Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 04/27/1999 *PUBLIC REVIEW COPY Please do not remove from counter ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY,APRIL 27, 1999 City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue, 4"'floor Atascadero, California CLOSED SESSIO 6:30 P.M.: 1) Conference with negotiator over real property. (Govt. Code 54956.8) Negotiator: City Manager Wade McKinney Property: APN#028-092-009, #056-322-010, and#056-322-011. Negot ations will include price and/or terms of payment. 2) Conference with legal counsel -Anticipated litigation(G.C. Sec. 54956.9(b)) Significant exposure to litigation : McFadden& Baker v. City of Atascadero 3) Conference with labor negotiator(Govt. Code Sec. 54957.6) Agency Negotiator: City Manager Employee organizations: Department Heads,Mid-Management/Professional, Confidential, Atascadero Fire Captains, Atascadero Firefighters, Service Employees Intl. Union Local 620, Atascadero Police Assoc. • REGULAR SESSION, 7:00 P.M.: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council Member Clay ROLL CALL: Mayor Johnson Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide Council Member Clay Council Member Lerno Council Member Luna APPROVAL OFA NDA: Roll Call PRESENTATIONS: 1. Economic Vitality Corporation Update - Presid nt/CEO David Spaur 2. Service Award - Steve Knuckles COMMUNITY FORUM: (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wanting to address the Council on any matter not on this agenda and over which the Council has jurisdiction. Speakers are limited to five minutes. Please state your name and address for the record before making your presentation. The Council may take action to direct the staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda) COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: (On their own initiative, Council Members may make a brief announcement or a brief report on their own activities. Council Members may ask a question for clarification, make a referral to staff or take action to have staff place a matter of business on a fixture agenda. No formal action by the Council will be taken unless an item is identified on the Agenda.) A. CONSENT CALENDAR: Roll Call (All items on the consent calendar are considered to be routine and non-controversial by City staff and will be approved by one motion if no member of the Council or public wishes to comment or ask questions. If comment or discussion is desired by anyone, the item will be removed from the consent calendar and will be considered in the listed sequence with an opportunity for any member of the public to address the Council concerning the item before action is taken) 1. Joint City Council / Planning Commission / Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes - March 30, 1999 - (City Clerk recommendation Approve the Joint City Council / Planning Commission / Parks & Recreation Commission minutes of March 30, 1999) [Marcia McClure Torgerson] 2. City Council Minutes - April 13, 1999 - (City Clerk recommendation: Approve the City Council minutes of April 13, 1999) [Marcia McClure Torgerson] 3. Weed Abatement Program -Fiscal Impact: None - Costs involved are recovered through the fee charged to parcels abated by the city contractor (Staff recommendation: Council adopt Resolution No. 1999-017, declaring-vegetative growth and/or refuse a public nuisance, commencing proceedings for the abatement of said nuisances, and placing all abatement fees on the San Luis Obispo County special tax assessment for the fiscal year 1999-2000 tax roll) [Mike McCain] 4. Establishment of No Parking Zone - Palma Avenue from the intersection with Rosario 280 feet to the north - Fiscal Impact: $400.00 (Staff recommendation: Council adopt Resolution No. 1999-021 establishing a No Park Zone on Palma Avenue, from the intersection with Rosario 280 feet to the north) [Brady Cherry] 5. Installation of Stop Sign - Los Gatos Avenue at Flores Avenue -Fiscal Impact $200.00 (Staff recommendation: Council adopt Resolution No. 1999-020 authorizing the installation of a stop sign on Los Gatos Avenue at the intersection with Flores Avenue) [Brady Cherry] 2 6. 2-Hour Parkin Zone - El Camino Real from Century Plaza to East Mall - Fiscal Impact: $200.00 (Stajf recommendation: Council adopt Resolution No. 1999-019 designating a portion of El Camino Real as a 2-Hour Parking Zone) [Brady Cherry] 7. Traffic Wgy I Route 101 Interchange PSR Consultant Services Agreement - Fiscal Impact: $75, 00 (Staff recommendation: Council authorize the Mayorto enter into an agreement wilh Omni-Means, Ltd. To prepare a Project Study Report for the Traffic Way /Route 101 Interchange) [Brady Cherry] B. PUBLIC HE RINGS: None C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. Paloma Creek Park Food Concessionaire Agreement - Fiscal Impact: $1,500-2,000 in revenue per year (Staff recommendation: Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Karen Estrada of Atascadero, to operate a concession stand a Paloma Creek Park) JBrady Cherry] 2. Amendment to Contract between the Cily of Atascadero and the California Public Employees' Retirement S stem - Fiscal Impact: None (Staff recommendation: 1. Council adopt Resolution No. 1999-024, giving Notice of Intention to amend the Contract between the City Council of the City of Atascadero and the Board of Administratio of the California Public Employees' Retirement System, and 2. Council adopt Ordinance No. 358, on first reading by title only, authorizing the Mayor to execute an amendment to the contract between the City Council of the City of Atascadero and the Board ofAdministration of the California Public Employees'Retirement System) [Wade McKinney] 3. Road Abandonment #99001 - Portion of San Gabriel Road (Larsen Family Trust) - Fiscal Impact None (Staff recommendation: Council adopt Resolution No. 1999-022 approving abandonment of a portion of San Gabriel Road, RA #99001) [Paul Saldana] 4. Information Bulletin D. COMMITTEE REPORTS (The following represent standing committees. Informative status reports will be given, as felt necess 'ry.): 1. S.L.O. Council of Governments/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority 2. Finance Committee 3. Water Committees A. SLO County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Water Resources • Advisory Committee B. Nacim'ento Water Purveyors' Contract Technical Advisory Committee C. North County Water Forum 4. Integrated Waste Management Authority 5. North County Council 3 6. Air Pollution Control District 7. County Mayor's Round Table 8. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors 9. City/ Schools Committee 10. Economic Opportunity Commission E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: 1. City Council 2. City Attorney 3. City Clerk 4. City Treasurer F. ADJOURNMENT: THE CITY .COUNCIL WILL ADJOURN TO THE NEXT REGULAR SESSION SCHEDULED ON MAY 11, 1999: Please note: Should anyone challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this Agenda in court, that person may be limited to raising those issues addressed at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public hearing. 4 City of Atascadero WEI COME TO THE ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING • GENERAL INFORMATION The City Council meet' in regular session on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber of City Hall. Matters are considered by the Council in the order of the printed Agenda._ Copies of the staff repc rts or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk(Room 208),and in the Information Office(Room 103), available for public inspection during City Hall business hours. An agenda packet is also available for public review at the At scadero Library,6850 Morro Road. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Manager's Office, (805) 461-5010,or the CityClerk's Office, (805)461-5074. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service. TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS Members of the audien a may speak on any item on the agenda. The Mayor will identify the subject, staff will give their rep rt, and the Council will ask questions of staff. The Mayor will announce when the public comment pe iod is open and will request anyone interested to address the Council regarding • the matter being consk ered to step up to the podium. If you wish to speak for, against or comment in any way: • You must approach the podium and be recognized by the Mayor • Give your name and address • Make your statement • All comments should be made to the Mayor and Council • All comments limited to 5 minutes(unless changed by the Council) • No one may speak for a second time until everyone wishing to speak has had an opportunity to do so, and no one may speak more than twice on any item. The Mayor will announce when the public comment period is closed,and thereafter,no further public comments will be heard by the Council. TO SPEAK ON SUBJECTS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA Under Agenda item," OMMUNITY FORUM",the Mayor will call for anyone from the audience having business with the Council to: • Please app oath the podium and be recognized • Give your ame and address • State the n iture of your business This is the time items riot on the Agenda may be brought to the Council's attention. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for Community Forum(unless changed by the Council). TO HAVE ITEMS PLACED ON AGENDA All business matters to,appear on the Agenda must be in the Office of the City Manager ten days preceding the Council meeting. Should you have a matter you wish to bring before the Council, please mail or bring a written communication to the City Manager's office in City Hall prior to the deadline. ITEM NUMBER: A 1 DATE: 04/27/99 MINUTES CITY OF ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION ARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION JOINT WORKSHOP Tuesday, March 30, 1999, 7:00 p.m. City Hall, Rotunda Room 4th floor Mayor Johnson called the workshop to order at 7:00 p.m. and Chairman Butz led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Council Member Clay Commissioner Jeanes Commissioner Kock Council Member Lerno Commissioner Bentz Commissioner Herron Council Member Luna Commissioner Eddings Commissioner Dempsey Mayor Pro Tera Arrambide Commissioner Fonzi Commissioner Kudlac Mayor Johnso ri Commissioner Zimmerman Vice Chairman Hood Vice Chairman Clark Chairman Butz Chairman Carden All the Council Members and Commissioners listed above were present. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Roll Call MOTION and second to approve the agenda. Motion passed unanimously by a voice vote. JOINT CC/PC/PRC 03/30/99 000001 Page 1 of 4 ITEM NUMBER: A�- 11 DATE: 04/27/99 V. COMMUNITY FORUM: Eric Greening, 6600 Lewis Ave., gave the Council and Commissioners his opinion for the timeline of the progress on Stadium Park. He suggested that there should be one opinion with a unified plan. Rush Kolemaine,P.O.Box 1990, suggested that the Council accept public comment on each item during this meeting. VI. WELCOME: Mayor Johnson welcomed the.Commissioners and thanked them for attending. VIL INTRODUCTION OF COUNCIL MEMBERS/COMMISSIONERS: City Manager Wade McKinney explained how we see ourselves and how others see us. He then asked the workshop to break up into pairs with someone they don't know well and interview them. Each member was to ask the other the following 3 questions: 1. Personal background. 2. Why did you become involved in City government? 3. Give an example of some action you are proud of that your Council/Commission achieved? When they came back together, they introduced each other to the rest of the members. VIII. THE ROLE OF THE COMMISSIONS IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT: Community and Economic Development Director Paul Saldana explained the role of Commissions in local government. He explained that the Planning Commission gives advice to the Council on land use issues. The Parks and Recreation Commission advises the Council on park issues and recreation matters. Community Services Director Brady Cherry explained that the role of staff is similar to the role of Commissioners in the fact that they advise the Council. The staff serves as a liaison to the Commissions and Council. He stated that staff's role is to bring the best information with alternatives to the Commissions and Council for them to make the best decision. IX. EXPECTATIONS AND NEEDS: The Council and each Commission were asked to list their expectations of the other body. JOINT CC/PC/PRC 03/30/99 000002 Page 2 of 4 ITEM NUMBER:—A - 1 DATE: 04/27/99 X. PRESENTATION OF EXPECTATIONS AND NEEDS: Planning Commission s Consideration and review of recommendations by commission ♦ Communication c f short and long term goals of Council and priorities of those goals ♦ Vision of commu ity ♦ Updates of what flie Council is doing ♦ Council recognize work of the Commission ♦ How do goals relate to general plan ♦ Provide more information on City finances, directions and activities ♦ Can we call Council members?Can we communicate to council.at meetings? ♦ Joint sessions on major items where Commission is providing advice on the item Parks and Recreation Commission ♦ Would like to know the Council prioritizes Parks and Recreation services ♦ How seriously does the Council take Commission input? ♦ Re: communication, Does the Council value diversity of opinion? ♦ Hold/Continue annual Commission workshop Need Feedback ♦ Suggest Commission input on budget development ♦ To share Commission goals with Council and receive comment, direction if applicable Would like Council attendance/participation in program events & services ♦ Encourage direct erson to person dialogue (ALA George Beatie) when appropriate ♦ Become informed about Parks and Recreation issues and services—proactive ♦ Understand that the Commission sometimes plays and advocacy role ♦ Continue mutual respect and civility Council ♦ Take staff positio interface with public input as issue comes to Council ♦ Ability to see broader public concerns ♦ Critical thinking ♦ Balanced thinking ♦ Do homework ♦ Open minded about issues ♦ Be able to accept a Council vote that overturns a Commission recommendation ♦ No surprises ♦ Not counting votes—bring best recommendation from their perspective ♦ Treat public and staff in a respectful manner ♦ Give staff a heads up on questions that will be asked at meetings (to get more thorough answer) ♦ When there is an issue with Council, ask for a meeting to,resolve the issue. JOINT CC/PC/PRC 03/30/99 000003 Page 3 of 4 ITEM NUMBER: A 1 DATE: 04/27/99 XI. COMMUNICATION ISSUES: City Manager Wade McKinney explained that the City Council is responsible for setting policy and the staff handles the day to day tasks and makes recommendations to the Council. XII. DISCUSSION OF STRAGEGIC PLANNING ISSUES Wade explained the Community Survey and reviewed the City Council's Strategic Planning summary. (see attached) XIII. ADJOURNMENT: 9:00 p.m. The Council adjourned at 9:37 p.m. to their next scheduled regular meeting on April 13, 1999, the Planning Commission will adjourn to their next scheduled regular meeting on April 6, 1999 and the Parks and Recreation Commission will adjourn to their next scheduled regular meeting on April 15, 1999. ` MINUTES PREPARED BY: Marcia McClure Torgerson, City Clerk ATTACHMENTS: City Council Strategic Planning Workshop notes, February 1999 JOINT CC/PC/PRC 03/30/99 000004 Page 4 of 4 City of Ataseadero psi In m ;a 1913 1978 City Council Strate ic PlanningWo,rkshop February 16 & 179 1999. 000005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Page 1 Workshop Goals Page 1 Leadership Styles Page 2 City Council's Review of Current Priorities Page 2 Expectations for the Workshop Page 5 Overview of City Operations Page 5 What is going well with the City? Page 6 Review of Operational and Council Policies Page 7 What areas/issues would we like to improve*on? Page 7 Develop/reaffirm the Council's Vision for Atascadero Page 8 Identify the priority issues Page 9 Action Plans Page 11 0600% City of Atascadero City Council Strategic Plannin Workshop 1999 Introduction The City Council i tiated a Strategic Planning approach to the City operations. in 1997. The Council participated in a goals workshop outlining the priority issues facing Atascadero early in 1997. Following the appointment of a new City Manager August 1997, one of the identified goals, the Council d the new Manager participated in a one-day workshop. In early 1998 the Council and Manager participated in a Strategic Planning workshop facilitated by David Jones. In this workshop the Council began to articulate a vision for Atascadero and establish priorities to guide the operating departments. This was the first time Council priorities were the foundation of the Annual Operating Budget. The Council made a commitment to annually update and revise the City's Strategic Plan. The 1999 Strategic Planning Workshop was held February 16`h. and 17`h. This year's workshop was different than t ie first year in that it was facilitated by the City Manager and included presentations by eac of the operating departments. The City Manager filled a dual role, both as a participant and fa ilitator. In several areas the meeting was facilitated by Assistant City Manager Greg. reg Gre son to allow the City Manager to more fully participate. These notes represent the discuss on of the workshop. Attached at the back of this report are several sections that include handout used at the meeting and the information used by the operating departments Workshop Goals The workshop goals were: ❑ Update the C uncil on the issues in the departments. ❑ Review the Vision for Atascadero and make any refinements necessary. ❑ Review the C ouncil priorities and make any refinements necessary. ❑ Continue to develop a leadership team. ❑ Review issues within the City operation creating a greater understanding and gaining Council feedback. ❑ Identify leadership styles and develop a greater understanding of the styles of each team member. Mike Arrambide, Jerry Clay, Ray Johnson, Ken Lerno, George. Luna and Wade McKinney attended the workshop. City Clerk Marcia Torgerson and Assistant City Manager Greg Greeson . also attended the workshop and assisted facilitation and taking notes. The group established several ground rules to help facilitate the experience. They were: ❑ Bring an ope mind. ❑ Concentrate on listening, as well as participating. o Share your ic.eas and comments. ❑ Be responsible for the team and our product. ❑ Have Fun 000007 Leadership Styles Each member of the team has completed the LIFO6instrument. The leadership styles were discussed and information about dealing with one another was reviewed. Attached.in Appendix A is a handout providing additional information about the styles. The styles for the members were: ❑ Mike Supporting-Giving(29);Under.Stress - Conservative-Holding v Jerry-Supporting-Giving (33);Under Stress Controlling-Taking ❑ Ray-Adapting-Dealing (32);Under Stress—Adapting-Dealing - ❑ Ken—Supporting-Giving (29);Under Stress—Controlling-Taking ❑ George—Adapting-Dealing(33); Under Stress-Supporting-Giving City Council's Review of Current Priorities What have we accomplished since our 1998 workshop? DOWNTOWN ACTION PLANS a ..3. .:AC7'IONS_ Al�l,,k�� . .. _ ,_. Within 60 days prepare history of downtown-what we A report was presented to the Council on did and didn't do. April 9, 1998. Within 30 days tell us what the planning cycle is for. A report was submitted-to Council and a General Plan complete review of downtown element and how we get Amendment was initiatd. ' started. Complete report on redevelopment authority. Council reviewed the report and initiated the process to establish a redevelopment project area. IM e ADDITIONAL'ACTIVITIE$_ Hosted the National Main Street Executive Director for community meeting. Worked with BIA to reorganize the District and Board. Worked with BIA on downtown Christmas lighting project. Developed marketing information for potential downtown clients. Staff will attend the annual conference for the International Conference of Shopping Centers. Council adopted an investment incentive strategy'with priority on Downtown assistance. Cal Poly planning classes are assisting with data collection for reviewing the Downtown Element of the General Plan. Staff have worked with Carlton Hotel owners on revised plans and CDBG funding. Redevelopment Agency is being developed to target downtown. 000008 2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Community Development department is having strategic Plan assembled and circulated to Council. planning session(3/5)and will give results to Council for comment. Joint City Council&Planning Commission meeting Joint Meeting held 3/31/98.. Additional Joint Meetings 3/31. scheduled: x FAQ . DDITIONAL ACTIVITIES .. �," �` a. . _ . . , ._ _ Established written procedure for CEQA activities. Established consistent plan check procedure through service contract. Review and update fees. Provide staff training. Conduct educational community workshops on City requirements. Create new permit forms. ` Review and update Tree Ordinance. Consolidate General Plan policies in one document. COMMUNITY RELATIONS - CITIZEN PARTICIPATION ACTIN PLANS ....; Developing a community vision with the widest possible Staff researched various Vision projects conducted in community involvement. California. Staff received proposals to conduct a project. Funding was not included in the annual budget. Staff is working on building the necessary internal competencies to support such a project. Wade develop options/proposal within budget process Proposals were reviewed and not included in the annual cycle. budget. Milestone is budget process April. Milestone met. ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES 'A Q, , fr Staff have met with a variety of groups and individuals to discuss a community process and gain feedback regarding community priorities. Staff have met with potential private sponsors of a community process for support. Staff has obtained additional proposals for a strategic planning process. The Police Department is scheduling a Citizens Academy. 000009. COMMUNITY RELATIONS-MEDIA AND PUBLIC RELATIONS WINES 00- I) X Communications plan with media and public relations. "Media Guidelines"was developed and training was provided to key staff. Whom-needs to be a city manager/mayor/council plan. Information included in Media Guidelines. . Positive things we.have come up within this meeting All departments regularly send press releases to local need to come out in an immediate press release. media. Need repetition/consistency. City Manager distributes a Community Report and Report to Employees. City Manager contributes a monthly article to the Chamber of Commerce Newsletter. City officials participate in speaking opportunities. An information booklet.regarding Redevelopment was distributed. The City has developed a web site-and circulated e-mail addresses. The Police Department held an open house. FUNDING CITY SERVICES ACTION PLANS .. . ACTIONS,TAKEN a . Strategy outlining these programs within next 45 days Financial strategy was submitted to Council on June 9, prepared by Wade. 1998. ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES City has participated with the League and State in legislative activities. City has initiated the process of implementing a new computer system. Management team is researching service levels and will present them to the Council at 1999-2000 Strategic Planning Workshop. Staff developed road report. Strategic plans were developed in most departments. Staff and Council have been contacting local businesses in a retention/expansion effort. The City has initiated a redevelopment project area. Generalized information has been circulated through media and special reports. Staff reviewed the City's current debt issuances and refinanced the Factory Outlet assessment district. The City adopted an Incentive Policy. 000010 4 Expectations for the Workshop The City Manag met with each Council Member prior to the meeting.-In this interview, Council members described their expectations for the workshop. ❑ Revisit/Reaffirm our vision o Work from our last plan o Validate the'prior information o Determine our priorities to enable the City Manager to make a work plan ❑ Consider generally a 5 year plan ❑ Review our accomplishments ❑ Have good dialogue ❑ Define more clearly what our vision and_goals mean ❑ Make sure we are on the same track ❑ Discus the General Plan and how we each see it ❑ Discus "Growth"vs. "Smart Growth" o Gain some understanding that we have common goals ❑ Agree to Disagree ❑ Continue to.build respect of one another o Find common ground o Just talk... ❑ Review Council member roles Overview of Citv O Derations The City Managerresented an overview of City operations including a ten year financial forecast (Appendix ). The financial forecast illustrates that funding will continue to be an issue for the City. The current funding does not provide for the operational, capital and reserve needs of the City. In the long term the finances gradually catch up, only assuming no change in the City's operation. The City must continue to focus its efforts on the highest priorities, tailoring the operation and increasing revenues where possible. Currently, funding does not provide for full equipment replacement. Those departments like the Fire Department that have been better . organized, at least for budgeting, have fared well in equipment replacement while others have suffered. The City's financial strategy needs to be strengthened, The City employees need to be a top priority as the City is a service industry whose success and failure rests with its employees. Operationally, the strategic planning model has.been adopted by most of the City departments and there is a new optirnism among employees. There are a variety of essential policies and practices still lacking from the City's operation. These pieces need to be completed quickly as they continue to adversely impact the day to day operations and potential efficiencies. The City Manager needs to focus more time on leadership and community issues, so there needs to be alternatives developed to meet both demands. The City has come a long way with technology. _Every department is now networked and the City is beginning to -,njoy the benefits of technology. There is still a lack of training and several work stations are sti 1 of the 386 variety. There is a web site and its use is being expanded as possible. The City ow has full time technical support. The Y2K issues that face.-us are real and will require a signifi ant commitment of resources through most of the year. 000011 5 The entire personnel area has improved vastly over the last two years,but it has a long way to go.. Hiring procedures have improved and are more formalized. Performance standards have been reaffirmed and motivation tools put into place. Communications have been increased through Interest Based Bargaining, the Atascadero Employee Development Advisory Committee, the i City Manager's Report and the "Management by Walking Around" culture. The City has worked on defining service levels and performance measures, but there is much left to do. Each Department Head made an.informational presentation,the handouts are.included in the Appendix. What is going well with the City? ❑ Employee Morale (from employees and others) ❑ Newly hired employees ❑ Positive direction ❑ Tot lot ❑ Improved management policies and procedures ❑ Positive City image ❑ GIS system ❑ REC program ❑ CAP program ❑ RSVP program' ❑ Fire volunteer program ❑ City wide volunteer program ❑ Cadet program o Completing Capital improvement projects ❑ Orange County settlement ❑ .Redevelopment Plan in progress' ❑ Better accessibility of staff ❑ Fire Department community service ❑ Fire station upgrades ❑ Fire Department training ❑ State Fire Muster in Atascadero ❑ No lawsuit losses ❑ Claims and lawsuits down ❑ Strategic Planning process ❑ Highway 41 realignment progress ❑ Highway 41 drainage ❑ $1.5 M. highway monies ❑ Financial strategy ❑ Financial audit ❑ Timely budget ❑ Public visibility of Department Heads ❑ Department Head teamwork ❑ Overall leadership out of City Manager office ❑ All questions answered-City Manager office ❑ City Council deals with problems well 000bv 6 Review of O eratio ial and Council Policies o Personnel Policies o Personnel will be a top budget priority o The current policies need to be reviewed and updated. o Deal with personnel problems within the department and in a timely manner ❑ A procedure of periodic Performance evaluations should be used d_- Purchasing ❑ "Follow the rules or change them" o Provide b tter financial reporting when available with new computer system. ❑ Conduct of Co it Meetings ❑ Make sure Council votes to continue meeting.past 11:00 p.m. o Hear all Council Members out fully o Council Agendas and Staff Reports. o Include as much information as possible o Use summaries and provide back-up ❑ No late reports o Include fiscal impact ❑ Work to I Lave agendas out by Tuesday , o City Council relations with City Staff. ❑ The Council will route requests and staff contacts through the Manager. ❑ The Manager will route staff through his office. ❑ Council will not request work of staff that requires research ❑ No surprises o Don't shop for votes and Council will respect professional recommendations o City Council relations with each other ❑ Respect differences o No surprises o If Counci Members are invited to something make sure all are invited. o Each Council Member should represent the decision of the Council after the vote is taken The team members agreed that the discussion of operational policies and norms should continue and take in more issues'as the relationship develops. What areas/issues would we like to improve on? ❑ Downtown Redevelopment Plan o Citizen communication.and participation ❑ More press r leases ❑ Improved financial reports (snap-shot vs. detail) o Vision survey o Youth Center-resolve issue o Roads o Repeater—Public Safety o Active Recreation Center, ❑ More information on disk or C.D. or web site ❑ Pavilion parking lot o Lake water quality 000013 ❑ Community Development Department - fill staff positions - review contract issue o Seismic retrofit and physical plant maintenance o Review of internal policies/procedures and processes ❑ Joint uses with Paso Robles,Templeton and County ❑ Presence with State Legislature Community Consensus o Improve City image a Vehicles o .Capital Improvement Projects ❑ Animal control ❑ Police involvement at High School Develop/reaffirm the Council's Vision for Atascadero Social and Cultural Activities/Facilities ❑ Develop the following cultural aspects of community: ❑ Lake Park(5) o Sunken Gardens (4) ❑ City Hall (5) ❑ Downtown(5) o Zoo (5) ❑ Library(5) o Host plays, music, dance;etc.through public/private partnerships (3) > o Parks and facilities creative and attractive(5) ❑ Schools and City integrated to provide services(4) o Recreational opportunities that are financially sound(5) Government o Council and community agree on service levels with an economy to support those levels (5) ❑ Elected officials and City staff work to serve the community(5) ❑ Attitude in government to only spend with a realistic plan(4) ❑ City budget that is sufficient to fund our desired service levels (5) Infrastructure (public facilities like streets and buildings) (3) ❑ Roads and infrastructure in good shape(5) Quality of Life o Maintain rural atmosphere, protect natural environment(5) ❑ Be a place people want to come because of our superior quality of life (5) ❑ Improve the Highway 101 corridor so that it is visually attractive(3) ❑ Atascadero is very distinguishable from other cities (3) o Environmental aspects,natural and manmade,are showcased(4) b Large lot development is the dominant residential style (3) • ❑ Expanded view of"community"to mean more than my backyard(4) 000014 8 Community Development ❑ Insure that General Plan is internally consistent including the Downtown Plan and the Economi Development Plan(5) o Diversified housing mix: entry level, mid-level, high-end interspersed among trees and streams and natural amenities(5) Downtown o Create a Downtown with its own identity that has energy and attracts people (5) o Make Downtown a place where families go to gather(4) ❑ Create a pedestrian friendly area: stores, ice cream shops, antique shops, restaurants etc.,with seating in park areas (5) ❑ Make Downtown a significant place with activities in the Sunken Gardens for childrenand families(5) ❑ Downtown should be fully developed to reflect the community character ❑ Hold community events Downtown(5) Youth ❑ Be a city that supports its youth through a broad range of wholesome development ways, e. . public/privatepartnerships for skate arena, golf, etc., not just publicly provided activities(5) ❑ Recreational needs of youth are met(5) ❑ Educational needs of youth are met(4) ❑ Safety needs of youth are met(4) o Job opportunity needs of youth are met(5) Economic Health o Create jobs that provide "wage earner" salaries, long term, mentally challenging careers tt at allow youth to stay in community(5) o Recruit a d retain the following kinds of businesses: (5) ❑ Clear, attractive and planned hi-tech business parks o Non-polluting businesses consistent with Atascadero environment ❑ Software groups ❑ Management consulting firms ❑ Engineering design firms ❑ Regional headquarters ❑ Expand industrial development to supply jobs (4) o The City financially stable—reserves in good shape (5) . ❑ The maintenance of public facilities(streets,buildings,etc.)funded(5) ❑ Tax base is sales and property tax(4) 000015 9 l Identify the priority issues Priorities with special emphasis ❑ General Plan o Economic Development o Business attraction-recruitment ❑ Business retention o Citizen participation v Downtown ❑ Funding city service Issues Facing City ❑ General Plan ❑ City image o Fiscal stability o Lack of sign ordinance enforcement ❑ Too many used car lots ❑ Lake fireworks show E3 Clean up lake water o Swimming facilities ❑ Improve walking path around Lake ❑ Clean up private property C) Better use of Pavilion ❑ Traffic enforcement ❑ Drug Problems o Code enforcement ❑ Community outreach—vision ❑ Define Downtown o Ball fields ❑ Recreational facilities o Open space o Community survey o Sunken Gardens Master Plan o Develop understanding of sewer issues o Financial reporting o Chamber of Commerce o Youth activities El Capital Improvement Plan .o Carlton Hotel o Reuse existing sites o Diagonal parking on El Camino Real o Employee compensation ❑ Downtown development o Revenue generation/enhancement o Communication equipment ❑ Government efficiency ❑ Streets ❑ .Equipment replacement o Technology in all departments o Unified community goals and vision 000016 10 e ❑ Infrastructure costs—replacement costs ❑ Need more shopping ❑ Public education ❑ Vehicle replacement ❑ Employee training Action Plans ❑ General Plan Action Plan ❑ 1"report Schedule ❑ Work plan to accomplish ❑ To City Council before budget ❑ Budget to determine next step ❑ Economic Development Action Plan ❑ Recruitment Plan—by mid-year ❑ Develop list of preferred businesses by location ❑ Business I etention Plan—survey with business license process ❑ Make dec cion on Economic Round Table ❑ Review E onomic development element of General Plan ❑ Citizen Parti c.ipation Action Plan ❑ Develop survey of citizenry— ❑ Mailing to all residents/businesses ❑ Blank lines ❑ Donesoon ❑ Interir i report back to council on cost,plan and approach ❑ Staff com ile results ❑ Report back to City Council no later than end of year ❑ Downtown Pan ❑ Update D wntown Plan—Staff to develop work plan followed by public hearing ❑ Impleme Downtown Plan ❑ Recruitment/Redevelopment of Downtown businesses ❑ Funding City Services Action Plan ❑ Update financial strategy ❑ Develop I enchmarks to measure services and expenditures ❑ Seek emp oyee input for cost-saving ideas ❑ Review coordination opportunities between departments ❑ Institute legislative program o Update fees ❑ Study cos:s ❑ Stream-line work ❑ Target st fing to high return projects ❑ Stay fiscally conservative ❑ Special Reports 16 Council ❑ Roads ❑ REC Center ❑ Sewer 000017 ITEM NUMBER: A - 2 DATE: 04/27/99 Minutes ATASCADERO CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY,APRIL 130999 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION INTERVIEWS, 6:15 P.M.: 1. Interview candidates 2. Selec by ballot, one citizen for the Parks & Recreation Commission. The City Council interviewed three candidates for the Parks & Recreation Commission: Eric Gobler, Richard Mathews, and James Schmidt. The Council voted to appoint Eric Gobler to the Commission. 