HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 05/09/2000 ■ ., ' NAi AGENDA
1918 1 8
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, MAY 099 2000
7:00 P.M.
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Avenue, 4th Floor
Atascadero, California
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M.
CLOSED SESSION: (Immediately following Redevelopment Agency Meeting)
1. Conference with legal counsel [Govt. Code §54956.9]
Existing litigation:
a. City of Atascadero v Atascadero Unified School District
b. City of Atascadero v Barge
2. Conference with labor negotiator(Govt. Code Sec. 54957.6)
Agency Negotiator: City Manager
Employee organizations: Department Heads, Mid-Management/Professional,
Confidential, Atascadero Fire Captains, Atascadero Firefighters, Service
Employees Intl. Union Local 620, Atascadero Police Assoc.
REGULAR SESSION, 7:00 PM.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Johnson
ROLL CALL: Mayor Johnson
Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide
Council Member Clay
Council Member Luna
Council Member Scalise
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call
PRESENTATIONS:
1. Service recognition for Alfred Clark
2. Employee Service Awards •
COMMUNITY FORUM:
(This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to address the Council on any
matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to
five minutes. Please state your name and address for the record before making your
presentation. The Council may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a
future agenda.)
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENT AND REPORTS:
(On their own initiative, Council Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on
their own activities. Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to
staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. The Council may
take action on items listed on the Agenda.)
A. CONSENT CALENDAR: Roll Call
(All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and non-controversial by
City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Council or public
wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the
item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered in the listed •
sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council
concerning the item before action is taken.)
1. City Council Minutes—April 13, 2000
■ City Clerk recommendation: Council approve the City Council minutes of April 13,
2000 [City Clerk]
2. City Council Minutes—April 25, 2000
■ City Clerk recommendation: Council approve the City Council minutes of April 25,
2000 [City Clerk]
3. Robles Avenue Four Unit PD-7 Overlay—Zone Change 99007 (N.W.C. Robles Avenue
& Sombrilla Avenue/ Shores)
■ Fiscal Impact: Negligible
■ Staff recommendation: Council introduce the Draft Ordinance,for second reading
by title only, to approve Zone Change 99007 [Community& Economic
Development]
4. Authorization to Purchase Transit Vehicle—from State Department of General Services
■ Fiscal Impact: $55,000 (80%funded through a Section 5311 Grant and 20%funded
through TDA funds)
■ Staff recommendation: Council authorize the State Department of General Services
to purchase a 22 passenger accessible bus for the City ofAtascadero[Public Works]
2
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Nuisance Abatement Hearing—3755 Monterey Road (Richardson)—Code Enforcement
Case#99107
■ Fiscal Impact: None
■ Staff recommendation: Council adopt draft Resolution, thereby ordering nuisance
abatement at 3755 Monterey [Community& Economic Development]
2. Nuisance Abatement Hearing 8400 San Gabriel (Maxinne Hill)—Code Enforcement
Case#99039
■ FisCalImpact.: None
■ Staff recommendation: Council adopt draft Resolution, thereby ordering nuisance
abatement at 8400 San Gabriel [Community& Economic Development]
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Strategic Planning
■ Fiscal Impact Individual impacts will be reported with any future recommendation.
Staff recommendation: Council adopt an Atascadero Vision Statement and Action
Plans for the coming year. [City Manager]
2. Proposed 805 Area Code Split or Overlay
■ Fiscal Impact Negative
■ Staff recommendation Council authorize Mayor to send letter to the California
Public Utilities Commission supporting Alternative #IA which would retain the 805
area code in Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo counties. [City Manager]
3. Information Bulletin
A. General Plan Status Report
B. Joint City Council's Meeting
C. Employee Update
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS:
(The following represent standing committees. Informative status reports will be given,
as felt necessary.);
1. S.L.O. Council of Governments/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority
2. Finance Committee
3. Water Committees:
a. SLO County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Water Resources
Advisory Committee
b. Nacimiento Water Purveyors' contract Technical Advisory Committee
C. North County Water forum
4. Integrated Waste Management Authority
5. North County Council
6. Air Pollution Control District
7. County Mayor's Round Table
8. Economic vitality Corporation, Board of Directors
9. City/ Schools Committee
10. Economic Opportunity Commission
11. North County Homeless Coalition
3
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
1. City Council
2. City Attorney
3. City Clerk
a. Appointment of Ex-Officio Youth Representative on the Parks and Recreation
Commission
4. City Treasurer
K
F. ADJOURNMENT:
THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION IS SCHEDULED ON MAY 23, 2000
AT 7:00 P.M.
Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this
Agenda in court, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public
hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or
prior to this public hearing.
4
City of Atascadero
WELCOME TO THE A TASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
GENERAL INFORMATION
The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m.,
in the Council Chamber of City Hall. Matters are considered by the Council in the order of the printed
Agenda.
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the
Agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk(Room 208), and in the Information Office(Room 103),
available for public inspection during City Hall business hours. An agenda packet is also available for
public review at the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in
a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office, (805)
461-5010, or the City Clerk's Office, (805)461-5074. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting
or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can
be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS
Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject,
staff will give their report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when
the public comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding
• the matter being considered to step up to the podium. If you wish to speak for, against or comment in
any way:
• You must approach the podium and be recognized by the Mayor
• Give your name and address(not required)
• Make your statement
• All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council
• All comments limited to 5 minutes (unless changed by the Council)
• No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity
to do so,and no one may speak more than twice on any item.
The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public
comments will be heard by the Council.
TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA
Under Agenda item, "COMMUNITY FORUM", the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience
having business with the Council to:
• Please approach the podium and be recognized
• Give your name and address
• State the nature of your business
This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30
minutes will be allowed for Community Forum (unless changed by the Council).
TO HAVE ITEMS PLACED ON AGENDA
All business matters to appear on the Agenda must be in the Office of the City Manager ten days
preceding the Council meeting. Should you have a matter you wish to bring before the Council, please
mail or bring a written communication to the City Manager's office in City Hall prior to the deadline.
ITEM NUMBER A-1
DATE: 05/09/2000
MINUTES
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
Thursday, April 13, 2000
10:30 a.m.
LEADERSHIP ACADEMY PRESENTATIONS
Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide called the meeting to order at 10:35 a.m. and led the Pledge of
Allegiance.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Council Members Clay, Scalise and Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide
Absent: Council Member Luna and Mayor Johnson
Others Present: City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson
Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Fire Chief Mike McCain, Police Chief
Dennis Hegwood, Community & Economic Development Director Paul
Saldana, Public Works Director Steve Kahn, and Administrative Services
Director Rachelle Rickard.
Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide welcomed the Leadership Academy members to the Council meeting
and introduced the Executive Director of the Atascadero Chamber of Commerce Joanne Main.
He also introduced the President of the Business Improvement Association Kim Jeanes.
City Manager Wade McKinney summarized for the Council what the Academy has experienced.
He explained what type of presentations were going to be given.
LEADERSHIP ACADEMY PRESENTATIONS:
Each of the four teams within the Academy gave their presentations to the Council on an
individual department within the City. They then answered any Council questions.
Police Chief Dennis Hegwood made a surprise announcement that he was promoting Ann
Hochstetler to Support Services Lead Technician.
CC 041300
Page 1 _. -�01,
ITEM NUMBER A 1
DATE: 05/09/2000
GRADUATION:
Mr. McKinney thanked the students for participating in the Academy. The Council Members
assisted Mr. McKinney with the presentation of certificates of completion and Leadership
Academy shirts.
ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide adjourned the meeting at 12:45 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled
meeting on Tuesday, April 25, 2000 at 7:00 p.m.
MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
•
CC 041300002
Page 2
ITEM NUMBER: A-2
DATE: 05/09/2000
i
MINUTES
ion ® ie
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, APRIL 25, 2000
7:00 P.M.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M.
CLOSED SESSION: (Immediately following Redevelopment Agency Meeting)
1. Conference with legal counsel [Govt. Code §54956.9]
Existing litigation:
a. City of Atascadero v Atascadero Unified School District
2. Conference with labor negotiator(Govt. Code Sec. 54957.6)
Agency Negotiator: City Manager
Employee organizations: Department Heads, Mid-Management/Professional,
Confidential, Atascadero Fire Captains, Atascadero Firefighters, Service
Employees Intl. Union Local 620, Atascadero Police Assoc.
City Attorney Roy Hanley announced there was no reportable action in the Closed Session. The
meeting was adjourned at-7:08 p.m. to be continued after the Regular Session.
REGULAR SESSION, 7:00 P.M.:
Mayor Johnson called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. and Council Member Scalise led the
Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Council Members Arrambide, Clay, Luna, Scalise and Mayor Johnson
Absent: None
Others Present: City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson
Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Police Chief Dennis Hegwood, Fire Chief
Mike McCain, Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry, Public Works
Director Steve Kahn, Community and Economic Development Director
Paul Saldana, Principal Planner Warren Frace, and City Attorney Roy
Hanley.
003
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member
Clay to approve the agenda.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
COMMUNITY FORUM:
Hal Carden, 53,55 San Jacinto, expressed his concern with the lack of a crosswalk in front of San
Benito School. He encouraged the Council to actively support the development of safe routes to
school.
Eric Greening, 6600 Lewis Ave., stated he is concerned with the lack of safe pedestrian
pathways from the Lakes project into town.
Mayor Johnson closed the Public Comment period.
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENT AND REPORTS:
Council Member Luna shared a portion of the results of the Foundation for Community Design
survey of cities. He asked the City Clerk to contact the Foundation and request several result
books for public review.
Council Member Clay suggested that a bike path/walkway be put in place alongside the
emergency exit in the Lakes Project. Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide stated that the residents of
River Gardens do not support such a walkway.
Council Member Scalise asked staff to talk to Red Cross Chapter concerning availability of
office space as they are losing their office space in Paso Robles.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. City Council Minutes—April 11, 2000
■ City Clerk recommendation: Council approve the City Council minutes of April 11,
2000 [City Clerk]
2. Weed Abatement Program—Declaring vegetative growth and/or refuse a public nuisance.
■ Fiscal Impact: None; costs involved in administering this program are recovered
through the 100%administrative fee.
■ Staff recommendation: Council adopt the proposed Resolution, declaring vegetative
growth and/or refuse a public nuisance, commencing proceedings for the abatement
of said nuisances, and placing all abatement fees on the San Luis Obispo County
Special Tax Assessment for the fiscal year 2000-2001 Tax Roll. [Fire]
3. Final Parcel Map#98007 AT 98-109—5405 Olmeda Avenue (Pearson/Vaughan
Surveys)
■ Fiscal Impact: None
■ Staff recommendation: Council:
1. Accept the Final Parcel Map #98007; and
CC 04/25/00 {�
Paget V
2. Accept a blanket Public Utility Easement underlying the un-built portions of the
parcel. [Community& Economic Development]
4. Office Furniture Purchase—City Council, City Clerk, City Treasurer, City Attorney and
City Manager's offices.
■ Fiscal Impact: $12,722.14
■ Staff recommendation: Council approve purchase of office furniture from Russco in
the amount of$12, 722.14. [City Manager]
Council Member Luna pulled Item#A-4 for discussion.
MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide and seconded by Council
Member Clay to approve Items #A-1, A-2, and A-3.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
Resolution for Item #A-2 will be #2000-009.
RE: ITEM 9A-4: Council Member Luna stated that he did not feel new furniture for the City
Council is necessary.
Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide asked staff asked which account funds will come from, were the bid
requests of comparable products, and does the price listed include freight charges.
City Manager Wade McKinney responded yes, the bid requests were for comparable products
and yes, the price is the final price with no additions for delivery. He also commented that
although the Council does not use the furniture that often, it would allow the Council someplace
to meet with the public. Mr. McKinney explained that staff has looked into auctioning off some
of the older, well-worn furniture in City Hall to help off-set the costs of this purchase. The
auctioneer would not offer us money but stated they he would charge us to remove the junk we
call furniture. He stated there is not an abundance of useable furniture in City Hall.
