Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 04/25/2000 * ry -)END i .+=y!✓#�WdR' COUNCIL1 1 4 e 1 A }' s t f 4 of' g� AldSCad@i'U nye, ' Floor ;s �H�774}4,ivF$ iiOliQ `3 + ; 44 .s rS, '4i! xp.tdf d •: � 3'ii ✓ • Vtl'-i �y ft k9 d fk s Y l iilR ^.LVgV Fi,Sgi Rgdovit lynx Agee yy';♦ feting,) ). §54956M y of Artaseadra Atasr et `Tined School Inti Gon£eMuM w th labor ru ,g6tiator(Govt:'." oole x, +NgOtlator: 1 Maner. a, y organizat ons , r'tment heads,11 idrtl g�n#/l ole oval xr , Confidential�A-ta ea&io Fire"(1 tt ins,.t isCl er61` f lterS '41al iCE' 4 ;.LQ l 620, Atascadero,POi�e`f39sCT�,. ? i 7. irk°. '� Al�CE>> unil Member Scalise ayor *,On .mVie;++"An 'm ayor Pro . flay yK. g 'YL k y� pygt 14, q T� �yjo e r;b 'fir k Pr" n�~ .$ xM { py id � 111Ambor.16Iuna^ ��k... `...rat �.� _. s _ .,.. .__ .. < _a r. ..,c 1•.. a, d,y n$.rt a aa' N, 4 f'' �s t L rued far Arsons' * to , ., ` cz, r i zr v v�hac z t e of icaletas.,jurisdigf pea e d o e stwig, r a tt .: + bQerrkz t aC �r ,J za & sYrt �n £ i ggnk a J, r .J4iE+c.+l#7R' tiJi k j a �� 4 r "`' `;✓ •;G( J, f}.#t. i tr , C rich 1 �e ,Juke cr r tirl'ef_7"77 + at, a-br f # att tesara1>�idebrs °° tiskesti� �` irtzakr rer� acti #*ta have �" lg♦ac ', ' c kf r.: r � s po a fuhire'Me`a l`�.� a�n�al mcg, to .lfl°0 b�L`GZ+RdJ�r t�s'M'*,f$+ •; ''�`':.+'�t '. t A n {'N bint� ndca .:cc rzsacl ec La be rvutz e rZd hon,, arz r ve w� rAP , VVW,and " e aPo � Y ani matin mf� aiidru1ie y i � u�llesitnrtae�tt ar uerts ' f comas ; czr dsm= Rs1r , "arryc+ „,the 4 h ggeiaved fro tle casr�t : xlear � e` asirs in the fasted ruenc With rzs `�merxtr i ` dczlc'P ar ,ungtJe: Y Mg z 01000 takseain zl �. 6 1 1,1 inrarei�zdrzttnn.."c"O a zl � ►'o t�f City+Goam1,mirr rte f p'iz''1l , 2 die oii/ C�iY 1 1 ccs k4 Y t, .,i VatA Jl J. `4✓ `' VV �llg r4yl.fbc YNM$ SFW Q, �4 � �'�GvM+Y�4S { A a s isal"impret Mme ; cOstavoved in ad ringltZzsrr , ram ark �d the 100 o inistrcatrv�r e� w r�r eridtin:r Cru 1 ado to ra, a d ResQl�ctian decl- g vegetatovef Wr'tWtlE andl0r>' ' pubc'nizncexomieirzg pPeednS for t2+ ' tbaterrsent sY k refs ii i' 'es aid placing rll abet zrzent ee c t o ear ^t is k or s�yew 2 Tak 11 r 'ieJ yy Fu : �}. " 54b .�1ria+ Aven4' " # lr 3 1. 5 3 `✓t t • hit iy Inw" 090. 'n S#�,f reGs, 'oimci°: , t + k 4 v,r "S7, parcel, ,map # BdQ .mad Ak�, 4iAcept axltrikt,l?`blt t�lzt .aao 7rbuilt prtzon ° parcel zzsitcanarrizcertYOk, Ci y.4co€acil, Xt Clerk;Cir � C # rAb ak " t Fiscal impact: &1GZ,14 <. � �" ;', rt ! k l�}1lYlt3E6' t e; t921YIG t" w �I W cof r7iftur@�r#�1?� I SC(� Zit q ; 4 }` the� n f$i2, µ ity 11�it a8 ,� ✓ r A" A " � , - a • w ' + �diir tTt.PT - ';:vena —Zone Change 99f� 7f.Master Plan of i a r$ np e t(C� 2);'Tentative Parcel Map 9.9�1Q (N.V�.C. �o�rles avenue�4c 5, Sc�mlrilla,Aue`/Shores) _ R " Fiscallhp t" �Vegligibik o,m-n C6m rsata�a reco# nendation: Council. n dt� fr.Re otuti�n, Certifying the pr oposec IYegatfve:De�laMtion• an4: Jhiioiluce/4 e�� } 4rdinahce`for first reahg dry title oni, , t� approve` 2,one hal 'Resolution, apprravitg the Master PlCah o Deveme�ret b(CUP" x � 2) sub e-t to Cbnd ;ons gf Approviit, c a; Draft,Resolut'fgn,� c pproving Tentative Parcel 9d1 fI sub}er t to E � �' fi,��G�ttditt; ,r c�f•�lppr,�vrra� ' F �J111»` ��:ri N'I`" PART ^ { ;O mmetce for City to partici.pati iri the installatioa�of brackets ,' its a prt�Qai � �Real '` ' staffxecan a tarn{ °.Council authorize the contribution gl�uprto$1000,for the . c at h of r ckets and the purchase of 3 ba anersi an a portion r� 'El C inla3o ` se ices] � 77 " ` tot. ladr Pa g Te Rul s andPubl Use P© cie xt lr et::: ��. lzvstswoul Dave to be.covered by the or. cana�ations that Se; 1 ar , ,'t r) to tztaon: Cor neil adept draft R sal ttaon approv#1 `the prOVOsed Aort-Tet° Pl rk Rules,and Public ase Policies originally a,opted , jG'pmmunity `eaces" y' . . e' Stat dos Co d Le s'n Prp —fpr the potential, [ bT 4 #�5{ r� yj'�tr •'YJ11+`11LE7Kf �e+31�/` . r. lr as al Impact wt ne at this time. ' . k tartttriesa'utztr : Cvunil athcrize the N1rrr tea seed corr. pondence to lh ' aspital farmal7 re e ing f tta , gu st' consider tion_o a'lease agreement o rt% riiat six Acres �t to ra er or use.as a u lic ark. Cc�rka»ta as t a P. P. �f P b P �? Awl ( e .,V444UJ Ts4tepprt {. r 4 'C, , ployeep . a�. CA Tv O x s ng r went standin committees. Infot�mative s�atixs reports will be given, ate$ wee r ,r x ak 3 of�6_Ove�ents/S. ,.U. Re ion l Transit Ruth ►�tity �s .... y}Fy.■ �3 3 .,... _....T..y . L5 x ,CSI �: " 'f , a A a: ?+ ' 4 ' ,'� Y� IIJ g `-P - Y q .� x 'ni 1. ^ .,�# -rteo 2 4 '.� t 1 3^P s a b 1*6 x i6 g 71 iK 5X Y �' y+Fr a +i,c r ' �� '�, r s 4_ R t Ai r Water C,G — _e. 1.� . _,' R. ;ztt a. 1k- {{[�t;;7 Coa�j� µd Catrol ca�+ orselsric �at11 r110 �' � tfl. h. b. 1CiII1 n ? a1.e .Pt eyarsr bon## i�ec}uai� Adv��arjr�O1T1111fttP,e , W,11' ��, .a i F ,Yl 2 4 F 4 k Y s i i'x>. 1 L..M +F+F' .5^ ll t K1x Ls Ri kA. i- t »� - ,;F, I 03rd yy77 (p , .{""I y, �I � „' 'f ,� � 9z k „ , �i'F ,406€; 4 �4ut� V+ tp tiF�k7.� t r a `x N¢ I f �'$ �" #f• 7�}'�{. tr«.p. bra{ eR�+�}�ry/1 G C YF' : p Yt g S f : �' l5!'g bY11L� -ir47 T ,. a Y" .i fi 4i` � ,fit 1-� 1 6 ;11 k }11- ( �A� t L y i7 'ip„:VQ 1. i la ,t � �i "�,''C ,9 S f t 1'4 `( l Iii, T, I 11 r.i , ,, "!, ', , �+...�✓ +� 47,1.7 �"'J �J y,..[1'1 CL\r`. ,.,h �j�.i , fi" Yt f', y �. Fav}'- T Y`'— ` } o Eec t1MC £1rtC l Q11ti?15Si " x a $4 : I E z ? j w a V '' f'', 1. ' {a " �, 1-1 g � t,- - r 2 t s- y ;, e e ,. . xw' a.� g y e 3. }x ��' z ijV b I ' 'E AT ��I ACTION.: .Y ,, � .. w - , - 4 S�� 5 k - Mx x� Ff,, s :� �y. ' Al x.° r'� �' S T s4 f t `Ya .' x I *� .fir 3i< . le.", gyp �' d 's t'' .,. w x e a .t , s l € 1-�. +" x ,t;� r', �S :, a t ; " w,iiCITY� �IIJ-+�IILA It , , � I� -' = i 1y,,. N Y T t s a r w s,�Y'7} +s 4 a T ,`y -" s % 1 t A �fi E s i g ay. 1. � �. i rr111V � ' y } t'4 .''",S� of Y 4 ', a t ;� t a E'�' 111 Ir `" x }.�. p .t x` C � s: E �. `� 'r I 11 H� r Y;"* t k k! 3 S�s , kic e a w1 I �i" "' rt. A. e f7$ Y 17 , z T >fi Q °ts f Y S„, i �'4 i F a 8 3 , ° 1 4 ; t": ,�„' a va x ., � 6$ Y r w k h{v _4 9. 'rt r , 11 I 11 d zY 3 k " b r l a "�a r� �y h' j. r x � Y a. ,.� , - x `k '� x d`i`e �, ,r s` a 'r:@ �� Qi,-- , r 1. ' �: iouldt'� rte title ge;: ', r r Y�ire �p er � t l steel.. t ' '0-1' 11 l � y ��&`T rte that p sort Imi�°ed:oa r1.t sm* t�� cac�dre sed at the p 4a ' �� �� 1f hese d r:"tktrs rt�t�ee,Yran-m-'"inre €rrten� a*ere .t tt `ctj`r r . �t� uc $' " s r , % v- 4,. ,1, ,, rF y� :»1.` %-2 x ,�, a k' yrs! S, 3 } ..rx t Y A �y � r +# # ,. 1 t , .; Ufa e " � { 4 4Ch oto lELCOME 1f)THEATAS dTY C6iI1 'hi mEi i s'lNiJLlALW Oi11'11Ri T t y C b K `�C� tr atie�i �re` r session: the second and.fourthf each=month'at x.00 p,m ,, " ,Y h t a AF`Chaitxnber f Cath Half, Maters at a considered by'the Coundl in the Q ,of the printed � Y 4Co of# s x a d�z d entati6n'rctaati g to each item n¢business referred.#o ort'tl ,h , en& *e � caf the City terk Rt t i f18),and in the t�fOTTation Oftrbe( ooni-10�),' _'`�°atbl Sic irtspectirrrt du�r� iyitjy Half brusiness`hours Aaa agenda packet is a�ao, ,ailable fob. A h rt 'Ascs'Library, b8St3 Morro Road:,. *_ r �c#rnpfro �4jneriatnstabtlities Act, ik you flee,specrdt assfS�Ge --Z A , W > `"� setces afleis.City„fale `cottct i lTt�er.s 'ti fir the V, '+t~14 Ol iu ; 8t )4i 1 i ot'rli i kat IeAt4 hours prior't0 the me at ,41 't�trTte ` crx'tices are r< ededrwill hsiist the city`Aa,ff asirir "that reas ►rrabde arrangements' p k< ,< R S * ` , i tvid a }b�t+,ta'the,rrieetig vt service. c s AL, S103�W ON'A+G1tJA IT � WL th ' ce ak oh'an ittwm on the a dada. The May0w. rdent' thea eel8 � y y y b. 1 � f ` aeix�€ , � ut e l= v,ll stIons of st f The ay or will arra nce when a t sEilt _ .#per�tid_is open ai d.wr`ll a west anyone interested ct' ,dress tl e'+ zauneil+regarding r • tt ot�sid cl to step up to the p6diurn. if you.wish t :speak lor,.&g t'c r c went an ; k 4 any w.y • =4{ o ap rc h l~he�podium and be recoitw4ed by the.Nagar 'Al a�SV ; t ss(not'recluired) { _ k • lIale your Stgoo tent , p 4 � A' <ca an Ats'gMu d be made,to the Mayor and Council A4 Iimtt+ d myrtute (in es chaf ed by tb ounc�l)' r s r �xorfe� .speak for a secondi1ne until euryeine wing to speak has had an:apportun�ty �,. . a m y 4� w g ?dry' , b#arF�' $ 4r(�th#gAwice oit"v :Xtem ` 4 ' . lea �Lfi ntt n "w ers'the", pirbli comment peticicE is'closed,hr i thereaRer,'tp further pL c it Y7�.#i.A SOUIE u.� 0l T T11i's ' 'T� t1�� a �s NOTs alp tMUNI`l `.,f 0RUM',theP+�a�!or will cats for anyibne R p the atidaipge �x ��n `i5 3 z�t'h t e,.Council to F +t M : ase a61"JYU ` Ie pLtL11 atCe t€S {) 1Zet ' , (:&e-ouur name as l,adi �ess �tu re_ f3a "business Vl- w � truerMl + fin t e oda ay;be brought to the `tiuneifi' attenCion. A maximum of3or Ctiinmunity' um(winless chaxcel b the Coaincil). 1 2y at K g r �O Ai ITEll�IS PI.EICED ON,,At1l3A K , s k `tu tnultrs totne�Aenda must be in the�ce taf the City Mather,ten days �s, reed . #fie Coiinc�lx t it . Stiuld,y.4u have a mater you wish to bring before the ouncif, please tl`tir brim a vvrrtteir'cbmrnasn cation to the City Manager's o#�e ii City Hal(prior to the,deadline. ; s �t 3 me " P cI 11, a 4 fX ?,t d� L 4 , 'r 4 k I iY K 4 Y rt t",ifi.'Q . F � �` ` 4 { i �}k 4 i F t` is .f l 114 4 � x � if a � 0 ra 1 .r t .n � � :4 �S h 4 it* ) fr. .x - �.i. 1, ,,,"'"w f,;, ��,a ri � —ii' y'' ,c r t , , % 1 1. , 2 'Ilks Y$r µ I s of Y' if, u'a+' 4 a. k: ,° t € r # e5r� + w, + x3 - � \'F F 1 #9 H= S Y, = f , 11 e } �, s y-1 p.. r f' 'Yb�4� d .'t`-. {.,ye t -'4F �,- "n,t?a" :S £ E -t t, t '} t 1 wk'" 'FA !2 .�= 4 , Yr fi z '� i r.+ i� "# `t 11 I .1t '"" st; i _ { J I r ar 5 _ fr - D �. d�.t r'' "r- _ 4`rr pi & w 'tea, k a v t 4t `4 � 3 S 4! I •& fta•, r f - ° Rb4 syn i11 r. Ih t ° f f l i r s'' I' y z 4' .M, t '", " 9, 4 - ,"-I a + ,i �' t 4 r p,,. S e` s ,F s rt t t s y;� S, .,,..i a ,�; yy >�; +.; y°x Yr s a a s r .. Y a i� r.• Ar �r r n ki ,. < #.�x 41" t �, s.'�,7 f I4 . gf 5 � 7 ;�. P I .11Y x 4 ' k} % Z tt i �I4 ft Y;t 'r. X.. * 4'� } 1. a i� f t F a ,, a tY , A F �; fi fi .. 4 + „� g ,� .� + r 4 �B s+ ,i�R - �l �t- r �� iris` f , a Jar; . s'` f ^ .„, - ), 'rIt 1. t ,� s +r 6 - '.1 t.e " 3 a i � � � ° k y k 1 i ht f r h�Fv'. qsM Y �, 1 �'� t. ,y# b f�l l a _:-'a?-,,, t.` 0 4'a{Rie ' d "� ITEM NUMBER: ` A-1 DATE: 44t2S/2C1t1 MINUTE-amp _ ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING F } TUESDAY, APRIL 11, 2000 7:00 P.M. AXDEVELOQ MENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M. CLOSED SESSION: (Immediately following Redevelopment Agency Meeting) L Conference with legal counsel [Govt. Code§54956.9) Existing litigation: a, ,City:ofAtascadera v Atascadero Unified School District b. City of Atascadero v Kelly Gearhart -*0 2. Conference with labor negotiator(Govt. Code Sec. 54957:6) Agency Negotiator: City Manager , Employee organizations: Department Heads,Mid-Maragement/I'rofessional, Confidential,Atascadero Fire Captains, Atascaderb Firefighters, Service Employees Intl. Union Local 620,Atascadero Police Assoc. City Attorney PGy Hanley announced there were no reportable actions taken in Closed Session. Zr RE 'GU LAR SESSION,7:00 P.M.: Mayor Johnson called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. and Council Member Luna led the T Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Council Members Arrambide, Clay, Luna, Scalise and Mayor Johnson Absent: None Viers Present: City,{Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson Staff Psent: City Manager'Wade McKinney,Police Chief Dennis Hewood,Fire Chief ' Mike McCain,Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry,Public Works Director Steve Kahn,Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard, d k ` Pier Warren�Fr :d Qity Attorney Roy lWey f r y ' k 1 ' �rc�agAp 12 ,�`Alct +al.Awareness,Month ,°' w 1phnson react the Proclamatior•and Dil!McGuireNorth,County gdmeetion� pt ed the " 'e, adero Ave., ed the City of Atcadero for tir esaton. ice It.��on for Riff Zimmerman... � r Johnson gla u ,to.MrsJoyce Zinar r for Lill Zimmerman"',.service to Ae 060"M My. t pity Manager,Wade money a sial presentation Bracy Cherry for his service to Actin blit orb Director. He also presented Brady's wife with a bouquet of lacknow—ledgina the sacrifices iiiadelo'belp,Brady. 3 „ thanked „. the Council and the citizwsfor all the assistance he received while 111)14 fob } � VOXHUNl t ens ,65 ;Coutr Club,Drive tiled abnutacheving'more honorable citizens f Rkilka 4200 P*rtola Road thahke4 lhe,+City Count and Brady Cherry'for.the isgJof Portola Roac I e, 5 Cid:Morro RoadEast, stated .City Attorney gavip a presentadon�t � uncil pa ti that was not listed on tlae agenda She,suggested that in the Axtur the C ld blicly r •such presentations in the Cb i, cnda.so that t public can es 'Shy also a pressed lir con rn II for the State Hospital iwas not publicly noticed. She understands that the,City is not the Lead Agency but that<the City check intb.the Sue's lack of compliance with CEQA. on lis:O"Ke-efe for bringing the issue to the Council's notice,anal he stated "thatilhey to,ta&16,the,�State regarding the matter, hiADVOI.Planner WakrenFrace announced that the copy of the,FIR:came in today. AA e665Country Club Drive,a his convern for the excessive disposal of landfills. t ` o l Member Luna stated'that he will:take Mr. Jaz enn's cancel to the Integrated Waste t A.t � A). a A - Mayor Johnson closed the Public Comment period COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENT AND REPORTS: Council Member Scalise congratulated the City's staff for their accomplishments as Atascadero was rated the highest in the County for customer service. Council Member Clay announced that he attends the Youth Task Force meetings. He commented that it is important that the older generation make contact with the younger generation and encouraged everyone to reach out to our young people. Council Member Luna asked and received from the City Attorney clarification on the issue of Adult Books stores in Atascadero. A. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. City Council Minutes—March 28, 2000 ■ City Clerk recommendation: Council approve the City Council minutes of March 28, 2000 [City Clerk] 2. Zone Change 99001 — 8930 Junipero Avenue (Bunyea) ■ Fiscal Impact: Negligible ■ Staff recommendation: Council introduce for second reading by title only and adopt the attached draft Ordinance, approving proposed Zone Change 99001, changing the zoning of the project area shown on Exhibit A from RSF-Y to RSF-X. [Community& Economic Development] 3. Final Parcel Map #99002 /AT 99-040—6105 San Anselmo Road (Wilson Land Surverys / Gearhart) ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendations: 1. Council accept the Final Parcel Map 999002; and 2. Council accept a 6-foot wide Public Utility Easement contiguous to the San Anselmo Road property line. [Community & Economic Development] 4. Final Parcel Map 499005 /AT 99-012—6205 San Anselmo Road (Wilson Land Surveys / Gearhart) ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendations: L Council accept the Final Parcel Map #99005; and 2. Council accept a 6-foot wide Public Utility Easement contiguous to the San Anselmo Road property line. [Community & Economic Development] 5. September 1999—Accounts Payable & Payroll ■ Fiscal Impact: $1,048,772.43 ■ Staff recommendation: Review and approve [Administrative Services] CC 04/11/00 Page 3 0 J 6. October 1999—Accounts Payable & Payroll ■ Fiscal Impact: $804,371.94 ■ Staff recommendation: Review and approve [Administrative Services] 7. November1999—Accounts Payable & Payroll ■ Fiscal Impact: $891,130.82 ■ Staff recommendation: Review and approve [Administrative Services] MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Clay to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. Draft Ordinance in Item #A-2 will be Ordinance No. 372. B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. Information Bulletin A. Atascadero State Hospital EIR Review. Principal Planner Warren Frace gave a brief staff update on the Atascadero State Hospital EIR Review. Council Member Luna asked why a more thorough review was not done. Mr. Frace replied that it was based on direction given by Council to go no further do to lack of public support. Council Member Luna asked if we have a plan if Atascadero becomes a more probable site for the project. Mr. McKinney commented that we would already have, if chosen, a greater environmental impact. Principal Planner Warren Frace answered questions of the Council. PUBLIC COMMENT Lon Allan, Atascadero News, stated that Imperial County is strongly opposed to the development of the project in their area. Mayor Johnson closed the Public Comment period. B. General Plan Update Status Principal Planner Warren Frace gave a brief staff update on the General Plan Update. CC 04/11/00 Page 4 D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: S.L.O. Council of Governments/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide announced there will be a reception for State Director of Cal Trans at Hunter Ranch on April 13, 2000. Also, SLORTA is having a joint meeting with APCD in May. _Economic Opportunity Commission Council Member Scalise announced that they just completed participation in Homeless Awareness Week. North County Homeless Coalition Council Member Luna announced they will be meeting Thursday at 3:30 p.m. at the Library. E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: City lerk City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson announced that the ad hoc committee meeting requested by Mayor Johnson is scheduled for Monday, April 24, 2000, at 2:00 p.m. F. