL GUIDE” means the document identified as the “Procedural Guide for California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access For All Act of 2018 Per Capita Program.” The PROCEDURAL GUIDE provides the procedures and policies controlling the administration of the grant. B.Project Execution 1. Subject to the availability of GRANT MONIES in the act, the STATE hereby grants to the GRANTEE a sum of money not to exceed the amount stated in Section I of this CONTRACT, in consideration of, and on condition that, the sum be expended in carrying out the purposes as set forth in the enabling legislation and referenced in the APPLICATION, Section I of this CONTRACT, and under the terms and conditions set forth in this CONTRACT. The GRANTEE shall assume any obligation to furnish any additional funds that may be necessary to complete the GRANT SCOPE(S). The GRANTEE agrees to submit any change or alteration from the original GRANT SCOPE(S) in writing to the STATE for prior approval. This applies to any and all changes that occur after ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 71 of 217 44 STATE has approved the APPLICATION. Changes in the GRANT SCOPE(S) must be approved in writing by the STATE. 2. The GRANTEE shall complete the GRANT SCOPE(S) in accordance with the time of the Grant Performance Period set forth in Section I of this CONTRACT, and under the terms and conditions of this CONTRACT. 3. The GRANTEE shall comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code, §21000, et seq., Title 14, California Code of Regulations, §15000 et seq.). 4. The GRANTEE shall comply with all applicable current laws and regulations affecting DEVELOPMENT projects, including, but not limited to, legal requirements for construction contracts, building codes, health and safety codes, and laws and codes pertaining to individuals with disabilities, including but not limited to the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. §12101 et seq.) and the California Unruh Act (California Civil Code §51 et seq.). C.Procedural Guide 1.GRANTEE agrees to abide by the PROCEDURAL GUIDE. 2.GRANTEE acknowledges that STATE may make reasonable changes to its procedures as set forth in the PROCEDURAL GUIDE. If STATE makes any changes to its procedures and guidelines, STATE agrees to notify GRANTEE within a reasonable time. D.Project Administration 1.If GRANT MONIES are advanced for DEVELOPMENT projects, the advanced funds shall be placed in an interest bearing account until expended. Interest earned on the advanced funds shall be used on the project as approved by the STATE. If grant monies are advanced and not expended, the unused portion of the grant and any interest earned shall be returned to the STATE within 60 days after project completion or end of the Grant Performance Period, whichever is earlier. 2. The GRANTEE shall submit written project status reports within 30 calendar days after the STATE has made such a request. In any event, the GRANTEE shall provide the STATE a report showing total final project expenditures within 60 days of project completion or the end of the grant performance period, whichever is earlier. The Grant Performance Period is identified in Section I of this CONTRACT. 3. The GRANTEE shall make property or facilities acquired and/or developed pursuant to this contract available for inspection upon request by the STATE. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 72 of 217 45 E.Project Termination 1.Project Termination refers to the non-completion of a GRANT SCOPE. Any grant funds that have not been expended by the GRANTEE shall revert to the STATE. 2.The GRANTEE may unilaterally rescind this CONTRACT at any time prior to the commencement of the project. The commencement of the project means the date of the letter notifying GRANTEE of the award or when the funds are appropriated, whichever is later. After project commencement, this CONTRACT may be rescinded, modified or amended only by mutual agreement in writing between the GRANTEE and the STATE, unless the provisions of this CONTRACT provide that mutual agreement is not required. 3.Failure by the GRANTEE to comply with the terms of the (a) PROCEDURAL GUIDE, (b) any legislation applicable to the ACT, (c) this CONTRACT as well as any other grant contracts, specified or general, that GRANTEE has entered into with STATE, may be cause for suspension of all obligations of the STATE unless the STATE determines that such failure was due to no fault of the GRANTEE. In such case, STATE may reimburse GRANTEE for eligible costs properly incurred in performance of this CONTRACT despite non-performance of the GRANTEE. To qualify for such reimbursement, GRANTEE agrees to mitigate its losses to the best of its ability. 4.Any breach of any term, provision, obligation or requirement of this CONTRACT by the GRANTEE shall be a default of this CONTRACT. In the case of any default by GRANTEE, STATE shall be entitled to all remedies available under law and equity, including but not limited to: a) Specific Performance; b) Return of all GRANT MONIES; c) Payment to the STATE of the fair market value of the project property or the actual sales price, whichever is higher; and d) Payment to the STATE of the costs of enforcement of this CONTRACT, including but not limited to court and arbitration costs, fees, expenses of litigation, and reasonable attorney fees. 5.The GRANTEE and the STATE agree that if the GRANT SCOPE includes DEVELOPMENT, final payment may not be made until the work described in the GRANT SCOPE is complete and the GRANT PROJECT is open to the public. F.Budget Contingency Clause If funding for any fiscal year is reduced or deleted by the budget act for purposes of this program, the STATE shall have the option to either cancel this contract with no liability occurring to the STATE, or offer a CONTRACT amendment to GRANTEE to reflect the reduced grant amount. This Paragraph shall not require the mutual agreement as addressed in Paragraph E, provision 2, of this CONTRACT. G.Hold Harmless 1.The GRANTEE shall waive all claims and recourse against the STATE including the right to contribution for loss or damage to persons or property arising from, growing out of or in any way connected with or incident to this CONTRACT except claims arising from the concurrent or sole negligence of the STATE, its officers, agents, and employees. 2.The GRANTEE shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the STATE, its officers, agents and employees against any and all claims, demands, damages, costs, expenses or liability costs arising out of the ACQUISITION, DEVELOPMENT, construction, operation or maintenance of the property described as the project which claims, demands or causes of action arise under California Government Code Section 895.2 or otherwise except for liability arising out of the concurrent or sole negligence of the STATE, its officers, agents, or employees. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 73 of 217 46 3.The GRANTEE agrees that in the event the STATE is named as codefendant under the provisions of California Government Code Section 895 et seq., the GRANTEE shall notify the STATE of such fact and shall represent the STATE in the legal action unless the STATE undertakes to represent itself as codefendant in such legal action in which event the GRANTEE agrees to pay the STATE’s litigation costs, expenses, and reasonable attorney fees. 4. The GRANTEE and the STATE agree that in the event of judgment entered against the STATE and the GRANTEE because of the concurrent negligence of the STATE and the GRANTEE, their officers, agents, or employees, an apportionment of liability to pay such judgment shall be made by a court of competent jurisdiction. Neither party shall request a jury apportionment. 5.The GRANTEE shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the STATE, its officers, agents and employees against any and all claims, demands, costs, expenses or liability costs arising out of legal actions pursuant to items to which the GRANTEE has certified. The GRANTEE acknowledges that it is solely responsible for compliance with items to which it has certified. H.Financial Records 1.The GRANTEE shall maintain satisfactory financial accounts, documents, including loan documents, and all other records for the project and to make them available to the STATE for auditing at reasonable times. The GRANTEE also agrees to retain such financial accounts, documents and records for five years following project termination or issuance of final payment, whichever is later. The GRANTEE shall keep such records as the STATE shall prescribe, including records which fully d isclose (a) the disposition of the proceeds of STATE funding assistance, (b) the total cost of the project in connection with such assistance that is given or used, (c) the amount and nature of that portion of the project cost supplied by other sources, and (d) any other such records that will facilitate an effective audit. 3.The GRANTEE agrees that the STATE shall have the right to inspect and make copies of any books, records or reports pertaining to this contract or matters related thereto during regular office hours. The GRANTEE shall maintain and make available for inspection by the STATE accurate records of all of its costs, disbursements and receipts with respect to its activities under this contract. Such accounts, documents, and records shall be retained by the GRANTEE for at least five years following project termination or issuance of final payment, whichever is later. 4.The GRANTEE shall use a generally accepted accounting system. I.Use of Facilities 1.The GRANTEE agrees that the GRANTEE shall operate and maintain the property acquired or developed with the GRANT MONIES, for the duration of the Contract Performance Period. 2.The GRANTEE agrees that, during the Contract Performance Period, the GRANTEE shall use the property acquired or developed with GRANT MONIES under this contract only for the purposes of this grant and no other use, sale, or other disposition or change of the use of the property to one not consistent with its purpose shall be permitted except as authorized by the STATE and the property shall be replaced with property of equivalent value and usefulness as determined by the STATE. 3.The property acquired or developed may be transferred to another entity if the successor entity assumes the obligations imposed under this CONTRACT and with the approval of STATE. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 74 of 217 47 4.Any real Property (including any portion of it or any interest in it) may not be used as security for any debt or mitigation, without the written approval of the STATE provided that such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld as long as the purposes for which the Grant was awarded are maintained. Any such permission that is granted does not make the STATE a guarantor or a surety for any debt or mitigation, nor does it waive the STATE’S rights to enforce performance under the Grant CONTRACT. 5.All real property, or rights thereto, acquired with GRANT MONIES shall be subject to an appropriate form of restrictive title, rights, or covenants approved by the STATE. If the project property is taken by use of eminent domain, GRANTEE shall reimburse STATE an amount at least equal to the amount of GRANT MONIES received from STATE or the pro-rated full market value of the real property, including improvements, at the time of sale, whichever is higher. 6.If eminent domain proceedings are initiated against GRANTEE, GRANTEE shall notify STATE within 10 days of receiving the complaint. J.Nondiscrimination 1.The GRANTEE shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, age, religion, ancestry, sexual orientation, or disability in the use of any property or facility developed pursuant to this contract. 2.The GRANTEE shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of residence except to the extent that reasonable differences in admission or other fees may be maintained on the basis of residence and pursuant to law. 3.All facilities shall be open to members of the public generally, except as noted under the special provisions of this project contract or under provisions of the enabling legislation and/or grant program. K.Severability If any provision of this CONTRACT or the application thereof is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the CONTRACT which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this CONTRACT are severable. L.Liability 1.STATE assumes no responsibility for assuring the safety or standards of construction, site improvements or programs related to the GRANT SCOPE. The STATE’S rights under this CONTRACT to review, inspect and approve the GRANT SCOPE and any final plans of implementation shall not give rise to any warranty or representation that the GRANT SCOPE and any plans or improvements are free from hazards or defects. 2.GRANTEE will secure adequate liability insurance, performance bond, and/or other security necessary to protect the GRANTEE’s and STATE’S interest against poor workmanship, fraud, or other potential loss associated with completion of the grant project. M.Assignability Without the written consent of the STATE, the GRANTEE’S interest in and responsibilities under this CONTRACT shall not be assignable by the GRANTEE either in whole or in part. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 75 of 217 48 N. Use of Grant Monies GRANTEE shall not use any grant funds (including any portion thereof) for the purpose of making any leverage loan, pledge, promissory note or similar financial device or transaction, without: 1) the prior written approval of the STATE; and 2) any financial or legal interests created by any such leverage loan, pledge, promissory note or similar financial device or transaction in the project property shall be completely subordinated to this CONTRACT through a Subordination Agreement provided and approved by the STATE, signed by all parties involved in the transaction, and recorded in the County Records against the fee title of the project property. N. Section Headings The headings and captions of the various sections of this CONTRACT have been inserted only for the purpose of convenience and are not a part of this CONTRACT and shall not be deemed in any manner to modify, explain, or restrict any of the provisions of this CONTRACT. O. Waiver Any failure by a party to enforce its rights under this CONTRACT, in the event of a breach, shall not be construed as a waiver of said rights; and the waiver of any breach under this CONTRACT shall not be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach. GRANTEE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Signature Date Print Name and Title STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Signature Date Print Name and Title ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 76 of 217 49 Accounting and Audits Accounting Requirements GRANTEES must use accounting practices that: •Provide accounting data that clearly records costs incurred on the PROJECT and accurately reflects fiscal transactions, with the necessary controls and safeguards. •Provide good audit trails, especially the source documents (purchase orders, receipts, progress payments, invoices, timecards, cancelled warrants, warrant numbers, etc.) specific to the PROJECT. Accounting Rules for Employee Services (IN-HOUSE EMPLOYEE SERVICES) GRANTEES must follow these accounting practices for employee services: •Maintain time and attendance records as charges are incurred, identifying the employee through a name or other tracking system, and that employee’s actual time spent on the PROJECT. •Time estimates, including percentages, for work performed on the PROJECT are not acceptable. •Time sheets that do not identify the specific employee’s time spent on the PROJECT are not acceptable. •Costs of the salaries and wages must be calculated according to the GRANTEE’S wage and salary scales, and may include benefit costs such as vacation, health insurance, pension contributions and workers’ compensation. •Overtime costs may be allowed under the GRANTEE’S established policy, provided that the regular work time was devoted to the same PROJECT. •May not include overhead or cost allocation. These are costs generally associated with supporting an employee, such as rent, personnel support, IT, utilities, etc. State Audit Grants are subject to audit by DPR. All PROJECT records must be retained for five years after final payment was issued, or PROJECT terminated, whichever is later. The GRANTEE must provide the following when an audit date and time has been confirmed by DPR: •All PROJECT records, including the source documents and cancelled warrants, books, papers, accounts, time sheets, or other records listed in the Audit Checklist or requested by DPR. •An employee having knowledge of the PROJECT and its records to assist the DPR auditor. Record Keeping Recommendation GRANTEES are encouraged to keep records of all eligible costs, including those not submitted to OGALS for payment. This provides a potential source of additional eligible costs, should any submitted expenses be deemed ineligible. Contact the DPR Audits Office at (916) 657-0370 for questions about these requirements. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 77 of 217 50 Audit Checklist An audit of the PROJECT may be performed before or following PROJECT completion. The GRANTEE must retain and make available all PROJECT related records for five years following PROJECT termination or final payment of GRANT funds. Listed below are some of the items the auditor will examine during the review of your records as applicable. It is the responsibility of the GRANTEE to have these records available in a central location ready for review once an audit date and time has been confirmed. If you have any questions regarding these documents, contact the State Department of Parks and Recreation Audits Office at (916) 657-0370. CONTRACTS □Summary list of bidders (including individual bid packages) □Recommendation by reviewer of bids □Award by governing body (minutes of the meeting/resolution) □Construction contract agreement □Contract bonds (bid, performance, payment) □Contract change orders □Contractor's progress billings □Payments to contractor (cancelled checks/ warrants, bank statements, EFT receipts**) □Stop Notices (filed by sub-contractors and release if applicable) □Liquidated damages (claimed against the contractor) □Notice of completion (recorded) IN-HOUSE EMPLOYEE SERVICES* □Authorization/work order identifying project □Daily time sheets signed by employee and supervisor □Hourly rate (salary schedules/payroll register) □Fringe benefits (provide breakdown) IN-HOUSE EQUIPMENT* □Authorization/work order □Daily time records identifying the project site □Hourly rate related backup documents MINOR CONTRACTS/ MATERIALS/ SERVICES/EQUIPMENT RENTALS □Purchase orders/Contracts/Service Agreements □Invoices □Payments (cancelled checks/ warrants, bank statements and EFT receipts **) ACQUISITION □Appraisal Report □Did the owner accompany the appraiser? □10 year history □Statement of just compensation (signed by seller) □Statement of difference (if purchased above appraisal) □Waiver of just compensation (if purchased below appraisal: signed by seller) □Final Escrow Closing Statement □Cancelled checks/warrants, bank statements and EFT receipts, [payment(s) to seller(s)] □GRANT deed (vested to the participant) or final order of condemnation □Title insurance policy (issued to participant) □Relocation documents □Income (rental, grazing, sale of improvements, etc.) INTEREST □Schedule of interest earned on State funds advanced (Interest on grant advances is accountable, even if commingled in a pooled fund account and/or interest was never allocated back to the grant fund.) AGREEMENT/CONTRACTS □Leases, agreements, etc., pertaining to developed/acquired property □Proof of insurance pertaining to developed/acquired property *Estimated time expended on the projects is not acceptable. Actual time records and all supporting documentation must be maintained as charges are incurred and made available for verification at the time of audit. ** Front and back if copied. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 78 of 217 51 References Public Resources Code relating to the Proposition 68 Per Capita program 80000. This division shall be known, and may be cited, as the California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access For All Act of 2018. 80001. (b) It is the intent of the people of California that all of the following shall occur in the implementation of this division: (3) To the extent practicable, a project that receives moneys pursuant to this division will include signage informing the public that the project received funds from the California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access For All Act of 2018. (5) To the extent practicable, a project that receives moneys pursuant to this division will provide workforce education and training, contractor, and job opportunities for disadvantaged communities. (7) To the extent practicable, administering entities should measure or require measurement of greenhouse gas emissions reductions and carbon sequestrations associated with projects that receive moneys pursuant to this division. (8) To the extent practicable, as identified in the “Presidential Memorandum-- Promoting Diversity and Inclusion in Our National Parks, National Forests, and Other Public Lands and Waters,” dated January 12, 2017, the public agencies that receive funds pursuant to this division will consider a range of actions that include, but are not limited to, the following: (A) Conducting active outreach to diverse populations, particularly minority, low- income, and disabled populations and tribal communities, to increase awareness within those communities and the public generally about specific programs and opportunities. (B) Mentoring new environmental, outdoor recreation, and conservation leaders to increase diverse representation across these areas. (C) Creating new partnerships with state, local, tribal, private, and nonprofit organizations to expand access for diverse populations. (D) Identifying and implementing improvements to existing programs to increase visitation and access by diverse populations, particularly minority, low-income, and disabled populations and tribal communities. (E) Expanding the use of multilingual and culturally appropriate materials in public communications and educational strategies, including through social media strategies, as appropriate, that target diverse populations. (F) Developing or expanding coordinated efforts to promote youth engagement and empowerment, including fostering new partnerships with diversity-serving and youth-serving organizations, urban areas, and programs. (G) Identifying possible staff liaisons to diverse populations. 80002. (d) “Department” means the Department of Parks and Recreation. (n) “Severely disadvantaged community” means a community with a median household income less than 60 percent of the statewide average. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 79 of 217 52 80020. Moneys allocated pursuant to this division shall not be used to fulfill any mitigation requirements imposed by law. CHAPTER 3. 80060. For purposes of this chapter, “district” means any regional park district, regional park and open-space district, or regional open-space district formed pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with §5500) of Chapter 3 of Division 5, any recreation and park district formed pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with §5780) of Division 5, or any authority formed pursuant to Division 26 (commencing with §35100). With respect to any community or unincorporated region that is not included within a district, and in which no city or county provides parks or recreational areas or facilities, “district” also means any other entity, including, but not limited to, a district operating multiple-use parklands pursuant to Division 20 (commencing with §71000) of the Water Code. 80061. (a) The sum of two hundred million dollars ($200,000,000) shall be available to the department, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for local park rehabilitation, creation, and improvement grants to local governments on a per capita basis. Grant recipients shall be encouraged to utilize awards to rehabilitate existing infrastructure and to address deficiencies in neighborhoods lacking access to the outdoors. (b) The sum of fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000) shall be available to the department, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for grants to cities and districts in urbanized counties providing park and recreation services within jurisdictions of 200,000 or less in population. For purposes of this subdivision, “urbanized county” means a county with a population of 500,000 or more. An entity eligible to receive funds under this subdivision shall also be eligible to receive funds available under subdivision (a). (c) Unless the project has been identified as serving a severely disadvantaged community, an entity that receives an award pursuant to this section shall be required to provide a match of 20 percent as a local share. 80062. (a)(1) The department shall allocate 60 percent of the funds available pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 80061 to cities and districts, other than a regional park district, regional park and open-space district, open-space authority, or regional open-space district. Each city’s and district’s allocation shall be in the same ratio as the city’s or district’s population is to the combined total of the state’s population that is included in incorporated and unincorporated areas within the county, except that each city or district shall be entitled to a minimum allocation of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000). If the boundary of a city overlaps the boundary of a district, the population in the overlapping area shall be attributed to each jurisdiction in proportion to the extent to which each operates and manages parks and recreational areas and facilities for that population. If the boundary of a city overlaps the boundary of a district, and in the area of overlap the city does not operate and manage parks and recreational areas and facilities, all grant funds for that area shall be allocated to the district. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 80 of 217 53 (2)On or before April 1, 2020, a city and a district that are subject to paragraph (1), and whose boundaries overlap, shall collaboratively develop and submit to the department a specific plan for allocating the grant funds in accordance with the formula specified in paragraph (1). If, by that date, the plan has not been developed and submitted to the department, the director shall determine the allocation of the grant funds between the affected jurisdictions. (b)(1) The department shall allocate 40 percent of the funds available pursuant to subdivision (a) of §80061 to counties and regional park districts, regional park and open-space districts, open-space authorities formed pursuant to Division 26 (commencing with §35100), and regional open-space districts formed pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with §5500) of Chapter 3 of Division 5. (2)Each county’s allocation under paragraph (1) shall be in the same ratio that the county’s population is to the total state population, except that each county shall be entitled to a minimum allocation of four hundred thousand dollars ($400,000). (3)In any county that embraces all or part of the territory of a regional park district, regional park and open-space district, open-space authority, or regional open- space district, and whose board of directors is not the county board of supervisors, the amount allocated to the county shall be apportioned between that district and the county in proportion to the population of the county that is included within the territory of the district and the population of the county that is outside the territory of the district. (c)For the purpose of making the calculations required by this section, population shall be determined by the department, in cooperation with the Department of Finance, on the basis of the most recent verifiable census data and other verifiable population data that the department may require to be furnished by the applicant city, county, or district. (d)The Legislature intends all recipients of funds pursuant to subdivision (a) of §80061 to use those funds to supplement local revenues in existence on the effective date of the act adding this division. To receive an allocation pursuant to subdivision (a) of §80061, the recipient shall not reduce the amount of funding otherwise available to be spent on parks or other projects eligible for funds under this division in its jurisdiction. A one-time allocation of other funding that has been expended for parks or other projects, but which is not available on an ongoing basis, shall not be considered when calculating a recipient’s annual expenditures. For purposes of this subdivision, the Controller may request fiscal data from recipients for the preceding three fiscal years. Each recipient shall furnish the data to the Controller no later than 120 days after receiving the request from the Controller. 80063. (a)The director of the department shall prepare and adopt criteria and procedures for evaluating applications for grants allocated pursuant to subdivision (a) of §80061. The application shall be accompanied by certification that the project is consistent with the park and recreation element of the applicable city or county general plan or the district park recreation plan, as the case may be. (b)To utilize available grant funds as effectively as possible, overlapping and adjoining jurisdictions and applicants with similar objectives are encouraged to combine projects and submit a joint application. A recipient may allocate all or a portion of its per capita share for a regional or state project. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 81 of 217 54 Allocation Tables Visit OGALS’ Per Capita webpage at www.parks.ca.gov/percapita for allocations. Allocation Transfer Entities that receive an allocation under the Per Capita program may transfer all or part of that allocation to another eligible entity, provided that the following requirements are met: 1. All required documentation must be submitted no later than six months from the end of the encumbrance period. 2. The transferring agency must submit a resolution authorizing the transfer of the allocation. The resolution must name the recipient entity and the transferred amount.6 3. The recipient must be eligible to receive Per Capita funds. 4. The recipient must have submitted the authorizing resolution shown on page 7. 5. The recipient must submit a resolution authorizing the receipt of funds; the resolution must state the donor and the transferred amount. 6 Please contact OGALS for sample transfer and recipient resolutions. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 82 of 217 55 Definitions Capitalized words and terms used in this guide are defined below. ADVANCE – payment made to the GRANTEE for work that will occur in the future or work that has already occurred during the GRANT PERFORMANCE PERIOD and has not been paid for by the GRANTEE. APPLICATION PACKET – the Application form and its required attachments described in the Application Checklist and Directions beginning on page 10. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE – the GRANTEE’S designated position authorized in the Resolution to sign all required GRANT documents. CEQA – the California Environmental Quality Act established policies and procedures requiring GRANTEES to identify, disclose to decision makers and the public, and attempt to lessen, significant impacts to environmental and historical resources that may occur as a result of the GRANTEE’S proposed PROJECT. (Public Resources Code §21000 et seq.; Title 14 California Code of Regulations §15000 et seq.) CONSTRUCTION COSTS – costs incurred starting with the date when ground-breaking construction activities such as site preparation, grading, or gutting begins, and continuing to the end of the GRANT PERFORMANCE PERIOD. CONTRACT PERFORMANCE PERIOD – the amount of time stated on the contract agreement, specifying the performance of the contractual grant obligations between the GRANTEE and DPR. DEVELOPMENT – construction, expansion, or renovation. DPR – the California Department of Parks and Recreation. GRANT – funds made available to a GRANTEE for completion of the PROJECT SCOPE(s) during the GRANT PERFORMANCE PERIOD. GRANTEE – an entity having a fully executed contract with DPR. GRANT PERFORMANCE PERIOD – period of time that eligible costs may be incurred by the GRANTEE and paid for by DPR, as specified in the fully executed contract. IN-HOUSE EMPLOYEE SERVICES – use of the GRANTEE’S employees working on the PROJECT SCOPE. OGALS – DPR’s Office of Grants and Local Services. PRE-CONSTRUCTION COSTS – costs incurred within the GRANT PERFORMANCE PERIOD for the planning, design, and permit phase of the PROJECT before construction can begin. PROJECT – the SCOPE as described in the APPLICATION PACKET to be completed with GRANT funds. PROJECT COMPLETION – when the PROJECT is complete and the facilities are open and useable by the public. PROJECT COMPLETION PACKET – The documents listed on page 37 that are required in order to request final payment following PROJECT COMPLETION. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 83 of 217 56 PROJECT OFFICER – an OGALS employee, who acts as a liaison with GRANTEES and administers GRANT funds, facilitates compliance with the Procedural Guide, and the GRANT contract. SCOPE – the acquisition, recreation features, and major support amenities described in the APPLICATION PACKET that must be completed prior to final GRANT payment. TOTAL PROJECT COST – the combined dollar amount of all funding sources used to complete the acquisition, or recreation features and major support amenities described in the APPLICATION PACKET. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 2 Page 84 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: A-5 DATE: 10/26/21 Atascadero City Council Staff Report - City Manager Virtual Meetings – AB 361 Requirements RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt Draft Resolution making findings consistent with the requirements of AB 361 to continue to allow for the conduct of virtual meetings. DISCUSSION: On March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom declared a state of emergency due to the novel coronavirus COVID-19. That declaration is still in effect. Since March 12, 2020, Executive Orders from the Governor relaxed various Brown Act meetin g requirements relating to teleconferencing rules, temporarily suspending the Brown Act provisions requiring the physical presence of council, board and commission members at public meetings. The most recent extension of those Orders expired on September 30, 2021. On Friday, September 17, 2021, the Governor signed AB 361 . AB 361 amends Government Code section 54953 to provide more clarity on the Brown Act’s rules and restrictions surrounding the use of teleconferencing to conduct meetings. The newly enacted Government Code Section 54953(e) creates alternate measures to protect the ability of the public to appear before local legislative bodies. With the passage of AB 361, local agencies are allowed to continue to conduct virtual meetings during a declared state of emergency, provided local agencies comply with specified requirements. The City Council previously adopted Resolution No. 2021-066 on September 28, 2021, finding that the requisite conditions exist for the legislative bodies of the City of Atascadero to conduct remote teleconference meetings in compliance with AB 361. (Government Code Section 54953(e).) AB 361 requires the City Council to reconsider the circumstances of the state of emergency not later than 30 days after teleconferencing for the first time pursuant to AB 361 and every 30 days thereafter in order to continue to conduct remote teleconference meetings. In order to continue remote teleconferencing, the City Council must make the following findings (Gov. Code § 52953(e)(3)): • The City Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency. • Any of the following circumstances exist: Page 85 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: A-5 DATE: 10/26/21 o The state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person. o State or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing. On August 31, 2021, County Health Officer issued Order No. 6 requiring face coverings in all public indoor settings and this order continues to remain in effect. Additionally, the City remains subject to the State Occupational Safety and Health Administration (CalOSHA) regulations which, among other requirements, obligate an employer to provide training to employees on COVID-19 transmission and risk reduction, including “The fact that particles containing the virus can travel more than six feet, especially indoors, so physical distancing, face coverings, increased ventilation indoors, and respiratory protection decrease the spread of COVID-19, but are most effective when used in combination.” (CCR Section 3205(c)5(D).) Adoption of the Draft Resolution reaffirms the Health Officer Order and CalOSHA requirements as the basis for continuing to meet virtually. Additionally, adoption of the Draft Resolution does not prohibit the conduct of a traditional or hybrid meeting if the circumstances of the declared health emergency change. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENT: Draft Resolution Page 86 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: A-5 DATE: ATTACHMENT: 10/26/21 1 DRAFT RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, PROCLAIMING THE CONTINUING NEED TO MEET BY TELECONFERENCE PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953(e) WHEREAS, all meetings of the City of Atascadero legislative bodies are open and public as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act (Cal. Gov. Code 54950 – 54963); and WHEREAS, the Brown Act, Government Code section 54953(e), makes provisions for remote teleconferencing participation in meetings by members of a legislative body, without compliance with the requirements of Government Code section 54953(b)(3), subject to the existence of certain conditions; and WHEREAS, Government Code section 54953(e) was added by AB 361, signed by Governor Newsom on September 17, 2021; and WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom declared a State of Emergency as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic; and WHEREAS, on March 17, 2020, the City of Atascadero declared a State of Emergency as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic; and WHEREAS, such State of Emergency remains in effect; and WHEREAS, COVID-19 continues to threaten the health and lives of City of Atascadero residents; and WHEREAS, the Delta variant is highly transmissible in indoor settings and breakthrough cases are becoming more common; and WHEREAS, local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing to include the wearing of masks indoors, regardless of vaccination status; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously adopted Resolution No. 2021-066 on September 28, 2021, finding that the requisite conditions exist for the legislative bodies of the City of Atascadero to conduct remote teleconference meetings in compliance with Government Code Section 54953(e); and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 54953(e) requires that the City Council must reconsider the circumstances of the state of emergency every 30 days in order to continue to conduct remote teleconference meetings in compliance with AB 361. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Atascadero: Page 87 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: A-5 DATE: ATTACHMENT: 10/26/21 1 SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by this reference. SECTION 2. Findings. The City Council does hereby find that: 1. The City Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency declared as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. 2. The COVID-19 pandemic continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person whereby holding legislative body meetings in person will present imminent risk to the health and safety of attendees. 3. State or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing. SECTION 3. Compliance with Government Code Section 54953(e). The City Council and other legislative bodies will continue to meet by teleconference in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e). SECTION 4. Effective Date of Resolution. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and shall be effective until the earlier of (i) 30 days from the date of adoption of this Resolution, or (ii) such time the City Council adopts a subsequent resolution in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e)(3) to extend the time during which the legislative bodies of the City of Atascadero may continue to teleconference without compliance with paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of section 54953. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the ______ day of _______________, 2021. On motion by Council Member ____ and seconded by Council Member ____, the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CITY OF ATASCADERO ______________________________ Heather Moreno, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________________ Lara K. Christensen, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________________________ Brian A. Pierik, City Attorney Page 88 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/26/21 Atascadero City Council Staff Report – Community Development Department Affordable Housing Impact Fee Nexus Studies Update RECOMMENDATION: Council review and comment on the nexus study provided by EPS consultants for a potential affordable housing fee program as part of an affordable housing strategy. DISCUSSION: The adopted 2021-2028 Housing Element requires that the City adopt an inclusionary housing program to help address the City’s future needs for affordable housing . In March 2021, following adoption of the Housing Element, Council was asked to review options for the implementation of an inclusionary housing program. The Council and Planning Commission discussed: • Developing a program to encourage the development of housing that is affordable by design, • Developing a fee program to collect fees that can be utilized to support the development of future affordable housing • Or a combination of policy and incentives that meet Housing Element objectives. The City Council directed staff to explore a multifaceted approach that included the potential for an affordable housing linkage fee to capture opportunities for lower-income housing units with a focus on affordable-by-design strategies to incentivize moderate and workforce housing units. (See Attachment 1 for a review of goals and considerations). Options presented included adoption of mandates for new development to provide affordable housing, development standards that support and facilitate affordable -by- design units throughout the City and an affordable housing linkage fee charged on all new, market-rate residential development above an identified square-footage threshold to provide a funding source to support the construction of affordable housing . This report discusses one piece of the program: the relationship (or nexus) between new housing development and the need to fund future affordable housing through a potential fee program. Other portions of the housing program will be brought forward to the City Council at a later date. Page 89 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/26/21 In coordination with MIG, the City’s Housing Element consultant, the C ity hired Economic & Planning Systems (EPS) to provide analysis and options for the development of an affordable housing linkage fee as a potential part of the City’s comprehensive strategy for the provision and facilitation of affordable housing to meet the City’s affordable housing goals. This is the first step in the analysis which will enable the consultant team to provide information and calculations for potential linkage fees, options for charging the fees, and analysis of development costs to ensure that any fee is realistic and feasible. ANALYSIS: The Affordable Housing Impact Fee Nexus Study will examine the gap between the cost of developing housing and what Very Low- and Low-income households can afford and recommend strategies to support the City’s affordable housing fund. Impact fees are a common tool used to increase City funding that can be applied towards the development of affordable housing. Adoption of impact fees requires a technical study to determine ‘nexus’ between new market rate development and demand for affordable units. Prototype and Gap Analysis In order to support an impact fee, a nexus needs to be established between the impact of new market-rate housing development and the need for affordable housing units. In general, new market-rate housing generates a need for increased services and thus, added service sector employees. The nexus analysis looks at what type of housing is built and how much those households earn and spend in the local economy. That leads to understanding how many jobs may be generated from that spending and how much those employees earn. This in turn informs how many housing units are needed for those added employees and what the gap is between h ousing development costs and employee household purchasing power. In determining the impact, a number of assumptions are built into the analysis. In September and October, EPS met with r egional housing and lending experts from the nonprofit and private sector to better understand the development process, local housing market dynamics and issues, and to vet assumptions used in the analysis. The analysis takes into account local density and typical sizes of housing units developed for lower-income households. Page 90 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/26/21 Fee Structure Options There are a variety of ways that a nexus fee can be structured. The fee can be based on unit type, unit size, lot size, zoning, etc. or a combination of factors. Fees can also be discounted or waived for units under a certain square-footage to encourage units that are considered “affordable-by-design”. In general, the analysis correlates key characteristics of the new development (e.g., unit type, unit size, lot size, zoning, etc.) to assumptions about household income level when exploring alternative methods to a flat per unit fee. This means that alternative methods may inherently include some level of fee discount as we explore geographic or per square-foot based fees. The following discussion includes each option with pros and cons listed. A. Single family per unit and multifamily per unit: This would establish a flat fee based on unit type regardless of unit size. Pro: • Easy to administer, with clear definitions. Con: • Discourages “affordable by design” and encourages larger units. Page 91 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/26/21 B. Single family per square foot and multifamily per square foot: This would establish different per square-foot fees based on unit type and establish a maximum fee so as not to exceed amounts supported by the nexus analysis. Pros: • Encourages smaller units and those considered “affordable by design”. • Straight forward and easy to administer with clear definitions of unit types and parameters for which square-footage is used to calculate the fee. Con: • Fee will tier down from a per unit amount (established through nexus) that is tied to the median-sized home. • New units that are smaller than the median-sized home will not generate as much revenue as they would under a flat fee per unit structure. • New units that are larger than the median -sized home will not pay more than the maximum amount established by Nexus , which may end up being less on a per square foot basis. C. Unit size as a threshold: This approach would charge one fee to units smaller than 2,000 square feet, for example, and a different fee to units larger than 2,000 square feet. Pro: • Allows for meaningful differences in likely household income based on the size threshold. Con: • Because the maximum fee is tied to a median house size, the per square - foot fee could be lower for larger homes, resulting in a perception that larger homes pay less. D. Zoning based fee (RS vs. other zones): In Atascadero, there is a correlation between location and cost of housing. Homes on larger acreage tend to be higher-cost properties regardless of housing unit size. A nexus fee could be tied to zoning which roughly correlates to lot size which may correlate with home value and, therefore, household income . Pro: • Allows for meaningful differences in household income for larger acreage property occupants based on zoning. Con: • Zoning is not always a perfect indicator of land use type. For example, RS zoned parcels adjacent to El Camino Real are different than larger view lots on the west side. • There is not a meaningful distinction in unit size when compared across zoning designations based on recent permit history. More analysis is needed to determine if there is a meaningful distinction in value. • Many undeveloped parcels left on the west side within the RS zoning are difficult parcels to develop with larger houses. Page 92 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/26/21 E. Fee based on “in” or “outside” the City’s Urban Services Line: This fee structure would look at a per unit or per square -foot based fee tied to whether a parcel is inside or outside the Urban Services Line. The fee has a geographic componen t that provides some nexus to the larger added value acreage properties while focusing more on proximity to services and nearness to the City’s core rather than underlying zoning designations. Pro: • Allows meaningful differences in likely unit size and/or household income. Con: • Could result in a lower square-foot fee for properties outside the Urban Services Line depending on the analysis of median house size by location. Potential Exemptions Currently, three is a legal exemption from Inclusionary Housing Fees imposed upon ADUs under 750 square-feet and deed restricted affordable units. Council may want to consider policies for additional exemptions which may include , but not be limited to: ▪ Units that are “Affordable by Design” (smaller than 1,000 square feet) ▪ Areas targeted for infill ▪ Deed-restricted units (by income or age) ▪ Replacement units (redevelopment) ▪ Rebuilt units (post fire, flood, earthquake, etc.) ▪ Other Conclusion Staff and the Consultant are looking for feedback on the preferred fee struct ure based on examples A through E above and based on the suggested exemptions. The Council may also wish to provide additional direction on factors to consider for fee analysis. It is important that local considerations and factors are considered but also vital that the available data be able to support the analysis and provide a basis for any impact fee. Next Steps Once the consultant receives input on a preferred fee structure and factors to consider, they will complete the nexus study and present their findings. The Council will then have to opportunity to determine appropriate discounts and exemptions to balance the need for affordable housing with community and economic growth. FISCAL IMPACT: Project costs are covered by grant funding received through Senate Bill 2 (SB 2). SB 2 allocates funding to each local community based on population size. In Atascadero, $160,000 was allocated towards activities that meet the grant criteria, specifically activities that demonstrate a clear path to the production of affordable housing. $93,925 was dedicated toward the development and adoption of the 2021 -2028 Housing Element. The remaining $66,075 of grant funding is earmarked for this project. Page 93 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: Overview of Housing Program Goals and Considerations Page 94 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: ATTACHMENT: 10/26/21 1 Page 95 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: ATTACHMENT: 10/26/21 1 Page 96 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: ATTACHMENT: 10/26/21 1 Page 97 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 Atascadero City Council Staff Report – Fire Department Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study RECOMMENDATION: Council receive and file the Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study. DISCUSSION: The Atascadero City Council, in response to recent catastrophic wildfire events and the potential for lengthy power shutdowns, adopted “Ensure Comprehensive Safety Readiness and Risk Mitigation” as one of three main goals in the 2019-2021 City of Atascadero Action Plan. One of the broad categories included under this goal was to implement a comprehensive evacuation and communications plan. In early 2020, staff began researching potential contractors to assist the City in developing this evacuation and communications plan. Evacuation planning for all hazards is important, however, using new technology to develop mass-evacuation plans in response to recent fast-moving wildfires in a wildland urban interface area is critical. Data-driven wildfire evacuation systems that use GIS mapping plus real-time weather and traffic are a new and emerging area of expertise. Atascadero Fire was one of the very first agencies in the State to execute a contract with Zonehaven to provide the Evacuation Management Platform for the City of Atascadero. Zonehaven was formed as a result of devastating fires in Northern California and has since partnered with over 200 cities throughout the State. They developed a wildfire planning and evacuation management system that can be used for all hazards. Components of the plan include: • Smart evacuation zones • Dynamic, up-to-date maps and plans • Custom fire/evacuation scenarios and recommendations • A community evacuation interface with multi-channel notifications Zonehaven was implemented in Atascadero during 2020 and was ready for use before the wildfire season of 2021. Zones are identified and available for the public to receive current information. Fire and Police personnel have trained to activate a zone evacuation and start the notification process, which includes Hi/Lo sirens, City social media, landline and cell phone reverse 911 through the Sheriff’s Department and cell phone wireless emergency alerting through County OES. Zonehaven will be implemented throughout Page 98 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 San Luis Obispo by fire season 2022 and will give all emergency responders in the county a common operating platform on which to manage a large-scale evacuation. To meet the City Council goal of implementing a comprehensive evacuation plan, staff began to look for a consultant that would assist in further evaluation and detail. Staff was looking to address issues concerning the challenging geography and road structure of Atascadero such as clear, pre-identified evacuation routes, identified streets to close for one-way traffic, identified bottleneck areas for better use of traffic control, and identified neighborhoods with one way in/out access. In January of 2021, Atascadero Fire executed a contract with W -Trans to complete an in- depth traffic and engineering analysis to address the above questions. The final purpose of the study would be to provide strategies and action items to employ during a wildland fire or other natural disaster that would facilitate the evacuation of vehicles from zones established through the Zonehaven platform. The focus of the study was further defined into the following points: • Estimate evacuation time for groups of zones under various fire intrusion scenarios • Determine time savings by operating roads with contraflow lanes • Recommend traffic signal operational changes during evacuation • Recommend locations where manual traffic control should be provided • Identify road closure needs W-Trans has completed the study and provided recommendations in the attached report. One notable recommendation is the identified control points. These are ranked in the order of most critical and will be placed in the Zonehaven platform to identify those intersections where traffic control must occur to move cars quickly. This traffic control may be done manually by Police or Public Works staff or may involve changing traffic signals. Another recommendation includes limiting traffic from entering and exiting the freeway at certain on/off ramps during an evacuation. For this to occur, it will be critical that Atascadero Fire and Police Departments establish procedures with Cal Trans and CHP and train with those partners on a regular basis. For the full list of recommendations, see page 12 of the study. Evacuation planning continues to evolve in California. Atascadero has led the county with programs such as the Zonehaven platform and public education campaigns such as “Defend Atascadero,” “Know your Zone” and “Hear the Hi/Lo, time to go.” Recommendations from this study are additional tools that will help us to be better prepared and to better protect our community. FISCAL IMPACT: The study has no direct costs beyond previously approved consultant costs. Implementation of any recommendations may require additional costs that would be addressed with future budgeting and grant proposals. ATTACHMENT: Page 99 of 217 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 W-Trans Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study Page 100 of 217 490 Mendocino Avenue, Suite 201 SANTA ROSA, CA 95401 707.542.9500 7901 Oakport Street, Suite 1500 OAKLAND, CA 94621 510.444.2600 w-trans.com Draft Report Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study Prepared for the City of Atascadero October 14, 2021 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 101 of 217 1 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study for the City of Atascadero October 14, 2021 Introduction Analysis Focus This document provides traffic engineering analysis and findings related to Emergency Evacuation for the City of Atascadero. The purpose of this planning study is to provide strategies and action items to employ during fire and other natural disaster events to facilitate the evacuation of vehicles from selected zones in Atascadero. The focus of this analysis was to determine the following information:  Estimate evacuation time for groups of zones under various fire intrusion scenarios.  