Council Member Clay stated that he rarely uses the Council furniture.
Council Member Scalise suggested the Council could use a conference table instead of a desk in
their office.
Mr. McKinney stated that this is an opportunity to be more ceremonial.
PUBLIC COMMENT
John McGoff, 9192 Maple St., expressed his concerns with the bid process used to acquire the
information listed. He questioned why the final purchase price is higher than the lowest bid after
the elimination of several desks and a conference table. Mr. McKinney explained that after staff
determined which company they would use, some equipment was changed: line reduced, and
number of units increased. Mr. McKinney stated that Russco is a GSA bidder. Mr. McGoff
recommended that the Council send this item back for re-bid.
Mayor Johnson closed the Public Comment period.
CC 04/25/00 C-05
Page3
MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide and seconded by Council
Member Scalise to approve Item 4A-4.
Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Luna opposed)
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Robles Avenue Four Unit PD-7 Overlay—Zone Change 99007, Master Plan of
Development (CUP 99022), Tentative Parcel Map 99010 (N.W.C. Robles Avenue &
Sombrilla Avenue/ Shores)
■ Fiscal Impact: Negligible
■ Plapning Commission recommendation: Council:
1. Adopt the Draft Resolution, certifying the proposed Negative Declaration; and,
2. Introduce the Draft Ordinance, for first reading by title only, to approve Zone
Change 99007; and,
3. Adopt the Draft Resolution, approving the Master Plan of Development (CUP
99022) subject to Conditions of Approval; and,
4. Adopt the Draft Resolution, approving Tentative Parcel Map 99010 subject to
Conditions of Approval.
Community and Economic Development Director Paul Saldana gave the staff report and
Principal Planner Warren Frace answered questions of the Council.
There was no Public Comment.
MOTION: By Council Member Scalise and seconded by Council Member
Clay to adopt the Draft Resolution, certifying the proposed
Negative Declaration.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Resolution No. 2000-010)
MOTION: By Council Member Scalise and seconded by Council Member
Clay to introduce the Draft Ordinance,for first reading by title
only, to approve Zone Change 99007.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
MOTION: By Council Member Scalise and seconded by Council Member
Clay to adopt the Draft Resolution, approving the Master Plan
of Development (CUP 99022) subject to Conditions of
Approval.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Resolution No.2000-011)
MOTION: By Council Member Scalise and seconded by Council Member
Clay to adopt the Draft Resolution, approving Tentative Parcel
Map 99010 subject to Conditions of Approval.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. (Resolution No.2000-012)
CC 04/25/00
Page4 V
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Chamber of Commerce Request—for City to participate in the installation of brackets
and banners on a portion of El Camino Real
■ Fiscal Impact: S3,000
■ Staff recommendation: Council authorize the contribution of up to S3,000 for the
installation of brackets and the purchase of 35 banners on a portion of El Camino
Real. [Community Services]
Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry gave the staff report and answered questions of the
Council.
Council Member Clay and Scalise expressed support for this project.
Council Member Luna asked if this has been coordinated with the Main Street Program. Mr.
Saldana stated that there has been some talk but no specifics have been made as they have not yet
created a Master Plan. Council Member Luna expressed concern for having so many City
banners that viewers are distracted from the special event banners. He stated that he would
rather see the money spent on road repairs.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Joanne Main, Executive Director of the Chamber of Commerce, stated she was glad to facilitate
this request for the non-profit organizations such as the Wine Festival Committee, Colony Days
Committee, and the Zoological Society. She explained that they thought it would be best to have
one organization responsible for changing the banners in order to minimize cost for other
committees/organizations and damage to the hardware.
Hal Carden, 5355 San Jacinto, encouraged the Council to support this request as many of these
organizations provide many benefits to the City.
Eric Greening, 6600 Lewis Ave., stated that he supports the idea of banners but is concerned
about placing them all along El Camino Real. He expressed his concern that this would be
overbearing and would be best limited to the downtown area.
Barbie Butz, 3370 San Fernando Road, representative of the Colony Days Committee stated
banners would be an excellent way for the City to advertise all kinds of events.
Mayor Johnson closed the Public Comment period.
Mayor Johnson expressed concern for the impact it will have on the City's maintenance crew
although he does want to support our community groups. He asked where the City is in regard to
the budget. Mr. McKinney responded that the City is expected that its revenue will exceed what
was previously planned for.
Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide stated that he is in support of this proposal.
CC 04/25/00 007.
Pages
MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide and seconded by Council
Member Scalise to authorize the contribution of up to $3,000 for the
installation of brackets and the purchase of 35 banners on a portion of
El Camino Real with the following amendments:
1) The City participate in the installation of the brackets in the spirit
of a community project; and,
2) The fee be waived for the administrative hearing.
Motion passed 4:1 by a roll-call vote. (Luna opposed)
2. Revisions to the Stadium Park Short-Term Rules and Public Use Policies
■ Fiscal Impact: None. The costs would have to be covered by the organizations that
with to use Stadium Park.
■ Staff recommendation: Council adopt draft Resolution, approving the proposed
changes to the Short-Term Park Rules and Public Use Policies originally adopted
with Resolution No. 92-97. [Community Services]
Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry provided the staff report and answered questions of the
Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Barbie Butz, 3370 San Fernando Road, Parks and Recreation Commission Chairman, stated that
the Commission supports having a City-sponsored event for the purpose of identifying potential
problems so they could be solved before other agencies hold events.
Eric Greening, 6600 Lewis Ave., stated he supports the use of Stadium Park for community
events. He also said he agreed with Mrs. Butz on having a City-sponsored event first to help
identify potential problems.
Council Member Clay asked if there could be a designated smoking area.
Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide suggested a sign be posted.
Mayor Johnson stated that he would like to see Mike McCain have a part in the decision making.
Barbie Butz, 3370 San Fernando Road, suggested that the Community Band have a concert as a
trial event.
Eric Greening, 6600 Lewis Ave., stated that it would be wise to see first what would work best
before making plans.
Mayor Johnson closed the Public Comment period.
MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Arrambide to adopt draft Resolution, approving the proposed
changes to the Short-Term Park Rules and Public Use Policies with
the following amendment:
Changing"g" under Policy 3 to read "Portable restrooms are
required for all public assembly events and must be removed as soon
as possible or next business day."
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
CC 04/25/00
Page6 �! fl
3. Request Atascadero State Hospital Consider Leasing Property—for the potential
development of a public park.
■ Fiscal Impact: None at this time.
■ Staff recommendation: Council authorize the Mayor to send correspondence to the
Atascadero State Hospital,formally requesting consideration of a lease agreement
for approximately six acres of State property for use as a public park. [Community
Services]
Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry gave the staff report and answered questions of Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Chris Slater, 4600 San Vicente, President of Atascadero Youth Football, stated they are looking
for a home football field for their organization. He strongly urged the Council to pursue this
potential parkland for the City. Council Member Clay asked if his organization would be willing
to help with the development of a football field if the City acquired this property. Mr. Slater
answered, yes.
MOTION: By Council Member Clay and seconded by Council Member
Luna to authorize the Mayor to send correspondence to the
Atascadero State Hospital, formally requesting consideration of a
lease agreement for approximately six acres of State property for use
as a public park.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
4. Information Bulletin
A. General Plan Status Report
B. Main Street
C. Employee Update
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS:
County Mayor's Round Table
Mayor Johnson reported that they met last week, and the Mayors are proposing a joint meeting
of the City Councils for public awareness of Proposition 8402.
Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors
Mayor Johnson announced that they will meet tomorrow.
Economic Opportunity Commission
Council Member Scalise stated that they are working on a partnership with a private company.
North County Homeless Coalition
Council Member Luna reported that they met a couple of weeks ago. At the meeting it was
stated that there are approximately 600 permanent homeless in the North County, 80% being
women and children. He stated that a smaller group was formed to discuss the problem of
creating a homeless shelter and daycare centers in the North County.
CC 04/25/00 009
Pagel
Ad Hoc Committee—Campaign Sign Issues
Mayor Johnson announced that the Ad Hoc committee for Sign and Code of Ethics met
yesterday. He expects to see a recommendation before the Council after a few more meetings.
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
City Council
Council Member Clay stated that things in general are looking good, and he is excited about it.
Council Member Luna commended the staff for investing in audio/visual equipment and stated
that currently, Atascadero is ranked as number four for public access in the County.
City Clerk
City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson announced that Vice Chairman Clark has submitted his
letter of resignation. She asked for Council direction in acquiring a new commissioner.
There was a Council consensus to have an open recruitment.
F. ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Johnson adjourned the meeting at 9:17 p.m. to the next regular session scheduled on May
09, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. The Council returned to Closed Session.
MEETING RECORDED BY AND MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
Melanie Whaley, Deputy City Clerk
P g0g/25/00 O
K.
ITEM NUMBER: A-3
■ ■'■ ®'■ i DATE: 05/09/2000
iais A i e
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report - Community Development Department
10
Robles Avenue 4-unit Planned Development
Zone Change 99007
(N.W.C. Robles Avenue / Sombrilla Avenue, Shores)
RECOMMENDATION:
Council adopt on second reading by title only,the Draft Ordinance enacting Zone Change 99007,
changing the zoning of the project area shown on Exhibit A from RMF-10 to RMF-10/PD-7.
DISCUSSION:
On April 25, 2000, the City Council conducted a Public Hearing to consider amendment of the
zoning map from Residential Multi-Family 10 (RMF-10) to Residential Multi-Family 10 with a
Planned Development 7 overlay district (RMF-10 / PD-7) concurrently with a corresponding
Master Plan of Development and Tentative Parcel Map. The zone change will allow a four, two-
bedroom single-family residential units to be constructed on separate lots. There were no
changes made by the City Council to the Ordinance during its first reading and it is ready for
final adoption as attached.
FISCAL IMPACT: Negligible
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Rezone 99007 Draft Ordinance
Oil.
Draft Ordinance Second Reading
Rezone 99007
May 9,2000
Attachment 1: Draft Ordinance Approval of Zoning Map Amendment
ZC 99007,TPM 99010
DRAFT ORDINANCE
ANIORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING
ZONE CHANGE 99007 THEREBY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
DISTRICT OF APN 030-011-015 FROM RMF-10 (RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY) TO
RMF-10/PD-7 (RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY WITH A PD-7 OVERLAY
DISTRICT) SUBJECT TO A MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT.
(N.W.C. Robles Avenue & Sombrilla Avenue/ Shores)
WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jimmie D. .Shores (PO Box 216,
Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a zone
change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family) to RMF-10 / PD-7 (Residential Multi-Family
with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and
a 4-lot residential tentative parcel map on APN 030-011-015; and,
WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is LDMF (Low Density Multi-Family); •
and,
WHEREAS, the site's zoning district is RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family); and,
WHEREAS,the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to
enact this amendment to the Zoning Map to protect the health, safety and welfare of its citizens
by applying orderly development of the City; and,
WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of
environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) have been adhered to; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing
on Tuesday, March 21, 2000 to consider the project, at which the Commission referred the item
back to staff for consideration of an affordable housing density bonus; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed
Public Hearing held on April 4, 2000, studied and considered Zone Change 99007, after first
studying and considering the Draft Negative Declaration prepared for the project recommended
the project for approval to the City Council, and,
012
Draft Ordinance Second Reading
Rezone 99007
May 9,2000
WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone Change
application was held by the City Council of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence,
oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Zoning amendments; and,
WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing
held on April 25, 2000, studied and considered Zone Change 99007, after first studying and
considering the,Draft Negative Declaration prepared for the project and the Planning
Commission's recommendation, and,
NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council does ordain as follows:
Section 1. Finding approval of zoning map change.
1. The zone change is consistent with General Plan policies and all other applicable ordinances
and policies of the City.
2. The zone change will not, in itself, result in significant environmental impacts. The Negative
Declaration prepared for the zone change and for the project has been certified as adequate, in
accordance with California environmental laws.