3. Intery ew the youth representative candidate. 4. Appoint youth representative to the Parks & Recreation Commission. The City Council interviewed the youth representative candidate, Brian Potter, and appointed • him to the Parks & Recreation Commission. REGULAR SESSION,7:00 P.M.: Mayor Johnson called the Regular Session to order at 7:12p.m., and Mayor Pro Tem Arrambide led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Council Members Arrambide, Clay, Lerno, Luna and Mayor Johnson Absent: None Others Present: City Clerk Marcia Torgerson and City Treasurer David Graham Staff Present: City Manager Wade McKinney, Police Sergeant Jeff Fredricks, Fire Chief Mike McCain, Community Services Director Brady Cherry, Administrative Services Director Rachelle Rickard, Community and Economic Development Director Paul Saldana, Special Projects Coordinator Greg Greeson, and City Attorney Roy Hanley. 00008 APPROVAL OF AGENDA: MOTION: By Council Member Luna and seconded by Council Member Clay to approve the agenda. Motion passed 5:0 by a roll-call vote. PRESENTATIONS: 1. Proclamation: April 18-24, 1999 "Professional Secretaries Week and April 21, 1999 "Professional Secretaries Day." Rose Shapley accepted the Proclamation. She introduced Pat Schulz as the Central Coast Chapter of International Association of Administrative Professionals' incoming Vice President and Bonnie Jordan as the current Vice President and the incoming President. She thanked former Mayor Carden and expressed gratitude to Mayor Johnson, the City Council, and the City Staff for their assistance and participation. Ms. Shapley invited the public, council, and staff to join them at the Atascadero Lake Park Pavilion on Wednesday, April 21, 1999, where Mike McCain will speak on Pride in Professionalism. 2. Proclamation: April 1999 "Alcohol Awareness Month" George Rowland, Chairman of the North County Connection accepted the Proclamation. • 3. Air Pollution Control District - Paul Allan and Robert Carr will report on recent air quality in the North County and Atascadero area. Robert Carr reported to the Council on the impacts of air pollution in our area. He gave an introduction of ozone readings in the North County. Paul Allan explained the handout charts of various tests and analysis (see Attachment A). PUBLIC COMMENT Eric Greening, 6600 Lewis Ave., thanked the APCD representatives for their presentation. He expressed concern with the use of controlled burning and its effect on the pollution rates. Mr. Greening announced that State Air Resources Board will be holding a hearing in SLO on Thursday, April 29, 1999, from 1:00—5:00 p.m. at the County Government Center. Klaus Schumann, Paso Robles, representative with the Green Party, stated that this presentation is a good first step but he would still like the Council to place this issue on their agenda for discussion. Mayor Johnson closed the Public Comment period. CC 04/13/99 000019 Page 2 of 7 4. Atascadero NEttive Tree Association-Members will announce the Festival of the Oaks, to be held on Alril 17, 1999. Cory Meyer,preside t of ANTA announced the Festival of the Oaks celebration form 11:00a.m. —5:00 p.m. at the Atascadero Lake Park. 1 from ANTA invited everyone to attend and Rick Mathews, also y listen to the special guest speakers and join in book signing, etc. Treechy, a.k.a. Eric Greening, the Teaching Tree gave a preview of some of the day's activities along with some information about the oaks that live in this area. Mayor Pro em Arrambide left the meeting as he had a personal commitment. COMMUNITY FORUM: Raymond Jansen, 6655 Country Club Drive, suggested to the members of the press that they include in their articles items brought up during the Community Forum period. He expressed his concerns with Atascadero using redevelopment to improve the community. John Heatherington, 7790 Yseal Ave., spoke in protest of the actions of the Redevelopment Agency. He asked that the meetings for the Agency be held at a reasonable hour instead of after the City Council.meetings. He also expressed concern for the large size of the redevelopment area. Mary Hafler, 5455 B lsa Ave., spoke about her concerns with redevelopment and seconded Mr. Heatherington's requ st to hold meetings regarding redevelopment at an earlier hour. Jennifer Hageman, 8005 Santa Lucia, expressed her concerns with redevelopment. She stated that the public will be in debt as a result of redevelopment and they should be informed. Fred Frank, 3615 Ar illa, stated that he supports the previous three speakers comments as he has similar concerns with the redevelopment of Atascadero. He asked that the Agency hold their meetings either befom the Council meetings or on another day. Eric Greening, 6600 ewis Ave., stated that he agrees with the previous speakers concerning the time of the Redeve opment Agency's meetings. He also expressed his concern with the statement that Atascadero has widespread blight. Klaus Schumann, Pao Robles, read a prepared statement where he warned that in Paso Robles $1.6 million of redevelopment funds were used for infrastructure on Wal-Mart. He urged the Council to use caution. He also expressed his concerns with the increased air pollution in the North County(see Attachment B). Katherine Baker, 6820 Santa Ynez Ave, stated that the newspaper said that the Redevelopment Agency meets after t e regular Council meeting but stated no specific time. She expressed her CC 04/13/99 000020 Page 3 of 7 concern that the Agency was attempting to discourage community involvement by holding the meetings at late hours. John McNeil, 8765 Sierra Vista, read a prepared statement where he suggested the Council and Redevelopment Agency needs to keep the public informed concerning redevelopment by scheduling the Agency meetings at a reasonable hour (see Attachment Q. John McGoff, 9192 Maple St., stated that he opposes the use of eminent domain except in for public uses. He believes that the use of eminent domain is premature. Mr. McGoff expressed that reports given at the Council meetings are not reflective of the concern of those who attend the meetings. Dorothy McNeil, 8765 Sierra Vista, read a prepared statement saying that she agrees the Agency meetings should be held at a more convenient time (see Attachment D). Jerry Taft, 9990 Santa Clara Road, asked for clarification on the issue of eminent domain and who has the authority to use it. City Attorney Roy Hanley stated that the Agency can-have the power of eminent domain but a private party can not. Anita Rouse, 5703 Carrizo Road, the City Clerk read prepared statement into the record where she expressed her opposition to the use of condemnation of private property.(see Attachment E). Mayor Johnson closed the Community Forum period. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS: Council Member Luna thanked the APCD presenters and asked that staff send them a Thank You note that would also ask them to return and talk about findings from public workshops to be held in July. He proposed that we have a public hearing at that time as the representative of the Green Party asked for. He also suggested the RA meetings be before the Council meetings. Council Member Clay questioned the possibility of holding the RA meeting during the City Council meeting. There was Council consensus for staff to look into when the best time to have the RA meeting. Council Member Luna discussed the Department Expenditure Trends - General Funds using overheads. Asked that the Council remember Streets as the number three priority with the approaching of the new budget(see Attachment F). A. CONSENT CALENDAR: Roll Call 1. City Council Minutes - March 9, 1999 - (City Clerk recommendation: Approve the City Council minutes of March 9, 1999) [Marcia McClure Torgerson] CC 04/13/99 000021 Page 4 of 7 2. Cily Council Minutes - March 23, 1999 - (City Clerk recommendation: Approve the City Council minutes of March 23, 1999) [Marcia McClure Torgerson] 3. 1998 Local Law Enforcement Block Grants Pro ram - Police Department is requesting authorization to purchase specialized police equipment using grant funds - Fiscal Impact: Noe (Staff recommendation: Council authorize the Police Department to purchase special police supplies and equipment allocated under the 1998 Local Law Enforcement Block Grants Program) [Dennis Hegwood] Eric Greening pulled Item#A-1. MOTION: Council Member Luna moved to approve items #A-2, 3 and seconded by Council Member Clay. Motion passed 4:0 by a roll-call vote. ITEM#A-1: Eric Greening gave a correction of spelling in the minutes. MOTION: Council Member Luna moved to approve item #A-1 (as amended) and seconded by Council Member Clay. Motion passed 4:0 by a roll-call vote. B. PUBLIC HE RINGS: None C. MANAGEMENT REPORTS: 1. LeaRue of Ca ifornia Cities Annual Conference - Change Date - Fiscal Impact: None (Staff recommendation: Council authorize the Mayor to vote at the Channel Counties Division meet'ng in favor of moving the League of California Cities Annual Conference from October toApril or early May) [Wade McKinney] There was Council consensus to have Mayor Johnson vote on the League Resolution on behalf of the Council. 2. Information Bulletin Wade announced the Community Grant Program/Human Resources Grant Policy the Council approved, applications will be going out this week. When completed applications are returned, they will go to the F nance Committee and they will make a recommendation back to the City Council. CC 04/13/99 000022 Page 5 of 7 D. COMMITTEE REPORTS S.L.O. Council of Governments/S.L.O. Regional Transit Authority Mayor Johnson said they met last week with a request to change the number of supervisors. He explained that due to the lack of a precedent, the request was denied. Also, Cal Trans will be releasing information concerning the Cuesta project. He suggested that it may be helpful to attain a briefing from SLOCOG with Cal Trans. Also, Cal Trans is considering removing vegetation on Highway 101 and replace with concrete barriers. Mayor Johnson requested that Cal Trans speak with the City before action is taken. He stated that Eric Greening has offered to keep tabs on the project. Mayor Johnson also said that the Transportation Development Act Funding and the local transportation fund were each increased for Atascadero by $116,000 for this year. Mayor Johnson suggested that AB521 is fuel tax that Atascadero should track and study the impact. He also commented that AB 102 is a sound wall diversion bill that Atascadero should look at it carefully. He described some of the long-range projects of SLOCOG. Water Committees Council Member Clay reported that the Paso Robles basin study was postponed because Paso Robles now has questions after 2 '/2 years of discussion. In addition he stated that the status of the Naciemento Water Project is up in the air because Paso Robles has at least four Council Members who are not for it. North County Council Mayor Johnson has requested the executive committee meet to discuss the water issue. He asked that if any of Council Members had questions to please present them to him. He also stated that he has heard the possibility of the Salinas Dam vs.Naciemento. Economic Vitality Corporation, Board of Directors Mayor Johnson reported that Dave Spaur would be making a presentation to the Council soon. He invited all Council Members to the EVC meetings. E. INDIVIDUAL DETERMINATION AND/OR ACTION: None F. ADJOURNMENT: May Johnson adjourned the Regular Session to the Redevelopment Agency Meeting at 9:00 p.m. and the Council will reconvene immediately following the Redevelopment Agency Meeting for a Closed Session. CC 04/13/99 000023 Page 6 of 7 CLOSED SESSION: 1. Public Employee Performance Evaluation: City Attorney (Govt. Code §54957) 2. Conference with labor negotiator(Govt. Code Sec. 54957.6) Agency Negotiator: City Manager/Mayor Employee organizations: Department Heads, Mid-Management/Professional, Confidential, Atascadero Fire Captains,Atascadero Firefighters, Service Employees Intl. Union Local 620,Atascadero Sergeants Service Orgn., Atascadero Police Officers Assoc.,Atascadero Public Safety Technicians Orgn. City Manager WadeMcKinney announced that the Council gave him direction. MEETING RECORDED BY: Marcia McClure Tc rgerson, City Clerk MINTUES PREPARED BY: Melanie Whaley CC 04/13/99 00+0024 Page 7 of 7 Attachment: A' Atascadero City Council •"'• Air Resources Board Meeting Date: 4/13/99 ,•�� Alan C.Lloyd,Ph.D. "� �• Chairman •IN Winston H.Hickox 2020 L Street P.O.Box 2815 Sacramento,California 95812 • www.arb.ca.gov Gray Davis Governor Secretaryfor Environmental Protection March 31, 1099 Mr. Robert Carr, APCO San Luis Obispo County APCD 3433 Roberto Court San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-7126 Dear Mr. Cam This is in response to your request that the Air Resources Board(ARB) staff brief you on the impacts of air pollution transported from other areas on ozone concentrations in your District. My staff would be pleased to present preliminary findings of our most recent transport assessments to your Board at its July 28, 1999,meeting. The ARB is required by the Health and Safety code to identify downwind areas in which ozone concentrations are impacted by air pollutants transported from upwind basins or regions.' The code also requires the assessment of the relative contributions of these upwind emissions to downwind ozone concentrations to the extent permitted by available data(Health and Safety Code section 39610 (a) and(b)). The ARB is required to update this assessment at least once every three years (Health and Safety Code 39610 (d)). The first assessment was approved by the ARB in August 1990, and subsequent,triennial updates have occurred in 1993 and 1996. The ARB staff is now preparing the third triennial update. We plan to present preliminary findings at a mid-July 1999 public workshop. The 45-day public comment period for the ARB staff triennial update report will begin in mid-October 1999,and the ARB staff will report on the findings to the ARB at a public hearing on December 9, 1999. The third triennial update will include assessments of the impacts of transported emissions on ozone violations for selected California nonattainment areas including San Luis Obispo County,for the period from 1996 through 1998. The ARB staff will qualitatively define the extent to which ozone violations in receptor areas are the result of air pollutants emitted in upwind areas. The staff will use a suite of spatial and temporal analyses of available meteorological and air quality data to determine the degree of transport. This suite of analyses was described in the first triennial update report; dated June 1993 (I have enclosed a copy). In the current assessment,the ARB staff will analyze new meteorological data, such as surface and aloft winds, and review recent ARB daily.airflow analyses and National Weather Service synoptic weather charts. In addition,the staff will analyze air quality data to determine the spatial and the temporal extents of these ozone California Environmental Protection Agency rnr�0Q25 Printed on Recycled Paper Mr. Robert Carr,APCO March 31, 1999 Page t violations.. The Staff will also compare ozone.precursor emissions in the upwind and downwind. areas. These analyses will identify potential upwind source areas,transport corridors, and relative contributions from upwind areas. We assign the following qualitative descriptors to transport contrib tio-is. A downwind area will be designated as"overwhelmed"by transport if the ozone violati ns are almost exclusively caused by transport of ozone and ozone precursor emissions from upwind areas. A downwind area will be deemed to have"significant"transport impacts if the violations are caused by both local and upwind emissions. A downwind area will be deemed to have "inconsequential"transport impacts if the violations are caused almost eattirely by local missions (with little or no contribution from upwind areas). Because transport impacts are evaluated for individual violation days,.an area can have more than one tr Lnsport classification. For example,the South Coast Air Basin is the source of overwhelming transport into San Diego County on some violation days; on other days, South Coast and San Diego both contribute to ozone violations in San Diego. On still other days, emissions from E an Diego cause the standard to be violated without any contribution from the South Coast AirBasin. Multiple classifications occur due to differing airflow patterns on violation days. If you need further information or have any questions,please contact me at (916) 32 -5350 or Steve Gouze of my staff at(916) 323-6627. Sincerely, Terry McGuire, Chief Planning and Technical Support Division Air Resources Board Enclosures cc: Debora P' pejoy Dennis Wade Steve Go ze 000026 Table 2: Ambient Air Quality Standards W Averagttig f Mme a California StAnaard _ National Standard Pollutant 1 Hour 0.09 ppm ' Ozone 8 Hour s4 � O.OS PPM 8 Hour 9.0PPmPP .. _ 9 m Carbon Monoxide 1 Hour 20 ppm 35 ppm Nitrogen Annual Average 0.0.53 ppm Dioxide 1 Hour: 0.25 ppm ra —.a Annual Average 80 ug/m'(primary) Sulfur 24 Hour 0.04 ppm 0.14 ppm (primary) Dioxide 3 Hour 0.5 ppm (secondary) 1 Hour 0.25. PPm. R� A Annual Geometric Mean 30 µg/m' k • PM,o 24 Hour 50 µg/m' 150 gg/m' u (D -a Annual Arithmetic 50 ug/m' C + 2 " Mean a Annual Arithmetic 15 /m' Mean a !a9 PM2.5 n =a 24 Hours 65 pg/m, Hydrogen Sulfide 1 Hour 0.03 ppm In sufficient amount to reduce the prevailing Visibility 1 Observation visibility to less than ten miles when the relative humidity is less than 70%. 4 000027 m � r •� 0I i ( cc rF --1In � r rJ O U rJ •r O C . c � L N U •� r m a Ln t o • \ = W O C O O P_ O c7 Z 4-3 O V) N a C � C ` W d L WC () Q C — C W V O > •Q •• C L pVp y_ to <. t• 3 C C Q1 > .o 5 S- ! 0 !? • - (15 1 C i Ur t;''-• .a dJra O N C ' O S= > QJ N ra ra S- aj o O CM O ra O a LOS- N ra E O -0Q I d Ln 4-) > N O U p m r (/) O a U N b-ra O S- O •r• ra .r u N •� iro3 N o +-3 N O O c S- < _! S- S- b ra 2 8 Section 2.0 Revision 0 FIGURE 2.0-2 February, 1989 Page 3 of 7 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION AND INCREASES IN SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY .1977 1987 . . PaaoRobl4 Cambria Cayucos ••� \ tAtascadero Morro Bay 4 . Saywood - Ban {... . Loa Osos ...�"^ • Luis .Obispo •�•/� Pismo Beach Arroyo Grande Grover City ' Oceano .4•Nipoma 7 Oot = 50 Peaple .( 1977) CENSUS DIVISIONS 1977 1987 Increase (%) 1 Paso Robias 13,500 29,900 16,400 121 2 Atescadaro 19,400 28,400 .9,000 46 3 North Coast 23,600 33,500' 9,900' 42 4 San LuisObiapo 41 ,800 49,900 ,8, 100 19 Jc San Luis Bay 7, 100 10,600 3,500 49 E7 Arroyo Grande 32,000 46,000 14,OQO 44 TOTALS 137,400 198,300 60,900 44 000029 U e X C`:. r MGN CJ J C+C•] O v^O.-+T Cl)C O C9--f C'•:C`3•:�.-i CO "3 i t XS `1L?M M •L7 CD�CAO 1L7L7<L� 111<M M<Cko1 --oal%J'L7C C� .1=U • S MMMMM MOMMM C•3MMMM C'7Mco)MM MMMMM MM.-4 r-4M M C C•7 C-]C•3 i N C•: C'•7 C•7 C•]c•7 c•] C•]C•I Ca C'•I C•] C•7 r•1 C•7 Ca N c•7 07 Ca C•1 C•] C•7 C•7 C•3 C-1 C-1 C•7 - r2 C w CJ Ur L�M M -.0 Ll,1 C%1 G+. U 6-co Ct I '.m-,o Co[�,O O co C7 CL1 M L7 C^CO t'1 C.-] X } r J.yr - • ¢ G� ¢G CO C•i ci •i ci c-i Co M c=, M C•I C•1 C•7 M M C M C-3 C•1 c•i ci c i C•i M M M c i C•i;-•i c•, to U _p •• M -K-K-< 4C-iC -K-K-'K-K-< -K-K -K -K -K-7;-K -K-YK-r,-K-K -K-K-K--K-K -K C•] -K-K-K r,-K -K-K-K-K-< -K-K-K-K-K -K-K-K-K-K -K-K-K-K-K -K---iC-K-K -K > >•• G � c•7 rr O Cv 413 C•3 Ca C•7 r-+C•7 L7 r•7^,r-i mm M C C M C•7 C•7 r-q Ca.-•4 r'r r-i ra C•7 .. .--i L7 O m _1 aj m . i C-3-4 C•7 C.1 C•7 C•1 07 C•I CO L7 C':r-I.--i M M<,cr M N N r•3 C•7 r-q.t .tri +.-i C•] C•] C•7.t L-) L n C•7 M CU L7 • O .-4 C•1 Cv 01 01 M C•7<kD M M r+c C C 17-V M N C•7 N C•7C. C•7 C•7 Ca .••� - rye 2 C'•3 M c U .J C' G1 M M C•3 m C•1 M C L•71th L-1 C Cl C L7 L7 .?n M M C•7 M M M M C•7 C-7 C•7 M r•I C•1 M O M �. CO L7 Cl)M c 13 M C L)L7 O^.J' L;C Cl)C L-) LP%D L7 M M Cl)M Cl)C L) a'M C•7 M C•I M �• .�G� �, n L7Cl)Cl)r Cl) MU' Ll)I-:ON L7ccc•1< cL7cCM MCl)CL7L7 cL7vMM M C-1 M r. Z 0 %D<co M �:L7 L7.�^.� iii L ^ 7 C•]C L7 L7 L i<C•] CV)M<L7 L7 L7 J CM M M r-=G+ Q r= co L: M u M M LC 7%.o V)1 O L7 L7 M< c C L7 L 2 C.-I C•7, CC c L7 1�c Ca c M C•; _ CIA .7 Ce 'tJCM M' L7O.?1G% oLiCC< L7LZIMM MC<M`. 1�OCCC M C r.GN Z L .. LQ L3 rti �� y M G e Jr _ ELn Q ai SCM M L7tGu^1C% %j-,U') 7 L7U'IDMCI) MMCL71.0 1L1LZL7< M C' .n U 0-. C4 �A'r l'7Cl)M L71 tJ L?1 1 L7<<L7 V' %' V)<M Cd M M t^1 '�^�' 7<< C) . •-+C, •. V) . C r w v¢ o N i� •r+: ^:• +Y� --4 %.:.,L7 M M C G: U-G= %-C n CQ v' Ln`'t C'C•i .-�M m ul!-, '_J• m c M c M 1-4 C17 rn CD O O O -Z 1q,m cli M -NMNC> -.D V) 0) MMM riMCc` 1Cc<Cl) M c .0 CJ7 � m L? S Co LI) G e G'+ L7 M l0. M c-K L7 L7.0\,v' L'3 C M M L7 L7 v'M M ^•I M C':C C' L':r, -K C co C•3 <r,-C> S�-'i U- O -K JI -K C•I� r.-q `r+ Fr LF u, G <:J C•3 C. C•I M-K C C G+ M M M M C M M N C-1 Cl)C•]M< C•I Cl)-K M C•I C•] M GN G'• -I O -K K C•] ¢w M C ^•3 C• C•I rK-K C•1 M L7 M M 1-7 M M M M C•] C•7 C•]CV C•7 M C•I C•7 N .t C•7 C•][N L7 .-1 x O -K -K < Hw = C3 cG J' C3 C•..4 C• C•7 r e.-� C'•3 C•l -r r+rt.-+C.7 .i C.7.y.-�,i .i-�H C•7 .1 C] r M . 01%M 's-+ co G L7 '--v_4 C•3 O :-4 O C r-1 4 C•3 C O*-+.+.; O^.+r••;.-+O . p p. 4 O O -i;--=O M O M co r✓. s C-1 r O O O O r•1 O.-t O.-4 O r-+O .-•1 r-+C.-+r-! r••t r-I C•7.--t O M M to (� Ct7 C_^ G+ XU ,r =L M ¢ [S. C'•3^.]C•7 r-=r-s O.-t C9.-4 O r'•i C•7 ri C4 r-=r-t M r-4 r•+M T� J ai m M ^•I C•]C•I-r-i.t r+ N C•1 .-t C•3 O O C•7 r r C•1 C•7 C•1 r: C•7 C•I.d r t-+ C•7 C•7 C•].-r C•7 r 1 r~C•3 "5 > .7 ^ L7 p r'•t il., .—•_ ^1 C•3 C.]C•7 --I C•7 C•3 C•7 r—r C•3 e--4 O r—t C•3 r-r—<ri M C•] C•I—i.--1 —1 rt Cl C%3 C'-7!7.4 r—i C•3 R.+ O =a O `, M CJ: O H r-I r-!C•7 r•1 C•:M r•7 C•1 C•1 N C•7 C•3 ri C•3 r-c r- :--t C•i CO M r-t %N, .-t r1 M _ Q w T p ^t +� ;.•. r-:C•7 M c*' i LSt 1^,.,!' ON O •-+C•]M C b7 U' co O r-:C•7 C7 C:n t7 r,co n O ' .-+ L'Z X H C� C7 C•7 C.::.• C•1:•:C•1 C•.Cri 000036 COUNT I]DE OZONE TRENDS 1989-199 The following graphs depict ozone trends at six locations within the county for the past ten years (eight years at Paso Robles and Nipomo). Each data bar represents the total number of hours in a given year in which the ozone concentrations exceeded 65 parts per billion. This concentration-level is a useful indicator for trend purposes even though there are no health standards for single-hour exposures to 65 parts per billion of ozone. The location of the Paso Robles monitoring station was changed in 1991. Consequently, data from Paso Robles is incomplete for 1990 and 1991. The Nipomo graph includes data through September 1996 only, (at which time the.station was discontinued). Monitoring resumed at Nipomo in November 1998. Atascadero Paso Robles 1400 1400 1200 1200 CL 1000 c 1000 N tn m 800 4/ 800 ' 0 600 a° 600 ,p 411 10 i H 400 I w 400 I 263 333 721 L 200 - t 201 _ = 200 ; 131 147 0 ! 0 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Morro Bay San Luis Obispo .1400 ' 1400 . a 1200. n 1200 c 1000 a 1000 �. m 800 I m 800 ° 600 i a 600 ! a 400 400 ! L 200200 I 41 13 26 1s 0 1 2 0 S L i 28 20 17 17 24 n 21 46 6 4 0 0i — 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Grover Beach Nipomo 1400 1400 � 1200 ------ a 1200 CL 1000 a 1000in LO i m 800 ( m 800 { 600 �° 600 ° A I 400 400 ° 200200 64A46t 40 7 31 6 9 9 11 10 1 L 42 50 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 .1995 1996 1997 1998 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 9 000031 C O rn rn N CT) � � co Cl O CO i CY) yG O O N Y .a cn .� ' CIO N � ri z rn O rnEl U OUY 0 O7 O ^* C b cz co� N O U L O Ln O U') O N sAep joy ,aagwnu 000032 seouepaeoxEl jejapa.1 lenuuy oW?DtV9 CD O OO O o O O co 11-1. co LO I'll- � N r o 00 . rn rn LOrn - cY) -rn N - CY) Q co Q co m i _ 00 °O a 00 > Q� LO _ co o _ co co O N C6 - co � c ( p T i 00 co - LO O O O o O o O CD O O O O o O O d' N CD co Cfl d- N qdd gg anogV sjnoH auozp s9MI osed 000033 TABLE 1 : Comparison of Daily Max Ozone Hourly Averages on Exceedance, Days At Paso Robles in 1998. Date Paso BkMt Difference 4/21/98 0.097ppm 0.087 0.010 7/7/98 0.1'02ppm 0.082 0.020 7/8/98 0.105ppm 0.084 0.021 7/17/98 0.113ppm 0.099 0.014 7/18/98 0.103ppm 0.101 0.002 7/19/98 0.129ppm 0.099 0.030 8/2/98 0.098ppm 0.092 0.006 8/3/98 0.099ppm 0.085 0.014 8/4/98 0.114ppm 0.093 0.021 8/5/98 0.099ppm 0.104 -0.005 8/11/98 0.100ppm 0.093 0.007 8/12/98 0.109ppm 0.096 0.013 8/22/98 0.100ppm N/A N/A 8/24/98 0.105-ppm 0.085 0.020 8/28/98* 0.114ppm* 0.096* 0.018 . 8/29/98* 0.101 ppm* 0.094* 0.007 8/30/98 0.108ppm 0.103 0.005 9/01/98 0.096ppm 0.089 0.007 9/02/98 0.102ppm 0.088 0.014 9/11/98 0.098ppm 0.080 0.018 9/12/98 0.100ppm 0.084 0.016 9/13/98 0.099ppm 0.084 0.015 10/23/98 0.101 ppm 0.081 0.020 Average Difference: 0:013 * days in which an a ceedance of the state ozone standard also occurred at Atascadero 1. Numbers in bold indicate days in which the federal ozone standard was also exceeded. 2. During the 25 days that Paso Robles exceeded the state ozone standard Black Mountain exceeded the standard 7 days. 000034 o 75 c, Q 0 0 El co Oz J � s ri�rf'.'tv1 rr:X11 f f r'ftf r/tr lif 1 N r•!fS! r J (r! r f/f r r f\(({�r) ``��., `('•},;}.`!:}r:ill}T,.�,};.11\�:}\'`•; 1 ,.` ,.'}1})i\�j �� �� 7 T �.}�'j1'••"•.`'`1`:')`::1`:}(i}`.\',4'\(•11::..,F;ti{ r1,] (`l}a.�J.. '�.......... L s. �fi�� tif�Cri,;,,•r�`l.J:'r'r)}rs{,)>.:'fl��;•'r1,tiF(%}}`��Z,���� I j ��s+w C )t{',•yeti,`;j i j��;'�)'��t''1`:}L?�};:j''} � ', r� n 4 .4'k y+`�y � ^,PW*a `? ^.irW y.T •'Rem #x`S�,$ 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O 000 o opt- CO N 0 0 0 0 uoill!q aad sued 000035 RECENT PM10 DATA SUMMARY 1991 through 1997 Total State Standard Violations Max Value Paso Atas Moro SLO Nipo Rale UCD1 Co. Total (diff.-days) 1998 1 0 0 0 12 4 15 73 1997 1 1 1 2 - 16 5 17 99 1996 0 0 0 .0 0 12 6 12 98 1995 3 3 0 1 1 14 4 17 99 1994 0 1 0 1 1 12 6 13 107 1993 2 5 2 1 1 19 10 21 141 1992 2 0 0 0 0 8 8 10 135 1991 (4)* 3 .0 1 0 10 10** 21 119 * PM 10 monitoring b rgan at the Sherwood Fire Station in Paso Robles in September, 1991, so data for this year are incomplete. ** PM 10 monitoring at UCD1 began in June, 1991, after the sampler was moved from UCD2 (nearby) in May. For a 1991 UCD 1 total, UCD2 exceedances are added to those from UCD 1. H:\TECH\AQSTATS\RECPMI .PHA April 1, 1999 000036 Green party of Calif- ornia , P.O. BOX 13244, San Luis Obispo, Ca 93406 SL 0 GREEN PARTY Attachment:B Atascadero City Council Meetirig Date:4/13/99 Public Comment SLO GREEN PARTY 4/13/99 At Atascadero City Council meeting: Increasing Ozone levels in SLO Norths be-CuOt on We refer to our letter from 319/99 and ask again that our 4 specific req P the agenda. ' round level, it is a man-made Ozone is an indicator for smog in general. g P ollutant known to cause impaired breathing and diminishednwine. Other components of especially smog children. It also stunts the growth of crops, inclu ing wrisks of are known carcinogens. A recent Congressional studs has abl un established a the 1990 federal cancer.in L.A. are up to 426 times higher thah health standards epeat he mistakes made in the L.A.area, Clean Air Act. Obviously, we do not wantRobltoand thetSLO County Board of Supervisors all yet the cities of Atascadero and P asoare presently pursuing growth policies which will substantially increase traffic and smog in the North County. of Paso Robles In the 1990 Citizen Iain quality one prioritynnaire, the , that was ahead of declared the preservation of air quality jobs, ahead of better streets and bridges, ahead development ogonlytIF and WHEN adequate er specific criteria. 80% of the residents wanted re resources, in air quality, are availableuaWr of theio not b believe alle whatecan be more about.the Atascadero feel less strongly quality . important than the air we breathe. In 1998, there were 23 days of unh oX. 120 days on which air in Paso. stmeasurements the air may become for ozone trends indicate an additional app Y unhealthy in the future. That's bad on more evidence that aeout of every large portion t on ofrthe dozone is The APCD data show compelling transported into our area from the obuilt-tip Inner Valley. That, however, leaves us in a Valley he position for avoiding a further smog P here. a lot expected to double by the year 2040 the smogandrBak esrt s bound to eld? Moreo Bert, Paso worse. How do you want to mitigate that? Suing Fresno another 1600 homes approved. We can only hope that you will not follow that exam problem What we can do is adjusting our the short olice our request willtdo hat,to tincl.smogour call for that w with our-own urban sprawl". In a moratorium on all development which theld increase combustionraffic eng nenand'to our,oreliance on �* run, our society must find alternatives tod be well fossil fuels. But until then we here in the Nor se stationth s forr f not for thedpurposeoofeed the warnings from the APCD data. What are the alerting us into action? We trust that you will take that action. • 000037 Attachment: C Atascadero City Council Meeting Date: 4/13/99 John W. McNeil 8765 Sierra Vista Rd. Atascadero , CA 93422 April 13, 1.999 City Council Atascadero, CA Honorable Mayor and Council Members All of us take pride in our democratic government . That govern- ment to be truly democratic Aust offer the opportunity to vote , but also must inform the electorate so that they can vote intelligently. . Did I hear Amen! Amen! What is the most critical issue facing us in Atascadero today? Redevelopment . Who will determine how redevelopment will be used in Atascadero? The City Council. rho is the controlling agency? The Community Redevelopment Agency (CRr.; . And who is that? The City Council . Who has the power .to condemn nrivete property not for pu1lic - benefit but fo private profit for a fe..r favored developers? Who . can incur- a 1 r e bond indebtedness i-,i thout voter approval?-The City Council . Has the City Council wearing its CRA hat set un meetings to educate the public about redevelopment? Yes it has--meetings fol- lowing the City Council meetings, that is late at night ! How will tha City Council acting as the CRA pay ' for redevelopment? Right out of y ur pocketbook as you could have guessed. How? By arbitrarily syphoning of the annual real property tax increments on your-propertyand my property--money now flowing to schools, fire and police , libraries , etc . But have no fear. Your City Council will use these funds Judi- ciously--that is for dearly loved friends and developers. Now all of this need not be a horror story of political conniving;. redevelopment can be good for Atascadero But , knowing the present City Council , What do you think? Sincerely and unapologetically, 0038 Attachment:D April 13, 1999 Atascadero City Council Meeting Date: 4/13/99 ; Mr. Mayor and Councilmembers : Wade McKinney was quoted in the Atascadero News . "We encourage, the .public to come to the Redevelopment .Ag.e lcy' mee-ting and help the Agency clarify the community' s direction on this ,issue,,, What a farce ! Any councilperson or staff member who was serious- about hearing from the public would schedule Agency meetings at an hour convenient to that public .- It was no accident that all these meetings come late at night It is no accident that the promised pro and con educational meetings which staff- claimed would be in a timely manner.; have not been held. We oppose- the taking of private property through condemnation for private gain of a few.. We oppose discussing such topics when the councilchambers are -almost empty.. I. request , no, I' demand that all Redevelopment Agency meetings be held at a time when the public can attend. I request that notice be given in more than one newspaper. DorotY McNeil 8755ferL Vista Rd. Atascadero, CA 93422 r t 000039 — Attachment: E Atascadero City Council = ct Meetuig Date:4/13/99 0-4 OL fie.-�t,g , icl � GA, 0(3 Jzz, 000040 ITEM NUMBER: A - 3 DATE: 04/27/99 n 1979 C&I 99 C&I City Mani ger's Agenda Report Wade G. McK'nney Weed Abatement Program RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council adopt Resolution No. 1999-017, declaring vegetative growth and/or refuse a public nuisance, commencing proceedings for the abatement of said nuisances, and placing all abatemen fees on the San Luis Obispo County special tax assessment for the fiscal year 1999-2000 tax r 11. A DISCUSSION: City Ordinance No. 337, Section 6-13.03,addresses the abatement of vegetative growth and/or refuse, which constit to a hazard. Adoption of Resolution No. 1999-017 is the first step in this annual program, which requires council action. Exhibit"A" lists 4,748 parcels that have been identified to have ve etative growth that may become a public nuisance. Exhibit"B"lists 19 parcels that have been identified to contain refuse that are a public nuisance. Both exhibits are on file in the office of the city clerk. The initial inspection of parcels was completed during the first week of April. FISCAL IMPACT: Costs involved in administering this program are recovered through the 100%administrative fee charged to parcels abated of the city contractor. ALTERNATIVES: No alternative is recommended. RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: Fire Department ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Resolution No. 1999-017 Weed Abatement Notice ice Refuse Notice Vegetative Growth/Refuse(Year Round)Notice 000041 RESOLUTION NO. 1999-017 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DECLARING VEGETATIVE GROWTH AND/OR REFUSE A PUBLIC NUISANCE, COMMENCING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ABATEMENT OF SAID NUISANCES, AND PLACING ALL ABATEMENT FEES ON THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SPECIAL TAX ASSESSMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 TAX ROLL The City Council of the .City of Atascadero, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: SECTION 1. That vegetative growth and/or refuse are a public nuisance and hereby declare to be such for the reasons that vegetative growth may attain such a large growth as to become a fire menace and/or drainage restriction, when mature, and said refuse may become a public nuisance, thereby creating a hazard to public health. The City Council of the City of Atascadero finds and declares that vegetative growth and/or refuse on specified parcels of property are seasonal and recurrent nuisances. Such seasonal and recurrent nuisances shall be abated in accordance with the provisions of City and State laws. No further hearings need to be held, and it shall be sufficient to mail a post card notice to the owner of the property as their address appears upon the current assessment roll. SECTION 2. A description of the parcels of lots of private property upon which, or in front of which, said nuisances exist, according to the official Assessment Map of said City of Atascadero, shall be posted annually in the office of the City Clerk and referred to as Exhibit A (weeds) and/or Exhibit B (refuse). _ SECTION 3. The City Clerk or designee is hereby ordered and directed to mail written notices of the proposed abatement to all persons owning property described in accordance with Section 6-13.08 of the Atascadero Municipal Code, Ordinance No. 337. SECTION 4. Pursuant to Section 6-13.10 of the Atascadero Municipal Code, the City Council shall hear and consider all objections or protests to the required removal of said vegetative growth and/or refuse. The City Clerk shall post a copy of the public hearing notice in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act. SECTION 5. Pursuant to Section 6-13.17 of the Atascadero Municipal Code, if the owner does not abate the hazard, it will be abated by the city contractor. The cost of abatement, 100% administrative fee, and county fee will be assessed upon the county property tax bill, and constitute a lien upon such land until paid. On motion by Councilperson and seconded by Councilperson , the foregoing Resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES:. J ABSENT: ADOPTED: 000042 Resolution No. 1999-017 Page Two , ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: MARCIA M. TORGE RSON, City Clerk RAY JOHNSON, Mayor APPROVED AS TO ORM: ROY A. HANLEY, City Attorney 000043 Resolution No. 1999-017 Page Three EXHIBIT"A" ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 000044 Resolution No. .1999-017 Page Four EXHI IT"B" ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 000045 ITY OF ATASCADERO 1918 ® 1 79 - FIRE DEPARTMENT MAILING-LABEL'- E— ASSESSOR'S_PARCEL-NUMBER Dear Atascadero PropertyOwnet• You areiemnded that -weed abatement season has arrived. An extra effort has been'made to send this notice only to property owners that may continue to have-weed ordinance violations; which were visually inspected during,the first two weeks of April. DISREGARD,THIS NOTICE IF YOU HAVE CUT YOUR WEEDS AND YOUR PROPERTY.REMAINS.N, 'COMPLIANCE THROUGHOUT THE SUMMER SEASON PLEASE SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION : ON , REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE The following notice is require&by 1aw to be submitted to you. It enables the fire department to abate dangerous weeds in an effort to make your neighborhood safer in the event of afire. Thank you for your continuing assistance in making this a safe city and fire season: , NOTICE TO DESTROY VEGETATIVE'GROWTH Notice is.hereby given that on the 27th'day of April, 1999, the City Council"passed'a resolution declaring that noxious weeds constitute a fire hazard which must be abated by the'cutting of said 'noxious weeds. If the owner does not abate the hazard,'it will be.abated by the city and the cost of the removal will be assessed,upon,the county, property tax bill and will constitute a lien upon such land until paid. Reference is;hereby made to the resolution for further:p"articulars and Ordinance : No. 337.A copy of said resolution is'on file in the office of the city clerk. All property owners having any objections to the proposed removal of the 'hazard;are hereby notified to_attend a;meeting of the City Council of the City of Atascadero to be held,May 25, 1999,when their objections will be heard and given due consideration.: Dated:.This 28th day of April 1999 /s/Michael P, McCain Fire Chief _ :City of Atascadero,California ; 6005 LEWIS AVENUE •. ATASCADERO,CA 93422 • (805)461-5070 FAX(805),466-2907 000046 �Thedeadline`for weed abatement is June 4 '1999 Inspections were mad in,the first two weeks of April and at that time your par-cel was identified as requiring weeds to,be cut. ,If your property has-been abated since our inspection and meets our requirem nts, disregard this'notice. The city.contractor Will,abate;parcels that are not in compliance,by'June 4, 1999. Contractor's fees, as well as 'applicable city and county fees/fines will be adde to your tax bill. If you have weeds past this date, they:will be cut by the city,unless you have t em cut prior to our contractor's unscheduled arrival. REQUIREMENTS FOR MOWING VEGETATIVE GROWTH :a)_ Maximum height of 4 inches; b) Located within 100,feet of any building nor structure, or to the property line,whichever is nearer; c) Locatedc within 50 feet from the edge of any,improved roadway; d) .Located within 50 feet from each property line; e) Lo ated within.10 feet,on each side of driveways. Exemption: The interior portion o fenced animal pastures with livestock and agricultural fields growing hay or grains. However, a 'culturaf fields must be cut at harvest time..Uncut hay and grain will be - subject to abatement. Drainage.