Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet 07/24/2001
. r. .{ . . ; AGENDA 5918 X g s �1Di� ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, JULY 249 2001 7:00 P.M. ***NOTE LOCATION! ! *** San Benito School Auditorium 4300 San Benito Road, Atascadero REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT - CLOSED SESSION CLOSED SESSION: A. Call to Order 1) Conference with labor negotiator(Govt. Code Sec. 54957.6) Agency Negotiator: City Manager Employee organizations: Department Heads, Mid-Management/Professional, Confidential, Atascadero Fire Captains, Atascadero Firefighters, Service Employees Intl.Union Local 620, Atascadero Police Assoc. 2) Conference with legal counsel -Pending litigation(Govt. Code Sec. 54956.9) Cases: City of Atascadero v. PG&E Diamond v City of Atascadero B. Adjourn to Regular Session CLOSED SESSION REPORT REGULAR SESSION, 7:00 P.M.: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council Member Clay ROLL CALL: Mayor Arrambide Mayor Pro Tem Scalise Council Member Clay Council Member Johnson Council Member Luna APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to address the Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to five minutes. Please state your name and address for the record before making your presentation. The Council may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda.) COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative, Council Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities. Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. The Council may take action on items listed on the Agenda.) A. CONSENT CALENDAR: Roll Call (All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the item before action is taken.) 1. City Council Minutes—June 26, 2001 ■ City Clerk recommendation: Council approve the City Council minutes of June 26, 2001. [City Clerk] 2. May 2001 - Accounts Payable and Payroll ■ Fiscal Impact: $894, 742.23 ■ Staff recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for May 2001. [Administrative Services] 3. June 2001 -Accounts Payable and Payroll ■ Fiscal Impact: $1,706,488-45 ■ Staff recommendation: Council approve certified City accounts payable, payroll and payroll vendor checks for June 2001. [Administrative Services] 4. 2001-2001 Annual SpendingLimit ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council adopt the draft Resolution establishing the annual spending limit for fiscal year 2001-2002. [Administrative Services] 2 5. Zone Chanize 2001-0013 - Rancho De Paraiso (San Gabriel Road / Portal Road Escondido Road Area- City of Atascadero) ■ Fiscal Impact: None • ■ Staff recommendation: Council introduce the draft Ordinance,for second reading by title only, and adopt the draft Ordinance approving Zone Change 2001-0013 changing the zoning district within the Rancho De Paraiso Tract Map area from the Agriculture zoning district to the Residential Suburban zoning district. [Community Development] 6. Youth/ Community Center - State Grant Funds ■ Fiscal Impact: Approval of this Resolution will allow the City to apply for $492,000 in grant funds specifically allocated for the Atascadero Youth/Community Center. ■ Staff recommendation: Council approve the draft Resolution authorizing the City Manager to apply for grant funds from the State of California for the Atascadero Youth/Community Center. [Community Services] 7. "The Wood Nymphs" - Atascadero Art Association Request for Permission to Rehabilitate ■ Fiscal Impact: $10,000 from the Proposition 12 Per Capita funds has been allocated to the Wood Nymphs Restoration Project ■ Staff recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with the Atascadero Art Association to remove, restore, and re-install "The Wood Nymphs" marble statue located in Sunken Gardens and to allocate $10,000.00 in Proposition 12 Per Capita Grant funds to the Atascadero Art Association for this project. [Community Services] 8. Proposition 12 Per Capita Program Grant Funds ■ Fiscal Impact: This Resolution will allow the City of Atascadero to apply for $234,000 in grant funds specifically allocated for Parks and Recreation related improvements. ■ Staff recommendation: Council approve the draft Resolution authorizing the City Manager to apply for Grant Funds from the Per Capita Program under the Safe Neighborhood, Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. [Community Services] 8. Agreement with Atascadero Little League - for use of Paloma Creek Park Memorial Field ■ Fiscal Impact: Savings of an undetermined amount of staff time and supplies ■ Staff recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Atascadero Little League Baseball for the use and upkeep of Paloma Creek Park Memorial Field. [Community Services] 10. Public Safety Communication Center- Digital Recording System Purchase ■ Fiscal Impact: $13,804 provided entirely by LLEBG grant funds previously authorized by Council on December 12, 2000. ■ Staff recommendation: Council authorize the purchase of a Dynamic Instruments Brand Digital Recording System from Durham Communications. [Police] • 11. Repeater Component Purchase Authorization- Sealed Bid#2001-004 ■ Fiscal Impact: $15,566.75 provided entirely by grant funds previously authorized by Council on January 23, 2001. ■ Staff recommendation: Council authorize the purchase of Radio Repeater Components contained in Bid#2001-004 from Durham Communications. [Police] 3 12. Repeater Component Purchase Authorization- Sealed Bid#2001-005 ■ Fiscal Impact: $8,992.64 provided entirely by grant funds previously authorized by Council on January 23, 2001. ■ Staff recommendation: Council authorize the purchase of Radio Repeater Components contained in Bid#2001-005 from Applied Technology. [Police] 13. Repeater Component Purchase Authorization- Sealed Bid#2001-006 ■ Fiscal Impact: $15,53 0.16 provided entirely by grant funds previously authorized by Council on January 23, 2001. ■ Staff recommendation: Council authorize the purchase of Radio Repeater Components contained in Bid#2001-006 from Applied Technology. [Police] 14. Routes to School - San Gabriel Road and Santa Rosa Road ■ Fiscal Impact: $120,213.94 ■ Staff recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Whitaker Contractor, Inc. to construct the Route to School Project with a maximum project expenditure of $120,213.94 including contingencies and construction engineering and authorize the expenditure of$38, 313.94 in Streets and Bridge Impact Fees for this project. [Public Works] 15. Authorization to Purchase Vehicles -through the State Department of General Services ■ Fiscal Impact: $91,120.00 (in FY 01/02budget) ■ Staff recommendation: Council adopt the draft Resolution authorizing the State Department of General Services to, purchase vehicles on behalf of the City of Atascadero. [Public Works] 16. Public Highway Crossing Agreement- Union Pacific Railroad (Chico Road) ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with the Union Pacific Railroad Company establishing an easement for public access and allowing for improvement of the existing crossing. [Public Works] B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. GPA 2000-0001 General Plan Update- Review of Draft Land Use Plan ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Planning Commission recommendations: 1. Council adopt the draft Resolution, thereby endorsing the Draft Land Use Plan as the Preferred Plan for use in the Draft General Plan policy document and Draft Environmental Impact Report; and 2. Council direct staff to incorporate Policy Issues 1 through 10 into the Draft General Plan. [Community Development] 2. Atascadero Youth/Community Center- Purchase of Property ■ Fiscal Impact: $492,000.00 from the State of California grant and$55,000.00 from the Proposition 12 Per Capita funds allocated to the City of Atascadero ■ Staff recommendation: Council authorize the purchase of real property located at • 5493 Traffic Way for the purpose of renovation as a Youth / Community Center, contingent on the receipt of previously allocated State funds. [Community Services] 4 C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. Information Bulletin D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: (The following represent standing committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary.): Mayor Arrambide 1. S.L.O. Council of Governments(SLOCOG)/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority(SLORTA) 2. Water Committees 3. County Mayor's Round Table Mayor Pro Tem Scalise 1. Finance Committee 2. City/ Schools Committee 3. Economic Opportunity Commission(EOC) 4. Atascadero State Hospital Advisory Board Council Member Luna 1. Finance Committee 2. Integrated Waste Management Authority(IWMA) 3. North County Homeless Coalition • Council Member Johnson 1. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC) 2. Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCO) Council Member Clay 1. Air Pollution Control District(APCD) 2. City/ Schools Committee E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: 1. City Council 2. City Attorney 3. City Clerk a. Designation of Voting_Delegate - League of California Cities' Annual Conference 4. City Treasurer F. ADJOURNMENT: 5 Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. • I, Marcia McClure Torgerson, the City Clerk of the City of Atascadero, declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing agenda for the July 24, 2001 Regular Session of the Atascadero City Council was posted on July 18, 2001 at Atascadero City Hall, 6500 Palma Ave., Atascadero, CA 93422 and was available for public review in the City Clerk's office at that location. Signed this 18th day of July, 2001 at Atascadero, California. Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk City of Atascadero • • 6 City of Atascadero . WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber of City Hall. Matters are considered by the Council in the order of the printed Agenda. Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk(Room 311) available for public inspection during City Hall business hours. An agenda packet is also available for public review at the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road. Contracts, Resolutions and Ordinances will be allocated a number once they are approved by the City Council. The minutes of this meeting will reflect these numbers. In compliance with the:americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office, (805) 461-5010, or the City Clerk's Office, (805) 461-5074. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service. TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will give their report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being considered to step up to the podium. If you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way: • You must approach the podium and be recognized by the Mayor • Give your name and address(not required) • Make your statement • All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council • All comments limited to 5 minutes(unless changed by the Council) • No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so, and no one may speak more than twice on any item. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public comments will be heard by the Council. TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA Under Agenda item, "COMMUNITY FORUM", the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having business with the Council to: • Please approach the podium and be recognized • Give your name and address • State the nature of your business This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum(unless changed by the Council). • TO HAVE ITEMS PLACED ON AGENDA All business matters to appear on the Agenda must be in the Office of the City Manager ten days preceding the Council meeting. Should you have a matter you wish to bring before the Council,please mail or bring a written communication to the City Manager's office in City Hall prior to the deadline. ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 r.of6-r, Simi 1i lsi$ q 157-9 � cm DRAFT MINUTES ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 2001 7:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION: 1) Conference with labor negotiator(Govt. Code Sec. 54957.6) Agency Negotiator: City Manager Employee organizations: Department Heads, Mid-Management/Professional, Confidential, Atascadero Fire Captains, Atascadero Firefighters, Service Employees Intl. Union Local 620, Atascadero Police Assoc. 2) Conference with negotiator over real property. (Govt. Code 54956.8) Negotiator: City Manager Wade McKinney Property: Mrs. William Carroll, 5493 Traffic Way City Attorney Roy Hanley announced before the Council went into Closed Session that he would like to request the Council add an item to the Closed Session agenda: Discussion of settlement of pending litigation with Steven Diamond. (Govt. Code 54954.2, §b., §2.) MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Luna to include the requested item on the Closed Session agenda. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. City Attorney Roy Hanley announced there was no reportable action taken during the Closed Session. REGULAR SESSION, 7:00 P.M.: Mayor Arrambide called the meeting to order at 7:23 p.m. and Mayor Pro Tem Scalise led the Pledge of Allegiance. CC 06/26/01 Page 1 — ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 ROLL CALL: • Present: Council Members Clay, Luna, Johnson, Scalise and Mayor Arrambide Absent: None Others Present: City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry, Fire Chief Kurt Stone, Police Chief Dennis Hegwood, Community Development Director Lori Parcells, Public Works Director Steve Kahn, Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard, Principle Planner Warren Frace, Assistant Planner Jamie Kirk, Community Services Manager Geoff English, Public Works Technician Valerie Humphrey and City Attorney Roy Hanley. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Scalise to approve the agenda. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll call-vote. COMMUNITY FORUM: Mike Scherer, stated he represents the applicant on Item #13-3. He believes that this item will have a significant financial impact on Council Member Luna, and requested that he step down. Pearl Munak, 3850 Ramada Drive, President of the Homeless Housing Project, spoke concerning the Human Service Grants, which will be on the Council's agenda soon. She reported on the amount spent for the motel voucher program for the homeless in the past two years and requested that the Council give consideration to their application for a Human Services Grant in the amount of$4,000. Mayor Arrambide closed the Community Forum. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: Council Member Johnson stated he has recently attended several City Council budget meetings in other cities throughout the county and he thanked staff and the Finance Committee members for their excellent work on Atascadero's budget. CC 06/26/01 Page 2 _ 002 n 2 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 A. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. City Council Minutes—June 12, 2001 ■ City Clerk recommendation: Council approve the City Council minutes of June 12, 2001. [City Clerk] 2. Investment Policy - Proposed revisions ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ City Treasurer recommendation: Council adopt the draft Resolution adopting the revised City ofAtascadero Investment Policy dated 6126101. [City Treasurer] 3. Public Safety - Computer Aided Dispatch/Records Management System ■ Fiscal Impact: 1. $85,000.00 costs are provided in full by CLEEP grant funds designated for this purpose; and 2. Fiscal year 2001-2002: Saving of $4,500.00 due to termination of the maintenance agreement with the current vendor and use of the one-year warranty period with the new system; and 3. Fiscal year 2002-2003: Part of this fiscal year will be covered under warranty. The increase in annual recurring costs of$7,000 will commence upon the end of the warranty period. The anticipated increase in fiscal 2002-2003 is $4,750.00. ■ Staff recommendation: Council approve the use of technology grant finds to purchase the PS.Net Computer Aided Dispatch/Records Management System (CAD/RMS) software for use in the Public Safety Communications Center; and authorize the City Manager to execute a maintenance agreement with Abbey Group. [Police] 4. Disposition of Surplus City Vehicles ■ Fiscal Impact: An undetermined amount of revenue ■ Staff recommendation: Council declare the listed vehicles as surplus property and authorize the disposition of such vehicles. [Community Services] Council Member Luna requested that Item#A-4 be pulled. MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Clay to approve Items #A-1, 2 and 3 on the Consent Calendar. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Item #A-2- Resolution No. 2001- 020, Item #A-3- Contract No. 2001-017) Council Member Luna inquired of staff as to the possibility of City employees bidding on the auction items. City Attorney Roy Hanley stated the City's purchasing policy provides that in the event someone other than the City handles the auction, employees may purchase. MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Johnson to approve Item#A-4 on the Consent Calendar. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. CC 06/26/01 Page 3 — 003 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Downtown Parking & Business Improvement Area - (FY 2001-02) - Confirmation of Annual Assessment ■ Fiscal Impact: Revenue of approximately$10,000 annually. Staff recommendation: Council: L Adopt the draft Resolution confirming annual assessment for Downtown Parking & Business Improvement Area (Fiscal Year 2001-02); and 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with the Atascadero Main Street, Inc. entitled "An Agreement for Administration of Parking and Business Improvement Area Funds." [City Manager] City Manager Wade McKinney presented the staff report and answered questions of Council. PUBLIC COMMENT Mike Lucas, 8315 Atascadero Ave, Treasurer of the Atascadero Main Street Board, requested the following clause be added to the proposed contract: "The City will provide at no charge facilities for Main Street Board meetings on an as needed basis in a City-owned building." Mayor Arrambide closed Public Comment. MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Clay to adopt the draft Resolution confirming annual assessment for Downtown Parking & Business Improvement Area; and Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with the Atascadero Main Street, Inc., entitled "An Agreement for Administration of Parking and Business Improvement Area Funds," with the following addition: "The City will provide, at no charge, facilities for the Main Street Board meetings on an as-needed basis in a City-owned building at the discretion of the City Manager. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Resolution No. 2001-021, Contract No. 2001-018) 2. Sewer Service Charges - Placement on the 2001-02 Property Tax Rolls ■ Fiscal Impact: Revenue of$1,384,996 82 ■ Staff recommendation: Council adopt the draft Resolution, adopting service charges to be added to the 2001-02 property tax rolls, at the conclusion of the Public Hearing. [Public Works] Public Works Director Steve Kahn presented the staff report and answered questions of Council. PUBLIC COMMENT—None CC 06/26/01 Page 4 _ 004 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Clay to approve the draft Resolution adopting the service charge to be added to the 2001-02 property tax rolls at the conclusion of this hearing. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Resolution No. 2001-022) Mayor Arrambide declared a 10-minute recess to allow Council Member Luna to check on the distance from his property to the site of the project to be considered in Item #13-3. Mayor Arrambide called the meeting to order and indicated a graphic on the overhead that showed the project area under consideration in Item #13-3, as well as Council Member Luna's property. It was determined that Council Member Luna's property was approximately 2,150 feet from the nearest point of the project. Council Member Luna stated as a result of this information, he will participate in Item#13-3. 3. Tentative Tract Map 2000-0001 (Tract 2396) and Road Abandonment 2001-0003 - (Rancho De Paraiso / San Gabriel Road/Portal Road/Escondido Road area) ■ Fiscal Impact: The project would likely have a slight negative impact on City revenues. As a general rule, single-family dwellings require services that exceed the revenue generated by the dwelling. ■ Planning Commission recommendations: Council: 1. Adopt draft Resolution A, certifying the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2001-0006; and 2. Adopt draft Resolution B, approving Road Abandonment 2001-0002, a request to abandon a portion of the Portal Road colony right-of-way and the realignment of the existing Escondido Road colony right-of-way, based on the appropriate findings and subject to the Conditions of Approval; and 3. Adopt draft Resolution C, thereby approving Tentative Tract Map 2000-0001, a request to subdivide 69.39 acres into 17 lots, based on the appropriate findings and subject to the Conditions of Approval. [Community Development] Community Development Director Lori Parcells introduced Associate Planner Jamie Kirk who presented the staff report to Council. Public Works Director Steve Kahn presented to Council the public improvements proposed by staff. The Council asked for clarification on fire access and safety, tree mitigation, public improvements, and the creek crossing. PUBLIC COMMENT Ken Wilson, representative of the Larson Family Trust, stated he would like to express the applicant's concern concerning six points: 1. Road Improvements, 2. Fire Road — request elimination, 3. Tree mitigation— 13 acres of open space is adequate mitigation, 4. Perk tests — CC 06/26/01 Page 5 0 0 J ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 would like this requirement waived per lot; would do four perk tests as samples, 5. Eliminate Condition#63, and 6. Add to end of Condition#80 "or as approved by AMWC." Mike Mello, 10275 Escondido Road,-expressed his concern for the approval of the extension of the fire road down through Portal Road. Otherwise, he supports the proposal. Wally Greenaway, 10705 Portal Road, stated he supports the extension of Escondido Road through to San Gabriel Road. Larry Booth, 10810 Escondido Road, indicated that he is in favor of the extension of Escondido Road. Wolfgang John, 10920 Portal Road, stated he supports the proposal. He asked if there would be follow up after tree mitigation measures have been taken. Beverly Booth, 10810 Escondido Road, expressed her support of the proposed project. Joan O'Keefe, 9985 Old Morro Road East, stated the planting of trees as tree mitigation does not involve follow up which means many of the trees die from lack of care. Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period. MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Scalise and seconded by Council Member Clay to adopt draft Resolution A certifying the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 2001-0006. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Resolution No. 2001-023) MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Council Member Clay to adopt draft Resolution B, approving Road Abandonment 2001- 0002, a request to abandon a portion of the Portal Road colony right- of-way and the realignment of the existing Escondido Road colony right-of-way, based on the appropriate findings and subject to the Conditions of Approval. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Resolution No. 2001-024) MOTION: By Council Member Johnson and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Scalise to adopt draft Resolution C, approving Tentative Tract Map 2000-0001, a request to subdivide 69.39 acres into 17 lots, based on the appropriate findings and subject to the Conditions of Approval with the following amendments: 1. Condition of Approval #8: As proposed, the 13+/- acres Tree Conservation Easement shall be recorded on the final map in lieu of the payment of tree mitigation fees. The following text will be added, "If the total dbh to be removed from the site is reduced through design changes in the project, the on-site tree CC 06/26/01 Page 6 _ 006 06 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 replacement mitigation requirement shall be adjusted accordingly. Any mitigation adjustment shall be calculated consistent with the Atascadero Native Tree Ordinance." 2. Condition of Approval #25: Deletion of, "engineered septic systems with." 3. Condition of Approval 952: Deletion of statement above Condition of Approval #52 under the title "Streets." 4. Leave in the Conditions of Approval#52-67. 5. Deletion of Condition of Approval#58. 6. Condition of Approval#75: The following text will be added to the end of the last sentence, "or as approved by the Atascadero Mutual Water Company." 7. Deletion of the Condition of Approval#81. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Resolution No. 2001-025) 4. Zone Change 2001-0013 - Rancho De Paraiso (San Gabriel Road / Portal Road / Escondido Road Area-City of Atascadero) ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Planning Commission recommendation: Council introduce the draft Ordinance, for first reading by title only, approving Zone Change 2001-0013 changing the zoning district within the Rancho De Paraiso Tract Map area from the Agriculture zoning district to the Residential Suburban zoning district. [Community Development] Associate Planner Jamie Kirk presented the staff report. PUBLIC COMMENT - None MOTION: By Council Member Clay and seconded by Council Member Johnson to introduce the draft Ordinance, for first reading by title only, approving Zone Change 2001-0013 changing the zoning district within the Rancho De Paraiso Tract Map area from the Agriculture zoning district to the Residential Suburban zoning district. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. Mayor Arrambide called a recess at 9:30 p.m. Mayor Arrambide called the meeting to order at 9:45 p.m. CC 06/26/01 Page 7 — 007 ITEM NUMBER: A- I DATE: 07/24/2001 C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. Circulation Improvement Report - and 2002 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council receive this report on proposed circulation improvements for Atascadero and the 2002 STIP and provide direction to staff on the proposed STSIP nominations. [Public Works] Council Member Clay announced he would be stepping down as part of this report concerns the Curbaril Bridge. Public Works Director Steve Kahn gave the staff report and answered questions of Council. PUBLIC COMMENT Joan O'Keefe, 9985 Old Morro Road East, asked if there was a timeframe for the Traffic Way improvements and requested clarification on the issue of funneling the traffic into the downtown. City Engineer Kahn addressed Mrs. O'Keefe's questions. Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period. The City Council accepted the report on proposed circulation improvements for Atascadero and the 2002 STIP. 2. Energy Conservation Measures ■ Fiscal Impact: Approximately S1,650.00. Also, a projected annual savings of approximately S10,000.00 to S14,000.00. ■ Staff recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to implement specified measures to reduce the City's consumption of electricity. [Community Services] Community Services Manager Geoff English presented the staff report and answered questions of Council. PUBLIC COMMENT Joan O'Keefe, 9985 Old Morro Road East, asked why the wastewater energy costs were being included when wastewater pays for itself. Mr. Kahn explained that the City is reviewing all its energy costs. Mayor Arrambide closed the Public Comment period 0 CC 06/26/01 Page 8 008 ITEM NUMBER: A- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Clay to authorize the City Manager to implement specified measures to reduce the City's consumption of electricity. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: Mayor Arrambide 1. County Mayor's Round Table: Issue discussed was the League of California Cities Grassroots Initiative. There is good support for this initiative in the County. Council Member Luna 1. ECHO: Will be going into business with the approval of staff. Council Member Johnson 1. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors (EVC): There was a reception for CALED over the weekend and Chris McKinzie from the League of Cities indicated that the ballot referendum on behalf of the City is moving forward. 2. Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCO): Will be an independent agency on the first of the month, and its offices will be on Pacific Avenue. E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: None F. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Arrambide adjourned the meeting at 10:42 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting on July 24`x'. MEETING RECORDED AND MINUTES PREPARED BY: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk CC 06/26/01 Page 9 — 009 ITEM NUMBER: A—2 e Mimi° Fit °'�� 7/24/2001 DATE Isis A Wi 1979 Atascadero City Council Staff Report-Administrative Services Department MAY 2001 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE & PAYROLL RECOMMENDATION Approve certified City accounts payable,payroll and payroll vendor checks for May 2001. DISCUSSION Attached for City Council review and approval are the following: Payroll . Dated 5/10/01 Checks # 9812 9954 $ 150,326.51 Dated 5/24/01 Checks# 9955 - 10097 162,009.46 Accounts Payable Dated May. 1-31, 2001 Checks # 78917 - 79262 & EFTs 582,406.26 TOTAL AMOUNT $ 894,742.23 FISCAL IMPACT Total expenditures for all funds is $ 894,742.23 CERTIFICATION The undersigned certifies that the attached demands have been released for payment and that funds are available for these demands. Rachelle Rickard,Administrative Services Director Approved by the City Council at a meeting held July 24, 2001. Marcia M. Torgerson, City Clerk ATTACHMENT: May 2001 Eden Warrant Register in the amount of $ 582,406.26 010 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of May 2001 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description _Amo 37087545 5/1/01 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 28,781.13 78917 5/2/01 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 265.94 78918 5/4/01 ACTIVE.COM,INC. Accounts Payable Check 743.65 78919 5/4/01 ADVANCED VISUALS&COMPU,INC. Accounts Payable Check 3,559.75 78920 5/4/01 AMERICAN WEST TIRE&AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 336.72 78921 5/4/01 ANDERSON'S AUTO SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 554.72 78922 5/4/01 ARAMARK Accounts Payable Check 395.09 78923 5/4/01 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 428.77 78924 5/4/01 ATASCADERO BABE RUTH BASEBALL Accounts Payable Check 385.20 78925 5/4/01 ATASCADERO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Accounts Payable Check 540.00 78926 5/4/01 ATASCADERO COMMUNITY Accounts Payable Check 6,000.00 78927 5/4/01 ATASCADERO FORD Accounts Payable Check 609.48 78928 5/4/01 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 3,251.80 78929 5/4/01 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 1,573.59 78930 _ 5/4/01 ATASCADERO SAW SHOP Accounts Payable Check 71.60 78931 5/4/01 ATASCADERO UPHOLSTERY Accounts Payable Check so 78932 5/4/01 ATASCADERO YOUTH FOOTBALL Accounts Payable Check 250.00 78933 5/4/01 CINDY K.BENSON Accounts Payable Check 455.00 78934 5/4/01 BRENDLER JANITORIAL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 1,000.00 78935 5/4/01 BYHAM,CHRIS Accounts Payable Check 90.00 78936 5/4/01 CAL-COAST REFRIGERATION,INC Accounts Payable Check 2,035.70 78937 5/4/01 CELLULARONE Accounts Payable Check 134.18 78938 5/4/01 BRADY CHERRY Accounts Payable Check 300.00 78939 5/4/01 CHEVRON Accounts Payable Check 306.18 78940 5/4/01 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 173.40 78941 5/4/01 CJP PRODUCTIONS Accounts Payable Check 26,305.00 78942 3/4/01 VINCE CONDE Accounts Payable Check 150.00 78943 5/4/01 CIMON CORMIER Accounts Payable Check 237.00 78944 5/4/01 COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ASSR Accounts Payable Check 157.55 78945 5/4/01 CRM FILMS Accounts Payable Check 771.50 78946 5/4/01 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 115.00 78947 5/4/01 CSFA Accounts Payable Check 100.00 78948 5/4/01 CUESTA EQUIPMENT Accounts Payable Check0 78949 5/4/01 DAN BIDDLE PEST CONTROL SERVIC Accounts Payable Check 010 011 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of May 2001 Check Check umber Date Vendor Description Amount 78950 5/4/01 DARRYL'S LOCK AND SAFE Accounts Payable Check 20.33 78951 5/4/01 DATAPRINT CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 181.05 78952 5/4/01 DAVID M FLEISHMAN Accounts Payable Check 800.00 78953 5/4/01 DAN DAVIS Accounts Payable Check 213.50 78954 5/4/01 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 686.11 78955 5/4/01 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Accounts Payable Check 78.00 78956 5/4/01 DISPLAY SALES Accounts Payable Check 48.95 78957 5/4/01 SAMANTHA DOLE Accounts Payable Check 24.00 78958 5/4/01 DOOLEY ENTERPRISES INC Accounts Payable Check 363.80 78959 5/4/01 BOB EDMONDS Accounts Payable Check 35.00 78960 5/4/01 GEOFF ENGLISH Accounts Payable Check 84.11 78961 5/4/01 ESCUELA DEL RIO Accounts Payable Check 67.60 78962 5/4/01 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 240.61 78963 5/4/01 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 42.00 78964 5/4/01 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL Accounts Payable Check 421.20 78965 5/4/01 FIVE STAR CARTRIDGES Accounts Payable Check 85.33 78966 5/4/01 JOANN FONTAINE Accounts Payable Check 14.00 78967 5/4/01 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 225.23 78968 5/4/01 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 608.50 78969 5/4/01 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 337.21 78970 5/4/01 MIKE GIL Accounts Payable Check 90.00 78971 5/4/01 STELLA GILBERT Accounts Payable Check 48.00 78972 5/4/01 KENNETH GLYNN Accounts Payable Check 189.00 78973 5/4/01 GOULD PUBLICATIONS,INC Accounts Payable Check 169.50 78974 5/4/01 MARK GREENAWAY Accounts Payable Check 450.00 78975 5/4/01 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 1.90 78976 5/4/01 GT DISTRIBUTORS,INC Accounts Payable Check 820.55 78977 5/4/01 H.D.PETERSON Accounts Payable Check 178.40 78978 5/4/01 HALLETT'S BACKHOE SERVICE,INC Accounts Payable Check 7,900.00 78979 5/4/01 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 329.07 78980 5/4/01 YVONNE HELMS Accounts Payable Check 24.00 78981 5/4/01 HENRY SCHEIN,INC. Accounts Payable Check 180.59 78982 5/4/01 HOME DEPOT Accounts Payable Check 225.86 78983 5/4/01 CHERYL HOSIER Accounts Payable Check 14.05 78984 5/4/01 JERAD L.HUTCHINSON Accounts Payable Check 60.00 78985 5/4/01 INGRAM&GREENE SANITATION CO Accounts Payable Check 100.00 012 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of May 2001 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amou 78986 5/4/01 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF Accounts Payable Check 50.00 78987 5/4/01 J.CARROLL Accounts Payable Check 259.80 78988 5/4/01 JACOBS ROOFING Accounts Payable Check 2,956.00 78989 5/4/01 EDWARD P.JARDINI Accounts Payable Check 162.00 78990 5/4/01 JIFFY LUBE#1932 PCJL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 56.08 78991 5/4/01 STEVEN KAHN Accounts Payable Check 300.00 78992 5/4/01 CHUCK KENDRICK Accounts Payable Check 102.00 78993 5/4/01 NICHOLAS KENNEDY Accounts Payable Check 175.00 78994 5/4/01 JAMIE KIRK Accounts Payable Check 69.44 78995 5/4/01 DEBBIE LARSON Accounts Payable Check 271.00 78996 5/4/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGETS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 133.80 78997 5/4/01 LEADS SOFTWARE GROUP INC. Accounts Payable Check 348.00 78998 5/4/01 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO.INC Accounts Payable Check 3,825.00 78999 5/4/01 LEMOS FEED&PET SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 53.48 79000 5/4/01 JACK LICARI Accounts Payable Check 865.00 79001 5/4/01 TERI LIPPER Accounts Payable Check 50.40 79002 5/4/01 RUDY LORTON Accounts Payable Check 130 79003 5/4/01 LYNDON'S AUTOMOTIVE Accounts Payable Check 93 79004 5/4/01 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 729.47 79005 5/4/01 SAM MCMILLAN Accounts Payable Check 15.00 79006 5/4/01 MD COMMUNICATIONS Accounts Payable Check 3,956.58 79007 5/4/01 CORY MEYER Accounts Payable Check 120.00 79008 5/4/01 KEN MEYER Accounts Payable Check 30.00 79009 5/4/01 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW Accounts Payable Check 24.74 79010 5/4/01 MIDTOWN SPORTS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 4,268.08 79011 5/4/01 MIKE HOWE'S AUTOMOTIVE Accounts Payable Check 322.66 79012 5/4/01 KEVIN MILLER Accounts Payable Check 102.00 79013 5/4/01 PAUL MILLER Accounts Payable Check 136.00 79014 5/4/01 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 68.02 79015 5/4/01 MITCH FREDERICK SEALCOATING Accounts Payable Check 340.00 79016 5/4/01 MOORE'S WESTERN NURSERY Accounts Payable Check 34.56 79017 5/4/01 ALICIA MORIN Accounts Payable Check 30.00 79018 5/4/01 MUSIC FACTORY Accounts Payable Check 480.43 79019 5/4/01 LAURIE NAPOLI Accounts Payable Check 79020 5/4/01 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION Accounts Payable Check 013 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of May 2001 &Check Check mber Date Vendor Description Amount 79021 5/4/01 TIM O'MEARA Accounts Payable Check 102.00 79022 5/4/01 O.C.TANNER Accounts Payable Check 117.69 79023 5/4/01 PACIFIC BELL Accounts Payable Check 759.73 79024 5/4/01 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 320.50 79025 5/4/01 PACIFIC HOME DO IT CENTER Accounts Payable Check 91.51 79026 5/4/01 PAPER WORKS Accounts Payable Check 61.26 79027 5/4/01 LORI PARCELLS Accounts Payable Check 300.00 79028 5/4/01 PASO ROBLES ELECTRIC,INC. Accounts Payable Check 20.70 79029 5/4/01 PASO ROBLES GLASS SHOP Accounts Payable Check 1,966.00 79030 5/4/01 PASO ROBLES SUPERIOR COURT Accounts Payable Check 70.00 79031 5/4/01 PERRY'S PARCEL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 22.90 79032 5/4/01 PETE JOHNSTON CHEVROLET Accounts Payable Check 43.48 79033 5/4/01 FIRE DEPARTMENT PETTY CASH Accounts Payable Check 100.47 79034 5/4/01 PLF,INC. Accounts Payable Check 208.59 79035 5/4/01 POSTAL PRIVILEGE Accounts Payable Check 238.88 79036 5/4/01 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION,INC. Accounts Payable Check 65.18 79037 5/4/01 PROCARE JANITORIAL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 379.85 79038 5/4'01 ROBIN PUDEWA Accounts Payable Check 24.00 79039 5/4/01 QUAIL UNLIMITED Accounts Payable Check 280.00 79040 5/4/01 QUILL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 518.66 79041 5/4/01 RADIO SHACK Accounts Payable Check 337.33 79042 5/4/01 RETIRED OFFICERS ASSC Accounts Payable Check 13.00 79043 5/4/01 REVENUE&COST SPECIALISTS LLC Accounts Payable Check 5,200.00 79044 5/4/01 CAROLE ROBINSON Accounts Payable Check 9.50 79045 5/4/01 STEVE ROMO Accounts Payable Check 90.00 79046 5/4/01 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SHERIFF Accounts Payable Check 9,157.50 79047 5/4/01 STEVE SANDEFFER Accounts Payable Check 120.00 79048 5/4/01 PAULA SANDIFER Accounts Payable Check 250.00 79049 5/4/01 SANTA MARIA TIRE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 372.06 79050 5/4/01 MICHELE SCHAMBER Accounts Payable Check 128.98 79051 5/4/01 LISETTE SCHOLL Accounts Payable Check 114.10 79052 5/4/01 GRACE PUCCI,SECRETARIAL SERVICES BY GRAC Accounts Payable Check 465.00 79053 5/4/01 JOHN SIEMENS Accounts Payable Check 214.00 79054 5/4/01 SIR SPEEDY Accounts Payable Check 210.36 79055 5/4/01 SLOCOMOTION Accounts Payable Check 132.68 79056 5/4/01 JILL SMETHERS Accounts Payable Check 169.71 014 City of Ataseadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of May 2001 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amou4s 79057 5/4/01 SO.CALIF.MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC Accounts Payable Check 900.00 79058 5/4/01 SOUZA CONSTRUCTION INC. Accounts Payable Check 25,017.58 79059 5/4/01 STERLING COMMUNICATIONS Accounts Payable Check 69.20 79060 5/4/01 TAYLOR RENTAL Accounts Payable Check 153.75 79061 5/4/01 TERRY&PAULSON ENTERPRISE INC Accounts Payable Check 499.77 79062 5/4/01 TOM FLYNN&SONS Accounts Payable Check 900.00 79063 5/4/01 TRANSPORTABLE TREATMENT SVCS Accounts Payable Check 22,146.00 79064 5/4/01 U.S.POSTMASTER Accounts Payable Check 125.00 79065 5/4/01 UNION ASPHALT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 404.98 79066 5/4/01 UNITED GREEN MARK,INC. Accounts Payable Check 653.41 79067 5/4/01 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 396.02 79068 5/4/01 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 355.90 79069 5/4/01 TINA VILLALON Accounts Payable Check 102.00 79070 5/4/01 WAL-MART,INC. Accounts Payable Check 214.45 79071 5/4/01 TODD WALKER Accounts Payable Check 147.00 79072 5/4/01 WESTERN FARM SERVICE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 690.15 79073 5/4/01 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 79074 5/4/01 WHELEN ENGINEERING CO.,INC Accounts Payable Check 500 79075 5/11/01 ATASCADERO FED.CREDIT UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 5,675.00 79076 5/11/01 ATASCADERO FIRE DEPT EMP.ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 210.00 79077 5/11/01 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 40.00 79078 5111101 ASSOCIATION ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS Payroll Vendor Payment 365.50 79079 5/11/01 COUNTY-CITY EMPLOYEES CU Payroll Vendor Payment 895.00 79080 5/11/01 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 6,133.47 79081 5/11/01 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Accounts Payable Check 2,299.00 79082 5/11/01 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 634.87 79083 5/11/01 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 261.69 79084 5/11/01 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 6,268.69 79085 5/11/01 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Payroll Vendor Payment 500.00 79086 5/11/01 KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS Payroll Vendor Payment 47.00 79087 5/11/01 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM Payroll Vendor Payment 19.85 79088 5/11/01 PUBLIC EMPL RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 18,514.34 79089 5/11/01 SEIU LOCAL 620 AFL-CIO Payroll Vendor Payment 409.61 79090 5/11/01 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 79091 5/11/01 UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY Payroll Vendor Payment 4 .00 015 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of May 2001 Check Check umber Date Vendor Description Amount 79092 5/11/01 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 690.50 79093 5/11/01 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 432.00 79094 5/15/01 PAUL BEBEAU Accounts Payable Check 248.00 79095 5/15/01 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO Payroll Vendor Payment 631.05 79096 5/15/01 COLONIAL LIFE&ACCIDENT INS. Payroll Vendor Payment 2,142.34 79097 5/15/01 CPIC LIFE Payroll Vendor Payment 1,415.55 79098 5/15/01 DELTA DENTAL,ATTN:ACCOUNTING Payroll Vendor Payment 6,359.10 79099 5/15/01 EQUITABLE LIFE Payroll Vendor Payment 348.88 79100 5/15/01 LIFEGUARD Payroll Vendor Payment 30 205.21 79101 5/15/01 TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL LIFE Accounts Payable Check 115.16 38617407 5/15/01 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 29 418.52 79102 5/16/01 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 3,350.01 79103 5/16/01 MIKE ALOI Accounts Payable Check 125.00 79104 5/16/01 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 101.38 79105 5/16/01 AMERICAN SANITATION Accounts Payable Check 192.60 79106 5/16/01 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS Accounts Payable Check 769.80 79107 5/16/01 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 245.38 79108 5/16/01 ATASCADERO ASSOCIATION OF Accounts Payable Check 50.00 79109 5/16/01 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 44.43 79110 5/16/01 AVAYA INC. Accounts Payable Check 22.31 79111 5/16/01 PAUL BEBEAU Accounts Payable Check 372.00 79112 5/16/01 BRENDLER JANITORIAL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 400.00 79113 5/16/01 HARRY BURTON Accounts Payable Check 244.16 79114 5/16/01 CAL-COAST REFRIGERATION,INC Accounts Payable Check 908.09 79115 5/16/01 CALIF DEPT OF FORESTRY&FIRE Accounts Payable Check 30.00 79116 5/16/01 CALIFORNIA INTERNET CONNECTION Accounts Payable Check 19.95 79117 5/16/01 CASHIERS OFFICE Accounts Payable Check 60.00 79118 5/16/01 CCO INTERNET SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 722.00 79119 5/16/01 CDW GOVERNMENT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 3,657.99 79120 5/16/01 CELSOC Accounts Payable Check 97.60 79121 5/16/01 CENTRAL COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT Accounts Payable Check 300.00 79122 5/16/01 CENTRAL COAST SEA FOOD Accounts Payable Check 222.75 79123 5/16/01 CFMA Accounts Payable Check 385.00 79124 5/16/01 CHEVRON Accounts Payable Check 343.02 79125 5/16/01 CHEVRON Accounts Payable Check 1,392.05 016 City of Atascadero Disbursement ListinR For the Month of May 2001 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amou 79126 5/16/01 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00 79127 5/16/01 COAST ELECTRONICS Accounts Payable Check 1,064.65 79128 5/16/01 COAST SATELLITE TV&HOME Accounts Payable Check 202.23 79129 5/16/01 CLAUDIA COLLIER Accounts Payable Check 204.26 79130 5/16/01 VINCE CONDE Accounts Payable Check 60.00 79131 5/16/01 CIMON CORMIER Accounts Payable Check 120.00 79132 5/16/01 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 47.00 79133 5/16/01 CUSTOM SEWING&ALTERATIONS Accounts Payable Check 6.00 79134 5/16/01 DARRYUS LOCK AND SAFE Accounts Payable Check 6.42 79135 5/16/01 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 969.94 79136 5/16/01 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 91.04 79137 5/16/01 EL CAMINO BUILDING SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 25.36 79138 5/16/01 EL CAMINO VETERINARY HOSP Accounts Payable Check 41.50 79139 5/16/01 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 54.98 79140 5/16/01 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 34.95 79141 5/16/01 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL Accounts Payable Check 32.40 79142 5/16/01 FIRSTLINE,LLC Accounts Payable Check 1 40 79143 5/16/01 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 13 79144 5/16/01 FOX&SOHAGI,LLP Accounts Payable Check 1,090.75 79145 5/16/01 FRAZEE PAINTS Accounts Payable Check 242.25 79146 5/16/01 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00 79147 5/16/01 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 394.37 79148 5/16/01 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00 79149 5/16/01 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 439.00 79150 5/16/01 MARK GREENAWAY Accounts Payable Check 900.00 79151 5/16/01 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 36.96 79154 5/16/01 GST CALL AMERICA Accounts Payable Check 450.91 79155 5/16/01 H.D.PETERSON Accounts Payable Check 17.01 79156 5/16/01 HARMONY MACHINE&WELDING Accounts Payable Check 32.50 79157 5/16/01 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 272.88 79158 5/16/01 REGIONALD HICKS Accounts Payable Check 125.00 79159 5/16/01 JERAD L.HUTCHINSON Accounts Payable Check 30.00 79160 5/16/01 ICMA Accounts Payable Check 778.99 79161 5/16/01 INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION Accounts Payable Check 2 jj 79162 5/16/01 VOID Accounts Payable Check 79163 5/16/01 INSTASHRED SECURITY SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 42.00 017 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of May 2001 jftCheck Check umber Date Vendor Description Amount 79164 5/16/01 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF Accounts Payable Check 195.00 79165 5/16/01 J.CHRISTOPHER TOEWS Accounts Payable Check 547.50 79166 5/16/01 JESPERSEN'S TIRE SERVICE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 264.40 79167 5/16/01 RAY JOHNSON Accounts Payable Check 80.91 79168 5/16/01 K-MART Accounts Payable Check 33.35 79169 5/16/01 CHUCK KENDRICK Accounts Payable Check 51.00 79170 5/16/01 LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 17 012.31 79171 5/16/01 LIFE ASSIST,INC. Accounts Payable Check 175.31 79172 5/16/01 TERI LIPPER Accounts Payable Check 69.30 79173 5/16/01 LONGS DRUG STORES Accounts Payable Check 7.42 79174 5/16/01 LOOKOUT SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 485.73 79175 5/16/01 RUDY LORTON Accounts Payable Check 102.00 79176 5/16/01 LYNN CARD COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 131.50 79177 5/16/01 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK,INC. Accounts Payable Check 258.00 79178 5/16/01 JOHN MARTINO Accounts Payable Check 135.00 79179 5/16/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 4093 Accounts Payable Check 213.00 79180 5/16/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 4101 Accounts Payable Check 880.00 79181 5/16/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 4135 Accounts Payable Check 589.87 79182 5/16/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 4150 Accounts Payable Check 686.62 79183 5/16/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 4168 Accounts Payable Check 219.16 79184 5/16/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 6082 Accounts Payable Check 40.69 79185 5/16/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 6090 Accounts Payable Check 980.05 79186 5/16/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 6108 Accounts Payable Check 60.00 79187 5/16/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 9902 Accounts Payable Check 357.24 79188 5/16/01 BECKY MAXWELL Accounts Payable Check 50.60 79189 5/16/01 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 175.00 79190 5/16/01 KEVIN MILLER Accounts Payable Check 51.00 79191 5/16/01 PAUL MILLER Accounts Payable Check 85.00 79192 5/16/01 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 165.10 79193 5/16/01 MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORP Accounts Payable Check 444.83 79194 5/16/01 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00 79195 5/16/01 MYERS-STEVENS AND CO.,INC. Accounts Payable Check 94.50 79196 5/16/01 NEW TIMES Accounts Payable Check 306.00 79198 5/16/01 NORTH COAST ENGINEERING INC. Accounts Payable Check 25,057.95 79199 5/16/01 NORTH COUNTY GLASS Accounts Payable Check 310.60 018 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listinl? For the Month of May 2001 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amon 79200 5/16/01 TIM O'MEARA Accounts Payable Check 51.00 79201 5/16/01 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN Accounts Payable Check 483.08 79202 5/16/01 OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 100.99 79203 5/16/01 PACIFIC BELL Accounts Payable Check 645.80 79205 5/16/01 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 38,715.75 79206 5/16/01 PACIFIC HOME DO IT CENTER Accounts Payable Check 185.61 79207 5/16/01 PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALTIES Accounts Payable Check 4,219.14 79208 5/16/01 PANASONIC COMMUNICATIONS Accounts Payable Check 944.55 79209 5/16/01 PENNY MEN Accounts Payable Check 200.20 79210 5/16/01 PETE JOHNSTON CHEVROLET Accounts Payable Check 0.88 79211 5/16/01 PLAYERS RESTAURANT Accounts Payable Check 13.50 79212 5/16/01 QUILL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 749.49 79213 5/16/01 RAINBOW MEALWORMS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 58.91 79214 5/16/01 RDJ SPECIALTIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 83.63 79215 5/16/01 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 80.25 79216 5/16/01 RELIABLE PROTEIN PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 922.44 79217 5/16/01 LINDA RODGERS Accounts Payable Check 33# 79218 5/16/01 STEVE ROMO Accounts Payable Check 3 79219 5/16/01 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FIRE Accounts Payable Check 50.00 79220 5/16/01 SAN LUIS SURGICAL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 26.75 79221 5/16/01 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00 79222 5/16/01 NOEL SHUTT Accounts Payable Check 244.16 79223 5/16/01 SIERRA VISTA REGIONAL MED CTR Accounts Payable Check 33.50 79224 5/16/01 TOM SILVA Accounts Payable Check 102.00 79225 5/16/01 SLO COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT Accounts Payable Check 225.00 79226 5/16/01 SLOCAPRA Accounts Payable Check 30.00 79227 5/16/01 KURT W.STONE Accounts Payable Check 35.00 79228 5/16/01 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIERS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 550.07 79229 5/16/01 TEMPLETON FEED&GRAIN Accounts Payable Check 315.68 79230 5/16/01 TODD PIPE&SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 1,583.60 79231 5/16/01 MARCIA TORGERSON Accounts Payable Check 636.20 79232 5/16/01 TRIBUNE Accounts Payable Check 575.23 79233 5/16/01 U.S.POSTMASTER Accounts Payable Check 1,216.27 79234 5/16/01 U.S.POSTMASTER Accounts Payable Check 1,32 79235 5/16/01 UNISOURCE MAINT SUPPLY SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 1 4D 79236 5/16/01 UNOCAL Accounts Payable Check 3,841.81 019 City of Ataseadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of May 2001 Check Check umber Date Vendor Description Amount 79237 5/16/01 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 309.82 79238 5/16/01 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 210.05 79239 5/16/01 TINA VILLALON Accounts Payable Check 204.00 79240 5/16/01 ERIC VITALE Accounts Payable Check 10.64 79241 5/16/01 TODD WALKER Accounts Payable Check 24.50 79242 5/16/01 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 122.65 79243 5/16/01 WILLIAM WHITE Accounts Payable Check 120.00 79244 5/16/01 TERRY ANN WILLINGHAM Accounts Payable Check 120.00 52301 5/23/01 DELHOMME INDUSTRIES,INC Accounts Payable Check 13,570.00 79245 5/25/01 ATASCADERO FED.CREDIT UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 5,705.00 79246 5/25/01 ATASCADERO FIRE DEPT EMP.ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 210.00 79247 5/25/01 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 40.00 79248 5/25/01 ASSOCIATION ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS Payroll Vendor Payment 365.50 79249 5/25/01 COUNTY-CITY EMPLOYEES CU Payroll Vendor Payment 895.00 79250 5/25/01 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 7,718.84 0 79251 5/25/01 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 648.15 79252 5/25/01 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 261.69 79253 5/25/01 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 6,268.69 79254 5/25/01 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Payroll Vendor Payment 500.00 79255 5/25/01 KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS Payroll Vendor Payment 47.00 79256 5/25/01 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM Payroll Vendor Payment 19.85 79257 5/25/01 PUBLIC EMPL RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 18 766.47 79258 5/25/01 SEIU LOCAL 620 AFL-CIO Payroll Vendor Payment 422.00 79259 5/25/01 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 444.00 79260 5/25/01 UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY Payroll Vendor Payment 48.00 79261 5/25/01 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 788.57 79262 5/25/01 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 432.00 53001 5/30/01 U.S.BANK Accounts Payable Check 50,000.00 39932599 5/30/01 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 35,103.91 S 582,406.26 020 ITEM NUMBER: A—3 • ."' "'° `® i 7/24/2001 .e....,o DATE 1918 ' N 1979 Atascadero City Council Staff Report-Administrative Services Department JUNE 2001 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE & PAYROLL RECOMMENDATION Approve certified City accounts payable,payroll and payroll vendor checks for June 2001. DISCUSSION Attached for City Council review and approval are the following: Payroll Dated 6/07/01 Checks # 10098 - 10238 $ 157,356.29 • Dated 6/21/01 Checks # 10239 - 10376 178,852.27 Dated 6/26/01 Checks # 10377 - 10387 12,269.78 Accounts Payable Dated June 1-30, 2001 Checks # 79263 - 79855 & EFTs 1,358,010.11 TOTAL AMOUNT $ 1,706,488.45 FISCAL IMPACT Total expenditures for all funds is $ 1,706,488.45 CERTIFICATION The undersigned certifies that the attached demands have been released for payment and that funds are available for these demands. Rachelle Rickard,Admin'strative Services Director Approved by the City Council at a meeting held July 24, 2001. • Marcia M. Torgerson, City Clerk ATTACHMENT: June 2001 Eden Warrant Register in the amount of $ 1,358,010.11 021 City of Ataseadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2001 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description AmountAft 79263 6/4/01 AASHTO Accounts Payable Check 214.00 79264 6/4/01 ACTION FAX&PRINTER Accounts Payable Check 48.15 79265 6/4/01 ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS Accounts Payable Check 1,942.98 79266 6/4/01 AFSS Accounts Payable Check 20.00 79267 6/4/01 ALBERTSONS Accounts Payable Check 79.45 79268 6/4/01 ALL AMERICAN SEWER TOOLS Accounts Payable Check 542.48 79269 6/4/01 JOE ALLEN Accounts Payable Check 630.00 79270 6/4/01 ALLIANCE TOWING Accounts Payable Check 70.00 79271 6/4/01 AMERICAN WEST TIRE&AUTO INC Accounts Payable Check 173.09 79272 6/4/01 ANDERSON'S AUTO SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 184.12 79273 6/4/01 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 384.42 79274 6/4/01 ASI CAL POLY Accounts Payable Check 250.00 79275 6/4/01 ASLIN INDUSTRIES Accounts Payable Check 369.60 79276 6/4/01 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 26.76 79277 6/4/01 ATASCADERO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Accounts Payable Check 275.00 79278 6/4/01 ATASCADERO COMMUNITY Accounts Payable Check 600.00 79279 6/4/01 ATASCADERO FORD Accounts Payable Check 613 79280 6/4/01 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 1 79281 6/4/01 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 286.05 79282 6/4/01 BEE INTERNATIONAL Accounts Payable Check 136.75 79283 6/4/01 BOB KEULEN CONSTRUCTION Accounts Payable Check 2,700.10 79284 6/4/01 BOTACH TACTICAL.COM Accounts Payable Check 471.31 79285 6/4/01 BYHAM,CHRIS Accounts Payable Check 120.00 79286 6/4/01 CALIFORNIA PARKS&RECREATION Accounts Payable Check 415.00 79287 6/4/01 CENTRAL COAST SANITATION Accounts Payable Check 169.74 79288 6/4/01 CERTIFIED FOLDER DISPLAY SVC Accounts Payable Check 2,413.29 79289 6/4/01 CHEM CLEAN Accounts Payable Check _ 76.45 79290 6/4/01 BRADY CHERRY Accounts Payable Check 300.00 79291 6/4/01 CHEVRON Accounts Payable Check 2,676.30 79292 6/4/01 CHICAGO GRADE LANDFILL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 280.80 79293, 6/4/01 CJP PRODUCTIONS Accounts Payable Check 7,343.00 79294 6/4/01 KAREN CLANIN Accounts Payable Check 420.00 79295 6/4/01 CLEAN WATER OUTLET Accounts Payable Check 35.00 79296 6/4/01 COLLEGE INN CONFERENCE CENTER Accounts Payable Check 146.86 79297 6/4/01 COMPUTER NERDS Accounts Payable Check 2,9� 022 City of Ataseadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2001 Check Check 7umber Date Vendor Description Amount 79298 6/4/01 CONWAY DISTRIBUTORS Accounts Payable Check 159.04 79299 6/4/01 CIMON CORMIER Accounts Payable Check 389.00 79300 6/4/01 CREATIVE BUS SALES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 46 214.53 79301 6/4/01 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 97.00 79302 6/4/01 CSFA Accounts Payable Check 50.00 79303 6/4/01 CUESTA EQUIPMENT Accounts Payable Check 890.62 79304 6/4/01 DAN BIDDLE PEST CONTROL SERVIC Accounts Payable Check 95.00 79305 6/4/01 DARRYL'S LOCK AND SAFE Accounts Payable Check 8.42 79306 6/4/01 DARTEK COMPUTER SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 152.01 79307 6/4/01 DAVID M FLEISHMAN Accounts Payable Check 800.00 79308 6/4/01 DEBLAUW BUILDERS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 50.00 79309 6/4/01 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 762.90 79310 6/4/01 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Accounts Payable Check 903.61 79311 6/4/01 DGM ARCHITECT Accounts Payable Check 5,162.00 79312 6/4/01 EL CAMINO CAR WASH LLC Accounts Payable Check 49.95 79313 6/4/01 EMBLEM ENTERPRISES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 896.42 79314 6/4/01 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 439.15 79315 6/4/01 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 560.55 79316 6/4/01 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL Accounts Payable Check 1,462.40 79317 6/4/01 FISHER SCIENTIFIC Accounts Payable Check 391.12 79318 6/4/01 FIVE STAR CARTRIDGES Accounts Payable Check 102.40 79319 6/4/01 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 235.65 79320 6/4/01 FRAZEE PAINTS Accounts Payable Check 67.41 79321 6/4/01 FRESNO CITY COLLEGE Accounts Payable Check 1,956.00 79322 6/4/01 KAREN GARMAN Accounts Payable Check 701.75 79323 6/4/01 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 1,302.39 79324 6/4/01 GATEWAY COMPANIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 6,488.46 79325 6/4/01 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 682.65 79326 6/4/01 GENIE AIR CONDITIONING&HTG Accounts Payable Check 660.75 79327 6/4/01 GETAGOVJOB.COM Accounts Payable Check 85.00 79328 6/4/01 MIKE GIL Accounts Payable Check 120.00 79329 6/4/01 JAMES GREENAWAY Accounts Payable Check 32.08 79330 6/4/01 H.D.PETERSON Accounts Payable Check 231.26 79331 6/4/01 HAMON OVERHEAD DOOR CO Accounts Payable Check 106.29 • 79332 6/4/01 HANSON AGGREGATES MID-PACIFIC Accounts Payable Check 531.39 79333 6/4/01 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 322.65 T 023 City of Ataseadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2001 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amoun 79334 6/4/01 HOBBY SHOP Accounts Payable Check 54 . 79335 6/4/01 JERAD L.HUTCHINSON Accounts Payable Check 60.00 79336 6/4/01 INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION Accounts Payable Check 662.84 79337 6/4/01 INGLIS PET HOTEL Accounts Payable Check 209.02 79338 6/4/01 EVELYN INGRAM Accounts Payable Check 408.24 79339 6/4/01 INTERNATIONAL TRAINING RES,LTD Accounts Payable Check 400.00 79340 6/4/01 J.J.KELLER&ASSC.,INC. Accounts Payable Check 205.64 79341 6/4/01 JESPERSEN'S TIRE SERVICE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 280.37 79342 6/4/01 JIFFY LUBE#1932 PCJL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 196.30 79343 6/4/01 JOBS AVAILABLE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 147.20 79344 6/4/01 K-MART Accounts Payable Check 47..20 79345 6/4/01 STEVEN KAHN Accounts Payable Check 337.39 79346 6/4/01 KEN'S MOBIL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 1,202.44 79347 6/4/01 CHUCK KENDRICK Accounts Payable Check 102.00 79348 6/4/01 NICHOLAS KENNEDY Accounts Payable Check 42.00 79349 6/4/01 LAWSON PRODUCTS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 171.25 79350 6/4/01 LEADS SOFTWARE GROUP INC. Accounts Payable Check 348.00 79351 6/4/01 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO. INC Accounts Payable Check 98• 79352 6/4/01 LEWIS PARTNERS Accounts Payable Check 7,600.00 79353 6/4/01 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 93.52 79354 6/4/01 TERI LIPPER Accounts Payable Check 69.30 79355 6/4/01 RUDY LORTON Accounts Payable Check 212.00 79356 6/4/01 LYNDON'S AUTOMOTIVE Accounts Payable Check 333.10 79357 6/4/01 MAIN ST SMALL ANIMAL HOSPITAL Accounts Payable Check 23.00 79358 6/4/01 MARK SIMON SEWER MAINTENANCE Accounts Payable Check 17,727.00 79359 6/4/01 DAWN MAZZAGETTI Accounts Payable Check 42.56 79360 6/4/01 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 400.00 79361 6/4/01 MICHAEL D.MESSER Accounts Payable Check 5,000.00 79362 6/4/01 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW Accounts Payable Check 259.12 79363 6/4/01 MID-STATE BANK Accounts Payable Check 91.00 79364 6/4/01 MID-STATE CONCRETE PRODUCTS Accounts Payable Check 126.31 79365 6/4/01 MIDTOWN SPORTS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 247.51 79366 6/4/01 KEVIN MILLER Accounts Payable Check 85.00 79367 6/4/01 PAUL MILLER Accounts Payable Check 187.00 79368 6/4/01 WINDY MILNE Accounts Payable Check 30 024 City of Ataseadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2001 Check Check umber Date Vendor Description Amount 79369 6/4/01 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 78.98 79370 6/4/01 MOORE'S WESTERN NURSERY Accounts Payable Check 69.95 79371 6/4/01 MPI MICROFILM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 6.33 79372 6/4/01 MUFFLER MAN . Accounts Payable Check 25.00 79373 6/4/01 MUSIC FACTORY Accounts Payable Check 155.15 79374 6/4/01 NEWCO DISTRIBUTORS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 629.90 79375 6/4/01 NORTH COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL Accounts Payable Check 250.00 79376 6/4/01 TIM O'MEARA Accounts Payable Check 102.00 79377 6/4/01 OPTICAL WAVELENGTH LABS CORP Accounts Payable Check 2,135.00 79378 6/4/01 OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 238.77 79379 6/4/01 PACIFIC BELL Accounts Payable Check 1,380.43 79380 6/4/01 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 589.87 79381 6/4/01 PACIFIC HOME DO IT CENTER Accounts Payable Check 169.32 79382 6/4/01 PAPER WORKS Accounts Payable Check 1,092.76 79383 6/4/01 LORI PARCELLS Accounts Payable Check 300.00 79384 6/4/01 PARTNERSHIP FOR THE CHILDREN Accounts Payable Check 250.00 79385 6/4/01 PASO ROBLES ELECTRIC,INC. Accounts Payable Check 68.48 79386 6/4/01 PASO ROBLES WINNELSON CO. Accounts Payable Check 118.87 79387 6/4/01 PERRY'S ELECTRIC MOTORS&CTRL Accounts Payable Check 755.43 79388 6/4/01 PERRY'S PARCEL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 12.95 79389 6/4/01 FIRE DEPARTMENT PETTY CASH Accounts Payable Check 109.54 79390 6/4/01 FINANCE DEPARTMENT PETTY CASH Accounts Payable Check 474.67 79391 6/4/01 PIONEER EQUIPMENT CO. Accounts Payable Check 169.00 79392 6/4/01 POSTAL PRIVILEGE Accounts Payable Check 27.94 79393 6/4/01 PRODUCERS DAIRY FOODS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 27.80 79394 6/4/01 QUILL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 851.77 79395 6/4/01 R.H.F.INC. Accounts Payable Check 59.00 79396 6/4/01 RADIO SHACK Accounts Payable Check 133.72 79397 6/4/01 RANCHO DE PARAISO LLC Accounts Payable Check 865.00 79398 6/4/01 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 131.93 79399 6/4/01 REPUBLIC INVESTMENTS Accounts Payable Check 5,000.00 79400 6/4/01 RICK BUTLER BUSINESS MACHINES Accounts Payable Check 128.05 79401 6/4/01 ROADLINE PRODUCTS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 116.63 79402 6/4/01 CAROLE ROBINSON Accounts Payable Check 40.00 • 79403 6/4/01 STEVE ROBINSON DVM Accounts Payable Check 2,000.00 79404 6/4/01 STEVE ROMO Accounts Payable Check 60.00 025 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2001 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description AmounAlft 79405 6/4/01 ROTO-ROOTER Accounts Payable Check 18 79406 6/4/01 S.C.A.C.E.O. Accounts Payable Check 40.00 79407 6/4/01 SAFETY-KLEEN INC. Accounts Payable Check 430.00 79408 6/4/01 SAN LUIS OBISPO REGIONAL Accounts Payable Check 3,000.00 79409 6/4/01 SAN LUIS PAINTS Accounts Payable Check 27.81 79410 6/4/01 SANTA MARIA TIRE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 233.65 79411 6/4/01 ROBERT SCHECHTER,DVM Accounts Payable Check 200.00 79412 6/4/01 STEVE SCHNARS Accounts Payable Check 175.00 79413 6/4/01 GRACE PUCCI,SECRETARIAL SERVICES BY GRAC Accounts Payable Check 255.00 79414 6/4/01 SHANDON HIGH SCHOOL Accounts Payable Check 250.00 79415 6/4/01 SHOP TOSHIBA Accounts Payable Check 4,128.06 79416 6/4/01 JOHN SIEMENS Accounts Payable Check 923.30 79417 6/4/01 SIGN OUTLET Accounts Payable Check 1,214.50 79418 6/4/01 TOM SILVA Accounts Payable Check 102.00 79419 6/4/01 SIR SPEEDY Accounts Payable Check 457.75 79420 6/4/01 VOID Accounts Payable Check 0.00 79421 6/4/01 JILL SMETHERS Accounts Payable Check 121. 79422 6/4/01 SOUZA CONSTRUCTION INC. Accounts Payable Check 22,3 1jj 79423 6/4/01 STAPLES INC. Accounts Payable Check 835.53 79424 6/4/01 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1,140.00 79425 6/4/01 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIERS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 177.50 79426 6/4/01 SYLVESTER'S SECURITY ALARMS Accounts Payable Check 197.50 79427 6/4/01 TAYLOR RENTAL CENTER Accounts Payable Check 92.49 79428 6/4/01 TEMPLETON FEED&GRAIN Accounts Payable Check 40.00 79429 6/4/01 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS Accounts Payable Check 425.75 79430 6/4/01 TERRY&PAULSON ENTERPRISE INC Accounts Payable Check 42.00 79431 6/4/01 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR Accounts Payable Check 210.06 79432 6/4/01 TODD PIPE&SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 499.68 79433 6/4/01 TREADWAY GRAPHICS Accounts Payable Check 982.89 79434 6/4/01 KIM TREECE Accounts Payable Check 272.98 79435 6/4/01 TRIBUNE Accounts Payable Check 497.95 79436 6/4/01 TURF STAR,INC. Accounts Payable Check 54.62 79437 6/4/01 TWIN CITIES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL Accounts Payable Check 15.00 79438 6/4/01 UNION ASPHALT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 444.58 79439 6/4/01 UNISOURCE MAINT SUPPLY SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 170 0i6 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2001 Check Check flufm, ber Date Vendor Description Amount 9440 6/4/01 UNITED GREEN MARK,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,662.53 79441 6/4/01 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 500.00 79442 6/4/01 UNIVERSAL SPECIALTIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 114.55 79443 6/4/01 UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOUL Accounts Payable Check 725.00 79444 6/4/01 JIM VANDERBERG Accounts Payable Check 100.98 79445 6/4/01 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 271.96 79446 6/4/01 VETERINARY SERVICE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 5,375.50 79447 6/4/01 TINA VILLALON Accounts Payable Check 102.00 79448 6/4/01 VONS Accounts Payable Check 14.97 79449 6/4/01 W.W.GRAINGER,INC. Accounts Payable Check 485.22 79450 6/4/01 WAL-MART,INC. Accounts Payable Check 181.77 79451 6/4/01 MIKE WALSH Accounts Payable Check 120.00 79452 6/4/01 WAYCO-NORTH COUNTY FIRE PROT Accounts Payable Check 26.43 79453 6/4/01 PATIENCE WEST Accounts Payable Check 30.38 79454 6/4/01 WESTERN FARM SERVICE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,021.74 79455 6/4/01 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 22.96 79456 6/4/01 WILKINS CREATIVE PRINTING Accounts Payable Check 277.67 79457 6/4/01 JEFF WILSHUSEN Accounts Payable Check 10.70 79458 6/4/01 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 135.63 79459 6/8/01 ATASCADERO FED.CREDIT UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 5,480.00 79460 6/8/01 ATASCADERO FIRE DEPT EMP.ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 195.00 79461 6/8/01 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 40.00 79462 6/8/01 ASSOCIATION ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS Payroll Vendor Payment 354.75 79463 6/8/01 COUNTY-CITY EMPLOYEES CU Payroll Vendor Payment 895.00 79464 6/8/01 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 6,826.96 79465 6/8/01 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 638.00 79466 6/8/01 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 261.69 79467 6/8/01 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 5,691.00 79468 6/8/01 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Payroll Vendor Payment 500.00 79469 6/8/01 KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS Payroll Vendor Payment 47.00 79470 6/8/01 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM Payroll Vendor Payment 19.85 79471 6/8/01 PUBLIC EMPL RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 18 226.80 79472 6/8/01 SEIU LOCAL 620 AFL-CIO Payroll Vendor Payment 416.87 79473 6/8/01 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 444.00 • 79474 6/8/01 UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY Payroll Vendor Payment 47.00 027 City of Ataseadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2001 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description Amondift 79475 6/8/01 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 7 79476 6/8/01 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 432.00 79477 6/12/01 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE CO Payroll Vendor Payment 608.16 79478 6/12/01 COLONIAL LIFE&ACCIDENT INS. Payroll Vendor Payment 2,142.34 79479 6/12/01 CPIC LIFE Payroll Vendor Payment 1,344.95 79480 6/12/01 DELTA DENTAL,ATTN:ACCOUNTING Payroll Vendor Payment 6,560.40 79481 6/12/01 EQUITABLE LIFE Payroll Vendor Payment 348.88 79482 6/12/01 LIFEGUARD INC. Payroll Vendor Payment 33,422.60 .79483 6/12/01 TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL LIFE Accounts Payable Check 110.96 41239462 6/12/01 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 31 533.48 79484 6/14/01 A2Z COMPUTERS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 91.29 79485 6/14/01 ACCURATE MAILING SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 532.46 79486 6/14/01 ACTION TOWING Accounts Payable Check 35.00 79487 6/14/01 AIR RITE REFRIGERATION Accounts Payable Check 623.70 79488 6/14/01 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 2,413.83 79489 6/14/01 AMERICAN BRISTOL INDUSTRIES Accounts Payable Check 699.75 79490 6/14/01 ANDERSON'S AUTO SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 1-0 79491 6/14/01 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS Accounts Payable Check 204.75 79492 6/14/01 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 101.94 79493 6/14/01 AT&T Accounts Payable Check 28.11 79494 6/14/01 ATASCADERO FORD Accounts Payable Check 1,957.04 79495 6/14/01 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 6,815.40 79496 6/14/01 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASN Accounts Payable Check 145.46 79497 6/14/01 AVAYA INC. Accounts Payable Check 22.36 79498 6/14/01 TIFFANY AYLES Accounts Payable Check 61.44 79499 6/14/01 BAD SUSHI Accounts Payable Check 300.00 79500 6/14/01 ANN BANKS Accounts Payable Check 45.00 79501 6/14/01 BARKLOW'S FIRE TRUCK PARTS Accounts Payable Check 123.25 79502 6/14/01 BAY LAUREL GARDEN CENTER Accounts Payable Check 74.91 79503 6/14/01 CATHERINE BEACH Accounts Payable Check 35.00 79504 6/14/01 PAUL BEBEAU Accounts Payable Check 175.00 79505 6/14/01 CINDY K.BENSON Accounts Payable Check 448.70 79506 6/14/01 BIG DADDY BLUES BAND Accounts Payable Check 300.00 79507 6/14/01 VOID Accounts Payable Check 79508 6/14/01 BYHAM,CHRIS Accounts Payable Check 10 . 028 City of Ataseadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2001 Check Check umber Date Vendor Description Amount 79509 6/14/01 CAL-COAST REFRIGERATION,INC Accounts Payable Check 133.25 79510 6/14/01 CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT LAW LETR Accounts Payable Check 277.00 79511 6/14/01 CALIFORNIA INTERNET CONNECTION Accounts Payable Check 969.75 79512 6/14/01 CALIFORNIA PEACE OFFICERS ASSN Accounts Payable Check 85.00 79513 6/14/01 CARROT-TOP INDUSTRIES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 117.00 79514 6/14/01 CASCADE FIRE EQUIPMENT CO Accounts Payable Check 571.19 79515 6/14/01 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CED Accounts Payable Check 174.95 79516 6/14/01 CELLULARONE Accounts Payable Check 510.85 79517 6/14/01 CENTRAL COAST SANITATION Accounts Payable Check 62.58 79518 6/14/01 CHARLES SCOTT CHAPMAN Accounts Payable Check 168.00 79519 6/14/01 CHEM CLEAN Accounts Payable Check 1,290.42 79520 6/14/01 CHEVRON Accounts Payable Check 776.60 79521 6/14/01 CITY NATIONAL BANK Accounts Payable Check 127,481.25 79522 6/14/01 CJP PRODUCTIONS Accounts Payable Check 844.87 79523 6/14/01 CLEAN WATER OUTLET Accounts Payable Check 35.00 79524 6/14/01 COMPAC COMPUTER CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 2,730.65 79525 6/14/01 CIMON CORMIER Accounts Payable Check 227.00 • 79526 6/14/01 JOHN COUCH Accounts Payable Check 11.72 79527 6/14/01 COUNTRY COPY Accounts Payable Check 42.80 79528 6/14/01 CRAWFORD MULTARI CLARK&MOHR Accounts Payable Check 18,250.48 79529 6/14/01 CREDIT BUREAU Accounts Payable Check 16.00 79530 6/14/01 CUESTA COLLEGE Accounts Payable Check 161.54 79531 6/14/01 DARRYL'S LOCK AND SAFE Accounts Payable Check 21.40 79532 6/14/01 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 100.12 79533 .6/14/01 BOB DIGNAN Accounts Payable Check 40.00 79534 6/14/01 AILEEN EDGE Accounts Payable Check 15.00 79535 6/14/01 ELLIOTT'S PHARMACY DBA MAXCARE Accounts Payable Check 500.00 79536 6/14/01 ESCUELA DEL RIO Accounts Payable Check 46.80 79537 6/14/01 FARWEST LINE SPECIALTIES Accounts Payable Check 70.30 79538 6/14/01 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 202.95 79539 6/14/01 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 73.50 79540 6/14/01 FOX&SOHAGI,LLP Accounts Payable Check 1,695.02 79541 6/14/01 FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 120.53 79542 6/14/01 MELANNIE FRANTZ Accounts Payable Check 92.82 is 79543 6/14/01 KAREN GARMAN Accounts Payable Check 634.90 79544 6/14/01 MIKE GIL Accounts Payable Check 90.00 0?9 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2001 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description AmourAft 79545 6/14/01 KENNETH GLYNN Accounts Payable Check 22W 79546 6/14/01 DIANA GOLLEDGE Accounts Payable Check 2,500.00 79549 6/14/01 GST CALL AMERICA Accounts Payable Check 811.72 79550 6/14/01 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 952.21 79551 6/14/01 HINDERLITER,DE LLAMAS Accounts Payable Check 1,082.09 79552 6/14/01 HOLIDAY INN-TORRANCE Accounts Payable Check 535.80 79553 6/14/01 JERAD L.HUTCHINSON Accounts Payable Check 45.00 79554 6/14/01 INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION Accounts Payable Check 524.24 79555 6/14/01 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE INSTI Accounts Payable Check 60.00 79556 6/14/01 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM Accounts Payable Check 72.71 79557 6/14/01 J.CHRISTOPHER TOEWS Accounts Payable Check 1,853.58 79558 6/14/01 EDWARD P.JARDINI Accounts Payable Check 490.00 79559 6/14/01 JENCKS LAW GROUP Accounts Payable Check 1,162.52 79560 6/14/01 JIFFY LUBE#1932 PCJL,INC. Accounts Payable Check 84.16 79561 6/14/01 K-MART Accounts Payable Check 55.39 79562 6/14/01 KEN'S MOBIL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 1,137.04 79563 6/14/01 CHUCK KENDRICK Accounts Payable Check 102. 0 79564 6/14/01 L.N.CURTIS&SONS Accounts Payable Check 5,1 , 79565 6/14/01 LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 18,495.65 79566 6/14/01 LEADS SOFTWARE GROUP INC. Accounts Payable Check 348.00 79567 6/14/01 LEMOS FEED&PET SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 18.22 79568 6/14/01 ROBERT LIBRIZZI Accounts Payable Check 125.00 79569 6/14/01 SUSAN LITTERAL Accounts Payable Check 22.20 79570 6/14/01 LONGS DRUG STORES Accounts Payable Check 8.01 79571 6/14/01 RUDY LORTON Accounts Payable Check 84.00 79572 6/14/01 LYNDON'S AUTOMOTIVE Accounts Payable Check 433.34 79573 6/14/01 JOHN MARTINO Accounts Payable Check 75.00 79574 6/14/01 MEDSTOP URGENT CARE Accounts Payable Check 2,915.00 79575 6/14/01 MICHAEL FREDERICK PAVING,INC. Accounts Payable Check 1,780.00 79576 6/14/01 KEVIN MILLER Accounts Payable Check 51.00 79577 6/14/01 PAUL MILLER Accounts Payable Check 85.00 79578 6/14/01 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 157.02 79579 6/14/01 MODERN CONTROLS CORP DBA Accounts Payable Check 65.00 79580 6/14/01 MYERS-STEVENS AND CO.,INC. Accounts Payable Check 108.50 79581 6/14/01 TIM O'MEARA Accounts Payable Check 030 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2001 Check Check Neumber Date Vendor Description Amount w 79595 6/14/01 PACIFIC BELL Accounts Payable Check 5,355.48 79597 6/14/01 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 18,820.17 79598 6/14/01 PACIFIC HOME DO IT CENTER Accounts Payable Check 9.29 79599 6/14/01 PADGETT THOMPSON Accounts Payable Check 262.19 79600 6/14/01 PAPER WORKS Accounts Payable Check 110.94 79601 6/14/01 PENNY MEN Accounts Payable Check 22.92 79602 6/14/01 PERRY'S PARCEL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 80.15 79603 6/14/01 PETE JOHNSTON CHEVROLET Accounts Payable Check 2,195.78 79604 6/14/01 TERRY PETERSON Accounts Payable Check 34.00 79605 6/14/01 FIRE DEPARTMENT PETTY CASH Accounts Payable Check 147.02 79606 6/14/01 PETTY CASH-AQUATICS Accounts Payable Check 100.00 79607 6/14/01 POOR RICHARD'S PRESS Accounts Payable Check 164.78 79608 6/14/01 PRO MOTION Accounts Payable Check 411.00 79609 6/14/01 QUILL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 619.00 79610 6/14/01 RADIO SHACK Accounts Payable Check 42.77 79611 6/14/01 RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF SLO Accounts Payable Check 41.00 79612 6/14/01 RAINBOW MEALWORMS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 28.28 • 79613 6/14/01 NANCY RICE Accounts Payable Check 281.00 79614 6/14/01 RACHELLE RICKARD Accounts Payable Check 49.83 79615 6/14/01 ROBERT F.DRIVER COMPANY,INC. Accounts Payable Check 195.00 79616. .6/14/01 STEVE ROMO Accounts Payable Check 135.00 79617 6/14/01 SANTA MARIA TIRE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 996.24 79618 6/14/01 STEVE SCHNARS Accounts Payable Check 11.72 79619 6/14/01 LISETTE SCHOLL Accounts Payable Check 164.50 79620 6/14/01 SEARS Accounts Payable Check 503.92 79621 6/14/01 GRACE PUCCI,SECRETARIAL SERVICES BY GRAC Accounts Payable Check 472.50 79622 6/14/01 JOHN SIEMENS Accounts Payable Check 21.40 79623 6/14/01 SIGN OUTLET Accounts Payable Check 1,272.31 79624 6/14/01 TOM SILVA Accounts Payable Check 102.00 79625 6/14/01 SO.CALIF.MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC Accounts Payable Check 62.00 79626 6/14/01 SAFETY EQUIPMENT SOLON FIRE CONTROL FIRE Accounts Payable Check 261.61 79627 6/14/01 SUNLIGHT JANITORIAL Accounts Payable Check 1,125.00 79628 6/14/01 T-N-T PEST CONTROL Accounts Payable Check 88.00 79629 6/14/01 TEDAS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 9,933.50 • 79630 6/14/01 TERRY&PAULSON ENTERPRISE INC Accounts Payable Check 213.74 79631 6/14/01 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR Accounts Payable Check 198.00 031 City of Ataseadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2001 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description AmoutAft 79632 6/14/01 UNION ASPHALT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 27 . 