HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 05/11/1999 7-4"W'.0
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL'
MEETING
TUESDAY,MAY 11, 1999
City of Atascadero
6500 Palma Avenue,4"'floor
Atascadero,California
CLOSED SESSION,6:30 P.M.:
1. Public Employee Performance Evaluation: City Attorney (Govt. Code§54957)
2. Conference with labor negotiator(Govt. Code Sec.54957.6)
Agency Negotiator: City Manager
Employee organizations: Department Heads, Mid-Management/Professional,
Confidential,Atascadero Fire Captains,Atascadero Firefighters,Service
l mpl' yees Intl. Union Local 620,Atascadero Police Assoc.
3. Confe ence with negotiator over real property. (Govt. Code 54956.8)
Negot ator: City Manager Wade McKinney
Prope y: APN#028-092-009,#056-322-010,and#056-322-011.
Negot lations will include price and/or terms of payment.
REGULAR SESSION, 7:00 P.M.:
j
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council Member Lerno
ROLL CALL: Mayor Johnson
Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide
Council Member Clay
Council Member Lerno
Council Member Luna
APPROVAL OF A ENDA: Roll Call`
PRESENTATIONS:
1 Zoological Society of San Luis Obispo County -Paul Hood,President of the Society will
present to the Council Kathleen Mason,the new Development Coordinator for the
Society.
2. Proclamation-Declaring May 15 1999 "Police Memorial bay"
COMMUNITY FORUM:
(This portion of the meeting'is reserved for persons wanting to address the Council on any
matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to
five minutes. Please state your name and address for the record before makingyour
presentation. The Council may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a
future agenda.)
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS:
(On their own initiative, Council Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on
their own activities. Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to
sta or take action to have sta lace a matter o business on a tune agenda. No formal action
.� .�P .f .� g
by the Council will be taken unless an item is identified on the Agenda.)
A CONSENT CALENDAR: Roll Call
(All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and non-controversial by
City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Council or public
wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the
item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered in the listed
sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council
concerning the item before action is taken,)
1. City Council Minutes - April 27, 1999 - (City Clerk recommendation: Approve the City
Council minutes of April 13, 1999) [Marcia McClure Torgerson]
2. Atascadero Mall Overlay Projecf - Fiscal Impact: $144,932 (Staff recommendation:
Council authorize the Mayor to execute an agreement with AJ Diani Construction
Company, Inc. to construct the Atascadero Mall Overlay Project at a`maximum cost of
$144,932 and make the necessary appropriations) [Brady Cherry]
B. WASTEWATER STUDY SESSION - A review of the wastewater'treatment` plan
(operations and capacity) and collection system.
2
C. PUBLIC HE NGS:
1. General Plan Amendment #99002 - Urban Services Line Extension Fiscal Impact:
Increase to W7stewater revenues (Staff recommendation: Council adopt Resolution No.
1999-026 app oving extension of Urban Services Line) [Paul Saldana]
2. Appeal of Pluming Commission Approval - Tentative Parcel Map #98010 Fiscal
Impact Minor increase in City revenue and development fees (Staff recommendation:
Council con ct appeal hearing and direct staff to prepare appropriate resolutions)
[Paul Saldai ]
D. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Annual Audi - for 1998-99 fiscal audit -Fiscal Impact: $10,250 of budgeted funds
(Staff recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement
with Moss, Ley& Hartzheim to conduct the 1998-99 fiscal audit at a cost of$10,250.00)
[Rachelle Rickard]
2. Re uest`for Use of the Youth Center Atascadero Boxing Club - Fiscal Impact: Possible
revenue to be determined (Staff recommendation: Council reaffirm the previous policy
on the current use of the Youth Center and postpone making a decision on the request by
the Atascaderg Boxing Club) [Brady Cherry]
3. 4`h of July Fir Works Display - Atascadero Lake Park - Fiscal Impact: approximately
$4,620.00 ( taff recommendation: Council approve a request by Bill Rabenaldt to
conduct a professionally staffed pyrotechnical fireworks display at AtascaderoLake Park
on Sunday, JiVy 4, 1999) [Brady Cherry]
4. Information Bulletin
E. COMMITTEE REPORTS
(The followi g represent standing committees. Informative status reports will be given,
as felt necesstry.):
1. S.L.O. Council of Governments/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority
2. Finance Corn nittee
3. Water Comm ttees
A. SLO ounty Flood Control & Water Conservation District Water Resources
Advis ry Committee
B. Naci iento Water Purveyors' Contract Technical Advisory Committee
C. North County Water Forum
• 4. Integrated W ste Management Authority
5. North Count) Council
3
6 Air Pollution Control District
7.. County Mayor's Round Table
8. Economic Vitality Corporation,Board of Directors
9. City/Schools Committee
10. Economic Opportunity Commission
F. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
1. City Council
2._ City Attorney
3. City Clerk
4. City Treasurer
G. ADJOURNMENT:
THE CITYCOUNCIL WILL ADJOURN TO THE NEXT REGULAR SESSION
SCHEDULED ON MAY 25, 1999:
Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this
Agenda in court, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public'
hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or
prior to this public hearing.
4
City of Atascadero
WEI COME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
GE
NERAL INFORMATION
The City Council meet 3-in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m.,
in the Council Chambe r of City Hall. Matters are considered by the Council in the order of the printed
Agenda.
Copies of the staff rep,)rts or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the
Agenda are on file in t ie office of the CityClerk(Room 208),and in the Information Office(Room 103),
available for public in ection during City Hall business hours. An agenda packet is also available for
public review at the A scadero Library,6850 Morro Road.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act,if you need special assistance to participate in
a City meeting or other services offered by this City,please contact the City Manager's Office,(805)
461-5010,or the City lerk's Office, (805)461-5074. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting
or time when services re needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can
be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS
Members of the audience may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject,
staff will give their re ort,and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when
the public comment period is open and will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding
the matter being considered to step up to the podium. If you wish to speak for,against or comment in
any way:
• You must approach the podium and be recognized by the Mayor
• Give your name and address
• Make your statement
• All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council
• All comments limited to 5 minutes(unless changed by the Council)
• No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity
to do so,aid no one may speak more than twice on any item.
The Mayor will annou ice when the public comment period is closed,and thereafter,no further public
comments will be heat by the Council.
TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA
Under Agenda item," OMMUNITY FORUM",the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience
having business with tie Council to:
• Please apr roach the podium and be recognized
•` Give your name and address
• State the r ature of your business
This is the time items iot on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30
minutes will be allowed for Community Forum(unless changed by the Council).
TO HAVE ITEMS PLACED ON AGENDA
All business matters t. appear on the Agenda must be in the Office of the City Manager ten days
preceding the Council meeting. Should you have a matter you wish to bring before the Council,please
mail or bring a writter communication to the City Manager's office in City Hall prior to the deadline.
NATIONAL POLICE WEEK
POLICE MEMORIAL DAY
WHEREAS, Police memorial Day was first established by Presidential
Proclamation in 1960 to commemorate all law enforcement officers who had given
their life in the line of duty; and
WHEREAS, since 1960 Police Memorial day has been observed on May 15'h and
the week in which Police Memorial Day falls has been proclaimed as "National
Police Week and
WHEREAS, law enforcement officers willingly perforin hazardous duty to protect
and defend their community; and
WHEREAS, the people of our nation and state should commemorate those officers
• who have given their lives while providing service and protection to their
community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City.Council of the City of
Atascadero does hereby proclaim May 15, 1999, as
POLICE MEMORIAL DAY
in Atascadero and does call upon all citizens and law enforcement agencies to pay
tribute to those who have given the ultimate while protecting their community.
In the City of Atascadero, California this day in the year one thousand nine
hundred and ninety-nine.
Ray Johnson, Mayor
Atascadero City Council
May 11, 1999
000001 l
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 05/11/99
MINUTES
ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
TUESDAY,APRIL 27, 1999
CLOSED SESSION, 6:30 P.M.:
1) Conference with negotiator over real property. (Govt. Code 54956.8)
Negotiator: City Manager Wade McKinney
Property: APN#028-092-009, 4056-322-010, and#056-322-011.
Negotiations will include price and/or terms of payment.
2) Conference with legal counsel Anticipated litigation(G.C. Sec. 54956.9(b))
Significant exposure to litigation McFadden&Baker v. City of Atascadero
3) Conference with labor negotiator(Govt. Code Sec. 54957.6)
Agency Negotiator: City Manager
Employee organizations: Department Heads, Mid-Management/Professional,
Confidential,Atascadero Fire Captains, Atascadero Firefighters, Service
Employees Intl. Union Local 620,Atascadero Police Assoc.
• Cit Attorney Roy Hanle announced that the Council gave the City Manager direction on #1,
Y Y Y Y
and there was no reportable action on#2, and#3.
REGULAR SESSION, 7:00 P.M.:
Mayor Johnson called the Regular Session to order at 7:10 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Council Members Arrambide, Clay,Lerno, Luna and Mayor Johnson
Absent: None
Others Present: City Clerk Marcia Torgerson and City Treasurer David Graham
Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney,Police Chief Dennis Hegwood, Fire Chief
Mike McCain, Community Services Director Brady Cherry, Streets
Supervisor Brian Sword, Administrative Services Director Rachelle
Rickard, Community and Economic Development Director Paul Saldana,
Assistant City Engineer John Neil, City Attorney Roy Hanley,and
Assistant City Attorney David Fleishman.
CC 04/27/99 000602
Page 1 of 8
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 05/11/99
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Clay to
approve the agenda.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
PRESENTATIONS:
I Economic Vitality Corporation Update - President/CEO David Spaur
David Spaur, President of the EVC gave the Council a status report on the progress made by the
EVC. Mr. Spaur stated that the Board is currently focusing on business retention and expansion.
He proceeded to explain that first and foremost, the Board is using a CalWorks Grant. to
interview a local business using a questionnaire reviewed by the council. Secondly, the EVC
will research business attraction. Finally, Mr. Spaur reported that the Board will focus on
business formations and partnerships.
2. Service Award- Steve Knuckles
Fire Chief Mike McCain presented Engineer/Paramedic Steve Knuckles with a Service Award as
he is leaving his employment with the City of Atascadero.
UPDATE ON CURRENT EVENTS:
Mayor Johnson asked the Police Chief to bring the public up to. date on the issue of Megan's
Law and sexual offenders. Police Chief Dennis Hegwood explained that Megan's Law requires
convicted sexual offenders to be registered as to their location. This database is available to the
public.
Police Chief Hegwood also gave the Council a status report on Atascadero's reaction to the
shooting at the Littleton High School in Colorado. He stated that he and his officers have met
with the District to assure the students and staff the police department has and will be taking the
necessary actions and precautions to assure their safety.
COMMUNITY FORUM:
Terrill Graham, 6205 Conejo Road, stated that he feels the public is uninformed about the issues'
facing the Council because the newspaper is not reporting about the City's business. He
announced that he will be filing a recall on the two Council Members that he believes are acting
to the detriment of the City. He also asked to have Item#A-7 pulled for discussion.
CC 04/27/99 000003
Page 2 of 8
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 05/11/99
Eric Greening, 6600 Lewis Avenue, reported that he is attempting to research the CalTrans
Median Policy. Hee pressed concern regarding the Special Meeting to be held on
April 28,1999.
Rush Kolemaine, P.OBox 1990, stated that he is concerned that the public is not being kept
properly informed on Council actions. He suggested public access television would solve this
problem.
Mayor Johnson closed the Community Forum period.
COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS:
Council Member Clay asked about the fountain in Sunken Gardens being dry and suggested a
playground similar to hat of the Atascadero Lake Park Tot Lot be installed in one corner of the
Gardens.
A. CONSENT CALENDAR: Roll Call
1. Joint Citv Council / Planning Commission / Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes -
March 30, 19199 (City Clerk recommendation: Approve the Joint City Council /
Planning Commission / Parks & Recreation Commission minutes of March 30, 1999)
[Marcia McClure Torgerson]
2. City Council Minutes - April 13, 1999 - (City Clerk recommendation: Approve the City
Council minutes of April 13, 1999) [Marcia McClure Torgerson]
3. Weed Abatement Program - Fiscal Impact: None - Costs involved are recovered through
the fee charge to parcels abated by the city contractor (Staff recommendation: Council
adopt Resolution No. 1999-017, declaring vegetative growth and/or refuse a public
nuisance, comi qencing proceedings for the abatement of said nuisances, and placing all
abatement fees on the San Luis Obispo County special tax assessment for the fiscal year.
1999-2000 tax 'roll) [Mike McCain]
4. Establishment of No Parkin Zone - Palma Avenue from the intersection with Rosario
280 feet to the north - Fiscal Impact: $400.00 (Staff recommendation: Council adopt
Resolution No 1999-021 establishing a No Park Zone on Palma Avenue, from the
intersection with Rosario 280 feet to the north) [Brady Cherry]
5. Installation of Stop Si n - Los Gatos Avenue at Flores Avenue - Fiscal Impact: $200.00
(Staff recommendation: Council adopt Resolution No. 1999-020 authorizing the
installation ofa stop sign on Los Gatos Avenue at the intersection with Flores Avenue)
[Brady Cherry
CC 04/27/99 000004
Page 3 of 8
ITEM NUMBER: A= 1
DATE: 05/11/99
6. 2-Hour Parking`Zone -El Camino Real from Century Plaza to East Mall - Fiscal Impact:
$200.00 (Staff recommendation: Council adopt Resolution No. 1999-019 designating a
portion of El Camino Real as a 2-Hour Parking Zone) [Brady Cherry]
T Traffic Way / Route 101 Interchange PSR Consultant Services Agreement - Fiscal
Impact: $75,000 (Staff recommendation Council authorize the Mayor to enter.into an
agreement with Omni-Means, Ltd. To,prepare a Project Study Report for the Traffic Way
/Route 101 Interchange) [Brady Cherry]
Terrill Graham, 6205 Conejo Road pulled Item #A-7. Mayor Johnson pulled Item #A-4.
Council Member Luna pulled Item#A-5. Eric Greening, 6600 Lewis Avenue,pulled Item#A-1.
MOTION: By Council Member Lerno and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Arrambide to approve Items #A-2,3, and 6.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
Item #A-1: Eric Greening, 6600 Lewis Avenue, requested that under the Community Forum he
would like to substitute"environmental determination." on line two for "opinion."
MOTION: By Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide and seconded by Council Member
Clay to approve Item#A4.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
Item #A-4: Mayor Johnson stated that in a letter received from the Community Church of
Atascadero, the church has asked that the Council consider a NO PARKING ZONE for only one
side of the street(see Attachment A).
PUBLIC COMMENT
Terrill Graham, 6205 Conejo Road, stated that the police do not enforce the no parking
elsewhere.
Rush Kolemaine, P.O. Box 1990, asked if the no parking could be scheduled for limited hours.
Mayor Johnson closed the Public Comment period
There was Council consensus to direct staff to review a partial parking solution and agreed to
continue the item.
CC 04/27/99 000005
Page 4 of 8
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 05/11/99
Item #A-5: Mayor Johnson asked Community Services Director Brady Cherry for clarification
on the item. Mr. Cheny gave a brief staff report.
Council Member Luna stated that he believed that there should not be any stop sign on Los Gatos
and Council Member lay agreed.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Daphne Fahsing, 5105 Llano Road, stated she was opposed to the addition of a stop sign on Los
Gatos. She also suggested removing the existing stop sign on Los Gatos Road (see Attachment
B).
Stubbie Fasig, 7555 Portola Road, prepared statement read by Ms. Fahsing, expressed her
opposition of the stop igns on Los Gatos Road. She also requested that the Council concentrate
on making repairs to city roads, specifically Portola Road (see Attachment Q.
Mayor Johnson closed the Public Comment period.
There was Council consensus that they could not support the recommendation of staff and the
Council agreed to direct staff to review the existing stop sign on Los Gatos Road
Item #A-7: Council Member Clay stepped down on this item due to a conflict of interest.
Assistant City Engineer John Neil gave a brief staff report and answered questions of Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Rush Kolemaine, P.O. Box 1990, stated that he agreed with Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide that the
Council needed more public input on this issue.
Eric Greening, 6600 Lewis Ave., stated that he was concerned with receiving only one bid. He
also stated that he would like to see more alternatives for this project.
Terrill Graham, 6205 Conejo Road, stated that he agreed with the previous speakers. He
suggested the creation of a public committee to gain public input:
Mayor Johnson closed the Public Comment period
Mayor Johnson voiced concern for the reception of only one bid.
Mayor Pro Tem Arrarnbide stated that he feels this interchange needs to be studied.
Mayor Pro Tem Arra 'bide made a motion to approve Item#A-7 including the $2,800 option.
The motion failed due to the lack of a second.
CC 04/27/99 ` 0
Page 5 of 8
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 05/11/99
MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Arrambide to approve Item#A-7 not including any of the options.
Motion passed 4:0 by a roll-call vote. (Clay abstained)
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None
C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS:
1. Paloma Creek Park Food Concessionaire Agreement Fiscal Impact. $1,500-2,000 in
revenue per year (Staff recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to execute
an agreement with Karen Estrada of Atascadero, to operate a concession stand a Paloma
Creek Park) [Brady Cherry]
Community Services Director Brady Cherry gave a brief staff report and answered questions of
Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT: None
MOTION: By Council Member Clay and seconded by Council Member Luna to
approve Item#C-1.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
2. Amendment to Contract between the City of Atascadero and the California Public
Employees' Retirement S sY tem'- Fiscal Impact: None (Staff recommendation: 1.
Council adopt Resolution No. 1999-024, giving Notice of Intention to amend the
Contract between the City Council of the City of Atascadero and the Board of
Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System, and 2. Council
adopt Ordinance No. 358, on first reading by title only, authorizing the Mayor to execute
an amendment to the contract between the City Council of the City of Atascadero and the
Board of Administration of the California Public Employees'Retirement System) [Wade
McKinney]
City Manager Wade McKinney gave a brief staff report and answered questions of Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT: None
MOTION: By Council Member Lerno and seconded by Council Member Clay to
approve Item#C-2.
Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. ,
CC 04/27/99 000007
Page 6 of 8
ITEM NUMBER: A- 1
DATE: 05/11/99
3. Road Abandonment #99001 - Portion of San Gabriel Road (Larsen Family Trust)
FiscalImpact: None (Staff recommendation: Council adopt Resolution No. 1999-022
approving abandonment of a portion of San Gabriel Road, RA 499001) [Paul Saldana]
Community and Economic Development Director Paul Saldana gave the staff report and
answered questions of Council.
PUBLIC COMMEN
Eric Greening, 6600 Lewis Ave., asked what the mitigation would be for the 37 oak trees that
will be removed upon he creation of this road.
Mayor Johnson closed the Public Comment period.
Council Member Clay asked Mr. Saldana to comment on Mr. Greening's question. Mr. Saldana
said that a tree conservation easement has been conditioned by the Planning Commission.
MOTION: 13y Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Lerno to
pprove Item #C-3.
otion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote.
4. Information Bulletin
Mayor Pro Tem Affambide requested that the Parks and Recreation Commission also provide a
timeline for their goal
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS
S.L.O. Council of Governments/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authorit
Mayor Johnson stated hat the committee meets next week.
Air Pollution Control District
Mayor Pro Tem announced that they discussed the use of natural gas for the buses at Hearst
Castle.
Count Mayor's Roun Table
Mayor Johnson reported that they will meet Tuesday, May 4 , 1999.
Economic Vitalily Corporation, Board of Directors
Mayor Johnson stated hey will meet on Wednesday, April 28, 1999.
CC 04/27/99 000008
Page 7 of 8
ITEM NUMBER: A 1
DATE: 05/11/99
E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION:
City Treasurer
David Graham explained the issue of the delegation of responsibility of investment of the City's
funds. He also apologized for not being able to get out the City Treasurer's reports due to the
City's current computer problems.
F. ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Session at 9:05 p.m. to the next Regular Session
scheduled on May 11, 1999.
MEETING RECORDED BY:
Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk
MEETING MINUTES PREPARED BY:
Melanie Whaley,Deputy City Clerk
Attachments: Attachment A— Prepared statement by Larry G. Anderson,
Community Church of Atascadero
Attachment B— Prepared statement by Daphne Fahsing
Attachment C Prepared statement by"Stubbie"Fasig
CC 04/27/99
Page 8 of 8
Attachriient. A'
. A.tascadero-City Council
�uRe a t 'M'eeting Date:4!27/99
i :,. - - -• i .TIDEONIlJ[[T1NTiTY•CiURCH OF ATASCADER•
Founded 1915 a Urt}xed C.Jzurch oj�'Christ
-5850 RosariaAve..• At scaaero,CA934.22.- {8d5j:466-910$.'
h •
, ••+ • • , ' • -• a •..e, �f.• • . tre
•
April 22:1939 .
• moi'. . .. i. :�% i ♦ . -� .•.
.:.:.a....•r.—..-s.:rrt.:._.ws++_r,.s. f .ur. :,.a.?...,>.'•' •mss :F.b-ss mca*.as A• -:41. .1 s+... -'• s L ., '• .:+....
• �r�j_.faun ; �" � t =.....r...'R�.,:.�..:,>,��� +;..__, - ,
' til,/^tis�: t?:1 � r,•"•�•o;r�;- t;i,ia 'l—*•n3. L_iTP: r �''.1.,19CnS... '' __' ' r!1?�"�:
'"City bf Ala dery ,: • . , t. ,._ :,
• , . 6500 Palm, Avenue •. ` ., ' • • �` •, i
• '
oAtasca
dero,CA 93422 . . . ' ,. - • . ', r : _ . .
'` ',. -, • _ "� ;. `. •. ,,,•• .•.sem:
Dear City ouncil Members;• :: ,r,
• The
Churd i Cbuncli af .Conuftnity,Church'of Atascadero discussed.Resalution t
No. '9999 21•at.thelr meeting on April 20,;1999..••The Members;orf the.Ca ric i[•
' expressed ricem thatthe proposed NO PARKINGZONE'on Palma Avenue would •:
• ' ,:,z create a addng hardship,for our members and•:gogaii.at a nurnber'.of high-•
• atten acs events. ,
The Council voted to request that.parking be allowed on one.side•%of Palma Avenue. :
• • ' This.acro mvdatiorf woyld.allow the parking.fiecessary for'our facTtfles•�to cohlinue
•
asp place` o Meet Me SPJdtlal and related-fieeds cf our community.