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Johnson adjourned the meeting at 8:05 p.m. to the Special Meeting scheduled on Thursday, April 13, 2000 at 10:30 a.m. MEETING RECORDED BY AND MINUTES PREPARED BY: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Melanie Whaley, Deputy City Clerk CC 04/11/00 Page 5 0 0 5 ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 04/25/2000 n ill Big @'fl 1918 @ 107-9 cm°' i� Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Fire Department Weed Abatement Program RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council adopt the proposed Resolution, declaring vegetative growth and/or refuse a public nuisance, commencing proceedings for the abatement of said nuisances, and placing all abatement fees on the San Luis Obispo County Special Tax Assessment for the fiscal year 2000-2001 Tax Roll. DISCUSSION: City Code, Section 6-13.03, addresses the abatement of vegetative growth and/or refuse, which constitute a hazard. Adoption of the proposed Resolution is the first step in this annual program, which requires council action. Of the City's 9,382 parcels, Exhibit "A" (Vegetative Growth) lists 1,919 parcels that have been identified to have vegetative growth that may become a public nuisance. Exhibit"B (Refuse) lists 65 parcels that have been identified to contain refuse that are a public nuisance. Both exhibits are on file in the office of the city clerk. The initial inspection of parcels was completed during the first week of April. FISCAL IMPACT: Costs involved in administering this program are recovered through the 100% administrative fee, which is placed on the San Luis Obispo County Special Tax Assessment for the fiscal year 2000- 2001 Tax Roll. ALTERNATIVES: No alternative is recommended. ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Resolution Vegetative Growth Notice Refuse Notice Vegetative Growth/Refuse (Year Round)Notice OOG PROPOSED RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DECLARING VEGETATIVE GROWTH AND/OR REFUSE A PUBLIC NUISANCE, COMMENCING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ABATEMENT OF SAID NUISANCES, AND PLACING ALL ABATEMENT FEES ON THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SPECIAL TAX ASSESSMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001 TAX ROLL The City Council` of the City of Atascadero, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. That vegetative growth and/or refuse are a public nuisance and hereby.declare to be such for the reasons that vegetative growth may attain such a large growth as to become a fire menace and/or drainage restriction,when mature, and said refuse may become a public nuisance, thereby creating a hazard to public health. The City Council of the City of Atascadero finds and declares that vegetative growth and/or refuse on specified parcels of property are seasonal and recurrent nuisances. Such seasonal and recurrent nuisances shall be abated in accordance with the provisions of City and State laws. No further hearings need to be held, and it shall be sufficient to mail a post card notice to the owner of the property as their address appears upon the current assessment roll. SECTION 2. A description of the parcels of lots of private property upon which, or in front of which, said nuisances exist, according to the official Assessment Map of said City of Atascadero, shall be posted annually in the office of the City Clerk and referred to as Exhibit A (Vegetative Growth)and Exhibit B (Refuse). SECTION 3. The City Clerk or designee is hereby ordered and directed to mail written notices of the proposed abatement to all persons owning property described in accordance with Section 6-13.08 of the Atascadero Municipal Code. SECTION 4. Pursuant to Section 6-13.10 of the Atascadero Municipal Code, the City Council shallhear and consider all objections or protests to the required removal of said vegetative growth and/or refuse. The City Clerk shall post a copy of the public hearing notice in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act. SECTION 5. Pursuant to Section 6-13.17 of the Atascadero Municipal Code, if the owner does not abate the hazard, it will be abated by the city contractor. The cost of abatement, 100% administrative fee, and county fee will be assessed upon the county property tax bill, and constitute a lien upon such land until paid. On motion by Councilperson and seconded by Councilperson , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: 00 Proposed Resolution Page Two ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: MARCIA M. TORGERSON, City Clerk RAY JOHNSON, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROY A. HANLEY, City Attorney 008 CITY OF A.TA SCADERO 1918 ® 1978 FIRE DEPARTMENT \A��ERo MAILING LABEL, E— ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (Situs Address) Dear Atascadero Property Owner: Weed abatement season has arrived and parcel inspections were performed throughout the City during the first two weeks of April. The City's Municipal Code, Section 6-13.08, requires this notification, which enables the Fire Department to abate dry noxious weeds in an effort to make our neighborhoods safer in the event of a fire. THE DEADLINE FOR COMPLIANCE IS JUNE 6, 2000 DISREGARD THIS NOTICE IF YOU HAVE CUT YOUR WEEDS AND WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE IN MAKING THE CITY OF ATASCADERO SAFER DURING THE FIRE SEASON. NOTICE TO DESTROY(VEGETATIVE GROWTH (NOXIOUS WEEDS) Notice is hereby given that on the 25`h day of April, 2000, the City Council passed a resolution declaring that vegetative growth(noxious weeds) constitute a fire hazard, which must be abated by the cutting of said vegetative growth (noxious weeds). If the owner does not abate the hazard, it will be abated by the City and the cost of removal assessed upon the County property tax bill and will constitute a lien upon such land until paid. Reference is hereby made to the resolution for further particulars and Ordinance No. 337. A copy of said resolution is on file in the office of the city clerk. All property owners having any objections to the proposed removal of the hazard are hereby notified to attend a meeting of the City Council of the City of Atascadero to be held May 23, 2000,when their objections will be heard and given due consideration. Dated: This 26h day of April 2000. /s/Michael P. McCain Fire Chief City of Atascadero, California 6005 LEWIS AVENUE - ATASCADERO,CA 93422 • (805)461-5070 FAX(805)466-2907 CITY OF ATASCADS - is 1979 RO \ FIRE DEPARTMENT � MAILING LABEL E- ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (Situs Address) Dear Atascadero Property Owner: Refuse inspections were performed throughout the City during the first two weeks of April. The City's Municipal Code, Section 6-13.08, requires this notification, which enables the Fire Department to abate all refuse that may create health hazards in our neighborhoods. THE DEADLINE FOR COMPLIANCE IS JUNE 6,2000 DISREGARD THIS NOTICE IF YOU HAVE REMOVED YOUR REFUSE AND WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE IN MAKING THE CITY OF ATASCADERO A MORE SAFE AND HEALTHY COMMUNITY NOTICE TO REMOVE REFUSE Notice is hereby given that on the 25th day of April 2000, the City Council passed a resolution declaring that refuse constitutes a health hazard, which must be abated by the removal of said refuse. If the owner does not comply, it will be removed by the City, and the cost of the removal assessed upon the County property tax bill, and will constitute alien upon such land until paid. Reference is hereby made to the resolution for further particulars and Ordinance No. 337. A copy of said resolution is on file in the office of the city clerk. All property owners having any objections to the proposed removal of the health hazard are hereby notified to attend a meeting of the City Council of the City of Atascadero to be held on May 23, 2000, when their objections will be heard and given due consideration. Dated: This 26t'day of April 2000. /s/Michael P. McCain Fire Chief City of Atascadero, California Please retain this notice for any related communications 6005 LEWIS AVENUE ATASCADERO,CA 93422 • (805)461-5070 FAX(805)466-2907 012 CITY OF ATASCADERO= 19181979 FIRE DEPARTMENT MAILING LABEL E— ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (Situs Address) Dear Atascadero Property Owner: An inspection was made on the above stated parcel and your property was identified to be in violation of Ordinance No. 337 and Uniform Fire Code (UFC) Section 1103.2.4. The City's Municipal Code, Section 6-13.08, requires this notification, which enables the Fire Department to abate all vegetative growth and/or refuse that may create a fire or health and safety hazard(s) in our neighborhoods. We have identified: NOTICE TO REMOVE VEGETATIVE GROWTH(NOXIOUS WEEDS) AND/OR REFUSE Notice is hereby given that on the 25" day of April, 2000, the City Council passed a resolution declaring that refuse/vegetative growth(noxious weeds) constitutes a health hazard, which must be abated by the removal of said refuse / vegetative growth (noxious weeds). If the owner does not comply within 30 days of the date of this letter, it will be removed by the city, and the cost of the removal will be billed to the property owner directly, or assessed upon the county property tax bill, and will constitute a lien upon such land until paid. For further particulars, reference is hereby made to the Resolution, Ordinance No. 337, and UFC Section 1103.2.4. A copy of said resolution is on file in the office of the city clerk. Dated: This day of 2000 /s/Michael P.McCain Fire Chief City of Atascadero, California If you have any questions,please contact the City of Atascadero Fire Department at 805.461.5070 6005 LEWIS AVENUE • ATASCADERO,CA 93422 • (805)461-5070 • FAX(805)466-2907 013 ITEM NUMBER: A-3 y N o '® 1 ■ DATE: 04/25/2000 1913 e �e Atascadero City Council Staff Report— Community Development Department Acceptance of Final Parcel Map # 98007/AT 98-109 5405 Olmeda Avenue (Pearson / Vaughan Surveys) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends: 1. Council accept the Final Parcel Map#98007; and 2. Council accept a blanket Public Utility Easement underlying the un-built portions of the parcel. DISCUSSION: Tentative Parcel Map #98007 was approved by the Planning Commission on December 1, 1998. The approval allowed for the conversion of one single family residence and three apartments into condominiums through an air-space (condominium conversion) subdivision. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66440 each approving legislative body must approve the Final Map and accept, accept subject to improvement or reject, on behalf of the public, any real property offered for dedication for public use in conformity with the terms of the offer of dedication. A Public Utility Easement is being offered on Final Map #98007 to fulfill a Condition of Approval issued by the City. All other Conditions of Approval imposed by the Planning Commission have now been satisfied and the only remaining requirement is that the City Council accept the offer of dedication for the Public Utility Easement. FISCAL IMPACT: None ! ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A--Approved Tentative Parcel Map 014 Attachment A Final Parcel Map 98007 (AT 98-109) Approved Tentative Map '-•'•�---�-•- 5405 Olmeda Avenue Pearson /Vaughan Surveys 01, Yr..+rel. -� , y�1�,V ^• . _ - Old♦ 5.�~ / -•^. l 0 O!* IL w.w. M• RA F t r^ N ."Rc/�<.,,,a.r. rr*�.7'f1 '1•'.':�! ,,,1 w'` '• \� rnR.wt.s-...... /I h �<��' _ f. .*:. 4•.t ��.:-✓' \ f.rw«� i.� , ♦ `` i•rl�wfr•lfyf bwv1Jlr f<1f Vff.►,f^/�• 1'••1".g v \\\ 3 1e'r.1/ Rf�'• �r.h \\ �/ u/row-frlJto T'aarY�:r,Yi.HNit .'.,•I..'�.�'.{ \ ,\ \ \•. �<frfy4 tl.�[.i \ 4r1Y^L 4t w_RLr�y --VI ~• IPI`=, \`. \. ...� 1vrsf•wf ` ruw..rr+fo �. ., .�\� '' \\\.. M+t++Iw+J `"1V +; � O r.•�..0 >I#' - -- r 4.Jwt<.rra \ \' lfr.r♦.,,./ • i` L ► rw' w w.f11rt1.41--•� (-2 (►1 Rwnr /:./(tR w •+.l ,/'� \`\ 67~�.• Y�✓f.•.Tf.YtW� r � .t as ♦117; :O 7}�.` O R y�lZ.�'�5.r ►w ' Dy1/f f.Gti h ,�`{O• .'�+' :• � I � I t 'irk .,:�-..��• .�.-L/t/.- �'► :. t ! i.'?°. - I.rw�.. • 00 t•td0•7'fefr t •xw: /�-. .. •rCo*i.�ss.J<..1.1.rK , •• _� c.-..<..I a.e.1.r- - —�' "•'.� 1 •1 .t i l tr. •.� fir, ,H. yly+-: f:1r�ur wlrlty.t __ � W-•If i1+•Vl21 IJ I/.1.1 f.JP AVS' C 1-5 ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 04/25/2000 iris c. s ia7 _ Atascadero City Council Staff Report - City Manager's Office Office Furniture Purchase RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council approve purchase of office furniture from Russco in the amount of $12, 722.14. - DISCUSSION: In an effort to reorganize City Hall to better facilitate customer service, the City Council, City Clerk, City Treasurer, City Attorney and City Manager offices are re-locating to the third floor. The remodeling required to accomplish this move has been handled by the Building Maintenance Division of the Community Services Department. The existing furniture in these offices is almost entirely 20 years old and well worn. Some of the pieces are still in good shape and will be moved to the third floor or given to other departments as needed. Staff has received three bids for new furniture for these offices (see attached chart). As can be seen in the chart, Russco is the lowest bidder. Since the receipt of these bids, staff has made some adjustments to the requested list as follows: 1. Chosen a less expensive office furniture line. 2. Added seven desk chairs to the list. I Eliminated City Council conference table and chairs from the list, as the City Attorney is going to loan his conference table and chairs to the City. ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 04/25/2000 The new Russco Quotation with the above-mentioned adjustments included is as follows:= RQQM ,NAIYIE ... DETAILS , PRICE 302A City Council Desk, chair, credenza, bookcase, guest $1815.21 chairs 303A City Attorney Desk,return, guest chairs $807.06 310A Admin.Asst./City Clerk Desk, chair, credenza, bridge, bookcase, $1,919.24 guest chairs 310B City Manager Desk chair $329.26 311 City Manager Reception 2 desks, 2 bridges, 2 credenzas, 1 shell $3,660.44 desk, 4 guest chairs, 3 desk chairs 312A Asst. City Manager Desk chair, 2 guest chairs $787.21 312B CM Conference Room Table, 8 chairs $2,835.69 MISC. All offices Seven keyboard roll-out trays $568.03 `TOTAL $-12,722:14 FISCAL IMPACT: $12,722.14 ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adjust the requested list of items. 2. Do not authorize the purchase of new furniture ATTACHMENTS A. Request for Quotes Table B. Quotation 017 00000 0p0000000- 00000000 {0000 ?000? V1 VI h h h V� O O O vl V1 O O+ h +n O O 'n O ,'O O O O n V-1 O O W N 00 .r Q1 �6 r 00 06 M Vl N M -+ 7 :`M 00 00 b O, ,Zr b C 7 3 M ^+ N 7 00 C, O� W N N00 7 O b 7 v1 M O\ 7 -+0, 7 7 '/1 ::O\ N h W) N In N M -,t vn U1 b v1 N N M N N j � k s � E 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 o 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o vi v o 0 0 0 ato 0 0 o o g o o r o o 0 0 �;o o �<0 0 0 w yb b t� vi N N p p O O� g 7 N M p O, p N oo M p rq 0 p 7 M 7 t� r/1 W w 0 O p 7 7 p g b b N 7 p vl p •.O 7 p "..O O p F•" b N b M M ',b b b b M ;f- b M b 7 b 7 O L y ONi' e TI., -rM - 7 N Vl vl Cp iV N u_ x d v, N N o b 7 00 b b Q o o b x o M N Q b N b N h h a h O W h h O O M O N O W O b M O W n W 00 Q\ M 00 F M 00 00 M M 00 V1 b i 7 7 O 00 b Vl 1n N W ,:'n 00 CA d N 7 N 7 7 y t� o0 00 ""' N N 7 'of b { O •--' 7 M 4 h --' oo •� M !00 0o M U b N b M M r"'n Vl b b M [, b M -+ b R 7 00 00 N r4 co w C 7 7 wad x � r q s P i � � E F ry .-. ry ry ry } ry Q 4 4 o ; � 3 O 00° Oj b a n Vl (�M 0 [- 00 I 00 M7 N N oo7 m 0) 00 1� N N 00 00 b 7 7 00 N i(� 00 7 ^r M r 070 .�. 00 N N N N N N N 777 t'- N N N N N O *.V O N N N N O M N N O 7 7 7 0 7 1 7 r V 7 7 7 7 O V 0.1 13, 01 D\ 7 Q\ o(11Q\ 110, D\ T 101, 7 s o0 00 s Ok O+ 12, 7 V1 t ao 0o h?C7, a\ 7 h r,C7, (7, v) 4 C C C C C c C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C A C C G C C C 67 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 s" 0 0 : 0 0 0 O O k 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � xLL7xxx �'J". ��." 5." xxx57 ��." �" ixxx .`CT. txxx ; xxxx 'xx �`17i w tii V ¢ t S U z lk p A G-i XW X ; ti l a C'4 ? `b° ' o CO F y W 7 w v Cam v ks b i'0 F ry y b rp O. O 0 N V � C � H � N � iC N W N 00 .0)".O C °0 ?•� t E 0 � �° [ 5 x � tv�� v b b .°.1co M U 7 v F E O UO OO b � C 00 O t' r t AC7U �4WACA AQ0.1VUa4 {FW4AUcaJCV'FmU ;.An' 3CU A0xU .` x t o o t E _ a U U ; o �V UIQ OG Q 0 0 0 ' W CO W j Q Q Q Q {ro c0 ¢1 j O_ O_ O_ O_ O O i •--' -+ N .N. N N N N r<4 N N N M M M M M M M 4•-•� •--� -+ --� 0 0 0 0 0 :0 0 0 0 0 0 0 !0 0 0 M M M M M M M M M M cn M 1,M M c M M M M M M M M :M M M M M M M 04/06/200 14:59 805-5478444 RIJS13CO SLO PAGE 02 aG 2240$0,THORNBURG ST. 0 30�ib�A 80.M7GMRA ST, SANTA LM LA.CA.00 SAN U JIS 0800,CA.03401 (80)M-1311 W5)6474M aaMrpwRrae0fl.�ei11 FAX(404)92#1-20UFAX(806)54744" QUOT A- TIONP -avlo Sam Ta. no 1o, RTY OF ATASCADERO _ DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES DOCK TO DOCK SHIPMENT 6500 PALMA AVENUE ATASCADERO CA 93422 Acoount No. terms purd,pee order Nnm�er Contsd were lat+olw Ftai+lnber Rona Humber O Cash R.O. # MARCIA 461-9)74 i 461-7612 d C.O.Q. ❑ Chage swe"W"n l6otrdns I Quote Deft Older Munitw C3cr•dit Card LINDA ' SHIP DIRECT DOCK TO DOCK 4-6-00 Qh pelt MMwbar I t?MMptlnn tMit tMcw TOW Prim SUMMARY OF QUOTATIONS i. QUOTE # 1 f MARCIA'S OFFICE $ 1.919.24 r2. QUOTE# 2 RECEPTION ROOM $ 3,660.44 3. 'QUOTE # 3 CONFERENCE ROOM T ( $2,835.69 4 QUOTE #4— COUNCIL OFFICE $2,931.68A S. QUOTE # 5 I CTTY ATTORNEY OFFICE $ 807.06 6. _ t QUOTE # 6 KEYBOARDS $ 568.03 t pair>rsrrns ms rbe 10 data OJt C.olfMx Mrr++a mar cpp+r•a+f+r va w ee alstsrpse subsow d 1112%pct rr►o o on adeaKlewo Mwoices�wit as a1lort Wo bes IM 00 adon opals. $ 12,722.24 Any ow*w msy alai(M sstrisd is County ct so"i wwre Cawbiewie Marts owxict, Buyer Wsa vor pwrerdas perwo to tb aw. Tex t$ INCLUDED Air Is Woxkw" days anar credit spprowri or wgsipt o1 dwwn p r prem fi�q�lt $ INCLUDED Than"for yvor can>tdder>sHcrts of Russco t br- DOW Labor $ ----------------- Tis TOTAL $ 12,722.14 019 ITEM NUMBER: B—1 login ® DATE: 04/25/2000 r9m 1979 Atascadero City Council Community Development Department—Staff Report Robles Avenue Four Unit PD-7 Overlay Zone Change 99007, Master Plan of Development (CUP 99022), Tentative Parcel Map 99010 (N.W.C. Robles Avenue & Sombrilla Avenue/ Shores) RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission recommends Council: 1. Adopt the Draft Resolution, certifying the proposed Negative Declaration; and, 2. Introduce the Draft Ordinance, for first reading by title only to approve Zone Change 99007; and, 3. Adopt the Draft Resolution, approving the Master Plan of Development (CUP 99022) subject to Conditions of Approval; and, 4. Adopt the Draft Resolution, approving Tentative Parcel Map 99010 subject to Conditions of Approval. DISCUSSION: Background.