-Ditches And Culverts ` Any ditch, culvert, an or pipe used as means of public drainage or°drainage control shall be cleaned and'inaintained in a.manner that does not restrict the natural or engineered flow of water. Questions. regarding Weed abatement may be directed to the City. Weed Abatement,Officer by' leaving a recorded message :at- (805) 466-0770, ,or; by writing to: City _of Atascadero, Fire Department, 'Abatement Officer,6005 Lewis Ave.,,Atascadero, CA_9.3422 PLEASE RETAIN THIS NOTICE FOR ANY RELATED CONMIMCATIONS CITy OF ATASCADERO-FIRE DEPARTMENT 805461.5070' - OU004'7 J i .. . . OF ATY'k CLTY ' ADERN SC O 1918 \ / FIRE DEPARTMENT CAD MAILING LABEL E= ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUNMER Dear Atascadero Property Owner: An"inspection was made on the above stated parcel during the firsttwo weeks _f April."Your property was found,to be,in violation of Ordinance No.. 337,_ NOTICE TO REMOVE REFUSE Notice is hereby given that on the 27th day of April,1999, the City Council passed.a resolution declaring that refuse constitutes a health hazard,"which must be,abated by,the removal of said refuse. If the owner does not comply, it_will be removed by,the,city, and the cost ofthe removal assessed upon the county property tax bill, and will constitute a lien upon such land until paid. Reference is hereby made to the resolution for further particulars and Ordinance No. 3 3 T A`copy of said resolution is on file in the office of the city clerk., All property owners having any objections to the proposed removal of the health;hazard are hereby notified to attend a meeting of the City Council of the City of Atascadero to be held May 25, 1,999,when their objections will be heard,and given due consideration: Dated: This 28th day of April 1999. /sl Michael P.McCain Fire:.Ch'tef City of-Atascadero,,Cahfoiiva Y The deadline for refuse,removal is June 4 1999" Please retain this notice for any related communications , City of Atascadero Fire Department 805 461.5070' - 6005 LEWIS AVENUE • ATASCADERO,CA 93422 • (805)461-5070 -.:FAX(805)466-2 ITY OF A` ASCADERO 191$ a FIRE DEPARTMENT E. \ CAD MA�JN LABEL F—ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER , Dear Atascadero Property Owner: An inspection was made.on the above stated parcel.Your property was found to`'be in violation of Ordinance No. 337 arid Uniform Fire Code(UFC) Section 1103.2.4. We have identified NOTICE TO REMOVE REFUSE%DEAD VEGETATION '_.: Notice is hereby given that ori the 27th day,of April; 1999 the City Council passed a resolution declaring that refuse/lead vegetation'constitutes':'a health hazard, which must be abated by the removal of said refuse/dead vegetation. If the owner does notcomply, it will be removed by the city, and the cost of i he removal,will be billed to the property owner directly, or assessed upon the county property ax bill, and, will constitute a lien,upon such land until paid. For, further particulars, reference is hereby made to the Resolution, .Ordinance No. 337, and UFC Section ' 1103.2.4. A copy of s aid resolution is on file in the office of the city clerk. Dated: This day of '1999., r - /s/Michael P.McCak Fiure Chief City of Atascadero, California The dc adline'for refuse/dead ve etation removal is June 4, 1999 : Any questions;please'contact the City 9f tascadero Fire Department 805.461.5070 6005 LEWIS AVE i.TE ATASCADERO,CA 93422 (805)461-5070'- 'PAX(805)466-2900 ITEM NUMBER: A - 4 DATE: 04/27/99 n 1918 W 19 8 CADS GtyManager's Agenda Report Wade G. McKinney Es ablishment of No Parking Zone—Palma Avenue RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council adopt attached Resolution No. 1999-021 establishing a No Parking Zone on Palma Ave ue, from the intersection with Rosario, 280 feet to the north. DISCUSSION: The roadway width n this location is insufficient to provide on-street parking and still allow for the safe flow of two-way traffic. Travel lanes require a minimum of 10 feet in each direction, parking lanes requir 8 feet, the existing roadway width is 25'. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of posting 80' on both sides of Palma Avenue is approximately $400.00 to be paid out of currently budgeted street division funds. RESPONSIBLY, DEPARTMENT: Community Services ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 1999.021 0000;0 RESOLUTION NO. 1999-021 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DESIGNATING A NO PARKING ZONE ON PALMA AVENUE WHEREAS, Section 4-2.1101,et. seq.,of the Atascadero Municipal Code allows the City Traffic.Engineer to-designate 'Wo Parking" areas, and to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating the same; and WHEREAS, staff has studied the traffic problems at this location and has determined that establishing a "No Parking" zone as shown on the attached Exhibit A will improve the situation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Atascadero directs the City Traffic Engineer to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings as indicated on attached"Exhibit A". On motion by Councilman , and seconded by Councilman the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO MARCIA M. TORGERSON RAY JOHNSON City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROY A. HANLEY City Attorney • 0000.51 Z90000 g ;o Z abed 66/EZ/EO 30 [wvgvdD pg,tvQJ (Naim puv malaad uoljvpuaauuroaad s,�arnsna j dj!D) ouoAT :;abdzuj Imsrd - 8.661 ?aquiOAOM - jzo aZI s,j3jnsp3il I mom :sluoda2I Gmv SlNjawaaNulommv rilaNifloa poziad uimoj cjuntuwoj ay pasoIo uosuyof.iodfvy4T •spun3 juviq jallogS X uD�jauig zoj p3ilddu osla svq ag jugl powis uluw 'JW 'osln �3uipun3 ggCID joj SuiXIddt,pals 22ns ITounoD agZ •soK `papuodsaj uiuW •jW •2uppjm ui isanbaj sigl optnu ON au jT pD)lsu uosug f joXtW -000`V$3o junoum agl ui aouulsissu IL'ivauzalddns joj pounoD agj p3Nsu `salgoW osUd'°Dnij(l jagwV 8ZZ£ `loofoid 2uisnoH ssalau OH 3TJO luapTsajd `u'BW •(I•f suoil�ztun�jo gioq ui XauoTu DABS of ujajsXs iisubj IuTof n japTsuoa IoijisTQ IoogoS pui? XIiZ) agj pais322ns aH •2uT133ui SIT W sanilnivasajdoj joiij,iQ IoogoS DLII Das of pulO sT ag wql paltJS `•anV sTma-I 0099 `suIUcroJ J oTjg • 'saouajaJJTp jTagl anlosaj of 2uT31j0m 31C XITO puR jotjjsTQ loogoS aql juga ajnst,ald sTg possajdxD ag `uazTlTo ajvnTjd U sv`'oxapUosnjv o sassouisnq Mau BuiIOi=illi,pub BuTBuinooua uo posn3o3 sT joqumgD agj jugj pounoD Dili pagilou `Dojauiui D jo zaquiregD jo anTiuluomidaj "3AV ojuToL'f UBS SS£S `uapJUD PH 'uzagl JOJ palon I-eqj Dldood agj glim gonol jo ino ajn Xogl moth puL sunToT '•Iod uo slgEnogl sig possoidxa `anijQ gnlD AilunoD SS99 `uasuu f puouiXL,g •onssi jamas luanbuilap sTgj 2UTA10S spjumol Niom of ITounoD agi poOin OH •p nlosaj aq uuo anssi jamas aqj jugl os Builoom sighju juasajd sanijUjuosojdaj loT4sTQ looqoS agl Das of Inpuuqi sT ag Iraqi polvis `066I xog •O•d `Dureuialo-X gsnZj mojjouzoj of popuodsw pue, pDmainaa aq Illm ii puu Xtpol Xlio aql of jaiial u was pug sppoQ '.'Cl lugl paluls uosugo f TOXLW •panlosaj aq uno still jvgj sadog aH •anssi sigl ssajppu llim Magi IL rano' of IiounoD agl sjuum piuog IoogoS oql •anssi sigj uo uOTl�oiunuiLLToo jo �Iouj u uaaq sng onip slooj ag iugj poluls OH 'saaJ jamas luonbutlap o saoilou pajouBT KIpa>?adaz si;TI jotjjsi(I Tooga aqj ILgl powft SOXuH UW -uoTuido IugI gjIm aaii?u jou scop pjuog IoogoS ogj jugj mou)l ljoun oD agj jol of igOTuoj ajag sT ag lugl pauTuldxa OH •XuiapBOV SIN Ould OT JO ssaj2ojd agj papadvm st?g XI!, agj Iaaj ogm oilgnd agj jo sngwaui autos oju ajagl ILul ojumu si ag lUgl palms `pjuog i TjlsTQ IoogoS agl jo anTWjuosojdaa `puo21 sooiPW uuS 9L6L `sDXUH majpuV :wflHoj A,LWWWOD RESOLUTION 1999-021 EXHIBIT'A FCHUURCH EREIDENTIAL 280 FT.RED ClEACH SIDE PALMA AVE E 77 l 3 ESCUELA W POLICE DEL RIO STATION O O EL CAMINO REAL ok 000052 ITEM NUMBER: A - 5 DATE: 04/27/99 • i 0'i i ® i x 1918 w 1a CADF,�� City Man ger's Agenda Report Wade G. McK'nney Installation of Stop Sign —Los Gatos Avenue RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council adopt Resolution No. 1999-020 authorizing the installation of a stop sign on Los Gatos Avenue at the intersection with Flores Avenue. DISCUSSION: • This is a three-way intersection with Los Gatos Avenue being the through street. The initial citizen request for this modification stated that the stop sign on Flores was not needed and the request was to move that stop sign to Los Gatos. Staff feels that an additional stop sign on Los Gatos would improve safety at this intersection. Removing the stop sign on Flores is not recommended. Although the stop sign on Flores may not be crucial, removing an established stop sign can cause confusion and accidents and is not recommended. FISCAL IMPACT: Cost of the installation is approximately $200.00 to be paid out of currently budgeted funds. RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: Community Services ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 1999-020 +000053 RESOLUTION NO. 1999-020 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DESIGNATING STOP INTERSECTION ON LOS GATOS AT FLORES AVENUE WHEREAS, Section 4-2.801, et. seq., of the Atascadero Municipal Code allows the City Traffic Engineer to determine the location of STOP intersections, and to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating the same;and WHEREAS, staff has studied the traffic problems at this location and has determined that installation, of a stop sign as shown on the attached Exhibit A will improve the situation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Atascadero directs,the City Traffic Engineer to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings as indicated on attached"Exhibit A". On motion by Councilman and seconded by.Councilman , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: • ADOPTED: ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO MARCIA M. TORGERSON RAY JOHNSON - City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROY A. HANLEY City Attorney 000054 • RESOLUTION NO 1999-020 EXEIIBTT A SAN MARCOS AVENUE 9� O EXISTING PROPOSED � STOP.SIGN EXISTING Q` SANTA LUCIA AVENUE 000055 ITEM NUMBER: A - 6 DATE: 04/27/99 1918 � 1 9 City y Man ger's Agenda Report Wade G. McKinney 2 Hour Parking Zone— El Camino Real RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council adopt Resolution No. 1999-019 designatinga portion of El Camino Real as a 2-Hour Parking Zone. DISCUSSION: Long term parking in this area creates a hardship for the businesses in this area that rely on the on-street parking for their customers. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of posting vU be approximately $200.00 to be paid out of currently budgeted street division funds. RESPONSIBLE'DEPARTMENT: Community Services ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 1999-019 000056 RESOLUTION NO. 1999-019 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO DESIGNATING 2 HOUR PARKING ON A PORTION OF EL CAMINO REAL WHEREAS, Section 4-2.1101, et. seq., of the Atascadero Municipal Code allows the City Traffic Engineer to designate limited time parking areas, and to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings indicating the same;and WHEREAS, long term parking in this area creates a hardship for local businesses. WHEREAS, staff has studied the traffic problems at this location and has determined that establishing a"2 Hour Parking"zone as shown on the attached Exhibit A will improve the situation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Atascadero directs the City Traffic Engineer to place and maintain appropriate signs or markings as indicated on attached"Exhibit A". On motion by Councilman , and seconded by Councilman the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety on the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: ATTEST: CITY OF ATASCADERO MARCIA M. TORGERSON RAY JOHNSON City Clerk Mayor. APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROY A. HANLEY City Attorney 00005'7 RESOLUTION NO. 1999-019 EXHIBIT A EAST MALL BP S :PEA:BODY STAT ON M z a BONN MA x STRICTLY BREW NG GOURMET CO & RANCHO �41 DEN 'S Q Q CENTURY PLAZA MI STATE U BANK W 000058 ITEM NUMBER: A - 7 DATE: 04/27/99 �■ ®6' r,® 1918 1979 City Manager s Agenda Report Wade G. McK nney TRAFFIC WAY/ROUTE 101 INTERCHANGE PROJECT STUDY REPORT RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council authorize the Mayor to enter into a Consultant Services Agreement with OMNI-MEANS' LTD. for preparation of a Project Study Report for the Traffic Way/Route 101 Interchange. DISCUSSION: At their February 23, 1999 meeting Council authorized staff to solicit proposals from consultants for the preparation of a Project Study Report(PSR) for the Traffic Way/Route 101 interchange. The PSR will evaluate various alternatives for improving the operation and safety of the Traffic Way/Route 101 interchange. The PSR will evaluate the effects the Route 41/101 interchange has on the Traffic Way interchange. A PSR is required by CalTrans and SLOCOG for any major project which is to be funded through the State or Regional Transportation Improvement Program(STIP or R 'IP). Requests for proposals(RFP)were sent to seven consultants. OMNI-MEANS, LTD. was the only consultant that responded to the request. A copy of the RFP and OMNI-MEANS proposal is attached to this sta f report for reference. OMNI-MEANS base fee for preparing the PSR is $75,000. Optional services we e offered by the consultant. These services include community awareness activities (i.e. community workshops,project newsletters, etc.) and an evaluation of a new under- crossing at Atascadeto Mall as requested by Council. The cost of the community awareness activities is estimate to be$4,125.00. The cost of evaluating the new under-crossing is estimated to be $2,885.00 for a conceptual/qualitative evaluation and $15,135.00 for a detailed evaluation which could ultimately be included in the PSR. 000059 ITEM NUMBER: A - 4 DATE: 02/23/99 Staff is recommending that the Council not approve the optional services identified above. Project newsletters can be distributed by staff if required. Community workshops can be held by staff. In addition, the Project Development Team meetings will be open to the public. Preliminary discussions with the consultant indicate that it would be cost-prohibitive to construct a new under-crossing at Atascadero Mall. Funding from sources outside the City would likely not be availablefor a new under-crossing. Furthermore, a new under-crossing may have the undesirable effect of directing larger volumes of traffic through the residential areas along Atascadero Avenue. An accelerated schedule is required for the preparation of the PSR in order to take advantage of construction funds which may become available from the currently programmed Route 41/101 interchange project. Funds from the Route 41/101 interchange project may be available to fund improvements at Traffic Way if it can demonstrated that improvements at Traffic Way could improve the safety and operation of the Route 41 interchange. A evaluation committee was established to review and evaluate the proposal. Copies of the Committee's evaluation sheets are attached to this staff report. The Committee consisted of the following individuals: Jerry Gibbs, CalTrans Local Projects Engineer Scott Eades, San Luis Obispo Council of Governments Planner Paul Saldana, Community Development Director Brady Cherry, Community Services Director John Neil, Assistant City Engineer. Due to the accelerated schedule required for the preparation of the PSR and considering that the evaluation committee members generally gave the consultant's proposal a high rating, staff is recommending that the Council authorize the Mayor to enter into a consultant services agreement with OMNI-MEANS, LTD.to prepare the Traffic Way/Route 101 interchange PSR with a total fee not to exceed $75,000. FISCAL IMPACT: SLOCOG has programmed a total of$61,000 of Urban and Regional Surface Transportation Funds for the preparation of the Traffic Way/Route 101 Interchange PSR. The remaining $14,000 will be obligated in the Fiscal Year 99/00 City Budget from Local Transportation Funds (i.e. TDA non-transit funds and/or Streets & Bridges Impact Funds). 000060 ITEM NUMBER: A - 4 DATE: 02/23/99 M ALTERNATIVE 1. Do not prepare a Project Study Report-Regional SHA funds could be lost as well as the opportunity,to improve the Traffic Way interchange with funds other than local transportation funds. Not combining the interchange improvements could limit the type of improvements which could be constructed at Traffic Way. The type, level and cost of operational and safety improvements at the interchange would remain unknown. 2. Request additional proposals - Direct staff to request proposals from other consultants. The additional time required to obtain and evaluate additional proposals would compromise the project schedule. 'CalTrans has already begun their environmental determination for the Route 41 interchange. Delaying the preparation of the Traffic Way PSR could limit the ability of the City to modify the scope of the Route 41 interchange improvements and subsequent limit the type of improvement the City could construct at the Traffic Way interchange. Ideally,modifications to the scope of the Route 41 interchange project should occur before or during the environmental determination stage of the project. RESPONSIBLEDEPARTMENT: Community Services ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A- Cons altant Services Agreement Attachment B - Request for Proposal Attachment C - OW I-MEANS, LTD. proposal Attachment D - Evaluation Committee Comments 000061 ATTACHMENT A Consultant Services Agreement 000062 CITY OF ATASCADERO CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT for the THIS AGREEMENT is rr ade and entered into by and between the CITY OF ATASCADERO, hereinafter referred to as "City", an J OMNI-MEANS, Ltd., hereinafter referred to as "Consultant". Witnesseth that for and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: Article 1 -Authorizatio A. Consultant will periorm the services as contracted under this Agreement upon receipt of the Notice to Proceed issued by tie City Engineer. B. The following exhibits are attached hereto, and incorporated herein, by reference as though here fully set forth: 1. Exhibit A-Proposal and Fee Schedule 2. Exhibit BRequest for Proposal Article 2-Responsibili 'ies of Consultant A. Consultant will provide a professional engineering services as necessary to perform the warrant analyses and will provide a bound report of the studies to the City, all as itemized in Exhibit A and Exhibit B. B. In the performance of Consultant's service under this Agreement, Consultant agrees that he will maintain such coordination with City officials as may be requested and desirable, including primary coordination with the City Engineer. C. Insofar as they maybe applicable to the project contemplated by this Agreement, Consultant shall render the services per Exhibit A and Exhibit B,commencing with receipt of a written Notice to Proceed signed by the City Engineer. Article 3-Responsibilities of Ci The City will cooperate with the Consultant on all phases of the services covered by this Agreement and will make available to him, as his needs indicate,all existing maps,topographic maps, aerial photographs, soils reports, and other similar data in possession of City covering the sites selected. Article 4-Fee and Provision for Payment A. City will pay Consultant a fee of not to exceed Seventy Five Thousand dollars and no cents ($75,000.00) for services contracted under this Agreement. B. Consultant shall submit monthly progress reports to City indicating the state-of-completion of each task specified in Exhibit A. C. Consultant will be paid no later than thirty(30) days following approval of the Consultant's progress City of Atascadero Consulting Services Agreement Page 1 of 5 Pages 000063 report and invoice by the Community Services Director. Any additional applicable hourly g rate billings as authorized in Article 5 shall be based on the Fee Schedules incorporated into this Agreement.as Exhibit A. Article 5-Payment for Extra Services or Changes Any claim for payment for extra services or changes in the services will be paid by City only upon certification by the City Engineer that the claimed extra service or change was authorized in advance by the City Engineer and the Community Services Director, and that the service has been satisfactorily completed. Invoices for extra services which are approved by the City Engineer and Community Services Director must be submitted by Consultant within thirty(30) days of completion of such services and must be accompanied by a statement of itemized costs covering said.services. Article 6-Suspension or Termination of Agreement A. If Consultant fails to comply with the conditions of the Agreement, City may, by written notice of the City Engineer and the Community Services Director, suspend the Agreement and withhold further,payments pending corrective action by Consultant or a decision to terminate the Agreement. After receipt of notice of suspension, Consultant may not incur additional obligations of Agreement funds during the suspension unless specifically authorized by the'City Engineer and the Community Services Director. B. Either party hereto shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon giving ten (10) days written notice of such termination of this project in its entirety, notwithstanding any other fee provisions of this Agreement, based upon services accomplished by Consultant prior to notice of such termination. Consultant shall be entitled to the reasonable value of his services involved in the termination, as determined by City, upon a finding which shall be final and conclusive as to the amount of fee due and owing. Article 7-Time of Completion Consultant agrees to diligently pursue the services under this Agreement and to complete the services as described in Exhibit A to the point of providing the bound report within 30 days from receipt of the written Notice to Proceed signed by the City Engineer. Consultant shall not be responsible for any delay which is caused by City review, action or inaction of City and/or any state or federal agency, or acts of God, but shall be responsible for his own fault or negligence or that of any of his subcontractors. Article 8-Conflicts of Interest No member, officer, or employee of City, during his or her tenure, or for one(1)year thereafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement or the proceeds thereof. Article 9-Ownership of Data The ownership of all data collected for use by Consultant under this Agreement,together with working papers, drawings, and other materials necessary for a complete understanding of the plans and necessary for the practical use of the plans shall be vested in City. Ownership.of original drawings and documents shall be vested in City. Consultant may retain a copy of all work for his own use. Article 10-Covenant Against Continent Fees Consultant warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for him,to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than bona fide employee working solely for him, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration contingent on or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to annul this City of Atascadero Consulting Services Agreement Page 2 of 5 Pages 000064 Agreement without liab lity or, in its discretion,to deduct from the contract price or consideration or otherwise recover,the f' II amount of such fee,commission, percentage fee, gift, or contingency. Article 11 -Contract P 'rsonnel The services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed by Martin R. Inouye and such other personnel in the employ or under the supervision of Consultant who shall be approved by City. The City official who shall b vested with the right of approval of such additional personnel or outside contracting parties shall be the City Manager. City reserves the right to reject any of Consultant's personnel or proposed outside consultants, and City reserves the right to request that acceptable replacement personnel be assigned to the project. Article 12-Indemnitv QaoLe Consultant shall defend indemnify, and save harmless the City of Atascadero, its officers, agents, and d employees, from any and all claims,demands,damages,costs,expenses, and liabilities arising out of this Agreement or occasioned by the negligent performance of the provisions hereof including, but not limited to, any negligent act or omission to act on the part of Consultant or his agents or employees or independent contractors directly responsible to him,except that the above shall not apply to the negligence or willful misconduct of City orCity's agents, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to City. This indemnification provision shall apply even if there is concurrent or joint negligence of indemnitor and indemnitee, and even if there is active or passive negligence by either or both parties. Article 13-Insurance A. Errors and Omissions Insurance. Consultant shall obtain and maintain, at his own expense, prior to commencement of 'he work of this Agreement, professional liability(errors and omissions) insurance, in a company authorized to issue such insurance in the State of California,with limits of liability of not less than one million dc Ilars($1,000,000)to cover all professional services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Such insurance shall be kept in force for one(1)year beyond the date of Notice of Completion of the project as accepted by the City Council. B. Automobile and Pu:)Iic Liabili1y Insurance. Consultant shall also maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agr' ement, automobile insurance and public liability insurance with an insurance carrier satisfactory to City, hich insurance shall include protection against claims arising from personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and damage to property resulting from any actual occurrence arising out of the performa' ce of this Agreement. The amounts of insurance shall be not less than the following: 1. Single limit coverage applying to bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and property damage or a combination thereof in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000). The following endorsements must be attached to the policy or policies: 1. If the insurance policy covers on an "accident" basis, it must be changed to "occurrence". 2. The policy mut cover personal injury as well as bodily injury. 3. Broad form property damage liability must be afforded. 4. The City of Atascadero, its officers, employees, and agents,shall be named as insured under the policy, and the policy shall stipulate that the insurance will operate as primary insurance and that no other insurance effected by City will be called upon to contribute to a loss hereunder. 5. The policy shall contain contractual liability, either on a blanket basis or by identifying this Agreement within a contractual liability endorsement. City of Atascadero Consulting Services Agreement Page 3 of 5 Pages 000065 6. The policy shall contain "cross-liability"such that each insured is covered as if separate policies had been issued to each insured. 7. City shall be given thirty(30)days notice prior to cancellation or reduction in coverage of the insurance. C. Workers Compensation Insurance. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code,Consultant shall be insured against liability for workers compensation or undertake self-insurance. Consultant agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing performance of any services under this Agreement. D. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall submit to the City Engineer all certificates of insurance evidencing that Consultant has the insurance required by this Agreement within ten (10)days after receipt of Notice of Award. Said certificates shall state the project number and that the policy shall not be assigned,canceled, or reduced in coverage without thirty(30)days written notice to City, and that such insurance not relieve or decrease the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for payment of damages resulting from any service or operation performed pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform any services under this Agreement until the required insurance certificates have been submitted to City and approved by these provisions, or fails or refuses to furnish City required proof that insurance has been procured and is in force and paid for, City shall have the right,at its discretion,to forthwith terminate this Agreement. Article 14-Status Consultant shall,during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor, and in no event shall any of his personnel or subcontractors be construed to be employees of City. Article 15-Non-Discrimination Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Presidential Executive Order No. 11246 of September 24, 1965, and all other orders, regulations, and laws governing non-discrimination in employment, including in particular, Section 122(a) of the State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972. Article 16-Modification of Agreement This Agreement may be further modified only by a written amendment signed by both parties hereto. Article 17- Law Governing This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Article 18-Communications Communications between the parties to this Agreement may be sent to the following address: City: CITY OF ATASCADERO 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 Attn: Steven J. Sylvester, City Engineer City mof Atascadero Consulting Services Ag Page 4 of 5 Pages 000066 Consultant: ACCEPTED AND AGREED this the day of 1999. CITY OF ATASCADER , CONSULTANT, a municipal corporation By By Ray Johnson, Mayor', Printed Name and Title ATTEST: Marcia M.Torgerson, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Steven J. Sylvester, City Engineer X:\9 9115\CNS LTA G R.W P D City of Atascadero Consulting Services Agreement Page 5 of 5 Pages 00006'7 ATTACHMENT B Request for Proposal 000068 CITY OF ATASCADERO DEPARTMENT OF CON IMTY SERVICES is a 6500 PALMA AVENUE,ATASCADERO,CA 93422 lata Telephone:(805)461-5020' Fax:(805)461-7615 March 3, 1999 OMNI-MEANS,Ltd. 3001 Douglas Boulevd#300 Roseville,CA 95661 Attention: H. Ross Ainsworth SUBJECT: City o Atascadero Route 101/Traffic Interchange Project Study Report Request For Proposal Dear Consultant: The City of Atascadero is requesting proposals from professional engineering firms interested in providing the traffic engineering and other related services required for the preparation of a Project Study Report'for improvements at the Route 101/Traffic Way interchange in the City of Atascadero. BACKGROUND The Route 101/Tra c Way interchange connects Route 101, a High Emphasis Interregional Route, with Trak I Vay, a Route of Regional Significance. The Route 101/Route 41 interchange connect, Route 101 with Route 41, an Interregional Route. The interchanges were built in 1956 as a p of the original Route 101 freeway construction. The northbound ramps were placed to avoid affecting the alignment of El Camino Real. The Route 101/41 northb ound off-ramp terminates on El Camino Real approximately 500' south of Route 41. The Rout r, 101/41 northbound on-ramp connects to Route 41 approximately 200' west of El Camino Real. The Route 101/Traffic Way northbound off-ramp terminates on Traffic Way approximately 100' est of El Camino Real. The Route 101/Traffic Way northbound on-ramp connects to El Camino Real approximately 1,000' north of Traffic Way. The current northbound Route 101 ramp configurations served pre-1980 traffic levels adequately. However,traffic IeN els have increased dramatically in the last 20 years and are expected to continue to grow sti ongly due to projected development within the City of Atascadero. While ROUTE 101/TRAFFIC WAY INTERCHANGE PAGE 1 OF 6 PROJECT STUDY REPORT FP 000069 the northbound ramps have effectively outlasted their 20-year design life,existing and forecasted traffic levels are not and will not be served efficiently with their current configuration. In 1988 the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG)prepared the"Route 101 Corridor Study". The study estimated that the Route 41 interchange will operate at level of services F (LOS F)by 1998 unless significant improvements are made. The study identified the short weaving segments on Route 101 between Route 41 and Traffic Way. The City's"Circulation Element"includes programs for both the Route 101/41 and the Route 101/Traffic Way interchanges. The"Circulations Element Technical Report"prepared by DKS Associates in 1992 projects that future traffic levels along Route 41(west of Route 10 1) could double by 2010 with the largest increases expected on Route 101. Future traffic levels on El Camino Real could increase by as much as 50 percent. In June 1994 a PSR was prepared for the Route 101/Route 41 interchange. Funding for the ultimate improvements identified in the Route 101/Route 41 PSR was programed in the 1998 RTIP. CalTrans has begun the environmental work for the Route 101/41 interchange improvements. Upon further review of the ultimate improvements identified in the Route 101/41 PSR,-and considering the existing deficiencies with the Route 101/Traffic Way interchange,the City has elected to study the Traffic Way interchange possibility of re-configuring the northbound Route 101 ramps at Route 41 and Traffic Way. PROJECT DES('RIPTION AND SCOPE OF WORK The project consists