79633 6/14/01 UNISOURCE MAINT SUPPLY SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 182.20 79634 6/14/01 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 250.21 79635 6/14/01 TINA VILLALON Accounts Payable Check 119.00 79636 6/14/01 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 97.35 79637 6/14/01 WILKINS CREATIVE PRINTING Accounts Payable Check 1,026.13 79638 6/14/01 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 9,991.68 79639 6/14/01 CCO INTERNET SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 532.00 79640 6/14/01 GENIE'S STEAK HOUSE Accounts Payable Check 500.00' 79641 6/14/01 ROUND TABLE PIZZA Accounts Payable Check 400.00 79642 6/14/01 SEA VENTURE RESORT Accounts Payable Check 3,000.00 79643 6/22/01 ATASCADERO FED.CREDIT UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 5,480.00 79644 6/22/01 ATASCADERO FIRE DEPT EMP.ASSN Payroll Vendor Payment 195.00 79645 6/22/01 ATASCADERO MID MGRS ORG UNION Payroll Vendor Payment 40.00 79646 6/22/01 ATASCADERO POLICE OFFICERS ASN Payroll Vendor Payment 354.75 79647 6/22/01 COUNTY-CITY EMPLOYEES CU Payroll Vendor Payment 895.00 79648 6/22/01 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 10,2 79649 6/22/01 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 77 79650 6/22/01 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 261.69 79651 6/22/01 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE Payroll Vendor Payment 5,691.00 79652 6/22/01 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 Payroll Vendor Payment 500.00 79653 6/22/01 KENNEDY CLUB FITNESS Payroll Vendor Payment 47.00 79654 6/22/01 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM Payroll Vendor Payment 19.85 79655 6/22/01 PUBLIC EMPL RETIREMENT SYSTEM Payroll Vendor Payment 18,661.08 79656 6/22/01 SEIU LOCAL 620 AFL-CIO Payroll Vendor Payment 405.69 79657 6/22/01 FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION Payroll Vendor Payment 444.00 79658 6/22/01 UNITED WAY OF SLO COUNTY Payroll Vendor Payment 47.00 79659 6/22/01 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 688.68 79660 6/22/01 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 432.00 79661 6/25/01 BLUEPRINTER Accounts Payable Check 87.74 79662 6/25/01 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 36.67 79663 6/25/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 4101 Accounts Payable Check 187.78 79664 6/25/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 4119 Accounts Payable Check 979.02 79665 6/25/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 4135 Accounts Payable Check 1,13 79666 6/25/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 4143 Accounts Payable Check 62� 032 City of Ataseadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2001 Check Check umber Date Vendor Description Amount 79667 6/25/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 4150 Accounts Payable Check 1,077.14 79668 6/25/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 4168 Accounts Payable Check 18.02 79669 6/25/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 6082 Accounts Payable Check 229.03 79670 6/25/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 6090 Accounts Payable Check 252.64 79671 6/25/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 6108 Accounts Payable Check 388.16 79672 6/25/01 MASTERCARD DEPARTMENT 9902 Accounts Payable Check 50.36 42564488 6/26/01 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 43 424.40 79673 6/27/01 EMPLOYMENT DEV DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 1,384.57 79674 6/27/01 EMPLOYMENT DEV.DEPARTMENT Payroll Vendor Payment 12.44 43035807 6/28/01 MID-STATE BANK Payroll Vendor Payment 4,844.50 79675 6/29/01 ADVANCED PAGING Accounts Payable Check 32.23 79676 6/29/01 AIR RITE REFRIGERATION Accounts Payable Check 1,070.89 79677 6/29/01 ALBERTSONS Accounts Payable Check 106.89 79678 6/29/01 JOE ALLEN Accounts Payable Check 105.00 79679 6/29/01 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 10,153.23 • 79680 6/29/01 MIKE ALOI Accounts Payable Check 125.00 79681 6/29/01 ANDERSON'S AUTO SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 110.70 79682 6/29/01 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 525.24 79683 6/29/01 ARCH Accounts Payable Check 99.40 79684 6/29/01 ATASCADERO BATTERY EXCHANGE Accounts Payable Check 42.80 79685 6/29/01 ATASCADERO FORD Accounts Payable Check 1,403.64 79686 6/29/01 ATASCADERO MUTUAL WATER CO. Accounts Payable Check 8.00 79687 6/29/01 ATASCADERO NEWS Accounts Payable Check 1,067.45 79688 6/29/01 BATTERY ZONE WEST Accounts Payable Check 78.35 79689 6/29/01 CATHERINE BEACH Accounts Payable Check 45.19 79690 6/29/01 PAUL BEBEAU Accounts Payable Check 21.70 79691 6/29/01 BEST BEST&KRIEGER LLP Accounts Payable Check 466.00 79692 6/29/01 BEST WESTERN LIGHTHOUSE HOTEL Accounts Payable Check 670.00 79693 6/29/01 JOHN BLAIR Accounts Payable Check 120.00 79694 6/29/01 BOW VALLEY Accounts Payable Check 9,531.48 79695 6/29/01 BRENDLER JANITORIAL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 600.00 79696 6/29/01 BYHAM,CHRIS Accounts Payable Check 40.00 is 79697 6/29/01 CAL TRANS Accounts Payable Check 800.00 79698 6/29/01 CCO INTERNET SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 780.00 033 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2001 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description AmnimAdIft 79699 6/29/01 CDW GOVERNMENT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 93 . 79700 6/29/01 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CED Accounts Payable Check 148.99 79701 6/29/01 CELERA Accounts Payable Check 20.00 79702 6/29/01 CENTRAL COAST LOCK&KEY Accounts Payable Check 1,034.50 79703 6/29/01 CENTRAL COAST SANITATION Accounts Payable Check 56.58 79704 6/29/01, CHALK MOUNTAIN GOLF COURSE Accounts Payable Check 750.00 79705 6/29/01 CHEM CLEAN Accounts Payable Check 389.91 79706 6/29/01 CHEVRON Accounts Payable Check 3,884.33 79707 6/29/01 CHEVRON Accounts Payable Check 776.27 79708 6/29/01 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST Accounts Payable Check 250.00 79709 6/29/01 CJP PRODUCTIONS Accounts Payable Check 6,900.00 79710 6/29/01 CONWAY DISTRIBUTORS Accounts Payable Check 111.00 79711 6/29/01 CIMON CORMIER Accounts Payable Check 51.00 79712 6/29/01 CRM LEARNING Accounts Payable Check 53.24 79713 6/29/01 CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER Accounts Payable Check 103.88 79714 6/29/01 CUESTA EQUIPMENT Accounts Payable Check 18.83 79715 6/29/01 BRIAN DANA Accounts Payable Check 214.50 79716 6/29/01 DARRYUS LOCK AND SAFE Accounts Payable Check • 79717 6/29/01 DECOU LUMBER COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 600.32 79718 6/29/01 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Accounts Payable Check 1,321.11 79719 6/29/01 DGM ARCHITECT Accounts Payable Check 7,570.99 79720 6/29/01 JOE DOMINGUEZ Accounts Payable Check 120.00 79721 6/29/01 DONALD JACOBS DISTRIBUTING Accounts Payable Check 2,608.12 79722 6/29/01 EXXON MOBIL Accounts Payable Check 284.88 79723 6/29/01 FARM SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 87.47 79724 6/29/01 FARWEST LINE SPECIALTIES Accounts Payable Check 245.03 79725 6/29/01 FEDERAL EXPRESS Accounts Payable Check 56.84 79726 6/29/01 FERRELL'S AUTO REPAIR Accounts Payable Check 252.00 79727 6/29/01 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL Accounts Payable Check 212.00 79728 6/29/01 FIRE MAINTENANCE COMPANY,LLC Accounts Payable Check 284.00 79729 6/29/01 FISHER SCIENTIFIC Accounts Payable Check 71.27 79730 6/29/01 FOOD FOR LESS Accounts Payable Check 271.94 79731 6/29/01 FRAZEE PAINTS Accounts Payable Check 205.11 79732 6/29/01 MELISSA FROEHNER Accounts Payable Check 25.00 79733 6/29/01 GAS COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 600 034 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2001 Check Check AMWum Date Vendor Description Amount 79734 6/29/01 GEM AUTO PARTS Accounts Payable Check 808.96 79735 6/29/01 GENERAL HOSPITAL Accounts Payable Check 217.00 79736 6/29/01 GENIE AIR CONDITIONING&HTG Accounts Payable Check 660.75 79737 6/29/01 GIBBS INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS Accounts Payable Check 1,077.89 79738 6/29/01 GREATSCOPES Accounts Payable Check 849.53 79739 6/29/01 MARK GREENAWAY Accounts Payable Check 760.00 79740 6/29/01 GRISANTI HARDWARE Accounts Payable Check 3.81 79741 6/29/01 H.D.PETERSON Accounts Payable Check 67.79 79742 6/29/01 HAMON OVERHEAD DOOR CO Accounts Payable Check 179.60 79743 6/29/01 VICTOR HARRIS Accounts Payable Check 60.00 79744 6/29/01 HART IMPRESSIONS PRINT© Accounts Payable Check 63.38 79745 6/29/01 HAWTHORNE SUITES HOTEL Accounts Payable Check 297.00 79746 6/29/01 MARIA HERNANDEZ Accounts Payable Check 250.00 79747 6/29/01 REGIONALD HICKS Accounts Payable Check 125.00 79748 6/29/01 HOBBY SHOP Accounts Payable Check 1,122.16 79749 6/29/01 CHERYL HOSIER Accounts Payable Check 13.24 79750 6/29/01 HYATT REGENCY SACRAMENTO Accounts Payable Check 593.92 • 79751 6/29/01 INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION Accounts Payable Check 506.50 79752 6/29/01 J.J.KELLER&ASSC.,INC. Accounts Payable Check 193.84 79753 6/29/01 EDWARD P.JARDINI Accounts Payable Check 125.00 79754 6/29/01 JESPERSEN'S TIRE SERVICE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 59.95 79755 6/29/01 K-MART Accounts Payable Check 50.27 79756 6/29/01 JOY KING Accounts Payable Check 250.00 79757 6/29/01 LEE WILSON ELECTRIC CO.INC Accounts Payable Check 980.00 79758 6/29/01 LIGHTHOUSE LODGE&SUITES Accounts Payable Check 272.00 79759 6/29/01 ED LIMON Accounts Payable Check 120.00 79760 6/29/01 KELLI LOMBARDI Accounts Payable Check 828.52 79761 6/29/01 RUDY LORTON Accounts Payable Check 128.00 79762 6/29/01 MARK LUNDBERG Accounts Payable Check 300.00 79763 6/29/01 LYNDON'S AUTOMOTIVE Accounts Payable Check 97.50 79764 6/29/01 LYNN CARD COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 47.00 79765 6/29/01 MARCH EQUIPMENT CO. Accounts Payable Check 2,294.04 79766 6/29/01 MARK'S PLUMBING&WATER TRMNT Accounts Payable Check 50.50 79767 6/29/01 ROBERT MAXWELL Accounts Payable Check 261.63 • 79768 6/29/01 MARY MCCULLOCH Accounts Payable Check 27.93 79769 6/29/01 MCKINLEY EQUIPMENT CORP. Accounts Payable Check 116.01 035 City of Ataseadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2001 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description AmniinAlft 79770 6/29/01 WADE MCKINNEY Accounts Payable Check 19 . 79771 6/29/01 MID-COAST MOWER&SAW Accounts Payable Check 975.91 79772 6/29/01 MIKE HOWE'S AUTOMOTIVE Accounts Payable Check 37.20 79773 6/29/01 PAUL MILLER Accounts Payable Check 85.00 79774 6/29/01 KEVIN MILLER Accounts Payable Check 102.00 79775 6/29/01 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 122.47 79776 6/29/01 MUSIC FACTORY Accounts Payable Check 3,251.64 79777 6/29/01 NAVAJO ROCK&BLOCK Accounts Payable Check 469.65 79778 6/29/01 NICKSON'S MACHINE SHOP INC. Accounts Payable Check 2,241.39 79779 6/29/01 NORMILE CONCEPTS Accounts Payable Check 25.00 79780 6/29/01 NORTH COUNTY GLASS Accounts Payable Check 810.41 79781 6/29/01 TIM O'MEARA Accounts Payable Check 153.00 79782 6/29/01 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN Accounts Payable Check 53.08 79783 6/29/01 OTTO ENGINEERING Accounts Payable Check 1,308.36 79784 6/29/01 OUTLET TOOL SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 64.18 79785 6/29/01 PACIFIC BELL Accounts Payable Check 958.86 79786 6/29/01 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC Accounts Payable Check 681 79787 6/29/01 PACIFIC HOME DO IT CENTER Accounts Payable Check 26j6 79788 6/29/01 PAM PALADINI Accounts Payable Check 250.00 79789 6/29/01 PAPER WORKS Accounts Payable Check 168.11 79790 6/29/01 LORI PARCELLS Accounts Payable Check 3,000.00 79791 6/29/01 PASO ROBLES ELECTRIC,INC. Accounts Payable Check 97.87 79792 6/29/01 PASO ROBLES TRUCK CENTER Accounts Payable Check 581.66 79793 6/29/01 BARBARA PATTON Accounts Payable Check 77.22 79794 6/29/01 DAVE PAYTON Accounts Payable Check 50.50 79795 6/29/01 PETE JOHNSTON CHEVROLET Accounts Payable Check 30.60 79796 6/29/01 PETTY CASH-RECREATION Accounts Payable Check 50.00 79797 6/29/01 PITNEY BOWES,INC. Accounts Payable Check 51.72 79798 6/29/01 POOR RICHARD'S PRESS Accounts Payable Check 733.56 79799 6/29/01 POSTAL PRIVILEGE Accounts Payable Check 82.50 79800 6/29/01 PRO MOTION Accounts Payable Check 1,236.59 79801 6/29/01 GREG BAXTER PRO-CLEAN Accounts Payable Check 150.00 79802 6/29/01 PRODUCERS DAIRY FOODS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 20.80 79803 6/29/01 PROJECTOR PEOPLE Accounts Payable Check 8,065.00 79804 6/29/01 QUILL CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 10 036 City of Atascadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2001 Check Check rum�ber Date Vendor Description Amount 79805 6/29/01 R&R CUSTOM TRUCK BODIES&EQ Accounts Payable Check 2,148.38 79806 6/29/01 R.BURKE CORPORATION Accounts Payable Check 450 018.71 79807 6/29/01 RADIO SHACK Accounts Payable Check 13.68 79808 6/29/01 RAINBOW MEALWORMS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 27.21 79809 6/29/01 RECOGNITION WORKS Accounts Payable Check 839.84 79810 6/29/01 RACHELLE RICKARD Accounts Payable Check 394.76 79811 6/29/01 JOHN RODGERS Accounts Payable Check 105.00 79812 6/29/01 RTC R THOMPSON CONSULTING Accounts Payable Check 411.00 79813 6/29/01 S.B.R.P.S.T.C. Accounts Payable Check 466.00 79814 6/29/01 SAFETY STRIPING SERVICE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 25 467.95 79815 6/29/01 SAN JOAQUIN SUPPLY COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 118.96 79816 6/29/01 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SHERIFF Accounts Payable Check 15 125.00 79817 6/29/01 SAN LUIS PAINTS Accounts Payable Check 252.25 79818 6/29/01 SANTA MARIA TIRE,INC. Accounts Payable Check 301.84 79819 6/29/01 GERALDINE SAWYER Accounts Payable Check 250.00 79820 6/29/01 MICHELE SCHAMBER Accounts Payable Check 105.00 79821 6/29/01 GRACE PUCCI,SECRETARIAL SERVICES BY GRAC Accounts Payable Check 427.50 • 79822 6/29/01 SENATOR FORD,INC. Accounts Payable Check 39,162.00 79823 6/29/01 TOM SILVA Accounts Payable Check 102.00 79824 6/29/01 SILVERADO STAGES INC. Accounts Payable Check 895.00 79825 6/29/01 SIR SPEEDY Accounts Payable Check 154.70 79826 6/29/01 STERLING COMMUNICATIONS Accounts Payable Check 2,659.57 79827 6/29/01 STEWART'S WHEEL SHOP Accounts Payable Check 50.00 79828 6/29/01 ROY STRONG Accounts Payable Check 96.27 79829 6/29/01 SUN BADGE COMPANY Accounts Payable Check 327.61 79830 6/29/01 SUNSET BOOKS Accounts Payable Check 13.69 79831 6/29/01 SUPERIOR QUALITY COPIERS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 247.04 79832 6/29/01 SYLVESTER'S SECURITY ALARMS Accounts Payable Check 197.50 79833 6/29/01 JERRY TAMELIER Accounts Payable Check 756.56 79834 6/29/01 TARGET Accounts Payable Check 1,151.30 79835 6/29/01 TEDAS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 2,407.50 79836 6/29/01 TEMPLETON FEED&GRAIN Accounts Payable Check 97.52 79837 6/29/01 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR Accounts Payable Check 1,746.55 79838 6/29/01 TODD PIPE&SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 68.85 4079839 6/29/01 TOMARK SPORTS,INC. Accounts Payable Check 334.08 79840 6/29/01 MARCIA TORGERSON Accounts Payable Check 21.00 037 City of Ataseadero Disbursement Listing For the Month of June 2001 Check Check Number Date Vendor Description niiniift 79841 6/29/01 TRIBUNE Accounts Payable Check 1 418. 79842 6/29/01 TURF STAR,INC. Accounts Payable Check 335.90 79843 6/29/01 UNION ASPHALT,INC. Accounts Payable Check 363.64 79844 6/29/01 UNISOURCE MAINT SUPPLY SYSTEMS Accounts Payable Check 137.60 79845 6/29/01 UNITED GREEN MARK,INC. Accounts Payable Check 855.60 79846 6/29/01 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE Accounts Payable Check 16.44 79847 6/29/01 VERIZON WIRELESS Accounts Payable Check 329.90 79848 6/29/01 BECKY VESNAVER Accounts Payable Check 85.00 79849 6/29/01 VOSE SERVICES Accounts Payable Check 295.00 79850 6/29/01 W.W.GRAINGER,INC. Accounts Payable Check 27.45 79851 6/29/01 WESTERN FENCE Accounts Payable Check 3,720.00 79852 6/29/01 WESTERN JANITOR SUPPLY Accounts Payable Check 214.00 79853 6/29/01 WHELEN ENGINEERING CO.,INC Accounts Payable Check 14.26 79854 6/29/01 CHUCK WILBUR Accounts Payable Check 250.00 79855 6/29/01 JEFF WILSHUSEN Accounts Payable Check 214.50 $ 1,358,010.11 • • 038 ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 07/24/2001 ;■ sig ■ ■ iaia ® to e City Manager's Agenda Report Wade G. McKinney 2001-2002 Annual Spending Limit RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt the draft Resolution establishing the annual spending limit for fiscal year 2001- 2002. DISCUSSION: As part of the City's annual budget adoption process, the City's annual spending limit (Gann Limit) must be approved by the Council. Staff calculates the new limit based on the formula set forth in Proposition I I I- The limit was calculated as follows: A. Prior Year Spending Limit $9,761,093 B. Population Factor 1.0160 C. Inflation Factor 1.0782 D. Adjustment Factor(B*C) 1.095451 E. Total Adjustment(A*(D-1)) $931,708 F. Current Year Limit (A+E) 1o,692,801 FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolution 039 ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 07/24/2001 DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 ANNUAL SPENDING LIMIT WHEREAS, Proposition 111 revises the methodology used to calculate the Annual Spending Limit; and WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero must select the most appropriate criteria to be used in calculating the annual limit; and THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Atascadero. Section 1. That the City of Atascadero elects to use the following criteria for fiscal year 2001-2002 in establishing its new Annual Spending Limit: County Population and California Per Capita Income Section 2. That the annual spending limit for 2001-2002 is calculated as follows: Fiscal Year Percentage Change New Limit 2001-2002 9.54% $10,692,801 SECTION 3. Any judicial action or challenge must be commenced within 45 days of the effective date of this resolution. SECTION 4. Documentation used in determining the Annual Spending Limit is available to the public in the Finance Department, Administration Building, 6500 Palma Avenue, Room 203, Atascadero, California. On motion by Council Member , And seconded by Council Member , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk J. Michael Arrambide, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney _ 040 ITEM NUMBER: A—5 DATE: 07/24/2001 • "r oil Ass � 1 1979 CA] Atascadero City Council Staff Report- Community Development Department Rancho De Paraiso Zone Change 2001-0013 (San Gabriel Road / Portal Road / Escondido Road Area City of Atascadero) SUBJECT: The proposed project consists of a City-initiated zone change application to change the zoning of the proposed Rancho De Paraiso Tract Map area from the Agriculture (A) zoning district to the Residential Suburban (RS) zoning district. RECOMMENDATION: City Council introduce the draft Ordinance, for second reading by title only, and adopt the draft Ordinance, enacting Zone Change 2001-0013 changing the zoning district within the Rancho De Paraiso Tract Map area from the Agriculture zoning district to the Residential Suburban zoning district. DISCUSSION: On June 26, 2001, the City Council conducted a public hearing to consider amendment of the Official Zoning Map of the City of Atascadero from Agriculture (A) to Residential Suburban (RS). The zone change will amend the Official Zoning Map to correctly reflect the General Plan Land Use Map. There were no changes made by the City Council to the Ordinance during its first reading and it is ready for final adoption as attached. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance 041 ITEM NUMBER: A-5 DATE: 07/24/2001 DRAFT ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 2001-0013 THEREBY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP DISTRICT OF APN 054-192-004, 054-192-005, 054-191-025, 054- 192-017, 054-192-018, 054-191-026, 054-191-027, 054-191-020, 054-191-021 FROM "A " (AGRICULTURE) TO "RS" (RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN) (City of Atascadero) WHEREAS, an application has been initiated by the City of Atascadero (6500 Palma Avenue), Applicant, to consider a project consisting of a zone change from A (Agriculture) to RS (Residential Suburban) on APN 054-192-004, 054-192-005, 054- 191-025, 054-192-017, 054-192-018, 054-191-026, 054-191-027, 054-191-020, and 054- 191-021; and, WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is SSF (Suburban Single Family), which is consistent with the RS (Residential Suburban) zoning district; and, WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is "A" (Agriculture); and, WHEREAS, Section E.2 (Implementation) of the City's General Plan states that highest priority shall be given to initiating comprehensive amendments to the zoning map so that the zoning map is consistent with the Land Use Diagram; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enact this amendment to the Zoning Map to protect the health, safety and welfare of its citizens by applying orderly development of the City; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on April 17, 2001, studied and considered Zone Change 2001-0013, after first studying and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project, recommended the project for approval to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed public hearing upon the subject Zone Change application was held by the City Council of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said zone change; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed public hearing held on June 26, 2001, approved Zone Change 2001-0013, after first studying 042 ITEM NUMBER: A-5 DATE: 07/24/2001 and considering the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project and the Planning Commission's recommendation; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, held a second reading of the Draft Ordinance on July 24, 2001. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council does ordain as follows: Section 1. Findings for approval of zoning map change. 1. The Zone Change is consistent with General Plan policies and all other applicable ordinances and policies of the City. 2. The Zone Change will not, in itself, result in significant environmental impacts. The Negative Declaration prepared for the Zone Change and for the project has been certified as adequate, in accordance with California environmental laws. Section 2. Zone Map Change. 1. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Atascadero on file in the Community Development Department is hereby amended as shown on the attached Exhibit A, which is made part of this ordinance by reference. On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: J. Michael Arrambide, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney 043 ITEM NUMBER: A-5 DATE: 07/24/2001 EXHIBIT A: Draft Ordinance Proposed Zoning Change General Plan Land Use Map: SSF Suburban Single Family a: �µ arm% Esco aido erw8 Zoning Map: Existing Zoning: "A"Agriculture Proposed Zoning: 1/RS"Residential Suburban Es di a erwe 044 ITEM NUMBER: A-6 DATE: 0724/2001 1979 Atascadero City Council Staff Report — Community Services Department Youth/ Community Center State Grant Funds RECOMMENDATION: Council approve the Draft Resolution authorizing the City Manager to apply for Grant Funds from the State of California for the Atascadero Youth/Community Center. • DISCUSSION: The State of California Department of Parks and Recreation administers the member request funds allocated for the Atascadero Youth Community Center. The City of Atascadero has been allocated $492,000 through a Member Request Grant from State Senator Jack O'Connell. The Procedural Guide prepared by the State of California Department of Parks and Recreation requires that the governing body of the recipient agency, certify by resolution the authorization of the Grantee to apply for the State funds. The State of California Department of Parks and Recreation, following the submission of this resolution, will draft and forward a contract to the City regarding the conditions related to the expenditure of these funds. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this resolution will allow the City Of Atascadero to apply for $492,000 in grant funds specifically allocated for Atascadero Youth/ Community Center. ALTERNATIVES: None • ATTACHMENTS: Attachment#1- Draft Resolution regarding the Atascadero Youth/Community Center 045 DRAFT RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE APPLICANT TO APPLY FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE ATASCADERO YOUTH CENTER, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECT#GF-40-003. WHEREAS,the Legislature and Governor of the State of California have approved a grant for the project shown above; and WHEREAS, the California Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the grant project, setting up necessary procedures; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Department of Parks and Recreation require the governing body to certify by resolution the approval of application before submission of said application to the State, and WHEREAS,the Grantee will enter into a Contract with the State of California for subject Proj ect(s); NOW, THEREFORE,. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Approves the filing of an application for local assistance for the above • project; and SECTION 2. Certifies that Grantee has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project; and SECTION 3. Certifies that Grantee has reviewed,"understands and agrees to the General Provisions contained in the Contract shown in the Procedural Guide; and SECTION 4. Appoints the City Manager as agent to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to applications, agreements, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project. On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: • 046 ADOPTED: July 24, 2001 CITY OF ATASCADERO J. Michael Arrambide, Mayor ATTEST: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney 047 ITEM NUMBER: A-7 DATE: 07/24/2001 R 1818 0 1-97-9 Atascadero City Council Staff Report — Community Services Department Agreement with the Atascadero Art Association to Rehabilitate "The Wood Nymphs" RECOMMENDATION: Council authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with the Atascadero Art Association to remove, restore and re-install the "The Wood Nymphs" marble statue located in the Sunken Gardens and to allocate $10,000.00 in Proposition 12 Per Capita Grant funds to the Atascadero Art Association for this project. DISCUSSION: The Atascadero Art Association has initiated an effort to restore "The Wood Nymphs," the marble statue located in the Sunken Gardens. "The Wood Nymphs" statue is deteriorating and is in serious need of restoration. The Atascadero Art Association is requesting permission from the City of Atascadero to initiate this restoration project. Staff feels that with certain stipulations outlined in the proposed agreement (Attachment 41), the Atascadero Art Association is the appropriate organization to spearhead this restoration effort. Background: Susan Beatie, Atascadero resident and advocate for the Arts, has secured the support of the Atascadero Art Association in an effort to raise funds for the restoration and potential relocation of"The Wood Nymphs." "The Wood Nymphs," also referred to as "The Bacchantes" is the statue located in the Sunken Gardens. It is well documented that this statue, a gift to the residents of Atascadero from E. G. Lewis, is in serious need of restoration. A 1997 report by ETHOS, conservators from Hearst Castle, noted extensive damage and recommended restoration and relocation to a more protected location. (Attachment#2) Summary: The Atascadero Art Association is requesting permission from the City of Atascadero to remove, rehabilitate and re-install "The Wood Nymphs." (Attachment #1) The Atascadero Art Association is requesting that the City permit the removal of the statue to a conservator's studio. At this location, the statue will be evaluated, cleaned, repaired and restored. Following this restoration effort, the statue would be returned to its present location or to an alternate location if so determined by the City of Atascadero. The Atascadero Art Association will be responsible to secure the necessary funds for the completion of this project. 048 ITEM NUMBER: A-7 DATE: 07/24/2001 Analysis: Staff met with Susan Beatie and members of the Wood Nymphs Restoration Committee to discuss the project and to develop recommended terms and conditions for the project. Under the terms of the proposed agreement, the Atascadero Art Association will be responsible to do the following: 1. Secure all necessary funding for the restoration project. 2. Provide City of Atascadero with Certificate of Insurance for the repair or replacement of the Wood Nymphs statue in the event of damage or loss during the restoration project. 3. Remove and transport the Wood Nymphs statue to the conservators, and to transport the statue back to Atascadero and reinstall in a location to be determined by the City ofAtascadero. 4. Provide the City of Atascadero with evidence of the necessary project funds prior to removal of the Wood Nymphs statue. 5. Serve as the Fiscal Agent for the Wood Nymphs Restoration Project. 6. Contract with the Conservator, monitor and approve all restoration work. 7. Agree to hold the City of Atascadero harmless for any injuries, damages or claims arising out of the Wood Nymphs Restoration Project. On Thursday, June 21, 2001, the Atascadero Parks and Recreation Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed terms and conditions of the draft agreement with the Atascadero Art Association for the restoration of "The Wood Nymphs." FISCAL IMPACT: $10,000.00 from the City of Atascadero Proposition 12 Per Capita funds has been allocated in the 2001-2002 Fiscal Year budget toward the Wood Nymphs Restoration Project. ALTERNATIVES: None ATTACHMENTS: Attachment#1- Agreement between the City Of Atascadero and the Atascadero Art Assoc. Attachment#2- Conservators Evaluation of the Condition of the "The Wood Nymphs" Attachment#3- Correspondence from the Atascadero Art Association 049 AGREEMENT BETWEEN ATASCADERO ART ASSOCIATION AND THE CITY OF ATASCADERO This Agreement is made and entered into this date July 24, 2001, by and between the City of Atascadero, and the Atascadero Art Association, for the right to remove, rehabilitate, restore and re- install the `Wood Nymphs" statuary in the Sunken Gardens. 1. PARTIES 1.1 City 1.1.1 The City of Atascadero, Atascadero, California, whose mailing address for notice under the terms of this Agreement is as follows: City of Atascadero Attn: Director of Community Services 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, California 93422 1.2 Atascadero Art Association 1.2.1 Atascadero Art Association whose mailing address for notice under the terms of this Agreement is as follows: Atascadero Art Association P.O. Box 28 Atascadero, California 93423 2. TERMS The term of this agreement shall begin on August 1, 2001, subject to extension or sooner termination as hereinafter provided, this agreement shall continue for the term of three (3) years, with an option for an additional one year term upon mutual consent of both parties. 2.1 Obligations of Atascadero Art Association 1. Secure all necessary funding for the statuary restoration project. Provide the City of Atascadero with a certificate of insurance for the repair or replacement of the Wood Nymphs statue in the event of damage or loss during the restoration project. The Art Association will remove and transport the statue to conservators, and transport the statue back to Atascadero and re-install it in a location to be determined by the City of Atascadero. The Association will provide the City of Atascadero with evidence of the necessary project funds prior to the removal of the Wood Nymphs statue. The Association will serve as the fiscal agent for the 1 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO �(�V AND ATASCADERO ART ASSOCIATION restoration project and contract with the Conservator for the restoration work. The Association will oversee all aspects of the restoration, including the monitoring and approval of all work. The Association will agree to hold the City of Atascadero harmless for any injuries, damages or claims arising out of the Wood Nymphs Restoration Project. 2.2 Oblilzations of the City The City of Atascadero agrees to contribute $10,000 during the Fiscal Year 2001- 2002 to the Wood Nymph restoration project. 3. INDEMNIFICATION: Atascadero Art Association hereby agrees to, and shall, hold City, its elective and appointive boards, officers, agents and employees, harmless and shall defend the same from any liability for damage or claims for damage, or suits or actions at law or in equity which may allegedly arise from Atascadero Art Association or any of Atascadero Art Association members' or agents' negligent operations or failure to perform under this agreement, whether such operations be by Atascadero Art Association or by any one or more persons directly or indirectly employed by, or acting as agent for, Atascadero Art Association. 4. INSURANCE: Atascadero Art Association shall not commence its services under this agreement until they have obtained all insurance required under this agreement and such insurance shall have been approved by City as to form, amount and carrier: (1) Property Damage Insurance. In an amount of not less than $ 500,000.00 for damage to the property of the City of Atascadero on account of any one occurrence. C. Proof of Insurance. Atascadero Art Association shall furnish City, concurrently with the execution hereof, with satisfactory proof of carriage of the insurance required, and adequate legal assurance that each carrier will give City at least thirty (30) days prior notice of the cancellation of any policy during the effective period of this contract. The certificate or policy of liability of insurance shall name City as an additional insured with the Atascadero Art Association. 2 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AND ATASCADERO ART ASSOCIATION 5. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 5.01 TERMINATION OF NOTICE: Notwithstanding any other provision of this agreement, any party hereto may terminate this agreement, at any time, without cause by giving at least� days prior written notice to the other parties to this agreement. 5.02 TERMINATION ON OCCURRENCE OF STATED EVENTS: This agreement shall terminate automatically on the occurrence of any of the following events: (1) Bankruptcy or insolvency of any party; (2) The end of the (30) days as set forth in Section 4.01; (3) End of the contract to which Atascadero Art Association's services were necessary; or (4) Assignment of this agreement by Atascadero Art Association without the consent of the City. 5.03 TERMINATION BY ANY PARTY FOR DEFAULT: Should any party default in the performance of this agreement or materially breach any of its provisions, a non-breaching party, at their option, may terminate this agreement, immediately, by giving written notice of termination to the breaching party. 5.04. TERMINATION: This agreement shall terminate on August 1, 2004, unless extended as set forth in this Section. The City, with the agreement of the Atascadero Art Association, is authorized to extend the term of this agreement beyond the termination date, as needed, under the same terms and conditions set forth in this agreement. Any such extension shall be in writing and be an amendment to this agreement. 6. ALTERATIONS Minor alterations to this agreement may be made in mutual agreement by the Assistant City Manager and the President of Atascadero Art Association. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Lease on the date set forth opposite their respective names. 3 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO _ 0 J 2 AND ATASCADERO ART ASSOCIATION CITY OF ATASCADERO Attest: Date: MARCIA MCCLURE TORGERSON, City Clerk Date: WADE G.MCKINNEY, CITY MANAGER ATASCADERO ART ASSOCIATION Date: President, Atascadero Art Association 4 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO O J AND ATASCADERO ART ASSOCIATION ITEM NUMBER: A-8 DATE: 07/24/2001 Big 1 01 iaia � ie a Atascadero City Council Staff Report — Community Services Department Proposition 12 Per Capita Program Grant Funds RECOMMENDATION: Council approve the draft Resolution authorizing the City Manager to apply for Grant Funds from the Per Capita Program under the Safe Neighborhood, Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. DISCUSSION: The State of California Department of Parks and Recreation administers the funds from voter approved Proposition 12, the Safe Neighborhood, Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. The City of Atascadero has been allocated $234,000 from the Prop 12 Per Capita Program, which is available for use on a variety of Parks and Recreation related improvements. The City Council through the adoption of the budget for Fiscal Years 2001-2003, allocated the $234,000.00 in Per Capita funds from Proposition 12. A list of the Capital Improvement Projects previously approved for funding by the City Council through Prop 12 is attached. (Attachment #2) The Procedural Guide prepared by the State of California Department of Parks and Recreation requires that the governing body of each agency certify by resolution the authorization of the Grantee to apply for the Per Capita Allocation. The State of California Department of Parks and Recreation, following the submission of this resolution, will draft and forward a contract to the City regarding the conditions related to the expenditure of the Prop 12 Per Capita funds. A separate resolution will be required to authorize staff to apply for the funds allocated by the State of California for the Atascadero Youth/Community Center. 054 ITEM NUMBER: A-8 DATE: 07/24/2001 • FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this resolution will allow the City of Atascadero to apply for$234,000 in grant funds specifically allocated for Parks and Recreation related improvements. ALTERNATIVES: None ATTACHMENTS: Attachment#1- Draft Resolution regarding Prop 12 funds Attachment#2- Parks, Recreation&Zoo-Capital Improvement Projects List 055 DRAFT RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, 0 CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE APPLICANT TO APPLY FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE PER CAPITA GRANT PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR,AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000. WHEREAS,the Legislature and Governor of the State of California have approved a grant for the above Program; and WHEREAS, the California Department of Parks and Recreation has been given the responsibility for the administration of the grant program, setting up necessary procedures; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Department of Parks and Recreation require the governing body to certify by resolution the approval of the Grantee to apply for the Per Capita Allocation, and WHEREAS, the Grantee will enter into a Contract with the State of California for subject Project(s); NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Approves the filing for local assistance funds from the Per Capita Grant Program under the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000; and SECTION 2. Certifies that Grantee has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the Project(s); and SECTION 3. Certifies that Grantee has reviewed, understands and agrees to the General Provisions contained in the Contract shown in the Procedural Guide; and SECTION 4. Appoints the City Manager as agent to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to applications, agreements, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of Project(s). On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: July 24, 2001 0 5 G T O Y+. C N �t �f N ',tLe 69 69 69 16969 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 6f9 6-� 69 69 69 69 69 690). 69 69 69 69 69 69 6% Nt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p0 0 0 0p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 0 Lo 0 0 0 0 Lo 0 0 0 tq O �A �C) M r r1' r wr N 0 frU7 0 N M r4 7 O N N fM W •V N O N r 69 69 69 69 69 fA 69 60 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 Vi 69 f9 f9 69 64 b9 f9 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 cn W O Z,o. O G O � � z { LL t D =. LU z a a- J O ado? VWmz W z= U m W. O a) I ;,-- s � ssssog � so � sss00a o r. 0 M N � M •f M 0 r N N M M a r N Q N LO :..�.0. r N u� N N` 6,116.31 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 49 69 69 69 69 E9 69 69 69 49 69 69 69 69 f9 69 f9 69 U c.) CD f N fd co w w O O O Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y a_ a. a. m a. m a_ a• m a• N N N iY 14 - x x O a) N a) a) () a) a) () a) Y Y Y of ca cd cd «1 tC c0 N c0 cC c0 c� Nm a. a. m m 41 fA N Y Y Y Y .Y -C Y Y Y Y U U U m a. a. a. a. a. a. a. C C C C C V O cO t� a1 O O O Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y U a) a) a) a) ,,Q J J J J J a d O () a) a) a) d a) a) a) a) 0 d 0 'O O •0 d 'd 0 02 0 0 20 0 0` 0 0 0 co co co aO 0C C C C a) a) a) a. a. a UUUUUUUUUUUUU' C7 U' C7 C7 ca (0 cd co fd cC (0 (! c0 (o t0 N N a) fd CO co R) c0 Rf f� cd (0 o fd (� a) N N U U U U U U U U o 0 o U U -c E E E E E E E E E E E E * ca 0 c`v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c c c c c L L C n) f0 fC 5 fi) to a iC a! «f () a 7 7 7 7 7CIS � Q ¢ ¢ ¢ QQ ¢ Q ¢ QUUUa. a. a. a. a. a• a• a. a_ a cLcL nvnv5v cn 4 Yy ry. 'd r k w7` (D c E p N c6 O c EZ" m 0) N .. a ` C N O a) Q h fn C v i C U O ro 22 o ° m aci E ccc x a) v ; a) aci c °� cv y as is E E a> c a) �' co C CD E o u v a) cu t� cu .. C w cu cn E E C a) U co Eo Q c cn N N cu (a y O w U N i N p N p C Z CL CL w a) U c a L co a r C i C cu d ' f� - L L Q C O w CL LL m o a_ Q U rn cn a) o U) a v C� a) E � L a) N c p v E W U` c c = () cm c m OC a) _ c Ocl >co U — O U _ v a) rn m m L J L O C C G7 U O (� Co cO J U co a) 7 C u (0 a) 7 C C U O — r- C a) .V— 3 C y W V) LL. m O —_ O U U F- > c p a) io lL r. fd O C C Q O C � a. a) co C •a N id «s G7 y C1 cC Co 'o ct) cn '0 O U CO O •D O C "a U V O > C'I ` N U O O C m U a)CL 4. C (n = C � U C2 '(1) a E a) CO O m C ca LL U C O a) U C lL Y a) a) c0 cc LL S Co n c ca C7 — N (n E °C 0 cd E v o � 1' , 0 Q. Oi L j a) m N YN �' L U d d t t -Y N c"0 E2 OCL � > 7 E d 0 0 0 s ar y Nw o O 5 20 cc :o U (nJ COOP- U' JQF- (nJ � F- tnU (n � W � F- � C3fn (n � � F- U5� V V ca 6F). 619, 60 69 60 643, to Q Cl) Lf) lV 0 r O O N fH 6% (fl d9 ffl ffl 4% S O O O N N 69 6c# O 8 O V C) fA ffl 69 N r-+ O O 60 O 888F 8 40 � a a� U 8 (D 0 w «t cocti CO N U U U U U U S C O h (0 L C y J CO C O O 'O O y V 7 r m U N O C C C O cCf > O C CO :Y O > O y E E c d o 9: 0 Y Y O a cc) r _ 059 ITEM NUMBER: A-9 DATE: 07/24/2001 -con No .� pais n Atascadero City Council Staff Report — Community Services Department Agreement with Atascadero Little League for Use of Paloma Creek Park Memorial Field RECOMMENDATION: Council authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Atascadero Little League Baseball for the use and upkeep of Paloma Creek Park Memorial Field. . DISCUSSION: Atascadero Little League Baseball is the primary user of Paloma Creek Park Little League Field. The Atascadero Little League organization has been instrumental in the maintenance and upkeep of this baseball field for many years, and has taken an active roll over the years in several improvement projects. In addition to assistance with routine maintenance such as infield dirt maintenance, Atascadero Little League has spearheaded improvement projects like the installation of outfield fencing. The City of Atascadero and the Atascadero Little League Baseball organization have maintained the Paloma Creek Park Little League Field through a "hand-shake" partnership that has helped keep this baseball field in excellent condition. This unwritten arrangement has been a benefit to both the City and Little League. Atascadero Little League and the City both have a desire for a clear understanding of responsibilities necessitating a written agreement. Essentially, City staff are seeking assistance from Little League for the maintenance and upkeep of the Paloma Creek Park Memorial Field. In exchange for assistance with maintenance, Little League is seeking some assurances regarding field use. Atascadero Little League seeks to be the priority user of the field. The City benefits from this arrangement by reducing our staffing cost to maintain this ball field. The volunteer labor provided by the Atascadero Little League organization saves the City an undetermined amount of manpower each year. In addition to the savings in manpower, the City also saves an indeterminate amount of money each year as a result of materials and services for Alvord field that are paid for by the Atascadero Little League organization. Staff believes that the proposed agreement will clarify these responsibilities and will provide mutual benefit to the City and to Atascadero Little League. 