Section 2. Zone map change.
The Official Zoning Map of the City of Atascadero on file in the Community
Development Department is hereby amended as shown on the attached Exhibit A, which
is made part of this ordinance by reference.
Section 3. Publication.
A summary of the ordinance, approved by the City attorney, together with ayes
and noes, shall be published at least five days prior to its final passage in the Atascadero
News, a newspaper published and circulated in said City, and the same shall go into effect
at the expiration of thirty (30) days after its said final passage. A copy of the full text of
this ordinance shall be on file in the City Clerk Office on and after the date following
introduction and passage to print and shall be available to any interested member of the
public.
Section 4. Effective Date.
This ordinance shall be effective a 12:01 a.m. on the 31 st day after its final
passage.
�. 013
Draft Ordinance Second Reading
Rezone 99007
May 9,2000
On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member
the foregoing ordinance is hereby adopted following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
By:
Ray Johnson, Mayor
Attest:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
•
014
Oe
Proposed Zoning District:
RMF-10 PO-7
Its a
mop,, Ron
ITEM NUMBER: A—4
..i MIN °'® DATE: 0.5/09/2000
Y9ia ® 1979
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report - Public Works Department
Purchase of 22 Passenger Accessible Bus through
State Department of General Services
RECOMMENDATION:
Council authorize the State Department of General Services to purchase a 22 passenger
accessible bus for the City of Atascadero.
DISCUSSION:
Background: Each year the State of California Department of General Services solicits bids for a
wide variety of equipment, materials and services. Other governmental agencies are provided
with the results of these bids and allowed to purchase these goods through the state for a service
fee of 1% of the purchase price, to a maximum of$5,000.
Considerable staff time is saved by eliminating the need to prepare specifications, advertise bids
and evaluate results. On average, the City of Atascadero purchases one transit vehicle per year.
Based upon previous purchases, the cost offered by the State is very competitive.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds in the amount of $60,000 are available in the 1999-2000 Public Works Transit Budget.
These funds are the result of an UMTA Section 18 Matching Fund Grant, which was will
reimburse the city up to 80% of the procurement costs for this vehicle. The remaining 20%, will
be funded with Transportation Development Act funds.
After delivery, the vehicle will receive a new radio, farebox and custom painting. The total cost
of the vehicle will remain within the $60,000 budget.
ALTERNATIVES:
Alternative #1 Council may choose not to approve this purchase and direct staff to
prepare documents and advertise for bids.
€ 16
ITEM NUMBER: A-4
DATE: 05/09/2000
Advantages: Potential for receiving lower bid.
Disadvantages: Due to the excellent pricing available from the State of California, the potential
for receiving a lower bid is remote. In addition, considerable staff time is saved
using the state bid process.
Alternative #2 Council may choose not to approve the purchase of a transit vehicle at this time.
Advantages: Cost savings of approximately $10,000 of Transit Development Funds.
Disadvantages: Any cost savings experienced would not be available to the transit system for
other uses. Aging vehicles must be replaced on a regular basis to provide safe,
reliable transit service.
ATTACHMENTS: None
017
ITEM NUMBER: B-1
.0ju.1 ® ■
ia�s ■ a DATE: 05/09/2000
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report - Community Development Department
Nuisance Abatement Hearing
3755 Monterey Road (Richardson)
Code Enforcement Case #99107
RECOMMENDATION:
Council adopt the draft Resolution, thereby ordering nuisance abatement at 3755 Monterey Road.
DISCUSSION:
Background: This property is an approximately 2-acre parcel on Monterey Road adjacent to
Highway 101. The property is zoned for single family residential use (Residential Suburban (RS)
zone) and is currently developed with a mobile home and an attached accessory structure. Between
November 1999 and March 2000 five written code violation complaints have been received in
addition to several other anonymous phone call complaints concerning the property's condition. An
initial inspection of the property was performed in November 1999. The inspection revealed a large
quantity of scrap and refuse stored at the property, visible to highway 101 and adjacent properties. A
courtesy notice was issued December 1, 1999 allowing the property owner fifteen days to pursue
diligent cleanup of the nuisance. On December 16, 1999 a second inspection revealed no cleanup had
occurred. A "First Notice of Nuisance" letter was sent certified mail on December 16, 1999 allowing
the property owner an additional 30 days to diligently pursue cleanup of the property.
The first official notice allows the City to schedule an abatement hearing or issue a citation after
thirty days if the violator does not complete abatement of the nuisance or diligently pursue abatement.
Prior to expiration of the thirty days the property owner contacted Community Development Staff to
request a time extension to clean the property. A time extension was granted to the property owner
allowing an additional 30 days to commence cleaning the property. A third inspection of the property
on February 11, 2000 revealed that some cleanup had occurred and construction had begun on a new
fence. The property owner again asked for a time extension for cleanup. A letter was received from
the property owner by staff on February 15, 2000 asking for an additional six weeks. Staff again
allowed another time extension since some progress was evident on site. The second time extension
allowed an additional three weeks, expiring on March 29, 2000.
Current Situation: On or about April 3, 2000 an inspection of the property found that the majority of
the scrap and refuse was still on the property only moved to different locations to reduce the visibility
018
ITEM NUMBER: B—1
DATE: 05/09/2000
from Highway 101. The property owner has also started building a fence at the property with the
intention of screening the nuisance from Highway 101. If the storage of scrap materials were
completely surrounded by a solid six-foot high fence the storage would still not be allowed in this
single-family residential zone. Accessory storage of this nature would only be allowed within a
designated storage yard within a commercial zone.
On April 6, 2000 second notice of nuisance abatement, scheduling a City Council Hearing to
determine abatement was delivered certified mail to the property owner. The following code
violations were listed in the notice:
1. Atascadero Municipal Code Section 9-6.103 (f)
Excessive outdoor storage of scrap,junk and miscellaneous articles.
The second letter of nuisance abatement sets a hearing before the City Council. At the hearing the
violator is asked to show cause why stated conditions should not be found to be a nuisance and why
the Enforcement Officer should not abate the nuisance. Upon the conclusion of the hearing the
Council may terminate the abatement proceedings or it may order the owner or other affected person
to abate the nuisance prescribing a reasonable time (not less than 30 days for completion of
abatement).
Conclusion: The property at 3755 Monterey Road has been continuously maintained in such a way
as to create a visual nuisance to Highway 101 and surrounding neighbors within the City of
Atascadero. Previous attempts to encourage the property owner to maintain the property within City
Codes have made little impact on the property condition. If Council adopts the attached resolution the
property owner is ordered to commence cleanup within 30 days. If the property owner fails to
commence the cleanup within the specified time period, the enforcement officer will be empowered
and authorized to abate the nuisances at the property. This procedure will allow the City Council to
attach any abatement costs to the tax rolls of the property.
ALTERNATIVES:
The Municipal Code, Section 9-8. 107, outlines the procedures and options available for nuisance
abatement:
1. The Council has the option to terminate the abatement proceedings if the violator shows sufficient
reason why the reported conditions should not be found to be a nuisance and why the nuisance
should not be abated by the enforcement officer.
2. The Council has the option of extending the time allowed for nuisance abatement beyond the
recommended 30 days.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1: Zoning Map/location map
Attachment 2: Site Photo
Attachment 3: Nuisance Letter December, 1999
Attachment 4: Letter from property owner, February 15, 1999.
Attachment 5: Draft Resolution
019
ATTACHMENT 1:Zoning Map/ !on ap
CASE#ENIF 99039
000
p.
�t���.�.- �b� _ ��� 111►•� ��������'a�� ���� ��
list
o ■ .-:
�►��li:lw,r-, sillf
r •� :►! ����,�. ..111 3� '�
elk� a 201 �i^'�� � �O►�o' ■�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
�.� � : ( � .,,►��1c�G�.�r1 'eft � � �r�����1
Fill �■■ty ■��■nu , .�..
3755
M�..
1�
MontereyRod•
•
r
-
s
t -
�-4
41 t
i
ATTACHMENT 3: Nuisance Letter, December, 1999
3755 Monterey Road
CASE#ENF 99107
MAY 9,2000
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
FIRST NOTICE OF NUISANCE
Delivered 12/16/99
1211611999
Richardson
3755 Monterey Road
Atascadero,CA 93422
APN#049-221-064
SUBJECT:
Dear Mr.Richardson:
The Code Enforcement Officer has performed a second review of the above referenced property on 1211 S/1999. A
courtesy notice of code violation was issued on 12/1/199 allowing you two weeks to abate the nuisances. As of
12/15/1999, your property still contains the following violations of the Atascadero Municipal Code, which
constitute a nuisance:
1. Section 9-6.103 (a) of the Municipal Code requires that construction materials be stored only on a site in
which a valid building permit is in effect for construction on the premises.Your property has a large quantity
of construction materials stored on-site while no valid permits for construction are on site or adjacent to the
site.
2. Section 9-6.103 (f)of the Municipal Code states that"The outdoor storage of scrap,junk and miscellaneous
articles and materials accessory to another use is limited to a maximum area of 200 square feet, with a
maximum height of f ve feet unless such storage is entirely within a six foot high solid wood or masonryfence
or within a building. Such storage shall be located only where it is within the buildable area of the lot."
(please note:the"buildable area"of the lot is all areas within the property setback measured from the property
lines,which is: Five(5)feet on the sides,Ten(10) feet at the rear and Twenty Five Feet(25')at the front of
the property.).Your property has a large unspecified quantity of outdoor storage of items well in excess of 200
square feet and within the setback areas.
Please consider this letter a First Official Notice of Nuisance,per Atascadero Municipal Code Section 9-8.107(a).
You are required to commence and complete the abatement of the nuisance within thirty(30)days from the receipt
of this notice. The following steps should be taken in order to abate the nuisance: 1) the outdoor storage of all
construction materials, scrap, and junk must be limited to an area no larger than 200 square feet and a height of
five feet,all other related materials shall either be stored within a building or removed from the site.
If the required abatement is not completed within(30)days,the City will have the following options:
1. Prosecute the violations as a misdemeanor,pursuant to the Atascadero Municipal Code;and/or
2. Set a City Council Hearing date to seek abatement order and levy a special assessment.At the public hearing
the property owner has the opportunity to discuss the violation with the City Council and staff.If abatement is
necessary the Council may order a third posting giving at least 30 days to abate the condition.If the condition
is not abated within this time,the enforcement officer would then be set before the City Council to determine
the costs to be applied to the tax roles of the property.
The City of Atascadero has now posted your property. The notice is dated 1211611999, this allows you until
111611999 to abate the condition, or diligently pursue the abatement. At that date City Staff will review the site
and,if necessary,set a public hearing before the City Council.
If you have any questions regarding this matter please feel free to contact the Code enforcement officer at the City
of Atascadero Community Development Department.
Sincerely,
02
Code Enforcement Officer/Assistant Planner
ATTACHMENT 4: Letter from Property Owner February 15,2000
3755 Monterey Road
CASE#ENF 9910
MAY 9,200
3755 Monterey Road
Atascadero CA 93422
February 15,2000
TO: PHILIP DUNSMORE
Assistant Planner
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero,CA 93422
FROM: BENNING A.RICHARDSON
3755 Monterey Road
Atascadero,CA 93422-2430.
RE: Request for Continuance
Dear Mr.Dunsmore:
This letter will confirm our meeting of February 11,2000,and your request that any
continuance be in writing with a plan for bringing the above property into compliance with your
letter of January 19,2000.
As you know,during the last several weeks,the northeastern portion of the property
contiguous to the 101 Freeway has been fenced which obstructs the.view of the lower portion of
the property. This fence is approximately 110 feet in length with an additional 25 feet presently
under construction.
In addition to the above,two 8'X 15'storage sheds are under construction in the lower
portion of the northeastern comer of the property. They will be attached to the above described
fence by another fence approximately 60 feet in length. All the Redwood lumber, screens,glass,
and material presently visible,will either be stored in them or behind the attached fence and out
of sight to the neighbors on either side of the property.