- The proposed project was originally considered by Planning Commission on March 21, 2000 with four, one-bed room units. The Commission determined that a two- bedroom housing product would be more appropriate in this location and provide a greater community benefit. The Commission referred the project back to staff for analysis as a two- bedroom project. Staff determined that the project could qualify for a 25% density bonus that would allow for two-bedroom units. The project was renoticed and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on April 4, 2000. The Commission's minutes and resolutions are attached for reference. No public testimony in opposition to the project was introduced during either of the Planning Commission hearings. Summary: The proposed project consists of an application from Jimmie D. Shores (PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family) to RMF-10 / PD-7 (Residential 040 ITEM NUMBER: F3- DATE: 04/25/2000 Multi-Family with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development (CUP 99022), and a four-lot residential tentative parcel map to allow the construction of 4 detached, two-bedroom, single family residential units with a 25% affordable housing density bonus. The project is proposed on the northwest corner of Robles Avenue and Sombrilla Avenue. 1. Applicant: Jimmie Shores 2. Representative: Bob Fisher 3. Project Address: N.W.C. of Robles and Sombrilla Avenues APN 030-011-015 4. General Plan Designation: LDMF (Low Density Multi-Family) 5. Zoning District: RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family) 6. -Site Area: 19,100 square feet 7. Existing Use: Vacant 8. Environmental Status: Proposed Negative Declaration Posted September 1, 1999 Analysis of Planning Issues 1. Affordable Housing Density Bonus This project was originally considered by the Planning Commission on March 21, 2000. The Commission referred the project back for staff to analyze the potential for the project to be revised to have two-bedroom units with the granting of an affordable housing density bonus. Section 9-3.175(f) of the zoning ordinance allows the Planning Commission to grant a density bonus of up to 25% of the project density for projects that provide affordable housing to low and moderate income persons. Based on the following calculations the project would require a 22% density bonus to allow four, two-bedroom units on the site. Currently the site has an entitlement for 3.28, two-bedroom units. Existing site area 19,100 square feet Area required per 2-bed unit 5808 sf x 4 units= 23,232 square feet Existing site entitlement 19,100 sf/ 5808 sf/unit= 3.28 two-bedroom units Density Bonus Requirement 22% x 3.28 units = 4.0 two-bedroom units The purpose of the density bonus is to guarantee the provision of affordable housing. Currently the project is intended to sell at market rates between $139,000 to $149,000 which generally correspond with the upper end of the affordability scale for a 3-4 person moderate income - 021 ITEM NUMBER: Ica— 1 DATE: 04/25/2000 family. The following condition was added to the parcel map to guarantee one of the units is affordable to a moderate income family for a period of 15-years: Recommended Map Condition*4 Prior to, or concurrently with recordation of the final map, the applicant shall record a deed restriction against one of the parcels, restricting the sales price or rent of that dwelling to not exceed the income limits of a"moderate income family" as defined by the County of San Luis Obispo Affordable Housing Standards for a period of 15-years. (The actual sales price of the unit will fluctuate based on interest rates and the ability of a moderate income individual to qualify for a loan.) 2. Project Summary/PD-7 Consistency The proposed project consists of 4 detached, single family units on individual lots that will be developed under the requirements of the PD-7 overlay district. Each unit will have a maximum of two-bedroom and a 1000± square foot living area. All units will have a two car attached garage with two additional uncovered spaces provided in the driveway. Each unit is consistent the PD-7 requirement of providing a minimum 40% parcel landscaping and building foot prints of less than 35% of the parcel area. An additional two off street parking spaces are provided for guest use. A Master Plan of Development will cover all site development and architectural design standards for the project. The Master Plan of Development will be approved in the form of a Conditional Use Permit as required by the Zoning Ordinance. Amendments to the Master Plan of Development can be made by the Planning Commission, in the future, independent of Council action. Proposed Project Summary Site Feature Description Square Footage Parking Percentage Building Foot Prints 4 one bedroom dwelling units 5808 s.f. 30% Site Paving Driveways/Parking 5658 s.f. 30% Landscaping Private Yards 7643 s.f. 40% Covered Parking 8 spaces Uncovered Parking 'includes 2 guest spaces 10 spaces Total 19109 s.f. 18 spaces 100% 3. Design and Appearance The Master Plan of Development will control site design and appearance issues including landscaping and architecture. The project has been designed with single story residential units that incorporate architectural materials found on neighboring historic houses. All street elevations will have lap siding with a stone wainscot treatment at the base. Architectural embellishments including Craftsman's style eave corbels, window shutters and covered front porches are included on all units. Two separate color schemes are proposed for the project. All trash storage and air conditioning condenser units will be screened from view behind fenced enclosures. The site landscaping plan includes a variety of native and flowering 02 ITEM NUMBER: �J DATE: 04/25/2000 accent trees. Shrub planter areas are proposed around the parking areas, street frontages and building foundations to accent the project's architecture. All landscape maintenance will be the responsibility of the individual property owner. 4. Oak Tree Preservation The site contains two native oak trees along the Sombrilla Road frontage. The project has been design and conditioned to preserve and protect the trees. The landscape plan has been designed to protect the area within the trees drip lines from over irrigation. The other non- native trees located on the site will be removed to accommodate site grading. 5. Project Benefits One of the required findings for the approval for a planned development rezone is that the project must"offer certain redeeming features to compensate for the requested modification." Due to the site's limited area no room is available on site for any common recreational facilities. However, it appears that the project will have a number of"redeeming features" which include the following: 1) each unit will have a private yard area that will allow for outdoor recreational opportunities, 2) architectural and landscape features of the project have been designed to enhance the project's appearance and benefit the surrounding neighborhood, and 3) the project will provide a small, two-bedroom, detached single family housing product that is in limited supply throughout the community. 6. Parcel Map A four lot parcel map is proposed as part of the project consistent with the Master Plan of Development. The parcel map has been conditioned by staff and the City Engineer to meet all City standards including street frontage improvements. The applicant will be required to record CC&R's for the map that will cover maintenance and access of common areas. Proposed Environmental Determination Staff has prepared an initial study for the project in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Based on the findings of the initial study, staff determined that the project does not have the potential to create any significant environmental impacts. A proposed negative declaration has been prepared and posted for the project. The Council will take the final action on the environmental determination. The Commission is recommending the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Conclusion • The proposed project is an attractive small lot residential project that will provide a two- bedroom housing product that is in short supply. • As a result of creative site planning, appears suited to the site and will provide a number of redeeming features. • It appears that all of the required findings for approval can be made. ITEM NUMBER: DATE: 04/25/2000 FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed project consists of a Planned Development Overlay that would allow individual units on separate parcels, but does not create an entitlement for additional residential dwelling units that do not currently exist. Therefore, the fiscal impact of the project would be expected to be negligible. ALTERNATIVES: 1. The Council may approve the project with modifications of any of the conditions of approval. 2. The Council may deny the zoning map amendment and the subdivision map. The parcel would retain its designation of Residential Multi-Family. 3. The Council may refer the item back to the Planning Commission or staff for additional analysis or modification. Direction on specific information or changes should be given to staff. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Attachment 1: Vicinity Map 2. Attachment 2: Existing Zoning and General Plan 3. Attachment 3: Proposed Zoning Map Amendment 4. Attachment 4: Planning Commission Minutes 5. Attachment 5: Planning Commission Resolutions 6. Attachment 6: Draft Resolution Adoption of the Negative Declaration ZC 99007, TPM 99010 7. Attachment 7: Draft Ordinance Approval of Zoning Map Amendment ZC 99007, TPM 99010 8. Attachment 8: Draft Resolution Approval of the Master Plan of Development ZC 99007, TPM 99010 9. Attachment 9: Draft Resolution Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 99010 10. Attachment 10: Draft Resolution Denial of Project 024 ITEM NUMBER: E-)-I DATE: 4/25/00 Attachment 1: Vicinity Map ZC 99007,TPM 99010 Lt AvA 'vu'` 5 �y SAN fk so 9C �F A �1. ' '< TA Oi � ` 'Iti0 Ap F o nom . n/NALJR < NS g tics AV Ay t n L f ~wr �'AC Ln 4'p9 Z i 1 CT y a �( Y STA Ik AV >•s9� r 4 YESAL P� s G n F ATASUDEAD ! e e f1�� Q v LE AVF� E w � �Y BG HS � � � " � v sr •�N � � oT �� 1� �:• � "'c� �F &a gNDR AVO r '- CLEMENTE 5AN MARC 4TT Rt1 AV R0p ?ice ¢ v v, n Site Location Northwest Corner of Robles Avenue and Sombrilla Avenue ��J n p•■nullman :. ll�?- m.��� �IAI.■,L ,� � ITEM NUMBER: 2 DATE: 4/4/00 CITY OF ATASCADEPO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting March 21, 2000 — 7:00 P.M. Action Minutes City Hall Rotunda Room CALL TO ORDER Chairman Carden called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and Commissioner Eddings led. the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Bentz, Clark, Eddings, Fonzi, Jeanes, Kelley, and Chairman Carden Absent: None Staff Present: Paul Saldana, Director, Community and Economic Development; and Warren Frace,Principal Planner PUBLIC COMMENT: None CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Time Extension Request- Vesting Tentative Tract Map # 25-89 (5805 Capistrano Ave., Hotel Park Group) Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution PC 2000-017, thereby approving a one- year time extension of Tentative Tract Map # 25-89 in compliance with Sections 11-4.23(a) and 11-4.33(b) of the Subdivision Ordinance. Commissioner Clark requested that item 2 be pulled from the consent calendar. MOTION: By Commissioner Eddings and seconded by Commissioner Bentz to approve item 1 of the Consent Calendar. 029 City of Atascadero Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting March 21,2000 Page 2 of 6 Ayes: Commissioners Bentz, Clark, Eddings, Fonzi, Jeanes, Kelley, and Chairman Carden Noes:None Motion passed 7:0 by a roll-call vote. 2. Conformance Determination for CUP 99-020 (RV Sales Lot 1200 El Camino Real Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. PC 2000-022 thereby approving the Conformance Determination of#99020 and allowing a permanent office building at 1200 N. El Camino Real subject to exhibits and conditions. Warren Frace, Principal Planner, presented the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. Commissioner Clark inquired as to the type of roofing material being used and if alternatives were considered. Mr. Frace indicated that it was considered; but it was determined to be cost prohibited. Chairman Carden asked if there was any public comment on this item. Michael Cross, on behalf of applicant, indicated they revised the project as suggested by the Commission and that the loan approval for the project was based on a particular budget which included a modular building. Mr. Cross requested that the landscaping requirement along the southern boundary be eliminated and that the landscape setback along Highway 101 be reduced from 8 feet to 4 feet. Mr. Cross also indicated that the modifications requested by the applicant would result in additional sales area from 8-10 units which would increase their sales potential. Commissioner Clark inquired about the cost difference between the roof material. Mr. Cross indicated it would be approximately $1,000 in additional costs. Commissioner Eddings inquired if there were other landscape modifications that could accomplish the same reduction that the applicant was proposing. Mr. Frace indicated that the trees along the southern boundary could be removed; however, the buffer should remain. Commissioner Clark requested alternative roofing material be considered. Commissioner Fonzi supported the reduction of the landscaping but not the elimination of the setback buffer. 030 City of Atascadero Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting March 21,2000 Page 3 of 6 MOTION: By Commissioner Kelly and seconded by Commissioner Eddings to adopt Resolution PC 2000-022 with the following amendments: elimination of landscape requirement along the southern property boundary and reduction of the landscape setback along Highway 101 from 8 feet to 4 feet. Ayes: Commissioners Bentz, Eddings, Jeanes, Kelley, and Chairman Carden Noes: Clark, Fonzi Motion passed 5:2 by a roll-call vote. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. Robles Avenue Four Unit PD-7 Overlay, Zone Change 99007, Master Plan of Development (CUP 99022),Tentative Parcel Map 99010 (N.W.C. Robles Avenue & Sombrilla Avenue/Shores) The proposed project consists of an application from Jimmie D. Shores (PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family) to RMF-10 / PD-7 (Residential Multi-Family with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development (CUP 99022), and a 4-lot residential tentative parcel map to allow the construction of 4 detached, one- bedroom, single family residential units. The project is proposed on the northwest corner of Robles Avenue and Sombrilla Avenue. Staff Recommendation: 1. Adopt Resolution No. PC 2000-018, recommending that the City Council certify the proposed Negative Declaration; and, 2. Adopt Resolution No. PC 2000-019, recommending that the City Council introduce an ordinance for first reading to approve Zone Change 99007; and, 3. Adopt Resolution No. PC 2000-020, recommending that the City Council approve the Master Plan of Development (CUP 99022) subject to Conditions of Approval; and, 4. Adopt Resolution No. PC 2000-021, recommending the City Council approve Tentative Parcel Map 99010 subject to Conditions of Approval. 021 City of Atascadero Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting March 21,2000 Page 4 of 6 • Warren Frace, Principal Planner, gave the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. PUBLIC COMMENT Jim Shores, applicant, indicated he agreed with the staff report and summary of the project. He indicated that he would like to see 2 bedroom homes, however, the standards did not provide that option. Commissioner Fonzi inquired about the price of the homes. Mr. Shores estimated the sales price to start between$139,000 and$149,000. Chairman Carden closed the Public Comment period. Chairman Carden asked why 2 bedroom units were not considered and what the process would be for the Commission to consider 2 bedroom units. Mr. Frace responded that 2 bedroom units are not allowed by the site's zoning standards, but could be considered with either a variance or a density bonus in conjunction with affordable housing restrictions. Mr. Frace stated that a public hearing would be required in order to grant the variance and that certain findings would need to be made. Commissioner Eddings inquired about the location of the high-pressure gas line. Staff responded that it is located in the right of way. Chairman Carden asked the applicant if he would be willing to have the project continued in order to have 2 bedroom units. Mr. Shores indicated his preference is to have the Commission take action tonight on the proposal. Commissioner Clark asked about the difference in parking requirements between the current proposal and 2 bedroom units. Staff responded that there would be no additional parking requirements. Chairman Carden asked if the Commission could approve the action this evening with a recommendation to the City Council that it grant a variance for 2 bedrooms. Staff indicated the Commission could only take the action as listed on the agenda. Commissioner Jeans indicated that the Commission could not take action on increasing the number of bedrooms and that the applicant is requesting the Commission take action to approve the project this evening. Chairman Carden asked staff to review the findings and requirements for the granting of a variance. Mr. Frace reviewed the requirements and findings and v32 City of Atascadero Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting March 21,2000 Page 5 of 6 advised the Commission that it appeared that the best approach for increasing the number of bedrooms would be an affordable housing option. Commissioner Eddings stated that in his opinion, the Commission could not make the findings for a variance. Commissioner Clark indicated his support for the project and that he agreed with Commissioner Jeans that this is not an appropriate action to consider without proper review by staff. Commissioner Bentz and Commissioner Fonzi stated their agreement with Commissioner Clark's statement. Chairman Carden asked the applicant if he would be willing to work with staff to. see if the project is eligible and could be modified to include 2 bedroom units. Mr. Shores indicated that he would be interested in pursuing this option; however, he wanted to ensure that the item would be heard at the next Commission meeting. MOTION: By Commissioner Jeanes and seconded by Commissioner Kelly to continue the item to the April 41 2000 meeting and for staff two review options for revising the project to have four, two-bedroom units. Ayes: Commissioners Bentz, Clark, Eddings, Fonzi, Jeanes, Kelley, and Chairman Carden Noes:None Motion passed 7.0 by a roll-call vote. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORTS 4. Smart Growth Principles for the City of Atascadero. Community Development Director Saldana presented the staff report and recommendation to the Commission to recommend adoption of the Smart Growth Principles to the City Council. MOTION: By Commissioner Jeanes and seconded by Commissioner Bentz to recommend to the City Council adoption of the Smart Growth Principles as presented. 0.3 3 City of Atascadero Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting March 21,2000 Page 6 of 6 Ayes: Commissioners Bentz, Clark, Eddins, Fonzi, Jeanes, Kelley, and Chairman Carden Noes:None Motion passed 7:0 by a roll-call vote. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS AND REPORTS Commissioner Kelly inquired about the Carlton Hotel and Home Depot. Mr. Saldana responded that the Carlton is undergoing an internal structural evaluation and design and that the Home Depot permit will be issued this week. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Carden adjourned the meeting at 8:22 p.m. to the next regular session scheduled for April 4, 2000. MEETING RECORDED BY AND MINUTES PREPARED BY: Paul M. Saldana Planning Commission Secretary C,34 ITEM NUMBER: DATE: 4/25/00 Attachment 5: Planning Commission Resolutions ZC 99007,TPM 99010 Planning Commission Recommendation Resolutions 035 APPhOVED APR 0 4 2000 ORIGINAL CITY OF ATasca^F=,^ RESOLUTION NO. PC 2000-018 FLANN11,4- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CERTIFY NEGATIVE DECLARATION 99027 PREPARED FOR ZONE CHANGE 99007 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 99010 FOR APN 030-011-015 (N.W.C. Robles Avenue & Sombrilla Avenue/ Shores) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jimmie D. Shores (PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family)to RMF-10/PD-7 (Residential Multi- Family with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a master plan of development, and a 4-lot residential tentative parcel map on APN 030-011-015; and, WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Negative Declaration 99027 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing following the close of the review period for the Initial Study and Draft Negative Declaration to consider its adequacy; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing on Tuesday, March 21, 2000 to consider the project, at which the Commission referred the item back to staff for consideration of an affordable housing density bonus; and, NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a public hearing held on Tuesday, April 4, 2000, hereby resolves to recommend that the City Council certify Negative Declaration 99027 based on the following Findings as shown on Exhibit A: (a) The Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA; and, (b) The Negative Declaration was presented to the Planning Commission, and•the information contained therein was considered by the Planning Commission, prior to recommending action on the project for which it was prepared; and, ' (c) The project does not have the potential to create a significant environmental impact when mitigation measures are incorporated into the project through conditions of approval; and, (d) The Draft Negative Declaration will be forwarded to the City Council, and the information therein contained will be considered by the City Council, prior to taking final action on the project. 0 36 Planning Commission Resolution 2000-018 April 4,2000 Page 2 of 3 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be delivered forthwith by the Planning Commission Secretary to the City Council of the City of Atascadero. On motion by Commissioner Fonzi, and seconded by Commissioner Eddings the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Bentz, Carden, Clark, Eddings, Fonzi and Kelley (6) NOES: none (0) ABSENT: Commissioner Jeanes (1) ABSTAIN: none (0) ADOPTED: April 4, 2000 CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA Harold L. Carden III, Chairperson Attest: Paul M. Saldana - Community Development Director i 037 Planning Commission Resolution 2000-018 April 4,2000 Page 3 of 3 Exhibit A Proposed Negative Declaration ZC 99007,TPM 99010 FILE , 1916,1," . M"' CITY OF ATASCADERO 7-9�> PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION#99027 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero,CA 93422 805/461-5035 (ENDORSED) APPLICANT: Jimmie D.Shores ACED PO Box 116 Atascadero,CA 93422 AUG 81 IM 434-4150 JLUE L n0D&11ALO,COUNTY CLFAK PROJECT TITLE: Zone Change 99007,Tentative Parcel Map 99010 3y Oar!ane A.Roberts DEPUTY CLERK PROJECT LOCATION: NW Corner of Robles Avenue and Sombrilla Avenue,Atascadero, CA 93422 APN 030-120-401 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed rezone to Planned Development Overlay Zone PD-7 and 4 lot Tentative Parcel Map to permit the construction of 4 detached,single family homes of 1550 square feet with one-bedroom. The project is located on a vacant lot within an established neighborhood of single family and multifamily housing. The lot has slopes below 10%with two mature native oak trees located along the Sombrilla Avenue frontage. Full urban services area available to the site. The General Plan Designation is Low Density Multi- Family(LDMF)and the Zoning District is RMF-10. The project is consistent with the maximum density permitted by the General Plan. FINDINGS: 1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment when mitigation measures are incorporated into the project. 2. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. 3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable. 4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. DETERMINATION: Based on the above findings,and the information contained in the initial study 99027(made a part hereof by reference and on file in the Community Development Department),it has been determined that the above project will not have an adverse impact on the environment.. PREPARED BY: Warren Frace,Planning Services Manager DATE POSTED: September 1,1999 PUBLIC REVIEW ENDS: September 20,1999 DATE ADOPTED: 038 7APPRbVED _ APR 0 4 2000 CITY of ATAscADE RESOLUTION NO. PC 2000-019 ORIGINJ RESV-00 PLANNING 4 OLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE ZONE CHANGE 99007 THEREBY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP DISTRICT OF APN 030-011-015 FROM RMF-10 (RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY) TO RMF-10/ PD-7 (RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY WITH A PD-7 OVERLAY DISTRICT) SUBJECT TO A MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT. (N.W.C. Robles Avenue & Sombrilla Avenue/ Shores) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jimmie D. Shores (PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family) to RMF-10/PD-7 (Residential Multi- Family with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and a 4-lot residential tentative parcel map on APN 030-011-015; and, WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is LDMF (Low Density Multi- Family; and, WHEREAS,the site's current zoning district is RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enact this amendment to the Zoning Map to protect the health, safety and welfare of its citizens by applying orderly development of the City; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Zoning amendments; and, - WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing on Tuesday, March 21, 2000 to consider the project, at which the Commission ' referred the item back to staff for consideration of an affordable housing density bonus; and, WHEREAS,the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on April 4, 2000, studied and considered Zone Change 99007, after first studying and considering the Draft Negative Declaration prepared for the project, and, 039 Planning Commission Resolution 2000-019 April 4,2000 Page 2 of 4 NOW, THEREFORE,the Planning Commission takes the following actions: SECTION 1.Findings for Approval of a Zone Change Creating a PD-7 Planned Development Overlay District. The Planning Commission finds as follows: a) Modification of development standards or processing requirements is warranted to promote orderly and harmonious development. b) Modification of development standards or processing requirements will enhance the opportunity to best utilize special characteristics of an area and will have a beneficial effect on the area. c) Benefits derived from the overlay zone cannot be reasonably achieved through existing development standards or processing requirements. d) Proposed plans offer certain redeeming features to compensate for the requested - modification. e) The project as conditioned will provide for one moderate income dwelling unit and is therefore entitled to a 25% density bonus. SECTION 2. Approval. The Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on April 4, 2000,resolved to recommend that the City Council introduce for first reading an ordinance that would rezone the subject site consistent with the following: a) Exhibit A: Zone Change Map 040 Planning Commission Resolution 2000-019 April 4,2000 Page 3 of 4 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be delivered forthwith by the Planning Commission Secretary to the City Council of the City of Atascadero. On motion by Commissioner Fonzi, and seconded by Commissioner Eddings the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Bentz, Carden, Clark, Eddings, Fonzi and Kelley (6) NOES: none (0) ABSENT: Commissioner Jeanes (1) ABSTAIN: none (0) ADOPTED: April 4, 2000 CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA Harold L. Carden III, Chairperson Attest: Paul M. Saldana Community Development Director s 041 I P_ Proposed Zoning District: RMF-10 PD-7 Not slow Donna#,_ EAPPROVED .� 0 4 2000 ORIGINAL ,Tp, RESOLUTION NO. PC 2000-020 LUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT (CUP 99022) FOR THE PD-7 OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT FOR APN 030-011-015. (N.W.C. Robles Avenue& Sombrilla Avenue/ Shores) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jimmie D. Shores (PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family) to RMF-10 /PD-7 (Residential Multi- Family with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and a 4-lot residential tentative parcel map on APN 030-011-015; and, WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is LDMF (Low Density Multi- Family; and, WHEREAS,the site's current zoning district is RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended that a site be rezoned to include a PD-7 overlay district which requires the adoption of a Master Plan of-Development; and, 0 WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Master Plan of Development; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing on Tuesday, March 21, 2000 to consider the project, at which the Commission referred the item back to staff for consideration of an affordable housing density bonus; and, WHEREAS,the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on April 4, 2000, studied and considered the Master Plan of Development(CUP 99022), after first studying and considering the Draft Negative Declaration prepared for the project, and 043 Planning Commission Resolution 2000-020 April 4,2000 Page 2 of 13 NOW,THEREFORE,the Planning Commission takes the following actions: SECTION 1. Findings for Approval of Master Plan of Development. The Planning Commission finds as follows: a) The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan and the City's Appearance Review Manual; and, b) The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Title (Zoning Ordinance) including the PD-7 Ordinance; and, c) The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use; and, d) That the proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the character or the immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development; and, e) That the proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be improved in conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the surrounding neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance with the Land Use Element. f) The project as conditioned will provide for one moderate income dwelling unit and is therefore entitled to a 25% density bonus. SECTION 2. Approval. The Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on April 4, 2000, resolved to recommend that the City Council approval of the Master Plan of Development(CUP 99022) subject to the following: a) EXHIBIT A: Conditions of Approval b) EXHIBIT B: Site Plan c) EXHIBIT C: Statistical Summary of Project d) EXHIBIT D: Landscape Plan e) EXHIBIT E: Grading and Drainage Plan f) EXHIBIT F: Grading Cross Sections g) EXHIBIT G: Elevations and Floor Plans h) EXHIBIT H: Exterior Colors and Materials Cr.:j 4 Planning Commission Resolution 2000-020 April 4,2000 Page 3 of 13 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be delivered-- 0 forthwith by the Planning Commission Secretary to the City Council of the City of Atascadero. On motion by Commissioner Fonzi, and seconded by Commissioner Eddings the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Bentz, Carden, Clark, Eddings, Fonzi and Kelley (6) NOES: none (0) ABSENT: Commissioner Jeanes (1) ABSTAIN: none (0) ADOPTED: April 4, 2000 CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA Harold L. Carden III, Chairperson Attest: - Paul M. Saldana Community Development Director - 01,415 Planning Commission Resolution 2000-020 April 4,2000 Page 4 of 13 EXHIBIT A: Conditions of Approval ZC 99007-PD-7 Master Plan of Development(CUP 99022) PLANNING SERVICES 1. The approval of this Master Plan of Development shall become final and effective following the end of the referendum period for zone change 99007(Rezone to RMF-10/PD-7). 2. Approval of this Master Plan of Development shall be valid concurrently with the life of Tentative Parcel Map 99010 and then indefinitely following final map. The Master Plan of Development approval shall expire and become null and void unless a final map is recorded consistent with the Master Plan of Development. 3. The Community Development Department shall have the authority to approve minor changes to the project the(1)increase the intensity of the project by less than 10%, (2)result in a superior site design or appearance, and/or(3)address a construction design issue that is not substantive to the Master Plan of Development. The Planning Commission shall have the final authority to approve any other changes to the Master Plan of Development and any associated Tentative Maps. 4. All subsequent Tentative Parcel Maps and construction permits shall be consistent with the Master Plan of Development contained herein. 5. All exterior elevations, finish materials and colors shall be consistent with the Master Plan of Development as shown in EXHIBIT G and EXHIBIT H. 6. All site work,grading and site improvements shall be consistent with the Master Plan of Development as shown in EXHIBIT B,EXHIBIT E and EXHIBIT F. 7. All site development shall be consistent with the maximum intensities described in the statical project summary as shown on EXHIBIT C. 8. Native oaks trees shall be preserved and protected during construction. A tree protection plan shall be approved and in place prior to the issuance of any construction permits. 9. A final landscape and irrigation plan shall be approved prior to the issuance of building permits and included as part of site improvement plan. The landscape plan shall include the location, variety and container size of all plant material. Site landscaping shall be consistent with EXHIBIT D at a minimum including the following: a) All exterior meters, air conditioning units and mechanical equipment shall be screened with landscape material. b) Building foundations and fence lines fronting public streets shall have a continuous shrub hedge planting treatment. 046 Planning Commission Resolution 2000-020 April 4,2000 Page 5 of 13 10. The storage area fence areas on Units A and D shall be recessed a minimum of 1-foot behind the street frontage edge of the garage. The enclosure fence shall be no taller than 5- feet in height and painted to match the house's exterior color. 11. All fenced yard areas shall be consistent with the locations and design indicated on the landscape plan. The yard adjacent of Sombrilla Avenue shall be not be enclosed with any fencing which exceeds 3-feet in height. 12. Prior to,or concurrently with recordation of the final map,the applicant shall record a deed restriction against one of the parcels restricting the sales price or rent of that dwelling to not exceed the income limits of a"moderate income family"as defined by the County of San Luis Obispo Affordable Housing Standards for a period of 15-years. -end of conditions- 0�� Planning Commission Resolution 2000-020 April 4,2000 Page 6 of 13 EXHIBIT B:Site Plan — ZC 99007—PD-7 Master Plan of Development(CUP 99022) �a•w ..1++.rw. . �""'°� Nom. � � �•'� USM We,.1 �.. A N, I , anc nr Pte.» o+n=o uw+wa u�wra i $ E PLAN Planning Commission Resolution 2000-020 April 4,2000 Page 7 of 13 EXHIBIT C:Statistical Summary of Project ` ZC 99007-PD-7 Master Plan of Development(CUP 99022) PROJECT DA TA PROJECT BREAKDOWN BY PARCEL: PROJECT TOTAL: 19, 110 S.F. PARCEL 1: 4,850 S.F BUILDING FOOTPRINT. 1,497 S.F. 30.99 PAVING / FLATWORK.• 1,414 SF. 29. 19 LANDSCAPING: 1.940 S.F. 40.09 PARCEL 2: 4,221 S.F. BUILDING FOOTPRINT.- 1,437 S.F. 34.09 PAVING / FLA TWORK. 1,096 S.F. 26.09 LANDSCAPING. 1,688 S.F. 40.07' PARCEL 3: 4. 118 S.F. BUILDING FOOTPRINT.• 1,437 S.F. 34.99 PAVING ./ FLATWORK. 1,034 S.F. 25. 