. - ••, ' "�Sincerely,
A-z
• rte,'. ••• • • .. jf i l
JL
Lairr
y on
�COmm' unky Church of Atascadero. '.
' Attachment: B
Atascadero City Council
Meeting Date: 4/27/99
Daphne Fahsing, 5105 Llano Rd.
City Council meeting April 27,1999
Item: ConsentAgenda` -A5
I was surprised to see this item on the consent agenda when
I checked at -the library, as I think I should have received
a notice. Way back last July I sent a request that the stop
sign at the intersection of Los Gatos and Flores be removed.,
as it is unnecessary.
At a meeting of the Traffic Committee on Sept. 16 last year,
the entire committee agreed that this sign was not needed,
and I tried to make it very clear that an additional sign
would only cause more frustration.
I doubt if anybody checked on how many cars come out of the
Flores/Los Gatos intersection in one day? I have travelled
that road almost . every day for years, and I think I .can .
safely- y say that-,.I can count on the fingers of one hand the
number of cars I have had -to stop for.
Rather than being safer, an additional sign on Los Gatos
would cause more confusion, waste more gas and cause more
pollution.
The present stop sign on Flores gives a clear view of on
coming traffic on the thru street, Los Gatos. Likewise,
there is a clear view of any cars- at the stop sign on Flores
from either direction on Los Gatos.
Therefore, I again ask that the current stop sign on Los
Gatos be removed so as to provide an unobstructed drive .on
the. thru street, and not to add an additional stop sign.
Attachment: C
Atascadero City Council
Meeting Date: 4/27/99
"Stubbie" Fasig 7555 Portola Road
City. Council Meeting 27 'April 1999
Item: Consent Agenda A5.
Since I am unable to attend the council meeting this evening- I
am asking Daphne Fahsing to read this statement- for me.
Daphne Fahsing nd I were at the Traffic Committee .meeting on
16 September 1998. We both drive .on Los Gatos Road and find the
Stop Sign on Los Gatos Road at. the intersection with Flores Road
as completely UITNECESSARY.
Vehicles on Flores and on Los Gatos are plainly. visible to . each
other at the in ersection. Please do not contribute to the con-
fusion and annoyance to the public by placing another' Stop Sign
on Los Gatos Road. ' Instead, remove the existing. sign on Los Gatos
at. the interchange..'-_
Please 'do not treat our requests lightly, give .them serious consid-
eration.
If the council is REALLY interested is SAFETY it would concentrate
on making repairs to .the -city roads, Portola Road in particular.
Sincerely,:,.„,
M. S. ASIG
ITEM NUMBER: A - 2
DATE: 05/11/99
ieis ® 1979
CADF,��,
City Manager's Agenda Report
Wade G. McKinney
Atascadero Mall Overlay Project
RECOMMENDATION:
Council authorize the Mayor to execute an agreement with A.J. Diani Construction Company,
Inc. to construct the Atascadero Mall Overlay Project at a maximum cost of$144,932 and make
the necessary appropriations.
DISCUSSION:
Design of the Atascadero Mall Overlay Project improvements have been completed. Bids were
received and publicly opened on April 22, 1999. Consistent with City procurement policies,the
award of the contract requires Council approval.
A bid summary prepared by the City Clerk and an itemized bid summary are included in this
ireport for reference. The low bid was submitted by A.J. Diani Construction Company, Inc. in
the amount of$107,356.00.
The bids have been checked for completeness and accuracy. Staff finds A.J. Diani Construction
Company, Inc. to be the lowest responsible bidder.
FISCAL IMPACT:
PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Construction $107,356
Contingencies @ 10% .$10,736
Plans,Specifications and Estimates @ $10,736
10%
City Support Services (Funding
Applications, Staff Reports,Inquires, $5,368
Agency Coordination) @ 5%
Construction Engineering(Inspection,
Contract Administration,Survey, Soils $10,736
Testing) @ 10%°
TOTAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES $144,932
00+0033
ITEM NUMBER: A =2
DATE: 05/11/99
PROJECT REVENUES
Fund 500, Urban State Highway Account Funds $139,000
Fund 306, Sidewalk Trust Funds $8,500
TOTAL PROJECT REVENUES $147,500
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Award contract
2. Do not Award Contract- improvements will not be constructed. The roadway deterioration
and drainage problems will not be corrected. The extent of the present damage will be
increased by daily vehicle traffic and future rains,which will necessitate a more expensive
rehabilitation.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A-Bid Summary
Attachment B - Itemized Bid Summary
i
000014
Cie o Atascader' o
Office of the City .Clerk
BID SUMMARY
TO: Brady Cherry, Community Services Director
FROM: Marcia McClure Torgerson,City Clerk
BID NO.: 99-01
OPENED 04/22/99 2:00 p.m. .
PROJECT: Atasca' ero Mall Overlay Project
(3) bids were received and opened today, as follows:
Bidder Base Bid
Madonna Constructior Co. $130,742.20
P.O. Box 3910
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403
Granite construction Co. $124,704.00
P.O. Box 50085
Watsonville, CA 950 7-5085
A.J. Diani Construction Co.,Inc. $107,356.00
295 North Blosser Road
Santa Maria, CA 93458-4217
Attachments: 3 bids
APPENDIX A
r O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O m
O ,� CM W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N O O O O O N
O U O O O O O O O O O O C; C'1 to O O O CM tci to +t v t0 N I--
r O Q O O O N O O. O O, o O O O N O O O t0 N N t� N 00
N W U U J O O O r- N O LO O M O LO O r r 0 00 1 N N r N t0 Z
N00 (D 9 O CNM LO Cl) er r N O r a- C6 N � r r O (1!
CL
M
CL d c O
¢ 0 �jMO
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 O o 0 o O o
w c XX N w ooOO0000OoOOO000coLf) � coLO0 Q
O A O t7 r-4� Lo O 6 io 0 0 A to C:j C7 C:j 0 CV O O Cr; CV
F- om J W O O V V r r 0 N O LO O N 0 0 0
Z '..
¢ O O O O r N O O It N
m cO O 'C^ Z O M CV r r
m 0
p U O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0�0 O co'V
Ln - Lo v tci Oo A O O t6 O tri Oo ori O O O to CO � to to I- co Z r�
Lc)
h r ti r- O M r 0 V r- N r 0 0 O O w O N V N 00 O
o J W � M � tO 0) M M O CC) CO � N r Cr) CD Cl) N N N CO N t`
U Qoo FQ- N to C7 d r CV r s} N Ch r r r Cn
s N
U) C)
C O
O LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O
U X .; W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O tO M O O O
O C U 0 v M 0 N r- 0 0 0 0 M O v 6 06 4 O N O O M N
C13 O d co � N O M N r `Md' r M O M
CLC Q Z N d r r
0 a D
v 000tO000tOotO0000000O000 �n 0
d C co V O O O ti O O O O N O O O O O O N O t0 r 0 et O
Zr N O 4 O O sl' M �l r O OC) O t0 O N M to N �- C] N c6
.- a O O t` M O t- co 0) CA 0 00 � M to r c0 N r t` I r O
co -1N O O O O V M v W) M 00 N 00 CA 'V' N M r N 00 CO
Q M H M O C Ch N Na r r N v r r h
z 0
U) co U or)
w w UCC) 0 0 0 LO 0 0 o O o O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0
Z < XO W w O O O N N 00 n O N o 00 0 0 ow O f` O t`
V.: CV
Ur CA M 4 CV t C) O C) O CCto 06 to cw O CV O 6 vi NCmdNSM rV N0) rMN NN r7 r
W N Co j M Cn N Z
N Q Q p Co Q QQ QQ Q Q Q �
0 m to Cn z z z z Q LL W LLf W W (Ij W LL_ LL LL LL. LL LL
J J J J J J co O
U 0
0
LO Z r r �N V 00 O0 r 0 O O CO r N N Cl 'V' � � LO 0 � V d
O ? r CM N r r r N CO
z a 0
a� O
a` °'
a�
O
m Oo
a� oc o
U c 0 (.j a C13w
04
_ v o 0 > B: - o U "m 6n
¢ > N a fn o >O 0 ` o U o CL
.J°. o to cn `' to
v c 6 3 3 ° Q
p mCQ
CL -0 UZa0 `c 3t � U F m
a) 0) m a� t_ m C6 X 5 m ¢ o p N
O CL CL>+ >+ m mY rnp Em "vaoNNi°ad CC
N
Z t`C m y o U y ° m N � 0 0 3
O_ - U U CC C U ¢ N 8L X 7 ~ °c — N N N N o W
C o m O C co
CO -IL C C7f O O ,o C6 C1 0-
z
Q Q N v
z U U 4% m U C N m d C2 o o Cn .�. '� b .: C N z
0 ° = = `� moo = acv c N2 rnmcnmm m c
o narna € a > CC c 8 m M .LIE � FE � > C7
LL w � ¢ QQ <0U)) W � 0It < CL = F`- Fl= d LLj o
W 0 c0 r co� O � � � � � � f0 r, w W O N O
F— N N N Z
000016
I
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: .05/11/99
11011 Kimn
1918
1919 8
CADS
City Manager's Agenda Report
Wade G. McKinney
General Plan Amendment 99002
Urban Services Line Extension
905 El Camino Real (Gearhart/Cannon Associates)
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission recommends Council adopt Resolution 1999-026 approving an extension
of the Urban Services Line.
DISCUSSION:
Back round: On March 16, 1999, the Planning Commission approved a Master Plan of
Development for the subject property consisting of approximately 239,600 square feet of
commercial retail development.
Condition 51 of Resolution 1999-011 approving the Master Plan of Development requires the
applicant to "secure a General Plan Amendment extending the Urban Services Line for the use of
City services".
City Council Resolution 26-95 establishes April 1 and October 1 as the deadline for private
persons to submit applications for General Plan Amendments. Processing of such applications is
made after the April l deadline, therefore, the General Plan Amendment could not be considered
as part of the Master Plan of Development, since the application was submitted prior to this
deadline.
Analysis
1. General Plan Requirements. The Urban Services Line (USL) is defined in the Land Use
Element (LUE) of the General Plan as "the maximum area that may be served by the sewerage
system". The priority for the provision of sewer service, according to the LUE is:
Areas Not Requiring Amendment of the General Plan;
1. Cease and desist areas, and other septic problem areas within the Urban Service
Line.
2. Other areas within the Urban Services Line
000017
ITEM NUMBER: C 1
DATE: 05/11/99
3. Cease and desist areas beyond the Urban Services Line
Areas Requirin-General Plan Amendment:
4. Other areas beyond the Urban Service Line requiring a more intensive General
Plan map land use designation provided that the following findings can be made:
a. Extension of sewer service to the area will not overburden the city's sewer
plant or collection system.
b.' Extension of sewer service to the area will not affect service to priority
areas 1 through 3. 1
In order to approve an extension to the USL, the Planning Commission and City Council is
required to make the findings listed in item 4 above. The rational for these finds is further'
explained in this analysis.
The General Plan also requires that "new development should pay its share of the costs of
providing all capital facilities needed to support it; payment may be in the form of actual
construction of facilities where appropriate as conditions of approval and/or by the payment of
fees, among other possibilities". z It is this policy that authorizes the City to ensure that the
proposed development pays its share of capital facilities as a result of the project.
2. Extension will not overburden collection system or impact other priority areas. The
project, as proposed in the Master Plan of Development,:will generate an.estimated 2,050 gallons
per day (G.P.D) at buildout. Based upon average yearly flow, the treatment.facility has 220,000
G.P.D. remaining on its treatment permit. It is estimated that approximately 490 single family
residences are located within the USL that can gravity flow into the existing collection system
but which do not currently have sewer available. The estimated demand is approximately117,600
G.P.D. In addition, the City Council recently approved an USL extension to allow the "Lakes"
project to connect to the sewer, with an ultimate build out demand of approximately 29,000 .
G.P.D. Therefore, if all these connections were made, including the proposed project,
approximately 73,400 G.P.D. would remain under the City's current operating permit.
This also does not consider planned improvements to the treatment system that would increase
the capacity of the plant. Development fees associated with this and other projects can only be
used for such expansion purposes. The City has planned an expansion that would increase the
operating capacity to 2.09 M.G.P.D. Therefore, based on the current capacity and planned
improvements to the plant, there will be no adverse impact on the facility nor other priority areas
contained in the LUE.
The applicant will be required to construct all collection systems and make necessary
improvements to the City's existing collection system to handle the anticipated flows. These
improvements would include gravity and/or pressured lines, lift station(s), tie-in and other
improvements.
'Land Use Element,page II-21
'Fiscal Element Policy C-1,page IX-3 000018
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 05/11/99
3. Planning Co mission Action: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the
proposed USL extension on April 20, 1999. Following the public hearing, the Commission
voted 5-1-1 to recommend approval of the USL extension.
Environmental Review: A Mitigated Negative Declaration was approved by the Commission on
March 16, 1999. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was based on a Supplemental EIR which
identified the following environmental impacts associated with the construction of an on-site
sewage collection,treatment and disposal system:
• degradation of groundwater quality in the immediate vicinity of the percolation
ponds;
• odor nuisance associated with sewage handling;
• visual impact of highly organic disposal ponds which frequently support much
algae growth; and
• Increased energy usage associated with treatment and pumping of sewage
above existing po er consumption level.
For waste discharge r quirements, the proposed septic system will have to be approved by the
Regional Water Quality Control Board. There is no guarantee that the Board will approve a
septic system discharge for a commercial project. Connecting to the City sewer system presents
an environmentally superior alternative than on site treatment. There are a number of options
being evaluated for serving the proposed site, via Traffic Way or extending the El Camino Real
service.
Conclusion: The proposed extension of the USL meets the requirements of the Land Use
Element and Fiscal Element of the General Plan and is an environmentally sound alternative to
on-site disposal system. There are no known negative impacts to the city's sewer or treatment
collection system.
FISCAL IMPAC
The extension of the s wer service will result in additional revenue to the wastewater treatment
fund. Costs of extend ng the service and expansion of the collection will be paid for at the time
of development.
ALTERNATIVE
Deny General Plan Amendment request. This alternative is not recommended as sewer service
was identified'as the environmental superior alternative and there is no guarantee that the Water
Quality Control Board will approve an on-site facility.
RESPONSIBLE EPARTMENT: Community Development
000019
ITEM NUMBER: C - 1
DATE: 05/11/99
ATTACHMENTS: A. PlanningCommission Resolution 1999-017
B. Planning Commission Minutes April 20, 1999
C. City Council Resolution 1999-026
000020
Attachment "N'
RESOLUTION 1999-017. _-__—_- __-------
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISION OF THE CITY
OF ATASCADE O RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND
THE GENERAL PLAN:URBAN SERVICES LINE
WHEREASthe City of Atascadero has received an application to extend the
Urban Services Lie of the General Plan for the purpose of providing sewer service to
property generally located at 905 El Camino Real as depicted in Exhibit "A', attached
hereto and made a part of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and
public notice of environmental documents, as set forth in the local guidelines
implementing the California Environmental Quality Act,have been adhered to; and.
WHEREAS a timely and properly noticed public hearing upon General Plan.
Amendment No. 9 002 was held by the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero
on April 20, 1999 at which hearing evidence, oral and documentary, was admitted on
behalf of said amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning.Commission of the
City of Atascadero' in a regular session assembled on April 20, 1999 recommends that
the City Council approve General Plan Amendment No. 99002 based on the findings and
conditions as outh d in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be delivered
forthwith by
the Planning Commission Secretary to the City Council of the City of Atascadero.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 20th DAY OF APRIL 1999.
Harold L. Carden,III
Chairperson
Attest:
Paul M. Saldana
Community Devel pment Director
000021
LAND USE M� ' ,
General Plan Amendment#990027
905 El Camino •
oi PC #1999-0111IRM
�t
.. s
_ s
Findings and Conditions of Annroval
General Plan Amendment 99002
Extension of Urban Services Line
Exhibit"B"Resolution 1999-017
905 El Camino Real
F"indines of roval:
1. Extension of sewer service to the area will not overburden the City's sewer plan or
collections em.
2. Extension of sewer service to the area will.notaffect service to priority areas as identified
in the Genera.Plan Land Use Element.
Conditions of al•
1_ The. applicant shalt. submit sever improvement plans prepared by a registered civil
engineer for review and approval by the City Engineer and the Chief of Wastewater
Operations p 'or to recordation of the final map. Sewer improvement plans shall conform
to the require eats of the City Standard Specifications.
2_ Priorto issuance of the first buil,ding-permit, the applicant shalldemonstrate that the
portions of th existing wastewater collection system required to convey sewage from the
project.site Pump Station#5 have adequate capacity_ The sewage flow used in the
capacity calc ilations shall be the flow from all area within the existing Urban Services
Line at buil out plus the flow generated by the project. If the existing wastewater
collection s em does not have adequate capacity to adequately convey the sewage flow
at.build-out I ilus.the flow from the project site, theapplicant shall design and construct
improvement; to the existing wastewater collection system as required by the City
Engineer and. the. Chief of. Wastewater Operations. Plans for improving the existing
wastewater llection system shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and
submitted.for review and approval.by the City Engineer and the Chief of Wastewater
Operations. Improvements to the- existing wastewater collection system shall I be
completed pr or to the final inspection of the first building constructed on the site.
3. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City to pay a pro-rata share for the
design and construction.of upgrades.to Pump Station#5 prior to the issuance of the first.
building pem at. The form and content of the agreement shall be reviewed and approved
by the City Attorney and the City Engineer. The upgrades shall be designed to
accommodate existing wet weather flows plus the increased flow generated by the
project.The.applicant's pro-rata share shallbe based onthe anticipated average daily.dry
weather flow generated by the project divided by the existing average daily dry weather
flow to Pump Station#5.
4. The.applicam.shall.acquire title or interest in.any offsite land that may be required to
allow constn ction of the sewer improvements required by these conditions of approval.,
The applishall bear all costs associated with the acquisitions. The applicant shall
Page 1 of 2
000023
gain concurrence from all adjacent property owners whose ingress or egress is affected
by construction of the improvements required by these conditions of approval.
5. The applicant shall enter into a Plan Check/Inspection Agreement with the City and shall
pay all.outstanding fees prior.to issuance of a Certificate of Compliance.
6. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit prior to commencing any work within
existing rights of way.
7. All improvements shall in the public right of way shall be secured with a 100%
performance guarantee and a 50%labor and materials guarantee until the improvements
are accepted as substantially complete by the City Engineer_ Prior to the final inspection
of the improvements, and before the other guarantees are released, a 10% maintenance
guarantee shall be posted to cover the improvements for a period of one(1)year from the
date of final inspection. The guarantee amounts shall be based on an engineers estimate
submitted by the project.engineer and approved by the City Engineer. The estimate shall
be based on City standard unit prices. The City Attorney shall approve the form of
guarantee-
8. The.applicant shall submit.a.written.statement from.a registered civil engineer certifying
that all work shown on the plans has been completed and is in full compliance with the'
plans approved. by the City and the Uniform Building_ Code(s) prior to the final
inspection.
9. A Mylar copy and a. blue line print. of as:built improvement plans, signed by the
registered engineer who prepared the plans shall be provided to the City Engineer prior to
the final inspection.
10. The applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities.
11. The applicant shall pay all sewer annexation fees prior to the issuance of a construction
permit for the public improvements.
12. The applicant shall pay for all costs associated with the establishment of a reimbursement
agreement or assessment district, if applicable, including, but not limited to preparation
of studies,maps,and recordation of documents.
13. No other properties shall.be served by sewer service constructed by applicant without `
having been added to the Urban Services Line by a General Plan Amendment.
Page 2 of 2
'000024
Planning Commission Meeting—April 20, 1999
Page 7 of 10
ttachment "B" Building, Engineering, and Police. Staff is awaiting
wire going through the CEQA process. The project is a
John Falkenstecorre 'ted a statement he made on behalf of the applicant, Kelly Gearhart: Mr.
Gearhart has no p ble eliminating the driveway as requested in condition_ #12 (not eliminating
condition#12).
Commissioner Eddin.R3 ked for an overhead to show -elevations of the buildings. He
complimented the attractive esign of the car lot.
Commissioner Fonzi asked Mr. arcing preference — Sparling would like abandonment and
give Gearhart access
Commissioner Fonzi asked that condit #12 remain, however asked Mr. Sparling what he
preferred.
Mr. Sparlin stated his preference was for ab an nment there and Mr. Gearhart given access to
all the property along '...here the frontage road is c ently located.
ACTION: Moved by Commissioner Eddings an seconded by Commissioner Clark to
approve Conditional Use Permit 99002 adopting Resolution No. PC 1999-
016 eli inating conditions #9, #11 (bo #12 and #13 and accepting
conditi n #10, not alternate #10'.and finding a project categorically exempt
from C QA.
AYES: Commissioners Bentz, Carden, Clark,Eddings, and nzi
NOES: Commissioner Zimmerman
ABSENT: Commissioner Jeanes
MOTION PASSED: -1-1
Chairman called for a 10 minute break, reconvening at 9:00-p.m.
6. General Plan Amendment 99002—905 E1 Camino Real
(Gearhart/Cain non Associates)
A General Plaa Amendment to include property in the Urban Service Line for the
purpose of pr viding sewer services. Environmental determination: A Mitigated
Negative Declaration for the Master Plan was adopted on March 16, 1999. (Staff
recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. PC1999-017.)
Paul Saldana' Community Development Director, delivered a brief staff report and
answered questions presented by Commissioners.
Commissioner Eddings asked for the route of the extension, along Traffic Way or El
Camino Real, md if it will be gravity or pressure lines. Will it be possible for other
people to connect to the line with the gravity flow system. Mr. Saldana stated,Traffic
Way which is the more expensive alternative.
0000.25
Planning Commission Meeting April 20, 1999
Page 8 of 10
TESTIMONY:
John Falkenstien, Cannon Associates questioned condition#5. Mr. Saldaiia changed compliance
to completion.
Rush Kolemaine,P O Box 1990, commented:;
• Problem with quality of drafting on visual
• Why extension of USL extended beyond RR tracks to low area
• At what point and time do any of the properties SW of the subject property tie into those
lines?
