Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC_2021-05-25_MinutesPUBLIC COMMENT PROVIDED BY EMAIL B. PUBLIC HEARINGS Item B-3 SUBMISSION FROM: Rick Derevan From: Rick Derevan <rickderevan@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 11:01 AM To: City Clerk <cityclerk@atascadero.org> Subject: Comment for agenda item B-3, May 25, 2021 meeting I am writing to oppose a portion of the planning and zoning text amendments, Item B-3 on the May 25, 2021, agenda–staff report beginning on page 111 of the agenda packet. Specifically, I oppose this proposed change: 4. A zoning amendment to increase the size of allowed accessory structures on certain conforming properties when particular performance standards can be met. This amendment would allow accessory structures such as workshops, storage barns and related to be constructed up to 100% of the size of a primary structure without the need for a conditional use permit. This change would harm neighbors and neighborhoods by doubling the size of accessory structures allowed. Under the zoning code, nonagricultural accessory buildings require only a five-foot setback from an adjoining property line. In my neighborhood, a property owner is proposing a 1,000 square foot workshop be placed five feet from our property line, which is very near a small, 1,000 square foot residence on our property. Since his home is 2,400 square feet, and attached garage 800 square feet, this new change would allow a 3,000 square foot "accessory" building to abut, and dwarf, the home on our property. Even 1,000 square feet is too much. This is not the rural living we signed up for when we bought this property nearly 20 years ago. I urge the City Council to reject this change. The staff report tries to justify this proposed change claiming that small residences on large properties create anomalies and a more costly process for applicants. These are not good justifications for this change and ignore the effect of allowing accessory buildings to equal the size of large residences, particularly given the very narrow setback requirements. If cost is the concern, lower the fees. But the point of zoning regulations is to protect the neighbors, neighborhoods, and ultimately, the city. This change has the possibility of green-lighting large land use changes without proper oversight that will adversely affect the city. Please reject this proposed change. Rick Derevan 5005 Cascabel Atascadero, CA 93422