060 ITEM NUMBER: A-9 DATE: 07/24/2001 FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this agreement will save the City of Atascadero an undetermined amount of staff time and supplies. ALTERNATIVES: None ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Agreement between the City of Atascadero and Atascadero Little League s 061 AGREEMENT BETWEEN ATASCADERO LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL AND THE CITY OF ATASCADERO This Agreement is made and entered into this date July 24,2001,by and between the City of Atascadero, and the Atascadero Little League Baseball, for the maintenance, upkeep and use of Paloma Creek Park Memorial Baseball field during the period from February 1, 2002 until December 31,2004. 1. PARTIES 1.1 City 1.1.1 The City of Atascadero, Atascadero, California, whose mailing address for notice under the terms of this Agreement is as follows: City of Atascadero Attn: Director of Community Services 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, California 93422 1.2 Atascadero Little League Baseball 1.2.1 Atascadero Little League Baseball is whose mailing address for notice under the terms of this Agreement is as follows: Atascadero Little League Baseball P.O. Box 2375 Atascadero, California 93423 2. TERMS The term of this agreement shall begin on February 1, 2002. Subject to extension or sooner termination as hereinafter provided, this agreement shall continue for the term of three (3) years, with an option for 3 additional years upon mutual consent of both parties. 1 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AND ATASCADERO LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL 062 li ations of Atascadero Little 2.1 Ob � League Baseball 1. Infield material (dirt) maintenance from February 1 S`until August 1" each year, (including base pegs) and all associated costs, under supervision of the parks representative. 2. Maintenance and repair of the Little League concession stand and storage buildings (structural, electrical, plumbing, etc). 3. Remove all trash and litter from the playing field areas and place in the trash receptacles provided after any field use. 4. Provide one Porti-potty facility from March V through July 15`h. or until Little League All- Star activities conclude for the season. 5. Submit a written request with appropriate plans in advance for any desired physical changes or improvements to existing facility, such as lighting, batting cages, pitching warm-up areas, etc. Financial responsibility for any proposed improvements will be the responsibility of Atascadero Little League. 2.2 Obligations of the City 1. Extend priority use of Paloma Creek Park Memorial Baseball Field to Atascadero Little League, free of charge, from February 1 S`until August 1 S`each year. Atascadero Little League Baseball may reserve the Paloma Creek Park Memorial Baseball Field during their priority use period for other organizations such as District level tournaments. Atascadero Little League will secure a signed acknowledgement from the other organizations, agreeing to financial responsibility for any property damage. 2. Year-around outfield and infield mowing. Aeration, fertilizing and over-seeding when necessary. 3. Perimeter weeding and spraying of pre-emergent herbicide, including fence lines and warning track. 4. Irrigation timing and repairs. 5. Empty Trash cans 6. Bleacher, fence and gate repairs 7. Set-up and takedown the portable T-ball backstops when required. 3. INDEMNIFICATION: Atascadero Little League hereby agrees to, and shall, hold City, its elective and appointive boards, officers, agents and employees, harmless and shall defend the same from any liability for damage or claims for damage, or suits or actions at law or in equity which may allegedly arise from Atascadero Little League or any of Atascadero Little League's employees' or agents' negligent operations or failure to perform under this agreement, whether such operations be by Atascadero Little League or by any one or more persons directly or indirectly employed by, or acting as agent for, Atascadero Little League. 2 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AND ATASCADERO LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL 063 04. INSURANCE: Atascadero Little League shall not commence its services under this agreement until they have obtained all insurance required under this section and such insurance shall have been approved by City as to form, amount and carrier: a. Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance. Atascadero Little League shall take out and maintain during the life of this contract such public liability and property damage insurance as shall protect City, its elective and appointive boards, officers, agents and employees, and Contractor and any agents and employees performing work covered by this contract from claims for damages for personal injury, including death, as well as from claims for property damage which may arise from Contractor's or any subcontractor's operations under this contract, whether such operations be by Contractor or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by contractor and the amounts of such insurance shall be as follows: (1) Public Liability Insurance. In an amount not less than $1,000,000.00 for injuries, including, but not limited to death to any one person and, subject to the same limit for each person, in an amount not less than $500.000.00 on account of any one occurrence; (2) Property Damage Insurance. In an amount of not less than $ 500,000.00 for damage to the property of each person on account of any one occurrence. C. Proof of Insurance. Atascadero Little League shall furnish City, concurrently with the execution hereof, with satisfactory proof of carriage of the insurance required, and adequate legal assurance that each carrier will give City at least thirty (30) days' prior notice of the cancellation of any policy during the effective period of this contract. The certificate or policy of liability of insurance shall name City as an additional insured with the Atascadero Little League. 5. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 5.01 TERMINATION OF NOTICE: Notwithstanding any other provision of this agreement, any party hereto may terminate this agreement, at any time, without cause by giving at least 30 days prior written notice to the other parties to this agreement. 5.02 TERMINATION ON OCCURRENCE OF STATED EVENTS: This agreement shall terminate automatically on the occurrence of any of the following events: 3 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AND ATASCADERO LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL 064 (1) Bankruptcy or insolvency of any party; (2) The end of the (30) days as set forth in Section 4.01; (3) End of the contract to which Atascadero Little League's services were necessary; or (4) Assignment of this agreement by Atascadero Little League without the consent of the City. 5.03 TERMINATION BY ANY PARTY FOR DEFAULT: Should any party default in the performance of this agreement or materially breach any of its provisions, a non-breaching party, at their option, may terminate this agreement, immediately, by giving written notice of termination to the breaching party. 5.04. TERMINATION: This agreement shall terminate on January 31, 2005, unless extended as set forth in this Section. The City, with the agreement of the Atascadero Little League, is authorized to extend the term of this agreement beyond the termination date, as needed, under the same terms and conditions set forth in this agreement. Any such extension shall be in writing and be an amendment to this agreement. 6. ALTERATIONS Minor alterations to this agreement may be made in mutual agreement by the Director of Community Services and the President of Atascadero Little League. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Lease on the date set forth opposite their respective names. CITY OF ATASCADERO Attest: Date: MARCIA MCCLURE TORGERSON, City Clerk Date: WADE G. MCKINNEY, CITY MANAGER ATASCADERO LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL Date: President, Atascadero Little League Baseball 4 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AND ATASCADERO LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL GG5 ITEM NUMBER: A- 10 DATE: 07/24/2001 1918 19 9 A moi Atascadero City Council Staff Report — Police Department Public Safety Communication Center Digital Recording System Purchase RECOMMENDATION: Council authorize the purchase of a Dynamic Instruments brand Digital Recording System from Durham Communications. DISCUSSION: On December 12, 2000, Council authorized the allocation of 2000-01 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant funds for the purchase of a digital voice recording system for use in the public safety communication center. The Police Department conducted research, observed demonstrations and compared features of four different systems. The Dynamic Instruments brand system offered by Durham Communications provides the features that best meet current and future needs of the Department. The City of Lompoc purchased the same system on 9/28/2000 following a formal Request for Proposal and Sealed Bid Procedure. Per the City of Atascadero Purchasing Policy, if an award is made under these conditions for a similar system, the bid procedure can be waived. The City of Lompoc Request for Proposal No. 2016 and purchase order along with the bid to the City of Atascadero are attached. . The price quoted to the City of Atascadero is for the same recording system with some minor differences in accessories. FISCAL IMPACT: $13,804 provided entirely by grant funds previously authorized by Council. • ATTACHMENTS: Bid from Durham Communications City of Lompoc RFP and Purchase Order _ 066 rRI 15:27 FAX 4800817146 DCI U005 DURHAM COMMUNICATIONS,INC. DYNAMIC INSTRUMENTS,INC.2001 DIGITAL RECORDER PRICE LIST April 4.2000 DI-936 PRO DIGITAL DESKTOP RECORDER 32 CH CAPABLE Standard System Includes: DUAL 6.2 GB DVD DRIVES.Network card, 21 GB Hard Drive, SVGA Color Display,Keyboard,Mouse w/Pad,Operators Manual, 2000 Hr.Instant Recall,mufti-channel display and floppy disk drive for System upgrade. Sustem includes full reports package and Multi-level Password Security. DESCRIPTION MODEL# QTY LIST PRICE EXTENDED DI-936PRO2-DUAL 8.2 GB DVD 8 CHANNEL DIGITAL RECORDING SYSTEM DI-936PRO-DV02-A8 15455 16 CHANNEL DIGITAL RECORDING SYSTEM DI-936PRO-DVD2•A16 1 18200 $18,200.00 24 CHANNEL DIGITAL RECORDING SYSTEM DI-936PRO-DVD2-A24 21820 32 CHANNEL DIGITAL RECORDING SYSTEM DI-936PRO-DVD2-A32 26360 DI-936PRO2&DI-939E OPTIONS: SOFTWARE COURIER REMOTE SOFTWARE COURIER-1 770 COURIER SITE LICENSE COURIER-5 1925 COURIER SITE LICENSE COURIER-10 3075 COURIER SITE LICENSE COURIER-11 3850 COURIER TELEPHONE INTERFACE MOD TM-1 655 REBOUND RECALL SOFTWARE REBOUND 770 NETFLARE SITE LICENSE NETFLARE 495 CAD OUTPUT KIT CAD 3230 CAD OUTPUT-6 CALLER PORTS ANUCALLER ID 4570 MF-ANI-6 PORT KIT MF ANI 5225 ACCESSORIES DUAL CASETTE RE-RECORDER 2003-0004 505 RACK MOUNT KIT FOR RE-RECORDER 1420-0006 145 UPS POWER SUPPLY-8-40 CH SYSTEMS UPS-8-40 665 UPS POWER SUPPLY-48-104 CH SYSTEMS UPS-48-104 1430 MEDIA DVD DISK-5.2 GB 1901-0078 50 (FACTORYDISCOUNTJ ($6,000.00) TOTAL DI-936 PRO EQUIPMENT $12,200.00 SALES TAX ��� 0 0 INSTALLATION $750.00 TOTAL SYSTEM $12,950.00 �13, $d`�•UO INSTALLATION INCLUDES INTERFACING RECORDER WITH CUTOMER PROVIDED WIRING AT THE DESIRED LOCATION OF THE RECORDER. ALL TELEPHONE AND RADIO TERMINATIONS NEED TO BE MARKED OR DESIGNATED FOR EASY IDENTIFICATION. INSTALLATION ALSO INCLUDES WORKING WITH CUSTOMERS TELEPHONE PROVIDER IF INTERFACING WITH A DIGITAL TELEPHONE SWITCH. WE WILL ALSO WORK WITH CUSTOMERS COMPUTER COMPANY WHERE SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE INTERFACE IS REQUIRED INTO THE NETWORK SYSTEM. 067 May 24 01 09: 11a Purchasing 740-4790 10. 1 From: :FX-2"$10 Tm, r1�lj 16 03:03:41 2000 P 03-27-20C)0 14::-)0 P.01 i (22299QW (Mir r 1 Xd0Wj1P0C raLNT OF FLOW"$ Request for Proposal RNP No. 2016 Digital Communications Recorder Today is March 22,2000 Notice is hereby given that sealed ,)roposals will be received for a DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS RECORDER per the attached specifications, at the office of the Purchasing and Materials Manager, 1300 West Laurel Avenue,Lompoc,California,until 2:OOPM, April 12, 2000. Proposals will not be publicly opened and read. If further information is needcd, contact Ray Ambler by fax at(805) 735-7628. Please immediately complete the Proposer Contact Information Sheet and fax to(805)735-7628 to be added to the list to receive all clarifications and addendums. It is the responsibility of the proposer to see that any proposal submitted shall have sufficient time to be received by the Purchasing Office prior to proposal opening time. Late proposals will be returned to the proposer unopened. The receiving time in the Purchasing Office will be the governing time for acceptability of proposals. Proposals will not be accepted by telephone or facsimile machine all proposals must bear o;iglaal signatures and figures. Ray Ambler Purchasing and Materials Manager Dated: March 23, 2000 Published: March 29, 2000 CITY HALL,100 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA,P.O. 8001,LOMPOC,CA 93438-8001 PHONE:(805)875-8000; PAX:(805)735-7628 068 '/14/01 KION 11:49F4 X 4809817146 DCI [ 007 r- 2000 10:11 73� OF a1 IYN`11:49; F LO11AP0 PHONE: PURCHASE U. UCI"i u 8061138-1281 •1:".P.. .':. t 4A ... . .. T f, t.. . . PUR ASINO DIVISION EX 503 50121 09/Z8le0 P.O. BOX 8001 FAX: LOMPOC CA 93438-8001 605/735-7628 •Lr^'• �r .:::�$ �.+, Y 2:1s :'�:'.,':rT`�'':'i.;:.'!;r�::t:,2:^�%i 2F1::':; THIS "SHIP TO" INFORMATION MUST APPEAR ON Ai INVOICES AND SHIPPING LABELS. VENDOR: :;1; CITY OF LOMPOC ATTN, 5 0121 DURHAM COMMUNICATIONS POLICE DEPT. 4611 EAST VIRGINA STREET 107 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA MESA AZ 85215 LOMPOC, GA 93436 PHONE:.! FAX:450 _ DOC-I.Y�y E POLICE DEPT. 1100-Q-11 NET 30 DESTINATION. •Or TnO.• .. 1 1 JOB ALL LABOR AND MATERIAL FOR DELIVERY AND 22520.00 22520.00 INSTALLATION OF A DIGITAL. COMMUNICATIONS, ZECORDING'-SYBTEf9 DYNAMICS ; I�jSTRUMENT`S DT 9367, PRO..M2 Alb `. 2 1 EA MIRRORED MAGNETO OPTICAI, HARD DRIVE #H8 1768,00 1768.00 3 1 EA SILENT CODING #S1 850. 00 850.00 4 2 EA TAPE DUPLICATION DECK #2003-0004. 389.00 389 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS & CONDITIONS OV SID 2016. 5 1 EA REMOTE PLAYBACK & RETRIEVAL SOFTWARE 655 . 00 655 .00 COURIER PC SOFTWARE! 6 1 PEE LABOR - SEE INSURANCE INFORMATION 2100 .00 2100,00 CITY OF LOMPOC CONTACT CAPT. DAVE PEITZ (8.05 ) 875-8104 vt-T r�CTT -2. F06- INVOICE ©B•CX= Q: •„y,, ;! t� ' ,+zR ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT ' r• �, -. ,�.;:'°tl-'r, . . . 11100-74509 30311 .11 CITY OF LOMPOC - FINANCE DEPT - 50121 PO BOX 8001 LOMPOC CA 93438-8001 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. THIS ORDER NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED BELOW IP YOU ARE UNABLE TO FILL THIS ORDER OR INVOICE EXACTLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESCRIPTION, UNIT AND PRICE HEREON, CONTACT THE PURCHASING DIVISION FOR INSTRUCTIONS. ALL PRICES,TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS ORDER SHALL RAY AM E PURCHASING MANAGER BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF LOMPOC BID OR OUOTE NO. SHOWN BELOW, WHICH 19 INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. COUNTERSIGNATURE REQUIRED IF TOTAL P.O. IS OVER$10X0.00 ,SID OR QUOTE NO: 2016ENDOR CONDITIONS PRINTED ON REVERSE V y OR FAX'D WITH THIS ORDER SHALL BECOME A PART OF-`PHIS CONTRACT 069 ITEM NUMBER: A- 11 _ DATE: 07/24/2001 gin RM i Isis , 1979 CM1. Atascadero City Council Staff Report — Police Department Repeater Component Purchase Authorization Sealed Bid #2001-004 RECOMMENDATION: Council authorize the purchase of Radio Repeater Components contained in Bid#2001-004 from Durham Communications. DISCUSSION: The proposal to authorize funds to implement improvements to the public safety radio repeater system came before Council and was approved on January 23, 2001. A sealed bid process to receive bids on JPS brand voter equipment was initiated on June 13, 2001 and was conducted in accordance with the City purchasing policy. Four bids were opened on July 5, 2001 and are reflected on the attached bid summary prepared by the City Clerk. The bid summary shows Amerizon Wireless as the low bidder at $15,140.00, however, they did not include sales tax of$1086.77. The bid submitted by Durham Communications included tax as required and is the low bidder at $15,566.75. FISCAL IMPACT: $15,566.75 provided entirely by grant funds previously authorized by Council on January 23, 2001. ATTACHMENT: Bid Summary i 070 Cl'*ty of A Office of the City Clerk BID SUMMARY TO: Police Department FROM: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk BID NO.: 2001-004 OPENED: 7/5/01, 2:00 p.m. PROJECT: Repeater Components—Voter Equipment (4 ) Bids were received and opened today, as follows: Bidder Base Bid • Durham Communications $15,566.75 4611 E. Virginia Street Mesa, AZ Simulcast Solutions $15,925.00 18 Port Meadow Trail Fairport,NY 14450 Amerizon Wireless $15,140.00 3512 Cavalier Dr. Ft. Wayne, IN 46808 JPS Communications $15,920.00 5800 Departure Drive Raleigh,NC 27616 Attachments: 4 bids . 07 1 ITEM NUMBER: A- 12 DATE: 07/24/2001 518 1-97-9 Atascadero City Council Staff Report — Police Department Repeater Component Purchase Authorization Sealed Bid #2001-005 RECOMMENDATION: Council authorize the purchase of Radio Repeater Components contained in Bid#2001-005 from Applied Technology. DISCUSSION: The proposal to authorize funds to implement improvements to the public safety radio repeater system came before Council and was approved on January 23, 2001. A sealed bid process to receive bids on Kenwood brand radios was initiated on June 13, 2001 and was conducted in accordance with the City purchasing policy. Two bids were opened on July 5, 2001 and are "reflected on the attached bid summary prepared by the City Clerk. The bid summary shows Applied Technology as the low bidder at $8,992.64. FISCAL IMPACT: $8,992.64 provided entirely by grant funds previously authorized by Council on January 23, 2001. ATTACHMENT: Bid Summary 072 C1,6ty of A Office of the City Clerk BID SUMMARY TO: Police Department FROM: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk BID NO.: 2001-005 OPENED: 7/5/01, 2:00 p.m. PROJECT: Repeater Components—Kenwood Radios (2) Bids were received and opened today, as follows: Bidder Base Bid Applied Technology $ 8,992.64 4440 Easton Drive Bakersfield, CA 93309 Bassett Sales Corporation $15,121.85 12045 Magnolia Boulevard North Hollywood, CA 91607 Attachments: 2 bids 073 ITEM NUMBER: A- 13 _ DATE: 07/24/2001 • Aloin 's!■ i 1918 , 9 I. Atascadero City Council Staff Report — Police Department Repeater Component Purchase Authorization Sealed Bid #2001-006 RECOMMENDATION: Council authorize the purchase of Radio Repeater Components contained in Bid#2001-006 from Applied Technology. DISCUSSION: The proposal to authorize funds to implement improvements to the public safety radio repeater system came before Council and was approved on January 23, 2001. A sealed bid process to receive bids on Ericsson brand radios was initiated on June 13, 2001 and was conducted in accordance with the City purchasing policy. Three bids were opened on July 5, 2001 and are reflected on the attached bid summary prepared by the City Clerk. The bid summary shows Applied Technology as the low bidder at $15,530.16. FISCAL IMPACT: $15,530.16 provided entirely by grant funds previously authorized by Council on January 23, 2001. ATTACHMENT: Bid Summary 074 City of A Office of the City Clerk BID SUMMARY TO: Police Department FROM: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk ` BID NO.: 2001-006 OPENED: 7/5/01,2:00 p.m. PROJECT: Repeater Components—EricssonRadios (3) Bids were received and opened today, as follows: Bidder Base Bid Applied Technology $15,530.16 4440 Easton Drive Bakersfield, CA 93309 Ericsson Business Comm $16,371.44 500 Pointe Drive, Bldg. 40 Brea, CA 92821 Amerizon Wireless $17,447.00 3512 Cavalier Dr. Ft. Wayne, IN 46808 Attachments: 3 bids 075 ITEM NUMBER: A- 14 DATE: 07/24/2001 n iais a 1979 CAD�j Atascadero City Council Agenda Report - Public Works Department Routes to School San Gabriel Road and Santa Rosa Road Route to School RECOMMENDATION: Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Whitaker Contractor, Inc. to construct the Routes to School Project with a maximum project expenditure of $120,213.94, including contingencies and construction engineering and authorize the expenditure of $38,313.94 in Streets and Bridge Impact Fees for this project. i DISCUSSION: Bids were received for the subject project and publicly opened on July 9, 2001. The lowest bid was submitted by Whitaker Contractors, Inc. in the amount of$96,171.15. The project includes the following improvements: ■ Widen portions of roadway to provide pedestrian walkway ■ Stripe edge-line to delineate walkway from travel lane ■ Relocate signs, mailboxes and trim shrubbery within new walkway area A bid summary prepared by the City Clerk has been included for reference. The bids have been checked for completeness and accuracy and staff finds Whitaker Contractors, Inc. to be the lowest responsive bidder. 076 ITEM NUMBER: A- 14 DATE: 07/24/2001 FISCAL IMPACT: EXPENDITURES Construction $ 96,171.15 Contingencies @ 10% $ 9,617.12 Construction Engineering (Inspection, Contract Administration, Survey, Soils Testing) 15% $14,425.67 TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES $120,213.94 REVENUES State Transportation Program (STP)Funds $ 81,900.00 Streets and Bridge Impact Fees $38,313.94 TOTAL PROJECT REVENUES $120,213.94 ALTERNATIVES: 1. Award Contract 2. Do not Award Contract—pedestrian improvements will not be constructed. ATTACHMENTS: Bid Summary _ 077 City of A Office of the City Clerk BID SUMMARY TO: Public Works Department A FROM: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk 04 wf BID NO.: 2000-06 OPENED: 7/9/01, 2:00 p.m. PROJECT: San Gabriel Road & Santa Rosa Road Route to School Project (3) Bids were received and opened today, as follows: San Gabriel Santa Rosa Total Bid Bidder Road Road (San Gabriel & Base Bid Base Bid Santa Rosa Whitaker Contractors, Inc. $55,845.65 $40,325.50 $96,171.15 P.O. Box 910 Santa Margarita, CA 93453 (805) 438-5751 R. Burke Corporation $70,368.40 $59,210.00 $129,578.40 P.O. Box 957 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406-0957 (805) 543-8568 John Madonna Construction $72,578.00 $68,029.00 $1403607.00 P.O. Box 5310 San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 (805) 543-7751 Attachments: 3 bids 078 ITEM NUMBER: A- 15 _ DATE: 07/24/2001 r psis o isa Atascadero City Council Staff Report — Public Works Department Authorization to Purchase of Vehicles through the State Department of General Services RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt the draft Resolution authorizing the State Department of General Services to purchase vehicles on behalf of the City of Atascadero. • DISCUSSION: Background: Each year the State of California Department of General Services solicits bids for a wide variety of equipment, materials and services. Other governmental agencies are provided with the results of these bids and allowed to purchase these goods through the state for a service fee of 1% of the purchase price, to a maximum of$5,000. Considerable staff time is saved by eliminating the need to prepare specifications, advertise bids and evaluate results. Based upon previous purchases, the costs offered by the State are competitive. Staff is proposing to purchase three vehicles currently approved in the FY 2001-2002 Budget: Dept/Division Type of Vehicle Cost Public Works/Transit 22 passenger Transit Vehicle $44,980 Public Works/Wastewater Dodge BR2500 Pickup $23,640 Community Services/Facilities Dodge BE 2500 Pickup $22,500 TOTAL $91,120 FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the 2001-2002 Budget. 079 ITEM NUMBER: A- 15 DATE: 07/24/2001 ALTERNATIVES: Alternative #1 Council may choose not to adopt this resolution and direct staff to prepare documents and advertise for bids. Advantages: Potential for receiving lower bid. Disadvantages: Due to the excellent pricing available from the State of California, the potential for receiving a lower bid is remote. In addition, considerable staff time is saved using the state bid process. Alternative #2 Council may choose not to adopt this resolution and not approve the purchase of vehicles at this time. Advantages: Cost savings Disadvantages: Aging vehicles must be replaced on a regular basis to provide safe, reliable service. ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolution • 08Q DRAFT RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AUTHORIZING THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO PURCHASE VEHICLES ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO Be it resolved that the City Council of the City of Atascadero does hereby authorize the Procurement Division, Department of General Services of the State of California, to purchase vehicles for and on behalf of the City of Atascadero pursuant to Section 10324 of the California Public Contract Code, and that the Director of Public Works, is hereby directed to sign and deliver all necessary requests and other documents in connection therewith for and on behalf of the City of Atascadero. On motion by Councilmember , and seconded by Councilmember , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO By MARCIA MCCLURE TORGERSON J. MICHAEL ARRAMBIDE City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROY A. HANLEY City Attorney ITEM NUMBER: A- 16 DATE: 07/24/2001 '■ vim 311111I i to—is �I 1 e Atascadero City Council Agenda Report — Public Works Department Public Highway Crossing Agreement Union Pacific Railroad (Chico Road) RECOMMENDATION: Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with the Union Pacific Railroad Company establishing an easement for public access and allowing for improvement of the existing crossing. DISCUSSION: As a condition of development of The Lakes project, Midland Pacific is required to improve the railroad crossing at Chico Road. In subsequent correspondence with Union Pacific Railroad, it was determined that a formal easement does not exist for the current crossing. This Agreement will establish an easement for public access and allow for improvement of the existing crossing. FISCAL IMPACT: Payment of$2,646.00 to Union Pacific Railroad will be paid by the developer. ATTACHMENTS: New Public Highway Crossing Agreement 082- PHC 880706 Folder No.: 1967-72 Form Approved,AVP-Law Agreement Number NEW PUBLIC HIGHWAY CROSSING AGREEMENT CHICO ROAD MILE POST 221.77 - COAST SUBDIVISION . ATASCADERO, SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the day of , 200 , by and between UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation to be addressed at 1800 Farnam Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68102 (hereinafter the "Railroad") and the CITY OF ANTASCADERO, a municipal corporation of the State of California to be addressed at 6500 Palma Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422, atm, Steven B. Kahn, Director of Public Projects, Phone: 805-461-5020 (hereinafter the "Political Body"), WITNESSETH: RECITALS: The Political Body desires to undertake as its project the relocation and widening of the existing Chico Road at-grade public road crossing (hereinafter the "Project"). The Political Body desires the right to use for the Project that portion of the right-of-way of the Railroad at 221.77 on the Coast Subdivision(hereinafter the "Crossing Area") shown on the attached print dated April 2, 2001, . marked Exhibit A. AGREEMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: ARTICLE 1 - RAILROAD GRANTS RIGHT For and in consideration of the Political Body's agreement to perform and abide by the terms of this Agreement, including Exhibits A-1, A-2, A-3, B, B-1 and C, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof, the Railroad hereby grants to the Political Body, the right to establish, construct, maintain, repair, renew, and use a public highway at grade over and across the Crossing Area, together with the right of entry to control and remove from the Railroad's right-of-way, on each side of the Crossing Area, weeds and vegetation which may obstruct the view of motorists, approaching the Crossing Area, to any trains that may also be approaching the Crossing Area. ARTICLE 2- . COMPENSATION In consideration of the rights granted herein, the Political Body does hereby agree to pay to the Railroad the sum of TWO THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED FOURTY-SIX DOLLARS ($2,646.00). ARTICLE 3 - CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE A. Before any work on the Premises begins, the Political Body (as defined in Section 8(a) of Exhibit B to this Agreement) will provide the Railroad with a Certificate issued by its insurance carrier providing the insurance coverage required pursuant to Exhibit B-1 of this Agreement in a policy containing the following endorsement: • "Union Pacific Railroad Company is named as additional insured with respect to all liabilities arising 1967-72- City of Atascadero,CA- Page 1 July 16,2001 Chico Road 083 PHC 880706 Folder No.: 1967-72 Form Approved,AVP-Law out of Insured's performance of the work required for the relocation and widening of the existing Chico Road at-grade public road crossing." B. The Political Body is self-insured. C.. All insurance correspondence shall be directed to: Union Pacific Railroad Company, 1800 Farnam Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68102, with reference to Folder No. 1967-72. D. The Political Body may self-insure all or a portion of the insurance coverage required hereunder, subject to Railroad's review and approval. However, the Political Body's contractor/subcontractor (if any) shall obtain and provide evidence of insurance coverage pursuant to Exhibit B-1 of this agreement. ARTICLE 4 - IF WORK IS TO BE PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR If a contractor is to perform any of the work on the Project (including initial construction and subsequent relocation or substantial maintenance and repair work), then the Political Body shall require its contractor to execute the Railroad's Right of Entry Agreement. Political Body acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Right of Entry Agreement and understanding of its terms, provisions, and requirements, and will inform its contractor of the need to execute the Agreement. Under no circumstances will Political Body's contractor be allowed onto Railroad's premises without first executing the Right of Entry Agreement. ARTICLE 5 - FEDERAL AID HIGHWAY PROGRAM The Project is not financed in whole or in part from funds appropriated by the Federal government. ARTICLE 6 WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY THE RAILROAD A. The Railroad may make any and all changes, alterations or relocations, whether temporary or permanent, and may provide flagging and other protective services and devices, which in the Railroad's judgment may be or become necessary or expedient within the Railroad's right-of-way because of the Project. Such work shall include, without limitation, the installation of new concrete panels. B. The Railroad shall, at the sole cost and expense of the Political Body, maintain, repair, and replace the warning devices installed hereunder; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that this provision shall not negate the Railroad's eligibility for any further federal, state or local or other public funds that may become available for the maintenance of said devices; and PROVIDED, FURTHER, that the cost of repair or replacement resulting from damage caused by non-parties that is not recoverable by the Railroad from the non-parties shall be borne entirely by the Political Body C. The Political Body agrees to pay the Railroad 100% of the actual cost of the Railroad's work performed and materials supplied as hereinabove set forth, which includes customary additives to materials services provided by the Railroad as shown on Exhibit C, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof, which is attached hereto and herby made a part hereof. ARTICLE 7 - EFFECTIVE DATE; TERM This Agreement shall become effective as of the date first herein written, or the date work commences on the Project, whichever is earlier, and shall continue in full force and effect until terminated as herein provided. 1967-72- City of Atascadero,CA- Page 2 July 16,2001 Chico Road . G*8 4 PHC 880706 Folder No.: 1967-72 Form Approved,AVP-Law IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed in duplicate as of the date first herein written. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY By Asst.Vice President-Contracts&Real Estate ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO By Title: Resolution No.: Pursuant to Resolution/Order dated: (Seal) , 200_ hereto attached. 1967-72- City of Atascadero,CA- Page 3 July 16,2001 Chico Road o O J July 16, 2001 Folder No. 1967-72 MR STEVEN B KAHN CITY OF ATASCADERO 6500 PALMA AVE ATASCADERO CA 93422 Dear Mr. Kahn: RE: Proposed reconstruction of a public road crossing known as Chico Road at Atascadero, CA. Attached are duplicate originals of a Public Road Crossing Agreement covering your use of the Railroad Company's right-of-way. To properly document your use of the Railroad Company's property, it is necessary that you execute the attached documents. Please return to me in the enclosed envelope the following: 1. ALL of the executed documents. If a Contractor's Right-of-Entry Agreement is attached hereto, you may submit the executed Contractor's Right-of-Entry documentation upon selection of a contractor. 2. Certificate of Insurance, if required. 3. Resolution for document execution, if required. 4. Check made payable to the Union Pacific Railroad Company in the amount of$2,646.00. if you require formal billing, you may consider this letter as a formal bill. In compliance with the Internal Revenue Services' new policy regarding their Form 1099, I certify that 94-6001323 is the Railroad Company's correct Federal Taxpayer Identification Number and that Union Pacific Railroad Company is doing business as a corporation. If we have not received the executed documents within six months from the date of this letter, this proposed offer of an agreement is withdrawn and becomes null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me at telephone number (402) 997-3620 or contact me via e-mail at pgfarrell@up.com. Sincerely yours, PAUL G. FARRELL MANAGER CONTRACTS r� 088 PHC 880301 Standard Form Approved,AVP-Law EXHIBIT B Public Highway Crossing SECTION i- CONDITIONS AND COVENANTS a) The Railroad makes no covenant or warranty of title for quiet possession or against encumbrances.The Political Bodv shall not use or permit use of the Crossing Area for any purposes other than those described in this Agreement. Without limiting the foregoing, the Political Body shall not use or permit use of the Crossing Area for railroad purposes,or for gas,oil or gasoline pipe lines. Any lines constructed on the Railroad's property by or under authority of the Political Body for the purpose of conveying electric power or communications incidental to the Political Body's use of the property for highway purposes shall be constructed in accordance with specifications and requirements of the Railroad,and in such manner as not adversely to affect communication or signal lines of the Railroad or its licensees now or hereafter located upon said property. No nonparty shall be admitted by the Political Body to use or occupy any part of the Railroad's property without the Railroad's written consent. Nothing herein shall obligate the Railroad to give such consent. b) The Railroad reserves the right to cross the Crossing Area with such railroad tracks as may be required for its convenience or purposes in such manner as not unreasonably to interfere with its use as a public highway. In the event the Railroad shall place tracks upon the Crossing Area,the Political Body shall,at its sole cost and expense,modify the highway to conform with the rail line. c) The right hereby granted is subject to any existing encumbrances and rights(whether public or private),recorded or not,and also to any renewals thereof. The Political Body shall not damage,destroy or interfere with the property or rights of nonparties in, upon or relating to the railroad property,unless the Political Body at its own expense settles with and obtains releases from such nonparties. d)Th e Railroad reserves the right to use and to grant to others the right to use the Crossing Area for any purpose not inconsistent with the right hereby granted,including,but not by way of limitation,the right to construct,reconstruct,maintain,operate,repair, alter,renew and replace tracks,facilities and appurtenances on the property;also the right to cross the Crossing Area with all ki of equipment. The Railroad further reserves the right to attach signal,communication or power lines to any highway facilities local upon the property,provided that such attachments shall comply with Political Body's specifications and will not interfere with th use of the Crossing Area. e) So far as it lawfully may do so,the Political Body will assume,bear and pay all taxes and assessments of whatsoever nature or kind(whether general,local or special)levied or assessed upon or against the Crossing Area,excepting taxes levied upon and against the property as a component part of the Railroad's operating property. f) If any property or rights other than the right hereby granted are necessary for the construction, maintenance and use of the highway and its appurtenances,or for the performance of any work in connection with the Project,the Political Body will acquire all such other property and rights at its own expense and without expense to the Railroad. SECTION 2- CONSTRUCTION OF HIGHWAY a) The Political Body,at its own expense,will apply for and obtain all public authority required bylaw,ordinance,rule or regulation for the Project,and will furnish the Railroad upon request with satisfactory evidence that such authority has been obtained. b) Except as may be otherwise specifically provided herein,the Political Body,at its own expense,will furnish all necessary labor, material and equipment, and shall construct and complete the highway and all appurtenances thereof. The appurtenances shall include,without limitation, all necessary and proper highway warning devices (except those installed by the Railroad within its right-of-way),and all necessary and proper drainage facilities,guard rails or barriers,and right of way fences between the highway and the railroad tracks. Upon completion of the Project,the Political Body shall remove from the Railroad's property all temporary structures and false work,and will leave the Crossing Area in a condition satisfactory to the Railroad. c) The Railroad will receive no ascertainable benefit from the construction of the Project,and,except as maybe specifically provided herein,shall not be required to pay or contribute any part of the cost thereof. If the Project is to be financed in whole or in part by Federal funds,all construction work by the Political Body shall be performed,and any reimbursement to the Railroad for work it performs shall be made,in accordance with the applicable Federal acts,regulations,and this Agreement. d)All construction work of the Political Body upon the Railroad's property(including, but not limited to, construction of tle highway and all appurtenances and all related and incidental work)shall be performed and completed in a manner satisfactory to the Vice President-Engineering Services of the Railroad or his authorized representative and in accordance with detailed plans and specifications prepared by and at the expense of the Political Body, and approved in writing by the Railroad's Vice President- Engineering Services. phx.exb Page 1 E ti ti;�n G:\1awadm\par\forms\0589n.exb 037 PHC 880301 Standard Form Approved,AVP-Law e) All construction work of the Political Body shall be performed diligently and completed within a reasonable time,and in any event within three(3)years from the effective date of this Agreement,or within such further period of time as may be specified in writing by the Railroad's Vice President-Engineering Services. No part of the Project shall be suspended,discontinued or unduly delayed without the Railroad's written consent,and subject to such reasonable conditions as the Railroad may specify. It is understood that the Railroad's tracks at and in the vicinity of the work will be in constant or frequent use during progress of the work and that movement or stoppage of trains, engines or cars may cause delays in the work of the Political Body. The Political Body hereby assumes the risk of any such delays and agrees that no claims for damage on account of any delay shall be made against the Railroad. f) If the Project includes construction of a structure over which trains are to be operated, or for which the Railroad has any responsibility for maintenance,the Political Body shall furnish the Railroad permanent reproducible prints of all design and shop drawings as soon as possible after approval by the Vice President-Engineering Services of the Railroad or his authorized representative. Upon completion of construction,the Political Body shall furnish the Railroad two sets of"as constructed"prints and, in addition,upon request of the Vice President-Engineering Services of the Railroad,"as constructed"permanent reproducible prints of all or any portion of the structure. SECTION 3- INJURY AND DAMAGE TO PROPERTY If the Political Body,in the performance of any work contemplated by this Agreement or by the failure to do or perform anything for which the Political Body is responsible under the provisions of this Agreement,shall injure,damage or destroy any property of the Railroad or of any other person lawfully occupying or using the property of the Railroad, such property shall be replaced or repaired by the Political Body at the Political Body's own expense,or by the Railroad at the expense of the Political Body,and to the satisfaction of the Railroad's Vice President-Engineering Services. SECTION 4- PAYMENT FOR WORK BY THE RAILROAD COMPANY a) Bills for work and materials shall be paid by the Political Body promptly upon receipt thereof.The Railroad will submit to the Political Body current bills for flagging and other protective services and devices during progress of the Project. The Railroad will submit final billing for flagging and other protective services within one hundred and twenty (12o) days after completion of the Project,provided the Political Body advises the Railroad of the commencement of the 120-day period by giving the Railroad written otification of completion of the Project. b) The Railroad may contract for the performance of any of its work by other than railroad forces.The Railroad shall notify the Political Body of the contract price within ninety(go)days after it is awarded.Unless the Railroad's work is to be performed on a fixed price basis,the Political Body shall reimburse the Railroad for the amount of the contract. SECTION 5- MAINTENANCE a) If the Project involves a grade crossing: 1) The Political Body shall, at its own sole expense, maintain, repair, and renew, or cause to be maintained, repaired and renewed,the entire Crossing Area, except the portions between the track tie ends, which shall be maintained by and at the expense of the Railroad. 