Further,on the upper level, doors will be installed to the front entrance to the carport
and everything visible from Monterey Road will either be behind the carport area or behind the
fenced area described above.
As you know,almost a third of the last several weeks have resulted in rain delays. There
have been good faith efforts made and substantial compliance with your letter of January 19,
2000,exists except for the above plan. Very little is visible from the 101 Freeway. Therefore,
good cause exists for the granting of an additional six-week continuance. This would enable me
not only to comply with your letter of January 19,2000,but to make the property more aesthetic
for everyone.
If you have any questions please contact me at 462-2616.
Yours truly,
1
BENNING A-RI SON0
C1'123
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolution
3755 Monterey
CASE#ENF 99107
MAY 9,2000
DRAFT RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF ATASCADERO
ORDERING NUISANCE ABATEMENT
AT 3755 MONTEREY ROAD ATASCADERO
(Code Enforcement Case#99107)
WHEREAS, a first notice of nuisance abatement was served and posted on
December 16, 1999 pursuant to Atascadero Municipal Code Section 9-8.107 (a); and
WHEREAS, the nuisance has not been abated, nor diligently pursued within the
time period specified in the Courtesy Notice; and
WHEREAS, the nuisance has not been abated, nor diligently pursued within the
time period specified in the First Notice of Nuisance; and
WHEREAS, the nuisance has not been abated, nor diligently pursued within the
time period specified in the Second Notice of Nuisance; and
WHEREAS, a second notice of nuisance abatement has been served on April 6,
2000 pursuant to Atascadero Municipal Code Section 9-8.107 (b) ; and
WHEREAS; the City Council conducted a duly scheduled public hearing on the
reported nuisances at 3755 Monterey and considered testimony and reports from staff, the
violator, and the public; and
WHEREAS; the above referenced hearing was conducted pursuant to Atascadero
Municipal Code Section 9-8.107 (c), and the City Council determined not to terminate the
abatement proceedings, but instead to order abatement of the nuisances existing at 3755
Monterey Road, California.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero orders
abatement of reported nuisances at 3755 Monterey Road. The owner and or other affected
persons are ordered to abate the nuisances within 30 days. These nuisances include the
following:
1. Atascadero Municipal Code Section 9-6.103 (f)
Excessive outdoor storage of scrap,junk and miscellaneous articles.
In the event that abatement is not commenced, conducted and completed within 30 days,
024
DRAFT Council Resolution
3755 Monterey
Page 2
the enforcement officer is empowered and authorized to abate the nuisances. The
enforcement officer is empowered, authorized and directed to cause any costs of abatement
to become assessed against the real property being abated pursuant to Atascadero
Municipal Code Section 9-8.107 (a)through(i), inclusive.
On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA
Ray Johnson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Marcia M. Torgerson, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
C25
ITEM NUMBER: B-2
dais � 5_79DATE: 05/09/2000
CAD��
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report - Community Development Department
Nuisance Abatement Hearing
8400 San Gabriel (Maxinne Hill)
Code Enforcement Case #99039
RECOMMENDATION:
Council adopt the draft Resolution, thereby ordering nuisance abatement at 8400 San Gabriel.
DISCUSSION:
Background: This property is an approximately 3-acre lot immediately adjacent to San Gabriel
Elementary on San Gabriel Road. The property is zoned for single family residential use (Residential
Suburban (RS) zone) and is currently developed with a single-family residence, a barn and several
abandoned accessory structures. A code enforcement complaint was received on April 21, 1999,
reporting excessive storage and abandoned vehicles at the property. An inspection of the property
was performed on May 7, 1999. The inspection revealed an extraordinary amount of outdoor storage
in view of San Gabriel Road and San Gabriel Elementary School. Storage was found to include
several non-operational vehicles, construction materials and miscellaneous articles. The property
owners were consulted and given a courtesy notice of nuisance abatement. On May 24, 1999,
following a second inspection and no compliance, the property owners were given a first "Official
Notice of Nuisance Abatement" by certified mail. The first official notice allows the City to schedule
an abatement hearing or issue a citation after thirty days if the violator does not complete abatement
of the nuisance or diligently pursue abatement.
A third inspection of the property on June 30, 1999 revealed that some cleanup had occurred. When a
property owner shows due diligence in cleanup, city staff does not seek further enforcement, however
the case is not closed until the nuisance is completely abated. Over the next several months routine
inspections of the property revealed that the property condition was gradually improving. Staff was
still unable to close the case since excessive storage was still occurring, however additional
enforcement was not pursued since staff felt that the property owner was diligently seeking
compliance.
026
ITEM NUMBER: B—2
DATE: 05/09/2000
Current Situation: On or about March 15, 2000 a new code complaint was received by staff
concerning the property condition at 8400 San Gabriel. A site inspection revealed code violations
including, excessive storage of junk and scrap, abandoned vehicles, and an unsanitary living
environment. The property had returned to its original state as first reported in April, 1999. Since the
original code enforcement case had not been closed a second letter of Nuisance Abatement was
delivered, certified mail. The following code violations were listed in the notice:
1. Atascadero Municipal Code Section 9-6.103(c)(3)
Excessive storage of inoperative vehicles
2. Atascadero Municipal Code Section 9-6.103 (f)
Excessive outdoor storage of scrap,junk and miscellaneous articles.
The second letter of nuisance abatement sets a hearing before the City Council. At the hearing the
violator is asked to show cause why stated conditions should not be found to be a nuisance and why
the Enforcement Officer should not abate the nuisance. Upon the conclusion of the hearing the
Council may terminate the abatement proceedings or it may order the owner or other affected person
to abate the nuisance prescribing a reasonable time (not less than 30 days for completion of
abatement).
Conclusion: The property at 8400 San Gabriel Road has been continuously maintained in such a
way as to create a health hazard and a visual nuisance to surrounding neighbors within the City of
Atascadero. Previous attempts to encourage the property owner to maintain the property within city
codes have made little impact on the property condition. If Council adopts the attached Resolution the
property owner will be ordered to abate all nuisances at the property within 30 days. If the property is
not abated within the specified time limits, the enforcement officer will be empowered and authorized
to abate the nuisances at the property. This procedure will allow the City to attach any abatement
costs to the tax rolls of the property.
ALTERNATIVES:
The Municipal Code, Section 9-8. 107, outlines the procedures and options available for nuisance
abatement:
1. The Council has the option to terminate the abatement proceedings if the violator shows sufficient
reason why the reported conditions should not be found to be a nuisance and why the nuisance
should not be abated by the enforcement officer.
2. The Council has the option of extending the time allowed for nuisance abatement beyond the
recommended 30 days.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1: Zoning Map/location map
Attachment 2: Site Photos
Attachment 3: Nuisance Letter April, 1999
Attachment 4: Draft Resolution
Uzi
ATTACHMENT 1:Zoning Map/Location ap
CASE#ENF 99039
000
�� V g
"� :lam_ ♦ s '•.
g- mow
. �-
�. Awful
San. Gabriel . .
�1
.
8400 Gabriel �.�
8400 San Gabriel Road
� � -
� � �
., a.
,, ��
�, �� _
� ` iM L`ti:r-Y >
r ;�, ����,� � ����
F -hY A.--.
�2
�. i
jj{ 1
.� ■i i�
�® ,.■ '. � � �. � �,� a. \•� -�e"�� e a' �9 • sit
�. -
�_ �� �'�'
s _,. _. -
� — � i d�
l ,��. ,.,.x� ^ t�°
__ _ _ _^ _
_ .� �_ , ,—� ,a,,R—�- -2
,_, - �
�.
f
�,�,
r_> - _
_- � �:� _ -
,�3 -_ ¢
� _ � _ _ _ -
;- ., r_
i
. .
- _ �;.
,�F ' �, ��
,•,,
- ,;
t tr..,�, 'k..t c'�
E � ,��
�. a
�,�
�'`- ��..
{
p ��� ��r
4
4'
�°'4, -
,;
.��_ — - _i
__
- �- �_ �
_:-
_ , ,
� �q�
r �ti �
,� Y � _
� — � 9
j+(
` t
___ .,_.�
_..: -. .-a--a
_ _ _ -T.--
� __.__f
�_ r
��
2'� .�.— .___—.
_ �_ �=_
- ��-'2—
� � ` e �
ATTACHMENT 3:Abatement Letter, May, 1999
8400 San Gabriel
CASE#ENF 99039
MAY 9, 2000.CITY OF ATASCADERO
CAD
FYRST NOTICE OF NUISANCE
Delivered 5/24/99
512411999
i
Maxinne Hill
8400 San Gabriel Road
Atascadero,CA 93422
APN#054-241-022
SUBJECT:
Dear Mrs.Hill:
The Code Enforcement Officer has reviewed the above referenced property on 51711999.The following violations
of the Atascadero Municipal Code,which constitute a nuisance,exist on the site:
1. Section 9-6.103 (a)of the Municipal Code requires that construction materials be stored only on a site in
which a valid building permit is in effect for construction on the premises.Your property has a large quantity
of construction materials stored on-site while no valid permits for construction are on site or adjacent to the
site.
2. Section 9-6.103(b)of the Municipal Code allows only one commercial vehicle to be stored in a residential
zone and only in a manner that will not be disturbing to nearby residences as a result of unsightly appearance.
Your property has two large commercial vehicles,and a commercial backhoe stored on site,in view of the
street and adjacent school.
3. Section 9-6.103(f)of the Municipal Code states that"The outdoor storage of scrap,junk and miscellaneous
articles and materials accessory to another use is limited to a maximum area of 100 square feet, with a
maximum height of five feet unless such storage is entirely within a six foot high solid wood or masonryfence
or within a building. Such storage shall be located only where it is within the buildable area of the lot."
(please note:the"buildable area"of the lot is all areas within the property setback measured from the property
lines,which is:Five(5)feet on the sides,Ten(10)feet at the rear and Twenty Five Feet(25')at the front of
the property.).Your property has a large unspecified quantity of outdoor storage of items well in excess of 200
square feet and within the setback areas.
Please consider this letter a First Notice of Nuisance,per Atascadero Municipal Code Section 9-8.107(a).You are
required to commence and complete the abatement of the nuisance within thirty(30)days from the receipt of this
notice. The following steps should be taken in order to abate the nuisance: 1) the outdoor storage of all
construction materials,scrap,and junk must be limited to an area no larger than 200 square feet and a height of
five feet,all other related materials shall either be stored within a building or removed from the site.2)Storage of
r
large commercial vehicles must be limited to a maximum of one vehicle,and vehicle shall be parked in a location
not immediately visible from the public roadway or adjacent school.
If the required abatement is not completed within(30)days,the City will have the following options:
1. Prosecute the violations as a misdemeanor,pursuant to the Atascadero Municipal Code;and/or
2. Set a City Council Hearing date to seek abatement order and levy a special assessment.At the public hearing
the property owner has the opportunity to discuss the violation with the City Council and staff.If abatement is
necessary the Council may order a third posting giving at least 30 days to abate the condition.If the condition
is not abated within this time,the enforcement officer would then be set before the City Council to determine
the costs to be applied to the tar roles of the property.
The City of Atascadero has now posted your property. The notice is dated 512411999, this allows you until
612411999 to abate the condition,or diligently pursue the abatement.At that date City Staff will review the site
and,if necessary,set a public hearing before the City Council.
If you have any questions regarding this matter please feel free to contact the Code enforcement officer at the City
of Atascadero Community Development Department.