19 LANDSCAPING. ' 1,647 S.F. 40.09 PARCEL 4: 5,91-9 S.F. BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 1,437 S.F. 24.39 PAVING / FLA TWORK. 2,114 S.F. 35.77' LANDSCAPING: 2,J68 S.F. 40.09 BUILDING BREAKDOWN: BUILDING FOOTPRINT.• 1,437 S.F. (UNITS B, C, & D) 1,497 S.F. UNIT A) LIVING SPACE: 996 S F. UNITS B, C, & D) 1.058 S.F. (UNIT A) GARAGE. 441 S.F. PARKING SPACES. COVERED SPACES: 2 AT EACH UNIT - TOTAL: 8 -UNCOVERED SPACES. 2 AT EACH UNIT - TOTAL: 8 GUEST SPACES. TOTAL • 2 TOTAL SPACES: 18 Planning Commission Resolution 2000-020) April 4,2000 Page 8 of 13 EXHIBIT D: Landscape Plan - ZC 99007-PD-7 Master Pian of Development(CUP 99022) .nw�a 44 Hers T" ry � w.uy�c� %1 � ., . Mir•r � i raa jr 4f►C ouea fl MT'' i . 1 wa LNoaAw Ne wongr 11 Imes . LANDSCAPE rVM � �Kwr ewN. 71TTYwia - �Klw.��wa•wrTw�/• �KAia�ws��lwswY�! Qaww�wl�.ww. • (1 w�pYiw ASR U .rnww.+rv��T wrws 1TKwnww+�rrw .........mow. aTr1Y��.Tlw wlaAIY1�AO�a. .Ya wrwl��rwa��w.wa�wa WM:Nl TMCO NO O RO Mom I*n ft=A./■•011 t i 0 MOn000 00 CMINI �IY:wlr# Tv"CAL :,� � ►` Vit^ � � iii iyt, t! �sE � =gip•�I �,� Planning Commission Resolution 2000-020 April 4,2000 Page 10 of 13 EXHIBIT F:Gradin Cross Sections - 9 ZC 99007—PD-7 Master Plan of Development(CUP 99022) t• lig lil �q w. It 1 sitm. •!3 t=�r P 99 F M It R �Y —;J p} ; .4 �l �I� ��I�i I�� 11i H �.� , fiui }41jig I _ ORIGINAL �r= ��7� I :t it .itl It t t j 1 t j GRADM AND DRA24WE PIAN —_ N 7 t 910fES FgouR IXiT F"a HIC.1 GC3LSI fi PWOM a s 81.M KJ%AM 030-M-M C"_EN004aerm00 tt� y � iReYI..MAI..I Oa.1/fi AYMI. /Q�{`�Ld,q G.O.BI �� 7 ^ r• N i MY OP ATASCAP 0 CA am r.wa „m,o,,, I .0 5 V V T Planning Commission Resolution 2000-020 1 April 4,2000 1 Page 11 of 13 EXHIBIT G:ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLANS -- ZC 99007—PD-7 Master Plan of Development(CUP 99022) < En J1 V I q r f �t ! 1• I ' I i � r 13 cY 1 117 IT i i ~ f 1 dW i ^ I { 11F, .� li so 1 �( 1� I ORIGI AL •,a.......amu........iw toBHtR4El.' G V J y: t. t it1l�� iiL J'!!!lttL�� lox \ ay" s-A- tB3, $ lii'4i. OWN �!4'a} S:� 7 i Sref�i � � ; {'�4�1�'�li>,. , 1 t�'•z' `t , r'� f I , -'�'tct--�t+" _r • �: s9�!�iil��,;'i�!,}�+ fi .� �� � � �'`: .r, I • i Y �y�� _ i�..j 4th - _ i{+�tf,j� f j pA :,�� e.E~ •! ppi 1'��1ail� It {tS�q( 1 �'�� F �� � .- :w!'Wa-d..r.� �,.- �U�di�F )� � � �1•, <t31�091a,9 X13 S if liq {{1{1{ 1 t � ygra. ;< �a '- }'e' ��r�..,"♦ +�;�` ; ire» F�19. k" 7a� a' 1 lYo.12� i ii i!!:•i�a::�"3�35� �;s e�a � .,F�; ;!,' ;� q, ,7t lig '� �sz •i ' r ._____COLOR AND_MATERIAL _BOARD FOR JIM -SHORES .4 UNIT P.U.D. PROJECT CORNER OF ROBLES AND-SOMBRILLA' AVENUES Exhibit H -- Exterior Colors and Materials ZC 99007/Master Plan of Development Planning Commission Resolution 2000-020 April 4,2000 Page 13 of 13 _ARCHITECTURAL-SERIES'-- ASPHALT SERIES'-_ASPHALT COMPOSITION SHINGLES Courtyard Tuscany 514 521 x , r Shaded ' Spruce § i . ^' do s Wood 515 fi � � ,E1 , �s lclet i 523 Sonoma 393 Mesa Tan 381 UNITS 'A' AND 'C' UNITS 'B' AND 'D' i r , A ;!, r 1 { X-55 FRENCH VANILLA(BASE 100) X-97 PACIFIC SAND(BASE 200) BODY (STUCCO AND SIDING), BODY (STUCCO AND SIDING), -. __TRIM, AND CONTRAST COLORS r .-TRIM, AND CONTRAST COLORS _ 1 'RIVER_ROCIC_CULTURED_STONE _.V_EIVEER _PER_ELEVATIONS C55 E OVED 4 2000ORIG!NAL ASCADE RESOLUTION NO. PC 2000=021NING i A SOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 99010 THEREBY ALLOWING A 4-LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF APN 030-011-015 CONSISTENT WITH THE PD-7 MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT (CUP 99022). (N.W.C. Robles Avenue & Sombrilla Avenue/ Shores) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jimmie D. Shores (PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family)to RMF-10 /PD-7 (Residential Multi- Family with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and a 4-lot residential tentative parcel map on APN 030-011-015; and, WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is LDMF (Low Density Multi- Family; and, WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family; and, WHEREAS,the Planning Commission has recommended that a site be rezoned to include a PD-7 overlay with a Master Plan of Development allowing a'4-lot subdivision of the site; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Tentative Parcel Map application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said application; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing on Tuesday, March 21, 2000 to consider the project, at which the Commission referred the item back to staff for consideration of an affordable housing density bonus; and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on April 4, 2000, studied and considered Tentative Parcel Map 99010, after first studying and considering the Draft Negative Declaration prepared for the project; and, Q�� Planning Commission Resolution 2000-021 April 4,2000 Page 2 of 9 NOW,THEREFORE, the Planning Commission takes the following actions: Section One. Findings of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero finds as follows: a) The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements. b) The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements. c) The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the Planned Development Overlay District#7 Master Plan of Development (CUP 99022). d) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. e) The site is physically suitable for the density of development proposed. f) The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. g) The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through, or the use of property within, the proposed subdivision; or substantially equivalent alternative easements are provided. h) The proposed subdivision design and type of improvements proposed will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public. g) The project as conditioned will provide for one moderate income dwelling unit and is therefore entitled to a 25% density bonus. SECTION 2. Approval. The Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on April 4, 2000,resolved to recommend that the City Council approval of the Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 99010) subject to the following: a) Exhibit A: Tentative Parcel Map 99010 b) Exhibit B: Conditions of Approval 05 Planning Commission Resolution 2000-021 April 4,2000 Page 3 of 9 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be delivered forthwith by the Planning Commission Secretary to the City Council of the City of Atascadero. On motion by Commissioner Fonzi, and seconded by Commissioner Eddings the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Bentz, Carden, Clark, Eddings, Fonzi and Kelley (6) NOES: none (0) ABSENT: Commissioner Jeanes (1) ABSTAIN: none (0) ADOPTED: April 4, 2000 CITY OF ATASCADERO CA Harold L. Carden III, Chairperson Attest: Paul M. Saldana 4- Community Development Director 058 Planning Commission Resolution 2000-021 April 4,2000 Page 4 of 9 Exhibit A:Tentative Parcel Map - TPM 99010 t y • i r s�o c* � � w• r y ft ~z'••R �9 \ car all I ti 4141 i:i Ili iii i=i MRs w Aim w w rrz � a• l 'LtvJ Planning Commission Resolution 2000-021 April 4,2000 Page 5 of 9 Exhibit B:CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Tentative Parcel Map 99010 Planning Services 1. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall be valid for twenty-four(24)months after its effective date. At the end of the period,the approval shall expire and become null and void unless a final map has been filed or a time extension granted. 2. The form of the Final Tract Map shall substantially conform with the approved Tentative Parcel Map shown in Exhibit A. 3. The tentative parcel map shall not be deemed approved until the ordinance approving Zone Change 99007 becomes effective. 4. Prior to, or concurrently with recordation of the final map the applicant shall record a deed restriction against one of the parcels restricting the sales price or rent of that dwelling to not exceed the income limits of a"moderate income family"as defined by the County of San Luis Obispo Affordable Housing Standards for a period of 15-years 5. All native trees in the proximity of street improvements will be preserved. Tree protection shall be installed prior to the issuance of permits for subdivision improvements. All tree protection shall be shown on improvement plans. 6. The applicant record CC&R's for the subdivision subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer, City Attorney and Planning Department. The CC&R's shall identify to the maintenance responsibilities of all private driveways, sewer facilities, drainage facilities, common parking areas, site lighting, landscape areas,fencing, and other common facilities. The CC&R's shall also state that each unit shall have no more than one bedroom and that all exterior colors, exterior materials, and yard fencing shall be consistent with the overall master plan of development. 7. The project shall be conditioned to comply with the following District regulations _ pertaining to the control of fugitive dust(PM-10). All site grading and demolition plans notes shall list the following regulations. A. All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall occur at least twice daily with ,. complete coverage,preferably in the late morning and after work is finished for the day. B. All clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation activities shall cease during periods of high winds (i.e. greater than 20 mph averaged over one hour) so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. C. All material transported off-site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. 0G0 Planning Commission Resolution 2000-021 April 4,2000 Page 6 of 9 D. The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. E. Permanent dust control measured identified in the approved project revegetation and landscape plans shall be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. F. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading shall be sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation becomes established. G. All disturbed areas not subject to revegetation shall be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders,jute netting, or other methods in advance by the APCD. H. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. In addition, structural foundations shall be completed as soon as possible following building pad construction. I. On-site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 mph for any unpaved surface. J. All unpaved areas with vehicle traffic shall be watered at least twice per day, using non-potable water. K. Streets adjacent to the project site shall be swept daily to remove silt which may have accumulated from construction activities so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust from leaving the site. City Engineer 8. All public improvements shall be constructed in conformance with the City of Atascadero Engineering Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or as directed by the City Engineer. 9. The applicant shall enter into an Plan Check/Inspection agreement with the City. All fees and invoices shall be paid in full prior to recordation of Final Map. 10. A six (6) foot Public Utility Easement(PUE) shall be provided contiguous to the Robles Avenue and Sombrilla Avenue property frontages. 11. Slope easements shall be provided on each side of the right-of-way as needed to accommodate cut or fill slopes. 12. The applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities. 13. The applicant shall install all new utilities (water, gas, electric, cable TV and telephone) underground. Utilities shall be extended to the property line frontage of each lot or its Planning Commission Resolution 2000-021 April 4,2000 Page 7 of 9 public utility easement. 14. The applicant shall monument all property corners for construction control and shall promptly replace them if disturbed. 15. All existing and proposed utility,pipeline, open space, or other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there are building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the final map. 16. Arelimin subdivision hall p i ary i s b son guarantees be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 17. The applicant shall provide notice either on the parcel map or by separate instrument recorded on, concurrently with, or prior to the recording of the parcel map that there are requirements for off-site and on-site improvements and that the construction of the improvements shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits or other grants of approval for development of the parcels. 18. Prior to recording the final map, the applicant shall acquire title or interest in any off-site land that may be required to allow for the construction of the improvements required by these conditions of approval. The applicant shall bear all costs associated with the necessary acquisitions. The applicant shall also gain concurrence from all adjacent property owners whose ingress or egress is affected by these improvements. 19. Prior to recording the final map,the applicant shall submit the drainage calculations necessary to demonstrate that existing downstream drainage facilities have adequate capacity to handle the total flow from the fully developed watershed without adverse affect on other properties. If downstream facilities do not have adequate capacity, the applicant shall design and construct improvements to the downstream facilities or the applicant shall detain storm water on-site in conformance with City Standards. 20. Prior to recording the final map, the applicant shall submit a map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set, forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval by the City in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 21. Prior to recording the final map,the applicant shall set monuments at all new property, corners and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by, certificate on the final map, that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. 22. Prior to recording the final map,the applicant shall pay all outstanding plan check/inspection fees. 23. Prior to recording the final map, the applicant shall submit a grading and drainage plan prepared by a registered civil engineer for review and approval by the City Engineer. Drainage from areas outside the subdivision boundary shall be conveyed across the 0 6%2 Planning Commission Resolution 2000-021 April 4,2000 Page 8 of 9 subdivision in private drainage easements. Drainage shall only 1 g g y cross of lines where private drainage easements have be provided. 24. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall design the following street improvements. Plans for street improvements shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. Plans shall be prepared by a regiestered civil engineer and shall be prepared in conformance with City Standards. R-value testing shall be done, and pavement section designed by a registered civil engineer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a) The northerly half of Robles Avenue shall be improved in conformance with City Standard 405 (local) along the entire property frontage, or as approved by the City Engineer. b) The westerly half of Sombrilla Avenue shall be improved in conformance with City Standard 405 (local) along the entire property frontage, or as approved by the City Engineer. c) The existing streets adjacent to the property frontage shall be overlayed to remedy an inadequate structural section or to remedy deteriorated paving surface as directed by the City Engineer. Transitions shall be constructed between the proposed improvements and the existing improvements as directed by the City Engineer. d) The minimum property line radius at the intersection of Robles Avenue with Sombrilla Avenue shall be 20-feet. 25. Prior to recording the final map, the applicant shall have the map reviewed by all applicable public and private utility companies (cable, telephone, gas, electric, Atascadero Mutual Water Company). The applicant shall obtain a letter from each utility company which indicates their review of the map. The letter shall identify any new easements which may be required by the utility company. A copy of the letter shall be submitted to the City. New easements shall be shown on the parcel map. 26. Prior to the parcel map being placed on the agenda for City Council acceptance,the map shall be signed by the City Engineer. 27. Upon recording the final map,the applicant shall provide the City with a black line clear Mylar (0.4 mil) copy and a blue line of the recorded map, 28. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall submit a grading and drainage plan prepared by a registered civil engineer for review and approval by the City Engineer. 29. Prior to the final inspection, all outstanding plan check and inspection fees shall be paid. 30. Prior to the final inspection,the applicant shall submit a written statement from a 063 Planning Commission Resolution 2000-021 April 4,2000 Page 9 of 9 registered civil engineer that all work has been completed and is in full compliance with the approved plans and the Uniform Building Code (UBC)prior to the final inspection. 