Determine time savings by operating roads with contraflow lanes.  Recommend traffic signal operational changes during evacuation.  Recommend locations where manual traffic control should be provided.  Identify road closure needs These efforts utilized information in the Zonehaven app which has already been initiated for the City. Disclaimer This document examines the simulation of three different fire evacuation scenarios which have been determined by the City of Atascadero Fire Department. Data for the evacuation zones were based on information provided by the Zonehaven mapping software and are disclosed in the report. These scenarios are intended to provide the City with some general strategies for assignment of personnel at key intersections and roadways during fire events. It is important that the City of Atascadero provide evacuation orders to the public as early as possible and to guide the evacuation on a zone-by-zone basis so that the evacuation can be spread over as much time as possible, thereby minimizing congestion and delay for its citizens. The City should communicate strategies to the public through several communication channels well in advance and also during the event so that evacuation does not occur en masse. Dissemination of evacuation orders is up to the City of Atascadero to implement and will need to be tailored to the specifics of any such event. The scenarios evaluated in this report are intended for guidance purposes and do not comprise a directive for any actual emergency. It should be acknowledged that evacuation during a fire or other emergency event can produce unexpected traffic patterns that cannot be predicted in advance. During fire events, traffic can be impacted by many factors such as the direction of the wind, the path of the fire, the number of firefighting responders, the volume of traffic during evacuation, the number of people that follow evacuation directions, unsafe traffic maneuvers and behavior by the public, driver visibility on evacuation routes, etc. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 102 of 217 2 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study for the City of Atascadero October 14, 2021 Study Area Zones and Scenarios Zonehaven Data Zonehaven is an on-line platform to assist communities with data and information for fire events. The City of Atascadero had Zonehaven map the City into zones. This zone system was used for the purposes of this traffic evaluation study. Figure 1 shows the Zonehaven zones for the City of Atascadero. As shown in Figure 1, there are a total of 27 evacuation zones within the City of Atascadero. The City selected a set of zones for evaculation under three different wildfire-related evacuation scenarios. Scenario A assumes that a westerly wind would cause fire to encroach the City from the west to east and require zones 3, 7, 8 to evacuate to the north and the south via US-101 and to the east via SR 41. Scenario B also predicts that a westerly wind would spread fire from the west to east and require zones 1, 2, and 4 to evacuate to the north and south via US 101 and to the east via SR 41. Scenario C presumes that the fire would encroach the City due to an easterly wind blowing from the east to the west and would require zones 15, 16, and 18 to evacuate to the north and south via US 101 and to the west via CA 41. These three scenarios are depicted in Figure 2. Scenario A  Zones 3, 7 and 8 (west side of 101)  Westerly wind, afternoon peak hour  Evacuation Destinations o Northbound 101 o Southbound 101 o Eastbound SR-41 Scenario B  Zones 1, 2 and 4 (west side of 101)  Westerly wind, afternoon peak hour  Evacuation Destinations o Northbound 101 o Southbound 101 o Eastbound SR-41 Scenario C  Zones 15, 16 and 18 (east side of 101)  Easterly wind, afternoon peak hour  Evacuation Destinations o Northbound 101 o Southbound 101 o Westbound SR-41 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 103 of 217 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study Figure 1 – Zonehaven Evacuation Zones ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 104 of 217 4 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study for the City of Atascadero October 14, 2021 Figure 2 Evacuation Zones in City of Atascadero As presented in Table 1, each of the evacuation zones were recorded with the number of structures, population, and estimated number of vehicles as provided in the Zonehaven app. As the evacuation zones in Scenario B and C are located near the urban core with higher densities, they consist of a substantially higher population as well as number of vehicles compared with zones in Scenario A, which are located in the rural edge of the City. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 105 of 217 5 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study for the City of Atascadero October 14, 2021 Table 1 – Evacuation Zone Summary Number of Structures Populations Number of Vehicles Scenario A Zone 3 398 443 796 Zone 7 177 432 354 Zone 8 415 563 830 Total 990 1,438 1,980 Scenario B Zone 1 660 1,023 1,200 Zone 2 850 1,564 1,700 Zone 4 531 826 1,062 Total 1,981 3,413 3,962 Scenario C Zone 15 570 977 1,140 Zone 16 830 1,801 1,660 Zone 18 1,006 2,497 2,012 Total 2,406 5,275 4,812 Source: Zonehaven, 2021 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 106 of 217 6 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study for the City of Atascadero October 14, 2021 Evacuation Routes The evacuation routes for zones under each scenario were identified by using Google Maps to choose the shortest travel time. It is noted that the evacuation routes were selected to start near the center of each zones and connect to the closest highway access point. Multiple routes for each zone/destination were utilized as much as possible. All of the individual travel paths assumed from each zone to each of the three evacuation destinations are included in Appendix A. Following is a summary for each evacuation scenario. As shown in the Figure 3, evacuation routes from zones 3, 7, and 8 under Scenario A would lead the traffic to several highway access points including Del Rio Road, San Anselmo Road, Traffic Way, Curbaril Avenue, and Santa Rosa Road along US 101 and Portola Road, San Gabriel Road, and Los Altos Road along SR 41. Figure 3 Evacuation Routes for Zones in Scenario A ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 107 of 217 7 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study for the City of Atascadero October 14, 2021 The evacuation routes for Scenario B are shown in Figure 4. Similarly, to Scenario A, the evacuating traffic from zones 1,2, and 4 under Scenario B were assumed to access the highways through connections with San Ramon Road, El Camino Real, Del Rio Road, San Anselmo Road, and Traffic Way along US 101 and Portola Road and San Gabriel Road along SR 41. Figure 4 Evacuation Routes for Zones in Scenario B ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 108 of 217 8 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study for the City of Atascadero October 14, 2021 The evacuation routes for Scenario C are shown in Figure 5. For Scenario C, the evacuating traffic from zones 15, 16, and 18 were assumed to access highways via Del Rio Road, San Anselmo Road, Rosario Avenue, Traffic Way, and El Camino Real along US 101 and Mercedes, and El Camino Real along SR 41. Figure 5 Evacuation Routes for Zones in Scenario C ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 109 of 217 9 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study for the City of Atascadero October 14, 2021 Traffic Operational Analysis Analysis Process The following process was used to estimate traffic volumes on evacuation routes and analyze the impact of the additional traffic flow:  Travel paths from each zone to each of the three evacuation destinations were determined. Where feasible, multiple paths were assumed for the same origin/destination path.  The total evacuating traffic volume for each zone was assumed to be the same number of vehicles recorded in the Zonehaven app zone.  All scenarios assumed that 75% of the evacuating traffic would be destined for US 101 and the remaining 25% would be destinated to SR41 (east or west depending on the wind direction)  The volume % by path was estimated assuming that traffic would spread evenly amongst all the paths as much as possible.  The resulting volume was recorded by specific turning movement at each of the key intersections along each route.  The City specified that fire events would be most likely in the afternoon, therefore, background traffic for key intersections on evacuation routes was assumed to be the weekday p.m. peak hour which is generally the peak traffic hour of the day.  Background traffic volumes were acquired from past traffic studies conducted over the last 5-6 years and were factored with an annual growth rate of 1.5 percent per year to represent a “normalized” (non-Covid) Year 2020 traffic volume. It should be noted that there was no data for some intersections.  Key intersections were then evaluated to determine their delay and Level of Service with the added traffic. This process is discussed below. The resulting traffic volume assignment data is included in Appendix B. Traffic Analysis Study Area The study area selected based on evacuation routes consists of the following intersections: 1. Del Rio Road/US101 SB Ramps 2. Del Rio Road/US101 NB Ramps 3. Del Rio Road/El Camino Real 4. San Anselmo Road/US101 SB Ramps 5. San Anselmo Road/US101 NB Ramps 6. San Anselmo Road/El Camino Real 7. Rosario Avenue-US101 NB On-Ramp/El Camino Real 8. Traffic Way/US101 SB Ramps 9. Traffic Way/US101 NB Off-Ramp 10. Traffic Way/El Camino Real ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 110 of 217 10 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study for the City of Atascadero October 14, 2021 11.SR 41/US101 SB Ramps 12.SR41/El Camino Real 13.US101 NB Ramps-Plaza Del Camino Driveway/El Camino Real 14.Santa Rosa Road/US101 SB Ramps 15.Santa Rosa Road/US101 NB On-Ramp-West Front Road 16.Santa Rosa Road/El Camino Real 17.SR41/San Gabriel Road 18.SR41/Santa Rosa Road 19.SR41/Portola Road 20.SR41/Curbaril Avenue 21.SR41/Atascadero Avenue Intersection Operations with Evacuation Operating conditions during the weekday p.m. peak period were evaluated to capture the highest potential impacts for the wildfire scenarios as well as the highest volumes on the local transportation network. The p.m. peak hour occurs between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. and typically reflects the highest level of congestion during the homeward-bound commute. Because winds are likely to pick up in the afternoon, increasing the wildfire threats, only afternoon peak period was evaluated. Each of the study intersections were examined to determine their delay and Level of Service (LOS) with the added traffic volumes from the various evacuation scenarios. Generally, intersection operations are graded based on their level of average delay and assigned a grade from LOS A (minor delay) to LOS F (significant delay). LOS D conditions are generally considered acceptable during peak hour conditions. As shown in Table 2, upon the addition of project-related traffic to the Existing volumes, the study intersections are identified which would be expected to experience excessive delay and longer queuing due to the added traffic. Therefore, these intersections with LOS E and F conditions were targeted for strategies to increase their capacity and decrease delay for evacuating traffic. These action items are discussed in the next section. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 111 of 217 11 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study for the City of Atascadero October 14, 2021 Table 2 –Intersection Analysis Study Intersection Approach Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C PM Peak PM Peak PM Peak LOS LOS LOS 1. Del Rio Rd/US 101 NB Ramps LOS F 2. Del Rio Rd/US 101 SB Ramps LOS F LOS E 3. Del Rio Rd/El Camino Real LOS E LOS F 4. San Anselmo Rd/US 101 NB Ramps LOS F LOS F NB (US 101 NB Off-Ramp) Approach LOS F 5. San Anselmo Rd/US 101 SB Ramps LOS F LOS F SB (US 101 SB Off-Ramp) Approach LOS F 6. San Anselmo Rd/El Camino Real LOS E LOS F 7. Rosario Ave-US 101 NB On-Ramp/El Camino Real 8. Traffic Wy/US 101 SB Ramps SB (US 101 SB Off-Ramp) Approach LOS F LOS F LOS F 9. Traffic Wy/US 101 NB Off-Ramp NB (US 101 NB Off-Ramp) Approach LOS F LOS F 10. Traffic Wy/El Camino Real LOS E LOS F LOS F 11. SR 41/US 101 SB Ramps 12. SR 41/El Camino Real LOS E LOS F LOS F 13. US 101 NB Ramps-Plaza Del Camino Driveway/El Camino Real 14. Santa Rosa Rd/US 101 SB Ramps 15. Santa Rosa Rd/US 101 NB On-Ramp-W Front Rd 16. Santa Rosa Rd/El Camino Real LOS E LOS E 17. SR 41/San Gabriel Rd LOS F 18. SR 41/Santa Rosa Rd NB (Santa Rosa Rd) Approach LOS F 19. SR 41/Portola Rd LOS F LOS F 20. SR 41/Curbaril Rd LOS F LOS E LOS F 21. SR 41/Atascadero Ave LOS F LOS F LOS F Notes: LOS = Level of Service More details on the intersection level of service analysis including calculation sheets for each of the study intersections under the three evaluation scenarios are included in Appendix C. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 112 of 217 12 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study for the City of Atascadero October 14, 2021 Traffic Recommendations Considerations & Evacuation Strategy The goal of any evacuation event is to move as much traffic as possible in the shortest amount of time. Generally, with mass evacuations, traffic delay can last for hours. It is assumed that any fire event will require residents to leave the immediate area of the City by using major regional routes such as US 101 and SR 41. Some traffic will seek back roads out of the area, but for the purposes of this evacuation analysis, it was assumed that all of the evacuating traffic would seek destinations to one of the three regional routes, north on US 101, south on US 101 and either west or east on SR 41. Following is a summary of the Strategy and Action Items to facilitate vehicle evaculation during fire or other natural disaster events. Strategy 1 – Increase vehicle capacity for evacuating traffic at US 101 interchanges. The City of Atascadero has the luxury of having eight interchanges with US 101. However, with the exception of the SR 41 interchange, most of these have low vehicle capacity due to the two-lane overpasses. Therefore, the action items that are recommended were structured to utilize as many interchanges as possible and to increase the capacity of these interchanges by eliminating off-ramp traffic and traffic from the side of the freeway that is not in peril. These closures would allow evacuating traffic to access the northbound or southbound ramps without any conflicts from other traffic competing for available capacity. Strategy 2 – Increase vehicle capacity at intersections projected to operate deficiently. Based on the intersection level of service analysis as well as the review of the evacuation trips, recommended actions such as closing roadways, modifying traffic signal operation, and providing manual traffic controls were made at selected intersections for each scenario. These action items are intended to favor capacity for evacuation routes and increase the capacity of the intersection and facilitate traffic flow during periods of increased traffic demand. Strategy 3 – Provide manual traffic control at all-way stop controlled intersections. There are a number of intersections on local residential and collector streets in Atascadero which are controlled by all-way Stops. An all-way stop controlled intersection is the lowest capacity traffic control device. Increased traffic demand on focused approaches will result in excessive queues due to the capacity profile. Action items are presented in the recommendations to provide manual traffic control at key all-way stop controlled intersections, especially at those intersections which are key outlets from residential neighborhoods. Additional Notes  The recommendations include a number of action items calling for manual traffic control by police and local City staff. A prioritized list of these intersections under each scenario are shown.  It should be noted that use of contra flow lanes (i.e., converting a two-lane two-way roadway to two-lane one- way) was considered, but dismissed due to the preponderance of two-lane roads and single lane access to US 101 ramps. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 113 of 217 13 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study for the City of Atascadero October 14, 2021  Information on the time to evacuate traffic was requested but cannot accurately be provided due to the level of complexity and unknown factors during an evaculation. Evaculation should start as early as possible to ensure the safety of local residents. Scenario A Evacuation Recommendations Following is a summary of the Action Items recommended for an evacuation that is typified by Scenario A. These action items are also depicted in Figure 6 including the priority list of manual traffic control locations. Del Rio Road Interchange  Close NB and SB Offramps  Close Del Rio Road (West of ECR)  Traffic Signals at interchange ramps go to flashing yellow. San Anselmo Road Interchange  Close NB and SB Offramps  Close San Anselmo Road (West of ECR)  Ramp intersections are uncontrolled, therefore, no changes would be needed since traffic would have free access onto freeway due to road closures.  San Anselmo Road/Monterey Road (all-way stop) - Provide manual traffic control. Santa Lucia Road/Portola Road  Provide manual traffic control at existing all-way stop. Traffic Way Interchange  Close NB and SB Offramps  Close Traffic Way (West of ECR)  All evacuation movements directed to US 101 SB on-ramp.  Santa Lucia Road/Ardilla Avenue (all-way stop) – Provide manual traffic control. SR41 Corridor  SR41/San Gabriel Road – Place traffic signal operation on flashing with manual traffic control  SR41/Portola Road - Place traffic signal operation on flashing with manual traffic control  SR41/Curbaril Avenue – Place traffic signal operation on flashing yellow for SR41 approaches and on flashing red for Curbaril Avenue approaches.  SR41/Atascadero Avenue - Place traffic signal operation on flashing yellow for SR41 approaches and on flashing red for Atascadero Avenue approaches. SR 41 Interchange  Close NB and SB Offramps  SR41/101 SB Ramps - Provide manual traffic control.  SR41/El Camino Avenue - Provide manual traffic control. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 114 of 217 14 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study for the City of Atascadero October 14, 2021 Curbaril Interchange  Close NB and SB Offramps  Close Curbaril Avenue (West of San Luis Avenue)  Provide manual traffic control at all-way stop controlled intersections of Curbaril Avenue/101 SB ramps, Curbaril Avenue/Cristobal Ave.-Marchant Ave., and Curbaril Avenue/Atascadero Avenue. Santa Rosa Road Interchange  Close NB and SB Offramps  Close Santa Rosa Road (West of ECR)  Close East Front Street (North of Montecito Avenue)  Traffic Signals at interchange ramps go to flashing yellow.  Provide manual traffic control at all-way stop controlled intersections of Santa Rosa Road/Atascadero Avenue and Portola Road/Atascadero Avenue US 101 Freeway  Coordinate with Caltrans and the California Highway Patrol to place the following changeable message signs: o NB - All Atascadero traffic exit at Santa Barbara Road Only o SB - All Atascadero traffic exit at San Ramon Road/Santa Cruz Road Only ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 115 of 217 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study Figure 6 – Scenario A Recommendations ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 116 of 217 16 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study for the City of Atascadero October 14, 2021 Scenario B Evacuation Recommendations Following is a summary of the Action Items recommended for an evacuation that is typified by Scenario B. These action items are also depicted in Figure 7 including the priority list of manual traffic control locations. Del Rio Road Interchange  Close NB and SB Offramps  Close Del Rio Road (West of ECR)  Traffic Signals at interchange ramps go to flashing yellow. San Anselmo Road Interchange  Close NB and SB Offramps  Close San Anselmo Road (West of ECR)  Ramp intersections are uncontrolled, therefore, no changes would be needed since traffic would have free access onto freeway due to road closures.  San Anselmo Road/Monterey Road (all-way stop) - Provide manual traffic control. Santa Lucia Road/Portola Road  Provide manual traffic control at existing all-way stop. Traffic Way Interchange  Close NB and SB Offramps  Close Traffic Way (West of ECR)  All evacuation movements directed to US 101 SB on-ramp.  Santa Lucia Road/Ardilla Avenue (all-way stop) – Provide manual traffic control. SR41 Corridor  SR41/San Gabriel Road – Place traffic signal operation on flashing with manual traffic control  SR41/Portola Road - Place traffic signal operation on flashing with manual traffic control  SR41/Curbaril Avenue – Place traffic signal operation on flashing yellow for SR41 approaches and on flashing red for Curbaril Avenue approaches.  SR41/Atascadero Avenue - Place traffic signal operation on flashing yellow for SR41 approaches and on flashing red for Atascadero Avenue approaches. SR 41 Interchange  Close NB and SB Offramps  SR41/101 SB Ramps - Provide manual traffic control.  SR41/El Camino Avenue - Provide manual traffic control. Curbaril Interchange  Close NB and SB Offramps ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 117 of 217 17 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study for the City of Atascadero October 14, 2021 US 101 Freeway  Coordinate with Caltrans and the California Highway Patrol to place the following changeable message signs: o NB - All Atascadero traffic exit at Santa Barbara Road Only o SB - All Atascadero traffic exit at San Ramon Road/Santa Cruz Road Only ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 118 of 217 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study Figure 7 – Scenario B Recommendations ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 119 of 217 19 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study for the City of Atascadero October 14, 2021 Scenario C Evacuation Recommendations Following is a summary of the Action Items recommended for an evacuation that is typified by Scenario C. These action items are also depicted in Figure 8 including the priority list of manual traffic control locations. Del Rio Road Interchange  Close NB and SB Offramps  Close Del Rio Road (West of 101 Ramps)  Traffic Signals at interchange ramps go to flashing yellow.  Del Rio Road/El Camino Real - Place traffic signal operation on flashing with manual traffic control San Anselmo Road Interchange  Close NB and SB Offramps  Close San Anselmo Road (West of 101 Ramps)  Ramp intersections are uncontrolled, therefore, no changes would be needed since traffic would have free access onto freeway due to road closures.  San Anselmo Road/El Camino Real - Place traffic signal operation on flashing with manual traffic control Traffic Way Interchange  Close NB and SB Offramps  Close Traffic Way (West of 101 Ramps)  All evacuation movements directed to US 101 SB on-ramp.  Traffic Way/El Camino Real - Place traffic signal operation on flashing with manual traffic control SR 41 Interchange  Close NB and SB Offramps  SR41/101 SB Ramps - Provide manual traffic control.  