2) If,in the future,the Political Body elects to have the surfacing material between the track tie ends,or between tracks if there is more than one railroad track across the Crossing Area,replaced with paving or some surfacing material other than timber planking,the Railroad,at the Political Body's expense,shall install such replacement surfacing,and in the future,to the extent repair or replacement of the surfacing is necessitated by repair or rehabilitation of the Railroad's tracks through the Crossing Area,the Political Body shall bear the expense of such repairs or replacement. b) If the Project involves a public highway crossing under the Railroad's tracks: 1) The Political Body shall, at its own sole expense, maintain, repair, and renew, or cause to be maintained, repaired and renewed,the entire substructure of the highway-railroad grade separation structure. 2) The Railroad shall,at its own sole expense, maintain and repair, or cause to be maintained and repaired, the entire superstructure of the highway-railroad grade separation structure. If the Project involves a public highway crossing over the Railroad's tracks,the Political Body shall, at its own sole expense, maintain, repair, and renew, or cause to be maintained, repaired, and renewed, the entire highway-railroad grade separation structure. phx.exb Page 2 F-wtiv G:\1awadm\par\fbrms\0589n.exb 038 , PHC 880301 Standard Form Approved,AVP-Law SECTION 6- CHANGES IN GRADE If at any time the Railroad shall elect,or be required by competent authority to,raise or lower the grade of all or any portion the track or tracks located on the Crossing Area,the Political Body shall, at its own expense, conform the public highway in the Crossing Area to conform with the change of grade of the trackage. SECTION 7- REARRANGEMENT OF WARNING DEVICES If the change or rearrangement of any warning device installed hereunder is necessitated for public or Railroad convenience or on account of improvements for either railroad,highway or both,the parties will apportion the expense incidental thereto between themselves by negotiation,agreement or by the order of a competent authority before the change or rearrangement is undertaken. SECTION 8- SAFETY MEASURES:PROTECTION OF RAILROAD COMPANY OPERATIONS It is understood and recognized that safety and continuity of the Railroad's operations and communications are of the utmost importance;and in order that the same may be adequately safeguarded,protected and assured,and in order that accidents may be prevented and avoided,it is agreed with respect to all of said work of the Political Body that the work will be performed in a safe manner and in conformity with the following standards: a) Definitions. All references in this Agreement to the Political Body shall include the Political Body's contractors,subcontractors, officers,agents and employees,and others acting under its or their authority;and all references in this Agreement to work of the Political Body shall include work both within and outside of railroad property. b) Compliance With Laws. The Political Body shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations and enactments affecting the work. The Political Body shall use only such methods as are consistent with safety,both as concerns the Political Body,the Political Body's agents and employees,the officers,agents,employees and property of the Railroad and the public in general. The Political Body(without limiting the generality of the foregoing)shall comply with all applicable state and federal occupational safety and health acts and regulations. All Federal Railroad Administration regulations shall be followed when work is performed on the Railroad's premises. If any failure by the Political Body to comply with any such laws, regulations, and enactments,shall result in any fine,penalty,cost or charge being assessed,imposed or charged against the Railroad,the Political Bo shall reimburse and indemnify the Railroad for any such fine,penalty,cost,or charge,including without limitation attorney's feAD court costs and expenses. The Political Body further agrees in the event of any such action,upon notice thereof being provided by the Railroad,to defend such action free of cost,charge,or expense to the Railroad. c) No Interference or Delays. The Political Body shall not do,suffer or permit anything which will or may obstruct, endanger, interfere with,hinder or delay maintenance or operation of the Railroad's tracks or facilities,or any communication or signal lines, installations or any appurtenances thereof,or the operations of others lawfully occupying or using the Railroad's property or facilities. d)Supervision . The Political Body, at its own expense, shall adequately police and supervise all work to be performed by the Political Body,and shall not inflict injury to persons or damage to property for the safety of whom or of which the Railroad may be responsible, or to property of the Railroad. The responsibility of the Political Body for safe conduct and adequate policing and supervision of the Project shall not be lessened or otherwise affected by the Railroad's approval of plans and specifications,or by the Railroad's collaboration in performance of any work,or by the presence at the work site of the Railroad's representatives, or by compliance by the Political Body with any requests or recommendations made by such representatives. If a representative of the Railroad is assigned to the Project,the Political Body will give due consideration to suggestions and recommendations made by such representative for the safety and protection of the Railroad's property and operations. e) Suspension of Work. If at any time the Political Body's engineers or the Vice President-Engineering Services of the Railroad or their respective representatives shall be of the opinion that any work of the Political Body is being or is about to be done or prosecuted without due regard and precaution for safety and security,the Political Body shall immediately suspend the work until suitable, adequate and proper protective measures are adopted and provided. f) Removal of Debris. The Political Body shall not cause,suffer or permit material or debris to be deposited or cast upon,or to slide or fall upon any property or facilities of the Railroad;and any such material and debris shall be promptly removed from the Railroad's property by the Political Body at the Political Body's own expense or by the Railroad at the expense of the Political Body. The Political Body shall not cause,suffer or permit any snow to be plowed or cast upon the Railroad's property during snow removal from the Crossing Area. g) E2Mlosives. The Political Body shall not discharge any explosives on or in the vicinity of the Railroad's property without the prig consent of the Railroad's Vice President-Engineering Services,which shall not be given if,in the sole discretion of the Railroad's Vice President-Engineering Services,such discharge would be dangerous or would interfere with the Railroad's property or facilities. For the purposes hereof,the"vicinity of the Railroad's property"shall be deemed to be any place on the Railroad's property or in such phx.exb Page 3 V V a Fvhihit13 G:\1awadm\par\tbrms\0589n.exb PHC 880301 Standard Form Approved,AVP-Law close proximity to the Railroad's property that the discharge of explosives could cause injury to the Railroad's employees or other W." ersons,or cause damage to or interference with the facilities or operations on the Railroad's property. The Railroad reserves the ght to impose such conditions,restrictions or limitations on the transportation,handling,storage,security and use of explosives s the Railroad,in the Railroad's sole discretion,may deem to be necessary,desirable or appropriate. In addition to any conditions, restrictions or limitations as may be specifically imposed: 1) Unless the Railroad's Vice President-Engineering Services agrees otherwise,the Political Body shall provide no less than 48 hours'notice,excluding weekends and holidays,before discharging any explosives. 2) Any explosives loaded in holes or placed or otherwise readied for discharge on a day shall be discharged on the same day during daylight hours,and at mutually acceptable times. 3) The Political Body,at its own expense,shall take all precautionary measures and construct all temporary shelters necessary to guard against danger of damage, destruction or interference arising out of or connected with any blasting or any transportation,handling,storage,security or use of explosives. 4)The Political Body shall require explosives to be transported,handled,stored or otherwise secured and used in a manner satisfactory to the Railroad and in accordance with local, state and Federal laws, rules and regulations, including, without limitation,United States Department of Labor,Bureau of Labor Standards,Safety and Health Regulations for Construction,29 CFR Part 1518, Subpart U-- "Blasting and the Use of Explosives"; and Occupational Safety and Health Administration Occupational Safety and Health Standards,29 CFR Part 1910,Subpart H--"Hazardous Materials". h) Obstructions to View. Except as otherwise specifically provided herein,the Political Body shall not cause or permit the view along the tracks of the Railroad to be obstructed,nor place any combustible material on the premises,nor erect any structures thereon. If public law or regulation requires control or removal of weeds or vegetation on each side of the Crossing Area,the Political Body will perform such control or removal work without expense to the Railroad or,if the Political Body may not lawfully perform the control or removal work,reimburse the Railroad for the cost of performing such control or removal. If the crossing is not equipped with automatic train activated warning devices with gate arms: 1) The Political Body shall control or remove weeds and vegetation within and on each side of the Crossing Area so that the view of approaching motorists to approaching trains is not obstructed by weeds or vegetation;and 2) Insofar as it may lawfully may do so,the Political Body will not permit non-parties to construct sight obstructing buildings or other permanent structures on property adjacent to the right-of-way. i) Excavation. The Political Body shall not excavate from existing slopes nor construct new slopes which are excessive and may create hazards of slides or falling rock, or impair or endanger the clearance between existing or new slopes and the tracks of the Railroad. The Political Body shall not do or cause to be done any work which will or may disturb the stability of any area or adversely affect the Railroad's tracks or facilities. The Political Body, at its own expense, shall install and maintain adequate shoring and cribbing for all excavation and/or trenching performed by the Political Body in connection with construction,maintenance or other work. The shoring and cribbing shall be constructed and maintained with materials and in a manner approved by the Railroad's Vice President-Engineering Services to withstand all stresses likely to be encountered,including any stresses resulting from vibrations caused by the Railroad's operations in the vicinity. j) Drainage. The Political Body,at the Political Body's own expense,shall provide and maintain suitable facilities for draining the highway and its appurtenances, and shall not suffer or permit drainage water therefrom to flow or collect upon property of the Railroad. The Political Body,at the Political Body's own expense,shall provide adequate passageway for the waters of any streams, bodies of water and drainage facilities (either natural or artificial, and including water from the Railroad's culvert and drainage facilities),so that said waters may not,because of any facilities or work of the Political Body,be impeded,obstructed,diverted or caused to back up,overflow or damage the property of the Railroad or any part thereof,or property of others.The Political Body shall not obstruct or interfere with existing ditches or drainage facilities. k) Notice. Before commencing any work,the Political Body shall provide 48 hours prior notice(excluding weekends and holidays) to the Railroad's Manager-Track Maintenance. 1) Fiber Optic Cables. Fiber optic cable systems may be buried on the Railroad's property. Protection of the fiber optic cable systems is of extreme importance since any break could disrupt service to users resulting in business interruption and loss of revenue end profits. Political Body shall telephone the Railroad at 1-800-336-9193(a 24-hour number)to determine if fiber optic cable is uried anywhere on the Railroad's premises to be used by the Political Body. If it is, Political Body will telephone the telecommunications company(ies)involved,arrange for a cable locator,and make arrangements for relocation or other protection of the fiber optic cable prior to beginning any work on the Railroad's premises. phx.exb Page 4 0 9 0 G:\1awadm\par\forms\05 89n.exb PHC 880301 Standard Form Approved,AVP-Law SECTION 9- INTERIM WARNING DEVICES If at anytime it is determined by a competent authority,by the Political Body,or by agreement between the parties,that ne improved train activated warning devices should be installed at the Crossing Area,the Political Body shall install adequate tempoW10 rary warning devices or signs and impose appropriate vehicular control measures to protect the motoring public until the new or improved devices have been installed. SECTION io- OTHER RAILROADS All protective and indemnifying provisions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of the Railroad and any other railroad company lawfully using the Railroad's property or facilities. SECTION 11- REMEDIES FOR BREACH OR NONUSE a) If the Political Body shall fail,refuse or neglect to perform and abide by the terms of this Agreement,the Railroad,in addition to any other rights and remedies,may perform any work which in the judgment of the Railroad is necessary to place the highway and appurtenances in such condition as will not menace,endanger or interfere with the Railroad's facilities or operations or jeopardize the Railroad's employees;and the Political Body will reimburse the Railroad for the expenses thereof. b) Nonuse by the Political Body of the Crossing Area for public roadway purposes continuing at any time for a period of eighteen (18)months shall,at the option of the Railroad,work a termination of this Agreement and of all rights of the Political Body hereunder. c) The Political Body will surrender peaceable possession of the Crossing Area upon termination of this Agreement. Termination of this Agreement shall not affect any rights,obligations or liabilities of the parties,accrued or otherwise,which may have arisen prior to termination. SECTION 12- MODIFICATION-ENTIRE AGREEMENT No waiver,modification or amendment of this agreement shall be of any force or effect unless made in writing,signed by the Political Body and the Railroad and specifying with particularity the nature and extent of such waiver,modification or amendme Any waiver by the Railroad of any default by the Political Body shall not affect or impair any right arising from any subseque* default. This Agreement and Exhibits attached hereto and made a part hereof constitute the entire understanding between the Political Body and the Railroad and cancel and supersede any prior negotiations,understandings or agreements,whether written or oral,with respect to the work or any part thereof. SECTION 13- ASSIGNMENT:SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS This Agreement shall not be assigned without the written consent of the Railroad. Subject hereto,this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. pbx.exb Page 5 r�, G:\1awadm\par\forms\0589n.exb v PHUPHE INS 920624 Standard Form Approved,AVP-Law EXHIBIT B-:t Public Road Insurance Requirements The Political Body and/or its Contractor/Subcontractor shall,at its own and/or its Contractor's/Subcontractor's sole cost and expense, procure the following kinds of insurance and promptly pay when due all premiums for that insurance. The Railroad Protective Insurance described in Paragraph D below only needs to be obtained and kept in force during the duration of construction or major reconstruction of the highway located on the Premises.The other insurance coverage described in Paragraphs A,B and C below shall be kept in force by the Political Body during the life of this Agreement. A. General Public Liability insurance providing bodily injury,including death,personal injury and property damage coverage with a combined single limit of at least$2,000,00o each occurrence or claim and a general aggregate limit of at least$4,000,000. This insurance shall provide Broad Form Contractual Liability covering the indemnity provisions contained in this Agreement, Underground Hazard,Broad Form Property Damage,a waiver of governmental immunity(ISO Form GL 24 14 or equivalent), severability of interests and name Railroad as an additional insured with respect to all liabilities arising out of Political Body's obligation to Railroad in the Agreement. If coverage is purchased on a"claims made"basis it shall provide for at least a three (3)year extended reporting or discovery period, which shall be invoked should insurance covering the time period of this Agreement be cancelled. B. Automobile Public Liability insurance providing bodily injury and property damage with a combined single limit of at least $2,000,00o each occurrence or claim. This insurance shall provide contractual liability by endorsement ISO Form CA 00 25 or equivalent covering all motor vehicles including hired and non-owned,mobile equipment to the extent it may be excluded from general liability insurance,severability of interests and name Railroad as an additional insured with respect to all liabilities arising out of Political Body's obligation to Railroad in the Agreement. C. Worker's Compensation insurance covering the statutory liability as determined by the compensation laws of the state(s)affected by this Agreement and Employers'Liability with a limit of at least$1,000,000. Also compliance with all laws of states which require participation in their state workers'compensation fund. D. Railroad Protective Liability insurance naming Railroad as insured with a combined single limit of$2,000,00o per occurrence with a $6,000,00o aggregate. The policy form shall be AAR-AASHTO with broad form coverage for "Physical Damage to Property" (ISO Form GL 00 30) or as revised ISO-RIMA (Form CG 00 35) and include pollution arising out of fuels and lubricants brought to the job site(ISO Form CG 2831 or equivalent). If the Lloyd's London policy form is used,limits shall be $3,000,000 per occurrence with a$9,000,00o aggregate and the Extended Claims Made Date shall be determined by adding the length of the original policy period plus one year to the policy expiration date. The Political Body and/or its Contractor(s)/Subcontractor(s) hereby waive their right of subrogation, as respects the above insurance policy(ies), against Railroad for payments made to or on behalf of employees of Political Body or its agents or its Contractor(s)/Subcontractor(s)and for loss of their owned or leased property or property under their care,custody and control while on or near Railroads right-of-way or other real property. Political Body's and/or its Contractor's/Subcontractor's insurance shall be primary with respect to any insurance carried by Railroad. Political Body and/or its Contractor(s)/Subcontractor(s) shall furnish to Railroad certificates) of insurance evidencing the required coverage and endorsement(s) and upon request a certified duplicate original of any of those policies. The insurance company(ies)issuing such pohcy(ies)shall notify Railroad in writing of any material alteration including any change in the retroactive date in any"claims-made"policies or substantial reduction of aggregate limits,if such limits apply,or cancellation thereof at least thirty(30)days prior thereto. The insurance policy(ies) shall be written by a reputable insurance company or companies acceptable to Railroad or with a current Best's Insurance Guide Rating of B and Class VII or better.Such insurance company shall be authorized to transact business in the state(s)affected by this Agreement. phxexbl.exb 092 Pave I Exhibi._ , ROE 920316 Folder No.: 1967-72 Standard Form Approved,AVP-Law CONTRACTOR'S RIGHT OF ENTRY AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the day of __,200 _ by and between UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation to be addressed at 1416 Dodge Street, WP001,Omaha,Nebraska 68179(hereinafter the"Railroad"), and a(n) (hereinafter the "Political Body•s Contractor"). RECITALS: By agreement dated , the Railroad granted (the) City of Atascadero (hereinafter "Licensee")the right to relocate and widen the existing Chico Road at-grade public road crossing on the property of the Railroad at Milepost 221.77, on the Coast Subdivision,at or near Atascadero, San Luis Obispo County,California. The Political Body•s Contractor has been employed by the Licensee to relocate and widen the existing Chico Road at-grade public road crossing(hereinafter referred to as the"work")and has requested the Railroad to permit it to perform the work on Railroad property,to which the Railroad is agreeable,subject to the following terms and conditions. AGREEMENT: IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE 1 - DEFINITION OF CONTRACTOR For purposes of this agreement, all references in this agreement to the Political Body•s Contractor shall include the Political Body•s Contractor•s contractors, subcontractors, officers, agents and employees, and others acting under its or their authority. ARTICLE 2- RIGHT GRANTED; PURPOSE The Railroad hereby grants to the Political Body•s Contractor the right,during the term hereinafter stated and upon and subject to each and all of the terms,provisions and conditions herein contained,to enter upon and have ingress to and egress from the portion of the Railroad's property at Mile Post 221.77 on the Railroad's Coast Subdivision at or near Atascadero, California, for the purpose of relocating and widening the existing Chico Road at-grade public road crossing. The right herein granted to Political Body•s Contractor is limited to those portions of the Railroad's property specifically described herein,or designated by the Railroad representative named in Article 4. ARTICLE 3 - TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN EXHIBITS B AND B-1 The terms and conditions contained in Exhibits B and B-1, hereto attached, are hereby made a part of this agreement. ARTICLE 4- ALL EXPENSES TO BE BORNE BY CONTRACTOR; RAILROAD REPRESENTATIVE The Political Body•s Contractor shall bear any and all costs and expenses associated with any work performed by the Political Body•s Contractor,or any costs or expenses incurred by the Railroad relating to this agreement. All work performed by Political Body•s Contractor on Railroad's property shall be performed in a manner satisfactory to the respective local Superintendent of Transportation Services of the Railroad or his authorized representative (hereinafter the Railroad Representative). 093 CROE Public Road Crossings Page I of 3 July 16,2001 ROE 920316 Folder No.: 1967-72 Standard Form Approved,AVP-Law ARTICLE 5- TERM; TERMINATION a). The grant of right herein made to Political Body•s Contractor shall commence on , and continue until ,unless sooner terminated as herein provided, or at such time as Political Body•s Contractor has completed its work on Railroad's property,whichever is earlier. Political Body•s Contractor agrees to notify the Railroad Representative in writing when it has completed its work on Railroad property. b). This agreement may be terminated by either party on ten(10)days written notice to the other party. ARTICLE 6- CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE a). Before commencing any work,the Political Body•s Contractor will provide the Railroad with a Certificate issued by its insurance carrier providing the insurance coverage required pursuant to Exhibit B-1 of this agreement in a policy which contains the following type of endorsement: Union Pacific Railroad Company is named as additional insured with respect to all liabilities arising out of Insured's, as Political Body•s Contractor, performance of any work on the property of the Railroad. b). Political Body 0 s Contractor warrants that this agreement has been thoroughly reviewed by its insurance agent(s)/broker(s)and that said agent(s)/broker(s)has been instructed to procure insurance coverage and an endorsement as required herein. c). All insurance correspondence shall be directed to: Union Pacific Railroad Company Real Estate Department 1416 Dodge Street, WP001 Omaha,Nebraska 68179-1100 Folder No. 1967-72 ARTICLE 7 - PROTECTION OF FIBER OPTIC CABLE SYSTEMS Fiber optic cable systems may be buried on Railroad's property. Protection of the fiber optic cable systems is of extreme importance since any break could disrupt service to users resulting in business interruption and loss of revenue and profits. Prior to beginning any work,the Political Body•s Contractor shall telephone the Railroad at 1-800-336- 9193 (a 24-hour number)to determine if fiber optic cable is buried anywhere on the property set forth herein. If it is, the Political Body•s Contractor shall also comply with and be subject to the provisions contained in Section 6 of Exhibit A. ARTICLE 8- ENFORCEABILITY; CHOICE OF LAW; CHOICE OF FORUM Litigation arising out of or connected with this agreement may be instituted and maintained in the courts of the states of Nebraska and California, and the parties consent to jurisdiction over their person and over the subject matter of any such litigation, in those courts,and consent to service of process issued by such courts. ARTICLE 9- ADMINISTRATIVE FEE Applicant shall pay to the Railroad FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS($500.00)as reimbursement for clerical, administrative and handling expense in connection with the processing of this Agreement. ARTICLE 10- CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE 9 2782(A) The parties agree that this Agreement is not,and is not intended to be,a construction contract for purposes of California Civil Code $ 2782(a). Accordingly,to the maximum extent permitted by law,the provisions of California 994 CROE Public Road Crossings Page 2 of 3 July 16,2001 ROE 920316 Folder No.: 1967-72 Standard Form Approved,AVP-Law Civil Code § 2782(a), as interpreted by the California courts in Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Sandyland Protective Association,224 Cal. App.3d 1494,274 Cal.Rptr.626(1990),and in other past and future cases,shall not apply to this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this agreement in duplicate as the date first herein written. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY By MANAGER-CONTRACTS WITNESS: (Name of Contractor) By Title: CROE Public Road Crossings Page 3 of 3 July 16,2001 095 July 16,2001 Folder No. 1967-72 To the Contractor: Before Union Pacific Railroad can permit you to perform work on its property for the relocation and widening of the existing Chico Road at-grade public road crossing, it will be necessary to complete two originals of the enclosed Right of Entry Agreement as follows: 1. Fill in the complete legal name of the contractor in the space provided on Page 1 of the Contractor's Right of Entry Agreement. If a corporation, give the state of incorporation. If a partnership,give the names of all partners. 2. Fill in the date construction will begin and be completed in Article 5, Paragraph A. 3. Fill in the name of the contractor in the space provided in the signature block at the end of the Contractor's Right of Entry Agreement. If the contractor is a corporation,the person signing on its behalf must be an elected corporate officer. 4. Return all copies of the Contractor's Right of Entry Agreement together with your Certificate of Insurance as required in Exhibit B-1, in the attached,self-addressed envelope. 5. Check made payable to the Union Pacific Railroad Company in the amount of$500.00. If you require formal billing, you may consider this letter as a formal bill. In compliance with the Internal Revenue Services' new policy regarding their Form 1099, I certify that 13-6400825 is the Railroad Company's correct Federal Taxpayer Identification Number and that Union Pacific Railroad Company is doing business as a corporation. After approval of the Right of Entry Agreement and insurance certificate,one fully executed counterpart of the agreement will be returned to you. In no event should you begin work until you have received your counterpart of the fully executed agreement. Under Exhibit B-1 of the enclosed Contractor's Right of Entry,you are required to procure Railroad Protective Liability Insurance(RPLI)for the duration of this project. As a service to you, Union Pacific is making this coverage available to you at the rate specified on the attached Insurance Application Form. You are not required to purchase this coverage from the Railroad and are encouraged to shop the market for the best available rate. If you decide;however,that acquiring this coverage from the Railroad is of benefit to you,simply complete the form and follow the instructions at the bottom. If you have any questions concerning the agreement,please contact meat(402)271-3620. Have a safe day! Sincerely, PAUL G. FARRELL MANAGER CONTRACTS 096 ROE 920316 Standard Form Approved,AVP-Law EXHIBIT B SECTION 1- NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT OF WORK-FLAGGING The Political Body's Contractor(s)agrees to notify the Railroad Representative at least 48 hours in advance of Political Body's Contractor(s)commencing its work and at least 24 hours in advance of proposed performance of any work by the Political Body's Contractor(s)in which any person or equipment will be within 25 feet of any track,or will be near enough to any track that any equipment extension(such as,but not limited to,a crane boom)will reach to within 25 feet of any track. Upon receipt of such notice, the Railroad Representative will determine and inform the Political Body's Contractor(s)whether a flagman need be present and whether the Political Body's Contractor(s)need implement any special protective or safety measures. If any flagmen or other special protective or safety measures are performed by the Railroad,such services will be provided at Political Body's Contractor(s)'s expense with the understanding that if the Railroad provides any flagging or other services the Political Body's Contractor(s)shall not be relieved of any of its responsibilities or liabilities set forth herein. SECTION 2- LIMITATION AND SUBORDINATION OF RIGHTS GRANTED a). The foregoing grant of right is subject and subordinate to the prior and continuing right and obligation of the Railroad to use and maintain its entire property including the right and power of the Railroad to construct,maintain,repair,renew,use,operate, change,modify or relocate railroad tracks,roadways,signal,communication,fiber optics,or other wirelines,pipelines and other facilities upon,along or across any or all parts of its property,all or any of which may be freely done at any time or times by the Railroad without liability to the Political Body's Contractor(s)or to any other party for compensation or damages. b). The foregoing grant is also subject to all outstanding superior rights(including those in favor of licensees and lessees of the Railroad's property,and others)and the right of the Railroad to renew and extend the same,and is made without covenant of title or for quiet enjoyment. SECTION 3- NO INTERFERENCE WITH RAILROAD'S OPERATION No work performed by Political Body's Contractor(s) shall cause any interference with the constant, continuous an 0, uninterrupted use of the tracks,property and facilities of the Railroad its lessees,licensees or others,unless specifically permitted under this agreement,or specifically authorized in advance by the Railroad Representative. Nothing shall be done or suffered to be done by the Political Body's Contractor(s)at any time that would in any manner impair the safety thereof. When not in use,Political Body's Contractor(s)'s machinery and materials shall be kept at least 50 feet from the centerline of Railroad's nearest track,and there shall be no crossings of Railroad's tracks except at existing open public crossings. SECTION 4- PERMITS Prior to beginning any work,the Political Body's Contractor(s),at its sole expense, shall obtain all necessary permits to perform any work contemplated by this agreement. SECTION 5- MECHANIC'S LIENS The Political Body's Contractor(s)shall pay in full all persons who perform labor or provide materials for the work to be performed by Political Body's Contractor(s). The Political Body's Contractor(s) shall not permit or suffer any mechanic's or materialmen's liens of any kind or nature to be enforced against any property of the Railroad for any such work performed. The Political Body's Contractor(s)shall indemnify and hold harmless the Railroad from and against any and all liens,claims,demands, costs or expenses of whatsoever nature in any way connected with or growing out of such work done,labor performed,or materials furnished. SECTION 6- FIBER OPTIC CABLE SYSTEMS In addition to the liability terms elsewhere in this Agreement,the Political Body's Contractor(s)shall indemnify and hold the Railroad harmless against and from all cost,liability and expense whatsoever(including,without limitation,attorney's fees and court costs and expenses)arising out of or in any way contributed to by any act or omission of the Political Body's Contractor(s),its subcontractor,agents and/or employees,that causes or contributes to 0)any damage to or destruction of any telecommunications system on Railroad's property,and(2)any injury to or death of any person employed by or on behalf of any telecommunicatio company,and/or its contractor,agents and/or employees,on Railroad's property. Political Body's Contractor(s)shall not have*0 seek recourse against Railroad for any claim or cause of action for alleged loss of profits or revenue or loss of service or other consequential damage to a telecommunication company using Railroad's property or a customer or user of services of the fiber optic cable on Railroad's property. 097 0703n Page 1 Rev.5/23/94 ROE 920316 Standard Form Approved,AVP-Law SECTION 7- COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS In the prosecution of the work covered by this agreement,the Political Body's Contractor(s)shall comply with all applicable *federal,state and local laws,regulations and enactments affecting the work.The Political Body's Contractor(s)shall use only such methods as are consistent with safety,both as concerns the Political Body's Contractor(s),the Political Body's Contractor(s)'s agents and employees, the officers, agents, employees and property of the Railroad and the public in general. The Political Body's Contractor(s)(without limiting the generality of the foregoing)shall comply with all applicable state and federal occupational safety and health acts and regulations. All Federal Railroad Administration regulations shall be followed when work is performed on the Railroad's property. If any failure by the Political Body's Contractor(s)to comply with any such laws,regulations,and enactments, shall result in any fine, penalty, cost or charge being assessed, imposed or charged against the Railroad, the Political Body's Contractor(s)shall reimburse and indemnify the Railroad for any such fine,penalty,cost,or charge,including without limitation attorney's fees,court costs and expenses. The Political Body's Contractor(s)further agrees in the event of any such action,upon notice thereof being provided by the Railroad,to defend such action free of cost,charge,or expense to the Railroad. SECTION 8- SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS Safety of personnel, property, rail operations and the public is of paramount importance in the prosecution of the work pursuant to this agreement. As reinforcement and in furtherance of overall safety measures to be observed by the Political Body's Contractor(s)(and not by way of limitation),the following special safety rules shall be followed: a). The Political Body's Contractor(s)shall keep the.job site free from safety and health hazards and ensure that its employees are competent and adequately trained in all safety and health aspects of the job. The Political Body's Contractor(s)shall have proper first aid supplies available on the job site so that prompt first aid services can be provided to any person that may be injured on the job site. The Political Body's Contractor(s) shall promptly notify the Railroad of any U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration reportable injuries occurring to any person that may arise during the work performed on the job site. The Political Body's Contractor(s)shall have a non-delegable duty to control its employees,while they are on the job site or any other property of the Railroad to be certain they do not use,be under the influence of,or have in their possession any alcoholic beverage or illegally obtained drug,narcotic or other substance that may inhibit the safe performance of work by an employee. ). The employees of the Political Body's Contractor(s)shall be suitably dressed to perform their duties safely and in a manner hat will not interfere with their vision,hearing or free use of their hands or feet. Only waist length shirts with sleeves and trousers that cover the entire leg are to be worn. If flare-legged trousers are worn,the trouser bottoms must be tied to prevent catching. The employees should wear sturdy and protective footwear. Employees shall not wear boots(other than work boots),sandals,canvas-type shoes or other shoes that have thin soles or heels that are higher than normal. In addition,the Political Body's Contractor(s)shall require its employees to wear personal protective equipment as specified by Railroad rules, regulations or Railroad officials overlooking the work at the job site. In particular,the protective equipment to be worn shall be: (i) Protective head gear that meets American National Standard-Z89.1-latest revision. It is suggested that all hard hats be affixed with Political Body's Contractor(s)'s or subcontractor's company logo or name. (2) Eye protection that meets American National Standard for occupational and educational eye and face protection, Z87.1-latest revision. Additional eye protection must be provided to meet specific job situations such as welding,grinding, burning,etc.;and (3) Hearing protection which affords enough attenuation to give protection from noise levels that will be occurring on the job site. C). All heavy equipment provided or leased by the Political Body's Contractor(s)shall be equipped with audible back-up warning devices. If in the opinion of the Railroad Representative any of Political Body's Contractor(s)'s or any of its subcontractor's equipment is unsafe for use on the Railroad's right-of-way,the Political Body's Contractor(s),at the request of the Railroad Representative,shall remove such equipment from the Railroad's right-of-way. SECTION 9- INDEMNITY a). As used in this Section,"Railroad"includes other railroad companies using the Railroad's property at or near the location of the Political Body's Contractor(s)'s installation and their officers,agents,and employees; "Loss"includes loss,damage,claims, demands,actions,causes of action,penalties,costs,and expenses of whatsoever nature,including court costs and attorneys'fees, hich may result from: (a)injury to or death of persons whomsoever(including the Railroad's officers,agents,and employees,the olitical Body's Contractor(s)'s officers,agents,and employees,as well as any other person);and(b)damage to or loss or destruction of property whatsoever(including Political Body's Contractor(s)'s property,damage to the roadbed, tracks, equipment, or other property of the Railroad,or property in its care or custody). b). As a major inducement and in consideration of the license and permission herein granted,the Political Body's Contractor(s) 0703n Page 2 t 098 ROE 920316 Standard Form Approved,AVP-Law agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Railroad from any Loss which is due to or arises from any cause and is associated in whole or in part with the work performed under this agreement,a breach of the agreement or the failure to observe the health and safe provisions herein,or any activity or omission arising out of performance or nonperformance of this agreement;regardless of whetl caused solely or contributed to in part by the negligence or fault of the Railroad. c). Any liability of either party hereunder to one of its employees under any Workers' Compensation Act or the Federal Employers'Liability Act shall not be questioned or in any way challenged by the other party,nor shall any jury or court findings, resulting from any employee's suit against either party pursuant to any such Act(s),be relied upon or used by either party in any attempt to assert common law liability against the other. SECTION lo,- RESTORATION OF PROPERTY In the event the Railroad authorizes the Political Body's Contractor(s)to take down any fence of the Railroad or in any manner move or disturb any of the other property of the Railroad in connection with the work to be performed by Political Body's Contractor(s),then in that event the Political Body's Contractor(s)shall,as soon as possible and at Political Body's Contractor(s)'s sole expense,restore such fence and other property to the same condition as the same were in before such fence was taken down or such other property was moved or disturbed,and the Political Body's Contractor(s)shall indemnify and hold harmless the Railroad, its officers,agents and employees, against and from any and all liability,loss,damages, claims, demands, costs and expenses of whatsoever nature,arising from the taking down of any fence or the moving or disturbance of any other property of the Railroad. SECTION ii- WAIVER OF BREACH The waiver by the Railroad of the breach of any condition,covenant or agreement herein contained to be kept,observed and performed by the Political Body's Contractor(s)shall in no way impair the right of the Railroad to avail itself of any subsequent breach thereof. SECTION 12- ASSIGNMENT-SUBCONTRACTING The Political Body's Contractor(s)shall not assign,sublet or subcontract this agreement,or any interest therein,without the written consent of the Railroad and any attempt to so assign,sublet or subcontract without the written consent of the Railroad sh be void. If the Railroad gives the Political Body's Contractor(s)permission to subcontract all or any portion of the work her described, the Political Body's Contractor(s) is and shall remain responsible for all work of subcontractors and all work o subcontractors shall be governed by the terms of this agreement. 