of the consultant preparing a project study report(PSR) for improving the Route 101 interchange at Traffic Way in the City of Atascadero, CA. The PSR shall be prepared in conformance with the California State Department of Transportation's (CalTrans)"Project Development Procedures Manual" (PDPM) and the California Transportation Commission's (CTC)"Guidelines for the Preparation of Project Study Reports", latest editions. Operational evaluations and traffic forecasts shall be performed in.conformance with CalTrans' guidelines. Advanced Planning Studies for new structures shall be performed in conformance with CalTrans' guidelines. Real estate appraisals,right-of-way data sheets and utility information which may be required for the PSR shall be performed in conformance with CalTrans' guidelines. The envisioned scope of work for the PSR consists of the consultant developing and evaluating multiple alternatives for improving the operation and safety of the Route 101/Traffic Way interchange. Due to the close proximity(0.4 miles) of the Route 101/41 interchange,the consultant shall evaluate the effects of the proposed Route 101/41 interchange improvements on the Route 101/Traffic Way interchange. The focus of the PSR will be improvements to the northbound Route 101 on- and off-ramps at Route 41 and Trak Way. The northbound Route 101 ramps have been singled-out due to perceived deficiencies in the currently programed Route 101/41 interchange project. The consultant shall evaluate the operation of both interchanges and the segments of El Camino Real and Route 101 between the interchanges. All improvements ROUTE 101JTRAFFIC WAY INTERCHANGE PAGE 2 OF 6 PROJECT STUDY REPORT RFP 0000'70 recommended by the consultant shall conform to the requirements of CalTrans' Highway Design Manual(HDM), latest edition. If improvements do not conform to the HDM,the consultant shall provide a discus,,'ion of why non-standard features are being recommended. Before compiling the SR,the consultant shall prepare a series of technical working papers for review by a Project D velopment Team(PDT). Each working paper will eventually be compiled into one cor ibined report. The first paper shall describe the existing conditions based on the assumptions i ntifiedbelow. The second shall describe the methodology used for traffic forecasts and provide'a 20-year traffic projection. The third will provide preliminary evaluations of the alternatives developed by the consultant and those specifically identified in this RFP. All three technical working papers shall be distributed to the PDT members before their second meeting. Upon review of the technical working papers,the PDT will direct the consultant as to which alternatives are to be evaluated in detail. If the alternatives selected by the PDT require new structures,the consultant shall prepare the necessary Advanced Planning Studies. The PDT will be co prised of the City Engineer,the Community Development Director, a , representative from i he San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) and representatives from CalTrans. There will be three PDT meetings at the City of Atascadero. The consultant shall prepare and distribute meeting agendas and minutes. The PDT meetings will be open to the public. The consultant shall attend one City Council meeting to present the alternatives chosen by the PDT which are to be included in the PSR. Each alternative evaluated by the consultant should: • Assu ne that the improvements for the Route 101 southbound on- and off-ramps identified as the"Ultimate Improvements Alternative" in the Route 41/101 Interchange PSR dated June 1994 are complete. • Ass e that the eastbound Route 41 improvements are complete. • Spec fically address the movement of pedestrian and bicycle traffic at both interchanges and along El Camino Real in the vicinity of the interchanges • Eval aate the existing and future levels-of-service (LOS) at both interchanges and alon Y, segments of El Camino Real and Route 101 between the interchanges. The sout ierly limit of the evaluation shall be the existing northbound off-ramp for Rou e 41. The northerly limit shall be the existing northbound on-ramp for Traf Fic Way. In addition to the ternatives developed by the consultant for consideration by the PDT,the technical working papers shall include a preliminary evaluation of following alternatives: Ram —ConE olidation-this alternative would consist of combining the northbound Route 101/41 and'the northbound Route 101/Traffic Way on-and off-ramps. The ramps would ROUTE 101[rRAFFICWAY INTERCHANGE PAGE 3 OF 6 PROJECT STUDY REPORI RFP 0000'71 be relocated so they would terminate on El Camino Real at or near West Mall Avenue. The existing northbound Route 101/41 on-ramp and possibly the existing off-ramp would be eliminated. The existing northbound Route 101/Traffic Way off-ramp and possibly the existing on-ramp would be eliminated. The intersection of the relocated ramps with El Camino Real will be controlled with a traffic signal or a roundabout. New Undercrossing; at Atascadero Mall-this alternative would consist of creating a new diamond interchange at Route 101 and Atascadero Mall and eliminating the existing interchanges at Route 41 and Traffic Way. Atascadero Mail would pass under Route 101. The existing northbound Route 101/41 off-ramp may possibly be eliminated. The existing northbound Route 101/Traffic Way on-ramp may possibly be eliminated. The intersection of the relocated ramps with El Camino Real will be controlled with a traffic signal or a roundabout. THE CONSULTANT'S FEE PROPOSAL SHALL INCLUDE A SEPARATE LINE ITEM FOR EVALUATING THIS ALTERNATIVE. _QUALIFICATION AND SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Submitting firms shall be qualified in the preparation of Project Study Reports which conform with the CalTrans"Project Development Procedures Manual (PDPM) and the CTC's "Guidelines for the Preparation of Project Study Reports", latest editions. All work shall be performed under the direction of a civil engineer currently registered in the State of California. The consultant's proposal shall include the following: project 1. A discussion of Consultant's envisioned approach to the p � and a listing of the components to be included in the PSR. 2. Evidence that the firm has the ability and experience necessary to conform with all of CalTrans' PSR requirements. 3. The consultant's fee proposal for preparation of the PSR . 4. Evidence of the firm's previous experience with projects of comparable size and scope. 5. Evidence that the firm has the ability and adequate staff to complete the PSR in a timely manner. 6. A statement that the submitting firm carries general liability insurance in the minimum amount of$1,000,000 and professional errors and omissions Insurance in the minimum amount of$1,000,000. 7. References for a least three similar projects. References shall include a contact name and a CURRENT telephone number for the contact person. ROUTE 1011rRAFFIC WAY INTERCHANGE PROJECT STUDY REPORT RFP PAGE 4 OF 6 000072 8. An organizational chart showing elements of Consultant's complete organization (including subconsultants if required), and identifying those elements to be dedicated to this PSR. 9. A schedule of the process showing the length of time necessary for each process step. 10. A staffing plan showing all persons who will work on or review the project, including any subconsultant individuals who will work on the project. The staff g plan shall include man-hour estimates for each individual working on the project. 11. Staff resumes for all persons who will work on or review the PSR, including subc nsultant individuals. 12. The name of the project manager who will be assigned to this project. 13. The name of individual authorized to negotiate contract on behalf of the firm. 14. A lisl of those items to be delivered to the City of Atascadero by the consultant. 15. A statement that the consultant has reviewed the City of Atascadero Consultant Services Agreement and agrees to, and will be bound by, all provisions thereof. 16. Theconsultant's fee schedule. 17. A sta ement that the consultant can meet the project schedule. SELECTION PROCESS The evaluation process used to qualify and rank the candidates will conform with the One-Step RFP method stated i Section 11 of the California Department of Transportation Local Programs Procedure"LPP95- 7 Re-engineering". A consultant selection committee consisting of the City Engineer,the Community Development Director, a representative of SLOCOG and a representative of Ca Trans will evaluate the proposals using an evaluation sheet similar to that suggested in LPP 95-07. PROJECT SCHEDULE 03/22/99 Submittal date for proposals 04/05/99 End f proposal evaluation period 04/12/99 Council authorization to enter into a Consultant Services Agreement 04/13/99 Notice to proceed ROUTE 101/TRAFFIC WAY INTERCHANGE PROJECT STUDY REPORT RFP PAGE 5 OF 6 i 0000'73 04/26/99 First PDT meeting 05/21/99 Completion of technical working papers 05/25/99 Second PDT meeting 06/08/99 Present list of alternatives to be studied in detail to the City Council 06/25/99 Completion of detailed evaluations 06/28/99 Third PDT meeting 07/30/99 Final draft of PSR TIME AND PLACE FOR SUBMISSION Five copies of the proposal shall be delivered in a sealed envelope to: City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Street, Room 208 Atascadero, CA 93422 Attn: John Neil,Assistant City Engineer The face of the sealed envelope shall show the name of the submitting firm and the project title. NO PROPOSAL FOR THIS PROJECT WILL BE CONSIDERED IF RECEIVED AFTER 5:OOPM ON MARCH 22, 1999. NO FAXED PROPOSALS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Please direct all requests for clarification or questions to: City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Avenue Atascadero, CA 93422 (805)239-3127 FAX(805)239-0758 Attn: John Neil, Assistant City Engineer Resp tfully yo s, D John B.Neil, P.E. Assistant City Engineer AN ROUTE 101/TRAFFIC WAY I N TERCH GE PROJECT STUDY REPORT RFP PAGE 6 OF 6 0000'74 ATTACHMENT C OMNI-MEANS, LTD. proposal 0000'75 - OI' ni•means ENGINEERS • PLANNERS March 22, 1999 City of Atascadero 6500 Palma Street, Room 208 Atascadero, CA 93422 . Attention: John Neil, Assistant City Engineer RE: Cost Effective Project Study Report for the Traffic Way and Route 101 Interchange Our company first opened our offices in 1981. Since that time we have been providing transportation planning and design services from the Tehachapi's and the Central Coast, north to the Siskiyou's. For the past several years we have specialized in the Caltrans process, specifically in Project Study Reports(PSR)through final PS&E documents. Our recent completion of the plans for the Blue Oaks interchange construction on SR 65 ($7.5 million), and the 13 mile Caldwell Avenue Major Investment Study in Tulare County are prime examples. Our approach to developing the interchange Project Study Report(PSR) is based on open communications with the technical staff, and the community at large. We have proposed an optional Community Involvement task which would include two Public Workshops as well as a Project Newsletter, to compliment the Project Development Team meetings you have scheduled. These additional community activities would be designed to assist in converting rumor to fact. Our Team is made up of individuals who commit to active local involvement, are highly motivated, and bring recent experience in projects of this nature. Each professional is highly qualified to complete the technical requirements of this assignment. We have chosen to augment our team with key consultants, these include: • Mr. Robert O. Watkins: Former Caltrans District Director (3,9,12) retired- To provide Caltrans Liaison, Policy and Quality Control Oversight. • Firma: Preliminary Environmental Assessment(PEA) an Environmental firm we have used on numerous projects in San Luis Obispo County, • Twining Laboratories: Hazardous Waste Analysis , a DVBE Firm • Tarvin &Associates: Right of Way Estimates With specific reference to points in the RFP: • We will complete the project within the required schedule. • We have reviewed the Cities Consultant Services Agreement and agree to the provisions contained. • All negotiations will be conducted by Mr.Martin R. Inouye, Principal. • The project deliverables include: • Three(3)Working Papers - - • Draft and Final PSR Document • Access to all work product and records Our approach is complete and comprehensive, and designed to traverse the process smoothly, quickly, cost effectively and within your schedule and budget. Sincerely, n..�..�.,....,.. _, tq R U � R I-MEANS L d. t� rs P rs RAR 2 2 1999 Martin R. Inoue Principal in Charge PUBUG WORKS _ CITY OF ATI;SCRD�RO ' _ MRI(P1662LTR.001) ROSEVILLE REDDING WALNUT CREEK 3001 Douglas Boulevard,Ste.300 434 Redcliff Drive,Suite D 1901 Olympic Boulevard,Ste. 120 Roseville,CA 95661 Redding,CA 96002 Walnut Creek,CA 94596 (916)782-8688 (530)223-6500 (925)935-2230 FAX(916)782-8689 FAX(530)223-9326 FAX(925)935-2247 000076 Contents SECTION I - PROJECT APPROACH....... .......... ..........................1 Project Methodology.....................................................1 Key Issues..................................................................3 WorkPlan..................................................................6 SECTION 2—RELEVANT EXPERIENCE......................................... 15 PSR Experience......................................................... 15 Example Projects....................................................... 19 References...............................................................28 SECTION 3 —FEE PROPOSAL........................................................29 Project Fee/Man-Hours Matrix.......................................30 FeeSchedule ..............................................................31 SECTION 4—PROJECT TEAM ........:.............................................32 Staff Assignments.......................................................32 Organizational Chart............. .....................................33 Resumes..................................................................34 SECTION 5 —PROJECT SCHEDULE...............................................43 SECTION 6 — INSURANCE ...........................................................45 SECTION 7 —AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY................................46 SECTION 8 —PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCESS...........................47 SECTION 9 - COST/QUALITY CONTROL/REGULATORY & UTILITY COORDINATION .............. ......................................49 Project Study Report Page i March 18, 1999 Trak Way/Route 101 Interchange (P1662SCP.001) Section 1 PROJECT APPROACH PROJECT METHODOLOGY The Route 101/Traffic Way Interchange Project Study Report (PSR) is being requested to initiate, and revisit, the identification of needed interchange improvements through the central region of the City of Atascadero. This process will formally identify the intended interchange improvements, determine project costs, define any right of way requirements and utility,-involvement and identify the required studies and environmental process needed to eventually obtain the necessary environmental approval. The overall project approach is presented on the following exhibit. The intent of the PSR is to identify the capacity requirements needed to upgrade the existing Route 101/Traffic Way interchange, so that it can function efficiently with the planned Route 101/Route 41 interchange modifications. The needed interchange improvements will be designed to support the full potential development of the Central Atascadero Area. Consideration will also be given to the development of a grade seperation facility at Atascadero Mall and the provision of a full diamond interchange at this location. This concept would be i considered as congestion relief within the Route 101 corridor. Because a significant amount of time has been expended to date studying the Route 101/Route 41 interchange, and the Route 101 corridor, OMNI-MEANS approach will be to utilize this work to the maximum extent possible. Simply stated, our approach is to develop a series of "sketch plan" alternative interchange concepts prepared on City furnished 100 scale aerial photographs. These "sketch plans" will be reduced to no more than five (5) which will be enhanced to a "schematic" conceptual alternative level, using city furnished planimetric mapping. The schematic alternatives will be preliminarily analyzed and presented for review before the Project Development Team (PDT). Following the PDT review up to two concepts will be evaluated in more detail, and presented in the Project Study Report(PSR) document. A detailed description of our project approach to*initiate, process and successfully complete this PSR is provided in our Work Program that follows a brief analysis of"KEY ISSUES" within this section. Project Study Report Page 1 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Interchange (P1662SCP.001) W H� 0 F�, j b a r/tit 0 t �i■n 0 t Q■a i a t i i lH r f@ i!ip i Q ffi!0 B r t m 6 R�6 i Q i@ i R p n!e n i Q t H i B r r r R r t r 6 w n w r a N o r r r s r a r s t r w r s r n r s r r r s r r w s a H a s a r r n w r a■ r _.Z i t 6 r a f!s r'r r s a Susan J N rr■!■rrnRaiRw!'w■■:rwntrBHirwiwttstriHaiaHlrS �p y� ■a Cu �w� rawtilrt■iat■i■iipl� J= No Q a8a c G ••• 0 ■!i n r■l i ffi n 6 a s at m i r w n s!A a 6 w R.a B,R a if a!n i 6!$!t t A a 6 r t a i i i p � 6 6 a!6 i n i 6 w a!i H i r t ffi Q � PON a n i r i n t ri a as■H!r ffi r ffi r ffin R m r H a a w w c{a n ffi!p i a e a a m!ffi m p a t!!B!6 a w■a a R w r ffi s!w a O d <------------------------ CZ� Risrrerr'eiwareaitarwwltrewer!!wrffiersitaatetata noE ieiit.ArieritirrtRan sniaarRraanise■alemnaranlBmsapmanriiRtraaeaaisi:Sana W a� niaerasesaaemawenasa W Z=Q O ■r■serlwarwn!■■sHrffitltrararwnrerrmarlwrRsrtlit eenrlr UN rrnreamrla@ra!lsSsna � erarraaarrwawrararBarrs/r�asarnateaaratrmtlrtpr itrntresmaeararaapa:■/tQaswnitldn N tans/sea/Barriminraaraaaarraa/@tlSa/atmna i LL� asmArem/aaa/aiir.ipwaaaiaaaaaa 3 &' m w a r i r i r a tl r t i a t I■tl r n i m H n s a t S a a r a a i r r t tl a m n a H t w t m p a a a!n m r H w t n i m w a t a R a H i n A e U • ■aara09aaa6aaa ' BraRartwasmiieaaa4aaaaaama5aaaRasaRaaaaa0aaaaaaaaaa0aaaamaaaaaaa U) a a r s w e i e i a r n w ria @ a,w ffi@.r w i r r R R a@ i a r a a a@ w tl n >O a r a a a ata 6 a@ a r w B a e a@ a w a@ a n H r a a R ~H U . Zj0 Imem, Fo w r!w a r i s w a a a w�.e a a a a a/r p r i m j lu y j a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a r a R a a a a a r a a d 4 a Oei0� a! ///// aw Sariirrsrnrffin prearnlsra �rsarn/mmrsarrmattlalQ Y M • Sssarsatlswa:rs a \\\\\\ p a ;apt Was h Sara rffitmSstans zF �`F1'w QZat UJZ �Fx QLL"¢WpZZ Q��O VO ■Rtaraarawataa nsRiistiiRriiaRiilr fay UV32NNmiww <ag fLL� ¢ �a o8vo��oo� in 3sg 4 s�� aaaaaa zs a N duo =Uo= w°D>W1>50.- ao U WNFXW ws r r r a r■■w is iH rsara■tl m m nffi a i nffi m l ww NOa'�WJZLLO WN QQ" ,ww • •••••• • • ®r i R ffi a a a H s r m a n names v I y Z y ■rr:awaarrrera '' aarmasatdatsamrAy}�Qtrr:tr mm tla " Atilt as LLFY a ea on a ■rrrnswrrmrrs■ aaHrratrr CaN 99 WN LLa .d 066 !ffinwslra■ �� sera Q00UO n I an nns ■ . _ z1 O ■artarntra'aao wrwastrwrrrsrrrmarrrsaamffier Y o0 O _ R on cr g� mow_ ratan . artrwrrre IL O f.a azo0 +�wsraffisraaeaHwwrrartarrwtRa star zN ■tasaasa H ■nt � . Z 0 U 0 0 g �x� a o arrsdaisaatraa ■earsrarrsarr■@arras wv zwrwrawr■ r 0 oZ or. o a W ran . V Z m<aa:yw W 3 w t o -0 Z ■t a t w H ffi a i s w r i i a r r a w i i ffi n■ U a■i s a a a U r ■a a a a i a a a a i a a a 0 own //f/ Z � ag Z ' o Z ■aaaaaaaawaatwar If///f/f/RUaisarsriaaer a a a a a i � Q 3?� arwasmm■ �� aaa 1 \\ \ f zd 1 ��\\\\\ 0 S& z ;� 3 awaaaraearatawlmasssarmiraawsonsa■ 3 _� ■ � � mme■ wmz now Q Z -1S.-F3assa s $ O IL f z w•raaairtarawraraattiratntrrawrrr■ ■trrtnareitiirrarwrrrnals■ S1d3�N0� 0 0007.9 1N3 3AlOANi SNOLL1�213a1SN0 ) ..I.nwwf%'% 39NVH3H31N1 i KEY ISSUES Travel Forecasting/Interchange Concepts Our approach to developing the traffic projections for the Study Area will be to focus on understanding the unique travel patterns associated with this section of the City. Working closely with City staff, we will develop a realistic database of both existing and future land uses within the City. OMNI-NEANS will thoroughly review the 2010 traffic projections generated for the City's Circulation Element update prepared in 1992, and will then forecast travel to the year 2020. Existing travel patterns within the study area will be quantified by use of a comprehensive program of peak hour traffic counts at the critical locations. OMNI-MEANS will also secure new aerial photography(scale lm = 1000m). We propose using these aerial photographs to form the "base maps" for this evaluation, as well as for presentation materials, visual simulation of traffic flow,: and report graphics. Using the aerial photography, along with extensive field observations and data collection, the study area transportation network can be accurately simulated. The existing land use data will be used to disagregate the existing Traffic Area Zones(TAZ)to assist in simulating traffic loading within the Study area. We will then analyze year 2020 traffic conditions, for each Conceptual Alternative Interchange based on any expected land use changes,using the acceptable traffic model. We will complete detailed intersection and.roadway capacity calculations at all critical locations using Traffix computer software. Traffix provides the ability to quickly analyze both intersection and roadway capacities using standard Highway Capacity Manual methodologies. The software provides the ability to analyze unsignalized, signalized, and four-way stop controlled intersections with a common database of intersection information. This analysis will determine both existing and future problem areas that require additional study, and congestion mitigation. These criteria will form the focal point of our interchange analysis: • Route 101/Traffic Way&Route 101/Route 41 • Freeway Operations • Merge/diverge Weaving terminals Ramp and ramp spacing • Freeway interchange ramps-precise location • City Street Connections 0 Widening of Existing Roadways -�1 • Potential Channelization Project Study Report Page 3 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Interchange (P1662SCP.001) - Simulation/Visual Presentation Cation Based upon these future traffic forecasts, a microscopic traffic simulation computer model will be developed for the preferred project alternative specifically to model operations at and adjacent to the future interchange. The models will be developed using VISSIM. VISSIM is a microscopic, driver/vehicle behavior based simulation model that simulates traffic flows based upon constraints such as roadway/lane configuration(including lane widths, sight distance, radii, and grades) signal timing, stop and yield controlled movements, parking movements,pedestrian traffic,and transit stops. These models will generate high quality animation of each of the project alternatives (see following VISSIM example intersection simulation graphic). In addition to real-time interactive animation, these models will provide the following Measures of Effectiveness(MOE): • Overall system delay (sec./veh.) and Level of Service • Isolated intersection delay and Level of Service • Delays per intersection turning movement • Vehicular queue lengths • Congested travel speeds Value Engineering Information obtained from the PDT meetings, along with preliminary cost estimates prepared for each proposed alternative roadway network will be used to refine the initial list of alternatives. A working paper, which illustrates and documents this data will be prepared. A matrix analysis (Value Engineering) procedure will be used to rank each of the alternatives. The matrix will include seven or more categories of impact, which'are quantitatively weighted on a scale by degree of impact. The matrix categories would likely include(but need not be limited to) such factors as: • Engineering feasibility • Safety • Traffic Operations-Level of Service • Environmental constraints • Neighborhood impacts • Cost • Right of way requirements Throughout the entire project OMNI-MEANS will provide professional project management and quality control. The project manager will work "hand-in- hand" with City staff, acting as an extension of your staff. We have prepared a detailed Project Work Schedule, which can be found further along in this proposal under Section 3. Project Study Report Page 4 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Int rchange (PI662SCP.001) 000081 Community Involvement (OPTIONAL) The community involvement process also provides an opportunity for a broader community outreach to encourage participation in these important investment decisions. Besides programming extensive work with the City and other members of the PDT, our proposal includes community workshops, and a Project Newsletter; all designed to involve the public in the process. All team members are experienced in citizen participation. As an option we propose to conduct two Community Workshops, and we would provide a Project Newsletter as we did in Redding for the State Route 299- Sacramento River Crossing Major Investment Study(MIS). The Community Workshops would be conducted at two discreet periods during the study process (coordinated with the PDT meetings): • At the Project Initiation-to secure public comment in the absence of "pre-conceived" solutions. • Following Conceptual Alternative Analysis-in a public comment environment on possible circulation alternatives and solutions. The Project Newsletters would be timed to disseminate the information prior to each public workshop. f L '��--moi' /V_'7"ES0VATVE"3 JPwewnexeerwem ,..� F'.. �NEw�p1NG Ci�1f } S G 1n0CGV v/'e w dd -N yr awl°° }\;'.- N PgOr Volt. d✓ yedf'.prldnd yn d N � 4 4>y•�� s' s Project Study Report Page S March 18, 1999 Trak Way/Route IDI Interchange (P1662SCP.001) 000082 Project Financing(OPTIONAL Funding for the new interchange has not been totally secured. OMNI-Means has been unique in our ability to secure Grant Funds, or Special District Funds to compliment the readily available sources. We are prepared to work on the Cities behalf to secure additional outside fundingtocomplete the financing picture and move this needed interchange forward. OMNI-MEANS is experienced in dealing with public works projects financed through "financing districts". We are the district engineer for a Mello-Roos district which is financing the construction of the $7.5 million Blue Oaks Blvd./State Route 65interchange in City of Atascadero. On this project we first prepared the Project Study Report/Project Report(PSR/PR); then completed the PS&E. The project is currently out to bid. We also prepared the PSR/PR and the PS&E for the Interstate 80/Rocklin Road Interchange modification. A project which was completed for a City of Rocklin Mello-Roos District, within budget, with,NO.contract change orders. We are also experienced in grantsmanship (see.following illustration). We have prepared Grant applications for funds under the State.of California Community Development block grant program. Funds have been secured for projects in Tehama County,City of Weed, and the City of Anderson. System Evaluation The Traffic Way, State Route 41 and Curbaril interchanges with Route 101 are all closely spaced and disjointed. Upon obtaining realistic traffic projections in the downtown area, a more system approach could be the best strategy for identifying the most efficient, environmentally sensitive, and cost effective solution for regional access to US 101. A possible solution could be consolidated ramps, or potentially a completely new interchange. WORKPLAN TASK 1 —PROJECT COORDINATION,MANAGEMENT, AND MEETINGS 1.1 Project Management (Generali. OMNI-MEANS will serve as overall Project Manager for the Route 101/Traffic Way Interchange Project Study Report. The general responsibilities include: • Prepare and keep master project schedule. • Coordinate project status meetings. • Provide coordination with other agencies. • Serve as Key Liaison with all committees and interested persons. Project Study Report Page 6 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 in erchange (PI 662SCP.001) 000083 • Oversee all the project components listed in this Work Plan. • Prepare invoices at the end of each month for previous month's work completed. 1.2 Project Meetings: We will provide all meeting coordination and oversight including the preparation of meeting minutes summarizing actions taken, actions to be taken,responsible party and resolution date. At the outset of this project, a study initiation meeting will be scheduled to establish the Project Development Team (PDT) and the team members; review the scope of work and the project schedule; and establish lines of communications. In addition to the project initiation meeting, two additional PDT meetings have been budgeted, with a fourth, "sketch plan" review, as an option. . 1.3 Project Newsletter(OPTIONAL. On past projects, where the local community may have a profound interest in the process, we have developed a "Project Newsletter" to inform the public and elected officials alike of major activities, milestone events, and key decision points. We would propose to have two newsletters produced. One newsletter would be produced at the project outset, and the second When the conceptual alternatives analysis is completed. 1.4 Public Workshops (OPTIONAL): OMNI-MEANS is experienced at producing the necessary graphics and displays, and at providing the required support to successfully present the project to the public. OMNI-MEANS would conduct two public workshops to be held on the same evening following a PDT meeting. 1.5 Public Hearing. OMNI-MEANS will be available to present the project to the City of Atascadero City Council. TASK 2-DATA COLLECTION 2.1 Data Collection. OMNI-MEANS will obtain copies of all pertinent documents that relate to the study area. These documents could include a copy of the previously approved Route 41/Route 101 PSR, as well as the 1992 Circulation Update to the ' General Plan. These reports will be supplemented with any other study area environmental, planning and engineering documents. f 1 Project Study Report Page 7 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Interchange (P1662SCP.001) 000084 2.1.1 Site Investigation. The project team will field review the entire study area surrounding and adjacent to the existing interchange. Factors will be noted that could affect the schematic and conceptual designs for this location. These factors will include: • Right of Way • Structures • Utilities • Environmental Factors 2.1.2 Obtain and Review Existing Data. We will review available relevant documents supplied by Caltrans, the City of Atascadero, and San Luis Obispo County, and any recently completed environmental and/or engineering documents prepared in the area that may have immediate or future impact on possible schematic alternatives. 2.2 Base Mapping; OMNI-MEANS will utilize existing field surveys, topographic maps, Caltrans and City As-built drawings and other available information to locate existing City and State Right of Way. We will also secure aerial photographs (scale lm=1000m) in "ortho-rectified" format to create metric base mapping in AutoCadd format. 2.3 Working Paper #1. This paper will present the existing conditions within the Study Area. TAS 3-TRAFFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT. OMNI-MEANS will create a small scale traffic model using the integrated computer software Traffix. The model will include both existing traffic volumes,along with projected traffic volume increases resulting from both planned and approved projects in the E rea around the interchange. OMNI-MEANS will utilize and update as appropriate the affic projections generated for the City as a part of their Circulation Element Upd'to in 1992. Traffic area zones(TA2)will be created for areas which represent the pote' tial tributary traffic contributions for the interchange. 3.1 Develop Traffic Forecasts. A small area manual(computer assisted) traffic model will be developed to provide the basis for both existing and future traffic volume forecasts. Close coordination will be maintained with the City Public Works and Planning Departments to insure that the forecasts are representative and acceptable. The following work tasks are required to develop the traffic forecasts. 3.1.1 Refine Existing and Proposed Future Roadway Data. Existing and future roadway system information as obtained in Task 2 will be refined and documented to form �) the basis for the traffic model roadway network. Project Study Report Page 8 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Interchange (PI662SCP.001) 000085 3.1.2 Obtain Existing and Future Land Use Data. Existing and future land use data will be obtained from appropriate agencies, related reference material and field reviews. This data will be divided into separate categories for use in determining land use trip generation characteristics. OMNI MEANS will work closely with city staff in obtaining accurate and realistic land use projections. 3.1.3 Prepare Year 2020 Traffic Forecasts. OMNI-MEANS will create a small scale traffic model using the.integrated computer software Traffix base to create Year 2020 traffic forecasts. The model will include both existing traffic volumes, along with projected traffic volume increases resulting from both planned and approved projects in the vicinity of the study area. Traffic area zones (TAZ) will be created for all areas containing planned and approved projects potentially contributing traffic to study are roadways. 3.1.4 Working Paper#2. This paper will outline, and present the methodology incorporated into the travel forecasting used throughout this study. TASK 4-SUPPORTING STUDIES - 4.1 Traffic Operations Analysis. The City of Atascadero traffic model and/or another areawide traffic model acceptable to the City of Atascadero and Caltrans will serve as the basis for developing all future traffic projections. For this study, the forecast year for developing the necessary interchange improvements will be the year 2020. OMNI-MEANS will confer with the City of Atascadero, SLOCog, and Caltrans, in developing the year 2020 daily and AM and PM peak hour traffic projections. Upon approval of the projected year 2020 study area traffic volumes, the following traffic and transportation issues will be addressed and incorporated in the traffic operations analysis for the PSR: I Existing Safety Deficiencies. Review TASAS Table_B and other reports for operational and safety deficiencies. Project Study Report Page 9 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Interchange ' (P1662SCP.001) 000086 Microscopic Traffic Simulation_ Based upon the approved future traffic forecasts, a microscopic traffic simulation computer model will be developed for each of the project alternatives. The models will be developed using VISSIM. VISSIM is a microscopic, driver/vehicle behavior based simulation model that.simulates traffic flows based upon constraints such as roadway/lane configuration (including lane widths, sight distance, radii, and grades)signal timing, stop and yield controlled movements,parking movements,pedestrian traffic, and transit stops'. :These models will generate high quality animation of each of the project alternatives. In addition to real-time interactive animation, these-models will provide the following Measures of Effectiveness(MOE): • Overall system delay (sec./veh.) and Level of Service • Isolated intersection delay and Level of Service • Delays per intersection turning movement • Vehicular queue lengths • Congested travel speeds Intersection Capacity and Level of Service. Prepare intersection capacity and Level of Service analysis for year 2020 AM and PM peak hours with the project. Analyze year 2020 AM and PM peak operations at the Route 101 northbound and southbound ramp intersections with Traffic Way, and the Route 101 northbound and southbound ramp intersections with Route 41, and El Camino Real. Freeway Capacity and Level of Service. Prepare freeway mainline, ramp junction and weave sections capacity and Level of Service analysis for the year 2020 AM and PM peak hours on Route 101 at the proposed Traffic Way and Route 41 Interchanges. • Buildout of Interchange Area 9 Ramp Terminal Intersections • Main Line Capacity • Freeway Weaving •.. Local Street Capacity 4.2 Prepare Traffic Forecasting Methodology and Operations Working Paper. Following the completion of the above evaluations, a Traffic Operations Analysis report will be prepared and distributed for review to the PDT. 4.3 Initial Environmental Assessment To identify if there are potential environmental issues associated with developing an interchange, an initial environmental assessment consistent with Caltrans policy for preparation of a PSR will be prepared which could include: Project Study Report Page 10 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Interchange (P1662SCP.001) 000087 Background Literature and Contact Agencies. Conduct background literature and record search. Preliminary Environmental Analysis (PEA). Preparation of a Preliminary Environmental .Analysis (PEA) report will be consistent with the direction and guidelines published by Caltrans. The PEA will list potential project related environmental issues or impacts, which could significantly delay the project or effect the viability of any project alternative. The PSR will discuss any additional studies that are needed to complete the environmental approval with any seasonal constraints noted. The required type of environmental -approval and the tentative :schedule for its completion will be identified. The lead agency for the environmental document will be identified in the PSR. Hazardous Waste Sections of the PSR. A Phase I— Initial Site Assessments(ISA), consistent with Caltrans policy for preparation of a PSR, will be prepared. The result of the ISA will be incorporated into the Hazardous Waste section of the PSR. I TASK 5— SKETCH-PLAN"INTERCHANGE CONCEPTS This process begins with the development of a series of"sketch plan alternatives. The sketch plan alternatives.will be generated using the cities 100 scale aerial photographs as a base. These"sketch plans"will be reviewed with the City,Caltrans and the SLOCOG. 