SR41/El Camino Avenue - Provide manual traffic control. Curbaril Interchange  Close NB and SB Offramps US 101 Freeway  Coordinate with Caltrans and the California Highway Patrol to place the following changeable message signs: o NB - All Atascadero traffic exit at Santa Barbara Road Only o SB - All Atascadero traffic exit at San Ramon Road/Santa Cruz Road Only ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 120 of 217 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study Figure 8 – Scenario C Recommendations ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1 Page 121 of 217 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study for the City of Atascadero October 2021 Appendix A Evacuation Routes & Paths ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 122 of 217 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study Figure A1 - Scenario A Zone 3 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 123 of 217 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study Figure A2 - Scenario A Zone 7 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 124 of 217 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study Figure A3 - Scenario A Zone 8 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 125 of 217 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study Figure B1 - Scenario B Zone 1 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 126 of 217 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study Figure B2 – Scenario B Zone 2 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 127 of 217 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study Figure B3 – Scenario B Zone 4 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 128 of 217 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study Figure C1 – Scenario C Zone 15 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 129 of 217 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study Figure C2 – Scenario C Zone 16 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 130 of 217 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study Figure C3 – Scenario C Zone 18 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 131 of 217 ii Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study for the City of Atascadero October 8, 2021 Appendix B Traffic Volume Estimates ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 132 of 217 Scenario A Routes and Traffic VolumesDestination Route # (see maps)Total Distance (Miles)Total Time (Minutes)%No. of VehiclesDirection Street Direction Street Direction Street Direction Street Direction Street Direction Street Direction StreetZone 3101 N @ San Anselmo Rd 24.1 818 143SE Santa Lucia North Portola Rd East Ardilla Ave NE San Anselmo Rd North US‐101101 N @ Del Rio Rd 14.8 1017 135SE Santa Lucia NE Santa Ana Rd NE Graves Creek Rd/San Benito Rd North Monterey Rd East Del Rio Rd North US‐101101 S @ San Anselmo Rd 248864SE Santa Lucia North Portola Rd East Ardilla Ave NE San Anselmo Rd South US‐101101 S @ Traffic Way33.9 812 96SE Santa Lucia South US‐101101 S @ CA‐41 45.4 1420 159SE Santa Lucia South Portola Rd East CA‐41 South US‐101SR 41 E @ El Camino Real 56.3 1125199SE Santa Lucia South El Camino Real East CA‐41100 796Zone 7101 N @ CA‐41 26.1 1418 64SE San Marcos Rd SE Los Altos Rd East CA‐41 North US‐101101 N @ Curbaril 16.5 1417 60SE San Marcos Rd SE Los Altos Rd East CA‐41 East Curbaril Ave North US‐101101 S @ CA‐41 26.1 1420 71SE San Marcos Rd SE Los Altos Rd East CA‐41 South US‐101101 S @ Santa Rosa Rd 35.2 1220 71SE San Marcos Rd East CA‐41 East Santa Rosa Road South US‐101SR 41 E @ Los Altos Rd 41.4 52589SE San Marcos Rd SE Los Altos Rd East CA‐41100 354Zone 8101 N @ San Anselmo Rd 24.1 918 149NE Escondido Rd North San Gabriel Rd East Santa Lucia Rd North Portola Rd North San Anselmo Rd North US‐101101 N @ Del Rio Rd 13.9 1017 141NE Escondido Rd North San Gabriel Rd North Santa Ana Rd North Graves Creek Rd North Monterey Rd East Del Rio North US‐101101 S @ Santa Rosa Rd 43.6 920 166NE San Marcos Rd NE Monita Rd SE San Gabriel Rd East CA‐41 South Santa Rosa Rd South US‐101101 S @ CA‐41 33.6 1220 166NE San Marcos Rd NE Monita Rd SE San Gabriel Rd East CA‐41 South US‐101SR 41 E @ El Camino Real 5 3.5 1210 83NE Escondido Rd North San Gabriel Rd East Santa Lucia Rd South El Camino Real East CA‐41SR 41 E @ San Gabriel61.9 515125SE San Marcos Rd South San Gabriel Rd East CA‐41100 830Step 7Westerly WindStep 6Starting Point: San Marcos Rd at Escondido RdStarting Point: Santa Lucia Rd at Lomitas RdStarting Point: 12040 San Marcos RdStep 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5ITEM NUMBER: C-2DATE: 10/26/21ATTACHMENT: 1APage 133 of 217 Turning Movement Volume: Summary 7/13/2021Report File: N:\...\Scenario A Intersections.pdf Scenario 1 Scenario AVistro File: N:\...\ATA038.ProjectVolume.vistro 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound El Camino Real/Rosario Ave- US NB On-Ramp7 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru Southbound 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound San Anselmo Rd/El Camino Real6 Intersection NameID 293 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 293 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound San Anselmo Rd/US101 NB Ramps5 Intersection NameID 357 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 64 Right 293 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound San Anselmo Rd/US101 SB Ramps4 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Del Rio Rd/El Camino Real3 Intersection NameID 276 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 276 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Del Rio Rd/US 101 NB Ramp2 Intersection NameID 276 Total Volume 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 276 Thru Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Left Northbound Del Rio Rd/US 101 SB Ramp1 Intersection NameID Scenario A Project Trips Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 134 of 217 60 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 60 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Curbaril Ave/US 101 NB Ramps15 Intersection NameID 60 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 60 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Curbaril Ave/US 101 SB Ramps14 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound El Camino Real/US 101 NB Ramps (S of Atascadero)13 Intersection NameID 297 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 214 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 83 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/El Camino Real12 Intersection NameID 673 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 395 Right 278 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR41/US 101 SB Ramps11 Intersection NameID 282 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 83 Right 199 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Traffic Wy/El Camino Real10 Intersection NameID 282 Total Volume 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 282 Thru Eastbound 0 Right 0 Left Northbound Traffic Wy/US 101 NB Off- Ramp9 Intersection NameID 378 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 96 Right 282 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Traffic Wy/US 101 SB Ramps8 Intersection NameID Scenario A Project Trips Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 135 of 217 733 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 574 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 159 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Portola Rd23 Intersection NameID 810 Total Volume 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 236 Right 574 Thru Eastbound 0 Right 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Santa Rosa Rd22 Intersection NameID 810 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 354 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 456 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/San Gabriel Rd21 Intersection NameID 354 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru Westbound 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 354 Left Southbound SR 41/Los Altos Rd20 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Santa Rosa Rd/El Camino Real19 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Santa Rosa Rd/US 101 NB Ramps18 Intersection NameID 237 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 166 Right 71 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Santa Rosa Rd/US 101 SB Ramps17 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Curbaril Ave/El Camino Real16 Intersection NameID Scenario A Project Trips Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 136 of 217 496 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 297 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 199 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Mercedes Ave26 Intersection NameID 673 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 673 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/ Atascadero Ave25 Intersection NameID 733 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 60 Right 673 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Curbaril Ave24 Intersection NameID Scenario A Project Trips Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 137 of 217 Scenario B Routes and Traffic VolumesDestination Route # (see maps)Total Distance (Miles)Total Time (Minutes)%No. of VehiclesDirection Street Direction Street Direction Street Direction Street Direction Street Direction StreetZone 1101 N @ Del Rio Rd21.3 425 300East Del Rio Rd North US‐101101 N @ San Ramon Rd 12.5 620 240East Del Rio Rd North San Ramon Rd North US‐101101 S @ Del Rio Rd21.3 335 420East Del Rio Rd South US‐101SR 41 E @ CA‐101 34620240East Del Rio Rd South US‐101 East CA‐41100 1200Zone 2101 N @ Del Rio Rd11.6 420 340East Graves Creek Rd North Monterey Rd East Del Rio Rd North US‐101101 N @ San Anselmo Rd21.1 320 340East Graves Creek Rd South Monterey Rd East San Anselmo Rd North US‐101101 S @ San Anselmo Rd21.1 340 680East Graves Creek Rd South Monterey Rd East San Anselmo Rd South US‐101SR 41 E @ CA‐101 43.9 1020340East Graves Creek Rd South Monterey Rd East San Anselmo Rd South US‐101 East CA‐41100 1700Zone 4101 N @ San Anselmo Rd11.9 5 15159East Santa Lucia Rd North Portola Rd East Ardilla Rd North San Anselmo Rd North US‐101101 N @ San Anselmo Rd22.3 610 106East Santa Lucia Rd North Chaupline Ave North Vernado Ave West Ardilla Rd North San Anselmo Rd North US‐101101 N @ Rosario Ave 32.6 610 106East Santa Lucia Rd East Traffic Way North El Camino Real West Rosario Ave North US‐101101 S @ Traffic Way 42.2 440 425East Santa Lucia Rd North Ardilla Ave East Traffic Way South US‐101SR 41 E @ El Camino Real52.3 525266East Santa Lucia Rd South El Camino Real East CA‐41Westerly WindStarting Point: Del Rio Rd at La Canada LnStarting Point: Graves Creek Rd at Balboa RdStarting Point: Santa Lucia Rd at Cascabel RdStep 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6ITEM NUMBER: C-2DATE: 10/26/21ATTACHMENT: 1APage 138 of 217 Turning Movement Volume: Summary 7/6/2021Report File: N:\...\Scenario B Intersections.pdf Scenario 2 Scenario BVistro File: N:\...\ATA038.ProjectVolume.vistro 106 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 106 Left Northbound El Camino Real/Rosario Ave- US NB On-Ramp7 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru Southbound 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound San Anselmo Rd/El Camino Real6 Intersection NameID 606 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 606 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound San Anselmo Rd/US101 NB Ramps5 Intersection NameID 1626 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 1020 Right 606 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound San Anselmo Rd/US101 SB Ramps4 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Del Rio Rd/El Camino Real3 Intersection NameID 640 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 640 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Del Rio Rd/US 101 NB Ramp2 Intersection NameID 1300 Total Volume 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 660 Right 640 Thru Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Left Northbound Del Rio Rd/US 101 SB Ramp1 Intersection NameID Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 139 of 217 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Curbaril Ave/US 101 NB Ramps15 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Curbaril Ave/US 101 SB Ramps14 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound El Camino Real/US 101 NB Ramps (S of Atascadero)13 Intersection NameID 606 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 340 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 266 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/El Camino Real12 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR41/US 101 SB Ramps11 Intersection NameID 612 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 266 Right 240 Thru 106 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Traffic Wy/El Camino Real10 Intersection NameID 612 Total Volume 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 612 Thru Eastbound 0 Right 0 Left Northbound Traffic Wy/US 101 NB Off- Ramp9 Intersection NameID 796 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 424 Right 372 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Traffic Wy/US 101 SB Ramps8 Intersection NameID Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 140 of 217 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Portola Rd23 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru Eastbound 0 Right 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Santa Rosa Rd22 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/San Gabriel Rd21 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru Westbound 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Left Southbound SR 41/Los Altos Rd20 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Santa Rosa Rd/El Camino Real19 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Santa Rosa Rd/US 101 NB Ramps18 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Santa Rosa Rd/US 101 SB Ramps17 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Curbaril Ave/El Camino Real16 Intersection NameID Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 141 of 217 240 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 240 Thru 0 Left Northbound San Ramon Rd/US 101 SB Ramp (N of Atascadero)28 Intersection NameID 240 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 240 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound El Camino Real/US 101 NB (N of Atascadero)27 Intersection NameID 846 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 606 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 240 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Mercedes Ave26 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/ Atascadero Ave25 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Curbaril Ave24 Intersection NameID Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 142 of 217 Scenario C Routes and Traffic VolumesDestination Route # (see maps)Total Distance (Miles)Total Time (Minutes)%No. of VehiclesDirection Street Direction Street Direction Street Direction Street Direction Street Direction StreetZone 15101 S @ San Asnselmo Rd 31.4 420 228West San Benito Rd South El Camino Real West San Anselmo Rd South US‐101101 S @ San Asnselmo Rd 41.4 520 228South Colima Rd SW San Anselmo Rd South El Camino Real West San Anselmo Rd South US‐101101 N @ Del Rio Rd 21325 285West San Benito Rd North El Camino Real West Del Rio Rd North US‐101101 N @ San Ramon Rd 12.1 415 171West San Benito Rd North El Camino Real West San Ramon Rd North US‐101SR 41 W @ Portola Rd 53.8 710 114West San Benito Rd South El Camino Real West San Anselmo Rd South Portola Rd West CA‐41SR 41 W @ CA‐10162.8 710114West San Benito Rd South El Camino Real West San Anselmo Rd South US‐101 West CA‐41100 1140Zone 16101 N @ San Asnselmo Rd 32.7 418 299West Dolores Ave West San Anselmo Rd South El Camino Real West San Anselmo Rd North US‐101101 N @ Del Rio Rd 12.3 410 166West Dolores Ave North El Camino Real West Del Rio Rd North US‐101101 N @ Del Rio Rd 22.4 610 166West Dolores Ave NE San Anselmo Rd NW Del Rio Rd North US‐101101 S @ San Anselmo Rd 31.1 421 349West Dolores Ave South El Camino Real West San Anselmo Rd South US‐101101 S @ San Asnselmo Rd 41.8 620 332East Dolores Ave SW San Jacinto Ave North El Camino Real West San Anselmo Rd South US‐101SR 41 W @ San Anselmo Rd 52.4 68 133West Dolores Ave West San Anselmo Rd South El Camino Real West San Anselmo Rd South US‐101 West CA‐41SR 41 W @ El Camino Real62.3 67116West Dolores Ave South El Camino Real West CA‐41SR 41 W @ Portola Rd 73.7 96100West Dolores Ave West San Anselmo Rd South El Camino Real West San Anselmo Rd South Portola Rd West CA‐41100 1660Zone 18101 N @ Rosario Ave 20.7 320 402West Rosario Ave North US‐101101 N @ San Anselmo Rd 11.1 415 302South Bajada Ave SW Dulzura Ave West Nogales Ave West San Jacinto Ave North El Camino Real North US‐101101 S @ Traffic Way 31440 805South Bajada Ave SW Traffic Way South US‐101SR 41 W @ El Camino Real 41.3 425503West Rosario Ave South El Camino Real West CA‐41100 2012Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6Easterly WindStarting Point: San Benito Rd at Colima RdStarting Point: Dolores Ave at Curvado CircleStarting Point: Bajada Ave at Rosario AveStep 1ITEM NUMBER: C-2DATE: 10/26/21ATTACHMENT: 1APage 143 of 217 Turning Movement Volume: Summary 7/6/2021Report File: N:\...\Scenario C Intersections.pdf Scenario 3 Scenario CVistro File: N:\...\ATA038.ProjectVolume.vistro 1010 Total Volume 0 Right 402 Thru 503 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 105 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound El Camino Real/Rosario Ave- US NB On-Ramp7 Intersection NameID 2209 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Left Eastbound 1584 Right 0 Thru Southbound 0 Thru 625 Left Northbound San Anselmo Rd/El Camino Real6 Intersection NameID 2209 Total Volume 601 Right 1608 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound San Anselmo Rd/US101 NB Ramps5 Intersection NameID 1469 Total Volume 0 Right 196 Thru 1273 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound San Anselmo Rd/US101 SB Ramps4 Intersection NameID 788 Total Volume 0 Right 166 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 171 Thru 451 Left Northbound Del Rio Rd/El Camino Real3 Intersection NameID 617 Total Volume 617 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Del Rio Rd/US 101 NB Ramp2 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Left Northbound Del Rio Rd/US 101 SB Ramp1 Intersection NameID Scenario C Project Trips Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 144 of 217 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Curbaril Ave/US 101 NB Ramps15 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Curbaril Ave/US 101 SB Ramps14 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound El Camino Real/US 101 NB Ramps (S of Atascadero)13 Intersection NameID 608 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 608 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/El Camino Real (S of Atascadero)12 Intersection NameID 884 Total Volume 0 Right 884 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR41/US 101 SB Ramps11 Intersection NameID 1413 Total Volume 0 Right 805 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 608 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Traffic Wy/El Camino Real10 Intersection NameID 805 Total Volume 805 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru Eastbound 0 Right 0 Left Northbound Traffic Wy/US 101 NB Off- Ramp9 Intersection NameID 805 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 805 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Traffic Wy/US 101 SB Ramps8 Intersection NameID Scenario C Project Trips Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 145 of 217 1080 Total Volume 0 Right 884 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 196 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Portola Rd23 Intersection NameID 1080 Total Volume 1080 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru Eastbound 0 Right 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Santa Rosa Rd22 Intersection NameID 1080 Total Volume 0 Right 1080 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/San Gabriel Rd21 Intersection NameID 1080 Total Volume 0 Right 1080 Thru Westbound 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Left Southbound SR 41/Los Altos Rd20 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Santa Rosa Rd/El Camino Real19 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Santa Rosa Rd/US 101 NB Ramps18 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Santa Rosa Rd/US 101 SB Ramps17 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Curbaril Ave/El Camino Real16 Intersection NameID Scenario C Project Trips Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 146 of 217 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound San Ramon Rd/US 101 SB Ramp (N of Atascadero)28 Intersection NameID 171 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 171 Left Northbound El Camino Real/US 101 NB (N of Atascadero)27 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Mercedes Ave26 Intersection NameID 884 Total Volume 0 Right 884 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/ Atascadero Ave25 Intersection NameID 884 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 884 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Curbaril Ave24 Intersection NameID Scenario C Project Trips Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 147 of 217 Turning Movement Volume: Summary 7/13/2021Report File: N:\...\Scenario A Intersections.pdf Scenario 1 Scenario AVistro File: N:\...\ATA038.ProjectVolume.vistro 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound El Camino Real/Rosario Ave- US NB On-Ramp7 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru Southbound 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound San Anselmo Rd/El Camino Real6 Intersection NameID 293 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 293 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound San Anselmo Rd/US101 NB Ramps5 Intersection NameID 357 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 64 Right 293 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound San Anselmo Rd/US101 SB Ramps4 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Del Rio Rd/El Camino Real3 Intersection NameID 276 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 276 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Del Rio Rd/US 101 NB Ramp2 Intersection NameID 276 Total Volume 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 276 Thru Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Left Northbound Del Rio Rd/US 101 SB Ramp1 Intersection NameID Scenario A Project Trips Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 148 of 217 60 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 60 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Curbaril Ave/US 101 NB Ramps15 Intersection NameID 60 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 60 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Curbaril Ave/US 101 SB Ramps14 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound El Camino Real/US 101 NB Ramps (S of Atascadero)13 Intersection NameID 297 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 214 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 83 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/El Camino Real12 Intersection NameID 673 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 395 Right 278 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR41/US 101 SB Ramps11 Intersection NameID 282 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 83 Right 199 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Traffic Wy/El Camino Real10 Intersection NameID 282 Total Volume 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 282 Thru Eastbound 0 Right 0 Left Northbound Traffic Wy/US 101 NB Off- Ramp9 Intersection NameID 378 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 96 Right 282 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Traffic Wy/US 101 SB Ramps8 Intersection NameID Scenario A Project Trips Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 149 of 217 733 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 574 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 159 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Portola Rd23 Intersection NameID 810 Total Volume 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 236 Right 574 Thru Eastbound 0 Right 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Santa Rosa Rd22 Intersection NameID 810 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 354 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 456 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/San Gabriel Rd21 Intersection NameID 354 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru Westbound 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 354 Left Southbound SR 41/Los Altos Rd20 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Santa Rosa Rd/El Camino Real19 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Santa Rosa Rd/US 101 NB Ramps18 Intersection NameID 237 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 166 Right 71 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Santa Rosa Rd/US 101 SB Ramps17 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Curbaril Ave/El Camino Real16 Intersection NameID Scenario A Project Trips Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 150 of 217 496 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 297 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 199 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Mercedes Ave26 Intersection NameID 673 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 673 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/ Atascadero Ave25 Intersection NameID 733 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 60 Right 673 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Curbaril Ave24 Intersection NameID Scenario A Project Trips Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 151 of 217 Emergency Evacuation Traffic Planning Study for the City of Atascadero October 2021 Appendix C Intersection Level of Service Calculations ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 152 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: US 101 SB Ramps & Del Rio Road 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 389 60 145 135 0000232091 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 389 60 145 135 0000232091 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000 000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 418 65 156 145 0 249 0 98 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, %022220 222 Cap, veh/h 0 682 106 358 267 0 451 0 401 Arrive On Green 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 1580 246 330 619 0 1781 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 483 301 0 0 249 0 98 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 0 1826 949 0 0 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 5.2 2.7 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 1.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 5.2 7.9 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 1.2 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.13 0.52 0.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 0 788 625 0 0 451 0 401 V/C Ratio(X)0.00 0.00 0.61 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.24 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 0 1153 868 0 0 1125 0 1001 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 5.6 6.1 0.0 0.0 8.2 0.0 7.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.6 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 6.3 6.7 0.0 0.0 9.3 0.0 7.8 LnGrp LOS AAAAAA AAA Approach Vol, veh/h 483 301 347 Approach Delay, s/veh 6.3 6.7 8.9 Approach LOS A A A Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.9 10.4 14.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 16.0 16.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.2 5.1 9.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.0 1.3 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.2 HCM 6th LOS A ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 153 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2: US 101 NB Ramps & Del Rio Road 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 343 292 0 0 180 193 79 0 162 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 343 292 0 0 180 193 79 0 162 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 0 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 373 317 0 0 196 210 86 0 176 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, %220022222 Cap, veh/h 453 276 0 0 444 476 345 0 307 Arrive On Green 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.19 0.00 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 496 514 0 0 826 885 1781 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 690 0000406860176 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1011 00001711 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 1.2 0.0 3.