Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet 03/14/2000
AGENDA 1918 = p 1979 ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 2000 7:00 P.M. City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue, 4th Floor Atascadero, California REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M. CLOSED SESSION: (Immediately following Redevelopment Agency Meeting) 1. Conference with legal counsel [Govt. Code §54956.9] Existing litigation: a. City of Atascadero v Atascadero Unified School District b. City of Atascadero v Kelly Gearhart REGULAR SESSION, 7:00 P.M.: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide ROLL CALL: Mayor Johnson Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide Council Member Clay Council Member Luna Council Member Scalise APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call PRESENTATIONS: 1. Proclamation declaring Thursday, March 16, 2000, "Absolutely Incredible Kid Day." 2. recognition. Employee COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to address the Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to five minutes. Please state your name and address for the record before making your presentation. The Council may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda.) COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENT AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative, Council Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities. Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on a future agenda. The Council may take action on items listed on the Agenda.) A. CONSENT CALENDAR: Roll Call (All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the item before action is taken.) 1. City Council Minutes—February 22, 2000 ■ City Clerk recommendation: Council approve the City Council minutes of February 22, 2000 [City Clerk] 2. City Council Strategic Planning Workshop Minutes—February 28, 2000 ■ City Clerk recommendation: Council approve the City Council minutes of February 28, 2000 [City Clerk] 3. Joint City Council/Planning Commission Workshop Minutes—February 29,2000 ■ City Clerk recommendation: Council approve the Joint City Council/Planning Commission minutes of February 29, 2000 [City Clerk] 4. Revision of Ordinance No. 337—Removal of Vegetative Growth and/or Refuse ■ Fiscallmpact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council introduce,for second reading by title only, the attached draft Ordinance, amending Section 6-13.05 (Exemptions) as presented. [Fire] 2 B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 2000 Community Development Block Grant Funds ■ Fiscal Impact: S237,695 in 2000 Community Development Block Grant Funds ■ Staff recommendation: Council fund allocation as specified in staff report. [Public Works] 2. General Plan Amendment 99001 —(L.U.E. Cycle 1, 2000) Zone Change 99001, Tentative Parcel Ma 9p 9003 ■ Fiscal Impact: Negligible ■ Planning Commission recommendation: 1. Council adopt attached draft Resolution, certifying the proposed Negative Declaration; 2. Council adopt attached draft Resolution, approving proposed General Plan Amendment 99001; 3. Council introduce for first reading by title only, the attached draft Ordinance, approving proposed Zone Change 99001; 4. Council adopt attached draft Resolution, approving Tentative Parcel Map 99003 as conditioned and subject to findings. [Community Development] C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. Mid Year Review ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council receive and file report [Administrative Services] 2. Information Bulletin D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: (The follotiti,ing represent standing committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necessary): 1. S.L.O. Council of Governments/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority 2. Finance Committee 3. Water Committees: a. SLO County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Water Resources Advisory Committee b. Nacimiento Water Purveyors' contract Technical Advisory Committee C. North County Water forum 4. Integrated Waste Management Authority 5. North County Council 6. Air Pollution Control District 7. County Mayor's Round Table 8. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors 9. City/ Schools Committee 10. Economic Opportunity Commission 11. SCA-3 Steering Committee 3 E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: 1. City Council 2. City Attorney 3. City Clerk 4. City Treasurer F. ADJOURNMENT: THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION IS SCHEDULED ON MARCH 28, 2000, AT 7:00 P.M. Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. 4 City of Atascadero WELCOME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING GENERAL INFORMATION The City Council meets in regular session on the second and fourth.Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber of City Hall. Matters are considered by the Council in the order of the printed Agenda. Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk(Room 208), and in the Information Office (Room 103), available for public inspection during City Hall business hours. An agenda packet is also available for public review at the Atascadero Library, 6850 Morro Road. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office, (805) 461-5010, or the City Clerk's Office, (805)461-5074. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service. TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will give their report, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding the matter being considered to step up to the podium. If you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way: • You must approach the podium and be recognized by the Mayor • Give your name and address(not required) • Make your statement • All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council • All comments limited to 5 minutes (unless changed by the Council) • No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so, and no one may speak more than twice on any item. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed, and thereafter, no further public comments will be heard by the Council. TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA Under Agenda item, "COMMUNITY FORUM", the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having business with the Council to: • Please approach the podium and be recognized • Give your name and address • State the nature of your business This is the time items not on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum (unless changed by the Council). TO HAVE ITEMS PLACED ON AGENDA All business matters to appear on the Agenda must be in the Office of the City Manager ten days preceding the Council meeting. Should you have a matter you wish to bring before the Council, please mail or bring a written communication to the City-Manager's office in City Hall prior to the deadline. "Absolutely Incredible Kid Day" March 16,2000 WHEREAS, Camp Fire Boys and Girls, the national organization, will sponsor Absolutely Incredible Kid Day on March 16, 2000; and WHEREAS, Camp Fire Boys and Girls has issued a call to action, asking every adult in America to Write a letter to a child or children on March 16, 2000, and WHEREAS, Camp Fire Boys and Girls has established the goal that every child receive a letter on March 16, 2000, and WHEREAS, Camp Fire Council of the Central Coast Inc. in the City of Atascadero, California teaches boys and girls self-reliance, good citizenship and leadership; and WHEREAS, through contemporary programs and by speaking out on issues affecting youth and their families, Camp Fire Boys and Girls helps youth cope with their changing world, and WHEREAS in Camp Fire the choices and opportunities are inclusive to boys andgirls; and WHEREAS, Camp Fire Boys and Girls is commended for the valuable programs offered to young people in the City of Atascadero, California and throughout the nation, and for the many services these young people perform for their communities through Camp Fire; NOW, THEREFORE, I, the Mayor of the City of Atascadero, California, do hereby officially proclaim March 16, 2000, to be Absolutely Incredible Kid Day in the City of Atascadero, California and decla chil n Atascadero as absolutely incredible kids this 14th day of Marc :n the ye wo tho and. Ray Jo so , Mayo Atas dero City C ncil Date: March 14, 000 e0l ITEM NUMBER: A-1 DATE: 03/14/2000 r - :,. MINUTES Isis'0 ® e ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2000 7:00 P.M. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: 6:30 P.M. CLOSED SESSION: (Immediately following Redevelopment Agency Meeting) 1. Conference with legal counsel [Govt. Code §54956.9] Existing litigation: City of Atascadero v Atascadero Unified School District City Attorney Roy Hanley announced there was no reportable action taken. • REGULAR SESSION, 7:00 P.M.: Mayor Johnson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members of Girl Scout Troops #65, #423, and#618 presented flags and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Council Members Arrambide, Clay, Luna, Scalise and Mayor Johnson Absent: None Others Present: City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson and City Treasurer David Graham Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Police Chief Dennis Hegwood, Fire Chief Mike McCain, Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry, Public Works Director Steve Kahn, Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard, Community and Economic Development Director Paul Saldana, Principal is Planner Warren Frace, and City Attorney Roy Hanley e02 APPROVAL OF AGENDA: • MOTION: By Council Member Scalise and seconded by Council Member Clay to approve the agenda. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. PRESENTATIONS: 1. Proclamation declaring February 22, 2000 "Girl Scouting's Thinking Day." Mayor Johnson presented the proclamation to the Troop Leaders. COMMUNITY FORUM: Hank Alberts, President of the American Civil Liberties Union, SLO County, sent information to the Council opposing Proposition 21 and urged the Council to oppose the proposition also. Calvin Kunz, 3314 S. El Pomar Road, Templeton, campaign coordinator for Proposition 22, expressed support for Proposition 22 and asked the Council to endorse the Proposition. Barbie Butz, 3370 San Fernando Road, read a proposed letter to the editor written by the Parks • and Recreation Commission in support of Proposition 12. She handed out copies of the letter and asked the individual Council Members to sign them if they supported the Proposition (see Attachment A). Eric Greening, 6600 Lewis Ave., stated he is strongly opposed to Proposition 21 and 22. However, he stated that he is in favor of both Proposition 12 and 14. Mayor Johnson closed the Public Comment period. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENT AND REPORTS: Mayor Johnson read a letter sent to him congratulating Atascadero on our Tree City USA designation(see Attachment B). A. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. City Council Minutes—February 08, 2000 ■ City Clerk recommendation: Council approve the City Council minutes of February 08, 2000 [Marcia McClure Torgerson] • CC 02/22/00 [� 3 Page 2 of 6 [: 2. Fire Department Fee Schedule ■ Fiscal Impact: No negative fiscal impact. ■ Staff recommendation: Council adopt attached Draft Resolution, rescinding and amending Resolution No. 1999-006. [Fire Department] 3. Revision of Ordinance No. 337—Removal of Vegetative Growth and/or Refuse ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council introduce,for first reading by title only, the attached draft Ordinance, amending Section 6-13.05 (Exemptions) as presented. [Fire Department] Eric Greening pulled Item#A-1, and Council Member Clay pulled Item#A-3. MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide and seconded by Council Member Clay to approve Item #A-2. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson announced that the Resolution No. is 2000-002. RE: Item 4A-1: Eric Greening stated the acronym RACK should be WRAC under the Committee Reports section of the minutes. MOTION: By Council Member Scalise and seconded by Council Member Clay to approve Item #A-1 as amended. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. RE: Item #A-3: Council Member Clay asked Fire Chief Mike McCain to give a brief explanation of the proposed Ordinance. MOTION: By Council Member Clay and seconded by Council Member Scalise to approve Item#A-3. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. Presentation of Community Telephone Survey Results - by Godbe Research ■ Fiscallmpact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council receive and file results. Bryan Godbe, President of Godbe Research, gave the presentation of the results of the random telephone survey and answered questions of Council. CC 02/22/00 Page 3 of 6 C, 4 PUBLIC COMMENT Joanne Main, 8940 San Gabriel Road, Executive Director for the Chamber of Commerce, commended the Council for conducting this survey. Eric Greening, 6600 Lewis Ave., thanked Godbe Research for their work on this survey. He also shared with the Council the results of the County survey recently completed. Richard Moen, 4200 Portola Road, thanked the Council for the repairs of Portola Road. He expressed pleasant surprise in finding that 5% of citizens gained their information about the City from the City newsletter. Barbie Butz, 3370 San Fernando, Atascadero Recreation Committee, thanked the Council for having the survey because it identifies a youth center as a priority for many community members. The Council received and filed the report and survey. 2. Reaffirmation of Current General Plan Goals ■ Fiscal Impact: None ■ Staff recommendation: Council adopt attached Draft Resolution, reaffirming the goals of the existing General Plan and directing staff to proceed with updating the General Plan with these goals as a foundation. [Community Development Department] Community and Economic Development Director Paul Saldana gave the staff report and answered questions of Council. Each of the Council Members expressed their concerns and preferences. Mayor Johnson expressed concerns for goals involving the Downtown Plan and the statement made in regard to entry level management jobs. Council Member Clay stated that he felt uncomfortable about the topics regarding land use, clustering and open space, recreation facilities/parks/playing fields and mixed uses. Council Member Scalise asked if the comments made tonight are merely comments or if they may be implemented. Mr. McKinney replied that tonight the Council is affirming that the goals listed are truly the goals they would like to have. He explained that the process will include a study which will eventually work on policies, objectives, individual definitions, etc. However, these changes will not be made tonight. He stated that the Council can give direction, although this is only the first step in the process which recognizes the goals for the General Plan and sets a good foundation for the General Plan. Council Member Clay continued, stating concerns with the Noise Element, and downtown development. Council Member Scalise named lot sizes, the Circulation Element (truck traffic), Housing Element (affordable housing), Downtown (main street), youth programs, and growth industry as areas she would like to see addressed. CC 02/22/00 Page 4 of 6 rt ^ L�fl Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide stated that possibly the Council could be confusing objectives with goals. However, he did express concern for use of the wording of"adequate regional facilities." • He commented that he would like to see the Noise Element broadened to possibly a sensory element. Mr. McKinney explained that usage of the word "adequate" is somewhat necessary for such a complex document in order to match with other programs. He stated that the Noise Element is required, however ordinances can be used in place of new elements. Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide questioned the use of language which claimed to "protect" the commercial service sector. McKinney responded that he was unsure as to the wording also, and commented that it may be a compromise as opposed to a community goal. Council Member Luna clarified some of the concerns mentioned earlier and agreed that to "protect" the commercial service sector is probably too strong of a word. Mayor Johnson stated that many of the recommendations made were valid and expressed belief that the Council is setting a nice foundation. Council Member Scalise stated that she would like to see a more useable document, one that is more specific. PUBLIC COMMENT Eric Greening, 6600 Lewis Ave., stated that the agenda listed this item as a reaffirmation of the current General Plan goals. However, each Council Member expressed a list of changes they wanted to recommend. He explained that he felt the public should have been noticed if the Council intends to amend the goals. Mr. McKinney stated if the Council did wish to make amendments to the goals, there would need to be a public hearing. Mary Pellett, 4320 Del Rio Road, stated that if any property in his neighborhood is to be rezoned, he feels the neighbors should be notified. He explained his concerns about some of the suggestions made tonight. Mayor Johnson closed the Public Comment period Mr. McKinney clarified for Council Member Clay that the issues discussed tonight could be implemented or addressed later as objectives and policies. MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide to adopt attached Draft Resolution, reaffirming the goals of the existing General Plan and directing staff to proceed with updating the General Plan with these goals as a foundation. 0 Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson announced that the Resolution No. is 2000-003. CC 02/22/00 cc Page 5 of 6 �,' V 3. Information Bulletin D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: Economic Opportunity Commission Council Member Scalise announced that April 3`d through 8th is Homeless Awareness Week and there will be numerous activities planned. She expressed pleasure that a portion of CDBG funds may go towards affordable housing. E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: Cites City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson reported that last week she attended her 1St year of a 3- year program for Continuing Education for Public Officials. She thanked the Council for the opportunity. City Treasurer City Treasurer David Graham stated that the report he gave them is an informal report. He commented that he hopes to improve his Excel skills in the near future. F. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Johnson adjourned the meeting at 8:51 p.m. to the Strategic Planning session on February 28, 2000 at 3:00 p.m. MEETING RECORDED AND MINUTES PREPARED BY: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Melanie Whaley, Deputy City Clerk ATTACHMENTS: A- Letter presented to the Editor by the Atascadero Parks and Recreation Committee expressing favor for Prop 12. B- Letter from The National Arbor Day Foundation, naming Atascadero as 1999 Tree City USA. 0 CC 02/22/00 Page 6 of 6 C 0 Attachment A Atascadero City Council Meeting Date: 2-22-00 February 22, 2000 Editor Local Media Dear Editor: The statewide ballot on March 7, 2000 includes Proposition 12, sponsored by the state legislature which, if approved, would authorize the sale of$2.1 billion in bonds to fund state, regional and local park projects. We urge everyone to vote YES on this measure. Besides benefiting the state-park system, this ballot measure would provide a direct allocation to the City of Atascadero of approximately $227,700.00 for park improvements. These funds could be used for parkland acquisition, development rehabilitation or restoration. In addition, if passed, Atascadero would be-eligible to apply for grant funds from this measure that could also pay for improvements to our parks. In addition to helping communities on a local level throughout the state, Prop. 12 will fund facility upgrades and repairs to our beautiful state park system, while protecting critical wildlife habitat and open space. These upgrades are badly needed. The last statewide park bond approved by the voters was over a decade ago. This is the best opportunity for us to step up and improve state, regional and local parks and open space, and in so doing contribute to the high quality of life we enjoy in Atascadero. For ourselves and for future generations, please join us in voting Yes on Proposition 12. Members of the Atascadero Parks and Recreation Commission Attachment B --- - Atascadero City Council RECEIVE D Meeting Date: 2-22-00 +� The Nationai i Fm 16 goo Arbor Day Found.atio4b 211 N.12th Street•Lincoln,NE 68508.402-474-5655•www.arborday.org r ASCIADERC) CIT"' February 8 , 2000 HONORARY TRUSTEES STEWART UDALL Chair The Honorable Ray Johnson Former Secretary of Interior EDDIEALBERT Mayor of the City of Atascadero Entertainer WILLIAM H.BANZHAF 6500 Palma Avenue Executive Vice President Atascadero, CA 93422 Society of American Foresters DOUGLAS BEREUTER U.S.Congressman Dear Mayor Johnson: DONALD BORUT Executive Director National League of Cities Congratulations to Atascadero on being named as a DICK CAVETT Entertainer 1999 Tree City USA! J.THOMAS COCHRAN Executive Director U.S.Conference of Mayors As we begin the new century, it is especially DR. ChiefCHAELDOMBECK appropriate to recognize the value of trees to our USDA-Forest Service communities . The trees we plant and care for today will J.JAMES EXON Former U.S.Senator cool and beautify our cities, increase property values, LADY BIRD JOHNSON help clean the air and water, and conserve energy for Stonewall,Texas J.MICHAEL McCLOSKEY years to come . Chairman Sierra Club MAXINE(MRS.FRANK)MORRISON The Tree City USA award indicates that you take yo Former Nebraska First Lady municipal tree-care responsibilities seriously. JAMES C.OLSON J.Sterling Morton Biographer PChefIES.REED An effective community forestry program is an USDA-Natural Resources ongoing process of growth and renewal--a program of Conservation Service ERNESTC.SHEA planting and care that continues through the years . As a Chief Executive Officer Tree City USA, you have a solid foundation for that Nall.Assn.of Conservation Districts R E.':TED'TURNER process of improvement . Chairman Turner Broadcasting System LAURENCE O.WISEMAN Tree City USA is sponsored in cooperation with the President American Forest Foundation National Association of State Foresters and the USDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES Forest Service . State foresters are responsible for the TONY DORRELL presentation of the Tree City USA .flag and other Chair materials . we will forward your awards to Eric Oldar in PRESTON Vice Chair your state forester' s office . They will be coordinating RICHARD H.BEAHRS the presentation with you. It would be especially HELEN BOOSALIS appropriate to make the Tree City USA award a part of your MRS.LEE(CAROLYN)CRAYTON JR. LETICIA ROCHE C.FORTUNY Arbor Day ceremony. DR.GARY HERGENRADER PAULJOHNSON Again, congratulations on receiving this national BILL KRUIOENIER DR.JAMES O'HANLON recognition for your tree-care program. STAFF JOHN ROSENOW Best regards, President SUSAN McINTOSH KRIZ Executive Vice President John Rosenow President cc : Paul M. Saldana y SOY INK' Ira ITEM NUMBER: A-4 DATE: 03/14/2000 Bill w M1 e ��scAn ; Atascadero City Council Staff Report- Fire Department Revision of Ordinance No. 337 Removal of Vegetative Growth and/or Refuse (Second Reading) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council introduce for second reading by title only, the Draft Ordinance for Removal of Vegetative Growth and/or Refuse, amending Section 6-13.05 (Exemptions) as presented, and adopt the Ordinance. The effective date will be April 14, 2000; thirty (30) days after its final passage. • DISCUSSION: I N: Staff introduced for first reading the proposed Ordinance at the regular meeting of February 22, 2000. The Ordinance is before you for a second reading and adoption. FISCAL IMPACT: No significant impact expected. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Take no action, which keeps Ordinance No. 337 in effect. ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Ordinance, Section 6-13.5 (Exemptions) Ordinance No. 337 G '7 i. PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENT • 6-13.05 Exemption to Section 6-13.04 An exemption from Section 6-13.04 of this ordinance shall apply to any land beyond 50 feet from improved streets, as declared by the City, State, or Federal Government, which has been acquired or is managed, for one or more of the following purposes: a) Animal pastures and agricultural fields growing hay or grains. The interior portion of fencedpastures where the quantity of livestock significantly reduces the vegetative growth, therefore bringing the parcel into compliance. Agricultural fields must be cut at harvest time. Uncut hay and grain is subject to abatement. b) Habitat for endangered or threatened species or any species that is a candidate for listing as an endangered or threatened species by the State of California or Federal Government. c) Land kept in a predominantly natural state as habitat for wildlife, plant, or animal communities. d) Open space lands that are environmentally sensitive parklands. e Other lands having scenic values. • Abatement requirements shall remain in effect in waterways where flood preparation measures and emergency flood control mitigation is necessary. 1) This exemption applies whether the land or water are held in fee title or any lesser interest. This exemption applies to any public agency, and private entity that has dedicated the land or water areas to one or more of those purposes or uses, or any combination of public agencies and private entities making that decision. 2) This section shall not be construed to prohibit the use of properly authorized prescribed burning to improve the biological function of land or to assist in the restoration of desired vegetation. 3) In the event that any lands adjacent to land or water areas, as described above, are improved such that they are subject to this ordinance, the obligation to comply with Section 6-13.04 shall be with the person owning, leasing, controlling, operating, or maintaining the occupied dwelling or occupied structure on the improved lands. All maintenance, activities, and other fire prevention measures required by Section 6- 13.04 shall be required only for the improved land, and water areas as described • above. C 72 ORDINANCE NO. 337 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING CHAPTER 13 TO TITLE 6 OF THE ATASCADERO MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE REMOVAL OF VEGETATIVE GROWTH AND/OR REFUSE The Council of the City of Atascadero ordains asfollows: SECTION 1 Chapter 13 of Title 6 is added to the Atascadero Municipal Code to read as follows: 6-13.01. Chapter 13. Removal of Vegetative Growth and/or Refuse Whenever the Fire Chief or his authorized representative shall find vegetative growth, as described in Section 6-13.04, and/or refuse upon any property, lands, or lots in the City, which in his opinion is or may become a fire hazard or a health and safety hazard, he shall have cause to give to the owner of said property a notice to remove such vegetative growth and/or refuse which may constitute a hazard in the manner hereinafter provided in this part. 6-13.02. Definitions The following words, when used in this part, shall be defined as follows unless otherwise indicated: "City" shall mean the City of Atascadero. b) "Council" shall mean City Council of the City. c) "Drainage" shall mean any ditch, culvert, and/or pipe used as a means of public drainage or drainage control. d) "Fire Chief' shall mean the Fire Chief or authorized representative of the Fire Chief. e) "Noxious weeds" shall mean dry flammable grass or stubble greater City of Atascadero 7 �� Ordinance No.337 j D....e 1 ..PO -than 4" in height. f) "Property" shall mean and include lands, lots, drainage structures, drainage ways, and/or drainage easements. g) "Refuse" shall mean waste matter, appliances, abandoned automobiles,junk, litter, trash, debris, dirt, cut vegetative growth, dead trees which threaten structures or streets, tin cans, paper, waste material of every kind, or other unsanitary substance, object, or condition which is, or when dry, may become a fire hazard,.or which is or may become a menace to health, safety, or welfare. h) "Street" shall mean public streets, alleys, parkways, sidewalks, and areas between sidewalks and curbs. i) "Vegetative Growth" shall mean flammable vegetation and combustible growth. 6-13.03 Vegetative Growth and/or Refuse are Public Nuisances The City Council may declare, by resolution in accordance with Sections 39561-39700 of the Government Code, that vegetative growth, as described in Section 6-13.04 of this ordinance, and/or refuse, which are, or may become, a hazard upon or in front of private property to the center line of adjoining streets in the City, are public nuisances. Also, it shall be unlawful for any property owner in the City to cause or permit any vegetative growth, as described in Section 6-13.04 of this ordinance, and/or refuse to remain on any real property in the City or on portions of streets adjoining such real property to the center line of such streets. It shall be the duty of every such person to destroy such vegetative growth and remove or destroy such refuse. The City Council may also declare vegetative growth, as seasonal and recurring nuisances. 6-13.04 Clearance of Vegetative Growth Any person owning property in the City shall: City of Atascadero C Y 4 Ordinance No.337 (a) -Maintain around structures, a firebreak made by removing and clearing away, for a distance of not less than 30 feet on each side thereof or to the property line,whichever is nearer, all flammable vegetation or combustible growth. This paragraph does not apply to single specimens of trees, ornamental shrubbery, or similar plants that are used as ground cover, if they do not form a means of rapidly transmitting fire from the native growth to any building or structure. (b) Mow dry noxious weeds which are located within 100 feet of any building or structure, or to the property line, whichever is nearer. (c) Mow dry noxious weeds 50 feet from the edge of improved roadways, 50 feet from each property line, and 10 feet on each side of driveways. (d) Remove that portion of any tree that extends within 10 feet of the . outlet of any chimney or stovepipe. (e) Maintain any tree adjacent to or overhanging any building free of dead wood. (f) Provide and maintain, at all times, a screen over the outlet of every chimney or stovepipe that is attached to any fireplace, stove, or other device that burns any solid or liquid fuel. The screen shall be constructed of nonflammable material with openings of not more that one-half inch in size. 6-13.05 Exemption to Section 6-13.04 An exemption from Section 6-13.04 of this ordinance shall apply to any land beyond 50 feet from improved streets, as declared by the City, State, or Federal Government, which has been acquired or is managed, for one or more of the following purposes: (a) Habitat for endangered or threatened species, or any species that is a candidate for listing as an endangered or threatened species by the State of California or Federal Government. City of Atascadero ,t 5 Ordinance No.337 Page 3 of 9 kept_ -(b) Land k in a predominantly p p y natural state as habitat for wildlife, plant, or animal communities. (c) Open space lands that are environmentally sensitive park-lands. (d) Other lands having scenic values. Abatement requirements shall remain in effect in waterways where flood preparation measures and emergency flood control mitigation is necessary. (1) This exemption applies whether the land or water are held in fee title or any lesser interest. This exemption applies to any public agency, and private entity that has dedicated the land or water areas to one or more of those purposes or uses, or any combination of public agencies and private entities making that decision. (2) This section shall not be construed to prohibit the use of properly authorized prescribed burning to improve the biological function of land or to assist in the restoration of desired vegetation. (3) In the event that any lands adjacent to land or water areas, as described above, are improved such that they are subject to this ordinance, the obligation to comply with Section 6-13.04 shall be with the person owning, leasing,controlling, operating, or maintaining the occupied dwelling or occupied structure on the improved lands. All maintenance, activities, and other fire prevention measures required by Section 6-13.04 shall be required only for the improved land, and water areas as described above. 6-13.06 Drainage With the permission of the permitting agencies with jurisdiction over the area in question, any drainage shall be cleaned and maintained in a manner that does not restrict the natural or engineered flow of water. 6-13.07 Superseding of Uniform Fire Code ( J.F.C.) Section 6-13 supersedes the Uniform Fire Code, Appendix II-A, Sections 16. And 17. C76 City of Atascadero L; j Ordinance No.337 Page 4 of 9 6-13.08 Notice to Destroy or Remove Vegetative Growth and/or Refuse In the event the person or persons owning, occupying, renting, managing, or controlling any real property in the City shall fail to remove therefrom and from the portions of streets adjoining such property all vegetative growth, as described in Section 6-13.04, and/or refuse in accordance with the provisions of this part, it shall be the duty of the Fire Chief or his authorized representatives to notify such person(s) to remove the same. The City Council may direct the City Clerk, in accordance with Section 39567.1 of the Government Code, to mail written notice of the proposed abatement to all persons owning property described in the resolution. The City Clerk shall cause such written notice to be mailed to each person to whom such described property is assessed in the last equalized assessment roll available on the date the resolution was adopted by the City Council. The address of the owner(s) shown on the assessment roll shall be conclusively deemed to be the proper address for the purpose of mailing such notice. Such notice shall be mailed at least fourteen (14) days prior to the time fixed for hearing objections by the City Council. 6-13.09 Form of Notice The Notice shall be substantially in the following form: NOTICE TO DESTROY VEGETATIVE GROWTH AND/OR REMOVE REFUSE Notice is hereby given on the day of , 19—) City Council passed a resolution declaring that (insert the appropriate hazard: noxious weeds, vegetative growth, refuse, etc.) constitute a (insert the appropriate term: fire hazard, or health and safety hazard) which must be abated by the (insert the appropriate phrase: cutting of said noxious weeds, or removal of said health and safety hazard). If the owner does not abate the hazard it will be abated by the City and the cost of the removal assessed upon the County property tax bill, and will constitute a lien upon such land until paid. Reference is hereby made to the resolution for further particulars City of Atascadero G 7 7 Ordinance No.337 P.—4of a and Ordinance No. 337. A copy of said resolution is on file in the office of the City Clerk, All property owners having any objections to the proposed removal of the hazard are hereby notified to attend a meeting of the City Council of the City of Atascadero to be held , when their objections will be heard and given due consideration. Dated this day of , 19 Fire Chief City of Atascadero 6-13.10 Hearing of Objections At the time stated in the notices, the council shall hear and consider all objections to the proposed removal of vegetative growth and/or refuse. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Council shall allow or overrule any objections. At that time, the City acquires jurisdiction to proceed and perform the work of abatement. The decision of the Council is final. 6-13.11 Order to Abate Nuisance If objections have not been made or after the Council has disposed of those made, it shall order the Fire Chief to abate the nuisance(s). 6-13.12 Destruction and Removal of Vegetative Growth and/or Refuse by Ci In the event the person or persons owning, occupying, renting, managing, or controlling real property in the City shall fail to remove or destroy vegetative growth and/or refuse, in accordance with provisions of this ordinance within ten (10) calendar days after the hearing of objections an order to abate nuisance, it shall be the duty of the Fire Chief and his deputies, assistants, employees, contacting agent, or other representatives to destroy or remove such vegetative growth and/or refuse. They are hereby City of Atascadero C 78 Ordinance No.337 Page 6of9 expressly authorized to enter upon private property for such purpose. It shall be unlawful for any person to interfere, hinder, or refuse to allow them to enter upon private property for the purpose(s) to destroy or remove vegetative growth and/or refuse, in accordance with the provisions of this part. Any person owning , occupying, renting, managing, leasing, or controlling real property in the City shall have the right to destroy or remove vegetative growth and/or refuse, or have the same destroyed or removed at his own expense, at any time prior to the arrival of the Fire Chief or his authorized representatives for such purpose(s). 