Eric Greening, 6600 Lewis Avenue
• Agrees with extension of USL beyond tracks
• Questions with sewage treatment—operation of plant
• Question regarding strip vs. nodes with 2 developments on each end of town
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commissioner Carden asked Mr. Saldana for definition of the boundary of the extension. -Mr.
Saldana replied that the extension would not include properties along El Camino Real or Santa
Cruz Road, only project property.
CommissionerCarden asked if a renbursement policy is in place for connecting to the USL Mr.
Saldana replied that there is a policy.
Commissioner Fonzie
• Asked for reclassification of the boundaries.
Commisisoner Eddinas
• Why can't pressurized line be tied into by future projects?
John Niel. En 'neering
• It would require a series of check valves—not standard practice.
Commissioner Fonzi
• Any septic failure in the area? Mobile home park?
Paul Saldana
• Not in this area, further down ECR by Factory Outlet
Commissioner Clark
• Lakes ties into sewer it seems like gravity feed is only way.
Likes gravity rather than pressure to enable future applicants to tie in.
Commissioner Zimmerman
0 City Council asked for sewer studies.
0 This is a discriminatory action. JOO
Planning Commission Meeting—April 20, 1999
Page 9 of 10
• Average yearly flo what happens when you have way above average yearly flow?
• Do we truly have the capacity to handle the total load.
• We've been asking lbr, 3 years for a sewer study.
Commissioner Fonzi
• Are the boundaries 'long El Camino Real or is this a noncontiguous property?
• Likes the idea of noncontiguous
Chairman Carden
• Asked staff if this was one of the options? Staff responded yes.
• If sewer runs by a property, most residences will not hook up and will fight not to hook up
due to the expense.
Paul Saldana
• Policy is if in USL.and septic system fails you have to hookup to sewer if sewer is available.
• When system is des gned, design will be such that ultimate hookup will be to that system
Commissioner Clark
• Will Commission g t to review which route is proposed?
• Is there an advantag' to pressure vs. gravity?
• Expense was prohibitive glad not required to tie in- option is nice
Paul Saldafta
• No specific requirement or policy for Planning commission to review final.sewer system.
• Ideally if design is ECR or Traffic Way, design should be for highest and best use.
John Neil. Engineering
• looking at preferr is gravity this site is pressure because it is uphill pump station #5 will
be upgraded. There may be other improvements
ACTION: Moved y Chairman Carden and seconded by Commissioner Eddings to
adopt Resolution PC 1999-017 recommending and extension of the Urban
Services Line.
AYES: Commissioners Bentz, Carden, Clark,Eddings, and Fonzi
NOES: Commh sioner Zimmerman
ABSENT: Commi sioner Jeanes
MOTION PASSED: -1-1
ANNOUNCEMENTS & REPORTS
7. Planning Staff Reports.
a. Tentative Parcel Map 98010—5190 Aguila Road
(Grenville.Jones)
00002'
Attachment foci#
RESOLUTION 1999-026
A-RESOLUTION-OF THE.CrrY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ATASCADERO RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND
TBE..GENERAI._PLAN IRBAN SERVICES LINE
WHEREAS, the City of Atascadero has received an application to extend the
Urban_Services_Line.of the Geneeral.Plan_for_the-purpose_of providing sewer service to
property generally located at 905 El Camino Real as depicted in Exhibit "A", attached
hereto and made a part-of this Resolution as though hilly set forth herein;and
WHEREAS, the laws and regulations relating to the preparation and
public notice of environmental documents,.. as set forth in the local guidelines
implementing the California Environmental Quality Act,have been adhered to;and
WHEREAS,on_April_20, 1999,the.Planning_Commission held a public hearing
and after hearing testimony,.took action to recommend approval of the amendment;and
WHEREAS,._a timely. and properly noticed public..hearing upon General Plan
Amendment No. 99002 was held by the City Council of the City of Atascadero on May
11, 1999 at which hearing..evidence,..oral and documentary,..was admitted on behalf of
said amendment.
NOW,.THEREFORE, BE.TT RESOLVED that the, City Council of the City of
Atascadero, in a regular session assembled on May 11, 1999 recommends that the City
Council. approve General Plan Amendment No. 99002. based on the findings and
conditions as outlined in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part of this Resohrtion.
PASSER AND ADOPTEDT—MS.11"DAY OF MAY 1999.
Ray Johnson
Mayor
Attest:
Marcia Torgerson
City Clerk
000028
ATTACHMENT A
LAND USE MAP
General Plan Amendment . rrll
905 El Camino Real
Exhibit
Resolution 999
GENERAL11 • • • r •
• • r ••• • •
PROPOSEJ • H
1b.
Pei
� � s
findings and Conditions of Approval
GenerAPian Amendment 99002
Extension of Urban Services Line -
Exbibit,"B"Resolution 1999-026
905 El Camino Real
findings of Approval•
1. Extension of sewer service to the area will not overburden the City's sewer plan or
collection system.
2- Extension ofsewer_servieeto.the area.mrdriot.affect..servicetopriority areas as identified
in the General Plan Land Use Element.
Conditions of Approval:
L. The. applicant. shall submit_ sewer improvement .plans.prepared by a registered civil
engineer for review and approval by the City Engineer and the Chief of Wastewater
Operations prior.to recordation-of the final map_ Sewer improvement plans sball conform
to the requirements of the City Standard Specifications.
2... Prior to.issuance of the first building-perniks the.applicant shall demonstrate that the
portions of the existing wastewater collection system required to convey sewage from the
project site to Pump Station#5 have.adequate opacity...,The sewage flow used in the
capacity calculations shall be the flow from all areas within the existing Urban Services
Line at_build-out-plus the flow generated by the,project._ If the existing wastewater
collection system does not have adequate capacity to adequately convey the sewage flow
at build-out plus the.flow from the project site,the.applicant shall design and construct
improvements to the existing wastewater collection system as required by the City
Engineer and.the.Chief of Wastewater Operations__ Plans.for improving the existing
wastewater collection system shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and
submitted.for review and approval by the City Engineer and the Chief of Wastewater
Operations. Improvements to the existing wastewater collection system shall be
completed prior to the final inspection.of the first building constructed on the site.
3. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City to pay a pro-rata share for the
design and_construction of upgrades to.Pump Static#5 prior to the issuance of the fust
building permit. The form and content of the agreement shall be reviewed and approved
by the_City Attorney and the City Engineer.._ The. upgrades shall be designed to
accommodate existing wet weather flows plus the increased flow generated by the
project.The.applicant%.pro-rata share shaff be based.ou the anticipated average daily dry
weather flow generated by the project divided by the existing average daily dry weather
flow to Pump Station#5.
4... The..applicant;shalt acquire title.or merest in any offsite lander that may be required to
allow construction of the sewer improvements required by these conditions of approval.
The applicant shall bear all costs associated with the acquisitions. The applicant shall
Page-1 of-2 . . .
000030
gain conctmence from all ac jacem property owners whose ingress or egress is affected
by on of the improvements required by these conditions of approval.
5. The applicar t shall enter into a Plan Checldhispection.Agreement with the City and shall
pay all.o fees prior.to issuance of a Certificate of Completion.
6. The applicar t shall obtain an encroachment.permit prior to commencing any work within
existing rigbts of may.
7. All improvenients shall m the public right of way shall be secured with a 100%
performance guarantee and a 501/6 labor and materials guarantee until the improvements
are accepted,as substantially complete by the City_.Engineer.. Prior to the final inspection
of the impr4 vements, and before the other guarantees are released, a 10% maintenance
guarantee st all be posted to cover the improvements for a period of one(1)year from the
date of finalinspection. The guarantee amounts shall be based on an engineer's estimate
submitted.by.the project engineer.and approved by the City Engineer. The estimate shall
be based on, City standard unit prices. The City Attorney shall approve the form of
guarantee.
a.. Tbe.aippli shall.submit&written statement from a_registered civil engineer certifying
that all wor shown on the plans has been completed and is in full compliance with the
plans. approved- by the City and the Uniform_Building.,Code(s) prior to the final
inspection.
9.. A.Mylar. CA ipy and a blue line. print of as-built improvement plans, signed by the
registered engineer who prepared the plans shall be provided to the City Engineer prior to
the final ittspection.
10. The applicatit shall be responsible for the relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities.
11. The apphcmt shall pay all sewer annexation fees prior to the issuance of a camstruction
permit.for the public improvements.
12. The applicat it shall pay for all costs associated with the establishment of a reimbursement
agreement or assessment district, if applicable,,including,,but not limited to preparation
of studies,maps,and recordation of documents.
13._ No_other erties shall be served by,sewer service constructed by applicant without
having been added to the Urban Services Line by a General Plan Amendment.
Page 2 oft
000031
ITEM NUMBER: C -2
DATE: 05111/99
n
i
Isis ® 19 e
City Manager's Agenda Report
Wade G. McKinney
Appeal of Planning Commission Approval
Tentative Parcel Map 98010(AT 98-104)
5190 Aguila Avenue
RECOMMENDATION:
Council conduct appeal hearing and direct staff to prepare appropriate resolutions.
DISCUSSION: .
Council Member George Luna filed an appeal
of the Planning Commission approval of
Tentative Tract Map 98010 (Attachment A).
The Planning Commission approved a tentative map, creating three parcels from one, on
April 6, 1999. Because there was some confusion about the conditions, the action was
clarified by the Commission on April 20, 1999. The Planning Commission, in approving
the project, approved an exception to the City standards for Aguila Avenue. City staff
had recommended denial of the Tentative Parcel Map, but provided alternatives for the
Commission's consideration. Copies of the staff analysis, minutes and action of the
Planning Commission are attached.
Pursuant to Section 9-1.111 of the Atascadero Municipal Code states, the "hearing body
may affirm, affirm in part, or reverse the action, decision or determination which is the
subject of the appeal, based upon findings of fact regarding the particular case."
Therefore, staff has provided all applicable information relating to the appeal, including
the staff reports and minutes of the planning commission meetings, the appeal and the
official action of the Commission.
The Applicant has agreed to pave Aguila Avenue should the Tentative Parcel Map be
approved. Aguila would be developed at its current width based on the following
reasons:
need for hillside grading.
1. Eliminate then g g
000032
ITEM NUMBER: C -2
DATE: 05/11/99
2. Eliminate tree removal.
3. Discourage regional or through traffic.
City staff had recommended the widening of Aguila Avenue along the property frontage,
up to 18' wide.where feasible,and,required turnouts where the width would not allow for
passing of cars. The applicant would be required to pave half the road, and provide an all-
weather surface over the remaining half:
FISCAL IMPACT:
Whether the Aguila Road frontage is improved to City standards or not, the City is not
expected to accept this road for public maintenance. The development of two additional
home sites is not expected to have a significant impact on the City's financial position.
Impact fees currently in place will offset some of the costs of expanding population, but
the net effect is expected to be slightly negative.
ALTERNATIVES:
I. The Council may reverse the decision of the Planning Commission and deny the
subdivision, if it finds that it is inconsistent with the General Plan or other City
ordinances or policies. The applicant would not be permitted to develop the parcel
further, and would not be required to make any additional improvements to the
street.
II. The Council may affirm the decision of the Planning Commission.
III. The Council may continue action if additional information is desired. Direction
should be given to staff and the applicants.
RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: Community Development
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A-- Letter of appeal from George Luna, dated April 10, 1999
Attachment B -- Planning Commission staff report for March 16
Attachment C— Planning Commission Resolution approving TPM 98010
Attachment D-- Minutes of April 6 Planning Commission meeting
Attachment E-_ Minutes of April 20 Planning Commission meeting
Attachment F -= Tentative Parcel Map
Attachment G-- Draft City Council resolutions (for approval and denial)
000033
ATTACHMENT A U
APR 19 KW
Councilman George Luna
P.D. Box 806 CITY OF ATASCA.DEER0 1
Atascadero, CA 93423 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
April 10, 1999
Marcia Torgerson
Atascadero City Clerk
With this letter I am appealing (Atascadero Municipal Coder 1-2.13 and 9-1.111)the
Planning Commis ion approval of Tentative Parcel Map 98010 (AT 98-104)at 5190
Aguila Avenue.
I am concerned th 3.t this project may receive approval without a full review by the City
Council. Any issu s involving roads and exceptions to city standards should have the
complete unbiased review of the Council as whole. The exception to the road
improvement stan iards is not recommended by the City Engineer and no finding was
made that the roac improvements on the property frontage be required to include asphalt
paving for the fullfrontage:.Absent a complete and thorough review of the facts to
support such an approval at the Planning Commission level, this issue needs further
illumination at the Council level before such an important issue is decided.
I am appealing so that these issues are preserved for full and complete evaluation by me
and the rest of the City Council. For that reason, my appeal includes all of the reasons
used by the planning staff in their report to recommend denial.
In addition, the a plication may not satisfy the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance,
viz. Sec. 11-5.00 (t), (s) and Sec. 93.154. Nor does it satisfy the General Plan which
states: Determina ion of appropriate lot sizes shall be based upon evaluation of such
factors.as slope, existence of a natural building site, availability of sewer service,
response time fo' emergency services, distance from the center of the community,
general character of the neighboring lands, percolation capability of the soil if proposed
for private sewage disposal systems, adequacy of access, and adequacy of building site.
Low density resi ntial areas are appropriate for areas within the Urban Service Line
where topography is relatively steep and where scenic or sensitive characteristics of the
land should be protected through lighter density urban residential designation. As a
matter of policy these potentially precedent setting issues need our full review and
attention.
Sincerely,
George Luna
000034
ATTACHMENT B
1 of 7
ITEM NUMBER:
lois ■ i9s DATE:•
Planning Commission Staff Report
Tentative Parcel Map 98010 (AT 98-104)
5190 Aguila Avenue
SUBJECT: Subdivision of one residential lot into three parcels,2.63, 1.56, and 1.51 acres
in area respectively, including an exception to the road improvement requirements to-allow a
narrower roadway than is normally required.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Resolution No. PC 1999-010, thereby denying approval of Tentative Parcel Map
98010,based on finding it inconsistent with the General Plan.
SITUATION AND FACTS:
1. Applicant: Grenville and Eileen Jones
2. Representative: John Falkenstien, Cannon Associates
3. Project Address: 5190 Aguila Avenue
4. General Plan Designation: Low-Density Single Family
5. Zoning District: RSF-Z (Residential Single Family, minimum lot size of 1.5 to
2.5 acres, depending on several physical factors)
6. Site Area: 5.70 acres
7. Existing Use: One residence exists in about the center of the site
8. Environmental Status: Negative Declaration with Mitigation posted February 16,
1999.
Site description: The site is a large,hillside lot developed with one house and covered with
many native trees, in a residential area on the west side of highway 101, close to the city
center. Surrounding property is mostly developed with single homes.
000035
ATTACHMENT B
2of7
ITEM NUMBER:
DATE:
Project description: The applicant wants to divide the site into three parcels, of irregular
shape. Each parcelwould be under 30%in slope.
DISCUSSION:
1. Slopes approach 30%. The Land Use Element (LUE) prohibits the creation of new
parcels on land 'averaging slopes over 30%, unless sufficient area on the property exists at
a lesser grade, r development of a home, septic system, and access, or unless easements
or dedications ill be created that are of direct benefit to Atascadero citizens. (Section
II.E.3 of the L ). Because of the irregular shape of the parcels to be created, the two
new lots are jut under 30% average slope. Because of the terrain, home sites would be
located along the ridge line(see further discussion below).
2. Development ill mean loss of trees, possible significant grading. The attached map
(Attachment G) shows the proposed building sites on these two lots. One of the sites
would be in a flatter area at about the 534' elevation , about 34' above the level of the
road. The other site would cut across slopes from about elevation 560 to about 570, up to
about 80 feet above the adjacent street. Slope of the two building sites is about 10 to 15%.
The existing ho ase on the property sits on a flatter knoll at about the 580' elevation.
Access to the new parcels would be by a shared driveway, 12' wide with a two- to six-
foot-high retai 'ng wall on the uphill side. The driveway would be at the 20% grade that
is the maximum allowed without special exception. Development of the driveway would
require rernovaI of about 12 native trees. Construction of homes and creation of small
yard areas would likely involve the removal of additional trees and may require up to ten
feet of cut.
The applicant's'proposal appears to be the most sensitive approach for the site. However,
even given the care taken to locate home sites and driveway access to minimize damage
to the trees and natural appearance of the site, development on these natural slopes
requires use of a significant retaining wall and the creation of home sites on the ridge
line, where exist several additional trees. It appears that extraordinary efforts would have
to be taken to develop these home sites. Therefore, subdivision does not appear to be a
reasonable action to take in this case.
3. The applicants want an exception to road improvement standards. Whenever
property is to a improved (beyond 25% of the value of existing improvements), road
improvements are required when they do not already exist (see Section 94159 and 9-
4.160 of the Zoning Regulations). Improvements on residential hillside lots are usually
limited to half of the construction of a "Rural Hillside Local" street, which is a 20'-wide
street, with an asphalt dike on the uphill side (see attached standard 402). In some cases,.
000036
ATTACHMENT B
3 of 7
ITEM NUMBER:
DATE:
improvement beyond the property is required, if traffic or dangerous conditions warrant
such extension.
Aguila Avenue is a short street that makes a loop from two parts of Venado Avenue. The
property sits at the northerly end of Aguila, one lot away from Venado. Aguila takes the
form of a dirt road along the property frontage. The dirt road is about 12' wide and is
located mostly within the 40'-wide right-of-way. Small portions of the winding road
extend beyond the right-of-way onto neighboring property across the street (in two
instances) and onto the applicant's property (in three instances). If the subdivision is
approved, road improvements to Standard 402 will be required, unless an exception is
granted. In this case, improvements would consist of asphalt paving of half of the street
and construction of an all-weather surface for the remainder(the easterly half).
Creating the full-width road would require significant grading and tree removals, as
shown on the Aguila Avenue improvement plan (in Planning Commissioner packets).
The applicants have therefore requested an exception to the requirement to grade the full
width of this street. The applicants propose to regrade and install an aggregate base along
the property frontage, and to pave the street from the edge of existing paving south of the
property to the proposed driveway. (See attached letter requesting exception from the
applicant's representative,Attachment E). This alternative would result in a road that is at
least 18' wide from the southerly intersection with Venado to the proposed driveway, and
a 12'-wide all-weather surface from the driveway to the northerly intersection.
As proposed, primary access to the site would be from the southerly intersection with
Venado, which would be paved to a minimum width of 18'. This width, especially on a
hillside road,will usually not allow two vehicles to pass easily, and therefore can result in
the loss of a significant amount of time in an emergency situation. Access from the
northerly intersection would be by way of an all-weather 12'-wide road with a
significantly steep section. If access from the southerly direction is somehow blocked,
this route may not be accessible either, and certainly would not allow the passing of
vehicles.
The exception process: The zoning regulations (section 9-4.159(d)) say that curb, gutter
and sidewalk improvement requirements, and by extension street improvement
requirements,may be waived,modified or delayed in the following instances:
(1) when, in the opinion of the City Engineer, the finish grades of the project site and
adjoining street are incompatible for the purpose of accommodating such
improvements.
(2) when the Planning Director and City Engineer determine, based upon the zoning
districts, that existing land uses in the site vicinity and existing and projected needs .
for drainage and traffic control, that such improvements would be incompatible with
the ultimate development of the area.
000037
ATTACHMENT B
4of7
ITEM NUMBER:
DATE:
(3) when the Ci Engineer determines that the improvements would be premature to the
developmen of the area, provided that the applicant posts a bond or other acceptable
guarantee ar d constructs the improvements within a period of one year or some other
time period stablished by the City.Engineer.
(In the case of subdivision, where the Planning Commission makes the final decision,
the Commission may choose to substitute its approval for that of the City Engineer.)
The City Engineer does not support the request. The required road standard is the
minimum required to allow for two-way traffic. If an exception is granted, the safety of
current and future residents and visitors in the area could be at risk.
The Fire Deparment is willing to accept a compromise that includes paving to an 18'
width where fe ible, reducing to 16' and even 12' where necessary to protect trees, and
installing turnouts in the narrower sections (probably two turnouts would be necessary).
In no case is the Fire Department willing to accept an unpaved surface, at whatever width,
for this road.
Staff is concern d about subjecting additional residents to the inherent danger of living on
a street that is already compromised, without improving access significantly. Yet
improving the road to full City standards could result in significant destruction to the
hillside. If this parcel map is approved with the exception requested, there may be no
opportunity in the future to obtain a full-width street along the property frontage.
Approving the subdivision amounts to accepting the resulting road condition essentially
for all time.
If the Commission supports the subdivision, staff recommends that the first finding be
made and that road improvements on the property frontage be required to include asphalt
paving for the flill frontage, 18' width where possible, and narrowing where absolutely
necessary, including installation of turnouts if needed, to the approval of the Community
Development, Engineering, and Fire Departments. Impacts to trees may be minimized by
.the use of mo'e than one retaining wall on the uphill side. If the Commission is
uncomfortable with such a condition without seeing the impacts ahead of time, staff
would support continuance of the hearing to allow the applicant to submit new grading
plans showing bow such a compromise might affect the property.
4. Is the project consistent with general plan goals? Basic Community Goals in the Land
Use Element(LUE)include(see Section A. of the LUE):
Preserve the contours of the hills. Buildings built on hillsides shall conform to the
topography using the slope of the land as the basis for the design of the structure.
Preserve natura flora and fauna.
000038
ATTACHMENT B
5 of 7
ITEM NUMBER:
DATE:
Policies in the .Open Space Element include (section Le and f of the Open Space and
Conservation Elements);
e. Lot splits.shall be thoroughly evaluated and be in accordance with community plans
and principles in order to retain the desired natural character of the community.
f. Attention shall be paid to the esthetic result of land division. Building sites shall be
encouraged on natural slopes, with minimum disruption of native vegetation and
watersheds by thoughtful placement of building site, private sewage disposal fields
and access. Building designs inappropriate for hillside locations shall not be
approved.