0703n Page 3 Rev.., 099 ROE 920316-INS RR Protective Form Approved,AVP-Law EXHIBIT B-i To Contractor's Right of Entry Agreement Railroad Protective Liability Insurance Requirements Licensee shall,at its own sole cost and expense,procure the following kinds of insurance and promptly pay when due all premiums for that insurance. The following insurance shall be kept in force during the life of this Agreement: 1. General Public Liability insurance providing bodily injury,including death,personal injury and property damage coverage with a combined single limit of at least$2,00o,000 each occurrence or claim and a general aggregate limit of at least$4,000,000. This insurance shall provide Broad Form Contractual Liability covering the indemnity provisions contained in this Agreement,Underground hazard,Products-Completed Operations with products-completed operation aggregate of at least$2,000,000,a separate general aggregate for the project(ISO Form CG 25 03 or equivalent),Broad Form Property Damage,severability of interests and name Railroad as an additional insured with respect to all liabilities arising out of Licensee's obligation to Railroad in the Agreement. If coverage is purchased on a"claims made"basis it shall provide for at least a three (3)year extended reporting or discovery period,which shall be invoked should insurance covering the time period of this Agreement be cancelled. 2. Automobile Public Liability insurance providing bodily injury and property damage with a combined single limit of at least$2,0oo,000 each occurrence or claim. This insurance shall provide contractual liability by endorsement ISO Form CA 00 25 or equivalent covering all motor vehicles including hired and non-owned,mobile equipment to the extent it may be excluded from general liability insurance,severability of interests and name Railroad as an additional insured with respect to all liabilities arising out of Licensee's obligation to Railroad in the Agreement. 3. Worker's Compensation insurance covering the statutory liability as determined by the compensation laws of the state(s)affected by this Agreement and Employers'Liability. Also compliance with all laws of states which require participation in their state workers'compensation fund. 4. Railroad Protective Liability insurance naming Railroad and any railroad operating over its tracks as insured with a combined single limit of$2,000,000 per occurrence with a$6,000,000 aggregate. The policy 0 form shall be AAR-AASHTO with broad form coverage for"Physical Damage to Property"(ISO Form GL 00 30) or as revised ISO-RIMA(Form CG 00 35)and include pollution arising out of fuels and lubricants brought to the job site(ISO Form CG 28 31 or equivalent). If the Lloyd's,London policy form is used,limits shall be $3,000,000 per occurrence with a$9,000,000 aggregate and the Extended Claims Made Date shall be determined by adding the length of the original policy period plus one year to the policy expiration date. The Licensee hereby waives its right to subrogation,as respects the above insurance policy(ies),against Railroad for payments made to or on behalf of employees of Licensee or its agents and for loss of its owned or leased property or property under its care,custody and control while on or near Railroad's right-of-way or other real property. Licensee's insurance shall be primary with respect to any insurance carried by Railroad. Licensee shall furnish to Railroad certificate(s)of insurance evidencing the required coverage and endorsement(s)and upon request a certified duplicate original of any of those policies. The insurance company(ies)issuing such policy(ies)shall notify Railroad in writing of any material alteration including any change in the retroactive date in any"claims-made"policies or substantial reduction of aggregate limits,if such limits apply,or cancellation thereof at least thirty(3o)days prior thereto. The insurance policy(ies)shall be written by a reputable insurance company or companies acceptable to Railroad or with a current Best's Insurance Guide Rating of B and Class VII or better. Such insurance company shall be authorized to transact business in the state(s)affected by this Agreement. 0 100 g:\share\exhibitb\roeinsb.exa Page 1 Exhibit B-1 ROE 920316-INS A-I Form Approved,AVP-Law EXHIBIT B-1 To Contractor's Right of Entry Agreement S Insurance Requirements Licensee shall,at its own sole cost and expense,procure the following kinds of insurance and promptly pay when due all premiums for that insurance. The following insurance shall be kept in force during the life of this Agreement: 1. General Public Liability insurance providing bodily injury,including death,personal injury and property damage coverage with a combined single limit of at least$2,000,000 each occurrence or claim and a general aggregate limit of at least$4,000,000. This insurance shall provide Broad Form Contractual Liability covering the indemnity provisions contained in this Agreement,Underground hazard,Products-Completed Operations with products-completed operation aggregate of at least$2,000,000,a separate general aggregate for the project(ISO Form CG 25 03 or equivalent),Broad Form Property Damage,severability of interests and name Railroad as an additional insured with respect to all liabilities arising out of Licensee's obligation to Railroad in the Agreement. If coverage is purchased on a"claims made"basis it shall provide for at least a three (3)year extended reporting or discovery period,which shall be invoked should insurance covering the time period of this Agreement be cancelled. 2. Automobile Public Liability insurance providing bodily injury and property damage with a combined single limit of at least$2,0oo,000 each occurrence or claim. This insurance shall provide contractual liability by endorsement ISO Form CA 00 25 or equivalent covering all motor vehicles including hired and non-owned,mobile equipment to the extent it may be excluded from general liability insurance,severability of interests and name Railroad as an additional insured with respect to all liabilities arising out of Licensee's obligation to Railroad in the Agreement. 3. Worker's Comyensation insurance covering the statutory liability as determined by the compensation laws of the state(s)affected by this Agreement and Employers'Liability. Also compliance with all laws of states which require participation in their state workers'compensation fund. The Licensee hereby waives its right to subrogation,as respects the above insurance policy(ies),against Railroad for payments made to or on behalf of employees of Licensee or its agents and for loss of its owned or leased property or property under its care,custody and control while on or near Railroad's right-of-way or other real property. Licensee's insurance shall be primary with respect to any insurance carried by Railroad. Licensee shall furnish to Railroad certificate(s)of insurance evidencing the required coverage and endorsement(s)and upon request a certified duplicate original of any of those policies. The insurance company(ies)issuing such policy(ies)shall notify Railroad in writing of any material alteration including any change in the retroactive date in any"claims-made"policies or substantial reduction of aggregate limits,if such limits apply,or cancellation thereof at least thirty(3o)days prior thereto. The insurance policy(ies)shall be written by a reputable insurance company or companies acceptable to Railroad or with a current Best's Insurance Guide Rating of B and Class VII or better. Such insurance company shall be authorized to transact business in the state(s)affected by this Agreement. 101. g:\share\exhibitb\roeinsal.exa Page 1 Exhibit A-1 1:\forms\roeinsa.kio APPLICATION FORM RAILROAD PROTECTIVE LIABILITY INSURANCE ($2,000,000 per occurrence/ $6,000,000 aggregate) 1) Name and address of UPRR Contract Manager: Insurance Assistant Union Pacific Railroad Company 1416 Dodge Street,MC 10049 Omaha,Nebraska 68179 2) UPPR Contract Folder No.: _1967-72_ State Project No.: (if applicable) 3) Description of Operations: _Proposed reconstruction&widening of existing Chico Road public road crossing_ 4) Complete Appropriate Project Information: Pipeline/Wireline Project:(fill in linear footage within Railroad Right-of-Way) a) Traverse Overhead —Feet b) Traverse Underground _Feet c) Longitudinal Underground _Feet d) Longitudinal Overhead _Feet e) Other(description) _ OR Construction Project:(total project cost cannot exceed$5,000,000) a) Subsurface Soil/Sediment Samples b) Hand Held Auger Borings c) Soil Gas Survey Points d) Boring Drilled w/Soil Samples e) Temporary Piezometer Wells t) Temporary Monitoring Wells g) Recovery Wells w/Above Ground Equipment h) Recovery Systems&Above Ground Equipment e) Other Construction Project(Describe Fully) Total Project Cost is: $_6,399.00_ 5) Job Location: _MP 221.77 on the Coast Sub.in Atascadero,San Luis Obispo Co.,CA_ 6) Dates of Work on Railroad Right-of-Way: Start: End: 7) Designated Contractor&Mailing Address: 8) Name&Mailing Address of involved Governmental Authority or other Contracting Party: 9) Cost of Railroad Protective Liability coverage for this project: $_2,000.00_ THIS COVERAGE WILL NOT BEGIN UNTIL THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD REPRESENTATIVE HAS RECEIVED ALL(3)ITEMS SHOWN BELOW: 1) A check(in the name of Union Pacific Railroad Company)for the amount quoted in item#9, 2) a certificate of insurance showing$1,000,000 general liability coverage for your company;and 3) this signed completed form. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: Title: 102 Revised July 21,1998 QUESTIONS? Call Judi Scott (402)271-2215 FAX(402)271-3160 RATE SCHEDULE RAILROAD PROTECTIVE LIABILITY INSURANCE A WIRELINE OR PIPELINE INSTALLATIONS 1 LONGITUDINAL Length (in feet) CONTRACTOR'S COST 0-250 $1,400.00 250 - 500 $1,480.00 501 - 1,000 $1,600.00 1,001 -2,000 $1,760.00 2,001 - 4,000 $2,120.00 4,001 - 6,000 $2,280.00 6,001 - 8,000 $2,440.00 8,001 - 10,000 $2,600.00 Over 10,000 must call Union Pacific for approval 2 TRAVERSE Contractor's cost for all projects is $1,480.00 B CONSTRUCTION NO INCLUDING WIRE AND PIPE INSTALLATION Construction projects include: parking lot construction, station or building repair, maintenance work, weed control - cutting or spraying, seed planting, grass cutting, signal repair, bridge painting, installation of private grade crossings, landscaping, rock scaling, building and demolition; spur and sidetrack construction, maintenance or repair, bridge surface repair, survey work,test borings and bridge inspection. TOTAL PROJECT COST IS: CONTRACTOR'S COST IS: $0 to $1,250,000 $2,000 $1,250,001 to $2,500,000 $3,000 $2,500,000 to $3,500,000 $6,000 $3,500,000 to $5,000,000 $10,000 103 Revised July 21,1998 QUESTIONS? Call Judi Scott (402)271-2215 FAX(402)271-3160 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 n oil I m DATE: 07/24/2001 Isis w 1-97-9 Atascadero City Council Staff Report— Community Development Department General Plan Update Recommendation on Draft Land Use Plan GPA 2000-0001 SUBJECT: GPA 2000-0001 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE: REVIEW OF DRAFT LAND USE PLAN: Consideration of the Planning Commission's recommendation on a Draft Land Use Plan to the City Council for use in the General Plan Update process. The Draft Land Use Plan will be used for the preparation of a Draft General Plan Document and Draft Environmental Impact Report. In addition, the Planning Commission has forwarded 10 separate policy options to be addressed in the Draft General Plan Document. No actions that would amend the current General Plan will be taken. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission Recommends: 1. The City Council adopt the attached draft Resolution, thereby endorsing the Draft Land Use Plan as the Preferred Plan for use in the Draft General Plan policy document and Draft Environmental Impact Report; and, 2. The City Council direct staff to incorporated policy issues 1 through 10 into the Draft General Plan. DISCUSSION: The adoption of the Draft Land Use Plan represents the conclusion of the public outreach process to establish a preferred Land Use Diagram and the beginning of the Draft General Plan document and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) preparation process. The Draft Land Use Plan will be used as the basis for the written Draft General Plan document. The draft document and Draft EIR will be released for public review later this year. Background: A joint study session of the City Council and Planning Commission was held on May 29, 2001 to review a"refined"Draft Land Use Plan for use as the "preferred project" in the General Plan Update and EIR. In addition to the Plan, staff presented ten broad policy issues that need to be addressed in the update process. The purpose of the study session was Print Date:07/18/01 File:072401-GP update.doc ,4 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 to allow staff an opportunity to present the Draft Land Use Plan and policy issues to the City Council, Planning Commission and public prior to the release of staff reports. • Following the study session and a public open house, the Planning Commission held a hearing on June 5, 2001 to consider the Draft Land Use Plan. Due to the quantity of public testimony the item was continued to June 19, 2001. At the second meeting, the Commission forwarded recommendations to the City Council on a Draft Land Use Plan and ten policy options. The following staff report is an expanded discussion of the topics and issues that were presented during the joint study session on May 29, 2001. The Planning Commission's recommendations are reflected in all of the policy options. • f�J ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 Plannin,z Commission Recommended Draft Land Use Plan: The June 19, 2001 Planning Commission Recommended Land Use Alternative includes several changes from the May 29 alternatives. The Commission is recommending the .following changes: 1) change LUA-7 from SFR-Y (1-1%2 ac min.) to SE (Suburban Estates 2'/2-10 ac min.) with a requirement for bikeways and equestrian access to the Salinas River. 2) change LUA-11 (San Benito Area) from SE (Suburban Estates 21/2-10 ac min.) to SFR-Y (1-11/2 ac min.) 3) change one parcel located between Morro Road and Atascadero Avenue from MDR (medium density residential) to O (office) The map has been divided into three separate sub-areas for easy of discussion, the North End, Central Core, and South End. FChangel Planning Commission Recommended Alternative Change 2 City of Atas(adero General Plan Update a June 19, 2001 a Q y y N 71 O n al Change 3 x r i ly ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 North End The North End area consists of the following land use proposals: Del Rio Shopping Center Node,the LUA-7 Railroad Parcel, and the North County Christian School relocation. During public testimony, property owners in the vicinity of San Benito Road expressed differing positions about allowing smaller lot sizes in this area. The Planning Commission is recommending that this area be redesignated to SFR-Y based on the testimony received. LUA 7 Railroad Parcel Change to SE(Suburban Estates)2.5— 10 acre min lot size a•a Bikeway to be constructed on Mackey Property San Benito Road Area Change to SFR-Y 10 cx T x S 7 North County Christian School Relocation Del Rio Shopping Center Node 15 acre shopping center Multi-family and'/�acre single family transition to suburban densities. 107 � 1 ' '� Iii�♦�� Q� rr �'r. ♦ � '(+.♦ ♦ v,7s • J � , �`� ��♦i'� ♦ �''I ,'�'��t��w�� ,► yam♦ ! y�Q � �r fir`•,��/%���;,r►�r ••_' .4tle i �'r� ,. El Camino I Curbaril Center IN— Consolidation of parcels 56, FA into a single commercial PAI project MIA PA"IT, IM �•�' ',err t��♦parr*' �i�ie j. �� �. � �1��i�� ♦♦ ,`��• mix►�+r:rwi O�♦t� ����� . ♦j♦j!� ♦IZ '♦� �i�� Si ♦ �.♦_aI 1���w I ♦� I II ��' ��� ,/�ni2 I r/•lttl*. � ♦�.. �'�♦E,. ���`�� ,�� l�w��wr IIS. \rt "" u�� 1� ����`+': ��,•' W-1191 w. . ♦♦;ami \:�� •, j �I ♦ �r�♦ rI � aril.• ��•••� ••i,;•.•s;.-•.fir }� .�- �iE� � .���. ��' .o�,I1�=►�, /III��. „', �� ♦� srt \� ff` ��, ♦ �,`,,I♦r�I .ham • 1/•� I�y1I 1•�r` \�•�� +♦♦II• 1r* 1♦ p •r ILII •���� '�� ���♦♦I� fHr►.�7r � `r r4��?..�li ate•-•,rri //�i.�♦ � PRIM I'I::a�r�'r✓•����.,� ••I�,�1���,���`, � r� `��♦♦`` 'Awl, -: -- : �`', rd1 .,:•..-,r�I,.OPlanning Commission Change �� li�• 'its �.�•�,'rr�+iia �?:w ••I -f,�,J�,r♦�` �,�� recommendation • change N R from MDR to Office. �NOV. �$%!/i I.` ♦ .ter►-►�, �..�� •'���:•�,�]i �,����,f.I � �,,�,���,,� Morro -._. Corridor CommercialAdditional Retail alongMulti-family transition Navajoa ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 South End Proposed land use changes at the South End include Mixed Uses at Dove Creek,the Woodlands Specific Plan, and expansion of Paloma Creek Park. ° Paloma Creek Park Expansion Df i g� p S�R•Z FM%s 4 m Woodlands Specific Plan Cluster development 269 units Preservation of hillside and oak woodlands CRUD: R•Y Dove Creek Mixed Use Land Use Program Retail,office,theaters,and 200 multi- family units �On ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 Revised General Plan Build-Out Calculations The following table has been updated to include the Planning Commission recommended changes. Using the same assumptions as the current General Plan,theoretical build-out would be 35,238 residents. General Plan Update Population Calculations 19-Jun-01 1994 General Pian Buildout Current General Plan Buildout PC Recommended Alternative 6/21/New Buildout includes approved General Plan Amendments 1994-99 Land Use 1994 acres Units Population net changes 2001 Acres Units Population net changes Units Population Acres Units Population A 43.9 ac 0.0 ac 43.9 ac 0.0 ac 43.9 ac SE/RE 9,926.2 ac 3,862 du's 10,234 pp (270.3)ac 9,655.9 ac 3,757 du's 9,955 pp (303.5)ac -118 du's -313 pp 9,352.4 ac 3,638 du's 9,642 pp SFR-Z 626.4 ac 620 du's 1,643 pp (4.0)ac 622.4 ac 616 du's 1,632 pp 32.8 ac 32 du's 86 pp 655.2 ac 648 du's 1,718 pp SFR-Y 1,320.9 ac 2,316 du's 6,137 pp 138.8 ac 1,459.8 ac 2,559 du's 6,782 pp 92.0 ac 161 du's 428 pp 1,551.8 ac 2,721 du's 7,210 pp SFR-X 373.6 ac 1,034 du's 2,740 pp 34.0 ac 407.6 ac 1,128 du's 2,969 pp 53.2 ac 147 du's 390 pp 460.8 ac 1,275 du's 3,379 pp MDR 203.4 ac 1,046 du's 2,772 pp (6.3)ac 197.2 ac 1,014 du's 2,687 pp 19.9 ac 102 du's 271 pp 217.1 ac 1,116 du's 2,958 pp HDR 214.8 ac 2,877 du's 7,624 pp 30.2 ac 245.0 ac 3,281 du's 8,695 pp 58.0 ac 367 du's 973 pp 303.0 ac 3,648 du's 9,668 pp GC-NC 21.5 ac 0.0 ac 21.5 ac (7.7)ac 13.8 ac GC-0 47.4 ac (1.3)ac 46.1 ac (1.4)ac 44.7 ac GC-R 131.3 ac (3.7)ac 127.6 ac 40.4 ac 168.1 ac CPK 81.6 ac 74.6 ac 156.2 ac (73.2)ac 82.9 ac D 62.3 ac (0.4)ac 61.9 ac 50 du's 133 pp 0.4 ac 62.3 ac 50 du's 133 pp Sc 71.5 ac 0.0 ac 71.5 ac (8.4)ac 63.2 ac GC-TC 37.9 ac 5.1 ac 43.0 ac (3.7)ac 39.3 ac 1 29.5 ac 4.4 ac 33.9 ac 0.0 ac 33.9 ac IPK 31.2 ac 0.0 ac 31.2 ac 0.0 ac 31.2 ac U 66.6 ac 200 du's 530 pp 66.6 ac 200 du's 530 pp EC 6.7 ac 6.7 ac C 679.3 ac 0.0 ac 679.3 ac (177.6)ac 501.7 ac P 1,279.5 ac (1.1)ac 1,278.5 ac (71.8)ac 1,206.7 ac OS 277.4 ac 277.4 ac Total 15,182.6 ac 11,755 du's 31,150 pp 0.0 ac 15,182.6 ac 12,405 du's 32,873 pp 0.0 acl 892 du's 2,365 pp 15,182.7 ac 13,297 of 35,238 pp 1) buildout assumptions do not include the Atascadero State Hospital population(1,210 person 2000 census) 2) all acreage calculations are net acres and do not include streets and right-of-ways 3) population per dwelling unit=2.65 persons Draft Land Use Plan Planning Commission Recommendation: 1. Adopt the 6/19/01 Draft Land Use Plan as the Preferred Plan for use in the preparation of the Draft General Plan document and EIR. The City Council may add, delete or change elements of the map as part of its recommendation. 110 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 General Plan Update Issues: The following policy option issues were presented at the Joint Session meeting and have been reviewed at the Planning Commission Hearing. Policy Options * 1. Urban Service Line * 2. Land Use Designations * 3. Expansion of the PD-7 District * 4. Creek Setbacks * 5. Affordable Housing * 6. Service Commercial Locations * 7. Annexation Areas * 8. Lot Size Inconsistencies * 9. Downtown Parking Standards (added by Planning Commission) * 10. Colony House Protection Standards (added by Planning Commission) Policy Option #1: Urban Service Line * What is the Urban Services Line? * Ambulance * Cultural Facilities * Fire Protection * Improvement Districts * Library * Parks * Police * Solid Waste Disposal * Storm Drainage * Streets * Street Sweeping * Street Trees * Utilities * Water * Sewer * What is the Suburban Services Area? * Ambulance * Creekway&Horse Trails * Fire Protection * Improvement Districts * Parks * Police * Solid Waste Disposal * Streets * Utilities * Water — Sewer services are not provided except for "cease and desist"septic problem areas and where approved by the City Council for public uses • �a�r �►'�'-1 «�yf�''��` `yiCa r �^' Fat �� � 1�^•A 4 wo S-@k Q A OR ,��-• ►\111 I =• �'III�'U � ���"' �rr OIIIIIUIIu� a-'-/'• ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 Policy Option #2: Land Use Designations Planning Commission Recommended Option 1. Recommend incorporation of the following new Land Use Designations in Updated General Plan Erdstng Lard lyes UpcbW land Uses N" Carservdtion PG Va m AG Pgialtue 0. M OpEn 0. Pasidendal RR Fdral Fesdatial RR Faxal F-esidertial SSF Snje Farrily SJxrben(25-10 acre lot nin) RE Feral Estates(25-10 acre Ict rrirn)[alside L&] a SE Sl bt.r m Estates(25-10 acre Ict n irn)[inside USL] 0. UMF LavDaisiy9njeFarrily SFR:Z Snje FaiAyFbdder&I(1.5-25acre lot nin.) 0. IVDSF MBiun Deur Snje Family SFR:Y Snje Family Fbsidatal(1.0 acre Ict rrin) 1. FDSF Hgb Density Srxje Fa-ily SFR-X Sr-de Family Pedda tial(0.5 acre Ict rdrL) 4. LDNF Lav Density MA-Family(10 beet um/ao) IVM Madun Dasity Flesidertial(10 dis/ac) 10. HCIVF Hcji Density Wt-Fainly(16 bec main/ac) FDR Hch Density Fmsidential(22 d!s/ac) 7L Cumudal NC Nagbatuod Carrmrdd Con-Une Wth GC FC Redl Ccrrrrrerdal GC Geral Camudal 16. SC Service Con Terdal SC Service Cam-erdal TC Ta.rist Camrerdd CarrbineWth GC D Dmrtaw D Dowtow 16. O CfFice CorrbineWthGC CPK CarrrErdal Park CPK Camsrrdd Park NC Mx9d Use Ca mencei 16. Irdtstrial Ind&ai IND Irx9 sinal IPK IrxistrialPak CarbineWthlND Pjlic/Chi-Rustic P Rblic Rdlitites IB Rhic Fadliities 0. REr. FbaBEm FEC Rhic PbuisEficn 0. CREC Camaicd Rmee icn 10. ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 Policy Option 43: PD-7 District Expansion * PD-7 is a single-family Planned Development District currently allowed in the Multi- Family Districts. * Has worked successfully for years to allow flexible projects with high design standards * Converts Multi-Family areas to Single-Family * Could be customized to work in the SFR-X designation * Would allow new Single-Family Development options * Protect existing neighborhoods from Multi-Family densities. Planning Commission Recommended Options 1. Recommend that standards for a new PD-7 type overlay district be developed for the SFR-X land use designation in order to allow small lot single family infill development. 2. Recommend that RMF property meeting the following standards be preserved as "prime" multi-family areas for apartment development and preclude conversion to PD-7. a. Lot size: Lots or contiguous ownership of 2+ acres. b. Slope: Below 10% C. Arterial or collector street access d. Neighborhood compatibility with apartment development Policy Option #4: Creek Setbacks * Atascadero has numerous creeks * No setback protections existing * Development encroachment — damages habitat — degrades water quality — increases erosion — alters flood plains — increases property damage Planning Commission Recommended Option 1. Recommend that tiered setback standards for each area be developed to protect blueline creeks with special Downtown Master Plan consideration. 114 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 Policy Option #5: Affordable Housing * Affordable housing is not just"low income" * Median Prices increased from$152,000 to $215,000 last year (+42%) * Balanced housing supports a strong economic base and a healthy community * State of California provides housing allocation requirements to cities * Atascadero's 1994 allocation was 1,400 units (mostly not built) * SB 910 would reduce road funds for non-compliance Affordable Housing Options * 5A Second Units * 5B Mixed Use Multi-Family Residential in Retail District * 5C Multi-Family Density (units vs.bedrooms) * 5D Senior Housing * 5E Inclusionary Housing Program Policy Option #5A: Affordable Housing- Second Units * Guest Houses currently allowed in all Districts * Guest Houses are unregulated and lack only a stove * Second Units have full kitchens and can be attached or detached from primary unit * Staff estimates that an average of 10-15 Guest Houses are built annually in Atascadero. * State Law requires cities to conditionally allow second units in at least one SFR district Planning Commission Recommended Options 1. Develop Second Unit standards that address the following: lot size(I ac min) size restriction 4 sewer connection 4 covered parking 4 maximum slope native trees impacts 4 architectural appearance setbacks neighborhood compatibility i; Conditional Use Permit approval process 2. Begin with a pilot program to allow second units in the SFR-Y (1 - 1.5 acre lot min) land use with annual program report to the Planning Commission. 3. Eliminate Guest Houses in the SFR-Y land uses. 4. Continue to allow Guest Houses in the SFR-X, SFR-Z and SSF land uses. 115 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 Policy Option #513: Affordable Housing-Mixed Use Multi-Family Residential in Retail District * Strip appearance of El Camino Real result of exclusive Commercial zoning * Low demand for antiquated commercial structures * Limited reuse options discourage reinvestment * Mixed Use residential benefits: * Reuse/clean-up of deteriorating buildings and vacant lots * Better architecture and landscaping * Transitions to residential neighborhoods * Places workers in proximity to jobs * Supports existing businesses * Increase "pedestrianization" of El Camino Real Planning Commission Recommended Options 1. Allow mixed use multi-family residential projects within the Commercial Retail and Commercial Professional zoning districts as a conditionally allowed use. 2. Require mixed use residential to be attached, multi-family type development. 3. Require all residential projects along Morro Road to include a commercial or office storefront along the street frontage with parking to the rear. 4. Allow exclusive multi-family residential development along El Camino Real. s.'d� ITEM NUMBER: B-1 DATE: 07/24/2001 Policy Option#5C: Affordable Housing-Multi-Family Density (units vs. bedrooms) * Current Standard based on Bedroom Units * Most units have one-bedroom and a"den" * Market demand is for 2 and 3 bedroom units * "Phantom" one-bedroom units result in uncalculated parking * 16 units/acre is lowest in County * All cities in San Luis Obispo County-set density by units San Luis Obispo City 24 du's/acre San Luis Obispo County 26 du's/acre Paso Robles 22 du's/acre (1 unit/2000 sf.) * Lending institutions and appraisers use units * State of California affordable housing allocations and density bonus requirements are based on units * It is so confusing it discourages developers and lenders Planning Commission Recommended Options 1. Recommend that multi-family densities be calculated by units rather than bedrooms. 2. Recommend increasing the maximum allowable multi-family density to 22-units/ac in certain areas. Policy Option #5D: Affordable Housing- Senior Housing * Changing demographics * Large lot maintenance and expense not appealing to seniors Planning Commission Recommended Option 1. Recommend that the General Plan provide a density bonus incentive for deed- restricted senior housing development projects and that staff look into various options for such. 1 N ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 Policy Option #5E: Affordable Housing—Inclusionary Housing ® San Luis Obispo adopted an Inclusionary Housing Ordinance in 1999., ® The Ordinance requires that new development projects include affordable housing units, dedicate land for affordable housing, or pay in lieu fee to assist in the development of affordable housing citywide. ® Residential projects: The Ordinance requires the developer to build 3% low or 5%moderate cost affordable dwelling units (adu) but not less than 1 affordable unit per project; or pay in-lieu fee equal to 5% of building valuation. ® Commercial Projects: The Ordinance requires 1 adu per acre, but not less than 1 adu per project; or pay in-lieu fee equal to 2% of building valuation. ® The ordinance excludes projects that are non-commercial in nature or which provide educational social or related services such as churches, day care centers, private schools, non-profit housing agencies and social service agencies. It also excludes construction of previously destroyed structures as long as they are rebuilt within three years. Planning Commission Recommended Option 1. Consider the adoption of an inclusionary affordable housing program similar to the City of San Luis Obispo. i • i � 1 ♦ 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,. ♦ <� III �•�,_�-�•:.. MA wn MA � . ►arm,:. as� �� �s lf � o INA r®® Alp 'r • a os' �, age s SI ` '•'C•�"'t►r .,ter • ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 Policy Option #7: Unincorporated Areas Planning Commission Recommended Options 1. Area A: Develop Future Annexation Policies 2. Area B: Remote: Leave in County 3. Area C: Developed: Leave in County 4. Area D: 400 undeveloped lots: City Control via Annexation Develop Future Annexation Policies 5. Area E: Developed: Leave in County Unincorporated Colony Areas May 29, 2001 �✓,nou ur sv.......... I L � I ,l 4.t / / 1 Y F 120 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 Policy Option #8: Lot Size Inconsistencies * Subdivisions prior to City incorporation created numerous lots smaller than 1/2 acre * Lots that are smaller than the minimum are considered"non-conforming" * Non-conforming lots are allowed the same uses as conforming lots * Majority of the lots in the study area are non-conforming * SFRA(1/2 acre) 82%non-conforming * SFR-Y (1 acre) 88%non-conforming * SFR-Z (1.5 acre) 74%non-conforming * SSF(2.5 acre) 74%non-conforming * Requests to split lots to match surrounding lot sizes source of GPA applications City of Alascadero General Plan Update Existing Non-conforming lots } r May 29,2001 fj t x A1C � l �y 4 i Planning Commission Recommended Option 1. Develop a customized Planned Development (PD) overlay process that could be applied to individual lots that are inconsistent with surrounding lots. 121 ITEM NUMBER: B- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 Policy Option #9: Downtown Mixed Use Parking Standards Planning Commission Recommended Options 1. Review the parking standards for mixed-use residential development within the Downtown land use designation as part of the General Plan Update. Policy Option #10: Colony Home Preservation Planning Commission Recommended Options 1. The General Plan will include policies for the historic preservation for Atascadero Colony homes. PREPARED BY: Warren Frace, Planning Services Manager ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes June 5, 2001 Attachment 2: Planning Commission Memo Attachment 3: Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes June 19, 2001 Attachment 4: Planning Commission Draft Land Use Plan Recommendation Attachment 5: Draft Council Resolution ��w Attachment 1:Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes June 5,2001 CITY OF ATASCADERO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting June 5, 2001 — 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Eddings called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and Commissioner Norton led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Bentz, Blaser, Fonzi, Kelley,Norton, Vice-Chairman Jeanes and Chairman Eddings Absent: None Staff. Community Development Director Lori Parcells, Principal Planner Warren Frace, Assistant Planner Phil Dunsmore, Associate Planner Jamie Kirk, Consultant Paul Crawford and Recording Secretary Grace Pucci. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: GPA 2000-0001 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE: REVIEW OF DRAFT LAND USE PLAN: The Planning Commission will be holding a public hearing to consider recommending a Draft Land Use Plan to the City Council for use in the General Plan Update process. The Draft Land Use Plan will be used for the preparation of a Draft General Plan Document and Draft Environmental Impact Report. No formal action to amend the current General Plan will be taken at this meeting. The public is encouraged to attend and will be given the opportunity to speak on the item. Staff Recommends: 1. The Planning Commission adopt Resolution 2001-026, thereby recommending that the City Council incorporate the Draft Land Use Plan as the Preferred Plan in the Draft General Plan policy document and Draft Environmental Impact Report. 123 Print Dale:07/18/01 File:072401-GP update.doc 2: The Planning Commission provide specific direction on Policy Issues I through 8 to be forwarded to the City Council for consideration. Principal Planner Warren Frace provided the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. PUBLIC COMMENT John McGoff, 9192 Maple Street, expressed his concern regarding possible conflict of interest issues with Planning Commission members on this item. (Attachment 1) David Jones, 8220 Larga, read from a prepared statement. He feels that the revised plan is a vast improvement and commended staff for listening to the opinions of the public. He would like to see additional attention given to the method for reclassification of nonconforming lots. (Attachment 2) Livia Kellerman, 5463 Honda, handed out a map of Plot 283 and a written statement to the Commissioners and gave a brief history of the property. She stated concern regarding the proposed high density zoning designation for this property. She would like it to remain in the recreational designation and supports creating more neighborhood parks in the community. (Attachment 3) Henry Engen, 9575 Lake View Drive, read from a prepared statement. He feels the process is going too fast. He is concerned with the population build out figures, wastewater treatment plant capacity, land use designations, mixed uses and affordable housing. (Attachment 4) Becky Pacas, 4305 San Benito Road, stated her opposition to the revised General Plan Land Use map and proposals. She is concerned with public health and safety and feels that California Codes do not require the proposed changes. Shawn Noth, Capistrano Avenue property owner, expressed his concern with the development around his property. He feels that the zoning designation on surrounding properties is not consistent with that of his property and he is requesting a zoning change to RMF-16. Henry Skibo, 3560 Traffic Way, read from a prepared statement submitted by 18 Traffic Way property owners. They object to the proposed General Plan Land Use Map, which does not include zoning changes to reduce minimum lot size in their area. (Attachment S) Ann Quinn, 7200 Toro Creek Road, is concerned with the lack of recreational facilities in the proposed general plan update. Marissa Todd, 4500 Del Rio Road, is opposed to the LUA No. 7 and urged the Commission to reconsider this action. She does not want access to the river cut off and would like to see this area remain as a green belt. 24 John Knight, RRM Design Group, spoke on behalf of the Smith-Hobson family who owns the area known as Eagle Ranch. He supports the annexation of Area D on the proposed land use map and would like to see this area included in the Urban Services Area. David Crouch, 7305 Curbaril, feels that the City is having trouble paying for services under its current general plan, and he worries how the City will afford to pay for services in areas which are being proposed for annexation. Regarding second units, he sees the potential for these units as well as the primary residence turning into rentals changing the area from single-family to multi-family density. Bill Obermeyer, 4800 Carrizo Road, expressed his concerns regarding the area on the north end near the river where the switch will take place. He does not want to see river access cut off and feels that the proposed housing will be too near the railroad tracks. He suggested easements in new developments that would interconnect and allow access between housing areas. Dorothy McNeil, read from a prepared statement regarding her feeling that it was not necessary to rewrite the entire General Plan as only the Housing Element needed review. (Attachment S) Theresa Wasley, 3060 Traffic Way stated her concern with safety on Traffic Way. She feels that if the area property owners were permitted to subdivide,they would be able to provide bike and pedestrian pathways making it safer for children and others to walk on Traffic Way. She is in favor of half-acre zoning along Traffic Way. Joan O'Keefe, 9985 Old Morro Road East, is concerned with the process utilized for the General Plan Update and the fact that there are no written materials available to the public. She would like to see the changes proposed for zoning inconsistencies be based on terrain and is concerned with the lack of pedestrian access as well as the lack of parks. Ann Ketcherside stated three issues of concern: 1) conflict of interest laws as they relate to this proposal, 2) loss of character within the community, and 3) changes within the downtown area. Jerry Johnson, Traffic Way property owner, feels it is unfair that he is not permitted to subdivide his property when others in the area are permitted to do so. Because the ground is flat in this area he feels the zoning should be changed to one-half acre. Richard Shannon, 5070 San Benito Road, stated that he is a property owner, developer and real estate agent and he feels it is difficult to find housing on smaller lots in Atascadero. He would like to see more zoning for smaller lots to permit increased housing. Chairman Eddings called a recess at 9:00 p.m. Chairman Eddings reopened the Public Hearing at 9:20 p.m. 125 Carmen Barnett, 6780 Atascadero Avenue, stated her opposition to the proposed changes on lot 283. She is concerned with the traffic and safety issues in the area, and feels this lot should be designated as a park. Principal Planner Frace gave a short history on this property. The property is privately owned and the current General Plan designation is recreation while the zoning on the parcel is RMF-16. The Department of Parks and Recreation has recommended that the recreation designation be eliminated, as there are no plans or funds to improve the lot as a park site. Under the proposed General Plan, the rear two-thirds of the property would have a multi- family use and the front corner would remain under a recreation designation. Mike Zappas, 8189 San Dimas Lane, felt that the previous speakers were very critical of the proposed changes and at the same time had no other plan to offer. He feels renters have needs for housing and he congratulated the planning staff on their outreach to the community. Raymond Jansen, 6655 Country Club Drive, expressed his concern regarding sewer capacity. He feels if the proposed General Plan is accepted, the wastewater treatment facility will have to be expanded to meet increasing need. John Gorse, Dolores Avenue, stated his pleasure with the staff recommendations as presented. He had several areas of concern including: 1) proposed changes in the zoning designation for the Rochelle and Woodlands properties, 2) he is not in favor of changing the zoning to one-half acre in the San Benito area, and 3) regarding second units, he feels that each request should be looked at individually to determine what is best for the property. Harold Meyers, property owner at Chico and Traffic Way, stated that in 1998 he was approached about the traffic problem in this area. He offered to dedicate a half-acre and in return he was promised that he would be included in the General Plan Update for a rezone to one-half acre lots. The proposed General Plan Update has not included his property for a rezone. He would like to withdraw his offer of dedication if the City is not going to stand by their promise. MOTION: By Chairman Eddings and seconded by CommissionTr Kelley to remove Items No. 3 and 4 from the Public Hearing Agenda and move them to the next Planning Commission meeting on June 19, 2001. AYES: Commissioners Kelley, Fonzi, Bentz,Norton, Blaser, Jeanes and Chairman Eddings. NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 7.0 by a roll-call vote. 126 Bill Bright, 11875 Santa Lucia, questioned how many lots are in the Y zone where second units would be allowed, and if the majority of property owners in the Y zone build second units, what would that do to the build-out numbers. Alan Thomas, 9520 Marchant Way, favors more affordable housing in Atascadero, especially multi-family housing. He is concerned with the heavy traffic in the Morro Road corridor. John McGoff, 9192 Maple, feels that more time must be given to the consideration of this update proposal. He feels the process is going too quickly and he is concerned with the lack of public record. Hary Pellet, 4320 Del Rio Road, spoke regarding the area from San Benito School back to the new development on Traffic Way. He feels there is a shortage of parks in Atascadero and he would like to see a bike path to the school as well as a park in this area. Ted Molanee, developer of the commercial project at 7730 Morro Road, feels that the increased traffic on Morro Road due to higher density development could be a real problem. He supports the idea of utilizing the property next to the library as a park or green belt. Livia Kellerman, 5463 Honda, expressed her disappointment with the Department of Parks and Recreation for not asking the people in the neighborhood about having a park in the lot near the library. Beck Pacas, 4305 San Benito, supports the idea of a green belt or ark near the library. She Y PP g P �' has concerns about increasing the build-out figure as a response to developer pressure. The population is growing and she feels it is important to meet the need for affordable housing. Jim Patterson, 9312 N. Santa Margarita Road, feels the process for the General Plan Update has changed and is currently driven by developer demands. He feels every recommendation made for the General Plan must be evaluated against the Smart Growth Principles and land use goals established by the community. Mike Wasley, 3060 Traffic Way, made several comments: 1) regarding the petition of 77 names mentioned by another speaker, not all of those who signed are property owners, 2) he has concern with the issue of traffic and safety along Traffic Way, 3) will this proposal meet the requirements for low income housing, and 4) many requests for information from last week's meeting have not been addressed. Alan Thomas, Marchant Way, stated that if the policy changes from bedrooms to units for housing density, he strongly urged that design guidelines be enforced regarding the look of the units,their position on the property,the space between them, playground areas for children, etc. Ray Johnson, stated that he has been told by the City that homes don't pay their way, so he feels that by increasing density there would be more income for City services. Several letters were turned in for the record, but were not read into the minutes. (Attachments 7,8) Chairman Eddings closed Public Comment. Chairman Eddings suggested that the Public Hearing be closed, but that the deliberations would be continued until the next Planning Commission meeting. There was agreement to this suggestion and Commissioners asked the following questions with the request that the information be provided them before the next meeting. Commissioner Fonzi 1. Re: Preserving prime multi-family areas for apartments -what is the definition of "Prime Multi-Family?" 