6-13.13 Account and Report of Cost of Abatement The Fire Chief or his authorized representatives shall keep an account of the cost of abatement for each separate lot or parcel of land. He shall submit such itemized written report, showing such cost, to the Council for confirmation. Such report shall refer to each separate lot or parcel of land by description sufficiently reasonable to identify the same, together with the expense proposed to be assessed against it, which shall include charges sufficient to pay for the administrative costs of the program. 6-13.14 Notice of Report and Hearing The City Clerk shall make available a copy of such report and assessment list at his/her office together with the notice of the filing thereof and of the time and place when and where it will be submitted to the Council for hearing and confirmation. The copy shall be available for at least five (5) calendar days prior to the submission of the Council. 6-13.15 Hearing of Report; Modification; Confirmation of Report At the time and place fixed for receiving and considering the report, the Council shall hear the same, together with any protests or objections of the property owners liable to be assessed for the abatement. Upon the conclusion of such hearing, the Council shall then confirm the report by motion and the amount thereof shall constitute a lien on the property assessed until paid. The confirmation of the assessment by the Council shall be final and conclusive. City of Atascadero C '?9 Ordinance No.337 n___n_en 6-13.16 Report to Assessor and Tax Collector; Filing Cop o� f Report with County Auditor A certified copy of the report shall be filed with the County Auditor on or before August l Oth of each year for entry of such assessment of the County tax roll. In the event the report cannot be prepared in time for the County Auditor to enter the assessment on the next immediate tax roll, the certified copy may be filed with the County Auditor anytime before August l Oth of the succeeding year. 6-13.17 Collection of Assessment; Penalties and Procedures for Foreclosure The amount of the assessment shall be collected at the time and in the manner of ordinary municipal taxes. If delinquent, the amount is subject to the same penalties and procedure of foreclosure and sale provided for ordinary municipal taxes. SECTION 2 The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and circulated in this City, in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code; shall certify the adoption of this ordinance; and shall cause this ordinance and certification to be entered in the book of Ordinances of this City. SECTION 3 This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31St day after its passage. City of Atascadero . CSU Ordinance No.337 On motion by Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Lerno, the foregoing Ordinance is approved by the following role call vote: AYES: Council Members Clay, Lerno, Luna and Mayor Pro Tem Johnson NOES: None ABSENT: Mayor Carden DATE ADOPTED: January 27, 1998 /-v �IkOLD L. ARDS , III, Mayor/ ATTEST: 0-2MARCIA M. TORGERSON, Oity Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: L RO HANLEY, City Attorn P PARED BY: C /^ MICHAEL P. McCAIN, Fire Chief City of Atascadero C 3 1 Ordinance No.337 ITEM NUMBER: A—2 DATE: 03/14/2000 MINUTES ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL Monday, February 28, 2000, 3:00 P.M. SPECIAL MEETING Strategic Planning Workshop Mayor Johnson called the Workshop to order at 3:10 p.m. • ROLL CALL: Present: Council Members Arrambide, Clay, Luna, Scalise and Mayor Johnson Absent: None Others Present: City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Assistant City Manager Brady Cherry, Community and Economic Development Director Paul Saldafia, and City Attorney Roy Hanley. COMMUNITY FORUM: None COUNCIL WORKSHOP—STRATEGIC PLANNING City Manager Wade McKinney welcomed everyone to the workshop and explained how this workshop would progress. He also explained the Interpersonal Influence Inventory and how it helps the Council to understand each others' behavior and their interactions with each other. • CC 02/29/2000 C, 1 U Page 1 ITEM NUMBER: A—2 DATE: 03/14/2000 • The Council made alist of those issues they feel have been going well: What's been going well: Main St. Economy Redevelopment Carlton Hotel Recreation Center Proposal—Community Center Leadership Conference—improving working relationships Annexation efforts Communication between Staff and Council Community survey Public Works Director State Hospital Lack of litigation Resolution of flooding problems on Atascadero Ave. Resolution of Orange County Drainage preparedness Improvement of staff leadership Attitudes—staff and community Community policing—Police Academy • General Plan review Smart Growth training and workshop 6:00 P.M. RECESS: Public portion of meeting will resume at 7:00 p.m. 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL WORKSHOP CONTINUES The Council made a list of what is not going as well as they would like: What's not going as well as we would like? News "filtered"by Atascadero News Roads Commercial and industrial development Recreation services Swimming pool State's lack of response to finance requests Grand Jury Trust factor Used car lots Detention basin behind Albertson's Ugly developments • Public education CC 02/29/2000 Page 2 L� i ITEM NUMBER: A-2 DATE: 03/14/2000 Community and Economic Development Director Paul Saldana handed out a draft Economic Development Strategy and briefly reviewed the document. The Council asked that the following sentence be added to the document: "The economic vitality must come without reducing the quality of the community's environment." The Council also asked that benchmarks be added for clarity. It was also suggested that the strategy include a schedule for regular visits to businesses for the purpose of retaining them. City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson reviewed information with the Council concerning streamlining Council meetings. She explained that she received this information at the City Clerks' Annual Conference in December 1999. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Johnson adjourned the workshop to the Joint City Council/Planning Commission workshop scheduled for Tuesday, February 29, 2000 at 6:30 p.m. MINUTES PREPARED BY: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk CC 02/29/2000 Page 3 �� ITEM NUMBER: A—3 DATE: 03/14/2000 MINUTES CITY OF ATASCADERO 19;8 9 CITY COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION JOINT WORKSHOP SMART GROWTH WORKSHOP Tuesday, February 29, 2000, 6:30 p.m. I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER- 6:30 P.M.: Mayor Johnson Mayor Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. and led the pledge of allegiance. II. ROLL CALL: Present: Council Members Arrambide, Clay, Luna, Scalise and Mayor Johnson Commissioners Bentz, Fonzi, Jeanes, Kelley and Clark Absent: Chairman Carden and Commissioner Eddings Others Present: City Clerk Marcia McClure Torgerson Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Community and Economic Development Director Paul Saldana, Principal Planner Warren Frace, Assistant Planner Jamie Heltsley, Assistant Planner Phil Dunsmore, City Attorney Roy Hanley. VI. SMART GROWTH WORKSHOP Mayor Johnson asked if there was any public comment. PUBLIC COMMENT Eric Greening, 6600 Lewis Ave., asked the Council and Commission to speak loudly as without microphones, the public is having difficulty hearing. Mayor Johnson closed the Public Comment period. Joint CC/PC 02/29/2000 Page 1C. u ITEM NUMBER: A-3 DATE: 03/14/2000 City Manager Wade McKinney welcomed everyone to the workshop and explained how the • meeting would proceed. Commissioner Eddings came in at 6:45 p.m. Mr. McKinney led the members of the meeting in an exercise of teamwork. Staff explained the League of California Cities' Ten Principles for Smart Growth and encouraged input from the members of the meeting to create Atascadero's Ten Principles of Smart Growth. (see Attachment A) City Council and Planning Commission separated and discussed their expectations of each other as they referred to a list created at their joint meeting of March 31, 1998. Mayor Johnson adjourned the Joint Workshop at 8:40 p.m. The next scheduled City Council meeting is on Tuesday, March 14, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. and the next scheduled Planning Commission meeting is on Tuesday, March 7, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. MINUTES PREPARED BY: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk ATTACHMENT: A - Atascadero's Ten Principles of Smart Growth. • Joint CC/PC 02/29/2000 Page 2 Co 14 City of Atascadero PRINCIPLES FOR SMART-GROWTH 1 . Well-Planned New Growth: Recognize and preserve critical areas of open space, environmental habitats, and agricultural lands, while accommodating new growth in compact forms in areas designated for higher density, in a manner that encourages multi-modal transportation opportunities, integrates the new growth, and creates housing and job opportunities for people of all ages and income levels. 2. Maximize Existing Infrastructure: Accommodate additional growth by first focusing on the use and reuse of existing urbanized lands supplied with infrastructure, with an emphasis on reinvesting in the maintenance and revitalization of existing infrastructure. a3. Support Vibrant City Centers: Give preference to the redevelopment and reuse of Downtown Atascadero and appropriate nodes along existing transportation corridors through the encouragement and retention of mixed-use development, business vitality, housing opportunities for people of all income levels, and safe, reliable and efficient multi-modal transportation systems. 4. Coordinated Planning For Regional Impacts: Coordinate planning with neighboring communities and the County so that there are agreed upon regional strategies and policies for dealing with the regional impacts of growth o transportation, housing, schools, air, water, wastewater, solid waste, natural resources, agricultural lands, and open space. 5. Support High Quality Education and School Facilities: Encourage and support high quality public education, neighborhood-accessible school facilities and adequate library services as a critical determinant in making our community attractive to families, maintaining a desirable and livable community, promoting life-long 1 L� � 5 learning opportunities, enhancing economic development, and providing a work force qualified to meet the full range of job skills required in the future economy. 6. Build Strong Communities: Support and embrace the development of strong families and a socially and ethnically diverse community, by: (1) working to provide a balance of jobs and housing within the community; (2) reducing commute times; (3) promoting community involvement; (4) enhancing public safety; and (5) providing and supporting cultural and recreational opportunities. 7. Emphasize Joint-Use of Facilities: Emphasize the joint-use of existing compatible public facilities operated by City, school County, and state agencies, as well as take advantage of opportunities to form partnerships with private businesses and non-profit agencies to maximize the community benefit of existing public and private facilities. 8. Support Entrepreneurial Efforts: Support local PP P pp endeavors to create new products, services and businesses that will expand the wealth and job opportunities for all social and economic levels. 9. Encourage Full Community Participation: Foster an open and inclusive community dialogue and promote alliances and partnerships to meet community needs. 10. Establish a Secure Local Revenue Base: Create/support the establishment of a secure, balanced, and discretionary local revenue base necessary to provide the full range of needed services and quality land use decisions. 2 G 1 ITEM NUMBER: B-1 DATE: 03/14/2000 • 19ri Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Public Works Department 2000 Community Development Block Grant Allocation RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council forward to the County Board of Supervisors allocation recommendations for the 2000 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) funds as follows: City of Atascadero-Youth Scholarships 6,000 City of Atascadero—Sidewalk Improvements 25,000 City of Atascadero—ADA Improvements—City Facilities 30,000 • City of Atascadero—Infrastructure Impr. —Mod.Income Area 92,000 C.A.L.L. Program—Purchase of Refrigerator/Freezer 600 C.A.L.L. Program—Purchase of Dishwashers 2,252 North County Women's Resource Center—Drainage Impr. 4,430 Economic Opportunity Commission—Home Repair Program 30,000 Administration 47,413 Total 2000 CDBG Grant 237,695 DISCUSSION: Background: Preparation of the 2000 Consolidated Plan began in the fall of 1999. Workshops were held throughout the County to solicit public comment on housing and community development needs. The County published a request for CDBG and HOME Investment Partnership Act (HOME) proposals. The City has received 13 applications for CDBG funds (no requests for HOME funds were received) totaling $360,495. The City has $237,695 in CDBG funds available. • CDBG funds are available for community development activities, which meet at least one of the three national objectives: 1. A benefit to low and moderate income persons; ITEM NUMBER: B-1 DATE: 03/14/2000 2. Aid in the prevention or elimination of blight; • 3. Address urgent needs that pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community. In order for a program to qualify under the low and moderate income objective, at least 51% of the persons benefiting from the project or program must earn no more than 80% of the area median. Additionally, at least 70% of the CDBG funds must be spent toward this objective. The following criteria should also be used to guide selection of CDBG programs: 1. The proposal is consistent with the national objectives and eligibility criteria of the HUD CDBG program; 2. The proposal is consistent with the Urban County Consolidated Plan; 3. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan and other City codes/ordinances. 4. The proposal will achieve multiple community development objectives; 5. The proposal can be implemented in a timely manner, without significant environmental, policy, procedural, legal, or fiscal obstacles to overcome; and 6. The project is not financially feasible without CDBG funding. The following is a summary of each application received: City of Atascadero—ADA Improvements • Recommended Funding $30,000 The Community Services Department is requesting $30,000 to provide accessibility improvement for city-owned facilities. This improvement is a component of the City's Transition Plan for the removal of barriers for individuals with disabilities. Economic Opportunity Commission—Home Repair Program Recommended funding: $30,000 The EOC is requesting $30,000 to provide home repair services for low and very low income households. EOC has previously received grant awards of $25,000 in 1999, $20,460 in 1998, $18,000 in 1997, and $14,570 in 1996. Creative Alternative for Learning and Living—Purchase of Refrigerator/Freezer Recommended funding: $600 Funding is requested for the purchase of a refrigerator/freezer for use at a residential care facility located on Palomar Avenue. The additional refrigerated storage is needed for the six developmentally disabled residents of this home. Shopping is done once a week and currently storage of much of the perishables must be accomplished at other locations. Creative Alternative for Learning and Living—Purchase of Dishwashers Recommended funding: $2,252.25 Funding is requested for the purchase of three high temperature dishwashers for use in residential • care facilities. The current facilities have dishwashers that do not reach a high enough temperature to sanitize the dishes as is required. ITEM NUMBER: B-1 DATE: 03/14/2000 Atascadero Community Services Foundation—Youth Activity Scholarship Fund Recommended Funding: $6,000 The Community Services Foundation has established a scholarship fund to assist families of low- income youth to participate in recreational and social activities. Because this program is limited to low income youth, the benefit criteria will be met. City of Atascadero—Sidewalk Improvements Recommended funding: $25,000 Funding is requested for the reconstruction of sidewalks adjacent to the Carlton Hotel. The current facilities are not ADA compliant and would be done as part of the Carlton renovation project. City of Atascadero—Infrastructure Improvements—Low Income Area Recommended funding: $92,000 The El Centro/La Linia area is located in a geographic area that is predominantly low and moderate income. An area-wide project to correct and improve drainage would safeguard homeowners from flooding as well as protect property values from falling. Private developer funds in the amount of $15,000 and City in-kind project administration contribution in the amount of$1,500 will also be used to fund this project. North County Women's Resource Center—Drainage Improvements Recommended Funding: $4,430 North County Women's Resource Center provides assistance to women and children who are victims of domestic violence. This request would provide funding for drainage improvements to correct standing water problems and water damage to the structure. Creative Alternative for Living and Learning—Property Acquisition Not recommended for funding this year The C.A.L.L. program is requesting $50,000 to purchase a facility for use as a vocational training center for developmentally disabled adults. A specific property has not been located at this time. This project is not recommended for funding this year. The applicant has been encouraged to apply in the future when a more specific project can be submitted. North Counly Connection—Expand Parking Lot Not recommended for funding this year The North County Connection, a recovery resource center for drug and alcohol addition, is requesting $13,800 to expand the parking area, build a fence around the child care area, and install landscaping and a patio cover. Funding is not recommended at this time. Due to the confidential nature of the programs offered, the income documentation is not available to determine if this project meets the national criteria of benefit to low or moderate income citizens and is therefore not eligible for funding. L' � � ITEM NUMBER: B-1 DATE: 03/14/2000 San Luis Obispo County Special Olympics Not recommended for funding this year Special Olympics is requesting funds in the amount of $30,000 to fund staffing and administrative costs for a new position. The Outreach Coordinator position would establish an ongoing expense, which would be dependent upon annual grant allocations, a request not traditionally recommended for funding. Homeless Housing Project-Emergency Shelter Voucher Program Not recommended for funding this year The Homeless Housing Project is requesting $24,000 to provide emergency shelter voucher program through local governmental or non-profit organizations. This request is not recommended for city funding as the County is recommending full funding from their allocation. Homeless Housing Project - Permanent Shelter Feasibility and Operational Study Not recommended for funding this year The Homeless Housing Project is requesting $5,000 to perform a Permanent Shelter Feasibility and Operational Study. County Planning Staff has offered to work with this organization to obtain the information needed to explore the feasibility of a shelter in the North County. FISCAL IMPACT: The City has $245,791 in CDBG funds available for award. ALTERNATIVES: Council may choose to modify the grant recommendations made by Staff. However, awards must meet program requirements, providing a minimum of 70% of funding for benefit to low and moderate income persons, and no more than 15% to public service items. ATTACHMENTS: Application Spreadsheet z O H DU)N z O W O' Z' w w Q O f0 Z V aU) O w 0 cm c c N 'o LL o 0) F LL w 0 N 0 00 m Q > > > > > > > > O H O O T O � O 0 0 � O N C. � V CL _ a. � CL QUA QN aCL N Q. O QLQ N Q O Q Q O Q O Q Q J O N p C n C O 0 °- o co c c cm I coo Q a) CD M O M tD Z V C) 0 00 0 O O O O O N LO O p O W o000 �rooMocNno 0 0 Co O O O N o w t w N O O O Z LV 'n � rnco c° � � CNFC5O `O > 6> M LL d MJ w W � p' z ca = w v 'a O C w L O O — o .. .. c LL 3 a U uJ Q 0. H CL L N a O_ H >, O N O 3 -p to O W N U N p L N i0 N C W z 7 O , 0 O C O co d O C p CY LL J 0 E ` 0 .0 > N O E �) O X m O c w W d > N ate) v� °? > � - �' o Co — O N CL 8 m a) g c0 o CL 0 o v> 0 J W E Q o L S E o 0 0 (ca 1) a Q 0 U. m >' E ami rnN N c rn o J O 3 ate) v 2)= A-- � s t0 0 O Q E- N 2 . Q O p .0 .