31. Prior to the final inspection,the applicant shall submit a written certification from a registered civil engineer or land surveyor that all survey monuments have been set as shown on the final map. 32. Prior to the final inspection, the applicant shall submit a Mylar copy and a blue line print of as-built improvement plans, signed by the registered engineer who prepared the plans shall be provided to the City Engineer. Atascadero Mutual Water Company 33. The applicant shall obtain a will serve letter from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company to identify conditions of service prior the design of subdivision improvements. -end of conditions- Attachment 6: Draft Resolution Adoption of the Negative Declaration ZC 99007,TPM 99010 DRAFT COUNCIL RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ATASCADERO CERTIFYING NEGATIVE DECLARATION 99027 PREPARED FOR ZONE CHANGE 99007 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 99010 FOR APN 030-011-015 (N.W.C. Robles Avenue & Sombrilla Avenue/ Shores) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jimmie D. Shores (PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family) to RMF-10/PD-7 (Residential Multi- Family with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a master plan of development, and a 4-lot residential tentative parcel map on APN 030-011-015; and, WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Draft Negative Declaration 99027 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing on Tuesday, March 21, 2000 to consider the project, at which the Commission referred the item back to staff for consideration of an affordable housing density bonus; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing on Tuesday, April 4, 2000 to consider the project, at which the Commission recommended the City Council certify the proposed negative declaration; and, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, at a public hearing held on Tuesday, April 25, 2000, hereby certifies Negative Declaration 99027 as shown on Exhibit A based on the following Findings: (a) The Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA; and, (b) The Negative Declaration was presented to the Planning Commission, and the information contained therein was considered by the Planning Commission, prior to recommending action on the project for which it was prepared; and, (c) The project does not have the potential to create a significant environmental impact when mitigation measures are incorporated into the project through conditions of approval; and, 066 Draft Resolution April 25,2000 Page 2 of 3 (d) The Draft Negative Declaration will be forwarded to the City Council, and the information therein contained will be considered by the City Council, prior to taking final action on the project. On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: Ray Johnson, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney �� a Page 3 of 3 Exhibit A Proposed Negative Declaration ZC 99007,TPM 99010 FILE Opy CITY OF ATASCADERO 191A � � t87B PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION#99027 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero,CA 93422 805/461-5035 (ENDORSED) APPLICANT: Jimmie D.Shores = iLF. D PO Box 216 Atascadero,CA 93422 AUG 3 1 1999 434-4250 1WEE L!100E AIALO,COUNTY CORK PROJECT TITLE: Zone Change 99007, Tentative Parcel Map 99010 3y!�_r!aile A.Roberts DEPUTY CLERK PROJECT LOCATION: SW Corner of Robles Avenue and Sombrilla Avenue,Atascadero,CA 93422 APS 030-120-001 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed rezone to Planned Development Overlay Zone PD-7 and 4 lot Tentative Parcel Map to permit the construction of 4 detached,single family homes of 1550 square feet with one-bedroom. The project is located on a vacant lot within an established neighborhood ofsingle family and multifamily housing. The lot has slopes below 10%with two mature native oak trees located along the Sombrilla Avenue frontage. Full urban services area available to the site. The General Plan Designation is Low Densiry Multi- Family(LDMF)and the Zoning District is RMF--10. The project is consistent with the maximum density permitted by the General Plan. FINDINGS: 1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment when mitigation measures are incorporated into the project. 2. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. 3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable. 4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. DETERNIINATION: Based on the above findings,and the information contained in the initial study 99027(made a part hereof by reference and on file in the Community Development Department),it has been determined that the above project will not have an adverse impact on the environment.. PREPARED BY: Warren Frace,Planning Services Manager DATE POSTED: September 1,1999 PUBLIC REVIEW ENDS: September 20,1999 DATE ADOPTED: Attachment 7: Draft Ordinance Approval of Zoning Map Amendment ZC 99007,TPM 99010 DRAFT ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 99007 THEREBY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP DISTRICT OF APN 030-011-015 FROM RMF-10 (RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY) TO RMF-10/PD-7 (RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY WITH A PD-7 OVERLAY DISTRICT) SUBJECT TO A MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT. (N.W.C. Robles Avenue& Sombrilla Avenue/ Shores) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jimmie D. Shores (PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family)to RMF-10/PD-7 (Residential Multi- Family with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and a 4-lot residential tentative parcel map on APN 030-011-015; and, WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is LDMF (Low Density Multi- Family); and, WHEREAS, the site's zoning district is RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family); and, WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enact this amendment to the Zoning Map to protect the health, safety and welfare of its citizens by applying orderly development of the City; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing on Tuesday, March 21, 2000 to consider the project, at which the Commission referred the item back to staff for consideration of an affordable housing density bonus; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on April 4, 2000, studied and considered Zone Change 99007, after first studying and considering the Draft Negative Declaration prepared for the project recommended the project for approval to the City Council, and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone Change application was held by the City Council of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Zoning amendments; and, 0U9 Draft Ordinance April 25,2000 Page 2 of 4 WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on April 25, 2000, studied and considered Zone Change 99007, after first studying and considering the Draft Negative Declaration prepared for the project and the Planning Commission's recommendation, and, NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council does ordain as follows: Section 1. Findings for approval of zoning map change. 1. The zone change is consistent with General Plan policies and all other applicable ordinances and policies of the City. 2. The zone change will not, in itself, result in significant environmental impacts. The Negative Declaration prepared for the zone change and for the project has been certified as adequate, in accordance with California environmental laws. Section 2. Zone map change. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Atascadero on file in the Community Development Department is hereby amended as shown on the attached Exhibit A, which is made part of this ordinance by reference. Section 3. Publication. A summary of the ordinance, approved by the City attorney, together with ayes and noes, shall be published at least five days prior to its final passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper published and circulated in said City, and the same shall go into effect at the expiration of thirty(30) days after its said final passage. A copy of the full text of this ordinance shall be on file in the City Clerk Office on and after the date following introduction and passage to print and shall be available to any interested member of the public. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective a 12:01 a.m. on the 31St day after its final passage. C 0 Draft Ordinance April 25,2000 Page 3 of 4 On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing ordinance is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: Ray Johnson, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney 071 � � 11�y'�ii�Y�i j art. � : � " n : . : . _._ ___ ������ 1��1y���, II Attachment 8: Draft Resolution Approval of the Master Plan of Development ZC 99007,TPM 99010 DRAFT COUNCIL RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING A MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT (CUP 99022) FOR THE PD-7 OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT FOR APN 030-011-015. (N.W.C. Robles Avenue & Sombrilla Avenue/ Shores) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jimmie D. Shores (PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family)to RMF-10/PD-7 (Residential Multi- Family with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and a 4-lot residential tentative parcel map on APN 030-011-015; and, WHEREAS,the site's General Plan Designation is LDMF (Low Density Multi- Family; and, WHEREAS, the site's zoning district is RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family; and, WHEREAS,the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing on Tuesday, March 21, 2000 to consider the project, at which the Commission referred the item back to staff for consideration of an affordable housing density bonus; and, WHEREAS,the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on April 4, 2000, studied and considered the Master Plan of Development(CUP 99022), after first studying and considering the Draft Negative Declaration prepared for the project, recommended approval of the project to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended that a site be rezoned to include a PD-7 overlay district which requires the adoption of a Master Plan of Development; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Master Plan of Development application was held by the City Council at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Master Plan of Development; and, WHEREAS, the City Council, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on April 25, 2000, studied and considered the Master Plan of Development(CUP 99022), after first 0 Draft Resolution April 25,2000 Page 2 of 13 studying and considering the Draft Negative Declaration prepared for the project, and the Planning Commission's recommendation; and, NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council takes the following actions: SECTION 1. Findings for Approval of Master Plan of Development. The City Council finds as follows: a) The proposed project or use is consistent with the General Plan and the City's Appearance Review Manual; and, b) The proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provisions of the Title (Zoning Ordinance) including the PD-7 Ordinance; and, c) The establishment, and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use; and, d) That the proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the character or the immediate neighborhood or contrary to its orderly development; and, e) That the proposed use or project will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be improved in conjunction with the project, or beyond the normal traffic volume of the surrounding neighborhood that would result from full development in accordance with the Land Use Element. f) The project as conditioned will provide for one moderate income dwelling unit and is therefore entitled to a 25%density bonus. SECTION 2. Approval. The City Council of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on April 25, 2000, resolved to approve the Master Plan of Development (CUP 99022) subject to the following: a) EXHIBIT A: Conditions of Approval b) EXHIBIT B: Site Plan c) EXHIBIT C: Statistical Summary of Project d) EXHIBIT D: Landscape Plan e) EXHIBIT E: Grading and Drainage Plan f) EXHIBIT F: Grading Cross Sections g) EXHIBIT G: Elevations and Floor Plans h) EXHIBIT H: Exterior Colors and Materials 074 Draft Resolution April 25,2000 Page 3 of 13 On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: Ray Johnson, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney 07� Draft Resolution April 25,2000 Page 4 of 13 EXHIBIT A. Conditions of Approval ZC 99007-PD-7 Master Plan of Development(CUP 99022) PLANNING SERVICES 1. The approval of this Master Plan of Development shall become final and effective following the end of the referendum period for zone change 99007(Rezone to RMF-10/PD-7). 2. Approval of this Master Plan of Development shall be valid concurrently with the life of Tentative Parcel Map 99010 and then indefinitely following final map. The Master Plan of Development approval shall expire and become null and void unless a final map is recorded consistent with the Master Plan of Development. 3. The Community Development Department shall have the authority to approve minor changes to the project the(1)increase the intensity of the project by less than 10%, (2)result in a superior site design or appearance, and/or(3)address a construction design issue that is not substantive to the Master Plan of Development. The Planning Commission shall have the final authority to approve any other changes to the Master Plan of Development and any associated Tentative Maps. 4. All subsequent Tentative Parcel Maps and construction permits shall be consistent with the Master Plan of Development contained herein. 5. All exterior elevations,finish materials and colors shall be consistent with the Master Plan of Development as shown in EXHIBIT G and EXHIBIT H. 6. All site work, grading and site improvements shall be consistent with the Master Plan of Development as shown in EXHIBIT B,EXHIBIT E and EXHIBIT F. 7. All site development shall be consistent with the maximum intensities described in the statistical project summary as shown on EXHIBIT C. 8. Native oaks trees shall be preserved and protected during construction. A tree protection plan shall be approved and in place prior to the issuance of any construction permits. 9. A final landscape and irrigation plan shall be approved prior to the issuance of building permits and included as part of site improvement plan. The landscape plan shall include the location,variety and container size of all plant material. Site landscaping shall be consistent with EXHIBIT D at a minimum including the following: a) All exterior meters, air conditioning units and mechanical equipment shall be screened with landscape material. b) Building foundations and fence lines fronting public streets shall have a continuous shrub hedge planting treatment. 076 Draft Resolution April 25,2000 Page 5 of 13 10. The storage area fence areas on Units A and D shall be recessed a minimum of 1-foot behind the street frontage edge of the garage. The enclosure fence shall be no taller than 5- feet in height and painted to match the house's exterior color. 11. All fenced yard areas shall be consistent with the locations and design indicated on the landscape plan. The yard adjacent of Sombrilla Avenue shall be not be enclosed with any fencing which exceeds 3-feet in height. 12. Prior to,or concurrently with recordation of the final map,the applicant shall record a deed restriction against one of the parcels restricting the sales price or rent of that dwelling to not exceed the income limits of a"moderate income family"as defined by the County of San Luis Obispo Affordable Housing Standards for a period of 15-years. -end of conditions- 077 Page 6 of 13 EXHIBIT B:Site Plan ZC 99007-PD-7 Master Plan of Development(CUP 99022) a--O Wan ren M\ _._ ; . � _ ..'..... _.._....... .._.__. _ . _ .. : pecan ..•,11 •.ew �,ewa .; � Vw a un -t I MMa M Vwcz q �7 tnwe WAM L v erre / 078 Page 7 of 13 EXHIBIT C:Statistical Summary of Project ZC 99007-PD-7 Master Plan of Development(CUP 99022) PROJECT DA TA PROJECT BREAKDOWN BY PARCEL: PROJECT TOTAL: 19, 110 S.F. PARCEL 1: 4,850 S.F BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 1.497 S.F. 30.99 PAVING / FLATWORK. f,414 S.F. 29. 1Z LANDSCAPING: 1.940 S.F. 40.09 PARCEL 2: 4,221 S.F. BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 1,437 S.F. 34.02 PAVING / FLATWORK. 1,096 S.F. 26.07 LANDSCAPING: 1.688 S.F. 40.09' PARCEL 3.• 4. 118 S.F. BUILDING FOOTPRINT.- 1,437 S.F. 34.92 PAVING ./ FLATWORK.- 1.034 S.F. 25. 1% LANDSCAPING. 1,647 S.F. 40.OX PARCEL 4: 5,919 S.F. BUILDING FOOTPRINT.- 1,437 S.F. 24.39' PAVING / FLA TWORK.- 2,114 S.F. 35.7x LANDSCAPING: 2,368 S.F. 40.09' BUILDING BREAKDOWN. BUILDING FOOTPRINT.- 1,437 S.F. (UNITS B, C. & D) 1,497 S.F. UNIT A) LIVING SPACE.• 996 S.F (UNITS 8, C, & D) 1,058 S.F. (UNIT A) GARAGE. 441 S.F. PARKING SPACES: COVERED SPACES: 2 AT EACH UNIT - TOTAL: 8 *UNCOVERED SPACES: 2 AT EACH UNIT - TOTAL: 8 GUEST SPACES. TO TA 2 TOTAL SPACES: 18 0 079 Page 8 of 13 EXHIBIT D: Landscape Plan 2C 99007-PD-7 Master Plan of Development(CUP 99022) ;, r u s .1 ... WT'A' J, A 1. JJ i wr l rn r r oMca fl LAlO6CAGEPL.AN rwrrwww� . ��rY11 M.r A.w�K.K w..► ��ww�.r�awri�+wr�a *17m S ML room 110 aff"siomm}C t r4'vu./t 6 on l i a ammm an®111 'a r . J - - - - - - - - ►.h�, MEN poMv �i Mea r Page 10 of 13 EXHIBIT F:Grading Cross Sections ZC 99007-PD-7 Master Plan of Development(CUP 99022) i > 1 = � P Vii- 4, t fill all SRI GINAL N 1 l i 1 1 t j ORA131M AND DRAWaS PLAN —' enc ooeL .t . : ePasru+r r uu CPAL ENOr�no i !'vtm fll l.L.9 at!..S..t K/.MN OOD9FOr A, �o t y Ml1..Awr.t•wbr/war �,q 1 N ; F � d CRY OP ATA51GID6R0 G �0°r'~ I= � ' 63 !. T I Page 11 of 13 EXHIBIT G:ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLANS ZC 99007-PD-7 Master Plan of Development(CUP 99022) y En n i w � I a ` ' } + [ZC1 • � � f m13 Vi : 1111 ,�i.•. .6 i 1� ;i�• 1 � � ' � t 1 1 i o i f C rr-==� 1 r----- ---- 11 ----- It tT l ! ; I ORIGI AL 1 i j 1 I ar rests _ V _ _ � I�, ,-.� -.=.I�rzc•,—'moi �gph r � - '',.��p� ti{fit 1� ,1�{ 1 t•a'� { � , 'JIM ►., , 3 W... � lety�t'ti f '� L; • 4.s:lM� 1�{�I = j ii qq 1MN E ria.g� tlt� t o1i s _:�C�t @i {i t i � ,}•Ju ,.n,Z�l�s 1 ..nms...��t£" ti y 1 9 a r",4 � ` 1 • �` __.-_---..COLOR .AND MATERIAL BOARD FOR ----JIM -SHORES _4 UNIT P,U.D:. PROJECT-- _ CORNER OF ROBLES :AND SOMBRILLA' AVENUES Exhibit H 0 Exterior Colors and Materials ZC 99007/Master Plan of Development Page 13 of 13 _ARCHITECTURAL_SERIES'. ASPHALT COMPOSITION SHINGLES Courtyard Tuscany 514 I 521 i I �2 x9 t $' sus FS,( Shaded Spruce , af Wood 515 4 "s Q Violet 523 Sonoma 393 Mesa Tan 381 UNITS 'A' AND 'C' UNITS 'B' AND 'D' k r � r X-55 FRENCH VANILLA(BASE 100) X-97 PACIFIC SAND(BASE 200) BODY (STUCCO AND SIDING), BODY-(STUCCO AND SIDING), _ TRIM, AND CONTRAST COLORS _TRIM, AND CONTRAST COLORS . 