5.1 Sketch Plan Concepts.A series of possible interchange solutions will be identified and illustrated on existing City- furnished 100 scale aerial photographs. These plans will be given cursory evaluation,and subjected to a series of traffic and environmental evaluations. 5.2 Traffic Evaluation. The traffic analysis will focus on,and will present a fatal flaw evaluation: 5.3 Environmental Sensitivity. We will take into account relevant available environmental information in the area. This effort is not to conduct any environmental studies,it is an attempt to be sensitive to any known environmental constraints in the area. This is an effort to be prudent and aware of any known concerns. Of special concern will be potential toxic areas. If sensitive environmental concerns do surface as a finding of this task,the analysis will note such factors,and prudent decisions can be made relative to the value of the alternative. Project Study Report Page 11 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Interchange (PI662SCP.001) 000088 TAS 6-SCHEMATIC ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPMENT AND CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS. Following reduction of the"Sketch-plan"concepts,the five(5)remaining schematic conceptual interchange alternatives will be subjected to preliminary review. Based on the baseline information compiled,the five(5)sketch alternatives will be.developed to schernatic levels..A quantitative evaluation.matrix will be created. The purpose is to consider the benefits and drawbacks of each of the schematics explored. The following subta ks describe the process by which alternative schematics will be developed and evaluated. 6.1 Development of Schematic Alternatives With the understanding of the various study parameters,reasonable, feasible schematic conceptual design alternatives will be developed for consideration. Up to five(5)alternative schematics will be developed. These alternatives will be presented on existing AutoCadd base planimetric mapping. Right-of-way(based on available records and maps),structures and other significant physical features will be identified. 6.2 Preliminary Cost Estimates For each of the schematics studied,preliminary cost estimates will be prepared. The improvement costs for each of the alternatives should be straightforward. The right-of-way costs however,could be very sensitive,and outside assistance may be required. Right-of way costs can be estimated on a per square foot basis or unit cost basis,as determined by the City.Construction costs,traffic handling, etc.will be derived using a per linear foot or other acceptable unit. 6.3 Value Engineering(Matrix)Evaluation of Schematics An evaluation matrix will be developed.This matrix evaluation will provide a measure of relative benefit and quantify the various study parameters or factors for each location where the selection of one concept over another is required. These parameters or factors may include: Conceptual Design • Right-of-Way • Utilities • Existing Structures(Community Impact) • Traffic Capacity(Level of Service) • Regional Circulatio • Future Land Development • Environmental Sensitivity • Cost 6.4 Working Paper#3. This paper will present the schematic alternatives and the preliminary analysis,and value engineering 1 evaluation data. Project Study Report Page 12 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Inter'hange (PI662SCP.001) X111 11 n n TASK 7-CONCEPT SELECTION. A meeting will be held with the Project Development Team. In this meeting the matrix evaluations will be reviewed and one or two concepts will be identified for further refinement, and inclusion in the Project Study Report.. TASK 8—REFINE SELECTED CONCEPTS. Following selection of the approved alternatives the following evaluations will be performed. 8.1 Redefine Schematics to PSR Level. The.schematic level interchange alternatives will be enhanced to PSR level documents, based on the technical evaluations, Caltrans Standards, and new metric aerial mapping. 8.2 Structures Advance Planning Study (APS). Each of the interchange alternatives will require that a new Traffic Way overcrossing structure be provided over Route 101. An APS will be required to identify the type of structure needed and the cost to provide each structure. We will develop each APS to conform to current Caltrans standards including showing all design elements in metric scale. 8.3 Advisorv/Mandatory Design Exception Fact Sheet. OMNI- MEANS will identify any advisory and/or mandatory nonstandard design features per Caltrans HighwayDesign Manual (HDM). If any non-standard design features are identified, we will then prepare and process through approval a "Fact Sheet-Exceptions From Advisory/Mandatory Design Standards" in accordance with Caltrans procedures. 8.4 Right of Way. OMNI-MEANS will delineate any areas of additional right of way acquisition as prescribed by each geometric layout and Caltrans PSR requirements.A right of way estimate will be prepared by an independent appraiser acceptable to both City of Atascadero and Caltrans to identify the estimated costs to acquire any additional right of way. Right of Way Data Sheets will then be prepared and included in the PSR. '8.5 Cost Estimate. PSR level cost estimates will be prepared in accordance with the latest guidelines presented in Caltrans Project Development Procedures Manual. ,i Project Study Report Page 13 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Interchange (P1662SCP.001) 000090 TAS 9-PREPARE AND PROCESS PROJECT STUDY REPORT (PSR) 9.1 Prepare Draft Project Study Report (PSR). Following completion of all previous work elements, a Draft PSR will be prepared and up to 30 copies circulated to the PDT and Caltrans District 5 for review. At this time;:support documents will also be finalized and submitted for appropriate approvals. 9.2 Prepare Final PSR. Upon receipt.of all District comments, any remaining issues will be reconciled.and the Final PSR prepared and submitted to Caltrans for.approval. Reproduction of up to 30 copies of the approved Final PSR has been included in the budget. . w j Project Study Report Page 14 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Int change (PI662SCP.001) Section 2 Relevant Experience PROJECT STUDY REPORT (PSR) EXPERIENCE The Caltrans project development process has become a widely recognized specialty for OMNI-MEANS. We have been successful in understanding and navigating the channels and the white water that make up-the Caltrans process. During this time we have developed strong workingrelationships with every Caltrans district from Santa Barbara north to the Oregon border. We have processed numerous Project Study Report/Project Reports, Project Reports, Concept Approval Reports, as well as, Plans Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) documents. The Caltrans process is no mystery. As the following relevant experience profiles will illustrate, we have vast, recent experience, dealing with Interchange Design Project Stud Re ort/Pro'ect Re Study p � ports (PSR), Route Concept Approval Reports (RCAR) on the State Highway System as well as the Interstate System which involves both Caltrans and the FHWA. Our long standing experience working specifically with individual Caltrans districts has extended for over fifteen years. Currently, OMNI-MEANS is preparing PSR's for: • Route 101/Avila Beach Interchange modification in the City of Pismo Beach • Construction of a New Interchange in the City of Tulare, on State Route 99 • Roadway widening for North St. and Riverside Dr. in the City of Anderson • A new interchange on State Route 132 at Bird Road in San Joaquin County • Roadway improvements to Cascade Boulevard in the City of Shasta Lake Major Investment Study for a 13 mile corridor in Tulare County for the Tulare County Association of Governments Other PSR/MIS projects which OMNI-MEANS recently prepared: • US 101/Avila Road Interchange PSR (1995) • Interstate 5/Vernalis Interchange PSR (1996) • Shasta County Interchange Study (17 Interchanges, Pre-PSR level) (1996) • SR 299 - Sacramento River Crossing Major Investment Study (MIS) (1997) • Knighton Road Extension PSR (1997) • James Way/Price Street Extension PSR (1998) • Pine Grove Avenue Extension/Interchange PSR/PS&E(3) - (1998) • Lander Avenue Interchange Modifications PEER/PS&E a> (1998) • Interstate 5/Balls Ferry Road Interchange PSR/PR/PS&E (3) (1998) • Route 101/Fulkerth Road Interchange PSR/PR/PS&E(3) (1998) • Route 65/Blue Oaks Boulevard Interchange PSR/PR/PS&E (2) (1999) (1)Construction Completed (2)PS&E Completed-Construction Bids Advertised-3199(3)OMNI Carrently Preparing PS&E Project Study Report Page 15 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Interchange (P1662SCP.00I) 000092 16 17 ,5 2 18 19 14 CALTRANS PROCESS 3 3 STATEWIDE EXPERIENCE 4 9 2 10 5 1 -PROJECT STUDY REPORT 6 PROJECT STUDY REPORT 7 PROJECT REPORT 8 9 11 C 6 PROJECT STUDY REPORT �7 EQUIVALENT MHS MAJOR INVESTMENT STUDY 12 13 7 8 PS&E PLANS,SPECIFICATIONS &ESTIMATES FEW 20 12 TRAVEL FORECASTING 11 iO BLUE 0 KS -SR 65 INTERCHANGE V/ 2O ROCKLI q ROAD-INTERSTATE 80 INTERCHANGE ✓ ✓ ✓ O3 SIERRA 30OLLEGE BLVD.-INTERSTATE 80 INTERCHANGE ✓ 4O STOCK ON BLVD. -SR 99 INTERCHANGE 5O EIGHT N ILE ROAD- INTERSTATE 5 INTERCHANGE ✓ ✓ 6Q MARCH LANE- INTERSTATE 5 INTERCHANGE ✓ ✓ O7 BIRD RC AD-SR 132 INTERCHANGE ✓ ✓ �. MONTE ASTAAVE. -SR 99 INTERCHANGE ✓ ✓ O FULKER H ROAD-SR 99 INTERCHANGE ✓ ✓ 10 LANDEF AVE. -SR 99 INTERCHANGE i 1 SCRAN ON AVE-,SR 65 TURN CHANNELIZATION 12 AVILA R AD- US 101 INTERCHANGE ✓ ✓ 13 JAMES AY/PRICE STREET EXTENSION ✓- 14 BALLS FERRY ROAD- INTERSTATE 5 ✓ ✓ 15 KNIGHTPN ROAD- INTERSTATE 5 16 PINE GROVE EXTENSION- INTERSTATE 5 17 SR 299 SACRAMENTO RIVER CROSSING 18 INTERSTATE 5/PINE GROVE INTERCHANGE V/ i9 SHAST "COUNTY-STUDY OF 17 INTERCHANGES 20 CALDW LL AVENUE (ROAD 280) omni • Mans FILE:CT014.DS4(121898) ENGINEERS •PLANNERS 000093 aV V V V V V V V _ Y♦� TRANSPORTATION DESIGN •• •- The preparation of Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) is the culmination of the transportation planning and design process. As a complete Transportation Consulting firm OMNI- MEANS provides the broadest range of Transportation services. Recent examples les of our design n ca abilities include: f • SR 65/Blue Oaks Blvd Interchange PS&E • •• • China Gardens Rd Realignment-City of Rocklin • : o Lander Blvd Widening-City of Turlock . • State Route 65 Widening-City of Wheatland ' . - . • • SR 99/Fulkerth Rd Interchange Modification-City • • • of Turlock - - • Interstate 80/Rocklin Rd Interchange Modification City of Rocklin '• • SR 99/Stockton Blvd Interchange Modification- County of Sacramento We provide Construction Management services.as,an adjunct to our design skills. All work products are prepared using ACAD - and SOFTDESK. We would be pleased to meet and discuss your design Ae .,.'-. syy'Gk �aY'i sih � }� ��k'�J'..�"'�4� ,�♦vF'�my�r �4{� �`+�.4,3t�Y�'•�a-, ,�'. :. +'f• ��'4''' r r w � ,p `�f� .�A G''K.F�T` [�Y,�'�r,`�n'*trx.p.s � c m'.tYnJw� ! L i - a '.V 000094 •• 4ti • ch R�( t .;.fit 'r � _i���' cF+ 7� �S�F-• *''""to�o -77 usg, ! 1 ,.i•- t t, Lo _l Ftp t i � y „ T t + T -z coo. O -r Cai �, lid m Q+ o � o m c, cCD a d U2 CD W M. _�. ! -G�. CD UD co N .r= o V V V V ® V V t ' F. n :gymeans 1, • • TRANSPORTATION PLANNING • . Transportation Planning is a Our transportation experience • cornerstone of OMNI-MEANS four includes projects from Central and primary disciplines. We are Northern California, Nevada and •• .. involved in both large and small Oregon. This experience dates • :.:: scale planning projects, ranging back to the first computer from multi-thousand acre Specific transportation models developed • • • Plans to single parcel for the Sacramento region. Over •• • developments. Whether large or the years, numerous other traffic • • small, a common sense models have been developed for engineering approach is always communities throughout California. • employed to determine the extent ' of transportation facilities required Our planning process relies to adequately provide vehicular / heavily on state-of-the-art pedestrian circulation and safety computer hardware and software for these developments. to analyze the all to often •' ' overwhelming complexity of traffic '• flows. We have developed a system that integrates the most commonly used engineering software such as MINOPT, Traffix, HCS, Transyt-717 and Vissim with our GIS, graphics and word processing software. 0 P T W LL 000096 ,� k�'#r tib 77 _ r I ( JAMES WAY / rr Xt _ PRICE STREET Y w � fin.:.- � � "Slt.�`+L i7Y� :r:'•-� x_s'fw^y .+_, ...,�,�n� � EXTENSION P.S.R. . , QBEAQA�1: A :CLIENT \ (s '•- `'., `� CITY of Pismo BEACIi PROJECT DATES --w- l 1996 TO 199 ,- ,r \ 1 0-00 ,go FIR- PROJECT DESCRIPTION OMNI-MEANS pr pared the James Way / Price Street Extension Project Study Report (PS ) in Caltrans District 5. The PSR was developed to j i /, '� •R F address the extension of James Way to the north of the roads current terminus and/or the extension of Price Street to the south of this roads terminus as a fro Cage road to Route 101. Five (5) primary circulation alternatives(Altern fives 1 through 5) and one (1) sub-alternative (Alternative 5A) were addressed in this PSR. Alternative 1 through Alternative 3 considered the extension of only James Way over the OWNER REFERENCE rMSouthern Pacific Railroad tracks and Pismo Creek but varied in how R. DENNis DELEIT, P.E. James Way was 'connected to the local street system north of the CITY of Pismo BEAch crossings. Alternat ve 4 considered the extension of both James Way to DIRECTOR Of Public SERVICES/ the north to Price treet and Price Street to the south to Five Cities Drive CITY ENGINEER as a one-way front ge couplet. Alternatives 5 and 5A considered only the 805/773-4656• extension of Price Street as a two-.way road to the south over Pismo Creek and the railroad to Five Cities Drive. Potential improvements at the Route 101/Hinds Avenue' resulting from each of the alternatives are also PROJECT COSTS identified. $7.31 TO $12.76 MillioN The studied alternatives range in cost based on 1997 construction and right of way from a low of $7.31 million (Alternative 2) to a high of $12.76 million ( Alternative 4). The City of Pismo Beach is the leadOMNI - MEANS agency under CEQA and FHWA is the lead agency under NEPA on this PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE project. The exte 'sion of James Way/Price Street project has been MARTIN R. INouyE proposed as a c ndidate for Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funding by the Cityof Pismo Beach. This project was included in the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments proposed Regional Transportation X Improvement Program (RTIP) list for funding in the 1998 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The proposed STIP funding for this project is $ 1.2 million with the balance of the project covered by Omni • m(aan� the Cityof Pismo Bach funds estimated at$1.6 million. ENGINEERS •PLANNERS h, FILE:MKT018.Ds4(072 98) ©00 ?-J ■ o � o ® 1 SHASTA COUNTY INTERCHANGE STUDY PROJECT DESCRIPTION •• •.• Urbanization is creating dramatic Model `the.. urbanized.. area changes to, Shasta County. As a for 2020 traffic demands. • result, the rural interchanges that are _Determine -the- existing • so common are experiencing facility deficiencies.(NEXUS). . • deteriorating traffic operations. Identify up -to_ five •• _ Future growth will exacerbate the . potential- - improvement situation" - alternatives. Prepare-Value Engineering 1 "6 lot In 1994, the Shasta County Regional Alternative Evaluation. _ Transportation -Commission (RTPA) ..Develop two alternatives. to • retained OMNI-MEANS, Ltd toPSR level design. _ . We• evaluate 13 interchanges along Determine cost and • Interstate 5, State Route 44 and potential "mitigation- fee'_ State Route 299 .in .Shasta County. programs The study included.: ; ,. P . • • • The project was monitored and • coordinated through a Technical Advisory Committee-which consisted u " of representatives from Caltrans :; District 2, City of Redding, City of Anderson City of Shasta Ander, the County.of Shasta. .,.. yr XR4 `t "i..ri- F - The ,project identified improvements • �' 1 totaling $40,800,00. The project was completed several months ahead of z 0- ' T {' Ll 000098 ;^tr N(tN gF i VIiAa 1 I1/[NVCi•. CJw �• Q� S.R. 99 / FULKERTH ROAD p ♦ ji _ ANd y e9_ i�ROAp • 3 PFf � CTrg 9. S.R. 99 / MONTE VISTA AVENUE LOAT1 NS' _ INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION ar,. •, �— — - W� _ _.,_----- ON P.S.R. _ FUIIKEwiM I •I OM wOAO �• enb i — w tt .I xx-r CLIENT Ciry of Tu Rtock • j~•A t. PROJECT DATES 1997 TO PRESENT e i PROJECT ]DESCRIPTION OMNI-MEANS has prepared and processed a Project Study Report (PSR) ''through Caltrans District 10. The PSR was prepared to Evaluate the modification of both the Route 99 interchange with Fulkerth Road and the Route 99 OWNER REFERENCE interchange with Monte Vista Avenue located in the City of BRAd KIAVANO, P.E. ®. Turlock. The 'project is to provide the needed capacity at Ciry of TuRlock both Route 99 interchanges to handle interchange traffic CITY ENGINEER through the year 2020. The estimated cost for the proposed 209/668,5590 improvements and right of way at the Fulkerth Road PROJECT COSTS Interchange h $ 4.95 million and the estimated cost at the FuIkERTN Rd. I/C - $4,950 000 Monte Vista Avenue Interchange for construction and right MONTE VisTA AVE. I/C - $ 1,880,000 wa of .88 million. _ y is $ Both Interchange proposals are Category 4A Projects (interchange reconstruction not OMNI - MEANS requiring a revised freeway agreement but requiring new PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE right of way or substantially increasing traffic capacity). The MARTIN R. INouyE study was prepared for the City of Turlock who is the Lead Agency for implementation of the project. The projects will PROJECT MANAGER be 100% locally funded with no anticipated Federal or State JOSEPh W. WEiIANd, P.E. funding involved. It is anticipated that construction of the proposed improvements will begin during the summer of 1999 for the Monte Vista Avenue interchange improvements and during the spring of 2000 for the Fulkerth Road omni means interchange improvements. ENGINEERS •PLANNER S +s 4; FILE:MKT017.D94(07 198) 000094 Y ( � �' tit fl ats Sv7 BB CYPRESS INTERCHANGE -. --------_ ---=---- --............................ - IMPROVEMENT STUDY ig ® m m r ------I r-m --T,_T,- CLIENT � SHASTA COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PIANNING AGENCY ` PROJECT DATES 1995.1996 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (` CYPRESS INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT STUDY The Cypress Interchange Improvement Study was a key component of OWNER REFERENCE a layer interchange study involving the evaluation of 17 interchanges Bill RAMsdEll along Interstate 5, State Route 44 and State Route 299 in Shasta SHASTA COUNTY R.T.P.A. County. The study includes: (916) 225-5661 • Model the urbanized area for 2020 traffic demands. • Determine the existing facility deficiencies (NEXUS). PROJECT COSTS • Identify up to five (5) potential improvement alternatives. CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE K0 Prepare Value Engineering Alternative Evaluation. $7,500,00 • Develop two alternatives to PSR level design. • Determine cost and potential "mitigation fee"programs. CONTRIBUTING CONSULTANTS Three alternative designs were prepared for evaluation. Each of these WEId - BROWER&ASSOCIATES i three alternatives were ranked using a matrix evaluation methodology based upon Level of Service, Right of Way, Construction Costs, OMNI - MEANS Environmental Sensitivity, and Implementation. Thereferred p PROJECT MANAGER alternative is estimated to cost approximately $4.0 million and would require relocation of existing Interstate 5 ramps, and major roadway Joseph W. WE!IANd, P.E. improvements to the Industrial Street overcrossing and adjacent intersections The project Technical Advisory Committee consists of Caltrans District 2, City of Redding, City of Anderson, City of Shasta Lake and the County of Shasta professional personnel. omni • IM�1(�CoQ�� ENGINEERS -PLANNERS -•"-FILE:MKT009.DS4(0nW7) 0®01®0 WS cols w cu:<cw ARROYO ° } GRANDE I"d '•� -� wrtv-c-:.a CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE 'OPTION2 "LONG RANGE CIRCULATION STUDIES" OPTIONS \ OPTION 3 CLIENT CITY Of ARROYO GRANdE PROJECT D kTES AuqusT 1996 MAY 1996 PROJECT DESCRIPTION --=� r �F4eA_ong Range Circulation Study was prepared by OMNI-MEANS for the City of Arroyo Grande to present the analysis and recommendatios for alternative extension alignments of State Route 227 through the City to US 101 and alternative improvement t " modifications to the US 101/Brisco Road interchange. OWNER REFERENCE ®� RobERT HUM Through a series of working papers, public workshops and public CITy of ARROYO GRANdE hearings, a large range of alternatives for the future alignment of CiTy MANAGER State Route 22 and for the modification of the US 101/Brisco Road 805/473.5404 interchange were explored, developed and analyzed. A total of 15 alternative alignment options were eventually explored and analyzed through this st idy process. In addition, midterm through the study PROJECT COSTS process, more detailed analysis of alternative modification $31,000,000 - $32,000 000 J improvements o the US 101/Brisco Road interchange was also requested. A total of 3 alternatives were eventually studied before a selection of c preferred modification to the interchange was OMNI - MEANS recommended. PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE MARTIN R. INOUY E P P In addition to these specific improvement analyses, OMNI-MEANS incorporated these recommendations into an update to the City's Circulation EI ment of. the General Plan. Also, supporting environmental documentation, including the preparation of an Initial Study, as well as an update to the City's existing Traffic Fee (AB 1600) Program were i icluded. omni • mIU (s T1s � 3 ENGINEERS •PLANNER FILE:MKTOI5.DS4(072198) q g 00010" sr c' t 4 • aC �ran� _ SOUTHEAST- ROCKLI N `- ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ` PSR/PR/PS&E Project Description Funded through a $4+ million Mello Roos District, the improvements to the roadway network in Southeast Rocklin involved reconstruction - of both city streets and the Rocklin Road/ Interstate 80 interchange. The Interstate 80 interchange work included a PSR, Project'Report and Plans and Specifications to authorize-the relocation"of the EB" off-ramp, reconstruction of the Rocklin Road channefization beneath the Interstate 80 undercrossing and reconstruction of tha- WB- Interstate 80 on-ramp. The focal street improvements included traffic CLIENT signalization along Rocklin Road, a new-bridge crossing over Secret CiTy of Rock€iN Ravine Creek and the realignment of China Garden Road. PROJECT DATES A compact steel girder bridge design was selected for the Secret 1994 TO PRESENT Ravine bridge crossing to meet the following project specific CONSTRUCTION challenges 1997. 1998 • The new bridge structure had to tie into an existing road facility st while maintaining an appropriate and safe design speed. • The structure had to maintain an appropriate vertical freeboar clearance above the 100-year flood plain elevation. • The use of false work was disallowed in order to preserve a: vegetative structure of the riparian corridor and minimize adverse impacts to existing wildlife habitat. • Construction was limited to a window of opportunity which would avoid impacting the fall steelhead and chinook salmon run (October through November), the spring raptor nesting nesting (April through July) and the normal.winter high flow period I _ (October through April) . OWNER REFERENCE CAR€OS URRUTIA Sx ati_•- ROCkliN CITY MANAGER (916) 632.4050 - CONTRIBUTING CONSULTANTS ANdERSON CONSUCTiNG GROUP } JACk A. MEANS ANd ASSOCIATES PROJECT COSTS - WiTI4iN CiTy R/W OMNI - MEANS $1,680,000 PROJECT MANAGER W!Tk !N CA€TRANS R/W DOUGkAs J. RIES, P.E. 5 $1,790,000 ' w COMbiNEd PROJECT $3,470,000 omni 0s mZ. ENGINEERS•PLANNER FILE:MKT011.QS4(0B2097) 000102 - ' r 6 71 BLUE OAKS / STATE ROUTE 65 INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION SOUTH PLACER COUNTY may/^" ' 1� 1 I `�, •�' - n r.^ Q o�� �,�j :� u � -``3,,. 3 ,' ✓ �:s. ,r5 3'c`r'�'.y�i^4}?r't�a. ,u- r:� •3 t, <: CLIENT HiqhWAY 65 JOINT POWERS r , AUThORIT ~F Construction of the State Route 65 / Roseville bypass in 1987 included a li ited access interchange at Blue Oaks Boulevard. The interchange's configuration provided access from State Route 65 to the west only, via an at-grade intersection at Washington Blvd./State R ute 65 and via a fly-over from State Route 65 to Blue Oaks Blvd. A cess to the City of Rocklin to the east was denied by PROTECT DATES this configuration. 1996 - 1998 J OMNI-MEANS was retained to correct this deficiency and develop CONSTRUCTION F access at this location for all directions of travel. As part of the 1998 - 2000 Project Stud Report/Project Report (PSR/PR) planning process, OWNER REFERENCE OMNI-MEAN developed six interchange alternatives each of which would upgrade S.R. 65 within the project area to freeway HighWAy 65 JOINT POWERS standards by providing a full access interchange and allowing the AUThORiry closure of th S.R. 65/Washington Blvd. at-grade intersection. LARRY PAc,EI e A preferred interchange design concept was identified in the SECRETARY PSR/PR which would be constructed in two phases. The interim PROJECT COSTS construction ohase provides for a full interchange which utilizes the existing interchange facilities and provides the desired access to $ 7,960,000 .. the east of S.R. 65 along Blue Oaks. The second construction phase would provide for additional capacity through the interchange CONTRIBUTING CONSULTANT`_ from Blue Oaks Blvd.when travel demands dictate. ImbSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. OMNI-MEA S processed the PSR/PR and completed the preferred OMNI - MEANS interchange design to the Geometric Design approval level. Traffic PROJECT MANAGER analysis, pro ect surveys, transportation design, utility coordination and environ ental studies were all components of the work JOSEPh W. WEJANd, P.E. 1 elements. x OMNI-MEAS is completing plans, specifications and estimateso omni • means (PS&E) with construction scheduled for late summer 1998. ENGINE ERS -P L A N N E F FILE:MKT006.DS4(08 7 000103 S ` NNIOHON ROAD EiPERCNANOE CONCEPT ONLY KN I GHTON ROAD � o O° ❑ � ❑ ea. CLI ENT - COUNTY Of ShASTA PROJECT DATE, r f 1997 1 PROJECTCOSTS OS TS PRASE 1 - 1998 STIP - $ 5,000,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION KNIGHTON ROAD EXTENSION OWNER REFERENCE OMNI-MEANS prepared the Project Study Report (PSR) to RiCNARd UrzbAN document the roadway and interchange improvement COUNTY Of ShASTA process by the County of Shasta and the California Department of Transportation between the Interstate 5 / SUPERVISING ENGINEER ~` Knighton Road interchange and Airport Road in the County (530)225.5661 of Shasta. The improvements proposed in the PSR include the alignment of the Knighton Road Extension, the location of two new bridges and reconstruction of the Interstate 5 OMNI MEANS interchange . at Knighton Road. The first phase improvements, designed for year 2010 traffic conditions, PROTECT MANAGER will include a two lane roadway and minor interchange JOSEph W. WEifANd, P.E. alterations. A ' 47 y^ omni • m(B ap ENGINEERS •PLANNE = FILE:MK7013.DS4(110797) 000104 REFERENCES Jim Larsen Bill Ramsdell Executive Director Project Manager Tulare County Association Shasta County Regional Transportation of Governments Planning Agency (559) 733-4881 (530) 225-5661 Gary Otremba Brad Klavano Special Funded Projects Director of Public Works Caltrans District 2 City of Turlock (530) 225-3314 (209) 668-5542 Mr. Carlos Uruttia John Wallace City Manager City Engineer City of Rocklin City of Arroyo Grande (916) 632-4050 (805) 544-4011 James Brown Scott Morgan Assistant City Engineer City Manager City of Tulare City of Anderson (559) 685-2300 X 4275 (530) 378-6646 -Laurie Barton (209) 948-7072 Special Funded Projects City Manager Caltrans District 10 City of Shasta Lake (209) 948-7072 (530) 275-7040 Project Study Report Page 28 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 In ferchange (P1662SCP.001) 00®105 ,ectioli 3 Pee Proposal Project Fee Our fee for this project is$75,000. This task cost breakdown is as follows: Required Optional Items Items Task 1 Project Coordination $5,055 $9,180 Task 2 Data Collection $12,760 Task 3 Traffic Model $5,710 Task 4 Supporting Studies $8,765 Task 5 "Sketch-Plan" Concepts $3,270 . Task 6 Schematic Alternatives $10,297 Task 7 Concept Selection INCLUDED Task 8 Refine Concepts $24,513 Task 9 Prepare&Process PSR Document $4,630 TOTAL $75,000 $0,180 The New Undercrossing at Atascadero Mall would have a resulting fee of. If the alternative is eliminated at the Schematic alternative level: $2,885 If the alternative is carried through to the PSR document: $15,135 Project Study Report Page 29 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Interchange (P1 662SCP.001) 000106 @ u � m LLI N M N m p7 W Z t O E ~ N to O O eO+fNo)O p 40 0 NN N U W F-o C F m N C m.a m r'Q rNN N N NW y H < d M WE. to C O O W N O to m H D O c O w W O p O F a m m m m c = o Q v a m u m w d e _ c m p cc m M,. N « N N00cm co m m 0 r M 3 to w 0 � e m O C C m NM r rr m rr {My7� 3 a c A L N m W N G a m O ? co y C c c a e .0 C1 N c amm.A=zmam 3aaNoxac GUOrcy0.. ^'oco°' mcQm° a3`m tu- yf❑A`oam mUA�2 wmo n aXo ` amyCL C 12c U c❑ 0 m 0EO a oED 0 (L ay❑.n su - CL O aCA ~ yLL 12 oc o m 0m oo W CL c m O C 0 c N ao d0'u 4w E aEw CL x Y y a mm ac1 za000. yt- 0 w yo0 fN7FOAm 0. aa N M V N Yy '• N eq O u'f F N M � N r t+! r N M 7 r lytC f"! 7 N r N N N Cl {V t7 V O vi C4 q (G m m m W aY aD O p p1 V H < N M u! tp M O 000107 O O O O O O co 0 V t'1a m � •R O F !O/► HN 49 p V O i N O N �0 N to O LnO M - co W eN N W W Wm _ VY 07 y O t n O O 0 0 O O O O O N 10 O O N 1[7 0�!O O O t 0 ►. t0 et O M O N O O 1l!N r O tD C O O M C O W tD t7i et t0 coN N O M W to W fr Neter Net to e< O W n R F 1)t G Metes eton CM0�y'o� Cl) CL CL P% CA et r .O of M V p e' W /A Hl N►M W N W d�N' `p y� e!r=N t0 e�'7 N m '(L. O h w M N W W p IA W W N W V!W W M 4y K!H►Vi 69 W!9 44 N L t 10[70 �� O O O O V t0 '� p C4 00 w ww C* Z d d N _ m � O C O ti y O Q 14tl H O C W V y I W � I ci 3 w Nv► o 0 U E o 0 0 0 7 a w w w 1ci d' lL W c o o j Mi. Val m O W ``" Y Oto too G in is to to W m � m h 9 n m N C m h O m m E `0 2 01 J C c 9 s m umi o m e m e `�► S '� ma (ac ia ¢ c a U) s� a a O / v J d N m C m m N W ® m eo y w a E m p o O o LL T N 9 N o 3 c e o _ E y1 t avi m —' _`o = US) lao A"° _co to m '°'o u R > > u `m o Q E o m y v m > j m y a a o A c m a 0 rt C U E m m ¢ m $y A m m u Z c m O = Q u m ° °i! c f. v as `mm o 7- o m LL ti n> L° s a a H m o n U u " x 3 E m o ii y7 � s m3-0: x v o � a oz3c7 m powa w S' w e E n� wc t' m mtn � Ul w m m R N R u u u u U n e e m O O m m 3 8 5 R i c 3 3 n o a m y x e 0 > a' q o O m d 2 m a a . n � a` azn' n' Oom3 hca� o' o' a3 m � w �- w vl � a > 3 � zmczc7 n as Y r N M O N Iq r N M V Mf N M " N N PI r N w Q N M Q N N R N N N V! O Y Y) Yf b m m t0 tC tC a0 !D ml 00 W tD U f r. N M V O t0 O 07 000108 OMNI-MEANS,Ltd ENGINEERS.&PLANNERS FEE SCHEDULE FOR ENGINEERING-SERVICES PROFESSIONAL STAFF RATES' Project Manager 1 -4 $85.00 to $120.00/hr Engineer ' 1 -5 $70.00 to $100.00/hr Traffic Engineer 1 -5 $70.00 to $100.00/hr Traffic Observer 1 -2 $15.00 to $20.00/hr Planner 1 -4 $65.00 to $90.00/hr Party Chief $65.00 to .$75.00/hr Surveyor 1 -4 $50.00 to $90.00/hr Designer 1 -2 $70.00 to $90.00/hr Technician 1 -4 $50.00 to $70.00/hr Clerical 1 -3 $35.00 to $55.00J1ir 2-Person Survey Crew $95.00 to $140.00/hr 3-Person Survey Crew $135.00 to $225.00/hr REIMBURSABLES Reimbursables include, but are not limited to, in-house reproduction, travel subsistence, special consultants, outside purchases and services,and other subcontracts. These are charged at 1.20 x cost. BILLING RATES Billing rates include overhead, equipment, space rental, etc. Billing rates are subject to increases due to union agreements and salary increases. Principal's time on projects is chargeable up to $135.00 per hour; Associates time on projects is chargeable up to$120.00 per hour.. EXPERT WITNESS RATES Deposition and trial to ony$200 per hour, 4 hour'minimum. Meetings and preparation at regular bill out rates. A late payment FINANCE CHARGE will be computed at the periodic rate of 1.5%per month which is an ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE of 18%, and will be applied to any unpaid balance commencing 30 days after the date of the original invoice. Effective December 1, 1998 (FORMS/FEESCHMM s 000109 Section • 4 Project Team STAFF ASSIGNMENTS The Principal-in-Charge will be Mr. Martin R. Inouye. . Marty will also lead the Team in the community involvement and public policy areas. Marty has been with the firm since it's founding in 1981. Marty has extensive experience within San Luis Obispo County and with Caltrans District 5, specifically with the cities of. Marty is the Principal in Charge on the Avila Beach/Route 101 interchange PSR project, which we are now completing. Joe Weiland, P.E., is the Project Manager who will serve as the primary contact with the City of Atascadero during the contract period. Joe has been with OMNI-MEANS for over nine years and is one of the foremost experts in the development of Project Study Reports to Caltrans requirements. Joe has been actively involved in processing projects through Caltrans since 1990. Within the past year, he has completed, through approval, six (6) 1998 STIP (and amendment) qualifying PSR's, each, of which involved new or modified interchanges on the Caltrans system, and several which included significant roadway segments as well. These included the following: • SR 65/Scranton Road Intersection Improvements-City of Porterville (1999) • James Way/Price Street Extension PSR-City of Pismo Beach(1997) • Interstate 5/Balls Ferry Road PSR- City of Anderson (1998) • Pine Grove Avenue Extension PSR-City of Shasta Lake (1998) • Flores Avenue Access Road PSR-Tehama County (1998) • Interstate 5/Knighton Road PSR- Shasta County (1997) -Joe was also the project manager on both the SR 299 -Sacramento River Crossing Major Investment Study(MIS) and the Shasta County Interchange Study (17 interchanges on Interstate 5, SR 299,and SR 44)both prepared for the Shasta County Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA)and Caltrans. Paul Miller will serve as Transportation Planner for this important project. With over 10 years of experience in transportation planning and traffic modeling, Mr. Miller will be responsible for the travel forecasting and management of technical analysis for this element of the study. Paul will be supported by Ravi Narayanin, our transportation modeler. Civil Engineering expertise will be required to evaluate public improvements and their cost; Mr.Doug Ries and Mr. Darren Zeillemaker will provide this specialized skill. Doug, was the project manager for the modification to the Interstate 80/Rocklin Road interchange project which was recently completed in the City of Rocklin, and he is currently the project manager for the Monte Vista/State Route 99 interchange modification PS&E in the City of Turlock. In each instance Doug was assisted by Darren who is a CADD designer with an LSIT survey background as well. J Project Study Report Page 32 March 18, 1999 Trak Way/Route 101 Interchange (PI662SCP.001) 000110 Bridge Design is a recent addition to our service capabilities. We were fortunate to lure Mr. Robert Morrison, Jr. to OMNI from CH2MhM, where he was project manager for a segment of the Carquinez Bridge retrofit project, amongst others. Bob will prepare the Advanced Bridge Planning Studies required for this PSR. Each ofour projects is required to adhere to our Quality Control process that is a part of our int real Project Management document presented in Section 8 of this proposal. Mr. Ron Boyle, our Chief Engineer, and author of this document will serve as the Quality Control Officer on this project with respect to internal process and standards. Mr. Robe Watkins, former Caltrans District Director (District 3) will provide project oversij Jit, and assist, as necessary, in the areas of Caltrans Liaison and policy adherence. The Pieliminary Environmental Assessment(PEA) will be prepared by David Foote of FIRMA, located in San Luis Obispo, who has prepared the same document, for many of our PSR and related transportation documents. The Phase I- Initial Site Assessment(ISA) for the hazardous waste analysis will be prepared by Twinning Laboratories, of Fresno, who we have used on several similar projects. Right of way cost estimates will be provided by Bob Tarvin of Tarvin & Associates. CITY OF ATASCADERO TRAFFIC WAY/ROUTE 101 INTERCHANGE PROJECT STUDY REPORT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART CITY OF ATASCADERO PROJECT DIRECTOR PROJECT John Neil'P'E- DE P.E. D OPMBJT TEAM Assistant City Engineer Engineer •S.'