Policies for residential land in the Low-Density Single Family (Section C.2.a.(4) of the
Land Use Element) areas say
...Determination of appropriate lot sizes shall be based upon evaluation of such factors
as slope, existence of a natural building site, availability of sewer service, response time
for emergency services, distance from the center of the community, general character of
the neighboring lands, percolation capability of the site if proposed for private sewage
disposal systems, adequacy of access, and adequacy of building site. Low density
residential areas are appropriate for areas within the Urban Service line where
topography is relatively steep and where, scenic or sensitive characteristics of the land
should be protected through lighter density urban residential designation.
This tree-covered steeply-sloping land does not boast "natural building sites"As in many
other parts of the city, the ridgeline is the flatter portion,.and is here proposed as the
location for two new home sites. To build in these locations will require grading of a
driveway at the maximum 20% slope, construction of a retaining wall up to six feet in
height along the length of much of that driveway, and removal of many native trees.
Access to the site from the northerly intersection with Venado is problematic, and from
the south barely adequate, if the last portion is paved.
Given these constraints, it appears that the division of this lot may not be consistent with
the above policies; specifically with "existence of a natural building site...response time
for emergency services...adequacy of access". The basic goal to"preserve the contours of
the hills" may be violated by the creation of additional home sites on a tree-topped
ridgeline. It appears that the subdivision is not consistent with the General Plan.
If the Commissionfeels that, General Plan policies and goals can be furthered by
additional development of this site, then staff suggests that a condition be attached to
approval, requiring Precise Plan review of each new home development, specifically.
focusing on the appearance of the new homes. Attention should be given to the stepping
of the homes to the site, to the height of the new homes, and to the materials and colors
used for the new buildings.
000039
ATTACHMENT B
6 of 7
ITEM NUMBER:
DATE:
5. The subdivision design generally meets standards. The lots meet the minimum size,
width, and de 'th requirements for the zone. Lot lines do not conform to the general
requirement that they be radial or perpendicular to the street, but the subdivision
regulations allow flexibility in the design to meet design requirements. It appears that the
odd shape of the parcels is the result of the need to create parcels under 30% average
slope. There is no prohibition against adjusting lot lines for this purpose.
6. Environmental review resulted in mitigation. Protection of life was an issue in the
environmental initial study, because approval of this subdivision could result in
subjecting addi ional residents to an unsafe situation. The following mitigation measure
was therefore recommended:
Access must be provided that substantially preserves the existing natural conditions but
also provides zdequate access for emergency personnel as well as new and existing
residents in emergency situations.
The Fire Department has reviewed the plans and recommends that the subdivision be
approved so that additional improvement to the remainder of Aguila Avenue can be
required, as diE cussed above. That department does not support the applicant's proposal
to improve the existing frontage with an all-weather surface only, but is willing to
compromise road width standards to save oaks.
Conclusions
The subdivision does not appear to be consistent with general plan policies for development
in hillside areas. Creation of two new home sites, with the required driveways and
turnarounds, will require significant grading and removal of many trees, and installation of a
retaining wall up to six feet in height. The new homes would be placed on the ridgeline,
effectively eliminating that natural contour. Without additional significant grading and tree
removals, access 'would not meet minimum standards and may result in subjecting new
residents, along with the existing, to unsafe conditions in emergency situations.
On balance, it appears that the cost to the community, in terms of acceptance of significant
grading, tree removals, and additional residents on a potentially unsafe road, outweigh the
benefits. The site constraints limit the potential for reasonable development on the site. The
subdivision should therefore be denied.
Alternatives
The Planning Commission may approve the parcel map and road exception as designed or
with conditions modifying the map boundaries or limiting development options. Staff
recommends that i the map is approved, the Commission impose a condition on the approval
requiring Precise Pan review of each lot development, with particular attention being paid to
the fitting of the homes to the site, to minimize visual obtrusiveness. Staff recommends also
000040
ATTACHMENT B
7of7
ITEM NUMBER:
DATE:
that an exception to the road improvement standard be granted, requiring a paved road along
the property frontage, up to 18' wide where feasible, to the approval of the Community
Development, Public Services, and Fire Departments. A draft resolution of approval has been
attached, along with recommended conditions.
The Commission may approve the tentative map with full-width street improvements. This
alternative would result in significant grading and possibly many tree removals, depending
on the design,but could result in a street that is City-maintained. (All streets that do not meet
City standards are not accepted for maintenance by the City.)
The Commission may continue action if it needs additional information or analysis. Direction
should be given to staff and the applicant.
PREPARED BY: Judith Lautner,Associate Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A-- Location Maps (General Plan and Zoning)
Attachment B -- Tentative Parcel Map
Attachment C— Applicant-proposed Building Envelopes
Attachment D-- Engineering road standard 402
Attachment E-- Letter from representative requesting road exception
Attachment F-- Negative Declaration with Mitigation
Attachment G-- Resolution denying TPM 98010
Attachment H-- Resolution approving TPM 98010
000041
3.; Attachment C
RESOLUTION NO. PC 1999-010
A RIE SOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO RE-ADOPTING
AN APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TO DIVIDE
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
AND APPROVING A ROAD WIDTH EXCEPTION
AT 5190 AGUILA AVENUE
(TPM#98010; Jones)
WHEREAS, Grenville and Eileen Jones applied for a Tentative Parcel Map to divide a
5.7-acre lot at 5190 Aguila Avenue into three parcels of 2.63, 1.56, and 1.51 acres; and
WHEREAS, th site is located in the Residential Single-Family (RSF-Z) zoning district
which allows for the proposed use and density when certain findings are made; and
WHEREAS, the: proposed project is in conformance with the Land Use Element of the
General Plan and all other applicable General Plan policies; and
WHEREAS; the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed
Tentative Parcel Map application on April 6, 1999, and considered testimony and reports from
staff,the applicants, and the public, and clarified its intention on April 20, 1999;
NOW,THERE ORE, the Planning Commission takes the following actions:
SECTION 1. Negative Declaration with Mitigation. The Planning Commission finds that
the proposed project, as conditioned and with mitigation, will not have potentially significant
environmental effects. The Negative Declaration with Mitigation prepared for the project
complies with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is
hereby approved as adequate.
SECTION 2. Finding for approval of a road width exce tion. The Planning Commission
makes the following finding.:
1. An exception to the street width requirement is justified because the finish grades of the
project site and adj ining street are incompatible for the purpose of accommodating the full
street improvements required by Section 9-4.159 and 9-4.160 of the Zoning Regulations and
shown in Engineering Standard 402 (Rural Hillside Local).
SECTION 3. Findings fora roval of subdivision. The Planning Commission finds as
follows:
1. Thep ro osed subdivision as conditioned is consistent with the General Plan and
applicable zoning requirements.
000042
Planning Commission Resolution 1999-010 .
5190 Aguila Avenue
Page t
2. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the
General Plan and applicable zoning requirements.
3. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed.
4. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision will not cause
substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish and
wildlife or their habitat.
5. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the
public at large for access through, or the use of property within,the proposed
subdivision; or substantially equivalent alternative easements are provided.
6. The proposed subdivision design and type of improvements proposed will not
cause serious public health problems.
SECTION 4. Approval. The Planning Commission does hereby grant an exception to the
Zoning Regulations, allowing improvements to the Aguila Avenue right-of-way to be less than
20' in width, and approves Tentative Parcel Map #98010 as shown on Exhibit A subject to the
Conditions of Approval shown in Exhibit.B.
On motion by and seconded by ,the
foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT: - -
ADOPTED: April 20, 1999
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA
Harold L. Carden III, Chairperson
.ATTEST.-
PAUL
ATTEST:PAUL,M. SALDANA,Director
Community Development Department
000043
EXHIBIT B
Resolution No. PC 1999-010
Conditions for Tentative Parcel Map#98010
April 20, 1999
CONDITIONS
Engineering Division:
1. All public road and drainage improvements shall be constructed in conformance with the
City of Atascadero Engineering Department Standard Specifications and Drawings, except as
noted in condition no. 7, below,to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
2. The applicant shall nter into a Plan Check/Inspection agreement with the City. Prior to
recordation of the p arcel map, all outstanding plan check/inspection fees shall be paid.
3.. An encroachment p rmit for work within the Aguila Avenue right-of-way shall be obtained
from the City Engineering Department prior to the issuance of building permits.
4. The applicant shall provide a six-foot wide public utility easement along the entire property
frontage.
5. The applicant shall a responsible for the relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities. All
new utilities(water, gas, electric, cable TV,telephone, etc.) shall be installed underground or
as approved by the ommunity Development Director. Utilities shall be extended to the
property line fronta Ye of each lot or its public utility easement.
6. The applicant shall submit a grading and drainage plan,prepared by a registered civil
engineer, for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to recordation of the parcel map.
7. The applicant shall submit road improvement plans prepared by a registered civil engineer
for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to recordation of the parcel map. Road
improvement plans shall conform to the requirements of City Standard Specifications,
`Section 2 -Preparation of Plans. R-value testing shall be done, and the pavement section
designed by a registered civil .engineer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Road
improvements shall include,but not be limited to the following:
A. The Aguila Avenue frontage shall be improved as required to provide an all-weather
access road along the entire property frontage. In addition,Aguila Avenue shall be
paved a minimum of 18' wide from the edge of existing paving to the edge of the
proposed new driveway. The improvements shall be extended as required to provide
a smooth transition to existing improvements.
000044
Exhibit B
Conditions
TPM 98010: 5190 Aguila Avenue
Page 2
B. Slope easements shall be provided on each side of the right-of-way as needed to
accommodate cut or fill slopes.
C. The driveway serving the existing single family residence shall be reconstructed so
that it intersects Aguila Avenue within 10 degrees of perpendicular per Section
4.02.D of the City Standard Specifications.
8. The applicant shall acquire title or interest in any off-site land that may be required to
allow for the construction of the improvements. The applicant shall bear all costs
associated with the necessary acquisitions. The applicant shall also gain concurrence
from all adjacent property owners whose ingress or egress is affected by these
improvements.
9. The applicant shall provide notice either on the parcel map or by a separate instrument
recorded on, concurrently with, or prior to the recordation of the parcel map that there are
requirements for off-site and on-site improvements and that construction of the
improvements shall be required prior to issuance of building permits or other grants of
approval for development of the parcels.
10. The applicant shall submit a writtenstatement from a registered civil engineer that all
work has been completed and is in full compliance with the approved plans and the
Uniform Building Code(UBC)prior to the final inspection.
11. The applicant shall submit written certification that all survey monuments have been set
as shown on the parcel map prior to the final inspection.
12 A Mylar copy and a blue line print of the as-built improvement plans, signed by the
registered engineer who prepared the plans, shall be provided to the City Engineer prior
to the final inspection. A certification shall be included that all survey monuments have
been set as shown on the parcel map:
13. The applicant shall have the parcel map reviewed by all applicable public and private
utility companies(cable,telephone, gas, electric, Atascadero Mutual Water Company).
The applicant shall obtain a letter from each utility company which indicates their review
of the parcel map. The letter shall identify any new easements which may be required by
the utility company.New easements shall be shown on the parcel map. Letters from
utility companies shall be submitted to the City prior to recordation of the parcel map.
14. A parcel map drawn in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map and in
compliance with all conditions set forth herein shall be submitted for review and approval
in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance
000045
Exhibit B
Conditions
TPM 98010:5190 Aguila Avenue
Page 3
prior to recordation. The map shall be signed by the City Engineer prior to its being
placed on the agenda for City Council acceptance.
A. Monuments shall be set at all new property corners created and a registered civil
engineer or licensed land surveyor shall indicate,by certificate on the parcel map,
that comers have been set or shall beset by a date specific and that they will be
sufficier t to enable the survey to be retraced.
B. A preli inary subdivision guarantee shall be submitted for review and approval
by the City Engineer prior to recordation of the parcel map. '
15. A black line clear Mylar(0.4 mil)copy and a blue line print of the tract map shall be
provided to the City upon recordation.
Planning:
16. Proposals for homes on the new parcels are subject to Precise Plan review. Particular
attention shall be given to the placement of the homes,with the object of conforming the
buildings to the natural terrain and blending in materials and colors with the surrounding
natural environment. Grading shall be limited to that necessary to place the homes on the
site and provide small yard areas.
000046
ATTACHMENT D
Planning Commission Meeting—April 6, 1999
.Page 3 of 3
5. Tentative Parcel Map 98010—5190 Aguila Avenue
(Grenville Jones)
Subdivision of one residential lot into three parcels, 2.63, 1.56, abd 1.41 acres in area
respectively, including an exception to the road improvement requirements to allow a
narrower roadway than is normally required. (Staff recommendation.:. Adopt Resolution
PC 1999-010 denying approval'of Tentative Parcel Map 98010, based on finding it
inconsistent with the General Plan)
(Continued from the Planning Commission meeting of March 16, 1999).
Judith Lautner, Associate Planner, provided the staff report and answered questions by
the Commission. Staff recommended denying the project finding the project inconsistent
with the General Plan.
TESTIMONY:
John Falkenstien, Cannon Associates,. representing owner, Grenville Jones, expressed
disappointment that staff recommends denial of the project. Mr. Falkenstien stated that the lot
split is in character, the lots are buildable with excavation and grading which could be kept to a
minimum. Response time for emergency vehicles will be minimal due to the close proximity to
Traffic Way.
Jack Stinchfield 128 Riverback Lane, Paso Robles, owner of lot #19 spoke in support of the
applicant's request stating that these are beautiful view lots.
Grenville Jones, 5190 Aguila Avenue, applicant, thanked members of Commission who visited
the site. Mr. Jones candidly stated that he has resided at the project site for 25 years and the
property is too much to take care of at this time. Most of the trees to be removed are either dead
or dying.
John McGoff, 9192 Maple, stated he favored staff s recommendation.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
The Planning Commission presented several questions/concerns: '
• How many feet to improve entire road?
• Will improvements meet City standards?-
• Is an all weather surface road considered an improvement?
ACTION: Moved by Commissioner Fonzi and seconded by Commissioner Bentz to
approve Tentative Parcel Map 98010 by adopting Resolution No. PC 1999-
010 modifying conditions of approval.
AYES: Commissioners-Bentz,Carden,Fonzi, and Jeanes and
NOES: Commissioner Zimmerman
ABSENT: Commissioners Clark and Eddings
MOTION PASSED: 4-1-2
00004'7
..ATTACHMENT E
Planning Commission Meeting—April 20, 1999
Page 9 of 10
• Average yearly flo ,what happens when you have way above average yearly flow?
• o we truly have the capacity to handle the total load.
• 've been asking for 3 years for a sewer study.
Commiss ner Fonzi
• Are th\ea
along El Camino Real or is this a noncontiguous property?
• Likes tcontiguous
Chairman• Asked as.one of the options? Staff responded yes.
• If sewroperty, most residences will not hook up and will fight not to hook up
due to the expense.
Paul Saldafia
• Policy is if in USL and se is system fails you have to hook up to sewer if sewer is available.
• When system is designed, d ign will be such that ultimate hookup will be to that system
Commissioner Clark
• Will Commission get to review w 'ch route is proposed?
• Is there an advantage to pressure vs. avity?
• Expense was prohibitive glad not ire ed to tie in- option is nice
Paul Saldana
• No specific requirement or policy for PI commission to review final.sewer system.
• Ideally if design is CR or Traffic Way, desi should be for highest and best use.
John Neil Engineering
• looking at preferred is gravity this site is pressure cause it is uphill pump station #5 will
be upgraded. Thee may be other improvements
ACTION: Moved by Chairman Carden and second by Commissioner Eddings to
adopt Resolution PC 1999-017 recommendi and extension of the Urban
Services Line.
AYES: Commissioners Bentz, Carden, Clark,Eddings, an onzi
NOES: Commissioner Zimmerman
ABSENT: Commissioner Jeanes
MOTION PASSED: '5-1-1
ANNOUNCEMENT &REPORTS
7. Planning Staff eports
a. Tentative Parcel Map 98010—5190 Aguila Road
(Grenville Jones)
000048
:Planning Commission_Meeting—April 20,1999
Page 10 of 10
Staff reported that at the previous meeting, April 6, 1999, the tape machine was not
working and there was come confusion as to what the action actually included.
Chairman Carden called on Commissioner Fonzi, as the maker of the motion, to review revised
conditions for correctness. Commissioner Fonzie stated the following:
Clarification on 7a at the bottom of page 45.should read: "The Aguila Avenue frontage shall be
improved as required to provide an all weather access road along the entire property frontage."
The rest would remain as is. In other words, remove the portion that says "a minimum of 12 feet
wide and up to 18 feet wide where feasible." The intention behind this was that the road would
be graded so potholes would be illuminated and a surface put on so it would be assessable during
the rainy season, and that additional grading would not occur.
John Falkenstein,representative for Mr. Jones, agreed with the clarification.
CONIMISSIONER.COMMENTS & REPORTS
8. issioner Zimmerman
• ad to see ethics training
• Co ission should have information before newspaper
• Read licy regarding tie vote—appropriate to bring item to City Council
• Micki ena passed away—services Sunday at the Pavilion
• Adjourn in er honor
ADJOURNMENT—9:50 M. in honor of Micki Molena
Minutes Prepared By:
Patricia Schulz,Recording Secret
00 049
*. 51111,1111 'NMI Attachment F'
1979 Tentative Parcel Map.
C�sn Tentative Parcel Map 98010
5190 Aguila Avenue
t
\ / L-
-� \ \ 1.«gym•
\ 1
Lai\\.5 / - /107 o-
ow
wac.r
\ \ \ \ \� `1 `tea-- � 1 1 1(•\ \ ` a\,� �� � �`� /
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ _ \\ _sou� - v sf .',i .� ,... i �'^" "✓.�
\� \\\ \� -\ \\ \\�.\\\ \\\� ` >"'�'rt'�°'°ywlj°"•_'/�". 'A' '!.' ,moi
T
000050
Attachment G
l of 5
RESOLUTION NO. 1999-025
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL
OF THE CITY;OF ATASCADERO
UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S ACTION,
THEREBY APPROVING A TENTATIVE PARCEUMAP
TO DIVIDE ONE RESIDENTIAL LOT AT 5190 AGUILA ROAD
INTO THREE PARCELS
(TPM#98010(AT 98-104);Jones)
WHEREAS, Eileen and Grenville Jones requested approval of a tentative parcel map to
subdivide a 5.70-acre site at 5190 Aguila Road into three single-family residential lots; and
WHEREAS, the site is zoned Residential Single Family (RSF-Z), allowing the type of
use and density proposed;
WHEREAS, the proposed project is in conformance with the Land Use Element of the
General Plan and all other applicable General Plan policies; and
RE proposed project, as conditioned is consistent with the Zoning
WHEREAS,* the p p osed p J g
Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and all other applicable codes, ordinances and standards; and.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the tentative tract
map application on April 6, 1999 and approved the request; and clarified conditions on April 20,
1999; and
WHEREAS, Councilmember George Luna appealed that decision to the City Council;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on the appeal of the tentative
tract map approval on May 11, 1999 and accepted testimony, both written and oral, on the
subdivision proposal.
NOW, THEREFORE,
SECTION 1. Negative Declaration with Mitigation. The City Council finds that the
proposed project, as conditioned and with mitigation, will not have potentially significant
environmental effects. The Negative Declaration with Mitigation prepared for the project
complies with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is
hereby approved as adequate.
000051
Attachment G
2of5
SECTION 2. Finding fora royal of a road width excgption. The City Council makes the
following finding:
1. An exception to the street width requirement is justified because the finish grades of the
project site and adj ining street are incompatible for the purpose of accommodating the full
street improvement3 required by Section 9-4.159 and 9-4.160 of the Zoning Regulations and
shown in Engineerig Standard 402 (Rural Hillside Local).
SECTION 3. Findings for a roval of subdivision. The City Council hereby makes the
following findings:
1, The proposed subdivision, as conditioned, is consistent with the General Plan and
applicable zoning requirements.
2. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the
General Plan and applicable zoning requirements.
3. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed.
4. The design and improvement of the proposed. subdivision will not cause
substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish and
wildlife or their habitat.
5. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the
public at large for access through,or the use of property within,the proposed
subdivi ion; or substantially equivalent alternative easements are provided.
6. The'pro osed subdivision design_and type of improvements proposed will not
cause serious public health problems.
SECTION 3. royal. The City Council hereby upholds the action of the Planning
Commission, thereby approving Tentative Parcel Map#98010, as shown on Exhibit A subject to
the conditions in Exhit it B.
On motion by -and seconded by , the
foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote:
000052
Attachment G
3 of 5
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED:
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA
Ray Johnson,Mayor`
ATTEST:
Marcia M. Torgerson, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
000053
Attachment G
4of5
RESOLUTION NO. 1999-025
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO
DENYING A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TO DIVIDE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
ALONG WITH A ROAD WIDTH EXCEPTION
AT 5190 AGUILA AVENUE
(TPM#98010; Jones)
WHEREAS, Grenville and Eileen Jones applied for a Tentative Parcel Map to divide a
5.7-acre lot at 5190 Aguila Avenue into three parcels of 2.63,•1.56, and 1.51 acres; and
WHEREAS, the site is located in the Residential Single-Family (RSF-Z)zoning district
which allows for the proposed use and density when certain findings are made; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed .
Tentative Parcel Map application on April 6, 1999, and approved the tentative map subject to
conditions, and clarified that action on April 20, 1999; and
WHEREAS, Co ncilmember George Luna appealed that decision;
WHEREAS, Th' City Council conducted a public hearing on the appeal of the Tentative
Parcel Map on May 11, 1999, and considered testimony from staff, the applicants and
representatives, and members of the general public.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council takes the following actions:
SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council makes the following findings:
1. The subdivision is not consistent with the General Plan Land Use and Open Space Elements,
in that no natural bi ilding site exists without creation of a steep driveway and retaining wall
along with the rem 'val of many native trees, access'proposed is inadequate in emergencies,
and contours of the lls may not be adequately preserved through additional development.
SECTION 2. D ial. The City Council does hereby overturn the decision by the
Planning Commission, thereby denying Tentative Parcel Map#98010.
On motion by and seconded by , the
foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote:
000054
Attachment G
5of5
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ADOPTED: May 11, 1999
CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA
Ray Johnson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Marcia M. Torgerson, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney
000055
ITEM NUMBER: D - 1
DATE: 05/11/99
No CIA
iais � �s s
CADS
City Manager's Agenda Report
Wade G. McKinney
Annual Audit
RECOMMENDATION: .
Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Moss, Levy&Hartzheim to
conduct the 1998-99 fiscal audit at a cost of$10,250.00.
DISCUSSION:
Annually,the City is required to prepare a fiscal audit. City staff circulated a Request for
Proposal and received five proposals ranging from$10,250.00 to $27,100.00. The low bidder,
Moss, Levy&Hartzheim has performed the City's audit for the last six years. Typically,staff
would recommend using a different audit firm after five years.. However,given the Y2K and
computer problems facing the Administrative Services Department,staff is recommending Moss,
Levy& Hartzheim for an additional year.. The firm is familiar with the City operation and would
have the least impact on our staff.
The bids received were as follows:
Vabrinek, Trine, Day& Co., LLP $27,100
Terry E. Krieg, CPA $26,000
Glenn,Burdette, Phillips&Bryson $21,000
Brown Armstrong $23,680
Moss,Levy&Hartzheim $10,250
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact of staff s recommendation would be $10,250. These funds are budgeted.
ALTERNATIVES:
Council could select another firm. This option was not recommended as the recommended firm
_ was the lowest bid and would have the least impact on a very busy department.
RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services
000056
ITEM NUMBER: D - 2
DATE: 05/11/99
all IM
i9is w i9 a
City Manager's Agenda Report
Wade G. McKinney
Request for use of the Youth Center by the Atascadero Boxing Club
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Postpone decision on the request by the Atascadero Boxing Club to use the Youth Center
"Pool Room," and reaffirm the policy on the use of the Youth Center.
2. Direct staff to agendize an item to consider the City's ownership of the Historic Printery
Building at a future meeting once notification of pending grant status is known.
i DISCUSSION:
Request
John Martino, Vice-President of the Atascadero Boxing Club has submitted a written request to
use the Youth Center Pool Room for the purpose of creating a boxing gym. The Atascadero
Boxing Club has proposed to renovate the space to current building code standards, with the
exception of the seismic retrofit. They propose to use the space free of charge for the first year
and rent the space thereafter at a mutually agreeable rate. A copy of the letter of request and a
packet of accompanying information is attached. Also attached is a map of the Youth Center,
highlighting the requested area.
Back rg ound _
The Youth Center/Printery building was.donated to the City of Atascadero by the Atascadero
Masonic Temple Association in 1995,for the expressed purpose to be used as a Youth Center.
1.3ecause the gilding is an unreinforced masonry structure its use has been severely limited. The
City had seismic retrofit plans prepared at a cost of$72,000,but has been unable to perform the
necessary work do to funding constraints. The estimate for retrofit work is currently more than
$975,000 (1996 dollars). The City hascompleted a variety of improvements projects and
maintenance on the building at an average annual cost of$23,000. In addition to the seismic
concerns, the building does not meet standards for the Americans with Disabilities Act, and is in
need of additional electrical work.
Unreinforced masonry buildings have received a lot of attention in the State. They are particular
concerns due to the exposure to risk in an earthquake. The City is unable to obtain earthquake
insurance on the building. The liability exposure to the City is great and especially when used as
a youth facility. This caused the City to adopt a policy on facility use severely restricting 000057
ITEM NUMBER: D - 2_
DATE: 05/11/99
activities. A memorandum from Brady Cherry to the Community Services Department staff
describing the current use policy for the Youth Center is attached.
Tenants currently in the building are primarily those who occupied the building when the
Masons still owned it. The Youth Network uses the building on Friday evenings by to conduct
Friday Variety Night, a teen drop-in program.' Other use is limited to special occasion one-time
activities only.
Issues
There are two issues before the Council. First, given the structural and code concerns of the
Youth Center,should it be used. Second, if so,will the Council agree to use by the Atascadero
Boxing Club.
Relative to the first issue,the building concerns are serious and the liability is extreme for a City
the size of Atascadero. The City cannot secure insurance to protect it financially and staff are
concerned about the personal issues of taking youth into a building that is known to be deficient.
The City is not likely to afford retrofit in the near future. The most optimistic scenario would be
a grant. The Atascadero Recreation Center Committee (ARCC)has applied for a grant to
renovate the Youth Center. The California Department of Corrections is offering grants for the
purpose of providing/renovating youth centers. ARCC applied for a$3,000,000.00. Notification
of award of the grant will take place in June,and staff feels that it would be premature to decide
on long-term use of the Youth Center until after ARCC notification about this grant. If ARCC
receives notification that the Department of Corrections grant is not approved,then it will be
City staffs recommendation for the City Council to reconsider long-term ownership of the
Youth Center/Printery Building.
If the grant is approved, City staff will work with ARCC and the Atascadero Youth Task Force
on a Facility Master Plan. Long term plans for the building will assist in reviewing requests such
as the boxing club to insure that they are consistent with efficient use of the building. The Pool
Room will occupy a space that when renovated will provide a valuable location for a variety of
other youth activities. Early plans depict this space for future lounge and multi-purpose activity
room for youth. A determination has not yet been made on the "highest and best use" of any
areas in the Youth Center building. The Boxing Club proposal is to improve the space in
exchange for rent for a year. This kind of sweat equity comes with a sense of ownership, without
knowing the long term plans for the building,the club could be allowed to do something that the
City would then want changed.
Relative to the second issue,should Council decide to use the building it may be appropriate to
advertise the option and allow additional proposals. The Boxing Club have submitted a good
proposal,but others expressing interest have been advised that the City has restricted the use of
the building. If there is a change to this policy there are likely several groups that would be
interested in making aproposal It would seem appropriate to reevaluate the City's opportunities
if the use policy was changed.
000058
ITEM NUMBER: D - 2
DATE: 05/11/99
Commission action
On March 15, 1999, staff recommended denial of the Boxing Clubs request to the Parks and
Recreation Commission based on the information presented here. However,the Parks and
Recreation Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council approve the
Boxing Clubs' request to use the Youth Center Pool Room. The Commission felt that the'City's
current Youth Center ise policy was inconsistent and therefore favored the request.
FISCAL IMPAC
Approval of the Atascadero Boxing Club request for the use of the Youth Center Pool Room for
the purpose of a boxi g gym could save on some costs associated with the building renovation.
Estimates on these savings are not determined and could only be estimated by establishing a list
of building improvements that the Boxing Club would be required to complete before occupying
the space. These renovations would primarily benefit the Boxing Club. Free use of the space for
the first year of occup cy would involve some subsidy of the Boxing Club by the City.
Currently, the Kenyu an Karate School pays the City $450.00 per month to lease the Youth
Center Gymnasium on Monday through Thursday nights from 6:00 until 9:00 p.m.
Long term liability isE ues are cannot be identified with great accuracy.
ALTERNATIVE
Approve the BoxingClubs' request and direct staff to return with an agreement to lease the
Youth Center Pool Room to the Atascadero Boxing Club, contingent on the completion of the
necessary improveme its to the Youth Center Pool Room to meet current building code standards
for public use. A previous arrangement between the City and the Boy Scouts could be used as a
model for this arrangc Ment. Staff would recommend a monthly rental payment to cover all
utilities, maintenance and the recovery of some of the long-term infrastructure costs.
RESPONSIBLEDEPARTMENT:
Community Services Department
ATTACHMENT
Letter from the Atasc dero Boxing Club
Youth Center Facility Diagram
Memorandum from Brady Cherry
Letter form Bob Wes
000059
J The v
Atascadero
Boxing
_ Club _
y
000060
AT 5CADERO BOXING CLUB (ABC)
Licensed by United States Amateur Boxing Inc.
12. February -1999
Atascadero Recreation Commission
To Whom It May Concern
I would like to introduce myself and the Atascadero Boxing
Club, Inc. (AEC) . I am John Martino of Atascadero. With my
associates, I have formed -the Atascadero -Boxing club, Inc
(ABC) . The ABC was formed under license from United States
Amateur Boxing, Inc. We will be , working . locally in
association with the Central Coast Boxing Association. ABC
is currently incorporating in the State of California as - a
non-profit corporation, that will operate off of donations.
We of the Atascadero Boxing Club (ABC) were created because *
of some of our beliefs, among them are the following: We
belive amateur' boxing is a great sport as well as a terrific
way to combat juvenile delinquency. . It is completely
different from professional boxing in its goals, objectives,
scoring and- equipment.
Amateur boxing can be a source of excellent conditioning for
the high school athlete during the off-season. It also
provides an option for the youngster who is not involved in
school sports programs or does not desire to participate in
team sports. Amateur boxing can also provide a youth with
the opportunity to satisfy the basic human need of
recognition in a positive manner. All to often this need is
met through delinquent behavior. -
When properly coached and supervised, amateur boxing can be .
an extremely fulfilling and beneficial experience forour
You ths. It can be used • as a vehicle to instruct : in
sportsmanship, values of conditioning, positive release of
frustrationsand energies, in addition to._ building . self-
confidence and character.
I, John Martino, have lived and worked in Atascadero: since
1988. My work with young people of our community includes
000061
ATASCADERO BOXING CLUB (ABC)
L Licensed by United States Amateur Boxing Inc.
the following accomplishments.
o I -am umpire chief of the Atascadero Softball '
League,
o As a member of the Atascadero Softball Player's ,
Association; I have helped to__raise_ $12,.000.00
that was used to refurbish Paloma Park
o I have been umpire chief of the Atascadero 'Little
League from 1993 to 1996
o I have been a volunteer workerfor the Community.'_
Services Recreation .Department for eight years
The purpose of this introduction is to ask for your.
assistance. We would like to receive your permission to use
the Youth . Center (Masonic Temple) now being used as a
storage area to set up boxing ring environment. Any
improvements made by our 20 volunteers, . volunteer coaches
from area police departments and contractors, electricians,
plumbers, etc. will be in compliance with all relevant
codes. We recognize that the .ABC- would be responsible for
all utilities . used. We ask. that this spacebe donated for
the first year rent free. Beginning with the second year we
would pay a , mutually agreed to, rent.
To this end, we request an appointment before the Recreation
Commission to put forward this proposal. We would be
grateful for any assistance provided to us in this area.
I believe that the Atascadero Boxing Club can make a
significant positive contribution to our community and with
your help we will begin doing so.
Thank your for your time and assistance.
Sincerely:
John artino
Vise President,' ABC
United States Amateur Boxing License # 00 05082 ' 46 6
- r
JM/ss
000062
j
A ASCADERO BOXING CLUB`(ABC)
-Licensed by United States Amateur Boxing Inc.
To Whom It May Concern:
We, the officrs, are proud to announce the formation of the
Atascadero Bo ing Club (ABC) . The ABC was founded to
provide boys nd young men of our community with a healthy *
outlet for th it energies. Youth amateur boxing has a long
and proud his ory in our country, on need only look at the
success and p ide of men like Oscar De La Hoya. Throughout
our history amateur athletic clubs, boys clubs and police
athletic leagues have offered °boys an opportunity to learn
boxing, self discipline and self esteem skills.
Research showus that, correctly run, amateur boxing
programs are AFE for our youth. - Amateur boxing
consistently anks lower than baseball and .football in
serious injur es. TheAtascadeio Boxing..Club _(ABC) is
. associated wi h United States Amateur Boxing, Inc. and .The
Central Coast Boxing Association. These organizations :
provide the guidelines for the safe teaching and exhibition
of boxing skills.
We look forward to your help and support in our effort to
bring healthy recreation to our community. Working
together, we can help our youth develop good self esteem and
personal discipline necessary to becoming productive
citizens.
Signed:
Lawrence H. E sterday .(09 05084 46 2) Local Business Owner
John F. Martino (00 05082 46 6) Umpire/Referee
Stephen R. St osser (00 05083 46 4) Corporate Consultant '
000063
ATASCADERO BOXING CLUB (ABC)
Licensed b United States Amateur Boxing. Y ng Inc. ..
We, the officers of the Atascadero'Boxing Club(ABC), are proud to announce the
coming of amateur boxing to the north county. The Atascadero Boxing Club will provide_
the youth of the area training and sanctioned bouts in amateur/Olympic style boxing. We
are is licensed by United States Amateur Boxing,Inc., and associated with The Central
Coast Boxing Association.
We,of the ABC ,believe amateur boxing is a great sport as well as a terrific way to combat
juvenile delinquency. It is completely different and infinitely safer than prize fights you see
on television. Amateur boxing provides an option for the youth who is not involved in a
school sports program or does not desire to participate in team sports. Amateur boxing
can also provide a youth with the opportunity to satisfy the basic human need of
recognition in a positive manner. All to often this need is.met through delinquent
behavior.
Amateur boxing is consistently rated as one of the SAFEST sports you can participate in.
If you would like more information about the ABC, or wish to contribute your help or
donations to help thisprogram, contact the Atascadero Boxing Club at:
Atascadero Boxing Club Phone: 805/466-4319
8231 Los Osos Road, Suite 158 Fax: 805/466-4319
Atascadero, CA 93422 e-mail: feezy@tcsn.net
We appreciate any support you can provide.
000064
AT SCADERO BOXING CLUB (ABC)
UlcensAMASMURdUMNS ANbt6AfEdRhg Inc.
It is often stated that, "Boxing is a dangerous sport and should be banned!" Let's
take a look at that statement as it relates to AMATEUR BOXING.
Amateur boxing isa great sport as well as a terrific way to combat juvenile
delinquency. It is minpletely di rent from professional boxing! The safety of
amateur boxing ha been well documented. The 1995 National Youth Sports
foundation ranked imateur boxing 32nd out of 37 sports,well below mainstream
sports such as wres ling,football,soccer and even bowling. Most of the negative
publicity about the sport centers around PROFESSIONAL BOXING which is much
different than amateur boxing. No other sport takes more precautions in regard to
safety than amateur boxing.
Let's look at the re ord.
o In the US k football leads to 250,000 concussions annually and accounts for
95% of all catastrophic sports injuries.
o Interestingly, concussions occur at a rate of 6.1 per 100 college football
players,3.7 per 100 hockey players, 2.5 per 100 wrestlers and about 1 per 100
amateur boxers.
o Recent es imates of deaths per 100,000 young people were as follows;
soccer 4 in 100,000 use of contraceptives 3 in 100,000,getting hit by a car 6 in
100,000, smoking 00 in 100,000 and amateur boxing 2 in 100,000!
o The Aust align Conference of Science and Medicine in Sport 1995
reported, "There is no evidence of neuropsychological impairment in boxers
compared with controls and no association between boxing exposure.
o The Natic nal Safety Council's 1996 Accident Injury reported that Boxing
ranked 23rd on its list of injury reports. Amateur boxing has reported fewer
accidents than soccer,wrestling,tennis,volleyball, gymnastics, basketball and nearly.
every other participatory sport that is being offered and endorsed by academic
schools in America
o Researchers at the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health
published the following in the March 1994 issue of the American Journal of
Epidemiology_, "The data collected suggests that there is no link between
participating in amateur/Olympic-style boxing and changes in the central nervous
system functions."
Amateur boxing is a safe activity for the youth of today!
000065
ATASCADF�R0 RBOXI -CLUB t C)
SAM se§�RUn ecf S�aFes ma A BQ G
Yeur Boxing Inc.
Amateur(Olympic)boxing is.very different from Professional (Prize Fighting)in many
ways. Basically amateur,boxing aim is to..score points;whereas in professional boxing
you try to incapacitate your opponent. Lets look at the individual differences:
amateur professional
o Rounds Five rounds of two minutes As many as twelve rounds of three
minutes'
o Headgear Properly fitted, REQUIRED Not Allowed
o Scoring A point system 20 pt. must By rounds by organization
o Scoring A punch with the knuckles. Damage done
landing on a legal area
` o. Scorimg points for defensive Awards point for damage doAwards ne
skills
o Scoring Decreases emphasis on Encourages head blows
scoring blows to the head
o Scoring Does not reward for power Rewards for power of the blow
of the blow
o Gloves Standardized for protection Varies by sanctioning body
of the opponents head
o Mouthpiece- Standardized, form fitted Varies'by sanctioning body
o Shirt Required to absorb sweat Illegal
and dirt to reduce infection
o Physicals = Pre and Post mandatory Pre fight only
g
o "Eight Counts" Encoura ed ' Not allowed in some bouts
'
o Intent Scoring points The knockout
000066
• r '' CIS O
C C1. cd �. G •d
LN tyi . • � � . . O
-- O R O •a U p Co
n .� Co O p0 O O- C14 £' Q p Cl
.b�~9btn
tn9 69 b 9GN4 cn 60
9
O O p o � O.0 0 O O p p O O p Cl p p O C Co Co CD
p
Cl 4= cl C pO"} 6 p OC..••. O Op O'p 'a O O OO OO
O •.. �0 N � ., ar O Op t/j v1 Vj O� �'' u69pz'
b9 fA 69 6A Gq ; b9 b.9 � OS O 6NR O 40 CL CC Op
* ed ' N V .0
O 61% C •t' � 69 69 69
Cd
v O
O Com.. 'O •o
r
•� AD � O cQ � .O cif .0 �+ v j N � � •R•.O •�
E v E
OO O •w a� v � .o•_ 3.. OO
O u � 0 yC G O• G
Vapp :
.y v uH H
o • mo0c � ZS -e 42 n0tai)
y
o .
O - EC ROv Q V O
• ,O $ . �
o
'..
u
a oaa as o . oca o a
C's -zw ¢ca as
C
a e c c
0 .2
••• V v v v v '' � � aai �+ ,,,fl
a o a) .a
p4 a
.R R R Lln o, In L C� po p0• v
•d oma_ 2 o a u C 04
•r.. • •r.. •r.. •r.. N rU,• N ?
V
• cd t4 co to cd bo rA O > C: L:
tom. C �O
v > v > V > v > J
O O O O O O O O 4. O
(n U. cnU W cnU .aV o E C7 W Qa
. H9 •• N� w
OO
bo CP f� u eG. O• �" titer. o
,«+
cl V O u O u cyj
Q
Lt i Ll.= Cn y Vj cd V a
u aV vv .� Cd u .O 0Z .2 o Q
•�v
Cd
ch
LO :4 N -+
O v I v aS :. O v v O .O 't7 .. b .cd V
Ow
> > Eb-Q ¢tz
o o N vaS ¢O
Q = cKo L
CA
Op-Qz u
> ' 0 .
to c/ ° � 1-iIli j° cda� cd c. V.m�
CL
00006'7
UNiTED STA
R
OXING
Certificate of Membership
This certifies that
is a club member in good standing of the
USA
and USA Boxing and is subject to the rules
BOXING® and regulations of USA Boxing.
USA Bobng Executive Dlrect4 Effective Date
President Expiration Date
Local BoAng Committee
Regist 'on Chaj4n Local Bo)dng Committee Club Number
Local Bwdng Com Ates
00008
416W/Untitled'
ATASCADERO BOXING CLUB
CENTRAL COAST BOXING ASSOCIATION
5400 ENSENADA AVE.
ATASCADERO, CA 93422
(805)466-4260
(805)466-43.79 FAX
To Whom It May Co cern:
We,the officers, are proud to:announce the formation of the Atascadero Boxing Club
(ABC). The ABC was founded to provide boys and young men of our community with a
healthy outlet for thei'r energies. Youth Amateur Boxing has a long and proud history in our
country, one only ne look at the success and pride of men like Oscar De La Hoya.
Throughout our history amateur athletic clubs, boys clubs, and police athletic leagues have
offered boys an opportunity to learn boxing, self discipline and self esteem skills.
Research has shown 1 s that correctly run programs are SAFE for our youth. `Amateur
boxing consistently ra nks lower than baseball and football in serious injuries. The
Atascadero Boxing Cub(ABC)is associated with United States Amateur Boxing, Inc. and
the Central Coast Boi 'ng Association. These organizations provide the guidelines for the
safe teaching and exhibition of boxing skills.
We look forward toyour helpd support in our effort to
anort pp bung healthy recreation to our
community. Working together we can help our youth develop good self esteem and personal
discipline nece i bec productive citizens.
Signed
r
Lau ce E: 9 05084 46 2) Club President
Local business owner (805)466-1223
John F. Martino (00 05082 46 6) Club Delegate
Umpire/Referee City Of Atascadero
Community.Services (805)466-4260
/tephen . Strosser( 0 05083 46 4) Corporate Consultant(805)466-8392
--(805)466-4379 Fax
00009
10H
l
..11/23/98 9a24 PM
Central California Association
- Boxing Clubs
1. All American.Training Center 2. Atwater P.A.L
III
.. Inocencio.Madera Dennis Kendall '
1701 Truxtun Ave 1729 Eucalyptus
Bakersfield Ca 93305 _ Atwater Ca. 95301
H. 805-845-1164 H. 209-358-1681
W. 805-324 8742
- 3. Bakersfield P.A.L 4. Bull Dog Boxing Gym
Mike Dallas Zeke Lopez,
2909 Marlene PI 120 Gonzalez Dr
Bakersfield Ca. 93304 Hollister Ca. 95023
H. 805-827-0920 H. 831-636-1349
W. 805-8837-9840
5
5. Central Valley Amateur B.A . 6. Dream Champ A.B.0
Victor Duran Clemente Hurtado
Po Box 11952 ' 2835 C St
Earlimart Ca. 93219. Selma Ca. 93662
H. 805-849.0511: H. 209-896-4071 .
W. 805-849-2611 .
7. Exeter Boxing B.0 8. Manteca'Boxing Club
Andy Murrieta William H. Graham.