0 'RIVER.ROCK_CULTURED-STONE _ _VENEER _PER_ELEVATIONS i 0 Attachment 9: Draft Resolution Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 99010 ZC 99007,TPM 99010 DRAFT COUNCIL RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 99010 THEREBY ALLOWING A 4-LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF APN 030-011-015 CONSISTENT WITH THE PD- R MASTER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT (CUP 99022). (N.W.C. Robles Avenue & Sombrilla Avenue/ Shores) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jimmie D. Shores (PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family)to RMF-10 /PD-7 (Residential Multi- Family with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and a 4-lot residential tentative parcel map on APN 030-011-015; and, WHEREAS,the site's General Plan Designation is LDMF (Low Density Multi- Family; and, WHEREAS, the site's zoning district is RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing on Tuesday, March 21, 2000 to consider the project, at which the Commission referred the item back to staff for consideration of an affordable housing density bonus; and, WHEREAS,the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on April 4, 2000, studied and considered the Tentative Parcel Map, after first studying and considering the Draft Negative Declaration prepared for the project, recommended approval of the project to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Tentative Parcel Map application was held by the City Council at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said application; and, WHEREAS, the City Council, at a duly noticed Public Hearing held on April 25, 2000, studied and considered the Tentative Parcel Map, after first studying and considering the Draft Negative Declaration prepared for the project, and the Planning Commission's recommendation; and, 036 Draft Resolution April 25,2000 Page 2 of 9 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council takes the following actions: Section One. Findings of Approval for Tentative Parcel Man, the City Council of the City of Atascadero finds as follows: a) The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements. b) The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements. c) The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the Planned Development Overlay District#7 Master Plan of Development(CUP 99022). d) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. e) The site is physically suitable for the density of development proposed. f) The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. g) The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through, or the use of property within,the proposed subdivision; or substantially equivalent alternative easements are provided. h) The proposed subdivision design and type of improvements proposed will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public. g) The project as conditioned will provide for one moderate income dwelling unit and is therefore entitled to a 25%density bonus. SECTION 2. Approval. The City Council of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on April 25, 2000, resolved to approve Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 99010) subject to the following: a) Exhibit A: Tentative Parcel Map 99010 b) Exhibit B: Conditions of Approval 0 3'7 Draft Resolution April 25,2000 Page 3 of 9 On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: Ray Johnson, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney" C38 Page 4 of 9 Exhibit A.Tentative Parcel Map TPM 99010 i s 0 o Ir F �•.v r' •• ti` 9 Ir t yG'ti � ` 1 'i o� , fir f► <Vj i i" $ie i cai 11 ; p �x�u rxe ztx x tis Draft Resolution April 25,2000 Page 5 of 9 Exhibit B: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Tentative Parcel Map 99010 Planning Services 1. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall be valid for twenty-four(24)months after its effective date. At the end of the period,the approval shall expire and become null and void unless a final map has been filed or a time extension granted. 2. The form of the Final Tract Map shall substantially conform with the approved Tentative Parcel Map shown in Exhibit A. 3. The tentative parcel map shall not be deemed approved until the ordinance approving Zone Change 99007 becomes effective. 4. Prior to,or concurrently with recordation of the final may,the applicant shall record a deed restriction against one of the parcels restricting the sales price or rent of that dwelling to not exceed the income limits of a"moderate income family" as defined by the County of San Luis Obispo Affordable Housing Standards for a period of 15-mss, 5. All native trees in the proximity of street improvements will be preserved. Tree protection shall be installed prior to the issuance of permits for subdivision improvements. All tree protection shall be shown on improvement plans. 6. The applicant record CC&R's for the subdivision subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer, City Attorney and Planning Department. The CC&R's shall identify to the maintenance responsibilities of all private driveways, sewer facilities, drainage facilities, common parking areas, site lighting, landscape areas, fencing, and other common facilities. The CC&R's shall also state that each unit shall have no more than one bedroom and that all exterior colors, exterior materials, and yard fencing shall be consistent with the overall master plan of development. 7. The project shall be conditioned to comply with the following District regulations pertaining to the control of fugitive dust(PM-10). All site grading and demolition plans notes shall list the following regulations. A. All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering shall occur at least twice daily with complete coverage, preferably in the late morning and after work is finished for the day. B. All clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation activities shall cease during periods of high winds (i.e. greater than 20 mph averaged over one hour) so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. C. All material transported off-site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. 0 j 0 Draft Resolution April 25,2000 Page 6 of 9 D. The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. E. Permanent dust control measured identified in the approved project revegetation and landscape plans shall be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities. F. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading shall be sown with fast-germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation becomes established. G. All disturbed areas not subject to revegetation shall be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders,jute netting, or other methods in advance by the APCD. H. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. In addition, structural foundations shall be completed as soon as possible following building pad construction. I. On-site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 mph for any unpaved surface. J. All unpaved areas with vehicle traffic shall be watered at least twice per day, using non-potable water. K. Streets adjacent to the project site shall be swept daily to remove silt which may have accumulated from construction activities so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust from leaving the site. City Engineer 8. All public improvements shall be constructed in conformance with the City of Atascadero Engineering Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or as directed by the City Engineer. 9. The applicant shall enter into an Plan Check/Inspection agreement with the City. All fees and invoices shall be paid in full prior to recordation of Final Map. 10. A six (6) foot Public Utility Easement(PUE) shall be provided contiguous to the Robles Avenue and Sombrilla Avenue property frontages. 11. Slope easements shall be provided on each side of the right-of-way as needed to accommodate cut or fill slopes. 12. The applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities. 13. The applicant shall install all new utilities (water, gas, electric, cable TV and telephone) underground. Utilities shall be extended to the property line frontage of each lot or its Draft Resolution April 25,2000 Page 7 of 9 public utility easement. 14. The applicant shall monument all property corners for construction control and shall promptly replace them if disturbed. 15. All existing and proposed utility, pipeline, open space, or other easements are to be shown on the final map. If there are building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the final map. 16. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 17. The applicant shall provide notice either on the parcel map or by separate instrument recorded on, concurrently with, or prior to the recording of the parcel map that there are requirements for off-site and on-site improvements and that the construction of the improvements shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits or other grants of approval for development of the parcels. 18. Prior to recording the final map,the applicant shall acquire title or interest in any off-site land that may be required to allow for the construction of the improvements required by these conditions of approval. The applicant shall bear all costs associated with the necessary acquisitions. The applicant shall also gain concurrence from all adjacent property owners whose ingress or egress is affected by these improvements. 19. Prior to recording the final map, the applicant shall submit the drainage calculations necessary to demonstrate that existing downstream drainage facilities have adequate capacity to handle the total flow from the fully developed watershed without adverse affect on other properties. If downstream facilities do not have adequate capacity, the applicant shall design and construct improvements to the downstream facilities or the applicant shall detain storm water on-site in conformance with City Standards. 20. Prior to recording the final map, the applicant shall submit a map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval by the City in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 21. Prior to recording the final map,the applicant shall set monuments at all new property corners and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map,that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. 22. Prior to recording the final map,the applicant shall pay all outstanding plan check/inspection fees. 23. Prior to recording the final map,the applicant shall submit a grading and drainage plan prepared by a registered civil engineer for review and approval by the City Engineer. Drainage from areas outside the subdivision boundary shall be conveyed across the Draft Resolution April 25,2000 Page 8 of 9 subdivision in private drainage easements. Drainage shall only cross lot lines where private drainage easements have be provided. 24. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall design the following street improvements. Plans for street improvements shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. Plans shall be prepared by a regiestered civil engineer and shall be prepared in conformance with City Standards. R-value testing shall be done, and pavement section designed by a registered civil engineer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a) The northerly half of Robles Avenue shall be improved in conformance with City Standard 405 (local) along the entire property frontage, or as approved by the City Engineer. b) The westerly half of Sombrilla Avenue shall be improved in conformance with City Standard 405 (local) along the entire property frontage, or as approved by the City Engineer. c) The existing streets adjacent to the property frontage shall be overlayed to remedy an inadequate structural section or to remedy deteriorated paving surface as directed by the City Engineer. Transitions shall be constructed between the proposed improvements and the existing improvements as directed by the City Engineer. d) The minimum property line radius at the intersection of Robles Avenue with Sombrilla Avenue shall be 20-feet. 25. Prior to recording the final map,the applicant shall have the map reviewed by all applicable public and private utility companies (cable,telephone, gas, electric, Atascadero Mutual Water Company). The applicant shall obtain a letter from each utility company which indicates their review of the map. The letter shall identify any new easements which may be required by the utility company. A copy of the letter shall be submitted to the City. New easements shall be shown on the parcel map. 26. Prior to the parcel map being placed on the agenda for City Council acceptance, the map shall be signed by the City Engineer. 27. Upon recording the final map,the applicant shall provide the City with a black line clear Mylar(0.4 mil) copy and a blue line of the recorded map, 28. Prior to issuance of building permit,the applicant shall submit a grading and drainage plan prepared by a registered civil engineer for review and approval by the City Engineer. 29. Prior to the final inspection, all outstanding plan check and inspection fees shall be paid. i 30. Prior to the final inspection,the applicant shall submit a written statement from a Draft Resolution April 25,2000 Page 9 of 9 registered civil engineer that all work has been completed and is in full compliance with the approved plans and the Uniform Building Code (UBC)prior to the final inspection. 31. Prior to the final inspection,the applicant shall submit a written certification from a registered civil engineer or land surveyor that all survey monuments have been set as shown on the final map. 32. Prior to the final inspection,the applicant shall submit a Mylar copy and a blue line print of as-built improvement plans, signed by the registered engineer who prepared the plans shall be provided to the City Engineer. Atascadero Mutual Water Company 33. The applicant shall obtain a will serve letter from the Atascadero Mutual Water Company to identify conditions of service prior the design of subdivision improvements. -end of conditions- 094 Attachment 10: Draft Resolution Denial of Project DRAFT COUNCIL RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO TO DENY ZONE CHANGE 99007,AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 99010 OF APN 030-011-015. (N.W.C. Robles Avenue& Sombrilla Avenue/ Shores) WHEREAS, an application has been received from Jimmie D. Shores (PO Box 216, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a zone change from RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family)to RMF-10/PD-7 (Residential Multi- Family with Planned Development Overlay #7) with the adoption of a Master Plan of Development, and a 4-lot residential tentative parcel map on APN 030-011-015; and, WHEREAS, the site's General Plan Designation is LDMF (Low Density Multi- Family; and, WHEREAS,the site's current zoning district is RMF-10 (Residential Multi-Family; and, WHEREAS; the City Council conducted a public hearing on the proposed Zone Change and Tentative Parcel Map on April 25, 2000, and considered testimony and reports from staff, the applicants, and the public; NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council takes the following actions: SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council makes the following finding: 1. The applications are not consistent with the General Plan, specifically (COUNCIL TO FILL IN) SECTION 2. Denial. The City Council hereby denies Zone Change 99007 and Tentative Parcel Map 99010. 0a On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: Ray Johnson, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney C%96 ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 04/25/2000 y 1918 I p 1919 9 ',AT��EROi/ Atascadero City Council Staff Report- Community Services Department Consideration of a Request from the Atascadero Chamber of Commerce for the City to Participate in the Installation of Brackets and Banners on a Portion of El Camino Real RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends Council authorize the contribution of up to $3,000.00 for the installation of brackets and the purchase of 35 banners on a portion of El Camino Real. DISCUSSION: We have received correspondence from the Atascadero Chamber of Commerce requesting the City's participation in a joint effort to install brackets on 35 PG&E utility poles for promotional banners on El Camino Real (ECR). The Chamber of Commerce is coordinating the banner project, which would involve at least five organizations including the City and the Chamber. The City and the other groups would finance the purchase of the 35 brackets equally. The City and each of the other organizations would purchase their own banners. The City would have 35 banners to hang on every pole from Rosario to Curbaril Avenue. Most of the year, it's anticipated that community groups would install these banners on every other pole between the City's banners on a rotating basis. Whenever there were no events taking place, all 35 of the City's banners would be displayed. Eventually, the Chamber would like to see banners from the Factory Outlets (Del Rio Road) to the north and Santa Rosa Road to the south, with additional community groups participating as the project expands. Future participating groups would have to pay a bracket fee in addition to purchasing their own banners to expand the area. The City's sign ordinance does not specifically address banners of this type. The Administrative Use Permit process set forth in the sign ordinance would enable the City to permit and regulate such promotional banners for general public purposes. As PG&E own the poles proposed to be used, the Chamber has contacted the utility company for permission to use their poles. The Chamber is requesting that the City's Public Works Department be asked to install the brackets and change the banners on an as-needed basis. The City of Paso Robles uses the same banner system, and the banners can reportedly be changed with the use of a ladder. Atascadero's Public Works Department estimates that it will cost 007 ITEM NUMBER: C-1 DATE: 04/25/2000 $600.00 per day and two men to change the 35 banners on an on-going basis. This cost would increase incrementally as the project expands up and down El Camino Real. It is not recommended that the City provide the installation of the brackets or banners at this time due to the very limited resources in the Public Works Department. The participating groups are anticipated to be as follows: ♦ City of Atascadero ♦ Chamber of Commerce ♦ Colony Days Committee ♦ Wine Festival Committee ♦ Zoological Society of San Luis Obispo County FISCAL IMPACT: Purchase of brackets and banners (City shared) would be approximately $3,000.00. Total impact $3,000.00 for current scope of City involvement. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Have no City participation in project. 2. Participate in project by purchasing a share of brackets and City banners, assume the responsibility for installation of brackets and banners. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Letter from Chamber of Commerce Attachment 13: Photographs of brackets and banners on poles in the City of Paso Robles. 098 !► Atascadero chamber of commrce City Council & Staff City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Atascadero,CA 93422 April 5, 2000 Dear Council& Staff, It is the request of the Chamber that we be allowed on the Agenda for the April 25`h Council meeting to present a proposal for Light Post Brackets and Banners. This project idea has been tossed around for years and finally I believe we have enough interested parties to help make Banners a reality. This is a proposed joint effort between the following groups to finance the purchase of 35 brackets to be mounted on 35 light posts. Wine Festival Committee Colony Days Chamber of Commerce Zoological Society City of Atascadero The purpose of these banners is to promote Atascadero and various local nonprofit groups functions and events. We think these banners will be a good addition to warm up and make our town a more friendly community by communicating these messages to City residents. The enclosed color photo is to show you the type of bracket we would like to install on the light posts. However,we are not placing them on the antique light posts as pictured in the one from Paso Robles. We want to mount them the larger PG&E light posts low enough so the banners can be changed by someone on a ladder,but high enough to keep vandals away. Our banners would be 24"x 48", bigger than the one in the photo. A letter to PG&E has been sent seeking permission to use their light posts. We are proposing to have City personnel install the brackets like Paso Robles did for their posts. The City of Paso Robles gave this type of bracket a very favorable mark compared to the band type they have used in the past. The brackets took 30 minutes to install and 6 minutes to change out a banner. Please contact,Gary Perrazzi from the Public Works Division in Paso Robles at 237-3864 to verify this information. The key to the success of this program would be for the City to finance the purchase of at least one set of 35 banners for the general promotion of Atascadero. Individual groups would purchase 16 banners that would be interspersed among the City Banners,until 6550 EL CAMINO REAL • ATASCADERO, CALIFORNIA 93422 • (805)466-2044 0 FAX(805)466-9218 r,AP groups could fund the purchase of more banners. The founding groups would be allowed one to two months use of the brackets a year. Other groups can join later by providing funds for new brackets. We would eventually like to see light posts with banners from the Outlets to Santa Rosa Rd. The current 35 banners would cover from Rosario to Curbaril on El Camino Real. The following is the approximate overall costs to fund this project. 35 sets of Brackets $1,925 each of the five groups commitment$385 One set of 35 banners,24" x 48" 2-colors of ink on 2 different color background,with 2 different designs, $2,513 One set of 16 banners,24" x 48", with 2-colors of ink on one color background, one design, $1,230 TOTAL Cost to the City of Atascadero $2,898 TOTAL Cost to Individual Organizations$1,615 Please let me know if you require any further information to place this important item on the April 25h City Council Agenda. Sincerely, Joanne Main Executive Director 100 F...... ( i T t t d�x f y{yob. � � _ Ss3&s+•.. T u,,�I, ux v r zii,n r„s'�,nxa,r+ �? �°5 'Ti�,�_''' r• S'Fu, M�.?n?x�.r�' s � t u 102 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 04/25/2000 1918�� p 19 9 A�S�D�oj Atascadero City Council Staff Report- Community Services Department Revisions to the Stadium Park Short-Term Rules and Public Use Policies RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council adopt the draft Resolution, approving the proposed changes to the Short-term Stadium Park Rules and Public Use Policies originally adopted with Resolution No. 92-97. DISCUSSION: On Thursday, March 16, 2000, the Parks and Recreation Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council make changes to the Short-term Stadium Park Rules and Public Use Policies, originally adopted in Resolution No. 92-97. The intent of the recommended changes to Short-term Stadium Park Rules and Public Use Policies is to allow for public assembly events. In the past few months, three local community groups have recently expressed an interest in using Stadium Park in the near future for public performances. Current-City policies for the use of Stadium Park do not allow for publicly advertised special events. A copy of Resolution 92- 97, the Short-term Stadium Park Rules and Public Use Policies is attached. These policies were developed by the Parks and Recreation Commissions Stadium Park Sub-Committee and adopted by the City Council on October 28, 1997. Large public gatherings were prohibited by this policy due to the lack of restrooms, electricity, inadequate emergency access and other safety considerations. In light of the recent interest in conducting public assembly events in Stadium Park, the Parks and Recreation Commission reconvened the Stadium Park Focus Group to consider measures that may be taken to allow the facility to be used for public assembly events prior to making significant capital improvements. The reconvened Stadium Park Focus Group met on three occasions and drafted recommended revisions to item number three of the Stadium Park Short- Term Public Use Rules and Policies. In its place the Stadium Park Focus Group and the Parks and Recreation Commission are recommending the following policy be inserted, which would allow public assembly events under certain conditions: 103 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 04/25/2000 3. Public Assembly Events are permitted on approval of the City Manager, provided that the following conditions are met: The Event Holder submits the following plans prior to approval: a. Parking and transportation plans b. Fire safety plan developed in cooperation with the Fire Department C. ADA/Handicapped accessibility plans d. Security plans/APD notification plans The Following Rules will apply to all approved Public Assembly Events: a. All events restricted to daylight hours, including set-up and clean-up b. Picnic style seating on the ground with blankets and folding chairs only C. Trash disposal required by the event holder d. Vehicles allowed in Stadium Park for deliveries only e. Hazardous weather conditions may restrict use of Stadium Park for public assembly events. f. A $100.00 refundable Security Deposit must be paid twenty (20) working days in advance by the event holder g. Portable restrooms are required for all public assembly events and must be removed on the same day of the event. In addition to the above recommended revisions, the Parks and Recreation Commission and the Stadium Park Focus Group advise that certain physical improvements be made to Stadium Park prior to the approval of any public assembly event. The recommended improvements are: 1. Re-grade the existing access road based on approved grading plan, following required tree protection measures. 2. Address drainage in the bowl and on the road, based on an approved drainage plan. 3. Fill trip hazards in the "bowl area," outside of the drip-line of the trees, based an approved grading plan. 4. An area within the "bowl area" will be cleared for the placement of portable restrooms. 5. Appropriate Environmental Review to be completed prior to any work. The Parks and Recreation Commission recommends approval of the revisions that would allow public assembly events to return to Stadium Park and suggests that a "test" event with the Atascadero Community Band be conducted as soon as the recommended improvements are completed. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost for the recommended improvements are undetermined and not budgeted. The costs would have to be covered by the organizations that wish to use Stadium Park for public assembly events. 104 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 04/25/2000 ALTERNATIVES: No alternative ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution, including the proposed changes to the Stadium Park Short-Term Rules and Public Use Policies 2. Resolution 92-97, Short-term Stadium Park Rules and Public Use Policies 105 DRAFT RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADER09 CALIFORNIA = RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 92-97 AND AMENDING THE SHORT-TERM STADIUM PARK RULES AND PUBLIC USE POLICIES WHEREAS, The City owns Stadium Park, which is available for public use; and WHEREAS, The City desires to continue to implement rules regarding the use of the Park to govern said use until such time as a long-term use plan can be developed; and WHEREAS, The City desires to protect the natural asset of Stadium Park; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to rescind Resolution No. 92-97; NOW, THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Atascadero hereby resolves to Rescind Resolution No. 92-97, and approve the amended Stadium Park Short-Term Public Use Rules and Policies as shown in Exhibit A. ON MOTION BY Council Member and seconded by Council Member the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll-call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO ATTEST: RAY JOHNSON, Mayor MARCIA MCCLURE TORGERSON, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ROY A. HANLEY, City Attorney 106 L6 EXHIBIT A Draft Resolution Stadium Park Rules CITY OF ATASCADERO Stadium Park Short-Term Public Use Rules and Policies - (April 2000) 1. Stadium Park is available for unrestricted hiking. All other public gatherings must be approved by the Director of Community Services prior to the event. All public gatherings, regardless of size, are required to conform to these established rules and policies. Note: All public use may be restricted during fire season. 2. No smoking or open flames are allowed within the Stadium Park boundaries. 3. Public Assembly Events are permitted on approval of the City Manager, provide the following conditions are met: The Event Holder submits the following plans prior to approval a. Parking and transportation plans b. Fire safety plan developed in cooperation with the Fire Department C. ADA/Handicapped accessibility plans d. Security plans/APD notification plan The Following Rules will apply to all approved Public Assembly Events a. All events restricted to daylight hours, including set-up and clean-up b. Picnic style seating on the ground with blankets and folding chairs only C. Trash disposal required by the event holder. d. Vehicles are allowed in Stadium Park for deliveries only. e. Hazardous weather conditions may restrict use of Stadium Park for public assembly events. f. A $100.00 refundable Security Deposit must be paid at least 20 working days in advance of the proposed event. g. Portable restrooms are required for all public assembly events and must be removed on the same day of the event. 4. Park users are responsible for trash removal at the end of each event or visit. 5. The Community Services Department will be responsible to complete annual weed abatement in accordance with City regulations and in cooperation with the Atascadero Native Tree Association for the purpose of identifying and protecting seedlings and other flora as necessary. Pink tubes used for the purpose of protecting oak seedlings should not be disturbed. 6. Only authorized and emergency vehicles are allowed in Stadium Park. 7. PARK USERS SHOULD BE AWARE THAT STADIUM PARK IS AN UNIMPROVED FACILITY, WITHOUT ANY TYPICAL PARK AMENITIES—NO RESTROOMS NO WATER NO TABLES NO PAVED ACCESS NO TELEPHONE. However, THERE IS AN ABUNDANCE OF POISON OAK, SO PLEASE BE CAREFUL! 107 RESOLUTION NO. 92-97 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA _ AUTHORIZING THE SHORT-TERM STADIUM PARK RULES AND PUBLIC USE POLICIES WHEREAS,The City owns Stadium Park, which is available for public use; and WHEREAS, The City desires to establish interim rules regarding the use of the Park to govern said use until such time as a long-term use plan can be developed; and WHEREAS,The City desires to protect the natural asset of Stadium Park; NOW, THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Atascadero hereby resolves to approve the following: Stadium Park Subcommittee Recommendations for Stadium Park Short-Term Public Use Rules and Policies 1. Stadium Park is available for unrestricted hiking. All other public gatherings must be approved by the Director of Community Services prior to the event. All public gatherings, regardless of size, are required to conform to these established rules and policies. Note: A11 public use maybe restricted during fire season. 2. No smoking or open flames are allowed within the Stadium Park boundaries. 3. No publicly-advertised gatherings are allowed in Stadium Park. 4. Park users are responsible for trash removal at the end of each event or visit. 5. The Community Services Department will be responsible to complete annual weed abatement in accordance with City regulations and in cooperation with the Atascadero Native Tree Association for the purpose of identifying and protecting seedlings and other flora as necessary. Pink tubes used for the purpose of protecting oak seedlings should not be disturbed. 6. Only authorized and emergency vehicles are allowed in Stadium Park. 7. PARK USERS SHOULD BE AWARE THAT STADIUM PARK IS AN UNIMPROVED FACILITY, WITHOUT ANY TYPICAL PARK AMENITIES—NO RESTROOMS NO WATER NO TABLES, NO PAVED ACCESS, NO TELEPHONE. However, THERE IS AN ABUNDANCE OF POISON OAK, SO PLEASE BE CAREFUL! 108 Resolution,No. 92-97 Page 2 of 2 ON MOTION BY Councilmember Luna and seconded by Councilmember.Carden, the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll-call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Carden, Clay,Lemo,Luna and Mayor Johnson NOES: None ABSENT: None ADOPTED: October 28, 1997 CITY QF ATASCADERO C� ATTEST: RAY JOHYSON, ayor l bA&:�k(A'_j A, MARCIA M. TORGERSONVCity Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: R Y HANLE , City A orney 109 ITEM NUMBER: C-3 DATE: 04/25/2000 ■ ra w ® I iaYsE a Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Community Services Department Authorization to Formally Request Atascadero State Hospital Consider Leasing State Property on Halcon Road to the City of Atascadero for the Potential Development of a Public Park. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council authorize the Mayor to send correspondence to the Atascadero State Hospital, formally requesting consideration of a lease agreement for approximately six acres of State property for use as a public park. DISCUSSION: For many years, the City of Atascadero and the Atascadero Unified School District have been at or near maximum capacity on our athletic fields available in the community. Athletic fields for both youth and adult sports activities are virtually unavailable at certain times of the year. With youth and adult sports growing, the available field space is unable to accommodate current and future demands. With this in mind, staff has had some preliminary discussions regarding the potential for a lease agreement for state property on Halcon Road structured similar to our existing agreement for Paloma Creek Park. These discussions have been very positive and indicate that the State Hospital Administration would be willing to consider such a request by the City. Several youth sports organizations in the community are very supportive of an effort to create additional and much needed athletic fields in Atascadero. A conceptual -drawing has been developed with the help of Community Development Department staff, which is attached. This drawing is entirely conceptual and for discussion purposes only. It does however, give some indication of some of the possibilities for the property. FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. Council's direction would only provide the impetus to open formal discussions with the State Hospital officials. Actual terms of a proposed lease agreement would be brought back to the City Council for review. Long term park development costs would be identified at a future date. I10 ITEM NUMBER: C-3 DATE: 04/25/2000 ALTERNATIVES: is Do not enter into discussions with the State Hospital for a lease of real property. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Site map Attachment B: Conceptual park schematic drawing rte= 900 'r - �•2/2- 0 _ _ SOOTH _.ATAsCAofRD P,9R Cxnuul a o� AroccuIMc gf 'i 1 x J � e� 113 ITEM NUMBER: C-4 DATE: 04/25/2000 ■ oil IN �I Isis ® is e Atascadero City Council City Manager's Office Information Bulletin A. General Plan Update City staff will update the Council on progress. The first General Plan Newsletter should be going out to the community within the next week. Community meetings are targeted for the week of May 8t". Three teams of City staff will conduct the meetings using a standard agenda that will be presented to Council. B. Main Street The Main Street project is progressing. Four working groups dealing with the Main Street priorities, organization, marketing, economic restructuring and design are meeting. They are developing strategies for implementing the four areas once the Main Street program is in operation. The draft revitalization plan, which will include Main Street as a strategy, is targeted for completion in early June followed by Council hearings. C. Employee Update Paul Kropp Reserve Firefighter Resigned 2/15/2000 Nicole Hughes Service Worker Resigned 2/15/2000 Denise Hughes Service Worker Resigned 3/15/2000 114