� i L p C N 3 0 O `" 0 E O c0 L 0 7 w O L Fn c Q w >- LL Q- 0- U) = =c C/) N ZN O U •' L (� O L U f0 O C U O c Q M O 8o p LL � c N ca do Q U A N N Na� Q. L N V N N •� O fn UON dQ a ¢ N .. UJ to ON fLN cc z >,C C LL wONCO � y �O O CO MOJO O 73NLJ J c O E00oQQO -11 o 0 O V w =ocov a � zzn QN+ EL ��2= ITEM NUMBER: B-2 1111111 R'M i DATE: 03/14/2000 • isia ��SCAn / Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Community Development Department General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Change and Tentative Parcel Map GPA 99001 (L.U.E. Cycle 1, 2000), ZC 99001, TPM 99003 8930 Junipero Avenue (Bunyea) REPORT-IN-BRIEF: The proposed project consists of a General Plan Amendment (GPA) and Zone Change (ZC) to change the minimum lot size in a single family residential district from 1.0 acres to 0.5 acres and a tentative parcel map creating two lots of 0.50 acres and 0.57 acres in area. The GPA and ZC are proposed within a 24.7± acre project area of existing single-family residential units. All of the lots within the project area are below the 1.0 acre minimum lot size of the current RSF-Y zoning district with the exception of the applicant's property. The GPA and ZC will primarily amend the General Plan Land Use Diagram and Zoning Map to reflect the existing development pattern and densities. Only one lot will be eligible to be • subdivided as a result of the GPA/ZC resulting in one additional residential .dwelling. The project consists of the following three elements: 1. General Plan Land Use Amendment 99001 would change the land use designation of 24.7± acres from Moderate Density Single Family (MDSF) to High Density Single Family (HDSF). 2. Zoning Map Change 99001 would change the zoning district of 24.7± acres from RSF-Y(Residential Single Family 1 acre minimum with sewer) to RSF-X(Residential Single Family ''/ acre minimum with sewer). 3. Tentative Parcel Map 99003 would subdivide an existing 1.07± acre parcel at 8930 Junipero Avenue (APN 030-071-042) into two lots of 0.57 acres and 0.50 acres respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission recommends, in consideration of the General Plan update process, and General Plan amendment moratorium and a revised amendment boundary: 1. Adoption of Draft Resolution, to certify the proposed Negative Declaration; and, 2. Adoption of Draft Resolution, to approve proposed General Plan Amendment 99001; and, 02 ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 03/14/2000 3. Introduction for first reading by title only of the Draft Ordinance to approve proposed • Zone Change 99001; and, 4. Adoption of Draft Resolution,to approve Tentative Parcel Map 99003 as conditioned and subject to findings. DISCUSSION: Background: The project applicant wishes to subdivide his property on Junipero Avenue (project site) into two separate lots. The existing lot is 1.07 acres and the minimum lot size in the RSF-Y zoning district is 1 acre with sewer (which is available). In order to process the parcel map application a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change were submitted to change the minimum lot size to 1/2 acre. Since the project site is not immediately adjacent to the RSF-X (1/2 acre minimum) Zoning District, the amendment application included 16 neighboring lots located to the west of the site. This original project application was recommended to the City Council for denial by the Planning Commission on August 17, 1999. At that time, the Commission found the proposed project was inconsistent with the intent of the General Plan and would have had a detrimental effect on the Goal of the General Plan to protect large lot sizes. Because the GPA and ZC are legislative acts requiring Council action, the project was considered by the • City Council on September 28, 1999. The Council decided to refer the project back to staff and the Commission for.reconsideration in light of the General Plan Amendment moratorium the initiation of the General.Plan update process. Analysis: The primary concern with the original project was its potential to create a precedent for General Plan amendments throughout the community to facilitate minor lot divisions. The concern was that the project would create the impression that property owners are entitled to split their lot down to 1/2 acre regardless of zoning.district. Once approved, a domino effect could be envisioned where adjacent property owners further east could request the same type of amendment. The concern was that numerous similar applications would be submitted for sites throughout the community. Since that original analysis of the project, a number of factors have changed in regards to the General Plan. On September 28, 1999 the Council imposed a General Plan Amendment moratorium that froze the application of new GPA applications until October of 2001. The Council also directed staff to proceed with a comprehensive update of the General Plan during this time frame. The concern that this project would create a precedent, has been considerably reduced by the General Plan Update process. The proposed project can now be considered a land use element clean up of the current General Plan that will be absorbed into the updated General Plan. When the new General Plan is adopted, new policies will be provided to guide staff and decision makers on similar future applications. C23 ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 03/14/2000 The original application proposed to extend a narrow peninsula of '/2 acre lots within -an overall 1-acre minimum district. Staff has revised the project area to include the '/2 acre lot district to the north to Curbaril Avenue and east to Sombrilla Avenue. This area includes an additional 35 non-conforming residential lots. The change will create a more logical-and consistent boundary for the RSF-X, .1/2 acre lot district which better reflects the underlying lot pattern without creating any new entitlements for additional lots. While the size of the amendment is fairly large incorporating 24.7± acres, the net effect is the creation of one additional residential unit entitlement. It was determined that this additional unit would not create a significant impact on the environment or services. If the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change are approved, the proposed parcel map would be consistent with the new zoning district. The proposed new lot has adequate space for a building site that would not impact the native trees on the site. The map has been conditioned by staff to assure the subdivision conforms to all City standards including hooking into city sewer. Environmental Review: Staff has prepared and posted a proposed negative declaration for the project in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The initial study found the project would not have an adverse impact on the environment. The public review period for the proposed negative declaration is from January 26 to February 14, 2000. Conclusion: • The General Plan moratorium and update process has changed the context which the project was originally analyzed. The potential of the project to create a precedent that would undermine the Goals of the General Plan has been significant reduced. • The expanded amendment area has eliminated the concern of extending a peninsula of'/2 acre lots into a 1-acre minimum district. • The land use amendment would likely be recommended as part of the General Plan update process. • The General Plan Amendment will result in the new entitlement of one additional residential unit. • The proposed subdivision would be consistent with the proposed zoning district and the site has adequate building sites for two dwellings. FISCAL IMPACT: Negligible ALTERNATIVES: 1. The City Council may modify any part of the project. 2. The City Council may recommend deny any of amendments and the subdivision map. Findings for the denial must be included in the motion. C' 4 ITEM NUMBER: B-2 DATE: 03/14/2000 3. The Council may refer the item back to staff or the Planning Commission for additional analysis. Direction on specific information should be given to staff. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Attachment 1: Vicinity Map 2, Attachment 2: Existing and Proposed General Plan Land Uses 3. Attachment 3: Existing and Proposed Zoning Districts 4. Attachment 4: Existing Lots Size Pattern 5. Attachment 5: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 6. Attachment 6: Tentative Parcel Map 7. Attachment 7: Planning Commission Minutes and Resolutions of Recommendations 8. Attachment 8: Draft Resolution Certifying the Negative Declaration 9. Attachment 9: Draft Resolution Approving General Plan Amendment 99001 10. Attachment 10: Draft Ordinance Approving Zoning Map Change 99001 1.1. Attachment 11: Draft Resolution Approving Tentative Parcel Map 99003 12. Attachment 12: Draft Resolution of Denial of all Applications i � :�s Attachment 1: Vicinity Map GPA 99001,ZC 99001, TPM 99003 574 p ?, o C!q ' a rs AV GADO � '--- -- Qo Fq STA p f R4 0o i� y -gJ,oawrw � ,� 90.0 � NCtryq! P Qti�' YESAL AV AA AV 7ASGOERI Ps r A b y sr aS9Y a l '[qr''C T AND 5 U AVS F �s� q 4 a �` .. s P PJ a ,kms ' `N (p f lI716YYIA s: Y F a $CAy 5 wr 9y BEG74lAl. j iz ENTEAN PV a FMU f IQ RD e < (7NL1f HkWTAIN r � 101 carrcv a LASE 2 �A ArBrt. RD UKF r PADDXK �� P A� NEIlM4V71 SP ZW ', s'fi. A PINE` �f .a:1�'67C1Wl, c..�' ` . .i N W W1 p ♦ 9 g_°... Site C !'2 g - �A a i On �i Attachment 4: Existing Lots Size Pattern GPA 99001,ZC 99001,TPM 99003 31 acres 0.74 acres 0.94 acrai4 trs400.1J OBI acres tnrnl,rJ c4oz95. •t 031 acres (50099.1) 1.45 acres Ir •. . (13400.fJ (67240.fJ Ob8 acres acres us+oo.1J 0B5 acres <29496.fJ 031 acres <7696.fJ 1.94 u7400,rJ cane 1.44 aces C15 031 aces t�52 acacres es 1.01 acres c0y7 e6 <62616.f) 036 (464",X.) 5600.1) .44 33 are (19019.1 .42 acres Hm..fJ ,� (18625+fJ 0.47 aces 1.92 acres .41 acres 036 acres (20W6-f) (87666.f) c14n1,rJ (1477&V (ne5e0 .199 (1"77. 22 are 36 (I5Yf8wf 14eae (96msfj 6062.E20 19600.036 acres '17 are ham (8ms0 (1%00,f.) I6p7.fJ .?f (6ma 014 ares .)bare 0.49 aces �oWas (10666.))(6P26.! (24% t u0y1,rJ 33 0.2 are 0.26 are 0.41 acres <t479t.r (660e.0 MAW (X8219,1.) N45�.3rJ Oo n' 0248=(10th (ll7wd) 0.48 acres 0.51 acres 012 are 025 t20rr1.rJ (2200.fj (90,1i 0.45 acres u91a.rJ a, .19 aces pj2 0,71 aces 025eM2 <124025 41.acres 071 asst 26 acres pries (12476.0 .29 acres 0.21 was (126ez,rJ 0.20mras 0.43 acres 0.44 acres <18691 sfJ (19K)o.0 0.43 Saes 0.49 acres X866141 (20581.fJ 0,41 acres UMO.0 (0149 sfJ acr p (m666.fJ 21u.rJ p aQ 028 (144CS f.) (11957 JJ O 0,49 Rats 978.0 4M.IJ 0.50 acres (26B1.fJ -E A s� PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION CHANGE WITH PARCEL ACREAGES GP 99001 � 2\ ' NOT TO SCALE , CITY OF ATA,SGADERCD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Attachment 5: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration GPA 99001,ZC 99001,TPM 99003 (ENCORSED) FILE HPY CITY OFATASCADERO 1»7B „UUE L MDF.iALO,(' `,P(U04 CAD PROPOSED NE&74DECLARATION 92000-0006 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero,CA 93422 805/461-5035 APPLICANT: John Bwryea 3310 Rio vista Lane Atascadero,CA 93422 PROJECT TITLE: General Plan Amendment 99001,Zone Change 99001, Tentative Parcel Map 99003 PROJECT LOCATION: GPA/Zone Change:24.7f acres located east of El Camino Real extending Sombrilla Avneue between Palomar Avenue and Curbaril Avenue Map:8930 Junipero Avenue,Atascadero,CA 93422 APN 030-071-042 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Consideration of a General Plan Amendment(GPA)and Zone Change(ZC)to change the minimum lot size to 0.5 acres and approve tentative parcel map creating two lots of 0.50 acres and 0.57 acres in area. The GPA and ZC are proposed within a 24.71 acre district of existing single family residential units. All of the lots within the district are below the 1.0 acre minimum lot size area of the current RSF-Y zoning district with the exception of the applicant's property. The GPA and ZC will primarily amend the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance to reflect the existing development pattern. On/v one lot will be eligible to be subdivided as a result of the GPA/ZC resulting in one addition residential dwelling. FINDINGS: 1. The project does not have the potential to degrade the environment when mitigation measures are incorporated into the project. 2. The project will not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. 3. The project does not have impacts which are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable. 4. The project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. DETERMINATION: Based on the above findings,and the information contained in the initial study 99023(made a part hereof by reference and on file in the Community Development Department),it has been determined that the above project will not have an adverse impact on the environment when the following proposed mitigation measures are incorporated into the project. PREPARED BY: Warren Frace.Planning Services Manager DATE POSTED: January 26,2000 PUBLIC REVIEW ENDS: February 14,2000 r; C , 11 Attachment 6: Tentative Parcel Map GPA 99001,ZC 99001,TPM 99003 14 aQ � �w t i a i W O^' d ar {,T,� Tp �ti JAN 7 — Z000 COMMUNnY DEVELOPMENT �a a ae R 3 {� fa I S u O s 6 a 1 a TENTATIVE PARcm MAP le a ..�a AT-00-001, ..� EkUNYEA PROPERTY •— !Ii iI SL C r «A� Gaurr a sa.1.-Ow Attachment 7: Planning Commission Minutes and Resolutions of Recommendations GPA 99001,ZC 99001,TPM 99003 Planning Commission Recommendation Minutes and Resolutions C 3 2 ITEM NUMBER: 1 DATE: 3/7/00 Y 191$ 1979 CITY OFATASCADERO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting February 15, 2000 CALL TO ORDER ?Arr Chairman Carden called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. and Commissioner Kelley led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Bentz, Clark, Eddings, Fonzi, Jeanes, Kelley, and Chairman Carden Absent: None Others Present: Deputy City Clerk Melanie Whaley Staff Present: Community Economic and Development Director Paul Saldana, Principal Planner Warren Frace, Assistant Planner Jamie Heltsley, and Assistant Planner Phil Dunsmore PUBLIC COMMENT: None CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Approval of minutes of the regular Planning Commission meeting of February 1, 2000. 2. Substantial Conformance Finding: Conditional Use Permit 8-89 Atascadero Christian Home Site Plan: 8455 Santa Rosa Road A request from the Atascadero Christian Home for a Commission determination that the relocation of two previously approved cottages to a new location and the C1133 City of Atascadero Planning Commission Minutes i(c Regular Meeting February 15,2000 �4,��5 z— rj OVA iTTCy] Page 6 of 8 Modify Condition 1. Maximum height of freeway sign shall be fifteen feet. Ayes: Commissioners Bentz, Clark, Eddings, Fonzi, Jeanes,Kelley, and Chairman Carden Noes:None Motion passed 7:0 by a roll-call vote. 6. General Plan Amendment 99001 (L.U.E. Cycle 1,2000), Zone Change 99001, Tentative Parcel Map 99003: An application has been received from John Bunyea, 3310 Rio Vista Lane, Atascadero, CA 93422 (applicant)to consider a General Plan Amendment (GPA) and to approve the a tentative parcel map creating two lots of 0.50 acres and 0.57 acres in area. The GPA and ZC are proposed within a 24.7± acre project area of existing single family residential unites with an existing General Plan designation of MDSF (Moderate Density Single Family Residential) and a Zoning District of RSF-Y (Residential Single Family 1 acre minimum with sewer). The proposed General Plan designation is HDSF (High Density Single Family) with a proposed zoning of RSF-X (Residential Single Family %2 acre minimum). All of the lots within the project area are below the 1.0 acre minimum lot size area of the current RSF-Y zoning district with the exception of the applicant's property. The GPA and ZC will primarily amend the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance to reflect the existing development pattern. Only one lot will be eligible to be subdivided as a result of the GPA/ZC resulting in one addition residential dwelling. Project Location: GPA/Zone Change Location: 24.7± acres located east of El Camino Real extending to Sombrilla Avenue between Palomar Avenue and Curbaril Avenue. Map Location: 8930 Junipero Avenue, Atascadero, CA 93422, APN 030-071-042 Environmental Determination: Proposed Negative Declaration: Based on the findings of the initial study a Negative declaration is proposed for the project consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act. The initial study determined that the project would have a less than significant environmental effect. Staff Recommendation: 1. Adopt Resolution No. PC 2000-009, recommending that the City Council certify the proposed Negative declaration; and, U04 City of Atascadero Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting February 15,2000 Page 7 of 8 2. Adopt Resolution No. PC 2000-010, recommending that the City Council approve proposed General Plan Amendment 99001; and, 3. Adopt Resolution No. PC 2000-011, recommending that the City Council approve proposed Zone Change 99001; and, 4. Adopt Resolution No. PC 2000-012, recommending that the City Council approve Tentative Parcel Map 99003 as conditioned and subject to findings. Principal Planner Warren Frace gave the staff report and answered questions of the Commission. Commissioner Fonzi asked about the rational of the boundary on Curbaril. Staff responded that the Curbaril boundary was selected to follow the multi- family boundaries existing on the north side of Curbaril. PUBLIC COMMENT John Bunyea,the applicant, stated that he was available for Commissioner questions. Chairman Carden closed the Public Comment period. MOTION: By Commissioner Benz and seconded by Commissioner Eddings to adopt Resolutions No. PC 2000-009,2000-010,2000-011, and 2000-012 subject to findings and conditions. Ayes: Commissioners Bentz, Clark, Eddings, Fonzi, Jeanes,Kelley, and Chairman Carden Noes:None Motion passed 7.0 by a roll-call vote. C %J 5 City of Atascadero Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting February 15,2000 Page 8 of 8 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORTS None COMMISSIONER COMMENTS AND REPORTS Vice Chairman Clark inquired on the status of the Carlton project. Mr. Saldana responded saying that the permits for the project are expected to be issued within the next 48 hours. Chairman Carden inquired on the status of the Home Depot project. Mr. Saldana stated that the project is almost ready to go. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Carden adjourned the meeting at 8:36 p.m. to the next regular session scheduled for March 7, 2000. MEETING RECORDED BY AND MINUTES PREPARED BY: Melanie Whaley, Deputy City Clerk C 36 APPROVED FEB 1 5 2000 ORIGINA RESOLUTION NO. PC 2000-009 6 CITY OF ATASCADE PLANNING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CERTIFY THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99001,ZONE CHANGE 99001 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 99003 (8930 Junipero Avenue/Bunyea) WHEREAS, an application has been received from John Bunyea (3310 Rio Vista Lane, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a General Plan Amendment (GPA 99001) and Zone Change (ZC 99001) to change the minimum lot size in a single family residential district from 1.0 acres to 0.5 acres and a tentative parcel map (TPM 99003) creating two lots of 0.50 acres and 0.57 acres in area. The GPA and ZC are proposed with a 24.7± acre district of existing single-family residential units. All of the lots with the district are below the 1.0 acre minimum lot size of the current RSF-Y zoning district with the exception of the applicant's property; and, WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration 2000-0006 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing following the review period for the Initial Study and Draft Negative Declaration to consider its adequacy; and, NOW,THEREFORE,the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed public hearing held on Tuesday, February 15, 2000, hereby resolves to recommend that the City Council certify Negative Declaration 2000-0006 based on the following _. Findings: (a) The Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA; and, (b) The Negative Declaration was presented to the Planning Commission, and the information contained therein was considered by the Planning Commission, prior to recommending action on the project for which it was prepared; and, (c) The project does not have the potential to create a significant environmental impact; and, (d) The Negative Declaration will be forwarded to the City Council, and the information therein contained will be considered by the City Council, prior to taking final action on the project. C3 7 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be delivered forthwith by the Planning Commission Secretary to the City Council of the City of Atascadero. On motion by Commissioner Bentz, and seconded by Commissioner Eddings the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Bentz, Carden, Clark, Eddings, Fonzi, Jeans, Kelley 7 NOES: None 0 ABSENT: None 0 ADOPTED: February 15, 2000 CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA Harold L. Carden III, Chairperson Attest: Paul M. Saldana Community Development Director k: v C. APPRaSOLUTION F R ORIGINAL CITY of ARESOLUTION NO. PC 2000-010 PLA0 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99001 CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF 24.7±ACRES FROM MODERATE DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO TO HIGH DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY. (8930 Junipero Avenue/Bunyea) WHEREAS, an application has been received from John Bunyea (3310 Rio Vista Lane, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a General Plan Amendment (GPA 99001) and Zone Change (ZC 99001) to change the minimum lot size in a single family residential district from 1.0 acres to 0.5 acres and a tentative parcel map (TPM 99003) creating two lots of 0.50 acres and 0.57 acres in area. The GPA and ZC are proposed with a 24.7± acre district of existing single-family residential units. All of the lots with the district are below the 1.0 acre minimum lot size of the current RSF-Y zoning district with the exception of the applicant's property; and, WHEREAS, the proposed project constitutes General Plan Land Use Element Amendment Cycle 1 of the year 2000; and, WHEREAS,the site is currently Designated as Moderate Density Single Family Residential by the General Plan and located within of the Urban Services Line; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enact this amendment of the General Plan Land Use Map to High Density Single Family Residential to reflect the predominate existing lot size pattern and ensure the orderly and efficiency development of the City and provision of services; and, WHEREAS,the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of _ :• environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject General Plan Amendment application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said General Plan amendment; and, WHEREAS,the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a Public Hearing held on February 15, 2000, studied and considered General Plan Amendment 99001, after first considering the Draft Negative Declaration prepared for the project; and, NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on February 15, 2000, resolved to recommend that the City Council: L u (a) Approve General Plan Amendment 99001 amending the General Plan Land Use Diagram as shown on Exhibit A. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be delivered forthwith by the Planning Commission Secretary to the City Council of the City of Atascadero. On motion by Commissioner Bentz, and seconded by Commissioner Eddings the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Bentz, Carden, Clark, Eddings, Fonzi, Jeans, Kelley 7 NOES: None 0 ABSENT: None 0 ADOPTED: February 15, 2000 CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA Harold L. Carden III, Chairperson Attest: Paul M. Saldana Community Development Director L its 1 : : IP R I OF - D mom AHPHOVEU FFB 15 2000 ORIGINAL CITY OF ATASCADER RESOLUTION NO. PC 2000-011 PLANNING A SOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE ZONE CHANGE 99001 THEREBY AMENDING THE OFFICAL ZONING MAP FROM MODERATED DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SIGNLE FAMILY(RSF-Y) TO HIGH DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY(RSF-X). (8930 Junipero Avenue/Bunyea) WHEREAS, an application has been received from John Bunyea (3310 Rio Vista Lane, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a General Plan Amendment (GPA 99001) and Zone Change (ZC 99001) to change the minimum lot size in a single family residential district from 1.0 acres to 0.5 acres and a tentative parcel map (TPM 99003) creating two lots of 0.50 acres and 0.57 acres in area. The GPA and ZC are proposed with a 24.7± acre district of existing single-family residential units. All of the lots with the district are below the 1.0 acre minimum lot size of the current RSF-Y zoning district with the exception of the applicant's property; and, WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is Residential Single Family 1 acre minimum with sewer (RSF-Y); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enact this amendment to the Zoning Map to Residential Single Family %i acre minimum (RSF-X) to reflect the existing development pattern and protect the health, safety and welfare of its citizens by applying orderly development of the City; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Zoning amendments; and, WHEREAS,the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a Public Hearing held on February 15, 2000, studied and considered Zone Change 99001, after first considering the Draft Negative Declaration prepared for the project, and NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the, City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on February 15, 2000, resolved to recommend that the City Council: (a) Approve Zoning Map Amendment 99001 amending the Oficial Zoning Map of the City of Atascadero as shown on Exhibit A; and, C42 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be delivered forthwith by the Planning Commission Secretary to the City Council of the City of Atascadero. On motion by Commissioner Bentz, and seconded by Commissioner Eddings the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Bentz, Carden, Clark, Eddings, Fonzi, Jeans, Kelley 7 NOES: None 0 ABSENT: None 0 ADOPTED: February 15, 2000 CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA Harold L. Carden III, Chairperson Attest: Paul M. Saldana Community Development Director r .......... ERNA- ------------------------- -------------- -------------------------- --------------------------- -------------------------- ................------ ............--- .................... Em E OVED 5 2000 �IGINAL TASCADE RESOLUTION NO. PC 2000-012 NNING A KESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 99003 THEREBY ALLOWING A 2 LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF APN 030-071-042. (8930 Junipero Avenue/Bunyea) WHEREAS, an application has been received from John Bunyea (3310 Rio Vista Lane, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a General Plan Amendment (GPA 99001) and Zone Change (ZC 99001) to change the minimum lot size in a single family residential district from 1.0 acres to 0.5 acres and a tentative parcel map (TPM 99003) creating two lots of 0.50 acres and 0.57 acres in area. The GPA and ZC are proposed with a 24.7± acre district of existing single-family residential units. All of the lots with the district are below the 1.0 acre minimum lot size of the current RSF-Y zoning district with the exception of the applicant's property; and, WHEREAS, the proposed project is in conformance with the proposed Moderate Density Single Family Residential General Plan land use designation which is recommended for the site; and, WHEREAS, the proposed project is in conformance with the proposed RSF-X zoning district which is recommended for the site; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero at which :. hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Zoning amendments; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a Public Hearing held on February 15, 2000, studied and considered Tentative Parcel Map 99003, after first studying and considering the Draft Negative Declaration prepared for the project, and NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero finds as follows: 1. The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements. 2. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the density of development proposed. 5. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. 6. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through, or the use of property within, the proposed subdivision; or substantially equivalent alternative easements are provided. 7. The proposed subdivision design and type of improvements proposed will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public. 616 NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero does hereby recommend approval of Tentative Parcel Map 99003 as shown on Exhibit A, subject to the Conditions of Approval contained mi Exhibit B. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be delivered forthwith by the Planning Commission Secretary to the City Council of the City of Atascadero. On motion by Commissioner Bentz, and seconded by Commissioner Eddings the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Bentz, Carden, Clark, Eddings, Fonzi, Jeans, Kelley 7 NOES: None 0 ABSENT: None 0 ADOPTED: February 15, 2000 CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA Harold L. Carden III, Chairperson Attest: Paul M. Saldana Community Development Director n j ► Exhibit A:Tentative Parcel Map Resolution No. PC 2000-012 TPM 99003 // 4 w / i �w o� RECENED a 4 JAN 7 - NUO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT :g888" n 1 TENTATIVE PARc6L MAP AT-00-001 g11NYEA PROPERTY CITY or ATASCAPOW CMMM of 9AY lur 08WO Cl- rs n Exhibit B:Conditions of Approval Resolution No. PC 2000-012 TPM 99003 Planning Services 1. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall be valid for twenty-four(24)months after its effective date. At the end of the period,the approval shall expire and become null and void unless a final map has been filed or a time extension granted. 2. The form of the Final Tract Map shall be consistent with the approved Tentative Parcel Map shown in Exhibit A. 3. .General Plan Amendment 99001 and Zone Change 99001 shall be approved and effective prior to the recordation of the map. City Engineer 4. All public improvements shall be constructed in conformance with the City of Atascadero Engineering Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or as directed by the City Engineer. 5. The applicant shall enter into an Plan Check/Inspection agreement with the City. All fees and invoices shall be paid in full prior to recordation of Final Map. 6. A six (6) foot Public Utility Easement(PUE) shall be provided contiguous to the Junipero Avenue property frontages. 7. The applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities. 8. The applicant shall install all new utilities (water, gas, electric, cable TV and telephone) underground. Utilities shall be extended to the property line frontage of each lot or its public utility easement. 9. The applicant shall monument all property corners for construction control and shall promptly replace them if disturbed. 10. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 11. All existing and proposed utility, pipeline, open space or other easements are to be shown on the parcel map. If there are building or other restrictions related to the easements,they shall be noted on the parcel map. The applicant shall show all access restrictions on the parcel map. 12. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall design the following street improvements. Plans for the street improvements shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. Plans shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and shall be prepared in conformance with City Standards. R-value testing shall be done, and 9 the pavement section designed by a civil engineer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A. The easterly half of Junipero Avenue shall be improved in conformance with City Standard 401 (Rural Local) along the entire property frontage, or as approved by the City Engineer. B. The existing street adjacent to the property frontage shall be overlaid to remedy an inadequate structural section or to remedy deteriorated paving surfaces as directed by the City Engineer. Transitions shall be constructed between the proposed improvements and the existing improvements as directed by the City Engineer. C. Lateral obstructions (utility poles and other fixed objects) shall be removed form the area between the edge of travel way and the property frontage in conformance with City Standard Drawing no 409 or as directed by the City Engineer. 13. The applicant shall provide notice either on the parcel map or by separate instrument recorded on, concurrently with, of prior to the recording of the parcel map that there are required off-site and on-site improvements and that the construction of the improvements shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits or other grants of approval for development of the parcels. 14. Prior to recording the final map,the applicant shall submit the drainage calculations necessary to demonstrate that existing downstream drainage facilities have adequate capacity to handle the total flow from the fully developed watershed without adverse affect on other properties. If downstream facilities do not have adequate capacity,the applicant shall design and construct improvements to the downstream facilities or the applicant shall detain storm water on-site in conformance with City Standards. 15. Prior to recording the final map,the applicant shall acquire title or interest in any off-site land that may be required to allow for the construction of the improvements required by these conditions of approval. The applicant shall bear all costs associated with the necessary acquisitions. The applicant shall also gain concurrence from all adjacent property owners whose ingress or egress is affected by these improvements. 16. Prior to recording the final map, the applicant shall submit a map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval by the City in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 17. Prior to recording the final map, the applicant shall set monuments at all new property corners and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map,that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. 18. Prior to recording the final map, the applicant shall pay all outstanding plan check/inspection fees. 19. Prior to recording the final map,the applicant shall have the map reviewed by all C0 applicable public and private utility companies (cable,telephone, gas, electric, Atascadero Mutual Water Company). The applicant shall obtain a letter from each utility company which indicates their review of the map. The letter shall identify any new easements which may be required by the utility company. A copy of the letter shall be submitted to the City. New easements shall be shown on the final map. 20. Prior to recording the final map, plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer for all improvements required by these conditions of approval. Plans shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and shall be prepared in conformance with City Standards. 21. Upon recording the final map, the applicant shall provide the City with a black line clear Mylar(0.4 mil) copy and a blue line print of the recorded map. 22. Prior to recording the final map, the applicant shall submit a grading and drainage plan prepared by a registered civil engineer for review and approval by the City Engineer. 