.O.C.O.G. horns PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE munify Devebpment •Oi r Martin R.Inouye QUALITY CONTROL VALUE ENGINEERING Robed O.Watkin:,P.E. PROJECT MANAGER MHM Ronald G.Boyle,P.E. Joseph W.WeilandP.E. , ROADWAY ALIGNMENT BASE/FUTURE ENVIRONMENTAL JF RIGHT OF WAY YEAR CONDITIONS DEVSAPMENfDouglas J.Ries,P.E. ASSESSMENTS DorrenT.Zeillemaker BobTorvm Paul J.Miller Dmid Foote ,. JosephW.Weiland,PTARJINJ&ASSOCIATES Ravi K Nkmyanan FIRMA Douglas J.Ries,P.E BRIDGE STUDIES Robert Monisan Jr.P.E.,SE . HAZARDOUS WASTE fD� ORTATION - - ANALYSIS STIMATING Harry Moore,P.E.• J.Ries,P.E. - TWINING LABORATORIES Zeillemak, *MBE/WBE/DBE Firms raEneeamDsym®q - .�omni• m® cns ENGINEERS-PLANNERS Project Study Repon Page 33 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Interchange (P1662SCP.001) 000111 MARTIN R. INOUYE PRINCIPAL PROJECT RESPONSIBILITY: Principal-in-Charge Martin R. Inouye serves as Principal-in-Charge and/or Project Manager on projects involving the Caltrans System. Mr. Inouye brings a thorough knowledge of the Caltrans process and existing close working relationships with Caltrans Districts 3,S, and 10, as well as local jurisdictions from Santa Barbara north. Mr. Inouye will provide strong project management and communication skills, utilizing the latest management software to oversee project schedules, critical path and project budget. Mr. Inouye is a stickler for maintaining close project communication with all key players. Problems,issues and details never get resolved by being ignored. When significant concerns arise,they will be promptly communicated and followed to resolution. P Y EDUCATION: Master of Urban Planning, Transportation California State University, San Jose—1976 Bachelor of Science,Environmental Planning University of California,Davis- 1974 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: Institute of Transportation Engineers American Planning Association EXPERIENCE: As Senior Vice President,Mr. Inouye serves as Principal-in-Charge and/or Project Manager for a broad range of transportation and environmental planning projects. In this capacity,Mr. Inouye is responsible for administration and the quality of all projects in which he is involved. Mr. Inouye also specializes in the Caltrans project approval process in District 3, 5, and 10. In Caltrans District 10 alone,Mr. Inouye is managing,has managed, or has participated within the past 5 years the following projects: • James Way/Price Street Extension PSR • I-80/Sierra college Boulevard Interchange-PSR • State Route 65/Blue Oaks Boulevard Interchange-PS&E • State Route 132/Bird Road Interchange-PSR • State Route 12/Thornton Road-PS&E • State Route 99/Monte Vista Interchange-PS&E • US 101/Avila Road Interchange-PSR Project Study Report Page 34 March 18, 1999 Trade Way/Route 101 Interchange (P1662SCP.001) 000112 JOSEPH W. WEELAND, P.E. ASSOCIATE PROJECT RESPONSIBILITY: Project Manager Mr. Weiland will be re,sponsible for the day-to-day coordination of all project engineering and consulting related to preparation of transportation studies and all phases of planning design and management of traffi engineering and the Caltrans Project Study Report/Project Reports, Project Reports, and Conce t Approval Reports. Mr. Weiland has over nine years of engineering experience with spec"is expertise in project coordination and execution with various public agencies including Caltrans. J e has been directly responsible for the preparation and processing of the Interstate 5/Bird Ro td Interchange PSR/PR and the Bird Road/SR 132 Interchange PSR both in San Joaquin County. SR 299 — Sacramento River Crossing MIS as well as numerous other Project Study Report/Project Reports, Project Reports, and Concept Approval Reports for projects in various Caltrans Dis icts. He has developed and nurtured professional relationships with key Caltrans personnel in each district. EDUCATION: Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering California State Univ rsity, Chico- 1989 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: Registered Civil Engineer, California#C53755 PROFESSIONALAFFILIATIONS: Institute of Transpo ' tion Engineers EXPERIENCE: Following is a selection of specific projects in which Mr. Weiland was actively involved: State Route 299—Sacramento River Crossing MIS (District 2). Provided day-to-day project management of all elements of the MIS. Provided liaison between the consulting team and agency. Shasta County Interchange Studies (District 2). Preparation of transportation studies and up to five schematic improvement alternatives and two final improvement alternatives for fourteen(14) interchanges in Shasta County. Interstate S/Vernalis',(Bird.Road)Interchange Project Study Report/Project Report(District 10). Preparation of Project Study Report/Project Report for a new interchange in San Joaquin County. Blue Oaks Boulevard/State Route 65 Interchange Improvements Combined Project Study Report/Project RepoI and Project Report(District 3). Concept design and evaluation of five interchange modification alternatives on State Route 65 in Placer County. State Route 99/Fulk rth Road and State Route 99/Monte Vista Avenue Interchanges Project Study Report(District 10). Combined Project Study Report for two City of Turlock Interchanges. PRESENTATIONS: ITE. Salt Lake City District 6 annual conference, 1997; State Route 299 Sacramento River Crossing j! Major Investment Study. Project Study Report Page 35 March 18, 1999 Trak WayRoute 101 Interchange (P1662SCP.001) 000113 RONALD BOYLE,P.E. ASSOCIATE " PROJECT RESPONSIBILITY: Quality Control As Project Manager/Project Engineer for OMNI-MEANS,Mr. Boyle manages entire projects and/or performs as the primary design engineer where his specialties in roadway and drainage design are required. In this capacity, Mr. Boyle initiates and maintains,extensive contact with key engineers and officials or other organizations and companies as necessary to ensure project goals are met within budget and on schedule.Using project management software, Mr. Boyle develops and tracks project schedules and budgets, and monitors design for conformance with Agency standards and policies. As Project Manager for State Highway PS&E's, Mr. Boyle brings established skills in working with Caltrans and Local Agency staff. EDUCATION: Bachelor of Science - Civil Engineering California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, 1982 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: American Public Works Association Floodplain Management Association PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS Registered Civil Engineer, California No. 46387 EXPERIENCE: Mr. Boyle has been responsible for all phases of roadway project completion including Project Study Report/Project Reports, Specific Road Plans, drainage studies, construction documents, and construction management. Projects have ranged in size from small street improvement projects, such as street widening and signalization, to regional masterplans and improvement plans for freeway interchange modifications. Representative projects include: • Bird Road and Interstate 5 interchange in San Joaquin County ($9.6 million est.); • City of Stockton Citywide Transportation Infrastructure Assessment; • Sunrise Boulevard and US Highway 50 interchange modifications ($1.6 million); • Blue Oaks and Highway 65 interchange modifications (9.4 million est.); • Stockton Boulevard and State Route 99 off-ramp modifications ($1.4 million); • State Highway 49 widening in Auburn, California ($0.8 million); • PS&E and Construction Management for Harvest-Finney-Pirone Roads near Modesto, California ($1.6 million); • Fair Oaks Boulevard and Eastern Avenue Intersection Improvements. _r Project Study Report Page 36 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Interchange (P1662SCP.001) 000114 ROBERT MO SON,Jr., S.E. PROJECT MANAGE PROJECT RESPONSIBILITY: Bridge Engineer EDUCATION: M.S. Structural Engineering, University of California at Davis B.S., Civil Engineering, Oregon State University PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: Civil Engineer: Nev da, California, Oregon Structural Engineer: California, Oregon EXPERIENCE: Mr. Morrison has d igned bridge and overcrossing structures for Caltrans and cities and counties in California. He has also designed seismic retrofits for several major California viaducts and bridges and seismic prioritization of 2,600 bridges for the Oregon Department of Transportation. His related California bridge experience includes the following projects: Lead structural engineer for Caltrans "On-call" seismic retrofit Project 604. The project included the seismic retrofit design of five major overcrossing and viaduct structures along the-Interstate-280 (I- 280) China Basin Viaduct and their respective ramps following the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Lead engineer for the seismic retrofit the Interstate 80 Carquinez East Bridge approach, a 12-steel- plate-girder-span, and six-span on-ramp structures, and design engineer for the five-span, 3,350-foot, double cantilever welded steel through truss main structure in Contra Costa County. Design engineer for 'dening Milliken'Avenue Overcrossing in San Bernardino County. Lead engineer for Est Second Street widening designs of Sulpher Springs Creek Bridge and West Channel Road Unde crossing in the city of Benicia. Bridge engineer for eismic retrofit strategy development for the four-span steel plate girder and precast box girder. uscoy Overcrossing Railroad Structure in San Bernardino County. Project manager and lead bridge engineer for the rehabilitation of the historic five-span, 304-foot Trinity River Bridt a at Lewiston in Trinity County. The structure consists of steel plate girder and riveted steel plate g' der approach spans on steel bents. The main span is a 180-foot historic Baltimore Petit steel truss bride built at the turn of the century. Project manager and lead bridge engineer for the upgrading and rehabilitation of the Mattole River Bridge at Lindley Rad in Humboldt County. The bridge is a 230-foot-long, suspension cable bridge with timber deck and is listed on the National Historic Register. Lead engineer for design of Tomki Creek Bridge in Mendocino County. Lead engineer for widening of the four-span Commanche Creek Bridge on Midway in Chico, Ca. Project manager and lead bridge engineer for the replacement of the historic Klamath River Bridge ion Walker Road in iskiyou County with a three-span, 374-foot, post-tensioned concrete box girder J structure. Project Study Report Page 37 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 1011 erchange (P1662SCP.001) 000115 PAUL JOSEPH MILLER TRAFFIC ENGINEER PROJECT RESPONSIBILITY: Project Transportation Planner Traffic Impact Studies-Served as Project Manager/Project Engineer for 80 traffic impact.studies for both large and small scale commercial, residential, and industrial developments throughout the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley region. Projects completed within the following jurisdictions Sacramento, Placer, El Dorado, Nevada, Shasta, Lassen, Tehama, Colusa, Calaveras and Merced Counties, and the Cities of Vacaville, Roseville, Sacramento, West Sacramento,Redding, Chico, Oroville, Auburn, Woodland, Stockton, Modesto,Dixon, Newman,Anderson, Peteluma, Rio Vista and Riverbank. Assisted with traffic impact studies in the Cities of Ontario, Santa Ana,Newport Beach, West Covina, Upland, Fullerton, Anaheim in the Southern California area. Transportation Planning/Computer Traffic Modeling-Three years experience as Project Manage/Project Engineer for traffic modeling projects using MINUTP traffic modeling software. Responsible for updating and managing the City of Vacaville's General Plan traffic model. Modified and expanded the City of Vacaville's traffic model in conjunction with numerous project development EIR's and traffic impact studies. Modified the El Dorado Hills Specific Plan traffic model to simulate General Plan buildout conditions. Developed a traffic model for the East Main Street Corridor Study in the City of Woodland. EDUCATION: California State university, Fullerton Bachelor of Arts, Business Administration-August 1986 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) -Associate Member American Planning Association(APA) - Member Surveyors, Architects and Engineers(SAGE) -Member EXPERIENCE: TJKM Transportation Consultants: As an Associate Engineer, Mr. Miller was responsible for management of all transportation projects in the Sacramento office. During his six year tenure, he served as Project Manager for traffic signal design, traffic operations, geometric design, traffic modeling, traffic impact analysis,circulation planning analysis and parking demand studies. Weston Pringle and Associates.As a Traffic Engineer, Mr. Miller was responsible for the direction of numerous traffic impact analysis and transportation planning projects. PRESENTATIONS: ITE. Fresno annual conference, 1996; Nevada County Transportation Design Management. Project Study Report Page 38 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Interchange (PI662SCP.001) 000116 DOUGLAS J. RIES, P.E. DESIGN ENGINEER PROJECT RESPONS ILITY: Project Designer As Project Engineer,'Mr.Ries has been the primary engineer responsible for the preparation.of PS&E documents for sever I interchange and roadway projects. He specializes in roadway and drainage design utilizing CADsoftware. He has also been involved in the preparation of drainage studies for several interchange, roadway and development projects. EDUCATION: BSCE Montana State University, 1987 Civil Engineering PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: California#C 47768 1991, Civil Engineering EXPERIENCE: Most recently, Mr. Ries has served as Project Engineer for the Sunset West Community Facilities Districts, which will finance the construction of the core water, sewer, storm drain and roadway improvements necessary for the 900 acre development($9.5 million estimated construction cost). Part of Mr. Ries' responsibility was the analysis and design of the 50 acre-feet storm water detention facility, including establishment of the 100-year flood plain, through the use of the Army Corps of Engineers HEC-1 and HEC-RAS software. Mr. Ries has also recently served as Project Engineer for the Route 80/Rocklin Road Under Crossing project($2.4 million estimated construction cost). This project includes widening Rocklin Road under the existing freeway under crossing, relocation of the local frontage road, realignment of the eastbound off-ramp, reconstruction of the Route 80 westbound on-ramp and traffic signal modifications. Mr. Ries has also be n involved with the design of the Route 5/Bird Road Interchange and local access road project in San J aquin County ($9.6 million estimated construction cost), the Route 65 Blue Oaks Interchange project 'i City of Atascadero ($7.8 million estimated construction cost), as well as establishing the pre ' ary geometrics for the interchange modifications required for the Route 99/Monte Vista Avenue and Route 99/Fulkerth Road Circulation Study in Stanislaus County. Before joining the OMNI-MEANS design team, Mr. Ries served as a Project Manager/Project Engineer for the city'of Vacaville Public Works Department. During his five years at the City of Vacaville, Mr. Ries was exposed to a large variety of civil engineering projects including road widening, road resurfacing and interchange modification projects. He also gained valuable insight into the operation of a local agency and had the opportunity to become familiar with the interrelationship between a local agency and Caltrans. Project Study Report Page 39 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 liderchange (PI662SCP.001) 000117 DAVID W. FOOTE, ASLA FIRMA-PRINCIPAL PROJECT RESPONSIBILITY: EDUCATION: Bachelor of Science with Honors Landscape Architecture- 1997 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: California Landscape Architect No. 2117 MEMBERSHIP: American Society of Landscape Architects Association of Environmental Professionals AWARDS: Certificate of Honor: American Society of Landscape Architects CCASLA Merit Award: Uniform Landscape Guidelines for the City of Santa Maria APA Merit Award: Villa Ross- Planning Project Award ACTIVITIES: Central Coast Section SCC-ASLA: Chairperson 1988, 1995 Design Review Board: San Luis Country Club Estates Beautification Committee: Downtown BIA San Luis Obispo Lease and Site Committee: San Luis Obispo Botanical Garden COMMUNITY SERVICE: Board of Directors-1988-Present Lifeline - Crises Pregnancy Center, Arroyo Grande Board of Directors - 1985-1988 Tree of Life- Crisis Pregnancy Center of the Central Coast Atascadero and Arroyo Grande Board of Directors - 1986-1988 Life_Education Council- Central Coast Chapter Christian Action Council San Luis Obispo, California Director- 1978-1983 The Open Door - Coffeehouse /Rescue Mission Pismo Beach, California EXPERIENCE: Principal 1995-Present Principal 1982- 1995 Associate/Designer 1976-1982 Firma San Luis Obispo, CA Sedes, San Luis Obispo, CA Sedes, San Luis Obispo, CA Lecturer 1981, 1985-8, 1989, 1991, 1995 Department of Landscape Architecture College of Architecture and Environmental Design California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, California 000118 ROBERT O.WATIaNS,P.E. MHM ENGINEERS 4 k SURVEYORS PROJECT RESPONsi ITY: Quality Control-Caltrans Policy; Caltrans Liaison Provide project oversight. Review work products for conformance with Caltrans policies and standards. Interact, as necessary, as liaison with Client Agency, Caltrans and the consulting team.. Assisted in developing schedules and funding for transportation engineering efforts, as a consultant to local, state and federalagencies to help smooth the processes and find funding opportunities. EDUCATION: BS in Engineering, California State University, Sacramento PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: Professional Engineer Civil), State of California GOVERNMENT RELATIONS: Past President, Sacramento Chapter,American Public Works Assoc. Member, American Society of Civil Engineers REFERENCES James van Loben Sels Director of 916 Transportation 654-5267 P ( ) Kathy Lund, Member PCTPA Board (916) 632-4050 EXPERIENCE: District Director three times: Bishop, San Bernardino and Marysville. The Marysville assignment (1988-91) included re onsibility for managing and directing a staff of 1300 and a$300,000,000 program. The program included planning, design, environmental clearance, right of way efforts, construction and main enance of all transportation projects in an eleven county area including Sacramento and Lake ahoe. Chief Deputy Director: Responsible for planning, budgeting and directing the department, with a staff of 20,000 and a budget of$6 billion a year. Bob became directly involved in several projects,such as the replacement of the Cypress freeway, which was destroyed in the Loma Prieta earthquake. Deputy Director: Project development, Chief of the transportation laboratory and Chief of Caltrans' local assistance program. Assisted Xerox Corporation in developing a paperless construction management program for very large projects complete with.both fiscal (payments) and engineering (change orders) controls. In 1997-98 served as interim executive director for the City of Atascadero Transportation Planning Agency for five months assisting in the hiring of a new Director. During this period the Board �) programmed several rad and rail projects. Project Study Report Page 41 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Inte change (P1662SCP.001) 000119 - Tarvin & Associates -Real Estate Appraisal and Acquisition Services ** PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS ** R. H. Tarvin, SRWA, IFAS Right of Way Project Manager and Real Estate Appraiser INTRODUCTION R.H. (Bob)Tarvin SR/WA-Is the owner of Tarvin&Associates, a right of way consulting firm. Prior to forming his own company,Bob was employed by the,California Department of Transportation for over 25 years. Bob credits Caltrans with providing him with the opportunity to gain invaluable experience in the right of way field. While at Caltrans he served as the Local Programs Manager in District 5 (San Luis Obispo) providing right of way oversight and assistance in connection with highway projects located throughout the state. His past business activities also include providing right of way consultation to the California Department of Water Resources in connection with a 120-mile state water pipeline project located on the central coast of California and various other local public agency projects. Most recently,he has been involved in the Project Development phase for several transportation related projects located throughout the State. Having prepared or reviewed in excess of 1,000 appraisals while employed with Caltrans, he is very familiar with the Caltrans Right of Way Procedural Manual and the guidelines pertaining to the appraisal and acquisition of real property required for a State Highway project. He is also astutely familiar with the Caltrans Project Development Manual as it relates to right of way matters. Mr. Tarvin is an experienced real estate appraiser with a strong background in the valuation of lands required for Caltrans highway projects. In addition to being a State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser,he also possesses two appraisal designations from two highly respected and recognized professional appraisal organizations. Bob also served as the President of the International Right of Way Association during 1991-92. He currently represents the International Right of Way Association as their appointed trustee to the Appraisal Foundation. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE January 1994 to Present-Tarvin and Associates Real Estate Appraisal and Acquisition Services and Project Development. October 1969 to January 1994-Department of Transportation Right of Way Staff Appraiser,Acquisition Agent and Local Agency Program Manager. Appraisal and acquisition experience includes residential, agricultural, commercial and special purpose properties. 229 Miller Way,Arroyo Grande,CA 93420,(805)489-0147,(805)489-9480 FAX E Mail-rhtarvin@msn.com 000120 Tarvin & Associates - Real Estate Appraisal and Acquisition Services Experience includes appraising and negotiating for rights of way in Monterey, San Benito County, anta Barbara County and San Luis Obispo County, Ventura County,Kern C' unty i.e. (State Highways 183, 1,129, 101, Santa Barbara Cross Town Freewayetc.). These activities included highway rights of way, sound walls,material acquisition and disposal sites,utility easements,pipeline rights of way and involy d both lessee and lessor interest. PROJECTS UNDERTAIKEN BY TARVIN&ASSOCIATES PARTIAL LIST • Rte. 101/1\4ilpas Street Roundabout, Santa Barbara Co. Project Study Report and complete Right of Way project Management/Appraisal/Acquisition. • Rte. 10 e. 46 Interchange, City of Atascadero, Project Study Report • Rte. 101/Union Valley Parkway- Santa Maria,Project Study Report • Rte. 13 /Hummel Dr. - Santa Maria,Project Study Report • Rte. 101/Los Cameros Rd. Interch., Santa Barbara Co.,Project Study Report • Rte 1351Betteravia Rd. Santa Maria, Project Study Report • Rte. 101/154 Interchange Project, Santa Barbara Co.,Project Study Report • Rte. 101/156 Realignment Project,Monterey County, Project Study Report • South S sanville/Richmond Rd By-Pass, Lassen County-Project Study Report • Skyline Road Extension, Lassen County,Project Study Report • ArcadeWater District Well Site Acquisition-Sacramento County,Appraisal • San Benito Street Extension San Benito County (SBCOG),Right of Way Project Management,Appraisal and Acquisition • Hall Ro id Realignment-Monterey County, Rights of Way Acquisition • Westsid Blvd./Union Road Alignment- San Benito County, Right of Way Project anagement,Appraisal and Acquisition • Grover each MultiModal Transit Facility,Amtrak Station-Appraisal • Highway 001 Widening Project-CALTRANS, San Luis Obispo County Appraisal • Elk LanBridge Replacement, City of San Luis Obispo Project Appraiser • California Coastal Aqueduct Project, San Luis Obispo County,Appraisal and Acquisi .on 101/Mam Street Interchange Project- Santa Maria, SBCAG, Right of Way Manage ent/Appraisal/Acquisition • Highway 135 Storm Drain Project- City of Santa Maria, Management,Appraisal, Acquisition 229 Mi ler Way,Arroyo Grande,CA 93420,(805)489-0147,(805)489.-9480 FAX - E Mail-rhtarvin@msn.com 000121 Section S PROJECT SCHEDULE SCHEDULE Given Caltrans normal processing time, our project schedule maintains an efficient pace, which can reasonably yield an approved PSR by the end of July 1999. The following chart illustrates our preliminary project time frame from beginning work through submission of the Final PSR. l Project Study Report Page 43 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Interchange (P1662SCP.001) 000122 Traffic Way/Route 101 Interchange PSR Tentative Project Schedule-Revised 03/19/99 (P1662SCH.001) April I May June ID Task Name Duration 4/11 4/18 4/25 5/2 5/9 5/16 5/23 5/30 6/6 6/13 6/20 6/27 1 Project Management 79 days 2 Kick-off Meeting/PD 1 0 days 4/26 3 Data Collection 10 days 4 Base Mapping ' 22 days 5 Traffic Operations Aralysis 5 days 6 Working Paper#1 1 day 7 Optional Workshop 41 0 days ♦ 5111 8 Traffic Model Develop 20 days 9 Environmental/Haz Waste 20 days 10 Working Paper#2 20 days 11 Newsletter#1(OPTI N) 10 days 12 "Sketch-Plan"Conce' is 5 days 13 Optional PDT Meetin 3 0 days 14 Optional Workshop 42 0 days 5/25 15 Schematic Alternatives 10 days 16 Newsletter#2(OPTION) 10 days , 17 Working Paper#3 4 days 18 PDT#2 Meeting 0 days 5/25 19 Concept Selection 0 days 20 RefineSchematics 1 day 21 Design Geometrics 7 days 22 Structures APS 13 days 23 Prepare Fact Sheets 15 days 24 Prepare ROW/Cost Data 15 days 25 Prepare Draft PSR 15 days 26 PDT#3 Meeting 0 days 6/ 27 Presentation to Council 0 days ♦ 6i Task Rolled Up Progress Progress External Tasks BEENE= Project:Commercial I/C PSR Milestone ♦ Project Summary Date:1/6/99 Summary Split Rolled Up Task :;:::;:::::° ::: ::'•:::'-:::' Roiled Up Split Rolled Up Milestone O Page 1 000123 Section 6 Insurance OMNI-MEANS carries the following insurance: Errors and Omissions - $1,000,000 General Liability - $2,000,000 Automobile Liability - $1,000,000 @ $4,000,000 rider Our coverage is through CNA — Continental Casualty, and; CAN —Transport Insurance Co. All are rated "A„ Project Study Report Page 45 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Interchange (P1662SCP.001) 000124 Section 7 Af rmative Action Policy I. Purpose To pi'eserve an employment environment free from all aspects of illegal discrimination. 11. Scope This olicy applies to all employees at all locations of the company. III. Policy The company will maintain a policy of nondiscrimination with all employees and applicants for employment. All aspects of employment within the company will be governed on the basis of merit, competence and qualifications and will not be influenced in any manner by race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, handicap, medical condition, marital or veteran status. All decisions made with respect to recruiting,hiring and promotions for all job classications will be made solely on the basis of individual qualifications related to the requ' ements of the position. Likewise, the administration of all other personnel matters such as compensation, benefits, transfers, reduction-in-force, recall, training, education and s:)cial/recreational programs will be free from any illegal discriminatory practices. WE HAVE ENGAGED THE SERVICES OF ONE DISADVANTAGED FIRM ON THIS PROJECT: Twining Laboratories (DVBE): Hazardous Waste 1 Project Study Report Page 46 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Int'rchange (P1662SCP.001) 000125 Section 8 Project Management Process Omni-Means Project Management OMNI-MEANS has developed a sophisticated project management system to ensure the successful completion of projects on-schedule within budget, and with appropriate quality control. Project Management, Scheduling and Budget Control First, project schedules are developed to identify critical path tasks and resource requirements. Next, on a weekly basis resources are allocated and progress evaluated on a task basis. Finally, peer review of project deliverables is performed at project milestones. In addition, OMNI-MEANS has developed a complete internal quality control manual that sets standards and design procedure requirements for every aspect of design project. This document is know as our Procedures Manual. In short, the Procedures Manual provides the following: • Documentation of Standards • Training on Company Standards • Company Wide product Consistency • Development and Completion of Successful Projects • Maximization of Design Software Capabilities • File Protection and Back-up • Archiving and Retrieval of Project Related Electronic Data • Compatibility of Electronic and Paper Systems The following text and associated graphics are an excerpt from our Project Management Manual, and documents the process we use in controlling and coordinating our work effort throughout the project process. This manual was developed internally and we use the approach and routines on all projects independent of size. We would be happy to share the information contained in this document, as well as our "Cookbook" during the interview process. The management of each project is tracked through a series of meetings and feedback from our central services department. Project Study Report Page 47 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Interchange (P1662SCP.001) 000126 - OMNI-MEANS PROJECT MANAGEMENT - ' (Excerpt from Project Management Manual) OMNI-MEANS has d veloped and utilizes a comprehensive approach to project management, from the initial client contact d rough the completion of the project and archiving the files. Every project contracted by OMNI-MEANS is assigned a Project Manager and is monitored throughout its life by one of the three princ pals in the firm. This approach gives our clients a single point contact for their project through the P Ject Manger, and also provides them with principal level access. Our Project Management Process is documented in a two volume set and is supported by in-house training and seminarsFigures 2.4 and 2.7 are taken from our manuals and demonstrate the flow of a project through our stem. Figure 2.4 shows the overall project management from initial client contact through archiving the files. A key step is the project initiation. It is at this point that a team of OMNI-MEANS professionals is formed to meet the specific expertise required of the individual project. The Project Schedule and Quality Plan are established as well, as intensive sessions devoted to identifying unique pr 'blems that may arise on the project. As a final step in this project initiation, the Project Work Plan is reviewed and set up in the firm's accounting system. Figure 2.7 expands oil this overall project management, and illustrates the weekly scheduling cycle for all projects. After th project schedule has been established, it is reviewed and adjustments made, if necessary, on a weekly basis. All projects are broken into Tasks with specific OMNI-MEANS personnel assigned to complete each, and quality review milestones are assigned. Progress is reviewed on a weekly basis by both the Project Manager and the Principal-in-Charge. Internally, a weekly scheduling meeting is conducted to eliminate scheduling conflicts and coordinate intra-disciplinary, tasks. Overall, this system has proven to provide projects that run smoother with fewer unanticipated problems. Work pro iucts are produced on-time and within budget. The final product has undergone periodic and scheduled quality reviews to provide our clients with a consistently high quality product in a timely and well planned environment. Project Study Report Page 48 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Im erchange (P1662SCP.001) 000127 Section 9 Cost/Quality Control/Utility Coordination The preceding discussions described both the project management system and the quality control manual, which OMNI-MEANS uses to ensure the successful completion of projects descriptions illustrate three (3) projects that typify our commitment to this effort.both on-schedule and in budget. The following table and accompanying project COMPARABLE PROJECTS COST/SCHEDULE CONTROL ACTUAL DESIGN ACTUAL PROJECT COMPLETION PROJECT/CLIENT COST DATE Stockton Boulevard/State Route 99 884,565 Aug 1993 Price Co./Sacramento Co. S.E.Rocklin-Circulation Improvements $1,677,400(Bid) *Sept 1995 to City of Rocklin(China Garden Road) u. Sept 1996 Widening State Route 65 $195,226(Bid) u Aug 1995 City of Wheatland t. $197,000(Final) *Construction Schedule STATE ROUTE 99/STOCKTON BOULEVARD OMNI-MEANS, in cooperation with Sacramento County Highways and Bridges staff prepared and processed a Project Study Report, Project Report and PS&E for modifications to the State Route 99 and Stockton Boulevard interchange. The approved alterations include ramp and roadway realignments and construction of a new signalized intersection. Preliminary work included traffic demand analysis, as well as preparation of the conceptual geometrics to facilitate the necessary modifications. Although by description, this modification project might be considered ordinary, the need to complete construction from start of PSR within 18 months was not. Due to the planned opening of a Price Club to meet their busy season, cooperation on behalf of Caltrans,Sacramento County, and Price Club to expedite the review and approval process was critical. Under the project management, design talent and commitment to schedule of OMNI-MEANS, the modification was completed on time. This project, by all involved including Caltrans.and Sacramento County, is being touted as a testament of public/private partnership and cooperation, and a "can do" attitude. Ref: Jim Marchand Sacramento County Public Works (916)440-6291 Project Study Report Page 49 March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Interchange (PI 662SCP.001) 000128 S.E.ROCELIN-ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Funded through a$4+ million dollar Mello Roos District the improvements to the roadway network in Southeast Rocklin_involves reconstruction of both city streets and the Rocklin Road/Interstate 80 interchange. The Interstate 80 interchange work includes a PSR, Project Report and PS&E for the reloc 'tion of the EB off-ramp, the reconstruction of the Rocklin Road channelization beneath the Interstate 80 bridge and the reconstruction of the WB Interstate 80 on- ramp The local street improvement includes traffic signalization along Rocklin Road, a new bridge crossing of Secret Ravine Creek and the realignment of China Garden Road PS&E for all these improvements are included in the project. Ref: Carlos Urrutia City Manager City of Rocklin (916)'',632-4050 STATE ROUTE 65/MAIN STREET ROAD WIDENING'-WHEATLAND, CALIFORNIA OMNI-MEANS prepared a warrant study for traffic signalization of State Route 65 and Main Street in Wheatland, California. The addition of left-tum storage lanes resulted in the need to widen approximately five (5) city blocks along State Route 65. A project report was prepared and processed along with final PS&E for the entire project. Ref: ClayCastleberry iT3' Acting City Manager (916) 346-6234 Re atory/Utility Coordination OMNI-MEANS has extensive experience in working with public and private utility companies and Regulatory Agencies, in behalf of our clients. A recent example would be the new interchange on Interstate 5 in San Joaquin County near the interchange at Bird Road involved: Vernalis: PG&E Gas Distribution Division- Coordination involved the location and field potholing of the exiting 54" and 36" intracontenental high pressure natural gas transmission pipelines for the Interstate 51 Bird Road Interchange. The project crossed these pipelines in three locations,including the new northbound ramp. Based on the scheduling requirements for a pipeline shutdown- for relocation, the interchange design was revised at a savings of approximately$1,000,000. ` San Luis and Delta Mendota Water Authority - Coordination required to replace an existing bridge over the Delta Mendota Canal at Gaffery Road. Project Study Report Page 50 March 18, 1999 Trak WayMoute 101 Interchange (PI 662SCP.001) 000129 California Department of Water Resources - Coordination required to rehabilitate the bridge railings, approach guardrails and service roadway intersections at the existing bridge over the California Aqueduct at Gaffery Road. Coordination with Chevron and UnoCal Pipeline divisions to perform field locations and potholing at several locations associated with the Interstate 51 Bird Road Interchange project. Another example, in the Tahoe Basin,was the Incline Village Bikeway System Implementation. A total of 27 regulatory and review agencies were involved in this project, completed for Washoe County. The review agencies included: • Soils Conservation Service • Tahoe Regional Planning Agency • Lahonton Regional Water Quality Control Board • California Tahoe Conservancy • US Forest Service • Nevada Department of Transportation • Soil Conservation Service • Nevada and California Department of Fish and Game Project Study Report Page SI March 18, 1999 Traffic Way/Route 101 Interchange (PI662SCP.001) 000130 i ATTACHMENT D Evaluation Committee Comments 000131 . . �...': P-:'03 Apr 1299 12 42P P 1P Y`�h'•s z �Ay ^� �, 9 nrr ,yF } M f t$ 1✓3# ' `teti aY y,4�F k':a-�3. ^. +�r�4. s�,ky *i§`. t. hr * s`i;�. f�r - �'.'