Sincerely,
D ,a --moi
Code Enforcement Officer/Assistant Planner
City of Atascadero
ATTACHMENT 4: Draft Resolution
8400 SAN GABRIEL
MAY 9,2000
DRAFT RESOLUTION
.A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF ATASCADERO
ORDERING NUISANCE ABATEMENT AT 8400 SAN GABRIEL ROAD ATASCADERO
(Code Enforcement Case# 99039)
WHEREAS, a first notice of nuisance abatement was served and posted on May
24, 1999 pursuant to Atascadero Municipal Code Section 9-8.107 (a); and
WHEREAS, the nuisance has not been abated, nor diligently pursued within the
time period specified in the First Notice of Nuisance; and
WHEREAS, a second notice of nuisance abatement has been served on April 6,
2000 pursuant to Atascadero Municipal Code Section 9-8.107 (b) ; and
WHEREAS, the nuisance has not been abated, nor diligently pursued within the
time period specified in the Second Notice of Nuisance; and
WHEREAS; the City Council conducted a duly scheduled public hearing on the
reported nuisances at 8400 San Gabriel and considered testimony and reports from staff,
the violator, and the public; and
WHEREAS; the above referenced hearing was conducted pursuant to Atascadero
Municipal Code Section 9-8.107 (c), and the City Council determined not to terminate the
abatement proceedings, but instead to order abatement of the nuisances existing at 8400
San Gabriel, California.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero orders
abatement of reported nuisances at 8400 San Gabriel. The owner and or other affected
persons are ordered to abate the nuisances within 30 days. These nuisances include the
following:
1. Atascadero Municipal Code Section 9-6.103(c)(3)
Excessive Storage of inoperative vehicles.
2. Atascadero Municipal Code Section 9-6.103 (1)
Excessive outdoor storage of scrap,junk and miscellaneous articles.
In the event that abatement is not commenced, conducted and completed within 30 days of
the adoption of this Resolution,the enforcement officer is empowered and authorized to
abate the nuisances. The enforcement officer is empowered, authorized and directed to
031
DRAFT Council Resolution
8400 San Gabriel
Page 2
cause any costs of abatement to become assessed against the real property being abated
pursuant to Atascadero Municipal Code Section 9-8.107 (a)through(i), inclusive.
a
1. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the
On motion by Council Member and seconded by Council Member
the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA
Ray Johnson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
ITEM NUMBER: C- 1
DATE: 05/09/2000
:a
1918 ® 19 9
i
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report- City Manager's Office
Strategic Planning
RECOMMENDATION:
Council adopt an Atascadero Vision statement and action plans for the coming year.
DISCUSSION:
Background: The City Council initiated a Strategic Planning approach to the City operations in
1997. The Council participated in a goal-setting workshop outlining the priority issues facing
Atascadero early in 1997. Following the appointment of a new City Manager August 1997, one
of the identified goals, the Council and the new Manager participated in a one-day workshop. In
early 1998 the Council and Manager participated in a Strategic Planning workshop facilitated by
David Jones. In this workshop the Council began to articulate a vision for Atascadero and
establish priorities to guide the operating departments. This was the first time Council priorities
were the foundation of the Annual Operating Budget. The Council made a commitment to
annually update and revise the City's Strategic Plan.
The 1999 Strategic Planning Workshop was different than the first year in that it was facilitated
by the City Manager and included presentations by each of the operating departments. The City
Manager filled a dual role, both as a participant and facilitator. Again in 2000 the City Manager
facilitated the workshop. In 2000 the process was expanded to encompass the community survey
and the Atascadero Leadership Academy. The Council established a broad Vision statement and
identified top priorities for the organization.
Vision
The Council reviewed Vision statements from prior years to insure a common understanding and
refine the Council's Vision. The Vision defined by the Council is included in Attachment `A'.
Department Heads and the Leadership Academy have suggested additional Vision statements for
Council's review, these statements are depicted on Attachment `B'. The list includes a reference
to the 40 Developmental Assets published by the Search Institute. This is a new program
beginning in San Luis Obispo County and the Atascadero Youth Task Force is excited about the
opportunities it brings. The Assets are statements, as can be seen in the attachment, generally
considered present in a healthy community. They are much like a Vision statement in that they
set goals for the community with respect to raising our youth. The Assets cover the topics of
ITEM NUMBER: C- I
DATE: 05/09/2000
support, empowerment, boundaries and expectations, constructive use of time, commitment to
learning, positive values, social competencies and positive identity. The Council should review
these and determine if they should be added to the Council's list.
Action Plans
The City Council identified priority issues for the City organization based on the community
survey and the Council Vision. Those issues were:
❑ Roads
❑ Youth/Community Center
❑ Downtown
❑ Economic Development
❑ General Plan
❑ Community Involvement
❑ Code Enforcement/Neighborhood Preservation
❑ Funding City Services
❑ Growth Mitigation Program
The Department Heads and the Leadership Academy have developed action plans for each of the
priorities. In addition the Leadership Academy developed action plans for a conference center, a
dedicated grants writer, and high tech business promotion.
All of the action plans are in Attachment "C" including those added by the Leadership Academy.
The Council should review the plans and make any changes necessary. The Council could add
the action plans developed by the Academy, otherwise these issues will not be treated as priority
in the budget.
These action plans will be used to target budget priorities for next year.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Individual impacts will be reported with an future recommendation.
p P Y
ALTERNATIVES:
Council could revise the vision statement and action plans.
ATTACHMENTS:
A - City Council Vision
B - Vision Statements of Department Heads and Leadership Academy
C - Action Plans 034
Strategic Planning
Attachment A
Council's Vision for Atascadero - 2000
■ The Lake Park is a local and regional activity center.
■ The City Hall and Sunken Gardens are social and historical amenities.
■ The Zoo as an educational and recreational attraction of the regional community.
■ The Library as a cultural and educational resource of the community.
■ Facilitate plays, music, dance, etc. through public/non-profit/private partnerships.
■ Parks and facilities that are attractive, well maintained and meet community needs.
■ School District and City work together to provide improved services to the community.
■ Recreational services that are financially appropriate.
■ Council and community agree on service levels with an economy to support those levels.
■ Elected officials and City staff work to serve the entire community.
■ Attitude in government to only spend with a realistic plan.
■ Revenues sufficient to fund our City services
■ Insure General Plan is internally consistent.
■ Diversified housing mix: entry level, mid-level, high-end while preserving natural amenities.
■ Maintain rural atmosphere distinguishable from other cities within our oak forest.
■ Have a quality of life where people want to live/work.
■ Highway 101 corridor visually attractive.
■ Protect natural environment.
■ Encourage events that celebrate our community assets.
■ Large lots is the dominant residential style
■ Expanded view of"community" to mean more than my backyard.
■ Crime-free neighborhoods.
■ Downtown is a pedestrian friendly area: stores, ice cream shops, antique shops, restaurants
etc., with seating in park areas. Community events are held Downtown.
■ Downtown is consistently planned to reflect the community character.
■ Roads in good shape.
■ Infrastructure in good shape.
■ Atascadero supports its youth through a broad range of wholesome activities.
■ Consider educational needs of youth.
■ Provide job opportunities for youth.
■ Safe bicycle and pedestrian circulation.
■ Encouraging businesses that provide jobs that provide "wage earner" salaries that allow
youth to stay in community.
■ Retain and recruit clean, attractive and planned range of businesses that accommodate all
community labor backgrounds.
■ Expand non-polluting industrial development to supply jobs.
■ The City financially stable—reserves in good shape.
■ Develop a healthy diversified tax base.
■ Recruitment of volunteers to expand City services.
■ Swimming complex
■ Develop a plan for public use.for Stadium Park.
■ Continued contact and input from the broadest possible population.
■ A viable General Plan.
Strategic Planning
Attachment B
Vision Statements
❑ The Fire Department will be well organized and equipped to prevent and
mitigate fire hazards, and provide public education.
❑ The City will be top quality professional organization with policies,
programs and procedures to achieve maximum personnel and
departmental performances.
❑ The Public Safety Departments will respond safely to all emergencies
with adequate personnel and equipment necessary to provide appropriate
service within allowable time parameters.
❑ The City will provide a comprehensive training for the purpose of
maintaining the highest levels of performance in the services provided.
❑ The City will insure that all equipment is in the highest state of readiness
as dictated by the various service centers.
❑ An active Main Street Program will be in place.
❑ The City organization will fully implement the Police Department's
Community Action Partnership (CAP) Program to include all City
departments.
❑ The City will enhance its community outreach activities through
professional customer service and verifiable performance measures.
❑ The Community will embrace and continually improve the forty (40)
Developmental Assets identified by the Search Institute.
036
4Developmental0
Assets
Search Institute has identified the following building blocks of healthy development that help young people grow up
healthy,caring,and responsible.Percentages of young people who experience each asset represent almost 100,000
6th-to 12th-grade youth surveyed in 213 towns and cities in the United States.
ASSET TYPE ASSET NAME AND DEFINITION
Support 1. Familysupport-Family life provides high levels of love and support. 64%
r; 2. Positive family communication-Young person and her or his parent(s)communicate 26%
positively,and young person is willing to seek advice and counsel from parent(s).
k 3. Other adult relationships Noung person receives support from three or more 41%
nonparent adults.
+y 4. Caring neighhorhood-Young person experiences caring neighbors. 40%
5. Caring school climate-School provides a caring,encouraging environment. 24%
C 6. Parent involvement in schooling-Parent(s)are actively involved in helping young 29%
.. person succeed in school.
^' Empowerment 7. Community values youth-Young person perceives that adults in the community value youth. 20%
Z 8. Youth as resources-Young people are given useful roles in the community. 24%
9. Service to others-Young person serves in the community one hour or more per week. 50%
> 10. Safety-Young person feels safe at home,school,and in the nei6k6oAood. 55%
Boundaries and 11. Family boundaries-Family has clear rules and consequences and monitors the young 43%
r Expectations person's whereabouts.
12. School 6oundaries-School provides clear rules and consequences. 46%
13. Neighhorhood boundaries-Neigh6ors take responsibility for monitoring young 46%i people's behavior.
14. Adult role models-Parent(s)and other adults model positive,responsible behavior. 27%
71 15. Positive peer influence-Young person's best friends model responsible behavior. 60°6
16. High expectations-Both parent(s)and teachers encourage the young person to do well. 4196
C/
Constructive 17. Creative activities-young person spends t ree or more hours per week in lessons or 19%
_ Use of Time practice in music,theater,or other arts.
18. Youth programs Young person spends three or more hours per week in sports,clubs. 59%
or organizations at school and/or in the community.
19. Religious community-Young person spends one or more hours per week in activities g4%
in u religious institution.
20. Time at home-Young person is out with friends with nothing special to do"two or 50%
lever nights per week.
Commitment 21. Achievement motivation-Young person is motivated to do well in school. 63%
to Learning 22. School engagement-Young person is actively engaged in learning. 6496
23. Homew,orh-Young person reports doing at least one hour of homework every school day. 45%
24. Bonding to school-Young person cares about her or his school. 5186
25. Reading for pleasure-Young person reads for pleasure three or more hours per week. 24°6
Positive Values 26. Caring-young person places kigk value on kelping other people. 43%
27. Equalitv and social justice-Young person places kigh value on promoting equality and 45%
reducing hunger and poverty.
28. Integrity-Young person acts on convictions and stands up for her or his beliefs. 63%
29. Honesty-Noung person"tells the truth even when it is not easy." 63%
30. Responsibility-Young person accepts and takes personal responsibility. 60%
31. Restraint-Young person believes it is important not to be sexually active or to use 42%
alcohol or other drugs.
Social 32. Planning and decision mahing-Young person knows how to plan ahead and make choices. 29%
Competencies 33. Interpersonal competence-Young person has empathy,sensitivity,and friendship skills. 43%
34. Cultural competence-Young person has knowledge of and comfort with people of 35%
different cultural/racial/ethnic backgrounds.
35. Resistance skills-Young person can resist negative peer pressure and dangerous situations. 37%
36. Peaceful conflict resolution Young person seeks to resolve conflict nonviolently. 44%
Positive Identity 37. Personal power-Young person feels he or she has control over"things that happen to me." 45%
38. Sell-esteem-Young person reports having a high self-esteem. 47%
39. Sense of purpose-Young person reports that"my life has a purpose." 55%
40. Positive view of personal future-Young person is optimistic about her or his personal future. 70%
This cart may be reproduced for educational,noncommerciul uses only.