23. Prior to the final inspection, all outstanding plan check and inspection fees shall be paid. 24. Prior to the final inspection, the applicant shall submit a written statement from a registered civil engineer that all work has been completed and is in full compliance with the approved plans and the Uniform Building Code (UBC) prior to the final inspection. 25. Prior to the final inspection,the applicant shall submit a written certification from a registered civil engineer or land surveyor that all survey monuments have been set as shown on the final map. Attachment 8: Draft Resolution Certifying the Negative Declaration GPA 99001,ZC 99001,TPM 99003 DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ATASCADERO TO CERTIFY THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99001, ZONE CHANGE 99001 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 99003 (8930 Junipero Avenue/Bunyea) WHEREAS, an application has been received from John Bunyea (3310 Rio Vista Lane, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a General Plan Amendment (GPA 99001) and Zone Change (ZC 99001) to change the minimum lot size in a single family residential district from 1.0 acres to 0.5 acres and a tentative parcel map (TPM 99003) creating two lots of 0.50 acres and 0.57 acres in area. The GPA and ZC are proposed with a 24.7± acre project area of existing single-family residential units. All of the lots within the project area are below the 1.0 acre minimum lot size of the current RSF-Y zoning district with the exception of the applicant's property; and, WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration 2000-0006 were prepared for the project and made available for public review in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing following the review period for the Initial Study and Draft Negative Declaration to consider its adequacy; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed public hearing held on Tuesday, February 15, 2000, recommended that the City Council certify Negative Declaration 2000-0006; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero held a public hearing following the review period for the Initial Study and Draft Negative Declaration to consider its adequacy; and, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, at a duly noticed public hearing held on Tuesday, March 14, 2000, hereby resolves to certify Negative Declaration 2000-0006 based on the following Findings: (a) The Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA; and, (b) The Negative Declaration was presented to the Planning Commission, and the information contained therein was considered by the Planning Commission, prior to recommending action on the project for which it was prepared; and, C53 (c) The project does not have the potential to create a significant environmental impact; and, (d) The Negative Declaration will be forwarded to the City Council, and the information therein contained will be considered by the City Council, prior to taking final action on the project. On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: Ray Johnson, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney X54 Attachment 9: Draft Resolution Approving General Plan Amendment 99001 GPA 99001,ZC 99001,TPM 99003 DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ATASCADERO TO APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99001 CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF 24.7±ACRES FROM MODERATE DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO HIGH DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY. (8930 Junipero Avenue/Bunyea) WHEREAS, an application has been received from John Bunyea (3310 Rio Vista Lane, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a General Plan Amendment (GPA 99001) and Zone Change (ZC 99001) to change the minimum lot size in a single family residential district from 1.0 acres to 0.5 acres and a tentative parcel map (TPM 99003) creating two lots of 0.50 acres and 0.57 acres in area. The GPA and ZC are proposed with a 24.7± acre project area of existing single-family residential units. All of the lots within the project area are below the 1.0 acre minimum lot size of the current RSF-Y zoning district with the exception of the applicant's property; and, WHEREAS,the proposed project constitutes General Plan Land Use Element Amendment Cycle 1 of the year 2000; and, WHEREAS,the site is currently Designated as Moderate Density Single Family Residential by the General Plan and located within of the Urban Services Line; and, WHEREAS,the Planning Commission has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enact this amendment of the General Plan Land Use Map to High Density Single Family Residential to reflect the predominate existing lot size pattern and ensure the orderly and efficiency development of the City and provision of services; and, WHEREAS,the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject General Plan Amendment application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero on February 15, 2000, at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said General Plan amendment; and, WHEREAS,the Planning Commission of the.City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on February 15, 2000, resolved to recommend that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment 99001; and, C5v WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject General Plan Amendment application was held by the City Council of the City of Atascadero on March 14, 2000, at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said General Plan Amendment; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Atascadero, studied and considered General Plan Amendment 99001, after first considering the Draft Negative Declaration prepared for the project; and, NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on March 14, 2000, resolved to approve General Plan Amendment 99001 amending the General Plan Land Use Diagram as shown on Exhibit A. On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: Ray Johnson, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney X56 m s ° oil Attachment 10: Draft Ordinance Approving Zoning Map Change 99001 GPA 99001,ZC 99001,TPM 99003 DRAFT ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AMENDING 24.7±ACRES OF THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FROM MODERATED DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SIGNLE FAMILY(RSF-Y) TO HIGH DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY (RSF-X). (8930 Junipero Avenue/Bunyea) WHEREAS, an application has been received from John Bunyea (3310 Rio Vista Lane, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a General Plan Amendment (GPA 99001) and Zone Change (ZC 99001) to change the minimum lot size in a single family residential district from 1.0 acres to 0.5 acres and a tentative parcel map (TPM 99003) creating two lots of 0.50 acres and 0.57 acres in area. The GPA and ZC are proposed with a 24.7± acre district of existing single-family residential units. All of the lots with the district are below the 1.0 acre minimum lot size of the current RSF-Y zoning district with the exception of the applicant's property; and, WHEREAS,the site is currently designated as Moderate Density Single Family Residential by the General Plan and located within of the Urban Services Line; and, WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is Residential Single Family 1 acre minimum with sewer(RSF-Y); and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone Map Change application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero on February 15,2000 at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Zoning Amendments; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Zoning Map Amendment; and, WHEREAS,the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Zone Map Change application was held by the City Council of Atascadero on March 15, 2000 at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Zoning amendments, and WHEREAS,the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to amendment the Zoning Ordinance to protect the health, safety and welfare of its citizens by applying orderly development of the City; and, C58 NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council does ordain as follows: Section 1. Findings for approval of zoning map change. 1. The zone change is consistent with General Plan policies and all other applicable ordinances and policies of the City. 2. The zone change will not, in itself, result in significant environmental impacts. The Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the zone change and for the project has been certified as adequate, in accordance with California environmental laws. Section 2. Zone map change. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Atascadero on file in the Community Development Department is hereby amended as shown on the attached Exhibit A, which is made part of this ordinance by reference. Section 3. Publication. A summary of the ordinance, approved by the City attorney, together with ayes and noes, shall be published at least five days prior to its final passage in the Atascadero News, a newspaper published and circulated in said City, and the same shall go into effect at the expiration of thirty (30) days after its said final passage. A copy of the full text of this ordinance shall be on file in the City Clerk Office on and after the date following introduction and passage to print and shall be available to any interested member of the public. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective a 12:01 a.m. on the 31St day after its final passage. On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing ordinance is hereby introduced in its entirety for first reading by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: Ray Johnson, Mayor Attest: Marcia M. Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney C60 -------------- -------------- ------------------------- ------------------------- can= 29 Attachment 11: Draft Resolution Approving Tentative Parcel Map 99003 GPA 99001,ZC 99001,TPM 99003 DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ATASCADERO TO APPROVE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 99003 THEREBY ALLOWING A 2 LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF APN 030-071-042. (8930 Junipero Avenue/Bunyea) WHEREAS, an application has been received from John Bunyea (3310 Rio Vista Lane, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a General Plan Amendment (GPA 99001) and Zone Change (ZC 99001) to change the minimum lot size in a single family residential district from 1.0 acres to 0.5 acres and a tentative parcel map (TPM 99003) creating two lots of 0.50 acres and 0.57 acres in area. The GPA and ZC are proposed with a 24.7± acre project area of existing single-family residential units. All of the lots within the project area are below the 1.0 acre minimum lot size of the current RSF-Y zoning district with the exception of the applicant's property; and, WHEREAS, the proposed project is in conformance with the proposed High Density Single Family Residential General Plan land use designation which is recommended for the site; and, WHEREAS, the proposed project is in conformance with the proposed RSF-X zoning district which is recommended for the site; and, WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the State and local guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) have been adhered to; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Tentative Parcel Map application was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero on February 15, 2000, at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said General Plan amendment; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on February 15, 2000, resolved to recommend that the City Council approve Tentative Parcel Map 99003; and, WHEREAS, a timely and properly noticed Public Hearing upon the subject Tentative Parcel Map application was held by the City Council of the City of Atascadero on March 14, 2000, at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on behalf of said Parcel Map; and, C62 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Atascadero, studied and considered Tentative Parcel Map 99003, after first studying and considering the Draft Negative Declaration prepared for the project, and NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Atascadero finds as follows: 1. The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements. 2. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and applicable zoning requirements. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the density of development proposed. 5. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. 6. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through, or the use of property within, the proposed subdivision; or substantially equivalent alternative easements are provided. 7. The proposed subdivision design and type of improvements proposed will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public. • C 6 3 NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the City Council of the City of Atascadero does hereby approve Tentative Parcel Map 99003 as shown on Exhibit A, subject to the Conditions of Approval contained in Exhibit B. On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: Ray Johnson, Mayor Attest: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney C64 Exhibit A:Tentative Parcel Map TPM 99003 ze a.. I UZIa \`gym i w 4 N Y I JAN 7 - Zoao COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �o�yA y' of llDD���� X y7 ``9j9 qaj R. 3 ti R �w•a ''7D TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP g� �� HIINYEA PROPERTYI =(SL � Ctrr er ATwxAoeieo Cauurr w 9w La+r Oeuvre CA. Z Exhibit B:Conditions of Approval TPM 99003 Planning Services I. Approval of this Tentative Parcel Map shall be valid for twenty-four(24)months after its effective date. At the end of the period,the approval shall expire and become null and void unless a final map has been filed or a time extension granted. 2. The form of the Final Tract Map shall be consistent with the approved Tentative Parcel Map shown in Exhibit A. 3. General Plan Amendment 99001 and Zone Change 99001 shall be approved and effective prior to the recordation of the map. City Engineer 4. All public improvements shall be constructed in conformance with the City of Atascadero Engineering Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or as directed by the City Engineer. 5. The applicant shall enter into an Plan Check/Inspection agreement with the City. All fees and invoices shall be paid in full prior to recordation of Final Map. 6. A six (6) foot Public Utility Easement (PUE) shall be provided contiguous to the Junipero Avenue property frontages. 7. The applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities. 8. The applicant shall install all new utilities (water, gas, electric, cable TV and telephone) underground. Utilities shall be extended to the property line frontage of each lot or its public utility easement. 9. The applicant shall monument all property corners for construction control and shall promptly replace them if disturbed. 10. A preliminary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for review in conjunction with the processing of the final map. 11. All existing and proposed utility,pipeline, open space or other easements are to be shown on the parcel map. If there are building or other restrictions related to the easements, they shall be noted on the parcel map. The applicant shall show all access restrictions on the parcel map. 12. Prior to recording the parcel map, the applicant shall design the following street improvements. Plans for the street improvements shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. Plans shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and shall be prepared in conformance with City Standards. R-value testing shall be done, and the pavement section designed by a civil engineer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6 A. The easterly half of Junipero Avenue shall be improved in conformance with City Standard 401 (Rural Local) along the entire property frontage, or as approved by the City Engineer. B. The existing street adjacent to the property frontage shall be overlaid to remedy an inadequate structural section or to remedy deteriorated paving surfaces as directed by the City Engineer. Transitions shall be constructed between the proposed improvements and the existing improvements as directed by the City Engineer. C. Lateral obstructions (utility poles and other fixed objects) shall be removed form the area between the edge of travel way and the property frontage in conformance with City Standard Drawing no 409 or as directed by the City Engineer. 13. The applicant shall provide notice either on the parcel map or by separate instrument recorded on, concurrently with, of prior to the recording of the parcel map that there are required off-site and on-site improvements and that the construction of the improvements shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits or other grants of approval for development of the parcels. 14. Prior to recording the final map, the applicant shall submit the drainage calculations necessary to demonstrate that existing downstream drainage facilities have adequate capacity to handle the total flow from the fully developed watershed without adverse affect on other properties. If downstream facilities do not have adequate capacity, the applicant shall design and construct improvements to the downstream facilities or the applicant shall detain storm water on-site in conformance with City Standards. 15. Prior to recording the final map, the applicant shall acquire title or interest in any off-site land that may be required to allow for the construction of the improvements required by these conditions of approval. The applicant shall bear all costs associated with the necessary acquisitions. The applicant shall also gain concurrence from all adjacent property owners whose ingress or egress is affected by these improvements. 16. Prior to recording the final map,the applicant shall submit a map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval by the City in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 17. Prior to recording the final map, the applicant shall set monuments at all new property corners and a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate, by certificate on the final map,that corners have been set or shall be set by a date specific and that they will be sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. 