.. #x y�,�d t',:-���"l s S r n a �'"''J� r •.� �. s°FR$C' � fi'si"$. �. 4 Fa' 4 :l '`c �" tt -r1 " ,.;t vT x DF:A.TASCAp R(3hrrsl} } r NITYiSERVICES 6500 PALMA AVE NM ATASCADERO,CA 93422 4b1•SdTO•i (805)461.7815 r ROUTE 107ITltAFiC WAY PROJECT STUDY REPORT .k PROPOSAL EVALUATION SHEET CRITERIA MhXIMUM ', RATING PotNTS Understanding of the work to be done Experience with similar kinds of work 25 2 20 Staff Qualifications Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 25 Financial responsibility 5 � Total 100 90 Comments: Committee Member: C. C.. , Xs199115AFMOPOSALRTF APR-12-1%9 11=42, 000132 anL' bis o . our�ci of overirr�ents Y Rol- I 1 rart�purtution Pltinning Agcney Ci�wY nrK h rcipCo'litn Pl.. QMminingrgweiizattrn 'Afliatensuti Data ;t•.n�u I«t..+�Hbqe ,. •pumtlJ i..!h('mh 'L•us"Uw-t7.e.nh " S" t " (NIM Service Authority for Prcewa s and Expressways _ Sua[+4AbugxiCuumy Date:, ^April , 1999 To; John f9il From, Scott IEades Re: Ornnkneans Rte 101JTraffic Way Interchange Modifications Proposal Attached is our completed evaluation sheet for this proposal..Our comments on the proposal are as follows: The firm's ui iderstanding of the.transportation problem and future project needs as expresse,J in the proposal appears limited. However,we are pleased with the recommend d approach and are comfortable with the firms limited knowledge - considering ,he approach that is to be employed. We are concerned that only two alternatives are to be forwarded into the final PSR. We recommend that the City negotiate for a third alternative and/or set a predetermined cost for each additional alternative to be analyzed In the final PSR (so that alternative analysis could be"purchased"later as needed). • We are plea ed to see that the "sketch plans"will be reviewed with the City, Caltrans, an I SLOCOG (as noted on page 11)_ We recommend that the consultant a so work closely with these parties when Identifying the five"sketch" alternatives. Thank you.for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. We apologize for any inconvenience our delay in responding may have caused. If you have any questions, please call me at 781-5764. I 150 ON-S111:0- tc.202.San Luis Obispo.CA 93401 � '1i 1.(MM)781-1219♦Fax.(90.5)181-5703 1:-n ail. slo ugOslonct.org 4 Internet. http:/lwww.alonet.ort!•-illsft oK APR-12-1999 11:42 P.02 000333 P CITY OF ATASCADERO • ■• • ■ COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 5-1i a 6500 PALMA AVENUE,ATASCADERO,CA 93422 Telephone:(805)461-5020 ' Fax:(805)461-7615 VA e ANS ROUTE 101/TRAFFIC WAY PROJECT STUDY REPORT PROPOSAL EVALUATION SHEET CRITERIA MAXIMUM RATING POINTS Understanding of the work to be done 25 Z Z Experience with similar kinds of work 25 ?1 3 Staff Qualifications 20 g Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 25 Za I Financial responsibility 5 S Total 100 8 8 Comments: L o G cL.x 2 e 0 Committee Member• ' KAUSERS\RDK\99115\RFP\PROP®-OOIE3 4 CITY OF ATASCADERO n■ ■■ ■ ■ COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 9 6500 PALMA AVENUE,ATASCADERO,CA 93422 Telephone:(805)461-5020 + Fax:(805)461-7615 ROUTE 101/TRAFFIC WAY PROJECT STUDY REPORT PROPOSAL EVALUATION SHEET CRITERIA MAXIMUM RATING POINTS Understanding of the wok to be done 25 Experience with similar kinds of work 25 � Staff Qualifications 20 a Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 25 A .^ Financial responsibility 5 Total 100 q0 Comments: T w P50 Committee Member: X:U9115\RFP\PR0P05AL.RTE 000135 t � t .m ••} : a u '6.- A iii F{�' a _ �.V. c,g p, .-r¢ &�`• xr,-'eF4 a ¢ .� � aY.y L""SS,C'd': t i3' h' e'r ,'."n21 �.s�� -a "i's -�r'.� t �'�.:� '�.�ia z,-ray �a •c e C S DEPAR NT says ;v 65o0 PAL14tA AVENCFE,ArASCADERO;CA 93432 '_" € � " zz j - } S ROUTE 101fTRAFFIC WAY PROJECT STUDY PROPOSAL EVALUATION SHE T `� Wi > CRITERIA MAXIMUM RATING x "POINTS Y } Understanding of the work to be'done 2.5 Experience with similar kinds of work 25 d Z, Staff Qualifications 20 Familiars with State and Federal procedures tY P 25 �. Financial responsibility 5 Total 104 It , u Comments: r "r fid +ice its vLs Committee Member: _ XA991151R "ROPOSALRTE 4 f�R-09-1999 132? 8055493603 = p . 02 00,01 ITEM NUMBER: C - 1 DATE: 04/27/99 J! pip pp 1918 i p 19� City Man ger's Agenda Report Wade G. McKinney Pa toma Creek Park Food Concessions Agreement RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Karen Estrada of Atascader , to operate a concessions stand at Paloma Creek Park DISCUSSION: The Community Services Department has operated the snack bar at Paloma Creek Park with private contractors. e City receives a percentage of the concessionaires gross sales. Prior to this contract arrangement, City staff handled this operation at minimal or no profit. Previous concessionaires were Adele's Catering, for approximately three years, Webb Catering for approximately three months, and most recently, Paloma Creek Mini-mart also for approximately three months. Both f the recent concessionaires were losing money and backed out of the agreement early. Community ServicesDepartment staff have solicited proposals for the Paloma Concession operation and received three proposals by the deadline. Proposals were submitted by: 1. Willi (Bill)Rabenaldt Pismo Beach 2. Karen Estrada - Atascadero 3. Doug Trout& Leslie Squire Atascadero Staff is recommending the selection of Karen Estrada based on the results of a graded evaluation to determine the mos suitable proposer,the fact that she is proposed the highest percentage to the City, and on staf evaluations of their potential for success. Karen Estrada has the necessary concessions experience and submitted the highest percentage of gross sales to the City. Karen's proposed menu is appropriate for the facility, and affordably priced for the routine patrons. In addition, Karen EstrE da intends to operate the Paloma Creek Park Snack Stand as an owner/ • operator, instead of 1.'ring staff to run the operation. In the opinion of staff,historically, the amount of revenue generated from the Paloma Creek Park snack stand, makes it difficult to operate this facility v ith paid staff. 00013'7 ITEM NUMBER: C - 1 DATE: 04/27/99 William(Bill)Rabenaldt's proposal was interesting and worthy of serious consideration. Bill Rabenaldt proposed to expand the scope of the food concessions operation to include equipment rentals, such as bicycles, horse shoes,volleyballs, etc. Bill Rabenaldt is currently the concessionaire at Atascadero Lake Park for both the Pavilion Concession Stand and the Paddleboat rental operation. Staff is recommending against this proposal for the following reasons; 1.- The scope of the Request for Proposals for the Paloma Creek Park Snack Stand did not include equipment rentals, and to be fair to other proposers,we should open the process again and advertise the inclusion of equipment rentals. 2.- Paloma Creek Park is does not have appropriate surfaces for bicycle riding and there may be temptation for the bicycle renters to enter the parking lot or ride out onto Viejo Camino,both of which are extremely unsafe for cycling. 3.- Staffing would be provided by paid employees, limiting the profitability from this site for the Concessionaire. 4.- Paloma Creek Park has limited storage facilities for rental equipment. Any storage structures would have to be installed by the contractor at his/or her expense,possibly requiring several years of operation to recover the infrastructure improvements: 5.- Current facility use patterns and attendance do not necessarily seem to be significant enough based on staff estimates to support the recovery of infrastructure costs. 6.- The menu selection submitted is appropriate,but significantly higher priced than the prices recommended by Karen Estrada. Staff feels that it may be difficult for Bill Rabenaldt to operate a profitable business given the current circumstances at Paloma Creek Park. Future improvements to Paloma may create a neighborhood park atmosphere that might support an expanded concessions operation, however not at this time. A third proposal submitted by Doug Trout and Leslie Squire was considered to be,inadequate by staff. On Thursday, April 15, 1999,the Parks and Recreation Commission voted to recommend approve of the Paloma Creek Park Food Concessions Agreement with Karen Estrada. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this agreement will generate approximately$1,500 to $2,000.00 revenue: ALTERNATIVES: Award the concessions agreement to another proposer. 000138 ITEM NUMBER: C - 1 DATE: 04/27/99 E DEPARTMENT: Community Services RESPONSIBLE y Department ATTACHMENTS: Paloma Creek Park Food Concessions Agreement Concessionaire Proposals 000139 CONTRACT FOR SERVICES PALOMA CREEK PARK FOOD AND DRINK CONCESSION ' ' OPERATION This agreement is made upon the date of execution, as set forth below, by and between Karen. Estrada , hereinafter referred to as "Contractor", and the City of Atascadero,, California, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City." : The parties hereto, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, hereby agree to the following terms and conditions: 1.00 GENERAL. PROVISIONS 1.01 - TERM: This . agreement will become effective on the date of execution set forth below, and will continue in effect until terminated as provided herein. 1.02 LOCATION: Premises of Operations is the concession facility located at Paloma Creek- Park, 11665 Viejo Camino, Atascadero, California 1.03 SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR: -Contractor agrees to perform or provideservices, as specified within this contract and in "Description of Services" attached hereto as "Exhibit A" . Contractor shall determine the method, details and means of performing the above-referenced services. Contractor may, at Contractor' s own expense, employ such assistants as Contractor deems necessary to perform services required of Contractor by this agreement. City may not control, direct or supervise Contractor's assistants or employees in the performance of those services. 1.04. SUBLEASE: Contractor shall not sublease or otherwise convey any interest of any sort granted by this agreement to any person or persons whatsoever without prior written consent and approval by the City. 1 .05 COMPENSATION: In consideration for with the terms of this contract, Contractor agrees to pay the sum of 12.5$ of the total gross earnings monthly of all monies received by the Contractor from the use of the premises depicted in this contract. Gross earnings shall not include any sales Revised 3/98 -1- 000140 or excise taxes imposed by any governmental entity. Payment tothe City of Atascadero of the percentage gross earnings received shall be made by the tenth (10th) day of each month. Payments are, required_ to be submitted to the City of AtascadOrof Department of Community -Services, Room 107, Ata 'cadero, Ca. 93422 (Attn: Paula Anton `) Failure by the Contractor to tender payment to the City, within thirty (30) daysof any payment so due, shall be sufficient cause for the City to terminate this agreement. 1.06 REC RDS AND ACCOUNTS: Contractor shall keep true and accurate books and records showing all its business transactions in separate records of account for the concession operation, in a manner acceptable to the City. The City shall have the right through its representatives, and at all reasonable times, to inspect such books and records, including State of California sales tax records. The City may require Contractor, at his expense, to have his records end accounts audited by an auditor acceptable to the City and shall present said audit to the Director of Administrative Services within thirty (30) days after the completion of the audit. If Contractors fails to provide the required audit, the City shall contract to have an audit ' performed at the Contractor' s expense. 1 .07 CONDITIONS OF PREMISES: The taking .of possession of the subject premises by Contractor shall, in itself, constitute acknowledgement that the premises are in good and tenantable condition. Contractor agrees to accept said premises in the present existing condition, "as is" and the City sha ''1 not be obligated to make any alterations, addition ', or betterments thereto. Contractor may .construct or modify the said premises with prior written approval by the Director .(or designee) of the Department of Community Services. Any plans for such construc ion, if applicable shall be submitted to the City for approval. . Such construction or modification-shall .be without cost to the City. 1.08 SI GE: All signs, names or placards shall be approved by the Department'of Community Services prior to installa ion. All signs will meet, all requirements and specifications as set forth by City. Revised 3/98 _2 400141: 2.0.0 OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTOR 2.01 MINIMUM AMOUNT OF SERVICE BY CONTRACTOR: Contractor agrees to devote the hours necessary to perform the services set forth in this agreement in an ' efficient" and effective manner. -Contractor may .represent, perform .services for and be employed by additional individuals or entities, in Con- tractor's sole discretion, as long as the performance of these extra-contractual services does not interfere with or presents a conflict with City's business. 2.02 HOURS OF OPERATION: Contractor is authorized to operate the concession on a daily basis. Hours of operation to be established by Contractor upon mutual agreement -with the Director, (or designee) of the Department of Community Services, but as a minimum during all adult softball spring, summer and fall Leagues. The City will not restrict individuals, organizations, or clubs, with a confirmed usage permit for Paloma Creek Park sports fields, from providing similar concessions during their special event, provided that the concessions are specifically for participants of the said special event, and provided that the concession has been authorized by the Department of Community Services, and a County of San Luis Obispo .Health Department; permit has been obtained. At any time should an occurrence necessitate the closure of Paloma Creek Park to the general public, the Contractor shall have no recourse .by law to the City for losses incurred. 2 .03 PERMITS: Contractor is required to provide City, prior to commencement of operation of concession, a copy of a City Business License, a San Luis Obispo County Health Department permit, and a Board of Equalization Certificate. 2.04 TAXES: Contractor agrees to pay all lawful taxes, assessments or charges which may be levied by government entities. 2.05 EQUIPMENT: Contractor,` at his .own expense, shall completely equip the concession, and keep all equipmene in a first class manner to the satisfaction of the Department of Community Services throughout the term of this contract. 2.06 QUALITY OF SERVICE / CONTROLLED RATES AND CHARGES: The City has the right to inspect and schedule the prices and rates of goods sold upon the subject premises. The City reserves the right to prohibit the sale of any item which it deems Revised 3/98 -3- 000142 objectionable or beyond the scope of merchandise deemed necessary for ,proper service to the public. . Contractor shall post rates and prices of all items in such places as designated- by the City. 2.07 SECURITY, COMMUNICATIONS: - The 'Contractor agrees to Provide telephone and security alarm services to concession . throughout the duration of this contract at Contractors expense. 2.08 TCOLS AND INSTRUMENTALITIES: Contractor shall provide all to(71s and instrumentalities to perform the services under ; this agreement. 2.09 WO R'S COMPENSATION AND OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS City ant Contractor intend and agree that Contractor is an independ nt contractor of City and agrees that Contractor has no right to worker's compensation and other employee benefits. If any worker insurance protection is desired, Contractor agrees to provide worker's compensation and other . employee benefits where required by law, for Contractor' s employees and agents. 2. 10 IDENTIFICATION: Contractor hereby agrees to, and shall, hold City, its elective and appointive boards, officers, agents and employees, harmless and. shall defend the same. from any liability for damage or claims for damage, or suits . or actions at law or in equity which may allegedly arise from Contractor' s or any of Contractor's employees' or agents' operations under this agreement, whether such operations be by Contractor or by any one or 'more persons directly or indirectly employed by, or acting as agent for, Contractor; provided as follows: a. That the City does not, and shall not, waive any rights against Contractor which it may have by reason of the aforesaid hold-harmless agreement, because of the accep- ta 'ce by City, or the deposit with City by Contractor, of any of the insurance policies hereinafter described. b. That the aforesaid hold-harmless agreement by Contractor shell apply to all damages and claims for damages of every kind suffered, or alleged to. have been suffered, by reason of any of the aforesaid operations of Contrac- tox or any agent or employee of Contractor regardless of whether or not such insurance policies snail have been determined to' be applicable to any of such damages or claims for damages. Revised 3/98 -4- .000143 202.11 INSURANCE: Contractor shall not commence work under this contract until s/he shall have. obtained -all insurance required under this section and such insurance shall have been approved by City as to form, amount and carrier: a. Public Liability- and Property . Damage Insurance:. Contractor shall takeout and maintain during the life of this contract such public. liability and property damage insurance as -shall protect City, its elective and appointive boards, officers, agents and employees. and Contractor and any agents and employees performing work covered under this contract- from claims for *damages for personal injury, including death, as well as from claims for property damage which may arise from Contractor's operation or . anyone directly or indirectly employed by Contractor. The amounts of such insurance shall be as follow: 1. Public Liability Insurance: In an amount not less than $500,000 per injury, including death to any one person and, subject to the same limit for each person, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 on account of any one occurrence; 2. Property Damage Insurance: In an amount of not less -than $50,000 for ,damage to the property of each. person on account of anyone occurrence. 3. Comprehensive Automobile Liability: Bodily injury liability coverage of $500,000 for each person in any one accident and $1,000,000 for injuries sustained by two or more persons in any one accident. Property damage liability of $50,000 for each accident. b. PROOF OF INSURANCE: Contractor shall furnish. City, concurrently with the execution hereof, with copies of all required insurance policies, and adequate legal assurance that each carrier -will give the -City at least thirty (30) days prior-notice of cancellation ofany policy during the period of this contract. All insurance policies shall name the City as additional insured with the Contractor. 3.00 OBLIGATIONS OF CITY 3.01 COOPERATION: City agrees to comply with all reasonable requests of Contractor necessary to the performance of Revised 3/98 -5- 000144 Contractor's duties under this agreement. 3.02 PLACE OF WORK: City agrees to furnish, concession facility at Paloma Creek Park .for use by the Contractor while . performing the services described in this agreement 3.03 UTILITIES: - City agrees to pay for electric'. gas, disposal and water utility fees associated with the concession operation. 4 .00 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 4.01 TEc2MINATION ON NOTICE: Notwithstanding any other pro- vision of this agreement, any party hereto may terminate this agreement, at any time, without cause by giving at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to the other parties to this agreement. 4.02 IIERMINATION ON OCCURRENCE OF STATED EVENTS: This agreement shall terminate automatically on the occurrence of any of the following events: (1) Bankruptcy or insolvency of any party; (2) Sale of the business of any party; .(3) Death of any party (4) The end of the thirty (30) days. as .,set 'forth in Section 4.01; (5) End of the contract to which Contractor's services were necessary; or (6) Assignment of this . agreement by Contractor without the consent of the City. 4.03 TERMINATION BY ANY PARTY FOR DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR: Should a' y party default in the performance of this agree-ment or materially breach of any of its provisions, a non- breaching party, at their option, may terminate this agree ment, immediately, by giving. written notice of termination to the beaching party. 4.04 TERMINATION:,. This Agreement shall terminate on 4/31/2000, unless extended as set forth in this Section. The City, with the agreement of the Contractor; is authorized to extend the term of this Agreement beyond the termination date, as needed, under the same terms and conditions set forth in this' Ageement. Any such extension shall be in writing and be an amendment to this Agreement. 5.00 MISCELLAREOUS Revised 3/98 -6- 000145 5.01 REMEDIES: The remedies set forth in, this agreement shall not be exclusive but shall be cumulative with, and in addition to, all remedies now or hereafter allowed by law or equity. 5:02 NO WAIVER: The waiver ,of any breach by any party of any provision of this agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver ofanysubsequent breach of this agreement. 5.03 ASSIGNMENT: This agreement is specifically not assign- able by Contractor to any person or entity. Any assignment or attempt to assign by Contractor, whether it be voluntary .or involuntary, by operation of law or otherwise, is void and is a material breach of this agreement giving rise to a right to terminate as set forth in Section 4.03. 5.04 ATTORNEY FEES: In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between the parties hereto, arising out of or relating to this agreement, or the breach thereof, the pre- vailing party shall be entitled, in addition to other such relief as may be granted, to a reasonable sum as and for attorney fees. 5.05, TIME FOR PERFORMANCE: Except as otherwise expressly provided for in this agreement, should the performance of any act required .by this agreement. to be performed by either party be prevented or delayed by any act of God, strike, lockout, labor trouble, inability to secure materials, or any, other cause except financial inability not the fault of the party required to perform the act, the time for performance of the act will be extended for a period of time equivalent to the period of delay and performance of the act during the period of delay will be excused; provided, however, that nothing contained in this Section shall exclude the prompt payment by either party as required by this agreement or the performance of any act rendered difficult or impossible solely because -.of the financial condition of the party required to perform the act. 5.06 NOTICES: Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, any and all notices or other communications. , required or permitted by this agreement or by law to be served on or given to any party to this agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly served and given when personally delivered or in lieu of such personal service when deposited in- the United States mail, first-class postage prepaid to the following address for each respective party: PARTY ADDRESS Revised 3/98 -7- 00014G A. CITY OF ATASCADERO 6500 Palma Avenue, Rm 107 DPT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES Atascadero, CA' 93422 (461-5000) B. KAREN E TRADA 3430 LIGA ROAD Atascadero CA 93422 (805) 801-4943 5.07 GOVERNING LAW: This agreement and all matters relating to this agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California in force at the time any need for the inter- pretati n of this agreement. or any decision or holding con- cerning this agreement arises. 5.08 BINDING EFFECT: This agreement shall be binding on and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, ad- ministrators, dministr tors, successors and assigns , of the parties hereto, but nothing in this Section shall be construed as a consent by City to any assignment of this agreement or any interest in this agreement. . 5.09 SEVERABILITY: . Should any provision of this agreement be held by a court of competent jurisdiction 'or by a legislative or rulemaking act to be either invalid;void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this agreement shall remain in full force and effect, unimpaired by the holding, legislation or rule 5.10 SOLE AND ENTIRE .AGREEMENT: This agreement constitutes the sole and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. This agreement correctly sets forth the obligations of the parties hereto to each other as of the date of this agreement. All agreements . or representations respecting the subject matter of this agreement not expressly set forth or referred to in this agreement are null and void. 5.11 TIME: Time is expressly declared to be of the essence of this agreement.. 5.12 WE AUTHORITY The parties hereby represent that the individuals executing this agreement are expressly authorized to do so on and in behalf of the parties. 5.13 C NSTRUCTION: The parties agree that each has had an opportunity to have their counsel review this agreement and Revised 3/98 -8- 000147 'that any rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting shall not apply in the interpretation of this agreement or any amendments or exhibits thereto. * The captions of the sections are for convenience and reference only, .and. reference only, and .are not intended to be construed -to to define .or limit .the ';.provisions. .to which they : . relate. 5.14 AMENDMENTS: Amendments to this agreement shall be made only with the mutual written consent of all of the parties to this agreement. Executed on April 28, 1999, at Atascadero, California. Attest CITY OF ATASCADERO By: Marcia M. Torgerson Wade McKinney City Clerk City Manager Approved as to form: . By: Roy Hanley Karen Estrada City Attorney Contractor . Approved as to content: Brady Cherry, Director, Department of-Community Services Revised 3/98 -9- 000148 EXHIBIT A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR The Contractor shall utilize said premises for the following purposes.- A. urposes;A. Premises 'shall be used for the purpose of selling- over-the- counter tems such as soft drinks, candy, snacks, hot dogs, popcorn and cold sandwiches. NO ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES MAY BE. SOLD. B. Furnish and install at his own expense,. all necessary Y . equipment: required for proper service to the general public. C. The storage and service thereof shall be in an area approved by the Director of Community Services. D. Furnish and maintain proper facilities, equipment and devices for the concession as herein provided. E. Operate the facility in a business-like manner and to the satisfaction of the Department of Community Services, subject to the m intenance of said areas of conformance with the highest standards of health and safety, for patrons of said operatio F. All items to be sold shall be approved by the Department of Community Services. Revised 3/98 -10- 000149 ITEM NUMBER: C - 2 DATE:- 04/27/99 1918 p 19 8 City Man ger's Agenda Report Wade G. McKinney Authorizing An Amendment to the Contract Betwee' the City Council of the City of Atascadero and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommendation: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 1999-024, giving Notice of Intention to amend the Contract between the City Council of the City of Atascadero and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System 2. Adopt Ordinance,No. 358, on first reading by title only,authorizing the Mayor to execute an amendment to the contract between the City Council of the City of Atascadero and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System. DISCUSSION: This contract amendment is in keeping with the conditions of the current Memorandums of Understanding (MO 's) with the non-sworn members in the Atascadero Police Association (APA) and the Service Employees International Union(SEIU) Local 620. Earlier this fiscal year,the City Council authorized both of these MOU's for the bargaining units,which include a provision for the addition of the amendment to the contract for the 2% @ 55 retirement formula. This amendment wil apply to all CalPERS miscellaneous (non-sworn)members. FISCAL IMPACT: Because there is no change to the employer rate,there is not cost to this proposal. CalPERS expects this condition , to extend for at least eight years. The City did not commit to employees that we would pick up any future increased costs. The adoption of the contract amendment via a Resolution and Ordinance, will result in the following costs: 1) Change in th ,Present Value of Benefits $804,623 2) Change in the Unfunded Accrued Liability $493,143 3) Change in the employer rate 0% 4) Funded Ratio 117% 000150 ITEM NUMBER: C - 2 DATE: 04/27/99 RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 358 Resolution No. 1999-024 Exhibit contract amendment 000151L RESOLUTION No. 1999-024 RESOLUTION OF INTENTION O APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE , PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO WHEREAS, the Public Employees' Retirement Law permits the participation of public agencies and their employees in the Public Employees' Retirement System by the., execution of a contract, and sets forth the procedure by which said public agencies may elect to subject themselves and their employees to amendments to said Law; and WHEREAS, one of the steps in the procedures to amend this contract is the adoption by the governing body of the public agency of a resolution giving notice of its int ntion to approve an amendment to said contract, which resolution shall ontain a summary of the change proposed in said contract; and WHEREAS, the fo lowing is a statement of the proposed change: To provide Section 21354 (2% @ 55 Full Formula) for local miscellaneous members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the governing body of the above agency does hereby give notice of .intention to approve an amendment to the contract between said public agency and the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System, a copy of said amendment being attached hereto, as an "Exhibit" and by this reference made a part hereof. By: Presiding Officer Title Date adopted and approved (Amendment) CON-302(Rev.4/96) 000152 CaIPERS EXHIBIT California Public Employees' Retirement System AMENDMENT TO.. CONTRACT Between the Board of Administration California Public Employees' Retirement System and the City Council City of Atascadero The Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System, hereinafter referred to as Board, and the governing body of the above public agency, hereinafter referred to as Public Agency, having entered into a contract effective April 19, 1980, and witnessed March 19, 1980, and as amended effective July 1, 1980, April 30, 1983, January 7, 1984, July 14, 1990, November 9, 1991, April 12, 1992, August 29, 1992, and December 26, 1997 which provides for participation of Public Agency in said System, Board and Public Agency hereby agree as follows: A. Paragraphs 1 through 13 are hereby stricken from said contract as executed effective December 26, 1997, and hereby replaced by the following paragraphs numbered 1 through 13 inclusive: 1. All words and terms used herein which are defined in the Public Employees' Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined therein unless otherwise specifically provided. "Normal retirement age" shall mean age 55 for local miscellaneous members and age 50 for local safety members. 2. Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' Retirement System from and after April 19, 1980 making its employees as hereinafter provided, members of said System subject to all provisions of the Public Employees' Retirement Law except such as apply only on election of a contracting agency and are not provided for herein and to all amendments to said Law hereafter enacted except those, which by express provisions thereof, apply only on the election of a contracting agency. 000153 PLEASE DO NOT SIGN 'EXHIBIT ONLY„ 3. Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall become members of said Retirement System except such in each such class as are excluded by law or this agreement: a. Local Fire Fighters (herein referred to as local safety members); b. Local Police Officers (herein referred to as local safety members); C. Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as local miscellaneous members). 