Copyright c 1997 b}'Seurch Institute.700 S.Third Street,Suite'210.i•linneupolis,NIN 53+15:phone:1-800-888-7828;web site:a %,%-_eurch-institute.orb. U Vt
Strategic Planning
Attachment C
Atascadero Road Program
Action Plan
ISSUE
Asphalt roads require maintenance and repair to provide a smooth and safe driving
surface and to lengthen their useful life. The citizens of Atascadero have rated road
repairs as their number 1 priority.
Currently the City does not have a funded annual pavement management system. Many
of the roads have not been maintained for many years. Storm water flows uncontrolled
across many roads.
OBJECTIVES
Develop the Atascadero Road Program. This will be a multifaceted program attacking the
issue from many directions. The ultimate goal is to have an operating program to
maintain the roads in an organized logical manner within the available funding.
PLAN
Reorganize City street crews
Responsible Person: Steve Kahn
Date: June 2000
Develop an annual street maintenance program that allows the City street crews to be
more involved in direct road maintenance. Reorganize staff to meet this goal. This will
involve work in the following areas: fixing pot holes and base failure, berm placement,
shoulder work, crack sealing, patching and support work for overlays and reconstruction.
Develop Pavement Management System
Responsible Person: Steve Kahn
Date: July 2000
Review the circulation system and the state of repair of the existing road system. Develop
and implement a priority system to repair and rehabilitate the road system based on the
community and Council direction.
Seek additional funding for road maintenance and repair
Responsible Person: Steve Kahn
Date: September 2000
Possible sources for funding are SLOCOG, Caltrans, and federal government, bond
measures and new taxes. Public Works will work very closely with the Council and
community to develop funding.
Help citizens on non City-maintained roads maintain and repair the road
Responsible Person: Steve Kahn
Date: September 2000
There are several options that will be explored. Some possible actions are: provide
assistance in the administration, design and construction of assessment districts, provide
cold mix for pot hole repair and accept certain roads into the City maintained system.
•
�3 �
Youth Center Action Plan
ISSUE
Fund, design and build a Youth/ Community Center.
OBJECTIVES
Provide additional space in the community for youth and community events. Reduce reliance on the
school district for indoor events. Expand youth programs and provide a location for teen services.
PLAN
Location
Responsible Person: Geoff English
Date: May 2000
Determine a suitable site for the Atascadero Youth/Community Center.
Design
Responsible Person: Eric Hagen
Date: May 2000
Create preliminary building plans, site maps and Architectural renderings.
Funding
Responsible Person: Brady Cherry
Date: May 2000
Request State funding from the local legislators for the 2000/2001 State budget. Request funding for
design and construction plans in the City of Atascadero budget for 2000/2001.
Feasibility Study
Responsible Person: Geoff English
Date: July 2000
Create a Financial Feasibility Report and submit to the City Council.
Architecture
Develop a scope of work for an RFP.
Responsible Person: Steve Kahn
Date: September 2000
Distribute RFP
Responsible Person: Geoff English
Date: October 2000
6,40
Select Architect.
Responsible Person: Geoff English
Date: December 2000
Community Workshops regarding the design.
Responsible Person: Geoff English
Date: February 2001
Final approval Architectural Plans and Construction Drawings.
Responsible Person: Steve Kahn
Date: April 2001
Construction
Prepare and distribute Bid Documents for construction.
Responsible Person: Steve Kahn
Date: May 2001
Award Bid for Construction.
Responsible Person: Steve Kahn
Date: July 2001
Develop a"Wish Catalog" of needed equipment and supplies and market.
Responsible Person: Paula Anton
Date: July 2001
Conduct a Groundbreaking Ceremony
Responsible Person: Geoff English
Date: August 2001
Order needed equipment and supplies.
Responsible Person: Paula Anton
Date: September 2001
Plan and Organize the Grand Opening Ceremonies.
Responsible Person: Geoff English
Date: September-December 2001
Conduct Grand Opening Ceremonies. Take possession of the building
Responsible Person: Geoff English
Date: February 2002.
641
Downtown
Action Plan
ISSUE
Complete Downtown revitalization Plan and begin implementation
OBJECTIVES
Complete the downtown revitalization strategy, have it adopted and begin implementation of the
Main Street program
PLAN
Complete Carlton OPA and related projects
Responsible Person: Paul Saldana
Date: May 2000
Complete Draft of Revitalization Plan
Responsible Person: Consultant
Date: June 2000
Conduct hearings and adoption of Plan
Responsible Person: Paul Saldana
Date: July 2000
Main Street Organization
Responsible Person: Community
Date: September 2000
Establish committees and hire a Main Street Coordinator.
042.
Economic Development
Action Plan
ISSUE
Create a prosperous community in which economic development efforts recognize the value of
humane resources and environmental health, and build on resource-efficient design to create a
more self-reliant and sustainable community.
OBJECTIVES
Develop and implement an economic development strategy providing for expansion of the jobs
and tax base of the local community enhancing the economy and quality of life.
PLAN
Participate in Economic Vitality Corporation 5 Year Strategic Plan program
Responsible Person: Paul Saldana
Date: May 2000
The EVC is developing a five-year strategic plan for economic development implementation
countywide. The plan will serve as a useful tool in the development of the City economic
development strategy.
Participate in development of EVC Marketing Plan
Responsible Person: Paul Saldana
Date: May 2000
The EVC is developing a business recruitment marketing plan in conjunction with their 5 year
Strategy. The Marketing plan will incorporate marketing of other collaborative efforts to promote
the Central Coast.
Prepare and adopt Economic Development Strategy
Responsible Person: Paul Saldana
Date: May-June 2000
The Strategy will review a variety of strategic initiatives that will increase the capacity for
business attraction and retention efforts. These initiatives would be outlined in a Strategy that
would focus on building foundations for successful economic development, fostering business
success and lead to creating new opportunities and economic diversification. The Strategy would
likely be refined based on labor market, and other information analysis to determine suitable
target businesses.
Complete Labor Market Survey
Responsible Person: Consultant& Staff
Date: July 2000
The Labor Market Survey will serve as a foundation for targeting industries that could take
advantage of the existing labor force residing in the community.
643
Complete Target Industry Analysis
Responsible Person: Paul Saldana
Date: September 2000
Based on the labor market analysis and the land use analysis conducted as part of the general plan
update, a target industry analysis would be completed that would focus recruitment efforts on
attracting quality jobs to the community.
Complete Inventory and"Packaging"of sites for business expansion and attraction
Responsible,Person: Paul Saldana
Date: December 2000
A summary of available sites would be prepared for dissemination to local businesses for
expansion consideration and for new business attraction. Timing would be based on the
completion of the general plan update and establishment of the downtown revitalization plan,
both of which would identify potential sites.
044
General Plan Update
Action Plan
ISSUE
Complete thy General Plan Update in FY 2000-01
OBJECTIVES
Complete update of general plan by year end 2000.
PLAN
Conduct Community Outreach program
Responsible Person: Community Development Staff
Date: May 2000 (initial outreach), July 2000, September 2000, December 2000
Complete Housing Element Background Report
Responsible Person: Consultant
Date: June 2000
Complete Land Use Diagram update/alternatives
Responsible person: Consultant
Date: June 2000
Complete EIR for Draft General Plan
Responsible Person: Consultant
Date: August 2000
Conduct Hearings on General Plan and EIR
Responsible Person: Staff and Consultant
Date: December 2000
045
Community Involvement
Action Plan
ISSUE
1
Engage the community in governing and provide public information.
OBJECTIVES
Engage the community in decision making and the implementation of community vision.
Provide opportunities to be involved and get information to community members.
PLAN
Work with the media
Responsible Person: All Council and Staff
Date: Ongoing
Provide information and press releases often. Return phone calls and requests as quick as
possible. Always be available.
City Web Site
Responsible Person: Andrew Fruin
Date: October 2000
Complete the departmental pages and general information. Update current topic pages.
Add interactive information. Market the site.
City Newsletter
Responsible Person: Wade McKinney
Date: four times annually
Produce the Atascaderian four times a year including topical and interesting information.
City Manager's Newsletter
Responsible Person: Wade McKinney
Date: Ongoing
Continue to disseminate current information in the newsletter.
Special Reports
Responsible Person: Department Heads
Date: Ongoing
In conjunction with major projects like the General Plan or Redevelopment, use special
newsletters and mailers.
046
Continue to Publish Display ads in the newspaper
Responsible Person: Marcia Torgerson
Date: Ongoing
Continue to write articles for newspapers or newsletters
Responsible Person: Wade McKinney
Date: Ongoing
Continue the article in the Chamber of Commerce newsletter and the local newspapers.
Speak to Community Groups
Responsible Person: Council and Staff
Date: Ongoing
Be available to speak on community issues at community organization meetings.
Neighborhood Preservation is
Action Plan
ISSUE
Establish a proactive neighborhood preservation and enhancement program.
t
OBJECTIVES
Creation of fully functioning and universally understood code enforcement program within the
city that provides a consistent proactive approach to enforcement of city regulations.
PLAN
City Code Enforcement Team (inclusive of all appropriate departments)
Responsible Person: David Matthews
Date: June 2000
Bring participants from all departments together and review Code Enforcement issues and
programs.
City Neighborhood Preservation and Code Enforcement Policy
Responsible Person: Paul Saldana
Date: July 2000
Review and update the current policy.
Citywide training program on code compliance issues and project tracking
Responsible Person: David Matthews
Date: August 2000
Develop a citywide training program so that all employees know the City's policy on code
enforcement, who is responsible, how to report a violation and how to participate in the
monitoring.
Citywide canvass to identify potential violations
Responsible Person: Code Enforcement Team
Date:August-September 2000
Marketing awareness and grace period for citywide compliance
Responsible Person: Code Enforcement Team
Date: September-October 2000
Develop a marketing awareness program to let neighborhoods know of violations. The program
will include a grace period and a cleanup program.
Full Initiation of Proactive Code Enforcement Program
Responsible Person: Code Enforcement Team
Date:November 2000
1048
Funding City Services Action Plan
ISSUE
The City mlust have financial resources to fund municipal services, infrastructure and
reserves necessary to support a quality community. The State has significant control over
the City's finances and there are few local financial stratgegies. The City seeks to expand
its revenue base and focus expenditures so that the result is a balanced financial strategy
where the community lives within its means.
OBJECTIVES
Develop a variety of strategies to expand City revenues. Further a conservative
expenditure plan focusing resources on the City's core mission. Provide for long term
financial stability.
PLAN
Update Comprehensive Financial Strategy
Responsible Person: Wade McKinney
Date: July 2000
Update the current strategy to current year dollars and improve the supporting
information relying as much as possible on actual numbers as opposed to assumptions.
Investigate the use of multi year budget
Responsible Person: Rachelle Rickard
Date: October 2000
Consider the use of a two-year budget cycle. Review the experience of other agencies
and make a determination if mid budget modifications would out weigh the benefits of a
longer-term plan.
Develop benchmarks to measure services and expenditures
Responsible Person: Coordinator Wade McKinney, Department Heads responsible for
individual departments
Date: December 2000
Create useful performance indicators that would allow the community to see what
services they are receiving and track the progress/value.
Seek employee input for cost-savingideas
deas
Responsible Person: Wade McKinney
Date: June 2000
Include all employees in the budget process to insure that the City implements the most
efficient systems and asks difficult questions of the status quo.
Review coordination opportunities between departments
Responsible Person: Wade McKinney
Date: November 2000
Analyze opportunities for cooperation or support of specific services between
departments. Identify if there are efficiencies between departments or more efficient
service delivery systems already in place.
Update legislative program
Responsible Person: Wade McKinney
Date: January 2001
Annually update the City's legislative priorities.