311 Pomelo Ave 919 Mt Vernon Plac
Los Banos,Ca 93635 Manteca Ca. 95336'
.H. 209-826-6299 H. 209-823-5741._
000070
9. Merced Cron sroa.ds B.0 10. Merced United B.C. _
Timothy Rar 110S.. Willie Felix
238 Sweetwater 167 Sweetwater Ave
Merced Ca. 95340 Merced Ca. 95340
H. 209-385-3989-N. H. 209-722-6408
11. Modesto P kL 12. Norhtside Boxing Club
Sam Lacro s Javier Robles
1133 Coffe' ' Rd 4915 W Darthmouth Ave
Modesto Ca 95355 _ Visalia Ca 93277
H.209-529-2192 H.'559-627-2779
13. Orange Cove Foothill B.0 14. Pixley Boxing Club
Glen Bailey Joe McPhetridge
37632 Feather Lane 2289 N Ceder St*
Squaw Valley Ca, 93675 Pixley Ca. 93256
H 559-338-2344 H 209-757-3870
W2097757-3870 '
15. Renteria's oxing Club 16. Sanger Youth B.0 •.
Jesse Rent ria =. Osvaldo Vera Jr
824 N LakSt 667 S Docke
ry
Madera Ca. 93638 Sanger Ca. 93657
H.209-67.5-8510 H.559-875-3309
' 00001"
17. San Luis Obisbo BC 18. Southeast Fresno Boxing"Club
Pat Murphy Nestor Chacon
-3101ndio Dr 2409 E McKenzie
Pismo Beach Ca 93449 Fresno Ca. 93701 '
H, 805-773-1702 H. 559-268-8581
19. Stanislaus County P.A.L 20. Stockton P.Y.A
Erik Shultze _ Frank Dobales
1325 Beverly Dr 240 E. Gibson St
Modesto Ca 95351 Stockton Ca. 95204 '
H. 209-529-9121 H. 209-463-3651
W. 209-892-2589
. . - 21.:Tulare Athletic Club 22. Tulare Westside B.C.
Manuel Torrez Anthony Ledesma
17609 Rd 80 411 S. Prat
Tulare Ca. 93274 Tulare Ca. 93274
H. 209-686-7531 H. 209-686-6592
23. Tommy's Team 24. Hanford Boxinng Club
Tommy Tillery Frank Moseley
516 Dorothy St 945 111/2 Ave
Bakersfield Ca, 93306 Hanford Ca, 93230
H. 805-366-4265 H. 209-582-5581
W. 209-582-8100
000072
25. Atascadei o Boxing Club 26. Riverdale Athletic Club
John Madino Guy Webb
5400 Ens nada Ave 262 W Lewiston Ave
Atascadej o Ca. 93422 Riverdale Ca 93656:H. '805-46642610'- H.109-923-2113
UN ATTACHED CLUBS
1. Rick Mello 2. Jorge Martinez
Po Box 141.7 720 EBarry More
San Juan Bautista Ca 95045 Stockton Ca 95204
H. 408-681-3112 H. 209462-5822
W. 408-848-4143
0000'73
USA BOXING.,
ATI
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA ASSOCION; nvr
OFFICERS : A
PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT SECRETARY
- ARTURO ALAFAL
LOUIS JORDAN RICK MELLO -
2728 S Sowwel St 2003 Glen Harber ' P.O.BOX 876
Visalia Ca. 93277 Ceres Ca. 95307 SAN JUAN BAUT CA
209433-5491 209-531-1611 408-848-4143 95045
TREASURER CHIEF/OFFICIALS
JOE MCPHETRIDGE ANDY MURRIETA .
Po Box 314 311 POMELO AVE `
Pixley Ca. 93256 LOS BANOS CA,93635
209-757-3870 209-826-6299
REGISTRATION CHAIRMAN ;
ZEKE LOPEZ
120 Gonzalez Dr
Hollister Ca,95023
831-636-1349
SPECIAL EVENTS,
RULES and REGULATIONS, Louie Jordan,
FINANCE, Joe Mcpetridge, Danny Lujan,
TT., .�.,.
BOARD OF REVIEW,Manuel Torrez, Andy MtL*,6ta T,� b ,,..
COACHES COMMITTEE,Red Bailey, Ruic
SR COORDINATOR, Louie Jordan,
11FF101F A T C rn1%iTW4FrrTT+ 1 A..d.. M....�.:etn Aerl R..ao., n.....,u.,.,ao ..'..
Vf 1 iViL wily /Vl.iltlt a 1—Ij A".YJ L.�MI.I..�{\, 1�..Y Y{.al.r„LVM�
JO COORDINATOR, Michael Dallas sr,Zel a Lopez, Anthony Martinez
NEWSLETTER, ANDY MURRIETA
REGISTRATION COMMITTEE, Zeke Lnrer.;
SAFETY COMMITTEE, Red Bailey,Randy C?iay$
GOLDEN GLOVES,`Manuel Torrez
SILVER GLOVES, Louie Jordan
UNDER 19, Andy Murrieta
PHYSICIAN
Peter Brill Dos Palos 209-342 6131
Osc,ar.Hemandez Porterville 559-784-6096
Robert Harway San Luis Obisb 805-541-3505
George La*enson Visalia 209-733-4570
Jerry Fox Bakersfield 805-872-3648
Jerry Seydel Bakersfield 805-3280558 ®'
Donald Higgins Visalia 559-6274116 '
Gregory Shubert Fresno 559-434-3408
Vincent Pennsi Lodi 209-476-8979"
% _
`+ Marion Bernard Bakersfield 805-871=5662.
tZ
Jose Martinez _ Corcorn 559-838-4506
0000'75
cl _ .
cl .O
0. cis ti = _
Co
O
kn F14 6tnR 6 00 -
O 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 O Co 0 0 0 O O 0 CCD O O
O dO ^ OO 40 N O DOOO O OO Op 't3O C O C0 co CyOj
c •.. 0 O_ p" v1 h a0+ O O p V1 v1 vj O yj ?� a0, Ffi p Z• O O O
�� O b 4 O G. p Cl
O O
•t—V,—V, 69 E3 %crj
69
O
w asN o
o o a=i _ H_ vN
aoja
�. a,
Q1 a� w: �U a� w a.V CL 10 _ w V yw 0 0
E O o a+ O. 0.� O
H 023 N Y� 0.� � cq N 0i � aYp N � °� u �� O
o. o c oN c a o �, ;e c°i c Co. o
ni V ._ •U U '" ._ •p V v t� '� .0 .•"U C3 V C. +�'S O V V O O C
al' c G TJ V Lpqr�
O. u n °� a, u n 4 cL a`> w a� p 0 � u � � u9 0 O Cd
p OAD pp D pGp D A 0 co inuji1 •Zuj
C
c °
� ._ u a Cl
••• V v v U v c cd' ami h .o
MMV U V V
Y+y a c=0 cl Cd .. Ln
gn
a a cdcq
o c
CIS bo v as U
_ C bo
cl = cu s- = cd G N o
O 0 ° ° u O 4, .O CdV Y, O
cnU cnU NU cnU :aux o DC7. t:a Aa
14-
>0
y o a0+ O N
- _
c Q
N `
N V
C4 •� O C Q C 'C o ate.
O
V CL +; a cn 'c cl y i� C'sp
a� _
tY ° v.•= p .o a� ami .° O ° o O
cl
L tpou cpe/K] •LQa�L+] (Nv N EV C~O•Dq( ci] " •QO.0E QH� 'c7 ^E
O 0 c
to CIS'v O j CO4) '
O = C m 0 -Ow V NOa O vN ¢ b L
0Z Q Z HO O .° cd ° cd a. mG~Vj
C p .
..
'tates Amateur Bwdng, Inc.
U Il ted co 80909.5776
Onc Olympic Plata, Colorado Springs,
Phone: (719) 578/4506 -- FAX: (719) 632-3426
USA CERTIFICATE OF LUBILITY 'REQUEST
Cert ficates will be walled to the address of the Sponsor Ciub only
BOCYIN
Sanction.# -
a. Name of Sponsor .Cl b give club #
If requesting a Certi rate for training, gl .
b. Address of Sponsor ub State Zip
aty
c. Phone Number of S onsor Club
d. Third Party Requir-hig Certificate Contact Person
Relationship of.Thi 'd Party
Address
CityState �P .
e. Location of Event or Training Facility
f. Send Certificate viaRegular Mail. Fax (Circle one) '
Attn:
If by FAX, give FAX number
g.
Date of Event Number of Spectators
b. Name of Event '
(if training facility, writc 'training")
•i. Local Boxing Com ittee (LBC) Officer Signature
LBC Name Number
Address
j. Is Third Party to b named an Additional Insured? Yes No
k. Date Certificate is needed
FEES
$100.00 - Third Party Liability. Certificate
$25.00 Club Liability Certificate
*Submit 30 days prior to the event - A $10.00 service. fed will be charged for requests received less
than 30 days prior_
to a date the certificate is needed. For certificate requests received less
than 10 days prior to a date it is needed, a $25.00 service fee wvU'be charged
*Please print or type - A'$10.00 service fee will be charged for re-issued or corrected certificates
due to incorrect or added information
'Complete all sectlonsIncomplete forms can not be processed and will be returned*to you. If
request is returned less than 30.days prior to the date the certificate is needed, $10.00 service fee.
will be charged
Mail form and fees (payable to USA Bo)ing) to your Local•Boxing Committee
-OFFICE USE ON000077
Date-received by SA Boxing
DrDate forwarded to ACORDIA -
rf hC��
UNITED STATES AMATEUR BOXING
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA•ASSOCIATION INC.'
I t
-ICAL FORM
NAME ADDRS9£ D.O.B. AGE
CITY
STATE ZIP CODE PHONE
HISTORY
�IA4 DANT EVER HAD Awv OF THE FOLLO)MGz
SWOLLEN JOINTS . YES NO_ RHEUMATISM YESNO_'. ,
FREQUENT HEADACHES YES NO CHRONIC COUGH' YES '` NO_
SPITTING UP BLOOD YES NO_ CONVULSIONS YES NO_ _
SHORTNESS OF BREATH YES NOFAINTING SPELL'S YES---NO
NO
VENEREAL DISEASE YES NO_ DIZZY SPELL'S YES---.NQ--
WORN
ESNO_WORN OR WEAR CLASSES YES NO_ BLURRING VISION YES NO_
DIABETIC YES NO� EPILEPSY YES NO_
DEBILITATING DISEASE YES NO_ ORAL SURGERY YES NO
EXPLAIN ANY YES ANSWERS
HAS APPLICANT EVER BEEN "OCKED UNCONSCIOUS IN SPORT YES--NO
IFYES LONGEST DURATION OF UNCONSCIOUSNESS .
ALSO GIVE DATE AND PAR•TICULAILY
UUTARY SERVICE
MILITARY SERVICE YES No TYPE OF DISCHARGF.
IF REJECTED,GIVE REASON
IF MEDICAL DISCHARGE GIVE REASON
HAS APPLICANT EVER BEEN A PATIENT IN A MENTAL HOSPITAL YE:S NO_
IKYES EXPLAIN IN FULL
0000'78
_ = AT SCAbERO BOXING CLUB -(ABC)
` Lic' nsed by United States Amateur Boxing Inc..
LIST OrVOLUNTEERS
KEY
C=Coach R=Ref ree TK=Time Keeper V=Volunteer FR=Fund Raiser
NAME STATUS CONTACT
Larry Easterda V,C,R,TK,FR 466-1223
John Martino V,C,R,TK,FR 466-4260
Stephen R. Strosser V,C,R,TK,FR. 466-4319
JoAnna Martino V,TK• 466-4260
Kevin Farr V 461-3422
(Dentist)
Rush Kolemain V
John* Berwick V,C 466=0609
(Police Offic r/olympic
Boxer)
Chris Cauley V 466-2585
(Atascadero News)
Robert Pebeni o V 466-1642
(Knock Out Sports Atas)
Adriel Pebeni o V,C -- ---- 466-1642
Pro. Boxer
Elmer Amillan ' V,C 466-1886 .
Don DeNoyer . , VIC 934 4866
Joie Serma V,C 464-0193
Jim Coorley V_ . 466-2669
(Construction Co. )
Gary Foster V
(Foster Enterprises)
Pat Murphy V,C 773-1702
Gene •Baier V 462-2637 000079
Steve .MeNamarer u 227-6320
(JLC Construction)
Steve Miller V.. ; 466-9641
Sara Rah V 466-7244
Jeff Flynn V 462.-8426
Becky Bringer V 595-9946
(Golden Gloves Rep)
Larry Tem[lin V,C
(Retired Fire Captain
Santa Barbara/Amateur
Boxer)
Jim Lynch V,C 238-9020
(Retired Fire Dept.
Engineer)
Ray D. Landry Jr. V 461-0364
Eric Hagen V
(Architect/Atascadero
Building Inspector)
Walker Davenport V 438-5356
Tony Maluney V 461-9478
Steve Hysell V 466-2137
Bill Reeves ` V 461-5999,
J.R. Ortiz V . 461-4135 -
Justin Yates .V 226-9075
Mark Levenson V-C 460-9.631
. :r
Gerald Phillips V r 462-1361 : ,'
Betsy Phillips V 462-1361.-
Mike Phillips V 227-0947-
Alex 'Gonzales Jr. V 462-1251
Jason Platz v 462-1538
000080
Joy & Manny. T rres V 461-1643
Al & Dora Bro n V - 466=200.0
J.P. Patel V 466-4449
Gail Stanhope V 461-0754
Randy. Wright V 466-1823
Sean Kain V,FR 462-2515
Dave Josephs V,FR 461-1113
Kevin Miller V,FR237-0415
Craig Jacubes' n V,FR 546-9133
Eddie M. Tche 1 V,FR 461-3246
Scott Woodhouse: V,FR462-0523
Culin Cambell V,FR 438-3909
Cimon Cormier V,FR 434-1102
Iwena Van Beek V,FR 461-0267
"Boomer" V,FR 772-8225
Terry Peterson. V,FR 434-3352
Larry Halderm' n V,FR 466-5694
(N. County Christian HS) '
Mike Jones .V 466-5694
(Aarons Boys ome' Atas: )
James Bond V 466-2580
_ Ed Ferrell V 466-10,04 .
(Ferrells 'Aut Repairs) _
Dave Kennedy V . 461-3283. V _
(Five Star Gutters)
Stan & Sonya , ain . V 466-1817
Joe Subia :. V 466-0313
000081
Lupe Rodriguez. V 938-0846
(Integrity* Group Homes).
Mickey Rourke V
(Movie Star)_
Tony Ciminelli V,FR .(62 21)725-1266
(Visions Pacific,. LTD .
Jakarta, Indonesia) `
J
Tony Ciminelli V,FR (62-2.1)725-1266
William Karg FR LA
Harvey Krager FR LA
Stan Friar FR OC
John Fado FR Seattle
i Herb Long FR LA
(Film Maker)
George Caras FR Cambria
Stanley Strosser FR SF
Teresa Roberts V - 481-6451
(Behavioral Psychologist)
000082
NiTED STATES
TEUR.
OXII\TG
Certificate of membership'
This certifies that ,
is a club memberin good standing of the •
and USA Boxing and is subject to the rules
BOXI and regulations of USA Boxing.
149�
USA Bo)dng Exert6ve DirectJr Effective Date
President Expiration Date
Local Boxing Committee
pit.
Registry ion C a ntee
Local Boxing Committee Club Number
Local Boxing Com d
000083
James Cooley Construction
Lic. #485803
_ 6407 Portola. Rd.`
Atascadero CA 93422
805-466-2669
March 2, 1999
To whom it may .concern.
I know John Martino .through my long standing participationin
Atascadero's softball leagues, where he has been the chief of
_..umpires.
My .family strongly supports John's effort. to establish the Atascadero
Boxing Club to serve young people in our community. My wife
teaches locally, and we have two teenagers and a toddler. We know
first hand that the community needs more variety in sports activities
for our youth.
John has a fine reputation for professionalism. We know that he
would bring successful leade:•ship to this new effort.
Sincerely
Jam Cooley
000084
- February 26,1999
Dear John Martino:
My name is John Berwick, and I am currently a youth counselor for the California Youth
Correctional Facility in".laso Robles where I have worked for eleven years. My duties include:
supervision of youth off nders,gang coordination, and community service coordination. I am
also coaching Basketbal and Softball in Atasca.dero. I have a Bachelor of Arts degree in Physical
Education from Fresno Pacific University where I played Basketball there on an Athletic
Scholarship that I received.
I would like to congratu ate you on your recent attempt to develop a Atascadero Boxing Club., I
was also an amateur boxer who obtained the California State Championship and the Pacific
Coast Championship. I a four-time California Police Olympic Super-Heavy Champion and
the World Police/Fire Gimes Champion. I have assisted Dave Martinez at the La Habra Boxing
Club where I worked.with youth at risk. The phone number there is: (213) 690-455.9 or(562)
694-3414 or(562)697-7418. Overall,I have a lot of experience working with youth boxing
programs.
I feel that a boxing club ould benefit the community.in several ways. 'First of all,the boxing
club would be a non-prc fitable organization and would give several youths the opportunity to
develop self-esteem, resect for others, participate in positive physical activity, develop
discipline, structure,an a place where they can go after school. Now,more than ever,
communities must develop positive activities for youth. Our society needs to continue
developing programs which will provide activities that give all youth the opportunity to develop
both physically and mentally.
In conclusion,the youth in our community need more avenues that are positive. They need a
place to go after school is out or when they become bored. They need people who care,people
to talk to, and they need dedicated people, like myself,who are willing to volunteer time and
energy into positive co unity activities..
If you have any questions,please feel free-to page me at:-(805)227-9714.
Sinc ely,
J Berwick
000085
to
c s F uArt i
,. .: 2/16/99
To whQ_m Wit' may co}zcern,
When approached by Mr. Martino a month or so 'ago
my�thoughts were; "What a , positive outlet" ! The youth we-deal- with
:at' csur facility are in constant need of legitimate ways to consume
thezr time. Many have, anger management problems that could be .re-
solve: through physical activities. The Atascadero Boxing Club
sound's like one of' those ideal situations.
We cannot commit to any certian number of individuals,
as they would have to earn the right to join such a club. However,
interest among our residents is high. We could provide some super-
vision for our youths, but as stated previously the residents who
attend would have earned some trust to be on their own. We 'support
this program in theory, and with future participation.
Re a tfull
(senior counselor/teacher)
1
.77
000086 C
Architecture
= � Planning Eric E. Hagen Associates
6711,Morro Road (805)4663257 �
P.O.Box 202
Ata adeno,CA 93423
March 8, 1999
Re:Atascadero Boxing Club ,
To Whom It May Concern:
For the past several years, 11 te had the pleasure of being associated with Mr.John Martino. I've witnessed with great
respect his enthusiasm for t e advancement of sports in our community. His support is unbounded,it extends for adult
and for youth sports alike. Indeed, he has probably acted in the official's role at as many events for my children as he
has for myself.
'Mr.Martino brings certain q lities to the field of play with him,no matter what the activity. Those qualities are
maintained from the time he steps on the field until he leaves the facility,and are never compromised: They serve as .
fine examples of sportsman hip,professionalism,a mutual respect for the game and for the individual,care and
diligence in calling each play with all the tools he has at his disposal,and seeing that all proceedings under his
jurisdiction are carried out in the utmost spirit of fair play. ..
Safety is an important consideration in-almost any sport requiring physical play,and I've seen John on several
occasions stop play.when th re is even the slightest chance that a participant or a spectator's health or welfare might
be endangered.'
wish Mr.Martino the best o luck in establishing Amateur Boxing in our community. Enough cannot be said about the
virtues of such an organization,both in its providing a healthy outlet for our youth and an avenue for possible
advancement to a higher level of competition.
am confident that any orga' ization lucky enough to have Mr.Martino spearheading its development is well worth our
community's support.
Respectfully Submitted,
Eric E. en
000087
McWAktitIc
_ ATASCADERO BOXING CLUB
CENTRAL COAST BOXING ASSOCIATION
5400 ENSENADA AVE
ATASCADERO,CA 93422
(805)466-4260
el
21 November 1998
To Whom It May Concern:
I would like to introduce myself and the Atascadero Boxing Club,Inc..My associates and I have formed
the Atascadero Boxing Club,Inc. (ABC). The ABC was formed under license from United States.
Amateur Boxing,Inc. We will be working locally in association with the Central Coast Boxing
Association.'ABC h currently incorporating in the State of California as a Non-Profit Corporation and
will operate off donations.
The goals of the ABC are as follows:
* To provide safe instruction In the art of boxing.
* To provide a healthy outlet for the energies of our youth.
* To help develop positive self esteem in young people.'
* . To teach self discipline and good citizenship.
I have lived and worked in Atascadero since 1988. My work with young people of our co,mm
. y i;P P unity
includes the following accomplishments:
* I have been the Umpire In Chief of the Atascadero softball league since 1990.
* I am a member of the Atascadero Softball Player's Association. I have helped to
raise 510,000.00 which was used to refurbish Paloma Creek Park Fields with new
fences and scoreboards.
* I was the Umpire In Chief of the Atascadero Little League from 1993 to 1996.
* I have been a volunteer worker for the Community Services Recreation
Department for eight years.
The purpose of this Introduction is to ask for your assistance. We would like to request your permission
to use the vacant space in the swimming pool area of the Youth Center so that we may set up a boxing
ring environment. The necessary improvements will be made by our volunteers and licensed contractors.
_ The improvements made will be in compliance with all building codes..We understand that ABC would
be responsible for all of the utilities used.
In conclusion,we request an appointment before the Recreation Commission to present this proposal and
answer any questions that might arise..We would appreciate any assistance that could be provided to us
in this matter.
I believe that the Atascadero Boxing Club can make a significant and positive contribution to oqr
community,and with your help we will begin doing so in the near future.'
000088
1 of 2 -
11iD/%8.30 Plv
fdeJ//Untitled
Thauldng you in-advance for time and consideration in this matter,
Sincerely:
John Martino
United Safes Amateur Boxing License#00 05082 46 6
JM/ss
000089
2 of 2 >>m/OR RAO PM
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 14, 1995
TO: ALL COMMUNITY. SERVICES .STAFF
'FROM: Brady Cherry, Director of Community -Services/A!:�/
SUBJECT: YOUTH CENTER.USE RESTRICTIONS
The recent Architect's Report from F. L. Henderson and Associates
on the existing conditions at the Youth Center/Printery Building.
contained information regarding the structure's seismic integrity,
hazardous materials, access and exits. Upon receiving the
Architect's Report, the City Council took action to restrict public
use of the building. The City Council's action confirms the
staff's current use policies for the building.
For future reference, please remember to observe the following
directives at the Youth Center:
The basement area is to remain off limits to all members of
the public and City personnel. Due to the presence of
asbestos, anyone needing access. to the basement or
maintenance, etc. ) must receive permission from the' Director.
Storage will not be allowed in the basement.
• Until further notice, the second floor of the Youth Center is
to be used by the Masons and their affiliates only. Due to
ADA requirements and inadequate exits, this area is not ready
for use by the general public.
• The private use of the Youth Center Building by the tenants,
including the Masons, 'Eastern Star, Getty Photography, and Ken
Yu Kan Karate will continue as before.