4. In ac dition to the classes of employees excluded from membership by said I Retirement Law, the following classes of employees shall not become mem Ders of said Retirement System: NO ADDITIONAL EXCLUSIONS 5. This contract shall be a continuation of the benefits of the contract of the Atas adero Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as "Former Age cy", pursuant to Section 20567.2 of the Government Code, Former Agency having ceased to exist and having been required by law to be succ eded by Public Agency on July 1, 1980. Public Agency, by this contract, assumes the accumulated contributions and assets derived ther Torn and liability for prior and current service under Former Agency's contract with respect to the Former Agency's employees. Legislation repealed said Section effective January 1, 1988. 6. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credi ed prior and current service as a local miscellaneous member shall be determined in accordance with Section 21354 of said Retirement Law (2% t age 55 Full). 7. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service as a local safety member shall be determined in accordance with Section 21362 of said Retirement Law (2% at age 50 Full). 8. Public Agency elected and elects to be subject to the following optional provisions: a. Section 21574 (Fourth Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits) for local safety members only. b. Sections 21624, 21626 and 21628 (Post-Retirement. Survivor Allowance) for local miscellaneous members only. 000154 PLEASE DO NOT SIGN "EXHIBIT ONLY" C. Section 21024 (Military Service Credit as Public Service), Statutes of 1976. d: Section 20903 (Two-Years Additional Service Credit), Statutes of 1976. Legislation repealed said Section effective January 1, 1979. 9. Public Agency, in accordance with Government Code Section 20834, shall not be considered an "employer' for purposes of the Public Employees' Retirement Law. Contributions of the Public Agency shall be fixed and determined as provided in Government Code Section 20834, and such contributions hereafter made shall be held by the Board as provided in Government Code Section 20834. 10. Public Agency shall contribute to said Retirement System the contributions determined by actuarial valuations of prior and future service liability with respect to local miscellaneous members and local safety members of said Retirement System. 11. 'Public Agency shall also contribute to said Retirement System as follows: a. Contributions required per covered member on account of the 1959 Survivor Benefits provided under Section 21574 of said Retirement Law. (Subject to annual change.) In addition, all assets and liabilities of Public Agency and its employees shall be pooled in a single account, based on term insurance rates, for survivors of all local safety members. b. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment within 60 days of date of contract to cover the costs of administering said System as it affects the employees of Public Agency, not including the costs of special valuations or of the periodic investigation and valuations required by law. C. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment as the occasions arise, to cover the costs of special valuations on account of employees of Public Agency, and costs of the periodic investigation and valuations required by law. 12. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be subject to adjustment by Board on account of amendments to the Public Employees' Retirement Law, and on account of the experience under the Retirement System as determined by the periodic investigation and valuation required by said Retirement Law. 000155 13. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be paid by Public Agency to the Retirement System within fifteen days after the end of the period to which said contributions refer or as may be prescribed by Board regulation. If more or less than the correct amount of contrbutions is paid for any period, proper adjustment shall be made in connection with subsequent remittances. Adjustments on account of error in contributions required of any employee may be made by direct payments between the employee and the Board. B. This amendment shall be ective on the day of , 19 BOARD OF ADMI ISTRATIO CITY OF COUNCIL PUBLIC EMPLOYEES" REMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO BY BY KENNETH W. ZION, CHIEF PRESIDING OFFICEF � ACTUARIA MPLOYER SERVICES DIVISION PUBLIC EP .OY ES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM ` Witness Date Attest: 00�tV Clerk AMENDMENT PERS-CON-702A(Rev.8\9 ) 000156 ORDINANCE NO. 358 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM. The City Council of the City of Atascadero does ordain as follows: Section 1. That an amendment to the contract between the City Council of the City of Atascadero and the Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System is hereby authorized, a copy of said amendment being attached hereto,marked Exhibit, and by such reference made a part hereof as though herein set out in full. Section 2. The Mayor of the City of Atascadero is hereby authorized, empowered,and directed to execute said amendment for and on behalf of said Agency. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption, and prior to the expiration of fifteen(15) days from the passage thereof shall be published at least once in the Atascadero News, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Atascadero and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. On motion by and seconded by the foregoing Ordinance is approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DATE ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO By: Ray Johnson, Mayor ATTEST: Marcia McClure Torgersen, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: • Roy A. Hanley, City Attorney 00015'7 I 00 CaIPERS EXHIBIT California Public Employees' Retirement System AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT Between the Board of Administration Calif Mia Public Employees' Retirement System and the City Council City of Atascadero The Board of dministration, California Public Employees' Retirement System, hereinafter referreJ to as Board, and the governing body of the above public agency, hereinafter referre J to as Public Agency, having entered into a contract effective April 19, 1980, and wit essed March 19, 1980, and as amended effective July 1, 1980, April 30, 1983, January 7, 1984, July 14, 1990, November 9, 1991, April 12, 1992, August 29, 1992, and December 26, 1997 which provides for participation of Public Agency in said System, Board and Public Agency hereby agree as follows: A. Paragraphs 1 through 13 are hereby stricken from said contract as executed effective DE cember 26, 1997, and hereby replaced by the following paragraphs numbered 1 through 13 inclusive: 1. All ords and terms used herein which are defined in the Public Emp oyees' Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined therein unle s otherwise specifically provided. "Normal retirement age" shall mea age 55 for local miscellaneous members and age 50 for local safety members. 2. Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' Retirement Syst m from and after April 19, 1980 making its employees as hereinafter provided, members of said System subject to all provisions of the Public Employees' Retirement Law except such as apply only on election of a contracting agency and are not provided for herein and to all amendments to said Law hereafter enacted except those, which by. express provisions thereof, apply only on the election of a contracting agency. 000158 1 PLEASE DO NOT SIGN "EXHIBIT ONLY" 3. Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall become members of said Retirement System except such in each such class as are excluded by law or this agreement: a. Local Fire Fighters (herein referred to as local safety members); b. Local Police Officers (herein referred to as local safety members); C. Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as local miscellaneous members). 4. In addition to the classes of employees excluded from membership by said Retirement Law, the following classes of employees shall not become members of said Retirement System: NO ADDITIONAL EXCLUSIONS 5. This contract shall be a continuation of the benefits of the contract of the Atascadero Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as "Former Agency", pursuant to Section 20567.2 of the Government Code, Former Agency having ceased to exist and having been required by law to be succeeded by Public Agency on July 1, 1980. Public Agency, by this contract, assumes the accumulated contributions and assets derived therefrom and liability for prior and current service under Former Agency's contract with respect to the Former Agency's employees. Legislation repealed said Section effective January 1, 1988. 6. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service as a local miscellaneous member shall be determined in accordance with Section 21354 of said Retirement Law (2% at age 55 Full). 7. The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service as a local safety member shall be determined in accordance with Section 21362 of said Retirement Law(2% at age 50 Full). 8. Public Agency elected and elects to be subject to the following optional provisions: a. Section 21574 (Fourth Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits) for local safety members only. b. Sections 21624, 21626 and 21628 (Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance) for local miscellaneous members only. 000159 PLEASE DO NOT SIGN "EXHIBIT ONLY" C. Section 21024 (Military Service Credit as Public Service Statutes ( rY ). of 1976. d. Section 20903 (Two-Years Additional Service Credit), Statutes of 1976. Legislation repealed said Section effective January 1, 1979. 9. Publii Agency, in accordance with Government Code Section 20834, shall not ba considered an "employer' for purposes of the Public Employees' Retirement Law. Contributions of the Public Agency shall be fixed and determined as provided in Government Code Section 20834, and such contributions hereafter made shall be held by the Board as provided in Government Code Section 20834. 10. Public Agency shall contribute to said Retirement System the contributions determined by actuarial valuations of prior and future service liability with respect to local miscellaneous members and local safety members of said Retirement System. 11. Publi Agency shall also contribute to said Retirement System as follows: a. Contributions required per covered member on account of the 1959 Survivor Benefits provided under Section 21574 of said Retirement Law. (Subject to annual change.) In addition, all assets and liabilities of Public Agency and its employees shall be pooled in a single account, based on term insurance rates, for survivors of all local safety members. b. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment within 60 days of date of contract to cover the costs of administering said System as it affects the employees of Public Agency, not including the costs of special valuations or of the periodic investigation and valuations required by law. C. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one installment as the occasions arise, to cover the costs .of special Valuations on account of employees of Public Agency, and costs of the periodic investigation and valuations required by law. 12. Cont ibutions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be . subject to adjustment by Board on account of amendments to the Public Y Emp I ees Retirement Law, and on account of the experience under the Retir ment System as determined by the periodic investigation and value tion required by said Retirement Law. 000160 r 13. Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be paid by Public Agency to the.Retirement System within fifteen days after the end of the period to which said contributions refer or as may be prescribed by Board regulation. If more or less than the correct amount of contributions is paid for any period, proper adjustment shall be made in connection with subsequent remittances. Adjustments on account of errors in contributions required of any employee may be made by direct payments between the employee and the Board. B. This amendment shall be effective on the day of ' 19 A BOARD OF ADMINISTRATOt CITY OF COUNCIL PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO BY � BY KENNETH W. ZION, CHIEF PRESIDING OFFICER `�� ACTUARIA MPLOYER SERVICES DIVISION PUBLIC LOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM Witness Dat , O� Attest:CS Clerk AMENDMENT PERS-CON-702A(Rev.8X96) 00016, 0011 ITEM NUMBER: C - 3 DATE: 04/27/99 ■ ss s;■ n 1918 1979 �1SCADF� City Man ger's Agenda Report Wade G. McKinney Road Abandonment #99001 Portion of San Gabriel Road (Harry B. Larsen Family Trust, 6095-6500 San Gabriel Road) RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planning Comm ssion recommends Council adopt Resolution No. 1999-022, approving Road Abandonment V99001. DISCUSSION: • Analysis: The applicant is re requesting the abandonment of a portion of the San Gabriel Road yq g right-of way located between 6095-6500 San Gabriel Road. This portion of San Gabriel Road is currently impassable for vehicular travel. The right-of-way for San Gabriel Road has existed in its present location ince the Atascadero Colony Map was recorded in 1914. Portions to the north and the south of the subject area have been improved to City Standards for a Rural Hillside Collector, but the portion proposed to be abandoned has not been improved. At present, the portion of the San Gabriel Road right-of-way does not provide access to any residential parcels. All adjacent residences have access from the portion of San Gabriel Road that is already improved and will not be affected by the abandonment. The project right-of-way only serves vacant land under the ownership of the applicant. The applicant wants to realign the San Gabriel Road right-of-way and improve the road to City Standards for Rural Hillside Collectors. A Rural Hillside Collector requires a minimum fifty (50) foot right-of- ay for new roads with twenty-six (26) feet paved (thirteen feet from centerline on each side). The City Engineer recommends the following condition be imposed: "San Gabriel Road shall be fully improved in conformance with City Standard Drawing Nos. 404 (Rural HillsideCollector) and 409 (Rural Road Design Standards), or as approved by the CityEngineer. The improvements shall extend from Santa Lucia Road to the southerly boundary of Lot line Adjustment No. LLA 99004 or as approved by the City Engineer. After reviewing the two different right-of-way locations staff has determined that the proposed right-of-way is less ntrusive and has a lesser degree of environmental impact than the existing 000162 ITEM NUMBER: DATE: right-of-way. The existing alignment would have approximately 12,835 yards of soil cut, approximately 11,867 yards of fill and would require the removal of 185 native oak trees. The proposed alignment would have approximately 11,009 yards of soil cut, approximately 7,180 yards of fill and would require the removal of 37 native oak trees. General Plan Consistency: _To abandon the right-of-way, the Planning Commission must find that the abandonment is consistent with the General Plan. In addition, a Resolution would have to be adopted by the City Council and recorded. The Government Code' says "If a general plan or part thereof has been adopted...no real property shall be...vacated or abandoned...until the location,purpose and extent of such...street vacation or abandonment...has been submitted to and reported upon by the planning agency as to the conformity with said general plan or part thereof." The abandonment itself will not diminish any circulation goal of the city, particularly since the location of the right-of-way is merely being realigned. The proposed realignment will fulfill a circulation goal set forth by the City in the Circulation Element which states "extend San Gabriel Road northwesterly to .connect with Santa Lucia Avenue and'Graves Creek Road within its established right-of-way". Staff believes the intent of the statement"within its established right- of-way" was to protect the adjacent landowners to ensure that the City was not given an obscure right to take an individual's land for street purposes and to encourage improving San Gabriel Road to connect to Santa Lucia Road and improve residential and emergency access to the area.. - j Abandonment: Under the Streets and Highways Code this application qualifies as Summary Vacation(short form abandonment) as opposed to the General-(long form)procedure: Pursuant to the California Streets and Highways Code'-, "the legislative body of a local agency may summarily vacate a street or highway if both of the following conditions exist...For a period of five consecutive years, the street or highway has been impassable for vehicular travel and no public money was expended for maintenance on the street or highway during such period.. " The proposed abandonment is consistent with the state requirements for Summary Vacation Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission considered the proposed Road Abandonment at a public hearing held on April 6, 1999. The Commission concurred with staff's recommendations and adopted Resolution No. PC 1999-013 (Attachment B). Resolution No. PC 1999-013 finds the proposed Road Abandonment to be in conformance with the General Plan, as required by the above referenced Government Code, and recommends that the "City Council approve the subject Road Abandonment application based on certain findings. ' Section 65402 z Section 8331 000163 ITEM NUMBER: DATE: Conclusions: The proposed Road Abandonment is consistent with the General Plan, would be neutral to the environment and raises no substantial planning issues. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ALTERNATIVE: The City Council coId deny the proposed Road Abandonment. The City may then have to bear the expense of improving this portion of San Gabriel Road as the Circulation Element identifies extending San Gabriel Road to Santa Lucia Road as one of its programs. RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: Community Development Department ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A-- Location Map Attachment B— Planning Commission Resolution 1999-013 Attac ent C -- City Council Resolution No. 1999-022 000164 AM a a � T N� F T i Cb IQ ~t3e •Si s� � �" 1� Il—�.. ---- 4b ? � I ATTACMENT B Planning Commission Resolution#1999-013 Road Abandonment#99001 RESOLUTION NO. 1999-013 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATASCADER RECOMMENDING SUMMARILY VACATION OF A PORTION OF A ROAD PU UANT TO STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND APPROVING THE REMOV OF SIX NATIVE OAK TREES WITH A DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT OF 24 INCHES OR GREATER AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS THERTO (ROAD ABANDONMENT#99001) WHEREAS, Streets and Highways Code 8330 permits summary vacation of a street or highway by adoptio 1 of a summary vacation; and WHEREAS, the portion of the San Gabriel Road right-of way, as shown on the attached Exhibit, has been impassable for vehicular travel for a period of five consecutive years and, no public money has been expended for maintenance on the street during such period; and WHEREAS the vacation of a portion of the San Gabriel Road right-of-way will not work to cut off access to any person's property which, prior to relocation or vacation, adjoined the street or highway to be vacated; and WHEREAS, the vacation of this portion of San Gabriel Road right-of-way will not affect any in-place, in-use ublic utility facility or will not terminate a public service easement; and WHEREAS, an Initial Study was conducted which indicates the proposed road abandonment will not have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS,'a Draft Negative Declaration has therefore been prepared and posted for the proposed abandonm nt which,barring any new information to the contrary, is adequate under the California Environniental Quality Act(CEQA); and WHEREAS, the General Plan Circulation Element identifies the extension of San Gabriel Road to Santa Lucia'Road as one of its programs; and WHEREAS, the trees to be removed are obstructing proposed improvements that cannot be reasonably redesigned to avoid the need for tree removal; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Road Abandonment and ti ee removal at a public hearing held on April 6, 1999; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of 000166 Planning Commission Resolution 1999-013 6095-6500 San Gabriel Road Page 2 Atascadero does hereby find that Road Abandonment #99001 is in conformance with the Atascadero General Plan pursuant to Government Code Section 65402. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero does hereby find that the removal of six native oak trees with a diameter at breast height of 24 inches or larger is in conformance with the City of.Atascadero's Native Tree Regulations. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Atascadero does hereby recommend that the City Council approve Road Abandonment#99001 as shown by Exhibit A and subject to Conditions of Approval as shown in Exhibit B. On motion by and seconded by ,the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA Planning Commission Harold L. Carden III Chairman ATTEST: PAUL M. SALDANA Director Community Development Department 9 ' at co leiW 52 S 75 ! ••� � pow,� wvo A .�J O o � O^ ��• � �. ice. �rno � ...j• •ice: i � � �-� N`�• ,1 ''--moi 'S !� O n �^� Irk 410. IN - E --- -I— 4b —t g � I � 1 EXHIBIT B CONDITIONS Revised at 4/6/99 Planning Commission Meeting Road Abandonment#99001 6095-6500 San Gabriel Road Engineering: 1. All road and drainage improvements shall be constructed in conformance with the City of Atascadero Engineering Department.Standard Specifications and Drawings or as directed by the City Engineer. 2. The applicant shall provide a six(6) foot wide public utility easement along San Gabriel Road outside the right-of-way. 3. The applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities within the existing San Gabriel Road right-of-way or within the proposed San Gabriel Road right-of-way. 4. The applicant shall enter into,a Plan Check/Inspection agreement with the City. All outstanding plan/check-inspection fees shall be paid prior to the final inspection. 5. The applicant shall have the map reviewed by all applicable public and private utility, companies (cable, telephone, gas, electric,Atascadero Mutual Water Company). The applicant shall obtain a letter from each utility company which indicates their review of the map. The letter shall identify any new:easements which may be required by the utility company. Letters from utility companies shall be submitted to the City prior to recordation of the parcel map. 6. The applicant shall submit Road improvement plans prepared by a registered civil engineer for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the abandonment of the existing San Gabriel Road right-of-way. Road improvement plans shall conform to the requirements of the City Standard Specifications, Section 2-Preparation of Plans. R- value testing shall be done, and the pavement section designed by a registered civil engineer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Road improvements shall include,but not be limited to the following: A. San Gabriel Road shall be fully improved in conformance with City Standard Drawing Nos. 404 (Rural Hillside Collector) and 409 (Rural Road Design Standards), or as approved by the City Engineer. The improvements shall extend from Santa Lucia Road to the southerly boundary of Lot line Adjustment No. LLA 99004 or as approved by the City Engineer. Transition shall be constructed where required to achieve a smooth join with existing improvements. B. Slope easements shall be provided on each side of the right-of-way as needed to accommodate cut or fill slopes. 7. The applicant shall acquire title or interest in any off-site land that may be required to allow for the construction of the improvements. The applicant shall bear all costs 000169 EXHIBIT B CONDITIONS REVISED AT 4/6/99 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Road Abandonment#99001 . Page 2 associated with the necessary acquisitions. The applicant shall also gain concurrence from all prop rty owners whose ingress or egress is affected by these improvements. 8. Lot Line Adj' stment No.LLA 99004 shall be recorded prior to the abandonment of the existing San 3abriel Road right-of-way. Planning: 9. A Tree Protection Plan shall be included as part of the submittal for the road improvement plans. The Tree Protection Plan shall show how specific trees will be protected during development and related work, including any required mitigation measures to ensure viability of the tree after construction. 10. An inventory of the trees to be removed shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the final approval of the Road Abandonment. The applicant wil I be required to establish and record a conservation easement prior to the approval oft the road improvement plans 11. The applicant shall hire a certified Arborist to prepare the Tree Protection Plan and Tree Inventory. Fire Department: 12. Fire hydrant shall be required at intervals of 500 feet or less,beginning at the Santa Lucia Road intersection. 0001'70 ATTACHMENT C Resolution no.1999-022 Road Abandonment#99001 RESOLUTION NO. 1999-022 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ATASCADERO SUMMARILY VACATING A PORTION OF A ROAD PURSUANT TO STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE; PART 3,PUBLIC STREETS,HIGHWAYS AND SERVICE EASEMENTS VACATION LAW; CHAPTER 4, SUMMARY VACATION. (ROAD ABANDONMENT#99001) WHEREAS, Streets and Highways Code .8330 permits summary vacation of a street or highway by adoption of a summary vacation; and WHEREAS, the portion of the San Gabriel Road right-of way, as shown on the attached Exhibit A, has been impassable for vehicular travel for a period of five consecutive years and, no public money has been expended for maintenance on the street during such period; and WHEREAS, the vacation of a portion of the San Gabriel Road right-of-way will not work to cut off access to any person's property which, prior to relocation or vacation, adjoined the street or highway to be vacated; and WHEREAS, the vacation of thisortion of San Gabriel Road right-of-way will not affect P any in-place, in-use public utility facility or will not terminate a public service easement; and WHEREAS,the General Plan Circulation Element identifies the extension of San Gabriel Road to Santa Lucia Road as-one of its programs; and WHEREAS, an Initial Study was conducted which indicates the proposed road abandonment will not have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, a Draft Negative Declaration has therefore been prepared and posted for the proposed abandonment which,barring any new information to the contrary, is adequate under the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA); and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,that the City Council of the City of Atascadero does hereby approve Road Abandonment#99001 as shown by Exhibit A and based on the Conditions of Approval contained in Exhibit B. a On motion by Councilperson and seconded by , the foregoing resolution is hereby adopted in its entirety by the following roll call vote: 000171 City Council Resolut on 1999-022 6095-6500 San Gabriel Road Page 3 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: CITY OF ATASCADERO, CA RAY JOHNSON, Mayor ATTEST: PAUL M. SALDAN , Director Community Development Department 0001'72 y - r col coX W QL --- a O � � f.. 40 Ar rf 4 $ IQ O w `off-:: s:—`; •a ; " ;•-; a� L it t- T .'• ♦� '� �. .` <f is `11 C • - I/ , , ,, EXIIIBIT B CONDITIONS Revised at 4/6/99 Planning Commission Meeting Road Abandonment#99001 6095-6500 San Gabriel Road Engineering: 1. All road and drainage improvements shall be constructed in conformance with the City of Atascadero Engineering Department Standard Specifications and Drawings or as directed by the City Engineer. 2. The applicantshall provide a six(6) foot wide public utility easement along San Gabriel Road outside he right-of-way. 3. The applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and/or alteration of existing utilities within the existing San Gabriel Road right-of-way or within the proposed San Gabriel Road right-of way. 4. The applicant shall enter into a Plan Check/Inspection agreement with the City. All outstanding p an/check inspection fees shall be paid prior to the final inspection. 5. The applicant'shall have the map reviewed by all applicable public and private utility companies (cable, telephone, gas, electric, Atascadero Mutual Water Company). The applicant shall obtain a letter from each utility company which indicates their review of the map. The letter shall identify any new easements which may be required by the utility company. Letters from utility companies shall be submitted to the City prior to recordation o the parcel map. 6. The applicant shall submit Road improvement plans prepared by a registered civil engineer for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the abandonment of the existing San Gabriel Road right-of-way. Road improvement plans shall conform to.the requirements Df the City Standard Specifications, Section 2-Preparation of Plans. R- value testing hall be done, and the pavement section designed by a registered civil engineer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Road improvements shall include,but not be limited to the following: A. San Gabriel Road shall be fully improved in conformance with City Standard Drawing Nos. 404 (Rural Hillside Collector) and 409 (Rural Road Design Standards), or as approved by the City Engineer. The improvements shall extend from Santa Lucia Road to the southerly boundary of Lot line Adjustment No. LLA 99004 or as approved by the City Engineer. Transition shall be constructed where required to achieve a smooth join with existing improvements. B. Slope easements shall be provided on each side of the right-of-way as needed to accommodate cut or fill slopes. 0001'74 EXHIBIT B CONDITIONS REVISED AT 4/6/99 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Road Abandonment#99001 Page 2 7. The applicant shall acquire title or interest in any off-site land that may be required to allow for the construction of the improvements. The applicant shall bear all costs associated with the necessary acquisitions. The applicant shall also gain concurrence from all property owners whose ingress or egress is affected by these improvements. 8. Lot Line Adjustment No. LLA 99004 shall be recorded prior to the abandonment of the existing San Gabriel Road right-of-way. Planning: 9. A Tree Protection Plan shall be included as part of the submittal for the road improvement plans. The Tree Protection Plan shall show how specific trees will be protected during development and related work, including any required mitigation measures to ensure viability of the tree after construction. 10. An inventory of the trees to be removed shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the final approval of the Road Abandonment. The applicant will be required to establish and record a conservation easement prior to the approval of the road improvement plans 11. The applicant shall hire a certified Arborist to prepare the Tree Protection Plan and Tree Inventory. Fire Department: 12. Fire hydrants shall be required at intervals of 500 feet or less,beginning at the Santa Lucia Road intersection. 000175 ITEM NUMBER: C - 4 to DATE: 04/13/99 ■ 0:0 ® ® i leis CA,D�i City Man a er's Agenda Report Wade G. McKinney Information Bulletin A. Fire Station 1 CDBG Construction Phases I& II U date Phase I The department received$19,000 on August 1, 1998, for construction. The action plan was to remove the firefighters from the health hazards of the engine bay and station building. Construction started' n August 18, 1998, with the installation of a fire corridor wall,two new bedrooms, new heating, air conditioning, and lighting. In addition, a new fire sprinkler system was installed in January , 1999, completing phase L Phase II Station 1 construction was funded $67,000 in January 1999. The action plan of this phase is to provide a new 900 sq. foot training room. This room will extend into the parking lot/lawn area on the south side of the station. This new room will provide firefighters with a safe environment to train, by removing them from the engine bay and shop, where they are currently conducting their classes, along with medical cleanup, apparatus repairs, generator room, and chemical storage: Phase II—Schedule • Architectural plans are to be completed during the week of April 12,1999. • The bidding pro ss and environmental report will start the week of April 19, 1999. • Construction is e` pected to start on June 1, 1999. B. Annual Operating Budget 1999-2000 Budget preparation is on schedule. Although hampered by computer challenges,the Administrative Services Department is reviewing the proposed department budgets. Staff anticipates holding a public hearing on June 8, 1999. 000176 ITEM NUMBER: C -4 DATE: 04/13/99 C. 1999 Parks and Recreation Commission Goals and Objectives On Thursday, March 16, 1999 the Parks and Recreation Commission voted unanimously to approve the attached list of Goals and Projects for 1999. The list of goals and projects reflect what the Parks and Recreation Commission believes are.important issues that should be addressed and accomplished, and they intend to use this list as a guide to direct their meetings and volunteer efforts during this calendar year. Community Services Department staff will help the Parks and Recreation Commission accomplish these goals by providing assistance within the budgetary guidelines established by the City Council. The Parks and Recreation Commission seeks comment from the City Council regarding these goals and projects. D. General Plan Amendment Applications City Council Resolution No. 26-95 provides the opportunity for private persons to make application for amendments to the elements of the General Plan on April 1 and October 1 of each year. The following General Plan Amendments were received prior to the April 1: GPA 99001 Applicant: John Bunyea Location: 1.08 acres located at 8930 Junip ero Request: General Plan Amendment from Moderate Density Single Family to High Density Single Family. GPA 99002 Applicant: Kelly Gearhart Location: 7470 El Camino Real Request: Urban Services Line Extension GPA 99003 Applicant: City of Atascadero Location: Ardilla Road Request: Modification of road classification in from collector road to local road. GPA 99005 Applicant: Silva/Bostwick Location: 8865 San Gabriel Request: Suburban Single Family to Moderate Density Family GPA 99006 Applicant: Kelly Gearhart • Location: West Frontage Road Request: Suburban Single Family to Moderate Density Single Family 0001'7'7 ITEM NUMBER: C -4 DATE: 04/13/99 GPA 99007 Applicant: Weston O'Reilly Location: San Rafael Road Request: Suburban Single Family to Moderate Density Single Family GPA 99008 Applicant: Weston O'Reilly Location: Atascadero/Navoja Request: Public to High Density Single Family A Em to ee Update Greg Greeson Special Projects Manager End of Assignment 4/16/99 Barbara Brown Temp Support Services Tech Hired 4/15/99 Jill Smethers Temp Support Services Tech Hired 4/15/99 Jeanne Dague Temp Support Services Tech Hired 4/15/99 Treena Strong Temp Support Services Tech Hired 4/20/99 0001'78 City of Atascadero Department of Community Services RECOMMENDED PARKS AND RECREATION COMMSSION GOALS AND PROJECTS FOR 1999 1. Pursue efforts to install a bridge at Paloma Creek Park 2. Develop a Stadium Park Master Plan 3. Conduct a comprehensive City facility tour 4. Prepare a comprehensive inventory of all Public Parks, Recreation facilities and open spaces 5. Update the Parks and Recreation Element 6. Assist in the development a Youth Master Plan in cooperation with the Youth Task Force 7. Continue efforts to develop a Youth Center in cooperation with ARCC 8. Continue.to pursue ADA improvements 9. Review and revise City Facility Policies, Procedures and Fees 10. Pursue efforts to improve the path around the lake 11. Update the Charles Paddock Zoo Master Plan in cooperation with the Zoological Society 12. Develop a lighting plan for Ata.scadero Lake Park 000 '79