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 1.2 0.0 3.0 Prop In Lane 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.52 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 730 00009203450307 V/C Ratio(X) 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.25 0.00 0.57 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 730 00009209580852 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 10.2 0.0 10.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 21.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.0 1.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 10.5 0.0 12.6 LnGrp LOS C AAAAABAB Approach Vol, veh/h 690 406 262 Approach Delay, s/veh 30.7 4.5 11.9 Approach LOS C A B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.8 20.0 20.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 16.0 16.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.0 18.0 6.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 0.0 1.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.2 HCM 6th LOS B ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 154 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 3: El Camino Real & Del Rio Road 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 82 82 267 21 91 9 226 117 20 14 99 55 Future Volume (veh/h) 82 82 267 21 91 9 226 117 20 14 99 55 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 85 85 275 22 94 9 233 121 21 14 102 57 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222 Cap, veh/h 233 200 324 109 299 25 269 939 796 118 470 263 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.15 0.50 0.50 0.07 0.42 0.41 Sat Flow, veh/h 641 980 1585 142 1464 125 1781 1870 1585 1781 1127 630 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 170 0 275 125 0 0 233 121 21 14 0 159 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1620 0 1585 1730 0 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1757 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 0.0 8.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 1.8 0.4 0.4 0.0 3.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.5 0.0 8.8 3.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 1.8 0.4 0.4 0.0 3.1 Prop In Lane 0.50 1.00 0.18 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 433 0 324 433 0 0 269 939 796 118 0 733 V/C Ratio(X) 0.39 0.00 0.85 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.13 0.03 0.12 0.00 0.22 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 917 0 826 945 0 0 338 939 796 135 0 733 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.4 0.0 20.2 17.9 0.0 0.0 21.9 7.0 6.6 23.2 0.0 9.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 2.4 0.5 0.0 0.0 14.9 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.7 0.0 3.2 1.3 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 18.6 0.0 22.7 18.4 0.0 0.0 36.8 7.3 6.7 23.3 0.0 10.6 LnGrp LOS B A C B A A D A A C A B Approach Vol, veh/h 445 125 375 173 Approach Delay, s/veh 21.1 18.4 25.6 11.6 Approach LOS C B C B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.5 30.5 14.8 12.0 26.0 14.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 4.5 26.0 28.0 10.5 20.0 28.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 3.8 10.8 8.7 5.1 5.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.7 0.5 0.0 0.7 0.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.8 HCM 6th LOS C ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 155 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: El Camino Real & San Anselmo Rd 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 336 26 153 7 20 0 241 217 21 6 200 240 Future Volume (veh/h) 336 26 153 7 20 0 241 217 21 6 200 240 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 357 28 163 7 21 0 256 231 22 6 213 255 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222 Cap, veh/h 399 31 381 94 281 0 293 1142 108 11 674 293 Arrive On Green 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.16 0.35 0.35 0.01 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 1657 130 1585 462 1385 0 1781 3281 310 1781 3554 1546 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 385 0 163 28 0 0 256 124 129 6 213 255 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1787 0 1585 1847 0 0 1781 1777 1814 1781 1777 1546 Q Serve(g_s), s 16.5 0.0 6.9 1.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 3.9 3.9 0.3 4.1 12.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.5 0.0 6.9 1.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 3.9 3.9 0.3 4.1 12.6 Prop In Lane 0.93 1.00 0.25 0.00 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 430 0 381 374 0 0 293 618 631 11 674 293 V/C Ratio(X) 0.90 0.00 0.43 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.20 0.20 0.54 0.32 0.87 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 430 0 381 374 0 0 293 618 631 90 720 313 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.0 0.0 25.4 25.5 0.0 0.0 32.2 18.0 18.1 39.1 27.6 31.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 23.8 0.0 3.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 23.9 0.2 0.2 35.0 0.3 21.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 9.7 0.0 2.7 0.5 0.0 0.0 6.4 1.5 1.5 0.2 1.6 6.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 52.8 0.0 28.9 25.9 0.0 0.0 56.1 18.2 18.2 74.1 27.8 52.3 LnGrp LOS D A C C AAEBBECD Approach Vol, veh/h 548 28 509 474 Approach Delay, s/veh 45.7 25.9 37.3 41.6 Approach LOS DCDD Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 17.0 19.0 20.0 4.5 31.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 13.0 16.0 16.0 4.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 18.5 13.1 14.6 3.0 2.3 5.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 41.3 HCM 6th LOS D ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 156 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 10: El Camino Real & Traffic Way 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 5 HCM 6th Edition methodology cannot be performed with phasing conflicts. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 157 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: US 101 SB Ramps & SR 41 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 6 HCM 6th Edition methodology supports speed limit in the range of 25 to 55 mph. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 158 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 12: El Camino Real & SR 41 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 197 532 458 179 253 107 198 438 291 195 322 99 Future Volume (veh/h) 197 532 458 179 253 107 198 438 291 195 322 99 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1841 1856 1856 1841 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 205 554 477 186 264 111 206 456 303 203 335 103 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, %343343333333 Cap, veh/h 358 673 1231 215 934 382 271 830 359 190 931 408 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.37 0.37 0.12 0.39 0.39 0.08 0.24 0.24 0.11 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 3428 1841 2768 1767 2418 989 3428 3526 1526 1767 3526 1546 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 205 554 477 186 189 186 206 456 303 203 335 103 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1714 1841 1384 1767 1749 1658 1714 1763 1526 1767 1763 1546 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.6 31.7 13.4 12.0 8.6 9.0 6.8 13.2 22.0 12.5 9.0 4.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.6 31.7 13.4 12.0 8.6 9.0 6.8 13.2 22.0 12.5 9.0 4.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 358 673 1231 215 675 640 271 830 359 190 931 408 V/C Ratio(X) 0.57 0.82 0.39 0.87 0.28 0.29 0.76 0.55 0.84 1.07 0.36 0.25 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 358 673 1231 259 675 640 458 942 408 190 931 408 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.74 0.74 0.74 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 49.5 33.4 21.6 50.0 24.5 24.6 52.3 39.0 42.3 51.7 34.7 17.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.6 8.3 0.7 22.2 1.0 1.1 4.4 0.6 13.6 83.8 0.3 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.9 15.3 4.4 6.6 3.7 3.7 3.1 5.7 9.5 9.9 3.8 2.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 51.1 41.7 22.3 72.2 25.5 25.8 56.7 39.5 55.9 135.6 35.0 18.2 LnGrp LOS D D C E C C E D E F C B Approach Vol, veh/h 1236 561 965 641 Approach Delay, s/veh 35.8 41.1 48.3 64.1 Approach LOS D D D E Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.1 47.0 12.7 37.2 16.7 49.4 16.0 33.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 4.6 3.5 6.6 4.6 * 4.6 3.5 * 6.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.0 37.8 15.5 26.0 11.5 * 45 12.5 * 31 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.0 33.7 8.8 11.0 8.6 11.0 14.5 24.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 2.1 0.3 2.5 0.2 2.3 0.0 2.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 45.6 HCM 6th LOS D Notes * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 159 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 13: El Camino Real & US 101 NB Ramps /Plaza Del Camino Driveway 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)000000000000 Future Volume (veh/h)000000000000 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 000000000000 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222 Cap, veh/h 0 748 0 748 634 160 1421 0 160 1421 Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 1870 1585 0 1870 1585 1781 3647 0 1781 3647 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 000000000000 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1870 1585 0 1870 1585 1781 1777 0 1781 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 748 0 748 634 160 1421 0 160 1421 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 748 0 748 634 160 1421 0 160 1421 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A AAAAAAAA Approach Vol, veh/h 0 A 0 0 0 A Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS Timer - Assigned Phs 2468 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 0.0 HCM 6th LOS A Notes Unsignalized Delay for [EBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 160 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: US 101 South Ramp & Santa Rosa 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 2 279 183 102 307 121 0 0 0 320 14 77 Future Volume (veh/h) 2 279 183 102 307 121 0 0 0 320 14 77 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000 000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 2 303 199 111 334 132 348 15 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222 222 Cap, veh/h 91 391 256 192 377 137 735 32 Arrive On Green 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.43 0.43 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1 1057 691 228 1020 370 1711 74 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 504 0 0 577 0 0 363 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1750 0 0 1618 0 0 1785 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.2 0.0 0.0 12.2 0.0 0.0 5.8 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.39 0.19 0.23 0.96 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 738 0 0 706 0 0 767 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 790 0 0 751 0 0 767 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 11.2 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 0.0 8.2 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 0.0 0.0 5.8 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.4 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 13.4 0.0 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 10.3 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS BAABAA BA Approach Vol, veh/h 504 577 363 A Approach Delay, s/veh 13.4 10.5 10.3 Approach LOS B B B Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.8 21.2 18.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 16.0 16.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.2 7.8 14.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.9 1.0 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.4 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 161 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: East Front Road/US 101 North Ramp & Santa Rosa 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 72 396 78 8 332 337 193 171 76 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 72 396 78 8 332 337 193 171 76 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 78 430 85 9 361 366 210 186 83 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222 Cap, veh/h 152 484 89 97 741 634 311 276 123 Arrive On Green 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 Sat Flow, veh/h 126 1210 223 13 1853 1585 779 690 308 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 593 0 0 370 0 366 479 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1559 0 0 1866 0 1585 1776 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.2 8.9 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.7 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 7.2 8.9 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.13 0.14 0.02 1.00 0.44 0.17 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 726 0 0 839 0 634 710 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.58 0.67 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 726 0 0 839 0 634 710 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.60 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 11.4 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 9.4 9.9 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.8 5.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.7 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 1.9 3.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 16.8 0.0 0.0 9.2 0.0 10.1 14.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS BAAAABBAA Approach Vol, veh/h 593 736 479 Approach Delay, s/veh 16.8 9.7 14.9 Approach LOS B A B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.0 20.0 20.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 16.0 16.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.9 16.7 9.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.0 0.0 2.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.4 HCM 6th LOS B ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 162 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 16: El Camino Real & Santa Rosa Road 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 11 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 219 4 309 4 25 19 412 681 4 9 617 309 Future Volume (veh/h) 219 4 309 4 25 19 412 681 4 9 617 309 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 231 4 325 4 26 20 434 717 4 9 649 325 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222 Cap, veh/h 336 6 620 8 50 39 356 1881 10 20 1174 509 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.20 0.52 0.52 0.01 0.33 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 1752 30 1583 139 902 694 1781 3623 20 1781 3554 1540 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 235 0 325 50 0 0 434 352 369 9 649 325 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1783 0 1583 1734 0 0 1781 1777 1866 1781 1777 1540 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.0 0.0 14.1 2.5 0.0 0.0 18.0 10.7 10.7 0.5 13.5 16.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.0 0.0 14.1 2.5 0.0 0.0 18.0 10.7 10.7 0.5 13.5 16.1 Prop In Lane 0.98 1.00 0.08 0.40 1.00 0.01 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 342 0 620 96 0 0 356 923 969 20 1174 509 V/C Ratio(X) 0.69 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.00 1.22 0.38 0.38 0.45 0.55 0.64 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 475 0 739 96 0 0 356 923 969 99 1174 509 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.36 0.00 0.36 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 33.9 0.0 21.0 41.3 0.0 0.0 36.0 13.0 13.0 44.2 24.7 25.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.1 2.3 0.0 0.0 121.1 1.2 1.1 5.8 1.9 6.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.7 0.0 5.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 19.6 4.3 4.5 0.2 5.8 6.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.2 0.0 21.0 43.6 0.0 0.0 157.1 14.2 14.1 50.0 26.6 31.6 LnGrp LOS C A C D A A F B B D C C Approach Vol, veh/h 560 50 1155 983 Approach Delay, s/veh 26.6 43.6 67.8 28.4 Approach LOS C D E C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 34.7 22.3 6.0 51.7 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 23.0 24.0 5.0 36.0 5.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 20.0 18.1 16.1 2.5 12.7 4.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.2 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 44.9 HCM 6th LOS D ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 163 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 17: San Gabriel Road & SR 41 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 12 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 18 321 28 86 306 84 9 9 41 393 18 9 Future Volume (veh/h) 18 321 28 86 306 84 9 9 41 393 18 9 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1796 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 19 338 29 91 322 88 9 9 43 414 19 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, %272272222222 Cap, veh/h 163 525 45 122 406 111 126 133 437 603 22 10 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.32 0.32 0.07 0.30 0.30 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1631 140 1781 1358 371 139 366 1207 1312 60 29 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 19 0 367 91 0 410 61 0 0 442 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1771 1781 0 1729 1712 0 0 1401 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 0.0 9.7 2.7 0.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.6 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 0.0 9.7 2.7 0.0 11.9 1.3 0.0 0.0 15.9 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.21 0.15 0.70 0.94 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 163 0 570 122 0 517 696 0 0 635 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.12 0.00 0.64 0.75 0.00 0.79 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 212 0 1168 440 0 1362 906 0 0 817 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.8 0.0 15.8 25.0 0.0 17.6 11.5 0.0 0.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 1.2 10.3 0.0 2.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.2 0.0 3.3 1.4 0.0 4.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 23.1 0.0 17.0 35.3 0.0 20.4 11.6 0.0 0.0 17.8 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A B D A C BAABAA Approach Vol, veh/h 386 501 61 442 Approach Delay, s/veh 17.3 23.1 11.6 17.8 Approach LOS B C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.2 23.6 23.8 8.5 22.3 23.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 6.0 4.0 3.5 6.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.5 36.0 27.0 6.5 43.0 27.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.7 11.7 17.9 2.5 13.9 3.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 2.0 1.8 0.0 2.4 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.3 HCM 6th LOS B ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 164 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 19: Portola Road & SR 41 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 13 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 57 990 318 46 390 17 44 26 41 11 46 29 Future Volume (veh/h) 57 990 318 46 390 17 44 26 41 11 46 29 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1796 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 59 1031 331 48 406 18 46 27 43 11 48 30 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, %272272222222 Cap, veh/h 91 831 267 80 1135 1001 136 54 65 76 111 63 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.64 0.64 0.04 0.63 0.63 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1303 418 1781 1796 1585 529 505 610 120 1038 589 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 59 0 1362 48 406 18 116 0 0 89 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1721 1781 1796 1585 1644 0 0 1747 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 0.0 40.6 1.7 6.8 0.3 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.1 0.0 40.6 1.7 6.8 0.3 4.1 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.24 1.00 1.00 0.40 0.37 0.12 0.34 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 91 0 1097 80 1135 1001 255 0 0 250 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.00 1.24 0.60 0.36 0.02 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 210 0 1097 185 1135 1001 794 0 0 848 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.7 0.0 11.5 29.8 5.6 4.4 27.2 0.0 0.0 26.7 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.6 0.0 116.4 7.0 0.9 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 0.0 44.1 0.8 1.8 0.1 1.7 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 37.3 0.0 127.9 36.9 6.5 4.4 28.7 0.0 0.0 27.8 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A F D A A C A A C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 1421 472 116 89 Approach Delay, s/veh 124.2 9.5 28.7 27.8 Approach LOS F A C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 45.9 11.4 6.7 45.5 11.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 5.3 4.6 3.5 5.3 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.6 40.6 29.4 7.5 39.7 29.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.7 42.6 5.0 4.1 8.8 6.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 2.4 0.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 89.0 HCM 6th LOS F ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 165 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 20: Curbaril Ave & SR 41 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 14 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 23 40 18 72 36 34 6 1073 153 60 520 29 Future Volume (veh/h) 23 40 18 72 36 34 6 1073 153 60 520 29 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1796 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 24 41 19 74 37 35 6 1106 158 62 536 30 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, %272272222222 Cap, veh/h 45 859 758 95 430 407 42 516 73 75 406 22 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.48 0.48 0.05 0.51 0.51 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1796 1585 1781 849 803 3 1607 229 94 1264 68 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 24 41 19 74 0 72 1270 0 0 628 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1796 1585 1781 0 1652 1839 0 0 1426 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.2 1.1 0.6 3.6 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.2 1.1 0.6 3.6 0.0 2.0 28.0 0.0 0.0 28.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.49 0.00 0.12 0.10 0.05 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 45 859 758 95 0 837 632 0 0 503 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.53 0.05 0.03 0.78 0.00 0.09 2.01 0.00 0.00 1.25 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 112 859 758 153 0 837 632 0 0 503 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 42.0 12.1 12.0 40.7 0.0 11.1 30.5 0.0 0.0 29.9 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.1 0.1 0.1 9.6 0.0 0.2 459.7 0.0 0.0 127.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 0.4 0.2 1.7 0.0 0.7 93.8 0.0 0.0 28.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 49.0 12.2 12.1 50.4 0.0 11.3 490.2 0.0 0.0 156.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B B D A B F A A F A A Approach Vol, veh/h 84 146 1270 628 Approach Delay, s/veh 22.7 31.1 490.2 156.9 Approach LOS C C F F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.2 47.0 32.0 5.7 49.5 32.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 5.3 4.0 3.5 5.3 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.5 41.7 28.0 5.5 43.7 28.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.6 3.1 30.0 3.2 4.0 30.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 341.9 HCM 6th LOS F ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 166 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 21: Atascadero Ave & SR 41 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 15 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 110 724 42 11 54 70 31 478 14 68 540 128 Future Volume (veh/h) 110 724 42 11 54 70 31 478 14 68 540 128 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1796 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 121 796 46 12 59 77 34 525 15 75 593 141 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, %272272222222 Cap, veh/h 80 630 556 25 226 295 32 487 440 41 326 313 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.35 0.35 0.01 0.32 0.32 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.20 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1796 1585 1781 707 923 113 1751 1585 209 1651 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 121 796 46 12 0 136 559 0 15 668 0 141 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1796 1585 1781 0 1630 1865 0 1585 1860 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.0 39.1 2.2 0.7 0.0 6.9 31.0 0.0 0.8 22.0 0.0 8.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.0 39.1 2.2 0.7 0.0 6.9 31.0 0.0 0.8 22.0 0.0 8.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.57 0.06 1.00 0.11 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 80 630 556 25 0 521 518 0 440 367 0 313 V/C Ratio(X) 1.52 1.26 0.08 0.48 0.00 0.26 1.08 0.00 0.03 1.82 0.00 0.45 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 80 630 556 80 0 571 518 0 440 367 0 313 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 53.3 36.2 24.2 54.6 0.0 28.2 40.3 0.0 29.4 44.8 0.0 39.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 285.8 131.3 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.1 62.4 0.0 0.0 380.1 0.0 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 8.5 39.0 0.8 0.4 0.0 2.7 22.8 0.0 0.3 48.9 0.0 3.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 339.1 167.5 24.3 59.9 0.0 28.3 102.7 0.0 29.4 424.9 0.0 39.8 LnGrp LOS F F C E A C F A C F A D Approach Vol, veh/h 963 148 574 809 Approach Delay, s/veh 182.2 30.8 100.8 357.8 Approach LOS F C F F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.6 44.4 26.0 9.0 41.0 35.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.3 4.0 4.0 5.3 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 39.1 22.0 5.0 39.1 31.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 41.1 24.0 7.0 8.9 33.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 211.5 HCM 6th LOS F ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 167 of 217 Turning Movement Volume: Summary 7/6/2021Report File: N:\...\Scenario B Intersections.pdf Scenario 2 Scenario BVistro File: N:\...