• Public recreation programs will not be allowed in the building
on an on-going basis due to the building's condition, and
concern for-public safety. The building's use for recreation
programs will be restricted to special events,-. and temporary
relocations of programs from other facilities due to schedule
conflicts, maintenance work, etc. ' Such temporary relocations
must be strictly limited. Please see the Director if you have
any questions
Thank you for your cooperation and observance of the above
policies. The Parks Division will soon post signs on the
building's entrances notifying the public of potential seismic
safety risks. Plans for a more affordable addition to the building
may allow for the safe use of the building until the rehabilitation
and seismic- retrofit can be accomplished.
QXYTHCENTEIYOUTHC M.POL
000090
G�
wLL: ,L LL
c�
� � �
Q LO co
ton N
o NL �
c 6 W o r cr, 0 _
U- CC O Z ® ® c
W � � Z . j
z ED
.0 pC o w m p
o Q z � � '
CO W � a ui H ® H
U `L � m Cl)
ox
o 0 c; R-
13 E3LLIa
LL: W CO
0 U- o
0
W
o ; m x
OC o X s
CL
LU
cc !
C P
c
e � N
W ru
cc
G Z Q 7
111 � 4464.-
D x
M
; F.. .
Z 4 LJ.
000091
x .
0
TO: Geoff English
FROM: Bob West
DATE: 1$MAR99
SUBJECT: Youth Center; Boxing Club
My feelings are that this is a Youth Center for Youth, not 20 and 30 year
ald men and women or professional fighters looking for a low cost place to
train. The City should keep in mind that the Youth Center is just that, a
YOUTH CENTER, not for private use unless they pay the going rent /rate,
based on the hour or total use fee. The Karate Club pays about $500.00 a
month and uses the Gym for about 20 hours a month ($). The City pays all
other costs. The gym is used or can be used by other youth activities or
rented out when not used by the Karate Club. This seems to work well.
Now if the Boxing Club wants to build the 'Pool Area" up to code and pay
the utilities in lieu of rent and when they are not using the area it can be
used for other youth activities the this might be a good deal for all
concerned. The youth in the City gain because; they would have more room
for different activities, the Boxing Club gains and the 'Youth CenterO gains
with more funds to make other improvements to the center.
it sounds to me to be a special interest of boxing and not toward all, youth
to whom the City/Center should be focused. Don't loose control of the
overall use of the Center for all youth,
Bob West ,.
Private Citizen
00002
- ITEM NUMBER: D - 3
DATE:-05/11/99
ro-M ® ie e
� CA] +oi
City Manager's Agenda Report
Wade G. McKinney
4" of July Fire Works Display at Atascadero Lake Park
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve a request by Bill Rabenaldt;owner the Lakeside Cafe and Catering Company to
conduct a professionally staffed pyrotechnical fireworks display at Atascadero Lake Park on
Sunday, July 4, 1999.
DISCUSSION:
Attached is a letter from Bill Rabenaldt, owner the Lakeside Cafe and Catering Company to
conduct a professionally staffed pyro-technical fireworks display at Atascadero Lake Park on
Sunday, July 4, 1999. Mr. Rabenaldt is proposing to bring back fireworks to Atascadero Lake
Park and is prepared to conduct a community-wide fund raising campaign to cover the costs.
Although not stated in his letter,Mr. Rabenaldt stated to staff,that he is also requesting that the
City of Atascadero cover all of the staff support costs for this proposed event.
During the 1970's and 80's, the Atascadero Jaycees and the Atascadero Reserve Firefighters
Association annually sponsored a fireworks display at Atascadero Lake Park. Apparently,
several of the Reserve Firefighters were licensed Pyro-technicians and they were responsible for
detonating the fireworks. This event attracted large crowd estimated to be near ten thousand. The
City of Atascadero helped sponsor the July 4`"Celebration during the first few years of
Incorporation by covering staff costs which in 1982 were $3,400.00.The July 4`h Celebration and
Fireworks at Atascadero Lake Park were last conducted 1982.
Staff research indicates that the Atascadero Jaycees decided to discontinue sponsoring the July
4th Celebration and Fireworks following the 1982 event. The City Council voted on April 11,
1983 against a private proposal submitted by Jerry Pickard and Mike Molina to continue this
annual event. Legal concerns as well as crowd and traffic control issues were sited by the City
Council as reason not to continue this annual event. Fireworks displays have not been held at the
Lake Park since 1982.
Staff supports the proposal by Bill Rabenaldt and feels that the traffic and crowd control issues
can be mitigated through proper planning and staffing. Both the Police and Fire Departments
also support the proposal and have stated that they can provide the necessary staff support to
00003
ITEM NUMBER: D - 3
DATE: 05/11/99
supervise the event. In addition, staff believes that some of the traffic congestion that existed
during prior 4'of July Fireworks displays will be reduced by the traffic signal now in place at
the corner of Portola and Morro Road. Staff support of this event is contingent on fund being
available to pay for the additional City personnel required to provide adequate levels of safety
and maintenance services.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Early estimates of City costs are as follows:
Department of Community Services
Planning/Coordinaing 1 P. &R Superintendent x 10hrs. x$40.00=$400.00
Event Supervision 2 Parks Maintenance staff x 8 hrs. x$30.00=$480.00
Clean-up 4 Parks Maintenance staff x 4hrs x$30.00= $480.00
Custodial supplies $100.00
Police Department
Traffic/Crowd Control 10 officers x 10hrs x$30.00= $3,000.00
Reserves 1 Sergeant x 10 hrs x $40.00= $400.00
Fire Department
Fire Prevention- 4 firefighters x 6hrs. x$40.00=$960.00
TOTAL ESTIMATE: $5,820.00
ALTERNATIVES:
Deny the request.
RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT:
Community Services Department
ATTACHMENTS:
Letter from Bill Rabenaldt
00009 }
LakeSide Cafe&Catering Company
9315 Pismo Avenue
Atascadero,CA 93422
(805)464-4402
(845)773-5518 Main Office
April 27,1999
Attn: Geoff Eng ' It
City of Atascade fl
6500 Palma Avei ue
Atascadero,CA 93422
Dear Mr.Englis ,
Having reviewed your ordinances for the City of Atascadero,it is my understanding
that fire work d' plays are allowed at Atascadero Lake Park providing the
permitting proc s is strictly adhered to.
I have taken the iberty of speaking with Chief Mike McCain of the City of
Atascadero Fire partment and Chief Dennis Hegwood of the City of Atascadero
Police Departme it.regarding this issue. Both departments believe they are capable
of insuring public safety daring this event and are supportive of the fire works
returning to Aft cadero Lake Park.
With that in mind,I am requesting the City Council review and make a finding
regarding this proposed 4th of duly night time fire works display with a
professionally staffed pyrotechnical crew in charge of the event.
Sincerely,
4Billbenaldt
000095
04/24,1993 11:50 8057735510 BILL RABENALDT PAGE 02
ri
TAWide'Ufe&Catering Company
9315 Pismo Aveaue
Ata atdero,CA 93422
464-OM
April 24. 1999
Attn: GeoffEnglish
City of Atescadero
Parks&Recreation Department
Dear Geol,
I just left yOu a message on your answering machine but thought it might be helpful if I
put some my ideas in fent of you before we spoke.
i
Last night X was watching the news about the Strawberry Festival in Santa Maria A
member of the Elk's Club was sitting in a bucket suspended off a crane trying to get
donations for their rodeo. I don't plan on any stunts like that but one thing he said made
a lot of sense. He got 75 business owners to pledge 5100 towards the event He then
placed con irms at each of their business locations for the public to donate to the affair.
If they m e Ned$100 or more,then that took care of their pledge. If not,the business
made up difference. As anodwr incentive,I plan on renting booth space on Saturday
and Sunda for$350 for both days. For a business that participates,they could rent the
same space for$275(not firm on the cost yet).
My compa#iy will do all the food,(Cafe,Hot Dog Can,Ice Cream Cart,Rib BBQ and Tri
Tip BBQ).! Other vendors would include crafts,.non-profit opportunities,etc. I would
also like td,see if your police department might be interested in having a DARE booth(at
no cost)aabring your dog for demonstrations. The Fire Department could have a hook
and ladder 1&monstration on Saturday and Sunday(during the day)and leave the units
available for the Fire Works Show.
The Pavilion is booked on Saturday night the 3rd of July but is available on.Friday night
the 2nd. i was thinking of having a 50's dance on Friday night to kick off the weekend of
events. This could include a buffet dinner in the early evening that would lead into the
dance.
The non p it organizations could have a greatly reduced booth fee and do fund raising
activities vwhich might provide some entertainment for the children(face painting,bean
bag tosses�ith small prizes etc.)
,
000096
04;'2411999 11;50 8057735518 SILL RABENALDT PAGE 03
Atte: Geoff English Page 2
City of Ataseadero
We could hold fishing derby like we did last year and give prizes for the biggest fish
AW heaviest of fish. I wouldn't went.to do u fishing clinic or anything like that
during this bus time. Wbicb reminds me, I don't know if you know or not,but the
Atascadero M icipal Water Co. is going to take on the Fishing in the City prograttt.
I'm going to with the Fire Chief again on Monday,try to get some commitments
from the busirw ss community and then r u shoot the letter off you asked me to prepare. I
hope this can in front of the City Council quickly. 'There is only two months before
the event and Ill need every bit of that time to put this whole thing together.
Please give me a call and let me know what you think
Bill Rabenal
P.S. I just found out yesterday that my wife,Jenifer is going to have a child. At 32 I'm a
little appre ve but she's a wonderfW person and has waited for this moment her
entire life, She'll be a great Mom.
00000'7
x 1 (� •
04/25/1999 10:02 8057735518 BILL RABENALDT PAGE 01
VOW 11%mw
u 0
Hca � v
0 TOO
c
� A
000098
cd,
M E M_O_R_A_N_D U M
TO: _. .City: Council
FROM.- . .City. Manager .
SUBJECT: _ Fourth of July Celebration
DATE: April -7 , . 1983
The attached memoranda from the 'City Attorney and ..-Chief-of
Police express some major concerns with the proposed Fourth of .
July program as submitted by Mr. Pickard and Mr. . Molina.
I -concur with their conclusions and add that the Fire Chief
has expressed sim' lar reservations as well as expressing . the need
for assuring tran it for emergency vehicles..
The fundamen al .question still must be answered - should there
be an organized Furth of July celebration at the Lake Park?
If the answer to that question is in. the affirmative, then the
question'of spons rship needs to be resolved. Sponsorship;:could be. .'
from a recognized' _non-profit service or community organization. able
to provide -the necessary indemnifications, organization and- manning.
Conceivably, a private individual or individuals could provide the
same organizationand capabilities as a service club or community
organization assing that the proper indemnifications were provided,
that this use of the City' s facilities was not for profit and provided
that the Council was satisfied that this individual or individuals,
could perform as ,agreed to.
Another alt rnative. could be for the City to undertake the entire _
.project under the Recreation Department and using all City resources
necessary to provide the level of celebration desired by Council. The
Council would have to alloate the requisite financial 'resources to
_ accomplish this approach.
Another alternative could be a combination of City involvement
with commitment of` City resources and a service club or community
organization.
Each of these alternatives. has attendant problems >but each are
possible, given- the commitment .to have and 'support the Fourth of
July celebration
Strictly fr m the standpoint of financial commitment, i.e: ,
either through actual cash outlays or provision of manpower with
attendant salary costs, andin-consideration of the magnitude of
activity the Staff does not feel that the City' s participation is
the best solution.
000099
It' is . the Staff . feeling that a community service•.:club or
organization . is` the best resource for conducting "an,_ event of this
type assuming that .concerns "for.;the. public.- health: and" safety ".and
protection.;of public and;"private;property are::. answered. But should"
a :sery"ice" club or similar- organization not be `found which was" willing
to . undertake this task, then •the.;project shouldbe, dropped unless .the
Council determines that the over-riding community interest dictates
having a_celebration. In that case, ,the Council 'should .-fund the whole
project However, " the fundamental question of whether or. not to have
the Fourth of July, celebration still must be answered.
SUR L. WARDEN
MLW:gk.
ft
ol00 "
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING �� �' CITY ATTORNEY
POST OFFICE BOX 747 POST OFFICE BOX 749
ATASCADERO.CALIFORNIA 93423 ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93423
PHONE: (805) 466-8000 PHONE: (805) 466-5678
_ CITY COUNCIL Ce,
CITY CLERK a � :
CITY TREASURER POLICE DEPARTMENT
INCORPORATED JULY 2, 1979 POST OFFICE BOX 747
CITY MANAGER ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93423
FINANCE DEPARTMENT PHONE: (805)466-8600
PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT , FIRE DEPARTMENT
RECREATION DEPARTMENT < 6005 LEWIS AVENUE
ATASCADERO,CALIFORNIA 93422
S.
r
'.PHONE::(8051 466-2141
MEMORANDUM April 1,. 1983
TO: Murray Warden, City Manager
From: Allen Gtimes, City Attorney
Subject: Fourth of July Celebration
This will acknow edge receipt of the outline of the.plan for the Fourth of.
July Celebrationpresented` to the Council.on .Monday evening., March 28, by `Mike
Molina and 'Jerry .Pickard.
The AtascaderoLake Park is a public park devoted to public uses. I seriously
question the leg lity of depriving the public of the right to use the lake
park area for a my 4th celebration. This doubt reinforces itself when, in
addition, a prop' sal is submitted to the Council to adopt an ordinance autho-
rizing the charging of admission to the Atascadero Lake Park on July 4, and
the allocation of the money to private individuals. Clearly, this seems to
me to be an inva id gift of public funds, which is prohibited by the Consti-
tution," and which would subject the members of the Council, if the gift is
made, to the con ention that it is an ultra vires act for which they could
be held respons' le and would have to dig up the money in reimbursement out
of their own pockets.
A more fundament 1 matter is .that_.the City.should .not, in wisdom and.good
practice,. enter into any-project of-this kind, 'except with. an organization .
having stability, both financially and politically. . Therefore, the organiza-
tion, as has been required by so many cities, should be a nonprofit corpora-
tion. It should be a corporation which can provide the necessary liability
insurance to the City and indemnification for any.damage that may be done.
Covegage in this regard could readily be justified in the figure of a $5
million blanket policy, including property damage.
The outline of the plan indicates a request that those.operating the project, .be allowed to pa k vehicles on public property and to charge $1.00 to $1.50
per vehicle for parking. The same comments made heretofore with respect to
the blocking off of the lake park area and charging admission apply to this
proposal.
000i- 0l
MEMORANDUM: . Murray Warden
April 1, 1983
r
Page"2,.
It should be obvious that any organization which is"going to`sponsor a-_July -:`
4th celebration''should 'be .responsible, for raising the. revenue on its own with
its own activities; and' not..as,a •ba$�s _of government' providing the means to
furnish the revenues. It would seem as. hough if a July 4th celebration of
the kind proposed is desired by the community, that the sponsoring.organiza-
tion should be engaged in year-round activities to raise the money. needed for
it, and that when the day comes it should have in-hand what it considers fully
adequate to fund.the various anticipated costs.
With respect to the request contained' in the outline for an ordinance passed .
that no alcoholic beverages be allowed on the lake park property; I believe :
that such an ordinance is prohibited by the Constitution, as it is preempted,-
since the state has total control of the possession of .alcoholic .beverages,,
Moreover, it would appear to be discriminatory to pass an ordinance prohibiting
any alcoholic beverages on the lake park property, assuming such ,is valid, _
and; at the same time, permit beer booths at the lake:
I trust the foregoing may be of assistance to you in rendering .a staff report .
as to the aspects of the proposed plan.
AG.fr,
f fJ� -
_.000102
MEMORANDU. M _.
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: .' CHIEF OF POLICE
SUBJECT. _J LY .FOURTH..CELEBRATION PROPOSAL- (JERRY,;PICKMA M
D 'MIKE MOLINA)
DATE: -A` RIL 5, 1983
As you know, Pickard .and Molina, as individuals (not: .
sponsored by a ' organization) , have requested Council approval
on the control and use of .Atascadero Lake Park for .the July....
Fourth celebration. While the presentation was lacking sufficient
detail for me to effectively evaluate the plan, following are
Problems which I for.eas on the basis of the limited information
furnished:
1. Who w ll man the proposed barricades?
2. Who will supervise the-workers at the various posts?
3. The ot tline submitted, mentions security within the lake
and al the barricades; again, who will these people .
.'be an who will.-supervise .them? -Are these people to.
be of -duty police: officers from other'.cities or: are
they o be private security personnel? Who will be
liabl for their individual. acts?
4. In addition to the usual fireworks display, other
activities were mentioned (food booths, game booths,'
boxing' match, carnival) . : Who will coordinate these
actio ties? Which carnival is being considered?
Can such a large variety of activities be properly ' - -
supervised?
5. Picka 'd and Molina propose that celebrants park their
vehic es at Atascadero High School for a fee of
11$1.0 to $1.50° each. .'Question: why will people. want
to pa k .so far..away from 'the activity when they may
in fa t. park.-closer on .public streets free? ' Also ' -
feel
Also 'feel that moving thousands of people (many of whom will
be in oxicated) from the park after the celebration
is over via dial-a-ride vans is unrealistic if not
impossible.
6 I dont believe that the selling of "family plots" is
pract cal. nor do'I feel we could possibly. enf orce , such
a provision.
Other issues as raised by Allen Grimes I concur with.
RICHARD*' McH LE
000103
RHM: sb
a L . �•.• " :< T t• ! +, < .., lY - _ ! r•3�4._ tx fir a �a t ',fj� - a a.E{`, =.t? -.
�MB tr t . ` ' ) Y {>i ,., ', v t.. 2! t •., 4 t- =u.d Le. ' tib..' •'� r*t
_�sr.' c� r r L n
+t:. A., �. t " `• p y z 1 - f,t x 5. ,L + t t. -�•• f e . a: Jr�� - �-'�at t k` >�- ¢k->`
1 a {
,{• b - 'y , �f>t "rf -:f f r ;•r Y SIT r ! -,-1. : 'r,? Yr r tV i,-1 'Vf.` .y , i-,I�I� y �, <
i'• :• 7 } .. t `c'r= 4 L.-� r.4.. •rt'T ; t i ,,sfV-{., 't r 2. k'+'•T'1lr,'.c$3�_k 5
.rr!� Atascac�ei o `Jaycees ..V Get r i* r- ��i j� .t kms=
•''t� M1 POST OFFICE BOX 1075 ' •, ATASCADERO CALIFORNIA 0422 -
�, : r T tit a [ - t w yr [s > `F �. r i
^-
-✓/�, t Fl l �!� fi� _ S 'c 9 tN f J g! .-t ¢S =rc x r t''t. y. _� "ti 's .5.,,r,+ •L.k'• J 3'` C 'v !,i
FD STP' s e r* f t ! }� {d/=B t "t t s F F:t , sS n t r k \t !)y
/!`' G r ..T " .I+ b J ei -e F{`?^,S! .t_.r-.r far .i{n , 1 ! `> L f-
:�t- ✓AYC EES i t •`t t '�. t.•� - V`- .rt i a r.( `�•'. fc j ,t s}�C f.r.) f� ,ri `t'r r T,i J n i r ,1\j' : G l Y• 3..
>.'l...f-. - T J o.f `;t tN- _ - =5X0}i s.}i`3"r, 1k{.: ! w.rr l,..Y S��hi E 4}ft. .1.. .c �Fp';y U'��n iii Zyt .S � -�S 4 t F. �,� 'S`w».-E:.
„•,••. L' :'t t• r,.+ r xa\.t,r ,'L . a �"'?iF {Ih Jn4 k•"e'f'r'�j•"t.tr`'r:t,.r'`<! 9 ,�tA=K• t J k x'izy v'6 `
'` �� .. -r ' r` i' ' ���- + 1 i ks y. a �bg , r {r:_j 1 s .c` #ty c sy ' 7 �s i ..a '> f k i^t~ '�- -
4 T .a3 E r I j,,. J.r: t f '' oir: £ f , - ) a •4.. S Sz .: ay •• = C_z y, fir. i 6 a;.z+�.
�'f � � {4 L4! }`"i3.i t�.�y�j.:•i ZrC=..` a..'J a t}i)G._ .'astC �` .',}�*�tY..�-2 ',tyw y« ` �Lt`SS t .'_` .SAY Ti h'rl'•�fi'r.vsj- rts' S'<{< •-,E_'.
.. Y?'1!' A I i Y.y SN-, 1'a4 > Kt J yY at i�`` T�M^S 1 - Y 3 }�
s r 1�^t.y r F! rx �.... t F : ! s._..d„y.t.,tt' fi .. i k t if+r a.. i r j yf -_ y..x'f _
k Y ' ,r.- -, X Fti u,, Std ti e 4 s�...' �r.,i-I,i,k ,...S. '..4 4,r -.?Y r ,•S a 4 r J
�� } �wa� is. `'t� ,r i}¢' f f \ r i! -� .far;,. >+''':�. t{r�'h 7•,;+NS = f. "',.�5, 4. Cr, r 1{ f r
i t kt
2 f n ! tt i a_
.'/' at -- -z S� ! t�.7 r r f s i s f ; '.sd4 tl rr•� 'S.""r"t Y W r _{ :t 'rk,a,,
t d N�� Fv ; r J a t t y t F?,t,R .+�^ ,L A . a.... txw T < it ..f«
-'+ J- - d ° 4 •4' .�.r ia�',t4fi`(fhry v.^r '` '.y.3 s� +,, t
-�.. r r t . % t.„ a ; r?•n yl� T r t.;r< e� i y yS,.> +-.cr '.
March 25 1983 j�i
{ `: i / �A.Jrf�. t t f t TL aIJx F +' .� 3r .'un t^` V > ,• »s�'s y t>Yz' ;k"•uc 2-f? V ' ! -fie t�
1. •• i f tC + rti., ? i; �.. ,: = t" f r ? tz� st f4 a f#a 1 s.t t ,.* S
r 1' < y ,t`. f.: r t r-rr pr r 1 `,Z` .- " z .:- +_ -.' ) .' h ..f'.
q- 3 'K ` \t b f = �' + 3 rii?i^ '',, ` k i _Lw I,,)'+ `�_ �, - L ajt.