18. Prior to recording the final map, the applicant shall pay all outstanding plan check/inspection fees. 19. Prior to recording the final map,the applicant shall have the map reviewed by all applicable public and private utility companies (cable,telephone, gas, electric, orf Atascadero Mutual Water Company). The applicant shall obtain a letter from each utility company which indicates their review of the map. The letter shall identify any new easements which may be required by the utility company. A copy of the letter shall be submitted to the City. New easements shall be shown on the final map. 20. Prior to recording the final map,plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer for all improvements required by these conditions of approval. Plans shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and shall be prepared in conformance with City Standards. 21. Upon recording the final map, the applicant shall provide the City with a black line clear Mylar (0.4 mil) copy and a blue line print of the recorded map. 22. Prior to recording the final map, the applicant shall submit a grading and drainage plan prepared by a registered civil engineer for review and approval by the City Engineer. 23. Prior to the final inspection, all outstanding plan check and inspection fees shall be paid. 24. Prior to the final inspection,the applicant shall submit a written statement from a registered civil engineer that all work has been completed and is in full compliance with the approved plans and the Uniform Building Code (UBC) prior to the final inspection. 25. Prior to the final inspection, the applicant shall submit a written certification from a registered civil engineer or land surveyor that all survey monuments have been set as shown on the final map. L � � Attachment 12: Draft Resolution of Denial of all Applications GPA 99001,ZC 99001,TPM 99003 DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ATASCADERO TO DENY GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99001, ZONE CHANGE 99001,AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 98003 OF APN 030-071-042. (8930 Junipero Avenue/Bunyea) WHEREAS, an application has been received from John Bunyea (3310 Rio Vista Lane, Atascadero, CA 93422) Applicant and Property Owner to consider a project consisting of a General Plan Amendment (GPA 99001) and Zone Change (ZC 99001) to change the minimum lot size in a single family residential district from 1.0 acres to 0.5 acres and a tentative parcel map (TPM 99003) creating two lots of 0.50 acres and 0.57 acres in area. The GPA and ZC are proposed with a 24.7± acre project area of existing single-family residential units. All of the lots within the project area are below the 1.0 acre minimum lot size of the current RSF-Y zoning district with the exception of the applicant's property; and, WHEREAS,the site is currently designated as Moderate Density Single Family Residential by the General Plan and located inside of the Urban Services Line; and, WHEREAS, the site's current zoning district is Residential Single Family (RSF-Y); and, WHEREAS; the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Tentative Tract Map on March 14, 2000, and considered testimony and reports from staff, the applicants, and the public; NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council takes the following actions: SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council makes the following finding: 1. The applications are not consistent with the General Plan, specifically (CITY COUNCIL TO FILL IN) SECTION 2. Denial. The City Council of the City of Atascadero does hereby deny General Plan Amendment 99001, Zone Change 99001 and Tentative Parcel Map 99003. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the City Council of the City of Atascadero does hereby approve Tentative Parcel Map 99003 as shown on Exhibit A, subject to the Conditions of Approval contained in Exhibit B. C �� 9 On motion by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ADOPTED: By: Ray Johnson, Mayor Attest: iMarcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk Approved as to form: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney �U ITEM NUMBER: C- 1 DATE: 03/14/2000 1-97-9 Atascadero City Council Staff Report - Administrative Services Department Mid Year Budget Review RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council receive and file this report. DISCUSSION: The City's Annual Operating Budget is on target. Forty-eight percent of General Fund revenues had been received by the end of December, 4% higher than the previous year. Expenses are also at 48% of budget. Revenues are slightly ahead of projections. Revenues and expenditures are not evenly balanced throughout the fiscal year. As can be seen in the attached summary of funds some revenues are received later in the fiscal year. Negative "Net Income" figures depict funds where revenues are received late or where there was a plan to spend reserves. The Wastewater Fund had a planned upgrade this year using reserves so the annual "Net Income" will depict a loss. General Fund While the General Fund revenues appear healthy, some of the increase is due to technical changes by the State in Sales Tax distribution. In the previous year, the State converted their computer system. Many jurisdictions including Atascadero did not receive their sales tax in a timely manner. Consequently revenues which typically would have been reported in the first and second quarters of last fiscal year, were received in the fourth quarter of last fiscal year. In addition a large'sales tax generator did not make their fourth quarter sales tax payment in a timely manner, thus moving sales tax revenue from fiscal year 1998-99 to fiscal year 1999-2000. Overall General Fund revenues are projected to come in as budgeted or slightly higher. Expenditures will also be on target as budgeted. As expected, salaries and benefits have increased over last year. Operations have also increased over the same period in the prior year. This increase is due in part to the recognition and funding of operating costs that have not been recognized in the past (i.e. vehicle replacement costs). It is also due in part to the new financial computer system and the date of the mid-year report. The new system correctly uses the accrual basis of accounting. This means that expenditures are now recognized when incurred rather than when they are paid. Capital outlay is also up and debt service is down from the prior year C2 ITEM NUMBER: C- 1 DATE: 03/14/2000 Other Funds Citywide, revenues and expenses appear to mirror the general fund. Revenues are up slightly over the previous year and appear to be right on target or slightly ahead of budgeted figures. Expenditures are also up but still expected to come in as budgeted. Budget Adjustments The budget reviewed in this report is as of December 31, 1999. This differs from the originally adopted budget in that it includes the following three types of items: (1) Amendments to the budget made by Council. General Fund: Census 2000 Project $ 7,900 Salinas Dam Defense 50,000 General Plan Update 60,000 (2) Amounts encumbered at June 30, 1999. These are amounts budgeted for and ordered in the prior year, but were not received until the current fiscal year. Typically these are capital projects that were not completed in the prior year or large capital items. General Fund: Police Vehicles $ 25,500 • Parks Mower 20,000 Community Development Vehicles 28,470 Capital Projects Fund: Atascadero Mall Overlay 57,390 Amapoa Tecorida Storm Drain 125,950 Santa Cruz Rd Slope Rehab 35,880 Parks & Recreation Impact Fees Fund: Pavilion Parking Lot 20,000 Streets & Bridges Impact Fees Fund: Traffic Way Interchange PSR 79,340 (3) Offsetting revenues and expense items. These are typically grants or monies that must be used for a specific purpose and the related expense. These must be equal to each other. Capital Projects Fund: Revenue Expense Amount STIP Funds El Camino Real Rehabilitation $ 408,300 STIP Funds Curbaril Avenue Rehabilitation 197,200 STIP Funds Traffic Way Storm Drain 148,300 TEA Funds El Camino Real Bikeway, Phase III 140,000 ATTACHMENTS: 1999-2000 Mid Year Budget Review C� 3 City of Atascadero MID-YEAR REVIEW 1999-2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS SCHEDULES GENERAL FUND Revenue and Expense Summary 1 OTHER FUNDS Revenue and Expense Summary 2 REDEVELOPMENT FUND Revenue and Expense Summary 9 GRAPHS ALL FUNDS Revenues by Category Annual Comparison 10 Budget vs. Actual 11 Expenditures by Category Annual Comparison 12 Budget vs. Actual 13 GENERAL FUND Revenues by Category Annual Comparison 14 Budget vs. Actual 15 Expenditures by Category Annual Comparison 16 Budget vs. Actual 17 EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT Administration Annual Comparison 18 Budget vs. Actual 19 Police, Fire, and Community Development Annual Comparison 20 Budget vs. Actual 21 Community Services Annual Comparison 22 Budget vs. Actual 23 Public Works Annual Comparison 24 Budget vs. Actual 25 ORANGE COUNTY RECEIVABLE LISTING OF RECEIVABLE BY FUND 26 L �� GENERAL FUND REVENUE AND EXPENSE SUMMARY 1999-2000 1998-99 DEC 1999 DEC 1998 YEAR TO DATE ADJUSTED YEAR TO DATE ADJUSTED ACTUAL BUDGET PERCENTAGE ACTUAL BUDGET PERCENTAGE Revenues: Taxes: Property Taxes $ 1,490,720 $ 2,507,000 59.46% $ 1,396,538 $ 2,402,325 58.13% Sales& Use Tax 951,612 2,300,000 41.37% 802,935 2,240,000 35.85% Bed Tax 79,188 200,000 39.59% 69,170 182,000 38.01% Franchise Fees 58,287 473,200 12.32% 66,886 443,500 15.08% Business Licenses 18,846 107,000 17.61% 84,476 148,000 57.08% Other Taxes 45,579 60,000 75.97% 46,819 50,400 92.89% Permits and Fees 206,960 297,500 69.57% 222,149 422,800 52.54% Intergovernmental Motor Vehicle In Lieu 461,787 1,100,000 41.98% 405,252 990,000 40.93% Grants 63,477 168,440 37.69% 60,064 160,070 37.52% Other Intergovernmental 147,494 127,450 115.73% 82,861 192,595 43.02% Charges for Services Safety 82,403 147,200 55.98% 74,656 175,120 42.63% Planning 167,384 211,940 78.98% 87,663 153,400 57.15% Recreation 93,146 240,200 38.78% 98,065 253,100 38.75% Zoo 75,057 156,100 48.08% 94,156 208,500 45.16% Pavilion 30,528 65,000 46.97% 30,300 70,640 42.89% Fines and Forfeitures 33,550 53,350 62.89% 27,456 49,050 55.98% Revenue from Use of Money 25,000 50,000 50.00% 30,732 60,000 51.22% Other Revenues 181,579 433,330 41.90% 183,507 413,560 44.37% Total Revenues $4,212,597 $ 8,697,710 48.43% $3,863,685 $ 8,615,060 44.85% Expenditures: City Council $ 90,233 $ 243,550 37.05% $ 70,707 $ 159,970 44.20% City Clerk 2,307 7,430 31.05% 3,681 20,680 17.80% City Treasurer 1,758 3,890 45.19% 1,634 3,690 44.28% Legal and Special Legal 67,406 94,050 71.67% 41,377 94,320 43.87% City Manager 158,409 473,830 33.43% 160,080 413,080 38.75% Administrative Services 164,208 443,670 37.01% 147,668 508,190 29.06% Police 1,365,589 2,746,350 49.72% 1,310,597 2,753,687 47.59% Police-Grants&Special 124,866 235,500 53.02% 131,521 282,545 46.55% Fire 817,902 1,562,180 52.36% 773,140 1,544,385 50.06% Community Development 384,534 822,700 46.74% 334,805 765,570 43.73% Community Services 96,691 193,000 50.10% 85,566 202,340 42.29% Recreation 184,010 371,050 49.59% 195,383 351,190 55.63% Lake Pavilion 64,393 173,890 37.03% 48,551 157,388 30.85% Zoo 193,777 384,660 .50.38% 165,248 369,205 44.76% Parks 237,860 400,060 59.46% 173,727 336,070 51.69% Engineering 78,580 202,860 38.74% 53,337 150,435 35.46% Other Uses 206,778 423,650 48.81% 85,692 182,835 46.87% Reserves and Contingencies - - n/a - 134,485 0.00% Total Expenditures 4,239,301 8,782,320 48.27% 3,782,714 8,430,065 44.87% Net Income $ (26,704) $ (84,610) $ 80,971 $ 184,995 C 118 Pagel OTHER FUNDS REVENUE AND EXPENSE SUMMARY 1999-2000 1998-99 dmlh DEC 1999 DEC 1998 YEAR TO DATE ADJUSTED YEAR TO DATE ADJUSTED ACTUAL BUDGET PERCENTAGE ACTUAL BUDGET PERCENTAGE GAS TAX FUND Revenues: Gas Tax $ 197,310 $ 481,000 41.02% $ 220,031 $ 487,000 45.18% Interest - - n/a (245) 1,000 -24.50% Transfer from General Fund 79,130 158,260 50.00% 68,718 140,775 48.81% Total Revenues 276,440 639,260 43.24% 288,504 628,775 45.88% Expenditures: Employee Services 98,821 202,790 48.73% 92,052 199,990 46.03% Services and Supplies 237,817 436,470 54.49% 227,815 433,930 52.50% Capital Outlay 639 - n/a - 9,000 0.00% Total Expenditures 337,277 639,260 52.76% 319,867 642,920 49.75% Net Income $ (60,837) $ - $ (31,363) $ (14,145) TRANSIT FUND Revenues: Section 18 Grants $ - $ 44,000 0.00% $ - $ 40,000 0.00% Local Transportation Funds - 395,720 0.00% 82,560 372,260 22 6 Fares 21,029 40,000 52.57% 20,416 64,000 3 Other Revenues 205 - n/a - - a Interest 500 1,000 n/a 571 - n/a Total Revenues 21,734 480,720 4.52% 103,547 476,260 21.74% Expenditures: Employee Services 4,950 10,000 49.50% 5,293 11,360 46.59% Operations 173,641 400,140 43.40% 165,941 408,150 40.66% Capital Outlay 44,926 65,000 69.12% 6,033 63,000 9.58% Total Expenditures 223,517 475,140 47.04% 177,267 482,510 36.74% Net Income $ (201,783) $ 5,580 $ (73,720) $ (6,250) WASTEWATER FUND Revenues: Permits& Fees $ 46,617 $ 65,900 70.74% $ 9,986 $ 77,570 12.87% Charges for Services 764,005 1,425,850 53.58% 746,362 1,435,002 52.01% Other Revenues 150 - n/a - - n/a Revenue from Use of Money 164,330 328,660 50.00% 151,418 303,940 49.82% Total Revenues 975,102 1,820,410 53.56% 907,766 1,816,512 . 49.97% Expenditures: Employee Services 145,386 310,150 46.88% 142,483 288,390 49.41% Services and Supplies 207,312 540,260 38.37% 219,806 546,550 4 Capital 763,551 2,150,500 35.51% 111,208 2,021,680 0 Debt Service 25,625 76,550 33.47% 28,033 80,250 34.93% Total Expenditures 1,141,874 3,077,460 37.10% 501,530 2,936,870 17.08% Net Income $ (166,772) $ (1,257,050) $ 406,236 $ (1,120,358) rr, Page 2 L, J 9 OTHER FUNDS REVENUE AND EXPENSE SUMMARY 1999-2000 1998-99 DEC 1999 DEC 1998 YEAR TO DATE ADJUSTED YEAR TO DATE ADJUSTED ACTUAL BUDGET PERCENTAGE ACTUAL BUDGET PERCENTAGE BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND Revenues: Charges for Services $ 112,335 $ 224,670 50.00% $ 120,855 $ 303,500 39.82% Interest 500 1,500 33.33% 70 - n/a Total Revenues 112,835 226,170 49.89% 120,925 303,500 39.84% Expenditures: Employee Services 58,622 113,530 51.64% 62,449 115,860 53.90% Services and Supplies 47,330. 83,780 56.49% 39,776 77,400 51.39% Capital Outlay 10,539 60,300 17.48% 15,624 71,100 21.97% Total Expenditures 116,491 257,610 45.22% 117,849 264,360 44.58% Net Income $ (3,656) $ (31,440) $ 3,076 $ 39,140 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES AND REPLACEMENT evenues: Charges for Services $ 120,870 $ 241,740 50.00% $ 54,270 $ 235,775 23.02% Interest 2,500 5,000 50.00% 5,161 - n/a Total Revenues 123,370 246,740 50.00% 59,431 235,775 25.21% Expenditures: Employee Services 67,995 86,760 78.37% 26,704 59,700 44.73% Services and Supplies 14,462 25,350 57.05% 5,528 20,800 26.58% Capital Outlay 115,476 231,860 49.80% - 273,955 0.00% Reserves 43,185 86,370 50.00% - 60,320 0.00% Total Expenditures 241,118 430,340 56.03% 32,232 414,775 7.77% Net Income $ (117,748) $ (183,600) $ 27,199 $ (179,000) VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND Revenues: Charges for Services $ 87,760 $ 175,520 50.00% $ - $ 39,700 0.00% Interest 10,000 20,000 50.00% - - n/a Total Revenues 97,760 195,520 50.00% - 39,700 0.00% Expenditures: Capital Outlay 54,765 53,970 101.47% - 34,000 0.00% Reserves 87,760 175,520 50.00% - - - Total Expenditures 142,525 229,490 62.11% - 34,000 0.00% Net Income $ (44,765) $ (33,970) $ - $ 5,700 % 3U Page 3 OTHER FUNDS REVENUE AND EXPENSE SUMMARY 1999-2000 1998-99 DEC 1999 DEC 1998 _0 YEAR TO DATE ADJUSTED YEAR TO DATE ADJUSTED ACTUAL BUDGET PERCENTAGE ACTUAL BUDGET PERCENTAGE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION FUND Revenues: BIA Business License Dues $ 609 $ 11,000 5.54% $ 7,310 $ - n/a Advertising& Fund Raising 3,140 - n/a 4,420 - n/a Donations 3,355 1,500 223.67% 50 - n/a Interest - 50 0.00% 14 - n/a Total Revenues 7,104 12,550 56.61% 11,794 - n/a Expenditures: Services and Supplies 8,153 11,300 72.15% 1,346 - n/a Capital Outlay 1,000 2,700 37.04% 3,916 - n/a Total Expenditures 9,153 14,000 65.38% 5,262 - n/a Net Income $ (2,049) $ (1,450) $ 6,532 $ - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT Revenues: 1994 CDBG Funds $ - $ 12,000 0.00% $ - $ - n/a 1995 CDBG Funds - - n/a - 21,200 1996 CDBG Funds - 33,020 0.00% 13,559 68,120 1 0 1997 CDBG Funds - 148,150 0.00% 35,329 177,160 19.94% 1998 CDBG Funds 5,000 204,050 2.45% 4,000 231,310 1.73% 1999 CDBG Funds 82,673 205,760 40.18% - - n/a Total Revenues 87,673 602,980 14.54% 52,888 497,790 10.62% Expenditures: 1994 CDBG Funds - 12,000 0.00% - - n/a 1995 CDBG Funds - - n/a - 20,860 0.00% 1996 CDBG Funds - 32,160 0.00% 13,559 46,970 28.87% 1997 CDBG Funds 1,215 132,270 0.92% 35,329 173,730 20.34% 1998 CDBG Funds 38,724 190,790 20.30% 4,000 256,230 1.56% 1999 CDBG Funds 90,132 235,760 38.23% - - n/a Total Expenditures 130,071 602,980 21.57% 52,888 497,790 10.62% Net Income $ (42,398) $ - $ - $ - TREE PLANT FUND Revenues: Impact Fees $ 17,707 $ 10,000 177.07% $ - $ - n/a Interest - 2,000 0.00% 653 200 326.65% Total Revenues 17,707 12,000 147.56% 653 200 Expenditures: Capital Outlay 6,040 5,020 120.32% - 2,000 0.00% Total Expenditures 6,040 5,020 120.32% - 2,000 0.00% Net Income $ 11,667 $ 6,980 $ 653 $ (1,800) E`'. 91 Page 4 OTHER FUNDS REVENUE AND EXPENSE SUMMARY 1999-2000 1998-99 is DEC 1999 DEC 1998 YEAR TO DATE ADJUSTED YEAR TO DATE ADJUSTED ACTUAL BUDGET PERCENTAGE ACTUAL BUDGET PERCENTAGE DRAINAGE IMPACT FEES Revenues: Impact Fees $ 55,902 $ 88,700 63.02% $ 35,567 $ 43,400 81.95% Interest 3,250 6,500 50.00% 6,451 1,500 430.07% Total Revenues 59,152 95,200 62.13% 42,018 44,900 93.58% Expenditures: Buena Ave Storm Drain - - n/a 92 80,000 0.12% Azucena Drainage 430 42,000 1.02% 5,528 45,000 12.28% San Anselmo Drainage - - n/a - 13,320 0.00% Minor Drainage 23,499 50,000 47.00% 1,904 36,680 5.19% Transfer to Capital Projects - - n/a 22,249 75,770 29.36% Total Expenditures 23,929 92,000 26.01% 29,773 250,770 11.87% Net Income $ 35,223 $ 3,200 $ 12,245 $ (205,870) AMAPOA TECORIDA IMPACT FEES FUND Revenues: Impact Fees $ 28,221 $ 25,000 112.88% $ 32,077 $ 20,000 160.39% Interest (1,500) (5,000) 30.00% 4,536 - n/a Total Revenues 26,721 20,000 133.61% 36,613 20,000 183.07% Expenditures: Transfer to Capital Projects - - n/a 324,270 324,270 100.00% Total Expenditures - - n/a 324,270 324,270 100.00% Net Income $ 26,721 $ 20,000 $ (287,657) $ (304,270) STREETS AND BRIDGES IMPACT FEES Revenues: Impact Fees $ 172,285 $ 197,900 87.06% $ 77,576 $ 76,850 100.94% Revenues from Other Agencies - 296,600 0.00% - 92,000 0.00% Interest 6,875 13,750 50.00% 13,357 5,000 267.14% Total Revenues 179,160 508,250 35.25% 90,933 173,850 52.31% Expenditures: Santa Lucia Culvert Extension 267 40,000 0.67% 3,675 33,000 11.14% Minor Road Repair Projects 20,193 50,000 40.39% 1,557 43,000 3.62% Garcia Road Bridge 22,716 345,800 6.57% 5,564 83,820 6.64% Santa Lucia Road Bridge - 30,000 0.00% 597 27,660 2.16% Del Rio Road Bridge 622 20,000 3.11% 5,015 25,000 20.06% Atascadero Avenue Slope 7,809 - n/a 4,267 36,000 11.85% Traffic Way/101 Interchange PSR 49,369 79,340 62.22% - - n/a Montecito Avenue Improvements 7,659 - n/a 1,759 66,910 2.63% EI Camino Crack Sealing n/a 16,340 21,000 77.81% Graves Creek Overlay n/a 311,476 350,840 88.78% Transfer to Capital Projects - - n/a - 14,000 0.00% Total Expenditures 108,635 565,140 19.22% 350,250 701,230 49.95% Net Income $ 70,525 $ (56,890) $ (259,317) $ (527,380) Page 5 C. 92 OTHER FUNDS REVENUE AND EXPENSE SUMMARY 1999-2000 1998-99 --* DEC 1999 DEC 1998 YEAR TO DATE ADJUSTED YEAR TO DATE ' ADJUSTED ACTUAL BUDGET PERCENTAGE ACTUAL BUDGET PERCENTAGE LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS Revenues: Local Transportation Funds $ - $ 520,960 0.00% $ 31,256 $ 81,500 38.35% Interest 2,500 5,000 50.00% 5,090 2,000 254.50% Total Revenues 2,500 525,960 0.48% 36,346 83,500 43.53% Expenditures: Portola Road Overlay 29,933 319,300 9.37% - - n/a San Anselmo Avenue Overlay 188 81,100 0.23% - - n/a Bus Stop Amenities - 30,000 0.00% - - n/a Transfer to Capital Projects - 3,820 0.00% - 175,000 0.00% Total Expenditures 30,121 434,220 6.94% - 175,000 0.00% Net Income $ (27,621) $ 91,740 $ 36,346 $ (91,500) SIDEWALK IN-LIEU Revenues: Interest $ 400 $ 800 50.00% $ 1,238 $ 200 610 Total Revenues 400 800 50.00% 1,238 200 619.00% Expenditures: Transfer to Capital Projects - 5,000 0.00% 103 35,000 0.30% Total Expenditures - 5,000 0.00% 103 35,000 0.30% Net Income $ 400 $ (4,200) $ 1,135 $ (34,800) PARKS & RECREATION IMPACT FEES Revenues: Parks Impact Fees $ 90,919 $ 152,400 59.66% $ 71,309 $ 92,150 77.38% Rental Income - 4,800 0.00% - - n/a Interest - 2,000 0.00% 2,068 400 516.97% Total Revenues 90,919 159,200 57.11% 73,377 92,550 79.28% Expenditures: Purchase Property 794 60,000 1.32% - - n/a Misc Lake Park Projects - - n/a 2,582 106,000 2.44% Lake Park Irrigation Project 10,431 11,000 94.83% - - n/a Lake Park Parking Lot Overlay 34,448 35,000 98.42% - 20,000 0.00% Debt Service 10,266 48,570 21.14% - 48,160 - Total Expenditures 55,939 154,570 36.19% 2,582 174,160 1!