\ATA038.ProjectVolume.vistro 106 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 106 Left Northbound El Camino Real/Rosario Ave- US NB On-Ramp7 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru Southbound 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound San Anselmo Rd/El Camino Real6 Intersection NameID 606 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 606 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound San Anselmo Rd/US101 NB Ramps5 Intersection NameID 1626 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 1020 Right 606 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound San Anselmo Rd/US101 SB Ramps4 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Del Rio Rd/El Camino Real3 Intersection NameID 640 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 640 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Del Rio Rd/US 101 NB Ramp2 Intersection NameID 1300 Total Volume 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 660 Right 640 Thru Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Left Northbound Del Rio Rd/US 101 SB Ramp1 Intersection NameID Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 168 of 217 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Curbaril Ave/US 101 NB Ramps15 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Curbaril Ave/US 101 SB Ramps14 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound El Camino Real/US 101 NB Ramps (S of Atascadero)13 Intersection NameID 606 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 340 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 266 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/El Camino Real12 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR41/US 101 SB Ramps11 Intersection NameID 612 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 266 Right 240 Thru 106 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Traffic Wy/El Camino Real10 Intersection NameID 612 Total Volume 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 612 Thru Eastbound 0 Right 0 Left Northbound Traffic Wy/US 101 NB Off- Ramp9 Intersection NameID 796 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 424 Right 372 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Traffic Wy/US 101 SB Ramps8 Intersection NameID Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 169 of 217 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Portola Rd23 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru Eastbound 0 Right 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Santa Rosa Rd22 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/San Gabriel Rd21 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru Westbound 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Left Southbound SR 41/Los Altos Rd20 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Santa Rosa Rd/El Camino Real19 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Santa Rosa Rd/US 101 NB Ramps18 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Santa Rosa Rd/US 101 SB Ramps17 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Curbaril Ave/El Camino Real16 Intersection NameID Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 170 of 217 240 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 240 Thru 0 Left Northbound San Ramon Rd/US 101 SB Ramp (N of Atascadero)28 Intersection NameID 240 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 240 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound El Camino Real/US 101 NB (N of Atascadero)27 Intersection NameID 846 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 606 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 240 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Mercedes Ave26 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/ Atascadero Ave25 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Curbaril Ave24 Intersection NameID Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 171 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: US 101 SB Ramps & Del Rio Road 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 753 720 145 135 0000232091 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 753 720 145 135 0000232091 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000 000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 810 774 156 145 0 249 0 98 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, %022220 222 Cap, veh/h 0 451 431 175 111 0 410 0 365 Arrive On Green 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.23 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 879 840 0 217 0 1781 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 1584 301 0 0 249 0 98 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 0 1719 217 0 0 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 1.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 16.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 1.6 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.49 0.52 0.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 0 882 287 0 0 410 0 365 V/C Ratio(X)0.00 0.00 1.80 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 0 882 287 0 0 914 0 814 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 7.6 9.7 0.0 0.0 10.7 0.0 9.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 362.4 67.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 91.2 6.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 370.0 76.8 0.0 0.0 12.2 0.0 10.2 LnGrp LOS A A F F A A B A B Approach Vol, veh/h 1584 301 347 Approach Delay, s/veh 370.0 76.8 11.6 Approach LOS F E B Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.0 11.2 20.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 16.0 16.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 18.0 5.9 18.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.3 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 274.7 HCM 6th LOS F ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 172 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2: US 101 NB Ramps & Del Rio Road 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 707 292 0 0 180 193 79 0 162 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 707 292 0 0 180 193 79 0 162 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 0 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 768 317 0 0 196 210 86 0 176 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 20022222 Cap, veh/h 524 131 0 0 444 476 345 0 307 Arrive On Green 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.19 0.00 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 590 243 0 0 826 885 1781 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1085 0000406860176 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 833 00001711 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 1.2 0.0 3.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 1.2 0.0 3.0 Prop In Lane 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.52 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 654 00009203450307 V/C Ratio(X) 1.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.25 0.00 0.57 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 654 00009209580852 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh10.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 10.2 0.0 10.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 302.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.0 1.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln58.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 313.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 10.5 0.0 12.6 LnGrp LOS F AAAAABAB Approach Vol, veh/h 1085 406 262 Approach Delay, s/veh 313.7 4.5 11.9 Approach LOS F A B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.8 20.0 20.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 16.0 16.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.0 18.0 6.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 0.0 1.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 197.0 HCM 6th LOS F ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 173 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 3: El Camino Real & Del Rio Road 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 82 82 267 21 91 9 226 117 20 14 99 55 Future Volume (veh/h) 82 82 267 21 91 9 226 117 20 14 99 55 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 85 85 275 22 94 9 233 121 21 14 102 57 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222 Cap, veh/h 233 200 324 109 299 25 269 939 796 118 470 263 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.15 0.50 0.50 0.07 0.42 0.41 Sat Flow, veh/h 641 980 1585 142 1464 125 1781 1870 1585 1781 1127 630 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 170 0 275 125 0 0 233 121 21 14 0 159 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1620 0 1585 1730 0 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1757 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 0.0 8.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 1.8 0.4 0.4 0.0 3.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.5 0.0 8.8 3.0 0.0 0.0 6.7 1.8 0.4 0.4 0.0 3.1 Prop In Lane 0.50 1.00 0.18 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 433 0 324 433 0 0 269 939 796 118 0 733 V/C Ratio(X) 0.39 0.00 0.85 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.13 0.03 0.12 0.00 0.22 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 917 0 826 945 0 0 338 939 796 135 0 733 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh18.4 0.0 20.2 17.9 0.0 0.0 21.9 7.0 6.6 23.2 0.0 9.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 2.4 0.5 0.0 0.0 14.9 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.7 0.0 3.2 1.3 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 18.6 0.0 22.7 18.4 0.0 0.0 36.8 7.3 6.7 23.3 0.0 10.6 LnGrp LOS B A C B A A D A A C A B Approach Vol, veh/h 445 125 375 173 Approach Delay, s/veh 21.1 18.4 25.6 11.6 Approach LOS C B C B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.5 30.5 14.8 12.0 26.0 14.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s4.5 26.0 28.0 10.5 20.0 28.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s2.4 3.8 10.8 8.7 5.1 5.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.7 0.5 0.0 0.7 0.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 20.8 HCM 6th LOS C ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 174 of 217 HCM 6th TWSC 4: San Anselmo Avenue & US 101 South 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 25.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 937 1208 288 392 00001671176 Future Vol, veh/h 0 937 1208 288 392 00001671176 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0000000085072 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - 0 --------50 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 0 1018 1313 313 426 00001821191 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 2331 0 0 2812 3383 498 Stage 1 ------1052 1052 - Stage 2 ------1760 2331 - Critical Hdwy - - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------5.42 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------5.42 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - ~ 212 - 0 ~ 20 8 572 Stage 1 0 ----0 336303- Stage 2 0 ----0 ~ 15271- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - ~ 212 - - 0 0 533 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------ 00- Stage 1 ------ 3360- Stage 2 ------ 00- Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 118.7 HCM LOS - Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBTSBLn1SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) - - ~ 212 - - 533 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 1.477 - - 0.359 HCM Control Delay (s) - - 280.2 0 - 15.5 HCM Lane LOS - - F A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 18.9 - - 1.6 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 175 of 217 HCM 6th TWSC 5: US 101 North & San Anselmo Avenue 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 10.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 741 252 0 0 415 214 174 0 397 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 741 252 0 0 415 214 174 0 397 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length --------25--- Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 805 274 0 0 451 233 189 0 432 0 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 684 0 - - - 0 2452 2568 274 Stage 1 ------1884 1884 - Stage 2 ------568684- Critical Hdwy 4.12 -----6.42 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------5.42 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------5.42 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 -----3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 909 - 0 0 - - ~ 34 26 765 Stage 1 - - 0 0 - - ~ 131 119 - Stage 2 - - 0 0 - - 567 449 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 909 -----00765 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------00- Stage 1 ------00- Stage 2 ------5670- Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 22.8 0 HCM LOS - Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT WBT WBR Capacity (veh/h) - 765 909 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.564 0.886 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 15.6 30.6 0 - - HCM Lane LOS - C D A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 3.6 12.1 - - - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 176 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: El Camino Real & San Anselmo Rd 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 336 26 153 7 20 0 241 217 21 6 200 240 Future Volume (veh/h) 336 26 153 7 20 0 241 217 21 6 200 240 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 357 28 163 7 21 0 256 231 22 6 213 255 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222 Cap, veh/h 399 31 381 94 281 0 293 1142 108 11 674 293 Arrive On Green 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.16 0.35 0.35 0.01 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 1657 130 1585 462 1385 0 1781 3281 310 1781 3554 1546 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 385 0 163 28 0 0 256 124 129 6 213 255 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1787 0 1585 1847 0 0 1781 1777 1814 1781 1777 1546 Q Serve(g_s), s 16.5 0.0 6.9 1.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 3.9 3.9 0.3 4.1 12.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.5 0.0 6.9 1.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 3.9 3.9 0.3 4.1 12.6 Prop In Lane 0.93 1.00 0.25 0.00 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 430 0 381 374 0 0 293 618 631 11 674 293 V/C Ratio(X) 0.90 0.00 0.43 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.20 0.20 0.54 0.32 0.87 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 430 0 381 374 0 0 293 618 631 90 720 313 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.0 0.0 25.4 25.5 0.0 0.0 32.2 18.0 18.1 39.1 27.6 31.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 23.8 0.0 3.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 23.9 0.2 0.2 35.0 0.3 21.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 9.7 0.0 2.7 0.5 0.0 0.0 6.4 1.5 1.5 0.2 1.6 6.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 52.8 0.0 28.9 25.9 0.0 0.0 56.1 18.2 18.2 74.1 27.8 52.3 LnGrp LOS D A C C AAEBBECD Approach Vol, veh/h 548 28 509 474 Approach Delay, s/veh 45.7 25.9 37.3 41.6 Approach LOS DCDD Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 17.0 19.0 20.0 4.5 31.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 13.0 16.0 16.0 4.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 18.5 13.1 14.6 3.0 2.3 5.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 41.3 HCM 6th LOS D ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 177 of 217 HCM 6th TWSC 7: El Camino Real & US 10 NB On/Rosario Ave 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 10.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 44 7 27 253 529 78 27 486 4 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 44 7 27 253 529 78 27 486 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length ------75--60-- Veh in Median Storage, # - 1 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 48 8 29 275 575 85 29 528 4 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1756 1758 330 532 0 0 660 0 0 Stage 1 1168 1168 ------- Stage 2 588 590 ------- Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.53 6.93 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.83 5.53 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 5.53 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 4.019 3.319 2.219 - - 2.219 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 84 84 667 1034 - - 926 - - Stage 1 259 267 ------- Stage 2 554 494 ------- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 60 0 667 1034 - - 926 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 60 0 ------- Stage 1 190 0 ------- Stage 2 537 0 ------- Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 155.1 2.9 0.5 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1034 - - 92 926 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.266 - - 0.922 0.032 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.7 - - 155.1 9 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - F A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.1 - - 5.2 0.1 - - ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 178 of 217 HCM 6th TWSC 8: US 101 South On & Traffic Way 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 8 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 134.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 665 520 178 386 00001621141 Future Vol, veh/h 0 665 520 178 386 00001621141 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - Stop Storage Length ------------ Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 0 723 565 193 420 00001761153 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 1288 0 0 1812 2094 420 Stage 1 ------ 806806- Stage 2 ------1006 1288 - Critical Hdwy - - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------5.42 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------5.42 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 538 - 0 ~ 86 52 633 Stage 1 0 ----0 439395- Stage 2 0 ----0 353234- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 538 - - ~ 46 0 633 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------ ~ 460- Stage 1 ------ 4390- Stage 2 ------ 1880- Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 4.9 $ 901.8 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBTSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) - - 538 - 117 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.36 - 2.824 HCM Control Delay (s) - - 15.4 0$ 901.8 HCM Lane LOS - - C A F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.6 - 30.7 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 179 of 217 HCM 6th TWSC 9: US 101 North Off & Traffic Way 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 9 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 131.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 1056 0 0 415 155 261 Future Vol, veh/h 1056 0 0 415 155 261 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 1148 0 0 451 168 284 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 - - - 1599 574 Stage 1 - - - - 1148 - Stage 2 - - - - 451 - Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.63 6.93 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.83 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.519 3.319 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - ~ 106 463 Stage 1 - 0 0 - 265 - Stage 2 - 0 0 - 641 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - ~ 106 463 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - ~ 106 - Stage 1 - - - - 265 - Stage 2 - - - - 641 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 $ 595.6 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT Capacity (veh/h) 205 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 2.206 - - HCM Control Delay (s) $ 595.6 - - HCM Lane LOS F - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 35.7 - - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 180 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 10: El Camino Real & Traffic Way 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 10 HCM 6th Edition methodology cannot be performed with phasing conflicts. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 181 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: US 101 SB Ramps & SR 41 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 11 HCM 6th Edition methodology supports speed limit in the range of 25 to 55 mph. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 182 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 12: El Camino Real & SR 41 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 12 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 197 658 458 179 253 107 198 438 291 378 322 99 Future Volume (veh/h) 197 658 458 179 253 107 198 438 291 378 322 99 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1841 1856 1856 1841 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 205 685 477 186 264 111 206 456 303 394 335 103 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 43343333333 Cap, veh/h 358 673 1231 215 934 382 271 830 359 190 931 408 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.37 0.37 0.12 0.39 0.39 0.08 0.24 0.24 0.11 0.26 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 3428 1841 2768 1767 2418 989 3428 3526 1526 1767 3526 1546 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 205 685 477 186 189 186 206 456 303 394 335 103 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1714 1841 1384 1767 1749 1658 1714 1763 1526 1767 1763 1546 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.6 42.4 13.4 12.0 8.6 9.0 6.8 13.2 22.0 12.5 9.0 4.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.6 42.4 13.4 12.0 8.6 9.0 6.8 13.2 22.0 12.5 9.0 4.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 358 673 1231 215 675 640 271 830 359 190 931 408 V/C Ratio(X) 0.57 1.02 0.39 0.87 0.28 0.29 0.76 0.55 0.84 2.07 0.36 0.25 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 358 673 1231 259 675 640 458 942 408 190 931 408 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.89 0.89 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh49.5 36.8 21.6 50.0 24.5 24.6 52.3 39.0 42.3 51.7 34.7 17.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.0 37.3 0.8 22.2 1.0 1.1 4.4 0.6 13.6 498.7 0.3 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.9 25.3 4.4 6.6 3.7 3.7 3.1 5.7 9.5 31.8 3.8 2.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 51.5 74.0 22.4 72.2 25.5 25.8 56.7 39.5 55.9 550.5 35.0 18.2 LnGrp LOS D F C E C C E D E F C B Approach Vol, veh/h 1367 561 965 832 Approach Delay, s/veh 52.6 41.1 48.3 277.0 Approach LOS D D D F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2345678 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s19.1 47.0 12.7 37.2 16.7 49.4 16.0 33.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 4.6 3.5 6.6 4.6 * 4.6 3.5 * 6.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s17.0 37.8 15.5 26.0 11.5 * 45 12.5 * 31 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s14.0 44.4 8.8 11.0 8.6 11.0 14.5 24.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.3 2.5 0.2 2.3 0.0 2.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 99.9 HCM 6th LOS F Notes * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 183 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 13: El Camino Real & US 101 NB Ramps /Plaza Del Camino Driveway 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 13 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 00000000000 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 00000000000 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 00000000000 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222 Cap, veh/h 0 748 0 748 634 160 1421 0 160 1421 Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 1870 1585 0 1870 1585 1781 3647 0 1781 3647 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 00000000000 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1870 1585 0 1870 1585 1781 1777 0 1781 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 748 0 748 634 160 1421 0 160 1421 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 748 0 748 634 160 1421 0 160 1421 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A AAAAAAAA Approach Vol, veh/h 0 A 0 0 0 A Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS Timer - Assigned Phs 2468 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 0.0 HCM 6th LOS A Notes Unsignalized Delay for [EBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 184 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: US 101 South Ramp & Santa Rosa 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 14 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 2 208 17 102 307 121 0 0 0 320 14 77 Future Volume (veh/h) 2 208 17 102 307 121 0 0 0 320 14 77 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000 000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 2 226 18 111 334 132 348 15 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222 222 Cap, veh/h 92 624 49 194 381 139 743 32 Arrive On Green 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.43 0.43 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 3 1706 135 237 1042 379 1711 74 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 246 0 0 577 0 0 363 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1844 0 0 1657 0 0 1785 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.1 0.0 0.0 5.8 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.9 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.01 0.07 0.19 0.23 0.96 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 765 0 0 714 0 0 775 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 828 0 0 768 0 0 775 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.3 0.0 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.2 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 9.5 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A AABAA BA Approach Vol, veh/h 246 577 363 A Approach Delay, s/veh 9.5 10.1 10.1 Approach LOS A B B Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.6 21.4 18.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 16.0 16.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.9 7.8 14.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 1.0 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.0 HCM 6th LOS A Notes Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 185 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: East Front Road/US 101 North Ramp & Santa Rosa 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 15 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 72 396 78 8 332 337 193 171 76 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 72 396 78 8 332 337 193 171 76 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 78 430 85 9 361 366 210 186 83 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222 Cap, veh/h 152 484 89 97 741 634 311 276 123 Arrive On Green 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 Sat Flow, veh/h 126 1210 223 13 1853 1585 779 690 308 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 593 0 0 370 0 366 479 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1559 0 0 1866 0 1585 1776 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.2 8.9 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.7 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 7.2 8.9 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.13 0.14 0.02 1.00 0.44 0.17 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 726 0 0 839 0 634 710 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.58 0.67 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 726 0 0 839 0 634 710 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.60 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh11.4 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 9.4 9.9 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.9 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.8 5.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln5.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 1.9 3.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 18.3 0.0 0.0 9.2 0.0 10.1 14.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B AAAABBAA Approach Vol, veh/h 593 736 479 Approach Delay, s/veh 18.3 9.7 14.9 Approach LOS B A B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.0 20.0 20.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 16.0 16.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.9 16.7 9.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.0 0.0 2.