2. If creek setback criteria are to be "flexible", they must also make sense—she would like some guidelines so that she can intelligently vote on this issue. 3. Re: Second Units—Why was the "Y" district chosen,what were the criteria for making it one acre or larger, and why must the area be sewered? 4. Re: Mixed uses and multi-family residential and commercial service area—she understands that commercial service should not be next to residential areas, however, she considers multi-family residential as residential as well and she would like to see the reasoning behind this. 5. Why are there only senior housing incentives? Should benefits be considered for extra housing for the handicapped? 6. What kinds of fees are proposed for inclusionary housing and what are they based upon? 7. She would like more information on the lot sizes in the annexation areas. 8. Re: The Rochelle property and the R.V. Park the Commission voted on. Is the fact that this area is in a flood zone being considered? She would like more information regarding the flood zone. Additionally, the access appears to be only through the back end of Home Depot. Is this a desirable location for access into a subdivision as it relates to safety, fire and police access and shoul&there not be two access points? Commissioner Norton 1. Requested clarification regarding the discrepancy with the sewer. Can someone from the Sewer Department speak to the Commission? 2. Where is the appropriate location for density for senior housing? 3. She would like to see an overlay on the map of where second unit housing would be located (the 400 to 600 lots). 4. Why did the estimate of the number of second units to be built annually go from 10 to 30? 5. What proposals have been done in the past regarding creek setbacks? 6. Re: Affordable housing mixed-use multi-family— She would like to see an overlay on the map of where those proposed areas would be. 123 Commissioner Kelley 1. Could someone from Parks and Recreation address the long-range plans the City has for parks? 2. Can larger projects in the future be mandated to include parks?, 3. He would like to see the specifications planned for second units. 4. He would like to see a uniform policy on creek setbacks. Commissioner Jeanes 1. Requested an inventory by the next meeting of what is currently zoned for recreation. 2. What would be the length of time for the pilot program on second units? 3. Would like guidelines on the criteria for RMF-16 if there were to be a change from bedrooms to units. ' 4. What are the traffic implications on Morro Road if all recommendations are passed to City Council? 5. She would like a staff report by the next meeting on the Traffic Way properties and what is happening with this issue. Have they been promised things they have not been given and if so how should this be addressed? Chairman Eddings 1. Supports the idea of more community parks. He would like to see more areas designated for parks mixed in with the multi-family areas. 2. Would like the density bonuses for affordable housing to be kept after the decisions have been made on density requirements for high and medium density multi-family areas. Commissioner Blaser 1. What are the actual numbers on how many lots are "nonconforming" and what is the total if they were to be split into lots the size of those in surrounding areas? 2. What would be the cost of the infrastructure to support the new General Plan proposal? 3. Is there a grading ordinance or guideline to follow when developing lots? MOTION: By Commissioner Fonzi and seconded by Commissioner Norton to continue the meeting to June 19,2001,Rotunda Room,Atascadero City Hall. AYES: Commissioners Fonzi, Norton, Blaser, Bentz, Kelley,Jeanes and Chairman Eddings. NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Motionp assed 7.0 by a roll-call vote. 129 Attachment 2: Planning Commission Memo Memorandum Date: June 12, 2001 To: Planning Commission From: Planning Staff RE: General Plan Update Questions from Planning Commissioners-June 512001 Planning Commission Question Staff Response Commissioner Fonzi 1. Preserving prime multi-family areas for Staff would recommend that the following factors be apartments-what is the definition of'Prime included in a definition of"Prime Multi-Family." Multi-Family?" 1. Lot size: Lots or contiguous ownership of 2+acres. 2.Slope: below 10% 3.Arterial or collector street access 4. Neighborhood compatibility 2. If creek setback criteria are to be"flexible", Refer to Attachment 1, excerpts of San Luis Obispo's it must also make sense—she would like creek setback standards. There appeared to be some some guidelines so that she can misinterpretation of staffs use of the term"flexible." intelligently vote on this issue. Flexible was meant to describe a hierarchy of setback standards that would address the various lot sizes and uses along the creeks. For example the setback for 100-foot deep downtown lots would be different than the standard for suburban lots with 2.5 acre minimums. 3. Second Units—Why was the"Y"district Staff recommended the Y district because of the larger chosen,what was the criteria for making it lot sizes and availability of sewer. As a pilot program, one acre or larger, and why must the area the larger lot size is desirable because parking, be sewered? setback and neighborhood compatibility issues are easily accommodated on a 1 acre lot. Staff believes sewer is a mandatory requirement for second units. Multiple septic systems on residential lots increase the likelihood of failures and absorption problems that could impact public health and water quality. 4. How will mixed uses and multi-family Staff is recommending that both multi-family residential residential and commercial compatibility be and heavy service commercial uses be"conditional addressed. allowed"uses within the new General Commercial land use. The CUP process would allow staff and the Commission the ability to analyze and condition projects to avoid incompatibilities. In addition, standards to address buffering and setbacks between residential and commercial uses could be included in 100 Planning Commission Question Staff Response the zoning ordinance. Projects that could not meet these standards would not be approved. 5. Why are there only senior housing The Uniform Building Code requires a certain incentives? Should benefits be considered percentage of all multi-family units to be handicapped for extra housing for the handicapped? accessible. Staff is not aware of any other jurisdictions that provide density bonuses for handicapped accessible units. 6. What kinds of fees are proposed for Policy Option 5E of the staff report outlined the inclusionary housing and what are they requirements of San Luis Obispo's inclusionary based upon? program. Their fees are based on building valuations. On residential projects,the in-lieu fee is 5%of building value and on commercial the fee is 2%of building value. 7. Information on the lot sizes in the Eagle Colony Lots=402 parcels Ranch annexation areas. 2924±acres total min lot size=.02 acres ave lot size=7.2 acres max lot size= 175 acres 8. Is the Rochelle property and the R.V. Park The portion of the Rochelle property approved for the area in a flood zone? She would like more RV park and now proposed for single-family residential information regarding the flood zone. is outside of both the 100 and 500-year flood plains. Additionally,the access appears to be only Refer to Attachment 2. through the back end of Home Depot, is this a desirable location for access into a The primary access will come from an extension of EI subdivision as it relates to safety,fire and Camino Real which is an arterial street designed to police access and should there not be two accommodate the expected traffic levels. A secondary access points. emergency access connection will be provided at Ferrocaril. This secondary access would benefit both the Rochelle property as well as the Ferrocaril and Lakes neighborhoods which could have access impacted by a closure of the Chico Road railroad crossing. Commissioner Norton 9. Requested clarification regarding the Staff will provide additional information at the meeting discrepancy with the sewer. Can someone regarding the wastewater treatment plant. from the Sewer Department speak to the Commission? 10. Where is the appropriate location for A senior housing project would likely require the same density for senior housing? site features as a multi-family project which would include sewer, major street access, slopes of less than 10%, and parcel area of 2 to 5 acres. Most of the locations that fit these criteria would be along EI Camino Real. 11. She would like to see an overlay on the Refer to Attachment 3. map of where second unit housing would 250 lots meet the criteria of having a SFR-Y be located(the 400 to 600 lots). designation and being at least a 1-acre 12. Why did the estimate of the number of Staff has had difficulty retrieving an accurate number second units to be built annually go from 10 from the computer based permitting system. Part of to 30? the issue involves the fact that there is no special review or approval required for guest houses, therefore it is difficult to track the permits. Staff believes that an accurate number for guest house permits issued in 2000 is 13 units. 13. What proposals have been done in the past The City used to have a standard 50-foot creek .i,31 Planning Commission Question Staff Response regarding creek setbacks? setback. Ordinance 236). 14. Affordable housing mixed-use multi-family— Refer to Attachment 4 She would like to see an overlay on the Staff is recommending multi-family residential be map of where those proposed areas would conditionally allowed in the CR and CP zoning be. districts. Commissioner Kelley 15. Could someone from Parks and Recreation Geoff English from the Community Services address the long-range plans the City has Department will attend the meeting to discuss parkland for arks? issues and plans. 16. Can larger projects in the future be Currently the City does have an open space/recreation mandated to include parks? requirement for multi-family projects and the City's subdivision ordinance does require the dedication of parkland in conjunction with subdivisions of more than 50 units. Projects of less than 50 units may pay an in- lieu fee instead of dedicating parkland. Planning Commission discussion of additional parkland and open space requirements on larger residential projects would be helpful to staff. 17. He would like to see the specifications Refer to Policy Option 5A of the staff report. tanned for second units. 18. He would like to see a uniform policy on Staff recommends the Commission discuss this issue creek setbacks. and provide direction. Refer to Attachment 1 for example of San Luis Obispo's creek setback standards. Commissioner Jeanes 19. Requested an inventory by the next Refer to Attachment 5. meeting of what is currently zoned for There are 686 acres designated as Recreation under recreation. the General Plan. This figure is misleading because it includes creek reservations and private commercial recreation areas. Also Paloma Creek Park is designated as Public so it is not included. Policy Option 2(land use designations)would address this issue by creating new Open Space and Commercial Recreation designations. The Recreation designation could then accurately reflect park facilities. 20. What would be the length of time for the Staff does not propose any sunset dates. Ideally, if pilot program on second units? the program is successful it could be expanded, if it is not successful it should be revised or repealed. 21. Would like guidelines on the criteria for Refer to Attachment 6 for current RMF-16 RMF-16 if there were to be a change from development standards. The Commission may wish to bedrooms to units. have staff look into changes for these standards. 22. What are the traffic implications on Morro Traffic issues are being addressed by the traffic Road if all recommendations are passed to consultant as part of the General Plan EIR.The traffic City Council? study will recommend mitigation measures to address the impacts of new development. The current traffic problems on Morro Road (SR 41) are the result of the Caltrans 41 re-alignment project. Caltrans and the City are collaborating on an interchange redesign project that will improve traffic . operations at the freeway. 23. Would like a staff report by the next This issue dates back a number of years and began meeting on the Traffic Way properties and prior to the current staffs tenure. It appears that as what is happening with this issue. part of the Mackey Project, discussions occurred about 132 Planning Commission Question Staff Response including these parcels(LUA 11)in the General Plan Amendment process. When that did not happen, a subsequent discussion occurred about including the area in the Davis-Shores General Plan Amendment. Due to the controversy within the LUA-11 area,the applicant for the Davis-Shores project did not want this area included. Consequently, a third discussion occurred that this area would be addressed in the General Plan Update process. To date this area has been included in the General Plan update as LUA-11. LUA-11 was included in Draft Alternatives 2 and 3 but not 1. Since a refinement of Alternative 1 has emerged as the preferred option, LUA-11 has been excluded. The Planning Commission does have the ability to recommend changes to the refined alternative. Chairman Eddin s 24. Supports the idea of more community Refer to previous discussion points(15, 16& 19). parks. He would like to see more areas designated for parks mixed in with the multi-family areas. 25. Would like the density bonuses for The State requires the Cities to grant density bonus for affordable housing to be kept after the affordable housing regardless of the maximum density. decisions have been made on density requirements for high and medium density multi-family areas. Commissioner Blaser 26. What are the actual numbers on how many SFR-X 1095 total lots lots are"nonconforming"and what is the 909 non-conforming lots total if they were to be split into lots the size 36 lots:possible subdivision of those in surrounding areas? SFR-Y 2286 total lots 2035 non-conforming lots 42 lots: possible subdivision SFR-Z 544 total lots 408 non-conforming lots 19 lots:possible subdivision 27. What would be the cost of the infrastructure Infrastructure costs will be addressed as part of EIR to support the new General Plan proposal? and a facilities fee study that is currently in process. 28. Is there a grading ordinance or guideline to Preparation of a grading ordinance would require a follow when developing lots? significant allocation of staff time. If the Commission wishes to pursue a grading ordinance,policies should be included in the General Plan identifying the preparation of a grading ordinance as a staff priority. The grading ordinance would likely become part of the zoning ordinance and would be prepared after the General Plan is adopted. Attachment 1 San Luis Obispo's Creek Setback Standards 17.16.025 Creek shacks. A. Purpose. Creek setbacks are intended to: 1. Protect scenic resources,water quality,and natural creekside habitat, including opportunities for wildlife habitation,rest,and movement 2. Further the restoration of damaged or degraded habitat,especially where a continuous riparian habitat corridor can be established. 3. Now for natural changes that may occur within the creek corridor. 4.Help avoid damage to development from erosion and flooding. 5.Enable implementation of adopted City plans. B. Waterways Subject to Setbacks. Creek setback requirements shall apply to all creeks as defined in the Open Space Element and shown on that element's Creek Map,and only to those creeks. C. Measurement of Creek Setbacks. Creek setbacks shall be measured from the existing top of bank(or the future top of bank resulting from a creek alteration reflected in a plan approved by the City),or from the edge of the predominant pattern of riparian vegetation, whichever is farther from the creek flow line. The Community Development Director may determine the predominant pattern of riparian vegetation,where the edge of the vegetation varies greatly in a short length along the creek,in a way unrelated to topography(for example,the Director will not base the setback line on individual trees or branches extending out from the channel or on small gaps in vegetation extending toward the channel).Where riparian vegetation extends over a public street,no creek setback Is required on property which is on the side of the street away from the creek. • • Sob— up of sat • • • ' • , . . • 'a•ar.dsreoar i zonmq RequWtions 134 D.Plan Information. The location of top of bank and of 3. Larger Setbacks. To mitigate potentially significa' riparian vegetation shall be shown on all project plans environmental impacts in compliance with the Califo subject to City approval. The location of these features Environmental Quality Act,or to implement adopted City Is subject to confirmation by the Community plans, when approving a discretionary application the" Development Director, based on observation of actual City may require setbacks larger than required by parts conditions and, as needed,the conclusions of persons 1 and 2 above,or further limitations on the items which with expertise in hydrology,biology,or geology. may be placed within setbacks. (Also, other City regulations may restrict or prevent development in a E. Creek Setback Dimensions. Different setback floodway or floodplain.) dimensions are established In recognition of different parcel sizes and locations of existing structures for 4. Prior Approvals. Where the City has explicitly areas within the city in comparison with areas which approved a creek setback smaller than required by this may be annexed,and in response to different sizes of section,prior to adoption of this section;by action on a creek channels and tributary drainage areas. tract or parcel map (whether or not a vesting map), architectural review application, use permit, Planned 1.Creeks within the 1996 City Limits. Along all creeks Development zoning,or Special Considerations zoning, within the city limits as of July 1,1996,the setback shall that smaller setback shall remain in effect so long as the be 20 feet, except as provided in parts E.3, EA or G approval is in effect below. Where the city limit follows a creek,the setback on the side within the 1996 city limits shall be 20 feet F.Items Prohibited within Setbacks. The following shall and the setback on the annexed side shall be as not be placed or constructed within a creek setback, provided in part2 below. except as provided In part G below:structures;paving; parking lots; in nonresidential zones, areas used for 2. Creeks in Areas Annexed After 1996. Along any storing or working on vehicles,equipment,or materials. creek in an area annexed to the City after July 1, 1996, the following setbacks shall be provided, unless a G.Exceptions To Creek Setbacks. specific plan or development plan approved by the City Council provides a larger or smaller setback,consistent 1. Entitled Replacement Structures. Where a stricture with the purpose of these regulations and with General lawfully existed on or before October 3, 1996,within a Plan polices. creek setback required by this chapter. a. Fifty-foot Setbacks. The setback along the following a.Anystructure built in replacement of such a structure shall be 50 feet: San Luis Obispo Creek(all of main may occupy the same footprint, within the creek branch); San Luis Obispo Creek East Fork, from San setback, as the previous structure. (See also part Luis Obispo Creek(main branch)to the confluence with 17.16.020.E.1.d.) Acacia Creek;Stenner Creek. b. Additional floor area shall not be added to the b. Thirty-five-foot Setbacks. The setback along the encroaching part of the structure (for example, by following shall be 35 feet Prefumo Creek;Froom Creek; adding stories). Brizziolari Creek; San Luis Obispo Creek East Fork tributary, from the confluence with Acacia Creek to c. The part of a structure which is nonconforming due Broad Street (Highway 227); Acacia Creek and its solely to the creek setback encroachment may be tributaries west of Broad Street (Highway 227); the remodeled without regard to the limits of parts segment of the tributary of Acacia Creek which flows 17.14.020.B and C of this title. generally parallel to and on the easterly side of Broad Street(Highway 227),from Broad Street to Fuller Road. 2. Entitled Accessory Structures and Uses. The following items may be located within the required creek c. Twenty-foot Setbacks. The setback along all creeks setback, provided that they:do not extend beyond the except those listed in parts "a" and "b" immediately top of bank into the creek channel;will not cause the above shall be 20 feet removal of native riparian vegetation;will not reduce any flooding capacity pursuant to the City's Flood Damage (Informational map is available in the Community Prevention Regulations; in total occupy not more than Development Department) bne-half of the setback area; are consistent with other property development standards of the Zoning Regulations. crty o{:san Luis osispo 36 zoning uequiations 135 a. Walls or fences, provided that in combination with d. Findings. Each discretionary exception shall be buildings they enclose not more than one-half of the subject to each of the following findings,regardless of setback area on any development site. the type of project application under which the request is considered. b. Parking spaces for single-family dwellings; patios; walkways. I.The location and design of the feature receiving the exception will minimize impacts to scenic resources, c. Decks,stairs,and landings which are no more than water quality, and riparian habitat, including 30 inches in height opportunities forwiktlife habitation,rest,and movement d. One-story, detached buildings used as tool and ii.The exception will not limit the City's design options for storage sheds,play houses,and similar uses,provided providing fkxxf control measures that are needed to the projected roof area does not exceed 120 square achieve adopted City flood policies; feet iii.The exception will not prevent the implementation of e. Garden structures such as trellises, arbors, and City-adopted plans, nor increase the adverse gazebos,provided they are constructed using an open environmental effects of implementing such plans; lattice design and lightweight materials iv.There are circumstances applying to the site,such as 3. Entitled Architectural Features. The following size,shape or topography,which do not apply generally architectural features may extend Into the setback up to to land in the vicinity with the same zoning,that would 30 inches: cornices, canopies, eaves, buttresses, deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other chimneys, solar collectors, shading louvers, wafer property in the vicinity with the same zoning; heater enclosures,and bay or other projecting windows that do not include usable floor space. v. The exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege--an entitlement inconsistentwith the limitations 4.Discretionary Exceptions. upon other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning;and a. Intent. Discretionary exceptions to creek setback standards are Intended to allow reasonable use of sites vi. The exception will not be detrimental to the public which are subject to creek setbacks,where there is no welfare or injurious to other property in the area of the practicable alternative to the exception. Generally,such projector downstream. ' exceptions are limited to small parcels which are essentially surrounded by sites that have been e.Biological Survey. A biological survey by a qualified, developed with setbacks smaller than those in part E independent person shall be required for each above. discretionary exception request,to provide the basis for making finding "dX above, unless waived by the b. Application Type. A creek setback smaller than Community Development Director upon determining that required by part E above may be approved by City no purpose would be served by such a survey because action on a plan for public facilities approved by the City no biological resources could be affected by the Council or on a specific plan,development plan under exception, planned development zoning,land division,use permit or architectural review. Where one of these types of f. Application Contents. In addition to any other applications is not otherwise required for the proposed information required for a project application,a request feature,an exception request shall be in the form of an for creek setback exception shall include the following: administrative use permit I.A description of the feature or features proposed for c.Public Notice. Public notice for a project involving a exception and the extentof the exception. creek setback exception,regardless of application type, shall include a clear description of the feature or features H. A description of potential design changes for the proposed to receive the exception,and the extent of the project which would eliminate or reduce the need for the exception. exception. iii.A statement of reasons why an exception is deemed necessary by the applicant crcy of san tuts osrspo 37 zonmq nequlatrons ' 136 Attachment 2 Rochelle Property Flood Plain 500 year flood plain l� 100 year flood plain ' I Proposed collector , street access Ferrocarii emergency access I (no through traffic) Rochelle property '�' � p P Y , z (� I I I j oil rig 31, / Nt+ `�rr�i �1 1r r\I��JJ►�. ._1iri+t1.*r,,o ♦ IIi ♦ it s��,r r ti� ti. . .e,�.• ., �'y, .� /'� 4aW`��'P.�t#_.i. '`a1{ -INA � 14 !� !" �pf,rel axi �_ 1♦ r\��p �. s allyON �Ir r Rid Yvr 1~v`I� l�t�1s1��/�i� a a4�� ■ A �.• `� f� �� ;,;�R iii a�� 4� 'rr�Ii r� ►ter r e�a *l At WFANG A WA m ♦ Iq ♦OL ♦ ' ♦: ♦r� .. r r= s 1 •� ♦ g _�j �1.`�+.. ♦ . y3�1,+f `�`a^�' tea/o,+'o -.#�*r��l�* , !� �����'ar�+� ��F�* ,�1r� � ♦ �!' ��� �*�`•mfr^3 � � �+j+� �. f�':�',T�r�Y Sti� ��al►�♦i�`���t r-.�, ,4��#'r�t �i�� i I r�i r�r ''���� �����f,,{�`ii�'!ryir*�"*�`�' r �� ♦�.��'/�y�� �r1/ ��a!■ r,1�1��� ,, ��1/fi�! ��►�R.4aa��41111. /I.ir��i".r''���V�t*i�I�i�'�� �� �/�r�1'�+`i� s K'''• 1 I�•��w�.�._ kkaLi� �V� art �nri Z/.�+�rf�� '��I+rr Ij��' .syfvll �f a •*� 1 Wk- �♦l������' �����'��#�I�.`'�"� J �1�i+.�ii.fr�r �"Ia►''4�'4+�i�w=1�L �l��i,��' �1 ��jr,t,��► ♦:1f�^i�V1��� " a��F-•�*+a i„FEr'+�r �i�f,�i/�r1..�3 � �� ����, M. ��i,' •rt■■iQ;;I y.�,#11+t?��a;► `' r` moi,, a ■,`:rAt +`� �',4 ♦ r��t>P�1 i �'�•• ... �� „4+�r, . Lots with SFR-Y zoning ♦'ice♦ 1 �► / and>1 acre yam.;+� i� '� �i'�,�� � +rail a�� .4,�J 1►w. ��� .�,fir, �.!y1 �."4:�.♦ it . # o i✓ ; ''��.�� �<�ti ��1■���s '� •. ori r I��*Ff. f•., r� prst.:,w ���� ���*��4 •''�SC 1�!!ll�+h. r y��J1��y�'t����a s�t����JJ%�i'��v�,;°. - 1,► �' r' r�■r� .t r 2R•. � ���1, ��f r �J4l -rr,"nn t � �� � � �.1 ♦S ..,t,������►iii�`�ft `�{�1- ��i� .r !����' �"M +■�'� ��s `tr#�y1�E ��l�I���11� S V�IJ I��,r ����*M 1� � 114.. a+~' � ,, x yrs*�+ � ;���1 1 ,}'} ♦ +. Areas with CR or CP rj rs 1�,j�1 .;���i�+�W, MO,'I �j�l•,1..•� •a�., (I + �ice* a+rte� �r .4;•;�frP/111;ROMs% EA �' �r.♦ � r. ;� .�♦�*♦!!+*.�`pip+1��q,���'ws���+f�,( r /'�1•. 60 MMA ��� r.�j"� l+� *•�� �1�i� ��f`1 •�� r � � ♦If Illji �j�I r � �, �� ♦�I jlj� �g,��f lrwll� �li F r ti r��► �� I+,`��!lljj flf,�•.`xjj� tlyxjy'l► 1 /�+� �HIS ,� � �•'��,+• ,�c�� '•f;.�,�"�rte•��"►. �I►� �� � �,. ��.�♦ � 1• �♦ �� ,♦ ♦ x151- / Ii .•. � s. .,-G��.�� �..� .� � .� Orr-�.ii.�-_�',.•,•�� - I� ♦� INA, 4�a��►i �sy �t`��+ ..1j ♦ �ta��/i rr�►it*.��r`� ��.ti � � +at1�'tU �f�� ����♦'.� '��. IF,IMV W���'I P. WE 1W ►i� �` I f� Ii t���{yrr k r � I4?1 rr'+ �a ry I��`fji 1�rw~ � r+.t�Ir,����� i■ f� i��►� i�1►-**%�0� ������1��-�:: �,�..�-:mow. f. .,•,,, ,•,: ��Rf�, ti 4;�# �i�t►�+rte �II ��%,+`��`l� � �..: ���•�,a �r .. r0��► ��� �����@+�`��f♦fit����� rtr � /� + 1 f �♦. � ■ref 1�,��M., �4`'���Il��t w1%I 1��� � �����01 ��.���� Recreation land useareas L.r+►N4 ��y+►��I ��w*{i1�t►710<t+i>; s ��r��R.i +/* �a*�++r�i '`rr rrPOP ;I0��ft►4lJir ��;� +r1 I, im-7/�111�+� ♦fl4 i� �.��++lt .�� *1► 11 .• ; b/per+'f��a ►71 ♦ "4 +!r� ya F �1��� / �` l♦ %• . . . Wo MEN 4Alp 1 �.;.- .� %i� *•��OKA =414i. .•- `W� �'1 +tea r�� :i♦ rr 4�z. <a i r .;.#� `�+it frr��� ��� Ams a4�����'•.,�,�.,��1�..r �r, � �' � �4f �+ ��'�, ',� y,►sPr sI�*�f+��y�" � '��r1�{rrj j,�s j� MIA WK .rr1fl } a��� �• Ar+T + ♦�yl �b/rrr ,+,�*/rr- �+1 ln�. .�y R�a f3 �nrQ+,,,.+ '; s ' :�,rO�rl+`�I1� ` ��►``� //� . +�Ah�c-?t.;r+. e�� i 3 O.:>r ��i ►J'> .�� . iir �.11,�f/' �;��/alf�w�•t� �+t��`h.r,,■•�i'� ,'�+.k ; +.,,+, •rte`}�li ��1� _�r {*�`�.�- r t,l v i rlr�� r ♦ +amu s dL fiM I� �j� M►r1lL/ 1� c r �>✓. ;• �r` � � �t f r r!I �•� ���♦,�1��` ��r,. +��,� {1� • .�y� 3tr a � 9 i�10 � ..f 7�i�l� 4 � / I + ���►I��`�����I �•'r �r�� �' v -c. • x i ��r��- 74f�!�.''�<.VM���f� 1j► . + ► ��OxI I��awR �i�,wx�.��,M st. , , tar *�� �`� *raft ��Ii!1`� �� r�• �: = z � e +i al t� Ni• �*,��_/ �i 'N •Jr j,rV�t »Ytr I l -�r0�`r �� ♦!J � Mj,�� i �%.w♦i.r�lA �� �� ♦�;fXi���t� jyrr' �►� Irr ?ryy+ L41 9:\ C�,k!jffi4fjL N OWN 417 AMWWr4IP-�Zr ��}�r�����r t— Ij c ram dot �R�++x��� 1 lit' •Ri+�oMF r�a.+1 ��f` ✓�,� �i0. I,- -NI +s yA► \���+`�5�� 1�� !E � her � :•'i+'�' ���� �r�i�,.l.r,�X1111��r ���,R ►a►/�•���'. ?+�� .,, , , ��/ �� mar. w� II��,'�i,�{r Wilt, IN ��� Attachment 6 RMF-16 Development Standards Maximum Building Height:30 feet(not to exceed two stories) Setbacks: Front Rear Side 25 feet 10 feet 5 feet Parking: 1 bedroom unit 1.5 spaces 2 bedroom unit 2.0 spaces each additional bedroom.5 spaces Property Development Standards a) Percent Coverage:The maximum percent of a lot that may be covered by structures shall be 40%for Low Density Multiple Family projects and 50%coverage for High Density Multiple Family projects. b) Enclosed Storage:Each dwelling unit shall be provided a minimum of 100 sq.ft.of enclosed storage space, exclusive of closets,which may be located in either a principle or accessory building. c) Outdoor Recreation Areas:For developments of 4-7 dwelling units,outdoor recreational open space shall be provided at a ratio of 300 sq.ft.per unit. d) Screen Wall:A solid wall or fence not less than six feet in height shall be placed and maintained on interior lot lines abutting property zoned for single family residential use. e) Covered Parking:One covered parking space shall be required per dwelling unit of the total off-street spaces required by the City's Zoning Ordinance. 141 Attachment 3: Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes June 19,2001 REGULAR MEETING, 7:00 P.M. Chairman Eddings called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENT None CONSENT CALENDAR 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 5,2001. MOTION: By Commissioner Fonzi and seconded by Commissioner Kelley to approve the Consent Calendar. AYES: Commissioners Fonzi, Kelley, Blaser,Norton, Jeanes and Chairman Eddings. NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 6:0 by a roll-call vote. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM CONTINUED FROM 6/5/01 4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: GPA 2000-0001 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE: REVIEW OF DRAFT LAND USE PLAN: This project is continued for deliberation (public hearing portion was closed on 6/5/01). The Planning Commission will be deliberating the consideration of a recommended Draft Land Use Map to the City Council for use in the General Plan Update process. The Draft Land Use Map will be used for the preparation of a Draft General Plan Document and Draft environmental Impact Report. No formal action to amend the current General Plan will be taken at this meeting. Chairman Eddings announced that the public hearing had been closed at the previous meeting, but that additional public comment would be taken prior to Commission deliberations. Public comment would be limited to 3 minutes. Principal Planner Warren Frace gave a brief overview of the staff report given at the June 5, 2001 meeting, and addressed the key points of discussion from that meeting. 142 REOPENED PUBLIC COMMENT Joan O'Keefe 9985 Old Morro Road East read from are ared statement addressing her p p g concerns regarding the Urban Service Line, prime multi-family areas, zone changes for the Rochelle/Gearhart property, parks, bonus densities for affordable housing and the need for a grading ordinance. (Attachment 2) Marissa Todd, 4500 Del Rio Road, speaking on behalf of the Atascadero's Horseman's Club, read from a prepared statement expressing the Club's concern regarding the Kelly Gearhart housing development located in the LUA-7 section of the general plan update and the need for public access to the de Anza Historic Trail in that area. (Attachment 3) Levi Barrett, 1950 Traffic Way, spoke on behalf of himself and Wade Tilly who resides at 4505 Santa Cruz. He feels the build out figure is arbitrary and this method of planning is fraught with difficulty. Richard Shannon, 5070 San Benito Road, requested clarification on the zoning for the intersection of Del Rio Road and El Camino Real. Jerry Johnson, Obispo Road and Traffic Way, stated that he would like to see smaller lots in the area near his home. Mike Baumberger, Atascadero Avenue, encouraged the Commission to change the zoning in the area near his property to one-half acre lots. Alan Thomas, 9520 Marchant Way, asked if City Staff would recalculate the population numbers based on adoption of the eight Policy Options. Principal Planner Frace responded that staff would communicate the potential impacts of the Policy Options when the Draft Plan is presented to the Council. The EIR will address all potential impacts. A letter was received from the Traffic Way Property Owners regarding the zoning change for the San Benito School area. (Attachment 4) Chairman Eddings closed Public Comment. There was a brief question and answer period before deliberations began. POLICY OPTION #1: URBAN SERVICES LINE Commissioner Fonzi referred to page no. 73, second bulleted item, "Provision of all services should be considered," and stated that she does not feel that statement should be included in this Policy Option and would like to see it removed. Commissioner Norton asked for additional information on the wastewater treatment plant capacities. Principal Planner Frace stated that the Regional Quality Control Board reissued Atascadero's Discharge Permit in March. At that time the discharge amount was increased 143 from 1.67 million gallons per day (MGD) to 2.39 MGD. Currently the average daily rate is 1.4 MGD. The actual capacity of the infiltration basins is 11.6 MGD. Occasional storms which exceed the 10 year event will bring rain water into the system and will cause the average daily peak to exceed the old 1.67 MGD rate, however, in the past 12 years the rate has never come close to 2.39 MGD. Based on the new 2.39 MGD rate and the city growing at an average of I% per year, it will take approximately 40 years to use up that capacity. The plant meets all State standards. Commissioner Jeans asked if it was feasible to remove bulleted item 2 on page no. 73 per Commissioner Fonzi's recommendation. Mr. Frace stated that staff is looking for a recommendation from the Commission as to the area to be included in the Urban Services Line. The USL is not an entitlement but rather an intention for the future; the intent is not to require all within the area to sewer their properties. Mr. Frace suggested the recommendation could include language to read "The Urban Service Line be adopted as shown on the attachment, but the intent would not be to require all parcels within the USL to connect to sewer." MOTION: By Vice Chairman Jeanes and seconded by Commissioner Fonzi to recommend to the City Council the expansion of the Urban Service Line as proposed under Policy Option#1 as follows: Recommended Option 1. Recommend adoption of the revised Urban Service Line as shown. 2. Develop a policy that not all lots with the Urban Service Line are required to be served by sewer. 144 1 1 11 1 r 1�•a�a■na�a■eras, • „® ,dam�,����:'�•aaanon►,-��r , WONla(gl � °l NOW T�• !���`� ���` h�®' ~fir�''z.� �+� "�.. t IB ♦.. . tea.. :v WE �V►�r�A`� �1�����I I ��-ka o`� '-aiwi,sY gip' �1N_iry .ri ,P- v �a�e• Chairman Eddings referred to a letter the Commission received from the Chamber of Commerce pertaining to the Commercial/Industrial zoning in which they recommend two broad zones, one Commercial and one Industrial, to give applicants more flexibility to handle issues at the staff level. Mr. Frace indicated that staff agrees with the industrial recommendation. In the commercial districts staff is recommending consolidation of neighborhood commercial, tourist commercial, office district and retail commercial into a single designation called General Commercial. Staff felt it was appropriate to keep Service Commercial separated at a general plan level so heavier service uses do not encroach into residential areas. The Downtown designation is one of the commercial uses that is specific to the downtown and should be kept separate. The Commercial Park designation is a special district for light industrial and commercial with many specific requirements suited to the northern El Camino area. MOTION: By Commissioner Fonzi and seconded by Commissioner Kelley to recommend Policy Option #2 as follows: Recommended Option 1. Recommend incorporation of the new Land Use Designations in Updated General Plan 6dsti I"Usm LocbW Land Uses AIG Agic ltue AG AgicUtue OS Open Faesdential FSR R.ral Pb id3tal RR Rid Residatid SSF Srxje Fm ily SUbrban(25-10 acre Ict nin) FEE Rid Estates(25-10 acre Ict nin)[outside LGQ SE Slur m Estates(25-10 acre Id nin)[irride LJSL] LSF LoN Derrity S1rge Fainly SFR,Z Grge Fainly Residential(1.5-25 acre Ict nin) NDSF Medun Derraty S n je Family SF R-Y Srxje Fanily Ra;idart d(1.0-1.5 acre Ict nin) FDSF Hqh Density Slr rje Fanily SFR-X SSrge Family Fbddat el(0.5 acre Id nin) LDIVF LavDensaty Ml -FbMly(10 bedwm/ac) IVM Medun Dersaty Pesidertaal(10 cus/ar) HCIVF Hgh Dansity Mlta-Fanny(16 bedwm/ac) FM !Hgr Density Redde teal(16 cis/ac) Corr mrdal NC I bb jt ahood Cam-alai Combine with GCC RC Retal Umna dal CSC General Canneraal SC Sauce O nn-ectal SC Sa-4oe Ccn rierdel TC Touist Ca -adal Combine with CSC D DwtO n D Dannon O Me Carbne with OC CPK Can'rsrdal Paris CPK UnTrerdal Park IW Wed Use Camr e icd Industrial ird.std2i IND Iriustdal IPK Irdstdd Pais Combine with IND Public/GLasi-Public P Public Facilitates PUB Rbic Facilities FEL Reaeetim FX Pudic R3xeatim CREC Oxmie tical Reaeatim AYES: Commissioners Fonzi, Kelley, Blaser,Norton, Jeanes and Chairman Eddings NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 6:0 by a roll-call vote. POLICY OPTION #3: PD-7 DISTRICT EXPANSION 147 Principal Planner Frace provided the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. Commissioner Fonzi stated that she would like to see the definition of Prime Multi Family areas included within the General Plan as stated on page no. 92. Additionally, she would like to add to Option #3 that the PD-7 overlay be applied to properties that can provide a "demonstrable public benefit" such as open space or recreational use or tree conservation, etc. Chairman Eddings indicated that he prefers that PD-7 not be allowed in the high or medium density multi-family zoned lots. He feels that this is how apartment properties are lost. MOTION: By Vice Chairman Jeanes to recommend to the City Council the PD-7 recommendations as set forth by staff preserving prime multi-family areas with the four points as outlined on page no. 92. Commissioner Fonzi requested the Motion be amended to add that the PD-7 overlay be applied to properties that can provide a demonstrable public benefit such as open space, recreational use, affordable and senior housing, etc. A discussion ensued regarding Commissioner Fonzi's amendment. MOTION: By Vice-Chairman Jeanes and seconded by Commissioner Kelley to recommend to the City Council Policy Option #3 as follows: Recommended Options 1. Recommend that standards for a new PD-7 type overlay district be developed for the SFR-X land use designation in order to allow small lot single family infill development. 