�'! ,._I r:t .:� a ki.:4 < a W Y"s�*,,, -.e.6 ; ...,� .1 �""! x -2 �-A f a. i., .'. -.A '''_
The City.of Atascadero _ f;., Ir 't r '' t' s r f F 1 1,- zt�.•arvr
6500 P b , . .t r - , r r r ,, { .
alma Avenue t 3 , w�
> rft 3 �• r` r k r - s FL a
�Atascadero, CA 93422
r.. ; t F i .' .rr t.
. - ..
..1. : The P;tasca . City Council and the Fourth of July Committee r�<
Please be advised, effective this date, the Board of Directors of', t
,�k' the Atascadero Jaycees, by unanimous conse.*it, has dissolved their ! , `,,rfh
g t association with Jerry Pickard and Mike Molina 'as a eats and '� '°5
9 s it
! ...
. �)�st' r, >o.'representatives of the Atascadero Jaycees with regards `to the .� x-
Atascadero Four of July celebration, pursuant to the request of s" `
>t f Jerry P' r .
4 , �- �'`. _. t=x� i.=- r 't ry f t�� r Te ra t i "� 'Y
r' ;}' : -t_. rf rf 14w l.a'• f�`fS{ t^i f t i== 3 .!1a -, f _ ";�hr
i.nc ��
! Y/! ; .+Y.•L > 4� r rf -. 1 r h! L- .T.
♦. r .i .. 5 r't �."Istayi . *,.
= S.+ Tsi=•'.'
it n � < , u X 4= -
,; — b
r
' f J J > i ry
r .ti < $ s J %r r a3 X ti
;J { r' r! s 4 ' i i ti Y .-
ERO JAYCEES _ > : _ �;� v ` 1>::
�, ! \ Yrs
1 �� u
7t i S d f x S :
r s>
r,t f. r j's r„1J'^'...i�'` t - s {C' rtrl4c�,.y''yx x Jjn Yiz-
-'e^� : is �t.. •,.I a.hij .!q )..,a 1 6-fa L°r s wrwh ,{.7.- `!. fa r'.
d t sit
E a a, >/4..`tJ'F'.x rJl Y C > t 4 N r♦ " ; w X } �. ; d Y X{ ,+.
r.t i ` d t .S.. �,.Ls �t F r % fi,�• .' , k :••{• ..fir `'
r t l X t�} r r ..r i 1 Y y r '! ., �_ S �.
t-� r lir 3 r.� ..q. r s :,X t t ,i.= il: .} 1 rs x' - t : --r yf• y r;rr• ✓ -rI,roL ;.
J r x.. .+ F7 rr,s`j t f°..4 4.;a >1 sr. iL r: 7 .r f t e " L'' '
4 r ,•',;.15 �C_: ! htt i ! s ,., x P„, w r f iwt2 t rx �,
• t. + •rf _, r ., gr .r t T „}" S r4, ! Af f :ta:,..s.
.)7 -•r- -:r1 '' . ��„ !' r r�� i;^rr-J r`�5�r? � . 7?' x'` K y•a k�lr�•,•,•�l�tY•f ���. ;" } f E 4i. A `�� . �-.�•c _..1.�
r�, . 1. a1�. { rf[.'K`4''r fi.,. t _- +„� f r $.sv..
C. ,�.Y c^ . , -i;fr ."u`T d T`7t•. }• " .,,, Jr9 ..a;F{�Sr k J °r, rF;Y3r J, t fa y 4
..•y ni i`' . ti X -r ri y r 4 4'.Si L {: .; 3
r '
'Jr.�'+!.} r: t w". G..11t .ta pn-a -ct rhr?`¢.>{ z " F� a: ?.IrR
.= rt J •, > h. t t, - r ry x ,i P/ s. P �y
3z"' r F fed s K Z r r s r Ys"t 4r, r ,r s r ti r,. a as. « t.: fir,; e.;, u-^psc.r *.
s
t:: - r.. is t ..f r s{
t r 4 1 '! Nr , r
+ k "'_ p + {
t
r - r• u y r r q •!
J
-t-
d _ '' r r
r y. f f_
r
! > .
y ��i�4 i
,"
_.
p
y t
r t I
:{i r r R:
.. _ ` a , t
OUTLINE OF PLAN
I. HAVE AN ORD IRAN PASSED THAT GIVES THE LAKE TO THE JAYCEES FOR ONE DAY SO THEY
CAN _CHARGE ADMISSION OF A $1.00 TO $1.50-PER PERSON TO ,SEE THE FIREWOwS
A. SHOW BOW BMRIMES WILL WOM.
1. SENT L=RS TO OOVENOR ETC.
B. SEO[.RITY WMrl N THE LAKE AND AT EACH BARRICADE.
C. SELLING PWrS AHEAD OF TINE FOR ATAS. RESIDENTS:
II. PARKING - CHARE $1.00 TO $1.50 PER VEHICLE
A. DIAL - A - TEE TO SHUITLE
B. LETTERS TO ROPERTY OWNERS
C. LE.= TO SCHOOL DISTRICT
D. NO PARKING AROUSTD THE LAKE AFTER 12:00p.m. FM OWNERS OF RXES IN THAT AREA.'
III, CAR'J I M AT THE LAKE DURING THE DAY
A. SEPERA,TE VICE:GROUPS TO SPONSOR BOOTHS
B. BOXING MAT M
C. YO(NG CH RENS CSS '.
IV. AN ORDINANCE PkSSED THAT NO ALCOHOUIC BEVERGEG"ALLAWED ON THE LAKE PROPERTY.
A. THERE WILL BE BEER BOOTHS ETC. AT THE LATE.
V. FIREWORKS
. 000105
MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL - APRIL 11, 1983 �.
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Volunteer .Coordinating Committee -,Mayor Nelson
Mayor Nelson requested this';matter be continued.
2. Report from 4th of July' Committee - Mayor Nelson
Council did not support the event and has received numerous
` letters against it. Lon Allen requested public opinion.
MOTION: Councilman Mackey moved that there be no organized 4th of
July event at the Atascadero Lake this year. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Stover and unanimously carried.
Helen Watson stated that if conditions of growth or other 'cir
cumstances result in the need to change traditions, then some
traditional activities might have to be discontinued. She opposed
the 4th of July activities. She requested an ordinance be passed
j to eliminate the use of the park after dark.
3. Priority list Mayor Nelson
To be considered with the Capital Improvement Plan.
4. Assessment district procedures - 'Amapoa-Tecorida
Larry McPherson reviewed problems. and recommendations for long-
term and short-term improvements. He stated that he does not feel
there would be a great deal of support from the property owners. for
an assessment district for drainage and that the total cost of a
project to solve the problems would be approximately $1 million.
Mr. Grimes stated that he has seen many failures in approving
assessment districts but that the people involved should petition
to have one in order to assure the Council of a serious commitment
by the people having to bear the. costs.
Doug Lewis stated that long range weather patterns ,are improving
and that this should be considered.
MOTION: Councilman Wilkins moved in favor of an assessment district
if supported by the people with a petition. The motion -was
seconded by, Councilman Stover and unanimously carried.
5. City of Pismo Beach request of support for proposed County-
f wide oil ordinance - continued
�.
-6-
000106
MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL - MAY 24, 1982 -
that
982 that there were other ways of solving the problem than installing a
culvert and sandbagging and named a few.
After consid ration, .the Hallidays asked if they could again ap-
pear before Council - if, after discussing this matter with the City
Engineer, .they were -not satisfiedwith his determination. Council
agreed.
MOTION: Council an Highland moved that the appeal be continued to the
next Council meeting. The motion was 'seconded by Councilman
Nelson and unanimously carried.
4. City At 'orney' s' Report No. 19
Mr. Grimes reviewed his report for Council.
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Ordinance No. 52 amending Section Map 12-0-33 of the Official
Zoning baps of the City of Atascadero by placing certain
propert in the R-4-D Zone - second reading
MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that Ordinance No. 52 be read by
title o 'ly. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson and
unanimo sly carried.
Mayor Wilkin read Ordinance No. 52 .by title only.
MOTION: Councilman Highland moved for the adoption of Ordinance No.
52 and that this constitute the second and final reading.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Stover and carried on
the following roll call vote.
AYES: Councilmen Highland, Nelson, Stover and Mayor Wilkins
NOES: Councilman Mackey
2. Consideration of 4th .of July fireworks display
Mr. Warden sated that Staff had met with representatives of the
Contractor' s Association and"of -the Jaycees. The Contractor' s Asso-
ciation representative stated that they will finance the event and the
Jaycee' s stated that they will post no parking signs, provide two
dumpsters, provide six chemical toilets, provide the fireworks and
everything that oes with that project. The City is being requested
to provide the anpower for traffic and crowd control and fire safety
and for clean-up of the park facilities. It is estimated that the
City's share of th of July activities will be $3,400.
There was considerable discussion among Council members regarding '
this matter with comments. from Bob Sonne, Larry Clark, Charlie John-
son, Herb LaPrad ', _Mr. Handshey, and Howard Marohn. It was noted that
the 'main problem was the fact that there wasn't enough lead time to
develop alternatives to the Jaycee's operation of the event.
00010'
3
MINUTES - ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MAY 24, 1982
MOTION: moved that th
Councilman Nelson a City approve providing all
ie
necessary manpower for traffic control, crowd control and
fire safety. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey
and carried on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen Mackey, Nelson and Stover
NOES: Councilman Highland and.`Mayor Wilkins
D. NEW BUSINESS
1. -Consideration of Five Year Capital Improvement Plan 1982
through 1987
Mr. Warden briefly reviewed the CIP noting that it is a planning
guide and can be changed by Council at any time. It is updated .each
year . Council approval at this point provides Staff guidance for
preparation of the 1982-83 budget.
MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved for approval of the final Capital
Improvement Plan. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Stover and carried with Councilman Mackey voting no.
Councilman Mackey stated that she was not in favor of the plans
to place the Police Department facilities in the Administration Build-
ing,
2. Consideration of Resolution No. 22-82 authorizing execution
of a grant contract with the California Arts Council
Mr. Warden reviewed the request which does not include allocation
of any funds. ;
MOTION: Councilman Highland moved that Resolution No. 22-82 be read
by title only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Nelson .
and unanimously carried.
Mayor Wilkins read Resolution No. 22-82 by title only.
MOTION: Councilman Nelson moved for the ,approval of Resolution No.
22-82 providing no funds were being committed from the City
of Atascadero. The motion was seconded by Councilman Mackey"
and unanimously carried.
3. Annual ratification of the Joint Powers Agreement creating
the San Lus Obispo. County Area Council of Governments and the
Regional Transporation Planning Agency Annual Work Program
for Fiscal Year 1982-83
f Mr. Warden reviewed this matter stating that Council was requested
to ratify the annual agreement with the Council of Governments. He
stated that there were still some problems they were trying to iron
out with regard to getting the agenda to all County City Councils be-
fore a Council of Governments meeting. Another problem was in the
changing of the COG name to San Luis Obispo Cities and Countiare
000108
ITEM NUMBER: D -4
DATE: 05/11/99
n
■ ®o o ® I
CA] F�
City Manager's Agenda Report
Wade G. McKinney
Information Bulletin
A. Falcon Cable= Rate Increase
Falcon Cable intends on adjusting cable rates June 1, 1999. Attached is the information they
have provided.
B. Chicago Grade Landfill
Hoover& Associates,Inc. has advised the City that they have exercised their option to purchase
the landfill. There is no action required by the Council. Hoover does not anticipate any change
in operation.
C. Y2K Update
Increased knowledge of the Y2K problem and appropriate solutions have spread throughout most
of our community. City Staff initially created a strategy to identify and assess the potential Y2K
related impacts throughout the organization. An inventory of all equipment was completed early
in the year. Staff has now prioritized the information identifying the "mission critical
equipment.
Most equipment and software has been determined compliant. Only four priority one areas were
determined non-compliant. Those are:
CLETS Databases. While the City's hardware and software are compliant, many of the
databases included in the statewide system are not.
LEADS Database. A new server will be in place within one month,purchased from grant
funds.' The software is planned to be released October 15'.
Motorola 911 Call System. Motorola is installing the upgrade at no cost to the City to be
complete by the end of September.
Heart Monitors. The upgrade of the two.monitors will be complete in two weeks at a
total cost of$90.
000109
ITEM NUMBER:___,!!-- 4
DATE: 05/11/99
There are a variety of issues like power and telephones over which the City has no control.
These areas are constantly being monitored and contingency plans are being developed. The San
Luis Obispo County Action Alliance is about to kickoff their awareness campaign. This will
provide an additional avenue for community members to become informed.
A Employee Update
Janet Dishen Temp Support Services Tech Hired 4/21/99
Steve Knuckles Fire Engineer/Paramedic Resigned 4/30/99
Kelly Welsh Support Services Technician Hired 4/29/99
Chris Prewitt Temp Aquatics Program Coor Hired 4/28/99
000110
FALCON CABLE SYSTEMS
7555 San U is Avenue•Atascadero,CA 93422
(805)466-3040•FAX(805)466-9659
EI�/ED .
Falcon. = APR 2 9
w�
!A711"ADER0 CITY MANAGER "
Wade McKinney April 27, 1999
Atascadero City Manager
6500 Palma Ave.
Atascadero,Ca. 93422
Dear Mr. McKinney:
Cable television continues to be a valuable source of entertainment and information for all ages,providing many
programming options. Up fortunately,the challenges facing our business and our costs of providing cable services
continue to increase.
I am writing today to give you notice that Falcon will be adjusting our rates in Atascadero,effective June 1, 1999.
We are making the adjusitments in order to keep up with increases in programming,equipment and other external
costs. Following FCC guidelines,we have calculated the new rates that allow for the recovery of these increased
expenses.
A copy of the customer notification is enclosed which outlines the changes to be made,along with a rate card,
channel lineup,franchise information and sample copies of value-added coupons. We know that the need for rate
increases is not easily understood and accordingly want to do what we can to help our customers better understand
our business and get the most from their entertainment dollars.
If you have any questions about our rate adjustments and/or the enclosed materials,please do not hesitate to contact
me.
Sincerely,
Richard Korwes
Regional Manager
Enclosures
000111
Your Ac ass to Entertainment, Information and Beyond"
SLO610-8751/1200/10-Atascadero,CA If you have any comments or concerns about changes in rates or services,please
contact our local office at 805-466-3040;we would like to hear from you. Your comments and concerns can also be directed to a
local franchising authority within 90 days of these changes. The local franchising authority is: the City of Atascadero,6500
Palma,Atascadero,CA,93422.
Falcon-
April 30,1999
Important Rate Information.
Dear Valued Falcon Customer.
Falcon Cable TV takes great pride in providing you with some of the finest and diverse cable entertainment possible.
translates into a dazzling world of news,entertainment and information right at your fingertips-twenty-four hours a
Over the past year we have worked hard to'improve the quality of service we offer and provide the programming you want.In
1999 we are continuing with our on-time service guarantee-assuring you quality,on-time service calls or you receive a$20
credit toward your bill. We will also continue our excellent customer service standards where you receive personalized_and
prompt help from our friendly staff.
While Falcon Cable TV continues to provide you with exceptional value,both in quality and diversity,our costs of providing
cable services continue to rise. Some of these costs must be passed onto our customers if we are to maintain the high quality
programming that you deserve.
The FCC adopted rules that allow cable operators to adjust their rates for regulated products and services on an annual basis to
recover increased costs due to inflation and increases in programming,equipment and other external costs. Accordingly,we
plan to adjust our rates as outlined below. Our new rates are scheduled to be effective on June 1,-1999—subject to the local
regulatory process,and will be reflected on the first billing statement you receive after that date..
Product/Service Old Rate New Rate- Change SS
Basic Service 19.03 19.59 56
Tier Service 9.75 9.68 -.07
SatPac I Service 6.25 6.25 00
Home Box Office 11.95 11.95 00
Showtime 11.95 11.95 .00
The Movie Channel 11.95 _ 11.95 .00
Cinemax 11.95 11.95 .00
For your information,a copy of our channel lineup and a complete rate card are included with this mailing. We've also.
included a variety of valuable coupons worth up to$50.00 in savings. Thanks again for being a part of the Falcon Cable TV
family. Throughout the years,the support and loyalty shown by our customers has enabled us to expand and improve service
and to satisfy your entertainment and information needs. We look forward to serving you for years to come. If you have any
questions about your service,please do not hesitate to contact urs. Or visit our website at www.falconcable.com
Sincerely,
Richard Korwes— Regional Manager
SLO610-8751/1200/10-Aftmdero,CA
000112
Your Access to Entertainment, information and 84%9 9Er PRINT OF FORM SL0610
SLO610B-8751/1200/10 Atascadero,CA
As a cable customer,you o Nn the wiring inside of your home. If damage to this wiring occurs,you can either hire an electrician or
Falcon Cable to repair your inside wiring. Falcon's hourly service rates will now be comparable to an electrician's.
RATES
BASIC $19.59
EXPANDED TIER (_ 9.68
SATELLITE PACKA E 1 (+) 6.25
BASIC ON ADDITIO L OUTLET 0.00
INSTALLATION/SER ACE(per hr.) 45.00
INSTALL MATERIAL (if any) At Cost
REMOTE 0.21
ADDRESSABLE CONVERTER 2.24
RADIO SERVICE 1.95
VIDEO CONTROL CENTER 0.50 -
ADDRESSABLE WH LE HOUSE OPTION 6.95
LATE PAYMENT FEE 4.75
CABLE PROGRAM GUIDE 1.75
RETURNED CHECK FEE 10.00
LOSTISTOLEN CONVERTER EQUIP 250.00
LOST/STOLEN REM TE 25.00
PREMIUM SERVICES(')
CINEMAX 11.95
HBO 11.95
THE MOVIE CHANNEL 11.95
SHOWTIME 11.95
PAY PER VIEW MOVIE 3.95
All Broadcast TV stations carried on a channel higher than 13 can only
be received via cable throu h a converter box,unless you have a cable-
ready TV set. Converter boxes are available for rent at the low rate listed .
above.
The above rates may not in Jude applicable taxes,fees and assessments
and do not include franchis a fees of 5%of your total bill. Any such
amounts will be itemized on your bill.
SAMPLE PRINT OF FORM SL610B
1
a .nJ 111eJ601d IsOH Al. S,u0018-4 .ce ao 0� Ab01 II e
C)
OVOE-99V-508-
:-11V0 r301AH3S aOimoisn,aoi
�g Puo(ag PUB u011eiu101ul'Iuawwe>JaIu3 01 ss=V moA
UO38:1 U
SLO01 CHANNEL LINE-UP: FALCON CABLE TV-Atascadero, CA
2 KCOY-TV 12-CBS Santa Maria,CA 15 ARTS&ENTERTAINMENT = 29 VH-1
3 KEYT-TV 3-ABC Santa Barbara,CA 16 THE LEARNING CHANNEL _ 29 COMEDY CENTRAL
4 KSBY 6-NBC San Luis Obispo,CA + 17 THE DISNEY-CHANNEL = 30 CNBC
5 KTLA5-IND/WBN Los Angeles,CA + 18 SPEEDVISION 31 NICKELODEON
, 6 LOCAL-Community Access * 19 SHOWTIME _ 32 ESPN
6 CALIFORNIA CHANNEL * 20 CINEMAX 33 USA NETWORK
7 FOX FAMILY CHANNEL * 21 HBO + 34 THE DISCOVERY CHANNEL
8 KCET 28-PBS Los Angeles,CA * 22 THE MOVIE CHANNEL 35 TNT
9 KCAL 9-IND Los Angeles,CA + 23 BRAVO- 36 MTV'
10 C-SPAN * 24 VIEWER'S CHOICE 1-PPV 37 KTAS 33-UNIVSN San Luis Obispo,CA
11 KKFX 11-FOX Santa Barbara,CA = 25 CNN * 80 PLAYBOY
12 QVC = 26 THE NASHVILLE NETWORK
13 KADY-TV 63-IND/UPN Oxnard,CA = 27 AMERICAN MOVIE CLASSICS
14.WTBS 17-IND Atlanta,GA = 28 LIFETIME
Skalcon Tier(_)Sat Pae 1(+)Premium/PPV(•)
Your Access to rntertain�M,IMormatlon and Beyond- -
epinE) WBJBOad IsOH neje s,uo0ls-A a9pa0 01 AV00l 1183
OV08-99V-908- 1
:11V0 '301AH3S IJ3WOlsno ao:j
ra PuoAag pue U01.3ewJo)ui'3u9wu1e1J01u3 03 ssaosy moA
U0318A
SLO01 CHANNEL LINE-UP: FALCON CABLE TV-Atawadero, CA
2 KCOY-TV 12-CBS Santa Maria,CA 15 ARTS&ENTERTAINMENT = 29 VH-1
3 KEYT-TV 3-ABC Santa Barbara,CA 16 THE LEARNING CHANNEL _ 29 COMEDY CENTRAL
4 KSBY 6-NBC San Luis Obispo,CA + 17 THE DISNEY-CHANNEL 30 CNBC
5 KTLA5-IND/WBN Los Angeles,CA + 18 SPEEDVIS!ON 31 NICKELODEON
6 LOCAL-Community Access * 19 SHOWTIME = 32 ESPN
6 CALIFORNIA CHANNEL * 20 CINEMlJC 33 USA NETWORK
7 FOX FAMILY CHANNEL * 21 HBO + 34 THE DISCOVERY CHANNEL
8 KCET 28-PBS Los Angeles,CA * ' 22 THE MOVIE CHANNEL 35 TNT
9 KCAL 9-IND Los Angeles,CA + 23 BRAVO- 36 MTV,
10 C-SPAN * 24 VIEWER'S CHOICE 1-PPV 37 KTAS 33-UNIVSN San Luis Obispo,CA
11 KKFX 11-FOX Santa Barbara,CA = 25 CNN * 80 PLAYBOY
12 QVC = 26 THE NASHVILLE NETWORK
13 KADY-TV63-IND/UPN Oxnard,CA = 27 AMERICAN MOVIE CLASSICS o��l�
14 WTBS 17-IND Atlanta,GA = 28 LIFETIME -
Falcon Tier(-)Sat Pac 1(+)Premium/PPV(•)
Your Access to Entertainmerrt,Information and 8eyondr. - _.