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.9 HCM 6th LOS B ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 186 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 16: El Camino Real & Santa Rosa Road 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 16 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 219 4 309 4 25 19 412 681 4 9 617 309 Future Volume (veh/h) 219 4 309 4 25 19 412 681 4 9 617 309 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 231 4 325 4 26 20 434 717 4 9 649 325 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222 Cap, veh/h 336 6 620 8 50 39 356 1881 10 20 1174 509 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.20 0.52 0.52 0.01 0.33 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 1752 30 1583 139 902 694 1781 3623 20 1781 3554 1540 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 235 0 325 50 0 0 434 352 369 9 649 325 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1783 0 1583 1734 0 0 1781 1777 1866 1781 1777 1540 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.0 0.0 14.1 2.5 0.0 0.0 18.0 10.7 10.7 0.5 13.5 16.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.0 0.0 14.1 2.5 0.0 0.0 18.0 10.7 10.7 0.5 13.5 16.1 Prop In Lane 0.98 1.00 0.08 0.40 1.00 0.01 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 342 0 620 96 0 0 356 923 969 20 1174 509 V/C Ratio(X) 0.69 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.00 1.22 0.38 0.38 0.45 0.55 0.64 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 475 0 739 96 0 0 356 923 969 99 1174 509 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.36 0.00 0.36 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh33.9 0.0 21.0 41.3 0.0 0.0 36.0 13.0 13.0 44.2 24.7 25.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.1 2.3 0.0 0.0 121.1 1.2 1.1 5.8 1.9 6.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln4.7 0.0 5.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 19.6 4.3 4.5 0.2 5.8 6.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.2 0.0 21.0 43.6 0.0 0.0 157.1 14.2 14.1 50.0 26.6 31.6 LnGrp LOS C A C D A A F B B D C C Approach Vol, veh/h 560 50 1155 983 Approach Delay, s/veh 26.6 43.6 67.8 28.4 Approach LOS C D E C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s23.0 34.7 22.3 6.0 51.7 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s18.0 23.0 24.0 5.0 36.0 5.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s20.0 18.1 16.1 2.5 12.7 4.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.2 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 44.9 HCM 6th LOS D ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 187 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 17: San Gabriel Road & SR 41 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 17 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 18 321 28 86 306 84 9 9 41 39 18 9 Future Volume (veh/h) 18 321 28 86 306 84 9 9 41 39 18 9 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1796 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 19 338 29 91 322 88 9 9 43 41 19 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 72272222222 Cap, veh/h 257 647 56 151 458 125 139 41 141 264 75 26 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.40 0.40 0.08 0.34 0.34 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1631 140 1781 1358 371 149 327 1137 776 601 206 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 19 0 367 91 0 410 61 0 0 69 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 0 1771 1781 0 1729 1613 0 0 1583 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.3 0.0 5.4 1.7 0.0 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.3 0.0 5.4 1.7 0.0 7.1 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.21 0.15 0.70 0.59 0.13 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 257 0 703 151 0 583 321 0 0 364 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.07 0.00 0.52 0.60 0.00 0.70 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 338 0 1862 702 0 2171 1375 0 0 1357 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh12.7 0.0 7.9 15.1 0.0 9.9 13.6 0.0 0.0 13.6 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.6 4.6 0.0 1.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.1 0.0 1.1 0.7 0.0 1.7 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 12.8 0.0 8.5 19.8 0.0 11.4 13.9 0.0 0.0 13.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B AABABBAABAA Approach Vol, veh/h 386 501 61 69 Approach Delay, s/veh 8.7 12.9 13.9 13.9 Approach LOS ABBB Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s6.4 19.6 8.3 8.4 17.5 8.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 6.0 4.0 3.5 6.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s13.5 36.0 27.0 6.5 43.0 27.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s3.7 7.4 3.2 2.3 9.1 3.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 2.1 0.3 0.0 2.5 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.4 HCM 6th LOS B ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 188 of 217 HCM 6th TWSC 18: Santa Rosa Road & SR 41 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 18 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 369 41 31 401 74 26 Future Vol, veh/h 369 41 31 401 74 26 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 100 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 22722 Mvmt Flow 405 45 34 441 81 29 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 450 0 937 428 Stage 1 - - - - 428 - Stage 2 - - - - 509 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1110 - 294 627 Stage 1 - - - - 657 - Stage 2 - - - - 604 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1110 - 285 627 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 412 - Stage 1 - - - - 657 - Stage 2 - - - - 585 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.6 15.5 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 452 - - 1110 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.243 - - 0.031 - HCM Control Delay (s) 15.5 - - 8.3 - HCM Lane LOS C - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 - - 0.1 - ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 189 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 19: Portola Road & SR 41 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 19 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 57 416 82 46 390 17 44 26 41 11 46 29 Future Volume (veh/h) 57 416 82 46 390 17 44 26 41 11 46 29 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1796 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 59 433 85 48 406 18 46 27 43 11 48 30 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, %272272222222 Cap, veh/h 91 930 183 80 1135 1001 136 54 65 76 111 63 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.64 0.64 0.04 0.63 0.63 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1458 286 1781 1796 1585 529 505 610 120 1038 589 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 59 0 518 48 406 18 116 0 0 89 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1745 1781 1796 1585 1644 0 0 1747 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 0.0 9.7 1.7 6.8 0.3 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.1 0.0 9.7 1.7 6.8 0.3 4.1 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.16 1.00 1.00 0.40 0.37 0.12 0.34 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 91 0 1112 80 1135 1001 255 0 0 250 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.00 0.47 0.60 0.36 0.02 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 210 0 1112 185 1135 1001 794 0 0 848 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.7 0.0 5.9 29.8 5.6 4.4 27.2 0.0 0.0 26.7 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.6 0.0 1.4 7.0 0.9 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 0.0 2.5 0.8 1.8 0.1 1.7 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 37.3 0.0 7.3 36.9 6.5 4.4 28.7 0.0 0.0 27.8 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A A D A A C A A C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 577 472 116 89 Approach Delay, s/veh 10.4 9.5 28.7 27.8 Approach LOS B A C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 45.9 11.4 6.7 45.5 11.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 5.3 4.6 3.5 5.3 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.6 40.6 29.4 7.5 39.7 29.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.7 11.7 5.0 4.1 8.8 6.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.2 0.5 0.0 2.4 0.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.0 HCM 6th LOS B ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 190 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 20: Curbaril Ave & SR 41 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 20 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 23 40 18 72 36 34 6 400 93 60 520 29 Future Volume (veh/h) 23 40 18 72 36 34 6 400 93 60 520 29 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1796 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 24 41 19 74 37 35 6 412 96 62 536 30 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 72272222222 Cap, veh/h 45 859 758 95 430 407 44 473 109 80 444 24 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.48 0.48 0.05 0.51 0.51 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1796 1585 1781 849 803 6 1474 340 107 1381 75 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 24 41 19 74 0 72 514 0 0 628 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1796 1585 1781 0 1652 1820 0 0 1563 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.2 1.1 0.6 3.6 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.2 1.1 0.6 3.6 0.0 2.0 23.4 0.0 0.0 28.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.49 0.01 0.19 0.10 0.05 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 45 859 758 95 0 837 627 0 0 548 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.53 0.05 0.03 0.78 0.00 0.09 0.82 0.00 0.00 1.15 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 112 859 758 153 0 837 627 0 0 548 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh42.0 12.1 12.0 40.7 0.0 11.1 28.0 0.0 0.0 30.3 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.1 0.1 0.1 9.6 0.0 0.2 8.5 0.0 0.0 85.9 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.6 0.4 0.2 1.7 0.0 0.7 11.2 0.0 0.0 24.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 49.0 12.2 12.1 50.4 0.0 11.3 36.6 0.0 0.0 116.2 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B B D A B D A A F A A Approach Vol, veh/h 84 146 514 628 Approach Delay, s/veh 22.7 31.1 36.6 116.2 Approach LOS C C D F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s8.2 47.0 32.0 5.7 49.5 32.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 5.3 4.0 3.5 5.3 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s7.5 41.7 28.0 5.5 43.7 28.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s5.6 3.1 30.0 3.2 4.0 25.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 71.6 HCM 6th LOS E ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 191 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 21: Atascadero Ave & SR 41 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 21 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 110 51 42 11 54 70 31 478 14 68 540 128 Future Volume (veh/h) 110 51 42 11 54 70 31 478 14 68 540 128 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1796 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 121 56 46 12 59 77 34 525 15 75 593 141 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 72272222222 Cap, veh/h 111 285 251 26 78 102 37 575 521 57 454 436 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.16 0.16 0.01 0.11 0.11 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.27 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1796 1585 1781 707 923 113 1751 1585 209 1651 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 121 56 46 12 0 136 559 0 15 668 0 141 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1796 1585 1781 0 1630 1865 0 1585 1860 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.0 2.2 2.0 0.5 0.0 6.5 23.0 0.0 0.5 22.0 0.0 5.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.0 2.2 2.0 0.5 0.0 6.5 23.0 0.0 0.5 22.0 0.0 5.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.57 0.06 1.00 0.11 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 111 285 251 26 0 180 612 0 521 511 0 436 V/C Ratio(X) 1.09 0.20 0.18 0.46 0.00 0.75 0.91 0.00 0.03 1.31 0.00 0.32 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 111 878 774 111 0 796 722 0 614 511 0 436 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh37.5 29.3 29.2 39.1 0.0 34.5 25.8 0.0 18.2 29.0 0.0 23.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 110.8 0.1 0.1 4.6 0.0 2.4 13.4 0.0 0.0 151.6 0.0 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln5.5 0.9 0.7 0.3 0.0 2.6 11.7 0.0 0.2 31.0 0.0 2.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 148.3 29.4 29.3 43.8 0.0 36.9 39.2 0.0 18.2 180.7 0.0 23.3 LnGrp LOS F C C D A D D A B F A C Approach Vol, veh/h 223 148 574 809 Approach Delay, s/veh 93.9 37.5 38.6 153.2 Approach LOS F D D F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s5.2 18.0 26.0 9.0 14.2 30.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.3 4.0 4.0 5.3 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s5.0 39.1 22.0 5.0 39.1 31.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s2.5 4.2 24.0 7.0 8.5 25.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 98.4 HCM 6th LOS F ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 192 of 217 Turning Movement Volume: Summary 7/6/2021Report File: N:\...\Scenario C Intersections.pdf Scenario 3 Scenario CVistro File: N:\...\ATA038.ProjectVolume.vistro 1010 Total Volume 0 Right 402 Thru 503 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 105 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound El Camino Real/Rosario Ave- US NB On-Ramp7 Intersection NameID 2209 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Left Eastbound 1584 Right 0 Thru Southbound 0 Thru 625 Left Northbound San Anselmo Rd/El Camino Real6 Intersection NameID 2209 Total Volume 601 Right 1608 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound San Anselmo Rd/US101 NB Ramps5 Intersection NameID 1469 Total Volume 0 Right 196 Thru 1273 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound San Anselmo Rd/US101 SB Ramps4 Intersection NameID 788 Total Volume 0 Right 166 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 171 Thru 451 Left Northbound Del Rio Rd/El Camino Real3 Intersection NameID 617 Total Volume 617 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Del Rio Rd/US 101 NB Ramp2 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Left Northbound Del Rio Rd/US 101 SB Ramp1 Intersection NameID Scenario C Project Trips Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 193 of 217 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Curbaril Ave/US 101 NB Ramps15 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Curbaril Ave/US 101 SB Ramps14 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound El Camino Real/US 101 NB Ramps (S of Atascadero)13 Intersection NameID 608 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 608 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/El Camino Real (S of Atascadero)12 Intersection NameID 884 Total Volume 0 Right 884 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR41/US 101 SB Ramps11 Intersection NameID 1413 Total Volume 0 Right 805 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 608 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Traffic Wy/El Camino Real10 Intersection NameID 805 Total Volume 805 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru Eastbound 0 Right 0 Left Northbound Traffic Wy/US 101 NB Off- Ramp9 Intersection NameID 805 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 805 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Traffic Wy/US 101 SB Ramps8 Intersection NameID Scenario C Project Trips Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 194 of 217 1080 Total Volume 0 Right 884 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 196 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Portola Rd23 Intersection NameID 1080 Total Volume 1080 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru Eastbound 0 Right 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Santa Rosa Rd22 Intersection NameID 1080 Total Volume 0 Right 1080 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/San Gabriel Rd21 Intersection NameID 1080 Total Volume 0 Right 1080 Thru Westbound 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Left Southbound SR 41/Los Altos Rd20 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Santa Rosa Rd/El Camino Real19 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Santa Rosa Rd/US 101 NB Ramps18 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Santa Rosa Rd/US 101 SB Ramps17 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound Curbaril Ave/El Camino Real16 Intersection NameID Scenario C Project Trips Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 195 of 217 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound San Ramon Rd/US 101 SB Ramp (N of Atascadero)28 Intersection NameID 171 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 171 Left Northbound El Camino Real/US 101 NB (N of Atascadero)27 Intersection NameID 0 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Mercedes Ave26 Intersection NameID 884 Total Volume 0 Right 884 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/ Atascadero Ave25 Intersection NameID 884 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Eastbound 0 Right 884 Thru 0 Left Southbound 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Northbound SR 41/Curbaril Ave24 Intersection NameID Scenario C Project Trips Version 2021 (SP 0-0) Generated with ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 196 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: US 101 SB Ramps & Del Rio Road 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 113 60 145 135 0000232091 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 113 60 145 135 0000232091 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000 000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 122 65 156 145 0 249 0 98 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, %022220 222 Cap, veh/h 0 380 202 454 272 0 500 0 445 Arrive On Green 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.28 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 1148 612 570 821 0 1781 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 0 187 301 0 0 249 0 98 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 0 1760 1391 0 0 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 1.6 2.3 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 1.6 4.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 1.0 Prop In Lane 0.00 0.35 0.52 0.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 0 583 726 0 0 500 0 445 V/C Ratio(X)0.00 0.00 0.32 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.22 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 0 1367 1371 0 0 1383 0 1231 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 5.2 5.9 0.0 0.0 6.2 0.0 5.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 5.5 6.3 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 5.9 LnGrp LOS AAAAAA AAA Approach Vol, veh/h 187 301 347 Approach Delay, s/veh 5.5 6.3 6.7 Approach LOS A A A Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.8 9.8 10.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 16.0 16.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 4.4 6.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 1.4 1.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.3 HCM 6th LOS A ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 197 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2: US 101 NB Ramps & Del Rio Road 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 67 292 0 0 180 810 79 0 162 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 67 292 0 0 180 810 79 0 162 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 0 0 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 73 317 0 0 196 880 86 0 176 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 20022222 Cap, veh/h 144 412 0 0 160 717 345 0 307 Arrive On Green 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.19 0.00 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 766 0 0 297 1333 1781 0 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 390 00001076 86 0 176 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 766 00001630 1781 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.0 1.2 0.0 3.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.0 1.2 0.0 3.0 Prop In Lane 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.82 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 556 00008763450307 V/C Ratio(X) 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.23 0.25 0.00 0.57 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 556 00008769580852 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.9 10.2 0.0 10.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 112.6 0.4 0.0 1.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.2 0.4 0.0 0.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 119.5 10.5 0.0 12.6 LnGrp LOS A AAAAFBAB Approach Vol, veh/h 390 1076 262 Approach Delay, s/veh 9.5 119.5 11.9 Approach LOS A F B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.8 20.0 20.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 16.0 16.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.0 18.0 18.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.8 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 78.3 HCM 6th LOS E ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 198 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 3: El Camino Real & Del Rio Road 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 82 82 267 21 257 9 677 288 20 14 99 55 Future Volume (veh/h) 82 82 267 21 257 9 677 288 20 14 99 55 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 85 85 275 22 265 9 698 297 21 14 102 57 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222 Cap, veh/h 221 189 332 85 354 12 331 939 796 116 430 240 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.19 0.50 0.50 0.07 0.38 0.37 Sat Flow, veh/h 574 899 1585 65 1687 55 1781 1870 1585 1781 1127 630 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 170 0 275 296 0 0 698 297 21 14 0 159 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1474 0 1585 1807 0 0 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1757 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 8.9 2.5 0.0 0.0 10.0 5.1 0.4 0.4 0.0 3.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.1 0.0 8.9 8.2 0.0 0.0 10.0 5.1 0.4 0.4 0.0 3.3 Prop In Lane 0.50 1.00 0.07 0.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 410 0 332 451 0 0 331 939 796 116 0 670 V/C Ratio(X) 0.42 0.00 0.83 0.66 0.00 0.00 2.11 0.32 0.03 0.12 0.00 0.24 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 829 0 810 979 0 0 331 939 796 132 0 670 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh18.7 0.0 20.3 20.0 0.0 0.0 21.9 7.9 6.8 23.7 0.0 11.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 2.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 508.5 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.7 0.0 3.2 3.5 0.0 0.0 50.3 1.6 0.1 0.2 0.0 1.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 18.9 0.0 22.3 22.3 0.0 0.0 530.3 8.8 6.8 23.9 0.0 12.2 LnGrp LOS B A C C A A F A A C A B Approach Vol, veh/h 445 296 1016 173 Approach Delay, s/veh 21.0 22.3 367.1 13.2 Approach LOS C C F B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s7.5 31.0 15.3 14.0 24.5 15.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 4.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s4.5 26.0 28.0 10.5 20.0 28.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s2.4 7.1 10.9 12.0 5.3 10.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.9 0.5 0.0 0.7 1.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 202.7 HCM 6th LOS F ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 199 of 217 HCM 6th TWSC 4: San Anselmo Avenue & US 101 South 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 168.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 331 188 1561 588 00001671176 Future Vol, veh/h 0 331 188 1561 588 00001671176 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0000000085072 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - 0 --------50 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 0 360 204 1697 639 00001821191 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 564 0 0 4580 4597 711 Stage 1 ------4033 4033 - Stage 2 ------ 547564- Critical Hdwy - - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------5.42 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------5.42 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - -~ 1008 - 0 ~ 1 ~ 1 433 Stage 1 0 ----0 ~ 98- Stage 2 0 ----0 580508- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - -~ 1008 - - 0 0 403 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------ 00- Stage 1 ------ ~ 90- Stage 2 ------ 00- Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 235.8 HCM LOS - Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBTSBLn1SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) - -~ 1008 - - 403 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 1.683 - - 0.475 HCM Control Delay (s) - -$ 324.6 0 - 21.7 HCM Lane LOS - - F A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 92.9 - - 2.5 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 200 of 217 HCM 6th TWSC 5: US 101 North & San Anselmo Avenue 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 5 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 10.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 135 252 0 0 2023 815 174 0 397 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 135 252 0 0 2023 815 174 0 397 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length --------25--- Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 147 274 0 0 2199 886 189 0 432 0 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 3085 0 - - - 0 3210 3653 274 Stage 1 ------568568- Stage 2 ------2642 3085 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 -----6.42 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------5.42 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------5.42 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 -----3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 106 - 0 0 - - ~ 11 5 765 Stage 1 - - 0 0 - - 567 506 - Stage 2 - - 0 0 - - ~ 54 28 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 106 -----00765 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------00- Stage 1 ------00- Stage 2 ------~ 540- Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 102.8 0 HCM LOS - Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT WBT WBR Capacity (veh/h) - 765 ~ 106 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.564 1.384 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 15.6 294.7 0 - - HCM Lane LOS - C F A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 3.6 10.4 - - - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 201 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: El Camino Real & San Anselmo Rd 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 336 26 153 7 20 0 866 217 21 6 200 1824 Future Volume (veh/h) 336 26 153 7 20 0 866 217 21 6 200 1824 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 357 28 163 7 21 0 921 231 22 6 213 1940 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222 Cap, veh/h 394 31 376 92 277 0 289 1169 110 11 711 309 Arrive On Green 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.16 0.36 0.36 0.01 0.20 0.20 Sat Flow, veh/h 1657 130 1585 462 1385 0 1781 3281 310 1781 3554 1547 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 385 0 163 28 0 0 921 124 129 6 213 1940 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1787 0 1585 1847 0 0 1781 1777 1814 1781 1777 1547 Q Serve(g_s), s 16.7 0.0 7.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 13.0 3.9 3.9 0.3 4.1 16.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.7 0.0 7.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 13.0 3.9 3.9 0.3 4.1 16.0 Prop In Lane 0.93 1.00 0.25 0.00 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 425 0 376 369 0 0 289 633 646 11 711 309 V/C Ratio(X) 0.91 0.00 0.43 0.08 0.00 0.00 3.18 0.20 0.20 0.54 0.30 6.27 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 425 0 376 369 0 0 289 633 646 89 711 309 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.6 0.0 25.9 26.0 0.0 0.0 33.5 17.8 17.8 39.6 27.2 32.