2. Recommend that RMF property meeting the following standards be preserved as "prime"multi-family areas for apartment development and preclude conversion to PD-7. a. Lot size: Lots or contiguous ownership of 2+ acres. b. Slope: Below 10% C. Arterial or collector street access d. Neighborhood compatibility with apartment development AYES: Commissioners Jeanes, Kelley, Fonzi,Norton, Blaser and Chairman Eddings NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 6:0 by a roll-call vote. 148 MOTION: By Commissioner Fonzi that the PD-7 overlay be applied to properties that can provide a demonstrable public benefit. Motion failed by the lack of a second. POLICY OPTION#4: CREEK SETBACKS Principal Planner Frace provided the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. Chairman Eddings expressed his belief that the creeks in Atascadero could be used as a recreational asset for the city with trails and restaurants with balconies, etc. Mr. Frace responded that this is the reason for different standards for creek setbacks. In the downtown a better urban interface is desirable but without threatening the health and integrity of the creek. Vice-Chairman Jeanes stated that it was important to maintain the integrity of the downtown master plan. She would like to see the creek be pedestrian friendly and feels flexible standards are necessary. However, further out from the downtown she feels larger setbacks must be required. Commissioner Kelley did not feel private homeowners should be penalized with a flexible standard, and he would like to see a practical, uniform standard for creeks. would Commissioner Norton w ld like to see setbacks with teeth in them. She feels standards have been too vague in the past. Vice-Chairman Jeanes inquired about small lots and standard setbacks. Mr. Frace stated that there should be flexibility in areas where one lot may be small and non-conforming, allowing it to build closer to the creek. Larger lots would be held to a larger setback. He suggested that staff could come back with a recommendation that combines several approaches if the Commission feels the issue of creek setbacks should be given consideration. MOTION: By Commissioner Norton to recommend that bulleted item no. 2 should read "A need for setback protection," and to recommend setback standards for each- zoning area be developed to protect blue line creeks. Commissioner Kelley felt that by looking at different zonings, different standards would be developed. He feels that it is the same creek and the same habitat and therefore standards should be uniform. Commissioner Blaser feels that the issue of flexibility must be kept in the recommendation. MOTION: By Commissioner Norton and seconded by Vice-Chairman Jeanes to recommend adoption of Policy Option #4 as follows. Recommended Option 149 2. Recommend that tiered setback standards for each area be developed to protect blueline creeks with special Downtown Master Plan consideration. AYES: Commissioners Norton, Jeanes, Fonzi and Blaser NOES: Commissioner Kelley and Chairman Eddings ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 4:2 by a roll-call vote. POLICY OPTION#5: AFFORDABLE HOUSING Principal Planner Frace provided the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. Option #5A: Affordable Housing Second Units Commissioner Kelley suggested that the Conditional Use Permit process be used during the trial period to allow for public input. Commissioner Norton asked about street repair and parking. Mr. Frace indicated that street repair could be considered as part of the CUP process. Staff is recommending covered off- street parking for guest homes. Commissioner Fonzi felt there should be a time frame for the trial period. MOTION: By Vice-Chairman Jeanes and seconded by Commissioner Fonzi that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council Policy Option #5A for affordable housing on second units to begin with a pilot program and include all of the recommended options as set forth for the public's information which include staff looking at lot size, size restrictions, sewer connection, covered parking, maximum slope, native tree impacts, architectural appearance, setbacks, neighborhood compatibility, and a Conditional Use Permit process, and that the program would also include a timeframe for pilot program review, would eliminate Guest Houses in the SFR-Y land uses and continue to allow Guest Houses in the SFR-X, SFR-Z and SSF land uses. Commissioner Norton requested an amendment to the Motion to include road improvement on the list of recommended options. Chairman Eddings felt that roads should not be included in the Motion, but rather should be dealt with during the Conditional Use Permit process and suggested any road improvements should be limited to the frontage of the parcel to the centerline of the street. 150 MOTION: By Vice-Chairman Jeanes and seconded by Commissioner Fonzi that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council Policy Option #5A as follows: Recommended Options 1. Develop Second Unit standards that address the following: lot size(1 ac min) size restriction sewer connection covered parking maximum slope native trees impacts architectural appearance setbacks neighborhood compatibility Conditional Use Permit approval process 2. Begin with a pilot program to allow second units in the SFR-Y (1 - 1.5 acre lot min) land use with annual program report to the Planning Commission. 3. Eliminate Guest Houses in the SFR-Y land uses. 4. Continue to allow Guest Houses in the SFR-X, SFR-Z and SSF land uses. AYES: Commissioners Jeanes, Fonzi, Kelley,Norton, Blaser and Chairman Eddings. NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 6:0 by a roll-call vote. MOTION: By Commissioner Norton and seconded by Commissioner Blaser to amend the Motion to include roads in the developing of the second unit standards and to limit the road improvement to the front of the property to the centerline of the street. AYES: Commissioners Norton, Blaser, Jeanes NOES: Commissioners Fonzi, Kelley and Chairman Eddings ABSTAIN: None Motion nullified 3:3 by a roll-call vote. Policy Option #5B: Affordable Housing - Mixed Use Multi-Family Residential in Retail District Principal Planner Frace provided the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. MOTION: By Commissioner Kelley and seconded by Commissioner Blaser to recommend adoption of the Policy Option 5B as follows: Recommended Options 1. Allow mixed use multi-family residential projects within the Commercial Retail and Commercial Professional zoning districts as a conditionally allowed use. 2. Require mixed use residential to be attached,multi-family type development. 3. Require all residential projects along Morro Road to include a commercial or office storefront along the street frontage with parking to the rear. 4. Allow exclusive multi-family residential development along El Camino Real. AYES: Commissioners Kelley, Blaser, Fonzi,Norton, Jeanes and Chairman Eddings NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 6:0 by a roll-call vote. Policy Option #5C: Affordable Housing—Multi-Family Density (units vs. bedrooms) Principal Planner Frace provided the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. Chairman Eddings felt that allowing a density of 16 units was too low and suggested a figure of 24 units per acre and maintaining the density bonus for affordable housing as currently written. Commissioner Kelley would like to see the density at 22 units while encouraging the low- income density bonus and an architectural design bonus. 152 MOTION: By Chairman Eddings and seconded by Vice-Chairman Jeanes to recommend adoption of Policy Option#5C as follows: Recommended Options 1. Recommend that multi-family densities be calculated by units rather than bedrooms. 2. Recommend increasing the maximum allowable multi-family density to 22-units/ac in certain areas. AYES: Commissioners Jeanes, Kelley, Fonzi,Norton, Blaser and Chairman Eddings NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 6:0 by a roll-call vote. Policy Option #51): Affordable Housing—Senior Housing Principal Planner Frace provided the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. Chairman Eddings would recommend allowing 26 to 28 deed restricted senior apartments per acre and allow the density bonus and reduce the parking to one parking space per unit with consideration for less if it is along a bus route. Commissioner Fonzi would like a statement as to what specifically the incentive bonus would be. MOTION: By Chairman Eddings and seconded by Commissioner Kelley to recommend the General Plan provide density bonus incentives for deed restricted senior housing development allowing 24 senior units per acre with an additional 25% density bonus for affordable senior housing, with a minimum of one parking space per unit and one guest parking space per five units. AYES: Commissioners Kelley, Jeanes and Chairman Eddings NOES: Commissioners Fonzi,Norton and Blaser ABSTAIN: None Motion nullified 3:3 by a roll-call vote. MOTION: By Vice-Chairman Jeanes and seconded by Commissioner Norton to recommend Policy 5D as follows: 153 Recommended Option 2. Recommend that the General Plan provide a density bonus incentive for deed- restricted senior housing development projects and that staff look into various options for such. AYES: Commissioners Jeanes,Norton, Fonzi, Kelley and Blaser NOES: Chairman Eddings ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 5:1 by a roll-call vote. Policy Option #5E: Affordable Housing—Inclusionary Housing Principal Planner Frace provided the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. MOTION: By Vice-Chairman Jeanes and seconded by Chairman Eddings to recommend Policy Option 5E as follows: Recommended Option 2. Consider the adoption of an inclusionary affordable housing program similar to the City of San Luis Obispo. AYES: Commissioner Jeanes, Blaser,Norton, Kelley, Fonzi and Chairman Eddings NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 6:0 by a roll-call vote. Chairman Eddings called a recess at 9:25 p.m. Chairman Eddings called the meeting back to order at 9:35 p.m. POLICY OPTION #6: SERVICE COMMERCIAL LOCATIONS Principal Planner Frace provided the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. 154 WWI lig %- {1 AYES: Commissioners Jeanes, Kelley,Norton, Blaser, Fonzi and Chairman Eddings NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 6:0 by a roll-call vote. POLICY OPTION #7: UNINCORPORATED AREAS Principal Planner Frace provided the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. Commissioner Fonzi felt that in the future when recommending annexation policies, the emphasis be placed on cost/benefit to the City. MOTION: By Commissioner Blaser and seconded by Commissioner Norton to recommend Policy Option 7 as follows: Recommended Option 6. Area A: Develop Future Annexation Policies 7. Area B: Remote: Leave in County 8. Area C: Developed: Leave in County 9. Area D: 400 undeveloped lots: City Control via Annexation Develop Future Annexation Policies 10. Area E: Developed: Leave in County 156 Unincorporated Colony Areas May 29, 2001 N p1Y cftU.. \ J■4nN■1.=M.li.. OL ■ �e 0 i A / / 0 �I f 1 1. i e t AYES: Commissioners Blaser,Norton, Fonzi, Kelley, Jeanes and Chairman Eddings NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 6:0 by a roll-call vote. POLICY OPTION 98: LOT SIZE INCONSISTENCIES Principal Planner Frace provided the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. 157 Commissioner Norton indicated that in walking many of these lots she has noticed that most have a rural atmosphere, which she feels must be preserved, and she agrees with option no. 3 where the process is applied to individual lots. MOTION: By Commissioner Fonzi and seconded by Vice-Chairman Jeanes to adopt Option No. 8 as follows: Recommended Option 2. Develop a customized Planned Development(PD) overlay process that could be applied to individual lots that are inconsistent with surrounding lots. AYES: Commissioners Fonzi,Jeanes, Kelley,Norton, Blaser and Chairman Eddings NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 6:0 by a roll-call vote. MOTION: By Vice-Chairman Jeanes and seconded by Commissioner Norton to add an additional Policy Option 9 as follows. Recommended Option 2. Review the parking standards for mixed use residential development within the Downtown land use designation as part of the General Plan Update. AYES: Commissioners Jeanes,Norton, Fonzi, Kelley, Blaser and Chairman Eddings NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 6:0 by a roll-call vote. Commissioner Norton expressed concern that there was nothing in the General Plan Update, which addressed historic preservation for the Colony homes that may be affected by the proposed zoning changes. MOTION: By Commissioner Norton and seconded by Commissioner Fonzi to recommend an additional Policy Option 10 as follows: X58 Recommended Option 3. The General Plan will include policies for the historic preservation of Atascadero Colony homes. AYES: Commissioners Norton, Fonzi, Kelley, Blaser, Jeanes and Chairman Eddings NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 6:0 by a roll-call vote. REFINED DRAFT LAND USE PLAN MAP RECOMMENDATION RESOLUTION Principal Planner Frace reviewed the process to date, provided the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. The Commission agreed to deliberate on the map by reviewing specific sub areas one by one. San Benito Area (LUA 11) Commissioner Kelley discussed the lots on Traffic Way and the proposals submitted by the property owners over the last several years. He felt their proposals should be included in the General Plan Update. He recommended one-acre minimums with septic systems. MOTION: By Commissioner Kelley and seconded by Vice-Chairman Jeanes to recommend one-acre minimum lots with septic systems for the area along Traffic Way in the San Benito School area(LUA-11). AYES: Commissioners Kelley, Jeanes, Blaser, Fonzi and Chairman Eddings NOES: Commissioner Norton ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 5:1 by a roll-call vote. Commissioner Fonzi expressed concern regarding loss of the Transient Occupancy Tax if the approved R.V. Park in the current recreation zone at the north end of town goes. North End A discussion ensued regarding the north end zoning changes. The Commission felt that they would like this area at the north end to remain Recreational with access to the proposed . bicycle trail and the de Anza trail and with an adjacent area going to residential. It was decided to separate this area out of the Motion and return to it separately. 159 MOTION: By Commissioner Kelley and seconded by Commissioner Blaser to recommend acceptance of that portion of the North End Draft Land Use Map exclusive of the Rochelle Property area north of Home Depot. AYES: Commissioners Kelley, Blaser,Norton, Fonzi, Jeanes and Chairman Eddings NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 6:0 by a roll-call vote. Rochelle Property MOTION: By Commissioner Kelley and seconded by Chairman Eddings that the property previously zoned for an R.V. Park be changed to Single-Family Residential, 50 unit maximum, and change the designation to Suburban Estate to the south of this area and leave the existing Suburban designation with no change to the other property as indicated on the map, and the bike path to be built along the Mackey parcel as a condition of approval for the zone changes on the other property. AYES: Commissioners Kelley, Jeanes and Chairman Eddings NOES: Commissioners Fonzi,Norton and Blaser ABSTAIN: None Motion nullified 3:3 by a roll-call vote. MOTION: By Commissioner Fonzi and seconded by Commissioner Norton that the property to the north be retained as Recreational zoning and the property south of that between it and Ferrocaril be designated as Suburban Estates. AYES: Commissioners Fonzi, and Norton NOES: Commissioners Blaser, Kelley, Jeanes and Chairman Eddings Motion failed 4:2 by a roll-call vote. MOTION: By Commissioner Kelley and seconded by Chairman Eddings that the R.V. Park be zoned for Single-Family Residential 50 units maximum, change the designation to Suburban Estates for the property to the south of there, leave the existing Suburban designation to the one triangle lot and let the bike path to be built along the Mackey parcel be a condition of approval of the zone change with the developer improving that parcel as seen fit by the City. 160 Commissioner Blaser proposed an amendment to the Motion to provide for equestrian access to the river, which would enable trucks with horse trailers to get to the river. MOTION: By Commissioner Kelley and seconded by Chairman Eddings that the R.V. Park be zoned for Single-Family Residential 50 units maximum, change the designation to Suburban Estates for the property to the south of there, leave the existing Suburban designation on the one triangle lot and let the bike path to be built along the Mackey parcel be a condition of approval of the zone change with the developer improving that parcel as seen fit by the City, and providing equestrian access to the river. AYES: Commissioners Kelley, Blaser, Jeanes and Chairman Eddings NOES: Commissioners Fonzi and Norton ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 4:2 by a roll-call vote. Central Core Commissioner Kelley suggested a change to the map: the lot at Morro Road and Atascadero Avenue (Lot 14), currently zoned Multi-Family, be rezoned to Commercial Professional to make it compatible with surrounding properties. Chairman Eddings indicated that there was a request before the Commission to rezone a lot on Capistrano Avenue to High Density Multi-Family. Principal Planner Frace stated that staff feels the Low Density Multi-Family zoning is appropriate for that site given the slope and oak trees on the property as well as the access to Stadium Park. Commissioner Kelley felt that the request for the change to High Density Multi-Family should be shown on the map. MOTION: By Vice-Chairman Jeanes and seconded by Commissioner Kelley that the Commission recommend to the City Council the refined land use plan in the central area of town as proposed by staff with the change to Office for lot 14 located between Morro Road and Atascadero Avenue. AYES: Commissioners Jeanes, Kelley,Norton, Fonzi, Blaser and Chairman Eddings NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 6:0 by a roll-call vote. 161 Principal Planner Frace asked if the intent of the Motion was to include the recommendation on the Curbaril/El Camino site. Commissioner Jeanes stated that it was. South End MOTION: By Commissioner Kelley and seconded by Commissioner Blaser to accept the South End proposal as is. , AYES: Commissioners Kelley, Blaser, Fonzi,Norton, Jeanes and Chairman Eddings NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 6:0 by a roll-call vote. MOTION: By Vice-Chairman Jeanes and seconded by Chairman Eddings to adopt Resolution 2001-026 with the all of the amendments to the land use map as approved by the Commission. AYES: Commissioners Jeanes, Kelley, Fonzi, Blaser,Norton and Chairman Eddings NOES: None ABSTAIN: None Motion passed 6:0 by a roll-call vote. 162 Attachment 4: Planning Commission Draft Land Use Plan Recommendation RESOLUTION NO. PC 2001-026 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO RECOMMENDING A DRAFT LAND USE PLAN TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR INCORPORATION INTO A DRAFT GENERAL PLAN POLICY DOCUMENT AND DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. GPA 2000-0001 WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero is in the process of updating all elements of the Atascadero General Plan; and, WHEREAS, a Draft Land Use Plan is required as a Preferred Plan for the preparation of a Draft General Plan policy document and for analysis in the Draft Environmental Impact Report; and, WHEREAS, a publicly held Joint Study Session of the City Council and Planning Commission was convened on May 29, 2001 to review the proposed Draft Land Use Plan without taking any action; and, WHEREAS, a public Open House was held on May 30, 2001 to allow public review of the Draft Land Use Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly advertised Public Hearing on June 5, 2001 and June 19, 2001 and considered testimony and reports from staff, and the public. NOW THEREFORE,the Planning Commission does resolve as follows: SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The Planning Commission hereby determines that endorsement of a Draft Land Use Plan for use as the Preferred Plan in a Draft Environmental Impact Report does not constitute a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and that no environmental determination is required at this time; and, SECTION 2. RECOMMENDATION OF ENDORSEMENT: The Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on June 19, 2001, resolved to recommend the Draft Land Use Plan (shown on Exhibit A) to the City Council 163 for use as the Preferred Plan for use in the Draft General Plan policy document and thereon a Draft Environmental Impact Report. On motion by Commissioner Jeans, and seconded by Commissioner Eddings the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Blaser, Eddings, Fonzi, Jeans, Kelley, and Norton ( 6 ) NOES: ( 0 ) ABSENT: ( 0 ) ABSTAIN: ( 0 ) DATE ADOPTED: June 19, 2001 • CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA Royce Eddings Planning Commission Chairperson Attest: Lori Parcells, Director Community Development Department 164 50 units maximum Equestrian access to River t 1 1 required hyjf�aI 11N = o 1 1 1 1 1 �IRISH�i constructed on Mackey FOM Sl f1 1 site wwlew in WMIN WOPO- 50,1 wv •�iN 7b`� a �T � �'�'a��tw. �cdir/ '•: v ail _. s �; • 4/�hi tf ��R ��iT rI r �,ly.n�♦a. � 1yI�,� pisOlkul All, �a� s. Xw 1110 �� :r Cyt •I.il� v SUM wan NN Kim gm �.. ..� � ► �: 1� i � ►� ° �� ,+�t�', _I � � :SII, d �•�,� / /�i �N!c �� , � �,�►�I ��Itlllll IIIII� � �; � y � .��,. � ��i■ til ►11� �:.�,��� �� �' Attachment 5: Draft Council Resolution DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL ENDORSING A DRAFT LAND USE PLAN FOR INCORPORATION INTO A DRAFT GENERAL PLAN POLICY DOCUMENT AND DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. GPA 2000-0001 WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero is in the process of updating all elements of the Atascadero General Plan; and, WHEREAS, a Draft Land Use Plan is required as a Preferred Plan for the preparation of a Draft General Plan policy document and for analysis in the Draft Environmental Impact Report; and, WHEREAS, a publicly held Joint Study Session of the City Council and Planning Commission was convened on May 29, 2001 to review the proposed Draft Land Use Plan without taking any action; and, WHEREAS, a public Open House was held on May 30, 2001 to allow public review of the Draft Land Use Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly advertised Public Hearing on June 5, 2001 and June 19, 2001 and considered testimony and reports from staff, and the public; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission forward its recommendations to the City Council to adopt Draft Land Use Plan and incorporate ten Policy Options into the Draft Land Use Policy document; and, WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a duly advertised Public Hearing on July 24, 2001 and considered public testimony and reports from staff, and the. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council does resolve as follows: SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City Council hereby determines that endorsement of a Draft Land Use Plan for use as the Preferred Plan in a Draft Environmental Impact Report does not constitute a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and that no environmental determination is required at this time; and, 166 SECTION 2. SELECTION OF A PREFERRED LAND USE ALTERNATIVE: The Atascadero City Council, in a regular session assembled on July 24, 2001, resolved to select the Draft Land Use Plan (shown on Exhibit A) for use as the Preferred Plan in the Draft General Plan policy document and thereon a Draft Environmental Impact Report. On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: Mike Arrambide, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney 167 50 units maximum 1 1 1 1 ! 1► Equestrian access to River required Bike path to beconstructed on Mackey site ,�•�� � � �� . _ ����awl� . OAF pang PAW �� 1 ..t• r • •`` r'3 11- P1 �` i�. • ! ���r��owj��i i ��£ ���`'� " +!. !y ■its-�- i S �' _��'. �.�iii, i !i.•� �•♦i . oNy, y��.,�' 10, pr 1 �f �����►j 7 v tr �a • I it .Lill WON OR --. . ► �� 1111111111111111 +� � '`� :►,,,•�� •�,� ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 07/24/2001 e;® ®[a 1818 is Atascadero City Council Staff Report — City Manager's Office Atascadero Youth / Community Center Purchase of Property (5493 Traffic Way) RECOMMENDATION: Council authorize the purchase of real property located at 5493 Traffic Way for the purpose of renovation as a Youth / Community Center, contingent on the receipt of previously allocated State funds. DISCUSSION: The City of Atascadero has been presented with an opportunity to acquire property adjacent to Traffic Way Park, that is well suited to serve as the location for the Atascadero Youth / Community Center. The property in question, located at 5439 Traffic Way, is the current location of the Atascadero Hay and Feed. The 9,800 square foot building located on this property is similar in size and style to facilities previously proposed for construction of a Youth/ Community Center on the grounds of the Traffic Way Corporation Yard. Acquisition of this property at the negotiated purchase price is substantially less than the cost to build a similar building. Staff is requesting that the City Council authorize the purchase of this real property, which will involve a transfer of the property from the current owner, Alice Carroll to the Atascadero Community Services Foundation. The City would then purchase the property from the Foundation. The purchase would be structured so that the Community Services Foundation would purchase the property from Mrs. Carroll for $647,000. Mrs. Carroll will donate $100,000 of the purchase to the Foundation. The City will purchase the property from the Foundation for $547,000 which is the appraised value of the property. Background: The City of Atascadero hired the Architectural firm Hieser and Associates to design a Youth Community Center building to be located on the grounds of the Public Works Corporation Yard. Heiser and Associates have completed the preliminary programming portion of the design effort, essentially gauging the wants and desires of the community related to the development of a Youth Center. No specific design plans have been developed for the Traffic 169 ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 07/24/2001 Way Corporation Yard site. Prior to the initiation of the design plans for this site, the City was approached by the owner of the Atascadero Hay and Feed Property regarding the potential • purchase of this building and property as the future location of the Atascadero Youth / Cornmunity Center. City staff and Architects from Hieser and Associates evaluated the Hay and Feed building and determined that the size, construction style and location of this building are suitable for renovation as the future location of the Atascadero Youth/Community Center. Analysis: Listed below are some advantages and disadvantages of the Hay and Feed building site as the future location of the Atascadero Youth/Community Center. Advantages ■ The location is relatively close to the Skate Park, Junior High and Senior High. It is well suited in the short-term for an after-school Teen Drop-in Center. ■ This site has an existing 9,800 square feet building that is large enough to accommodate a variety of interior improvements and amenities. ■ Improved parking already exists on-site. ■ Creek-side exposure and proximity to Traffic Way Park will allow for the creation of a"park- like setting" around the building. ■ Purchase of this site expands the size of Traffic Way Park and does not take up space currently used for other purposes. ■ State funds that require the use of prevailing wage for construction may be used for acquisition, leaving local funds for the needed facility improvements. ■ A similar facility can not be built for the cost to acquire this property and building. ■ This site is not adjacent to any residences, minimizing potential noise conflicts arising out of events and activities conducted at the facility. ■ Some activities may conducted in this building with minimal improvements. ■ Improvements may be made to the building as funds and donations of labor and materials become available. ■ The capacity exists to provide outdoor facilities such as Skate Park, Outdoor Basketball courts, etc. Disadvantages: ■ The current tenant of the building has a two-year lease. Efforts will be necessary to relocate this tenant in a timely manner. ■ While suitable in size, improvements and renovations will be required prior to use as a Youth /Community Center. ■ May not be compatible with long-term redevelopment plans for the downtown area. ■ The potential for operational efficiency is minimized due to renovating an existing structure. ■ The ability for innovative designs is minimized due to the confines and limitations of the existing facility space. 170 ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 07/24/2001 FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this purchase will require expenditure of$492,000 from a State of California grant for the Atascadero Youth Center and the expenditure of $55,000.00 of the Proposition 12 Per Capita funds allocated to the City of Atascadero. ALTERNATIVES: None ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A- Site Map- 5493 Traffic Way 171 i4•:, my f •�i .e. -� b+v W? '7" ,;-.9 .'�#. R .•, 3 ,4 ^ �� ••��'�,��„�'�� �} ,fid �����" �a r'w. r , y A. y 1 '. ewF,j"'^a. :ter ,•ra .�. a7t'`v �3't:- i4 �.,��, "�.',+�.�,m'•fxP��r�t# 7 ��p� �•-a�`,.�'�,q�.,r.w�'.....g n.a y� rr 9 h � s 5 � t.�•sffi;�, 33 �. 'd W I . u j- �, �, ITEM NUMBER: C- 1 DATE: 07/24/2001 n 1918 1 9 ��1SCADFg�// Atascadero City Council City Manager's Office Information Bulletin A. Ensenada Ave. Traffic Calming The residents of Ensenada Ave. have requested that the City look into traffic calming in their neighborhood. The concern of the residents is a high volume of fast through traffic to the Via Bridge. The Planning Commission has recommended that the City Council identify a feasible solution to the traffic conditions on Ensenada Avenue (see attached Resolution). Police, Fire, Community Development and Public Works staff have visited the neighborhood several times over the last week to review the situation, study the geometric layout of the streets, observe the traffic flow and review mitigation measures. The Police Department has deployed . their traffic trailer to slow down motorists and record the volume and speed of vehicles. A meeting has been set for Wednesday July 18 at 7:00 p.m. at Fire Station#1 to discuss the issue with the residents. Meeting notices have been handed out to residents on Ensenada and all the affected streets. The agenda of the meeting is to receive input from the residents, inform them of current traffic calming techniques and look for potential solutions. Representatives from Police, Fire, Community Development and Public Works will be at the meeting. The information gathered will be used in conjunction with traffic count data and the new traffic model to find a solution. Staff will be bringing this issue, along with a City traffic calming policy, to City Council in the future. B. Census 2000 The City of Atascadero has received notice from the U.S. Census Bureau regarding their Count Question Resolution (CQR) Program which is intended to process challenges to particular official Census 2000 counts brought by state, local or tribal officials of governmental entities. This program extends from 6/30/01 to 9/30/03 and will administer the review of challenges specifically related to governmental unit boundary disputes, geocoding errors, and counts of housing units and group quarters populations. Any challenge must include a complete list of the addresses that are the subject of contention. At this time, the City of Atascadero is not submitting any challenges to the Census 2000 data as no specific addresses or locations have been determined to have been counted erroneously. It should also be noted that no changes will be made to the apportionment or redistricting counts as a result of this program. RESOLUTION NO. PC 2001-030 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL IDENTIFY A FEASIBLE SOLUTION AND TAKE EXPEDITIOUS ACTION TO MITIGATE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ON ENSENADA AVENUE WHEREAS, at the July 3, 2001 Planning Commission meeting several residents of Ensenada Avenue gave testimony during the Public Comments section of the meeting with regard to current traffic conditions on that street; and, WHEREAS, Ensenada residents' testimony indicated that these traffic conditions include excessive speed and volumes of traffic which utilize Ensenada Avenue, shown on Exhibit A, as a short-cut from the Traffic Way area to the downtown; and, WHEREAS, evidence of the tragic accident on June 6, 2001 which gravely injured five-year old Nicholas Begdorf, a resident of Ensenada Avenue, was provided to the Commission; and, WHEREAS, the residents of Ensenada Avenue requested the assistance of the Planning Commission in implementing their suggested traffic mitigation measures including, but not limited to the installation of speed control measures, closure of Ensenada Avenue, and/or a combination of such measures; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero has heard the concerns and recommendations of the Ensenada Avenue residents, and recommends that this issue be thoroughly researched in order to develop an appropriate solution which takes into account public safety, police service and engineering feasibility. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at its regular meeting on July 17, 2001, hereby resolves to recommend that the City Council immediately investigate the development of an appropriate solution which considers public safety, police service and engineering feasibility, and take expeditious action to address the current traffic conditions on Ensenada Avenue. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a- copy of this Resolution be delivered forthwith by the Planning Commission Secretary to the City Council of the City of Atascadero. On motion by Commissioner and seconded by Commissioner the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: 174 ITEM NUMBER: E-1 "%� DATE: 07/24/2001 Isis �s a� Atascadero City Council Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Designation of Voting Delegate - League of California Cities' Annual Conference RECOMMENDATION: Council designate a voting representative and an alternate who will be present at the Annual Business Meeting of the League of California Cities' Annual Conference in September 2001 and direct the City Clerk to inform the League of the designation. DISCUSSION: This year's League of California Cities' Annual .Conference is scheduled for Wednesday, September 12, through Saturday, September 15, 2001 in Sacramento, California. One very important aspect of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting when the membership takes action on conference resolutions. Annual Conference resolutions guide cities and the League in their efforts to improve the quality, responsiveness and vitality of local government in California. Each City Council is asked to designate a voting representative and an alternate who will be present at the Annual Business Meeting. League bylaws provide that each city is entitled to one vote in matters affecting municipal or League policy. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENT: Letter from League dated June 2001 s 176 r LedqUe0f ( 1_ ____ _-alifCities _ 1400 K Street Sacramento,CA 90 916.658.8200 JUN 2 12001 FAX 916.658.8240 www.cacities.org Better Cities—A Better Life CITY OF ATA'S A0ER0 June 2001 To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council From: David Fleming, League President, Mayor, Vacaville Re: Designation of Voting Delegate for League Annual Conference This year's League Annual Conference is scheduled for Wednesday, September 12 through Saturday, September 15, 2001 in Sacramento, CA. One very important aspect of the annual conference is the annual business meeting when the membership takes action on conference resolutions. Annual conference resolutions guide cities and the League in our efforts to improve the quality, responsiveness and vitality of local government in California. It is important that all cities be represented at the annual business meeting on Saturday, September 15, 2001, at 9:15 a.m. at the Sacramento Convention Center. League bylaws state that"Any official of a Member City may, with the approval of the city council, be designated the city's designated voting delegate or alternate delegate to any League meeting. Designated voting delegates (or their alternates) registered to attend the Annual Conference constitute the League's General Assembly." To expedite the conduct of business at this important policy-making meeting, each city council should designate a voting representative and an alternate who will be registered at the conference and present at the annual business meeting. League bylaws provide that each city is entitled to one vote in matters affecting municipal or League policy. A voting card will be given to the city official designated by the city council on the enclosed "Voting Delegate Form." Please complete and return the enclosed "Voting Delegate Form"to the Sacramento office of the League at the earliest possible time (not later than Friday, August 17, 2001), so that t proper records may be established for the conference. The voting delegate may pick up the city's voting card at the designated Voting Card desk located in the League registration area. f The voting procedures to be followed at this conference are printed on the reverse side of this memo. s Your help in returning the attached "Voting Delegate Form" as soon as possible is appreciated. If you have any questions, please call Lorraine Okabe at (916) 658-8236. y 177 League of California Cities Annual Conference Voting Procedures 1. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to League policy. 2. To cast the city's vote a city official must have in his or her possession the city's voting card-and be registered with the Credentials Committee. - 3. Prior to the annual conference, each city should designate a voting delegate and an alternate and return the Voting Delegate Form to the League for use by the Credentials Committee. 4. The voting delegate or alternate may pick up the city's voting card at the annual conference registration area. 5. Free exchange of the voting card between the voting delegate and alternate is permitted. 6. If neither the voting delegate nor alternate is able to attend the annual business meeting, the voting delegate or alternate may pass the voting card to another official from the same city by appearing in person before a representative of the Credentials Committee to make the exchange. Prior to the annual business meeting, exchanges may be made at the annual conference registration area. At the annual business meeting, exchanges may be made at the voting card table located in the front of the meeting room. Exchanges may not be made while a roll call vote is in progress because-the-Credentials Committee will be conducting-41ee-roll call,- - - -- -- - - 7. Qualification of an initiative resolution is judged in part by the validity of signatures. Only the signatures of city officials, who, according to the records of the Credentials Committee, are authorized to use the city's voting card and who have left a sample of their signature on the Credentials Committee register will be approved. 8. In case of dispute, the Credentials Committee will determine the right of a city official to vote at the annual business meeting. G:\policy\acres\voteprox.doc 173 J-s CITY: LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 2001 ANNUAL CONFERENCE VOTING DELEGATE FORM 1. VOTING DELEGATE: (Name) (Title) 2. VOTING ALTERNATE: (Name) (Title) ATTEST: (Name) (Title) Please-complete-and return.to: ; League of California Cities Attn: Lorraine Okabe 1400 K Street Sacramento, CA 95814 tie Fax: (916) 658-8240 Deadline: Friday, August 17, 2001 LO Policy\acres\votedel.ltr