Update Development Impact Fees
Responsible Person: Steve Kahn
Date: July 2000
See Action Plan for Growth Mitigation Program
Update Fees for Service
Responsible Person: Rachelle Rickard, Department Heads responsible for indivdual
departments. .
Date: December 2000
Departments will review fees for service and obtain comparable information from other
agencies. A plan to update fees for service will be presented to Council.
Create a Cost Study for City Services
Responsible Person: Rachelle Rickard
Date: November 2000
A plan will be developed that monitors costs for all City services. The plan will include
costs of personnel and all support (including computers, desks, vehicles, etc.). Each
service will be reviewed to determine the necessary time and support commitment
required. This information will be used to develop actual costs of doing business.
Economic Development
Responsible Person: Paul Saldana
Date: June
See the Economic Development Action Plan
Expand the use of grant funds and investigate employing a full time grant writing
professional.
Responsible Person: Wade McKinney
Date: June
Evaluate the potential of a full time grant writer or contract to expand the use of grants.
Insure that each department is pursuing an effective grant program.
Uro
Growth Mitigation Program Update
Action Plan
ISSUE
The Growth Mitigation Program is used to construct new capital improvements to
mitigate the effects of new development on the City. The Growth Mitigation Program
has not been updated for many years and is in need of updating. The fees the City collects
do not provide sufficient funding to construct the portion of the Atascadero's Capital
Improvement Program for which new development is responsible.
The City has begun the updating its General Plan, the blueprint for the future. The Plan
will depict growth over the next 20 years. The City, within the context of the General
Plan Update will look at what infrastructure is needed to support any new growth. The
General Plan Update is scheduled to be completed early next year. This information can
be used to update the Growth Mitigation Program.
OBJECTIVES
Update the Growth Mitigation Program for the City of Atascadero.
PLAN
Prepare for annual update
Responsible Person: Steve Kahn
Date: May-June 2000
Review the existing program. Obtain inflation information and information from other
jurisdictions. Prepare the annual update.
Update Capital Improvement Program
Responsible Person: Steve Kahn
Date: May 16, 2000
Present the Capital Improvement Program to the Planning Commission to make
consistency finding with the General Plan.
Update Growth Mitigation Program
Responsible Person: Steve Kahn
Date: July 25, 2000
Public Hearing on Growth Mitigation Program Report and inflation update.
Ll 51
General Plan Process
Responsible Person: Steve Kahn
Date: August 2000 until General Plan Update complete
Work with Community Development Department, the community and the City Council
on identifying the infrastructure required for different General plan scenarios.
Revise Growth Mitigation Pro ram
Responsible Person: Steve Kahn
Date: After General Plan is updated
Based on the updated General Plan the Council will consider revising the Growth
Mitigation Program.
Ci52
ITEM NUMBER: C-2
DATE: 05/09/2000
MINK ! ■
M w
191$ 9 1 8
Atascadero City Council
Staff Report - City Manager's Office
Proposed 805 Area Code Split or Overlay
RECOMMENDATION:
Council authorize Mayor to send letter to the California Public Utilities Commission supporting
Alternative #1A which would retain the 805 area code in Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo
counties.
DISCUSSION:
The 805 area code currently services Ventura, Santa Barbara, and San Luis Obispo Counties.
The telecommunications industry is projected to exhaust the 805 Area Code during the third
quarter of 2004. The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), in an effort to meet the
rising demand for cell phones, fax machines, models and pagers, is proposing two alternatives to
split the current area code, and a third alternative to apply an overlay.
The area code planning process begins with the North American Numbering Plan Administrator
(NANPA) and the telecommunications industry group comprised of more than thirty companies,
meeting to identify viable solutions. After feasible alternatives are developed, meetings are held
with government representatives and the public to gain the benefit from their experience and
knowledge. Local jurisdictions were invited to Santa Barbara on February 2, 2000 to review and
comment on potential relief alternatives for the 805 Area Code transition plan. Staff attended
this meeting.
The telecommunications industry will ultimately reach a consensus on the best plan for the area
as a whole. The plan, with the industry's recommendation, is then submitted to the CPUC. The
final decision will be made sixteen to eighteen months.
Analysis: The CPUC is offering three alternatives as possible solutions:
Alternative #lA— Ventura County receive a new area code, Santa Barbara and San
Luis Obispo Counties maintain the 805 area code.
Alternative #1B - Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo Counties receive new area
code, Ventura County maintain the 805 area code.
053
ITEM NUMBER: C-2
DATE: 05/09/2000
Alternative#2 - All counties keep the 805 area code for existing telephone i
numbers. All new telephone numbers would receive a new area
code. This would require the dialing of 1+10 digits with every call
you made to anyone who received their telephone number after a
specific date.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Negative. A new area code would have a negative impact on our community. The need to notify
friends and family of new telephone numbers will be time consuming. Also, a new area code
would financially impact local businesses, including the City, as a result of the need for new
business cards, stationary and advertising.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Council could choose to support Alternative #1 B which would bring a new area code to
Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo counties.
2. Council could choose to support Alternative #2 which would create an overlay of a new
area code over the existing 805 area code in Ventura, Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo
counties.
ATTACHMENTS:
A—Alternative#1 A
B—Alternative #I B
C—Alternative 2
D—Draft Resolution
•
05)4
805 Area Code
Attachment A
id yam„ i
1S �
� d
R CL
_ +�
m o
LU
v OG
c m rO S CL 3
�v O.
e Lo
rt 4k gr Z Q Q
In
CD
to Co +� d °' z a 1
CL 00 Q •, a
z a s 3
O i Z U)
U-)
0
$ 0
A
uA
L
3 g a
V W <
t
V
� s
g {
i
IL
6 p
w Ln
3 C>
Coa
Co J
q �
CL
L
`u < u i
W V
055
805 Area Code
Attachment B
.iJ N
0. N > N c 11
it
g m I=
°= CS
i V RS W 0 Lnuj
'< o
Q Q U Co
a.
CL 0
` i N
. ,L M
v
a
aW
1 z
u tl
� r u
s �
a �
u
W a
z
.G a
u
CL
< Y a
a
m
N
x � u
P
CL
16 A
i
805 Area Code
Attachment C
c
~meg
Zd 4) o 0 � �
x G +ccLn _
m �, S
14v G m- > W a
ate. 0 V -W
a � J O d Z !
V
Z •4+ 0 ` b
.. nn _
19 CL L1 U Q a m
4 z
� u
V gL
8 � h
1 tl
V
�3 ti
6
g
z
8
Y Y
m
� � o
W u
u
s
057
805 Area Code
DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. Attachment D
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO, SUPPORTING THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES
COMMISSION ALTERNATIVE #1A WHICH WOULD RETAIN THE 805
AREA CODE FOR SANTA BARBARA AND SAN LUIS OBISPO
COUNTIES
WHEREAS, the telecommunications industry is projected to exhaust the existing
805 Area Code during the third quarter of 2004; and
WHEREAS, in order to meet these demands for service, the California Public
Utilities Commission is proposing two alternatives to split the current area code or, as a third
alternative, to apply an overlay to the entire existing area code; and
WHEREAS, the impacts on the citizens of Atascadero would be significant if
there were a required change of the 805 Area Code as well as a negative financial impact on
local businesses, including the City; and
WHEREAS, Alternative #lA would divide the existing area code but retain the
805 Area Code for Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo Counties with Ventura County to receive
a new area code; and
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Atascadero, California, that a Resolution be issued supporting Alternative #lA of the
California Public Utilities Commission proposal for the split of the existing 805 Area Code.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Atascadero held on May 9, 2000.
CITY OF ATASCADERO
Ray Johnson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
0�8
ITEM NUMBER: C-3
_ DATE: 05/09/2000
Isis ® 1079
Atascadero City Council
City Manager's Office
Information Bulletin
A. General Plan Update
The Community Newsletter was mailed to residents on April 29. A copy of the newsletter is
attached. Eight (8) neighborhood areas have been identified for the first series of community
meetings. The meetings will be facilitated by the Community Development Department and
City employees who recently completed the Atascadero Leadership Academy. Each area was
mailed an invitation to attend their neighborhood meeting. The meetings will begin at 7:00 p.m.
and are planned for 90 minutes. They will be held as follows.
May 15 —Monterey Road School and Atascadero Library
May 16—Junior High and Lake Pavilion
May 17—Lake Pavilion and Junior High
May 18 - Santa Rosa School and Nazarene Church
Following completion of the first series of meetings, additional meetings will be added to ensure
the broadest involvement of the community.
In addition to the community meetings, the Atascadero High School Leadership Class is
canvassing the community with cameras taking pictures of what they like and don't like about
Atascadero. This is a similar exercise the community is being asked to participate in. The
results of the high school students' pictures will be on display at the community meetings.
A web site is being currently being developed and a special e-mail address has been established
for inquiries about the general plan update process. The e-mail address is
eneralplangatacscadero.org
059
ITEM NUMBER: C-3
DATE: 05/09/2000
B. Joint City Council's Meeting t
The City of San Luis Obispo will be hosting a Joint City Council's meeting on Thursday, June
15, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Embassy Suites in San Luis Obispo. A
tentative agenda is as follows:
1. Prospects and consequences of passage of SB 402- Binding Arbitration
2. aDecision in the case which held that ERAF was a State mandated program and
required that State take-aways must be returned to local government.
3. Reconsidering State property tax take-aways of the early 90's: Exploring
Alternative Ways to Allocate Property Taxes. SB 1982 (Alpert)tax reallocation
4. AB 2838 (Hertzberg)—Requires cities to share costs of LAFCo.
5. Proposition 218 —City revenues in the future.
6. E-commerce and the local sales tax.
C. Employee Update
Jeffrey Miller Pavilion Service Worker Hired 4/3/2000
Ron Moret Building Inspector II Hired 5/1/2000
•
060
a"o scajero
P(ann�n Our Future
Kill9
- -
ATAsCADERO . . . why it's Time for a
A SPECIAL PLACE General Plan Update
Neighborhoods in Atascadero share
many traits of the people who live in
.them. Diverse, with unique
i characteristics that shape their identities,
the neighborhoods are dynamic and
" r evolving, just as families grow,
individuals change and people move.
IN
Ideally, that evolution is guided
by a plan that details a city's vision for
�_-----� ---' ; fc its future development, from the
downtown core to outlying
residential areas.
Atascadero is set to embark on an
*R update of that document—called the
` AM � r General Plan -and is encouraging
fttresidents to participate in a number of
ways. Updating the General Plan
-- provides Atascadero residents with,a
unique opportunity to collaborate in an
effort to enhance and protect our city's
Framed on the east by the banks of the Salinas River, beautiful environment while ensuring it
to the %vest by the steep ravines and shade oaks of the Santa Lucia retains a vital economy.
Mountains,Atascadero's rural landscape surrounds a central A series of neighborhood workshops
do%%,nto\cn. For our residents, the city offers a small-torn lifestyle are planned to foster a cooperative
combined \r,ith modern amenities. environment in which common goals
Protecting our city's special character is the aim of updating will emerge. The success of those
Atascadero's General Plan. workshops depends on your
That process relies on your involvement. During the %reeks participation.
ahead, a series of neighborhood meetings and other public Please join us as we enhance our P.U
Nvorkshops are scheduled to encourage }-our input vision of Atascadero's future.
A T A S C A D E R O - P L A N N I N G O U R F U T U R E
KEY TERMS HOW ATASCADERO'S
GENERAL PLAN
General Plan
A document with written text,goals,policies and AFFECTS YOU!
maps that provides a 20 year vision to guide State law requires all cities to have an updated General
develepment,identify public facilities,and protect Plan that serves as a"blueprint" for future development in
sensitive areas. those communities.A simple example of how a General
Plan works is ensuring that residential neighborhoods
Land Use Jk
maintain integrit} by
A terns that describes different types of activities � �° � '•$e preventing incompatible
r
that are permitted to occur on a parcel ofland.
y" uses — such as a noise
Single family residential,commercial,parks,and
business — from
open space are examples of common land use r �� y •
locating nearb}.
designations.