� Net Income $ 34,980 $ 4,630 $ 70,795 $ (81,610) C33 Page 6 OTHER FUNDS REVENUE AND EXPENSE SUMMARY 1999-2000 1998-99 0 DEC 1999 DEC 1998 YEAR TO DATE ADJUSTED YEAR TO DATE ADJUSTED ACTUAL BUDGET PERCENTAGE ACTUAL BUDGET PERCENTAGE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Revenues: Permits and Fees $ 5,248 $ 7,900 66.43% $ 3,212 $ 2,000 160.60% State Revenues and Grants 31,946 1,597,080 2.00% 40,371 686,670 5.88% Interest - (1,500) n/a 10,299 - n/a Transfer from other funds - 8,820 0.00% 346,519 624,040 55.53% Total Revenues 37,194 1,612,300 2.31% 400,401 1,312,710 30.50% Expenditures: Atascadero Mall Overlay 129,935 126,390 102.80% 8,056 139,000 5.80% Monterey Rd Overlay 155 101,400 0.15% - - n/a EI Camino Widening 7,607 228,500 3.33% - - n/a Bikeway Master Plan 1,849 15,000 12.33% - 15,000 n/a EI Camino Bikeway, Phase II 1,197 75,000 1.60% 533 73,100 0.73% Chico Avenue Storm Drain 242 81,300 0.30% - - n/a Suggested Routes to School 4,945 141,900 3.48% - 171,900 n/a Balboa Rd Shoulder Repair - 25,760 0.00% - - n/a Garcia Rd Swale Repair 1,928 10,920 17.66% - - n/a EI Camino Real Rehabilitation 432 408,300 0.11% - - n/a Curbaril Avenue Storm Drain 188 197,200 0.10% - - n/a Traffic Way Storm Drain 736 148,300 0.50% - - n/a EI Camino Real Bikeway, Phase - 140,000 0.00% - - n/a Santa Cruz Rd Slope Rehabilitati 12,227 35,880 34.08% - - n/a Amapoa Tecorida Storm Drain 5,011 125,950 3.98% 363,163 467,340 77.71% Traffic Way/101 Interchange PSR - - n/a - 75,000 0.00% Portola Rd Overlay Project - - n/a - 354,300 0.00% Traffic Way Bikeway - - n/a - 15,070 0.00% FEMA Small Projects - - n/a 12,722 - n/a Total Expenditures 166,452 1,861,800 8.94% 384,474 1,310,710 29.33% Net Income $ (129,258) $ (249,500) $ 15,927 $ 2,000 POLICE IMPACT FEES Revenues: Police Impact Fees $ 43,571 $ 56,800 76.71% $ 16,099 $ 15,800 101.89% Total Revenues 43,571 56,800 76.71% 16,099 15,800 101.89% Expenditures: Debt Service 5,800 13,000 44.62% 6,764 15,800 42.81% Total Expenditures 5,800 13,000 44.62% 6,764 15,800 42.81% Net Income $ 37,771 $ 43,800 $ 9,335 $ - C 90 4 Page 7 OTHER FUNDS REVENUE AND EXPENSE SUMMARY 1999-2000 1998-99 DEC 1999 DEC 1998 _0 YEAR TO DATE ADJUSTED YEAR TO DATE ADJUSTED ACTUAL BUDGET PERCENTAGE ACTUAL BUDGET PERCENTAGE FIRE IMPACT FEES Revenues: Fire Impact Fees $ 52,121 $ 46,300 112.57% $ 36,970 $ 40,000 92.42% Rental Income 5,400 10,800 50.00% 5,400 10,800 50.00% Interest 2,000 4,000 50.00% 1,969 1,000 196.85% Total Revenues 59,521 61,100 97.42% 44,338 51,800 85.59% Expenditures: Operating - - n/a (18) 50 -35.00% Debt Service - 35,680 0.00% - 35,680 0.00% Total Expenditures - 35,680 0.00% (18) 35,730 -0.05% Net Income $ 59,521 $ 25,420 $ 44,356 $ 16,070 STREET ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FUND Revenues: Assessments $ 1,038 $ 1,920 54.06% $ 1,060 $ 2,100 5 0 Interest 1,000 2,000 50.00% 1,307 2,500 52.27% Total Revenues 2,038 3,920 51.99% 2,367 4,600 51.45% Expenditures: Operating - - n/a 1,675 - n/a Capital Outlay - 50,910 0.00% 1,678 - n/a Total Expenditures - 50,910 0.00% 3,353 - 0.00% Net Income $ 2,038 $ (46,990) $ (986) $ 4,600 C ?5 Page 8 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REVENUE AND EXPENSE SUMMARY 1999-2000 1998-99 DEC 1999 DEC 1998 YEAR TO DATE ADJUSTED YEAR TO DATE ADJUSTED ACTUAL BUDGET PERCENTAGE ACTUAL BUDGET PERCENTAGE Revenues: Assessments $ - $ - n/a $ - $ n/a Interest - - n/a 23 - n/a Total Revenues - - n/a 23 - n/a Expenditures: Employee Services 18,170 36,340 50.00% - - n/a Operations - 10,000 0.00% 187 2,000 9.35% Main Street Program 3,548 51,570 n/a - - Permits 25 - n/a 4,400 - n/a Contract Services 14,207 20,000 71.04% 15,675 104,000 15.07% Finance Charges - 44,000 0.00% - - n/a Professional Development 2,787 - n/a - - n/a Total Expenditures 38,737 161,910 23.93% 20,262 106,000 19.12% Net Income $ (38,737) $ (161,910) $ (20,239) $ (106,000) L 16 Page 9 ALL FUNDS REVENUES BY CATEGORY Annual Comparison $3,000,000 Y� Revenues thru December 31, 1999 q ©Revenues thru December 31 19988 NO $2,500,000 : x Es a 3 Z' a s '/ e'`•... r a\ �r"*1' 3aP� k9 � 'wr yn� `s �i'•} a x *3 ��i �- � � a`� a�t�` a"�^•, a li 5D- $2,000,000 t$2,000,000 y- :; `�A �r r a '�a is .5'�a'�.` �3.s'� "��,��'a � �"� a� �a�•^ ,� ikrr 2§011 $1,500,000 42 " y b ,z a $1,000,000a A, W s $500,000777777 5 Taxes Permits and Fees Intergovernmental Charges for Services Fines and Revenue from Use Other Revenues Forfeitures of Money Revenues thru Revenues thru December 31, 1999 December 31, 1998 Taxes $ 2,645,879 $ 2,475,194 Permits and Fees 719,551 507,013 Intergovernmental 989,687 975,283 Charges for Services 1,557,657 1,331,163 Fines and Forfeitures 33,550 27,456 Revenue from Use of Money 222,755 238,021 Other Revenues 264,419 598,794 $ 6,433,498 $ 6,152,924 Page 10 ALL FUNDS REVENUES BY CATEGORY Budget vs. Actuals $6,000,000 ❑Budgeted Difference F Revenues thru December 31 1999 $5,000,000 Rz xe rz x,.- .� A� � y5 �y�� asp. 'y.� ""� �,y. ✓;� �� ��y�� ; � �s $4,000,000p, N $3,000,000 04 err 7 € Y $2,000,000 _ .� ✓ .,¢r}r �/ y �i a f $1,000,000 j gY 11 411 n4l : bRV r Taxes Permits and Fees Intergovernmental Charges for Fines and Revenue from Use Other Revenues Services Forfeitures of Money Revenues thru Budgeted December 31, 1999 1999-2000 Taxes $ 2,645,879 $ 5,660,120 Permits and Fees 719,551 948,400 Intergovernmental 989,687 5,334,230 Charges for Services 1,557,657 2,928,220 Fines and Forfeitures 33,550 53,350 Revenue from Use of Money 222,755 451,360 Other Revenues 264,419 601,910 $ 6,433,498 $ 15,977,590 C r o v c7 Page 11 ALL FUNDS EXPENDITURES BY CATEGORY Annual Comparison $3,500,000 s A ■Expenditures thru December 31,1999 , `E . 0 Expenditures thru December 31 1998 �vn ^` ,v14 g4 $3,000,000 s u ' F 7 . � ' ���n. ,c.5 E - reser..: ✓ 1���. a i a- �" av ,� `� � $2,500,000 r a f r ff s Ey a? 1v $2,000,000 IV f y t � NO, a s ; eiXf� ,W y, f UMNI , $1500 000 i f� Y $1,000,000 ��y 1 � 13'A_ 3 $` 1� tea'• "Z 9 J cj - $500,000 / "'N F Employee Operations Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses Reserves Services I i Expenditures thru Expenditures thru December 31, 1999 December 31, 1998 Employee Services $ 3,168,201 $ 2,930,976 Operations 1,995,161 1,679,407 Capital Outlay 1,516,264 949,096 Debt Service 88,542 119,805 Other Uses 79,130 411,876 Reserves 130,945 - $ 6,978,243 $ 6,091,160 C Page 12 ALL FUNDS EXPENDITURES BY CATEGORY Budget vs. Actuals i i $7,000,000 ®Difference 1999-2000If 3 kku y a ■Expenditures thru December 31 1999 x ry , $6,000,000 $5,000,000xon y .X y i3vs�Sx., Ina" k� ✓ - Ywii 1 ` 3 - FSi' a/ .:*.rr' ' � 805 S.° r orf a / w $4,000,000 �° '��"" / I $3,000,000 26 $2,000,000 ' � r - �'" y- .' i" "Al c jyl�� JI AA 4 i $1,000,000 Y $- .. Employee Operations Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses Reserves Services i i I Expenditures thru Budgeted December 31, 1999 1999-2000 Employee Services $ 3,168,201 $ 6,450,710 Operations 1,995,161 4,564,750 Capital Outlay 1,516,264 5,966,260 Debt Service 88,542 315,250 Other Uses 79,130 167,080 Reserves 130,945 261,890 $ 6,978,243 $ 17,725,940 1 (0 0 Page 13 GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY CATEGORY Annual Comparison $3,000,000 Revenues thru December 31, 1999 Revenues thru December 31 1998 5�`Y '.� 3 .mac � �3 �"•& �: =e �'�`��%�3.s'f' r�_ y' ��& $2,500,000 an $2,000,000 z � �� -�%t � r� - .� a �' � Y �;' � �A 3!���� �� "� '. / •�- z: ' a 5 M $1,500,000 �r 04 a ws y �' as a' s r: t r "fik',s se $1,000,000 ak oea z z n hg- $500,000 3� r ✓ t 6 'H— AM21 _ y hx a s w Taxes Permits and Fees Intergovernmental Charges for Fines and Revenue from Use Other Revenues Services Forfeitures of Money Revenues thru Revenues thru December 31, 1999 December 31, 1998 Taxes $ 2,644,232 $ 2,466,824 Permits and Fees 206,960 222,149 Intergovernmental 672,758 548,177 Charges for Services 448,518 384,840 Fines and Forfeitures 33,550 27,456 Revenue from Use of Money 25,000 30,732 Other Revenues 181,579 183,507 Total Revenues $ 4,212,597 $ 3,863,685 101 Page 14 GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY CATEGORY Budget vs. Actuals $6,000,000 \t �� ❑Difference 1999-2000 , h �y Revenues thru December 31 1999a $5,000,000 r z. �� ' tea, k - $4 000,000yz °,; n� + r r a �y U $3 000 000 F1 All Ilk4 $2,000,000 4 f Wa '05/1 v , z ,'�2x $1,000,000 a r y ✓'� a�, ry ��F � x�, � rte,> r Taxes Permits and Fees Intergovernmental Charges for Fines and Revenue from Use Other Revenues I Services Forfeitures of Money Revenues thru Budgeted December 31, 1999 1999-2000 Taxes $ 2,644,232 $ 5,647,200 Permits and Fees 206,960 297,500 Intergovernmental 672,758 1,395,890 Charges for Services 448,518 820,440 Fines and Forfeitures 33,550 53,350 Revenue from Use of Money 25,000 50,000 Other Revenues 181,579 433,330 Total Revenues $ 4,212,597 $ 8,697,710 102 Page 15 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES BY CATEGORY Annual Comparison $3,000,000 ■Expenditures thru December 31,\1999 , f , � '' r�ar✓.5 'a Expenditures thru December 31 1998 02, $2,500,000 r rte x x $2,000,000 $1,500,000 w'" M. IN $1,000,00 14 0 Fwf $500,000 , - F � F � � w c Employee Operations Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses Services Expenditures thru Expenditures thru December 31, 1999 December 31, 1998 Employee Services $ 2,792,427 $ 2,601,995 Operations 1,176,375 964,650 Capital Outlay 144,518 43,558 Debt Service 46,851 85,008 0 Other Uses 79,130 87,503 $ 4,239,301 $ 3,782,714 jr3 Page 16 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES BY CATEGORY is Budget vs. Actuals $7,000,000 \ ` \ El Difference z 1 ■Expenditures thru December 31 1999 �ti.? $6,000,000 20 \ ` Mft $5,000,000 4y 4 k $4,000,000 S _ pix' $3,000,000 ' s k & . 1��-Yz 2 � �, P�' �a✓'�i, ��,�r ! ,�yea l z � "€,. � .s' �"i z v n � e $2,000,000 m �tiq F .r3.M1 VR" , al $1,000,000 a t " s An Employee Operations Capital Outlay Debt Service Other Uses Services Expenditures thru Budgeted December 31, 1999 1999-2000 Employee Services $ 2,792,427 $ 5,727,480 Operations 1,176,375 2,464,470 Capital Outlay 144,518 290,660 Debt Service 46,851 141,450 Other Uses 79,130 158,260 $ 4,239,301 $ 8,782,320 X04 Page 17 ADMINISTRATION EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT Annual Comparison $300,000 ■Exependitures thru December 31, 1998 ; ❑Exependitures thru December 31 1999 � F $250,000 �� \ \/ ?'�\ Y Y $200,000 e '20yIP �/ x r� R- $150,000 � N � z �A W111 bus " w � $100,000 410 ,R r r' --A F $50,00Aim 0 tP fl ig s rx \^ r City Council City Clerk City Treasurer Legal and City Manager Administrative Technology Special Legal Services i Expenditures thru Expenditures thru December 31,1999 December 31,1998 City Council $ 90,233 $ 70,707 City Clerk 2,307 3,681 City Treasurer 1,758 1,634 Legal and Special Legal 67,406 41,377 City Manager 158,409 160,080 Administrative Services 164,208 147,668 Technology 241,118 32,232 1 q 10 5 Page 18 ADMINISTRATION EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT Budget vs. Actuals $500,000 E)Budgeted 1999-2000 ti ■Expenditures thru December 31,1999 Y a ° $450,000 $400,000 Vp $350,000 % %x $300,000 X « sg X. 'L gx'ksw� a3 .ey'kn l $250,000 y $200,000 Ell ` .rr`'" .t ��.,.: $150,000r � y � r . a i $100,000 WNx r � a . W, $50,000 �,� �. �' ��. 1 r City Council City Clerk City Treasurer Legal and City Manager Administrative Technology Special Legal Services - I Expenditures thru Budgeted December 31,1999 1999-2000 City Council $ 90,233 $ 243,550 City Clerk 2,307 7,430 City Treasurer 1,758 3,890 Legal and Special Legal 67,406 94,050 City Manager 158,409 473,830 Administrative Services 164,208 443,670 Technology 241,118 430,340 Page 19 POLICE, FIRE, & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT Annual Comparison $1,600,000 _ 5, ■Expenditures thru December 31,1999 l7 Expenditures thru December 31 1998 k $1,400,000 a4 ` r *n ^4 $1,200,000 y u , $1,000,000 mw xA �' $800,000 ; s i yam✓ z � � ��� �-P $600,000 / x t $400,000 R> M $200,000 y � &� �e i Police Fire Community Development i I Expenditures thru Expenditures thru December 31,1999 December 31,1998 Police $ 1,490,455 $ 1,442,118 Fire 817,902 773,140 Community Development 384,534 334,805 Page 20 POLICE, FIRE, & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT Budget vs. Actuals $3,500,000 El Difference / ■Expenditures thru December 31 1999 a t x e b r r $3,000,000 M�'-� � 3 � a 4 \ n a €k fal NOW $2,500,000 'Al x f ti sMN / r r �. 71"o, $2,000,000 �.;' ` fl c 7 g $1,500,000 � . � "ti. �M titi"}, ��titi ; u s N NO k !'kr N ypAlfn % % titi % $1,000,000 ." 1 �`t'; Aw fWS y S. t %`P.�✓° t '�syr 7 2 = r $500,000 v � y s 10> r i f s k $- a ,moi Police Fire Community Development Expenditures thru Budgeted December 31,1999 1999-2000 Police $ 1,490,455 $ 2,981,850 Fire 817,902 1,562,180 Community Development 384,534 822,700 Page 21 COMMUNITY SERVICES EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT Annual Comparison $250,000 nonlwbwgmr �. ■Expendituresthru December 31,1999 *Expenditures thru December 31 1998 rg� y v \ ; °-0 " r£ $200,000 MCI 6 F1 ME J, 5 $150,000 f � y „g e h 1 ,�„+�,, � Aft� %� „�✓z $100,000Al% / y y r z4 , a $50,000 : s � , k„ v I Community Recreation Lake Pavilion Zoo Building Services Maintenance Expenditures thru Expenditures thru December 31,1999 December 31,1998 Community Services $ 96,691 $ 85,566 Recreation 184,010 195,383 Lake Pavilion 64,393 48,551 Zoo 193,777 165,248 Building Maintenance 116,491 117,849 ., Page 22 COMMUNITY SERVICES EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT Budget vs. Actuals $450,000 El Difference r� a "M _ ■Expenditures thru December 31,1999 $400,000 VIP s N � 'f - �ZNS �u Via" a ,t» rrrlr`F � z "s r 3 A M, 3 r y �c�e` � s§ �"s r rrr 1r:s• z \r 'Ae° $350,000 �W � iz f yr rr �4y Rch�a,',.r rr � $300,000 t c \Y rrrr rrrr`:r x , r $250 000 � � � z 5,000 200,000 ' $150,000 $100,000MV Rl, $50,000tx / 4, 12"t,' Community Recreation Lake Pavilion Zoo Building Services Maintenance i Expenditures thru Budgeted December 31,1999 1999-2000 Community Services $ 96,691 $ 193,000 Recreation 184,010 371,050 Lake Pavilion 64,393 173,890 Zoo 193,777 384,660 Building Maintenance 116,491 257,610 Page 23 PUBLIC WORKS EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT Annual Comparison $1,200,000 s ■Expenditures thru December 31,1999 z El Expenditures thru December 31,19 $1,000,000 � � f Awe r Im _ $800,000 . � a fix $600,000 r 1',ns v A cit 'Y & a rz s 01 s, $400,000 TRS Y C 4� iib 6"a F Al ITZ � Se r w $200,000 h $ r_ x � Parks Engineering Streets Transit Wastewater Expenditures thru Expenditures thru December 31,1999 December 31,1998 mi Parks $ 237,860 $ 173,727 Engineering 78,580 53,337 Streets 337,277 319,867 Transit 223,517 177,267 Wastewater 1,141,874 501,530 Page 24 -� PUBLIC WORKS EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT Budget vs. Actuals $3,500,000 y ... PH 2 ;f i ®Budgeted 1999-2000 K x° ■Expenditures thru December 31 1999 3 $3,000,000 r as a rAs s $2,500,000lm ` r � - M'` As,* E F, y r $2,000,000Ar R zow" � W IN , �7Q "41 tA $1,500,000 , � r °� $1,000,000 f OR Nazi - s Rn41 • 'f�#"'ot y $500,000 I Parks Engineering Streets Transit Wastewater I Expenditures thru Budgeted December 31,1999 1999-2000 Parks $ 237,860 $ 400,060 Engineering 78,580 202,860 Streets 337,277 639,260 Transit 223,517 475,140 Wastewater 1,141,874 3,077,460 Page 25 12 ORANGE COUNTY RECEIVABLE Original Receivable Balance at Percentage Fund Balance December 31, 1999 of Total 100 General Fund $ 152,832.93 $ 106,709.41 13.229% 250 Tree Plant Fund 4,800.53 3,351.77 0.416% 250 ANTA Fund 205.54 143.51 0.018% 260 Gas Tax Fund 27,963.58 19,524.43 2.420% 265 Local Transportation Fund 84,761.36 59,181.19 7.337% 267 Street Assessment Fund 8,845.28 6,175.85 0.766% 270 Sidewalk In Lieu 6,665.65 4,654.03 0.577% 280 Developer Fees Fund 64.63 45.12 0.006% 281 Public Works Impact Fees 65,681.88 45,859.72 5.685% 282 Drainage Impact Fees Fund 59,961.71 41,865.82 5.190% 283 Amapoa Tecorida Impact Fees 29,748.97 20,771.01 2.575% 285 Fire Impact Fees Fund 29,234.94 20,412.12 2.531% 287 Parks & Rec Impact Fees Fund 475.16 331.76 0.041% 310 Capital Projects Fund 5,824.79 4,066.92 0.504% 403 Assessment District#3 2,163.93 1,510.88 0.187% 404 Assessment District#4 16,556.52 11,559.93 1.433% 405 Assessment District#5 5,603.51 3,912.41 0.485% 407 Assessment District#7 36.15 27.70 0.003% 489 1989 COP Fund 1,995.58 1,393.33 0.173% 492 1992 Street Improvement Fund 46,687.03 32,597.32 4.041% 493 1993 Camino Real Improvement Fund 63,419.31 44,277.50 5.490% 527 Wastewater Operations Fund 484,977.85 338,616.11 41.979% 527 Wastewater Capital Fund 55,641.48 38,849.41 4.816% 529 Transit Fund 1,134.73 792.27 0.098% $ 1,155,283.04 $ 806,629.52 100.000% Page 26 ITEM NUMBER: C-2 DATE: 03/14/2000 oil 0 M 1A 1918 ' ® 1979 Atascadero City Council City Manager's Office Information Bulletin A. Employee Update Gary Wilms Building Inspector II Resigned 2/11/2000 David Sweetland Maintenance Worker 1, Zoo Separated 2/8/2000 John Macari Reserve Firefighter Hired 2/25/2000 Timothy Thompson Reserve Firefighter Hired 2/25/2000 Mike Oliver Reserve Firefighter Hired 2/29/2000 Nancy Bryner Zoo Cashier Hired 3/1/2000 1 .14