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 25.6 0.0 3.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 990.8 0.1 0.1 35.1 0.2 2379.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 10.0 0.0 2.8 0.5 0.0 0.0 84.9 1.5 1.5 0.2 1.6 209.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 55.3 0.0 29.5 26.4 0.0 0.0 1024.3 18.0 18.0 74.7 27.5 2411.3 LnGrp LOS E A C C A A F B B E C F Approach Vol, veh/h 548 28 1174 2159 Approach Delay, s/veh 47.6 26.4 807.4 2169.7 Approach LOS D C F F Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.0 17.0 20.0 20.0 4.5 32.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 13.0 16.0 16.0 4.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 18.7 15.0 18.0 3.0 2.3 5.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 1447.7 HCM 6th LOS F ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 202 of 217 HCM 6th TWSC 7: El Camino Real & US 10 NB On/Rosario Ave 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 7 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2266.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 547 409 27 147 529 78 27 591 4 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 547 409 27 147 529 78 27 591 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length ------75--60-- Veh in Median Storage, # - 1 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 595 445 29 160 575 85 29 642 4 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1640 1642 330 646 0 0 660 0 0 Stage 1 938 938 ------- Stage 2 702 704 ------- Critical Hdwy 6.63 6.53 6.93 4.13 - - 4.13 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.83 5.53 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.43 5.53 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.519 4.019 3.319 2.219 - - 2.219 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 100 ~ 99 667 937 - - 926 - - Stage 1 ~ 342 ~ 342 ------- Stage 2 ~ 490 ~ 439 ------- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 80 0 667 937 - - 926 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 80 0 ------- Stage 1 ~ 284 0 ------- Stage 2 ~ 475 0 ------- Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s $ 5437.9 1.9 0.4 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 937 - - 83 926 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.171 - -12.873 0.032 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.6 - -$ 5437.9 9 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - F A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 - - 126.4 0.1 - - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 203 of 217 HCM 6th TWSC 8: US 101 South On & Traffic Way 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 8 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 17.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 293 96 983 386 00001621141 Future Vol, veh/h 0 293 96 983 386 00001621141 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000000000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - Stop Storage Length ------------ Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 0 318 104 1068 420 00001761153 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 0 422 0 0 2926 2978 420 Stage 1 ------2556 2556 - Stage 2 ------ 370422- Critical Hdwy - - - 4.12 - - 6.42 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------5.42 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------5.42 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy - - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 1137 - 0 ~ 17 14 633 Stage 1 0 ----0 ~ 5954- Stage 2 0 ----0 699588- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - 1137 - - 0 0 633 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------ 00- Stage 1 ------ ~ 590- Stage 2 ------ 00- Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 24.1 8.5 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT EBR WBL WBTSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) - - 1137 - 1365 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.94 - 0.242 HCM Control Delay (s) - - 33.6 0 8.5 HCM Lane LOS - - D A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 16.2 - 1 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 204 of 217 HCM 6th TWSC 9: US 101 North Off & Traffic Way 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 9 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 150 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 444 0 0 1220 155 261 Future Vol, veh/h 444 0 0 1220 155 261 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 483 0 0 1326 168 284 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 - - - 1809 242 Stage 1 - - - - 483 - Stage 2 - - - - 1326 - Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.63 6.93 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.83 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.43 - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.519 3.319 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 0 0 - ~ 78 759 Stage 1 - 0 0 - 587 - Stage 2 - 0 0 - 247 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - ~ 78 759 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - ~ 78 - Stage 1 - - - - 587 - Stage 2 - - - - 247 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 $ 750.2 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT WBT Capacity (veh/h) 178 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 2.54 - - HCM Control Delay (s) $ 750.2 - - HCM Lane LOS F - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 38.7 - - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 205 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 10: El Camino Real & Traffic Way 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 10 HCM 6th Edition methodology cannot be performed with phasing conflicts. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 206 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 11: US 101 SB Ramps & SR 41 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 11 HCM 6th Edition methodology supports speed limit in the range of 25 to 55 mph. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 207 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 12: El Camino Real & SR 41 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 12 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 197 318 458 179 253 107 198 438 291 112 322 707 Future Volume (veh/h) 197 318 458 179 253 107 198 438 291 112 322 707 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1856 1841 1856 1856 1841 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 1856 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 205 331 477 186 264 111 206 456 303 117 335 736 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 43343333333 Cap, veh/h 449 722 1305 215 934 382 271 830 359 143 837 367 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.26 0.26 0.12 0.39 0.39 0.08 0.24 0.24 0.08 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 3428 1841 2768 1767 2418 989 3428 3526 1526 1767 3526 1545 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 205 331 477 186 189 186 206 456 303 117 335 736 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1714 1841 1384 1767 1749 1658 1714 1763 1526 1767 1763 1545 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.6 17.5 14.5 12.0 8.6 9.0 6.8 13.2 22.0 7.6 9.3 19.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.6 17.5 14.5 12.0 8.6 9.0 6.8 13.2 22.0 7.6 9.3 19.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 449 722 1305 215 675 640 271 830 359 143 837 367 V/C Ratio(X) 0.46 0.46 0.37 0.87 0.28 0.29 0.76 0.55 0.84 0.82 0.40 2.01 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 449 722 1305 259 675 640 458 942 408 190 837 367 HCM Platoon Ratio 0.67 0.67 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.87 0.87 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh49.0 32.4 24.3 50.0 24.5 24.6 52.3 39.0 42.3 52.5 37.3 21.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 1.8 0.7 22.2 1.0 1.1 4.4 0.6 13.6 18.2 0.4 462.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln2.9 8.5 5.1 6.6 3.7 3.7 3.1 5.7 9.5 4.0 4.0 53.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 49.6 34.2 25.0 72.2 25.5 25.8 56.7 39.5 55.9 70.6 37.7 484.4 LnGrp LOS D C C E C C E D E E D F Approach Vol, veh/h 1013 561 965 1188 Approach Delay, s/veh 33.0 41.1 48.3 317.6 Approach LOS C D D F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2345678 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s19.1 50.1 12.7 34.1 19.8 49.4 12.9 33.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 4.6 3.5 6.6 4.6 * 4.6 3.5 * 6.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s17.0 37.8 15.5 26.0 11.5 * 45 12.5 * 31 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s14.0 19.5 8.8 21.3 8.6 11.0 9.6 24.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 3.8 0.3 2.6 0.2 2.3 0.1 2.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 128.9 HCM 6th LOS F Notes * HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 208 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 13: El Camino Real & US 101 NB Ramps /Plaza Del Camino Driveway 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 13 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 00000000000 Future Volume (veh/h) 0 00000000000 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 0 00000000000 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222 Cap, veh/h 0 748 0 748 634 160 1421 0 160 1421 Arrive On Green 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 0 1870 1585 0 1870 1585 1781 3647 0 1781 3647 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 0 00000000000 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 0 1870 1585 0 1870 1585 1781 1777 0 1781 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 0 748 0 748 634 160 1421 0 160 1421 V/C Ratio(X) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 0 748 0 748 634 160 1421 0 160 1421 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A AAAAAAAA Approach Vol, veh/h 0 A 0 0 0 A Approach Delay, s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS Timer - Assigned Phs 2468 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 0.0 HCM 6th LOS A Notes Unsignalized Delay for [EBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 209 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 14: US 101 South Ramp & Santa Rosa 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 14 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 2 208 17 102 307 121 0 0 0 320 14 77 Future Volume (veh/h) 2 208 17 102 307 121 0 0 0 320 14 77 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000 000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 2 226 18 111 334 132 348 15 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222 222 Cap, veh/h 92 624 49 194 381 139 743 32 Arrive On Green 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.43 0.43 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 3 1706 135 237 1042 379 1711 74 0 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 246 0 0 577 0 0 363 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1844 0 0 1657 0 0 1785 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.1 0.0 0.0 5.8 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.9 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.01 0.07 0.19 0.23 0.96 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 765 0 0 714 0 0 775 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 828 0 0 768 0 0 775 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.3 0.0 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln1.2 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 9.5 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A AABAA BA Approach Vol, veh/h 246 577 363 A Approach Delay, s/veh 9.5 10.1 10.1 Approach LOS A B B Timer - Assigned Phs 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.6 21.4 18.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 16.0 16.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.9 7.8 14.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 1.0 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.0 HCM 6th LOS A Notes Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 210 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 15: East Front Road/US 101 North Ramp & Santa Rosa 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 15 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 72 396 78 8 332 337 193 171 76 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 72 396 78 8 332 337 193 171 76 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 78 430 85 9 361 366 210 186 83 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222 Cap, veh/h 152 484 89 97 741 634 311 276 123 Arrive On Green 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 Sat Flow, veh/h 126 1210 223 13 1853 1585 779 690 308 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 593 0 0 370 0 366 479 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1559 0 0 1866 0 1585 1776 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.2 8.9 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.7 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 7.2 8.9 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.13 0.14 0.02 1.00 0.44 0.17 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 726 0 0 839 0 634 710 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.58 0.67 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 726 0 0 839 0 634 710 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.60 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh11.4 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 9.4 9.9 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.9 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.8 5.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln5.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 1.9 3.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 18.3 0.0 0.0 9.2 0.0 10.1 14.9 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B AAAABBAA Approach Vol, veh/h 593 736 479 Approach Delay, s/veh 18.3 9.7 14.9 Approach LOS B A B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.0 20.0 20.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 16.0 16.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.9 16.7 9.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.0 0.0 2.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.9 HCM 6th LOS B ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 211 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 16: El Camino Real & Santa Rosa Road 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 16 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 219 4 309 4 25 19 412 681 4 9 617 309 Future Volume (veh/h) 219 4 309 4 25 19 412 681 4 9 617 309 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 231 4 325 4 26 20 434 717 4 9 649 325 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 22222222222 Cap, veh/h 336 6 620 8 50 39 356 1881 10 20 1174 509 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.20 0.52 0.52 0.01 0.33 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 1752 30 1583 139 902 694 1781 3623 20 1781 3554 1540 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 235 0 325 50 0 0 434 352 369 9 649 325 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1783 0 1583 1734 0 0 1781 1777 1866 1781 1777 1540 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.0 0.0 14.1 2.5 0.0 0.0 18.0 10.7 10.7 0.5 13.5 16.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.0 0.0 14.1 2.5 0.0 0.0 18.0 10.7 10.7 0.5 13.5 16.1 Prop In Lane 0.98 1.00 0.08 0.40 1.00 0.01 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 342 0 620 96 0 0 356 923 969 20 1174 509 V/C Ratio(X) 0.69 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.00 1.22 0.38 0.38 0.45 0.55 0.64 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 475 0 739 96 0 0 356 923 969 99 1174 509 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.36 0.00 0.36 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh33.9 0.0 21.0 41.3 0.0 0.0 36.0 13.0 13.0 44.2 24.7 25.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.1 2.3 0.0 0.0 121.1 1.2 1.1 5.8 1.9 6.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln4.7 0.0 5.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 19.6 4.3 4.5 0.2 5.8 6.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.2 0.0 21.0 43.6 0.0 0.0 157.1 14.2 14.1 50.0 26.6 31.6 LnGrp LOS C A C D A A F B B D C C Approach Vol, veh/h 560 50 1155 983 Approach Delay, s/veh 26.6 43.6 67.8 28.4 Approach LOS C D E C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s23.0 34.7 22.3 6.0 51.7 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s18.0 23.0 24.0 5.0 36.0 5.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s20.0 18.1 16.1 2.5 12.7 4.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.2 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 44.9 HCM 6th LOS D ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 212 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 17: San Gabriel Road & SR 41 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 17 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 18 321 28 86 1386 84 9 9 41 39 18 9 Future Volume (veh/h) 18 321 28 86 1386 84 9 9 41 39 18 9 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1796 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 19 338 29 91 1459 88 9 9 43 41 19 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 72272222222 Cap, veh/h 133 1060 91 119 1077 65 74 27 94 154 47 17 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.65 0.65 0.07 0.64 0.64 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1631 140 1781 1677 101 145 336 1149 842 578 213 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 19 0 367 91 0 1547 61 0 0 69 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 0 1771 1781 0 1778 1631 0 0 1633 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 0.0 6.1 3.4 0.0 43.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 0.0 6.1 3.4 0.0 43.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.06 0.15 0.70 0.59 0.13 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 133 0 1151 119 0 1142 195 0 0 219 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.14 0.00 0.32 0.76 0.00 1.35 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 173 0 1151 359 0 1142 705 0 0 700 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh29.0 0.0 5.2 30.7 0.0 12.0 29.3 0.0 0.0 29.4 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.0 0.2 11.4 0.0 165.5 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.3 0.0 1.4 1.7 0.0 62.4 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 29.5 0.0 5.3 42.2 0.0 177.5 30.2 0.0 0.0 30.2 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A A D A F C A A C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 386 1638 61 69 Approach Delay, s/veh 6.5 170.0 30.2 30.2 Approach LOS A F C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s8.0 49.5 9.5 8.5 49.0 9.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 6.0 4.0 3.5 6.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s13.5 36.0 27.0 6.5 43.0 27.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s5.4 8.1 4.4 2.7 45.0 4.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 2.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 132.3 HCM 6th LOS F ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 213 of 217 HCM 6th TWSC 18: Santa Rosa Road & SR 41 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 18 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 369 41 31 1481 74 26 Future Vol, veh/h 369 41 31 1481 74 26 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 100 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 22722 Mvmt Flow 405 45 34 1627 81 29 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 450 0 2123 428 Stage 1 - - - - 428 - Stage 2 - - - - 1695 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1110 - ~ 55 627 Stage 1 - - - - 657 - Stage 2 - - - - 163 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1110 - ~ 53 627 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 130 - Stage 1 - - - - 657 - Stage 2 - - - - 158 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 62.9 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 164 - - 1110 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.67 - - 0.031 - HCM Control Delay (s) 62.9 - - 8.3 - HCM Lane LOS F - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3.9 - - 0.1 - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 214 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 19: Portola Road & SR 41 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 19 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 57 416 82 46 1470 17 44 26 41 11 46 29 Future Volume (veh/h) 57 416 82 46 1470 17 44 26 41 11 46 29 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1796 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 59 433 85 48 1531 18 46 27 43 11 48 30 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, %272272222222 Cap, veh/h 91 930 183 80 1135 1001 136 54 65 76 111 63 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.64 0.64 0.04 0.63 0.63 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1458 286 1781 1796 1585 529 505 610 120 1038 589 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 59 0 518 48 1531 18 116 0 0 89 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1745 1781 1796 1585 1644 0 0 1747 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 0.0 9.7 1.7 40.2 0.3 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.1 0.0 9.7 1.7 40.2 0.3 4.1 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.16 1.00 1.00 0.40 0.37 0.12 0.34 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 91 0 1112 80 1135 1001 255 0 0 250 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.00 0.47 0.60 1.35 0.02 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 210 0 1112 185 1135 1001 794 0 0 848 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.7 0.0 5.9 29.8 11.7 4.4 27.2 0.0 0.0 26.7 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.6 0.0 1.4 7.0 163.1 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 0.0 2.5 0.8 60.5 0.1 1.7 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 37.3 0.0 7.3 36.9 174.8 4.4 28.7 0.0 0.0 27.8 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A A D F A C A A C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 577 1597 116 89 Approach Delay, s/veh 10.4 168.8 28.7 27.8 Approach LOS B F C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 45.9 11.4 6.7 45.5 11.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 5.3 4.6 3.5 5.3 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.6 40.6 29.4 7.5 39.7 29.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.7 11.7 5.0 4.1 42.2 6.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 118.2 HCM 6th LOS F ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 215 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 20: Curbaril Ave & SR 41 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 20 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 23 40 18 72 36 34 6 400 93 60 1404 29 Future Volume (veh/h) 23 40 18 72 36 34 6 400 93 60 1404 29 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1796 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 24 41 19 74 37 35 6 412 96 62 1447 30 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 72272222222 Cap, veh/h 45 859 758 95 430 407 44 473 109 59 527 11 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.48 0.48 0.05 0.51 0.51 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1796 1585 1781 849 803 6 1473 340 50 1641 34 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 24 41 19 74 0 72 514 0 0 1539 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1796 1585 1781 0 1652 1820 0 0 1725 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.2 1.1 0.6 3.6 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.2 1.1 0.6 3.6 0.0 2.0 23.4 0.0 0.0 28.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.49 0.01 0.19 0.04 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 45 859 758 95 0 837 626 0 0 597 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.53 0.05 0.03 0.78 0.00 0.09 0.82 0.00 0.00 2.58 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 112 859 758 153 0 837 626 0 0 597 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh42.0 12.1 12.0 40.7 0.0 11.1 28.0 0.0 0.0 30.4 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.1 0.1 0.1 9.6 0.0 0.2 8.5 0.0 0.0 714.8 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.6 0.4 0.2 1.7 0.0 0.7 11.2 0.0 0.0 130.9 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 49.0 12.2 12.1 50.4 0.0 11.3 36.6 0.0 0.0 745.3 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B B D A B D A A F A A Approach Vol, veh/h 84 146 514 1539 Approach Delay, s/veh 22.7 31.1 36.6 745.3 Approach LOS C C D F Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s8.2 47.0 32.0 5.7 49.5 32.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 3.5 5.3 4.0 3.5 5.3 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s7.5 41.7 28.0 5.5 43.7 28.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s5.6 3.1 30.0 3.2 4.0 25.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 513.5 HCM 6th LOS F ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 216 of 217 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 21: Atascadero Ave & SR 41 07/26/2021 Base 12:00 am 08/03/2006 Baseline Synchro 11 Report Page 21 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 110 51 42 11 938 70 31 478 14 68 540 128 Future Volume (veh/h) 110 51 42 11 938 70 31 478 14 68 540 128 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1796 1870 1870 1796 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 121 56 46 12 1031 77 34 525 15 75 593 141 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 72272222222 Cap, veh/h 77 664 586 25 561 42 31 472 427 40 316 303 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.37 0.37 0.01 0.34 0.34 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1796 1585 1781 1651 123 113 1751 1585 209 1651 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 121 56 46 12 0 1108 559 0 15 668 0 141 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1796 1585 1781 0 1774 1865 0 1585 1860 0 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.0 2.3 2.2 0.8 0.0 39.1 31.0 0.0 0.8 22.0 0.0 9.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.0 2.3 2.2 0.8 0.0 39.1 31.0 0.0 0.8 22.0 0.0 9.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07 0.06 1.00 0.11 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 77 664 586 25 0 603 503 0 427 356 0 303 V/C Ratio(X) 1.56 0.08 0.08 0.49 0.00 1.84 1.11 0.00 0.04 1.88 0.00 0.46 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 77 664 586 77 0 603 503 0 427 356 0 303 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh55.0 23.6 23.5 56.3 0.0 38.0 42.0 0.0 31.0 46.5 0.0 41.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 306.4 0.0 0.0 5.4 0.0 383.1 74.5 0.0 0.0 405.4 0.0 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln8.8 1.0 0.8 0.4 0.0 80.6 24.3 0.0 0.3 50.3 0.0 3.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 361.4 23.6 23.6 61.7 0.0 421.0 116.5 0.0 31.0 451.9 0.0 41.7 LnGrp LOS F C C E A F F A C F A D Approach Vol, veh/h 223 1120 574 809 Approach Delay, s/veh 206.9 417.2 114.3 380.4 Approach LOS FFFF Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s5.6 47.8 26.0 9.0 44.4 35.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 5.3 4.0 4.0 5.3 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s5.0 39.1 22.0 5.0 39.1 31.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s2.8 4.3 24.0 7.0 41.1 33.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 325.3 HCM 6th LOS F ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 10/26/21 ATTACHMENT: 1A Page 217 of 217