Obviously, with limited
Elements land and the need to balance what at times are conflicting
VII State of California requires General Plans to Visions, updating a General Plan can be far more
have seven separate elements (or sections) that complicated.The location of shopping,parks, homes, and
address Lind Use,Circulation,Housing, Open open spaces are some of the pieces of the puzzle.
Space, Conservation,Noise and Safety. For a General Plan to work effectively, it should be the
Consolidated elenhents are permitted to address result of consensus in the community.With your
several issues in a single section. participation, that goal can be achieved.
Goals
A statement of desired direction or outcome. A LITTLE HISTORY
Each element of the General Plan will incorporate The community of Atascadero was originally founded
one or more goal statements on which policies, in 1913 by Edward Gardner Lewis, a successful magazine
programs and reaps will be based. publisher from the East. It was Lewis' vision to create a
model community that would provide its residents with the
Planning Commission most favorable aspects of }
All appointed advisory body that makes both social, environmental and ►
A
decisions and recommendations to the Cit\ economic needs of the
Council on laud use issues within the cotuuunit\. community. Incorporated in
1979,Atascadero's
Smart Growth Principles population is currently
Planning principles adopted by the City that more than 23,000 residents,
pravide guidelines to encourage pedestrian making it the second largest
friendly and environmentally responsible
city in San Luis Obispo
development. County.
SIGNIFICANT DATES FOIR
14
E.G.Lewis acquires Atascadero Colony State General Plan County adopts first State General Plan t
and forms "subdivision" laws adopted General Plan for laws changed to pt
Atascadero Colony created and recorded Atascadero area require General Plan updat,
to"guide" Plan
development
2 r,6;.
A T A S C A D E R O — P L A N N I N G O U R F U T U R E
BUILDING ON THE PRESENT
The General Pian defines the location, type and character of residential,
commercial and public areas that are permitted within the community.
The Plan consists of goals and policies and a land use map that shows where
things go.The Council determined that the updated General Plan would build on
the goals of the existing General Plan, last updated in 1992.The following goals
were reaffirmed to serve as the basis for the General Plan update.
Existing General Plan Land Use Element Goals
• Protect and preserve the rural atmosphere of the community by assuring "elbow room" for residents by
means of maintenance of large lot sizes, which increase in proportion to distance beyond the urban core.
• Provide for a sound economic base to sustain the city's unique character.
• Preserve residential neighborhoods & respect the winding tree-lined nature of the
street and road system.
• Preserve the contours of the hills. Buildings built on hillsides shall conform to the topography using the
slope of the land as the basis for the design of the structure.
• Preserve natural flora and fauna.
• Designate areas where livestock can be owned and maintained.
• Provide for a comprehensive system of routes-to schools and parks, which may
include creekside trails.
• Provide for walkways, horse trails, and bikeways without curbs and sidewalks in .. -
some rural areas. i a°
• Provide for a strong and distinctive downtown area. �*
• Transform the existing EI Camino Real "strip" into distinctive, attractive and -
Q, f
efficient commercial, office and industrial park areas, which can provide for the
long-term economic viability of the community.
• Provide for adequate public services.
_ANNING IN ATASCADERO
1979 1980 9, 8.9 1991-95
Atascadero becomes Cite approves Cin- initiates update City completes and City initiates
incorporated City update.of 1978 Plan of General Plan approves various consolidation and
cera (City's first General updates to General update of General
Plan) Plan Plan elements
G,G3 3
tascadero Presorted Standard
Planning Our Future US Postale
PAID
p pp D a 130 Permit 163 AMS
yr1+ Paso Robles,CA
6500 Palma Avenue
Atascadero, CA 93422
Change Service Requested
How CAN
I RECEIVE
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION?
Community and Economic
Development Department
805 /461-5035
e-mail: generalplanCaatascadero.org
visit our website: www.atascadero.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WHO AND WHEN SAY IT IN PICTURES
There will be a variety of opportunities for the public Sometimes words aren't enough.
to provide input and raise issues.The goal is to create a A photo of a
strong awareness and understanding of our City's pumpkin patch filled '' ~
General Plan. In the process to openly discuss with you with plump orange 4.
topics that are important to you, the City Council has gourds and golden +i
determined that the community's involvement in the straw on a late fall r
, r
update process is a top priority.The update process is afternoon makes
expected to take place over the next nine months and its own eloquent
will provide numerous opportunities for community statement for
involvement. open space. So,too, "
does a photo of an empty downtown
sidewalk taken on a Saturday afternoon.
With the city updating its General Plan, we want
d residents to start taking pictures. Pictures of what
makes Atascadero appealing, as well as pictures that
� .. show how the city can improve.
Bring those photos to neighborhood workshops,
where plans for the city's future development will be
discussed.Your photos are a unique tool with which the
., .----� city's positive and negative attributes can be illustrated.
ITEM NUMBER: E—3a
DATE: 05/09/2000
Eats' a
R
1919 1 79
Atascadero City Council
City Clerk Report
Appointment of Ex-Officio Youth Representative on the
Parks and Recreation Commission
RECOMMENDATION:
Council select a subcommittee of the Council to review the youth application, interview the
applicant if the subcommittee deems it necessary and submit their recommendation to the
Council.
DISCUSSION:
In 1990, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 109-90 creating ex-officio youth members on
certain City commissions and committees. This Resolution states that a subcommittee of the City
Council will review the applications and interview applicants if the subcommittee deems it
necessary.
The Parks and Recreation Commission has had several youth representatives sporadically over the
last ten years. The Youth Representative position for the Parks and Recreation Commission has
been vacant since Brian Potter resigned in February 2000.
Applicants must be 16-18 years of age and a resident of the City of Atascadero. The term for this
position is one year. The City Clerk has solicited applications for this position with ads in the
Atascadero News and notices at Atascadero High School. One completed application was received
from Michell Kim. The Parks and Recreation Commission has reviewed Michell's application on
March 16, 2000 and unanimously supports her appointment by the Council.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Council request City Clerk to schedule a formal interview of the Applicant.
2. Council review application and appoint the Applicant to the Youth Representative
position.
ATTACHMENTS: A. Resolution No. 109-90
B. Michell Kim's application
G 6 5
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF THE CITY OF
ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA, CREATING EX-OFFICIO
YOUTH MEMBERS ON CERTAIN CITY COMMISSIONS AND
COMMITTEES
The City Council. of the City of Atascadero, California,
resolves as follows:
1. There shall be ex-officio youth members of the following:
0
a. Parks, Recreation and Zoo Commission ,
b. Traffic Committee
c. Recycling Committee
2. These youth members shall have the following
qualifications:
a. Be between the ages of 16 and 18 years
b. Be a resident of the City of Atascadero
3. The terms of office of these ex-officio youth members
shall be one year. Members may be reappointed if they still meet
the qualifications set forth in No. 2 above.
4. Vacant positions will be advertised by the City Clerk .
Applications must be submitted by interested youth. A
subcommittee of the City Council will review the applications and
interview applicants if the subcommittee deems it necessary.
Three finalists shall be submitted to the City Council for
selection.
5. The appointments must be made by a majority of the City
Council. The appointees serve at the pleasure of the City
Council and serve until replaced or removed. Appointees may be
removed with or without cause by a majority of the City Council.
On motion by Councilmember Dexter , and seconded
by Councilmember __ 1J11Py , the foregoing resolution
is adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers Shiers, Borgeson, Nimmo Dexter and
Mayor Lilley
Noes: None
Absent: None
Date Adopted: August 28, 1990
GGA
RESOLUTION NO. 109-90
Page 2
By
0 ERT LI LEY, Mayo
City of Atascader California
ATTEST-
LE bAYKA, City Cqerk
Approved as to form:
ARTH R R. RONTAON,—tlty--Atorney
ARM: fr
RES: 007
L'
elm ! O 5
Ir-9-118 _ e
Please return to:
CITY CLERK
f`tii>tffefiss` sz;'>> > '•>»zzi« `=:'E>
6500 Palma Avenue :::�:.,:::::::::::::.•::.:�:.�::::::::::::::.
Room207 ...................::::: .>•::•::;;:.:�•;•;;;.�:::::.�.;.;;:::.;::::::.
Atascadero, CA 93422
CITY OF ATASCADERO
BOARD, COMMITTEE & COMMISSION APPLICATION
Please Note: You must meet the minimum qualifications of being a registered voter and resident of the City (exception. teen
representatives need not be registered voters). Please fill out and attach the Supplemental Questionnaire for the advisory body
you are applying,fora r/
NAME: {�( �( � 1�� Home Phone: LF
ADDRESS: 50-Zo PGtllru Ave Work Phone:
Are you a resident of the City of Atascadero? E5• How Long? AILS.
EMPLOYMENT:
Present or last employer (or school, if applicable)
Afascad-ero a h 5 hod --
EDUCATION:
cI !
hl i , I
RELEVANT TRAINING, EXPERIENCE, CERTIFICATES OF TRAINING, LICENSES OR PROFESSIONAL
REGISTRATION:
INVOLVEMENT IN COMMUNITY, VOLUNTEER, PROFESSIONAL AND/OR ACADEMIC
ORGANIZATIONS:
p 1 4uluMet
at ctmva Lescaii A me, cuill Tasks rorCe- Cy iK rep•), 1-e d-er5hC3 yr5.)
OTHER CITY COMMISSIONS,COMMI EES OR BOARDS PREVIOUSLY OR CURRENTLY SERVING ON:
fomm(cis.oer- C5UCol b6ard�— Gtl�-e� flcc-�
How did you learn about this vacancy? Newspaper Ad Community Group
Word of Mouth Library City Hall Place of Employment
Other (specify): P[i!dh11�h '51boI
This application and supplement are"public documents" and are available for review upon request. Applicants are advised they
may be requested to file a Statement of Economic Interest,pursuant to the Fair Political Practices regulations. Information will
be provided by the City Clerk.
� v
CITY OF ATASCADERO
SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE
PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION -YOUTH REPRESENTATIVE
1. Please explain why you would like to serve on the Parks & Recreation Commission.
2. What is it about the Parks & Recreation Commission that interests you? What qualities,
experience and expertise would you bring to the Commission?
L fa a-
ilC' cc cf c,0,U
3. What role does parks and recreation play in maintaining a healthy city?
ah
LC
,
C�- c>"i i�lC h��cl c�, ��<.r ctcc.��M.1 ?.c�1C�. Lrl.ctLc-1
A a+ j a c-C
i
4's' AlIt taI ti 7
069
Supplemental Questionnaire
Parks & Recreation Commission - Youth Representative
Page 2
4. How would you see your role as a member of the Commission?
" t
I+
I ALU) ; M LA �I 1 C.rL<L G J4,i` 0— 111.L�'n
t
(((,k- '�. ,� �, _ 1 r�r h—(L
5. In your opinion, what are Atascadero's greatest public recreation needs?
f
da CL ("t1-1 L-h, l ,� -Ll l�
6. What methods should be used to fund Atascadero's public recreation programs and
facilities?
1
-r 14(� (L k 1,41 CIC I fl,
1
I I 'r ,, —I)s OhJ 0-cl (LI t—tJ (I'LLc
2: ) ,( c , ,t.c hn _ 1
70
Supplemental Application
Parks & Recreation Commission - Youth Representative
Page 3
7. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Commission achieve?
+
-h l 0.�Yr1't+vtj E'itip hi . 1 --h uti t',k _7M Ct`t u a cI /Ac c t&&
Ct'aJ, act
a
jt-'w4l) aLac- ALIt, c/aL atA cL*J
8. If there is additional information you would like to share about yourself, please use the
following space provided (optional).
l A �t�ei-a- b elt rteh a&
,nL IL1'Z' 4L-L ({ 1.41 b(,t:'I iU'l l.f--C: - f L t'i1 &( o Li I t"0") fl
I
I hereby certify that the foregoing information is true and correct.
Signature. Date:
'l �.